alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT E-1 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19995-10 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 17:51:17 Desc:

Exhibit E-1 -Ana L. Ros En Page 1 of 6
Certified to be a correct and true translation from the source text in Spanish to the target language English.

12/JANUARY2022 - Andreea I. Boscor ATA-certified Spanish-English #525556

By Targem Translations Inc.

[handwritten page:]

September 20, 2021

To: Prime Clerk

From: Ana Luna Rios

Re: Letter received, to which I enclose response. I request a response and to indicate to me which are 

the [illegible] which were presented to you. I object to the denial. I am not in agreement with the 

rejection, so I request I be guided as to which are the clarifications. I am not in agreement with the 

decision. I am enclosing the letter for your corresponding action. Thank you very much. I await response 

in writing.

[Signature]

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19995-10 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 17:51:17 Desc:

Exhibit E-1 -Ana L. Ros En Page 2 of 6
Certified to be a correct and true translation from the source text in Spanish to the target language English.

12/JANUARY2022 - Andreea I. Boscor ATA-certified Spanish-English #525556

By Targem Translations Inc.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19995-10 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 17:51:17 Desc:

Exhibit E-1 -Ana L. Ros En Page 3 of 6
Certified to be a correct and true translation from the source text in Spanish to the target language English.

12/JANUARY2022 - Andreea I. Boscor ATA-certified Spanish-English #525556

By Targem Translations Inc.

2

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19995-10 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 17:51:17 Desc:

Exhibit E-1 -Ana L. Ros En Page 4 of 6
Certified to be a correct and true translation from the source text in Spanish to the target language English.

12/JANUARY2022 - Andreea I. Boscor ATA-certified Spanish-English #525556

By Targem Translations Inc.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19995-10 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 17:51:17 Desc:

Exhibit E-1 -Ana L. Ros En Page 5 of 6
TRANSLATOR’S CERTIFICATE OF TRANSLATION

Translation from: Spanish (Puerto Rico) into English (US)

TARGEM Translations Inc.

I, Andreea I. Boscor, ATA-certified Spanish-English #525556, acting as translator at TARGEM Translations Inc., a NEW 

YORK City corporation, with its principal office at 185 Clymer Street, Brooklyn, NY, 11211, USA, certify that:

the English translated document is a true and accurate translation of the original Spanish and has been translated to 

the best of my knowledge.

Original Document Name: Claim No. 174092_374 Omni

 

Signed this 12th of January 2022 

__________________________ 

 Andreea I. Boscor

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19995-10 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 17:51:17 Desc:

Exhibit E-1 -Ana L. Ros En Page 6 of 6
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-62243, 33-00020, 333-94121, 333-38725, 333-107092, 333-107093, 333-125390 and 333-127580 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Nos. 33-81772 and 333-80427 on Form S-3 and Registration StatementNo. 333-139581 on Form S-3ASR of our report dated February 27, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Post Properties, Inc., and the effectiveness of Post Properties, Inc.’sinternal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Post Properties, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

February 27, 2009
#### § 4.63 Policy.

The OCC's policy is to ensure that MWOBs and IDOBs have the opportunity to participate, to the maximum extent possible, in contracts awarded by the OCC. The OCC awards contracts consistent with the principles of full and open competition and best value acquisition, and with the concept of contracting for agency needs at the lowest practicable cost. The OCC ensures that MWOBs and IDOBs have the opportunity to participate fully in all contracting activities that the OCC enters into for goods and services, whether generated by the headquarters office in Washington, DC, or any other office of the OCC. Contracting opportunities may include small purchase awards, contracts above the small purchase threshold, and delivery orders issued against other governmental agency contracts.
Regional Center BUENOS AIRES NORTE

November 2013

Carlos Ortiz 46 – Chivilcoy - Bs. As.- CP 6620

Tel/Fax: 02346-436271/72/73
• Head Office: Calle 22 No 118 - Navarro BA

• Area of the territory: 1.617 Km2 / 161.716 Hectares.

• Agents:

 1 Veterinarian

 1 Administrative

Contact:

Tel/Fax: 02272 - 430823 

E-mail: navarro@senasa.gob.ar

Regional Center BUENOS AIRES NORTE

Office NAVARRO
Species

Animal Population

OL Navarro

Bovine 125.272

Ovine 4.361

Porcine 6.986

Caprine 60

Equidae 3.994

Regional Center BUENOS AIRES NORTE

Thematic Coordination of Animal Health

Office NAVARRO, Animal Population:

Source: SIGSA SIGSA Integrated Animal Health Management System
Type of Farm Number

Breeding 391

Winter fattening 313

Feed-Lots 7

Dairies 176

Breeding Centers 5

Source: SIGSA Integrated Animal Health Management System

Regional Center BUENOS AIRES NORTE

Thematic Coordination of Animal Health

Office NAVARRO, Number of Bovine Farms:
Type Period Year

Vaccinated 

Farms

Vaccinated 

P.U.

Vaccinated 

Bovines

Totals 2° 2012 540 605 145.868

Younger 1° 2013 532 597 78.980

Regional Center BUENOS AIRES NORTE

Thematic Coordination of Animal Health

Office NAVARRO, Foot and Mouth Disease Vaccination Campaigns carried out:
www.senasa.gov.ar

Thanks for your 

attention
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-33487 and 333-105833) of Barrett Business Services, Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2007 relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Barrett Business Services Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

 

 

 

/s/ Moss Adams LLP

 

Portland, OR

March 16, 2007
#### FORD FOR USE OF PATTERSON *v.*HAFT, COLE AND LINDSAY.

Covenant on a note, signed and sealed as follows:

J. Haet, [seal.]

Cole and Lindsay, [seal.]

Plea — non est factum, without affidavit.

*J. Collier,*for the plaintiff,

offered to read the note in evidence.

*R. Marsh,*objected, a variance.

The *declaration*describes the note as sealed with the seals of H. C. & L. by the name and style of C.&L.; the note shows Haft’s seal, and Cole and Lindsay’s *seal.*

By the Court.

There is no affidavit to the plea, and if the note is substantially described, it may be read. Though Cole and Lindsay cannot have a *common*seal, yet each may have used the same seal, and made it his. The note may go in evidence; but whether unexplained, it will avail the plaintiff, is another question.

The note was then read. A witness was called, who proved the signature of Cole and Lindsay to be the writing of Cole, and his act alone.

The plaintiff rested. The defendant moved for a non suit.

By the Court. The plaintiff cannot recover. He has sued three upon an obligation of two.

Non suit ordered. *See Button £f Freeman*v. *Hampson et al. Ante*94.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PUSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respect the financial condition and results of operations of Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.   Date:  March 17, 2010 By: _/s/ James R. Musick______________ Name:  James R. Musick Title: President, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT 
OF INCOME AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET. THIS INFORMATION IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000796370
<NAME> UNITED ASSET MANAGEMENT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         194,474
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  151,794
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               360,563
<PP&E>                                          71,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,897
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,414,753<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          210,876
<BONDS>                                        641,043<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           692
<OTHER-SE>                                     524,345
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,414,753
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               634,805
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  415,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                77,654<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,754
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                111,013
<INCOME-TAX>                                    47,644
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,369
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,369
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .88
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES $959,747,000 OF COST ASSIGNED TO CONTRACTS ACQUIRED, NET.
<F2>INCLUDES $150,000,000 IN SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND 491,043,000 IN SUBORDINATED
NOTES PAYABLE.
<F3>REPRESENTS AMORTIZATION OF COST ASSIGNED TO CONTRACTS ACQUIRED FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
-  You are here:  EPA Home 
        - Envirofacts

HomeMultisystem SearchTopic Searches                    |                    System Data Searches                    |                    About the Data                    |                    Data Downloads                    | Widgets |                    Services                    |                    Mobile                    |                    Other Datasets
**The 2023 Toxics Release Inventory preliminary dataset is now available in the Envirofacts TRI queries found below. Learn more on the TRI website.**

**The Envirofacts database is now RESTful                          service-enabled.                        See the services tab below for documentation and                        examples, or visit:                        Envirofacts Web ServicesContact UsEnvirofacts ModelData UpdateGet the EnviroFACTS!
                            Retrieve information from multiple sources of                            Envirofacts’ System Data for your area of interest.                          
                            Enter a location such as address, zip, city, county,                            waterbody, park name, etc.                            AdvancedTopic SearchesAirWasteFacilityLandToxicsComplianceWaterRadiationOtherEnvirofacts System Data Searches
BRBrownfields-CleanupsCleanupsECHO/IDEAICIS-AIRICIS-NPDES
FRSEZ SearchOrganization SearchGreenhouse GasQuery Builder (formerly Customized Search)ICR
Locational InformationLocational SearchNEINGGS
RadNetQuery Builder (formerly Customized Search)RCRAInfoRMPSDWISSEMSSRSUV Index
                              TRI                              TRI ExplorerTRI SearchForm R SearchForm R & A DownloadEZ SearchCustomized SearchPollution PreventionOther Sites of Interest
Geospatial                                 Download                              

EnviroMapper

MyEnvironment

MyPropertyDiscover.-  Accessibility StatementBudget & PerformanceContractingEPA www Web SnapshotGrantsNo FEAR Act DataPlain WritingPrivacyPrivacy and Security NoticeConnect.-  Data.govInspector GeneralJobsNewsroomOpen GovernmentRegulations.govSubscribeUSA.gov
White HouseAsk.-  Contact EPAEPA DisclaimersHotlinesFOIA RequestsFrequent QuestionsFollow.-   
-   
-   
-   
-**
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STEVE SALVATIORE BRANA
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 2717

[ June 15, 2023 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nine teenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Sherwood Bauer, Jr.

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 431997CF001 32 4C

.

Leah H. Mayersohn of Mayersohn Law Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

P ER C URIA M

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, G ERBER and L EVINE
, JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12** 
**- 1773** 

ERIC M. MCMILLIAN ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
and
THE U.S. COURTS, JAILS AND PRISONS COALITION, c/o Eric M. McMillian 4811

- D Blue Bird Court Raleigh, NC 27606,

Plaintiff,

v.

RALEIGH CITY COUNCIL; G.C. LECONEY ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever , III, Chief District Judge. ( 5:12

- cv
- 00101

- D )

Submitted : November 2 , 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012

Before WILKINSON , KEENAN , and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Eric M. McMillian, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Eric M. McMillian appeal s the district court ’ s order
dismissing the civil action filed by McMillian on behalf of his
organization for failure to pay the filing fee. On appeal, we
confine our review to the issues raised in the Ap pellant’s

brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because McMillian’s informal
brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s
disposition, McMillian ha s forfeited appellate review of the
court’s order. Accordingly , we grant leave to proceed on appeal
in forma pauperis and affirm the district court ’ s judgment . We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-127580 and 333-94121 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-139581 on Form S-3ASR of our report dated February 27, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financialstatement schedules of Post Properties, Inc. and Post Apartment Homes, L.P. and the effectiveness of Post Properties, Inc.’s and Post Apartment Home, L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form10-K of Post Properties, Inc. and Post Apartment Homes. L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

February 27, 2009
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.35 Conduct of hearings. ( a ) *General rules.* ( 1 ) *Conduct of hearings.* Hearings must be conducted so as to provide a fair and expeditious presentation of the relevant disputed issues. Each party has the right to present its case or defense by oral and documentary evidence and to conduct such cross examination as may be required for full disclosure of the facts.
( 2 ) *Order of hearing.* Enforcement Counsel will present its case-in-chief first, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ, or unless otherwise expressly specified by law or regulation. Enforcement Counsel will be the first party to present an opening statement and a closing statement and may make a rebuttal statement after the respondent's closing statement. If there are multiple respondents, respondents may agree among themselves as to their order of presentation of their cases, but if they do not agree, the ALJ will fix the order.
( 3 ) *Examination of witnesses.* Only one counsel for each party may conduct an examination of a witness, except that in the case of extensive direct examination, the ALJ may permit more than one counsel for the party presenting the witness to conduct the examination. A party may have one counsel conduct the direct examination and another counsel conduct re-direct examination of a witness, or may have one counsel conduct the cross examination of a witness and another counsel conduct the re-cross examination of a witness.
( 4 ) *Stipulations.* Unless the ALJ directs otherwise, all stipulations of fact and law previously agreed upon by the parties, and all documents, the admissibility of which have been previously stipulated, will be admitted into evidence upon commencement of the hearing.
( b ) *Transcript.* The hearing must be recorded and transcribed. The reporter will make the transcript available to any party upon payment by that party to the reporter of the cost of the transcript. The ALJ may order the record corrected, either upon motion to correct, upon stipulation of the parties, or following notice to the parties upon the ALJ's own motion.
( c ) *Electronic presentation.* Based on the circumstances of each hearing, the ALJ may direct the use of, or any party may use, an electronic presentation during the hearing. If the ALJ requires an electronic presentation during the hearing, each party will be responsible for their own presentation and related costs, unless the parties agree to another manner in which to allocate presentation responsibilities and costs.
§ 111.110 Motor vehicle driving record request. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, no reviewing entity may permit an individual to begin service as a pilot unless the reviewing entity has requested and evaluated all relevant information identified through a National Driver Register (NDR) search set forth in chapter 303 of Title 49 concerning the individual's motor vehicle driving history in accordance with the following: ( 1 ) The reviewing entity must obtain the written consent of that individual, in accordance with § 111.310, before requesting an NDR search for the individual's State motor vehicle driving records;
( 2 ) After obtaining the written consent of the individual, the reviewing entity must submit a request to the NDR to determine whether any State maintains relevant records pertaining to that individual; and
( 3 ) When the NDR search result is returned, if the NDR search result indicates that records exist concerning that individual, the reviewing entity must submit a request for the relevant motor vehicle driving records to each chief driver licensing official of each State identified in the NDR search result.
( b ) Each reviewing entity must document in the PRD that the reviewing entity complied with this section, as prescribed at § 111.240.
( c ) Upon the Administrator's request, each reviewing entity must provide documentation showing the reviewing entity has conducted the search required by paragraph (a). The reviewing entity must retain this documentation for five years.
( d ) This section does not apply to operators described in § 111.100(a)(2) through (3).
§ 608.823 Right to review of claim. ( a ) If the debtor disputes the claim, the debtor may request a review of the FCA's determination of the existence of the debt, the amount of the debt, the propriety of collecting the debt by offset, and in the case of salary offset, the propriety of the proposed repayment schedule. If only part of the claim is disputed, the undisputed portion should be paid by the payment due date.
( b ) To obtain a review, the debtor shall submit a written request for review to the FCA official named in the Notice of Intent to Collect by Administrative [or Salary] Offset within 15 calendar days after receipt of the notice. The debtor's written request for review shall state the basis on which the claim is disputed and shall specify whether the debtor requests an oral hearing or a review of the written record of the claim. If an oral hearing is requested, the debtor shall explain in the request why the matter cannot be resolved by a review of the documentary evidence alone.
( c ) The FCA shall promptly notify the debtor, in writing, that the FCA has received the request for review. The FCA shall conduct its review of the claim in accordance with § 608.810.
( d ) The FCA's review of the claim, under this section, shall include providing the debtor with a reasonable opportunity for an oral hearing if: ( 1 ) An applicable statute authorizes or requires the FCA to consider waiver of the indebtedness, the debtor requests waiver of the indebtedness, and the waiver determination turns on an issue of credibility or veracity; or
( 2 ) The debtor requests reconsideration of the debt and the FCA determines that the question of the indebtedness cannot be resolved by reviewing the documentary evidence; for example, when the validity of the debt turns on an issue of credibility or veracity.
( e ) A debtor waives the right to a hearing and will have his or her debt offset in accordance with the proposed offset schedule if the debtor: ( 1 ) Fails to file a written request for review within the timeframe set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, unless the FCA determines that the delay was the result of circumstances beyond his or her control; or
( 2 ) Fails to appear at an oral hearing of which he or she was notified unless the hearing official determines that the failure to appear was due to circumstances beyond the employee's control.
( f ) Upon completion of its review of the claim, the FCA shall notify the debtor whether the FCA's determination of the existence or amount of the debt has been sustained, amended, or canceled. The notification shall include a copy of the written decision issued by the hearing official, pursuant to § 608.810(e). If the FCA's determination is sustained, this notification shall contain a provision which states that the FCA intends to collect the debt by offset or by requesting other Federal agencies for assistance in collecting the debt.
( g ) When the procedural requirements of this section have been provided to the debtor in connection with the same debt or under some other statutory or regulatory authority, the FCA is not required to duplicate those requirements before effecting offset.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 17, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 17, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0211. RICO MARTINEZ PEARSON et al. v. GEORGIA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2016CV276094