alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, William J. McEntee, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) (Intentionally omitted)

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:

a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    WILLIAM J. MCENTEE,
JR.                   
|                   |  |  |  | William J. McEntee, Jr.                          
|                   |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
§ 13.219 Interlocutory appeals. ( a ) *General.* Unless otherwise provided in this subpart, a party may not appeal a ruling or decision of the administrative law judge to the FAA decisionmaker until the initial decision has been entered on the record. A decision or order of the FAA decisionmaker on the interlocutory appeal does not constitute a final order of the Administrator for the purposes of judicial appellate review as provided in § 13.235.
( b ) *Interlocutory appeal for cause.* If a party orally requests or files a written request for an interlocutory appeal for cause, the proceedings are stayed until the administrative law judge issues a decision on the request. Any written request for interlocutory appeal for cause must be filed in the FAA Hearing Docket and served on each party and on the administrative law judge. If the administrative law judge grants the request, the proceedings are stayed until the FAA decisionmaker issues a decision on the interlocutory appeal. The administrative law judge must grant the request if a party shows that delay of the appeal would be detrimental to the public interest or would result in undue prejudice to any party.
( c ) *Interlocutory appeals of right.* If a party notifies the administrative law judge of an interlocutory appeal of right, the proceedings are stayed until the FAA decisionmaker issues a decision on the interlocutory appeal. A party may file an interlocutory appeal of right, without the consent of the administrative law judge, before an initial decision has been entered in the case of: ( 1 ) A ruling or order by the administrative law judge barring a person from the proceedings;
( 2 ) Failure of the administrative law judge to dismiss the proceedings in accordance with § 13.215; or
( 3 ) A ruling or order by the administrative law judge in violation of § 13.205(b).
( d ) *Procedure.* A party must file a notice of interlocutory appeal, with supporting documents, with the FAA Hearing Docket, and must serve a copy of the notice and supporting documents on each party and the administrative law judge not later than 10 days after the administrative law judge's decision forming the basis of an interlocutory appeal of right, or not later than 10 days after the administrative law judge's decision granting an interlocutory appeal for cause, as appropriate. A party must file a reply, if any, with the FAA Hearing Docket, and serve a copy on each party and the administrative law judge not later than 10 days after service of the appeal. The FAA decisionmaker must render a decision on the interlocutory appeal on the record and as a part of the decision in the proceedings, within a reasonable time after receipt of the interlocutory appeal.
( e ) *Summary rejection.* The FAA decisionmaker may reject frivolous, repetitive, or dilatory appeals, and may issue an order precluding one or more parties from making further interlocutory appeals in a proceeding in which there have been frivolous, repetitive, or dilatory interlocutory appeals.
§ 121.500 Applicability. This subpart prescribes flight time limitations and rest requirements for supplemental all-cargo operations, except that: ( a ) Certificate holders conducting operations with aircraft having a passenger seat configuration of 30 seats or fewer, excluding each crewmember seat, and a payload capacity of 7,500 pound or less, may comply with the applicable requirements of §§ 135.261 through 135.273 of this chapter.
( b ) A certificate holder may apply the flightcrew member flight time and duty limitations and requirements of part 117 of this chapter. A certificate holder may choose to apply part 117 to its— ( 1 ) All-cargo operations conducted under contract to a U.S. Government agency.
( 2 ) All-cargo operations not conducted under contract to a U.S. Government agency,
( 3 ) A certificate holder may elect to treat operations in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section differently but, once having decided to conduct those operations under part 117, may not segregate those operations between this subpart and part 117.
[Doc. No. FAA-2009-1093, 77 FR 403, Jan. 4, 2012, as amended by Docket No. FAA-2022-1563; Amdt. No. 121-390, 88 FR 48090, July 26, 2023]
Exhibit 24.1

                               SODAK GAMING, INC.


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below hereby constitutes and appoints Roland W. Gentner and Clayton R. Trulson
and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in fact and agents, each acting
alone, with full powers of substitution and resubstitution, for him in his name,
a place and stead, in any and all capacities to sign and the annual report on
form 10-K of Sodak Gaming, Inc., and any and all amendments thereto, and file
the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact
and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or the
substitutes for such attorneys-in-fact and agents may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.


          Signature                         Title                     Date
------------------------------    -------------------------     ----------------

   \s\ Michael G. Wordeman                Chairman
------------------------------          and Director             March 19, 1999
     Michael G. Wordeman


    \s\ Roland W. Gentner              Chief Executive
------------------------------      Officer, President and       March 19, 1999
      Roland W. Gentner                   Director


   \s\ Clayton R. Trulson          Vice President, Finance
------------------------------     and Treasurer (principal      March 19, 1999
     Clayton R. Trulson              financial officer)


      \s\ Thomas Celani
------------------------------
        Thomas Celani                     Director               March 21, 1999


      \s\ Colin V. Reed
------------------------------
        Colin V. Reed                     Director               March 19, 1999


    \s\ Manuel Lujan, Jr.
------------------------------
      Manuel Lujan, Jr.                   Director               March 19, 1999


      \s\ Ronnie Lopez
------------------------------
        Ronnie Lopez                      Director               March 17, 1999


                                      -85-
Sections 302 Certifications                          Exhibit 31 (b)

I, J. Robert Buchanan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc.

    2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

    3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15 (e) and 15d - 15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

        (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

        (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: August 14, 2003

/s/ J. ROBERT BUCHANAN
-----------------------------
J. Robert Buchanan
Chief Financial Officer
T. O., A Child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1575

_____________________________/

Opinion filed

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Henry E. Davis, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven Seliger, Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
# L_2012207EN.01005401.xml

| 2.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 207/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 207/54

---

NOTE TO THE READER

| Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 69/2012 was withdrawn prior to adoption and is therefore blank. |
| --- |

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 69/2012 was withdrawn prior to adoption and is therefore blank.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          39,200
<SECURITIES>                                23,978,679
<RECEIVABLES>                                  188,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,206,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,810
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,192,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,206,743
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (251,019)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (251,019)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

Motion submitting Part of Exhibit II of BDO Puerto Rico, PSC’s (now known as, Old Puerto 

Rico, PSC) Response to 570th Omnibus Objection

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

COMES NOW BDO Puerto Rico PSC (now known as, Old Puerto Rico, PSC) 

represented by the undersigned attorney and respectfully sets forth and prays:

1. Exhibit no. II of the appearing party’s Response to the 570th Omnibus objection contains 830 pages. 

Due to the data storage limits set by the CM/ECF system when filing an exhibit, Creditor BDO Puerto 

Rico PSC (hereinafter “OLD”) must file Exhibit II in parts. ECF no. 24317.

2. Therefore, Creditor OLD will file several notices with Exhibit II divided into parts of approximately 

70 to 95 pages each. With this motion, Creditor includes pages 74-150 of Exhibit II. 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective title III case number and the last four (4) 

digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax 

Financing Corporation (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) 

Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric 

Power Authority (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case 

numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24319 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 11:46:32 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

WHEREFORE, Creditor hereby submits the attached partial Exhibit II for its Response 

to the 570th Omnibus Objection filed today at ECF no. 24317.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: In accordance with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9014(b), Fed. R. 

Bankr. P. 7004(b), and the Court’s Sixteenth Amended Notice, Case Management and 

Administrative Procedures Order (Dkt. No. 20190-1) (the “CMP Order”), I hereby certify that a 

true and exact copy of the foregoing was sent by electronic mail upon all the parties listed in the 

Master Service List and by U.S. mail upon all the Standard Parties listed in the CMP Order.

 In Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, on May 25, 2023. 

Juan R. Rivera Font, LLC

27 González Giusti 

Ave.

Suite 602

Guaynabo, PR 00968

Tel: 787-250-8040

s/Juan R. Rivera Font

Juan R. Rivera-Font, Esq.

USDC-PR 221703

 juan@riverafont.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24319 Filed:05/25/23 Entered:05/25/23 11:46:32 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Room Air Conditioner CEER Standard Level Calculation for all Product Classes

The following table illustrates the calculation of DOE's new CEER Standard Levels for room air conditioners. DOE first selec ted an EER standard

level for each product class (extrapolating efficency levels from the analyzed product class cost

- efficiency cu rves from the DFR engineering

analysis). DOE then used the representative capacity (identified during the engineering analysis) to calculate the represen tative active power

level from the EER standard level. Finally, DOE selected a standby power level o f either 1.4 W or 0.7 W for each product class, consistent with

both the identified standby energy levels in the TSD's engineering analysis section. Selection of the standby energy levels were consistent with

the cost

- efficiency curves in the engineering analysis. The representative capacity, active power level, and standby power level were used to

calculate the CEER standard level for each product class. The formula for CEER is found below the table.

Additional details on the values used in these calcu lations and on the CEER metric are available in Chapter 5 of the AHAM

- 2 DFR Technical

Support Document: http://www1.eere.ene rgy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/pdfs/aham2_dfr_ch05_engineering_2011

- 04

- 13.pdf

Product

Class Product Class Description Representative

Capacity
(Btu/h) EER

Standard

Level

(Btu/Wh) Representative

Active Power

Level (W) Standby

Power Level

( W) CEER

Standard

Level

(Btu/Wh) 1

1 With Louvers, Without Reverse Cycle, < 6,000 Btu/h 5000 11.2 446 1.4 11.0

2 With Louvers, Without Reverse Cycle, 6,000 to 7,999 Btu/h 6000 11.2 536 1.4 11.0

3 With Louvers, Without Reverse Cycle, 8,000 to 13,999 Btu/h 10000 11.0 909 1.4 10.9

4 With Louvers, Without Reverse Cycle, 14,000 to 19,999 Btu/h 18000 10.8 1667 1.4 10.7

5a With Louvers, Without Reverse Cycle, 20,000 to 27,999 Btu/h 24000 9.4 2553 1.4 9.4

5b With Louvers, Without Reverse Cycle, > 28,000 Btu/h 28000 9.0 3111 1.4 9.0

6 Without Louvers, Without Reverse Cycle, < 6,000 Btu/h 5000 10.2 490 1.4 10.0

7 Without Louvers, Without Reverse Cycle, 6,000 to 7,999 Btu/h 6000 10.2 588 1.4 10.0

8a Without Louvers, Without Reverse Cycle, 8,000 to 10,999 Btu/h 8000 9.7 825 1.4 9.6

8b Without Louvers, Without Reverse Cycle, 11,000 to 13,999 Btu/h 12000 9.6 1250 1.4 9.5

9 Without Louvers, Without Reverse Cycle, 14,000 to 20,000 Btu/h 14000 9.4 1489 1.4 9.3

10 Without Louvers, Without Reverse Cycle, > 20,000 Btu/h 20000 9.4 2128 1.4 9.411 With Louvers, With Reverse Cycle, < 20,000 Btu/h 12000 9.9 1212 1.4 9.8

12 Without Louvers, With Reverse Cycle, < 14,000 Btu/h 10000 9.4 1064 1.4 9.3

13 With Louvers, With Reverse Cycle, > 20,000 Btu/h 14000 9.4 1489 1.4 9.3

14 Without Louvers, With Reverse Cycle, > 14,000 Btu/h 14000 8.8 1591 1.4 8.7

15 Casement

- only 10000 9.6 1042 1.4 9.5

16 Casement

- slider 10000 10.5 952 1.4 10.4

1 : CEER = (Capacity × Active_Mode_Hours) / (Active_Power × Active_Mode_Hours + Standby_Mode_Hours × Standby_Power)

NOTE: Active_Mode_Hours = 750 Hours, Standby_Mode_Hours = 5115 Hours
EXHIBIT 32.1



Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Knight Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Thomas M. Joyce, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    THOMAS M. JOYCEName: Thomas M. Joyce Title:   Chief Executive Officer Date:   March 14, 2006




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.