alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4.33 Requirements for a request of records or testimony. ( a ) *Generally* — ( 1 ) *Form of request.* A person seeking non-public OCC information must submit a request in writing to the OCC. The requester must explain, in as detailed a description as is necessary under the circumstances, the bases for the request and how the requested non-public OCC information relates to the issues in the lawsuit or matter.
( 2 ) *Expedited request.* A requester seeking a response in less than 60 days must explain why the request was not submitted earlier and why the OCC should expedite the request.
( 3 ) *Request arising from adversarial matters.* Where the requested information is to be used in connection with an adversarial matter: ( i ) The OCC generally will require that the lawsuit or administrative action has been filed before it will consider the request;
( ii ) The request must include: ( A ) A copy of the complaint or other pleading setting forth the assertions in the case;
( B ) The caption and docket number of the case;
( C ) The name, address, and phone number of counsel to each party in the case; and
( D ) A description of any prior judicial decisions or pending motions in the case that may bear on the asserted relevance of the requested information;
( iii ) The request must also: ( A ) Show that the information is relevant to the purpose for which it is sought;
( B ) Show that other evidence reasonably suited to the requester's needs is not available from any other source;
( C ) Show that the need for the information outweighs the public interest considerations in maintaining the confidentiality of the OCC information and outweighs the burden on the OCC to produce the information;
( D ) Explain how the issues in the case and the status of the case warrant that the OCC allow disclosure; and
( E ) Identify any other issue that may bear on the question of waiver of privilege by the OCC.
( b ) *Request for records.* If the request is for a record, the requester must adequately describe the record or records sought by type and date.
( c ) *Request for testimony* — ( 1 ) *Generally.* A requester seeking testimony: ( i ) Must show a compelling need for the requested information; and
( ii ) Should request OCC testimony with sufficient time to obtain the testimony in deposition form.
( 2 ) *Trial or hearing testimony.* A requester seeking testimony at a trial or hearing must show that a deposition would not suffice.
§ 105.47 Use of static lines. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may conduct a parachute operation using a static line attached to the aircraft and the main parachute unless an assist device, described and attached as follows, is used to aid the pilot chute in performing its function, or, if no pilot chute is used, to aid in the direct deployment of the main parachute canopy. The assist device must— ( 1 ) Be long enough to allow the main parachute container to open before a load is placed on the device.
( 2 ) Have a static load strength of— ( i ) At least 28 pounds but not more than 160 pounds if it is used to aid the pilot chute in performing its function; or
( ii ) At least 56 pounds but not more than 320 pounds if it is used to aid in the direct deployment of the main parachute canopy; and
( 3 ) Be attached as follows: ( i ) At one end, to the static line above the static-line pins or, if static-line pins are not used, above the static-line ties to the parachute cone.
( ii ) At the other end, to the pilot chute apex, bridle cord, or bridle loop, or, if no pilot chute is used, to the main parachute canopy.
( b ) No person may attach an assist device required by paragraph (a) of this section to any main parachute unless that person is a certificated parachute rigger or that person makes the next parachute jump with that parachute.
( c ) An assist device is not required for parachute operations using direct-deployed, ram-air parachutes.
This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is

made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the 

accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for individual

or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended

by BLM. This map may not meet National Map Accuracy 

Standards. This product was developed through digital

means and information may be updated without notification.

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5

Miles

Allen Road

Frey

Opp Road

T

4

N

36 31 36

Heag Road

1 6 1

South Fork Crooked

Creek

T

3

N

Oswald Road

Birkley Road

Sidell Road

Buffalo Springs Ranch Roads

Peterson Road

Buffalo Springs Ranch Roads

R25E

Route information and proposed management actions in this 

document only apply to Bureau of Land Management lands.

No route designations will be made on non-federal or private lands.

 The information on this map is developed from a variety of

 data sources and input scales may cause some misalignment of 

data layers. This map is for planning purposes only, and not 

intended for on-ground travel. 1:24,000

Wyoming

R24E

Location Map

Montana

Billings 

Field 

Office

±

Legend

Recommended Routes

Open with Additional Management: 8.6 Miles

Roads

Streams

Lakes

Bureau of Land Management

Public Lands Survey System

Division of State Lands

Private 

Acton Travel Management Area

Acton Travel Management Area 

Alternative C

Map 117

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF OFFICERS**

**OF      THE FASHION HOUSE HOLDINGS, INC.**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 USC Section 1350**

|                                    |      |                                                                                                           |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:                May 15, 2007 | By:  | /s/                John                Hanna            |
|                                    |      | John                Hanna                                                                                      |
|                                    |      | Chief                Executive Officer                                                                         |

|                                    |      |                                                                                                                           |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:                May 15, 2007 | By:  | /s/                Michael                McHugh              |
|                                    |      | Michael                McHugh                                                                                                  |
|                                    |      | Chief                Financial Officer and Principal Accounting                Officer                                         |
# EXHIBIT 10.4

# SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE

This Second Amendment to Lease, dated as of January 23, 2003 (Second
Amendment), between Ryan Rogers, LLC (Landlord) and D56, Inc. (Tenant).

WITNESSETH,that:

WHEREAS,Ryan Companies US,
Inc. (Ryan), the predecessor in interest to Landlord, and Tenant have entered into a Lease dated April 14, 1999 (Lease), whereby
Landlord has leased to Tenant certain Premises located at Wilfred Lane North and Commerce Boulevard in the City of Rogers, County
of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, consisting of the Premises, as such Premises are defined in the Lease; and

WHEREAS,Ryan and Tenant have
entered into Lease Amendment One dated April 28, 2000, amending the Lease; and

NOW, THEREFORE,Landlord and
Tenant desire and intend hereby to further amend the Lease as specifically hereinafter set forth and provided:

|1. |  | In Section 5, on the bottom of page 13, in the subsection that
begins with:
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | The following shall be excluded from Operating Costs:
| | -------------------------------------------------------

| | Item A. shall be eliminated in its entirety and replaced with the
following:
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | A. Landlords costs and obligations under Section 7.A.
| | --------------------------------------------------------

EXCEPT as expressly
amended or supplemented herein, the Lease shall remain as amended by Lease Amendment One, and continue in full force and effect in
all respects.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,this
Second Amendment is hereby executed and delivered effective as of the date and year first above written.

|LANDLORD: |      | Ryan Rogers, LLC         | 
|--------- | ---- | ------------------------ | 
|         
|          | BY:  | /s/   [NAME ILLEGIBLE]   | 
|          |     
|          |      | Its Manager              | 
|         
|         
|TENANT    |      | D56, Inc.                | 
|         
|          | BY:  | /s/   Timothy J. Schugel | 
|          |     
|          | Its: | EVP & CFO                | 
|          |     

---

# Consent by Guarantor

The undersigned, being the guarantor
of the obligations of the Tenant under the Lease described above, does hereby consent to
the foregoing Second Amendment to Lease.

| |                     |           |                          |  | 
| | ------------------- | --------- | ------------------------ |  | 
| | Department 56, Inc.
|
| | By:                 |           | /s/   Timothy J. Schugel
| |                    
| | Its:                | EVP & CFO
| |                    

---
221123 EXHIBIT A. APPEARANCE SHEET VERSION NOVEMBER 23, 2022 1

EXHIBIT A1

PARTY APPEARANCE SHEET

Name of Party 

ATTORNEY 1 Appearance Method In Person PR/NY or CourtSolutions Speaking Line2

Name

Law Firm

Email

Phone Number

Docket Entry No. of

Notice of Appearance

ATTORNEY 2 Appearance Method In Person PR/NY or CourtSolutions Speaking Line

Name

Law Firm

Email

Phone Number

Docket Entry No. of

Notice of Appearance

ADDITIONAL 

ATTORNEY 

OBSERVATION

Complete the below 

information for each 

attorney appearing for 

observation purposes. 

Name

• In Person – PR

• In Person – NY

• CourtSolutions 

Listen Only

Law Firm

Email 

Phone Number 

Attorneys who wish to view but not participate in the hearing may gain admittance to the San Juan 

Courtroom or New York Courtroom, on a first-come first-served basis. All attorneys who wish to 

observe in person must be listed on this appearance sheet. 

 

 1 This Party Appearance Sheet must be attached to a party-in-interest’s Informative Motion as 

Exhibit A. 2 Pursuant to the Hearing Procedures Order ¶ 2, attorneys intending to appear by CourtSolutions 

must also separately register on the CourtSolutions website. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22907-1 Filed:11/23/22 Entered:11/23/22 13:04:03 Desc:

Exhibit A - Appearance Sheet Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-122403) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan and the 2004 EquityIncentive Plan of Adeza Biomedical Corporation of our reports dated March 12, 2007, with respect tothe financial statements of Adeza Biomedical Corporation, Adeza Biomedical Corporation management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of Adeza Biomedical Corporation included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPPalo Alto, California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO, 

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al.,

Debtors.

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO, 

as representative of

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER

CORPORATION (“PREPA”),

Debtor.

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 4780-LTS

Relates to Debtor PREPA Only

NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF DUSTIN MONDELL

TO: Dustin Mondell

Through counsel of record for the Puerto Rico Fiscal Agency and Financial 

Advisory Authority

O’Melveny & Myers LLP

7 Times Square

New York, NY 10036

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, made applicable to this matter by Rules 9014 and 7026 of the Federal Rules of 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2300 Filed:01/29/18 Entered:01/29/18 14:10:11 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Bankruptcy Procedure, Ambac Assurance Corporation (“Ambac”), by its counsel, will take the 

deposition upon oral examination of Dustin Mondell, commencing at 11 a.m. ET on January 31, 

2018, at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, 28 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10005, or at 

such other time and place as may be agreed to among counsel for the parties. 

The deposition will be recorded stenographically, by videotape (sound and visual), and 

through instant visual display via “real time” software, which provides instantaneous electronic 

transcripts on a laptop computer. The deposing party reserves the right to use the videotape 

recording at any proceeding in lieu of live testimony from the deponent in accordance with 

applicable law. The deposition will take place before an officer authorized to administer oaths. 

Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, the deposition shall proceed in accordance with the 

applicable rules. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2300 Filed:01/29/18 Entered:01/29/18 14:10:11 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Dated: San Juan, Puerto Rico

 January 29, 2018

FERRAIUOLI LLC

By: /s/ Roberto Cámara Fuertes 

Roberto Cámara-Fuertes (USDC-PR No. 219002)

Sonia Colón (USDC-PR No. 213809)

221 Ponce de León Avenue, 5th Floor

San Juan, PR 00917

Telephone: (787) 766-7000

Facsimile: (787) 766-7001

Email: rcamara@ferraiuoli.com

 scolon@ferraiuoli.com 

MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY LLP

By: /s/ Atara Miller 

Dennis F. Dunne (admitted pro hac vice)

Andrew M. Leblanc (admitted pro hac vice)

Atara Miller (admitted pro hac vice)

Grant R. Mainland (admitted pro hac vice)

28 Liberty Street 

New York, NY 10005

Telephone: (212) 530-5770

Facsimile: (212) 822-5770

Email: ddunne@milbank.com

 aleblanc@milbank.com

 amiller@milbank.com

 gmainland@milbank.com

Attorneys for Ambac Assurance Corporation

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2300 Filed:01/29/18 Entered:01/29/18 14:10:11 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Group Wage Creditors in the Litigation Captioned 

Abraham Gimenez et al. v. Puerto Rico Department 

of Transportation & Public Works, CASE No. 2021-

05-0346

Claimants – Appellants

v.

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE 

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE 

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEE’S 

RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE 

GOVERNMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH 

OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL 

OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD 

FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE 

FOR THE PUERTO RICO HIGHWAYS AND 

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Appellees

 

 PROMESA

 Title III

 

 Case No. 17-bk-03283

 

 

NOTICE OF APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Notice is hereby given that the Group Wage Creditors in the Litigation Captioned Abraham 

Gimenez et al. v. Puerto Rico Department of Transportation & Public Works, CASE No. 2021-

05-0346, hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit the “Order

Denying Motion Requesting Allowance and Payment of Administrative Expense Claims Filed 

by Wage Claimants” (See, Exhibit A) entered in the above-captioned case on November 3, 2022 

at Docket No. 22799 denying the Application for Allowance of Administrative Expense Priority 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23156 Filed:12/22/22 Entered:12/22/22 17:09:20 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

Payment Pursuant to Section 503(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Bankruptcy Code Filed by Group Wage 

Creditors in the Litigation Caption Abraham Gimenez (1,046 Plaintiffs) v. the Department of 

Transportation and Public Works and Reservation of Rights (Docket Entry No. 21227 in Case No. 

17-3283)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this date I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using 

the CM/ECF system which electronically mails notice to the attorneys of record. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico this 22nd of December 2022.

THE BATISTA LAW GROUP, PSC. 

S/ Jesus E. Batista Sánchez

Jesus E. Batista Sánchez, Esq.

Attorney for the Appellants

USDC-PR No. 227014

P.O. Box 191059

San Juan, PR. 00919

Telephone: (787) 620-2856

Facsimile: (787) 777-1589

E-mail: jeb@batistasanchez.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23156 Filed:12/22/22 Entered:12/22/22 17:09:20 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** December 5, 2018 No. 04 - 18 - 00748 - CR Ashley Nicole Olivia LOPEZ , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell ee Fro m the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CR2149 Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding 

### ORDER On October 15, 2018, appellant Ashley Nicole Olivia Lopez filed a notice of appeal from a trial court’s order placing her on deferred adjudication community supervision. The notice of appeal was filed under trial court cause number 2018CR2149 , and this court assigned the appeal two appellate number s: 04 - 18 - 00748 - CR and 04 - 18 - 00754 - CR . Thus, there are two appeals currently pending from the same order . At this time, onl y the following documents have been filed in appellate number 04 - 18 - 00748 - CR: (1) the pro se notice of appeal; (2) a pro se motion for appointment of counsel on appeal; (3) the trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal; and (4) the certifi cate of notice of appeal. T he clerk’s record as well as a supplemental clerk’s record, which includes the above documents, have been filed in appellate number 04 - 18 - 00754 - CR . Accordingly, after review, we ORDER the clerk of this court to administrative ly close appellate number 04 - 18 - 00748 - CR . We ORDER the clerk of this court to transfer all filings in appellate number 04 - 18 - 00748 - CR to appellate number 04 - 18 - 00754 - CR . All future filings in this matter should be filed under 04 - 18 - 00754 - CR . We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel, the district clerk, and the court reporter, if any.

________ _________________________ Marialyn Barnard, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of December, 2018 .

____ _______________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE , Clerk of Court
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

May 23, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 07-15058

 

D. C. Docket No. 04-00321 CV-CG-B

ARGO SYSTEMS FZE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LIBERTY INSURANCE PTE. LTD,

MARINE INSURANCE SERVICES PTE. LTD,

DEWITT STERN GROUP, INC.,

DEWITT STERN, IMPERATORE, LTD.,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

 

(May 23, 2008)
2

Before DUBINA and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER,* District

Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Argo Systems FZE (“Argo”) appeals the district court’s order

granting Appellees Liberty Insurance Pte. Ltd. (“Liberty”) and Marine Insurance

Services PTE. Ltd.’s (“MIS”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction

and the district court’s judgment entered in favor of Appellee DeWitt Stern,

Imperatore, Ltd. (“DeWitt” or “DSI”) on Argo’s professional negligence and

negligent misrepresentation claims. 

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the

benefit of oral argument, we conclude that there is no merit to any of the

arguments Argo makes in this appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order granting Liberty and MIS’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal

jurisdiction. Moreover, we affirm the district court’s judgment entered in favor of

DeWitt after a bench trial on Argo’s professional negligence and negligent

misrepresentation claims. 

AFFIRMED.

__________________________

*Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Court for the Middle District of

Florida, sitting by designation.
§ 650.13 Grounds for appointment of a receiver or conservator. ( a ) The grounds for the appointment of a receiver or conservator for the Corporation are: ( 1 ) The Corporation is insolvent. For purposes of this paragraph, insolvent means: ( i ) The assets of the Corporation are less than its obligations to its creditors and others; or
( ii ) The Corporation is unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business;
( 2 ) There has been a substantial dissipation of the assets or earnings of the Corporation due to the violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or the conduct of an unsafe or unsound practice;
( 3 ) The Corporation is in an unsafe or unsound condition to transact business;
( 4 ) The Corporation has committed a willful violation of a final cease-and-desist order issued by the Farm Credit Administration Board;
( 5 ) The Corporation is concealing its books, papers, records, or assets, or is refusing to submit its books, papers, records, assets, or other material relating to the affairs of the Corporation for inspection to any examiner or any lawful agent of the Farm Credit Administration Board.
( b ) In addition to the grounds set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, a receiver can be appointed for the Corporation if the Farm Credit Administration Board determines that the appointment of a conservator would not be appropriate when one of the following conditions exists: ( 1 ) The authority of the Corporation to purchase qualified loans or issue or guarantee loan-backed securities is suspended; or
( 2 ) The Corporation is classified under section 8.35 of the Act as within enforcement level III or IV and the alternative actions available under subtitle B of title VIII of the Act are not satisfactory.
( c ) In addition to the grounds set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, a conservator can be appointed for the Corporation if: ( 1 ) The Corporation is classified under section 8.35 of the Act as within enforcement level III or IV; or
( 2 ) The authority of the Corporation to purchase qualified loans or issue or guarantee loan-backed securities is suspended.
[62 FR 43636, Aug. 15, 1997. Redesignated at 70 FR 40650, July 14, 2005. Further redesignated at 81 FR 49151, July 27, 2016]
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3537

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 185 State Street in Manhattan, Illinois, as the ‘‘Army Pvt. Shawn Pahnke

Manhattan Post Office’’.

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3537

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 185 State Street in Manhattan, Illinois, as

the ‘‘Army Pvt. Shawn Pahnke Manhattan Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3537 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 185 State Street in Manhattan, Illinois, shall be

4 known and designated as the ‘‘Army Pvt. Shawn Pahnke

5 Manhattan Post Office’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Army Pvt. Shawn Pahnke Manhattan Post Of11 fice’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 9,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.