alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the annual  report of Lexington  Resources,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Grant
R. Atkins,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  and Vaughn Barbon,  Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company,  each  certifies for the purpose of complying
with Rule  13a-14(b) or Rule  15d-14(b) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
(the  "Exchange  Act") and Section  1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Exchange Act; and

2.   the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: March 31, 2006                  By:  /s/ Grant R. Atkins
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Grant R. Atkins, Chief Executive
                                       Officer


Dated: March 31, 2006                  By:  /s/ Vaughn Barbon
                                      -------------------------------
                                      Vaughn Barbon, Chief Financial
                                      Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, William J. McEntee, Jr., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) (Intentionally omitted)



c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    WILLIAM J. MCENTEE,
JR.                   
|                        |  |  |  | William J. McEntee, Jr.                          
|                        |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
6/3/2015 

FRIEDRICH A. KATTERMANN 

135 Schaeffer Drive 

Ronkonkoma, NY 11779 

Email: Fredkattermann@gmail.com Cell: 631-987-4747 

US Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Via Certified Receipt Mail 

RE: Request for Exemption 

Dear Folks, 

- ,j . '-.-' 

I am a "person" and hereby request an exemption to 14CFR, Federal Aviation Regulation 91.881, Civil subsonic jet airplanes 

weighing 75,000 pounds or less. This regulation is in regard to stage 3 noise compliance. Effective date December 31,2015. 

I am type rated in a Morane Saulnier MS-760 airplane. I fly several of these aircraft. I hold a Commercial pilot certificate# 3331122. 

In the docket for rule making for this regulatory change, this make and model was excluded from the FAA analysis. The docket 

number is FAA-2013-0503; Arndt. No. 91.328. 

This make and model airplane has a gross weight of 8, 750 pounds and thereby is a small aircraft, under 12,500 pounds. This aircraft is 

a twin engine jet powered airplane. This airplane was certified in the United States July 1958. Type Certificate number 7 A3. 

This airplane is clearly listed in FAA Advisory Circular 36-3H. change 1, dated 5/25/2012, Estimated Airplane Noise Levels in AWeighed Decibels. The data provided in this AC was provided by DGAC (French Aviation Authority) as noted in the AC. The noise 

levels are within the stage 3 noise compliance requirements. The operation of these aircraft will not be in any conflict with stage 3 

noise regulations. 

The FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual does not contain data regarding Stage 3 compliance. The present flight manual is dated 

April1963. This exemption has no effect on safety. 

This airplane is the first Very Light Jet (VLJ) and has historical roots. These airplanes operate for personal transportation of their 

respective owners and also are frequently taken to "Airshows" for display to the general public. 

This new regulation takes effect December 31, 2015. Exemption to this regulation is needed before this date to allow for recurrent 

training and normal operations of these airplanes in the National Airspace System. 

Summary: An Exemption is hereby granted to Friedrich A. Kattermann, holder of commercial pilot certificate 3331122 to operate 

Morane Saulnier MS-760 series aircraft to and from any suitable airports in the contiguous United States. 

Thank you for your assistance in this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Fre Kattenna:-y
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24433-2 Filed:06/02/23 Entered:06/06/23 17:06

Envelope Page 1 of 1
#### S. ANARGYROS v. UNITED STATES

[75 C.Cls. 874; 290 U.S. 670]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by Supreme Court October 16, 1933.
§ 121.581 Observer's seat: En route inspections. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, each certificate holder shall make available a seat on the flight deck of each airplane, used by it in air commerce, for occupancy by the Administrator while conducting en route inspections. The location and equipment of the seat, with respect to its suitability for use in conducting en route inspections, is determined by the Administrator.
( b ) In each airplane that has more than one observer's seat, in addition to the seats required for the crew complement for which the airplane was certificated, the forward observer's seat or the observer's seat selected by the Administrator must be made available when complying with paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) For any airplane type certificated before December 20, 1995, for not more than 30 passengers that does not have an observer seat on the flightdeck, the certificate holder must provide a forward passenger seat with headset or speaker for occupancy by the Administrator while conducting en route inspections.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19219, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-144, 43 FR 22648, May 25, 1978; Amdt. 121-251, 60 FR 65935, Dec. 20, 1995; Amdt. 121-288, 67 FR 2128, Jan. 15, 2002]
§ 101.21 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart applies to operating unmanned rockets. However, a person operating an unmanned rocket within a restricted area must comply with § 101.25(g)(2)) and with any additional limitations imposed by the using or controlling agency.
( b ) A person operating an unmanned rocket other than an amateur rocket as defined in § 1.1 of this chapter must comply with 14 CFR Chapter III.
[Doc. No. FAA-2007-27390, 73 FR 73781, Dec. 4, 2008, as amended by Docket No. FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. No. 101-11, 87 FR 75846, Dec. 9, 2022]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Answersto questions about the National Flood Insurance Program [electronic resource].**
 
2004|2006|2010|2011|
 
SuDoc Number:FEM 1.2:F 65/2/
Item Number:0520-E-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000964142
 
July 12, 2018
§ 13.2 Reports of violations. ( a ) Any person who knows of any violation of 49 U.S.C. subtitle VII, 49 U.S.C. chapter 51, or any rule, regulation, or order issued under those statutes, should report the violation to FAA personnel.
( b ) FAA personnel will review each report made under this section to determine whether any additional investigation or action is warranted.
§ 13.217 Joint procedural or discovery schedule. ( a ) *General.* The parties may agree to submit a schedule for filing all prehearing motions, conducting discovery in the proceedings, or both.
( b ) *Form and content of schedule.* If the parties agree to a joint procedural or discovery schedule, one of the parties must file the joint schedule setting forth the dates to which the parties have agreed, in accordance with § 13.210, and must also serve a copy of the joint schedule in accordance with § 13.211. The filing of the joint schedule must include a draft order establishing a joint schedule to be signed by the administrative law judge. ( 1 ) The joint schedule may include, but need not be limited to, requests for discovery, objections to discovery requests, responses to discovery requests to which there are no objections, submission of prehearing motions, responses to prehearing motions, exchange of exhibits to be introduced at the hearing, and a list of witnesses that may be called at the hearing.
( 2 ) Each party must sign the joint schedule.
( c ) *Time.* The parties may agree to submit all prehearing motions and responses and may agree to close discovery in the proceedings under the joint schedule within a reasonable time before the date of the hearing, but not later than 15 days before the hearing.
( d ) *Joint scheduling order.* The joint schedule filed by the parties is a proposed schedule that requires approval of the administrative law judge to become the joint scheduling order.
( e ) *Disputes.* The administrative law judge must resolve disputes regarding discovery or disputes regarding compliance with the joint scheduling order as soon as possible so that the parties may continue to comply with the joint scheduling order.
( f ) *Sanctions for failure to comply with joint schedule.* If a party fails to comply with a joint scheduling order, the administrative law judge may impose any of the following sanctions, proportional to the party's failure to comply with the order: ( 1 ) Strike the relevant portion of a party's pleadings;
( 2 ) Preclude prehearing or discovery motions by that party;
( 3 ) Preclude admission of the relevant portion of a party's evidence at the hearing; or
( 4 ) Preclude the relevant portion of the testimony of that party's witnesses at the hearing.
#### § 1203.304 Internal effect.

The effect of security protection on program progess and cost and on other functional activities of NASA should be considered. Impeditive effects and added costs inherent in a security classification must be assessed and weighed against the detrimental effects on the national security interests which would result from failure to classify.

[44 FR 34913, June 18, 1979, as amended at 78 FR 5118, Jan. 24, 2013]
**RECITALS**

**STANLEY        FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.        [SEAL]**

|  By:         |  /s/ Douglas I.                Payne         |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:  |  Douglas I. Payne                                                                    |
|  Title:      |  Vice President -  Finance and                Administration                    |

**WACHOVIA        BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION       [SEAL]**

|  By:      |  /s/ Jonathan R. Richardson |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|  Name:                             |  Jonathan R. Richardson     |
|  Title:                            |  Vice President             |
#### § 407.5 Certification by General Counsel.

For every meeting closed pursuant to any paragraph of § 407.2(a), the General Counsel of Eximbank will be asked to certify prior to such meeting that in his or her opinion such meeting may properly be closed to the public, and to state which of the exemptions set forth in § 407.2(a) he or she has relied upon. A copy of such certification will be posted in the Office of the Secretary. The original certification together with a statement from the presiding officer of such meeting setting forth the time, date and place of such meeting and the persons present will be retained by Eximbank as part of the transcript, recording or minutes of such meeting described below.
# L_2007156EN.01S00301.xml

| 16.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 156/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 156/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

In view of the situation which has arisen following enlargement, some editions of the Official Journal of 27, 29 and 30 December 2006 have been published, in a simplified manner, in the official languages of that date.

It has been decided to republish, as corrigenda and in the Official Journal’s traditional presentation, Acts which appear in those Official Journals.

It is for this reason that Official Journals which contain only those corrigenda have been published in the pre-enlargement language versions. The translations of Acts in the languages of the new Member States will be published in a special edition of the Official Journal of the European Union comprising texts of the institutions and the European Central Bank adopted prior to 1 January 2007.

Official Journal of the European Union

Given below is a list of the Official Journals published on 27, 29 and 30 December 2006 and their corresponding corrigenda.

| OJ of 27 December 2006 | Corrected OJ (2007) |
| --- | --- |
| L 370 | L 30 |
| L 371 | L 45 |
| L 373 | L 121 |
| L 375 | L 70 |

OJ of 27 December 2006

Corrected OJ (2007)

L 370

L 30

L 371

L 45

L 373

L 121

L 375

L 70

| OJ of 29 December 2006 | Corrected OJ (2007) |
| --- | --- |
| L 387 | L 34 |

OJ of 29 December 2006

Corrected OJ (2007)

L 387

L 34

| OJ of 30 December 2006 | Corrected OJ (2007) |
| --- | --- |
| L 396 | L 136 |
| L 400 | L 54 |
| L 405 | L 29 |
| L 407 | L 44 |
| L 408 | L 47 |
| L 409 | L 36 |
| L 410 | L 40 |
| L 411 | L 27 |
| L 413 | L 50 |

OJ of 30 December 2006

Corrected OJ (2007)

L 396

L 136

L 400

L 54

L 405

L 29

L 407

L 44

L 408

L 47

L 409

L 36

L 410

L 40

L 411

L 27

L 413

L 50

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HAROLD D. HARDEN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 15755
D.C. No. 2:14

- cv - 02008

- JAD

- VCF

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 15 , 2017 **
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. Nevada state prisoner Harold D. Harden appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional
claims . We have jurisdiction under 28 U. S.C. § 1291. We review de novo

. Williams v. Paramo , 775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015) (summary judgment for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argume nt. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 20 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 15755

failure to exhaust administrative remedies); Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San Diego , 670 F.3d 957, 970 (9th Cir. 2011) (cross

- motions for summary judgment). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare Sys., LP , 534 F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendants on Harden’s retaliation and excessive force claims because Harden failed to ra ise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he properly exhausted his available administrative remedies as required by the Priso n Litigation Reform Act , or whether administrative remedies were effectively unavailable. See Woodford v. Ngo , 548 U.S . 81 , 90 (2006) (“[P]roper exhaustion of administrative remedies . . . means using all steps that the agency holds out, and doing so properly (so that the agency addresses the issues on the merits).” (citation and int ernal quotation marks omitted)); Willia ms , 775 F.3d at 1191 (a prisoner who does not exhaust administrative remedies must show that “there is something particular in his case that made the existing and generally available administrative remedies effectively unavailable to him”); Griffin v. Arpa io , 557 F.3d 1117 , 1120

- 21 (9th Cir. 2009) ( “[A] grievance suffices if it alerts the prison to the nature of the wrong for which redress is sought.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted) )

. Summary judgment for defendants on Harden’s access - to

- courts claim was
proper because Harden failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to3 17

- 15755

whether defendants caused an actual injury. See Lewis v. Casey , 518 U.S. 343,
348

- 49, 354

- 55 (1996) (setting forth elements of an access

- to

- courts c laim and actual injury requirement). We do not consider issues not specifically and distinctly raised in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
AFFIRMED.
§ 1253.140 Dissemination of policy. ( a ) *Notification of policy.* ( 1 ) Each recipient shall implement specific and continuing steps to notify applicants for admission and employment, students and parents of elementary and secondary school students, employees, sources of referral of applicants for admission and employment, and all unions or professional organizations holding collective bargaining or professional agreements with the recipient, that it does not discriminate on the basis of sex in the educational programs or activities that it operates, and that it is required by Title IX and these Title IX regulations not to discriminate in such a manner. Such notification shall contain such information, and be made in such manner, as the designated agency official finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by Title IX and these Title IX regulations, but shall state at least that the requirement not to discriminate in education programs or activities extends to employment therein, and to admission thereto unless §§ 1253.300 through 1253.310 do not apply to the recipient, and that inquiries concerning the application of Title IX and these Title IX regulations to such recipient may be referred to the employee designated pursuant to § 1253.135, or to the designated agency official.
( 2 ) Each recipient shall make the initial notification required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section within 90 days of September 29, 2000 or of the date these Title IX regulations first apply to such recipient, whichever comes later, which notification shall include publication in: ( i ) Newspapers and magazines operated by such recipient or by student, alumnae, or alumni groups for or in connection with such recipient; and
( ii ) Memoranda or other written communications distributed to every student and employee of such recipient.
( b ) *Publications.* ( 1 ) Each recipient shall prominently include a statement of the policy described in paragraph (a) of this section in each announcement, bulletin, catalog, or application form that it makes available to any person of a type, described in paragraph (a) of this section, or which is otherwise used in connection with the recruitment of students or employees.
( 2 ) A recipient shall not use or distribute a publication of the type described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section that suggests, by text or illustration, that such recipient treats applicants, students, or employees differently on the basis of sex except as such treatment is permitted by these Title IX regulations.
( c ) *Distribution.* Each recipient shall distribute without discrimination on the basis of sex each publication described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, and shall apprise each of its admission and employment recruitment representatives of the policy of nondiscrimination described in paragraph (a) of this section, and shall require such representatives to adhere to such policy.
# Official Journal C 216/1 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 216 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 581 July 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 216

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 581 July 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 216/1 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Fourth supplement to the 33rd complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 216/1

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Fourth supplement to the 33rd complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN