alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 741

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 741 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 741.9 Uninsured membership shares.

Any credit union that is insured pursuant to title II of the Act may not offer membership shares that, due to the terms and conditions of the account, are not eligible for insurance coverage. This prohibition does not apply to shares that are uninsured solely because the amount is in excess of the maximum insurance coverage provided pursuant to part 745 of this chapter.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3557

To designate the United States courthouse located at 95 Seventh Street 

in San Francisco, California, as the ‘‘James R. Browning United States 

Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2003

Ms. PELOSI (for herself, Mr. COX, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. DOOLEY of California, Mr. 

LANTOS, Ms. LOFGREN, and Ms. WOOLSEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 95 

Seventh Street in San Francisco, California, as the 

‘‘James R. Browning United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse located at 95 Seventh 

5 Street in San Francisco, California, shall be known and 

6 designated as the ‘‘James R. Browning United States 

7 Courthouse’’. 
2

•HR 3557 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘James R. Browning United 

6 States Courthouse’’.

Æ
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 7, 2013

NO. 03-13-00426-CR

Cory DeMarcos Armour, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s 

judgment: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the judgment 

of the trial court is in all things affirmed; and it appearing that the appellant is indigent and 

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified 

below for observance.
Editorial Note on Part 705
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 705 appear at 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 705.1 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) This part 705 is issued by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) under section 130 of the Federal Credit Union Act, 12 U.S.C. 1772c-1, which implements the Community Development Credit Union Revolving Loan Fund Transfer Act (Pub. L. 99-609, 100 Stat. 3475 (Nov. 6, 1986)).
( b ) This part describes how NCUA makes money available to credit unions from its Community Development Revolving Loan Fund (Fund). NCUA administers the Fund and makes both loans and technical assistance grants to credit unions in accordance with the eligibility criteria and other qualifications, subject to the terms and conditions set out in this part. All loans and technical assistance grants made under this part are subject to funds availability and NCUA's discretion.
( c ) NCUA's policy is to revolve the loan funds to credit unions as often as practical in order to achieve maximum economic impact on as many credit unions as possible.
( d ) The financial awards provided to credit unions through the Fund will better enable them to support the communities in which they operate; provide basic financial services to low-income residents of these communities, and result in more opportunities for the residents of those communities to improve their financial circumstances.
( e ) The Fund is intended to support the efforts of credit unions through loans and technical assistance grants needed for: ( 1 ) Providing basic financial and related services to residents in their communities;
( 2 ) Enhancing their capacity to better serve their members and the communities in which they operate; and
( 3 ) Responding to emergencies.
[76 FR 67587, Nov. 2, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 85112, Nov. 25, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,040,096
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,898,490
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,938,586
<PP&E>                                      91,644,762
<DEPRECIATION>                              39,073,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,940,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,799,932
<BONDS>                                     27,454,567
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  8,908,937
<COMMON>                                    37,118,643
<OTHER-SE>                                (23,469,747)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,940,817
<SALES>                                     15,011,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,702,578
<CGS>                                        7,801,249
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,106,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,971,595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,403,680)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,829,762)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,589,007)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,589,007)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.83)
        

</TABLE>
221222 SCH ORD RE LARS MOTION.DOCX VERSION DECEMBER 22, 2022 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING OF MOTION FOR PAYMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RENT

The Court has received and reviewed the Motion for Payment of Administrative 

Rent (Docket Entry No. 23143 in Case No. 17-3283, the “Motion”), filed by Luis A. Rivera 

Siaca (the “Movant”). 

Responsive papers to the Motion, if any, must be filed by January 6, 2023, at 

5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). Movant’s reply papers must be filed by January 13, 

2023, at 5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). The Court will thereafter take the Motion on 

submission, unless the Court determines that a hearing is necessary.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 22, 2022 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax 

Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3284-LTS) (Last Four 

Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation 

Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3566-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority 

(“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-BK-5523-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case 

numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23149 Filed:12/22/22 Entered:12/22/22 13:44:30 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### C. R. Ferguson, as Marshal of the City of Miami, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. H. McDonald, as Agent for the Western Union Telegraph Company, a Corporation, Defendant in Error.

Writ of error to a judgment of the Circuit Court for Dade County.

J. L. Billingsley, for Plaintiff in Error.

Writ of error dismissed on praecipe of counsel for plaintiff in error, on May 26th, 1913.
```

[House Report 106-973]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-973

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
          4392, THE INTELLIGENCE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FY 2001

                                _______
                                

  October 11, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 626]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 626, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 4392, the Intelligence 
Authorization Act for FY 2001, and against its consideration. 
The rule provides that the conference report shall be 
considered as read.

                                  

```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00828-CR

Saul Matthew CASTILLO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR10721

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED July 9, 2014.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
§ 268.602 Reports to the Commission. ( a ) The Board shall report to the Commission information concerning pre-complaint counseling and the status, processing, and disposition of complaints under this part at such times and in such manner as the Board and Commission shall agree.
( b ) The Board shall advise the Commission whenever it is served with a Federal court complaint based upon a complaint that is pending on appeal at the Commission.
( c ) The Board shall submit annually for the review and approval of the Commission written equal employment opportunity plans of action. Plans shall be submitted in the format prescribed by the Commission and shall include, but not be limited to: ( 1 ) Provision for the establishment of training and education programs designed to provide maximum opportunity for employees to advance so as to perform at their highest potential;
( 2 ) Description of the qualifications, in terms of training and experience relating to equal employment opportunity, of the principal and operating officials concerned with administration of the Board's equal employment opportunity program; and
( 3 ) Description of the allocation of personnel and resources proposed by the Board to carry out its equal employment opportunity program.
#### § 347.121 Requirements for insured state nonmember bank to close a foreign branch.

A bank must comply with the written notification requirement contained in § 303.182(d) when it closes a foreign branch.
GAS AND OIL LEASE

[Hancock Circuit Court,

May, 1896.]

Seney, Day and Price, JJ.

#### The Ohio Oil Co. and The Northwestern Ohio Natural Gas Co v. Maria Blair et al.

*M. F, Elliott*and *John Poe,*for Plaintiffs.

*George H. Phelps*and *A, Blackford,*for Defendants.

This case was heard and submitted with the case of *Maria Blair et al.*v. *The Northwestern Ohio Natural Gas Co., and the Ohio Oil*Co.

The same facts control both cases. The plaintiffs in this case set up their claim to the premises, and ask an injunction against Kelley and Harris to prevent their operations under their lease from Blairs made April 24, 1895. We come to the same conclusion as to the rights of tha parties. There is a finding for the plaintiff, injunction made perpetual. The answers and cross-petitions are dismissed, and the clerk is ordered •to cancel the lease to Kelley and Harris.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 40077 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Valentin Hernandez**

**- Colunga,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:20

- CR

- 1189

- 1

Before **Southwick, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Valentin Hernandez

- Colunga has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez

- Colunga has not filed a

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 27, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-40077 Document: 00515954574 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/27/2021No. 21

- 40077

2 response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-40077 Document: 00515954574 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/27/2021
GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
                            SURPLUS NOTE

Golden American Life Insurance Company agrees to pay Equitable of
Iowa Companies, an Iowa corporation, the sum of $25 million
($25,000,000.00) plus interest at the rate of 8.25%  per annum from
the date hereof, December 17, 1996 until paid.  In any event, this
note will mature on December 17, 2026.

This Surplus Note and accrued interest thereon shall be subordinate
to payments due to policyholders, claimant and beneficiary claims, as
well as debts owed to all other classes of debtors of Golden American
Life Insurance Company in the event of (a) the institution of
bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency or liquidation proceedings by
or against Golden American Life Insurance Company, or (b) the
appointment of a Trustee, receiver or other Conservator for a
substantial part of Golden American Life Insurance Company
properties.

Any payments made shall first apply to accrued interest, and the
balance of such payment shall apply to reduce the principal of this
Note.

Any payment of principal and/or interest made shall be subject to the
prior approval of the Delaware Insurance Commissioner.  If the
Commissioner has not approved payment of principal to retire the note
prior to its maturity date, the maturity date will be automatically
extended until such time as the Commissioner authorizes payment of
the final balance of principal.

Golden American Life Insurance Company hereby waives presentment and
notice of dishonor.

In witness whereof, Golden American Life Insurance Company has caused
this Note to be executed and delivered.


                                GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                                By:  /s/ Terry L. Kendall
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Terry L. Kendall, President and CEO


Attest by:


/s/ Myles R. Tashman
------------------------------
Myles R. Tashman
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
§ 404.24 Government contracts. ( a ) *Approval by Assistant General Counsel for Administration.* Ex-Im Bank shall not contract for the operation of a system of records or for an activity that requires access to a system of records without the express, written approval of the Assistant General Counsel for Administration.
( b ) *Contract clauses.* Any contract authorized under paragraph (a) of this section shall contain the standard contract clauses required by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR 24.104) to ensure compliance with the requirements imposed by the Privacy Act. The division within Ex-Im Bank that is responsible for technical supervision of the contract shall be responsible for ensuring that the contractor complies with the Privacy Act contract requirements.
( c ) *Contractor status.* Any contractor that operates an Ex-Im Bank system of records or engages in an activity that requires access to an Ex-Im Bank system of records shall be considered an Ex-Im Bank employee for purposes of this subpart. Ex-Im Bank shall supply any such contractor with a copy of the regulations in this subpart upon entering into a contract with Ex-Im Bank.
[64 FR 14374, Mar. 25, 1999. Redesignated at 87 FR 41034, July 11, 2022]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             BACK YARD BURGERS, INC.

I, Michael G. Webb, certify that:


1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K of Back Yard Burgers,
Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: April 1, 2004

/s/ Michael G. Webb
-------------------

Michael G. Webb
Chief Financial Officer

                                       2
,. 0 7 

------ Mv na e is James Cari~-o~ represent the Alabama Department of Environmental . ' 

Manageme ··. appreciates the opportunity to comment at today's proceedings. 

The Department has three broad comments on EPA ·s proposal: 

1. EPA's proposed rules to regulate greenhouse emissions are tantamount to setting 

energy policy for the United States. 

2. EPA is seeking to decide upon an energy policy for the nation that will have limited 

direct environmental impact but dramatic national economic impact. Such a policy 

decision is appropriately reserved for the Legislative branch of government. 

3. EPA is reaching far beyond its historical practice and very likely beyond its statutory 

authority in using measures "outside the plant boundary" to calculate the emission 

reductions States and affected sources must meet. 

In spite of representations to the contrary, the greenhouse gas emission standards proposed by 

EPA for the existing fleet of Electric Generating Units in Alabama, as well as in many other 

states, are achievable only by decommissioning coal-fired EGUs, and by dispatching generation 

to natural gas-fired capacity regardless of the cost of generation. The types and sources of fuels 

to generate electric energy, the cost of energy, the export and import of energy, the reliability of 

the electric grid and thus energy policy throughout the nation would be determined by EPA if the 

proposed greenhouse gas emission standards are implemented. 

Regarding whether Congress or EPA should set energy policy, the Alabama Department of 

Environmental Management concurs with the statement in the June 23, 2014 United States 

Supreme Court greenhouse gas ruling opinion that the Justices" .... expect Congress to speak 

clearly if it wishes to assign to an agency decisions of vast "economic and political 

significance."" EPA has stated that the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in the United 

States will be negligible compared to worldwide emissions and that the effort is essentially 

symbolic. lfthe United States is to offer a low-impact, symbolic greenhouse gas reduction 

program. hoping to spark similar actions world-wide, while incurring vast economic 

consequences, ADEM believes Congress is the appropriate institution to do so. 

ln past 11 l (d) actions, and in similar rulemakings in such areas as New Source Performance 

Standards and Maximum Achievable Control Technology standards, EPA has never ventured 

beyond tip-of~stack control or work practices to require reductions. ADEM concludes that 

EPA's only legal options for requiring reductions from existing fossil-fuel fired power plants lie 

in these two areas. Since EPA has rejected tip-of~stack controls (carbon capture and 

sequestration) tor these sources, EPA's only legal option lies in a work practice requirement 

(efficiency improvements). 

ADEM will submit more detailed comments to the docket before the deadline. 

This concludes our comments.