alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00333

- CR

Kermit Antwoine Woods

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1430792D)

October 27, 2016

Opini on by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF A PPEALS

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

C hief Justice Terrie Livingston
§ 121.595 Dispatching authority: Flag operations. ( a ) No person may start a flight unless an aircraft dispatcher specifically authorizes that flight.
( b ) No person may continue a flight from an intermediate airport without redispatch if the airplane has been on the ground more than six hours.
# Official Journal L 342I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 342I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6316 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 342I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6316 October 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1505 of 16 October 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/1506 of 16 October 2020 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1505 of 16 October 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/1506 of 16 October 2020 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

6

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal C 127A/24 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 127A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5124 May 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 127A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5124 May 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 127A/01 | DG Joint Research Centre — Publication of a vacancy for a Deputy Director-General (grade AD15) — Brussels (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2008/10071 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2008/C 127A/01

DG Joint Research Centre — Publication of a vacancy for a Deputy Director-General (grade AD15) — Brussels (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2008/10071

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

38 39 40 41



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/18 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.20

                  SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT

      Each non-employee director receive annual compensation in the amount of
$25,000, paid in quarterly installments at the beginning of each fiscal quarter.
In addition, each Compensation Committee member, Audit Committee member,
Nominating Committee member, Chairman of each Committee and Lead Director
receive annual fees of $2,500, $5,000, $2,500, $5,000 and $15,000 respectively.
Employee directors do not receive any additional cash compensation for serving
on the Board of Directors, but are reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending
the meetings. Each non-employee director is included in the Company's executive
medical plan. Non-employee directors are permitted to participate in the
Company's investment and tax planning program.

      Each non-employee director is granted a nonqualified option to purchase
50,000 shares of common stock under the 2001 Non-Employee Director Option
Program (the "Program") upon election or appointment to the Board of Directors.
These options vest and become exercisable in three equal installments on each
anniversary of the grant date. In addition, the Program provides that each
non-employee director who is a director immediately prior to an annual meeting
of the stockholders and who continues to be a director after such meeting,
provided that such director has served as such for at least 11 months, will be
granted an option to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock on the related
annual meeting date. Options granted under the Program vest and become
exercisable in three equal installments on each anniversary of their respective
grant date.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      41,305,795
<SECURITIES>                                63,396,191
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,314,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                   379,500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     251,740,238
<DEPRECIATION>                              55,697,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             326,147,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    234,430,828
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          129,248
<PREFERRED>                                 66,798,135
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,960,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               326,147,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,424,512
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,827,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            26,375,454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               988,700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          27,891,369
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (75,830,818)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (75,887,318)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (75,887,318)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,123,308                       0
<SECURITIES>                                 1,266,941                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,052,491                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   405,427                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     50,368                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,356,579                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,103,653                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,237,776                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,787,993                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       722,859                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,277,431                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,237,776                       0
<SALES>                                      7,140,318               3,590,461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,635,776               3,930,722
<CGS>                                          618,228                 692,913
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,560,891               4,118,098
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,895                  21,229
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,074,885                  28,970
<INCOME-TAX>                                   380,093                   9,059
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            694,792                  19,911
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   694,792                  19,911
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .10                     .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10                     .00


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

------------------------------------------------------------

MESA AIRLINES, INC. -----------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On November 27, 2013, the Department authorized Mesa Airlines, Inc. (“Mesa”), a U.S.

certificated air carrier,1 the use of the trade name “American Eagle” for one year from the 

effective date of the merger between American Airlines, Inc., and US Airways, Inc. The 

Department limited the effectiveness of the authorization in light of the fact that the trade name 

American Eagle, was used by American Eagle Airlines, Inc., as well as other U.S. air carriers. 

On October 1, 2014, American Airlines, Inc. (“American”), requested that the Department issue 

a new notice without the limiting condition. In support of its request, American states that 

American Eagle Airlines, Inc., has subsequently changed its corporate name to Envoy Air Inc., 

and thus the potential for public confusion no longer exists.2

By this notice, the Department removes the aforementioned limitation placed on Mesa and 

acknowledges the continued use of the trade name “American Eagle” in its operations.

Dated at Washington, D.C., October 29, 2014.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov

 1 Mesa’s interstate certificate was last reissued by Order 98-7-6, issued July 8, 1998.

2 See Order 2014-4-13, issued April 15, 2014.
Attachment A 

SERVICE LIST FOR MESA AIRLINES, INC.

 MR ROBERT E COHN 

 MR PATRICK R RIZZI

 COUNSEL FOR MESA AIRLINES, INC 

 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

 COLUMBIA SQUARE

 555 THIRTEENTH STREET NW

 WASHINGTON DC 20004

 

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

 MR STEVEN D. D’URSO

 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

MR MARK MAZOR

CERTIFICATION MANAGER

FAA AFS-900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

 MR ALEC BRAMLETT

 MANAGING DIRECTOR

 LEGAL AND GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS

 AMERICAN AIRLINES INC

 

 

MR PETER LYNCH 

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ENFORCEMENT 

FAA/AGC-300

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591
###### Editorial Note on Part 11

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

#### § 11.23 Does FAA follow the same procedures in issuing all types of rules?

Yes, in general, FAA follows the same procedures for all rule types. There are some differences as to which FAA official has authority to issue each type, and where you send petitions for FAA to adopt, amend, or repeal each type. Assume that the procedures in this subpart apply to all rules, except where we specify otherwise.
§ 125.161 Fire-extinguishing systems. ( a ) Unless the certificate holder shows that equivalent protection against destruction of the airplane in case of fire is provided by the use of fireproof materials in the nacelle and other components that would be subjected to flame, fire-extinguishing systems must be provided to serve all designated fire zones.
( b ) Materials in the fire-extinguishing system must not react chemically with the extinguishing agent so as to be a hazard.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 944/2005

of 21 June 2005         

suspending the application of certain provisions of Regulation (EC) No 331/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 331/2005 of 25 February 2005 determining the aid referred to in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 for the private storage of butter and cream and derogating from Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 (2), and in particular Article 1(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The application of Article 1(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 331/2005 is suspended as from 23 June 2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 June 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 53, 26.2.2005, p. 15.

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Gamma Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Cunningham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/Joseph Cunningham |
|--------|----------------------|

|   | Joseph Cunningham |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | July 15, 2008 |
|--------|---------------|
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24521 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 16:59:55 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24521 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 16:59:55 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24521 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 16:59:55 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24521 Filed:06/09/23 Entered:06/12/23 16:59:55 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 4
#### DORSEY v. GOODENOW.

Implied assumpsit — dismissal of a bill for divorce — allowance to wife to carry on her suit and for subsistence.

Where a wife engages a lawyer to prosecute a divorce against her husband, the law will not imply an undertaking by the husband to pay the fees.

The dismissal of a bill for divorce by the court, is only evidence that the suit existed, and of the decree of dismissal, what occasioned it, is the subject of aliunde proof.

The Court, in a proper case, will allow a wife petitioning for divorce, sufficient to carry on the suit, and for subsistence.

Error, to the Court of Common Pleas. The suit below was assumpsit. Two points were raised in this case:

1. Whether the filing a petition for divorce *by an attorney,*upon the employment of the wife, is sufficient ground for an implied undertaking on the part of the husband, against whom it is filed, to pay the fees?

2. Whether the decision of the court dismissing the petition generally, is conclusive that it was filed without necessary or probable cause?

*R. Marsh,*for the plaintiff, in error.

*J.*and *D. L.*Collier, for the defendant.

By the Court.

The court below was right in refusing to instruct the jury, that the dismissal of a bill for divorce, conclusively proved that it was *unnecessary*to file the bill. It was only evidence of the existence of a suit, and the judgment or decree thereon. How, or what occasioned the judgment, is the subjeqt of proof dehors the recoi'd.

As to the other point: we think that where service is rendered for the wife, *against the will of the husband,*the fact of service does not afford a legal consideration for an implied assumpsit to pay. Where necessaries are furnished for the subsistence of the wife, the credit is given to the husband. If given to the wife, the husband is not chargeable. 7. *T. R.*432 — 1 *Saund. R.*284 — 5 *Taunt. R.*356. This is not such a case — here the service was for the wife, in a proceeding against the husband, intended to affect his conjugal rights. It would be difficult, against such facts, to raise a presumption of assent. Nor is it necessary to raise such a presumption to secure the wife a hearing of her complaints in court. Power is possessed by the court, to make an allowance to the wife, *pendente lite.*In a-proper case made, the court will make an allowance large enough to enable her to carry on her suit, and to subsist upon while it is pending.

The judgment is reversed, with costs.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1). | The                Report                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2). | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                July                18, 2006 | /s/Douglas                I. Payne             |
|---------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                                              | Douglas                I.                Payne |
|                                              | Chief                Financial Officer         |
#### Simon Estate

*Roland Fleer*and *Carl W. Funk,*for accountants.

November 13, 1956.

Taxis, P. J.,

. . . Decedent, by the fourth article of his will, bequeathed to his widow, Minnie Weil Simon, inter alia, all of his automobiles, together with all policies of insurance on the same. The petition for adjudication avers that decedent was killed in an automobile accident in which the Buick automobile in which he was riding was seriously damaged, that it was impossible to determine whether the death of decedent occurred simultaneously with or immediately before or after this damage and that the executors have distributed to the widow not only the proceeds of the sale of the automobile but also the proceeds of the collision insurance thereon of $1,950. The Buick automobile was inventoried in its wrecked condition at $410 and was sold for that sum. Towing and storage charges were paid in the sum of $57, and the net amount of $2,303, was paid to the widow as shown by the distribution account. Because there are living minors and possible unborn persons having contingent interests in the remainder of the trust of the residue who are not represented by a guardian and trustee ad litem, the question is submitted whether the distribution to the widow was proper under the circumstances.

*589At testator’s death, in whatever sequence his death occurred in relation to the damage of the automobile, the legatee became entitled to the automobile in its condition at that time as well as to the insurance policy which covered it. As long as she receives either the property itself or its proceeds, whether the latter he represented by proceeds of sale of the damaged vehicle or by the proceeds of the insurance policy which covered it is immaterial, and if the intention of testator need be regarded as a factor in determining the matter, his intention is clearly disclosed by his bequest of the insurance policy which could only be to assure that the legatee would not be deprived of both the automobile and its value by ademption due to any of the hazards covered by the policy. Otherwise the bequest of the policy would have no purpose. The distribution of the proceeds of the insurance policy and of the proceeds of the sale of the automobile is, therefore, approved. . . .
Faulk. Scott (OSn

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

tim richmond <kalaupapatim@hotmaiLcom>

Wednesday, October 23, 2013 7:07 PM

EAS(OSn

Makani Kai EAScontract

To Whom It May Concern:

I have resided in Kalaupapa since November of 2006. Until Makani Kai started servicing our remote community our

service was manipulated by the owners of Pacific Wings to their own benefit without concern for the Patients or ,

workers in Kalaupapa. When Makani Kai was awarded the EASContract, we were blessed with a company that has been

more than kind and fair to aiL They are professional and accommodating like no other air service I have been on. They

are as concerned with making sure that we have reliable and affordable services as they are about their own profits. We

are a small community that for most have no other way of reaching the "outside world". They are providing a service

that we cannot do without. I hope that you will award the EAScontract for the next 2 years and beyond to Makani Kai.

They have done an outstanding service to Kalaupapa.

Tim Richmond

Food Service Supervisor

Kalaupapa Settlement

808-567-6925

1