alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3739

To waive time limitations specified by law in order to allow the Medal 

of Honor to be awarded posthumously to Rex T. Barber, of Terrebonne, 

Oregon, for acts of valor during World War II in attacking and shooting 

down the enemy aircraft transporting Japanese Admiral Isoroku 

Yamamoto. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2004

Mr. WALDEN of Oregon (for himself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. 

HOOLEY of Oregon, and Mr. WU) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To waive time limitations specified by law in order to allow 

the Medal of Honor to be awarded posthumously to 

Rex T. Barber, of Terrebonne, Oregon, for acts of valor 

during World War II in attacking and shooting down 

the enemy aircraft transporting Japanese Admiral 

Isoroku Yamamoto.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3739 IH 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF 

2 HONOR TO REX T. BARBER FOR VALOR DUR3 ING WORLD WAR II. 

4 (a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwith5 standing the time limitations in section 3744 of title 10, 

6 United States Code, or any other time limitation applica7 ble with respect to the awarding of certain medals to per8 sons who served in the Air Force, the President is author9 ized and requested to award the Medal of Honor post10 humously under section 3741 of that title to Colonel (re11 tired) Rex T. Barber, United States Air Force, of 

12 Terrebonne, Oregon, for the acts of valor referred to in 

13 subsection (b). 

14 (b) ACTION DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred 

15 to in subsection (a) are the conspicuous acts of gallantry 

16 and intrepidity of Rex T. Barber at the risk of his life 

17 above and beyond the call of duty on April 18, 1943, while 

18 serving as a first lieutenant in the 339th Fighter Squad19 ron of the South Pacific Air Forces, Army Air Corps, in 

20 successfully attacking and shooting down the enemy 

21 bomber aircraft transporting Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, 

22 the Commander in Chief of the Combined Japanese Fleet 

23 and architect of Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor.

Æ
```

[110th Congress Public Law 54]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ054.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 551]]

Public Law 110-54
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide an exception 
to the 60-day limit on Medicare reciprocal billing arrangements between 
   two physicians during the period in which one of the physicians is 
 ordered to active duty as a member of a reserve component of the Armed 
             Forces. <<NOTE: Aug. 3, 2007 -  [H.R. 2429]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO 60-DAY LIMIT ON MEDICARE RECIPROCAL 
                              BILLING ARRANGEMENTS IN CASE OF 
                              PHYSICIANS ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY IN 
                              THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1842(b)(6)(D)(iii) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395u(b)(6)(D)(iii)) is amended by inserting after ``of 
more than 60 days'' the following: ``or are provided (before January 1, 
2008) over a longer continuous period during all of which the first 
physician has been called or ordered to active duty as a member of a 
reserve component of the Armed Forces''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The <<NOTE: 42 USC 1395u note.>> amendment made 
by subsection (a) shall apply to services furnished on or after the date 
of the enactment of this section.

    Approved August 3, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2429
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            May 23, considered and passed House.
            July 24, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
08/01/2012 09:42 FAX 2024935142 FAA -+ OMS 141 001/002

# --------------------------------~--------------~----*- ..........

# ,,~------,-------

6:; Cilifcrnl.a Sueet Suite 210 

## • San Franeiseo California 94104

(415) 4.21·2500 i3X (-415) 421·256'0 

### Michael L. Dworkin at'ld Associates La"'**Offi.::~:s**

Hearing**Dock~t.** AGC-430 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Wilbur Wright**Building~** 

### Suite 2Wl000 Washington, D.C. 20591 (FAX: l-202-493-5142) The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

### Administrative Law Judge U.S. 

### Department of Transportation 

### Office ofHearings. M-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. East Building, Ground Floor. Room 

### El2-320 Washi.ngton, D.C. 20590 (FAX: 1-202-366-7536) Kate 

### Barber, Esq. Office oftheRegional Counsel, AGL-7 Federal Aviation Adn:linistration Great Lakes Region 2300 East Devon Des**Plaines~** IL 60018 (FAX: 1-847-294-7498)


### RE: MARTINAIRE AVIATION, LLC FAA**Ca~e** No. 2011-GL
..70-0205 

### FDMS: FAA•2011-1295

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: 

### The parties have agreed to settle 1his matter. May**2S~** 201:2



### By this letter. Maninaire Aviation. 

### LLC withdraws its request for hearing and requests 

### that this proceeding be tenninated. This request does not constitute, nor be deemed to constitute, an admission08/01/2012 09:42 FAX 2024935142 FAA + OMS



### Hearing Docket CJerk, 

### Judge Goodwin and Kate Barber, Esq. Re; MartinaireAviation, LLC 

### May 25,2012 Page2**~** 002/002

by 

### Martinaire**Aviation~** LLC 

### oftbe matters 

### alleged in the**FAA~s** Complaint, or in the FAA>s Order Assessing Civil Penalty, which Martinaire continues to deny. 

### We trust that 

### an appropriate 

### Order Tenninating Proceeding will b issued. Respectfully submitted,



### cc: Martinaire Aviation, 

### LLC**ooss~ aN~** **Nr~~oMa**
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Icagen, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, P. Kay Wagoner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      | 
|Dated: March 16, 2009 |  | /s/ P. Kay Wagoner     
|                      |  | P. Kay Wagoner, Ph.D.  
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3555

To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit stationary sources located in ozone 

nonattainment areas from purchasing nitrogen oxide emission credits 

under the Environmental Protection Agency’s nitrogen oxide trading 

program without the consent of the State in which such source is located, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2003

Mr. MORAN of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit stationary sources 

located in ozone nonattainment areas from purchasing 

nitrogen oxide emission credits under the Environmental 

Protection Agency’s nitrogen oxide trading program without the consent of the State in which such source is 

located, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3555 IH 

1 SECTION 1. NOX EMISSION TRADING BY SOURCES IN 

2 OZONE NONATTAINMENT AREAS. 

3 Section 126 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7426) 

4 is amended by adding the following new subsection at the 

5 end thereof: 

6 ‘‘(d) NOX TRADING.—No stationary source of oxides 

7 of nitrogen that is located in an ozone nonattainment area 

8 may purchase nitrogen oxide emission credits under any 

9 emissions trading program established by the Environ10 mental Protection Agency or use any other authority pro11 vided by rules promulgated by the Administrator that 

12 would permit emissions of oxides of nitrogen from such 

13 source in excess of emission limits for that air pollutant 

14 otherwise applicable to that source under the State imple15 mentation plan and section 407 of this Act.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Anil K. Jain, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of APA Optics, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly represent in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation: and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to affect, the registrant's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors:

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls over financial reporting.

February 13, 2004

Signature:   /s/ Anil K. Jain
             -------------------
Print Name:  Anil K. Jain
             --------------
Print Title: Chief Financial Officer
             -------------------------


<PAGE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3691

To prohibit the Office of Federal Detention Trustee from constructing Federal 

detention centers and to prohibit the Department of Justice from siting 

a detention center or Federal prison in Maryland, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2003

Mr. RUPPERSBERGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To prohibit the Office of Federal Detention Trustee from 

constructing Federal detention centers and to prohibit 

the Department of Justice from siting a detention center 

or Federal prison in Maryland, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON THE SITING OF CERTAIN DE4 TENTION CENTERS AND PRISONS. 

5 (a) FEDERAL DETENTION CENTERS.—The Office of 

6 Federal Detention Trustee in the Department of Justice 

7 may not expend any funds for the construction of, or the 
2

•HR 3691 IH 

1 solicitation of construction proposals for, any Federal de2 tention center. 

3 (b) CENTERS AND PRISONS IN MARYLAND.—The At4 torney General of the United States is prohibited from 

5 constructing or acquiring any property or facilities in the 

6 State of Maryland to be used as a detention center or Fed7 eral prison.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 725
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 725 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 725.3 Regular membership. ( a ) A natural person credit union may become a Regular member of the Facility by: ( 1 ) Making application on a form approved by the Facility;
( 2 ) Subscribing to capital stock of the Facility in an amount equal to one-half of 1 percent of the credit union's paid-in and unimpaired capital and surplus, as determined in accordance with § 725.5(b) of this part, and forwarding with its completed application funds equal to one-half of this stock subscription; and
( 3 ) Furnishing the following reports and documents with the completed membership application: ( i ) A copy of the credit union's financial and statistical report for the most recent calendar month; and
( ii ) Copies of the credit union's charter and bylaws, unless the credit union is federally chartered.
( b ) [Reserved]
[44 FR 49437, Aug. 23, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 1371, Jan. 13, 1982; 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019; 85 FR 23735, Apr. 29, 2020]
§ 121.345 Radio equipment. ( a ) No person may operate an airplane unless it is equipped with radio equipment required for the kind of operation being conducted.
( b ) Where two independent (separate and complete) radio systems are required by §§ 121.347 and 121.349, each system must have an independent antenna installation except that, where rigidly supported nonwire antennas or other antenna installations of equivalent reliability are used, only one antenna is required.
( c ) ATC transponder equipment installed within the time periods indicated below must meet the performance and environmental requirements of the following TSO's: ( 1 ) *Through January 1, 1992:* ( i ) Any class of TSO-C74b or any class of TSO-C74c as appropriate, provided that the equipment was manufactured before January 1, 1990; or
( ii ) The appropriate class of TSO-C112 (Mode S).
( 2 ) *After January 1, 1992:* The appropriate class of TSO-C112 (Mode S). For purposes of paragraph (c) (2) of this section, “installation” does not include— ( i ) Temporary installation of TSO-C74b or TSO-C74c substitute equipment, as appropriate, during maintenance of the permanent equipment;
( ii ) Reinstallation of equipment after temporary removal for maintenance; or
( iii ) For fleet operations, installation of equipment in a fleet aircraft after removal of the equipment for maintenance from another aircraft in the same operator's fleet.
[Doc. No. 6258, 29 FR 19205, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-101, 37 FR 28499, Dec. 27, 1972; Amdt. 121-190, 52 FR 3391, Feb. 3, 1987]
Slip Op. 23-

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

TRINA SOLAR (CHANGZHOU) SCIENCE 

& TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., ET AL.,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant,

and

AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR

SOLAR MANUFACTURING,

Defendant-Intervenor. 

Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge

Court No. 23-00219

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

[Defendant’s Motion for Remand is granted.]

Dated: December 12, 2023

Kenneth Neal Hammer, Trade Pacific PLLC, of Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. With him on the 

complaint were Jonathan M. Freed and MacKensie R. Sugama.

Joshua E. Kurland, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, U.S. Department of 

Justice, of Washington, DC, for the Defendant. With him on the brief were Brian M. Boynton,

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Patricia M. McCarthy, Director, and Reginald T. 

Blades, Jr., Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Ashlande Gelin, Office of Chief 

Counsel for Trade Enforcement & Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, of Washington, 

DC.

Laura El-Sabaawi, Wiley Rein, LLP, of Washington, DC, for Defendant-Intervenor. 

Before the court is a consent motion to remand to the United States Department of 

Commerce (“Commerce”) in Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science & Technology Co., LTD v. United 

States. Defendant’s Affirmative Motion for Remand, ECF No. 23 (Dec. 11, 2023). All parties in 

this case consent to this motion. See Def.’s Affirmative Mot. for Remand at 2. Upon consideration 
2 

of the motion the court remands, with additional guidance as welcomed by the Government. Id. 

at 8. 

 The sole issue raised in this case is the ocean freight benchmark for calculation of a 

subsidy based on less than adequate remuneration (“LTAR”). On remand, Commerce should 

consider the court’s ruling in Risen Energy Co. v. United States, Slip Op. 23-48, 2023 WL 

2890019 (CIT Apr. 11, 2023), as well the court’s other rulings on the ocean freight issue. See 

e.g., Risen Energy Co. v. United States, 570 F. Supp. 3d 1369, 1372 (CIT 2022). Commerce 

should additionally consider the statutory preference for a broadly based ocean freight rate for an 

LTAR benchmark. If other factors outweigh that interest here and compel the use of a single rate 

source, Commerce should explain with as much numerical evidence as possible why that is 

appropriate. In the absence of the ability to concretely explain a strong reason for a single rate 

source, Commerce should use a multiple route data base with such adjustments as are necessary 

and possible. 

For the forgoing reasons, the court GRANTS the motion to remand. 

/s/ Jane A. Restani 

 Jane A. Restani. Judge 

Dated: December 12, 2023 

 New York, New York
#### § 797.6 Administrative offset prior to completion of procedures.

Prior to the completion of the procedures described in § 797.7, NCUA may effect administrative offset if failure to offset would substantially prejudice its ability to collect the debt, and if the time before the payment is to be made does not reasonably permit completion of the procedures described in § 797.7. Such prior administrative offset shall be followed promptly by the completion of the procedures described in § 797.7.
**Exhibit 5.1**

 

**Consent ofSRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc.**

 

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Annual Report”) of QueenstakeResources Ltd. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

We hereby consent to the references to ourname under the heading “Narrative Description of the Business — PrincipalOperating Property — Jerritt Canyon Mine — Mineral Reserve and ResourceEstimates” in the Company’s Annual Information Form and to all otherreferences to our name included or incorporated by reference in the AnnualReport and in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-119779)(the “Registration Statement”) and we further consent to the disclosure in theAnnual Report with respect to our technical report titled “Jerritt Canyon Mine,Elko County, Nevada — Technical Report” which is currently being prepared inaccordance to National Instrument 43-101 of the Canada SecuritiesAdministrators, which the Company used, or directly quoted from, in preparingsummaries concerning the Jerritt Canyon Mine, which appear in such AnnualReport and are accordingly incorporated by reference in the RegistrationStatement.

 

 

SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc.

 

 
| By:                 | /s/ Landy Stinnet |                      |
|---------------------|------------------------|---------------------------|
|                | Name:                  | Landy Stinnet             |
|                | Title:                 | Associate Mining Engineer |
|                |                   |                      |
| March 30, 2006 |
|                     |                        |                           |  |  |

 

----
skip navigation

## Library of Congress

### Law Library of Congress

          - Ask a Librarian
          - Digital Collections
          - Library Catalogs

The Library of Congress>Law Library of Congress>News & Events

          - Law Library Home
          - About the Law Library
          - Research & Reports
          - Find Legal Resources
          - Educational & Research Opportunities
          - Visiting the Law Library
          - News & Events
          - Submit a Request

## In Custodia Legis

Official blog from the Law Library of Congress

## Find the Law Library on:

          - Facebook (external link)
          - Twitter (Law Library) (external link)
          - Twitter (Congress.gov) (external link)
          - YouTube (external link)
          - iTunes U (external link)

# Search The GLIN Archive

Research & ReportsGuide to Law OnlineLegal Research GuidesLegal TopicsGuides to Our Collections **Search Glin Archive**

InternationalNationsU.S. FederalU.S. States & TerritoriesAbout the GuideGuide Index

**Jurisdiction**United StatesAngolaArab LeagueArgentinaBoliviaBrazilCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCentral African RepublicChileColombiaCosta RicaCubaDemocratic Republic of the CongoDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorGabonGuatemalaHaitiHondurasIndonesiaJustice Studies Center of the AmericasKaramahKorea SouthKuwaitLebanonLibyan Arab JamahiriyaMaliMauritaniaMercosurMexicoMozambiqueNicaraguaOrganization of American StatesPakistanPanamaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPortugalQatarRomaniaRussiaSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSpainStudies in Latin American Constitutional HistoriesTaiwanTunisiaUSIP INPROLUnited KingdomUnited NationsUruguayWIPOYemen

**Glin Type**Law     Judicial Decision     Legal Literature     Legislative Record     All

**GLIN ID****

**Issuance date***(Enter date format as **dd-mm-yyyy**, for example, **24-10-1988**)*

**Publication date***(Enter date format as **dd-mm-yyyy**, for example, **24-10-1988**)*

**Instrument number****

**Summary keyword****

Clear  Search

## Connect with the Library

All ways to connect

### Find Us On

### Subscribe & Comment

          - RSS & E-Mail
          - Blogs

### Download & Play

          - Podcasts
          - Webcasts
          - iTunesU (external link)

### Questions

          - Ask a Librarian
          - Contact Us

About |      Press |      Jobs |      DonateInspector General |      Legal |      Accessibility |      External Link Disclaimer |      USA.gov
Speech Enabled