alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS

FOR THE
T HIRD D ISTRICT OF T EXAS
P.O. B OX 12547, A USTIN

, T EXAS 78711

- 2547

(512) 463

- 1733

Date: August 14, 2013

Case Numbers: 03

- 12

- 00274

- CR & 03

- 12

- 00275

- CR

Trial Court Nos.: D

- 1

- DC

- 12

- 904013 & D

- 1

- DC

- 12

- 904014

Style: Samuel Jones v. The State of Texas

The enclosed opinion and judgments were sent this date to the following persons:

Please note: In criminal cases, the attorney representing the defendant on appeal shall, within five days after the opinion is handed down, send his client a copy of the opinion and judgment, along with notification of the defendant’s right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review under Rule 68. This notification shall be sent certified mail, return receipt requested, to the defendant at his last known address. The attorney shall also send the court of appeals a letter certifying his compliance w ith this rule and attaching a copy of the return receipt within the time for filing a motion for rehearing. See Tex. R. App. P.

48.4.

The Honorable Clifford Brown Judge Travis County Courthouse

P.O. Box 1748 Austin, TX 78767

Ms. Elizabeth S. Phillips

A ssistant District Attorney Travis County, Texas

P. O. Box 1748 Austin, TX 78767

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

The Honorable Lisa C. McMinn State Prosecuting Attorney

P. O. Box 13046 Austin, TX 78711

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * The Honorable Billy Ray Stubblefield Administrative Judge Williamson County Courthouse 405 Martin Luther King, Box 2 Georgetown, TX 78626

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Ms. Linda Icenhauer

- Ramirez Attorney At Law

1103 Nueces Austin, TX 78701

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

The Honorable Amalia Rodriguez

- Mendoza

Criminal District Clerk Travis County Courthouse

P.O. Box 1748 Austin, TX 78767

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *
§ 1252.410 Exhaustion of administrative remedies. ( a ) A complainant may file a civil action following the exhaustion of administrative remedies under the Act. Administrative remedies are exhausted if: ( 1 ) 180 days have elapsed since the complainant filed the complaint and NASA has made no finding with regard to the complaint; or
( 2 ) NASA issues any findings in favor of the recipient.
( b ) If NASA fails to make a finding within 180 days or issues a finding in favor of the recipient, NASA will: ( 1 ) Promptly advise the complainant of this fact; and
( 2 ) Advise the complainant of his or her right to bring a civil action for injunctive relief; and
( 3 ) Inform the complainant: ( i ) That the complainant may bring a civil action only in a United States district court for the district in which the recipient is located or transacts business;
( ii ) That a complainant prevailing in a civil action has the right to be awarded the costs of the action, including reasonable attorney's fees, but that the complainant must demand these costs in the complaint.
( iii ) That before commencing the action the complainant shall give 30 days notice by registered mail to the Administrator, the Attorney General of the United States, and
( iv ) That the notice must state: the alleged violation of the act; the relief requested; the court in which the complainant is bringing the action; and, whether or not attorney's fees are demanded in the event the complainant prevails; and
( v ) That the complainant may not bring an action if the same alleged violation of the Act by the same recipient is the subject of a pending action in any court of the United States.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND FROM THE
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,054
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                       604
<INVENTORY>                                      4,150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,536
<PP&E>                                         215,972
<DEPRECIATION>                                 101,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,010
<BONDS>                                         50,460
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,542
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,204
<SALES>                                        185,069
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,672
<CGS>                                           53,099
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   452<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,770
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,770
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,770
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13
<FN>
<F1> THE PROVISION FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS AND NOTES IS PRESENTED
WITHIN OPERATING EXPENSES IN THE ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS INCLUDED IN TOTAL COSTS ABOVE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 11

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

#### § 11.53 What takes place at a public meeting?

A public meeting is a non-adversarial, fact-finding proceeding conducted by an FAA representative. Public meetings are announced in the Federal Register. We invite interested persons to attend and to present their views to the agency on specific issues. There are no formal pleadings and no adverse parties, and any regulation issued afterward is not necessarily based exclusively on the record of the meeting.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO, 

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al., 

Debtors.

PROMESA 

Title III 

No. 17-bk-3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

Re: ECF Doc. #21453 and #23689 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF INITIAL AND AMENDED FINAL FEE 

APPLICATION OF ANDREW WOLFE, MACROECONOMIC CONSULTANT TO THE 

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO 

Andrew Wolfe, Macroeconomic Consultant to the Financial Oversight and Management Board for 

Puerto Rico, hereby withdraws his initial (ECF Doc. #21453) and amended (ECF Doc. #23689) 

final fee application, without prejudice. 

Dated: June 15, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Andrew Wolfe 

Andrew Wolfe 

Macroeconomic Consultant to the Financial 

Oversight and Management Board for Puerto 

Rico 

Prepared by: 

 /s/ Jeffrey Chubak 

Jeffrey Chubak 

Amini LLC 

131 West 35th Street 

12th Floor 

New York, New York 10001 

(212) 490-4700 

jchubak@aminillc.com 

Attorneys for Andrew Wolfe 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24588 Filed:06/15/23 Entered:06/15/23 14:14:39 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
§ 1204.505 Delegation of authority to execute certificates of full faith and credit. ( a ) *Scope.* This section designates NASA officials authorized to certify NASA documents to be submitted in evidence in Federal Courts.
( b ) *Delegation of authority.* The following NASA Headquarters officials are delegated authority to execute certificates of full faith and credit certifying the signatures and authority of employees of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, whenever such certification is required to authenticate copies of official records for possible admission in evidence in judicial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1733 or any other statute: ( 1 ) General Counsel;
( 2 ) Deputy General Counsel;
( 3 ) [Reserved]
( 4 ) Assistant General Counsels.
[29 FR 6319, May 14, 1964, as amended at 39 FR 25229, July 9, 1974; 43 FR 34122, Aug. 3, 1978; 79 FR 11320, Feb. 28, 2014]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10458]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

April 20, 2000.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before May 30, 2000, 
to be assured of consideration.

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)

    OMB Number: 1505-0139.
    Form Number: TD F 90-22.44.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Request for Research.
    Description: This form allows the efficient intake of requests for 
investigative support sent to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network 
(``FinCEN'') by federal, state, and local law enforcement. It provides 
the information necessary to determine the lawful parameters of data 
base searches in response to the requests.
    Respondents: State, Local or Tribal Governments.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 7,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 30 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Other (once per request).
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 3,500 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Lois K. Holland, (202) 622-1563, Departmental 
Offices, Room 2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-10458 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-U
§ 1230.123 Early termination of research support: Evaluation of applications and proposals. ( a ) The department or agency head may require that Federal department or agency support for any project be terminated or suspended in the manner prescribed in applicable program requirements, when the department or agency head finds an institution has materially failed to comply with the terms of this policy.
( b ) In making decisions about supporting or approving applications or proposals covered by this policy the department or agency head may take into account, in addition to all other eligibility requirements and program criteria, factors such as whether the applicant has been subject to a termination or suspension under paragraph (a) of this section and whether the applicant or the person or persons who would direct or has/have directed the scientific and technical aspects of an activity has/have, in the judgment of the department or agency head, materially failed to discharge responsibility for the protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects (whether or not the research was subject to federal regulation).
**Exhibit 32.2****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**I, Juliet M. Reising, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Verso Technologies,Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30,2005 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and  2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: November 8, 2005       /s/ Juliet M. Reising         Juliet M. Reising,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 29, 1997, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                     0000797463
<NAME>                       GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1,000,000
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                                         2,921
<SECURITIES>                                                  59,775
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 99,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   2,624
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   0
<PP&E>                                                        25,278
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 6,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               224,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              0
<BONDS>                                                       44,788
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                       10
<COMMON>                                                           1
<OTHER-SE>                                                    14,138
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 224,966
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               9,544
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               3,524
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 312
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             1,783
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                1,081
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     327
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              754
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     754
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0.00
        


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 9, 2020

No. 04-18-00733-CR

Martin BALLEZA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR12645

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

The panel has considered Appellant’s motion for rehearing; the motion is DENIED. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 49.3.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24228 Filed:05/15/23 Entered:05/18/23 12:10:00 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2
                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, William S. Hummers III,  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of The South  Financial  Group,  Inc.  ("TSFG")  certify  that to the best of my
knowledge,  based  upon a review  of the  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2004 of TSFG (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TSFG.


/s/ William S. Hummers III
------------------------------------
William S. Hummers III
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
The South Financial Group, Inc.
August 6, 2004

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to The South  Financial  Group,  Inc.
and will be retained by The South  Financial  Group,  Inc. and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-6586-6] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10. 

# ACTION:

Notice; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of April 21, 2000, concerning a notice of a draft general NPDES permit. The document contained an incorrect number for the total allowable residues of offal to be discharged.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Florence Carroll, 206-553-1760. 

## Correction 

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         issue of April 21, 2000, in FR Doc. 00-10037, on page 21432, in the third column, correct the last sentence in the third paragraph of the                         **SUMMARY**                         section to read:                     

The total allowable residues of offal for permittees covered under the proposed permit must not exceed ten million pounds per year (based on deposition modeling using EPA's Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program). 

Dated: April 21, 2000. 

Randall F. Smith, 

Director, Office of Water. 

[FR Doc. 00-10646 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6213-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Blue Valley Ban Corp (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

March 30th, 2006


                                        /s/ Robert D. Regnier
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert D. Regnier,
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Mark A. Fortino
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Mark A. Fortino,
                                        Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-4465

In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena

_________________________

UNDER SEAL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNDER SEAL; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge;

Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-939-B)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Under Seal, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Corbin Byrd Woods, Sparks,

Maryland; Ira Lee Oring, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying his

motions to quash a grand jury subpoena to his former attorney, for

reconsideration of the denial, for a stay pending reconsideration,

and for a hearing. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In re:

Grand Jury Subpoena, No. CA-96-939-B (D. Md. May 9, 1996; June 4,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED