alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L AW 

# O FFICE OF 

# J OHN 

# M IETUS
, LLC 6701 D EMOCRACY B OULEVARD , S UITE 300 B ETHESDA , MD 20817

- 7500

J OHN R. M IETUS , J R

. (202) 747

- 5212 (240) 396

- 5362 fax john@mietuslaw.com

November 22 , 2013

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL

Ms. Lauralyn Remo Air Carrier Fitness Division U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Orange Air, Inc., Docket s OST

- 2011

- 0073/0074

Dear Ms. Remo :
Orange Air respectfully requests that the Department again waive condition 9 of the certificate issued to it by Order 2011

- 11

- 31, condition 10 of the certificate issued by Order 2012

- 1

- 31 , and 14 C.F.R. 204.7 so as to extend, through February 28, 2014, the time within which Orange Air must commence actual flight operations in order to maintain its interstate and foreign c ertificate authority. Pursuant to a waiver granted by letter dated July 31, 2013
, t he se provisions currently require Orange Air to commence actual flight operations no later than November 31 , 201 3

. However, due to further circumstances beyond Orange Air’ s control, the Federal Aviation Administration and Orange Air will not be able to complete new entrant certification by that date.
The FAA and Orange Air are continuing to work to wards the airline’s certification. Since the last waiver was granted, Orange Air has been preparing for the Aircraft Conformity P rocess

-- unanticipated aircraft repairs were required

-- and otherwise working with the FAA on manual preparation and other tasks associated with certification. The Federal government budget cris is and shutdown, and now the upcoming holiday season, have made it difficult for the FAA and Orange Air to coordinate final c ertification tasks, some of which require National Field Office personnel . Based on its meeting with the FAA this week, Orange Air now expects aircraft conformity activities to begin December 9 , 2013 . If that holds true, the goal is to complete FAA certification during the third week of January, 2014. (Jeff Hipps and Charley Beers remain the local FAA project and frontline
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
            REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
                     ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      I, Eric Bello, Treasurer (principal financial officer) of Quipp, Inc., a
Florida corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:

      (1)   The Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
            September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
            1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                     *  *  *

ERIC BELLO
---------------------------------------
Eric Bello
Treasurer (principal financial officer)

Date: November 18, 2005

                                       19
§ 617.7100 Who must make and who is entitled to receive an effective interest rate disclosure? ( a ) A qualified lender must make the disclosures required by subparts B and C of this part to borrowers for all loans not subject to the Truth in Lending Act.
( b ) For a single loan involving more than one borrower, a qualified lender is required to provide only one set of disclosures to borrowers. All borrowers may designate, in writing, one person who will receive the effective interest rate disclosure. If the borrowers do not designate a particular recipient, the lender may provide the disclosure to at least one of the borrowers who is primarily liable for repayment of the loan.
§ 622.57 Waiver of hearing; consent. ( a ) *Waiver.* Failure to request a hearing pursuant to § 622.56 constitutes a waiver of the opportunity for a hearing and the notice of assessment issued pursuant to § 622.55 will constitute a final and unappealable order.
( b ) *Consent.* Any party afforded a hearing who does not appear at the hearing personally or by a duly authorized representative is deemed to have consented to the issuance of an assessment order.
[51 FR 21139, June 11, 1986, as amended at 70 FR 12585, Mar. 15, 2005]
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 21-60062 

Summary Calendar 

Marta Bonger Zrgua, 

Petitioner, 

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent. 

Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals 

BIA No. A206 639 442 

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges. 

Per Curiam:*

Marta Bonger Zrgua, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for 

review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her 

appeal from the denial of her application for asylum, withholding of removal, 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

January 4, 2022 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 21-60062 Document: 00516154087 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/04/2022
No. 21-60062 

2 

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) and her motion 

to remand. 

She contends that the BIA abused its discretion in denying her motion 

to remand because she received ineffective assistance of counsel when 

counsel failed to inform her of the need to provide corroborative evidence or 

explain why such evidence was important. Because she does not challenge 

the determination that she was not entitled to asylum, withholding of 

removal, or protection under the CAT based on her failure to provide 

reasonably available corroborative evidence, she has abandoned review of 

those claims. See Chambers v. Mukasey, 520 F.3d 445, 448 n.1 (5th Cir. 2008). 

We review the BIA’s denial of a request for a remand for an abuse of 

discretion. Milat v. Holder, 755 F.3d 354, 365 (5th Cir. 2014). 

To establish a claim of ineffective assistance, a petitioner must 

demonstrate substantial prejudice resulting from counsel’s deficient 

performance. Gutierrez-Morales v. Homan, 461 F.3d 605, 609 (5th Cir. 2006). 

Despite her assertions to the contrary, she is unable to demonstrate that her 

former attorney acted unreasonably because the attorney produced emails 

and other documents in which the attorney asked her to provide 

corroborating documents from her friends and family, and when she failed to 

do so, the attorney asked her to explain why the evidence was unavailable. 

Moreover, in her affidavit in support of the motion for a remand, Bonger 

Zrgua acknowledges that the attorney asked if she had documents from 

home, such as letters from family; asked about her communications with her 

father and siblings; and asked her why she did not have a letter from her 

father. Based upon the foregoing, she has failed to demonstrate that the BIA 

abused its discretion in concluding that she failed to demonstrate that her 

former attorney rendered ineffective assistance. 

Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED. 

Case: 21-60062 Document: 00516154087 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/04/2022
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Icagen, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Richard D. Katz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 9, 2011 |  | /s/ Richard D. Katz    
|                     |  | Richard D. Katz, M.D.  
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 01087

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 01087\01087_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

01087\01087_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 01087\01087_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01087\01087_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01087\01087_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01087\01087_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01087\01087_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

01087\Certification Statement Plant ID 01087.pdf Plant certification statement

x 01087\Supplemental Documents\01087_Part D 4.1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01087\Supplemental Documents\01087_Question A5-2 Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01087\Supplemental Documents\01087_Question A5-3 Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01087\Supplemental Documents\Part D.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
###### Editorial Note on Part 11

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

#### § 11.1 To what does this part apply?

This part applies to the issuance, amendment, and repeal of any regulation for which FAA (“we”) follows public rulemaking procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) (5 U.S.C. 553).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

# AGENCY:

Department of Transportation. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2000-4-20); Dockets OST-99-6173 and OST-00-6777. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Transportation is directing all interested persons to show cause why it should not issue orders (1) finding that Trans Borinquen Air, Inc., fails to meet the U.S. citizenship requirements of 49 U.S.C. 41102 and 40102(a)(15), and (2) denying it certificates to engage in interstate and foreign charter all-cargo transportation. 

# DATES:

Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than May 3, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

Objections and answers to objections should be filed in Dockets OST-99-6173 and OST-00-6777 and addressed to Department of Transportation Dockets (SVC-124, Room PL-401), Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590 and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Galvin Coimbre, Air Carrier Fitness                               ( print page 24251)                            Division (X-56, Room 6401), Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-5347.                     

Dated: April 19, 2000. 

Robert S. Goldner, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 00-10244 Filed 4-24-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-U
# T HOMPSON 

# & K NIGHT LLP

SCOTT P. STOLLEY ATTORNEYS AND COUNSE LORS AUSTIN DALLAS FORT WORTH HOUSTON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO



### ---------------------------------------------- - ALGIERS LONDON MÉ XICO CITY MONTERREY PARIS ONE ARTS PLAZA 1722 ROUTH STREET ● SUITE 1500 DALLAS, TEXAS 75201

- 2533 214.969.1700 FAX 214.969.1751

www.tklaw.com DIRECT DIAL: (214) 969

- 1678 EMAIL: Scott.Stolley@tklaw.com

Board Certified

– Civil Appellate Law Texas Board of Legal Specialization 

# April 14, 2015
Mrs. Lisa Matz, Clerk of the Court Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 600 Commerce Street Suite 200 Dallas, Texas 75202

Re: MRC Permian Company and Joe Foran v. Three Rivers Operating Company and Three Rivers Acquisition LLC Court of Appeals No. 05-14-00353-CV Trial Court Case No. DC-12-12637-A T&K File No. 519499.000002

Dear Mrs. Matz:

In response to your February 26, 2015 notice about the April 28, 2015 oral argument, this is to inform you that Craig Haynes will present argument on behalf of Appellees.

Sincerely,

/s/ Scott P. Stolley Scott P. Stolley SPS:clm

cc: Nina Cortell – via e -mail delivery Jeremy D. Kernodle – via e-mail delivery D. Patrick Long – via e-mail delivery William D. White – via e-mail delivery

519499 000002 14702015.1 ACCEPTED 05-14-00353-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS 4/14/2015 2:30:59 PM

LISA MATZ CLERK
[J-73-2022] 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: NOMINATION PAPER OF 

BRITTANY KOSIN FOR 

REPRESENTATIVE IN THE GENERAL 

ASSEMBLY FROM THE 178TH 

LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT 

OBJECTION OF: MARY RODERICK, JOHN 

COPPENS, AND ANDREW GANNON

APPEAL OF: BRITTANY KOSIN

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 92 MAP 2022

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court at No. 393 

MD 2022 dated August 23, 2022.

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: September 22, 2022

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2022, the Order of the Commonwealth 

Court is AFFIRMED. Opinion to follow.
§ 655.10 Reports of condition. ( a ) *General.* The Corporation must prepare and publish annual reports to its shareholders of its condition, including financial statements and related schedules, exhibits, and other documents that are part of the reports. The contents of each report must be equivalent in content to the annual report to shareholders required by the Securities Act unless we issue instructions otherwise.
( b ) *Signatures and certification.* Each report issued under this subpart must be signed. The Corporation must designate the representatives who will sign each report. The name and position title of each person signing the report must be printed beneath his or her signature. The signatories must certify the report by using the SEC rules on certifications for disclosures in annual reports to shareholders.
( c ) *Distribution.* The Corporation must distribute the signed annual report of condition to its shareholders within 120 days of its fiscal year-end. Within 5 days of signing, the Corporation must provide to us an electronic copy of every signed report that is distributed to its shareholders. If it is impossible to provide an electronic copy, a paper copy must be submitted within the required time frame and an electronic copy as soon as possible after that. ( 1 ) The Corporation must publish on its Web site a copy of each annual report to shareholders within 3 business days of filing the report with us. The report must remain on the Web site until the next report is posted. When the reports are the same as those filed with the SEC, electronic links to the SEC filings Web site may be used in satisfaction of this requirement.
( 2 ) Upon receiving a request for an annual report of condition from a stockholder, investor, or the public, the Corporation must promptly provide the requester the most recent annual report issued in compliance with this section.
[81 FR 49155, July 27, 2016, as amended at 86 FR 27798, May 24, 2021]
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.606 Contents of application. ( a ) A prevailing eligible party, as defined in §§ 747.602, 747.603, and 747.604, seeking an award under this section, must file an application for an award of fees and expenses with the Secretary of the NCUA Board. The application shall include the following information: ( 1 ) The identity of the applicant and the proceeding for which an award is sought;
( 2 ) A showing that the applicant has prevailed and an identification of the issues in the proceeding on which the applicant believes that the position of NCUA was not substantially justified;
( 3 ) A statement, with supporting documentation, that the applicant is an eligible party, as defined by § 747.602. If the applicant is an individual, he or she must state that his or her net worth does not exceed $2 million. If the applicant is not an individual, it shall state the number of its employees and that its net worth does not exceed $7 million as of the date the proceeding was initiated. However, an applicant may omit a statement of net worth if: ( i ) It attaches a copy of a ruling by the Internal Revenue Service that it qualifies as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) or, in the case of a tax-exempt organization not required to obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service on its exempt status, a statement that describes the basis for the applicant's belief that it qualifies under such section; or
( ii ) It states that it is a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)).
( 4 ) A Statement of the amount of fees and expenses for which an award is sought; and
( 5 ) Any other matters that the applicant believes may assist or wishes the NCUA Board to consider in determining whether and in what amount an award should be made.
( b ) The application shall be signed by the applicant or an authorized officer or attorney of the applicant. It shall also contain or be accompanied by a written verification under oath or under penalty of perjury that the information provided in the application is true and correct.
( c ) The application and documentation requirements of this subpart are required by law as a prerequisite to obtaining a benefit under the EAJA and this subpart.
[56 FR 37767, Aug. 8, 1991; 57 FR 523, Jan. 7, 1992, as amended at 75 FR 34622, June 18, 2010]
BOARDS OF EDUCATION — BIDS.

[Hamilton Circuit Court.]

#### State ex rel. Black v. Board of Education.

Right To Reject Lowest Bid.

Where a board of education advertises for bids and reserves the right “to reject any and all bids,” an alternative writ of mandamus to compel it to execute a contract to the lowest bidder, will not be granted by the court.

*C. W. Baker*and *Bromwell &*Bruce, for Relator.

*C. B.*Matthews, Contra.

Smith, J.

We hold that an alternative writ of mandamus should not be allowed in this case, for the reason that, by the advertisement made for bids, the right was reserved to the board “to reject any and all bids,” and that in fact it did reject the bid of the relator, and he has no right to the contract. If an advertisement was necessary, the statute, section 3988, gives the board such right to reject. If it is not required, it had the right to make such stipulations as it chose. In this the case differs from those decided in 19 O. S., 97, and 31 O. S., 415, in which the statutes under which the proceedings was had required the contract to be made with the lowest bidder. Writ refused.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 89 (Friday, May 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 26559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11081]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

Notice of Open Meeting of the Advisory Committee of the Export-
Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank)

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee was established by Public Law 98-181, 
November 30, 1983, to advise the Export-Import Bank on its programs and 
to provide comments for inclusion in the report on competitiveness of 
the Export-Import Bank of the United States to Congress.
    Time and Place: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 from 11:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m.. 
A break for lunch will be at the expense of the attendee. Security 
processing will be necessary for reentry into the building. The meeting 
will be held at Ex-Im Bank in the Main Conference Room--11th floor, 811 
Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20571.
    Agenda: Discussion of EXIM's Annual Competitiveness Report to 
Congress.
    Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public 
participation, and 10 minutes will be set aside for oral questions or 
comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) 
before or after the meeting. If you plan to attend, a photo ID must be 
presented at the guard's desk as part of the clearance process into the 
building, you may contact Niki Shepperd at niki.shepperd@exim.gov to be 
placed on an attendee list. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such 
as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodations, please 
email Niki Shepperd at niki.shepperd@exim.gov prior to May 13, 2015.
    Members of the Press: For members of the Press planning to attend 
the meeting, a photo ID must be presented at the guard's desk as part 
of the clearance process into the building please email Dolline 
Hatchett at dolline.hatchett@exim.gov to be placed on an attendee list.
    Further Information: For further information, contact Niki 
Shepperd, 811 Vermont Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20571, at 
niki.shepperd@exim.gov

Lloyd Ellis,
Program Specialist, Office of the General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-11081 Filed 5-7-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23269-2 Filed:01/18/23 Entered:01/18/23 14:31:28 Desc:

Exhibit Exhibit B - Obligation and Purchase Order Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal C 363/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 363 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5714 October 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 363

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5714 October 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2014/C 363/01 | Commission communication concerning Article 4(3) of Directive 2009/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on injunctions for the protection of consumers' interests, which codifies Directive 98/27/EC, concerning the entities qualified to bring an action under Article 2 of this Directive (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2014/C 363/01

Commission communication concerning Article 4(3) of Directive 2009/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on injunctions for the protection of consumers' interests, which codifies Directive 98/27/EC, concerning the entities qualified to bring an action under Article 2 of this Directive (1)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN