Revised Final 

Fourth Quarter 2012 - Quarterly 

Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Outside Tunnel Wells 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

DOH Facility ID: 9-102271 

DOH Release ID: 990051, 010011, and 020028 

January 2013 

Department of the Navy 

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 

Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853, CTO 0002 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Revised Final 

Fourth Quarter 2012 - Quarterly 

Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Outside Tunnel Wells 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

DOH Facility ID: 9-102271 

DOH Release ID: 990051, 010011, and 020028 

January 2013

Prepared for: 

Department of the Navy 

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 

Prepared by: 

Environmental Science International, Inc. 

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304 

Kailua, HI 96734 

Prepared under: 

Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853, CTO 0002
This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM,4Q2012 Status Report Page v January 2013 

REVISED FINAL 

FOURTH QUARTER 2012 - QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 

OUTSIDE TUNNEL WELLS 

RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY

Long-Term Groundwater and Soil Vapor Monitoring 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint-Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

Prepared for: 

Department of the Navy 

Commanding Officer, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 

Prepared by: 

Environmental Science International, Inc. 

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304 

Kailua, HI 96734 

(808) 261-0740 

Prepared under: 

Contract Number: N62742-12-D-1853 

Contract Task Order: 0002 

Approval Signature: 

 Darren Uchima, Navy Technical Representative Date 

Approval Signature: 1/17/13 

 Robert Chong, ESI Project Manager Date 

Approval Signature: 1/17/13 

 Traci Sylva, ESI QA Manager Date 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM,4Q2012 Status Report Page vi January 2013 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM,4Q2012 Status Report Page vii January 2013 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Section Title Page

ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1

 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1

1.1 Site Description 1-1

1.2 Physical Settings 1-2

1.3 Background 1-3

 

2.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 2-1

2.1 Groundwater Sampling 2-1

2.2 Analytical Results 2-1

2.3 Waste Disposal 2-2

3.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 3-1

3.1 Data Validation and Assessment 3-1

3.2 Data Assessment and Usability Conclusions 3-3

 

4.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4-1

5.0 FUTURE WORK 5-1

 

6.0 REFERENCES 6-1
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM,4Q2012 Status Report Page viii January 2013 

LIST OF TABLES 

Number Title Page

1.1 Current Status of USTs 1-2

2.1 Analytical Results for Groundwater Sampling (November 7, 2012) 2-3

3.1 Quality Control Results for Groundwater Sampling (November 7, 2012, 

2012) 

3-5

 

 

LIST OF FIGURES 

Number Title 

1 Site Location 

2 Site Layout 

 

 

APPENDICES 

Appendix Title 

A Groundwater Sampling Logs 

B Field Notes 

C Laboratory Reports 

D Waste Disposal Manifest 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM,4Q2012 Status Report Page ix January 2013 

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 

ACRONYMS/ 

ABBREVIATIONS DEFINITION/MEANING 

% percent 

COPC Contaminant of Potential Concern 

DLNR State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources 

DOH State of Hawaii Department of Health 

DON Department of the Navy 

EAL Environmental Action Level 

EPA Environmental Protection Agency 

ESI Environmental Science International 

F-76 Marine Diesel Fuel 

ID Identification 

JBPHH Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam 

JP-5 Jet Fuel Propellant-5 

JP-8 Jet Fuel Propellant-8 

LCS Laboratory Control Sample 

LCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate 

LOD Limit of Detection 

LOQ Limit of Quantitation 

μg/L micrograms per Liter 

MS Matrix Spike 

MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate 

NAVFAC Naval Facilities Engineering Command 

NAVSUP FLC Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center 

N.D. Not Detected 

PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons 

PARCCS Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Completeness, Comparability, 

and Sensitivity 

pH hydrogen activity 

QC Quality Control 

RHSF Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

RPD Relative Percent Difference 

SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan 

TEC The Environmental Company, Inc. 

TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel 

TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline 

U.S. United States of America 

UST Underground Storage Tank 

VOC Volatile Organic Compounds 

WP Work Plan 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM,4Q2012 Status Report Page x January 2013 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report ES-1 January 2013

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

This quarterly monitoring report presents the results of the fourth quarter 2012 groundwater 

sampling event conducted on November 7, 2012, at the outside tunnel wells of the Red Hill Bulk 

Fuel Storage Facility [RHSF], Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam [JBPHH], Hawaii. The RHSF is 

located in Halawa Heights on the Island of Oahu. There are 18 active and 2 inactive underground 

storage tanks located at the RHSF. The State of Hawaii Department of Health [DOH] Facility 

Identification [ID] number is 9-102271. The DOH Release ID numbers are 990051, 010011, and 

020028. 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under Naval Facilities Engineering Command [NAVFAC] Contract 

Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved Work 

Plan [WP]/Sampling and Analysis Plan [SAP] prepared by Environmental Science International 

[ESI]. 

On November 7, 2012, Environmental Science International [ESI] personnel collected 

groundwater samples from two outside tunnel monitoring wells (wells HDMW2253-03 and 

OWDFMW01). A summary of the analytical results is provided below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel [TPH-d] (25 micrograms per Liter 

[μg/L]) and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline [TPH-g] (15 μg/L) were detected. None 

of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the DOH 

Environmental Action Levels [EALs]. 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d (2,500 μg/L), TPH-g (17 μg/L), naphthalene (0.025 μg/L), and benzene 

(0.38 μg/L) were detected. TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs for 

both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination. 

Since the wells were last sampled (July 2012), with the exception of TPH-d, groundwater 

contaminant concentrations remained at low concentrations and did not change significantly, or 

were not detected. TPH-d concentrations increased substantially in well OWDFMW01. This was 

the highest TPH-d concentration detected since quarterly groundwater monitoring was initiated in 

2009. TPH-d concentrations increased from non-detect (less than 80.8 μg/L) during the last round 

of sampling to 2,500 μg/L during this round of sampling. 

Based on the results of the assessment, we recommend continuing the groundwater monitoring 

program at the RHSF. If TPH-d concentrations in well OWDFMW01 continue to increase, we 

recommend increasing monitoring frequency to monthly even though well OWDFMW01 is not 

included in the RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report ES-2 January 2013

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 1-1 January 2013

SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION 

This quarterly monitoring report presents the results of the fourth quarter 2012 groundwater 

sampling event conducted on November 7, 2012, at the outside tunnel wells of the RHSF, 

JBPHH, Hawaii. The RHSF is located in Halawa Heights on the Island of Oahu. The purpose of 

the sampling is to (1) assess the condition of groundwater beneath and in the vicinity of the 

RHSF with respect to chemical constituents associated with jet fuel propellant and marine diesel 

fuel, and (2) to ensure the Navy remains in compliance with DOH Underground Storage Tank 

[UST] release response requirements as described in Hawaii Administrative Rules 11-281 

Subchapter 7, Release Response Action (DOH, 2000). The DOH Facility ID number for the 

RHSF is 9-102271. The DOH Release ID numbers are 990051, 010011, and 020028. 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under NAVFAC Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling 

was conducted in accordance with the approved WP/SAP prepared by ESI (ESI, 2012). 

1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION

The RHSF is located on federal government land (zoned F1- Military and Federal), located in 

Halawa Heights, approximately 2.5 miles northeast of Pearl Harbor (Figure 1). It is located on a 

low ridge on the western edge of the Koolau Mountain Range that divides Halawa Valley from 

Moanalua Valley. The RHSF is bordered on the north by Halawa Correctional Facility and 

private businesses, on the west by the United States of America [U.S.] Coast Guard reservation, 

on the south by residential neighborhoods, and on the east by Moanalua Valley. A quarry is 

located less than a quarter mile away to the northwest. The RHSF occupies 144 acres of land 

and the majority of the site is at an elevation of approximately 200 to 500 feet above mean sea 

level. 

The RHSF contains 18 active and 2 inactive USTs, which are operated by Naval Supply 

Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center [NAVSUP FLC] Pearl Harbor (formerly Fleet and 

Industrial Supply Center). Each UST has a capacity of approximately 12.5 million gallons. The 

RHSF is located approximately 100 feet above the basal aquifer. The USTs contain Jet Fuel 

Propellant-5 [JP-5], Jet Fuel Propellant-8 [JP-8], and Marine Diesel Fuel [F-76]. The current 

status of each of the USTs is summarized in Table 1.1. 

Two groundwater monitoring wells (well HDMW2253-03 and OWDFMW01) are located outside 

of the RHSF tunnel system (Figure 2). Well HDMW2253-03 is located at the Halawa 

Correctional Facility (outside the RHSF) and well OWDFMW01 is located at the Oily Waste 

Disposal Facility near Adit 3. Five groundwater monitoring wells (wells RHMW01, RHMW02, 

RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01) are located within the RHSF lower access tunnel. 

(Monitoring data for the five wells located inside the tunnel are included in a separate report.) 

Monitoring wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05 are located inside the 

underground tunnels. Monitoring well RHMW2254-01 is located inside the infiltration gallery of 

the Department of the Navy [DON] Well 2254-01. DON Well 2254-01 is located approximately 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 1-2 January 2013

2,400 feet downgradient of the USTs and provides approximately 24 percent [%] of the potable 

water to the Pearl Harbor System, which serves approximately 52,200 military customers. 

NAVFAC Public Works Department operates the infiltration gallery and DON Well 2254-01. 

TABLE 1.1 

Current Status of the USTs 

Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Reporting – Outside Tunnel Wells 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Tank Identification Fuel Type Status Capacity 

F-1 None Inactive 12.5 million gallons 

F-2 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-3 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-4 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-5 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-6 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-7 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-8 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-9 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-10 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-11 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-12 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-13 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-14 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-15 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-16 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-17 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-18 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-19 None Inactive 12.5 million gallons 

F-20 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-76 Marine Diesel Fuel 

JP-5 Jet Fuel Propellant-5 

JP-8 Jet Fuel Propellant-8

1.2 PHYSICAL SETTINGS

Climatological conditions in the area of the RHSF consist of warm to moderate temperatures 

and low to moderate rainfall. The RHSF is leeward of the prevailing northeasterly trade winds. 

The average annual precipitation is approximately 40 inches, which occurs mainly between 

November and April (State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources [DLNR], 

1986). Annual pan evaporation is approximately 75 inches (DLNR, 1985). Average 

temperatures range from the low 60’s to high 80’s (degrees Fahrenheit) (Atlas of Hawaii, 1983). 

Oahu consists of the eroded remnants of two shield volcanoes, Waianae and Koolau. The 

RHSF is located on the southwest flank of the Koolau volcanic shield. Lavas erupted during the 

shield-building phase of the volcano belong to the Koolau Volcanic Series (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1935). Following formation of the Koolau shield, a long period of volcanic quiescence occurred, 

during which the shield was deeply eroded. Following this erosional period, eruptive activity 

resumed. Lavas and pyroclastic material erupted during this period belong to the Honolulu 

Volcanic Series (Stearns and Vaksvik, 1935). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 1-3 January 2013

In the immediate area of the RHSF, Koolau Volcanic Series lavas dominate, although there are 

consolidated and unconsolidated non-calcareous deposits in the vicinity that consist of alluvium 

generated during erosion of the Koolau volcanic shield. South-southwest of the Site, and in 

isolated exposures to the west, are pyroclastic deposits formed during eruptions from three 

Honolulu Volcanic Series vents, Salt Lake, Aliamanu, and Makalapa (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1935). Based on established geology and records of the drilled wells (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1938), the RHSF is underlain by Koolau Volcanic Series basalts. 

The area of the RHSF is classified as Rock Land, where 25 to 90% of the land surface is 

covered by exposed rock and there are only shallow soils (Foote, et al., 1972). 

Groundwater in Hawaii exists in two principal types of aquifers. The first and most important 

type, in terms of drinking water resources, is the basal aquifer. The basal aquifer exists as a 

lens of fresh water floating on and displacing seawater within the pore spaces, fractures, and 

voids of the basalt that forms the underlying mass of each Hawaiian island. In parts of Oahu, 

groundwater in the basal aquifer is confined by the overlying caprock and is under pressure. 

Waters that flow freely to the surface from wells that tap the basal aquifer are referred to as 

artesian. 

The second type of aquifer is the caprock aquifer, which consists of various kinds of unconfined 

and semi-confined groundwater. Commonly, the caprock consists of a thick sequence of nearly 

impermeable clays, coral, and basalt, which separates the caprock aquifer from the basal 

aquifer. The impermeable nature of these materials and the artesian nature of the basal aquifer 

severely restrict the downward migration of groundwater from the upper caprock aquifer. In the 

area of the RHSF, there is no discernible caprock. 

Shallow groundwater in the area of the RHSF is part of the Waimalu Aquifer System of the Pearl 

Harbor Aquifer Sector. The aquifer is classified as a basal, unconfined, flank-type; and is 

currently used as a drinking water source. The aquifer is considered fresh with less than 250 

milligrams per liter of chloride and is considered an irreplaceable resource with a high 

vulnerability to contamination (Mink and Lau, 1990). 

The nearest drinking water supply well is the DON Well 2254-01, located in the infiltration 

gallery within the RHSF. DON Well 2254-01 is located approximately 2,400 feet downgradient of 

the USTs (Figure 2). 

1.3 BACKGROUND

The RHSF was constructed by the U.S. Government in the early 1940s. Twenty USTs and a 

series of tunnels were constructed to supply fuel to the Navy. The USTs were constructed of 

steel and they currently contain JP-5, JP-8, and F-76. Several tanks in the past have stored 

DON special fuel oil, DON distillate, aviation gasoline, and motor gasoline (Environet, 2010). 

The fueling system is a self-contained underground unit that was installed into native rock 

comprised primarily of basalt with some interbedded tuffs and breccias (Environet, 2010). Each 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 1-4 January 2013

UST measures approximately 245 feet in height and 100 feet in diameter. The upper domes of 

the tanks lie at a depth varying between 100 feet and 200 feet below ground surface. 

In response to increasing concentrations of Contaminant of Potential Concerns [COPCs] in the 

groundwater monitoring wells within the facility (specifically RHMW02) during the 2008 sampling 

events, quarterly groundwater monitoring was initiated in 2009 at the outside tunnel wells. 

In 2009, groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW04, OWDFMW01, and 

HDMW2253-03. Samples were collected in August and October 2009. None of the COPCs 

were detected at concentrations exceeding the gross contamination or drinking water toxicity 

DOH EALs. 

In 2010, groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW04, OWDFMW01, and 

HDMW2253-03. Samples were collected from well RHMW04 in January and April 2010. 

Samples were collected from well OWDFMW01 in January, April, and October 2010. Samples 

were collected from well HDMW2253-03 in January, April, July and October 2010. The COPCs 

concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the gross contamination 

and drinking water toxicity DOH EAL in January 2010 (The Environmental Company, Inc. 

[TEC], 2010a). 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the gross contamination and 

drinking water toxicity DOH EALs in January and April 2010 (TEC, 2010a; TEC, 2010b). 

In 2011, groundwater samples were collected from wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03. 

Samples were collected in January, April, July, and October 2011. None of the COPCs were 

detected at concentrations exceeding the gross contamination or drinking water toxicity DOH 

EALs 

In 2012, groundwater samples were collected from wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03. 

Samples were collected in January, April, and July 2012. TPH-d was detected at a 

concentration above the DOH EALs in samples collected from wells HDMW2253-03 and 

OWDFMW01 (Environet, 2012). The COPCs concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are 

summarized below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the gross contamination 

and drinking water toxicity DOH EAL in April 2012. 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the gross contamination and 

drinking water toxicity DOH EAL in April 2012. 

1.3.1 Previous Reports 

The following groundwater monitoring reports were previously submitted to the DOH: 

1. Groundwater Monitoring Report, August 2009 (submitted September 2009). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 1-5 January 2013

2. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2009 (submitted December 2009). 

3. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January, 2010 (submitted April 2010). 

4. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2010 (submitted May 2010). 

5. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2010 (submitted August 2010). 

6. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2010 (submitted December 2010). 

7. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2011 (submitted March 2011). 

8. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2011 (submitted June 2011). 

9. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2011 (submitted September 2011). 

10. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2011 (submitted December 2011). 

11. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2012 (submitted March 2012). 

12. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2012 (submitted July 2012). 

13. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2012 (submitted August 2012). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 1-6 January 2013

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 2-1 January 2013

SECTION 2 – GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 

On November 7, 2012, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from two monitoring wells 

(wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03). The samples were collected in accordance with DOH 

UST release response requirements and the RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan (TEC, 2008). 

Generally, the depth to groundwater in the wells is measured using an oil/water interface probe 

prior to sampling; however, the Solinst 122 oil/water interface probe that was provide as part of 

the contract was not long enough to measure the depth to groundwater in well OWDFMW01. 

Thus, the depth to water in well OWDFMW01 was not measured. The DLNR measured the 

depth to water and depth to bottom of well HDMW2253-03 using their Geotech oil/water 

interface probe. The measurements are included in the groundwater sampling log. No 

measurable product or petroleum hydrocarbon odor was observed in either well. 

2.1 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Prior to collecting groundwater samples, disposable bailers were used to purge groundwater 

from the monitoring wells. The wells were purged at a rate of 0.22 and 0.38 liters per minute. 

Water quality parameters were monitored on a periodic basis during well purging. The water 

quality parameters that were measured included hydrogen activity [pH], temperature, 

conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and oxidation reduction potential. The water quality parameters 

were evaluated to demonstrate that the natural characteristics of the aquifer formation water 

were present within the monitoring well before collecting the sample. At least four readings were 

collected during the purging process. Purging was considered complete when at least three 

consecutive water quality measurements stabilized within approximately 10%. The readings 

were recorded on groundwater monitoring logs which are included in Appendix A. The field 

notes are included in Appendix B. 

When the water quality parameters stabilized, groundwater samples were collected from the 

wells. The disposable bailers were used to collect the groundwater samples from the monitoring 

wells. For each monitoring well, the groundwater samples were collected no more than two 

hours after purging was completed to prevent groundwater interaction with the monitoring well 

casing and atmosphere. Samples collected for dissolved lead were filtered in the field using a 

peristaltic pump and a 0.45 micron filter. 

2.2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS

The samples were analyzed for TPH-d using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] 

Method 8015M, TPH-g and Volatile Organic Compounds [VOCs] using EPA Method 8260B, 

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons [PAHs] using EPA Method 8270C SIM, and dissolved lead 

using EPA Method 6020. The analytical results are summarized below and in Table 2.1. A copy 

of the laboratory report is included in Appendix C. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 2-2 January 2013

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-d (25 μg/L) and TPH-g (15 μg/L) were detected. None of the 

chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the gross 

contamination or drinking water toxicity DOH EALs. 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d (2,500 μg/L), TPH-g (17 μg/L), naphthalene (0.025 μg/L), and 

benzene (0.38 μg/L) were detected. TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH 

EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination. 

2.2.1 Groundwater Contaminant Trends 

 HDMW2253-03 – Both TPH-d and TPH-g were detected; however, both were detected at 

low concentrations. TPH-g had not been detected in previous sampling events. TPH-d 

concentrations detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. 

 OWDFMW01 – With the exception of TPH-d, groundwater contaminant concentrations 

remained at low concentrations and did not change significantly, or were not detected. TPH-d 

concentrations detected during this round of sampling were the highest concentrations 

detected since quarterly groundwater monitoring was initiated in 2009. TPH-d concentrations 

increase from non-detect (less than 80.8 μg/L) during the last round of sampling to 2,500 

μg/L during this round of sampling. 

2.3 WASTE DISPOSAL

The purged groundwater and decontamination water generated during sampling of the wells 

was stored in a 55-gallon drum along with the purged water and decontamination water from the 

inside tunnel wells. The drum was stored onsite at Adit 3. On December 10, 2012, the drum of 

water was picked up by Pacific Commercial Services, LLC and disposed at Unitek Solvent 

Services, Inc. The waste disposal manifest is included in Appendix D. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 2-3 

TABLE 2.1 

Analytical Results for Groundwater Sampling (November 7, 2012) 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

November 2012 Quarterly Status Report

Chemical 

Constituent 

OWDFMW01 

(ES007) 

OWDFMW01 

(ES008) 

(Dup) 

HDMW2253-03 

(ES009) LOD 

DOH E

Drinking 

Water 

Toxicity 

Co

TPH-d 2,500 2,500 25 20 190 TPH-g N.D. 17 15 30 100 Naphthalene 0.035 0.025 N.D. 0.05 17 Benzene 0.49 0.38 N.D. 0.5 5 

The data are in micrograms per Liter (μg/L). Shaded values exceeded the DOH EALs. DOH EALs DOH Environmental Action Levels for groundwater where groundwater is a current drinking water source and 

surface water is greater than 150 meters from the site (DOH, Fall 2011).

LOD Limit of Detection N.D. Not Detected TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 2-4 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 3-1 January 2013

SECTION 3 – DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 

A data quality assessment, which consists of a review of the overall groundwater sample 

collection and analysis process, was performed in order to determine whether the analytical 

data generated meet the quality objectives for the project. The field Quality Control [QC] 

program consisted of standardized sample collection and management procedures, and the 

collection of field duplicate samples, matrix spike samples, and trip blank samples. The 

laboratory quality assurance program consisted of the use of standard analytical methods and 

the preparation and analyses of Matrix Spike [MS]/Matrix Spike Duplicate [MSD] samples, 

surrogate spikes, method blanks, Laboratory Control Samples [LCS] and Laboratory Control 

Sample Duplicate [LCSD]. 

3.1 Data Validation and Assessment 

The objective of data validation is to provide data of known quality for project decisions. Data 

quality is judged in terms of its Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Completeness, 

Comparability, and Sensitivity [PARCCS]. A number of factors may affect the quality of data, 

including: sample collection methods, sample analysis methods, and adherence to established 

procedures for sample collection, preservation, management, shipment, and analysis. 

Precision 

Precision is defined as the reproducibility of replicate measurements. Precision is evaluated by 

Relative Percentage Difference [RPD] of field duplicates and laboratory LCS/LCSD or MS/MSD 

results. Field duplicate and MS/MSD samples were collected at a rate of approximately 10% of 

project samples. Field duplicates were sent to the laboratory along with the primary samples. 

For this monitoring event, the RPDs for MS/MSD and LCS/LCSD pairs were all within the 

acceptable range. The RPDs of detected analytes for the primary and field duplicate samples 

(ES007 and ES008) are provided in Table 3.1. All RPDs for the three analytes detected in both 

samples were less than 50% (as recommended in the NAVFAC Project Procedures Manual 

(DON 2007)), although three of the detects (TPH-g, naphthalene, and benzene) were below the 

Limit of Detection [LOD], and thus qualified as estimated (J flag). The fourth analyte, TPH-d was 

detected above the DOH EAL, and with excellent precision (RPD = 0%). Therefore the data 

precision is considered acceptable. 

Accuracy 

Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of a measurement to an accepted reference or 

true value. Accuracy is evaluated through measurement of the percent recovery of an analyte in 

a reference standard or spiked sample. Accuracy limits for surrogates, laboratory control spike, 

MS, and MSD samples are established by the individual laboratory. The acceptance criteria for 

accuracy are dependent on the analytical method and are based on historical laboratory data. 

All of the LCS and surrogate spike recoveries for analyzed constituents were within acceptable 

percent recovery limits. The MS or MSD recoveries for several VOCs were outside of control 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 3-2 January 2013

limits (high recoveries for 1,1-Dichloroethylene, acetone, tetrachloroethylene, and trans-1,2-

dichloroethylene, and low recoveries for 1,1,2-Trichloroethane and for 1,1,2,2-

Tetrachloroethane). All other MS and MSD recoveries were within acceptable recovery limits, 

therefore, the data accuracy for this monitoring event is considered acceptable. 

 

Representativeness 

Representativeness is the degree that data accurately and precisely represents a characteristic 

of a population, parameter variations at a sampling point, or an environmental condition. 

Representativeness was achieved by conducting sampling in compliance with the sample 

collection procedures described in the Work Plan specifically written for this project (ESI, 2012). 

Representativeness is also evaluated through the compliance with the sample holding time, 

sample preservation, and the analysis of blank samples, including method blank and trip blank 

samples. The sample holding time was exceeded for TPH-g and VOCs for both samples due to 

laboratory error, and therefore these results are qualified as estimated because a low bias is 

possible. The sample holding time for TPH-d, PAHs, and lead and sample preservation 

complied with the EPA criteria. For this sampling event, one trip blank was collected to 

determine blank contribution during sample transport for TPH-g and VOCs. There was no 

detection of VOCs in the trip blank. TPH-g was detected in the method blank below the LOD. 

Therefore, the groundwater sample data are considered representative of the groundwater 

quality on site. 

Completeness 

Completeness is defined as the overall percentage of valid analytical results (including 

estimated results) compared to the total number of analytical results reported by the analytical 

laboratory. No data were rejected for this project, and therefore the completeness goal for this 

project (90%), was successfully met. Successful completion of data acquisition can only be 

accomplished if both the field and laboratory portions of the project are performed according to 

the procedures described in the Work Plan (ESI, 2012). 

Comparability 

Comparability expresses the confidence with which one data set can be compared to another 

data set. Comparability can be related to accuracy and precision because these quantities are 

measures of data reliability. Data, with acceptable precision and accuracy, are considered 

comparable if collection techniques, analytical procedures, methods and reporting are 

equivalent. For this monitoring event, the samples were collected using approaches consistent 

with those in the previous events, and the same analytical methods/procedures were used to 

measure the concentration of COPCs. Therefore, the results are considered comparable within 

this data set and with the data collected from previous sampling events. 

Sensitivity 

The Limits of Quantitation [LOQs] are established by the laboratory based on the LODs or 

instrument detection limits, historical data, and EPA limits established for the methods. The 

LOQs for samples may require adjustment due to matrix interference or if high levels of target 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 3-3 January 2013

analytes necessitate dilution before analysis. Matrix interference and sample dilutions have the 

effect of increasing the LOQs. Laboratory LODs and LOQs for several analytes differed from the 

LODs and LOQs in the Work Plan [WP]/Sampling And Analysis Plan [SAP] because the 

laboratory updates them quarterly. LODs and LOQs for several analytes were greater than the 

EALs (as stated in the WP/SAP) and therefore it is not possible to determine whether the 

analytes are present at the EAL. As suggested by the DOH Technical Guidance Manual, the 

project action level will be the LOD for these analytes. 

3.2 Data Assessment and Usability Conclusions 

The PARCCS criteria were evaluated, and with a few exceptions, all criteria were met. These 

exceptions include the exceedances of recovery criteria for MS/MSDs for several VOCs and 

analysis of VOCs outside of the recommended hold time. Since the surrogate recoveries and 

the recoveries of the VOCs in the LCS/LCSD are all within recovery criteria, the MS/MSD 

exceendaces are not considered to affect the usability of the data, but may indicate some matrix 

heterogeneity or inconsistencies due to the missed hold time. There is the possibility of a low 

bias in VOC results due to hold time exceedance, and therefore, this data should be considered 

estimated, and carefully examined in relation to data in previous and future GW monitoring 

events. Since the data are consistent with data from previous events, it appears that the effect 

of this QC exceedance is not substantial, and the data is usable. The data assessment 

concludes that all data generated during this event are usable for the intended use for project 

decisions. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 3-4 January 2013

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 3-5 

TABLE 3.1 

Quality Control Results for Groundwater Sampling (November 7, 2012

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

November 2012 Quarterly Status Report

Method Chemical Constituent 

DOH EALs OWDFM01 (ES007) OWDFMW01 

Drinking 

Water 

Toxicity 

Gross 

Contamination Results Q LOQ LOD DL Results Q LO

EPA 8015B TPH-d 190 100 2,500 HD 50 20 15 2,500 HD 5EPA 8260B TPH-g 100 100 N.D. BU,B 50 30 13 17 BU,U 5EPA 8270C SIM (PAHs) Naphthalene 17 21 0.035 J 2 0.05 0.23 0.025 J 2 EPA 8260B (VOCs) Benzene 5 170 0.49 BU,J 1 0.5 0.14 0.38 BU,J 1 EPA 6020 Lead 15 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.2 0.0898 N.D. U 1 

The data are in micrograms per Liter (μg/L). Shaded values exceeded the DOH EALs.- Not Analyzed B Analyte was present in the associated method blank. BU Sample analyzed after holding time expired. DL Detection Limit. DOH EALs DOH Environmental Action Levels for groundwater where groundwater is a current drinking water source and surface water is greater than 150 meters from the site (DOH, FHD The chromatic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard. J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the LOQ and above the DL. Reported value is estimated. LOD Limit of Detection. LOQ Limit of Quantitation.N.D. Not Detected Q Qualifier. TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasolineTPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as dieselU Undetected at DL and is reported as less than the LOD. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 3-6 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 4-1 January 2013

SECTION 4 – SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

This quarterly monitoring report presents the results of groundwater sampling conducted on 

November 7, 2012, at the RHSF, JBPHH, Hawaii. The RHSF is located in Halawa Heights on 

the Island of Oahu. The DOH Facility ID number for the RHSF is 9-102271. The DOH Release 

ID numbers are 990051, 010011, and 020028. 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under NAVFAC Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling 

was conducted in accordance with the approved WP/SAP prepared by ESI. 

On November 7, 2012, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from two monitoring wells 

(wells HDMW2253-03 and OWDFMW01). A summary of the analytical results is provided 

below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-d (25 μg/L) and TPH-g (15 μg/L) were detected. None of the 

chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d (2,500 μg/L), TPH-g (17 μg/L), naphthalene (0.025 μg/L), and 

benzene (0.38 μg/L) were detected. TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH 

EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination. 

Groundwater Contaminant Trends 

 HDMW2253-03 – Both TPH-d and TPH-g were detected; however, both were detected at 

low concentrations. TPH-g had not been detected in previous sampling events. TPH-d 

concentrations detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. 

 OWDFMW01 – With the exception of TPH-d, groundwater contaminant concentrations 

remained at low concentrations and did not change significantly, or were not detected. 

TPH-d concentrations detected during this round of sampling were the highest 

concentrations detected since quarterly groundwater monitoring was initiated in 2009. 

TPH-d concentrations increase from non-detect (less than 80.8 μg/L) during the last round 

of sampling to 2,500 μg/L during this round of sampling. 

Conclusions and Recommendations 

Since the wells were last sampled (July 2012), with the exception of TPH-d, groundwater 

contaminant concentrations in wells HDMW2253-03 and OWDFMW01 remained at low 

concentrations and did not change significantly, or were not detected. TPH-d concentrations 

increased substantially in well OWDFMW01. 

Based on the results of the assessment, we recommend continuing the groundwater monitoring 

program at the RHSF. If TPH-d concentrations in well OWDFMW01 continue to increase, we 

recommend increasing monitoring frequency to monthly even though well OWDFMW01 is not 

included in the RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 4-2 January 2013

A copy of this report will be submitted to the DOH and a copy will be kept on file at NAVFAC. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 5-1 January 2013

SECTION 5 – FUTURE WORK 

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Future work includes the first quarter 2013 groundwater monitoring in January 2013. It is 

anticipated that the quarterly groundwater monitoring status report will be submitted in February 

2013. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 5-2 January 2013

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 6-1 January 2013

SECTION 6 – REFERENCES 

Atlas of Hawaii, 1983, Department of Geography, University of Hawaii Press. 

DLNR, 1985, Pan Evaporation: State of Hawai’i 1894-1983: Report R74, Division of Water and 

Land Development, August 1995. 

DLNR, 1986, Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii: Report R76, Division of Water and Land Development, 

June 1986. 

DOH, 2000, Hawaii Department of Health, Technical Guidance Manual for Underground 

Storage Tank Closure and Release Response, March 2000. 

DOH, 2011, Screening for Environmental Hazards at Sites with Contaminated Soil and 

Groundwater, Hawai'i Department of Health, Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response, 

December 2011. 

DON, 2007, Project Procedures Manual, U.S. Navy Installation Restoration Program, NAVFAC 

Pacific, Prepared for Pacific Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC Pacific), 

February 2007. 

Environet, 2010, Work Plan, Long-Term Monitoring, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl 

Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, September 2010. 

Environet, 2012, Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report-Outside (Non-Tunnel Wells), Red 

Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, July 2012. 

ESI, 2012, Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl 

Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, October 2012. 

Foote et al., 1972, Soil Survey of the Islands of Kauai, Oahu, Maui, Molokai, and Lanai, State of 

Hawaii. 

Mink, J. F. and Lau, L. S., 1990, Aquifer Identification and Classification for Oahu: Groundwater 

Protection Strategy for Hawaii: Water Resources Research Center Technical Report No. 179, 

February 1990. 

Stearns, H. T. and Vaksvik, K. N., 1935, Geology and Groundwater Resources of the Island of 

Oahu, Hawaii: Hawaii Div. Hydrogr. Bull. 

Stearns, H. T. and Vaksvik, K. N., 1938, Records of the Drilled Wells on the Island of Oahu, 

Hawaii: Hawaii Div. Hydrogr. Bull. 4, 213 p. 

TEC, 2008, Final Groundwater Protection Plan, Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Prepared for 

Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, January 2008. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2012 Status Report 6-2 January 2013

TEC, 2010a, Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells, Prepared 

for Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, April 2010. 

TEC, 2010b, Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells, Prepared 

for Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, May 2010. 
FIGURES 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
KAENA POINT KAHUKU MAKAHA MAILI NANAKULI WAIANAE BARBERS POINT EWA BEACH HONOLULU INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WAIKIKI DIAMOND HICKAM AFB KAPOLEI EWA MOKULEIA HALEIWA WAIMEA POINT LAIE PUNALUU KAAAWA WAIAHOLE KANEOHE BAY KANEOHE MOKAPU KAILUA WAIMANALO MAKAPUU POINT HAWAII KAHALA KAI HONOLULU WAHIAWA SCHOFIELD BARRACKS PEARL CITY 83 930 803 99 80 780 83 61 63 78 72 61 83 836 76 63 780 93 930 750 99 H3 H1 H1 H1 H2 (RESIDENTIAL HOUSING) 

LAWA 

ONAL 

ILITY NAVY FIRING RANGE RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY 

GRAPHIC SCALE 900 0 900 Scale in Feet The accuracy of this document is limited to the quality and scale of the source information. This document is not a legal representation of an engineered survey. NOTES SOURCES Pearl Harbor Base Map Navy GIS files PROJECT LOCATION FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION GROUNDWATER MONITORING RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEM COMMAND (NAVSUP) FLEET LOGISTICS CENTER JBPHH, OAHU, HAWAII
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
RHMW05 RHMW04 HDMW2253-03 SVMP04 SVMP06 SVMP12 SVMP14 SVMP16 SVMP18 SVMP20 SVMP17 SVMP15 SVMP11 SVMP09 SVMP07 SVMP05 SVMP03 RHMW03 (RESIDENTIAL HOUSING) 

RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY SVMP13 SVMP08 HALAWA 

CTIONAL 

ACILITY NAVY FIRING RANGE 

RHMW01 SVMP02 RHMW02 SVMP10 GRAPHIC SCALE 1,200 0 1,200 Scale in Feet The accuracy of this document is limited to the quality and scale of the source information. This document is not a legal representation of an engineered survey. NOTES RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY HALAWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY HALAWA STREAM BUILDING ROAD ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK WATER TANK SOIL VAPOR MONITORING POINT GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL BOARD OF WATER SUPPLY PUMP STATION LEGEND SOURCES Pearl Harbor Base Map Navy GIS files FIGURE 2 SITE LAYOUT GROUNDWATER MONITORING RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEM COMMAND (NAVSUP) FLEET LOGISTICS CENTER JBPHH, OAHU, HAWAII
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX A 

Groundwater Sampling Logs 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

- Date: 11/7/2012 800

OWDFMW01

-

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l)

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

Windy, Partly Cloudy

Disposable Bailer

Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

12.50

12.67

12.75

- 0.35 L/min

-

-

810

820

12.30

12.52

3.235

3.262

824

829

832

0

2

4

6

8

3.289

3.323

5.25

5.60

5.05

5.00

5.03

3.285

24.19

24.13

23.97

24.19

24.81 1.68

1.70

1.72

1.72

1.74

-164.3

-185.4

-185.4

-186.4

-187.6

TPH-g, TPH-d - 8015; VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270C

lead - 6020

ES007 [0830], ES008 (Dup) [0900], ES008 MS/MSD [0900]

Clear

Low

Slight

16 - VOAs, 6 - 1L amber jar, 4 - 500ml amber jar, 4 - 500ml HDPE bottle

Disposable Bailer

Triple Rinsed

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

re
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

208.2 ft Date: 11/7/2012 1115

HDMW2253-03

1575 ft Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

- Sunny

- Disposable Bailer

- 0.22 L/min

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l) Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

1118 0 9.25 0.492 1.50 22.99 0.24 -217.5

1123 1 8.96 0.477 1.43 22.59 0.23 -195.7

1127 2 8.95 0.475 1.53 22.45 0.23 -179.0

1132 3 8.93 0.474 1.33 22.4 0.23 -178.7

1136 4 8.93 0.474 1.35 22.44 0.23 -173.0

Clear

Low

Slight

TPH-g, TPH-d, - 8015; VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270C

Disposable Bailer

lead - 6020

ES009 [1200]

Triple Rinsed

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

6 - VOAs, 2 - 1L amber jar, 1 - 500ml amber jar, 1 - 500ml HDPE bottle

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

re
APPENDIX B 

Field Notes 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.


APPENDIX C 

Laboratory Reports 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Analytical Report For

Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

Client Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066

Attention: Robert Chong

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

WORK ORDER NUMBER: 12-11-0711

Richard Villafania

Project Manager

11/19/2012

Page 1 of 34
Contents

Client Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066

Work Order Number: 12-11-0711

1 Client Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

1.1 EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

1.2 EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

1.3 EPA 8270C SIM PAHs (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

1.4 GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

2 12-11-0711 Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

3 Quality Control Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

3.1 MS/MSD and/or Duplicate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

3.2 LCS/LCSD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

4 Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

5 Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

Page 2 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: 12-11-0711 Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES007 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 11/07/12 08:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-1

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 11/12/12 00:00 11/13/12 13:12 121112L03D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES008 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 11/07/12 09:00

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-2

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 11/12/12 00:00 11/13/12 13:09 121112L03D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES009 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 11/07/12 12:00

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-3

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 11/12/12 00:00 11/13/12 13:15 121112L03D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 11/14/12 11:47

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-14-497-7

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 11/12/12 00:00 11/13/12 12:30 121112L03D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 3 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: 12-11-0711 Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES007 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 11/07/12 08:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-1

TPH as Diesel 2500 HD 15 20 50 1 11/12/12 00:00 11/16/12 13:45 121112B06

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES008 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 11/07/12 09:00

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-2

TPH as Diesel 2500 HD 15 20 50 1 11/12/12 00:00 11/16/12 14:00 121112B06

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES009 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 11/07/12 12:00

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-3

TPH as Diesel 25 HD,J 15 20 50 1 11/12/12 00:00 11/16/12 14:15 121112B06

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 11/16/12 15:12

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-15-516-14

TPH as Diesel <20 U 15 20 50 1 11/12/12 00:00 11/12/12 16:53 121112B06

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 4 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-11-0711

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES007 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:11/07/12 08:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-1

Naphthalene 0.035 J 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.026 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.028 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Acenaphthylene <0.050 U 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Acenaphthene <0.050 U 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Fluorene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Phenanthrene <0.050 U 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Anthracene <0.050 U 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Pyrene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Chrysene <0.050 U 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 93% 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 71% 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 108% 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:54 121113L08

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 5 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-11-0711

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES008 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:11/07/12 09:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-2

Naphthalene 0.025 J 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.026 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.028 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Acenaphthylene <0.050 U 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Acenaphthene <0.050 U 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Fluorene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Phenanthrene <0.050 U 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Anthracene <0.050 U 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Pyrene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Chrysene <0.050 U 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 86% 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 73% 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 99% 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:21 121113L08

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 6 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-11-0711

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES009 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:11/07/12 12:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-3

Naphthalene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.026 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.028 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Acenaphthylene <0.050 U 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Acenaphthene <0.050 U 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Fluorene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Phenanthrene <0.050 U 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Anthracene <0.050 U 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Pyrene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Chrysene <0.050 U 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 96% 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 88% 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 106% 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 17:48 121113L08

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 7 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 099-15-148

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:11/14/12 14:27

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-15-148-4

Naphthalene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.026 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.028 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Acenaphthylene <0.050 U 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Acenaphthene <0.050 U 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Fluorene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Phenanthrene <0.050 U 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Anthracene <0.050 U 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Pyrene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Chrysene <0.050 U 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 99% 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 95% 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 107% 11/13/12 00:00 11/14/12 16:28 121113L08

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 8 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-11-0711

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES007 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:11/07/12 08:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-1

Acetone <10 BU,U 10 10 20 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Benzene 0.49 BU,J 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 BU,J 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Bromoform <1.0 BU,U 0.50 1.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Bromomethane <5.0 BU,U 3.9 5.0 20 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

2-Butanone <5.0 BU,U 2.2 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 BU,U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Chlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Chloroethane <5.0 BU,U 2.3 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Chloroform <0.50 BU,U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Chloromethane <5.0 BU,U 1.8 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 BU,U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.0 BU,U 1.2 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 BU,U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 BU,U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 BU,U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 BU,U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Ethylbenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Methylene Chloride <1.0 BU,U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 BU,U 4.4 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Styrene <0.50 BU,U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Toluene <0.50 BU,U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 BU,U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 BU,U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Trichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 9 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-11-0711

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES007 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:11/07/12 08:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-1

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 BU,U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 BU,U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

p/m-Xylene <1.0 BU,U 0.30 1.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

o-Xylene <0.50 BU,U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 BU,U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Gasoline Range Organics <30 BU,U 13 30 50 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 95% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 115% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 98% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 100% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 91% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:52 121116L02

-Sample analyzed outside recommended holding time.

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 10 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-11-0711

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES008 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:11/07/12 09:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-2

Acetone <10 BU,U 10 10 20 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Benzene 0.38 BU,J 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 BU,U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Bromoform <1.0 BU,U 0.50 1.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Bromomethane <5.0 BU,U 3.9 5.0 20 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

2-Butanone <5.0 BU,U 2.2 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 BU,U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Chlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Chloroethane <5.0 BU,U 2.3 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Chloroform <0.50 BU,U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Chloromethane <5.0 BU,U 1.8 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 BU,U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.0 BU,U 1.2 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 BU,U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 BU,U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 BU,U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 BU,U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Ethylbenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Methylene Chloride <1.0 BU,U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 BU,U 4.4 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Styrene <0.50 BU,U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Toluene <0.50 BU,U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 BU,U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 BU,U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Trichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 11 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-11-0711

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES008 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:11/07/12 09:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-2

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 BU,U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 BU,U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

p/m-Xylene <1.0 BU,U 0.30 1.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

o-Xylene <0.50 BU,U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 BU,U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Gasoline Range Organics 17 BU,B, 13 30 50 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 92% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 109% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 96% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 99% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 95% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 06:24 121116L02

-Sample analyzed outside recommended holding time.

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 12 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-11-0711

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES009 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:11/07/12 12:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-3

Acetone <10 BU,U 10 10 20 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Benzene <0.50 BU,U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 BU,U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Bromoform <1.0 BU,U 0.50 1.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Bromomethane <5.0 BU,U 3.9 5.0 20 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

2-Butanone <5.0 BU,U 2.2 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 BU,U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Chlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Chloroethane <5.0 BU,U 2.3 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Chloroform <0.50 BU,U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Chloromethane <5.0 BU,U 1.8 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 BU,U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.0 BU,U 1.2 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 BU,U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 BU,U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 BU,U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 BU,U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Ethylbenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Methylene Chloride <1.0 BU,U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 BU,U 4.4 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Styrene <0.50 BU,U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Toluene <0.50 BU,U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 BU,U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 BU,U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Trichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 13 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-11-0711

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES009 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:11/07/12 12:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-3

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 BU,U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 BU,U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

p/m-Xylene <1.0 BU,U 0.30 1.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

o-Xylene <0.50 BU,U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 BU,U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Gasoline Range Organics 15 BU,B, 13 30 50 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 110% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 113% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 96% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 99% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 95% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 07:21 121116L02

-Sample analyzed outside recommended holding time.

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 14 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-11-0711

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES TRIP Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:11/07/12 08:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-4

Acetone <10 BU,U 10 10 20 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Benzene <0.50 BU,U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 BU,U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Bromoform <1.0 BU,U 0.50 1.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Bromomethane <5.0 BU,U 3.9 5.0 20 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

2-Butanone <5.0 BU,U 2.2 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 BU,U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Chlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Chloroethane <5.0 BU,U 2.3 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Chloroform <0.50 BU,U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Chloromethane <5.0 BU,U 1.8 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 BU,U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.0 BU,U 1.2 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 BU,U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 BU,U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 BU,U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 BU,U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Ethylbenzene <0.50 BU,U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Methylene Chloride <1.0 BU,U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 BU,U 4.4 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Styrene <0.50 BU,U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Toluene <0.50 BU,U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 BU,U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 BU,U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 BU,U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Trichloroethene <0.50 BU,U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 15 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 12-11-0711

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES TRIP Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:11/07/12 08:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

12-11-0711-4

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 BU,U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 BU,U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

p/m-Xylene <1.0 BU,U 0.30 1.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

o-Xylene <0.50 BU,U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 BU,U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Gasoline Range Organics 17 BU,B, 13 30 50 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 108% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 111% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 93% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 94% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 94% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:56 121116L02

-Sample analyzed outside recommended holding time.

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations 

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 16 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 099-13-057

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:11/17/12 08:53

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-13-057-2

Acetone <10 U 10 10 20 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Bromomethane <5.0 U 3.9 5.0 20 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Chloromethane <5.0 U 1.8 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.0 U 1.2 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 17 of 34
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 099-13-057

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 11/09/12 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:11/17/12 08:53

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-13-057-2

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.30 1.0 10 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Gasoline Range Organics 17 J 13 30 50 1 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 103% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 105% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 96% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 99% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 94% 11/16/12 00:00 11/17/12 05:27 121116L02

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 18 of 34
 12-11-0711 CASE NARRATIVE

Due to laboratory error, the Volatiles analyses by EPA Method 8260B were performed 

outside the analytical holding time for all samples and flagged with a “BU” qualifier. The 

samples were collected in unpreserved 40ml vials with a holding time of seven days. 

Corrective measures have been implemented in the laboratory to address this issue. A 

copy of the Corrective Action Report for this event will be sent to Environmental Science 

International upon completion. 

Return to Contents

Page 19 of 34
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 12-11-0711

Method: EPA 6020

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Date Received: 11/09/12

Quality Control Sample ID

ES008

MS/MSD Batch

Number

121112S03

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

11/13/12

Date

Prepared

11/12/12

Instrument

ICP/MS 03

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Lead ND 100.0 106.9 107 111.2 111 80-120 4 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 20 of 34
Quality Control - PDS / PDSD

Work Order No: 12-11-0711

Method: EPA 6020

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Date Received 11/09/12

Quality Control Sample ID

ES008

PDS / PDSD Batch

Number

121112S03

Matrix

Aqueous

Date Analyzed

11/13/12

Date

Prepared

11/12/12

Instrument

ICP/MS 03

Analysis Comment: * - Analyzed 11/14/2012 2:34:37 PM

%REC

CL

Parameter PDS RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

%REC

PDSD

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

SAMPLE

CONC

PDSD

CONC

PDS CONC

Lead ND 100.0 111.1 111 109.4 109 75-125 2 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 21 of 34
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 12-11-0711

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Date Received: 11/09/12

Quality Control Sample ID

ES008

MS/MSD Batch

Number

121112S06A

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

11/16/12

Date

Prepared

11/12/12

Instrument

GC 46

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

TPH as Diesel 2451 4000 6803 109 6026 89 55-133 12 0-30

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 22 of 34
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 12-11-0711

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Date Received: 11/09/12

Quality Control Sample ID

ES008

MS/MSD Batch

Number

121113S08

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

11/14/12

Date

Prepared

11/13/12

Instrument

GC/MS AAA

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Naphthalene ND 2.000 1.261 63 1.257 63 21-133 0 0-25

2-Methylnaphthalene ND 2.000 1.334 67 1.337 67 21-140 0 0-25

1-Methylnaphthalene ND 2.000 1.514 76 1.482 74 20-140 2 0-25

Acenaphthylene ND 2.000 1.689 84 1.680 84 33-145 1 0-25

Acenaphthene ND 2.000 1.578 79 1.574 79 49-121 0 0-25

Fluorene ND 2.000 1.909 95 1.862 93 59-121 2 0-25

Phenanthrene ND 2.000 2.047 102 2.043 102 54-120 0 0-25

Anthracene ND 2.000 1.389 69 1.394 70 27-133 0 0-25

Fluoranthene ND 2.000 2.092 105 2.104 105 26-137 1 0-25

Pyrene ND 2.000 2.311 116 2.290 114 18-168 1 0-25

Benzo (a) Anthracene ND 2.000 2.445 122 2.453 123 33-143 0 0-25

Chrysene ND 2.000 2.293 115 2.303 115 17-168 0 0-25

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene ND 2.000 2.445 122 2.422 121 24-159 1 0-25

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene ND 2.000 2.428 121 2.430 121 24-159 0 0-25

Benzo (a) Pyrene ND 2.000 2.204 110 2.180 109 17-163 1 0-25

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene ND 2.000 2.211 111 2.220 111 10-171 0 0-25

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene ND 2.000 2.028 101 1.999 100 10-219 1 0-25

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene ND 2.000 2.071 104 2.043 102 10-227 1 0-25

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 23 of 34
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 12-11-0711

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Date Received: 11/09/12

Quality Control Sample ID

ES008

MS/MSD Batch

Number

121116S02

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

11/17/12

Date

Prepared

11/16/12

Instrument

GC/MS LL

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Acetone ND 50.00 102.8 206 105.5 211 40-140 3 0-20 3

Benzene ND 50.00 44.26 89 46.46 93 80-120 5 0-20

Bromodichloromethane ND 50.00 47.41 95 49.16 98 75-120 4 0-20

Bromoform ND 50.00 48.28 97 52.31 105 70-130 8 0-20

Bromomethane ND 50.00 70.31 141 58.92 118 30-145 18 0-20

2-Butanone ND 50.00 52.22 104 49.51 99 30-150 5 0-20

Carbon Tetrachloride ND 50.00 53.53 107 56.71 113 65-140 6 0-20

Chlorobenzene ND 50.00 47.39 95 47.73 95 80-120 1 0-20

Chloroethane ND 50.00 56.47 113 58.78 118 60-135 4 0-20

Chloroform ND 50.00 51.56 103 52.80 106 65-135 2 0-20

Chloromethane ND 50.00 56.57 113 60.99 122 40-125 8 0-20

Dibromochloromethane ND 50.00 48.92 98 49.89 100 60-135 2 0-20

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND 50.00 32.13 64 31.59 63 50-130 2 0-20

1,2-Dibromoethane ND 50.00 49.09 98 49.81 100 80-120 1 0-20

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 44.81 90 46.68 93 70-120 4 0-20

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 42.65 85 44.86 90 75-125 5 0-20

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 41.74 83 43.33 87 75-125 4 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethane ND 50.00 44.63 89 46.88 94 70-135 5 0-20

1,2-Dichloroethane ND 50.00 52.01 104 52.94 106 70-130 2 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 66.12 132 74.53 149 70-130 12 0-20 3

c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 45.63 91 48.90 98 70-125 7 0-20

t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 44.61 89 45.81 92 60-140 3 0-20

1,2-Dichloropropane ND 50.00 45.47 91 46.60 93 75-125 2 0-20

c-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.00 39.69 79 39.87 80 70-130 0 0-20

t-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.00 41.91 84 42.38 85 55-140 1 0-20

Ethylbenzene ND 50.00 49.55 99 49.91 100 75-125 1 0-20

Methylene Chloride ND 50.00 47.41 95 49.09 98 55-140 3 0-20

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone ND 50.00 42.72 85 43.64 87 60-135 2 0-20

Styrene ND 50.00 45.06 90 45.89 92 65-135 2 0-20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.00 51.13 102 50.93 102 80-130 0 0-20

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.00 1.098 2 0.9609 2 65-130 13 0-20 3

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 24 of 34
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 12-11-0711

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Date Received: 11/09/12

Quality Control Sample ID

ES008

MS/MSD Batch

Number

121116S02

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

11/17/12

Date

Prepared

11/16/12

Instrument

GC/MS LL

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Tetrachloroethene ND 50.00 90.31 181 89.72 179 45-150 1 0-20 3

Toluene ND 50.00 46.52 93 46.07 92 75-120 1 0-20

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 50.00 36.49 73 37.98 76 65-135 4 0-20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 50.00 51.25 103 52.91 106 65-130 3 0-20

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene ND 50.00 45.54 91 47.37 95 50-140 4 0-20

1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 50.00 34.50 69 32.85 66 75-125 5 0-20 3

Trichloroethene ND 50.00 87.71 175 90.23 180 70-125 3 0-20 3

1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 50.00 47.08 94 47.91 96 75-125 2 0-20

Vinyl Chloride ND 50.00 60.39 121 63.10 126 50-145 4 0-20

p/m-Xylene ND 100.0 103.9 104 103.2 103 75-130 1 0-20

o-Xylene ND 50.00 51.77 104 51.80 104 80-120 0 0-20

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ND 50.00 45.75 92 47.79 96 65-125 4 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 25 of 34
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: EPA 6020

12-11-0711

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

11/12/12

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

ICP/MS 03 121112L03D

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

11/13/12

Quality Control Sample ID

099-14-497-7

Parameter %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers LCS

%REC

LCSD

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

Lead 100.0 103.0 103 101.6 102 80-120 1 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 26 of 34
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

12-11-0711

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

11/12/12

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC 46 121112B06

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

11/12/12

Quality Control Sample ID

099-15-516-14

Parameter %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers LCS

%REC

LCSD

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

TPH as Diesel 4000 3654 91 3496 87 60-132 4 0-11

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 27 of 34
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

12-11-0711

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

11/13/12

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC/MS AAA 121113L08

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

11/14/12

Quality Control Sample ID

099-15-148-4

Parameter %REC CL RPD CL Qualifiers

LCSD

%REC ME_CL RPD

LCS

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

Naphthalene 2.000 1.985 99 1.980 99 21-133 2-152 0 0-25

2-Methylnaphthalene 2.000 2.110 106 2.099 105 21-140 1-160 1 0-25

1-Methylnaphthalene 2.000 2.201 110 2.247 112 20-140 0-160 2 0-25

Acenaphthylene 2.000 1.874 94 1.891 95 33-145 14-164 1 0-25

Acenaphthene 2.000 1.873 94 1.889 94 55-121 44-132 1 0-25

Fluorene 2.000 2.037 102 2.011 101 59-121 49-131 1 0-25

Phenanthrene 2.000 2.051 103 2.064 103 54-120 43-131 1 0-25

Anthracene 2.000 1.384 69 1.375 69 27-133 9-151 1 0-25

Fluoranthene 2.000 2.071 104 2.077 104 26-137 8-156 0 0-25

Pyrene 2.000 2.243 112 2.254 113 45-129 31-143 0 0-25

Benzo (a) Anthracene 2.000 2.367 118 2.359 118 33-143 15-161 0 0-25

Chrysene 2.000 2.270 114 2.289 114 17-168 0-193 1 0-25

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene 2.000 2.328 116 2.456 123 24-159 2-182 5 0-25

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene 2.000 2.353 118 2.351 118 24-159 2-182 0 0-25

Benzo (a) Pyrene 2.000 2.125 106 2.128 106 17-163 0-187 0 0-25

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene 2.000 2.179 109 2.173 109 25-175 0-200 0 0-25

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene 2.000 1.868 93 1.823 91 25-175 0-200 2 0-25

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene 2.000 2.013 101 2.001 100 25-157 3-179 1 0-25

LCS ME CL validation result : Pass

Total number of ME compounds allowed : 1

Total number of ME compounds : 0

Total number of LCS compounds : 18

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 28 of 34
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

12-11-0711

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

11/16/12

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC/MS LL 121116L02

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

11/17/12

Quality Control Sample ID

099-13-057-2

Parameter %REC CL RPD CL Qualifiers

LCSD

%REC ME_CL RPD

LCS

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

Acetone 50.00 49.42 99 43.03 86 40-140 23-157 14 0-20

Benzene 50.00 47.19 94 45.41 91 80-120 73-127 4 0-20

Bromodichloromethane 50.00 53.93 108 52.48 105 75-120 68-128 3 0-20

Bromoform 50.00 52.81 106 53.02 106 70-130 60-140 0 0-20

Bromomethane 50.00 57.19 114 53.51 107 30-145 11-164 7 0-20

2-Butanone 50.00 40.34 81 38.81 78 30-150 10-170 4 0-20

Carbon Tetrachloride 50.00 56.47 113 53.73 107 65-140 52-152 5 0-20

Chlorobenzene 50.00 48.83 98 47.57 95 80-120 73-127 3 0-20

Chloroethane 50.00 56.95 114 56.29 113 60-135 48-148 1 0-20

Chloroform 50.00 51.54 103 49.79 100 65-135 53-147 3 0-20

Chloromethane 50.00 53.73 107 51.31 103 40-125 26-139 5 0-20

Dibromochloromethane 50.00 53.34 107 52.11 104 60-135 48-148 2 0-20

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 50.00 46.20 92 45.23 90 50-130 37-143 2 0-20

1,2-Dibromoethane 50.00 49.00 98 47.02 94 80-120 73-127 4 0-20

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 48.43 97 46.36 93 70-120 62-128 4 0-20

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 47.36 95 45.70 91 75-125 67-133 4 0-20

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 46.24 92 43.83 88 75-125 67-133 5 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethane 50.00 46.75 93 45.34 91 70-135 59-146 3 0-20

1,2-Dichloroethane 50.00 52.45 105 52.51 105 70-130 60-140 0 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethene 50.00 49.64 99 47.70 95 70-130 60-140 4 0-20

c-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.00 48.44 97 47.62 95 70-125 61-134 2 0-20

t-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.00 46.38 93 45.54 91 60-140 47-153 2 0-20

1,2-Dichloropropane 50.00 47.80 96 45.69 91 75-125 67-133 5 0-20

c-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.00 43.92 88 42.56 85 70-130 60-140 3 0-20

t-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.00 44.53 89 43.56 87 55-140 41-154 2 0-20

Ethylbenzene 50.00 51.56 103 47.89 96 75-125 67-133 7 0-20

Methylene Chloride 50.00 48.98 98 49.04 98 55-140 41-154 0 0-20

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 50.00 44.95 90 43.44 87 60-135 48-148 3 0-20

Styrene 50.00 47.64 95 45.66 91 65-135 53-147 4 0-20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.00 55.00 110 50.29 101 80-130 72-138 9 0-20

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.00 43.70 87 42.43 85 65-130 54-141 3 0-20

Tetrachloroethene 50.00 52.46 105 50.63 101 45-150 28-168 4 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 29 of 34
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

12-11-0711

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

11/16/12

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC/MS LL 121116L02

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

11/17/12

Quality Control Sample ID

099-13-057-2

Parameter %REC CL RPD CL Qualifiers

LCSD

%REC ME_CL RPD

LCS

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

Toluene 50.00 49.56 99 47.16 94 75-120 68-128 5 0-20

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.00 42.59 85 41.27 83 65-135 53-147 3 0-20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50.00 53.94 108 51.45 103 65-130 54-141 5 0-20

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene 50.00 50.36 101 47.63 95 50-140 35-155 6 0-20

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 50.00 46.81 94 44.11 88 75-125 67-133 6 0-20

Trichloroethene 50.00 50.73 101 47.40 95 70-125 61-134 7 0-20

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 50.00 48.06 96 46.09 92 75-125 67-133 4 0-20

Vinyl Chloride 50.00 60.33 121 58.24 116 50-145 34-161 4 0-20

p/m-Xylene 100.0 107.4 107 103.9 104 75-130 66-139 3 0-20

o-Xylene 50.00 53.23 106 51.93 104 80-120 73-127 2 0-20

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 50.00 46.32 93 45.97 92 65-125 55-135 1 0-20

Gasoline Range Organics 1000 1091 109 1000 100 80-120 73-127 9 0-20

LCS ME CL validation result : Pass

Total number of ME compounds allowed : 2

Total number of ME compounds : 0

Total number of LCS compounds : 44

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 30 of 34
Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers

Work Order Number:

Qualifier Definition

12-11-0711

* See applicable analysis comment.

< Less than the indicated value.

> Greater than the indicated value.

Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to a required sample dilution. Therefore, the sample

data was reported without further clarification.

1

Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank

surrogate spike compound was in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further

clarification.

2

Recovery of the Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) compound was out of control due to

matrix interference. The associated LCS and/or LCSD was in control and, therefore, the sample data was

reported without further clarification.

3

The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to matrix interference. The LCS/LCSD RPD was in control and,

therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification.

4

The PDS/PDSD or PES/PESD associated with this batch of samples was out of control due to a matrix

interference effect. The associated batch LCS/LCSD was in control and, hence, the associated sample

data was reported without further clarification.

5

6 Surrogate recovery below the acceptance limit.

7 Surrogate recovery above the acceptance limit.

B Analyte was present in the associated method blank.

BU Sample analyzed after holding time expired.

The Detection Limit (DL) is the smallest analyte concentration that can be demonstrated to be different

from zero or a blank concentration at the 99% level of confidence.

DL

E Concentration exceeds the calibration range.

ET Sample was extracted past end of recommended max. holding time.

HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard.

ICH Initial calibrtn. verif. recov. above method CL for this analyte.

ICJ Initial calibrtn. verif. recov. below method CL for this analyte.

IH Calibrtn. verif. recov. below method CL for this analyte.

IJ Calibrtn. verif. recov. above method CL for this analyte.

J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the LOQ and above the DL. Reported value is estimated.

The Limit of Detection (LOD) is the smallest amount or concentration of a substance that must be present

in a sample in order to be detected at 99% confidence level.

LOD

The Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) is the lowest concentration of a substance that produces a quantitative

result within specified limits of precision and bias.

LOQ

Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the

sample exceeding the spike concentration by a factor of four or greater.

Q

SG The sample extract was subjected to Silica Gel treatment prior to analysis.

U Undetected at Detection Limit (DL) and is reported as less than the Limit of Detection (LOD).

X % Recovery and/or RPD out-of-range.

Z Analyte presence was not confirmed by second column or GC/MS analysis.

Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not corrected for

% moisture. All QC results are reported on a wet weight basis.

MPN - Most Probable Number

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 31 of 34
Return to Contents

Page 32 of 34
Return to Contents

Page 33 of 34
Return to Contents

Page 34 of 34
APPENDIX D 

Waste Disposal Manifest 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.