Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 199 / Friday, October 16, 2009 / Notices 53239 

GMPCS transceivers consistent with 

treatment of similar terrestrial wireless 

devices, such as cellular phones. 

The Commission is requiring that 

applicants obtain authorization for the 

equipment by submitting an application 

and exhibits, including test data. If the 

Commission did not obtain such 

information, it would not be able to 

ascertain whether the equipment meets 

the FCC’s technical standards for 

operation in the United States. 

Furthermore, the data is required to 

ensure that the equipment will not 

cause catastrophic interference to other 

telecommunications services that may 

impact the health and safety of 

American citizens. 

OMB Control Number: 3060–1066. 

Title: Renewal of Application for 

Satellite Space and Earth Station 

Authorization. 

Form No.: FCC Form 312–R. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other for– 

profit. 

Number of Respondents/Responses: 6 

respondents; 6 responses. 

Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The 

Commission has authority for this 

information collection under Sections 

4(i), 7(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 

303(r) of the Communications Act of 

1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 

157(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r). 

Total Annual Burden: 12 hours. 

Annual Cost Burden: $2,000. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No 

impact(s). 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

In general, there is no need for 

confidentiality. 

Needs and Uses: This collection will 

be submitted to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) as an 

extension (no change in requirements) 

after this 60–day comment period has 

ended in order to obtain the full three 

year OMB clearance. 

The Commission is requesting 

continued OMB approval of the 

application titled, ‘‘Renewal of 

Application for Satellite Space and 

Earth Station Authorization (FCC Form 

312–R). The FCC Form 312–R is used by 

earth station licensees to request 

renewals of their applications. 

Currently, this application is available 

in MyIBFS. However, the Commission 

plans to develop a new Consolidated 

Licensing System (CLS) that will replace 

MyIBFS. Therefore, the FCC Form 312– 

R will be made available to the public 

in CLS instead of MyIBFS. 

This collection is used by the 

Commission staff in carrying out its 

duties concerning satellite 

communications as required by Sections 

301, 308, 309 and 310 of the 

Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 301, 

308, 309, 310. This collection is also 

used by the Commission staff in 

carrying out its duties under the World 

Trade Organization (WTO) Basic 

Telecom Agreement. 

The information collection 

requirements accounted for in this 

collection are necessary to determine 

the technical and legal qualifications of 

applicants or licensees to operate a 

station, transfer or assign a license, and 

to determine whether the authorization 

is in the public interest, convenience 

and necessity. Without such 

information, the Commission could not 

determine whether to permit 

respondents to provide 

telecommunication services in the U.S. 

Therefore, the Commission would be 

unable to fulfill its statutory 

responsibilities in accordance with the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended, and the obligations imposed 

on parties to the WTO Basic Telecom 

Agreement. 

OMB Control Number: 3060–1108. 

Title: Consummation of Assignments 

and Transfers of Control of 

Authorization. 

Form No.: Not Applicable. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved information 

collection. 

Respondents: Business or other for– 

profit. 

Number of Respondents/Responses: 

589 respondents; 589 responses. 

Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The 

Commission has authority for this 

information collection pursuant to 47 

U.S.C. 154(i) and 47 CFR Sections 1.767, 

25.119, 63.24(e)(4), 73.3540 and 

73.3541. 

Total Annual Burden: 589 hours. 

Annual Cost Burden: $118,000. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No 

impact(s). 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

In general, there is no need for 

confidentiality. 

Needs and Uses: This collection will 

be submitted to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) as an 

extension (no change in requirements) 

after this 60–day comment period has 

ended in order to obtain the full three 

year OMB clearance. 

The purpose of this information 

collection is to request continued OMB 

approval of a module in the 

International Bureau Filing System 

(‘‘MyIBFS’’) to facilitate the 

consummation of Assignments and 

Transfers of Control of Authorization. A 

consummation is a party’s notification 

to the Commission that a transaction 

(assignment or transfer of control of 

authorization) has been completed. A 

consummation is applicable to all 

international telecommunications and 

satellite services, including 

International High Frequency (IHF), 

Section 214 Applications (ITC), Satellite 

Space Stations (SAT), Submarine Cable 

Landing Licenses (SCL) and Satellite 

Earth Station (SES) licenses. 

Without this collection of 

information, the Commission would not 

have critical information such as a 

change in a controlling interest in the 

ownership of the licensee. The 

Commission would not be able to carry 

out its duties under the 

Communications Act and to determine 

the qualifications of applicants to 

provide international 

telecommunications service, including 

applicants that are affiliated with 

foreign entities, and to determine 

whether and under what conditions the 

authorizations are in the public interest, 

convenience, and necessity. 

Furthermore, without this collection of 

information, the Commission would not 

be able to maintain effective oversight of 

U.S. providers of international 

telecommunications services that are 

affiliated with, or involved in certain 

co–marketing or similar arrangements 

with, foreign entities that have market 

power. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

William F. Caton, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–24856 Filed 10–15–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–S 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collections Being Reviewed by the 

Federal Communications Commission, 

Comments Requested 

October 9, 2009. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. An 

agency may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
53240 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 199 / Friday, October 16, 2009 / Notices 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

DATES: Persons wishing to comments on 

this information collection should 

submit comments on December 15, 

2009. If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), via fax 

at (202) 395–5167, or via the Internet at 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and 

to Cathy Williams, Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC), 

445 12th Street, SW, Room 1–C823, 

Washington, DC 20554. To submit your 

comments by e–mail send then to: 

PRA@fcc.gov and to 

Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information about the 

information collections send an e–mail 

to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Cathy 

Williams on (202) 418–2918. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–1067. 

Title: Qualification Questions. 

Form No.: FCC Form 312–EZ. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved information 

collection. 

Respondents: Business or other for– 

profit. 

Number of Respondents/Responses: 

3,872 respondents; 3,872 responses. 

Estimated Time Per Response: 10 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: One time and 

on occasion reporting requirements; 

Recordkeeping requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The 

Commission has authority for this 

information collection under Sections 

4(i), 7(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 

303(r) of the Communications Act of 

1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 

157(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r). 

Total Annual Burden: 38,720 hours. 

Annual Cost Burden: $9,874,000. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No 

impact(s). 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

In general, there is no need for 

confidentiality. 

Needs and Uses: This collection will 

be submitted to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) as an 

extension (no change in requirements) 

after this 60–day comment period has 

ended in order to obtain the full three 

year OMB clearance. 

The Federal Communications 

Commission (’’Commission’’) is 

requesting continued OMB approval of 

the application, ’’Qualification 

Questions’’ (FCC Form 312–EZ) used by 

applicants for C–band and Ku–band 

earth stations (non–common carrier 

applicants) that are eligible for the 

’’auto–grant’’ procedure. Under the 

’’autogrant process,’’ the International 

Bureau automatically grants ’’routine’’ 

earth station applications proposing to 

use the C–band or Ku–band. By 

’’routine,’’ we mean consistent with all 

the technical requirements in part 25 

applicable to earth stations. 

This collection is used by the 

Commission staff in carrying out its 

duties concerning satellite 

communications as required by Sections 

301, 308, 309 and 310 of the 

Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 301, 

308, 309, 310. This collection is also 

used by the Commission staff in 

carrying out its duties under the World 

Trade Organization (WTO) Basic 

Telecom Agreement. 

The information collection 

requirements accounted for in this 

collection are necessary to determine 

the technical and legal qualifications of 

applicants or licensees to operate a 

station, transfer or assign a license, and 

to determine whether the authorization 

is in the public interest, convenience 

and necessity. Without such 

information, the Commission could not 

determine whether to permit 

respondents to provide 

telecommunication services in the U.S. 

Therefore, the Commission would be 

unable to fulfill its statutory 

responsibilities in accordance with the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended, and the obligations imposed 

on parties to the WTO Basic Telecom 

Agreement. 

OMB Control Number: 3060–1097. 

Title: Service Rules and Policies for 

the Broadcasting Satellite Service (BSS). 

Form No.: Not Applicable. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

currently approved information 

collection. 

Respondents: Business or other for 

profit. 

Number of Respondents/Responses: 4 

respondents; 4 responses. 

Estimated Time Per Response: 10 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion, 

quarterly and annual reporting 

requirements. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The 

Commission has authority for this 

information collection under Sections 

4(i), 7(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 

303(r) of the Communications Act of 

1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 

157(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r). 

Total Annual Burden: 240 hours. 

Annual Cost Burden: $12,452,000. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No 

impact(s). 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

In general, there is no need for 

confidentiality. 

Needs and Uses: The purpose of this 

information collection is to request 

continued 

OMB approval of the processing and 

service rules for the 17/24 GHz 

Broadcasting Satellite Service (‘‘17/24 

GHz BSS’’). This collection will be 

submitted to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) as a revision after 

this 60–day comment period has ended 

in order to obtain the full three–year 

OMB clearance. The Commission is 

revising this information collection to 

reflect more accurate burden estimates. 

This collection is used by the 

Commission staff in carrying out its 

duties concerning broadcasting satellite 

service as required by Sections 301, 308, 

309 and 310 of the Communications 

Act, 47 U.S.C. 301, 308, 309, 310. This 

collection is also used by the 

Commission staff in carrying out its 

duties under the World Trade 

Organization (WTO) Basic Telecom 

Agreement. 

The information collection 

requirements accounted for in this 

collection are necessary to determine 

the technical, legal and financial 

qualifications of applicants or licensees 

to operate a station, transfer or assign a 

license, and to determine whether the 

authorization is in the public interest, 

convenience and necessity. Without 

such information, the Commission 

could not determine whether to permit 

respondents to provide 

telecommunication services in the U.S. 

Therefore, the Commission would be 

unable to fulfill its statutory 

responsibilities in accordance with the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 199 / Friday, October 16, 2009 / Notices 53241 

amended, and the obligations imposed 

on parties to the WTO Basic Telecom 

Agreement. 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0692. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Title: Sections 76.613 and 76.802, 

Home Wiring Provisions. 

Form Number: Not Applicable. 

Respondents: Individuals or 

households; Business or other for–profit 

entities. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 22,000 respondents; 253,010 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 5 

minutes – 2 hours. 

Frequency of Response: 

Recordkeeping requirement; on 

occasion reporting requirement; annual 

reporting requirement; third party 

disclosure requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The 

Commission has authority for this 

information collection under Sections 1, 

4, 224, 251, 303, 601, 623, 624 and 632 

of the Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended. 

Total Annual Burden: 36,114 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: None. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No 

impact(s). 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality with 

this collection of information. 

Needs and Uses: 47 CFR 76.613(d) 

requires that when Multichannel Video 

Programming Distributors (MVPDs) 

cause harmful signal interference 

MVPDs will be required by the 

Commission’s engineer in charge (EIC) 

to prepare and submit a report regarding 

the cause(s) of the interference, 

corrective measures planned or taken, 

and the efficacy of the remedial 

measures. 

47 CFR 76.802(b) states during the 

initial telephone call in which a 

subscriber contacts a cable operator to 

voluntarily terminate cable service, the 

cable operator–if it owns and intends to 

remove the home wiring–must inform 

the subscriber: (1) That the cable 

operator owns the home wiring; (2) That 

the cable operator intends to remove the 

home wiring; (3) That the subscriber has 

the right to purchase the home wiring; 

and (4) What the per–foot replacement 

cost and total charge for the wiring 

would be (the total charge may be based 

on either the actual length of cable 

wiring and the actual number of passive 

splitters on the customer’s side of the 

demarcation point, or a reasonable 

approximation thereof; in either event, 

the information necessary for 

calculating the total charge must be 

available for use during the initial 

phone call). 

47 CFR 76.804 (a)(1) states where an 

MVPD owns the home run wiring in an 

Multiple Dwelling Unit Building (MDU) 

and does not (or will not at the 

conclusion of the notice period) have a 

legally enforceable right to remain on 

the premises against the wishes of the 

MDU owner, the MDU owner may give 

the MVPD a minimum of 90 days’ 

written notice that its access to the 

entire building will be terminated to 

invoke the procedures in this section. 

The MVPD will then have 30 days to 

notify the MDU owner in writing of its 

election for all the home run wiring 

inside the MDU building: to remove the 

wiring and restore the MDU building 

consistent with state law within 30 days 

of the end of the 90–day notice period 

or within 30 days of actual service 

termination, whichever occurs first; to 

abandon and not disable the wiring at 

the end of the 90–day notice period; or 

to sell the wiring to the MDU building 

owner. If the incumbent provider elects 

to remove or abandon the wiring, and it 

intends to terminate service before the 

end of the 90–day notice period, the 

incumbent provider shall notify the 

MDU owner at the time of this election 

of the date on which it intends to 

terminate service. If the incumbent 

provider elects to remove its wiring and 

restore the building consistent with 

state law, it must do so within 30 days 

of the end of the 90–day notice period 

or within 30 days of actual service 

termination, which ever occurs first. For 

purposes of abandonment, passive 

devices, including splitters, shall be 

considered part of the home run wiring. 

The incumbent provider that has elected 

to abandon its home run wiring may 

remove its amplifiers or other active 

devices used in the wiring if an 

equivalent replacement can easily be 

reattached. In addition, an incumbent 

provider removing any active elements 

shall comply with the notice 

requirements and other rules regarding 

the removal of home run wiring. If the 

MDU owner declines to purchase the 

home run wiring, the MDU owner may 

permit an alternative provider that has 

been authorized to provide service to 

the MDU to negotiate to purchase the 

wiring. 

47 CFR 76.804 (a)(2) states if the 

incumbent provider elects to sell the 

home run wiring under paragraph (a)(1) 

of this section, the incumbent and the 

MDU owner or alternative provider 

shall have 30 days from the date of 

election to negotiate a price. If the 

parties are unable to agree on a price 

within that 30–day time period, the 

incumbent must elect: to abandon 

without disabling the wiring; to remove 

the wiring and restore the MDU 

consistent with state law; or to submit 

the price determination to binding 

arbitration by an independent expert. If 

the incumbent provider chooses to 

abandon or remove its wiring, it must 

notify the MDU owner at the time of this 

election if and when it intends to 

terminate service before the end of the 

90–day notice period. If the incumbent 

service provider elects to abandon its 

wiring at this point, the abandonment 

shall become effective at the end of the 

90–day notice period or upon service 

termination, whichever occurs first. If 

the incumbent elects at this point to 

remove its wiring and restore the 

building consistent with state law, it 

must do so within 30 days of the end 

of the 90–day notice period or within 30 

days of actual service termination, 

which ever occurs first. 

47 CFR 76.804 (a) (3) states if the 

incumbent elects to submit to binding 

arbitration, the parties shall have seven 

days to agree on an independent expert 

or to each designate an expert who will 

pick a third expert within an additional 

seven days. The independent expert 

chosen will be required to assess a 

reasonable price for the home run 

wiring by the end of the 90–day notice 

period. If the incumbent elects to submit 

the matter to binding arbitration and the 

MDU owner (or the alternative provider) 

refuses to participate, the incumbent 

shall have no further obligations under 

the Commission’s home run wiring 

disposition procedures. If the 

incumbent fails to comply with any of 

the deadlines established herein, it shall 

be deemed to have elected to abandon 

its home run wiring at the end of the 

90–day notice period. 

47 CFR 76.804 (a) (4) states the MDU 

owner shall be permitted to exercise the 

rights of individual subscribers under 

this subsection for purposes of the 

disposition of the cable home wiring 

under §76.802. When an MDU owner 

notifies an incumbent provider under 

this section that the incumbent 

provider’s access to the entire building 

will be terminated and that the MDU 

owner seeks to use the home run wiring 

for another service, the incumbent 

provider shall, in accordance with our 

current home wiring rules: offer to sell 

to the MDU owner any home wiring 

within the individual dwelling units 

that the incumbent provider owns and 

intends to remove; and provide the 

MDU owner with the total per–foot 

replacement cost of such home wiring. 

This information must be provided to 

the MDU owner within 30 days of the 

initial notice that the incumbent’s 

access to the building will be 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
53242 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 199 / Friday, October 16, 2009 / Notices 

terminated. If the MDU owner declines 

to purchase the cable home wiring, the 

MDU owner may allow the alternative 

provider to purchase the home wiring 

upon service termination under the 

terms and conditions of §76.802. If the 

MDU owner or the alternative provider 

elects to purchase the home wiring 

under these rules, it must so notify the 

incumbent MVPD provider not later 

than 30 days before the incumbent’s 

termination of access to the building 

will become effective. If the MDU owner 

and the alternative provider fail to elect 

to purchase the home wiring, the 

incumbent provider must then remove 

the cable home wiring, under normal 

operating conditions, within 30 days of 

actual service termination, or make no 

subsequent attempt to remove it or to 

restrict its use. 

In the Telecommunications Act of 

1996, Congress directed that every 

broadcaster be given a second channel 

for digital operations. At the end of the 

transition, broadcasters’ analog channels 

will be returned to the government. 

Congress set a target date of December 

31, 2006 for the end of the transition, 

although that date can be extended if 

85% of viewers in a particular market 

do not have access to the digital signals. 

In addition, at the end of the transition 

the broadcast spectrum will contract 

from channels 2–69 to channels 2–51. 

This 108 MHz of spectrum (channels 

52–69) can then be used by advanced 

wireless services and public safety 

authorities. There are several key 

building blocks to a successful 

transition. First, content – consumers 

must perceive something significantly 

different than what they have in analog. 

Second, distribution – the content must 

be delivered to consumers in a simple 

and convenient way. Third, equipment 

– equipment must be capable, affordable 

and consumer–friendly. And fourth, 

education – consumers must be 

educated about what digital television 

is, and what it can do for them. These 

information requests are designed to 

gather data in these key areas. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

William F. Caton, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–24868 Filed 10–15–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE: 6712–01–S 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION 

Sunshine Act; Notice of Agency 

Meeting 

Pursuant to the provisions of the 

‘‘Government in the Sunshine Act’’ (5 

U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that 

the Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation’s Board of Directors will 

meet in open session at 10 a.m. on 

Tuesday, October 20, 2009, to consider 

the following matters: 

Summary Agenda: No substantive 

discussion of the following items is 

anticipated. These matters will be 

resolved with a single vote unless a 

member of the Board of Directors 

requests that an item be moved to the 

discussion agenda. 

Disposition of minutes of previous 

Board of Directors’ Meetings. 

Summary reports, status reports, reports 

of the Office of Inspector General, and 

reports of actions taken pursuant to 

authority delegated by the Board of 

Directors. 

Memorandum and resolution re: 

Interagency Final Model Privacy Form 

under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. 

Memorandum and resolution re: 

Authorization to Publish Privacy Act 

System of Records Notices in the 

Federal Register. 

Memorandum and resolution re: 

Proposed Mid-Year Increase in 2009 

Corporate Operating Budget. 

Discussion Agenda 

Memorandum and resolution re: 

Temporary Liquidity Guarantee 

Program Final Rule. 

The meeting will be held in the Board 

Room on the sixth floor of the FDIC 

Building located at 550 17th Street, 

NW., Washington, DC. 

This Board meeting will be Webcast 

live via the Internet and subsequently 

made available on-demand 

approximately one week after the event. 

Visit http://www.vodium.com/goto/fdic/ 

boardmeetings.asp to view the event. If 

you need any technical assistance, 

please visit our Video Help page at: 

http://www.fdic.gov/video.html. 

The FDIC will provide attendees with 

auxiliary aids (e.g., sign language 

interpretation) required for this meeting. 

Those attendees needing such assistance 

should call (703) 562–6067 (Voice or 

TTY), to make necessary arrangements. 

Requests for further information 

concerning the meeting may be directed 

to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive 

Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 

898–7043. 

Dated: October 13, 2009. 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

Robert E. Feldman, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–25029 Filed 10–14–09; 11:15 

am] 

BILLING CODE P 

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS 

AUTHORITY 

Membership of the Federal Labor 

Relations Authority’s Senior Executive 

Service Performance Review Board 

AGENCY: Federal Labor Relations 

Authority. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the 

members of the Performance Review 

Board. 

DATE: October 16, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sonna Stampone, Executive Director, 

Federal Labor Relations Authority 

(FLRA); 1400 K Street, NW.; 

Washington, DC 20424–0001; (202) 218– 

7941. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C. (as amended 

by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978) 

requires each agency to establish, in 

accordance with regulations prescribed 

by the Office of Personnel Management, 

one or more Performance Review Boards 

(PRBs). Section 4314(c)(4) requires that 

notice of appointment of the PRB be 

published in the Federal Register. 

As required by 5 CFR 430.310, the 

following executives have been 

appointed to serve on the 2009–2011 

PRB for the FLRA, beginning October 

2009 through September 2011: 

Erin M. McDonnell, Associate Special 

Counsel for Legal Counsel and Policy, 

United States Office of Special 

Counsel. 

William D. Spencer, Clerk of the Board, 

United States Merit Systems 

Protection Board. 

Kathleen James, Deputy Director of 

Administration, National Labor 

Relations Board. 

James E. Petrucci, Director, Dallas 

Regional Office, Federal Labor 

Relations Authority. 

Susan McCluskey, Chief Counsel for the 

Chairman, Federal Labor Relations 

Authority. 

Catherine V. Emerson, Director, Office 

of Policy and Personnel Management, 

Federal Labor Relations Authority. 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 4134(c)(4). 

Dated: October 9, 2009. 

Sonna Stampone, 

Executive Director. 

[FR Doc. E9–24947 Filed 10–15–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6727–01–P 

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting 

DATE: October 21, 2009–10 a.m. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES