alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21

                            Significant Subsidiaries


                                                                   Name under
                                              State or other    which subsidiary
                                             jurisdiction of        conducts
         Name of Subsidiary                   incorporation         business
         ------------------                   -------------         --------

Isogen International, LLC                        Delaware             Same

Innodata India (Private) Limited                  India               Same

Innodata XML Content Factory, Inc.             Philippines            Same

ESS Manufacturing Company, Inc.                Philippines            Same

Content Online Services, Inc.                  Philippines            Same

Innodata Asia Holdings, Limited                  Bermuda              Same

Innodata Lanka (Private) Limited                Sri Lanka             Same
# Boa rd of County Commiss i oners

HENRY A. SCHNABEL FI RST DISTRICT RON COOK SECOND DISTRICT WENDY BUXTON·ANDRAOE THIRD DISTRICT November 10, 2015 Randall S . Fiertz, Director Office o f Airport Compliance and Ma n agement Ana l ysis 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington , DC 20591 

## Prowers Coun ty 301 South Main , Suite 215 Lamar , Colorado 81052-2857 (719) 336 - 8025 FAX: (719) 336-2255

RE : A ct ion P l an Regard in g Ta x Revenue from Aviat ion Fuel for L ocal G ove rnment Dear M r . Fiertz: JANA COEN CLERK TO THE BOARD REGINA JO OORENKAMP COUNTY AOMINISTRA TOR JOHN LEFFEROINK COUNTY ATIORNEY

This is to com p ly with the FAA ' s rece nt request for an Action Plan regarding the collection of revenue from aviation fuel for local government. We have two (2) airpo rt s located in Prowers County we collect revenue d e r ived from the sales of aviation fuel. Effective January 1 , 2016 P rowers County will transfer the sales tax revenue associated with aviatio n fuel to the Coun ty' s Road and Bridge Fund on an annual basis and will use said revenue for the purpose of maint aining a nd keeping clear access to roads (see attached maps) which service our airports . Sincerely , Prowers Cou nty Board of County Commissioners



# ~PROWERS COUNTY ACCESS MAPS '";) Iii] 

## \ 

## •

...... [!o,

**~,** l!!l

**~ ~I**  

### ' iu] 

# .

**._...~**

# . .. 1_,....,...


# ..

**~-** lil f -•t.,. ' I lll.lf(fi'Wf'W. I OoMto 

# . .

**~** 

### ·-C»>tt......... 

## .s ,_ 

### • 

# ·-· ·· • 1!1 o. ... •u t •ll 

### ....

., ,

(!>)



## ...



# .. .... Co .... 

### , 

# ..... ...

# .... ..

# .... 

# ...... 

# . ... ,
###### Editorial Note on Part 741

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 741 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 741.218 Involuntary liquidation and creditor claims.

Any credit union which is insured pursuant to title II of the Act shall adhere to the applicable provisions in part 709 of this chapter. Section 709.3 of this chapter applies only to federal credit unions.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas DAmbrosio, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Perry Ellis International, Inc. on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Perry Ellis International, Inc.



|               |  |                                                          
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|April 18, 2008
|               | 
|By:            |  | /s/ Thomas DAmbrosio                                    
|Name:          |  | Thomas DAmbrosio                                        
|Title:         |  | Interim Chief Financial Officer (Chief Financial
Officer)
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 6

- 00 203

- C V



### ____________________

ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.

, Appellant

V.

DENNIS DEEN CHARTERS AND CATHY CHARTERS, INDIVIDUALLY

AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF DENNIS

WADE CHARTERS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 60th Di strict Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. B

- 196,107

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

The appellant, Entergy Arkansas , Inc., filed a motion to stay the trial during

the pendency of its interlocutory appeal from an order denying a special

appearance

. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.01 4(a)(7) (West Supp.

201 5 ). When an appeal from an interlocutory order is perfected, we may make

such orders as are necessary to preserve the parties’ rights until disposition of the

appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 29.3. After reviewing the m otion and the response , we find2 that temporary orders are necessary to preserve the parties’ rights until disposition

of the appeal.

It is ORDERED that the trial of Cause No. B

- 196,107 is STAYED until our

Opinion issues or until further order of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 29.3

.

ORDER ENTERED July 21 , 2016

.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3614 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3614

 To ensure that the national instant criminal background check system 
   provides the Federal Bureau of Investigation with information on 
 approved firearms transfers to persons named in the Violent Gang and 
                      Terrorist Organization File.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2003

Mr. King of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure that the national instant criminal background check system 
   provides the Federal Bureau of Investigation with information on 
 approved firearms transfers to persons named in the Violent Gang and 
                      Terrorist Organization File.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FBI ACCESS TO NICS INFORMATION ON APPROVED FIREARMS 
              TRANSFERS TO PERSONS NAMED IN THE VIOLENT GANG AND 
              TERRORIST ORGANIZATION FILE.

    Section 103 of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. 
922 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(l) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Attorney 
General shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to ensure 
that, if the system established under this section is contacted by a 
licensee for information on whether receipt of a firearm by an 
individual whose name appears in the Violent Gang and Terrorist 
Organization File maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation 
would violate subsection (g) or (n) of section 922 of title 18, United 
States Code, or State law, and the information available to the system 
does not demonstrate that the receipt would be such a violation, the 
system shall preserve all records of the system with respect to the 
individual and the prospective transaction until the system has 
provided the records to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 794.140 Employment.

No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-14 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24035-14 Filed:04/19/23 Entered:04/19/23 22:37:35 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Annual
Report Form 10-K as of December 31, 1997, Consolidated Financial Statements, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            9973
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2652
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       1687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6647
<PP&E>                                          477280
<DEPRECIATION>                                  144653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  470695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            22336
<BONDS>                                         220765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           309
<OTHER-SE>                                      211324
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    470695
<SALES>                                         306313
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                287821
<CGS>                                           118020
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   213220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               23096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  51505
<INCOME-TAX>                                     18139
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              33366
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (964)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     32402
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
        

</TABLE>
H. R. 3740 

One Hundred Eighth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 223 South 

Main Street in Roxboro, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Oscar Scott Woody Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

223 South Main Street in Roxboro, North Carolina, shall be known 

and designated as the ‘‘Oscar Scott Woody Post Office Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Oscar Scott 

Woody Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate. 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-199-000]

Take notice that the technical conference scheduled for Tuesday, May 2, 2000, at 9:30 am, has been canceled. The conference will be rescheduled at a later date.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10473  Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 21-5066 September Term, 2020

1:20-cv-02204-UNA

Filed On: July 14, 2021

David McConnell,

Appellant

v.

Michael Carvajal, Director, Bureau of Prisons,

Appellee

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Pillard, Wilkins, and Rao, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed October 26,

2020, and December 22, 2020, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed

appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus for failure to state a claim on which relief may

be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); Walpin v. Corp. for Nat’l & Cmty. Servs.,

630 F.3d 184, 186-88 (D.C. Cir. 2011). Moreover, the district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying reconsideration. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e); Firestone v. Firestone,

76 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Specifically, appellant has not

demonstrated that the district court erred in concluding that the Freedom of Information

Act (“FOIA”) provides him with an alternative avenue to obtain the information he seeks.

Accordingly, appellant has not satisfied his burden to demonstrate that “there is no

other adequate remedy available to [him].” Power v. Barnhart, 292 F.3d 781, 784 (D.C.

Cir. 2002) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). Finally, appellant has not

shown that the district court improperly dismissed the case sua sponte without providing

leave to amend. See Rollins v. Wackenhut Servs., Inc., 703 F.3d 122, 127 (D.C. Cir.

2012) (district court may dismiss a claim without notice “where it is patently obvious that

the plaintiff cannot possibly prevail based on the facts alleged in the complaint.”)

(citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 21-5066 September Term, 2020

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
###### Editorial Note on Subpart I of Part 121

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart I of part 121 appear at 60 FR 65928, Dec. 20, 1995.

#### § 121.205 Nontransport category airplanes: Landing limitations: Alternate airport.

No person may list an airport as an alternate airport in a dispatch or flight release for a nontransport category airplane unless that airplane (at the weight anticipated at the time of arrival) based on the assumptions contained in § 121.203, can be brought to a full stop landing within 70 percent of the effective length of the runway.
#### Morris Temerson, Appellant, *v.*Louis Grau et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

December, 1900.)

Conversion — Will not lie against one out of possession and control of the thing converted.

Where payees, in lawful possession of a check on a bank, transfer it for value to another and he retains it after payment has been refused, the maker’s subsequent payment of the debt to the payees does not entitle him to maintain conversion against them for the check, as they have lawfully parted with the possession and control ÓT it.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Oourt of the city of ETew York, borough of Manhattan.

Louis Levy, for appellant.

Isidor Cohn, for respondents.

Beekman, P. J.

This action is brought for the conversion of .a check. The trial justice awarded judgment in favor of the defendants, dismissing the complaint upon the merits. In some respects there was a sharp conflict of evidence which, from the nature -of the judgment, it must he assumed that the court below resolved in a manner most favorable to the defendants. It is not disputed that when the check was delivered by the plaintiff to the defend.ants it represented a sum of money 'that was due from him to the latter. Immediately upon receipt of the same the defendants in-domed it over to one Levy in payment of an equivalent sum, for *472which, they were indebted to him. Levy thereupon presented the check to the hank upon which it was drawn for payment, which wias refused on the ground that the plaintiff’s account [was not good for any such sum. Apparently, thereafter, the check continued to remain in the possession of Hr. Levy. The contention on the part of the plaintiff is that he subsequently paid the amount of the same to the defendants, but failed at the time to secure its return to him,. He testifies that he subsequently demanded its return by the defendants without success. It is obvious upon this state of facts that no conversion was established. The defendants were originally in lawful possession of the check, and were' acting entirely within their rights in transferring it to Levy, who apparently continued to- he the owner and in possession of the same up to the time of the trial. As the defendants ceased to have any possession of or control over the check, after it had been lawfully transferred by them to Levy, a condition which apparently existed at the time that the plaintiff’s demand was made, it is plain that none of the elements essential to support an action for conversion existed at the time this action was brought. The decision of the trial justice was, therefore, right aud must he affirmed.

Giegebich and O’Gormam, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Ralph C. Guild, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) (Intentionally omitted)



c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    RALPH C. GUILD                            
|                   |  |  |  | Ralph C. Guild                                   
|                   |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
# Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the
Annual Report of Department 56, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the period ended January 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy J. Schugel,
the Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)    
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |                                                                        |                          | 
|---------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | 
|Date:   March 17, 2004 |                                                                        | /s/   Timothy J. Schugel
|                       |                                                                       
|                       | Timothy J. SchugelChief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President

---