alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-50376

Summary Calendar

_____________________

GARY G. WRIGHT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

K. C. LOVE, Doctor,

Boyd Unit,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-95-CV-79

_________________________________________________________________

October 25, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gary Gene Wright, # 612278, appeals from the district court’s

order dismissing his civil rights actions as frivolous pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). He argues that Dr. Love was

deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation

of the Eighth Amendment. We have reviewed the record and Wright’s
-2-

brief and affirm the district court’s dismissal for essentially the

reasons adopted by the district court. Wright v. Love, No.

W-95-CV-79 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 24, 1996). We do not address Wright’s

retaliation claim because it does not rise to the level of plain

error. See Robertson v. Plano City of Tex., 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th

Cir. 1995).

Wright presents no legal points arguable on their merits, and

the appeal is frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220

(5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED.

See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2. We previously warned Wright in Wright v.

Carpenter, No. 95-10951 (5th Cir. Apr. 12, 1996), that further

prosecution of frivolous matters in this court would invite the

imposition of sanctions and cautioned him to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they did not raise frivolous arguments.

Wright has not heeded this warning. Accordingly, Wright is barred

from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis civil appeal in this

court, or any pro se, in forma pauperis, initial civil pleading in

any court that is subject to this court’s jurisdiction, without the

advance written permission of a judge of the forum court; the clerk

of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts in this

circuit are directed to return to Wright, unfiled, any attempted

submission inconsistent with this bar.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION IMPOSED.
-3-
This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is

made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the 

accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for individual

or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended

by BLM. This map may not meet National Map Accuracy 

Standards. This product was developed through digital

means and information may be updated without notification.

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in March 2014

0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5

Miles

Dry Cr

Dry Cr

(

Pryor Mountain Road

Jack Creek

r

31 36 31 31 Dry C 36 31 36 Sage

36 Creek

S

6 o1 6 6 u

1 H

6 u

1 t

n

h

t

F

C

o

r

r

e

k

ek

1

£¤

Bear Creek

ek

Cre e

Belfry ga

^ C

S

ottonwood

Creek Road

Jack Cre

Wol

C

ek

f Cr

o

eek

ttonw

W

oo

il

d

li

C

am

reek

s

Ro

Draw Roa

ad

31 36 31 31 d

36 31 36

Cub

36 Creek

Cott

6 ek o

e

n

1 6 6 r

w

1 6 1 C

o

sr

od

e

 C

Grove Creek

t n

re

C

u

e

o

k 

t

H

R

to

o

n

1 ad

wood Creek

Silver

Cot

T

t

i

on

p

wo

R

od

o

 C

a

re

d

ek Road

dao

Creek R

d

woo

Dil

T

w

on

or

Cott

t

9 h Cre

S ek

(

Silve

H

r

unt Cree

T

k 

i

Ro

p

ad

Creek

daoR wa

31 rD

31 36 31 36 31 s

36

mail

36 lWi

6

Route information and proposed management actions in this 

document only apply to Bureau of Land Management lands.

No route designations will be made on non-federal or private lands.

 The information on this map is developed from a variety of

 data sources and input scales may cause some misalignment of 

data layers. This map is for planning purposes only, and not 

intended for on-ground travel. 1:60,000

Wyoming

T

7

S

310

T

8

S

r e v

R

i

s t o n e

o

w

Y e

l l

r k

Fo

s k r a

C l

72

Montana

Wyoming

R22E R23E R24E

R101W R100W R99W

Location Map

Legend

Montana

Billings 

Field 

Office

±

State Boundary

Recommended Routes

Highway

Roads

Streams

Lakes

Bureau of Land Management

State Parks and Recreation

Division of State Lands

Water

Public Lands Survey System

Private

72

Cottonwood / Weatherman Travel Management Area

Cottonwood / Weatherman

Travel Management Area 

Alternative B

Map 136

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Closed to All Vehicles

Open to Motorcycles Only

Open with Additional Management

Administrative Use Only
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2022 KW 0454

VERSUS

MARION DALE JONES JUNE 21, 2022

In Re: Marion Dale Jones, applying for supervisory writs, 

20th Judicial District Court, Parish of West

Feliciana, No. 22- WCR- 083. 

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., GUIDRY AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. The trial court lacked jurisdiction. 

Relator' s claim is in the nature of a request for postconviction

relief, which must be filed in the parish of conviction. See

La. Code Crim. P. art. 925; State v. Ricks, 2018- 0071 ( La. App. 

1st Cir. 3/ 6/ 18), 2018 WL 1168558 ( unpublished). 

VGW

JMG

EW

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

01 . C. 

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - BALANCE SHEETS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND
THE AUDITED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,587,184
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,325,138
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,223,099
<PP&E>                                      63,491,552
<DEPRECIATION>                             (30,636,202)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,252,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,890,931
<BONDS>                                      9,714,713
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       10,000,000
<PREFERRED>                                  3,627,000
<COMMON>                                        90,392
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,023,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,252,572
<SALES>                                     11,432,995
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,432,995
<CGS>                                        5,190,073
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,190,073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,881,093
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             671,081
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (23,024,138)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (6,319,256)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (16,704,882)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (5.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (5.10)


</TABLE>
#### § 121.107 Dispatch centers.

Each certificate holder conducting domestic or flag operations must show that it has enough dispatch centers, adequate for the operations to be conducted, that are located at points necessary to ensure proper operational control of each flight.

[Doc. No. 28154, 61 FR 2610, Jan. 26, 1996]
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/international/Agreement_Pamphlets/documents/Slovak_Republic.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/international/Agreement_Pamphlets/documents/Slovak_Republic.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### § 121.356 Collision avoidance system.

Effective January 1, 2005, any airplane you operate under this part must be equipped and operated according to the following table:

Collision Avoidance Systems

| If you operate any— | Then you must operate that airplane with— |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Turbine-powered airplane of more than 33,000 pounds maximum certificated takeoff weight | (1) An appropriate class of Mode S transponder that meets Technical Standard Order (TSO) C-112, or a later version, and one of the following approved units: (i) TCAS II that meets TSO C-119b (version 7.0), or takeoff weight a later version. |
| | (ii) TCAS II that meets TSO C-119a (version 6.04A Enhanced) that was installed in that airplane before May 1, 2003. If that TCAS II version 6.04A Enhanced no longer can be repaired to TSO C-119a standards, it must be replaced with a TCAS II that meets TSO C-119b (version 7.0), or a later version. (iii) A collision avoidance system equivalent to TSO C-119b (version 7.0), or a later version, capable of coordinating with units that meet TSO C-119a (version 6.04A Enhanced), or a later version. |
| (b) Passenger or combination cargo/passenger (combi) airplane that has a passenger seat configuration of 10-30 seats | (1) TCAS I that meets TSO C-118, or a later version, or (2) A collision avoidance system equivalent to has a TSO C-118, or a later version, or (3) A collision avoidance system and Mode S transponder that meet [paragraph (a)(1)](/on/2024-09-19/title-14/section-121.356#p-121.356(a)(1)) of this section. |
| (c) Piston-powered airplane of more than 33,000 pounds maximum certificated takeoff weight | (1) TCAS I that meets TSO C-118, or a later version, or (2) A collision avoidance system equivalent to maximum TSO C-118, or a later version, or (3) A collision avoidance system and Mode S transponder that meet [paragraph (a)(1)](/on/2024-09-19/title-14/section-121.356#p-121.356(a)(1)) of this section. |

[Doc. No. FAA-2001-10910, [68 FR 15902](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/68-FR-15902), Apr. 1, 2003]
§ 121.363 Responsibility for airworthiness. ( a ) Each certificate holder is primarily responsible for— ( 1 ) The airworthiness of its aircraft, including airframes, aircraft engines, propellers, appliances, and parts thereof; and
( 2 ) The performance of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration of its aircraft, including airframes, aircraft engines, propellers, appliances, emergency equipment, and parts thereof, in accordance with its manual and the regulations of this chapter.
( b ) A certificate holder may make arrangements with another person for the performance of any maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alterations. However, this does not relieve the certificate holder of the responsibility specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19210, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-106, 38 FR 22378, Aug. 20, 1973]
# Official Journal L 336/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.336.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 336 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5614 December 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.336.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 336

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5614 December 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1269/2013 of 5 December 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 802/2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1269/2013 of 5 December 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 802/2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal C 74A/3 Ma

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 74A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 643 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 74A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 643 March 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2021/C 74 A/01 | Recruitment Notice PE/255/S – English-language clear language professional (AD 7) (female or male) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2021/C 74 A/01

Recruitment Notice PE/255/S – English-language clear language professional (AD 7) (female or male)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 15.(b).1**Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves**Amount in NOK million                           Additions        Balance at     Charged to     Balance at  beginning of Charged to costs other accounts     end ofDescription period and expenses 1) 2) Deductions1) 3) period Year-end december 31, 2006                    Allowance for doubtful accounts  784   145   -1   -115   813 Valuation allowance for deferred taxassets  2,591   -681   234       2,144 Asset retirement obligation  7,694   442   4,217   -293   12,060                      Year-end december 31, 2005                    Allowance for doubtful accounts  891   225   - 99   -233   784 Valuation allowance for deferred taxassets  967   1,054   570       2,591 Asset retirement obligation 4)  6,281   404   1,365   -356   7,694                      Year-end december 31, 2004                    Allowance for doubtful accounts  922   200   39   -269   891 Valuation allowance for deferred taxassets  1,047   -25   -55       967 Asset retirement obligation  5,235   351   914   -219   6,281  1) Amounts for 2005 and 2004 include Castings classified as discontinued operations in 2006 2) Includes amounts recognized as assets held for sale, in business combinations, and foreigncurrency translation adjustments. 3) Deductions primarily represent uncollectible accounts charged against the allowance fordoubtful accounts and expenditures related to and reductions of asset retirement obligations. 4) Hydro implemented FASB Interpretation (FIN) No . 47 Accounting for Conditional Asset RetirementObligations beginning 31 December 2005. FIN 47 is an interpretation of SFAS 143 Accounting forAsset Retirement Obligations which refers to legal obligations to perform asset retirementactivities. Effective 1 January 2003, Hydro implemented SFAS 143 for asset retirement obligations,such as decommissioning and abandonment of oil and gas production platforms, facilities andpipelines. The accounting standard requires that the fair value of future asset retirementobligations be recorded in the Company’s balance sheet in the period it is incurred; accordingly,obligations for oil and gas installations should be recognized at the start of production. Assetretirement costs are capitalized as part of the asset’s original cost and depreciated over theasset’s useful life, while changes to thepresent value of the obligations are charged to earnings. FIN 47 requires an entity to recognize aliability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation, if the fair value of theliability can be reasonably estimated, even if timing and/or method of settlement is conditional ona future event that may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47 implementation mainlyrelates to brick-lining used in primary aluminum production within Metals. The implementation ofFIN 47 resulted in an increase of asset retirement obligation liabilities by NOK 223 million.According to FIN 47 prior year amounts should not be restated.
~~D SJ; UNITEDSTATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY v~\ A.)-~\\' WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

### ;;" 

# -8

~
--= % 

# - 

# ~ ~,,~~ W :IJ ~ 0 ~ \. & PREVENTION. PESTICIDES AND "'J".d "v"~ TOXIC SUBSTANCES -'i. PRo1~



### MEMORANDUM DATE: June 19,2013 SUBJECT: Transmission of additional background materials on avian histopathology for the

June 25-28,2013 meeting of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory Panel (FIFRA SAP) to consider and review scientific issues associated with the validation of the Proposed EDSP Tier 2 Ecotoxicity Tests TO: Laura E. Bailey, M.S., Executive Secretary

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Office of Science Coordination and Policy (7201 M) Sharlene R. Matten, Ph.D., Designated Federal Official FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Staff Office of Science Coordination and Policy (720 I M) FROM: Mary Manibusan, Director 6/19/13 ~W\ <'/~/l~

Exposure Assessment, Coordination and PolIcy Division Office of Science Coordination and Policy (7203M)
This memo signifies transmission of two additional background documents on avian histopathology that will assist the members of the panel in their review of scientific issues associated with the Japanese Quail Two-Generation Toxicity Test (JQTT). These documents address histopathology of Japanese quail in the two-generation toxicity test will facilitate the consideration of the procedures described in the proposed test guideline and the results obtained in the interlaboratory evaluation with vinclozolin. These documents do not contain any information protected under the statute as Confidential Business Information (CBI) or information protected from disclosure to foreign and multi-national pesticide producers under FIFRA Section 10(g).

## 1

\

I Contains FIFRA I 10(9) or Name of Document Author(s) Date CBI Brigid V. 

### Histopathology Evaluation of Reproductive and Troan, 10 Selected Visceral and Brain Tissue from Molly H. December No the Avian 2-Generation Test in Vinclozolin Exposed Kr 

### Bo7lte, 

### R 2012 .IS en . 

### Adult Japanese QuaIl Hobbie


### , Experimental 

### DEVELOPMENT OF GUIDANCE FOR SUCCESSFUL Pathology 11 July N NECROPSY OF JAPANESE QUAIL Laboratories, 2011 0 Inc.

" t .' ; I, \ '

### j \ , ; '. "" 1\ : \ ,/ -.,'.. i ,Ii. . :.'1- f.., II;! fiti;

'!(' ,:; :';1; , : '.,! , i "i ""' j" ,i , C 1 J

"



# .

--
CENTURY ALUMINUM – HAWESVILLE, KENTUCKY PM TEST DATA

SUMMARY OF ELECTRONIC FILES SUBMITTED TO THE EPA

HAND DELIVERED TO DAVID PUTNEY ON MARCH 22, 2013

I. POTLINES 1‐4

a. Reports

i. January 2012 Emissions Testing Report (one file)

ii. November 2012 Emissions Testing Report (one file)

b. AC Stack ESP Data for January 2012 and November 2012 Testing Events (four files)

c. AC Stack Fan Amp Data for January 2012 and November 2012 Testing Events (four

files)

d. AC Stack Water Flow Data for January 2012 and November 2012 Testing Events (four

files)

e. Potline 1‐4 Data (one file)

i. Summary of Operational Pots During Testing Events

ii. Production Capacities

iii. Installation Dates

II. ANODE BAKE FURNACE

a. Reports

i. May 2011 Emissions Testing Report (one file)

ii. June 2012 Emissions Testing Report (one file)

b. Anode Bake Furnace Scrubber Monitoring Data for May 2011 and June 2012 Testing

Events (two files)

III. ICR Tables 3‐7 (one file)

IV. Figures – Potlines 1‐4 and Anode Bake Oven Schematics (two files)
# Official Journal C 3/6 Ja

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 3 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 486 January 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 3

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 486 January 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 003/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 003/2 | Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 375th meeting on 14 June 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/A.38.549 — Ordre des architectes belges | 2 |
| 2005/C 003/3 | Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 376th meeting on 21 June 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/A.38.549 — Ordre des architectes belges | 3 |
| 2005/C 003/4 | Final report of the hearing officer in Case COMP/38.549 — Architects' Association (delivered in accordance with Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of hearing officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21) | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 003/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 003/2

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 375th meeting on 14 June 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/A.38.549 — Ordre des architectes belges

th

2

2005/C 003/3

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 376th meeting on 21 June 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/A.38.549 — Ordre des architectes belges

th

3

2005/C 003/4

Final report of the hearing officer in Case COMP/38.549 — Architects' Association (delivered in accordance with Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of hearing officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

4

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10465]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-1026-001]


Indianapolis Power&Light Company; Notice of Filing

April 21, 2000.
    Take notice that on March 27, 2000, Indianapolis Power & Light 
Company (IPL) tendered for filing its compliance filing in the above-
referenced docket.
    Copies of this filing were served on the Indiana Utility Regulatory 
Commission and others as provided on the official service list.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before May 1, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10465 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M