alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SPENCER *v.*BUCHANAN.

Bond in blank — alteration by consent — filling up by consent.

An alteration of a bond, by consent of the parties to it, does not vitiate it.

A special bail bond signed and sealed by the bail, with a blank as to the sum, cannot be declared upon as a blank.

A mere money bond, executed with a blank as to the sum, delivered to one of several of the obligors, and filled up before it was delivered to the obligee, is good, and the delivery to the co-obligor to be used, will be held an authority to fill the blanks.

The plaintiff declares upon a special bail bond for 350 —--, *thereby meaning*$¡350,’) &c.

Defendant craves oyer of the bond, &c. which being set out, shows that the defendant ‘appeared before D. Gano, in open court, being clerk of the Court of Common Pleas, and acknowledged to owe unto Wade. H. Spencer, the sum of three hundred and fifty , to be levied, &c. *R.*Buchanan, with a release of errors.’

He then demurred generally, which is joined.

*Este*and Haines, for the defendant,

contended,

1. That to alter a bond in a material part vitiates it, and cited 4 T. *R.*189; 3 *Esp.*57, 246; 4 *East. R.*203; 1 *Camp. R.*72; 15 *East. R.*29; 3 *Yeates*391; 10 *Sergt. R.*428; 6 *Sergt. R.*361; 9 *Wheat. R.*707, 8.

2. This bond could not be altered by filling up the sum, as that is the material part.

Storer, for the plaintiff.

*584Lane, J.

An alteration of a bond with the consent of the parties to it, does not vitiate it: (9 *Cranch.*37.) In this state, it has been decided that a blank with a signature, seal, and authority to fill *up,'*is void: (1 *O.R.*372.) But mere money bonds, executed with blanks, filled up before negotiated, and received in good faith, are to be treated as commercial or business paper, and the delivery in blank to a party, as an authority to fill up: (5 *O. R.*222; 5 *Mass. R.*508.) This bond is still in blank, not filled up, and the real question is, can you enlarge the substance of it, by mere *inuendo?*We think you cannot. What would be the effect, if the blank were *filled up*by permission of the Common Pleas, or otherwise, we leave uutouched, as the question is not before us.

The demurrer is sustained.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 10234 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. MANUEL ESCAMILLA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13

- CR

- 274

- 2

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Manuel Escamilla, federal prisoner # 08945

- 062 , appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct the record pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. He argues that the district court miscalculated his total offense level, which resulted in an incorrect amended guide lines range, in the order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion. Escamilla also raises

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 18, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-10234 Document: 00514312587 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/18/2018No. 17

- 10234

2 sentencing errors based on Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013)

. In cases where there are no factual d isputes, we review a district court’s denial of a Rule 36 motion de novo. United States v. Mackay , 757 F.3d 195, 197 (5th Cir. 2014)

. Under Rule 36, the district “court may at any time correct a clerical error in a judgment, order, or other part of the r ecord, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight or omission.” F ED

. R. C RIM

. P . 36. However, the rule applies only to clerical errors and not substantive matters. Mackay , 757 F.3d at 197

- 200

. The record does not reflect that there is any error, clerical or otherwise, concerning the calculation of Escamilla’s total offense level. T he proposed change to his total offense level sought by Escamilla is substantive, rather than clerical, in nature and could not be made under Rule 36. See Mackay , 757 F.3d at 200 ; see also United States v. Buendia

Rangel , 553 F.3d 378, 379 ( 5th Cir. 2008 )

. Additionally, Escamilla’s Mathis and Alleyene claims are challenging sentencing errors to which correction under Rule 36 does not apply. See Mackay, 757 F.3d at 200

. Accordingly, the district court’s denial of Escamilla’s motion to correct the record pursuant to Rule 36 is AFFIRMED. Case: 17-10234 Document: 00514312587 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/18/2018
###### Editorial Note on Part 741

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 741 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 741.5 Notice of termination of excess insurance coverage.

In the event of a credit union's termination of share insurance coverage other than that provided by the NCUSIF, the credit union must notify all members in writing of such termination at least thirty days prior to the effective date of termination.
# Official Journal L 153/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 153 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6211 June 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 153

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6211 June 2019

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2019/933 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 amending Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2019/933 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 amending Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24352 Filed:05/22/23 Entered:05/30/23 12:06:35 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24352 Filed:05/22/23 Entered:05/30/23 12:06:35 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24352 Filed:05/22/23 Entered:05/30/23 12:06:35 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We haveissued our report dated June 27, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements and schedule included in the Annual Report of MTI Technology Corporation andsubsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended April 1, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference of said report in the Registration Statements of MTI Technology Corporation on FormsS-8 (Nos. 333-131403, 333-127302, 333-117401, 333-109060, 333-103065, 333-76972, 333-69030,333-66716, 333-95915, 333-92623, 333-85579, 333-61957, 333-46363, 333-50377, 333-18501, 33-75180and 33-80438) and Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-129941, 333-118657 and 333-85410). /S/ GRANT THORNTON LLPIrvine, California
§ 121.423 Pilots: Extended Envelope Training. ( a ) Each certificate holder must include in its approved training program, the extended envelope training set forth in this section with respect to each airplane type for each pilot. The extended envelope training required by this section must be performed in a Level C or higher full flight simulator, approved by the Administrator in accordance with § 121.407 of this part.
( b ) Extended envelope training must include the following maneuvers and procedures: ( 1 ) Manually controlled slow flight;
( 2 ) Manually controlled loss of reliable airspeed;
( 3 ) Manually controlled instrument departure and arrival;
( 4 ) Upset recovery maneuvers; and
( 5 ) Recovery from bounced landing.
( c ) Extended envelope training must include instructor-guided hands on experience of recovery from full stall and stick pusher activation, if equipped.
( d ) Recurrent training: Within 24 calendar months preceding service as a pilot, each person must satisfactorily complete the extended envelope training described in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) and (c) of this section. Within 36 calendar months preceding service as a pilot, each person must satisfactorily complete the extended envelope training described in paragraph (b)(5) of this section.
( e ) Deviation from use of Level C or higher full flight simulator: ( 1 ) A certificate holder may submit a request to the Administrator for approval of a deviation from the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section to conduct the extended envelope training using an alternative method to meet the learning objectives of this section.
( 2 ) A request for deviation from paragraph (a) of this section must include the following information: ( i ) A simulator availability assessment, including hours by specific simulator and location of the simulator, and a simulator shortfall analysis that includes the training that cannot be completed in a Level C or higher full flight simulator; and
( ii ) Alternative methods for achieving the learning objectives of this section.
( 3 ) A certificate holder may request an extension of a deviation issued under this section.
( 4 ) Deviations or extensions to deviations will be issued for a period not to exceed 12 months.
[Doc. No. FAA-2008-0677, 78 FR 67839, Nov. 12, 2013; Amdt. 121-382, 85 FR 10923, Feb. 25, 2020, as amended by Docket No. FAA-2019-0360; Amdt. No. 121-392, 89 FR 51427, June 18, 2024]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 83 (Friday, April 28, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 24897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10524]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-111119-99]
RIN 1545-AX32


Partnership Mergers and Divisions; Hearing Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed 
rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document cancels the public hearing on proposed 
regulations on the tax consequences of partnership mergers and 
divisions.

DATES: The public hearing originally scheduled for Thursday, May 4, 
2000, at 10 a.m., is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LaNita Van Dyke of the Regulations 
Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), (202) 622-7190 (not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice 
of public hearing that appeared in the Federal Register on Tuesday, 
January 11, 2000 (65 FR 1572), announced that a public hearing was 
scheduled for Thursday, May 4, 2000, at 10 a.m., in room 2615, Internal 
Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The 
subject of the public hearing is proposed regulations under section 708 
of the Internal Revenue Code. The public comment period for these 
proposed regulations expired on Monday, April 10, 2000. The outlines of 
topics to be addressed at the hearing were due on Thursday, April 13, 
2000.
    The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing, 
instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to 
submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. 
As of Friday, April 21, 2000, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, 
the public hearing scheduled for Thursday, May 4, 2000, is cancelled.

Cynthia Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 00-10524 Filed 4-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 32 (b)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the
quarter ended September 30, 2003, I, J. Robert Buchanan, Treasurer (Chief
Financial Officer) of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

        (2)the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.



_/s/ J. ROBERT BUCHANAN_
 ----------------------
J. Robert Buchanan
Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3733 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 562
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3733

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                              June 7, 2004

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 410 Huston Street in Altamont, Kansas, as the ``Myron V. George Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 410 
Huston Street in Altamont, Kansas, shall be known and designated as the 
``Myron V. George Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Myron V. George Post 
Office''.

                                                       Calendar No. 562

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3733

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 410 Huston Street in Altamont, Kansas, as the ``Myron V. George Post 
                               Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 7, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 345

To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled Substances 

Import and Export Act with respect to penalties for powder cocaine 

and crack cocaine offenses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2003

Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 

Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled 

Substances Import and Export Act with respect to penalties for powder cocaine and crack cocaine offenses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Powder-Crack Cocaine 

5 Penalty Equalization Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 345 IH 

1 SEC. 2. TRAFFICKING. 

2 (a) 50-GRAM PENALTY.—Section 401(b)(1)(A) of the 

3 Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(A)) is 

4 amended—

5 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘5 kilograms’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘50 grams’’; and 

7 (2) by striking clause (iii). 

8 (b) 5-GRAM PENALTY.—Section 401(b)(1)(B) of the 

9 Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(B)) is 

10 amended—

11 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘500 grams’’ and 

12 inserting ‘‘5 grams’’; and 

13 (2) by striking clause (iii). 

14 SEC. 3. POSSESSION. 

15 Section 404(a) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

16 U.S.C. 844(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘cocaine base’’ and 

17 inserting ‘‘any controlled substance described in section 

18 401(b)(1)(A)(ii)’’. 

19 SEC. 4. IMPORT AND EXPORT. 

20 (a) 50-GRAM PENALTY.—Section 1010(b)(1) of the 

21 Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 

22 960(b)(1)) is amended—

23 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘5 kilo24 grams’’ and inserting ‘‘50 grams’’; and 

25 (2) by striking subparagraph (C). 
3

•HR 345 IH 

1 (b) 5-GRAM PENALTY.—Section 1010(b)(2) of the 

2 Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 

3 960(b)(2)) is amended—

4 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘500 

5 grams’’ and inserting ‘‘5 grams’’; and 

6 (2) by striking subparagraph (C).

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Due Date: February 21, 2023, 5:00 p.m. (AST)

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al.,

Debtors

 

PROMESA

Title III

Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of 

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY, 

Debtor

PROMESA 

Title III 

Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS

INFORMATIVE MOTION OF PV PROPERTIES, INC. REGARDING APPEARANCE 

AT FEBRUARY 28, 2023 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT HEARING

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

PV Properties, Inc. (“PV Properties”), by its undersigned counsel, hereby submits this 

informative motion in response to the Court’s Order Regarding Procedures for February 28, 

2023, Disclosure Statement Hearing [ECF No. 23525] (the “Order”) setting forth guidelines for 

parties wishing to be heard at the February 28, 2023 hearing (the “Hearing”). 

1. PV Properties’ Appearance Sheet is attached as Exhibit A. 

San Juan, Puerto Rico this 17

th day of February 2023

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: We hereby certify that on this same date we 

electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which 

will send notification of such filing to all CM/ECF participants.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23571 Filed:02/17/23 Entered:02/17/23 15:29:59 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

s/Fernando E. Agrait 

USDC-PR 127212

701 Avenida Ponce de León

Edificio Centro de Seguros 

Oficina 414

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00907

Tel. 787-725-3390/3391

Fax: 787-724-0353

E-mail: agraitfe@agraitlawpr.com

s/Charles A. Cuprill-Hernandez

USDC-PR 114312

Charles A. Cuprill, P.S.C., Law Offices

356 Fortaleza Street - Second Floor

San Juan, PR 00901

Tel.: 787-977-0515

Fax: 787-977-0518

E-mail: cacuprill@cuprill.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23571 Filed:02/17/23 Entered:02/17/23 15:29:59 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1****Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification**I, Montgomery Bannerman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006of Verso Technologies, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: May 12, 2006       /s/ Montgomery Bannerman     Montgomery Bannerman,    Chief Executive Officer