alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

U.S. Army Research Laboratory, DOD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6, announcement is made of the availability of the following U.S. patent for non-exclusive, partially exclusive or exclusive licensing. The listed patent has been assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army, Washington, DC.

This patent covers a wide variety of technical arts including: A bimetallic actuator for heat-transfer applications where the source of energy is provided by a temperature difference between two reservoirs.

Under the authority of section 11(a)(2) of the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-502) and Section 207 of Title 35, United States Code, the Department of the Army as represented by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory wish to license the U.S. patent listed below in a non-exclusive, exclusive or partially exclusive manner to any party interested in manufacturing, using, and/or selling devices or processes covered by this patent.

*Title:*                         Passive Bimetallic Actuator for heat Transfer.                    

*Inventor:*                         Russell DeAnna.                    

*Patent Number:*                         6,039,262.                    

*Issued Date:*                         November 9, 1999.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Norma Cammaratta, Technology Transfer Office, AMSRL-CS-TT, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD 20783-1197 tel: (301) 394-2952; fax: (301) 394-5818.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Gregory D. Showalter,

Army Federal Register, Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-10635  Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
# C_2022262EN.01001201.xml

| 7.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/12

---

EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 March 2022

(Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of ESA’s Decision No 195/04/COL 14 July 2004 (1))

(2022/C 262/08)

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines as amended by ESA’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To obtain the applicable reference rates, appropriate margins shall be added to the base rate in accordance with the State Aid Guidelines.

Base rates have been determined as follows:

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.3.2022 – | 2,56 | -0,57 | 0,90 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.3.2022 –

2,56

-0,57

0,90

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and EEA Supplement to the OJ No. 26/2006, 25.5.2006, p. 1.

---
#### Mary E. MYERS, Administratrix *v.*MUTUAL of OMAHA INSURANCE CO.

5-6014

484 S.W. 2d 879

Opinion delivered October 2, 1972

*Terral, Rawlings, Matthews ér Purtle,*by: *Harlan A. Weber,*for appellant.

*136Smith., *Williams, Friday, Eldredge & Clark,*by: *Max C. Mehlburger,*for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

This suit was instituted to recover sick benefits under an insurance policy executed by appellee to Cecil L. Myers. The insured having died prior to trial, his widow, as administratrix, was substituted as plaintiff. The court sitting as a jury absolved appellee, stating that the notice of sickness was not timely made, and that there was no substantial evidence of insured’s mental or physical condition as would excuse him from timely filing proof of loss.

Cecil L. Myers purchased the policy in 1927. In 1963 he was suffering from emphysema and diverticulitis and was incapacitated from working. Mrs. Myers discovered the policy late in 1969 and within a few months filed claim. Payments for the years preceding the notice were denied. Suit was brought to recover monthly benefits for the five years next preceding the filing of suit.

The policy provides that notice of sickness shall be given the insurer within ten days after the commencement of disability therefrom. Affirmative proof of loss is required to be furnished within ninety days after the loss. The final pertinent provision requires strict compliance with the stated conditions as a condition precedent to recovery. The identical requirements were present in the policy considered in *Business Men’s Assur. Co.*v. *Selvidge,*187 Ark. 1040, 63 S.W. 2d 640 (1933). We construed the stipulations as being “reasonable and valid.”

Appellant argues for exception to the notice requirements and cites a line of cases which hold that incompetency waives the notice requirements. We have so held in a number of cases involving insanity. For example, *Pfeiffer*v. *Missouri State Life Insurance Co.,*174 Ark. 783, 297 S.W. 847 (1927). The trial court in the case before us found as a fact that “there was no substantial evidence of insured’s mental or physical condition that would excuse him from filing a proof of loss.” Mr. Myers’ doctor was asked if the ailments affected Myers’ mind, to which he replied “not his mind necessarily.” On this point we are severely handicapped by appellant’s failure to abstract Mr. *137Myers’ testimony. His deposition, taken several months prior to trial, was introduced in evidence.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**
I, Steven A. Odom, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of VersoTechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to my knowledge:
1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the periodended September 30, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.   Date: November 9, 2004      /s/ Steven A. Odom Steven A. Odom, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-10056 Summary Calendar

__________________ HAROLD GRAY HAYS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-607-A

- - - - - - - - - - July 22, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Harold Gray Hays appeals from the district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of his suit against the United States and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 702-04, seeking return of, or compensation for, property allegedly improperly seized by the DEA and forfeited, in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.No. 96-10056 -2- Hays argues that the court erred in determining that it lacked jurisdiction over the cash and personal property. He argues that the court incorrectly determined that his claim was for damages, because he is only seeking the return of the money and personal property or its equivalent value. We affirm for essentially the reason stated by the district court. See Hays v. DEA , No. 4:95- CV-607-A (N.D. Tx. Jan. 3, 1996).
AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL00-70-000]

Take notice that on April 24, 2000, New York State Electric & Gas Corporation (NYSEG) submitted a Complaint pursuant to Section 206 of the Federal Power Act against the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) and a request for an emergency technical conference. The Complaint seeks to suspend market-based rates and to require suppliers within the New York Control Area (NYCA) to use cost-based bids for energy markets in the NYCA, or alternative proposed remedies, in advance of the summer peak season.

Copies of the filing were served upon the NYISO and other interested parties.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or protests must be filed on or before May 5, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Answers to the complaint shall also be due on or before May 5, 2000.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr., 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10718 Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony Jurak, the Chief
Executive Officer and principal financial officer of Jurak Corporation World Wide, Inc.
(the Company) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Companys
Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended May 31, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|Date: September 16, 2005 |  | Signed: /s/ Anthony Jurak                                      | 
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                         |  |                                                               
|                         |  | Name: Anthony Jurak                                            | 
|                         |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as
separate desclosure documents. A signed original of this written statement has
been provided to Jurak Corporation World Wide, Inc. and will be retained by
Jurak Corporation World Wide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal L 8I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 008I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6210 January 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 008I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6210 January 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2019/26 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 January 2019 complementing Union type-approval legislation with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2019/26 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 January 2019 complementing Union type-approval legislation with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4(j)

                 NATIONWIDE LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY OF AMERICA

                                      RIDER

                     4 YEAR SURVIVORSHIP TERM LIFE INSURANCE



  POLICY NUMBER  9,000,000                        RIDER ISSUE DATE  09/01/2002


This Rider is attached to and made part of this Policy.

The Company will pay the Beneficiary the Rider Death Benefit upon receipt of due
proof of both Insureds' death on or before the Expiry Date of this Rider,
subject to the terms and conditions set forth below. Unless otherwise provided,
the Owner and Beneficiary of this rider are the same as the Owner and
Beneficiary of the Policy to which this Rider is attached.

RIDER DEATH BENEFIT. The death benefit of this Rider is an amount equal to 1.25
multiplied by the Face amount of the Policy, as shown in the Policy Schedule.

EXPIRY DATE. The Expiry Date of this Rider is the end of the fourth Policy Year.

COST. The cost of insurance for this Rider is included in the monthly deductions
for the Policy to which this Rider is attached. It is determined by multiplying
the monthly cost of insurance rate divided by 1,000 by the Rider Death Benefit.
The monthly deduction for this Rider will cease upon the termination of this
Rider.

The monthly cost of insurance rate is based on each Insured's Sex, Issue Age and
Premium Class and the Rider's duration. Monthly cost of insurance rates will be
determined by us, based on our expectations as to future mortality costs and
expenses. Any change in cost of insurance rates will be in accordance with the
Changes In Policy Cost Factors Provision of the Policy. The cost of insurance
rates will never be greater than the Guaranteed Monthly Rider Cost Per $1,000 of
Insurance Amount shown in the Policy Schedule.

CHANGE IN RIDER DEATH BENEFIT. After the first Policy Year, the amount of this
Rider may decrease if the Face Amount of the Policy is decreased. The death
benefit of the Rider will always equal 1.25 multiplied by the Face Amount shown
in the Policy Schedule.

TERMINATION. This rider will terminate:

1. upon written request;

2. on its Expiry Date or the prior surrender or other termination of the Policy
   to which it is attached; or

3. upon exercise of the Policy Split Option Rider, if included with the Policy
   to which this Rider is attached.

Attached by Nationwide Life and Annuity Company of America on the issue date of
this Rider.

                                                                /s/ GARY MCMAHAN
                                                                       President

Form PLC309                                                              (11.96)
#### DUNKLE v. JONES.

Assumpsit — agreement to pay in land — liability for the money, if neglect.

Where one having the money of another gets the privilege of paying by a conveyance of land, which he neglects to do, his liability for money remains unaffected by such privilege.

Assumpsit. Upon an agreed state of facts, it appeared that the defendant had received one hundred and seventy-five dollars for the plaintiff’s use, and had afterwards agreed that he would come to Washington and convey him land for it, which he has not done.

By the Court.

We see no ground for refusing judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant received the plaintiff’s money, - and he gave *him the privilege to*-pay it, by a conveyance in land, which he has not chosen to avail himself of, so the liability for the money remains in full force.
§ 111.105 Evaluation of pilot records. ( a ) Except as provided in § 111.115, no reviewing entity may permit an individual to begin service as a pilot until the reviewing entity has evaluated all relevant information in the PRD.
( b ) Evaluation must include review of all of the following information pertaining to that pilot: ( 1 ) All FAA records in the PRD as described in § 111.135.
( 2 ) All records in the PRD submitted by a reporting entity.
( 3 ) All motor vehicle driving records obtained in accordance with § 111.110.
( 4 ) The employment history the pilot provides to the PRD in accordance with subpart D of this part. If, upon review of the employment history provided by the pilot and the records described in (b)(2) of this section, a reviewing entity determines that records might be available that the pilot's previous employer has not yet uploaded in the database, the reviewing entity must submit a request to the pilot's previous employer(s) through the PRD to report any applicable records in accordance with the process in § 111.215(b).
Exhibit 99.16





CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON








Golden Star Resources Ltd.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Golden Star Resources Ltd.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





I hereby consent to (i) the use of my name in connection with the following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Form 40-F”) of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) to which this consent relates: (A) the technical report entitled “43-101 Technical Report for the Prestea West Reef Feasibility Study, Ghana” effective date May 1, 2013 and filed on July 26, 2013 (the “Report”), (B) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2013 and (C) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2013, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from such documents and Report in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-175542, 333-169047, 333-118958, 333-105821 and 333-105820), as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.








/s/ Michael Beare


Michael Beare





March 25, 2014
#### § 410.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 410.150, no qualified handicapped person shall, because the agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by handicapped persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the agency.
^_ ^_

^_

^_

^_

^_

^_

^_

^_

Harlowton

Roundup

Pompeys

 Pillar

Big Timber

Billings

Columbus

Bridger

Frannie

Renewable Energy

Alternative C

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings 

Field 

Office

Map 155

Miles

0 5 10 20 30 40

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

T

10

N

T

1

N

T

1

S

T

8

S

R17E R29E R23E Montana R105W R99W R93W Wyoming T

57

N

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Legend

Map scale 1:1,350,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

Ü This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Montana Wyoming State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Avoidance

Open

Interstate

Highway

^_ Towns

Public Lands Survey System

Exclusion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: In re Prophet Ronald Dwayne Whitfield, Relator

Appellate case numbers: 01-15-00677-CR

Trial court case numbers: 617718

Trial courts: 174th District Court of Harris County

The en banc court has voted to deny relator’s motion for second rehearing and for 

reconsideration en banc, construed together as his motion for en banc reconsideration of 

the memorandum opinion, issued on August 25, 2015, denying relator’s petition for writ 

of mandamus.

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

  Acting for the En Banc Court*

Date: October 8, 2015

* En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, 

Bland, Massengale, Brown, Huddle, and Lloyd.