##### Table of Contents

---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---



FORM 10-Q



---



(Mark One)



| | x |  | Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 or



| |  ̈ |  | Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



For the transition period from
 to



Commission file number 0-16518



---



WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its
charter)



---



|                                                               |  |                                        
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Georgia                                                        |  | 58-1678709                             
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|                                                               | 
|6200 The Corners Pkwy.,Norcross, Georgia                       |  | 30092-3365                             
|(Address of principal executive offices)                       |  | (Zip Code)                             
|                                                               | 
|Registrants telephone number, including area code             |  | (770) 449-7800                         



---

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  x    No ̈



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ̈No  x



---



---

##### Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS



Certain statements contained in this Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund II (the
Partnership) other than historical facts may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements include, in
particular, statements about our plans, strategies, and prospects and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated.
Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will,
expect, intend, anticipate, estimate, believe, continue, or other similar words. Specifically, among others, we consider statements concerning projections of future operating
results and cash flows, our ability to meet future obligations, and the amount and timing of future distributions to limited partners to be forward-looking statements.



Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date that this report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Neither the Partnership nor the general partners make any representations or warranties (expressed or implied) about the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ
materially from any forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q, and we do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.



Any such forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties,
and other factors and are based on a number of assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive, and market conditions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately. To the extent
that our assumptions differ from actual results, our ability to meet such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations; provide distributions to limited partners; and maintain the value of our real
estate properties, may be significantly hindered. Following are some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented in certain forward-looking
statements:



General economic risks



| |  |  | Adverse changes in general or local economic conditions; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Adverse economic conditions affecting the particular industry of one or more tenants in properties owned by our joint ventures.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Enterprise risks



| |  |  | Our dependency on Wells Capital, Inc. (Wells Capital) and its affiliates and their key personnel for various administrative services; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Wells Capitals ability to attract and retain high quality personnel who can provide acceptable service levels and generate economies of scale over time.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Real estate risks



| |  |  | Ability to achieve appropriate occupancy levels resulting in rental amounts sufficient to cover operating costs;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Supply of or demand for similar or competing rentable space, which may adversely impact retaining or obtaining new tenants upon lease expiration at acceptable rental amounts;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Tenant ability or willingness to satisfy obligations relating to our existing lease agreements;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page 2



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | Increases in property operating expenses, including property taxes, insurance, and other costs not recoverable from tenants;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Ability to secure adequate insurance at reasonable and appropriate rates to avoid uninsured losses or losses in excess of insured amounts;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Discovery of previously undetected environmentally hazardous or other undetected adverse conditions at our properties;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Ability to fund foreseen and unforeseen capital expenditures, including those related to tenant build-out projects, tenant improvements, and lease-up costs, out of operating cash
flow or net property sale proceeds; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Ability to sell a property when desirable at an acceptable return, including the ability of the purchaser to satisfy any and all closing conditions.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Other operational risks



| |  |  | Our reliance on Wells Management Company, Inc. (Wells Management) or third parties to manage our properties;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Increases in our administrative operating expenses, including increased expenses associated with operating as a public company in the current regulatory environment;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Ability to comply with governmental, tax, real estate, environmental, and zoning laws or regulations and funding the related costs of compliance; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Actions of our joint venture partners including potential bankruptcy, business interests differing from ours, or other actions that may adversely impact the operations of joint
ventures.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page 3



---

##### Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



TABLE OF CONTENTS



|         |  |                       |  |                                                                                                                         |  |         
|-------- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------
|         |  |                       |  |                                                                                                                         |  | Page No.
|PART I.  |  | FINANCIAL INFORMATION |  |                                                                                                                        
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 1.               |  | Financial Statements                                                                                                    |  |         
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  |                       |  | Balance SheetsJune 30, 2005 (unaudited) and December 31, 2004                                                          |  | 6       
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  |                       |  | Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 (unaudited) and 2004 (unaudited)       |  | 7       
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  |                       |  | Statements of Partners Capital for the Year Ended December 31, 2004 and the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 (unaudited) |  | 8       
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  |                       |  | Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 (unaudited) and 2004 (unaudited)                        |  | 9       
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  |                       |  | Condensed Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)                                                                     |  | 10      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 2.               |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations                                   |  | 14      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 3.               |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk                                                              |  | 20      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 4.               |  | Controls and Procedures                                                                                                 |  | 20      
|         |  |                      
|PART II. |  | OTHER INFORMATION     |  |                                                                                                                        
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 1.               |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                                                       |  | 21      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 2.               |  | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds                                                             |  | 21      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 3.               |  | Defaults Upon Senior Securities                                                                                         |  | 21      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 4.               |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                                                     |  | 21      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 5.               |  | Other Information                                                                                                       |  | 21      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 6.               |  | Exhibits                                                                                                                |  | 21      



Page 4



---

##### Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



PART I.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



The information furnished in our accompanying balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations, partners capital, and cash flows reflects all adjustments that are, in our opinion, necessary for a fair and consistent
presentation of the aforementioned financial statements.



The financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to our financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in this report on Form 10-Q and with our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. Our results of operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results expected for the full year.



Page 5



---

##### Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



BALANCE SHEETS



ASSETS



|                                     |  |                           |            |                  |   |           
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------- | ---------- | ---------------- | - | ----------
|                                     |  | June 30, 2005 (unaudited) |            | December 31,2004
|Investment in Fund II and Fund II-OW |  | $                         | 10,411,501 |                  | $ | 10,696,518
|Cash and cash equivalents            |  |                           | 116,668    |                  |   | 116,506   
|Due from Fund II and Fund II-OW      |  |                           | 7,332,855  |                  |   | 7,130,720 
|                                     |  |                           |            |                  |   |           
|Total assets                         |  | $                         | 17,861,024 |                  | $ | 17,943,744
|                                     |  |                           |            |                  |   |           



LIABILITIES AND
PARTNERS CAPITAL



|                                             |  |   |            |  |   |           
|-------------------------------------------- |  | - | ---------- |  | - | ----------
|LIABILITIES:                                 |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Partnership distributions payable            |  | $ | 8,135      |  | $ | 8,135     
|                                             |  |  
|PARTNERS CAPITAL:                           |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Limited partners:                            |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Class A108,572 units issued and outstanding |  |   | 17,663,992 |  |   | 17,476,652
|Class B30,221 units issued and outstanding  |  |   | 188,897    |  |   | 458,957   
|General partners                             |  |   | 0          |  |   | 0         
|                                             |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total partners capital                      |  |   | 17,852,889 |  |   | 17,935,609
|                                             |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total liabilities and partners capital      |  | $ | 17,861,024 |  | $ | 17,943,744
|                                             |  |   |            |  |   |           



See accompanying notes.



Page 6



---

##### Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)



|                                                 |  |                             |          |   |                           |   |          |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------- | -------- | - | ------------------------- | - | -------- | ---- |  | - | -------- | - |  | - | -------- | -
|                                                 |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |          |   | Six Months Ended June 30, |  
|                                                 |  | 2005                        |          |   | 2004                      |   |          | 2005 |  |   | 2004     |  
|EQUITY IN LOSS OF FUND II AND FUND II-OW         |  | $                           | (46,506  | ) |                           | $ | (201,590 | )    |  | $ | (82,882  | ) |  | $ | (358,838 | )
|                                                 |  |                             |          |  
|INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME                        |  |                             | 101      |   |                           |   | 288      |      |  |   | 162      |   |  |   | 327      |  
|                                                 |  |                             |          |   |                           |   |          |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|NET LOSS                                         |  | $                           | (46,405  | ) |                           | $ | (201,302 | )    |  | $ | (82,720  | ) |  | $ | (358,511 | )
|                                                 |  |                             |          |   |                           |   |          |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|NET INCOME (LOSS) ALLOCATED TO LIMITED PARTNERS: |  |                             |          |   |                           |   |          |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|CLASS A                                          |  | $                           | 88,385   |   |                           | $ | (201,302 | )    |  | $ | 187,340  |   |  | $ | (358,511 | )
|                                                 |  |                             |          |   |                           |   |          |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|CLASS B                                          |  | $                           | (134,790 | ) |                           | $ | 0        |      |  | $ | (270,060 | ) |  | $ | 0        |  
|                                                 |  |                             |          |   |                           |   |          |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|NET INCOME (LOSS) PER LIMITED PARTNER UNIT:      |  |                             |          |   |                           |   |          |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|CLASS A                                          |  | $                           | 0.81     |   |                           | $ | (1.85    | )    |  | $ | 1.73     |   |  | $ | (3.30    | )
|                                                 |  |                             |          |   |                           |   |          |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|CLASS B                                          |  | $                           | (4.46    | ) |                           | $ | 0.00     |      |  | $ | (8.94    | ) |  | $ | 0.00     |  
|                                                 |  |                             |          |   |                           |   |          |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  



|See | accompanying notes.
|--- | -------------------



Page 7



---

##### Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS CAPITAL



FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

AND THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 (unaudited)



|                           |  |                  |  |         |                 |   |                       |        |         |   |          |   |  |   |   |  |   |            |  
|-------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | ------- | --------------- | - | --------------------- | ------ | ------- | - | -------- | - |  | - | - |  | - | ---------- | -
|                           |  | Limited Partners |  |         | GeneralPartners |   | TotalPartnersCapital |       
|                           |  | Class A          |  |         | Class B         |   |                       |       
|                           |  | Units            |  | Amounts |                 |   | Units                 |        | Amounts |   |          |  
|BALANCE, December 31, 2003 |  | 108,572          |  | $       | 17,729,491      |   |                       | 30,221 |         | $ | 0        |   |  | $ | 0 |  | $ | 17,729,491 |  
|                           |  |                  |  |         |                 |  
|Net income (loss)          |  | 0                |  |         | (252,839        | ) |                       | 0      |         |   | 458,957  |   |  |   | 0 |  |   | 206,118    |  
|                           |  |                  |  |         |                 |   |                       |        |         |   |          |   |  |   |   |  |   |            |  
|BALANCE, December 31, 2004 |  | 108,572          |  |         | 17,476,652      |   |                       | 30,221 |         |   | 458,957  |   |  |   | 0 |  |   | 17,935,609 |  
|                           |  |                  |  |         |                 |  
|Net income (loss)          |  | 0                |  |         | 187,340         |   |                       | 0      |         |   | (270,060 | ) |  |   | 0 |  |   | (82,720    | )
|                           |  |                  |  |         |                 |   |                       |        |         |   |          |   |  |   |   |  |   |            |  
|BALANCE, June 30, 2005     |  | 108,572          |  | $       | 17,663,992      |   |                       | 30,221 |         | $ | 188,897  |   |  | $ | 0 |  | $ | 17,852,889 |  
|                           |  |                  |  |         |                 |   |                       |        |         |   |          |   |  |   |   |  |   |            |  



See accompanying notes.



Page 8



---

##### Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)



|                                                                                |  |                           |         |   |      |   |          |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ------- | - | ---- | - | -------- | -
|                                                                                |  | Six Months Ended June 30, |        
|                                                                                |  | 2005                      |         |   | 2004 |  
|CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                                           |  |                           |         |   |      |   |          |  
|Net loss                                                                        |  | $                         | (82,720 | ) |      | $ | (358,511 | )
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |                           |         |   |      |   |          |  
|Equity in income of Fund II and Fund II-OW                                      |  |                           | 82,882  |   |      |   | 358,838  |  
|                                                                                |  |                           |         |   |      |   |          |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                       |  |                           | 162     |   |      |   | 327      |  
|                                                                                |  |                          
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period                                  |  |                           | 116,506 |   |      |   | 130,245  |  
|                                                                                |  |                           |         |   |      |   |          |  
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period                                        |  | $                         | 116,668 |   |      | $ | 130,572  |  
|                                                                                |  |                           |         |   |      |   |          |  



See accompanying notes.



Page 9



---

##### Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



JUNE 30, 2005 (unaudited)



|1. | ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
|-- | -------------------------



Wells Real Estate Fund II (the Partnership) is a public limited partnership organized on June 23, 1986 under the laws of the state of Georgia with Leo F.
Wells III and Wells Capital, Inc. (Wells Capital), a Georgia corporation, serving as its general partners (collectively, the General Partners). Wells Capital is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. Leo
F. Wells, III is the president and sole director of Wells Capital and the sole owner of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. The Partnership has two classes of limited partnership interests, Class A and Class B Units. Limited partners may vote to, among
other things, (a) amend the partnership agreement, subject to certain limitations; (b) change the business purpose or investment objectives of the Partnership; and (c) remove a general partner. A majority vote on any of the above-described matters
will bind the Partnership, without the concurrence of the General Partners. Each limited partnership unit has equal voting rights, regardless of class.



On September 8, 1986, the Partnership commenced an offering of up to $50,000,000 of Class A or Class B limited partnership units ($250.00 per unit) pursuant to a
Registration Statement filed on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933. The offering was terminated on September 7, 1988, at which time the Partnership had sold approximately 139,793 Class A and Class B Units representing capital contributions
of $34,948,250.



The Partnership owns interests in all of its real estate
assets through a joint venture, Fund II and Fund II-OW, which owns interests in real estate assets both directly and through joint ventures with other entities affiliated with the General Partners. During the periods presented, the Partnership owned
interests in the following joint ventures (the Joint Ventures) and properties:



|                                                                      |  |                                                                                                     |  |                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Joint Venture                                                         |  | Joint Venture Partners                                                                              |  | Properties                                                                             
|Fund II and Fund II-OW (Fund II-IIOW Associates)                    |  |    Wells Real Estate Fund II    Wells Real Estate Fund II-OW                                      |  | 1. Louis Rose Building A two-story office building located in Charlotte, North Carolina
|Fund I and Fund II Tucker (Fund I-II Tucker Associates)             |  |    Wells Real Estate Fund I    Fund II-IIOW Associates                                            |  | 2. Heritage Place(1) A commercial office complex located in Tucker, Georgia            
|Fund II and Fund III Associates (Fund II-III Associates)            |  |    Fund II-IIOW Associates    Wells Real Estate Fund III, L.P.                                    |  | 3. Boeing at the Atrium A
four-story office building located in Houston, Texas         
|                                                                      |  |                                                                                                     |  | 4. Brookwood Grill(2) A restaurant located in Roswell, Georgia                         
|Fund II, III, VI and VII Associates (Fund II-III-VI-VII Associates) |  |    Fund II-III Associates    Wells Real Estate Fund VI, L.P.    Wells Real Estate Fund VII, L.P. |  | 5. Holcomb Bridge Property(2) An office/retail center located in
Roswell, Georgia      



| | (1) | The retail portion of this property (approximately 30%) was sold in April 2003.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | These properties were sold in July 2004.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------



Page 10



---

##### Table of Contents

Wells Real Estate Fund II-OW, Wells Real Estate Fund III, L.P, Wells Real Estate Fund VI, L.P, and Wells Real Estate Fund
VII, L.P. are affiliated with the Partnership through one or more common general partners. Each of the properties described above was acquired on an all-cash basis. For further information regarding the Joint Ventures and foregoing properties, refer
to the Partnerships Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.



On
July 1, 2004, Fund II-III Associates and Fund II-III-VI-VII Associates, collectively, sold Brookwood Grill and the Holcomb Bridge Property to an unrelated third party (the Purchaser) for a gross sale price of $9,500,000. As a result of
the sale of Brookwood Grill, the Partnership received net sale proceeds of approximately $1,385,000 and was allocated a gain of approximately $455,000. As a result of the sale of the Holcomb Bridge Property, the Partnership received net sale
proceeds of approximately $953,000 and was allocated a gain of approximately $279,000, of which approximately $22,000 was deferred. The deferred gain represents the Partnerships pro-rata allocation of maximum exposure under an eighteen-month
rental guarantee provided to the Purchaser in connection with the sale. In June 2005, the Purchaser sold the Holcomb Bridge Property and as a result the Partnership is no longer obligated under the terms of the rental guarantee. As of June 30, 2005,
the Partnership recognized the remaining deferred gain of approximately $15,550.



|2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|-- | ------------------------------------------



Basis of Presentation



The financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X, and in accordance with such rules and regulations, do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of
the General Partners, the statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments that are of a normal and recurring nature and necessary to fairly and consistently present the results for such periods. Results for interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of full-year results. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes included in the Partnerships Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.



Investment in Joint Ventures



The Partnership does not have control over the operations of the Joint Ventures; however, it
does exercise significant influence. Approval by the Partnership as well as the other joint venture partners is required for any major decision or any action that would materially affect the Joint Ventures, or their real property investments.
Accordingly, the Partnerships investments in the Joint Ventures are recorded using the equity method of accounting, whereby original investments are recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for contributions, distributions, and net income
(loss) attributable to the Partnership. Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreements, all income and distributions are allocated to joint venture partners in accordance with their respective ownership interests. Distributions of net cash
from operations are distributed to the joint venture partners on a quarterly basis.



The Partnership adopted FIN 46(R) effective March 31, 2004. The Partnership owns interests in certain unconsolidated joint venture partnerships (see Note 4). The joint venture partners of the Partnerships unconsolidated joint ventures
in which the Partnership owns an interest have disproportionate voting rights for certain major decisions relative to their obligations to absorb expected losses and rights to receive residual returns of such ventures. However, management has
evaluated such joint ventures and has determined that they are not variable interest entities under the provisions of FIN 46(R) because not substantially all of the activities of the joint ventures are conducted on behalf of a joint venture partner
with disproportionately fewer voting rights. Accordingly, the adoption of FIN 46(R) did not result in the consolidation of any previously unconsolidated entities.



Page 11



---

##### Table of Contents

Distributions of Net Cash from Operations



Net cash from operations, if available, is generally distributed to limited partners quarterly. In accordance with the partnership
agreement, such distributions are paid first to each limited partner holding Class A Units until he has received an 8% per annum return on his adjusted capital contributions, as defined. Net cash from operations is then distributed to each limited
partner holding Class B Units until he has received an 8% per annum return on his adjusted capital contributions, as defined. Any excess net cash from operations would then be distributed to the General Partners until they have received 10% of the
total distributions for the year. Thereafter, net cash from operations is distributed 90% to the limited partners and 10% to the General Partners.



Allocations of Net Income, Net Loss, and Gain on Sale



For the purpose of determining allocations per the partnership agreement, net income is defined as net income recognized by the Partnership, excluding deductions for
depreciation, amortization, cost recovery, interest expense, and the gain on the sale of assets. Net income, as defined, of the Partnership will be allocated each year in the same proportions that net cash from operations is distributed to the
partners. To the extent the Partnerships net income in any year exceeds net cash from operations, it will be allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the General Partners.



Net loss, depreciation, and amortization deductions for each fiscal year will be allocated as follows: (a) 99% to the limited partners
holding Class B Units and 1% to the General Partners until their capital accounts are reduced to zero; (b) then to any partner having a positive balance in his capital account in an amount not to exceed such positive balance; and (c) thereafter to
the General Partners.



Gains on the sale or exchange of the Partnerships
properties will be allocated as follows: (a) first to partners having negative capital accounts, if any, until all negative capital accounts have been restored to zero; (b) then to the limited partners in proportion to and to the extent of the
excess of (i) each limited partners adjusted capital contribution, plus a cumulative 12% per annum return on his adjusted capital contribution, less the sum of all prior distributions of cash flow from operations previously made to such
limited partner, over (ii) such limited partners capital account balance as of the sale date, subject to the requirement to initially allocate gain on sale to limited partners holding Class B Units until they have been allocated an amount
equal to the net cash from operations previously received by limited partners holding Class A Units on a per unit basis; (c) then to the General Partners in proportion to and to the extent of the excess of (i) each general partners adjusted
capital contribution, over (ii) such general partners capital account balance as of the sale date; and (d) thereafter 85% to the limited partners and 15% to the General Partners.



|3. | RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|-- | --------------------------



Management and Leasing Fees



Wells Management Company, Inc. (Wells Management), an affiliate of the General Partners, is entitled to compensation for the management and leasing of the
Partnerships properties owned through the Joint Venture equal to (a) of the gross revenues collected monthly, 3% for management services and 3% for leasing services, plus a separate fee for the one-time lease-up of newly constructed properties
in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arms-length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties or (b) in the case of commercial properties which are leased on a
long-term net basis (ten or more years), 1% of the gross revenues except for initial leasing fees equal to 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term. Management and leasing fees are paid by the Joint Venture and,
accordingly, included in equity in loss of Fund II-IIOW Associates in the accompanying statements of operations. The Partnerships share of management and leasing fees and lease acquisition costs incurred through the Fund II-IIOW Associates is
$22,807 and $31,295 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $45,532 and $59,052 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.



Page 12



---

##### Table of Contents

Administration Reimbursements



Wells Capital, one of the General Partners, and Wells Management perform certain administrative services for the Partnership and the Joint
Venture, relating to accounting and other partnership administration, and incur the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among various other entities affiliated with the General Partners based on time spent on each fund by individual
administrative personnel. In the opinion of the General Partners, this allocation is a reasonable estimation of such expenses. The administrative charges related to the Partnership are recorded by Fund II-IIOW Associates and, therefore, included in
equity loss of Fund II-IIOW Associates in the accompanying statements of operations. Fund II-IIOW Associates reimbursed Wells Capital and Wells Management $62,921 and $62,922 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and
$127,133 and $116,051 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, on behalf of the Partnership.



|4. | INVESTMENT IN FUND II-IIOW ASSOCIATES
|-- | -------------------------------------



Summary of OperationsFund II-IIOW Associates



Condensed financial information for Fund II-IIOW Associates for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, is presented below:



|                            |  |                             |        |      |                           |         |                           |  |   |          |   |      |   |        |  |   |        |  |   |         |   |  |   |          |  
|--------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ------ | ---- | ------------------------- | ------- | ------------------------- |  | - | -------- | - | ---- | - | ------ |  | - | ------ |  | - | ------- | - |  | - | -------- | -
|Total Revenues              |  | Net Loss                    |        |      | Total Revenues            |         | Net Loss                  | 
|Three Months Ended June 30, |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |        |      | Six Months Ended June 30, |         | Six Months Ended June 30, | 
|2005                        |  | 2004                        |        | 2005 |                           |         | 2004                      |  |   | 2005     |   | 2004 |   | 2005   |  |   | 2004   | 
|$42,992                     |  | $                           | 10,806 |      | $                         | (49,114 | )                         |  | $ | (211,415 | ) |      | $ | 78,504 |  | $ | 21,587 |  | $ | (87,530 | ) |  | $ | (378,961 | )
|                            |  |                             |        |      |                           |         |                           |  |   |          |   |      |   |        |  |   |        |  |   |         |   |  |   |          |  



Summary of OperationsFund
II-IIOW Associates Investments



Condensed financial information for
the joint ventures in which the Partnership held interests through its equity interest in Fund II-IIOW Associates for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, is presented below:



|                            |  |                             |           |                                         |   |           |                                     |      |                             |  |      |         |      |  |      |       |      |   |         |  |   |         |  |   |         |  
|--------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | --------- | --------------------------------------- | - | --------- | ----------------------------------- | ---- | --------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | - | ------- |  | - | ------- |  | - | ------- | -
|                            |  | Total Revenues              |           | Income (Loss) FromContinuing Operations |   |           | Income From Discontinued Operations |      | Net Income (Loss)           | 
|                            |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |           | Three Months Ended June 30,             |   |           | Three Months Ended June 30,         |      | Three Months Ended June 30, | 
|                            |  | 2005                        |           | 2004                                    |   | 2005      |                                     | 2004 |                             |  | 2005 |         | 2004 |  | 2005 |       | 2004 |  
|Fund I-II Tucker Associates |  | $                           | 188,801   |                                         | $ | 175,353   |                                     | $    | 6,151                       |  | $    | (25,348 | )    |  | $    | 0     |      | $ | 0       |  | $ | 6,151   |  | $ | (25,348 | )
|Fund II-III Associates      |  |                             | 490,369   |                                         |   | 446,104   |                                     |      | 151,821                     |  |      | 6,268   |      |  |      | 1,463 |      |   | 78,833  |  |   | 153,284 |  |   | 85,101  |  
|                            |  |                             |           |                                         |   |           |                                     |      |                             |  |      |         |      |  |      |       |      |   |         |  |   |         |  |   |         |  
|                            |  | $                           | 679,170   |                                         | $ | 621,457   |                                     | $    | 157,972                     |  | $    | (19,080 | )    |  | $    | 1,463 |      | $ | 78,833  |  | $ | 159,435 |  | $ | 59,753  |  
|                            |  |                             |           |                                         |   |           |                                     |      |                             |  |      |         |      |  |      |       |      |   |         |  |   |         |  |   |         |  
|                            |  |                             |           |                                        
|                            |  | Total Revenues              |           | Income (Loss) FromContinuing Operations |   |           | Income From Discontinued Operations |      | Net Income (Loss)           | 
|                            |  | Six Months Ended June 30,   |           | Six Months Ended June 30,               |   |           | Six Months Ended June 30,           |      | Six Months Ended June 30,   | 
|                            |  | 2005                        |           | 2004                                    |   | 2005      |                                     | 2004 |                             |  | 2005 |         | 2004 |  | 2005 |       | 2004 |  
|Fund I-II Tucker Associates |  | $                           | 362,587   |                                         | $ | 353,573   |                                     | $    | 16,103                      |  | $    | (53,868 | )    |  | $    | 0     |      | $ | 0       |  | $ | 16,103  |  | $ | (53,868 | )
|Fund II-III Associates      |  |                             | 947,297   |                                         |   | 892,208   |                                     |      | 267,795                     |  |      | 26,260  |      |  |      | 2,283 |      |   | 135,781 |  |   | 270,078 |  |   | 162,041 |  
|                            |  |                             |           |                                         |   |           |                                     |      |                             |  |      |         |      |  |      |       |      |   |         |  |   |         |  |   |         |  
|                            |  | $                           | 1,309,884 |                                         | $ | 1,245,781 |                                     | $    | 283,898                     |  | $    | (27,608 | )    |  | $    | 2,283 |      | $ | 135,781 |  | $ | 286,181 |  | $ | 108,173 |  
|                            |  |                             |           |                                         |   |           |                                     |      |                             |  |      |         |      |  |      |       |      |   |         |  |   |         |  |   |         |  



Page 13



---

##### Table of Contents

Summary of OperationsFund II-III Associates Investments



Condensed financial information for the joint venture in which the Partnership held an
interest through its ownership in Fund II-III Associates for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, is presented below:



|                              |  |                             |   |                                          |   |      |                                            |   |                             |   |  |      |        |      |  |      |        |      |   |         |  |   |        |  |   |        
|----------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | - | ---------------------------------------- | - | ---- | ------------------------------------------ | - | --------------------------- | - |  | ---- | ------ | ---- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ------- |  | - | ------ |  | - | -------
|                              |  | Total Revenues              |   | Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations |   |      | Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations |   | Net Income                 
|                              |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |   | Three Months Ended June 30,              |   |      | Three Months Ended June 30,                |   | Three Months Ended June 30,
|                              |  | 2005                        |   | 2004                                     |   | 2005 |                                            |   | 2004                        |   |  | 2005 |        | 2004 |  | 2005 |        | 2004
|Fund II-III-VI-VII Associates |  | $                           | 0 |                                          | $ | 0    |                                            | $ | (2,166                      | ) |  | $    | (4,837 | )    |  | $    | 83,676 |      | $ | 118,181 |  | $ | 81,510 |  | $ | 113,344
|                              |  |                             |   |                                          |   |      |                                            |   |                             |   |  |      |        |      |  |      |        |      |   |         |  |   |        |  |   |        
|                              |  |                             |   |                                         
|                              |  | Total Revenues              |   | Income (Loss) FromContinuing Operations  |   |      | Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations |   | Net Income                 
|                              |  | Six Months Ended June 30,   |   | Six Months Ended June 30,                |   |      | Six Months Ended June 30,                  |   | Six Months Ended June 30,  
|                              |  | 2005                        |   | 2004                                     |   | 2005 |                                            |   | 2004                        |   |  | 2005 |        | 2004 |  | 2005 |        | 2004
|Fund II-III-VI-VII Associates |  | $                           | 0 |                                          | $ | 0    |                                            | $ | (8,208                      | ) |  | $    | (8,157 | )    |  | $    | 90,029 |      | $ | 215,879 |  | $ | 81,821 |  | $ | 207,722
|                              |  |                             |   |                                          |   |      |                                            |   |                             |   |  |      |        |      |  |      |        |      |   |         |  |   |        |  |   |        



ITEM 2.    MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements and notes thereto. See also Cautionary Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements preceding Part I, as well as the notes to our financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004.



Overview



Management believes that the Partnership typically operates through the following five key
life cycle phases. The duration of each phase is dependent upon various economic, industry, market, and other internal/external factors. Some overlap naturally exists in the transition from one phase to the next.



| |  |  | Fundraising phase
| | - |  | -----------------

The period during which the
Partnership is raising capital through the sale and issuance of limited partner units to the public;



| |  |  | Investing phase
| | - |  | ---------------

The period during which the
Partnership invests the capital raised during the fundraising phase, less upfront fees, into the acquisition of real estate assets;



| |  |  | Holding phase
| | - |  | -------------

The period during which real estate
assets are owned and operated by the Partnership during the initial lease terms of the tenants. Strategic dispositions could occur during this phase in order to capitalize on market conditions;



| |  |  | Positioning-for-sale phase
| | - |  | --------------------------

The period during which
the leases in place at the time of acquisition expire and, thus, the Partnership expends time, effort, and funds to re-lease such space to existing and/or new tenants. Following the holding phase, the Partnership continues to own and operate the
real estate assets, evaluate various options for disposition, and market the real estate assets for sale; and



| |  |  | Disposition-and-liquidation phase
| | - |  | ---------------------------------

The period
during which the Partnership sells its real estate investments, distributes net sale proceeds to the partners, liquidates, and terminates the Partnership.



Page 14



---

##### Table of Contents

Portfolio Overview



We are currently in the disposition-and-liquidation phase of our life cycle. We have now sold three assets and a portion of Heritage Place out of the five properties in
which we originally invested. Our focus on the remaining assets involves leasing and marketing efforts that we believe will result in the best disposition pricing for our investors. We continue to aggressively pursue leasing opportunities that will
increase occupancy at Heritage Place and the Louis Rose Building.



With a
number of properties sold, our General Partners are currently reserving operating cash and net sale proceeds, held by Fund II-IIOW Associates, to fund the re-leasing costs anticipated for the Louis Rose Building and Heritage Place. Further, the
General Partners anticipate continuing to hold operating distributions until the Louis Rose Building and Heritage Place are fully re-leased. Once the outcome of the re-leasing efforts is known, the General Partners will evaluate if distributions of
net sale proceeds are appropriate.



Property Summary



Information related to the properties owned, or previously owned, by the Joint Ventures
follows:



| |  |  | The Louis Rose Building is currently vacant. We are aggressively working on re-leasing the building.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Cherokee Commons was sold in 2001 for a gain of approximately $1,725,000, of which approximately $877,000 was allocated to the Partnership.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Heritage Place originally included both an office component and a retail shopping center. The retail center, which represented approximately 30% of the premises, was sold in 2003
for a gain of approximately $293,000, of which approximately $133,000 was allocated to the Partnership.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Boeing at the Atrium property is currently 100% occupied by the Boeing/Shuttle Division of The Boeing Company. The existing lease extends through March 2008.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Brookwood Grill was sold on July 1, 2004 for a gain of approximately $771,000, of which approximately $455,000 was allocated to the Partnership.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Holcomb Bridge Property was sold on July 1, 2004 for a gain of approximately $1,974,000, of which approximately $273,000 was allocated to the Partnership.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | As of June 30, 2005, the property sales described above generated approximately $8,075,000 in net sales proceeds allocated to the Partnership, of which approximately $1,417,000 has
been utilized, and approximately $6,658,000 is currently being reserved to fund the Partnerships pro-rata share of anticipated re-leasing costs at Louis Rose Building (see Liquidity and Capital Resources below).
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



As we move further into the disposition-and-liquidation phase, our attention will shift to
locating suitable buyers and negotiating purchase-sale contracts that will attempt to maximize the total return to the limited partners and minimize contingencies and our post-closing involvement with the buyer.



Results of Operations



Equity in Loss of Fund II and Fund II-OW



Equity in loss of Fund II and Fund II-OW Associates was $46,506 and $201,590 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $82,882 and $358,838 for
the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The 2005 decreases in loss are primarily attributable to (i) an adjustment to 2004 operating expense reimbursement billings to the primary tenant of the Boeing at the Atrium property, which
was recorded in the second quarter of 2005, (ii) an increase in interest income as a result of Fund II-IIOW Associates holding additional net sales proceeds from the July 2004 sales of the Holcomb Bridge Property and Brookwood Grill, and (iii) a
decline in depreciation expense as a result of changing the useful life for all buildings owned through the



Page 15



---

##### Table of Contents

Joint Ventures from 25 years to 40 years effective July 1, 2004, partially offset by (iv) forgone operating income resulting from the sales of the two
aforementioned properties. Tenants are billed for operating expense reimbursements based on estimates, which are reconciled in the following calendar year based on actual costs incurred and the terms of the corresponding tenant leases.



Liquidity and Capital Resources



Our operating strategy entails funding expenses related to the recurring operations of the
properties and the portfolio with operating cash flows, including distributions received from the Joint Ventures, and assessing the amount of remaining cash flows that will be required to fund known re-leasing costs and other capital improvements.
Any residual operating cash flows are considered available for distribution to the limited partners and are generally paid quarterly. As a result, the ongoing monitoring of our cash position is critical to ensuring that adequate liquidity and
capital resources are available. Economic downturns in one or more of our core markets could adversely impact the ability of our tenants to honor lease payments and our ability to re-lease space on favorable terms as leases expire or space otherwise
becomes vacant. In the event of either situation, cash flows and, consequently, our ability to provide funding for capital needs would be adversely affected.



Short-Term Liquidity



During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we generated net operating cash flows of approximately $160, as compared to approximately $330, for the six months ended June 30, 2004, which is comprised entirely of
interest income. Fund II-IIOW Associates continues to reserve operating distributions received from its investments in the Joint Ventures otherwise payable to the Partnership in order to provide funding for the costs anticipated in connection with
re-leasing the Louis Rose Building and Heritage Place. Accordingly, no operating distributions were paid to limited partners during the six months ended June 30, 2005 or 2004. The General Partners anticipate continuing to reserve operating
distributions to limited partners until the Louis Rose Building is re-leased and the related re-leasing costs are funded. Future operating distributions to limited partners will be largely dependent upon the amount of cash generated from the Joint
Ventures, our expectations of future cash flows, and determination of near-term cash needs for tenant re-leasing costs and other capital improvements for properties owned by the Joint Ventures.



We believe that the cash on hand and distributions due from the Joint Ventures are sufficient
to cover our current working capital needs, including liabilities of approximately $8,000, as of June 30, 2005. During the remainder of 2005, our General Partners anticipate that we will be able to fund our proportionate share of capital
expenditures noted above.



Long-Term Liquidity



We expect that our future sources of capital will be primarily derived from net proceeds
generated from the selective and strategic sale of properties and operating cash flows generated from the Joint Ventures. Our future long-term liquidity requirements will include, but not be limited to, funding tenant improvements, renovations,
expansions, and other significant capital improvements necessary for properties owned through the Joint Ventures. Specifically, we anticipate funding the Partnerships proportionate share of the costs required to re-lease the Louis Rose
Building and increase the occupancy of Heritage Place. Future cash flows from operating activities will be primarily affected by distributions received from the Joint Ventures, which are dependent upon the net operating income generated by the Joint
Ventures properties, less reserves for known capital expenditures.



We
have encountered problems re-leasing the Louis Rose Building primarily due to the softening of the Charlotte office market and related Northeast submarket during the period following the expiration of First Unions lease on April 30, 2001. The
Northeast submarket of Charlotte continues to face challenges as the result of new office product deliveries, offering attractive rental rates and other concessions to potential tenants. Current vacancy in the Northeast submarket is 29.2%, compared
to the vacancy rate for Charlotte as a whole of 15.3%. Accordingly, there is no guarantee when the Louis Rose Building will be re-leased or the level of rental rates which may be achieved in connection therewith.



Page 16



---

##### Table of Contents

Capital Resources



The Partnership is an investment vehicle formed for the purpose of acquiring, owning, and operating income-producing real properties or investing in joint ventures formed
for the same purpose, and has invested all of the partners original capital contributions. Thus, it is unlikely that we will acquire interests in any additional properties or joint ventures. Historically, our investment strategy has generally
involved acquiring properties on an all-cash basis that are pre-leased to creditworthy tenants through joint ventures with affiliated partnerships.



The Joint Ventures incur capital expenditures primarily in the form of building improvements for the purpose of maintaining the quality of its properties, and tenant
improvements for the purpose of readying its properties for re-leasing. As leases expire, we will work with the Joint Ventures to attempt to re-lease space to an existing tenant or market the space to prospective new tenants. Generally, tenant
improvements funded in connection with lease renewals require less capital than those funded in connection with new leases. However, external conditions, such as the supply of and demand for comparable space available within a given market, drive
capital costs as well as rental rates. Any capital or other expenditures not provided for by the operations of the Joint Ventures will be funded by the Partnership and the respective Joint Venture partners on a pro-rata basis.



Operating cash flows, if available, are generally distributed from the Joint Ventures to the
Partnership during the second month following each calendar quarter-end. Our cash management policy typically includes first utilizing current period operating cash flow until depleted, at which point operating reserves are utilized to fund capital
and other required expenditures. In the event that current and prior period accumulated operating cash flows are insufficient to fund such costs, net property sale proceeds reserves would then be utilized.



As of June 30, 2005, we had received, used, distributed, and held net proceeds attributable
to the Partnership from the sale of properties as presented below:



|                                            |  |             |           |                                     |      |         |                                            |   |                                  |  |                                |           |                                              |                                                                                                                                |  |   |   |  |   |          
|------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- | --------- | ----------------------------------- | ---- | ------- | ------------------------------------------ | - | -------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | --------- | -------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | - | - |  | - | ---------
|Property Sold                               |  | NetProceeds |           | PartnershipsApproximateOwnership % |      |         | Net ProceedsAttributable to thePartnership |   | Cumulative Net Proceeds Invested |  | Distributed toPartners to date |           | Undistributed NetProceeds as ofJune 30, 2005
|                                            |  |             |           | Amount                              |      | Purpose |                                            |  
|Cherokee Commons (sold in 2001)             |  | $           | 8,414,089 |                                     | 50.8 | %       |                                            | $ | 4,275,779                        |  | $                              | 1,380,616 |                                              |     Re-leasing of Boeing at the Atrium (2003 and 2002)     Funding for Fund I-II Tucker Associates operating expenses (2005) |  | $ | 0 |  | $ | 2,895,163
|Heritage Placeretailportion (sold in 2003) |  |             | 3,207,708 |                                     | 45.5 | %       |                                            |   | 1,460,790                        |  |                                | 23,749    |                                              |     Funding for Fund I-II Tucker Associates                                                                                   |  |   | 0 |  |   | 1,437,041
|                                            |  |             |           |                                     |      |         |                                            |   |                                  |  |                                |           |                                              | operating expenses (2005)                                                                                                      |  |   |   |  |   |          
|Holcomb BridgeProperty (sold in 2004)       |  |             | 6,889,379 |                                     | 13.8 | %       |                                            |   | 952,801                          |  |                                | 5,278     |                                              |     Funding for Fund I-II Tucker Associates                                                                                   |  |   | 0 |  |   | 947,523  
|                                            |  |             |           |                                     |      |         |                                            |   |                                  |  |                                |           |                                              | operating expenses (2005)                                                                                                      |  |   |   |  |   |          
|Brookwood Grill (sold in 2004)              |  |             | 2,346,693 |                                     | 59.0 | %       |                                            |   | 1,385,488                        |  |                                | 7,675     |                                              |     Funding for Fund I-II Tucker Associates operating expenses (2005)                                                         |  |   | 0 |  |   | 1,377,813
|                                            |  |             |           |                                     |      |         |                                            |   |                                  |  |                                |           |                                              |                                                                                                                                |  |   |   |  |   |          
|Total                                       |  |             |           |                                     |      |         |                                            | $ | 8,074,858                        |  | $                              | 1,417,318 |                                              |                                                                                                                                |  | $ | 0 |  | $ | 6,657,540
|                                            |  |             |           |                                     |      |         |                                            |   |                                  |  |                                |           |                                              |                                                                                                                                |  |   |   |  |   |          



The net proceeds listed above will
continue to be held in reserve by Fund II-IIOW Associates as our General Partners evaluate the capital needs of the existing properties in which we hold an interest.



Page 17



---

##### Table of Contents

Related-Party Transactions



Related-Party Fees and Reimbursements



We have entered into agreements with Wells Capital, Wells Management, an affiliate of our General Partners, and their affiliates, whereby we pay certain fees and expense
reimbursements to Wells Capital, Wells Management, and their affiliates for asset management; the management and leasing of our properties; administrative services relating to accounting, property management, and other partnership administration;
and incur the related expenses. See Note 3 to our financial statements included in this report for a description of these fees and expense reimbursements we have incurred.



Economic Dependency



We have engaged Wells Capital, our corporate General Partner, and Wells Management, an affiliate of Wells Capital, to provide certain services that are essential to the
Partnership, including asset management services, supervision of the management and leasing of properties owned through the Joint Ventures, asset acquisition and disposition services, as well as other administrative responsibilities for the
Partnership including accounting services, shareholder communications, and investor relations. These agreements are terminable by either party on 60 days written notice. As a result of these relationships, the Partnership is dependent upon
Wells Capital and Wells Management.



Wells Capital and Wells Management are all
owned and controlled by Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. (WREF). The operations of Wells Capital and Wells Management represent substantially all of the business of WREF. Accordingly, the Partnership focuses on the financial condition of
WREF when assessing the financial condition of Wells Capital and Wells Management. In the event that WREF were to become unable to meet its obligations as they become due, the Partnership might be required to find alternative service providers.



WREFs net income was approximately $14.4 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2005. Future net income generated by WREF will be largely dependent upon the amount of fees earned by Wells Capital and Wells Management based on, among other things, the level of investor proceeds raised from the sale of common stock
of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc., an affiliated real estate investment trust for which Wells Capital serves as the advisor, and the volume of future acquisitions and dispositions of real estate assets by Wells-sponsored programs. As of
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, WREF held cash balances of approximately $32.2 million and $6.3 million, respectively. WREF believes that it has adequate liquidity available in the form of cash on hand and current receivables necessary to meet
its obligations as they become due.



Dismissal of Litigation against Related
Parties



During early 2004, a putative class action complaint was filed
against, among others, Leo. F. Wells, III, and Wells Capital, our General Partner, and Wells Management. The Court granted the plaintiffs motion to permit voluntary dismissal of this suit, and it was subsequently dismissed without prejudice.
In November 2004, the same plaintiffs filed a second putative class action complaint against, among others, Mr. Wells, Wells Capital, and Wells Management. On January 28, 2005, the defendants filed motions for summary judgment and motions to dismiss
the plaintiffs claims. Pursuant to orders entered July 1, 2005, the Court granted the Wells defendants motions to dismiss and for summary judgment on all counts in the complaint. Thus, this action has now been dismissed, subject to the
plaintiffs right to file a notice of appeal within the required time period. On August 3, 2005, the plaintiffs filed a motion requesting the Court to re-enter the orders to give the plaintiffs an opportunity to file a motion for
reconsideration or notice of appeal.



Inflation



The real estate market has not been affected significantly by inflation in the past three
years due to the relatively low inflation rate. However, there are provisions in the majority of tenant leases, which should protect us from



Page 18



---

##### Table of Contents

the impact of inflation. These provisions include reimbursement billings for operating expense pass-through charges, real estate tax and insurance
reimbursements on a per-square-foot basis, or in some cases, annual reimbursement of operating expenses above a certain per-square-foot allowance. There is no assurance, however, that we would be able to replace existing leases with new leases at
higher base rental rates.



Application of Critical Accounting Policies



The Partnerships accounting policies have been established to
conform with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If managements judgment or interpretation of
the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, thus resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other
companies may utilize different estimates that may impact comparability of the Partnerships results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.



Below is a discussion of the accounting policies that management considers to be critical in that they may require complex judgment in their
application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.



Investment in Real Estate Assets



We will be required to make
subjective assessments as to the useful lives of its depreciable assets. We will consider the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. The estimated useful
lives of Fund II-IIOW Associates assets by class are as follows:



|                      |  |            
|--------------------- |  | -----------
|Buildings             |  | 40 years   
|Building improvements |  | 10-25 years
|Land improvements     |  | 20 years   
|Tenant Improvements   |  | Lease term 



Effective July 1, 2004, the Joint
Ventures extended the weighted-average composite useful life for all building assets from 25 years to 40 years, which resulted in a decrease to our net loss for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005. We believe that this change more
appropriately reflects the estimated useful lives of real estate assets and is consistent with prevailing industry practice. In the event that the Joint Ventures utilize inappropriate useful lives or methods of depreciation, our net income would be
misstated.



Valuation of Real Estate Assets



We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the
carrying amounts of the real estate assets, in which we have an ownership interest, either directly or through investments in the Joint Ventures, may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present which indicate that the
carrying amounts of real estate assets may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether the carrying value of the real estate assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future
operating cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, management adjusts the real estate assets to the fair value and
recognizes an impairment loss. We have determined that there has been no impairment in the carrying value of any of the real estate assets held by the Partnership and any unconsolidated joint venture as of June 30, 2005.



Page 19



---

##### Table of Contents

Projections of expected future cash flows require management to estimate future market rental income amounts subsequent
to the expiration of current lease agreements, property operating expenses, discount rates, the number of months it takes to re-lease the property, and the number of years the property is held for investment. The use of inappropriate assumptions in
the future cash flow analysis would result in an incorrect assessment of the propertys future cash flows and fair value, and could result in the overstatement of the carrying value of real estate assets held by the Joint Ventures and net
income of the Partnership.



Potential Tax Impact for Limited Partners
Holding Class B UnitsAmerican Jobs Creation Act of 2004



The
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) added Section 470 to the Internal Revenue Code, which provides certain limitations on the utilization of losses allocable to leased property owned by a partnership having both taxable and
tax-exempt partners such as the Partnership. Currently, it is unclear as to how the transition rules and effective dates set forth in the Act are intended to apply to entities such as the Partnership. However, on March 11, 2005, the Internal Revenue
Service issued IRS Notice 2005-29 announcing that the IRS will not apply Section 470 to partnerships for taxable year 2004 based solely on the fact that a partnership had both taxable and tax-exempt partners. It is important to note that IRS Notice
2005-29 provided relief for partnerships for taxable year 2004 only. Accordingly, unless Congress passes corrective legislation which addresses this issue or some other form of relief from the provisions of Section 470 of the Act is granted,
beginning in 2005 and thereafter, future passive losses allocable to Class B limited partners may only be used to offset passive income generated from the same property or within the same fund.



ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK



Since we do not borrow any money, make any foreign investments, or invest in any market risk-sensitive instruments, we are not subject to risks relating to interest
rates, foreign current exchange rate fluctuations, or the other market risks contemplated by Item 305 of Regulation S-K.



ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES



The Partnership carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management of Wells Capital, our corporate General Partner, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures as to the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, the Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures were effective.



There were no significant changes in the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 that have materially
affected, or are likely to materially affect, the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting.



Page 20



---

##### Table of Contents

PART II.     OTHER INFORMATION



ITEM 1.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS



We were not involved in any material legal proceedings during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 requiring disclosure under Item 103 of Regulation S-K.



ITEM 2.    UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS



|(a) | We did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 during the quarter ended June 30, 2005.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | Not applicable.
|--- | ---------------



|(c) | We did not redeem any securities during the quarter ended June 30, 2005.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



ITEM 3.    DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES



We were not subject to any indebtedness, and therefore, we did not default respect to any indebtedness during the quarter ended June 30, 2005.



ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS



No matters were submitted to a vote of our limited partners during the quarter ended June 30, 2005.



ITEM 5.    OTHER INFORMATION



|(a) | During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, there was no information which was required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K which was not disclosed in a report on Form 8-K.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | Not applicable
|--- | --------------



ITEM 6.    EXHIBITS



The
Exhibits to this report are set forth on Exhibit Index to Second Quarter Form 10-Q attached hereto.



Page 21



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.



|                |  |  |  |                                                                                                   
|--------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                |  |  |  | WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II                                                                         
|                |  |  |  | (Registrant)                                                                                      
|                |  | 
|                |  |  |  | By: WELLS CAPITAL, INC.                                                                           
|                |  |  |  | (Corporate General Partner)                                                                       
|                |  | 
|August 12, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    LEO F. WELLS, III                                                                          
|                |  |  |  | Leo F. Wells, III President, Principal
Executive Officer, and Sole Director of Wells Capital, Inc.
|                |  | 
|August 12, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                                                                        
|                |  |  |  | Douglas P. Williams Principal Financial
Officer of Wells Capital, Inc.                            



Page 22



---

##### Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



TO SECOND QUARTER FORM 10-Q

OF

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



|            |  |                                                                                                                               
|----------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit No. |  | Description                                                                                                                   
|            | 
|31.1        |  | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                        
|            | 
|31.2        |  | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                        
|            | 
|32.1        |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002