alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### KNIGHT v. PAYNE, PAYMASTER.

Militia law — fines—notice—court of inquiry.

The militia law requires notice of the fines assessed by the court of inquiry to be posted, and . unless that is done, a right of action for the fine is not made out against a delinquent.

On trial for such fine, the paymaster should prove the notice, which should appear on the record.

Error to the Common Pleas. This case was originally brought by Payne before a justice of the peace, for a fine of $¡10 25, assessed *370against the defendant as a militia officer. At the trial, the plaintiff produced a certified list from the court of appeals, showing a fine annexed to Knight’s name of $10 25. The defendant then offered evidence to show that he was not liable to fine, which the justice refused, and gave judgment for the plaintiff. The proceedings were removed to the Common Pleas by certiorari and affirmed. It is now assigned for error, that the court should have reversed the justice’s proceedings,

*Perkins,*for the plaintiff,

cited the twenty-eighth section of the militia law of 1820, and the thirty-ninth section of the act of 1831; 3 *Cranch,*331; *Com. Dig.*413.

*J. C. Paine,*contra,

cited 5 *O. R.*441; 1 *Phil. Ev.*150.

Bt the Court.

The militia law requires of the court of inquiry, after it has acted on the list of delinquents, to cause a *notice*to be posted, and suit brought within thirty days thereafter, if the fine is not paid. There is' no right of action, if the list has not been advertised the time required. The paymaster should have proven the notice, and the omission to do so left him with no right to a judgment. The judgment is reversed with costs, and remanded to the Court of Common Pleas, with instructions to reverse the judgment of the justice, and set the cause for hearing under the statute.
Exhibit
32.2








Certification of the Chief Financial Officer




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350




(Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I, James R. Gordon, the Senior Executive Vice President and Principal
Financial Officer of The South Financial Group, Inc. (“TSFG”) certify that to
the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 of TSFG (the “Report”):




(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TSFG.








/s/ James R.
Gordon




James R. Gordon


Senior Executive Vice President and Principal Financial
Officer


The South Financial Group, Inc.




August 6, 2010








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The South
Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by The South Financial Group, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Wells Real Estate Fund II (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells,
III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/  LEO F. WELLS, III 
|-----------------------
|                       
|Leo F. Wells, III      
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 7, 2003       



|/s/  DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
|------------------------
|                        
|Douglas P. Williams     
|Chief Financial Officer 
|November 7, 2003
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 12, 2014

No. 04

- 14

- 00713

- CR

Ex parte Anthony Ray PERRYMAN

From the 399th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR10581

Honorable Ray Olivarri , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the c ourt’s opinion of this date, th is appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF JURISDICTION

.

It is so ORDERED on November 12, 2014

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of November, 2014

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 14, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-352 Lower Tribunal No. 15-1552 SP

________________ 

### Velo Chiro Fizik Inc., a/a/o Leosmel Rodriguez, Appellant,
vs. 

### Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company , Appellee. An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Milena Abreu, Judge. Law Office of Chad A. Barr, P.A., and Chad A. Barr (Altamonte Springs), for appellant. Shutts & Bowen LLP, and Daniel E. Nordby, Jason Gonzalez (Tallahassee), and Garrett A. Tozier (Tampa), for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Orthopedic Specialists, 212 So. 3d 973, 979 (Fla. 2017) (“Allstate's PIP policy provides legally sufficient notice of Allstate's election to use the permissive Medicare fee schedules identified in section 627.736(5)(a) 2. to limit reimbursements.”).
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: **Garnett, Kim** Sent: **Wednesday, October 08, 2014 11:55 AM** To: **Ogulei, David** Subject: **FW: Veolia comment responses**

From: John Cooper [mailto:jacooper@cooperenvironmental.c om]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 12:46 PM
To: Garnett, Kim
Cc: Bivins, Dan; andreag@cooperenvironmental.com Subject: RE: Veolia comment responses

Hi Kim, Yes, I will send you an email – early next week be OK? I will not be attending AWMA, but CES’ Andrea Geige r will be attending and presenting Krag Petterson’s paper on the ETV testing of the Xact 625. She would be happy to talk with David Ogulei. However, she will only be there on Thursday. Can you send David’s contact info.? John

From: Garnett, Kim [ mailto:Garnett.Kim@epa.gov ] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 7:24 AM To: John Cooper Cc: Bivins, Dan Subject: Veolia comment responses



### John,

**First of all – Thank you so very much for your assi stance in responding to the Veolia comments.**  **We really appreciate your help. And if you don’t mind**  **, we have one more request.**

**We heard back from Region 5 this morning and they a re wondering if it would be possible for you to**  **send us an email summarizing your comments on the l ead time for the multi-metals system so that**  **we can add it to the record. It doesn’t need to be a legal declaration or anything, just an email sta**  **ting that the multi-metals CEMS is feasible for Veolia’s**  **operations, and can be installed within the timeframe we are talking about (~within 6 months).** 

**Let me know if you have any questions.**

**Also, the lawyer in Region 5 – David Ogulei – is wo ndering if you are going to the AWMA meeting**  **next week. If so, he will be there and would like to introduce himself.** 

**Thanks again for your help with this.**

**Have a great weekend!**

**Kim**2 Kim Garnett Engineer USEPA/OAQPS/MTG (E143-02) 109 TW Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 TEL-(919)541-1158/FAX-(919)541-0516 garnett.kim@epa.gov
§ 119.59 Conducting tests and inspections. ( a ) At any time or place, the Administrator may conduct an inspection or test to determine whether a certificate holder under this part is complying with title 49 of the United States Code, applicable regulations, the certificate, or the certificate holder's operations specifications.
( b ) The certificate holder must— ( 1 ) Make available to the Administrator at the certificate holder's principal base of operations— ( i ) The certificate holder's Air Carrier Certificate or the certificate holder's Operating Certificate and the certificate holder's operations specifications; and
( ii ) A current listing that will include the location and persons responsible for each record, document, and report required to be kept by the certificate holder under title 49 of the United States Code applicable to the operation of the certificate holder.
( 2 ) Allow the Administrator to make any test or inspection to determine compliance respecting any matter stated in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Each employee of, or person used by, the certificate holder who is responsible for maintaining the certificate holder's records must make those records available to the Administrator.
( d ) The Administrator may determine a certificate holder's continued eligibility to hold its certificate and/or operations specifications on any grounds listed in paragraph (a) of this section, or any other appropriate grounds.
( e ) Failure by any certificate holder to make available to the Administrator upon request, the certificate, operations specifications, or any required record, document, or report is grounds for suspension of all or any part of the certificate holder's certificate and operations specifications.
( f ) In the case of operators conducting intrastate common carriage operations, these inspections and tests include inspections and tests of financial books and records.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         789,064
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,299,192
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,436,211
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,707,491
<PP&E>                                         315,420
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,423,295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,005,662
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,121
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,339,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,423,295
<SALES>                                     11,343,064
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,343,064
<CGS>                                        9,984,051
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,984,051
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,588,877
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,229,864)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,315,970
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,545,834)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,545,834)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.71)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10638]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or Partially Exclusive 
Licensing of U.S. Patent Application Concerning Prolonged Storage of 
Red Blood Cells

AGENCY: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, Department of 
the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6, announcement is made of the 
availability for licensing of U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/
154,102 entitled ``Prolonged Storage of Red Blood Cells'', filed 16 
September 1998. This patent has been assigned to the United States 
Government as represented by the Secretary of the Army.

ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command, 
ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, 
Frederick, Maryland 21702-5012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jay P. Winchester, Attorney-
Advisor, (301) 619-2065 or telefax (301) 619-5034.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The invention discloses novel additive 
solutions useful for the storage of human red blood cells (RBCs) under 
refrigerated conditions. Also disclosed is a method of using the 
additive solutions in an appropriate volume to preserve RBCs at about 
1 deg. to 6 deg. for up to 10 weeks. Additive solutions and processes 
in accordance with this invention allow the viable storage of human 
RBCs for an extended period of time in a solution which is directly 
infusible into humans.

Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-10638 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Exhibit B

COR3 Letter

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24219-2 Filed:05/16/23 Entered:05/16/23 18:54:03 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT B COR3 LETTER Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24219-2 Filed:05/16/23 Entered:05/16/23 18:54:03 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT B COR3 LETTER Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24219-2 Filed:05/16/23 Entered:05/16/23 18:54:03 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT B COR3 LETTER Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [DA-00-868] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

On April 13, 2000, the FCC approved the application of CODETEL International Communications Corporation (CIC) to provide international message telephone service (IMTS) between the United States and Cuba transiting the Dominican Republic, subject to specific conditions. 

                        CIC plans to offer service to Cuba using facilities of Compan                                                ia Dominicana de Tele                                                fonos (CODETEL), the dominant carrier in the Dominican Republic, with which CIC is affiliated within the meaning of 47 CFR 63.09(e). The U.S.-Dominican Republic portion of the traffic will be carried over a submarine cable owned by CODETEL. The Dominican Republic-Cuba portion of the traffic will travel over satellite circuits already in use for CODETEL's traffic with Cuba.                     

The FCC found that granting CIC's application would serve the public interest under Section 214 of the Act, by increasing competition on the U.S.-Cuba international services route and providing more choices to U.S. consumers. 

# DATES:

April 13, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:

J. Breck Blalock, Chief, Policy and Facilities Branch, (202) 418-1460. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Rebecca Arbogast, 

Chief, Telecommunications Division, International Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 00-10754 Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 10.12
 
 
 th
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,




---



##### 



WHEREAS
 EFFECTIVE DATE:
  NOW THEREFORE,
 ASSIGNMENT
 provided however
 TERM
  3.2 TERM OF AGREEMENT




---



##### 



PRICING
  ALL OTHER TERMS
   Accepted for: Verso Verilink, LLC
    
    Accepted for: Verizon Services Corp. (AVerizon Company)Signature:
    
    /s/ Larry Schwartz
    
    Signature:
    
    /s/ Alan PolonskyTyped Name: Larry Schwartz
    
    Typed Name: Alan PolonskyTitle: Vice President
    
    Title: DirectorDate: July 26, 2006
    
    Date: 7/28/06
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3606 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3606

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage 
            penalty in the contribution rules for Roth IRAs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2003

  Mr. Hefley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage 
            penalty in the contribution rules for Roth IRAs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF MARRIAGE PENALTY IN CONTRIBUTION RULES FOR 
              ROTH IRAS.

    (a) Phaseout Range.--Clause (ii) of section 408A(c)(3)(A) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to dollar limit) is amended to 
read as follows:
                            ``(ii) $15,000 ($30,000 in the case of a 
                        joint return).''.
    (b) Phaseout Threshold.--Clause (ii) of section 408A(c)(3)(C) of 
such Code is amended--
            (1) in subclause (I)--
                    (A) by striking ``$150,000'' and inserting 
                ``$190,000'', and
                    (B) by inserting ``and'' at the end,
            (2) by striking ``, and'' and inserting a period, and
            (3) by striking subclause (III).
    (c) Rollover From IRA.--Subparagraph (B) of section 408A(c)(3) of 
such Code is amended by striking ``relates--'' and all that follows and 
inserting ``relates, the taxpayer's adjusted gross income exceeds 
$100,000 ($200,000 in the case of a joint return).''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
II 

Calendar No. 496 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3839 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2719 South Webster Street in Kokomo, Indiana, as the ‘‘Opha May 

Johnson Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2020 

Mr. YOUNG (for himself and Mr. BRAUN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JULY 23, 2020 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2719 South Webster Street in Kokomo, Indiana, as the ‘‘Opha May Johnson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OPHA MAY JOHNSON POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 2719 South Webster Street in 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3839 RS

1 Kokomo, Indiana, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Opha May Johnson Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Opha May Johnson 

7 Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 496 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3839 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. in Kokomo, Indiana, as the ‘‘Opha May Johnson al Service located at 2719 South Webster Street 

JULY 23, 2020 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# United Stat es Court of A ppeals For the First C ircuit

No. 03-2337 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. MARY REGINA ELIZABETH GORSUCH, Defendant, Appellee. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on July 14, 2004 is amended as follows: On page 2, line 3, replace 'revolver' with 'handgun.'
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 22

- 40 59

_____________________________
C HRISTOPHER C. B OTTO , Appellant,

v.

R ICKY D. D IXON , Secretary
, Florida Department o f Corrections,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. J. Lee Marsh , Judge

. January 26, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , W INOKUR , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Christopher C. Botto , pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sheron Wells, Assistant Attorney General
, Tallahassee; Dan Johnson , General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee , for Appellee.