alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF
          PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of NT
Holding Corp. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, I, Alan Lew, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of NT Holding Corp. hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
          30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended September 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NT
          Holding Corp.

Dated:  November 19, 2004

NT HOLDING CORP.


By: /s/ Alan Lew
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 6, 1999, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Salutation Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, MicroBurst, Inc., Rockville, MD; TRG Products, Inc., Des Moines, IA; Dr. Tomohiro Takagi, Kawasaki-shi Kanagawa-ken, Japan; Infrared Data Association, Walnut Creek, CA; Stephen P. Reiss, Providence, RI; and Dr. Tamal Bose, Denver, CO have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Advanced Peripherals Technologies, Inc., Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa-ken, Japan has been dropped as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Salutation Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On March 30, 1995, Salutation Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 27, 1995 (60 FR 33233).                 

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 12, 1999. A notice has not yet been published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-10595  Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10577]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Technology Administration.
    Title: Licensing of Government-Owned Inventions.
    Agency Form Number: None.
    OMB Approval Number: None.
    Type of Request: Collection in use without OMB approval.
    Burden: 1,200 hours.
    Number of respondents: 400 Applicants.
    Avg. Hours Per Response: 2 hours for applications, 15 minutes for 
reports.
    Needs and Uses: The Bayh-Dole Act (Public Law 96-517) authorizes 
agencies to license their patented inventions to the public. In order 
to obtain a license, an application must be submitted to the agency 
owning the invention. The information provided (a marketing or 
development plan) is used by the government to negotiate the terms of 
the license and, when necessary, to choose between competing 
applications. Once awarded, the license holder must provide utilization 
reports. These are used by the government to ensure that the awardee is 
in compliance with the terms of the license.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit organizations, not-
for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion, annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5027, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 
10202, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20503.

    Dated: April 20, 2000.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information 
Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-10577 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-18-P
Exhibit 3

Account Ledger

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24153-3 Filed:05/05/23 Entered:05/05/23 17:40:04 Desc:

Exhibit 3 Page 1 of 12
Docket No: FAA-2015-0244 Dir ID: 2014-NM-127-AD
###### Editorial Note on Part 1251

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1251 appear at 81 FR 3709, Jan. 22, 2016.

#### §§ 1251.552-1251.559 [Reserved]
#### § 1266.101 Scope.

The provisions at § 1266.102 are intended to implement the cross-waiver requirement in Article 16 of the intergovernmental agreement entitled, “Agreement Among the Government of Canada, Governments of Member States of the European Space Agency, the Government of Japan, the Government of the Russian Federation, and the Government of the United States of America concerning Cooperation on the Civil International Space Station (IGA).” Article 16 establishes a cross-waiver of liability for use by the Partner States and their related entities and requires that this reciprocal waiver of claims be extended to contractually or otherwise-related entities of NASA by requiring those entities to make similar waivers of liability. Thus, NASA is required to include IGA-based cross-waivers in agreements for ISS activities that fall within the scope of “Protected Space Operations,” as defined in § 1266.102. The provisions of § 1266.102 provide the regulatory basis for cross-waiver clauses to be incorporated into NASA agreements for activities that implement the IGA and the memoranda of understanding between the United States and its respective international partners. The provisions of § 1266.104 provide the regulatory basis for cross-waiver clauses to be incorporated into NASA launch agreements for science or space exploration activities unrelated to the ISS.
NEWTON AVIATION 

Essential Air Service 

Subject: EAS service to Lewistown MT 

An unfortunate series of events have contributed to Lewistown's inability to maintain the minimum 

ridership qualification. With better decision making this could have been avoided but now is not the 

time to address that issue. Economic impact to our community is my greatest concern. 

The EAS subsidy can only be justified as a tool for community economic development. There will be 

direct impacts to us at Newton Aviation. We have provided many services including fuel, maintenance, 

and others to EAS airlines over the years we have been in business as an FBO on the Lewistown Airport. 

When I say impacts I mean JOBS. 

The community impacts are substantial knowing the importance of Air Commerce. Being isolated will 

certainly hurt these communities' long term prospects for growth. Motels, restaurants, car rentals, and 

airport funding will be very direct losses of hard dollars for business and jobs. 

From experience, we know that Lewistown can meet minimum standards for EAS funding. I hope you 

will give Lewistown that opportunity. 

Regards, 

Donald H Newton - Owner 

Lewistown Airport 

410 Skyline Drive 

Lewistown, MT 59457 

406-538-8150 -Qffice 

406-538-8166 -Fax 

406-366-7892 -cell 

newton@lewjstownairport.com 

Exxon Fuel 

100, Jet A 

Aircraft Maintenance 

Aerial Crop Spraying
# C_2016011EN.01000101.xml

| 14.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 January 2016

(2016/C 11/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0816 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,74 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4614 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,75020 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2460 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0926 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5588 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 315,43 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3458 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5300 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2626 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5413 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5381 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3922 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6519 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5492 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 301,18 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,8353 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1121 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6670 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 947,98 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7382 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,283 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 82,3098 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,203 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3214 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,2779 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,3212 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0816

JPY

Japanese yen

127,74

DKK

Danish krone

7,4614

GBP

Pound sterling

0,75020

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2460

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0926

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5588

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

315,43

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3458

RON

Romanian leu

4,5300

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2626

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5413

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5381

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3922

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6519

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5492

KRW

South Korean won

1 301,18

ZAR

South African rand

17,8353

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1121

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6670

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 947,98

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7382

PHP

Philippine peso

51,283

RUB

Russian rouble

82,3098

THB

Thai baht

39,203

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3214

MXN

Mexican peso

19,2779

INR

Indian rupee

72,3212

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
LTS Doc#:22600-2 Filed:10/12/22 Entered:10/13/22 1

Envelope Page 1 of 1
#### § 125.181 Induction system ice prevention.

A means for preventing the malfunctioning of each engine due to ice accumulation in the engine air induction system must be provided for each airplane.
§ 1253.535 Effect of state or local law or other requirements. ( a ) *Prohibitory requirements.* The obligation to comply with §§ 1253.500 through 1253.550 is not obviated or alleviated by the existence of any State or local law or other requirement that imposes prohibitions or limits upon employment of members of one sex that are not imposed upon members of the other sex.
( b ) *Benefits.* A recipient that provides any compensation, service, or benefit to members of one sex pursuant to a State or local law or other requirement shall provide the same compensation, service, or benefit to members of the other sex.
§ 1262.101 Purpose of these rules. ( a ) The pertinent provisions of the Equal Access to Justice Act at 5 U.S.C. 504 (hereinafter “the Act”) provide for the award of attorney fees and other expenses to eligible individuals and entities who are parties to certain administrative proceedings (called “adversary adjudications”). An eligible party may receive an award when it prevails, unless it has unreasonably protracted the proceedings, or the Agency's position in the proceeding was substantially justified, or special circumstances make an award unjust. The rules in this part describe the parties eligible for awards and the proceedings that are covered. They also explain how to apply for awards, and the procedures and standards that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) will use in determining awards.
( b ) As used in this part: ( 1 ) *Adversary adjudication* means: ( i ) An adjudication under 5 U.S.C. 554 in which the position of the United States is represented by counsel or otherwise, but excludes an adjudication for the purpose of establishing or fixing a rate or for the purpose of granting or renewing a license;
( ii ) Any appeal of a decision made pursuant to section 6 of the Contract Disputes Act (CDA) of 1978, as amended (41 U.S.C. 605) before an agency board of contract appeals as provided in section 8 of the CDA (41 U.S.C. 607);
( iii ) Any hearing conducted under Chapter 38 of Title 31 (added by section 6104 of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-509, 100 Stat. 1948, Oct. 21, 1986), 31 U.S.C. 3801, *et seq.,* as amended); and
( iv ) The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993 (added by section 4(b), of RFRA (Pub. L. 103-141, 107 Stat. 1489, Nov. 16, 1993), 42 U.S.C. 2000bb).
( 2 ) *Adjudicative officer* means the deciding official, without regard to whether the official is designated an administrative law judge, a hearing officer or examiner, or otherwise, who presided at the adversary adjudication;
( 3 ) *Position of the agency* means, in addition to the position taken by the agency in the adversary adjudication, the action or failure to act by the agency upon which the adversary adjudication is based;
( 4 ) *Party,* as defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(3), includes a person or agency named or admitted as a party, or properly seeking and entitled as of right to be admitted as a party, in an agency proceeding, and a person or agency admitted by an agency as a party for limited purposes, and who meets the eligibility requirements of § 1262.104; and
( 5 ) *Agency* with a capital A denotes the NASA.
( c ) Determination of *Substantially justified.* Whether or not the position of the agency was substantially justified shall be determined on the basis of the administrative record, as a whole, which is made in the adversary adjudication for which fees and other expenses are sought.
[51 FR 15311, Apr. 23, 1986, as amended at 60 FR 12668, Mar. 8, 1995]
#### § 125.353 Facilities and services.

During a flight, the pilot in command shall obtain any additional available information of meteorological conditions and irregularities of facilities and services that may affect the safety of the flight.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                               [EideBailly LOGO]
                           --------------------------
                            CPAs & BUSINESS ADVISORS


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
First Federal Banc of the Southwest, Inc.
Roswell, New Mexico


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-128308) on Form S-8 of First Federal Banc of the Southwest, Inc. of our
report dated December 22, 2006, relating to the consolidated statements of
financial condition of First Federal Banc of the Southwest, Inc. and subsidiary
as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of
income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years ended September 30,
2006 and 2005, which report appears in the September 30, 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of First Federal Banc of the Southwest, Inc.


/s/ Eide Bailly LLP

Bismarck, North Dakota
December 22, 2006






                       PEOPLE. PRINCIPLES. POSSIBILITIES.
                       ----------------------------------
                               www.eidebailly.com
  1050 E Interstate Ave o PO Box 1914 o Bismarck, North Dakota 58502-1914 o
                  Phone 701.255.1091 o Fax 701.224.1582 o EOE
§ 121.577 Stowage of food, beverage, and passenger service equipment during airplane movement on the surface, takeoff, and landing. ( a ) No certificate holder may move an airplane on the surface, take off, or land when any food, beverage, or tableware furnished by the certificate holder is located at any passenger seat.
( b ) No certificate holder may move an airplane on the surface, take off, or land unless each food and beverage tray and seat back tray table is secured in its stowed position.
( c ) No certificate holder may permit an airplane to move on the surface, take off, or land unless each passenger serving cart is secured in its stowed position.
( d ) No certificate holder may permit an airplane to move on the surface, take off, or land unless each movie screen that extends into an aisle is stowed.
( e ) Each passenger shall comply with instructions given by a crewmember with regard to compliance with this section.
[Doc. No. 26142, 57 FR 42674, Sept. 15, 1992]
#### PHEBE STEVENS, BY HER NEXT FRIEND, v. HANDLY.

Slander — identical words — substance—inuendo—words of explanation not declared on*

It is not necessary in slander to prove the *identical*words laid, proof of the *substance*is sufficient.

The office of an *inuendo*is, to apply the words; it cannot extend their meaning beyond tHeir ordinary acceptation.

Words uttered in connection with the slander, may be considered, in order to explain the sense in which the words declared upon were uttered,

Slander. This suit was brought in behalf of the daughter of the plaintiffs in the last suit, against the same defendant. The plaintiff counted upon the following words: ‘ Stevens keeps a whore house, and Phebe is a whore — Ida has gone to Stevens’, and Stevens keeps a damned whore house; and Debby and Phebe were not able to stand the three tanyard blackguards; and Stevens’ wife, and all the Delanys are whores.’ Plea not guilty, and issue.

The plaintiff proved by *Eliza Rittenhouse,*that the defendant said Stevens kept a damned whore house, and Phebe and Debby had taken on a new mode of making money by their arses. Phebe and Debby are not able to stand the three tanyard blackguards, and took Ida to stand John Lisle, and if it had not been for the fever sore on Phebe’s leg, she would have had the other leg broke long before this time.

By *David*Rittenhouse, the same thing.

By *Margaret Riggs,*that the defendant said Phebe Stevens and Debby Delany had got a great many fine things in a curious way, and kept blackguards’ company, &c.

By *Mary Qraham,*that he said if Phebe’s leg had not been sore, she would have had the other leg broke; and also, that they had taken Ida in to help Debby and Phebe stand the tanyard fellows.

It was also proven, on. cross-examination, that the defendant respected the plaintiff, whose character was good, and that he had named a child for her; that Ida was a servant of the defendant’s, and had left him and gone to Stevens’; and the defendant.was talking about her leaving him when he uttered the slander.

*124A motion was made for a non suit, because the words were *not*proved. The motion was overruled by the court.

*Bostwick*and Beebe, for the plaintiff, and

*Stokely*and *Goodenow,*for the defendant,

argued to jury.

Hitchcock, J.

to jury. If the words are proven, or so much of either set is proven, as imputes the crime of being a whore, the action is sustained. It is not necessary to prove the *identical*words; proof of the substance is sufficient. The inuendo is to give application to words; it cannot extend their meaning beyond their ordinary acceptation. Words not laid in the declaration, which were spoken at the same time with those charged, and explain their sense, may be considered, and will excuse the defendant if they show the other words to have been spoken in an innocent meaning.

Verdict for the plaintiff, *‡*163 50,. and judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             458
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,042
<INVENTORY>                                     46,432
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,641
<PP&E>                                          41,123
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,580
<BONDS>                                         38,517
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,847
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,898
<SALES>                                         59,058
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,184
<CGS>                                           52,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,930
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   684
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,104)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,901)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,203)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,203)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.93)


</TABLE>