# M . Jodi Rell GOVERNOR STATE OF CONNECTICUT October 6, 2009 The Honorable Lisa P. Jackson Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building, 1101A 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W . Washington, DC20460 Dear Administrator Jackson: 

# RECHVED OCT 1 3 2009

-- OFFICE OF THE REGMnL AN"INISTRATOR

I am writing to provide you with Connecticut's recommended attainment designations for the revised national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for airborne lead, which was finalized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on October 15, 2008. Section 107(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) provides up to one year after adoption ofa new or revised NAAQS for states to submit recommendations identifying areas that comply with the standard or that violate orcontribute to nearby violations ofthe standard. Based on a reviewof monitored data and consistent with CAA Section 107(d)(1) and EPAguidance, the entire state of Connecticut should be designated as attainment for the revised lead NAAQS. This recommendation for a statewide attainment designation is supported by available lead monitoring and emissions data, as summarized in the attachment. The Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection's (CTDEP) most recent ambient lead measurements associated with total suspended particulate (TSP) monitors were collected in calendar year 2002. Those data indicate that maximum3-month running averages atthat time were 0.01 p,g/m3, well below the revised lead NAAQS of0.15 pg/m3. More recent lead levels gathered through 2008are estimated to be less than 0.015 pg/m3, as derived fromConnecticut's fine particle (PMZ.5) speciation sites. These low measured lead levels are consistent with the low estimated emissions from individual lead sources in Connecticut, all ofwhich are significantly less than either the 0.5 ton/year or 1 .0 ton/year emission thresholds currently identified by EPA as triggering the need for source-specific ambient lead monitoring. When considered together, both the ambient monitored data and source emission levels support an attainment designation for the revised lead NAAQS throughout Connecticut. Please contact Anne Gobin, Chiefof CTDEP's Bureau ofAir Management at 860-424-3026with any questions regarding this recommendation.

Attachment cc: 1. Leighton (EPA Region 1) D . Conroy (EPA Region 1) A. Marrella (CTDEP) A. Gobin (CTDEP) EXECUTIVE CHAMBERS " STATE CAPITOL 210 CAPITOL AVENUE, HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06106 TEL (860) 566-4840 " FAX (860) 524-7396 " www .CT.GOV GOVERNOR. RELL@CT.GOV

### ATTACHMENT Connecticut's Recommended Designations for the 2008 Lead NAAQS Summary ofAmbient Monitoring and Source Emissions Data (October 2009) On October 15, 2008, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized revisions to the national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for airborne lead, adopting a more stringent standard of0

.15 ~tg/m3(three month rolling average) compared to the previous NAAQS of 1 .5 ptg/m3(quarterly average) . Section 107(d)(1) ofthe Clean Air Act (CAA) provides up to one year after adoption ofa new or revised NAAQS for states to submit recommendations identifying areas that comply with the standard or that violate or contribute to nearby violations ofthe standard. As summarized below, available lead ambient monitoring and source emissions data support a designation ofattainment for all of Connecticut for the revised lead NAAQS. Summary of Lead Ambient Monitoring Data CTDEP's most recent monitoring for ambient lead levels in total suspended particulates (TSP) was conducted in downtown Waterbury through the end of 2002. As summarized in Table 1, 3-month average lead concentrations in 2002 were more than a full order of magnitude below the 2008 NAAQS of0

.15 gg/m3

. More recent measurements of lead have been collected in New Haven as part ofthe Speciated Trends Network (STN) and in Cornwall as part ofthe Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) program using PM2 .5 filters (see Figure 1) . Utilizing the "2/3rds method" described in the literature1,2,3, lead-PM,o concentration estimates were calculated fromthe PM2,5 measurements (i .e., measured lead-PMZ.S levels were multiplied by 1 .5 - the inverse of2/3rds -- to estimate lead-PM,o levels) . Calculated lead-PM~o values are all less than 0 .01 pg/m3, more than a full order of magnitude below the 2008 lead NAAQS . Summary of Lead Source Emission Levels In addition to reviewing ambient lead measurements, CTDEPalso examined available emissions data to identify the largest sources of lead in Connecticut, as summarized in Table 2 and Figure 2 . All sources identified had lead emissions below 0 .3 tons/year, less than 30% of the 1 .0 ton/year source magnitude identified by EPAas requiring source-oriented ambient monitoring. Recommendation When considered together, the low levels of both ambient monitored and source emissions of lead support an attainment designation for the revised lead NAAQSthroughout Connecticut.

' Allen et al . 2001 . Size Distributions ofTrace Metals in Atmospheric Aerosols in the United Kingdom . Atmospheric Environment. 35. 4581-4591 . '' Fernandez et al 2001 . Size Distribution of Metals in Urban Aerosols in Seville. Atmospheric Environment. 35. 2595-2601 . j Singh et al . 2002. Size Distribution and Diurnal Characteristics of Particle-Bound Metals in Source and Receptor Sites ofthe Los Angeles Basin. Atmospheric Environment.36. 1675-1689 . 1

### Table 1 . Waterbury, Connecticut; Low-Volume TSP Lead Monitoring Data for 2002

Date Monthly

Lead-TSP Concentration (pg/m3) 3 Month RunningAverage Lead-TSP Concentration ( Jan-02 0 .016 0 .012 Feb-02 0 .018 0 .014 Mar-02 0 .006 0 .013 Apr-02 0 .006 0 .010 May-02 0 0 .004 Jun-02 0 .015 0 .007 Jul-02 0 .005 0 .007 Aug-02 0 .006 0.009 Sep-02 0 .01 0 .007 Oct-02 0.0058 0 .007 Nov-02 0 0 .005 Dec-02 0 .0029 0 .003 Annual Average: ~ 0 . 008 

### Figure 1 . Monthly Ambient Lead Estimates fromConnecticut's IMPROVE (Cornwall, CT)

and STN (New

Haven, CT) Ambient Monitoring Sites 

## 0,160 0 .140 0.120 0.100 aa 0,080 m e c 0.060 0 u 0,040 0 .020 0 .000 

### Estimated P

:1Ilo Lead Concentrations For Conneticut's Two PN1, .5

Speciated Sites 2008 NAAQS Level

--+-Corti,,vall NTohawk I I Niountain --~'-'Nevv Haven CriscuoloPark

_ ._ .r. . . . . . ._ . .. ~ ~ .. ., ~~ . i I z f 7 Z

### Sources Facility Name" Town Data Source ~ Best Estimate (TPY) Danbury Municipal Airport Danbury 2005 CT Airport Survey Estimate 0 .270 Hartford"Brainard Airport Hartford 2005 CT Airport SurveyEstimate 0 .265 Robertson Field Plainville 2005 CTAirport Survey Estimate 0.193 Igor I . Sikorsky Memorial Airport Bridgeport 2005 CT Airport Survey Estimate 0 .193 C&M Corp Wauregan TRI 2007 0 .180 Tweed-New

Haven Airport New Haven 2005 CT Airport SurveyEstimate 0 .178 Cttoton"New

London Airport (3roton 2005 CT Airport Survey Estimate 0.171 Ellington Airport Ellington 2005 CT Airport Survey Estimate 0.114 Skylark's Air Park East Windsor 2005 CT Airport Survey Estimate 0 .110 Waterbury" Oxford Airport Waterbury 2005 CT Airport Survey Estimate 0.089 Bradley International Airport Windsor CT Airport Survey Estimate 0 .082 Covanta MID CT RRF/CRRA Hartford May 7 2008 Stack Test 0 .055 Danielson Airport Danielson 2005 CT Airport Survey Estimate 0 .054 Meriden-MarkhamMunicipal Airport Meriden 2005 CT Airport Survey Estimate 0.054

Oriswold Airport Essex 2005 CT Airport Survey Estimate 0.042 Wheelabrator Bridgeport Bridgeport June 24 2008 Stack Test 0.040 MIISTPEQ/Specialty Minerals North Canaan TRI 2007 0.036 Simsbury Tri-TownAirport Sirnsbury 2005 Cl' Airport Survey Estimate 0 .036 Amerbelle Textiles Vernon Annual Emissions Estimate (LPE(t) 2005 0.034 Windham

Airport Windham 2005 CT Airport Survey Estimate 0.033 AES Thames LLC Uncasville Emissions Statement 2007 0 .031 Waterbury-Plymouth Airport WaterburY 2005 CT Airport Survey Estimate 0 .020 ChesterAirport Chester 2005 CT Airport Survey Estimate 0.017 PSECt PWR CT LLC/ BPT Harbor Station Bridgeport March 17 2009 Stack Test 0.017

North Canaan Airport North Canaan 2005 CT Airport Survey Estimate 0 .011 Toney S Crane Plantsville TRI2007 0 .003 MCP Metal Specialties FairFeld TRI2007 0 .003 H .B Ives New Haven TRI 2007 0 .002 Sargent Manufacturing NewHaven TRI2007 0 .001 MDCHartford Hartford October 29 2008, Stack Test 0.001 Borough of Naugatuck Naugatuck July 312002, Stack Test negligible Ameteck Wallingford Emissions Statement 2008 negligible RarlctffWire Bristol Lead use negligible negligible Turner &

Seymour Torrlngton No lead use reported negligible Peter Paidetectronfss NewBritain TRI2007corrected negligible H Krevlt&Caryaanlp New Haven No lead use reported negligible 

### Table 2 . Ranking ofConnecticut's Largest LeadN

L bA LT, o ^

C D E JW 3 r d o Z n CQ v N aa ~ o O Cl N (O N (~7 p W W pJ C C N OP O O f0 (U I N (!7 -~ N N E 'E ` 

# A

~ www

O _N II II 'E ,~+i tn W V Al C N N Ql

C N Vi N

., C N N O

Q ai