alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 7.1015 National bank and Federal savings association investments in small business investment companies. ( a ) *National banks.* A national bank may invest in a small business investment company (SBIC) or in any entity established solely to invest in SBICs, including purchasing the stock of a SBIC, subject to appropriate capital limitations (*see e.g.,* 15 U.S.C. 682(b)), and may receive the benefits of such stock ownership (*e.g.,* stock dividends). The receipt and retention of a dividend by a national bank from a SBIC in the form of stock of a corporate borrower of the SBIC is not a purchase of stock within the meaning of 12 U.S.C. 24(Seventh).
( b ) *Federal savings associations.* Federal savings associations may invest in a SBIC or in any entity established solely to invest in SBICs as provided in 12 CFR 160.30.
( c ) *Qualifying SBIC.* A national bank or Federal savings association may invest in a SBIC that is either: ( 1 ) Already organized and has obtained a license from the Small Business Administration; or
( 2 ) In the process of being organized.
( d ) *SBIC wind-down.* A national bank or Federal savings association may retain an interest in a SBIC that has voluntarily surrendered its license to operate as a SBIC in accordance with 13 CFR 107.1900 and does not make any new investments (other than investments in cash equivalents, which, for the purposes of this paragraph (d), means high quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity corresponds to the issuer's expected or potential need for funds and whose currency corresponds to the issuer's assets) after such voluntary surrender.
[85 FR 83728, Dec. 22, 2020]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3646 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3646

               For the relief of Adela and Darryl Bailor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2003

Ms. Carson of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Adela and Darryl Bailor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF CERTAIN LOSSES.

    (a) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, not later 
than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, out of 
funds not otherwise appropriated, to Adela and Darryl Bailor the amount 
determined by the Attorney General under section 2(b).
    (b) Settlement.--The payment of this sum shall be in full 
settlement of all claims of Adela and Darryl Bailor arising from an 
incident on May 9, 1991 that is the subject of Case No. 94-2660 in the 
United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit.
    (c) No Inference of Liability.--Nothing in this Act shall be 
construed as an inference of liability on the part of the United 
States.
    (d) Limitation.--No person shall have any claim on the amount 
described in this section, whether contractual, equitable or statutory, 
except for reasonable attorneys fees and expenses that do not exceed 
10% of the amount paid under subsection (a).

SEC. 2. AMOUNT.

    (a) Transmittal of Claims.--Not later than 6 months after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, Adela and Darryl Bailor, or their 
representative, shall transmit to the Attorney General all claims for 
compensation referred to in section 1.
    (b) Determination of the Attorney General.--Not later than 1 year 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, with appropriate 
consideration given to the claims transmitted under subsection (a), the 
Attorney General shall determine the amount that Adela and Darryl 
Bailor shall receive.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Peter J. Bradford, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (“Registrant”); 2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 3, 2005
/s/ PETER J. BRADFORDPeter J. Bradford
§ 119.37 Contents of an Air Carrier Certificate or Operating Certificate. The Air Carrier Certificate or Operating Certificate includes— ( a ) The certificate holder's name;
( b ) The location of the certificate holder's principal base of operations;
( c ) The certificate number;
( d ) The certificate's effective date; and
( e ) The name or the designator of the responsible Flight Standards office.
[Docket No. 28154, 60 FR 65913, Dec. 20, 1995, as amended by Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 119-19, 83 FR 9172, Mar. 5, 2018]
daoR ni

36 31

saB sniksoH

£¤

01 06

Curtis Road

78 

d

S

a

U

oR rednax

No

e

r

l

th

A

Fork Cro

Crooked Creek Road Heag

o

 Road

ked

Creek

S

k

o

e

ut

e

h Fo

Cr

rk

d C oke ro

17 Mile Special Recreation

Management Area

Alternative C

R26E

0 0.25 0.5 1

Miles

Map 96

T

3

N

Map scale 1:45,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

87

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Legend

17 Mile SRMA

US Highway 87

Roads

Streams

Bureau of Land Management

State Lands

Private

Public Lands Survey System

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings 

Field 

Office

Ü
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

RICARDO RAMIREZ, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 18-0059 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2008-155341-001

The Honorable Warren J. Granville, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

Ricardo Ramirez, Florence

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Kenton D. Jones, Judge Michael J. Brown, and Judge Jon 

W. Thompson delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 7-24-18
STATE v. RAMIREZ

Decision of the Court

2

P E R C U R I A M:

¶1 Petitioner Ricardo Ramirez seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is the petitioner’s first

successive petition. 

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this Court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 576-77, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s 

burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion in denying the 

petition. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not shown any abuse of discretion. 

¶4 Accordingly, we grant review and deny relief.
#### MITCHELL & CO. V. MAYFIELD WOOLEN MILLS COMPANY.

(Decided June 5, 1913.)

Appeal from Coosa Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. S. L. Brewer.

George A. Sorrell, for appellant. Tys'on, Wilson & Martin, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
#### TEAR *v.*MATHEWS.

Resulting trust — voluntary conveyance — -cloud upon title prevented as well as removed*

Where one buys land for another and with his money, and the deed by mistake is made the agent purchasing instead of his principal, the agent may afterwards convey to his principal without consideration, and though he be embarrassed at the time, the conveyance is good.

A levy upon a man’s real estate as the property of another, and the proceeding to sell at the sheriff’s sale, is calculated to embarrass and throw a cloud over the ..title, and will be enjoined in chancery.

In Chancery. The complainant alleges that he is the owner, and is in possession of a lot of land, which the defendant claims to belong to another person, and has levied upon the property of another, and is about to sell as such, which will embarrass his title. - He prays an injunction. The defendant admits the levy and the complainant’s possession, hut claims that the conveyance to the complainant is fraudulent.

/. *H.*Paine, for the complainant.

■ *P. Hitchcock*and *S.*Mathews, for the defendant.

*372Br the Court.

It appears that the purchase of this property, was made by William Tear, for *John, and paid for with John's*money, but because the deed was drawn by mistake to *William,*the purchaser, to avoid the trouble of drawing a new deed, accepted it, and William afterwards conveyed to John, without *pay.*William' being in debt, it is claimed the conveyance is fraudulent and void. The parties are ignorant foreigners. We see no evidence of fraud on the part of the complainant, or any thipg to warrant the defendant’s levy. The proceeding by the defendant is calculated to cloud and embarrass the title of the complainant, and may be restrained upon the authority of several decisions, as well as enjoined; 3 *O. R.*216; 5 O. *R.*267. We find the land the property of the complainant, and perpetually enjoin the defendant from proceeding against it upon his levy.
Aircraft

Inquiries

N-number

Serial Number

Name

Make / Model

Engine Reference

Dealer

Document Index

State and County

Territory and Country

Pending / Expired /

Canceled Registration

Reports

Recent Registration

N-number Availability

Request A Reserved

N-Number

Online

In Writing

Reserved NNumber Renewal

Online

Request for Aircraft

Records

Online

Help

Main Menu

Aircraft Registration

Aircraft Downloadable

Database

Definitions

N-Number Format

Registrations at Risk

Contact Aircraft

Registration

Name:

Sorted By:

FAA Home Licenses & Certificates Aircraft Certification Aircraft Registration Aircraft Inquiry Name Inquiry

FAA REGISTRY

Name Inquiry Results

DUE NORTH PRODUCTIONS

N-Number

Data Updated each Federal Working Day at Midnight

Showing 1 - 7 of 7 (Page 1 of 1)

N-Number Serial Number Manufacturer Name

Model

Name

Address

4060H 25-0459 MOONEY AIRCRAFT CORP. 

M20K

DUE NORTH PRODUCTIONS INC

450DN 0002B MARK SMITH 

450 FLAMEWHEEL

DUE NORTH PRODUCTIONS

451DN 6751A HORIZON HOBBY INC 

CHROMA CAMERA DRONE

DUE NORTH PRODUCTIONS

452DN 6101A DJI 

INSPIRE 1

DUE NORTH PRODUCTIONS

453DN 0006A MARK SMITH 

550 FLAMEWHEEL

DUE NORTH PRODUCTIONS

454DN 0900A MARK SMITH 

SPREADING WINGS 900

DUE NORTH PRODUCTIONS

556GC 0001A DJI 

FLAMEWHEEL F450

DUE NORTH PRODUCTIONS

Showing 1 - 7 of 7 (Page 1 of 1)

Data Updated each Federal Working Day at Midnight

» » » » »
```

[110th Congress Public Law 68]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ068.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 571]]

Public Law 110-68
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
408 West 6th Street in Chelsea, Oklahoma, as the ``Clem Rogers McSpadden 
     Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Aug. 9, 2007 -  [H.R. 2127]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CLEM ROGERS MCSPADDEN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 408 West 6th Street in Chelsea, Oklahoma, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Clem Rogers McSpadden Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Clem Rogers 
McSpadden Post Office Building''.

    Approved August 9, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2127:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            June 18, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
**Exhibit 5.2**

 

**Consent ofLandy Stinnet**

 

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Annual Report”) of QueenstakeResources Ltd. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission.

 

I hereby consent to the references to my nameunder the heading “Narrative Description of the Business — Principal OperatingProperty — Jerritt Canyon Mine — Mineral Reserve and Resource Estimates” in theCompany’s Annual Information Form and to all other references to my nameincluded or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report and in the Company’sRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-119779), whichincorporates by reference the Annual Report.

 

 

Very truly yours

 

 
| /s/ Landy Stinnet    |                              |   |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
| Name:                | Landy Stinnet                     |   |
| Title:               | Associate Mining Engineer,        |   |
|                 | SRK  Consulting (U.S.), Inc. |   |
|                 |                              |   |
|                 |                              |   |
| March 30,  2006 |                              |
|                      |                                   |        |  |

 

----
From: Mike Ahern

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: chromium_request.xlsx

Date: Friday, March 11, 2011 10:12:42 AM

Attachments: chromium_request.XLSX

chromium.ZIP

Hi Cindy,

Attached is a spreadsheet of the operating facilities that match the SCCs you provided. Also attached is a

facility profile for each of the facilities. In each profile, you should be able to identify many of the

parameters and control information you are interested in. In addition, you can use the ten-digit facility ID

to search for all permits issued to each facility by entering the facility ID into our public permits search

web page.

To access any/all permit documents that we have electronically that are associated with the facilities listed the

spreadsheet, simply go to http://extapex.epa.state.oh.us/epaxp/f?p=840:10 and enter the ten-digit facility ID

associated with the facility (first column of the spreadsheet).

The search results will pull up all permit records available in STARS2 (our internal permitting system). If we have

any electronic copy of permit terms in STARS2 that are associated with an issued final permit, there will be a link

on the far right column of the search results. Clicking on the link will provide access to a fully text searchable copy

of the permit terms. Please note that our electronic copies of permit terms date back to late 1998 for PTIs and back

to 1995 for Title V and State PTOs. Some documents represent only the portion of the issued permit that was

specific to the operations being permitted at the time (i.e., the general terms and conditions may not be present in

the PDF document, but the PDF document does represent the operation-specific requirements that were issued

final). This is the result of how the predecessor to STARS2 was structured and how data migrated from that old

system to the current system (and is exactly what a staff person sees when they access the electronic document

via STARS2). An original copy of the "whole" permit can be obtained by contacting the appropriate Ohio EPA

District office or local air agency (they can scan the hard copy and send it via email), or, as we indicate on the web

page that links to the search page, "Official hard copies of permits are available for accurate verification in the

Director's Journal."

Please feel free to contact me with any questions.

Sincerely,

Mike Ahern

Permit Issuance and Data Management Section

Division of Air Pollution Control

mike.ahern@epa.state.oh.us

614-644-3631

mwa

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Unless otherwise provided by law,

this communication and any response to it constitutes a public record.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
OF REXALL SUNDOWN AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                      81,942,305
<SECURITIES>                                24,826,323
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,373,073<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 38,623,335
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           177,705,609
<PP&E>                                      33,788,825<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             224,114,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,076,005
<BONDS>                                              0<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       672,600
<OTHER-SE>                                 190,916,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               224,114,170
<SALES>                                    263,369,670
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           263,369,670
<CGS>                                       98,764,920
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               98,764,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           114,317,979
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              95,226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             54,538,406
<INCOME-TAX>                                19,476,810
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         35,061,596
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                35,061,596
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Net of allowance.
<F2>Net of depreciation.
<F3>Includes Long-term obligations.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3506 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3506

  To amend the Federal Power Act to authorize a State to regulate the 
   sale at wholesale of electric energy generated, transmitted, and 
     distributed solely within that State, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2003

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Power Act to authorize a State to regulate the 
   sale at wholesale of electric energy generated, transmitted, and 
     distributed solely within that State, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATE REGULATION OF SALE AT WHOLESALE OF ELECTRIC ENERGY 
              GENERATED, TRANSMITTED, AND DISTRIBUTED INTRASTATE.

    Section 201 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 824) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h) State Regulation of Intrastate Sale of Electric Energy at 
Wholesale.--A State may regulate the sale of electric energy at 
wholesale, including fixing rates for such sale, if the electric energy 
is generated solely within that State for transmission and distribution 
solely within that State. The Commission shall not have jurisdiction to 
regulate such intrastate sale of electric energy at wholesale to the 
extent the State regulates such sale.''.
                                 <all>
```