alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT A1

PARTY APPEARANCE SHEET

Name 

Law Firm 

Email 

Phone Number 

Docket Entry No. of 

Notice of Appearance 

Notice of Appearance 

ADDITIONAL

ATTORNEY

Complete the below 

information for each 

attorney appearing for 

observation purposes. 

Name 

x CourtSolutions

Listen Only

x In Person – NY

x In Person – PR

Law Firm 

Email 

Phone Number 

1 This Party Appearance Sheet must be attached to a party in interest’s Informative Motion as 

Exhibit A.

Attorneys who wish to view but not participate in the hearing may gain admittance to the San Juan 

Courtroom or New York Courtroom, on a first-come first-served basis. All attorneys who wish to 

observe in person must be listed on this appearance sheet.

Name of Party 

ATTORNEY 1 Appearance Method In Person NY

ATTORNEY 2 Appearance Method In Person NY

Law Firm 

Email 

Phone Number 

Docket Entry No. of 

CarolinaVelaz-Rivero

cvelaz@mpmlawpr.com 

Marini Pietrantoni MuÒiz, LLC

(787) 705-2171

NOA - Docket No. 2683

Appearing 

Luis C. Marini-Biaggi

lmarini@mpmlawpr.com 

Marini Pietrantoni MuÒiz,

230503 EXHIBIT A. APPEARANCE SHEET VERSION MAY 3, 2023

LLC

(787) 705-2171

NOA - Docket No. 2682

Appearing in Person, PR

in Person, PR

Peter Friedman

O'Melveny & Myers LLP

pfriedman@omm.com

(202) 383-5300

PHV Admission - Docket No. 153

Maria DiConza

mdiconza@omm.com

O'Melveny & Myers LLP

(212) 326-2144

PHV Admission - Docket No. 16488

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24134-1 Filed:05/04/23 Entered:05/04/23 14:29:20 Desc:

Exhibit A - Party Appearance Sheet Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Cardinal FinancialCorporation and subsidiaries:

We consent to the incorporation by reference inregistration statement no. 333-106694 on Form S-8 dated July 1, 2003,registration statement No. 333-111672 on Form S-8 dated December 31, 2003, andregistration statement No. 333-111673 on Form S-8 dated December 31, 2003 ofCardinal Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) of our reportsdated March 11, 2005, with respect to the consolidated statements of conditionof the Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2004, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, whichreports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10 K of theCompany.

Our report dated March 11, 2005, on management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2004, expresses our opinion that the Company did not maintain effectiveinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 becauseof the effect of a material weakness on the achievement of the objectives ofthe control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states that asof December 31, 2004, the Company’s accounting personnel lacked sufficientresources and expertise to properly account for certain non-routinetransactions; the Company’s policies and procedures did not provide for timelyreview of significant non-routine transactions and related accounting entries;and the Company did not maintain sufficient documentation related to theapplication of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to significantnon-routine transactions.

The aforementioned reportdated March 11, 2005, on management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, contains anexplanatory paragraph that states that the Company acquired George MasonMortgage, LLC (GMM) during 2004, and management excluded from its assessment ofthe effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting asof December 31, 2004, GMM’s internal control over financial reportingassociated with total assets of $392.2 million and pre-tax income of $2.1million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as ofand for the year ended December 31, 2004.Our audit of internal control overfinancial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internalcontrol over financial reporting of George Mason Mortgage, LLC.
| /s/ KPMG LLP        |   |   |
|---------------------|--------|--------|
| McLean, Virginia    |
| March 11, 2005 |

 

----
EXHIBIT
32



CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In
connection with the Annual Report of Cala Corporation. on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") Joseph
Cala, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that to his
knowledge:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.



Date:
 January 12, 2011                     By: /s/ Joseph Cala

Joseph
Cala

Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer



This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
§ 121.119 Weather reporting facilities. ( a ) No certificate holder conducting supplemental operations may use any weather report to control flight unless it was prepared and released by the U.S. National Weather Service or a source approved by the Weather Bureau. For operations outside the U.S., or at U.S. Military airports, where those reports are not available, the certificate holder must show that its weather reports are prepared by a source found satisfactory by the Administrator.
( b ) Each certificate holder conducting supplemental operations that uses forecasts to control flight movements shall use forecasts prepared from weather reports specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19195, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-76, 36 FR 13911, July 28, 1971; Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2611, Jan. 26, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000             MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-2000             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000             AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                         158,775                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  202,472                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,500                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    715,257                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,076,108                       0
<PP&E>                                          39,909                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,607                   2,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,166,415                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          311,461                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     2,383,385                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,528,431)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,166,415                       0
<SALES>                                        426,757                 323,675
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               426,757                 323,675
<CGS>                                          270,266                 233,939
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  270,266                 233,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               181,015                 180,624
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,500                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,924)                (87,806)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,924)                (87,806)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,924)                (87,806)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)                  (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)                  (0.06)


</TABLE>
### 11 th 

### Court of Appeals Mandate

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS

T O T HE 29 TH D ISTRICT C OURT O F P ALO P INTO C OUNTY

, G REETINGS :

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, on February 8, 2018,

the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Terry McCain et ux, Barbara McCain

11th Court of Appeals No. 11-17-00213-CV and

29th District Court Case No. C46601

Reeder Distributors, Inc. and Gary Reeder

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“ 

### This court has considered Appellants’ motion to dismiss this appeal and

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this

appeal are taxed against Terry McCain et ux, Barbara McCain. "

WHEREFORE WE COMMAND YOU To observe the order of our said Court of

Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

W ITNESS

, the H ON

. J OHN M. B AILEY

, Justice of this said Court, with the seal

thereof annexed at the City of Eastland,

on March 2, 2018.

S HERRY W ILLIAMSON

, C LERK

By: Cheryl Busk, DeputyBILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, ELEVENTH DISTRICT, AT EASTLAND

No. 11-17-00213-CV

Terry McCain et ux, Barbara McCain

v.

Reeder Distributors, Inc. and Gary Reeder

(No. C46601 IN 29TH DISTRICT COURT OF PALO PINTO COUNTY)

COURTS OF APPEAL:

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/NOT

PAID DATE BY

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

FILING $10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$205.00 E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID 02/05/2018

12/29/2017

11/27/2017

10/25/2017

08/28/2017 CORA L MOORE

CORA L MOORE

CORA L MOORE

CORA L MOORE

CORA L MOORE

TRIAL COURT FEE:

Clerk’s Record

- unknown

Balance of costs owing to the Eleventh Court of Appeals, Eastland, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, Sherry Williamson, CLERK OF THE ELEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of

the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same

appears of record in this office.

W ITNESS

, the H ON

. J OHN M. B AILEY

, Justice of this said Court, with the seal

thereof annexed at the City of Eastland,

on March 2, 2018.

S HERRY W ILLIAMSON

, C LERK

By: Cheryl Busk, Deputy
Exhibit 32 (ii)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006, I, J. Robert Buchanan, Treasurer (Principal
Financial Officer) of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

        (2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.



/s/ J. ROBERT BUCHANAN
-----------------------
J. Robert Buchanan
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Attachment 20Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:24634-20   Filed:06/22/23   Entered:06/22/23 18:57:29    Desc: 

Attachment 20   Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Form 10-K") of
Cardinal Financial Corporation, I, Bernard H. Clineburg, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a)   the
Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)   the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

|Date: March 17, 2008 |  | /s/BERNARD H. CLINEBURGBernard H. Clineburg Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
(LOGO)

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

1300 Huntington Building
925 Euclid Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44115-1405

Phone: 216 861 5000

Report on Management's  Assertion on Compliance with Minimum Servicing Standards
Set Forth in the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

Report of Independent Accountants

Board of Directors
National City Mortgage Co.

We have examined  management's  assertion,  included in the accompanying  report
titled Report of Management, that National City Mortgage Co. (NCM) complied with
the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) during
the year ended December 31, 1998. Management is responsible for NCM's compliance
with  those  requirements.  Our  responsibility  is to  express  an  opinion  on
management's assertions about NCM's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on  a  test  basis,  evidence  about  NCM's  compliance  with  those
requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered  necessary in
the circumstances.  We believe that our examination  provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on NCM's
compliance with specified requirements.

In  our  opinion,   management's   assertion,   that  NCM   complied   with  the
aforementioned  requirements  during the year ended December 31, 1998, is fairly
stated, in all material respects.

Ernst &Young LLP

January 29, 1999

Ernst &Young LLP is a member of Ernst &Young International, Ltd.
#### § 1262.305 Settlement.

The applicant and agency counsel may agree on a proposed settlement of the award before final action on the application, either in connection with a settlement of the underlying proceeding, or after the underlying proceeding has been concluded. If a prevailing party and agency counsel agree on a proposed settlement of an award before an application has been filed, the application shall be filed with the proposed settlement.
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Ron Howell certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of HST Global, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2015;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: August 14, 2015By:\s\ Ron HowellRon HowellChief Executive Officer
#### Wauchula Land & Investment Company, a Corporation, *Appellant,*v. Walter A. Seigfried and Samuel H. Parsons and Dunham Manufacturing Company, a Corporation, *Appellees.*

Decision Filed January 23, 1923.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardee County; George W. Whitehurst, Judge.

*Wilbur*W. *Whitehurst,*for Appellant;

*Treadwell*& *Treadwell,*for Appellees.

*72Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed,

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne, and West, J. J., ocncur.
Exhibit 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     In connection with the Report of HST Global, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wesley D. Tate, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                        Date: August 14, 2009

                                        \s\ Wesley D. Tate
                                        ------------------
                                        Wesley D. Tate
                                        Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1221.202 Description of the medal.

The description of the Congressional Space Medal of Honor, which was designed by the Institute of Heraldry, U.S. Army, is set forth in appendix A to this subpart. Each person awarded the Medal also shall receive a citation describing the basis for the award.