alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24174-24175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10307]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration


Advisory Committee Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given of the 
following committee meeting:

    Name: Grain Inspection Advisory Committee.
    Date: May 16-17, 2000.

[[Page 24175]]

    Place: DoubleTree Hotel-Lloyd Center, 1000 N.E. Multnomah, 
Portland, Oregon.
    Time: 8:00 am-5:00 pm on May 16 and 8:00 am-11:30 am on May 17, 
2000.
    Purpose: To provide advice to the Administrator of the Grain 
Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) with 
respect to the implementation of the U.S. Grain Standards Act (7 
U.S.C. 71 et seq.).
    The agenda includes a review and discussion of GIPSA's financial 
status, reauthorization, biotechnology, research and information 
technology strategies, and other related issues concerning the 
delivery of grain inspection and weighing services to American 
agriculture.
    Public participation will be limited to written statements, 
unless permission is received from the Committee Chairman to orally 
address the Committee. Persons, other than members, who wish to 
address the Committee or submit written statements before or after 
the meeting, should contact the Administrator, GIPSA, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, STOP 3601, 
Washington, DC 20250-3601, telephone (202) 720-0219 or FAX (202) 
205-9237.

    The meeting will be open to the public. Persons with disabilities 
who require alternative means of communication of program information 
or related accommodation should contact Marianne Plaus, telephone (202) 
690-3460 or FAX (202) 205-9237.

    Dated: April 19, 2000.
James R. Baker,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-10307 Filed 4-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-EN-P
# Iris Oifigiúil C 463I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | C 463I |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 6416 Samhain 2021 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

C 463I

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

6416 Samhain 2021

---

| Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Fógraí |
| | FÓGRAÍ Ó INSTITIÚIDÍ, Ó CHOMHLACHTAÍ, Ó OIFIGÍ, AGUS Ó GHNÍOMHAIREACHTAÍ AN AONTAIS EORPAIGH |
| | An Coimisiún Eorpach |
| 2021/C 463 I/01 | Ceapachán Oifigeach Éisteachta in imeachtaí iomaíochta áirithe | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

IV   Fógraí

FÓGRAÍ Ó INSTITIÚIDÍ, Ó CHOMHLACHTAÍ, Ó OIFIGÍ, AGUS Ó GHNÍOMHAIREACHTAÍ AN AONTAIS EORPAIGH

An Coimisiún Eorpach

2021/C 463 I/01

Ceapachán Oifigeach Éisteachta in imeachtaí iomaíochta áirithe

1

---

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

IV Fógraí

FÓGRAÍ Ó INSTITIÚIDÍ, Ó CHOMHLACHTAÍ, Ó OIFIGÍ, AGUS Ó GHNÍOMHAIREACHTAÍ AN AONTAIS EORPAIGH

An Coimisiún Eorpach

| 16.11.2021 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | CI 463/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2021

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

CI 463/1

---

Ceapachán Oifigeach Éisteachta in imeachtaí iomaíochta áirithe

(2021/C 463 I/01)

Tar éis aistrithe an tUasal Wouter WILS, cheap an Coimisiún an tUasal Eric GIPPINI FOURNIER mar Oifigeach Éisteachta le héifeacht ón 1 Nollaig 2021, i gcomhréir le Cinneadh ó Uachtarán an Choimisiúin Eorpaigh an 13 Deireadh Fómhair 2011, maidir le feidhm an oifigigh éisteachta agus na téarmaí tagartha a bhaineann leis i gcás imeachtaí iomaíochta áirithe (IO L 275, 20.10.2011, lch. 29).

---
#### SEELY *v.*BLAIR.

Appeal — nonsuit—motion to quash.

An appeal lies from the Court of Common Pleas by the plaintiff, after a nonsuit ordered by the court.

Appeal from the Common Pleas by the plaintiff.

*J. H. Paine*and *G. Tod,*

moved to quash the appeal, because it appeared by the record that the plaintiff became nonsuit in the Common Pleas: (2 *O. R.*87; 4 O. *R.*200.)

*P. Hitchcock,*contra.

Br the Court.

It appears by the record that the plaintiff became nonsuit by *order*of the Court of Common Pleas, not of his own mere motion. In such cases, the law especially provides that an appeal maybe taken: (29 *O. L.*75; 2 *O. R.*87.)

Motion denied.
televoke
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                          612 Howard Street * Suite 300
                        San Francisco * California 94105
                   Main 415. 908.4400 * Facsimile 415.908.4450

April 26, 2001

Mr. Mark Gifford
Concentrax, Inc.
817 Oak Glen, Suite 203
Houston, Texas 77076

Dear Mark:

We will be pleased to provide you with a testing and demonstration system for
you applications. Televoke will provide these services as follows:

     o    Upon receipt of a non-refundable Non-Recurring Expense (NRE) fee of
          $7,500 to establish the test web site and telephone interface. This
          includes a unique branded site (your logo and company name) along with
          a branded Voice User Interface (VUI). Please not that the VUI welcome
          greeting will use a TTS (text-to-speech) implementation of your
          company name until a recording session can provide a standard sound
          file. Our recording sessions are held about every 2 - 2 1/2 weeks.

     o    Only the Televoke basic feature set will be supported (notification,
          control and tracking) and standard Televoke data packet definitions
          for the Aeris network will be used. Televoke will review any
          non-standard packet definitions and provide an estimate of the time
          and dollars necessary to use another definition. Televoke will also
          review any requests for non-standard services and provide an estimate
          of time and dollars to implement on the test system.

     o    The web site and VUI will be available for up to 90 days.

     o    As your applications is not commercial (as defined by Aeris.net) there
          is a need for Aeris Developer MIN to support the date sent from and to
          your device. This charge is an additional $50.00 per month, per
          device.

     o    the $7,500 will be applied towards the NRE for a commercial
          implementation when you choose to go forward with Televoke.

By signing below, both of us agree that a complete agreement between us will
need to be signed before commercial implementation.

This offer will expire if not accepted by May 3, 2001. We thank you for you
interest in Televoke and are looking forward to a mutually rewarding
relationship.

Sincerely,

     /s/   Ray Grefe

RAY GREFE
VP of Business Development, Televoke, Inc.

Customer Name: Concentrax, Inc.

By:   /s/   Mark Gifford
      ------------------

Name (type or print): MARK GIFFORD

Date:  April 30, 2000
# L_2008240EN.01S00301.xml

| 9.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 240/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 240/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
§ 792.02 What records does NCUA make available to the public for inspection and copying? Except for records that are exempt from public disclosure under FOIA as amended (5 U.S.C. 552) or are promptly published and copies are available for purchase, NCUA routinely makes the following five types of records available for you to inspect and copy and in an electronic format: ( a ) Final opinions, including concurring and dissenting opinions, and orders made in the adjudication of cases;
( b ) Statements of policy and interpretations which have been adopted by the agency but not published in the Federal Register;
( c ) Administrative staff manuals and instructions to staff that affect a member of the public;
( d ) Copies of all records, regardless of form or format, which have been released after March 31, 1997, in response to a FOIA request and which, because of the nature of their subject matter, NCUA determines have been or are likely to become the subject of subsequent requests; or records that have been requested three (3) or more times; and
( e ) Indices of the documents referred to in this paragraph.
[63 FR 14338, Mar. 25, 1998, as amended at 81 FR 93794, Dec. 22, 2016; 82 FR 29712, June 30, 2017]
#### § 615.5360 Reconsideration based on change in circumstances.

Upon a change in circumstances, an institution may request the Farm Credit Administration to reconsider the terms of its capital directive or may propose changes in the plan to achieve the institution's applicable minimum capital ratios. The Farm Credit Administration also may take such action on its own motion. The Farm Credit Administration may decline to consider requests or proposals that are not based on a significant change in circumstances or are repetitive or frivolous. Pending a decision on reconsideration, the capital directive and plan shall continue in full force and effect.
EXHIBIT A

Schedule of Claims Subject to the Five Hundred Fifty-Eighth Omnibus Objection 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23093-1 Filed:12/16/22 Entered:12/16/22 18:45:28 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 2
NAME

FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY EIGHTH OMNIBUS OBJECTION

Exhibit A – Duplicate Liabilities

CLAIM # CLAIM AMOUNT

CASE NUMBER/

 DEBTOR

DATE 

FILED

CLAIMS TO BE DISALLOWED REMAINING CLAIMS

NAME CLAIM # CLAIM AMOUNT

CASE NUMBER/

 DEBTOR

DATE 

FILED

BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF PMC 

MARKETING CORP. BANK. 

CASE NO. 09-02048

NOREEN WISCOVITCHRENTAS, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE

PMB 136 400 CALLE JUAN 

CALAF

SAN JUAN, PR 00918

1 PUERTO RICO 10198

ELECTRIC 

POWER 

AUTHORITY

5/2/2018

17-03283

$1,154,734.06 PMC MARKETING CORP.

ATTN: RAFAEL A. GONZALEZ 

VALIENTE

GODREAU & GONZALEZ LAW

P.O. BOX 9024176

SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4176

PUERTO RICO 166452

ELECTRIC 

POWER 

AUTHORITY

5/24/2018 $1,154,734.06

17-03283

Reason: Proof of Claim asserts liabilities which are duplicative of another filed Proof of Claim.

BLUE BEETLE III, LLC C/O 

ELAM LLC

C/O ISMAEL H. HERRERO III, 

ESQ.

P.O. BOX 362159

SAN JUAN, PR 00936

2 PUERTO RICO 180510

ELECTRIC 

POWER 

AUTHORITY

8/31/2022

17-03283

$160,121,820.08 BLUUE BEETLE III, LLC C/O 

ELAM LLC

C/O ISMAEL H. HERRERO III, 

ESQ.

P.O. BOX 362159

SAN JUAN, PR 00936

PUERTO RICO 180509

ELECTRIC 

POWER 

AUTHORITY

8/31/2022 $160,121,820.08

17-03283

Reason: Proof of Claim asserts liabilities which are duplicative of another filed Proof of Claim.

RODRIGUEZ LABOY, ANDRES

HC-65 BOX 6395

PATILLAS, PR 00723

3 PUERTO RICO 10752

ELECTRIC 

POWER 

AUTHORITY

5/11/2018

17-03283

$10,000.00 LABOY, ANDRES RODRIGUEZ

PO BOX 201

ARROYO, PR 00714

PUERTO RICO 60575

ELECTRIC 

POWER 

AUTHORITY

6/6/2018 $10,000.00

17-03283

Reason: Proof of Claim asserts liabilities which are duplicative of another filed Proof of Claim.

YFN YABUCOA SOLAR LLC

C/O ISMAEL H. HERRERO III, 

ESQ.

P.O. BOX 362159

SAN JUAN, PR 00936

4 PUERTO RICO 179661

ELECTRIC 

POWER 

AUTHORITY

10/20/2021

17-03283

$155,814,657.86 YFN YABUCOA SOLAR LLC

C/O ISMAEL H. HERRERO III, 

ESQ.

P.O. BOX 362159

SAN JUAN, PR 00936

PUERTO RICO 179660

ELECTRIC 

POWER 

AUTHORITY

10/20/2021 $155,814,657.86

17-03283

Reason: Proof of Claim asserts liabilities which are duplicative of another filed Proof of Claim.

Page 1 of 1

* - Indicates claim contains unliquidated and/or undetermined amounts.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23093-1 Filed:12/16/22 Entered:12/16/22 18:45:28 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6280

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff -Appellee,

versus

ALFREDO SIMPSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CR-90-67-3)

Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 6, 2002

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfredo Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alfredo Simpson appeals the district court’s orders denying

his “Motion to Vacate Judgement[sic] Under Rule 12(b)(2)” and his

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Simpson, No. CR-90-67-3 (E.D.N.C. June 26, 2001;

Oct. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
!W-/¥

COA# 08-12-00295-CR OFFENSE: 21.11

Luke Stanton v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Denton

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM

DATE: 10/10/14

TRIAL COURT: 211th District Court

Publish: NO TC CASE #: F-2011-1913-C

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ELECTRONIC RECORD

Luke Stanton v. The State of

STYLE: Texas CCA#:

PRO SE Petition CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY RFVIFW IN CCA IS- DATF:

££/Vj,e1> JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

DATE: 07\0^l^0\r

JUDGE: f,W (jAAAjtlr—

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

1
§ 703.8 Broker-dealers. ( a ) A Federal credit union may purchase and sell investments through a broker-dealer as long as the broker-dealer is registered as a broker-dealer with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*) or is a depository institution whose broker-dealer activities are regulated by a Federal or State regulatory agency.
( b ) Before purchasing an investment through a broker-dealer, a Federal credit union must analyze and annually update the following: ( 1 ) The background of any sales representative with whom the Federal credit union is doing business;
( 2 ) Information available from State or Federal securities regulators and securities industry self-regulatory organizations, such as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the North American Securities Administrators Association, about any enforcement actions against the broker-dealer, its affiliates, or associated personnel; and
( 3 ) If the broker-dealer is acting as the Federal credit union's counterparty, the ability of the broker-dealer and its subsidiaries or affiliates to fulfill commitments, as evidenced by capital strength, liquidity, and operating results. The Federal credit union should consider current financial data, annual reports, external assessments of creditworthiness, relevant disclosure documents, and other sources of financial information.
( c ) The requirements of paragraph (a) of this section do not apply when the Federal credit union purchases a certificate of deposit or share certificate directly from a bank, credit union, or other depository institution.
[68 FR 32960, June 3, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 39831, July 1, 2004; 77 FR 74109, Dec. 13, 2012; 84 FR 1606, Feb. 5, 2019]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee*: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Sibling Donor Cord Blood Banking and Transplantation.                    

*Date*: May 9, 2000.                    

*Time*: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda*: To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place*: NIH, Rockledge II, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person*: Robert B. Moore, Scientific Review Administrator, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Rockledge Building II, Suite 7192, MSC 7924, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/435-3541.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 19, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-10406  Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### HOSMER *v.*WILLIAMS.

Error — bill of exceptions — 7amendments after error. .

A court of error will take no notice of a bill of exceptions returned with the papers, unless incorporated into the final record, according to the statute.

The court of error has no power, under our law, to allow amendments, even in matters of form, after writ of error brought.

Error. There were several errors complained of, which were set forth in a bill of exceptions, returned with the record. One was, that the judgment was for a greater sum than was demanded in the writ and declaration. •

*Willey,*for the plaintiff in error.

*Andrews*and Hitchcock, contra.

By the Court.

As to all the matters that are set forth in the bill of exceptions, and which only appear there, we can take no notice of them, because the bill of exceptions forms no part of the record. It has been repeatedly decided, that if a party would avail himself of a bill of exceptions, he must have jt recorded under our law; 29 *O. L. 75.*

The other error is fatal. Our statute of amendments limits the right to amend to *some time before writ of error*brought, and does not extend beyond; 29 *O. L. 77.*We have no power to amend, or to disregard even matters of form, after writ of error.

The judgment is reversed, in all things, since the finding of the verdict, and remanded for further proceedings.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10336]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2216-000]


New York Power Authority; Notice of Public Information Meetings

April 20, 2000.
    Citizens, civic organizations, and local governments continue to 
demonstrate an overwhelming interest in how they can participate 
effectively in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
relicensing process for the New York Power Authority's (NYPA) Robert 
Moses Niagara Project No. 2216. NYPA's current license for this project 
expires in August 2007. Consequently, Commission staff will continue to 
hold public information meetings in the project area to familiarize the 
public with the Commission's hydropower relicensing process. The next 
two such meetings will be held as indicated below.
    While there will be an opportunity for questions and answers about 
the Commission staff's presentation, questions and discussions on the 
merits of the Robert Moses Niagara Project are discouraged.
    Interested persons are invited to attend either or both sessions 
scheduled as follows:

Thursday, May 4, 2000, 1 to 3 p.m., Earl W. Brydges Library, 1425 Main 
Street, Auditorium, Niagara Falls, NY 14301, (716) 286-4894
Thursday, May 4, 2000, 6:30 to 9 p.m., Niagara County Community 
College, Building E, Room E142, 3111 Saunders Settlement Road, Sanborn, 
NY 14132, (716) 614-6222

    Please direct any questions regarding these meetings to Patti 
Leppert-Slack, Commission staff, at (202) 219-2767, or e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4030213432292329216e2c253030253234332c21232b00262532236e2625246e3533"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="16667762647f757f77387a736666736462657a77757d567073647538707372386365">[email protected]</span></a>.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10336 Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
###### Editorial Note on Part 708b

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 708b appear at 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019, and at 85 FR 62213, Oct. 2, 2020.

#### § 708b.107 Certification of vote on merger proposal.

The board of directors of the merging federal credit union must certify the results of the membership vote to the Regional Director within 10 days after the vote is taken. The certification must include the total number of members of record of the credit union, the number who voted on the merger, the number who voted in favor, and the number who voted against. If the continuing credit union is non-federally insured, the merging credit union must use the certification form in subpart C of this part unless the Regional Director approves the use of a different form.

[70 FR 3288, Jan. 24, 2005, as amended at 75 FR 81394, Dec. 28, 2010]