alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32**

**Certification      Pursuant to**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350**

| (1)   | The                report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                        |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)   | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                registrant.  |

| July                24, 2006                                           |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                   |   |
|                                                                   |   |
| /s/                Jeffrey R. Immelt                                   |   |
| Jeffrey                R. ImmeltChief                Executive Officer |   |
|                                                         |   |
| /s/                Keith S. Sherin                                     |   |
| Keith                S. SherinChief                Financial Officer   |   |
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 

20, 2024. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00522-CV

ALCHEMY TENACITY, LLC, RICHARD PAUL BEAULLIEU, ALCHEMY 

2018, LLC AND ALCHEMY 4, LLC, Appellants

V.

MTZ HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2023-75394

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 27, 2024. On July 26, 2024, 

appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The 

motion is granted. 

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-40875

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN MARTINEZ-GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:19-CR-967-1

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan MartinezGarcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Garcia has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 30, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-40875 Document: 00515471472 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2020
No. 19-40875

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-40875 Document: 00515471472 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/30/2020
§ 120.21 Testing for alcohol. ( a ) Each air traffic control facility not operated by the FAA or the U.S. military must establish an alcohol testing program in accordance with the provisions of subpart F of this part.
( b ) No employer shall use any individual who meets the definition of covered employee in subpart A of this part to perform a safety-sensitive function listed in subpart F of this part unless that individual is subject to testing for alcohol misuse in accordance with the provisions of that subpart.
§ 48.12 Authorization to trade. ( a ) *Specific authorization required.* No national bank may directly or indirectly effect a retail forex transaction for the account of any retail forex customer unless, before the retail forex transaction occurs, the retail forex customer specifically authorized the national bank to effect the retail forex transaction.
( b ) *Requirements for specific authorization.* A retail forex transaction is “specifically authorized” for purposes of this section if the retail forex customer specifies: ( 1 ) The precise retail forex transaction to be effected;
( 2 ) The exact amount of the foreign currency to be purchased or sold; and
( 3 ) In the case of an option, the identity of the foreign currency or contract that underlies the option.
Exhibit 31.2Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification I, Stephen Couture, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1, of PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, INC.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedurespresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 

 
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: October 2, 2006/s/ Stephen Couture Stephen Couture,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Transmittal of Record to the Court of Appeals 

DATE: March 6, 2023 

BK Case: 17-3283 LTS (Jointly Administered) (PROMESA) 

APPEAL FEE PAID ($505): YES X _ NO PENDING 

CASE CAPTION: In re: The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

IN FORMA PAUPERIS: YES NO X 

MOTIONS PENDING: YES NO X _

NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY: Estate of Pedro José Nazario Serrano

APPEAL FROM: Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting the Motion to 

Enforce the Plan entered on 11/29/2022 and Order Denying Motion for 

Reconsideration Under Bankruptcy Rule 9023 entered on 1/26/2023.

SPECIAL COMMENTS: Copies of original documents. 

INDEX OF DOCUMENTS INCLUDED AS THE RECORD ON APPEAL: 

Docket Entries: 22927, 23399, 23624

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed documents contained herein are copies or the original 

pleadings as described above and constitute the record on appeal in the case. 

Agnes Ferrer-Auffant, Esq. 

Acting Clerk of Court 

S/Idnar Diaz

Idnar Diaz

Deputy Clerk 

Acknowledgment of Receipt: 

Received By: ________________ 

USCCA #: ________________ s/c: CM/ECF Parties, Appeals Clerk

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23697 Filed:03/06/23 Entered:03/06/23 18:45:36 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JONATAN CARDENAS-NAVA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-70348

Agency No. A095-447-113

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 13, 2014** 

Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Jonatan Cardenas-Nava, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo questions of law. Ordonez v.

FILED

MAY 27 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
INS, 345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Cardenas-Nava’s motion to

reopen on the ground that the evidence he submitted was insufficient to establish

prima facie eligibility for cancellation of removal where he did not articulate any

hardship to his new qualifying relative. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D) (applicant

must establish that removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual

hardship to a qualifying relative); see also Partap v. Holder, 603 F.3d 1173, 1175

(9th Cir. 2010) (per curiam) (no abuse of discretion in denying motion to remand

to apply for cancellation after the birth of a U.S. citizen child where petitioner “did

not tender any evidence showing exceptional and extremely unusual hardship”)

(internal quotation marks omitted).

Cardenas-Nava’s contention that he is not required to submit evidence of

hardship to demonstrate prima facie eligibility for relief in a motion to reopen

before the BIA lacks merit. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Ordonez, 345 F.3d at

785 (a motion to reopen will not be granted unless the applicant establishes a case

of prima facie eligibility for the underlying relief sought.)

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 12-70348
Section 1350 Certifications
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: January 14, 2011
    /s/ Christopher J. DavinoChristopher J. DavinoPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)Dated:  January 14, 2011
    /s/ John A. StoneJohn A. Stone,Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.703 Authority to conduct investigations. ( a ) The General Counsel and persons acting on his or her behalf and at his or her direction may conduct such investigations into the affairs of any insured credit union or institution-affiliated parties as deemed appropriate to determine whether such credit union or party has violated, is violating or is about to violate any provision of the Act, the NCUA Board's regulations or other relevant statutes or regulations that may bear on a party's fitness to participate in the affairs of a credit union. The General Counsel and persons acting on his or her behalf may investigate whether any party is unfit to participate in the affairs of a credit union, whether formal enforcement proceedings are warranted, or such other matters as the General Counsel or his or her designee, in his or her discretion, shall deem appropriate. Such investigations may be conducted either informally or formally.
( b ) Formal investigations involve the exercise of the NCUA Board's subpoena power and are referred to here as formal investigative proceedings. In formal investigative proceedings, the General Counsel and those to whom he or she delegates authority to act on his or her behalf and at his or her direction have augmented investigatory powers and need not rely on the powers available to them in informal investigations, and they may gather evidence through the issuance of subpoenas compelling the production of documents or testimony as well. In informal investigations evidence may be gathered ordinarily through the use of investigatory procedures or credit union examinations and through voluntary statements and submissions.
( c ) The NCUA Board has delegated authority to the General Counsel, or designee thereof, to institute formal investigative proceedings by the entry of an order indicating the purpose of the investigation and the designation of persons to conduct that investigation on his or her behalf and at his or her direction. This delegation also extends to the NCUA Board's role as liquidator and conservator of insured credit unions. The power to issue a subpoena may not be delegated outside the agency. The General Counsel may amend such order as he deems appropriate.
[56 FR 37767, Aug. 8, 1991; 57 FR 523, Jan. 7, 1992]
#### § 390.299 Nonwithdrawable account.

The term *nonwithdrawable account* means an account which by the terms of the contract of the accountholder with the State savings association or by provisions of state law cannot be paid to the accountholder until all liabilities, including other classes of share liability of the State savings association have been fully liquidated and paid upon the winding up of the State savings association is referred to as a *nonwithdrawable account.*
# C_2019209EN.01003301.xml

| 20.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/33

---

No state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

(2019/C 209/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 2 April 2019 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 82159 |
| Decision No | : | 020/19/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Leangbukten Båtforenings Andelslag |
| Form of aid | : | No aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Asker municipality |
| P.O Box 353 |
| 1372 Asker |
| Norway |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

2 April 2019

Case No

:

82159

Decision No

:

020/19/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Leangbukten Båtforenings Andelslag

Form of aid

:

No aid

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Asker municipality

P.O Box 353

1372 Asker

Norway

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
# Official Journal C 109/4 Ma

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 109 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 484 May 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 109

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 484 May 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Acts adopted pursuant to Title V of the Treaty on European Union |
| 2005/C 109/1 | Fourth Annual Report on the implementation of the EU Joint Action of 12 July 2002 on the European Union's contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons (2002/589/CFSP) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Acts adopted pursuant to Title V of the Treaty on European Union

2005/C 109/1

Fourth Annual Report on the implementation of the EU Joint Action of 12 July 2002 on the European Union's contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons (2002/589/CFSP)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors and Shareholders of Copart, Inc.

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-81238) pertaining to the Copart 1992 Stock Option Plan, 1994
Director Option Plan, and 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (Form S-8 No. 33-97636) pertaining to the Copart 1992 Stock Option Plan,
(Form S-8 No. 333-93887) pertaining to the Copart 1992 Stock Option Plan and the Copart 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
(Form S-8 No. 333-90612) pertaining to the Copart 2001 Stock Option Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-112597) pertaining to the
Copart 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-148506) pertaining to the Copart 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, and
(Form S-8 No. 333-159946) pertaining to the Copart, Inc. Stand Alone Stock Option Award Agreement dated April 14, 2009 between Copart, Inc.
and Willis J. Johnson and the Copart, Inc. Stand Alone Stock Option Award Agreement dated April 14, 2009 between Copart, Inc. and A. Jayson Adair of our reports dated
September 23, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Copart, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Copart, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended July 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

/s/
Ernst & Young LLP

Sacramento,
California
September 23, 2010

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center For Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel Biomedical Technology.
    Date: April 20, 2000.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 11 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 
6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Rebecca A. Fuldner, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research 
Resources, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7965, (301) 435-0809.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 
93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 17, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-10176 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 1206.601 Notice to submitters. ( a ) Except as provided in § 1206.603(b) and § 1206.603(c), the Agency shall provide a submitter with prompt written notice of a FOIA request that seeks its commercial information whenever required under § 1206.600(a).
( b ) A notice to a submitter must include: ( 1 ) The exact language of the request or an accurate description of the request;
( 2 ) Access to or a description of the responsive records or portions thereof containing the commercial information to the submitter;
( 3 ) A description of the procedures for objecting to the release of the possibly confidential information under § 1206.602;
( 4 ) A time limit for responding to the Agency that shall not exceed 10 working days from the date of the letter sent to the submitter by the FOIA Office or publication of the notice (as set forth in § 1206.603(b)) to object to the release and to explain the basis for the objection;
( 5 ) Notice that the information contained in the submitter's objections may itself be subject to disclosure under the FOIA;
( 6 ) Notice that the Agency, not the submitter, is responsible for deciding whether the information shall be released or withheld;
( 7 ) Notice that failing to respond within the timeframe specified under § 1206.601(b)(4) will create a presumption that the submitter has no objection to the disclosure of the information in question.
( c ) Whenever the Agency provides notice pursuant to this section, the Agency shall advise the requester that notice and opportunity to comment are being provided to the submitter.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3638

To adjust the boundary of Redwood National Park in the State of California, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2003

Mr. THOMPSON of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To adjust the boundary of Redwood National Park in the 

State of California, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Redwood National 

5 Park Boundary Adjustment Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REDWOOD NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY ADJUST7 MENT. 

8 Section 2(a) of the Act of October 2, 1968 (Public 

9 Law 90–545; 82 Stat. 931) is amended—
2

•HR 3638 IH 

1 (1) by striking the first sentence and inserting: 

2 ‘‘The area to be included within the Redwood Na3 tional Park is that generally depicted on the map en4 titled ‘Redwood National Park, Revised Boundary’, 

5 numbered 167/60502, and dated February, 2003. 

6 The map shall be kept on file and made available for 

7 public inspection in the appropriate offices of the 

8 National Park Service, and shall be provided to the 

9 appropriate officers of Del Norte and Humboldt 

10 Counties, California.’’; and 

11 (2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘one 

12 hundred and six thousand acres’’ and inserting 

13 ‘‘133,000 acres’’.

Æ