alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3464 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3464

  To amend the Social Security Act to provide for coverage under the 
        Medicare Program of audiologic rehabilitation services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 6, 2003

  Mr. Inslee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Social Security Act to provide for coverage under the 
        Medicare Program of audiologic rehabilitation services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Audiologic Rehabilitation 
Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF AUDIOLOGIC REHABILITATION SERVICES.

    (a) Expansion of Audiology Services.--Section 1861(ll)(2) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(ll)(2)) is amended by inserting 
``and such rehabilitation and treatment services'' after ``hearing and 
balance assessment services''.
    (b) Conforming Coverage Amendments.--
            (1) Coverage.--Section 1861(s)(2) of the Social Security 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)) is amended--
                    (A) in subparagraph (U), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in subparagraph (V) by inserting ``and'' at the 
                end; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraph:
                    ``(W) audiology services (as defined in subsection 
                (ll)(2));''.
            (2) Payment.--Section 1848(j)(3) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
        1395w-4(j)(3)) is amended by inserting ``(2)(W),'' after 
        ``(2)(S),''.
            (3) Exception from current exclusion for hearing aid 
        examinations.--Section 1862(a)(7) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
        1395y(a)(7)) is amended by inserting after ``hearing aids or 
        examinations therefor'' the following: ``(other than 
        rehabilitation and treatment services described in section 
        1861(ll)(2) whether furnished by an audiologist or a 
        physician)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to services furnished on or after January 1, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
#### WELLS *v.*BENEFIELD.

Sheriff’s return — amended—explained—not varied by return on another writ.

The return by a sheriff on process, is prima facie evidence against him.

'Courts may permit returns to be amended according to the trouble, and perhaps will admit explanatory evidence.

But a sheriff who has returned a levy, cannot by return on a venditioni exponas that the levy was not made exonerate himself, such return is a mere certificate of a party to a suit, and not evidence in his favor.

Debt upon an appeal bond. Plea, that execution had been sued out on the judgment against the principal debtor, which was levied upon 200 cords of bark, of value more than sufficient to satisfy the judgment, and which remained on hand unsold. Replication, that all the property levied upon was sold, and was insufficient to satisfy the judgment. On this'replication issue was joined.

To prove the issue for the defendant, he offered in evidence a writ of fi. fa. with a levy upon 200 cords of bark, returned upon it by the sheriff, which remained unsold for want of time. The plaintiff then offered a writ of venditioni exponas, sued out upon the levy, and the return of the sheriff that he had sold 20 cords of bark, and that the remaining 180 cords had not been levied upon. This was objected to by the defendant, as far as it regarded the 180 cords, as not being evidence.

By the Court.

The evidence is inadmissible. The return of . the levy binds the officer, at least until set aside or explained by evidence. The court from which the process issued, might on proper evidence permit the return to • be amended. Or possibly this court would hear evidence to explain a return on an execution offered in evidence, but the matter now offered is no evidence. It is but a certificate of a sheriff made to exonerate -himself from liability. He had no authority to make such a return.

The plaintiff submitted to a lion suit.
#### § 616.6500 Investment in leased assets.

An institution may acquire property to be leased that is consistent with current or planned leasing programs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,824
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,273
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,993
<INVENTORY>                                     97,519
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               206,659
<PP&E>                                         465,771
<DEPRECIATION>                                 199,457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 640,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          137,460
<BONDS>                                        434,902
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           209
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   640,587
<SALES>                                        643,026
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               643,026
<CGS>                                          489,969
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  489,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,757
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,168
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,926
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,242
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,242
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20


</TABLE>
**GAO-08-82G**                      Published: Oct 01, 2007. Publicly Released: Oct 01, 2007.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

This publication has been superseded by GAO-08-586G, Financial Audit Manual: Volume 2, July 2008. The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency (PCIE) maintain the GAO/PCIE Financial Audit Manual (FAM). The FAM provides guidance for performing financial statement audits of federal entities. The FAM is a key tool for enhancing accountability over taxpayer-provided resources.

## Full Report

Full Report (361 pages)

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Auditing and Financial Management

Auditing proceduresAuditing standardsAuditorsAuditsFinancial statement auditsFederal agenciesInternal auditorsInternal auditsFinancial statementsFinancial audit
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23



Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Innovir Laboratories Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statements (Nos. 33-
74016; 33-86022; and 33-93608) on Form S-8 and registration statements (Nos.
333-01078 and 333012865) on Form S-3 of our report dated March 23, 1998,
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Innovir Laboratories Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statement of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which
report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Innovir
Laboratories Inc.


KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Wilmington, Delaware
March 30, 1998
June 25 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M

- 30

Room W12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

To Whom I t May Concern:

Reference: DOT Docket FAA

- 2001

- 10876, FAA Exemption No. 6541N, Operation of EAA’s B

17 and Spirit of St. Louis for Historical Flight and Education Purposes.

The Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA) is the world leader in recreational aviation. With

an international membersh ip o f more than 180,000 people , EAA brings together pilots, aircraft builders, owners, and aviation enthusiasts who are dedicated to sharing the Spirit of Aviation by promoting the continued growth of aviation, the preservation of its history

, and a commit ment to
its future.

All conditions and limitations contained within this FAA exemption remain valid, as does the historic and educational flight purposes for flying the EAA B

- 17, N5017N, and the EAA Ryan replica Spirit of St. Louis, NX211, as authorized b y the existing exemption, 6541N

.

Therefore, EAA is requesting the exemption be renewed as it continues to be in the best interest of the public.

Sincerely,

Mackenzie Dickson EAA Government Advocacy Specialist
Exhibit
        32.1
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of APA Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anil K. Jain, Chief
        Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002, that:
  1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  August
        10, 2006
 
 Signature: /s/
        Anil K. Jain
 Print
        Name: Anil
        K. Jain
 Print
        Title: Chief
        Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
July 31, 2015

Mr. Dennis Taetsch

8345 Bent Pine Drive

Lake Ann, MI 49650

Dear Mr. Taetsch:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 61.113(a) and (b); 91.119(c); 91.151(a); 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(2); 91.417(a) 

and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA−2015−1041) on 

April 15, 2015, but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you 

sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the 

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
Schedule D

List of Main Statutes Preempted by PROMESA

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23630-4 Filed:02/26/23 Entered:02/26/23 23:59:57 Desc:

Schedule D Page 1 of 3
2

List of Main Statutes Preempted by PROMESA1

Statutory Provisions Bondholder Rights and Remedies

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 207 (providing bondholders a right to receivership in certain

circumstances)

2. 22 L.P.R.A. § 208 (providing bondholders certain rights and remedies against PREPA)

Statutory Provisions Concerning Issuance and Terms of Bonds 

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 195a-1(o), as amended by Act 17-2019, to require PREB approval of bond

issuances under certain circumstances.

2. Act 101-2020 (providing AAFAF certain approval rights over bond issuances by Puerto

Rico instrumentalities)

Statutes Concerning Means of Implementation of the Plan 

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 195a-1(u), as amended by Act 17-2019, to require PREB approval for,

among other things, the sale or transfer of PREPA’s property, and may include

limitations on the creation of subsidiaries or trusts, or the taking of any actions or

measures as are necessary or convenient to exercise PREPA’s power granted under its

enabling act.

Statutes Concerning the Contribution in Lieu of Taxes and subsidies 

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 212(b), to establish the Contribution in Lieu of Taxes (CILT) mechanism

by which PREPA compensate municipalities.

2

2. 22 L.P.R.A. § 814, to establish limitations to the future creation of any new electric

power service subsidy, credit, or grant.3

Statutes Concerning Retirement

1. Act 106-2017 (to the extent it does not allow participants in the PREPA ERS to

participate in the Act 106 defined contribution plan).

Statutes enacted prior to PROMESA concerning the Restructuring of PREPA’s debt 

1

 The statutes listed herein are preempted for the reasons and solely to the extent set forth in Exhibit “A” to the 

Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

The Debtor reserves the right to amend this list prior to the entry of the PREPA Confirmation Order.

2 This provision is preempted solely to the extent it could be interpreted to exempt municipalities from paying the 

Legacy Charge. 

3 This provision is preempted solely to the extent it could be interpreted to restrict the creation of a new subsidy for

low-income customers relating to the Legacy Charge. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23630-4 Filed:02/26/23 Entered:02/26/23 23:59:57 Desc:

Schedule D Page 2 of 3
3

1. 22 L.P.R.A § 1054x-1 (establishing the procedure by which the PREB had to determine 

and review the transition charges and adjustment mechanisms).

2. 22 L.P.R.A § 1054b(q) (to the extent, if any, it provides PREB certain approval review 

and approval over PREPA bond issuances under Title III). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23630-4 Filed:02/26/23 Entered:02/26/23 23:59:57 Desc:

Schedule D Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT B

SUMMARY OF FTI CONSULTING, INC. HOURS WORKED AND FEES INCURRED BY PROFESSIONAL BY LOCATION

FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 1, 2022 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2022

Mainland On-island Total

Professional Position

Blended 

Billing Rate Hours Fees Hours Fees

Total

Hours

Total

Fees

Gumbs, Sean Senior Managing Director $ 1,200 13.1 $ 15,720.00 - $ - 13.1 $ 15,720.00

Hu, Ji Yon Senior Managing Director 1,050 1.3 1,365.00 - - 1.3 1,365.00

Sombuntham, Natalie Director 865 41.8 36,157.00 - - 41.8 36,157.00

Hellmund-Mora, Marili Manager 300 1.1 330.00 - - 1.1 330.00

SUBTOTAL 57.3 $ 53,572.00 - $ - 57.3 $ 53,572.00

Less: 50% discount for non-working travel time - - -

GRAND TOTAL $ 53,572.00 $ - $ 53,572.00

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22868-2 Filed:11/15/22 Entered:11/15/22 14:38:54 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 1 of 1
# EXHIBIT 23.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement No. 33-95704, No. 33-79960, and No. 333-41639 of
Department 56, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 16, 2005,
relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Department 56,
Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph related to a change in accounting method as discussed in Note 1),
and managements report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of January 1, 2005, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Department
56, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended January 1, 2005.

Minneapolis, Minnesota March 16, 2005

---
§ 746.112 Retaliation prohibited. ( a ) *Retaliation prohibited.* NCUA staff may not retaliate against an insured credit union making any type of appeal. Alleged acts of retaliation should be reported to the NCUA Office of Inspector General, which is authorized to receive and investigate complaints and other information regarding abuse in agency programs and operations.
( b ) *Submission of complaints.* Insured credit unions may submit complaints of suspected retaliation to the NCUA Office of Inspector General, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428. Complaints should include an explanation of the circumstances surrounding the complaint and evidence of any retaliation. Information submitted as part of a complaint shall be kept confidential.
( c ) *Disciplinary action.* Any retaliation by NCUA staff will subject the employee to appropriate disciplinary or remedial action by the appropriate supervisor. Such disciplinary or remedial action may include oral or written warning or admonishment, reprimand, suspension or separation from employment, change in assigned duties, or disqualification from a particular assignment, including prohibition from participating in any examination of the insured credit union that was the subject of the retaliation.
<PAGE>   1
Duane Kimble                                Ken Di Paola or Joel Pomerantz
Baldwin Piano & Organ Company               The Dilenschneider Group
(513) 754-4647                              (212) 922-0900



                     BALDWIN PIANO NAMES ROBERT J. JONES CEO


         MASON, Ohio, April 27, 2000 - The board of directors of Baldwin Piano &
Organ Company (NASDAQ: BPAO) today announced the immediate appointment of music
industry veteran Robert J. Jones to the position of chief executive officer. Mr.
Jones succeeds Karen L. Hendricks, who announced in February that she would step
down as CEO. Ms. Hendricks will remain a member of Baldwin's board.

         Mr. Jones was also named to the board of directors. He will fill the
vacancy left by the departure of New York financier John H. Gutfreund, who
oversaw the CEO selection process on behalf of the board.

         Mr. Jones is a long-time veteran of the music industry. Prior to
accepting Baldwin's offer, he was executive vice president, general manager and
chief operating officer of Samick Music Corp., a maker and marketer of pianos,
guitars and professional audio systems.

         Baldwin Piano & Organ Company, the maker of America's best selling
pianos, has marketed keyboard musical products for over 140 years.

                                      # # #

"Safe Harbor" statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995: This release contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks
and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the impact of competitive
products and pricing, product demand and market acceptance, reliance on key
strategic alliances, fluctuations in operating results and other risks detailed
from time to time in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
#### MID-CONTINENT PIPE LINE CO. et al. v. OKMULGEE COUNTY EXCISE BOARD.

No. 30859.

Oct. 20, 1942.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 8, 1942.

*131 P. 2d 753.*

Mastín Geschwind, of Oklahoma City, for plaintiffs in error.

Jack Pitchford, County Atty., of Okmulgee, for defendant in error.

WELCH, C. J.

This appeal involves protests based upon the contention that appropriations for school districts Nos. 8, 12, and 45 of Okmulgee county are excessive because total valuations in the district were not as great as the total assessed valuations employed by the excise board in calculating the rates of levy.

These are the same school districts from which parts of territory were taken by annexation as shown and discussed in case No. 30860, the Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County, Excise Board, decided this date by this court, 191 Okla. 586, 131 P. 2d 745. That case and the present case are briefed as one on the issues herein. Our views and conclusion therein dispose of the question presented here.

Judgment affirmed.

OSBORN, BAYLESS, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. HURST, J., concurs in result. GIBSON, J., dissents. CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, J., absent.