alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 334/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 334 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4930 November 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 334

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4930 November 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1737/2006 of 7 November 2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning monitoring of forests and environmental interactions in the Community | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1737/2006 of 7 November 2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning monitoring of forests and environmental interactions in the Community

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
### uNITED sTATEs oFAMERICA 

# n 

# ECEf\ l DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIOrr"'l _::,,**~** 

### ,l OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

## FEB 062017 HEARING In the Matter of: Federal Express DocketNo. FAA-2015-3306 FAA CaseNo. 2015NM720020 Judge J.E. Sullivan

NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY

To: Judge Sullivan and Respondent through his attorney ofrecord herein: Notice is hereby given that counsel will be unavailable the following dates in 2017: Aprilll, 12, 17, 18; May 22 throughJune 8, inclusive; July 11 through July 21, inclusive; September 21, 22; October 5,6,12,13, inclusive; for the complainant inthe above-captioned case. It is respectfully requested that no hearings be scheduled during this period. David F. Shayne Attorney Enforcement Division, Western Team 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98057 Email: david.f.shayne@faa.gov Telephone: (425) 227-2007 (main) (425) 227-2165 (direct) (425) 227-1007 (fax) Please address all further correspondence regarding this matterto the above address.

DAVID F. SHAYNE FAA Attorney

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice ofUnavailability has been served this date, to the following:

Federal Aviation Administration Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbnr Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Fax 202-267-1293 (facsimile and Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested) Greg. G. Stofko Senior Attorney Regulatory Affairs 1700 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 950 Washington, DC 20006 Email: Greg.stofko@fedex.com (email and Certified Mail- Retnrn Receipt Requested)

Honorable J.E. Sullivan Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. East Bldg., Ground Floor, Room E11-310 Washington, D.C. 20590 Fax: 202-366-7536 (facsimile and Certified Mail- Retnrn Receipt Requested)

Dated: 

## FEB 02 2017

,·**-~rl** 7'\":::·:-------·7 c"'-;:>7

## /£ff,#~J

## <,~.--(>/) JeffKa 

# eg Legal Technician Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Enforcement Division- Western Team Renton, WA

DAVID F. SHAYNE, FAA ATTORNEY TEL: (425) 227-2165; FAX: (425) 227-1007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000797324
<NAME>                        LASERGATE SYSTEMS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                  634,507  
<SECURITIES>                                  0  
<RECEIVABLES>                           945,726  
<ALLOWANCES>                            159,624  
<INVENTORY>                             122,028  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1,628,015  
<PP&E>                                  326,894  
<DEPRECIATION>                          105,135  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        5,082,087  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 2,388,331  
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                 240
<COMMON>                                220,862
<OTHER-SE>                            2,332,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          5,082,087  
<SALES>                               1,278,576  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1,278,576  
<CGS>                                   853,299  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           999,720  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        (11,646) 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (562,797) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (562,797) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0  
<CHANGES>                                     0  
<NET-INCOME>                           (562,797) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (.08) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0  
                                     


</TABLE>
221213 ORD RE FEE EXAMINER FEE APP.DOCX VERSION DECEMBER 13, 2022 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

----------------------------------------------------------x

In re: PROMESA

Title III

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO (Jointly Administered)

et al.,

Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER CONCERNING RESPONSES TO THE TENTH INTERIM AND CONSOLIDATED 

SEMIANNUAL APPLICATION OF THE FEE EXAMINER AND GODFREY & KAHN, S.C.

The Court has received and reviewed the Tenth Interim and Consolidated 

Semiannual Application of the Fee Examiner and Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Counsel to the Fee 

Examiner, for Allowance of Compensation for Services Rendered and Reimbursement of 

Expenses for the Period from April 1, 2022 Through September 30, 2022 (Docket Entry No. 

22847 in Case No. 17-3283)2 (the “Application”) and the Supplemental Declaration of Katherine 

Stadler in Support of Tenth Interim and Consolidated Semiannual Application of the Fee 

Examiner and Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. (Docket Entry No. 23035) (the “Supplemental 

Declaration”).

Responses, if any, to the Application, as supplemented by the Supplemental 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “Commonwealth”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) 

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-

BK-3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways 

and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the 

Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-

BK-3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric 

Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits 

of Federal Tax ID: 3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (“PBA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK-5523-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) 

(Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations).

2 All docket entry references herein are to the docket of Case No. 17-3283. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23052 Filed:12/13/22 Entered:12/13/22 11:41:51 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
221213 ORD RE FEE EXAMINER FEE APP.DOCX VERSION DECEMBER 13, 2022 2

Declaration, must be filed by 5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time) on December 13, 2022.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 13, 2022

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN 

United States District Judge

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23052 Filed:12/13/22 Entered:12/13/22 11:41:51 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 369 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 369

To waive time limitations specified by law in order to allow the Medal 
 of Honor to be awarded to Gary Lee McKiddy, of Miamisburg, Ohio, for 
 acts of valor while a helicopter crew chief and door gunner with the 
              1st Cavalry Division during the Vietnam War.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2003

  Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To waive time limitations specified by law in order to allow the Medal 
 of Honor to be awarded to Gary Lee McKiddy, of Miamisburg, Ohio, for 
 acts of valor while a helicopter crew chief and door gunner with the 
              1st Cavalry Division during the Vietnam War.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO AWARD MEDAL OF HONOR TO GARY LEE MCKIDDY FOR 
              VALOR DURING THE VIETNAM WAR.

    (a) Waiver of Time Limitations.--Notwithstanding the time 
limitations in section 3744(b) of title 10, United States Code, or any 
other time limitation, the President is authorized and requested to 
award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to Gary Lee 
McKiddy, of Miamisburg, Ohio, for the acts of valor referred to in 
subsection (b).
    (b) Action Described.--The acts of valor referred to in subsection 
(a) are the conspicuous acts of gallantry and intrepidity at the risk 
of his life and beyond the call of duty of Gary Lee McKiddy, between 
October 25, 1969, and May 6, 1970, and particularly on May 6, 1970, the 
day he died during a combat operation in Cambodia while serving as a 
Specialist Four in the 1st Cavalry Division of the United States Army.
    (c) Posthumous Award.--The Medal of Honor may be awarded under this 
section posthumously as provided in section 3752 of title 10, United 
States Code.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 121.151 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes aircraft requirements for all certificate holders.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3548 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3548

To amend title 5, United States Code, to exclude civilian personnel at 
      naval shipyards from the national security personnel system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 2003

 Mr. Dicks (for himself and Mr. Inslee) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to exclude civilian personnel at 
      naval shipyards from the national security personnel system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF CIVILIAN PERSONNEL AT NAVAL SHIPYARDS FROM THE 
              NATIONAL SECURITY PERSONNEL SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--Section 9902(c) of title 5, United States Code, as 
added by section 1101 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2004, is amended by adding at the end of paragraph (2) the 
following new subparagraph:
                    ``(K) shipyards owned by the United States and 
                under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Such section 9902(c) is further 
amended--
            (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ``Defense 
        Laboratories.--'' and inserting ``Defense Laboratories and 
        Naval Shipyards.--'';
            (2) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by inserting ``or naval shipyards'' after 
                ``laboratory''; and
                    (B) by inserting after ``shall apply'' the 
                following: ``(A) to naval shipyards on or after October 
                1, 2008; and (B) to laboratories''; and
            (3) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by inserting ``and naval shipyards'' after 
                ``laboratories'';
                    (B) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph 
                (I); and
                    (C) by striking the period at the end of 
                subparagraph (J) and inserting ``; and''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4490

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DARYL F. LOCUST, a/k/a Derek Locust, a/k/a 8,

a/k/a Daryl Frank Locusts,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,

District Judge. (4:06-cr-00040-RBS)

Submitted: December 17, 2007 Decided: January 4, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James S. Ellenson, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck

Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Timothy R. Murphy, Special

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Daryl F. Locust was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute heroin, crack, and cocaine, 21

U.S.C. § 846 (2000); conspiracy to import heroin, 21 U.S.C. § 963

(2000); interstate travel in aid of racketeering, 18 U.S.C.

§ 1952(a)(3) (2000) (three counts); conspiracy to commit money

laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) (2000); money laundering, 18 U.S.C.

§ 1956(a)(1)(A)(i), (B)(i) (2000) (ten counts); distribution of

sixty-two grams of cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C)

(2000); using and carrying a firearm in furtherance of a drug

trafficking activity, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2000) (two counts); and

being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)

(2000). The district court sentenced Locust to two consecutive

life terms plus twenty-five years. He noted a timely appeal. 

Locust challenges only the sufficiency of the evidence to

support his conviction, arguing that the witnesses who testified

against him were not credible because they were all drug dealers

and/or convicted felons. A defendant challenging the sufficiency

of the evidence faces a heavy burden. United States v. Beidler,

110 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1997). A jury’s verdict must be

upheld on appeal if there is substantial evidence in the record to

support it. Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). In

determining whether the evidence in the record is substantial, we

view the evidence in the light most favorable to the government.
- 3 -

United States v. Burgos, 94 F.3d 849, 862 (4th Cir. 1996) (en

banc). 

Here, the government presented overwhelming and

uncontradicted evidence of Locust’s extensive drug dealing and

money laundering activities. Locust’s sole challenge to the

evidence is that the witnesses who testified against him were all

drug dealers, drug users, and/or convicted felons. However, it is

well settled that this court does not review witness credibility.

United States v. Saunders, 886 F.2d 56, 60 (4th Cir. 1989). 

Accordingly, we affirm Locust’s conviction. We deny

Locust’s motion to relieve his attorney and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 402I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 402I |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Rocznik 645 października 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 402I

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Rocznik 645 października 2021

---

| Spis treści | Strona |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacje |
| | INFORMACJE INSTYTUCJI, ORGANÓW I JEDNOSTEK ORGANIZACYJNYCH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ |
| | Trybunał Obrachunkowy |
| 2021/C 402 I/01 | Opinia nr 2/2021 w sprawie wniosku Komisji dotyczącego rozporządzenia Rady zmieniającego rozporządzenie (UE, Euratom) nr 609/2014 w celu zwiększenia przewidywalności dla państw członkowskich oraz uściślenia procedur rozstrzygania sporów przy udostępnianiu tradycyjnych zasobów własnych oraz zasobów własnych opartych na VAT i na DNB (COM(2021) 327 final z 25 czerwca 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE)) | 1 |

Spis treści

Strona

IV   Informacje

INFORMACJE INSTYTUCJI, ORGANÓW I JEDNOSTEK ORGANIZACYJNYCH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ

Trybunał Obrachunkowy

2021/C 402 I/01

Opinia nr 2/2021 w sprawie wniosku Komisji dotyczącego rozporządzenia Rady zmieniającego rozporządzenie (UE, Euratom) nr 609/2014 w celu zwiększenia przewidywalności dla państw członkowskich oraz uściślenia procedur rozstrzygania sporów przy udostępnianiu tradycyjnych zasobów własnych oraz zasobów własnych opartych na VAT i na DNB (COM(2021) 327 final z 25 czerwca 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE))

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

IV Informacje

INFORMACJE INSTYTUCJI, ORGANÓW I JEDNOSTEK ORGANIZACYJNYCH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ

Trybunał Obrachunkowy

| 5.10.2021 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CI 402/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2021

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CI 402/1

---

Opinia nr 2/2021

w sprawie wniosku Komisji dotyczącego rozporządzenia Rady zmieniającego rozporządzenie (UE, Euratom) nr 609/2014 w celu zwiększenia przewidywalności dla państw członkowskich oraz uściślenia procedur rozstrzygania sporów przy udostępnianiu tradycyjnych zasobów własnych oraz zasobów własnych opartych na VAT i na DNB (COM(2021) 327 final z 25 czerwca 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE))

(2021/C 402 I/01)

Europejski Trybunał Obrachunkowy zawiadamia o publikacji 5 października 2021 r. opinii nr 2/2021 w sprawie wniosku Komisji dotyczącego rozporządzenia Rady zmieniającego rozporządzenie (UE, Euratom) nr 609/2014 w celu zwiększenia przewidywalności dla państw członkowskich oraz uściślenia procedur rozstrzygania sporów przy udostępnianiu tradycyjnych zasobów własnych oraz zasobów własnych opartych na VAT i na DNB (COM(2021) 327 final z 25 czerwca 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE)).

Sprawozdanie to dostępne będzie od godz. 17.00 w dniu 5 października 2021 r. na stronie internetowej Europejskiego Trybunału Obrachunkowego:

https://www.eca.europa.eu/pl/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=59435

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Form 10-Kof Aksys, Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Laurence P. Birch, President, Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or Section 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

| Dated: April 28, 2006 | By:    | /s/ LAURENCE P. BIRCH              |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Laurence P.  Birch                 |
|                       |   | President,  Chief Executive Officer and |
|                       |   | Chief  Financial Officer                |

 

Thiscertification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided toAksys, Ltd. and will be retained by Aksys, Ltd. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24463-24464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10338]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-249-000]


Transwestern Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

April 20, 2000.
    Take notice that on April 14, 2000, Transwestern Pipeline Company 
(Transwestern) tendered for filing to become part of Transwestern's 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff 
sheets, proposed to become effective on May 15, 2000:

Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 48

[[Page 24464]]

Original Sheet No. 97
Sheet No. 98

    Transwestern states that the purpose of this filing is to provide 
that Transwestern may contract for natural gas transportation services 
on Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) in order to expand and 
enhance its own transportation service.
    Transwestern further states that copies of the filing have been 
mailed to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10338 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00002-CR

JECORI HOWARD, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 71st District Court

Harrison County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-0142X

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JeCori Howard, appellant, has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss his appeal. The 

motion was signed by Howard and by his counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 42.2, we 

grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: January 14, 2013

Date Decided: January 15, 2013

Do Not Publish