alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Porter, Appellant, *v.*Grisham.

An appeal *bond*as well as the *security*must be approved of by the court. Where the court only approved of the security and authorised the bond to be given any time within thirty days: *Held,*insufficient.

Causes can be brought into this court by appeal or writ of error, but to give jurisdiction to the court, the requisitions of the law in relation to obtaining such writ or appeal must be strictly complied with.

APPEAL from the decision of the probate court of Franklin county. *

Stewart, for the appellant.

Boyd, *contra.-*

Mr. Justice Pratt

delivered the - opinion of the court, which states sufficiently the only question arising in the cause.

This cause purported to come up on an appeal from the court of probate of Franklin county.

On examining the record we find the following’entry:

“ And, afterwards, to wit, at the same term of the court, the said respondent prayed an appeal from the opinion, and decision of the court to the High Court of Errors and Appeals of the state of Mississippi, which appeal was granted upon the respondent entering into bond conditioned as the law directs in the penal sum of two hundred dollars, within thirty days with Thomas Harris security, who is approved of by the court.”

In the Rev. Code, p. SO, sect. 12, are the following provisions in relation to appeals from the court of probate:

*“*Any person who may conceive himself or herself aggrieved by any judgment, decree, decision or order of the court of probate, shall have the liberty of appealing to the High Court of Errors and Appeals, upon the appellant giving bond with good and sufficient security approved of by the said court, and in such sum as they shall direct to the judge thereof.”

*76The question presented is whether this court can take jurisdiction of a cause under an appeal as taken in the present case?

To constitute an appeal, the appellant must give bond with good and-sufficient surety approved of by the court below. In the present case the court only approved of the surety and authorised the bond to be given any time within thirty days. This we deem insufficient. The bond as well as the surety must be approved by the court; for what advantage would the appellee derive from good surety if the bond were fatally defective?

Causes can be brought into this court by appeal or writ of error; but to give the court jurisdiction, the requisitions of the law, in relation to the obtaining such appeal or writ, must have been strictly complied with. ' ' '

The law not having been complied with in the present case, the cause must be stricken from the docket.
CERTIFICATIONS 

I, Anthony Jurak, certifythat: 

1.              I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Jurak Corporation World          Wide, Inc.; 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement          of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the          statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were          made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisannual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis annual report; 

4.     I amresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  

    a)                 designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material          information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,          is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the          period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

    b)                 evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and          procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual          report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

    c)                 presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the          disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation          Date;
5.     I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the           registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of           directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):  

    a)                 all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls          which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,          summarize and report financial data and have identified for the          registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

    b)                 any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees          who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; andDate: September 7, 2004 Signed: /s/ Anthony Jurak  Name: Anthony Jurak Title: Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

136 CA 11-00868 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ.

RAUL RIVERA, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (CLAIM NO. 110682.)

THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY, NEW YORK CITY (MILTON ZELERMYER OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANT-APPELLANT.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (OWEN DEMUTH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Renee Forgensi Minarik, J.), entered July 28, 2010. The order granted the motion of defendant for leave to amend its answer and for summary judgment and dismissed the claim.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying those parts of defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the claims for negligence and medical malpractice and reinstating those claims, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Claimant, an inmate at Auburn Correctional Facility, previously commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination of the Department of Correctional Services (DOCS) denying him medical treatment for hepatitis C based upon his refusal to participate in the residential substance abuse treatment (RSAT) program. Claimant also sought judgment directing DOCS to provide him with such medical treatment. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, concluding that, inter alia, the determination of DOCS requiring claimant to participate in RSAT as a condition to receiving medical treatment for hepatitis C was not arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion ( Matter of Rivera v Goord , 10 Misc 3d 302).

Claimant thereafter commenced the instant action seeking damages for injuries allegedly resulting from defendant’s denial of medical treatment for hepatitis C. The Court of Claims erred in granting those parts of defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the claims for negligence and medical malpractice on the ground that those claims are barred by the doctrine of res judicata or collateral estoppel. “In the prior CPLR article 78 proceeding[, claimant] could not have sought the relief [he] seek[s] in this action” ( Margerum v-2- 136 CA 11-00868

City of Buffalo , 63 AD3d 1574, 1580). Moreover, whether defendant was negligent or deviated from accepted standards of care “was not actually and necessarily decided” in that proceeding ( Reynolds v Krebs , 81 AD3d 1269, 1271). We therefore modify the order accordingly.

Entered: January 31, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32(b)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RMS TITANIC, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on October 13, 2004, (the "Report"), I, Gerald Couture,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Gerald Couture
-------------------------
Gerald  Couture
Chief Financial Officer
October 13, 2004
§ 623.2 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *FCA* means the Farm Credit Administration.
( b ) *Board* means the Farm Credit Administration Board.
( c ) *Act* means the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended. 12 U.S.C. 2001, *et seq.*
( d ) The terms *institution in the System, System institution* and *institution* mean all institutions enumerated in section 1.2 of the Act, any institution chartered pursuant to or established by the Act, except for the Farm Credit System Assistance Board and the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation and any service corporation chartered under the Act.
( e ) The term *presiding officer* includes the Board, one or more members thereof, FCA employees, or an administrative law judge. As used in this part, the term shall be construed to refer to whichever of the above-identified individuals presides at a hearing or other proceeding, except as otherwise specified in the text;
( f ) The term *attorney* means any person who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of any State, possession, territory, Commonwealth or the District of Columbia;
( g ) The term *practice* means transacting any business with the FCA, including but not limited to: ( 1 ) The representation of another person at any adjudicatory, investigatory, removal or rulemaking proceeding conducted before the FCA or a presiding officer;
( 2 ) The preparation or certification of any statement, opinion, report of financial condition and performance, financial statement, appraisal report, audit report, or other document or report by any attorney, accountant, appraiser or other person which is filed with or submitted to the FCA, with such person's consent or knowledge in connection with any filing with the FCA;
( 3 ) A presentation to the FCA or a presiding officer at a conference or meeting relating to an institution's or person's rights, privileges or liabilities under the laws administered by the FCA and rules and regulations promulgated thereunder;
( 4 ) Any business correspondence or communication with the FCA or a presiding officer; and
( 5 ) The transaction of any other business with the FCA on behalf of another, in the capacity of an attorney, accountant, appraiser, licensed expert or any other capacity.
[51 FR 21147, June 11, 1986, as amended at 53 FR 27285, July 19, 1988; 78 FR 31835, May 28, 2013]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK>  0000902056
<NAME> SAF T LOK INCORPORATED
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          34,607
<SECURITIES>                                   962,480
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,880
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    557,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,580,558
<PP&E>                                       1,465,376
<DEPRECIATION>                                 508,289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,807,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          316,554
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,089,270
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,807,584
<SALES>                                        140,991
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,994
<CGS>                                          145,931 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  608,782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,807
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,204,513)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,204,513)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,204,513)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)<F1>
<FN>
<F1> Restated to conform to SFAS No. 128. "EPS-PRIMARY" denotes Basic EPS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 261A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.261.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 261A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5328 September 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.261.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 261A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5328 September 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2010/C 261A/01 | Corrigendum to the notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/178-179/10 (OJ C 110 A, 29.4.2010) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Corrigenda

Corrigenda

2010/C 261A/01

Corrigendum to the notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/178-179/10 (OJ C 110 A, 29.4.2010)

(OJ C 110 A, 29.4.2010)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | (FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 9 | |
| 19 | (FR) |
| 23 | (DE/ES/PT) |
| 28 | |
| 48 | |
| 53 | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | |
| 60 | |
| 61 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 62 | |
| 64 | |
| 66 | (BG/RO) |
| 67 | (ES) |
| 70 | (PT) |
| 73 | (FI) |
| 74 | (SV) |
| 91 | |
| 95 | |
| 104 | |
| 110 | |
| 116 | (ET) |
| 119 | |
| 129 | (EL) |
| 137 | (LT/LV/MT) |
| 138 | (BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 143 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 144 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 146 | (DA/FI/MT) |
| 147 | (FI) |
| 149 | (IT) |
| 150 | (BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 151 | |
| 155 | |
| 156 | (PL) |
| 157 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 171 | (IT) |
| 178 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 184 | |
| 188 | (DA/DE/EN/FR/SL) |
| 190 | |
| 191 | |
| 192 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 196 | (BG/EN/NL/RO/SL) |
| 201 | |
| 204 | (EN/FR) |
| 219 | |
| 227 | (EN/FR) |
| 236 | |
| 238 | |
| 242 | (BG/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK/SL) |
| 248 | (DA/DE/EN/LT/NL/RO) |
| 249 | |
| 253 | |
| 254 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 256 | (RO) |
| 257 | (CS/PL) |
| 261 | |

5

(FR)

9

19

(FR)

23

(DE/ES/PT)

28

48

53

56

57

60

61

(DE/EN/FR)

62

64

66

(BG/RO)

67

(ES)

70

(PT)

73

(FI)

74

(SV)

91

95

104

110

116

(ET)

119

129

(EL)

137

(LT/LV/MT)

138

(BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK)

143

(DE/EN/FR)

144

(DE/EN/FR)

146

(DA/FI/MT)

147

(FI)

149

(IT)

150

(BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK)

151

155

156

(PL)

157

163

164

171

(IT)

178

(DE/EN/FR)

184

188

(DA/DE/EN/FR/SL)

190

191

192

(DE/EN/FR)

196

(BG/EN/NL/RO/SL)

201

204

(EN/FR)

219

227

(EN/FR)

236

238

242

(BG/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK/SL)

248

(DA/DE/EN/LT/NL/RO)

249

253

254

(DE/EN/FR)

256

(RO)

257

(CS/PL)

261

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL

a a

SURVEY BULLETIN 1030 PLATE 2

wf

1104 | flo"
1004 Bie +100"
Zz
sie ;
0 8i8 Loo:
a
oer Ig +80"
wel a
10-15 10-14
604 Loa Leo
50}
a
30} 30"
20-4 ‘Sand of late Miocene age 20"
104 plo
_ Mean ta esl 5
104 Ho"
20

753

p-l00° —— wo!

Piatocene deposits
x x wl : ;
5 =
5
t80 s al g =
iene : i ia
Lo 30-|
wos 8
}-60" }20’ 205
Recent stream Sand of ate Miocene age
‘sediments z s nt
+50 104 7 fio’ 104
Ee Le Fi

Lao" 0- Moon ova level O 0. r o

Loo’ ral Ho 104 bio

be 2 20! 20 Leo

10 30+ [30 305 +30"
Mean ee ° “0 « ww

EXPLANATION
: or ra
Be =| foe rere:
: : eet s) ne ees oo
Caleareous Fossiliferous (marine) clayey Fossilferous (marine) calcareous Fosiierous (marine) Fessiferous (marine) Limestone Phosphate No recovery
clayey Dhosphatie sand honphele clayey sand hosphatc sand ‘Caleareous sand

GEOLOGIC SECTIONS THROUGH PARTS OF HARDEE AND DE SOTO COUNTIES, FLORIDA

1 0 10 Miles
i. t n L -_ L . . L 1 By

378283 O ~56 (In pocket)
CASOS POLICIACOS

Asesinan a hombre de 26 años en 

Caguas

Fue baleado frente a su residencia | Falleció mientras 

recibía asistencia médica.

Por TELEMUNDO PR • Publicado el 30 de marzo del 2023 • Actualizado a las 6:48

am del 30 de marzo del 2023

Orlando Hernández

Policías investigan asesinato.

Un hombre fue asesinado a eso de las 9:15 pm del miércoles en la avenida 

Garrido, de la urbanización Villa Blanca, en Caguas.

Según el informe de la Policía, una llamada al 9-1-1 los alertó sobre una 

persona herida de bala frente a una residencia.

Al llegar los agentes, encontraron a Carlos Rafael Vázquez Pérez de 26 años, 

quien fue transportado al Hospital HIMA de Caguas, donde falleció mientras 

recibía asistencia médica.

La División de Homicidios del Cuerpo de Investigaciones Criminales (CIC) de 

Caguas y el fiscal Darío Vissepó se hicieron a cargo de la investigación.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-51 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 1
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24330-8 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 15:46:12 Desc:

Exhibit EXHIBIT 8 - MOTION Page 1 of 1
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-1 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY


Fire Defense Deployment Analysis Project

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/ United States Fire 
Administration (USFA).

ACTION: Notice of postponement of research project.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We (FEMA) give notice that we have postponed indefinitely our 
research project to update a methodology on ``Fire Defense Deployment 
Analysis''. On March 7, 2000 we gave notice in the Federal Register, 65 
FR 12007, of the availability of funds to update the 1968 analysis 
using a cooperative agreement. Because of this postponement we cannot 
honor requests for copies of the ``Assistance Application Package'' 
now. No further information is available at this time.

    Dated: April 11, 2000.
Kenneth Burris,
Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Fire Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-10143 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-01-P
#### Cox *v.*Wadlington *et al.*

*.*The writing of an acknowledgment of service of citation upon the hack of it, by the clerk of an inferior court, is a mode of service not known to the law, and therefore void.

MOTION to dismiss for want of service of citation.

Tupper and Rollins, for the motion.

Hughes, *contra.*

Per Curiam, Prat J.

This cause was submitted on a motion to dismiss for the' following reasons:

That no citation has been properly served upon the defendant in error.

The endorsement of service upon the citation in this case is in the following words:

“ By direction of Ramsay M. Cox, I endorse service of the within citation; acknowledged this 11th May, 1836.

S. D. Livingston, Clk.”

The entering of an 'acknowledgment of service of a citation upon its back, by the clerk of the inferior court, is a mode of service unknown to the law, and void.

The cause must, therefore, be dismissed with costs.

Judge Trotter having presided in the court below, on the trial of this cause, gave no opinion.
#### LEWERETT V. J. S. CARROLL MERCANTILE CO.

(Decided January 20, 1914.)

Appeal from Pike Law Court.

Heard before Hon. T. L. Borum.

*669No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>
 
                      AMENDMENT TO 1986 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                             THE DWYER GROUP, INC.



WHEREAS, on May 8, 1986, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the 
establishment of an Employee Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") whereby incentive 
and non-incentive options would be granted to employees, officers and directors 
of the Company; and

WHEREAS, the Plan was adopted by the shareholders of the Company; and

WHEREAS, on February 27, 1997, the Board of Directors unanimously approved, 
subject to shareholder approval, an amendment to the Plan that would increase 
the number of shares available under the Plan from 500,000 to 700,000 and 
recommended that the amendment be submitted to the shareholders of the Company 
for approval; and

WHEREAS, at the Company's Annual Meeting of Shareholders on July 31, 1997, the 
shareholders voted in favor of the proposed amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Plan is hereby amended to increase the 
number of shares available under the Plan from 500,000 to 700,000.

I hereby certify that the above described amendment was voted on and approved by
the Company's shareholders at the Company's Annual Meeting of Shareholders held 
July 31, 1997.




        8/6/97                                       /s/ THOMAS J. BUCKLEY
-------------------                                  ---------------------
Date                                                 Thomas J. Buckley
                                                     Chief Financial Officer