alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
January 11, 2000. 

# AGENCY:

 Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA). 

# ACTION:

 Issuing a directive to the Commissioner of Customs reducing a limit. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

 January 19, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Naomi Freeman, International Trade Specialist, Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce, (202) 482-4212. For information on the quota status of this limit, refer to the Quota Status Reports posted on the bulletin boards of each Customs port, call (202) 927-5850, or refer to the U.S. Customs website at http://www.customs.ustreas.gov. For information on embargoes and quota re-openings, call (202) 482-3715. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 

Start Printed Page 2588Authority: Section 204 of the Agricultural Act of 1956, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1854); Executive Order 11651 of March 3, 1972, as amended. The current limit for Category 443 is being reduced for carryforward used.                         A description of the textile and apparel categories in terms of HTS numbers is available in the CORRELATION: Textile and Apparel Categories with the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (see                         **Federal Register**                         notice 64 FR 71982, published on December 22, 1999). Also see 64 FR 50495, published on September 17, 1999.                     

Troy H. Cribb, 

Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.

Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements

Commissioner of Customs, 

*Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC 20229.*

Dear Commissioner: This directive amends, but does not cancel, the directive issued to you on September 13, 1999, by the Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements. That directive concerns imports of certain cotton, wool and man-made fiber textile products, produced or manufactured in Costa Rica and exported during the twelve-month period which began on January 1, 2000 and extends through December 31, 2000. 

                    Effective on January 19, 2000, you are directed to reduce the current limit for Category 443 to 212,012 numbers [1]                                         , as provided for under the Uruguay Round Agreement on Textiles and Clothing. The guaranteed access level for Category 443 remains unchanged.                 

The Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements has determined that this action falls within the foreign affairs exception of the rulemaking provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1). 

Sincerely, 

Troy H. Cribb, 

Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements. 

# Footnotes

1.                             The limit has not been adjusted to account for any imports exported after December 31, 1999.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-1041 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DR-F
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3724 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3724

 To amend section 220 of the National Housing Act to make a technical 
   correction to restore allowable increases in the maximum mortgage 
 limits for FHA-insured mortgages for multifamily housing projects to 
     cover increased costs of installing a solar energy system or 
               residential energy conservation measures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 2004

 Mr. Shays (for himself, Mrs. Maloney, and Mr. Simmons) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 220 of the National Housing Act to make a technical 
   correction to restore allowable increases in the maximum mortgage 
 limits for FHA-insured mortgages for multifamily housing projects to 
     cover increased costs of installing a solar energy system or 
               residential energy conservation measures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Efficient Housing Technical 
Correction Act''.

SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

    Section 220(d)(3)(B)(iii)(V) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 
1715k(d)(3)(B)(iii)(V)) is amended by striking ``with respect to 
rehabilitation projects involving not more than five family units,''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2023087EN.01003801.xml

| 9.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 87/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 87/38

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur dated 4 November 2022 in the case of Birgir Þór Gylfason and Jórunn S. Gröndal v Landsbankinn hf.

(Case E-13/22)

(2023/C 87/11)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court, dated 4 November 2022, from Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur (Reykjavik District Court), which was received at the Court Registry on 4 November 2022, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Birgir Þór Gylfason and Jórunn S. Gröndal v Landsbankinn hf., on the following question:

Is it compatible with Directive 2014/17/EU (1), in particular, Article 24 of the Directive, and, as appropriate, Article 10(2)(f) of Directive 2008/48/EC (2) (cf. recital 19 of the Preamble to Directive 2014/17/EU), that the terms of a consumer property mortgage, in which the interest rate is variable, state that adjustments of the interest rate are to take account of, amongst other things, the Central Bank of Iceland’s interest rate, interest rates on the market and other terms of finance available to the creditor?

---

(1)  OJ L 60, 28.2.2014, p. 34.

(2)  OJ L 133, 22.5.2008, p. 66.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             755
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,535
<INVENTORY>                                     44,344
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,913
<PP&E>                                          32,403
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,675
<BONDS>                                          2,900
<COMMON>                                            42
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   114,687
<SALES>                                         69,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,360
<CGS>                                           56,785
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,272
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   625
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,022
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,134
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,888
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,888
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
        

</TABLE>
Skip Links

USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Digital Data Series 69–N 

Pubs Warehouse

----

**Suggested citation:**

Higley, D.K., compiler, 2007, Petroleum  systems and assessment of undiscovered oil and gas in the Raton Basin–Sierra  Grande Uplift Province, Colorado and New Mexico—USGS Province 41: U.S. GeologicalSurvey Digital Data Series DDS–69–N, 141 p. 

----

Download the latest version of Acrobat Reader, free of charge
access.adobe.com
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 Certification of Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) I, Allan J. Marter, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Golden Star Resources
Ltd., certify, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the period ended December 31, 2004 of Golden Star Resources Ltd. that: (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Golden Star Resources Ltd. /s/ Allan J. Marter
Allan J. Marter
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
April 28, 2005
#### LOVE’S ADMINISTRATOR *v.*FREER AND CLARK.

Equity — want of in a complainant who insists upon Ills legal advantages.

Where the complainant refuses to make an offset or allowance of the demand of his debtor, and insists upon payment, or to have each claim settled in a court of law, he will not be permitted afterwards to come into chancery to set off one judgment against the other— insisting upon the adjustment of law, he will be left to enjoy the fruits of it.

Chancery. The complainant alleges that in February, 1828, he recovered a judgment against Freer, *who is*insolvent, and that the *413judgment yet remains unpaid. That in April, 1829, Freer for the use of Clark, recovered a judgment for a greater sum against the complainant as administrator, upon a contract between his intestate and Freer, which was assigned to Freer after Love’s death, with notice that the complainant held the note on which the judgment was afterwards recovered, as an offset. The bill prays to have complainant’s judgment set off against so much of Freer’s judgment.

Clark, in his answer, sets out the original contract on which the judgment was had for his use, and says he bought and paid for it, and at the time he purchased, adjusted the amount with Geddes, then executor of Love, at a sum so much greater than the amount he recovered, as would more than equal the complainant’s judgment. He avers moreover, that at the trial of the suit brought by the complainant against Freer, it was offered to endorse the amount of the note on the contract, which the complainant refused. That on the trial of the suit upon the contract, it was again offered to the complainant to credit on the contract the amount of the note which he again refused. That by a mistake in the breaches assigned, of which the complainant availed himself, the judgment against the complainant was reduced about one half below what should have been recovered, and nearly double the amount of the complainant’s judgment; but that he is now willing to allow the setoff, if the accounts are opened and fairly adjusted, and he is paid the unnecessary costs he has been put to by the complainant.

*Freer*does not answer. There is a general replication.

*McConnell*and Marshall, for the complainant.

*Webb,*for Clark.

By the Court.

The complainant appears before us with little claim to equity. In both the suits he has had offered to him, and refused to accept, what he now asks, because, he as administrator, was both to *collect and pay,*and he therefore would not set off one debt against another. He now refuses to open the transactions adjusted by the judgments after his refusal, and to settle on fair principles of justice. What equity can such a man have which we ought to protect? Refusing to do justice himself, he asks of a court of equity to enable him to avail himself of the fruits of his technical advantage in the judgment!

The bill is dismisséd with costs.
Exhibit 31.1


                     Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
                     --------------------------------------

I, Arnie Geller, certify that:


1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-Q/A  Amendment  No.1 of
PREMIER EXHIBITIONS, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
<PAGE>

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls.

Date: July 31, 2006

/s/ Arnie Geller
----------------
Arnie Geller,
President and Chief Executive Officer
221207 EXHIBIT B. WITNESS COVER SHEET VERSION DECEMBER 7, 2022 1

EXHIBIT B1

PARTY WITNESS COVER SHEET

Name of Party 

Does the Party intend to offer a witness? 

Total Number of Witnesses

Witness Name Expert or Fact 

Witness

Is interpreter 

required?

(Proponent of 

witness must 

provide 

certified 

interpreter)* 

Scope of Testimony

*The Court does not provide interpreters for witness testimony. 

1 This Party Witness Cover Sheet must be attached to a party in interest’s Informative 

Motion as Exhibit B.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23015-2 Filed:12/07/22 Entered:12/07/22 12:52:59 Desc:

Exhibit B - Witness Cover Sheet Page 1 of 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1284 

KA 08-02025 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

ROBERT RICHARDSON, ALSO KNOWN AS HANIF RICHARDSON,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PHILIP ROTHSCHILD OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County

(John J. Brunetti, A.J.), rendered July 7, 2008. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first

degree and assault in the first degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32 (ii)

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, I, J. Robert Buchanan, Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)   such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.

 

 

| /s/ J. ROBERT BUCHANAN                                    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| J. Robert BuchananTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer) |
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.39 Exceptions to recommended decision. ( a ) *Filing exceptions.* Within 30 days after service of the recommended decision, findings, conclusions, and proposed order under § 747.38, a party may file with the NCUA Board written exceptions to the ALJ's recommended decision, findings, conclusions, or proposed order, to the admission or exclusion of evidence, or to the failure of the ALJ to make a ruling proposed by a party. A supporting brief may be filed at the time the exceptions are filed, either as part of the same document or in a separate document.
( b ) *Effect of failure to file or raise exceptions.* ( 1 ) Failure of a party to file exceptions to those matters specified in paragraph (a) of this section within the time prescribed is deemed a waiver of objection thereto.
( 2 ) No exception need be considered by the NCUA Board if the party taking exception had an opportunity to raise the same objection, issue, or argument before the ALJ and failed to do so.
( c ) *Contents.* ( 1 ) All exceptions and briefs in support of such exceptions must be confined to the particular matters in, or omissions from, the ALJ's recommendations to which that party takes exception.
( 2 ) All exceptions and briefs in support of exceptions must set forth page or paragraph references to the specific parts of the ALJ's recommendations to which exception is taken, the page or paragraph references to those portions of the record relied upon to support each exception, and the legal authority relied upon to support each exception.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 82 (Thursday, April 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

April 6, 2000.
    The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) has submitted the following 
public information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. 
Interested persons may obtain copies of the submission(s) by calling 
the OTS Clearance Officer listed. Send comments regarding this 
information collection to the OMB reviewer listed and to the OTS 
Clearance Officer, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., 
Washington, D.C. 20552.

DATES: Submit written comments on or before May 30, 2000.
    OMB Number: 1550-0092.
    Form Number: Not applicable.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Title: Deposits.
    Description: 12. CFR Part 557 relies on the disclosure requirements 
applicable to savings associations under the Federal Reserve Board's 
Regulation DD (12 CFR Part 230). The information required by Regulation 
DD is needed by OTS in order to supervise savings associations and 
develop regulatory policy.
    Respondents: Savings and Loan Associations and Savings Banks.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 1,104.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Response: 1,484 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Once per event.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 1,638,704 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Mary Rawlings-Milton, (202) 906-6028, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20552.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 
20503.

John E. Werner,
Director, Information & Management Services Division.
[FR Doc. 00-10449 Filed 4-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) 10-QSB
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         204,549
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  303,703
<ALLOWANCES>                                    47,820
<INVENTORY>                                  2,058,273
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,518,706
<PP&E>                                         214,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 129,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,610,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,078,970
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    560,000
<COMMON>                                        32,816
<OTHER-SE>                                    (61,235)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,610,551
<SALES>                                        260,675
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               260,675
<CGS>                                           96,429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               857,790
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (698,686)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (700,486)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (700,486)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>