alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.7


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016, André van Niekerk, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Golden Star Resources Ltd., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:


1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ André   van Niekerk


André van Niekerk


Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer











Toronto, Canada


March 30, 2017
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LPA Holding Corp. and La Petite Academy,
Inc. (the "Companies") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 2, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gary A. Graves, Chief Executive Officer and I, Neil P. Dyment,
Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Companies.


/s/ Gary A. Graves                      /s/ Neil P. Dyment
-------------------------------------   ----------------------------------------
Gary A. Graves                          Neil P. Dyment
Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer

September 30, 2005                      September 30, 2005
Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:23145-2   Filed:12/22/22   Entered:12/22/22 13:03:17    Desc:Exhibit B   Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7


         THE WARRANTS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED
         UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE,
         AND NEITHER THE WARRANTS NOR THE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ISSUABLE UPON
         EXERCISE OF THIS WARRANT CAN BE SOLD OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED UNLESS
         THEY ARE REGISTERED AND QUALIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUCH ACT AND
         APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR IN THE OPINION OF COUNSEL
         SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY SUCH REGISTRATION AND QUALIFICATION IS NOT
         REQUIRED.

         THE WARRANTS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE
         EXCEPT IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CERTIFICATE.

__________, _____                                                ______ Warrants

                       NORWOOD PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS, INC.

                              WARRANT CERTIFICATE

         This warrant certificate ("Warrant Certificate") certifies that for
value received, [Name of Director], or registered assigns (the "Holder") is the
owner of the number of warrants ("Warrants") specified above, each of which
entitles the Holder hereof to purchase, prior to the Expiration Date (as
hereinafter defined) and upon the terms and subject to the conditions
hereinafter set forth, one fully paid and non-assessable share of Common Stock,
no par value ("Common Stock"), of Norwood Promotional Products, Inc., a Texas
corporation (the "Company"), at a purchase price of $[closing price on date of
grant] per share of Common Stock in lawful money of the United States of
America in cash or by certified or cashier's check or a combination of cash and
certified or cashier's check, subject to adjustment as hereinafter provided.

         1.      Warrant: Purchase Price

                 Each Warrant shall entitle the Holder to purchase one share of
Common Stock of the Company and the purchase price payable upon exercise of the
Warrants shall initially be $[closing price on date of grant] per share of
Common Stock, subject to adjustment as provided below (the "Purchase Price").
The Purchase Price and number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise
of each Warrant are subject to adjustment as provided in part 6.

         2.      Exercise: Expiration Date

         2.1     The Warrants vest and become exercisable, at the option of the
Holder, at any time and from time to time on and after the date hereof and on
or before the Expiration Date, upon surrender of this Warrant Certificate to
the Company together with a duly completed Notice of Exercise, in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit A, and payment of an amount equal to the Purchase
Price times the number of Warrants to be exercised. In the case of exercise of
less than
§ 611.1247 FCA review and approval—termination. ( a ) *FCA action on application.* After we receive the termination application, we will review it and either approve or disapprove the termination.
( b ) *Basis for disapproval.* We will disapprove the termination if we determine that there are one or more appropriate reasons for disapproval consistent with our authorities under the Act and our regulations. We will inform you of our reason(s) for disapproval in writing.
( c ) *Conditions of FCA approval.* We will approve your termination application only if: ( 1 ) Your stockholders have voted in favor of termination in the termination vote and in any reconsideration vote;
( 2 ) You have given us executed copies of all contracts, agreements, and other documents submitted under §§ 611.1221 and 611.1223;
( 3 ) You have paid or made adequate provision for payment of debts, including responsibility for any contingent liabilities, and for retirement of equities;
( 4 ) A Federal or State chartering authority has granted a new charter to the successor institution;
( 5 ) You deposit into escrow an amount equal to 110 percent of the estimated exit fee plus 110 percent of the estimated amount you must pay to retire equities of dissenting stockholders and Farm Credit institutions, as described in § 611.1255(c); and
( 6 ) You have fulfilled any condition of termination we impose.
( d ) *Effective date of termination.* If we approve the termination, we will revoke your charter, and the termination will be effective on the date that we provide, but no earlier than the last to occur of: ( 1 ) Fulfillment of all conditions listed in or imposed under paragraph (c) of this section;
( 2 ) Your proposed termination date;
( 3 ) Ninety (90) days after we receive your termination application described in § 611.1246; or
( 4 ) Fifteen (15) days after any reconsideration vote.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-2046-000]

Take notice that on March 3, 2000, Montana Power Company tendered for filing a certificate of concurrence in the above-referenced docket.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before May 1, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10340  Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 99.15





CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON








Golden Star Resources Ltd.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Golden Star Resources Ltd.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





I hereby consent to (i) the use of my name in connection with the following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Form 40-F”) of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) to which this consent relates: (A) the technical report entitled “43-101 Technical Report on Resources and Reserves Golden Star Resourced Ltd., Bogoso Prestea Gold Mine, Ghana” effective date December 31, 2013 and filed on March 14, 2014 (the “Bogoso Report”), (B) the technical report entitled “43-101 Technical Report for the Prestea West Reef Feasibility Study, Ghana” effective date May 1, 2013 and filed on July 26, 2013 (the “Prestea Report”, and together with the Bogoso Report, the “Reports”), (C) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2013 and (D) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2013, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from such documents and Reports in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-175542, 333-169047, 333-118958, 333-105821 and 333-105820), as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.








/s/ John Arthur_________________________


Dr. John Arthur





March 25, 2014
§ 746.206 Administration of the appeal. ( a ) *De novo review by Special Counsel.* After receipt of a timely appeal, the Special Counsel shall contact the relevant NCUA program office and request a complete set of all pertinent materials, including internal memoranda, correspondence, and records having a bearing on the initial agency determination being appealed. The Special Counsel will conduct an independent review of these materials, along with all materials submitted by the petitioner in support of the appeal. The Special Counsel will make a recommendation to the Board as to the appropriate disposition of the appeal after having evaluated the applicable legal arguments and considered the facts and circumstances that pertain to the appeal. As directed by the Board, the Special Counsel may provide his or her recommendation in writing to the Board and may make an oral presentation before the Board.
( b ) *Determination on appeal.* Within 90 calendar days from the date of receipt of an appeal by the Secretary of the Board, or within any extension of time as established by the Chairman, the Board shall issue a decision allowing, in whole or in part, or disallowing the petitioner's appeal. The decision by the Board shall be in writing, stating the reasons for the decision, and shall constitute a final agency action for purposes of chapter 7 of title 5 of the United States Code. Failure by the Board to issue a decision on an appeal within the 90-day period or within any extension of time as established by the Chairman shall be deemed to be a denial of the appeal.
( c ) *Extension of time.* In the discretion of the Chairman, the time frame for the Board's decision may be extended as the Chairman may consider necessary or appropriate for a full and fair consideration of the issues. For purposes of this paragraph (c), the Special Counsel is authorized to act on behalf of the Chairman and may, in that capacity, grant an extension of time.
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.38 Recommended decision and filing of record. ( a ) *Filing of recommended decision and record.* Within 45 days after expiration of the time allowed for filing reply briefs under § 747.37(b), the ALJ will file with and certify to the NCUA Board, for decision, the record of the proceeding. The record must include the ALJ's recommended decision, recommended findings of fact, recommended conclusions of law, and proposed order; all prehearing and hearing transcripts, exhibits, and rulings; and the motions, briefs, memoranda, and other supporting papers filed in connection with the hearing. The ALJ will serve upon each party the recommended decision, findings, conclusions, and proposed order.
( b ) *Filing of index.* At the same time the ALJ files with and certifies to the NCUA Board for final determination the record of the proceeding, the ALJ will furnish to the NCUA Board a certified index of the entire record of the proceeding. The certified index must include, at a minimum, an entry for each paper, document, or motion filed with the ALJ in the proceeding, the date of the filing, and the identity of the filer. The certified index must also include an exhibit index containing, at a minimum, an entry consisting of exhibit number and title or description for: each exhibit introduced and admitted into evidence at the hearing; each exhibit introduced but not admitted into evidence at the hearing; each exhibit introduced and admitted into evidence after the completion of the hearing; and each exhibit introduced but not admitted into evidence after the completion of the hearing.
#### The Heard National Bank, a Corporation, Appellant, v. P. D. Cassidey and James R. Collins, Appellees.

Appeal from orders of the Circuit Court for the County of Duval.

W. S. Jennings, for Appellant.

Powell & Pelot, for Appellees.

Appeal dismissed on motion of respective parties on April 1st, 1913.
Editorial Note on Part 708b
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 708b appear at 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019, and at 85 FR 62213, Oct. 2, 2020.

§ 708b.103 Preparation of merger plan. ( a ) Upon the approval of a proposition for merger by the boards of directors of the credit unions, the two credit unions must prepare a plan for the proposed merger that includes: ( 1 ) Current financial statements for both credit unions;
( 2 ) Current delinquent loan summaries and analyses of the adequacy of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses account;
( 3 ) Consolidated financial statements, including an assessment of the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) net worth of each credit union before the merger and the GAAP net worth of the continuing credit union after the merger;
( 4 ) Analyses of share values;
( 5 ) Explanation of any proposed share adjustments, and where the net worth ratio of the merging credit union is more than 500 basis points higher than the net worth ratio of the continuing credit union, an explanation of the factors considered in establishing the amount of any proposed adjustment or in determining no adjustment is necessary;
( 6 ) Explanation of any provisions for reserves, undivided earnings or dividends;
( 7 ) Description of any merger-related financial arrangement, as defined in § 708b.2;
( 8 ) Provisions with respect to notification and payment of creditors;
( 9 ) Explanation of any changes relative to insurance such as life savings and loan protection insurance and insurance of member accounts;
( 10 ) Provisions for determining that all assets and liabilities of the continuing credit union will conform with the requirements of the Act (where the continuing credit union is a federal credit union); and
( 11 ) Proposed charter amendments (where the continuing credit union is a federal credit union). These amendments, if any, will usually pertain to the name of the credit union and the definition of its field of membership.
( b ) [Reserved]
[70 FR 3288, Jan. 24, 2005, as amended at 75 FR 81394, Dec. 28, 2010]
Exhibit 99.16





CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON








Golden Star Resources Ltd.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Golden Star Resources Ltd.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





I hereby consent to (i) being named and identified as a “qualified person” in connection with the following documents, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Form 40-F”) of Golden Star Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) to which this consent relates: (A) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016, (B) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2016, (C) the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on a Feasibility Study of the Wassa Open Pit Mine and Underground Project in Ghana" effective date December 31, 2014 and filed on May 8, 2015, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from such documents in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-211926, 333-175542, 333-169047, 333-118958, 333-105821 and 333-105820), as amended, and Registration Statement No. 333-196906 on Form F-10, as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.














/s/ Paul Riley


Paul Riley





March 30, 2017
§ 7.2024 Staggered terms for national bank directors and size of bank board. ( a ) *Staggered terms.* Any national bank may adopt bylaws that provide for staggering the terms of its directors. National banks must provide the OCC with copies of any bylaws so amended.
( b ) *Maximum term.* Any national bank director may hold office for a term that does not exceed three years.
( c ) *Number of directors.* A national bank's board of directors must consist of no fewer than 5 and no more than 25 members. A national bank may, after notice to the OCC, increase the size of its board of directors above the 25 member limit. A national bank seeking to increase the number of its directors must notify the OCC any time the proposed size would exceed 25 directors. The bank's notice must specify the reason(s) for the increase in the size of the board of directors beyond the statutory limit.
[68 FR 70131, Dec. 17, 2003, as amended at 85 FR 83736, Dec. 22, 2020]
#### Manry *v.*Farmers Bank of Forsyth.

No. 9016.

November 17, 1932.

Him, J.

The verdict directed was the only one which could legally have been found under the pleadings and the evidence; and the court did not err in refusing' an injunction and in overruling the motion for new trial. This case is distinguishable from *Doyal*v. *Moultrie Banking Co.,*163 *Ga.*140 (135 S. E. 501), and *McDuffie*v. *Merchants Bank,*168 *Ga.*231 (147 S. E. 111), which rested upon a different basis.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*906
      *B. H. Manry,*for plaintiff.

*Willingham & Willingham,*for defendant.
#### Eady *et al. v.*Magnolia Cemetery Company *et al.*

Gilbert, J.

Where the judge’s certificate to a bill of exceptions verifies it in part only, and shows it to be in part untrue, the certificate is not a lawful one, and the writ of error must be dismissed. *Hawkins*v. *Americus,*102 *Ga.*786 (30 S. E. 519); *Fort*v. *Sheffield,*108 *Ga.*781 (33 *788S. E. 660); *Jarriel*v. *Jarriel,*115 *Ga.*23 (41 S. E. 262); *Priester*v. *Bray,*138 *Ga.*69 (74 S. E. 757); *Central of Ga. Ry. Co.*v. *Mills,*143 *Ga.*47 (84 S. E. 120); *Love*v. *Love,*146 *Ga.*160 (91 S. E. 27); *Adamson*v. *Bradley,*147 *Ga.*328 (93 S. E. 894). The certificate to the bill of exceptions in the present case is fatally defective, in the light of the foregoing decisions.

No. 9162.

October 12, 1932.

*Spence & Spence,*for plaintiffs.

*T. M. Smith*and *J. V. Poole,*for defendants.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., absent.*
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1124

In re: JOSEPH HUSSELL; A.H. , Petitioners

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 2:19

- cv
- 00101 )

Submitted : March 10, 2020 Decided: March 13, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Joseph Hussell ; A.H., Petitioners Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Hussell , on behalf of himself and a minor, A.H. , petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018 ). He seeks an order from this court directing the
distr ict court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the magistrate judge assigned to Hussell’s case entered his proposed findings and recommendation regarding Hussell’s petition for habeas corpus on February 14, 2020. Accordingly, be cause the district court has acted in Hussell’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED