alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Euroopa Liidu C 432I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 432I |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 64. aastakäik26. oktoober 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 432I

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

64. aastakäik26. oktoober 2021

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Teated |
| | HALDUSMENETLUSED |
| | Euroopa Innovatsiooni- ja Tehnoloogiainstituut |
| 2021/C 432 I/01 | Euroopa Innovatsiooni- ja Tehnoloogiainstituudi (EIT) teadmus- ja innovatsioonikogukonna asutamise konkursikutse — Konkursikutse tunnus: HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

V   Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Euroopa Innovatsiooni- ja Tehnoloogiainstituut

2021/C 432 I/01

Euroopa Innovatsiooni- ja Tehnoloogiainstituudi (EIT) teadmus- ja innovatsioonikogukonna asutamise konkursikutse — Konkursikutse tunnus: HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

V Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Euroopa Innovatsiooni- ja Tehnoloogiainstituut

| 26.10.2021 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CI 432/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2021

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CI 432/1

---

Euroopa Innovatsiooni- ja Tehnoloogiainstituudi (EIT) teadmus- ja innovatsioonikogukonna asutamise konkursikutse

Konkursikutse tunnus: HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN

(2021/C 432 I/01)

Kooskõlas Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 20. mai 2021. aasta määrusega (EL) 2021/819 Euroopa Innovatsiooni- ja Tehnoloogiainstituudi (EIT) kohta kuulutatakse käesoleva teatisega välja konkurss instituudi uue teadmus- ja innovatsioonikogukonna asutamiseks. Konkursikutse raames oodatakse taotlusi.

Konkursikutse prioriteetsed valdkonnad: kultuuri- ja loomesektor ning -tööstus

Konkursi tähtpäev, tingimused, hindamiskriteeriumid ja taotluste esitamise juhised on teadmus- ja innovatsioonikogukondade lehel olevas konkursikutses instituudi veebilehel:

https://eit.europa.eu/our-activities/call-for-eit-communities/2021

---
#### WILSON *v.*THOMPSON.

Error — pleading—surplusage—substantial finding.

In a 9uit hy an assignee of a note, the plea was *attached*under the attachment law, as the credit of the payee of the note, the obligor summoned in as garnishee, and the money collected of him by execution — replication that the note was negotiated before the attachment, concluding with a verification, *and to the country*— rejoinder that the plaintiff received the note in fraud of the attaching creditor, concluding with a verification — no rebutter; on trial it was found that the defendant did assume, &c. and that the debt was not attached, on which judgment was given for the plaintiff — held on error that the replication denied the fact of the plea, and properly concluded to the country, the verification as well as the rejoinder are surplusage — held also that the finding was upon the substantial issue, was acquiesced in, and good after judgment.

Error to the Common Pleas. Thomson declared in the Common Pleas, on a note payable to one Strand or bearer, for fifty dollars, *333in two years, with interest, assigned to him. Wilson pleaded as to all but twenty-one dollars seventy-seven cents non assumpsit; and as to the other twenty-eight dollars twenty-three cents, that before the note was transferred to the plaintiff, that sum was *attached*as the credit of Strand, an absconding debtor, by writ from a justice, on which proceeding Wilson was summoned in as garnishee; and the money collected of him on execution. Replication that the twenty-eight dollars twenty-three cents was not attached before the note was negotiated, as to which he put himself *on the country,*and then concluded with a *verification.*Rejoinder, that the plaintiff took the note in *fraud*of the claim of the attaching creditor, and concludes with a verification. To which there is no rebutter. On trial, it was found that the defendant did assume, &c. as in the declaration, and that the twenty-eight dollars twenty-three cents was not attached, on which judgment was given for the plaintiff.

*Hophins,*for the plaintiff in error.

*Williams*and *Boalt,*contra.

Wood, J.

The replication denies the fact of the plea, and properly concludes to the country. The verification subjoined is surplus-age and a nullity, and so is the rejoinder. The finding, therefore, is upon the substantia] issue; it was acquiesced in at the time without objection, and we incline to hold it good enough after judgment. The judgment is affirmed with costs.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0872 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-SW-012-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
# Official Journal C 185/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 185 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5122 July 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 185

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5122 July 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2008/C 185/01 | Special report No 4/2008 concerning the implementation of milk quotas in the Member States which joined the European Union on 1 May 2004 together with the Commission's replies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Court of Auditors

2008/C 185/01

Special report No 4/2008 concerning the implementation of milk quotas in the Member States which joined the European Union on 1 May 2004 together with the Commission's replies

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### § 121.548 Aviation safety inspector's credentials: Admission to pilot's compartment.

Whenever, in performing the duties of conducting an inspection, an inspector of the Federal Aviation Administration presents form FAA 110A, “Aviation Safety Inspector's Credential,” to the pilot in command of an aircraft operated by a certificate holder, the inspector must be given free and uninterrupted access to the pilot's compartment of that aircraft.

[Doc. No. 28154, 61 FR 2613, Jan. 26, 1996]
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 4.3

                              AMENDMENT OF BY-LAWS
                              --------------------
           [as excerpted from the Board Consent of February 14, 2001]

         WHEREAS, the Board believes it to be in the best interests of the
         Corporation to amend Section 2.04 of Article II of the By-Laws in order
         to comply with the request to add a provision for the removal of
         directors with or without cause made by the California Department of
         Corporations regarding the Company's Filing by Coordination of the
         Registration Statement on Form S-8 which was previously filed with the
         Securities and Exchange Commission;

                  RESOLVED, that Section 2.04 of Article II of the By-Laws of
                  the Corporation is amended to read as follows:

                  "(a) The Board of Directors or the shareholders of the
                  corporation, by a majority vote, may declare vacant the office
                  of a director who has been declared incompetent by an order of
                  a court of competent jurisdiction or convicted of a felony.

                  (b) Any director may be removed from office with or
                  without cause."
(logo)

KNUTSON

        A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF TEMPLE-INLAND MORTGAGE CORPORATION

Report of Management

We, as members of  management  of  Temple-Inland  Financial  Services,  Inc. and
Subsidiaries  (including  Knutson  Mortgage  Corporation)  (the  "Company")  are
responsible for complying with the minimum  servicing rights as set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage  Bankers (the "USAP").  We are also  responsible for  establishing  and
maintaining effective internal control over compliance with these standards.  We
have  performed  an  evaluation  of the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum
servicing  standards  set forth in the USAP as of December  31, 1998 and for the
year then ended. Based on this evaluation,  we assert that during the year ended
December 31, 1998,  the Company  complied,  in all material  respects,  with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in the USAP.

As of December  31, 1998,  the Company had in effect a fidelity  bond and errors
and omissions policy in the amount of $27,000,000.

By:
         Senior Vice President
         Loan Administration
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24156-2 Filed:05/05/23 Entered:05/08/23 

Envelope Page 1 of 1
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ..
Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar
National Monument RMP / EIS

%
Z, - - _ a _ —_ _ —
( Z Sie g " =
| > /
| / Z c

\

|
J
—t\, ie -

: |
* Great Falls

|
J L

\ Billings Field Office Planning Area

Map 1
§ 1214.402 International Space Station crewmember responsibilities. ( a ) All NASA-provided International Space Station crewmembers are subject to specified standards of conduct, including those prescribed in the Code of Conduct for the International Space Station Crew, set forth as § 1214.403. NASA-provided International Space Station crew members may be subject to additional standards and requirements, as determined by NASA, which will be made available to those NASA-provided crewmembers, as appropriate. ( 1 ) NASA-provided International Space Station crewmembers who are not citizens of the United States will be required to enter into an agreement with NASA in which they agree to comply with specified standards of conduct, including those prescribed in the Code of Conduct for the International Space Station Crew (§ 1214.403). Any such agreement will be signed on behalf of NASA by the NASA General Counsel or designee.
( 2 ) NASA-provided International Space Station crewmembers who are citizens of the United States but are not employees of the U.S. Government will be required to enter into an agreement with NASA in which they agree to comply with specified standards of conduct, including those prescribed in the Code of Conduct for the International Space Station Crew (§ 1214.403). Any such agreement will be signed on behalf of NASA by the NASA General Counsel or designee.
( 3 ) NASA-provided International Space Station crewmembers who are employed by a branch, department, or agency of the U.S. Government may, as determined by the NASA General Counsel, be required to enter into an agreement with NASA to comply with specified standards of conduct, including those prescribed in the Code of Conduct for the International Space Station Crew (§ 1214.403). Any such agreement will be signed on behalf of NASA by the NASA General Counsel or designee.
( b ) All NASA-provided personnel on board the International Space Station are additionally subject to the authority of the International Space Station Commander and shall comply with Commander's orders and directions.
§ 1221.108 Establishment of the NASA Unified Visual Communications System. ( a ) The NASA Administrator directed the establishment of a NASA Unified Visual Communications System. The system, which is comprised of the NASA Graphics Standards Manual and any accompanying style guides or related NASA directive or specification, was developed under the Federal Design Improvement Program initiated by the President in May 1972. This system is the Agency-wide program by which NASA projects a contemporary, business-like, progressive, and forward-looking image through the use of effective design for improved communications. The system provides a professional and cohesive NASA identity by imparting continuity of graphics design in all layout, reproduction art, stationery, forms, publications, signs, films, video productions, vehicles, aircraft, and spacecraft markings and other items. It creates a unified image which is representative and symbolic of NASA's progressive attitudes and programs.
( b ) The Associate Administrator for Communications is responsible for the development and implementation of the NASA Graphics Standards Manual and any accompanying style guides for the Agency or related NASA directive or specification.
( c ) The Associate Administrator for Communications has designated staff to implement and monitor Agency-wide design improvements in consonance with the NASA Graphics Standards Manual. Designated staff will develop and issue changes and additions to the Manual as required and as new design standards and specifications are developed and approved. The NASA Graphics Standards Manual can be downloaded at *https://communications.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/NASA_Graphics_Standards_v3-TAGGED-v3.pdf*.
( d ) NASA Centers and Headquarters have designated staff to implement NASA's graphics standards and ensure compliance of the NASA Graphics Standards Manual and any accompanying Style Guides or related NASA directive or specification.
[85 FR 71830, Nov. 12, 2020]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11




                             BACK YARD BURGERS, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)

                     (In thousands except per share amounts)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           For the Year Ended

                                                January 3     December 28,       December 30,    
                                                 1998 (a)         1996                1995       
                                                ---------     ------------      -------------  
<S>                                             <C>           <C>               <C>            
Net Income (loss)                                $  162           $  357          $(2,953)       
                                                 ======           ======          =======        
Weighted average number of common                                                                
shares outstanding during the period              4,261            4,221            3,842        
                                                 ======           ======          =======        
Basic income (loss) per share                    $ 0.04           $ 0.08          $ (0.77)       
                                                 ======           ======          =======        
Basic weighted average number of                                                                 
common shares outstanding during                                                                 
the period                                        4,261            4,221            3,842        
                                                                                                 
Preferred shares convertible to                                                                  
common shares                                       298              322              691        
Stock Options                                        28               --               --        
                                                 ------           ------          -------        
                                                  4,587            4,543            4,533        
                                                 ======           ======          =======        
Diluted income (loss) per share                  $ 0.04           $ 0.08          $ (0.65)       
                                                 ======           ======          =======        

</TABLE>
                                                                                
--------------------

         (a) As a result of the Registrant's fiscal year ending on the Saturday
closest to December 31, fiscal 1997 contains 53 weeks versus 52 weeks for fiscal
1996 and 1995. As a result, sales for fiscal 1997 are not directly comparable to
those of fiscal 1996 and 1995.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OF MON TANA No. DA 22 - 0639 FORWARD MONTANA; LEO GALLAGHER; MONTANA ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS; GARY ZADICK, Plaintiffs and Appellants, V . STATE OF MONTANA, by and through GREG GIANFORTE, GOVERNOR, Defendant and Appellees. On Appeal from the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, Cause No. ADV
- 21 - 611 The Hon. Mike Menahan, Presiding **GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s mo tion fo r a 9 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefore , Appellee is granted an e xtension of

time to and including August 29 , 2023 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 2 2023

05/02/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0639
§ 1203.500 Use of derivative classification. ( a ) Persons who reproduce, extract, or summarize classified information, or who apply classification markings derived from source material or as directed by a classification guide, need not possess original classification authority.
( b ) Persons who apply derivative classification markings shall: ( 1 ) Be identified by name and position or by personal identifier, in a manner that is immediately apparent for each derivative classification action;
( 2 ) Observe and respect original classification decisions; and
( 3 ) Carry forward to any newly created documents the pertinent classification markings. For information derivatively classified based on multiple sources, the derivative classifier shall carry forward: ( i ) The date or event for declassification that corresponds to the longest period of classification among the sources or the marking established pursuant to section 1.6(a)(4)(D) of the Order; and
( ii ) A listing of the source materials.
( c ) Derivative classifiers shall, whenever practicable, use a classified addendum when classified information constitutes a small portion of an otherwise unclassified document or prepare a product to allow for dissemination at the lowest level of classification possible or in unclassified form.
( d ) Persons who apply derivative classification markings shall receive training in the proper application of the derivative classification principles of the Order, with an emphasis on avoiding over-classification, at least once every two years. Derivative classifiers who do not receive such training at least once every two years shall have their authority to apply derivative classification markings suspended until they have received such training. A waiver may be granted by the Administrator, the Deputy Administrator, or the Assistant Administrator for Protective Services if an individual is unable to receive such training due to unavoidable circumstances. Whenever a waiver is granted, the individual shall receive such training as soon as practicable.
[78 FR 5119, Jan. 24, 2013]
#### Myrna UNDERWOOD, Sheila Fazande, Annie Johnson, Jerome Smith, Cora Ewers, Frances Jardin, Lura R. Stentz, Charlotte West, Aritisha McGee, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Samuel R. PIERCE, Jr., Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 83-5773.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 15, 1986.

Mary S. Burdick, Western Center on Law and Poverty, Inc., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.

James R. Madison, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, San Francisco, Cal., for amicus curiae.

Sheila Lieber, Robert Greenspan, Merril Hirsh, Attys., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellant.

Before HUG and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and CARROLL*, District Judge.

*

The Honorable Earl H. Carroll, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

ORDER

The opinion appearing at 761 F.2d 1342 is amended as follows: Section VI, commencing on page 1347, is modified by retaining the first paragraph, eliminating the remainder of the section, and substituting the following:

> The Supreme Court recently has expressed caution as to the use of multipliers in calculating reasonable attorneys’ fees. *Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air,*— U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 3088, 3096-3100, 92 L.Ed.2d 439 (1986). We need not decide in this case whether the use of a multiplier is permissible under the statutory language of the EAJA or under the recent Supreme Court authority. We conclude that compensation for the special factors involved in this case was adequately provided for by the allowance of the hourly rates in excess of the $75.00 specified in the statute.