alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Locatable Minerals

Alternative D

0 2 4 8 12 16 20

Miles

Map 61

Harlowton Roundup

T7N

 ̈¦§

Pompeys

Pillar

T Big Timber 1N

Billings

§ ̈¦

T2 Columbus S  ̈¦§

Bridger

T8S

R18E R29E Montana R103W R93W Wyoming

T

57N

Billings

Field 

Office

Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü

Locatable Withdrawals are processed by Lands

and Realty; as a result Locatable Withdrawals section

is identical to the Lands and Realty Withdrawals section.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument RMP / EIS

Legend

Map scale 1:900,000

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was

developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

Locatable Minerals Closed

Locatable Minerals Open

Interstate

Highway

^ Towns

Public Lands Survey System

94

90

90
#### § 1206.511 Other rights and services.

Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to entitle any person to any service or to the disclosure of any record that is not required under the FOIA.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

WILLIAM D. ABRAHAM,

 Appellants,

v. 

RON ACTON, DEBBIE ACTON, AARK 

INVESTMENTS LP, FEDERICO 

FERNANDEZ AND CAROL 

FERNANDEZ,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00079-CV

Appeal from the

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2016DCV2081)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellees’ second motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until March 1, 2023. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLEES’ BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT. 

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jamie T. Wall, the Appellees’ attorney, prepare the 

Appellees’ brief and forward the same to this Court on or before March 1, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of February, 2023.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of APA Optics, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anil K. Jain,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Signature: /s/ Anil K. Jain
           ----------------
Print Name: Anil K. Jain
            ------------
Print Title: Chief Executive Officer
             -----------------------


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") of PREMIER
EXHIBITIONS, INC. (the "Company") for the quarter ended May 31, 2005, the
undersigned Arnie Geller, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: July 14, 2005                  /s/ Arnie Geller
                                      ----------------
                                      Arnie Geller
                                      President, Chief Executive Officer
                                       and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 710
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 710 appear at 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 710.3 Approval of the liquidation proposal by members. ( a ) When the board of directors decides to present the question of liquidation to the members, it shall act promptly to obtain the members' approval. The members shall be given advance notice of the membership meeting at which the liquidation proposal is to be submitted. The notice shall: ( 1 ) Inform members that they have the right to vote on the liquidation proposal in person at the membership meeting called for that purpose or by written ballot to be received no later than the time and date indicated on the notice.
( 2 ) Include or be accompanied by a ballot for the liquidation proposal.
( b ) The liquidation proposal must be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Federal credit union members who vote on the proposal.
( c ) If the members do not approve the liquidation, the board of directors, or if delegated the authority, the liquidating agent, must decide within seven days whether the Federal credit union should resume operations or, if good cause exists, to resubmit the question of liquidation to the members.
( d ) If the members approve the liquidation, neither the members nor the board of directors may rescind the decision to liquidate unless the Regional Director concurs in the recision.
( e ) The Regional Director will be notified in writing of the results of the membership vote on the voluntary liquidation proposal within three days of the date of the vote.
[58 FR 35365, July 1, 1993, as amended at 72 FR 30246, May 31, 2007]
# Official Journal C 333/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 333 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 638 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 333

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 638 October 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2020/C 333/01 | Position (EU) No 10/2020 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European crowdfunding service providers for business, and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 and Directive (EU) 2019/1937Adopted by the Council on 20 July 2020 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2020/C 333/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 10/2020 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European crowdfunding service providers for business, and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 and Directive (EU) 2019/1937 | 53 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2020/C 333/01

Position (EU) No 10/2020 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European crowdfunding service providers for business, and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 and Directive (EU) 2019/1937Adopted by the Council on 20 July 2020 (
  1
  )

1

1

2020/C 333/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 10/2020 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European crowdfunding service providers for business, and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 and Directive (EU) 2019/1937

53

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.1Section 1350 CertificationsIn connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Premier Exhibitions, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended May 31, 2007, Arnie Geller, the President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, and Stephen Couture, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, each certifies, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.         Dated: July 2, 2007 /s/ Arnie Geller   Arnie Geller   President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)       Dated:  July 2, 2007 /s/ Stephen Couture   Stephen Couture   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 117.5 Fitness for duty. ( a ) Each flightcrew member must report for any flight duty period rested and prepared to perform his or her assigned duties.
( b ) No certificate holder may assign and no flightcrew member may accept assignment to a flight duty period if the flightcrew member has reported for a flight duty period too fatigued to safely perform his or her assigned duties.
( c ) No certificate holder may permit a flightcrew member to continue a flight duty period if the flightcrew member has reported him or herself too fatigued to continue the assigned flight duty period.
( d ) As part of the dispatch or flight release, as applicable, each flightcrew member must affirmatively state he or she is fit for duty prior to commencing flight.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.7(E)    
  


        February 12,
2002 



	MPC Natural Gas Funding Trust

c/o Wilmington Trust Company

1100 North Market Street

Wilmington, Delaware 19890

Attn: Corporate Trustee Administration
	

with a copy to:

U.S. Bank National Association

100 Wall Street, Suite 1600

New York, New York 10005
	Attention:	 	Edward F. Kachinski

Vice President

U.S. Bank

Corporate Trust Services







Ladies and Gentlemen: 


        Reference
is made to the proposed merger (the "Merger") of The Montana Power Company, a Montana corporation
("MPC"), into The Montana Power, L.L.C., a Montana limited liability company ("MPC LLC"), which Merger
is expected to be completed on or about the date hereof. 


        As
required by Section 5.02 of the Transition Property Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of December 22, 1998, between MPC Natural Gas Funding Trust (the  "Trust"), and MPC (such agreement,
the "Property Purchase Agreement") and by Section 6.03 of the Transition Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 22, 1998,
between the Issuer and MPC (the "Servicing Agreement"), MPC LLC hereby assumes all obligations and agrees to perform every obligation of MPC under each
of the Property Purchase Agreement and the Servicing Agreement as successor to MPC under such agreements. 



	

 	
 	
THE MONTANA POWER, L.L.C.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  PATRICK T. FLEMING      
 Name: Patrick T. Fleming

Title: V.P., General Counsel & Secretary











QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.7(E)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00116

- CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

, Appellant

v.

Maria Elena RODRIGUEZ

, Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 03294

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee, Maria Elena Rodriguez, r ecover her costs of this appeal from appellant, the City of San Antonio

SIGNED August 30, 2013.

_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10380]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. ICR-99-28]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of MOM 
Approval

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration, DOL.

ACTION: Notice of approval.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is 
announcing that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the 
Information Collection Request for the Vinyl Chloride Standard under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This document announces the OMB 
approval number and expiration date for this action.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Owen, Directorate of Policy, 
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of 
Labor, Room N-3627, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, ,D.C. 
20210, telephone (202) 693-2444.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of September 28, 
1999, (64 FR 52351-52352), the Agency announced its intent to request 
OMB to renew its current approval for the paperwork requirements 
contained in the Vinyl Chloride Standard (20 CFR 1910.1017, 1915.1017, 
and 1926.1117). Consistent with the paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501-3520), OMB has renewed its approval for the paperwork 
requirements contained in this standard, and assigned these requirement 
OMB control number 1218-0010. The approval expires February 28, 2003. 
Under 5 CFR 1320.5(b), an Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a 
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information 
(paperwork) unless the collection displays a valid control number.

Authority and Signature

    Charles N. Jeffress, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational 
Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this notice. The 
authority for this notice is the paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3506) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 6-96 (62 FR 111).

    Signed at Washington, DC on April 21, 2000.
Charles N. Jeffress,
Assistant Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 00-10380 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-M
#### Green *et al. v.*The Planters’ Bank.

The appeal bond must be in the name of all the parties against whom the judgment was rendered. If some of the parties will not join in the appeal, any one who may desire a revision of the judgment, may proceed by summon and severance on his own case alone, and exempt himself from any eventual liability for the others.

MOTION to dismiss.

Hughes, for the motion.

Hutchinson, *contra.*

Mr. Justice Prat

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a motion in the court below, made by the plaintiffs in error and others, their co-defendants, to quash a forthcoming bond for reasons assigned.

The reasons were deemed insufficient, and the motion was overruled.

From this judgment of the court below, the plaintiffs here, two out of four of the defendants below, prayed an appeal to this court which was granted, and the cause brought into this court.

A motion is now made here, to dismiss the appeal so taken: because,

The judgment in the court below, was rendered against James D. Goff, William L. Davidson, Henry Gran, and Benjamin E. Phillips: and the appeal is taken by Gran and Davidson, without summons and severance.

There can be no doubt that the appeal should be in the name of all the parties against whom the judgment was rendered. If some will not join in the appeal, any one who may desire a revision of the judgment, may prosecute his appeal. Then by summons in severance, he might proceed on his own case alone and exempt himself from any eventual liability for the others. Young *v.*Ditto, 2 J. J. Marshall, 72.

*44This we are satisfied is the law as applicable in the present case. Here the appeal is prosecuted only by two, and there is no summons and severance.

It is, therefore, irregular, and must be dismissed
Paleontological Resources

Potential Fossil 

Yield Classification

Billings & Pompeys Pillar 

National Monument Draft RMP / EIS

Map 35

US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Legend

State Border

Planning Area Boundary

PFYC

Water

Very Low Fossil Potential

Low Fossil Potential

3

Moderate Fossil Potential

Unknown Fossil Potential

High Fossil Potential

Very High Fossil Potential

Wyoming

Montana

 Wyoming

Location Map

Montana

Billings

Field 

Office

Ü

0 3 6 12 18 24 30

Map scale 1:1,350,000

Miles

Map generated by the Billings Field Office in July 2011

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau

of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data for

individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was 

developed through digital means an information may be updated without notification.
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 36

 37

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL
#### § 7.1006 Loan agreement providing for a national bank or Federal savings association share in profits, income, or earnings or for stock warrants.

A national bank or Federal savings association may take as consideration for a loan a share in the profit, income, or earnings from a business enterprise of a borrower. A national bank or Federal savings association also may take as consideration for a loan a stock warrant issued by a business enterprise of a borrower, provided that the bank or savings association does not exercise the warrant. The share or stock warrant may be taken in addition to, or in lieu of, interest. The borrower's obligation to repay principal, however, may not be conditioned upon the value of the profit, income, or earnings of the business enterprise or upon the value of the warrant received.

[61 FR 4862, Feb. 9, 1996, as amended at 85 FR 83728, Dec. 22, 2020]
#### KERR AND WIFE v. THE BANK OF CHILICOTHE.

Error — assignee of an insolvent — privity—equitable holders may sue in name of legal assignor —writ quashed at the costs of the attorney.

The assignee of a chose in action not negotiable, as of a judgment, may sue in the name of the assignor, and the assignment will be deemed his authority lo do so.

One becoming privy to a judgment by operation of law, sues in his own name, and avers the facts, which show his interest and right to sue.

If a writ of enor has been sued out improperly, it will be dismissed at the costs of -the attorney ordering it.

Writ of Error. *Bond*and *Leonard*showed to the court, that Kerr was an insolvent debtor, and had assigned all his effects, &c. to Patterson, the commissioner of insolvents, and produced ap order of Kerr, and one from the commissioner of insolvents, to dismiss this writ, and thereupon asked leave to have it struck from the docket.

Doziglas,

who had sued out the writ, opposed the leave, and stated that he sued it out at the instance of one Page, who had a judgment against Kerr, junior to that of the bank of Chilicothe, which he wished reversed to let in his judgment. He claimed that Page was privy in interest to the judgment, and that the commissioner of insolvents agreed that the writ might be prosecuted, if he was indemnified against the costs, which had been done.

Wright, *J.*

The judgment' reduces the subject to a debt of record; and is not transferable by assignment so as to vest the assignee with the legal right. The assignee of a chose in action, not negotiable, by virtue of his equitable interest, may *sue in the! name of the*assignor, the assignment being held authority to do so.| But where the person suing becomes privy to a judgment *by operation of*law, as an executor or heir, if he would sue, he sues in his *own*name, and by averment spreads on the record the matter which makes him privy to it, and establishes his right to sue. A judgment creditor of a fund affected by an erroneous judgment, if he be privy, should sue in his own name, and show his right to sue by averment —he has no right to sue in the name of the plaintiff.

This writ has improvidently issued, and is ordered to be dismissed at the cost of the attorney suing it out.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1998 and the consolidated 
statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 1998, and is qualified 
in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          8,672
<SECURITIES>                                   12,369         
<RECEIVABLES>                                      81
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20,526 
<PP&E>                                          6,350
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 25,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,517
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          148
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   25,942
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,000
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               19,833
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (17,155)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (17,155)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                 (17,155)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.17)
        

</TABLE>