alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3686

To authorize the Economic Development Administration to make grants to 

producers of taconite for implementation of new technologies to increase 

productivity, to reduce costs, and to improve overall product quality 

and performance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2003

Mr. OBERSTAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To authorize the Economic Development Administration to 

make grants to producers of taconite for implementation 

of new technologies to increase productivity, to reduce 

costs, and to improve overall product quality and performance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taconite Research Act 

5 of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 3686 IH 

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

2 Congress finds that—

3 (1) maintaining our Nation’s domestic steel in4 dustry is essential to a peacetime or wartime econ5 omy and critical to our national defense; 

6 (2) about 98 percent of taconite is used in the 

7 iron and steel industry; 

8 (3) taconite is the principal iron ore mined in 

9 the United States; 

10 (4) Minnesota’s iron ore mining industry is 

11 vital to the State’s economy, is ranked 8th nationally 

12 in total nonfuel mineral production, and employs ap13 proximately 4,000 people; 

14 (5) Minnesota’s taconite production has de15 creased by 14,000,000 metric tons since 1998; 

16 (6) Northeastern Minnesota, which is heavily 

17 dependent on the taconite industry that needs new 

18 technologies, has at least 100 years of those reserves 

19 that can be economically produced; and 

20 (7) the Natural Resources Research Institute of 

21 the University of Minnesota has developed improve22 ments based on new technologies that taconite pro23 ducing companies can implement, which will reduce 

24 production costs, improve the quality of taconite pel25 lets, and produce a value-added high iron ore con26 tent commodity. 
3

•HR 3686 IH 

1 SEC. 3. GRANT AUTHORITY. 

2 The Economic Development Administration is au3 thorized to make grants to producers of taconite to imple4 ment new technologies to increase productivity, to reduce 

5 costs, and to improve overall product quality and perform6 ance. 

7 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

8 There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 

9 this Act $100,000,000. Such sums shall remain authorized 

10 until expended.

Æ
This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is

made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the 

accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for individual

or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended

by BLM. This map may not meet National Map Accuracy 

Standards. This product was developed through digital

means and information may be updated without notification.

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2

Miles

Allen Road

Frey

Opp Road

T

4

N

36 31 36

Heag Road

1 6 1

South Fork Crooked

Creek

T

3

N

Oswald Road

Birkley Road

Sidell Road

Buffalo Springs Ranch Roads

Peterson Road

Buffalo Springs Ranch Roads

R25E

Route information and proposed management actions in this 

document only apply to Bureau of Land Management lands.

No route designations will be made on non-federal or private lands.

 The information on this map is developed from a variety of

 data sources and input scales may cause some misalignment of 

data layers. This map is for planning purposes only, and not 

intended for on-ground travel. 1:24,000

Wyoming

R24E

Location Map

Montana

Billings 

Field 

Office

±

Legend

Recommended Routes

Closed to All Vehicles: 1.5 Miles

Open with Restrictions - Conditional: 7.1 Miles

Roads

Streams

Lakes

Bureau of Land Management

Public Lands Survey System

Division of State Lands

Private 

Acton Travel Management Area

Acton Travel Management Area 

Alternative A

Map 115

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
Exhibit 31.1Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification I, Arnie Geller, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, INC.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedurespresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 

 
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: July 13, 2006/s/ Arnie Geller Arnie Geller,
#### § 621.1 Purpose and applicability.

This part sets forth accounting and reporting requirements to be followed by all banks, associations, and service corporations chartered under the Act; the Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation; and, where specifically indicated, the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. The requirements set forth in this part are of both general and specific applicability. Certain requirements focus on areas of financial condition and operating performance that are of special importance for generating, presenting, and disclosing accurate and reliable information.

[58 FR 48786, Sept. 20, 1993, as amended at 78 FR 31835, May 28, 2013]
§ 121.617 Alternate airport for departure. ( a ) If the weather conditions at the airport of takeoff are below the landing minimums in the certificate holder's operations specifications for that airport, no person may dispatch or release an aircraft from that airport unless the dispatch or flight release specifies an alternate airport located within the following distances from the airport of takeoff: ( 1 ) *Aircraft having two engines.* Not more than one hour from the departure airport at normal cruising speed in still air with one engine inoperative.
( 2 ) *Aircraft having three or more engines.* Not more than two hours from the departure airport at normal cruising speed in still air with one engine inoperative.
( b ) For the purpose of paragraph (a) of this section, the alternate airport weather conditions must meet the requirements of the certificate holder's operations specifications.
( c ) No person may dispatch or release an aircraft from an airport unless he lists each required alternate airport in the dispatch or flight release.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24182-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 13:45:23 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24182-1 Filed:05/10/23 Entered:05/10/23 13:45:23 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 2
#### § 103.19 Operations in prohibited or restricted areas.

No person may operate an ultralight vehicle in prohibited or restricted areas unless that person has permission from the using or controlling agency, as appropriate.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

I, Thomas G. Mair, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of Golden Star Resources Ltd., certify, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of theAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 of Golden Star Resources Ltd. that: 

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained andincorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Golden Star Resources Ltd. 

/s/ Thomas G. Mair 

 

Thomas G. Mair 

Interim President and Chief Executive Officer 

February 27, 2008
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “the Report”) of
Clearfield, Inc. a Minnesota corporation. (the “Company”), for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
that, to his knowledge




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






May
      11, 2009
              
              /s/
      Bruce G. BlackeyBruce
      G. Blackey, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized
    Officer)












































22
#### § 103.21 Visual reference with the surface.

No person may operate an ultralight vehicle except by visual reference with the surface.
exv4w13



 



Exhibit 4.13


Unofficial Translation



R.L. de Bakker

Oranjelaan 7

2243 HG Wassenaar



	 	 	 
	Bilthoven, December 19, 2000	 	
B0033adp/tv



Dear Mr. de Bakker



In continuation of our recent
conversations I do herewith confirm the agreement
we reached concerning the start of your employment with ASM International N.V.
as per January 1, 2001 in the capacity of Chief Financial Officer.


The scope and responsibilities of this position have been discussed with you and
are as such known to you. During the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
of May 23 of this year it will be proposed to appoint you as Member of the Board
of Management of ASMI.


The following conditions will apply:


Salary

Your fixed salary will be NLG 450.000 (Translators Note : Equals — Euro
204.300)


Bonus plan

An annually determined bonus of maximum 30% of the fixed salary will be
applicable.


Stock Option Plan

At the start of your employment you are eligible for 35.000 options under the
rules of the Plan and according to the enclosed option letter. These options
can be exercised over a 5 year period. The exercise price will be the price of
our shares on the day that you sign the letter. After receipt of your signed
contract we will confirm the contract.


 






 


General requlations

As discussed the general ASM regulations regarding insurances and pensions
will be applicable to you.

Enclosed you will find an overview of our general employment conditions.


Unless otherwise agreed a mutual notice period of 6 months will be applicable.


Enclosed you will also find a draft press release concerning the start of your
employment. Your possible comments will be appreciated.


The above is a short confirmation of
our conversations.

We are convinced that you can provide an important contribution to the further
financial strengthening of our company in the coming years and wish you much
success.


With kind regards



	 	 	 
	ASM INTERNATIONAL N.V.	 	


Signed for Agreement
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Arthur H. del Prado	 	
/s/ R.L. de Bakker
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 26, 2012 

h0319 

Order 

 

March 26, 2012 

143860 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143860 

 COA: 300874 

Wayne CC: 06-007508-01 

DEANDRE STEVEN HENRY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 30, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

HATHAWAY, J., not participating. Justice Hathaway recuses herself and will not 

participate in this case as she was the presiding trial court judge. See MCR 2.003(B).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

National Transportation Safety Board.

# TIME AND DATE:

9:30 a.m., Wednesday, May 3, 2000.

# PLACE:

NTSB Board Room, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW, Washington, DC 20594.

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

5299F “Most Wanted” Safety Recommendation Program Status Report and Suggested Modifications.

7256 Special Investigation Report: Actions to Reduce Fatalities, Injuries, and Crashes Involving the Hard Core Drinking Driver.

# NEWS MEDIA CONTRACT:

Telephone: (202) 314-6100.

Individuals requesting specific accommodation should contact Mrs. Barbara Bush at (202) 314-6220 by Friday April 28, 2000.

# CONTRACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Rhonda Underwood (202) 314-6065.

April 21, 2000.

Rhonda Underwood,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-10441  Filed 4-21-00; 3:38 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
§ 380.35 Determination of claims. ( a ) *In general.* The Corporation as receiver shall allow any claim received by the receiver on or before the claims bar date if such claim is proved to the satisfaction of the receiver. Except as provided in 12 U.S.C. 5390(a)(3)(D)(iii), the Corporation as receiver may disallow any portion of any claim by a creditor or claim of a security, preference, setoff, or priority which is not proved to the satisfaction of the receiver.
( b ) *Disallowance of claims filed after the claims bar date.* ( 1 ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, any claim filed after the claims bar date shall be disallowed, and such disallowance shall be final, as provided by 12 U.S.C. 5390(a)(3)(C)(i).
( 2 ) *Certain exceptions.* Paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall not apply with respect to any claim filed by a claimant after the claims bar date and such claim shall be considered by the receiver if: ( i ) The claimant did not receive notice of the appointment of the receiver in time to file such claim before the claims bar date, or the claim is based upon an act or omission of the Corporation as receiver that occurs after the claims bar date has passed, and
( ii ) The claim is filed in time to permit payment. A claim is “filed in time to permit payment” when it is filed before a final distribution is made by the receiver.
#### Eldis Barnett, *Appellant,*v. J. M. Bell and Others, *Appellees.*

Opinion Filed May 6, 1913.

The refusal of a temporary injunction against a judicial sale at which a party was purchaser will not be reversed where probable laches appear, and the application was presented on the eve of the sale.

Appealed from the Circuit Court of Walton County.

Order affirmed.

TF. *T. Bludworth,*for Appellant;

*8. K. GilUs,*for Appellees.

Cockrell, J.

This is an appeal from an order, dated February 8, 1913, denying an application for a temporary injunction against a judicial sale of realty advertised for the third day of said month. The order recites that the application was made on the first day of the month, but is silent as to what matters were before the court upon the application. It does appear by subsequent recitation in the transcript that there was before the court a showing iliat a bill setting up the same facts and with the same prayer for injunction had but recently been dismissed for lack of prosecution, whether without prejudice or not we are not informed.

Appellant’s brief advises us that the sale took place as advertised; the property was bought in by a party to this bill, who has been enjoined temporarily from enforcing his deed, as against this appellant who continues in pos*414session. If this he true, it but emphasizes the impropriety of our deciding the moot question now sought to be presented, seeing that our decision either way could in no wise alter the effect of the interlocutory order now before us.

The equity of the bill has not been passed upon by the Circuit Court, so far as we are definitely advised. The failure to prosecute the first bill of complaint, and the unexplained delay in presenting the application for a temporary injunction until the eve of the sale, published notice of which must have been running for several weeks at least, are sufficient to prevent our interference with the discretion judicially invested in the- Circuit Judge in such matters.

Order affirmed.

Shackleford, C. J., and Taylor, Hocker and Whit-f|eld, J. J., concur.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3417

To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit the operation in certain 

metropolitan areas of civil subsonic turbojets that fail to comply with 

stage 3 noise levels. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2003

Mr. ROTHMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit the operation in certain metropolitan areas of civil subsonic turbojets that fail to comply with stage 3 noise levels.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aircraft Noise Reduc5 tion Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AIRCRAFT NOISE REDUCTION IN CERTAIN METRO7 POLITAN AREAS. 

8 Section 47528 of title 49, United States Code, is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 
2

•HR 3417 IH 

1 ‘‘(h) SPECIAL RULE FOR AIRPORTS IN CERTAIN

2 METROPOLITAN AREAS.—Notwithstanding any other pro3 vision of law, no person may operate after the date of en4 actment of this subsection any civil subsonic turbojet that 

5 fails to comply with stage 3 noise levels to or from an 

6 airport located in any of the 20 most populated metropoli7 tan areas in the United States, as determined by the Sec8 retary.’’.

Æ
§ 650.10 Voluntary liquidation. ( a ) The Corporation may voluntarily liquidate by a resolution of its board of directors, but only with the consent of, and in accordance with a plan of liquidation approved by, the Farm Credit Administration Board. Upon adoption of such resolution, the Corporation shall submit the resolution and proposed voluntary liquidation plan to the Farm Credit Administration Board for preliminary approval. The Farm Credit Administration Board, in its discretion, may appoint a receiver as part of an approved liquidation plan. If a receiver is appointed for the Corporation as part of a voluntary liquidation, the receivership shall be conducted pursuant to the regulations of this part, except to the extent that an approved plan of liquidation provides otherwise.
( b ) If the Farm Credit Administration Board gives preliminary approval to the liquidation plan, the board of directors of the Corporation shall submit the resolution to liquidate to the stockholders for a vote in accordance with the bylaws of the Corporation.
( c ) The Farm Credit Administration Board will consider final approval of the resolution to voluntarily liquidate and the liquidation plan after an affirmative stockholder vote on the resolution.
#### § 810.3 Payment at maturity.

Each FFB bill will be paid in its face amount at maturity upon presentation and surrender to any Federal Reserve Bank or Branch or to the Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Public Debt, Securities Transaction Branch, Washington, DC 20226. If a FFB bill is presented and surrendered for redemption after it has become overdue, the Federal Financing Bank may require satisfactory proof of ownership, as provided in § 306.25 of Department of the Treasury Circular No. 300, current revision.