alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3776 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3776

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide capital gains tax 
           treatment for certain self-created musical works.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2004

  Mr. Lewis of Kentucky (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Tanner, Mr. 
Foley, Mr. McInnis, Mrs. Bono, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Ford, Mr. Jenkins, Mr. 
 Duncan, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Cooper, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Davis of Tennessee, Mr. 
 Rogers of Kentucky, and Mr. Whitfield) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide capital gains tax 
           treatment for certain self-created musical works.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Songwriters Capital Gains Tax Equity 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CAPITAL GAINS TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN SELF-CREATED MUSICAL WORKS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 1221 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to capital asset defined) is amended by 
redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4) and by inserting after 
paragraph (2) the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Sale or exchange of self-created musical works.--At 
        the election of the taxpayer, paragraphs (1) and (3) of 
        subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to any sale or 
        exchange of musical compositions or copyrights in musical works 
        by a taxpayer described in subsection (a)(3).''.
    (b) Limitation on Charitable Contributions.--Subparagraph (A) of 
section 170(e)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
inserting ``(determined without regard to section 1221(b)(3))'' after 
``long-term capital gain''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT99.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

I, James W. Klingler,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report Troy Group, Inc. onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2002 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of TroyGroup, Inc.

 

 
|   | By:                                           | /s/ James W. Klingler |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|   | Name: James W. Klingler                       |
|   | Title: Chief Financial  Officer and Secretary |

 

----
#### Richard B. Saunders, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. William Bowes, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion Filed May 27, 1913.

In an action to recover damages for a negligent injury, where the evidence is conflicting, but there is substantial testimony to sustain a verdict involving a finding that the defendant was negligent and that the plaintiff was not negligent, and there is nothing to indicate that the jury were not governed by the evidence, the verdict will not be disturbed by the appellate court, no errors of law affecting the verdict being made to appear.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court of Escambia County.

Judgment affirmed.

*478*Blount*& *Blount*& *Garter,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*R. P. Reese*and *J. P. Stokes,*for Defendant in Error.

Whitfield, J.

Bowes recovered a judgment against Saunders as damages for injuries sustained by Bowes' in a collision between Saunders’ automobile and a motor cycle upon which Bowes was riding. On writ of error Saunders contends that the evidence shows that the negligence of the plaintiff contributed to the injury, if it did not cause the injury, and that under the law Bowes should not recover damages from the defendant for the injuries.

It appears that the accident occurred as the plaintiff on a motor cycle was going north on the right hand side of a street in Pensacola by a collision with an automobile of the defendant which came across the street from the left. There is evidence that the plaintiff was observing the rights of others, and that the collision was caused by the undue speed of the automobile and the nonobservance of the plaintiff’s rights, he being on the proper side of the street in going north, while the defendant’s •car was apparently turning to go south, for which purpose the automobile should have been kept on the other side of the street. There is also evidence that the defendants’ car had stopped, and that the plaintiff was going at excessive speed and ran the motor cycle against the automobile. It is clear the automobile was on the wrong side of the street to be going south, and its driver should have exercised care accordingly so as not to injure or unduly interfere with the passage of those who were rightfully on that side of the street going north.

The jury having passed upon the conflicts in the evidence and having found for the plaintiff, the verdict will *479not be disturbed, since there is substantial testimony to sustain the verdict involving a finding that the defendant was negligent, and that the plaintiff was not negligent, and there is nothing to indicate that the jury were not governed by the evidence, no errors of law affecting the verdict being shown.

The judgment is affirmed.

Shackleford, C. J., and Taylor, Cockrell-and Hooker, J. J., concur.
#### § 4.2 Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

The OCC is charged with assuring the safety and soundness of, and compliance with laws and regulations, fair access to financial services, and fair treatment of customers by, the institutions and other persons subject to its jurisdiction. The OCC examines, supervises, and regulates national banks, Federal branches and agencies of foreign banks, and Federal savings associations to carry out this mission. The OCC also issues rules and regulations applicable to state savings associations.

[76 FR 43561, July 21, 2011]
#### § 121.661 Initial approach altitude: Flag operations.

When making an initial approach to a radio navigation facility under IFR, no person may descend below the pertinent minimum altitude for initial approach (as specified in the instrument approach procedure for that facility) until his arrival over that facility has been definitely established.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10488]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Child Care Subsidy 
Application--Provider

AGENCY: Office of Child Care, GSA.

ACTION: Notice of request for approval for a new information collection 
entitled Child Care Subsidy Application--Provider.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The General Services Administration has submitted an emergency 
processing information collection to the Office of Management and 
Budget pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
chapter 35). OMB approval has been requested by May 3, 2000. The 
proposed information collection activity is for the approval of the 
form for implementation of the GSA Child Care Subsidy for lower income 
Federal employees. The OPM Rule was published March 14, 2000. The form 
would be used to verify the fees paid by Federal employees to licensed 
child care providers so that providers could be paid a portion of those 
fees by GSA. The Rule requires funds to subsidize lower income 
employees' child care rate be paid to child care providers rather than 
employees. The form will also request banking information so those 
child care providers can be paid via electronic funds transfer.

DATES: Submit comments on or before May 3, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect 
of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing 
this burden, should be submitted to: Marjorie Ashby, General Service 
Administration, (MVP) 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bonnie Storm, Office of Child Care, 
GSA, 202-208-5119.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    A. Purpose: The purpose of this Notice is to consult with and 
solicit comments from the public concerning the proposed collection of 
information regarding GSA child care subsidy for lower income GSA 
employees.
    B. Annual Reporting Burden Respondents: 500, annual responses; 500; 
average hours per response: .15; bruden hours: 125.

Copy of Proposal

    A copy of this proposal may be obtained from Office of Child Care, 
Room 6118, GSA Building, 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20405, or 
calling (202) 208-5119.

Sue McIver,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator for Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-10488 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-M
#### DUNCAN AND LOGAN *v.*FERGUSON, ET AL.

Township roads — common law — judicial discretion — supervision—writ of error.

Where the law empowers the Common Pleas to make any order in the case, which they may deem just and reasonable, the order so made cannot, in the nature of things, be examined in another couit. Such is the case as to township roads.

Wherever the supervisoiy power of a superior has been exercised in a case in an inferior court, it should not be again exercised iu another.

Application for a writ of error. The papers' exhibited, showed that a petition had been presented for a township road to the trustees. The proceedings were appealed to the Court of Common Pleas — objections there made to the proceedings before the trustees, and their order confirmed.

By the Court.

Tiie act providing for laying out township roads, (29 *O. L.*366) allows an appeal from the trustees to the Court of Common Pleas, and authorizes that court, if in their opinion justice requires it, to order another view of said road, *or to make any order which they may deem just and reasonable in, the case.*The- giving this appeal to the Common Pleas, is not providing for a case of common law jurisdiction, but for the exercise of a special' power, usually conferred upon commissioners. The case is not, therefore, within our control as a mere court of common law, and we are not required to take jurisdiction. In ordinary cases the removal of any case from the court or tribunal where it originated to a supervisory court, and a decision there should put an end to litigation, and the case not bo subject to the revision of another tribunal. But however that may be in the case before us, we think the power conferred upon the Court of Common Pleas to *make any order*in the case, *which they may deem just and*honorable, is conclusive, and the exercise of such a power cannot, in the nature of things, be subjected to the discretion of another tribunal.

The writ of error is refused.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 4.14

                                 HOLDER JOINDER

     By execution of this Holder Joinder, the undersigned agrees to become a
party to that certain Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 9,
2000 (as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise  modified
from time to time, the "Registration Rights Agreement"), between Spanish
Broadcasting System, Inc. and the other persons from time to time party thereto.
The undersigned shall have all the rights, and shall observe all of the
obligations, applicable to a Holder (as defined in the Registration Rights
Agreement).

Name: Rodriguez Communications, L.P.


Address for Notices:                          with copies to:
8828 Stemmons Freeway, Suite 106              Chad D. Burkhardt
Dallas, Texas 75247                           Thompson & Knight L.L.P.
Telephone: 214-634-7780                       1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 3300
Fax: 214-634-7523                             Dallas, Texas 75204




                                              Rodriguez Communications, L.P.
Date: March 13, 2001                          By: Rodriguez Operating, Inc.
                                                  Its General Partner

                                                  By: /s/James L. Anderson
                                                         James L. Anderson,
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                             AMARIN CORPORATION PLC


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Amarin Corporation plc (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rick
Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ Rick Stewart
--------------------------------------
Rick Stewart
Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 24, 2003.
§ 1212.600 General policy. In compliance with the Privacy Act and in accordance with the requirements and procedures of this regulation, NASA has an obligation to: ( a ) Advise individuals, when requested, as to whether any specific system of records maintained by NASA contains records pertaining to them;
( b ) Prevent records being maintained by NASA in a system of records for a specific purpose from being used or made available for another purpose without the individual's consent; and,
( c ) Permit individuals to have access to information about themselves in a NASA system of records, to have a copy made, and, if appropriate under subpart 1212.3 of this part, to amend the records.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3234 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3234

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  14 Chestnut Street in Liberty, New York, as the ``Ben R. Gerow Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14 
Chestnut Street in Liberty, New York, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Ben R. Gerow Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ben R. Gerow Post Office 
Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-41291

Conference Calendar

 

RICHARD WARD,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

CHANDLER, Warden; US PENITENTIARY, Beaumont,

Respondents-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:99-CV-490

--------------------

June 13, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Richard Charles Ward (#12020-018), a federal prisoner

incarcerated at FCC Beaumont, filed a pro se application for a

writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging the

Bureau of Prisons's refusal to credit him for time served while

in state custody. The district court denied the application and

Ward has appealed. 

Ward, who is represented by counsel on appeal, has not

briefed the question whether he can be required to serve his

sentences in installments. Because Ward has not briefed this
No. 99-41291

-2-

issue, it is waived. Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff

Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). 

Ward has raised two new issues: (1) whether the Bureau of

Prisons's refusal to run Ward's federal sentences concurrent with

his state sentences violates his plea agreement with the

Government and (2) whether the sentencing court's oral

pronouncement, sentencing Ward to concurrent 13-month terms of

imprisonment, takes precedence over its written judgment,

sentencing him to concurrent 103-month terms of imprisonment. We

do not reach these issues because they have been raised for the

first time on appeal and do not involve purely legal questions. 

Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R.

42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

Motion submitting Part of Exhibit II of BDO Puerto Rico, PSC’s (now known as, Old Puerto 

Rico, PSC) Response to 570th Omnibus Objection

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

COMES NOW BDO Puerto Rico PSC (now known as, Old Puerto Rico, PSC) 

represented by the undersigned attorney and respectfully sets forth and prays:

1. Exhibit no. II of the appearing party’s Response to the 570th Omnibus objection contains 830 pages. 

Due to the data storage limits set by the CM/ECF system when filing an exhibit, Creditor BDO Puerto 

Rico PSC (hereinafter “OLD”) must file Exhibit II in parts. ECF no. 24317.

2. Therefore, Creditor OLD will file several notices with Exhibit II divided into parts of approximately 

70 to 95 pages each. With this motion, Creditor includes pages 1 to 73 of Exhibit II. 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective title III case number and the last four (4) 

digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax 

Financing Corporation (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) 

Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric 

Power Authority (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case 

numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24321 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 14:08:29 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

WHEREFORE, Creditor hereby submits the attached partial Exhibit II for its Response 

to the 570th Omnibus Objection filed today at ECF no. 24317.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: In accordance with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9014(b), Fed. R. 

Bankr. P. 7004(b), and the Court’s Sixteenth Amended Notice, Case Management and 

Administrative Procedures Order (Dkt. No. 20190-1) (the “CMP Order”), I hereby certify that a 

true and exact copy of the foregoing was sent by electronic mail upon all the parties listed in the 

Master Service List and by U.S. mail upon all the Standard Parties listed in the CMP Order.

 In Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, on May 25, 2023. 

Juan R. Rivera Font, LLC

27 González Giusti 

Ave.

Suite 602

Guaynabo, PR 00968

Tel: 787-250-8040

s/Juan R. Rivera Font

Juan R. Rivera-Font, Esq.

USDC-PR 221703

 juan@riverafont.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24321 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 14:08:29 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

d1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

144685(33)

AVERN BURNSIDE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 144685

COA: 306913

Genesee CC: 09

- 025749

- FC

GENESEE CIRCUIT JUDGE,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 25, 2012

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
#### GOLDSTEIN *v.*WINGO.

No. 9250.

November 15, 1932.

*Noah J.*Stone, for plaintiff.

*Sam Geffen*and *Louis JJeffen,*for defendant.

Gilbert, J.

Sidney Goldstein sought to enjoin Lucille Wingo from the breach of a contract for personal services entered into between them, providing in substance for the employment of the latter by the former at a stipulated salary, determinable at any time by either party, and also providing that “in consideration of said employment, and the payment of the compensation stated herein, by party of the first part to party of the second part, said party of the second part agrees that upon the termination of this contract by either party, with or without cause, that said party of the second part will not work for or become engaged in business as an agent or owner of any business in competition with said party of the first part in the City of Atlanta within a period of one (1) year from the date of the termination of the relationship of employer and employee, between the parties hereto.” After a hearing an interlocutory injunction was refused. The exception is to that judgment. Under the pleadings and the conflicting evidence, it was not error to refuse the interlocutory injunction sought.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*