alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 11
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

§ 11.101 May I ask FAA to reconsider my petition for rulemaking or petition for exemption if it is denied? Yes, you may petition FAA to reconsider your petition denial. You must submit your request to the address to which you sent your original petition, and FAA must receive it within 60 days after we issued the denial. For us to accept your petition, show the following: ( a ) That you have a significant additional fact and why you did not present it in your original petition;
( b ) That we made an important factual error in our denial of your original petition; or
( c ) That we did not correctly interpret a law, regulation, or precedent.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3758 

To amend the Klamath Basin Water Supply Enhancement Act of 2000 

to make certain technical corrections. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2020 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Klamath Basin Water Supply Enhancement 

Act of 2000 to make certain technical corrections. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. KLAMATH BASIN WATER SUPPLY ENHANCE4 MENT ACT OF 2000 TECHNICAL CORREC5 TIONS. 

6 Section 4(b) of the Klamath Basin Water Supply En7 hancement Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2222; 132 Stat. 3887) 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3758 IS

1 (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph 

2 (A)— 

3 (i) by striking ‘‘Pursuant to the rec4 lamation laws and subject’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘Subject’’; and 

6 (ii) by striking ‘‘may’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘is authorized to’’; and 

8 (B) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘, 

9 including conservation and efficiency measures, 

10 land idling, and use of groundwater,’’ after ‘‘ad11 minister programs’’; 

12 (2) in paragraph (3)(A), by inserting ‘‘and’’ 

13 after the semicolon at the end; 

14 (3) by redesignating the second paragraph (4) 

15 (relating to the effect of the subsection) as para16 graph (5); and 

17 (4) in paragraph (5) (as so redesignated)— 

18 (A) by striking subparagraph (B); 

19 (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘; 

20 or’’ and inserting a period; and 

21 (C) by striking ‘‘the Secretary—’’ and all 

22 that follows through ‘‘to develop’’ in subpara23 graph (A) and inserting ‘‘the Secretary to de24 velop’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3348

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 6, 2003

Received 

AN ACT

To reauthorize the ban on undetectable firearms.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3348 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE BAN ON 

2 UNDETECTABLE FIREARMS. 

3 Section 2(f)(2) of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 

4 1988 (18 U.S.C. 922 note) is amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘15’’ and inserting ‘‘25’’; 

6 (2) in subparagraph (B)—

7 (A) by striking ‘‘and (h)’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘through (o)’’; and 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘and (g)’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘through (n)’’; and 

11 (3) by striking subparagraphs (D) and (E) and 

12 inserting the following: 

13 ‘‘(D) section 924(a)(1) of such title is 

14 amended by striking ‘this subsection, subsection 

15 (b), (c), or (f) of this section, or in section 929’ 

16 and inserting ‘this chapter’; and 

17 ‘‘(E) section 925(a) of such title is amend18 ed—

19 ‘‘(i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘and 

20 provisions relating to firearms subject to 

21 the prohibitions of section 922(p)’; and 

22 ‘‘(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘, 

23 except for provisions relating to firearms 

24 subject to the prohibitions of section 

25 922(p),’; and 
3

HR 3348 RDS 

1 ‘‘(iii) in each of paragraphs (3) and 

2 (4), by striking ‘except for provisions relat3 ing to firearms subject to the prohibitions 

4 of section 922(p),’.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 5, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3677 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3677

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require that each 
  prescription drug sold at retail bear a label that states the full 
                       retail price of the drug.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2003

Ms. Hooley of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require that each 
  prescription drug sold at retail bear a label that states the full 
                       retail price of the drug.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prescription Drug Retail Price 
Disclosure Act''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT; REQUIREMENT OF LABEL 
              STATING FULL RETAIL PRICE OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.

    Section 502 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
352) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(w) If it is a drug subject to section 503(b) and is sold at 
retail without bearing a label that states the full retail price for 
the drug, which price is the retail price that applies in the absence 
of--
            ``(1) any discount;
            ``(2) any payment for the drug under an insurance policy or 
        by an entity that provides health services on a pre-paid basis; 
        and
            ``(3) any payment for the drug under a Federal or State 
        health benefits program or a State compensation program.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                             Accountants' Consent


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
Nos. 333-49354 and 333-53192 on Form S-8 and No. 333-51964 on Form S-3 of
3TEC Energy Corporation of our report dated March 16, 2001, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of 3TEC Energy Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2000, and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on
Form 10-KSB of 3TEC Energy Corporation.


                                  KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 29, 2001
# Official Journal L 301/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 301 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6017 November 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 301

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6017 November 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2100 of 4 September 2017 setting out scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine-disrupting properties pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and Council (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2100 of 4 September 2017 setting out scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine-disrupting properties pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and Council (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### § 1221.100 Scope.

This subpart sets forth the policy governing the use of the NASA Seal, the NASA Insignia, NASA Logotype, NASA Program Identifiers, and the NASA Flags. This subpart also establishes and sets forth the concept and scope of the NASA Graphics Standards Manual and prescribes the policy and guidelines for implementation of the system. The NASA Graphics Standards Manual is accessible at *https://communications.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/NASA_Graphics_Standards_v3-TAGGED-v3.pdf*.

[85 FR 71828, Nov. 12, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         842,029
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,294,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,093,981
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,319,891
<PP&E>                                       2,815,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                 834,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,523,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,100,246
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        125
<COMMON>                                           527
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,458,367
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,523,589
<SALES>                                      3,597,155
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,597,155
<CGS>                                        2,269,950
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,975,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               208,347
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              89,981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (946,673)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (946,673)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (946,673)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        

</TABLE>
#### McDonnell & MURPHY et al. v. LUNDAY et al.

No. 30838.

Dec. 15, 1942.

*132 P. 2d 322.*

Looney, Watts, Fenton & Eberle and H. R. Palmer, all of Oklahoma City, for petitioners.

Chas. E. Bledsoe, of Lawton, for respondent.

DAVISON, J.

This is a proceeding to review an order of the State Industrial Commission awarding Kelley M. Lunday compensation for temporary total disability and permanent partial disability for an accidental injury which occurred on January 6, 1941, resulting in a partial loss of vision in both of his eyes.

At the time of the accidental injury the claimant was employed by McDonnell & Murphy, who were engaged in erecting certain structures on the Fort Sill Military Reservation.

McDonnell & Murphy and their insurance carrier, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, appear herein as petitioners seeking to vacate the award on the theory that the State Industrial Commission was without jurisdiction because the accidental injury was sustained on the Fort Sill Military Reservation.

In presenting the matter for review petitioners assemble their argument under two propositions. They say:

> “Exclusive jurisdiction of the area comprising the United States Military Reservation of Fort Sill is in the United States of America, and the State Industrial Commission has no jurisdiction of accidental injuries occurring in that area.

> “The jurisdiction of the federal government over the area comprising the Fort Sill Military Reservation is exclusive and cannot be delegated under article 1, section 8, clause 17, of the Constitution of the United States.”

Both of these contentions were decided adversely to petitioners’ position in the recent case of Ottinger Bros, and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Arthur W. Clark and State Industrial Commission, No. 30840, 191 Okla. 488, 131 P. 2d 94. Our decision in that case governs the disposition of this cause, and the syllabus therein is adopted as the syllabus of this case.

The order and ¿ward of the Industrial Commission is approved.

WELCH, C. J., CORN, V. C. J., and OSBORN, GIBSON, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY and BAY-LESS, JJ., absent.
EXHIBIT 99.3


                                            BANA 1998 Transactions Certification

                    BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                       MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES,
                      SERIES SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT I HERETO

                 OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.17
                  OF THE AGREEMENTS LISTED ON EXHIBIT I HERETO
                  --------------------------------------------

            I, Gary K. Bettin, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A.,
as successor to Bank of America, FSB (the "Master Servicer"), hereby certify
pursuant to Section 3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreements listed on
Exhibit I hereto (collectively, the "Agreements") that: (a) a review of the
activities of the Master Servicer during calendar years 1998, 1999, 2000 and
2001 and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreements has been
made under my supervision, (b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all its material obligations in all
material respects under the Agreements throughout calendar years 1998, 1999,
2000 and 2001 and (c) to the best of my knowledge, each related servicer has
fulfilled its material obligations under its servicing agreement with the Master
Servicer in all material respects.

Dated: November 15, 2002


                                        BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
                                           as Master Servicer


                                        By:/s/ Gary K. Bettin
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Gary K. Bettin
                                           Title:    Senior Vice President

<PAGE>

                                                                       EXHIBIT I

         PARTIES TO AGREEMENT              DATE OF AGREEMENT        SERIES
================================================================================

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    April 1, 1998               1998-1
Inc., Bank of America, FSB and
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
of California

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    May 1, 1998                 1998-2
Inc., Bank of America, FSB and
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
of California

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    June 1, 1998                1998-3
Inc., Bank of America, FSB and The
Bank of New York

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    July 1, 1998                1998-4
Inc., Bank of America, FSB and The
Bank of New York

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    September 1, 1998           1998-5
Inc., Bank of America, FSB and The
Bank of New York

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    November 1, 1998            1998-6
Inc., Bank of America, FSB and The
Bank of New York

Bank of America Mortgage Securities,    December 1, 1998            1998-7
Inc., Bank of America, FSB,
NationsBanc Mortgage Corporation and
The Bank of New York
#### C. H. Tedder, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. George Riggin, *Defendant in Error.*

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

A petition for rehearing has been filed herein upon the theory that the court- overlooked the contention of counsel as to the proper measure of damages applicable to this case.

The opinion clearly shows that this action is brought by a real estate agent one who assumed without authority to act. as agent for the owner of land, to recover the commissions the real estate agent expected to make under a contract made with the assumed. agent by procuring a purchaser of land. The assumed agent was not personal*160ly bound on the contract; and the action was grounded on a breach of warranty of authority to make the contract which was made with an agent to sell for a commission, and not with an intended purchaser of the land. Under these circumstances authorities as to the measure of damages where an intended purchaser is the plaintiff or when the defendant is personally liable on the unauthorized contract are not relevant.

Rehearing denied.

Shackleford, C. J., and Taylor, Cockrell, Hocker and Whitfield, J. J., concur.
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4420 — Crédit Agricole/Fiat Auto/FAFS)

(2006/C 271/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
# Official Journal L 290/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 290 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 574 October 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 290

English edition

Legislation

Volume 574 October 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1044/2014 of 3 October 2014 establishing budgetary ceilings for 2014 applicable to certain direct support schemes provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1045/2014 of 3 October 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 9 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1044/2014 of 3 October 2014 establishing budgetary ceilings for 2014 applicable to certain direct support schemes provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1045/2014 of 3 October 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

9

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ RAKHMATULLA ASATOV , Petitioner,

v. AGENCY FOR INTERNATI ONAL DEVELOPMENT , Respondent.

__________________________ 2013

- 3160

__________________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. PH1221130310 -W-1.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ O R D E R Rakhmatulla Asatov moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Upon consideration th ereof , I T I S O RDERED T HAT : The motion is granted. Case: 13-3160 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 08/09/2013ASATOV V

. AID 2

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

s 21 Case: 13-3160 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 08/09/2013
| (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Metals Corporation for the year ended April 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of General Metals Corporation. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 12, 2010 |   |                                            |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |                                            |
|                   |   |                                            |
|                   |   | /s/ Robert Carrington                           |   |   |
|                   |   | Robert Carrington                               |
|                   |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|                   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                   |
|                   |   | General Metals Corporation                      |
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3615 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3615

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to reimburse members of the Armed 
Forces for the cost of protective body armor purchased by or on behalf 
                             of the member.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2003

  Mr. Larson of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Defense to reimburse members of the Armed 
Forces for the cost of protective body armor purchased by or on behalf 
                             of the member.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES FOR PURCHASE OF 
              PROTECTIVE BODY ARMOR.

    (a) Reimbursement Authorized.--The Secretary of Defense may 
reimburse a member of the Armed Forces for the cost of protective body 
armor purchased by the member, or by another person on behalf of the 
member, for use by the member while deployed in connection with 
Operation Noble Eagle, Operation Enduring Freedom, or Operation Iraqi 
Freedom if the member was so deployed and was not issued protective 
body armor before such deployment.
    (b) Duration of Authority.--Reimbursement may be provided under 
subsection (a) for protective body armor purchased during the period 
beginning on September 11, 2001, and ending on December 31, 2003. Not 
later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall implement regulations to expedite the provision of such 
reimbursement.
                                 <all>
```