alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**I, Steven A. Odom, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Verso Technologies, Inc.(the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2005(the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and  2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: August 8, 2005     /s/Steven A. Odom     Steven A. Odom,  Chairman of the Board and
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LPA Holding Corp. and La Petite Academy,
Inc. (the "Companies") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gary A. Graves, Chief Executive Officer and I, Neil P. Dyment,
Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
            78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Companies.

/s/ Gary A. Graves                                   /s/ Neil P. Dyment

Gary A. Graves                                       Neil P. Dyment
Chief Executive Officer                              Chief Financial Officer
September 24, 2004                                   September 24, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Companies and will be retained by the Companies and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3538

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 201 South Chicago Avenue in Saint Anne, 

Illinois, as the ‘‘Marine Capt. Ryan Beaupre Saint Anne 

Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3538 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 201 South Chicago Avenue in Saint Anne, Illi4 nois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Marine Capt. 

5 Ryan Beaupre Saint Anne Post Office’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Marine Capt. Ryan Beaupre Saint Anne Post Of11 fice’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 9, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3642

To require the Secretary of State to prepare an annual report on progress 

made to eradicate poppy cultivation and prevent illicit drug trafficking 

in Afghanistan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2003

Ms. WATERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

A BILL

To require the Secretary of State to prepare an annual 

report on progress made to eradicate poppy cultivation 

and prevent illicit drug trafficking in Afghanistan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ANNUAL REPORT ON ERADICATION OF POPPY 

4 CULTIVATION AND ILLICIT DRUG TRAF5 FICKING IN AFGHANISTAN. 

6 (a) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after 

7 the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually there8 after, the Secretary of State shall prepare and submit to 

9 the appropriate congressional committees a report that 
2

•HR 3642 IH 

1 contains a detailed description on progress made during 

2 the prior year to eradicate poppy cultivation and prevent 

3 illicit drug trafficking in Afghanistan. 

4 (b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘appro5 priate congressional committees’’ means—

6 (1) the Committee on International Relations 

7 and the Committee on Appropriations of the House 

8 of Representatives; and 

9 (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations and 

10 the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate.

Æ
§ 107.51 Operating limitations for small unmanned aircraft. A remote pilot in command and the person manipulating the flight controls of the small unmanned aircraft system must comply with all of the following operating limitations when operating a small unmanned aircraft system: ( a ) The groundspeed of the small unmanned aircraft may not exceed 87 knots (100 miles per hour).
( b ) The altitude of the small unmanned aircraft cannot be higher than 400 feet above ground level, unless the small unmanned aircraft: ( 1 ) Is flown within a 400-foot radius of a structure; and
( 2 ) Does not fly higher than 400 feet above the structure's immediate uppermost limit.
( c ) The minimum flight visibility, as observed from the location of the control station must be no less than 3 statute miles. For purposes of this section, flight visibility means the average slant distance from the control station at which prominent unlighted objects may be seen and identified by day and prominent lighted objects may be seen and identified by night.
( d ) The minimum distance of the small unmanned aircraft from clouds must be no less than: ( 1 ) 500 feet below the cloud; and
( 2 ) 2,000 feet horizontally from the cloud.
# Official Journal C 247A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 247A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6223 July 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 247A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6223 July 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Council |
| 2019/C 247 A/01 | Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/147/19 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Council

2019/C 247 A/01

Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/147/19

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 1214.1102 Evaluation of applications. ( a ) All incoming applications will be reviewed to determine whether or not applicants meet basic qualifications. Those not meeting the basic qualification requirements will be so notified and will not be eligible for further consideration. Those meeting the basic qualification requirements will have their applications retained for review by a designated rating panel.
( b ) A rating panel composed of discipline experts will review and rate qualified applicants as “Qualified” or “Highly Qualified.”
( c ) Efforts will be made to ensure that minorities and females are included among these discipline experts on the rating panel.
( d ) The criteria for each level will be developed and will serve as the basis for the ratings. The evaluation will be based on the quality of the individual's academic background and experience and the extent to which the individual's academic achievements, experience, and special qualifications relate to the astronaut candidate position. Reference information on those rated “Highly Qualified” will normally be obtained. This evaluation process will be monitored to ensure adherence to applicable policy, laws, and regulations.
( e ) Those rated “Highly Qualified” may be required to obtain a Class I or Class II physical. Only medically qualified applicants will be referred for final evaluation and possible interview and selection. Those who are not medically qualified will be so informed and will not be eligible for further consideration.
[54 FR 37940, Sept. 14, 1989, as amended at 68 FR 19948, Apr. 23, 2003]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM ZEON CORPORATION'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000796513
<NAME> ZEON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                         111,692
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  288,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,676)
<INVENTORY>                                    217,206
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               648,517
<PP&E>                                         398,824
<DEPRECIATION>                               (325,679)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 761,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          221,179
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,920
<OTHER-SE>                                     495,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   761,433
<SALES>                                        572,565
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               572,565
<CGS>                                          369,635
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  369,635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               204,492
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,976
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,976
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,976
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .014
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .014
        

</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00096

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

V.

ANTHONY CHRISTOPHER

MERITO APPELLEE

----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF WICHITA COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 61,9 52

- F

------------



### MEMORAN DUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “ State’s Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal. ” The

motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered be fore we

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47 .4.2

received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 9 , 2015
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-00592- CV

Sam ’s Mot ors, LLC, and Sam er Y acoub, App ellants
v. Shak il Chou dhu ry, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 201 ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 1-0 0020 7, H ONO RAB LE STEP HEN Y ELENOSK Y , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellants filed their notice of appea l on Aug ust 28, 2013, and appellants’ brief was due on Dec ember 13, 2013. On J anuar y 10, 2014, this Court notified appellants that their brief was overdue and that the appea l could be dismiss ed for want of prosec ution unless appellants filed a response rea sonably explaining their failure to file a brief
. To date, appellants have not filed a brief
or otherwise responde d to our notice Acc ording ly , we dismiss this appea l for want of prosec ution. SeeTex. R. App. P . 38.8(a) ; 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Just ice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin and F ield Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: F ebrua

ry 21, 2014
§ 1204.509 Delegation of authority to take action regarding “liquidated damage” assessments under the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, and associated labor statutes. ( a ) *Delegation of authority.* The Assistant Administrator, Office of Strategic Infrastructure, is hereby delegated the authority to act for the Administrator in all matters where the “Agency Head” is authorized to act under 29 CFR part 5, labor standards provisions applicable to contracts covering federally financed and assisted construction and labor standards provisions applicable to nonconstruction contracts as they are subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, in regards to the assessment of liquidated damages.
( b ) *Redelegation.* None authorized except by virtue of succession.
( c ) *Reporting.* The official to whom authority is delegated in this regulation will assure that feedback is provided to keep the Administrator informed of significant actions, problems, or other matters of substance related to the exercise of the authority delegated hereunder.
[52 FR 35538, Sept. 22, 1987, as amended at 79 FR 11320, Feb. 28, 2014]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Corvis Corporation:

      We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-47104) on Form S-8 of Corvis Corporation of our reports dated January
23, 2001, except as to note 13(b) which is as of March 5, 2001, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Corvis Corporation as of January 1, 2000 and
December 30, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
1998, January 1, 2000 and December 30, 2000, and the related schedule, which
reports appear in the December 30, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of Corvis
Corporation.


                                        /s/ KPMG LLP


McLean, Virginia
March 28, 2001
Exhibit 32.2

 

SECURED INVESTMENT RESOURCES FUND, L.P. II

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Investment Resources Fund, L.P. II (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Wilkinson, Vice President and Principal Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of September 30, 2007 (the last date of the period covered by the Report).

 

SECURED INVESTMENT RESOURCES FUND, L.P. II

 

By: Millenium Management, LLC

General Partner

 

By: /s/ Peter Wilkinson

Peter Wilkinson

Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 6, 2007
§ 303.242 Exercise of trust powers. ( a ) *Scope.* This section contains the procedures to be followed by a State nonmember bank or State savings association that seeks to obtain the FDIC's prior written consent to exercise trust powers. The FDIC's prior written consent to exercise trust powers is not required in the following circumstances: ( 1 ) Where a State nonmember bank or State savings association received authority to exercise trust powers from its chartering authority prior to December 1, 1950; or
( 2 ) Where the institution continues to conduct trust activities pursuant to authority granted by its chartering authority subsequent to a charter conversion or withdrawal from membership in the Federal Reserve System.
( b ) *Where to file.* Applicants shall submit to the appropriate FDIC office a completed form, “Application for Consent to Exercise Trust Powers.” This form may be obtained from any FDIC regional director.
( c ) *Content of filing.* The filing shall consist of the completed trust application form.
( d ) *Additional information.* The FDIC may request additional information at any time during processing of the filing.
( e ) *Expedited processing for eligible depository institutions.* An application filed under this section by an eligible depository institution as defined in § 303.2(r) will be acknowledged in writing by the FDIC and will receive expedited processing, unless the applicant is notified in writing to the contrary and provided with the basis for that decision. The FDIC may remove an application from expedited processing for any of the reasons set forth in § 303.11(c)(2.). Absent such removal, an application processed under expedited procedures will be deemed approved 30 days after the FDIC's receipt of a substantially complete application.
( f ) *Standard processing.* For those applications that are not processed pursuant to the expedited procedures, the FDIC will provide the applicant with written notification of the final action when the decision is rendered.
[83 FR 60337, Nov. 26, 2018]
#### Reeves *v.*Burnham.

Where more than a year and a day has elapsed after rendition of a judgment, and no steps have been taken to enforce it, the judgment must be revived by *scire facias;*and an execution issued after the lapse of that period, without a revival of the judgment by *scire facias,*is irregular, and will be quashed on motion.

Judgments on forfeited forthcoming bonds are regarded in the same light as judgments obtained in the ordinary mode of proceeding.

ERROR from the circuit court of Warren county.

Guión and Prentiss, for plaintiff in error.

Harrison, *contra.*

Mr. Justice Trotter

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to the circuit court of Warren county. The record shows that at the November term of the circuit court of that county, and on the 4th day of November, 1830, the plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant for the sum of 272 dollars, and 16 cents. That, afterwards, on the 19th day of February, 1835, an execution was sued out on this judgment *26returnable to the May term following. At the return term of the execution a motion was made by the defendants to quash it, which was sustained by the court.

The judgment of the court on this motion is the error assigned. The period of a year and a day had elapsed after the rendition of the judgment, before any step was taken by the plaintiff to enforce it. The *fieri facias*was the first and only process issued. More than four years had expired, and the judgment was presumed to be satisfied. The plaintiff was therefore bound to revive it in the ordinary way by a *scire facias.*The execution was irregular, and the court below did right in setting it aside.

It is no answer to this conclusion that the judgment was rendered upon the forfeiture of a forthcoming bond taken in satisfaction of a prior judgment; the court could not look behind the judgment on the bond. It was a satisfaction of the original judgment and is to be regarded in the same light as judgments obtained in the ordinary mode of proceedings in courts of justice.

The judgment of the circuit court must, therefore, be affirmed and cause dismissed.
# Official Journal C 116I/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 116I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6631 March 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 116I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6631 March 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 116 I/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 30 March 2023 to 30 March 2023
  (Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 116 I/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 30 March 2023 to 30 March 2023
  (Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council

or Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 4.1



                                  FORM OF STOCK CERTIFICATE


          Alloy Steel  International,  Inc.'s  stock  certificate  is printed on
white  paper with green  design.  It  contains  an emblem of an eagle  above the
Company's name. Immediately beneath the Company's name is printed the authorized
capital stock of the Company,  which is 50,000,000  shares of common stock,  par
value $0.01, and 3,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01.

          The body of the stock certificate contains the following:

               This  certifies  that  ____________  is  the  owner  of
               ______________ fully paid and non-assessable  Shares of
               Capital   Stock   of  the   above   named   Corporation
               transferable  only on the books of the  Corporation  by
               the  holder  hereof  in  person  or by duly  authorized
               Attorney upon  surrender of this  Certificate  properly
               endorsed.