alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, David Bolink, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-Q  of  Chell  Group
Corporation. ("Chell");

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of Chell
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. As the  sole  certifying  officer,  I am  responsible  for  establishing  and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Chell and have:

      a.  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
      disclosure  controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision,
      to ensure  that  material  information  relating to Chell,  including  its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

      b.  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  Chell's  disclosure   controls  and
      procedures and presented in this quarterly  report our  conclusions  about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation;

      c.  disclosed in this report any change in Chell's  internal  control over
      financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  Chell's  most recent  fiscal
      quarter  that  has  materially  affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to
      materially affect, Chell's internal control over financial reporting;

5. As the sole certifying  officer,  I have  disclosed,  based on my most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Chell's auditors and
the audit committee of Chell's board of directors:

      a. all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
      operation  of  internal   control  over  financial   reporting  which  are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect Chell's ability to record,  process,
      summarize and report financial information; and

      b. any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees who have a  significant  role in Chell's  internal  control over
      financial reporting.

DATE: November 30, 2004


                              By: /s/ David Bolink
                                  ---------------------------------
                                  DAVID BOLINK
                                  CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER


                                      -22-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                    Canadian dollars
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       FEB-28-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1.5074
<CASH>                                 780,712
<SECURITIES>                         1,948,507
<RECEIVABLES>                        3,640,997
<ALLOWANCES>                            63,000
<INVENTORY>                            277,005
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     7,359,138
<PP&E>                               5,531,586
<DEPRECIATION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      16,448,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                2,750,621
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                             10,917
<COMMON>                               162,484
<OTHER-SE>                          11,092,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        16,448,616
<SALES>                              7,163,204
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     7,163,204
<CGS>                                2,462,591
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        2,462,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        34,451
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      89,208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        495,938
<INCOME-TAX>                           281,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    233,176
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                           233,176
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.08
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24500-24501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

National Park Service


National Preservation Technology and Training Board: Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. Appendix (1988), that the National Preservation 
Technology and Training Board will meet on May 22, 2000, in Santa Fe, 
New Mexico.
    The Board was established by Congress to provide leadership, policy 
advice, and professional oversight to the National Center for 
Preservation Technology and Training, as required under the National 
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470).
    The Board will meet in the DeVargas room of the Hotel St. Francis, 
201 Don Gasper Avenue, Santa Fe, New Mexico. Matters to be discussed 
will include, officer and committee reports; consideration of present 
and future NCPTT programs; consideration of NCPTT mission and long-
range plan, assess the accomplishment of the board's first six years; 
and the election of officers for two-year terms.
    Monday, May 22 the meeting will start at 8:30 a.m. and end at 5 
p.m. The meeting will be open to the public. However, facilities and 
space for accommodating members of the public are limited and persons 
will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. Any member of 
the public may file a written statement concerning the matters to be 
discussed with Dr. Elizabeth A. Lyon, Chair, National

[[Page 24501]]

Preservation Technology and Training Board, P.O. Box 1269, Flowery 
Branch, Georgia 30542.
    Persons wishing more information concerning this meeting, or who 
wish to submit written statements, may do so by contacting Mr. E. 
Blaine Cliver, Chief, HABS/HAER, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, 
NW, Washington, DC 20240, telephone: (202) 343-9573. Draft summary 
minutes of the meeting will be available for public inspection about 
eight weeks after the meeting at the office of the Preservation 
Assistance Division, Suite 200, 800 North Capitol Street, Washington, 
DC.

    Dated: April 20, 2000.
E. Blaine Cliver,
Chief, HABS/HAER, Designated Federal Official, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 00-10376 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
#### Billy A. PUTERBAUGH *v.*Fern PUTERBAUGH

5-6213

491 S.W. 2d 386

Opinion delivered March 12, 1973

*Smith, Williams, Friday, Eldridge ir Clark,*by: *Frederick S. Ussery, Ronnie A. Phillips*and *L. Weens Trussell,*for appellant.

*Jack L. Lessenberry,*for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellant Billy A. Puterbaugh contends that an order for temporary support, maintenance and attorney’s fees for his wife, appellee Fern Puterbaugh, should have been dismissed because his wife was not a resident of Pulaski County at the time she filed her complaint on August 16, 1972.

Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-1204 (Repl. 1962), provides that divorce proceedings shall be in the county where the complainant resides.

This record comes to us only upon the testimony of appellee to the éffect that she intends to reside and be a resident of Pulaski County. Appellant relies upon *McLaughlin*v. *McLaughlin,*193 Ark. 207, 99 S.W. 2d 571 (1936), to support his position that the Pulaski Chancery Court had no jurisdiction. Here, however, the proof on the part of appellee shows that she lived and worked as a legal secretary in Little Rock from 1962 to 1967, shortly before her marriage in February 1968. Also that she was without funds with which to support herself at the time of separation and that she came to *61Little Rock to seek employment. In the *McLaughlin*case, the proof was to the effect that the wife moved to Little Rock for the sole purpose of filing for a divorce.

From a review of the record upon appellee’s testimony alone, we cannot say that the chancellor’s ruling is contrary to a preponderance of the evidence.

Affirmed.

George Rose Smith, J., concur.

Harris, C. J. and Holt, J., not participating.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3326

To extend the King Range National Conservation Area boundary in the 

State of California to include the Mill Creek, Squaw Creek, and Indian 

Creek Forests. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16, 2003

Mr. THOMPSON of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To extend the King Range National Conservation Area 

boundary in the State of California to include the Mill 

Creek, Squaw Creek, and Indian Creek Forests.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘King Range National 

5 Conservation Area Boundary Extension Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) The public lands within the King Range 

9 National Conservation Area, California, are a unique 
2

•HR 3326 IH 

1 public resource encompassing a spectacular meeting 

2 of land and sea. 

3 (2) The Mill Creek, Squaw Creek, and Indian 

4 Creek Forests are located adjacent to the King 

5 Range National Conservation Area and have long 

6 been recognized as critical components of the 

7 Mattole River watershed. 

8 (3) The Mill Creek Forest comprises approxi9 mately 2,514 acres of public land, the Squaw Creek 

10 Forest comprises approximately 400 acres of public 

11 land, and the Indian Creek Forest comprises ap12 proximately 304 acres of public land. Each of the 

13 forests is administered by the Bureau of Land Man14 agement, and contains significant stands of old15 growth Douglas fir that support habitat for threat16 ened species and endangered species, including the 

17 northern spotted owl, red-tailed frog, and Olympic 

18 salamander. 

19 (4) The linkage of the Mill Creek, Squaw 

20 Creek, and Indian Creek Forests to the King Range 

21 National Conservation Area will enhance outdoor 

22 recreational opportunities in the northern portion of 

23 the King Range and the coastal section of the 

24 Mattole River. 
3

•HR 3326 IH 

1 (5) Extending the King Range boundary to in2 clude the Mill Creek, Squaw Creek, and Indian 

3 Creek Forests will also enhance management of the 

4 natural resources of the area by connecting the 

5 headwaters of Mill Creek to the Mattole River. 

6 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF KING RANGE NATIONAL CONSERVA7 TION AREA BOUNDARY. 

8 Section 9 of the Act of October 21, 1970 (84 Stat. 

9 1067), is amended by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(d) In addition to the lands described in subsections 

11 (a) and (c), there are hereby added to the King Range 

12 National Conservation Area the lands identified as the 

13 Mill Creek, Squaw Creek, and Indian Creek proposed ex14 tensions on the map entitled ‘King Range National Con15 servation Area Boundary Extension Act of 2003’, dated 

16 October 2, 2003.’’.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES v. MEMPHIS COTTON OIL CO.

[75 C.Cls. 195; 288 U.S. 62]

*763Mr. Justice Cardozo

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court.
###### Editorial Note on Part 741

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 741 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 741.226 Subordinated Debt.

Any credit union that is insured, or that makes application for insurance, pursuant to title II of the Act must follow the requirements of subpart D of part 702 of this chapter before it may issue Subordinated Debt, as that term is defined in § 702.402 of this chapter, and to the extent not inconsistent with applicable state law and regulation.

[86 FR 11085, Feb. 23, 2021]
# Official Journal C 253/26 O

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 253 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5026 October 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 253

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5026 October 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Council |
| 2007/C 253/01 | Ninth annual report according to operative provision 8 of the European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Exports | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Council

2007/C 253/01

Ninth annual report according to operative provision 8 of the European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Exports

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

---------------------------------------------------------------

In re

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

 as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, 

et al.,

Debtors.

x

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

PROMESA 

Title III

Case No. 17-BK-3283 (LTS)

(Jointly Administered)

---------------------------------------------------------------

In re

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

 as representative of

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER 

AUTHORITY (PREPA)

Debtor.

---------------------------------------------------------------

x

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

x

PROMESA 

Title III

Case No. 17-BK-04780 (LTS)

Court Filing Relates Only to PREPA

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

I hereby certify that Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, as administrative agent for certain 

lenders (hereafter “Scotiabank”), in accordance with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9014(b), Fed. R. Bankr. P. 

7004(b), and the Court’s Third Amended Notice, Case Management and Administrative 

Procedures Order (Docket No. 1512 of Case No. 17-03283 (LTS)) (the “CMP Order”), sent a 

true and exact copy of the documents titled: (i) Response and Limited Objection of Scotiabank de 

Puerto Rico, as Administrative Agent, to Urgent Motion for Entry of an Interim Order Authorizing 

Postpetition Secured Financing; (ii) Objection of Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, as Administrative Agent, 

to Oversight Board’s Urgent Motion to Clarify the Scope of the Interim Hearing on the Financing 

Motion; (iii) Informative Motion of Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, as Administrative Agent, regarding 

February 7-8, 2018 Hearing at 9:30 A.M. (AST); and (iv) Motion of Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, as 

Administrative Agent, for Leave to File Spanish Document and to File Certified English Translation 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2362 Filed:02/02/18 Entered:02/02/18 11:55:24 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

by February 5, 2018, all filed on February 1, 2018 (Dockets No. 572, 573, 575, and 590 of Case 

No. 17-04780 (LTS)), by electronic mail upon all the parties listed in the Master Service List

on FEBRUARY 1

ST, 2018, and was sent by U.S. mail on FEBRUARY 2ND, 2018 upon all the 

Standard Parties listed in the CMP Order.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 2

nd day of February, 2018.

WE HEREBY CERTIFY that on this same date, we electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing 

to all CM/ECF participants in this case. 

MCCONNELL VALDÉS LLC

Attorneys for Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, as 

Administrative Agent

270 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 7

Hato Rey, Puerto Rico 00918

PO Box 364225

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936-4225

Telephone: 787-250-5604

Facsimile: 787-759-9225

By: s/Antonio A. Arias

Antonio A. Arias

USDC-PR No. 204906

aaa@mcvpr.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2362 Filed:02/02/18 Entered:02/02/18 11:55:24 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Emory V. Anderson, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 ofAdeza Biomedical Corporation;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
 (b)  [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];
 (c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
 (d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and
 (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Emory V. AndersonEmory V. Anderson
#### Joseph Yates Porter, Junior, *Appellant,*v. Alice Maloney Porter, *Appellee.*

Decision Filed April 28, 1923.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County; N Pierre Branning, Judge.

*W. Hunt Harris,*for Appellant;

*Wm. H. Malone,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered,- ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

All concur.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 6 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 7 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 8 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 9 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 10 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 11 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 12 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 13 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 14 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 15 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 16 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 17 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 18 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 19 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 20 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 21 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 22 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 23 of 24
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22993 Filed:12/06/22 Entered:12/06/22 17:57:31 Desc: Main

Document Page 24 of 24