NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Required fields are denoted by "+".

Report Date: 05/05/2010            Control Technology Determinations (Freeform)
Facility Information: LION OIL COMPANY

RBLC ID: AR-0100
+ Corporate/Company Name: LION OIL COMPANY
+ Facility Name: LION OIL COMPANY Facility County: UNION Facility State: AR Facility ZIP Code: 71730 Facility Country: USA Facility Contact Name: CHUCK HAMMOCK Facility Contact Phone: 8708641289 Facility Contact Email: CHUCK.HAMMOCK@LIONOIL.COM EPA Region: 6 Agency Code: AR001 Agency Name: ARKANSAS DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Agency Contact: MR. TOM RHEAUME Agency Phone: (501)682-0762 Agency Email: rheaume@adeq.state.ar.us Other Agency Contact Info:

+ Permit Number: 868-AOP-R5
+ SIC Code: 2911 NAICS Code: 115310 Facility Registry System Number: 110017419667 Application Accepted Received Date: 02/26/2007 ACT Permit Issuance Date: 10/01/2007 ACT Date determination entered in RBLC: 01/23/2009 Date determination last updated: 04/09/2010 Permit Type: A: New/Greenfield Facility Permit URL: Facility Description: PETROLEUM REFINING Permit Notes:

Affected Boundaries: LION OIL COMPANY

+ Boundary (Class 1 Previous Page+ Boundary (Class 1 Area or US Border Name): Caney Creek Boundary Type (Class 1 or Intl Border): CLASS1 Distance: Between 100km and 250km Class 1 Area State: AR

Facility-wide Emissions: LION OIL COMPANY

+ Pollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide Facility-wide Emissions Increase: 1450.7000 (Tons/Year)

+ Pollutant Name: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Facility-wide Emissions Increase: 635.3000 (Tons/Year)

+ Pollutant Name: Particulate Matter (PM) Facility-wide Emissions Increase: 304.4000 (Tons/Year)

+ Pollutant Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx) Facility-wide Emissions Increase: 544.7000 (Tons/Year)

+ Pollutant Name: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Facility-wide Emissions Increase: 9510.3000 (Tons/Year)

Process Information: LION OIL COMPANY

+ Process Name: NEW NO. 4 VACUUM FURNACE, SN-805N
+ Process Type: 50.005 Primary Fuel: NATURAL OR NSPS SUBPART J QUALITY GAS Throughput: 142.20 Throughput Unit: MMBTU/H Process Notes: SN-805N IS A 142.2 MMBTU/HR (ANNUAL) SOURCE. THE FURNACE WILL BE FUELED BY NSPS SUBPART J QUALITY GAS. AS A RESULT OF THE REFINERY EXPANSION PERMIT REVISION, THIS SOURCE HAS UNDERGONE PSD REVIEW FOR PM10, NOX, AND CO. BACT FOR THIS SOURCE IS GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE AND NEXT GENERATION ULTRA LOW NOX BURNERS.

Pollutant Information: LION OIL COMPANY - NEW NO. 4 VACUUM FURNACE, SN-805N

+ Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) )+ CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified

+ Control Method Code: P
+ Control Method Description: NEXT GENERATION ULTRA LOW NOX BURNERS Emission Limit 1: 0.0350 Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU Emission Limit 1 Avg. Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: 0 Emission Limit 2 Unit: Emission Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: Standard Emission Limit: 0 Standard Emission Limit Unit: Standard Limit Avg. Time/Condition:

+ Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: OPERATING PERMIT , SIP Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions?: Y
+ Percent Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Cost Effectiveness: 14,111 ($/ton) Incremental Cost Effectiveness: Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No Dollar Year Used In Cost Estimates: 2007 Pollutants/Compliance Notes: SCR

+ Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM) Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )

+ CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified

+ Control Method Code: P
+ Control Method Description: GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE Emission Limit 1: 0.0075 Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU Emission Limit 1 Avg. Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGEEmission Limit 2: 0 Emission Limit 2 Unit: Emission Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: Standard Emission Limit: 0 Standard Emission Limit Unit: Standard Limit Avg. Time/Condition:

+ Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions?: N
+ Percent Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Cost Effectiveness: Incremental Cost Effectiveness: Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No Dollar Year Used In Cost Estimates: Pollutants/Compliance Notes:

+ Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )

+ CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified

+ Control Method Code: P
+ Control Method Description: GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU Emission Limit 1 Avg. Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: 0 Emission Limit 2 Unit: Emission Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: Standard Emission Limit: 0 Standard Emission Limit Unit: Standard Limit Avg.Standard Limit Avg. Time/Condition:

+ Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions?:

+ Percent Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Cost Effectiveness: 11,626 ($/ton) Incremental Cost Effectiveness: Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No Dollar Year Used In Cost Estimates: 2007 Pollutants/Compliance Notes: CATALYTIC INCINERATION

Process Information: LION OIL COMPANY

+ Process Name: #7 FCCU CATALYST REGENERATOR, SN-809
+ Process Type: 50.003 Primary Fuel: Throughput: 9.34 Throughput Unit: MMBBL CHARGE STOCK Process Notes: NO NEW EMISSIONS SOURCES ARE INCLUDED IN THE SCOPEProcess Notes: NO NEW EMISSIONS SOURCES ARE INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT FOR THE FCCU EXPANSION. HOWEVER, EMISSIONS INCREASES WILL RESULT FROM THE INCREASED THROUGHPUT. SN-809 IS THE EXHAUST STACK FROM THE CATALYST REGENERATOR. HOT FLUE GAS LEAVING THE REGENERATOR PASSES THROUGH 3 SETS OF CYCLONES TO REMOVE CATALYST FINES & THEN IS USED TO PRODUCE STEAM IN THE WASTE HEAT BOILER BEFORE EXITING THE STACK. THIS SOURCE INSTALLED IN 1973. PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED SOURCE, SN-848, THE VENT SYSTEM FOR 2 STORAGE BINS USED TO STORE CATALYST IN THE CATALYTIC CRACKING PROCESS, HAS BEEN ROUTED TO THE WET GAS SCRUBBER OF THE #7 FCCU UNIT. THE #7 FCCU WAS MODIFIED IN 2004 TO INSTALL WET GAS SCRUBBER FOR THE CONTROL OF PM10 & SO2 EMISSIONS. SIMULTANEOUS WITH THE INSTALLATION OF THE SCRUBBER, THE FACILITY THIS UNIT IS DESIGNED TO CONVERT APPROX 20,000 BPD OF GAS OIL FROM THE REFINERY CRUDE UNITS & OTHER SOURCES INTO MORE USEFUL PRODUCTS. GAS OIL ENTERING THE UNIT IS FIRST HEATED TO 675°F IN THE #7 FCCU FURNACE (SN-808) WHICH IS FIRED WITH NSPS SUBPART J QUALITY GAS & EQUIPPED WITH LOW NOX BURNERS. THE HOT OIL IS THEN CONTACTED WITH A HOT (APPROXIMATELY 1350°F) FLUIDIZED CATALYST WHICH CAUSES THE GAS OIL TO CRACK INTO LIGHTER PRODUCTS. THE CATALYST IS THEN SEPARATED FROM THE PRODUCTS IN THE REACTOR AND RETURNED TO THE REGENERATOR. IN THE REGENERATOR, COKE WHICH HAS DEPOSITED ON THE CATALYST IS BURNED OFF & THE CATALYST IS RECYCLED. THE HOT FLUE GAS LEAVING THE REGENERATOR PASSES THROUGH TWO (2) SETS OF CYCLONES TO REMOVE ANY CATALYST FINES & IS THEN USED TO PRODUCE STEAM IN THE WASTE HEAT BOILER. THE HOT GASES ARE THEN COOLED TO LESS THAN 500°F BEFORE EXITING THE #7 CATALYST REGENERATOR STACK (SN-809). THE LIGHT PRODUCTS PRODUCED IN THE REACTOR ARE SEPARATED IN THE FRACTIONATOR TOWER & USED FOR VARIOUS PURPOSES. THE FCCU CATALYST REGENERATOR STACK (SN-809) IS EQUIPPED WITH A WET GAS SCRUBBER (WGS) FOR THE CONTROL OF SO2 & PM10 EMIS

Pollutant Information: LION OIL COMPANY - #7 FCCU CATALYST REGENERATOR, SN-809

+ Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable (FPM) Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )

+ CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified

+ Control Method Code: A+ Control Method Description: WET GAS SCRUBBER Emission Limit 1: 0.5000 Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/1000 Emission Limit 1 Avg. Time/Condition: COKE BURN Emission Limit 2: 0 Emission Limit 2 Unit: Emission Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: Standard Emission Limit: 0 Standard Emission Limit Unit: Standard Limit Avg. Time/Condition:

+ Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT , SIP , OPERATING PERMIT , OTHER Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions?: Y
+ Percent Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Cost Effectiveness: 88,074 ($/ton) Incremental Cost Effectiveness: Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No Dollar Year Used In Cost Estimates: 2007 Pollutants/Compliance Notes: WET ESP

+ Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )

+ CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified

+ Control Method Code: P
+ Control Method Description: HIGH TEMPERATURE REGENERATION Emission Limit 1: 100.0000 Emission Limit 1 Unit: PPMDV Emission Limit 1 Avg. Time/Condition: 365 DAY AVERAGE, CEMS Emission Limit 2: 500.0000 Emission Limit 2 Unit: PPMDV Emission Limit 2 Avg.Emission Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 1-HR AVERAGE, CEMS Standard Emission Limit: 0 Standard Emission Limit Unit: Standard Limit Avg. Time/Condition:

+ Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , SIP , OPERATING PERMIT , OTHER Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions?: N
+ Percent Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Cost Effectiveness: Incremental Cost Effectiveness: Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No Dollar Year Used In Cost Estimates: Pollutants/Compliance Notes:

Process Information: LION OIL COMPANY

+ Process Name: #9 COOLING TOWER, SN-853-9
+ Process Type: 50.006 Primary Fuel: Throughput: 10.50 Throughput Unit: BILLION GAL/12-MONTH Process Notes: THE #9 COOLING TOWER WILL BE INSTALLED AS A RESULT OF THE REFINERY EXPANSION. SN-853-9 WAS ADDED TO ACCOUNT FOR EMISSIONS FROM THE SOURCE SINCE THESE EMISSIONS WERE RELIED UPON IN THE PSD NETTING ANALYSIS. THIS SOURCE UNDERWENT A BACT REVIEW FOR PARTICULATE. BACT WAS DETERMINED TO BE THE USE OF DRIFT ELIMINATORS.

Pollutant Information: LION OIL COMPANY - #9 COOLING TOWER, SN-853-9

+ Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM) Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )

+ CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified+ Control Method Code: A
+ Control Method Description: DRIFT ELIMINATORS, 0.005% Emission Limit 1: 3000.0000 Emission Limit 1 Unit: MG/L TDS CONCENTRATI Emission Limit 1 Avg. Time/Condition: ANNUAL AVERAGE, MONITORED WEEKLY Emission Limit 2: 0 Emission Limit 2 Unit: Emission Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: Standard Emission Limit: 0 Standard Emission Limit Unit: Standard Limit Avg. Time/Condition:

+ Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions?: N
+ Percent Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Cost Effectiveness: Incremental Cost Effectiveness: Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No Dollar Year Used In Cost Estimates: Pollutants/Compliance Notes:

Process Information: LION OIL COMPANY

+ Process Name: PRE-FLASH COLUMN REBOILER, SN-803
+ Process Type: 50.005 Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS OR NSPS J QUALITY GAS Throughput: 40.00 Throughput Unit: MMBTU/H Process Notes: THE PRE-FLASH COLUMN REBOILER (SN-803) IS A NSPSProcess Notes: THE PRE-FLASH COLUMN REBOILER (SN-803) IS A NSPS SUBPART J QUALITY GAS FIRED FURNACE USED TO MAINTAIN THE TEMPERATURE IN THE COLUMN. RETROFIT SN-803 WITH NEXT GENERATION ULTRA LOW NOX BURNERS. THESE SOURCES WILL NOT EXPERIENCE AN INCREASE IN NOX OR CO EMISSIONS. THEREFORE, A BACT ANALYSIS WAS NOT REQUIRED FOR NOX OR CO FROM THESE TWO HEATERS. A PM10 BACT ANALYSIS WAS STILL REQUIRED. THIS RETROFIT IS REQUIRED BY THE CONSENT DECREE.

Pollutant Information: LION OIL COMPANY - PRE-FLASH COLUMN REBOILER, SN-803

+ Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM) Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )

+ CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified

+ Control Method Code: P
+ Control Method Description: GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE Emission Limit 1: 0.0075 Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU Emission Limit 1 Avg. Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: 0 Emission Limit 2 Unit: Emission Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: Standard Emission Limit: 0 Standard Emission Limit Unit: Standard Limit Avg. Time/Condition:

+ Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions?: N
+ Percent Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Cost Effectiveness: Incremental Cost Effectiveness: Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No Dollar Year Used InDollar Year Used In Cost Estimates: Pollutants/Compliance Notes:

Process Information: LION OIL COMPANY

+ Process Name: CONVERTED #4 PRE-FLASH COLUMN REBOILER, SN-805
+ Process Type: 50.005 Primary Fuel: NATURAL OR NSPS SUBPART J QUALITY GAS Throughput: 75.00 Throughput Unit: MMBTU/H Process Notes: SN-805 IS NOT SUBJECT TO BACT FOR NOX AND CO BECAUSE THESE SOURCES ARE BEING REPLACED WITH ULTRA LOW NOX BURNERS BEFORE THE REFINERY EXPANSION WILL COME ON LINE, AND THUS, WILL EXPERIENCE DECREASES IN NOX AND CO. BOTTOMS FROM THE COLUMN ARE HEATED IN THE FUEL GAS FIRED VACUUM FURNACE (SN 805) PRIOR TO VACUUM DISTILLATION. THE VACUUM COLUMN SEPARATES THE BOTTOMS INTO GAS OIL AND ASPHALT PRODUCTS. SN-805 IS A 75 MM BTU/HR REBOILER (NOMINAL DESIGN). IT WAS INSTALLED IN 1996 AND WILL BE RETROFITTED WITH NEXT GENERATION, ULTRA LOW NOX BURNERS. ON MAY 17, 2000, THIS SOURCE WAS TESTED FOR NOX EMISSIONS USING EPA REFERENCE METHOD 7E PURSUANT TO §19.702 OF REGULATION 19, AND 40 C.F.R., PART 52, SUBPART E. THE TEST RESULTS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT DEMONSTRATED COMPLIANCE. AS A RESULT OF THE REFINERY EXPANSION PERMIT REVISION, THIS SOURCE HAS UNDERGONE PSD REVIEW FOR PM10. BACT FOR THIS SOURCE IS GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE.

Pollutant Information: LION OIL COMPANY - CONVERTED #4 PRE-FLASH COLUMN REBOILER, SN-805

+ Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM) Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )

+ CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified

+ Control Method Code: P
+ Control Method Description: GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE Emission Limit 1: 0.0075 Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU Emission Limit 1 Avg. Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: 0Emission Limit 2 Unit: Emission Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: Standard Emission Limit: 0 Standard Emission Limit Unit: Standard Limit Avg. Time/Condition:

+ Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions?: N
+ Percent Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Cost Effectiveness: Incremental Cost Effectiveness: Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No Dollar Year Used In Cost Estimates: Pollutants/Compliance Notes:

Process Information: LION OIL COMPANY

+ Process Name: NO. 4 ATMOSPHERIC FURNACE, SN-804
+ Process Type: 50.005 Primary Fuel: NATURAL OR NSPS J QUALITY GAS Throughput: 280.00 Throughput Unit: MMBTU/H Process Notes: BOTTOMS FROM THE COLUMN ARE HEATED IN THE FUEL GAS FIRED ATMOSPHERIC TOPPING FURNACE (SN 804) PRIOR TO DISTILLATION AT ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE. SN-804 IS A 280 MMBTU/HR SOURCE USED TO HEAT THE BOTTOMS FROM THE PRE-FLASH COLUMN IN ORDER TO SEPARATE THEM INTO NAPHTHA, KEROSENE, DIESEL, AND GAS OIL. THE FURNACE IS FUELED BY NSPS SUBPART J QUALITY GAS. AS A RESULT OF THE REFINERY EXPANSION PERMIT REVISION, THIS SOURCE HAS UNDERGONE PSD REVIEW FOR PM10, NOX, AND CO. BACT FOR THIS SOURCE IS GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE AND NEXT GENERATION ULTRA LOW NOX BURNERS.Pollutant Information: LION OIL COMPANY - NO. 4 ATMOSPHERIC FURNACE, SN-804

+ Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) )

+ CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified

+ Control Method Code: B
+ Control Method Description: EXISTING NEXT GENERATION ULTRA LOW NOX BURNERS Emission Limit 1: 0.0450 Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU Emission Limit 1 Avg. Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: 0 Emission Limit 2 Unit: Emission Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: Standard Emission Limit: 0 Standard Emission Limit Unit: Standard Limit Avg. Time/Condition:

+ Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT , OTHER Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions?: Y
+ Percent Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Cost Effectiveness: 10,408 ($/ton) Incremental Cost Effectiveness: Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No Dollar Year Used In Cost Estimates: 2004 Pollutants/Compliance Notes: COST FOR SLIGHTLY MORE, 0.035 LB/MMBTU, CONTROL BASED UPON NEWER ULNB

+ Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM) Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )

+ CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified

+ Control Method Code: P+ Control Method Description: GOOD COMBUSTINON PRACTICE Emission Limit 1: 0.0075 Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU Emission Limit 1 Avg. Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: 0 Emission Limit 2 Unit: Emission Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: Standard Emission Limit: 0 Standard Emission Limit Unit: Standard Limit Avg. Time/Condition:

+ Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions?: N
+ Percent Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Cost Effectiveness: Incremental Cost Effectiveness: Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No Dollar Year Used In Cost Estimates: Pollutants/Compliance Notes:

+ Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )

+ CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified

+ Control Method Code: P
+ Control Method Description: GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU Emission Limit 1 Avg. Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: 0 Emission Limit 2 Unit: Emission Limit 2 Avg.Emission Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: Standard Emission Limit: 0 Standard Emission Limit Unit: Standard Limit Avg. Time/Condition:

+ Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions?: Y
+ Percent Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Cost Effectiveness: 10,060 ($/ton) Incremental Cost Effectiveness: Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No Dollar Year Used In Cost Estimates: 2007 Pollutants/Compliance Notes: CATALYTIC OXIDATION

Previous Page