alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 252/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.252.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 252 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5522 August 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.252.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 252

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5522 August 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 252/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6561 — Cytec Industries/Umeco) (1) | 1 |
| 2012/C 252/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 252/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6561 — Cytec Industries/Umeco) (1)

1

2012/C 252/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 252/03 | Euro exchange rates | 6 |
| 2012/C 252/04 | Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 27 Member States applicable as from 1 September 2012(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1)) | 7 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 252/03

Euro exchange rates

6

2012/C 252/04

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 27 Member States applicable as from 1 September 2012(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

7

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 252/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6670 — Bridgepoint/Orlando/Limoni) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2012/C 252/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6670 — Bridgepoint/Orlando/Limoni) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE


### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER

Appellate case name: Larry Wayne Richard v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number s : 01

- 1 4

- 00 07 2

- CR , 01

- 14

- 00073

- CR

Trial court case number s : 1 23 3 998 , 1401120

Trial court: 185 th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Larry Wayne Richard , has filed a pro se “ Request to Withdraw Appeal s ” in

his appeal s

. In his reques t

, appellant states that he does not wish to further prosecute his appeal and asks that his notice of appeal b e withdrawn

. By filing his request to withdraw his appeal s
, appellant effectively seek s to waive his right to appeal. Appellant has the right to waive his right to appeal. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. art. 1.14 (West 2005); Ex parte Broadway , 301 S.W.3d 694, 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). Any such waiver, however, must be made voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently. See id. ; Ex parte

Tabor , 565 S.W.2d 945, 946 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Appellant’s request s , however, do not provide any reason wh y he no longer wishes to prosecute the appeal s or any other basis to show that he is voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently seeking to waive his right to appeal.

Further, appellant is represented by counsel in th ese appeal s , and appellant’s counsel has not signed the request to withdraw the appeal s

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). Counsel should confer with appellant. If appellant no longer wishes to prosecute his appeal s , appellant’s counsel should file a motion that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) in each appeal

. Accordingly, we deny appellant’s pro se request to withdraw his appeal s

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: 

### /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court



### Date: July 1, 2014
#### § 125.115 Internal doors.

In any case where internal doors are equipped with louvres or other ventilating means, there must be a means convenient to the crew for closing the flow of air through the door when necessary.
EXHIBIT 28.2
                                               ------------

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT

To the Board of Directors
 United Companies Lending Corporation

We have examined management's assertion about United Companies
Lending Corporation's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
          -------------------------------------------------------
(USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 1997 included in
the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible
for United Companies Lending Corporation's compliance with
those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express 
an opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in
the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not
provide a legal determination on United Companies Lending
Corporation's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that United Companies
Lending Corporation complied with the aforementioned minimum
servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 1997
is fairly stated, in all material respects.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 4, 1998
                             PAGE 8
<PAGE>

                  UNITED COMPANIES LENDING CORPORATION
                             (LETTERHEAD)


As of and for the year ended December 31, 1997, United Companies
Lending Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of United Companies
Lending Group, Inc., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of United
Companies Financial Corporation, has complied in all material respects
with the minimum servicing standards set  forth  in  the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program 
                                 ----------------------------------
for Mortgage Bankers.  As of and for this same period, United
--------------------
Companies Financial Corporation had in effect fidelity bond and
errors and omissions policies in the amounts of $10,000,000 and
$4,000,000, respectively.



/s/ J. TERRELL BROWN                  3/4/98
------------------------------------  -------------
J. Terrell Brown                      Date
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



/s/ DALE QUICK                        3/4/98
------------------------------------  -------------
Dale Quick                            Date
Senior Vice President and
Servicing Manager

 

/s/ J. MILLER MURREY                  3/4/98
------------------------------------  -------------
J. Miller Murrey                      Date
Vice President and Controller


                              PAGE 9
0 2 4 8 12 16 20

Miles

Map 171

Roundup Harlowton

T7N

Pompeys Pillar

T Big Timber 1N Billings T2 Columbus S

Bridger

T8S

R18E R29E Montana

R104W R93W

T Wyoming 57N

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Map scale 1:900,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in May 2015

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Legend

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat

Management Areas and 

General Habitat Managment 

Areas - Fluid Mineral

(Oil and Gas) Allocations

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Oil and Gas Closed

Oil and Gas Open Major Stips

Oil and Gas Open Moderate Stips

Oil and Gas Open Standard Stips

^ Towns

Public Lands Survey System

Sage Grouse General Habitat

Sage Grouse Priority Habitat
§ 125.175 Protection of other airplane components against fire. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, all airplane surfaces aft of the nacelles in the area of one nacelle diameter on both sides of the nacelle centerline must be made of material that is at least fire resistant.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to tail surfaces lying behind nacelles unless the dimensional configuration of the airplane is such that the tail surfaces could be affected readily by heat, flames, or sparks emanating from a designated fire zone or from the engine from a designated fire zone or from the engine compartment of any nacelle.
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2012-1093

Docket Number

2011-SW-020-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Brantly International, Inc., Service Bulletin No. 111, dated February 10, 2011.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
§ 1209.405 Supporting services. ( a ) The staff of the Board is established to assist the Board in discharging its functions and responsibilities. The staff will: ( 1 ) Prepare analyses of petitions for waiver of rights to inventions for the consideration of the Board;
( 2 ) Prepare evaluation of proposed awards;
( 3 ) Document Board actions; and
( 4 ) Perform such other functions as may be required.
( b ) A full-time director of the staff will serve as a nonvoting member of the Board, and will direct the activities of the staff of the Board.
( c ) The director of the staff of the Board will report to the Chairperson of the Board.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T T I T O L E D E S M A A R A N E T A ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70124 A ge nc yN os . A 072- 544- 549

A 072- 544- 550 A 072- 544- 652 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r d o f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M a y15, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , G R A B E R , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T i t o L ed esm a A ran et a an d h i s fam i l y, n at i v es an dci t i zen s o f th e P h i l i p p i n es, pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rdi s m i s s i ng the i rappe a l f

r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng the i rappl i c a t i on f or pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED MA Y24 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70124 2 unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo l e ga l de t e rm i na t i ons a nd f or s u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e f

a c tu a l f in d in g s . W

akkaryv. H

older , 558 F . 3d 1049, 1056 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 9 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. S u b st an t i al ev i d en ce su p p o rt s th e B IA ’ s d en i al o f C A T rel i ef b ecau se pet i t i on er s di d n otes t abl i sh thatthe three i nci dent s of harm they e xp er i ence d c o n s titu te d to rtu r e , se e G u iv . I NS , 280 F . 3d 1217, 1230 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ( h a r a s s m e n t, in te rr o g a tio n , th r e a ts , a n dtw o h it- a n d - ru n in c id e n ts d idn o t a m o u n t to t ortur e ) , a nd the ydi d note s t abl i s h tha ti ti s m or e l i ke l ytha n notthe yw oul d be t ortur e d a tthe i ns t i ga t i on of orw i th the a c qui e s c e nc e of the P hi l i ppi ne g o v e rn m e n t, se e Si laya v. Mukasey , 5 2 4 F .3 d1 0 6 6 , 1 0 7 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . W e re j ec tpet i t i on er s’ cont ent i on thatthe B IA di d n otconsi der e vi dence of country c o n d itio n s a s th e yh a v e n o t o v e r c o m e th e p r e s u m p tio n th a t th e B I A c o n s id e r e dth is e v id e n c e . See Ferna ndezv. G on zales , 4 3 9 F .3 d5 9 2 , 6 0 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) . A cco rd i n g l y, p et i t i o n ers’ C A T cl ai m fai l s. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
1

Filed 3/3/14 P. v. Bates CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

KENNETH BATES,

Defendant and Appellant.

C073691

(Super. Ct. No. 12F07077)

Early in the morning of October 16, 2012, Sacramento County Sheriff’s deputies 

responded to an incomplete 911 call that a woman’s car had been vandalized. The car 

looked like it had been in a collision and was near a damaged telephone pole. It was 

registered to defendant Kenneth Bates and his wife. The California Highway Patrol 

(CHP) was dispatched, and the deputies handed the investigation over to the CHP officers 

when they arrived.

A CHP officer contacted defendant, who was walking away from the car and 

toward the officer. Defendant walked unevenly and swayed when he stopped. He could 

not stand upright and his breath smelled strongly of alcohol. 

Defendant told the officer he had been driving the car. He drank a 40-ounce beer 

that night and hit a telephone pole with his car. He told the officer he had been drinking 
2

too much and should not be driving. The officer arrested defendant after he failed several 

field sobriety tests and refused to take any more. 

Defendant’s blood-alcohol level was .24 percent. 

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of 

alcohol with three prior driving under the influence convictions within 10 years and 

driving with a blood-alcohol level of .08 percent with three prior convictions for driving 

under the influence within the last 10 years. The trial court placed defendant on five 

years’ formal probation subject to various conditions including one year in county jail 

with 153 days’ credit. 

Defendant appeals.

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening 

brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and 

determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 

Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief 

within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and 

we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of 

the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more 

favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

 ROBIE , J.

We concur:

 RAYE , P. J.

 MAURO , J.
Opinion issued January 28, 2014 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 3
- 00966
- CV

——————————— IN RE DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRI LLING, INC. AND DIAM OND OFFSHORE DRILLING LT D. , Relator s

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamu s

MEMORANDUM OPINION This proceeding arises from a personal injury sustained by Bruce Masson, the real party in interest, alleged to have occurred during his employment on a drilling rig temporarily docked at a Malaysian port. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and Diamond Offshore Drilling, Ltd., the relators, seek mandamus relief from2 the trial court’s interlocutory order denying their motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens. 1
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. All pending motions are denied
as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.

1 The Honorable Elizabeth Ray , Judge of the 165 th District Court of Harris County is the respondent. The underlying case is Bruce Masson v. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and Diamond Offshore Drilling, Ltd. , No. 2012

- 21768, in the 165 th District Court, Harris County, Texas.
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
Cardinal Financial Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 333-157183 on Form S-3 and the registration statements
(Nos. 333-106694, 333-111672, 333-111673, 333-127395, 333-134923 and 333-134934) on Form S-8 of
Cardinal Financial Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated March 13, 2009, with respect to the consolidated statements of condition of Cardinal Financial Corporation and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which appear in the December 31,
2008, annual report on Form 10-K of Cardinal Financial Corporation and subsidiaries.

KPMG LLP

McLean,
Virginia
March 13, 2009

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Independent Auditors’ Consent

 

The Board of Directors 

Corvis Corporation:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement(No. 333-XXXXX) on Form S-8 of Corvis Corporation of our reports dated February 12, 2004, except as to Note 19(a) which is as of February 19, 2004 and Note 19(b) which is as of March 8, 2004 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CorvisCorporation as of December 28, 2002 and December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows the years ended December 29, 2001, December 28, 2002 and December 31, 2003, and therelated financial statement schedule, which reports appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of Corvis Corporation. 

 

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, as of December 30, 2001, Corvis Corporation changed its method of accounting for goodwill and otherintangible assets to adopt the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

McLean, Virginia 

March 15, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 24906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10656]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

36 CFR Parts 212, 261, and 295

RIN 0596--AB67


Administration of the Forest Development Transportation System; 
Prohibitions; Use of Motor Vehicles Off Forest Service Roads

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 3, 2000, in Part III, of the Federal Register, the 
Forest Service published a proposed rule revising regulations 
concerning the development, use, maintenance, and management of the 
national forest transportation system (65 FR 11680). A number of 
organizations have requested an extension of the public comment period. 
In considering these requests, the agency has determined that the 
public initially had difficulty obtaining a copy of the proposed rule 
and accompanying documents. Additionally, the agency has concluded that 
a limited extension will not impede adoption of the final rule. 
Therefore, the agency is extending the comment period for 15 calendar 
days. Because the proposed rule was accompanied by a related proposed 
administrative policy, the agency, by separate notice in today's 
Federal Register, also is extending the comment period on the proposed 
policy for 15 calendar days.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing by May 17, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to USDA, CAET, Attention: Roads, P. O. 
Box 221090, Salt Lake City, UT 84122.
    Send comments electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c1b3aea0a5b2eeb6ae9ea2a0a4b5ecb2ada281a7b2efa7a4a5efb4b2">roads/<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ee9f1c1fdfffbeab3edf2fddef8edb0f8fbfab0ebed">[email protected]</span></a>.
    All comments received, including names and addresses when provided, 
are placed in the record and are available for public inspection and 
copying at Forest Service, 201 14th Street SW, Washington, D.C. 20250. 
Persons wishing to inspect the comments are encouraged to call 202-205-
1400 to facilitate building entrance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heidi Valetkevitch, Office of 
Communication, 202-205-0914.

    Dated: April 24, 2000.
James R. Furnish,
Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 00-10656 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>