alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 380.22 Administrative expenses of the receiver. ( a ) The term “administrative expenses of the receiver” includes those actual and necessary pre- and post-failure costs and expenses incurred by the Corporation in connection with its role as receiver in liquidating the covered financial company; together with any obligations that the receiver for the covered financial company determines to be necessary and appropriate to facilitate the smooth and orderly liquidation of the covered financial company. Administrative expenses of the Corporation as receiver for a covered financial company include: ( 1 ) Contractual rent pursuant to an existing lease or rental agreement accruing from the date of the appointment of the Corporation as receiver until the later of ( i ) The date a notice of the dissaffirmance or repudiation of such lease or rental agreement is mailed, or
( ii ) The date such disaffirmance or repudiation becomes effective; provided that the lesser of such lease is not in default or breach of the terms of the lease.
( 2 ) Amounts owed pursuant to the terms of a contract for services performed and accepted by the receiver after the date of appointment of the receiver up to the date the receiver repudiates, terminates, cancels or otherwise discontinues such contract or notifies the counterparty that it no longer accepts performance of such services;
( 3 ) Amounts owed under the terms of a contract or agreement executed in writing and entered into by the Corporation as receiver for the covered financial company after the date of appointment, or any contract or agreement entered into by the covered financial company before the date of appointment of the receiver that has been expressly approved in writing by the receiver after the date of appointment; and
( 4 ) Expenses of the Inspector General of the Corporation incurred in carrying out its responsibilities under 12 U.S.C. 5391(d).
( b ) Obligations to repay any extension of credit obtained by the Corporation as receiver through enforcement of any contract to extend credit to the covered financial company that was in existence prior to appointment of the receiver pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 5390(c)(13)(D) shall be treated as administrative expenses of the receiver. Other unsecured credit extended to the receivership shall be treated as administrative expenses except with respect to debt incurred by, or credit obtained by, the Corporation as receiver for a covered financial company as described in § 380.21(a)(1).
EXHIBIT 28.1
                                             ------------
                        ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE
                             UCFC LOAN TRUST 1997D
                         


      In accordance with Section 9.16 of that certain Pooling and
Servicing Agreement relating to UCFC Loan Trust 1997D dated as of 
December 1, 1997 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), by and 
among UCFC Acceptance Corporation, as depositor, United Companies 
Lending Corporation, as servicer (the "Servicer"), and Bankers Trust
Company of California, N.A., as trustee, the undersigned officer 
of the Servicer does hereby certify as follows: (i) a review of the
activities of the Servicer during 1997 and of performance under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under the undersigned
officer's supervision; and (ii) to the best of such undersigned officer's
knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for 1997.

     EXECUTED this 26th day of March, 1998.


                         /s/ C. GERON HARGON
                         -------------------------------------
                         C. Geron Hargon
                         President
                         United Companies Lending Corporation

                                    PAGE 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Restated Financial Data Schedule is filed to show changes resulting from
adoption of FAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share".
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,890
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                       281
<INVENTORY>                                     42,886
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,449
<PP&E>                                          63,022
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          112,524
<BONDS>                                         30,831
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         80
<COMMON>                                         3,772
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   220,656
<SALES>                                        183,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,249
<CGS>                                          127,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,679
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,766
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,913
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,850
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
#### DARLING *v.*GILL.

Bill of exceptions — quorum of the court — judicial acts — attorney in fact.

A bill of exceptions must be sealed by a majority of the court.

The sealing a bill of exceptions is a judicial act, and no judicial act can be performed by an agent or attorney in fact.

Error, to the Court of Common Pleas.

By the Court.

The bill of exceptions, which is the foundation of the error complained of in this case, is signed and sealed by the president judge and one associate judge only, which is less than a quorum of the court. It is true there is another signature; but it purports to be by the president judge, as *attorney in fact*for one of the associate judges. The signing a bill of exceptions is so far a judicial act, that it cannot be performed by *attorney.*A judge must act in his own proper person; he cannot act by deputy or attorney. We can take no judicial notice of this bill of exceptions.

The writ of error is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000796529
<NAME> FDS FOR HANOVER LEASE INCOME LTD. PARTNERSHIP 6/30/97
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          26,872
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,335
<PP&E>                                       5,032,434
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,032,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          153,475
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       25,570,053
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (25,678,193)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,335
<SALES>                                         47,499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               203,112
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                81,147
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                119,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            119,590
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   119,590
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 711.8 Enforcement.

Except as provided in this section, NCUA administers and enforces the Interlocks Act with respect to federally insured credit unions, and may refer any case of a prohibited interlocking relationship involving these entities to the Attorney General of the United States to enforce compliance with the Interlocks Act and this part.
#### SPITLER v. OHIO.

Error — final judgment — quashing the writ.

A writ of error only lies to a final judgment; and if it appear by the record produced that the court below have not yetgiven final judgment, the writ will be quashed.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas.

*Starkweather,*for the state,

moved to quash the writ of error, because no *final*judgment was rendered in the court below.

Bt the Court.

It appears by the record, that a verdict of guilty was found by the jury, and a motion in arrest of judgment, which was overruled, but no final sentence was passed upon the prisoner. The writ must be quashed.
#### § 107.100 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes the eligibility and operating requirements for civil small unmanned aircraft to operate over human beings or over moving vehicles in the United States, in addition to those operations permitted by § 107.39(a) and (b).
Red Ribbon Streams

Blue Ribbon Streams

within the

Billings Field Office

Planning Area

Map 26

Montana

 Wyoming

MUSSELSHELL

WHEATLAND GOLDEN

 VALLEY 

YELLOWSTONE

SWEET GRASS

STILLWATER

BIG HORN 

CARBON 

Legend

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

RedStreams

BlueStreams

Counties

Rivers

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü Wyoming

Map scale 1:900,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

0 45 90 180 270 360 450

Miles

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0264 Directorate Identifier: 2009NM244AD

A300 - 28 - 6064, R02 --- 3/10/08

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 334

For the relief of Nancy B. Wilson. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2003

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Nancy B. Wilson.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO WIDOW’S INSURANCE BENE4 FITS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of determining the 

6 eligibility of Nancy B. Wilson, the wife of Alphonse M. 

7 Wilson (social security number 271–18–9548), to widow’s 

8 insurance benefits under section 202(e) of the Social Secu9 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 402(e)), Nancy B. Wilson shall be 

10 deemed to have been married to Alphonse M. Wilson for 

11 a period of not less than 9 months immediately prior to 

12 the day on which Alphonse M. Wilson died. 
2

•HR 334 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) takes effect 

2 on March 21, 1991. 

3 (c) PAYMENT.—Any benefits to which Nancy B. Wil4 son is entitled for the period prior to the date of the enact5 ment of this Act shall be paid to her in a lump sum.

Æ
#### State of Indiana *v.*Paris.

[No. 22,270.

Filed May 28, 1913.]

From Floyd Circuit Court; *Harry C. Montgomery,*Special Judge.

Prosecution by the State of Indiana against John M. Paris. From a judgment quashing the indictment, this appeal is prosecuted.

*Reversed.*

*Thomas M. Honan,*Attorney-General, *Thomas H. Branaman, Edwin Corr*and *James W. McCullough,*for the State.

*Stotsenberg*& *Weathers*and *Charles D. Kelso,*for appellee.

Erwin, J.

The State of Indiana prosecutes the appellee in the above numbered cause from the Floyd Circuit Court. From a judgment quashing the indictment in said cause the State appeals to this court.

The question involved is the same as is presented in the case of *State*v. *Sittason*(1913), *ante*573, 101 N. E. 1010, and on the authority of that case the judgment is hereby reversed with order to the court below to overrule the motion to quash the indictment.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  Yager/Kuester Public Fund Limited Partnership

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Yager/Kuester Public
Fund Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") certify that the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal period ending September 30, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information obtained in that Form
10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Date       11/14/05                      By:           /s/ Jeffrey S. Yager
     --------------------------------       -------------------------------
                                                           Jeffrey S. Yager




Date       11/14/05                      By:             /s/ Thomas K. Emery
     --------------------------------       --------------------------------
                                                             Thomas K. Emery
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Report) of
Premier Exhibitions, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended August 31, 2008, Arnie Geller, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, and Harold Ingalls, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each certifies, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated: October 9, 2008 |  | /s/ Arnie Geller                               
|                       |  | Arnie Geller                                   
|                       |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|                       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                  
|                       | 
|Dated: October 9, 2008 |  | /s/ Harold W. Ingalls                          
|                       |  | Harold W. Ingalls                              
|                       |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     
|                       |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 263.98 Effect of suspension, debarment or censure. ( a ) *Debarment.* If the final order against the respondent is for debarment, the individual will not thereafter be permitted to practice before the Board unless otherwise permitted to do so by the Board pursuant to § 263.99 of this subpart.
( b ) *Suspension.* If the final order against the respondent is for suspension, the individual will not thereafter be permitted to practice before the Board during the period of suspension.
( c ) *Censure.* If the final order against the respondent is for censure, the individual may be permitted to practice before the Board, but such individual's future representations may be subject to conditions designed to promote high standards of conduct. If a written letter of censure is issued, a copy will be maintained in the Board's files.
( d ) *Notice of debarment or suspension.* Upon the issuance of a final order for suspension or debarment, the Board shall give notice of the order to appropriate officers and employees of the Board, to interested departments and agencies of the Federal Government, and to the appropriate authorities of the State in which any debarred or suspended individual is or was licensed to practice.
#### HENRY MORRIS v. NANCY ANN MORRIS.

Divorce — fraud—pregnancy—quakeress.

t is a fraud for a pregnant woman to represent herself virtuous to induce a marriage, and take means to prevent a discovery of her situation, for which a divorce may be decreed.

Divorce. Cause fraud in the defendant in imposing herself on the plaintiff, as a virtuous woman, when she was pregnant with child.

It appeared in evidence, that the complainant was an honest simple fellow of about twenty-eight years old, but little used to female society. He first saw the defendant who is a quaker, and thirty-five years old, in Indiana, the 4th of July, 1833. She pleased him much', so that he became instantly attached to her, and continued his unremitted attentions with her approbation, till they were married the 17th of October following. On the 10th of November, she was delivered of a full grown child, four months after their first interview, and twenty-three days after the marriage. The marriage took place in the dusk of the evening without lights, with only a quaker lady, sister of the defendant, a clergyman, and a male friend of the complainant present, and under circumstances as to the position and movement of the bride, with an arrangement of the full quaker dress of the ladies, which excited the suspicion of the clergyman. The husband and wife lived together without his suspicions being awakened, until the wife was taken in labor pains, and presented her wondering spouse a full grown child before the expiration of the honeymoon. After which they separated. The reputation of both parties stood fair in the neighborhood.

*Divorce*decreed. The child given to the mother.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3504 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3504

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
 redesignate the American Indian Education Foundation as the National 
           Fund for Excellence in American Indian Education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN EDUCATION FOUNDATION.

    (a) Redesignation.--Section 501(a) of title V of the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 458bbb(a)), as 
added by Public Law 106-568, is amended by striking ``the American 
Indian Education Foundation'' and inserting ``a foundation to be known 
as the `National Fund for Excellence in American Indian Education' 
(hereinafter referred to as the `Foundation')''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Title V of the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 458bbb), as added 
by Public Law 106-568, is amended--
            (1) in the heading to read as follows:

``TITLE V--NATIONAL FUND FOR EXCELLENCE IN AMERICAN INDIAN EDUCATION'';

        and
            (2) in the heading of section 501 to read as follows:

``SEC. 501. NATIONAL FUND FOR EXCELLENCE IN AMERICAN INDIAN 
              EDUCATION.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 14, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3504

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
 redesignate the American Indian Education Foundation as the National 
           Fund for Excellence in American Indian Education.
```
§ 111.40 Record retention. ( a ) The Administrator will maintain a pilot's records in the PRD for the life of the pilot. Any person requesting removal of the records pertaining to an individual pilot must notify the FAA of the pilot's death in a form and manner acceptable to the Administrator.
( b ) The notification must include the following: ( 1 ) The full name of the pilot as it appears on his or her pilot certificate;
( 2 ) The pilot's FAA-issued certificate number; and
( 3 ) A certified copy of the individual's certificate of death.
TS- AMID30

Attachment # 9

Pt. 2, Sec. B

Additional Information on the Absence of Tank Truck Cleaning Opera tions
#### § 105.5 General.

No person may conduct a parachute operation, and no pilot in command of an aircraft may allow a parachute operation to be conducted from an aircraft, if that operation creates a hazard to air traffic or to persons or property on the surface.