alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Section 302 Certifications                          Exhibit 31 (ii)

I, J. Robert Buchanan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc.

    2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

    3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15 (e) and 15d - 15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

        (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

        (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluations; and
         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 8, 2004

/s/ J. ROBERT BUCHANAN
--------------------------
J. Robert Buchanan
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2021109EN.01000101.xml

| 29.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

26 March 2021

(2021/C 109/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1782 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,34 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4361 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85503 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1905 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1090 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1258 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,081 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 363,58 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6493 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8878 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,4523 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5459 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4814 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1540 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6863 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5865 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 332,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,6845 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7063 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5740 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 986,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8854 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,132 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 89,5075 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,654 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,7110 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,2575 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,4845 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1782

JPY

Japanese yen

129,34

DKK

Danish krone

7,4361

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85503

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1905

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1090

ISK

Iceland króna

149,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1258

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,081

HUF

Hungarian forint

363,58

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6493

RON

Romanian leu

4,8878

TRY

Turkish lira

9,4523

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5459

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4814

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1540

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6863

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5865

KRW

South Korean won

1 332,17

ZAR

South African rand

17,6845

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7063

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5740

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 986,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8854

PHP

Philippine peso

57,132

RUB

Russian rouble

89,5075

THB

Thai baht

36,654

BRL

Brazilian real

6,7110

MXN

Mexican peso

24,2575

INR

Indian rupee

85,4845

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
HUSBAND AND WIFE.

[Hamilton Circuit Court,

July 25, 1896.]

Smith, Swing and Cox, JJ.

#### Heller v. Hohman.

Diabirity or a Married Woman eor Repairs on Her Property.

A wife is held to be personally liable for repairs to a building ou her land, made under contract with her husband, but with her knowledge and without any protest from her.

Heard on Error.

Smith J.

The plaintiff in error seeks the reversal of a judgment by the court of common pleas sustaining a demurrer to the amended petition filed by him against the defendant, and dismissing the action at his cost.

This question presented, clearly and explicitly raised, is this: Is a married woman, who is owner of a lot of land upon which is situated a barn or shed, personally liable for the reasonable value of work done by a carpenter in the repair of such buildings, at the special instance and request of the husband of the owner, when the carpenter supposing him to be the owner of the property does the work and receives from him part payment therefor, and takes his note tor the balance, which is still wholly unpaid, when the wife herself knew of the request so made, and being in *339possession of the property knew when the work was commenced, and was present and saw it as it progressed, and never advised him that she was the owner of the property, and made no objection by word or act to its. being done for her benefit or on her account, or that she did not intend to pay for it ? Is she liable for the balance due ?

*Smith & Kuhn,*for Plaintiff in Error.

*Edmund K. Stallo, Contra.*

Independently of any statutory provision, we incline strongly to the opinion that on this state of fact the wife would be liable for the balance due on the work. The facts alleged point very strongly to the conclusion that the husband was acting for the wife as her agent.

But if this be not so, we think that under the provisions of section 3192, Revised Statutes, the husband must be held in this matter to have been the agent of the wife, and that she became personally liable for the debt thus contracted. That section provides in substance that when a married woman is the owner of land on which, is situated a building like this, and has knowledge of its repair or improvement, when the same is done under a contract with her husband and without her express objection, the husband shall be deemed and held to be the duly authorized agent of the wife.

It is true that this section is one under the mechanics’ lien law, and would authorize a lien to be taken out on the property" of the wife under such circumstances. But in our judgment it is not limited to this. With the view of preventing fraud and injustice it goes further and makes her personally liable on the contract made by her husband for repairs on her property, if she knew the work was being done, and made no objection thereto. The husband by the terms of the statute is made the duly authorized agent of the wife *therein.*That is, as to the contract itself. It is a wholesome provision, and should be upheld by the courts. The judgment of the court of common pleas will be reversed with costs, and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
§ 120.205 Preemption of State and local laws. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, these regulations preempt any State or local law, rule, regulation, or order to the extent that: ( 1 ) Compliance with both the State or local requirement and this subpart is not possible; or
( 2 ) Compliance with the State or local requirement is an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of any requirement in this subpart.
( b ) The alcohol testing requirements of this title shall not be construed to preempt provisions of State criminal law that impose sanctions for reckless conduct leading to actual loss of life, injury, or damage to property, whether the provisions apply specifically to transportation employees or employers or to the general public.
§ 714.2 What are the permissible leasing arrangements? ( a ) You may engage in direct leasing. In direct leasing, you purchase personal property from a vendor, becoming the owner of the property at the request of your member, and then lease the property to that member.
( b ) You may engage in indirect leasing as described under § 701.21(c)(9) of this chapter. In indirect leasing, a third party leases property to your member and you then purchase that lease from the third party for the purpose of leasing the property to your member. You do not have to purchase the leased property if you comply with the requirements of § 714.3.
( c ) You may engage in open-end leasing. In an open-end lease, your member assumes the risk and responsibility for any difference in the estimated residual value and the actual value of the property at lease end.
( d ) You may engage in closed-end leasing. In a closed-end lease, you assume the risk and responsibility for any difference in the estimated residual value and the actual value of the property at lease end. However, your member is always responsible for any excess wear and tear and excess mileage charges as established under the lease.
[65 FR 34585, May 31, 2000, as amended at 88 FR 67601, Sept. 29, 2023]
AAM-11-183-E 

March 1, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10217 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0142 

Mr. Jerry L. Williams 

President 

Sonoran Wings Flight Training Centre, Inc. 

P.O. Box 24158 

Tucson, AZ 85734 

Dear Mr. Williams: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated February 17, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Sonoran Wings Flight Training Centre, Inc (SWFTC) for an exemption from 

part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow 

SWFTC to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program while operating 

under separate parts of the regulation. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent-setting petition, and any delay in acting 

on this petition would be detrimental to SWFTC. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one 

would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 
2 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant [Full Company Name] an exemption from 14 CFR part 

120 to the extent necessary to allow SWFTC to cover its safety-sensitive employees under 

one testing program while operating under separate parts of the regulation, subject to the 

conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Sonoran Wings Flight Training Centre, Inc. are subject to the drug 

and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or 

part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Sonoran Wings Flight Training Centre, Inc. part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on March 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraiser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
#### § 9.100 Acting as indenture trustee and creditor.

With respect to a debt securities issuance, a national bank may act both as indenture trustee and as creditor until 90 days after default, if the bank maintains adequate controls to manage the potential conflicts of interest.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1080 PLATE 1

R.23 E. 82°00" R.24 E. R25 E.
x.
33
s.
STATE 62
.
34
s.
am
30
27°
Lain 30
T.
35
s.
N
N
T.
36
Ss.
27° i
20° ry
\ a7
\ |20/
. s EXPLANATION
\ CS
Sr 9 >, \ I-53,
< i 2
26 \ \\ Brownville z
\ x River sediments %
325 Phosphatic sand and gravel =
\
7: 6: <
753) fed
8 z
7 § s
37 yo" 3 —e 3S
. 3 Pres plain or deltaic deposits
Stratified sand and clayey sand; heavy dot
.: ~~ aah 5, "pattern represents fresh-water lake deposits,
" TS limestone and calcareous clayey sand
74-53) 89-5: > SS
4 : Logg tt
\ 5. GOLELCE:
SN 8
\N readia = Caloosahatchee marl
. Sand and clayey sand; contains lar,
* a ie ‘marine fauna ve
‘67-53 an g
6283 Hy
2 se TS z
. me : &3 6 <
" a S ray to green sand and clayey sand &
yy eS S} =] Undiferentiated phosphatic | Contains abundant marine invertebrates, minor u
§ dl
SQ Peeeieee| 3) Pamete aaduleg sand, and me
2791 x) S53 \2 'y. Includes Bone 3
10° 14 SSS EE and residuum of "3 § Th
lawthorn formation 58 on
8 Ry ENF es de
$s stacccsseccsegey ® i Hawthorn formation
SB ooo eoee Ss Phosphatic sandy limestone; contains
1 Z. LOL LL LE iy molds and casts of marine invertebrates
E222
: \ Les
Ss LLOLLLL
CELE ECE. ———__ + - ~~~
SSS Contact, dashed where approximately located
LELLE
SCE
D Wee .
K \ NG ee % LLL LLP LE P
Sy LP Ls Zs Leegeeses Outerops, pits, or exposures
\ SESS ERS: LELELEEE,
OL OG GLE ENE OEE .
Sm LOL LECLLLLE AE. SSS Drill hole
LELELELELL EL COCO e ee
CLELEELLELEL LZ SOLES
OCGECLEEECOELE do 0005)
Ft. CLLELLLLIAL LLL be SWISS AS —
T, \ SLALLELELLLLL LL SOLED. Baved:
39 en, EELEPPPPLEEEEL EL Ger SGN road
LLL LELELALALLL ELL \ .
7 EPPS LLELLLLPELL LLL % %
LLL LLLLLCLEP ALLEL Ee Sh OE.
CPECELELELLECEELEL ELE SSN5 ‘
A en Dirt road
MORES IELs . Graded or wnoraded
LOGO CLEP LOCO LEO LELELELEA SASS S
LOOP LOLPL OLLI LEE LEECESI ELLE :
LOLITA LL ET OEE PEL ELEEEAEEL EE, cr
OL Le a
CLUE Eee GA Creek ond ond
oa
LLL,
LESBOS EGO “
82°00" LE
81°50 i
B14” INTERIOR—GEOLOGIGAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON, DS

GEOLOGIC MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF OUTCROPS AND DRILL HOLES IN PARTS OF HARDEE

0
ra

DE SOTO COUNTIES, FLORIDA

L

10 Miles

AND
Responses to first and third detailed OMB questions 

 Bill Maxwell 

 to: Cortney_Higgins 

 03/14/2011 04:51 PM 

 

Cortney -- 

Here are the responses to the first and third set of detailed OMB 

questions. 

Thank you. 

Summary of Interagency Working Comments on draft EGU MACT under EO 12866 Interagency Review_ 03 

10 2011_Response_031411.doc 

 Summary of Interagency Working Comments on draft EGU MACT under EO 12866 Interagency Review_ 

03 04 _Response_031411.doc 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2



                     MODERN MEDICAL MODALITIES CORPORATION
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Modern Medical Modalities Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Minesh Patel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Minesh Patel
------------------------------------------
Minesh Patel
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
May 17, 2004
Brenton Mortgages, Inc.
2805 Beaver Avenue, P.O. Box 133
Des Moines, Iowa 50310-0379
(515) 237-5412 Fax: (515) 237-5477
(800) 562-1247

(LOGO)

Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
1 I000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:.

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1998 fiscal year:

(A) I have reviewed the  activities and  performance of the Servicer  during the
preceding  fiscal  year  under  the  terms  of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer Guide and to
the best of these  Officers'  knowledge,  the Servicer has  fulfilled all of its
duties,  responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements  throughout such
year,  or if there has been a default or failure of the  servicer to perform any
of such duties,  responsibilities or obligations,  a description of each default
or failure and the nature and status  thereof has been  reported to Norwest Bank
Minnesota, N.A.;

(B) I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
servicer in good standing;

(C) I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions  Insurance
Policy and any other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing  Agreement,
Trust Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer  Guide
are in full force and effect;

(D) All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy (if
applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable),  with respect
to each Mortgaged Property,  have been paid and that all such insurance policies
are in full force and effect;

(E) All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any other  expenses
accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance  on any
Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid,  or if any such costs or expenses have not
been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the reason for the non-payment
has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G) All annual reports of  Foreclosures  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property
required  per  section  6050H,  6050J and  6050P of the  Internal  Revenue  Code
respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:

Officer John W. Maier

Vice President
Title

3/24/99
Date
(LOGO)
Brian R. Leahy

Director

Department of Pesticide Regulation

Edmund G. Brown Jr.

Governor

1001 I Street • P.O. Box 4015 • Sacramento, California 95812-4015 • www.cdpr.ca.gov

A Department of the California Environmental Protection Agency

 Printed on recycled paper, 100% post-consumer--processed chlorine-free.

March 29, 2012 

TO: Interested Parties

SUBJECT: ANNUAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS INVENTORY 

REPORT: EMISSIONS FOR 1990-2010 

As required under Title 3, California Code of Regulations (3 CCR), section 6452.4, the Department of 

Pesticide Regulation has completed the annual volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions inventory 

report that includes the following information: 

• total agricultural and structural pesticide VOC emissions for the previous years 

• evaluation of compliance with benchmarks specified in 3 CCR section 6452.2 

• fumigant emission limits for the upcoming year if necessary, according to 3 CCR section 6452.2 

• an emission rating (or application method adjustment factor, the percentage of fumigant 

applied emitted to air) for each fumigation method

This report contains information based on 1990–2010 pesticide use data for five ozone 

nonattainment areas (NAAs) in California. The pesticide VOC emissions are compared to the 

goals described in the ozone state implementation plan (SIP). These “SIP goals” are a 20 percent 

reduction from 1990 for the Sacramento Metro, Southeast Desert, and South Coast NAAs; a 

12 percent reduction from 1990 for the San Joaquin Valley NAA; and a phase-in of the 

reductions for the Ventura NAA, with a final reduction for Ventura of 20 percent from 

1990 by 2012. These goals are the same as the VOC regulation benchmarks specified in 3 CCR 

section 6452.2. 

The 2010 pesticide VOC emissions for all five NAAs complied with the SIP goals and VOC 

regulation benchmarks, ranging from 18 to 84 percent less than emissions in the 1990 base year. 

Relative to 2009, pesticide VOC emissions in 2010 increased by 12 to 60 percent, depending on 

the NAA. 

Consistent with the regulations, the Department of Pesticide Regulation has established a 

fumigant limit for the Ventura NAA. Based on the emission data for 2010, the fumigant limit for 

May 1–October 31, 2012 is 942,000 pounds (2.56 average tons/day) of emissions. As specified 

by 3 CCR section 6452.3, the Ventura county agricultural commissioner has several options to 

enforce the fumigant limit.
Interested Parties 

March 29, 2012 

Page 2 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Mr. Randy Segawa, Environmental 

Program Manager, at 916-324-4137. 

Sincerely,

Original Signed by 

Charles M. Andrews 

Associate Director

916-445-3984