alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 120.111 Administrative and other matters. ( a ) *MRO record retention requirements.* ( 1 ) Records concerning drug tests confirmed positive by the laboratory shall be maintained by the MRO for 5 years. Such records include the MRO copies of the custody and control form, medical interviews, documentation of the basis for verifying as negative test results confirmed as positive by the laboratory, any other documentation concerning the MRO's verification process.
( 2 ) Should the employer change MRO's for any reason, the employer shall ensure that the former MRO forwards all records maintained pursuant to this rule to the new MRO within ten working days of receiving notice from the employer of the new MRO's name and address.
( 3 ) Any employer obtaining MRO services by contract, including a contract through a C/TPA, shall ensure that the contract includes a recordkeeping provision that is consistent with this paragraph, including requirements for transferring records to a new MRO.
( b ) *Access to records.* The employer and the MRO shall permit the Administrator or the Administrator's representative to examine records required to be kept under this subpart and 49 CFR part 40. The Administrator or the Administrator's representative may require that all records maintained by the service agent for the employer must be produced at the employer's place of business.
( c ) *Release of drug testing information.* An employer shall release information regarding an employee's drug testing results, evaluation, or rehabilitation to a third party in accordance with 49 CFR part 40. Except as required by law, this subpart, or 49 CFR part 40, no employer shall release employee information.
( d ) *Refusal to submit to testing.* Each employer must notify the FAA within 2 working days of any covered employee who holds a certificate issued under part 61, part 63, or part 65 of this chapter who has refused to submit to a drug test required under this subpart. Notification must be sent to: Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine, Drug Abatement Division (AAM-800), 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by fax to (202) 267-5200.
( e ) *Permanent disqualification from service.* ( 1 ) An employee who has verified positive drug test results on two drug tests required by this subpart of this chapter, and conducted after September 19, 1994, is permanently precluded from performing for an employer the safety-sensitive duties the employee performed prior to the second drug test.
( 2 ) An employee who has engaged in prohibited drug use during the performance of a safety-sensitive function after September 19, 1994 is permanently precluded from performing that safety-sensitive function for an employer.
( f ) *DOT management information system annual reports.* Copies of any annual reports submitted to the FAA under this subpart must be maintained by the employer for a minimum of 5 years.
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0937, 74 FR 22653, May 14, 2009, un, as amended by Docket DOT-OST-2021-0093, 88 FR 27636, May 2, 2023]
§ 119.43 Certificate holder's duty to maintain operations specifications. ( a ) Each certificate holder shall maintain a complete and separate set of its operations specifications at its principal base of operations.
( b ) Each certificate holder shall insert pertinent excerpts of its operations specifications, or references thereto, in its manual and shall— ( 1 ) Clearly identify each such excerpt as a part of its operations specifications; and
( 2 ) State that compliance with each operations specifications requirement is mandatory.
( c ) Each certificate holder shall keep each of its employees and other persons used in its operations informed of the provisions of its operations specifications that apply to that employee's or person's duties and responsibilities.
#### § 121.655 Applicability of reported weather minimums.

In conducting operations under §§ 121.649 through 121.653, the ceiling and visibility values in the main body of the latest weather report control for VFR and IFR takeoffs and landings and for instrument approach procedures on all runways of an airport. However, if the latest weather report, including an oral report from the control tower, contains a visibility value specified as runway visibility or runway visual range for a particular runway of an airport, that specified value controls for VFR and IFR landings and takeoffs and straight-in instrument approaches for that runway.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,461,835
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,703,488
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,393,905
<PP&E>                                       3,565,012
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,628,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,599,317
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,144
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,628,218
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,840,679
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,276,917
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                563,762
<INCOME-TAX>                                   225,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   338,762
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21


</TABLE>
#### § 1206.802 General Counsel.

The General Counsel is responsible for the interpretation of 5 U.S.C. 552 and of this part, as well as providing legal guidance with regard to disclosure of Agency records. The General Counsel is also responsible for the handling of appeals and litigation in connection with a request for an Agency record under this part.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

STEPHEN ALLEN and MEGAN E. ALLEN, Appellant s ,

v.
C ITIGROUP MORTGAGE LO AN TRUST INC., M ORTGAGE PASS

THROUGH CERTIFICATES, S ERIES 2007

- 10, U.S. BANK N ATIONAL A SSOCIATION, as Trustee , Appellee

.
No. 4D 17

- 1962 [September 28, 2017 ] Appeal of non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Eli Breger , Judge; L.T. Case No. 20

- 20 1 7

- C A

- 00 2979

- XXXXMB

- A W

. Peter J. Snyder of Peter J. Snyder, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.

Susan J. Silverman , Sarasota , and Gary I. Gassel of Law Office of Gary Gassel, P.A., Sarasota , for appellee

.
P ER C URIAM

. Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN , C ONNER and F ORST , JJ., concur

.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 125.407 Maintenance log: Airplanes. ( a ) Each person who takes corrective action or defers action concerning a reported or observed failure or malfunction of an airframe, aircraft engine, propeller, or appliance shall record the action taken in the airplane maintenance log in accordance with part 43 of this chapter.
( b ) Each certificate holder shall establish a procedure for keeping copies of the airplane maintenance log required by this section in the airplane for access by appropriate personnel and shall include that procedure in the manual required by § 125.249.
#### Lyman Hall and Wife, Appellants, v. P. L. Sutherland, Appellee.

Appealed from a decree of the Circuit Court for Clay County.

*542Appeal dismissed on motion of counsel for appellee December 10th, 1912.

H. L. Anderson,.for Appellants.

Toomer & Reynolds, for Appellee.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of Public Law 92-463, the “Federal Advisory Committee Act,” notice of a meeting of the Board of Visitors for Department of Defense Centers for Regional Security must be published.

The Board will meet in closed session at the Pentagon on April 26 from 0900 to 1330.

The purpose of the meeting is to allow the Board of Visitors to provide advice on the role the Centers for Regional Security play in the broader U.S. national security context. The Board will hold classified discussions on various national security policies to be handled by the regional centers as outlined in the Defense Planning Guidance and related to the Theater Engagement Plans of the Commanders-in-Chief of the Unified Commands. This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to the meeting because of a scheduling oversight.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law No. 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. App. II (1982)], it has been determined that this meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. § 552b(c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this meeting will be closed to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John Berry, (703) 695-6386.

Dated: April 18, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-10573 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000-10-M
§ 13.103 Order of investigation. The order of investigation— ( a ) Defines the scope of the investigation by describing the information sought in terms of its subject matter or its relevancy to specified FAA functions;
( b ) Sets forth the form of the investigation which may be either by individual deposition or investigative proceeding or both; and
( c ) Names the official who is authorized to conduct the investigation and serve as the presiding officer.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.
**Title:****The forum [electronicresource].
** 
SuDocNumber:EP 11.18:
ItemNumber:0431-Y-09 (online)
CGPSystem Number: 000605740
** 
2002 Issue1
2003 Issue 1 | 2003 December
2004 Issue 1
2005 Issue 1 | 2005 Issue 2 | 2005 Issue 3
2006 Issue 2
2012 Issue 1
 
March6, 2020******
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

MIN TANG,

Petitioner

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD, Respondent

______________________

2018

- 2188

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection

Board in No. DC

- 1221

- 17

- 0763

- W

- 1.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

G EORGE C HUZI

, Kalijarvi, Chuzi, Newman & Fitch, PC, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.

S TEPHEN F UNG

, Office of General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by K ATHERINE M ICHELLE S MITH

, T RISTAN L EAVITT

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, Chief Judge, M OORE and

H UGHES

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 13, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court
§ 121.106 ETOPS Alternate Airport: Rescue and fire fighting service. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the following rescue and fire fighting service (RFFS) must be available at each airport listed as an ETOPS Alternate Airport in a dispatch or flight release. ( 1 ) For ETOPS up to 180 minutes, each designated ETOPS Alternate Airport must have RFFS equivalent to that specified by ICAO as Category 4, or higher.
( 2 ) For ETOPS beyond 180 minutes, each designated ETOPS Alternate Airport must have RFFS equivalent to that specified by ICAO Category 4, or higher. In addition, the aircraft must remain within the ETOPS authorized diversion time from an Adequate Airport that has RFFS equivalent to that specified by ICAO Category 7, or higher.
( b ) If the equipment and personnel required in paragraph (a) of this section are not immediately available at an airport, the certificate holder may still list the airport on the dispatch or flight release if the airport's RFFS can be augmented to meet paragraph (a) of this section from local fire fighting assets. A 30-minute response time for augmentation is adequate if the local assets can be notified while the diverting airplane is en route. The augmenting equipment and personnel must be available on arrival of the diverting airplane and must remain as long as the diverting airplane needs RFFS.
[Doc. No. FAA-2002-6717, 72 FR 1879, Jan. 16, 2007]
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24302-11 Filed:05/24/23 Entered:05/24/23 13:30:00 Desc:

Appendix Exhibit 9 to Complaint Dkt 1-9 Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24302-11 Filed:05/24/23 Entered:05/24/23 13:30:00 Desc:

Appendix Exhibit 9 to Complaint Dkt 1-9 Page 2 of 2
#### LAMB V. LANKFORD.

(Decided November 20, 1913.)

Appeal from Chambers Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. S. L. Brewer.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on certificate.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 30, 2020

Order 

Clerk

July 30, 2020

161262(49)

JODY POHLMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 161262

v COA: 344121

Oakland CC: 2017-853588-DO

JAMES G. POHLMAN,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Family Law Council of the State 

Bar of Michigan to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted 

on July 16, 2020 is accepted for filing.
§ 121.627 Continuing flight in unsafe conditions. ( a ) No pilot in command may allow a flight to continue toward any airport to which it has been dispatched or released if, in the opinion of the pilot in command or dispatcher (domestic and flag operations only), the flight cannot be completed safely; unless, in the opinion of the pilot in command, there is no safer procedure. In that event, continuation toward that airport is an emergency situation as set forth in § 121.557.
( b ) If any instrument or item of equipment required under this chapter for the particular operation becomes inoperative en route, the pilot in command shall comply with the approved procedures for such an occurrence as specified in the certificate holder's manual.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 1922, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-222, 56 FR 12310, Mar. 22, 1991; Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2615, Jan. 26, 1996]
#### § 414.1 Collection of conference and other fees.

Ex-Im Bank may impose and collect reasonable fees to cover the costs of conferences and seminars sponsored by, and publications provided by Ex-Im Bank. Amounts received under the preceding sentence shall be credited to the fund which initially paid for such activities and shall be offset against the expenses of Ex-Im Bank for such activities.
LAW OFFICE OF JOHN MIETUS, LLC

6701 DEMOCRACY BOULEVARD, SUITE 300

BETHESDA, MD 20817-7500

JOHN R. MIETUS, JR. 

(202) 747-5212

(240) 396-5362 fax

john@mietuslaw.com

November 22, 2013

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL

Ms. Lauralyn Remo

Air Carrier Fitness Division

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Orange Air, Inc., Dockets OST-2011-0073/0074

Dear Ms. Remo:

Orange Air respectfully requests that the Department again waive condition 

9 of the certificate issued to it by Order 2011-11-31, condition 10 of the certificate

issued by Order 2012-1-31, and 14 C.F.R. 204.7 so as to extend, through February 

28, 2014, the time within which Orange Air must commence actual flight operations 

in order to maintain its interstate and foreign certificate authority. Pursuant to a 

waiver granted by letter dated July 31, 2013, these provisions currently require 

Orange Air to commence actual flight operations no later than November 31, 2013. 

However, due to further circumstances beyond Orange Air’s control, the Federal 

Aviation Administration and Orange Air will not be able to complete new entrant 

certification by that date.

The FAA and Orange Air are continuing to work towards the airline’s 

certification. Since the last waiver was granted, Orange Air has been preparing for 

the Aircraft Conformity Process -- unanticipated aircraft repairs were required --

and otherwise working with the FAA on manual preparation and other tasks 

associated with certification. The Federal government budget crisis and shutdown, 

and now the upcoming holiday season, have made it difficult for the FAA and 

Orange Air to coordinate final certification tasks, some of which require National 

Field Office personnel. Based on its meeting with the FAA this week, Orange Air

now expects aircraft conformity activities to begin December 9, 2013. If that holds 

true, the goal is to complete FAA certification during the third week of January, 

2014. (Jeff Hipps and Charley Beers remain the local FAA project and frontline
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 **Certification of the Chief Financial        Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, James R.        Gordon, the Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The South        Financial Group, Inc. (“TSFG”), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based        upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008        of TSFG (the “Report”):

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TSFG.

         

*/s/        James R. Gordon*

James R.        Gordon

Senior        Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The South        Financial Group, Inc.

November 6,        2008

 

A signed        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed        form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has        been provided to The South Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by The South        Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff        upon request.
WILLIE VINCENT TIMOTHY

THOMAS

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4893

Opinion filed November 20 , 2017.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

— Original Jurisdiction.

Rudolph C. “Rusty” Shepard Jr., Jean Marie Downing, and Chad R. Templeton, of

Shepard Law, Panama City , for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charlie Lee, Assistant Attorney General

, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and OSTERHAUS and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
§ 121.1111 Electrical wiring interconnection systems (EWIS) maintenance program. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section, this section applies to transport category, turbine-powered airplanes with a type certificate issued after January 1, 1958, that, as a result of original type certification or later increase in capacity, have— ( 1 ) A maximum type-certificated passenger capacity of 30 or more, or
( 2 ) A maximum payload capacity of 7500 pounds or more.
( b ) After March 10, 2011, no certificate holder may operate an airplane identified in paragraph (a) of this section unless the maintenance program for that airplane includes inspections and procedures for electrical wiring interconnection systems (EWIS).
( c ) The proposed EWIS maintenance program changes must be based on EWIS Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) that have been developed in accordance with the provisions of Appendix H of part 25 of this chapter applicable to each affected airplane (including those ICA developed for supplemental type certificates installed on each airplane) and that have been approved by the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office. ( 1 ) For airplanes subject to § 26.11 of this chapter, the EWIS ICA must comply with paragraphs H25.5(a)(1) and (b).
( 2 ) For airplanes subject to § 25.1729 of this chapter, the EWIS ICA must comply with paragraph H25.4 and all of paragraph H25.5.
( d ) After March 10, 2011, before returning an airplane to service after any alterations for which EWIS ICA are developed, the certificate holder must include in the airplane's maintenance program inspections and procedures for EWIS based on those ICA.
( e ) The EWIS maintenance program changes identified in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section and any later EWIS revisions must be submitted to the Principal Inspector for review and approval.
( f ) This section does not apply to the following airplane models: ( 1 ) Lockheed L-188
( 2 ) Bombardier CL-44
( 3 ) Mitsubishi YS-11
( 4 ) British Aerospace BAC 1-11
( 5 ) Concorde
( 6 ) deHavilland D.H. 106 Comet 4C
( 7 ) VFW-Vereinigte Flugtechnische Werk VFW-614
( 8 ) Illyushin Aviation IL 96T
( 9 ) Bristol Aircraft Britannia 305
( 10 ) Handley Page Herald Type 300
( 11 ) Avions Marcel Dassault—Breguet Aviation Mercure 100C
( 12 ) Airbus Caravelle
( 13 ) Lockheed L-300
[Amdt. 121-336, 72 FR 63411, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended by Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 121-380, 83 FR 9173, Mar. 5, 2018]