alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Marc Corrigan [mailto:Marc.Corrigan@tn.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 3:02 PM

To: Boyd, Christopher

Cc: Dianna Smith; Lynorae Benjamin; Farngalo.Zuri@epa.gov; Kelly Sheckler

Subject: VMT for SIPs

Chris,

I received your voicemail asking about where it states that VMT used in a SIP to establish MVEBs must come from a 

TDFM. I seem to think I answered this question some time back, for someone, after having done some research.

Problem is, I can’t find my earlier response (our email purges after 90 days). I’m sure it was excellent, whatever it 

was. 

Basically, I think it comes down to latest planning assumptions. We have to use the best tools and data available.

We also have to undertake interagency consultation in the development of the SIP, including the VMT data. So, by 

default, the MPO would be the agency to provide that data.

I’m not sure what years you are considering in your question. Generally, actual HPMS data for historical years, 

where available, should be used for those years. So if you are establishing, let’s say, a base year 2011, that year 

should be available already. If you are looking at 2011, UT prepared some data that the MPO can look at to see if 

they think it is reasonable, but would generally be the preferred data since it is ‘measured’ data.

Otherwise, the best (most of the time) and most widely accepted data for VMT into the future comes from the 

TDFM. Remember, you are not just looking for VMT, but also speed, road type distribution, sourcetype 

population, etc. Many of these come from the TDFM as well, and are interrelated to the VMT.

So, I suspect I have not answered your question satisfactorily. What I propose we do is to convene an IAC call. It 

might be easier to have your proposed planning assumptions detailed in a pre-analysis consensus type of 

document. This way we can quickly go over the easy ones, and spend more time discussing the more difficult 

inputs. Also, this may get you some help if others have data readily available for your use.

I’ve copied a number of folks on this email so they can help me cite chapter and verse if there is one out there that 

I am not recalling.

I hope this helps!

Marc

________________________________

Marc Corrigan

Environmental Specialist

Mobile and Air Resources Management

Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation

Air Pollution Control Division

William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower

312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, 15th Floor

Nashvi le, TN 37243

E-Mail: Marc.Corrigan@tn.gov

Phone: (615) 532-0616

Fax: (615) 532-0596
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3486 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3486

   To create 4 new permanent judgeships for the eastern district of 
                              California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 2003

   Mr. Thomas (for himself, Mr. Nunes, Mr. Dooley of California, Mr. 
 Radanovich, Mr. Cardoza, Mr. Matsui, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Ose, and Mr. 
   Herger) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To create 4 new permanent judgeships for the eastern district of 
                              California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NEW JUDGESHIPS FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

    (a) New Appointments.--The President shall appoint, by and with the 
advice and consent of the Senate, 3 additional district judges for the 
eastern district of California.
    (b) Conversion of Temporary Judgeship.--The existing judgeship for 
the eastern district of California authorized by section 203(c) of the 
Judicial Improvements Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-650; 28 U.S.C. 133 
note), as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this 
Act, shall be a district judgeship for the eastern district of 
California, and the incumbent of such judgeship shall hold office under 
section 133 of title 28, United States Code, as amended by subsection 
(c) of this section.
    (c) Table.--In order that the table contained in section 133(a) of 
title 28, United States Code, reflects the total number of permanent 
district judgeships authorized by virtue of subsections (a) and (b) of 
this section, such table is amended by striking the item relating to 
California and inserting the following:

``California:
    Northern................................................        14 
    Eastern.................................................        10 
    Central.................................................        27 
    Southern................................................     13.''.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section, 
including such sums as may be necessary to provide appropriate space 
and facilities for the judicial positions created by this section.
                                 <all>
```
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 17, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-0411

Lower Tribunal No. F05-5530B

________________

Trevor Lyons,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge.

Trevor Lyons, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Marshall v. State, 421 So. 2d 714, 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 

1982).
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 366

To authorize former Federal employees who receive voluntary separation incentive payments under the Department of Agriculture program to accept 

subsequent employment with the Federal Government, without loss of 

their payments, when such employment is directly related to fighting 

forest fires. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2003

Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee 

on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To authorize former Federal employees who receive voluntary 

separation incentive payments under the Department of 

Agriculture program to accept subsequent employment 

with the Federal Government, without loss of their payments, when such employment is directly related to fighting forest fires.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 366 IH 

1 SECTION 1. REEMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR RECIPI2 ENTS OF VOLUNTARY SEPARATION INCEN3 TIVE PAYMENTS UNDER DEPARTMENT OF 

4 AGRICULTURE PROGRAM. 

5 Section 735(e) of the Agriculture, Rural Develop6 ment, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agen7 cies Appropriations Act, 1997 (Public Law 104–180; 110 

8 Stat. 1604; 5 U.S.C. 5597 note), is amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘An individual’’ and inserting 

10 the following: 

11 ‘‘(1) FORFEITURE OF INCENTIVE PAYMENT.—

12 An individual’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

14 paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The forfeiture requirement 

16 in paragraph (1) shall not apply if the subsequent 

17 employment or personal services contract is directly 

18 related to fighting forest fires.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**
I, Steven A. Odom, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of VersoTechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to my knowledge:
1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedMarch 31, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.
Dated: May 10, 2004    /s/ Steven A. Odom
###### Editorial Note on Part 747

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 747.30 Partial summary disposition.

If the ALJ determines that a party is entitled to summary disposition as to certain claims only, the ALJ will defer submitting a recommended decision as to those claims. A hearing on the remaining issues must be ordered. Those claims for which the ALJ has determined that summary disposition is warranted will be addressed in the recommended decision filed at the conclusion of the hearing.
ROE R10E RITE RI2E R4E RI5E RIGE RITE RIBE
/ . i
1
Steethead Falls ®
re} ° 7
a = Op
Smith “NK 2 @ 7
Jefferson County (J Rock | _ Jefferson Coun
Deschutes Cor =
Deschutes County| . ae Crook County
. a
. ‘ OKED,
Ter rebonn CROC aS
Ye
Bones 6
t ‘Ochoco
eo Sisters ond : Reservoir
a?
7 oO
Powell o a
Tumalo a Butte
20 RNA/
ACEC
1 vz)
Tumalo] 4
— rinevill
. L! eservoi
- Uy
a
. r
|_| . oO
a
ye : =
—|
| Horse Ridge 7
1
Horse Ridge _ Crook |County _ |
RNA/ Deschutes | County
ACEC
20
Brothers
East
Paulina :
Lake Q O Lake
~—
Wickiup
Reservoir
La Pine °
; Gos r 3
Deschutes a ee 3o 7
‘La Pine zl, 8
212
O18
2/9
2
97) z\4
Sia
x

Legend

—— Planning Area

Highway

Road

[|] Urban Growth Boundary
Motorized Seasonal Use Periods

[=] Closed From December 1st to
March 31st

[=] Closed From December 1st to
April 30th

Fx] Closed From December 1st to
July 31st

Recreation Travel Access
Limited to Type of Vehicles

Limited to Designated Roads
Only Year Round

Limited to Designated Roads
and Trails Year Round

Limited to Designated Roads
Seasonally

Limited to Designated Roads
and Trails Seasonally

Closed Year Round

POO

\

LA

Prineville
District

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
PRINEVILLE DISTRICT
2005

N

Ww. E

Ss
5
—————
MILES

5 oO 5 10

KILOMETERS

RMP Map 3: Travel Management Designations and
Seasonal Use Periods

Upper Deschutes
Resource Management Plan

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use

with other data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product

was developed through digital means and may be updated without notification.
1MOS-04-02:MW:082605
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Innodata Isogen, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Jack Abuhoff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      Jack AbuhoffJack
      AbuhoffChairman
      of the Board,Chief
      Executive Officer and PresidentMarch
      11, 2009
### SERVED: May 12,2015

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF STARJET, INC. DocketNo. FAA-2014- 1115 

## ORDER VACATING SHOW CAUSE AND AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER :· :.--**:~** ·-· ·- ,....r • t •.•: • ; \. .,-

. ·:"**~~,·** ·, :.T :· .. i

. :·

-, -I '1._ •**~-** '* t \1, ,_., • :·

On February 19, 2015, we issued our Procedural Order settingcompliance for June 1,.2015. On March 17.2015, the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA") filed a Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted. We issued an Order to Show Cause on April 27, 2015. On March 26, 2015,**Sta~jet,** Inc. (hereinafter "Starjet") filed its Answer which was not in the file. We will vacate our Orderto Show Cause and extend times to comply with our Procedural Order. Paragraphs.#2 and #3 ofthe Procedural Order are amended as follows: WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following procedural schedule:. 

### 1. Our Orderto Show Cause dated April 27, 2015, 

### be and is hereby VACATED: and 2. On orbefore July 1, 2015,the parties shall conclude all discovery including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production requests and/or interrogatories. Ifthe parties cann<;>t resolve a·discovery dispute they shall submitthe dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; and3. The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on orafter 

### .Iuly I, '2015, subject to the availability ofcourtroom facilities. The specific date and time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order.

Richard 

### C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List



### 2SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI000 1 ONE COPY Pekka Karu. President/DirectorofOperations**Sta~jet,** Inc..**Re.~pondent** 26 Washington Blvd., 211

# ° Floor Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 TEL: 310-301-9325 FAX: 310-301-1556 Lisa J. Toscano, 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7 Federal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region P. 

### 0. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7110 FAX: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### Administrative Law.Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New JerseY.Avenue. S.E. (Eil-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 Docket No. FAA-2014-1115 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration. 600 Independence Avenue. S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO. Washington. DC 20591: Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430
..3
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1089 PLATE 7

PALMER: ~~
Tikes

EXPLANATION

QUATERNARY

TERE]

EX UsA

Graywacke including a few thin beds
of conglomerate and black shale

Upper Cretaceous
CRETACEOUS,

Lithologie types in the
Matanuska formation

Black shale including a few thin beds
of graywacke

Covered area probably underlain
largely by black shale

Covered area probably underlain by
interbedded graywacke and black shale

ee
Very small exposure of black shale
x
Very small exposure of graywacke
— ———"
Inferred contact

‘TRUE NORTH

nys nun? DW

APPROXIMATE. MEAN
DECLINATION, 1958

Limit of outcrop
y
od
, a

Fault, showing dip and relative movement
Dashed where approrimately located;
dotted where concealed

20,

Vertical fault

eee

eat

Probable fault

ee
Strike and dip of beds
Semple 8
Sample locality
a
Claim marker

SECTION ALONG LINE A.A"

TWTERIOR—GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON, 0.6 MR ONBT,

eases GEOLOGIC MAP AND SECTION OF HAYDITE RAW-MATERIAL
sop yale (BLACK- SHALE) AREA ALONG KINGS RIVER, ALASKA

400 0 400 800 Feet
L 1 1 4

Contour interval 50 feet
Datum is mean sea level
(LOGO)
700 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Telephone 713 319 2000
Fax 713 319 2041


                          Independent Auditors' Report

The Board of Directors
Mellon Mortgage Company:

We have examined  management's  assertion about Mellon  Mortgage  Company's (the
Company)  compliance  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  set  forth in the
Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of America's  (MBA) Uniform  Single  Attestation
Program for Mortgage  Bankers,  as of and for the year ended  December 31, 1998,
included in the accompanying  Management  Assertion  (Residential  Mortgage Loan
Servicing).  Management is responsible  for the Company's  compliance with those
minimum  servicing  standards.  Our  responsibility  is to express an opinion on
management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Mellon Mortgage Company has complied
in all material respects with the  aforementioned  minimum servicing  standards,
except minimum  servicing  standard I.1.  related to ensuring that all custodial
and clearing  accounts are reconciled on a monthly basis and  reconciling  items
are cleared in a timely manner in the Denver Servicing center, as of and for the
year ended December 31, 1998, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

KPMG LLP

January 22, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10051]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Office of the Secretary; Submission for OMB Review; Comment 
Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Form Number, and OMB Number: DoD Educational Loan Repayment 
Program (LRP); DD Form 2475; OMB Number 0704-0152.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 27,000.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 27,000.
    Average Burden Per Response: 10 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 4,500.
    Needs and Uses: Title 10 USC 2171, 16301, and 16302 authorize the 
Military Services to repay Federal student loans for individuals who 
meet certain criteria and who enlist for active military service or 
enter the Selected Reserves for a specified obligation period. 
Legislation requires that the Services verify the status of the loan 
prior to payment. The DD Form 2475, DoD Educational Loan Repayment 
Program (LRP) Annual Application, collects the necessary verification 
data from lending institutions.
    Affected Public: Business or Other For-Profit.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: April 18, 2000.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-10051 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
### HOME ABOUT US NEWS PUBLICATIONS 

# PIFSC Staff Publications

Recent PIFSC Publications

 View Most Recent Publications from PIFSC  Subscribe to RSS Feed 

## View by Research Division

 Coral Reef Ecosystems  Ecosystems and Oceanography  Fisheries Biology and Stock Assessment  Fisheries Monitoring  Protected Species  Socioeconomics 

## View by Document Type Advanced Search Search Tips Word or Phrase AND Author AND Title AND Series Title AND Journal Title 

## Limit by Year Earliest Current SEARCH RESET

Alphabetical | Chronological PIFSC, SWFSC Administrative Reports Alphabetical | Chronological PIFSC, SWFSC Technical Memoranda and Reports Alphabetical | Chronological PIFSC Data Reports LIBRARY MENU Library Home Library Catalog Databases Journals & Serials Staff Publications Contact Us 

### Page 1 of2 NOAA PIFSC
-PIFSC Staff Publications

3/7/2011 http://www.pifsc.noaa.gov/library/publication_search.phpAlphabetical | Chronological PIFSC Working Papers Alphabetical | Chronological Books and Book Chapters Alphabetical | Chronological Conference Proceedings Alphabetical | Chronological Journal Articles Alphabetical | Chronological Reports Alphabetical | Chronological Theses

Chronological PIFSC, SWFSC Cruise Reports

For questions or comments, email the Librarian Library | Outreach | Partners | Contact Us | Employment | Facilities Organization Chart | Site Map | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Information Quality

NMFS | NOAA | U.S. Department of Commerce | USA.gov 

### http://www.pifsc.noaa.gov Last updated February 01 2011 

### Page2of2 NOAA PIFSC
-PIFSC Staff Publications

3/7/2011 http://www.pifsc.noaa.gov/library/publication_search.php
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS RAMIREZ-GREGORIO,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 15-71250

Agency No. A205-648-301

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2016**

Before: HAWKINS, N.R. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

We grant Respondent’s unopposed motion to expedite this appeal, and deny 

her motion to lift the stay (Docket Entry No. 26). Luis Ramirez-Gregorio, a native 

and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ 

order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 21 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-71250

application for asylum. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

review de novo questions of law, and for substantial evidence the agency’s factual 

findings. Husyev v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir. 2008). We dismiss in 

part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Ramirez-Gregorio’s contention that he 

established extraordinary circumstances excusing the delay in filing his asylum 

application based on legal disability and applications for other immigration 

benefits because he did not raise this contention before the BIA. See Barron v. 

Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to review 

claims not presented to the agency).

Apart from his contention regarding extraordinary circumstances, RamirezGregorio does not challenge the BIA’s finding that he did not establish changed 

circumstances excusing his untimely asylum application. See Lopez-Vasquez v. 

Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-1080 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised 

and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). Thus, we deny the petition for 

review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.