alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Texas DepartmentofTransportation
DEWITT C GREER STATE HIGHWAY BLDG.• 125 E. 11TH STREET·AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701-2483 •(512) 463-8585 September 17, 2009

Ms. Lisa Jackson, EPAAdministrator USEPA Headquarters Ariel Rios Building, Room 3000 1200 PennsylvaniaAvenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 Dear Ms. Jackson:
It has come to my attention thatthe U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works is conducting hearings on the possible reclassification of fly ash from a solid waste to a hazardous solid waste. The Texas DepartmentofTransportation (TxDOT) is concerned that the reclassification of coal fly ash as hazardous solid waste would drastically, if not totally eliminate, fly ash from the Texas market. Although we understand the hazardous classification is not intended to impact fly ash for beneficial use, we believe that this classification will have a severely negative impact on the supplyoffly ash for beneficial use. TxDOT concrete operations annually consume approximately 300,000 tons of fly ash thatwould have otherwise been disposed ofin landfills. TxDOT relies heavilyon fly ash as a method for mitigating alkali-silica reaction and external sulfate attack, controlling heat generation in mass concrete structures and prestressed concrete products, and reducing the potential ofcorrosion of reinforcing steel in marine environments. It is also utilized in areas of the state that use deicing chemicals. If the supply of fly ash is impacted by reclassification, TxDOT will be hard-pressed to build transportation structures that will last their intended service life. The projected annual savings from initial cost alone is estimated to be $16,000,000. Savings due to the benefits of more durable concrete far outweighsthe savingsfrom the initial cost. There are limited supplies of alternative materials that can be used in lieu of fly ash, most ofwhich are not readily available in Texas. Compared to fly ash, these alternative materials are two to threetimesthe cost ofcement, whereasfly ash is onlyone-third the cost ofcement. TxDOT cannot afford to rely on these alternative materials as a means to specifyeconomicallydurable concrete.

THETEXAS PLIl,N REDUCE CONGESTION· ENHANCE SAFETY· EXPAND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY· IMPROVE AIR QUALITY INCREASETHE VALUE OFOUR TRANSPORTATION ASSETS
An Equal OpportumtyEmployer

### Ms. Lisa Jackson 

### -2- September 17, 2009

Reclassifying fly ash as a hazardous solid waste could potentially eliminate a vital resource thatTxDOT depends on to build long-lasting durable concrete structures. We strongly urgeyou to considerthe consequencesthatTxDOTas well as other DOT's and users of concrete products will face iffly ash is no longer supplied for beneficial use. For more detailed information on TxDOT's utilization of fly ash, please contact Ms. Lisa Lukefahr at (512) 506-5858.

# a:e~~ 

# h I

Amadeo Saenz, Jr., P.E. ) Executive Director

cc: Dianna F. Noble, P.E., Director, EnvironmentalAffairs Division, TxDOT Thomas Bohuslav, P.E., Director, Construction Division, TxDOT Lisa Lukefahr, P.E., Construction Division, TxDOT Toribio Garza, P.E., Director, Maintenance Division, TxDOT Texas Congressional Delegation
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF KPMG LLP



The Board of Directors
Aksys, Ltd.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-
18073) on Form S-8 of Aksys, Ltd. of our report dated January 27, 1999, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of Aksys, Ltd. as of December 31, 1998, and
1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1998, and for the period from January 18, 1991 (inception) through
December 31, 1998, which report appears in the December 31, 1998 Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Aksys, Ltd.


                            KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 30, 1999
# FILED
February

5, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr . App ellate C ou rt Clerk IN THE COU RT OF A PPEA LS OF TENN ESSEE EASTERN SECTION A T KNOXVILLE

ROSCOE W. FIELDS, SR., ) ) Plaintiff/Appellant ) KNOX CIR CUIT ) v. ) ) BOBBY RAY

McGEE and ) NO. 03A01-9609- CV-00296 LILLIAN BEAN, ) ) Defendants/Appellees ) AFFIRMED

Roscoe W. Fields, Pro Se, Appellant Mary Ann Stackhouse, Knox ville, For Appellees

M E M O R A ND U M OP I N I O N INMAN, Se nior Jud ge Mr. Fie lds sa ys tha t Joe Torr ence , the Circu it Cou rt Cle rk of Davids on Co unty, charged him an excessi ve fee for a cert ified copy of a tr affic citation, for which he atte mpt ed to seek redre ss in G ene ral Se ssio ns Co urt o f Kn ox Cou nty. He says t hat the Judge of the Knox County General Sessi ons Court and t he Clerk thereof refused to allow him to file his warrant, whereupon he attempte d to file it in Dav idson County , and was rebuffed; he thereupon attempted to file a redres sing action in the D avidson Ch ancery Co urt, and was again reb uffed. He returned to Knox County, and filed th is pro se action for damages against Judge McGee and Clerk Bean , assertingthat they v iolated his c ivil rights under 42 U. S. C. §1983, by refusingto allow him to file the ac

tion against

Clerk Torr

ence. The trial judg e directed a v erdict for the d efendants at the clos e of the plaintiff’s case, holding that he had failed to make out a prima facie

case.

This is a prop er case for affirmance under R ULE 10, R ULES OF THE C OURT OF1 10. Affirmance Without Opinion - Memorandum Opinion. (b) Memorandu m Opinion. The Court, with the concurrence of all judgesparticipati ng in the cas e, may affirm, rever

se or modify t he actions ofthe trial cou rt by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedentialvalue. When a case is dec ided by memorandu m opinion it shall b e d esignated “ MEMORAND UM OPINION ,” shall not be pu bli shed, and shall not b e cited or relied on for any reason in a subsequent unrelated case. [As amended by order

filed April 22, 1992.] 2 A PPEALS
. 1 Costs are as sessed to the appel lant.

__________________________________ W illiam H. I nman, Senior Ju dge CONCUR:

______________________________ Don T. Mc Murray, Jud ge

______________________________ Charles D. Susano , Jr., Jud ge 10. Affi rmance Withou t Opi nion - Memorand um Opini on.

(b) M em ora nd um Op inio n. The Court, wit h the conc urrenc e of al l j udges part ici pati ng in t he case, may affi rm, rever se or modify the act ions ofthe t ri al court by mem orandum opini on when a for mal opini on would h ave no pr ecedenti al v alue. W hen a ca se is d ec ide d b y mem orand um opi ni on i t sha l l be d esi gna te d “ MEMORANDUM OP INIO N,” sh all not be publ ished, and shal l not be ci ted or

rel ied on for any

reason i n a sub seq uen t unre lated c ase . [As a m end ed b y orde r filed A pril 22, 1 992 .]
230518 ORD RE ARES MOT EXT VERSION MAY 18, 2023 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et

al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER GRANTING URGENT CONSENSUAL 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF REPLY DEADLINE

Upon the Urgent Consensual Motion for Extension of Reply Deadline (Docket 

Entry No. 24233 in Case No. 17-3283) (the “Urgent Motion”);2 and the Court having found it has 

subject-matter jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to section 306(a) of PROMESA; and it 

appearing that venue in this district is proper pursuant to section 307(a) of PROMESA; and the 

Court having found the Oversight Board provided adequate and appropriate notice of the Urgent 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“Commonwealth”) (Bankruptcy 

Case No. 17-BK-3283- LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico 

Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3284-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and 

Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) (Last Four 

Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government 

of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3566-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority 

(“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17- BK-4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-BK-5523-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case 

numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

2 Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in 

the Urgent Motion.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24236 Filed:05/18/23 Entered:05/18/23 16:16:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
230518 ORD RE ARES MOT EXT VERSION MAY 18, 2023 2

Motion under the circumstances and no other or further notice is required; and the Court having 

reviewed the Urgent Motion, the Court having found good and sufficient cause exists for the 

granting of the relief as set forth herein, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Urgent Motion is GRANTED as set forth herein. 

2. The Scheduling Order shall be modified as provided herein.

3. The following briefing schedule shall apply:

• The deadline for the Movant to file a reply to the opposition shall be June 13, 2023.

4. The Court will thereafter take the Motion on submission.

5. This Order resolves Docket Entry No. 24233 in Case No. 17-3283.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 18, 2023

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24236 Filed:05/18/23 Entered:05/18/23 16:16:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
(LOGO)
ERNST& YOUNG LLP
Suite 1400
700 Lavaca
Austin, Texas 78701
Phone: 512 478-9881
Fax: 512 473-3499
                        Report of Independent Accountants

Board of Directors
Temple-Inland Financial Services, Inc. and
     Subsidiaries (including Knutson Mortgage
     Corporation)

We have examined  management's  assertion,  included in the accompanying  report
titled Report of Management,  that Temple-Inland  Financial Services,,  Inc. and
Subsidiaries  (including Knutson Mortgage  Corporation) (the "Company ) complied
with  the  minimum  servicing  standards  set  forth  in  the  Mortgage  Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
during the year ended  December  31, 1998.  Management  is  responsible  for the
Company's  compliance with those requirements.  Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on management's  assertions  about the Company's  compliance based on
our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's compliance with those
requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered  necessary in
the circumstances.  We believe that our examination  provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.  Our examination  does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with specified requirements.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the  Company  complied  with the
aforementioned  requirements  during the year ended December 31, 1998, is fairly
stated, in all material respects.

Ernst & Young LLP

January 29, 1999
§ 48.11 Unlawful representations. ( a ) *No implication or representation of limiting losses.* No national bank engaged in retail foreign exchange transactions or its IAPs may imply or represent that it will, with respect to any retail customer forex account, for or on behalf of any person: ( 1 ) Guarantee such person or account against loss;
( 2 ) Limit the loss of such person or account; or
( 3 ) Not call for or attempt to collect margin as established for retail forex customers.
( b ) *No implication of representation of engaging in prohibited acts.* No national bank or its IAPs may in any way imply or represent that it will engage in any of the acts or practices described in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *No Federal government endorsement.* No national bank or its IAPs may represent or imply in any manner whatsoever that any retail forex transaction or retail forex product has been sponsored, recommended, or approved by the OCC, the Federal government, or any agency thereof.
( d ) *Assuming or sharing of liability from bank error.* This section does not prevent a national bank from assuming or sharing in the losses resulting from the national bank's error or mishandling of a retail forex transaction.
( e ) *Certain guaranties unaffected.* This section does not affect any guarantee entered into prior to the effective date of this part, but this section does apply to any extension, modification, or renewal thereof entered into after such date.
Exhibit 99.10





CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON








Golden Star Resources Ltd.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Golden Star Resources Ltd.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





I hereby consent to (i) being named and identified as a “qualified person” in connection with the Golden Star Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2013, included as an exhibit with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Form 40-F”) of the Company to which this consent relates, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from such documents in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-175542, 333-169047, 333-118958, 333-105821 and 333-105820), as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.








/s/ S. Mitchel Wasel


S. Mitchel Wasel


Vice President Exploration








March 24, 2014
§ 650.45 Priority of claims. The following priority of claims shall apply to the distribution of the assets of the Corporation in liquidation: ( a ) All costs, expenses, and debts incurred by the receiver in connection with the administration of the receivership, all Farm Credit Administration assessments for the costs of supervising and examining the Corporation, and any amounts borrowed pursuant to § 650.56(b)(3).
( b ) Administrative expenses of the Corporation, provided that such expenses were incurred within 60 days prior to the receiver's taking possession, and that such expenses shall be limited to reasonable expenses incurred for services actually provided by accountants, attorneys, appraisers, examiners, or management companies, or reasonable expenses incurred by employees that were authorized and reimbursable under a preexisting expense reimbursement policy and that, in the opinion of the receiver, are of benefit to the receivership, and shall not include wages or salaries of employees of the Corporation.
( c ) If authorized by the receiver, claims for wages and salaries, including vacation pay, earned prior to the appointment of the receiver by an employee of the Corporation whom the receiver determines it is in the best interest of the receivership to engage or retain for a reasonable period of time.
( d ) If authorized by the receiver, claims for wages and salaries, including vacation pay, earned prior to the appointment of the receiver, up to a maximum of three thousand dollars ($3,000) per person as adjusted for inflation, by an employee of the Corporation not engaged or retained by the receiver. The adjustment for inflation shall be the percentage by which the Consumer Price Index (as prepared by the Department of Labor) for the calendar year preceding the appointment of the receiver exceeds the Consumer Price Index for the calendar year 1992.
( e ) All claims for taxes.
( f ) All claims of creditors which are secured by specific assets of the Corporation, with priority of conflicting claims of creditors within this same class to be determined in accordance with priorities of applicable Federal or State law.
( g ) All claims of general creditors.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3297] 

# AGENCY:

Department of State. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority of October 19, 1999, I hereby determine that the object to be included in the exhibition “Arms and Armor of 17th Century Virginia,” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, is of cultural significance. This object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with a foreign lender. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Jamestown Settlement Museum, Williamsburg, VA from on or about May 1 to October 31, 2000 is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of exhibit objects, contact Jacqueline Caldwell, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-6982). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44; 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: April 18, 2000. 

William P. Kiehl, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 00-10284 Filed 4-24-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-U
05/25/201 1 1G:34 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS 0001/00 2 

STUAE T A. GOLDSTEIN ' 

BT^J'C A R, SOEE O 

'aOAOD CERTIFIED IN AVIATION LAW 

ALSO ADH<''"^EB> '** blSTRICT OF 

COLU>^*'* * MARYLAND 

LAW OFFICES OF 

GoLDSTETTSr 8c SORD O 

335 0 SOUTH DIXIE MISMWA T 

TENTH FLOOR 

MCA-Mt, FTX>HIZ>A . 0013 0 

i,-.. 

TELEPHONE (305 > e70 - I 22 2 

FAX (305 ) e70-7>::>6B 

sgoldBrein40Oiast«Jn«ordc.ccm 

' bBordQ#9OldCt0inEordo.cofn 

wv^>w, ooldsiainsordo. com 

•:EARfNG V'^KT'^ 

May 20, 20n 

Via Federal Express 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Federal Aviation Adrninistration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW, Suite 2W1000 

Wilbur Wright Building 

Washington, D. C. 20591 

'•Or-'-- ' 

CO 

fle; Dean International, IncJFDMS No. FAA-2011-0069 

Dear Sir/Madam: 

Enclosed for filing in the above-referenced matter please find an original and one 

copy of the parties' Agreed Proposed Procedural Schedule. I have also enclosed an 

extra copy for time stamping and return to me in the envelope provided. 

Very truly yours, 

Stuart A. Goldstein /hs 

pc: Christopher R. Stevenson, Esq. 

w/encl. 
05/25/2011 16 34 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS 12002/002 

UNITED STATES. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D. C 

IN THE MATTER OF 

DEAN INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-0069 

, • • '••••A -

-T l.-Jrt)l -•;.,,•..• 

•• '. . :.- lit 

••:^.AR?K?GOi:?CKP-: 

AGREED PROPOSED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE 

Pursuant to the Court's Order Establishing Procedures dated AphI 25, 2011, 

counsel for the parties have conferred and agreed to the following procedural schedule; 

+ Discovery Cut-Off: 

-^ Filing stipulations, witness lists 

and summaries: 

^ Exchanging exhibits: 

+ Stipulations: 

•> Settlement Status 

•)• Hearing date: 

•^ Hearing Location: 

September 1, 2011 

October 14, 2011 

October 14, 2011 

November 1, 2011 

November 1, 2011 

November 15-17,2011 

Miami, Florida 

Respectfully submitted, 

Stuart A. Goldstein, Esq. 

Law Offices of Goldstein & Sordo 

9350 South Dixie Highway, 10th Floor 

Miami, FL 33156 

T: (305)670-1222 

F: (305)670-7065 

By 

Stuart A. Goldstein 

Attorney for Respondent 

Christopher R. Stevenson, Esq. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

P. O. Box 20636 

T: (404) 305-5200 

F: (404)305-5223 

-P^rj Christopher R. Stevenson 

Attorney for the Administrator