alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WATKINS, *alias*FLUELLEN, *v.*THE STATE.

*474No. 8677.

August 16, 1932.

*B. B. Giles*and *E. A. Allen,*for plaintiff in error.

*George M. Napier, attorney-general, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, T. B. Gress, assistant attorney-general, John E. Eudson,*and *J. W. LeCraw,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

A verdict was returned finding the defendant guilty, and recommending him to the mercy of the court, under an indictment against Ed. Watkins, alias Fluellen, charging him with the murder of Guy Parris by shooting him with a pistol. The exception is to a judgment refusing a new trial.

Immediately after charging the law of justifiable homicide, the judge, applying it concretely to the defendant’s theory of the case deduced from certain evidence and the defendant’s statement before the jury, charged: “If *you*should believe, gentlemen, that without this defendant having attempted to commit any assault upon the deceased, you should believe that the deceased attempted to assault him with an ice-pick, and that he retired and was pursued by deceased, and becoming entangled in or against some obstacle the defendant could not retire further and shot him then, while the deceased was advancing upon him with ice-pick, then and in that event, gentlemen, the killing would be justifiable in law, and it would be the duty of the jury to acquit.” This charge was not erroneous, as against the defendant, upon either of the grounds as contended, (a) that “it restricted the rights of the defendant to protect himself without making any retreat;” (b) that it charged that it was necessary for the jury to believe that defendant had not attempted to commit any assault on the deceased, before they should acquit; (c) that the court should have instructed that “it was the duty of the jury to acquit if they believed that he acted under the fears of a reasonable man, even though they disbelieved that statement of defendant that he was making a retreat at the time he fired the shots.”

The second special ground of the motion for a new trial, which complains that the court erred in failing to instruct the jury *475“relative to the right of defendant” to defend himself against one who was attempting to forcibly take his property from his person, without stating what it is contended the court should have charged, is not sufficiently definite to constitute a ground of a motion for a new trial. *Spence*v. Morrow, 128 *Ga.*722 (58 S. E. 356); *Smith*v. *State,*125 *Ga.*300 (54 S. E. 124); *Knight*v. *State,*148 *Ga.*40 (3) (95 S. E. 679).

The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and the judge did not err in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the -Justices concur.*
§ 618.8025 Feasibility reviews. ( a ) Prior to an association offering a related service program for the first time or offering a service that it did not offer during the most recently completed business cycle (generally 1 year), the board of directors of the funding bank must verify that the association has performed a feasibility analysis pursuant to § 618.8020. The bank review is limited to a determination that the feasibility analysis is complete and that the analysis establishes that it is feasible for the association to provide the program. Any conclusion by the bank that the feasibility analysis is incomplete or fails to demonstrate program feasibility must be fully supported and communicated to the association in writing within 60 days of its submission to the bank.
( b ) Prior to a service corporation offering a service for the first time or offering a service that it did not offer during the most recently completed business cycle (generally 1 year), the owners of the service corporation must verify that the service corporation has performed a feasibility analysis pursuant to § 618.8020. If the owners all agree, one bank with a significant ownership interest can be delegated this responsibility.
[60 FR 34099, June 30, 1995; 60 FR 42029, Aug. 15, 1995]
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors of
Emerging Gamma Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying  balance sheet of Emerging Gamma Corporation (a
Delaware  corporation)  as of March 31,  2002,  and the  related  statements  of
operations,  stockholders'  equity and cash flows for the years  ended March 31,
2002  and  2001.  These  financial  statements  are  the  responsibility  of the
Company's  management.  Our  responsibility  is to  express  an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable  assurance about whether the financial  statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting  the amounts and  disclosures in the financial  statements.  An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by  management,  as well as  evaluating  the  overall  financial  statement
presentation.  We believe  that our audits  provide a  reasonable  basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion,  the financial  statements  referred to above present fairly, in
all material  respects,  the financial position of Emerging Gamma Corporation as
of March 31, 2002,  and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
years ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, in conformity  with  accounting  principles
generally accepted in the United States.


                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


New Orleans, Louisiana,
May 13, 2002



                                       F-2
**Exhibit      99**

**Financial      Measures that Supplement Generally Accepted Accounting      Principles**

**General      Electric Capital Services, Inc. and consolidated      affiliates**

**Delinquency      Rates on Certain Financing Receivables**

**GE      Commercial Finance**

|     | **At**             |   |
|----------|--------------------|--------|
|     | **6/30/06****(a)** |   | **12/31/05** |   | **6/30/05** |   |
|     |               |   |   |   |   |   |
| Managed  | 1.29               | %      | 1.31 | % | 1.31 | % |
| Off-book | 0.45               |   | 0.76 |   | 0.98 |   |
| On-book  | 1.55               |   | 1.53 |   | 1.42 |   |

**GE      Consumer Finance**

|     | **At**             |   |
|----------|--------------------|--------|
|     | **6/30/06****(a)** |   | **12/31/05** |   | **6/30/05** |   |
|     |               |   |   |   |   |   |
| Managed  | 5.22               | %      | 5.08 | % | 5.15 | % |
| Off-book | 4.92               |   | 5.28 |   | 4.71 |   |
| On-book  | 5.24               |   | 5.07 |   | 5.18 |   |
|     |               |   |   |   |   |   |

| (a) | Subject                to update. |
|-----|-----------------------------------|
###### Editorial Note on Part 745

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 745 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 745.13 Notification to members/shareholders.

Each insured credit union shall provide notice to its members concerning NCUA insurance coverage of member accounts. This may be accomplished by placing either a copy of part 745 of these rules, the appendix, or one or more copies of the NCUA brochure “Your Insured Funds” in each branch office and main office of the credit union. Copies of these materials shall also be made available to members upon request. For purposes of this section, an automated teller machine or point of sale terminal is not a branch office.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          27,862
<SECURITIES>                                   121,894
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,421
<PP&E>                                       3,074,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                 705,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,595,184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,666,308
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,595,184
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               278,561
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  175,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,112
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EO K

SECOND AMENDED POC

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23006-11 Filed:12/07/22 Entered:12/07/22 11:12:48 Desc:

Exhibit EO K - Second Amended POC part 1 Page 1 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23006-11 Filed:12/07/22 Entered:12/07/22 11:12:48 Desc:

Exhibit EO K - Second Amended POC part 1 Page 2 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23006-11 Filed:12/07/22 Entered:12/07/22 11:12:48 Desc:

Exhibit EO K - Second Amended POC part 1 Page 3 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23006-11 Filed:12/07/22 Entered:12/07/22 11:12:48 Desc:

Exhibit EO K - Second Amended POC part 1 Page 4 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23006-11 Filed:12/07/22 Entered:12/07/22 11:12:48 Desc:

Exhibit EO K - Second Amended POC part 1 Page 5 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23006-11 Filed:12/07/22 Entered:12/07/22 11:12:48 Desc:

Exhibit EO K - Second Amended POC part 1 Page 6 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23006-11 Filed:12/07/22 Entered:12/07/22 11:12:48 Desc:

Exhibit EO K - Second Amended POC part 1 Page 7 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23006-11 Filed:12/07/22 Entered:12/07/22 11:12:48 Desc:

Exhibit EO K - Second Amended POC part 1 Page 8 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23006-11 Filed:12/07/22 Entered:12/07/22 11:12:48 Desc:

Exhibit EO K - Second Amended POC part 1 Page 9 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23006-11 Filed:12/07/22 Entered:12/07/22 11:12:48 Desc:

Exhibit EO K - Second Amended POC part 1 Page 10 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23006-11 Filed:12/07/22 Entered:12/07/22 11:12:48 Desc:

Exhibit EO K - Second Amended POC part 1 Page 11 of 12
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23006-11 Filed:12/07/22 Entered:12/07/22 11:12:48 Desc:

Exhibit EO K - Second Amended POC part 1 Page 12 of 12
#### MORRIS V. TOWN OF ELBA.

(Decided June 12, 1913.)

Appeal from Coffee Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. A. Owen, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on certificate.
#### Witherspoon *v.*Spring.

After a forthcoming bond taken and forfeited, a second execution, levy, and . bond, on the same judgment, are absolutely void.

ERROR to the circuit court of Franklin county.

Stuart for the plaintiff in error,

cited Rev. Code, 303, sect. 38; acts of 1837, 96-7.

Mr. Justice Pray

delivered the opinion of the court.

This cause came up from the circuit court of the county of Franklin.

The material facts of the case are as follows:

At the April term of said court, in the year 1833, the defendant in error obtained a judgment against the plaintiff for the sum of 345 dollars, 53^ cents. On the 33d of August, of the same year, he sued out a writ of *fieri facias*upon the judgment so rendered, returnable to the ensuing term of October. This writ was duly levied on the property of this plaintiff, a forthcoming bond taken by the sheriff and forfeited.

On the 3d of September, 1834, a second writ of *fieri facias*was sued upon the same judgment, which was also levied on the property of the plaintiff, and a forthcoming bond taken. At the term of October, in the same year, the return term of the last mentioned execution, motion was made to quash the same, together with the levy, and bond made and taken in pursuance thereof for the following reason:

“ That the judgment upon which said execution was awarded, had been fully satisfied by the levy of a former execution, and the taking and forfeiture of a forthcoming bond.”

This reason, although fully established in the court below, was deemed insufficient to sustain the motion, which was accordingly overruled, and the cause brought to this court by writ of error.

*61It has long been the settled law of this court, that the levy of a writ of *fieri facias,*followed by the taking and forfeiture of a forthcoming bond, is a full satisfaction of the judgment upon which the execution was issued.

This law being applied to the case before us, it will appear that the second execution, levy and bond were absolutely void.'

The judgment of the court below must, therefore, be reversed, and the motion to quash sustained.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Luther E. Proper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Luther E. Proper   
|    |  | Luther E. Proper       
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | March 23, 2004         



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Killbuck Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 619.9200 Loss-sharing agreements.

A contractual arrangement under which the parties agree to share losses associated with loans or otherwise, as may be provided for in the agreement.

[42 FR 20457, Apr. 20, 1977]
#### VANLEAR AND WIFE *v.*HASLET’S EXECUTOR.

Assumpsit — not implied agaiiist an executor with assets.

Assumpsit will not lie against an executor for a distributory part of the testator’s estate, ttiith* out an express promise to pay — and admission of assets raises no implied assumpsit.

The plaintiff declares in assumpsit for one-seventh,of the residue of the testator’s estate, and avers a settlement of the estate with *458the Probate *Court, and a*balance in the hands of the executor. Plea non assumpsit and notice of *setoff.*

*Marsh,*for the plaintiff.

*B. Tappan,*contra.

Wood, J.

The only question submitted to us, is whether assumpsit will lie for a legacy upon an *implied*promise by an executor, arising from the admission of assets. The case in 5 *T. R.*690, expressly decides that such recovery cannot be had. The case might be different, if there were proof of an express promise by the executor, and an admission, of assets.

The plaintiff had leave to enter a non suit.
0 2 4 8 12 16 20

Miles

Map 181

Roundup Harlowton

T7N

Pompeys Pillar

T Big Timber 1N Billings T2 Columbus S

Bridger

T8S

R18E R29E Montana

R104W R93W

T Wyoming 57N

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Map scale 1:900,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in April 2015

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Legend

Sage Grouse PMHA and 

GMHA and Solar Energy

Allocations

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Sage Grouse PMHA 

Sage Grouse GMHA

Solar Avoidance

Solar Exclusion

Solar Open

^ Towns

Public Lands Survey System
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10496]



[[Page 24716]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 00-039]


NASA Advisory Council, Life and Microgravity Sciences and 
Applications Advisory Committee, Life Sciences Advisory Subcommittee; 
Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Life 
and Microgravity Sciences and Applications Advisory Committee, Life 
Sciences Advisory Subcommittee.

DATES: Wednesday, May 17, 2000, 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Center for Advanced Space Studies (CASS), 3600 Bay Area 
Blvd., 1045-Hess Room, Houston, TX, 77058.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Tomko, Code UL, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-
2211.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Action Status
--Life Sciences Division Update
--Biology Research Project Status Report
--Biology Pillars--Organization, Management, and Budget Briefing
--FY 2000 Budget Status and FY 2001 Budget Plan
--IRB and IACUC Process in NASA Status
--Review of LSAS Archiving Task Force
--HRF Status Report
--FY 2000 Performance Metrics
--Review of Committee Findings and Recommendations

It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate 
the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be 
requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: April 24, 2000.
Matthew M. Crouch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-10496 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
# Euroopan unionin C 464A/17.

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 464A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 64. vuosikerta17. marraskuuta 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 464A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

64. vuosikerta17. marraskuuta 2021

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | Oikaisuja |
| 2021/C 464 A/01 | Oikaisu ilmoitukseen avoinna olevasta pääneuvonantajan tehtävästä – Euroopan innovaationeuvoston johtokunnan puheenjohtaja (Väliaikainen toimihenkilö – palkkaluokka AD 14) – COM/2021/10408 ( EUVL C 432 A, 26.10.2021 ) | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

Oikaisuja

2021/C 464 A/01

Oikaisu ilmoitukseen avoinna olevasta pääneuvonantajan tehtävästä – Euroopan innovaationeuvoston johtokunnan puheenjohtaja (Väliaikainen toimihenkilö – palkkaluokka AD 14) – COM/2021/10408 ( EUVL C 432 A, 26.10.2021 )

( EUVL C 432 A, 26.10.2021 )

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

Oikaisuja

| 17.11.2021 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 464/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2021

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 464/1

---

Oikaisu ilmoitukseen avoinna olevasta pääneuvonantajan tehtävästä – Euroopan innovaationeuvoston johtokunnan puheenjohtaja

(Väliaikainen toimihenkilö – palkkaluokka AD 14)

COM/2021/10408

(
  Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti C 432 A, 26. lokakuuta 2021
  )

(2021/C 464 A/01)

Sivulla 5, kohdassa ”Rekisteröitymisen määräaika”, ensimmäisessä kappaleessa:

| on: | ”Rekisteröityminen päättyy 26. marraskuuta 2021 klo 12.00 (Belgian aikaa), jonka jälkeen rekisteröityminen ei ole enää mahdollista.” |
| --- | --- |

on:

”Rekisteröityminen päättyy 26. marraskuuta 2021 klo 12.00 (Belgian aikaa), jonka jälkeen rekisteröityminen ei ole enää mahdollista.”

| pitää olla: | ”Rekisteröityminen päättyy 17. joulukuuta 2021 klo 12.00 (Belgian aikaa), jonka jälkeen rekisteröityminen ei ole enää mahdollista.” |
| --- | --- |

pitää olla:

pitää olla:

”Rekisteröityminen päättyy 17. joulukuuta 2021 klo 12.00 (Belgian aikaa), jonka jälkeen rekisteröityminen ei ole enää mahdollista.”

---
Exhibit 10.1




 




Cardiotech International, Inc.




78-E Olympia Avenue




Woburn, MA 01801




781-933-4772




 




April 7, 2003




 




To:                              GISH

BIOMEDICAL, INC. (GISH)




REGISTERED

HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK




 




RE:                              Notice

of Consummation of Acquisition of




Gish Biomedical, Inc. by Cardiotech International, Inc.




 




The purpose of this letter is

to notify you that the merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement, dated

October 25, 2002, among Cardiotech International, Inc., Gish Biomedical, Inc.

and Gish Acquisition Corp., closed on April 7, 2003 (the “Effective Date”).




 




As of that date, each issued

and outstanding share of Common Stock of Gish has the right to receive 1.3422

shares of Common Stock of Cardiotech International, Inc. Fractional shares,

have the right to receive a proportionate cash payment at the rate of $1.5124

per whole share.




 




The American Stock Transfer and

Trust Company of New York, New York, has been designated as the Transfer Agent

to accept your Gish stock certificate(s) and to exchange such for Cardiotech

International, Inc. Common Stock. As of the close of business on the Effective

Date, your name was listed on the Gish stock transfer books as the record

holder of certificate(s) representing the number of shares of Common Stock

reflected beneath your name on the enclosed Letter of Transmittal.




 




Upon surrender to American

Stock Transfer and Trust Company of your Gish stock certificate(s), together

with a completed and duly executed Letter of Transmittal, the Transfer Agent

will promptly issue to you the proper number of shares of Cardiotech Common

Stock. Fractional shares of Cardiotech Common Stock will not be issued for any

fractional share to which you may be entitled. Instead you will proportionately

receive $1.5124 per whole share.




 




The means of delivery of your

certificate(s), and the risk of loss in case of failure to deliver, are your

responsibility. An American Stock Transfer and Trust Company self-addressed,

return envelope is enclosed should you desire to use it to deliver your

certificates to the Transfer Agent. Registered mail is recommended, with a

return receipt requested, properly insured.




 




	

   


  	

  Yours very

  truly,


  
	

   


  	

   


  
	

   


  	

  /s/ Dr.

  Michael Szycher


  
	

   


  	

  Dr. Michael

  Szycher


  
	

   


  	

  Chairman