alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 227A/16 S

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 227A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4816 September 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 227A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4816 September 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2005/C 227A/1 | Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Medicines Agency

2005/C 227A/1

Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London)

1

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2005/C 227A/2 | Corrigendum to the following notices of open competition:





  — | notice of open competition EPSO/AD/25/05: administrators (AD5) in the field of European public administration/human resources, |
| — | notice of open competition EPSO/AD/26/05: administrators (AD5) in the field of law, |
| — | notice of open competition EPSO/AD/27/05: administrators (AD5) in the field of audit, |
| — | notice of open competition EPSO/AD/28/05: administrators (AD5) in the field of financial resource management, |
| — | notice of open competition EPSO/AD/29/05: administrators (AD5) in the field of economics/statistics, |
| — | notice of open competition EPSO/AST/7/05: assistants (AST3) in the fields of financial management/accountancy and project/contract management |

Corrigenda

2005/C 227A/2

Corrigendum to the following notices of open competition:





  —

notice of open competition EPSO/AD/25/05: administrators (AD5) in the field of European public administration/human resources,

—

notice of open competition EPSO/AD/26/05: administrators (AD5) in the field of law,

—

notice of open competition EPSO/AD/27/05: administrators (AD5) in the field of audit,

—

notice of open competition EPSO/AD/28/05: administrators (AD5) in the field of financial resource management,

—

notice of open competition EPSO/AD/29/05: administrators (AD5) in the field of economics/statistics,

—

notice of open competition EPSO/AST/7/05: assistants (AST3) in the fields of financial management/accountancy and project/contract management

Official Journal of the European Union

3

2005/C 227A/3

Corrigendum to notice of open competition EPSO/AST/7/05 to constitute a reserve pool of assistants (AST3) in the fields of financial management/accounting and of project/contract management (Official Journal of the European Union C 178 A of 20 July 2005)

Official Journal of the European Union

4

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### Reg ul atory Evalu ation
Docket No. FA A- 

### Directo rate I dentifier: -AD ffyoumake changes to the values in the table bf!ioll' , .VO llllliiSt ensure the totals update au:ordingly. 

### f( they do not , click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell
. 

### Esti m a ted C ost s :

Action Costs per Product (e .g. , airc r aft, engine, (e.g., In spection, propeller, app liance ) replacement) Work-hours Labor P arts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost Do not include on - 

### (inc lude cost (labor + 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet
co ndition costs her e 

### access , testing, (@$85/h parts) Regis ter ed and c lo se- up) our) Products 

### Inspection 

### & 39.5 "'1 *\ 

### Lubr i cation $0 "-' 

### "'....,. "'\() 

### 142 7(: I [J J[ () llf) \ 

### n. on I) l( n .tYj 0 OL• (J !( 'l 

### ()J c (l( , I) ll {I JO 

### v 

## ou O:Jf 

## n'r l '- 

### o on ll•H 0 I)() 

### ·' u .ou 0/J( 

### n NI 

# .. 0 Oil llr)l IJ.UO ) OJ }() 1- () , () (

**~** () _() {) ') 0. 00 ' 0/lf ,, 0 1.1(1 \ {J i)(l ll/

1 t ,, (10 ' 0 (II,


# . ,, '!.O'J u 'lll .l, .C 

### o r•••



## .. •. .c l' W•



### ... c r IJI!l



## .. C1 0 IJU 

## " .! ('I 

### n 00

**~** t' \ ,l,.l U.t,.J 

### {: '

**~~ .!**  0 (l() 

### The known number of products in compliance: 

### 0 Total Costs of compliance for 

### U.S. fl eet: $476,765 Costs covere d under warranty (if 

### known) $


### On-Co nd ition Co sts:



# ~ Ac tion Work

-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g., I nspection , ( in c l ude access, (@$85/hour) testing , and closer eplace ment) up) ;.. 'II") 'j: fUll '!- (J,!J, 

### ;, T< ') .;, I' 'j; r, •' ! ;. 

## :; 1 I 

### Special consideration s for Eco nomic Analysis (Use thisfield to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. Thisfield can also be used to explain warranty costs):

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "s i g nificant regulatory



# action"? **~** YE S* 

# D NO 

### cgj *Expl a nation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant?

- YES* 

# D NO 

### cgj *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD h ave a significan t econom ic impact on a s ubstantial numb er of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. • YES 

# D NO 

### cgj Explanation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include spec ific r equire ments for aircraft operated in Ala ska where av iation might be the only mo de of transportation?



# ~ Y ES* 

# D NO 

### cgj *Explanation:
(logo)
HOMESIDE LENDING, INC


As of September  30, 1998 and for the period from February 11, 1998 to September
30, 1998, HomeSide Lending,  Inc. has complied in all material respects with the
minimum  servicing  standards set forth in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for
this same  period,  HomeSide  Lending,  Inc.  had in effect a fidelity  bond and
errors  and  omissions  policy in the  amount of $76  million  and $20  million,
respectively.

William Glasgow, Jr.
Executive Vice President


December 11, 1998
Date

Post Office Box 44090, Jacksonville, FL 32231-4090  904-281.3000
BLM 

Jarbidge Field Office, Twin Falls District 

Jarbidge 

Proposed Resource Management Plan 

and 

Final Environmental Impact Statement
 

Volume 3: 

Maps, Appendices, Glossary, 

Works Cited, & Index 

May 2014 
 

 

 

BLM/ID/PL-14/002+1610 

BLM Mission Statement 

It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the
 

health, diversity, and productivity of public lands for the use
 

and enjoyment of present and future generations.
# Official Journal C 248/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 248 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6116 July 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 248

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6116 July 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 248/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8850 — Kaiser+Kraft/Hoffmann/Simple System)
   (1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 248/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8850 — Kaiser+Kraft/Hoffmann/Simple System)
   (1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 248/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2018/C 248/03 | Special Report No 18/2018 — ‘Is the main objective of the preventive arm of the Stability and Growth Pact delivered?’ | 3 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2018/C 248/04 | Update of the list of residence permits referred to in Article 2(16) of Regulation (EC) No 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 248/02

Euro exchange rates

2

Court of Auditors

2018/C 248/03

Special Report No 18/2018 — ‘Is the main objective of the preventive arm of the Stability and Growth Pact delivered?’

3

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2018/C 248/04

Update of the list of residence permits referred to in Article 2(16) of Regulation (EC) No 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 248/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8976 — Hisense/Gorenje) — Candidate case for simplified procedure
   (1
  ) | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2018/C 248/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8976 — Hisense/Gorenje) — Candidate case for simplified procedure
   (1
  )

1

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Slip Op. 00-54 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

________________________________________________ : SKF USA INC. and SKF SVERIGE AB, : : Plaintiffs and : Defendant-Intervenors, : : v. : : Consol. Court No. UNITED STATES, : 97-01-00054-S2 : Defendant, : : : THE TORRINGTON COMPANY, : : Defendant-Intervenor : and Plaintiff. : ________________________________________________:

JUDGMENT This Court having received and reviewed the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (“Remand Results”), SKF USA Inc. v. United States , 24 CIT ___, Slip Op. 00- 2 (Jan. 5, 2000), and Commerce having complied with the Court’s remand, and no responses to the Remand Results having been submitted by the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on April 6, 2000, are affirmed in their entirety, and it is further ORDERED that since all other issues have been previously decided, this case is dismissed.

____________________________ NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS SENIOR JUDGE Dated: May 16, 2000 New York, New York
**Exhibit 32.2**
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**
     I, Juliet M. Reising, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofVerso Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that, to my knowledge:
1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedMarch 31, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.
Dated: May 10, 2004    /s/ Juliet M. Reising
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7718

EARL D. BURGESS,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:09-cv-00083-RAJ-JEB)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl D. Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Leah A. Darron, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Earl D. Burgess seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition, and 

denying his motions to alter or amend pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 59(e) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(b). The orders are not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Burgess has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

ffyoumake changes to the values in the table bf!ioll', .VOllllliiSt ensure the totals update au:ordingly. f( 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

replacement) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

Do not include on- (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet 

condition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection & 39.5 

"'1 *\ 

Lubrication $0 "-' "'....,. "'\() 142 7(: I 

[J J[ () llf) \ n.on 

I) l( n.tYj 0 OL• 

(J !( 'l ()J c (l(, 

I) ll {I JO v ou 

O:Jf n 'rl '- o on 

ll•H 0 I)() ·' u .ou 

0/J( nNI .. 0 Oil 

llr)l IJ.UO ) OJ}() 

1- (),()( ~ () _(){) ') 0.00 

' 0/lf ,, 0 1.1(1 \ {J i)(l 

ll/1t ,,(10 ' 0 (II, 

. ,, '!.O'J u 'lll 

.l, .C o r••• .. •. . c l' W• 

... c r IJI!l 

.. C1 0 IJU 

" .! ('I n 00 

~ t' \ ,l,.l U.t,.J 

{: ' ~~ .! 0 (l() 

The known number of products in compliance: 0 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $476,765 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and closereplacement) up) ;.. 'II") 'j: fUll 

'!- (J,!J, ;, T< ') 

.;, I' 'j; r, •' ! 

;. :; 1 I 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ~ 

YES* D NO cgj 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? -

YES* D NO cgj 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer . • 

YES D NO cgj 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES* D NO cgj 

*Explanation:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0168 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. JAMES R. LOWRANCE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 12 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 9 2021

02/09/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0168
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT 

BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al., 

Debtors1

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT 

BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of 

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY 

(“PREPA”) 

Debtor. 

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17-BK03283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17-BK4780-LTS 

 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW LEGAL REPRESENTATION 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

COMES NOW Defendant McKinsey & Company Puerto Rico Consulting, Inc. through the 

undersigned counsel, without submitting to this Court’s jurisdiction, and very respectfully states 

and prays as follows: 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the last four (4) 

digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(the “Commonwealth”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) 

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17- BK-3284-LTS) (Last Four 

Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy 

Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the 

Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17- BK-3566-LTS) (Last Four 

Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-

BK-4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority 

(“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK-5523-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case 

numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24686 Filed:06/28/23 Entered:06/28/23 16:26:50 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

1. As of today, June 28, 2023, I will no longer be an associate at Reichard & Escalera 

LLC, and thus will no longer be able to continue my representation of McKinsey. 

2. McKinsey is aware of and consents to my withdrawal as counsel. 

3. McKinsey will continue to be represented in this matter by its current counsel of 

record and attorneys who have entered appearances on behalf of McKinsey. 

WHEREFORE the undersigned respectfully requests from this Honorable Court 

leave to withdraw from her representation of McKinsey. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. 

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this June 28, 2023. 

REICHARD & ESCALERA 

MCS Plaza, Suite 1000 

255 Ave. Ponce de León 

Hato Rey, PR 00918 

P.O. Box 364148 

San Juan, PR 00936-4148 

Tel: (787) 777-8888/777-8812 

Fax: (787) 765-4225 

/S/JOSHUA RODRÍGUEZ-RIVERA 

U.S.D.C. No. 308601 

E-mail: jrodriguez@reichardescalera.com 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24686 Filed:06/28/23 Entered:06/28/23 16:26:50 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Gamma Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Cunningham,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/S/
      Peter CunninghamPeter
      CunninghamChief
      Executive OfficerJuly
      14, 2009
§ 121.365 Maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration organization. ( a ) Each certificate holder that performs any of its maintenance (other than required inspections), preventive maintenance, or alterations, and each person with whom it arranges for the performance of that work must have an organization adequate to perform the work.
( b ) Each certificate holder that performs any inspections required by its manual in accordance with § 121.369(b)(2) or (3) (in this subpart referred to as *required inspections*) and each person with whom it arranges for the performance of that work must have an organization adequate to perform that work.
( c ) Each person performing required inspections in addition to other maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alterations, shall organize the performance of those functions so as to separate the required inspection functions from the other maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration functions. The separation shall be below the level of administrative control at which overall responsibility for the required inspection functions and other maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration functions are exercised.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19210, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-3, 30 FR 3639, Mar. 19, 1965]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3232 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3232

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

                                 An Act

 
To reauthorize certain school lunch and child nutrition programs through 
                             March 31, 2004.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN MILITARY HOUSING ALLOWANCES.

    Section 9(b)(7) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1758(b)(7)) is amended by inserting ``and through March 31, 
2004'' after ``and 2003''.

SEC. 2. CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM.

    Section 17(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Richard B. Russell National School 
Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1766(a)(2)(B)(i)) is amended by striking 
``September 30, 2003'' and inserting ``March 31, 2004''.

SEC. 3. REIMBURSEMENT TO STATES UNDER COMMODITY DISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS.

    Section 15(e) of the Commodity Distribution Reform Act and WIC 
Amendments of 1987 (7 U.S.C. 612c note; Public Law 100-237) is amended 
by striking ``October 1, 2003'' and inserting ``April 1, 2004''.

SEC. 4. FUNDING MAINTENANCE OF COMMODITY DISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS.

    Section 14(a) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1762a(a)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 2003'' and 
inserting ``March 31, 2004''.

SEC. 5. SUMMER FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN.

    (1) Section 13(q) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1761(q)) is amended by striking ``the fiscal year 
beginning'' and all that follows through ``October 1, 2003'' and 
inserting ``the period beginning October 1, 1977, and ending March 31, 
2004''.
    (2) Section 18(f)(2) of the Richard B. Russell National School 
Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1769(f)(2)) is amended by striking ``of fiscal 
years 2001 through 2003'' and inserting ``beginning October 1, 2000, 
and ending March 31, 2004''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```