alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3068 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3068

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2055 Siesta Drive in Sarasota, Florida, as the ``Brigadier General 
                (AUS-Ret.) John H. McLain Post Office''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3068

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2055 Siesta Drive in Sarasota, Florida, as the ``Brigadier General 
                (AUS-Ret.) John H. McLain Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2055 
Siesta Drive in Sarasota, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 
``Brigadier General (AUS-Ret.) John H. McLain Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Brigadier General (AUS-Ret.) 
John H. McLain Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 20, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
February 21, 2012

Docket Management Facility U.S. Department of Transportation
Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0089 1200 New Jersey Avenue SA West Building Grand Floor, Room W

- 120140 Washington, DC 20590

RE: Sun Country Slot Exemption, Docket Number FFA

Michigan Farm Bureau support s Sun Country Airlines’ request for an exemption from the slot limit for Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA). The proposed slots would replace two slot exemptions under DOT Order 2010

- 12

- 16 that were awarded to Sun Country, for service from Minneapolis (MSP) and Lansing, Michigan (LAN) to DCA.

Due to the January 6, 2012 U

. S

. Court of Appeals ruling, the DOT order was vacated and Sun Country will lose its existing direct flight service between Lansing and Washington, D.C.

Michigan Farm Bureau incurs regular travel between mid

- Michigan and Washington, D.C. The direct flight offered by Sun Country provides a tremendous benefit by saving time and reducing
travel costs. Farmer members and Farm Bureau staff purchase mor e than 100 seats annually. The direct flight offered by Sun Country has become a very effective tool at improving the travel experience for both our members and staff.

Michigan Farm Bureau supports the immediate approval of this exemption request.

Tha nk you for your consideration of our request.

Sincerely,

Ryan Findlay National Legislative Counsel
Exhibit 3.3

                            CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION

                                     TO THE

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          TURBOSONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

TURBOSONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of The General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

The name of the corporation is TurboSonic Technologies, Inc. Prior to the filing
of the Amended Certificate referred to below, the name of the corporation was
Sonic Environmental Systems, Inc.

That a Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the
corporation (the "Amended Certificate") was filed by the Secretary of State of
Delaware on August 27, 1997 and that the Amended Certificate requires correction
as permitted by subsection (f) of Section 103 of The General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.

The inaccuracy or defect of the Amended Certificate to be corrected is as
follows: the text of the amendment to Article FOURTH of the Certificate of
Incorporation of the corporation set forth therein is internally inconsistent in
its recitation of the number of authorized shares of the corporation.

New Article FOURTH of the Certificate of Incorporation of the corporation, as
set forth in Section 2 of the Amended Certificate, is corrected to read as
follows:

      "FOURTH: The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the
      Corporation is authorized to issue is thirty million one thousand five
      hundred (30,001,500) shares, of which thirty million (30,000,000) shares
      shall be common stock with a par value of ten cents ($.10) per share, and
      one thousand five hundred (1,500) shares shall be preferred stock, with no
      par value. The preferred stock may be issued in classes or series from
      time to time with such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting
      powers, and such designations, preferences and relative, participating,
      optional, or other special rights, and qualifications, limitations or
      restrictions thereof, as shall be stated and expressed in the certificate
      of incorporation or any


                                       1
<PAGE>

      amendment thereto, or in the resolution or resolutions providing for the
      issue of such stock adopted by the board of directors pursuant to
      authority expressly vested in it by the provisions of its certificate of
      incorporation and to the full extent permitted by Section 151 of the
      General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware."

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TurboSonic Technologies, Inc. has caused this Certificate to
be signed this 29th day of August, 2001.


                                                     /s/ Patrick J. Forde
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Patrick J. Forde, President


                                        2
§ 722.6 Professional association membership; competency. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 64575 , Aug. 7, 2024.
( a ) *Membership in appraisal organization.* A state-certified appraiser or a state-licensed appraiser may not be excluded from consideration for an assignment for a federally related transaction solely by virtue of membership or lack of membership in any particular appraisal organization.
( b ) *Competency.* All staff and fee appraisers performing appraisals in connection with federally related transactions must be state-certified or -licensed as appropriate. However, a state-certified or -licensed appraiser may not be considered competent solely by virtue of being certified or licensed. Any determination of competency shall be based upon the individual's experience and educational background as they relate to the particular appraisal assignment for which he or she is being considered.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                             EMERGING GAMMA CORPORATION
                                             --------------------------

                                              STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                              ------------------------

                                     FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001
                                    --------------------------------------------


                                                                                    2002           2001
                                                                                   -------        ------
<S>                                                                                <C>            <C>

INTEREST INCOME                                                                    $ 8,949        $18,805

COSTS AND EXPENSES                                                                 (15,566)       (19,156)
                                                                                   -------        -------

NET LOSS BEFORE TAX PROVISON                                                        (6,617)          (352)

TAX PROVISION                                                                          -             -
                                                                                   -------        -------

NET LOSS                                                                           $(6,617)       $  (352)
                                                                                   =======        =======

BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE                                                   $  (.15)       $  (.01)
                                                                                   =======        =======

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF BASIC AND DILUTED
    SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                              43,600         43,600
                                                                                   =======        =======


                    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
</TABLE>

                                                     F-4
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Geophysical Unit of Menlo Park, Calif.

##### U.S. Geological SurveyOpen-File Report 2006-1160Version 1.0

#### In Cooperation with the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA)

# Geophysical Data from the Spring and Snake Valleys Area, Nevada and Utah

### *By* Edward A. Mankinen, Carter W. Roberts, Edwin H. McKee, Bruce A. Chuchel, and Barry C. Moring

#### 2006

*Depth to pre-Cenozoic basement (from figure 10)*

The Spring and Snake Valleys area of Nevada and Utah are two of the major ground-water recharge areas in the eastern part of the Great Basin that were investigated in order to characterize the geophysical framework of the region.  Although gravity coverage was extensive over parts of the study area, data were sparse for much of Spring Valley.  We addressed this lack of data by establishing five hundred and forty-five new gravity stations in the region.  All available gravity data for the study area were then evaluated to determine their reliability, prior to calculating an isostatic residual gravity map of the area that can be used for subsequent analyses.  A gravity inversion method was used to calculate depths to pre-Cenozoic basement rock and estimates of maximum alluvial/volcanic fill in the major valleys of the study area.  The enhanced gravity coverage and the incorporation of lithologic information from several deep oil and gas wells yields a much improved view of subsurface shapes of these basins and will provide insights useful for the development of hydrogeologic models for the region.

Download this report as a 39-page PDF file (of2006-1160.pdf; 5.8 MB)

Download the gravity data as an Excel .xls file.  This is Table 1 as a spreadsheet that contains the data on nearly 550 gravity stations (of2006-1160_table1.xls; 96 KB)

For questions about the content of this report, contact Ed Mankinen

Version history

----

Download a copy of the latest version of Adobe Reader for free.

| Help | PDF help | Publications main page || Western Open-File Reports for 2006 || Geologic Division | Geophysical Unit of Menlo Park, Calif. (GUMP) |
This report is available only on the Web

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey	URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1160/	Page Contact Information: Michael Diggles	Page Last Modified: October 20, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

11:00 a.m., Friday, May 26, 2000.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW, Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-10349 Filed 4-21-00; 11:35 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
§ 708a.101 Definitions. As used in this part: *Clear and conspicuous* means text in bold type in a font size at least one size larger than any other text used in the document (exclusive of headings), but in no event smaller than 12 point.
*Conducted by an independent entity* means: ( 1 ) The independent entity will receive the ballots directly from voting members.
( 2 ) After the conclusion of the special meeting that ends the ballot period, the independent entity will open all the ballots in its possession and tabulate the results. The entity must not open or tabulate any ballots before the conclusion of the special meeting.
( 3 ) The independent entity will certify the final vote tally in writing to the credit union and provide a copy to the NCUA Regional Director. The certification will include, at a minimum, the number of members who voted, the number of affirmative votes, and the number of negative votes. During the course of the voting period the independent entity may provide the credit union with the names of members who have not yet voted, but may not provide any voting results to the credit union prior to certifying the final vote tally.
*Credit union* has the same meaning as *insured credit union* in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1752).
*Federal banking agencies* have the same meaning as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).
*Independent entity* means a company with experience in conducting corporate elections. No official or senior management official of the credit union, or the immediate family member of any official or senior management official, may have any ownership interest in, or be employed by, the entity.
*Mutual savings bank* and *savings association* have the same meaning as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).
*Regional Director* means either the director for the NCUA Regional Office for the region where a natural person credit union's main office is located or the director of the NCUA's Office of Credit Union Resources and Expansion. For corporate credit unions and natural person credit unions defined as ONES credit unions under part 700 of this chapter, Regional Director means the Director of NCUA's Office of National Examinations and Supervision.
*Secret ballot* means no credit union employee or official can determine how a particular member voted. Credit union employees and officials are prohibited from assisting members in completing ballots or handling completed ballots.
*Senior management official* means a chief executive officer, an assistant chief executive officer, a chief financial officer, and any other senior executive officer as defined by the appropriate federal banking agencies pursuant to section 32(f) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.
[71 FR 77167, Dec. 22, 2006. Redesignated and amended at 75 FR 81386, Dec. 28, 2010; 76 FR 13505, Mar. 14, 2011; 78 FR 32544, May 31, 2013; 81 FR 76496, Nov. 3, 2016; 82 FR 60292, Dec. 20, 2017; 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019; 86 FR 15401, Mar. 23, 2021; 87 FR 45009, July 27, 2022]
§ 121.420 Pilots: Upgrade ground training. ( a ) Upgrade ground training must include instruction in at least the following subjects as applicable to the duties assigned to the pilot in command: ( 1 ) Seat dependent procedures, as applicable;
( 2 ) Duty position procedures, as applicable; and
( 3 ) Crew resource management, including decision making, authority and responsibility, and conflict resolution.
( b ) In addition to the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section, upgrade ground training must include instruction and facilitated discussion on the following: ( 1 ) Leadership and command, including flightcrew member duties under § 121.542; and
( 2 ) Mentoring, including techniques for reinforcing the highest standards of technical performance, airmanship, and professional development in newly hired pilots.
[Amdt. 121-382, 85 FR 10923, Feb. 25, 2020 as amended by Docket No. FAA-2019-0360; Amdt. No. 121-392, 89 FR 51427, June 18, 2024]
EXHIBIT A1

PARTY APPEARANCE SHEET

Name 

Law Firm 

Email 

Phone Number 

Docket Entry No. of 

Notice of Appearance 

Notice of Appearance 

ADDITIONAL

ATTORNEY

Complete the below 

information for each 

attorney appearing for 

observation purposes. 

Name 

x CourtSolutions

Listen Only

x In Person – NY

x In Person – PR

Law Firm 

Email 

Phone Number 

1 This Party Appearance Sheet must be attached to a party in interest’s Informative Motion as 

Exhibit A.

Attorneys who wish to view but not participate in the hearing may gain admittance to the San Juan 

Courtroom or New York Courtroom, on a first-come first-served basis. All attorneys who wish to 

observe in person must be listed on this appearance sheet.

Name of Party 

ATTORNEY 1 Appearance Method In Person NY2

230526 EXHIBIT A. APPEARANCE SHEET VERSION MAY 26, 2023

ATTORNEY 2 Appearance Method In Person NY

Law Firm 

Email 

Phone Number 

Docket Entry No. of 

CarolinaVelaz-Rivero

cvelaz@mpmlawpr.com 

Marini Pietrantoni MuÒiz, LLC

(787) 705-2171

NOA - Docket No. 2683

Appearing in Person - PR

Luis C. Marini Biaggi

lmarini@mpmlawpr.com 

Marini Pietrantoni MuÒiz, LLC

(787) 705-2171

NOA - Docket No. 2682

Appearing in Person - PR

Gabriel L. Olivera

O'Melveny & Myers LLP

golivera@omm.com

(212) 728-5827

Docket No. 20102

O'Melveny & Myers LLP

Peter Friedman

pfriedman@omm.com

PHV Admission - Docket No. 153

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24354-1 Filed:05/30/23 Entered:05/30/23 12:16:13 Desc:

Exhibit A - Party Appearance Sheet Page 1 of 1
#### HARRIET RICHARDS *v.*JOHN D. RICHARDS.

Divorce — adultery—name of the adulterer — leave to amend.

In a bill for divorce for adultery, the name of the person with whom committed must be stated if known.

Divorce. Causes alleged, ‘ extreme cruelty, adultery with another woman, desertion, and confinement in the penitentiary of Pennsylvania *for infracting criminal*laws.’

Court.

Do you propose to offer proof upon all these charges?

*Counsel.*We will only offer proof as to the charge of adultery.

Court. You can introduce no evidence as to that charge under this petition. It has been the uniform practice to require the name of the person with whom adultery is charged to be set out if known, or if unknown- to allege that excuse.

The complainant then asked and obtained leave to amend her bill, and the cause was continued.
The Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the 1

Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-1384

___________

Bruce Bell, Jr., *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United

States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of

Arkansas.

Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner, *

Social Security Administration, *

(UNPUBLISHED)

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: October 3, 1997

 Filed: October 14,

1997 

___________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Bruce Bell, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 1

granting summary judgment affirming the Commissioner’s

decision to deny Bell disability insurance benefits and

supplemental security income. After reviewing the record

and the parties’ submissions, we conclude the
-2-

Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial

evidence on the 
-3-

record as a whole. See Piepgras v. Chater, 76 F.3d 233,

236 (8th Cir. 1996) (standard of review). We further

conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion

in denying Bell’s motion to supplement the record and

remand. See Geigle v. Sullivan, 961 F.2d 1395, 1397 (8th

Cir. 1992) (standard of review); Woolf v. Shalala, 3 F.3d

1210, 1215 (8th Cir. 1993) (circumstances permitting 42

U.S.C. § 405(g) remand).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district

court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3731

To require the Secretary of Defense to reimburse members of the Armed 

Forces who participated in the Department of Defense Rest and Recuperation Leave program for travel expenses incurred by or on behalf of 

such members before the program was expanded to include domestic 

travel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2004

Mr. RAMSTAD (for himself, Mr. MOORE, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, and Mr. POMEROY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Defense to reimburse members 

of the Armed Forces who participated in the Department 

of Defense Rest and Recuperation Leave program for 

travel expenses incurred by or on behalf of such members 

before the program was expanded to include domestic 

travel.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3731 IH 

1 SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAVEL COSTS IN2 CURRED BY MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

3 FORCES UNDER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

4 REST AND RECUPERATION LEAVE PROGRAM. 

5 The Secretary of Defense shall reimburse each mem6 ber of the Armed Forces who participated in the Depart7 ment of Defense Rest and Recuperation Leave program 

8 during the period beginning on September 15, 2003, and 

9 ending on December 18, 2003, for travel expenses in10 curred by the member, or by family members on behalf 

11 of the member, to travel to or from a designated embar12 kation point for the program before the program was ex13 panded to include a domestic travel component.

Æ
§ 313.141 Notification to OPM. When making a request for administrative offset under § 313.140, the FDIC shall provide OPM with a written certification that: ( a ) The debtor owes the FDIC a debt, including the amount of the debt;
( b ) The FDIC has complied with the applicable statutes, regulations, and procedures of OPM; and
( c ) The FDIC has complied with the requirements of 31 CFR parts 900 through 904, including any required hearing or review.