alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.1**
I, Pasquale Natuzzi*,*certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Natuzzi S.p.A.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant andhave:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the company’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.          /s/ Pasquale Natuzzi Pasquale Natuzzi  Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3690 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3690

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 2 West Main Street in Batavia, New York, as the ``Barber Conable Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2 West 
Main Street in Batavia, New York, shall be known and designated as the 
``Barber Conable Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Barber Conable Post Office 
Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 707.6 Periodic statement disclosures. ( a ) *Rule when statement and crediting periods vary.* In making the disclosures described in paragraph (b) of this section, credit unions that calculate and credit dividends for a period other than the statement period, such as the dividend period, may calculate and disclose the annual percentage yield earned and amount of dividends earned based on that period rather than the statement period. The information in paragraph (b)(4) shall be stated for that period as well as for the statement period.
( b ) *Statement disclosures.* If a credit union mails or delivers a periodic statement, the statement shall include the following disclosures: ( 1 ) *Annual percentage yield earned.* The “annual percentage yield earned,” using that term as calculated according to the rules in appendix A of this part.
( 2 ) *Amount of dividends.* The dollar amount of dividends earned (accrued or paid and credited) on the account. The dollar amount of any extraordinary dividends earned during the statement period shall be shown as a separate figure.
( 3 ) *Fees imposed.* Fees required to be disclosed under § 707.4(b)(4) of this part that were debited from the account during the statement period. The fees must be itemized by type and dollar amounts. Except as provided in § 707.11(a)(1) of this part, when fees of the same type are imposed more than once in a statement period, a credit union may itemize each fee separately or group the fees together and disclose a total dollar amount for all fees of that type.
( 4 ) *Length of period.* The total number of days in the statement period, or the beginning and ending dates of the period.
( 5 ) *Aggregate fee disclosure.* If applicable, the total overdraft and returned item fees required to be disclosed by § 707.11(a).
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3133-0134) [58 FR 50445, Sept. 27, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 59899, Nov. 21, 1994; 61 FR 114, Jan. 3, 1996; 64 FR 66356, Nov. 26, 1999; 66 FR 33163, June 21, 2001; 70 FR 72898, Dec. 8, 2005; 75 FR 47175, Aug. 5, 2010]
#### James Platt and Elijah Bellamy, *Plaintiffs in*Error, v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion Filed March. 5, 1913.

In a conviction for capital punishment where the evidence as to the identity of the accused is not satisfactory, a new trial should be granted.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Clay County.

Judgment reversed.

*A. E.*Bell, and *BoM. W.*Davis, for Plaintiffs in Error;

*T. F. West, Attorney General,*and *G. O.*A.ndreios, for the State.

Whitfield, J.

The plaintiffs in error, were convicted of murder in the first degree, and on writ of error the only contention is the insufficiency of the evidence. There were no eye-witnesses to the homicide, and the identity of the accused is the essential issue. After a most careful consideration of the evidence the court is of opinion that while there is some evidence to identify the defendants as being the guilty parties, the testimony taken as a whole, is far from being satisfactory or convincing, and as human life is involved, it is considered just and right that another jury should pass upon the issues made. The judgment, therefore, is reversed and a new trial granted.

Shackleford, C. J., and Taylor, Cockrell and Hock-er, J. J., concur.
§ 1207.103 Designations of responsible officials. ( a ) *Designated Agency Ethics Official.* The General Counsel of NASA is the Designated Agency Ethics Official and is delegated the authority to coordinate and manage NASA's ethics program as set forth in 5 CFR 2638.203.
( b ) *Alternate Designated Agency Ethics Official.* The Associate General Counsel (General) is the Alternate Designated Agency Ethics Official.
( c ) *Deputy Ethics Officials.* The following officials are designated as Deputy Ethics Officials: ( 1 ) The Deputy General Counsel;
( 2 ) The Associate General Counsel (General);
( 3 ) The Senior Ethics Attorney assigned to the Associate General Counsel (General); and
( 4 ) The Chief Counsel at each NASA Center and Component Facility.
( d ) *Agency Designee.* As used in 5 CFR part 2635, the term “Agency Designee” refers to the following: ( 1 ) For employees at NASA Headquarters, or for matters affecting employees Agencywide, the Associate Deputy Administrator, the Designated Agency Ethics Official, the Alternate Designated Agency Ethics Official, or the Chief of Staff; and
( 2 ) For Center employees, the Center Director, who may delegate specific responsibilities of the Agency Designee to the Center Chief Counsel or to another official who reports directly to the Center Director.
( e ) *Cross-references.* For regulations on the appointment, responsibilities, and authority of the Designated Agency Ethics Official, Alternate Designated Agency Ethics Official, and Deputy Ethics Officials, see 5 CFR part 2638. For the responsibilities of the Agency Designee, see 5 CFR part 2635.
[66 FR 59138, Nov. 27, 2001]
# Official Journal C 301/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.301.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 301 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5617 October 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.301.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 301

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5617 October 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 301/01 | Communication from the Commission — Notification of evidence of formal qualifications — Directive 2005/36/EC on recognition of professional qualifications (Annex V) (1) | 1 |
| 2013/C 301/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.7040 — CVC/Domestic & General Group Holdings) (1) | 10 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 301/01

Communication from the Commission — Notification of evidence of formal qualifications — Directive 2005/36/EC on recognition of professional qualifications (Annex V) (1)

1

2013/C 301/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.7040 — CVC/Domestic & General Group Holdings) (1)

10

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 301/03 | Euro exchange rates | 11 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 301/03

Euro exchange rates

11

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 301/04 | Call for applications for the selection of an expert following the resignation of a member of the Commission stakeholder expert group on public procurement | 12 |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2013/C 301/05 | Notice of open competition | 15 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 301/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7071 — Telenor/Schibsted/Singapore Press Holdings/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 16 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2013/C 301/04

Call for applications for the selection of an expert following the resignation of a member of the Commission stakeholder expert group on public procurement

12

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2013/C 301/05

Notice of open competition

15

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2013/C 301/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7071 — Telenor/Schibsted/Singapore Press Holdings/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

16

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the accompanying Annual Report of TechLite, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"),
I, J.D. Arvidson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to
my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  April  14,  2004

                                  /s/  J.D.  Arvidson
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  J.D.  Arvidson
                                  Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-KSB  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.










                                                                      Exhibit 32
¤£

¦§ ̈

Bundy Road

M

ts1

US 312

3

ht6

e

2

bbiN

4I-9

ke

t7 h

ht

e

8

r

2

2

 ylF C

Bundy Island Special 

Recreation Management Area

Alternative B

Map 101

Wyoming

T

3

N

Location Map

Montana

Ü

Billings 

Field 

Office

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Map scale 1:24,000

Miles

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

94

R30E

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Legend

Bundy Island SRMA

Roads

Railroads

Streams

Bureau of Land Management

Yellowstone River

Private 

Public Lands Survey System

Pompeys P i llar Cr

ee k

e r

o w s t o n e R i v

Y e l l

312

Interstate
BILL OF EXCEPTIONS.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

July, 1896.]

Smith, Swing and Cox, JJ.

#### State of Ohio ex rel. v. Judge Evans.

1. Construction or Statutes Redating to Bide oe Exceptions.

The statutes relating to a bill of exceptions are to be strictly construed, and a bill when presented must be complete and proper in form.

2. Biee When Presented Must be Compeete.

The presentation of a bill of exceptions to opposing counsel containing all of the evidence, but with the exhibits unattached and enclosed in a separate envelope, is not a compliance with the statute, and need not be accepted by opposing counsel.

Swing, J., Cox, J.,

concurring:

The facts in this case show that on the last day on which the bill of exceptions could be presented to opposing counsel, plaintiff's attorney came to the office of defendant’s attorney and submitted to the attorney the oral testimony, written out in proper form, and also offered to him *340an envelope containing numerous exhibits which had been offered in evidence in the case, but which exhibits were in no manner attached to the bill of exceptions. Defendant’s attorney refused to accept the bill of exceptions, on the ground that the bill was not a complete bill of exceptions, whereupon plaintiff’s counsel said he would attach the exhibits and took the written testimony and the exhibits, and on the following day, which was on the forty-first day after the exception was taken, presented to defendant’s counsel the bill of exceptions in controversy ; which bill, it is admitted, is in proper form, containing all the oral testimony and written evidence presented at the trial. This bill the defendant’s counsel refused to receive on the ground that it was not presented within the time required by law, and the trial judge refuses to sign it for the same reason.

*A. C. Shattucky*for the Writ.

*Thomas L. Michie, Contra.*

This is a suit in mandamus to require the judge to sign the bill.

We are of the opinion that the judge was right in refusing to sign the bill. We think the bill of exceptions required to be presented to ■ opposing counsel should be a bill of exceptions *complete in form.*If purporting to contain all the evidence, it should contain in the form of a bill of exceptions all the evidence which counsel presenting the bill claimed the evidence to be. It does not follow that the bill presented to counsel for examination should in fact contain all the evidence for opposing counsel or the judge might add to *the bill*certain items of evidence omitted, or might strike from it certain matters improperly there; but this fact does not relieve the counsel from preparing and presenting to opposing counsel within the time provided by law, a bill of exceptions complete and proper in form in that it shall contain, if it purports to contain all the evidence, all that he claims to be the evidence and not a part merely.

This we regard as a very strict and technical holding, but our supreme court has always construed the statutes relating to bills of exceptions strictly. Writ refused.

Judge Smith excepts to this ruling of the court on the ground that 1m thinks there was a substantial compliance with the law.
H. R. 3249

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To extend the term of the Forest Counties Payments Committee.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TERM OF FOREST COUNTIES PAYMENTS

COMMITTEE.

Effective as of October 11, 2003, section 320(e) of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,

2001 (Public Law 106–291; 114 Stat. 994; 16 U.S.C. 500 note),

is amended by striking ‘‘three years after the date of the enactment

of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘on September 30, 2007’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT B

SUMMARY OF FTI CONSULTING, INC. HOURS WORKED AND FEES INCURRED BY PROFESSIONAL BY LOCATION

FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1, 2022 TO JANUARY 31, 2023

Mainland On-island Total

Professional Position

Blended 

Billing Rate Hours Fees Hours Fees

Total

Hours

Total

Fees

Gumbs, Sean Senior Managing Director $ 1,200 0.5 $ 600.00 - $ - 0.5 $ 600.00

Sombuntham, Natalie Senior Director 925 19.0 17,575.00 - - 19.0 17,575.00

Hellmund-Mora, Marili Manager 325 1.1 357.50 - - 1.1 357.50

SUBTOTAL 20.6 $ 18,532.50 - $ - 20.6 $ 18,532.50

Less: 50% discount for non-working travel time - - -

GRAND TOTAL $ 18,532.50 $ - $ 18,532.50

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23803-2 Filed:03/15/23 Entered:03/15/23 08:21:22 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 1 of 1
#### § 117.27 Consecutive nighttime operations.

A certificate holder may schedule and a flightcrew member may accept up to five consecutive flight duty periods that infringe on the window of circadian low if the certificate holder provides the flightcrew member with an opportunity to rest in a suitable accommodation during each of the consecutive nighttime flight duty periods. The rest opportunity must be at least 2 hours, measured from the time that the flightcrew member reaches the suitable accommodation, and must comply with the conditions specified in § 117.15(a), (c), (d), and (e). Otherwise, no certificate holder may schedule and no flightcrew member may accept more than three consecutive flight duty periods that infringe on the window of circadian low. For purposes of this section, any split duty rest that is provided in accordance with § 117.15 counts as part of a flight duty period.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 24874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10498]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[COTP San Juan 00-013]
RIN 2115-AA97


Safety Zone Regulations; San Juan Harbor, San Juan, Puerto Rico

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Temporary final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard published a temporary rule on March 20, 2000, 
creating a safety zone around the grounded cement carrier M/V SERGO 
ZAKARIADZE. The section number in that rule was incorrect. This 
document changes the section number from 165.T07-013 to 165.T07-037.

DATES: This section was effective at 7 a.m. on March 1, 2000 and 
terminated at 7 a.m. on March 22, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander Lefevers at Coast 
Guard Marine Safety Office San Juan, Puerto Rico, tel: (787) 706-2444.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background and Purpose

    The Coast Guard published a temporary safety zone in the Federal 
Register on March 20, 2000, (65 FR 14864), adding temporary section 
165.T07-013.

Need for Correction

    As published, that section number was incorrect. That section 
number is assigned to a current CFR section. This document corrects the 
section number.

Correction of Publication

    In rule FR Doc. 00-6684 published on March 20, 2000 (65 FR 14864) 
make the following correction. On page 14865, in the first column, on 
lines 6 and 8, change the section number of the temporary safety zone 
to read Sec. 165.T07-037.

J. Servidio,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, San Juan, Puerto 
Rico.
[FR Doc. 00-10498 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 11

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

#### § 11.41 Who may file comments?

Anyone may file written comments about proposals and final rules that request public comments.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General ElectricCapital Services, Inc. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "report"), we, Dennis D. Dammerman and James A. Parke, Chairmanof the Board and Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of theregistrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to our knowledge:

| (1)
The report fully complies with the requirements of section    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 
(2)
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in    all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of    the registrant.
 

    Date: October 26, 2004
/s/
Dennis D. Dammerman
Dennis D. Dammerman    Chairman of the Board 
 

 

/s/
James A. Parke
James A. Parke    Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|