alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 121.395 Aircraft dispatcher: Domestic and flag operations.

Each certificate holder conducting domestic or flag operations shall provide enough qualified aircraft dispatchers at each dispatch center to ensure proper operational control of each flight.

[Doc. No. 28154, 61 FR 2611, Jan. 26, 1996]
Exhibit 99.17





CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON








Golden Star Resources Ltd.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Golden Star Resources Ltd.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





I hereby consent to (i) being named and identified as a "qualified person" and the use of my name in connection with the following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Form 40-F”) of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) to which this consent relates: (A) the technical report entitled “43-101 Technical Report on Resources and Reserves Golden Star Resources Ltd., Bogoso Prestea Gold Mine, Ghana" effective date December 31, 2013 and filed on March 14, 2014, (B) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2014 and (C) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2014, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from such documents in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-175542, 333-169047, 333-118958, 333-105821 and 333-105820), as amended, and Registration Statement No. 333-196906 on Form F-10, as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.








/s/ John Arthur_________________________


Dr. John Arthur





March 31, 2015
1

EXHIBIT F

LIST OF PROFESSIONALS BY MATTER

Matter 

Number Matter Name Timekeeper Name Initials Position

396-00002 General

Juan J. Casillas JJC Partner

Luis Llach LLL Partner

Edna Tejeda ET Counsel

Cristina Fernandez CF Junior Partner

Paralegal Services PLS Paralegal

396-00006 PREPA

Juan J. Casillas JJC Partner

Luis Llach LLL Partner

Edna Tejeda ET Counsel

Cristina Fernandez CF Junior Partner

Juan Nieves JN Junior Partner

Paralegal Services PLS Paralegal

396-00007 HTA

Juan J. Casillas JJC Partner

Cristina Fernandez CF Junior Partner

Juan Nieves JN Junior Partner

Paralegal Services PLS Paralegal

396-0008 ERS Juan J. Casillas JJC Partner

396-00015 Fee Application

Juan J. Casillas JJC Partner

Luis Llach LLL Partner

Paralegal Services PLS Paralegal

396-00017 Claims Review

Juan J. Casillas JJC Partner

Luis Llach LLL Partner

Luis Ramos LRC Member

Edna Tejeda ET Counsel

Cristina Fernandez CF Junior Partner

Juan Nieves JN Junior Partner

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22873-8 Filed:11/15/22 Entered:11/15/22 18:14:56 Desc:

Exhibit F Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 747

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 747.802 Non-public formal investigative proceedings.

Unless otherwise ordered by the NCUA Board, all formal investigative proceedings shall be non-public.
§ 1206.700 How to submit an appeal. ( a ) A member of the public who has requested an Agency record in accordance with subpart C of this part, and who has received an initial determination which does not comply fully with the request, may appeal such an adverse initial determination to the Administrator, or, for records as specified in § 1206.805, to the Inspector General within 90 days from the date of the initial determination letter.
( b ) The appeal must: ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Be addressed to the Administrator, NASA Headquarters, Executive Secretariat, Washington, DC 20546, or, for records as specified in § 1206.805, to the Inspector General, NASA Headquarters, Room 8U71, 300 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20546;
( 3 ) Be identified clearly on the envelope and in the letter as an “Appeal under the Freedom of Information Act;”
( 4 ) Include a copy of the initial request for the Agency record and a copy of the adverse initial determination along with any other correspondence with the FOIA office;
( 5 ) To the extent possible, state the reasons the adverse initial determination should be reversed; and
( 6 ) Be sent to the Administrator or the Inspector General, as appropriate, within 90 days of the date of the initial determination.
( c ) An official authorized to make a final determination may waive any of the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, in which case the time limit for the final determination (see § 1206.701(a)) shall run from the date of such waiver.
[79 FR 46678, Aug. 11, 2014, as amended at NASA-2019-0005, 84 FR 54778, Oct. 11, 2019]
(LOGO)



Attention: Master Servicing
Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044

RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1998 fiscal year:

A. I have reviewed the  activities and  performance  of the Servicer  during the
preceding  fiscal  year  under  the  terms of  the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer Guide and to
the best of these  Officers  knowledge,  the Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its
duties,  responsibilities  or obligations under these Agreement  throughout such
year, or if there has been a  default or failure of the  servicer to perform any
of such duties, responsibilities or obligation, a description of each default or
failure  and the nature and status  thereof has been  reported  to Norwest  Bank
Minnesota, N.A.;

B. I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is  currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
servicer in good standing;

C. I have confirmed  that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions  Insurance
Policy and any other  bonds required under the terms of the Servicing Agreement,
Trust Agreement,  Polling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicers Guide
are in full force and effect;

D. All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance  Policy (if
applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable),  with respect
to each Mortgaged  Property, have been paid and that all such insurance policies
are in full force and effect;

E. All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any  other  expenses
accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance  on any
Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid, or in any such costs or expenses have not
been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property,  the reason for the nonpayment
has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N. A.;

F. All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

G. All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of  Mortgage  Property
required  per section  6050H,   6050J and 6050P of the  Internal  Revenue  Code,
respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:

Edward J. Meekins
Vice President

March 30,1999

Mortgage Loan Department

P.O.  Box 268  Superior,  Nebraska  68978-0268  * Fax  432-879-4895  * Phone 402
877-4450
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         428,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,317,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,590,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,372,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,253,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,372,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               903,700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  397,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               208,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             141,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                183,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   183,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.93
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM ZEON CORPORATION'S FIANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         616,721
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  864,430
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (8,181
<INVENTORY>                                    793,015
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,334,592
<PP&E>                                         164,502
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (43,840)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,542,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,512,097
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,454
<OTHER-SE>                                     925,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,542,934
<SALES>                                      2,524,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,524,238
<CGS>                                        1,847,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  640,124
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,660
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             41,660
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,660
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12



</TABLE>
Exhibit O

ESTIMATION OF GENERAL UNSECURED CLAIMS POOL

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23631-15 Filed:02/27/23 Entered:02/27/23 00:24:23 Desc:

Exhibit O Page 1 of 2
Estimated Value

(Low)

Adjusted

Estimated Value

Estimated Value

(High)

# Category Asserted Amount Claim Amount Claim Amount Claim Amount

General Unsecured Claims

1 PPOA 2,779,645,677                    65,613,535         462,289,328        858,965,120

2 Master Claim ‐ UTIER Damages 1,205,492,250          ‐                          ‐                          ‐                        

3 Master Claim ‐ UTIER Grievances 1,124,524,226                  193,879,148         229,129,148        264,379,148

4 Litigation (w/o Vitol) 543,590,333                          8,575,646           27,244,485          45,913,324

5 UITICE Litigation 224,900,000              ‐                                    11,245,000        224,900,000

6 Employee 14,834,448                            2,595,909             8,715,179          14,834,448

7 Contract 12,074,869                          12,074,869           12,074,869          12,074,869

8 Judgment/Settlement 6,850,955                              6,850,955             6,850,955            6,850,955

9 UITICE Arbitration Awards 5,673,022                              5,673,022             5,673,022            5,673,022

10 Trade 5,538,878                              5,538,878             5,538,878            5,538,878

11 Master Claim ‐ UEPI 3,711,794                              3,711,794             3,711,794            3,711,794

12 Lease 530,128                                     530,128                 530,128               530,128

Total General Unsecured Claims 5,927,366,580                  305,043,885         773,002,786    1,443,371,686

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23631-15 Filed:02/27/23 Entered:02/27/23 00:24:23 Desc:

Exhibit O Page 2 of 2
INNODATA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>

<CAPTION>



<S>                                               <C>

PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE            1995

Reconciliation of net income per statement
     of income to amount used
     in earnings per share computation:
          Net income, as reported                 $1,511,388
          Add-Interest on investment, net
               of tax effect, on application of
               assumed proceeds from exercise of
               options and warrants in
               excess of 20% limitation              249,974
                                                  ----------

          Net income, as adjusted                 $1,761,362
                                                  ==========

Reconciliation of weighted average number
     of shares outstanding to amount
     used in earnings per share computation:
          Weighted average number of
               shares outstanding                  4,448,473
                                                  ----------
          Add-Shares issuable from assumed
               exercise of options and warrants
               in excess of 20% limitation         1,007,793

          Weighted average number of shares
                outstanding, as adjusted           5,456,266
                                                  ==========

Primary and fully diluted earnings per share      $      .32
                                                  ==========

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3505

To amend the Bend Pine Nursery Land Conveyance Act to specify the 

recipients and consideration for conveyance of the Bend Pine Nursery, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2003

Mr. WALDEN of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To amend the Bend Pine Nursery Land Conveyance Act 

to specify the recipients and consideration for conveyance 

of the Bend Pine Nursery, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF BEND PINE NURSERY LAND 

4 CONVEYANCE. 

5 Section 3 of the Bend Pine Nursery Land Convey6 ance Act (Public Law 106–526; 114 Stat. 2512) is amend7 ed—

8 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘210 

9 acres’’ and inserting ‘‘185 acres’’; 
2

•HR 3505 IH 

1 (2) in subsection (e), by striking paragraph (3); 

2 and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub4 section: 

5 ‘‘(g) SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR BEND PINE

6 NURSERY CONVEYANCE.—

7 ‘‘(1) CONVEYANCE TO PARK AND RECREATION

8 DISTRICT.—The Secretary shall offer to sell to the 

9 Bend Metro Park and Recreation District in 

10 Deschutes County, Oregon, for consideration in the 

11 amount of $3,505,676, all right, title, and interest 

12 of the United States in and to approximately 170 

13 acres of the parcel of land identified as Tract A in 

14 subsection (a)(1). The land conveyed to the Bend 

15 Metro Park and Recreation District shall be used 

16 only for recreation purposes and may be developed 

17 for those purposes. 

18 ‘‘(2) CONVEYANCE TO SCHOOLDISTRICT.—In 

19 accordance with section 202 of the Education Land 

20 Grant Act (16 U.S.C. 479a), the Secretary shall 

21 convey to the Administrative School District No. 1, 

22 Deschutes County, Oregon, without consideration, 

23 all right, title, and interest of the United States in 

24 and to approximately 15 acres of land in the north25 west corner of the parcel of land identified as Tract 
3

•HR 3505 IH 

1 A in subsection (a)(1). The land conveyed to the 

2 School District shall be used only for educational 

3 purposes.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<CIK>  0000903651
<NAME>  INNODATA  CORPORATION


       

<CAPTION>



<S>
                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,097,193
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,718,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,165,986
<PP&E>                                       3,617,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,416,296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,391,865
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,652
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,416,296
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,536,448
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,495,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (959,498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (357,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (602,498)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        





</TABLE>
The Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the 1 Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-1384

___________ Bruce Bell, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the Unite d States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District o f Arkansas. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * (UNPUBLISHED) * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 3, 1997

Filed: October 14 , 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Bruce Bell, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 1 granting summary judgment affirming the Commissioner’ s deci sion to deny Bell disability insurance benefits an d supplemental security income. After reviewin g the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude th e-2-

Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantia l evidence on the-3-

record as a whole. See Piepgras v. Chater , 76 F.3d 233, 236 ( 8th Cir. 1996) (standard of review). We furthe r conclude t he district court did not abuse its discretion in deny ing Bell’s motion to supplement the record an d remand. See Geigle v. Sullivan , 961 F.2d 139 5, 1397 (8th Cir. 1992) (standard of review); Woolf v. Sha lala , 3 F.3d 1210 , 1215 (8th Cir. 1993) (circumstances permitting 4 2 U.S.C. § 405(g) remand). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the distric t court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Malone *v.*The State.

*Violating Prohibition Law.*

(Decided February 3, 1914.

64 South. 632.)

*Criminal Lata; Continuance; Absent Witness.*— Where defendant did not indicate to the court in any way that he expected to elicit any material testimony from either of his absent witnesses, it was not error for the court to deny his motion for a continuance or a postponement of the trial until he could have such witnesses brought in by attachment.

Appeal from Dale Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. M. Sollie.

Will Malone was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

J. E. Z. Riley, for appellant.

Defendant was entitled'to have his absent witnesses, and the court erred in putting him to trial without them, over his seasonable objection. — Sec. 6, Constitution 1901.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

No indication was given the court that any material testimony would be elicited from the absent witnesses, and the court will not be put in error for overruling a motion for a *continuance.*— Palmer *v.*State, 165 Ala. 129.

WALKER, P. J.

In reference to a motion of a defendant in a criminal case for the continuance or postponement of his trial in order that some of his wit*179nesses might be brought into court by attachment, it was said, in the opinion rendered in the case of *Palmer v. State,*165 Ala. 129, 51 South. 358: “To fasten error upon the trial court, it must be made to appear that the application was seasonably made, and accompanied by a showing as to what the absent witness is expected to swear, in order that the court may judge of its materiality.”

Waiving the inquiry as to the defendant’s having-exercised due diligence to secure the attendance of the witnesses, it is enough to say, in justification of the court’s action on his application, that he did not in any way indicate to the court that he expected to elicit any material testimony from either of the witnesses. It is not made to appear that error was committed by the court in refusing to delay the trial until compulsory process could be served on two witnesses, the nature of whose expected testimony was not disclosed, and for neither of whom was a subpoena requested until the afternoon of the day which intervened between that for which the case had been set for trial on the docket and that on which the tidal 'was entered upon.

Affirmed.