alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3528

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize the use 

of funds made available for nonpoint source management programs for 

projects and activities relating to the development and implementation 

of phase II of the storm water program of the Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2003

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize the use of funds made available for nonpoint 

source management programs for projects and activities 

relating to the development and implementation of phase 

II of the storm water program of the Environmental 

Protection Agency.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Storm Water Abate5 ment Act’’. 
2

•HR 3528 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PHASE II STORM WATER PROGRAM IMPLEMENTA2 TION AND MANAGEMENT. 

3 Section 319(h) of the Federal Water Pollution Con4 trol Act (33 U.S.C. 1329(h)) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(13) PHASE II STORM WATER IMPLEMENTA7 TION.—A State may use funds from a grant pro8 vided under this subsection—

9 ‘‘(A) to carry out a project or activity re10 lating to the development or implementation of 

11 phase II of the storm water program of the En12 vironmental Protection Agency established by 

13 the final rule entitled ‘National Pollutant Dis14 charge Elimination System—Regulations for 

15 Revision of the Water Pollution Control Pro16 gram Addressing Storm Water Discharges’, 

17 promulgated by the Administrator on December 

18 8, 1999 (64 Fed. Reg. 68722); and 

19 ‘‘(B) to implement a management program 

20 in a geographic jurisdiction for phase II of the 

21 program described in subparagraph (A).’’.

Æ
#### Hulsey *et al. v.*The State.

No. 8860.

August 11, 1932.

Hill, J.

The newly discovered evidence, including the counter-showing made by the State, is very voluminous, and has been carefully read and considered. The trial court did not abuse its discretion, after hearing this conflicting evidence, in refusing the extraordinary motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Russell, G. J., and Athvnson, J., who dissent.*

*361
      *William G. McRae,*for plaintiffs in error.

*George M. Napier, attorney-general, S. W. Ragsdale, solicitor-general,*and *T. R. Gress, assistant attorney-general,*contra.
#### Mary F. Smith et al., Appellants, *v.*Howard Gould, Respondent.

Appeal from order referring this action to Harry W. Bookstaver to hear and determine the same.

Jacob Marks, for appellants.

Howe & Hummel, for respondent.

McCarthy, J.

We have examined very carefully the papers presented by both sides on this appeal, as well as the cases referred to and are of'the opinion that this cause does not involve the examination of a long account as provided for in section 1013, Code of Civil Procedure and ought not to be referred.

Order appealed from reversed, with ten dollars’ costs and disbursements and motion denied, with ten dollars’ costs.

O’Dwyer and Schuchman, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with ten dollars’ costs and motion denied, with ten dollars’ costs.
National Cancer Institute

u.s. Department 

of health and

human services National Institutes

of Health

Managing Chemotherapy Side Effects

Constipation

What is constipation?

Are you having bowel movements that 

come less often than normal for you, 

are painful, or are hard to pass? This is 

called “constipation.”

Let your doctor or nurse know 

if you have not had a bowel 

movement in 2 days or if you 

have pain in your rectal area.

Take these steps:

Eat high-fiber foods such as: l Whole-grain breads and cereals l Fruits and vegetables l Nuts, seeds, and popcorn

Turn this sheet over to learn 

what other foods may help.

Drink lots of liquids. l Most people need to drink at least 

8 cups of liquid every day. Water 

is a good choice. So are fruit and 

vegetable juices, such as prune juice.

l Warm liquids such as coffee or tea 

may help.

Try to be active every day. l Walk or ride an exercise bike for 

15 to 30 minutes a day.

l Talk with your doctor to learn about 

other exercises that can help you.

“I had a hard time going to the 

bathroom. I also had cramps and gas. 

Drinking lots of water and eating 

high-fiber foods, like fruit and 

whole-grain bread, helped me.”
Managing Chemotherapy Side Effects: Constipation

Questions to ask 

your doctor or nurse:

1. What problems should I call you about?

2. Should I write down each time I have a 

bowel movement?

3. How much liquid should I drink each day?

4. What medicines are okay for me to take?

5. What exercises can help me?

6. Can you give me the name of a nutritionist, 

so I can learn more about foods that might 

help me?

NIH Publication No. 08-6461

Printed August 2008

These foods may help if you are constipated:

Breads and grains

•	Bran muffins

•	Bran or whole-grain cereals

•	Brown or wild rice

•	Cooked, dried peas and beans

(such as pinto, black, red, 

or kidney)

•	Whole-wheat

bread

•	Whole-wheat

pasta and tortillas

Fruits and vegetables

•	Dried fruit, such as apricots, dates,

prunes, and raisins

•	Fresh fruit, such as apples, blueberries,

and grapes

•	Raw or cooked

vegetables, such as 

broccoli, corn, 

green beans, 

peas, and 

spinach 

Snacks

•	Granola

•	Nuts

•	Popcorn

•	Seeds, such as

sunflower

Ask your doctor or nurse which foods are best for you.

Free Services to Learn More

National Cancer Institute

Cancer Information Service

Phone: 1-800-4-CANCER (1-800-422-6237)

TTY: 1-800-332-8615

Online: www.cancer.gov

Chat Online: www.cancer.gov/help
Opinion issued November 16, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00488-CR

———————————

NELSON THOMAS II, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1597108

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Nelson Thomas II, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of 

aggravated assault of a family member. On September 6, 2019, in accordance with 

appellant’s plea agreement with the State, the trial court signed an order deferring 

adjudication of guilt and placing appellant on community supervision for four years. 
2

Appellant, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal on June 26, 2020. We dismiss the 

appeal.

In criminal cases, the appellant must file a notice of appeal “within 30 days 

after the day sentence is imposed.” TEX. R. APP. P 26.2(a)(1). Because the order 

appealed was signed on September 6, 2019, the deadline for filing the notice of 

appeal was October 7, 2019. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on June 26, 2020, 

over eight months after the deadline. If an appeal is not timely perfected, then a court 

of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal and can 

take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 

210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Because appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely, we 

lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1.

Moreover, in a plea-bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters 

that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the 

trial court's permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02; TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant 

has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 

see Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Here, the clerk’s 

record supports the trial court’s certification that this is a plea-bargain case and that 

appellant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d); Dears, 154 

S.W.3d at 615. Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal 
3

without further action. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an 

appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a), must dismiss a 

prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
#### § 1206.702 Litigation.

In any instance in which a requester brings suit concerning a request for an Agency record under this part, the matter shall promptly be referred to the General Counsel with a report on the details and status of the request.
NEWTON AVIATION

Essential Air Service Subject: EAS service to Lewistown MT An unfortunate series ofevents have contributed to Lewistown's inabilityto maintain the minimum ridership qualification. With betterdecision making this could have been avoided but now is notthe time to address that issue. Economic impactto our community is my greatest concern. The EAS subsidy can only bejustified as atool 

### forcommunity economic development. There will be direct impacts to us at Newton Aviation. We have provided many services including fuel, maintenance, and others to EAS airlines overthe years we have been in business as an FBO on the Lewistown Airport. When I say impacts I mean JOBS. The community impacts are substantial knowing the importance ofAir Commerce. Being isolated will certainly hurtthese communities' long term prospects for growth. Motels, restaurants, car rentals, and airport funding will be very direct losses of hard dollars for business andjobs. From experience, we know that Lewistown can meet minimum standards for 

### EASfunding. 

### I hope you will give Lewistown that opportunity. Regards,

Donald 

### HNewton
- Owner Lewistown Airport 410 Skyline Drive Lewistown, MT 59457 406-538-8150-Qffice 406-538-8166-Fax 406-366-7892-cell newton@lewjstownairport.com Exxon Fuel 100,JetA Aircraft Maintenance Aerial Crop Spraying
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2374-2375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1016]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice

DATE AND TIME: January 19, 2000; 9:30 a.m.-5 p.m.

PLACE: Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

CLOSED MEETING: The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors 
(BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of 
issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international 
broadcasting. If necessary, the meeting will continue the following 
day, January 20, 2000, from 8 a.m. to 12 noon. They will address 
internal procedural, budgetary, and personnel issues, as well as 
sensitive foreign policy issues relating to potential options in the 
U.S. international broadcasting field. This meeting is closed because 
if open it likely would either disclose matters that would be properly 
classified to be kept

[[Page 2375]]

secret in the interest of foreign policy under the appropriate 
executive order (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information 
the premature disclosure of which would be likely to significantly 
frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 
552b.(c)(9)(B)) In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely 
to the internal personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the 
International Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6))

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact either Brenda Hardnett or John Lindburg 
at (202) 401-3736.

    Dated: January 11, 2000.
John A. Lindburg,
Legal Counsel and Acting Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 00-1016 Filed 1-11-00; 4:36 pm]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
Exhibit 10.8


Pacific Amber Resources, Ltd.


May 11, 2000


Mr. Thornton J. Donaldson
President
Uranium Power Corporation
Suite 206 - 475 Howe Street
Vancouver, B.C.
V6C 2B3

Re:      Termination of the Property Option Agreement
         Athabasca Basin, Uranium properties, Saskatchewan

This is to advise  you that  Pacific  Amber  Ltd.  wishes to  withdraw  from the
Property Option Agreement of March 24, 1999.

It is understood that Pacific Amber has fulfilled all the obligations  under the
said agreement.

Please sign a duplicate copy of this letter and return it to us at your earliest
convenience.


                                             Yours truly,
                                             PACIFIC AMBER RESOURCES LTD.


                                             /s/ Hiro Ogata
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Hiro Ogata, President

Acknowledged by,
URANIUM POWER CORPORATION


/s/ Thornton J. Donaldson
-------------------------------
Thornton J. Donaldson
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1093

TONY RAY COBBS, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BOTTLING GROUP, LLC, a/k/a Pepsi Bottling Group,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior 

District Judge. (4:11-cv-00011-JLK-RSB)

Submitted: June 14, 2012 Decided: June 19, 2012

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony Ray Cobbs, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin D. Holden, JACKSON 

LEWIS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tony Ray Cobbs, Sr., appeals the district court’s 

order granting summary judgment for Bottling Group, LLC, in his 

employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Cobbs v. Bottling Group, 

LLC, No. 4:11-cv-00011-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Dec. 21, 2011). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Subsidiaries
                                  ------------


1.       Rexall Showcase International, Inc.

2.       Rexall Showcase International de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

3.       Importadora Rexall Showcase International de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

4.       Servicios Rexall Showcase International de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

5.       Asociacion de Vendedores Independientes en Rexall, A.C.

6.       Rexall Korea Limited

7.       RSL Holdings, Inc.

8.       Rexall Hong Kong Limited

9.       RXSD Inc.

10.      Rexall Showcase Taiwan, Inc.

11.      Rexall Showcase Japan, Inc.

12.      Richardson Labs, Inc.
#### §§ 701.7-701.13 [Reserved]
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 CITY OF ARTESIA, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3

v. NO. 33,477 4 RANDALL B. THOMAS, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF EDDY COUNTY 7 Lisa B. Riley, District Judge 8 Viola Rhodes 9 Artesia, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Dick A. Blendan 12 Carlsbad, NM 13 for Appellant 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION 15 HANISEE, Judge. 162 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed summary disposition. No me morandum opposing summary affirmance has 2 been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. 3 {2} AFFIRMED. 4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

____________________________________ 6 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8

___________________________________ 9 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 10

___________________________________ 11 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 12
#### § 367.4 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3460 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3460

To prohibit assistance to be provided to the Palestinian Authority and 
      the Palestinian people until the perpetrators, or suspected 
  perpetrators, of the killings of United States citizens in Gaza on 
   October 15, 2003, are surrendered to the United States Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 6, 2003

  Mr. Flake introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit assistance to be provided to the Palestinian Authority and 
      the Palestinian people until the perpetrators, or suspected 
  perpetrators, of the killings of United States citizens in Gaza on 
   October 15, 2003, are surrendered to the United States Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON ASSISTANCE FOR THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY AND 
              THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, amounts available for 
assistance for the Palestinian Authority (or any other Palestinian 
entity) or for the Palestinian people may not be obligated or expended 
until the perpetrators, or suspected perpetrators, of the killings of 
United States citizens in Gaza on October 15, 2003, are surrendered to 
the United States Government.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10459]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

April 20, 2000.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before May 30, 2000, 
to be assured of consideration.

Bureau of the Public Debt (PD)

    OMB Number: 1535-0060.
    Form Number: PD F 2488-1.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Certificate by Legal Representative(s) of Decedent's Estate 
During Administration of Authority to Act and of Distribution Where 
Estate Holds No More Than $1,000 (face amount) U.S. Savings and 
Retirement Securities.
    Description: PD F 2488-1 is used by legal representatives of 
decedent's estate to establish authority to act and to request 
disposition of securities.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 6,300.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden Hours: 1,575 hours.

    OMB Number: 1535-0118.
    Form Number: PD F 5336.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Application for Disposition, United States Savings Bonds/
Notes and/or Related Checks Owned by Decedent Whose Estate is Being 
Settled Without Administration.
    Description: PD F 4881 is used by person(s) entitled to a 
decedent's estate not being administered to request payment or reissue 
of Savings Bonds/Notes and/or related checks.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 80,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 30 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden Hours: 40,000 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Vicki S. Thorpe, (304) 480-6553, Bureau of the 
Public Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, West VA 26106-1328.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860,
    Office of Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-10459 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-40-U
§ 117.25 Rest period. ( a ) No certificate holder may assign and no flightcrew member may accept assignment to any reserve or duty with the certificate holder during any required rest period.
( b ) Before beginning any reserve or flight duty period a flightcrew member must be given at least 30 consecutive hours free from all duty within the past 168 consecutive hour period.
( c ) If a flightcrew member operating in a new theater has received 36 consecutive hours of rest, that flightcrew member is acclimated and the rest period meets the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) A flightcrew member must be given a minimum of 56 consecutive hours rest upon return to home base if the flightcrew member: ( 1 ) Travels more than 60° longitude during a flight duty period or a series of flight duty period, and
( 2 ) is away from home base for more than 168 consecutive hours during this travel. The 56 hours of rest specified in this section must encompass three physiological nights' rest based on local time.
( e ) No certificate holder may schedule and no flightcrew member may accept an assignment for any reserve or flight duty period unless the flightcrew member is given a rest period of at least 10 consecutive hours immediately before beginning the reserve or flight duty period measured from the time the flightcrew member is released from duty. The 10 hour rest period must provide the flightcrew member with a minimum of 8 uninterrupted hours of sleep opportunity.
( f ) If a flightcrew member determines that a rest period under paragraph (e) of this section will not provide eight uninterrupted hours of sleep opportunity, the flightcrew member must notify the certificate holder. The flightcrew member cannot report for the assigned flight duty period until he or she receives a rest period specified in paragraph (e) of this section.
( g ) If a flightcrew member engaged in deadhead transportation exceeds the applicable flight duty period in Table B of this part, the flightcrew member must be given a rest period equal to the length of the deadhead transportation but not less than the required rest in paragraph (e) of this section before beginning a flight duty period.
[Doc. No. FAA-2009-1093, 77 FR 398, Jan. 4, 2012; Amdt. 117-1A, 77 FR 28764, May 16, 2012; Amdt. 117-1, 78 FR 8362, Feb. 6, 2013]