alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM  
DECEMBER 31, 1996 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH PROSPECTUS FILED ON FORM S-1 DATED JUNE 5, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      15,209,180
<SECURITIES>                                10,839,876
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,988,643
<PP&E>                                       2,896,846
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,015,483
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,437,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,422,324
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,845
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,942,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,437,531
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,847,531
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,429,467
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,581,936)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,581,936)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,581,936)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. 

*Docket Number:*                     00-004.                     *Applicant:*                     Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931.                     *Instrument:*                     Automatic Thin Section Machine.                     *Manufacturer:*                     Dansk Beton Teknik A/S, Denmark. Intended Use: See notice at 65 FR 11986, March 7, 2000.                 

*Comments:*                     None received.                     *Decision:*                     Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the United States.                     *Reasons:*                     The foreign instrument provides a horizontally mounted rotating diamond impregnated drum under which specimens are repeatedly passed on a sliding platform to minimize damage to cement and asphalt concrete thin sections for microscopic examination. The Federal Highway Administration advises that (1) this capability is pertinent to the applicant's intended purpose and (2) it knows of no domestic instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument for the applicant's intended use.                 

We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured in the United States. 

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff. 

[FR Doc. 00-10416 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
PIONEER RAILCORP

                    BALLOT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
                                  JUNE 26, 2001


ELECTION OF DIRECTORS:

Guy L. Brenkman        For____       Withhold____
J. Michael Carr        For____       Withhold____
Orvel L. Cox           For____       Withhold____
John S. Fulton         For____       Withhold____
Timothy F. Shea        For____       Withhold____

______________         For____

______________         For____



PROPOSAL 1 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Public Accountants

         FOR the appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as the Company's 2001
-------  independent public accountants

         AGAINST the appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as the Company's
-------  2001 independent public accountants



Dated:                                  , 2001
      ----------------------------------



Signature

Signature if Held Jointly

Number of Shares Held
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

p0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

138544

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138544 COA: 289236 Wayne CC: 00-005802-01 DARNELL PARHAM, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 18, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3428

AN ACT

To designate a portion of the United States courtUnited States Attorney’s Building’’. andria, Virginia, as the ‘‘Justin W. Williams house located at 2100 Jamieson Avenue, in Alex-

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3428

AN ACT

To designate a portion of the United States courthouse located at 2100 Jamieson Avenue, in Alexandria, Virginia,

as the ‘‘Justin W. Williams United States Attorney’s

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3428 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The building and structure de3 scribed in subsection (b) shall be known and designated

4 as the ‘‘Justin W. Williams United States Attorney’s

5 Building’’.

6 (b) DESCRIPTION.—The building and structure to be

7 designated under subsection (a) is that portion of the

8 United States courthouse located at 2100 Jamieson Ave9 nue, in Alexandria, Virginia (known as the Albert V.

10 Bryan United States Courthouse), that is attached to the

11 courthouse main tower structure, described as A-Wing in

12 the architectural plans, and currently occupied by the Of13 fice of the United States Attorney for the Eastern District

14 of Virginia, Alexandria Division.

15 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

16 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

17 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

18 and structure described in section 1(b) shall be deemed

19 to be a reference to the ‘‘Justin W. Williams United States

20 Attorney’s Building’’.

21 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

22 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums

23 as may be necessary for appropriate identifying designa24 tions to be affixed to the building and structure described

25 in section 1(b) and for an appropriate plaque reflecting

26 the designation and honoring Justin W. Williams and his
3

•HR 3428 EH

1 service to the Nation to be affixed to or displayed in such

2 building and structure.

Passed the House of Representatives September 22,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
# Official Journal C 269/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.269.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 269 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 535 October 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.269.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 269

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 535 October 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 269/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 269/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 269/02 | Euro exchange rates | 5 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 269/02

Euro exchange rates

5

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 269/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6005 — Cinven/Spice) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 6 |
| 2010/C 269/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5936 — EADS DS/Atlas/JV) (1) | 7 |
| 2010/C 269/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5880 — Shell/Topaz/JV) (1) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2010/C 269/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6005 — Cinven/Spice) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

6

2010/C 269/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5936 — EADS DS/Atlas/JV) (1)

7

2010/C 269/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5880 — Shell/Topaz/JV) (1)

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[ARTICLE]  6
[CIK]  0000903651
[NAME]  INNODATA  CORPORATION


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


INDEPENDENT  AUDITORS'  CONSENT

We  consent  to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Innodata  Corporation  on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-85530, dated October 21,
1994,  Registration  No.  333-3466,  dated  April  11, 1996 and Registration No.
333-63085,  dated September 9, 1998) and on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-3464,
dated  April  11,  1996)  of  our  report dated March 14, 1997, appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Innodata Corporation for the year ended December
31,  1998.

Margolin,  Winer  &  Evens  LLP
Garden  City,  New  York
February  25,  1999
BALDWIN
Baldwin Piano & Organ Company
422 Wards Corner Road
Loveland, Ohio 45140-8390
(513) 576-4500


       BALDWIN PIANO & ORGAN ACTS TO REDUCE EXPENSES


LOVELAND, OHIO, NOVEMBER 12, 1996 -- Baldwin Piano & Organ Company 
(NASDAQ: BPAO) announced today that it is taking significant steps 
to improve its competitiveness by reducing overhead expenses to 
improve earnings.

The first step includes the elimination of about 15 percent of its 
salaried workforce.  This reduction in workforce represents 
approximately 50 salaried positions at four locations: the 
headquarters in Loveland, Ohio; and the manufacturing plants in 
Greenwood, Mississippi; Trumann, Arkansas; and Fayetteville, 
Arkansas.  Today the company notified those employees who will be 
affected.

"Due to the loss of contract manufacturing for two piano companies 
earlier in the year, we must get our overhead costs in line with 
revenues," stated Karen L. Hendricks, CEO and President.  A key 
portion of this lost business was a result of Kimball International's 
decision to exit the piano business.  Ms. Hendricks continued, "It is 
essential we streamline our organization and focus our energy on our 
core businesses and not on the non-strategic contract music and 
furniture business."

On October 24, 1996, Baldwin reported net sales of $79.8 million for 
the nine months which ended September 30, 1996, a decline of 8.2 
percent from net sales of $87.0 million in the same period of 1995.  
Net earnings for the nine months of 1996 decreased to $1.6 million, 
or $0.48 per share, from $2.3 million, or $0.68 per share in the same 
period of 1995.

Baldwin Piano & Organ Company has manufactured and marketed keyboard 
musical products for more than 130 years and has been providing 
consumer financing for its instruments for nearly a century.  The 
market leader in acoustic pianos in the United States, Baldwin also 
manufactures electronic and electro-mechanical components for Original 
Equipment Manufacturers.

                             # # #


CONTACT:  Karen L. Hendricks, (513) 576-4693
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.203 Notice of charges. ( a ) Whenever the NCUA Board determines that grounds for termination of insured status exists, it will, for the purpose of securing correction of errant or illegal conditions, serve a Notice of Charges upon the concerned credit union. This notice will contain a statement describing the unsafe or unsound practices, condition or the relevant violations.
( b ) In the case of an insured State-chartered credit union, the NCUA Board shall send a copy of the Notice of Charges to the appropriate State authority, if any, having supervision over the credit union.
[56 FR 37767, Aug. 8, 1991, as amended at 75 FR 34622, June 18, 2010]
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T VI C E NT A L OP E Z - B OB AD I L L A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 71090 A ge nc yN o. A 072- 168- 238 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 29, 2010 ** B e f o r e : A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , an dG R A B E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . V i c e nt aL ope z - B oba di l l a , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l f r om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f orr e l i e f unde rthe 

# FI LED JU L 12 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 71090 2 N i c ar a guan and C e ntr a lA m e r i c an R e l i e f A c t( “N A C A R A ” ) . W e di s m i s s the p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the agency’ s det erm i nat i on thatL op ez B ob adi l l a w as no tel i gi bl e f or N A C A R A re l i ef

because s he fa i l ed t o est abl i sh that s he t i m e l yr e gi s t e r e d f

orA B C be ne f

i t s , and s he doe s notr a i s e al e ga lor c o n s titu tio n a l qu e s tio n th a t in v o k e s o u rju r is d ic tio n . See L an uza v. H older , 597 F .3 d9 7 0 , 9 7 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ( p e rc u r iam ) . W e l ackj u ri sd i ct i o n t o co n si d er L o p ez-B o b ad i l l a’ s rem ai n i n g co n t en t i o n s, b e c au s e s h e f

a ile dto e x h au s t th e m b e f o r e th e B I A . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 358 F .3 d6 7 4 , 6 7 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) ( e x p la in in g th a t th is c o u rt la c k s ju r is d ic tio n to re vi ew cont ent i on s notra i se d b ef ore the agency) . PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D I SM I SSED .
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.12 Construction of time limits. ( a ) *General rule.* In computing any period of time prescribed by this subpart, the date of the act or event that commences the designated period of time is not included. The last day so computed is included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday. When the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the period runs until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday. Intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays are included in the computation of time. However, when the time period within which an act is to be performed is ten days or less, not including any additional time allowed for in paragraph (c) of this section, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays are not included.
( b ) *When papers are deemed to be filed or served.* ( 1 ) Filing and service are deemed to be effective: ( i ) In the case of transmission by electronic mail or other electronic means, upon transmittal by the serving party;
( ii ) In the case of overnight delivery service or first class, registered, or certified mail, upon deposit in or delivery to an appropriate point of collection; or
( iii ) In the case of personal service or same day courier delivery, upon actual service.
( 2 ) The effective filing and service dates specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section may be modified by the NCUA Board or ALJ in the case of filing or by agreement of the parties in the case of service.
( c ) *Calculation of time for service and filing of responsive papers.* Whenever a time limit is measured by a prescribed period from the service of any notice or paper, the applicable time limits are calculated as follows: ( 1 ) If service is made by electronic mail or other electronic means or by same day courier delivery, add one calendar day to the prescribed period;
( 2 ) If service is made by overnight delivery service, add two calendar days to the prescribed period; or
( 3 ) If service is made by first class, registered, or certified mail, add three calendar days to the prescribed period.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2323 Filed:02/01/18 Entered:02/01/18 10:59:21 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2323 Filed:02/01/18 Entered:02/01/18 10:59:21 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
~ 

### CITYoF 

# PRESCOTT

L1"7 ~~

J lZOf ~ LLt0 ~ ul1! N w Office of the Mayor 201 South Cortez Street Prescott, Arizona 86303

December 24, 2015 Michael Huerta, Administrator Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW Washington, DC 20591 Re: Petition of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd., for an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 110.2 Dear Administrator Huerta: I am writing to urge your action with respect to granting an exemption to the definition of a"Commuter Operation" that was filed by Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. ("Great Lakes"), to allow the use of 19-seat aircraft. Prescott, Arizona, which receives Essential Air Service via the Prescott Municipal Airport (PRC), has suffered seat capacity losses and diminished reliability since the new FAR Part 121 pilot experience requirements were instituted in 2013. We believe granting of the exemption for Great Lakes will restore the quality of commercial air service to Prescott and other small communities, without jeopardizing safety for the flying public. The effect of the 2013 rule change has been to diminish commercial air service in the Prescott region, reducing flights and the seats needed to grow jobs, stimulate economic activity, and transport physicians and other professionals to and from our community. It also reduced Federal Airport Improvement Program funding necessary to implement long-awaited airport safety improvements. Since Great Lakes began operating their aircraft in a 9-seat configuration, the communities served have lost over 380,000 seats. A BE-1900D operation utilizing 19 seats will allow Great Lakes to reinstate seat capacity, and reverse the adverse economic impacts communities have experienced due to passenger enplanement reductions. The exemption will also support the congressionally mandated goals of the Essential Air Service Program. We strongly urge your action in granting Great Lakes an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 110.2 that will allow the use of 19 seats. Thank you for your interest and support of commercial air service to Prescott, Arizona, and like communities, through granting of the requested exemption.


### Sincerely,

}~• ~i~ Harr B.Oberg Mayor
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00352

- CR

T OBY W

AYNE Z IMMERMAN

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 415th District Court

of Parker County ( CR19

- 0202 )

October 29, 2020

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment

of the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
#### § 4.31 Zero percent evaluations.

In every instance where the schedule does not provide a zero percent evaluation for a diagnostic code, a zero percent evaluation shall be assigned when the requirements for a compensable evaluation are not met.

[58 FR 52018, Oct. 6, 1993]