alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Truett *v.*The State.

*Larceny.*

(Decided February 5, 1914.

64 South. 529.)

*Criminal Law; Corpus Delicti; Proof.*— It is not necessary that proof of the corpus delicti be shown by positive direct evidence; it is sufficiently shown by facts and circumstances from which the jury majr legally infer that the offense has been committed.

Appeal from Pike Law Court.

Heard before Hon. T. L. Boiujm.

Mitchell Truett was convicted of petit larceny, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

The witness Alex Johnson testified: ' That certain articles of jewelry were taken from his house about December 26, 1911, among them a gold shirt button, valued at abot $2. (This button was introduced and identified by witness as his.) That, at the time he missed the box with the jewelry in it, he and one Chancellor went out to look for tracks, and found a shoe track in the soft ground approaching the house, and traced it un•til it got to the yard, where it could not be further traced; and that on the other side of the yard leading from the house a barefoot track went through the soft ground to a point where it looked as if some one had sat down, and from there on the track was that of one wearing shoes. The witness also testified that he measured and compared the tracks, and that they were the same; that he did not follow the tracks, but left Mr. Chancel*109lor. There was other evidence tending to show the giving of the button by defendant, Truett, to another as security in a crap game, and it was finally returned to Mr. Johnson.

No counsel marked for appellant.

E. O. Brickell, Attorney General, for the State.

PELHAM, J.

The defendant was convicted of petit larceny. The article stolen was a gold shirt button of the value of $2, the property of one Alex Johnson.

No exception is shown by the bill of exceptions to have been reserved, except to the action of the court in refusing to grant the defendant’s motion to exclude the evidence, and discharge the defendant, on the ground that the corpus delicti had not been proven. It is not indispensable to the proof of the corpus delicti that it should be proven by positive direct evidence. It may be proven by facts and circumstances from which the jury might legally infer that the offense has been committed. *.*— Ryan *v. State,*100 Ala. 94, 15 South. 868. The testimony of Johnson afforded ample evidence from which the jury could legally infer that the offense charged had been committed in the present case. The evidence of the commission of the offense, and the defendant’s guilty connection thereAvith, was sufficient to submit the case to the jury, and the court properly refused the general charge requested by the defendant.

No error is shoAvn, and the judgment of the trial court Avill be affirmed.

Affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 748
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 748 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 748.2 Procedures for monitoring Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) compliance. ( a ) *Purpose.* This section is issued to ensure that all federally insured credit unions establish and maintain procedures reasonably designed to assure and monitor compliance with the requirements of subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code, the Financial Recordkeeping and Reporting of Currency and Foreign Transactions Act, and the implementing regulations promulgated under it by the Department of Treasury, 31 CFR chapter X.
( b ) *Establishment of a BSA compliance program* — ( 1 ) *Program requirement.* Each federally insured credit union shall develop and provide for the continued administration of a program reasonably designed to assure and monitor compliance with the recordkeeping and recording requirements in subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code and implementing regulations issued by the Department of Treasury at 31 CFR chapter X. The compliance program must be written, approved by the credit union's board of directors, and reflected in the credit union's minutes.
( 2 ) *Customer identification program.* Each federally insured credit union is subject to the requirements of 31 U.S.C. 5318(l) and the implementing regulation jointly promulgated by the NCUA and Department of the Treasury at 31 CFR 1020.220, which require a customer identification program to be implemented as part of the BSA compliance program required under this section.
( c ) *Contents of compliance program.* Such compliance program shall at a minimum— ( 1 ) Provide for a system of internal controls to assure ongoing compliance;
( 2 ) Provide for independent testing for compliance to be conducted by credit union personnel or outside parties;
( 3 ) Designate an individual responsible for coordinating and monitoring day-to-day compliance; and
( 4 ) Provide training for appropriate personnel.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3133-0094) [52 FR 2861, Jan. 27, 1987, as amended at 52 FR 8062, Mar. 16, 1987; 68 FR 25112, May 9, 2003; 76 FR 18366, Apr. 4, 2011]
# C_2023107EN.01006501.xml

| 23.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/65

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2023/C 107/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 21 November 2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 89540 |
| Decision No | 205/22/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Temporary Crisis Framework - Grant scheme due to an exceptionally severe increase in electricity prices |
| Legal basis | Parliamentary Decision authorising the measure and its budget, as set out in Innst. 34 S (2022–2023), and the regulation on its administration to be adopted by the Ministry of Climate and Environment |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Support businesses in adapting to higher energy costs and to stimulate them to invest in energy saving and energy production |
| Form of aid | Grants |
| Budget | NOK 2.8 billion |
| Intensity | Up to 50 % |
| Duration | 1 October 2022 – 31 December 2022 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors except for the petroleum extraction industry and undertakings performing activities falling under SN 2007 codes 35.1 and 35.3 |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Enova SF |
| Postal address: Postboks 5700 Torgarden |
| N-7437 Trondheim |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

21 November 2022

Case No

89540

Decision No

205/22/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Temporary Crisis Framework - Grant scheme due to an exceptionally severe increase in electricity prices

Legal basis

Parliamentary Decision authorising the measure and its budget, as set out in Innst. 34 S (2022–2023), and the regulation on its administration to be adopted by the Ministry of Climate and Environment

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Support businesses in adapting to higher energy costs and to stimulate them to invest in energy saving and energy production

Form of aid

Grants

Budget

NOK 2.8 billion

Intensity

Up to 50 %

Duration

1 October 2022 – 31 December 2022

Economic sectors

All sectors except for the petroleum extraction industry and undertakings performing activities falling under SN 2007 codes 35.1 and 35.3

Name and address of the granting authority

Enova SF

Postal address: Postboks 5700 Torgarden

N-7437 Trondheim

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/.

---
#### § 107.36 Carriage of hazardous material.

A small unmanned aircraft may not carry hazardous material. For purposes of this section, the term hazardous material is defined in 49 CFR 171.8.
§ 1245.203 Incomplete notice of infringement. ( a ) If a communication alleging patent infringement or copyright infringement is received that does not meet the requirements set forth in § 1245.202(a), the sender shall be advised in writing by the Agency Counsel for Intellectual Property: ( 1 ) That the claim for infringement has not been satisfactorily presented; and
( 2 ) Of the elements necessary to establish a claim.
( b ) A communication, in which no infringement is alleged in accordance with § 1245.202(a), such as a mere proffer of a license, shall not be considered a claim for infringement.
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 21
                                   ----------

                                  Subsidiaries


People's Choice TV of Tucson, Inc.

People's Choice TV of Houston, Inc.

People's Choice TV of St. Louis, Inc.

People's Choice TV of Phoenix, Inc.

Wireless Cable of Indianapolis, Inc.

People's Choice TV of Detroit, Inc.

People's Choice TV of Salt Lake City, Inc.

PCTV Gold, Inc.

Specchio Developers Investment Corp.

Arc Communications Services, Inc.

MicroFlex Corporation

Wireless Developers, Inc.

Preferred Entertainment, Inc.

Broadcast Cable, Inc.

People's Choice TV of Albuquerque, Inc.

Sat-Tel Services, Inc.

People's Choice TV of Milwaukee, Inc.

PCTV West, Inc.

PCTV North, Inc.

PCTV South, Inc.

PCTV Mid-West, Inc.

Waverunner, Inc.


                                      53
#### ALBRIGHT V. THE STATE.

(Decided November 27, 1913.)

Appeal from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. William E. Fort.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11



ASKYS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage enterprise)

Statement Regarding Computation of Net Loss Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
========================================================================

                                              Year ended December 31,
                                           -----------------------------
                                               1997             1996
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                        <C>               <C>
Net loss                                   $(13,506,602)     (7,819,037)
========================================================================

Weighted average shares used
  to compute net loss per share:
    Weighted average common
      shares outstanding*                    13,791,236      12,239,554
    Additional shares pursuant
      to SAB83 computation                          -            82,164
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                             13,791,236      12,441,718
========================================================================

Net loss per share                          $     (0.98)          (0.63)
========================================================================
</TABLE>

   * 1996 amount includes conversion of preferred shares.
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_____________________ _____ 09
- 16
- 00408
- CR

__________________________

_________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 9th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 15
- 07
- 07300
- CR

_________________________________________________________________ O RDER The clerk’s record in the above styled and numbered cause was filed December 19, 2016, and the r eporter’s record was filed November 15, 2016. On January 24 , 2017, the appellant’s court

- appointed attorney, Robert Bartlett , was notified that neither the brief of the appellant nor a motion for extension of time to file the brief has been filed. Althou gh the brief of the appellant was due to be filed January 18 , 2017, the brief has not been filed. We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing at which a representative of the State, counsel for the appellant, and the
ap pellant shall be present in person. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). If the appellant is not incarcerated, but fails to appear at the hearing after having been JOSHUA THOMAS MARRA

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS2

notified to do so, or after reasonable attempts to notify him have been made, then the trial co urt may enter a finding that appellant no longer desires to pursue the appeal and send said finding to this Court. See Tex. R. App. P

. 38.8(b)(4). If the appellant is present for the hearing, we direct the trial court to determine whether or not appella nt desires to pursue his appeal. If appellant desires to pursue his appeal, we direct the trial court to determine why the brief of the appellant has not been filed, why appellant’s counsel has not responded to late notices from this Court, and whether go od cause exists for appointed counsel, Robert Bartlett , to be relieved of his duties as appellate counsel and replaced by substitute counsel. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.04(j)(2) (West Supp. 201 6 ). If the trial court determines that good cause exists to relieve appointed counsel of his duties, we direct the trial court to appoint substitute counsel. The record of the hearing, including any orders and findings of the trial court judge, shall be sent to the appellate court for filing. The court reporter’s record of the hearing and the clerk’s record containing the recommendations of the trial court judge are to be filed on or before Tuesday, March 14, 2017. ORDER ENTERED February 14, 2017. PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF INTEREP
NATIONAL RADIO SALES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          26,766
<SECURITIES>                                     9,800
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,041
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,198
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,492
<PP&E>                                          24,134
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,876
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 215,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,301
<BONDS>                                         99,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,466)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   215,507
<SALES>                                         74,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,180
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,495
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,213)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,245)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,968)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,968)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.52)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-200-1430-EQ COC-63465]


Notice of Realty Action--Chaffee County, CO

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of realty action COC-63465, Federal Land Policy and 
Management Act Section 302 Lease, in Chaffee County, Colorado.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following public land, northeast of Salida, Colorado is 
available for lease under Section 302 of the Federal Land Policy and 
Management Act of 1976 as amended, and the regulations thereunder 43 
CFR 2920 for agricultural use.

New Mexico Principal Meridian, Colorado

T. 50 N., R. 8E., Section 14 S\1/2\S\1/2\SE\1/4\NE\1/4\, an 800 foot 
by 200 foot portion consisting of approximately 3.67 acres.

    Adjacent landowner Chris Nachtrieb would be offered a 20 year lease 
to allow a center pivot irrigation system that exists on his adjacent 
private land to cross and irrigate the above described Public land as 
well as operate a hay production operation thereon.

DATES: Interested parties may submit comments on this action on or 
before June 15, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Field Officer Manager, Bureau of Land Management, 3170 East 
Main St., Canon City, CO 81212.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Hallock, BLM Realty Specialist, 
at the above address, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e286839487bd8a838e8e8d8189a2a1adcca0aeafcc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="35515443506a5d5459595a565e75767a1b7779781b525a43">[email protected]</span></a>, or phone: (719) 
269-8536.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The pivot irrigation system is crossing the 
corner of an isolated 40 acre parcel of Public land that is surrounded 
by private land and is without legal public access.

Levi D. Deike,
Field Office Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-10586 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-6420) of Petroleum Geo-Services ASA
and in the Prospectuses constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form
F-3 (Registration No. 333-90379) of Petroleum Geo-Services ASA and part of the
Registration Statement on Form F-4 (Registration No. 333-9702) of Petroleum
Geo-Services ASA, of our report dated March 12, 2001, except as to the last five
paragraphs of Note 11, which are as of April 30, 2001, and as to the third
paragraph of Note 1 and Note 24, which are as of May 10, 2002, relating to the
financial statements of Petroleum Geo-Services ASA, which appear on this annual
report on Form 20-F.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Houston, Texas
May 21, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 84 (Monday, May 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10749]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Closed Meeting of the Board of Visitors for the Department of 
Defense Centers for Regional Security Studies

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Public Law 92-463, the ``Federal 
Advisory Committee Act,'' notice of a meeting of the Board of Visitors 
for Department of Defense Centers for Regional Security must be 
published.
    The Board will meet in closed session at the Pentagon on April 26 
from 0900 to 1330.
    The purpose of the meeting is to allow the Board of Visitors to 
provide advice on the role the Centers for Regional Security play in 
the broader U.S. national security context. The Board will hold 
classified discussions on various national security policies to be 
handled by the regional centers as outlined in the Defense Planning 
Guidance and related to the Theater Engagement Plans of the Commanders-
in-Chief of the Unified Commands. This notice is being published less 
than fifteen days prior to the meeting because of a scheduling 
oversight.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II (1982), it has 
been determined that this meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
Sec. 552b (c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this meeting will be 
closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Berry, (703) 695-6386.

    Dated: April 21, 2000.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-10749 Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-10-V
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 28, 2020 No. 04-20-00424-CV IN RE David E. MARTINEZ From the County Court at Law, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. Honorable Lewis G. Owens Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice On July 27, 2020, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and requested expedited consideration due to the upcoming deadline to send out ballots. This court believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(b). Respondent and Real Party in Interest may file a response to the petition in this court no later than September 4, 2020. Any response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. It is so ORDERED August 28, 2020. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT
# C_2019016EN.01004601.xml

| 14.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/46

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 October 2018 — Taminco v EFSA

(Case T-621/17 R)

((Application for interim measures - Plant protection products - Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 - Publication of the conclusion of the examination carried out by EFSA on the review of the approval of the active substance thiram - Claim for confidential treatment of certain sections - Refusal to grant confidentiality - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency))

(2019/C 16/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Taminco BVBA (Ghent, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Grunchard, lawyers)

Defendant: European Food Safety Authority (represented by: D. Detken and S. Gabbi, acting as Agents, and by R. van der Hout and C. Wagner, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Koleva and I. Naglis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of the decision of EFSA of 18 July 2017 rejecting the claims for confidential treatment made in the context of the application for the renewal of the approval of the active substance thiram.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The order of 19 September 2017 delivered in Case T-621/17 R is cancelled. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The order of 19 September 2017 delivered in Case T-621/17 R is cancelled.

| 3. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The costs are reserved.

---