alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1204.1402 Policy. ( a ) NASA airfields are not normally available to the general public; hence, any use of airfield facilities by aircraft not operated for the benefit of the Federal Government shall be within the sole discretion of the approving authorities.
( b ) Except in the event of a declared in-flight emergency (see § 1204.1406) or as otherwise determined by an approving authority, aircraft not operated for the benefit of the Federal Government are not permitted to land or otherwise use NASA airfield facilities.
( c ) Any use of a NASA airfield facility by aircraft not operated for the benefit of the Federal Government shall be free of charge and no consideration (monetary or otherwise) shall be exacted or received by NASA for such use. However, each user, as a condition of receiving permission to use such airfield facility, shall agree to become familiar with the physical condition of the airfield; abide by the conditions placed upon such use; subject the aircraft, the user, and those accompanying the user to any requirements imposed by NASA in the interest of security and safety while the aircraft or persons are on a NASA facility; use the facilities entirely at the user's own risk; hold the Federal Government harmless with respect to any and all liabilities which may arise as a result of the use of the facilities; and carry insurance covering liability to others in amounts not less than those listed in the Hold Harmless Agreement.
( d ) Permission to use a NASA airfield facility will be granted only in accordance with the limitations and procedures established by an approving authority and then only when such use will not compete with another airport in the vicinity which imposes landing fees or other user charges.
( e ) In no event, except for an in-flight emergency (see § 1204.1406), will permission to use NASA airfield facilities be granted to an aircraft arriving directly from, or destined for, any location outside the continental United States unless previously arranged and approved by the authorized approving official.
( f ) Permission to use NASA airfields may be granted only to those users having the legal capacity to contract and whose aircraft are in full compliance with applicable Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or other cognizant regulatory agency requirements.
( g ) Permission to use NASA airfields, except in connection with a declared in-flight emergency, will consist only of the right to land, park an aircraft, and subsequently take off. NASA is not equipped to provide any other services such as maintenance or fuel and such services will not be provided except following an in-flight emergency.
# Official Journal L 284/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.284.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 284 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5329 October 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.284.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 284

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5329 October 2010

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 861/2010 of 5 October 2010 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 861/2010 of 5 October 2010 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 26, 2012

t1217 

# Order

December 26, 2012

145903

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145903

COA: 304694

Jackson CC: 10

- 005615

- FC

KENNETH DAVID COATSWORTH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 31, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         166,713
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  927,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (450,078)
<INVENTORY>                                    259,904
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,426,962
<PP&E>                                       4,598,164
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,888,370)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,961,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,085,884
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,712,792
<COMMON>                                        82,063
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,038,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,961,040
<SALES>                                      1,710,323
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,710,323
<CGS>                                        1,312,260
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,603,419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,482
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,482
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .003
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .003
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES v. FACTORS & FINANCE CO.

[73 C.Cls. 707; 288 U.S. 89]

*762Mr. Justice Cardozo

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court.
#### § 121.342 Pitot heat indication systems.

No person may operate a transport category airplane or, after December 20, 1999, a nontransport category airplane type certificated after December 31, 1964, that is equipped with a flight instrument pitot heating system unless the airplane is also equipped with an operable pitot heat indication system that complies § 25.1326 of this chapter in effect on April 12, 1978.

[Doc. No. 28154, 60 FR 65932, Dec. 20, 1995]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                           OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       224,859
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1,257,848
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  177,234       
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,971,903
<PP&E>                                     8,670,847         
<DEPRECIATION>                               427,059       
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            16,368,983
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     13,770,164          
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                   4,343,209
<OTHER-SE>                                         0       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              16,368,983          
<SALES>                                    1,565,226         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,565,226
<CGS>                                      1,746,987
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,044,215         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             183,731      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           146,215      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (1,647,602)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (1,647,602)      
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,647,602)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.268)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.268)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,134,197                       0
<SECURITIES>                                 1,277,725                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,234,194                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   226,586                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     43,172                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,763,064                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,095,573                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,373,718                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,376,270                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       764,519                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,132,033                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,373,718                       0
<SALES>                                      1,105,169                 362,513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,544,354               3,908,578
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,825,013               3,264,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,801                  21,906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,719,341                 644,456
<INCOME-TAX>                                   603,010                 222,917
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,116,331                 421,539
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,116,331                 421,539
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .16                     .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16                     .06


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 747

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 747.305 Effectiveness of suspension or removal until completion of hearing.

Any notice of suspension or prohibition issued under § 747.303 and any order of removal or prohibition issued under § 747.304 will be effective upon service on the concerned party and will remain effective and outstanding until the completion of any hearing or appeal authorized under section 206(i) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1786(i)) and this subpart, unless such notice of suspension or order of removal is terminated by the NCUA Board.

[56 FR 37767, Aug. 8, 1991; 57 FR 523, Jan. 7, 1992]
§ 121.485 Flight time limitations: Three or more pilots and an additional flight crewmember. ( a ) Each certificate holder conducting flag operations shall schedule its flight hours to provide adequate rest periods on the ground for each pilot who is away from his base and who is a pilot on an airplane that has a crew of three or more pilots and an additional flight crewmember. It shall also provide adequate sleeping quarters on the airplane whenever a pilot is scheduled to fly more than 12 hours during any 24 consecutive hours.
( b ) The certificate holder conducting flag operations shall give each pilot, upon return to his base from any flight or series of flights, a rest period that is at least twice the total number of hours he flew since the last rest period at his base. During the rest period required by this paragraph, the air carrier may not require him to perform any duty for it. If the required rest period is more than seven days, that part of the rest period in excess of seven days may be given at any time before the pilot is again scheduled for flight duty on any route.
( c ) No pilot may fly as a flight crewmember more than— ( 1 ) 350 hours during any 90 consecutive days; or
( 2 ) 1,000 hours during any 12-calendar-month period.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19217, Dec. 31, 1964; 30 FR 3639, Mar. 19, 1965, as amended by Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2612, Jan. 26, 1996]
WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund II for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Principal Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Principal Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/     LEO F. WELLS, III                                        
|Leo F. Wells, III Principal Executive Officer November 13, 2006  
|                                                                 
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                                       
|Douglas P. Williams Principal Financial Officer November 13, 2006
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 10405 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Rosalba Sotelo,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:22

- CR

- 26

- 1

**_______________________ _______**  Before **Higginbotham, Stewart,** and **Southwick,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
The attorney appointed to represent Rosalba Sotelo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sotelo has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to all ow us to make a fair evaluation of Sotelo ’s claim of ineffective assistance of

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 13, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10405 Document: 00517000070 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/13/2023No. 23

- 10405

2 counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Sotel o ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , cou nsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R**

. 42.2. Case: 23-10405 Document: 00517000070 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/13/2023
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2237

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA97-1809-S)

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia,

United States Attorney, Tamera Lynn Fine, OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing this

action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Wilder v. Shalala, No. CA-97-1809-S (D. Md. Aug.

25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Report to the Congress Regarding Conditions in Burma and U.S. Policy Toward Burma

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the requirements set forth under the heading “Policy Toward Burma” in section 570(d) of the FY 1997 Foreign Operations Appropriations Act, as contained in the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act (Public Law 104-208), a report is required every 6 months following enactment concerning:

1) progress toward democratization in Burma;

2) progress on improving the quality of life of the Burmese people, including progress on market reforms, living standards, labor standards, use of forced labor in the tourism industry, and environmental quality; and

3) progress made in developing a comprehensive, multilateral strategy to bring democracy to and improve human rights practices and the quality of life in Burma, including the development of a dialogue between the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) and democratic opposition groups in Burma.

                        You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit the report fulfilling these requirements to the appropriate committees of the Congress and to arrange for publication of this memorandum in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

[FR Doc. 00-10707

Billing code 4710-10-M
§ 1230.114 Cooperative Research. ( a ) Cooperative research projects are those projects covered by this policy that involve more than one institution. In the conduct of cooperative research projects, each institution is responsible for safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects and for complying with this policy.
( b ) ( 1 ) Any institution located in the United States that is engaged in cooperative research must rely upon approval by a single IRB for that portion of the research that is conducted in the United States. The reviewing IRB will be identified by the Federal department or agency supporting or conducting the research or proposed by the lead institution subject to the acceptance of the Federal department or agency supporting the research.
( 2 ) The following research is not subject to this provision: ( i ) Cooperative research for which more than single IRB review is required by law (including tribal law passed by the official governing body of an American Indian or Alaska Native tribe); or
( ii ) Research for which any Federal department or agency supporting or conducting the research determines and documents that the use of a single IRB is not appropriate for the particular context.
( c ) For research not subject to paragraph (b) of this section, an institution participating in a cooperative project may enter into a joint review arrangement, rely on the review of another IRB, or make similar arrangements for avoiding duplication of effort.