alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MAMIE F. ROURKE et al., Respondents, v. METROPOLITAN STREET RAILWAY COMPANY et al., Appellants.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

June 3, 1912.

APPEALS: Jurisdiction: Supreme Court: Courts of Appeals: Subsequent Appeals. Where a plaintiff claimed an amount in his petition exceeding the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals, and was defeated in the circuit court, the Supreme Court has jurisdiction of his appeal, and if the case be remanded for a new trial, in which plaintiff recovers a sum within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court will nevertheless have jurisdiction of the defendant’s appeal. The statute contemplates that a case once properly appealed and heard by the Supreme Court, that court has jurisdiction of all subsequent appeals regardless of amount.

Appeal from Jackson Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *Thomas J. Seehorn,*Judge.

Transferred to the Supreme Court.

*John H. Lucas*and *E. R. Morrison*for appellants.

*Reed, Yates, Mastín é Harvey*for respondents.

*208ELLISON, J.

— Plaintiffs’ action was instituted to recover damages to their property at Eighth and Main streets, in Kansas City, alleged to have accrued to them by reason of the building of an elevated railway structure along Eighth street. The judgment in the -trial court was for the plaintiffs.

This is the second appeal of the case. The first was taken to the Supreme Court by the plaintiff and will be found reported in 221 Mo. 46, where a full statement of the facts will be found, and to which we refer.

The first appeal being by the plaintiffs and their claim being for a sum beyond the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals, the appeal was, for that reason, within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. At the last trial plaintiffs were successful, but in an amount within the jurisdiction of this court, and defendant took its appeal to this court. But the case having been first'determined by the Supreme Court, that court, under the provisions of sections 1 and 2, page 190, is finally determined, notwithstanding the amount is within the limit of our jurisdiction generally.

To the suggestion that the act of 1911 includes only cases pending in the Supreme Court at the date of the act, we refer to the second section, where actions then pending in the *circuit court*which had been formerly in the Supreme Court, are referred to. It follows that jurisdiction of this appeal is, under the terms of the act, in the Supreme Court, and the cause will be transferred to that court.

All concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 750

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 750 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 750.7 Applicability in the event of liquidation or conservatorship.

The provisions of this part, or any consent or approval granted under the provisions of this part by NCUA, will not in any way bind any liquidating agent or conservator for a failed federally insured credit union and will not in any way obligate the liquidating agent or conservator to pay any claim or obligation pursuant to any golden parachute, severance, indemnification or other agreement. Claims for employee welfare benefits or other benefits that are contingent, even if otherwise vested, when a liquidating agent or conservator is appointed for any federally insured credit union, including any contingency for termination of employment, are not provable claims or actual, direct compensatory damage claims against such liquidating agent or conservator. Nothing in this part may be construed to permit the payment of salary or any liability or legal expense of any IAP contrary to 12 U.S.C. 1786(t)(3).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Registrant's  audited financial  statements for the year ended December 31, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to those financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001060755
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST V

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                       4,731,081
<SECURITIES>                                22,590,520<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  528,183
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,146,233<F2>
<PP&E>                                      12,928,899
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,022,536)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,365,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,171,787<F3>
<BONDS>                                      9,215,778
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,739,340<F4>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,365,065
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (170,555)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,498,976
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (16,805,021)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (16,805,021)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (16,805,021)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (18,013)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (18,013)

<FN>
<F1>Investments in power project partnerships.
<F2>Includes $164,237 due from affiliates.
<F2>Includes $645,822 due to affiliates.
<F3>Represents Investor Shares of beneficial interest
in Trust with capital accounts of $38,154,142 less
managing shareholder's accumulated deficit of $414,802.
</FN>

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-87553, 333-95279, 333-95933, 333-36228, 333-40476, 333-44418, 333-51504, 333-63080, 333-81776, 333-123861) of Critical Path, Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2006 relating to thefinancial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

April 3, 2006
§ 125.75 Airplane flight manual. ( a ) Each certificate holder shall keep a current approved Airplane Flight Manual or approved equivalent for each type airplane that it operates.
( b ) Each certificate holder shall carry the approved Airplane Flight Manual or the approved equivalent aboard each airplane it operates. A certificate holder may elect to carry a combination of the manuals required by this section and § 125.71. If it so elects, the certificate holder may revise the operating procedures sections and modify the presentation of performance from the applicable Airplane Flight Manual if the revised operating procedures and modified performance data presentation are approved by the Administrator. Any approved equivalent must include the information required by § 38.23 of this chapter identifying compliance with the fuel efficiency requirements of part 38 of this chapter.
[Docket No. 19779, 45 FR 67235, Oct. 9, 1980, as amended by Docket No. FAA-2022-0241 Amdt. No. 125-75, 89 FR 12663, Feb. 16, 2024]
#### § 129.20 Digital flight data recorders.

No person may operate an aircraft under this part that is registered in the United States unless it is equipped with one or more approved flight recorders that use a digital method of recording and storing data and a method of readily retrieving that data from the storage medium. The flight data recorder must record the parameters that would be required to be recorded if the aircraft were operated under part 121, 125, or 135 of this chapter, and must be installed by the compliance times required by those parts, as applicable to the aircraft.

[Doc. No. 28109, 62 FR 38396, July 17, 1997]
§ 9.7 Multi-state fiduciary operations. ( a ) *Acting in a fiduciary capacity in more than one state.* Pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 92a and this section, a national bank may act in a fiduciary capacity in any state. If a national bank acts, or proposes to act, in a fiduciary capacity in a particular state, the bank may act in the following specific capacities: ( 1 ) Any of the eight fiduciary capacities expressly listed in 12 U.S.C. 92a(a), unless the state prohibits its own state banks, trust companies, and other corporations that compete with national banks in that state from acting in that capacity; and
( 2 ) Any other fiduciary capacity the state permits for its own state banks, trust companies, or other corporations that compete with national banks in that state.
( b ) *Serving customers in other states.* While acting in a fiduciary capacity in one state, a national bank may market its fiduciary services to, and act as fiduciary for, customers located in any state, and it may act as fiduciary for relationships that include property located in other states. The bank may use a trust representative office for this purpose.
( c ) *Offices in more than one state.* A national bank with fiduciary powers may establish trust offices or trust representative offices in any state.
( d ) *Determination of the state referred to in 12 U.S.C. 92a .* For each fiduciary relationship, the state referred to in section 92a is the state in which the bank acts in a fiduciary capacity for that relationship. A national bank acts in a fiduciary capacity in the state in which it accepts the fiduciary appointment, executes the documents that create the fiduciary relationship, and makes discretionary decisions regarding the investment or distribution of fiduciary assets. If these activities take place in more than one state, then the state in which the bank acts in a fiduciary capacity for section 92a purposes is the state that the bank designates from among those states.
( e ) *Application of state law* — ( 1 ) *State laws used in section 92a.* The state laws that apply to a national bank's fiduciary activities by virtue of 12 U.S.C. 92a are the laws of the state in which the bank acts in a fiduciary capacity.
( 2 ) *Other state laws.* Except for the state laws made applicable to national banks by virtue of 12 U.S.C. 92a, state laws limiting or establishing preconditions on the exercise of fiduciary powers are not applicable to national banks.
[66 FR 34798, July 2, 2001]
# Official Journal C 197/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 197 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4922 August 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 197

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4922 August 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 197/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 197/2 | Notice of initiation of an expiry review of the antidumping measures applicable to imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India | 2 |
| 2006/C 197/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4340 — FCC/WRG) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 6 |
| 2006/C 197/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4369 — Macquarie/Corona) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 7 |
| 2006/C 197/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4291 — voestalpine/Profilafroid/Société Automatique de Profilage (SAP) (1) | 8 |
| 2006/C 197/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4179 — Huntsman/Ciba TE Business) (1) | 9 |
| 2006/C 197/7 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4258 — IVECO/AFIN) (1) | 9 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 197/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 197/2

Notice of initiation of an expiry review of the antidumping measures applicable to imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India

2

2006/C 197/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4340 — FCC/WRG) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

6

2006/C 197/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4369 — Macquarie/Corona) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

7

2006/C 197/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4291 — voestalpine/Profilafroid/Société Automatique de Profilage (SAP) (1)

8

2006/C 197/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4179 — Huntsman/Ciba TE Business) (1)

9

2006/C 197/7

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4258 — IVECO/AFIN) (1)

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 121.545 Manipulation of controls. No pilot in command may allow any person to manipulate the controls of an aircraft during flight nor may any person manipulate the controls during flight unless that person is— ( a ) A qualified pilot of the certificate holder operating that aircraft.
( b ) An authorized pilot safety representative of the Administrator or of the National Transportation Safety Board who has the permission of the pilot in command, is qualified in the aircraft, and is checking flight operations; or
( c ) A pilot of another certificate holder who has the permission of the pilot in command, is qualified in the aircraft, and is authorized by the certificate holder operating the aircraft.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19220, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Doc. No. 8084, 32 FR 5769, Apr. 11, 1967; Amdt. 121-144, 43 FR 22648, May 25, 1978]
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     In connection with the Report of HST Global, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ron Howell, Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                   Date: May 17, 2011

                                   \s\ Ron Howell
                                   --------------
                                   Ron Howell
                                   Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
**DD I**  **N THE S**  **UPREME C**  **OURT OF THE S**  **TATE OF M**  **ONTANA** DA 21 - 0521 P LANNED PARENTHOOD OF M ONTANA , et al., Plaintiffs -Appellees , v. S TATE OF M ONTANA , by and through AUSTIN KNUDSEN , IN HIS

OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY G ENERAL , Defendant -Appellant . **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appell ant ’s motion for a 8 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appell ant is granted an extension of time to and including April 15 , 202 2 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its reply brief.

Electronically signed by: Jim Rice Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 29 2022

03/29/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0521
CERTIFICATION

I, Ivo Heiden, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Zaxis International Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the  issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as 4efined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the  issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the  issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  issuer's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the  issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the  issuer's most recentfiscal quarter (the  issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the  issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  issuer's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the  issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether r not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the  issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: November 11, 2010

/s/ Ivo HeidenCEO, CFO and Chairman
#### § 1264.124 Fees.

The party requesting a subpoena shall pay the cost of the fees and mileage of any witness subpoenaed in the amounts that would be payable to a witness in a proceeding in United States District Court. A check for witness fees and mileage shall accompany the subpoena when served, except that when a subpoena is issued on behalf of the authority, a check for witness fees and mileage need not accompany the subpoena.

[52 FR 39498, Oct. 22, 1987, as amended at 80 FR 42029, July 16, 2015]
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 11997E057

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title III: Free movement of persons, services and capital - Chapter 4: Capital and payments - Article 57 - Article 73c - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)***Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0199 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0025 - Consolidated version*

Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version)

Article 57

1.  The provisions of Article 56 shall be without prejudice to the application to third countries of any restrictions which exist on 31 December 1993 under national or Community law adopted in respect of the movement of capital to or from third countries involving direct investment - including in real estate - establishment, the provision of financial services or the admission of securities to capital markets.

2.  Whilst endeavouring to achieve the objective of free movement of capital between Member States and third countries to the greatest extent possible and without prejudice to the other Chapters of this Treaty, the Council may, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, adopt measures on the movement of capital to or from third countries involving direct investment - including investment in real estate - establishment, the provision of financial services or the admission of securities to capital markets. Unanimity shall be required for measures under this paragraph which constitute a step back in Community law as regards the liberalisation of the movement of capital to or from third countries.
Order entered June 10 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 20

- 01084

- CV

ALFREDO SANCHEZ AND FERMIN LOPEZ , Appellant s

V.

LUIS TORRES , Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 03653

O RDER

Before the Court is appellants’ June 7, 2021 third motion seeking a thirty

day extension of time to file their brief on the merits. In our May 3, 2021 order

grant ing appellants’ second extension motion, we cautioned them that further
extension requests would be strongly disfavored. Accordingly, we GRANT the

motion ONLY TO THE EXTENT that we extend the time to June 18, 2021 . No further extension will be granted ab sent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 139
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 139 appear at 69 FR 24069, May 3, 2004.

§ 139.323 Traffic and wind direction indicators. In a manner authorized by the Administrator, each certificate holder must provide and maintain the following on its airport: ( a ) A wind cone that visually provides surface wind direction information to pilots. For each runway available for air carrier use, a supplemental wind cone must be installed at the end of the runway or at least at one point visible to the pilot while on final approach and prior to takeoff. If the airport is open for air carrier operations at night, the wind direction indicators, including the required supplemental indicators, must be lighted.
( b ) For airports serving any air carrier operation when there is no control tower operating, a segmented circle, a landing strip indicator and a traffic pattern indicator must be installed around a wind cone for each runway with a right-hand traffic pattern.
( c ) FAA Advisory Circulars contain methods and procedures for the installation, lighting, and maintenance of traffic and wind indicators that are acceptable to the Administrator.
#### § 1261.304 Place of filing claim.

A claim arising in the United States should be submitted to the Chief Counsel of the NASA installation whose activities are believed to have given rise to the claimed injury, loss, or death. If the identity of such installation is not known, or if the claim arose in a foreign country, the claim should be submitted to the General Counsel, Headquarters, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546.

[82 FR 29383, June 29, 2017]