alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 285/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 285 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6223 August 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 285

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6223 August 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 285/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9404 — Goldman Sachs/B&B Hotels) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2019/C 285/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9422 — Leonard Green & Partners/Ares Management Corporation/Press Ganey Associates) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 285/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9404 — Goldman Sachs/B&B Hotels) (
  1
  )

1

1

2019/C 285/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9422 — Leonard Green & Partners/Ares Management Corporation/Press Ganey Associates) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 285/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 285/03

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 285/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9483 — Engie/Powerlines) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 285/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9483 — Engie/Powerlines) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3646

For the relief of Adela and Darryl Bailor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2003

Ms. CARSON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Adela and Darryl Bailor.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF CERTAIN LOSSES. 

4 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall 

5 pay, not later than 18 months after the date of the enact6 ment of this Act, out of funds not otherwise appropriated, 

7 to Adela and Darryl Bailor the amount determined by the 

8 Attorney General under section 2(b). 

9 (b) SETTLEMENT.—The payment of this sum shall 

10 be in full settlement of all claims of Adela and Darryl Bail11 or arising from an incident on May 9, 1991 that is the 
2

•HR 3646 IH 

1 subject of Case No. 94–2660 in the United States Court 

2 of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. 

3 (c) NO INFERENCE OF LIABILITY.—Nothing in this 

4 Act shall be construed as an inference of liability on the 

5 part of the United States. 

6 (d) LIMITATION.—No person shall have any claim on 

7 the amount described in this section, whether contractual, 

8 equitable or statutory, except for reasonable attorneys fees 

9 and expenses that do not exceed 10% of the amount paid 

10 under subsection (a). 

11 SEC. 2. AMOUNT. 

12 (a) TRANSMITTAL OF CLAIMS.—Not later than 6 

13 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, Adela 

14 and Darryl Bailor, or their representative, shall transmit 

15 to the Attorney General all claims for compensation re16 ferred to in section 1. 

17 (b) DETERMINATION OF THE ATTORNEY GEN18 ERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enact19 ment of this Act, with appropriate consideration given to 

20 the claims transmitted under subsection (a), the Attorney 

21 General shall determine the amount that Adela and Darryl 

22 Bailor shall receive.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF KPMG LLP



The Board of Directors
Aksys, Ltd.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-
18073) on Form S-8 of Aksys, Ltd. of our report dated January 28, 2000, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of Aksys, Ltd. as of December 31, 1999, and
1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1999, and for the period from January 18, 1991 (inception) through
December 31, 1999, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report
on Form 10-K of Aksys, Ltd.


                            KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 30, 2000
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3597

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Reclamation, to conduct a feasibility study on the Alder Creek water storage 

and conservation project in El Dorado County, California, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2003

Mr. DOOLITTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Reclamation, to conduct a feasibility study on 

the Alder Creek water storage and conservation project 

in El Dorado County, California, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STUDY AUTHORIZATION. 

4 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Pursuant to reclamation laws, 

5 the Secretary of the Interior (referred to in this section 

6 as the ‘‘Secretary’’), through the Bureau of Reclamation, 

7 and in consultation and cooperation with the El Dorado 

8 Irrigation District, is authorized to conduct a study to de-
2

•HR 3597 IH 

1 termine the feasibility of constructing a project on Alder 

2 Creek in El Dorado County, California, to store water and 

3 provide water supplies during dry and critically dry years 

4 for consumptive use, recreation, in-stream flows, irriga5 tion, and power production. 

6 (b) REPORT.—

7 (1) TRANSMISSION.—Upon completion of the 

8 study authorized by subsection (a), the Secretary 

9 shall transmit to Committee on Resources of the 

10 House of Representatives and the Committee on En11 ergy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report 

12 containing the results of the study. 

13 (2) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—The report shall 

14 contain appropriate cost sharing options for the im15 plementation of the project based upon the use and 

16 possible allocation of any conserved water. 

17 (3) USE OF AVAILABLE MATERIALS.—In devel18 oping the report under this section, the Secretary 

19 shall use reports and any other relevant information 

20 supplied by the El Dorado Irrigation District. 

21 (c) COST SHARE.—

22 (1) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of 

23 the costs of the feasibility study authorized by this 

24 section shall not exceed 50 percent of the total cost 

25 of the study. 
3

•HR 3597 IH 

1 (2) IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION FOR NON-FEDERAL

2 SHARE.—The Secretary may accept as part of the 

3 non-Federal cost share the contribution such in-kind 

4 services by the El Dorado Irrigation District as the 

5 Secretary determines will contribute to the conduct 

6 and completion of the study. 

7 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

8 are authorized to be appropriated $500,000 to carry out 

9 this section.

Æ
§ 1252.408 Remedial action by recipients. ( a ) Where NASA finds a recipient has discriminated on the basis of age, the recipient shall take any remedial action that NASA may require to overcome the effects of the discrimination. If another recipient exercises control over the recipient that has discriminated, NASA may require both recipients to take remedial action.
( b ) Even in the absence of discrimination, a recipient may take affirmative action to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation in the recipients program or activity on the basis of age.
# AGENCY:

 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 

# ACTION:

 Notice of pending NRC action to submit an information collection request to OMB and solicitation of public comment. 

# SUMMARY:

 The NRC is preparing a submittal to OMB for review of continued approval of information collections under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). 

Information pertaining to the requirement to be submitted: 

1. The title of the information collection: 10 CFR Part 140, “Financial Protection Requirements and Indemnity Agreements”.

2. Current OMB approval number: 3150-0039.

3. How often the collection is required: As necessary in order for NRC to meet its responsibilities called for in Section 170 and 193 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act).

4. Who is required or asked to report: Licensees authorized to operate reactor facilities in accordance with 10 CFR part 50 and licensees authorized to construct and operate a uranium enrichment facility in accordance with 10 CFR parts 40 and 70.

5. The number of annual respondents: Approximately 178.

6. The number of hours needed annually to complete the requirement or request: 821.

7. Abstract: 10 CFR part 140 of the NRC's regulations specified information required to be submitted by licensees to enable the NRC to assess (a) the financial protection required of licensees and for the indemnification and limitation of liability of certain licensees and other persons pursuant to Section 170 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and (b) the liability insurance required of uranium enrichment facility licensees pursuant to Section 193 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. 

Submit, by March 20, 2000, comments that address the following questions: 

1. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the NRC to properly perform its functions? Does the information have practical utility? 

2. Is the burden estimate accurate? 

3. Is there a way to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected? 

4. How can the burden of the information collection be minimized, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology? 

A copy of the draft supporting statement may be viewed free of charge at the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW (lower level), Washington, DC. OMB clearance requests are available at the NRC worldwide web site (http://www.nrc.gov/​NRC/​PUBLIC/​OMB/​index.html). The document will be available on the NRC home page site for 60 days after the signature date of this notice. 

Comments and questions about the information collection requirements may be directed to the NRC Clearance Officer, Brenda Jo. Shelton, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, T-6 E6, Washington, DC 20555-0001, by telephone at 301-415-7233, or by Internet electronic mail at BJS1@NRC.GOV. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of January 2000. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Brenda Jo. Shelton, 

NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-1039 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### § 4.1 Purpose.

This subpart describes the organization and functions of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and provides the OCC's principal addresses.
§ 623.3 Who may practice. ( a ) *By nonattorneys.* ( 1 ) An individual may appear on his or her own behalf; a member of a partnership may represent the partnership; a bona fide and duly authorized officer or other designated representative of a corporation, trust, association or other entity not specifically listed herein may represent the corporation, trust, association or other entity; and an authorized officer or other designated representative of any government unit, agency or authority may represent that unit, agency or authority.
( 2 ) Any accountant, appraiser or licensed expert may practice before the FCA in a professional capacity.
( b ) *By attorneys.* Any entity noted in paragraph (a) of this section may be represented in any proceeding or other matter before the FCA by an attorney.
( c ) Any person transacting business with the FCA in a representative capacity may be required to show evidence of his or her authority to act in such capacity and certification of credentials.
§ 717.91 Duties of card issuers regarding changes of address. ( a ) *Scope.* This section applies to an issuer of a debit or credit card (card issuer) that is a federal credit union.
( b ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section: ( 1 ) *Cardholder* means a member who has been issued a credit or debit card.
( 2 ) *Clear and conspicuous* means reasonably understandable and designed to call attention to the nature and significance of the information presented.
( c ) *Address validation requirements.* A card issuer must establish and implement reasonable policies and procedures to assess the validity of a change of address if it receives notification of a change of address for a member's debit or credit card account and, within a short period of time afterwards (during at least the first 30 days after it receives such notification), the card issuer receives a request for an additional or replacement card for the same account. Under these circumstances, the card issuer may not issue an additional or replacement card, until, in accordance with its reasonable policies and procedures and for the purpose of assessing the validity of the change of address, the card issuer: ( 1 ) ( i ) Notifies the cardholder of the request: ( A ) At the cardholder's former address; or
( B ) By any other means of communication that the card issuer and the cardholder have previously agreed to use; and
( ii ) Provides to the cardholder a reasonable means of promptly reporting incorrect address changes; or
( 2 ) Otherwise assesses the validity of the change of address in accordance with the policies and procedures the card issuer has established pursuant to § 717.90 of this part.
( d ) *Alternative timing of address validation.* A card issuer may satisfy the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section if it validates an address pursuant to the methods in paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this section when it receives an address change notification, before it receives a request for an additional or replacement card.
( e ) *Form of notice.* Any written or electronic notice that the card issuer provides under this paragraph must be clear and conspicuous and provided separately from its regular correspondence with the cardholder.
§ 107.19 Remote pilot in command. ( a ) A remote pilot in command must be designated before or during the flight of the small unmanned aircraft.
( b ) The remote pilot in command is directly responsible for and is the final authority as to the operation of the small unmanned aircraft system.
( c ) The remote pilot in command must ensure that the small unmanned aircraft will pose no undue hazard to other people, other aircraft, or other property in the event of a loss of control of the small unmanned aircraft for any reason.
( d ) The remote pilot in command must ensure that the small UAS operation complies with all applicable regulations of this chapter.
( e ) The remote pilot in command must have the ability to direct the small unmanned aircraft to ensure compliance with the applicable provisions of this chapter.
[Docket FAA-2015-0150, Amdt. 107-1, 81 FR 42209, June 28, 2016, as amended by Amdt. No. 107-8, 86 FR 4382, Jan. 15, 2021]
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William J. McEntee, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    WILLIAM J. MCENTEE,
JR.                   
|                        |  |  |  | William J. McEntee, Jr.                          
|                        |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I hereby  certify that,  to my knowledge,  the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), for the quarter ended June 30, 2004:

     1. fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 12, 2004                By:  /s/ Kenneth Ruotolo
       ---------------                     -------------------------------------
                                           Kenneth Ruotolo
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  has  been  provided  to the  Company,  and  will be
retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request.
Exhibit 31.1

    CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Bolink, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-Q  of  Chell  Group
Corporation. ("Chell");

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of Chell
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. Chell's other  certifying  officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Chell and have:

      a.  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
      disclosure  controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision,
      to ensure  that  material  information  relating to Chell,  including  its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

      b.  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  Chell's  disclosure   controls  and
      procedures and presented in this quarterly  report our  conclusions  about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation;

      c.  disclosed in this report any change in Chell's  internal  control over
      financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  Chell's  most recent  fiscal
      quarter  that  has  materially  affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to
      materially affect, Chell's internal control over financial reporting;

5. Chell's  other  certifying  officer and I have  disclosed,  based on our most
recent  evaluation  of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to Chell's
auditors and the audit committee of Chell's board of directors:

      a. all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
      operation  of  internal   control  over  financial   reporting  which  are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect Chell's ability to record,  process,
      summarize and report financial information; and

      b. any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees who have a  significant  role in Chell's  internal  control over
      financial reporting.

DATE: November 30, 2004


                             By  /s/ David Bolink
                                  ------------------------
                                  DAVID BOLINK
                                  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD



                                      -24-
§ 121.481 Flight time limitations: One or two pilot crews. ( a ) A certificate holder conducting flag operations may schedule a pilot to fly in an airplane that has a crew of one or two pilots for eight hours or less during any 24 consecutive hours without a rest period during these eight hours.
( b ) If a certificate holder conducting flag operations schedules a pilot to fly more than eight hours during any 24 consecutive hours, it shall give him an intervening rest period, at or before the end of eight scheduled hours of flight duty. This rest period must be at least twice the number of hours flown since the preceding rest period, but not less than eight hours. The certificate holder shall relieve that pilot of all duty with it during that rest period.
( c ) Each pilot who has flown more than eight hours during 24 consecutive hours must be given at least 18 hours of rest before being assigned to any duty with the certificate holder.
( d ) No pilot may fly more than 32 hours during any seven consecutive days, and each pilot must be relieved from all duty for at least 24 consecutive hours at least once during any seven consecutive days.
( e ) No pilot may fly as a member of a crew more than 100 hours during any one calendar month.
( f ) No pilot may fly as a member of a crew more than 1,000 hours during any 12-calendar-month period.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19217, Dec. 31, 1964; 30 FR 3639, Mar. 19, 1965, as amended by Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2612, Jan. 26, 1996]