alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Matter of Johnson Street

*Augustus R. Sigismondi,*for exceptants.

*411December 18, 1956

Reimel, J.,

This matter comes before the court upon exceptions of the City of Philadelphia to a report of the board of view. On March 11, 1947, an ordinance of city council was approved which authorized the opening of the portion of Johnson Street from Thouron Avenue to Limekiln Turnpike. This portion of Johnson Street had been legally opened by dedication by deed dated February 18, 1875. Notice of this ordinance of March 11, 1947, was served upon the predecessors in title to the properties under discussion on April 17, 1947, and May 2, 1947. On June 10, 1947, an ordinance of City Council which authorized the grading of this section of Johnson Street was approved. No notice of this ordinance was served upon the parties in interest and no work of grading started until November 4, 1953.

On November 20, 1953, Margaret Reilly filed a petition requesting a board of view be appointed to assess damages caused by this grading. On November 24, 1953, such a board was appointed and after hearings $1,200 was awarded Margaret Reilly and $3,400 to Michael and Archangelo De Paul. It is to the report awarding such damages that the city has filed its exceptions claiming that the statute of limitations had run since the petition for the appointment of a board of view was filed more than six years after the notice of the opening of Johnson Street.

It is true that the Act of May 26, 1891, P. L. 117, sec. 1, 53 PS §1674, requires that all claims for the appropriation of land shall include claims for damages due to grade at which the street is being opened. However, in the case under consideration no right of action arose at the time of the notice of the opening of the street, since the road had been opened by means of dedication in 1875. Likewise, the statute of limitations set forth in the Act of May 23, 1891, P. L. 109, sec. 1, 53 PS §1676, which requires that the petition *412for the assessment of damages be filed within six years of the notice of the opening of the road is inapplicable since at the time of such notice there were no damages that would be' caused by the opening. It is only the grading of the road which would result in damage to the properties involved and since no notice that the road was to be graded was served on the landowners, the statute of limitations had not run when the petition for the appointment of a board of view was filed on November 20, 1953.

It is'for these reasons that the awards of the board of view are affirmed and the exceptions of the city are dismissed.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22654 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/20/22 18:28:50 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 623.6 Duty to file information concerning adverse judicial or administrative action.

Any person appearing or practicing before the FCA who has been or is the subject of a conviction, suspension, debarment, license revocation, injunction or other finding of the kind described in § 623.4 (b) or (c) of this part is an action not instituted by the FCA shall promptly file a copy of the relevant order, judgment or decree with the Board together with any related opinion or statement of the agency or tribunal involved. Any person who fails to file a copy of such an order, judgment or decree within 30 days after the later of the entry of the order, judgment or decree, or the date such person initiates practice before the FCA, for that reason alone may be disqualified from practicing before the FCA until such time as the appropriate filing shall be made, but neither the filing of these documents nor the failure of a person to file them shall in any way impair the operation of any other provision of this part.
#### § 1203b.101 Scope.

This part applies to only those NASA and NASA contractor security force personnel who are authorized to exercise arrest authority in accordance with 51 U.S.C. 20134 and this regulation.

[57 FR 4926, Feb. 11, 1992, as amended at 78 FR 5124, Jan. 24, 2013]
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 1, 2006, of
the Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date: June 29, 2006
    By:
    /s/ SCOTT POTERACKIScott PoterackiChief Financial Officer and Secretary 68
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6700

THERON JOHNNY MAXTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; MS. ASKIN, Nurse,

Kirkland Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-2460-3-6BC)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 9, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theron Johnny Maxton, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra J. Senn, STUCKEY &

KOBROVSKY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Maxton v. Moore,

No. CA-95-2460-3-6BC (D.S.C. Apr. 17, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 10.21**

BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. 

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 

As of January 1, 2009,compensation arrangements for non-employee directors of Barrett Business Services, Inc. (the “Company”), consist of (a) an annual retainer of $24,000 payable in cash in two equal installments on January 1 and July 1 and(b) stock options of 2,000 shares of Company common stock with an exercise price equal to fair market value at the date of grant (January 16, 2009), vesting in four equal annual installments beginning one year following the date of grant andexpiring on January 16, 2019. Each non-employee director is expected to purchase Company common stock in the open market with 40% of his or her annual retainer.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22995 Filed:12/05/22 Entered:12/06/22 18:20:07 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22995 Filed:12/05/22 Entered:12/06/22 18:20:07 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22995 Filed:12/05/22 Entered:12/06/22 18:20:07 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
N/A

 N/A

 N/A

AHIMSA FOUNDATION EXHIBIT B1

PARTY EXHIBIT COVER SHEET

Name of Party

Does the Party intend to offer evidence?

Docket Entry No. for Party Exhibit List

Is there a pending request to seal 

this Exhibit?

Exhibit Identifier2 Docket Entry No. of Exhibit

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Local Rule 9037-1(a), parties and counsel are solely responsible for 

redacting the personal identifiers enumerated in Fed. R. Bank. P. 9037(a).

1 This Party Exhibit Cover Sheet must be attached to a party-in-interest’s Informative 

Motion as Exhibit B.

2 Each Exhibit should be named in sequential party-identified numbering (e.g., “FOMB 

Ex. 1” or “UCC Ex. A”).

230213 EXHIBIT B. EXHIBIT COVER SHEET VERSION FEBRUARY 13, 2023 1

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23582-2 Filed:02/21/23 Entered:02/21/23 13:46:04 Desc:

Exhibit Ahimsa Exhibit B Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.308 Waiver of hearing; failure to request hearing or review based on written submissions; failure to appear. ( a ) The subject individual may, in writing, waive an oral hearing and instead elect to have the matter determined by the NCUA Board on the basis of written submissions alone.
( b ) Should any concerned party fail to request in writing an oral hearing or consideration based on written submissions alone within 30 days of service of the notice described in § 747.306, he or she will be deemed to have consented to the NCUA Board's action.
( c ) Unless the concerned party appears at the hearing personally or by duly appointed representative, he or she will be deemed to have consented to the NCUA Board's action.
#### MILLER *v.*BEEBE.

Covenant with A, to pay B, who may sue — general rule — exceptions.

A covenant made with B, to pay several sums to C, to B, and to G, may be sued by B, in his own name, i f the money is not paid»

Such an agreement is not by operation of law made with C, B, and G, and to be by them sued. The general rule is, that he alone with whom an express contract is made can sue it; suits on negotiable instruments resulting from the statute, and the cases where the person having the beneficial interest in a contract may sue, form exceptions from the rule; they do not establish a new one.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas. Beebe declared'in the Common Pleas, that on the 9th of September, 1820, Miller and his wife executed to him a mortgage, (which had been lost) by which they conveyed to him a tract of land upon condition, to be void if Miller paid, on or before the 1st of April, 1822, to Rowland Craig, $192 07, to Thomas Bingham $138 04, and to J. G. Gross $198 26, in which he covenanted with Beebe to pay said sums. It was assigned for breach the non payment of either of said sums. To this there was a general demurrer, which was overruled by the court and a final judgment given for the plaintiff.

*Coffinberry*and Bartlett, for the plaintiff in error,

claim that the court erred in overruling the demurrer, and cited 1 *Ch. PI.*2, 5; and 3 *B. and P. 147.*

*Burr*and Parker, contra,

cited 1 *Saund. PI. and Ev.*478; 6 *Maulé and Sel.*77, 575; 3 *B. and P.*335; 5 *T. R.*234; 9 *John. R.*75; 8 *Coke*69; 1 *H. Bl.*81; 7 *T. R.*359, 60, n.\8 *Mass. R.*103.

Wright, J.

The authorities cited by the plaintiff in error do not appear to bear on the real question before us. They go to show in what cases one for whose benefit another covenants with a third person *may*sue directly In his own name. If this were a suit by Craig, Bingham, or Gross, for the money due them, possibly they *432would apply. This covenant was made by Miller with Beebe, to pay-Craig, &c. 'and he now claims that his covenant, though in fact made with Beebe, by operation of law was made with *Craig,*&c. either jointly or severally, and they alone can sue. The general rule is that he *alone*with whom express contracts are made has the legal interest in them, and alone can sue. Suits in the name of the endorsee of negotiable contracts, result from the statute; and the other cases where suits may be brought by the person beneficially interested, do not establish any new rule; they form exceptions from the old one. Beebe here has the legal interest and can sue. 8 *Mass.*103; 5 *O. R.*71.

The judgment is affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 709
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 709 appear at 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 709.2 NCUA Board as liquidating agent. ( a ) The Board, as liquidating agent, by operation of law and without any conveyance or other instrument, act or deed, shall succeed to all the rights, titles, powers, and privileges of the credit union, and of its shareholders, officers, and directors, with respect to the credit union and its assets, and such shareholders, officers, or directors, shall not thereafter have or exercise any such rights, powers, or privileges or act in connection with any assets or property of any nature of the credit union.
( b ) The Board, as liquidating agent, shall take possession of and title to books, records, and assets of every description of such credit union to which such credit union has rights of possession and title to all offices and other facilities of such credit union.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         112,560
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  284,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                   152,214
<INVENTORY>                                    109,845
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               435,368
<PP&E>                                         515,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                 286,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,559,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,558,758
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        225
<COMMON>                                       223,862
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,559,422
<SALES>                                      1,977,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,977,998
<CGS>                                        1,138,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,489,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (640,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (640,320)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (640,320)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 750

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 750 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 750.2 Golden parachute payments prohibited.

A federally insured credit union must not make or agree to make any golden parachute payment, except as permitted by this part.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22827-

En
LTS Doc#:22827-2 Filed:11/04/22 Entered:11/09/22 

Envelope Page 2 of 2
# Úřední věstník C 464A/17.

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 464A |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 6417. listopadu 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 464A

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 6417. listopadu 2021

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | Opravy |
| 2021/C 464 A/01 | Oprava Generální ředitelství pro výzkum a inovace – Vyhlášení výběrového řízení na místo hlavního poradce – předsedy výboru Evropské rady pro inovace (dočasný zaměstnanec – platová třída AD 14) – COM/2021/10408 ( Úř. věst. C 432 A, 26.10.2021 ) | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

Opravy

2021/C 464 A/01

Oprava Generální ředitelství pro výzkum a inovace – Vyhlášení výběrového řízení na místo hlavního poradce – předsedy výboru Evropské rady pro inovace (dočasný zaměstnanec – platová třída AD 14) – COM/2021/10408 ( Úř. věst. C 432 A, 26.10.2021 )

( Úř. věst. C 432 A, 26.10.2021 )

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

Opravy

| 17.11.2021 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CA 464/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2021

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CA 464/1

---

Oprava Generální ředitelství pro výzkum a inovace – Vyhlášení výběrového řízení na místo hlavního poradce – předsedy výboru Evropské rady pro inovace

(dočasný zaměstnanec – platová třída AD 14)

COM/2021/10408

(
  Úřední věstník Evropské unie C 432 A ze dne 26. října 2021
  )

(2021/C 464 A/01)

Strana 5, „Datum uzávěrky“, první odstavec:

| místo: | „Datum uzávěrky registrací je 26. listopadu 2021, 12:00 (poledne) bruselského času. Poté již registrace nebude možná.“, |
| --- | --- |

místo:

„Datum uzávěrky registrací je 26. listopadu 2021, 12:00 (poledne) bruselského času. Poté již registrace nebude možná.“,

| má být: | „Datum uzávěrky registrací je 17. prosince 2021, 12:00 (poledne) bruselského času. Poté již registrace nebude možná.“ |
| --- | --- |

má být:

má být:

„Datum uzávěrky registrací je 17. prosince 2021, 12:00 (poledne) bruselského času. Poté již registrace nebude možná.“

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                             BELL MICROPRODUCTS INC.
            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Numbers 333-39916, 333-45554, 333-62842, 333-85226,
333-107732, 333-108146, 333-116130, 333-117555, and 333-119634), on Form S-4
(Number 333-120527) and on Form S-8 (Numbers 33-66580, 33-83398, 33-95968,
333-10837, 333-41179, 333-58053, 333-51724, 333-72642, and 333-87048) of Bell
Microproducts Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2005 relating to the financial
statements, financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
March 16, 2005
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 318

To amend title 23, United States Code, to require consideration under the 

congestion mitigation and air quality improvement program of the extent 

to which a proposed project or program reduces sulfur or atmospheric 

carbon emissions, to make renewable fuel projects eligible under that 

program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2003

Mr. SHIMKUS (for himself, Ms. MCCARTHY of Missouri, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. KIRK, and Mr. MANZULLO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend title 23, United States Code, to require consideration under the congestion mitigation and air quality 

improvement program of the extent to which a proposed 

project or program reduces sulfur or atmospheric carbon 

emissions, to make renewable fuel projects eligible under 

that program, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Biofuels Air Quality 

5 Act’’. 
2

•HR 318 IH 

1 SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN PROJECT EFFECTS. 

2 Section 149(b) of title 23, United States Code, is 

3 amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘For the pur4 pose of determining eligibility under this section, the Sec5 retary shall consider the extent to which a proposed 

6 project or program reduces sulfur or atmospheric carbon 

7 emissions.’’. 

8 SEC. 3. STATES RECEIVING MINIMUM APPORTIONMENT. 

9 Section 149(c) of title 23, United States Code, is 

10 amended in each of paragraphs (1) and (2) by inserting 

11 before the period at the end the following: ‘‘or for any 

12 project that will provide for the use of renewable fuel de13 scribed in subsection (e)(4)(A)(i)’’. 

14 SEC. 4. RENEWABLE FUEL PROJECTS. 

15 Section 149(e)(4) of title 23, United States Code, is 

16 amended—

17 (1) by inserting ‘‘, publicly owned, or nonprofit18 owned’’ after ‘‘privately owned’’; and 

19 (2) in subparagraph (A) by striking ‘‘the costs 

20 of vehicle’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘the costs 

21 of—

22 ‘‘(i) renewable fuel, consisting of any 

23 fuel produced from grain, oilseeds, or other 

24 biomass (including biodiesel), that is used 

25 to replace or reduce the quantity of fossil 
3

•HR 318 IH 

1 fuel present in a fuel mixture used to oper2 ate motor vehicles; 

3 ‘‘(ii) installation of capital equipment 

4 necessary for the conversion of storage and 

5 distribution facilities to carry renewable 

6 fuels or renewable fuel blends; and 

7 ‘‘(iii) vehicle.’’.

Æ