alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
condensed  consolidated  balance sheet of Transnational  Industries,  Inc. as of
April 30, 1999 and the related  condensed  consolidated  statement of operations
and  statement of cash flows for the three months then ended and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                              53
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2058
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       1462
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3673
<PP&E>                                            2822
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3233
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         73
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                        2795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6728
<SALES>                                           2550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2550
<CGS>                                             1808
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   189
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    144
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                135
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       135
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26


</TABLE>
### Geology and coal resources of the Walsenburg area, Huerfano County, Colorado

By: Ross Byron Johnson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1042O

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (1814 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 47**                            (11672 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 48**                            (248 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 49**                            (337 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 1221.200 Scope.

This subpart establishes procedures for nominating an astronaut for the Congressional Space Medal of Honor.
#### FREER, FOR CLARK, *v.*LOVE’S ADMINISTRATOR.

Costs — administrator’s time to settle — administration de bonis.

In suits against an administrator within eighteen months after administration, or the tim<? allowed for settlement of the estate, no costs shall be recovered.

This rule applies to an administrator de bonis non as well as to an original giant of administration.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas. The suit in the court below was brought against an administrator, on the 15th March, 1828. The plaintiff recovered judgment, and the question was whether he could recover costs. It appeared that in June, 1824, the will of Love was proven, and Geddes qualified as executor under it. In April, 1826, the court gave the executor time to settle the estate, until November, 1826. Before that time the executor died, and at November term, 1827, Freer was appointed administrator, and qualified. The Court of Common Pleas refused judgment for costs.

By the Court.

The simple question in this- case is, whether under the facts disclosed, the plaintiff was entitled to recover costs. It appears the suit was brought within a year after administration was granted. But it is urged, that as the suit was brought after the expiration of the time allowed to the *executor,*costs should be allowed. The law provides that no costs shall *be*recovered in suits against administrators, commenced within a year from the date of the letters on administration, or within the time allowed by the court to settle the estate, unless after a year the account shall have been presented and payment refused. 22 *O. L.*129. This suit was brought within a year, and is expressly within the prohibitary statute.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10333]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2147-000]


PowerGasSmart.com, Inc.; Notice of Filing

April 20, 2000.
    Take notice that on April 3, 2000, PowerGasSmart.com, Inc. filed a 
name change with their quarterly report for the quarter ending March 
31, 2000. The quarterly report was noticed on April 10, 2000, but the 
name change was not.
    The legal name change was as follows:

Old: Wilson Power & Gas Smart, Inc.
New: PowerGasSmart.com, Inc.

    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before May 1, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10333 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Cheshire *v.*The State.

*False Pretense.*

(Decided February 3, 1914.

64 South. 544.)

1. *False Pretense; Evidence.*— It is not necessary or essential to a conviction for obtaining money under false pretenses that the state should show that defendant obtained the exact amount of money mentioned in the indictment.

2. *Charge of Court; Directing Verdict.*— Where there was evidence tending to establish the charge made in the indictment, the court could not properly direct a verdict of acquittal.

*140Appeal from. Pike Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

Ed Cheshire was convicted of obtaining money under false pretences, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

Charge 1 is the general affirmative charge.

Charge 5: “If all the evidence in the case considered together fails to convince you beyond all reasonable doubt that defendant received from J. S. Dunn $80, and that this $80 was obtained from said Dunn by reason of defendant’s fraudulent representation as to the title of the oxen, it is your duty to acquit defendant.”

D. A. Baker, for appellant. No brief reached the Reporter.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

WALKER, P. J.

Of several rulings which the record presents for review, it is not deemed necessary to say more than that obviously in none of them was there any error.

Written charge 5 requested by the defendant was properly refused, as, for the state to sustain the charge made by the indictment, it was not required to prove that the defendant in the manner' alleged obtained the exact amount of money mentioned in the indictment; the averment of amount not being of an essential ingredient of the offense *charged.*— Hope *v. State,*5 Ala. App. 123, 59 South. 326; *Davis v. State,*3 Ala. App. 71, 57 South. 493.

As there was evidence tending to prove the charge made in the indictment, written charge 1 requested by the defendant was properly refused.

Affirmed.
No. 76-6677.

#### Bell *v.*Putman, Warden.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 791.5 Scheduling of board meetings. ( a ) *Meeting calls* — ( 1 ) *Regular meetings.* The Board will hold regular meetings each month unless there is no business or a quorum is not available. The Secretary of the Board will coordinate the dates for meetings.
( 2 ) *Special meetings.* The Chairman shall call special meetings either on the Chairman's own initiative or within fourteen days of a request from two Board members that is accompanied by an NCUA B-1 form and a Board Action Memorandum that states the specific issue(s) or action(s) to be considered by the Board.
( b ) *Notice of meetings* — ( 1 ) *Notifying the public.* The Sunshine Act and subpart C set forth the procedures for notifying the public of Board meetings.
( 2 ) *Notifying board members* — ( i ) *Special meetings.* Except in cases of emergency, as determined by a majority of the Board, each Board member is entitled to receive notice of any special meeting at least twenty-four hours in advance of such meeting. The notice shall set forth the place, day, hour, and nature of business to be transacted at the meeting. In cases of emergency a record of the vote, including a statement explaining the decision that an emergency exists, will be maintained.
( ii ) *Regular meetings.* Each Board member is entitled to receive notice of the agenda and/or notice of any changes in the subject matter of such meetings concurrent with the public release of such notices under the Sunshine Act. Each Board member shall be entitled to at least twenty-four hours advance notice of the consideration of a particular subject matter, except in cases of emergency as determined by a majority of the Board. In cases of emergency, a record of the vote, including a statement explaining the decision that an emergency exists, will be maintained.
[53 FR 29647, Aug. 8, 1988, as amended at 62 FR 64267, Dec. 5, 1997; 63 FR 5859, Feb. 5, 1998; 75 FR 34623, June 18, 2010]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, that a meeting of the Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail Advisory Council will be held May 24, 2000 at 9:30 am, at the town hall in Whitehall, Alabama. 

The Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail Advisory Council was established pursuant to Public Law 100-192 establishing the Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail. This law was put in place to advise the National Park Service on such issues as preservation of trail routes and features, public use, standards for posting and maintaining trail markers, and administrative matters. 

The matters to be discussed include: 

A. Update on status of Cultural Resource Inventory. 

B. Update of High priority projects. 

C. Further define high priority projects as input to ALDOT application for FY 2001 Scenic Byways funds. The application is due June 2000. 

D. Update on Welcome Center at the Tent City Site. 

The meeting will be open to the public. However, facilities and space for accommodating members of the public are limited and persons will be accommodated on first come, first serve basis. Any member of the public may file a written statement concerning the matters to be discussed with Lee Edwards, Trail Superintendent.

Person wishing further information concerning this meeting, or who wish to submit written statements may contact Lee Edwards, Trail Superintendent, Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail, P.O. Box 5690, Montgomery, AL 36103, telephone 334-353-3744 or 334-727-6390. 

Lee Edwards, 

Trail Superintendent. 

[FR Doc. 00-10587 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-U
# Official Journal C 125/29 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 125 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4929 May 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 125

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4929 May 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2006/C 125/1 | | s2 |
| 2006/C 125/2 | | s2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2006/C 125/1

s2

2006/C 125/2

s2

---

| | I   Information |
| --- | --- |
| | EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT |
| 2006/C 125/3 | WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERList of titles of Written Questions by Members of the European Parliament indicating the number, original language, author, political group, institution addressed, date submitted and subject of the question | 1 |

I   Information

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2006/C 125/3

WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERList of titles of Written Questions by Members of the European Parliament indicating the number, original language, author, political group, institution addressed, date submitted and subject of the question

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
42641.

#### GRIFFITH v. MORGAN.

Submitted March 6, 1967

Decided March 17, 1967

Rehearing denied March 29, 1967.

*519*Swift, Currie, McGhee & Iiiers, Robert S. Harkey,*for appellant.

*Cook, Pleger & Boulogne, J. Vincent Cook,*for appellee.

Felton, Chief Judge.

It appears that the petition was amended subsequently to the date of entry of the judgment appealed from and prior to the filing of the appeal. Demurrers filed before a *material*amendment to the petition do not cover the amended petition. *Bruce v. Roberts,*219 Ga. 394 (133 SE2d 327) and cit.; *Jackson’s Mill &c. Co. v. Holliday,*108 Ga. App. 663 (1) (134 SE2d 563) and cit. Since the materiality of the amendment is not shown by the record to have been ruled on by the trial court, it cannot, in the posture here, be determined for the first time by this court, which is a court for the correction of errors of law alone. *Code Ann.*§§ 2-3704, 2-3708 (Ga. L. 1945, p. 8, Const, of 1945); *Code Ann.*§ 6-701 (Ga. L. *5201965, p. 18); *Interstate Fire Ins. Co. v. Chattam,*222 Ga. 436, 437 (150 SE2d 618). Since the case is still pending in the trial court with a timely amendment on file which may be material, there is no appealable judgment with which this court may now deal. *National Surety Corp. v. Hunt,*105 Ga. App. 101 (123 SE2d 558); *Gillon v. Johns,*105 Ga. App. 599 (125 SE2d 70).

Accordingly, the appeal, not being from an appealable judgment, is premature and must be dismissed as authorized by *Code Ann.*§ 6-809 (b 2) (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 493, 500).

*Appeal dismissed. Hall and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice sets forth the date of the thirty-second meeting of the Gettysburg National Military Park Advisory Commission.

# DATES:

.The public meeting will be held on May 18, 2000, from 7 p.m.-9 p.m.

# LOCATION:

The meeting will be held at the Cyclorama Auditorium, 125 Taneytown Road, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325.

# AGENDA:

Sub-Committee Reports, Federal Consistency Projects Within the Gettysburg Battlefield Historic District, Operational Update on Park Activities, and Citizens Open Forum.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John A. Latschar, Superintendent, Gettysburg National Military Park, 97 Taneytown Road, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public. Any member of the public may file with the Commission a written statement concerning agenda items. The statement should be addressed to the Advisory Commission, Gettysburg National Military Park, 97 Taneytown Road, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325. Minutes of the meeting will be available for inspection four weeks after the meeting at the permanent headquarters of the Gettysburg National Military Park located at 97 Taneytown Road, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325.

Dated: April 17, 2000.

John A. Latschar,

Superintendent, Gettysburg NMP/Eisenhower NHS.

[FR Doc. 00-10377 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
#### GELDER V. THE STATE.

(Decided December 18, 1913.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

. Heard before Hon. William E. Fort.

No counsel marked for appellant. . R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for tlie State.

Thomas, J.

No error.

Affirmed.
BREAKOUT SESSION 

DISCUSSION POINTS –

HEALTHCARE

NIOSH Personal Protective Equipment 

Conformity Assessment Public Meeting
1) Who defines the BHSRs for your industry?

• *FDA has been included in our activities

• *OSHA

• *Joint Commission drives implementation

• *CDC guidelines and recommendations

• AHA – American Hospital Association

• SEIU – Service Employees International Union

• *Users - AMA, ACOEM, ANA, AOHP, ACGHI, AIHA, 

ASTHO

• Infection Prevention – APIC

• NRC – Ionization Energy

• AAMI
2) How should the BHSRs be established?

• General Duty Clause

• Tb and Biological/Infection Control Guidelines – CDC---

OSHA/Joint Commission

• Everything else – laser use, chemotherapy, PPE 

• Worker and Patient Protection Synergy needed

• Hazardous Waste Protocols also
3) Who should address what PPE is 

needed to meet BHSRs?

• Need selection and application guide aligned for patient 

and worker, community health and safety

• Education programs for HCW’s in general

• EPA model for exposures and PPE needed

• Comes down to threat recognition and action by the 

worker, no system of checks and balances

• Health and safety driven – initial training, unit specific training

• System protection is emphasized, not worker protection

Need strong risk assessment and OSH professionals
4) Who determines the technical standards that 

demonstrate the BHSRs are met?

• Voluntary FDA and CDC (advisory committee APIC), 

NIOSH

• Practice of medicine is not regulated by the agencies, the devices 

are regulated

• ACOEM (MC)

This was a challenging question for our group, answers did 

not jump out! We noted the European Union Approach –

the government provides the scheme for identifying basic 

health and safety requirements and the standards –

facilitates the safety culture
5) How are conformity assessment 

requirements linked to PPE types?

• The need for CA was emphasized, beyond device 

approval, risk driven conformity – when can the cheap 

one be used, when is the more specific device needed, 

how are devices assessed?

Planned event and unplanned events

Missing periodic assessment – use patient control 

measures/assessments to indirectly assess occupational 

safety and health – mesh the two together

Procurement issues also considered!! Value Analysis 

Committee to assess patient concerns, worker concerns 

and procurement decisions.
Anything else we need to consider?

• Have the key partners at the table

• Failure is the lack of use, compliance issue, not CA of the 

certified product

• CA should be considered by the industry

• Respiratory regulation is working but procurement issues still exist