alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                             | At                 |       |
|----------------------------------|--------------------|------------|
|                             | September      30, |       | December      31, |   | September      30, |   |
|                             | 2009(a)            |       | 2008  |   | 2008  |   |
|                             |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Managed                          |               | 3.01  | % |   | 2.17  | % |   | 1.61  | % |
| Off-book                         |               | 2.51  |   |   | 1.20  |   |   | 0.92  |   |
| On-book                          |               | 3.09  |   |   | 2.34  |   |   | 1.75  |   |
|                             |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                             |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Consumer                         |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                             |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                             | At                 |       |
|                             | September      30, |       | December      31, |   | September      30, |   |
|                             | 2009(a)            |       | 2008  |   | 2008  |   |
|                             |               |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Managed                          |               | 8.80  | % |   | 7.43  | % |   | 6.38  | % |
|     U.S.     |               | 7.31  |   |   | 7.14  |   |   | 6.17  |   |
|     Non-U.S. |               | 9.42  |   |   | 7.57  |   |   | 6.47  |   |
| Off-book                         |               | 6.85  |   |   | 8.24  |   |   | 7.21  |   |
|     U.S.     |               | 6.85  |   |   | 8.24  |   |   | 7.21  |   |
|     Non-U.S. |               | (b)        |   |   | (b) |   |   | (b) |   |
| On-book                          |               | 9.12  |   |   | 7.31  |   |   | 6.29  |   |
|     U.S.     |               | 7.74  |   |   | 6.39  |   |   | 5.58  |   |
|     Non-U.S. |               | 9.42  |   |   | 7.57  |   |   | 6.47  |   |

| (a)   | Subject      to update. |
|-----------------|-------------------------|

| (b)   | Not      applicable. |
|-----------------|----------------------|

----

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 4.6

                        [BIOMUNE CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]

                                  June 14, 2001


Mr. Jacob J. Guth
1245 Friendship Lane
Upper Black Eddy, PA 18972

Dear Jacob:

    This letter sets forth the terms whereby Biomune Systems, Inc., a Nevada
corporation ("Biomune"), agrees to retain Jacob J. Guth to act as consultant and
advisor to Biomune in the area of adhesives and seed coatings. In exchange for
your services, Biomune shall deliver to you 21,800 shares of Common Stock of
Biomune, par value $0.0001 per share, (the "Shares"), which will be duly
authorized, legally and validly issued and outstanding, fully paid,
non-assessable and registered pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. The Shares will be issued to you upon an effective registration
statement and will be adjusted to reflect the agreed to value.

    In exchange for the Shares, you shall provide to Biomune advice and
direction with respect to a variety of research, along with any other activities
or services requested by Biomune relating to adhesives and feed coating
activities.

    If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding of our agreement,
please sign where indicated below and deliver a copy of this letter as provided
for herein, whereupon this letter shall represent a binding agreement between
us.

                                                  Very truly yours,

                                                  BIOMUNE SYSTEMS, INC.


                                                  By:
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Name: Larry Koskan
                                                     Title: President and CEO

Accepted and agreed to
as of the date first
above written:

---------------------------------
Jacob J. Guth
#### Long *v.*The State.

No. 8572.

August 10, 1932.

Atkinson, J.

1. “There being some direct evidence on all the essential elements of the crime charged, the failure of the judge to charge the jury on the law of circumstantial evidence does not furnish cause for a new trial.” *Wilson*v. *State,*152 *Ga.*337 (110 S. E. 8).

2. Where two persons are jointly indicted for murder, each may be convicted upon evidence showing that he was either the actual perpetrator of the crime or was present aiding and abetting' the other in its commission. Fut*ch*v. *State,*137 *Ga.*75 (3) (72 S. E. 911).

3. Although charged with murder as principal in the first degree, there being direct evidence tending to establish all the essential elements of that crime as principal in the second degree, the conviction of the defendant did not depend entirely on circumstantial evidence; and consequently the failure of the judge without request to charge on the law of circumstantial evidence does not furnish cause for a reversal. The case differs on its facts from *Wearner*v. *State,*135 *Ga.*317 (69 S. E. 488), in which the direct evidence failed to connect the defendants with the crime.

4. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*275
      *W. I. Geer*and *P. Z. Geer,*for plaintiff in error.

*George M. Napier, attorney-general, B. T. Gasiellow, solicitor-general, T. B. Gress, assistant attorney-general,*and *Bond Almand,*contra.
§ 338.9 Mortgage lending of a controlled entity. Any bank which refers any applicants to a controlled entity and which purchases any covered loan as defined in Regulation C of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (12 CFR part 1003) originated by the controlled entity, as a condition to transacting any business with the controlled entity, shall require the controlled entity to enter into a written agreement with the bank. The written agreement shall provide that the entity shall: ( a ) Comply with the requirements of §§ 338.3, 338.4, and 338.7, and, if otherwise subject to Regulation C of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (12 CFR part 1003), § 338.8;
( b ) Open its books and records to examination by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; and
( c ) Comply with all instructions and orders issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation with respect to its home loan practices.
(LOGO)

National City Mortgage Co.
3232 Newmark Drive
Miamisburg, Ohio 45342
Telephone (937) 436-3025

Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 1820
Dayton, Ohio 45401-1820

Management's Assertion on Compliance with
Minimum Servicing Standards Set Forth in the
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

Report of Management

As a member of management of National City Mortgage Co. (NCM),  I am responsible
for complying with the minimum servicing  standards as set forth in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers (USAP). I am also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective
internal  control over  compliance  with these  standards.  I have  performed an
evaluation of NCM's compliance with the minimum servicing standards as set forth
in the USAP as of December  31, 1998 and for the year then ended.  Based on this
evaluation, I assert that during the year ended December 31, 1998, NCM complied,
in all material aspects,  with the minimum servicing  standards set forth in the
USAP.

As of and for this same period,  NCM had in effect a fidelity bond policy in the
amount of $50  million and an errors and  omissions  policy in the amount of $40
million.

T. Jackson Case Jr. Sr. Vice President

January 29, 1999

No one Cares More!
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6979

ROBERT A. CUFFEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR ODIMSE, Medical Director; MARY TAKNOWSKI, Medical Department Head; PHYLLIS PATTSON, Nurse; ERIC L. BOOKER, Correctional Officer, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-70-1) Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 26, 2001 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert A. Cuffee, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Robert A. Cuffee appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) for failure to pay a filing fee or seek leave toproceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Cuffee’s motion to compel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cuffee v. Odimse , No. CA-01-70-1 (E.D. Va. May 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|   | 1. | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ O’Neil Nalavadi                                         |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
| O’Neil      Nalavadi                                        |
| Senior      Vice President                                        |
| Chief      Financial Officerand      Principal Accounting Officer |
|                                                              |
| November      30, 2010                                            |

----
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24229 Filed:05/15/23 Entered:05/18/23 12:21:21 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24156 Filed:05/05/23 Entered:05/08/23 09:24:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24156 Filed:05/05/23 Entered:05/08/23 09:24:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24156 Filed:05/05/23 Entered:05/08/23 09:24:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24156 Filed:05/05/23 Entered:05/08/23 09:24:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24156 Filed:05/05/23 Entered:05/08/23 09:24:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 5
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 351

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a maximum term of 

supervised release of life for sex offenders. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2003

Mr. CUNNINGHAM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a 

maximum term of supervised release of life for sex offenders.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lifetime Consequences 

5 for Sex Offenders Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SUPERVISED RELEASE TERM FOR SEX OFFENDERS. 

7 Section 3583 of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(k) SUPERVISED RELEASE TERMS FOR SEX OF10 FENDERS.—Notwithstanding subsection (b), the author-
2

•HR 351 IH 

1 ized term of supervised release for any offense under chap2 ter 109a, 110, 117, or section 1591 is any term of years 

3 or life.’’.

Æ
H. R. 3537

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 185 State

Street in Manhattan, Illinois, as the ‘‘Army Pvt. Shawn Pahnke Manhattan Post

Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

185 State Street in Manhattan, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Army Pvt. Shawn Pahnke Manhattan Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Army Pvt.

Shawn Pahnke Manhattan Post Office’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
DESCRIPTION OF THE CHAIRMAN’S MARK 

OF H.J. Res. 43, 

“A JOINT RESOLUTION INCREASING THE STATUTORY LIMIT ON 

THE PUBLIC DEBT” 

Scheduled for Markup 

by the 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE 

on September 12, 2007 

Prepared by the Staff 

of the 

JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION 

 

September 10, 2007 

JCX-66-07 
i 

CONTENTS 

Page

INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 

A. Increase in Statutory Limit............................................................................................... 2 
1 

INTRODUCTION 

The Senate Committee on Finance has scheduled a markup of H.J. Res. 43, “A Joint 

Resolution Increasing the Statutory Limit on the Public Debt.” This document,1 prepared by the 

staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, provides a description of the Chairman’s Mark of H. J. 

Res. 43. 

 1

 This document may be cited as follows: Joint Committee on Taxation, Description of the 

Chairman’s Mark of H.J. Res. 43, “Joint Resolution Increasing the Statutory Limit on the Public Debt”

(JCX-66-07), September 10, 2007. This document can be found on our website at www.house.gov/jct. 
2 

A. Increase in Statutory Limit 

Present Law and Background

The statutory limit on the public debt currently is $8.965 trillion. It was set at this level 

in P.L. 109-182, enacted into law on March 20, 2006. It is projected that the current debt limit 

will be reached in early October 2007. 

House Rule 27 provides that when the Conference report on the Budget Resolution is 

adopted, the House is deemed to have passed a joint resolution causing the debt limit to increase 

by a specified amount. For the Conference Report on the Budget Resolution passed this year, 

that amount is $850 billion. This amount would increase the debt limit to $9.815 trillion. 

Description of Proposal

The proposal would concur with the joint resolution and increase the statutory limit on 

the public debt by $850 billion to $9.815 trillion. 

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective on the date of enactment.
Order entered August 6, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00219-CR

ANDREW SCOTT LOTT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-40454-M

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the State’s August 4, 2014 motion for extension of time to file the 

State’s amended brief. The Court also GRANTS the State’s August 4, 2014 motion for leave to 

file brief exceeding the word count limit.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the State’s amended brief tendered as of the 

date of this order.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to strike the State’s brief filed on June 11, 2014.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
#### CLARENCE V. LEE v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. M-318.

Decided November 14, 1932]

*284
      *Mr. John W. Price*for the plaintiíf. *Mr. Rees B. Gillespie*was on the brief.

*Mr. M. O.*Masterson, with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General Charles B.*R'iCgg, for the defendant.

*285Williams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiff, a lieutenant in the United States Navy, senior grade, sues to recover rental and subsistence allowances on account of a dependent mother, provided in section 4, of the act of June 10,1922, 42 Stat. 625:

> *“*Sec. 4. That the term ‘ dependent ’ as used in the succeeding sections of this act shall include at all times and in all places a lawful wife and unmarried children under twenty-one years of age. It shall also include the mother of the officer providing she is in fact dependent on him for her chief support.”

The court has construed this section of the statute in numerous cases during recent years. We see no reason to modify or change the rule we have consistently announced in these cases as to what constitutes the dependency of a mother within the meaning of the statute. Applying the rule uniformly announced in these cases to the facts disclosed in the findings the plaintiff is entitled to the increased allowances, provided for an officer of his rank, during the period of the claim.

The entry of judgment, however, will await the coming in of a report from the General Accounting Office of the amount due from the date of the beginning of the claim, July 15, 1927, to March 4, 1932, the last date on? which dependence is shown. It is so ordered.

Whalet, *Judge;*Littleton-, *Judge;*Greek-, *Judge;*and Booth, *Ohief Justice,*concur.
Active Oil Fields 

within the 

Billings Field Office 

Planning Area

0 2 4 8 12 16 20

Miles

Map 48

Roundup Harlowton

^

^

T7N

Pompeys Pillar

^

T Big Timber 1 ^ N Billings ^ T2 Columbus S ^

Bridger

^

T8S

R18E R29E Montana

R104W R93W

T Wyoming 57N

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Legend

Map scale 1:900,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Oil & Gas Field

Interstate

Highway

^ Towns

Public Lands Survey System
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Graymatters [electronic resource].**
 
V.1|V.2
 
SuDoc Number:PR 44.8:B 52/G 79/VOL.1-2
Item Number:0851-J-12 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000968494
 
July 12, 2018
Exhibit 99.22





CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON








Golden Star Resources Ltd.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Golden Star Resources Ltd.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





I hereby consent to (i) being named and identified as a “qualified person” in connection with the following documents, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Form 40-F”) of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) to which this consent relates: (A) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016, (B) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2016, (C) the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on a Feasibility Study of the Prestea Underground Gold Project in Ghana" effective date November 3, 2015 and filed on January 22, 2016, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from such documents in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-211926, 333-175542, 333-169047, 333-118958, 333-105821 and 333-105820), as amended, and Registration Statement No. 333-196906 on Form F-10, as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.











/s/ Kris Czajewski


Kris Czajewski





March 30, 2017
Exhibit 99.21





CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON








Golden Star Resources Ltd.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Golden Star Resources Ltd.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





I hereby consent to (i) being named and identified as a “qualified person” in connection with the following documents, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Form 40-F”) of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) to which this consent relates: (A) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016, (B) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2016, (C) the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on a Feasibility Study of the Prestea Underground Gold Project in Ghana" effective date November 3, 2015 and filed on January 22, 2016, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from such documents in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-211926, 333-175542, 333-169047, 333-118958, 333-105821 and 333-105820), as amended, and Registration Statement No. 333-196906 on Form F-10, as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.











/s/ Jane Joughin


Jane Joughin





March 30, 2017
§ 308.153 Procedures where notice of disapproval issues pursuant to § 303.103(c) of this chapter. ( a ) The Notice of Disapproval shall be served upon the insured state nonmember bank and the candidate for director or senior executive officer. The Notice of Disapproval shall: ( 1 ) Summarize or cite the relevant considerations specified in § 308.152;
( 2 ) Inform the individual and the bank that a request for review of the disapproval may be filed within fifteen days of receipt of the Notice of Disapproval; and
( 3 ) Specify that additional information, if any, must be contained in the request for review.
( b ) The request for review must be filed at the appropriate regional office.
( c ) The request for review must be in writing and should: ( 1 ) Specify the reasons why the FDIC should reconsider its disapproval; and
( 2 ) Set forth relevant, substantive and material documents, if any, that for good cause were not previously set forth in the notice required to be filed pursuant to section 32 of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1831i).
[56 FR 37975, Aug. 9, 1991, as amended at 64 FR 62101, Nov. 16, 1999]