24996 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 83 / Friday, April 28, 2000 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

[TA–W–37,518]

Lucky Star Industries, Workers

Employed at Double ‘‘L’’ Learning

Center, Nettleton, MS; Notice of

Termination of Investigation

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade

Act of 1974, an investigation was

initiated on March 27, 2000 in response

to a worker petition which was filed on

behalf of workers at Double ‘‘L’’

Learning Center who were employees of

Lucky Star Industries, Nettleton,

Mississippi.

The petitioning group of workers are

covered under an existing Trade

Adjustment Assistance certification,

TA–W–35,320A, which is valid through

March 23, 2001. Consequently, further

investigation in this case would serve

no purpose, and the investigation has

been terminated.

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 13th day

of April 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Office of Trade

Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00–10583 Filed 4–27–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

[NAFTA—03529]

Cerplex, Corvallis, OR; Dismissal of

Application for Reconsideration

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an

application for administrative

reconsideration was filed with the

Director of the Division of Trade

Adjustment Assistance for workers at

Cerplex, Corvallis, Oregon. The

application contained no new

substantial information which would

bear importantly on the Department’s

determination. Therefore, dismissal of

the application was issued.

NAFTA—03529; Cerplex, Corvallis, Oregon

(April 14, 2000)

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 14th day

of April, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade

Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00–10580 Filed 4–27–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

[NAFTA–3454]

Tektronix, Incorporated, Video and

Networking Division, Beaverton, OR;

Notice of Negative Determination

Regarding Application for

Reconsideration

By application dated December 9,

1999, one of the petitioners requested

administrative reconsideration of the

Department’s negative determination

regarding worker eligibility to apply for

NAFTA–TAA. The denial notice

applicable to workers of the subject firm

located in Beaverton, Oregon, was

signed on November 16, 1999 and

published in the Federal Register on

December 2, 1999 (64 FR 67595).

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)

reconsideration may be granted under

the following circumstances:

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts

not previously considered that the

determination complained of was

erroneous;

(2) If it appears that the determination

complained of was based on a mistake

in the determination of facts not

previously considered; or

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying

Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of

the law justified reconsideration of the

decision.

Findings of the initial investigation

showed that workers of Tektronix,

Incorporated, Video and Networking

Division, Beaverton, Oregon, produced

profile products which are used for the

production of videos and computer

products. The Department’s denial of

NAFTA–TAA for workers of the subject

firm was based on the finding that

criterion (3) and (4) of the worker group

eligibility requirements of paragraph

(a)(1) of section 250 of the Trade Act of

1974, as amended, were not met. There

were no company imports or increased

customer imports from Mexico or

Canada of profile products. Tektronix,

Incorporated, did not shift production of

articles produced in the Video and

Networking Division to Mexico or

Canada. Layoffs were attributable to a

domestic shift in production.

The petitioner claims that the

Lightworks product line was sold to a

company in Montreal, Canada, which

contributed to worker separations at the

Beaverton plant of the subject firm.

In order to respond to the petitioner,

the Department contacted the subject

firm to learn whether Lightworks was

produced in the Video and Networking

Division of the subject firm, and

whether there was a shift in the

production from Beaverton to Canada of

Lightworks.

Information provided by the company

affirms that Lightworks, a non-linear

video editing product, was produced by

workers in the Video and Networking

Division of the subject firm. Further, the

company official confirmed the sale of

Lightworks to a Canadian firm within

the time period relevant to the

investigation. The sale of a product line

by the subject firm to a company in

Canada, however, is not a basis for

worker group certification under

NAFTA–TAA. In this case, only

increased imports from Canada of

articles like or directly competitive with

those produced at the workers’ firm, or

a shift in production from the workers’

firm to Canada would constitute a basis

for NAFTA–TAA certification for the

petitioners.

Conclusion

After review of the application and

investigative findings, I conclude that

there has been no error or

misinterpretation of the law or of the

facts which would justify

reconsideration of the Department of

Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the

application is denied.

Signed at Washington, DC this 14th day of

April 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade

Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00–10581 Filed 4–27–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment Standards

Administration, Wage and Hour

Division

Minimum Wages for Federal and

Federally Assisted Construction;

General Wage Determination Decisions

General wage determination decisions

of the Secretary of Labor are issued in

accordance with applicable law and are

based on the information obtained by

the Department of Labor from its study

of local wage conditions and data made

available from other sources. They

specify the basic hourly wage rates and

fringe benefits which are determined to

be prevailing for the described classes of

laborers and mechanics employed on

construction projects of a similar

character and in the localities specified

therein.

The determinations in these decisions

of prevailing rates and fringe benefits

have been made in accordance with 29

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 83 / Friday, April 28, 2000 / Notices 24997

CFR Part 1, by authority of the Secretary

of Labor pursuant to the provisions of

the Davis-Bacon Act of March 3, 1931,

as amended (46 Stat. 1494, as amended,

40 U.S.C. 276a) and of other Federal

statutes referred to in 29 CFR Part 1,

Appendix, as well as such additional

statutes as may from time to time be

enacted containing provisions for the

payment of wages determined to be

prevailing by the Secretary of Labor in

accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act.

The prevailing rates and fringe benefits

determined in these decisions shall, in

accordance with the provisions of the

foregoing statutes, constitute the

minimum wages payable on Federal and

federally assisted construction projects

to laborers and mechanics of the

specified classes engaged on contract

work of the character and in the

localities described therein.

Good cause is hereby found for not

utilizing notice and public comment

procedure thereon prior to the issuance

of these determinations as prescribed in

5 U.S.C. 553 and not providing for delay

in the effective date as prescribed in that

section, because the necessity to issue

current construction industry wage

determinations frequently and in large

volume causes procedures to be

impractical and contrary to the public

interest.

General wage determination

decisions, and modifications and

supersedes decisions thereto, contain no

expiration dates and are effective from

their date of notice in the Federal

Register, or on the date written notice

is received by the agency, whichever is

earlier. These decisions are to be used

in accordance with the provisions of 29

CFR Parts 1 and 5. Accordingly, the

applicable decision, together with any

modifications issues, must be made a

part of every contract for performance of

the described work within the

geographic area indicated as required by

an applicable Federal prevailing wage

law and 29 CFR Part 5. The wage rates

and fringe benefits, notice of which is

published herein, and which are

contained in the Government Printing

Office (GPO) document entitled

‘‘General Wage Determinations Issued

Under the Davis-Bacon And Related

Acts,’’ shall be the minimum paid by

contractors and subcontractors to

laborers and mechanics.

Any person, organization, or

governmental agency having an interest

in the rates determined as prevailing is

encouraged to submit wage rate and

fringe benefit information for

consideration by the Department.

Further information and selfexplanatory forms for the purpose of

submitting this data may be obtained by

writing to the U.S. Department of Labor,

Employment Standards Administration,

Wage and Hour Division, Division of

Wage Determinations, 200 Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Room S–3014,

Washington, D.C. 20210.

New General Wage Determination

Decision

The number of the decisions added to

the Government Printing Office

document entitled ‘‘General Wage

Determinations Issued Under the DavisBacon and Related Acts’’ are listed by

Volume and States:

Volume I

New Jersey

NJ000009 (Apr. 28, 2000)

Modifications to General Wage

Determination Decisions

The number of decisions listed in the

Government Printing Office document

entitled ‘‘General Wage Determinations

Issued Under the Davis-Bacon and

Related Acts’’ being modified are listed

by Volume and State. Dates of

publication in the Federal Register are

in parentheses following the decisions

being modified.

Volume I

None

Volume II

None

Volume III

Georgia

GA000022 (Feb. 11, 2000)

GA000033 (Feb. 11, 2000)

GA000065 (Feb. 11, 2000)

GA000085 (Feb. 11, 2000)

GA000086 (Feb. 11, 2000)

GA000087 (Feb. 11, 2000)

GA000088 (Feb. 11, 2000)

GA000089 (Feb. 11, 2000)

GA000093 (Feb. 11, 2000)

GA000094 (Feb. 11, 2000)

Volume IV

Illinois

IL000018 (Feb. 11, 2000)

Michigan

MI000001 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000002 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000003 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000005 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000007 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000012 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000030 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000031 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000046 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000049 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000060 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000062 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000063 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000066 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000067 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000068 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000069 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000070 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000071 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000072 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000073 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000074 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000075 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000076 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000078 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000079 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000080 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000081 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000082 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000084 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000085 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000088 (Feb. 11, 2000)

Volume V

None

Volume VI

Oregon

OR000001 (Feb. 11, 2000)

OR000017 (Feb. 11, 2000)

Washington

WA000001 (Feb. 11, 2000)

WA000005 (Feb. 11, 2000)

WA000008 (Feb. 11, 2000)

Volume VII

California

CA000009 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000028 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000029 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000033 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000035 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000036 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000037 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000038 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000039 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000040 (Feb. 11, 2000)

General Wage Determination

Publication

General wage determinations issued

under the Davis-Bacon and related Acts,

including those noted above, may be

found in the Government Printing Office

(GPO) document entitled ‘‘General Wage

Determinations Issued Under The DavisBacon and Related Acts.’’ This

publication is available at each of the 50

Regional Government Depository

Libraries and many of the 1,400

Government Depository Libraries across

the country.

The general wage determinations

issued under the Davis-Bacon and

related Acts are available electronically

by subscription to the FedWorld

Bulletin Board System of the National

Technical Information Service (NTIS) of

the U.S. Department of Commerce at 1–

800–363–2068.

Hard-copy subscriptions may be

purchased from: Superintendent of

Documents, U.S. Government Printing

Office, Washington, DC 20402, (202)

512–1800.

When ordering hard-copy

subscription(s), be sure to specify the

State(s) of interest, since subscriptions

may be ordered for any or all of the

seven separate volumes, arranged by

State. Subscriptions include an annual

24998 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 83 / Friday, April 28, 2000 / Notices

edition (issued in January or February)

which includes all current general wage

determinations for the States covered by

each volume. Throughout the remainder

of the year, regular weekly updates are

distributed to subscribers.

Signed at Washington, DC this 20th day of

April 2000.

Carl J. Poleskey,

Chief, Branch of Construction Wage

Determinations.

[FR Doc. 00–10344 Filed 4–27–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–27–M

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION

ADMINISTRATION

Agency Information Collection

Activities: Submission to OMB for

Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: National Credit Union

Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Request for comment.

SUMMARY: The NCUA is submitting the

following new information collection to

the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) for review and clearance under

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

(Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

This information collection is published

to obtain comments from the public.

DATES: Comments will be accepted until

June 27, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are

invited to submit written comments to

NCUA Clearance Officer or OMB

Reviewer listed below:

Clearance Officer: Mr. James L.

Baylen (703) 518–6411, National Credit

Union Administration, 1775 Duke

Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314–

3428, Fax No. 703–518–6433, E-mail:

jbaylen@ncua.gov.

OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt

(202) 395–7860, Office of Management

and Budget, Room 10226, New

Executive Office Building, Washington,

DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Copies of the information collection

requests, with applicable supporting

documentation, may be obtained by

calling the: NCUA Clearance Officer,

James L. Baylen, (703) 518–6411. It is

also available on the following website:

www.NCUA.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal

for the following collection of

information:

OMB Number: New.

Form Number: N/A.

Type of Review: New.

Title: Office of Community

Development Credit Unions Annual

Survey Report.

Respondents: Certain low-income

designated credit unions.

Estimated No. of Respondents/

Recordkeepers: 50.

Estimated Burden Hours Per

Response: 3.25 hours.

Frequency of Response: On occasion.

Estimated Total Annual Burden

Hours: 162.

Estimated Total Annual Cost: N/A.

By the National Credit Union

Administration Board on April 19, 2000.

Becky Baker,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 00–10617 Filed 4–27–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7535–01–U

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

Agency Information Collection

Activities: Submission for OMB

Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC).

ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of

information collection and solicitation

of public comment.

SUMMARY: The NRC has recently

submitted to OMB for review the

following proposal for the collection of

information under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44

U.S.C. Chapter 35). The NRC hereby

informs potential respondents that an

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and

that a person is not required to respond

to, a collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid OMB control

number.

1. Type of submission, new, revision,

or extension: Revision.

2. The title of the information

collection: Reports Concerning Possible

Non-Routine Emergency Generic

Problems.

3. The form number if applicable:

N/A.

4. How often the collection is

required: On occasion.

5. Who will be required or asked to

report: Nuclear power plant, non-power

reactor, and materials applicants and

licensees.

6. An estimate of the number of

responses: 203.

7. The estimated number of annual

respondents: 203 (103 reactor licensees:

100 materials licensees).

8. An estimate of the total number of

hours needed annually to complete the

requirement or request: 43,260 (420

hours per reactor licensee respondent);

10,000 (100 hours per materials licensee

respondent).

9. An indication of whether Section

3507(d), Pub. L. 104–13 applies: N/A.

10. Abstract: NRC is requesting

approval authority to collect

information concerning non-routine,

emergency generic problems which

would require prompt action from NRC

to preclude potential threats to public

health and safety.

A copy of the final supporting

statement may be viewed free of charge

at the NRC Public Document Room,

2120 L Street, NW (lower level),

Washington, DC. OMB clearance

requests are available at the NRC

worldwide web site (http://

www.nrc.gov/NRC/PUBLIC/OMB/

index.html). The document will be

available on the NRC home page site for

60 days after the signature date of this

notice.

Comments and questions should be

directed to the OMB reviewer listed

below by May 30, 2000. Comments

received after this date will be

considered if it is practical to do so, but

assurance of consideration cannot be

given to comments received after this

date. Erik Godwin, Office of Information

and Regulatory Affairs (3150–0012),

NEOB–10202, Office of Management

and Budget, Washington, DC 20503.

Comments can also be submitted by

telephone at (202) 395–3087.

The NRC Clearance Officer is Brenda

Jo. Shelton, 301–415–7233.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day

of April 2000.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Brenda Jo. Shelton,

NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief

Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 00–10662 Filed 4–27–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

Agency Information Collection

Activities: Submission for OMB

Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC).

ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of

information collection and solicitation

of public comment.

SUMMARY: The NRC has recently

submitted to OMB for review the

following proposal for the collection of

information under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44

U.S.C. Chapter 35). The NRC hereby

informs potential respondents that an

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and

that a person is not required to respond

to, a collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid OMB control

number.