alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
For the twelve months ended August 31, 1998
(This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K
 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements).
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Aug-31-1998          
<PERIOD-END>                                Aug-31-1998                         
<CASH>                                       87,349,220                             
<SECURITIES>                                 32,045,300           
<RECEIVABLES>                                60,804,504<F1>      
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0           
<INVENTORY>                                  77,726,569           
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            269,555,881           
<PP&E>                                       56,697,411<F2>      
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0           
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              339,357,697           
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        48,912,397           
<BONDS>                                               0<F3>    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0           
<PREFERRED>                                           0           
<COMMON>                                        721,395           
<OTHER-SE>                                  289,339,792           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                339,357,697           
<SALES>                                     530,741,068           
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            530,741,068           
<CGS>                                       223,230,942           
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               223,230,942                                
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            201,655,313          
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0          
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              218,637          
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             110,253,574          
<INCOME-TAX>                                 40,077,947          
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          70,175,627          
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0          
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0          
<CHANGES>                                             0                   
<NET-INCOME>                                 70,175,627       
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.99    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.95 
<FN>
  F1 - Net of allowance.
  F2 - Net of accumulated depreciation.
  F3 - Includes Long-term obligations.
</FN>   
                                           

</TABLE>
Exhibit E 

Third Interim Fee Period (October 1, 2022 through January 31, 2023)

Total Invoiced

Date Submitted Monthly Period Covered Professional Fees Low High

11/18/2022 10/01/22 ‐ 10/31/22 $6,478.50 $117,390.00 $180,600.00

1/11/2023 11/01/22 ‐ 11/30/22 $32,805.00 $29,306.00 $146,528.00

1/20/2023 12/01/22 ‐ 12/31/22 $41,933.00 $67,096.00 $201,288.00

3/7/2023 01/01/23 ‐ 01/31/23 $52,898.50 $92,025.00 $399,090.00

$134,115.00 $305,817.00 $927,506.00

Budget Range

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23811-5 Filed:03/15/23 Entered:03/15/23 18:01:30 Desc:

Exhibit E Page 1 of 1
§ 614.4070 Loans and chartered territory—Farm Credit Banks, agricultural credit banks, Federal land bank associations, Federal land credit associations, production credit associations, and agricultural credit associations. ( a ) A bank or association chartered under title I or II of the Act may finance eligible borrower operations conducted wholly within its chartered territory regardless of the residence of the applicant.
( b ) A bank or association operating under title I or II of the Act may finance the operations of a borrower headquartered and operating in its territory even though the operation financed is conducted partially outside its territory, provided notice is given to all Farm Credit institutions providing similar credit in the territory(ies) in which the operations being financed are conducted. A bank or association operating under title I or II of the Act may lend to a borrower headquartered outside its territory to finance eligible borrower operations that are conducted partially within its territory and partially outside its territory only if the concurrence of Farm Credit institutions providing similar credit for the territories in which the operations are conducted is obtained.
( c ) A bank or association chartered under title I or II of the Act may finance eligible borrower operations conducted wholly outside its chartered territory, provided such loans are authorized by the policies of the bank and/or association involved, do not constitute a significant shift in loan volume away from the bank or association's assigned territory, and are made and administered in accordance with paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this section. ( 1 ) If a loan is made to an eligible borrower whose operations are conducted wholly outside the chartered territory of the lending bank or association, the lending institution shall obtain concurrence of all Farm Credit institutions providing similar credit in the territory(ies) in which the operation being financed is conducted.
( 2 ) Loans to finance eligible borrower operations conducted wholly outside a bank's or association's territory shall be appropriately designated by the bank or association to provide adequate identification of the number and volume of such loans, which shall be monitored by the bank or association.
( d ) A bank or association chartered under title I or II of the Act may finance eligible borrower operations conducted wholly or partially outside its chartered territory through the purchase of loans from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in compliance with § 614.4325(b)(3), provided: ( 1 ) Notice is given to the Farm Credit System institution(s) chartered to serve the territory where the headquarters of the borrower's operation being financed is located; and
( 2 ) After loan purchase, additional financing of eligible borrower operations complies with paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section.
[55 FR 24882, June 19, 1990, as amended at 76 FR 30250, May 25, 2011]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52513-52514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24475]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA).

ACTION: Notice of open Federal Advisory Committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the location, date, 
time and agenda for the first quarter meetings of the National Small 
Business Development Center (SBDC) Advisory Board.

DATES: The meetings for the fourth quarter will be held on the 
following dates:
    Tuesday, October 20, 2009 at 1 p.m. EST.
    Tuesday, November 17, 2009 at 1 p.m. EST.
    Tuesday, December 15, 2009 at 1 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: These meetings will be held via conference call.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), SBA announces the 
meetings of the National SBDC Advisory Board. This Board provides 
advice and counsel to the SBA Administrator and Associate Administrator 
for Small Business Development Centers.
    The purpose of these meetings is to discuss following issues 
pertaining to the SBDC Advisory Board:


[[Page 52514]]


Follow-up on ASBDC Fall Conference
White Paper Issues
SBA Update
Member Roundtable

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The meeting is open to the public 
however advance notice of attendance is requested. Anyone wishing to be 
a listening participant must contact Alanna Falcone by Friday, October 
16th by fax or e-mail. Her contact information is Alanna Falcone, 
Program Analyst, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, Phone, 
202-619-1612, Fax 202-481-0134, e-mail, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#30515c515e5e511e56515c535f5e55704352511e575f46"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="27464b464949460941464b444849426754454609404851">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Additionally, if you need accommodations because of a disability or 
require additional information, please contact Alanna Falcone at the 
information above.

Meaghan Burdick,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-24475 Filed 10-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
p. 1


# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 88 ) IV-C-5

4 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:55AM Sheet 88of 232P. 2 

## R-87-X 2 $ 

### 5 2 $ 

# S K 3 UNITED STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION AGENCY +>. *U pqO*t ° ^ WASHINGTON , D.C. 20460 

# m£ FE

B 2m 

# %

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N
Honorabl e Pete r H . Kostmaye r Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D . C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Kostmayer : Thank yo u fo r taking th e time t o onc e agai n sen d u s you r comment s o n EPA' s propose d actio n t o contro l vapor s generate d during the refueling o f moto r vehicles . Acop yo f you r lette r wil l b e place d i n the publi c docke t fo r thi s rulemaking . A s yo u know , EP

Aha s propose d tha t thes e pollutant s b e controlle d b

ythe installatio n o f "onboard " system s o n ne * gasoline-powere d vehicles . Thi s proposa l involve s complex . an d controversia l issues , an d w e hav e spen t a grea t dea l o £ time analyzing the environmenta l an d economi c impacts . W e hel d a publi c hearing o n th e proposa l thi s pas t October , an d we expec t t o receiv e man yadditiona l comment s b yth e tim e the commen t perio d close s o n February11 , 1988 . Onc e again , than

k yo u fo r sharing you r view s o n thi s matter . The ywil l b e considere d a s we procee d wit h th e nex t phas e o f th e rulemaking . Sincerel yyours , vr\i-J-'-.r\!

_

O . :-.!* ; • ''• • r. rRichar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s VG.C. cc : Docket . A-87-1 1



## 1 

## r
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alliance Financial
Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J.
Daniel Mohr, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1)          
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 9, 2007 /s/ J. Daniel MohrName:
J. Daniel MohrTitle:
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer 31
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Aldila, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned officers of Aldila, Inc. hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Aldila, Inc.

 
| /s/ Peter R. Mathewson  |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Peter R. Mathewson      |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ Robert J. Cierzan   |   |   |
| Robert J. Cierzan       |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                         |        |        |  |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aldila, Inc. andwill be retained by Aldila, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

March15, 2006

 

----
!"#$%& '#!($

(%()!#&!#'*#!#!+ ,-.

 

 /010-/-,234 /03567)89:;9< $=

 

!((!> !'*#!#!?@ABCDE <F3,-.GHI,,0-H=

 

&J-3056 




K





L		
MNOPQRSPTUSV

3I03W+,X&5$-3.Y+/11.,X/-Z,/H01X-4[..G0-/-0

65\ 11.,X/-,0//--3G/H,0I1.3GHJG-Z./W4,I34'/[./0-,]0 '+W,-Z

344,X0/-

HH00 667^'/XZ-$--+55+$[,-6^^

-./-/+%9^9^_

I/,. ,X0-3.Y`1/[.Z/0-,]05X3I .1Z335 a^a;6b:96b

/c35 a^ad;bb96b

:5\ 11.,X/-W,..0,]/..1./H,]0W,-Z-Z/I,X&5$-3.Y5

 6 Z&J-30,-Z0,-.X/00+/.3]W,-Z/XZ&J-3e001X-,2,-.X/0[IJ/H-Z./0-43[<a=

H,],-034/XZ&J-3e04H/.-/c,H-,4,X/-,3[IJ+/0/11.,X/J.+/-Z<,=3II3W/.-Z34'[-3#,X3

<)/f[1-XG/03567)89:;9< $==< /0-3[&,],-034H/./c&9a;6=g<,,='[-3#,X3$/.0/c

,/X,]313/-,3<h!i=<)/f[1-XG/03567)89:;a< $==< /0-3[&,],-034H/./c

&;a7a=g<,,,='[-3#,X3,]ZW/G0/H/013-/-,3[-Z3,-G<hi=<)/f[1-XG/03567)89bd7

< $==< /0-3[&,],-034H/./c&9;^;=g<,2=I1.3G0#-,I-$G0-I34-Z%32I-34-Z

3II3W/.-Z34'[-3#,X3<h#$i=<)/f[1-XG/03567)89bdd< $==< /0-3[&,],-034H/.

/c&_d;d=g<2='[-3#,X3.X-,X'3W[-Z3,-G<h'#'i=<)/f[1-XG/03567)8a7;^< $==

< /0-3[&,],-034H/./c&97a7=g/H<2,='[-3#,X3'[J.,X)[,.H,]0[-Z3,-G<h')i=<)/f[1-XG

/0356_)8b:99< $==< /0-3[&,],-034H/./c&9;^6=<,-.X/0[IJ0/.,0-H/0

)/f[1-XG/0[IJ0H[-3034-W/.,I,-/-,30=5

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24041 Filed:04/20/23 Entered:04/20/23 16:00:08 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 6
 	










	
	
 !!!"#
$%


&!'()

		

)

*
"	"	$+	

, *	-./.

	



)
)


)	*
0)


	
)

		


	
1
	,-2344

2 	



		)	5

6789:; <=>?@@?7A;BC:D

*
0)
 -./.

**
0)
 /-E/FE-./.

*
"	'

"	0)


E/3E-./-

0)

 ,E-,E-./-

0)
* ,E-,E-./-

*
"	'

"	&

$
	
"

4E--E-./-

&	
 GE-,E-./F

4 	

)
)
	



)
2

F 	
	
		

	

H	

G 	
	H	
	
	
		


	
	)	
	
)
	H	

3 ")



	


		


*
"	"	$+	
)
5

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24041 Filed:04/20/23 Entered:04/20/23 16:00:08 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 6
	


 

	 	





 


 !

 ""	

#$%&' ()*(

	

%+',-./.

"0%&
--$./.

1 2
3


 4
  5/)/6.(*$*7*7

8, 5/)/6.(*$*7**

	


  
 


 

( 	


  
& #
 


%&
 
 
9
 

:
 
9




  
9  
;*




 


 	

:0
 
 
9

  

 
 
<
!=<0#
>

?@ABCDEFAGHIJHKCLAHDEMAEMDIECNNOHNAJMHPNCEQRSH

H H

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24041 Filed:04/20/23 Entered:04/20/23 16:00:08 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 6
	


	

	
	



	

 
	!"
	#

	$%
&'&'&(


#)

 *	%


	

+	%


	

,-.-/011234-.56738239:-;3,<3

=/>1?63

,0/6@3ABAC<BD<AB3EC@CA@BC3

FBDGBBG

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24041 Filed:04/20/23 Entered:04/20/23 16:00:08 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24041 Filed:04/20/23 Entered:04/20/23 16:00:08 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 6


	



		
	
	




 
!	


	
"


#
 	

	
	$

	
	%




	
	

		

	





&'	
(




$


#
 	

	
		$

	
	%




	

	

		

	


$


)*
*+,-+-,$


.
)
/


	
+

 0

 
 $





11111111111111111111111111111111


 *&$
23+
42*+
)5.&


3&.-,
)-)
,.)+.
/3,6-





Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24041 Filed:04/20/23 Entered:04/20/23 16:00:08 Desc: Main

Document Page 6 of 6
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3336 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3336

 To clarify congressional approval of certain State energy production 
                             tax practices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 17, 2003

 Mr. Gillmor introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify congressional approval of certain State energy production 
                             tax practices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENERGY PRODUCTION INCENTIVES.

    (a) In General.--A State may provide to any entity--
            (1) a credit against any tax or fee owed to the State under 
        a State law, or
            (2) any other tax incentive,
determined by the State to be appropriate, in the amount calculated 
under and in accordance with a formula determined by the State, for 
production described in subsection (b) in the State by the entity that 
receives such credit or such incentive.
    (b) Eligible Entities.--Subsection (a) shall apply with respect to 
the production in the State of--
            (1) electricity from coal mined in the State and used in a 
        facility, if such production meets all applicable Federal and 
        State laws and if such facility uses scrubbers or other forms 
        of clean coal technology,
            (2) electricity from a renewable source such as wind, 
        solar, or biomass, or
            (3) ethanol.

SEC. 2. EFFECT ON INTERSTATE COMMERCE.

    Any action taken by a State in accordance with this Act with 
respect to a tax or fee payable, or incentive applicable, for any 
period beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act shall--
            (1) be considered to be a reasonable regulation of 
        commerce, and
            (2) not be considered to impose an undue burden on 
        interstate commerce or to otherwise impair, restrain, or 
        discriminate, against interstate commerce.
                                 <all>
```
#### NYE *v.*WATT.

Bill of exceptions — record—bad practice — a court of error will not look out of the record.

A bill of exceptions should state what facts are proven, and not detail the testimony of each witness, unless the objection make it necessary.

The practice of swelling the records by copying the mere formal part of papers, or copying depositions,is to be reprobated; and in a proper case, the court will order the attorney or clerk to pay the costs.

Where the record shows other evidence to have been given which is not set out, the court of error cannot tell what it was, and reverse on account of the error of the court below, in ordering a non suit; it will not go beyond the record.

Error to the Common Pleas. Nye declared below upon a contract between him and Watt, that if Nye would complete the erection of a bridge he was then building, Watt would furnish the plank. The plaintiff assigns for breach, that he performed the work, and Watt did not furnish the plank. Plea non assumpsit.

The bill of exceptions in the record states; that on the trial, certain witnesses testified to certain matters, and sets out at length copies of sundry depositions, even to the caption, certificate and attestation; and shows that the defendant moved for a non suit, which the court ordered, being of opinion the plaintiff had not sustained his action by his evidence.

By the Court.

If the bill of exceptions showed that the testimony copied was all the evidence offered at the trial, we might regard it, even in the way stated, though it would be more correct *438to state what facts were proven, and not state what a witness declares, unless the objection be to the improper admission of irrelevant testimony. The practice of swelling records, by copying the caption and attestation of depositions, unless upon some question touching the authentication copied, cannot be too strongly reprobated, and in a proper case, we would not hesitate to order the clerk recording, or the attorney ordering it, to pay the expense. The record here shows, that other evidence was given, besides what is set out. It seems to us very probable, that the evidence should have gone to the jury; but we are not advised of that by inspecting the record. There is cause to suspect that the court erred in ordering a non suit, but as we cannot go beyond the record, we cannot affirm that they erred.

The judgment is affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DANIEL DUARTE PLANCARTE, a.k.a.

Daniel Duarte-Plancarte,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-50011

D.C. No. 3:10-cr-04069-JAH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

John A. Houston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 12, 2013** 

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Daniel Duarte Plancarte appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

FILED

MAR 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Plancarte contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to (i)

consider all of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, (ii) address his

mitigating arguments, and (iii) explain the sentence imposed. He also argues that

the court relied on an improper sentencing factor, namely the length of the sentence

imposed for a prior conviction. We review for plain error, see United States v.

Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and find none. The

record reflects that the district court properly considered the section 3553(a)

sentencing factors, including the need to deter. Moreover, the court listened to

Plancarte’s policy and mitigating arguments, and adequately explained the

sentence imposed. See United States v. Perez-Perez, 512 F.3d 514, 516-17 (9th

Cir. 2008).

Plancarte also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The

district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Plancarte’s sentence. See

Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The sentence 17 months below the

advisory Guidelines range is substantively reasonable in light of the section

3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See id. 

AFFIRMED.

2 12-50011