alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. 

*Docket Number:*                     00-005.                     *Applicant:*                     Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691.                     *Instrument:*                     Electron Microscope, Model H-7500-1.                     *Manufacturer:*                     Hitachi Ltd., Japan.                     *Intended Use:*                     See notice at 65 FR 14245, March 16, 2000.                     *Order Date:*                     October 19, 1999.                 

*Comments:*                     None received.                     *Decision:*                     Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as the instrument is intended to be used, was being manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was ordered.                     *Reasons:*                     The foreign instrument is a conventional transmission electron microscope (CTEM) and is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring a CTEM. We know of no CTEM, or any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in the United States at the time of order of the instrument.                 

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff. 

[FR Doc. 00-10417 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### John J. MacDougall, Administrator, *vs.*The T. A. Scott Company.

* First Judicial District.

Argued May 6th

decided July 16th, 1915.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting in the death of the plaintiff’s intestate and alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence, brought to the Superior Court in New London County and tried to the jury before *Shumway, J.;*verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $2,000, and appeal by the defendant.

*Error and new trial ordered.*

*Arthur M. Brown*and *Charles V. James,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Christopher L. Avery*and *Warren B. Burrows,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*

 Transferred from the second judicial district.

Opinion filed with the clerk of the Superior Court in New London County.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED  JANUARY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                         5,181
<SECURITIES>                                   3,951
<RECEIVABLES>                                  46,394
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,755
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               75,707
<PP&E>                                         7,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          18,041
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8
<OTHER-SE>                                     82,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,334
<SALES>                                        47,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               47,594
<CGS>                                          38,341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               9,398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                114
<INCOME-TAX>                                   52
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            62
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   62
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
§ 615.5200 Capital planning. ( a ) The Board of Directors of each System institution shall determine the amount of regulatory capital needed to assure the System institution's continued financial viability and to provide for growth necessary to meet the needs of its borrowers. The minimum capital standards specified in this part and part 628 of this chapter are not meant to be adopted as the optimal capital level in the System institution's capital adequacy plan. Rather, the standards are intended to serve as minimum levels of capital that each System institution must maintain to protect against the credit and other general risks inherent in its operations.
( b ) Each Board of Directors shall establish, adopt, and maintain a formal written capital adequacy plan as a part of the financial plan required by § 618.8440 of this chapter. The plan shall include the capital targets that are necessary to achieve the System institution's capital adequacy goals as well as the minimum permanent capital, common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital, tier 1 capital, total capital, and tier 1 leverage ratios (including the unallocated retained earnings (URE) and URE equivalents minimum) standards. The plan shall expressly acknowledge the continuing and binding effect of all board resolutions adopted in accordance with § 628.20(b)(1)(xiv), (c)(1)(xiv), and (d)(1)(xi) of this chapter, and with § 628.21 of this chapter. The plan shall address any projected dividend payments, patronage payments, equity retirements, or other action that may decrease the System institution's capital or the components thereof for which minimum amounts are required by this part and part 628 of this chapter. The plan shall set forth the circumstances and minimum timeframes in which equities may be redeemed or revolved consistent with the System institution's applicable bylaws or board of directors' resolutions.
( c ) In addition to factors that must be considered in meeting the minimum standards, the board of directors shall also consider at least the following factors in developing the capital adequacy plan: ( 1 ) Capability of management and the board of directors (the assessment of which may be a part of the assessments required in paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) and (b)(7)(i) of § 618.8440 of this chapter);
( 2 ) Quality of operating policies, procedures, and internal controls;
( 3 ) Quality and quantity of earnings;
( 4 ) Asset quality and the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses to absorb potential loss within the loan and lease portfolios;
( 5 ) Sufficiency of liquid funds;
( 6 ) Needs of a System institution's customer base; and
( 7 ) Any other risk-oriented activities, such as funding and interest rate risks, potential obligations under joint and several liability, contingent and off-balance-sheet liabilities or other conditions warranting additional capital.
[86 FR 54356, Oct. 1, 2021, as amended at 87 FR 27492, May 9, 2022]
ml 4/09

1924yr

800ac

1926yr

540ac

1924yr

160ac

1920yr

508ac

1930yr

701ac

1924yr

106ac

1920yr

99ac

1988yr

28ac

1990yr

26ac

1911yr

162ac

4

Legend

Fires

Sugarpine Bounbary

Hydro Boundary

0 0.3 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4

Miles

Sugar Pine Map 11

Fire History
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1032 PLATE 15

.
rer liao SRSA |S ees ee LLL LAL LNA THT
st el AD perch Ai pty
oO
SAMPLING WIDTHS IN FEET ON SIXTH LEVEL, WOOD VEIN
OUNCES PER TON
Arrow indicates extension beyond limit of 1
ny graph to percent designated 1
tok Hl 4
q
i
ILVER H
I
Al A i |
h | [sitver i
on a WW
ro
; Se = GoLO. he Aunt NA nn on Eat __
OUNCES OF GOLD AND SILVER PER TON ON SIXTH LEVEL, WOOD VEIN
2.7 PERCENT
ea 6.7 PERCENT} { $34 PERCENT 3.7 PERCENT
2.00; i] | ZINC ]
| i [compen Arrow indicates extension beyond limit
| 1 graph to percent designated
ZINCY 4 | J
1.50
| | | [copper
|
1o0}- \
|
LEAD
1 1 \
1 ZINC
0.50F- {4 i f | | |
| If fs a \ ! I H
ili VAiVA LAA “LAMA! j
‘ i} ait f ( A
wad i | | r~~ 1A LWA 33 “ii. dei A VAAN Nal YB AL a aN: Ne NUE AN Long
PERCENT OF COPPER, LEAD, AND ZINC ON SIXTH LEVEL, WOOD VEIN
PERCENT
or MAXIMUM [4 PERCENT URANIUM (16.5 PERCENT UsOe) FOR 0.6.FT
MAXIMUM 3.76 PERCENT URANIUM FOR 0.I7 FT, AVERAGE
1.00; FOR 2.1FT = 0.32 PERCENT URANIUM |
oof a
ooi- |
0.00
PERCENT EQUIVALENT URANIUM OR URANIUM ON SIXTH LEVEL, WOOD VEIN
Oe (U30g = VALUE REPORTED x 1.1793) ; EAST
0.0025 PERCENT URANIUM
aE

| w-ss2-s0s,
wo aen-aos

i
Hi

n ia
‘SIXTH LEVEL

L wan

jy
CROSSCUT

EXPLANATION

wom
Samples collected by A.A. Drake, U.S. Geological Survey

Fa1s075
Samples collected by U.S. Atomic Energy Commission
Samples collected by C.M. Harrer, Defense Minerals
Exploration Administration

520 RAISE

FEET
0

10

sno Hy

He Weill

biti t

S

RAISE SAMPLING WIDTHS IN FEET

$20 RALSE

OUNCES PER TON
°

és °
8 8 2 co} $
6 6 2 Pe) 8
19.84 OZ.
FC
2.44'WIDTH

OUNCES PER TON GOLD, SILVER

520 RAISE

PERCENT

‘store

7
Oo

IXTH LEVEL =

° ° 8
8 ° 8 8 8 8
3 3 E 8 si a
. “4.98 PERCENT FOR GFT a
COPPER
———

Wu 4

6.22 PERCENT FOR 24 FT_—

=

520 RAISE

PERCENT LEAD, ZINC, COPPER

PERCENT OF EQUIVALENT URANIUM REPORTED e 3}
8 cy 2 8 8 3
° o ° = ° 2

0.0025 PERCENT

1

it

URANIUM
MAXIMUM 14 PERCENT URANIUM |
ie sere (16.5 PERCENT “ny =
frien =|
H LEVEL
RAISE SAMPLING AND ASSAY VALUES ON WOOD VEIN

After C.M. Harrer,1953,U.S. Bureau of Mines
Published with the permission of the
Defense Minerals Exploration Administration

VERTICAL LONGITUDINAL SECTION OF THE WOOD VEIN, SHOWING ASSAY VALUES

200 Feet
J

413512 © ~57 (In pocket)
Motion Granted; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Opinion filed 

May 4, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00741-CV

IN RE DOUGLAS SMITH CUSTOM HOMES, LLC; DOUGLAS EUGENE 

SMITH; AND AKEEYA NEAL, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

269th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-00177

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Monday, November 2, 2020, relators Douglas Smith Custom Homes, 

LLC; Douglas Eugene Smith; and Akeeya Neal filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. 

P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable Cory Don 

Sepolio, presiding judge of the 269th District Court of Harris County, to withdraw 

his October 2, 2020 order granting real party in interest’s motion to lift abatement.
2

Because the parties have complied with the requirements of the applicable 

statute in this proceeding since the petition for writ of mandamus was filed, an 

order of statutory abatement will offer no relief to the parties. See Tex. Prop. Code 

§ 27.004. Accordingly, this proceeding has been rendered moot and we must 

dismiss relators’ petition. See Reule v. RLZ Investments, 411 S.W.3d 31, 32 (Tex. 

App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, no pet.) (“If a judgment cannot have a practical 

effect on an existing controversy, the case is moot, and any opinion issued on the 

merits on the appeal would constitute an impermissible advisory opinion.”).

We order the petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
EX-4.2 - 1ST AMEND TO AMEND/RESTATED S/O 1999 PLAN




Exhibit 4.2


FIRST AMENDMENT

to the

RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION

AMENDED AND RESTATED

1999 STOCK OPTION PLAN


      I, Rodney L. Waller, hereby certify that I am the Secretary of Range
Resources Corporation, (the “Company”) and that, as such, I am authorized to
execute this amendment on behalf of the Company, and, DO HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY
THAT the following resolution was duly approved and adopted by the Shareholders
of the Company on May 24, 2001 at the Company’s Annual Meeting of the
Shareholders:



		
	 	      RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors authorizes and approves
an amendment to Article V(a) of the Range Resources Corporation
Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan to increase the amount
of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan from
1,400,000 to 3,400,000 shares.



May 24, 2001



	 	 
		/s/  Rodney L. Waller
		

		Rodney L. Waller

Corporate Secretary



17
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20- 04 12 IN THE MATTER OF THE MENTAL HEALTH OF: T.A., Respondent and Appellant . **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 30, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 24 2021

05/24/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0412
# Official Journal L 234/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 234 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6118 September 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 234

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6118 September 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1239 of 9 July 2018 amending Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the citizens’ initiative | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1239 of 9 July 2018 amending Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the citizens’ initiative

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3738 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3738

    To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for immediate 
 implementation of full concurrent receipt for retired members of the 
 Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability of both military 
   retired pay paid by reason of their years of military service and 
disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs paid by 
                      reason of their disability.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2004

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on 
 Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for immediate 
 implementation of full concurrent receipt for retired members of the 
 Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability of both military 
   retired pay paid by reason of their years of military service and 
disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs paid by 
                      reason of their disability.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the `` Immediate and Full Repeal of the 
Disabled Veterans Tax Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. IMMEDIATE IMPLEMENTATION OF FULL CONCURRENT RECEIPT.

    (a) Revisions to Fiscal Year 2004 Amendments.--Section 1414 of 
title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 641(a) of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 
108-136; 117 Stat. 1511), is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking the second 
                sentence; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``50 percent'' 
                and inserting ``10 percent'';
            (2) by striking subsection (c); and
            (3) in subsection (e), by striking paragraphs (3) and (4).
    (b) Clerical Amendments.--(1) The heading for such section is 
amended by striking ``for disabilities rated 50 percent or higher''.
    (2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 71 of such 
title is amended by striking ``for disabilities rated 50 percent or 
higher''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the first day of the first month beginning on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to 
payments for months beginning on or after that day.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1215.109 Scheduling user service. ( a ) User service shall be scheduled only by NASA. TDRSS services will be provided in accordance with operational priorities established by the NASA Administrator or his/her designee. See Appendix A for a description of a typical user activity timeline.
( b ) Schedule conflict will be resolved in general by application of principles of priority to user service requirements. Services shall be provided either as normally scheduled service or as emergency service. Priorities will be different for emergency service than for normal services. ( 1 ) Normally scheduled service is service which is planned and ordered under normal operational conditions and is subject to schedule conflict resolution under normal service priorities. Requests for normally scheduled service must be received by the schedulers at the GSFC WSC Data Services Management Center (DSMC) no later than 21 days prior to the requested support time.
( 2 ) At times, emergency service requirements will override normal schedule priority. Under emergency service conditions, disruptions to scheduled service will occur.
( 3 ) The DSMC reserves the sole right to schedule, reschedule, or cancel TDRSS service.
( 4 ) NASA schedulers will exercise judgment and endeavor to see that lower-priority users are not excluded from a substantial portion of their contracted-for service due to the requirements of higher-priority users.
( c ) General user service requirements, which will be used for preliminary planning and mission modeling, should include all pertinent information necessary for NASA to determine if the proposed service is achievable. Contact Near Space Network to discuss usage and requirements.
( d ) Such user service requirements information typically includes: ( 1 ) Date of service initiation.
( 2 ) The type of TDRSS services desired (e.g., multiple access, tracking, *etc.*), and the frequency and duration of each service.
( 3 ) Orbit or trajectory parameters and tracking data requirements.
( 4 ) Spacecraft events significant to tracking, telemetry or command requirements.
( 5 ) Communications systems specifics, including location of antennas and other related information dealing with user tracking, command, and data systems.
( 6 ) Special test requirements, data flows, and simulations, *etc.*
( 7 ) Identification of terrestrial data transport requirements, interface points, and delivery locations, including latency and line loss recovery.
( e ) To provide for effective planning, reference Appendix A, Typical New User Activity Timeline.
[77 FR 6953, Feb. 10, 2012, as amended at 86 FR 60566, Nov. 3, 2021]
No. 76-6283.

#### Barry *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Icagen, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Richard D. Katz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Dated: March 7, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard D. Katz    
|                     |  |  |  | Richard D. Katz, M.D.  
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer