alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspect for correct 

piston ring seal 

installation and that 

the piston ring is 

intact.

3.0 $ 255.00 $18 $ 272.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3735 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and modify the 

credit for alternative fuel vehicle refueling property. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2020 

Mr. CARPER (for himself and Mr. ALEXANDER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

and modify the credit for alternative fuel vehicle refueling 

property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing America’s 

5 Clean Fuels Infrastructure’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR ALTERNATIVE FUEL 

7 VEHICLE REFUELING PROPERTY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (g) of section 30C of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3735 IS

1 ‘‘December 31, 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

2 2028’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

5 December 31, 2020. 

6 SEC. 3. MODIFICATION OF CREDIT LIMITATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 30C of 

8 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘with respect to all’’ and insert10 ing ‘‘with respect to any single item of’’, 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘at a location’’, and 

12 (3) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘$30,000 in 

13 the case of a property’’ and inserting ‘‘$200,000 in 

14 the case of any such item of property’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

17 December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,643,861
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,515,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,335,870
<PP&E>                                         868,376
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,890,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,112,196
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,619
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,776,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,890,034
<SALES>                                        272,859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,562,319
<CGS>                                            2,630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,152,509
<INCOME-TAX>                                   811,264
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,142,069
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,341,245
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
<FN>
<F1>FIGURE REPRESENTS BASIC TOTAL.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of RMS Titanic,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on October 8, 2002 (the "Report"),  I, Arnie Geller,  Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Arnie Geller
-------------------------
Arnie Geller
Chief Executive Officer
(LOGO)

America First
CREDIT UNION

Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1998 fiscal year:

(A)I have reviewed the  activities and  performance  of the Servicer  during the
preceding  fiscal  year  under  the  terms  of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement  and/or Seller/Servicer Guide and to
the best of these  Officers'  knowledge,  the Servicer has  fulfilled all of its
duties,  responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements  throughout such
year,  or if there has been a default or failure of the  servicer to perform any
of such duties,  responsibilities or obligations,  a description of each default
or failure and the nature and status  thereof has been  reported to Norwest Bank
Minnesota, N.A.;

(B) I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
servicer in good standing;

(c) I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions  Insurance
Policy and any other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing  Agreement,
Trust Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer  Guide
are in full force and effect;

(D) All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy (if
applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable),  with respect
to each Mortgaged Property,  have been paid and that all such insurance policies
are in full force and effect;

(E) All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any other  expenses
accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance  on any
Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid,  or if any such costs or expenses have not
been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the reason for the non-payment
has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N~.;

(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G) All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property
required  per  section  605GH,  6050J and 6050P of the  Internal  Revenue  Code,
respectively, have been prepared and filed.


Chief Financial Officer

Title

April 14, 1999

Date

With You In Mind

P.O. BOX 9338 * OGDEN,  UT 84409 * (801)  778-8485 * SALT LAKE CITY,  UT * (801)
966-5553 EXT. 8485 * WATS-IN-STATE  AND  OUT-OF-STATE  1-800-999-3961  EXT. 8485
www. americafirst.com
Rights-Of-Way 

Exclusion Areas

Alternative C

0 2 4 8 12 16 20

Miles

Map 74

T

10N

Harlowton

Roundup

T5N

 ̈¦§

Pompeys

 Pillar

Big Timber

Billings

§ ̈¦

T2 Columbus S  ̈¦§

Bridger

T8S

R18E R29E Montana

R103W R93W Wyoming

T

57N

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings 

Field

Office

Ü

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Legend

Map scale 1:900,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Exclusion Areas

Interstate

Highway

^_ Towns

Public Lands Survey System

94

90

90
§ 367.20 Review and reconsideration of Ethics Counselor decisions. ( a ) *Review.* ( 1 ) A suspended and/or excluded contractor may appeal the exclusion decision to the Corporation Ethics Committee.
( 2 ) In order to avail itself of the right to appeal, a suspended and/or excluded contractor must file a written notice of intent to appeal within 5 days of the Ethics Counselor's decision.
( 3 ) The appeal shall be filed in writing within 30 days of the decision.
( 4 ) The Corporation Ethics Committee, at its discretion and after determining that it is in the best interests of the FDIC, may stay the effect of the suspension and/or exclusion pending conclusion of its review of the matter.
( b ) *Reconsideration.* ( 1 ) A suspended and/or excluded contractor may submit a request to the Ethics Counselor to reconsider the suspension and/or exclusion decision, reduce the period of exclusion or terminate the suspension and/or exclusion.
( 2 ) Such requests shall be in writing and supported by documentation that the requested action is justified by: ( i ) Reversal of the conviction or civil judgment upon which the suspension and/or exclusion was based;
( ii ) Newly discovered material evidence;
( iii ) Bona fide change in ownership or management;
( iv ) Elimination of other causes for which the suspension and/or exclusion was imposed; or
( v ) Other reasons the FDIC Ethics Counselor deems appropriate.
( 3 ) A request for reconsideration based on the reversal of the conviction or civil judgment may be filed at any time.
( 4 ) Requests for reconsideration based on other grounds may only be filed during the period commencing 60 days after the Ethics Counselor's decision imposing the suspension and/or exclusion. Only one such request may be filed in any twelve month period.
( 5 ) The Ethics Counselor's decision on a request for reconsideration is subject to the review procedure set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.
# Official Journal C 27/3 Fe

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 27 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 483 February 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 27

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 483 February 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 027/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 027/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3712 — LGB/Klöckner) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 027/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3670 — Zeiss/EQT/Sola JV) (1) | 3 |
| 2005/C 027/4 | Administrative Commission on social security for migrant workers | 4 |
| 2005/C 027/5 | Amendment by France of a public service obligation in respect of scheduled air services within France (1) | 6 |
| 2005/C 027/6 | Communication from the Commission pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Revision by Sweden of public service obligation in respect of scheduled air services on certain domestic air routes (1) | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 027/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 027/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3712 — LGB/Klöckner) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

2005/C 027/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3670 — Zeiss/EQT/Sola JV) (1)

3

2005/C 027/4

Administrative Commission on social security for migrant workers

4

2005/C 027/5

Amendment by France of a public service obligation in respect of scheduled air services within France (1)

6

2005/C 027/6

Communication from the Commission pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Revision by Sweden of public service obligation in respect of scheduled air services on certain domestic air routes (1)

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal L 18/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2014.018.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 18 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5721 January 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2014.018.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 18

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5721 January 2014

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 37/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2014 amending certain regulations relating to the common commercial policy as regards the procedures for the adoption of certain measures | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 38/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2014 amending certain regulations relating to the common commercial policy as regards the granting of delegated and implementing powers for the adoption of certain measures | 52 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 37/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2014 amending certain regulations relating to the common commercial policy as regards the procedures for the adoption of certain measures

1

*

Regulation (EU) No 38/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2014 amending certain regulations relating to the common commercial policy as regards the granting of delegated and implementing powers for the adoption of certain measures

52

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Procès-verbal of rectification to the Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, signed at Lugano on 30 October 2007(OJ L 147, 10.6.2009) | 70 |

Corrigenda

*

Procès-verbal of rectification to the Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, signed at Lugano on 30 October 2007(OJ L 147, 10.6.2009)

Procès-verbal

(OJ L 147, 10.6.2009)

70

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 20 1 5 - 204 7 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 20 1 5 - CE - 0 1 3 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Yellow River Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Ira Sutton, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>MVAIC, Respondent. </font></b></div><br><br><p>Law Offices of Melissa Betancourt, P.C. (Melissa Betancourt of counsel), for appellant.Marshall &amp; Marshall, PLLC (Tracy Bader Pollak of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Odessa Kennedy, J.), entered March 19, 2018. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted a motion by defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>For the reasons stated in<i> Yellow River Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Ira Sutton v MVAIC </i>(___ Misc 3d ___, 2019 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2018-1076 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: October 18, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### § 121.447 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 356 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 356

   To nullify the effect of certain provisions of various Executive 
                                orders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2003

 Mr. Everett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To nullify the effect of certain provisions of various Executive 
                                orders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Terrorist Elimination Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

     Congress finds that--
            (1) past Presidents have issued Executive orders which 
        severely limit the use of the military when dealing with 
        potential threats against the United States;
            (2) these Executive orders limit the swift, sure, and 
        precise action needed by the United States to protect our 
        national security;
            (3) present strategy allows United States military forces 
        to bomb large targets hoping to eliminate a terrorist leader, 
        but prevents the United States from designing a limited action 
        which would specifically accomplish that purpose;
            (4) on several occasions the United States military forces 
        have been ordered to use a military strike hoping, in most 
        cases unsuccessfully, to remove a terrorist leader who has 
        committed crimes against the United States;
            (5) as the threat from terrorism grows, the United States 
        must continue to investigate effective ways to combat the 
        menace posed by those who would murder United States citizens 
        simply to make a political point; and
            (6) actions by the United States Government to remove such 
        persons is a remedy which should be used sparingly and 
        considered only after all other reasonable options have failed 
        or are not available; however, this is an option the United 
        States must maintain for cases in which international threats 
        cannot be eliminated by other means.

SEC. 3. NULLIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF VARIOUS 
              EXECUTIVE ORDERS.

     Section 2.11 of Executive Order 12333, and any comparable 
provision contained in any other Executive order, regulation, or other 
order of a department or agency of the executive branch, whether issued 
before or after the enactment of this Act, shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```