alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Innodata  Isogen,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Jack
Abuhoff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

1.    the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


                                                  /s/
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                  Jack Abuhoff
                                                  Chairman of the Board,
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  President
                                                  March 26, 2004

<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Innodata  Isogen,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
Agress,  Principal  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act OF 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

1.         the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) of
           the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.         the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


                                                  /s/
                                                  -------------------------
                                                  Stephen Agress
                                                  Vice President, Finance and
                                                  Chief Accounting Officer
                                                  March 26, 2004
|                                                                       | March 31,  |        | December 31, |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------|--------------|
| (In billions)                                                              | 2011  |        | 2010    |
|                                                                       |       |        |         |   |   |
| GECC total assets                                                          | $          | 569.8  |         | $ | 581.1  |
|       Less assets of discontinued operations |       | 5.1    |         |   | 6.9  |
|       Less non-interest bearing liabilities  |       | 36.9   |         |   | 38.9  |
| GE Capital ENI                                                             |       | 527.8  |         |   | 535.3  |
|       Less cash and equivalents              |       | 66.5   |         |   | 59.5  |
| GE Capital ENI, excluding cash and equivalents                             | $          | 461.3  |         | $ | 475.8  |
|                                                                       |       |        |         |   |   |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. GT00-19-001]

Take notice that on March 29, 2000, Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC (KM Interstate) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, the following tariff revised sheets, to be effective December 28, 1999:

*Fourth Revised Volume No. 1-A*

Substitute Original Sheet No. 3

*Second Revised Volume No. 1-C*

Substitute Original Sheet No. 3

KM Interstate states that the filing is being made in compliance with the Commission's Letter order dated March 16, 2000 in Docket No. GT00-19-000.

KM Interstate states that copies of the filing have been served upon all interested parties and affected state regulatory commissions.

Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10334  Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]

                BILLING CODE 6717-01-M                      ( print page 24462)
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                   QUIPP, INC.

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
          REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
                       OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350




         I, Michael S. Kady, Chief Executive Officer of Quipp, Inc., a Florida
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:

         (1)      The Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
                  ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with
                  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
                  Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.







/s/ MICHAEL S. KADY
-------------------------------
Michael S. Kady
Chief Executive Officer

Date:    November 14, 2006
SPA 14
 

• 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 119 

Toxicity Characteristic Revision; 

TCLP Correction 

57 FR 55114-55117
 

November 24, 1992
 

as amended on February 2, 1993 at 58 FR 6854
 

(RCRA Cluster III, HSWA provisions)
 

Note: The November 24, 1992 rule amends the version of the TCLP that was added to 

Appendix II to Part 261 by the March"29, 1990 final rule (55 FR 11798;" Revision Checklist 74), 

concurrent with the removal of the old version of the TCLP from Appendix I to Part 268. 

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRA CITATION 

ANALOGOUS STATE 

CITATION 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

EaulV 

- ALENT 

LESS 

STRIN 

- GENT 

MORE 

STAIN . 

GENT 

BROADE 

RIN 

SCOPE 

PART 261 -IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE WAC 173-303
 

APPENDIX II TO PART 261
 

I.
 

1 

o 

• CL119.14 - Revised: 2/11/93

November 24, 1992 - Page 1 of 2 Printed: 5/23/96 

t METHOD 1311 TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP)
 

change "data isP to 

"data are": delete 

sentence regarding 

bias determined from 

matrix spike 

determination and 

parenthetical 

reference phrase 

following it Appendix II, 8.2 110(3)(f) X 

change P may not be 

not less" to "may not 

be less" Appendix II, 8.2.2 110(3)(f) X 

remove SUbparagraph Appendix II, 8.2.5 110(3)(f) X 

redesignate former Appendix "II, 8.4 110(3)(f) X 

8.4 as 8.5; add new Appendix II, 8.4.1 110(3)(f) X 

8.4 and 

subparagraphs Appendix II, 8.4.2 110(3)(f) X 

addressing use of 

internal calibration Appendix II, 8.4.3 110(3)(f) X 

quantitation methods Appendix II, 8.4.4 110(3)(f) X 
SPA 14 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 119: Toxicity Characteristic Revision; 

.TCLP Correction (cont'd) 

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRACITATION. 

ANALOGOUS STATE 

CITATION 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

EaulV . 

ALENT 

LESS 

STRIN . 

Gel! 

MORE 

STRIN . 

GENT 

BROADE 

RIN 

SCOPE 

former 8.4 becomes 

8.5 Appendix II, 8.5 110(3)(f) X 

2
 

1	 There is a typographical error in the November 24, 1992 Federal Register; "84.4.4" should 

be "8.4.4." The February 2, 1993 rule made this correction. 

2	 There is a typographical error in the Federal Register; in the table at 8.5, second column 

heading, there should be a space between ''TCLP".and "extraction." 

c 

CL119.14· Revised: 2/11/93

November 24, 1992 - Page 2 of 2 Printed: 5/23196
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-12084

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

THE CREST AT BERKELEY LAKE, 

THE MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus

CECILIA WARD, 

and all other occupants,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

USCA11 Case: 24-12084 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 08/01/2024 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-12084

D.C. Docket No. 1:24-cv-02539-SCJ

____________________

Before WILSON, NEWSOM, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Cecilia Ward, pro se, appeals directly from the magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation (“R&R”) that her case be remanded to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. However, the district court had not adopted the R&R or otherwise rendered it final when Ward appealed, and a later adoption cannot 

cure the premature appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Donovan v. Sarasota Concrete Co., 693 F.2d 1061, 1066-67 (11th Cir. 1982) (explaining 

that magistrate judge orders issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) 

are not final and may not be appealed until rendered final by a district court); Perez-Priego v. Alachua Cnty. Clerk of Ct., 148 F.3d 1272, 

1273 (11th Cir. 1998) (holding that a magistrate judge’s R&R that 

has not been adopted by the district court is not final and immediately appealable).

No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies 

with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all 

other applicable rules.

USCA11 Case: 24-12084 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 08/01/2024 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32 (ii)

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, I, J. Robert Buchanan, Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)      such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.

 

 

| /s/ J. ROBERT BUCHANAN                                    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| J. Robert BuchananTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer) |
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3690

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2 West Main Street in Batavia, New York, as the ‘‘Barber Conable 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2003

Mr. REYNOLDS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2 West Main Street in Batavia, New York, 

as the ‘‘Barber Conable Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BARBER CONABLE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 2 West Main Street in Batavia, 

6 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Barber 

7 Conable Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2

•HR 3690 IH 

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the Barber Conable Post 

3 Office Building.

Æ
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 14

- 00081

- CV EX PARTE Efrem G. CASILLAS Original Habeas Corp us Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone , Chief Justice S andee Bryan Marion , Justice Marialyn Barnard , Justice Delivered and Filed: March 5, 2014
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DENIED On February 3 , 2014, relator Efrem G. Casillas filed an original pro se habeas corpus proceeding. Relator alleges that he has been illegally confined to county jail after being held in contempt for failure to pay previously ordered child support. Relator p rovides numerous grounds upon which he believes he is entitled to habeas corpus relief and seeks to be released from custody. However, it is relator’s burden to provide this court with a record sufficient to establish his right to habeas corpus relief. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(k)(1) (D) (if a writ of ha beas corpus is sought, relator must include in the appendix proof that the relator is being restrained) ; T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.7(a) (1)

- (2) (a relator must file with the petition: (1) “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator ’s claim for relief and that was fil ed in any underlying

1 This proceeding aris es out of Cause No. 1999CI01979, styled Efrem G. Casillas v. Imelda L. Arocha , pending in the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Jim Rausch presiding.04

- 14

- 00081

- CV proceeding; ” and (2) “a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from any

u nderlying proceeding”) ; Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Relator has failed to provide us with a record to support his claims such as the order complained of, proof of restraint, or the reporter’s record from the hearing

. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

PER CURIAM

- 2

-
# Europos Sąjungos C 402I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 402I |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 64 metai2021m. spalio 5d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 402I

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

64 metai2021m. spalio 5d.

---

| Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Pranešimai |
| | EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI |
| | Audito Rūmai |
| 2021/C 402 I/01 | dėl Komisijos pasiūlymo dėl Tarybos reglamento, kuriuo iš dalies keičiamas Reglamentas (ES, Euratomas) Nr. 609/2014, siekiant užtikrinti valstybėms narėms didesnį nuspėjamumą ir patikslinti ginčų, kylančių teikiant tradicinius, PVM ir BNP pagrįstus nuosavus išteklius, sprendimo procedūras (2021 06 25, COM(2021) 327 final, 2021/0161 (NLE)) Nuomonė Nr. 2/2021 | 1 |

Turinys

Puslapis

IV   Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Audito Rūmai

2021/C 402 I/01

dėl Komisijos pasiūlymo dėl Tarybos reglamento, kuriuo iš dalies keičiamas Reglamentas (ES, Euratomas) Nr. 609/2014, siekiant užtikrinti valstybėms narėms didesnį nuspėjamumą ir patikslinti ginčų, kylančių teikiant tradicinius, PVM ir BNP pagrįstus nuosavus išteklius, sprendimo procedūras (2021 06 25, COM(2021) 327 final, 2021/0161 (NLE)) Nuomonė Nr. 2/2021

final

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

IV Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Audito Rūmai

| 2021 10 5 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CI 402/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2021 10 5

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CI 402/1

---

Nuomonė Nr. 2/2021

dėl Komisijos pasiūlymo dėl Tarybos reglamento, kuriuo iš dalies keičiamas Reglamentas (ES, Euratomas) Nr. 609/2014, siekiant užtikrinti valstybėms narėms didesnį nuspėjamumą ir patikslinti ginčų, kylančių teikiant tradicinius, PVM ir BNP pagrįstus nuosavus išteklius, sprendimo procedūras (2021 06 25, COM(2021) 327 final, 2021/0161 (NLE))

(2021/C 402 I/01)

Europos Audito Rūmai šiuo raštu jus informuoja, kad 2021 m. spalio 5 d. bus paskelbta Nuomonė Nr. 2/2021 dėl Komisijos pasiūlymo dėl Tarybos reglamento, kuriuo iš dalies keičiamas Reglamentas (ES, Euratomas) Nr. 609/2014, siekiant užtikrinti valstybėms narėms didesnį nuspėjamumą ir patikslinti ginčų, kylančių teikiant tradicinius, PVM ir BNP pagrįstus nuosavus išteklius, sprendimo procedūras (2021 06 25, COM(2021) 327 final, 2021/0161 (NLE)).

Nuomonė bus pateikta susipažinti arba parsisiųsti 2021 m. spalio 5 d. nuo 17.00 val. Europos Audito Rūmų interneto svetainėje:

https://www.eca.europa.eu/lt/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=59435

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3400

To amend the reclamation laws to clarify that certain man-made facilities 

that receive water from a Bureau of Reclamation Project are not navigable waters. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2003

Mr. OTTER (for himself, Mr. CANNON, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. NUNES, Mr. OSE, 

and Mr. PEARCE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To amend the reclamation laws to clarify that certain manmade facilities that receive water from a Bureau of Reclamation Project are not navigable waters.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MAN-MADE FACILITIES THAT RECEIVE WATER 

4 FROM A BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PROJECT 

5 ARE NOT NAVIGABLE WATERS. 

6 The first section of the Act of July 4, 1955 (chapter 

7 271; 43 U.S.C. 421a), is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘That distribution and drainage 

9 systems’’ and inserting the following: 
2

•HR 3400 IH 

1 ‘‘SEC. 1. (a) Distribution and drainage systems’’; and 

2 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(b) Except for reservoirs in navigable streams or riv4 ers, man-made facilities that receive water from a Bureau 

5 of Reclamation Project and store or convey water for irri6 gation or drainage purposes, shall not be considered to be 

7 navigable waters of the United States.’’.

Æ
§ 1206.301 Describing records sought. In view of the time limits under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6) for an initial determination on a request for an Agency record, a request must meet the following requirements: ( a ) The request must be addressed to an appropriate FOIA office or otherwise be clearly identified in the letter as a request for an Agency record under the “Freedom of Information Act.”
( b ) Requesters must describe the records sought in sufficient detail to enable Agency personnel who are familiar with the subject area of the request to identify and locate the record with a reasonable amount of effort. To the extent possible, requesters should include specific information that may assist a FOIA office in identifying the requested records, such as the date, title or name, author, recipient, subject matter of the record, case number, file designation, or reference number. In general, requesters should include as much detail as possible about the specific records or the types of records sought.
( c ) If NASA, after receiving a request, determines that the request does not reasonably describe the records sought, it shall inform the requester what additional information is needed or why the request is otherwise insufficient. Requesters who are attempting to reformulate or modify such a request may discuss their request with the NASA's designated FOIA contact or the Principal Agency FOIA Officer, each of whom is available to assist the requester in reasonably describing the records sought. If a request does not reasonably describe the records sought, the Agency's response to the request may be delayed or NASA may at its discretion close the request administratively.
( d ) Requests for clarification or more information will be made in writing (either via U.S. mail or electronic mail whenever possible). Requesters may respond by U.S. mail or by electronic mail regardless of the method used by NASA to transmit the request for additional information. In order to be considered timely, responses to requests for additional information must be postmarked or received by electronic mail within twenty (20) working days of the postmark date or date of the electronic mail request for additional information or received by electronic mail by 11:59:59 p.m. ET on the 20th working day. If the requester does not respond to a request for additional information within the 20 working days, the request may be administratively closed at NASA's discretion. This administrative closure does not prejudice the requester's ability to submit a new request for further consideration with additional information.
( e ) NASA need not comply with a blanket or categorical request (such as “all matters relating to” a general subject) where it is not reasonably feasible to determine what record is sought.
( f ) NASA will in good faith attempt to identify and locate the record(s) sought and will consult with the requester when necessary and appropriate for that purpose in accordance with these regulations.
( g ) NASA is not required to create or compile records in response to a FOIA request.
[79 FR 46678, Aug. 11, 2014, as amended at NASA-2019-0005, 84 FR 54775, Oct. 11, 2019]