alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3717 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3717

   To increase the penalties for violations by television and radio 
   broadcasters of the prohibitions against transmission of obscene, 
                    indecent, and profane language.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 2004

   Mr. Upton (for himself, Mr. Markey, Mr. Tauzin, Mr. Dingell, Mr. 
Bilirakis, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Gillmor, Mr. Bass, Mr. 
 Greenwood, Mr. Burr, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Terry, Mr. Weldon of 
 Pennsylvania, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Green of Texas, Mrs. 
    Wilson of New Mexico, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Whitfield, Mrs. Bono, Ms. 
 McCarthy of Missouri, Mr. Wynn, Mrs. Cubin, and Mr. Pitts) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To increase the penalties for violations by television and radio 
   broadcasters of the prohibitions against transmission of obscene, 
                    indecent, and profane language.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 
2004''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN PENALTIES FOR OBSCENE, INDECENT, AND PROFANE 
              BROADCASTS.

    Section 503(b)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
503(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as 
        subparagraphs (D) and (E), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new 
        subparagraph:
    ``(C) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), if the violator is (i) a 
broadcast station licensee or permittee, or (ii) an applicant for any 
broadcast license, permit, certificate, or other instrument or 
authorization issued by the Commission, and the violator is determined 
by the Commission under paragraph (1) to have broadcast obscene, 
indecent, or profane language, the amount of any forfeiture penalty 
determined under this section shall not exceed $275,000 for each 
violation or each day of a continuing violation, except that the amount 
assessed for any continuing violation shall not exceed a total of 
$3,000,000 for any single act or failure to act.''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by paragraph (1), 
        by striking ``subparagraph (A) or (B)'' and inserting 
        ``subparagraph (A), (B), or (C)''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10474]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-251-000]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

April 21, 2000.
    Take notice that on April 19, 2000, Eastern Shore Natural Gas 
Company (ESNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, certain revised tariff sheets in the above 
captioned docket, bear a proposed effective date of April 1, 2000.
    ESNG states that the purpose of this instant filing is to track 
rate changes attributable to storage services purchased from 
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (Transco) under its Rate 
Schedules GSS and LSS. The costs of the above referenced storage 
services comprise the rates and charges payable under ESNG's Rate 
Schedules GSS and LSS. This tracking filing is being made pursuant to 
Section 3 of ESNG's Rate Schedules GSS and LSS.
    ESNG states that copies of the filing have been served upon its 
jurisdictional customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10474 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of TDI  Holding  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Blair
Zykan,  President,  CEO,  and CFO of the  company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Blair Zykan
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Blair Zykan, President/CEO/CFO

Dated:  8/15/03
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3732 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to further protect officers and 

employees of the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2020 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mr. COONS, Mr. COTTON, and Mr. LEAHY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to further protect 

officers and employees of the United States, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jaime Zapata and Vic5 tor Avila Federal Law Enforcement Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

7 It is the sense of Congress that— 

8 (1) since the founding of the Nation, officers 

9 and employees of the United States Government 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3732 IS

1 have dutifully and faithfully served the United 

2 States overseas, including in situations that place 

3 them at serious risk of death or bodily harm, in 

4 order to preserve, protect, and defend the interests 

5 of the United States; 

6 (2) securing the safety of such officers and em7 ployees while serving overseas is of paramount im8 portance and is also in furtherance of preserving, 

9 protecting, and defending the interests of the United 

10 States; 

11 (3) Federal courts, including the United States 

12 Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the United 

13 States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and 

14 the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh 

15 Circuit, have correctly interpreted section 1114 of 

16 title 18, United States Code, to apply 

17 extraterritorially to protect officers and employees of 

18 the United States while the officers and employees 

19 are serving abroad; 

20 (4) recently, in a case involving a violent attack 

21 against Federal law enforcement officers Jaime Za22 pata and Victor Avila, a panel of a Federal court of 

23 appeals held that section 1114 of title 18, United 

24 States Code, does not apply extraterritorially, creVerDate Sep 11 2014 15:51 Jun 03, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3732.IS S3732

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3732 IS

1 ating a split among the United States circuit courts 

2 of appeals; and 

3 (5) in light of the opinion described in para4 graph (4), it has become necessary for Congress to 

5 clarify the original intent that section 1114 of title 

6 18, United States Code, applies extraterritorially. 

7 SEC. 3. PROTECTION OF OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF 

8 THE UNITED STATES. 

9 Section 1114 of title 18, United States Code, is 

10 amended— 

11 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before 

12 ‘‘Whoever’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(b) EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION.—There is 

15 extraterritorial jurisdiction over the conduct prohibited by 

16 this section.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal L 326/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 326 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6216 December 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 326

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6216 December 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2100 of 30 September 2019 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 with regard to updates of the taxonomy to be used for the single electronic reporting format (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2100 of 30 September 2019 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 with regard to updates of the taxonomy to be used for the single electronic reporting format (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**    Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1). | The                Report                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2). | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                April                18, 2007 | /s/Douglas                I. Payne             |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                                               | Douglas                I.                Payne |
|                                               | Chief                Financial Officer         |
###### Editorial Note on Part 749

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 749, appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 749.3 Vital records center.

A vital records center is defined as a storage facility, which may include another federally insured credit union, at any location far enough from the credit union's offices to avoid the simultaneous loss of both sets of records in the event of a catastrophic act. A credit union must maintain or contract with a third party to maintain any equipment or software for its vital records center necessary to access records.

[72 FR 42273, Aug. 2, 2007]
Consent of Independent Auditors', Deloitte & Touche LLP.



Exhibit 10(i) 
 
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT 
 
To the Board of Directors of 
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company 
 
  We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 18 to Registration Statement No. 33-7724
on Form N-4 of our reports dated February 17, 2003 for the Massachusetts Mutual Variable Annuity Separate Account 1 — Flex Extra (Qualified) Segment, and the Massachusetts Mutual Variable Annuity Separate Account
2 — Flex Extra (Non-Qualified) Segment, and of our report dated March 6, 2003, on Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (which report on Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
explanatory paragraphs referring to the use of statutory accounting practices and the adoption, effective January 1, 2001, of certain statutory accounting practices as a result of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Insurance’s
adoption of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual, which practices differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America) appearing in the Statement of
Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Statement of Additional Information. 
  
 DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 
  
 Hartford, Connecticut 
 April 24, 2003
#### Theodosia Horbal *vs.*Peter Kennedy, Administrator.

Third Judicial District.

Submitted on briefs June 2d

decided July 16th, 1915.

Suit to obtain a conveyance of an undivided interest in certain real estate standing of record in the name of the defendant’s intestate, who was the plaintiff’s husband, or, in lieu thereof, a judgment for damages, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in New Haven County, *Tuttle, J.;*facts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiff.

*No error.*

*Robert J. Woodruff,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Harold E. Drew,*for the appellee (defendant).

Opinion filed with the clerk of the Superior Court in New Haven County.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4(k)

                 NATIONWIDE LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY OF AMERICA

                                      RIDER

                        GUARANTEED MINIMUM DEATH BENEFIT



  RIDER ISSUE DATE       09/01/2002                  POLICY NUMBER     9,000,000

 This Rider is attached to and made part of this Policy.

If, during the term of this Rider, the Net Cash Surrender Value of the Policy to
which it is attached is not sufficient to cover the monthly deductions, we will
determine if the Minimum Guarantee Premium has been paid. If the Minimum
Guarantee Premium has been paid while this Rider is in effect, the Policy will
not go into the Grace Period as described in the Policy. If the Minimum
Guarantee Premium has not been paid while this Rider is in effect, the Grace
Period will begin.

To determine whether the Minimum Guarantee Premium has been paid, the sum of the
premiums paid into the Policy less any partial withdrawals and outstanding loans
must equal or exceed the Minimum Guarantee Premium.

At the end of the Death Benefit Guarantee Period provided under this Rider, the
Net Cash Surrender Value may be insufficient to keep the Policy in force unless
an additional payment is made at that time.

DEATH BENEFIT GUARANTEE PERIOD. The Death Benefit Guarantee Period is shown on
page 3 of the Policy Schedule. The Death Benefit Guarantee Period begins on the
Policy Date as shown on page 3 of the Policy Schedule.

COST. The cost of this Rider is $0.01 per $1,000 of Face Amount of the Policy to
which this Rider is attached. This amount will be included in the monthly
deductions for the Policy. The monthly deduction for this Rider will cease upon
the termination of this Rider.

REINSTATEMENT. If this Rider was in force when the Policy lapsed, you may
reinstate this Rider with the Policy. No payment of past premiums is required to
reinstate this Rider. Additional premiums may be necessary so that the Minimum
Guarantee Premium is paid.

TERMINATION. This Rider will terminate:

   1. upon written request;

   2. upon surrender or other termination of the Policy to which it is attached;

   3. at the expiry of the Death Benefit Guarantee Period.


Attached by the Company on the issue date of this Rider.

                                                             /s/ GARY D. MCMAHAN
                                                                       President

Form R2320
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA24-0161 JENNIFER BRICK,

Petitioner,
v. THE HONORABLE JUDGE TIERNEY, Judge of Bozeman Municipal Court, Bozeman, MT,

Respondent. GRANT OF MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PAYMENT OF FILING FEE



### Motionto proceed without payment ofthe filing fee in this matter is GRANTED. DATED March 18, 2024.

BOWEN GREENWOOD Clerk ofthe Supreme Court 03/18/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0161
42619.

#### GEORGIA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MORGAN.

Hall, Judge.

Georgia Laws 1960, pp. 289, 670 *(Code Ann.*§ 56-2427) provides that failure or refusal by an insurer to furnish forms for proof of loss for completion by the insured *upon written notice of a loss*shall constitute waiver of the right of the insurer to require proof of loss. See *Progressive Mut. Ins. Co. v. Burrell Motors, Inc.,*112 Ga. App. 88, 89 (143 SE2d 757); *Travelers Fire Ins. Co. v. Robertson,*103 Ga. App. 816 (120 SE2d 657).

The evidence before the court in this case on the defendant insurer’s motion for summary judgment showed that three or four days after the fire loss the insured’s husband gave for her to the insurer’s adjuster some invoices and a list of losses in writing, itemized according to quantities and prices of merchandise. These invoices were accepted by the insurer without any demand for further or specific notice. Nor was there any evidence that the insurer thereafter furnished forms for proof of loss for completion by the insured or asked for any more information or papers. Under these circumstances, the supplying of invoices and list of items claimed to have been lost in the fire is deemed to amount to a written notice as required by *Code Ann.*§ 56-2427. “This requirement of notice is intended merely to give the insurer information upon which it may take prompt action in commencing an investigation, and if the company does not take immediate action, it does so to its detriment.” Mitchell, Georgia Law on Insurance, 512, § 104-101.

*521
      *Felton, C. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*

Argued March 6, 1967 —

Decided March 17, 1967

Rehearing denied March 30, 1967 —

*B. Wilson Smith, Jr., John H. Smith,*for appellant.

“The burden is upon the moving party to establish a lack oí genuine issue of fact and the right to a judgment as a matter of law, and any doubt as to the existence of such an issue is resolved against the movant.” *Holland v. Sanfax Corp.,*106 Ga. App. 1, 4 (126 SE2d 442).

There being a genuine issue of fact as to whether the insurer waived its rights to require proof of loss by failing to furnish insured with forms therefor, the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant's motion for summary judgment.

*Judgment affirmed.*
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 81484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32458]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2005-TX-0012; FRL-9243-1]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; 
Emissions Banking and Trading of Allowances Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 16, 2010 (75 FR 69884), EPA published a direct 
final rule approving portions of four revisions to the Texas State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) that create and amend the Emissions Banking 
and Trading of Allowances (EBTA) Program. The EBTA Program establishes 
a cap and trade program to reduce emissions of oxides of nitrogen 
(NOX) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) from participating 
electric generating facilities in Texas. The direct final action was 
published without prior proposal because EPA anticipated no adverse 
comments. EPA stated in the direct final rule that if we received 
relevant, adverse comments by December 16, 2010, EPA would publish a 
timely withdrawal in the Federal Register. EPA subsequently received 
timely adverse comments on the direct final rule. Therefore, EPA is 
withdrawing the direct final approval. EPA will address all relevant, 
adverse comments submitted by December 16, 2010, in a subsequent final 
action based on the parallel proposal also published on November 16, 
2010 (75 FR 69909). As stated in the parallel proposal, EPA will not 
institute a second comment period on this action.

DATES: The direct final rule published on November 16, 2010 (75 FR 
69884), is withdrawn as of December 28, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Ms. Adina Wiley (6PD-R), Air Permits 
Section, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue 
(6PD-R), Suite 1200, Dallas, TX 75202-2733. The telephone number is 
(214) 665-2115. Ms. Wiley can also be reached via electronic mail at 
wiley.adina@epa.gov.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen 
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: December 15, 2010.
Al Armendariz,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 6.

0
Accordingly, the amendments to 40 CFR 52.2270 published in the Federal 
Register on November 16, 2010 (75 FR 69884), which were to become 
effective on January 18, 2011, are withdrawn.

[FR Doc. 2010-32458 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```