# Official Journal C 106/21 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 106 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5921 March 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 106

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5921 March 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2016/C 106/1 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2016/C 106/1

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2016/C 106/2 | Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 February 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom, Finanzgericht München — Germany) — C & J Clark International Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (C-659/13), Puma SE v Hauptzollamt Nürnberg (C-34/14) (References for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Dumping — Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Validity of Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 — WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Article 2(7) — Determination of dumping — Imports from non market economy countries — Claims for market economy treatment — Time limit — Article 9(5) and (6) — Claims for individual treatment — Article 17 — Sampling — Article 3(1), (5) and (6), Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) — Cooperation of the Union industry — Article 3(2) and (7) — Determination of injury — Other known factors — Community Customs Code — Article 236(1) and (2) — Repayment of duties not legally owed — Time limit — Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure — Invalidity of a regulation which imposed anti-dumping duties) | 2 |
| 2016/C 106/3 | Case C-50/14: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 January 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte — Italy) — Consorzio Artigiano Servizio Taxi e Autonoleggio (CASTA) and Others v Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Ciriè, Chivasso e Ivrea (ASL TO4), Regione Piemonte (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public contracts — Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU — Directive 2004/18/CE — Medical transport services — National legislation authorising regional health authorities to entrust medical transport activities to registered voluntary associations fulfilling the legal requirements, directly and without advertising, by means of reimbursement of the expenditure incurred — Lawfulness) | 3 |
| 2016/C 106/4 | Joined Cases C-283/14 and C-284/14: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 January 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf, Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — CM Eurologistik GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg (C-283/14), Grünwald Logistik Service GmbH (GLS) v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt (C-284/14) (References for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 158/2013 — Validity — Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits originating in China — Effect to be given to a judgment having found a preceding regulation to be invalid — Reopening of the initial investigation to determine the normal value — Reimposition of the anti-dumping duty on the basis of the same data — Investigation period to be taken into account) | 4 |
| 2016/C 106/5 | Case C-336/14: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Sonthofen — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against Sebat Ince (Freedom to provide services — Article 56 TFEU — Games of chance — Public monopoly on betting on sporting competitions — Prior administrative authorisation — Exclusion of private operators — Collection of bets on behalf of an operator established in another Member State — Criminal penalties — National provision contrary to EU law — Exclusion — Transition to a system providing for the grant of a limited number of licences to private operators — Principles of transparency and impartiality — Directive 98/34/EC — Article 8 — Technical regulations — Rules on services — Obligation to notify) | 5 |
| 2016/C 106/6 | Case C-375/14: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 January 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Frosinone — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Rosanna Laezza (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Betting and gaming — Judgment of the Court of Justice which declared the national rules on licences for the collection of bets incompatible with EU law — Reorganisation of the system by way of a new call for tenders — Free-of-charge transfer of the rights to use tangible and intangible assets owned by licensees and which constitute their network for the management and collection of bets. — Restriction — Overriding reasons in the public interest — Proportionality) | 6 |
| 2016/C 106/7 | Case C-398/14: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 January 2016 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 91/271/EEC — Urban waste water treatment — Article 4 — Secondary treatment or equivalent — Annex I, Sections B and D) | 6 |
| 2016/C 106/8 | Case C-415/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 January 2016 — Quimitéchnica.com — Comércio e Indústria Química, SA, José de Mello — Sociedade Gestora de Participações Sociais, SA v European Commission (Appeal — Cartels — European market in phosphates for animal feed — Fine imposed on the appellants following a settlement procedure — Payment of the fine in instalments — Requirement to provide a bank guarantee at a bank with a long-term ‘AA’ credit rating — Duty to state reasons) | 7 |
| 2016/C 106/9 | Case C-514/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 January 2016 — Éditions Odile Jacob SAS v European Commission, Lagardère SCA, Wendel (Appeal — Merger of undertakings in the book publishing market — Decision adopted following the annulment of a decision approving the purchaser of certain assets for lack of independence of an agent — Article 266 TFEU — Enforcement of the judgment ordering annulment — Subject matter of proceedings — Legal basis for the decision at issue — Retroactive effect of that decision — Independence of the purchaser of the assets sold vis-à-vis the seller) | 7 |
| 2016/C 106/10 | Case C-61/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber Chamber) of 28 January 2016 — Heli-Flight GmbH & Co. KG v European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (Appeal — Civil aviation — Application for approval of flight conditions presented — Decision of the European Aviation Safety Agency — Rejection of an application — Compulsory preliminary administrative procedure — Possibility of an action before the court of the Union European — Role of the court — Adoption of measures of organisation of procedure — Obligation — Complex technical assessments) | 8 |
| 2016/C 106/11 | Case C-64/15: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 January 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — BP Europa SE v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — General arrangements for excise duty — Directive 2008/118/EC — Occurrence of an irregularity during a movement of excise goods — Movement of goods under a duty suspension arrangement — Goods missing on delivery — Levying of excise duty in the absence of proof of destruction or loss of the goods) | 8 |
| 2016/C 106/12 | Case C-163/15: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Youssef Hassan v Breiding Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 23 — Licence — Register of Community trade marks — Right of the licensee to bring proceedings for infringement notwithstanding the fact that the licence has not been entered in the Register) | 9 |
| 2016/C 106/13 | Case C-666/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Holland (Netherlands) lodged on 14 December 2015 — X, GoPro Coöperatief UA v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Douane, kantoor Rotterdam Rijnmond | 10 |
| 2016/C 106/14 | Case C-667/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 14 December 2015 — Loterie Nationale — Nationale Loterij NV v Paul Adriaensen and Others | 10 |
| 2016/C 106/15 | Case C-673/15 P: Appeal brought on 15 December 2015 by The Tea Board against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 2 October 2015 in Case T-624/13: The Tea Board v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | 11 |
| 2016/C 106/16 | Case C-674/15 P: Appeal brought on 15 December 2015 by The Tea Board against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 2 October 2015 in Case T-625/13: The Tea Board v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | 13 |
| 2016/C 106/17 | Case C-675/15 P: Appeal brought on 15 December 2015 by The Tea Board against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 2 October 2015 in Case T-626/13: The Tea Board v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | 15 |
| 2016/C 106/18 | Case C-676/15 P: Appeal brought on 15 December 2015 by The Tea Board against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 2 October 2015 in Case T-627/13: The Tea Board v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | 16 |
| 2016/C 106/19 | Case C-678/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 16 December 2015 — Mohammad Zadeh Khorassani v Kathrin Pflanz | 18 |
| 2016/C 106/20 | Case C-688/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 21 December 2015 — Agnieška Anisimovienė and Others | 19 |
| 2016/C 106/21 | Case C-691/15 P: Appeal brought on 17 December 2015 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 7 October 2015 in Case T-689/13: Bilbaína de Alquitranes e.a. v Commission | 20 |
| 2016/C 106/22 | Case C-692/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 21 December 2015 — Security Service Srl v Ministero dell’Interno and Others | 21 |
| 2016/C 106/23 | Case C-693/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 21 December 2015 — Il Camaleonte Srl v Questore di Napoli, Ministero dell’Interno | 22 |
| 2016/C 106/24 | Case C-694/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 21 December 2015 — Vigilanza Privata Turris Srl v Questore di Napoli | 23 |
| 2016/C 106/25 | Case C-697/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte (Italy) lodged on 28 December 2015 — MB srl v Società Metropolitana Acque Torino (SMAT) | 24 |
| 2016/C 106/26 | Case C-6/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 6 January 2016 — Holcim France SAS, successor in law to Euro Stockage v Ministre des finances et des comptes publics | 24 |
| 2016/C 106/27 | Case C-14/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 11 January 2016 — Euro Park Service, having assumed the rights and obligations of Cairnbulg Nanteuil v Ministre des finances et des comptes publics | 25 |
| 2016/C 106/28 | Case C-19/16 P: Appeal brought on 13 January 2016 by Al-Bashir Mohammed Al-Faqih, Ghunia Abdrabbah, Taher Nasuf, Sanabel Relief Agency Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 28 October 2015 in Case T-134/11: Al-Bashir Mohammed Al-Faqih, Ghunia Abdrabbah, Taher Nasuf, Sanabel Relief Agency Ltd v European Commission | 26 |
| 2016/C 106/29 | Case C-38/16: Reference for a preliminary ruling from First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 25 January 2016 — Compass Contract Services Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs | 27 |
| 2016/C 106/30 | Case C-61/16 P: Appeal brought on 4 February 2016 by European Bicycle Manufacturers Association against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2015 in Case T-425/13: Giant (China) Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union | 28 |
| | General Court |
| 2016/C 106/31 | Case T-620/11: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2016 — GFKL Financial Services v Commission (State aid — German tax legislation concerning loss carry-forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Individual concern — Admissibility — Concept of State aid — Selectivity — Nature and general scheme of the tax system — State resources — Obligation to state reasons — Legitimate expectations) | 29 |
| 2016/C 106/32 | Case T-562/13: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2016 — Isotis v Commission (Arbitration clause — Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme — REACH112 contract — Reimbursement of sums advanced — Eligible costs) | 29 |
| 2016/C 106/33 | Case T-676/13: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2016 — Italian International Film v EACEA (Support programme for the European audiovisual sector (MEDIA 2007) — Measures of support for the transnational distribution of European films — Call for proposals in connection with the ‘selective’ scheme 2013 — EACEA act informing the applicant of the rejection of its application for the film ‘Only God Forgives’ — EACEA act confirming the rejection but stating new reasons — Powers — Distribution of tasks between the Commission and the EACEA — Circumscribed powers — Actions for annulment — Challengeable act — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Permanent Guidelines 2012-2013 — Material or physical distribution agreement — Not communicated in advance to the EACEA — Application not eligible) | 30 |
| 2016/C 106/34 | Case T-135/14: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2016 — Kicktipp v OHIM — Società Italiana Calzature (kicktipp) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark kicktipp — Earlier national word mark KICKERS — Rule 19 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rule 98(1) of Regulation No 2868/95 — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 31 |
| 2016/C 106/35 | Case T-247/14: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2016 — Meica v OHIM — Salumificio Fratelli Beretta (STICK MiniMINI Beretta) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark STICK MiniMINI Beretta — Earlier Community word mark MINI WINI — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96) | 32 |
| 2016/C 106/36 | Case T-686/14: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2016 — Italy v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — EAGGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Fruit and vegetables — Tomato processing sector — Aid to producer organisations — Expenditure incurred by Italy — Proportionality — Res judicata) | 32 |
| 2016/C 106/37 | Case T-722/14: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2016 — PRIMA v Commission (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Support for the European Commission representative in Bulgaria in the context of the organization of public events — Rejection of tender submitted by a tenderer and award of the contract to another tenderer — Award criteria — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of relative advantages of the successful tender — Transparency) | 33 |
| 2016/C 106/38 | Case T-842/14: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2016 — Airpressure Bodyforming v OHIM (Slim legs by airpressure bodyforming) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark Slim legs by airpressure bodyforming — Refusal of registration by the examiner — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 34 |
| 2016/C 106/39 | Case T-797/14: Order of the General Court of 28 December 2015 — Skype v OHIM — Sky International (SKYPE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate) | 34 |
| 2016/C 106/40 | Case T-277/15: Order of the General Court of 26 January 2016 — Permapore v OHIM — José Joaquim Oliveira II — Jardins & Afins (Terraway) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Terraway — Earlier national and international word marks TERRAWAY — Partial rejection of the opposition — Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the period prescribed — Decision of the Board of Appeal declaring that the appeal is deemed not to have been filed — Action manifestly lacking any basis in law) | 35 |
| 2016/C 106/41 | Case T-618/15: Action brought on 31 July 2015 — Voigt v Parliament | 35 |
| 2016/C 106/42 | Case T-20/16: Action brought on 21 January 2016 — Indeutsch International v OHIM — Crafts Americana (Representation of repeated curves between parallel lines) | 36 |
| 2016/C 106/43 | Case T-22/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções and Others v ECB | 37 |
| 2016/C 106/44 | Case T-24/16: Action brought on 21 January 2016 — Sovena Portugal — Consumer Goods v OHIM — Mueloliva (FONTOLIVA) | 38 |
| 2016/C 106/45 | Case T-25/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Haw Par v OHIM — Cosmowell (GelenkGold) | 39 |
| 2016/C 106/46 | Case T-29/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Caffè Nero Group v OHIM (CAFFÈ NERO) | 39 |
| 2016/C 106/47 | Case T-30/16: Action brought on 26 January 2016 — M.I. Industries v OHIM — Natural Instinct (Natural Instinct Dog and Cat food as nature intended) | 40 |
| 2016/C 106/48 | Case T-31/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — adp Gauselmann v OHIM (Juwel) | 41 |
| 2016/C 106/49 | Case T-35/16: Action brought on 21 January 2016 — Sony Computer Entertainment Europe v OHIM — Vieta Audio (Vita) | 42 |
| 2016/C 106/50 | Case T-37/16: Action brought on 26 January 2016 — Caffè Nero Group v OHIM (CAFFÈ NERO) | 42 |
| 2016/C 106/51 | Case T-39/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Fink (NANA FINK) | 43 |
| 2016/C 106/52 | Case T-43/16: Action brought on 29 January 2016 — 1&1 Telecom v Commission | 44 |
| 2016/C 106/53 | Case T-49/16: Action brought on 1 February 2016 — Azanta v OHIM — Novartis (NIMORAL) | 45 |
| 2016/C 106/54 | Case T-55/16 P: Appeal brought on 9 February 2016 by Carlo De Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-45/11, De Nicola v EIB | 45 |
| 2016/C 106/55 | Case T-540/14: Order of the General Court of 19 January 2016 — Klass v OHIM — F. Smit (PLAYSEAT and PLAYSEATS) | 46 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2016/C 106/56 | Case F-96/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 February 2016 –Bulté and Krempa v Commission (Civil service — Surviving dependants of a deceased former official — Pensions — Survivors’ pensions — Article 85 of the Staff Regulations — Recovery of overpayment — No due reason for the payment — Patent irregularity — None) | 47 |
| 2016/C 106/57 | Case F-137/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 February 2016 — GV v EEAS (Civil service — EEAS staff — Member of the contract staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Article 47(c) of the CEOS — Reasons for dismissal — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Right to be heard — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Principle of sound administration — Material damage — Non-material damage) | 47 |
| 2016/C 106/58 | Case F-56/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 February 2016 –Barnett and Mogensen v Commission (Civil service — Retired officials — Retirement pensions — Article 64 of the Staff Regulations — Weightings — Annual update of weightings — Article 65(2) of the Staff Regulations — Interim update — Articles 3, 4 and 8 of Annex XI to the Staff Regulations — Sensitivity threshold — Change in the cost of living — Article 65(4) of the Staff Regulations — Decision by the legislature not to update the weightings for 2013 and 2014 — Scope — Regulation No 1416/2013 — Over-estimation of the weighting for Denmark — Reduction of the weighting through the interim update mechanism — Misuse of powers) | 48 |
| 2016/C 106/59 | Case F-62/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 February 2016 –Clausen and Kristoffersen v Parliament (Civil service — Retired officials — Retirement pensions — Article 64 of the Staff Regulations — Weightings — Annual update of weightings — Article 65(2) of the Staff Regulations — Interim update — Articles 3, 4 and 8 of Annex XI to the Staff Regulations — Sensitivity threshold — Change in the cost of living — Article 65(4) of the Staff Regulations — Decision by the legislature not to update the weightings for 2013 and 2014 — Scope — Regulation No 1416/2013 — Over-estimation of the weighting for Denmark — Reduction of the weighting through the interim update mechanism — Misuse of powers) | 49 |
| 2016/C 106/60 | Case F-66/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 February 2016 — Barnett, Ditlevsen and Madsen v EESC (Civil service — Retired officials — Retirement pensions — Article 64 of the Staff Regulations — Weightings — Annual update of weightings — Article 65(2) of the Staff Regulations — Interim update — Articles 3, 4 and 8 of Annex XI to the Staff Regulations — Sensitivity threshold — Change in the cost of living — Article 65(4) of the Staff Regulations — Decision by the legislature not to update the weightings for 2013 and 2014 — Scope — Regulation No 1416/2013 — Over-estimation of the weighting for Denmark — Reduction of the weighting through the interim update mechanism — Misuse of powers) | 50 |
| 2016/C 106/61 | Case F-107/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2016 — Fedtke v EESC (Civil Service — Officials — Automatic retirement — Retirement age — Application to remain in service beyond the age limit — Second paragraph of Article 52 of the Staff Regulations — Interest of the service — Article 82 of the Rules of Procedure — Absolute bar to proceeding — Irregularity of the pre-litigation procedure) | 50 |
| 2016/C 106/62 | Case F-2/16: Action brought on 11 January 2016 — ZZ v EEAS | 51 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2016/C 106/2

Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 February 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom, Finanzgericht München — Germany) — C & J Clark International Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (C-659/13), Puma SE v Hauptzollamt Nürnberg (C-34/14) (References for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Dumping — Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Validity of Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 — WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Article 2(7) — Determination of dumping — Imports from non market economy countries — Claims for market economy treatment — Time limit — Article 9(5) and (6) — Claims for individual treatment — Article 17 — Sampling — Article 3(1), (5) and (6), Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) — Cooperation of the Union industry — Article 3(2) and (7) — Determination of injury — Other known factors — Community Customs Code — Article 236(1) and (2) — Repayment of duties not legally owed — Time limit — Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure — Invalidity of a regulation which imposed anti-dumping duties)

2

2016/C 106/3

Case C-50/14: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 January 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte — Italy) — Consorzio Artigiano Servizio Taxi e Autonoleggio (CASTA) and Others v Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Ciriè, Chivasso e Ivrea (ASL TO4), Regione Piemonte (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public contracts — Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU — Directive 2004/18/CE — Medical transport services — National legislation authorising regional health authorities to entrust medical transport activities to registered voluntary associations fulfilling the legal requirements, directly and without advertising, by means of reimbursement of the expenditure incurred — Lawfulness)

3

2016/C 106/4

Joined Cases C-283/14 and C-284/14: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 January 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf, Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — CM Eurologistik GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg (C-283/14), Grünwald Logistik Service GmbH (GLS) v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt (C-284/14) (References for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 158/2013 — Validity — Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits originating in China — Effect to be given to a judgment having found a preceding regulation to be invalid — Reopening of the initial investigation to determine the normal value — Reimposition of the anti-dumping duty on the basis of the same data — Investigation period to be taken into account)

4

2016/C 106/5

Case C-336/14: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Sonthofen — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against Sebat Ince (Freedom to provide services — Article 56 TFEU — Games of chance — Public monopoly on betting on sporting competitions — Prior administrative authorisation — Exclusion of private operators — Collection of bets on behalf of an operator established in another Member State — Criminal penalties — National provision contrary to EU law — Exclusion — Transition to a system providing for the grant of a limited number of licences to private operators — Principles of transparency and impartiality — Directive 98/34/EC — Article 8 — Technical regulations — Rules on services — Obligation to notify)

5

2016/C 106/6

Case C-375/14: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 January 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Frosinone — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Rosanna Laezza (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Betting and gaming — Judgment of the Court of Justice which declared the national rules on licences for the collection of bets incompatible with EU law — Reorganisation of the system by way of a new call for tenders — Free-of-charge transfer of the rights to use tangible and intangible assets owned by licensees and which constitute their network for the management and collection of bets. — Restriction — Overriding reasons in the public interest — Proportionality)

6

2016/C 106/7

Case C-398/14: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 January 2016 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 91/271/EEC — Urban waste water treatment — Article 4 — Secondary treatment or equivalent — Annex I, Sections B and D)

6

2016/C 106/8

Case C-415/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 January 2016 — Quimitéchnica.com — Comércio e Indústria Química, SA, José de Mello — Sociedade Gestora de Participações Sociais, SA v European Commission (Appeal — Cartels — European market in phosphates for animal feed — Fine imposed on the appellants following a settlement procedure — Payment of the fine in instalments — Requirement to provide a bank guarantee at a bank with a long-term ‘AA’ credit rating — Duty to state reasons)

7

2016/C 106/9

Case C-514/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 January 2016 — Éditions Odile Jacob SAS v European Commission, Lagardère SCA, Wendel (Appeal — Merger of undertakings in the book publishing market — Decision adopted following the annulment of a decision approving the purchaser of certain assets for lack of independence of an agent — Article 266 TFEU — Enforcement of the judgment ordering annulment — Subject matter of proceedings — Legal basis for the decision at issue — Retroactive effect of that decision — Independence of the purchaser of the assets sold vis-à-vis the seller)

7

2016/C 106/10

Case C-61/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber Chamber) of 28 January 2016 — Heli-Flight GmbH & Co. KG v European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (Appeal — Civil aviation — Application for approval of flight conditions presented — Decision of the European Aviation Safety Agency — Rejection of an application — Compulsory preliminary administrative procedure — Possibility of an action before the court of the Union European — Role of the court — Adoption of measures of organisation of procedure — Obligation — Complex technical assessments)

8

2016/C 106/11

Case C-64/15: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 January 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — BP Europa SE v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — General arrangements for excise duty — Directive 2008/118/EC — Occurrence of an irregularity during a movement of excise goods — Movement of goods under a duty suspension arrangement — Goods missing on delivery — Levying of excise duty in the absence of proof of destruction or loss of the goods)

8

2016/C 106/12

Case C-163/15: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Youssef Hassan v Breiding Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 23 — Licence — Register of Community trade marks — Right of the licensee to bring proceedings for infringement notwithstanding the fact that the licence has not been entered in the Register)

9

2016/C 106/13

Case C-666/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Holland (Netherlands) lodged on 14 December 2015 — X, GoPro Coöperatief UA v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Douane, kantoor Rotterdam Rijnmond

10

2016/C 106/14

Case C-667/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 14 December 2015 — Loterie Nationale — Nationale Loterij NV v Paul Adriaensen and Others

10

2016/C 106/15

Case C-673/15 P: Appeal brought on 15 December 2015 by The Tea Board against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 2 October 2015 in Case T-624/13: The Tea Board v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

11

2016/C 106/16

Case C-674/15 P: Appeal brought on 15 December 2015 by The Tea Board against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 2 October 2015 in Case T-625/13: The Tea Board v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

13

2016/C 106/17

Case C-675/15 P: Appeal brought on 15 December 2015 by The Tea Board against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 2 October 2015 in Case T-626/13: The Tea Board v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

15

2016/C 106/18

Case C-676/15 P: Appeal brought on 15 December 2015 by The Tea Board against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 2 October 2015 in Case T-627/13: The Tea Board v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

16

2016/C 106/19

Case C-678/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 16 December 2015 — Mohammad Zadeh Khorassani v Kathrin Pflanz

18

2016/C 106/20

Case C-688/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 21 December 2015 — Agnieška Anisimovienė and Others

19

2016/C 106/21

Case C-691/15 P: Appeal brought on 17 December 2015 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 7 October 2015 in Case T-689/13: Bilbaína de Alquitranes e.a. v Commission

20

2016/C 106/22

Case C-692/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 21 December 2015 — Security Service Srl v Ministero dell’Interno and Others

21

2016/C 106/23

Case C-693/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 21 December 2015 — Il Camaleonte Srl v Questore di Napoli, Ministero dell’Interno

22

2016/C 106/24

Case C-694/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 21 December 2015 — Vigilanza Privata Turris Srl v Questore di Napoli

23

2016/C 106/25

Case C-697/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte (Italy) lodged on 28 December 2015 — MB srl v Società Metropolitana Acque Torino (SMAT)

24

2016/C 106/26

Case C-6/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 6 January 2016 — Holcim France SAS, successor in law to Euro Stockage v Ministre des finances et des comptes publics

24

2016/C 106/27

Case C-14/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 11 January 2016 — Euro Park Service, having assumed the rights and obligations of Cairnbulg Nanteuil v Ministre des finances et des comptes publics

25

2016/C 106/28

Case C-19/16 P: Appeal brought on 13 January 2016 by Al-Bashir Mohammed Al-Faqih, Ghunia Abdrabbah, Taher Nasuf, Sanabel Relief Agency Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 28 October 2015 in Case T-134/11: Al-Bashir Mohammed Al-Faqih, Ghunia Abdrabbah, Taher Nasuf, Sanabel Relief Agency Ltd v European Commission

26

2016/C 106/29

Case C-38/16: Reference for a preliminary ruling from First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 25 January 2016 — Compass Contract Services Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs

27

2016/C 106/30

Case C-61/16 P: Appeal brought on 4 February 2016 by European Bicycle Manufacturers Association against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2015 in Case T-425/13: Giant (China) Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union

28

General Court

2016/C 106/31

Case T-620/11: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2016 — GFKL Financial Services v Commission (State aid — German tax legislation concerning loss carry-forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Individual concern — Admissibility — Concept of State aid — Selectivity — Nature and general scheme of the tax system — State resources — Obligation to state reasons — Legitimate expectations)

29

2016/C 106/32

Case T-562/13: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2016 — Isotis v Commission (Arbitration clause — Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme — REACH112 contract — Reimbursement of sums advanced — Eligible costs)

29

2016/C 106/33

Case T-676/13: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2016 — Italian International Film v EACEA (Support programme for the European audiovisual sector (MEDIA 2007) — Measures of support for the transnational distribution of European films — Call for proposals in connection with the ‘selective’ scheme 2013 — EACEA act informing the applicant of the rejection of its application for the film ‘Only God Forgives’ — EACEA act confirming the rejection but stating new reasons — Powers — Distribution of tasks between the Commission and the EACEA — Circumscribed powers — Actions for annulment — Challengeable act — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Permanent Guidelines 2012-2013 — Material or physical distribution agreement — Not communicated in advance to the EACEA — Application not eligible)

30

2016/C 106/34

Case T-135/14: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2016 — Kicktipp v OHIM — Società Italiana Calzature (kicktipp) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark kicktipp — Earlier national word mark KICKERS — Rule 19 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rule 98(1) of Regulation No 2868/95 — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

31

2016/C 106/35

Case T-247/14: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2016 — Meica v OHIM — Salumificio Fratelli Beretta (STICK MiniMINI Beretta) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark STICK MiniMINI Beretta — Earlier Community word mark MINI WINI — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96)

32

2016/C 106/36

Case T-686/14: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2016 — Italy v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — EAGGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Fruit and vegetables — Tomato processing sector — Aid to producer organisations — Expenditure incurred by Italy — Proportionality — Res judicata)

32

2016/C 106/37

Case T-722/14: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2016 — PRIMA v Commission (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Support for the European Commission representative in Bulgaria in the context of the organization of public events — Rejection of tender submitted by a tenderer and award of the contract to another tenderer — Award criteria — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of relative advantages of the successful tender — Transparency)

33

2016/C 106/38

Case T-842/14: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2016 — Airpressure Bodyforming v OHIM (Slim legs by airpressure bodyforming) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark Slim legs by airpressure bodyforming — Refusal of registration by the examiner — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

34

2016/C 106/39

Case T-797/14: Order of the General Court of 28 December 2015 — Skype v OHIM — Sky International (SKYPE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)

34

2016/C 106/40

Case T-277/15: Order of the General Court of 26 January 2016 — Permapore v OHIM — José Joaquim Oliveira II — Jardins & Afins (Terraway) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Terraway — Earlier national and international word marks TERRAWAY — Partial rejection of the opposition — Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the period prescribed — Decision of the Board of Appeal declaring that the appeal is deemed not to have been filed — Action manifestly lacking any basis in law)

35

2016/C 106/41

Case T-618/15: Action brought on 31 July 2015 — Voigt v Parliament

35

2016/C 106/42

Case T-20/16: Action brought on 21 January 2016 — Indeutsch International v OHIM — Crafts Americana (Representation of repeated curves between parallel lines)

36

2016/C 106/43

Case T-22/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções and Others v ECB

37

2016/C 106/44

Case T-24/16: Action brought on 21 January 2016 — Sovena Portugal — Consumer Goods v OHIM — Mueloliva (FONTOLIVA)

38

2016/C 106/45

Case T-25/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Haw Par v OHIM — Cosmowell (GelenkGold)

39

2016/C 106/46

Case T-29/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Caffè Nero Group v OHIM (CAFFÈ NERO)

39

2016/C 106/47

Case T-30/16: Action brought on 26 January 2016 — M.I. Industries v OHIM — Natural Instinct (Natural Instinct Dog and Cat food as nature intended)

40

2016/C 106/48

Case T-31/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — adp Gauselmann v OHIM (Juwel)

41

2016/C 106/49

Case T-35/16: Action brought on 21 January 2016 — Sony Computer Entertainment Europe v OHIM — Vieta Audio (Vita)

42

2016/C 106/50

Case T-37/16: Action brought on 26 January 2016 — Caffè Nero Group v OHIM (CAFFÈ NERO)

42

2016/C 106/51

Case T-39/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Fink (NANA FINK)

43

2016/C 106/52

Case T-43/16: Action brought on 29 January 2016 — 1&1 Telecom v Commission

44

2016/C 106/53

Case T-49/16: Action brought on 1 February 2016 — Azanta v OHIM — Novartis (NIMORAL)

45

2016/C 106/54

Case T-55/16 P: Appeal brought on 9 February 2016 by Carlo De Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-45/11, De Nicola v EIB

De Nicola

EIB

45

2016/C 106/55

Case T-540/14: Order of the General Court of 19 January 2016 — Klass v OHIM — F. Smit (PLAYSEAT and PLAYSEATS)

46

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2016/C 106/56

Case F-96/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 February 2016 –Bulté and Krempa v Commission (Civil service — Surviving dependants of a deceased former official — Pensions — Survivors’ pensions — Article 85 of the Staff Regulations — Recovery of overpayment — No due reason for the payment — Patent irregularity — None)

47

2016/C 106/57

Case F-137/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 February 2016 — GV v EEAS (Civil service — EEAS staff — Member of the contract staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Article 47(c) of the CEOS — Reasons for dismissal — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Right to be heard — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Principle of sound administration — Material damage — Non-material damage)

47

2016/C 106/58

Case F-56/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 February 2016 –Barnett and Mogensen v Commission (Civil service — Retired officials — Retirement pensions — Article 64 of the Staff Regulations — Weightings — Annual update of weightings — Article 65(2) of the Staff Regulations — Interim update — Articles 3, 4 and 8 of Annex XI to the Staff Regulations — Sensitivity threshold — Change in the cost of living — Article 65(4) of the Staff Regulations — Decision by the legislature not to update the weightings for 2013 and 2014 — Scope — Regulation No 1416/2013 — Over-estimation of the weighting for Denmark — Reduction of the weighting through the interim update mechanism — Misuse of powers)

48

2016/C 106/59

Case F-62/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 February 2016 –Clausen and Kristoffersen v Parliament (Civil service — Retired officials — Retirement pensions — Article 64 of the Staff Regulations — Weightings — Annual update of weightings — Article 65(2) of the Staff Regulations — Interim update — Articles 3, 4 and 8 of Annex XI to the Staff Regulations — Sensitivity threshold — Change in the cost of living — Article 65(4) of the Staff Regulations — Decision by the legislature not to update the weightings for 2013 and 2014 — Scope — Regulation No 1416/2013 — Over-estimation of the weighting for Denmark — Reduction of the weighting through the interim update mechanism — Misuse of powers)

49

2016/C 106/60

Case F-66/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 February 2016 — Barnett, Ditlevsen and Madsen v EESC (Civil service — Retired officials — Retirement pensions — Article 64 of the Staff Regulations — Weightings — Annual update of weightings — Article 65(2) of the Staff Regulations — Interim update — Articles 3, 4 and 8 of Annex XI to the Staff Regulations — Sensitivity threshold — Change in the cost of living — Article 65(4) of the Staff Regulations — Decision by the legislature not to update the weightings for 2013 and 2014 — Scope — Regulation No 1416/2013 — Over-estimation of the weighting for Denmark — Reduction of the weighting through the interim update mechanism — Misuse of powers)

50

2016/C 106/61

Case F-107/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2016 — Fedtke v EESC (Civil Service — Officials — Automatic retirement — Retirement age — Application to remain in service beyond the age limit — Second paragraph of Article 52 of the Staff Regulations — Interest of the service — Article 82 of the Rules of Procedure — Absolute bar to proceeding — Irregularity of the pre-litigation procedure)

50

2016/C 106/62

Case F-2/16: Action brought on 11 January 2016 — ZZ v EEAS

51

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN