alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          1,947
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                   102,088
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              104,035 
<PP&E>                                          4,988
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                111,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          28,876
<BONDS>                                        61,942
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           78
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  111,250
<SALES>                                       131,556 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              131,556
<CGS>                                         120,134         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 137,033 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (5,477)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (97)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (5,380)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                     (2,234) 
<NET-INCOME>                                  (7,614)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF OFFICERS**

**OF      THE FASHION HOUSE HOLDINGS, INC.**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 USC Section 1350**

|                                         |      |                                                                                                                                                                             |
|----------------------------------------------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:                November 15, 2007 | By:  | /s/                John                Hanna                       |
|                                         |      | John                Hanna                                                                                                                                                        |
|                                         |      | Chief                Executive Officer                                                                                                                                           |

|                                         |      |                                                                                                                               |
|----------------------------------------------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:                November 15, 2007 | By:  | /s/                Michael P.                Robbins              |
|                                         |      | Michael                P. Robbins                                                                                                  |
|                                         |      | Interim                Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting                Officer                                     |
#### CUMMINGS v. THE STATE.

(Decided December 18, 1913.)

Appeal from Morgan Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. Ti-iomas W. Wert.

Wert & Lynne, for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
#### L. C. ROWE And Myra ROWE *v.*DRUYVESTEYN CONSTRUCTION CO.

5-5969

484 S.W. 2d 512

Opinion delivered September 18, 1972

*68
      *Frank W. Booth,*for appellants.

*Jones, Gilbreath & Jones,*for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

L. C. Rowe and Myra Rowe, his wife, filed this action in tort against Druyvesteyn Construction Company, to recover for the death of their minor son. The trial court granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment on the basis of a finding that the son was the statutory employee of Druyvesteyn and was therefore relegated to the exclusive remedy of our Workmen’s Compensation Act. Appellants here contend that the court erred in finding that the Workmen’s Compensation Act applied to the facts of this case and, secondly, that the court erred in finding there was no question of fact to be determined.

From the statement of facts in the briefs, and the meager abstract, it appears that the background facts are undisputed. Danny Rowe, son of appellants and sixteen years of age at the time of the accident, was employed by Druyvesteyn’s subcontractor. The latter carried no compensation insurance. Appellants filed a claim for workmen’s compensation death benefits against Druyvesteyn. That claim was denied and appealed to this court. It is being disposed of this date in *Rowe*v. *Druyvesteyn Construction Company, 253*Ark. 63, 484 S.W. 2d 513 (1972). This action now before us was filed in tort, alleging that appellee’s negligence caused tne death of young Rowe.

Appellants’ first point to the effect that the Workmen’s Compensation Act does not apply in the factual situation, can be quickly answered. In an opinion by Hon. John E. Miller, senior district judge, the precise question was answered. *Huffstettler*v. *Lion Oil,*110 F. Supp. 222 (W. D. Ark. 1953). There it was said:

> In essence, then, the Arkansas decisions lead the court to believe that to hold that once a relationship of a statutory employer and statutory employee arises, such parties have the same rights and the same liabilities under the Act as if they were employer and employee by reason of a contract of em*69ployment. That is, when the Act provides that the ‘rights and remedies herein granted to an employee...shall be exclusive...’ such provision applies to *statutory*employees as well as contractual employees, and therefore plaintiff, being a statutory employee of Lion, has only the rights and remedies granted him by the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Arkansas.

It should be made clear that in *Huffstettler*the injured employee was working for a subcontractor of Lion Oil and the subcontractor carried no liability insurance. In that situation, of course, Judge Miller held that the claimant was a statutory employee of Lion Oil. Thus it can be seen that the fact situation was identical to the facts in the case before us.

With respect to the second point — that the court erred in finding there was no question of fact to be determined — we are wholly unable to evaluate the affidavits supporting the motion for summary judgment and any contravening affidavits. That is because they are not abstracted, which of course violates our Rule 9 (d).

Affirmed.
1. Aircraft secure

– activate ac alarm

2. Batteries 100% only

3. Configuration

- FC/Tx, F/S and parameters iPhone App

4. Frequencies, RF Explorer leave on for 10 min while prep

5. Switches: IOC, Flight Mode, F/S

6. Throttle off

7. Turn transmitter on

8. Switches

9. Model profile

10. Transmitter battery > 7.7 V

11. Timer reset

12. Trims if not 0 do not fly

13. Plug in FPV monitor

14. Check FPV monitor channel

15. Plug in BTU

16. Verify green light

17. Ensure BTU is facing up

18. Clear area

19. Set aircraft on level platform

20. Plu g

- in aircraft: AC alarm, GPS 1 and 2, Start HITEC Tele record

21. Start timer 22. LED satellite receive no red

23. Satellite number through iPad, minimum seven

24. Bluetooth connection through iPad, minimum two

25. 2.4 GHz connection to aircraft through iPad, minimum four

26. Set home position

27. Flight mode switch

- cycle

28. Flight controls free and correct

29. Range check of Tx and FPV video

30. Mission Check Settings altitude, location, speed, and hover

- time

31. Clear area

– ‘Launching’

32. Launch

33. Check flight controls, stability and GPS loc k in the air

34. Last check on mission parameters: Height, Speed, Hover

- Time,

Distance

35. GO mission

- ready on flight mode: attitude or manual



### 1. Unplug batteries

2. Check battery levels and note

3. Camera off

4. Camera lens cover on

5. Secure aircraft

6. Turn transmitter off

7. Charge batteries



### 8. Post process 

### Calibrate Compass

NEW AREAS check magnetism iPhone

Remove all metal and be well away

from any metal or magnetic materials.

• Verify normal LED start sequence

• Cycle Flight Mode Switch 5 times

Manual to GPS. End on GPS.

• Rotate CW horizontally 360

around GPS antenna

• Rotate CW vertically, nose down,

360 around GPS antennaPre-Flight Checks 

## Pre

- Flight Checks

After Landing Checklist CAMERA

1. Camera ON

2. Remove Lens Cap

3. Check no record

4. Sync with GPS
#### GEORGE JACOB *v.*CHRISTIANA JACOB.

Divorce — deaf witness — evidence—interpreter—non-resident.

A deaf person who can neither read nor write may be sworn as a witness and examined by signs through the instrumentality of an interpreter who can make him understand.

A non-resident cannot proceed here for a divorce.

Divorce. Cause adultery.

A person entirely *deaf,*who could neither read nor write, was introduced as a witness. The Court were informed the witness could understand his family associates by observing the motion of their lips, when they conversed with him.

The Court had one of them called into court, and through his instrumentality swore the witness. He seemed to understand the oath, and when interrogated answered intelligibly. His testimony proved a case of adultery in Indiana, and that the plaintiff still resided in that state.

*632By the Court.

The plaintiff is a non-resident, and we have *no*jurisdiction of his application for divorce. He must apply where he is- domiciled. Bill dismissed.
# Official Journal C 128/4 Ma

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 128 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 474 May 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 128

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 474 May 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 128/1 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 2,00 % on 1 May 2004 — Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 128/1

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 2,00 % on 1 May 2004 — Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2004/C 128/2 | Notice to readers | s3 |

2004/C 128/2

Notice to readers

s3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
II 

Calendar No. 559 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3537 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2004 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 185 State Street in Manhattan, Illinois, as 

the ‘‘Army Pvt. Shawn Pahnke Manhattan Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 185 State Street in Manhattan, Illinois, shall be 

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Army Pvt. Shawn Pahnke 

7 Manhattan Post Office’’. 
2 

•HR 3537 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Army Pvt. Shawn Pahnke Manhattan Post Of6 fice’’. 

Calendar No. 559 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3537 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostManhattan Post Office’’. tan, Illinois, as the ‘‘Army Pvt. Shawn Pahnke al Service located at 185 State Street in ManhatJUNE 7, 2004 

Reported without amendment
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrants.
 By:
    
    /s/ David P. Stockert

David P. StockertPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: April 29, 2008
 45
#### MASON V. THE STATE.

(Decided November 26, 1913.)

Appeal from Elmore Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Thomas, J.

No error.

Affirmed.
#### § 7.1008 Preparation by a national bank of income tax returns for customers or public.

A national bank may assist its customers in preparing their tax returns, either gratuitously or for a fee.

[68 FR 70131, Dec. 17, 2003]
#### §§ 121.698-121.699 [Reserved]
#### § 1203.403 [Reserved]
§ 117.13 Flight duty period: Unaugmented operations. ( a ) Except as provided for in § 117.15, no certificate holder may assign and no flightcrew member may accept an assignment for an unaugmented flight operation if the scheduled flight duty period will exceed the limits in Table B of this part.
( b ) If the flightcrew member is not acclimated: ( 1 ) The maximum flight duty period in Table B of this part is reduced by 30 minutes.
( 2 ) The applicable flight duty period is based on the local time at the theater in which the flightcrew member was last acclimated.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 00-040] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of prospective patent license. 

# SUMMARY:

NASA hereby gives notice that Reality Capture Technologies, Inc., of San Jose, CA, has applied for a worldwide exclusive copyright license to ARC-14345, “MarsMap,” ARC-14326, “Mars Virtual Explorer Control Program,” and ARC-15008, “Postdoc,” which are assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Written objections to the prospective grant of a license should be sent to Ames Research Center. 

# DATES:

Responses to this notice must be received by June 26, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Padilla, Patent Counsel, NASA Ames Research Center, M/S 202A-3, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, (650) 604-5104. 

Dated: April 24, 2000. 

Edward A. Frankle, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 00-10497 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>



<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,097,193
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,718,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,165,986
<PP&E>                                       3,617,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,416,296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,391,865
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,217
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,416,296
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,536,448
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,495,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (959,498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (357,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (602,498)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.40)


</TABLE>
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24467 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:49:16 Desc: MainDocument Page 1 of 6Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24467 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:49:16 Desc: MainDocument Page 2 of 6Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24467 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:49:16 Desc: MainDocument Page 3 of 6Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24467 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:49:16 Desc: MainDocument Page 4 of 6Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24467 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:49:16 Desc: MainDocument Page 5 of 6Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24467 Filed:06/07/23 Entered:06/08/23 12:49:16 Desc: MainDocument Page 6 of 6
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00777-CR

Style: Kenneth Cooper McAfee

v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: March 3, 2014

Type of motion: Extension of time to file appellant’s brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: January 10, 2014

Number of previous extensions granted: 1 Current Due date: March 4, 2014

Date Requested: June 16, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted in part, denied in part

If document is to be filed, document due: April 4, 2014

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

No further extensions will be granted. If the brief is not filed by April 4, 2014, the Court may set a date for 

appellant’s counsel to appear and show cause why appellant’s brief was not timely filed.

Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Evelyn V. Keyes

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: March 11, 2014
§ 7.5006 Data processing. ( a ) *Eligible activities.* It is part of the business of banking under 12 U.S.C. 24(Seventh) for a national bank to provide data processing, and data transmission services, facilities (including equipment, technology, and personnel), data bases, advice and access to such services, facilities, data bases and advice, for itself and for others, where the data is banking, financial, or economic data, and other types of data if the derivative or resultant product is banking, financial, or economic data. For this purpose, economic data includes anything of value in banking and financial decisions.
( b ) *Other data.* A national bank also may perform the activities described in paragraph (a) of this section for itself and others with respect to additional types of data to the extent convenient or useful to provide the data processing services described in paragraph (a), including where reasonably necessary to conduct those activities on a competitive basis. The total revenue attributable to the bank's data processing activities under this section must be derived predominantly from processing the activities described in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Software for performance of authorized banking functions.* A national bank may produce, market, or sell software that performs services or functions that the bank could perform directly, as part of the business of banking.
[61 FR 4862, Feb. 9, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 22242, Apr. 24, 2008]
§ 792.63 Collection of information from individuals; information forms. ( a ) The system manager for each system of records is responsible for reviewing all forms developed and used to collect information from or about individuals for incorporation into the system of records.
( b ) The purpose of the review shall be to eliminate any requirement for information that is not relevant and necessary to carry out an NCUA function and to accomplish the following objectives: ( 1 ) To ensure that no information concerning religion, political beliefs or activities, association memberships (other than those required for a professional license), or the exercise of other First Amendment rights is required to be disclosed unless such requirement of disclosure is expressly authorized by statute or by the individual about whom the record is maintained, or unless pertinent to and within the scope of any authorized law enforcement activity;
( 2 ) To ensure that the form or accompanying statement makes clear to the individual which information by law must be disclosed and the authority for that requirement, and which information is voluntary;
( 3 ) To ensure that the form or accompanying statement makes clear the principal purpose or purposes for which the information is being collected, and states concisely the routine uses that will be made of the information;
( 4 ) To ensure that the form or accompanying statement clearly indicates to the individual the effects on him or her, if any, of refusing to provide some or all of the requested information; and
( 5 ) To ensure that any form requesting disclosure of a social security number, or an accompanying statement, clearly advises the individual of the statute or regulation requiring disclosure of the number, or clearly advises the individual that disclosure is voluntary and that no consequence will flow from a refusal to disclose it, and the uses that will be made of the number whether disclosed mandatorily or voluntarily.
( c ) Any form which does not meet the objectives specified in the Privacy Act and this section shall be revised to conform thereto.
[54 FR 18476, May 1, 1989, as amended at 73 FR 56939, Oct. 1, 2008]