alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SCWC-16-0000115 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. MUSTAFA BAKER, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-16-0000115; CR. NO. 13-1-0078) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J . )



### Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on April 4, 2018, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, May 22, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000115 22-MAY-2018 07:53 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998             APR-05-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998             JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                           3,306                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,471                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,346                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    115,763                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,314                       0
<PP&E>                                          69,034                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,780                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 357,127                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,469                       0
<BONDS>                                        186,350                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,582                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,442                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   357,127                       0
<SALES>                                        172,928                  87,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               172,928                  87,784
<CGS>                                          110,861                  56,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,861                  56,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,122                   4,653
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,794)                 (1,585)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,966)                   (522)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,828)                 (1,063)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,828)                 (1,063)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT 

BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al., 

Debtors. 

PROMESA 

TITLE III 

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

(Jointly Administered) 

INFORMATIVE MOTION 

TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

JUDGE LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN: 

NOW COMES THE PLAINTIFF, through the undersigned counsel, and 

respectfully INFORMS this Court the following: 

1. On April 9, 2023, the undersigned counsel suffered a rupture of the radius bone 

in her left hand, for which she went under surgery on April 18, 2023. 

2. Throughout the process, and especially since the surgery, the undersigned 

counsel has been incapacitated to perform most personal or professional tasks without 

considerable assistance. 

3. Last night, the undersigned had the post operative appointment with her doctor, 

where she was informed that, for at least six (6) more weeks, she must limit the use of her 

left hand and remain at home as much as possible. See Exhibit 1, Medical Certificate.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24081 Filed:04/27/23 Entered:04/27/23 14:42:27 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
4. Although the undersigned anticipates no particular issues with the Reply deadline 

scheduled in this case, the present motion is submitted for this Court to take into account the 

information contained herein with respect to any further scheduling in this case.

 WHEREFORE, Gilberto Ares, et al, petitioners in case number SJ2017CV02199, 

respectfully request that the Court take note of the information contained herein and take it 

into account with respect to any scheduling in this case. 

 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. 

In San Juan, Puerto Rico this 27th day of April, 2023. 

BERKAN/Méndez 

O’Neill G-11 

San Juan, PR 00918-2301 

Tel 787-764-0814; fax 787-250-0986 

berkanmendez@gmail.com 

/s/ Judith Berkan 

 Judith Berkan 

 US DC 200803 

 Temp phone 787-399-7657 

I hereby certify that this motion is being presented through the ECF filing system 

which will automatically notify all counsel of record. 

/s/ Judith Berkan 

 Judith Berkan 

2 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:24081 Filed:04/27/23 Entered:04/27/23 14:42:27 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Linda Kay Pharis, Appellant

No. 06-13-00240-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 

2 of Parker County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

CCL1-11-00779). Opinion delivered by 

Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and 

Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to remove the 

“day to day” language. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Linda Kay Pharis, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 17, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
KUPREANOF

DOUGLAS

NAUKATI

HAINES

HOONAH

SITKA

PELICAN

ELFIN COVE

GUSTAVUS

G

U

L

F

O

F

A

LA

S

KA

DIXON ENTRANCE

HOLLIS

HYDABURG

KETCHIKAN

THORNE

BAY

CLARENCE

STRAIT

WRANGELL

PETERSBURG

CRAIG

KLAWOCK

COFFMAN 

COVE

WHALE 

PASS

EDNA

BAY

PT. BAKER 

PORT PROTECTION

SUMNER

STRAIT

PORT

ALEXANDER

KAKE

U

NITE

D

STATE

S

CANADA

FREDERICK

SOUND

TENAKEE 

SPRINGS

CHATHAM

STRAIT

ST

E

P

H

E

N

S

PAS

SAG

E

ANGOON

JUNEAU

LY

N

N

C

A

N

AL

SKAGWAY

UNITED

STATES

CANADA

YAKUTAT

YAKUTAT BAY

Yukon

Bri

Territory

tish Columbia

SAXMAN

MEYERS

CHUCK

METLAKATLA

KASAAN

Tongass National Forest

Land and Resource

Management Plan

Suitable Land

November 2015

A

l a

s

k a

Canada

Tongass

 National

 Forest

Bering Sea

Arctic Ocean

Russia

Alaska

Gulf of

DRAFT EIS

Alternative 5

United States Department of Agriculture

Forest Service

Alaska Region

Tongass National Forest

Ketchikan, Alaska

/

0 5 10 20 30 40

Miles

Document Path: R:\Projects_2014\TNF_FP_Amendment\FPAmendment08\GIS\MapProducts\DEIS\Alt5_SuitableAreas.mxd

Glacier Bay National Park

Suitable Old Growth

Suitable Young Growth

Non-development LUD

Water

Non-Federal Land

BLM-managed Land

Haines State Forest

Klondike Gold Rush National Historic Park

Development LUD
§ 615.5359 Issuance of a capital directive. ( a ) A capital directive will be served by delivery to the institution. It will include or be accompanied by a statement of reasons for its issuance.
( b ) A capital directive is effective immediately upon its receipt by the institution, or upon such later date as may be specified therein, and shall remain effective and enforceable until it is stayed, modified, or terminated by the Farm Credit Administration.
#### § 653.2 General.

The Corporation's board of directors must approve the overall risk-appetite of the Corporation and regularly monitor internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that risk-taking activities are conducted in a safe and sound manner.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          12,919
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,628
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,585
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     60,986
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          91,314
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            91,695
<LOANS>                                        214,061
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 400,165
<DEPOSITS>                                     342,346
<SHORT-TERM>                                       484
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,844
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,482
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 400,165
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,418
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,275
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   459
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                22,152
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,739
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,771
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,881
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      303
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  25
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,642
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,818
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 747

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 747.21 Failure to appear.

Failure of a respondent to appear in person at the hearing or by a duly authorized counsel constitutes a waiver of respondent's right to a hearing and is deemed an admission of the facts as alleged and consent to the relief sought in the notice. Without further proceedings or notice to the respondent, the ALJ will file with the NCUA Board a recommended decision containing the findings and the relief sought in the notice.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1012]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Docket No. RP00-30-000


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Technical Conference

January 11, 2000.
    In the Commission's order issued on November 23, 1999, the 
Commission stated that it would institute further proceedings, such as 
a technical conference, after it had an opportunity to evaluate ANR 
Pipeline Company's supplemental information concerning its proposed new 
hourly flow transportation services and the parties' comments on such 
information.
    Take notice that a technical conference will be held on Thursday, 
January 27, 2000, at 10:00 a.m., in a room to be designated at the 
offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
NE, Washington, D.C. 20426.
    All interested parties and Staff are permitted to attend.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-1012 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### §§ 606.631-606.639 [Reserved]
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
(logo)


                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Stockholder of FT Mortgage Companies:

We have  examined  management's  assertion  about FT  Mortgage  Companies'  (the
"Company")  compliance with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage  Bankers  (USAP) and that the  Company  had in effect a  fidelity  bond
policy in the amount of  $70,000,000  and an errors and omissions  policy in the
amount of $50,000,000 as of and for the year ended December 31,1998, included in
the accompanying management assertion letter.  Management is responsible for the
Company's  compliance with those minimum servicing standards and for maintaining
a fidelity  bond and errors  and  omissions  policy.  Our  responsibility  is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with
the minimum  servicing  standards and  maintenance of a fidelity bond and errors
and omissions policy based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our opinion, except for the matters disclosed therein, management's assertion
that the Company complied with the  aforementioned  minimum servicing  standards
and that the  Company  had in effect a  fidelity  bond  policy in the  amount of
$70,000,000  and an errors and omissions  policy in the amount of $50,000,000 as
of and for the year ended December 31, 1998, is fairly  stated,  in all material
respects.

Arthur Andersen, LLP

Memphis, Tennessee, February 12, 1999.
#### Parker v. Ryan

*D. Quinlan*and *P. W. Casey,*for plaintiffs.

*W. Koch,*for defendants.

January 15, 1957.

Knight, P. J.,

Joseph A. Parker, Jr., is a minor child of Joseph A. Parker, Sr. *437On May 12, 1956, a scooter owned and operated by Joseph A. Parker, Jr., collided with a motor vehicle owned by Prank Ryan and operated by his agent Terry Ryan.

Plaintiffs brought this action and in the complaint filed we find two counts.

In the first count, the son claims through his guardian damages for the pain and suffering he endured because of the injuries sustained in the accident.

In the second count, the father claims for medical expenses he incurred in having his son treated for his injuries and for the loss of earnings of his son.

Defendants filed a petition on which a rule was allowed to show cause why the cases should not be severed so that the minor son could be brought in as an additional defendant in the father’s case.

A responsive answer was filed and the case argued before the court en banc.

The rule must be discharged. The father’s action is derivative, he can only recover through his son and if the son is guilty of contributory negligence, the father cannot' recover. There is a dearth of cases on this point, but the law as it exists in this State is set forth in the Pennsylvania annotation of §494 of the Restatement of The Law of Torts as follows:

> “The contributory negligence of a minor child which bars its own recovery also bars the parents’ recovery for medical expenses and loss of the child’s earnings during minority. This rule is constantly accepted as settled law in Pennsylvania. Curiously enough, no ease has been found which specifically states it, but in the cases in which the courts have found that a child was guilty of contributory negligence the court has, without discussing the question of imputing the child’s negligence to the parent, denied recovery both to child and to parent, as, for example, in Rice v. Kring (1933) 310 Pa. 550, 165 A. 833. In cases in which the courts *438consider the child’s contributory negligence as a jury question, it is likewise assumed that where such negligence is found any recovery whatever against the defendant is barred. See, for example, DiMeglio v. Philadelphia & R. R. Co. (1916) 252 Pa. 391, 97 A. 476, and Tomasak v. Boro. (1930) 98 Pa. Super. Ct. 473.”

And now, January 15, 1957, the rule is discharged.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41519

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DANIEL ALANIS-GARZA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-550-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel AlanisGarza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Alanis-Garza has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 18, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41519 Document: 00513723211 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
No. 15-41519

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-41519 Document: 00513723211 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [OR-130-1020-XU; GPO-0197] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Spokane District, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Field-trip and meeting of the Eastern Washington Resource Advisory Council; May 25, 2000, Whitman and Adams Counties, Washington. 

# SUMMARY:

The Eastern Washington Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will hold a field-trip and meeting on May 25, 2000. The field-trip will commence at 9:00 a.m., at the Spokane District Office of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), 1103 N. Fancher, Spokane, WA 99212-1275. The RAC will visit BLM lands along Rock Creek in Whitman and Adams Counties formerly known as the Escure ranch. The field-trip will adjourn upon conclusion of business, but no later than 4:00 p.m. Public comments will be heard from 10:00 a.m. until 10:30 a.m. at the Escure Ranch headquarters site. This field-trip is in lieu of a trip scheduled for April 20, 2000 but canceled due to weather conditions. If necessary to accommodate all wishing to make public comments, a time limit may be placed upon each speaker. Topics to be discussed include management of the Rock Creek lands. Transportation will be provided for RAC members only. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Spokane District Office, 1103 N. Fancher Road, Spokane, Washington, 99212-1275; or call 509-536-1200.

Dated: April 21, 2000. 

Joseph K. Buesing, 

District Manager. 

[FR Doc. 00-10485 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
§ 615.5206 Permanent capital ratio computation. ( a ) The System institution's permanent capital ratio is determined on the basis of the financial statements of the System institution prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
( b ) The System institution's asset base and permanent capital are computed using average daily balances for the most recent 3 months.
( c ) The System institution's permanent capital ratio is calculated by dividing the System institution's permanent capital, adjusted in accordance with § 615.5207 (the numerator), by the risk-adjusted asset base (the denominator) as defined in § 615.5201, to derive a ratio expressed as a percentage.
[81 FR 49774, July 28, 2016]