alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000796529
<NAME> HANOVER LEASE INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FDS 3/31/97
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         109,181
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,126
<PP&E>                                       5,032,434
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,032,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          248,289
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    25,570,053
<OTHER-SE>                                (25,688,216)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   130,126
<SALES>                                         34,212
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,633
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                109,567
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            109,567
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   109,567
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 705
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 705 appear at 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 705.10 Appeals. ( a ) *Appeals of non-qualification.* A Qualifying Credit Union whose application for a loan or technical assistance grant has been denied under § 705.7(f) for failure to satisfy any of the conditions set forth in § 705.7(c), including any additional criteria set forth in the related notice of funding opportunity, may request the Director of the Office of Small Credit Union Initiatives to reconsider the denial and/or appeal that decision to the NCUA Board in accordance with the procedures set forth in subpart B to part 746 of this chapter, subject to the following limitations: ( 1 ) *Scope.* The scope of the Board's review is limited to the threshold question of qualification and not the issue of whether, among qualified applicants, a particular loan or technical assistance grant is funded.
( 2 ) *Appeals procedures inapplicable.* The foregoing procedure applies during an open period in which funds are available and NCUA has called for applications. NCUA will reject any application submitted during a period in which NCUA has not called for applications, except for applications submitted under § 705.8. Such rejections are not subject to appeal or review by the NCUA Board.
( b ) *Appeals of technical assistance grant reimbursement denials.* Pursuant to NCUA Interpretative Ruling and Policy Statement 11-1, any Participating Credit Union may appeal a denial of a technical assistance grant reimbursement to NCUA's Supervisory Review Committee. All appeals of technical assistance grant reimbursements must be submitted to the Supervisory Review Committee within 30 days from the date of the denial. The decisions of the Supervisory Review Committee are final and may not be appealed to the NCUA Board.
[81 FR 85113, Nov. 25, 2016, as amended at 82 FR 50293, Oct. 30, 2017]
EXHIBIT 24



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints C.
Stanley Bailey, C. Marvin Scott and Rick D. Gardner, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign on his behalf,
Superior Financial Corp, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.



Hereby executed by the following persons in the capacities indicated on March 11, 2003 in Fort Smith, Arkansas.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/    C. STANLEY
BAILEYC.
Stanley Bailey        
|                                                 
|/s/    C. MARVIN
SCOTTC.
Marvin Scott            
|                                                 
|/s/    RICK D.
GARDNERRick D. Gardner            
|                                                 
|/s/    TERRY A.
ELLIOTTTerry A. Elliott          
|                                                 
|/s/    BRIAN A.
GAHRBrian A. Gahr                
|                                                 
|/s/    H. BAKER
KURRUSH.
Baker Kurrus            
|                                                 
|/s/    HOWARD B.
MCMAHONHoward B. McMahon        
|                                                 
|/s/    JOHN M.
STEINJohn M.
Stein                
|                                                 
|/s/    JOHN E.
STEURIJohn E. Steuri              
|                                                 
|/s/    DAVID E.
STUBBLEFIELDDavid E. Stubblefield
§ 1264.113 Separation of functions. ( a ) The investigating official, the reviewing official, and any employee or agent of the authority who takes part in investigating, preparing, or presenting a particular case may not, in such case or a factually related case— ( 1 ) Participate in the hearing as the presiding officer;
( 2 ) Participate or advise in the initial decision or the review of the initial decision by the authority head, except as a witness or as the authority representative in the administrative or judicial proceedings; or
( 3 ) Make the collection of penalties and assessments under 31 U.S.C. 3806.
( b ) The presiding officer shall not be responsible to, or subject to the supervision or direction of, the investigating official or the reviewing official.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the representative for the Government must be a member of the legal staff of the authority. Nothing in this paragraph is intended to prevent assistance to the Government representative by attorneys in the NASA organization or other governmental entities.
§ 1271.400 Penalties. ( a ) Any person who makes an expenditure prohibited herein shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $24,496 and not more than $244,958 for each such expenditure.
( b ) Any person who fails to file or amend the disclosure form (see appendix B) to be filed or amended if required herein, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $24,496 and not more than $244,958 for each such failure.
( c ) A filing or amended filing on or after the date on which an administrative action for the imposition of a civil penalty is commenced does not prevent the imposition of such civil penalty for a failure occurring before that date. An administrative action is commenced with respect to a failure when an investigating official determines in writing to commence an investigation of an allegation of such failure.
( d ) In determining whether to impose a civil penalty, and the amount of any such penalty, by reason of a violation by any person, the agency shall consider the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation, the effect on the ability of such person to continue in business, any prior violations by such person, the degree of culpability of such person, the ability of the person to pay the penalty, and such other matters as may be appropriate.
( e ) First offenders under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of $24,496, absent aggravating circumstances. Second and subsequent offenses by persons shall be subject to an appropriate civil penalty between $24,496 and $244,958, as determined by the agency head or his or her designee.
( f ) An imposition of a civil penalty under this section does not prevent the United States from seeking any other remedy that may apply to the same conduct that is the basis for the imposition of such civil penalty.
[55 FR 6737, 6748, Feb. 26, 1990, as amended at 82 FR 28763, June 26, 2017; 82 FR 48762, Oct. 20, 2017; 83 FR 2046, Jan. 16, 2018; 84 FR 13115, Apr. 4, 2019; 85 FR 16546, Mar. 24, 2020; 86 FR 14245, Mar. 15, 2021; 87 FR 23108, Apr. 19, 2022; 88 FR 24906, Apr. 25, 2023; 89 FR 20107, Mar. 21, 2024]
#### PEARCE’S ADMINISTRATOR *v.*BACON.

Note — bill—dispensing with proof.

An assignment of an order for a title bond, with a promise in it to pay $200, if the bond was not obtained in sixty days, is not an instrument within the statute dispensing with proof, &c.

Assumpsit. Bacon held an order on Ward for a title bond for a town lot in Urbana, which he assigned to Pearce in consideration of $200. The assignment had this clause in it: ‘If I should not procure the bond for a title for the within lot from the director of the town of Urbana within sixty days, then I promise to pay said Pearce the above amount.’ Non assumpsit was pleaded without affidavit.

The plaintiff offered to read the note without proving its execution.

Bacon, objected.

*Schench,*replied.

Wood, J.

The instrument is not one described in- the statute dispensing with proof in certain cases, and its execution must be proven, as if the statute had never been enacted.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JORGE GEORGE FRATICELLI,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 441 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              7
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     1,188,821
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              0
<EQUITIES>                                  36,645
<MORTGAGE>                                       0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                           1,330,453
<CASH>                                      15,271
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                         419,374
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      68,426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,132,281
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            822,714
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                        479,790
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  0
<COMMON>                                       340
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 468,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,132,281
<PREMIUMS>                                 117,212
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         18,566
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           2,284
<OTHER-INCOME>                               4,400
<BENEFITS>                                  77,032
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 25,896
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        13,567
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             23,213
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,470
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         17,743
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                17,743
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.47
<RESERVE-OPEN>                             483,539
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         67,644
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            6,769
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                          53,960
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                            604,860
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                       (868)
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-87553, 333-95279, 333-95933, 333-36228, 333-40476, 333-44418, 333-51504, 333-63080, 333-81776, and 333-123861) of Critical Path, Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2006 relating to thefinancial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

April 13, 2007
§ 1261.406 Aggressive collection action; documentation. ( a ) NASA shall take aggressive action, on a timely basis with effective followup, to collect all claims of the United States for money or property arising out of NASA activities, and to cooperate with the other Federal agencies in debt collection activities.
( b ) All administrative collection action shall be documented and the bases for compromise, or for termination or suspension of collection action, should be set out in detail. Such documentation, including the Claims Collection Litigation Report under § 1261.417(e), should be retained in the appropriate claims file.
§ 121.380 Maintenance recording requirements. ( a ) Each certificate holder shall keep (using the system specified in the manual required in § 121.369) the following records for the periods specified in paragraph (c) of this section: ( 1 ) All the records necessary to show that all requirements for the issuance of an airworthiness release under § 121.709 have been met.
( 2 ) Records containing the following information: ( i ) The total time in service of the airframe.
( ii ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the total time in service of each engine and propeller.
( iii ) The current status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, and appliance.
( iv ) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis.
( v ) The identification of the current inspection status of the aircraft, including the times since the last inspections required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained.
( vi ) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives, including the date and methods of compliance, and, if the airworthiness directive involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is required.
( vii ) A list of current major alterations to each airframe, engine, propeller, and appliance.
( b ) A certificate holder need not record the total time in service of an engine or propeller on a transport category cargo airplane, a transport category airplane that has a passenger seat configuration of more than 30 seats, or a nontransport category airplane type certificated before January 1, 1958, until the following, whichever occurs first: ( 1 ) March 20, 1997; or
( 2 ) The date of the first overhaul of the engine or propeller, as applicable, after January 19, 1996.
( c ) Each certificate holder shall retain the records required to be kept by this section for the following periods: ( 1 ) Except for the records of the last complete overhaul of each airframe, engine, propeller, and appliance, the records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for one year after the work is performed.
( 2 ) The records of the last complete overhaul of each airframe, engine, propeller, and appliance shall be retained until the work is superseded by work of equivalent scope and detail.
( 3 ) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold.
( d ) The certificate holder shall make all maintenance records required to be kept by this section available for inspection by the Administrator or any authorized representative of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).
[Doc. No. 10658, 37 FR 15983, Aug. 9, 1972, as amended by Amdt. 121-251, 60 FR 65933, Dec. 20, 1995; Amdt. 121-321, 71 FR 536, Jan. 4, 2006]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10595]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; Salutation Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 6, 1999, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Salutation Consortium, Inc. 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, MicroBurst, Inc., Rockville, MD; TRG Products, Inc., Des 
Moines, IA; Dr. Tomohiro Takagi, Kawasaki-shi Kanagawa-ken, Japan; 
Infrared Data Association, Walnut Creek, CA; Stephen P. Reiss, 
Providence, RI; and Dr. Tamal Bose, Denver, CO have been added as 
parties to this venture. Also, Advanced Peripherals Technologies, Inc., 
Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa-ken, Japan has been dropped as a party to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Salutation Consortium, Inc. intends 
to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On March 30, 1995, Salutation Consortium, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 
6(b) of the Act on June 27, 1995 (60 FR 33233).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 12, 
1999. A notice has not yet been published in the Federal Register.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-10595 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LAUREN PURNELL

,

Defendant Below

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 281, 2016

§

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID 15 0 8003767

§

§

Submitted: Ju ne 13 , 2016

Decided: June 29 , 2016

Before STRINE

, Chief Justice; HOLLAND and SEITZ , Justices.

O R D E R

This 29th day of June 2016 , it appears to the Court that:

(1) On May 31, 2016 , the Court received the appellant Lauren Purnell ’s

notice of appeal from a Superior Court order, dated April 29 , 2016, dismissing her

appeal from a Court of Common Pleas’ sentencing order. The Court of Common

Pleas convicted Purnell of Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree and sentenced

her to t welve months at Level I probation, plus a $ 1 50 fine of which $100 was

suspended, leaving Purnell responsible only for a $50 fine

.

(2) The Clerk of this Court issued a notice under Supreme Court Rule

29(b) directing Purnell to show cause why the appeal s hould not be dismissed for2

this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to consider a criminal appeal that fails to meet the

thresholds set forth in Article IV, § 11(1)(b) of the Delaware Constitution. Purnell

filed a response to the notice to show cause on Ju ne 13

, 201 6

. Sh e argues the

merits of her appeal from the Court of Common Pleas proceeding but fails to

address the jurisdictional defect.

(3) After careful consideration, we conclude that Purnell’s appeal must be

dismissed. Like the Superior Court, 1 t his Court’s constitutional jurisdiction is

limited to criminal appeals when the sentence is “imprisonment exceeding one

month, or fine exceeding One Hundred Dollars.” 2 In Purnell’s case, the Cour t of

Common Pleas’ sentence did not include any term of imprisonment. Purnell was

sentenced only to one year at Level I probation and ordered to pay a $50 fine. This

sentence fails to m eet the jurisdictional threshold. 3 Therefore, the appeal must be

dismissed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice

1 Del. Const. art. IV, § 28.

2 Del. Const. art. IV, § 11(1)(b).

3 Marker v. State , 450 A.2d 397, 398 (Del. 1982).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 18, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 18, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0116. RAKEEM D. MCCAMEY v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2020R0103
Mineral Materials

Open and Closed Areas

Alternative A

0 2 4 8 12 16 20

Miles

Map 62

^ Harlowton

^Roundup

T7N

§¦ ̈

^Pompeys 

Pillar

T1

^Big Timber

N

Billings^

§ ̈¦

T2 Columbus S ^  ̈§¦

^

Bridger

T8S

R18E R29E Montana

T R103W R93W Wyoming 57N

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü

Locatable Withdrawals are processed by Lands

and Realty; as a result Locatable Withdrawals section

is identical to the Lands and Realty Withdrawals section.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Legend

Map scale 1:900,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Mineral Materials Closed

Mineral Materials Open

Interstate

Highway

^ Towns

Public Lands Survey System

94

90

90
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24500 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/12/23 14:21:47 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24500 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/12/23 14:21:47 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24500 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/12/23 14:21:47 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24500 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/12/23 14:21:47 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24500 Filed:06/08/23 Entered:06/12/23 14:21:47 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 5