alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3080 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3080

 To amend section 5379 of title 5, United States Code, to increase the 
   annual and aggregate limits on student loan repayments by Federal 
                               agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 2003

Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 5379 of title 5, United States Code, to increase the 
   annual and aggregate limits on student loan repayments by Federal 
                               agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Employee Student Loan 
Assistance Act''.

SEC. 2. STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENTS.

    Section 5379(b)(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``$6,000'' and 
        inserting ``$10,000''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``$40,000'' and 
        inserting ``$60,000''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q (the "the  Report")  of
Clearfield, Inc. a Minnesota corporation. (the "Company"), for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the  "Report"),  the undersigned  officer of the Company  certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, that, to his knowledge

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly represents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



February 9, 2009            /s/ Bruce G. Blackey
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Bruce G. Blackey, Chief Financial Officer
                            (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Duly
                            Authorized Officer)


                                       19
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, being the ChiefExecutive Officer of ProLogis (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”), whichaccompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.        Dated:  March 15, 2005 By:  /s/ JEFFREY H. SCHWARTZ    Name:  Jeffrey H. Schwartz    Title:  Chief Executive Officer
```

[110th Congress Public Law 52]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ052.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 264]]

Public Law 110-52
110th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Aug. 
                      1, 2007 -  [H.J. Res. 44]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RENEWAL <<NOTE: 50 USC 1701 note.>> OF IMPORT RESTRICTIONS 
            UNDER BURMESE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY ACT OF 2003.

    Congress approves the renewal of import restrictions contained in 
section 3(a)(1) of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

SEC. 2. MERCHANDISE PROCESSING FEES.

    Section 13031(j)(3)(A) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(j)(3)(A)) is amended by 
striking ``October 14, 2014'' and inserting ``October 21, 2014''.

SEC. 3. TIME FOR PAYMENT OF CORPORATE ESTIMATED TAXES.

    Subparagraph (B) of section 401(1) of the Tax Increase Prevention 
and Reconciliation Act of 2005 <<NOTE: 26 USC 6655 note.>> is amended by 
striking ``114.50 percent'' and inserting ``114.75 percent''.

SEC. 4. <<NOTE: 50 USC 1701 note.>> RULE OF <<NOTE: 19 USC 58c 
            note.>> CONSTRUCTION.

    This joint resolution shall be deemed to be a ``renewal resolution'' 
for purposes of section 9 of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 
2003.

[[Page 121 STAT. 265]]

SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE <<NOTE: 19 USC 58c note.>> DATE.

    This joint resolution and the amendments made by this joint 
resolution shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this joint 
resolution or July 26, 2007, whichever occurs first.

    Approved August 1, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 44:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            July 23, considered and passed House.
            July 24, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
From: Figler, Lyndsey M. [LFigler@tecoenergy.com]

Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 10:29 AM

To: Hofmeister, Art

Cc: Burrows, Byron T.; Lukcic, David M.

Subject: Reference Test Method

Hi Art,

I confirmed that the reference test method for CO2 is method 3A. I am working on getting the

other item.

Thank you,

Lyndsey Figler (Baldyga)

Environmental Health & Safety

Air Programs: Engineer I

Phone: 813

- 228

- 4740

Ext. 34740

Mobile: 813

- 309

- 0376

LFigler@tecoenergy.c om

NOTICE: This email is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have

received this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately, delete this email from your system and do not copy or d isclose it to

any one else. Although we take precautions to protect against viruses, we advise you to take your own precautions to protect agai nst viruses

as we accept no liability for any which remain.
#### Simpson Real Estate Corp. v Firemen’s Insurance Co. of Newark

*614*Welles & Mackie,*for plaintiff.

*Carlon M. O’Malley*and *White, Williams & Scott,*for defendants.

January 11, 1957.

Hoban, P. J.,

This is a companion case to Cleland Simpson Company et al., no. 796, April term, 1956, the decision and opinion in which were filed this day.

Simpson Real Estate Corporation is the landlord of Cleland Simpson Company, leasing to the company one of the properties involved in the other action. This action is upon a policy insuring against loss of rental value. As in the Cleland Simpson case, the basic policy is one of fire insurance, the perils specified are fire and lightning, the clauses limiting the risk to direct consequences are similar, but here the basic policy is modified by an appropriate rider to protect only against loss of rental value caused by damage or destruction due to the perils insured against. The rider contains a clause extending the coverage for a limited time to loss sustained: “When as a direct result of a peril insured against access to the above described building is prohibited by order of civil authority.”

It is conceded that the issues and principles involved are identical in the two cases. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed this day in no. 796, April term, 1956,* we must sustain the preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer and direct judgment for defendants.

*615Now, January 11, 1957, the preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer to the complaint in assumpsit is sustained, and judgment is directed to be entered in favor of defendants.

*

 Page 607, supra.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10067]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

April 13, 2000.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before May 24, 2000 to 
be assured of consideration.

Financial Management Service (FMS)

    OMB Number: 1510-0056.
    Form Number: SF 3881.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: ACH Vendor/Miscellaneous Payment Enrollment Form.
    Description: Payment data will be collected from vendors doing 
business with the Federal Government. Treasury/FMS will use the 
information to electronically transmit payments to vendors' financial 
institutions. The affected public includes (but is not limited to) 
businesses, State/local governments, corporations, educational 
institutions, and other organizations.
    Respondents: Business of other for-profit, Not-for-profit 
institutions, State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 80,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 20,000 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Juanita Holder, Financial Management Service 
3700 East West Highway, Room 144, PGP II, Hyattsville, MD 20782.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-10067 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-P
. ·' 

J ., 

I 

• 

This document contains some 

pages that are of poor quality 

at the time of imaging. . 

...~··" ' '"0"" -· ··~-.-

·.,., ... 

! 
1H IS IS Youa.s .--

WAS SE:IVT TO US 1 tJ £.e.eoR... ... 

GLAD 1D 1-lE:L.P •.. 

:0 

0 

p 

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>      THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY FINANCIAL
              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REGISTRANT'S
              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR ITS SECOND QUARTER 
              OF FISCAL YEAR 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
              ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH FINANCIAL
              STATEMENTS
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                       11,509
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                10,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                   2,998
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             26,309
<PP&E>                                      129,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              168,927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        21,467
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         64
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (26,041)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                168,927
<SALES>                                      31,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             31,512
<CGS>                                        15,616
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                15,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              3,484
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            7,331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               5,081
<INCOME-TAX>                                    523
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           4,558
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  4,558
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.69

        

</TABLE>
#### HARRIS *v.*THE OHIO INSURANCE COMPANY.

Insurance — other policies — notice—sixth clause of Ohio Insurance policy.

Where there is a clause in the policy of insurance, that if other insurance is effected on the same risk, the insured would give notice to be endorsed on the policy, he must prove that he gave such notice of subsequent policies, or he cannot recover.

The sixth clause in the policy of the Ohio Insurance Company construed.

Covenant on a policy of insurance on dry goods against fire for five months from August, 1829.

Plea. That the plaintiff effected another insurance on the same interest, and gave no notice'to the defendants.

The sixth clause of the policy is, ‘ That persons insuring property at this office must give notice of any other insurance made on their behalf on the same, and cause such other insurance to be endorsed on the policy: in which case each office shall be liable to the payment of a rateable proportion of any loss or damage which may be sustained. And unless such notice is given, the insured will not be entitled to recover in case of loss.’

In the progress of the case, a deposition of one of the plaintiffs, (they having assigned all their interest to trustees for the benefit of their creditors,) was offered in evidence.

*Hammond,*

objected.

*Storer*and *Fox*for plaintiff

to the jury.

Lane, J.

The plaintiffs are liable for costs, and incompetent to testify. The interest, cannot be released by any one pursuing the interest.

*545
      *Hammond,*contra,

insisted that the onus of proving the notice of other insurance was upon the plaintiff.

Lane, J.

to the jury. The policy of insurance is the contract of the parties. They had a right to settle its terms, and they have agreed that if any other insurance is effected on the goods, the insured shall give notice to the defendants, or otherwise not call on them to pay. It is incumbent on the plaintiffs to prove to your satisfaction that they gave the defendants notice of the other insurances, there being no dispute but other insurances were effected; if the evidence satisfies you that notice was given, your verdict should be for the plaintiffs, but if notice was not given, you should find for the defendants.

Yerdict for the defendants.
Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting of the Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) National Advisory Council in January 2000. 

                    All of this meeting will be open and will include a roll call, general announcements and a discussion of the mental health systems in Australia and New Zealand, school violence prevention program activities, consumer affairs, and                     *Mental Health: A Report of                         Start Printed Page 2637                        the Surgeon General*. Public comments are welcome. Please communicate with the individual listed as contact below for guidance. If anyone needs special accommodations for persons with disabilities please notify the contact listed below.                 

A summary of the meeting and a roster of Council members may be obtained from Ms. Patricia Gratton, Committee Management Officer, CMHS, Room 11C-26, Parklawn Building, Rockville, Maryland 20857, telephone (301) 443-7987. 

*Committee Name:*                     CMHS National Advisory Council.                 

*Meeting Dates:*                     January 20-21, 2000.                 

*Place(s):*                     The DoubleTree Hotel (1/20/2000), 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.                 

Hilton Washington and Towers (1/21/2000), 1919 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20009. 

*Open:*                     January 20, 9:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m.                 

*Open:*                     January 21, 9:00 a.m.-Adjournment.                 

*Contact:*                     Eileen S. Pensinger, Room 17C-27, Parklawn Building, Telephone: (301) 443-4823 and FAX (301) 443-4865.                 

Dated: January 11, 2000.

S.E. Stephens, 

Acting Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health, Services Administration. 

[FR Doc. 00-1033 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162-20-U
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3570 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3570

  To prohibit the closure or realignment of inpatient services at the 
Aleda E. Lutz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Saginaw, 
Michigan, as proposed under the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced 
                          Services initiative.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2003

  Mr. Kildee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the closure or realignment of inpatient services at the 
Aleda E. Lutz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Saginaw, 
Michigan, as proposed under the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced 
                          Services initiative.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CLOSURE OR REALIGNMENT OF INPATIENT SERVICES 
              AT ALEDA E. LUTZ DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL 
              CENTER IN SAGINAW, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall not carry out the closure 
or realignment of inpatient services at the Aleda E. Lutz Department of 
Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Saginaw, Michigan, as proposed under 
the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES) initiative.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 710
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 710 appear at 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 710.7 Retention of records. ( a ) The board of directors or liquidating agent shall appoint a custodian for the Federal credit union's records which are to be retained after the final distribution of assets.
( b ) All records of the liquidated Federal credit union necessary to establish that creditors were paid and that assets were equitably distributed to the members shall be retained by the custodian for a period of five years following the date of charter cancellation.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 219 (Monday, November 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28789]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Time and Date:  Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 9 a.m.-12 Noon.

Place:  Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status:  Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matter to be Considered: Decisional Matter: Publicly Available Consumer 
Product Safety Information Database--Final Rule.
    A live Webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information:  Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: November 9, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-28789 Filed 11-10-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 745

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 745 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 745.6 Accounts held by a corporation, partnership, or unincorporated association.

Accounts of a corporation, partnership, or unincorporated association engaged in any independent activity shall be insured up to the SMSIA in the aggregate. The account of a corporation, partnership, or unincorporated association not engaged in an independent activity shall be deemed to be owned by the person or persons owning such corporation or comprising such partnership or unincorporated association and, for account insurance purposes, the interest of each person in such an account shall be added to any other account individually owned by such person and insured up to the SMSIA in the aggregate. For purposes of this section, “independent activity” means an activity other than one directed solely at increasing insurance coverage.

[51 FR 37560, Oct. 23, 1986, as amended at 71 FR 14635, Mar. 23, 2006]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3


               FIRST AMENDMENT TO CHILDTIME LEARNING CENTERS, INC.
                   1995 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN FOR KEY EMPLOYEES


         WHEREAS, Childtime Learning Centers, Inc. (the "Company") has
established and maintains the Childtime Learning Centers, Inc. 1995 Stock
Incentive Plan for Key Employees (the "Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph 22 of the Plan, the Board of Directors
of the Company (the "Board") has the right to amend the Plan at any time,
subject to the approval of the shareholders of the Company, for any lawful
purpose; and

         WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of
shares reserved for issuance under the Plan from 300,000 shares to 600,000
shares of Common Stock of the Company.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and by resolution of
the Board, subject to the approval of the Company's shareholders, the Plan is
hereby amended in the following respects:

         1.  Paragraph 1(h) is hereby amended in its entirety to read:

                  (h) "Plan" shall mean the Childtime Learning Centers, Inc.
                  1995 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees, as amended by
                  this First Amendment.

         2.  The first sentence of Paragraph 5 is hereby amended in its entirety
             to read:

                  MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN: The maximum number
                  of shares with respect to which stock options may be granted
                  or which may be awarded as restricted stock under the Plan
                  shall be 600,000 shares in the aggregate of Common Stock of
                  the Corporation.

                  The remainder of Paragraph 5 shall remain in full force and
                  effect.

         All other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force
and effect.

         This First Amendment to the Plan shall be effective on the date of
adoption by the Board of Directors; provided that the shareholders of the
Corporation approve this First Amendment within twelve months after its adoption
by the Board of Directors.

As adopted by the Board of Directors on May 9, 2000
And by the Stockholders on August 15, 200