alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Lands with Wilderness 

Characteristics within the

Billings Field Office Planning Area

Alternative C

Map 44

^

Billings

^

Columbus

¦§ ̈ £¤

^

Bridger

£¤

Frannie

^

Lovell

^

T1ST9S

R16E Montana R24E

R106W Wyoming R98W

T

56N

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü

0 115 230 460 690 920

Miles

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Legend

212

310

Map scale 1:500,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Lands with Wilderness Characteristics

Interstate

Highway

Rivers

Bureau of Indain Affairs

Bureau of Land Management

Bureau of Reclamation

Division of State Lands

National Park Service

State Dept. of Parks and Recreation

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

U.S. Forest Service

Water

Private 

Public Lands Survey System

90

^ Towns

^
§ 192.510 Repurchase of shares after conversion. ( a ) *Repurchases during first year after conversion.* A savings association may not repurchase its shares in the first year after the conversion except: ( 1 ) In extraordinary circumstances, a savings association may make open market repurchases of up to five percent of its outstanding stock in the first year after the conversion if the savings association files a notice under § 192.515(a) and the appropriate Federal banking agency does not disapprove the repurchase. The appropriate Federal banking agency will not approve such repurchases unless the repurchase meets the standards in § 192.515(c), and the repurchase is consistent with paragraph (c) of this section.
( 2 ) A savings association may repurchase qualifying shares of a director or conduct an appropriate Federal banking agency-approved repurchase pursuant to an offer made to all shareholders of the savings association.
( 3 ) Repurchases to fund management recognition plans that have been ratified by shareholders do not count toward the repurchase limitations in this section. Repurchases in the first year to fund such plans require prior written notification to the appropriate Federal banking agency.
( 4 ) Purchases to fund tax qualified employee stock benefit plans do not count toward the repurchase limitations in this section.
( b ) *Repurchases following first year after conversion.* After the first year, a savings association may repurchase its shares, subject to all other applicable regulatory and supervisory restrictions and paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Restrictions on all repurchases.* All stock repurchases are subject to the following restrictions. ( 1 ) A savings association may not repurchase its shares if the repurchase will reduce the savings association's regulatory capital below the amount required for its liquidation account under § 192.450. The savings association must comply with the capital distribution requirements at 12 CFR 5.55.
( 2 ) The restrictions on share repurchases apply to a charitable organization under § 192.550. A savings association must aggregate purchases of shares by the charitable organization with the savings association's repurchases.
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3300

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 15500 Pearl Road in Strongsville, Ohio, as 

the ‘‘Walter F. Ehrnfelt, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3300 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 15500 Pearl Road in Strongsville, Ohio, shall be 

4 known and designated as the ‘‘Walter F. Ehrnfelt, Jr. 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Walter F. Ehrnfelt, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 18, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
#### KUHN *v.*MILLER’S ADMINISTRATORS.

Justice’s transcript — clerk’s certificate — act of congress — nul tiel record.

The certificate of a clerk or prothonotory of the official character of a justice of the peace in' another state, is receivable to authenticate the transcript of a judgment, though such attestation is not within the act of congress for this attestation of record.

Debt, on the judgment of a justice of the peace in Pennsylvania. Plea nul tiel record, and issue.

The plaintiff, in support of the issue, offered the transcript of a judgment before a justice of the peace in Pennsylvania, certified by him, and attested by the prothonotary, and the certificate of the presiding judge of the' Court of Common Pleas.

Bostwick, for the defendant,

objected that the paper was not evidence, because it was not authenticated according to the act of congress.

By the Court.

This transcript is not embraced within the act of congress. The president of the Court of Common Pleas has no authority to attest a justice’s judgment. But this court has long been in the habit of receiving the prothonotary’s or clerk’s certificate as evidence of the justice’s official character. We think the same rule should obtain as to these certificates, and admit the evidence.

Judgment for the plaintiff.
# Official Journal C 149/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 149 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6230 April 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 149

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6230 April 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2019/C 149/01 | Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/678, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 401/2013, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/672 concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma | 1 |
| 2019/C 149/02 | Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma apply | 2 |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 149/03 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |
| 2019/C 149/04 | Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates applicable as from 1 May 2019(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 ( OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1 )) | 4 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2019/C 149/01

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/678, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 401/2013, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/672 concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma

1

2019/C 149/02

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma apply

2

European Commission

2019/C 149/03

Euro exchange rates

3

2019/C 149/04

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates applicable as from 1 May 2019(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 ( OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1 ))

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 ( OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1 ))

4

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
AFS-10-280-E June 10, 2010 Exemption No. 7353E Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-12009

Sheryl R. Israel, Esq. Hogan Lovells US, LLP 555 Thirteenth Street, NW. Washington, DC 20004

Dear Ms. Israel:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 7353, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 18, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Chautauqua Airlines, Inc. (Chautauqua), for an extension of Exemption No. 7353, as amended. That exemption from § 121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Chautauqua to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in place of an FAA training inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) who is completing initial or upgrade training specified in § 121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Chautauqua.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 7353, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 7353, as amended, to September 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 7353, as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 7353.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
# Official Journal L 50/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.050.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 50 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5424 February 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.050.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 50

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5424 February 2011

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | European Parliament |
| | | 2011/108/EU, Euratom |
| | * | Definitive adoption of amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2010 | 1 |
| | | 2011/109/EU, Euratom |
| | * | Definitive adoption of amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2010 | 15 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

BUDGETS

European Parliament

2011/108/EU, Euratom

*

Definitive adoption of amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2010

1

2011/109/EU, Euratom

*

Definitive adoption of amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2010

15

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euros unless otherwise indicated.Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### LONGWORTH’S LESSEE *v.*WOLFINGER, ET AL.

Tenant must surrender possession to landlord — disclaimer of landlord’s title — adverse possession.

It is well settled that a tenant must restore the possession of premises held as such, to his landlord, before he can set up a title in a stranger.

A disclaimer of the landlord’s title, and holding over may create an adverse possession.

The possession of an heir, or of the personal representative, is not adverse to that of the ancestor.

Ejectment for the south half of lot one hundred, in Cincinnati. The plaintiffs derived title from the heirs of Isaac Ludlow, and proved that the defendants entered into possession under the owner as his tenants, and then rested.

The defendants offered evidence to show a sale by the administrators of Ludlow for the intestate’s debts, a deed by the administrators, and a sale by the purchaser to third persons. ■

*King and.Storer,*for plaintiff,

objected to this as incompetent, and cited 1 *Pet. R. 44; 5 Pet. R. 484.*

*V. Worthington,*contra, was stopped,

By the Court.

It is well settled that a tenant must first restore his landlord’s possession, before he can set up an outstanding title to property occupied as a tenant. The case in 3 *Peters,*44, creates an exception to this rule; but the case on trial is not within that exception. In that case, there had been a disclaimer of the landlord’s title, and an adverse possession. The right to sell by the representative of the personalty, is not an *adverse*title to that of the intestate, but the same title. The testimony is excluded.

Verdict for the plaintiff.

Motion for a new trial overruled.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40362 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GEORGE BARRY CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:96-CR-15-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * George Barry Clark appeals his sentence for conspiring to defraud the United States by obtaining fraudulent income tax refunds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 286. He contends it was error for the district court to assess a four-level enhancement for his leadership role, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a), when calculating his sentence. The presentence report supports the determination that Clark was a § 3B1.1 leader or organizer. The district court did not clearly err in assessing the four-levelNo. 97-40362 -2- enhancement. See United States v. Ronning , 47 F.3d 710, 711 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Gadison , 8 F.3d 186, 196 (5th Cir. 1993). AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7515

VERNON L. QUINN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT G. JONES; RICKIE ROBINSON; WILLIAM MCWILLIAMS; J. C. WILSON; RICKY ANDERSON; RANDY LEE; DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE; CHARLES M. CREECY; DIRECTOR'S CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE; NATHAN RICE; LYNN C. PHILLIPS, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-93-726) Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 5, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vernon L. Quinn, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Ray Garvey, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days withinwhich to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).The district court entered its order on Oct. 5, 1994; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on Sept. 16, 1996, which is beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leavesthis court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6182

JOHN ARMSTRONG; ROBERT D. BIGGS; STERLING YOUNGCOURT; KENNY EDMONDS; RONALD JOSEPH GOVOSTIS; JEFFREY RITTER; MICHAEL SILBERMAN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; LEHRMAN DOTSON, Assistant Warden; PARKER, Hearing Officer;ROBERT KOPPEL, Captain; LOGAN CHANNEY, Captain, all defendants are sued in the individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1541-AW) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Armstrong, Robert D. Biggs, Sterling Youngcourt, Kenny Edmonds, Ronald Joseph Govostis, Jeffrey Ritter, Michael Silberman, Appellants Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General,2 Gloria Selena Wilson-Shelton, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court’s orders denying relief on their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Armstrong v. Corcoran , No. CA-97-1541-AW (D. Md.Dec. 11, 1997, and Jan. 8, 1998). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 611.510 Approval procedures. ( a ) Upon receipt of approval of a resolution by the Farm Credit Administration, the bank and the association shall call a meeting of their voting stockholders. Each institution shall notify each stockholder that the resolution has been filed and that a meeting will be held in accordance with the institution's bylaws. The stockholders meeting of the bank and the association shall be held within 60 days of receipt of the approval from the Farm Credit Administration.
( b ) The notice of meeting to consider and act upon the directors' resolution shall be accompanied by an information statement that complies with the requirements of § 611.515.
( c ) The proposal shall be approved if agreed to by: ( 1 ) A majority of the stockholders of the bank voting in person or by proxy, with each association entitled to cast a number of votes equal to the number of its voting stockholders;
( 2 ) A majority of the stockholders of the association voting, in person or by proxy;
( 3 ) The Farm Credit Administration.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1030 PLATE 27

EXPLAN.

Arkosie pebble conglomerate

3 =
a =
= =
& =
g Arkosie sandstone 2
3 a
=
5 z
% z
g Shale and siltstone, =
& undifferentiated z
3 = |
iz |
B
i z |
z
a
= |
Gray shale z
=
Ke 5
Magdalena hi 7 db A
oup, chi xy and brown,
shale, sandstone and limestone 2
— i
Formation contact, dashed
‘where inferred
13°30"
x =
= &
&| /S
S| /=
*| /g
w} /=
3) /&
Fg
=

Uraniferous siltstone

ATION

Fault, approximately located,
showing relative movement

77
‘Strike and dip of beds
7
Strike and dip of overturned beds

Outerop of copper minerals
or radioactive materials
——
Adit
cl3~420
Prospect trench
Location number-sample numbers

iple numbers.
italie from

CARBONIFEROUS
e
=
%

Caved adit

Caved raise(?)

GQUADALUPITA

((

tr,

“Wy
—

\
\

JOINS AREA B

wa baa0 INFERIOR-OEOLOGIGAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON. D.&. Geology by C. M. Techans and G.W. Fullen 1508
GEOLOGIC MAP OF AREA C SHOWING COPPER AND URANIUM DEPOSITS, COYOTE DISTRICT,
MORA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO

200 10)

400 Feet
es |
#### McCARLEY V. THE STATE.

(Decided February 12, 1914.)

Appeal from Morgan Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. Thomas W. Wert.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, J.

No error.

Affirmed.