alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 622.105 Conduct of investigation. ( a ) *Review of order.* Any person who is compelled or requested to furnish testimony, documentary evidence, or other information with respect to any matter under formal investigation shall upon request be shown the order initiating such investigation.
( b ) *Right to counsel.* Any person who, in a formal investigation, is compelled to appear and testify or who appears and testifies by request or permission of the Board may be accompanied, represented, and advised by counsel. The right to be accompanied, represented, and advised by counsel shall mean the right of a person testifying to have an attorney present at all times while testifying and to have this attorney: ( 1 ) Advise such person before, during and after the conclusion of testimony;
( 2 ) Question such person briefly at the conclusion of testimony to clarify any of the answers given; and
( 3 ) Make summary notes during the testimony solely for the use of such person.
( c ) *Appearance.* The provisions of § 622.3 are applicable to this subpart.
( d ) *Exclusion.* ( 1 ) Any person who has given or will give testimony, and counsel representing such person, may be excluded from the taking of testimony of any other witness in the discretion of the designated FCA representative conducting the investigation.
( 2 ) The designated FCA representative conducting the investigation shall report to the Board any instances where any person has been guilty of dilatory, obstructionist, egregious, contemptuous, contumacious or other unethical or improper conduct during the course of the proceeding or any other instance involving a violation of these rules. The Board may thereupon take such action as the circumstances may warrant, including exclusion of the offending individual or individual from participation in the proceeding.
# L_2013219EN.01S00302.xml

| 15.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 219/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 219/s3

---

NOTE TO READERS — WAY OF REFERRING TO ACTS

As of 1 July 2013 the way of referring to acts has changed.

During a transitional period this new practice will coexist with the previous one.

---
Editorial Note on Subpart I of Part 121
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart I of part 121 appear at 60 FR 65928, Dec. 20, 1995.

§ 121.175 Airplanes: Reciprocating engine-powered: Weight limitations. ( a ) No person may take off a reciprocating engine powered airplane from an airport located at an elevation outside of the range for which maximum takeoff weights have been determined for that airplane.
( b ) No person may take off a reciprocating engine powered airplane for an airport of intended destination that is located at an elevation outside of the range for which maximum landing weights have been determined for that airplane.
( c ) No person may specify, or have specified, an alternate airport that is located at an elevation outside of the range for which maximum landing weights have been determined for the reciprocating engine powered airplane concerned.
( d ) No person may take off a reciprocating engine powered airplane at a weight more than the maximum authorized takeoff weight for the elevation of the airport.
( e ) No person may take off a reciprocating engine powered airplane if its weight on arrival at the airport of destination will be more than the maximum authorized landing weight for the elevation of that airport, allowing for normal consumption of fuel and oil en route.
( f ) This section does not apply to large nontransport category airplanes operated under § 121.173(c).
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19198, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-251, 60 FR 65928, Dec. 20, 1995]
Editorial Note on Part 725
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 725 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 725.18 Creditworthiness. ( a ) Prior to Facility approval of each application of a Regular member for a Facility advance or an Agent member for a Facility advance for such Agent member's own need (provided such Agent may submit an application under § 725.17(b)(2)(iv) of this part), the Facility shall consider the creditworthiness of such member.
( b ) Prior to an Agent's approval of each application of a member natural person credit union for an extension of credit on which an application by the Agent to the Facility will be based, an Agent shall consider the creditworthiness of such member natural person credit union.
( c ) Specific characteristics of an uncreditworthy credit union include, but are not limited to, insolvency as defined in paragraph (1) to the definition of “insolvency” in § 700.2 of this chapter, unsatisfactory practices in extending credit, lower than desirable reserve levels, high expense ratio, failure to repay previous Facility advances as agreed, excessive dependence on borrowed funds, inadequate cash management policies and planning, or any other relevant characteristics creating a less than satisfactory condition. The presence of one or more of these characteristics will not necessarily mean that a credit union will be considered uncreditworthy.
( d ) A credit union (whether a Regular member of the Facility, Agent member (provided such Agent may submit an application under § 725.17(b)(2)(iv) of this part), or a member natural person credit union) which does not meet the Facility's creditworthiness standards may be limited in or denied the use of advances for its liquidity needs.
[44 FR 49437, Aug. 23, 1979, as amended at 69 FR 27829, May 17, 2004; 76 FR 60367, Sept. 29, 2011; 85 FR 23736, Apr. 29, 2020; 85 FR 62213, Oct. 2, 2020; 86 FR 15572, Mar. 24, 2021]
#### BRYANT *v.*THE STATE.

No. 8645.

August 12, 1932.

Beck, P. J.

1. Under the facts of the case, the court did not err in giving to the jury the instructions excepted to in the first and second grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial. They state correct principles of law and were authorized by the evidence in the case.

2. The additional instructions given to the jury at their request were not erroneous.

3 The evidence in the case was sufficient to authorize a verdict of guilty.

*Judgment affirmed,.*

*All the Justices concur, except Bussell, O. J., and Gilbert, J., who dissent.*

*365
      *E. 8. Taylor, John D. Taylor Jr.,*and *Q. D. Rivers,*for plaintiff in error.

*George M. Napier, attorney-general, M. Neil Andrews, solicitor-general, T. R. Gress, assistant attorney-general,*and *Dean Owens,*contra.

Gilbert, J.,

dissenting. It must be conceded that the evidence authorized the jury to find defendant guilty; also that it was the exclusive right of the jury to determine whether or-not the accused should suffer the extreme penalty, or whether they would recommend mercy. They saw fit to deny mercy. Under all of the facts of the case, it seems to me that at least the jury should have recommended life imprisonment, instead of electrocution. Considering the age of the accused and all of the attendant circumstances, in my opinion the court should have granted a new trial because of the error assigned in the fourth ground of the motion for a new trial, in which complaint is made of the charge of the court. It is not necessary to quote that charge here. I do not contend that this ground would require a new trial in all cases. I do-think that, under the facts of this case, the judgment of the trial court should be reversed. Kussell, C. J., concurs herein.
§ 797.23 Certification where NCUA is the creditor agency. ( a ) NCUA shall issue a certification in all cases where the hearing official determines that a debt exists or the employee admits the existence and amount of the debt, as for example, by failing to request a hearing.
( b ) The certification must be in writing and state: ( 1 ) That the employee owes the debt;
( 2 ) The amount and basis of the debt;
( 3 ) The date the federal government's right to collect the debt first accrued;
( 4 ) The date the employee was notified of the debt, the action(s) taken pursuant to NCUA's regulations, and the dates such actions were taken;
( 5 ) If the collection is to be made by lump-sum payment, the amount and date such payment will be collected;
( 6 ) If the collection is to be made in installments, the amount or percentage of disposable pay to be collected in each installment and, if NCUA wishes, the desired commencing date of the first installment, if a date other than the next officially established pay period; and
( 7 ) A statement that NCUA's regulation on salary offset has been approved by OPM pursuant to 5 CFR part 550, subpart K.
**Exhibit 18**

April 1, 2011 

Barrett Business Services, Inc. 

8100 NE Parkway Drive, Suite 200 

Vancouver, Washington 98662 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

We have audited the consolidated financialstatements of Barrett Business Services, Inc. (“the Company”) included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and issued our report thereon dated April 1, 2011. Note 2 to thefinancial statements describes a change in the method of accounting for legal expenses incurred for the administration of workers’ compensation claims that arose prior to the formation of the Company’s captive insurance subsidiary. TheCompany changed its method of recognizing legal fees in the period incurred to a method that recognizes an estimate for legal fees expected to be incurred to administer known claims and claims incurred but not reported in the period. The estimatedlegal fees are accrued as part of the Company’s workers’ compensation claims liabilities. 

With regard to the aforementioned accountingchange, it should be recognized that professional standards have not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another acceptable method. Accordingly, we are furnishing this letter solely forpurposes of the Company’s compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and it should not be used or relied on for any other purpose. 

Based on our reading of management’s stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting method in the Form 10-K, and our discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant businessfactors relating to the change, we concur with management that such change represents, in the Company’s circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting method in conformity with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 250,*Accounting Changes and Error Corrections*. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ Moss Adams LLP
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 84 (Monday, May 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 25416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10713]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 172; Future Air-Ground Communications in 
the VHF Aeronautical Data Band (118-137 MHz)

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for 
Special Committee 172 meeting to be held May 22-25, 2000, starting at 
9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, 
NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.
    The agenda will be as follows: May 22: (a.m.) (1) Plenary Convenes 
at 9:00 a.m.; (2) Introductory Remarks; (3) Review and Approve Agenda; 
(4) Working Group (WG)-2, VHF Data Radio Signal-in-Space Minimum 
Aviation System Performance Standards, final work and vote on VDL Mode 
3 document; (5) Continue WG-2; (6) Begin WG-3; (7) WG Continues with 
VHF Digital Radio Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) 
document progress and furtherance of work. May 24: Plenary Reconvenes: 
(8) Review Summary Minutes of Previous Meeting; (9) Review Reports from 
WG-2 and WG-3; (10) Report on ICAO Aeronautical Mobile Communications 
Panel Working Group Activities; (11) Review EUROCAE WG-47 Report and 
discuss schedule for further work with WG-3; (12) Review Issues List 
and Future Work Program; (13) Other Business; (14) Dates and Locations 
of Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web 
site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 24, 2000.
Jane P. Caldwell,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 00-10713 Filed 4-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### §§ 121.455-121.459 [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In Re: 

The Financial Oversight and Management Board 

For Puerto Rico, 

As representative of 

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al., 

Debtors

PROMESA

TITLE III

No. 17-BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered)

This filing relates to the Commonwealth

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO BE HEARD AT THE JUNE 7 OMNIBUS HEARING 

 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that creditor Hector L. Claudio-Rosario will appear on his behalf 

at the June 7, 2023 Omnibus Hearing, which will be conducted at the United States District Court for 

the District of Puerto Rico, 150 Carlos Chardón Street, Federal Building, San Juan, Puerto Rico 

00918-1767. 

Creditor Hector L. Claudio-Rosario reserve the right to be heard on any matter raised by any 

party at the Hearing related and any other matter addressed at the June 7, 2023 Omnibus Hearing, as 

well as any responses or filings related to the foregoing. Creditor’s Party Appearance Cover Sheet is 

attached hereto as Exhibit A. The supporting documentation was included with the proof of claim.

In Caguas, Puerto Rico, this 31st day of May, 2023. 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this same date a true and exact copy of this motion was filed 

with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will notify a copy to counsel of record. Also, 

copy of this document will be notified via electronic mail to all case participants. 

In Caguas, Puerto Rico, this 15th day of May, 2023. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24370 Filed:05/31/23 Entered:05/31/23 12:12:50 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
/s HECTOR L. CLAUDIO/ 218514

167 Calle Pedro Flores 

Urb. Monticielo

Caguas, Puerto Rico 00725

Tel: (787) 635-1220/Fax: 1(267) 392-3959 

E-Mail: bufetehectorclaudio@gmail.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Manuel Rendon-Flores

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24370 Filed:05/31/23 Entered:05/31/23 12:12:50 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### Bobby Earl NORFUL and Samuel Edward NORFUL *v.*STATE of Arkansas

5795

489 S.W. 2d 239

Opinion delivered January 22, 1973

*John C. Earl,*for appellants.

*Ray Thornton,*Atty. Gen., by: *Julie McDonald,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellants Bobby Earl Norful and Samuel Edward Norful contend that their robbery conviction should be set aside because of lack of identification. There is no merit to this contention. The record shows eye witness identification, possession of the fruits of the crime within minutes after the robbery, and a signed confession by both appellants.

Affirmed.
§ ̈¦

Cr

Fa

Moose Road

g

ut

i

k

h R

att

e

oa

e

d

F

Crel 

Ch

h

or

Fis

Mo e

a

R

r

oa

t

d

er

Buffalo

io

Cr

d

e

d

ek

aR

a Ro ek re

Roen Road

Hawk C

Cu

M

ste

ar

r

s

P

h

i

R

n

o

e

a

v

uffine R H

ad d

i

o

ew Road

Railroad Cree

Roa d

k

we

ad

vi

o

e

 R

n

AC 

i P

Hibbard

d

Cr

a

e

o

e

R P

k R a

ndo fi

o

s

d

a

t

S er Road

Railroad

Ri

C

d

ree

ge R

Hibbard Cr

k

oa

ee

R

d

k

oad

da

oad

o

Seve Mile Flat R n

R yd

da

n

o

u

R

P

B

ompe

e

ys

t

Pil

t

lar

u

C

ad

r

Scothern Road

B 

Ro

e

elts

e

rn

k

aC

Keller W lbo e

L a

R

m

VE RI

ber

E

t T

ld

r d

WSTON

Roa

O

YELLO

ht

oad 7

age R 3

Front ter us C

Sa

NE R

S I

n

YEL OW TO V

d

L ER

Cre

h

h

t

t

2nd

al

8

I-94 Can ek

61

1

Mill Creek / Bundy Extensive

Recreation Management Area

Alternative C

R28E

0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5

Miles

Map 100a

T

5

N

T

4

N

R29E

Map scale 1:225,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

94

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Legend

Mill Creek / Bundy ERMA

Interstate

Roads

Bureau of Land Management

Bureau of Reclamation

Division of State Lands

State Fish and Wildlife

Water

Private

Public Lands Survey System

Streams

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings 

Field 

Office

Ü
Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 83 / Friday, April 28, 2000 / Notices 24937

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per

Diem Rates

AGENCY: Per Diem, Travel and

Transportation Allowance Committee,

DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Revised Non-Foreign

Overseas Per Diem Rates.

SUMMARY: The Per Diem, Travel and

Transportation Allowance Committee is

publishing Civilian Personnel Per Diem

Bulletin Number 216. This bulletin lists

revisions in the per diem rates

prescribed for U.S. Government

employees for official travel in Alaska,

Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Northern

Mariana Islands and Possessions of the

United States. AEA changes announced

in Bulletin Number 194 remain in effect.

Bulletin Number 216 is being published

in the Federal Register to assure that

travelers are paid per diem at the most

current rates.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 1, 2000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

document gives notice of revisions in

per diem rates prescribed by the Per

Diem Travel and Transportation

Allowance Committee for non-foreign

areas outside the continental United

States. It supersedes Civilian Personnel

Per Diem Bulletin Number 215.

Distribution of Civilian Personnel Per

Diem Bulletins by mail was

discontinued. Per Diem Bulletins

published periodically in the Federal

Register now constitute the only

notification of revisions in per diem

rates to agencies and establishments

outside the Department of Defense. For

more information or questions about per

diem rates, please contact your local

travel office. The text of the Bulletin

follows:

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M

24938 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 83 / Friday, April 28, 2000 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 83 / Friday, April 28, 2000 / Notices 24939

24940 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 83 / Friday, April 28, 2000 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 83 / Friday, April 28, 2000 / Notices 24941

Dated: April 24, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00–10578 Filed 4–27–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–C
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23220 Filed:01/09/23 Entered:01/09/23 17:57:07 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23220 Filed:01/09/23 Entered:01/09/23 17:57:07 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 121.681 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes requirements for the preparation and maintenance of records and reports for all certificate holders.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Daniel Forbush, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of General Metals Corporation for the year ended April 30, 2008(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of General Metals Corporation.



|                      |  |                                                                |  | 
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: August 8, 2008 |  |                                                               
|                      |  |                                                               
|                      |  |                                                               
|                      |  | /s/ Daniel Forbush                                             | 
|                      |  | Daniel Forbush                                                
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer                                       
|                      |  | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|                      |  | General Metals Corporation                                    





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to General Metals Corporation and will be retained by General Metals Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT A

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23982-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:42:34 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23982-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:42:34 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23982-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:42:34 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 3 of 4
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23982-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 19:42:34 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 4 of 4
From: Wade, Dennis@ARB

To: Ungvarsky, John

Cc: Tasat, Webster@ARB; Kalandiyur, Nesamani@ARB

Subject: SJV Budgets PM10 emissions reductions tons.xlsx

Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 5:15:20 PM

Attachments: SJV Budgets PM10 emissions reductions tons.xlsx

John,

           Attached is a spreadsheet that contains the tons behind Tables 8 and 9 of the staff report and

the calculations to get the percentage reductions.  We can discuss tomorrow if need be. 

                            Dennis
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 21, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 21, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20A0697. KAYLA RAE LABBEE v. ATLANTA STRUCTURAL CONCRETE COMPANY et al.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart I of Part 121

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart I of part 121 appear at 60 FR 65928, Dec. 20, 1995.

#### §§ 121.1400-121.1499 [Reserved]