alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                  EXHIBIT 10.13

                           GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION

          SCHEDULE OF RECIPIENTS OF EXECUTIVE SEPARATION AGREEMENTS (1)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
RECIPIENT                                      PAYOUT PERIOD (2)
<S>                                            <C>
Howard Cohen                                          (3)
David Calabro                                      12 months
Marc Crisafulli                                    12 months
Kathleen McKeough                                  12 months
Timothy Nyman                                      12 months
Jaymin Patel                                       12 months
Antonio Carlos Rocha                               12 months
Larry Smith                                        12 months
Donald Sweitzer                                    12 months
W. Bruce Turner                                       (4)
</TABLE>

--------------------------

1.       Sets forth recipients who are, or who were during fiscal 2003,
executive officers and/or directors of GTECH Holdings Corporation and who are
currently parties to separation agreements.

2.       Executive is to receive continuation of his base salary at time of
separation, plus certain health, insurance and other benefits for the respective
number of months indicated.

3.       See Agreement, dated March 5, 2001, as amended, between Howard Cohen
and the Company. Employment terminated August 2002. See Separation Agreement and
Mutual Release, dated as of December 13, 2002, by and among the Company, GTECH
Corporation and Howard S. Cohen.

4.       See Agreement, dated as of August 6, 2002, between W. Bruce Turner and
the Company.
§ 1241.10 Covered medical care. ( a ) Subject to the limitations in paragraph (b) of this section, an eligible individual, as defined in § 1241.15, is eligible for: ( 1 ) Monitoring and diagnosis for potentially spaceflight-associated conditions; and
( 2 ) Treatment for spaceflight-associated conditions.
( b ) Medical monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment authorized and described in paragraph (a) of this section will not be provided for any condition that is found by the NASA Administrator or designee to have resulted from a cause other than the eligible individual's participation in spaceflight-related activities. Should a condition be diagnosed that is not related to spaceflight, the individual will be referred to their primary care physician.
( c ) Medical monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment authorized and described in paragraph (a) of this section may be provided by a local health care provider if the NASA Administrator or designee determines it is unadvisable for the eligible individual to travel to the NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) due to the individual's condition or if it is otherwise advantageous to the Government.
( d ) Medical monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment authorized and described in paragraph (a) of this section will be provided without a cost sharing obligation imposed on the eligible individual.
( e ) NASA is a secondary payer.
## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

____________ No. 05-4525
I SAAC J OHNSON , Applicant , v.

B RADLEY J. R OBERT , Warden, Centralia Correctional Center, Respondent

.

____________ Application for Permission to Initiate a Second or Successive Collateral Attack

____________ S UBMITTED D ECEMBER 9, 2005—D ECIDED D ECEMBER 15, 2005

____________

Before B AUER , E ASTERBROOK , and R OVNER , Circuit Judges

. P ER C URIAM . Isaac Johnson seeks permission to initiate another collateral attack on his conviction and 80-year sentence for murder. See 28 U.S.C. §2244(b)(3). Although his application is not entirely clear, he relies in substantial part on Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and implies that he would invoke Blakely v. Washington , 542 U.S. 296 (2004), which elaborates on how Apprendi applies to sentencing in state prosecutions. Apprendi was decided several years ago, and Blakely was issued on June 24, 2004. Johnson’s application under §2244(b)(3) was not filed until December 7, 2005, more than a year later.2 No. 05-4525
Because 28 U.S.C. §2244(d)(1) establishes a one-year period of limitations, Johnson’s application is too late. Theyear usually runs from the date on which the conviction became final, which for Johnson was long before the Supreme Court decided Apprendi . A proviso in §2244(d)(1)(C) restarts the clock on “the date on which the constitutional right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if the right has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review”. Whether we use Apprendi

or Blakely as the benchmark, “the date on which the constitutional right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court” is more than a year before Johnson filed this application. The Supreme Court held in Dodd v. United States , 125 S. Ct. 2478 (2005), that a provision in 28 U.S.C. §2255 materially identical to §2244(d)(1)(C) runs from the date the right was initially recognized, even if the Court does not declare that right to be retroactive until later. Dodd is equally applicable to §2244(d)(1)(C), so there is no point in authorizing Johnson to file another collateral attack. Because he waited too long, it is unnecessary to decide whether his claim would be a substantial one on the merits.

Johnson adverts to a number of other potential contentions, such as the possibility that his trial lawyer furnished ineffective assistance, but these likewise would be untimely. Johnson should have pursued them in his initial federal collateral attack. The application is denied.No. 05-4525 3
A true Copy:
Teste:

________________________________ Clerk of the United States Court of

Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

USCA-02-C-0072—12-23-05
This data directory and user guide lists (or inventories, catalogs, etc.) explains

the data used in developing EPA’s proposed rule, Water Quality Standards for

the State of Florida’s Estuaries, Coastal Waters, and South Florida Inland Flowing

Waters

. The complete dataset is available for review at the EPA Docket Center,

Public Reading Room. To view or receive a copy of the dataset, contact the EPA

Docket Center as follows:

In person/writing:

Environmental Protection Agency, Docket Center

1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T, Room 3334

Washington, DC 20004

By Telephone:

202

­ 566

­ 1744

By Fax:

202

­ 566

­ 9744

By Email:

docket

­ customerservice@epa.gov
#### § 1201.102 Functions.

In order to carry out the purpose of the Act, NASA is authorized to conduct research for the solution of problems of flight within and outside the Earth's atmosphere; to develop, construct, test, and operate aeronautical and space vehicles for research purposes; to operate a space transportation system including the space shuttle, upper stages, space program, space station, and related equipment; and to perform such other activities as may be required for the exploration of space. The term *aeronautical and space vehicles* means aircraft, missiles, satellites, and other space vehicles, together with related equipment, devices, components, and parts. It conducts activities required for the exploration of space with manned and unmanned vehicles and arranges for the most effective utilization of the scientific and engineering resources of the United States with other nations engaged in aeronautical and space activities for peaceful purposes.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 87 (Thursday, May 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10784]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33782]


Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Rail--Construction and Operation 
Exemption--White Bluff to Pine Bluff, AR

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the Board conditionally exempts from 
the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10901 the construction and 
operation by Entergy Rail of an 8.6-mile line of railroad from White 
Bluff to Pine Bluff, AR.

DATES: The exemption will not become effective until the environmental 
review process is completed. The Board will then issue a further 
decision addressing the environmental matters and establishing an 
exemption effective date, if appropriate. Petitions to reopen must be 
filed by May 24, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings, referring to STB Finance Docket No. 33782, 
to: (1) Surface Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, Case 
Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20423-0001; and (2) 
John R. Molm, Troutman Sanders LLP, 1300 I Street, N.W., Suite 500 
East, Washington, DC 20005-3314.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia M. Farr, (202) 565-1613. [TDD 
for the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-8339.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision available on our website at ``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: April 25, 2000.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Burkes, and 
Commissioner Clyburn.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10784 Filed 5-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82002-82003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32821]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Paducah

AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Paducah. The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that 
public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, January 20, 2011, 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Barkley Centre, 111 Memorial Drive, Paducah, Kentucky 42001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reinhard Knerr, Deputy Designated 
Federal Officer, Department of Energy Paducah Site Office, Post Office 
Box 1410, MS-103, Paducah, Kentucky 42001, (270) 441-6825.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management and related activities.

Tentative Agenda

     Call to Order, Introductions, Review of Agenda.
     Deputy Designated Federal Officer's Comments.
     Federal Coordinator's Comments.
     Liaisons' Comments.
     Administrative Issues.
     Presentations.
     Subcommittee Chairs' Comments.
     Public Comments.
     Final Comments.
     Adjourn.
    Breaks Taken As Appropriate.
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Paducah, welcomes the attendance 
of

[[Page 82003]]

the public at its advisory committee meetings and will make every 
effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or special 
needs. If you require special accommodations due to a disability, 
please contact Reinhard Knerr at least seven days in advance of the 
meeting at the telephone number listed above. Written statements may be 
filed with the Board either before or after the meeting. Individuals 
who wish to make oral statements pertaining to agenda items should 
contact Reinhard Knerr at the address or telephone number listed above. 
Requests must be received five days prior to the meeting and reasonable 
provision will be made to include the presentation in the agenda. The 
Deputy Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting 
in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Individuals wishing to make public comments will be provided a maximum 
of five minutes to present their comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Reinhard 
Knerr at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will also 
be available at the following Web site: http://www.pgdpcab.energy.gov/2010Meetings.html.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on December 22, 2010.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-32821 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
BULLETIN 1032 PLATE 4

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

EXPLANATION

PRE-CAMBRIAN

Fault showing op
mas?

Strike and dip of foliation
aero

‘Strike and dip of foliation
‘and plunge of lineation,

<a
‘Strike and dip of foliation
with lineation

Bearing of horizontal lineation
39 N

=
Plunge of minor anticline
20

eae, 2 a

wc sicerelces A pbs

rl bp A

(s 9

icine GONG,
LAS,

a OGM,

Foot of rae a ZG

ight

re chute Ui

S
AWN

SQVy
SS
.

WSK

NOS
ee te

AEN
NEL

WES
i
=
z

SS

ZB
yy snscnn iil
ore stingers
Ly aw,

Z of
a re ;
Moy, Wie fA
iy. x HAs"
Ly, Men ON i

fe

‘iia
Zi, Boot 200 of breccias wal rock

7 Brame deserted ast
7” sept and several tn Sere,

275 oF quarts, carbonate pyr
chalcopyrite, sphaterite, and
eaters

ey
‘QUATERNARY

PRE-CAMBRIAN
4

WSs Ss
SY NY WOR
SS, SN WS) GaN SSS
SARS SSS SR Qi ins WWW SRS
WQWOX SSSssg NUE SRR MRR RSS
2 ES NGA NINES
SS SST
SS is oF
SS SSS SSSSESS a
SSS SSS

SECTION ALONG CROSSCUT PART OF OLD STAG TUNNEL.

Geology by J. E. Harrison, 1952
GEOLOGIC MAP AND SECTION OF THE OLD STAG TUNNEL, FREELAND-LAMARTINE DISTRICT, COLORADO
oe 8 1 L L 1 ci
Datum is mean see level

370788 © - 56 (In pocket) No. 2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 21, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 21, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20A0697. KAYLA RAE LABBEE v. ATLANTA STRUCTURAL CONCRETE 

COMPANY et al.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Schedule 1 

Disclosure Statement1

1

 In the interest of economy, a hard copy of the Disclosure Statement will not be included as 

a schedule to the Disclosure Statement Order. A copy of the Disclosure Statement was 

filed on March 1, 2023 (Docket Entry No. 3297 in Case No. 17-4780), and is available on 

the Court’s docket, as well as on the website of the Debtor’s Balloting Agent, Kroll 

Restructuring Administration LLC (f/k/a Prime Clerk LLC) (“Kroll”), at 

https://cases.ra.kroll.com/puertorico/. A flash drive containing the Disclosure Statement 

and all exhibits thereto will be included in the Solicitation Packages. Hard copies of the 

Disclosure Statement are available on request by contacting Kroll by telephone at (844) 

822-9231 (toll free for U.S. and Puerto Rico) or (646) 486-7944 (for international callers), 

available 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time) (Spanish available), or by email 

at puertoricoinfo@ra.kroll.com. Please do not direct any inquiries to the Court. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23675-1 Filed:03/03/23 Entered:03/03/23 13:23:35 Desc:

Schedule 1 - Disclosure Statement Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) 
 I, Peter J. Bradford, President and Chief Executive Officer of Golden Star Resources Ltd., certify,
to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period
ended December 31, 2003 of Golden Star Resources Ltd. that: 
 
 (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 
 
 (2) The information contained and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Golden Star Resources Ltd. 
 /s/ PETER J. BRADFORD  February 3, 2005
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1). | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2). | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                July 19, 2005 | /s/Jeffrey                R. Scheffer  |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                               | Jeffrey                R. Scheffer     |
|                               | Chief                Executive Officer |
#### § 619.9130 Differential interest rates.

An interest rate program under which different rates of interest may be made applicable to individual or classes of loans on the basis of type, purpose, amount, quality of loan, or a combination of these factors.
###### Editorial Note on Part 710

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 710 appear at 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 710.0 Scope.

This part describes the requirements that must be followed to accomplish the voluntary liquidation of a Federal credit union. Federally insured state-chartered credit unions are only subject to the notification requirement provided in § 710.9; voluntary liquidation is to be accomplished in accordance with state law or procedures established by the state regulatory authority.
#### KATHERINE McLEAN, PROSECUTRIX-APPELLANT, v. HOWARD MACKAY, JUDGE OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BERGEN COUNTY, AND BOROUGH OF MAYWOOD, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES.

Submitted October 27, 1939

Decided January 25, 1940.

For the appellant, *Abram Waks (Paul Rittenberg,*of counsel).

For the appellees, *George S. Sauerbrey (Milton T. Lasher,*of counsel).

Per Curiam.

The facts in the instant appeal and the procedure below are substantially similar to those in *Town of Irvington*v. *Schneider,*120 *N. J. L.*460; 121 *Id.*542, the latter being the opinion of this court. In that case the conviction of defendant was affirmed in this court. Upon appeal to the United States Supreme Court, the judgment of conviction was *92reversed. *Clara Schneider, Petitioner,*v. *State (Town of*Irvington), *(United States Supreme Court,*No. 11, 1939 *Term),*84 *L. Ed. Advance Opinions*115. We consider the judgment of the United States Supreme Court in that case to be conclusive upon us in the instant appeal and that we must, therefore, reverse the judgment of our Supreme Court herein.

The judgment appealed from is reversed.

*For affirmance*— None.

*For reversal—The*Chancellor, Trenchard, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10409]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Advisory Eye Council.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Eye Council.
    Date: June 8, 2000.
    Open: 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
    Agenda: Following opening remarks by the Director, NEI, there 
will be presentations by the staff of the institute and discussions 
concerning institute programs and policies.
    Place: 6130 Executive Boulevard, Room G, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Closed: 11:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6130 Executive Boulevard, Room G, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Lois DeNinno, National Eye Institute, Executive 
Plaza South, Suite 350, 6120 Executive Blvd., MSC 7167, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-496-9110.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program NOs. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)
    Dated: April 19, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-10409 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### CLARK V. CLARK.

(Decided January 20, 1914.)

Appeal from Henry Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. M. Sollie.

W. L. Lee, for appellant. Bert Hayes, and Espey & Farmer, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed by appellant.