alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Earthquake Hazards Program

##### U.S. Geological SurveyOpen-File Report 2006-1369Version 1.0

# C-Language Software for Computing Strong Ground Motion Metrics and Seismograph Self Noise

### *By* J.R. Evans, R.L. Nigbor, and C.R. Hutt

#### 2006

This Open-File Report releases several software modules for public use.  No warrantees, implied or explicit, are given for this software.

The software modules are (1) C‑language integer code for approximate, rapid computation of peak ground velocity (PGV) starting from an integer accelerogram (digitizer counts) and using integer arithmetic with no multiply or divide operations, (2) C‑language double-precision code (and an example of integer code for part of this computation) for computing the response spectral acceleration and related ground-motion metrics (*Sa, Sv, Sd, PSV*) of an accelerogram (provided in units of cm/s2) by the method of *Nigam and Jennings* (1969), and (3) a MatLab (Version 7.1) “.m” script for computing instrument self-noise from a long recording of the self noise of (a) a recorder with shorted inputs or, (b) a complete seismographic system at a location with ambient seismic ground seismic noise well below instrument self noise.  The latter, if the self noise of the recorder is lower or is subtracted, represents the self noise of the seismic sensor.

Test examples are provided for each routine so that users can verify their implementations of this software.  

----

Download this report as a six-page PDF file (of2006-1369.pdf; 192 KB)

Download PeakGroundVelocity.zip: Peak Ground Velocity *via* Integer Computation (13.8 MB)

Download ResponseSpectra.zip: Response Spectral Acceleration Computation (952 KB)

Download SelfNoise.zip: Self-noise Computation *via* MatLabTM (4.5 MB)

For questions about the content of this report, contact John R. Evans

Version history

----

Download a copy of the latest version of Adobe Reader for free.

| Help | PDF help | Publications main page || Western Open-File Reports for 2006 || Geologic Division | Earthquake Hazards Program  |
This report is available only on the Web

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey	URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1369/	Page Contact Information: Michael Diggles	Page Last Modified: December 4, 2006
RI0E

RITE

ha 18
+
16
s |
23 24
N

28

35

Ss SSNS LOSS
Prineville District RR
Upper Deschutes 5 6 RSSSSSNS NS "
Planning Area Sn
Tumalo sone SSs5
Recreation Area BSSSSs)
[U "7 {| 16 15 Sa
I i
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
PRINEVILLE DISTRICT
Legend N 2005
Interim Guidance for Motorized Use mmm Recreation Area w. £ (s.envarmnensee
of Existing Roads and Trails * Highway or County Road
BLM Routes Available for —— Other Road s
Motorized Travel
Closed Year Round Administered Lands 05 0 os 1
————o—
* Management ofthe land applies only to BLM [J Bureau of Land MILES
‘Administered Lands within the recreation area Management os ° os 1
boundary. This map does not distinguish
beter HY spots ad oes [__] National Forest KILOMETERS

[FJ state Land
[J Private / Other

RMP Map 24: Interim Guidance for Motorized Use of Existing
Roads and Trails for the Tumalo Recreation Area

Upper Deschutes
Resource Management Plan

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy,
reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use

with other data, Original data were compiled from various sources. This
information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product
was developed through digital means and may be updated without notification.

'MO5-04-02:MW.082905
Exhibit 99.9





CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON








Golden Star Resources Ltd.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Golden Star Resources Ltd.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





I hereby consent to (i) being named and identified as a “qualified person” in connection with the following documents, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Form 40-F”) of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) to which this consent relates: (A) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016, (B) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2016 and (C) the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on a Feasibility Study of the Prestea underground gold project in Ghana" effective date November 3, 2015 and filed on January 22, 2016, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from such documents in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-211926, 333-175542, 333-169047, 333-118958, 333-105821 and 333-105820), as amended, and Registration Statement No. 333-196906 on Form F-10, as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.











/s/ Martin Raffield


Martin Raffield


Senior Vice President, Project Development and Technical Services





March 30, 2017
#### § 619.9145 Farm Credit Bank.

The term *Farm Credit Bank* refers to a bank resulting from the mandatory merger of the Federal land bank and the Federal intermediate credit bank in each Farm Credit district pursuant to section 410 of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987, Pub. L. 100-233, or any bank resulting from a merger of two or more Farm Credit Banks.

[55 FR 24889, June 19, 1990]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00264-CR

James Ray Ross, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 08-209-K277, HONORABLE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant James Ray Ross was convicted of sexual assault of a child and

sexual assault, enhanced by a prior conviction for indecency with a child, and was sentenced to life

in prison. Appellant’s appointed attorneyhas filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and

without merit. 

Counsel’s brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 743-44

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); Anders, 386 U.S. at

743-44; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978);Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d

684, 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137, 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

Appellant’s attorney sent appellant a copy of the brief and advised him that he had the right to
No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should appellant wish to seek further review of 1

his case by the court of criminal appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for

discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. See generally Tex. R. App.

P. 68-79 (governing proceedings in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals). Any petition for

discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the date

this Court overrules the last timely motion for rehearing filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.2. The

petition must be filed with this Court, after which it will be forwarded to the court of criminal

appeals along with the rest of the filings in the cause. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.3, 68.7. Any petition

for discretionary review should comply with rules 68.4 and 68.5 of the rules of appellate procedure.

See Tex. R. App. P. 68.4, 68.5. 

2

examine the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Jackson v. State,

485 S.W.2d 553, 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972). No pro se brief has been filed.

We have considered the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. We have reviewed the evidence presented to the jury and the

procedures that were observed and find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment of conviction.1

___________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: January 15, 2009

Do Not Publish
#### Michigan Trust Company, *et al., Plaintiffs in Error,*v. George Canada, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion Filed Jan. 28, 1913.

1. Title by adverse possession without color of title may be acquired only where the land has for the requisite period of time, under a claim of title exclusive of any other right, been actually and continuously occupied by being protected by a substantial enclosure, or by being cultivated or improved.

*552. Testimony that a party is in possession of described land, that he has lived on it for 17 years, has built a house, cleared the land and fenced the premises, does not show the character of possession required by the statute to ripen into title by adverse possession without color of title.

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Judgment reversed.

*Starbuck*& 8tarbuck, for Plaintiffs in error;

*Massey*& *Warlow,*for Defendant in error.

Whitfield, J.

In an action of ejectment brought by the plaintiffs in error against George Canada there was judgment for the defendant. On writ of error it is contended, among other things, that the verdict is contrary to the evidence.

The defendant “admitted in open court that the plaintiffs had proved a good record title.” Thereupon the defendant testified as follows: “I am the defendant in this case. I am in possession of the tract of land which I suppose is that described by witness Miller. I have lived on that place for 17 years; have built a house, cleared the land and fenced the premises. All the land that is at present occupied by me, has been occupied by me for more than 10 years; I last built a fence about four years ago, and that was to replace a burnt fence and that was on the line of the old fence. I have enclosed no land, not previously enclosed, for about ten years. I have resided there with my wife and children all the time. I am a cattle man.”

This is the only evidence as to the character of the defendant’s actual possession and occupancy of the land, *56and there is no claim that the possession was under color of title. There is a claim that the possession was adverse.

Title by adverse possession without color of title may be acquired only tvhere the land has for the requisite period of time, under a claim of title exclusive of any other right, been actually and continuously occupied by being protected by a substantial enclosure, or by being cultivated or improved. Sec. 1722 Gen. Stats, of 1906.

The evidence as to possession does not indicate that the fence mentioned was a substantial enclosure or that the land has been cultivated or improved. Testimony that the defendant “built a house, cleared the land and fenced the premises,” does not comply with the requirements of the statute to mature a title by adverse possession without color of title.

The judgment is reversed.

Shackelford, C. J., and Taylor, Cockerel and Hocrcer, J. J., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, October 22, 2009 at 2:30 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, October 22, 2009 will be:

institution and settlement of injunctive actions; institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

      ( print page 53309)    
Dated: October 14, 2009.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-25037 Filed 10-14-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### PARISH, ADMINISTRATOR, v. RHODES, ET AL.

Resulting trust — advancement—sale of equity to pay debts.

Where one pays the purchase of land and the title is taken to another, there results a trust in the land to him who pays the money.

An exception from this, as a general rule,' obtains, where a parent pays the purchase, and the conveyance is to the child; in such case, it is held an advancement of the child, unless it ' appear that the parent did not so'intend.

The interest of the cestui que trust, may be reached by his heirs or creditors.

In Chancery. The complainant’s intestate, in his life time, purchased a tract of land and paid for it, and afterwards took a conveyance to his wife. He then contracted debts, and died without sufficient assets to pay them. The other assets being exhausted, this bill is filed against the widow and heirs to sell the land conveyed to the wife, which is still held by her, to pay the debts of the intestate. The wife claims to hold the land as an advancement for hér children, the issue of the marriage.

*Boalt,*for the defendant,

contended, that as there was no indebtedness'at the date of the conveyance, the land was not subject to the intestate’s'debts.

*F. D. Parish,*for the complainants,

cited 1 *Aik. R.*59, 60; 2 *Aik. R.*150; 3 *John. Oh.*488; 5 O. *R.*256.

Wright, J.

The principle is, that where one pays the consideration for land, and the title is made to another, there results a trust in the land in favor of him who paid the money by implication of law, because he is deemed the real purchaser; 5 *O. R.*256; 4 *Kenfs Com.*300. A prima facie exception to this rule is found, where the father pays the consideration, and the conveyance is to the child, which is held an advancement of the child, unless it expressly appear the father did not intend it as such. If that appear, the child holds, intrust;. 2 *Mad. Ch.*112; 2 *John. Oh.*51; 11 *John. R.*107; 5 *O. R. 256.*The case in hearing seems to us within the general principle, not within the exception. The interest of the intestate in the trust estate, may be reached either by the heirs or creditors. *340If the estate be a trust, it makes no difference that tire debts were not contracted till after the trust was created. The interest of the cestui que trust continued till his death. We hold this land subject to the debts, and decree accordingly, if the money is not paid, that the case go to a master to sell.
ted and are used herein with

 3 to 6 years old. The set

now Kit Cards, and an Activ

 Start.

rvices Administration’s

p://bblocks.samhsa.gov.
Aa

My body

Ants on

Ali’s apple
Bb My self

Beautiful, bouncing

braids
Cc

My self

Cats clap

for cackling

chickens
Dd

My body

Dolphins

dancing to

drums
Ee

My world

Eagle eyes

on the eggs
Ff

My family

Frog family

floats for

fun.
Gg

My feelings

Glow, giggling

glowworms
Hh

My friends

Happy

hearts,

holding hands
Ii

My world

I see ice.
Jj

My friends

Jiggling jelly

jumps for

joy!
Kk

My feelings

Kristi kisses

kittens.
Ll

My self

Laughing

ladybug’s lips
Mm

My self

Miguel makes

moon magic.
Nn

My body

Nest of

noodles and

nuts
Oo

My feelings

Oops!

Oatmeal on

my overalls
Pp

My family

Pass the peas

and plums,

please.
Qq

My friends

Quiet

under

the quilt
Rr

My body

Rabbits run

races.
Ss

My self

Stepping on

stars
Tt

My body or

My feelings

Toe-tapping

turtle
Uu

My world

Under the

umbrella
Vv

My family

Very violet

vase
Ww

My body

Wally wonderful wheels.
Xx

My world X

marks the exit.
Yy

My feelings

Yes! A yellow

yo-yo
Zz

My world

Zip my

zipper,

please

and

Thank You!
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 7 July 2005

in Joined Cases C-304/04 and 305/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam in Jacob Meijer BV, Eagle International Freight BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst (1)

(Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification of sound cards for computers - Validity of Regulations (EC) Nos 2086/97 and 2261/98)

(2005/C 217/40)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Joined Cases C-304/04 and 305/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam (Netherlands), made by decisions of 13 July 2004, received at the Court on 19 July 2004, in the proceedings between Jacob Meijer BV (C-304/04), Eagle International Freight BV (C-305/04) and Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst — Douanedistrict Arnhem, the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric and M. Ilešič (Rapporteur), Judges, J. Kokott, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar; gave a judgment on 7 July 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2086/97 of 4 November 1997 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2261/98 of 26 October 1998 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff are invalid in so far as they classify sound cards for computers such as those at issue in the main proceedings under heading 8543 89 79 of the Combined Nomenclature.

----

(1)OJ C 228 of 11.9.2004.

----
§ 261a.6 Board procedures for responding to request for access. ( a ) *Compliance with Freedom of Information Act.* We will handle every request made pursuant to § 261a.5 of this part (other than requests submitted under § 261a.5(f) that were granted) as a request for information pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. The time limits set forth in paragraph (b) of this section and the fees specified in § 261a.4 of this part will apply to such requests.
( b ) *Time for response.* We will acknowledge every request made pursuant to § 261a.5 of this part within 20 business days from receipt of the request and will, where practicable, respond to each request within that 20-day period. When a full response is not practicable within the 20-day period, we will respond as promptly as possible.
( c ) *Disclosure.* ( 1 ) When we disclose information in response to your request, except for information maintained by the Board's OIG, we will make the information available for inspection and copying during regular business hours at the Board's Freedom of Information Office, or we will mail it to you on your request. For requests made under paragraph § 261a.5(f), you may request that the information be provided orally or in person.
( 2 ) When the information to be disclosed is maintained by the Board's OIG, the OIG will make the information available for inspection and copying or will mail it to you on request.
( 3 ) You may bring with you anyone you choose to see the requested material. All visitors to the Board's buildings must comply with the Board's security procedures.
( d ) *Denial of request.* If we deny a request made pursuant to § 261a.5 of this part, we will tell you the reason(s) for denial and the procedures for appealing the denial. If a request made under paragraph § 261a.5(f) is denied, in whole or in part, the Board office that denied your request will simultaneously notify the Secretary of the Board of its action.
In the Commission's order issued on November 23, 1999, the Commission stated that it would institute further proceedings, such as a technical conference, after it had an opportunity to evaluate ANR Pipeline Company's supplemental information concerning its proposed new hourly flow transportation services and the parties' comments on such information.

Take notice that a technical conference will be held on Thursday, January 27, 2000, at 10:00 a.m., in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20426.

All interested parties and Staff are permitted to attend.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-1012 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M