alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
0 3 6 12 18 24 30

Miles

Map 65

^ Harlowton

^Roundup

T7N

§¦ ̈

^Pompeys

 Pillar

T1

^Big Timber

N

Billings^

§¦ ̈

T2 Columbus S ^ § ̈¦

Bridger

^

T8S

R18E R29E Montana

R103W R93W Wyoming

T

57N

Wyoming

Mineral Materials

Open and Closed Areas

Alternative D

Location Map

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü

Locatable Withdrawals are processed by Lands

and Realty; as a result Locatable Withdrawals section

is identical to the Lands and Realty Withdrawals section.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Legend

Map scale 1:900,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Mineral Materials Closed

Mineral Materials Open

Interstate

Highway

^ Towns

Public Lands Survey System

94

90

90
#### § 1209.403 Organizational location.

The Board shall be established within an office or department of NASA as designated by the Administrator.

[76 FR 44462, July 26, 2011]
§ 1203.412 Classification guides. ( a ) *General.* A classification guide, based upon classification determinations made by appropriate program and classification authorities, shall be issued for each classified system, program or project. Classification guides shall: ( 1 ) Identify the information elements to be protected, using categorization and subcategorization to the extent necessary to ensure that the information involved can be readily and uniformly identified.
( 2 ) State which of the classification designations (i.e., Top Secret, Secret or Confidential) apply to the identified information elements.
( 3 ) State the duration of each specified classification in terms of a period of time or future event. If the original classification authority cannot determine an earlier specific date or event for declassification, information shall be marked for declassification 10 years from the date of the original decision, unless the original classification authority otherwise determines that the sensitivity of the information requires it be marked for declassification for up to 25 years from the date of the original decision.
( 4 ) Indicate specifically that the designations, time limits, markings and other requirements of “the Order” are to be applied to information classified pursuant to the guide.
( 5 ) All security classification guides should be forwarded to the Office of Protective Services for review and final approval. The Office of Protective Services will maintain a list of all classification guides in current use.
( b ) *Review of classification guides.* Classification guides shall be reviewed by the originator for currency and accuracy not less than once every five years. Changes shall be in strict conformance with the provisions of this part 1203 and shall be issued promptly. If no changes are made, the originator shall so annotate the record copy and show the date of the review.
[44 FR 34913, June 18, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 5891, Feb. 9, 1983; 78 FR 5119, Jan. 24, 2013]
§ 121.418 Differences training and related aircraft differences training. ( a ) *Differences training.* ( 1 ) Differences training for crewmembers and dispatchers must consist of at least the following as applicable to their assigned duties and responsibilities: ( i ) Instruction in each appropriate subject or part thereof required for initial ground training in the airplane unless the Administrator finds that particular subjects are not necessary.
( ii ) Flight training in each appropriate maneuver or procedure required for initial flight training in the airplane unless the Administrator finds that particular maneuvers or procedures are not necessary.
( iii ) The number of programmed hours of ground and flight training determined by the Administrator to be necessary for the airplane, the operation, and the crewmember or aircraft dispatcher involved.
( 2 ) Differences training for all variations of a particular type airplane may be included in initial, transition, conversion, upgrade, and recurrent training for the airplane.
( b ) *Related aircraft differences training.* ( 1 ) In order to seek approval of related aircraft differences training for flightcrew members, a certificate holder must submit a request for related aircraft designation to the Administrator, and obtain approval of that request.
( 2 ) If the Administrator determines under paragraph (b)(1) of this section that a certificate holder is operating related aircraft, the certificate holder may submit to the Administrator a request for approval of a training program that includes related aircraft differences training.
( 3 ) A request for approval of a training program that includes related aircraft differences training must include at least the following: ( i ) Each appropriate subject required for the ground training for the related aircraft.
( ii ) Each appropriate maneuver or procedure required for the flight training and crewmember emergency training for the related aircraft.
( iii ) The number of programmed hours of ground training, flight training and crewmember emergency training necessary based on review of the related aircraft and the duty position.
( c ) *Approved related aircraft differences training.* Approved related aircraft differences training for flightcrew members may be included in initial, transition, conversion, upgrade and recurrent training for the base aircraft. If the certificate holder's approved training program includes related aircraft differences training in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, the training required by §§ 121.419, 121.420, 121.424, 121.425, 121.426, and 121.427, as applicable to flightcrew members, may be modified for the related aircraft.
[Doc. No. 9509, 35 FR 90, Jan. 3, 1970, as amended by Amdt. 121-366, 78 FR 67839, Nov. 12, 2013; Amdt. 121-382, 85 FR 10922, Feb. 25, 2020]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3707

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize the Secretary 

of Health and Human Services to negotiate fair prices for Medicare 

prescription drugs on behalf of Medicare beneficiaries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2004

Mr. MOORE (for himself, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, Mr. BURTON

of Indiana, Mr. EMANUEL, and Mr. WAMP) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 

addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate 

fair prices for Medicare prescription drugs on behalf 

of Medicare beneficiaries.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare’s Equitable 

5 Drugs for Seniors Act of 2004’’. 
2

•HR 3707 IH 

1 SEC. 2. NEGOTIATING FAIR PRICES FOR MEDICARE PRE2 SCRIPTION DRUGS ON BEHALF OF MEDICARE 

3 BENEFICIARIES. 

4 Section 1860D–11 of the Social Security Act, as 

5 added by section 101(a) of the Medicare Prescription 

6 Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, is 

7 amended by striking subsection (i) (relating to noninter8 ference) and by inserting the following: 

9 ‘‘(i) AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE PRICES WITH MAN10 UFACTURERS.—In order to ensure that beneficiaries en11 rolled under prescription drug plans and MA–PD plans 

12 pay the lowest possible price, the Secretary shall have au13 thority similar to that of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

14 Secretary of Defense, and the heads of other Federal 

15 agencies and departments that purchase prescription 

16 drugs in bulk to negotiate contracts with manufacturers 

17 of covered part D drugs, consistent with the requirements 

18 and in furtherance of the goals of providing quality care 

19 and containing costs under this part.’’.

Æ
#### §§ 410.141-410.148 [Reserved]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1 See Scott v. Commissioner, 182 F.3d 915 (5th Cir. 1999).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 07-60573

Summary Calendar

_____________________

SAM E. SCOTT,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States Tax Court

(2537-05L)

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner-Appellant Sam E. Scott has managed to stall, delay, avoid,

and otherwise keep from paying his 1991 income tax deficiency that was

determined on its merits by the United States Tax Court in June, 1998 and

affirmed by this court in June, 1999.1 Scott is again before us on appeal from

the United States Tax Court, this time seeking reversal of that Court’s

Memorandum Opinion filed April 17, 2007, holding that the Commissioner’s

pursuit of collection by filing notices of federal tax liens was not an abuse of

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 23, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
2

discretion. We affirm.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, the briefs of the

parties, and the applicable law; and our review satisfies us completely that

the United States Tax Court correctly determined that the Commissioner did

not abuse his discretion in any way, shape, or form in endeavoring to collect

taxes, interest, etc. previously determined to be due and owing by Scott.

Specifically, the Commissioner did not abuse his discretion in the filing of the

above-said notices of federal tax liens. For essentially the reasons set forth in

the aforesaid Memorandum Opinion, the judgment appealed from is, in all

respects,

AFFIRMED.
Filed 8/26/15

Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Three - No. B248654

S217616

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

En Banc

________________________________________________________________________

BARRON NICHOLAS HILTON, Petitioner,

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent;

THE PEOPLE et al., Real Parties in Interest.

________________________________________________________________________

The request for republication of the Court of Appeal's opinion, originally 

published at 224 Cal.App.4th 47, is granted.

______________________________

 Chief Justice
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10272]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice Number 3278]


Notice of Meetings; International Telecommunication Advisory 
Committee (ITAC) and International Telecommunication Advisory 
Committee--Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITAC-T)

    The Department of State announces meetings of the U.S. 
International Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC), and the U.S. 
International Telecommunication Advisory Committee--Telecommunication 
Standardization (ITAC-T) National Committee. The purpose of the 
Committees is to advise the Department on policy and technical issues 
with respect to the International Telecommunication Union and 
international telecommunication standardization. Except where noted, 
meetings will be held at the Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., 
Washington, DC.
    The ITAC will meet from 10 to noon on April 26, 2000, at the 
Department of State. The agenda consists of a debrief of the meeting of 
the working group on ITU reform and planning for preparations for the 
ITU Council meeting in July 2000.
    The ITAC-T will meet from 9:30 to 4 on April 27, 2000, at the 
Telecommunication Industry Association offices on Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA, and May 17, 2000 (at a location to be determined). The 
agendas will both consist of development of recommendations for the 
ITU-T Study Programme for the next study period, positions on the 
alternative approval process, and other preparations for the June ITU 
Telecommunication Sector Advisory Group (TSAG) and the October World 
Telecommunication Sector Assembly (WTSA). We regret the short notice 
due to unanticipated schedule changes for the ITAC Chairman.
    Members of the general public may attend these meetings. Entrance 
to the Department of State is controlled; people intending to attend 
any of the ITAC meetings should send a fax to (202) 647-7407 not later 
than 24 hours before the meeting. This fax should display the name of 
the meeting (ITAC T, or US Study Group A or D, and date of meeting), 
your name, social security number, date of birth, and organizational 
affiliation. One of the following valid photo identifications will be 
required for admission: US driver's license, passport, US Government 
identification card. Enter from the C Street Lobby; in view of 
escorting requirements, non-Government attendees should plan to arrive 
not less than 15 minutes before the meeting begins. Actual room 
assignments may be determined at the lobby or by calling the 
Secretariat at 202 647-0965/2592.
    Attendees may join in the discussions, subject to the instructions 
of the Chair. Admission of members will be limited to seating 
available.

    Dated: April 19, 2000.
Julian E. Minard,
Secretariat to the ITAC-T, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-10272 Filed 4-20-00; 2:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-U
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3708

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 

relations treatment) to the products of Kazakhstan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2004

Mr. PITTS (for himself, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. PAUL, Mr. TANCREDO, and Mr. 

CROWLEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment 

(normal trade relations treatment) to the products of 

Kazakhstan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress makes the following findings: 

5 (1) Kazakhstan has been found to be in full 

6 compliance with the freedom of emigration require7 ments under title IV of the Trade Act of 1974. 
2

•HR 3708 IH 

1 (2) Since its independence from the Soviet 

2 Union in 1991, Kazakhstan has made progress to3 ward creating a free-market economy system. 

4 (3) The Department of Commerce granted 

5 Kazakhstan ‘‘market economy status’’, the first such 

6 designation of any independent state of the former 

7 Soviet Union, effective October 1, 2001. 

8 (4) Kazakhstan concluded a bilateral invest9 ment treaty with the United States in 1992. 

10 (5) Kazakhstan has demonstrated a strong de11 sire to build a friendly and cooperative relationship 

12 with the United States. 

13 (6) Kazakhstan is providing firm support in the 

14 ongoing allied campaign in Afghanistan by allowing 

15 coalition forces to use the air space of Kazakhstan 

16 and the country’s largest airport in Almaty. 

17 (7) Kazakhstan has taken an active role in the 

18 reconstruction of Iraq and is the only country in the 

19 region of Central Asia to send a military contingent 

20 of combat engineers, who have neutralized more 

21 than 300,000 explosive devices in Iraq, thereby sav22 ing thousands of lives. 

23 (8) The extension of unconditional normal trade 

24 relations treatment to the products of Kazakhstan 

25 will enable the United States to avail itself of all 
3

•HR 3708 IH 

1 rights under the World Trade Organization with re2 spect to Kazakhstan. 

3 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF 

4 THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 TO KAZAKHSTAN. 

5 (a) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATIONS AND EXTEN6 SIONS OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.—Notwith7 standing any provision of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 

8 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may—

9 (1) determine that such title should no longer 

10 apply to Kazakhstan; and 

11 (2) after making a determination under para12 graph (1) with respect to Kazakhstan, proclaim the 

13 extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal 

14 trade relations treatment) to the products of that 

15 country. 

16 (b) TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV.—

17 On and after the effective date of the extension under sub18 section (a)(2) of nondiscriminatory treatment to the prod19 ucts of Kazakhstan, title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 shall 

20 cease to apply to that country.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1047]



[[Page 2587]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Patent and Trademark Office


Meeting of the Public Advisory Committee for Trademark Affairs

AGENCY:  Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Patent and Trademark Office is announcing, in accordance 
with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 
92-463), an open meeting of the Public Advisory Committee for Trademark 
Affairs.

DATES:  The meeting will be held from 10:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. on 
Friday, February 4, 2000.

ADDRESSES:  The meeting will take place at the U.S. Patent and 
Trademark Office, Commissioner's Conference Room, 9th floor, Crystal 
Park 2, 2121 Crystal Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22202.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:  Sharon Marsh by mail marked to her 
attention and addressed to Office of the Assistant Commissioner for 
Trademarks, Patent and Trademark Office, 2900 Crystal Drive, South 
Tower Building, Suite 10B10, Arlington, VA 22202-3513; by telephone at 
(703) 308-9100, extension 45; by fax at (703) 308-9395; or by e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b3c0dbd2c1dcdd9dded2c1c0dbf3c6c0c3c7dc9dd4dcc5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="691a01081b06074704081b1a01291c1a191d06470e061f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  The meeting will be open to public 
observation. Accordingly, seating will be available to members of the 
public on a first-come-first-served basis. Members of the public will 
be permitted to make oral comments of three (3) minutes each. Written 
comments and suggestions will be accepted before or after the meeting 
on any of the matters discussed. Copies of the minutes will be 
available upon request. The agenda for the meeting will be the 
implementation of the Patent and Trademark Office Efficiency Act (Pub. 
L. 106-113, Title VI, Subtitle G).

    Dated: January 11, 2000.
Q. Todd Dickinson,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Commissioner of Patents and 
Trademarks.
[FR Doc. 00-1047 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3520-16-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Tools for Schools Training

1. Have you participated in live web training before?

Yes No

2.

Rate your PRIOR knowledge of the content of the training.

3. The information provided was useful.

4. The activities were useful and enhanced my learning.

5. The amount of time spent on EACH component of the training was adequate.

6. If you felt that the amount of time devoted to any component was not sufficient or was 

excessive, please identify it in the space below and provide and any other comments that 

would help us improve this lesson.

Evaluation of the meeting environment and the trainers

7. I was able to access the Classroom without difficulty.
8. The length of the entire session was about right.

9. I prefer web-based training, rather than classroom-based training with a live trainer.

10. I prefer classroom-based training with a live trainer.

11. The trainers were knowledgeable about the subject matter.

12. The materials aided my learning.

13. Rate your knowledge of the content of the training after completing the course.

14. Please provide any other comments or suggestions you have about how this and 

future training courses may be improved.
§ 121.443 Pilot in command qualification: Route and airports. ( a ) Each certificate holder shall provide a system acceptable to the Administrator for disseminating the information required by paragraph (b) of this section to the pilot in command and appropriate flight operation personnel. The system must also provide an acceptable means for showing compliance with § 121.445.
( b ) No certificate holder may use any person, nor may any person serve, as pilot in command unless the certificate holder has provided that person current information concerning the following subjects pertinent to the areas over which that person is to serve, and to each airport and terminal area into which that person is to operate, and ensures that that person has adequate knowledge of, and the ability to use, the information: ( 1 ) Weather characteristics appropriate to the season.
( 2 ) Navigation facilities.
( 3 ) Communication procedures, including airport visual aids.
( 4 ) Kinds of terrain and obstructions.
( 5 ) Minimum safe flight levels.
( 6 ) En route and terminal area arrival and departure procedures, holding procedures and authorized instrument approach procedures for the airports involved.
( 7 ) Congested areas and physical layout of each airport in the terminal area in which the pilot will operate.
( 8 ) Notices to Airmen.
[Doc. No. 17897, 45 FR 41594, June 19, 1980; Amdt. 121-159, 45 FR 43154, June 26, 1980]