alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATE OF PERSON PERFORMING
FUNCTIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I, Jeffrey S. Yager, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Yager/Kuester
Public Fund Limited; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-1415(e) and 15d-1415(e)) for the registrant and we have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, is made known to us, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date:      November 12, 2004/s/ Jeffrey S. YagerJeffrey S. Yager, Manager of YFP, LLC, General PartnerDRY Limited Partnership, General Partner
H. R. 3538

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 South

Chicago Avenue in Saint Anne, Illinois, as the ‘‘Marine Capt. Ryan Beaupre

Saint Anne Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

201 South Chicago Avenue in Saint Anne, Illinois, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Marine Capt. Ryan Beaupre Saint Anne

Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Marine

Capt. Ryan Beaupre Saint Anne Post Office’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Your Glucose Meter

Glucose meters test and record how 

much sugar (called glucose) is in your 

blood. They help you track your blood 

sugar level at different times during the 

day and night.

Meters can help you know how well your 

diabetes medicines are working. They can 

also help you learn how the food you eat 

and your physical activity can change your 

blood sugar level.

Most meters come with three parts:

•	

•	

•	

Lancet - A needle that is used to get 

a drop of blood from your finger or 

another part of your body.

Test Strip - The strip where you put 

the blood you are testing.

Control Solutions - Liquid used 

to make sure your meter is working 

properly.

Meters come in different sizes. Meters 

also come with different features. Some 

meters let you track and print out your 

test results. Others have audio and larger 

screens to help people who have problems 

seeing. The meter you choose should fit 

your lifestyle and your needs.

2014

Get other resources for women with diabetes: 

www.fda.gov/womensdiabetes
To learn more:

www.fda.gov/womensdiabetes

Take Time To Care about Diabetes 2014

7 Helpful Tips for Testing Your Blood Sugar

1. Read the directions for the meter 

2. Wash your hands before you check 

your blood sugar. Food or juice on 

your fingers may affect your blood 

sugar result.

3. Use the right test strip for your 

meter. The meter may give you the 

wrong results if you use the wrong 

test strip.

4. Write down your results and the 

date and time you tested. Do 

this even if your meter tracks your 

numbers. Take the results with you 

when you go to your doctor.

5. Clean your meter as directed. Glass 

cleaners, ammonia and other cleaning 

products may damage your meter.

6. Talk to your health care provider 

about how your medicines will 

affect your blood sugar. Your other 

medicines and dialysis solution may 

affect your blood sugar reading.

7. Take your meter with you when you 

go to your doctor. This way you can 

test your blood sugar in front of the 

doctor or nurse to make sure you are 

doing it the right way. Your health care 

provider may be able to print out your 

blood sugar results from your meter.
§ 1203.407 Duration of classification. ( a ) At the time of original classification, the original classification authority shall establish a specific date or event for declassification based on the duration of the national security sensitivity of the information. Upon reaching the date or event, the information shall be automatically declassified. Except for information that should clearly and demonstrably be expected to reveal the identity of a confidential human source or a human intelligence source or key design concepts of weapons of mass destruction, the date or event shall not exceed the timeframe established in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) If the original classification authority cannot determine an earlier specific date or event for declassification, information shall be marked for declassification 10 years from the date of the original decision, unless the original classification authority otherwise determines that the sensitivity of the information requires that it be marked for declassification for up to 25 years from the date of the original decision.
( c ) An original classification authority may extend the duration of classification up to 25 years from the date of origin of the document, change the level of classification, or reclassify specific information only when the standards and procedures for classifying information under this Order are followed.
( d ) No information may remain classified indefinitely. Information that is marked for an indefinite duration of classification under predecessor orders, for example, information marked as “Originating Agency's Determination Required,” or classified information that contains either incomplete or no declassification instructions, shall have appropriate declassification information applied in accordance with part 3 of this order.
[78 FR 5118, Jan. 24, 2013]
#### § 269b.110 Charges.

A charge that any bank or labor organization, or agents or representatives of a bank or labor organization, has engaged in or is engaging in any act prohibited under § 269.6 of the policy or has failed to take any action required by § 269.6 of the policy may be filed by any party in interest, or its representative, within 60 days after the alleged violations or within 60 days after the charging party has become or should have become aware of the alleged violation.
§ 121.353 Emergency equipment for operations over uninhabited terrain areas: Flag, supplemental, and certain domestic operations. Unless the airplane has the following equipment, no person may conduct a flag or supplemental operation or a domestic operation within the States of Alaska or Hawaii over an uninhabited area or any other area that (in its operations specifications) the Administrator specifies required equipment for search and rescue in case of an emergency: ( a ) Suitable pyrotechnic signaling devices.
( b ) An approved survival type emergency locator transmitter. Batteries used in this transmitter must be replaced (or recharged, if the battery is rechargeable) when the transmitter has been in use for more than 1 cumulative hour, or when 50 percent of their useful life (or for rechargeable batteries, 50 percent of their useful life of charge) has expired, as established by the transmitter manufacturer under its approval. The new expiration date for replacing (or recharging) the battery must be legibly marked on the outside of the transmitter. The battery useful life (or useful life of charge) requirements of this paragraph do not apply to batteries (such as water-activated batteries) that are essentially unaffected during probable storage intervals.
( c ) Enough survival kits, appropriately equipped for the route to be flown for the number of occupants of the airplane.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19205, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-79, 36 FR 18724, Sept. 21, 1971; Amdt. 121-106, 38 FR 22378 Aug. 20, 1973; Amdt. 121-158, 45 FR 38348, June 9, 1980; Amdt. 121-239, 59 FR 32057, June 21, 1994; Amdt. 121-251, 60 FR 65932, Dec. 20, 1995]
#### HUMPHREY *v.*THE STATE.

No. 9169.

September 13, 1932.

*R. H. Humphrey,*for plaintiff in error.

*Lawrence S. Gamp, attorney-general, W. G. Neville, solicitor-general,*and *T. R. Gress, assistant attorney-general,*contra.

Bell, J.

On May 5, 1932, Davis Humphrey was adjudged a lunatic by a commission appointed by the ordinary of Jenkins County. He was thereafter, during the May term, 1932, of the superior court of the same county, indicted for the offense of murder, the indictment alleging that the homicide was committed during the preceding April. When arraigned upon this indictment, the defendant filed a plea in bar, based upon the adjudication of the lunacy commission and his detention in custody thereunder. This plea was stricken for insufficiency, on motion of the solicitor-general. Whereupon the defendant sued out a bill of exceptions and brought the case to this court.

Under the constitution, the Supreme Court has jurisdiction of criminal cases only in the event of “conviction of a capital felony.” The defendant here has not been convicted or even tried for the offense charged in the indictment. If the case should be classed as a criminal case (but see *Wilburn*v. *State,*140 *Ga.*138, *78*S. E. 819), it is not a criminal ease of which the Supreme Court has jurisdiction, because the plaintiff in error has not been convicted of a capital *667felony. On tlie other hand, if the case as outlined above should be classed as a civil case, it still does not fall within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, because it does not belong to any class of civil cases jurisdiction of which' is vested by the constitution in this court. It follows that jurisdiction of this case is not in the Supreme Court, but is in the Court of Appeals. Park’s Code Supp. 1922, §§ 6502, 6506, Ga. L. 1916, p. 19, §§ 1, 2. The case is similar to one arising on a motion to change the venue after an indictment for a capital felony, where the motion was based on the act of 1911 (Park’s Penal Code (1914), § 964, Ga. L. 1911, p. 74). Since the adoption of the constitutional amendment of 1916 relating to the jurisdiction of these two courts, the jurisdiction of all venue cases of this class has been vested in the Court of Appeals, and not the Supreme Court, provided no constitutional question was raised in the lower court. *Scoggins*v. *State,*24 *Ga. App.*677 (2) (102 S. E. 39); *Ruffin*v. *State,*151 *Ga.*743, 745 (108 S. E. 29, 30); *Wilson*v. *State,*173 *Ga.*275 (160 S. E. 319). Such has been the practice since the adoption of the amendment referred to. *Butler*v. *State,*26 *Ga. App.*435 (106 S. E. 744); *Balkman*v. *State,*28 *Ga. App.*39 (109 S. E. 925); *Ruffin*v. *State,*28 *Ga. App.*40 (110 S. E. 311); *Wilson*v. *State,*28 *Ga. App.*574 (112 S. E. 295); *Coggeshall*v. *State,*33 *Ga. App.*613 (126 S. E. 568). We conclude that the case should be transferred to the Court of Appeals; and it is so ordered.

*Transferred to the Court of Appeals.*

*All the Justices concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24898]



[[Page 53219]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 11 a.m.-12 noon.

Place: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East-West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status: Closed to the Public.

Matter to be Considered: 

Compliance Weekly Report--Commission Briefing

    The staff will brief the Commission on various compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: October 9, 2009.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-24898 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
Exhibit 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report  dated  March 9, 2005  accompanying  the  consolidated
financial  statements  and  schedules  included in the Annual Report of Innodata
Isogen, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
We hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  of said  report in the
Registration  Statements of Innodata Isogen,  Inc. on Form S-8 (Registration No.
33-85530,  dated October 21, 1994,  Registration No.  333-3464,  dated April 18,
1996,  Registration No.  33-63085,  dated September 9, 1998 and Registration No.
333-82185, dated July 2, 1999, and Registration No. 333-118506, dated August 24,
2004)  and on Form  S-3  (Registration  No.  33-62012,  dated  April  11,  1996,
Registration  No.  333-91649,   dated  January  6,  2000  and  Registration  No.
333-51400, dated January 2, 2001).


Grant Thornton LLP
Edison, New Jersey
March 9, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3538 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3538

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 201 South Chicago Avenue in Saint Anne, Illinois, as the ``Marine 
              Capt. Ryan Beaupre Saint Anne Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 
South Chicago Avenue in Saint Anne, Illinois, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Marine Capt. Ryan Beaupre Saint Anne Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Marine Capt. Ryan Beaupre 
Saint Anne Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 9, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4490

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus DARYL F. LOCUST, a/k/a Derek Locust, a/k/a 8, a/k/a Daryl Frank Locusts, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:06-cr-00040-RBS)
Submitted: December 17, 2007 Decided: January 4, 2008
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James S. Ellenson, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Timothy R. Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Daryl F. Locust was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin, crack, and cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000); conspiracy to import heroin, 21 U.S.C. § 963 (2000); interstate travel in aid of racketeering, 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(3) (2000) (three counts); conspiracy to commit money laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) (2000); money laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(A)(i), (B)(i) (2000) (ten counts); distribution of sixty-two grams of cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C) (2000); using and carrying a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking activity, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2000) (two counts); and being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (2000). The district court sentenced Locust to two consecutive life terms plus twenty-five years. He noted a timely appeal. Locust challenges only the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, arguing that the witnesses who testified against him were not credible because they were all drug dealers and/or convicted felons. A defendant challenging the sufficiency of the evidence faces a heavy burden. United States v. Beidler, 110 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1997). A jury’s verdict must be upheld on appeal if there is substantial evidence in the record to support it. Glasser v. United States , 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). In determining whether the evidence in the record is substantial, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the government.- 3 - United States v. Burgos , 94 F.3d 849, 862 (4th Cir. 1996) (en banc). Here, the government presented overwhelming and uncontradicted evidence of Locust’s extensive drug dealing and money laundering activities. Locust’s sole challenge to the evidence is that the witnesses who testified against him were all drug dealers, drug users, and/or convicted felons. However, it is well settled that this court does not review witness credibility. United States v. Saunders , 886 F.2d 56, 60 (4th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, we affirm Locust’s conviction. We deny Locust’s motion to relieve his attorney and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 794.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 794.150, no qualified handicapped person shall, because the agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by handicapped persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the agency.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3621

To extend the grace period for personal watercraft use in Lake Roosevelt 

National Recreation Area. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2003

Mr. NETHERCUTT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To extend the grace period for personal watercraft use in 

Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERSONAL WATERCRAFT TIME EXTENSION. 

4 The grace period described in the final rule issued 

5 on March 21, 2000 (65 Fed. Reg. 15,077 (2000)), regard6 ing personal watercraft use within certain units of the Na7 tional Park System, is extended until December 31, 2004, 

8 for Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area.

Æ
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TITO LEDESMA ARANETA; et al.,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-70124

Agency Nos. A072-544-549

 A072-544-550

 A072-544-652

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 15, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Tito Ledesma Araneta and his family, natives and citizens of the Philippines,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing

their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their application for

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

FILED

MAY 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-70124

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo legal determinations and for

substantial evidence factual findings. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056

(9th Cir. 2009). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because

petitioners did not establish that the three incidents of harm they experienced

constituted torture, see Gui v. INS, 280 F.3d 1217, 1230 (9th Cir. 2002)

(harassment, interrogation, threats, and two hit-and-run incidents did not amount to

torture), and they did not establish that it is more likely than not they would be

tortured at the instigation of or with the acquiescence of the Philippine

government, see Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 2008). We

reject petitioners’ contention that the BIA did not consider evidence of country

conditions as they have not overcome the presumption that the BIA considered this

evidence. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 603 (9th Cir. 2006). 

Accordingly, petitioners’ CAT claim fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.