N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT

B UDDY P. KAM AKEEAINA,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt,

v. TYLER M AALO, B a dge No. 101980, Honolulu Polic e De pa

rtm e nt Offic e r; e t a l., De fe nda

n ts-Appe lle e s. No. 14-16042 D.C . No. 1:11-c v-00770-JM S-R L P

M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Sta t e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ha

wa ii J. M ic ha e l Se a

bright, C hie f Judge , Pre siding Argue d a nd Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 21, 2017 Honolulu, Ha

wa ii B e fore : KOZINSKI, HAW K INS, a nd B EA, C irc uit Judge s. B uddy Ka m a ke e a i na a

ppe a ls from t

he a dve rse gra nts of sum

m a ry judgm e nt to H o n o lulu Polic e De pa

rtm e nt (HPD) offic e rs a n d Drs. Tom L e la

nd a n d Pe ter Ya m a m oto in his 42 U.S.C

. § 1983 a c tion a lle ging the HPD o ffic e rs a nd Drs. Le la n d 

# F IL ED
MAR 14 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U

. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* T his disposition is not a

ppropria te for public a t ion a nd i s not pre c e d e nt e xc e pt a s provide d by

Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.a nd Ya m a m oto w e re de libe ra te ly indiffe re nt to his m e dic a l ne e ds. W e ha ve

jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C

. § 1291, a nd we a ffirm

. Ka m a ke e a ina h a s n ot c re at ed a tr i ab le issue of fa c t a s to whe the r the HPD offic e rs we re subje c tive ly a wa re of a risk of ha rm to Ka m a ke e a ina a fte r h is a rre st. Se e C onn v . C ity of Re no , 591 F.3d 1081, 1 096-98 (9th C ir. 2010), v ac ate d , 563 U.S. 915 (2011), re i nstate d in re le v a nt p a r t , 6 58 F.3d 897 (9th C ir. 2011). Nor is the re suffic i e nt e viden ce tha t t he HPD offic e rs a c te d with re c kle s s disre ga rd for Ka m a ke e a ina ’ s he a lth. S e e C astro v . C o unty of Los Ang el es , 833 F.3d 1060, 1071 ( 9 t h C i r. 2016) (e n ba

n c ). W hile Ka m a k e e a ina ha d e a rlie r a tte m

pte d s uic ide a nd, in
t h e p r ese nc e of the HPD o ffic e rs, thre a t e ne d t o c om m i t suic i de by j um

ping from a ba lc ony , he s ubse que n tly a gre e d to le a ve the ba lc ony , p e a c e fully subm itte d to a rre st,

a nd wa s tra ns p o r t ed t o j a il w ithout inc ide nt. M o re ove r, t he HPD offic e rs did not know of Ka m a ke e a i na ’ s pre vious suic ide a tte m pts or his m e nta l h e a lth h i s t o r y. Se e C onn , 591 F.3d a t 1097. Ac c ordingly , the re wa s no e rror in gra n ti n g sum m a ry judgm e nt to the HPD offic e rs. No r ha s Ka m a ke e a ina c re a te d tria b l e issue s of fa c t a s to whe t he r Drs. Le la

n d

a nd Ya m a m oto we re subje c t ive ly a wa re of a risk of ha rm to Ka m a ke e a ina , se e C onn , 591 F.3d a t 1096

- 98, or whe the r Dr. Le la nd a c te d with re c k le ss disre ga rd for Ka m a ke e a ina ’ s he a lth, s e e Ca stro , 833 F.3d a t 1071. Dr. Le la nd a sse sse d

2Ka m a ke e a ina a s sta ble a n d co m m e n te d, in his c o nte m pora ne ous note s, tha t Ka m a ke e a ina ha d a good tre a tm e nt pla n. Dr. Ya m a m oto dia gnose d Ka m a ke e a ina a n d

c onc lude d m e dic a t ion a nd psy c h othe ra py we re ina

ppropria te
. Ac c ordingly , the re wa s

a lso no e rror in gra

n t ing sum m a ry judgm e n t to Drs. Le l a nd a nd Ya m a m oto. AFFIRM E D.

3