alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 369

To waive time limitations specified by law in order to allow the Medal 

of Honor to be awarded to Gary Lee McKiddy, of Miamisburg, Ohio, 

for acts of valor while a helicopter crew chief and door gunner with 

the 1st Cavalry Division during the Vietnam War. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2003

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL

To waive time limitations specified by law in order to allow 

the Medal of Honor to be awarded to Gary Lee McKiddy, 

of Miamisburg, Ohio, for acts of valor while a helicopter 

crew chief and door gunner with the 1st Cavalry Division 

during the Vietnam War.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO AWARD MEDAL OF HONOR TO 

4 GARY LEE MCKIDDY FOR VALOR DURING THE 

5 VIETNAM WAR. 

6 (a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwith7 standing the time limitations in section 3744(b) of title 
2

•HR 369 IH 

1 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation, the 

2 President is authorized and requested to award the Medal 

3 of Honor under section 3741 of such title to Gary Lee 

4 McKiddy, of Miamisburg, Ohio, for the acts of valor re5 ferred to in subsection (b). 

6 (b) ACTION DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred 

7 to in subsection (a) are the conspicuous acts of gallantry 

8 and intrepidity at the risk of his life and beyond the call 

9 of duty of Gary Lee McKiddy, between October 25, 1969, 

10 and May 6, 1970, and particularly on May 6, 1970, the 

11 day he died during a combat operation in Cambodia while 

12 serving as a Specialist Four in the 1st Cavalry Division 

13 of the United States Army. 

14 (c) POSTHUMOUS AWARD.—The Medal of Honor may 

15 be awarded under this section posthumously as provided 

16 in section 3752 of title 10, United States Code.

Æ
427 A.2d 248

#### Wenk v. Wenk, Appellant.

Argued March 3, 1980.

John R. White, for appellant;

Chester G. Schultz, for appellee.

*627Before CERCONE, P.J., and WATKINS and MONTGOMERY, JJ.

Order affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.4****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements ofPost Properties, Inc. and Post Apartment Homes, L.P., of our report dated March 15, 2006, exceptwith respect to our opinion on the consolidated financial statements insofar as it relates to theeffects of the discontinued operations discussed in Note 2, as to which the date is December 8,2006, and insofar as it relates to the effects of changes in segmentreporting categories discussed in Note 15, as to which date is February 28, 2007, relatingto the financial statements and the summary of activity for the real estate investments and accumulated depreciation included in the financial statement schedule, which appear in thisForm 10-K.Form S-3 (No. 333-36595)
### Seaside, Oregon, Tsunami Pilot Study— Modernization of FEMA flood hazard maps: GIS data

By: Florence L. Wong**Angie J. VenturatoEric L. Geist**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds236

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3 v. No. 34,472 4 TAYLOR CRABB, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TORRANCE COUNTY 7 Mercedes C. Murphy, District Judge 8 Hector Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 for Plaintiff-Appellee 11 Taylor Crabb 12 Hobbs, NM 13 Pro Se Appellant 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION 15 VIGIL, Chief Judge. 162 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 2 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. 3 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 4

_______________________________ 5 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7

___________________________________ 8 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 9

_________________________________ 10 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 11
# Official Journal C 18/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2014.018.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 18 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5721 January 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2014.018.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 18

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5721 January 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2014/C 018/01 | Fifteenth Annual Report according to Article 8(2) of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2014/C 018/01

Fifteenth Annual Report according to Article 8(2) of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### KINGSBURY *v.*PHELPS’S ADMINISTRATOR.

Pledge — interest Qf the pledgee — statute of limitations as to parties.

Where notes and other choses in action have been given to a person to indemnify him for having gone security for the pledger, with an agreement they should be the pioperty of the security if he was made liable, the security does not hold the notes absolutely, but as indemnity and is liable to account.

• The equity of the statute of limitations, does not apply to trust property, between the cestui que trust and the trustee.

In Chancery. The complainant claims that one G. Pease placed in Phelps’s hands, securities to a large amount, to indemnify him for going security for him for $2300, and agreed that if he, Phelps, was made liable, the notes, &c. should be his, but if not made liable, that he should account for them. The interest of Pease in the agreement is now in the complainant, and he now calls for an account.

The answer of the defendant admits the surety, and the delivery of the notes, as set forth, but asserts ignorance of the assignment to *371the complainant, and claims the- obligations to be his own property, as the intestate had paid sundry sums for Pease: it also insists that the demand is a stale one.

*Webb*and P. Hitchcock, for the complainants.

*Newton*and Perkins, for the defendants.

By the Court.

It appears that sundry demands were given to Phelps, to indemnify him for going security, under an agreement, that if Phelps had to pay, the demands should be his own.

It is well settled, that the *property*in a pledge for indemnity,-is not changed absolutely by the pledge. In such cases as in mortgages, the pledgee or mortgagee is held subject to account,whatever may be the *form*of the contract. Such is the *apparent*right of the complainant here.

It is. said the claim is a stale one, and is within the equity of the statute of limitations. That statute does not apply between a trustee and a *cestui que*trust, which is the case before us. The case is one of trust property in the hands of the defendant’s intestate, and seems a proper one for an account before a master, where the claims can be examined; and it is referred to a master for account.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3597

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, through

fornia, and for other purposes.conservation project in El Dorado County, Calibility study on the Alder Creek water storage andthe Bureau of Reclamation, to conduct a feasi-

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3597

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Reclamation, to conduct a feasibility study on

the Alder Creek water storage and conservation project

in El Dorado County, California, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3597 EH

1 SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT.

2 (a) STUDY.—Pursuant to the Reclamation Act of

3 1902 (32 Stat. 388) and Acts amendatory thereof and

4 supplemental thereto, the Secretary of the Interior (re5 ferred to in this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’), through the

6 Bureau of Reclamation, and in consultation and coopera7 tion with the El Dorado Irrigation District, is authorized

8 to conduct a study to determine the feasibility of con9 structing a project on Alder Creek in El Dorado County,

10 California, to store water and provide water supplies dur11 ing dry and critically dry years for consumptive use, recre12 ation, in-stream flows, irrigation, and power production.

13 (b) REPORT.—

14 (1) TRANSMISSION.—Upon completion of the

15 study authorized by subsection (a), the Secretary

16 shall transmit to the Committee on Resources of the

17 House of Representatives and the Committee on En18 ergy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report

19 containing the results of the study.

20 (2) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—The report shall

21 contain appropriate cost sharing options for the im22 plementation of the project based upon the use and

23 possible allocation of any stored water.

24 (3) USE OF AVAILABLE MATERIALS.—In devel25 oping the report under this section, the Secretary
3

•HR 3597 EH

1 shall use reports and any other relevant information

2 supplied by the El Dorado Irrigation District.

3 (c) COST SHARE.—

4 (1) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of

5 the costs of the feasibility study authorized by this

6 section shall not exceed 50 percent of the total cost

7 of the study.

8 (2) IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION FOR NON-FEDERAL

9 SHARE.—The Secretary may accept as part of the

10 non-Federal cost share the contribution such in-kind

11 services by the El Dorado Irrigation District as the

12 Secretary determines will contribute to the conduct

13 and completion of the study.

14 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is

15 authorized to be appropriated $3,000,000 to carry out this

16 section.

Passed the House of Representatives September 28,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
LIENS — RELEASE.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

February, 1896.]

Smith, Swing and Cox, JJ.

#### Yanney, Guardian, v. Hine.

In order to Constitute a Good Redease oe a Lien, a Consideration is Necessary.

The plaintiff in this case sought to have an annuity, payable in equal oharco, by the heirs of Jacob Yanney, Sr., declared to be a lien on premises devised to said heirs (five grandchildren). The answer set up a *paper*signed by the an- , nuitant which it was claimed was a release of the specific lien charged by the will upon the property. To this defense the plaintiff demurred.

*Stanley Struble,*for Plaintiff.

*John Davis*and ,S". *B. Carter, contra.*

Smith, J.

We are of the opinion that in the action of the court of common pleas in overruling the demurrer filed by the plaintiff to the answer of the defendant, and in dismissing the petition of the plaintiff, there was error for which the judgment should be reversed. It is an elementary principle that to constitute a good release a consideration is necessary, and without this it is a *nudum pactum.*In the release pleaded in this case by the answer of the defendant, no consideration is stated or shown, and the answer does not allege any. In addition to this a paper called a release was given to a person, who herself was in no wise under any obligation to make any payment to the releasor, and had no interest whatever in the lands of her children which were charged with the payment.

The facts alleged in the answer did not, if true, estop the plaintiff from recovering in the action. The fact that the paper in question, after its delivery to the mother of the children, had been shown by her to a person who afterwards bought the land charged with the payment, at a sale thereof in partition, did not have this effect. If the representation had been made to him by the releasor herself, that she had released the persons bound to make payment, and the purchaser had relied upon, and acted upon this representation, the case might have been different. But this does not appear by the answer.

The judgment will, therefore, be reversed, and the case remanded for such further proceedings as may be warranted by law.
§ 111.250 Correction of reported information and dispute resolution. ( a ) A reporting entity that discovers or is informed of a perceived error or inaccuracy in information previously reported to the PRD must correct that record in the PRD within 10 days of identification, or initiate dispute resolution in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Each reporting entity must— ( 1 ) Initiate investigation of any dispute within 30 days of determining that it does not agree that the record identified is inaccurate.
( 2 ) Provide final disposition within a reasonable amount of time to any request for dispute resolution made by an individual about PRD records.
( 3 ) Document in the PRD the final disposition of any dispute made by a pilot in accordance with this paragraph (b) and § 111.320.
###### Editorial Note on Part 745

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 745 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 745.0 Scope.

The regulation and appendix contained in this part describe the insurance coverage of various types of member accounts. In general, all types of member share accounts received by the credit union in its usual course of business, including regular shares, share certificates, and share draft accounts, represent equity and are insured. For the purposes of applying the rules in this part, it is presumed that the owner of funds in an account is an insured credit union member or otherwise eligible to maintain an insured account in a credit union. These rules do not extend insurance coverage to persons not entitled to maintain an insured account or to account relationships that have not been approved by the Board as an insured account. Where there are multiple owners of a single account, generally only that part which is allocable to the member(s) is insured.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10406]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, Sibling Donor Cord Blood Banking and 
Transplantation.
    Date: May 9, 2000.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge II, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Robert B. Moore, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Rockledge 
Building II, Suite 7192, MSC 7924, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, 
MD 20892, 301/435-3541.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 19, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-10406 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 791.3 Voting by proxy.

Proxy voting shall not be allowed for any action by the Board.
# Official Journal L 133/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.133.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 133 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5331 May 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.133.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 133

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5331 May 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 453/2010 of 20 May 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 453/2010 of 20 May 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 1203.100 Legal basis. ( a ) *Executive Order 13526 (hereinafter referred to as “the Order”).* The responsibilities and authority of the Administrator of NASA with respect to the original classification of official information or material requiring protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interest of national defense or foreign relations of the United States (hereinafter collectively termed “national security”), and the standards for such classification, are established by the “the Order” and the Information Security Oversight Office Directive No. 1, as amended (32 CFR part 2001, “Classified National Security Information”);
( b ) *E.O. 10865.* Executive Order 10865 (24 FR 1583) requires the Administrator to prescribe by regulation such specific requirements, restrictions and other safeguards as the Administrator may consider necessary to protect: ( 1 ) Releases of classified information to or within United States industry that relate to contracts with NASA; and
( 2 ) Other releases of classified information to industry that NASA has responsibility for safeguarding.
( c ) *The National Aeronautics and Space Act.* ( 1 ) The National Aeronautics and Space Act (51 U.S.C. 20113) (Hereafter referred to as, “The Space Act”), states: The Administrator shall establish such security requirements, restrictions, and safeguards as he deems necessary in the interest of the national security * * *
( 2 ) Section 303 of the Space Act states:
Information obtained or developed by the Administrator in the performance of his functions under this Act shall be made available for public inspection, except (i) information authorized or required by Federal statute to be withheld, and (ii) information classified to protect the national security: *Provided,* That nothing in this Act shall authorize the withholding of information by the Administrator from the duly authorized committees of the Congress.
[44 FR 34913, June 18, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 5889, Feb. 9, 1983; 64 FR 72535, Dec. 28, 1999; 78 FR 5117, Jan. 24, 2013]
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                              COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the periods indicated below were as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                52 WEEKS      52 WEEKS     52 WEEKS      52 WEEKS      44 WEEKS
                                                  ENDED        ENDED         ENDED         ENDED        ENDED
                                                ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                JUNE 28,      JUNE 29,     JUNE 30,       JULY 1,      JULY 3,
                                                  2003          2002         2001          2000          1999
                                                ---------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                             <C>           <C>          <C>           <C>           <C>
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 -----         -----        -----         -----         -----

Deficiency in the coverage of fixed charges     $ 15,702      $ 80,009     $ 11,985      $ 16,539      $    827
by earnings (in thousands of dollars)
</TABLE>

For purposes of calculating the above ratios, earnings are defined as income
before income taxes and extraordinary items, plus fixed charges. Fixed charges
consists of interest expense on all indebtedness, amortization of deferred
financing costs, and one-third of rental expense on operating leases
representing that portion of rental expense deemed by the Company to be
attributable to interest. The ratio of earnings to fixed charges equals earnings
divided by fixed charges.
#### James W. Holloway, Appellant, *v.*Frederick Schmidt et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, tenth district, borough of Manhattan.

James A. Peering, for appellant.

Arnow & Cryer, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The words “ first privilege of a renewal ”, as used in the lease, meant the prior right to a lease of five years upon terms the same as those in the lease of 1895, provided the landlord should give a lease.

This construction seems reasonable, particularly in view of the evidence of Mrs. Schmidt that when the lease was first made and her husband came down, Mr. Peering said “we don’t give no ten years ”.

The order is reversed, with costs. An order of dispossession will be granted.

Present: Tbuax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.

Order reversed, with costs. Order of dispossession granted.