alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# TIEXEA~TORNEY GxNE!RAL OF TEXAS Aua-. 

## T- rsrll .FOEN L EXCL *-- #3mzxSXaApril 7, 1975
The Honorable Clayton T. Garrison Executive Director Opinion,No. H- 575 Texas Parks andWildlife Department John H. Reagan Building Austin, Texas 78701 Dear Mr. Garrison: Re: Whether the Texas Parks Fund may be used for operational expenses of state parks.

You have requested our opinion concerning the propriety ofan expenditure by the Parks andWildlife Department from Texas Parks Fund 31 for operational expenses ofthe state parks. The current appropriations act contained a general appropriation from Parks Fund 31for use by the Department. Texas Parks Fund 31is established by article 7.06(3), TaxationGeneral, V. T. C.S., which provides inpart: Fifty cents ofthe tax levied under this Article on each 1.000 cigarettes shall be credited to a new special fund known as the Texas ,Parks Fund which may be used by the Parks andWildlife Department for the acquisition, planning, and development of state parks andhistoric sites. This article limits the use of Texas Parks Fund 31to the “acquisition, planning, and development of state parks and historic sites. ‘I This limitation was apparently assumed inAttorney General Opinions M-1164~. (1972) and M-1061 (1972). and similar language inother statutes has been held to establish such alimitation. See Johnson v. Ferguson, 55 S.W. 2d 153(Tex. Civ. App. -- Austin 1932, writzm’d. )

The use ofParks Fund 31for the construction ofa state office building to be used for “wildlife scientific research and comprehensive park and statewide outdoor recreational planning ‘Ihas .been held to bewithin the meaning ofthe limitation. Attorney General Opinion M-952, (1971): Other authorized uses indude planning for the statewide development ofall park lands within the state, M-1164 (1972); andproviding relocation assistance costs

p. 2569The Honorable Clayton T. Garrison - Page 2 (H-575)

involved inthe acquisition ofland for planning and development of state parks and historic sites. M-1061 (1972). These uses were considered tobewithin the limitation ofarticle 7.06( 3) since they pertained to the acquisition, planning, and development of state parks andhistoric sites.

Inour opinion, operational expenses may likewise be pertinent to these activities. Accordingly, tothe extent that the operational expenses of the Department are referable and allocable to the acquisition, planning, or development of state parks andhistoric sites, they may be financed from Texas Parks Fund 31. SUM-MARY To the extent that operational expenses ofthe Parks and UFildlife Department pertain to the acquisition, planning, or development of state parks and.historic sites they may.be financed from Texas Parks Fund .31. Very ~trulyyours,

Attorney General of Texas APROVED:

DAVIDM KE

. NDALL, First Assistant

Opinion Committee jwb

p., 2570
§ 615.5174 Farmer Mac securities. ( a ) *General authority.* You may purchase and hold mortgage securities that are issued or guaranteed as to both principal and interest by the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (Farmer Mac securities). You may purchase and hold Farmer Mac securities for the purposes of managing credit and interest rate risks, and furthering your mission to finance agriculture. The total value of your Farmer Mac securities cannot exceed your total outstanding loans, as defined by § 615.5131.
( b ) *Board and management responsibilities.* Your board of directors must adopt written policies that will govern your investments in Farmer Mac securities. All delegations of authority to specified personnel or committees must state the extent of management's authority and responsibilities for managing your investments in Farmer Mac securities. The board of directors must also ensure that appropriate internal controls are in place to prevent loss, in accordance with § 615.5133(e). Management must submit quarterly reports to the board of directors on the performance of all investments in Farmer Mac securities. Annually, your board of directors must review these policies and the performance of your Farmer Mac securities and make any changes that are needed.
( c ) *Policies.* Your board of directors must establish investment policies for Farmer Mac securities that include your: ( 1 ) *Objectives* for holding Farmer Mac securities.
( 2 ) *Credit risk* parameters including: ( i ) The quantities and types of Farmer Mac mortgage securities that are collateralized by qualified agricultural mortgages, rural home loans, and loans guaranteed by the Farm Service Agency.
( ii ) Product and geographic diversification for the loans that underlie the security; and
( iii ) Minimum pool size, minimum number of loans in each pool, and maximum allowable premiums or discounts on these securities.
( 3 ) *Liquidity risk* tolerance and the liquidity characteristics of Farmer Mac securities that are suitable to meet your institutional objectives. A bank may not include Farmer Mac mortgage securities in the liquidity reserve maintained to comply with § 615.5134.
( 4 ) *Market risk* limits based on the effects that the Farmer Mac securities have on your capital and earnings.
( d ) *Stress test.* You must perform stress tests, in accordance with § 615.5133(h)(1)(iii) and (h)(4), on mortgage securities, issued or guaranteed by Farmer Mac, that are backed by loans that you did not originate.
( e ) *You.* Means a Farm Credit bank, association, or service corporation.
[64 FR 28899, May 28, 1999, as amended at 70 FR 51590, Aug. 31, 2005; 77 FR 66374, Nov. 5, 2012; 83 FR 27503, June 12, 2018]
121 STAT. 722 PUBLIC LAW 110–73—AUG. 9, 2007 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2688 (S. 1596): 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

July 30, considered and passed House. 

Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–73 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 103 South 

Getty Street in Uvalde, Texas, as the ‘‘Dolph Briscoe, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DOLPH BRISCOE, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 103 South Getty Street in Uvalde, Texas, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Dolph Briscoe, Jr. Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Dolph Briscoe, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Approved August 9, 2007. 

Aug. 9, 2007 

[H.R. 2688]
§ 121.569 Equipment interchange: Domestic and flag operations. ( a ) Before operating under an interchange agreement, each certificate holder conducting domestic or flag operations shall show that— ( 1 ) The procedures for the interchange operation conform with this chapter and with safe operating practices;
( 2 ) Required crewmembers and dispatchers meet approved training requirements for the airplanes and equipment to be used and are familiar with the communications and dispatch procedures to be used;
( 3 ) Maintenance personnel meet training requirements for the airplanes and equipment, and are familiar with the maintenance procedures to be used;
( 4 ) Flight crewmembers and dispatchers meet appropriate route and airport qualifications; and
( 5 ) The airplanes to be operated are essentially similar to the airplanes of the certificate holder with whom the interchange is effected with respect to the arrangement of flight instruments and the arrangement and motion of controls that are critical to safety unless the Administrator determines that the certificate holder has adequate training programs to insure that any potentially hazardous dissimilarities are safely overcome by flight crew familiarization.
( b ) Each certificate holder conducting domestic or flag operations shall include the pertinent provisions and procedures involved in the equipment interchange agreement in its manuals.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19219, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2614, Jan. 26, 1996]
§ 1217.103 Authority to certify. ( a ) The following NASA officials, their deputies, and designees within their respective organizations are authorized, under the conditions described herein, to make the certification to the Commissioner of Customs required for the duty-free entry of space articles pursuant to subheading HTSUS 9808.00.80. ( 1 ) The NASA Assistant Administrator for Procurement is authorized to issue the certification for articles imported into the United States which are procured by NASA or by other U.S. Government agencies, or by U.S. Government contractors or subcontractors when title to the articles is or will be vested in the U.S. Government pursuant to the terms of the contract or subcontract. Requests for certification should be sent to: Office of Procurement, Attn: Director, Contract and Grant Policy Division, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546.
( 2 ) The NASA Associate Administrator for International and Interagency Relations is authorized to issue the certification for articles imported into the United States pursuant to international agreements. Requests for certification should be sent to: Office of International and Interagency Relations, Attn: Director, Export Control and Interagency Liaison Division, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546.
( 3 ) The NASA Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations is authorized to issue the certification for articles imported into the United States by persons or entities under agreements other than those identified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, including launch services agreements. Requests for certification should be sent to: Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate, Attn: Director, International Space Station Office, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546.
( b ) Each certification by the officials identified in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of this section shall receive the concurrence of the Office of the General Counsel.
( c ) Subject to procedures established by the officials identified in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) of this section, as appropriate, the Center Procurement Officer or a Program Manager at a NASA Installation who is designated by an official identified in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) of this section may make the certification to the Commissioner of Customs required for the duty-free entry of space articles pursuant to subheading HTSUS 9808.00.80. Such procedures shall include the following requirements: ( 1 ) All such certifications by designated Procurement Officers or Program Managers shall receive the concurrence of the Chief Counsel of the issuing NASA Installation; and
( 2 ) All such certifications by designated Procurement Officers or Program Managers shall be promptly reported to an official identified in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) of this section, as appropriate.
[62 FR 6467, Feb. 12, 1997, as amended at 80 FR 45865, Aug. 3, 2015]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3580 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3580

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the income 
  tax treatment of legal fees awarded or received in connection with 
                   nonphysical personal injury cases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2003

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the income 
  tax treatment of legal fees awarded or received in connection with 
                   nonphysical personal injury cases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Victims Tax Fairness Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL FEES AWARDED OR RECEIVED IN CONNECTION WITH NONPHYSICAL 
              PERSONAL INJURY CASES.

    (a) Inclusion in Gross Income.--Part II of subchapter B of chapter 
1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items specifically 
included in gross income) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new section:

``SEC. 91. LEGAL FEES AWARDED OR RECEIVED IN CONNECTION WITH 
              NONPHYSICAL PERSONAL INJURY CASES.

    ``Gross income includes amounts awarded to or received by the 
taxpayer, whether by suit or agreement, on account of nonphysical 
personal injury which are designated for attorneys' fees and costs.''.
    (b) Deduction For Legal Fees Awarded or Received In Connection With 
Nonphysical Personal Injury Cases Allowed Whether or Not Taxpayer 
Elects To Itemize.--Subsection (a) of section 62 of such Code (relating 
to general rule) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(19) Legal fees awarded or received in connection with 
        nonphysical personal injury cases.--Attorneys' fees and costs 
        awarded to or paid by the taxpayer, whether by suit or 
        agreement, on account of nonphysical personal injury.''.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for part II of 
subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by adding at the end 
the following new item:

                              ``Sec. 91. Legal fees awarded or received 
                                        in connection with nonphysical 
                                        personal injury cases.''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to judgments and settlements entered after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
File code: NEPA register# DOI-BLM-OR-P060-2000-0009-EIS 

Plan Maintenance 

Upper Deschutes Resource Management Plan 


Prineville District Bureau of Land Management, Prineville Oregon 


Program 

Visual Resources, pages 98-102 and Map 10. 

Change 

Add a map showing visual resource management (VRM) class for the area upstream from Opal 

Springs (about five air miles southwest of Culver, Oregon). This map supersedes that portion of 

Upper Deschutes RMP Map 10. 

Reason 

The VRM class allocations in the Upper Deschutes RMP (shown on Map 10) were developed 

through an inventory process, which includes identification of viewpoints, distance zones, 

existing landscape quality, and viewer sensitivity levels. As identified in BLM Handbook H-8410­

1, the inventory process provides the BLM manager with a means for determining visual values 

and provides the basis for considering these in the RMP process. This inventory work was done 

for the portion of the Crooked River canyon adjacent to Crooked River Ranch and upstream of 

the Wild and Scenic River (WSR) Boundary. No inventory was done for the parcel adjacent to 

and downstream of the WSR boundary, around Opal Springs. This parcel includes a dam, 

roadway, and structures associated with an energy withdrawal. Currently there are no 

inventory derived VRM classes for this area in the RMP. The new map provides VRM classes 

that account for the existing developments on the parcel. 

Concurrence 

I have consulted with my staff regarding the plan maintenance described above, and concur 

that the action is administrative. The maintenance refines or documents a previously approved 

decision incorporated in the existing RMP. It does not result in expansion in the scope of 

resource uses or restrictions, and it does not change the terms, conditions, and decisions of the 

existing RMP. The maintenance action is part of the official direction of the RMP. 

eschutes Field Manager Date 

Attachment: Addendum to Upper Deschutes RMP Map 10, VRM Class for Opal Springs 
Addendum to Upper Deschutes Resource Management Plan Map 10: Opal Springs VRM 

Visual Resource Management Class UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

IZZ] VRM 2- Largely retain the existing cha racter of the landscape Bureau of Land Management 

VRM 3- Partially retain the existing character of the landscape 

D VRM 4 - Modification of the character of the landscape is allowed 

700 No ·,•1crranty is modc> by tne Bureau o! l ancf Managf-rneru Or-.,-.,--r-r---r---.r-r--l Wild & Scenic River Corridor ,;s to the ct racy, rP IIab ilt ty~ or con\pleteness 

PRINEVILLE DISTRICT, OREGON I IIIII ~ cf !.\lr,;t; data forindM dualor .<ggre@i'lleuse 

·.·.ith ot'he r dat;; Original dc.t~ w<"fCl tompllr d I rom 

Bureau of Land Management 'l<lriOLI S sou rc£·S ~nd m<~y hC' updated wirhout llotl fi'c;m nn Feet 

October 2014
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.43

March 15, 2001




Stephen A. Snider
5565 Cedar Creek
Houston, Texas 7056

Dear Steve:

         It has been decided by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc., to provide you and your wife
with post-retirement medical benefits. These benefits will not be extended to
other dependents. Eligibility requirements and benefits of this program are as
follows:

Eligibility Requirements
To be eligible for post-retirement medical benefits, you must remain and active
employee of Universal Compression until your retirement. Should you be released
by the Company for Cause, you will not be eligible for post-retirement benefits.

Benefits
Upon satisfying the eligibility requirements outlined above, you will be
eligible to continue in the medical benefits programs that you are enrolled in
while as an active employee. This continuation will be for both the regular
Medical Plan as provided by Universal as well as the Executive Medical Benefit
Plan. There will be no monthly cost to you for these post-retirement benefits.

Until eligible for Medicare, these post-retirement benefits will be your primary
medical coverage. Upon becoming eligible for Medicare, these post-retirement
benefits will then serve as secondary coverage, with Medicare being your primary
coverage. You must enroll in Medicare when first eligible in order to continue
to receive these post-retirement benefits. These benefits will be offered to you
and your spouse through the balance of your lives.

Should you pre-decease your wife, these benefits shall be extended to her, on
the same terms and conditions, until her death.





<PAGE>   2

Stephen A. Snider
Page 2
March 15, 2001


If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please acknowledge such agreement
below.

                                   Sincerely,
                                   Universal Compression Holdings, Inc.
                                   Compensation Committee


                                   By:   /s/ JOHN K. CASTLE
                                       ----------------------------------
                                         John K. Castle
                                         Chairman, Compensation Committee

AGREED AND ACCEPTED


  /s/ STEPHEN A. SNIDER
--------------------------
Stephen A. Snider
Date:  April 18, 2001
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Martin D. Kidder, Chief Financial Officer of Verso Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated:  November 14, 2007

 

|   | /s/Martin D. Kidder |
|--------|---------------------|

Martin D. Kidder,

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 14(a)(1)(ii)

[ERNST & YOUNG LOGO]

                Report of Independent Accountants on Management's
                    Assertion on Compliance with the Minimum
               Servicing Standards Set Forth in the Uniform Single
                    Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

The Audit Committee
PNC Bank Corp.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report
titled Report of Management on Compliance with the Minimum Servicing Standards
Set Forth in the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, that
except for noncompliance with the minimum servicing standard for custodial bank
accounts, Midland Loan Services, Inc. (MLS), a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC
Bank Corp., complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers (USAP) except for commercial loan and multifamily loan
servicing, minimum servicing standards V.4 and VI.1, which the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America has interpreted as inapplicable to such servicing during
the year ended December 31, 1998. Management is responsible for MLS' compliance
with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertions about MLS' compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining on a test basis, evidence about MLS' compliance with those
requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in
the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on MLS'
compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that except for noncompliance with the
minimum servicing standard for custodial account reconciliations, MLS complied
with the aforementioned requirements during the year ended December 31, 1998, is
fairly stated, in all material respects.

As discussed in management's assertion, the following material noncompliance
occurred at MLS during the year ended December 31, 1998. With regard to standard
I.4, reconciling items exist which have not been resolved within 90 calendar
days of their original identification.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

January 22, 1999

       Ernst & Young LLP is a member of Ernst & Young International, Ltd.


                                      -10-