alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 614.4175 Uninsured voluntary and involuntary accounts. ( a ) Borrowers may make voluntary advance payments on their loans or, under agreement with a System institution, may make voluntary advance conditional payments intended to be applied to future maturities. The monies in the advance conditional payment accounts may be available for return to the borrower in lieu of increasing his loan. System institutions may pay interest on advance conditional payments for the time the funds are held unapplied at a rate not to exceed the rate charged on the related loan(s). System institutions shall hold any advance conditional payments received in accordance with this section in voluntary advance payment accounts.
( b ) System institutions may establish involuntary payment accounts including, but not limited to, funds held for the borrower, such as loan proceeds to be disbursed for which the borrower is obligated; the unapplied insurance proceeds arising from any insured loss; and total insurance premiums and applicable taxes collected in advance in connection with any loan.
[53 FR 35454, Sept. 14, 1988. Redesignated at 75 FR 35968, June 24, 2010]
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-123474) pertaining to the1996 Amended Equity Compensation Plan and 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of Icagen, Inc. of our report dated February 14, 2006, with respect to the financial statements of Icagen, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2005. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Ernst & Young LLP

 

Raleigh, North Carolina 

March 13, 2006
# C_2012098EN.01001701.xml

| 31.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/17

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov (Slovakia) lodged on 23 January 2012 — Valeria Marcinová v Pohotovosť, s.r.o.

(Case C-30/12)

2012/C 98/27

Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Referring court

Okresný súd Prešov

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Valeria Marcinová

Applicant:

Defendant: Pohotovosť, s.r.o.

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do Articles 38 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in conjunction with Article 169 TFEU preclude the application of national legislation under which, on the basis of an agreement on deductions from salary, such deductions are made from the consumer in the absence of any judicial control of unfair clauses and according to which the consumer has no direct possibility of annulling those deductions?

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 1214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-251]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-431-000]


The United Illuminating Company; Notice of Filing

January 5, 2009.
    Take notice that on December 19, 2008, The United Illuminating 
Company (United Illuminating), pursuant to section 205 of the Federal 
Power Act, filed an Interconnection Agreement, with Wheelabrator 
Bridgeport, L.P., Service Agreement No. 24 under United Illuminating's 
FERC Electric Tariff Second Revised Volume 4.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#60262532232f0e0c090e05331510100f121420060512034e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fc9caddccc0e1e3e6e1eadcfaffffe0fdfbcfe9eafdeca1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 12, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-251 Filed 1-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2015193EN.01000901.xml

| 11.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/9

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

(2015/C 193/07)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 18 March 2015 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 75525 |
| Decision No | : | 84/15/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Alleged cross-subsidisation of maritime courses provided by Redningsselskapet and the University of Tromsø |
| Type of measure | : | No State aid |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

18 March 2015

Case No

Case No

:

75525

Decision No

Decision No

:

84/15/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Alleged cross-subsidisation of maritime courses provided by Redningsselskapet and the University of Tromsø

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

No State aid

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Defense Business Board (DBB)

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Meeting notice; cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense published an announcement of a 
meeting of the Defense Business Board (DBB) on October 1, 2009 (74 FR 
50782-50783). The meeting was scheduled for October 22, 2009. This 
meeting has been cancelled. This meeting may be rescheduled and 
announced at a later date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Debora Duffy, Defense Business 
Board, 1155 Defense Pentagon, Room 5B-1088A, Washington, DC 20301-1155, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#da9ebfb8b5a8bbf4beafbcbca39ab5a9bef4b7b3b6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f5b7a7d706d7e317b6a7979665f706c7b31727673">[email protected]</span></a>, (703) 697-2168.

    Dated: October 7, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-24888 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6262

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

LOUIS SAMUELS,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (3:91-cr-00033-GCM-1)

Submitted: April 29, 2010 Decided: May 4, 2010

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis Samuels, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Louis Samuels appeals the district court’s text order

denying as frivolous his petition for a writ of audita querela. 

In his petition to the district court, Samuels argued that 

Amendment 709 of the Sentencing Guidelines requires that the 

district court re-sentence him without a career offender 

designation. Despite Samuels’ contentions to the contrary, 

alternative remedies existed by which Samuels should have raised 

the instant claim challenging his criminal conviction and 

sentence. See United States v. Torres, 282 F.3d 1241, 1245 

(10th Cir. 2002) (“[A] writ of audita querela is not available 

to a petitioner when other remedies exist, such as a motion to 

vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.” (internal quotation 

marks omitted)). Accordingly, the district court did not err in 

denying Samuels’ motion. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### N. M. Comer, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Frances Hetherington, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion Filed March 25, 1913.

Appealed from the Circuit Court of Polk County.

Per Curiam.

The findings and judgment in this case are similar to those in the case of Brown v. Hetherington this day decided; therefore, on the authority of that case the judgment herein is reversed.
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION July 18 , 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Ford on April 14, 2011 FROM: Don Kopinski TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 2010 - 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on April 14 , 2011 b etween Ford and EPA staff. The following people attended : Ford : Cy nthia Wiliams , Ken McAlinden, Al ys sa Werthman, Satish Atluri, Bob Thomas , Will Ruona EPA: By ron Bunker, Tony

Fernandez., Angela Cullen, Cle Jackson, Bob Peavy house, Don Kopinski The discussion focused on anal ytically derived CO2, off

- cycle credits for vocational vehicles, vocational vehicle tire req uirements, and certification of incomplete vehicles with no complete sister vehicle.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

                       AMENDMENT TO OPERATING AGREEMENT OF
                           ARIZONA HEART HOSPITAL, LLC

         THIS AMENDMENT (the "Amendment") to the Operating Agreement (the
"Operating Agreement") of Arizona Heart Hospital, LLC (the "Company") is made
and entered pursuant to Section 11.2 of the Operating Agreement.

                                    RECITALS

         WHEREAS, the Members desire to amend the Operating Agreement in
accordance with the terms of this Amendment.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency which is hereby acknowledged, the Members agree as follows:

         1.       The following provision is hereby inserted as the third
paragraph of Section 8.4 of the Operating Agreement:

                  Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in
         the event that no later than December 31, 2001 MedCath
         Holdings, Inc. ("MHI") or one of MHI's Affiliates conducts an
         underwritten public offering of the common stock of MHI or
         its Affiliate pursuant to an effective registration statement
         under the Securities Act of 1933, as then in effect, and MHI
         or MHI's Affiliate offers shares of its common stock or cash
         to any Member in exchange for such Member's Membership
         Interest or a portion thereof owned by such Member (the
         "Exchange"), MHI and its Affiliates and the Member may,
         notwithstanding the terms of this Agreement, engage in such
         Exchange upon such terms as the Member and MHI or MHI's
         Affiliate may mutually agree, and the Exchange shall not be
         subject to any restrictions on the transfer of Membership
         Interests or rights of first refusal of the Company or of any
         other Member set forth in this Agreement, including, but not
         limited to, those restrictions set forth in this Section 8.4.

         2.       All terms not defined herein shall have the meaning provided
therefor in the Operating Agreement.

         3.       Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions
of the Operating Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         4.       This Amendment shall be effective when approved by the Members
in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Operating Agreement

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Members have approved and consented to this
Amendment as of the 25th day of April, 2001.


                                                   ARIZONA HEART HOSPITAL, LLC
                                                   By AHH Management, Inc.

                                                   By:  /s/ R. William Moore Jr.
                                                            --------------------
                                                   Its:     President
                                                            --------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Icagen, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, P. Kay Wagoner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Dated: March 7, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ P. Kay Wagoner     
|                     |  |  |  | P. Kay Wagoner, Ph.D.  
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### § 1203.302 Compilation.

A compilation of items that are individually unclassified may be classified if the compiled information reveals an additional association or relationship that meets the standards of classification under the Order; and is not otherwise revealed in the individual items of information. As used in the Order, compilations mean an aggregate of pre-existing unclassified items of information.

[78 FR 5118, Jan. 24, 2013]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10198]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Public Meeting

    The Rocky Mountain States Regulatory Fairness Board will hold a 
public hearing on May 1, 2000 at the Sheraton Hotel/Sioux Falls 
Convention Center, 1211 N. West Av., Sioux Falls, SD at 1 p.m. The 
purpose of the hearing is to receive comments and testimony from small 
businesses and representatives of trade associations concerning 
regulatory enforcement or compliance actions taken by federal agencies. 
Transcripts of these proceedings will be posted on the Internet. These 
transcripts are subject only to limited review by the National 
Ombudsman. Contact: Gary P. Peele (312) 353-0880.

Bettie Baca,
Counselor to the Administrator/Public Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-10198 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 99.2



ELECTROGLAS, INC.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the periodic report of Electroglas, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Thomas E. Brunton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and
for the periods indicated.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                     |  |  |  |    
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---
|                    
|Date: March 28, 2003 |  |  |  | By:
|                     |  |  |  |
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-96212 of Sanctuary Woods Multimedia Corporation on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement No. 33-95464 of Sanctuary Woods Multimedia Corporation on Form S-3 of
our report dated February 23, 1995 (except for Note 2 which is as of March 10,
1995 and Notes 9 and 15 which are as of September 20, 1995) which includes
explanatory paragraphs referring to the Company's change in functional and
reporting currency to United States dollars from Canadian dollars effective July
1, 1994 and November 1, 1994, respectively, and the 1994 consolidated financial
statements having been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles of the United States appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-3
of Sanctuary Woods Multimedia Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1995.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE
 
Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, Canada
 
January 13, 1997
#### Willis Castaing, as Mayor, of the City of Tarpon Springs, Florida, and H. Joe Smith, as City Clerk of the City of Tarpon Springs, Florida, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. State of Florida, ex rel., L. D. Vinson, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion Filed March 6, 1923.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; M. A. McMullen, Judge.

*Whitaker, Himes & Whitaker*and *James F. Sikes,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Bwd*& *Jones,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This writ of error was taken to a peremptory writ of mandamus issued by the Circuit Judge commanding the mayor and clerk of the municipality to issue and deliver to the relator a warrant of the city for $3500.00 and to receive from relator a deed purporting to convey real estate to the city.

It does not appear that the city authorities had duly purchased and accepted the' property and had duly ordered the warrant to be issued, therefore mandamus is not applicable.

Reversed.

*290Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne and West, J. J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1021]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Government in the Sunshine Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, January 19, 2000.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW, Washington, DC 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: January 12, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-1021 Filed 1-12-00; 11:27 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
§ 622.61 Adjustment of civil money penalties by the rate of inflation under the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended. ( a ) The maximum amount of each civil money penalty within FCA's jurisdiction is adjusted in accordance with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended (28 U.S.C. 2461 note), as follows: ( 1 ) Amount of civil money penalty imposed under section 5.32 of the Act for violation of a final order issued under section 5.25 or 5.26 of the Act: The maximum daily amount is $2,830 for violations that occur on or after January 15, 2024.
( 2 ) Amount of civil money penalty for violation of the Act or regulations: the maximum daily amount is $1,280 for each violation that occurs on or after January 15, 2024.
( b ) The maximum civil money penalty amount assessed under 42 U.S.C. 4012a(f) is $2,661 for each violation that occurs on or after January 15, 2024, with no cap on the total amount of penalties that can be assessed against any single institution during any calendar year.
[89 FR 2118, Jan. 12, 2024]