alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Knott *v.*The State.

*Assault and Battery.*

(Decided April 9, 1914.

65 South. 83.)

1. *Appeal and Error; Harmless Error; Evidence.*— Where there was testimony admitted without objection as to certain matter about which there was no conflict at that time, the admission of testimony of substantially the same facts subsequently, was harmless.

2. *Assa-ult and Battery; Evidence; Motive.*— As showing the relation of the parties, as tending to disclose the motive, and as aiding in identifying defendant as the perpetrator of the assault, evidence that he had, over the objection of the assaulted person been coming to the latter’s house to see his wife, was admissible, the defense being that of alibi.

*78Appeal from Greene Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Bernard Harwood.

John Knott was convicted of assault with intent to murder and he appeals.

Affirmed.

Elmore & Herbert, for appellant.

Counsel discuss the evidence and insist that the court was in error in permitting the wife of the assaulted party to testify whether the defendant had ever been over there before to see her, but cite no authority in support of their contention.

R. C. Briokell, Attorney General, and T. H. Seay, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

The evidence objected to is competent on the question of mo*tive.*— Kelso *v. State,*47 Ala. 573; *Hudson v. State,*61 Ala. 333; *Long v. State,*86 Ala. 37. It was also competent on the theory of identification.

PELHAM, J.

The assaulted party, one Willis Brown, testified' without objection that the defendant had been coming to his house before the occasion of the assault, and that he had told him to stay away. The testimony was without conflict on this matter, and prejudicial error could not result in subsequently allowing proof of substantially the same facts- against the objection of the defendant by the wife of Willis Brown when she was examined as a witness for 'the state.

Permitting the state’s witness Ida Brown, the wife of the assaulted party, Willis Brown, to testify that the defendant had, prior to the assault, been coming to her husband’s house to see her is the only error insisted upon by the defendant’s counsel as shown by the record in this case. Aside from what we have said in the *79first paragraph of oar opinion as to this not being-shown to constitute prejudicial error requiring a reversal of the case, we may remark that it was proper to make this proof under the facts presented, for the purpose of showing- the relations existing' between the parties as tending to disclose a motive for the act, and as an aid in identifying the defendant as the perpetrator; his defense being an attempt to prove an alibi.

We find no error presented by the record, and the case will be affirmed.

Affirmed.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3592

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to condition 

receipt of funds under part A of title V of such Act by a State on 

the State requiring successful completion of courses in American history 

and American government as a prerequisite to high school graduation, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2003

Mr. DAVIS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to condition receipt of funds under part A of 

title V of such Act by a State on the State requiring 

successful completion of courses in American history and 

American government as a prerequisite to high school 

graduation, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3592 IH 

1 SECTION 1. COMPLETION OF CERTAIN COURSES FOR HIGH 

2 SCHOOL GRADUATION. 

3 Section 5111 of the Elementary and Secondary Edu4 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7211) is amended by add5 ing at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—No State educational agency or 

7 outlying area shall be eligible to receive funds under this 

8 section unless the State or area requires all students who 

9 graduate from a public secondary school with a regular 

10 diploma in the standard number of years or fewer to have 

11 successfully completed secondary school courses in Amer12 ican history and American government.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 14(a)(1)(i)

                                 [MIDLAND LOGO]

                                     MIDLAND
                               LOAN SERVICES INC.

    Report of Management Compliance with the Minimum Servicing Standards Set
      Forth in the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

We, as members of management of Midland Loan Services, Inc. (MLS), a wholly
owned subsidiary of PNC Bank Corp. (PNCBC), are responsible for complying with
the minimum servicing standards as set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association
of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP)
except for commercial loan and multifamily servicing, minimum servicing
standards V.4 and VI.1, which the Mortgage Bankers Association of America has
interpreted as inapplicable to such servicing. We are also responsible for
establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with
these standards. We have performed an evaluation of MLS' compliance with the
minimum servicing standards as set forth in the USAP as of December 31, 1998 and
for the year then ended. Based on this evaluation, we assert that during the
year ended December 31, 1998, MLS complied, in all material respects, with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in the USAP except as described below.

With regard to standard I.4, reconciling items exist which have not been
resolved within ninety calendar days of their original identification.

As of and for this same period, PNCBC had in effect a fidelity bond in the
amount of $300,000,000 and an error and omissions policy in the amount of
$20,000,000.


                                                    /s/ C.J. Sipple
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    C.J. Sipple
                                                    Senior Vice President


                                                    /s/ Paula J. Mickelson
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Paula J. Mickelson
                                                    Vice President

March 30, 1999


210 W. 10th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 Phone: 816/435-5000 FAX: 816/435-2327


                                       -9-
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Diane Knowles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Diane S. Knowles   
|    |  | Diane S. Knowles       
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | March 26, 2008         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Killbuck Bancshares,
Inc. and will be retained by Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 11

- 00491

- CR

Robert Lee Bowen

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 4

o f Tarr ant County (1193437R )

July 25, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gardner

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment . It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

S ECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_________________________________ Justice Anne Gardner
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James E. Illson, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bell Microproducts
Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

       (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

       (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

       (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

       (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

       (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  March 15, 2004                     /s/ James E. Illson
                                          Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit A

Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico’s Exhibit and Demonstrative List

in Connection with the Disclosure Statement Hearing

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23594-1 Filed:02/21/23 Entered:02/21/23 16:18:04 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 2
Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico’s Exhibit and Demonstrative List

in Connection with the Disclosure Statement Hearing

Demonstrative/ 

Exhibit No. Description

Demonstratives

FOMB 

Demonstrative 

No. 1

Summary of Discovery Deadlines3

Exhibits

FOMB Ex. 1 Omnibus Reply Chart4

FOMB Ex. 2 Supplemental Omnibus Reply Chart5

FOMB Ex. 3

Disclosure Statement Information Relating to New Bonds 

and CVI6

3 FOMB Demonstrative No. 1 reflects a summary of the proposed discovery deadlines in decretal paragraph 34 of

the Motion of Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority for Order Establishing, Among Other Things, Procedures and 

Deadlines Concerning Objections to Confirmation and Discovery in Connection Therewith [ECF No. 3114 in Case 

No. 17-4780].

4 FOMB Ex. 1 is not attached hereto, FOMB Ex. 1 was filed at ECF No. 3206-1 in Case No. 17-4780. 

5 FOMB Ex. 2 is not attached hereto, FOMB Ex. 2 was filed at ECF No. 3246-1 in Case No. 17-4780. 

6 FOMB Ex. 3 is not attached hereto, FOMB Ex. 3 was filed at ECF No. 3246-3 in Case No. 17-4780.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23594-1 Filed:02/21/23 Entered:02/21/23 16:18:04 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Form 10-K”)of Cardinal Financial Corporation, I, Bernard H. Clineburg, Chairman, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

(a)   the Form 10-Kfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)   the information contained in the Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial conditionand results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for,the periods presented in the Form 10-K.
| Date: March 11, 2005 | ** **                |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|
| ** **                | /s/ BERNARD H.  CLINEBURG |   |
| ** **                | Bernard H. Clineburg      |
|                      | *Chairman, President and* |
|                      | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 40265 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Jorge Damian Soliz, Jr.,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:20
- CR
- 1105 - 1

**____________ __________________**  Before **Elrod, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Damian Soliz, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Soliz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rel evant portions of the record reflected therein. We

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 6, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-40265 Document: 56-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/06/2024No. 23
- 40265

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further respo nsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-40265 Document: 56-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/06/2024
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. 1350)





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned
      officer of Modern Medical Modalities Corporation, a New Jersey corporation
      (the
      "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
      belief, that:





1.
      The
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Form
      10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all materials
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:
                  April 15, 2008
              /s/
                  Minesh PatelMinesh
                  Patel, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating
                  Officer


This
      certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
      Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
      any
      filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3659

To amend title 38, United States Code, to enact into law eligibility of 

certain Reservists and their dependents for burial in Arlington National 

Cemetery. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2003

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. EVANS, Mr. BROWN of South 

Carolina, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, 

Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, and Mr. SHIMKUS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to enact into law 

eligibility of certain Reservists and their dependents for 

burial in Arlington National Cemetery.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Reservists Burial Equity 

5 Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 3659 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN PERSONS FOR BURIAL IN 

2 ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Chapter 24 of title 38, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new section: 

6 ‘‘§ 2412. Arlington National Cemetery: eligibility of 

7 certain persons for burial 

8 ‘‘(a)(1) The remains of a member or former member 

9 of a reserve component of the Armed Forces who at the 

10 time of death was under 60 years of age and who, but 

11 for age, would have been eligible at the time of death for 

12 retired pay under chapter 1223 of title 10 may be buried 

13 in Arlington National Cemetery on the same basis as the 

14 remains of members of the Armed Forces entitled to re15 tired pay under that chapter. 

16 ‘‘(2) The remains of the dependents of a member 

17 whose remains are permitted under paragraph (1) to be 

18 buried in Arlington National Cemetery may be buried in 

19 that cemetery on the same basis as dependents of mem20 bers of the Armed Forces entitled to retired pay under 

21 such chapter 1223. 

22 ‘‘(b)(1) The remains of a member of a reserve compo23 nent of the Armed Forces who dies in the line of duty 

24 while performing active duty for training or inactive duty 

25 training may be buried in Arlington National Cemetery 
3

•HR 3659 IH 

1 on the same basis as the remains of a member of the 

2 Armed Forces who dies while on active duty. 

3 ‘‘(2) The remains of the dependents of a member 

4 whose remains are permitted under paragraph (1) to be 

5 buried in Arlington National Cemetery may be buried in 

6 that cemetery on the same basis as dependents of mem7 bers on active duty.’’. 

8 (2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 

9 24 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 

10 at the end the following new item:

‘‘2412. Arlington National Cemetery: eligibility of certain persons for burial.’’.

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 2412 of title 38, 

12 United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall 

13 apply with respect to interments occurring on or after the 

14 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
LTS Doc#:24228-1 Filed:05/15/23 Entered:05/18/23 1

Envelope Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

MIDDLE BAY OIL COMPANY, INC.
Statement of Computation of Per-Share Earnings
For the Year Ended December 31, 1997


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Fully
                               Primary              Diluted
                            --------------       --------------
<S>                         <C>                  <C>
Net Income                  $  (15,579,340)      $  (15,579,340)
                            --------------       --------------
Adjusted Net Income         $  (15,579,340)      $  (15,579,340)
                            ==============       ==============

Divided by:

Weighted Average Shares          3,397,117            3,397,117

Adjusted Weighted Average
  Shares                         3,397,117            3,397,117
                           ---------------        -------------

Earnings Per Share         $         (4.76)       $       (4.76)
                           ===============        =============
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24942-24943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10636]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability of U.S. Patents for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or 
Partially-Exclusive Licensing

AGENCY: U.S. Army Research Laboratory, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6, announcement is made of the 
availability of the following U.S. patent for non-exclusive, partially 
exclusive or exclusive licensing. The listed patent has been assigned 
to the United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the 
Army, Washington, DC.
    This patent covers a wide variety of technical arts including: a 
device to launch disk projectiles in a variety of orientations, A spin 
stabilized non-lethal projectile and An apparatus to allow pilots 
increased visibility through fog and other aerosols.
    Under the authority of Section 11(a)(2) of the Federal Technology 
Transfer Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-502) and Section 207 of Title 35, 
United States Code, the Department of the Army as represented by the 
U.S. Army Research Laboratory wish to license the U.S. patent listed 
below in a non-exclusive, exclusive or partially exclusive manner to 
any party interested in manufacturing, using, and/or selling devices or 
processes covered by this patent.

    Title: Launcher and Method for Launching Disk-Shaped Projectile in 
Edge-On and Face-On Orientations.
    Inventors: Michael Hollis and John Condon.
    Patent Number: 6,024,078.
    Issued Date: February 15, 2000.

    Title: Method and Apparatus for Increased Visibility through Fog 
and Ohter Aerosols.

[[Page 24943]]

    Inventor: Wendell Watkins.
    Patent Number: 6,028,624.
    Issued Date: February 22, 2000.

    Title: Non-Lethal Cartridge with Spin-Stabilized Projectile.
    Inventor: David H. Lyon.
    Patent Number: 6,041,712.
    Issued Date: March 28, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Rausa, Technology Transfer 
Office, AMSRL-CS-TT, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving 
Ground, MD 21005-5055 tel: (410) 278-5028; fax: (410) 278-5820

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-10636 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M