alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 238.84 Covered convictions or agreements to enter into pre-trial diversions or similar programs. ( a ) *Covered convictions and agreements.* Except as described in § 238.85, this subpart covers: ( 1 ) Any conviction of a criminal offense involving dishonesty, breach of trust, or money laundering. Convictions do not cover arrests, pending cases not brought to trial, acquittals, convictions reversed on appeal, pardoned convictions, or expunged convictions.
( 2 ) Any agreement to enter into a pretrial diversion or similar program in connection with a prosecution for a criminal offense involving dishonesty, breach of trust or money laundering. A pretrial diversion or similar program is a program involving a suspension or eventual dismissal of charges or of a criminal prosecution based upon an agreement for treatment, rehabilitation, restitution, or other non-criminal or non-punitive alternative.
( b ) *Dishonesty or breach of trust.* A determination whether a criminal offense involves dishonesty or breach of trust is based on the statutory elements of the crime. ( 1 ) “Dishonesty” means directly or indirectly to cheat or defraud, to cheat or defraud for monetary gain or its equivalent, or to wrongfully take property belonging to another in violation of any criminal statute. Dishonesty includes acts involving a want of integrity, lack of probity, or a disposition to distort, cheat, or act deceitfully or fraudulently, and may include crimes which federal, state or local laws define as dishonest.
( 2 ) “Breach of trust” means a wrongful act, use, misappropriation, or omission with respect to any property or fund which has been committed to a person in a fiduciary or official capacity, or the misuse of one's official or fiduciary position to engage in a wrongful act, use, misappropriation, or omission.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3395 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3395

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the definition of 
                  contribution in aid of construction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 29, 2003

Mr. Herger (for himself and Mr. Matsui) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the definition of 
                  contribution in aid of construction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lower Regulatory Burden for 
Homeowners Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF CONTRIBUTION IN AID OF CONSTRUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 118(c)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to definitions) is amended to 
read as follows:
                    ``(A) Contribution in aid of construction.--The 
                term `contribution in aid of construction' shall be 
                defined by regulations prescribed by the Secretary, 
                except that such term--
                            ``(i) shall include amounts paid as 
                        customer connection fees (including amounts 
                        paid to connect the customer's water service 
                        line or sewer lateral line to the utility's 
                        distribution or collection system or extend a 
                        main water or sewer line to provide service to 
                        a customer), and
                            ``(ii) shall not include amounts paid as 
                        service charges for starting or stopping 
                        services.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to amounts received after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 741

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 741 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 741.205 Reporting requirements for credit unions that are newly chartered or in troubled condition.

Any federally insured credit union chartered for less than 2 years or any credit union defined to be in troubled condition as set forth in § 701.14(b)(3) of this chapter must adhere to the requirements stated in § 701.14(c) of this chapter concerning the prior notice and NCUA review. Federally insured state-chartered credit unions must submit required information to both the appropriate NCUA Regional Director and their state supervisor. NCUA will consult with the state supervisor before making its determination. NCUA will notify the state supervisor of its approval/disapproval no later than the time that it notifies the affected individual.

[60 FR 58504, Nov. 28, 1995, as amended at 78 FR 4029, Jan. 18, 2013]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3540

To extend for an additional year the period for which chapter 12 of title 

11 of the United States Code is reenacted. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2003

Mr. SMITH of Michigan (for himself and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To extend for an additional year the period for which chapter 

12 of title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF PERIOD FOR WHICH 

4 CHAPTER 12 OF TITLE 11, UNITED STATES 

5 CODE, IS REENACTED. 

6 (a) AMENDMENTS.—Section 149 of title I of division 

7 C of Public Law 105–277 (11 U.S.C. 1201 note) is 

8 amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘January 1, 2004’’ each place 

10 it appears and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2005’’; and 
2

•HR 3540 IH 

1 (2) in subsection (a)—

2 (A) by striking ‘‘June 30, 2003’’ and in3 serting ‘‘December 31, 2003’’; and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘July 1, 2003’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘January 1, 2004’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 subsection (a) take effect on January 1, 2004.

Æ
§ 349.17 Application and closing out of offsetting long and short positions. ( a ) *Application of purchases and sales.* Any FDIC-supervised insured depository institution that— ( 1 ) Engages in a retail forex transaction involving the purchase of any currency for the account of any retail forex customer when the account of such retail forex customer at the time of such purchase has an open retail forex transaction for the sale of the same currency;
( 2 ) Engages in a retail forex transaction involving the sale of any currency for the account of any retail forex customer when the account of such retail forex customer at the time of such sale has an open retail forex transaction for the purchase of the same currency;
( 3 ) Purchases a put or call option involving foreign currency for the account of any retail forex customer when the account of such retail forex customer at the time of such purchase has a short put or call option position with the same underlying currency, strike price, and expiration date as that purchased; or
( 4 ) Sells a put or call option involving foreign currency for the account of any retail forex customer when the account of such retail forex customer at the time of such sale has a long put or call option position with the same underlying currency, strike price, and expiration date as that sold shall: ( i ) Immediately apply such purchase or sale against such previously held opposite transaction; and
( ii ) Promptly furnish such retail forex customer with a statement showing the financial result of the transactions involved and the name of any introducing broker to the account.
( b ) *Close-out against oldest open position.* In all instances where the short or long position in a customer's retail forex account immediately prior to an offsetting purchase or sale is greater than the quantity purchased or sold, the FDIC-supervised insured depository institution shall apply such offsetting purchase or sale to the oldest portion of the previously held short or long position.
( c ) *Transactions to be applied as directed by customer.* Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the offsetting transaction shall be applied as directed by a retail forex customer's specific instructions. These instructions may not be made by the FDIC-supervised insured depository institution or an IAP.
[76 FR 40789, July 12, 2011. Redesignated at 80 FR 74912, Nov. 30, 2015]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24901]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Justice Programs

[OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1505]


Vehicular Digital Multimedia Evidence Recording System Standard 
Special Technical Committee

AGENCY: National Institute of Justice.

ACTION: Notice of Request for Proposals for Certification Expertise.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) is in the process of 
developing a new Vehicular Digital Multimedia Evidence Recording System 
Standard and corresponding certification program requirements. This 
work is being performed by a Special Technical Committee (STC), 
comprised of practitioners from the field, researchers, testing 
experts, certification experts, and representatives from stakeholder 
organizations. The STC members will participate in four 2-day meetings 
over a 7-month time period with the goal of completing development of 
the standard and certification program requirements. It is anticipated 
that STC meetings will begin in November 2009. Travel expenses and per 
diem will be reimbursed for all STC meetings; however, participation 
time will not be funded.
    NIJ is seeking certification bodies with experience in programs for 
similar types of electronic equipment. Additional preferred knowledge 
includes experience with in-car video systems or experience with law 
enforcement operations. There are two positions to be filled on the 
STC, and NIJ will accept the first 10 submissions for review.
    Interested parties are requested to nominate individuals from their 
organizations and submit no more than two pages describing the 
nominee's applicable experience, preferred knowledge, and affiliations 
with standards development organizations. This information shall be 
submitted to Frances Scott at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2d4c0d3dcd1d7c19cc1d1ddc6c6f2c7c1d6ddd89cd5ddc4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="167064777875736538657579626256636572797c38717960">[email protected]</span></a> by October 16, 
2009. The submissions will be reviewed, and participants will be 
notified regarding their acceptance by October 30, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Casandra Robinson by telephone at 202-
305-2296 [Note: this is not a toll-free telephone number], or by e-mail 
at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#65260416040b0117044b170a070c0b160a0b251016010a0f4b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4e7c5d7c5cac0d6c58ad6cbc6cdcad7cbcae4d1d7c0cbce8ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kristina Rose,
Acting Director, National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. E9-24901 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Official Journal C 424/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 424 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6420 October 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 424

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6420 October 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 424/01 | Euro exchange rates — 19 October 2021 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 424/01

Euro exchange rates — 19 October 2021

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 424/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10446 – Swiss Life Holding/Gelsenwasser/Infrareal) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 2 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 424/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10446 – Swiss Life Holding/Gelsenwasser/Infrareal) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3248

To amend the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act 

of 1965 to make available additional funds to increase access to the 

arts through the support of education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 2, 2003

Mrs. WILSON of New Mexico introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the National Foundation on the Arts and the 

Humanities Act of 1965 to make available additional 

funds to increase access to the arts through the support 

of education.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Arts Education Ad5 vancement Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

7 (a) USE OF FUNDS FOR ELEMENTARY AND SEC8 ONDARY EDUCATION.—Section 5A(b) of the National 
2

•HR 3248 IH 

1 Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965 

2 (20 U.S.C. 954a(b)) is amended—

3 (1) in paragraph (8) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

4 end, 

5 (2) in paragraph (9) by striking the period at 

6 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’, and 

7 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(10) increase accessibility to the arts through 

9 art education in formal systems of elementary and 

10 secondary education.’’. 

11 (b) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Section 11(f)(1) of 

12 the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities 

13 Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 960(f)(1)) is amended—

14 (1) by striking ‘‘$175,000,000, 50 percent’’ and 

15 inserting ‘‘$98,000,000, 100 percent’’, and 

16 (2) by adding at the end the following ‘‘Of the 

17 aggregate amount made available to carry out sec18 tion 5A in any fiscal year, 50 percent shall be made 

19 available for the use specified in section 5A(b)(10).’’. 

20 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

21 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

22 take effect on the 1st day of the 1st fiscal year that begins 

23 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### CROY ET AL. v. OHIO.

Sureties of the peace — bond for, good at common law — bill of exceptions.

Where a bond has been given on a complaint, for sureties of the peace, it is not void, but good as a common law bond, the condition not being against law or good morals, but in furtherance of both.

A bill of exceptions, signed *J.*Wiley, *pro lem.¿*without showing that he was a judge, or without the signatures of a majority, or quorum of the court, is a nullity.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas. The suit below was upon a bond given by the plaintiff in error, under a proceeding for sureties of the peace. It was objected to in the court below, but admitted and a bill of exceptions sealed.

*Thompson,*for the plaintiff,

urged that the *bond*was void. The law requii'es a *recognizance*in such cases.

Bx the Court.

The bond may be good at common law, though not good as a statutory bond. The parties are competent to contract, and the condition is not against law or good morals, but given in furtherance of both. A recognizance would have been more regular, and in compliance with the statute. But the bond is not void. These questions, however, are not before us. The bill of exceptions is a nullity. It is not signed and sealed by a *majority,*or quo*136rum of the judges, but is signed *J.*Wiley, *pro tem.*Whether Wiley was a judge, or what he was, does not appear, and there is no other signature.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
# Official Journal C 1/4 Ja

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 1 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 484 January 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 1

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 484 January 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 001/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 001/2 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2005/C 001/3 | Uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature (CN) (Classification of goods) | 3 |
| 2005/C 001/4 | Notice of initiation of a partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating, inter alia, in India | 5 |
| 2005/C 001/5 | Holidays in 2005 | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 001/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 001/2

Euro exchange rates

2

2005/C 001/3

Uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature (CN) (Classification of goods)

3

2005/C 001/4

Notice of initiation of a partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating, inter alia, in India

inter alia

5

2005/C 001/5

Holidays in 2005

7

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROBERT EVAN BOUCHLAS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2069

[July 18, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432022CF000172A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Sue-Ellen Kenny, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### McDONALD v. PAGE.

Costs — attorney’s fees — no parol evidence to explain the term *costs*— plea *puis darrain*continuance.

The term cosSs has a 'legal signification, and includes only taxable costs, not attorney’s fees. Parol evidence is inadmissible to prove,-that the parties to a written agreement to pay cos&, intended to embrace-attorney’s fees.

Assumpsit upon a promissory note. The defendant pleaded puis darrain continuance, that he had agreed with the plaintiff to pay him a certain sum *and costs,*and the plaintiff should discontinue these suits, which sum with the costs he had paid. Issue was taken on this.

The plaintiff contended that the agreement, which was in writing, obliged the defendant to pay the attorney’s fees in the suit, and offered evidence to .prove., that such was the understanding of the parties, and that the word *costs*used by them, was intended to embrace those fees.

Lane, J.

The evidence is inadmissible. The word *costs*has a legal signification. It includes only those expenditures which are, by law, *taxable, and to be*included in the judgment.

The defendant had judgment.
Order filed, April 1 9 , 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00253

- CR

____________ NANCY RICHEY , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Crim Ct at Law No 10

Harris County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. 1814444



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due March 23, 2012 , 2012

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On March 29, 2012 , this court ordered David Fortson to file the record within 20 days. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order David Fortson , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 10 days of the date of this order

. No further extension will be

e ntertained absent exceptional circumstances

. The trial and appellate courts arejointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App.

P. 35.3(c). If David Fortson does not timely file the record as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure
to file the record.

PER CURIAM
Order entered May 19, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00146-CV

SUZANNE HITSELBERGER, Appellant

V.

LOUIS BAKOS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-18280

ORDER

The reporter’s record was filed on May 3, 2021. On May 5, 2021, counsel 

for appellant filed a letter informing the court reporter that the reporter’s record is 

incomplete. On the Court’s own motion, we ORDER Glenda Finkley, Official 

Court Reporter for the 256th Judicial District Court, to file, by June 2, 2021, the 

following: (1) a supplemental reporter’s record containing Petitioner’s and 

Respondent’s Exhibits admitted during the trial conducted on August 26, 2020 and 
(2) the reporter’s record of the motion for new trial hearing conducted on February 

8, 2021.

Appellant’s brief will be due thirty days after the above-listed additional 

reporter’s records are filed.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Finkley and all parties.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
#### § 310.7 Request for amendment of record.

The Corporation will maintain all records it uses in making any determination about any individual with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness and completeness as is reasonably necessary to assure fairness to the individual in the determination. An individual may request that the Corporation amend any portion of a record pertaining to that individual which the Corporation maintains in a designated system of records. Such a request should be submitted in writing to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Attn: FOIA/PA Group, 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429 and should contain the individual's reason for requesting the amendment and a description of the record (including the name of the appropriate designated system and category thereof) sufficient to enable the Corporation to identify the particular record or portion thereof with respect to which amendment is sought.

[76 FR 35966, June 21, 2011]