alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1245.109 Assignment of title to NASA. ( a ) The instrument of waiver set forth in § 1245.115(c) shall be voided by NASA with respect to the domestic title to any invention for which a patent application has not been filed within 1 year (or a reasonable time thereafter for good cause shown) from notification to NASA of election of title, as required by § 1245.104(c)(2), for an advanced waiver pursuant to § 1245.104, or within 1 year from the granting of a waiver for an individual invention granted pursuant to § 1245.105.
( b ) The instrument of waiver set forth in § 1245.115(c) shall be voided by NASA with respect to title in any foreign country for which waiver has been granted pursuant to § 1245.106, if a patent application has not been filed in that country (or in the European Patent Office or under the Patent Cooperation Treaty and that country designated) within either 10 months (or a reasonable time thereafter for good cause shown) from the date a corresponding U.S. patent application has been filed or 6 months (or a reasonable time thereafter for good cause shown) from the date a license is granted by the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks to file foreign patent applications where such filing has been prohibited by a Secrecy Order.
( c ) In any country in which the waiver recipient decides not to continue prosecution of any application, to pay maintenance fees on, or defend in reexamination or opposition proceedings on a patent on a waived invention, the waiver recipient shall notify the patent representative within sufficient time for NASA to continue prosecution, pay the maintenance fee or defend the reexamination or opposition, and upon written request, convey title to NASA and execute all papers necessary for NASA to proceed with the appropriate action.
#### § 121.261 Vent and drain lines.

All vent and drain lines and their fittings, that are located in a designated fire zone must, if they carry flammable fluids or gases, comply with § 121.259, if the Administrator finds that the rupture or breakage of any vent or drain line may result in a fire hazard.
Exhibit 32

                                Certification by
                       pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Lampoon, Inc and
Subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this
Certification is an exhibit (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company for the periods reflected therein.


Date:  December 27, 2006        /s/ Daniel S. Laikin
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Daniel S. Laikin, Chief Executive Officer


Date:  December 27, 2006        /s/ Bruce K. Long
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Bruce K. Long, President


Date:  December 27, 2006        /s/ Jeff Gonzalez
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Jeff Gonzalez, Interim Chief Financial Officer
                                and Principal Accounting Officer
| (1)  | The      report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                            |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      registrant. |

| May      1, 2009                                   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
|                                               |   |
| /s/Jeffrey      R. Immelt                          |   |
| Jeffrey      R. ImmeltChief      Executive Officer |   |
|                                     |   |
| /s/Keith      S. Sherin                            |   |
| Keith      S. SherinChief      Financial Officer   |   |

----
#### § 1253.410 Comparable facilities.

A recipient may provide separate toilet, locker room, and shower facilities on the basis of sex, but such facilities provided for students of one sex shall be comparable to such facilities provided for students of the other sex.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Aubrey L. Dunn, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer and George A.
Rosenbaum, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First
Federal Banc of the Southwest, Inc. (the "Company") each certify in their
capacity as officers of the Company that they have reviewed the annual report of
the Company on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal ended September 30, 2006 and that to
the best of their knowledge:

1.   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


December 26, 2006                          \s\ Aubrey L. Dunn, Jr.
-----------------------------              -------------------------------------
Date                                       Aubrey L. Dunn, Jr.
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


December 26, 2006                          \s\ George A. Rosenbaum, Jr.
-----------------------------              -------------------------------------
Date                                       George A. Rosenbaum, Jr.
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to First Federal Banc of the Southwest, Inc. and will be retained by
First Federal Banc of the Southwest, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7925
RICHARD LAMAR FENSTERMACHER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA95-1165-R) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Lamar Fenstermacher, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissingwithout prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. The district court's dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers' Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). A dismissal without prejudice could be final if "no amendment [to the petition] could cure defects in the plaintiff's case." Id. at 1067. In ascertaining whether a dismissalwithout prejudice is reviewable in this court, the court must determine "whether the [petitioner] could save his action by merely amending the [petition]." Id. at 1066-67. Because Appellant could have amended his petition to assert some claims, the dismissal order is not appealable. Accordingly, while we grant Appellant's motions to amend his informal brief, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LAUREN PURNELL,

Defendant BelowAppellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff BelowAppellee.

§

§

§ No. 281, 2016

§

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID 1508003767

§

§

Submitted: June 13, 2016

Decided: June 29, 2016

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND and SEITZ, Justices.

O R D E R

This 29th day of June 2016, it appears to the Court that:

(1) On May 31, 2016, the Court received the appellant Lauren Purnell’s

notice of appeal from a Superior Court order, dated April 29, 2016, dismissing her 

appeal from a Court of Common Pleas’ sentencing order. The Court of Common 

Pleas convicted Purnell of Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree and sentenced 

her to twelve months at Level I probation, plus a $150 fine of which $100 was 

suspended, leaving Purnell responsible only for a $50 fine. 

(2) The Clerk of this Court issued a notice under Supreme Court Rule 

29(b) directing Purnell to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for 
2

this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to consider a criminal appeal that fails to meet the 

thresholds set forth in Article IV, § 11(1)(b) of the Delaware Constitution. Purnell 

filed a response to the notice to show cause on June 13, 2016. She argues the 

merits of her appeal from the Court of Common Pleas proceeding but fails to 

address the jurisdictional defect. 

(3) After careful consideration, we conclude that Purnell’s appeal must be 

dismissed. Like the Superior Court,1this Court’s constitutional jurisdiction is 

limited to criminal appeals when the sentence is “imprisonment exceeding one 

month, or fine exceeding One Hundred Dollars.”2In Purnell’s case, the Court of 

Common Pleas’ sentence did not include any term of imprisonment. Purnell was 

sentenced only to one year at Level I probation and ordered to pay a $50 fine. This

sentence fails to meet the jurisdictional threshold.3 Therefore, the appeal must be 

dismissed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice 

 

1 Del. Const. art. IV, § 28.

2Del. Const. art. IV, § 11(1)(b).

3Marker v. State, 450 A.2d 397, 398 (Del. 1982).
§ 135.609 VFR ceiling and visibility requirements for Class G airspace. ( a ) Unless otherwise specified in the certificate holder's operations specifications, when conducting VFR helicopter air ambulance operations in Class G airspace, the weather minimums in the following table apply:
( b ) A certificate holder may designate local flying areas in a manner acceptable to the Administrator, that must— ( 1 ) Not exceed 50 nautical miles in any direction from each designated location;
( 2 ) Take into account obstacles and terrain features that are easily identifiable by the pilot in command and from which the pilot in command may visually determine a position; and
( 3 ) Take into account the operating environment and capabilities of the certificate holder's helicopters.
( c ) A pilot must demonstrate a level of familiarity with the local flying area by passing an examination given by the certificate holder within the 12 calendar months prior to using the local flying area.
[Doc. No. FAA-2010-0982, 79 FR 9975, Feb. 21, 2014; Amdt. 135-129A, 79 FR 41126, July 15, 2014]
#### § 1253.100 Purpose and effective date.

The purpose of these Title IX regulations is to effectuate Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (except sections 904 and 906 of those Amendments) (20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682, 1683, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688), which is designed to eliminate (with certain exceptions) discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, whether or not such program or activity is offered or sponsored by an educational institution as defined in these Title IX regulations. The effective date of these Title IX regulations shall be September 29, 2000.
SERVED: SEPTEMBER30, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF AIRAMBULANCE BYAIR TREK. INC. FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1003
ORDEROF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE In view ofthe impending prospective lapse inFY2014 appropriations funding government operations as ofSeptember 30,2013, the Departmenthas directed that all employees in the Ofllce ofHearings be furloughed in the event ofsuch a lapse. Accordingly, in the event of such a lapse, the Office ofHearings will close on Tuesday, October 1, 2013, for the duration of the shutdown. Any deadline. whether set by regulation or previous order, is suspended and extended for the duration ofthe shutdown. SO ORDERED.

Attachment

- Service List

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1 ONE COPY Gregory S. Winton, Esq., Respondent's Counsel The Aviation Law Finn One Research Court, Suite 350 Rockville, MD 20850 TEL: 301-294-8550 FAX:**301~294-2525** Stephen W. Brice Esq., Complainant's Counsel Eastern Region, AEA-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1AviationPlaza, Room 561 Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3268 FAX: 718-533-5699 The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder,

ChiefAdministrative Law.Judge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2142 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1003 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mall. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 IndependenceAvenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
#### § 121.269 Extinguishing agent container compartment temperature.

Precautions must be taken to insure that the extinguishing agent containers are installed in places where reasonable temperatures can be maintained for effective use of the extinguishing system.
BULLETIN 1028

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PLATE 71

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
225" 177°30' 17°35! 127-40!
T

215! °20' 177
177-18 ee EXPLANATION

3500

Qal | Qd

Surficial deposits
Alluvium, colluvium, landslide deposits, and beach
deposits, Qal; sand dunes, Qd

Recent

33
QUATERNARY

Rocks of Kiska Volcano
Lava flows and interbedded pyroclastic rocks forming
Kiska Volcano. The most recent lava flows, Qkr, are
mapped separately

UNCONFORMITY

Cs

Sturdevant Rock

Pleistocene

Kiska Harbor formation
Water-laid coarse- to fine-grained pumice and detritus
derived from volcanic rock, interbedded with breccia,
and flow rock. Abundance of flow rock increases
upward in the section and northward in the area.
One breccia layer, QTkb, and one lava flow, QTkf, are
mapped as members where correlation is possible

os

Vulcan} P¢int

Late Tertiary

UNCONFORMITY
Gabbro
Medium- to coarse-grained intrusive gabbro and related
rock types

Vega Bay formation
Marine deposits of volcanic breccia, tuff, and a few
pillow lava flows, all of basaltic composition, with a
few interbeds of conglomerate and sandstone of

L similar material

Dikes and intrusive rocks
Dikes and small intrusive bodies are related to both
the Kiska Harbor and Vega Bay formations. Rela-
tion not differentiated J

52°05"

52°05’

Middle Tertiary
as
TERTIARY

yn
Contact
Dashed where inferred

7

Fault or fracture, showing dip

Dashed where inferred from topography. Direction of
displacement shown where known. u, upthrown side,
bd, downthrown side

we

=
Strike and dip of beds

@
Horizontal beds

x51L10
Location from which analyzed specimen collected

52°00" 52°00"

Little Kiska
Head

pe Orient Point

51°55’

TRUE NORTH

MAGNETIC NOR

51°55’

‘APPROXIMATE. MEAN
DECLINATION, 1960

Cape
St Stephet

51°50! 51°50’

( \ I waVega |Point 1 { | |
17°15" 17720" 17°35 177°30" 17°35 177°40"
INTEROR—OEOLOGICAL SURVEY. WASHINGTON. © €. 10182
Geology by R. R. Coats, 1947; D. P. Cox,

Base modified by U. S. Geological Survey from maps by J.P. Dobell, R. Q. Lewis, W. H. Nelson,

a ce GEOLOGIC RECONNAISSANCE MAP OF KISKA ISLAND, Wn fos ng Se 8
ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA

SCALE 1:63360
1 % 0 1 2 3 MILES

CONTOUR INTERVAL 100 FEET
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
DEPTH CONTOUR INTERVALS 100 AND 500 FEET
SUPPLEMENTAL DEPTH CONTOURS ARE DASHED
AND HAVE AN INTERVAL OF 25 FEET
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-00576- CV

Gle nn H egar, C om ptroller of P ubl ic Acc ounts of the State of T exas; and Ken P axton, Attor ney Ge neral of the State of Texas, App ellants

v.

Im perial F ire and Casualty In surance Com pany, Ap pellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 126 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 2-0 0280 8, H ONO RAB LE TIM SULAK , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

P ER CURIAM

Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to a bate this a

ppeal pending settlement
neg otiations. W e gra n t t h e motion and abate the appea l until April 3, 2015. I f the parties have

1
finalized a settlement by that date, they are instructed to file a motion to dismiss in acc ordanc e with
th e s e tt le me n t a g

r e e me n t. I f th e p a

r ti e s h a v e n o t f in a li ze d a s e tt le me n t b y th a t d a te , th e y a r e in s tr u c te d
to file a repor

t informing this Court of the status of the app ea l an d re q uesting any nece ssary extension of the abateme nt. All appellate de adlines will be tolled during the per iod of aba tement.

When this appea l was filed, Susan Combs was the Comptroller of Public Acc ounts of the 1 State of Texas and Gre g Abbott was the Attorney Gene ral of Texas. Glenn Heg ar and Ken Pax ton, as successors to these off ices, ha ve bee n automatically substitut ed as pa

rties to these proc eeding s. See Tex. R. App. P . 7.2(a)

.Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and F ield

Abated Filed: Mar ch 4, 2015

2
#### § 1261.508 Offset against a judgment.

Collection by offset against a judgment obtained by a debtor against the United States shall be accomplished in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3728.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09** 
**- 2297** 

GEORGE W. BLACKWELL, SR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
PAULA Y. SMITH, Dr.; PHILLIP STOVER, M.D.; BOYD BENNETT; THEODIS BECK; KENNETH TEAGUE; TONY SMITH , Defendan ts

- Appellees , and

SHANG

- HSIEN STANLEY YUAN; RICK ANDERSON; FMCU , Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Graham C. Mullen , Senior District Judge. ( 1:08

- cv
- 00526

- GCM )

Submitted : April 29 , 2010 Decided: May 3, 2010

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

George W. Blackwell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bullu ck Ricci, Assist ant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina , for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
George W. Blackwell, Sr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing his civil action

. **∗**

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal,
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court exte nds the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely
filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). We dismiss the

a ppeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was
not timely filed.

T he district court’s judgment was entered on the

docket on October 8, 2009. The notice of appeal was filed on
November 10, 2009. Because Blackwell failed to file a timely
notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the
appeal period, we dis miss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

**∗** Blackwell’s claims against Defendants Paula S mith, M.D., and Phillip Stover, M.D., were dismissed without prejudice. The remainder of Blackwell’s claims were dismissed with prejudice.
# Official Journal L 342/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 342 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5027 December 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 342

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5027 December 2007

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Council |
| | | 2007/854/EC |
| | * | Council Decision of 4 December 2007 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters on the provisional application of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau for the period 16 June 2007 to 15 June 2011 | 1 |
| Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters on the provisional application of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau for the period 16 June 2007 to 15 June 2011 | 3 |
| Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau for the period 16 June 2007 to 15 June 2011 | 5 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

DECISIONS

Council

2007/854/EC

*

Council Decision of 4 December 2007 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters on the provisional application of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau for the period 16 June 2007 to 15 June 2011

1

Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters on the provisional application of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau for the period 16 June 2007 to 15 June 2011

3

Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau for the period 16 June 2007 to 15 June 2011

5

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.