alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10361]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)


Notice of a Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a meeting 
of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 
(SAMHSA) National Advisory Council in May 2000.
    The meeting will be open and will include the Administrator's 
update, follow up to the January 20-21 SAMHSA National Advisory Council 
meeting and the May 10-11 SAMHSA Joint Council Meeting, status reports 
by the Council's workgroups on Parity and Co-occurring Addictive and 
Mental Health Disorders, discussion on the Household Survey on Drug 
Abuse and the fiscal year 2001 Budget, and a discussion on SAMHSA's 
Technical Assistance Project (a process for collecting customer 
satisfaction and outcome data being provided through the Block Grants), 
and other issues of interest.
    Attendance by the public will be limited to space available. Public 
comments are welcome. Please communicate with the individual listed as 
contact below to make arrangements to comment or to request special 
accommodations for persons with disabilities.
    Substantive program information, a summary of the meeting, and a 
roster of Council members may be obtained from the contact whose name 
and telephone number is listed below.

    Committee Name: SAMHSA National Advisory Council.
    Date/Time: May 12, 2000, 9 a.m. to 2:50 p.m.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Pooks Hill Hotel, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20814.
    Open: May 12, 2000, 9 a.m. to 2:50 p.m.
    Contact: Toian Vaughn, Executive Secretary, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Room 17-89, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: (301) 443-4266; FAX: 
(301) 443-1587 and e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4531332430222d2b053624282d36246b222a33"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e19597809486898fa192808c899280cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 18, 2000.
Toian Vaughn,
Committee Management Officer/Executive Secretary, Substance Abuse and 
Mental Health Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-10361 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Schedule D

List of Main Statutes Preempted by PROMESA

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23663-4 Filed:03/01/23 Entered:03/01/23 23:30:40 Desc:

Schedule D Page 1 of 3
2

List of Main Statutes Preempted by PROMESA1

Statutory Provisions Bondholder Rights and Remedies

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 207 (providing bondholders a right to receivership in certain

circumstances)

2. 22 L.P.R.A. § 208 (providing bondholders certain rights and remedies against PREPA)

Statutory Provisions Concerning Issuance and Terms of Bonds 

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 195a-1(o), as amended by Act 17-2019, to require PREB approval of bond

issuances under certain circumstances.

2. Act 101-2020 (providing AAFAF certain approval rights over bond issuances by Puerto

Rico instrumentalities)

Statutes Concerning Means of Implementation of the Plan 

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 195a-1(u), as amended by Act 17-2019, to require PREB approval for,

among other things, the sale or transfer of PREPA’s property, and may include

limitations on the creation of subsidiaries or trusts, or the taking of any actions or

measures as are necessary or convenient to exercise PREPA’s power granted under its

enabling act.

Statutes Concerning the Contribution in Lieu of Taxes and subsidies 

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 212(b), to establish the Contribution in Lieu of Taxes (CILT) mechanism

by which PREPA compensate municipalities.

2

2. 22 L.P.R.A. § 814, to establish limitations to the future creation of any new electric

power service subsidy, credit, or grant.3

Statutes Concerning Retirement

1. Act 106-2017 (to the extent it does not allow participants in the PREPA ERS to

participate in the Act 106 defined contribution plan).

Statutes enacted prior to PROMESA concerning the Restructuring of PREPA’s debt 

1

 The statutes listed herein are preempted for the reasons and solely to the extent set forth in Exhibit “A” to the 

Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

The Debtor reserves the right to amend this list prior to the entry of the PREPA Confirmation Order.

2 This provision is preempted solely to the extent it could be interpreted to exempt municipalities from paying the 

Legacy Charge. 

3 This provision is preempted solely to the extent it could be interpreted to restrict the creation of a new subsidy for

low-income customers relating to the Legacy Charge. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23663-4 Filed:03/01/23 Entered:03/01/23 23:30:40 Desc:

Schedule D Page 2 of 3
3

1. 22 L.P.R.A § 1054x-1 (establishing the procedure by which the PREB had to determine 

and review the transition charges and adjustment mechanisms).

2. 22 L.P.R.A § 1054b(q) (to the extent, if any, it provides PREB certain approval review 

and approval over PREPA bond issuances under Title III). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23663-4 Filed:03/01/23 Entered:03/01/23 23:30:40 Desc:

Schedule D Page 3 of 3
§ 121.373 Continuing analysis and surveillance. ( a ) Each certificate holder shall establish and maintain a system for the continuing analysis and surveillance of the performance and effectiveness of its inspection program and the program covering other maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alterations and for the correction of any deficiency in those programs, regardless of whether those programs are carried out by the certificate holder or by another person.
( b ) Whenever the Administrator finds that either or both of the programs described in paragraph (a) of this section does not contain adequate procedures and standards to meet the requirements of this part, the certificate holder shall, after notification by the Administrator, make any changes in those programs that are necessary to meet those requirements.
( c ) A certificate holder may petition the Administrator to reconsider the notice to make a change in a program. The petition must be filed with the responsible Flight Standards office charged with the overall inspection of the certificate holder's operations within 30 days after the certificate holder receives the notice. Except in the case of an emergency requiring immediate action in the interest of safety, the filing of the petition stays the notice pending a decision by the Administrator.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19210, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-207, 54 FR 39293, Sept. 25, 1989; Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2611, Jan. 26, 1996; Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 121-380, 83 FR 9173, Mar. 5, 2018]
Confidential

CAS

Report

Removed
Martin, Michael (OST) 

"TraTtr 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

To Whom it Concerns: 

Tim Lavin [tlavin@balancebpo.com] 

Tuesday, January 24, 2012 11:32 AM 

EAS (OST) 

l\/laine Essential Air Service (EAS) 

^ORWiOM 

OPERATIONS 

-PR .. ? '^ ip: c;' 

I am writing to plead for your support to continue the EAS for Northern Maine. 

I am an entrepreneur - President and CEO of BalanceBPO Inc. (www.balancebpo.com) - and I am bringing 

much needed jobs to Presque Isle. Even better, these are call center outsourcing jobs that are returning from 

offshore! While still in start-up, we have a who's who of clients including Google and Pitney Bovves. We 

currently employ 50 people, and we are growing to 250-300 with Fortune 500 and blue chip clients. 

Without direct flights from Boston, we would be in dire trouble. We already fight the fact that we are so rural, 

and even the direct flight from Boston on a 32 pax plane is a challenge. Having a smaller plane that has to stop 

for fuel half way to Boston would make us too remote and too risky for executive travel, and would likely mean 

the loss of many jobs and job opportunities. 

We appreciate the ongoing efforts of Senator Snowe, Senator Collins and others, and again, we humbly ask you 

to continue this vital link. 

Respectfully, 

Tim 

Tim Lavin, President & CEO 

BalanceBPO Inc. 

18 Green Hill Drive 

Presque Isle, Maine 04769 

Office: (877)-734-BIRD [2473] 

Mobile: (512) 484-7058 

www.balancebpo.com 

www.facebook.com/balancebpo 

http://twitter.com/balancebpo 

The iiifomialion cojuaincd in lliis message may be privileged, cotifidfiilial, and proiecled from disclosiiie. If you arc not llic intended lecipicni. or an ejnployee. or ageni 

responsible for delivering this message to the intended reeipient. yon are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this comniunieation is strictly 

prohibited. If yon have received this communication ineiTor. please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting from yoin computer. Opinions, conclusions, and 

other information iti this message that do not relate to official BalanceBPO Inc. business are those of the sender and are neither given nor endorsed by BalanceBPO Inc.
§ ̈¦

Cr

Fa

oad

g

ut

Moose R

ti

k

h R

t

e

oad

aF

C

l Cree

h

h is

Moore

a

F

R

r

oa

t

d

er

Buffalo

dio

Creek

a

d

R

a Ro ek e

Roen Road

awk Cr H

Cu

M

ste

ar

r

s

P

h

i

R

n

o

e

a

v

d

uffine Ro H

ad iew Road

Railroad Cr

oa d

ee

R

k

we

ad

vi

o

e

R

n

 A C

i P

Hibbard

d

Cr

a

e

o

e

R P

k

fi

Ro

s

d

ndo

a

t

Sa

er Road

Railroad

Ri

C

d

ree

ge R

Hibbard C

k

oa

ree

R

d

k

oad

da

S

Flat Road

o

even Mile

R yd

da

n

o

u

R

P

B

ompe

e

ys

t

Pil

t

lar

u

C

ad

r

Scothern Road

B e

o

ee

l

k

t

rn R

sa

bo el

C

Keller W

L a

R

m

VE

e

RI

b rt

ONE

d

Tr Road LOWST l

EL h

O

Y

d t

a e Ro

73

n ag ster Fro t Cu San

WSTONE RI

d

YEL V

LO ER

Cre

h

ht

d

t

2n Canal ek

6

8

I-94

1

1

Mill Creek / Bundy Special

Recreation Management Area

Alternative C

R28E

0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5

Miles

Map 100

T

5

N

T

4

N

R29E

Map scale 1:225,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

94

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Legend

Mill Creek / Bundy SRMA

Interstate

Roads

Bureau of Land Management

Bureau of Reclamation

Division of State Lands

State Fish and Wildlife

Water

Private

Public Lands Survey System

Streams

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings 

Field 

Office

Ü
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THESE NUMBERS PERTAIN TO 1998
</LEGEND>                     
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-28-1998              JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                               1717                   1,532  
<SECURITIES>                          0                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                       31,295                  31,128
<ALLOWANCES>                         1,943                   2,229
<INVENTORY>                         48,442                  50,753      
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    82,877                  86,222  
<PP&E>                              85,557                  86,988
<DEPRECIATION>                      34,138                  35,456
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     149,357                 152,285   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               36,754                  37,110 
<BONDS>                                  0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0                       0
<PREFERRED>                              0                       0
<COMMON>                               137                     140  
<OTHER-SE>                          51,490                  57,183
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       149,357                 152,285  
<SALES>                             57,691                 119,554
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    57,691                 119,554
<CGS>                               43,546                  90,136
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       51,298                 106,238 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        34                      82
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        75                     385
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   1,084                   2,186 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      5,275                  11,048  
<INCOME-TAX>                         2,005                   4,198
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  3,270                   6,850
<DISCONTINUED>                           0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0                       0
<CHANGES>                                0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                         3,270                   6,850    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .48                     .99 
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .41                     .86
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

No. 95-7843

SERGEANT THOMAS; GUARD THISSEN;

J. B. FRENCH, Warden; LYNN

PHILLIPS; ACCOUNTING CLERK LONG,

Defendants-Appellees.

CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

No. 95-7855

SERGEANT THOMAS; GUARD THISSEN;

J. B. FRENCH, Warden; LYNN

PHILLIPS; ACCOUNTING CLERK LONG,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge.

(CA-94-957-5-H)

Submitted: January 18, 1996

Decided: February 13, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and

CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
No. 95-7843 dismissed and No. 95-7855 affirmed by unpublished per

curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

In No. 95-7843, Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for the appointment of counsel and recusal of the district court judge. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ.

P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss No.

95-7843 as interlocutory.

Appellant also appeals from the district court's order dismissing

the action pursuant to Appellant's notice of voluntary dismissal, No.

95-7855. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. Tucker v. Thomas, No. CA-94-957-5-H

(E.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

 2
materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

No. 95-7843 - DISMISSED

No. 95-7855 - AFFIRMED

LUTTIG, Circuit Judge, concurring:

Appellant has filed 123 appeals in this court between October 22,

1993, and today. I would impose sanctions against Appellant for

abuse of the judicial process.

 3
#### NANCY McQUAID *v.*CHARLES McQUAID.

Divorce. Cause adultery with Susan Sutton, and wilful absence. It appeared in evidence, that the parties were married in Butler county, in 1829, while he was in custody upon an arrest on her complaint, under the bastardy act. He has ever since refused to live with her. She resides in Cincinnati, works for her living, and sustains a good character. He lives in Butler county, and gambles about. They have no children.

By the Court.

A divorce is decreed, on account of the wilful absence; and the defendant is ordered to pay the costs, and $>502 alimony, in sixty days, or execution to issue.
Editorial Note on Part 702
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 702 appear at 84 FR 1606, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 702.114 Payment of dividends. ( a ) *Restriction on dividends.* Dividends shall be available only from net worth, net of any special reserves established under § 702.112, if any.
( b ) *Payment of dividends and interest refunds.* The board of directors must not pay a dividend or interest refund that will cause the credit union's capital classification to fall below adequately capitalized under this subpart unless the appropriate Regional Director and, if state-chartered, the appropriate state official, have given prior written approval (in an NWRP or otherwise). The request for written approval must include the plan for eliminating any negative retained earnings balance.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 40875 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JUAN MARTINEZ

- GARCIA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:19

- CR

- 967

- 1

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Martinez

Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 201 1). Martinez

- Garcia h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 30, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40875 Document: 00515471472 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2020No. 19

- 40875

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordi ngly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-40875 Document: 00515471472 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/30/2020
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

January 20, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Email received from Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA)

FROM: Angela Cullen

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents an email and attachment received from Tim Blubaugh of EMA to 

Byron Bunker on 1/20/2011.

From: "Timothy A. Blubaugh" [tblubaugh@emamail.org]

Sent: 01/20/2011 12:03 AM GMT

To: Byron Bunker

Subject: Vehicle Classifications

Byron,

Attached is a framework for a workable approach to classifying vehicles for the purposes of the 

GHG/FE regulation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Regards,

Tim

Timothy A. Blubaugh

Engine Manufacturers Association

333 West Wacker Drive ▪ Suite 810

Chicago, IL ▪ 60606

312.929.1972 direct ▪ 312.208.0948 mobile 

312.929.1975 fax

tblubaugh@emamail.org ▪ www.enginemanufacturers.org
#### § 1216.100 Scope.

This subpart sets forth NASA policy on environmental quality and control and the responsibilities of NASA officials in carrying out these policies.
APPENDIX F 

PRODUCT FORMULATIONS CONTAINING MULTIPLE ACTIVE 

INGREDIENTS FOR POTASSIUM NITRATE 

The Agency does not routinely include, in its risk assessments, an evaluation of mixtures 

of active ingredients, either those mixtures of multiple active ingredients in product 

formulations or those in the applicator’s tank. In the case of the product formulations of 

active ingredients (that is, a registered product containing more than one active 

ingredient), each active ingredient is subject to an individual risk assessment for 

regulatory decision regarding the active ingredient on a particular use site. If effects data 

are available for a formulated product containing more than one active ingredient, they 

may be used qualitatively or quantitatively1

 2. 

There are no product LD50 values, with associated 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) 

available for potassium nitrate. 

As discussed in USEPA (2000) a quantitative component-based evaluation of mixture 

toxicity requires data of appropriate quality for each component of a mixture. In this 

mixture evaluation an LD50 with associated 95% CI is needed for the formulated 

product. The same quality of data is also required for each component of the mixture. 

Given that the formulated products for potatssium nitrate do not have LD50 data 

available it is not possible to undertake a quantitative or qualitative analysis for potential 

interactive effects. However, because the active ingredients are not expected to have 

similar mechanisms of action, metabolites, or toxicokinetic behavior, it is reasonable to 

conclude that an assumption of dose-addition would be inappropriate. Consequently, an 

assessment based on the toxicity of potassium nitrate is the only reasonable approach that 

employs the available data to address the potential acute risks of the formulated products. 

 

1

 Overview of the Ecological Risk Assessment Process in the Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 

Protection Agency (January 2004) (Overview Document). 

2

 Memorandum to Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substance, US EPA conveying an evaluation 

by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service of an approach to assessing 

the ecological risks of pesticide products (January 2004). 
Pesticide Products Formulated with Potassium Nitrate and Other Pesticide Active Ing

POTASSIUM NITRATE PRODUCTS 3

PRODUCT 

ADJUSTED FOR ACTIV

INGREDIENT 

PRODUCT/TRADE 

NAME EPA Reg.No. 

% 

Potassium 

Nitrate 

LD 504

(mg/kg) CI (mg/kg) LD50 (mg/kg) CI (mg

Smoke’em 000004-0463 46.2 No Data No Data No Data No DaDexol Gopher Gasser 000192-00049 45 >5000 

N/A 

Limit Dose No Data No Da

Revenge Rodent Smoke Bomb 009086-00004 38.8 No Data No Data No Data No Da

3 From registrant submitted data to support registration. Compiled by Office of Pesticide Programs Registration and Health Effects Div

N/A= Not Applicable