alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 11
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

§ 11.103 What exemption relief may be available to federal, state, and local governments when operating aircraft that are not public aircraft? The Federal Aviation Administration may grant a federal, state, or local government an exemption from part A of subtitle VII of title 49 United States Code, and any regulation issued under that authority that is applicable to an aircraft as a result of the Independent Safety Board Act Amendments of 1994, Public Law 103-411, if— ( a ) The Administrator finds that granting the exemption is necessary to prevent an undue economic burden on the unit of government; and
( b ) The Administrator certifies that the aviation safety program of the unit of government is effective and appropriate to ensure safe operations of the type of aircraft operated by the unit of government.
[68 FR 25488, May 13, 2003]
**Exhibit 10.1****THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE**     THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE (this “Amendment”) is made as of the Amendment Date (ashereinafter defined) by and between TOWER PLACE, L.P., a Georgia limited partnership (“Landlord”)and RMS TITANIC, INC., a Florida corporation (“Tenant”).**RECITALS**     Landlord and Tenant have previously entered into that certain Tower Place Office Lease datedMarch 27, 2000 as amended by that certain First Amendment of Lease dated August 8, 2003 and furtheramended by that certain Second Amendment to Lease dated November 8, 2005 (collectively, the“Lease”) for the lease of approximately 6,086 rentable square feet of space, more commonly known asSuite 2250 Tower Place, 3340 Peachtree Road, NE (the “Existing Premises”) located within TowerPlace, Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia.     Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the Lease as more particularly set forth below.     NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good andvaluable consideration in hand paid by each party hereto to the other, the receipt and sufficiencyof which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows:**1. Definitions.**All capitalized terms used herein but undefined shall have the meaning as definedin the Lease. For purposes of the Lease, and this Amendment, the following term shall mean thefollowing:     “Landlord Entities” shall mean Landlord, Landlord’s investment manager, and the trustees,boards of directors, officers, general partners, beneficiaries, stockholders, employees and agentsof each of them.**2. Expansion Space.**Commencing on May 1, 2006 (the “Effective Date”), the Premises shall beexpanded to also include that certain additional space as more particularly described onExhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the “Second ExpansionSpace”) containing approximately 3,563 rentable square feet. Commencing on the Effective Date, thePremises shall be defined as the Existing Premises, the Expansion Space and the Second ExpansionSpace and shall consist of an agreed area of 9,649 rentable square feet.**3. Change in Tenant’s Share.**Commencing on the Effective Date, Tenant’s Share (as defined inSection 1.1(k) of the Lease) shall be increased to 1.58%.**4. Rent.**     (a) As of the Effective Date, the Base Rental for the Second Expansion Space shall be payableaccording to the following schedule:                   **Period** **Rentable Square** **Annual Base Rental** **Annual Base** **Monthly Installment****from** **through** **Footage** **Per Square Foot** **Rental** **of Base Rental**5/1/2006 8/31/2006  3,563  $24.69  $87,970.44  $7,330.87 9/1/2006 8/31/2007  3,563  $25.43  $90,609.60  $7,550.80 9/1/2007 8/31/2008  3,563  $26.19  $93,327.84  $7,777.32 9/1/2008 2/28/2009  3,563  $26.98  $96,127.68  $8,010.64      (b) All Rent payable by Tenant shall be paid to Landlord at the following address:
 

 
   If by U.S. Mail: Tower Place, L.P.
|                              |         |                           |         | Name under  |
|-----------------------------------|--------------|--------------------------------|--------------|-----------------------|
|                              |         | State or other  |         | which subsidiary |
|                              |         | jurisdiction of      |         | conducts         |
| Name of Subsidiary      |         | incorporation                  |         |  business        |
| Innodata Isogen (Private) Limited |         | India                          |         | Same                  |
| Innodata Knowledge Services, Inc. |         | Philippines                    |         | Same                  |
| ESS Manufacturing Company, Inc.   |         | Philippines                    |         | Same                  |
| Innodata Asia Holdings, Limited   |    | Bermuda                        |    | Same                  |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chell Group Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ending November 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
Bolink, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ David Bolink
    -----------------------------------------------
    David Bolink
    Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board

November 29, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Chell Group Corporation and will
be retained by Chell Group Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DhPi onmspomm 

r i O M 

JAN 2 6 2010 

^BARINQ DOCKET 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 

7^^' 

?^^ 

In the Matter of: 

Mesa Airlines, Inc. 

+ 

* 

* 

FAA Docket No. CP05SW0018 y 

FA_A Docket No. CP09SW0002 ' ^OOyO.J;!'?^ 

FAA Case No. 2004SW070040 

FAA Case No. 2007SW070069 

ALJ Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE 

COMESJ NOW the Administrator and files this Motion for Continuance and as 

cause thereof would show the following. 

I. 

A hearing date of January 25 and 26, 2010, has been set for the above captioned 

cases, 

H. 

The Respondent, Mesa Airlines, filed a Petition for Bankruptcy on January 5, 

2010. 

II. 

The paities are in the process of settling the cases but must wait the approval of the 

Bankrupty Trustee. Considering the extenuating circiunstances, a continuance in 

these cases would be in the best interest of all parties concerned. 

eoo/Loo® SWQ * VVJ St'LSSGfrSOS XVJ iS:t L 0L0S/6L/S0 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

T hereby certify that tlie original and one copy of tlic foregoing Motion for 

Continuance has been mailed January 15, 2010, by Certified Mail - Return Receipt 

Requested and tax to: 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430 

Wilbur Wrighi Building—Suite 2W1000 

1 hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion for Continuance, has been mailed 

Januaiy 15, 2010, by Certified Mail-Return Receipt Requested, and fax to the 

following: 

Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearing, M-20, 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Christopher Pappaioanou 

Director, Legal Affairs 

Mesa Air Group 

410 North 44"^ Street, Suite 700 

Phoenix, AZ 85008 

i V ^ (J. MHL. 

Sylv^Twa 

Paralegal Specialist 

(UMMMAAA. /5J J^Of^ 

'^^^^^^® SH° ^ vvd snseGiPSos xvj ie: n OLOS/GL/SO 
WHEREFORE, BY REASON OF THE FOREGOING, the Federal Aviation 

Administration hereby prays that the Motion for Continuance be granted. 

Respectfully Submitted 

By. 

LYNETTE WORD 

Regional Counsel 

Southwest Ret 

U i'/n-^ I r -

Annjen/^t Chei6iault 

Atto^Tjfey 

817-222-5071 

soo/soo® SWQ * VVJ S1?L98GtS0S XVd ie:t L 0L0S/6L/S0
Editorial Note on Part 1251
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1251 appear at 81 FR 3709, Jan. 22, 2016.

§ 1251.104 Assurances required. ( a ) *Assurances.* An applicant for Federal financial assistance to which this part applies shall submit an assurance, on a form specified by the Associate Administrator, that the program or activity will be operated in compliance with this part. An applicant may incorporate these assurances by reference in subsequent applications to NASA.
( b ) *Duration of obligation.* ( 1 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended in the form of real property or to provide real property or structures on the property, the assurance will obligate the recipient or, in the case of a subsequent transfer, the transferee, for the period during which the real property or structures are used for the purpose for which Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits.
( 2 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended to provide personal property, the assurance will obligate the recipient for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property.
( 3 ) In all other cases, the assurance will obligate the recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended.
( c ) *Covenants.* ( 1 ) Where Federal financial assistance is provided in the form of real property or interest in the property from NASA, the instrument effecting or recording this transfer shall contain a covenant running with the land to assure nondiscrimination for the period during which the real property is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits.
( 2 ) Where no transfer of property is involved but property is purchased or improved with Federal financial assistance, the recipient shall agree to include the covenant described in paragraph (c)(3) of this section in the instrument effecting or recording any subsequent transfer of the property.
( 3 ) Where Federal financial assistance is provided in the form of real property or interest in the property from NASA, the covenant shall also include a condition coupled with a right to be reserved by NASA to revert title to the property in the event of a breach of the covenant. If a transferee of real property proposes to mortgage or otherwise encumber the real property as security for financing construction of new, or improvement of existing facilities on the property for the purposes for which the property was transferred, the Associate Administrator may, upon request of the transferee and if necessary to accomplish such financing and upon such conditions as he or she deems appropriate, agree to forbear the exercise of such right to revert title for so long as the lien of such mortgage or other encumbrance remains effective.
[51 FR 26862, July 28, 1986, as amended at 68 FR 51351, Aug. 26, 2003; 81 FR 3711, Jan. 22, 2016]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 11, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41157 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SAMUEL VASQUEZ-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-2321-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Samuel VasquezMendoza raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40808

Conference Calendar

LONNIE R WHITLEY

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

PAUL KASTNER, Warden

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:07-CV-32

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lonnie R. Whitley, federal prisoner # 04545-033, appeals the district

court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the 420-month

sentence he received following his 1997 conviction for conspiracy to manufacture

methamphetamine, using and carrying a firearm in connection with a drugtrafficking crime, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. He renews his

claim that he was improperly sentenced and asserts that a fundamental

miscarriage of justice will result from the failure to consider the merits of his

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 19, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-40808

2

claim. However, even if his brief is liberally construed, Whitley makes no

argument that the district court erred in determining that he did not meet the

criteria for raising his claims in this § 2241 petition pursuant to the savings

clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). He has thus abandoned the only issue on appeal

by failing to brief it. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993).

The appeal is without arguable merit, see Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215,

219-20 (5th Cir. 1983), and is dismissed as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
EX-99.1

(Logo) PricewaterhouseCoopers

PricewaterhouseCoopers
llP 214 N.Tryon Street

Ste 3600
Charlotte NC 28202

Telephone (704) 344 7500
Facsimile (704) 344 4100


Report of Independent Accountants

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Bank of America, N.A.

We have examined management's assertion about compliance by the mortgage
division of Bank of America, N.A. (the "Company"), an operating division of Bank
of America, N.A., with the minimum servicing standards identified in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003
included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit 1). Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31,2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PriceWaterhouseCoopers
--------------------------------
March 2, 2004

Bank of America

<PAGE>

Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance
with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards

March 2, 2004

As of and for the year ended December 31,2003, the Mortgage division of Bank of
America, N.A. (the "Company"), has complied in all material respects with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP").

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and
errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $340,000,000 and $270,000,000,
respectively.

/s/ Ashish Kamit
--------------------------------
Ashish Kamit

Senior Vice President and Managing Director
Bank of America, N .A.

/s/ J Mark Hanson
--------------------------------
J Mark Hanson
Senior Vice President
Bank of America, N .A.

/S/ H Randell Chestnut
--------------------------------
Senior Vice President
Bank of America, N.A.

Gary K Bettin
--------------------------------
Senior Vice President and National Servicing Executive Bank of America, N .A.

/s/ Kevin M Shannon
--------------------------------
Kevin M. Shannon
President
Consumer Real Estate

Bank of America, N.A.
USA
[Olympic rings]
2000-2004
US Olympic Teams
§ 121.711 Communication records: Domestic and flag operations. ( a ) Each certificate holder conducting domestic or flag operations must record each en route communication between the certificate holder and its pilots using a communication system as required by § 121.99 of this part.
( b ) For purposes of this section the term en route means from the time the aircraft pushes back from the departing gate until the time the aircraft reaches the arrival gate at its destination.
( c ) The record required in paragraph (a) of this section must contain at least the following information: ( 1 ) The date and time of the contact;
( 2 ) The flight number;
( 3 ) Aircraft registration number;
( 4 ) Approximate position of the aircraft during the contact;
( 5 ) Call sign; and
( 6 ) Narrative of the contact.
( d ) The record required in paragraph (a) of this section must be kept for at least 30 days.
[Doc. No. FAA-2008-0677, 78 FR 67841, Nov. 12, 2013]
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24305 Filed:05/19/23 Entered:05/24/23 15:35:09 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24305 Filed:05/19/23 Entered:05/24/23 15:35:09 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24305 Filed:05/19/23 Entered:05/24/23 15:35:09 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of Broadwing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kim D. Larsen, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title
18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                    |  |  |  |                  
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: March 4, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Kim D. Larsen
|                    |  |  |  | Kim D. Larsen
Exhibit 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, James A. Clark, the chief
financial officer of Critical Path, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 13, 2007



/s/    JAMES A.
CLARKJames A. Clark Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been
provided to Critical Path, Inc. and will be retained by Critical Path, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.