alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Ralph C. Guild, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) (Intentionally omitted)

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:

a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ RALPH C. GUILD                               
|                      |  | Ralph C. Guild                                   
|                      |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adelphia Communications Corporation ("Adelphia") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William T. Schleyer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Adelphia, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Adelphia.

|Date: October 7, 2005 | /s/WILLIAM T. SCHLEYERWilliam T. Schleyer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
^Aa\/ ^ <3 ^ \^\il^\i, 

. 

i : ^ \r\\\ 

r;^^ cr 

jt..n i\,.. / 

1/7 r\ 

LJixn i 

DEPAKTMENT OF TRANSPOilTATION 

AND PUBLIC FACILITIES 

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER 

I 

SEAN PARNELL, GOVERNOR 

4111 AVIATION AVENUE 

PO Box 196900 

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6900 

PHONE: (907) 269-0730 

FAX: (907) 269-0489 

WEB: dotstate.ak.us 

June 25, 2010 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: DOT-OST 2008-0201 / 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

This letter is to express support for the continuation of the Essential Air Service (EAS) program 

in Alaska and the critical transportation connection it brings to our most remote communities. 

Due to the inaccessible location of these communities and the complete lack of any road system 

connection, this subsidized air service is the only form of scheduled transportation. The 

community of Rampart depends on scheduled air freight, passenger and mail service for basic 

necessities, routine medical and health services, and economic welfare. 

The State of Alaska continues to assert that the local residents are best positioned to comment on 

particular schedules or air carriers and therefore we leave those specific areas for the community 

response. 

I respectfully urge USDOT to support and continue the EAS service at Rampart. 

Sincerely, 

Marc Luik^^ 

Deputy Commissioner of Aviation 

cc: Leo von Scheben, Commissioner, DOT&PF
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

BULLETIN 1031

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PLATE 9
EXPLANATION
ws; Quartz diorite
IN Plagioclase gneiss
Calcareous gneiss
SCENERY
——j_Hornblendite
WS 956 ———
IN LAKE Indefinite contact ws 1514 WS 1353
i LAKE
NS Concealed contact
RMA
REX Lineament determined
NS __ from aerial photo-
graphs. Doshed
where inferred
SCENERY LAKE DAMSITE
(MILE 3.6) | Projection of surface
E trace of lineament
Scale : Depth of fracture
° 200 400 800 Feet not known
Contour interval 50 feet
Datum i seo level
jatum is mean sea leve! RUTH LAKE DAMSITE
Scale
° 100 400 800 Feet
Contour al 100 feet
Datum is mean sea level
D oD Enlargement of portion of a part of special topographic map, (U.S. Geol. Survey, 1952)|
1700 a, re 1700’
: +
rN +
Hoo! 8 “ 100°
+ :
+ : 1600° S '600'
1050" « + 1050" g
: + + + $
XN 8 :
1000" 8 see rueeae 2a 0s 1000° S
S ‘
g SWAN LAKE DAMSITE ff Nee i 1900! G G 1600)
5 1500 Lisoo! r
3 (MILE 28) FESS 5 Fai re + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
10. io, 400 Feet o * +f t
202 | 900" 9 100 200 ‘ee! + : .
Contour interval 50 feet TM
Datum is mean sea level ° 100° 200° 300° .
\ 1500’ 1500
° 100° 200° 300° 400° 500° 600° 700 800 900°
*
3
1400'4 $ 1400
z= +
= +
= +
+
+ + + +
§ 5 § e000" 6000! 1300° + + + + 1300°
3 3 3 t +
3 3 ES +
8 s = £ B «
1100 a 2 2 4 HOO! § s
3 a 3 + + 3 3 ° 100° 200! 300" 400°
. \ \ I Lo4 + 4000' 4 5 a 4000° -
1050 . + + + 1050 = =
: + + + + = s
. S NF + + + + + . c e is E
1000’ NX . NG ++ +4 +4 1000' 1 1 1
8 yt Fo + + 2 Proposed tunnel location. .
s Nt + + 2000' iS 2000'
5 . Swen toke _
N
>
. 1000" § se sant 1000°
900 900° :
6 + + + §
4000° § 2 4000'
pleR Set cto te gS Gt a tL re a CME Se SR Beortexet 3 ;
° 100° 200° 300° 400° 500° 600° 700' 800° 900° 1000° 100° s 2
H & a H!
° 2000' 4000° 6000' 800° 10,000° 12,000° 14,000' 16,000" 18,000° 20,000° 22,000° conn 1 Proposed 1 | | | 2000!
: aT oe,
. 2 +—+ + ~—? - .
(0) N t+ + + + + + + + + + + oe
$ + + t+ t+ t+ t+ tt t+ + +
s + + t+ t+ + + + + + +
Sea level Vt + + + + t+ tt + + 4 + Seo level
«
ry
N
4000° § J & 4000°
z y 3 c s ° 2000' 4000" 6000° 8000' 10,000° 12,000°
a = 4000° € S 4000
2° s 2 :
aa z s s
: 2 c 3 * S c . 5 Proposed tunnel 2
2000) o | ij = | Proposed 1 + 2000’ s location ®
~ FY tunnel F a o
2 cy
s 2000' 4 ' 1 + + + + ' | 2000°
° + + + + + + + ; 3 + + + + + *+ 4
5 ; + a 1000" 4 Ny + + + + 1000"
lev S$
eo ies + + ot + t+ HF t+ t+ t+ Ht Ft Ft HF Ft HF HF FF FFF + FN oes 3 + + + + + HF + t+ + + +
+ + + t+ + + + + + + + . ,
Seo level 4 + + + + + + + + Seo level 4000 s 000:
ti + t+ + + t+ FF HF + H+ t+ + + + + 3
+ t+ tt Ft Ft HF + HF HF + FF + + 4
° 2000° 4000° 6000° 8000° 10,000 12,000° 14,000° 16,000' 18,000° 20,000° =
° 2000" 4000 6000° 8000" 10,000° 12,000° 14,000° 16,000" 18,000° , F = 3 .
vant fn tt aia rf 2000 sI 1 1 2000'
‘ a i
A . * Proposed tunnel location > .
J 1000! ° (probably quartz diorite) 1000!
§ =
ts
Sea level rom Seo level
+
See Plate 8 for location of lines of sections C-C, C-E, F-F, H-H, and F-I ° 2000° 4000' 600° 800° 10,000' 12,000"

620666 O ~ 62 (In pocket)

MAPS AND

SECTIONS OF SCENERY LAKE, SWAN LAKE, AND RUTH LAKE POWERSITES
Exhibit 99.12





CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON








Golden Star Resources Ltd.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Golden Star Resources Ltd.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





I hereby consent to (i) the use of my name in connection with the following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Form 40-F”) of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) to which this consent relates: (A) the technical report entitled “43-101 Technical Report on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Golden Star Resourced Ltd., Wassa Gold Mine, Ghana” effective date December 31, 2012 and filed on March 21, 2013 (the “Wassa Report”), (B) the technical report entitled “43-101 Technical Report on Resources and Reserves Golden Star Resourced Ltd., Bogoso Prestea Gold Mine, Ghana” effective date December 31, 2013 and filed on March 14, 2014 (the “Bogoso Report” and together with the Wassa Report, the “Reports”), (C) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2013 and (D) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2013, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from such documents and Reports in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-175542, 333-169047, 333-118958, 333-105821 and 333-105820), as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.











/s/ Richard Oldcorn


Richard Oldcorn





March 25, 2014
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 0872 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2013 - SW - 012 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JORGE GEORGE FRATICELLI,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 441 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of November, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Editorial Note on Part 11
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

§ 11.29 May FAA change its regulations without first issuing an ANPRM or NPRM? The FAA normally adds or changes a regulation by issuing a final rule after an NPRM. However, FAA may adopt, amend, or repeal regulations without first issuing an ANPRM or NPRM in the following situations: ( a ) We may issue a final rule without first requesting public comment if, for good cause, we find that an NPRM is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. We place that finding and a brief statement of the reasons for it in the final rule. For example, we may issue a final rule in response to a safety emergency.
( b ) If an NPRM would be unnecessary because we do not expect to receive adverse comment, we may issue a direct final rule.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0326

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TIMOTHY JOHNSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 4 2022

02/04/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0326
#### § 5.12 Computation of time.

In computing the period of days, the OCC does not include the day of the act or event (*e.g.,* the date a filing is received by the OCC) from which the period begins to run. When the last day of a time period is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the time period runs until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday or Federal holiday.

[80 FR 28414, May 18, 2015, as amended at 85 FR 80436, Dec. 11, 2020]
#### MELINDA SMITH v. MONTGOMERY SMITH.

Divorce — evidence—dead witness — adultery—certainty—her defence.

A witness cannot testify what another formerly testified who is dead, except he can give the exact evidence.

Adultery should be charged with a place to enable the defendant to meet the charge.

When a bill for divorce is amended there must be service — the appearance and waver will not be received.

The court will not grant a divorce by consent — and the lawyer making a show of defence to aid the prosecution would be censurable.

Divorce. The bill alleges extreme cruelty as the cause of divorce. At last term the parties being in court, leave was given to amend the bill, which was done, and adultery with D. Felix find L. Whit-more at divers times alleged.

A witness was called to prove what a witness on a former trial testified who is since dead.

By the Court.

Unless the witness will undertake to relate *exactly*what the other witness testified he need not be sworn. The rule has been frequently recognized by this Court.

The witness not being able to do that, was not sworn. Witnesses were then called to prove the adultery.

By the Court. There has been no service since the amended bill, nor appearance: besides, you have charged the adultery without any place, that is too uncertain to admit the proof.

The defendant’s counsel then appeared and offered to waive the objection.

By the Court. It is not our business to ratify the agreement of parties for their own divorce, nor to aid them by receiving their confessions. When an *adversary*case is brought by proof within the law, we pronounce a decree. No case can be honestly brought within the law,.by the confessions or other contrivance of parties, and counsel would subject themselves to censure, by undertaking to palm such an agreement upon the Court as *adversary*by show of defence, to aid the prosecution. Bill dismissed.
§ 121.657 Flight altitude rules. ( a ) *General.* Notwithstanding § 91.119 or any rule applicable outside the United States, no person may operate an aircraft below the minimums set forth in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, except when necessary for takeoff or landing, or except when, after considering the character of the terrain, the quality and quantity of meteorological services, the navigational facilities available, and other flight conditions, the Administrator prescribes other minimums for any route or part of a route where he finds that the safe conduct of the flight requires other altitudes. Outside of the United States the minimums prescribed in this section are controlling unless higher minimums are prescribed in the certificate holder's operations specifications or by the foreign country over which the aircraft is operating.
( b ) *Day VFR operations.* No certificate holder conducting domestic operations may operate a passenger-carrying aircraft and no certificate holder conducting flag or supplemental operations may operate any aircraft under VFR during the day at an altitude less than 1,000 feet above the surface or less than 1,000 feet from any mountain, hill, or other obstruction to flight.
( c ) *Night VFR, IFR, and over-the-top operations.* No person may operate an aircraft under IFR including over-the-top or at night under VFR at an altitude less than 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal distance of five miles from the center of the intended course, or, in designated mountainous areas, less than 2,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal distance of five miles from the center of the intended course.
( d ) *Day over-the-top operations below minimum en route altitudes.* A person may conduct day over-the-top operations in an airplane at flight altitudes lower than the minimum en route IFR altitudes if— ( 1 ) The operation is conducted at least 1,000 feet above the top of lower broken or overcast cloud cover;
( 2 ) The top of the lower cloud cover is generally uniform and level;
( 3 ) Flight visibility is at least five miles; and
( 4 ) The base of any higher broken or overcast cloud cover is generally uniform and level and is at least 1,000 feet above the minimum en route IFR altitude for that route segment.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19222, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-144, 43 FR 22649, May 25, 1978; Amdt. 121-206, 54 FR 34331, Aug. 18, 1989; Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2615, Jan. 26, 1996]
§ 625.4 Standards for awards. ( a ) If an eligible applicant prevails over the FCA in an adversary adjudication, or in a significant and discrete substantive portion thereof, the applicant may receive an award for fees and expenses incurred in the adjudication, or portion thereof, unless the position of the FCA over which the applicant prevailed was substantially justified.
( b ) The position of the FCA includes: ( 1 ) The position taken by the FCA in the adversary adjudication; and
( 2 ) The action or inaction of the FCA upon which the adversary adjudication is based.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the FCA must prove that its position was substantially justified before an award may be denied to an otherwise eligible applicant.
( d ) An award will be reduced or denied if the applicant has unduly or unreasonably protracted the adversary adjudication or if special circumstances make the award sought unjust.
SERVED: May 12,2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

STARJET, INC. 

Docket No. FAA-2014- 1115 

ORDER VACATING SHOW CAUSE 

AND 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

:· :.-- :~ ·-· ·- ,....r • t •.• : • ; \. .,-

. ·:" ~~,· ·, :.T :· .. i 

. :· -, -I '1._ • ~- '* t \1, ,_., • :· 

On February 19, 2015, we issued our Procedural Order setting compliance for 

June 1,.2015. On March 17.2015, the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter 

"FAA") filed a Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted. We issued an Order to Show 

Cause on April 27, 2015. On March 26, 2015, Sta~jet, Inc. (hereinafter "Starjet") filed 

its Answer which was not in the file. 

We will vacate our Order to Show Cause and extend times to comply with our 

Procedural Order. Paragraphs.#2 and #3 of the Procedural Order are amended as 

follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following 

procedural schedule:. 

1. Our Order to Show Cause dated April 27, 2015, be and is hereby VACATED: 

and 

2. On or before July 1, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, but 

not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cann<;>t resolve a ·discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 

and 
3. The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on or after .I uly I, 

'2015, subject to the availability of courtroom facilities. The specific date and 

time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

2 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI000 1 

ONE COPY 

Pekka Karu. President/Director of Operations 

Sta~jet, Inc .. Re.~pondent 

26 Washington Blvd., 211° Floor 

Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 

TEL: 310-301-9325 

FAX: 310-301-1556 

Lisa J. Toscano, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, A WP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Western-Pacific Region 

P. 0. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7110 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law .Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New JerseY. Avenue. S.E. (Eil-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. F AA-20 14-1115 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration. 600 Independence Avenue. S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO. Washington. 

DC 20591: Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430 .. 

3
#### § 1204.1104 Violations.

As authorized by and consistent with 18 U.S.C. 799, local policies and procedural requirements issued under section 1204.1103 may provide for punishments for offenses, which shall be classified in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3559(a)(6)-(9). A person found in violation, in or on a NASA installation, of any vehicular or pedestrian traffic law, or local installation vehicular or pedestrian traffic rule or regulation made applicable to the installation under the provisions of this subpart, is subject to punishment as provided for by the applicable local policies and procedural requirements that a Center Director or the Executive Director for Headquarters Operations has issued under section 1204.1102 and in accordance with section 1204.1103.

[80 FR 70152, Nov. 13, 2015]