alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1****AUDITORS’ CONSENT**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(File Nos. 33-81614, 333-105820, 333-105821, 333-118958), the Registration Statements on Form S-3,as amended (File Nos. 333-33237, 333-89767, 333-82106, 333-102225, 333-118956, 333-126741) and theRegistration Statement on Form S-4, as amended (File No. 333-118957) of Golden Star Resources Ltd.of our report dated March 27, 2006 (except note 28 which is as of February 26, 2007) relating tothe consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.   /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS  Vancouver, BC, Canada  March 13, 2007
# Official Journal C 32/30 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 32 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5830 January 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 32

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5830 January 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 032/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 December 2014 to 31 December 2014(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2015/C 032/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 December 2014 to 31 December 2014(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 9 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 032/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 December 2014 to 31 December 2014(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2015/C 032/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 December 2014 to 31 December 2014(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

9

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection  with the  accompanying  Annual Report of TechLite,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-KSB  for the year  ended  December  31,  2004 (the
"Report"),  I, J.D.  Arvidson,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  ss.78m or ss.78o(d));
and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  May 23, 2005
                                                          /s/ J.D. Arvidson
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         J.D. Arvidson
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


         The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
J-A21030-14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court 

HELEN ESBENSHADE, ESQUIRE 

ADMINISTRATRIX AND PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF 

ADYLBEK MURATALIEV, DECEASED

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellant

v.

ALPHA CONTRACTING III, LLC, KG 

CONSTRUCTION, ALLEGHENY POWER, 

ALLEGHENY ENERGY, WEST PENN 

POWER COMPANY, FIRST ENERGY 

CORPORATION, TRANZSPORTER, TIE 

DOWN ENGINEERING, INC., FAITH 

ALLIANCE CHURCH, AND THE WESTERN 

PENNSYLVANIA DISTRICT OF THE 

CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE

No. 447 EDA 2014

Appeal from the Order Dated January 27, 2014

In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

Civil Division at No(s): September Term, 2013 No. 1552

BEFORE: BOWES, J., OTT, J., and STRASSBURGER, J.*

CONCURRING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J.:FILED DECEMBER 02, 2014

I join Judge Bowes’ Concurring Memorandum.

I write separately to note that this case, along with those of Toktobaev 

and Dzhumaliev, cries out for coordination.
&hry,4
j4 Independent Newspapers, Inc. PO. Box 7001 ‘Dover, Delaware’ 19903’ I-$00-2$28586 State of Delaware: :ss. Counties of Kern: Before me,a Notary Public, for the County and State aforesaid, Wancla Ford-Waring, known to inctobe such, who being sworn according
tolaw deposes and saysthat she i anofficer of Independent Newspaper Inn, the Publisher of the The Delaware State News,

adaiv newspaper pub1isbe
at Dover, County of Kent, and State of Delaware, and that the. notiCe,

a copyof vbic. is hereto attnched, as )UbiiSIied in the The Delaware State News in its issue of )o f.. 7 ?ice Piuside1 Coror 3 t Independent Newspap )ot Sworn to urd suhscrecI before raethis ____________________________ Day oLUikij

AD.___
§ 308.161 Scope. The rules and procedures set forth in this subpart shall apply to the following: ( a ) Proceedings to suspend an institution-affiliated party of an insured State nonmember bank, or an insured State savings association, or to prohibit such party from further participation in the conduct of the affairs of any depository institution, if continued service or participation by such party posed, poses, or may pose a threat to the interests of the depositors of, or threatened, threatens, or may threaten to impair public confidence in, any relevant depository institution (as defined at section 1818(g)(1)(E) of Title 12), where the individual is the subject of any state or federal information, indictment, or complaint, involving the commission of, or participation in: ( 1 ) A crime involving dishonesty or breach of trust punishable by imprisonment exceeding one year under state or federal law; or
( 2 ) A criminal violation of section 1956, 1957, or 1960 of title 18 or section 5322 or 5324 of title 31.
( b ) Proceedings to remove from office or to prohibit an institution-affiliated party from further participation in the conduct of the affairs of any depository institution without the consent of the Board of Directors or its designee where: ( 1 ) A judgment of conviction or an agreement to enter a pre-trial diversion or other similar program has been entered against such party in connection with a crime described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section that is not subject to further appellate review, if continued service or participation by such party posed, poses, or may pose a threat to the interests of the depositors of, or threatened, threatens, or may threaten to impair public confidence in, any relevant depository institution (as defined at section 1818(g)(1)(E) of title 12); or
( 2 ) A judgment of conviction or an agreement to enter a pre-trial diversion or other similar program has been entered against such party in connection with a crime described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
[72 FR 67235, Nov. 28, 2007, as amended at 80 FR 5013, Jan. 30, 2015]
#### § 1240.101 Scope.

This subpart applies to awards for any scientific or technical contribution, whether or not patentable, which is determined by the Administrator after referral to the Inventions and Contributions Board to have significant value in the conduct of aeronautical and space activities, upon submission of an application for award to NASA, or upon the Administrator's own initiative, under 51 U.S.C. 20136.

[77 FR 27366, May 10, 2012]
EXHIBIT A

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23978-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:12:50 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23978-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:12:50 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23978-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:12:50 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 3 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23978-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:12:50 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 4 of 4
# L_2008324EN.01S00301.xml

| 3.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 324/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 324/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided to no longer quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
#### § 792.09 What if my request does not meet the requirements of this subpart?

NCUA need not accept or process your request if it does not comply with the requirements of this subpart. NCUA may return such a request to you with an explanation of the deficiency. You may then submit a corrected request, which will be treated as a new request.
§ 345.15 Impact and responsiveness review of community development loans, community development investments, and community development services. ( a ) *Impact and responsiveness review, in general.* Under the Community Development Financing Test in § 345.24, the Community Development Services Test in § 345.25, and the Community Development Financing Test for Limited Purpose Banks in § 345.26, the FDIC evaluates the extent to which a bank's community development loans, community development investments, and community development services are impactful and responsive in meeting community development needs in each facility-based assessment area and, as applicable, each State, multistate MSA, and the nationwide area. The FDIC evaluates the impact and responsiveness of a bank's community development loans, community development investments, or community development services based on paragraph (b) of this section, and may take into account performance context information pursuant to § 345.21(d).
( b ) *Impact and responsiveness review factors.* Factors considered in evaluating the impact and responsiveness of a bank's community development loans, community development investments, and community development services include, but are not limited to, whether the community development loan, community development investment, or community development service: ( 1 ) Benefits or serves one or more persistent poverty counties;
( 2 ) Benefits or serves one or more census tracts with a poverty rate of 40 percent or higher;
( 3 ) Benefits or serves one or more geographic areas with low levels of community development financing;
( 4 ) Supports an MDI, WDI, LICU, or CDFI, excluding certificates of deposit with a term of less than one year;
( 5 ) Benefits or serves low-income individuals, families, or households;
( 6 ) Supports small businesses or small farms with gross annual revenues of $250,000 or less;
( 7 ) Directly facilitates the acquisition, construction, development, preservation, or improvement of affordable housing in High Opportunity Areas;
( 8 ) Benefits or serves residents of Native Land Areas;
( 9 ) Is a grant or donation;
( 10 ) Is an investment in projects financed with LIHTCs or NMTCs;
( 11 ) Reflects bank leadership through multi-faceted or instrumental support; or
( 12 ) Is a new community development financing product or service that addresses community development needs for low- or moderate-income individuals, families, or households.
1

Gurdoglanyan, Nicole

From: Sean Maccoy [smm0284@yahoo.com]

Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 9:56 PM

To: GovernmentAffairs

Subject: Re: Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029

Dear Secretary LaHood:

 

I am writing today to express my strong support for JetBlue’s application to offer new beyond-perimeter service 

at Reagan National and link the nation’s capital to Austin, Texas!

JetBlue’s application will provide much-needed low-fare, high-quality service from the capital’s downtown 

airport to the capital of the largest of the contiguous 48 states. Austin is crying out for new JetBlue service to 

DCA, being two of the ten largest markets without nonstop air service to the airport. Their application will 

bring tremendous public benefit and much-needed low-fare competition to DCA. Please do not pick Southwest 

Airlines over JetBlue! 

Please join me in offering your support for JetBlue’s application.

 

Sean Macoy 

Austin, TX
Exhibit 32 (ii)





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, I, David K. Skeens, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





(1)  such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.








/s/ DAVID K. SKEENSDavid K. Skeens

Treasurer and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

November 3, 2010
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-70050, 33-80985,333-32237 and 333-57754 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos.33-81792 and 333-117883 on Form S-3 of Aldila, Inc. of our report datedFebruary 12, 2003, relating to the financial statements and financial statementschedule of Aldila, Inc., and our report dated January 24, 2003, relating tothe financial statements of Carbon Fiber Technology, LLC (included in Exhibit99.1), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Aldila, Inc. for theyear ended December 31, 2003.

 
| /s/ DELOITTE &  TOUCHE, LLP |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|

 

San Diego, California

March 23, 2005

 

----
§ 1216.302 Responsibilities. ( a ) The NASA Senior Agency Official (SAO), is the Associate Administrator, Mission Support Directorate. The SAO is responsible for overall Agency NEPA compliance, including integration of NEPA into the Agency's planning and decision making and resolving implementation issues. ( 1 ) The NASA Senior Environmental Official (SEO) is the Assistant Administrator, Office of Strategic Infrastructure. The SEO, in consultation with the SAO, is responsible for development and implementation of NASA NEPA policy requirements and guidance which fully integrate NEPA compliance into Agency planning and decision-making processes. To the extent the CEQ's implementing regulations at 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508 reserve a specific authority to the SAO, the SAO is the responsible NASA official for resolving matters related to that specific authority.
( 2 ) The NASA Headquarters/Environmental Management Division (HQ/EMD), in consultation with the SEO, is responsible for implementing NEPA functions and guiding NASA's integration of NEPA into the Agency's planning and decision making. HQ/EMD provides oversight of all NASA entities in implementing their assigned responsibilities under NEPA. HQ/EMD, in coordination with the Center Environmental Management Office, is responsible for determining the appropriate level of NEPA documentation and maintaining a publicly accessible internet portal which includes information on the status of environmental impact statements (EISs) and other elements of NASA's NEPA program (*https://www.nasa.gov/emd/nepa*).
( 3 ) Each NASA Center has an environmental management office that directs and implements the NEPA process, such as evaluating proposed actions; developing, reviewing, and approving required documentation; and advising Center-level program and project managers.
( b ) The “Responsible Official” is the NASA official who will ensure that planning and decision-making for each proposed Agency action complies with the regulations in this subpart and with Agency NEPA policy and guidance provided by the SAO, SEO, HQ/EMD, and the Center's environmental management office as applicable.
( c ) NASA must comply with this subpart when considering issuance of a permit, lease, easement, or grant to a non-Federal party and may seek such non-Federal party's assistance in obtaining necessary information and completing the NEPA process.
[89 FR 25499, Apr. 11, 2024]
H. R. 3769

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 137 East

Young High Pike in Knoxville, Tennessee, as the ‘‘Ben Atchley Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

137 East Young High Pike in Knoxville, Tennessee, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Ben Atchley Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ben Atchley

Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 125.281 Pilot-in-command qualifications. No certificate holder may use any person, nor may any person serve, as pilot in command of an airplane unless that person— ( a ) Holds at least a commercial pilot certificate, an appropriate category, class, and type rating, and an instrument rating; and
( b ) Has had at least 1,200 hours of flight time as a pilot, including 500 hours of cross-country flight time, 100 hours of night flight time, including at least 10 night takeoffs and landings, and 75 hours of actual or simulated instrument flight time, at least 50 hours of which were actual flight.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-12073

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

XAVIER JERMAINE DAVIS, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 9:18-cr-80195-JIC-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 21-12073 Date Filed: 10/19/2021 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-12073

Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant 

to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. 

See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) 

(sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly 

and voluntarily); United States v. Boyd, 975 F.3d 1185, 1190, 1192 

(11th Cir. 2020) (sentence appeal waiver was knowing and voluntary where district court specifically questioned defendant about 

the waiver during the plea colloquy). 

USCA11 Case: 21-12073 Date Filed: 10/19/2021 Page: 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.29 Summary disposition. ( a ) *In general.* The ALJ will recommend that the NCUA Board issue a final order granting a motion for summary disposition if the undisputed pleaded facts, admissions, affidavits, stipulations, documentary evidence, matters as to which official notice may be taken, and any other evidentiary materials properly submitted in connection with a motion for summary disposition show: ( 1 ) There is no genuine issue as to any material fact; and
( 2 ) The moving party is entitled to a decision in its favor as a matter of law.
( b ) *Filing of motions and responses.* ( 1 ) Any party who believes there is no genuine issue of material fact to be determined and that the party is entitled to a decision as a matter of law may move at any time for summary disposition in its favor of all or any part of the proceeding. Any party, within 20 days after service of such a motion, or within such time period as allowed by the ALJ, may file a response to such motion.
( 2 ) A motion for summary disposition must be accompanied by a statement of the material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue. Such motion must be supported by documentary evidence, which may take the form of admissions in pleadings, stipulations, depositions, investigatory depositions, transcripts, affidavits, and any other evidentiary materials that the moving party contends supports the moving party's position. The motion must also be accompanied by a brief containing the points and authorities in support of the contention of the moving party. Any party opposing a motion for summary disposition must file a statement setting forth those material facts as to which the opposing party contends a genuine dispute exists. Such opposition must be supported by evidence of the same type as that submitted with the motion for summary disposition and a brief containing the points and authorities in support of the contention that summary disposition would be inappropriate.
( c ) *Hearing on motion.* At the written request of any party or on the ALJ's own motion, the ALJ may hear oral argument on the motion for summary disposition.
( d ) *Decision on motion.* Following receipt of a motion for summary disposition and all responses thereto, the ALJ will determine whether the moving party is entitled to summary disposition. If the ALJ determines that summary disposition is warranted, the ALJ will submit a recommended decision to that effect to the NCUA Board. If the ALJ finds that no party is entitled to summary disposition, the ALJ will make a ruling denying the motion.