alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Daniel R. Coker, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Gentherm Incorporated; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ Daniel R. Coker                
|Daniel R. Coker                    
|President & Chief Executive Officer
|May 3, 2013
§ 792.57 Special procedures: Information furnished by other agencies; medical records. ( a ) When a request for records or information from NCUA includes information furnished by other Federal agencies, the system manager responsible for action on the request shall consult with the appropriate agency prior to making a decision to disclose or refuse access to the record, but the decision whether to disclose the record shall be made in the first instance by the system manager.
( b ) Medical records may be disclosed on request to the individuals to whom they pertain unless disclosing the medical information directly to the requesting individual could have an adverse effect on the individual. Where medical information is potentially adverse to the requesting individual, the system manager responsible may advise the requesting individual that the medical records will be transmitted only to a physician designated in writing by the individual.
[54 FR 18476, May 1, 1989. Redesignated at 63 FR 14338, Mar. 25, 1998, as amended at 65 FR 63790, Oct. 25, 2000; 73 FR 56939, Oct. 1, 2008]
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-69668) pertaining to the 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 1993
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No.33-95052) pertaining to the 1993 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan of
Electroglas, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-35023)
pertaining to the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan and Stock Options Granted Pursuant
to Agreements made between Electroglas, Inc. and Certain Employees of Knights
Technology, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-28327) pertaining
to the Knights Technology, Inc. 1987 Stock Option Plan and Employment Agreements
with each of Tom Sherby, Ken Huang, Mary Korn and Ankush Oberai, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-49303) pertaining to Options Granted
Pursuant to Agreements made between Electroglas, Inc. and Certain Employees of
Techne Systems, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62139)
pertaining to the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan and the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, and the Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-82209) pertaining to the
1997 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated January 25, 2000, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Electroglas, Inc.,
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K), for the year ended December 31,
1999.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
March 20, 2000
#### Land, sheriff, *et al. v.*Jolley *et al.*

No. 8877.

October 13, 1932.

Russell, C. J.

1. The costs in a criminal prosecution are collectible of the defendant by the levy of a fi. fa. at the termination of a prosecution, if it finally results in the conviction of the defendant. Under the provisions of the Civil Code (1910), §§ 5991, 5992, the amount of each item must be '“distinctly stated in figures; and no costs, or items of costs, shall in any case be demanded by any such officer, which are not itemized and endorsed as herein provided.”

2. Where one accused of crime is convicted, but upon a subsequent trial granted is thereafter acquitted, the defendant is no longer liable for the costs.

3. The court did not err in overruling demurrers to a petition which set forth allegations substantially containing the averments of the two foregoing headnotes, and praying that fi. fas. for costs which had been issued be canceled as a cloud upon petitioner’s property, and also praying for subrogation, as set forth in the petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., absent.*

*790
      *T. G. Head*and *McClure &*McClure, for plaintiffs in error.

*B. Carter*Piitman, contra.
**Exhibit
99**
  **Financial
Measures that Supplement Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles**
  **General
Electric Capital Services, Inc. and consolidated
affiliates**
  We
sometimes use information derived from consolidated financial information but
not presented in our financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Certain of these data are
considered “non-GAAP financial measures” under SEC rules. Specifically, we have
referred to:
  ·
    net
      revenues (revenues from services less interest expense) of the Commercial
      Finance and Consumer Finance segments; and
  ·
    approximate
      delinquency rates on managed financing receivables of the Commercial
      Finance and Consumer Finance segments.
  The
reasons we use these non-GAAP financial measures and their reconciliation to
their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures follow.
  **Net
Revenues**
  We
provided reconciliations of net revenues to reported revenues for these segments
on pages 14 and 16 of the Form 10-Q. Because net revenues is a common industry
measure of margin, these disclosures enable investors to compare the results of
our businesses with results of others in the same industry.
  **Approximate
delinquency Rates on Managed Financing Receivables**
  **Commercial
Finance**
  **At****3/31/05**
    
    **12/31/04**
    
    **3/31/04**Managed
    1.54
    %
    1.40
    %
    1.38
    %Off-book
    1.05
    
    0.90
    
    1.41On-book
    1.70
    
    1.58
    
    1.37
 
  **Consumer
Finance**
  **At****3/31/05**
    
    **12/31/04**
    
    **3/31/04**Managed
    5.18
    %
    4.85
    %
    5.76
    %Off-book
    4.94
    
    5.09
    
    4.32On-book
    5.20
    
    4.84
    
    5.90
 
 We
believe that delinquency rates on managed financing receivables provide a useful
perspective of our portfolio quality and are key indicators of financial
performance. Further, investors use such information, including the results of
both the on-book and securitized portfolios, which are relevant to our overall
performance.
# Official Journal C 105A/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2009.105.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 105A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 527 May 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2009.105.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 105A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 527 May 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions |
| 2009/C 105A/01 | Notice of Open Competition: Programmer Analyst — Reference: EF/TA/09/01 | 1 |
| 2009/C 105A/02 | Notice of Open Competition: Research Manager (Human Resources Management) — Reference: EF/TA/09/07 | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

2009/C 105A/01

Notice of Open Competition: Programmer Analyst — Reference: EF/TA/09/01

1

2009/C 105A/02

Notice of Open Competition: Research Manager (Human Resources Management) — Reference: EF/TA/09/07

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2009/C 105A/03 | REVIEW OF ‘COMPETITION’ C A OJs | s3 |

2009/C 105A/03

REVIEW OF ‘COMPETITION’ C A OJs

s3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
(logo)
KPMG
Suite 2800
Two First Union Center
Charlotte, NC 28282-8290

Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors
First Union Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about First Union Mortgage Corporation's
(a  wholly-owned  subsidiary  of First Union  Corporation)  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing  standards set forth in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of
America's Uniform Single  Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of
and for the year ended December 31, 1998 included in the accompanying management
assertion.  Management is  responsible  for First Union  Mortgage  Corporation's
compliance with those minimum  servicing  standards.  Our  responsibility  is to
express  an  opinion  on  management's  assertion  about  First  Union  Mortgage
Corporation's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about First Union Mortgage  Corporation's
compliance  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  and  performing  such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our
examination  provides a reasonable  basis for our opinion.  Our examination does
not  provide  a  legal  determination  on  First  Union  Mortgage  Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion,  management's  assertion that First Union  Mortgage  Corporation
complied in all material  respects  with the  aforementioned  minimum  servicing
standards as of and for the year ended  December 31, 1998 is fairly  stated,  in
all material respects.

KPMG
March 26, 1999

(logo)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2519

ROGERS MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Hansford T. Johnson, Acting Secretary of the Navy, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-154-7-F) Submitted: January 6, 2006 Decided: January 23, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ernest J. Wright, Jacksonville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Joshua B. Royster, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Rogers Moore appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant in his action alleging claims of employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A § 2000e et seq. ; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 621 et seq. ; and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 791 et seq. We have reviewed the record and find no r eversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Department of the Navy , No. 03-CV-154 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 347.114 Extensions of credit to foreign organizations held by insured state nonmember banks; shares of foreign organizations held in connection with debts previously contracted. ( a ) *Loans or extensions of credit.* A bank that directly or indirectly holds equity interests in a foreign organization pursuant to the authority of this subpart may make loans or extensions of credit to or for the accounts of the organization without regard to the provisions of section 18(j) of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1828(j)).
( b ) *Debts previously contracted.* Equity interests acquired to prevent a loss upon a debt previously contracted in good faith are not subject to the limitations or procedures of this subpart; however, they must be disposed of promptly but in no event later than two years after their acquisition, unless the FDIC authorizes retention for a longer period.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3674 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 3674

 To amend section 5318 to prohibit the use of identification issued by 
 foreign governments, other than passports, for purposes of verifying 
     the identity of a person who opens an account at a financial 
                  institution, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2003

  Mr. Garrett of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 5318 to prohibit the use of identification issued by 
 foreign governments, other than passports, for purposes of verifying 
     the identity of a person who opens an account at a financial 
                  institution, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Financial Customer Identification 
Verification Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. FOREIGN-ISSUED FORMS OF IDENTIFICATION PROHIBITED AS PROOF OF 
              IDENTITY TO OPEN ACCOUNTS AT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.

    Section 5318(l) of title 31, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(6) Prohibition on use of identification issued by a 
        foreign government.--A financial institution may not accept any 
        form of identification that was issued by a foreign government, 
        other than a passport, for use in verifying the identity of a 
        person in connection with the opening of an account by such 
        person at the financial institution, including a matricula 
        consular issued in the United States by a duly authorized 
        consular officer of the Government of Mexico.''.
                                 <all>
```
1 The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________ No. 06-1530

________________ United States of America, Appellee,

v. Cynthia Collette Vandry, Appellant. * * * * * * * * * Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. [UNPUBLISHED]

________________ Submitted: January 11, 2007 Filed: January 29, 2007

________________ Before MURPHY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

________________ PER CURIAM. Cynthia Collette Vandry appeals the district court's 1 denial of her Rule 35(b) motion to reduce her sentence. Assuming excusable neglect exists to pardon the untimeliness of her notice of appeal, we affi rm the district court's denial of Vandry's motion. "There is no provision in Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for a motion by a defendant for a reduction based upon a claim of substantial assistance to the [G]overnment." United States v. Palmer , 297 F.3d 760,-2- 768 (8th Cir. 2002), cert. denied , 537 U.S. 1143, cert. denied , 537 U.S. 1213, and cert. denied , 538 U.S. 937 (2003). To the extent Vandry argues that the Government should have filed a Rule 35(b) motion, she has failed to make a "substantial threshold showing" that the Government's refusal to file the motion, which was left to the Government's sole discretion in the plea agreement, was based on an unconstitutional motive, and the Government’s refusal is ther efore not subject to judicial review. See United States v. Marks , 244 F.3d 971, 975 (8th Cir. 2001). The district court's judgment is affirmed. See8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, William J. McEntee, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) (Intentionally omitted)

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:

a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                        |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  | /s/    WILLIAM J. MCENTEE,
JR.                   
|                        |  | William J. McEntee, Jr.                          
|                        |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit 

__________________________ 

DONALD W. MACPHERSON, 

Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

__________________________ 

2012-7086 

__________________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in case no. 08-3660, Judge Mary J. 

Schoelen. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION 

__________________________ 

O R D E R 

Donald W. MacPherson moves without opposition for 

a 63-day extension of time to file his reply brief. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Case: 12-7086 Document: 28 Page: 1 Filed: 12/07/2012
DONALD MACPHERSON v. SHINSEKI 2

The motion is granted. Mr. MacPherson’s reply brief 

is due March 1, 2013. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk 

s27 

Case: 12-7086 Document: 28 Page: 2 Filed: 12/07/2012
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-165979) of Icagen, Inc.;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-123474) pertaining to the 1996 Amended Equity Compensation Plan and 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of Icagen, Inc., and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-145123) pertaining to the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of Icagen, Inc., as amended;
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated March 9, 2011, with respect to the financial statements of Icagen, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2010.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Raleigh, North
Carolina

March 9, 2011
October 3 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellant NO. 14 - 13 - 00758 - CR V. NO. 14 - 13 - 00759 - CR NO. 14 - 13 - 00760 - CR NO. 14 - 13 - 00761 - CR NO. 14 - 13 - 00762 - CR

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL DUPUY , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court belo w. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order the mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### § 1203.803 Ad hoc committees.

The Chairperson is authorized to establish such ad hoc panels or subcommittees as may be necessary in the conduct of the Committee's work.

[78 FR 5121, Jan. 24, 2013]
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date: 12/05/2011 11:06 AM Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule

Hi, Consistent with the EO, attached are the handouts from this meeting.

Regards,
Cortney

-----Original Appointment----- From: Echols, Mabel E. When: Friday, December 02, 2011 2:00 PM-2:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
Where: Room 10103 NEOB

This meeting was requested by Pat Quinn, The Accord Group on behalf of Southern Company.