alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### LAWSON *v.*PERRY.

Assumpsit — implied in law — release by a witness — competent witness — color of parties--* costs.

A part owner ofa boat who has become insolvent and assigned his interest, reserving a right *to*the residuum of his effects, if any, is incompetent as a witness for his co-partner.

Quen?, if a release by him to the party calling him, will make him competent.

Where a man is employed in a particular business, but nothing is said about the wages, the law implies a promise to pay the common wages for such service.

That a party to a suit is a colored man no otherwise affects it than to impose upon the jury the obligation to avoid its influence.

If the situation of the parties be such that the plaintiff must rely upon the books of the defendant, a jury should require of the defendant more perfect proof of his defence.

If a plaintiff in assumpsit recover less than 150 dollars he recovers no costs.

Assumpsit, for wages as steward of the steamboat Pioneer. The plaintiff proved the service and the common rate of wages. The defendant proved certain payments, and then called Austin as a witness, who admitted that he had been part owner of the Pioneer, but having failed he had assigned his interest to Perry, having now no interest except in the residuum, should there be any.

Hawes, for the plaintiff,

objected that the witness was interested. Court. He seems directly interested.

*N.*Wright,

then tpok from the witness a release to Perry.

*Hawes*

still objected.

Court.

We will reject the evidence, and the question as to the release can be *mooted*hereafter if the defendant desire it.

Wright, J.

to the jury. The plaintiff claims for wages as steward of the Pioneer. If he has satisfied you of the service, the law raises the presumption that he'was to have *common wages,*which in this case is admitted to be $25 a month, tie will be entitled to recover at that rate during the time he was employed unless the defendant shall have shown you by affirmative testimony some understanding between the parties inconsistent with the presumption of law. The defendant is also to show you the payments, if any. You have nothing to do with the color of the plaintiff, except to take care not to be influenced by the circumstance, that be is not of your color. The relation of the parties is no otherwise material than to ascertain if from the nature of the employment the plaintiff must of necessity rely upon the defendant’s officers and books for his accounts. If so, it imposes upon'the defendant a stronger obligation to show to you by clear evidence, the precise transaction and payments.

Verdict for the plaintiff, $94 50.

Defendant moved for a new trial, which was overruled and judgment entered on the verdict without costs.
**Exhibit10.10****TRADEMARK ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY**     WHEREAS, SentitO Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), has adopted, used and isusing the marks shown in the attached Schedule A (the “Marks”), for which there areregistrations or applications in the United States Patent and Trademark Office under the numbersshown in the attached Schedule A; and     WHEREAS, Company entered into certain Joinder Agreement dated as of the date hereof in favorof Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. (“Laurus”) pursuant to which Company became obligated to Lauruspursuant to (i) a certain Security Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2006, among VersoTechnologies, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“Verso”), certain subsidiaries of Verso and Laurus and(ii) a certain Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2006, amongVerso, certain subsidiaries of Verso and Laurus (as each may be amended, modified, restated orsupplemented from time to time, collectively, the “Agreements”); and     WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreements, Company is granting to Laurus a security interest in theMarks, the goodwill of the business symbolized by the Marks, and the registrations and applicationstherefor.     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,Company does hereby grant to Laurus a security interest in and to the Marks, together with thegoodwill of the business symbolized by the Marks, and registrations and applications therefor,which security interest shall secure all the Obligations as defined in the Agreements and inaccordance with the terms and provisions thereof.     Company expressly acknowledges and affirms that the rights and remedies of Laurus with respectto the security interest granted hereby are more fully set forth in the Agreements.Dated asof: April 18, 2007      SENTITO NETWORKS, INC.
EXHIBIT 14(a)(1)(iii)
                                                                     Page 1 of 2

                                 [CLARION LOGO]

                                                               Bruce G. Morrison
                                                               Managing Director

April 13, 1999

State Street Bank and Trust Company
Corporate Trust Department - 5th Floor
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Attn: Morgan Stanley Series 1998-XL1

Midland Loan Services, Inc.
210 West 10th Street
Kansas City, MO 64105
Attn: President

Fitch IBCA, Inc.
One State Street Plaza, 31st Floor
New York, NY 10004
Attn: Commercial Mortgage Surveillance

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
1585 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
Attn: Cecilia Tarrant
cc: Gregory Walker, Esq.

Morrison & Heckler LLP
2600 Grand Avenue
Kansas City, MO 64108
Attn: William A. Hirsch

Standard & Poor's Rating Service
26 Broadway
New York, NY 10004
Attn: Commercial Mortgage Surveillance

RE:   Morgan Stanley Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
      Certificates Series 1998-XL1

Dear Sirs or Madams:

This Officer's Certificate is provided to you by Clarion Partners, LLC
("Clarion") pursuant to Section 3.14 of that certain Pooling and Servicing
Agreement ("PSA") dated as of June 1, 1998 relative to the above referenced
securitization for which Clarion acts as Special Servicer. Capitalized terms
used herein shall bear the meaning ascribed to them in the PSA unless otherwise
defined in this letter.

The undersigned officer, on behalf of Clarion, hereby informs you that (i) a
review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the proceeding calendar
year and of its performance under this Agreement has been made under such
officer's supervision, (ii) to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on
such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under
this Agreement in all material respects throughout such year or, if there has

                                CLARION PARTNERS
       335 MADISON AVENUE / NEW YORK, NY 10017 / DIRECT TEL 212-883-2517 /
             DIRECT FAX 212-883-2817 / E-MAIL morrison@clarionp.com


                                      -11-
<PAGE>

                                                                     Page 2 of 2

April 13, 1999
Page 2

been a default in the fulfillment of any such obligation, it has been noted
herein, and (iii) that the Special Servicer has maintained an effective internal
control system over the servicing of mortgage loans including Mortgage Loans and
other loans, and (iv) the Special Servicer has received no notice regarding the
qualification, or challenging the status, of the Upper-Tier REMIC or Lower-Tier
REMIC as a REMIC from the IRS or any other governmental agency or body.

Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at the
number referenced above.

Sincerely,

Clarion Partners, LLC
a New York limited liability company,
its authorized agent


By: /s/ Bruce G. Morrison
   ----------------------------
   Bruce G. Morrison
   Authorized Person


                                      -12-
#### WAGGONER v. RICHMOND.

Slander — affidavit to account — peijury—no slander to charge one of an offence which could not be committed.

It is competent in slander to inquire as to the pecuniary ability of the defendant.

An affidavit made to an account to be filed before a justice, is not authorized by law, and no perjury can be committed by swearing falsely in it.

It is not actionable to accuse one of perjury in reference to such oath, because perjury could not be committed by it.

Slander. Words, *you are perjured.*Plea, not guilty, with notice that plaintiff did commit perjury in swearing to an account to prepare it for a set-off on the trial of a cause before a justice of the peace.

The plaintiff proved by *Rary,*a witness, that the defendant said of the plaintiff, he was a perjured rascal. The witness was then 'asked what were the defendant’s pecuniary circumstances.

*G.*Swan, for the defendant

objected to this.

*O. Parish,*for the plaintiff objected,

that the affidavit was extrajudicial and void — no perjury could be committed by such swearing and therefore such matter is no bar to the action.

*G. Swan,*contra.

*G. Swan,*

cross-examined the witness, who said the defendant, when he uttered the slander, was talking about the affidavit that the plaintiff had made before the trial at the justice’s, and it was *in reference to that only*that he charged the plaintiff with committing perjury.

*Swan*

then moved for a non suit.

*Parish,*

opposed the motion.

By the Court.

The question may be asked. The circumstances of the parties may be shown to the jury upon the question of damages. It is obvious that what would ruin one man might be a sum so trifling in the estimation of another as to be no punishment whatever to him.

The witness answered that' he was a wealthy man.

The plaintiff then rested.

The defendant offered in evidence the affidavit described in the notice.

By the Court. The evidence is inadmissible; this kind of affidavit is not within the statute defining *perjury.*What ever offence the party may have committed by swearing falsely to this affidavit, it is clear to us, no legal perjury was' committed.

*174O. *Parish,*

argued to the jury.

By the Court. The evidence tends to prove the case; its effect is for the jury. The motion is overruled.

The Court, to the jury. The charge here is perjury; but if the evidence satisfies you that the conversation and charge related to the affidavit made before the trial at the justice’s court, and was so understood, it must be so limited by you; and inasmuch as perjury could not be committed by the affidavit, the charge could not be perjury. Upon the same principle, to charge a man with being a *murderer*because he killed a dog, would not sustain an action. If you find that was the case here upon the evidence, the defendant is entitled to your verdict. 20 *John. R.*344.

Verdict and judgment for the defendant.
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of APA Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anil K.
Jain, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   The  information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

February 10, 2005

Signature: /s/ Anil K. Jain
           ----------------
Print Name: Anil K. Jain
            ------------
Print Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
             ---------------------------------------------------


<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-249-000]

Take notice that on April 14, 2000, Transwestern Pipeline Company (Transwestern) tendered for filing to become part of Transwestern's FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, proposed to become effective on May 15, 2000:

                        Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 48                              ( print page 24464)    

Original Sheet No. 97

Sheet No. 98 

Transwestern states that the purpose of this filing is to provide that Transwestern may contract for natural gas transportation services on Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) in order to expand and enhance its own transportation service.

Transwestern further states that copies of the filing have been mailed to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10338  Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

          - [Order No. 1085] 

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: 

Whereas, the Bi-State Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 146 (Lawrence County, Illinois), submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand FTZ 146 to include the Effingham Industrial Park in Effingham (Effingham County), Illinois (Site 2), adjacent to the St. Louis, Missouri, Customs port of entry (FTZ Docket 29-99; filed 6/2/99); 

                    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (64 FR 32023, 6/15/99) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                 

Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest; 

Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders: 

The application to expand FTZ 146 is approved, subject to the Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of April 2000. 

Troy H. Cribb, 

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

Dennis Puccinelli, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-10535 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3727 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3727

 For the relief of Maria Del Refugio Plascencia and Alfredo Plascencia-
                                 Lopez.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 2004

  Mr. Lantos introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 For the relief of Maria Del Refugio Plascencia and Alfredo Plascencia-
                                 Lopez.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MARIA DEL REFUGIO PLASCENCIA 
              AND ALFREDO PLASCENCIA-LOPEZ.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Maria Del Refugio 
Plascencia and Alfredo Plascencia-Lopez shall each be eligible for 
issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 
alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 
application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such 
Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Maria Del Refugio Plascencia or 
Alfredo Plascencia-Lopez enters the United States before the filing 
deadline specified in subsection (c), he or she shall be considered to 
have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be 
eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Maria Del Refugio Plascencia 
and Alfredo Plascencia-Lopez, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 
proper officer to reduce by 2, during the current or next following 
fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the aliens' birth under section 
203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 
total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 
the country of the aliens' birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 121.263 Fire-extinguishing systems. ( a ) Unless the certificate holder shows that equivalent protection against destruction of the airplane in case of fire is provided by the use of fireproof materials in the nacelle and other components that would be subjected to flame, fire-extinguishing systems must be provided to serve all designated fire zones.
( b ) Materials in the fire-extinguishing system must not react chemically with the extinguishing agent so as to be a hazard.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10629]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Olympic Provincial Interagency Executive Committee (PIEC) 
Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION:  Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Olympic PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on May 19, 2000. 
The meeting will be held at the Olympic Natural Resource Center's 
conference room in Forks, Washington. The meeting will begin at 9:00 AM 
and end at approximately 3:30 PM. Agenda topics are: (1) Survey and 
Manage Forest Management Strategy; (2) Intergovernmental Advisory 
Committee Update; (3) Regional Ecosystems Office Update; (4) Olympic 
Discovery Trail Proposal; (5) Open forum; and (6) Public comments.
    All Olympic Province Advisory Committee Meetings are open to the 
public. Interested citizens are encourage to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Ken Eldredge, Province Liaison, USDA, Olympic National 
Forest Headquarters, 1835 Black Lake Blvd., Olympia, WA 98512-5623, 
(360) 956-2323 or Dale Hom, Forest Supervisor, at (360) 956-2301.

    Dated: April 17, 2000.
Dale Hom,
Forest Supervisor, Olympic National Forest.
[FR Doc. 00-10629 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         196
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               196
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,356
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       694,537
<OTHER-SE>                                     (700,697)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (6,160)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,356)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,356)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,356)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.002)



</TABLE>