alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Group Wage Creditors in the Litigation Captioned 

Prudencio Acevedo Arocho et al. v. Puerto Rico 

Department of Treasury, Case No. KAC-2005-5022

Claimants – Appellants

v.

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE 

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE 

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEE’S 

RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE 

GOVERNMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH 

OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL 

OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD 

FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE 

FOR THE PUERTO RICO HIGHWAYS AND 

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Appellees

 

 PROMESA

 Title III

 Case No. 17-bk-03283

 (Jointly Administered)

NOTICE OF APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Notice is hereby given that the Group Wage Creditors in the Litigation Captioned Prudencio 

Acevedo Arocho et al. v. Puerto Rico Department of Treasury, Case No. KAC-2005-5022, hereby 

appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit the “Order Denying Motion 

Requesting Allowance and Payment of Administrative Expense Claims Filed by Wage 

Claimants” (See, Exhibit A)entered in the above-captioned case on November 3, 2022 at Docket 

No. 22799 denying the Application for Allowance of Payment of Postpetition Administrative 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23152 Filed:12/22/22 Entered:12/22/22 16:50:34 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

Expense Priority Claims, Filed by Group in the Litigation Captioned Acevedo Arocho et al. v. the 

Departamento Hacienda and Reservation of Rights (Docket Entry No. 21230 in Case No. 17-

3283).

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this date I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using 

the CM/ECF system which electronically mails notice to the attorneys of record. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico this 22nd of December 2022.

THE BATISTA LAW GROUP, PSC. 

S/ Jesus E. Batista Sánchez

Jesus E. Batista Sánchez, Esq.

Attorney for the Appellants

USDC-PR No. 227014

P.O. Box 191059

San Juan, PR. 00919

Telephone: (787) 620-2856

Facsimile: (787) 777-1589

E-mail: jeb@batistasanchez.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23152 Filed:12/22/22 Entered:12/22/22 16:50:34 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18 - 7287

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DAREN KAREEM GADSDEN, a/k/a D , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Catherine C. Blake , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cr - 00302

- CCB

- 3 )

Submitted : January 17, 2019 Decided: January 23, 2019

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Daren Kareem Gadsden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Daren Kareem Gadsden appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as successive and unauthorized , as well as its order summarily denying his self

- styled motions to correct sentencing errors and for just ice

. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gadsden’s informal brief does not challenge the district court’s holding that his § 2255 motion was successive and unauthorized , Gadsden has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order dismissing the motion

. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc. , 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). We thus affirm the court’s order dismissing Gadsden’s § 2255 motion. See United States v. Gadsden , No. 1:11

- cr - 00302

- CCB

- 3 ( D. Md. Oct. 4, 2018 ). As to the order denying Gadsden’s secondary motion s, the record establishes that these likewise were successive and unauthorized habeas motions, which the district court should have dismissed for lack of j urisdiction . W e may , however, affirm the court’s order “on any grounds apparent from the record [,] ” United States v. Riley , 856 F.3d 326, 328 (4th Cir.) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied , 138 S. Ct. 273 (2017) , and this disposition is emin ently supported by the record

. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s secondary order , as well

. See Gadsden , No. 1:11

- cr - 00302

- CCB

- 3 ( D. Md. filed Oct

. 4, 2018 & entered Oct. 5, 2018 ). We deny Gadsden’s motion for a transcript at government expense
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
ex10-1.cnv<PAGE>

                   AMENDMENT TO O'REILLY CONSULTING AGREEMENT

     THIS AGREEMENT is made this 30th day of April 1999, among Eltrax Systems,
Inc. (the "Company"), Montana Corporation (the "Consulting Firm"), and William
P. O'Reilly (the "Consultant"), with reference to the following facts:

A.   The Consultant, the Consulting Firm, and the Company are parties to a
certain O'Reilly Consulting Agreement, dated as of April 1, 1999 (the "Original
Agreement"); and

B.   The parties wish to amend the Original Agreement, only in the ways set
forth below.

The Company, the Consultant Firm, and the Consultant agree that the Original
Agreement is hereby amended, only as set forth below:

2.   Paragraph 3 of the Original Agreement shall be replaced by the following
     paragraph:

     The term of this Agreement will commence on April 1, 1999, and will
     continue for a period of two (2) years, unless earlier terminated in
     accordance with Section 4 below. The term of this Agreement will
     automatically renew for additional one-year terms unless written notice of
     election to not renew is given by either party to the other at least one
     year before the end of the term.

1.   Notwithstanding paragraph 5(a) of the Original Agreement, the consulting
     fees will be reduced by $5000 per month for May through September 1999, and
     thereafter will be paid at the rate set forth in paragraph 5(a).

ELTRAX SYSTEMS, INC.

     /s/ Nicholas J. Pyett
---------------------------
By:      Nicholas J. Pyett,
         Chief Financial Officer

Montana Corporation
     /s/ William P. O'Reilly
----------------------------
By:      William P. O'Reilly
         President

CONSULTANT

/s/ William P. O'Reilly
--------------------------
    William P. O'Reilly
[ARTICLE] 7
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1998
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1999
[CASH]                                       3,535,533
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                2,943,422
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                             7,410,082
[PP&E]                                       2,669,892
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                              10,595,508
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                        2,660,981
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                        45,852
[OTHER-SE]                                           0
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                10,595,508
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                            19,593,353
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                               17,675,673
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                              77,594
[INCOME-PRETAX]                              1,917,680
[INCOME-TAX]                                 (332,000)
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                                  0
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                 2,249,680
[EPS-BASIC]                                      .45
[EPS-DILUTED]                                      .40
</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 124/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 124 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 649 April 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 124

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 649 April 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2021/C 124/01 | Position (EU) No 3/2021 of the council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Digital Europe Programme and repealing Decision (EU) 2015/2240Adopted by the Council on 16 March 2021 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 124/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 3/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Digital Europe Programme and repealing Decision (EU) 2015/2240 | 35 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2021/C 124/01

Position (EU) No 3/2021 of the council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Digital Europe Programme and repealing Decision (EU) 2015/2240Adopted by the Council on 16 March 2021 (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 124/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 3/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Digital Europe Programme and repealing Decision (EU) 2015/2240

35

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Frazier *v.*The State.

*Murder.*

(Decided February 10, 1914.

64 South. 653.)

*Jury; Summoniny; Statutory Provision.*— The provisions of section 32, Acts 1909, p. 315, relating to summoning and empaneling jurors for the trial of capital felonies, are mandatory and where the record in a case of murder in the first degree fails to show a compliance with such section, a judgment of conviction following thereon will be reversed.

Appeal from Coffee Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

Man Frazier was convicted of murder in the second degree and he appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

R. H. Arrington, and M. A. Owens, for appellant.

The record fails to show any order for a special venire to try the defendant charged with a capital felony.— Sec. 32, Acts 1909, p. 315. The provisions of this section are mandatory, and upon a failure of. the record to set out the proper orders, the judgment will be re*66
      *versed.*— Jackson *v. tétate,*171 Ala. 38; *Welsh v. tétale,*1 Ala. App. 111.

R. O. Rriokell, Attorney General, and T. H. Seay, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Error is confessed because of a failure of the record to show the necessary-orders for summoning a special jury to try the capital felony charged.

WALKER, P. J.

The indictment in this case was

for murder in the first degree. The record does not show that any attempt was made by the court to comply with the requirements of section 32 of the present jury law (Acts of Ala. Sp. Sess. 1909, pp. 305, 318) applicable to the case of a person indicted for a capital felony. The record shows that the defendant ivas arraigned, that he pleaded not guilty, and was tried, convicted, and sentenced, all on the same day. The provisions referred to are mandatory, and the failure of the record on an appeal from a judgment of conviction in such a case to show a compliance with them requires a reversal of the *judgment.*— Jackson *v. State,*171 Ala. 38, 55 South. 118; *Welch v. State,*1 Ala. App. 144, 56 South. 11.

Reversed and remanded.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Compilation of maritime laws [electronicresource].
 
1997
2002 | 2003 | 2004| 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008
 
SuDoc Number:TD 11.6/2:
CGP System Number:000608148
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
July 25, 2017********
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF INTEREP
NATIONAL RADIO SALES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           23216
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    38876
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1584
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 92819
<PP&E>                                           21803
<DEPRECIATION>                                   16663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  160109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            36149
<BONDS>                                         100000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      (6625)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    160109
<SALES>                                          17511
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 20016
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    26747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2382
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9113)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3736)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5377)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5377)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Order entered September 25, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00925
- CV HMS HOLDINGS CORP., HEALTH MANAGEMENT SY STEMS, INC., AND HMS

BUSINESS SERVICES, I NC., Appellant s

V. PUBLIC CONSULTING GR OUP, INC., JAMES G AMBINO, AND JASON RA MOS, Appellee s On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 14
- 09047



### O RDER
We GRANT appellee Public Consulting Group, Inc.’s September 24, 2015 unopposed motion to supplement the clerk ’s record and ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, no later than October 2, 2015, a supplemental clerk’s record containing the documents listed in the motion, which is attached

. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this o rder to Ms. Pitre and counsel for all parties.
/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3682

To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify certain Buy America 

provisions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2003

Ms. KILPATRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify certain 

Buy America provisions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Protecting American Man5 ufacturing Jobs Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BUY AMERICA. 

7 (a) WAIVERS.—Section 5323(j) of title 49, United 

8 States Code, is amended—

9 (1) by adding at the end of paragraph (1) the 

10 following: ‘‘The term ‘manufactured goods’ as used 
2

•HR 3682 IH 

1 in this paragraph means each individual item speci2 fied in each line item of a procurement. If the indi3 vidual items to be procured are listed in the bill of 

4 materials and specifications rather than a line item, 

5 the term ‘manufactured goods’ shall apply to each 

6 such item. The term ‘manufactured goods’ shall not 

7 be applicable to the procurement of rolling stock as 

8 set forth in paragraph (2)(C).’’; 

9 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through 

10 (7) as paragraphs (5) through (9), respectively; 

11 (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol12 lowing: 

13 ‘‘(3) When issuing a waiver based upon a public in14 terest determination under paragraph (2)(A), the Sec15 retary shall produce a detailed written justification as to 

16 why the waiver is in the public interest. The Secretary 

17 shall publish such justification in the Federal Register and 

18 provide the public a reasonable period for notice and com19 ment. 

20 ‘‘(4) The Secretary may not grant a waiver under 

21 paragraph (2) for microcomputer equipment. For pur22 poses of this paragraph ‘microprocessor’ means a com23 puter processor on a microchip.’’; and 

24 (4) by adding at the end the following: 
3

•HR 3682 IH 

1 ‘‘(10) ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW.—A party ad2 versely affected by an agency action under this sub3 section shall have the right to seek review under sec4 tion 702, title 5, United States Code.’’. 

5 (b) APPLICATION TO EXISTING WAIVERS.—Notwith6 standing the amendments made by this section, such 

7 amendments shall not modify the scope or terms of an 

8 existing waiver granted by the Secretary of Transportation 

9 that pertains to microprocessors or microcomputers, in10 cluding software, incorporated in train control equipment 

11 or communication equipment, as such terms are defined 

12 in 49 CFR 661.11 (t) and (u).

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10 u

                                PROMISSORY NOTE.
                                  MAY 14, 1999
                                 US $300,000.00

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Global Election Systems, Inc. (the "Debtor"), of 1611
Wilmeth Road, McKinney, Texas, U.S.A., 75069, hereby promises to pay to the
order of Howard T. Van Pelt (the "Creditor") on or before August 11, 1999, the
principal sum of US $300,000.00 together with interest thereon at the rate of 10
% per annum calculated and payable on the last day of each month. This
Promissory Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without notice or
bonus.

The Debtor hereby waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of
dishonour.

This Promissory Note is not assignable.

GLOBAL ELECTION SYSTEMS, INC.

Signed: "Howard T. Van Pelt"


--------------------------------
HOWARD T. VAN PELT
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C. , 20460



### MEMORAND UM OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY ANO POLLUTION PREVENTION



### PC Code: 124871 DP Barcode: 427618 SUBJECT: Review of Public Respon se to Spirodiclofen Problem Formulation in the Registration Review Preliminary Work Plan F ROM:

# ~~y Liu, PhD , Che mist 

# -r;, v.-L t-- in Housenger, Biologist 

# Cllt) w 1 V

### ~ Environmental Ri sk Branch 5


### THRU: Environmental Fat e and Effects Division

### (7**507P)** - 

## D 

# 7/ I 

## ojl 5
)

### ('VVVv~ Mah Shamim , PhD , Branch C hief

-- Environmental Risk Branch 5 Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507 P ) 

### TO: Jolene Trujillo , Chemical Rev i ew Manager Jill Bloom , Team Leader Risk Management and Impl e men tation Branch 5 Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508 P)
EFED Sp irodiclofen team has revi ewed comments received from Bayer CropScience on the Registration Review Pre liminary Work Plan for Sp iro diclofen. The team has responded below to the ind ividual commen ts that are related to the problem formu lation for the eco lo g ical risk assessment and drinking water exposure assessment in the Preliminary Work Plan. 

### Ba yer Co mm ent 1: Bayer indicated that there is one SLN registration (NY- 1 40006) that was not included in the P re liminary Work Plan 

### EFED Re s ponse: EFED will include th is 

### SLN (NY- 1 40006) in the registration review. However , since this SLN on ly includes a restricted use statement on pome fruit in NY, it will not affect the ecological and fate risk assessment. 

### Bayer Co mm ent 2: Instead of u si ng the total residues of parent and the degradation products (BAJ 2740-e nol , BAJ 2740-ketohydroxy , and BAJ 2740

- dihydroxy) and th e Koc of the least sorbing degradation product (BAJ 27 40- eno l) to calculate EECs in the drinking water exposure assessment , Bayer th inks that the exposure can be refined by using individual concentrations of the parent or m etabolites and the corresponding Koc.

### EFE D Respon se : EFED has been developing the guidance for calcu lating th e fo rm ation/decli ne constants for mode ling toxic residues of pest icides in the e nvironment. Once thi s g uidan ce is finalized, EF ED sho uld be able to better est im ate and refine the potential expos ur e in the drinking wate r assess ment. 

### Baye r Comment 3: Ba yer indicated that the following study will be submitted to the Agency. Sc hur , A. 2002. Assessme nt of side effects of B AJ 2740 SC 240 on the hone y bee (Ap i s me lli fera L.) 

### in the semi

- fie ld
. Bayer unpubli s he d report M-03 3472-0 1

- 1. 11 2 pages. 

### EFED Respon se: EFED acknow led ges it. Thi s s tud y cou ld be used to fu lfill part of t he ecological data gaps stated in the prob le m fo rmul ation.