alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit A

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21808-1 Filed:08/10/22 Entered:08/10/22 11:59:30 Desc:

Exhibit Order Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21808-1 Filed:08/10/22 Entered:08/10/22 11:59:30 Desc:

Exhibit Order Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21808-1 Filed:08/10/22 Entered:08/10/22 11:59:30 Desc:

Exhibit Order Page 3 of 3
# United State s Court of Appea ls
For the S eventh Cir cuit Chicago, Illin ois 60604 July 31, 2002 Before Hon. WILLI

AM J. BAUE R, Circui t Judge Hon. RIC HARD A. P OSNER, Circui t Judge Hon. MIC HAEL S. KA NNE, Circui t Judge

CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF ST. LOUIS, ] Appeal from the United INCORPORATED, CIGNA HEALTHCARE ] States District Court for OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED, and CIGNA ] the Northern District of CORPORATION, ] Illinois, Eastern Division. Plaintiffs-Appellants, ] ] No. 01 C 5130 No. 02-1278 v. ] ] Ruben Castillo, TIMOTHY N. KAISER, M.D., In his ] Judge. capacity as class representative in ] a class action filed in the Circuit ] Court, 3d Judicial Circuit, Madison ] County, Illinois, MIDWEST NEOPAD ] ASSOCIATES, LIMITED, NORTHWESTERN ] MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et al., ] Defendants-Appellees. ]

The followin g are befo re the c ourt:
1. DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF CORRECTED OPINION , filed on July 9, 2002, by counsel for appellees.
2. APPELLANTS’ RESPONSE TO APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF CORRECTED OPINION, filed on July 26, 2002, by counsel for appellants. IT IS ORD ERED that the APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF CORRECTED OPINION is GRANTED . The Court amends its opinion datedAppeal No. 02-1278 Page 2

June 21, 2002, to the extent that the phrase “ including one of the n amed plaintiffs” on page 10 of the slip opinion is deleted, so that the sentence shall read as follows:

We are no t certain that he will; h is actionsin certif ying a class even though many of its members were basing their claims on contracts containing arbitration clauses, in allowing discovery on the merits to proceed before ruling on arbitrability, and in delaying as long as h e has rulin g on that qu estion (C IGNA moved the state judge for an order to arbitrate in July 2001, almost a year ago), do make us wonder whether federal arbitration rights may not be a second -order

concer n for him

.
# Official Journal C 65/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 65 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 657 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 65

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 657 February 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 65/01 | Commission Decision of 5 November 2021 instructing the Central Administrator of the European Union Transaction Log to enter changes to the national allocation tables of Belgium, Czechia, Estonia, Greece, France, Croatia, Cyprus, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia and Sweden into the European Union Transaction Log | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 65/01

Commission Decision of 5 November 2021 instructing the Central Administrator of the European Union Transaction Log to enter changes to the national allocation tables of Belgium, Czechia, Estonia, Greece, France, Croatia, Cyprus, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia and Sweden into the European Union Transaction Log

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
~ 

CITYoF PRESCOTT 

L1"7~~J lZOf~LLt0 ~ul1! 

N w 

Office of the Mayor 

201 South Cortez Street 

Prescott, Arizona 86303 

December 24, 2015 

Michael Huerta, Administrator 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Re: Petition of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd., for an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 110.2 

Dear Administrator Huerta: 

I am writing to urge your action with respect to granting an exemption to the definition of a"Commuter 

Operation" that was filed by Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. ("Great Lakes"), to allow the use of 19-seat 

aircraft. 

Prescott, Arizona, which receives Essential Air Service via the Prescott Municipal Airport (PRC), has 

suffered seat capacity losses and diminished reliability since the new FAR Part 121 pilot experience 

requirements were instituted in 2013. We believe granting of the exemption for Great Lakes will restore 

the quality of commercial air service to Prescott and other small communities, without jeopardizing 

safety for the flying public. 

The effect of the 2013 rule change has been to diminish commercial air service in the Prescott region, 

reducing flights and the seats needed to grow jobs, stimulate economic activity, and transport physicians 

and other professionals to and from our community. It also reduced Federal Airport Improvement 

Program funding necessary to implement long-awaited airport safety improvements. 

Since Great Lakes began operating their aircraft in a 9-seat configuration, the communities served have 

lost over 380,000 seats. A BE-1900D operation utilizing 19 seats will allow Great Lakes to reinstate seat 

capacity, and reverse the adverse economic impacts communities have experienced due to passenger 

enplanement reductions. The exemption will also support the congressionally mandated goals of the 

Essential Air Service Program. 

We strongly urge your action in granting Great Lakes an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 110.2 that will 

allow the use of 19 seats. 

Thank you for your interest and support of commercial air service to Prescott, Arizona, and like 

communities, through granting of the requested exemption. 

Sincerely, 

}~• ~i~ 

Harr B.Oberg 

Mayor
# FILED
February 5, 1999 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk 

## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

STATE OF T

ENNESSEE, ex rel. ) DOUG SIZEMORE, Commissioner ) of Commerce and I

nsurance for the ) State of Tennessee, ) ) Petitioner, ) Davidson Chancery ) No. 92-1120-I(II) VS. ) ) UNITED PHYSICIANS IN SURANCE ) Appeal No. RISK RETENTION GROU P, ) 01A01-9706-CH-00253

) Respondent. ) ) Insured: Billy C. Joh nson, M.D. ) Claimant: Estate

of Blendora Ann E

chols ) 

## CONCURRING OPIN

ION

I concur with the co urt’s op inion. Insurance c ompanies have the ri

ght to assume that the risk they undertake will not later be en larged by th e courts. See Schultz v. Tennessee Farmers Mut. Ins. Co. , 218 Tenn. 465, 474 , 40 4 S.W.2d 480, 484 (1966). Accordingly, the courts are not at liberty to rewrite policies of insurance to provide coverage w

here nocoverage was intended

. See Spears v. Commer cial Ins. Co. , 866 S.W.2d 544, 548 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1993). Dr. Johnson did not contract for prior acts coverage whenhe purchased his UPI insurance policy. Accordingly, UPI never provided cover

age for claims suc

h as Blendora Ann E

chols.

____________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
Amended Consulting Agreement - Todd Govig



 
Exhibit
4.1(j) 
 
Amendment 1 to Consulting Agreement

Between Calypte Biomedical Corporation and Todd Govig 
 
This Agreement amends and modifies the Consulting Agreements between Calypte Biomedical Corporation (“Calypte” or
the “Company”) and Management Recruiters of Scottsdale/Todd Govig (“Consultant”) and is effective as of April 17, 2003. 
 
Whereas, the Company desires to change the payment terms on the contract for certain consulting services performed in 2002 and Consultant is agreeable to
such modification. 
 
Now therefore, in consideration of the
premises and mutual promises set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 

	 	1.	 	The Company acknowledges that as of April 17, 2003 it owes Consultant certain amounts for services rendered, payable in cash. It will now convert this payment to
stock issuable to Consultant individually, or his designee, a total of 900,000 shares in full payment due under the contract and related notice period. 

 

	 	2.	 	In consideration for this modification, the Company agrees to register the shares with the upcoming S-8 filing during April 2003. If the filing occurs after April,
Consultant has the option to accept only cash. 

 

	 	3.	 	All other terms and conditions of the 2002 Consultant Agreements remain unchanged. 

 

	
	 Consultant:
	 	 	 	 CALYPTE BIOMEDICAL
CORPORATION

	
	 /s/    TODD
GOVIG        

	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/    RICHARD D.
BROUNSTEIN        


	 Todd Govig
	 	 	 	 	 	 Richard D. Brounstein
 Executive Vice President, CFO


 

32
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10348]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, May 19, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW, Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance matters.

CONTRACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-10348 Filed 4-21-00; 11:34 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 8 September 2005

in Case C-303/04 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Voghera): Lidl Italia Srl v Comune di Stradella (1)

(Technical standards and regulations - Directive 98/34/EC - Concept of ‘technical regulation’ - Non-biodegradable cotton buds)

(2005/C 281/08)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-303/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Tribunale di Voghera (District Court of Voghera) (Italy), made by decision of 1 July 2004, received at the Court on 16 July 2004, in the proceedings between Lidl Italia Srl and Comune di Stradella — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur) and J. Klučka, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 8 September 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

----

(1)OJ C 228 of 11.09.2004.

----
#### § 791.20 Implementation of the Interagency Statement.

The Statement describes the official policy of the NCUA with respect to the use of supervisory guidance in the supervisory process. The Statement is binding on the NCUA.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-39 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
3.4



STATE
OF DELAWARECERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENTOFCERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION



Emerald
Medical Applications Corp., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware does hereby certify:



FIRST:
That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Emerald Medical Applications Corp. (the “Corporation”) resolutions
were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of said Corporation, declaring said amendment
to be advisable and based upon the written consent of stockholders of said Corporation holding a majority of the outstanding shares
of common stock for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:



RESOLVED,
that the Certificate of Incorporation of this Corporation be amended by changing the Article thereof numbered “FIRST”
so that, as amended, said Article shall be and read as follows:



FIRST:
The name of the Corporation is: Virtual Crypto Technologies Inc.



SECOND:
That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, and based upon the written consent of holders of a majority
of the shares of common of said Corporation in accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,
the necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.



THIRD:
That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware.



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed this 25th day of January 2018.



|By:    | /s/
    Ahmed Alimi         | 
|------ | --------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Ahmed
    Alimi             | 
|Title: | Chief
    Executive Officer |
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re FLC Parkway LP

Appellate case number: 01-21-00379-CV

Trial court case number: 21-DCV-282949

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

Relator, FLC Parkway LP, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial 

court’s July 9, 2021 order granting a motion to expunge lis pendens. Relator has also filed a motion 

to stay enforcement of the trial court’s July 9, 2021 order.

The Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus from real parties in 

interest, Lake Olympia One Owner, LP, Lake Olympia One Owner GP, LLC, Lake Olympia Land 

GP, LLC, Lake Olympia Two, Ltd., Lake Olympia Three, Ltd., Frank Liu, Sage Interests, Inc., 

and Kirby Title, LLC. This response shall be filed within 30 days of the date of this order. A 

reply to the response, if any, should be filed within 20 days of the filing of the response.

Relator’s motion to stay is granted. The trial court’s order of July 9, 2021, is stayed

pending disposition of the petition for writ of mandamus.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___Justice Peter Kelly______________________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___July 13, 2021__________
§ 121.621 Alternate airport for destination: Flag operations. ( a ) No person may dispatch an airplane under IFR or over-the-top unless he lists at least one alternate airport for each destination airport in the dispatch release, unless— ( 1 ) The flight is scheduled for not more than 6 hours and, for at least 1 hour before and 1 hour after the estimated time of arrival at the destination airport, the appropriate weather reports or forecasts, or any combination of them, indicate the ceiling will be: ( i ) At least 1,500 feet above the lowest circling MDA, if a circling approach is required and authorized for that airport; or
( ii ) At least 1,500 feet above the lowest published instrument approach minimum or 2,000 feet above the airport elevation, whichever is greater; and
( iii ) The visibility at that airport will be at least 3 miles, or 2 miles more than the lowest applicable visibility minimums, whichever is greater, for the instrument approach procedures to be used at the destination airport; or
( 2 ) The flight is over a route approved without an available alternate airport for a particular destination airport and the airplane has enough fuel to meet the requirements of § 121.641(b) or § 121.645(c).
( b ) For the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the weather conditions at the alternate airport must meet the requirements of the certificate holder's operations specifications.
( c ) No person may dispatch a flight unless he lists each required alternate airport in the dispatch release.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19222, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-159, 45 FR 41594, June 19, 1980; Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2614, Jan. 26, 1996]
§ 614.4945 Force placement of flood insurance. ( a ) *Notice and purchase of coverage.* If a System institution, or a servicer acting on behalf of the System institution, determines at any time during the term of a designated loan, that the building or mobile home and any personal property securing the designated loan is not covered by flood insurance or is covered by flood insurance in an amount less than the amount required under § 614.4930, then the System institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall notify the borrower that the borrower should obtain flood insurance, at the borrower's expense, in an amount at least equal to the amount required under § 614.4930, for the remaining term of the loan. If the borrower fails to obtain flood insurance within 45 days after notification, then the System institution, or its servicer, shall purchase insurance on the borrower's behalf. The System institution, or its servicer, may charge the borrower for the cost of premiums and fees incurred in purchasing the insurance, including premiums or fees incurred for coverage beginning on the date on which flood insurance coverage lapsed or did not provide a sufficient coverage amount.
( b ) *Termination of force-placed insurance* — ( 1 ) *Termination and refund.* Within 30 days of receipt by a System institution, or by a servicer acting on its behalf, of a confirmation of a borrower's existing flood insurance coverage, the System institution, or its servicer, shall: ( i ) Notify the insurance provider to terminate any insurance purchased by the System institution, or its servicer, under paragraph (a) of this section; and
( ii ) Refund to the borrower all premiums paid by the borrower for any insurance purchased by the System institution, or by its servicer, under paragraph (a) of this section during any period during which the borrower's flood insurance coverage and the insurance coverage purchased by the System institution, or its servicer, were each in effect, and any related fees charged to the borrower with respect to the insurance purchased by the System institution, or its servicer, during such period.
( 2 ) *Sufficiency of demonstration.* For purposes of confirming a borrower's existing flood insurance coverage under paragraph (b) of this section, a System institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, shall accept from the borrower an insurance policy declarations page that includes the existing flood insurance policy number and the identity of, and contact information for, the insurance company or agent.
# Official Journal L 154/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 154 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5911 June 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 154

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5911 June 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2016/920 of 20 May 2016 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offences | 1 |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/921 of 10 June 2016 laying down further temporary exceptional support measures for producers of certain fruit and vegetables | 3 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/922 of 10 June 2016 amending Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 as regards the list of third countries, territories or parts thereof from which the introduction into the Union of fresh meat is authorised (
  1
  ) | 21 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/923 of 10 June 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 25 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2016/920 of 20 May 2016 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offences

1

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/921 of 10 June 2016 laying down further temporary exceptional support measures for producers of certain fruit and vegetables

3

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/922 of 10 June 2016 amending Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 as regards the list of third countries, territories or parts thereof from which the introduction into the Union of fresh meat is authorised (
  1
  )

1

21

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/923 of 10 June 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

25

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 280 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3768 

[Report No. 108–493] 

To expand the Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve, Florida. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2004 

Mr. CRENSHAW (for himself and Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

MAY 17, 2004 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on February 4, 2004] 

A BILL 

To expand the Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve, 

Florida. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Timucuan Ecological 

5 and Historic Preserve Boundary Revision Act of 2004’’. 
2 

•HR 3768 RH 

1 SEC. 2. REVISION OF BOUNDARY OF TIMUCUAN ECOLOGI2 CAL AND HISTORIC PRESERVE, FLORIDA. 

3 Section 201(a) of Public Law 100–249 (16 U.S.C. 

4 698n) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is 

6 hereby’’ and inserting the following: 

7 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There is’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(2) MODIFICATION OF BOUNDARY.— 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the land 

12 described in paragraph (1), the Preserve shall in13 clude approximately 8.5 acres of land located in 

14 Nassau County, Florida, as generally depicted 

15 on the map entitled ‘Timucuan Ecological and 

16 Historic Preserve American Beach Adjustment’, 

17 numbered 006/80012 and dated June 2003. 

18 ‘‘(B) DUTIES OF SECRETARY.—The Sec19 retary of the Interior shall— 

20 ‘‘(i) revise the boundaries of the Pre21 serve so as to encompass the land described 

22 in subparagraph (A); and 

23 ‘‘(ii) maintain the map described in 

24 subparagraph (A) on file and available for 

25 public inspection in the appropriate offices 

26 of the National Park Service.’’. 

Union Calendar No. 280 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3768 

[Report No. 108–493] 

A BILL 

To expand the Timucuan Ecological and Historic 

Preserve, Florida. 

MAY 17, 2004 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union,
#### William H. Cadwell *vs.*The Connecticut Company.

First Judicial District.

Argued October 6th

decided December 17th, 1915.

Action to recover damages for constructing and operating a street railway in front of the plaintiff’s premises without authority of law, and for an injunction, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in Hartford County, *Burpee,*Jfacts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiff.

*No error.*

*Charles H. Mitchell,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*John T. Robinson,*for the appellee (defendant).

Opinion filed with the clerk of the Superior Court in Hartford County.