alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit4.1**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theuse of our report dated March 29, 2007, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Queenstake Resources Ltd. included in this Annual Reporton Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Annual Report”) and in the Company’sRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-119779), which incorporatesby reference the Annual Report..
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP      |   |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP          |   |   |
| Chartered Accountants               |   |   |
| Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada |   |   |
| March 29, 2007                      |   |   |

 

----
Exhibit 10.23
 RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
 BELL MICROPRODUCTS, INC.
1998 STOCK PLAN
(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED THROUGH APRIL 30, 2002)
 
      Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Unit Award
 Vesting of Restricted Stock




---



##### 



Vesting Date
    
    Cumulative Percentage of Units VestedFirst Anniversary of Date of Award
    
    
    25
    %Second Anniversary of Date of Award
    
    
    50
    %Third Anniversary of Date of Award
    
    
    75
    %Fourth Anniversary of Date of Award
    
    
    100
    %
  General Provisions
 Employment
 Securities Law Compliance
 Mergers, Recapitalizations, Stock Splits, Etc.
 2




---



##### 



Shares Reserved
 Withholding Taxes
 Scope of Agreement
 1998 Stock Plan
 Severability
 3




---



##### 



BELL MICROPRODUCTS, INC.By:Title: Director, Human ResourcesOPTIONEE:SignaturePrint Name 4
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70 -68

 36

 38

 40

 42

 44

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 2000

 2500

 1000

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
#### EAST ORANGE LUMBER CO., APPELLANT, v. CHRISTIAN FEIGENSPAN, RESPONDENT.

Argued October 17, 1939

Decided January 25, 1940.

For the appellant, *Smith & Goldstein.*

For the respondent, *Lindabury, Steelman, Zink & Lafferty.*

*128Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance—The*Chancellor, Trenchard, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague JJ. 12.

*For reversal*—None.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3739 

To provide for matching funds waivers for formula grants and subgrants 

under the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2020 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To provide for matching funds waivers for formula grants 

and subgrants under the Family Violence Prevention and 

Services Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Our Women 

5 and Waive Emergency Requirements Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘POWER Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3739 IS

1 SEC. 2. MATCHING FUNDS WAIVER FOR FORMULA GRANTS 

2 AND SUBGRANTS UNDER THE FAMILY VIO3 LENCE PREVENTION AND SERVICES ACT. 

4 (a) WAIVER OF MATCHING FUNDS FOR AWARDED

5 GRANTS AND SUBGRANTS.—At the request of a State (as 

6 defined in section 302 of the Family Violence Prevention 

7 and Services Act (42 U.S.C. 10402)), the Secretary of 

8 Health and Human Services shall waive— 

9 (1) the non-Federal contributions requirement 

10 under subsection (c)(4) of section 306 of the Family 

11 Violence Prevention and Services Act (42 U.S.C. 

12 10406) with respect to the grants and subgrants 

13 awarded for fiscal years 2019 and 2020 to such 

14 State and the eligible entities within such State 

15 under such section or section 308 of such Act (42 

16 U.S.C. 10408); and 

17 (2) the reporting requirements required for 

18 such subgrants and grants that relate to such non19 Federal contributions requirement. 

20 (b) WAIVER OF MATCHING FUNDS FOR GRANTS

21 AWARDED AFTER DATE OF ENACTMENT.— 

22 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c)(4) of section 

23 306 of the Family Violence Prevention and Services 

24 Act (42 U.S.C. 10406) shall not apply to a qualified 

25 grant during the period of a public health emergency 

26 declared pursuant to section 319 of the Public 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3739 IS

1 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d) resulting from 

2 the COVID–19 pandemic. 

3 (2) QUALIFIED GRANT DEFINED.—In this sub4 section, the term ‘‘qualified grant’’ means a grant or 

5 subgrant awarded— 

6 (A) after the date of enactment of this sec7 tion; and 

8 (B) under section 306, 308, or 309 of the 

9 Family Violence Prevention and Services Act 

10 (42 U.S.C. 10406, 10408, 10409). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 1212.702 The Inspector General. The Inspector General is responsible for: ( a ) Making final Agency determinations on appeals related to records originating with the Office of the Inspector General (§ 1212.400), and
( b ) Authorizing an extension for making a final determination on an appeal related to records originating with the Office of the Inspector General (§ 1212.400(e)).
[77 FR 60622, Oct. 4, 2012]
§ 1252.404 Prohibition against intimidation or retaliation. A recipient may not engage in acts of intimidation or retaliation against any person who: ( a ) Attempts to assert a right protected by the Act or these regulations; or
( b ) Cooperates in any mediation, inquiry, hearing, or other part of NASA's investigation, conciliation, and enforcement process.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Zaxis International Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 (the “Report”), as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ivo Heiden, Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Ivo Heiden

Ivo HeidenPresident and Chief Financial OfficerDated: May 12, 2006

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zaxis International Inc. and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GARY A. FOLEY JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 544 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of December, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### § 1262.304 Comments by other parties.

Any party to a proceeding other than the applicant and agency counsel may file comments about an application within 30 calendar days after it is served, or about an answer within 15 calendar days after it is served. A commenting party may not participate further in proceedings on the application unless the adjudicative officer determines that the public interest requires such participation in order to permit full exploration of matters raised in the comments.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6182

JOHN ARMSTRONG; ROBERT D. BIGGS; STERLING

YOUNGCOURT; KENNY EDMONDS; RONALD JOSEPH

GOVOSTIS; JEFFREY RITTER; MICHAEL SILBERMAN,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; LEHRMAN DOTSON,

Assistant Warden; PARKER, Hearing Officer;

ROBERT KOPPEL, Captain; LOGAN CHANNEY, Captain, all defendants are sued in the individual and official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-97-1541-AW)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Armstrong, Robert D. Biggs, Sterling Youngcourt, Kenny

Edmonds, Ronald Joseph Govostis, Jeffrey Ritter, Michael Silberman,

Appellants Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General,
2

Gloria Selena Wilson-Shelton, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court’s orders denying

relief on their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint and

denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Armstrong v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-1541-AW (D. Md.

Dec. 11, 1997, and Jan. 8, 1998). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### ATTAWAY, administrator, *v.*WEAVER, administrator.

No. 8838.

October 12, 1932.

*773*J. P. Brooke*and *H. B. Moss,*for plaintiff in error.

*Morris & Morris*and *Roberts & Yanduviere,*contra.

Hill, J.

Only the general grounds of the motion for new trial, and the ground that the court did not correctly state the issues of the case to the jury, were argued. The other grounds of the motion were not mentioned, ánd are considered abandoned. On examination of the record it is held that the charge of the court is not subject to the criticism that it did not correctly state the issues involved in the ease. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Russell, Q. J., who*dissents, *and Atkinson, J., absent.*
#### § 125.248 [Reserved]
# Official Journal C 40/2 Fe

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 40 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 612 February 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 40

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 612 February 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 40/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2018/C 40/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 13 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 40/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2018/C 40/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

13

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty.

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### § 1216.309 Mitigation and monitoring.

When the analysis proceeds to an EA or EIS and mitigation measures are adopted for the purpose of avoiding or reducing the significance of environmental impacts, such mitigation measures will be identified in the EA Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) or the EIS Record of Decision (ROD). NASA shall implement mitigation measures (including adaptive management strategies, where appropriate) consistent with applicable FONSIs and/or RODs and shall monitor their implementation and effectiveness. The Responsible Official shall ensure that funding for such mitigation measures is included in the program or project budget.

[89 FR 25502, Apr. 11, 2024]
#### § 811.5 Delivery of Federal Financing Bank securities.

A Reserve Bank which has received Federal Financing Bank securities and effected pledges, made entries regarding them, or transferred or delivered them according to the instructions of its depositor is not liable for conversion or for participation in breach of fiduciary duty even though the depositor had no right to dispose of or take other action in respect of the securities. A Reserve Bank shall be fully discharged of its obligations under this part by the delivery of Federal Financing Bank securities in definitive form to its depositor or upon the order of such depositor. Customers of a member bank or other depository (other than a Reserve Bank) may obtain Federal Financing Bank securities in definitive form only by causing the depositor of the Reserve Bank to order the withdrawal thereof from the Reserve Bank.
§ 1261.315 Procedures for the handling of lawsuits against NASA employees arising within the scope of their office or employment. The following procedures shall be followed in the event that a civil action or proceeding is brought, in any court, against any employee of NASA (or against the estate) for injury or loss of property or personal injury or death, resulting from the NASA employee's activities while acting within the scope of office or employment: ( a ) After being served with process or pleadings in such an action or proceeding, the employee (or the executor(rix) or administrator(rix) of the estate) shall immediately deliver all such process and pleadings or an attested true copy thereof, together with a fully detailed report of the circumstances of the accident giving rise to the court action or proceeding, to the following officials: ( 1 ) The Assistant General Counsel for Litigation insofar as actions or proceedings against employees of NASA Headquarters are concerned; or
( 2 ) The Chief Counsel of the NASA Installation at which the employee is employed, insofar as actions against other than NASA Headquarters employees are concerned.
( b ) Upon receipt of such process and pleadings, the Associate General Counsel for General Law or the Chief Counsel of the NASA installation receiving the same shall furnish to the U.S. Attorney for the district embracing the place where the action or proceeding is brought and, if appropriate, the Director, Torts Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, the following: ( 1 ) Copies of all such process and pleadings in the action or proceeding promptly upon receipt thereof; and
( 2 ) A report containing a statement of the circumstances of the incident giving rise to the action or proceeding, and all data bearing upon the question of whether the employee was acting within the scope of office or employment with NASA at the time of the incident, at the earliest possible date, or within such time as shall be fixed by the U.S. Attorney upon request.
( c ) The Associate General Counsel for General Law or a Chief Counsel acting pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section shall submit the following documents to the General Counsel, who is hereby designated to receive such documents on behalf of the Administrator: ( 1 ) Copies of all process and pleadings submitted to a U.S. Attorney in accordance with paragraph (b).
( 2 ) In addition, where the action or proceeding is for damages in excess of $25,000, or where (in the opinion of the Chief Counsel) such action or proceeding involves a new precedent, a new point of law, or a question of policy, copies of reports and all other papers submitted to the U.S. Attorney.
[45 FR 48104, July 18, 1980, as amended at 82 FR 29384, June 29, 2017]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         123,263
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  597,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (121,311)
<INVENTORY>                                    137,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,271,388
<PP&E>                                       4,278,463
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,128,646)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,702,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,332,310
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     17,130
<COMMON>                                        84,763
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,724,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,702,157
<SALES>                                      4,218,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,646,211
<CGS>                                        3,309,720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,984,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             154,462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (493,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (520,182)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                493,386
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,797)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .003
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .003
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
3TEC Energy Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-49354, 333-53192, and 333-72344) on Form S-8 and in the registration
statement (No. 333-51964) on Form S-3 of 3TEC Energy Corporation and
subsidiaries of our report dated March 26, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of 3TEC Energy Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2001, annual report
on Form 10-K of 3TEC Energy Corporation and subsidiaries.

Our report refers to a change in accounting for derivative financial
instruments, effective January 1, 2001.

KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 29, 2002
§ 1221.113 Use of the NASA Flags. ( a ) The NASA Flag is authorized for use only as follows: ( 1 ) On or in front of NASA buildings.
( 2 ) At NASA ceremonies.
( 3 ) At conferences (including display in NASA conference rooms).
( 4 ) At governmental or public appearances of NASA executives.
( 5 ) In private offices of senior officials.
( 6 ) As otherwise authorized by the NASA Administrator or designee.
( 7 ) The NASA Flag must be displayed with the United States Flag. When the United States Flag and the NASA Flag are displayed on a speaker's platform in an auditorium, the United States Flag must occupy the position of honor and be placed at the speaker's right as the speaker faces the audience, with the NASA Flag at the speaker's left.
( b ) The NASA Administrator's, Deputy Administrator's and Associate Administrator's Flags shall be displayed with the United States Flag in the respective offices of these officials but may be temporarily removed for use at the discretion of the officials concerned.
[58 FR 58944, Nov. 5, 1993, as amended at 85 FR 71831, Nov. 12, 2020]
§ 125.269 Flight attendants. ( a ) Each certificate holder shall provide at least the following flight attendants on each passenger-carrying airplane used: ( 1 ) For airplanes having more than 19 but less than 51 passengers—one flight attendant.
( 2 ) For airplanes having more than 50 but less than 101 passengers—two flight attendants.
( 3 ) For airplanes having more than 100 passengers—two flight attendants plus one additional flight attendant for each unit (or part of a unit) of 50 passengers above 100 passengers.
( b ) The number of flight attendants approved under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section are set forth in the certificate holder's operations specifications.
( c ) During takeoff and landing, flight attendants required by this section shall be located as near as practicable to required floor level exits and shall be uniformly distributed throughout the airplane to provide the most effective egress of passengers in event of an emergency evacuation.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT IN RE: T.R. PETITION OF: T.R. : : : : : No. 913 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 28th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 20 15 - 1935 Directorate ID : 20 14 - SW - 008 - AD Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. Model AB139 and AW139 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 102 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect or prevent a crack in the subfloor frame. Costs:

 The visual inspection would require 2 work- hours for a labor cost of $170 per helicopter. No parts would be needed, so the cost would total $170 per he licopter, $17,340 for the U.S. fleet.

 If there are no cracks, installing the frame reinforcements would require 240 workhours for a labor cost of $20,400 and parts would cost $2,274. The total cost would be $22,674 per helicopter.

 If there is a crack, ins talling the frame reinforcements would require 240 work- hours for a labor cost of $20,400 and parts would cost $3,401. The total cost would be $23,801 per helicopter. Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Ye s ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Pro ject Engineer : Robert Grant
**Exhibit 32.1****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**I, Montgomery Bannerman, Chief Executive Officer of Verso Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), dohereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30,2005 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and  2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: November 8, 2005       /s/ Montgomery Bannerman         Montgomery Bannerman,