alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-50376

Summary Calendar

_____________________

GARY G. WRIGHT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

K. C. LOVE, Doctor,

Boyd Unit,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-95-CV-79

_________________________________________________________________

October 25, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Gary Gene Wright, # 612278, appeals from the district court’s

order dismissing his civil rights actions as frivolous pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). He argues that Dr. Love was

deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation

of the Eighth Amendment. We have reviewed the record and Wright’s-2-

brief and affirm the district court’s dismissal for essentially the

reasons adopted by the district court. W right v. Love

, No.

W-95-CV-79 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 24, 1996). We do not address Wright’s

retaliation claim because it does not rise to the level of plain

error. S ee Robertson v. Plano City of Tex. , 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th

Cir. 1995).

Wright presents no legal points arguable on their merits, and

the appeal is frivolous. S ee Howard v. King

, 707 F.2d 215, 220

(5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED.

See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2. We previously warned Wright in Wright v.

Carpenter

, No. 95-10951 (5th Cir. Apr. 12, 1996), that further

prosecution of frivolous matters in this court would invite the

imposition of sanctio ns and cautioned him to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they did not raise frivolous arguments.

Wright has not heeded this warning. Accordingly, Wright is barred

from filing any pro se

, in forma pauperis civil appeal in t his

court, or any pro se

, in forma pauperis

, initial civil pleading in

any court that is subject to this court’s jurisdiction, without the

advance written permission of a judge of the forum court; the clerk

of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts in this

circuit are directed to return to Wright, unfiled, any attempted

submission inconsistent with this bar.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION IMPOSED.-3-
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, John A. Labate, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Golden Star Resources Ltd.,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 of Golden Star Resources Ltd. that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-k fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Golden Star Resources Ltd.



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|/s/ John A. Labate                                                                
|John A. Labate Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer February 24, 2010
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 4.11

                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF
                           TRUSTMARK CAPITAL TRUST III

               THIS Certificate of Trust of Trustmark Capital Trust III (the
"Trust"), dated as of March 14, 2003, is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory
Trust Act (12 Del. Code, ss. 3801 et seq.) (the "Act").

               1. Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is
Trustmark Capital Trust III.

               2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee
of the Trust in the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company, 1100 North
Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attn: Corporate Trust
Administration.

               3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
upon filing.

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this
Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act.

                               WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, as
                               Delaware Trustee

                               By: /s/ Mary St. Amand
                                   ----------------------------------------
                               Name:  Mary St. Amand
                               Title: AVP


                               WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, as
                               Property Trustee


                               By: /s/ Mary St. Amand
                                   ----------------------------------------
                               Name:  Mary St. Amand
                               Title: AVP

                               /s/ Richard Hickson
                               --------------------------------------------
                               Richard Hickson, as Administrative Trustee

                               /s/ Zach Wasson
                               --------------------------------------------
                               Zach Wasson, as Administrative Trustee

                               /s/ T. Harris Collier III
                               --------------------------------------------
                               T. Harris Collier III, as Administrative Trustee
EXHIBIT A

Schedule of Claims Subject to the Five Hundred Twenty-Third Omnibus Objection 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23729-1 Filed:03/08/23 Entered:03/08/23 14:24:26 Desc:

Exhibit A - Schedule of Claims Subject to the Five Hundred Twenty-Third Omnibus Page 1 of 2
PRIORITY 

STATUS

Five Hundred Twenty-Third Omnibus Objection

Exhibit A - Claims to Be Reclassified, Reduced, and Allowed

ASSERTED MODIFIED AND ALLOWED

NAME DEBTOR

PRIORITY 

CLAIM # STATUS AMOUNT DEBTOR AMOUNT

 1 MORALES BURGOS, 18274 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 503(b)(9) $556.34 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Unsecured $412.22

RAMON R.

URB. PASSEO DEL VALLE 

G-1

ANASCO, PR 00610

Reason: Goods listed on claim were received outside of the prescribed 20-day receipt period under 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(9) and thus not entitled to administrative priority. Additionally, 

invoices totaling $144.12 were paid via checks 00084593 and 00199536 on 12/28/2016 and 08/02/2018. Accordingly, claim has been reduced and reclassified as a general unsecured 

claim in the amount of $412.22.

 2 ORGANIZACIONES ONETO, 17777 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 503(b)(9) $83,303.02 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Unsecured $140.00

INC

425 CARR 693 PMB 500

DORADO, PR 00646

Reason: Invoices totaling $2,525.50 were paid via checks 00276397 and 00283572 on 05/24/2019 and 06/26/2019. Additionally proof of claim purports to assert liabilities associated 

with the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, but liabilities totaling $80,334.52 fails to provide sufficient supporting documentation for asserting the liabilities against the Commonwealth of 

Puerto Rico, such that the Debtors are unable to determine whether claimant has valid liabilities against the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or any of the other Title III debtors. For the 

remaining amount, claimant asserted administrative priority under 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(9), but goods listed on claim were received outside of the prescribed 20-day receipt period under 

11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(9) and thus not entitled to administrative priority. Accordingly, claim has been reduced and reclassified as a general unsecured claim in the amount of $140.00. 

Claim #17777 also contained on Exhibit A to the 391st Omnibus Claims Objection for Modified Claims.

1

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23729-1 Filed:03/08/23 Entered:03/08/23 14:24:26 Desc:

Exhibit A - Schedule of Claims Subject to the Five Hundred Twenty-Third Omnibus Page 2 of 2
# Official Journal L 181/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 181 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 639 June 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 181

English edition

Legislation

Volume 639 June 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2020/751 of 27 May 2020 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Belarus on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation | 1 |
| | * | Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Belarus on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2020/751 of 27 May 2020 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Belarus on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation

1

*

Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Belarus on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24185 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 16:27:17 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1Section 1350 CertificationsIn connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Premier Exhibitions, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended August 31, 2007, Arnie Geller, the Chairman of the Company,and Stephen Couture, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certifies,that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: October 10, 2007 /s/ Arnie Geller   Arnie Geller   Chairman
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3504 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3504

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
  redesignate the American Indian Education Foundation as the National 
            Fund for Excellence in American Indian Education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN EDUCATION FOUNDATION.

    (a) Redesignation.--Section 501(a) of title V of the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 458bbb(a)), as 
added by Public Law 106-568, is amended by striking ``the American 
Indian Education Foundation'' and inserting ``a foundation to be known 
as the `National Fund for Excellence in American Indian Education' 
(hereinafter referred to as the `Foundation')''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Title V of the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 458bbb), as added 
by Public Law 106-568, is amended--
        (1) in the heading to read as follows:

``TITLE V--NATIONAL FUND FOR EXCELLENCE IN AMERICAN INDIAN EDUCATION'';

    and
        (2) in the heading of section 501 to read as follows:

``SEC. 501. NATIONAL FUND FOR EXCELLENCE IN AMERICAN INDIAN 
              EDUCATION.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Visual Resource Management

within the Billings

Field Office Planning Area

Alternative B

0 2 4 8 12 16 20

Miles

Map 39

Roundup Harlowton

^_

_^

T7N

Pompeys Pillar

^_

T Big Timber N1 _^

Billings

_^

T2 Columbus S ^_

Bridger

_^

T8S

R18E R29E Montana

R104W R93W

T Wyoming 57N

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings 

Field 

Office

Ü

Map scale 1:900,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in May 2015

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Legend

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Visual Resource Management

Class I

Class II

Class III

Rivers

^_ Towns

Public Lands Survey System
EXHIBIT A

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23979-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:22:20 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23979-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:22:20 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23979-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:22:20 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 3 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23979-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:22:20 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 4 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23979-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:22:20 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 5 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23979-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:22:20 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 6 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23979-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:22:20 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 7 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23979-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:22:20 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 8 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23979-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:22:20 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 9 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23979-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:22:20 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 10 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23979-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:22:20 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 11 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23979-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:22:20 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 12 of 13
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23979-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:22:20 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 13 of 13
EXHIBIT A 

Schedule of Claims Subject to the Five Hundred Thirty-Third Omnibus Objection 

 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23734-1 Filed:03/08/23 Entered:03/08/23 14:35:17 Desc:

Exhibit A - Schedule of Claims Subject to the Five Hundred Thirty-Third Omnibus Page 1 of 2
NAME

FIVE HUNDRED THIRTY-THIRD OMNIBUS OBJECTION

Exhibit A – Subsequently Amended Claims

CLAIM # CLAIM AMOUNT

CASE NUMBER/

 DEBTOR

DATE 

FILED

CLAIMS TO BE DISALLOWED REMAINING AMENDED CLAIMS

NAME CLAIM # CLAIM AMOUNT

CASE NUMBER/

 DEBTOR

DATE 

FILED

MEMBERS OF SUCESION 

YESMIN GALIB

MARÍA E VICÉNS

9140 CALLE MARINA

SUITE 801

PONCE, PR 00717

1 PUERTO RICO 11497

ELECTRIC 

POWER 

AUTHORITY

5/8/2018

17-03283

$53,706.38 MEMBERS OF SUCESION 

YESNMIN GALIB

MARIA E. VICENS

1218 AVE HOSTOS, SUITE 117

PONCE, PR 00717

PUERTO RICO 179742

ELECTRIC 

POWER 

AUTHORITY

3/10/2022 $117,990.00

17-03283

Reason: Amended and superseded by a later filed Proof of Claim

VALDIVIESO, JORGE LUCAS P

MARÍA E VICÉNS

9140 CALLE MARINA

SUITE 801

PONCE, PR 00717

2 PUERTO RICO 11790

ELECTRIC 

POWER 

AUTHORITY

5/8/2018

17-03283

$53,706.38 VALDIVIESO, JORGE LUCAS P

MARIA E. VICENS

1218 AVE HOSTOS, SUITE 117

PONCE, PR 00717

PUERTO RICO 179741

ELECTRIC 

POWER 

AUTHORITY

3/10/2022 $117,990.00

17-03283

Reason: Amended and superseded by a later filed Proof of Claim

Page 1 of 1

* - Indicates claim contains unliquidated and/or undetermined amounts.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23734-1 Filed:03/08/23 Entered:03/08/23 14:35:17 Desc:

Exhibit A - Schedule of Claims Subject to the Five Hundred Thirty-Third Omnibus Page 2 of 2
#### HAYS *v.*MAY.

Negotiable notes — endorser and endorsee — proof of real transactions between tire parties.

An agreement between the bolder of a note and his endorsee, that the lattcr'shall sue the note, &c. and if he fail to collect, the endorser will pay; him the amount, is an .agreement independent of the endorsement, and no way affects the legal interest transferred.

As between, the parties to an endorsement of a negotiable note, the veal transaction midef which the endorsement was made may always be shown, though it is otherwise, as it regards strangers.

Where amóte is endorsed,after due, or with notice of the real transaction between the parties, the circumstances may be proven. .

.Assumpsit. The declaration contained three counts: — 1st. Upon a note for one hundred and twenty dollars, dated in December, 1826, payable by Clark to May, on interest from date, without any day •of payment named. 2d. Upon a contract, that in consideration the plaintiff would receive *the*note in ,payment of a sum due from defendant, and in a reasonable time proceed to recover the same by suit at law, .if it was not recovered he would pay the amount and interest, avers that he sued, recovered a judgment, and obtained execution, which is not satisfied. 3d. The *common money*counts. Plea — non assumpsit-

*Willey*and *E. Whittlesey,*for the plaintiff,

abandoned the first count, after the evidence was heard.

*S. J. Andrews,*for the defendant,

objected that the contract set forth in the second e.ount, if found, operated to restrain the endorsement in blank, in .its legal mercantile effect,.and so was inadmissible.

Whisht, J.

to the jury. The point made by the defendant’s counsel, is not tenable. The endorsement of the note transfers the legal ownership to the endorsee, and is not in any way affected by the agreement set up in evidence. That is an independent agreement, for a good consideration, and affects .not the legal transfer. But the endorsement on a note, as between the parties, has no such sanctity as counsel suppose. Between strangers, if the endorsement was made before the note fell due, it would transfer the interest, so that the endorser would not be at liberty to show any of the.circumstances attending the transfer to affect the right of the holder. But, as between the endorser and endorsee, the real 'transaction may always be shown. If the contract, therefore, is *81proven to your satisfaction, and the plaintiff has done what he was bound to do by it, he is entitled to a verdict for the note and interest.

Verdict for the plaintiff, and judgment.
§ 303.22 Processing. ( a ) *Expedited processing for proposed institutions.* ( 1 ) An application for deposit insurance for a proposed institution which will be a subsidiary of an eligible depository institution as defined in § 303.2(r) or an eligible holding company will be acknowledged in writing by the FDIC and will receive expedited processing unless the applicant is notified in writing to the contrary and provided with the basis for that decision. An eligible holding company is defined as a bank or thrift holding company that has consolidated assets of at least $150 million or more; a BOPEC rating of at least “2” for bank holding companies or an above average or “A” rating for thrift holding companies; and at least 75 percent of its consolidated depository institution assets comprised of eligible depository institutions. The FDIC may remove an application from expedited processing for any of the reasons set forth in § 303.11(c)(2).
( 2 ) Under expedited processing, the FDIC will take action on an application within 60 days of receipt of a substantially complete application or 5 days after the expiration of the comment period described in § 303.23, whichever is later. Final action may be withheld until the FDIC has assurance that permission to organize the proposed institution will be granted by the chartering authority. Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(1) of this section, if the FDIC does not act within the expedited processing period, it does not constitute an automatic or default approval.
( b ) *Standard processing.* For those applications that are not processed pursuant to the expedited procedures, the FDIC will provide the applicant with written notification of the final action when the decision is rendered.
[67 FR 79247, Dec. 27, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 50459, Aug. 21, 2003]
% Food exposure 
% Once daily oral exposure, dose from cpfs SS F13_49 foodonly exp distribution.csv 10th percentile  
% Female adult, Body weight set to 72.9 kg
% Cecilia Tan
% August 24, 2015

prepare @clear @all
% Setting model parameters
start @NoCallback
use human_parameters_MRP
use preg_female_parameters
BWSW=1;		% Set to 1 if BWT is provided
BWST=72.9;	% Initial BW in kg
PREG=0;		% Not pregnant
TSTOP= 1008; 	% Exposure duration in hrs

%Single daily exposure
DT = xlsRead("Food.xls", "10p", "A1:A43"); % Dosing Times
DORAL=xlsRead("Food.xls", "10p", "B1:B43"); % Dose in ug/kg 
prepare time rbcce cv urinetcpy
start@nocallback

mytable = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6]; %conc unit = ug/L
save mytable @file='food_10.txt' @format=ascii
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 October 2006 — Van der Spree v Commission

(Case T-182/04) (1)

(Officials - Career Development Report - 2001/2002 appraisal period - Articles 26 and 43 of the Staff Regulations - Rights of the defence - Annulment )

(2006/C 310/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Daniel Van der Spree (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and H. Krämer, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 25 June 2003 drawing up the definitive version of the applicant's Career Development Report for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 179, 10.7.2004.

----
Editorial Note on Part 702
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 702 appear at 84 FR 1606, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 702.412 Effect of a merger or dissolution on the treatment of Subordinated Debt as Regulatory Capital. ( a ) In the event of a merger of an Issuing Credit Union into or the assumption of its Subordinated Debt by another federally insured credit union, the Subordinated Debt will be treated as Regulatory Capital only to the extent that the resulting credit union is either a LICU, a complex credit union, and/or a new credit union.
( b ) In the event the resulting credit union is not a LICU, a complex credit union, or a new credit union, the Subordinated Debt of the merging credit union can either be: ( 1 ) If permitted by the terms of the Subordinated Debt Note, repaid by the resulting credit union upon approval by the NCUA under § 702.411; or
( 2 ) Continue to be held by the resulting credit union as Subordinated Debt, but will not be classified as Regulatory Capital under this subpart, unless the resulting credit union meets the eligibility requirements of § 702.403.
( c ) In the event of a voluntary dissolution of an Issuing Credit Union that has outstanding Subordinated Debt, the Subordinated Debt may be repaid in full according to 12 CFR part 710, subject to the requirements in § 702.411.