alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 **Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, H. Lynn Harton, Chief Executive Officer of The South Financial Group, Inc. (“TSFG”) certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 of TSFG (the “Report”): 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TSFG. 

 

 

| /s/ H. Lynn Harton  |
|--------------------------|

H. Lynn Harton

Chief Executive Officer

The South Financial Group, Inc.

November 9, 2009

 

  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The South Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by The South Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to        the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal C 34/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2014.034.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 34 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 575 February 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2014.034.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 34

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 575 February 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2014/C 034/01 | Decision | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2014/C 034/01

Decision

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

V Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

| 5.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/1

---

DECISION

2014/C 34/01

THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1), as amended by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 (2) and most recently by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1080/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of those Communities (3), in particular Article 30 of those Staff Regulations,

Having regard to the Bureau decision of 3 May 2004 on delegation of the powers of the appointing authority and of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment (AECE), as last amended by the Bureau on 4 May 2009,

Having regard to the expiry date of 31 December 2013 set for the following European Parliament reserve lists:

PE/99/S, PE/109/S, AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/5/08, PE/119/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S and PE/121/S,

Whereas the Joint Committee has been asked to deliver an opinion within 15 working days, in accordance with Article 10a of the Staff Regulations,

HAS DECIDED:

Article 1

The period of validity of the following reserve lists:

AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S and PE/121/S

shall be extended until 31 December 2014.

Article 2

The period of validity of the following reserve lists:

PE/99/S, PE/109/S, AST/5/08 and PE/119/S,

shall not be extended.

Done at Luxembourg, 20 December 2013.

Klaus WELLE

Secretary-General

---

(1)  OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 124, 27.4.2004, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 311, 26.11.2010, p. 1.

3

---
§ 625.10 Contents of application. ( a ) An application for an award of fees and other expenses under the EAJA shall identify the applicant and the adversary adjudication for which an award is sought. The application shall show that the applicant has prevailed in the adversary adjudication. If the application is made on the basis of significant and discrete substantive issues on which the applicant prevailed, the issues must be specifically identified. The application also shall identify each position of the FCA or other agencies that the applicant alleges was not substantially justified. Unless the applicant is an individual, the application shall describe briefly the type and purpose of its organization or business and state the number of persons employed.
( b ) The application shall include a statement that the applicant's net worth does not exceed $2 million (if an individual) or $7 million (for all other applicants, including their affiliates). However, an applicant may omit this statement if: ( 1 ) It states that it has 500 employees or fewer and attaches a copy of a ruling by the Internal Revenue Service that it qualifies as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) or, in the case of a tax-exempt organization not required to obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service on its exempt status, a statement that describes the basis for the applicant's belief that it qualifies under such section; or
( 2 ) It states that it is a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)) with 500 or fewer employees.
( c ) The application shall state the total amount of fees and other expenses for which an award is sought.
( d ) The application may include any other relevant matters that the applicant wishes the FCA to consider in determining whether and in what amount an award should be made.
( e ) The application shall be signed by the applicant or an authorized officer or attorney of the applicant. The application must contain a written verification under oath or under penalty of perjury that the information provided in the application and any supporting documents is accurate.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 **Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, Mack I. Whittle, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of The South Financial Group, Inc. (“TSFG”) certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 of TSFG (the “Report”): 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TSFG. 

 

 

  */s/  Mack I. Whittle, Jr.*       

Mack I. Whittle, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

The South Financial Group, Inc.

November 8, 2006

 

  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The South Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by The South Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 120.115 Employee Assistance Program (EAP). ( a ) The employer shall provide an EAP for employees. The employer may establish the EAP as a part of its internal personnel services or the employer may contract with an entity that will provide EAP services to an employee. Each EAP must include education and training on drug use for employees and training for supervisors making determinations for testing of employees based on reasonable cause.
( b ) *EAP education program.* ( 1 ) Each EAP education program must include at least the following elements: ( i ) Display and distribution of informational material;
( ii ) Display and distribution of a community service hot-line telephone number for employee assistance; and
( iii ) Display and distribution of the employer's policy regarding drug use in the workplace.
( 2 ) The employer's policy shall include information regarding the consequences under the rule of using drugs while performing safety-sensitive functions, receiving a verified positive drug test result, or refusing to submit to a drug test required under the rule.
( c ) *EAP training program.* ( 1 ) Each employer shall implement a reasonable program of initial training for employees. The employee training program must include at least the following elements: ( i ) The effects and consequences of drug use on individual health, safety, and work environment;
( ii ) The manifestations and behavioral cues that may indicate drug use and abuse; and
( 2 ) The employer's supervisory personnel who will determine when an employee is subject to testing based on reasonable cause shall receive specific training on specific, contemporaneous physical, behavioral, and performance indicators of probable drug use in addition to the training specified in § 120.115 (c).
( 3 ) The employer shall ensure that supervisors who will make reasonable cause determinations receive at least 60 minutes of initial training.
( 4 ) The employer shall implement a reasonable recurrent training program for supervisory personnel making reasonable cause determinations during subsequent years.
( 5 ) Documentation of all training given to employees and supervisory personnel must be included in the training program.
( 6 ) The employer shall identify the employee and supervisor EAP training in the employer's drug testing program.
[Doc. No. FAA-2008-0937, 74 FR 22653, May 14, 2009, as amended by Amdt. 120-1, 78 FR 42003, July 15, 2013]
# L_2008283EN.01S00301.xml

| 28.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 283/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 283/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
Exhibit 32

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED
AFFILIATES

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Electric
Capital Services, Inc. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "report"), we, Dennis D. Dammerman and James A. Parke, Chairman
of the Board and Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the
registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

(1)
    The report fully complies with the requirements of section
    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in
    all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
    the registrant.






October 31, 2003



/s/ Dennis D. DammermanDennis D. Dammerman
    Chairman of the Board/s/ James A. ParkeJames A. Parke
    Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTERST OF J. A., JR.,

 

 Appellant.

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-13-00253-CV

Appeal from the

233rd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC# 233-484891-10)

ORDER

On August 30, 2013 this Court issued an order for mediation referral. The Court required 

the parties to agree upon a mediator and advise this Court in writing within twenty days from the 

date of the Order for Mediation Referral. On September 29, 2013, Mr. Richerson advised the 

clerk’s office that he would either file a motion for extension of time for mediation or a motion 

to re-establish the appellate timetable, as of this date, nothing has been filed.

Therefore, the Court ORDERS this appeal to continue, the appellate timetable suspension 

is lifted and the Clerk’s Record shall now be filed in this Court on or before November 10, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 11

th day of October, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 372 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 372

  To appropriately limit the impact of the presence of large Federal 
   installations in the delineation of core based statistical areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2019

 Mr. Risch (for himself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To appropriately limit the impact of the presence of large Federal 
   installations in the delineation of core based statistical areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Statistical Area Fairness Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. LIMITS IN DELINEATION OF CORE BASED STATISTICAL AREAS.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``large Federal 
installation'' means a parcel of Federal land--
            (1) that has an area of not less than 500 miles; and
            (2) on which a Federal facility (as defined in section 930 
        of title 18, United States Code) is situated.
    (b) Purposes.--The purposes of this section are--
            (1) to account for the impact that large Federal 
        installations have on rural counties in which they are based; 
        and
            (2) to ensure that rural counties with large Federal 
        installations within their borders are not negatively affected 
        by core based statistical area designations.
    (c) Limitation.--In delineating core based statistical areas, the 
Office of Management and Budget shall not include a county in which a 
large Federal installation is located in a core based statistical area 
on the basis of the percentage of the employment in that county that is 
accounted for by workers who reside in the central county or counties 
of the core based statistical area, as determined by the Office of 
Management and Budget.
                                 <all>
```
#### MASON, ET AL. v. THE STATE.

(Decided November 25, 1913.)

Appeal from Elmore Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. •

Pelham, J.

No error.

Affirmed.
§ 1240.103 Criteria. ( a ) Only those contributions to NASA which have been: ( 1 ) Used in a NASA program or adopted or sponsored or supported by NASA, and
( 2 ) Found to have significant value in the conduct of aeronautical and space activities, will be recommended for award under this subpart.
( b ) In determining the amount, terms, and conditions of any award, the following criteria will be considered: ( 1 ) The value of the contribution to the United States;
( 2 ) The aggregate amount of any sums which have been expended by the applicant for the development of such contribution;
( 3 ) The amount of any compensation (other than salary received for services rendered as an officer or employee of the Government) previously received by the applicant for or on account of the use of such contributions by the United States; and
( 4 ) Such other factors as the Administrator shall determine to be material.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Ralph C. Guild, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) (Intentionally omitted)



c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2004 |  | /s/ Ralph C. Guild                               
|                      |  | Ralph C. Guild                                   
|                      |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT May 23, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

N o. 07- 1505 8
D. C. Docket N o. 04-00321 CV -CG -B ARGO SYSTEMS FZE, Pl ai nti ff -Appe llant,
ve rs us LIBERTY INSURANCE PTE. LTD, MARINE INSUR ANCE SERVICES PTE. LTD, DEW ITT STERN GROUP, INC., DEW ITT STERN, IMPERATORE, LTD., D ef en da nts -Appe lle es .

Appeal f rom the United State s District Court f o r t h e S o u t h e rn D i s t r i c t o f

A l ab a ma (M ay 2 3, 200 8)2

Before DU BIN A and BARK ET T, Circuit Judges, and SCH LE SIN GE R,* D istrict Judg e. PE R CU RIA M: Appellant Ar go Sy stem s FZ E ( “ Ar go”) appeals the district court’ s order granting Appellees Liberty Insurance P te. Ltd. (“ Liberty ”) a nd Marine Insurance Se rv ic es P T E
. L td. ’ s ( “ MI S” ) m oti on t o di sm iss f or la ck of pe rs ona l j ur isd ic tio n
an d th e dis tr ic t c ourt’ s j udgm en t e nte re d inf av or of A ppe lle e D eW itt

S te rn , Im pe ra tor e, L td. ( “ D eW itt ” or “ D SI ”) on A rg o’ s pr of

es sio na l ne gli ge nc e an d

ne gl ig en t m is rep res en ta ti on cla im s. A ft er r ev ie w ing the r ec or d, r ea din g th e pa rt ie s’ br ie fs , a nd h av ing the be ne fi t of or al a rg um en t, w e co nc lud e tha t t he re is no m er it to any of the

ar g u m en t s Ar g o m ak es i n t h i s ap p ea l . Ac co rd i n g l y, we a ff i rm th e d i s t ri ct co u rt ’s order granting Liberty

and MIS’ s m otion to dism iss for lack of personal j ur isd ic tio n. Mo re ove r, w e af fi rm the dis tr ic t c ourt’ s j udgm en t e nte re d inf av or of D eW itt a ft er abe nc h tr ia l on

A rg o’ s pr of

es sio na l ne gli ge nc e an d ne gli ge nt

m is rep res en ta ti on cla im s. AFFIRMED.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ *Honora ble Har vey E. Schlesing er, U nited States District Court for the Middle District of Florida , sitti ng by

desig nation.
"WBID"	"exclude"
"1083"	0
"10C"	0
"10D"	0
"10F"	0
"1121"	0
"1149A"	0
"1240"	0
"1300"	0
"1303"	0
"1329C"	0
"1329D"	0
"1329E"	0
"1329F"	0
"1351A"	0
"149"	0
"160B"	0
"161"	0
"1807C"	0
"18A"	0
"1978"	0
"2097K"	0
"2105"	0
"2120B"	0
"2161"	0
"2196"	0
"2211"	0
"2264"	0
"24"	0
"2407"	0
"2415E"	0
"2444"	0
"2478"	0
"2493"	0
"2498"	0
"24C"	0
"2500"	0
"2551A"	0
"2713"	0
"2740A"	0
"279"	0
"28935"	0
"28936"	0
"2905"	0
"2929A"	0
"30"	0
"3035"	0
"3042"	0
"3086"	0
"30B"	0
"3164"	0
"3235E"	0
"3235G"	0
"3236A"	0
"3310Z"	0
"3324"	0
"3341A"	0
"3351"	0
"3388"	0
"3424"	0
"3448"	0
"3480"	0
"3506B"	0
"3573A"	0
"3605"	0
"3605D"	0
"375E"	1
"375G"	0
"397"	0
"495A"	0
"504"	0
"553"	0
"569"	0
"642"	0
"679"	0
"684"	0
"718"	0
"749"	0
"793Z"	0
"815"	0
"889"	0
"969"	0
"998"	0
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 11, 2013

No. 04

- 13

- 00793

- CV

BHOTAN VALLEY INVESTORS LLC

, Appellant

v.

LEM 2Q LLC and LEM 2P LLC

, Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 05732

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, appellant’s petition for permission to appeal is DENIED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.

I t is so ORDERED on December 11, 2013

.

_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of December, 2013

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk