alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.15





CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON








Golden Star Resources Ltd.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Golden Star Resources Ltd.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





I hereby consent to (i) being named and identified as a “qualified person” in connection with the following documents, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Form 40-F”) of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) to which this consent relates: (A) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016, (B) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2016, (C) the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on a Feasibility Study of the Wassa Open Pit Mine and Underground Project in Ghana" effective date December 31, 2014 and filed on May 8, 2015, (D) the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources and Reserves Golden Star Resources Ltd., Bogoso Prestea Gold Mine, Ghana" effective date December 31, 2013 and filed on March 14, 2014, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from such documents in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-211926, 333-175542, 333-169047, 333-118958, 333-105821 and 333-105820), as amended, and Registration Statement No. 333-196906 on Form F-10, as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.











/s/ Chris Bray_________________________


Chris Bray





March 30, 2017
###### Editorial Note on Part 11

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

#### § 11.89 How much time do I have to submit comments to FAA on a petition for exemption?

The FAA states the specific time allowed for comments in the Federal Register notice about the petition. We usually allow 20 days to comment on a petition for exemption.
Exhibit 23.2
                               AUDITORS' CONSENT

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-81614, 333-105820, 333-105821, 333-118958),
the  Registration  Statements  on Form S-3,  as amended  (File  Nos.  333-33237,
333-89767, 333-82106, 333-102225,  333-118956,  333-126741) and the Registration
Statement on Form S-4, as amended (File No. 333-118957) of Golden Star Resources
Ltd. of our report dated March 27, 2006 relating to the  consolidated  financial
statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
March 27, 2006
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Post
Properties, Inc. (Post) and Post Apartment Homes, L.P. (PAH, and together with Post, the Registrants) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Post and Post GP Holdings, Inc., PAHs general partner, certifies that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrants.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Christopher J. Papa                                                                   
|Christopher J. Papa Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer February 26, 2010
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHARON BENCIC,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of

Social Security,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 13-15295

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-00627-NVW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Neil V. Wake, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 16, 2015

San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,** Judge. 

Appellant Sharon Bencic appeals the denial of her claim for disability insurance

benefits and supplemental security income. The ALJ concluded that Bencic suffered from

two severe impairments, but could perform “light work,” including her previous work as a

FILED

MAY 04 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the U.S. Court of International

Trade, sitting by designation.
waitress. On appeal, Bencic argues that the ALJ erred in weighing her physicians’

medical opinions.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The ALJ did not err

in giving more weight to the opinions of non-examining and non-treating physicians over

the opinion of treating physician Dr. Hurley. The ALJ gave “specific and legitimate”

reasons for giving less weight to Dr. Hurley’s opinion, including that it was inconsistent

with the opinion of three spine specialists, and with Dr. Hurley’s own conservative course

of treatment. See Lester v. Chater, 81 F.3d 821, 830–31 (9th Cir. 1995). These reasons

were supported by substantial evidence in the record. See id. Despite Bencic’s arguments

to the contrary, the ALJ could rely on the opinions of examining and non-examining

physicians to discount Dr. Hurley’s opinion to the extent these opinions were supported by

and consistent with the objective medical evidence. See Thomas v. Barnhart, 278 F.3d

947, 957 (9th Cir. 2002). 

Because substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s determination that Bencic was not

disabled at step four, we do not reach Bencic’s argument that the ALJ erred at step five. 

See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(a)(4) (“If we can find that you are disabled or not disabled at a

step, we make our determination or decision and we do not go on to the next step.”). 

AFFIRMED.

2
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 690/2005

of 29 April 2005         

fixing the maximum export refund on wholly milled and parboiled long grain B rice to certain third countries in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2032/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1), and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The maximum export refund on wholly milled and parboiled long grain B rice to be exported to certain third countries pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2032/2004 is hereby fixed on the basis of the tenders submitted from 25 to 28 April 2005 at 57,00 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 30 April 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96.

(2)OJ L 353, 27.11.2004, p. 6.

(3)OJ L 61, 7.3.1975, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1948/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 18).

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21732-21733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10103]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-30-006]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Motion To Place Rate Schedule 
FTS-3 Into Effect April 1, 2000

April 18, 2000.
    Take notice that, on April 12, 2000, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, a motion to place rate schedule FTS-3 into effect and the 
following revised tariff sheets as listed in Appendix A to the filing, 
to be effective April 1, 2000.
    ANR states that this filing is made in compliance with the 
Commission's Order dated March 30, 2000 in the captioned proceeding.
    ANR states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
affected customers and state regulatory commissions.

[[Page 21733]]

    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before April 25, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10103 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 5

SECOND LETTER

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-5 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 5 - Second Letter Page 1 of 3
Case 17-03283-LTS9 Claim 1539-2 Part 2 Filed 06/25/18 Desc Exhibit A - Ledger

 and other docs. Page 2 of 4

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-5 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 5 - Second Letter Page 2 of 3
CERTIFIED TRANSLATION

I, Juan E. Segarra, USCCI #06-067/translator, certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate 

translation, to the best of my abilities, of the document in Spanish which I have seen.

Case 17-03283-LTS9 Claim 1539-2 Part 2 Filed 06/25/18 Desc Exhibit A - Ledger

and other docs. Page 2 of 4

[coat of arms: 

GOVERNMENT OF 

PUERTO RICO]

GOVERNMENT OF PUERTO RICO

Public Service Commission

June 13, 2017

Mr. Antonio Betancourt Capó, Esq.

La Electrónica Building

[signature]

Esteban E. Lomba Rodríguez M.B.A 

General Services Office Director

Public Service Commission

DELIVERY OF LA ELECTRONICA BUILDING KEYS

Greetings. The purpose of this letter is to carry out the delivery of La Electrónica Building keys.

[signature] June 13, 2017

Person who received them Date

Luz S. Ortiz

[LOGO]

1 0 0 

YEARS

SERVING PUERTO RICO

Road 1 Bori Street #1608 [Electrónica Bldg.] San Juan, P.R. 00919-0870 * P.O. Box 190870 San Juan, P.R. 00919-0870

P: 787 756 1919 F: office fax E: email personal@csp pr gov W: www csp pr gov

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-5 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 5 - Second Letter Page 3 of 3
§ 111.20 Database access. ( a ) *Delegation.* The responsible person may delegate PRD access to authorized users or proxies for purposes of compliance by the operator, entity, or trustee with the requirements of subpart B or C of this part.
( b ) *Terms for access.* No person may use the PRD for any purpose other than to inform a hiring decision concerning a pilot or to report information on behalf of the operator, entity, or trustee.
( c ) *Continuing access for authorized users and proxies.* PRD access by authorized users and proxies is contingent on the continued validity of the responsible person's electronic access. If a responsible person's electronic access is cancelled, the database access of authorized users and proxies will be cancelled unless the operator, entity, or trustee submits an amended application for database access and receives FAA approval of that application in accordance with § 111.15.
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.24 Scope of document discovery. ( a ) *Limits on discovery.* ( 1 ) Subject to the limitations set out in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, a party to a proceeding under this subpart may obtain document discovery by serving a written request to produce documents. For purposes of a request to produce documents, the term *documents* includes writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, recordings, electronically stored information, and other data or data compilations stored in any medium from which information can be obtained either directly or, if necessary, after translation by the responding party, into a reasonably usable form.
( 2 ) Discovery by use of deposition is governed by § 747.100.
( 3 ) Discovery by use of either interrogatories or requests for admission is not permitted.
( 4 ) Any request to produce documents that calls for irrelevant material; or that is unreasonable, oppressive, excessive in scope, unduly burdensome, or repetitive of previous requests, or that seeks to obtain privileged documents will be denied or modified. A request is unreasonable, oppressive, excessive in scope, or unduly burdensome if, among other things, it fails to include justifiable limitations on the time period covered and the geographic locations to be searched, or the time provided to respond in the request is inadequate.
( b ) *Relevance.* A party may obtain document discovery regarding any non-privileged matter that has material relevance to the merits of the pending action.
( c ) *Privileged matter.* Privileged documents are not discoverable. Privileges include the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, bank examination privilege, law enforcement privilege, any government's or government agency's deliberative process privilege, and any other privileges the Constitution, any applicable act of Congress, or the principles of common law provide.
( d ) *Time limits.* All document discovery, including all responses to discovery requests, must be completed by the date set by the ALJ and no later than 30 days prior to the date scheduled for the commencement of the hearing, except as provided in the Local Rules. No exceptions to this time limit are permitted, unless the ALJ finds on the record that good cause exists for waiving the requirements of this paragraph (d).
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10113]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act as amended (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2). The Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ) announces meetings of scientific peer 
review groups. The subcommittees listed below are part of the Agency's 
Health Services Initial Review Group Committee.
    The subcommittee meetings will be closed to the public in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 
U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C., 552b(c)(6). Grant applications are to 
be reviewed and discussed at these meetings. These discussions are 
likely to reveal personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications. This information is exempt from mandatory 
disclosure under the above-cited statutes.

    1. Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Technology and Decision 
Sciences.
    Date: June 1-2, 2000 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. and closed 
for remainder of the meeting).
    Place: AHRQ, Executive Office Center, 6010 Executive Boulevard, 
4th Floor Conference Center, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    2. Name of Subcommittee: Health Systems Research.
    Date: June 8-9, 2000 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. and closed 
for remainder of the meeting).
    Place: AHRQ, Executive Office Center, 6010 Executive Boulevard, 
4th Floor Conference Center, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    3. Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Quality and Effectiveness 
Research.
    Date: June 22-23, 2000 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8 15 a.m. and closed 
for remainder of the meeting).
    Place: Willshire Grand Hotel & Centre, Willshire Boulevard, Los 
Angeles, California 90017.
    4. Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Research Training.
    Date: July 20-21, 2000 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. and closed 
for remainder of the meeting).
    Place: AHRQ, Executive Office Center, 6010 Executive Boulevard, 
4th Floor Conference Center, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members or 
minutes of the meetings should contact Ms. Jenny Griffith, Committee 
Management Officer, Office of Research Review, Education and Policy, 
AHRQ, 2101 East Jefferson Street, Suite 400, Rockville, Maryland 
20852, Telephone (301) 594-1847.
    Agenda items for these meetings are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.

    Dated: April 14, 2000.
John M. Eisenberg,
Director.
[FR Doc. 00-10113 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
#### GRIMES v. COMMISSIONERS OF HARRISON COUNTY.

Mandamus, not granted, without a rule to show cause — but on an application for a writ of mandamus, a rule may issue.

Application for a mandamus. The applicant, Grimes,is the owner of a tract of land over which a road has been laid out. He applied for damages, which were duly assessed, but the county commissioners determined that the assessment of the viewers was excessive, and refused to give an order on the treasurer for the money.

*Scott,*

moved for a mandamus.

*127Br the Court.

It is not our practice to issue a mandamus ifi the' first instance. Upon the case made on the papers, you may take a-rule upon the commissioners to show cause why a mandamus should not issue. Rule taken to show cause next term.
#### § 790.3 Requests for action.

Except as otherwise provided by NCUA regulation, all applications, requests, and submittals for action by the NCUA shall be in writing and addressed to the appropriate office described in § 790.2. This will usually be one of the Regional Offices. In instances where the appropriate office cannot be determined, requests should be sent to the Office of External Affairs and Communications.

[58 FR 45431, Aug. 30, 1993, as amended at 84 FR 38850, Aug. 8, 2019]
```

[House Report 106-1030]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                    106-1030

======================================================================

 
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.J. RES. 133, MAKING FURTHER CONTINUING 
                  APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001

                                _______
                                

  December 15 (legislative day, December 14), 2000.--Referred to the 
                House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 674]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 674, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                  summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides for consideration in the House of 
H.J. Res. 133, making further continuing appropriations for 
fiscal year 2001, under a closed rule. The rule waives all 
points of order against consideration of the joint resolution. 
The rule also provides one hour of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Appropriations. Finally, the rule provides one 
motion to recommit.

                                  

```
# Publicatieblad C 464A/17 n

| | ISSN 1977-0995 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 464A |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 64e jaargang17 november 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0995

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 464A

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

64e jaargang17 november 2021

---

| Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- |
| | Rectificaties |
| 2021/C 464 A/01 | Rectificatie van het directoraat-generaal Onderzoek en Innovatie — Bekendmaking van een vacature voor de functie van hoofdadviseur — Voorzitter van het college van de Europese Innovatieraad (Tijdelijke functionaris — graad AD 14) — COM/2021/10408 ( PB C 432 A van 26.10.2021 ) | 1 |

Inhoud

Bladzijde

Rectificaties

2021/C 464 A/01

Rectificatie van het directoraat-generaal Onderzoek en Innovatie — Bekendmaking van een vacature voor de functie van hoofdadviseur — Voorzitter van het college van de Europese Innovatieraad (Tijdelijke functionaris — graad AD 14) — COM/2021/10408 ( PB C 432 A van 26.10.2021 )

( PB C 432 A van 26.10.2021 )

1

---

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

Rectificaties

| 17.11.2021 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | CA 464/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2021

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

CA 464/1

---

Rectificatie van het directoraat-generaal Onderzoek en Innovatie — Bekendmaking van een vacature voor de functie van hoofdadviseur — Voorzitter van het college van de Europese Innovatieraad

(Tijdelijke functionaris — graad AD 14)

COM/2021/10408

(
  Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie C 432 A van 26 oktober 2021
  )

(2021/C 464 A/01)

Bladzijde 5, onder “Uiterste datum voor inschrijving”, eerste alinea:

| in plaats van: | “De inschrijving wordt afgesloten op 26 november 2021 om 12.00 uur ’s middags Brusselse tijd. Na dit tijdstip is inschrijven niet meer mogelijk.”, |
| --- | --- |

in plaats van:

“De inschrijving wordt afgesloten op 26 november 2021 om 12.00 uur ’s middags Brusselse tijd. Na dit tijdstip is inschrijven niet meer mogelijk.”,

| lezen: | “De inschrijving wordt afgesloten op 17 december 2021 om 12.00 uur ’s middags Brusselse tijd. Na dit tijdstip is inschrijven niet meer mogelijk.”. |
| --- | --- |

lezen:

lezen:

“De inschrijving wordt afgesloten op 17 december 2021 om 12.00 uur ’s middags Brusselse tijd. Na dit tijdstip is inschrijven niet meer mogelijk.”.

---