alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2310 Filed:01/30/18 Entered:01/30/18 15:01:35 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2310 Filed:01/30/18 Entered:01/30/18 15:01:35 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2310 Filed:01/30/18 Entered:01/30/18 15:01:35 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
§ 50.120 Transitions. ( a ) *Initial application.* ( 1 ) A national bank or Federal savings association that initially becomes subject to the minimum net stable funding requirement under § 50.1(b)(1)(i) after July 1, 2021, must comply with the requirements of subparts K through M of this part beginning on the first day of the third calendar quarter after which the national bank or Federal savings association becomes subject to this part.
( 2 ) A national bank or Federal savings association that becomes subject to the minimum net stable funding requirement under § 50.1(b)(1)(ii) must comply with the requirements of subparts K through M of this part subject to a transition period specified by the OCC.
( b ) *Transition to a different required stable funding adjustment percentage.* ( 1 ) A national bank or Federal savings association whose required stable funding adjustment percentage changes is subject to the transition periods as set forth in § 50.105(c).
( 2 ) A national bank or Federal savings association institution that is no longer subject to the minimum stable funding requirement of this part pursuant to § 50.1(b)(1)(i) based on the size of total consolidated assets, cross-jurisdictional activity, total nonbank assets, weighted short-term wholesale funding, or off-balance sheet exposure calculated in accordance with the Call Report, or instructions to the FR Y-9LP, the FR Y-15, or equivalent reporting form, as applicable, for each of the four most recent calendar quarters may cease compliance with the requirements of subparts K through M of this part as of the first day of the first calendar quarter after it is no longer subject to § 50.1(b).
( c ) *Reservation of authority.* The OCC may extend or accelerate any compliance date of this part if the OCC determines such extension or acceleration is appropriate. In determining whether an extension or acceleration is appropriate, the OCC will consider the effect of the modification on financial stability, the period of time for which the modification would be necessary to facilitate compliance with the requirements of subparts K through M of this part, and the actions the national bank or Federal savings association is taking to come into compliance with the requirements of subparts K through M of this part.
[86 FR 9210, Feb. 11, 2021]
#### CAMPTON *v.*GRIFFITH, ET AL.

Chancery will not examine a case, merely to settle the question of costs.

In Chancery. The parties had settled the matter in controversy, and submitted the question of costs to the eourt.

By the Court.

We will not examine the papers and proofs in this case, to determine the facts and principles, merely to determine a question of costs. So we have heretofore determined; *antetp.*95. Such is the course of chancery in other countries; 2 *John. Ch.*318; 2 Vesey, 223.
§ 31.2 Insider lending restrictions and reporting requirements. ( a ) *General rule.* National banks, Federal savings associations, and their insiders shall comply with the provisions contained in 12 CFR part 215 (Regulation O).
( b ) *Enforcement.* The Comptroller of the Currency administers and enforces insider lending standards and reporting requirements as they apply to national banks, Federal savings associations, and their insiders.
[61 FR 54536, Oct. 21, 1996, as amended at 82 FR 8109, Jan. 23, 2017]
Exhibit 10.8#
 
 www.prxi.com  www.rmstitanic.net
  VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
 
 Consulting Agreement
   ENGAGEMENT
 TERM
  NATURE OF SERVICES
  www.bodiesrevealed.com www.rmstitanic.net www.titanicscience.com




---



##### 



EXPENSES/PAYMENTS TO VENDORS
  NON-EXCLUSIVITY
  RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES
    COMPENSATION
 2




---



##### 



OWNERSHIP
 TERMINATION
   LIMITATION ON SERVICES
   REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
 3




---



##### 



CONFIDENTIALITY
 PREMIERS IMAGE
  TRADEMARKS.
 COMPLIANCE
 4




---



##### 



ASSIGNMENT ab initio
 GOVERNING LAW/JURISDICTION
 NOTICES
 SURVIVAL
 ENTIRE AGREEMENT
  Sincerely,
Premier Exhibitions, Inc.by:   /s/ Christopher J. DavinoChristopher J. DavinoPresident and Chief Executive Officer 
 /s/ Douglas Banker

Douglas Banker
  5
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3677

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require that each 

prescription drug sold at retail bear a label that states the full retail 

price of the drug. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2003

Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

require that each prescription drug sold at retail bear 

a label that states the full retail price of the drug.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prescription Drug Re5 tail Price Disclosure Act’’. 
2

•HR 3677 IH 

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT; RE2 QUIREMENT OF LABEL STATING FULL RE3 TAIL PRICE OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS. 

4 Section 502 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

5 Act (21 U.S.C. 352) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(w) If it is a drug subject to section 503(b) and is 

8 sold at retail without bearing a label that states the full 

9 retail price for the drug, which price is the retail price 

10 that applies in the absence of—

11 ‘‘(1) any discount; 

12 ‘‘(2) any payment for the drug under an insur13 ance policy or by an entity that provides health serv14 ices on a pre-paid basis; and 

15 ‘‘(3) any payment for the drug under a Federal 

16 or State health benefits program or a State com17 pensation program.’’.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-2162-000]

Take notice that on April 10, 2000, Tenaska Power Services Company (Tenaska), tendered for filing notice of withdrawal from the Western Regional Transmission Association.

Tenaska requests that such withdrawal become effective immediately.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before May 1, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.  This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr., 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10112  Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23609-2 Filed:02/22/23 Entered:02/22/23 22:00:04 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23609-2 Filed:02/22/23 Entered:02/22/23 22:00:04 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3670 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 3670

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a 100 percent tax 
     on amounts received from trading with Cuba if the trading is 
conditioned explicitly or otherwise on lobbying Congress to lift trade 
                    or travel restrictions on Cuba.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2003

  Mr. Deutsch (for himself and Mr. Menendez) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a 100 percent tax 
     on amounts received from trading with Cuba if the trading is 
conditioned explicitly or otherwise on lobbying Congress to lift trade 
                    or travel restrictions on Cuba.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Anti-Communist Cooperation Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. 100 PERCENT TAX ON AMOUNTS RECEIVED BY CERTAIN PERSONS FROM 
              TRADING WITH CUBA.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by inserting after chapter 44 the following new chapter:

 ``CHAPTER 45--TAX ON AMOUNTS RECEIVED BY CERTAIN PERSONS FROM TRADING 
                               WITH CUBA

                              ``Sec. 4986. Imposition of tax.

``SEC. 4986. IMPOSITION OF TAX.

    ``(a) In General.--There is hereby imposed on any United States 
person a tax of 100 percent of the amount received by such person 
directly or indirectly from the sale, lease, or licensing of property 
or services for consumption or use in Cuba if there is an agreement or 
understanding that such person will directly or indirectly lobby 
Congress to lift trade or travel restrictions on Cuba.
    ``(b) Administrative Provisions.--
            ``(1) Payments taxed only once.--Gross income shall not 
        include any payment on which tax is imposed by subsection (a).
            ``(2) Other administrative provisions.--For purposes of 
        subtitle F, any tax imposed by this section shall be treated as 
        a tax imposed by subtitle A.''
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of chapters for subtitle D is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to chapter 44 the 
following new item:

                              ``Chapter 45. Tax on amounts received by 
                                        certain persons from trading 
                                        with Cuba.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 617.7615 What should the System institution do when it decides to lease acquired agricultural real estate? ( a ) Notify the previous owner, ( 1 ) Within 15 days of the System institution's decision to lease acquired agricultural real estate, it must notify the previous owner, by certified mail, of the property's appraised rental value, as established by an accredited appraiser, and of the previous owner's right to: ( i ) Lease the property at a rate equivalent to the appraised rental value of the property, or
( ii ) Offer to lease the property at rate that is less than the appraised rental value of the property.
( 2 ) That any offer must be received within 15 days of receipt of the notice.
( b ) Act on an offer to lease the acquired agricultural real estate at a rate equivalent to the appraised rental value of the property. ( 1 ) Within 15 days after receipt of such offer, the System institution may accept the offer to lease the property at the appraised rental value and lease the property to the previous owner, or
( 2 ) Within 15 days after receipt of such offer, the System institution may reject the offer to lease the property at the appraised rental value when the institution determines that the previous owner: ( i ) Does not have the resources available to conduct a successful farming or ranching operation; or
( ii ) Cannot meet all the payments, terms, and conditions of such lease.
( c ) Act on an offer to lease the acquired agricultural real estate at a rate that is less than the appraised rental value of the property. ( 1 ) The System institution must consider the offer to lease the property at a rate that is less than the appraised rental value of the property. Notice of the decision to accept or reject such offer must be provided to the previous owner within 15 days of receipt of the offer.
( 2 ) If the System institution accepts the offer to lease the property at less than the appraised rental value, it must notify the previous owner and lease the property to the previous owner.
( 3 ) If the institution rejects the offer, the System institution must notify the previous owner of this decision. The previous owner has 15 days after receipt of the notice in which to agree to lease the property at such rate or under such terms and conditions. The System institution may not lease the property to any other person: ( i ) At a rate equal to or less than that offered by the previous owner; or
( ii ) On different terms and conditions than those that were extended to the previous owner without first informing the previous owner by certified mail and providing an opportunity to lease the property at such rate or under such terms and conditions.
#### C. H. Barnes, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. Walter W. Carr, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion Filed February 4, 1913.

Per Curiam.

This case is controlled by the opinion this day rendered in another case between the same parties, and the judgment accordingly is affirmed.

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Duval County.
Turner Lett 

League of Conservation Voters 

Policy and Lobbying 

william lott@lcv.org 

601-665-7471 

My name is Turner Lett and I appreciate this opportunity today to speak in support of 

the Environmental Protection Agency's standards limiting carbon pollution from power 

plants. 

As a Mississippi native, I witnessed firsthand one of the most destructive storms to hit 

the United States: Hurricane Katrina. On the morning of August 29, 2005, Hurricane 

Katrina pummeled the Mississippi Gulf and brought with it a massive storm surge that 

completely flooded buildings and homes and left too many stranded and in need of 

assistance. Katrina's storm surge was the highest ever recorded on the U.S. Coast- 27.8 

feet at Pass Christian, Mississippi. In its wake, Katrina damaged some 90,000 square 

miles and took the lives of 2,000 people- people who had never witnessed and did not 

anticipate a storm so powerful. 

Many describe Katrina as a natural disaster- a product of nature that is completely 

unaffected by our actions. However, I know that operating under the assumption that 

we play no part in increasing the severity of storms and other disasters will only further 

harm, not help us. It will not cause disasters to occur more infrequently; it will not 

decrease their potency; and it will not help save lives of Americans. 

As I speak, people are coping with climate change's impact- prolonged heat waves, 

more severe droughts that lead to extended wildfire seasons, and rises in sea level that 

threaten to inundate coastal cities and ecosystems. 
These disasters cannot go unnoticed. Rhetoric that does not acknowledge our 

contribution to climate change only engenders inaction. And inaction on climate change 

will prove too costly. 

Fortunately, the EPA is fully aware that climate change is occurring and human actions 

are the main cause. The new proposed standard seeks to cut carbon pollution from its 

primary source: power plants. Coal and gas-fired power plants are the single largest 

source of carbon pollution in the United States- accounting for roughly 40% of annual 

global warming emissions. That is why reducing power plant emissions is essential in 

heralding a cleaner, healthier environment. And EPA's new rule to limit power plants' 

carbon pollution is the biggest step our country has taken to reverse climate change's 

harmful trend. 

Climate change is the most pressing problem our nation faces, and I commend the work 

EPA has done and continues to do to nurture a cleaner, safer, and healthier planet. Now 

we must turn to our representatives in Congress and to our state leaders to ease this 

critical transition to a cleaner energy policy. I hope they support EPA's plan without any 

objections and seek to implement the plan to the best of their ability- for it is what is 

best for our environment, our economy, and our wellbeing. 

Thank you.
#### § 794.111 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the head of the agency finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this regulation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                           5
<LEGEND>
(Replace this text with legend, if applicable)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                      0000796333
<NAME>                                                    Brown Flournoy Equity
<MULTIPLIER>                                                        1
<CURRENCY>                                                U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                              SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                     1
<CASH>                                                      1,589,304
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  28,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            1,630,969
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             15,300,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         631,116
<BONDS>                                                    20,400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               15,300,386
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            3,531,991
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            2,571,787
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          1,457,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (497,546)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (497,546)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (497,546)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0.000
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3694 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3694

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for 
          clean-fuel vehicles and certain refueling property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2003

Mr. Sherman (for himself, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Honda, and Mr. 
    Baird) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for 
          clean-fuel vehicles and certain refueling property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR CLEAN-FUEL VEHICLES AND CERTAIN 
              REFUELING PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (B) of section 179A(b)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to qualified clean-fuel vehicle 
property) is amended by striking ``December 31, 2003'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2006''.
    (b) Phaseout.--Clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) of section 
179A(b)(1)(B) of such Code (relating to phaseout) is amended by 
striking ``2004'', ``2005'', and ``2006'', and inserting ``2007'', 
``2008'', and ``2009'', respectively.
    (c) Termination.--Subsection (f) of section 179A of such Code 
(relating to termination) is amended by striking ``December 31, 2006'' 
and inserting ``December 31, 2009''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to property placed in service after December 31, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 615.5130 Procedures.

Procedures relating to issuance, pricing, payment of interest, redemption, replacement of lost or stolen bonds and other matters shall be promulgated under the authority of this regulation as operating instructions to banks and associations.

[37 FR 11434, June 7, 1972]