alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24685-24686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10483]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EMERGENCY OIL AND GAS GUARANTEED LOAN BOARD


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Emergency Oil and Gas Guaranteed Loan Board has submitted to 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following 
proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). This collection has 
been submitted under the emergency Paperwork Reduction Act procedures.

[[Page 24686]]

    Agency: Emergency Oil and Gas Guaranteed Loan Board.
    Title: Guarantee Agreement.
    Agency Form Number: None.
    OMB Approval Number: None.
    Type of Request: New collection--Emergency Review.
    Burden: 1,475 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 20.
    Average Hours per Response: 80.
    Needs and Uses: Pursuant to ``The Emergency Oil and Gas Guaranteed 
Loan Program Act of 1999,'' Chapter 2, Public Law 106-51, the Emergency 
Oil and Gas Guaranteed Loan Board developed a guarantee agreement that 
must be signed by qualified oil and gas companies that receive loan 
guarantees. The information being collected will be used and is 
necessary to ensure that the applicant is meeting the conditions of the 
guarantee agreement and to protect the Federal government from default 
and/or fraud. The information is also required as supporting 
documentation for annual or other audits that may be conducted by or on 
behalf of the Board or by the General Accounting Office (GAO) for as 
long as the guarantee agreement is in effect.
    Affected Public: Businesses.
    Frequency: Quarterly and, if applicable, in the event of 
noncompliance with terms of the guarantee agreement.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary but required to obtain a loan 
guarantee.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5027, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 
10202, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, 
DC 20503. A clearance has been requested by May 12, 2000.

    Dated: April 21, 2000.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information 
Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-10483 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-BP-P
§ 303.46 Financial education programs that include the provision of bank products and services. No branch application or prior approval is required in order for a state nonmember bank to participate in one or more financial education programs that involve receiving deposits, paying withdrawals, or lending money if: ( a ) Such service or services are provided on school premises, or a facility used by the school;
( b ) Such service or services are provided at the discretion of the school;
( c ) The principal purpose of each program is financial education. For example, the principal purpose of a program would be considered to be financial education if the program is designed to teach students the principles of personal financial management, banking operations, or the benefits of saving for the future, and is not designed for the purpose of profit-making; and
( d ) Each program is conducted in a manner that is consistent with safe and sound banking practices and complies with applicable law.
[73 FR 35338, June 23, 2008]
Environmental Court of Vermont 

State of Vermont 

=============================================================================== 

E N T R Y R E G A R D I N G M O T I O N 

=============================================================================== 

JLD Properties-Wal-Mart Stormwater Discharge Permit, Docket No. 129-5-06 Vtec 

Project: Wal-Mart St. Albans and 221-10-07 Vtec 

Applicant: JLD Properties 

 (Appeal from ANR Storm Water Permit determination) 

Title: Motion to Dismiss R.L Vallee as an Interested Party, No. 4 

Filed: October 16, 2008 

Filed By: Stewart H. McConaughy, Attorney for Appellee JLD Properties 

Response: NONE 

_X_ Granted ___ Denied ___ Other 

Appellee-Applicant JLD Properties of St. Albans, LLC, has moved to 

dismiss R.L. Vallee, Inc., as an Interested Party in Docket Numbers 129-5-06 

Vtec (stormwater discharge permit appeal) and 221-10-07 Vtec (construction 

discharge permit appeal). No party has filed a response opposing this motion. 

In general, interested parties must enter an appearance “within 20 days” 

of the last notice of appeal being served. V.R.E.C.P. 5(c). R.L. Valley’s 

October 6, 2008 Notice of Appearance missed this filing deadline by many months 

(or even years) for these docket numbers. 

Even if we were to treat R.L. Valley’s Notice of Appearance as a motion 

to intervene, such motions must be “timely.” V.R.E.C.P. 5(c). We find that 

R.L. Vallee’s attempted late entrance into these dockets, at a time when 

deadlines for pre-filed testimony were quickly approaching, was not timely. We 

also note that R.L. Vallee has chosen not to offer a substantive basis for its 

interested person status in these appeals, whether it be timely or not. 

 For these reasons, we GRANT JLD Properties’ motion to dismiss R.L. Vallee 

as an Interested Party. 

___________________________________________ __February 10, 2009___ 

 Thomas S. Durkin, Judge Date 

=============================================================================== 

Date copies sent to: ____________ Clerk's Initials _______ 

Copies sent to: 

 Stewart H. McConaughy, Attorney for Appellee/Applicant JLD Properties, 

 joined by Co-Counsel for Appellee, Robert F. O'Neill, Esq. 

 Jon Groveman, Attorney for Appellant Vt. Natural Resources Council 

 Jon T. Anderson, Attorney for Interested Person R.L. Vallee, Inc. 

 Judith L. Dillon, Attorney for Agency of Natural Resources 

 Mark L. Lucas, Attorney for NRB/Water Resources Panel 

 David A. Barra, Attorney for Town of St. Albans

 Brian S. Dunkiel, Attorney for City of St. Albans (FYI purposes only) 

 John H. Hasen, Attorney for NRB/Land Use Panel (FYI purposes only) 

 John K. Dunleavy, Attorney for Vt. Agency of Transportation (FYI only)
Exhibit 99


                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Pioneer  Railcorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  we, Guy  L.Brenkman,
President and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and J. Michael Carr,  Chief  Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Guy L. Brenkman                            /s/ J. Michael Carr
-------------------------------------          ---------------------------------
Guy L. Brenkman                                J. Michael Carr
President and Chief Executive Officer          Chief Financial Officer


August 8, 2002


                                        1
M A N D A T E

TO THE 36TH DISTRICT COURT of LIVE OAK COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 5th day of

March, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

William Bradley Yates, Appellant,

v.

Texas Department of Public Safety Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-14-00659-CV (Tr.Ct.No. L-14-0114-CV-A)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal,

concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in

accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 21st day of September, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK

FILE COPY
Order filed August 10, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00271-CV

___________

KENNETH L. SUGG, JR. AND MARINA F. CASTILLO SUGG, Appellants

V.

LAKEISHA RANDLE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 269th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 321010269

O R D E R

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter 

for the 269th District Court informed this court that appellants had not requested 

the reporter’s record be prepared. On June 14, 2021, the clerk of this court notified 

appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do not require a 

reporter s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided this court 

with proof the record has been requested and payment arrangements for the record

have been made. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply. 
Unless appellant provides this court with proof the record has been requested 

and payment arrangements have been made, appellants’ brief will be set due when 

the clerk’s record is filed, and we will consider and decide those issues that do not 

require a reporter’s record.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justice Hassan and Poissant.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3740 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3740

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 223 South Main Street in Roxboro, North Carolina, as the ``Oscar 
                  Scott Woody Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2004

Mr. Miller of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. Ballance, Mr. Etheridge, 
Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Mr. Burr, Mr. 
Coble, Mr. McIntyre, Mr. Hayes, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Taylor 
 of North Carolina, and Mr. Watt) introduced the following bill; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 223 South Main Street in Roxboro, North Carolina, as the ``Oscar 
                  Scott Woody Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OSCAR SCOTT WOODY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 223 South Main Street in Roxboro, North Carolina, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Oscar Scott Woody Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Oscar Scott 
Woody Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
PUBLIC LAW 110–64—AUG. 9, 2007 121 STAT. 567 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1722: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

May 21, 22, considered and passed House. 

Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–64 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 601 Banyan 

Trail in Boca Raton, Florida, as the ‘‘Leonard W. Herman Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LEONARD W. HERMAN POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 601 Banyan Trail in Boca Raton, Florida, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Leonard W. Herman Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Leonard W. Herman Post Office’’. 

Approved August 9, 2007. 

Aug. 9, 2007 

[H.R. 1722]
#### G. W. Hall and J. P. DuBois, Co-Partners, *Plaintiffs in*Error, v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion Filed Feb. 4,. 1913.

Per Curiam.

Upon the authority of Fornel v. Florida East Coast Railway Company this day decided, the judgment herein is reversed.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Dade County.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION
-------------

I, Thomas K. Emery, in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer for Internet
Services Corporation, which provides financial management services to
Yager/Kuester Public Fund Limited Partnership, have reviewed the internal
accounting records of Yager/Kuester Public Fund Limited Partnership on behalf of
the general partner, certify that (i) the Form 10-Q Report of Yager/Kuester
Public Fund Limited Partnership for the quarter ending September 30, 2002 to
which this certification is attached fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in such Form 10-Q report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Yager/Kuester
Public Fund Limited Partnership.




Date       11/14/02                        By:        /s/ Thomas K. Emery
     ---------------------                     ---------------------------------
                                                       Thomas K. Emery
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3363

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to permit States to obtain 

reimbursement under the Medicaid Program for care or services required 

under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act that 

are provided in a nonpublicly owned or operated institution for mental 

diseases. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 21, 2003

Mr. MCCRERY (for himself and Mr. ALLEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to permit 

States to obtain reimbursement under the Medicaid Program for care or services required under the Emergency 

Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act that are provided in a nonpublicly owned or operated institution for 

mental diseases.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicaid Psychiatric 

5 Hospital Fairness Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 3363 IH 

1 SEC. 2. MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT FOR CARE OR SERV2 ICES REQUIRED UNDER EMTALA THAT ARE 

3 PROVIDED IN A NONPUBLICLY OWNED OR 

4 OPERATED INSTITUTION FOR MENTAL DIS5 EASES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1905 of the Social Secu7 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d) is amended—

8 (1) in subsection (a), in the subdivision (B) fol9 lowing paragraph (27), by inserting ‘‘subject to sub10 section (x),’’ after ‘‘(B)’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(x)(1) In the case of an institution for mental dis13 eases that is not publicly owned or operated and that is 

14 subject to the requirements of section 1867, the limitation 

15 of subdivision (B) following paragraph (27) in subsection 

16 (a) (relating to limitations on payments for care or serv17 ices for individuals under 65 years of age who are patients 

18 in an institution for mental diseases) shall not apply to 

19 the provision of care or services required to stabilize an 

20 emergency medical condition, the treatment for which is 

21 within the range of services that such institution typically 

22 provides, of an individual who has attained age 21 but 

23 who has not attained age 65 and who came or was trans24 ferred to the institution, if—

25 ‘‘(A) the institution determines that the indi26 vidual has such an emergency medical condition; and 
3

•HR 3363 IH 

1 ‘‘(B) the institution provides such care or serv2 ices. 

3 ‘‘(2) In this subsection—

4 ‘‘(A) the term ‘stabilize’ has the meaning given 

5 that term in section 1867(e)(3)(A); and 

6 ‘‘(B) the term ‘emergency medical condition’ 

7 has the meaning given that term in section 

8 1867(e)(1).’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 subsection (a) apply to care and services furnished on or 

11 after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         599,987
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,068,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,933,933
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,014,332
<PP&E>                                         628,877
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,080,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,322,677
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,749
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,662,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,080,085
<SALES>                                     35,862,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,862,243
<CGS>                                       29,595,049
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,595,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,188,109
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             203,939
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,124,854)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,317,006
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,441,860)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,441,860)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.81)
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 747

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 747.611 Comments by other parties.

Any party to a proceeding other than the applicant and counsel for NCUA may file comments on an application within 30 days after service of the application or on an answer within 15 days after service of the answer. A commenting party may not participate further in proceedings on the application unless the administrative law judge or the NCUA Board determines that the public interest requires such participation in order to permit full exploration of matters raised in the comments.

[56 FR 37767, Aug. 8, 1991, as amended at 75 FR 34622, June 18, 2010]
(LOGO)

KPMG
Stamford Square
3001 Summer Street
Stamford, CT 06905

Telephone 203 356 9800
Fax 203 967 3503

Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors People's Bank:

We have  examined  management's  assertion  about  compliance  by People's  Bank
("People's")  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers  as of and for  the  year  ended  December  31,  1998,  included  in the
accompanying  Management Report dated March 12, 1999.  Management is responsible
for  the  Bank's  compliance  with  those  minimum  servicing   standards.   Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about People's
compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining on a test basis, evidence about the Bank's compliance with the minimum
servicing  standards  and  performing  such other  procedures  as we  considered
necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination  provides a
reasonable  basis for our  opinion.  Our  examination  does not  provide a legal
determination on People's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In  our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that  the  Bank  complied  with  the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 1998 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

KPMG LLP

March 12, 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CO-933-00-1320-EL; COC 61209, CO-933-00-1320-EL; COC 61357] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Corrected sale date. 

# SUMMARY:

Bureau of Land Management, Colorado State Office, Lakewood, Colorado, hereby gives notice to correct the sale date for two notices of coal lease offering by sealed bid published in 65 FR 20827-20828 on April 18, 2000. 

                        On page 20827, second column, middle of page, the paragraph reading “                        **DATES:**                         The lease sale will be held at 10 a.m., Tuesday, May 23, 2000. Sealed bids must be submitted no later than 9 a.m., Tuesday, May 23, 2000.”, change both dates to “Wednesday, May 31, 2000.”                     

                        On page 20828, first column, bottom third of page, the paragraph reading “                        **Dates:**                         The lease sale will be held at 1 p.m. Tuesday, May 23, 2000. Sealed bids must be submitted no later than 12 noon, Tuesday, May 23, 2000.”, change both dates to “Wednesday, May 31, 2000.”                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Purvis at (303) 239-3795. 

Dated: April 20, 2000. 

Matthew R. McColm, 

Mining Engineer, Branch of Solid Minerals, Resource Services. 

[FR Doc. 00-10352 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-U