Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 30181 

(d) Enforcement period. This rule is 

effective and will be enforced from 10 

p.m. until 11 p.m. on June 17, 2016. 

(e) Information broadcasts. The COTP 

or the COTP’s representative will inform 

the public through broadcast notices to 

mariners of the enforcement period for 

the safety zone as well as any changes 

in the planned schedule. 

Dated: May 9, 2016. 

M. L. Malloy, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Upper Mississippi River. 

[FR Doc. 2016–11569 Filed 5–13–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2016–0136] 

Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks, 

Crescent City, Crescent City Harbor, 

Crescent City, CA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of enforcement. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce 

the safety zone for the Crescent City 

Fourth of July Fireworks display in the 

Captain of the Port, San Francisco area 

of responsibility during the dates and 

times noted below. This action is 

necessary to protect life and property of 

the maritime public from the hazards 

associated with the fireworks display. 

During the enforcement period, 

unauthorized persons or vessels are 

prohibited from entering into, transiting 

through, or anchoring in the safety zone, 

unless authorized by the Patrol 

Commander (PATCOM). 

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 

165.1191, Table 1, Item number 4 will 

be enforced from 9:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. 

on July 4, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this notice of 

enforcement, call or email Lieutenant 

Junior Grade Christina Ramirez, U.S. 

Coast Guard Sector San Francisco; 

telephone (415) 399–3585 or email at 

D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast 

Guard will enforce the safety zone 

established in 33 CFR 165.1191, Table 1, 

Item number 4 on July 4, 2016. Upon 

commencement of the 30 minute 

fireworks display, scheduled to begin at 

9:30 p.m. on July 4, 2016, the safety 

zone will encompass the navigable 

waters surrounding the land-based 

launch site on the West Jetty of Crescent 

City Harbor within a radius of 700 feet 

in approximate position 41°44′41′′ N, 

124°11′59′′ W (NAD 83) for the Fourth 

of July Fireworks, Crescent City in 33 

CFR 165.1191, Table 1, Item number 4. 

Upon the conclusion of the fireworks 

display the safety zone shall terminate. 

This safety zone will be in effect from 

9:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2016. 

Under the provisions of 33 CFR 

165.1191, unauthorized persons or 

vessels are prohibited from entering 

into, transiting through, or anchoring in 

the safety zone during all applicable 

effective dates and times, unless 

authorized to do so by the PATCOM. 

Additionally, each person who receives 

notice of a lawful order or direction 

issued by an official patrol vessel shall 

obey the order or direction. The 

PATCOM is empowered to forbid entry 

into and control the regulated area. The 

PATCOM shall be designated by the 

Commander, Coast Guard Sector San 

Francisco. The PATCOM may, upon 

request, allow the transit of commercial 

vessels through regulated areas when it 

is safe to do so. 

This notice of enforcement is issued 

under authority of 33 CFR 165.1191 and 

5 U.S.C. 552 (a). In addition to this 

notice of enforcement in the Federal 

Register, the Coast Guard plans to 

provide the maritime community with 

notification of the safety zone and its 

enforcement period via the Local Notice 

to Mariners. 

If the Captain of the Port determines 

that the regulated area need not be 

enforced for the full duration stated in 

this notice, a Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners may be used to grant general 

permission to enter the regulated area. 

Dated: April 20, 2016. 

Gregory G. Stump, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port San Francisco. 

[FR Doc. 2016–11490 Filed 5–13–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2016–0050; FRL–9946–39– 

Region 10] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Oregon: 

Interstate Transport of Lead and 

Nitrogen Dioxide 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Clean Air Act (CAA) 

requires each State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) to contain adequate provisions 

prohibiting air emissions that will have 

certain adverse air quality effects in 

other states. On October 20, 2015, the 

State of Oregon made a submittal to the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

to address these requirements. The EPA 

is approving the submittal as meeting 

the requirements that each SIP contain 

adequate provisions to prohibit 

emissions that will contribute 

significantly to nonattainment or 

interfere with maintenance of the 2008 

lead (Pb) and 2010 nitrogen dioxide 

(NO2) National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards (NAAQS) in any other state. 

DATES: This final rule is effective June 

15, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R10–OAR–2016–0050. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the http://www.regulations.gov Web 

site. Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information the disclosure 

of which is restricted by statute. Certain 

other material, such as copyrighted 

material, is not placed on the Internet 

and will be publicly available only in 

hard copy form. Publicly available 

docket materials are available either 

electronically through http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air Programs Unit, Office of Air, 

Waste and Toxics, EPA Region 10, 1200 

Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. The 

EPA requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the individual listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

view the hard copy of the docket. You 

may view the hard copy of the docket 

Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 

4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristin Hall at (206) 553–6357, 

hall.kristin@epa.gov, or the above EPA, 

Region 10 address. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Background Information 

II. Final Action 

III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review 

I. Background Information 

On October 20, 2015, Oregon made a 

submittal to address the interstate 

transport requirements of CAA section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for multiple NAAQS, 

including the 2008 Pb and 2010 NO2

NAAQS. On March 11, 2016, the EPA 

proposed to approve the submittal as 

meeting the interstate transport 

requirements of CAA section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 Pb and 

2010 NO2 NAAQS (81 FR 12849). An 


Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
30182 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

explanation of the CAA requirements, a 

detailed analysis of the submittal, and 

the EPA’s reasons for approval were 

provided in the proposal and will not 

restated here. The public comment 

period for the proposal ended on April 

11, 2016. The EPA received no 

comments. 

II. Final Action 

The EPA is approving Oregon’s 

October 20, 2015 submittal as meeting 

the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) 

interstate transport requirements for the 

2008 Pb and 2010 NO2 NAAQS. The 

remainder of the submittal, with respect 

to the 2010 sulfur dioxide and 2012 fine 

particulate matter NAAQS, will be 

addressed in separate, future actions. 

III. Statutory and Executive Orders 

Review 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

this action does not involve technical 

standards; and 

• does not provide the EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where the EPA or 

an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), nor will it impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. The EPA will 

submit a report containing this action 

and other required information to the 

U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. A major rule cannot take effect 

until 60 days after it is published in the 

Federal Register. This action is not a 

‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by July 15, 2016. Filing a petition 

for reconsideration by the Administrator 

of this final rule does not affect the 

finality of this action for the purposes of 

judicial review nor does it extend the 

time within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. This action may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. See section 

307(b)(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: May 4, 2016. 

Dennis J. McLerran, 

Regional Administrator, Region 10. 

For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart MM—Oregon 

■ 2. Section 52.1991 is amended by 

adding paragraph (e) to read as follows: 

§ 52.1991 Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure 

requirements. 

* * * * * 

(e) The EPA approves Oregon’s 

October 20, 2015 submittal as meeting 

the requirements of CAA section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 lead and 

2010 nitrogen dioxide NAAQS. 

[FR Doc. 2016–11380 Filed 5–13–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 63 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0360; FRL–9946–32– 

OAR] 

RIN 2060–AR47 

National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants: Off-Site 

Waste and Recovery Operations: 

Action Denying a Petition for 

Reconsideration 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of action denying a 

petition for reconsideration. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is providing notice that it 

has responded to a petition for 

reconsideration of a final rule published 

in the Federal Register on March 18, 

2015. The rule promulgated 

amendments to the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

(NESHAP): Off-Site Waste and Recovery 

Operations (OSWRO) based on our 

residual risk and technology review 

(RTR) conducted for the OSWRO source 

category. The agency previously granted 

reconsideration of one issue raised in 

the petition. The Administrator denied 

the second issue raised in the petition 

in letters to the petitioners dated May 5, 

2016. 


Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES