alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
42652.

#### SMILEY v. GASKIN.

*Jordan and Pannell, JJ., concur.*

Argued February 7, 1967

Decided April 10, 1967.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

In this contest of the September, 1966, Democratic primary election for the office of county commissioner, the trial court on November 5, 1966, ordered that “The Ordinary of Liberty County, Georgia, and all other persons and election officials performing under her are hereby enjoined and restrained from counting any votes, regardless for whom cast, for the office of Commissioner of Roads and Revenue for the Third Road District of Liberty County, Georgia, in the General Election to be held November 8, 1966.” On December 14, 1966, the court declared the primary invalid. On January 16, 1967, the court ordered the Ordinary of Liberty County to call a special election for the office in question. Error is enumerated on the latter ruling of the court. *Held:*

This being a contest of a primary election, the trial court’s jurisdiction was limited strictly to the primary. The court was not authorized under *Code Ann.*§ 34-1708 (d) to interfere with the holding of the general election and to order the ordinary to call a special election at a later date. The date set by law for the general election was November 8, 1966. Georgia Constitution, Art. Ill, Sec. IY, Par. II *(Code Ann.*§ 2-1602); *Code Ann.*§ 34-802. ■ “An election is absolutely void when not held at the proper time and place by persons qualified to hold it. . . In the very nature of things, a court lacks jurisdiction to authorize or compel the holding of a void election. . .” *Davis v. Page, 217*Ga. 751, 752 (125 SE2d 60). See *Walker v. Sanford,*78 Ga. 165, 167 (1 SE 424); *Bergman v. Dutton,*203 Ga. 672, 681 (48 SE2d 101); *Mangum v. Dorn, 217*Ga. 66 (121 SE2d 145); 29 CJS 172-176, Elections, §§ 76-77. The assumption of jurisdiction over the general election was erroneous. Having no jurisdiction over the general election, all orders entered by the superior court regarding the general election are void. Accordingly, the ordinary and other election officials should proceed to perform their mandatory duties with respect to the November election. Since this court has no jurisdiction over the November election we cannot consider whether there was a failure of the election process for the office in question.

*Judgment reversed.*

*548
      *Jones & Kemp, Charles M. Jones, John W. Underwood,*for appellant.

*Sam Johnson,*for appellee.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, 

et al.1

Debtors.

PROMESA 

Title III

 Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

 (Jointly Administered)

MANPOWERGROUP, INC.’S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROOF OF CLAIM #180110

ManpowerGroup Inc., by its counsel Kohner, Mann & Kailas, S.C., pursuant to Fed. R. 

Bankr. P. 3006, hereby withdraws its Administrative Proof of Claim filed June 13, 2022, listed 

on the claim register as Claim #180110 in the amount of $9,308,383.05, as the claim has been 

paid.

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number 

and the last

four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283- LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales 

Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747). (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24227 Filed:05/18/23 Entered:05/18/23 12:04:51 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

No objection to Claim #180110 has been filed. Adversary Proceeding 19-00088 against 

Manpower was filed before the claim, but this adversary proceeding has been dismissed. 

This Notice of Withdrawal does not apply to or affect any other claim filed by or on 

behalf of ManpowerGroup, Inc. and all such other claims are reserved and preserved.

Dated: May 18, 2023

By: /s/ Samuel C. Wisotzkey

Ryan M. Billings (pro hac vice)

Wis. Bar No. 1084543

Samuel C. Wisotzkey (pro hac vice)

Wis. Bar No. 1029537

KOHNER, MANN & KAILAS, S.C.

Attorneys for ManpowerGroup, Inc. 

Washington Building, Barnabas Business Center

4650 North Port Washington Rd.

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212

Telephone: 414-962-5110

Facsimile: 414-962-8725

rbillings@kmksc.com

swisotzkey@kmksc.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this same date the foregoing motion was filed with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of 

Puerto Rico for Case No. 17 BK 3283, which will send notification of such filing to all attorneys 

of record on May 18, 2023.

By: /s/ Samuel C. Wisotzkey

Samuel C. Wisotzkey (pro hac vice)

Wis. Bar No. 1029537

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24227 Filed:05/18/23 Entered:05/18/23 12:04:51 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-123474) pertaining to the Icagen, Inc. 1996Amended Equity Compensation Plan and the Icagen, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated January 31, 2005 (except for paragraph 2 of Note 1, as to which the date is March 9, 2005, paragraph 13 of Note 6, as to which the date is February8, 2005, and Note 13, as to which the date is March 9, 2005), with respect to the financial statements of Icagen, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Raleigh, North Carolina 

March 24, 2005
# Official Journal L 84/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 84 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5931 March 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 84

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5931 March 2016

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’) (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Schedule A

Actions to be Transferred to the Avoidance Actions Trust

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23630-1 Filed:02/26/23 Entered:02/26/23 23:59:57 Desc:

Schedule A Page 1 of 2
2

Actions to be Transferred to the Avoidance Actions Trust1

VENDOR NAME ADVERSARY PROCEEDING NO.

Core Laboratories N.V. d/b/a Saybolt 19-381

Puerto Nuevo Security Guards, Inc. 19-384

 1 The actions to be transferred to the Avoidance Actions Trust include, but are not limited to, the actions listed on 

this Exhibit.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23630-1 Filed:02/26/23 Entered:02/26/23 23:59:57 Desc:

Schedule A Page 2 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24257 Filed:05/15/23 Entered:05/19/23 09:57:40 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24257 Filed:05/15/23 Entered:05/19/23 09:57:40 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24257 Filed:05/15/23 Entered:05/19/23 09:57:40 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24257 Filed:05/15/23 Entered:05/19/23 09:57:40 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24257 Filed:05/15/23 Entered:05/19/23 09:57:40 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24257 Filed:05/15/23 Entered:05/19/23 09:57:40 Desc: Main

Document Page 6 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24257 Filed:05/15/23 Entered:05/19/23 09:57:40 Desc: Main

Document Page 7 of 7
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas K. Emery, in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer for Internet
Services Corporation, which provides financial management services to
Yager/Kuester Public Fund Limited Partnership, have reviewed the internal
accounting records of Yager/Kuester Public Fund Limited Partnership on behalf of
the general partner, and certify that (i) the Form 10-Q Report of Yager/Kuester
Public Fund Limited Partnership for the quarter ending June 30, 2002 to which
this certification is attached fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in such Form 10-Q report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Yager/Kuester Public Fund
Limited Partnership.




Date   08/14/02                      By:  /s/ Thomas K. Emery
     ------------                       -------------------------
                                              Thomas K. Emery




                                       10
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00293-CR

PATRICK EDWARD WINCHESTER,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 43rd District 

Court

of Parker County (CR18-0500)

December 10, 2020

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Dauphinot

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot____________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of A. C.R ., a child, * From the 220 th District Court

of Comanche County,

Trial Court No. DV17119

.

No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 358

- C V * June 8 , 20 2 3

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey

, C. J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that th ere is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the

order of the tr ia l court is in all things affirmed.
#### SCOLES *v.*WRIGHT AND COLEMAN.

Goods sold — money paid — appeal—costs on appeal.

Where goods were sold to the defendants, and by their procurement charged to the plaintiff, who was sued by the vendee and compelled to pay for them, he may recover the money back in a suit for money paid.

Where a defendant appeals to the Supreme Court, and the plaintiff recovers in the Appellate Court, the same or a greater sum, he recovers full costs in both courts, whether he had judgment in the court below for costs or not.

Assumpsit for money paid, &c. Plea. Non assumpsit. On trial it was proven that Forsyth and Dobbin, of Wheeling, sold goods to the defendants and charged them, but never delivered the goods; afterwards the defendants procured F. & D. to charge them to the *93plaintiff, upon which they sued the plaintiff in Wheeling, Virginia, and recovered. To recover back the money so paid on said judgment, this suit is brought.

*S. W.*Culbertson, for the defendant,

upon this state of facts, contended that the plaintiff could not recover.

*James,*for the plaintiff,

moved for judgment and full costs, and cited 29 O, *L.*79.

By the Court.

The proof shows the payment of money by the plaintiff upon the procurement of the defendants, and without some evidence on their part to explain or show why this was done, he has a right to recover.

No such evidence being offered, a verdict was found for the plaintiff for sixty-three dollars.

By the Court. This case was brought up by appeal from the Court of Common Pleas by the defendants, and the recovery here is for a greater sum than was recovered in the court below. The 111th section of the practice act, 29 *O. L.*78, provides that when a case is appealed by the defendant, and the plaintiff shall recover the same or a larger sum than was recovered in the Court of Common Pleas, then the Supreme Court shall render judgment for the sum so recovered, with costs. That there was no judgment in the lower court for costs, does not affect the question. We are required to render judgment in this class of cases for the whole costs, including those expended in both courts.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, William J. McEntee, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) (Intentionally omitted)

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:

a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ WILLIAM J. MCENTEE, JR.                      
|                      |  | William J. McEntee, Jr.                          
|                      |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
§ 1206.603 Notice of intent to disclose. ( a ) The Agency shall carefully consider any objections of the submitter in the course of determining whether to disclose commercial information. The Agency, not the submitter, is responsible for deciding whether the information will be released or withheld.
( b ) Whenever the Agency decides to disclose commercial information over the objection of a submitter, the Agency shall forward to the submitter a written statement which shall include the following: ( 1 ) A brief explanation as to why the Agency did not agree with any objections;
( 2 ) A description of the commercial information to be disclosed, sufficient to identify information to the submitter; and
( 3 ) A date after which disclosure is expected, which shall be no less than 10 working days from the date of the letter providing notification to the submitter by the FOIA Office (§ 1206.601).
( c ) The FOIA office will provide notification regarding a FOIA lawsuit: ( 1 ) To a submitter, when a requester brings suit seeking to compel disclosure of commercial information; or
( 2 ) To a requester, when a submitter brings suit against the Agency in order to prevent disclosure of commercial information.
No. 76-919.

#### Fort Belknap Indian Community, Fort Belknap Indian Reservation *v.*District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District of Montana, in and for the County of Blaine, et al.

Sup. Ct. Mont. Motion of National Congress of American Indians, Inc., for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*granted. Motion of respondent James W. Gardipee, real party in interest, for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                           Section 1350 Certification
                           --------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") of PREMIER
EXHIBITIONS, INC. (the "Company") for the quarter ended August 31, 2005, Arnie
Geller, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, that:



     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: October 5, 2005                       /s/ Arnie Geller
                                             ----------------
                                             Arnie Geller
                                             President, Chief Executive Officer
                                             and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that effective immediately the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will consider all Quarterly Transaction Reports submitted by electric utilities with market-based rate authority to be informational in nature. This determination will result in the following listed modifications to the processing of these filings.

The Secretary will no longer issue a public notice of Quarterly Transaction Reports. The reports will continue to be available to the public through the Commission's Records Information System (RIMS). To permit logical and easy access to the filings in RIMS, rather than being assigned new docket numbers, these items will be assigned the same docket number as the underlying proceeding in which the Commission granted the market-based rate authority. To insure the proper identification by docket number of each filing, the filing party must prominently identify on the filing the docket number in which the Commission granted the market-based rate authority.

This notice is issued for the information and aid of all interested jurisdictional companies, the public and practitioners before the Commission as an explanation of the modified handling procedures for Quarterly Transaction Reports submitted by electric utilities with market-based rate authority. For further information, contact John Buckley at (202) 208-0275.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10110  Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 671-01-M
Locatable Minerals

Alternative B

Map 59

Harlowton Roundup

T7N

 ̈¦§

Pompeys

 Pillar

T Big Timber 1N

Billings

§ ̈¦

T2 Columbus S  ̈¦§

Bridger

T8S

R18E R29E Montana

R103W R93W

T Wyoming

57N

Locatable Withdrawals are processed by Lands

and Realty; as a result Locatable Withdrawals section

is identical to the Lands and Realty Withdrawals section.

0 2 4 8 12 16 20

Miles

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Legend

Map scale 1:900,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Locatable Minerals Closed

Locatable Minerals Open

Interstate

Highway

^ Towns

Public Lands Survey System

94

90

90