alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 111.100 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart prescribes requirements for the following reviewing entities: ( 1 ) Each operator that holds an air carrier or operating certificate issued by the Administrator in accordance with part 119 of this chapter and is authorized to conduct operations under part 121, part 125, or part 135 of this chapter.
( 2 ) Each operator that holds management specifications to operate in accordance with subpart K of part 91 of this chapter.
( 3 ) Each operator that holds a letter of authorization to conduct air tour operations in accordance with § 91.147 of this chapter.
( b ) If an operator described in § 111.1(b)(4) or an entity described in § 111.1(b)(5) accesses the PRD to review records in accordance with this subpart, the operator or entity must comply with § 111.120.
[86 FR 31060, June 10, 2021, as amended at 86 FR 31067, June 10, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,062
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,779
<ALLOWANCES>                                       369
<INVENTORY>                                     50,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               174,502
<PP&E>                                          63,022
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,136
<BONDS>                                         47,070
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         80
<COMMON>                                         3,847
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   251,791
<SALES>                                        192,339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,339
<CGS>                                          138,773
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,241
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,186
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,307
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,879
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,783
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

INFORMATIVE MOTION

To the Honorable United States District Court Judge Laura Taylor Swain: 

Now Come, ICPR Junior College (Claim 5130), hereinafter referred to as “ICPR”, who 

claims rent due by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, herein represented by its undersigned 

attorney and states, and prays as follows:

1. In compliance with the January 13, 2023, Order Regarding Procedures for Hearing 

on February 1-2, 2023, Omnibus Hearing, ICPR submits its Party Exhibit Cover Sheet. Copies of 

the five (5) exhibits identified in the Cover Sheet are included with this motion.

WHEREFORE, in view of the above, it is respectfully requested that this Honorable Court 

accept the above stated information as in compliance with the January 13, Order.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this same date I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send notification of such filing to the 

participants appearing in said record. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, in San Juan, Puerto Rico, on January 24, 2023. 

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

As representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23313 Filed:01/24/23 Entered:01/24/23 12:10:09 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

s/ JAIME BRUGUERAS

USDC 120809

MUÑOZ BENITEZ BRUGUERAS & CRUZ

P.O. Box 191979

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00919-1979

Tel. (787) 751-9040

Fax (787) 751-0910

jbrugue@mbbclawyers.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23313 Filed:01/24/23 Entered:01/24/23 12:10:09 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### STRONG *v.*WATROUS.

Rescisión of a contract — articles tendered — goods sold.

Upon a contract to pay for land in specific articles, and the balance in cash, a tender of the articles is equivalent to a delivery; and if the vender of the land *rescind*the contract by conveying to another, the articles tendered may be sued for as goods sold.

The rescisión of the contract under such circumstances,-does not throw the property in the articles upon the purchaser, unless at his option.

Error to the Common Pleas. The suit below was assumpsit for work, goods sold, and money. Plea non assumpsit, with' notice of setoff.

On trial the plaintiff below proved that the defendant sold him land, for which he was to pay a clock, a wagon, and the balance in *374money. The clock and wagon were delivered, and deemed equal to the price of the land, but it was left to G. B. and E. B. to appraise. They did so, but it did not appear the defendant had notice, or that the wagon was before them. The defendant afterwards tendered the balance, which was refused, and the defendant sold the land to another. There was no evidence of a demand of the clock and wagon after the tender, or that the defendant had sold them.

Upon this evidence, the plaintiff asked the court to charge the jury, that if the contract for land had been rescinded by the defendant’s refusal to complete it, it was likewise rescinded as to the delivery of the clock and wagon, and they remained in the defendant’s hands, without reference to the contract, and their value could not be recovered in this suit, as goods sold. The court refused the instructions asked for, but did instruct the jury, that if the contract was rescinded, the plaintiff might recover for the property delivered on the contract. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The above matters being set out in a bill of exceptions, it is assigned for error, that the court erred in refusing, and in giving, the charge to the jury.

*Giddings*and *Wade,*for the plaintiff in error.

Lane, J.

We concur in opinion with the Common Pleas, *both*as to the charge given, and that refused. The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
#### § 101.19 Rapid deflation device.

No person may operate a moored balloon unless it has a device that will automatically and rapidly deflate the balloon if it escapes from its moorings. If the device does not function properly, the operator shall immediately notify the nearest ATC facility of the location and time of the escape and the estimated flight path of the balloon.
Opinion filed June 5, 2015

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-15-00100-CV

__________

CLEVELAND THOMAS AND $832.82 U.S. CURRENCY, 

Appellants

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 39th District Court

Haskell County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11,891

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Cleveland Thomas filed an untimely notice of appeal. On April 30, 2015, the 

clerk of this court notified Thomas that his notice of appeal was not timely filed, and 

we requested that Thomas respond and show grounds to continue the appeal. We 

informed Thomas that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction. 
2

Thomas filed a response as requested but has not shown grounds upon which this 

court can continue the appeal.1

The documents on file in this case show that, on November 13, 2014, the trial 

court signed the forfeiture judgment from which Thomas appeals. The notice of 

appeal was due to be filed on or before December 15, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.1. Thomas’s notice of appeal was filed in the trial court on April 15, 2015—153

days after the judgment was signed and well after the deadline for filing a notice of 

appeal or a motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.3. Absent a timely notice of appeal, this court is without jurisdiction to 

consider this appeal. See Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys., 160 S.W.3d 559, 

564 (Tex. 2005); Garza v. Hibernia Nat’l Bank, 227 S.W.3d 233 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.); see also Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 

617 (Tex. 1997). Because we are without jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

June 5, 2015

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.

 

1

In his response, Thomas asks this court to allow him “the time needed.” However, this court is 

not permitted to “alter the time for perfecting an appeal in a civil case.” TEX. R. APP. P. 2. We also note 

that courts “may not enlarge the period for taking any action under the rules relating to new trials except as 

stated in these rules.” TEX. R. CIV. P. 5.
#### JOHN DUNLAP *v.*ELIZA DUNLAP.

Divorce — adultery—naming the person — the proof must conform to the allegations.

The petition for divorce for adultery, must set forth the name of the person with whom committed, if known, or the excuse, if unknown; the proof must conform to the allegations.

Divorce. The bill charged adultery, with one McGrew and others, as the ground of the application. It was proved, that the defendant was intemperate. No evidence was offered of the adultery with McGrew, but evidence was offered of adultery with other persons.

By the Court.

The decisions have been uniform, that you must allege in the bill, the person with whom the offence of adultery was committed, if known, and if unknown, the want of knowledge must be set forth as an excuse for omitting the name. The proof must conform to the allegations.

Leave was given to amend, and the cause was continued.
**Exhibit 23.3****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements ofPost Properties, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2006, except with respect to our opinion on theconsolidated financial statements insofar as it relates to the effects of the discontinuedoperations discussed in Note 2, as to which the date isDecember 8, 2006, and insofar as it relates to the effects ofchanges in segment reporting categories discussed in Note 15, asto which date is February 28, 2007, relating to the financialstatements and the summary of activity for the real estateinvestments and accumulated depreciation included in the financialstatement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K.Form S-3 (No. 33-81772)
### In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06

- 11

- 00 132

- CV

______________________________

CALVIN MONASCO , Appellant

V.

GILMER BOATING AND FISHING CLUB , Appellee

On Appeal from the 115th Judicial District Court

Upshur County, Texas

Trial Court No. 748

- 07

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Calvin Monasco has filed a notice of appeal against a judgment of contempt entered

against him by the 115th Judicial District Court of Upshur County. Generally, only final

decisions of trial courts are appealable. Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp ., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex.

200 1); Hinde v. Hinde , 701 S.W.2d 637, 639 (Tex. 1985); N.E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge , 400

S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966 ) ; see T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN . § 51.012 (West Supp.

2011) (final judgment of district and county courts). The Legislature has also authorized the

appeal of a number of interlocutory orders, not including orders of contempt. See

, e.g.

, T EX

. C IV

.

P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 51.014 ( West Supp. 2011).

An order holding a person in contempt is not one from which an appeal may be brought.

Ex parte Cardwell , 416 S.W.2d 382, 384 (Tex. 1967) ; Pandozy v. Beaty , 254 S.W.3d 613 , 616

(Tex. App.

— Texarkana 2008, no pet.) (citing Ex parte Williams , 690 S.W.2d 243 (Tex. 1985))

.

Relief is available only throug h application for a writ of habeas corpus. Grimes v. Grimes , 706

S.W.2d 340, 343 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1986, writ dism ’ d) (citing Wagner v. Warnas c h , 259

S.W.2d 890, 893 (Tex. 1956)). We

, therefore

, may not accept jurisdiction over this appeal.

We dism iss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Jack Carter

Justice3

Date Submitted: February 16 , 2012

Date Decided: February 17 , 2012
#### SARAH LANGSTAFF *v.*JOHN LANGSTAFF.

Divorce — adultery deduced from circumstances — house of ill fame — alimony.

Where a husband is absent from home, and found before sunrise in the morning in bed in the house of a woman of ill fame, with the woman sitting upon the side of the bed with her clothes loosely thrown on, connected with the fact of their being no other bed in the room, of his frequenting the house, and staying there all night, it was held sufficient evidence of adultery.

Divorce. Cause — adultery with Jane Oliver, Sally Bingham* Hope Kimberly, and others, unknown.

It appeared in evidence, that these parties were married in Massachusetts, in 1815. That he had been frequently at houses of ill fame, and with women reputed common strumpets, and was sometimes on the bed with them. One witness testified that he went into a house, a part of which was occupied by Hope Kimberly, a woman of bad fame, early one morning before sunrise, where he found the defendant in bed, and Mrs. Kimberly sitting by the side of it, with her clothes loosely thrown on. There was no other bed in the room, and the defendant did not live there. Another witness said, that he lived near Mrs. Kimberly about three years; he had seen the defendant there almost every day, so frequently that the witness supposed he lived there. Saw him go there frequently at night, and come away early in the morning. Mrs. Kimberly has the reputation of keeping strumpets, and the defendant that of keeping her, *as his mistress.*It was proven that he had generally provided for his wife, until a year or two since, when he left her without provision, and went to work in Pittsburgh. While he was gone, she sold some of the furniture, paid some of his debts, broke up housekeeping, and has since lived separate from him, with a good reputation, earning her own living.

By the Court.

It seems that this defendant has abandoned his family and character, and taken up with the strumpet, Mrs. Kimberly; and although we have no direct or positive evidence of adultery, we have that which leaves no doubt of his guilt. His conduct *149cannot be reconciled with innocence. We decree a divorce, and that the defendant pay the complainant ‡500 for alimony, and the costs; and in default, that she have execution for the amount, with interest.
Filed 8/26/15

Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Three

- No. B248654

S217616



## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

En Banc

________________________________________________________________________

BARRON NICHOLAS HILTON, Petitioner,

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent;

THE PEOPLE et al., Real Parties in Interest.

________________________________________________________________________

The request for republication of the Court of Appeal's opinion, originally

published at 224 Cal.App.4th 47, is granted.

______________________________ Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 32.01

Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 and in connection  with the annual report on
Form 10-K of Delta and Pine Land  Company for the fiscal  year ended  August 31,
2003, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  the undersigned W. Thomas  Jagodinski,  the President and Chief
Executive  Officer,   hereby  certifies  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of D&PL.

     Signature              Title                                   Date


/s/ W. Thomas Jagodinski  President, Chief Executive Officer   November 26, 2003
------------------------  and Director
W. Thomas Jagodinski      (Principal Executive Officer)
#### §§ 794.131-794.139 [Reserved]
1

September	4,	2015

Docket	Operations,	M-30

U.S. Department	of	Transportation (DOT)

1200	New	Jersey	Avenue,	SE

Room	W12-140,	West	Building	Ground	Floor

Washington,	D.C.	20590-0001

RE:	Amendment	to	StraightEdge	Aero,	LLC	Exemption	No.	12205.

Dear	Sir or	Madam:

StraightEdge	Aero,	LLC	was	issued	an	exemption	under	Section	333	of	the	“FAA	

Modernization	and	Reform	Act	of	2012”	numbered. StraightEdge	Aero,	LLC,	hereby	

requests	an	amendment	to	our	FAA	Exemption	No. 12205,	Docket	No.	FAA-2015-

1873 to	allow	additional	UAS	to	be	operated	in	full	compliance	with	the	conditions	

set	forth	within	Exemption	No.	12205.

StraightEdge	Aero,	LLC	requests	permission	to	operate	the	following	UAS	based	on	

their	type,	size,	weight	and	speed	under	the	same	terms	and	conditions	contained	

within	Exemption	No.	12205 and	provided	by	the	parameters	set	forth	in	regards	to	

capabilities	and	limitations	identified	within	the	attached	manuals.

1. 3D	Robotics	Aero-M

2. 3D	Robotic	Iris

3. 3D	Robotics	Iris+

4. 3D	Robotics	X8

5. 3D	Robotics	X8-M

6. Altavian	Nova F6500

7. Altavian	Nova	R8400

8. DJI	Inspire

9. DJI	Inspire	1

10. DJI	Inspire	2

11. DJI	S900

12. DJI	S1000

13. Latitude	HQ-40	Hybrid	Multirotor

14. SenseFly	eBee

15. Sensurion	Magpie	MP-1

16. Trimble	UX5

Because the requested amendment would not set any precedent or otherwise raise any 

novel issue, and because the addition of these sUAS platforms to our fleet will not 

materially affect our already granted petition No. 12205 in any way, and because 

StraightEdge Aero, LLC seeks to begin these operations without delay, StraightEdge 

Aero, LLC respectfully requests the FAA to determine that good cause exists to dispense 
2

with publication of the summary of this petition in the Federal Register and grant the 

requested amendment expeditiously by summary means. 

Thank	you	for	your	time	and	consideration	with	our	request.	Feel	free	to	contact	us	

with	any	additional	questions.

Sincerely,	

/s/	Nicholas	Flom

____________________________________

Nicholas	Flom Managing	Partner,	StraightEdge	Aero,	LLC
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

p0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

138544 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138544 

 COA: 289236 

Wayne CC: 00-005802-01 

DARNELL PARHAM, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 18, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Report on activities and programs for countering proliferation and NBCterrorism : executive summary [electronic resource].**
 
2004| 2006| 2009
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.118:
Item Number:0306-A-46 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000613535
 
July 3, 2018
Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westerbeke Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 26, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gregory Haidemenos, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

      By: /s/ Gregory Haidemenos
          ----------------------
          Gregory Haidemenos
          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

September 9, 2003


<PAGE>  28
#### § 107.56 Applicability.

This subpart prescribes the requirements for issuing a remote pilot certificate with a small UAS rating.

[ Docket FAA-2015-0150, Amdt. 107-1, 81 FR 42209, June 28, 2016. Redesignated by Amdt. No. 107-7, 86 FR 4513, Jan. 15, 2021]
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.
**Title:****USDA Rural Development ...accomplishments, Colorado [electronic resource].
 
2004 | 2005 | 2007| 2008 | 2009
 
SuDoc Number:A 114.1/6:
Item Number:0034-B-06 (online)
CGP System Number:000608944
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
July 24, 2017********