alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24948]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLOROR957000-L62510000-PM000: HAG10-0001]


Filing of Plats of Survey: Oregon/Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the following described lands are 
scheduled to be officially filed in the Bureau of Land Management 
Oregon/Washington State Office, Portland, Oregon, 30 days from the date 
of this publication.

Willamette Meridian

Oregon
    T. 39 S., R. 3 E., accepted September 21, 2009
    T. 29 S., R. 12 W., accepted September 25, 2009
    T. 27 S., R. 3 W., accepted September 30, 2009
    T. 27 S., R. 4 W., accepted September 30, 2009
    T. 30 S., R. 8 W., accepted September 30, 2009
Washington
    T. 21 N., R. 12 W., accepted September 21, 2009
    T. 12 N., R. 17 E., accepted September 28, 2009


ADDRESSES: A copy of the plats may be obtained from the Land Office at 
the Oregon/Washington State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 333 SW. 
1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204, upon required payment. A person or 
party who wishes to protest against a survey must file a notice that 
they wish to protest (at the above address) with the Oregon/Washington 
State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oregon.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief, Branch of Geographic Sciences, 
Bureau of Land Management, 333 SW. 1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204.

    Dated: October 7, 2009.
Fred O'Ferrall,
Branch of Lands and Minerals Resources.
[FR Doc. E9-24948 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
#### Herman Meyers, Respondent, *v.*Hannah Freud, Appellant.

Appeal from'a judgment of the Oity Court of the city of New York in favor of the plaintiff and from an order denying a new trial on the minutes. The action was by the plaintiff, as assignee of Sarah Ufland, as upon an account stated between her and the defendant. Sarah Ufland had placed goods on sale with the defendant, who was to render weekly statements to, and pay on demand the balance due to Sarah Ufland. The defendant having failed to do so, Sarah Ufland removed her goods.

Edwin L. Kalish (J. Culbert Palmer, of counsel), for appellant.

Abraham Levy, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment must be affirmed; it clearly appears that the plaintiff’s assignor was justified in terminating the *807■contract made between her and the defendant, because the latter not only failed to pay the sum of money which the defendant admitted was owing thereunder, but refused to do so until she was ■ready and willing. Under these circumstances, the election made ¡to end the contract, and the removal of the goods owned by the plaintiff’s assignor from the defendant’s premises, were just and reasonable acts.

Judgment affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Present: Fitzsimons, Oh. J., and Has call, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13

             Directors, Key Consultant, and Named Executive Officers
                              who are Parties to a
                        Incentive Stock Option Agreement

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                Number of Shares of Mariner Energy, LLC,
                                        Common Stock Subject to
Name                                    Stock Option Agreement
----                                    -----------------------
<S>                             <C>
Scott D. Josey                                      0
Michael A. Wichterich                          20,568
David S. Huber                                      0
Cory L. Loegering                              48,456
Dalton A. Polasek                                   0
Judd Hansen                                         0
Mike van den bold                               8,232
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Juliet M. Reising, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Verso Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
            ended March 31, 2005 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Sections 78m or 78o(d)); and

      2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

Dated: May 9, 2005

                                                 /s/ Juliet M. Reising
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 Juliet M. Reising,
                                                 Executive Vice President and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### Sec. 1-7 Interpretation of accounts.

To the end that uniform accounting may be maintained, questions involving matters of accounting significance which are not clearly provided for should be submitted to the Director, Office of Airline Information, K-25, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, for explanation, interpretation, or resolution.

[Amdt. 241-58, 54 FR 5591, Feb. 6, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 66723, Dec. 26, 1995]
<PAGE>

December 19, 2002


Mr. Lyle Newkirk
3024 Margaret Mitchell Court
Atlanta, Ga. 30327

Dear Lyle,

I would like to clarify your employment status in the event that a material
change of control ("Material Change") should occur. For purposes of this letter,
a Material Change shall be defined as a transaction in which after such
transaction the assets or substantially all of the assets of T/R Systems, Inc.
("T/R") are held by a corporation or person (either T/R or an acquiring person)
and less than a majority of the combined voting power of the then outstanding
securities of such corporation or person immediately after such transaction are
held (directly or indirectly) in the aggregate by the holders of the common
stock of T/R immediately prior to such transaction.

If a Material Change occurs and if you are not offered a position of similar
stature and compensation within the new entity, the following shall occur:

         1.       Your salary shall continue to be paid on a regular basis for
                  the immediate twelve (12) month period following the date of
                  the Material Change (known as the "Termination Date") at the
                  rate immediately prior to the Termination Date.

         2.       A prorated portion of any targeted bonus amount achieved for
                  the year or period that includes the Termination Date shall be
                  paid within three months of the Termination Date.

         3.       Your employee health plan and other insurance benefits shall
                  continue for the immediate twelve (12) month period following
                  the Termination Date.

         4.       Your employment, for purposes of stock option vesting, shall
                  continue during the immediate twelve (12) month period
                  following the Termination Date.

Sincerely,


/s/ Michael E. Kohlsdorf


Michael E. Kohlsdorf
President and Chief Executive Officer
T/R Systems, Inc.

CC:      Hal Gaffin, Philip Gianos, Barbara Pellow


<PAGE>

        SCHEDULE OF SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTICAL CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENTS


         Pursuant to Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the Change of
Control Agreements with Michael Barry, Michael Liess and E. Neal Tompkins are
not being filed as exhibits to the registrant's annual report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003 (the "2003 Annual Report"). The Change of
Control Agreements with Messrs. Barry, Liess and Tompkins are substantially
identical in all material respects to the Change of Control Agreement with Mr.
Newkirk, which is filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the 2003 Annual Report, except with
respect to the parties thereto and the dates of execution.
The Huntington Mortgage Company
7575 Huntington Park Drive
Columbus, Ohio 43235

(logo)

Report of Management

We, as members  of  management  of The  Huntington  Mortgage  Company  (HMC),  a
wholly-owned  subsidiary of The Huntington  National Bank, are  responsible  for
complying  with the minimum  servicing  standards  as set forth in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers  (USAP).  We are  also  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining
effective  internal  control  over  compliance  with  these  standards.  We have
performed an evaluation of HMC's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
as set forth in the USAP as of  December  3l, 1998 and for the year then  ended.
Based on this  evaluation,  we assert that  during the year ended  December  3l,
1998,  HMC  complied,  in all  material  respects,  with the  minimum  servicing
standards set forth in the USAP.

As of and for this same period,  HMC had in effect a fidelity bond in the amount
of $40,000,000 and an errors and omissions policy in the amount of $10,000,000.


Thomas J. Finnegan III
President and Chief Executive Officer

Irving A. Adler
Senior Vice President

March 10, 1999
----

OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 19 April 2004

at the request of the Council of the European Union concerning a proposal for a Council regulation concerning the compilation and transmission of data on the quarterly government debt

(COM(2003) 761 final)

(CON/2004/14)

(2004/C 134/08)

Done at Frankfurt am Main on 19 April 2004.

The President of the ECB

Jean-Claude TRICHET

----

(1)OJ L 332, 31.12.1993, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 351/2002.

(2)OJ L 29, 4.2.2000, p. 4.

(3)OJ L 179, 9.7.2002, p. 1.

(4)OJ L 81, 19.3.2004, p. 1.

----
§ 1206.308 Referrals and consultations within NASA or other Federal Agencies. ( a ) Referrals and consultations can occur within the Agency or outside the Agency.
( b ) If a FOIA office (other than the Office of Inspector General) receives a request for records in its possession that another NASA FOIA office has responsibility over or is substantially concerned with, it will either: ( 1 ) Consult with the other FOIA office before deciding whether to release or withhold the records; or
( 2 ) Refer the request, along with the records, to that FOIA office for direct response.
( c ) If the FOIA office that originally received the request refers all or part of the request to another FOIA office within the Agency for further processing, they will notify the requester of the partial referral and provide that FOIA contact information.
( d ) If while responding to a request, the FOIA office locates records that originated with another Federal agency, it will generally refer the request and any responsive records to that other agency for a release determination and direct response.
( e ) If the FOIA office refers all the records to another agency, it will document the referral and maintain a copy of the records that it refers; notify the requester of the referral in writing, unless that identification will itself disclose a sensitive, exempt fact; and will provide the contact information for the other agency and if known, the name of a contact at the other agency.
( f ) If the FOIA office locates records that originated with another Federal agency while responding to a request, the office will make the release determination itself (after consulting with the originating agency) when: ( 1 ) The record is of primary interest to NASA (for example, a record may be of primary interest to NASA if it was developed or prepared according to Agency regulations or directives, or in response to an Agency request); or
( 2 ) NASA is in a better position than the originating agency to assess whether the record is exempt from disclosure; or
( 3 ) The originating agency is not subject to the FOIA; or
( 4 ) It is more efficient or practical depending on the circumstances.
( g ) If the FOIA office receives a request for records that another Federal agency has classified under any applicable executive order concerning record classification, it must refer the request to that agency for response.
( h ) If the FOIA office receives a request for records that are under the purview of another Federal agency, the office will return the request to the requester and may advise the requester to submit it directly to another agency. The FOIA office will then close the request.
( i ) All consultations and referrals received by the Agency will be handled according to the date that the FOIA request initially was received by the first FOIA office.
First Union Mortgage Corporation
201 South College Street
Charlotte North Carolina 28288
704 374-6787

(logo)

MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1998, First Union Mortgage Corporation
has complied in all material respects with the minimum  servicing  standards set
forth  in  the  Mortgage  Bankers   Association  of  America's   Uniform  Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers.  First Union Mortgage  Corporation had
in effect a fidelity  bond  policy in the amount of $100  million for the period
from January I, 1998 to May 31, 1998 and a fidelity bond policy in the amount of
$200 million for the period from June 1, 1998 to December  31,  1998.  As of and
for the year ended December 31, 1998,  First Union Mortgage  Corporation  had in
effect an errors and omissions policy in the amount of $20 million.

Karin Patrick, Senior Vice President
March 26, 1999 Date


Debbie Craig, Senior Vice President
March 26, 1999 Date


Debbie Warren, President
March 26, 1999 Date
20 21 22

Old Daves Creek

29 28 27

l Hil Road

na n C

Ti

32 33 34

Tin Can Hill

Travel Managment Area

Alternative A

R15E

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Miles

Map 131

Wyoming

T

2

N

Location Map

Montana

Billings 

Field 

Office

Map scale 1:24,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Ü Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

90

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Legend

Recommend Routes

Administrative Use Only: 3 Miles

Streams

Bureau of Land Management

Private 

Public Lands Survey System

Tin Can Hill Travel Managment Area

Roads
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1030 PLATE 26

(fig. 73),

MEDINA

OG
va BLAS
MEDINA
Plowed field
b11-247,248,249

13°30"

Ne

TRUE NORTH
—
ORT

MAGNE; Te

EXPLANATION

Arkosie pebble conglomerate

Arkosic sandstone

Sangre de Cristo formation

PENNSYLVANIAN AND PERMIAN(?)

2

g

7 2

\ e

Red shale and siltstone, z

undifferentiated 6

2

E

ee 5
Gray shale

16

Lithologie contact, showing dip; dashed where
iP w

ferred, dotted where con
a5
Strike and dip of beds
90
as
Strike of vertical beds
Outerop of copper minerals
or radioactive materials
& 25-336
Prospect trench
Location number‘semple numbers

ae
Fence

|

INTERIOR—GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. WASHINGTON, D~G-

Geology by D.C. Laub and C. M. Tschanz, 1953

GEOLOGIC MAP OF AREA B SHOWING URANIUM DEPOSITS,

COYOTE DISTRICT, MORA COUN

200 oO
bi 1

TY, NEW MEXICO

400 Feet
J
#### THE STATE v. HASLEPS.

Contempt — witness making efforts to get to court not in contempt — process in, not to redress the injury to the party, but to punish.

Where a witness intends to obey the process, and has made efforts to attend, he will not be fined if he does not arrive until half an hour after the time specified in the subpoena.

Process of contempt is to punish the disobedient witness, not redress the party subpoenaing him; for his injury he has his action. ’

Attachment for contempt. of court for non attendance as a witness.

On interrogatories, the defendant showed that he had been some time sick and was unable to walk. He intended to obey the subpoena, and to have been at coui-t in season. He started as early as he could get his horse caught this morning, and arrived half an hour after the time specified in the subpoena.

By the Court.

There seems no intention to contemn the process of the court by this witness; on the contrary, he made an effort to obey, to the extent of his ability. The attachment is to punish for disobeying the process of the court wilfully, not to redress the party injured by the absence of the witness; for that injury he has his action. The defendant is discharged at the costs of the applicant for the writ.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 08065**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### x 08065\08065_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 08065\08065_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 08065\08065_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 08065\08065_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 08065\08065_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 08065\08065_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 08065\08065_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 08065\08065_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 08065\Certification Statement Plant ID 08065.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 08065\Supplemental Documents\08065_2010-09-15 Effluent Guidelines Certification.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 08065\Supplemental Documents\08065_PartA_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 08065\Supplemental Documents\08065_PartA_MAP-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 08065\Supplemental Documents\08065_PartA_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 08065\Supplemental Documents\08065_PartC_Bottom Ash Block Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 08065\Supplemental Documents\08065_PartC_Bottom Ash Pyrite_Economizer.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 08065\Supplemental Documents\08065_PartD_FGD Pond 1 Closure Plan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# Official Journal L 114/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.114.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 114 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 527 May 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.114.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 114

English edition

Legislation

Volume 527 May 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 369/2009 of 6 May 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 370/2009 of 6 May 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the single payment scheme provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 | 3 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Directive 2009/3/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 amending Council Directive 80/181/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to units of measurement (1) | 10 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EC) No 369/2009 of 6 May 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 370/2009 of 6 May 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the single payment scheme provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003

3

DIRECTIVES

*

Directive 2009/3/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 amending Council Directive 80/181/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to units of measurement (1)

10

| | | IV   Other acts |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | | EFTA Surveillance Authority |
| | * | EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 368/06/COL of 29 November 2006 on the sale of the Icelandic State’s shares in Sementsverksmiðjan hf. (Iceland) | 14 |

IV   Other acts

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EFTA Surveillance Authority

*

EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 368/06/COL of 29 November 2006 on the sale of the Icelandic State’s shares in Sementsverksmiðjan hf. (Iceland)

14

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.30a




February 1, 2000


Mr. Burton August Sr.
3221 S. Ocean Blvd.
Building 2, Apartment 808
Highland Beach, FL 33487


         Re:  MMB #27 - Troy, New York


Dear Burt,

Please be informed that Monro Muffler / Brake, Inc. is exercising it's option to
cancel the above referenced Lease per the November 1, 1993 Lease Amendment, a
copy of which is enclosed for your convenience.

In accordance with page 2 of the 1993 Lease Amendment, Monro Muffler will
continue to pay, without reimbursement, rent utilities, taxes, insurance and
other costs of occupancy through the earlier of July 31, 2000 or the day the
premises are released "Rent Expiration Date"). Following the "Rent Expiration
Date," Monro Muffler / Brake, Inc. will continue to pay rent, utilities, taxes,
insurance and other costs of occupancy subject to reimbursement by A, A, & L for
these out of pocket expenses. In addition, Monro Muffler / Brake, Inc. and A, A,
& L agreed to use "Best Joint Efforts" to Lease the vacated property to a third
party. At your request, we will place signage in the facility in an attempt to
effectuate a lease or sale of the property. I am not sure if Operations will
continually operate the business through July 31, 2000 or choose to close the
facility and transfer the Manager and Technicians to other shops. I will keep
you posted as to our intent in this regard as soon as that decision is made.

Please contact me with any questions or comments.

Very truly yours,



Thomas M. Aspenleiter
Vice President Real Estate


CC:  David Dworkin - via facsimile