##### Table of Contents

---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 10-Q



---

(Mark One)



| | x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 or



| |  ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the transition period from
 to

Commission file number 0-16518



---

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its
charter)



---



|                                                               |  |                                        
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Georgia                                                        |  | 58-1678709                             
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|                                                               | 
|6200 The Corners Pkwy., Norcross, Georgia                      |  | 30092-3365                             
|(Address of principal executive offices)                       |  | (Zip Code)                             
|                                                               | 
|Registrants telephone number, including area code             |  | (770) 449-7800                         

N/A

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether
the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer ̈Accelerated filer ̈Non-accelerated filer  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ̈No  x



---





---

##### Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund II (the Partnership or the Registrant) other than historical facts may
be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans,
strategies, and prospects and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended
to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will, expect, intend,
anticipate, estimate, believe, continue, or other similar words. Specifically, we consider, among others, statements concerning future operating results and cash flows, our ability to meet future
obligations, and the amount and timing of any future distributions to limited partners to be forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date this
report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We make no representations or warranties (express or implied) about the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q, and we do not intend to publicly update
or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Any such forward-looking statements are
subject to unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors and are based on a number of assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive, and market conditions, all of which are difficult or
impossible to predict accurately. To the extent that our assumptions differ from actual results, our ability to meet such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations, provide distributions to
partners, and maintain the value of our real estate properties, may be significantly hindered. See Item 1A. in the Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 for a discussion of some of the risks and
uncertainties, although not all risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements.



Page 2



---

##### Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



TABLE OF CONTENTS



|         |  |                       |  |                                                                                                                               |  |         
|-------- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------
|         |  |                       |  |                                                                                                                               |  | Page No.
|         |  |                      
|PART I.  |  | FINANCIAL INFORMATION |  |                                                                                                                              
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 1.               |  | Financial Statements                                                                                                          |  |         
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  |                       |  | Balance Sheets September 30, 2007 (unaudited) and December 31, 2006                                                          |  | 5       
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  |                       |  | Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited)       |  | 6       
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  |                       |  | Statements of Partners Capital for the Year Ended December 31, 2006 and the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 (unaudited) |  | 7       
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  |                       |  | Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited)                        |  | 8       
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  |                       |  | Condensed Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)                                                                           |  | 9       
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 2.               |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations                                         |  | 16      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 3.               |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk                                                                    |  | 21      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 4.               |  | Controls and Procedures                                                                                                       |  | 21      
|         |  |                      
|PART II. |  | OTHER INFORMATION     |  |                                                                                                                              
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 1.               |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                                                             |  | 22      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 1A.              |  | Risk Factors                                                                                                                  |  | 22      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 2.               |  | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds                                                                   |  | 22      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 3.               |  | Defaults Upon Senior Securities                                                                                               |  | 22      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 4.               |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                                                           |  | 22      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 5.               |  | Other Information                                                                                                             |  | 22      
|         |  |                       | 
|         |  | Item 6.               |  | Exhibits                                                                                                                      |  | 22      



Page 3



---

##### Table of Contents

|PART I. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|------- | ---------------------



|ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|------- | --------------------

The information furnished in the
Partnerships accompanying balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations, partners capital, and cash flows reflects all adjustments that are, in managements opinion, necessary for a fair and consistent presentation of the
aforementioned financial statements.

The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the Partnerships
financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included both in this report on Form 10-Q and in the Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The Partnerships results of operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results expected for the full year.



Page 4



---

##### Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



BALANCE SHEETS

ASSETS



|                                               |  |                           |            |              |   |           
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ---------- | ------------ | - | ----------
|                                               |  | (Unaudited) September 30, |            | December 31,
|                                               |  | 2007                      |            | 2006        
|Investment in Fund II and Fund II-OW           |  | $                         | 7,478,947  |              | $ | 7,881,412 
|Due from Fund II and Fund II-OW                |  |                           | 3,312,892  |              |   | 3,137,437 
|Cash and cash equivalents                      |  |                           | 116,840    |              |   | 116,840   
|                                               |  |                           |            |              |   |           
|Total assets                                   |  | $                         | 10,908,679 |              | $ | 11,135,689
|                                               |  |                           |            |              |   |           
|                                               |  |                           |            |              |   |           
|LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL             
|                                               |  |                           |            |              |   |           
|PARTNERS CAPITAL:                             |  |                           |            |              |   |           
|Limited partners:                              |  |                           |            |              |   |           
|Class A  108,572 units issued and outstanding |  | $                         | 10,908,679 |              | $ | 11,135,689
|Class B  30,221 units issued and outstanding  |  |                           | 0          |              |   | 0         
|General partners                               |  |                           | 0          |              |   | 0         
|                                               |  |                           |            |              |   |           
|Total partners capital                        |  |                           | 10,908,679 |              |   | 11,135,689
|                                               |  |                           |            |              |   |           
|Total liabilities and partners capital        |  | $                         | 10,908,679 |              | $ | 11,135,689
|                                               |  |                           |            |              |   |           

See accompanying notes.



Page 5



---

##### Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS



|                                         |  |                                              |         |   |                                             |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|---------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------- | ------- | - | ------------------------------------------- | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | -------- | - |  | - | -------- | -
|                                         |  | (Unaudited) Three Months Ended September 30, |         |   | (Unaudited) Nine Months Ended September 30, |  
|                                         |  | 2007                                         |         |   | 2006                                        |   |         | 2007 |  |   | 2006     |  
|                                         |  |                                              |         |  
|EQUITY IN LOSS OF FUND II AND FUND II-OW |  | $                                            | (74,758 | ) |                                             | $ | (21,450 | )    |  | $ | (227,010 | ) |  | $ | (459,977 | )
|                                         |  |                                              |         |   |                                             |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|                                         |  |                                              |         |  
|NET LOSS                                 |  | $                                            | (74,758 | ) |                                             | $ | (21,450 | )    |  | $ | (227,010 | ) |  | $ | (459,977 | )
|                                         |  |                                              |         |   |                                             |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|                                         |  |                                              |         |  
|NET LOSS ALLOCATED TO LIMITED PARTNERS:  |  |                                              |         |   |                                             |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|CLASS A                                  |  | $                                            | (74,758 | ) |                                             | $ | (21,450 | )    |  | $ | (227,010 | ) |  | $ | (459,977 | )
|                                         |  |                                              |         |   |                                             |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|CLASS B                                  |  | $                                            | 0       |   |                                             | $ | 0       |      |  | $ | 0        |   |  | $ | 0        |  
|                                         |  |                                              |         |   |                                             |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|                                         |  |                                              |         |  
|NET LOSS PER LIMITED PARTNER UNIT:       |  |                                              |         |   |                                             |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|CLASS A                                  |  |                                              | $(0.69  | ) |                                             |   | $(0.20  | )    |  |   | $(2.09   | ) |  |   | $(4.24   | )
|                                         |  |                                              |         |   |                                             |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  
|CLASS B                                  |  |                                              | $ 0.00  |   |                                             |   | $ 0.00  |      |  |   | $ 0.00   |   |  |   | $ 0.00   |  
|                                         |  |                                              |         |   |                                             |   |         |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |          |  

See accompanying notes.



Page 6



---

##### Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS CAPITAL

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006

AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 (UNAUDITED)



|                                                                                                 |  |                  |  |        |            |   |                         |                  |        |   |            |   |  |    |  |   |            |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------- |  | ------ | ---------- | - | ----------------------- | ---------------- | ------ | - | ---------- | - |  | -- |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                                                 |  | Limited Partners |  |        |            |   | Total Partners Capital |                 
|                                                                                                 |  | Class A          |  |        | Class B    |   |                         | General Partners |       
|                                                                                                 |  | Units            |  | Amount |            |   | Units                   |                  | Amount |   |            |  
|                                                                                                 |  |                  |  |        |            |  
|BALANCE, December 31, 2005                                                                       |  | 108,572          |  | $      | 17,677,311 |   |                         | 30,221           |        | $ | 0          |   |  | $0 |  | $ | 17,677,311 |  
|                                                                                                 |  |                  |  |        |            |  
|Net income (loss)                                                                                |  | 0                |  |        | (6,538,481 | ) |                         | 0                |        |   | 5,996,859  |   |  | 0  |  |   | (541,622   | )
|Distributions of net sale proceeds($0.03 and $198.43 per Class A and Class B Unit, respectively) |  | 0                |  |        | (3,141     | ) |                         | 0                |        |   | (5,996,859 | ) |  | 0  |  |   | (6,000,000 | )
|                                                                                                 |  |                  |  |        |            |   |                         |                  |        |   |            |   |  |    |  |   |            |  
|BALANCE, December 31, 2006                                                                       |  | 108,572          |  |        | 11,135,689 |   |                         | 30,221           |        |   | 0          |   |  | 0  |  |   | 11,135,689 |  
|                                                                                                 |  |                  |  |        |            |  
|Net loss                                                                                         |  | 0                |  |        | (227,010   | ) |                         | 0                |        |   | 0          |   |  | 0  |  |   | (227,010   | )
|                                                                                                 |  |                  |  |        |            |   |                         |                  |        |   |            |   |  |    |  |   |            |  
|BALANCE, September 30, 2007                                                                      |  | 108,572          |  | $      | 10,908,679 |   |                         | 30,221           |        | $ | 0          |   |  | $0 |  | $ | 10,908,679 |  
|                                                                                                 |  |                  |  |        |            |   |                         |                  |        |   |            |   |  |    |  |   |            |  

See accompanying notes.



Page 7



---

##### Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS



|                                                                                |  |                               |          |   |      |   |          |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | -------- | - | ---- | - | -------- | -
|                                                                                |  | (Unaudited) Nine Months Ended |         
|                                                                                |  | September 30,                 |         
|                                                                                |  | 2007                          |          |   | 2006 |  
|CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                                           |  |                               |          |   |      |   |          |  
|Net loss                                                                        |  | $                             | (227,010 | ) |      | $ | (459,977 | )
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |                               |          |   |      |   |          |  
|Equity in loss of Fund II and Fund II-OW                                        |  |                               | 227,010  |   |      |   | 459,977  |  
|                                                                                |  |                               |          |   |      |   |          |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                       |  |                               | 0        |   |      |   | 0        |  
|                                                                                |  |                               |          |   |      |   |          |  
|CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS                                             |  |                               | 0        |   |      |   | 0        |  
|                                                                                |  |                              
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period                                  |  |                               | 116,840  |   |      |   | 116,840  |  
|                                                                                |  |                               |          |   |      |   |          |  
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period                                        |  | $                             | 116,840  |   |      | $ | 116,840  |  
|                                                                                |  |                               |          |   |      |   |          |  

See accompanying notes.



Page 8



---

##### Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 (unaudited)



|1. | ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
|-- | -------------------------

Wells Real Estate Fund II (the
Partnership) is a public limited partnership organized on June 23, 1986 under the laws of the state of Georgia with Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Capital, Inc. (Wells Capital), a Georgia corporation, serving as
its general partners (collectively, the General Partners). Wells Capital is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. (WREF). Leo F. Wells, III is the president and sole director of Wells Capital and the
president, sole director, and sole owner of WREF. The Partnership has two classes of limited partnership interests, Class A and Class B Units. Limited partners may vote to, among other things, (a) amend the partnership agreement,
subject to certain limitations; (b) change the business purpose or investment objectives of the Partnership; and (c) remove a general partner. A majority vote on any of the above-described matters will bind the Partnership, without the
concurrence of the General Partners. Each limited partnership unit has equal voting rights, regardless of class.

On September 8, 1986, the
Partnership commenced an offering of up to $50,000,000 of Class A or Class B limited partnership units ($250.00 per unit) pursuant to a Registration Statement filed on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933. The offering was terminated on
September 7, 1988, at which time the Partnership had sold approximately 139,793 Class A and Class B Units representing capital contributions of $34,948,250. Following the termination of the offering, the Partnership repurchased 1,000
limited partnership units.

The Partnership owns interests in all of its real estate assets through its interest in Fund II and Fund II-OW, a joint venture
between the Partnership and Wells Real Estate Fund II-OW. Fund II and Fund II-OW owns interests in real estate assets both directly and through joint ventures with other entities affiliated with the General Partners. During the periods presented,
the Partnership owned interests in the following joint ventures (the Joint Ventures) and properties:



|                                                           |  |                                                               |  |                                                                                        
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Joint Venture                                              |  | Joint Venture Partners                                        |  | Properties                                                                             
|Fund II and Fund II-OW                                     |  |   Wells Real Estate Fund II   Wells Real Estate Fund II-OW  |  | 1. Louis Rose Building A two-story office building located in Charlotte, North Carolina
|Fund I and Fund II Tucker                                  |  |   Wells Real Estate Fund I   Fund II and Fund II-OW         |  | 2. Heritage Place(1) A commercial office complex located in Tucker,
Georgia            
|Fund II and Fund III Associates (Fund II-III Associates) |  |   Fund II and Fund II-OW   Wells Real Estate Fund III, L.P. |  | 3. Boeing at the Atrium A four-story office building located in Houston, Texas         



| | (1) | The retail component of this property (approximately 30%) was sold in April
2003 and the remaining office component of this property was sold in May 2006.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wells Real Estate Fund I, Wells Real Estate
Fund II-OW, and Wells Real Estate Fund III, L.P. are affiliated with the Partnership through one or more common general partners. Each of the properties described above was acquired on an all-cash basis. For further information regarding the
Joint Ventures and foregoing properties, refer to the Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.



Page 9



---

##### Table of Contents

On May 10, 2006, Fund I and Fund II Tucker sold the office component of Heritage Place to an unrelated third party
for a gross sale price of $4,215,000. As a result of the sale, Fund I and Fund II Tucker received net sale proceeds of approximately $4,028,000, of which approximately $1,834,000 was distributed to the Partnership. As of March 31, 2006, Fund I
and Fund II Tucker recognized an impairment loss of approximately $795,000 in order to reduce the carrying value of Heritage Place to its estimated fair value, less costs to sell, and recognized an additional loss on sale of approximately $10,000.
Approximately $362,000 and $5,000 of the impairment loss and loss on sale were allocable to the Partnership, respectively.





|2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|-- | ------------------------------------------

Basis of
Presentation

The financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X, and in accordance with such rules and regulations, do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of the General Partners, the statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments that are of a normal and recurring nature and
necessary to fairly and consistently present the results for such periods. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of full-year results. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes included in the
Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Investment in Fund II and Fund II-OW

The Partnership has evaluated the Joint Ventures and concluded that none are variable interest entities under the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation (FIN) No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which supersedes FIN No. 46 and is an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements. The Partnership does not have control over the operations of Fund II and Fund II-OW; however, it does exercise significant influence. Approval by the Partnership as well as the other joint venture partners is required for any
major decision or any action that would materially affect the Joint Ventures, or their real property investments. Accordingly, upon applying the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 94,
Consolidation of All Majority-Owned Subsidiaries, ARB No. 51, and Statement of Position (SOP) No. 78-9, Accounting for Investments In Real Estate Ventures, the Partnership accounts for its investments in Fund II
and Fund II-OW using the equity method of accounting, whereby original investments are recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for contributions, distributions, and net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership. Pursuant to the terms of the
joint venture agreements, all income (loss) and distributions are allocated to joint venture partners in accordance with their respective ownership interests. Distributions of net cash from operations, if available, are generally distributed to the
joint venture partners on a quarterly basis.

Distribution of Net Cash from Operations

Net cash from operations, if available, is generally distributed to limited partners quarterly. In accordance with the partnership agreement, such distributions are paid first to each limited partner holding
Class A Units until he has received an 8% per annum return on his adjusted capital contributions, as defined. Net cash from operations is then distributed to each limited partner holding Class B Units until he has received an 8% per
annum return on his adjusted capital contributions, as defined. Any excess net cash from operations would then be distributed to the General Partners until they have received 10% of the total distributions for the year. Thereafter, net cash from
operations is distributed 90% to the limited partners and 10% to the General Partners.



Page 10



---

##### Table of Contents

Distribution of Net Sale Proceeds

Under the terms of the partnership agreement, as amended effective January 1, 2000, after satisfying all debts and liabilities and establishing such reserves as the General Partners in their sole discretion deem
reasonably necessary, net sale proceeds from the sale of the Partnerships properties, unless reserved, are to be distributed to partners in the following order:



| |  |  | To limited partners holding Class B Units until they have received an amount equal to the net cash available for distribution previously received by limited
partners holding Class A Units on a per-unit basis;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To all limited partners on a per-unit basis until limited partners have received 100% of their respective net capital contributions, as defined in the partnership
agreement, plus a cumulative 12% per annum return on their respective net capital contributions (less the sum of all prior distributions to such limited partner); and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Thereafter, 85% to the limited partners on a per-unit basis and 15% to the General Partners.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Allocations of Net Income, Net Loss, and Gain on Sale

For the
purpose of determining allocations per the partnership agreement, net income is defined as net income recognized by the Partnership, excluding deductions for depreciation, amortization, cost recovery, interest expense, and the gain on the sale of
assets. Net income, as defined, of the Partnership will be allocated each year in the same proportions that net cash from operations is distributed to the partners. To the extent the Partnerships net income in any year exceeds net cash from
operations, it will be allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the General Partners.

Net loss, depreciation, and amortization deductions for each
fiscal year will be allocated as follows: (a) 99% to the limited partners holding Class B Units and 1% to the General Partners until their capital accounts are reduced to zero; (b) then, to any partner having a positive balance in his
capital account in an amount not to exceed such positive balance; and (c) thereafter, to the General Partners.

Gains on the sale or exchange of the
Partnerships properties will be allocated as follows: (a) first, to partners having negative capital accounts, if any, until all negative capital accounts have been restored to zero; (b) then, to the limited partners in proportion to
and to the extent of the excess of (i) each limited partners adjusted capital contribution, plus a cumulative 12% per annum return on his adjusted capital contribution, less the sum of all prior distributions of cash flow from
operations previously made to such limited partner, over (ii) such limited partners capital account balance as of the sale date, subject to the requirement to initially allocate gain on sale to limited partners holding Class B Units until
they have been allocated an amount equal to the net cash from operations previously received by limited partners holding Class A Units on a per unit basis; (c) then, to the General Partners in proportion to and to the extent of the excess
of (i) each general partners adjusted capital contribution, over (ii) such general partners capital account balance as of the sale date; and (d) thereafter, 85% to the limited partners and 15% to the General Partners.

Impairment of Real Estate Assets

The Partnership
continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets owned through the Partnerships investment in the Joint Ventures may not be recoverable. When indicators of
potential impairment are present, management assesses whether the respective carrying values will be recovered with the undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition for assets held for use,
or with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that the expected undiscounted future cash flows for assets held for use or the estimated fair value, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale do not
exceed the respective asset carrying value, management adjusts such assets to the respective estimated fair values, as defined by SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, and recognizes an impairment
loss. Estimated fair values are calculated based on the following information, dependent upon availability, in order of preference: (i) recently quoted market prices, (ii) market prices for comparable properties, or (iii) the present
value of undiscounted cash flows, including estimated salvage value.



Page 11



---

##### Table of Contents

Recent Accounting Pronouncements



In June 2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued SOP 07-1, Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting
Guide "Investment Companies" and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies, which provides guidance for determining which entities fall within the scope of the AICPA Audit and Accounting
Guide for Investment Companies and requires additional disclosures for certain of those entities. In October 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) elected to indefinitely defer the effective date of SOP 07-1. As a
result, the Partnership has postponed its evaluation of the provisions of SOP 07-1 and related impact on its financial statements and accompanying notes.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities  Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which
the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Partnership is currently assessing these provisions and evaluating the financial impact
of SFAS No. 159 on its financial statements; however, it is not currently planning to adopt the fair value option in 2008.

In September 2006, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures required for fair value measurements under GAAP, including amending SFAS No. 144.
SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, as opposed to an entity-specific measurement. SFAS No. 157 will be effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2008. The Partnership is currently assessing
these provisions and evaluating the financial impact of SFAS No. 157 on its financial statements, however, does not believe the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on its financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, which clarifies the relevant criteria and approach for the recognition, derecognition, and measurement of uncertain tax positions. FIN No. 48 was effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2007. The adoption of this
pronouncement has not had a material impact on the Partnerships financial statements.



|3. | INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES
|-- | ----------------------------

Impairment of Real Estate Assets

Fund I and Fund II Tucker considered real estate assets to be held for sale, as defined by SFAS No. 144, at the point at which a sale contract is
executed. During first quarter 2006, Fund I and Fund II Tucker recognized an impairment loss of approximately $795,000, of which approximately $362,000 was allocable to the Partnership, to reduce the carrying value of Heritage Place to its fair
value, less costs to sell. This impairment was prompted by a change in managements intended holding period for this asset. This impairment loss is included in loss from discontinued operations from Fund I and Fund II Tucker for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 in the Summary of Financial Information table below.

Summary of Financial Information  Fund II and Fund II-OW

Condensed financial information for Fund II and Fund II-OW for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, is
presented below:



|                   |  |                    |  |                   |  |                   |  |          |  |          |  |            |  |           
|------------------ |  | ------------------ |  | ----------------- |  | ----------------- |  | -------- |  | -------- |  | ---------- |  | ----------
|Total Revenues     |  | Net Loss           |  | Total Revenues    |  | Net Loss         
|Three Months Ended |  | Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended
|September 30,      |  | September 30,      |  | September 30,     |  | September 30,    
|2007               |  | 2006               |  | 2007              |  | 2006              |  | 2007     |  | 2006     |  | 2007       |  | 2006      
|$44,153            |  | $123,264           |  | $(78,950)         |  | $(22,653)         |  | $129,425 |  | $302,479 |  | $(239,740) |  | $(485,773)
|                   |  |                    |  |                   |  |                   |  |          |  |          |  |            |  |           



Page 12



---

##### Table of Contents

Fund I and Fund II Tucker reevaluated the recoverability of the carrying value of Heritage Place pursuant to the
Partnerships policy for evaluating and accounting for the impairment of real estate assets described above. Fund I and Fund II Tucker determined that the carrying value of the related real estate assets of Heritage Place was not recoverable as
compared to the estimated fair value, primarily as a result of reducing the estimated holding period of such assets. Accordingly, Fund I and Fund II Tucker reduced the carrying value of such real estate assets to the estimated fair value by
recognizing an impairment loss of approximately $795,000 in the first quarter of 2006, of which approximately $362,000 is allocable to the Partnership. This impairment loss is included in loss from discontinued operations from Fund I and Fund II
Tucker for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 in the table below.

Condensed financial information for the joint ventures in which the
Partnership held interests through its equity interest in Fund II and Fund II-OW for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, is presented below:



|                          |  |                    |           |                                         |   |           |                                           |   |         |                    |  |      |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |          |  
|------------------------- |  | ------------------ | --------- | --------------------------------------- | - | --------- | ----------------------------------------- | - | ------- | ------------------ |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | - | ------ | ---- |  | - | -------- | - |  | - | ------- | - |  | - | -------- | -
|                          |  | Total Revenues     |           | Income (Loss) FromContinuing Operations |   |           | Income (Loss) FromDiscontinued Operations |   |         | Net Income (Loss)  | 
|                          |  | Three Months Ended |           | Three Months Ended                      |   |           | Three Months Ended                        |   |         | Three Months Ended | 
|                          |  | September 30,      |           | September 30,                           |   |           | September 30,                             |   |         | September 30,      | 
|                          |  | 2007               |           | 2006                                    |   | 2007      |                                           |   | 2006    |                    |  | 2007 |         |   | 2006 |   |        | 2007 |  |   | 2006     |  
|Fund I and Fund II Tucker |  | $                  | 0         |                                         | $ | 97        |                                           | $ | 0       |                    |  | $    | (10,991 | ) |      | $ | 0      |      |  | $ | (6,136   | ) |  | $ | 0       |   |  | $ | (17,127  | )
|Fund II-III Associates    |  |                    | 556,709   |                                         |   | 461,910   |                                           |   | 138,619 |                    |  |      | 41,178  |   |      |   | 335    |      |  |   | 932      |   |  |   | 138,954 |   |  |   | 42,110   |  
|                          |  |                    |           |                                         |   |           |                                           |   |         |                    |  |      |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |          |  
|                          |  | $                  | 556,709   |                                         | $ | 462,007   |                                           | $ | 138,619 |                    |  | $    | 30,187  |   |      | $ | 335    |      |  | $ | (5,204   | ) |  | $ | 138,954 |   |  | $ | 24,983   |  
|                          |  |                    |           |                                         |   |           |                                           |   |         |                    |  |      |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |          |  
|                          |  |                    |           |                                        
|                          |  | Total Revenues     |           | Income (Loss) FromContinuing Operations |   |           | Income (Loss) FromDiscontinued Operations |   |         | Net Income (Loss)  | 
|                          |  | Nine Months Ended  |           | Nine Months Ended                       |   |           | Nine Months Ended                         |   |         | Nine Months Ended  | 
|                          |  | September 30,      |           | September 30,                           |   |           | September 30,                             |   |         | September 30,      | 
|                          |  | 2007               |           | 2006                                    |   | 2007      |                                           |   | 2006    |                    |  | 2007 |         |   | 2006 |   |        | 2007 |  |   | 2006     |  
|Fund I and Fund II Tucker |  | $                  | 0         |                                         | $ | 2,286     |                                           | $ | (2,263  | )                  |  | $    | (21,795 | ) |      | $ | (1,899 | )    |  | $ | (816,278 | ) |  | $ | (4,162  | ) |  | $ | (838,073 | )
|Fund II-III Associates    |  |                    | 1,553,500 |                                         |   | 1,389,112 |                                           |   | 344,298 |                    |  |      | 204,552 |   |      |   | 2,245  |      |  |   | 3,417    |   |  |   | 346,543 |   |  |   | 207,969  |  
|                          |  |                    |           |                                         |   |           |                                           |   |         |                    |  |      |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |          |  
|                          |  | $                  | 1,553,500 |                                         | $ | 1,391,398 |                                           | $ | 342,035 |                    |  | $    | 182,757 |   |      | $ | 346    |      |  | $ | (812,861 | ) |  | $ | 342,381 |   |  | $ | (630,104 | )
|                          |  |                    |           |                                         |   |           |                                           |   |         |                    |  |      |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |          |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |          |  

The Partnership allocates its share of earnings generated by the properties owned by the Joint Ventures to its
Class A and Class B limited partners pursuant to the partnership agreement provisions outlined in Note 2 for net income, net loss, and gain (loss) on sale, respectively. The components of income (loss) from discontinued operations
recognized by the Joint Ventures results are provided below:



|                          |  |                                      |        |   |                                      |    |              |    |       |   |        |                        |  |   |                 |   |  |              |          |   |       |   |        |   |  |   |          |  
|------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | ------ | - | ------------------------------------ | -- | ------------ | -- | ----- | - | ------ | ---------------------- |  | - | --------------- | - |  | ------------ | -------- | - | ----- | - | ------ | - |  | - | -------- | -
|                          |  | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |        |   | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 |   
|                          |  | OperatingIncome (Loss)               |        |   | Impairment Loss                      |    | Loss on Sale |    | Total |   |        | OperatingIncome (Loss) |  |   | Impairment Loss |   |  | Loss on Sale |          |   | Total |  
|Fund I and Fund II Tucker |  | $                                    | (1,899 | ) |                                      | $0 |              | $0 |       | $ | (1,899 | )                      |  | $ | (12,233         | ) |  | $            | (794,812 | ) |       | $ | (9,233 | ) |  | $ | (816,278 | )
|Fund II-III Associates    |  |                                      | 2,245  |   |                                      | 0  |              | 0  |       |   | 2,245  |                        |  |   | 3,417           |   |  |              | 0        |   |       |   | 0      |   |  |   | 3,417    |  
|                          |  |                                      |        |   |                                      |    |              |    |       |   |        |                        |  |   |                 |   |  |              |          |   |       |   |        |   |  |   |          |  
|                          |  | $                                    | 346    |   |                                      | $0 |              | $0 |       | $ | 346    |                        |  | $ | (8,816          | ) |  | $            | (794,812 | ) |       | $ | (9,233 | ) |  | $ | (812,861 | )
|                          |  |                                      |        |   |                                      |    |              |    |       |   |        |                        |  |   |                 |   |  |              |          |   |       |   |        |   |  |   |          |  



Page 13



---

##### Table of Contents

Due from Fund II and Fund II-OW

As presented in the accompanying balance sheets, due from Fund II and Fund II-OW represents the following cash flows generated by Fund II and Fund II-OW, which are attributable to the Partnership as of
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006:



|                     |  |                          |           |                         |   |          
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------ | --------- | ----------------------- | - | ---------
|                     |  | As of September 30, 2007 |           | As of December 31, 2006
|Operating cash flows |  | $                        | 837,853   |                         | $ | 662,398  
|Net sale proceeds    |  |                          | 2,475,039 |                         |   | 2,475,039
|                     |  |                          |           |                         |   |          
|                     |  | $                        | 3,312,892 |                         | $ | 3,137,437
|                     |  |                          |           |                         |   |          



|4. | RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|-- | --------------------------

Management and Leasing Fees

In accordance with the property management and leasing agreement, Wells Management Company, Inc. (Wells Management), an affiliate of the
General Partners, is entitled to compensation for the management and leasing of the Partnerships properties owned through the Joint Ventures equal to (a) 3% for management services and 3% for leasing services of the gross revenues
collected monthly, plus a separate fee for the one-time lease-up of newly constructed properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arms-length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic
area for similar properties, which is assessed periodically based on market studies, or (b) in the case of commercial properties leased on a long-term net basis (ten or more years), 1% of the gross revenues except for initial leasing fees equal
to 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term. Management and leasing fees are paid by the Joint Ventures and, accordingly, included in equity in loss of Fund II and Fund II-OW in the accompanying statements of operations.
The Partnerships share of management and leasing fees and lease acquisition costs incurred through the Joint Ventures is $25,915 and $17,970 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $55,478 and $60,890 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Administrative Reimbursements

Wells Capital, one of the General Partners, and Wells Management perform certain administrative services for the Partnership and the Joint Ventures, relating to
accounting and other partnership administration, and incur the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among various other entities affiliated with the General Partners based on time spent on each fund by individual administrative personnel.
In the opinion of the General Partners, this allocation is a reasonable estimation of such expenses. The administrative charges related to the Partnership are recorded by Fund II and Fund II-OW and, therefore, are included in equity in loss of
Fund II and Fund II-OW in the accompanying statements of operations. The Partnerships share of administrative costs reimbursed to Wells Capital and Wells Management recorded by Fund II and Fund II-OW is $43,681 and $36,314 for the three months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $139,588 and $110,333 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Economic Dependency

We have engaged Wells Capital and Wells Management to provide certain essential services for us, including supervision
of the management and leasing of our properties, asset acquisition and disposition services, as well as other administrative responsibilities, including accounting services and investor communications and relations. These agreements are terminable
by either party upon 60 days written notice. As a result of these relationships, we are dependent upon Wells Capital and Wells Management.



Page 14



---

##### Table of Contents

Wells Capital and Wells Management are all owned and controlled by WREF. The operations of Wells Capital and Wells
Management represent substantially all of the business of WREF. Accordingly, we focus on the financial condition of WREF when assessing the financial condition of Wells Capital and Wells Management. In the event that WREF were to become unable to
meet its obligations as they become due, we might be required to find alternative service providers.

Future net income generated by WREF will be largely
dependent upon the amount of fees earned by Wells Capital and Wells Management based on, among other things, the level of investor proceeds raised from the sale of common stock for certain WREF-sponsored programs and the volume of future
acquisitions and dispositions of real estate assets by WREF-sponsored programs, as well as anticipated dividend income earned from its holdings of common stock of Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (Piedmont REIT), formerly known as
Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. In addition, WREF guarantees unsecured debt of $160 million held by another WREF-sponsored product that is in the start-up phase of its operations. As of September 30, 2007, the General Partners believe
that WREF generates adequate cash flow from operations and has adequate liquidity available in the form of cash on hand and current receivables necessary to meet its current and future obligations as they become due.

Assertion of Legal Actions Against Related-Parties

On March 12,
2007, a stockholder of Piedmont REIT, formerly known as Wells REIT, filed a putative class action and derivative complaint, styled Washtenaw County Employees Retirement System v. Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., et al., in the
United States District Court for the District of Maryland against, among others, Piedmont REIT, Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Capital, our General Partners, Wells Management, our property manager, certain affiliates of WREF, the directors of
Piedmont REIT, and certain individuals who formerly served as officers or directors of Piedmont REIT prior to the closing of the internalization transaction on April 16, 2007. The complaint alleges, among other things, violations of the federal
proxy rules and breaches of fiduciary duty arising from the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction and the related proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007, as amended. The complaint seeks, among other things, unspecified
monetary damages and nullification of the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction. On April 9, 2007, the District Court denied the plaintiffs motion for an order enjoining the internalization transaction. On April 17, 2007, the
Court granted the defendants motion to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, and the case was docketed in the Northern District of Georgia on April 24, 2007. On June 7, 2007, the
Court granted a motion to designate the class lead plaintiff and class co-lead counsel. On June 27, 2007, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which attempts to assert class action claims on behalf of those persons who received and were
entitled to vote on the Piedmont REIT proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007 and derivative claims on behalf of Piedmont REIT. On July 9, 2007, the Court denied the plaintiffs motion for expedited discovery related
to an anticipated motion for a preliminary injunction. On August 13, 2007, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The motion to dismiss has been fully briefed and is currently pending before the Court. Mr. Wells,
Wells Capital, and Wells Management intend to vigorously defend this action. Any financial loss incurred by Wells Capital, Wells Management, or their affiliates could hinder their ability to successfully manage our operations and our portfolio of
investments.

On August 24, 2007, two stockholders of Piedmont REIT filed a putative derivative complaint, styledDonald and Donna Goldstein,
Derivatively on behalf of Defendant Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. v. Leo F. Wells, III, et. al.,in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia on behalf of Piedmont REIT against, among others, Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Capital,
our General Partners, and a number of individuals who currently or formerly served as officers or directors of Piedmont REIT. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the consideration paid by Piedmont REIT as part of the internalization
transaction was excessive; that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Piedmont REIT; and that the internalization transaction unjustly enriched the defendants. The complaint seeks, among other things, a judgment declaring that the
defendants committed breaches of their fiduciary duties and were unjustly enriched at the expense of Piedmont REIT; monetary damages equal to the amount by which Piedmont REIT was damaged by the defendants; an order awarding



Page 15



---

##### Table of Contents

Piedmont REIT restitution from the defendants and ordering disgorgement of all profits and benefits obtained by the defendants from their wrongful conduct
and fiduciary breaches; an order rescinding the internalization transaction; and the establishment of a constructive trust upon any benefits improperly received by the defendants as a result of their wrongful conduct. On October 19, 2007,
the Court granted the defendants motion for a protective order staying discovery until the Court rules on the defendants motion to dismiss the complaint. On October 31, 2007, the defendants filed their motion to dismiss the
plaintiffs derivative complaint, which is currently pending before the Court. Mr. Wells and Wells Capital intend to vigorously defend this action. Any financial loss incurred by Wells Capital or its affiliates could hinder their
ability to successfully manage our operations and our portfolio of investments.



|5. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|-- | -----------------------------

The Partnership and its General
Partners are from time to time a party to legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of its business. The Partnership is not currently involved in any legal proceedings of which the outcome is reasonably possible to have a material
adverse effect on results of operations or financial condition. The Partnership is not aware of any legal proceedings contemplated by governmental authorities.



|ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements and notes thereto. See also Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements preceding
Part I, as well as the notes to our financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Overview

Management believes that the Partnership typically
operates through the following five key life cycle phases. The duration of each phase is dependent upon various economic, industry, market, and other internal/external factors. Some overlap naturally exists in the transition from one phase to the
next.



| |  |  | Fundraising phase
| | - |  | -----------------

The period
during which the Partnership is raising capital through the sale and issuance of limited partner units to the public;



| |  |  | Investing phase
| | - |  | ---------------

The period
during which the Partnership invests the capital raised during the fundraising phase, less upfront fees, into the acquisition of real estate assets;



| |  |  | Holding phase
| | - |  | -------------

The period
during which the Partnership owns and operates its real estate assets during the initial lease terms of the tenants;



| |  |  | Positioning-for-sale phase
| | - |  | --------------------------

The period during which the leases in place at the time of acquisition expire and, thus, the Partnership expends time, effort, and funds to re-lease such space to existing and/or new tenants. Following the holding phase, the Partnership
continues to own and operate the real estate assets, evaluate various options for disposition, and market the real estate assets for sale; and



| |  |  | Disposition-and-liquidation phase
| | - |  | ---------------------------------

The period during which the Partnership sells its real estate investments, distributes net sale proceeds to the partners, liquidates, and terminates the Partnership.



Page 16



---

##### Table of Contents

Portfolio Overview

We are currently in the disposition-and-liquidation phase of our life cycle. Of the six assets in which we originally owned interests, we have sold four assets. In the fourth quarter of 2006, the majority tenant of Boeing at the Atrium, the
Boeing/Shuttle Division (Boeing), exercised the option to reduce the square footage leased by approximately 46% effective September 18, 2007. During 2007, Fund II-III Associates completed a lease amendment and temporary occupancy
agreement with Boeing to lease back, in aggregate, approximately 3% of the building through March 31, 2008, increasing the total occupancy at Boeing at the Atrium to approximately 57%. We continue to aggressively pursue leasing opportunities
for the Louis Rose Building and the vacancy at Boeing at the Atrium that we believe will ultimately result in the best disposition pricing for our limited partners.

With a number of properties sold, our General Partners are currently reserving operating distributions to limited partners in order to fund our pro-rata share of anticipated re-leasing costs and capital expenditures
for the Louis Rose Building and Boeing at the Atrium. Further, the General Partners anticipate continuing to reserve operating distributions primarily due to the fact that the Louis Rose Building remains vacant and Boeing exercised its option to
reduce the square footage. Once the outcome of the re-leasing efforts is known, the General Partners will evaluate if distributions of net sale proceeds are appropriate.

Property Summary

As we move further into the disposition-and-liquidation phase, we will continue to focus on
re-leasing vacant space and space that may become vacant upon the expiration of our current leases. In doing so, we seek to maximize returns to our limited partners by negotiating long-term leases at market rental rates while attempting to minimize
down time, re-leasing expenditures, ongoing property level costs, and portfolio costs. As the remaining properties are positioned for sale, our attention will shift to locating suitable buyers and negotiating purchase-sale contracts that will
attempt to maximize the total return to our limited partners and minimize contingencies and our post-closing involvement with buyers.

Information relating to the properties owned, or previously owned, by the joint ventures is provided below:



| |  |  | Cherokee Commons was sold on October 1, 2001.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Heritage Place originally included both an office component and a retail shopping center. The retail center, which represented approximately 30% of the premises,
was sold on April 7, 2003. The remaining office component was sold on May 10, 2006.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Brookwood Grill was sold on July 1, 2004.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Holcomb Bridge Property was sold on July 1, 2004.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Louis Rose Building is currently vacant. We are aggressively working on re-leasing this property.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Boeing at the Atrium is currently 57% occupied by Boeing. The existing Boeing lease extends through March 2008. We are marketing the current vacant space for lease.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Our operating strategy entails funding expenditures related to the recurring operations of the Joint Ventures properties and
the portfolio with operating cash flows, including current and prior period operating distributions received from the Joint Ventures, and assessing the amount of remaining cash flows that will be required to fund known future re-leasing costs and
other capital improvements. Any residual operating cash flows are generally considered available for distribution to the limited partners and, unless reserved, are generally paid quarterly. As a result, the ongoing monitoring of our cash position is
critical to ensuring that adequate liquidity and capital resources are available. Economic downturns in one or more of our core markets could adversely impact the ability of our tenants to honor lease payments and our ability to re-lease space on
favorable terms as leases expire or space otherwise becomes vacant. In the event of either situation, cash flows and, consequently, our ability to provide funding for capital needs would be adversely affected.



Page 17



---

##### Table of Contents

Short-Term Liquidity

We did not generate cash flow from operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as Fund II and Fund II-OW has continued to hold operating distributions received from the Joint Ventures and otherwise payable to
the Partnership to provide funding for anticipated re-leasing costs and capital expenditures for the Louis Rose Building and Boeing at the Atrium. Accordingly, no operating distributions were paid to limited partners during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. Future operating distributions to limited partners will be largely dependent upon the amount of cash generated from the Joint Ventures, our expectations of future cash flows, and determination of near-term cash needs for
tenant re-leasing costs and other capital improvements for properties owned by the Joint Ventures.

We believe that the cash on hand and distributions due
from the Joint Ventures are sufficient to cover our current working capital needs.

Long-Term Liquidity

We expect that our future sources of capital will be primarily derived from net proceeds generated from the selective and strategic sale of properties and operating cash
flows generated from the Joint Ventures. Our future long-term liquidity requirements will include, but not be limited to, funding tenant improvements, renovations, expansions, and other significant capital improvements necessary for properties owned
through the Joint Ventures. Specifically, we anticipate funding our proportionate share of anticipated capital improvements and re-leasing costs at the Louis Rose Building and Boeing at the Atrium. Future cash flows from operating activities will be
primarily affected by distributions received from the Joint Ventures, which are dependent upon the net operating income generated by the Joint Ventures properties, less reserves for known capital expenditures.

We have encountered difficulties in re-leasing the Louis Rose Building primarily due to the softening of the Charlotte office market and related Northeast submarket of
Charlotte during the period following the expiration of the sole tenants lease on April 30, 2001. The Northeast submarket of Charlotte continues to present challenges to landlords, primarily due to the availability of office
space for lease, and low rental rates and concessions offered to prospective tenants. As of September 30, 2007, the vacancy rate for the Northeast submarket of Charlotte is 21.8%, compared to the vacancy rate for Charlotte as a whole
of 11.6%. Accordingly, we are uncertain as to when the Louis Rose Building will be re-leased, the level of rental rates which may be achieved in connection with such re-leasing, or the amount of re-leasing costs we will be required to fund in
connection with the potential re-leasing of this property.

Capital Resources

The Partnership is an investment vehicle formed for the purpose of acquiring, owning, and operating income-producing real properties or investing in joint ventures formed for the same purpose, and has invested all of
the partners original net offering proceeds available for investment. Thus, it is unlikely that we will acquire interests in any additional properties or joint ventures. Historically, our investment strategy has generally involved acquiring
properties on an all-cash basis that are pre-leased to creditworthy tenants through joint ventures with affiliated partnerships.

The Joint Ventures incur
capital expenditures primarily in the form of building improvements for the purpose of maintaining the quality of our properties, and tenant improvements for the purpose of readying our properties for re-leasing. As leases expire, we will work with
the Joint Ventures to attempt to re-lease space to an existing tenant or market the space to prospective new tenants. Generally, tenant improvements funded in connection with lease renewals require less capital than those funded in connection with
new leases. However, external conditions, such as the supply of and demand for comparable space available within a given market, drive capital costs as well as rental rates. Any capital or other expenditures not provided for by the operations of the
Joint Ventures will be required to be funded by the Partnership and the respective joint venture partners on a pro-rata basis.



Page 18



---

##### Table of Contents

Our cash management policy typically includes first utilizing current period operating cash flow until depleted, at which
point operating reserves are utilized to fund capital and other required expenditures. In the event that current and prior period accumulated operating cash flows are insufficient to fund such costs, net property sale proceeds reserves would then be
utilized.

As of September 30, 2007, we had received, used, distributed, and held net sale proceeds allocated to the Partnership from the sale of
properties as presented below:



|                                           |  |                   |  |                                       |        |                                              |           |                          |   |                                                                   |  |                                                                                                                           |  |   |           |  |   |          
|------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------- |  | ------------------------------------- | ------ | -------------------------------------------- | --------- | ------------------------ | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | --------- |  | - | ---------
|                                           |  | Net Sale Proceeds |  | Partnerships Approximate Ownership % |        | Net SaleProceeds Allocated tothe Partnership |           | Use of Net Sale Proceeds |   | Net Sale Proceeds Distributed toPartners as of September 30, 2007 |  | Undistributed
NetSale Proceeds BeingReserved as of September 30, 2007                                                    
|Property Sold                              |  |                   |  |                                       | Amount |                                              | Purpose   |                          |  
|Cherokee Commons(sold in 2001)             |  | $8,414,089        |  | 50.8%                                 |        | $                                            | 4,275,779 |                          | $ | 1,380,616                                                         |  |   Re-leasing of Boeing at the Atrium (2002 and 2003)    Funding for Fund I and Fund II Tucker
operating expenses (2005) |  | $ | 2,895,163 |  | $ | 0        
|                                           |  |                   |  |                                       |        |                                              |          
|Heritage Placeretail portion(sold in 2003) |  | $3,207,708        |  | 45.5%                                 |        |                                              | 1,460,790 |                          |   | 23,749                                                            |  |   Funding for Fund I and Fund II Tucker operating expenses (2005)                                                        |  |   | 1,437,041 |  |   | 0        
|                                           |  |                   |  |                                       |        |                                              |          
|Holcomb BridgeProperty(sold in 2004)       |  | $6,889,379        |  | 13.8%                                 |        |                                              | 952,801   |                          |   | 5,278                                                             |  |   Funding for Fund I and Fund II Tucker operating expenses (2005)                                                        |  |   | 684,568   |  |   | 262,955  
|                                           |  |                   |  |                                       |        |                                              |          
|Brookwood Grill(sold in 2004)              |  | $2,318,115        |  | 59.0%                                 |        |                                              | 1,368,616 |                          |   | 7,675                                                             |  |   Funding for Fund I and Fund II Tucker operating expenses (2005)                                                        |  |   | 983,228   |  |   | 377,713  
|                                           |  |                   |  |                                       |        |                                              |          
|Heritage Placeoffice portion(sold in 2006) |  | $4,028,043        |  | 45.5%                                 |        |                                              | 1,834,371 |                          |   | 0                                                                 |  |                                                                                                                           |  |   | 0         |  |   | 1,834,371
|                                           |  |                   |  |                                       |        |                                              |           |                          |   |                                                                   |  |                                                                                                                           |  |   |           |  |   |          
|Total                                      |  |                   |  |                                       |        | $                                            | 9,892,357 |                          | $ | 1,417,318                                                         |  |                                                                                                                           |  | $ | 6,000,000 |  | $ | 2,475,039
|                                           |  |                   |  |                                       |        |                                              |           |                          |   |                                                                   |  |                                                                                                                           |  |   |           |  |   |          

The net proceeds listed above will continue to be held in reserve by Fund II and Fund II-OW as our General
Partners evaluate the capital needs of the existing properties in which we hold an interest.



Results of Operations

Equity in loss of Fund II and Fund II-OW was $74,758 and $21,450 for the three months ended September 30, 2007
and 2006, respectively. The increase in loss is primarily attributable to (i) repairs and maintenance costs incurred at the Louis Rose Building, (ii) an increase in administrative expenses, printing costs, and accounting fees,
substantially all of which resulted from reporting and regulatory requirements, (iii) a decline in interest income due to a decrease in the average net proceeds held during the respective periods as a result of the November 2006 distribution,
partially offset by (iv) lease termination income earned by Fund II-III Associates resulting from Boeings early lease termination.



Page 19



---

##### Table of Contents

Equity in loss of Fund II and Fund II-OW was $227,010 and $459,977 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006, respectively. The decrease in loss is primarily attributable to (i) an impairment loss recognized by Fund I and Fund II Tucker in the first quarter of 2006, (ii) lease termination income earned by Fund II-III Associates resulting
from Boeings early lease termination in the third quarter of 2007, (iii) a decline in legal fees, partially offset by (iv) repair and maintenance costs incurred at the Louis Rose Building, (v) an increase in administrative costs
and accounting fees, substantially all of which resulted from reporting and regulatory requirements, and (vi) a decline in interest income due to a decrease in the average net proceeds held during the respective periods as a result of the
November 2006 distribution. Absent leasing activity at the Louis Rose Building or Boeing at the Atrium, we expect additional equity in loss of Fund II and Fund II-OW in the future due to incurring additional administrative expenses, as a result of
complying with additional reporting and regulatory requirements, and a decrease in interest income as a result of distributing net sales proceeds in November 2006.

Inflation

We are exposed to inflation risk, as income from long-term leases is the primary source of our cash flows from operations. There
are provisions in the majority of our tenant leases that would protect us from the impact of inflation. These provisions include rent steps, reimbursement billings for operating expense pass-through charges, real estate tax, and insurance
reimbursements on a per-square-foot basis or, in some cases, annual reimbursement of operating expenses above a certain per-square-foot allowance. However, due to the long-term nature of our leases, the leases may not readjust their reimbursement
rates frequently enough to cover inflation.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

Summary

Our accounting policies have been established to conform with
GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If managements judgment or interpretation of the facts
and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, thus resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies
may utilize different estimates that may impact comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

Below is a
discussion of the accounting policies used by the Partnership and the Joint Ventures, which are considered to be critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently
uncertain.

Investment in Real Estate Assets

We will
be required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of our depreciable assets. We will consider the period of future benefit of the assets to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income.
The estimated useful lives of the Joint Ventures assets by class are as follows:



|                      |  |                                       
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Buildings             |  | 40 years                              
|Building improvements |  | 5-25 years                            
|Land improvements     |  | 20 years                              
|Tenant improvements   |  | Shorter of lease term or economic life

In the event that the Joint Ventures utilize inappropriate useful lives or methods of depreciation, our net income
would be misstated.



Page 20



---

##### Table of Contents

Valuation of Real Estate Assets

We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets in which we have an ownership interest through investments in the Joint Ventures may
not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present which indicate that the carrying amounts of real estate assets may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether
the carrying value of the real estate assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do
not exceed the carrying value, management adjusts the real estate assets to the fair value, as defined by SFAS No. 144, and recognizes an impairment loss. Estimated fair values are calculated based on the following information, dependent upon
availability, in order of preference: (i) recently quoted market prices, (ii) market prices for comparable properties, or (iii) the present value of undiscounted cash flows, including estimated salvage value. In the first quarter of
2006, Fund I and Fund II Tucker recorded an impairment loss for the office component of Heritage Place of approximately $795,000, of which approximately $362,000 was allocated to the Partnership, in order to reduce the carrying value of the property
to its fair value, less costs to sell, as a result of a change in managements intended holding period for this asset.

Projections of expected future
cash flows require management to estimate future market rental income amounts subsequent to the expiration of current lease agreements, property operating expenses, discount rates, the number of months it takes to re-lease the property, and the
number of years the property is held for investment. The use of inappropriate assumptions in the future cash flow analysis would result in an incorrect assessment of the propertys future cash flows and fair value, and could result in the
overstatement of the carrying value of real estate assets held by the Joint Ventures and net income of the Partnership.

Related-Party Transactions

We have entered into agreements with Wells Capital; Wells Management, an affiliate of our General Partners; and their affiliates, whereby we pay certain
fees and expense reimbursements to Wells Capital, Wells Management, and their affiliates for asset management; the management and leasing of our properties; administrative services relating to accounting, property management, and other partnership
administration, and incur the related expenses. See Note 4 to our financial statements included in this report for a description of the fees and expense reimbursements we have incurred.



|ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|------- | ----------------------------------------------------------

Since
we do not borrow any money, make any foreign investments, or invest in any market risk-sensitive instruments, we are not subject to risks relating to interest rates, foreign current exchange rate fluctuations, or the other market risks contemplated
by Item 305 of Regulation S-K.



|ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|------- | -----------------------



We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management of Wells Capital, our corporate general partner, including the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial
Officer of Wells Capital, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures as defined in rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of Wells Capital concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report in providing a reasonable level of assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods
specified in applicable SEC rules and forms,



Page 21



---

##### Table of Contents

including providing a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of Wells Capital, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2007 that have materially affected, or are likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.



|PART II. | OTHER INFORMATION
|-------- | -----------------



|ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|------- | -----------------

We are from time to time a party to legal
proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any litigation the outcome of which would, in managements judgment based on information currently available, have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations or financial condition, nor is management aware of any such litigation threatened against us during the quarter ended September 30, 2007, requiring disclosure under Item 103 of Regulation S-K.



|ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS
|-------- | ------------

There have been no material changes from the risk
factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|------- | -----------------------------------------------------------



|(a) | We did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 during the quarter ended September 30, 2007.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | Not applicable.
|--- | ---------------



|(c) | We did not redeem any securities during the quarter ended September 30, 2007.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



|ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|------- | -------------------------------



|(a) | We were not subject to any indebtedness and, therefore, did not default with respect to any indebtedness during the quarter ended September 30, 2007.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | Not applicable.
|--- | ---------------



|ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|------- | ---------------------------------------------------

No matters were submitted to a vote of our limited partners during the quarter ended September 30, 2007.





|ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION
|------- | -----------------



|(a) | During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, there was no information required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K which was not disclosed in a report on Form 8-K.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | Not applicable.
|--- | ---------------



|ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS
|------- | --------

The Exhibits to this
report are set forth on Exhibit Index to Third Quarter Form 10-Q attached hereto.



Page 22



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



|                 |  |  |  |                                                                                                   |  |                            
|---------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                 |  |  |  | WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II (Registrant)                                                           
|                 |  |  | 
|                 |  |  |  | By:                                                                                               |  | WELLS CAPITAL, INC.        
|                 |  |  |  |                                                                                                   |  | (Corporate General Partner)
|                 |  | 
|November 8, 2007 |  |  |  | /S/    LEO F. WELLS,
III                                                                         
|                 |  |  |  | Leo F. Wells, III President, Principal
Executive Officer,and Sole Director of Wells Capital, Inc.
|                 |  | 
|November 8, 2007 |  |  |  | /S/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMS                                                                       
|                 |  |  |  | Douglas P. Williams Principal Financial
Officer of Wells Capital, Inc.                           



Page 23



---

##### Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

TO THIRD QUARTER FORM 10-Q

OF

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND II



|            |  |                                                                                                                               
|----------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit No. |  | Description                                                                                                                   
|            | 
|31.1        |  | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                        
|            | 
|31.2        |  | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                        
|            | 
|32.1        |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002