alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Trans World Entertainment Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending October 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Robert J.
Higgins, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John J.
Sullivan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                      |  |                              
|------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Higgins                 |  | /s/ John J. Sullivan         
|                                      |  |                              
|Robert J. Higgins                     |  | John J. Sullivan             
|Chairman and Chief
 Executive Officer |  | Executive Vice President
 and
|                                      |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|December 9,
 2010                     |  | December 9,
 2010            

---
# Official Journal C 111I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 111I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 633 April 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 111I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 633 April 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 111 I/01 | Communication from the Commission Guidelines on EU Emergency Assistance on Cross-Border Cooperation in Healthcare related to the COVID-19 crisis | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 111 I/01

Communication from the Commission Guidelines on EU Emergency Assistance on Cross-Border Cooperation in Healthcare related to the COVID-19 crisis

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 35.10 Transition provisions. ( a ) *Disclosure of covered agreements entered into before the effective date of this part.* The following disclosure requirements apply to covered agreements that were entered into after November 12, 1999, and that terminated before April 1, 2001. ( 1 ) *Disclosure to the public.* Each NGEP and each insured depository institution or affiliate that was a party to the agreement must make the agreement available to the public under § 35.6 until at least April 1, 2002.
( 2 ) *Disclosure to the relevant supervisory agency.* ( i ) Each NGEP that was a party to the agreement must make the agreement available to the relevant supervisory agency under § 35.6 until at least April 1, 2002.
( ii ) Each insured depository institution or affiliate that was a party to the agreement must, by June 30, 2001, provide each relevant supervisory agency either— ( A ) A copy of the agreement under § 35.6(d)(1)(i); or
( B ) The information described in § 35.6(d)(1)(ii) for each agreement.
( b ) *Filing of annual reports that relate to fiscal years ending on or before December 31, 2000.* In the event that a NGEP, insured depository institution or affiliate has any information to report under § 35.7 for a fiscal year that ends on or before December 31, 2000, and that concerns a covered agreement entered into between May 12, 2000, and December 31, 2000, the annual report for that fiscal year must be provided no later than June 30, 2001, to— ( 1 ) Each relevant supervisory agency; or
( 2 ) In the case of a NGEP, to an insured depository institution or affiliate that is a party to the agreement in accordance with § 35.7(f)(2).
**Exhibit        32**

**Certification        Pursuant to**

**18        U.S.C. Section 1350**

| (1)   | The                  report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                                         |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)   | The                  information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  registrant.  |

| April                  26, 2006                                            |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                       |   |
|                                                                       |   |
| /s/                  Jeffrey R. Immelt                                     |   |
| Jeffrey                  R. ImmeltChief                  Executive Officer |   |
|                                                             |   |
| /s/                  Keith S. Sherin                                       |   |
| Keith                  S. SherinChief                  Financial Officer   |   |
#### Choctawhatchie H’dwood L. Co. *v.*Adams.

*Assumpsit.*

(Decided June 11, 1914.

65 South. 678.)

*Attachment; Default Judgment; Oomplamt.*— Before a default judgment can be rendered in an attachment proceeding it is necessary that plaintiff file a complaint as required by section 2961, Code of 1907.

Appeal from Geneva Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce.

Assumpsit by J. E. Adams against the Choctawhatchie Hardwood Lumber Company, begun by attachment which was levied October 23, 1912, upon certain property therein described. On the same day the defendant in attachment executed bond for the forthcoming of the property levied on and it was released to him. On April 2, 1913, judgment by default was rendered and the property adjudged subject to the writ from which judgment the defendant appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

C. D. Carmichael, for appellant.

The court improperly rendered judgment by default in the absence of a complaint filed by the plaintiff. — Section 2961, Code 1907; *Penn v.*Edwards, 42 Ala. 605; *Hay good v. Tait,*126 Ala. 264.

W. O. Mulkey, for appellee.

No brief reached the Reporter.

PELHAM, J.

The default judgment rendered against the appellant as defendant in the attachment proceedings was unauthorized, in that the statute in *614such cases made and provided requires the plaintiff to file a complaint. — Code 1907, § 2961. The judgment is shown to have been rendered without a complaint having been filed. This constitutes reversible *error.*— Penn *v. Edwards,*42 Ala. 655. See, also, *Haygood v. Tait,*126 Ala. 264, 27 South. 842, and authorities there cited.

Reversed and remanded.
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.803 Subpoenas. ( a ) *Issuance.* In the course of a formal investigative proceeding the officer conducting the investigation may issue a subpoena directing the party named therein to appear before the officer conducting the investigation at a specified time and place to testify or to produce documentary evidence, or both, relating to any matter under investigation.
( b ) *Service.* Service of subpoenas shall be effected in the following manner: ( 1 ) *Service upon a natural party.* Delivery of a copy of a subpoena to a natural person may be effected by— ( i ) Handing it to the person;
( ii ) Leaving it at his or her office with the person in charge thereof or, if there is no one in charge, by leaving it at a conspicuous place there;
( iii ) Leaving it at his or her dwelling place or usual place of abode with some person of suitable age and discretion who is found there; or
( iv ) Mailing it by registered or certified mail to him or her at his or her last known address. In the event that personal service as described in this paragraph is impracticable, any other method whereby actual notice is given to the respondent may be employed.
( 2 ) *Service upon other persons.* When the person to be served is not a natural person, delivery of a copy of the subpoena may be effected by— ( i ) Handing it to a registered agent for service, or to any officer, director, or agent in charge of any office of such person;
( ii ) Mailing it by registered or certified mail to any such representative at his or her last known address; or
( iii ) Any other method whereby actual notice is given to any such representative.
( c ) *Witness fees and mileage.* Witnesses appearing pursuant to subpoena shall be paid the same fees and mileage that are paid to witnesses in the United States district courts. Any such fees and mileage payments need be paid only upon submission of a properly completed application for reimbursement and in no event need they be paid sooner than 30 days after the appearance of the witness pursuant to subpoena.
( d ) *Enforcement.* Whenever it appears to the General Counsel that any person upon whom a subpoena was properly served pursuant to these Rules is refusing to fully comply with the terms of that subpoena, then the General Counsel, in his or her discretion, may apply to the courts of the United States for enforcement of such subpoena.
[56 FR 37767, Aug. 8, 1991; 57 FR 523, Jan. 7, 1992; June 18, 2010]
#### H. C. Groves, Plaintiff in Error, v. Henry M. Day, Defendant in Error.

Writ of error to a judgment of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County.

H. P. Bailey, for Plaintiff in Error.

Dickenson & Dickenson, for Defendant in Error.

Writ of error dismissed on motion of counsel for defendant in error, on March 11th, 1913.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1030 PLATE 32

TRUE NORTH

82 i2-122 ig_ayg

i3-141,123

Fossiliferous
limestone

Fossiliferous
limestone
EXPLANATION

Arkosie pebble conglomerate

Arkosie sandstone

co

Red shale and siltstone,
‘unt ted

Sangre de Cristo formation

PENNSYLVANIAN AND PERMIAN(?)

CARBONIFEROUS

Lithologic contact, dashed where inferred,
itted where concealed

Fault, approximately located,
showing relative movement

5
Strike and dip of beds

Quterop of copper minerals
or radioactive materials

i2-122

Prospect trench
Location number-sample numbers

i6-127
82-28

Old open pit*

Location number-sample numbers.
Sample numbers in italic from
Zeller and Belts, 1954

INTERIOR—GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON, 0, ©. MR 5340 Geology by C. M, Tschanz and D.C. Laub, 1983

GEOLOGIC MAP OF AREA I SHOWING COPPER DEPOSITS, COYOTE DISTRICT, MORA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO

= 9 i 1 90 Feet
§ 655.15 Interim reports, notices, and proxy statements. ( a ) The Corporation must provide to us an electronic copy of every interim report, notice, and proxy statement filed with the SEC within 1 business day of filing the item with the SEC, including all papers and documents that are a part of the report, notice, or statement. If it is impossible to provide an electronic copy, a paper copy must be submitted within the required time frame and an electronic copy as soon as possible after that.
( b ) The Corporation must publish a copy of each interim report, notice, and proxy statement on its Web site within 5 business days of filing the document(s) with the SEC. The Corporation may omit from these postings confidential, non-public information contained in the interim report, notice, or proxy statement. The interim report, notice, or proxy statement must remain on the Web site for 6 months or until the next annual report of condition is posted, whichever is later. Electronic links to the SEC filings Web site may be used in satisfaction of this requirement.
[81 FR 49155, July 27, 2016, as amended at 86 FR 27798, May 24, 2021]
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 0004 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 -NM - 1 43 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### 2013 - 0149 **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10447]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Public Information Collections Approved by Office of Management 
and Budget

April 18, 2000.
    The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has received Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approval for the following public 
information collections pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995, Public Law 96-511. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a 
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control 
number. Not withstanding any other provisions of law, no person shall 
be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of 
information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not 
display a valid control number. Questions concerning the OMB control 
numbers and expiration dates should be directed to Judy Boley, Federal 
Communications Commission, (202) 418-0214.

Federal Communications Commission

    OMB Control No.: 3060-0910.
    Expiration Date: 03/31/2003.
    Title: Third Report and Order in CC Docket No. 94-102, Revision of 
the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 
Emergency Calling Systems.
    Form No.: N/A.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 8,000 Burden Hours Annually, 1 hour per 
response; 8,000 responses.
    Description: The information required to be reported to the 
Commission by wireless carriers will provide PSAPs, providers of 
location technology, investors, manufacturers, local exchange carriers, 
and the Commission with valuable information necessary for preparing 
for full Phase II E911 implementation. The advance reports will provide 
helpful, if not essential, information for coordinating carrier plans 
with those of manufacturers and PSAPs. Also, they will assist the 
Commission's efforts to monitor Phase II developments and to take 
necessary actions to maintain the Phase II implementation schedule.
    OMB Control No.: 3060-0732.
    Expiration Date: 04/30/2003.
    Title: Consumer Education Concerning Wireless 911.
    Form No.: N/A.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 1,563 Burden Hours Annually, 30 minutes to 
1 hour per response; 2,500 responses.
    Description: The information collected will be used by consumers to 
determine rationally and accurately the scope of their options in 
accessing 911 services from mobile sets.

    Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10447 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
#### SELLS *v.*SELLS.

No. 8651.

July 14, 1932.

*113*Howdl, Heyman & Bolding,*for plaintiff.

*O. G. Hancock,*for defendant.

Beck, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Under our statutes and numerous decisions by this court, the ruling made in the headnote is required. This is demonstrated by a brief summary of the several suits brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error and the adjudications in those suits. A total divorce between the parties was granted June 25, 1926, and a decree *114awarding custody of tide minor child, a daughter, to the mother, the defendant in error here, except for five hours on each Sunday, when the father should have possession of the child. Following this decree there have been the following proceedings: January 6, 1931, petition by plaintiff in error seeking custody of the child. A demurrer to this petition was sustained and the suit dismissed January 29, 1931. February 27, 1931, petition to set aside the judgment of January 29th, and to allow petitioner, the plaintiff in error here, to dismiss his petition of January 6th, and praying that he have custody of the child for at least half the time. The court vacated the judgment of January 29th, but sustained a demurrer to the petition of February 27, 1931. On exceptions filed by plaintiff in error, this judgment was affirmed by this court, in the ease of *Sells*v. *Sells,*172 *Ga.*911 (159 S. E. 237). Then was filed the present petition for the writ of habeas corpus and for the exclusive custody of the minor child. To this a plea of res adjudicata was filed, and the same was sustained on September 1, 1931. See Civil Code, §§ 4335, 4336, 4338; *Hill v. Cox,*151 *Ga.*599, 604 (107 S. E. 850); *Richards*v. *McHan,*139 *Ga.*37, 39 (76 S. E. 32); *DeLoach*v. *Georgia Coast & Piedmont R. Co.,*144 *Ga.*678 (87 S. E. 889). In *Sells*v. *Sells,*supra, which was a suit between the same parties to recover the custody of the same child, it was said: “Inasmuch as the petition failed to allege that the mother of the child, to wdiom its custody was given in the original decree, was in any way unable or unsuited to retain custody, or that the conditions and circumstances were in any way changed, the court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition.” In the present case there was an allegation that the mother of the child, to wdiom its custody was given in the original decree, was unsuited to retain that custody, but it is not shown that the conditions and circumstances set out in the former petition were in any material way changed. Even if the matter in issue is not strictly res adjudicata, the plaintiff is estopped by the judgment formerly rendered, the controlling issue in the present case having been formerly adjudicated against him.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Russell, C, J., who dissents.*
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 78 (Friday, April 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10006]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institution of Standards and Technology


Announcing a Meeting of the National Conference on Weights and 
Measures

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The 85th Annual Meeting of the National Conference on Weights 
and Measures will be held July 16 through July 20, 2000, at the Omni 
Richmond Hotel, 100 South Street, Richmond, VA. The meeting is open to 
the public. The National Conference on Weights and Measures is an 
organization of weights and measures enforcement officials of the 
states, counties, and cities of the United States, other government 
officials and representatives of business, industry, trade 
associations, and consumer organizations. Conference members meet twice 
a year to develop weights and measures laws and to discuss subjects 
that relate to the field of weights and measures technology and 
administration. Pursuant to (15 U.S.C. 272(B)(6)), the National 
Institute of Standards and Technology acts as a sponsor of the National 
Conference on Weights and Measures in order to promote uniformity among 
the states in the complex of laws, regulations, methods, and testing 
equipment that comprises regulatory control by the states of commercial 
weighing and measuring devices and practices.

DATES: The meeting will be held July 16-July 20, 2000, 8:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: Omni Richmond Hotel located at 100 South Street, Richmond, 
VA 23219.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Henry V. Oppermann, Chief, NIST, 
Office of Weights and Measures, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 2350, 
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-2350. Telephone (301) 975-4005, or E-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2ddc5dff2dcdbc1c69cd5ddc4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3dcc4def3dddac0c79dd4dcc5">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 17, 2000.
Karen H. Brown,
Deputy Director, NIST.
[FR Doc. 00-10006 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>