alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.7****TRADEMARK ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY**     WHEREAS, Verso Technologies, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“Company”), has adopted, used andis using the marks shown in the attached Schedule A (the “Marks”), for which there areregistrations or applications in the United States Patent and Trademark Office under the numbersshown in the attached Schedule A; and     WHEREAS, Company entered into (i) a certain Security Agreement, dated as of September 20,2006, among Company, certain subsidiaries of Company and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. (“Laurus”) and(ii) a certain Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2006, amongCompany, certain subsidiaries of Company and Laurus (as each may be amended, modified, restated orsupplemented from time to time, collectively, the “Agreements”); and     WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreements, Company is granting to Laurus a security interest in theMarks, the goodwill of the business symbolized by the Marks, and the registrations and applicationstherefor.     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,Company does hereby grant to Laurus a security interest in and to the Marks, together with thegoodwill of the business symbolized by the Marks, and registrations and applications therefor,which security interest shall secure all the Obligations as defined in the Agreements and inaccordance with the terms and provisions thereof.     Company expressly acknowledges and affirms that the rights and remedies of Laurus with respectto the security interest granted hereby are more fully set forth in the Agreements.Dated asof: May 10, 2007      VERSO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2659 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2659

   To require advance notification of Congress regarding any action 
   proposed to be taken by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs in the 
 implementation of the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services 
    initiative of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 7, 2003

 Mr. Crenshaw introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require advance notification of Congress regarding any action 
   proposed to be taken by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs in the 
 implementation of the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services 
    initiative of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADVANCE NOTIFICATION OF A DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              CAPITAL ASSET REALIGNMENT INITIATIVE.

    (a) Requirement for Advance Notification.--Before taking any action 
proposed under the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services 
initiative of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs shall submit to Congress a written notification of the 
intent to take such action.
    (b) Limitation.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may not take any 
proposed action described in subsection (a) until the later of--
            (1) the expiration of the 60-day period beginning on the 
        date on which the Secretary submits to Congress the 
        notification of the proposed action required under subsection 
        (a); or
            (2) the expiration of a period of 30 days of continuous 
        session of Congress beginning on such date of notification or, 
        if either House of Congress is not in session on such date, the 
        first day after such date that both Houses of Congress are in 
        session.
    (c) Continuous Session of Congress.--For the purposes of subsection 
(b)--
            (1) the continuity of session of Congress is broken only by 
        an adjournment of Congress sine die; and
            (2) the days on which either House is not in session 
        because of an adjournment of more than three days to a day 
        certain are excluded in the computation of any period of time 
        in which Congress is in continuous session.
                                 <all>
```
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 14:14:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 14:14:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 14:14:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 14:14:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 14:14:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24 Filed:05/09/17 Entered:05/11/17 14:14:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 6 of 6
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3437

To direct the Consumer Product Safety Commission to issue standards 

addressing open flame ignition of consumer products containing polyurethane. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2003

Mr. LANGEVIN (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Mr. DELAHUNT, 

and Mr. MCGOVERN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To direct the Consumer Product Safety Commission to issue 

standards addressing open flame ignition of consumer 

products containing polyurethane.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foam Fire Safety 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 
2

•HR 3437 IH 

1 (1) More than two billion pounds of poly2 urethane foam are sold in the United States every 

3 year. 

4 (2) Polyurethane foam is found in mattresses, 

5 bedding, upholstered furniture, carpet padding, 

6 soundproofing materials, and countless other objects 

7 commonly found in homes and office buildings. 

8 (3) Firefighters refer to polyurethane foam as 

9 ‘‘solid gasoline’’ because of its flammability, and 

10 when burning, it emits deadly gases including ar11 senic. 

12 (4) Between 1980 and 1998, mattress, bedding, 

13 and upholstered furniture fires killed almost 30,000 

14 people in the United States. During the same period, 

15 these fires injured more than 95,000 people. 

16 (5) Direct property damage from foam fires 

17 over the same period was nearly $10 billion. 

18 (6) Exposed polyurethane soundproofing foam 

19 led to 100 deaths and 200 injuries at the Station 

20 nightclub fire in West Warwick, Rhode Island, on 

21 February 20, 2003. 

22 (7) A typical room fire will reach flashover, the 

23 high temperature point at which all combustible ma24 terials in a room ignites, in 5 minutes or less from 

25 the time at which polyurethane foam filled furniture 
3

•HR 3437 IH 

1 catches fire. National Fire Protection Association re2 quirements state that 90 percent of the time fire3 fighters must respond within 4 minutes. The abun4 dance of foam makes it nearly impossible for first 

5 responders to arrive on the scene before it is too 

6 late. 

7 (8) The United Kingdom and the State of Cali8 fornia have enacted laws and regulations requiring 

9 that fire-retardant materials be added to the foam 

10 used in furniture, but nationally, the United States 

11 lags behind. 

12 SEC. 3. OPEN FLAME IGNITION STANDARDS. 

13 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 

14 of this Act, the Consumer Product Safety Commission 

15 shall, pursuant to section 4 of the Flammable Fabrics Act 

16 (15 U.S.C. 1193(a)), promulgate safety standards that 

17 address open flame ignition of mattresses, bedding, uphol18 stered furniture, and sound proofing materials, and other 

19 materials containing polyurethane.

×
§ 616.600 Definitions. For the purposes of this part, the following definitions apply: ( a ) *Interests in leases* means ownership interests in any aspect of a lease transaction, including, but not limited to, servicing rights.
( b ) *Lease* means any contractual obligation to own and lease, or lease with the option to purchase, equipment or facilities used in the operations of persons eligible to borrow under part 613 of this chapter.
( c ) *Sale with recourse* means a sale of a lease or an interest in a lease in which the seller: ( 1 ) Retains some risk of loss from the transferred asset for any cause except the seller's breach of usual and customary warranties or representations designed to protect the purchaser against fraud or misrepresentation; or
( 2 ) Has an obligation to make payments to any party resulting from: ( i ) Default on the lease by the lessee or guarantor or any other deficiencies in the lessee's performance;
( ii ) Changes in the market value of the assets after transfer;
( iii ) Any contractual relationship between the seller and purchaser incident to the transfer that, by its terms, could continue even after final payment, default, or other termination of the assets transferred; or
( iv ) Any other cause, except that the retention of servicing rights alone shall not constitute recourse.
§ 107.21 In-flight emergency. ( a ) In an in-flight emergency requiring immediate action, the remote pilot in command may deviate from any rule of this part to the extent necessary to meet that emergency.
( b ) Each remote pilot in command who deviates from a rule under paragraph (a) of this section must, upon request of the Administrator, send a written report of that deviation to the Administrator.
17-03283-LTS Doc#:2309-1 Filed:01/30/18 Entered:01/30/18 14:53:14 

Exhibit Page 1 of 1
#### WILLIAM H. PETERSON v. CITY OF JORDAN.1

January 19, 1917.

Nos. 20,090—(206).

Case followed.

Action in the district court for Scott county to recover $1,100 for damage to plaintiff’s automobile and loss of chattels. From an order, Morrison, J., sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appealed.

Affirmed.

*D. E. Dwyer and F. J. Leonard, for*appellant.

*George F. Sullivan,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 160 N. W/1028.

Quinn, J.

This is an action to recover damages to .an automobile, caused by the negligence of the defendant city. The alleged cause of action grows out of the same state of facts and conditions stated in the opinion in Peterson v. City of Jordan, supra, page 384.

The two eases were submitted together and the opinion in that case disposes of the question of the liability of the defendant city in this.

Order affirmed.
221208 ORD RE FEE EXAMINER FEE APP VERSION DECEMBER 8, 2022 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER CONCERNING TENTH INTERIM AND CONSOLIDATED 

SEMIANNUAL APPLICATION OF THE FEE EXAMINER AND GODFREY & KAHN, S.C.

The Court has received and reviewed the Tenth Interim and Consolidated 

Semiannual Application of the Fee Examiner and Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Counsel to the Fee 

Examiner, for Allowance of Compensation for Services Rendered and Reimbursement of 

Expenses for the Period from April 1, 2022 Through September 30, 2022 (Docket Entry No. 

22847 in Case No. 17-3283)2 (the “Application”), filed by the Fee Examiner and Godfrey & 

Kahn, S.C. (together, the “Applicants”). The Application requests (i) interim allowance of fees 

and expenses incurred during the Compensation Period3 and (ii) repayment of $116,526.30 in 

previously withheld taxes. (Application at 7, 18.)

The Applicants are hereby directed to file, by December 12, 2022, a supplement 

to the Application explaining the basis for their request for approval of the repayment of the tax 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax 

Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3284-LTS) (Last Four 

Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation 

Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3566-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority 

(“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-BK-5523-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case 

numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

2 All docket entry references herein are to the docket of Case No. 17-3283. 

3 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meaning given to them in the 

Status Report.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23026 Filed:12/08/22 Entered:12/08/22 11:33:08 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
221208 ORD RE FEE EXAMINER FEE APP VERSION DECEMBER 8, 2022 2

withholdings that were withheld from prior fee payments.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 8, 2022

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN 

United States District Judge

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23026 Filed:12/08/22 Entered:12/08/22 11:33:08 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KYLE KLEIN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 19 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KYLE KLEIN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 20 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInfrasonic emissions from local meteorological events:  A summary of data taken throughout 1984Records of infrasonic signals, propagating through the Earth's atmosphere in the frequency band 2 to 16 Hz, were gathered on a three microphone array at Langley Research Center throughout the year 1984. Digital processing of these records fulfilled three functions: time delay estimation, based on an adaptive filter; source location, determined from the time delay estimates; and source identification, based on spectral analysis. Meteorological support was provided by significant meteorological advisories, lightning locator plots, and daily reports from the Air Weather Service. The infrasonic data are organized into four characteristic signatures, one of which is believed to contain emissions from local meteorological sources. This class of signature prevailed only on those days when major global meteorological events appeared in or near to eastern United States. Eleven case histories are examined. Practical application of the infrasonic array in a low level wing shear alert system is discussed.Document ID19860011810Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsZuckerwar, A. J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1986Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:87686NASA-TM-87686Accession Number86N21281Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 141-30-30-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-17099Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860011810.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 121.115 Route width. ( a ) Routes and route segments over Federal airways, foreign airways, or advisory routes have a width equal to the designated width of those airways or advisory routes. Whenever the Administrator finds it necessary to determine the width of other routes, he considers the following: ( 1 ) Terrain clearance.
( 2 ) Minimum en route altitudes.
( 3 ) Ground and airborne navigation aids.
( 4 ) Air traffic density.
( 5 ) ATC procedures.
( b ) Any route widths of other routes determined by the Administrator are specified in the certificate holder's operations specifications.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19195, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2610, Jan. 26, 1996]
# Official Journal L 292/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 292 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4921 October 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 292

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4921 October 2006

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Council |
| | * | Council Decision of 27 June 2006 on the signing of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway | 1 |
| Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway | 2 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Council

*

Council Decision of 27 June 2006 on the signing of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway

1

Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway

2

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-46 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-46 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 2
# L_2009050EN.01S00301.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 50/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 50/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
§ 121.133 Preparation. ( a ) Each certificate holder shall prepare and keep current a manual for the use and guidance of flight, ground operations, and management personnel in conducting its operations.
( b ) For the purpose of this subpart, the certificate holder may prepare that part of the manual containing maintenance information and instructions, in whole or in part, in printed form or other form acceptable to the Administrator.
[Doc. No. 28154, 60 FR 65926, Dec. 20, 1995]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3313 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3313

     To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit Federal court 
     jurisdiction over questions under the Defense of Marriage Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 16, 2003

  Mr. Hostettler (for himself, Mr. Pence, Mr. Smith of Michigan, Mr. 
 Garrett of New Jersey, Mr. Goode, Mr. Akin, Mr. Gutknecht, Mr. Weldon 
of Florida, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. 
Forbes, and Mr. Paul) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit Federal court 
     jurisdiction over questions under the Defense of Marriage Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Marriage Protection Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON JURISDICTION.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 99 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1632. Limitation on jurisdiction
    ``No court created by Act of Congress shall have any jurisdiction, 
and the Supreme Court shall have no appellate jurisdiction, to hear or 
determine any question pertaining to the interpretation of section 
1738c of this title or of this section. Neither the Supreme Court nor 
any court created by Act of Congress shall have any appellate 
jurisdiction to hear or determine any question pertaining to the 
interpretation of section 7 of title 1.''.
    (b) Amendment to Table of Sections.--The table of sections at the 
beginning of chapter 99 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new item:

``1632. Limitation on jurisdiction.''.
                                 <all>
```