alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 121.383 Airman: Limitations on use of services. ( a ) No certificate holder may use any person as an airman nor may any person serve as an airman unless that person— ( 1 ) Holds an appropriate current airman certificate issued by the FAA;
( 2 ) Has in his or her possession while engaged in operations under this part— ( i ) Any required appropriate current airman and medical certificates; or
( ii ) A temporary document issued in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section; and
( 3 ) Is otherwise qualified for the operation for which he is to be used.
( b ) Each airman covered by paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall present his or her certificates or temporary document for inspection upon request of the Administrator.
( c ) A certificate holder may obtain approval to provide a temporary document verifying a flightcrew member's airman certificate and medical certificate privileges under an approved certificate verification plan set forth in the certificate holder's operations specifications. A document provided by the certificate holder may be carried as an airman certificate or medical certificate on flights within the United States for up to 72 hours.
( d ) No certificate holder may use the services of any person as a pilot on an airplane engaged in operations under this part if that person has reached his or her 65th birthday.
( e ) No pilot may serve as a pilot in operations under this part if that person has reached his or her 65th birthday.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19212, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-144, 43 FR 22646, May 25, 1978; Amdt. 121-344, 74 FR 34234, July 15, 2009; Amdt. 121-372, 80 FR 33401, June 12, 2015; Amdt. 121-381, 83 FR 30282, June 27, 2018]
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- Hewlett-Packard Company Under Contract No. GS-35F-4663G

Delivery OrderNos. B301, B302 APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 57940, 57941

James D. Bachman, Esq. Ron R. Hutchinson, Esq.

Doyle & Bachman, LLP Arlington, VA Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Ildiko E. Szentkiralyi, JA

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The appeals have been settled. Accordingly, they are dismissed from the Board's docket with prejudice. Dated: 29 April 2014

minist ive Judge ed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 57940, 57941, Appeals of Hewlett-Packard Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
Registration Statements of Post Properties, Inc. of our reports dated March 15,
2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule,
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
Post Properties, Inc., which appears in this Form 10-K:

Form S-3 (No. 33-81772)
Form S-3 (No. 333-47399)
Form S-3 (No. 333-80427)
Form S-3 (No. 333-44722)
Form S-8 (No. 333-62243)
Form S-8 (No. 33-00020)
Form S-8 (No. 333-94121)
Form S-8 (No. 333-38725)
Form S-8 (No. 333-02374)
Form S-8 (No. 333-107092)
Form S-8 (No. 333-107093)
Form S-8 (No. 333-125390)



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 15, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<CIK>          0000796502
<NAME>         WESTERBEKE CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-25-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-25-1997
<CASH>                                          55,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,448,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                    62,800
<INVENTORY>                                  6,310,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,450,600
<PP&E>                                       5,240,700
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,277,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,991,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,349,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,200
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,908,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,991,000
<SALES>                                      5,194,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,194,600
<CGS>                                        4,101,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,101,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               966,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                161,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                    73,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             88,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    88,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 791.21 Rule of construction.

Appendix A to this subpart does not alter the legal status of guidance that is authorized by statute, including but not limited to 12 U.S.C. 1781, 1786, and 1789, to create binding legal obligations.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk March 4, 2013

h 0225 

# Order

March 4, 2013

145425

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145425

COA: 302381

Ingham CC: 10

- 000515

- FH

JAYSON JAMAR HOLT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 3, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is c onsidered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

V IVIANO

, J., not participating.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2404]

Petitions for Reconsideration  have been filed in the Commission's rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR section 1.429(e). The full text of these documents are available for viewing and copying in Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to this petition must be filed by May 10, 2000. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.

*Subject:*                     1998 Biennial Regulatory Review—Amendment of Part 97 of the Commission's Amateur Service Rules. (WT Docket No. 98-143).                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     7.                

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10223  Filed 4-24-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
Order entered November 13, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 00506 - CV FITNESS EVOLUTION, L . P . , ET AL . , Appellant s V. HEADHUNTER FITNESS, LLC, ET AL . , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429 - 00529 - 2010 

### O RDER We GRANT appellants’/cross

- appellees’ unopposed November 11, 2013 motion for an extension of time to file a combined reply and cross

- appellees’ brief. Appellants shall file their combined reply and cross

- appellees’ bri ef on or before January 16, 2014
. /s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24866]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS 
Initial Review Group, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research 
Review Committee.
    Date: November 13, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Erica L. Brown, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 
7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2639, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#593c3b2b362e3719373038303d77373031773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d181f0f120a133d13141c141953131415531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 8, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-24866 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Editorial Note on Part 11
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

§ 11.81 What information must I include in my petition for an exemption? You must include the following information in your petition for an exemption and submit it to FAA as soon as you know you need an exemption. ( a ) Your name and mailing address and, if you wish, other contact information such as a fax number, telephone number, or e-mail address;
( b ) The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek an exemption;
( c ) The extent of relief you seek, and the reason you seek the relief;
( d ) The reasons why granting your request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole;
( e ) The reasons why granting the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek the exemption;
( f ) A summary we can publish in the Federal Register, stating: ( 1 ) The rule from which you seek the exemption; and
( 2 ) A brief description of the nature of the exemption you seek;
( g ) Any additional information, views or arguments available to support your request; and
( h ) If you want to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside the United States, the reason why you need to do so.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3672

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act, as added by 

the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act 

of 2003, to provide for negotiation of fair prices for Medicare prescription 

drugs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2003

Mr. EDWARDS (for himself, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. HOYER, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. BERRY, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. STARK, Mr. 

SPRATT, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. WAXMAN, 

Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. OBEY, Mr. BISHOP of New York, 

Mr. MOORE, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. BELL, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. DAVIS of 

Tennessee, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. FROST, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. 

HINOJOSA, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. ROSS, Mrs. MCCARTHY

of New York, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. ACKERMAN, Ms. WATERS, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. 

HOEFFEL, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. WEINER, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. SANDLIN, 

Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Ms. LINDA

T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Ms. 

MCCOLLUM, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. MAJETTE, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. 

MCNULTY, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. LYNCH, Ms. KILPATRICK, 

Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. KLECZKA, Ms. 

NORTON, Mr. OLVER, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. OWENS, Mr. 

UDALL of New Mexico, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. 

BALLANCE, Mr. CASE, Ms. SOLIS, Mr. COOPER, Mr. EMANUEL, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. SCHIFF, and 

Mr. MEEK of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 
2

•HR 3672 IH 

A BILL

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security 

Act, as added by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, to provide 

for negotiation of fair prices for Medicare prescription 

drugs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NEGOTIATING FAIR PRICES FOR MEDICARE 

4 PRESCRIPTION DRUGS. 

5 Section 1860D–11 of the Social Security Act, as 

6 added by section 101(a) of the Medicare Prescription 

7 Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, is 

8 amended by striking subsection (i) (relating to noninter9 ference) and by inserting the following: 

10 ‘‘(i) AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE PRICES WITH MAN11 UFACTURERS.—In order to ensure that beneficiaries en12 rolled under prescription drug plans and MA–PD plans 

13 pay the lowest possible price, the Secretary shall have au14 thority similar to that of other Federal entities that pur15 chase prescription drugs in bulk to negotiate contracts 

16 with manufacturers of covered part D drugs, consistent 

17 with the requirements and in furtherance of the goals of 

18 providing quality care and containing costs under this 

19 part.’’.

Æ
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3726

To authorize the grant program under which the Secretary of Homeland 

Security makes discretionary grants for use in high-threat, high-density 

urban areas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 21, 2004

Mr. WEINER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To authorize the grant program under which the Secretary 

of Homeland Security makes discretionary grants for 

use in high-threat, high-density urban areas, and for 

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Targeting Homeland Secu5 rity Resources Effectively Against Terrorism Act of 2004’’ 

6 or the ‘‘THREAT Act’’. 
2

•HR 3726 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROGRAM OF GRANTS FOR USE IN HIGH-THREAT, 

2 HIGH-DENSITY URBAN AREAS. 

3 (a) GRANT PROGRAM.—From amounts made avail4 able to the Secretary of Homeland Security for discre5 tionary grants for use in high-threat, high-density urban 

6 areas, the Secretary shall carry out a program under 

7 which the Secretary makes such grants in accordance with 

8 this section. 

9 (b) MAXIMUM NUMBER OF GRANTEES.—For any fis10 cal year, the Secretary may award such grants to not more 

11 than 15 such areas. 

12 (c) FACTORS CONSIDERED.—In determining wheth13 er, and in what allocation, to award such a grant to such 

14 an area, the Secretary shall consider the following three 

15 factors: 

16 (1) The population of that urban area. 

17 (2) The presence of critical infrastructure in 

18 that urban area. 

19 (3) The credibility of the threat to that urban 

20 area. 

21 (d) WEIGHT OF FACTORS.—In considering the fac22 tors required by subsection (c), the Secretary shall give 

23 the factor described in subsection (c)(2) two times the 

24 weight given the factor described in subsection (c)(1), and 

25 shall give the factor described in subsection (c)(3) three 
3

•HR 3726 IH 

1 times the weight given the factor described in subsection 

2 (c)(1). 

3 (e) DEFINITION OF FACTORS.—The Secretary shall, 

4 for purposes of this section, define the factors required 

5 by subsection (c). In defining the factor described in sub6 section (c)(1), the Secretary shall ensure that tourists and 

7 commuters are considered as part of the population. 

8 (f) DISBURSEMENT DIRECTLY TO LOCALITIES.—All 

9 amounts awarded to an area under this section shall be 

10 disbursed directly to one or more local governments within 

11 the area.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.301 Scope. The rules and procedures set forth in this subpart are applicable to informal proceedings conducted by the NCUA Board, or a Presiding Officer designated by the Board, pursuant to section 206(i) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1786(i)), to suspend, remove and/or prohibit from office or from further participation any institution-affiliated party of an insured credit union who: ( a ) Is charged in a state, Federal or territorial information or indictment or complaint with committing or participating in a crime involving dishonesty or breach of trust, which crime is punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year under state or Federal law; or
( b ) Enters a pretrial diversion or other similar program as result of being charged in such information or indictment or complaint with participating or committing such crime; or
( c ) Is convicted of such crime.
Subpart A of this part does not apply to proceedings under this subpart. [56 FR 37767, Aug. 8, 1991; 57 FR 523, Jan. 7, 1992]
#### Belfor *v.*Belfor.

Atkinson, J.

1. The application to which the demurrer was interposed was in substance an application to amend the original petition for divorce, alimony, and custody of the child, and the judgment excepted to should be construed as disallowing the amendment in part and allowing it in so far as relates to temporary alimony. The order is not such a final judgment as, under the Civil Code, § 6138, may be brought to this court by a bill of exceptions while the case is pending in the trial court. The bills of exceptions will therefore be dismissed as having been prematurely obtained. *Jackson*v. *Green,*58 *Ga.*460; *Burkhalter*v. *Roach,*145 *Ga.*834 (90 S. E. 52); *MacDonell*v. *South Georgia Live Stock Corporation,*152 *Ga.*475 (110 S. E. 227).

2. Leave is granted, however, under the special facts of the case, to each plaintiff in error to treat the official copy of each bill of exceptions, of *695file in tlie trial court, as exceptions pendente lite. *Morris*v. *General Motors Acceptance Corp.,*175 *Ga.*436 (165 S. E. 103).

Nos. 8719, 8755.

September 14, 1932.

*Writs of error dismissed, %oith direction.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*696
      *H. W. McLarly,*for plaintiff.

*Everett & Everett*and *Roy S.*Drennan, for defendant.
Exhibit 32 (ii)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the
quarter ended September 30, 2004, I, J. Robert Buchanan, Treasurer (Principal
Financial Officer) of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

        (2)the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.



/s/ J. ROBERT BUCHANAN
------------------------
J. Robert Buchanan
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
§ 617.7510 What should the qualified lender do when it receives notice of a distressed loan restructuring directive? ( a ) A qualified lender should respond to the notice by stating why FCA should not issue a distressed loan restructuring directive, by proposing changes to the directive, or by seeking other suitable relief. The response must include any information, documentation, or other relevant evidence that supports the qualified lender's position. The response may include a plan for achieving compliance with the distressed loan restructuring requirements of the Act. The response must be in writing and delivered to FCA within 30 days after the date on which the qualified lender received the notice. In its discretion, FCA may extend the time period for good cause. FCA may shorten the 30-day period with the consent of the qualified lender or when FCA determines that providing the full 30 days would result in a borrower not receiving distressed loan restructuring rights.
( b ) If the qualified lender fails to respond within 30 days or such other time period specified by FCA, this failure will constitute a waiver of any objections to the proposed distressed loan restructuring directive.