alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Cause No. DA 21-0535

__________________________________________________________________

FLATHEAD LAKERS INC., a Montana non-profit public benefit corporation, 

AMY J. WALLER, STEVEN F. MOORE, CYNTHIA S. EDSTROM,

ADELE ZIMMERMAN, MARTIN FULSAAS and GAIL A. WATSONFULSAAS, LAUREL FULLERTON, ALAN and DEIRDRE COIT, and FRANK 

M. WOODS,

Petitioners/Appellees,

WATER FOR FLATHEAD’S FUTURE,

Intervenor/Appellee,

v.

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND 

CONSERVATION,

Respondent/Appellant,

and MONTANA ARTESIAN WATER COMPANY,

Respondent/Appellant

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the Montana First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark 

County,

Honorable Kathy Seeley Presiding

Cause No. CDV-2018-135

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

__________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Montana Artesian Water Company’s motion for an 

extension of time, made pursuant to M.R.App.P., Rule 26, and good cause 

appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted a 30-day extension 

from the current deadline of April 21, 2022, within which to file its opening brief. 

Appellant’s brief is now due on or before May 13, 2022.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 16 2022

04/18/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0535
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3504

To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 

redesignate the American Indian Education Foundation as the National 

Fund for Excellence in American Indian Education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2003

Mr. RENZI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to redesignate the American Indian Education Foundation as the National Fund for Excellence 

in American Indian Education.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN EDU4 CATION FOUNDATION. 

5 (a) REDESIGNATION.—Section 501(a) of title V of 

6 the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance 

7 Act (25 U.S.C. 458bbb(a)), as added by Public Law 106–
2

•HR 3504 IH 

1 568, is amended by striking ‘‘the American Indian Edu2 cation Foundation’’ and inserting ‘‘a foundation to be 

3 known as the ‘National Fund for Excellence in American 

4 Indian Education’ (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Founda5 tion’)’’. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Title V of the In7 dian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act 

8 (25 U.S.C. 458bbb), as added by Public Law 106–568, 

9 is amended—

10 (1) in the heading to read as follows: 

11 ‘‘TITLE V—NATIONAL FUND FOR 

12 EXCELLENCE IN AMERICAN 

13 INDIAN EDUCATION’’; 

14 and 

15 (2) in the heading of section 501 to read as fol16 lows: 

17 ‘‘SEC. 501. NATIONAL FUND FOR EXCELLENCE IN AMER18 ICAN INDIAN EDUCATION.’’.

Æ
----

Action brought on 23 March 2005 by Commission of the European Communities against Impetus Consultants

(Case T-138/05)

(2005/C 182/69)

Language of the case: Greek

An action against the company, Impetus Consultants, was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 23 March 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by D. Triandafilou, assisted by N. Kostikas, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The European Community, represented by the European Commission, entered into three contracts with the defendant in the context of Community framework programmes for research and development. Those contracts were more specifically:

In all those cases it was provided that the Commission would make a financial contribution to the relevant project under the terms laid down in each agreement. In respect of each agreement the Commission paid to the defendant advances on its financial contribution.

Following financial checks, the Commission found that the defendant was using only a part of the monies paid over to it for the purposes of the relevant project. Specifically:

By its action the Commission seeks repayment of the abovementioned amounts owed, together with interest thereon, in accordance with the law applicable to each contract, that is to say, in the case of the first contract, Greek law and, in the case of the other two contracts, Spanish law.

----
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00319-CV

IN THE MATTER OF D.M., A CHILD

On Appeal from the

449th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. J-0153-16-K

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The Court orders the 

judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant, although he/she is exempt from payment due to his/her inability to pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 18, 2018
#### N. Goldring, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Aaron Johnson, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion Filed April 29, 1913.

1. The principle that no court shall aid men who found their cause of action upon illegal acts, is not only a well settled, hut a most salutary principle.

2. One may not recover for liquors sold under a contract requiring the buyer to resell the liquors under the former’s license; the license being personal and transferable only by the permission of duly constituted authorities.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Judgment affirmed.

*Avery*& *Price,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*E. G. Maxwell,*for' Defendant in Error.

Cockrell, J.

In an action for goods sold, there was judgment for the defendant.

It appears from the record that Goldring, a wholesale liquor dealer, was desirous to have Johnson conduct a retail liquor business in a store owned by Goldring in the *382city of Pensacola. He entered into a contract with John-' son whereby it was agreed that the said Johnson should ' lease the said building at a stipulated rental, buy all his liquors at a satisfactory price from Goldring, and conduct and own the business; but that the licenses, State arid Municipal, to conduct such business should be taken out in the name of Goldring, to be paid for by Johnson. This scheme is a clear violation of the statute, in that a license to- sell intoxicating liquors is personal, and can be transferred only by permission of duly constituted authorities, and neither custom nor ignorance of the law can validate the transaction.

In support of the plaintiff’s claim to recover, reliance is placed upon the doctrine of this court in Crescent Ins. Co. of New Orleans v. Bear, 23 Fla. 50, 1 South. Rep. 318, wherein cases are cited to support recovery by one party to a share* of the profits arising out of an illegal venture already consummated; one of the parties to the venture was not before the court, and it was readily conceded that none of his rights could be adjudicated. The cases cited from the Supreme Court of the United States have in effect been overruled by that court, so the doctrine is without weight.

More to the'point is the language of this court in Cook v. Fernandez, 11 Fla. 100: “The principle that no court shall aid men who found their cause of action upon illegal acts, is not only a well settled, but a most salutary principle.”

The gist of the contract, the basic foundation of the action, is that Johnson should commit the illegal act of selling intoxicating liquors in his own right under the license issued to Goldring. The courts can best preserve the law by refusing their aid to wilful violations of the *383law. The case of Koppiz-Melchers Brewing Co. v. Behm, 130 Mich. 649, 90 N. W. Rep. 676, is very close in point.

The judgment is affirmed.

Shackleford, C. J., and Taylor, Hocker and Whitfield, J. J., concur.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BULLETIN 1031
PLATE 6

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

EXPLANATION

UNCONSOLIDATED DEPOSITS

i

Topsoil, some sand, grovel, and talus,
These areas generally overgrown by
‘@ heavy stand of grass or alders

‘QUATERNARY

Gravel, some sond

eaocey cane BRE
Dausive ge

falus
Qt, folus; Qtg,, folus intermixed with grovel

suis EERE an
Approximate maximum
3 = Melever sooty:
Tit = (9)
Dork gray J Oe
sono
cea a EE oy Eee
er ey onion
fanaa hme
say eo em

Contour interval 50 feet on land
‘and 10 feet on water surface
Interbedded slate ond orgillite il 10 Seat Sewn schon

Dork-gray rock, extremely cherty in moon

‘places, some thin graywacke beds

DIVERSION AREA ON MAIN TRIBUTARY OF BRADLEY RIVER
NORTH OF BRADLEY LAKE

Ko
Groywacke with occasional
‘argillaceous beds

Massive strong very fine to medium-grained
‘dork-greenish-gray to dork-gray rock thot
weathers light brown to moderate reddish
brown. There are a few beds or lenses of
‘argilite or slate thot may be cherty or con-
tain squeezed, sousage-shoped pieces of
graywacke, Right abutment of domsite is
‘massive graywacke

[a]

Interbedded groywacke. ond slote
‘Metomorphosed. In places the graywacke is cut
‘by many small quartz veins. The slate may
contain many embedded graywacke particles

CRETACEOUS.

Quortz diorite dike

Fault, showing dip

Dashed where approximately located dotted
where concealed; question mark where prob-
able. vu, upthrown side j , downthrown side.
Holf-barbed arrows indicate relative move-
‘ment. Short crossbar indicates vertical
fault. 4p, bearing and plunge of slicken-
sides

7
Strike and dip of beds

APPRONIMATE MEAN c
‘DECLINATION, 1961 2000"

Bradley Loke
2

ae
Strike of vertical beds

0
Strike ond dip of overturned beds
00"

y THE ALTE if
seid! PEG
True dp of bedsing ranges trom 67° to 888

—- ee

c_
Line of section
Long dosh where along
proposed tunnel route

Bradley River
eno mW SECTION

Proposed tunnel route ee

~ i
> oo! 1] i;

Proposed pipeline »
HIN

SS pe = IN ers f

i
Average true dip of feeding in lett abutment i 78°W |

2
Proposed powerhouse site

Contour interval os indicated
‘Datum is mean sea level

‘
River mileage r 20 490 00 Feat

Win respeet le moubyof ‘Contour interval 50 feet on land
Brodley River ‘and | foot on water surface.
es Dotted contours ‘ore under water
ona fable Ganchienark Datum is meon seo level RECONNAISSANCE GEOLOGIC MAP OF DIVERSION AREA
reas ‘AT BRADLEY-NUKA DIVIDE,
Spot elevation BRADLEY LAKE DAMSITE BRADLEY LAKE TUNNEL ROUTES

Topography from Bradley River, Alaska, river survey INTERIOR—GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON, Dc 61220 Pane nanan T=

Rloske, topographic quedrangies’ 953° GEOLOGIC MAP OF DAMSITES AND DIVERSION AREAS WITH SECTIONS OF DAMSITES AND TUNNEL ROUTES

Alaska, topographic quadrangles, 1953,

ae OOF US Cesiogicat Sane BRADLEY RIVER, KENAI PENINSULA, ALASKA
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Pittencrieff Communications, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
of Pittencrieff Communications, Inc. on (i) Form S-8 (No. 33-81736 and
No. 33-81738), (ii) Form S-4 (No. 33-83810), and (iii) Form S-3 (No. 333-3356)
of our report dated March 4, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Pittencrieff Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996
and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report
on Form 10-K of Pittencrieff Communications, Inc.



                                            KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 27, 1997
FILED IN14th COURT OF APPEALS      HOUSTON, TEXAS  3/9/2015 3:07:54 PMCHRISTOPHER A. PRINE                Clerk
CONSENT



March 2006



Golden Star Resources Ltd.





I, Colin Jones,  do hereby  consent to the  inclusion of resource  estimates and
preliminary  pit   optimisation   results  for  the  Paul  Isnard  Project,   as
independently  prepared by RSG Global in 2003,  in this Form 10-K of Golden Star
Resources  Ltd.  and to the use of "RSG Global" in the form and context in which
it appears.  I also hereby consent to the  incorporation  by reference in Golden
Star Resources Ltd.'s  Registration  Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-81614,
333-105820,  333-10521,  333-118958), the Registration Statement on Form S-3, as
amended (File Nos.  333-33237,  333-89767,  333-82106,  333-102225,  333-118956,
333-126741)  and the  Registration  Statement on Form S-4, as amended  (File No.
333-118957) of such resource estimates and preliminary pit optimisation results.

RSG Global  understands  that no additional  work has been completed at the Paul
Isnard Project since 2003, and that the resources as independently  estimated by
RSG Global remain valid.



Dated this  28th day of March 2006.


/s/ Colin Jones
------------------------------------



For and on behalf of
C.M. Jones, Former Partner
RSG Global Pty Ltd




                RSG Global Pty Ltd (ACN 101 090 135) as trustee
                 for RSG Global Partnership (ABN 79 256 402 893)

                       PERTH o JOHANNESBURG o ACCRA o LIMA
Exhibit 23





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-85530, dated October 21, 1994, Registration No. 333-3464, dated April
18, 1996, Registration No. 33-63085, dated September 9, 1998, Registration
No. 333-82185, dated July 2, 1999, and Registration No. 333-118506, dated
August 24, 2004 on Form S-8 and the Registration
Statement No. 33-62012, dated April 11, 1996, Registration
No. 333-91649, dated November 24, 1999 and Registration No. 333-51400,
dated December 7, 2000 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 9, 2009, relating
to our audit of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Innodata Isogen Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and
for the year then ended and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of Innodata Isogen, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008,
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Innodata Isogen Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2008.





/s/ J.H.
COHN LLP





Roseland,
New Jersey


March 9,
2009
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 1, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00326

- CR

Kevin Deshon FOSTER

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR6383 Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

A ppellant ’s brief is due on October 31, 2018. Before the due date

, Appellant filed a first

motion for a ninety

- day extension of time to file the brief.

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART

. Appellant’s brief is due on December 31,

2018.

We caution Appellant that any further request for an extension of time to file the brief will be strongly disfavored.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on t his 1st day of November, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>



FRONTIER INSURANCE GROUP, INC.  JUNE 30, FORM 10-Q                    EXHIBIT 11

                        Computation of Per Share Earnings
                 (in thousands, except per share dollar amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three Months                         Six  Months
                                                          Ended June 30,                     Ended June 30,
                                                       1998            1997                1998           1997
                                                    ---------       ---------            --------      -------
<S>                                                   <C>             <C>                 <C>            <C>    
Basic earnings per share:
Net income                                            $17,465         $15,419             $35,208        $27,323
                                                      =======         =======             =======        =======
Weighted average shares of
   common stock outstanding (1)                        37,395          32,301              37,369         32,288
                                                      =======         =======             =======        =======

Net income per share of
   common stock outstanding (1)                       $  0.47         $  0.48             $  0.94        $  0.85
                                                      =======         =======             =======        =======

Diluted earnings per share:
Net income                                             19,270          17,242              38,759         30,889
                                                      =======         =======             =======        =======
Weighted average shares of
   common stock and common stock
   equivalents outstanding (1)
                                                       45,883          40,396              45,858         40,383
                                                      =======         =======             =======        =======
Net income per share of
   common stock and common stock
   equivalents outstanding (1)                        $  0.42         $  0.43             $  0.85        $  0.77
                                                      =======         =======             =======        =======
</TABLE>


(1)    Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding have been adjusted to
       give effect to the Company's common stock dividends and stock splits.
       Accordingly, net income per share of common stock has been adjusted.




<PAGE>
Slip Op. 06-44

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---x

 :

GUANGZHOU MARIA YEE FURNISHINGS, :

LTD., et al. : Before: Pogue, Judge 

Plaintiffs, :

 :

 : Court No. 05-00065

 v. :

 : 

UNITED STATES, :

 :

Defendant, :

 :

AMERICAN FURNITURE :

MANUFACTURERS COMMITTEE FOR : 

FAIR TRADE, et al. :

 :

 Defendant-Intervenors. :

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---x

JUDGMENT

In Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of

China, 69 Fed. Reg. 67,313 (Dep’t Commerce Nov. 17, 2004) 

(notice of final determination of sales at less than fair market

value and antidumping duty order) and its corresponding “Issues &

Decision Memorandum” dated November 4, 2004, the Department of

Commerce (“Commerce”) rejected as untimely certain submissions

from Guangzhou Maria Yee Furnishings, Ltd., Pyla HK Ltd., and

Maria Yee Inc. (collectively “Maria Yee”) and, therefore,

assessed Maria Yee the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”)-wide

cash deposit rate of 198.08%. Maria Yee timely appealed that

determination averring that it was improperly denied the separate

rate of 6.65%. On December 14, 2005, this court found unlawful

Commerce’s assessment of the PRC-wide cash deposit rate, based

upon Commerce’s unreasonable reliance on notice to be provided

through the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”), and remanded

the issue to Commerce for reconsideration. Guangzhou Maria Yee

Furnishings, Ltd. v. United States, 29 CIT __, Slip Op. 2005-158

(2005). 

Pursuant to that remand order, Commerce issued a remand

determination on March 1, 2006, in which it considered Maria

Yee’s evidence. Commerce determined that Maria Yee did qualify

for separate-rate treatment, in accordance with the court’s

decision, and specifically was qualified for the 6.65% separate
rate.

This court, having received and reviewed Commerce’s Remand

Results, comments and rebuttals thereto, finds that Commerce duly

complied with the court’s remand order. Therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Department of Commerce’s remand determination

is supported by substantial evidence, and otherwise in accordance

with law; and it is further

ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on March 1,

2006 are affirmed in their entirety.

 /s/ 

Donald C. Pogue, Judge

Dated: April 5, 2006

New York, New York
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 375 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 375

To declare, under the authority of Congress under Article I, section 8 
  of the Constitution to ``provide and maintain a Navy'', a national 
policy for the naval force structure required in order to ``provide for 
 the common defense'' of the United States throughout the 21st century.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2003

Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia (for herself, Mr. Taylor of Mississippi, 
 Mr. Forbes, Mr. McIntyre, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, 
 Mr. Andrews, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Simmons, Mr. 
   Larsen of Washington, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, Mr. Miller of 
  Florida, Mr. Platts, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. 
 Hastings of Florida, Mr. Goode, Mr. Hostettler, Mr. Langevin, and Mr. 
  McGovern) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To declare, under the authority of Congress under Article I, section 8 
  of the Constitution to ``provide and maintain a Navy'', a national 
policy for the naval force structure required in order to ``provide for 
 the common defense'' of the United States throughout the 21st century.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``National Naval Force Structure 
Policy Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL NAVAL FORCE STRUCTURE POLICY.

     It is the policy of the United States to rebuild as soon as 
possible the size of the fleet of the United States Navy to no fewer 
than 375 vessels in active service, to include 15 aircraft carrier 
battle groups and 15 amphibious ready groups, in order to ensure peace 
through strength for the United States throughout the 21st century.
                                 <all>
```