alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 26, 1998,  AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                     0000797463
<NAME>                       GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1,000,000
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                                         5,035
<SECURITIES>                                                  74,702
<RECEIVABLES>                                                116,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   3,078
<INVENTORY>                                                      729
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   0
<PP&E>                                                        31,374
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 8,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               283,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              0
<BONDS>                                                       56,802
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                       10
<COMMON>                                                           1
<OTHER-SE>                                                    19,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 283,045
<SALES>                                                        5,325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              34,968
<CGS>                                                          4,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               9,690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               1,047
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             6,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                4,055
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   1,159
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            2,896
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   2,896
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0.00
        

</TABLE>
IB 

House Calendar No. 190 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3742 

[Report No. 108–556] 

To designate the United States courthouse and post office building located 

at 93 Atocha Street in Ponce, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Luis A. Ferre 

United States Courthouse and Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2004 

Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA ́ (for himself, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. GUTIERREZ, and Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

JUNE 21, 2004 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse and post office 

building located at 93 Atocha Street in Ponce, Puerto 

Rico, as the ‘‘Luis A. Ferre United States Courthouse 

and Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3742 RH 

1 SECTION 1. LUIS A. FERRE ́ UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 

2 AND POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse 

4 and post office building located at 93 Atocha Street in 

5 Ponce, Puerto Rico, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Luis A. Ferre ́ United States Courthouse and Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper or other record of the United 

10 States to the courthouse and post office building referred 

11 to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to 

12 the ‘‘Luis A. Ferre ́ United States Courthouse and Post 

13 Office Building’’. 

House Calendar No. 190 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3742 

[Report No. 108–556] 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse and post 

ing’’. United States Courthouse and Post Office BuildPonce, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Luis A. Ferre office building located at 93 Atocha Street in 

JUNE 21, 2004 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
#### Elaine BURNETT *v.*Bobby Joe BURNETT

73-27

494 S.W. 2d 482

Opinion delivered May 21, 1973

*Simpson ir Riffel,*for appellant.

*Burris & Berry,*for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Appellant’s motion to set aside a divorce decree was denied and she appeals. The chancellor found that more than ninety days had elapsed between *508the entry of the decree of divorce and the presentation of the motion, therefore concluding that the motion should be denied.

The petition for divorce was filed April 27, 1972, and personal service was had on June 7, 1972. Appellant did not appear or plead and a decree was entered on July 11, 1972. Some eight days before the expiration of ninety days, appellant filed a motion to set aside the decree. She alleged that she had been advised by the husband that the action would be dismissed, that she was not notified of the hearing which resulted in the decree, and that she had a valid defense. Appellant contends that the chancellor should have granted a hearing on the motion because her motion was filed within 90 days of the entry of the decree, citing Ark. Stat. Ann. § 22-406.4 (Supp. 1971).

We find it unnecessary to interpret the recited statute because, as pointed out by appellee, appellant did not make a prima facie showing of a valid defense. Our Ark. Stat. Ann. § 29-509 (1962 Repl.) provides that a judgment shall not be vacated “until it is adjudged that there is a valid defense to the action. . .” The word “valid” as used in the statute means “meritorious”. *Berringer*v. *Stevens,*145 Ark. 293, 225 S.W. 14 (1920). In *Nichols*v. *Arkansas Trust Co.,*207 Ark. 174, 179 S.W. 2d 857 (1944) we said:

> In a long line of cases beginning with *State*v. *Hill,*50 Ark. 458, 8 S.W. 401, and extending to *O’Neal*v. *Goodrich Rubber Co.,*204 Ark. 371, 162 S.W. 2d 52, and *Davis*v. *Bank of Atkins,*205 Ark. 144, 167 S.W. 2d 876, this statute has been construed as imposing the requirement that a prima facie showing of a valid defense be made before the judgment will be vacated, although it is shown that it was rendered without notice.

Later holdings of the same import are *Haville*v. *Pearrow,*233 Ark. 586, 346 S.W. 2d 204 (1961), and *Agee*v. *Wildman,*240 Ark. 111, 398 S.W. 2d 542 (1966).

Affirmed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D12-2883 ) RONALD YORK, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed July 25, 2014.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Linda H. Babb, Judge.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

Ronald York, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to State v. Crumbley, No. 2D12-2882 ( Fla. 2d DCA

July 25, 2014). We reverse and remand for the same reasons exp ressed in that case.

ALTENBERND, NORTHCUTT, and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.
#### § 623.1 Scope of part.

This part prescribes rules with regard to persons who may practice before the Farm Credit Administration and the circumstances under which attorneys, accountants, appraisers, or other persons may be suspended or debarred, either temporarily or permanently, from practicing before the Farm Credit Administration. In connection with any particular matter, reference also should be made to any special requirements of procedure and practice that may be contained in the particular statute involved or the rules and forms adopted by the Farm Credit Administration thereunder, which special requirements are controlling. In addition to any suspension hereunder, a person may be excluded from further participation in a particular adjudicative proceeding in accordance with § 622.3 or in a formal investigation in accordance with § 622.105.
#### MARCHMAN *et al. v.*WEST.

No. 8969.

November 17, 1932.

*898
      *Willis Smith*and *A. B. Taylor,*for plaintiffs in error.

*L. K. Smith*and *Beall & Beall,*contra.

Hill, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

“No nuncupative will shall be good that is not proved by the oaths of at least three competent witnesses that were present at the making thereof; nor unless it be proved that the testator, at the time of pronouncing the same, did bid the persons present, or some of them, bear witness that such was his will, or to that effect; nor unless such nuncupative will was made in the time of the last sickness of the deceased, and in the house of his habitation or dwelling or where he has been resident for the space of ten days, or more, next before the making of such will, except where such person was surprised or taken sick, being from his own home, and died before he returned to the place of his dwelling.” Civil Code (1910), § 3925. “Application for probate of a nuncupative will must be made before the court within six months after the death of the testator, and the substance of the testamentary dispositions must be reduced to writing within thirty days after the speaking of the same.” § 3926. “Upon all applications for probate of nuncupative wills, the same notice must be given to the heirs at law as required on probates in solemn form of other wills.” § 3927. The above provisions of the Code were complied with in the probate of the will in the present case.

The rulings on the admissibility of evidence do not show such error as will require a reversal.

The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Modern Medical Modalities Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Minesh Patel Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

    3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    4)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.

Date: April 29, 2003

                                                  By: /s/ Minesh Patel
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Name: Minesh Patel
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141941 & (69)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141941 COA: 286208 Wayne CC: 07-023351-FC KENNETH RAY HOPKINS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r miscellaneous relief is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the August 31, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that th e questions presented
should be reviewed by this Court.

Z AHRA 

### , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
Exhibit 4.5**GOLDEN STAR RESOURCES LTD.****AmendmentNo. 1 to****$50,000,000 6.85% Senior Convertible Notes issued April 15, 2005**This Amendment No. 1 to the $50,000,000 6.85% Senior Convertible Notes issued by Golden StarResources Ltd. on April 15, 2005 is made by and among Golden Star Resources Ltd. and each of theHolders listed below to amend certain terms of the Notes. Capitalized terms used but nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Notes. 1. The definition of “Permitted Acquisition Indebtedness” in Section 27(s) of eachNote ishereby amended by inserting “or any of its Subsidiaries” after “Company” in the secondline of the definition.  2. The definition of “Permitted Senior and Pari Passu Indebtedness” in Section 27(w)is hereby amended by (i) inserting “or any of its Subsidiaries” after “Company” in thesecond line of the definition and (ii) inserting “or guarantees of any Subsidiary” after“guarantees” in clause (iii) of the definition.Golden Star and the Holders further agree, for the avoidance of doubt, that the following creditarrangements constitute Permitted Senior and Pari Passu Indebtedness: (i) CaterpillarFinancial Services Corporation Equipment Financing and (ii) EcoBank Ghana Ltd. Medium-TermLoan.Except as specifically modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions and obligationsof Golden Star Resources Ltd. and the Holders pursuant to the Notes remain in full force andeffect. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts. This Amendment is effective as of January17, 2007.**GOLDEN STAR RESOURCES LTD.**     By: /s/ Roger Palmer   Roger Palmer  Interim Chief Financial Officer  Golden Star Resources Ltd  Agreed as of this 29 day of January, 2007. The undersigned represents that as of this date, it isthe Holder of $ 12,500,000principal amount of the Notes.     By:
Mineral Materials

Open and Closed Areas

Alternative B

0 2 4 8 12 16 20

Miles

Map 63

Harlowton Roundup

T7N

 ̈¦§

Pompeys

 Pillar

T1 Big Timber N

Billings

§ ̈¦

T2 Columbus S  ̈¦§

Bridger

T8S

R18E R29E Montana R103W R93W

T Wyoming 57N

Locatable Withdrawals are processed by Lands

and Realty; as a result Locatable Withdrawals section

is identical to the Lands and Realty Withdrawals section.

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Legend

Map scale 1:900,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Mineral Materials Closed

Mineral Materials Open

Interstate

Highway

^ Towns

Public Lands Survey System

94

90

90
§ 792.42 How do I request nonpublic records or testimony? ( a ) To request nonpublic records or the testimony of an NCUA employee, you must submit a written request to the General Counsel of the NCUA. If you serve a subpoena on the NCUA or an NCUA employee before submitting a written request and receiving a final determination, the NCUA will oppose the subpoena on the grounds that you failed to follow the requirements of this subpart. You may serve a subpoena as long as it is accompanied by a written request that complies with this subpart.
( b ) To request nonpublic records that are part of the records of the Office of the Inspector General or the testimony of an NCUA employee on matters within the knowledge of the NCUA employee as a result of his or her employment with the Office of the Inspector General, you must submit a written request to the Office of the Inspector General. Your request will be handled in accordance with the provisions of this subpart except that the Inspector General will be responsible for those determinations that would otherwise be made by the General Counsel.
Exhibit 31.2Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CertificationI, Stephen Couture, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Premier Exhibitions, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 

 
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: January 9, 2007/s/ Stephen Couture
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 

          - [I.D. 032000E] 

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice of cancellation of a public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) has cancelled the public meeting of its Research Steering and Experimental Fisheries Committee that was scheduled for Tuesday and Wednesday, April 25-26, 2000, at 9:00 and 8:30 a.m., respectively. The meetings were announced in the                         **Federal Register**                         on March 27, 2000.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: 978-465-0492. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The initial notice published on March 27, 2000 (65 FR 16186). The meeting will be rescheduled at a later date and announced in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

Dated: April 17, 2000. 

Richard W. Surdi, 

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 00-10026 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-22-F