Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices 21225 

the use of MIC in the Bayer carbamate 

pesticide manufacturing processes, 

through, for example, substitution of 

less hazardous intermediates, 

intensifying existing manufacturing 

processes, or consuming MIC 

simultaneously with its production. 

Examine these approaches using the 

best practices for inherently safer 

process assessment identified under 

Task 1. 

• Estimate projected costs of 

alternative approaches identified above. 

• Compare the inherently safer 

process assessments conducted by Bayer 

and previous owners of the Institute site 

with benchmarks established under 

Task 1. 

Deliverables 

For each task, the NAS shall provide 

a monthly progress report to the CSB 

from inception to completion. The NAS 

should promptly notify the CSB of any 

problems encountered or other matters 

that require CSB attention. 

The principal deliverable item is a 

detailed written report of the expert 

panel addressing each point in Tasks 1 

and 2, above. The report should be 

produced within 12 months of the 

initiation of the project. The panel may 

conduct public hearings in West 

Virginia, or elsewhere, as appropriate. 

Questions for Public Comment 

1. Does the proposed Task Statement 

include the appropriate topics for 

consideration by the NAS? Are there 

any additional general or specific topics 

the NAS panel will need to consider in 

order to reach a satisfactory answer on 

the feasibility and costs of reducing the 

use and storage of MIC? 

2. If funds are available, should the 

CSB initiate a second, related study to 

consider the feasibility, costs, and 

benefits of inherently safer alternatives 

to other chemicals? For example, should 

a study consider alternatives to the use 

of hydrogen fluoride in refinery 

alkylation processes and/or to the use of 

chlorine in water treatment? What other 

chemicals or processes should be 

considered if a second study is 

undertaken? 

3. What kinds of backgrounds and 

expertise should be represented on the 

NAS panel? 

4. Is the proposed timetable 

appropriate? 

Electronic Submission of Comments 

Electronic submission of comments is 

preferred. Comments should be 

submitted by e-mail to 

nascomments@csb.gov. Comments may 

be submitted in the body of the e-mail 

message or as an attached PDF, MS 

Word, or plain text ASCII file. Files 

must be virus-free and unencrypted. 

Please ensure that the comments 

themselves, whether in the body of the 

e-mail or attached as a file, include the 

docket number (CSB–10–01), the agency 

name, and your full name and address. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7412(r)(6)(F), (N); 

Pub. L. 111–88, 123 Stat. 2950. 

Dated: April 19, 2010. 

Christopher W. Warner, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2010–9422 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6350–01–P 

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS 

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting 

of the Utah Advisory Committee 

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 

the provisions of the rules and 

regulations of the U.S. Commission on 

Civil Rights (Commission), and the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(FACA), that a planning meeting of the 

Utah Advisory Committee to the 

Commission will convene by conference 

call at 10 a.m. on Thursday, May 6, 

2010. The purpose of this meeting is to 

provide a brief overview of recent 

Commission and regional activities, 

discuss civil rights issues in the state, 

hear from a subcommittee on the Utah 

Anti-Discrimination Division’s state 

audit report, and plan future activities 

and projects. 

This meeting is available to the public 

through the following toll-free call-in 

and conference ID numbers: 1–866– 

364–8798; conference ID 70344123. Any 

interested member of the public may 

call this number and listen to the 

meeting. Callers can expect to incur 

charges for calls they initiate over 

wireless lines, and the Commission will 

not refund any incurred charges. Callers 

will incur no charge for calls they 

initiate over land-line connections to 

the toll-free telephone number. Persons 

with hearing impairments may also 

follow the proceedings by first calling 

the Federal Relay Service at 1–800–977– 

8339 and providing the Service with the 

conference call number and conference 

ID. 

To ensure that the Commission 

secures an appropriate number of lines 

for the public, persons are asked to 

register by contacting Evelyn Bohor of 

the Rocky Mountain Regional Office and 

TTY/TDD (303) 866–1049 by noon on 

May 3, 2010. 

Members of the public are entitled to 

submit written comments. The 

comments must be received in the 

regional office by June 7, 2010. The 

address is: U.S. Commission on Civil 

Rights, Rocky Mountain Regional Office, 

1961 Stout Street, Suite 240, Denver, CO 

80294. Comments may be e-mailed to 

ebohor@usccr.gov. Records generated by 

this meeting may be inspected and 

reproduced at the Rocky Mountain 

Regional Office, as they become 

available, both before and after the 

meeting. Persons interested in the work 

of this advisory committee are advised 

to go to the Commission’s Web site, 

http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the 

Rocky Mountain Regional Office at the 

above e-mail or street address. 

The meeting will be conducted 

pursuant to the provisions of the rules 

and regulations of the Commission and 

FACA. 

Dated in Washington, DC, 19 April 2010. 

Peter Minarik, 

Acting Chief, Regional Programs 

Coordination Unit. 

[FR Doc. 2010–9383 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for clearance the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35). 

Agency: U.S. Census Bureau. 

Title: 2008 Panel of the Survey of 

Income & Program Participation, Wave 7 

Topical Modules. 

OMB Control Number: 0607–0944. 

Form Number(s): SIPP–28705(L) 

Director’s Letter; SIPP/CAPI Automated 

Instrument; SIPP28003 Reminder Card. 

Type of Request: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Burden Hours: 143,303. 

Number of Respondents: 94,500. 

Average Hours per Response: 30 

minutes. 

Needs and Uses: The U.S. Census 

Bureau requests authorization from the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) to conduct the Wave 7 interview 

for the 2008 Panel of the Survey of 

Income and Program Participation 

(SIPP). The core SIPP and reinterview 

instruments were cleared under 

Authorization No. 0607–0944. 

The SIPP represents a source of 

information for a wide variety of topics 

and allows information for separate 

topics to be integrated to form a single 

and unified database so that the 

interaction between tax, transfer, and 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES