alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
KUPREANOF

DOUGLAS

NAUKATI

HAINES

HOONAH

SITKA

PELICAN

ELFIN COVE

GUSTAVUS

G

U

L

F

O

F

A

LA

S

KA

DIXON ENTRANCE

HOLLIS

HYDABURG

KETCHIKAN

THORNE

BAY

CLARENCE

STRAIT

WRANGELL

PETERSBURG

CRAIG

KLAWOCK

COFFMAN 

COVE

WHALE 

PASS

EDNA

BAY

PT. BAKER 

PORT PROTECTION

SUMNER

STRAIT

PORT

ALEXANDER

KAKE

U

NITE

D

STATE

S

CANADA

FREDERICK

SOUND

TENAKEE 

SPRINGS

CHATHAM

STRAIT

ST

E

P

H

E

N

S

PAS

SAG

E

ANGOON

JUNEAU

LY

N

N

C

A

N

AL

SKAGWAY

UNITED

STATES

CANADA

YAKUTAT

YAKUTAT BAY

Yukon

Bri

Territory

tish Columbia

SAXMAN

MEYERS

CHUCK

METLAKATLA

KASAAN

Tongass National Forest

Land and Resource

Management Plan

Suitable Land

November 2015

A

l a

s

k a

Canada

Tongass

 National

 Forest

Bering Sea

Arctic Ocean

Russia

Alaska

Gulf of

DRAFT EIS

Alternative 4

United States Department of Agriculture

Forest Service

Alaska Region

Tongass National Forest

Ketchikan, Alaska

/

0 5 10 20 30 40

Miles

Document Path: R:\Projects_2014\TNF_FP_Amendment\FPAmendment08\GIS\MapProducts\DEIS\Alt4_SuitableAreas.mxd

Glacier Bay National Park

Suitable Old Growth

Suitable Young Growth

Non-development LUD

Water

Non-Federal Land

BLM-managed Land

Haines State Forest

Klondike Gold Rush National Historic Park

Development LUD
#### C. A. Brown, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Frances Hetherington *et al., Defendants in Error.*

Opinion Filed March 25, 1913.

Where the finding and judgment for the plaintiff in an action of ejectment do not “state the quantity of the estate of the plaintiff” as required by the statute, the judgment will be reversed.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court of Polk County.

Judgment reversed.

*C. C. Whitaker*and *J. E. Glen,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*C. M. Trammell*and *Wm. E. Jackson,*for Defendants in Error.

Whitfield, J.

This statutory action of ejectment was tried before a referee and a writ of error was taken by the defendant. ' The finding of the referee was in favor of the plaintiffs “and against the defendant, C. A. *328Brown, for an undivided two-thirds interest in the lands situated and being in the County of Polk and State of Florida,” the description being given. The judgment is as follows: “It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs do have and recover the possession of the lands situated and being in the County of Polk and State of Florida, and more particularly described as follows: an undivided two-thirds interest in the” described lands.

In the statutory action of ejectment to recover lands from one holding or claiming adversely, the title as well as the right of possession is put in issue. The statutory form of the action does not require the quantity of the estate or right of property to be alleged, and the statutory plea of not guilty admits the possession or adverse claim of the defendants and puts “in issue the title of the lands in controversy.” As the pleadings framed under the statute abstractly put in issue the title to the lands and as the title involved may be a fee simple or a less estate, the statute, in order that the title as between the parties may be adjudicated, expressly requires that the verdict or finding and the judgment for the plaintiff “sháll state the quantity of the estate of the plaintiff,” as well as “give a description of the land recovered.” See Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 South. Rep. 656; Ropes v. Minshew, 51 Fla. 299, 41 South. Rep. 538.

The *finding and*judgment in this case do not “state the quantity of the estate of the plaintiff” in the described lands as provided by the statute.

This requires the judgment to be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. The order overruling the motion for a new trial made before the referee was not excepted to, and the sufficiency of the evidence to *329support the finding has not been considered. See Secs. 1693-4, Gen. Stats, of 1906; Manatee County State Bank v. Wade, 56 Fla. 492, 47 South. Rep. 927.

The judgment is reversed.

Shackleford, C. J., and Taylor, Cockrell and Hooker, J. J., concur.
**Exhibit 32**

# **GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Electric Capital Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), we, Dennis D. Dammerman and James A. Parke, Chairman of the Board and Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            |
| (2)             | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

 

August 1, 2003

 

/s/ Dennis D.Dammerman
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3161

AN ACT

To ratify the authority of the Federal Trade Commission

to establish a do-not-call registry.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3161 EH

1 SECTION 1. NATIONAL DO-NOT-CALL REGISTRY.

2 (a) AUTHORITY.—The Federal Trade Commission is

3 authorized under section 3(a)(3)(A) of the Telemarketing

4 and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act (15

5 U.S.C. 6102(a)(3)(A)) to implement and enforce a na6 tional do-not-call registry.

7 (b) RATIFICATION.—The do-not-call registry provi8 sion of the Telemarketing Sales Rule (16 C.F.R.

9 310.4(b)(1)(iii)), which was promulgated by the Federal

10 Trade Commission, effective March 31, 2003, is ratified.

Passed the House of Representatives September 25,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3161

AN ACT

To ratify the authority of the Federal Trade

Commission to establish a do-not-call registry.
HUALAPAI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES p .0 . BOX 300 e PEACH SPRINGS. ARIZONA 86434 e 520 769-2254 e 520 769·2255 e FAX 520 769·2309 

December 4, 2013 

Mr. Eugene Bromley 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

CWA Standards and Permits Office (WTR-5) 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA. 94105 

Dear Mr. Bromley: 

In response to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) request for certification of Multi-Sector 

General Permit (MSGP) containing a proposed NPDES general permit for storm water discharges from 

industrial facilities in geographic areas where EPA is the permitting authority including four states, Indian 

country lands in various states and the U.S. Pacific Island territories. The Hualapai Tribe reserves all rights and 

obligations stemming from tribal sovereignty and Treatment as a State under the Clean Water Act. The Tribe 

finds the permit to be consistent with the Tribes water quality standards set forth in the Hualapai 

Environmental Review Code, Subtitle I. Water Resources and Wetlands, Part 1. Water Resources Ordinance 

and 401 certification are hereby given. 

In the future the tribe requests all notices of intent for proposed storm water discharges under the MSGP and 

Water 

all pollution prevention plans for storm water discharge on Hualapai Tribal lands shall be submitted to the 

Resource Program through the Tribal Chairwoman for review and approval, P.O. Box 179, Peach 

Springs, AZ 86434. 

If you should have questions or need additional information please contact Alex Cabillo, Water Resources 

Program Manager at (928) 769-2254. 

Sincerely, r ........__ 

Alex Cabillo 

Hualapai Department of Natural Resources
§ 792.50 Program. ( a ) The NCUA's Executive Director is designated as the person responsible for implementation and oversight of NCUA's program for maintaining the security of confidential information regarding national defense and foreign relations. The Executive Director receives questions, suggestions and complaints regarding all elements of this program. The Executive Director is solely responsible for changes to the program and assures that the program is consistent with legal requirements.
( b ) The Executive Director is the Agency's official contact for declassification requests regardless of the point of origin of such requests.
[54 FR 18476, May 1, 1989, as amended at 59 FR 36042, July 15, 1994; 67 FR 30774, May 8, 2002; 73 FR 30478, May 28, 2008; 78 FR 32546, May 31, 2013]
#### Irving *et al. v.*Montgomery.

When the plaintiff takes judgment by default, for want of plea, the record must show there was no plea filed at the time of the rendition of the judgment.

ERROR to the circuit court of Attala county.

Huntington, for plaintiffs in error.

Shackleford, *contra.*

Mr. Justice Trotter

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case is brought before this court by a -writ of error to the circuit court of Attala county. The defendant in error commenced an action of *assumpsit*in the court below, on a promissory note made by the plaintiffs in error, and payable to H. B. Scarborough or order, and endorsed to him by the said Scarborough. The defendants filed the plea of *non assumpsit*and payment, with a bill of particulars, as required by the statute. There was no replication to the plea of payment, nor any notice taken of either plea in the further progress of the cause. The record shows that a judgment by default was taken against the defendants in the court below, for the amount of the note sued on. A motion was made to set aside the judgment which was overruled by the court. It was certainly error to render a judgment by default in the face of these pleas; they are an answer to the plaintiff’s cause of action, and there should have been some disposition made of them. It was insisted by the counsel for the defendant in error, that the pleas were not filed when the judgment was rendered; but there is nothing upon the record to warrant any such conclusion; and if such was the case, it was the duty of the defendant to have placed the fact upon the record.

The judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
# CE2004065EN.01027002.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/270 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/270

---

(2004/C 65 E/284)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3161/03

by Raffaele Costa (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(20 October 2003)

Subject:   Italian proposal for adapting Directive 97/24/EC to technical progress

Subject:

In 2000, the Italian Government proposed that a procedure be launched for adapting Directive 97/24/EC (1) to technical progress with the aim of introducing the separate type-approval of replacement catalysts. This adaptation would enable all manufacturers of replacement catalytic converters to obtain type-approval for their products. Three years have passed since this proposal was presented, and it is still with the relevant departments at the Commission.

1

Could the Commission indicate what stage those departments have reached in their work, whether they have set themselves a deadline for completion of the work and whether on adoption the draft directive will take the form of a technical directive?

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(18 November 2003)

(18 November 2003)

The Commission is presently working on a very large package of amendments with respect to motorcycle emissions through reference to Articles 5-8 of Directive 2002/51/EC (2) (amending Directive 97/24/EC (3)). That package includes replacement catalytic converters and the Commission has worked closely with the Italian authorities, other Member States and stakeholders on this specific issue.

2

3

It was originally foreseen that the Italian proposal on replacement catalysts could be dealt with through the Committee for Adaptation to Technical Progress (CATP). However, the proposal needed more time for consideration by stakeholders and for the preparation of acceptable amendments. It should also be noted that the inclusion of requirements for replacement catalysts in Directive 97/24/EC will extend the scope of that Directive and this should not be addressed through CATP.

Replacement catalytic converters will therefore be dealt with in the overall package of measures to be proposed to the legislators through co-decision. This package of measures is subject to an extended impact assessment that will provide an evaluation of the Commission proposal to be presented to the Parliament and Council during the beginning of 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 226, 18.8.1997, p. 1.

1

(2)  Directive 2002/51/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the reduction of the level of pollutant emissions from two- and three-wheel motor vehicles and amending Directive 97/24/EC, OJ L 252, 20.9.2002.

2

(3)  Directive 97/24/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1997 on certain components and characteristics of two or three-wheel motor vehicles.

3

---
#### § 619.9025 Agricultural land.

Land improved or unimproved which is devoted to or available for the production of crops and other products such as but not limited to fruits and timber or for the raising of livestock.

[37 FR 11446, June 7, 1972. Redesignated at 55 FR 24888, June 19, 1990]
**EXHIBIT      13.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

** PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ENACTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE US SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | a) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                September 17, 2007 |   | /s/                Sylvain Allard                                Sylvain                AllardPresident                & Chief Executive Officer |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: Nancy L Paddock <nancy.paddock@veoliaes.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 9:25 AM
To: Ogulei, David
Cc: Dennis J Warchol Subject: Another round of revisions

Attachments: kBoiler 1rev6.doc; A5 Form PTE Summary(2 of 2)rev6m arked.doc; A5 Form PTE Summary(2 of 2)rev6clean.doc; Emissions Calcs from Applicatio n from Veolia 12-10-13.xlsx



### Let me know if this isn’t everything.

Nancy Paddock Environmental Engineering Specialist Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C.
7 Mobile Avenue Sauget, IL 62201 618.271.2804 (x-115) 618.271.2128 (fax)

Nancy.Paddock@VeoliaES.com
www.VeoliaES.com

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Soluti ons, L.L.C. is for the sole use of the intended rec ipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. A ny unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribu tion is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please communic ate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message and delete it from all computers.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D12-2883 

 ) 

RONALD YORK, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed July 25, 2014. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco 

County; Linda H. Babb, Judge. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant. 

Ronald York, pro se. 

PER CURIAM. 

 This is a companion case to State v. Crumbley, No. 2D12-2882 (Fla. 2d DCA 

July 25, 2014). We reverse and remand for the same reasons expressed in that case. 

ALTENBERND, NORTHCUTT, and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.
Section 1350 Certifications
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: October 15, 2010
    
    /s/ Christopher J. Davino

Christopher J. DavinoPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: October 15, 2010
    
    /s/ John A. Stone

John A. StoneChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
# Official Journal C 274A/18 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 274A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6518 July 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 274A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6518 July 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2022/C 274 A/01 | Recruitment notice PE/276/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for the Presidency – Directorate for Protocol | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2022/C 274 A/01

Recruitment notice PE/276/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for the Presidency – Directorate for Protocol

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 707.9 Enforcement and record retention. ( a ) *Administrative enforcement.* Section 270 of TISA (12 U.S.C. 4309) contains the provisions relating to administrative sanctions for failure to comply with the requirements of TISA and this part.
( b ) *Civil liability.* Section 271 of TISA (12 U.S.C. 4310) contains the provisions relating to civil liability for failure to comply with the requirements of TISA and this part; Section 271 is repealed effective September 30, 2001.
( c ) *Record retention.* A credit union shall retain evidence of compliance with this regulation for a minimum of two years after the date disclosures are required to be made or action is required to be taken.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3133-0134) [58 FR 50445, Sept. 27, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 13436, Mar. 22, 1994; 61 FR 114, Jan. 3, 1996; 63 FR 71575, Dec. 29, 1998]
RICHARD DUANE ERDEN JR.,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4238

Opinion filed October 7, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Richard Duane Erden Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.02    
  


AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE

TO PAWNMART, INC.

2003 STOCK OPTION PLAN  


        This Amendment Number One ("Amendment") to the PawnMart, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan dated January 1, 2003 (the "Plan") is dated as of
February 28, 2003. 


        WHEREAS,
effective February 28, 2003 PawnMart, Inc. changed its name to Xponential, Inc.; 


        All
references in the Plan to "PawnMart, Inc." are hereby deleted and replaced in their entirety with "Xponential, Inc." 









QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.02
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3124 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 

Received 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Geological 

Survey and the United States Bureau of Reclamation 

located at 230 Collins Road, Boise, Idaho, as the ‘‘F.H. 

Newell Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 3124 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Geological Survey 

3 and the United States Bureau of Reclamation located at 

4 230 Collins Road, Boise, Idaho, shall be known and des5 ignated as the ‘‘F.H. Newell Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘F.H. Newell Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
(LOGO)
Farmers State Bank & Trust

Management Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1998, Farmers State Bank and Trust Co.
of Superior  (the Bank) has complied in all material  respects  with the minimum
servicing  standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers  Association of America's
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same
period, the Bank had in effect a fidelity bond in the amount of $2,275,000 and a
mortgagee errors and omissions policy in the amount of $500,000.

Edward J. Meekins
Vice President

Date: March 17, 1999
----

**Exhibit      32**

**Certification      Pursuant to**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                                           |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations                of the                registrant.  |

| October                24, 2005                                                       |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                  |   |
|                                                                                  |   |
| /s/                Jeffrey R. Immelt                                                  |   |
| Jeffrey                R. ImmeltChief                Executive Officer                |   |
|                                                                        |   |
| /s/                James A. Parke                                                     |   |
| James                A. ParkeVice                Chairman and Chief Financial Officer |   |