alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 278/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 278 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 618 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 278

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 618 August 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 278/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8877 — LyondellBasell Industries/A Schulman) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 278/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8877 — LyondellBasell Industries/A Schulman) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 278/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2018/C 278/03 | Commission Decision of 24 July 2018 on the Facility for Refugees in Turkey amending Commission Decision C(2015) 9500 as regards the contribution to the Facility for Refugees in Turkey | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 278/02

Euro exchange rates

2

2018/C 278/03

Commission Decision of 24 July 2018 on the Facility for Refugees in Turkey amending Commission Decision C(2015) 9500 as regards the contribution to the Facility for Refugees in Turkey

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 278/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9027 — Fosun International/FFT) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| 2018/C 278/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8912 — Carlyle/The specialty chemicals business of Akzo Nobel) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2018/C 278/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9027 — Fosun International/FFT) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

2018/C 278/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8912 — Carlyle/The specialty chemicals business of Akzo Nobel) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
p.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

88) IV-C-54 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:55 AM Sheet 88 of 232 
P.2 

R-87-X2 

$ 5 2 $ SK 3 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

+>. 

*U pqO*t° 

^ 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

m£ FEB 2m% 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Peter H. Kostmayer 

House of Representatives 

Washington, D. C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Kostmayer: 

Thank you for taking the time to once again send us 

your comments on EPA's proposed action to control vapors 

generated during the refueling of motor vehicles. A copy of 

your letter will be placed in the public docket for this 

rulemaking. 

As you know, EPA has proposed that these pollutants be 

controlled by the installation of "onboard" systems on ne* 

gasoline-powered vehicles. This proposal involves complex. 

and controversial issues, and we have spent a great deal o£ 

time analyzing the environmental and economic impacts. We 

held a public hearing on the proposal this past October, 

and we expect to receive many additional comments by the 

time the comment period closes on February 11, 1988. 

Once again, thank you for sharing your views on this 

matter. They will be considered as we proceed with the next 

phase of the rulemaking. 

Sincerely yours, 

vr\i-J-'-.r\!_ O . 

:-.!* ; • ''•• r. rRichard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

VG.C. cc: Docket. A-87-11 

1 r
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00542-CR

Guy Ramirez PEREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR6007

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 19, 2011

DISMISSED

Guy Ramirez Perez entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which he 

pleaded guilty to a felony offense. The trial court imposed sentence in accordance with the 

agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO 

right of appeal.” Perez timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the trial 

court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea bargain agreement, has been filed. See
04-11-00542-CR

- 2 -

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the 

defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id.

The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the 

punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2). The record also appears to support the trial court’s certification that Perez does not 

have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that 

court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is 

accurate). 

On August 30, 2011, we gave Perez notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an 

amended trial court certification showing he has the right to appeal has been made part of the 

appellate record by September 29, 2011. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 

S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 

WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). An amended 

certification showing Perez has the right to appeal has not been filed. We therefore dismiss this 

appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
§ 121.525 Flight time limitations: Pilots serving in more than one kind of flight crew. ( a ) This section applies to each pilot assigned during any 30 consecutive days to more than one type of flight crew.
( b ) The flight time limitations for a pilot who is scheduled for duty aloft for more than 20 hours in two-pilot crews in 30 consecutive days, or whose assignment in such a crew is interrupted more than once in any 30 consecutive days by assignment to a crew of two or more pilots and an additional flight crewmember, are those listed in §§ 121.503 through 121.509, as appropriate.
( c ) Except for a pilot covered by paragraph (b) of this section, the flight time limitations for a pilot scheduled for duty aloft for more than 20 hours in two-pilot and additional flight crewmember crews in 30 consecutive days or whose assignment in such a crew is interrupted more than once in any 30 consecutive days by assignment to a crew consisting of three pilots and an additional flight crewmember, are those set forth in § 121.521.
( d ) The flight time limitations for a pilot to whom paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section do not apply, and who is scheduled for duty aloft for a total of not more than 20 hours within 30 consecutive days in two-pilot crews (with or without additional flight crewmembers) are those set forth in § 121.523.
( e ) The flight time limitations for a pilot assigned to each of two-pilot, two-pilot and additional flight crewmember, and three-pilot and additional flight crewmember crews in 30 consecutive days, and who is not subject to paragraph (b), (c), or (d) of this section, are those listed in § 121.523.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10646]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6586-6]


Draft General NPDES Permit for Seafood Processors in Alaska in 
Waters of the United States; General NPDES Permit No. AK-G52-0000

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, published a 
document in the Federal Register of April 21, 2000, concerning a notice 
of a draft general NPDES permit. The document contained an incorrect 
number for the total allowable residues of offal to be discharged.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Florence Carroll, 206-553-1760.

Correction

    In the Federal Register issue of April 21, 2000, in FR Doc. 00-
10037, on page 21432, in the third column, correct the last sentence in 
the third paragraph of the SUMMARY section to read:

    The total allowable residues of offal for permittees covered 
under the proposed permit must not exceed ten million pounds per 
year (based on deposition modeling using EPA's Water Quality 
Analysis Simulation Program).

    Dated: April 21, 2000.
Randall F. Smith,
Director, Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 00-10646 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6213-01-P
§ 48.4 Supervisory non-objection. ( a ) *Supervisory non-objection required.* Before commencing a retail forex business, a national bank must provide the OCC with prior notice and obtain from the OCC a written supervisory non-objection.
( b ) *Requirements for obtaining supervisory non-objection.* ( 1 ) In order to obtain a written supervisory non-objection, a national bank must: ( i ) Establish to the satisfaction of the OCC that the national bank has established and implemented written policies, procedures, and risk measurement and management systems and controls for the purpose of ensuring that it conducts retail forex transactions in a safe and sound manner and in compliance with this part; and
( ii ) Provide such other information as the OCC may require.
( 2 ) The information provided under paragraph (b)(1) of this section must include, without limitation, information regarding: ( i ) Customer due diligence, including without limitation credit evaluations, customer appropriateness, and “know your customer” documentation;
( ii ) New product approvals;
( iii ) The haircuts that the national bank will apply to noncash margin as provided in § 48.9(b)(2); and
( iv ) Conflicts of interest.
( c ) *Treatment of existing retail forex businesses.* A national bank that is engaged in a retail forex business on July 15, 2011 or September 12, 2011 for Federal savings associations, may continue to do so for up to six months, subject to an extension of time by the OCC, if it requests the supervisory non-objection required by paragraph (a) of this section within 30 days of July 15, 2011 or September 12, 2011 for Federal savings associations, and submits the information required to be submitted under paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) *Compliance with the Commodity Exchange Act.* A national bank that is engaged in a retail forex business on July 15, 2011 or September 12, 2011 for Federal savings associations and complies with paragraph (c) of this section will be deemed, during the six-month or extended period described in paragraph (c) of this section, to be acting pursuant to a rule or regulation described in section 2(c)(2)(E)(ii)(I) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E)(ii)(I)).
[76 FR 41384, July 14, 2011, as amended at 76 FR 56096, Sept. 12, 2011]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10346]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, May 5, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-10346 Filed 4-21-00; 11:32 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
**Exhibit 31.2****Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification**I, Juliet M. Reising, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 ofVerso Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:October 6, 2006         /s/ Juliet M. Reising   Juliet M. Reising,   Executive Vice President and
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Allan J. Marter, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (“Registrant”); 2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date:February 3, 2005
/s/ ALLAN J. MARTERAllan J. Marter
§ 121.641 Fuel supply: Nonturbine and turbo-propeller-powered airplanes: Flag operations. ( a ) No person may dispatch or take off a nonturbine or turbo-propeller-powered airplane unless, considering the wind and other weather conditions expected, it has enough fuel— ( 1 ) To fly to and land at the airport to which it is dispatched;
( 2 ) Thereafter, to fly to and land at the most distant alternate airport specified in the dispatch release; and
( 3 ) Thereafter, to fly for 30 minutes plus 15 percent of the total time required to fly at normal cruising fuel consumption to the airports specified in paragraphs (a) (1) and (2) of this section or to fly for 90 minutes at normal cruising fuel consumption, whichever is less.
( b ) No person may dispatch a nonturbine or turbo-propeller-powered airplane to an airport for which an alternate is not specified under § 121.621(a)(2), unless it has enough fuel, considering wind and forecast weather conditions, to fly to that airport and thereafter to fly for three hours at normal cruising fuel consumption.
(LOGO)

Norwest Mortgage, Inc.
Home Campus
Des Moines, IA 50328
515/221- 7300

Management Assertion

As of, and for the year ended December 31, 1998,  Norwest  Mortgage  Banking has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  Uniform  Single  Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers.  As of, and for the same period,  Norwest Mortgage
Banking had in effect a fidelity bond along with an errors and omissions  policy
in the amounts of $100 million and $20 million, respectively.

Mark C. Oman
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
January 19, 1999
Date

Robert K. Chapman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
January 19, 1999
Date

Mike Heid
Executive Vice President Loan Servicing
January 19, 1999
Date
§ 703.5 Discretionary control over investments and investment advisers. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a Federal credit union must retain discretionary control over its purchase and sale of investments. A Federal credit union has not delegated discretionary control to an investment adviser when the Federal credit union reviews all recommendations from investment advisers and is required to authorize a recommended purchase or sale transaction before its execution.
( b ) ( 1 ) A Federal credit union may delegate discretionary control over the purchase and sale of investments to a person other than a Federal credit union official or employee: ( i ) Provided the person is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b); and
( ii ) In an amount up to 100 percent of its net worth in the aggregate at the time of delegation.
( 2 ) At least annually, the Federal credit union must adjust the amount of funds held under discretionary control to comply with the 100 percent of net worth cap. The Federal credit union's board of directors must receive notice as soon as possible, but no later than the next regularly scheduled board meeting, of the amount exceeding the net worth cap and notify in writing the appropriate regional director within 5 days after the board meeting. The credit union must develop a plan to comply with the cap within a reasonable period of time.
( 3 ) Before transacting business with an investment adviser, a Federal credit union must analyze his or her background and information available from State or Federal securities regulators, including any enforcement actions against the adviser, associated personnel, and the firm for which the adviser works.
( c ) A Federal credit union may not compensate an investment adviser with discretionary control over the purchase and sale of investments on a per transaction basis or based on capital gains, capital appreciation, net income, performance relative to an index, or any other incentive basis.
( d ) A Federal credit union must obtain a report from its investment adviser at least monthly that details the investments under the adviser's control and their performance.