alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3395

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the definition of 

contribution in aid of construction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2003

Mr. HERGER (for himself and Mr. MATSUI) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

the definition of contribution in aid of construction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lower Regulatory Bur5 den for Homeowners Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF CONTRIBUTION IN AID OF CON7 STRUCTION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

9 118(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 

10 to definitions) is amended to read as follows: 
2

•HR 3395 IH 

1 ‘‘(A) CONTRIBUTION IN AID OF CONSTRUC2 TION.—The term ‘contribution in aid of con3 struction’ shall be defined by regulations pre4 scribed by the Secretary, except that such 

5 term—

6 ‘‘(i) shall include amounts paid as 

7 customer connection fees (including 

8 amounts paid to connect the customer’s 

9 water service line or sewer lateral line to 

10 the utility’s distribution or collection sys11 tem or extend a main water or sewer line 

12 to provide service to a customer), and 

13 ‘‘(ii) shall not include amounts paid as 

14 service charges for starting or stopping 

15 services.’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 subsection (a) shall apply to amounts received after the 

18 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 793.10 Limitation on National Credit Union Administration's authority. ( a ) An award, compromise or settlement of a claim hereunder in excess of $25,000 shall be effected only with the prior written approval of the Attorney General or his designee. For purposes of this paragraph, a principal claim and any derivative or subrogated claim shall be treated as a single claim.
( b ) An administrative claim may be adjusted, determined, compromised or settled hereunder only after consultation with the Department of Justice when, in the opinion of the National Credit Union Administration: ( 1 ) A new precedent or a new point of law is involved; or
( 2 ) A question of policy is or may be involved; or
( 3 ) The United States is or may be entitled to indemnity or contribution from a third party and the National Credit Union Administration is unable to adjust the third party claim; or
( 4 ) The compromise of a particular claim, as a practical matter, will or may control the disposition of a related claim in which the amount to be paid may exceed $25,000.
( c ) An administrative claim may be adjusted, determined, compromised or settled only after consultation with the Department of Justice when it is learned that the United States or any employee, agent or cost-plus contractor of the United States is involved in litigation based on a claim arising out of the same incident or transaction.
§ 117.7 Fatigue risk management system. ( a ) No certificate holder may exceed any provision of this part unless approved by the FAA under a Fatigue Risk Management System that provides at least an equivalent level of safety against fatigue-related accidents or incidents as the other provisions of this part.
( b ) The Fatigue Risk Management System must include: ( 1 ) A fatigue risk management policy.
( 2 ) An education and awareness training program.
( 3 ) A fatigue reporting system.
( 4 ) A system for monitoring flightcrew fatigue.
( 5 ) An incident reporting process.
( 6 ) A performance evaluation.
4 

EXHIBIT A 

PARTY APPEARANCE COVER SHEET

Name of Party U.S. Bank National Association as PREPA Bond 

Trustee 

Attorney 1 Appearance Method Via Zoom 

Name Clark Whitmore 

Law Firm Maslon LLP 

Email Clark.Whitmore@maslon.com 

Phone Number 612-672-8200 

Docket Entry No. of 

Notice of Appearance 

ECF No. 68 – Case 17-BK-4780 

Zoom Screen Name U.S. Bank as PREPA Bond Trustee / Whitmore, 

Clark / Maslon LLP 

Attorney 2 Appearance Method Via Zoom 

Name Michael McCarthy 

Law Firm Maslon LLP 

Email Mike.McCarthy@maslon.com 

Phone Number 612-672-8200 

Docket Entry No. of 

Notice of Appearance 

ECF No. 3044 – Case 17-BK-4780 

Zoom Screen Name U.S. Bank as PREPA Bond Trustee / McCarthy, 

Michael / Maslon LLP 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24139-1 Filed:05/04/23 Entered:05/04/23 16:15:32 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 1
Uriah Shockley

d.b.a, Rockwall Home Inspections

101 Oakridge Drive

Rockwall, Texas 75032

www.rockwallhomeinspections.com

(972) 772-6050

 

U.S. Department of Transportation September 8, 2015

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Ave S W

Washington, D. C. 20591

Attention: 

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Dear Ms. Newton

Additional Comments For Section 333 exemption and COA Request

The petitioner is a 3rd party inspector for both, Collin County and Rockwall County, two rapidly 

expanding areas in North Texas, with massive amounts of new infrastructures being installed to keep up 

with a rapidly growing population and rapidly growing planned communities.

Research studies show that the use of drones can help expedite construction sites by allowing; 

communities planners, engineers, surveyors, and developers; rapid access to detailed data so they can 

coordinate together to work smarter, faster and safer. The less time it takes to install roads and 

infrastructures the less time drivers and the general public is exposed to construction site hazards. Also, 

faster construction can save communities money.

As a third party inspector for Collin County and a phase/draw inspector for a National fund control 

company that inspects installation of infrastructures and planned communities in Anna, TX (Collin 

County) , the petitioner is extremely knowledgeable in the construction of planned communities and 

infrastructures (above and below ground) and would like to offer the use of a drone to communities so 

they can build faster, safer and more efficiently while saving tax dollars.

Also as a 3rd party inspector for Rockwall County, the inspector performed three (3) flood damaged 

property inspections for the, City of Rockwall, this past spring and is experienced working with City 

Managers, Senior Building Inspectors and Fire Chief. Again, the petitioner would like to make the use of 

aerial photography with a small Micro drone (Phantom Vision 2) available for city planners, rescue 

workers, inspectors, surveyors and engineers for new construction, planning for disaster, and disaster 

recovery.

Attached, is my recently renewed, Professional Inspector License, issued by the, Texas Real Estate 

Commission (valid thru 07/31/2017).

Best Regards

Uriah Shockley

101 Oakridge drive

Rockwall, TX 75032
§ 608.820 Applicability. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart shall apply to the collection of debts by administrative [or salary] offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716, 5 U.S.C. 5514, or other statutory or common law.
( b ) Offset shall not be used to collect a debt more than 10 years after the Government's right to collect the debt first accrued, unless facts material to the Government's right to collect the debt were not known and could not reasonably have been known by the official or officials of the Government who were charged with the responsibility of discovering and collecting such debt.
( c ) Offset shall not be used with respect to: ( 1 ) Debts owed by other agencies of the United States or by any State or local government;
( 2 ) Debts arising under or payments made under the Social Security Act, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or tariff laws of the United States; or
( 3 ) Any case in which collection by offset of the type of debt involved is explicitly provided for or prohibited by another statute.
( d ) Unless otherwise provided by contract or law, debts or payments which are not subject to offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716 or 5 U.S.C. 5514 may be collected by offset if such collection is authorized under common law or other applicable statutory authority.
§ 611.1000 General authority. ( a ) An amendment to a Farm Credit bank charter may relate to any provision that is properly the subject of a charter, including, but not limited to, the name of the bank, the location of its offices, or the territory served.
( b ) The FCA may make changes in the charter of a Farm Credit bank as may be requested by that bank and approved by the FCA pursuant to § 611.1010 of this part.
( c ) The FCA may, on its own initiative, make changes in the charter of a Farm Credit bank, and any chartered service corporation thereof, where the FCA determines that the change is necessary to accomplish the purposes of the Act.
[80 FR 51116, Aug. 24, 2015]
§ 796.2 Who is considered a senior examiner of the NCUA? For purposes of this part, an NCUA employee is considered to be the “senior examiner” for a federally insured credit union if the employee— ( a ) Has been authorized by NCUA to conduct examinations or inspections of federally insured credit unions on behalf of NCUA;
( b ) Has continuing, broad, and lead responsibility for examining or inspecting that federally insured credit union;
( c ) Routinely interacts with officers or employees of that federally insured credit union; and
( d ) Devotes a substantial portion of his or her time to supervising or examining that federally insured credit union.
# L_2013190EN.01009101.xml

| 11.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 190/91 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY DECISION No 438/12/COL of 28 November 2012 amending for the eighty-sixth time the procedural and substantive rules in the field of state aid
THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY, HAVING REGARD to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, ( 1 ) in particular to Articles 61 to 63 and Protocol 26 thereof,
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice, ( 2 ) in particular its Articles 5(2)(b) and 24,
Whereas: The Chapter in the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s State Aid Guidelines on state aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty ( 3 ) is due to expire on 30 November 2012, ( 4 )
That Chapter corresponds to the Community Guidelines on State aid for Rescuing and Restructuring Firms in Difficulty, ( 5 ) which expired on 9 October 2012, ( 6 )
On 28 September 2012 the European Commission adopted a Communication concerning the Prolongation of the application of the Community Guidelines on State Aid for Rescuing and Restructuring Firms in Difficulty of 1 October 2004, until they are replaced by new rules. ( 7 )
The current Chapter on state aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty which will expire on 30 November 2012 must therefore be prolonged in order to ensure the uniform application of state aid rules throughout the European Economic Area,
The European Commission and the EFTA States have been consulted,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1 The validity of the Chapter in the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s State Aid Guidelines on state aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty is prolonged until it is replaced by new rules.
Article 2 Only the English version is authentic.
Done at Brussels, 28 November 2012. For the EFTA Surveillance Authority Oda Helen SLETNES President Sverrir Haukur GUNNLAUGSSON College Member
( 1 )  The “EEA Agreement”. ( 2 )  The “Surveillance and Court Agreement”. ( 3 )  
OJ L 97, 15.4.2005, p. 41, EEA Supplement No 18, 15.4.2005, p. 1. ( 4 )  See paragraph 90, as extended by EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No. 433/09/COL of 30.10.2009 amending for the seventy-third time the procedural and substantive rules in the field of state aid. OJ L 48, 25.2.2010, p. 27, EEA Supplement No. 9, 25.2.2010, p. 12 ( 5 )  
OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p. 2-17. ( 6 )  See paragraph 102, as extended by European Commission Communication concerning the prolongation of the Community Guidelines on State aid for Rescuing and Restructuring Firms in Difficulty, OJ C 156, 9.7.2009, p. 3. ( 7 )  
OJ C 296, 2.10.2012, p. 3.

---
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ralph C. Guild, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    RALPH C.
GUILDRalph C. Guild Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer


Date: May 13, 2003



---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William J. McEntee, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    WILLIAM J. MCENTEE,
JR.William J. McEntee, Jr. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer


Date: May 13, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Center for Substance Abuse Prevention; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) National 
Advisory Council in May 2000.
    The meeting will be open and will include a presentations of CSAP's 
Director's Report, updates on CSAP's programs and budget, discussions 
of administrative matters and announcements. Public comments are 
welcome during the open session. Please communicate with the individual 
listed as contact below for guidance. If anyone needs special 
accommodations for persons with disabilities please notify the contact 
listed below.
    A summary of this meeting and roster of committee members may be 
obtained from Yuth Nimit, Executive Secretary, Rockwall II building, 
Suite 901, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone: 
(301) 443-8455.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the person 
whose name and telephone number is listed above.

    Committee Name: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, National 
Advisory Council.
    Meeting Date: May 12, 2000.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Pooks Hill Hotel, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20814.
    Contact: Yuth Nimit, 5515 Security Lane, Rockwall II Building, 
Suite 901, Rockville, Maryland 20852, Telephone: (301) 443-8455 and 
fax: (301) 443-6394.

    Dated: April 18, 2000.
Toian Vaughn,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-10362 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-M
Exhibit 23.0






      Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants



The Stockholders and the
 Board of Directors
 Haven Bancorp, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement Nos. 333-79740, No. 333-85056, 333-07083, and No. 333-
20823 on Forms S-8 and the Registration Statement Nos. 333-31129
and 333-76191 on Forms S-3 of Haven Bancorp, Inc. of our report
dated January 27, 2000, relating to the consolidated statements of
financial condition of Haven Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 1999
and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which
report is incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1999 Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Haven Bancorp, Inc.


KPMG LLP

Melville, New York
March 30, 2000
## NO. 12-08-00055-CR IN THE COUR T OF APP EALS TWELFTH COURT OF APP EALS D ISTR ICT

TYLER, TEXA S
DUSTIN RAY BIS HOP, § APPEAL F ROM THE 124TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRI CT COURT OF TH E ST ATEOFTEX

AS, APP ELL EE § GREG G COU NT Y, TEX

AS MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION PER CU RIAM Appellant has f

iled a motion to dismiss this appeal. T he motion is signed by Appellant and his counsel. No dec ision having been delivere d by this court, the motion is grante d, and the appeal is dismi ssed in acc ordanc e with Texa s Rule of AppellateProcedure 42.2. Opinion delivere d July 9, 2008. P an el consi s t ed of

W ort hen, C. J. , G r i

f f i t h, J. , and H oyl e, J.

(DO N OT PUBLISH)
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 36

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that remarriage of the 

surviving spouse of a deceased veteran after age 55 shall not result 

in termination of dependency and indemnity compensation otherwise payable to that surviving spouse. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, and Mr. EVANS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that 

remarriage of the surviving spouse of a deceased veteran 

after age 55 shall not result in termination of dependency and indemnity compensation otherwise payable to 

that surviving spouse.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RETENTION OF DEPENDENCY AND INDEMNITY 

4 COMPENSATION FOR SURVIVING SPOUSES 

5 REMARRYING AFTER AGE 55. 

6 (a) EXCEPTION TO TERMINATION OF BENEFITS

7 UPON REMARRIAGE.—Section 103(d)(2)(B) of title 38, 
2

•HR 36 IH 

1 United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘1311 or’’ 

2 after ‘‘under section’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall take effect on—

5 (1) the first day of the first month that begins 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act; or 

7 (2) the first day of the fiscal year that begins 

8 in the calendar year in which this Act is enacted, if 

9 later than the date specified in paragraph (1). 

10 (c) RETROACTIVE BENEFITS PROHIBITED.—No ben11 efit may be paid to any person by reason of the amend12 ment made by subsection (a) for any period before the 

13 effective date specified in subsection (b).

Æ
§ 792.10 What will NCUA do with my request? ( a ) On receipt of any request, the Information Center assigns it to the appropriate processing schedule, pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section. The date of receipt for any request, including one that is addressed incorrectly or is forwarded to NCUA by another agency, is the earlier of the date the appropriate Information Center actually receives the request or 10 working days after either of NCUA's Information Centers receives the request.
( b ) NCUA has a multi-track processing system. Requests for records that are readily identifiable by the Information Center and have already been cleared for public release may qualify for fast track processing. Requests that meet the requirements of § 792.18 will be processed on the expedited track. All other requests will be handled under normal processing procedures in the order they were received.
( c ) The Information Center will make the determination whether a request qualifies for fast track processing or expedited track processing. You may contact the Information Center to learn to which track your request has been assigned. If your request has not qualified for fast track processing, you will have an opportunity to limit the scope of material requested to qualify for fast track processing. Limitations of requests must be in writing. If your request for expedited processing is not granted, you will be advised of your right to appeal.
( d ) The Information Center will normally process requests in the order they are received in the separate processing tracks. However, in NCUA's discretion, a particular request may be processed out of turn.
( e ) Upon a determination by the appropriate Information Center to comply with your initial request for records, the records will be made promptly available to you. NCUA will also advise you of the right to seek assistance from the FOIA Public Liaison. If we notify you of a denial of your request, we will include the reason for the denial. NCUA will also advise you of the right to utilize dispute resolution services offered by the FOIA Public Liaison and the Office of Government Information Services.
( f ) The Information Center will search for records responsive to your request and will generally include all records in existence at the time the search begins. If we use a different search cut-off date, we will inform you of that date.
[63 FR 14338, Mar. 25, 1998, as amended at 68 FR 61737, Oct. 30, 2003; 73 FR 30478, May 28, 2008; 73 FR 56937, Oct. 1, 2008; 81 FR 93794, Dec. 22, 2016; 82 FR 29712, June 30, 2017]
#### COWDEN *v.*STARR.

Scire facias on a judgment of restitution — execution—profert—mandate for execution.

A scire facias to be restored money collected upon a judgment which is reversed, is process of execution, and issues from the court having by law execution of the judgment of restitution on error.

Such writ, by our practice, should aver that the judgment was remanded by the Supreme Court to the Court of Common Pleas for execution.

Profert of a *record*must be made in a scire facias; it is not sufficient to make profert of *the books*in *the clerk's office.*

Appeal from the Common Pleas. Scire facias, on a judgment of restitution, in the reversal of a former judgment to recover'back the money collected upon execution, on the judgment before its reversal. General demurrer to the sci. fa. which is joined.

*D. L.*Collier, for the demurrant,

made two points:

1. That the Common Pleas had no jurisdiction in this case, as the *record*is in this court.

2. The profert is bad, as showing ho record, it only averring that it appears, *by the books in the clerk's office. Arch.*Forms, 200; *Sil. Ent.*641-51; *Tidd'sP.*541; 2 *Saund. R.*101.

Tappan, contra,

cited *Hob.*4. The record remains in the Common Pleas, and the sci. fa. must issue from that court.

By the Court.

The sci. fa. does not show that the judgment of restitution was remanded by the Supreme Court to the Court of Common Pleas for execution; if it did, as the sci.fa. in this instance is used as process of execution, it would properly issue from the court having the execution of the judgment, conferred upon it by law.

A sci. fa. supposes the existence of a record, and profert must be made of a record. The profert here *of the books in the clerk's office,*may, or may not be of a record. The demurrer is well taken.

Leave was given to the plaintiff to amend, on paying costs.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-75811) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option Plan, Amended and Restated 1988 Stock Option Plan,
and Amended and Restated 1992 Stock Option Plan of Thomas Group, Inc. of our report dated February 18, 2002, except for Note 2 as to which the date is March 29, 2002, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Thomas Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

|                             |  | /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|---------------------------- |  | --------------------
|Dallas, Texas
April 15, 2002 |  |                     

---

QuickLinks