alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3221 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3221

To amend the War Powers Resolution to require the President to include 
post-conflict strategy in the report required under the Resolution, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2003

   Mr. Hastings of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the War Powers Resolution to require the President to include 
post-conflict strategy in the report required under the Resolution, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF POST-CONFLICT STRATEGY.

    (a) Purpose and Policy.--Section 2 of the War Powers Resolution (50 
U.S.C. 1541) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``circumstances, and to 
        the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such 
        situations'' and inserting ``circumstances, to the continued 
        use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations, and to 
        the post-conflict strategy''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Given the difficulty of post-conflict strategy, developing a 
clear plan of action at the outset is decisive to success. Such a plan 
should articulate the interests of the United States at stake, define 
the policy objectives of the United States for the introduction of 
Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent 
involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, 
and lay out the strategy for achieving these policy objectives and a 
clear division of labor regarding responsibilities for implementation 
of the plan.''.
    (b) Reporting.--Section 4(a) of the War Powers Resolution (50 
U.S.C. 1543) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in subparagraph (C) by striking the period and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(D) the post-conflict strategy.''.
    (c) Interpretation of Joint Resolution.--Section 8 of the War 
Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1547) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (2) by inserting the following new subsection:
    ``(d) For purposes of this joint resolution, the term `post-
conflict strategy' includes reconstruction, peacekeeping, peace 
enforcement, and nation-building.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 810.4 Acceptance of FFB bills for various purposes.

Federal Financing Bank bills are lawful investments and may be accepted as security for all fiduciary, trust, and public funds, the investment or deposit of which shall be under the authority or control of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or any territory or possession of the United States. They are eligible for purchase by national banks, and will be accepted at maturity value to secure public moneys.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at March 31, 1997 (Unaudited) and the Statement of Operations
for the Three Months Ended March 31, 1997 (Unaudited) and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         100,055
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  217,358
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               317,413
<PP&E>                                       8,535,904
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,945,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,908,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,297
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,900,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,908,317
<SALES>                                        247,373
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               248,246
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                97,488
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                150,758
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            150,758
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   150,758
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.78
        

</TABLE>
#### HOLT *v.*BINGHAM.

Recall of execution after appeal from a justice — appellant to serve order of recall — mal practice.

Where an appeal from a justice’s judgment is perfected after execution, it is the duty of the justice to recall the execution ; but it is not his duty to serve the order of recall; the party interested to effect the recall may serve the order himself, or get another to do it, but canuot make the justice liable if he refuse, or neglect to serve the order.

Where the appellant in such case reluse to serve notice of recall, turn out property on execu- ■ tion which is sold, he cannot recover against the justice; the law in such case is clearly against him.

Action upon the case against a justice of the peace for malfeasance in office, for not recalling an execution, after an appeal taken and perfected.

It appeared in evidence, that after execution had issued upon a judgment against 'the plaintiff, rendered by the defendant as a justice of the peace, the plaintiff entered bail for an appeal, and the justice asked him to carry a notice of the recall of the execution to the constable, which he refused. He afterwards turned out some reeds worth about twenty dollars on the execution. These the constable sold to the plaintiff’s brother-in-law for one dollar, returned so much money made, and paid it over to the justice, who afterwards gave it to-his brother-in-law for the plaintiff. The brother-in-law offered the plaintiff his reeds, but he refused to take them, but afterwards bought them of him for nineteen dollars. He also offered the plaintiff the dollar from the justice, which he refused.

*Brazee,*for the plaintiff,

contended that it was the justice’s business to recall the execution.

*Vinton,*contra.

Wright, J.

to the jury. The law makes it the duty of the justice to recall the execution. He must issue the order of recall to the *164party interested, who may either serve it himself, or get some one else to serve it for him. It is not the duty of the justice, or the court, to serve its own process, or to do the duty of the constable, or of the parties. The justice hex-e has done nó wrong; the wrong, if any, results from the plaintiff’s own refusal to deliver the notice of recall to the constable. If it were otherwise, this plaintiff would come here with bad grace to ask for damages, under the circumstances of this case. He refused to give the notice; turned out the property himself; refused to take it back when it was tendered to him, and now wants you to make the justice pay for it. If you think a party has a x’ight to do wrong himself, and make another pay him damages for it, you would find for the plaintiff. In law, the case upon the facts in evidence, is clearly with the defendant.

Verdict for the defendant, and judgment.
§ 9.17 Surrender or revocation of fiduciary powers. ( a ) *Surrender.* In accordance with 12 U.S.C. 92a(j), a national bank seeking to surrender its fiduciary powers shall file with the OCC a certified copy of the resolution of its board of directors evidencing that intent. If, after appropriate investigation, the OCC is satisfied that the bank has been discharged from all fiduciary duties, the OCC will provide written notice that the bank is no longer authorized to exercise fiduciary powers.
( b ) *Revocation.* If the OCC determines that a national bank has unlawfully or unsoundly exercised, or has failed for a period of five consecutive years to exercise its fiduciary powers, the Comptroller may, in accordance with the provisions of 12 U.S.C. 92a(k), revoke the bank's fiduciary powers.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3288 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3288

    To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to make technical 
    corrections with respect to the definition of qualifying State.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 14, 2003

Mr. Tauzin (for himself and Mr. Dingell) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to make technical 
    corrections with respect to the definition of qualifying State.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS RELATING TO THE DEFINITION OF 
              QUALIFYING STATE UNDER TITLE XXI OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY 
              ACT.

    Effective as if included in the enactment of Public Law 108-74, 
section 2105(g)(2) of the Social Security Act, as added by section 1(b) 
of such Act, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``185'' the first place it appears and 
        inserting ``184'';
            (2) by inserting ``August 1, 1994, or'' before ``July 1, 
        1995''; and
            (3) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``, or, in the case of a State that had a statewide 
        waiver in effect under section 1115 with respect to title XIX 
        that was first implemented on October 1, 1993, had an income 
        eligibility standard under such waiver for children that was at 
        least 185 percent of the poverty line and on and after July 1, 
        1998, has an income eligibility standard for children under 
        section 1902(a)(10)(A) or a statewide waiver in effect under 
        section 1115 with respect to title XIX that is at least 185 
        percent of the poverty line''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Todd Schaeffer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of MTI Technology
Corporation (the Company), certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
April 3, 2004, of the Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls over financial reporting. Date:
    
    July 1, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ TODD SCHAEFFERTodd SchaefferChief Financial Officer and Secretary
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL ALAN KIRK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1336 

[October 29, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 562011CF001536A.

Michael Alan Kirk, Avon Park, pro se. 

No appearance required for appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 651.50 Committees of the Corporation's board of directors. ( a ) *General.* No committee of the board of directors may be delegated the authority of the board of directors to amend Corporation bylaws. No committee of the board of directors shall relieve the board of directors or any board member of a responsibility imposed by law or regulation.
( b ) *Required committees.* The board of directors of the Corporation must have committees, however styled, that address risk management, audit, compensation, and corporate governance. Neither the risk management committee nor the audit committee may be combined with any other committees. This provision does not prevent the board of directors from establishing any other committees that it deems necessary or useful to carrying out its responsibilities.
( c ) *Charter.* Each committee required by this section must develop a formal written charter that specifies the scope of the committee's powers and responsibilities, as well as the committee's structure, processes, and membership requirements. To be effective, the charter must be approved by action of the full board of directors. No director may serve as chairman of more than one of the board committees required by this section.
( d ) *Frequency of meetings and records.* Each committee of the board of directors required by this section must meet with sufficient frequency to carry out its obligations and duties under applicable laws, regulations, and its operating charter. Each of these committees must maintain minutes of its meetings. The minutes must record attendance, the agenda (or equivalent list of issues under discussion), a summary of the relevant discussions held by the committee during the meeting, and any resulting recommendations to the board. Such minutes must be retained for a minimum of 3 years and must be available to the entire board of directors and to OSMO.
#### § 7.5008 Location of a national bank conducting electronic activities.

A national bank shall not be considered located in a State solely because it physically maintains technology, such as a server or automated loan center, in that state, or because the bank's products or services are accessed through electronic means by customers located in the state.
07/13/2012 15:51 FAX 2024935142 FAA -+ OMS**~001/003**

,.... ' 

### "I \ •**I·~:\ ~~,**  r··:{-', ; ..::**~~:** "f' 

### I b A 

## q: 0L! ·.: . , •'' '·'"•'I -··· J,....,,,• ··-'**~** "'- : 

### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

### WASHINGTON, D.C.

Federal Aviation Administration Complainant 

### v. 

### M & 

### R Helicopters, LLC. Respondent # 

### 2010-1211

NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM 

### THE INITIAL DECISION § 13.233

NOTICE is hereby given that Respondent, 

### M & 

### R Helicopters, 

### LLC. hereby appeals the initial decision 

### by the Honorable Richard C. Goodwin dated June 18, 2012, received 

### by first class mail 

### by Respondent on June**21~** 

### 2012 in accordance to§ 13.233.
Respectfully Submitted, MICHAEL B. SELIG 2816 Orefield Road Allentown, PA 

### 18104 610 360 3953 clune 21, 2012
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.35



June 8, 2001


Arthur A. Siciliano, Ph.D.
3 Pavia Place
Framingham, MA   01701

                    Re:  Amendment of Employment Agreement

Dear Art,

This letter agreement serves to amend the Amended Executive Employment Agreement
dated as of April 2, 2001, by and between you and PolyMedica Corporation. (the
"Company").

      Term of Employment. The Employment Period, as defined in Section 2 of the
      Amended Executive Employment Agreement, is extended to February 28, 2003.

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please indicate your agreement by signing
a copy of this letter agreement and returning it to the undersigned.

                                          Very truly yours,


                                          /s/ Steven J. Lee
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Steven J. Lee
                                          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:



/s/ Arthur A. Siciliano
----------------------------
Arthur A. Siciliano
```

[110th Congress Public Law 77]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ077.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 726]]

Public Law 110-77
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To improve the use of a grant of a parcel of land to the State of Idaho 
for use as an agricultural college, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Aug. 
                       13, 2007 -  [H.R. 3006]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE LAND GRANT.

    (a) In General.--Section 10 of the Act of July 3, 1890 (26 Stat. 
215, chapter 656) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a)'' after ``Sec. 10.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(b) Notwithstanding sections 3 through 5 of the Act of July 2, 
1862 (commonly known as the `First Morrill Act') (7 U.S.C. 303 et seq.), 
the State of Idaho may--
            ``(1) invest and manage earnings and proceeds derived from 
        land granted to the State of Idaho pursuant to subsection (a), 
        in accordance with the standards applicable to a trustee under 
        Idaho law;
            ``(2) deduct from earnings and proceeds generated from 
        granted land any expenses that a trustee is authorized to deduct 
        pursuant to Idaho law; and
            ``(3) use earnings and proceeds generated by the granted 
        land for any uses and purposes described in that Act (7 U.S.C. 
        301 et seq.) without regard to the limitations set out in 
        section 5 of that Act (7 U.S.C. 305) that prohibit the State 
        from exceeding 10 per centum on the purchase of land and 
        prohibit the State from purchasing, erecting, preserving, or 
        repairing of any building or buildings.''.

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on October 27, 1998.

    Approved August 13, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3006:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            July 30, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
----

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the

(2005/C 164/05)

THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS,

Having regard to the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Social Fund (COM(2004) 493 final — 2004/0165 (COD));

Having regard to the Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity — PROGRESS (COM(2004) 488 final — 2004/0158 (COD));

Having regard to the decision of the Commission of 15 July 2004 to consult it on this subject, under the first paragraph of Article 265 and Article 148 of the Treaty establishing the European Community;

Having regard to the decision of its President of 5 April to instruct its Commission for Economic and Social Policy to draw up an opinion on this subject;

Having regard to the Commission Communication — Third report on economic and social cohesion (COM(2004) 107 final);

Having regard to its opinion on the Third report on economic and social cohesion (CdR 120/2004 fin);

Having regard to the Commission White Paper: European Governance: a White Paper (COM(2001) 428 final);

Having regard to its opinion on the Commission White Paper: European Governance: a White Paper (CdR 103/2001 fin);

Having regard to the proposal for a Council Regulation on the European Structural Fund (COM(98) 131 final);

Having regard to its opinion on the Proposal for a Council Regulation on the European Structural Fund (CdR 155/98) (1);

Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions on New Forms of Governance: Europe, a framework for citizens' initiative (CdR 182/2000 fin);

Having regard to the Commission Communication: Dialogue with associations of regional and local authorities on the formulation of European Union policy (COM(2003) 811 final);

Having regard to its draft opinion (CdR 240/2004 rev. 2) adopted on 8 December 2004 by its Commission for Economic and Social Policy (rapporteur: Mrs Paz Fernandez Felgueroso, Leader of Gijón Municipal Council (ES — PES)),

adopted the following opinion unanimously at its 58th plenary session, held on 23 and 24 February 2005 (meeting of 23 February).

1.   General comments

THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

2.   Recommendations

THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Brussels, 23 February 2005.

The President

of the Committee of the Regions

Peter STRAUB

----

(1)OJ C 51 of 22.02.1999, p. 48

----