alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HOUNSFORD *v.*FISHER.

Covenant — mutual covenants — demurrer.

If one contracts for the purchase of articles to be thereafter delivered, *for which*he agrees *to*pay, &c. the covenants are mutual, and either party wishing to sue, must perform, or tender performance on his part.

Where the plaintiff demurs to a plea which is bad, and his declaration is bad also, the judgment will be against him.

Covenant, on a contract by which Fisher agreed to deliver Hounsford on the 17th January, 1832, four stallions, Sir Alfred, Robin Redbreast, Friendly Tiger, and Black Fox, *for which*Hounsford agreed to make Fisher a déed for the exclusive right to make and vend the *revolving worker,*in certain counties, and the parties bound themselves in a penalty of $700 to perform the contract.

Plea, that Fisher on the day named in the *contract, was*ready at the place and ready to deliver the horses on receiving the deed, but the plaintiff did not deliver a valid deed.

To this plea there is a general demurrer, which is joined.

*Starr,*for the plaintiff)

insisted, that the only question was, whether the covenant to deliver the horses *depended*upon tbe conveyance of the patent right, or they were *independent*covenants. He cited 5 *Wend. R.*496; 1 *Saund R.*320, *n.*4; 2 *Sel. N. P.*37S; 2 *II. Black.*389; 2 *John. R.*272; 10 *John. R.*203; 6 *Cowen R.*29S; *Doug.*690.

*581
      *Fox,*contra,

cited *Doug.*686, 691; 1 *T. R.*645;-6 *T. R.*668; 10 *John. R.*205; 1 *O. R.*17,18, 341; 1 *Pet. R.*465; 4 *T. R.*761; 12 *John. R.*209; 5 *Cowen R.*405, 6; 2 *John. R.*272, 387; 2 *Hy. Blk.*389; 2 *B.fy P.*447; 5 *John. R.*182; 6 *East. R.*203; 6 *Cowen R.*296.

Wright, J.

We think these covenants mutual; the acts to be done are simultaneous, and the act of each is the entire consideration for the act of the other. In such cases, neither party can sue without first performing, or offering to perform, his part of the covenants: (1 *Saund. R.*320; *Doug. R.*684, 91; 4 *T. R.*761; 6 *T. R.*665; 2 *John. R.*207; 5 *John. R.*145, 179; 10 *John. R.*203, 209, 266; 3 *John. R.*146; 1 Caines’ *R.*45; 6 *Cowen R.*624; 12 *John. R.*209;. 4 *Day R.*313; 6 *Bin. R.*24; 2 *Hy. Blk.*123; 5 *East. R.*107; 8 *Taimt. R.*62; 5 *T. R.*409.) The plea is therefore bad, but as the declaration has the same defect, the demurrer must be overruled.

Plaintiff had leave to withdraw and amend.
#### SHELDON *v.*SIMONDS.

Vendee’s protection against incumbrances — attachment—garnishee—setoff—substitutionjudgment in error.

Where one purchases land and takes a conveyance, giving his note for part of the purchase-money, if the land is incumbered he may pay the incumbrance and set it off against his note.

And if he be garnisheed as the debtor of his vender, the attaching creditor only takes the-place of the vender, and cannot compel payment unless the incumbrance is removed.

The Court of Error reversing a judgment of the Common Pleas may render such judgment as the Common Pleas should have rendeted.

Error to the Common Pleas. Simonds sued out a writ of attachment against one J. S. an absconding debtor, in January, 1832. The 1st of February, 1832, Sheldon was summoned in as garnishee, who answered, denying his indebtedness. Final judgment was had on the attachment against J. S. the 23d June, 1832 — after which proceedings were had to subject Sheldon, notwithstanding his denial of indebtedness. On the trial of the issue made up under the statute, it appeared in evidence that Sheldon purchased a piece of land of J. S. took a deed, paid most of the purchase-money, and gave a note for the balance, some time before the attachment. *725After the note was given, Sheldon discovered there was a judgment against J. S. which bound the land. In December, 1831, execution upon the judgment was levied upon the land; but before the sale or payment of the judgment, the summons was served on Sheldon as garnishee of the debt due by the note for the balance of the purchase. In March, 1832, Sheldon to disencumber the land and perfect his title, paid off the execution, which required a greater sum than was due J. S. on his note. On this state of fact, the Court of Common Pleas was of opinion the law was with the attaching creditor, and gave judgment against Sheldon for the amount of his note to J. S. and interest. To reverse which this writ is brought.

Loomis, for the plaintiff in error.

*McConnel,*contra.

Wright, J.

The simple question here is, was Sheldon when summoned in as garnishee indebted to J. S. the defendant in attachment? The purchase he made was of the land; for that he gave his note. The conveyance to him of this land was subject to the lien of another for a greater sum than was due of the purchase-money. In justice and equity, then, he owed nothing until the incumbrance was removed, and J. S. could not, though the note was over due, compel him to pay without discharging the incumbrance — without that, there was a failure of consideration. The attaching creditor by operation of law was substituted to his debtor’s rights — stood in his shoes. He acquired no *new right.*If then this incumbrance and payment would have been good against J. S. it was equally good against Simonds. The judgment of the Common Pleas is reversed, and final judgment is rendered here against Simonds for costs, that being the judgment the Common Pleas should have rendered.
Exhibit 99.2

                Certification by the Principal Financial Officer
          Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         I, Eric Bello, Treasurer (principal financial officer) of Quipp, Inc.,
a Florida corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my
knowledge:

         (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      * * *




/s/ Eric Bello
--------------
Eric Bello
Treasurer (principal financial officer)

Date:    November 12, 2002
```

[110th Congress Public Law 63]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ063.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 566]]

Public Law 110-63
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
561 Kingsland Avenue in University City, Missouri, as the ``Harriett F. 
  Woods Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Aug. 9, 2007 -  [H.R. 1617]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. HARRIETT F. WOODS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 561 Kingsland Avenue in University City, Missouri, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Harriett F. Woods Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Harriett F. 
Woods Post Office Building''.

    Approved August 9, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1617:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            May 14, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Dexter R. Yager, Sr., the General Partner of DRY Limited Partnership, a
General Partner of Yager/Kuester Public Fund Limited Partnership, certify that
(i) the Form 10-Q Report of Yager/Kuester Public Fund Limited Partnership for
the quarter ending March 31, 2003 to which this certification is attached fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Form 10-Q
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Yager/Kuester Public Fund Limited Partnership.

|     |  |         |  |     |  |                         
|---- |  | ------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------
|Date |  | 5/14/03 |  | By: |  | /s/ Dexter R. Yager, Sr.
|     |  |         |  |     |  |                         
|     |  |         |  |     |  | Dexter R. Yager, Sr.
§ 622.78 Suspension, prohibition or removal. ( a ) *Content.* The Board may serve a notice of suspension or prohibition or order of removal upon a director, officer or other person participating in the conduct of the affairs of an institution. A copy of such notice or order shall also be served upon the institution, whereupon the individual concerned shall immediately cease service to the institution or participation in the affairs of the institution. Any notice or order shall indicate the basis for the suspension, prohibition, or removal and shall inform the individual of the right to request in writing, within 30 days of being served with such notice or order, an opportunity to show at an informal hearing that continued service to or participation in the conduct of the affairs of the institution does not, or is not likely to, pose a threat to the interests of the institution's shareholders or the investors in Farm Credit System obligations or threaten to impair public confidence in the institution or the Farm Credit System.
( b ) *Service.* A notice or order of suspension, removal or prohibition may be served by personal service or by certified mail with a return receipt to the last known address of the person being served.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**185 KA 14-00194**  PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

AMANDA M. HENRY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (LAURA T. BITTNER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S. Farkas, J.). rendered July 12, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]). The record establishes that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived her right to appeal ( see generally People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256), and that valid waiver encompasses her challenge to the severity of the sentence ( see generally People v Lococo , 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v Hidalgo , 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: March 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
# Euroopa Liidu C 464A/17.

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 464A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 64. aastakäik17. november 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 464A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

64. aastakäik17. november 2021

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | Parandused |
| 2021/C 464 A/01 | Teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni peadirektoraat — Teade peanõuniku ametikoha täitmise kohta – Euroopa Innovatsiooninõukogu nõuandekogu president (ajutine teenistuja – palgaaste AD 14) — COM/2021/10408, parandus ( ELT C 432 A, 26.10.2021 ) | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

Parandused

2021/C 464 A/01

Teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni peadirektoraat — Teade peanõuniku ametikoha täitmise kohta – Euroopa Innovatsiooninõukogu nõuandekogu president (ajutine teenistuja – palgaaste AD 14) — COM/2021/10408, parandus ( ELT C 432 A, 26.10.2021 )

( ELT C 432 A, 26.10.2021 )

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

Parandused

| 17.11.2021 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 464/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2021

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 464/1

---

Teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni peadirektoraat — Teade peanõuniku ametikoha täitmise kohta – Euroopa Innovatsiooninõukogu nõuandekogu president

(ajutine teenistuja – palgaaste AD 14)

COM/2021/10408, parandus

(
  Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 432 A, 26. oktoober 2021
  )

(2021/C 464 A/01)

Leheküljel 5 pealkirja „Avalduse esitamise tähtpäev“ all esimeses lõigus

| asendatakse | „Avalduse esitamise tähtpäev on 26. november 2021 kell 12.00 päeval Brüsseli aja järgi. Hiljem ei ole kandideerimisavaldust enam võimalik esitada.“ |
| --- | --- |

asendatakse

„Avalduse esitamise tähtpäev on 26. november 2021 kell 12.00 päeval Brüsseli aja järgi. Hiljem ei ole kandideerimisavaldust enam võimalik esitada.“

| järgmisega: | „Avalduse esitamise tähtpäev on 17. detsember 2021 kell 12.00 päeval Brüsseli aja järgi. Hiljem ei ole kandideerimisavaldust enam võimalik esitada.“ |
| --- | --- |

järgmisega:

järgmisega

„Avalduse esitamise tähtpäev on 17. detsember 2021 kell 12.00 päeval Brüsseli aja järgi. Hiljem ei ole kandideerimisavaldust enam võimalik esitada.“

---
§ 271.1 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority and purpose.* This part establishes mechanisms for carrying out the Federal Open Market Committee's (Committee) statutory responsibilities relating to the disclosure, production, or withholding of information to facilitate the Committee's interactions with the public. In this regard, the Committee has determined that the Committee, or its delegees, may disclose exempt information of the Committee, in accordance with the procedures set forth in this part, whenever it is necessary or appropriate to do so in the exercise of any of the Committee's authorities, including but not limited to authority granted to the Committee in the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, and section 12A of the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C. 263. The Committee has determined that all such disclosures made in accordance with the rules and procedures specified in this part are authorized by law. This part also sets forth the categories of information made available to the public, the procedures for obtaining information and records, the procedures for limited release of exempt information, and the procedures for protecting confidential business information.
( b ) *Scope.* ( 1 ) Subpart A of this part contains general provisions and definitions of terms used in this part.
( 2 ) Subpart B of this part implements the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552).
( 3 ) Subpart C of this part sets forth the procedures with respect to subpoenas, orders compelling production, and other process.
|  | 1.  |  The      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Form      10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2.  |  The      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materials      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      31,  2009 |   | /s/      Minesh Patel                                                   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                            |   | Minesh      Patel, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating  Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3542 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3542

 To extend for 6 months the period for which chapter 12 of title 11 of 
                  the United States Code is reenacted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 2003

   Ms. Baldwin (for herself, Mr. Smith of Michigan, and Mr. Holden) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend for 6 months the period for which chapter 12 of title 11 of 
                  the United States Code is reenacted.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protection of Family Farmers Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. SIX-MONTH EXTENSION OF PERIOD FOR WHICH CHAPTER 12 OF TITLE 11, 
              UNITED STATES CODE, IS REENACTED.

    (a) Amendments.--Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law 
105-277 (11 U.S.C. 1201 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``January 1, 2004'' each place it appears 
        and inserting ``July 1, 2004''; and
            (2) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``June 30, 2003'' and inserting 
                ``December 31, 2003''; and
                    (B) by striking ``July 1, 2003'' and inserting 
                ``January 1, 2004''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) take 
effect on January 1, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

February 20, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00086

- CV

In the Interest of Y.G.B., A Child,

Appellant/s From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 00166 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On January 21, 2014

, the trial court signed an order terminating A ppellant’s rights to h is

c hild ren Y.G.B. On February 4 , 2014, Appellant filed a notice of accelerated appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2 6.1(b)

. T he reporter’s record was due on February 14, 2014

. See id. R. 35.1(b).

On February 13, 2014, court reporter L. Kayleen Rivera filed a notification of late
reporter ’ s record. She indicated that she had not received a request for a reporter’s record in this appeal, and did not provide a date by which the record would be completed.
The reporter’s motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record is GRANTED. The reporter’s record must be filed with this court by February 24, 2014

. See id. R. 35. 3(c) (limiting an extension in an accelerated appeal to ten days).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of February, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than November 3, 2009.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

*1. The Bonita M. Hegemann Irrevocable Trust*, Newman Grove, Nebraska, and Bonita M. Hegemann, Lindsay, Nebraska, and James B. Hegemann, Newman Grove, Nebraska, as trustees; to acquire voting shares of Lindsay State Company, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Bank of Lindsay, both of Lindsay, Nebraska.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 14, 2009.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-25045 Filed 10-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S