alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 745
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 745 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 745.202 Judicial review. ( a ) For purposes of seeking judicial review of actions taken pursuant to this subpart, only a determination on appeal issued by the Board pursuant to § 745.202 of this subpart shall constitute a final determination regarding an accountholder's claim for insurance.
( b ) Failure to file an appeal with regard to an initial determination, or a decision rendered on a request for reconsideration within the applicable time periods shall constitute a failure by the accountholder to exhaust available administrative remedies and, due to such failure, any objections to the initial determination or request for reconsideration shall be deemed to be waived and such determination shall be deemed to have been accepted by, and binding upon, the accountholder.
( c ) Final determination by the Board is reviewable in accordance with the provisions of chapter 7, title 5, United States Code, by the United States district court for the Federal judicial district where the credit union's principal place of business is located. Such action must be filed not later than 60 days after such final determination is ordered.
[51 FR 37560, Oct. 23, 1986, as amended at 71 FR 67440, Nov. 22, 2006. Redesignated at 82 FR 50294, Oct. 30, 2017; 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998
in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         378,358
<SECURITIES>                                16,561,909
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,549,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                   691,975
<INVENTORY>                                  3,188,086
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,482,865
<PP&E>                                       3,904,129
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,120,172
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,810,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,462,869
<BONDS>                                      1,050,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,450
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,281,065
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,810,384
<SALES>                                     19,981,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,981,746
<CGS>                                       12,289,661
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,896,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,505,554
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,211,134
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,294,420
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,294,420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34
        

</TABLE>
§ 708a.108 NCUA oversight of methods and procedures of membership vote. ( a ) The Regional Director will review the methods by which the membership vote was taken and the procedures applicable to the membership vote. The Regional Director will determine: if the notices and other communications to members were accurate, not misleading, and timely; the membership vote was conducted in a fair and legal manner; and the credit union has otherwise complied with part 708a.
( b ) After completion of this review, the Regional Director will issue a determination that the methods and procedures applicable to the membership vote are approved or disapproved. The Regional Director will issue this determination within 30 calendar days of receipt from the credit union of the certification of the result of the membership vote required under § 708a.107 unless the Regional Director extends the period as necessary to request additional information or review the credit union's submission. Approval of the methods and procedures under this paragraph remains subject to a credit union fulfilling the requirements in § 708a.110 for timely completion of the conversion.
( c ) If the Regional Director disapproves the methods by which the membership vote was taken or the procedures applicable to the membership vote, the Regional Director may direct that a new vote be taken.
( d ) A converting credit union may request the regional director to reconsider a determination regarding the methods and procedures of the membership vote and/or file an appeal with the NCUA Board in accordance with the procedures set forth in subpart B to part 746 of this chapter.
[71 FR 77167, Dec. 22, 2006. Redesignated at 75 FR 81386, Dec. 28, 2010, as amended at 82 FR 50293, Oct. 30, 2017; 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,141,153
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,453,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,770,930
<PP&E>                                     169,982,378
<DEPRECIATION>                              38,208,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             149,243,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,769,711
<BONDS>                                    100,723,844
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  8,825,440
<COMMON>                                       106,778
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,180,419
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               149,243,506
<SALES>                                     19,951,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,020,066
<CGS>                                        6,727,948
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,892,542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,204,768
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,874,799)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,442,524)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,432,275)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,432,275)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.975)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.975)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32 (i)

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, I, James G. Rakes, President and Chief Executive Officer of National Bankshares, Inc. (Principal Executive Officer), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)   such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.

 

 

| /s/ JAMES G. RAKES                                                                                |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| James G. RakesChairman President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

  |
§ 370.9 Communication with the FDIC. ( a ) *Point of contact.* Not later than ten business days after either the effective date of this part or becoming a covered institution, a covered institution must notify the FDIC of the person(s) responsible for implementing the recordkeeping and information technology system capabilities required by this part.
( b ) *Address.* Point-of-contact information, reports and requests made under this part shall be submitted in writing to: Office of the Director, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20429-0002.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Aldila, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of Aldila, Inc. hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ PETER R. MATHEWSON Peter R. Mathewson Chief Executive Officer/s/ SCOTT M. BIER Scott M. Bier Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aldila, Inc. and will be retained by Aldila, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

March 29,
2010

---



QuickLinks
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19 - 0668

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BANNER LEE BOYD,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Michael B. Hayworth , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 10 2021

11/10/2021
Case Number: DA 19-0668
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1285

ANTHONY LAWRENCE MCLEAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS HARRIS; ANNETTE DELLAROCCA; VALUJET

AIRLINES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-95-1373-A)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 28, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lawrence McLean, Appellant Pro Se. John Craig Weller,

FILLER, WELLER & TELLO, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. McLean v. Harris, No. CA-95-1373-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 14,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          94,522
<SECURITIES>                                   172,858
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,203
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,101
<PP&E>                                       8,670,068
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,182,050
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,904,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,095,951
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,904,343
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               874,005
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  507,418
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             309,606
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    69,958
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 11

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

#### § 11.83 How can I operate under an exemption outside the United States?

If you want to be able to operate under your exemption outside the United States, you must request this when you petition for relief and give us the reason for this use. If you do not provide your reason or we determine that it does not justify this relief, we will limit your exemption to use within the United States. Before we extend your exemption for use outside the United States, we will verify that the exemption would be in compliance with the Standards of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). If it would not, but we still believe it would be in the public interest to allow you to do so, we will file a difference with ICAO. However, a foreign country still may not allow you to operate in that country without meeting the ICAO standard.
#### B. F. CARSON, Respondent, v. ST. JOSEPH STOCK YARDS COMPANY et al., Appellants.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

December 9, 1912.

1. FALSE IMPRISONMENT: Evidence: Agent. A policeman arrested a man for stealing halters, the property of a corporation. After detaining him a few hours, he was released. In an action for false imprisonment it was sought to show that the corporation ordered, or sanctioned, the arrest, by the admissions of its superintendent made the next day. It was *held*that such evidence was incompetent.

*4442. -: -: -: Res Gestae: Principal and Agent. Am agent cannot bind a corporation by admissions as to a patt transaction. As to that, his agency has ceased, and what he says is not a part of the *res gestae.*

Appeal from Buchanan Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *Wm. D. Rusk,*Judge.

Reversed.

*John E. Dolman*for appellants.

*Chas. C. Crow*for respondent.

ELLISON, J.

This action is based upon a charge of false imprisonment. There was a judgment for plaintiff in the trial court.

There was evidence tending to show that plaintiff was arrested by a policeman and detained for nearly six hours, charged by the policeman with stealing halters belonging to defendant company. Defendant Slack is the superintendent for defendant company, hut there was no evidence that he instigated or caused the arrest, or that he ratified or adopted the act after it became known to him. The demurrer to the evidence which was offered in his behalf should have been sustained.

Plaintiff testified that on the day following his arrest and release, Slack was talking with him about the halters and stated to him that the defendant company had had him arrested, not that he had had anything to do with it. This was sufficient to support a verdict against the company if competent. Slack was the company’s agent. What he said was next day after the arrest and was therefore not a part of the *res gestae,*and was therefore not competent on that ground.

Neither was it competent on the ground of Slack being the company’s agent, since, being spoken the *445next clay, it was not a part of the *res gestae.*It was an account of a past affair, and being past, his agency, as to it, ceased so far as to disable him to bind his principal by admission, or by an account of the transaction! [Adams v. Hannibal & St. Jos. R. R. Co., 74 Mo. 553, 556; Bergeman v. Railroad Co., 104 Mo. 77, 86; Redmon v. Railroad Co., 185 Mo. 1, 12; Frye v. Railroad Co., 200 Mo. 377, 406; Roberts v. Railroad Co., 153 Mo. App. 638, 644.]

The judgment is -reversed.

All concur.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 61]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ061.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 564]]

Public Law 110-61
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 4551 East 52nd Street in Odessa, Texas, as the ``Staff Sergeant Marvin 
   `Rex' Young Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Aug. 9, 2007 -  [H.R. 
                                1425]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT MARVIN ``REX'' YOUNG POST OFFICE 
                              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4551 East 52nd Street in Odessa, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Marvin `Rex' Young Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Marvin `Rex' Young Post Office Building''.

    Approved August 9, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1425:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            May 21, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
----

            COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION         

of 14 March 2006         

concerning the discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the operations of the European Development Fund (Sixth EDF) for the financial year 2004

(2006/220/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Third ACP-EEC Convention, signed at Lomé on 8 December 1984,

Having regard to Internal Agreement 86/126/EEC on the financing and administration of Community aid (1), and in particular Article 29(3) thereof,

Having regard to the Financial Regulation of 11 November 1986 applicable to the Sixth European Development Fund (Sixth EDF) (2), and in particular Articles 66 to 73 thereof,

Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the Sixth EDF as at 31 December 2004 and the Court of Auditors' report concerning the financial year 2004 together with the Commission's replies (3),

Whereas pursuant to Article 29(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the Sixth EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council;

Whereas the overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the Sixth EDF during the financial year 2004 has been satisfactory,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the Sixth EDF for the financial year 2004.

Done at Brussels, 14 March 2006.

For the Council

The President

K.-H. GRASSER            

----

(1)OJ L 86, 31.3.1986, p. 210. Agreement as last amended by Council Decision 86/281/EEC (OJ L 178, 2.7.1986, p. 13).

(2)OJ L 325, 20.11.1986, p. 42.

(3)OJ C 301, 30.11.2005, p. 249.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CAREERENGINE
NETWORK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES' CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)
AND CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE INTERIM
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             953,714
<SECURITIES>                                     2,533,153
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,486,867
<PP&E>                                           1,380,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                     722,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,604,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,640,705
<BONDS>                                          1,756,028
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           674,960
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,828,121)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,604,841
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,296,448
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,820,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 246,875
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,523,675)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        15,340
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,508,335)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (730,318)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,238,653)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.78)


</TABLE>