alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 12/31/99
BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           13394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1338
<ALLOWANCES>                                       200
<INVENTORY>                                       3755
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 18521
<PP&E>                                            5720
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   21152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            12493
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      (9831)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     21152
<SALES>                                          13016
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 13016
<CGS>                                            13341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    13341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 13591
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (22192)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22192)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.08)


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 702
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 702 appear at 84 FR 1606, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 702.703 CECL transition provisions. ( a ) *Eligibility.* The NCUA shall use the transition provisions of this subpart in determining a credit union's net worth category under this part, as applicable, if: ( 1 ) The credit union has not adopted CECL before its first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2022; and
( 2 ) The credit union records a reduction in retained earnings due to the adoption of CECL.
( b ) *Determination of CECL transition amount.* ( 1 ) For purposes of calculating the first three quarters of the transition period, as described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the CECL transitional amount is equal to the difference between the credit union's retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the credit union adopts CECL and the credit union's retained earnings as of the closing of the fiscal year immediately prior to the credit union's adoption of CECL.
( 2 ) For purposes of calculating the fourth through twelfth quarters of the transition period, as described in paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(3) of this section, the CECL transitional amount is equal to the difference between the credit union's retained earnings as of the end of the fiscal year in which the credit union adopts CECL and the credit union's retained earnings as of the beginning of its next fiscal year.
( c ) *Calculation of CECL transition provision.* In determining the net worth category of a credit union as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the NCUA shall: ( 1 ) Increase retained earnings and total assets as reported on the Call Report for purposes of the net worth ratio by 100 percent of its CECL transitional amount during the first three quarters of the transition period (first three reporting quarters of the fiscal year in which the credit union adopts CECL);
( 2 ) Increase retained earnings and total assets as reported on the Call Report for purposes of the net worth ratio by sixty-seven percent of its CECL transitional amount during the second four quarters of the transition period (fourth reporting quarter of the fiscal year in which the credit union adopts CECL and first three reporting quarters of the next fiscal year); and
( 3 ) Increase retained earnings and total assets as reported on the Call Report for purposes of the net worth ratio by thirty-three percent of its CECL transitional amount during the final four quarters of the transition period.
Exhibit 32 (ii)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006, I, J. Robert Buchanan, Treasurer (Principal
Financial Officer) of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

        (2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.



/s/ J. ROBERT BUCHANAN
------------------------
J. Robert Buchanan
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14OF THE 1934 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT**

 

I, Peter R. Mathewson, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Kof Aldila, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

(b)   [omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];

 

(c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

 

(d)   Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: March 30, 2005 | /s/ Peter R. Mathewson |   |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                      | Peter R. Mathewson          |
|                      | Chief Executive Officer     |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Ralph C. Guild, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) (Intentionally omitted)



c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                 
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 14, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    RALPH C. GUILD                                           
|                   |  |  |  |                                                                 
|                   |  |  |  | Ralph C. Guild Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the period ended June 30, 2010:





1. Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.





Date:  August 19, 2010





/s/ Joseph KozakJoseph Kozak, Chairman, Chief Executive Officerand President





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3704 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3704

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 7.5 percent 
   threshold on the deduction for medical expenses and to allow that 
     deduction to taxpayers whether or not they itemize deductions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 2004

 Mr. McInnis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 7.5 percent 
   threshold on the deduction for medical expenses and to allow that 
     deduction to taxpayers whether or not they itemize deductions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Help Everyone Achieve Lower Taxes 
for Health Care Act of 2004'' or the ``HEALTH Care Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. MEDICAL CARE DEDUCTION ALLOWED TO ALL TAXPAYERS; REPEAL OF 7.5 
              PERCENT THRESHOLD.

    (a) In General.--Section 213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to the treatment of medical and dental expenses) is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) Allowance of Deduction.--There shall be allowed as a 
deduction the expenses paid during the taxable year, not compensated 
for by insurance or otherwise, for medical care of the taxpayer, the 
taxpayer's spouse, or a dependent (as defined in section 152).''.
    (b) Deduction Allowed Whether or Not Taxpayer Itemizes Other 
Deductions.--Subsection (a) of section 62 of such Code is amended by 
inserting after paragraph (18) the following new paragraph:
            ``(19) Medical expenses.--The deduction allowed by section 
        213.''.
    (c) De Minimis Expenses; Substantiation.--Section 213 of such Code 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) De Minimis Expenses; Substantiation.--No deduction shall be 
allowed under subsection (a) for any taxable year unless--
            ``(1) the expenses exceed $200, and
            ``(2) the taxpayer substantiates such expenses by adequate 
        records or by sufficient evidence corroborating the taxpayer's 
        own statement.''
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 31/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.031.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 31 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5429 January 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.031.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 31

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5429 January 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2011/C 031/01 | Report on the audit of the operational efficiency of the management of the European Central Bank for the financial year 2009: The management of human resources at the ECB, together with the replies of the European Central Bank | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Auditors

2011/C 031/01

Report on the audit of the operational efficiency of the management of the European Central Bank for the financial year 2009: The management of human resources at the ECB, together with the replies of the European Central Bank

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### § 615.5182 Interest rate risk management by associations and other Farm Credit System institutions other than banks.

Any association or other Farm Credit System institution other than Farm Credit banks, excluding the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, with interest rate risk that could lead to significant declines in net income or in the market value of capital must comply with the requirements of § 615.5180. The interest rate risk management program required under § 615.5180 must be commensurate with the level of interest rate risk of the institution.

[77 FR 66375, Nov. 5, 2012]
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,391-01

EX PARTE LANEY PAUL BREWER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W-65081-01-E IN THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM POTTER COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery and sentenced to fifty-one years’ imprisonment. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Brewer v. State, No. 07-14-00040-CR (Tex. App.—Amarillo Dec. 4, 2014) (not

designated for publication). 

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to pursue a pro se petition for discretionary

review through no fault of his own. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of
2

fact and conclusions of law.

Trial counsel has provided an affidavit. The appellate opinion was handed down December

4, 2014, and counsel states that he mailed a copy of the opinion and a letter advising Applicant of

his pro se PDR rights on December 8, 2014, which letter he attaches. The trial court obtained mail

logs from Applicant’s prison unit. Applicant received the letter from appellate counsel on January

8, 2015. The trial court finds that, although counsel timely mailed notification to Applicant of the

decision and of his PDR rights, “[Applicant] did not receive notice within the period which he could

file pro se petition for discretionary review ending January 5, 2015.”

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Seventh Court of Appeals in Cause No. 07-14-00040-

CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 65,081-E from the 108th District Court of Potter

County. See Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (holding in cases where

counsel was not ineffective but there has been a breakdown in the system, due process requires that

an applicant be permitted to exercise his statutory right to the appellate proceeding). Applicant shall

file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this

Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: March 9, 2016

Do not publish
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19852 Filed:01/20/22 Entered:01/21/22 10:27:43 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19852 Filed:01/20/22 Entered:01/21/22 10:27:43 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### William H. STALLINS *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 73-3

491 S.W. 2d 788

Opinion delivered March 26, 1973

*138
      *Michael G. Rothman,*for appellant.

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., by: *Frank B. Newell,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The trial court without a formal hearing denied appellant William H. Stallins’ petition for post conviction relief from a 20 year sentence on a guilty plea to assault with intent to rape. The trial court’s action was proper under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1 (c). See also *North Carolina*v. *Alford,*400 U.S. 25 (1970).

The record shows that after an original plea of not guilty to a charge of first degree rape there was some negotiation between appellant’s employed counsel and the prosecuting attorney. On January 26, 1970, the State reduced the charge to assault with intent to rape but the trial court would not accept appellant’s plea because he stated that he used no force and that the girl consented. Thereafter the State amended the information to again charge first degree rape. February 1, 1970, appellant again requested that he be permitted to plead guilty to assault with intent to rape. Before accepting the plea and sentencing appellant to twenty years in the Department of Corrections, the trial court not only satisfied himself that appellant was voluntarily pleading guilty to a crime he had committed but caused a record to be made of the proceedings had. This record clearly demonstrates that there is no merit to the many contentions that appellant now makes.

Affirmed.
PUBLIC LAW 110–60—AUG. 9, 2007 121 STAT. 563 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1384 (S. 1781): 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

July 30, considered and passed House. 

Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–60 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 118 Minner 

Avenue in Bakersfield, California, as the ‘‘Buck Owens Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. BUCK OWENS POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 118 Minner Avenue in Bakersfield, California, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Buck Owens Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Buck Owens Post Office’’. 

Approved August 9, 2007. 

Aug. 9, 2007 

[H.R. 1384]
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00124

- CR

Trinity Ringelstein v. The State Of Texas

On Appeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No s

. 12CR2435

- E

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered th ese cause s on appeal, concludes the appeals should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . The Court
orders these appeals DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 23 , 2015