alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 793.2 Administrative claim; when presented; place of filing. ( a ) For purposes of the regulations in this part, a claim shall be deemed to have been presented when the National Credit Union Administration receives, at a place designated in paragraph (b) of this section, an executed Standard Form 95 or other written notification of an incident accompanied by a claim for money damages in a sum certain for damage to or loss of property, for personal injury, or for death, alleged to have occurred by reason of the incident. A claim which should have been presented to the National Credit Union Administration but which was mistakenly addressed to or filed with another Federal agency, shall be deemed to be presented to the National Credit Union Administration as of the date that the claim is received by the National Credit Union Administration. A claim mistakenly addressed to or filed with the National Credit Union Administration shall forthwith be transferred to the appropriate Federal agency, if ascertainable, or returned to the claimant.
( b ) A claim presented in compliance with paragraph (a) of this section may be amended by the claimant at any time prior to final action by the Office of General Counsel, National Credit Union Administration or prior to the exercise of the claimant's option to bring suit under 28 U.S.C. 2675(a). Amendments shall be submitted in writing and signed by the claimant or his duly authorized agent or legal representative. Upon the timely filing of an amendment to a pending claim, the National Credit Union Administration shall have 6 months in which to make a final disposition of the claim as amended and the claimant's option under 28 U.S.C. 2675(a) shall not accrue until 6 months after the filing of an amendment.
( c ) Forms may be obtained and claims may be filed with the regional office of the National Credit Union Administration having jurisdiction over the employee involved in the accident or incident, or with the Office of General Counsel, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.
[37 FR 5928, Mar. 23, 1972. Redesignated at 49 FR 559, Jan. 5, 1984, and amended at 59 FR 36041, July 15, 1994]
§ 336.12 One-year post-employment restriction. ( a ) *Prohibition.* An officer or employee of the FDIC who serves as a senior examiner of an insured depository institution for at least 2 months during the last 12 months of that individual's employment with the FDIC may not, within 1 year after the termination date of his or her employment with the FDIC, knowingly accept compensation as an employee, officer, director, or consultant from— ( 1 ) The insured depository institution; or
( 2 ) Any company (including a bank holding company or savings and loan holding company) that controls such institution.
( b ) *Waivers.* The post-employment restrictions in paragraph (a) of this section will not apply to a senior examiner if the FDIC Chairperson certifies in writing and on a case-by case basis that a waiver of the restrictions will not affect the integrity of the FDIC's supervisory program.
( c ) *Effective Date.* The post-employment restrictions in paragraph (a) of this section will not apply to any officer or employee of the FDIC, or any former officer or employee of the FDIC, who ceased to be an officer or employee of the FDIC before December 17, 2005.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 28 , 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 11

- 00849

- CR

IRAN LOVINGS , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 791336

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for post

- conviction DNA testing. 1
Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which s he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit

. The brief meets the requirement of

1 The underlying offense was sexual assault.2

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
However, appellant has not been provided a copy of the brief and the motion
to withdraw nor informed of h is right to file h is own brief. See Stafford v. State
, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. (Tex. Crim. App.1991). Counsel has advised the cou rt that a ppellant has been released on parole and failed to provide counsel with an address. Counsel has attempted to contact appellant though his parole officer but has been unable to do so. Appellant’s fail ure to keep his attorney informed of his

curr ent address forfeits the right to receive a copy of the Anders brief and file a pro
se brief. In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 408 n. 21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivo lous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in
the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe
v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 8 27

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally.

Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3504 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3504

To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
 redesignate the American Indian Education Foundation as the National 
           Fund for Excellence in American Indian Education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2003

  Mr. Renzi introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the 
 Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
 redesignate the American Indian Education Foundation as the National 
           Fund for Excellence in American Indian Education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN EDUCATION FOUNDATION.

    (a) Redesignation.--Section 501(a) of title V of the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 458bbb(a)), as 
added by Public Law 106-568, is amended by striking ``the American 
Indian Education Foundation'' and inserting ``a foundation to be known 
as the `National Fund for Excellence in American Indian Education' 
(hereinafter referred to as the `Foundation')''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Title V of the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 458bbb), as added 
by Public Law 106-568, is amended--
            (1) in the heading to read as follows:

``TITLE V--NATIONAL FUND FOR EXCELLENCE IN AMERICAN INDIAN EDUCATION'';

        and
            (2) in the heading of section 501 to read as follows:

``SEC. 501. NATIONAL FUND FOR EXCELLENCE IN AMERICAN INDIAN 
              EDUCATION.''.

                                 <all>
```
Schedule A

Actions to be Transferred to the Avoidance Actions Trust

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23663-1 Filed:03/01/23 Entered:03/01/23 23:30:40 Desc:

Schedule A Page 1 of 2
2

Actions to be Transferred to the Avoidance Actions Trust1

VENDOR NAME ADVERSARY PROCEEDING NO.

Core Laboratories N.V. d/b/a Saybolt 19-381

Puerto Nuevo Security Guards, Inc. 19-384

 1 The actions to be transferred to the Avoidance Actions Trust include, but are not limited to, the actions listed on 

this Exhibit.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23663-1 Filed:03/01/23 Entered:03/01/23 23:30:40 Desc:

Schedule A Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

OPTi Inc.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of OPTi Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal
year ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report). I, Michael Mazzoni, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                         |  |       |  |           
|---------------------------------------- |  | ----- |  | ----------
|/s/ Michael Mazzoni                      |  | Date: |  | 12/10/2010
|Michael Mazzoni, Chief Financial Officer |  |       |  |
# Official Journal C 77/30 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 77 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4930 March 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 77

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4930 March 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 077/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 077/2 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 2 |
| 2006/C 077/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4142 — Time Warner/CBS/JV) (1) | 8 |
| 2006/C 077/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4103 — EnBW/SWD) (1) | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 077/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 077/2

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

2

2006/C 077/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4142 — Time Warner/CBS/JV) (1)

8

2006/C 077/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4103 — EnBW/SWD) (1)

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, OF PIKE COUNTY *v.*SERGEANT AND CHENOWITH, SURVIVOR OF CHENOWITH.

Pleading — inducement—inuendo—jurisdiction where the court is a party.

Where the right of action depends upon extrinsic matter, the declaration discloses no title to recover unless such matter be introduced by way of inducement; the ajlusion to it by way of inuendo is not sufficient.

Qwere, if the Court of Common Pleas can hold jurisdiction of a case in which they are parties.

Debt. The writ was issued in the Court of Common Pleas, and returned, *served*as to Chenowith, and not found as to Sergeant. The declaration is upon a penal bond- for $>4000, dated the 17th April, 1835, and conditioned that Sergeant should perform his duties as director of the town of Piketon. The breaches assigned are, the neglect of duty, and the receipt of money which had not been paid over.

The defendant demurred generally.

Bond, for the demurrant,

contended that the declaration did not aver that Sergeant had been appointed director of any place. There is no inducement, or any thing showing either that the office of director had been created, or that Sergeant had been appointed to fill it; and therefore no title to recover is shown.

2. There is a want of jurisdiction;, for the Court of Common Pleas could have none, where ,it was a party. He cited 14 O. *L. Rep.*257, 8.

*S. M. Tracy*and *Douglas,*contra,

insisted that the averment (by way of inuendo) was sufficient to show the creation of the office and the officer, as it referred to the statute.

2. That the act of assembly expressly authorizes the Court of Common Pleas to take the bond, and gives no direction who shall be the obligee; of course they may take it to themselves.

3. The Court of Common Pleas are a *corporation,*and as such may perform the duties assigned them,- and hold jurisdiction of suits in their own name. They cited 1 *O. R.*176; 4 *O. L.*164.

By the Court.

The declaration lays no *inducement*to the introduction of the bond and breach. The condition of the bond recites that he was appointed a *director,*the pleader adds in the declaration, *(meaning of the town of*Piketon,) as an inuendo is inserted in a count in slander. The rule is, that where the right of action depends upon extrinsic matter, that matter must be shown by aver*483snent as inducement; this is not done in the case before us. The imuendo does not operate as an averment, or supply its plaee. The declaration is therefore bad. There is difficulty as to the Common Pleas holding jurisdiction of a case in which it is a party — one cannot sit as a judge in his own case.

We give leave to amend, on payment of costs, to supply the averment and reserve the case upon the other points to bank.
# Official Journal C 338/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.338.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 338 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5619 November 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.338.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 338

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5619 November 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | RESOLUTIONS |
| | EURONEST Parliamentary Assembly |
| 2013/C 338/01 | Resolution on regional security challenges in Eastern European partner countries | 1 |
| 2013/C 338/02 | Resolution on approximation of the national legislation of Eastern Partnership countries with EU legislation in the economic field | 10 |
| 2013/C 338/03 | Resolution on energy security in connection with energy market and harmonisation between the Eastern European partner and the EU countries | 15 |
| 2013/C 338/04 | Resolution on combating poverty and social exclusion in the Eastern Partner countries | 24 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

RESOLUTIONS

EURONEST Parliamentary Assembly

2013/C 338/01

Resolution on regional security challenges in Eastern European partner countries

1

2013/C 338/02

Resolution on approximation of the national legislation of Eastern Partnership countries with EU legislation in the economic field

10

2013/C 338/03

Resolution on energy security in connection with energy market and harmonisation between the Eastern European partner and the EU countries

15

2013/C 338/04

Resolution on combating poverty and social exclusion in the Eastern Partner countries

24

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32(b)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Amendment  No.  1  to  Quarterly  Report  of  PREMIER
EXHIBITIONS,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on November 5, 2004,
(the  "Report"),  I, Gerald  Couture,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Gerald Couture
-------------------------
Gerald  Couture
Chief Financial Officer
November 5, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3490 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3490

To eliminate the requirement that the Public Printer make an additional 
 contribution to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund with 
 respect to each employee of the Government Printing Office to whom a 
         voluntary separation incentive payment has been paid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2003

  Mr. Ney (for himself and Mr. Larson of Connecticut) introduced the 
     following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 
Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To eliminate the requirement that the Public Printer make an additional 
 contribution to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund with 
 respect to each employee of the Government Printing Office to whom a 
         voluntary separation incentive payment has been paid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO RETIREMENT FUND 
              BY PUBLIC PRINTER FOR EMPLOYEES RECEIVING VOLUNTARY 
              SEPARATION INCENTIVE PAYMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 309(c) of the Legislative Branch 
Appropriations Act, 1999 (44 U.S.C. 305 note) is amended by striking 
paragraph (5).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to voluntary separation incentive payments made on 
or after April 1, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT A

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23986-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 20:26:14 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23986-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 20:26:14 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23986-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 20:26:14 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 3 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23986-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 20:26:14 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 4 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23986-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 20:26:14 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 5 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23986-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 20:26:14 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 6 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23986-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 20:26:14 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 7 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23986-1 Filed:04/11/23 Entered:04/11/23 20:26:14 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 8 of 8
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.609 Filing and service of applications. ( a ) An application may be filed whenever the applicant has prevailed in the proceeding or in a significant and discrete substantive portion of the proceeding, but in no case later than 30 days after the Board's final disposition of the proceeding.
( b ) If review or reconsideration is sought or taken of a decision on which an applicant believes it has prevailed, proceedings for the award of fees shall be stayed pending final disposition of the underlying controversy.
( c ) As used in this subpart, final disposition means the issuance of a final order or any other final resolution of a proceeding, such as a settlement or voluntary dismissal.
( d ) Any application for an award of fees and expenses shall be filed with the Secretary of the Board, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428. Any application for an award and any other pleading or document related to an application, shall be filed and served on all parties to the proceeding in the same manner as other pleadings in the proceeding, except as provided in § 747.607(a) for statements of net worth.
[56 FR 37767, Aug. 8, 1991, as amended at 59 FR 36041, July 15, 1994]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-09-026]

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission.

# Time and Date: 

October 13, 2009 at 2 p.m.

# Place: 

                        Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,                         *Telephone:*                         (202) 205-2000.                    

# Status: 

Open to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

1. Agenda for future meetings: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-753, 754, and 756 (Second Review) (Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from China, Russia, and Ukraine)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determinations and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before October 26, 2009.)

5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

Issued: October 5, 2009.

By order of the Commission.

William R. Bishop,

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.

[FR Doc. E9-24499 Filed 10-7-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We have
issued our report dated March 11, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial
statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Innodata Isogen, Inc.
and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of Innodata Isogen, Inc. on Form S-8 (Registration
No. 33-85530, dated October 21, 1994, Registration No. 333-3464, dated
April 18, 1996, Registration No. 33-63085, dated September 9, 1998,
Registration No. 333-82185, dated July 2, 1999, and Registration No.
333-118506, dated August 24, 2004) and on Form S-3 (Registration
No. 33-62012, dated April 11, 1996, Registration
No. 333-91649, dated November 24, 1999 and Registration No. 333-51400,
dated December 7, 2000).





/s/ GRANT
THORNTON LLP





Edison,
New Jersey


March 9,
2009