alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STEWART *v.*SAYBROOK TOWNSHIP.

Trustees witnesses — accord and satisfaction — receipt of treasurer — evidence of payment.

The trustees of townships, though parties to the suit in their official capacity, are competent witnesses, if they have no individual interest in the controversy.

Accord and satisfaction is admissible in evidence under the general issue in assumpsit.

The receipt of the treasurer of a corporation as money, is prima facie evidence of payment to that amount.

Error to the Common Pleas. The record shows that the proceedings were brought into the Court of Common Pleas on a certiorari to a justice of the peace, and the cause being docketed under the statute, the plaintiff declared in assumpsit. On the trial, the court admitted as witnesses for the defendant, two of the trustees of the township,who were objected to by the plaintiff The court, in like manner, admitted evidence for the defendant, to prove that *375there was a subsequent agreement to take five dollars, which was less than the sum due, in satisfaction, and the payment of that sum. Exceptions were sealed to thesei admissions, and it is assigned for error, that the evidence was improperly admitted. There was judgment for the defendant.

*Whittlesey*and Newton, for the plaintiff in error.

*Giddings*and *Wade,*for the defendant.

Wright, J.

Were the trustees illegally admitted to testify for the defendants? In *The Methodist Church of Cincinnati*v. *Wood, 5 O.R.*284, this Court expressly decided that members of a public corporation, though parties to the record, are competent witnesses, if they have no individual interest. That is the same question decided by the Common Pleas.

Was the evidence of the accord and satisfaction admissible under the general issue? We have no doubt it was. But, it is said, there is no evidence of payment; or, if so, it was of less sum than was due. The receipt of the treasurer as money, is money quoad the amount expressed in it. Whether it satisfied the whole debt, or only part of it, is a question not presented on this record.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3664

To prohibit certain abortion-related discrimination in governmental activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2003

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mr. 

BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, 

Mr. PICKERING, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. PITTS, 

Mr. UPTON, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. BURR, and Mr. HALL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To prohibit certain abortion-related discrimination in 

governmental activities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Abortion Non-Dis5 crimination Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ABORTION NON-DISCRIMINATION. 

7 Section 245 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 238n) is amended—
2

•HR 3664 IH 

1 (1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘RE2 GARDING TRAINING AND LICENSING OF PHYSICIANS’’ 

3 and inserting ‘‘REGARDING TRAINING, LICENSING, 

4 AND PRACTICE OF PHYSICIANS AND OTHER HEALTH

5 CARE ENTITIES’’; 

6 (2) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘to perform 

7 such abortions’’ and inserting ‘‘to perform, provide 

8 coverage of, or pay for induced abortions’’; and 

9 (3) in subsection (c)(2)—

10 (A) by inserting ‘‘or other health profes11 sional,’’ after ‘‘an individual physician’’; 

12 (B) by striking ‘‘and a participant’’ and in13 serting ‘‘a participant’’; and 

14 (C) by inserting before the period the fol15 lowing: ‘‘, a hospital, a provider sponsored orga16 nization, a health maintenance organization, a 

17 health insurance plan, or any other kind of 

18 health care facility, organization or plan’’.

Æ
###### Editorial Note on Part 747

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 747.3006 Conservatorship or liquidation of critically undercapitalized corporate credit union.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, the NCUA may, without any administrative due process, immediately place into conservatorship or liquidation any corporate credit union that has been categorized as critically undercapitalized.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00090-CR

LaJarvis Terrell Nelson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 49127, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant LaJarvis Terrell Nelson was placed on deferred adjudication community

supervision after he pleaded guilty to aggravated assault. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.02 (West

Supp. 2004-05). The State later moved to adjudicate. Following a hearing at which appellant

admitted the allegations in the motion, the court adjudged him guilty and sentenced him to four years

in prison.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573

S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
2

Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to

examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: August 10, 2005

Do Not Publish
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-62243, 333-38725, 333-107092, 333-125390, 333-127580, 333-157666 and 333-163894 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Nos.33-81772, 333-44722 and 333-80427 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-163895 on Form S-3ASR of our report dated February 26, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of PostProperties, Inc., and the effectiveness of Post Properties, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Post Properties, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

February 26, 2010
¤£

§ ̈¦

Bundy Road

I-94

4th

st

2

1

US 31

3

Sherrod

ht43

notloC

keerCy lF

Lower Canal

Special Designations 

Pompeys Pillar National 

Monument and ACEC

Alternative A

R30E

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Miles

Map 157

90

Y l l o w s t o n e R i v e r

e

T

3

N

Map scale 1:24,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in May 2015

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Pompeys P i llar Cree k

312

94

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Wyoming

Legend Location Map

Montana

Billings 

Field 

Office

Ü

Pompeys Pillar National Monument

Historic (Natural) Zone

Historic (Developed) Zone

General Management Zone

Roads

Streams

Public Lands Survey System

Bureau of Land Management

Water

Private
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22665-2 Filed:10/20/22 Entered:10/21/22 13:02:40 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal L 61/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 61 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 598 March 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 61

English edition

Legislation

Volume 598 March 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/324 of 7 March 2016 amending and correcting Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the use of certain food additives permitted in all categories of foods (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/325 of 7 March 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 5 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/324 of 7 March 2016 amending and correcting Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the use of certain food additives permitted in all categories of foods (
  1
  )

1

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/325 of 7 March 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

5

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 1203.400 Specific classifying guidance. Technological and operational information and material, and in some exceptional cases scientific information falling within any one or more of the following categories, must be classified if its unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause some degree of damage to the national security. In cases where it is believed that a contrary course of action would better serve the national interests, the matter should be referred to the Chairperson, NISPC, for a determination. It is not intended that this list be exclusive; original classifiers are responsible for initially classifying any other type of information which, in their judgment, requires protection under § 1.4 of “the Order.” ( a ) Military plans, weapons systems, or operations;
( b ) Foreign government information;
( c ) Intelligence activities (including covert activities), intelligence sources or methods, or cryptology;
( d ) Foreign relations or foreign activities of the United States, including confidential sources;
( e ) Scientific, technological, or economic matters relating to the national security;
( f ) United States Government programs for safeguarding nuclear materials or facilities;
( g ) Vulnerabilities or capabilities of systems, installations, infrastructures, projects, plans, or protection services relating to the national security; or
( h ) The development, production, or plans relating to the use of weapons of mass destruction.
[78 FR 5118, Jan. 24, 2013]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1188/2006

of 3 August 2006         

amending the representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1002/2006 for the 2006/2007 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 951/2006 of 30 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 as regards trade with third countries in the sugar sector (2), and in particular of the Article 36,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The representative prices and additional duties on imports of the products referred to in Article 36 of Regulation (EC) No 951/2006, as fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1002/2006 for the 2006/2007 marketing year are hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 August 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 August 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 55, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 178, 1.7.2006, p. 24.

(3)OJ L 178, 1.7.2006, p. 36.

(4)OJ L 211, 1.8.2006, p. 20.

----

ANNEX

Amended representative prices and additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 1702 90 99  applicable from 4 August 2006

----

(1)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.III to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 (OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1).

(2)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.II to Regulation (EC) No 318/2006.

(3)  Fixed per 1 % sucrose content.

----
#### DAVIDSON JEWELRY CO. V. BASSETT JEWELRY CO.

(Decided December 16, 1913.)

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

No counsel marked for either party .

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00828

- CR

Saul Matthew CASTILLO

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR10721

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 9, 2014.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
# Official Journal L 254/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 254 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 634 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 254

English edition

Legislation

Volume 634 August 2020

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2020/1077 of amending budget No 3 of the European Union for the financial year 2020 | 1 |
| | * | Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2020/1078 of amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2020 | 19 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

*

Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2020/1077 of amending budget No 3 of the European Union for the financial year 2020

1

*

Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2020/1078 of amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2020

19

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-42 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-42 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-42 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 3 of 3
KCPL CT Generation Summary MWhCompanyStationUnitGenerationEconomicUneconomic% UneconomicKCPLWest GardnerWest Gardner 118,52015,8182,70215%KCPLWest GardnerWest Gardner 219,45116,5632,88815%KCPLWest GardnerWest Gardner 320,93917,9672,97214%KCPLWest GardnerWest Gardner 419,33116,9182,41312%KCPLWest Gardner Total78,24167,26610,97514%KCPLHawthornHawthorn 72,7452,36038514%KCPLHawthornHawthorn 84,3853,41796822%KCPLHawthorn Total7,1305,7771,35319%KCPLNortheastNortheast 1116616600%KCPLNortheastNortheast 1216616600%KCPLNortheastNortheast 1320820800%KCPLNortheastNortheast 14525200%KCPLNortheastNortheast 1521621600%KCPLNortheastNortheast 1625325300%KCPLNortheastNortheast 1742142100%KCPLNortheastNortheast 1818018000%KCPLNortheast Total1,6621,66200%KCPLOsawatomieOsawatomie2,0021,8671357%KCPLOsawatomie Total2,0021,8671357%KCPL Total89,03576,57212,46314%KCPL GMOGreenwoodGreenwood 15,0373,4871,55031%KCPL GMOGreenwoodGreenwood 24,1933,0361,15728%KCPL GMOGreenwoodGreenwood 37,0515,2811,77025%KCPL GMOGreenwoodGreenwood 45,8094,4051,40424%KCPL GMOGreenwood Total22,09016,2095,88127%KCPL GMONevadaNevada11411400%KCPL GMONevada Total11411400%GMORalph GreenRalph Green 264750414322%KCPL GMORalph Green Total64750414322%KCPL GMOSouth HarperSouth Harper 116,47011,4764,99430%KCPL GMOSouth HarperSouth Harper 225,87218,4047,46829%KCPL GMOSouth HarperSouth Harper 318,17313,7884,38524%KCPL GMOSouth Harper Total60,51543,66816,84728%KCPL GMO Total83,36660,49522,87127%GPE Total172,401137,06735,33420%2010
BRUNSWICK-GOLDEN ISLES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 

4 Glynn Avenue, Brunswick, Georgia 31520 

Telephone (912) 265-0620 

FAX: (912)265-0629 

vvvvw.brunsvvickgoldenJsleschamber.com 

September 10,2010 

Aloha Ley _^ ^ , 

Acting Associate Director ^ ^<":r;'-'-'' 

OfFlceof Aviation Analysis ^ ^.rHT:^ 

U. S. Depanment of Transportation "^ ^'^=3^1 

1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E., Room W86-484 - 5§ ^ 

Washington, DC 20590 5i^: ^ 

Subject: Small Community Air Service Development Program r^i'~ 

Statement in Support of Grant Application by the Brunswick Golden IslesriAir Service 

Partnership 

DOCKET: OST-20I0-0124 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

On behalf of the Board of Directors and the membership of the Brunswick-Golden Isles Chamber of 

Commerce \ would like to express our strong support for the application by the Brunswick Golden Isles 

Air Service Partnership (sponsored by the Glynn County Airport Commission) for a new grant under the 

Small Community Air Service Development Program. 

The requested grant will enable the Brunswick community to aggressively implement a cooperative 

Action Plan involving Delta Air Lines, directly benefiting air travelers that use air service at the 

Brunswick-Golden Isles Airport. Our membership will directly benefit from the results of the Action 

Plan, through more affordable air service in our community. 

The Brunswick-Golden Isles Chamber of Commerce has committed financial resources to support the 

application that we feel is necessary to support the action plan described above. Without the total grant 

request, the ability of the community to market and educate the traveling public regarding this action plan 

will be difficult if not impossible to carry out. 

We urge the Department to approve the new grant request, and thereby enable the Partnership to proceed 

with the Action Plan without delay. 

With kindest regards, I am 

Sincerely, 

M. H. "Woody" Woodside 

President • 

Cc: Steven Brian. Glynn County Airport Commission 

1 

BRUNSWICK - lEKYLL ISLAND - LITTLE ST. SIMONS ISLAND - ST. SIMONS ISLAND - SEA ISLAND, GEORGIA
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1071** 

VANESSA SPENCE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

WAL

- MART STORES EAST, LP, d/b/a Wal

- Mart , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. William Connelly , Magistrate Judge. ( 8:13

- cv - 01895

- WGC )

Submitted : April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON , Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Vanessa Spence, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Andrew Kohl, DECARO, DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS, LLP, Bowie, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding preced ent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Vanessa Spence appeals the district court ’ s order granting summary judgment in favor of Wal

- Mart Stores East, LP and closing her civil action

. * On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brie f. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Spence ’ s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Spence has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly , although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, w e affirm the district

court ’ s judgment . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* This case was decided by a magistrate judge with the parties’ consent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
24926 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 83 / Friday, April 28, 2000 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 00–32]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation

Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of a

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of Public

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604–

6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, Transmittal 00–32 with

attached transmittal and policy

justification.

Dated: April 24, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 83 / Friday, April 28, 2000 / Notices 24927

24928 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 83 / Friday, April 28, 2000 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 83 / Friday, April 28, 2000 / Notices 24929

[FR Doc. 00–10575 Filed 4–27–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–C
§ 792.43 What must my written request contain? Your written request for records or testimony must include: ( a ) The caption of the legal proceeding, docket number, and name of the court or other authority involved.
( b ) A copy of the complaint or equivalent document setting forth the assertions in the case and any other pleading or document necessary to show relevance.
( c ) A list of categories of records sought, a detailed description of how the information sought is relevant to the issues in the legal proceeding, and a specific description of the substance of the testimony or records sought.
( d ) A statement as to how the need for the information outweighs the need to maintain the confidentiality of the information and outweighs the burden on the NCUA to produce the records or provide testimony.
( e ) A statement indicating that the information sought is not available from another source, such as a credit union's own books and records, other persons or entities, or the testimony of someone other than an NCUA employee, for example, retained experts.
( f ) A description of all prior decisions, orders, or pending motions in the case that bear upon the relevance of the records or testimony you want.
( g ) The name, address, and telephone number of counsel to each party in the case.
( h ) An estimate of the amount of time you anticipate that you and other parties will need with each NCUA employee for interviews, depositions, or testifying.