alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF CEO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Virtual Crypto Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2018 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Alon
Dayan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.





|/s/ Alon Dayan          | 
|----------------------- | 
|Alon Dayan              | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        | 
|Dated: July 31, 2018    | 



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1206.600 General policy. ( a ) Notice shall be given to a submitter whenever the information requested is commercial information and has been designated by the submitter as information deemed protected from disclosure under Exemption 4 of the Act, or the Agency otherwise has reason to believe that the information may be protected from disclosure under Exemption 4. For the purpose of applying the notice requirements, commercial information is information provided by a submitter and in the possession of NASA, that may arguably be exempt from disclosure under the provisions of Exemption 4 of the FOIA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)). The meaning ascribed to this term for the purpose of this notice requirement is separate and should not be confused with use of this or similar terms in determining whether information satisfies one of the elements of Exemption 4.
( b ) A submitter is a person or entity outside the Federal Government from whom the Agency directly or indirectly obtains commercial or financial information. The term submitter includes, but is not limited to corporations, state governments, individuals, and foreign governments.
( c ) The notice requirements of § 1206.601 will not apply if: ( 1 ) The information has been lawfully published or officially made available to the public; or
( 2 ) Disclosure of the information is required by a statute (other than this part); or
( 3 ) The submitter has received notice of a previous FOIA request which encompassed information requested in the later request, and the Agency intends to withhold and/or release information in the same manner as in the previous FOIA request.
( d ) An additional limited exception to the notice requirements of § 1206.601, to be used only when all of the following exceptional circumstances are found to be present, authorizes the Agency to withhold information that is the subject of a FOIA request, based on Exemption 4 (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)), without providing the submitter individual notice when: ( 1 ) The Agency would be required to provide notice to over ten (10) submitters, in which case, notification may be accomplished by posting or publishing the notice in a place reasonably calculated to accomplish notification.
( 2 ) Absent any response to the published notice, the Agency determines that if it provided notice as is otherwise required by § 1206.601, it is reasonable to assume that the submitter would object to disclosure of the information based on Exemption 4; and,
( 3 ) If the submitter expressed the anticipated objections, the Agency would uphold those objections.
( e ) The exception shall be used only with the approval of the Chief Counsel of the Center, the Counsel to the Inspector General, or the Associate General Counsel responsible for providing advice on the request. This exception shall not be used for a class of documents or requests, but only as warranted by an individual FOIA request.
David M. Kirstein

Direct 202.331-3348

Fax 202.331.3933 Email dkirstein@yklaw.com

March 2, 2010

BY ELECTRONIC FILING

Ms. Dorothy Beard Docket Management System U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

RE : Polling Results for Exemption Application of Spirit

Docket OST-2010-0052

Dear Ms. Beard:

This is to advise that we have completed our polling of the carrier s on Spirit’s application for Exemption authority to provide air tran sportation service betw een U.S.–Barranquilla, Colombia. There are no objections.

Sincerely,

David M. Kirstein

cc: Esta Rosenberg by email Brian Hedberg by email

Service List
I DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

CERTIFIED TRANSLATION

I, Gladys Rodríguez-Fornaris, MA in Translation (UPR 1995), DO CERTIFY that I have translated into English the foregoing document, 

as submitted in Spanish by the interested party; and that said translation is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and abilities.

S/ GLADYS RODRÍGUEZ-FORNARIS

Under penalty of absolute nullity, I hereby certify that no public official of the Department of the Treasury, its subsidiaries

and affiliates is a party to or has any interest in the profits or benefits resulting from the agreement covered by this invoice,

and should he or she be a party to or have any interest in the profits or benefits resulting from the agreement,

a prior waiver has been issued. The only consideration for providing the goods or services covered by the agreement

has been the payment agreed upon with the agency's authorized representative. The amount of this invoice is fair

and correct. The services have been rendered and no payment has been received therefor.

[Signed] Authorized Siganture

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24708-3 Filed:07/06/23 Entered:07/06/23 10:36:01 Desc:

Certified Translation of Docket No. 24673-4 Page 1 of 1
#### § 713.1 What is the scope of this section?

This section provides the requirements for fidelity bonds for federally insured credit union employees and officials and for other insurance coverage for losses such as theft, holdup, vandalism, etc., caused by persons outside the credit union. Federally insured, state-chartered credit unions are required by § 741.201 of this chapter to comply with the fidelity bond coverage requirements of this part. Corporate credit unions must comply with § 704.18 of this chapter in lieu of this part.

[84 FR 35524, July 24, 2019]
§ 1212.601 Maintenance and publication requirements for systems of records. ( a ) In maintaining systems of records, NASA shall: ( 1 ) Maintain any record in a system of records for necessary and lawful purposes only, assure that the information is current and accurate for its intended use, and provide adequate safeguards to prevent misuse of the information.
( 2 ) Maintain only information about an individual relevant and necessary to accomplish a purpose or to carry out a function of NASA authorized by law or by Executive order of the President.
( 3 ) Maintain records used by NASA officials in making any determination about any individual with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness reasonably necessary to assure fairness to the individual in making the determination.
( 4 ) Maintain no record describing how an individual exercises rights guaranteed by the First Amendment unless expressly authorized by statute, by the individual about whom the record is maintained or unless pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity.
( 5 ) Maintain and provide access to records of other agencies under NASA's control consistent with the regulations of this part.
( b ) Any system of records maintained by NASA which is in addition to or substantially different from a Governmentwide systems of records described in a systems notice published by another agency shall be regarded as a NASA system of records subject to the requirements of this part.
( c ) NASA shall provide adequate advance notice to Congress and OMB of any proposal to establish a new system of records or alter any existing system of records as prescribed by OMB Circular No. A-130, appendix I.
[57 FR 4928, Feb. 11, 1992, as amended at 77 FR 60621, Oct. 4, 2012]
§ 121.347 Communication and navigation equipment for operations under VFR over routes navigated by pilotage. ( a ) No person may operate an airplane under VFR over routes that can be navigated by pilotage unless the airplane is equipped with the radio communication equipment necessary under normal operating conditions to fulfill the following: ( 1 ) Communicate with at least one appropriate station from any point on the route;
( 2 ) Communicate with appropriate air traffic control facilities from any point within Class B, Class C, or Class D airspace, or within a Class E surface area designated for an airport in which flights are intended; and
( 3 ) Receive meteorological information from any point en route by either of two independent systems. One of the means provided to comply with this subparagraph may be used to comply with paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section.
( b ) No person may operate an airplane at night under VFR over routes that can be navigated by pilotage unless that airplane is equipped with— ( 1 ) Radio communication equipment necessary under normal operating conditions to fulfill the functions specified in paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) Navigation equipment suitable for the route to be flown.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19205, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-226, 56 FR 65663, Dec. 17, 1991; Amdt. 121-333, 72 FR 31681, June 7, 2007]
Exhibit 32(a)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Amendment  No.  1  to  Quarterly  Report  of  PREMIER
EXHIBITIONS,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on November 5, 2004,
(the  "Report"),  I, Arnie  Geller,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Arnie Geller
-------------------------
Arnie Geller
Chief Executive Officer
November 5, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

IN RE: 

Financial Oversight & Management Board 

for Puerto Rico 

as representative of 

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al

Debtors

3:17-BK-3283 (LTS)

PROMESA Title III

(Jointly Administrated) 

Yamielle Marquez Canales/

Claim 122090

REPLY TO THE NOTIFICATION OF THE FIFTY TWENTY-EIGHTH 

GLOBAL OBJECTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, THE 

EMPLOYEE’S RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE 

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO AND THE PUERTO RICO 

HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TO ADR DEFICIENT 

CLAIMS

To the Honorable Court:

COMES NOW Attorney César Enrique Molina Aponte, pro se, and very 

respectfully SETS FORTH and PRAYS:

1. The contact information of the undersigned attorney and through which you can 

contact Yamielle Marquez Canales, claim 122090, appears at the end of this 

motion.

2. We begin by stating that from the beginning, we have delivered the documentation 

that evidences a reliable claim. Even on September 6, 2022, as ordered, evidence 

was presented on these claims

3. As a matter of fact, the lawsuit in question was bifurcated and initially it was 

evaluated whether the plaintiffs were right in their claims and in the second part of 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22826 Filed:11/08/22 Entered:11/08/22 18:14:02 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

the lawsuit, it remains to be determined how much damage the Government of 

Puerto Rico caused them. 

4. So far, the damage hearing has not been held since the case is paralyzed by 

PROMESA.

5. Thus, this Illustrious Court should not rule out this claim. 

6. Attached to this document are the documents that evidence the decision of the 

Court of First Instance, which was also confirmed by the Court of Appeals; also, 

the evidence of documents sent on September 6, 2022. 

WHEREFORE it is respectfully requested from this Honorable Court to 

grant this motion and dismiss the motion filed by the creditor.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: I hereby certify that on this same date, I 

electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/EDF 

systems, which will send notification of such filing to the office of the United States 

Trustee, and all participants of CM/ECF.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, on the 8th day of November 2022.

f/ César Enrique Molina

CÉSAR ENRIQUE MOLINA APONTE

USDC-PR-300906

Attorney for creditor

PEDRO ORTIZ ÁLVAREZ, LLC

P.O. Box 9009

Ponce, Puerto Rico 00732

Tel.: (787) 758-9356 / (787) 841-7575

Fax: (787) 758-9243 / (787) 841-0000 

E-mail: pedro@poalaw.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22826 Filed:11/08/22 Entered:11/08/22 18:14:02 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### BOARD OF ED. OF CITY OF CHICKASHA et al. v. CITY OF CHICKASHA ex rel. POOL.

No. 31123.

Feb. 6, 1945.

*155 P. 2d 723.*

*128.Bailey & Hammerly and Wm. W. Grigsby, County Atty., all of Chickasha, for plaintiffs in error. *'*

Jeff H. Williams, of Chick-asha, for defendant in error.

WELCH, J.

This is a mandamus action brought by the plaintiff, H. C. Pool, bondholder, for himself and all others sijnila'riy situated. He sought by the •’remedy of mandamus to require the •board of education to provide in its budget for the fiscal -year 1942-43 for funds with which to pay the 1927 or 1928 installment of the paving assessments levied against the property of the board of education, together with the accrued penalty thereon, and to require said board of education to make provision in its budget for ensuing years for the funds with which to pay. the remaining delinquent installments of the paving assessments on its property.

The facts involved here are almost identical with the facts in Wilson v. City of Hollis, 193 Okla. 241, 142 P. 2d 633. The situation of the parties and the respective rights and liabilities are identical, and without further discussion we hold that the rules of law promulgated and followed in that former decision are applicable and controlling here.

In that former decision we announced our conclusions in the following language: .

> • “We hold that the Legislature provided, as it had a right to do, the amount that should be paid on public property and the manner in which it should be paid. Wé therefore hold under this act that the'only amount that public property máíy be liable for is the proportionate amount assessable to it, which amount is payable in ten installments with interest at the rate of *1%*per annum ás o’f the date each installment is due, and that no delinquency that will carry with it additional interest or penalty can accrue against public property, and that the provisions relating to delinquencies and penalties were not intended to apply to municipalities.”

. And in a subsequent paragraph as follows: • ,

> “We therefore hold judgment may be rendered against the school district whose property has been assessed a portion of the cost of a public improvement for th^,..principal of the unpaid annual installments',' plus the interest due on each on the date of its maturity. This judgment may then be paid as other judgments are paid under section 28, art. 10, Const, of Oklahoma, and 62 O.S. 1941 § 431 et seq. To this extent Independent School Dist. v. Exchange Nat. Co. supra, First Nat. Bank v. Board of Education, 174 Okla. 164, 49 P. 2d 1077, and City of Shawnee v. Exchange Nat. Co. 185 Okla. 451, 94 P. 2d 250, are overruled.”

Therefore, as was adjudged in the *129Wilson Case, the judgment of the trial court here appealed from, which granted mandamus for the year involved, is hereby set aside and this cause is re- ■ manded to the trial court, with directions to take further proceedings in conformity with the views expressed herein.

GIBSON, C.J., HURST, V.C.J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, CORN, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3733 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3733

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  410 Huston Street in Altamont, Kansas, as the ``Myron V. George Post 
                                Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 410 
Huston Street in Altamont, Kansas, shall be known and designated as the 
``Myron V. George Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Myron V. George Post 
Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 607.6 Payment of assessment. ( a ) System institutions shall pay the amounts due as scheduled in the FCA Notice of Assessment. Payment shall be made by electronic funds transfer (EFT) for credit to the FCA's account in the Department of the Treasury, by check to the FCA for deposit, or by such other means as the FCA may authorize.
( b ) Payments made by EFT that are not received by the close of business on the due date shall be considered delinquent in accordance with § 607.7.
( c ) Payments made by check that are not received by the FCA before the close of business on the third workday preceding the due date shall be considered delinquent in accordance with § 607.7.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                    5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              65,179
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      272,539
<ALLOWANCES>                                       118,345
<INVENTORY>                                        131,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   430,422
<PP&E>                                             535,545
<DEPRECIATION>                                     328,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,589,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,323,906
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            171
<COMMON>                                           458,982
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,589,985
<SALES>                                          2,711,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,711,289
<CGS>                                            1,551,893
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,549,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (373,904)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (373,904)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (373,904)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.03)
        

</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of General Metals Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel J. Forbush, the Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 5, 2007.

 

/s/ Daniel J. Forbush                                                      

Daniel J. Forbush

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer 

and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

CW1229877.1
§ 125.129 Fuel system lines and fittings. ( a ) Fuel lines must be installed and supported so as to prevent excessive vibration and so as to be adequate to withstand loads due to fuel pressure and accelerated flight conditions.
( b ) Lines connected to components of the airplane between which there may be relative motion must incorporate provisions for flexibility.
( c ) Flexible connections in lines that may be under pressure and subject to axial loading must use flexible hose assemblies rather than hose clamp connections.
( d ) Flexible hoses must be of an acceptable type or proven suitable for the particular application.
##### 



Exhibit 10.6
 LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD.
c/o Laurus Capital Management, LLC
335 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor
New York, NY 10017
  
  Re: Amendment to Intellectual Property Security Agreement
  IP
Agreement Verso Telemate Verilink Grantors Grantor Laurus IP
Assignment
    [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]




---



##### 



Very truly yours,
LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD.By:

/s/
David GrinName:
    David GrinTitle:
    Director   /s/ Martin D. Kidder
  /s/ Martin D. Kidder
  /s/ Martin D. Kidder