alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Brian R. Leahy

Director 

# Department of Pesticide Regulation

Edmund G. Brown Jr.
Governor

1001 I Street • P.O. Box 4015 • Sacramento, California 95812

- 4015 • www.cdpr.ca.gov

A Department of the California Environmental Protection Agency

Printed on recycled paper, 100% post

- consumer

-- processed chlorine

- free. March 29, 2012

TO: Interested Parties

SUBJECT : ANNUAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIO NS INVENTORY

REPORT: EMISSIONS FO R 1990-2010

As required under Title 3, California Code of Regulations (3 CCR), section 6452.4, the Department of Pesticide Regulation has completed the annual volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions inventory report that includes the following information:

• total a gricultural and structural pesticide VOC emissions for the previous years

• evaluation of compliance with benchmarks specified in 3 CCR section 6452.2

• fumigant emission limits for the upcoming year if necessary, according to 3 CCR section 6452.2

• an emission rating (or application method adjustment factor, the percentage of fumigant applied emitted to air) for each fumigation method

This report contains information based on 1990–2010 pesticide use data for five ozone nonattainment areas (NAAs) in California. The pesticide VOC emissions are compared to the goals described in the ozone state implementation plan (SIP). These “SIP goals” are a 20 percent reduction from 1990 for the Sacramento Metro, Southeast Desert, and South Coast NAAs; a 12 percent reduction from 1990 for the San Joaquin Valley NAA; and a phase-in of the reductions for the Ventura NAA, with a final reduction for Ventura of 20 percent from 1990 by 2012. These goals are the same as the VOC regulation benchmarks specified in 3 CCR

section 6452.2.

The 2010 pesticide VOC emissions for all five NAAs complied with the SIP goals and VOC regulation benchmarks, ranging from 18 to 84 percent less than emissions in the 1990 base year. Relative to 2009, pesticide VOC emissions in 2010 increased by 12 to 60 percent, depending on

the NAA.

Consistent with the regulations, the Department of Pesticide Regulation has established a fumigant limit for the Ventura NAA. Based on the emission data for 2010, the fumigant limit for May 1 –October 31, 2012 is 942,000 pounds (2.56 average tons/day) of emissions. As specified by 3 CCR section 6452.3, the Ventura county agricultural commissioner has several options to enforce the fumigant limit.Interested Parties March 29, 2012 Page 2

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Mr. Randy Segawa, Environmental Program Manager, at 916-324-4137.

Sincerely,

Original Signed by

Charles M. Andrews

Associate Director

916-445-3984
EXHIBIT 10.3


                             SPECIAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT


TO:     Talk Visual Corporation

FROM:   Howard Hacker

RE:     Talk Visual Corporation ("TVCP") sale to Howard Hacker
                The sale by TVCP of 100 common shares and 500,000 preference
                shares in the capital of The Ontario International Property
                Corporation ("TOIPC")



In connection with the above referenced sale and a Purchase Agreement dated May
10, 2001, the undersigned acknowledges that there is no indebtedness due from
TVCP to TOIPC.



DATED at Toronto, Ontario this 16th day of May, 2001.




                                        )
                                        )
------------------------------          )       -----------------------------
Witness                                 )       HOWARD M. HACKER
# Official Journal L 440/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 440 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6330 December 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 440

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6330 December 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Agreement between the European Atomic Energy Community and the Government of the Republic of India for research and development cooperation in the field of the peaceful uses of nuclear energy | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Agreement between the European Atomic Energy Community and the Government of the Republic of India for research and development cooperation in the field of the peaceful uses of nuclear energy

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Fourt h Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 29, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00804

- CR

Isidro Juan FLORES, Appellant

v.

The State of TEXAS, Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR5527 Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Isidro Juan Flores entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which Flores pleaded nolo contendere to sexual assault of a child. The trial court imposed sentence in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “ is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal. ” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). Flores timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk ’ s record, which includes the trial court ’ s r ule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea bargain agreement, has been filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “ if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appea l has not been made part of the record. ” Id

.

The clerk ’ s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record also appears to support the trial court ’ s certification that Flores does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk ’ s record to determine whether trial court ’ s certifi cation is accurate).

Flores is hereby given notice that this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to r ule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless an amended certification showing that he has the right to appeal is made part of the appellate record by January 19, 2017

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04

- 03

- 00176

- CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref ’ d) (not designated for publication).We order all appellate deadlines suspended until further order of the court. We further

order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and the court

reporter

.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affix ed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of December, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 

### 2022 KW 0454 VERSUS MARION DALE JONES 

### JUNE 21, 2022

In Re: Marion Dale Jones, applying 

### for supervisory writs,



### 20th Judicial District Court, Parish of West Feliciana, No. 

### 22-WCR-083.
BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., GUIDRY AND WOLFE, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. The trial court lacked jurisdiction. 

### Relator' s claim is in the nature of a request for postconviction relief, which must be filed 

### in the parish of conviction. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 925; State v. Ricks, 

### 2018-0071 ( La. 

### App. 1st Cir. 

### 3/ 6/ 18), 

### 2018 WL 1168558 ( unpublished). VGW JMG EW

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

# 01 .C. DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
EXHIBIT 23.1CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consentto the incorporation by reference of our reports dated March 8, 2006, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements of Human Genome Sciences, Inc., Human Genome Sciences, Inc.management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Human Genome Sciences, Inc. includedin the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005, in the followingRegistration Statements:   (1) Registration Statement Number 333-85319 on Form S-3(2) Registration Statement Number 333-96387 on Form S-3(3) Registration Statement Number 333-33252 on Form S-3(4) Registration Statement Number 333-36384 on Form S-3(5) Registration Statement Number 333-44798 on Form S-8(6) Registration Statement Number 333-45272 on Form S-3(7) Registration Statement Number 333-47292 on Form S-3(8) Registration Statement Number 333-66670 on Form S-8(9) Registration Statement Number 333-89392 on Form S-8(10) Registration Statement Number 333-104219 on Form S-8(11) Registration Statement Number 333-121724 on Form S-3(12) Registration Statement Number 333-123472 on Form S-3(13) Registration Statement Number 333-128874 on Form S-3/s/ Ernst & Young LLPMcLean, Virginia
§ 712.11 What requirements apply to subsidiary CUSOs? ( a ) *FCUs investing in a CUSO with a subsidiary CUSO.* FCUs may only invest in or loan to a CUSO, which has a subsidiary CUSO, if the subsidiary CUSO satisfies all of the requirements of this part. The requirements of this part apply to all tiers or levels of a CUSO's structure.
( b ) *FISCUs investing in a CUSO with a subsidiary CUSO.* FISCUs may only invest in or loan to a CUSO which has a subsidiary CUSO, if the subsidiary CUSO complies with the following: ( 1 ) All applicable state laws and rules regarding CUSOs; and
( 2 ) All of the requirements of this part that apply to FISCUs, which are listed in § 712.1. The requirements of this part that apply to FISCUs apply to all tiers or levels of a CUSO's structure.
( c ) For purposes of this section, a subsidiary CUSO is any entity in which a CUSO has an ownership interest of any amount, if that entity is engaged primarily in providing products or services to credit unions or credit union members.
[78 FR 72549, Dec. 3, 2013]
221201 ORD RE CHF STATUS REPORT.DOCX VERSION DECEMBER 1, 2022 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER ADJOURNING HEARING CONCERNING COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION OF 

P.R. INC.’S MOTION FOR ALLOWANCE AND PAYMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE

The Court has received and reviewed the Status Report Concerning Community 

Health Foundation of P.R. Inc.’s Motion for Allowance and Payment of Administrative Expense

(Docket Entry No. 22932 in Case No. 17-3283)2 (the “Status Report”). Through the Status 

Report, the Parties3 request entry of an order adjourning the Motion. (Status Report ¶ 3.) 

Accordingly, the Motion will be heard in connection with the omnibus hearing scheduled for 

February 1, 2023.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 1, 2022

 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN 

United States District Judge

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number 

and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are 

the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits 

of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto 

Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the 

Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3566-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority 

(“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK5523-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case numbers are listed as 

Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

2 All docket entry references herein are to the docket of Case No. 17-3283. 

3 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meaning given to them in the Status 

Report.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22952 Filed:12/01/22 Entered:12/01/22 11:33:44 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
# C_2018046EN.01000301.xml

| 8.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/3

---

Information notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority based on Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Repeal of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(2018/C 46/03)

| Member State | Norway |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Værøy — Bodø v.v. |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 August 2014
  (announced on 5 September 2013 in OJ C 256 and EEA Supplement No 50/2013) |
| Date of repeal | 1 August 2019 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | Ministry of Transport and Communications |
| PO Box 8010 Dep |
| N-0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |
| Tel. +47 22248353 |
| Email: postmottak@sd.dep.no |

Member State

Norway

Route concerned

Værøy — Bodø v.v.

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 August 2014

(announced on 5 September 2013 in OJ C 256 and EEA Supplement No 50/2013)

Date of repeal

1 August 2019

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

Ministry of Transport and Communications

PO Box 8010 Dep

N-0030 Oslo

NORWAY

Tel. +47 22248353

Email: postmottak@sd.dep.no

---
#### CHITTENDEN, ASSIGNEE *v.*ENSIGN.

Promissory note — condition not to sue lor a time, prima facie Jawful.

A note to pay $200 and interest in thirty days with a proviso, that if the payer is not found within two hundred miles of the place of giving the note, he shall not be sued until t'ne lapse of five years from the date, is not prima facie unlawful or restrictive of trade.

Assumpsit upon the following note: ‘Warren, 21st of November, 1832. For value received I promise to pay to D. L. Morly, or his order, the sum of two hundred dollars and interest, in thirty days from date. The condition of this note is such, that if I am not to be found in the bounds of two hundred miles of this place, the above note is not to he sued for the term of five years from date, it bearing interest from date, and after five years it shall be valid any where within the United States. *Wm.*Ensign.’ Plea non assumpsit.

Knight, for the plaintiff,

read the note in evidence, and proved that the defendant was seen here before the writ issued, and was personally served with the writ, which was issued on the 19th of March, 1833.

Newton, contra,

contended that the. contract was invalid.

Wright, J.

The only question presented to the Courtis, whether the note in evidence imposes a legal obligation upon the defendant to pay. It is a note to pay $200 with interest in thirty days for value received. But there is annexed to it a conditional stipulation, that if the maker should not be found within two hundred miles of Warren, he should not be sued short of five years. We are not told why this stipulation vitiates the contract, but are asked to take it so on the face of it. Why? Is .it against law or good morals for a man to stipulate with his creditor, that in case he should be two hundred miles away from home, or the place of payment, he shall not be embarrassed by suit, but left free for five years. We do not see the *722immorality or unlawfulness of such an agreement. It does not even restrict trade — on the contrary, it encourages it, by leaving the defendant free to trade in distant parts without molestation, though it subjects him to pay, when he returns home, or after five years, at all events. If this is an unlawful agreement, the defendant can show it to be so — at present, its unlawfulness is not manifest.

Judgment for the plaintiff.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10171]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB-C(M1).
    Date: May 3-5, 2000.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency San Francisco, 5 Embarcadero Center, San 
Francisco, CA 94111.
    Contact Person: Dan E. Matsumoto, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Natcher Building, Room 
6AS37B, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, 
(301) 594-8894.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: April 17, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-10171 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.19(b)


Administrative Services Agreement between Southern Energy Resources, Inc. and
Southern Energy Chalk Point, LLC dated as of December 19, 2000

Administrative Services Agreement between Southern Energy Resources, Inc. and
Southern Energy D.C. O&M, LLC dated as of December 19, 2000
#### § 724.1 Federal credit unions acting as trustees and custodians of certain tax-advantaged savings plans.

A federal credit union is authorized to act as trustee or custodian, and may receive reasonable compensation for so acting, under any written trust instrument or custodial agreement created or organized in the United States and forming part of a tax-advantaged savings plan which qualifies or qualified for specific tax treatment under sections 223, 401(d), 408, 408A and 530 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 223, 401(d), 408, 408A and 530), for its members or groups of its members, provided the funds of such plans are invested in share accounts or share certificate accounts of the Federal credit union. Federal credit unions located in a territory, including the trust territories, or a possession of the United States, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, are also authorized to act as trustee or custodian for such plans, if authorized under sections 223, 401(d), 408, 408A and 530 of the Internal Revenue Code as applied to the territory or possession under similar provisions of territorial law. All funds held in a trustee or custodial capacity must be maintained in accordance with applicable laws and rules and regulations as may be promulgated by the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary of the Treasury, or any other authority exercising jurisdiction over such trust or custodial accounts. The federal credit union shall maintain individual records for each participant which show in detail all transactions relating to the funds of each participant or beneficiary.

[55 FR 30211, July 25, 1990, as amended at 63 FR 14026, Mar. 24, 1998; 65 FR 10934, Mar. 1, 2000; 69 FR 45238, July 29, 2004]
§ 121.1113 Fuel tank system maintenance program. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (g) of this section, this section applies to transport category, turbine-powered airplanes with a type certificate issued after January 1, 1958, that, as a result of original type certification or later increase in capacity, have— ( 1 ) A maximum type-certificated passenger capacity of 30 or more, or
( 2 ) A maximum payload capacity of 7500 pounds or more.
( b ) For each airplane on which an auxiliary fuel tank is installed under a field approval, before June 16, 2008, the certificate holder must submit to the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office proposed maintenance instructions for the tank that meet the requirements of Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 (SFAR 88) of this chapter.
( c ) After December 16, 2008, no certificate holder may operate an airplane identified in paragraph (a) of this section unless the maintenance program for that airplane has been revised to include applicable inspections, procedures, and limitations for fuel tanks systems.
( d ) The proposed fuel tank system maintenance program revisions must be based on fuel tank system Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) that have been developed in accordance with the applicable provisions of SFAR 88 of this chapter or § 25.1529 and part 25, Appendix H, of this chapter, in effect on June 6, 2001 (including those developed for auxiliary fuel tanks, if any, installed under supplemental type certificates or other design approval) and that have been approved by the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office.
( e ) After December 16, 2008, before returning an aircraft to service after any alteration for which fuel tank ICA are developed under SFAR 88 or under § 25.1529 in effect on June 6, 2001, the certificate holder must include in the maintenance program for the airplane inspections and procedures for the fuel tank system based on those ICA.
( f ) The fuel tank system maintenance program changes identified in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section and any later fuel tank system revisions must be submitted to the Principal Inspector for review and approval.
( g ) This section does not apply to the following airplane models: ( 1 ) Bombardier CL-44
( 2 ) Concorde
( 3 ) deHavilland D.H. 106 Comet 4C
( 4 ) VFW-Vereinigte Flugtechnische Werk VFW-614
( 5 ) Illyushin Aviation IL 96T
( 6 ) Bristol Aircraft Britannia 305
( 7 ) Handley Page Herald Type 300
( 8 ) Avions Marcel Dassault—Breguet Aviation Mercure 100C
( 9 ) Airbus Caravelle
( 10 ) Lockheed L-300
[Amdt. 121-336, 72 FR 63411, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended by Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 121-380, 83 FR 9173, Mar. 5, 2018]