alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1032]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Public Law 92-463), announcement is made of the 
following National Advisory body scheduled to meet during the month of 
February 2000.

    Name: National Advisory Council on Migrant Health.
    Date and Time: February 10, 2000; 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; February 
11, 2000; 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: Washington Monarch Hotel, 2401 M Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20037, Phone: (202) 429-2400; Fax: (202) 457-5010.
    The meeting is open to the public.
    Agenda: The agenda includes an overview of general Council 
business activities and priorities. Topics of discussion will 
include the H-2 Guestworker Program, the Migrant research agenda, 
collaboration possibilities with other Migrant health advocates 
organizations, and the Year 2000 recommendations of the National 
Advisory Council. In addition, the Council will be reviewing 
nominations for Council membership for terms beginning in November 
2000.
    Anyone requiring information regarding the subject Council 
should contact Judy Rodgers, Migrant Health Program, staff support 
to the National Advisory Council on Migrant Health, Bureau of 
Primary Health Care, Health Resources and Services Administration, 
4350 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, Telephone (301) 
594-4304.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities indicate.

    Dated: January 10, 2000.
Jane M. Harrison,
Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.
[FR Doc. 00-1032 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q/A (the Report) of Premier Exhibitions, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended August 31, 2011, Samuel S. Weiser, the Interim President and Chief Executive Officer, and Michael J. Little, Senior Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, each certifies that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                                                                          
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        | 
|Dated: December 9, 2011 |  | /s/ Samuel S. Weiser                                                                                     
|                        |  | Samuel S. Weiser                                                                                         
|                        |  | Interim President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                              
|                        | 
|Dated: December 9, 2011 |  | /s/ Michael J. Little                                                                                    
|                        |  | Michael J. Little,                                                                                       
|                        |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Operating Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3436

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the Government 

to pay for the cost of premiums for Servicemembers Group Life Insurance for the first $100,000 of coverage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2003

Mr. ISRAEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 

Government to pay for the cost of premiums for 

Servicemembers Group Life Insurance for the first 

$100,000 of coverage.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Raheen Tyson 

5 Heighter Life Insurance for America’s Troops Act’’. 
2

•HR 3436 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PAYMENT FOR PREMIUMS FOR FIRST $100,000 OF 

2 SERVICEMEMBERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE. 

3 (a) GOVERNMENT PAYMENT.—Section 1969 of title 

4 38, United States Code, is amended—

5 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting ‘‘for any 

6 amount in excess of $100,000’’ after ‘‘under such 

7 policy’’; 

8 (2) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting ‘‘attrib9 utable to any amount of insurance in excess of 

10 $100,000’’ in the second sentence after ‘‘of any indi11 vidual’’; 

12 (3) in subsection (a)(3), by inserting ‘‘for any 

13 amount in excess of $100,000’’ after ‘‘under such 

14 policy’’; and 

15 (4) in subsection (b)—

16 (A) by inserting ‘‘the first $100,000 in in17 surance of coverage plus’’ in the first sentence 

18 after ‘‘traceable to’’; and 

19 (B) by inserting ‘‘with respect to the extra 

20 hazard of duty’’ in the second sentence after 

21 ‘‘such cost’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 subsection (a) shall take effect with respect to premiums 

24 payable for any period beginning after the end of the 90-
3

•HR 3436 IH 

1 day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 

2 Act.

Æ
|                                         |   |                 |   | Name      under       |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------|--------|-----------------------|
|                                         |   | State      or other  |   | which subsidiary |
|                                         |   | jurisdiction of |   | conducts              |
| Name of Subsidiary                           |   | incorporation        |   |  business        |
| Isogen      International, LLC               |   | Delaware             |   | Same                  |
| Innodata      Isogen (Private) Limited       |   | India                |   | Same                  |
| Innodata      XML Content Factory, Inc.      |   | Philippines          |   | Same                  |
| ESS      Manufacturing Company, Inc.         |   | Philippines          |   | Same                  |
| Content      Online Services, Inc.           |   | Philippines          |   | Same                  |
| Innodata      Asia Holdings, Limited         |   | Bermuda              |   | Same                  |
| Innodata      Isogen Lanka (Private) Limited |   | Sri      Lanka       |   | Same                  |

----
#### GROVER *v.*CLARK.

Factor — goods on hand — sold—money had and received.

A factor receiving goods for sale, is not liable for them as goods sold while they remain on hand — if sold the proceeds might be recovered in a count, for money nad and received, deducting his charges; but if the goods have been exchanged for others by the owner’s consent, that is not a sale for which he is so liable, while the goods received remain unsold.

Assumpsit for goods sold, &c. money paid, and had, and received. Plea, non assumpsit.

The plaintiff read a receipt, signed by the defendant, for 254 kegs of tobacco, subject to the plaintiff's order — of which seven kegs were endorsed as returned; and he proved that in an attempt at a settlement, it was agreed that the tobacco was limited by the plaintiff- to ten or twelve and a half cents per lb. The parties differed, and then Clark said the tobacco had been turned into fish, and he would pay when the fish were sold.

*351Defendant introduced a witness who testified — that fifteen kegs of the tobacco had been taken to Maumee with the plaintiff’s consent, to exchange for fish, which were so exchanged, and the plaintiff received the other three kegs back again.

Wright, J.

to the jury. The tobacco was received by the defendant as the plaintiff’s factor, and as such will not be liable until after *demand*and refusal. If the tobacco has been disposed of by plaintiffs order, or exchanged into other articles yet on hand, the defendant is not liable. If he has sold and converted the articles into cash, he may be held liable in this action for the proceeds, deducting his commission and charges.

Verdict and judgment for the defendant.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3666 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 3666

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase from 13 to 15 
  the age of dependents who may be taken into account for purposes of 
 determining the credit for expenses for household and dependent care 
               services necessary for gainful employment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2003

 Mr. Bishop of Georgia (for himself and Mrs. Jones of Ohio) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase from 13 to 15 
  the age of dependents who may be taken into account for purposes of 
 determining the credit for expenses for household and dependent care 
               services necessary for gainful employment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AGE OF DEPENDENTS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT FOR 
              PURPOSES OF CREDIT FOR DEPENDENT CARE EXPENSES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b)(1)(A) and subsection (e)(5)(B) of 
section 21 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to expenses 
for household and dependent care services necessary for gainful 
employment) are each amended by striking ``13'' and inserting ``15''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3647 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3647

               For the relief of Roger Paul Robert Kozik.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2003

Mr. Davis of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Roger Paul Robert Kozik.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ROGER PAUL ROBERT KOZIK.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Roger Paul Robert Kozik 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Roger Paul Robert Kozik enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, 
if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Roger Paul Robert Kozik, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Roger Paul 
Robert Kozik shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 604.400 Definitions. For purposes of this part: ( a ) *Agency* means the Farm Credit Administration.
( b ) *Board* means the Farm Credit Administration Board.
( c ) *Exempt meeting* and *exempt portion of a meeting* mean, respectively, a meeting or that part of a meeting designated as provided in § 604.430 of this part as closed to the public by reason of one or more of the exemptive provisions listed in § 604.420 of this part.
( d ) *Meeting* means the deliberations of at least two (quorum) members of the Board where such deliberations determine or result in joint conduct or disposition of official Farm Credit Administration business.
( e ) *Member* means any one of the members of the Board.
( f ) *Open meeting* means a meeting or portion of a meeting which is not an exempt meeting or an exempt portion of a meeting.
( g ) *Public observation* means the right of any member of the public to attend and observe, but not participate or interfere in any way in, an open meeting of the Board, within the limits of reasonable and comfortable accommodations made available for such purpose by the Farm Credit Administration.
[51 FR 41942, Nov. 20, 1986]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 041900A]


Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Council) Groundfish 
Stock Assessment Review (STAR) Panel will hold a work session which is 
open to the public.

DATES: The STAR Panel for bank rockfish and darkblotched rockfish will 
meet beginning at 1:00 p.m., May 15, 2000 and continue through May 19 
until business is completed. Except for Monday, May 15, 2000, the STAR 
Panel will meet each day from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The STAR Panel for bank rockfish and darkblotched rockfish 
will be held in The Marilyn Potts Guin Library, Hatfield Marine Science 
Center, Oregon State University, 2030 Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR 
97365.
    Council address: Pacific Fishery Management Council, 2130 SW Fifth 
Avenue, Suite 224, Portland, OR 97201.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Waldeck, Fishery Management 
Analyst; telephone: (503) 326-6352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is to review 
draft stock assessment documents for bank rockfish and darkblotched 
rockfish and any other pertinent information, work with stock 
assessment teams to make necessary revisions, and produce STAR Panel 
reports for use by the Council family and other interested persons.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in the STAR Panel 
agenda may come before the panel for discussion, those issues may not 
be the subject of formal panel action during this meeting. Panel action 
will be restricted to those issues specifically listed in this notice, 
and any issues arising after publication of this notice that require 
emergency action under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act, provided the public has been notified 
of the panel's intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Mr. John Rhoton at (503) 326-6352 at least 5 days 
prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: April 19, 2000.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 00-10301 Filed 4-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
#### SEWALL v. THE STATE.

Certainty in indictment — defacing or altering ear marks»

An indictment must describe the offence with such certainty as to apprise the defendant what 'he is to answer, that he may shape his defence and plead the judgment in bar.

An indictment for defacing an ear mark does not attain to such certainty which does not set out the mark alleged to be altered or defaced, or describe the alteration or how defaced.

Error. The plaintiff in error was indicted and convicted in the Common Pleas, for that he, ‘ the artificial ear marks upon two sheep, the personal property of one F. D. Payne then and there being wilfully and maliciously, did alter and deface, contrary to the statutes,’ &c.

Sí. *M.*Tracy, for the plaintiff in error,

contended, that by the act for the punishment of certain offences, (29 O. *L.*148) two offences were created; one, the altering or changing an ear mark, from that of one person to that of another; the other, the defacing the mark, so as to leave the animal without any known mark. This indictment unites the two offences in one count,and is vicious; 29 *O. L.*148; *Bac. Ab. índ. G.*

2. The charge is too general, as it does not aver how the mark was altered or defaced, or the mark which was altered or defaced, nor aver that the mark altered was that of the prosecutor, or of any other person.

Clough, for the state,

thought the indictment sufficiently, certain. It was one and the same offence to *alter*and to *deface*an ear mark. There was no law giving to any individual a property in a mark, or requiring it to he recorded; but every one may mark his property as he pleases. Every altering is a defacing, and every defacing is an alteration.

By the Court,

stopping Murphy in reply. This indictment attains to no certainty, not even to a-common intent. It is necessary *484that the state attain to such certainty as to notify the defendant what he is to answer, in order that he may shape his defence to meet it, and be enabled to plead in bar of any future prosecution, an acquittal or conviction under it. This indictment does not do so; it should set forth the existing mark, and describe its‘alteration, or the manner as near as may be, it is alleged to be defaced.

The judgment is revei-sed.
#### CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RY. CO. V. CARROLL.

(Decided January 22, 1914.)

Appeal from Houston Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

B. F. Reid, for appellant. Pace & Lee, for appellee

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed .
#### § 791.16 General counsel certification.

For each meeting or any portion of a meeting closed to public observation under § 791.14, the General Counsel shall publicly certify, whether in his or her opinion, the meeting or portion thereof may be closed to public observation and shall state each relevant exemption provision of law. A copy of the certification, together with a statement from the presiding officer of the meeting setting forth the time and place of the meeting and the persons present, shall be retained as a part of the permanent meeting records. As part of the certification, the General Counsel shall recommend to the Board whether the public interest requires that the meeting or portions thereof proposed to be closed to public observation be held in the open.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LEE FRANK ADAMS, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D23-10

[April 13, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; William L. Roby, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 561991CF000672A.

Lee Frank Adams, Jr., Chipley, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER, and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-70050, 33-80985, 333-32237 and
333-57754 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-81792 and 333-117883 on Form S-3 of our reports dated
March 28, 2008, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Aldila, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
paragraphs relating to the Company's adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesin 2007, and restatement
of the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and consolidated cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005), and the effectiveness of
Aldila, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aldila, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.

San
Diego, California
March 28, 2008

---



QuickLinks