alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 12-14-00131-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

EDOM CORNER, LLC AND

EARL A. BERRY, JR., 

APPELLANTS

V.

IT'S THE BERRY'S, LLC

D/B/A MARY ELLEN'S,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 294TH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

VAN ZANDT COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Edom Corner, LLC and Earl A. Berry, Jr. have filed a “Notice of Interlocutory Appeal.” 

We construe the notice as a petition for permission to appeal the trial court’s order relating to 

prior litigation between Appellants and It’s The Berry’s, LLC d/b/a Mary Ellen’s. See TEX. CIV.

PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d) (West Supp. 2013); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3 & cmt. 

Appellants have not established that they are entitled to a permissive appeal. Accordingly, we 

deny their petition for permissive appeal. 

Opinion delivered June 11, 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JUNE 11, 2014

NO. 12-14-00131-CV

EDOM CORNER, LLC AND EARL A. BERRY, JR.,

Appellants

V.

IT'S THE BERRY'S, LLC D/B/A MARY ELLEN'S,

Appellee

Appeal from the 294th District Court 

of Van Zandt County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 09-00138)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this petition for permissive appeal should be 

denied.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this petition for permissive appeal be, and the same is, hereby denied; and that this decision be 

certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
-03283-LTS Doc#:2307 Filed:01/30/18 Entered:01/30/18 14:04:20 De

Document Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 198 (Thursday, October 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24743]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee Mathematical and Physical Sciences; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee Mathematical and Physical Sciences 
(<greek-i>66).
    Date/Time: November 4, 2009 2 p.m.- 4 p.m., November 5, 2009 8 
a.m.-6 p.m., November 6, 2009 8 a.m.-3 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230. November 5, Room 1005, November 6 & 7, Room 
1235.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Morris L. Aizenman, Senior Science 
Associate, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Room 
1005, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, 
VA 22230. (703) 292-8807.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning NSF science and education activities within the 
Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences.
    Agenda: Briefing to new members about NSF and Directorate (11/
4). Update on current status of Directorate. Reports from liaisons 
with other Advisory Committees. Meeting of MPSAC with Divisions 
within MPS Directorate. Discussion of MPS Long-term Planning Areas.
    Summary Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed 
above.

    Dated: October 9, 2009.
Susanne E. Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-24743 Filed 10-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### MARGARET St. JOHN *v.*JOSIAH St. JOHN.

Divorce — wilful absence — sending wife home.

Where a man sends his *w\fe to*her friends, and leaves the country without any known cause, more than three years, he will be presumed wilfully absent.

Divorce. Cause wilful absence more than three years. It was proven that the parties were married in Warren county in 1827, and removed to Cincinnati, and lived there about a year together. He then' sent her to her friends, and left the country for South America, without her knowledge, or any known cause, and has been absent since 1828. No difficulty was known to exist between them. It was supposed by his friends, that he thought her *too old for Mm.*Her character is good.

Divorce decreed.
H. R. 3300

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 15500

Pearl Road in Strongsville, Ohio, as the ‘‘Walter F. Ehrnfelt, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

15500 Pearl Road in Strongsville, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Walter F. Ehrnfelt, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Walter

F. Ehrnfelt, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
From: Mike Ahern

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang Subject: chromium_request.xlsx

Date: Friday, March 11, 2011 10:12:42 AM

Attachments: chromium_request.XLSX chromium.ZIP



### Hi Cindy, Attached is a spreadsheet of the operating facilities that match the SCCs you provided. Also attached is a facility profile for each of the facilities. In each profile, you should be able to identify many of the parameters and control information you are interested in. In addition, you can use the ten-digit facility ID to search for all permits issued to each facility by entering the facility ID into our public permits search web page. To access any/all permit documents that we have electronically that are associated with the facilities listed the spreadsheet, simply go to http://extapex.epa.state.oh.us/epaxp/f?p=840:10 and enter the ten-digit facility ID associated with the facility (first column of the spreadsheet). The search results will pull up all permit records available in STARS2 (our internal permitting system). If we have any electronic copy of permit terms in STARS2 that are associated with an issued final permit, there will be a link on the far right column of the search results. Clicking on the link will provide access to a fully text searchable copy of the permit terms. Please note that our electronic copies of permit terms date back to late 1998 for PTIs and back to 1995 for Title V and State PTOs. Some documents represent only the portion of the issued permit that was specific to the operations being permitted at the time (i.e., the general terms and conditions may not be present in the PDF document, but the PDF document does represent the operation-specific requirements that were issued final). This is the result of how the predecessor to STARS2 was structured and how data migrated from that old system to the current system (and is exactly what a staff person sees when they access the electronic document via STARS2). An original copy of the "whole" permit can be obtained by contacting the appropriate Ohio EPA District office or local air agency (they can scan the hard copy and send it via email), or, as we indicate on the web page that links to the search page, " Official hard copies of permits are available for accurate verification in the
Director's Journal."

Please feel free to contact me with any questions.

Sincerely,



### Mike Ahern Permit Issuance and Data Management Section Division of Air Pollution Control mike.ahern@epa.state.oh.us
614-644-3631

mwa Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Unless otherwise provided by law,
this communication and any response to it constitutes a public record.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 316 

To eliminate certain restrictions on the availability of credits under title 

III of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 for the use of biodiesel fuel, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2003 

Mr. SHIMKUS (for himself, Ms. MCCARTHY of Missouri, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. KIRK, and Mr. LIPINSKI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To eliminate certain restrictions on the availability of credits 

under title III of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 for 

the use of biodiesel fuel, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BIODIESEL FUEL USE CREDITS. 

4 Section 312 of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (42 

5 U.S.C. 13220) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (b)— 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 316 IH 

1 (A) by striking ‘‘OF CREDITS’’ and all that 

2 follows through ‘‘At the request’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘OF CREDITS.—At the request’’; and 

4 (B) by striking paragraph (2); and 

5 (2) in subsection (c)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘NOT’’ in the subsection 

7 heading; and 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘not’’. 

9 SEC. 2. ALTERNATIVE FUELED VEHICLE MARKET STUDY 

10 AND REPORT. 

11 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Energy shall conduct 

12 a thorough study to determine— 

13 (1) the availability and cost of light duty motor 

14 vehicles that qualify as alternative fueled vehicles for 

15 purposes of title V of the Energy Policy Act of 1992; 

16 and 

17 (2) the availability and cost of fuels that qualify 

18 as alternative fuels for purposes of title V of the En19 ergy Policy Act of 1992. 

20 (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 1 year 

21 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

22 of Energy shall transmit to the Congress a report on the 

23 results of the study conducted under subsection (a), in24 cluding any legislative recommendations. 

Æ 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### § 7.1005 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT A

Schedule of Claims Subject to the Five Hundred Forty-Fourth Omnibus Objection 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22748-1 Filed:10/28/22 Entered:10/28/22 18:36:08 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 2
PRIORITY 

STATUS

Five Hundred Forty-Fourth Omnibus Objection

Exhibit A - Claims to Be Reduced and Allowed

ASSERTED MODIFIED AND ALLOWED

NAME DEBTOR

PRIORITY 

CLAIM # STATUS AMOUNT DEBTOR AMOUNT

 1 COMMUNICATION 29448 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Unsecured $15,545.14 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Unsecured $168.00

LEASING LEASING 

CORPORATION

ANA ALBERTORIO

PO BOX 362526

SAN JUAN, PR 00936-2565

Reason: Invoices totaling $15,377.14 were paid via checks 00281393, 00021360, 00022456, and 00026446 on 02/05/2014, 04/18/2018, 05/18/2018, and 09/18/2018. The Claimant 

shall retain the non-modified portion of the claim.

 2 FRANCISCO DIAZ MASSO / 57965 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Unsecured $17,671.00 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Unsecured $220.12

BERMUDEZ, LONGO, 

DIAZ-MASSO, LLC

PO BOX 192596

SAN JUAN, PR 00919

Reason: Invoices totaling $17,450.88 were paid via checks 303742, 303743, and 303744 on 06/13/2018. The Claimant shall retain the non-modified portion of the claim.

 3 QUILES GONZALEZ, 5435 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Unsecured $3,000.00* Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Unsecured $1,500.00

ANGEL

PEDRO G. CRUZ SÁNCHEZ

PO BOX 372290

CAYEY, PR 00737-2290

Reason: Proof of claim purports to assert liabilities associated with the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico totalling $3,000.00 related to case GDP-2009-0054. The Debtors' books and 

records state there was a judgment in the amount of $1,500.00. As such, the claim has been reduced to reflect this amount. Additionally, Claim was filed as unliquidated, the modified 

amount fully liquidates the Claim.

*Indicates claim contains unliquidated and/or undetermined amounts 1

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22748-1 Filed:10/28/22 Entered:10/28/22 18:36:08 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 2
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3441

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to phase 

out reduced price lunches and breakfasts by phasing in an increase 

in the income eligibility guidelines for free lunches and breakfasts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2003

Mr. SHAYS (for himself and Mrs. EMERSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to phase out reduced price lunches and breakfasts 

by phasing in an increase in the income eligibility guidelines for free lunches and breakfasts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘School Nutrition En5 hancement Act’’. 
2

•HR 3441 IH 

1 SEC. 2. INCOME ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR SCHOOL 

2 LUNCHES AND BREAKFASTS. 

3 Section 9(b) of the Richard B. Russell National 

4 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(b)) is amended—

5 (1) in paragraph (1), by redesignating subpara6 graph (B) as subparagraph (E); 

7 (2) by striking ‘‘(b)(1)(A) Not’’ and inserting 

8 the following: 

9 ‘‘(b) INCOME ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES.—

10 ‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Not’’; 

12 (3) in subparagraph (A)—

13 (A) by striking the second sentence and in14 serting the following: 

15 ‘‘(B) FREE LUNCHES.—The income guide16 lines for determining eligibility for free lunches 

17 shall be the following percentage of the applica18 ble family size income levels contained in the 

19 nonfarm income poverty guidelines prescribed 

20 by the Office of Management and Budget, as 

21 adjusted annually in accordance with subpara22 graph (E): 

23 ‘‘(i) For the school year beginning 

24 July 1, 2003, 130 percent. 

25 ‘‘(ii) For the school year beginning 

26 July 1, 2004, 140 percent. 
3

•HR 3441 IH 

1 ‘‘(iii) For the school year beginning 

2 July 1, 2005, 150 percent. 

3 ‘‘(iv) For the school year beginning 

4 July 1, 2006, 160 percent. 

5 ‘‘(v) For the school year beginning 

6 July 1, 2007, 170 percent. 

7 ‘‘(vi) For the school year beginning 

8 July 1, 2008, and each subsequent school 

9 year, 185 percent.’’; 

10 (B) in the third sentence—

11 (i) by striking ‘‘The’’ and inserting 

12 the following: 

13 ‘‘(C) REDUCED PRICE LUNCHES.—The’’; 

14 and 

15 (ii) by striking ‘‘subparagraph (B)’’ 

16 and inserting ‘‘subparagraph (E)’’; and 

17 (C) in the fourth sentence, by striking 

18 ‘‘The’’ and inserting the following: 

19 ‘‘(D) FREQUENCY OF REVISIONS.—The’’; 

20 and 

21 (4) in subparagraph (E) (as redesignated by 

22 paragraph (1))—

23 (A) by striking ‘‘The’’ and inserting the 

24 following: 

25 ‘‘(E) AMOUNT OF REVISIONS.—The’’; and 
4

•HR 3441 IH 

1 (B) by striking ‘‘subparagraph (A) of this 

2 paragraph’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraph (D)’’.

Æ
59–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–316 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 2786) 

TO REAUTHORIZE THE PROGRAMS FOR HOUSING ASSISTANCE FOR NATIVE AMERICANS 

SEPTEMBER 5, 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 633] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 633, by an 11–1 vote, report the same to the House with 

the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2786, the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Reauthorization Act of 2007, under an open rule with a preprinting requirement. The rule provides one hour of general debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services. The rule waives all 

points of order against consideration of the bill except clauses 9 

and 10 of rule XXI. The rule provides that the bill shall be considered as read. The rule waives all points of order against provisions 

of the bill. 

The rule provides that any amendment to the bill must be 

preprinted in the Congressional Record. Each amendment so printed may be offered only by the Member who caused it to be printed 

or his designee and shall be considered as read. The rule provides 

one motion to recommit with or without instructions. The rule provides that the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill 

to a time designated by the Speaker. The rule tables H. Res. 595, 

H. Res. 596, H. Res. 613, and H. Res. 614. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the rule waives all points of order against consideration 

of the bill (except for clauses 9 and 10 of rule XXI) and against proVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:49 Sep 05, 2007 Jkt 059008 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR316.XXX HR316

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with REPORTS
2 

visions in the bill, the Committee is not aware of any points of 

order. The waivers of all points of order are prophylactic in nature. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 289 

Date: September 5, 2007. 

Measure: H.R. 2786. 

Motion by: Mr. Dreier. 

Summary of motion: To grant an open rule. 

Results: Defeated 3–9. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Nay; Hastings (FL)—Nay; Matsui—Nay; Cardoza—Nay; Welch—Nay; Castor—Nay; Arcuri—Nay; 

Sutton—Nay; Dreier—Yea; Diaz-Balart—Yea; Sessions—Yea; 

Slaughter—Nay. 

Rules Committee record vote No. 290 

Date: September 5, 2007. 

Measure: H.R. 2786. 

Motion by: Mr. McGovern. 

Summary of motion: To report the rule. 

Results: Adopted 11–1. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Yea; Hastings (FL)—Yea; Matsui—Yea; Cardoza—Yea; Welch—Yea; Castor—Yea; Arcuri—Yea; 

Sutton—Yea; Dreier—Yea; Diaz-Balart—Yea; Sessions—Nay; 

Slaughter—Yea. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with REPORTS
§ 606.602 Application. ( a ) This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency. For example, members of the public may participate in the following “programs and activities” of the FCA: ( 1 ) Attending open meetings of the Farm Credit Board.
( 2 ) Making inquiries or filing complaints.
( 3 ) Using the FCA library in McLean, Virginia.
( 4 ) Seeking employment with FCA.
( 5 ) Attending any meeting, conference, seminar, or other program open to the public. This list is illustrative only and failure to include an activity does not necessarily mean that it is not covered by this regulation.
( b ) This regulation does not apply to the institutions that are regulated or examined by the FCA. However, this regulation governs the conduct of FCA personnel, in their interaction with employees of such institutions and employees of other Federal agencies, while discharging their official FCA duties.
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard D. Katz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Icagen, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.



By:

/s/ RICHARD D. KATZ, M.D.Richard D. Katz, M.D. Senior Vice President, Finance and CorporateDevelopment


Date: April 27, 2007
#### O. K. Key, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

Decision Filed April 18, 1923.

A Writ of Error to a Judgment of the Circuit Court within and for the County of Brevard; A. V. Long, Judge.

*Butt & Collins,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Landis, Fish & Hull,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that .there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, *431considered, ordered and adjudged by tbe Court that tbe said judgment of tbe Circuit Court be, and tbe same is hereby, affirmed.

Taylor, C. J., and Ellis and Browne, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, J., dissents.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

         Ivex Packaging Corporation, a Delaware corporation, owns all of the
outstanding capital stock of IPC, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which owns all
of the outstanding capital stock of the following:

     1.  Kama of Illinois Corporation, a Delaware corporation

     2.  Ivex Paper Mill Corporation, a Delaware corporation

     3.  IPMC Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation, which owns all of the
         outstanding capital stock of:

         (i)  IPMC, Inc., a Delaware corporation

     4.  CFI Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which owns all of the
         outstanding capital stock of:

         (i) Plastofilm Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which owns all
             of the outstanding stock of

             (a) Crystal Thermoplastics, Inc., a Rhode Island corporation
             (b) Plastofilm P.R., Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation
             (c) Pactuco Acquisition, Inc., a Delaware corporation
                    (i)   Pactuco Containers (Asia) Sdn. Bhd.
                    (ii)  Pactuco (China) Limited
                    (iii) Pactuco (Thailand) Limited

         (ii) CFI Recycling, Inc., a Delaware corporation
         (iii) Plastofilm Limited, a Northern Ireland corporation

     5.  Ultra Pac, Inc., a Minnesota corporation

     6.  Packaging Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation

     7.  Valley Express Lines, Inc., a Delaware corporation

     8.  Ivex Corporation, an Ontario corporation, which owns all of the
         outstanding capital stock of:

         (i) M & R Plastics Inc., a Quebec corporation, which owns all of the
             outstanding capital stock of:

             (a) M&R Plastics Canada, Inc., an Ontario corporation
             (b) Chester Plastics Limited, a Nova Scotia corporation
                  (i) Peak Packaging, Ltd., a Canadian corporation

     9.  Ivex Holdings, Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of England
         and Wales, which owns all of the outstanding capital stock of:

         (i)   Kama Europe Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of
               England and Wales
         (ii)  Ivex Packaging Continental, S.A., a societe anonyme organized
               under the laws of France
         (iii) Ivex Packaging Iberica, S.A., a corporation organized under the
               laws of Spain

     10. Ivex Plastic Packaging B.V., a private corporation organized under the
         laws of The Netherlands

         (i) FTS Holding B.V., a private corporation organized under the laws
             of The Netherlands

             (a) Folietechniek B.V., a private corporation organized under the
                 laws of The Netherlands
             (b) F.T. Vastgood B.V., a private corporation organized under the
                 laws of The Netherlands

     11. MaxPack S.A. de C.V., a corporation organized under the laws of Mexico




     -------------
         Certain of these legal entities also do business under the names of
     Ivex and Kama