alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Woods Hole Science Center

##### U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1012

| **Title Page**IntroductionSettingMethodsResults DiscussionData CatalogAcknowledgmentsReferencesList of FiguresContactsDisclaimers | Geologic Interpretation and Multibeam Bathymetry of the Sea Floor in the Vicinity of the Race, Eastern Long Island Sound
**by L.J. Poppe1, M.L. DiGiacomo-Cohen2, E.F. Doran3, S.M. Smith4, H.F. Stewart4, andN.A. Forfinski4**

**1 Coastal and Marine Geology Program, U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 025432  Earth Surface Dynamics Program, U.S. Geological Survey, Avery Point, Groton, Connecticut 063403  Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Hartford, Connecticut 061064 Atlantic Hydrographic Branch, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Norfolk, Virginia 23510**

Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Skip Navigation
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey |		Coastal and Marine Geology		URL: cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/publications/of2007-1012/index.html		Page Contact Information: CMGDS Team		Page Last Modified: Wednesday, 06-Dec-2017 13:09:05 EST
# C_2011344EN.01001001.xml

| 24.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/10

---

COMPOSITION OF THE EFTA COURT

2011/C 344/07

Upon nomination by the Government of Iceland, Mr Páll Hreinsson was appointed as Judge of the EFTA Court by common accord of the three Contracting Parties to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice (the Surveillance and Court Agreement) for the period from 15 September 2011 to 31 December 2014, to succeed Mr Thorgeir Örlygsson. At a public sitting of the EFTA Court on 12 September 2011, Mr Páll Hreinsson took the oath prescribed in Protocol 5, Article 2 of the Surveillance and Court Agreement.

---
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 11.1

                          ALDILA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                  Twelve months ended
                                                                                      December 31,
                                                                   ---------------------------------------------------
                                                                        1999              1998              1997
                                                                   ---------------   ---------------    --------------
<S>                                                                <C>               <C>                <C>
BASIC:
Net income (loss)                                                        $ (2,105)          $ 2,799           $ 1,539

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                       15,462            15,452            15,625
                                                                   ---------------   ---------------    --------------

Net income (loss) per common share                                       $  (0.14)          $  0.18           $  0.10
                                                                   ===============   ===============    ==============



ASSUMING DILUTION:
Net income (loss)                                                        $ (2,105)          $ 2,799           $ 1,539

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                       15,462            15,452            15,625

The number of shares resulting from the assumed
exercise of stock options reduced by the number
of shares which could have been purchased with
the proceeds from such exercise, using the average
market price during the period                                                  -                67               113
                                                                   ---------------   ---------------    --------------

Weighted average number of common and
   common equivalent shares                                                15,462            15,519            15,738
                                                                   ---------------   ---------------    --------------

Net income (loss) per common share, assuming dilution                    $  (0.14)          $  0.18           $  0.10
                                                                   ===============   ===============    ==============

</TABLE>
07/15/2014 05:05 4252271007 

DAVID F. SHAYNE 

FAA OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL 

1601 LINDAVE.,SW 

RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 

TELEPHONE: (425)227,2165 

FACS.IMILE: (425) 227-1007 

ANM7 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA HEARING 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of: 

Joseph D. Barbera FAA Case No. 2013NM090056 

Judge Richard Goodwin 

PAGE 02/03 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION TO THE ALJ'S "ORDER ON 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTIONS" 

On or about July 14, 2014, the ALJ served on the parties the above-referenced Order 

essentially admonishing Respondent to comply with applicable procedural rules, and changing the 

discovery schedule. Neither of Complainant's substantive motions, (Motion for Reconsideration 

and Summary Judgment, filed on May 6, 2014), were addressed. 

Complainant hereby respectfully requests to be informed whether its motions are still u,tJder 

advisement or whether the pru:ties should treat the above-referenced Order as a de facto denial 

thereof. 

Respectfully submitted this IS'" day of July 2014. 

FAA v. Jo~eph .0- Barbera. 

Complainanfs Motion ror Clari.fication 

FAA Case No. 20l3NM090056 

Pagel of2 

DAVID F. S/o!:A,YNE, FAA. ATTORNEY 

TEL: (425) 227-2165; FAX: (425) 227-1007 
07/15/2014 05:05 4252271007 ANM7 I 

' 

CERTlFICATE OF SERVICE 

PAGE 03/03 

I hereby certifY that the foregoing COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FOR CLARJFICA TION has 

been served as designated by the recipient's name this date, to the following: 

Federal Aviation Administration-Facsimile and First Class Mail 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 

800 Independence A venue SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Fax: (202) 493-5142 

Joseph D Barbera- First Class and Return Receipt Requested Mail 

14706 NE Erickson Dr. 

La Center, WA 98629-4405 

Dated this 151

h day ofJuly 2014. 

FAA v. Joseph D. Barbera. 

Complainant's Motion for Clarification 

FAA CasoNo. 2013NM090056 

Page 2 of2 

Terri K' k , Office of Regional Counsel (ANM-7) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave. SW 

Renton, WA 98057 

(425) 227-2007 

DAVll:JF. SHAYNE. FAA ATTORNEY 

TEL: (425) 227-2165: FAX: (425) 227-1007 
07/15/2014 05:05 4252271007 ANM7 PAGE 01/03 

FACSIMILE MESSAGE 

DAVID .F. SHAYNE 

FEDERAL A VJATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL 

ANM-7 

1601 LIND AVENUE S.W. 

RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 

The infonn.ation contained in this facsimile message is legally privileged and confidential 

information and is intended only for the usc of the individual named on this cover sheet. 

If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 

use, dissemination, distribution, or copy of this facsimile is strictly prohibited. If you 

have received this facsimile in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at 

425-227-2007. 

DATE: .July 15, 2014 NO. PAGES: 3 including cover 

TO: Hearing Docket Clerk FROM: David F. Shayne 

FAX NO.: (202) 493-5142 FAX NO.: 425-227-1007 

.PHONE NO.: PHONE NO.: 

RE: Joseph I E.,.n, 

J Barbera 

Case No. 

20_l3NM090056
#### David Boas, Respondent, *v.*The Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, fifth district, borough of Manhattan.

*786H. A. Robinson, for appellant.,

J. M. Birnbaum, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

This appeal seems frivolous.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
output_EmissionLocation

FacilityID SourceID LocationType LongitudeLatitude UTMzone SourceType Lengthx Lengthy Angle HorzDim VertDim AreaVolReleaseHgt StackHgt_m StackDiameter_m ExitGasVel_m ExitGasTemp_K Elevation_m HillHeight Page 1
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




   EXHIBIT 4(c)  


 CERTIFICATE  



	CERTIFICATE NUMBER

PVA20000001	 	EFFECTIVE DATE

May 15, 2001
	
OWNER

John J. Doe	
 	
BIRTH DATE OF OWNER

November 5, 1953
	
JOINT OWNER

N/A	
 	
BIRTH DATE OF JOINT OWNER

N/A
	
ANNUITANT

John J. Doe	
 	
BIRTH DATE OF ANNUITANT

November 5, 1953
	
BENEFICIARY

As contained in our records	
 	
ANNUITY COMMENCEMENT DATE

November 5, 2043



CONTRACT HOLDER: {AmSouth Bank, N.A., as Trustee.} 


CLASS OF ELIGIBLE OWNERS: Account holders of Broker/Dealers with selling agreements with Protective Life Insurance Company, its subsidiaries or
its affiliates. 


JURISDICTION: This Contract is governed by the laws of the State of Alabama. 


INITIAL PURCHASE PAYMENT: {100,000.00} 



ANNUAL EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATE FOR THE FIXED ACCOUNT ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE: {4.00%} 


ANNUAL EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATE FOR DCA FIXED ACCOUNT 1 ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE: {5.00%} 


ANNUAL EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATE FOR DCA FIXED ACCOUNT 2 ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE: {4.50%} 


BENEFIT PACKAGE: {Standard} 


CONTRACT MAINTENANCE FEE: {$30} 

The contract maintenance fee is deducted prior to the Annuity Commencement Date on each Contract Anniversary, and on any day that the Contract is surrendered other than the Contract Anniversary. The
contract maintenance fee will be deducted from the Allocation Options in the same proportion as their values are to the Contract Value. The contract maintenance fee will be waived by the Company in
the event the Contract Value or the aggregate Purchase Payments reduced by surrenders equals or exceeds $50,000 on the date the contract maintenance fee is to be deducted. 


MORTALITY AND EXPENSE RISK CHARGE: {1.25%} per annum prior to the Annuity Commencement Date, and {1.25%} per annum on or after the Annuity
Commencement Date. 


ADMINISTRATION CHARGE: {0.15%} per annum. 


TRANSFER FEE: $25 per transfer in excess of 12 in any Contract Year. 


1





 
SURRENDER CHARGE  



	
 Number of Full Years Elapsed Between

the Effective Date and the Surrender Date
	
 	

Surrender Charge Percentage
	
 
	{0	}	{6	%}
	{1	}	{6	%}
	{2	}	{5	%}
	{3	}	{5	%}
	{4	}	{4	%}
	{5	+}	{0	%}




ALLOCATION OPTIONS AVAILABLE ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE  


{Protective Life Guaranteed Account}



{Fixed
Account}

{DCA Fixed Account 1}

{DCA Fixed Account 2} 




{Goldman Sachs/PIC}



{International
Equity}

{Small Cap Value}

{Capital Growth}

{CORE U.S. Equity}

{Growth and Income}

{Global Income} 




{Goldman Sachs}



{Internet
Tollkeeper} 




{Massachusetts Financial Services (MFS)}



{New
Discovery}

{Emerging Growth}

{Investors Growth Stock}

{Research}

{Utilities}

{Investors Trust}

{Total Return} 




{OppenheimerFunds}



{Global
Securities}

{Aggressive Growth}

{Capital Appreciation}

{Main Street Growth & Income}

{Strategic Bond}

{High Income}

{Money Fund} 




{Van Kampen}



{Emerging
Growth}

{Strategic Stock}

{Enterprise}

{Comstock}

{Growth and Income}

{Asset Allocation} 




{Calvert}



{Social
Small Cap Growth}

{Social Balanced} 




{Van Eck}



{Worldwide
Hard Assets}

{Worldwide Real Estate} 



2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.4

ARTICLE   5
LEGEND
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
STOLT-NIELSEN S.A. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
LEGEND
MULTIPLIER   1,000

<TABLE>
<S>                                          <C>
PERIOD-TYPE                                       12-MOS
FISCAL-YEAR-END                              NOV-30-2000
PERIOD-START                                 DEC-01-1999
PERIOD-END                                   NOV-30-2000
CASH                                              28,770
SECURITIES                                             0
RECEIVABLES                                      396,757
ALLOWANCES                                        12,455
INVENTORY                                        165,655
CURRENT-ASSETS                                   756,379
PP&E                                           3,662,610
DEPRECIATION                                   1,111,955
TOTAL-ASSETS                                   3,727,303
CURRENT-LIABILITIES                              803,305
BONDS                                          1,349,469
PREFERRED-MANDATORY                                    0
PREFERRED                                              0
COMMON                                            31,884
OTHER-SE                                       1,063,948
TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY                     3,727,303
SALES                                                  0
TOTAL-REVENUES                                 2,268,630
CGS                                                    0
TOTAL-COSTS                                    1,984,736
OTHER-EXPENSES                                         0
LOSS-PROVISION                                         0
INTEREST-EXPENSE                                 111,681
INCOME-PRETAX                                     35,488
INCOME-TAX                                        15,374
INCOME-CONTINUING                                 20,114
DISCONTINUED                                           0
EXTRAORDINARY                                          0
CHANGES                                                0
NET-INCOME                                        20,114
EPS-BASIC                                           0.37
EPS-DILUTED                                         0.36
</TABLE>
#### Ramsey *v.*Ramsey.

No. 8690.

September 14, 1932.

Atkinson, J.

1. The judgment upon which error was assigned was in effect the grant of an application for a receiver, which may be reviewed by a fast bill of exceptions. Civil Code, § 6153. See *Jones*v. *Warnock,*67 *Ga.*484. The case differs on its facts from *Akins*v. *Mull,*150 *Ga.*459 (104 S. E. 209), in which there was no hearing upon the merits of the case.

2. “In all suits for divorce, the party applying shall render a schedule, on oath, of the property owned or possessed by the parties at the time of the application — or at the time of the separation, if the parties have separated, — distinguishing the separate estate of the wife, if there be any, which shall be filed with the petition, or pending the suit, under the order of the court.” Civil Code, § 2954. “After a separation, no transfer by the husband of any of the property, except bona fide in payment of pre-existing debts, shall pass the title so as to avoid the vesting thereof according to the final verdict of the jury in the cause.” § 2955. “The writ of injunction to restrain a husband from incumbering or disposing of his property pending a divorce and alimony suit should not be granted, where the husband is neither attempting nor threatening to sell or encumber his property, and no other equitable ground for the issuance of the writ is shown to exist.” *Melvin*v. *Melvin,*129 *Ga.*42 (2) (58 S. E. 474). “A court of equity may appoint a receiver to take possession of, and hold, subject to the direction of the court, any assets charged with the payment of debts, where there is manifest danger of loss, or destruction, or material injury to those interested.” Civil Code, § 5479. “The power of appointing receivers and ordering injunctions should be prudently and cautiously exercised, and except in clear and urgent cases should not be resorted to.” § 5477. Applying the foregoing principles to the pleadings and uncontradicted evidence in this ease, the judge erred in continuing the receivership. In this connection see *Cooleewahee Co.*v. *Sparks,*148 *Ga.*211 (96 S. E. 131) *; Coe Mfg. Co.*v. *Dublin &c. Bank,*160 *Ga.*675 (128 S. E.*908); Dixie Metal Products Co.*v. *Jones,*163 *Ga.*70 (135 S. E. 406).

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*688
      *E. W.*McLariy, for plaintiff. *Marvin G. Bussell,*for defendant.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-41384

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

JAMES BRANDON STROUSE,

Defendant−Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-46-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Strouse filed a notice of appeal from an order denying his motion 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 14, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-41384 Document: 00514156161 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/14/2017
No. 16-41384

2

under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 to correct the presentence report 

(“PSR”) after his conviction of possession of child pornography. He does not 

address that motion in his appellate brief, however, and thereby has effectively 

not appealed that issue. See Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy Sheriff Abner, 

813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); see also Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 

224−25 (5th Cir. 1993).

Instead, Strouse’s brief challenges an order by the district court, in a 

separate case, that denied a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. He 

also moves to vacate the Rule 60(b) order and to remand that case to the district 

court. The Rule 60(b) motion is pending before this court in another appeal. 

Thus, with respect to Strouse’s Rule 36 and Rule 60(b) issues, the appeal is 

DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.3d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 

1983).

To the extent that Strouse also seeks review of the order denying his

recusal motion under 28 U.S.C. § 455, we lack jurisdiction because the notice 

of appeal designated the Rule 36 order and was filed before the § 455 order was 

issued, so the appeal in that respect is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. 

See FED. R. APP. P. 3(c)(B); Warfield v. Fid. & Deposit Co., 904 F.2d 322, 325−26 

(5th Cir. 1990). Strouse’s motions to disqualify the judge, vacate the judge’s 

orders, and remand are DENIED, as is Strouse’s motion to consolidate the two 

appeals.

 Case: 16-41384 Document: 00514156161 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/14/2017
# FILED

LLOYD BELL, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

### SEP 

## 3 0 2009 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON,CLERK U S. DISTRICT COURT



## 1 v. ) CivilActionNo. 

# u9 1868 ) JILL R. GRANT, 

## 1 ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comesbefore the Court on review ofplaintiffspro se complaint and application to proceed informa pauperis. The application will be granted, but the complaint will be dismissed. Plaintiff alleges that Dr. Jill Grant engaged in a criminal conspiracy by prescribing medication for the treatment ofplaintiffs mental illness with knowledge of its objectionable side affects. See Compl. at 2. Plaintiff "is seeking restitutional punishment money for the crimes exposed in this complaint" in the amount of $1 million. Id. at 3. Generally, "in the criminal context, the Supreme Court has refused to imply aprivate right of action in 'a bare criminal statute."' Prunte v. Universal

### Music Group, 484 

### F. Supp. 2d 32,42 (D.D.C. 2006) (quoting Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 79-80 (1975)). The criminal statute on which plaintiff appears to rely, 18 U.S.C. 

## 5 241, does not create aprivate right of action. See Ibrahim v. Latham & Watkins, No. 09-0732,2009 

### WL 1076695 (D.D.C. Apr. 22,2009) (dismissing criminal conspiracy claim on the ground that "[o]nly the federal government can bring an action for criminal conspiracy under 18U.S.C.

## 5 24lW), aff'd, No. 09-7048,2009 WL 

# 1 2762198 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 28,2009).The Court will dismiss this action because the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 

### See 28 

### U.S.C.

## 44 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), 1915A(b)(l). 

### An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

United StatesDistrict Judge
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23074-3 Filed:12/13/22 Entered:12/15/22 15:25:00 Desc:

Appendix 3 Page 1 of 2
c#:23074-3 Filed:12/13/22 Entered:12/15/22 15:25:00 Desc:

Appendix 3 Page 2 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19827 Filed:01/18/22 Entered:01/19/22 16:35:10 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19827 Filed:01/18/22 Entered:01/19/22 16:35:10 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.1


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

                                 April __, 2001

         For value received, Boeing Capital Corporation, a Delaware corporation
("BCC"), hereby unconditionally promises to pay to Boeing Nevada, Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("BNI"), the principal sum of $________________ or such
other sum on the register attached hereto that documents the principal amount
then outstanding of the loan made hereunder by BNI to BCC,


(i)      the outstanding principal amount as shown on the attached schedule, and

(ii)     interest on the loan from the date thereof to the date of payment at
         the rate per annum indicated on such schedule which shall be reset
         every month based on BCC's 30-day commercial paper borrowing rate;

such payment to be made at the maturity date indicated on the attached schedule,
or upon a mutually agreed upon date; provided, however, BCC may, at its option,
pay all or any part of the outstanding principal of the loan made hereunder any
time, with all accrued interest thereon, without premium or penalty.

Interest on the principal amount of the loan will be payable monthly on the 9th
day of each month. Such interest shall be computed using an actual/360 day
basis, or such other basis as agreed to by BNI.

If any date that a payment of interest or principal is due falls on a day that
is not a business day for both BCC and BNI, the required payment will be made on
the next succeeding business day, and interest will accrue on such payment for
the period from and after such original payment date to the date of payment on
the next succeeding business day.


BNI shall, and is hereby authorized by BCC to, record on the schedule attached
hereto and made a part hereof, the amount of the loan made by BNI hereunder and
the payment of principal or interest or both by or on behalf of BCC, the date
thereof, and the resulting principal balance then outstanding of the loan.

All payments under this Note shall be made in immediately available funds in
United States dollars. The laws of the State of California shall govern this
Note.


                                       BOEING CAPITAL CORPORATION


                                   By:  ______________________________

                                   Title: _____________________________