alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Tee
15;
N.

BULLETIN 1042 PLATE 17

stort 5x0,
1qgao00y%snn

8

15 R
RITE ele 16 €

23)

LL

WASHINGTON _

_OKMULGEE

iy

PITTSBURG
.

‘

tao x
&
: s
S; 3
| E Z :
S| di
als : ae
s|e z E
BA i 5
ie 3
Pe
1 z
yn de| £
aenlen
ce) 6 Miles
L i 1 J 0 5 Miles
ae Sa a a
cL | : a - |
A. HENRYETTA, MORRIS, AND ERAM COAL BEDS B. MCALESTER COAL BED C. DAWSON AND CROWEBURG (BROKEN ARROW) COAL BEDS

EXPLANATION

MEASURED AND INDICATED
RESERVES: INFERRED RESERVES

Coal more than 42 inches thick Coal more than 42 inches thick

Coal 28 to 42 inches thick Coal 28 to 42 inches thick

Coal 14 to 28 inches thick Coal 14 to 28 inches thick

Coal either less than 14 inches thick, under
‘more than 3000 feet of overburden, ren-
dered unminable, or data insufficient to
estimate reserves

Mined-out area

fo Am. l -—
Yel : Fault

2000:
Thickness of overburden, in feet

Limit of coal assumed to be
more than 28 inches thick

Boundary of area considered to
contain coal reserves

Line separ 'e area (on north side) where
the Lower and Upper Hartshorne coal beds are
considered as one bed, and the area (on

20 Miles 3 south side) where they are considered nari

J rately. The Upper Hartshorne bed in the lat-
ter area is not represented on these maps.

Lines separating areas of coal of low-, medium-,
and high-volatile bituminous rank

D. LOWER HARTSHORNE COAL BED, INCLUDING THE UPPER HARTSHORNE COAL BED WHERE THE TWO ARE VERY CLOSE TOGETHER ara ose eee

GENERALIZED MAPS OF IMPORTANT COAL BEDS IN OKLAHOMA
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 00-34]

# AGENCY:

Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 00-34 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: April 24, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 24931)          ( print page 24932)          ( print page 24933)          ( print page 24934)    

BILLING CODE 5001-10-C

[FR Doc. 00-10576  Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
Exhibit 32.1

                           Section 1350 Certification
                           --------------------------

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q/A  Amendment  No.1 (the
"Report") of PREMIER  EXHIBITIONS,  INC. (the  "Company")  for the quarter ended
November 30, 2005, Arnie Geller, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies, that:



(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: July 31, 2006             /s/ Arnie Geller
                                 ----------------
                                 Arnie Geller
                                 President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: July 31, 2006             /s/ Stephen Couture
                                 ----------------
                                 Stephen Couture
                                 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
§ 120.215 Covered employees. ( a ) Each employee, including any assistant, helper, or individual in a training status, who performs a safety-sensitive function listed in this section directly or by contract (including by subcontract at any tier) for an employer as defined in this subpart must be subject to alcohol testing under an alcohol testing program implemented in accordance with this subpart. This includes full-time, part-time, temporary, and intermittent employees regardless of the degree of supervision. The safety-sensitive functions are: ( 1 ) Flight crewmember duties.
( 2 ) Flight attendant duties.
( 3 ) Flight instruction duties.
( 4 ) Aircraft dispatcher duties.
( 5 ) Aircraft maintenance or preventive maintenance duties.
( 6 ) Ground security coordinator duties.
( 7 ) Aviation screening duties.
( 8 ) Air traffic control duties.
( 9 ) Operations control specialist duties.
( b ) Each employer must identify any employee who is subject to the alcohol testing regulations of more than one DOT agency. Prior to conducting any alcohol test on a covered employee subject to the alcohol testing regulations of more than one DOT agency, the employer must determine which DOT agency authorizes or requires the test.
[Doc. No. FAA-2008-0937, 74 FR 22653, May 14, 2009, as amended by Amdt. 120-2, 79 FR 9973, Feb. 21, 2014]
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Icagen, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Richard D. Katz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                              
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 6, 2007 |  | /s/ Richard D. Katz                          
|                     |  | Richard D. Katz, M.D. Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Ron Howell, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of HST Global, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended M June 30, 2014;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: August 14, 2014By:\s\ Ron HowellRon HowellInterim Chief Financial Officer
§ 121.318 Public address system. No person may operate an airplane with a seating capacity of more than 19 passengers unless it is equipped with a public address system which— ( a ) Is capable of operation independent of the crewmember interphone system required by § 121.319, except for handsets, headsets, microphones, selector switches, and signaling devices;
( b ) Is approved in accordance with § 21.305 of this chapter;
( c ) Is accessible for immediate use from each of two flight crewmember stations in the pilot compartment;
( d ) For each required floor-level passenger emergency exit which has an adjacent flight attendant seat, has a microphone which is readily accessible to the seated flight attendant, except that one microphone may serve more than one exit, provided the proximity of the exits allows unassisted verbal communication between seated flight attendants;
( e ) Is capable of operation within 10 seconds by a flight attendant at each of those stations in the passenger compartment from which its use is accessible;
( f ) Is audible at all passenger seats, lavatories, and flight attendant seats and work stations; and
( g ) For transport category airplanes manufactured on or after November 27, 1990, meets the requirements of § 25.1423 of this chapter.
[Doc. No. 24995, 54 FR 43926, Oct. 27, 1989]
#### Henry Williams, Appellant, v. Smith & Richardson, Appellees.

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Geo. U. Walker & Son and Carter & McCollum, for Appellant.

Powell & Pelot, for Appellees.

Appeal dismissed on motion of counsel for appellant on February 18th, 1913.
# Official Journal C 445/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 445 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6322 December 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 445

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6322 December 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2020/C 445/01 | Council Decision of 18 December 2020 appointing the Chairperson of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board | 1 |
| 2020/C 445/02 | Council Decision of 18 December 2020 appointing two members of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board | 3 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2020/C 445/01

Council Decision of 18 December 2020 appointing the Chairperson of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board

1

2020/C 445/02

Council Decision of 18 December 2020 appointing two members of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSHUS TROY PORTER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 70 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
**Exhibit 32.2****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**     I, Juliet M. Reising, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of VersoTechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended June 30,2006 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and  2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:October 6, 2006         /s/ Juliet M. Reising   Juliet M. Reising,   Executive Vice President and
**EXHIBIT    10.2**

**RECITALS**

*Consolidated Operating Income to Consolidated Fixed      Charges.*

**STANLEY        FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.        [SEAL]**

|  By:         |  /s/ Douglas I.                Payne         |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:  |  Douglas I. Payne                                                                    |
|  Title:      |  Vice President -  Finance and                Administration                    |

**WACHOVIA        BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION       [SEAL]**

|  By:      |  /s/ Jonathan R. Richardson |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|  Name:                             |  Jonathan R. Richardson     |
|  Title:                            |  Vice President             |

----
#### PIKE *v.*WHITE’S ADMINISTRATOR.

Motion for nonsuit — refusal of, no error — slight evidence — evidence.

Motion'for nonsuit is addressed to the discretion of the court, and should not prevail if there be any evidchce tending to prove the issue, if refused, even improperly, no writ of cnor lies, the party goes to the jury.

If the plaintiff’s claim «be for work done, if there is no proof the work was done, but only of a promise to pay if done, the court should instruct the jury for the defendant, and if they refuse, it is error.

Error to the Common Pleas. White’s administrators sued Pike in the court below on the following contract:

*759‘Mr. James S. White, '

Sir — I will be accountable to you for $100, for or towards the repair of the coach of Messrs. Fowler & Root.

Jarvis Pike.’

At the trial upon the general issue, the plaintiff read the letter in evidence and rested. The defendant moved for a nonsuit, because no evidence was given of a legal liability to pay. The motion was overruled. The parties submitted to the jury without other evidence. The defendant asking the court to instruct the jury, that unless they had evidence that the coach was repaired, the plaintiff could not recover. The court refused the instruction, which was excepted to, and a verdict and judgment taken for the plaintiff.

O. *Parish*and *Swayne,*for the plaintiff in error,

insisted, the court erred, both in refusing the nonsuit and the instruction to the jury-

*G. Swan,*contra,

cited 29 *O. L.*218; 2 *John. Ca.*52; 3 *Mason jR.*44.

Wood, J.

The Common Pleas were right in overruling the non-suit. The evidence tended to prove the issue. But no writ of error lies to such refusal, if we should have ordered differently — ■ the motion is addressed to the discretion of the court, and if refused, the applicant goes to the jury, not to the court of errors. But in refusing to instruct the jury, that without they were satisfied by proof the work was done, they should not find for the plaintiff, to make the defendant pay for it, the court erred, and for that error we reverse the judgment.
§ 1204.1508 Time limitations for receiving comments on proposed direct Federal development. ( a ) Except in unusual circumstances, the Administrator gives state processes or state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities at least 60 days from the date established by the Administrator to comment on proposed direct Federal development.
( b ) This section also applies to comments in cases in which the review, coordination, and communication with the Agency has been delegated.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MPH TECHNOLOGIES OY,

Appellant

v.

APPLE INC.,

Appellee

______________________

2024-1294

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-

00820.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Apple Inc. moves unopposed to dismiss MPH Technologies OY’s appeal and requests that each party bear its own 

costs upon the dismissal.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

Case: 24-1294 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 03/27/2024
2 MPH TECHNOLOGIES OY v. APPLE INC.

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.

March 27, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

 

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 27, 2024

Case: 24-1294 Document: 16 Page: 2 Filed: 03/27/2024
<PAGE>


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the use in the Statement of Additional Information
constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (the "Registration
Statement") of our reports relating to the financial statements of the following
funds established under the Declaration of Trust of the State Street Bank and
Trust Company Investment Funds for Tax Exempt Retirement Plans: Lifecycle Fund
Group Trust - Conservative (report dated March 21, 2003), Lifecycle Fund Group
Trust - Moderate (report dated March 21, 2003), S&P 500 Flagship Fund and S&P
500 Flagship Non-Lending Fund (Combined Financial Statements) (report dated
February 14, 2003), Russell 2000 Index Securities Lending Fund and Russell 2000
Index Fund (Combined Financial Statements) (report dated February 14, 2003),
Daily EAFE Fund (report dated February 21, 2003), Government Corporate Bond Fund
(report dated March 21, 2003), Daily MSCI Europe Index Securities Lending Fund
and Daily MSCI Europe Index Fund (Combined Financial Statements) (report dated
February 21, 2003), Daily MSCI Japan Index Securities Lending Fund and Daily
MSCI Japan Index Fund (Combined Financial Statements) (report dated February 21,
2003), Daily MSCI Pacific Basin ex-Japan Index Securities Lending Fund and Daily
MSCI Pacific Basin ex-Japan Index Fund (Combined Financial Statements) (report
dated February 21, 2003), Government Fund (report dated March 21, 2003), Long
Corporate Index Securities Lending Fund and Long Corporate Index Fund (Combined
Financial Statements) (report dated February 21, 2003), Intermediate Corporate
Index Securities Lending Fund and Intermediate Corporate Index Fund (Combined
Financial Statements) (report dated February 21, 2003), Passive 1-3 Year Credit
Index Fund (report dated February 21, 2003), Limited Duration Bond Fund (report
dated March 21, 2003), Corporate Fund (report dated March 7, 2003) and Short
Term Investment Fund (report dated February 14, 2003) for the year ended
December 31, 2002. We also consent to the references to us under the headings
"Condensed Financial Information" and "About Our Independent Accountants" in
such Registration Statement.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------------
Boston, Massachusetts
April 23, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,972
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     17,326
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,851
<PP&E>                                          27,649
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,120
<BONDS>                                         16,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           155
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   117,034
<SALES>                                         62,487
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,487
<CGS>                                           44,689
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,627<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,285
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,099
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,799
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,799
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
<FN>
<F1>GOODWILL AMORTIZATION - 1,427, PLANT CONSOLIDATION 1,200
</FN>
        

</TABLE>