alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 702
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 702 appear at 84 FR 1606, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 702.303 Capital policy. ( a ) *General requirements.* The extent and sophistication of a covered credit union's governance over its capital planning and analysis process must align with the extent and sophistication of that process. The process must be consistent with the financial condition, size, complexity, risk profile, scope of operations, and level of capital of the covered credit union. The ultimate responsibility for governance over a covered credit union's capital planning and analysis process rests with the credit union's board of directors. Senior management must establish a comprehensive, integrated, and effective process that fits into the broader risk management of the credit union. Senior management responsible for capital planning and analysis must provide regular reports on capital planning and analysis to the credit union's board of directors (or a designated committee of the board).
( b ) *Mandatory elements.* A covered credit union's board of directors (or a designated committee of the board) must review and approve a capital policy, along with procedures to implement it. The capital policy must: ( 1 ) State goals and limits for capital levels and risk exposure.
( 2 ) Establish requirements for reviewing and reporting capital levels and breaches of capital limits, with contingency plans for remedying any breaches.
( 3 ) State the governance over the capital analysis process, including all the activities that contribute to the analysis;
( 4 ) Specify capital analysis roles and responsibilities, including controls over external resources used for any part of capital analysis (such as vendors and data providers);
( 5 ) Specify the internal controls that govern capital planning, including review by internal audit, control of changes in capital planning procedures, and required documentation;
( 6 ) Describe the frequency with which capital analyses will be conducted;
( 7 ) State how capital analysis results are used and by whom; and
( 8 ) Be reviewed at least annually and updated as necessary to ensure that it remains current with changes in market conditions, credit union products and strategies, credit union risk exposures and activities, the credit union's established risk appetite, and industry practices.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3389 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3389

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
   To amend the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 to 
permit Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Awards to be made to nonprofit 
                             organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    Section 17(c)(1) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act 
of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3711a(c)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
        ``(F) Nonprofit organizations.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# C_2014088EN.01001001.xml

| 27.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/10

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 15 November 2013

in Case E-10/13

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by an EEA/EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle for equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation)

2014/C 88/07

In Case E-10/13, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland — APPLICATION for a declaration that by failing, within the time prescribed, to adopt measures necessary to correctly implement into its national legislation the provisions of Article 2(1)(a)-(d) and Article 2(2)(a)-(b) of the Act referred to at point 21b of Annex XVIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle for equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 15 November 2013, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | declares that, by failing within the time limit prescribed to adopt the measures necessary to correctly implement into its national legislation Article 2(1)(a)-(d) and Article 2(2)(a)-(b) of the Act referred to at point 21b of Annex XVIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle for equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declares that, by failing within the time limit prescribed to adopt the measures necessary to correctly implement into its national legislation Article 2(1)(a)-(d) and Article 2(2)(a)-(b) of the Act referred to at point 21b of Annex XVIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle for equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act;

| 2. | orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR

PUERTO RICO, as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF

PUERTO RICO, et al.

Debtors,

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17-BK-3283 (LTS)

(Jointly Administered)

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR

PUERTO RICO, as a representative of

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER

AUTHORITY,

Debtor.

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17-BK-4780 (LTS)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 83D(a) of the Local Civil Rules of the

United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, Rules 2002, 9007, and 9010(b) of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, made applicable to these proceedings by Section 310 of 

the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”), 48 U.S.C. 

§ 2170 et seq., and sections 102(1) and 1109(b) of title 11 of the United States Code (the 

“Bankruptcy Code”), made applicable to these proceedings by Section 301 of PROMESA, Elaine 

M. Maldonado Matías hereby enters its appearance in the above-captioned Title III case of the 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23577 Filed:02/21/23 Entered:02/21/23 10:59:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
-2-

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority as co-counsel to creditor and party-in-interest Ahimsa 

Foundation and hereby requests that all motions, pleadings, notices, papers and orders be served 

upon the undersigned counsel.

WE HEREBY CERTIFY that this document was electronically filed with the Clerk of 

the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will notify case participants.

Dated: February 21, 2023

Respectfully submitted,

SEPULVADO, MALDONADO & COURET

304 Ponce de León

Suite 990

San Juan, PR 00918

By: /s/ Elaine M. Maldonado-Matías

Elaine M. Maldonado-Matías

USDC-PR No. 217309

Telephone: (787) 765-5656

Email: emaldonado@smclawpr.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23577 Filed:02/21/23 Entered:02/21/23 10:59:57 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 51848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24253]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM06-16-000]


Mandatory Reliability Standards for the Bulk Power System; Notice 
of Extension of Time

October 1, 2009.
    On September 30, 2009, the North American Electric Reliability 
Corporation (NERC) filed a request for an extension of time to file 
comments in response to the Commission's September 10, 2009 notice \1\ 
requesting comments on the Topological and Impedance Element Ranking 
(TIER) Report in the above-docketed proceeding. In its motion, NERC 
states that it requires additional time to address questions that were 
raised at a public presentation for the TIER report and to submit 
responsive comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Mandatory Reliability Standards for the Bulk Power System, 
RM06-16-000 (Notice of Public Meeting) (September 10, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that an extension of 
time for filing comments on the TIER report is granted to and including 
October 28, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-24253 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-24-2000
<CASH>                                             268
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,245
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        833
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,583
<PP&E>                                          38,636
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,938
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,576
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,962
<SALES>                                         74,228
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,974
<CGS>                                           20,283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,654
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (170)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (65)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (105)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (105)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
```

[110th Congress Public Law 64]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ064.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 567]]

Public Law 110-64
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
601 Banyan Trail in Boca Raton, Florida, as the ``Leonard W. Herman Post 
            Office''. <<NOTE: Aug. 9, 2007 -  [H.R. 1722]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LEONARD W. HERMAN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 601 Banyan Trail in Boca Raton, Florida, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Leonard W. Herman Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Leonard W. 
Herman Post Office''.

    Approved August 9, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1722:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            May 21, 22, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
**Exhibit      32.2**

|   | 1. | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|    /s/                Steven L. Ford       |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|    Steven                L. Ford           |
|    Executive                Vice President |
|    Chief                Financial Officer  |
|                                                      |
|    March                13, 2008           |

----
DESCHUTES

RIVER 

CROOKED

 RIVER 

Little

Deschutes River 

Ochoco
 

Reservoir
 

Prineville
 

Reservoir
 

East Paulina Lake Lake 

Wickiup

Reservoir
EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

                             The Board of Directors

                          Turbosonic Technologies Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference to the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-57230) and related prospectus of Turbosonic Technologies, Inc.
for the registration of 900,000 shares of its common stock and the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-57248) pertaining to the Turbosonic Technologies,
Inc. 2000 Stock Plan of our report dated September 12, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Turbosonic Technologies, Inc. for the year
ended June 30, 2002 included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB).


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
September 25, 2002
Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
<PAGE>
 
                                Exhibit No. 21

                          Subsidiaries of Registrant


People's Choice TV of Tucson, Inc.

People's Choice TV of Houston, Inc.

People's Choice TV of St. Louis, Inc.

SpeedChoice of Phoenix, Inc.

Wireless Cable of Indianapolis, Inc.

SpeedChoice of Detroit, Inc.

People's Choice TV of Salt Lake City, Inc.

PCTV Gold, Inc.

Preferred Entertainment, Inc.

Broadcast Cable, Inc.

People's Choice TV of Albuquerque, Inc.

Sat-Tel Services, Inc.

People's Choice TV of Milwaukee, Inc.

SpeedChoice Equipment, Inc.

Waverunner, Inc.

PCTV Development Co.
§ 612.2300 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part applies to all institutions of the Farm Credit System as defined in section 1.2(a) of the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended, (Act) (12 U.S.C. 2002(a)) including, but not limited to, associations, banks, service corporations chartered under section 4.25 of the Act, the Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation, the Farm Credit Leasing Services Corporation, and the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (hereinafter, institutions). The purposes of this part are to ensure public confidence in the Farm Credit System, to ensure the reporting of known or suspected criminal activity, to reduce potential losses to institutions, and to ensure the safety and soundness of institutions. This part requires that institutions use the Farm Credit Administration Criminal Referral Form (hereinafter FCA Referral Form) to notify the appropriate Federal authorities when any known or suspected Federal criminal violations of the type described in § 612.2301 are discovered by institutions.
( b ) The specific referral requirements of this part apply to known or suspected criminal violations of the United States Code involving the assets, operations, or affairs of an institution. This part prescribes procedures for referring those violations to the proper Federal authorities and the Farm Credit Administration. No specific procedural requirements apply to the referral of violations of State or local laws.
( c ) Nothing in this part should be construed as reducing in any way an institution's ability to report known or suspected criminal activities to the appropriate investigatory or prosecuting authorities, whether Federal, State, or local, even when the circumstances in which a report is required under § 612.2301 are not present.
( d ) It shall be the responsibility of each System institution to determine whether there appears to be a reasonable basis to conclude that a criminal violation has been committed and, if so, to report the matter to the proper law enforcement authorities for consideration of prosecution.
( e ) Each referral required by § 612.2301(a) shall be made on the FCA Referral Form in accordance with the FCA Referral Form instructions relating to its filing and distribution.
[62 FR 24566, May 6, 1997. Redesignated and amended at 69 FR 10907, Mar. 9, 2004; 75 FR 35968, June 24, 2010.]
TIEXEA~TORNEY GxNE!RAL 

OF TEXAS 

Aua-. T- rsrll 

.FOEN L EXCL 

*-- #3mzxSXaApril 7, 1975 

The Honorable Clayton T. Garrison 

Executive Director 

Opinion,No. H- 575 

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 

John H. Reagan Building 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Dear Mr. Garrison: 

Re: Whether the Texas Parks 

Fund may be used for operational expenses of state parks. 

You have requested our opinion concerning the propriety of an 

expenditure by the Parks and Wildlife Department from Texas Parks Fund 31 

for operational expenses of the state parks. The current appropriations act 

contained a general appropriation from Parks Fund 31 for use by the Department. 

Texas Parks Fund 31 is established by article 7.06(3), TaxationGeneral, V. T. C. S. , which provides in part: 

Fifty cents of the tax levied under this Article 

on each 1.000 cigarettes shall be credited to a 

new special fund known as the Texas ,Parks Fund 

which may be used by the Parks and Wildlife 

Department for the acquisition, planning, and 

development of state parks and historic sites. 

This article limits the use of Texas Parks Fund 31 to the “acquisition, planning, and development of state parks and historic sites. ‘I This 

limitation was apparently assumed in Attorney General Opinions M-1164~. 

(1972) and M-1061 (1972). and similar language in other statutes has been held 

to establish such a limitation. See Johnson v. Ferguson, 55 S. W. 2d 153 (Tex. 

Civ. App. -- Austin 1932, writzm’d. ) 

The use of Parks Fund 31 for the construction of a state office 

building to be used for “wildlife scientific research and comprehensive park 

and statewide outdoor recreational planning ‘I has .been held to be within the 

meaning of the limitation. Attorney General Opinion M-952, (1971): Other 

authorized uses indude planning for the statewide development of all park 

lands within the state, M-1164 (1972); and providing relocation assistance costs 

p. 2569 
The Honorable Clayton T. Garrison - Page 2 (H-575) 

involved in the acquisition of land for planning and development of state parks 

and historic sites. M-1061 (1972). These uses were considered to be within 

the limitation of article 7.06( 3) since they pertained to the acquisition, planning, 

and development of state parks and historic sites. 

In our opinion, operational expenses may likewise be pertinent to 

these activities. Accordingly, to the extent that the operational expenses of 

the Department are referable and allocable to the acquisition, planning, or 

development of state parks and historic sites, they may be financed from Texas 

Parks Fund 31. 

SUM-MARY 

To the extent that operational expenses of the Parks 

and UFildlife Department pertain to the acquisition, 

planning, or development of state parks and .historic 

sites they may.be financed from Texas Parks Fund .31. 

Very ~truly yours, 

Attorney General of Texas 

APROVED: 

DAVIDM . KE NDALL, First Assistant 

Opinion Committee 

jwb 

p., 2570
Editorial Note on Part 708b
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 708b appear at 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019, and at 85 FR 62213, Oct. 2, 2020.

§ 708b.202 Notice to members of proposal to terminate insurance. ( a ) When the board of directors of a federally insured credit union adopts a resolution proposing to terminate federal insurance, including termination due to a merger or conversion of charter, it must provide its members with written notice of the proposal to terminate and of the date set for the membership vote. The first written communication following the resolution that is made by or on behalf of the credit union and that informs the members that the credit union will seek termination is the notice of the proposal to terminate. This notice must: ( 1 ) Inform the members of the requirement for a membership vote and the date for the vote;
( 2 ) Explain that the insurance provided by the NCUA is federal insurance and is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government; and
( 3 ) Include a conspicuous statement that if the termination or merger is approved, and the credit union, or the continuing credit union in the case of a merger, subsequently fails, the federal government does not guarantee the member will get his or her money back.
( b ) The credit union must deliver the notice in person to each member, or mail it to each member at the address for the member as it appears on the records of the credit union, not more than 30 nor less than 7 days before the date of the vote. The membership must be given the opportunity to vote by mail ballot. The credit union may provide the notice of the proposal and the ballot to members at the same time.
( c ) If the membership and the NCUA approve the proposition for termination of insurance, the credit union must give the members prompt and reasonable notice of termination.