alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William J. McEntee, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                                          
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | /s/    WILLIAM J. MCENTEE,
JR.                                           
|                      |  | William J. McEntee, Jr. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3580

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the income 

tax treatment of legal fees awarded or received in connection with nonphysical personal injury cases. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for the income tax treatment of legal fees awarded or 

received in connection with nonphysical personal injury 

cases.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Victims Tax Fairness 

5 Act of 2003’’.
2

•HR 3580 IH 

1 SEC. 2. LEGAL FEES AWARDED OR RECEIVED IN CONNEC2 TION WITH NONPHYSICAL PERSONAL INJURY 

3 CASES. 

4 (a) INCLUSION IN GROSS INCOME.—Part II of sub5 chapter B of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 

6 1986 (relating to items specifically included in gross in7 come) is amended by adding at the end the following new 

8 section: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 91. LEGAL FEES AWARDED OR RECEIVED IN CONNEC10 TION WITH NONPHYSICAL PERSONAL INJURY 

11 CASES. 

12 ‘‘Gross income includes amounts awarded to or re13 ceived by the taxpayer, whether by suit or agreement, on 

14 account of nonphysical personal injury which are des15 ignated for attorneys’ fees and costs.’’. 

16 (b) DEDUCTION FOR LEGAL FEES AWARDED OR RE17 CEIVED IN CONNECTION WITH NONPHYSICAL PERSONAL

18 INJURY CASES ALLOWED WHETHER OR NOT TAXPAYER

19 ELECTS TO ITEMIZE.—Subsection (a) of section 62 of 

20 such Code (relating to general rule) is amended by adding 

21 at the end the following new paragraph: 

22 ‘‘(19) LEGAL FEES AWARDED OR RECEIVED IN

23 CONNECTION WITH NONPHYSICAL PERSONAL INJURY

24 CASES.—Attorneys’ fees and costs awarded to or 

25 paid by the taxpayer, whether by suit or agreement, 

26 on account of nonphysical personal injury.’’. 
3

•HR 3580 IH 

1 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 for part II of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 

3 is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

‘‘Sec. 91. Legal fees awarded or received in connection with nonphysical personal injury cases.’’.

4 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply with respect to judgments and set6 tlements entered after the date of the enactment of this 

7 Act.

Æ
Thi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

The pane l unani m ous l y f i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed . R . A p p . P . 3 4 (a) (2). C G / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CA T I ON

UN I TE D STATE S COURT OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CI RCUI T J . GU AD ALUPE M AG AN A M ARQ UEZ, P et i t i o n er, v. E R IC H . H O L D E R J r., A tto rn e y G e n e ra l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 72340 A ge nc y N o. A 035- 986- 883 M E M OR AN DU M *

O n Pet i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ard o f I m m ig ra tio n A p p e a ls Subm i tt e d N ove m be r17, 2009 ** B efore: A L A R C Ó N , T R O T T , an dT A S H IM A , C i rcuitJu d g es. J . G ua da l upe M a ganaM ar que z , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or r evi ew of the B oar d o f

I m m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ ( “B I A ”) orderdi sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l f r om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s r e m ova l or de r . O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by 8 

# FI L ED NOV 30 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U . S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALSC G / R ese ar ch 08- 72340 2 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o q u e s ti o n s o f la w , B a rr o n v . A s h c r o

ft , 358 F. 3d 674, 677 ( 9th C i r . 2004) , a nd w e di s m i s s i n pa rta nd de ny i n pa rtthe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. B e c aus e M a ganaM ar que z f a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e agr os s m i s c arr i a ge of j u st i ce, h e m ay n o tatth i s p o i n tco l l at eral l y att ackh i s 1 9 9 7 d ep o rt at i o n o rder. See Ra mi r ez -J

u a r ezv . I NS , 6 3 3 F .2 d1 7 4 , 1 7 5 - 7 6 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 0 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) . T h e B IA p rop erl y co n cl u d edth atM ag an a M arqu ez i s n o tel i g i b l e for a w a i ve runde r§ 212( c ) of the I m m i gr a t i on a nd N a t i ona l i ty A c tbe c aus e he i s no lo n g e rale g a l p e rm an e n t r e s id e n t. See 8 C . F . R . § 1 2 1 2 . 3 (f )( 1 ). M a g an aM ar q u e z f

a il e dto e x h au s t h is r e m a in in g c o n te n ti o n s . Se e Barron , 35 8 F . 3d at67 8 (thi s c ou rtl ac ks j uri sdi ct i on t o re vi ew cont ent i on s notr ai se d b efore th e ag en cy ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D IS M IS S E D i n p a rt; D E N IE D i n p a rt.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2380 Filed:02/02/18 Entered:02/02/18 17:05:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2380 Filed:02/02/18 Entered:02/02/18 17:05:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2380 Filed:02/02/18 Entered:02/02/18 17:05:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2380 Filed:02/02/18 Entered:02/02/18 17:05:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2380 Filed:02/02/18 Entered:02/02/18 17:05:01 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 5
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3489

To authorize the appointment of Brigadier General Charles E. Yeager, United 

States Air Force (Retired), to the grade of major general on the retired 

list. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2003

Mr. BURTON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To authorize the appointment of Brigadier General Charles 

E. Yeager, United States Air Force (Retired), to the 

grade of major general on the retired list.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO APPOINT BRIGADIER GENERAL 

4 CHARLES E. YEAGER, UNITED STATES AIR 

5 FORCE (RETIRED), TO THE GRADE OF MAJOR 

6 GENERAL ON THE RETIRED LIST. 

7 The President is authorized to appoint, by and with 

8 the advice and consent of the Senate, Brigadier General 

9 Charles E. Yeager, United States Air Force (retired), to 
2

•HR 3489 IH 

1 the grade of major general on the retired list of the Air 

2 Force. Any such appointment shall not affect the retired 

3 pay or other benefits of Charles E. Yeager or any benefits 

4 to which any other person is or may become entitled based 

5 upon his service.

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification of Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) I, Peter J. Bradford, President and Chief Executive Officer of Golden Star Resources Ltd., certify,
to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period
ended December 31, 2004 of Golden Star Resources Ltd. that: (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Golden Star Resources Ltd. /s/ Peter J. Bradford
Peter J. Bradford
President and Chief Executive Officer
April 28, 2005
§ 611.1211 Special requirements. ( a ) *Special assessments, analyses, studies, and rulings.* At any time after we receive your commencement resolution, and as we deem necessary or useful to evaluate your proposal, we may require you to engage independent experts, acceptable to us, to conduct assessments, analyses, or studies, or to request rulings, including, but not limited to: ( 1 ) Assessments of fair value;
( 2 ) Analyses and rulings on tax implications; and
( 3 ) Studies of the effect of your proposal on equity holders (including the effect on holders in their capacity as borrowers), the System, and other parties.
( b ) *Informational meetings.* After the advance notice, but before the stockholder vote, we may require you to hold regional or local informational meetings in convenient locations, at convenient times, and in a manner conducive to accommodating all equity holders that wish to attend, to discuss equity holder issues and answer questions. These meetings are subject to the plain language requirements of § 611.1217(b) regarding balanced statements.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #3251]
 
 
 San Mateo County and the contiguous counties of San Francisco, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz in the State of California constitute a disaster area as a result of severe winter storms that occurred during the month of February, 2000, and caused debris flows and landslides. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on June 12, 2000 and for economic injury until the close of business on January 16, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 4 Office, P.O. Box 13795,  Sacramento, CA 95853-4795. The interest rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners with credit available elsewhere
7.625Homeowners without credit available elsewhere
3.812Businesses with credit available elsewhere
8.000Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere
4.000Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere
6.750For Economic Injury:Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere
4.000
 The numbers assigned to this disaster are 325111 for physical damage and 9H1000 for economic injury. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) Dated: April 13, 2000. Aida Alvarez, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 00-10019 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
Opinion issued November 16 , 2021

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 20
- 00488
- CR

——————————— NELSON THOMAS II , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1597108

MEMORANDU M OPINION Appellant, Nelson Thomas II , pleaded guilty to the felony offense of aggravated assault of a family member . On September 6 , 201 9 , in accordance with appellant’s plea agreement with the State, the trial court signed an order deferring adjudication of guilt and placing appellant on community supervision for four years.2

Appellant, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal on June 26, 20 20. We dismiss the appeal. In criminal cases, the appellant must file a notice of appeal “within 30 days after the day sentence is imposed.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P 26 .2(a)(1). Because the order appealed was signed on September 6 , 201 9 , the deadline for filing the notice of appeal was October 7 , 201 9 . Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on June 26, 2020 , over eight months after the deadline . If an appeal is not timely perfected, then a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the app eal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Because appellant’s notice of appeal w as untimely, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.1. Moreover, in a plea

- bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court's permission to appeal. T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC . art. 44.02; T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appea l must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d);
see Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Here, the clerk’s record supports the t rial court’s certification that this is a plea

- bargain case and that appellant has no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2), (d); Dears , 154 S.W.3d at 615. Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal3

without further acti on. See Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea

- bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without furthe r action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justice s Goodman, Rivas

- Molloy, and Farris

. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of Health and Human Services announces the following advisory committee meeting.

*Name:*                         National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) Executive Subcommittee.                    

*Time and Date:*                         11:00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. EDT, Friday, April 28, 2000.                    

*Place:*                         Conference Call, Participations Dial-in Number: 1-888-422-7124, Participants Code: 284339. Host: John Lumpkin, M.D.                    

*Status:*                         Open.                    

*Purpose:*                         During this conference call, the Executive Subcommittee will discuss work plans for future activities relating to the Committee's reports on the National Health                               ( print page 24213)                            Information Infrastructure and the 21st Century Vision on Health Statistics, as well as other activities as necessary.                    

*Notice:*                         This conference call is open to the public using the participants' dial-in telephone number and participants' code, but access may be limited by the number of available telephone lines.                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Substantive program information as well as summaries of meetings and a roster of committee members may be obtained from Marjorie S. Greenberg, Executive Secretary, NCVHS, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Room 1100, Presidential Building, 6525 Belcrest Road, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone (301) 458-4245. Information also is available on the NCVHS home page of the HHS website: //www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/​, where further information will be posted when available.                    

Dated: April 19, 2000.

James Scanlon,

Director, Division of Data Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

[FR Doc. 00-10277  Filed 4-24-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4151-05-M
§ 703.10 Monitoring non-security investments. ( a ) At least quarterly, a Federal credit union must prepare a written report listing all of its shares and deposits in banks, credit unions, and other depository institutions, that have one or more of the following features: ( 1 ) Embedded options;
( 2 ) Remaining maturities greater than 3 years; or
( 3 ) Coupon formulas that are related to more than one index or are inversely related to, or multiples of, an index.
( b ) The requirement of paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to shares and deposits that are securities.
( c ) If a Federal credit union does not have an investment-related committee, then each member of its board of directors must receive a copy of the report described in paragraph (a) of this section. If a Federal credit union has an investment-related committee, then each member of the committee must receive a copy of the report, and each member of the board must receive a summary of the information in the report.
#### GADSDEN B. & L. M. RAILWAY CO. V. WELLER & COMPANY.

(Decided January 15, 1914.)

Appeal from Gadsden City Court.

Heard before Hon. John H. Disque.

No counsel marked for appellant. Hood & Mitrpi-iree, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on certificate.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3443

To amend the Adams National Historical Park Act of 1998 to include 

the Quincy Homestead within the boundary of the Adams National 

Historical Park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2003

Mr. DELAHUNT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To amend the Adams National Historical Park Act of 1998 

to include the Quincy Homestead within the boundary 

of the Adams National Historical Park, and for other 

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Adams National His5 torical Park Boundary Addition Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADDITION TO ADAMS NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK. 

7 Section 4(b) of the Adams National Historical Park 

8 Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 410eee–2(b)) is amended—
2

•HR 3443 IH 

1 (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para2 graph (3); and 

3 (2) by adding after paragraph (1) the following 

4 new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(2) The property at 34 Butler Road in Quin6 cy, Massachusetts, known as the Quincy Homestead 

7 and carriage shed, consisting of approximately 1.8 

8 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled 

9 ‘Boundary Addition Adams National Historical 

10 Park’, numbered N.E.R.R.D. 386/80,001, and dated 

11 August, 2003.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3421 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3421

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 30 West Bel Air Avenue in Aberdeen, Maryland, as the ``Ripken Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2003

Mr. Ruppersberger introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 30 West Bel Air Avenue in Aberdeen, Maryland, as the ``Ripken Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RIPKEN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 30 West Bel Air Avenue in Aberdeen, Maryland, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Ripken Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Ripken Post 
Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
#### WATSON v. DUN.

Assignment of part of a contract — substitution—excuse fiom tender.

Where, one has an obligation for land and transfers a portion of it to a third person, whom the obligor recognizes and promises to convey to, the assignee may sue for the breach of the promise, treating'ihe original contract with his assignor, as *inducement*to the promise to him.

If one bound to pay refuse to do so, that excuses a demand and tender of performance by the person entitled to receive.

Don gave to McKay an obligation to convey to him $1500 worth of land to be selected by McKay. McKay transferred $600 of the obligation to Watson, the plaintiff, and gave an order on the back of the bond for Dun to convey to him, which Dun agreed that he would convey, if the order was presented in a reasonable time. The land was afterwards selected on a list given by Dun, and a deed demanded, which Dun refused, saying he had never agreed to convey to Watson separately. In 1829, Dun-wrote to Watson that he had now placed him in the stead of McKay.

*Leonard*and *G. Swan,*for the plaintiff.

*Creighton*and *Bond,*for the defendant.

Collett, C. J.

instructed the jury, that if they were satisfied from the evidence, that Dun- has substituted Watson for the $600 worth of land in the place of McKay, and had afterwards refused to convey the land, that excused Watson from making any other demand of the deed, and gave him the right to resort at once to his suit, and if that were the case, they should find for the plaintiff the $600, with interest from the demand and refusal.

Verdict for the plaintiff $783 and judgments.