alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name:*                         Advisory Committee for Small Business Industrial Innovation (61).                    

*Date and Time:*                         May 1-2, 2000, 8:00 am-5:00 pm.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Place:*                         Room 120, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Cheryl Albus, Program Manager, (703) 306-1390, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning research programs pertaining to the small business community.                    

Agenda: May 1, 2000, Room 120

8:00 am-8:30 am: Introductions.

8:30 am-9:00 am: Welcome.

9:00 am-12:00N:  Past Year's Accomplishments; Issues.

12:00N-1:30 pm:  Lunch.

1:30 pm-3:30 pm: Issues (continued).

3:30 pm-3:45 pm: Break.

3:45 pm-4:15 pm: Issues (continued).

4:15 pm-5:30 pm: Discussion.

5:30 pm: Adjourn.

May 2, 2000, Room 120

8:00  am-10:00 am: Preparation of Committee Report.

10:00 am-10:30 am: Break.

10:30 am-12:30 pm: Feedback from the Committee.

12:30 pm——.

Dated: April 19, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-10125 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Innodata  Isogen,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Jack
Abuhoff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                             Jack Abuhoff
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Jack Abuhoff
                                           Chairman of the Board,
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President
                                           March 25, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

 

SECURED INVESTMENT RESOURCES FUND, L.P. II

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Investment Resources Fund, L.P. II (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending march 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Wilkinson, Vice President and Principal Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of March 31, 2007 (the last date of the period covered by the Report).

 

SECURED INVESTMENT RESOURCES FUND, L.P. II

 

By: Millenium Management, LLC

General Partner

 

By: /s/ Peter Wilkinson

Peter Wilkinson

Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

Date: October 26, 2007
§ 107.5 Falsification, reproduction, or alteration. ( a ) No person may make or cause to be made— ( 1 ) Any fraudulent or intentionally false record or report that is required to be made, kept, or used to show compliance with any requirement under this part.
( 2 ) Any reproduction or alteration, for fraudulent purpose, of any certificate, rating, authorization, record or report under this part.
( b ) The commission by any person of an act prohibited under paragraph (a) of this section is a basis for any of the following: ( 1 ) Denial of an application for a remote pilot certificate or a certificate of waiver;
( 2 ) Denial of a declaration of compliance;
( 3 ) Suspension or revocation of any certificate, waiver, or declaration of compliance issued or accepted by the Administrator under this part and held by that person; or
( 4 ) A civil penalty.
[Docket FAA-2015-0150, Amdt. 107-1, 81 FR 42209, June 28, 2016, as amended by Amdt. No. 107-8, 86 FR 4381, Jan. 15, 2021]
#### HAMILTON *v.*PHELPS.

Proof of note — setoff—giving a second note when first outstanding.

The act dispensing with proof on notes declared on without affidavit'annexed to the plea, does not reach a note offered as a setoff — the execution of notes so offered, must be proven. Whether the giving a second note is evidence of the payment of the first, is a question of effect, not of the competency of testimony.

Assumpsit on a note. Plea non assumpsit, without affidavit, and notice of offset of a note given by the plaintiff to the defendant.

The plaintiff read in evidence, under the statute without proof of its execution, the note declared on, dated in 1825, payable on demand, with interest from date, and rested.

The defendant offered to read as an offset, a note given him by the plaintiff, dated July, 1827, fora less sum than the note read by the plaintiff, payable six years after date.

*Matthbws*and *R.*Hitchcock, for the plaintiff,

objected to the admission, because no proof is offered of the execution of the note.

*J. H. Paine*and *P.*Hitchcock, contra,

insisted,

1. The note was admissible as a setoff under the statute dispensing with proof, and

*6902. That it was admissible- under the general issue, to prove payment of the plaintiff’s note, as the giving the second note was not in legal contemplation, payment of the first.

Wood, J.

The statute referred to, exonerates the plaintiff from proving the execution of a paper declared upon, unless the defendant annex to his plea of the general issue an affidavit of its truth: (29 *O. L.*122.) *No provision is*made in the law to dispense with the usual proof in any other case than the one enumerated. It is said, the same reason exists for changing the law of evidence in the case before us, as in that provided for. If it be so, the argument should be addressed to the legislature. Here the inquiry is, what change has been made? not what ought to be made in the law of evidence. The note cannot be read, without its execution is proven.

'The other point made is not *now*properly raised. It looks to the effect, not the competency of the evidence.

, The execution of the note was then proven and read.
§ 708a.306 Membership approval of a proposal to merge. ( a ) A proposal for merger approved by a board of directors also requires approval by a majority of the members who vote on the proposal. At least 20 percent of the members eligible to vote must participate in the vote. The credit union must also have NCUA's written authorization to proceed with the member vote.
( b ) The board of directors must set a voting record date to determine member voting eligibility. The record date must be at least one day before the publication of notice required in § 708a.303.
( c ) A member may vote on a proposal to merge in person at a special meeting held on the date set for the vote or by written ballot delivered by mail or otherwise. The vote on the merger proposal must be by secret ballot and conducted by an independent entity. The independent entity must be a company with experience in conducting corporate elections. No official or senior management official of the credit union or the immediate family members of any official or senior management official may have any ownership interest in or be employed by the independent entity.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3571 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 3571

To modify the boundary of the San Juan Island National Historical Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2003

   Mr. Larsen of Washington introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To modify the boundary of the San Juan Island National Historical Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``San Juan Island National Historical 
Park Boundary Addition Act of 2003.''

SEC. 2. ADDITION TO BOUNDARY OF PEAK.

    The first section of the Act of September 9, 1966 (Public Law 89-
565; 80 Stat 737; 16 U.S.C. 282a) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``That the'' and inserting the following:
    ``Section 1. (a) The''.
            (2) by adding after subsection (a) (as so redesignated by 
        paragraph (1)) the following new subsection:
    ``(b) The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to acquire, by 
donation or exchange only, the property known as the Mitchell Hill, as 
generally depicted on the map entitled `___________________', numbered 
______, and dated ______. The map shall be on file and available for 
inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service.''.
                                 <all>
```
f;^ 

US.DeparTmen( eOO Irdependance Ave , S W 

ofTransponoTion Washington, DC 20S9i 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Mr. Robert Rremnitzer 

Chief, Office of Airworthiness 

Diamond Aircraft Industries, GmbH 

N.A. Otto-Strasse 5 

A-2700 Wiener Neustadt 

Austria 

Dear Mr. Kremnitzer: 

This letter is to inform you that we have received and begun processing your petition for 

exemption. It acknowledges receipt of the petition and describes how we will process it. 

We Have the Petition 

We've received your September 23, 2009, petition on behalf of Diamond Aircraft Industries 

GmbH (Diamond) for an exemption from the stall speed requirements of Title 14 CFR, part 

23, § 23,1419(a), "Ice Protection," to allow certification of the Diamond Model DA 42 NG 

airplane for flight in known icing conditions. This exemption, if granted, would allow the 

Diamond Model DA 42 NG landing conftguration stall speed in icing conditions to exceed 61 

knots. 

We've added your petition to the pubhc docket (No. FAA-2010-0088). Please send us the 

following Austro Control GmbH (ACG) approved documents as soon as possible in order for 

us to process your request: 

7,07,06, Chapter O160/FTR Subpart B, Revision 1 or latest 

7,07,06, Chapter N007/23.1329, latest revision 

Form: IG.OOI DA-42 NG, Chapter 4 (production flight test card), if revised from Revision 1 

you e-mailed to us on January 7, 2010. 

We will contact you if we need additional information. 

How We'll Process the Petition 

A petition for an exemption, according to 14 CFR 11.63(d), must be sent to the FAA at least 

120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. In addition, we publish a 

summary of the petition in the Federal Register for pubhc comment unless, according to 

14 CFR 11.87, we determine that good cause exists for not publishing it. 
Because granting your petition wouldn't set a precedent, we've determined that we shouldn't 

delay action on it by publishing it for public comment. Therefore, we've waived the 

requirement for Federal Register publication. Even though we have waived this requirement, 

you shouldn't construe this action to be approval of your request. We will consider fully the 

facts and circumstances contained in your petition and will process it accordingly. 

We will advise you of the agency's final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions in the meantime, you may contact Paul Pellicano at (404) 474-5558. 

Sincerely, 

Kim Smith, Manager 

Small Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service
#### RICHARDSON v. HUGHES.

Trespass — declaration of co-heirs — evidence to prove issue.

It is not competent to prove the declarations as to title of one in the same relation, as the plaintiff’s grantor.

If land be held by a trustee under a will, his deed may be read before or after the will — evidence is admissible which tends to prove the issue, though of itself insufficient.

Trespass, quare clausum fregit. Plea not guilty. Both parties claim title from Willets, one of several heirs.

The plaintiff called a witness to prove a declaration of one of the co-heirs of Willets.

Mason, objected.

Bell, for the plaintiff,

objected, that before Taylor could convey, he must produce the will under which he acted as trustee.

Wood, J.

The witness is called to prove the declarations of one competent as a witness and inadmissible.

The defendant then offered a patent from the United States to Taylor and other executors, as trustees, and a deed from Taylor.

Wood, J.

Upon the assumption of the objection, the deed is a link in the chain of evidence, and it is of no account whether it is *649exhibited before or after the will. Though the deed may not by itself make out the defendant’s right, if it tend to prove it, as we think it does, it is admissible.
Exhibit 32(a)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of RMS TITANIC, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on October 13, 2004, (the "Report"), I, Arnie Geller, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Arnie Geller
-------------------------
Arnie Geller
Chief Executive Officer
October 13, 2004
#### § 120.5 Procedures.

Each employer having a drug and alcohol testing program under this part must ensure that all drug and alcohol testing conducted pursuant to this part complies with the procedures set forth in 49 CFR part 40.
§ 715.3 General responsibilities of the Supervisory Committee. ( a ) *Basic.* The supervisory committee is responsible for ensuring that the board of directors and management of the credit union— ( 1 ) Meet required financial reporting objectives and
( 2 ) Establish practices and procedures sufficient to safeguard members' assets.
( b ) *Specific.* To carry out the responsibilities set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, the supervisory committee must determine whether: ( 1 ) Internal controls are established and effectively maintained to achieve the credit union's financial reporting objectives which must be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the supervisory committee audit, verification of members' accounts and its additional responsibilities;
( 2 ) The credit union's accounting records and financial reports are promptly prepared and accurately reflect operations and results;
( 3 ) The relevant plans, policies, and control procedures established by the board of directors are properly administered; and
( 4 ) Policies and control procedures are sufficient to safeguard against error, conflict of interest, self-dealing and fraud.
( c ) *Mandates.* In carrying out the responsibilities set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the Supervisory Committee must: ( 1 ) Ensure that the credit union adheres to the measurement and filing requirements for reports filed with the NCUA Board under § 741.6 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Perform or obtain a supervisory committee audit, as prescribed in § 715.4 of this part;
( 3 ) Verify or cause the verification of members' passbooks and accounts against the records of the credit union, as prescribed in § 715.8 of this part;
( 4 ) Act to avoid imposition of sanctions for failure to comply with the requirements of this part, as prescribed in §§ 715.11 and 715.12 of this part.
[64 FR 41035, July 29, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 27828, May 17, 2004]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED  FROM
EPOLIN, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                             598,341
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      266,594
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        301,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   1,289,945
<PP&E>                             646,116
<DEPRECIATION>                     540,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     1,726,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              54,737
<BONDS>                            0
<COMMON>                           2,206,984
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       1,726,642
<SALES>                            1,233,301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   1,233,301
<CGS>                              378,530
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      378,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   575,941
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    288,509
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                288,509
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       288,509
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .02

</TABLE>
§ 43.8 Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ABS. ( a ) *In general.* A sponsor satisfies its risk retention requirement under this part if the sponsor fully guarantees the timely payment of principal and interest on all ABS interests issued by the issuing entity in the securitization transaction and is: ( 1 ) The Federal National Mortgage Association or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation operating under the conservatorship or receivership of the Federal Housing Finance Agency pursuant to section 1367 of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4617) with capital support from the United States; or
( 2 ) Any limited-life regulated entity succeeding to the charter of either the Federal National Mortgage Association or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation pursuant to section 1367(i) of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4617(i)), provided that the entity is operating with capital support from the United States.
( b ) *Certain provisions not applicable.* The provisions of § 43.12(b), (c), and (d) shall not apply to a sponsor described in paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section, its affiliates, or the issuing entity with respect to a securitization transaction for which the sponsor has retained credit risk in accordance with the requirements of this section.
( c ) *Disclosure.* A sponsor relying on this section shall provide to investors, in written form under the caption “Credit Risk Retention” and, upon request, to the Federal Housing Finance Agency and the Commission, a description of the manner in which it has met the credit risk retention requirements of this part.
§ 390.294 Land loan. The term *land loan* means a loan: ( a ) Secured by real estate upon which all facilities and improvements have been completely installed, as required by local regulations and practices, so that it is entirely prepared for the erection of structures;
( b ) To finance the purchase of land and the accomplishment of all improvements required to convert it to developed building lots; or
( c ) Secured by land upon which there is no structure.