alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE IN ST. PAUL v. THOMAS J. BALDWIN.1

December 29, 1916.

Nos. 20,041—(177).

Bills and notes.

Evidence sustained the verdict that plaintiff was the owner of the note in suit. [Reporter.]

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $900 upon a promissory note. The case was tried before Hanft, J., and a jury which'returned a verdict for $951.75 against Thomas J. Baldwin and for $727.93 against Riegel *&*Roe. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

Affirmed.

*C. D. & R. D. O’Brien,*for appellant.

*Frederick G. Ingersoll*and *Doherty & McNally,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 160 N. W. 1033.

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover on a promissory *note*made by the defendant to the Kissel Kar Company, and sold and indorsed by it to the plaintiff. *483There was a verdict for the plaintiff and the defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The only material issue was whether the plaintiff was the owner. The evidence sustains the finding of the jury that it was and there were no errors at the trial.

Order affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY   INFORMATION  FROM  THE  COMPANY'S  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS  DATED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFID IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINACIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                        4616
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 138810
<ALLOWANCES>                                  11872
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              170354
<PP&E>                                        418678
<DEPRECIATION>                                32253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                881233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         102200
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      290
<OTHER-SE>                                    324498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  881233
<SALES>                                       590809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              590809
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 562986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              2738
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            26246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               26997
<INCOME-TAX>                                  10799
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           16198
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  16198
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .55



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3734 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3734

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the Federal building located at Fifth and Richardson 
 Avenues in Roswell, New Mexico, as the ``Joe Skeen Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at Fifth and Richardson Avenues in 
Roswell, New Mexico, shall be known and designated as the ``Joe Skeen 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joe Skeen Federal 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 

          - [I.D. 040300B] 

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Issuance of permit amendment. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that Permit No. 738-1454 issued to Ms. Carole Conway, Genomic Variation Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, Meyer Hall, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-3322, was amended to allow import and export of blue whale samples from/to Mexico and other locations [worldwide] where the species is found. 

# ADDRESSES:

The amendment and related documents are available for review upon written request or by appointment in the following offices: 

Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13130 Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289); and 

Regional Administrator, Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802-4213 (562/980-4001). 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ruth Johnson (301/713-2289). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The subject amendment has been issued under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361*et**seq*.), the Regulations Governing the Taking and Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216), the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531*et**seq*.), and the regulations governing endangered and threatened marine species(50 CFR parts 222-226).                 

Issuance of this permit, as required by the ESA, was based on a finding that such permit (1) was applied for in good faith, (2) will not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species which is the subject of this permit, and (3) is consistent with the purposes and policies set forth in section 2 of the ESA. 

Dated: April 14, 2000. 

Ann D. Terbush, 

Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 00-10024 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
**Exhibit 31.1****Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification**I, Montgomery Bannerman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006of Verso Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:November 17, 2006       /s/ Montgomery Bannerman         Montgomery Bannerman,
SCWC-20-0000667

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI 

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, 

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, 

vs. 

SHECKY CABULIZAN, 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-20-0000667; CASE NO. 3DCW-20-0000110)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Shecky Cabulizan’s 

Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on September 28, 2022, 

is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, October 17, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd. W. Eddins

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-20-0000667

17-OCT-2022

12:59 PM

Dkt. 3 ODAC
#### HART’S LESSEE *v.*BLACKINGTON.

Foreclosed mortgage — ejectment against a sub-purchaser — occupying claimant law.

Where a purchaser of real estate gives a mortgage for the purchase money which is foreclosed, the mortgagee may recover in ejectment against one claiming to have purchased of the mortgagor.

The sub-purchaser in such case having no deed, is not entitled to pay for his improvements under the occupying claimant laws.

Ejectment. In November, 1814, Hart conveyed to J. and S. Wright, the township of land now called Saybrook, including the land in question, and took a mortgage for the payment of the purchase money. The money being unpaid, Hart proceeded upon the mortgage, and obtained a decree for a release of all Wright’s interest. The defendant claims to have entered under Wright, but has no deed. He demands pay for his improvements, under the statute for the relief of occupying claimants.

*Griswold,*for the plaintiff.

*Giddings*and P. *Hitchcock,*for the defendant.

By the Court.

The judgment must be for the plaintiff; he has the legal title, and right to possession. The motion for improvements is not allowed; the defendant is not in possession under *a deed,*in pursuance of the provisions of the statute.
#### CURRY V. THE STATE.

(Decided November 29, 1913.)

Appeal from Mobile City Court.

Heard before Hon. O. J. Semmes.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Pelham, J.

No error.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000796486
<NAME> ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         139,239
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  232,389<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      16,562,437<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,994,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      9,978,775
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,299
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,889,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,994,464
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,376,844
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,254,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             405,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (217,886)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (45,388)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (172,498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (201,310)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.57)
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES NET OF ALLOWANCE
<F2>PP&E NET OF DEPRECIATION
</FN>


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 108/4 Ma

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 108 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 484 May 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 108

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 484 May 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 108/1 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 2,05 % on 1 May 2005 — Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 108/2 | Administrative Commission of the European Communities on social security for migrant workers — Rates for conversion of currencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 108/1

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 2,05 % on 1 May 2005 — Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 108/2

Administrative Commission of the European Communities on social security for migrant workers — Rates for conversion of currencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

2

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2005/C 108/3 | Corrigendum to Commission Communication in the framework of the implementation Directive 97/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 May 1997 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning pressure equipment (OJ C 35, 10.2.2005) | 4 |

Corrigenda

2005/C 108/3

Corrigendum to Commission Communication in the framework of the implementation Directive 97/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 May 1997 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning pressure equipment (OJ C 35, 10.2.2005)

4

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# INTERIM TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT:

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM FOR

CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND CERTAIN

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT:

HIGH-INTENSITY DISCHARGE LAMPS

FEBRUARY 2013

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc. and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Exhibit 31.1Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CertificationI, Arnie Geller, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, INC.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedurespresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 

 
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: October 10, 2006   /s/ Arnie Geller Arnie Geller,  President and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-4465
In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena

_________________________ UNDER SEAL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNDER SEAL; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge; Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-939-B) Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 10, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Under Seal, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Corbin Byrd Woods, Sparks,Maryland; Ira Lee Oring, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying his motions to quash a grand jury subpoena to his former attorney, for reconsideration of the denial, for a stay pending reconsideration, and for a hearing. We have reviewed the record and the districtcourt's opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In re: Grand Jury Subpoena , No. CA-96-939-B (D. Md. May 9, 1996; June 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# AGENCY: 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

# ACTION: 

Notice of Meeting 

# SUMMARY: 

                        The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is sponsoring a public meeting involving the Office of Enforcement, the Office of the General Counsel, the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, and any interested members of the public. The purpose of the meeting is to provide a forum to discuss public comments on Management Directive 8.11, “Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions,” in response to a                         **Federal Register**                         notice dated October 7, 1999 (64 FR 54654). The staff plans to evaluate the comments received as part of an effort to improve the 10 CFR 2.206 petition process. The meeting is open to the public and all interested parties may attend.                     

# DATES:

 February 10, 2000, from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. 

# LOCATION:

 One White Flint North, Room O-10B4, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Andrew Kugler, Mail Stop O-4A15B, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-2738; Telephone: (301) 415-2828;                         *Internet:AJK1@NRC.GOV*

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Andrew J. Kugler, 

Project Manager, Section 1, Project Directorate III, Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 00-1040 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
§ 101.23 General operating limitations. ( a ) You must operate an amateur rocket in such a manner that it: ( 1 ) Is launched on a suborbital trajectory;
( 2 ) When launched, must not cross into the territory of a foreign country unless an agreement is in place between the United States and the country of concern;
( 3 ) Is unmanned; and
( 4 ) Does not create a hazard to persons, property, or other aircraft.
( b ) The FAA may specify additional operating limitations necessary to ensure that air traffic is not adversely affected, and public safety is not jeopardized.
[Doc. No. FAA-2007-27390, 73 FR 73781, Dec. 4, 2008]