alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10193]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 19, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community 
Affairs Officer), 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-
2204:
    1. Island Bancorp, Inc., Edgartown, Massachusetts; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of The 
Edgartown National Bank, Edgartown, Massachusetts.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice 
President), 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. First Security Group, Inc., Chattanooga, Tennessee; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of First Central Bank of Monroe 
County, Sweetwater, Tennessee (in organization).
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Maria Villanueva, 
Consumer Regulation Group), 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105-1579:
    1. Wells Fargo & Company, San Francisco, California; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of 1st Choice Financial Corporation, 
Greeley, Colorado, and thereby indirectly acquire 1st Choice Bank, 
Greeley, Colorado.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 19, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-10193 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
II 

Calendar No. 557 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3353 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2003 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 525 Main Street in Tarboro, North Carolina, 

as the ‘‘George Henry White Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 525 Main Street in Tarboro, North Carolina, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘George Henry 

7 White Post Office Building’’. 
2 

•HR 3353 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘George Henry White Post Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 557 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3353 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. North Carolina, as the ‘‘George Henry White al Service located at 525 Main Street in Tarboro, 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported without amendment
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2491

LINDA JOY BRACEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN MOODY, Manager, Appeals and Fair Hearings, Virginia Department of Social Services,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

BOBBY RALPH, Director, Suffolk Social Services

Department,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-1133-2)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 26, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Linda Joy Bracey, Appellant Pro Se. Cheryl Anne Wilkerson, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bracey

v. Moody, No. CA-95-1133-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 17, 1995). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT F

BREAKDOWN OF COMPENSATION AND EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT AND BY 

WHETHER SERVICES WERE RENDERED IN PUERTO RICO OR OUTSIDE 

PUERTO RICO

October 2022 Fee Statement

November 2022 Fee Statement

Fees 20% Discount

Fees Requested 

to Be Paid (90%)

Expenses 

Requested to Be 

Paid (100%)

Total Fees & 

Expenses 

Requested to 

Be Paid

Total for Commonwealth

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$6,518.00 $1,303.60 $4,692.96 $0 $4,692.96

Total for PREPA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$37,970.00 $7,594.00 $27,338.40 $0 $27,338.40

Total for ERS

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total for HTA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$1,217.50 $243.50 $876.60 $0 $876.60

Grand Total $45,705.50 $9,141.10 $32,907.96 $0 $32,907.96

Fees 20% Discount

Fees Requested 

to Be Paid (90%)

Expenses 

Requested to Be 

Paid (100%)

Total Fees & 

Expenses 

Requested to Be 

Paid

Total for Commonwealth

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$16,572.00 $3,314.40 $11,931.84 $0 $11,931.84

Total for PREPA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$18,545.50 $3,709.10 $13,352.76 $0 $13,352.76

Total for ERS

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total for HTA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$922.50 $184.50 $664.20 $0 $664.20

Grand Total $36,040.00 $7,208.00 $25,948.80 $0 $25,948.80

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23808-6 Filed:03/15/23 Entered:03/15/23 16:36:49 Desc:

Exhibit F Page 1 of 2
December 2022 Fee Statement

January 2023 Fee Statement

Fees 20% Discount

Fees Requested 

to Be Paid (90%)

Expenses 

Requested to Be 

Paid (100%)

Total Fees & 

Expenses 

Requested to 

Be Paid

Total for Commonwealth

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total for PREPA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$55,344.50 $11,068.90 $39,848.04 $0 $39,848.04

Total for ERS

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$3,726.00 $745.20 $2,682.72 $0 $2,682.72

Total for HTA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

 

$115.00 $23.00 $82.80 $0 $82.80

Grand Total $59,185.50 $11,837.10 $42,613.56 $0 $42,613.56

Fees 20% Discount

Fees Requested 

to Be Paid (90%)

Expenses 

Requested to Be 

Paid (100%)

Total Fees & 

Expenses 

Requested to 

Be Paid

Total for Commonwealth

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total for PREPA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$37,050.50 $7,410.10 $26,676.36 $0 $26,676.36

Total for ERS

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$1,957.50 $391.50 $1,409.40 $0 $1,409.40

Total for HTA

(all outside of Puerto Rico)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Grand Total $39,008.00 $7,801.60 $28,085.76 $0 $28,085.76

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23808-6 Filed:03/15/23 Entered:03/15/23 16:36:49 Desc:

Exhibit F Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.311 Relevant considerations. In deciding the question of suspension, prohibition, or removal under this subpart, the NCUA Board will consider the following: ( a ) Whether the alleged offense is a crime which is punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year under state or Federal law, and which involves dishonesty or breach of trust;
( b ) Whether the continued presence of the subject individual in his or her position may pose a threat to the interests of the credit union's members because of the nature and extent of the individual's participation in the affairs of the insured credit union and/or the nature of the offense with the commission of or participation in which the individual has been charged;
( c ) Whether there is cause to believe that there may be an erosion of public confidence in the integrity, safety, or soundness of a particular credit union (either generally or in the particular locality in which the credit union is situated) if the subject individual is permitted to remain in his or her position in an insured credit union;
( d ) Whether the individual is covered by the credit union's fidelity bond and, if so, whether the bond is likely to be revoked, or whether coverage under the bond will be affected adversely as a result of the information, indictment, complaint, judgment of conviction or entry into a pretrial diversion or other similar program; and
( e ) The NCUA Board may consider any other factors which, in the specific case, appear relevant to the decision to continue in effect, rescind, terminate, or modify a suspension, prohibition, or removal order, except that it shall not consider the ultimate question of the guilt or innocence of the subject individual with regard to the crime with which he or she has been charged.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24093-1 Filed:04/28/23 Entered:05/01/23 14:52:52 Desc:

Attachment Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3663 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3663

To waive copayments and deductibles for military personnel who qualify 
  for TRICARE and use other health insurance as their primary form of 
                               coverage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2003

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To waive copayments and deductibles for military personnel who qualify 
  for TRICARE and use other health insurance as their primary form of 
                               coverage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TRICARE Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF COPAYMENTS AND DEDUCTIBLES FOR CERTAIN MEMBERS OF 
              UNIFORMED SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Any member or former member of a uniformed 
service, or dependent of such a member, who is eligible for health 
benefits under the TRICARE program under chapter 55 of title 10, United 
States Code, and who has another insurance plan or program that 
provides primary coverage for health benefits shall not be required to 
pay any copayment or annual deductible under the TRICARE program.
    (b) Regulations.--The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe 
regulations to carry out subsection (a).
    (c) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall apply with respect to 
health benefits provided after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6962

MAECHEL SHAWN PATTERSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ENNIS OATES, Superintendent,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:12-hc-02063-D)

Submitted: September 14, 2018 Decided: October 16, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KEENAN, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maechel Shawn Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Maechel Shawn Patterson, a state prisoner, seeks this court’s review of his Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the district court’s October 3, 2012, judgment in

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) proceeding. The district court has not yet issued an order 

ruling on Patterson’s Rule 59(e) motion. Thus, there is no appealable order related to that 

motion for us to review.*

 Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny 

Patterson’s motion to amend the district court’s judgment, and dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 * Patterson’s informal brief also cannot be construed as the functional equivalent 

of a notice of appeal from the October 2012 judgment, as it was not filed within the 

appeal period applicable to that judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(a)(1)(A); Smith v. Barry, 

502 U.S. 244, 248-49 (1992); see also Fed. R. App. P. 4(c) (prison mailbox rule); 

Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988) (same).
**Exhibit      21**

**Significant      Subsidiaries**

|                                                   |   |                               |   | **Name                under**       |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|                                                   |   | **State                or other**  |   | **which                subsidiary** |
|                                                   |   | **jurisdiction                of** |   | **conducts**                        |
| **Name                of Subsidiary**                  |   | **incorporation**                  |   | **business**                        |
| Isogen                International, LLC               |   | Delaware                           |   | Same                                |
| Innodata                Isogen (Private) Limited       |   | India                              |   | Same                                |
| Innodata                XML Content Factory, Inc.      |   | Philippines                        |   | Same                                |
| ESS                Manufacturing Company, Inc.         |   | Philippines                        |   | Same                                |
| Content                Online Services, Inc.           |   | Philippines                        |   | Same                                |
| Innodata                Asia Holdings, Limited         |   | Bermuda                            |   | Same                                |
| Innodata                Isogen Lanka (Private) Limited |   | Sri                Lanka           |   | Same                                |

----
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 11.1


               STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE.




                                      19
<PAGE>   2



                                                                   Exhibit 11.1

                                 EATERIES, INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Thirteen weeks         Thirteen Weeks
                                                     Ended March 31,        Ended March 30,
                                                          1996                   1997
                                                     ---------------        ---------------
<S>                                                    <C>                    <C>        
Shares for net income per share computation:

    Weighted average shares:
      Common shares outstanding
        from beginning of period                         3,745,095              3,860,630
      Common shares issued upon
        exercise of stock options                           62,996                  2,637
                                                       -----------            -----------                           
                                                         3,808,091              3,863,267

    Common stock equivalents:
      Shares issuable upon exercise
        of options and warrants                            761,983                556,983
      Assumed repurchase of outstanding
        shares under the treasury stock
        method (based on average market
        price for the quarter)                            (637,961)              (336,646)
                                                       -----------            -----------
                                                           124,022                220,337
                                                       -----------            -----------
                                                         3,932,113              4,083,604
                                                       ===========            ===========
Net income                                             $    37,279            $   228,808
                                                       ===========            ===========

Net income per share                                   $      0.01            $      0.06
                                                       ===========            ===========
</TABLE>


                                      20
§ 617.7135 What subsequent disclosures must a qualified lender make to a borrower? ( a ) *Notice of interest rate change.* ( 1 ) A qualified lender must provide written notice to a borrower of any change in interest rate on the borrower's existing loan, containing the following information: ( i ) The new interest rate on the loan;
( ii ) The date on which the new rate is effective; and
( iii ) The factors used to adjust the interest rate on the loan.
( 2 ) If the borrower's interest rate is directly tied to a widely publicized external index, a qualified lender must provide written notice to the borrower of the rate change either: ( i ) Within forty-five (45) days after the effective date of the change; or
( ii ) As part of the borrower's first regularly scheduled billing statement affected by the rate change.
( 3 ) If the borrower's interest rate is not directly tied to a widely publicized external index, a qualified lender must send written notice to the borrower of the rate change within ten (10) days after the effective date of the change.
( b ) *Notice to adjustable rate loan borrowers with interest rates directly tied to a widely publicized external index.* A qualified lender must provide the written disclosure required by § 617.7130(b)(6) to applicable borrowers who were not previously given the disclosure no later than the qualified lender's next regularly scheduled correspondence to those borrowers occurring after April 1, 2010.
( c ) *Notice of increase in stock purchase requirement.* If a qualified lender increases the amount of stock (or participation certificates) a borrower must own during the term of a loan, the lender must send a written notice to the borrower at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of the increase. The notice must state: ( 1 ) The new effective interest rate on the outstanding balance for the remaining term of the borrower's loan;
( 2 ) The date on which the new rate is effective; and
( 3 ) The reason for the increase in the borrower stock (or participation certificates) purchase requirement.
[69 FR 16459, Mar. 30, 2004, , as amended at 74 FR 67972, Dec. 22, 2009]
Big Timber

^

Billings

^

Columbus

^

Bridger

^

^

Frannie

^

Lovell

Cave and Karst Areas

Within the 

Billings Field Office 

Planning Area

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument Draft RMP / EIS

Map 46

US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Montana

 Wyoming

0 2.5 5

Map sca

1

l

0

e 1:950,

1

0

5

00

20 25

Miles

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means an information may be updated without notification.

Wyoming

T

2

S

T

8

S

R17E R29E

R105W R94W

T

57

N

Location Map

Legend Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Cave and Karst

Interstate

Highway

^ Towns

Public Lands Survey System