alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21799-4 Filed:08/08/22 Entered:08/09/22 17:04:16 D

Exhibit Page 1 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21799-4 Filed:08/08/22 Entered:08/09/22 17:04:16 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21799-4 Filed:08/08/22 Entered:08/09/22 17:04:16 Desc:

Exhibit Page 3 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21799-4 Filed:08/08/22 Entered:08/09/22 17:04:16 Desc:

Exhibit Page 4 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21799-4 Filed:08/08/22 Entered:08/09/22 17:04:16 Desc:

Exhibit Page 5 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:21799-4 Filed:08/08/22 Entered:08/09/22 17:04:16 Desc:

Exhibit Page 6 of 6
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3721 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3721

  To amend title 49, United States Code, to repeal the essential air 
                  service local participation program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 2004

Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Berry, Mr. Sanders, Mr. 
Acevedo-Vila, Mr. Paul, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Shuster, Mr. Case, Mr. Hoeffel, 
Mr. Pearce, Mr. Michaud, Mr. Renzi, Mr. Boyd, Mr. Latham, Mr. Boozman, 
Mr. Moran of Kansas, Mr. Cannon, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Sweeney, Mr. Quinn, 
    Mr. Davis of Tennessee, Mr. Ross, Mrs. Capito, and Mrs. Cubin) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 49, United States Code, to repeal the essential air 
                  service local participation program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Essential Air Service Preservation 
Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EAS LOCAL PARTICIPATION PROGRAM.

    Section 41747 of title 49, United States Code, and the item 
relating to such section in the analysis for subchapter II of chapter 
417 of such title, is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13 - 17 - 00319 - CV IN THE MATTER OF D. M., A CHILD On Appeal from the 449th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. J
- 0153 - 16 - K JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on app eal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant, although he/she is exempt from payment due to his/her inability to pay costs

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. January 18, 2018
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10525]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Committee Management; Notice of Establishment

    The Director of the National Science Foundation has determined that 
the establishment of the Advisory Committee for Environmental Research 
and Education is necessary and in the public interest in connection 
with the performance of duties imposed upon the National Science 
Foundation (NSF), by 42 U.S.C. 1861 et seq. This determination follows 
consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General 
Services Administration.
    Name of Committee: Advisory Committee for Environmental Research 
and Education (5326).
    Purpose: Advise NSF on the impact of its research support and NSF-
wide policies on the scientific community; provide input into 
developing long range plans; and perform oversight of program 
management, overall program balance, and other aspects of program 
performance for the environmental research portfolio with NSF.
    Responsible NSF Official: Marge Cavanaugh, Staff Associate for the 
Environment, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 
1205, Arlington, VA 22230, telephone, (703) 306-1003.

    Dated: April 24, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-10525 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Order entered May 1 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00999
- CR JACKY SCOTT GARRETT, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 36 6th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366
- 81797
- 2012



### O RDER On February 18, 2015, this Court ordered Jan Dugger, official court reporter of the 296th Judicial District Court, to file the complete reporter’s record, including all exhibits, by April 1, 2015. To date, Ms. Dugger has neither filed the reporter’s record nor communicated with the Court regarding the status of the record. Accordingly, w e ORDER Jan Dugger, official court reporter of the 296th Judicial District Court, to file the complete reporter’s record, including all exhibits admitted into evidence, by 4:00 p.m. on MONDAY, MAY 11 , 2015

. If the record, including all exhibits is not filed by the date and time specified, we will order that Jan Dugger not sit as a court reporter until she has filed the record in this appe al.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable John Roach, Jr.,

Presiding Judge, 296th Judicial District Court; the Honorable Ray Wheless, Presiding Judge, 366th Judicial District Court; Jan Dugger, official court reporter, 296th Jud icial District Court, and to counsel for all part i es. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
tt

e

e

n

a

Black Eagle

k

i

h

el

r

e

t

aur

Fran F c

c

8

es rances s

ir

L

e

P

o

l

l

h

d

l

F

Madiso Kimble c

Ki Kim l R

n

r

mble b e in

P

s)

Arden s

e

u

r

e

B

aw

Arden

eo

A

n

 e

o

r

0 (

h

l

c

e

C

r

Frankli 9

Bruce

eh

ll

n

a

o

n g

n C

-

o

I

p

n

i

o

O

n

e

H

M

c

b

t

ia

n

i

u

r

d

r

e

S

n

Vaughn Vaughn T

e

Kr

d

e

atz Kratz

M

y

Lux Lux

r

d

B

n

a

 t

r

R

o

G

e

e

e

t

r

Mitchell y

u

e

B

i

si

ll

w

n

v

l

o

o

ti

e

l

a

w

e

r

o

i

n

A

Hannon

ra

N

T S

M

Morgan v

s

g

M

riangle

F

Ruth

ll

n

iH

Baxter

g

i

i

u

n

a

Ryan

d

n

S

Sim

e

p

n

son

i

o

m

Phillip P

e

t

s

g

hillip d

w

r

n

n

n

a

e

e

Stone n

ih

ll

n

Gray Eagle

N

u

Mu o

h

i

o

rphy s

s

e

hla

p

a

M

Jansma k

g

etS

Jansma c

W

u

a

a

C

J

H

Rivers

te

K

i

i

d

n

e

g

gath

Cambridg u

e

So

Brockton Arling

 ̈¦§ I-90 to

o

Frontage n

not

cri

Ellington

gn

M

ih

on

s

gt

aW

Arlin

drahc

n

s

r

r

O

u

g

b

lli ni

o C

B

Cre BluOld

nando r

illow B

W

i

e

l

F

l

San in

San

wm e o a r ti

n

Ac gs

a

B

g

Sumac o

onellisJ

Bollinger B

n

lue

e e

d

C

oll

ao

r

C

R

e

st

ek

re lcli

n

H

riaMa

r i e B

ol l

C l ue Cre

Turnberry

ek

Troo

Briarwood

restwick n

M

P a

Kincaid

cta

tanr

v

a

i

T

Pe

s

n

h

lle

Downs

c

rchill K

h

Tree

z

Chu

el

e

s

z

o

Robindale ol

J

low

o

H

ene 

D

Sta

H

r 

el

P

36 31 e

a

n

ss

e

South Hills Special

Recreation Management Area

Alternatives C and D

R26E

0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25

Miles

Map 94

Wyoming

T

1

S

Location Map

Montana

Ü

Billings 

Field 

Office

Map scale 1:40,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Billings

90

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Legend

South Hills SRMA

Roads

Streams

Bureau of Land Management

Yellowstone River

Private 

er

e R i v

ston

lwlo

e Y

Public Lands Survey System
Record of Contacts

Docket No. FAA - 2012 - 0938 Directorate Identifier: 2011 - NM - 271 - AD **With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?**  ORGANIZATION PERSON CON TACTED DATE RESPONSE Boeing Grant Rodland 10/20/2011 Concur. ATA Jo e White 11/03/2011 Other. List below .

Other/Additional Information: E - mail sent to ATA describing this AD action.
# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 21-5066 September Term, 2020 1: 20-c v -022 04-UNA Filed O n: July 14, 2 021 Davi d McCon nell,

App ellant
v . Michael Ca rvajal, Directo r, Bure au of Prisons, App ellee ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Pillard, W ilkins, an d Rao , Circuit Jud ges J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P

. 34(a )(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34 (j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s o rders f iled Oct obe r 26, 202 0, a nd Decem ber 2 2, 2 020 , be af f irmed . T he district cou rt prop erly dism issed app ellant ’s pet ition for w rit of m and am us for failure t o sta te a claim on w hich re lief m ay be grant ed. Se e 2 8 U.S .C. § 191 5(e)(2)(B)(ii ); W alpin v . Corp. for Nat’l & Cmty. Servs., 630 F.3d 18 4, 1 86-8 8 (D.C. Cir. 20 11). Moreover, th e d istrict court d id no t ab use its discretion in d enying reconside ration . S ee Fed. R. Civ . P. 59 (e); Fireston e v. Firestone , 76 F.3d 12 05, 12 08 (D.C. Cir. 1996 ) (per curiam ). Sp ecif ically , ap pellan t ha s no t dem onst rated tha t th e d istrict court e rred in co nclud ing thatthe Freed om of Informa tion Act (“FOIA”) provides h im with an alte rnative avenue to obt ain t he informa tion he seeks. Accordin gly , ap pellan t ha s no t sat isf ied h is burd en to d em onst rate tha t “the re is no oth er ad equate rem edy available to [him ].” Po wer v. Barnh art, 2 92 F.3d 78 1, 7 84 (D.C. Cir. 200 2) (citation s an d int erna l quotat ion m arks om itted ). Finally, app ellantha s no t shown tha t th e d istrict court im prop erly dism issed t he case sua spon te withoutproviding leave to am end . S ee Rollins v. W acken hutSe rvs., In c., 7 03 F.3d 12 2, 1 27 (D.C. Cir. 201 2) (district cou rt ma y dism iss a claim w ithou t no tice “w here it is pa ten tly ob v ious t hat the plain tif

f can notpo ssibly

prevail base d o n th e facts a lleged in t he com plaint .”) (citation an d int erna l quotat ion m arks om itted ).

# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 21-5066 September Term, 2020
Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk

Page 2
#### MARY HOUPT *v.*GEORGE HOUPT.

Divorce — depositions without notice — proof of marriage, by reputation and cohabitation— German witness — interpreter.

Depositions taken without notice cannot be read in a divorce case, though the defendant’s is unknown.

Where a witness is called who does not understand English, an interpreter will be sworn to interpret the oath to the witness, and his evidence to the Court.

Proof of reputation and cohabitation is inadmissible as to any collateral marriage in a divorce case.

Divorce. The cause alleged is, that the defendant had a former wife living. The complainant offered depositions taken in Maryland, without notice to the defendant, or his attorney; but he proved that the defendant had gone to parts unknown.

*157By the Court.

These depositions cannot be received. The right to take and read depositions is not a common-law right. It is provided for in this state by. statute, which requires notice to be given to the adverse party or his attorney; and no exception is made in' the law for this class of cases. If the legislature intend to establish a different rule for divorce cases, than obtains in other cases, they must provide the rule.

A German witness was then produced, who did not understand English, and the Court directed an interpreter to be sworn to interpret the oath to him, and his evidence to the Court. The witness proved that the defendant lived in Frederiektown, Maryland, some years ago, with a woman he called his wife. She had a mulatto child, and he left her, came into this country, and married the complainant. No other evidence was offered of the marriage in Maryland.

By the Court. The fourth section of the divorce act, 29 *O. L.*432, authorizes the Court, in applications for divorce, in its discretion, to receive proof of cohabitation and reputation of *the marriage of the parties.*The marriage as to which this kind of evidence may be received, is the one sought to be dissolved, the marriage of the parties to the suit. We do not understand the statute as authorizing the Court to admit reputation and cohabitation as proof of any former or other marriage which comes into question. But, if it were left to our discretion, we think a sound exercise of discretion would reject such evidence, unless under very particular circumstances.

The evidence cannot be received.
#### § 1201.101 Purpose.

It is the purpose of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to carry out aeronautical and space activities of the United States. Such activities shall be the responsibility of, and shall be directed by, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, except that activities peculiar to or primarily associated with the development of weapons systems, military operations, or the defense of the United States shall be the responsibility of, and shall be directed by, the Department of Defense.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3490

To eliminate the requirement that the Public Printer make an additional 

contribution to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund with 

respect to each employee of the Government Printing Office to whom 

a voluntary separation incentive payment has been paid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2003

Mr. NEY (for himself and Mr. LARSON of Connecticut) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To eliminate the requirement that the Public Printer make 

an additional contribution to the Civil Service Retirement 

and Disability Fund with respect to each employee of 

the Government Printing Office to whom a voluntary 

separation incentive payment has been paid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3490 IH 

1 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS 

2 TO RETIREMENT FUND BY PUBLIC PRINTER 

3 FOR EMPLOYEES RECEIVING VOLUNTARY 

4 SEPARATION INCENTIVE PAYMENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 309(c) of the Legislative 

6 Branch Appropriations Act, 1999 (44 U.S.C. 305 note) 

7 is amended by striking paragraph (5). 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to voluntary sepa10 ration incentive payments made on or after April 1, 2003.

Æ
Entered:01/25/22 13:58:33 Desc:

 1
Exhibit H

SUMMARY OF OUTSTANDING PREPA BONDS

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23631-8 Filed:02/27/23 Entered:02/27/23 00:24:23 Desc:

Exhibit H Page 1 of 2
SUMMARY OF OUTSTANDING PREPA BONDS1

Series 

Issue 

Date Amount Issued 

Range of 

Interest Rates for 

Outstanding Bonds 

Final 

Maturity 

Date 

Asserted Principal as of 

Petition Date 

Asserted Principal & 

Interest as of Petition 

Date 

SERIES JJ 1/3/02 720,370,000 5.375% - 5.375% 7/1/18 42,315,000 43,452,216

SERIES LL 7/2/02 499,910,000 5.500% - 5.500% 7/1/19 77,905,000 80,047,388

SERIES MM 10/3/02 105,055,000 5.000% - 5.000% 7/1/23 56,200,000 57,605,000

SERIES NN 8/19/03 517,305,000 4.750% - 5.500% 7/1/33 171,525,000 175,942,925

SERIES PP 8/26/04 224,700,000 3.750% - 5.000% 7/1/25 84,765,000 86,875,446

SERIES QQ 4/4/05 224,700,000 5.500% - 5.500% 7/1/18 35,340,000 36,311,850

SERIES RR 4/4/05 993,450,000 5.000% - 5.000% 7/1/28 236,265,000 242,171,625

SERIES SS 4/4/05 993,450,000 3.875% - 5.000% 7/1/30 332,205,000 340,436,128

SERIES TT 5/3/07 1,943,565,000 4.200% - 5.250% 7/1/37 622,085,000 637,570,581

SERIES UU 5/3/07 1,943,565,000 1.189% - 5.000% 7/1/31 777,280,000 789,310,979

SERIES VV 5/30/07 557,410,000 5.250% - 5.500% 7/1/35 546,645,000 561,018,444

SERIES WW 6/26/08 697,345,000 5.000% - 5.500% 7/1/38 610,140,000 626,460,619

SERIES XX 4/7/10 822,210,000 4.625% - 5.750% 7/1/40 822,210,000 843,980,338

SERIES YY 4/29/10 320,175,000 6.125% - 6.125% 7/1/40 320,175,000 325,077,680

SERIES AAA 5/5/10 363,075,000 5.250% - 5.250% 7/1/31 363,075,000 372,605,719

SERIES ZZ 5/5/10 631,160,000 3.700% - 5.250% 7/1/28 514,900,000 528,076,798

SERIES BBB 5/26/10 76,800,000 5.400% - 5.400% 7/1/28 76,800,000 77,836,800

SERIES CCC 5/26/10 316,920,000 4.250% - 5.250% 7/1/28 316,920,000 325,033,941

SERIES DDD 10/14/10 218,225,000 3.300% - 5.000% 7/1/24 218,225,000 223,144,738

SERIES EEE 12/29/10 355,730,000 5.950% - 6.250% 7/1/40 355,730,000 361,133,935

SERIES 2012A 5/1/12 650,000,000 4.800% - 5.050% 7/1/42 630,110,000 645,848,240

SERIES 2013A 8/21/13 673,145,000 6.750% - 7.250% 7/1/43 673,145,000 696,364,450

Series 2016A 5/19/16 55,639,539 10.000% - 10.000% 7/1/19 55,639,539 58,421,516

Series 2016B 6/22/16 55,210,625 10.000% - 10.000% 7/1/19 55,210,625 57,971,156

Series 2016C 6/30/16 104,600,000 5.400% - 5.400% 7/1/20 104,600,000 110,264,090

Series 2016D 6/30/16 64,375,560 7.500% - 7.500% 7/1/20 64,375,560 69,217,139

Series 2016E 6/30/16 94,828,424 10.000% - 10.000% 7/1/22 94,828,424 104,337,608

Total 14,222,919,148 8,258,614,148 8,476,517,345

 1 The information provided in this document is for summary purposes only. To the extent of any discrepancies between this 

exhibit and the official statements for the respective bonds, the Master Bond Claim (Claim No. [__]), the Disclosure 

Statement or the Plan, those documents shall prevail in all respects. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23631-8 Filed:02/27/23 Entered:02/27/23 00:24:23 Desc:

Exhibit H Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) of 1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Sunshine in the Government Act of 1976 (U.S.C. 552b, as amended) and 41 Code of the Federal Regulations (CFR 102-3. 140 through 160), the Department of the Army announces the following committee meeting:

*Name of Committee:*                         Army Science Board (ASB).                    

*Date(s) of Meeting:*                         Oct 27, 2009—Tuesday.                    

*Time(s) of Meeting:*                         1300- 1400.                    

*Location:*                         Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Purpose:*                         The Army Science Board will receive a report and vote on the findings and recommendations for the LandWarNet study.                    

## Proposed Agenda

*Tuesday:*                         1300-1400—Findings and Recommendations of the LandWarNet III study.                    

The board will conduct internal business before and after the public session.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For information please contact Mr. Justin Bringhurst at                         *justin.bringhurst@us.army.mil*                         or (703) 604-7468 or Carolyn German at                         *carolyn.t.german@us.army.mil*                         or (703) 604-7490.                    

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-24983 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
1 The Hon. Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of

Minnesota, sitting by designation.

2 The Hon. Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 00-2715SD

_____________ United States of America, * * On Appeal from the United Appellee, * States District Court * for the District of v. * South Dakota. * Monica Anne White, * [Not To Be Published] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 15, 2001 Filed: March 1, 2001

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, 1 District Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM. Monica Anne White appeals her mandatory minimum sentence imposed by the District Court 2 pursuant to a conviction for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine in violationof 21 U.S.C. § 846 and possession with the intent to distribute-2-

methamphetaminein violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Ms. White claims the Court erredin imposing sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B) rather than § 841(b)(1)(C). We affirm. Ms. White argues that drug quantities triggering § 841(b)(1)(B) are elements of the statutory offense because this provision imposes a mandatory minimum sentence. Therefore, she says, the indictment must have specified drug quantity and the government

must have proved that quantity to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Since the quantity of methamphetamine involved in the charge here was not alleged in the indictment or proved to the jury, she argues that she should have been sentenced under § 841(b)(1)(C), which has no mandatory minimum. We disagree. We have held that where a defendant is sentenced within the statutory range of the basic crime for which she was convicted, drug quantity does not have to appear in the indictment or be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. See UnitedStates v. Aguayo-Delgado , 220 F.3d 926 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 600 (2000). Here, Ms. White's sentence of 60 months (5 years) imprisonment is within the statutory range of 0 to 20 years provided by § 841(b)(1)(C), which does not reference a specific drug quantity for methamphetamine. Thus, there was no error in Ms. White's sentence. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.