alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       18
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    19
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      19
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                          18
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        19
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 1245.201 Objectives.

Whenever a claim of infringement of privately owned rights in patented inventions or copyrighted works is asserted against NASA, all necessary steps shall be taken to investigate and to administratively settle, deny, or otherwise dispose of such claim prior to suit against the United States. The General Counsel, or designee, is authorized to investigate, settle, deny, or otherwise dispose of all claims of patent and copyright infringement, pursuant to the above-cited statutory authority.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000797975
<NAME> ARMOR-ALL-PRODUCTS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          41,656
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,757)
<INVENTORY>                                     13,646
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,688
<PP&E>                                          15,031
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,062)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,252
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           213
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     128,346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,414
<SALES>                                         39,772
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,772
<CGS>                                           18,225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,478
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,668
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,961
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,707
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 300/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.300.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 300 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5317 November 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.300.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 300

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5317 November 2010

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1030/2010 of 17 November 2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1030/2010 of 17 November 2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3723

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Posting’’. Texas, as the ‘‘Vaughn Gross Post Office Build- al Service located at 8135 Forest Lane in Dallas,

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3723

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 8135 Forest Lane in Dallas, Texas, as the

‘‘Vaughn Gross Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3723 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 8135 Forest Lane in Dallas, Texas, shall be

4 known and designated as the ‘‘Vaughn Gross Post Office

5 Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Vaughn Gross Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 29,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2018392EN.01001901.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — DenizBank v Council

(Case T-798/14) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Inclusion of the name of the entity owning the applicant in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - EU-Turkey Association Agreement - Fundamental rights - Proportionality))

(2018/C 392/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: DenizBank A.Ş. (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: O. Jones, D. Heaton, Barristers, R. Mattick, S. Utku, Solicitors, and M. Lester QC)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: initially S. Boelaert and A. de Elera-San Miguel Hurtado, and subsequently S. Boelaert and P. Mahnič Bruni, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Gauci, L. Havas and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 13), as amended by Council Decision 2014/659/CFSP of 8 September 2014 (OJ 2014 L 271, p. 54), by Council Decision 2014/872/CFSP of 4 December 2014 (OJ 2014 L 349, p. 58), by Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2431 of 21 December 2015 (OJ 2015 L 334, p. 22), by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/1071 of 1 July 2016 (OJ 2016 L 178, p. 21) and by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2315 of 19 December 2016 (OJ 2016 L 345, p. 65) and, secondly, of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 1), as amended by Council Regulation (EU) No 960/2014 of 8 September 2014 (OJ 2014 L 271, p. 3) and by Council Regulation (EU) No 1290/2014 of 4 December 2014 (OJ 2014 L 349, p. 20), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders DenizBank A.Ş. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders DenizBank A.Ş. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2396

MARY LAMAR, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: August 19, 2009 Decided: August 31, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glen D. Wasserstein, IMMIGRATION LAW GROUP, PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Michelle Gorden LaTour, Assistant Director, Timothy G. Hayes, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Mary Lamar, a native and citizen of Trinidad and Tobago, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals reversing the Immigration Judge’s decision and denying cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b) (2006). We have reviewed the administrative record and the arguments Lamar raises in her petition and conclude that we are without jurisdiction to review the Board’s determination. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), (D) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales , 435 F.3d 475, 479-80 (4th Cir. 2006); Obioha v. Gonzales , 431 F.3d 400, 405 (4th Cir. 2005). We accordingly dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DISMISSED
§ 135.611 IFR operations at locations without weather reporting. ( a ) If a certificate holder is authorized to conduct helicopter IFR operations, the Administrator may authorize the certificate holder to conduct IFR helicopter air ambulance operations at airports with an instrument approach procedure and at which a weather report is not available from the U.S. National Weather Service (NWS), a source approved by the NWS, or a source approved by the FAA, subject to the following limitations: ( 1 ) The certificate holder must obtain a weather report from a weather reporting facility operated by the NWS, a source approved by the NWS, or a source approved by the FAA, that is located within 15 nautical miles of the airport. If a weather report is not available, the certificate holder may obtain weather reports, forecasts, or any combination of them from the NWS, a source approved by the NWS, or a source approved by the FAA, for information regarding the weather observed in the vicinity of the airport;
( 2 ) Flight planning for IFR flights conducted under this paragraph must include selection of an alternate airport that meets the requirements of §§ 135.221 and 135.223;
( 3 ) In Class G airspace, IFR departures with visual transitions are authorized only after the pilot in command determines that the weather conditions at the departure point are at or above takeoff minimums depicted in a published departure procedure or VFR minimum ceilings and visibilities in accordance with § 135.609.
( 4 ) All approaches must be conducted at Category A approach speeds as established in part 97 or those required for the type of approach being used.
( b ) Each helicopter air ambulance operated under this section must be equipped with functioning severe weather detection equipment, unless the pilot in command reasonably determines severe weather will not be encountered at the destination, the alternate destination, or along the route of flight.
( c ) Pilots conducting operations pursuant to this section may use the weather information obtained in paragraph (a) to satisfy the weather report and forecast requirements of § 135.213 and § 135.225(a).
( d ) After completing a landing at the airport at which a weather report is not available, the pilot in command is authorized to determine if the weather meets the takeoff requirements of part 97 of this chapter or the certificate holder's operations specification, as applicable.
[Doc. No. FAA-2010-0982, 79 FR 9975, Feb. 21, 2014, as amended by Amdt. 135-131, 79 FR 43622, July 28, 2014; Amdt. 135-141, 84 FR 35823, July 25, 2019]
Order filed January 3, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00735-CR

____________

CORDARRELL CHARLES CARROLL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 149th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 69718

ORDER

Appellant is represented by retained counsel, Lott J. Brooks, III. No 

reporter’s record has been filed in this case. Stacy Thomas, the official court 

reporter for the 149th District Court, informed this court that appellant had not 

made arrangements for payment for the reporter’s record. On November 13, 2013, 

the clerk of this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those 

issues that do not require a reporter’s record unless appellant, within 15 days of 
notice, provided this court with proof of payment for the record. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply. 

Accordingly, we order appellant’s retained counsel, Lott J. Brooks, III, to 

file a brief in this appeal on or before February 3, 2014. If Lott J. Brooks, III,

does not timely file the brief as ordered, we will abate this appeal for a hearing in 

the trial court. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b).

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund II (the Registrant) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|/S/    LEO F. WELLS,
III                                   
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief
Executive Officer August 10, 2006  
|                                                           
|/S/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMS                                 
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial Officer August 10, 2006
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________ No. 96-40193 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LEWIS WILLARD SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

(1:95-CR-93)

_________________________________________________________________ January 16, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Lewis Willard Smith appeals his conviction for possessing with the intent to distribute marijuana. He contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized after his traffic stop. Our review of the record and the arguments and authorities convinces us that the district court’s refusal to suppress theNo. 96-40193 - 2 - marijuana found in the search was not error. See United States v. Kelley , 981 F.2d 1464, 1467-72 (5th Cir. 1993). AFFIRMED.
§ 107.9 Safety event reporting. No later than 10 calendar days after an operation that meets the criteria of either paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, a remote pilot in command must report to the FAA, in a manner acceptable to the Administrator, any operation of the small unmanned aircraft involving at least: ( a ) Serious injury to any person or any loss of consciousness; or
( b ) Damage to any property, other than the small unmanned aircraft, unless one of the following conditions is satisfied: ( 1 ) The cost of repair (including materials and labor) does not exceed $500; or
( 2 ) The fair market value of the property does not exceed $500 in the event of total loss.
[Docket FAA-2015-0150, Amdt. 107-1, 81 FR 42209, June 28, 2016, as amended by Docket No. FAA-2022-1355; Amdt. No. 107-10; 87 FR 75846, Dec. 9 2022]
Parent Letter

Dear (Name of Parent/Guardian ): I am writing to ask y ou to complete a survey of parents /guardians who applied for a private school scholarship through the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program (OSP). After you complete the survey , we will mail you a check for $20 in appreciation of your time spent on this effort
. Th e survey

is part of a study

of the OSP that is required by Congress , to help us learn whether the program is effective. T he survey asks questions about what you looked for when choosing a school and your child’s or children’s current school experiences, whether they received an OSP scholarship or not. If yo u applied for more than one child, y ou will need to complete a survey for each chi ld (and will receive $20 for each completed survey).

When y ou applied to the program for a scholarship, y ou agreed that y ou and y our child(ren) would participate in this study over the next few years. T his spring at their schools, each child who applied for an OSP scholarship in 2011 will take a test; those who were in grades 4
- 12 last spring will also complete a brief survey about themselves and their school experiences. All answers by

y ou or yo ur child are completel y confidential . F indings from the survey s and tests will only

be reported i n summary and will not identify you or your child
. Westat and its partners, as the U.S. Department’s OSP evaluation contractors, are required by law to uphold all federal laws regarding privacy and confidentiality
. If you have an y questions or need help completing th is survey , please contact Laura Prinslow, Research Associate at Westat (phone: 1 - 888 - xxx - xxxx ; email : <email address> )
. Thank y ou for participating in this important evaluation
. Sincerel y, The survey

should take approximately **X** minutes. We ask that y ou complete it by **Y** date. The easiest way

to fill out the survey

is on the web:

 Go to www.(name of website).com.  E nter the unique username and password we have assigned to, listed below:

Username: Password: If you would prefer a paper version of the survey, please email, (insert email address), or call 888
- xxx - xxxx .Juanita Lucas - McLean

Project Director
§ 1261.504 Interagency requests. ( a ) Requests to NASA by other Federal agencies for administrative offset should be in writing and forwarded to the Office of the NASA Comptroller, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546.
( b ) Requests by NASA to other Federal agencies holding funds payable to the debtor should be in writing and forwarded, certified return receipt, as specified by that agency in its regulations; however, if such rule is not readily available or identifiable, the request should be submitted to that agency's office of legal counsel with a request that it be processed in accordance with their internal procedures.
( c ) Requests to and from NASA should be processed within 30 calendar days of receipt. If such processing is impractical or not feasible, notice to extend the time period for another 30 calendar days should be forwarded 10 calendar days prior to the expiration of the first 30-day period.
( d ) Requests from or to NASA must be accompanied by a certification that the debtor owes the debt (including the amount) and that the provisions of (or comparable to) subpart 1261.5 or subpart 1261.6, as applicable, have been fully complied with. NASA will cooperate with other agencies in effecting collection.
**Exhibit 32.2****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**I, Juliet M. Reising, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Verso Technologies,Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 1.        The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2005(the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and  2.        The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: August 8, 2005     /s/Juliet M. Reising     Juliet M. Reising,
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Form 20-F of our Report dated January 31, 2001, and to the
incorporation of our reports included in this Form 20-F, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8, File Nos. 33-85168,
333-09292 and 333-74321. It should be noted that we have not audited any
financial statements of the Company subsequent to November 30, 2000 or performed
any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.

                                          /s/ Arthur Andersen

Edinburgh, Scotland
May 29, 2001