alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**Certification Pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and15d-14of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act**

 

I certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-K/A of Aldila, Inc. (the registrant);

 

2.  Based on my knowledge,this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisannual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;

 

4.  The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”);and

 

c) presented in this annualreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.  The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Aldila’s board ofdirectors:

 

a) all significant deficienciesin the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknessesin internal controls; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.  The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or notthere were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date: April  9, 2004 | /s/ Peter  R. Mathewson |   |
|----------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|                 |  Peter R. Mathewson     |
|                 | Chief  Executive Officer     |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000796226
<NAME>                        THE LESLIE FAY COMPANY, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                   7,771
<SECURITIES>                             2,989
<RECEIVABLES>                           29,132
<ALLOWANCES>                             3,324
<INVENTORY>                             24,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        62,183
<PP&E>                                   1,335
<DEPRECIATION>                              34
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          63,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   18,221
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                    34
<OTHER-SE>                              28,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  63,594
<SALES>                                 45,258
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        45,258
<CGS>                                   33,260
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            6,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          5,670
<INCOME-TAX>                             1,901
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      3,769
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             3,769
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.92
        



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 23, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50961

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AGUSTIN QUINTERO-JASSO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-02-CR-247-1-WWJ

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Agustin Quintero-Jasso appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Quintero contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)

define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction

that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a

separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been

alleged in his indictment. Quintero maintains that he pleaded
No. 02-50961

-2-

guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under

8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the

two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for

that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Quintero acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
LTS Doc#:23433-1 Filed:01/27/23 Entered:01/30/23 

Envelope Page 1 of 1
§ 107.120 Category 2 operations: Eligibility of small unmanned aircraft and other applicant requirements. ( a ) To be eligible for use in Category 2 operations, the small unmanned aircraft must be designed, produced, or modified such that it— ( 1 ) Will not cause injury to a human being that is equivalent to or greater than the severity of injury caused by a transfer of 11 foot-pounds of kinetic energy upon impact from a rigid object;
( 2 ) Does not contain any exposed rotating parts that would lacerate human skin upon impact with a human being; and
( 3 ) Does not contain any safety defects.
( b ) The applicant for a declaration of compliance for a small unmanned aircraft that is eligible for use in Category 2 operations in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, must meet all of the following requirements for the applicant's unmanned aircraft to be used in Category 2 operations: ( 1 ) Display a label on the small unmanned aircraft indicating eligibility to conduct Category 2 operations. The label must be in English and be legible, prominent, and permanently affixed to the small unmanned aircraft.
( 2 ) Have remote pilot operating instructions that apply to the operation of the small unmanned aircraft system. The applicant for a declaration of compliance must make available these instructions upon sale or transfer of the aircraft or use of the aircraft by someone other than the applicant who submitted a declaration of compliance pursuant to § 107.160. Such instructions must address, at a minimum— ( i ) A system description that includes the required small unmanned aircraft system components, any system limitations, and the declared category or categories of operation;
( ii ) Modifications that will not change the ability of the small unmanned aircraft system to meet the requirements for the category or categories of operation the small unmanned aircraft system is eligible to conduct; and
( iii ) Instructions for how to verify and change the mode or configuration of the small unmanned aircraft system, if they are variable.
( 3 ) Maintain a product support and notification process. The applicant for a declaration of compliance must maintain product support and notification procedures to notify the public and the FAA of— ( i ) Any defect or condition that causes the small unmanned aircraft to no longer meet the requirements of this subpart; and
( ii ) Any identified safety defect that causes the small unmanned aircraft to exceed a low probability of casualty.
Exhibit 31(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C. ss.1350
               UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arnie Geller, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PREMIER EXHIBITIONS,
Inc., the registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I, along with the CFO, am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and
15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report;

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. I, along with the CFO, have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.


Date: January 21, 2005


/s/ Arnie Geller
-----------------
Arnie Geller,
President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CertificationI, Stephen Couture, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, INC.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedurespresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 

 
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: October 10, 2006   /s/ Stephen Couture Stephen Couture,  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
§ 621.7 Rule of aggregation. ( a ) When one loan to a borrower is placed in nonaccrual, an institution must immediately evaluate whether its other loans to that borrower, or related borrowers, should also be placed in nonaccrual. All loans on which a borrowing entity, or a component of a borrowing entity, is primarily obligated to the reporting institution shall be considered as one loan unless a review of all pertinent facts supports a reasonable determination that a particular loan constitutes an independent credit risk and such determination is adequately documented in the loan file. ( 1 ) A loan shall be considered an independent credit risk if a substantial portion of the loan is guaranteed as to principal and interest by a government agency.
( 2 ) Other loans shall be considered independent credit risks if and so long as: ( i ) The primary sources of repayment are independent for each loan;
( ii ) The loans are not cross-collateralized; and
( iii ) The principal obligors are different person(s) and/or entity(ies). Related loans will not be considered independent credit risks if the operations of a related borrower are so financially interdependent with the borrower's operations that the economic survival of one will materially affect the economic survival of the other, determined in accordance with § 614.4359(a)(2) of this chapter.
( b ) If the evaluation required by paragraph (a) of this section results in a determination that the borrower's other loans with the institution do not represent an independent credit risk, and full collection of such loans is not expected, then all of the borrower's loans must be aggregated and classified as nonaccrual. If such other loans represent an independent credit risk and are fully collectible, then they may remain in their current performance category.
( c ) When an institution becomes aware that a borrower has a loan that has been classified nonaccrual by any other lender, the institution must re-evaluate the credit risk in its loan to the borrower and then determine whether an independent credit risk exists.
[58 FR 48786, Sept. 20, 1993, as amended at 64 FR 34519, June 28, 1999]
**Exhibit 32.1****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**     I, Montgomery Bannerman, Chief Executive Officer of Verso Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”),do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended June 30,2006 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and  2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:October 6, 2006         /s/ Montgomery Bannerman   Montgomery Bannerman,   Chief Executive Officer
§ 121.1101 Purpose and definition. ( a ) This subpart requires persons holding an air carrier or operating certificate under part 119 of this chapter to support the continued airworthiness of each airplane. These requirements may include, but are not limited to, revising the maintenance program, incorporating design changes, and incorporating revisions to Instructions for Continued Airworthiness.
( b ) [Reserved]
[Amdt. 121-336, 72 FR 63411, Nov. 8, 2007, as amended by Docket FAA-2018-0119, Amdt. 121-380, 83 FR 9173, Mar. 5, 2018]
Ownership of Operating Subsidiaries
                                
                                
  Name of Corporation
Sundance Homes, Inc.
Rembrandt Homes, Inc.
Sundance Suburban Properties, Inc.
SAR Development, Inc.
SRLB Development, Inc.
Hometown Development, Inc.
McCarty's Mill Development, Inc.
Sutton Development, Inc.
Georgian Ct. Development, Inc.
Heartland Meadows Development, Inc.
Chicago Urban Properties, Inc.
Lake-Wells Management, Inc.
1515 South Michigan Lofts, Inc.
Erie Center Tower, Inc.
Erie Center Lofts, Inc.
Sangamon Lofts, Inc.
Marathon Center, Inc.
Matteson Development, Inc.
Walnut Point Development, Inc.
§ 111.215 Method of reporting. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 86 FR 31067 , June 10, 2021.
( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, all records required to be reported to the PRD under this subpart must be reported within 30 days of the effective date of the record, or within 30 days of the record becoming final when the record is a disciplinary action record or a separation from employment record.
( b ) Each operator conducting an operation described in § 111.1(b)(4), entity conducting a public aircraft operation, operator conducting an air tour operation under § 91.147, or a trustee for such an operator or entity must either comply with paragraph (a) of this section or report and retain pilot records in accordance with all requirements of this paragraph. ( 1 ) Operators, entities, or trustees listed in this paragraph (b) must report a record described in § 111.225, § 111.230, or § 111.235 to the PRD upon receipt of a request from a reviewing entity within 14 days, unless the record memorializes one or more of the following: ( i ) A disciplinary action that resulted in permanent or temporary removal of the pilot from aircraft operations as described in § 111.230, which must be reported in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
( ii ) A separation from employment action resulting from a termination as described in § 111.235, which must be reported in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
( 2 ) If no records are available at time of request from a reviewing entity, the operator, entity, or trustee must provide written confirmation within 14 of the days of the request to the PRD that no records are available.
( 3 ) An operator, entity, or trustee must retain a record eligible to be reported upon request under paragraph (b)(1) of this section for five years from the date of creation, unless the operator or entity already reported that record to the PRD.
( c ) For records created before June 10, 2022, and maintained in accordance with PRIA, an operator, entity, or trustee listed in paragraph (b) of this section must continue to maintain all records that would have been provided in response to a PRIA request for five years from the date of creation of the record, and must report that record upon request from a reviewing entity in accordance with paragraph (b).
[Doc. No. FAA-2020-0246, Amdt. No. 111-1, 86 FR 31060, 31067, June 10, 2021]