alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3723

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 8135 Forest Lane in Dallas, Texas, as the 

‘‘Vaughn Gross Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3723 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 8135 Forest Lane in Dallas, Texas, shall be 

4 known and designated as the ‘‘Vaughn Gross Post Office 

5 Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Vaughn Gross Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 29, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Form 10-K of Aksys, Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year endedDecember 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence D. Damron, Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13 (a) or Section 15 (d) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  March 16, 2005 | By:    | /s/ Lawrence D. Damron     |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|                             |   |                       |
|                             |   | Lawrence D. Damron         |
|                             |   | Senior Vice President  and |
|                             |   | Chief Financial Officer    |

 

 

Thiscertification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided toAksys, Ltd. and will be retained by Aksys, Ltd. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
|     |   | At      |   |
|----------|--------|---------|--------|
|     |   | 3/31/08 | (a)    |   | 12/31/07 |   |   | 3/31/07 |   |
|     |   |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Managed  |   | 1.36    | %      |   |   | 1.21 | % |   |   | 1.26 | % |   |
| Off-book |   | 0.77    |   |   |   | 0.71 |   |   |   | 0.69 |   |   |
| On-book  |   | 1.49    |   |   |   | 1.33 |   |   |   | 1.41 |   |   |

|     |   | At      |   |
|----------|--------|---------|--------|
|     |   | 3/31/08 | (a)    |   | 12/31/07 |   |   | 3/31/07 |   |
|     |   |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Managed  |   | 5.64    | %      |   |   | 5.36 | % |   |   | 5.22 | % |   |
| U.S.     |   | 5.75    |   |   |   | 5.52 |   |   |   | 4.72 |   |   |
| Non-U.S. |   | 5.61    |   |   |   | 5.30 |   |   |   | 5.40 |   |   |
| Off-book |   | 6.90    |   |   |   | 6.59 |   |   |   | 5.05 |   |   |
| U.S.     |   | 6.96    |   |   |   | 6.64 |   |   |   | 5.05 |   |   |
| Non-U.S. |   | (b)     |   |   |   | (b) |   |   |   | (b) |   |   |
| On-book  |   | 5.48    |   |   |   | 5.20 |   |   |   | 5.24 |   |   |
| U.S.     |   | 4.84    |   |   |   | 4.78 |   |   |   | 4.49 |   |   |
| Non-U.S. |   | 5.61    |   |   |   | 5.31 |   |   |   | 5.40 |   |   |
|     |   |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

| (a) | Subject      to update. |
|-----|-------------------------|
| (b) | Not      meaningful.    |
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-166-CV

CLINICAL CARE PHARMACY, L.L.C.	APPELLANTS

AND ANJANETTE WYATT

	V.

AMERISOURCEBERGER CORPORATION	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM THE 367TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

	Appellants Clinical Care Pharmacy, L.L.C. and Anjanette Wyatt are attempting to appeal the trial court’s default judgment in favor of appellee Amerisourceberger Corporation.  Because appellants’ notice of appeal was untimely filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

	The trial court’s default judgment was signed January 24, 2006.  Appellants filed a motion for new trial in the trial court on February 27, 2006—four days after the deadline for filing a motion for new trial.  See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(a) (providing that a motion for new trial shall be filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed).  The record does not reveal whether this motion for new trial was timely under the mailbox rule.  See Tex. R. Civ. P. 5 (providing that a document properly mailed on or before the last day for filing is timely if received by the clerk within ten days).  Regardless, appellants did not file their notice of appeal until May 11, 2006, which appears untimely under any calculation of the appellate deadline.2

	Because appellants’ notice of appeal appeared untimely, we notified them on May 25, 2006, of our concern that this court may not have jurisdiction over the appeal and informed them that unless they or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court a response showing a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal, this appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 26.3(b), 42.3(a).  We have received no response.

	The times for filing a notice of appeal are jurisdictional in this court, and absent a timely filed notice of appeal or an extension request, we must dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b), 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997).  Because appellants’ notice of appeal was not timely  filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D: MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

DELIVERED: July 13, 2006
# AGENCY:

 Geological Survey, Interior.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

 Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, the EOS Land Processes DAAC will host a meeting of its Science Advisory Panel at the U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center near Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The Panel, comprised of scientists from academic and government institutions, will provide the management of the DAAC with advice and consultation on a broad range of scientific and technical topics relevant to the development and operation of DAAC systems and capabilities.

Topics to be reviewed and discussed by the Panel include: DAAC status reports on FY 1999 activities and plans for FY 2000 activities; Panel review of and recommendations on FY 2000 proposed activities; review of Landsat 7 and Terra mission status; discussions leading to recommendations on the DAAC's Operations, Engineering, Science, and User Services support programs; support Science and Instrument Team data product Quality Assurance activities; and plans to support EOS Land Product Validation efforts.

# DATES:

 February 1-3, 2000, commencing at 8:30 am on February 1 and adjourning at 12:00 pm on February 3.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Mr. John Dwyer, EDC DAAC Project Scientist, EROS Data Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57198 at (605) 594-6060.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Meetings of the EDC DAAC Science Advisory Panel are open to the public.

Dated: January 10, 2000.

Richard E. Witmer,

Chief Geographer.

[FR Doc. 00-1023 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-Y7-M
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3740

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

223 South Main Street in Roxboro, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Oscar 

Scott Woody Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2004

Mr. MILLER of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. BALLANCE, Mr. ETHERIDGE, 

Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr. BURR, 

Mr. COBLE, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. HAYES, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. BALLENGER, 

Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, and Mr. WATT) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 223 South Main Street in Roxboro, North 

Carolina, as the ‘‘Oscar Scott Woody Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OSCAR SCOTT WOODY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 223 South Main Street in 

6 Roxboro, North Carolina, shall be known and designated 

7 as the ‘‘Oscar Scott Woody Post Office Building’’. 
2

•HR 3740 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Oscar Scott Woody 

5 Post Office Building.

Æ
§ 400.101 Cross-reference to employee financial disclosure and ethical conduct standards regulations. Employees of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Bank) should refer to: ( a ) The executive branch-wide financial disclosure regulations at 5 CFR part 2634;
( b ) The executive branch-wide Standards of Ethical Conduct at 5 CFR part 2635; and
( c ) The Bank regulations at 5 CFR part 6201 which supplement the executive branch-wide standards.
Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on form 10-Q for the period ended March 29, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
R. Scheffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1). The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2). The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


Date:  April 16, 2003                       By: /s/ Jeffrey R. Scheffer
                                                -----------------------
                                                Jeffrey R. Scheffer
                                                Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer


This  certification is provided  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, and accompanies the
annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2005 of Emerging Gamma
Corporation (the "Company").

I, Allen F. Campbell, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify that to
the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-KSB fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
          or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information  contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated:  June 28, 2005

         By: /S/ ALLEN F. CAMPBELL
            -----------------------------
            Chief Executive Officer
            (Principal Executive Officer)


Subscribed and sworn to before me this 28Th day of June 2005.


 /S/ IRENE MARTINEZ
---------------------
Name:  Irene Martinez
Title: Notary Public


<PAGE>

                  Certification of Principal Accounting Officer


This  certification is provided  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, and accompanies the
annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2005 of Emerging Gamma
Corporation (the "Company").

I, Jerry W. Jarrell,  the Chief Financial Officer of Company certify that to the
best of my knowledge:

     (iii) the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (iv) the information  contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated:  June 28, 2005

         By: /S/ JERRY W. JARRELL
            ------------------------------
            Chief Financial Officer
            (Principal Accounting Officer)


Subscribed and sworn to before me this 28Th day of June 2005.


 /S/ IRENE MARTINEZ
---------------------
Name:  Irene Martinez
Title: Notary Public
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 15, 2019

No. 04-19-00150-CV

IN RE Andrea PEREZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On March 14, 2019, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also 

filed an emergency motion for stay of a writ of possession. After considering the petition, this 

court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of 

mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s emergency motion for a stay is 

DENIED AS MOOT. This court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on March 15, 2019.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of March, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018-CV-0246, styled Andrea Perez v. Santos Sparkmam, pending in the 

County Court At Law No 1, Guadalupe County, Texas.
#### BIGGERS *v.*NOLAND *et al.*

No. 9258.

November 16, 1932.

*William A. Thomas,*for plaintiff.

*Hewitt W. Chambers*and *George L. Bell,*for defendants.

Gilbert, J.

Biggers filed a proceeding in equity. The prayers included relief by way of injunction, some of which was in its nature mandatory. The petition alleged that the defendant was insolvent. The case was referred to an auditor, who found in favor of the plaintiff. The decree of the court followed the auditor’s report, but did not specifically grant all of the relief sought. The court assessed the fee of the auditor against the plaintiff and the surety on a bond which the court had required of the plaintiff, “to stand good for any judgment that may be rendered against him in the final adjudication of said cause.” “Other costs in the case were taxed against defendant primarily; but if not made out of him, *875tben to be taxed against and made out of the plaintiff.” There was no exception within the time allowed by law to the judgment rendered. At a subsequent term Biggers filed a motion to set aside the judgment. This motion alleged that the defendant, Noland, “is absolutely insolvent and nothing more than a mendicant upon the street, and therefore the ‘other costs’ referred to in” the order taxing the costs “are now taxed against petitioner.” The only error assigned is upon the judgment “overruling the motion . . to set aside and vacate the judgment of June 20th, 1932, [which taxed the costs against the petitioner, Biggers, and Band, surety on the bond] because the same was injurious and hurtful to him and to F. L. Band, his surety, and because the said order and judgment was contrary to law.”

In equity cases it is the province of the judge to determine upon whom the costs shall fall. Civil Code (1910), § 5423; *Fitzpatrick*v. *McGregor,*133 *Ga.*332 (4), 344 (65 S. E. 859, 25 L. R. A. (N. S.) 50); *Lowe*v. *Byrd,*148 *Ga.*388 (96 S. E. *1001); Lane*v. *Tarver,*153 *Ga.*570 (2), 585 (112 S. E. 452). The case of *Hamilton*v. *DuPre,*103 *Ga.*795 (30 S. E. 248), cited for plaintiff in error, on its facts, was an extreme case, showing an abuse of discretion. It was stated in *Lowe*v. *Byrd,*supra, and *Lane*v. *Tarver,*supra, that *Hamilton*v. *DuPre*is the only case in which the judgment of a lower court has ever been reversed for abuse of discretion in determining upon whom the payment of costs shall fall. Under the facts of this case it can not be said that an abuse of discretion is shown. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
§ 1204.1511 Coordination in interstate situations. ( a ) The Administrator is responsible for— ( 1 ) Identifying proposed direct Federal development that has an impact on interstate areas;
( 2 ) Notifying appropriate officials and entities in states which have adopted a process and which select the Agency's program or activity.
( 3 ) Making efforts to identify and notify the affected state, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities in those states that have not adopted a process under the Order or do not select the Agency's program or activity;
( 4 ) Responding pursuant to § 1204.1510 of this part if the Administrator receives a recommendation from a designated areawide agency transmitted by a single point of contact, in cases in which the review, coordination, and communication with the Agency have been delegated.
( b ) The Administrator uses the procedures in § 1204.1510 if a state process provides a state process recommendation to the Agency through a single point of contact.
# Official Journal C 87/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 87 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 627 March 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 87

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 627 March 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2019/C 87/01 | Corrigendum to Agreement between the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, regarding the protection of classified information exchanged in the interests of the European Union, signed in Brussels on 25 May 2011( OJ C 202, 8.7.2011 ) | 1 |

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2019/C 87/01

Corrigendum to Agreement between the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, regarding the protection of classified information exchanged in the interests of the European Union, signed in Brussels on 25 May 2011( OJ C 202, 8.7.2011 )

( OJ C 202, 8.7.2011 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

Corrigenda

| 7.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 87/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 87/1

---

Corrigendum to Agreement between the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, regarding the protection of classified information exchanged in the interests of the European Union, signed in Brussels on 25 May 2011

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 202 of 8 July 2011
  )

(2019/C 87/01)

On page 15, closing formula, date:

for:

‘Done at Brussels on the fourth day of May in the year two thousand and eleven’.

read:

‘Done at Brussels on the twenty-fifth day of May in the year two thousand and eleven’.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3746 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3746

To designate the community center at McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas, 
  as the ``Robert J. Dole Community Center'' in honor of World War II 
 veteran and former United States Representative and Senator Robert J. 
                                 Dole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2004

 Mr. Tiahrt (for himself, Mr. Ryun of Kansas, Mr. Moran of Kansas, and 
  Mr. Moore) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the community center at McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas, 
  as the ``Robert J. Dole Community Center'' in honor of World War II 
 veteran and former United States Representative and Senator Robert J. 
                                 Dole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF COMMUNITY CENTER, MCCONNELL AIR FORCE BASE, 
              KANSAS, IN HONOR OF ROBERT J. DOLE.

    The community center at McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas, known as 
``Emerald City'', shall be known and designated as the ``Robert J. Dole 
Community Center'' in honor of World War II veteran and former United 
States Representative and Senator Robert J. Dole. Any reference to that 
community center in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or 
other paper of the United States shall be considered to be a reference 
to the Robert J. Dole Community Center.
                                 <all>
```