alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 198 (Thursday, October 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24904]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act

Notification of Item Added to the Agenda, U.S. Railroad Retirement 
Board

    On October 9, 2009, by recorded vote the Board has voted to add the 
following item to its agenda for the October 14, 2009:
    (2) Employer Status Determination (Decision on Reconsideration)--
Trinity Railway Express--Train Dispatching--Herzog Transit Services, 
Inc.
    The person to contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, 
Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    Dated: October 9, 2009.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-24904 Filed 10-13-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 740

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 740 appear at 85 FR 62213, Oct. 2, 2020.

#### § 740.0 Scope.

This part applies to all federally insured credit unions. It prescribes the requirements for the official sign insured credit unions must display and the requirements with regard to the official advertising statement insured credit unions must include in their advertisements. It requires that all other kinds of advertisements be accurate. It also establishes requirements for advertisements of excess insurance.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00018

- CV
ALFONSO KENNARD JR., DANIEL J. SALAS JR., AND KENNARD LAW, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW v. DR. TIBOR TOTH, DMD D/B/A TOTH PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY

On Appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. 2020

- DCL

- 03633

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, vacates the trial court’s judgment of January 11, 2022 order denying appellants' motion to dismiss and dismisses the case. The Court or ders the judgment vacated and the case is DISMISSED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the appellant s

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 19, 2023
1

EXHIBIT A

90-Day Transfers to Defendants

Date Payment Amount

2/8/2017 $441,124 

2/8/2017 $400 

2/14/2017 $442,726 

2/14/2017 $449,143 

2/21/2017 $443,567 

2/21/2017 $448,332 

2/28/2017 $442,663 

2/28/2017 $29,490 

3/7/2017 $441,325 

3/7/2017 $29,480 

3/7/2017 $3,332 

3/7/2017 $6,618 

3/14/2017 $441,146 

3/14/2017 $10,782 

3/28/2017 $8,616 

3/28/2017 $440,388 

3/28/2017 $20,863 

3/28/2017 $11,047 

4/5/2017 $435,530 

4/5/2017 $5,944 

4/12/2017 $443,324 

4/19/2017 $6,250 

4/19/2017 $9,858 

4/26/2017 $441,281 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23439-1 Filed:01/30/23 Entered:01/30/23 19:03:04 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 1
221031 SCH ORD RE O'NEILL POC MOT VERSION OCTOBER 31, 2022 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING OF MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO AMEND PROOF OF CLAIM NUMBER 28744

The Court has received and reviewed the Motion for Leave to Amend Proof of 

Claim Number 28744 (Docket Entry No. 22757 in Case No. 17-3283, the “Motion”), filed by 

O’Neill Security & Consultant Services, Inc. (the “Movant”). 

Responsive papers to the Motion, if any, must be filed by November 7, 2022, 

at 5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). Movant’s reply papers must be filed by November 14, 

2022, at 5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). The Court will thereafter take the Motion on 

submission, unless the Court determines that a hearing is necessary.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 31, 2022 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); 

(iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings 

Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK-5523-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22759 Filed:10/31/22 Entered:10/31/22 12:02:51 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19977-2 Filed:01/31/22 Entered:02/01/22 16:57:30 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 1
§ 622.8 Rules of evidence. ( a ) *Evidence.* Every party shall have the right to present a case or defense by oral and documentary evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts. Irrelevant, immaterial or unduly repetitious evidence shall be excluded.
( b ) *Objections.* Objections to the admission or exclusion of evidence shall be in short form, stating the grounds of objection relied upon but no argument thereon shall be permitted, except as ordered, allowed, or requested by the presiding officer. Rulings on such objections and all other matters shall be part of the transcript. Failure to object timely to the admission or exclusion of evidence or to any ruling constitutes a waiver of such objection.
( c ) *Stipulations.* Independently of the orders or rulings issued as provided by § 622.7(b), the parties may stipulate as to any relevant matters of fact or the authenticity of any relevant documents. Such stipulations may be received in evidence at the hearing, and when so received shall be binding on the parties with respect to the matters therein stipulated.
( d ) *Official notice.* All matters officially noticed by the presiding officer shall appear on the record.
#### WORTH v. WILSON.

Contracts barred in other states — statutes of limitation — depreciated currency — dollar.

. Since 1830, contracts made by non residents, and barred by the statute of limitations of the state where marie, are barred when sued in this state, but the provision for such defence does not reach a suit commenced before its passage and then pending.

Upon a contract to deliver salt, in 1818, it is competent to ask a witness in cross-examination, if he did not estimate by Kentucky currency, then depreciated, and what was the rate of depreciation.

It is incompetent to introduce oral evidence to explain the value of the term dollar, in a contract.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas. The suit below was upon an accepted order for the delivery of salt, drawn and accepted in Virginia in 1818. The defendant pleaded non assumpsit, and the statute of limitations of Virginia; upon which issues were joined. During the trial, a witness under examination proved the value of salt in 1818, in Virginia, to be one dollar a bushel. He was asked ' on cross-examination by the defendant, if the currency of Kentucky, which was the prevailing currency there at that time, was not depreciated below specie. This question was objected to and ruled out. An exception was taken and sealed, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff.

*Nye,*for the plaintiff in error,

made two points on this record to reverse the judgment.

1. That the issue under the statute of limitations of Virginia, was not legal. 2. That the court below erred in rejecting the evidence as to the value of the currency.

*Vinton,*contra.

Wright, J.

The act of 1830, 28 *O. L.*34. contained the first legal provision allowing defendants in this state to plead the statute ‘ of limitations of another state. By that law, when the parties to the contract resided out of this state at the making of the contract, and the suit is barred by the laws of the state where the contract was made, if the defendant afterwards remove into this state, or is sued here, the bar in the state of the contract is made a good defence to an action here. This suit was brought before the passage of that act, and of course is not within its provisions. The plea, therefore, was improperly admitted.

The court below erred also in rejecting the evidence of the depreciation of the currency. The object was to ascertain how much *163money the salt which the defendant agreed to deliver, was worth at the time and place agreed upon for its delivery; and if the witness estimated that' value at a dollar a bushel in Kentucky currency, it was competent to ascertain what relation that currency bore to money. This was not a case of an attempt to explainwhat the term dollar means in a written contract; if it were, it would be inadmissible evidence.

The judgment below is reversed with costs, and the case remanded for further proceedings.
#### § 701.5 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Data Policy and 
Standards Staff, Announces the Following Meeting

    Name: ICD-9-CM Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting.
    Time and Date: 9 a.m.-5 p.m., May 11, 2000.
    Place: The Health Care Financing Administration, Multipurpose room, 
7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland.
    Status: Open to the public.
    Purpose: The ICD-9-CM Coordination and Maintenance (C&M) Committee 
will hold its first meeting of the calendar year 2000 cycle on 
Thursday, May 11, 2000. The C&M meeting is a public forum for the 
presentation of proposed modifications to the International 
Classification of Diseases, Ninth-Revision, Clinical Modification.
    Matters to be Discussed: Agenda items include:

Head injuries
Mammografic microcalcification
Myofascial pain syndrome
Stress Fracture
Periventricular leukomalacia
Posttraumatic wound infection versus complicated open wound
Premature menopause
Update on the ICD-10-PCS coding system
Thoracic aortic aneurysm repair
Lysis of adhesions
Penile plethysmography with nerve stimulation
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (PEJ)
Spinal fusion for pseudoarthosis
Addenda

    Contact Person for Additional Information: Amy Blum, Medical 
Classification Specialist, Data Policy and Standards Staff, NCHS, 6526 
Belcrest Road, Room 1100, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone 301/
458-4106 (diagnosis), Amy Gruber, Health Insurance Specialist, Division 
of Acute Care, HCFA, 7500 Security Blvd., Room C4-07-07, Baltimore, 
Maryland, 21244 telephone 410-786-1542 (procedures).
    Notice: In the interest of security, the H.C.F.A. has instituted 
stringent procedures for entrance into the building by non-government 
employees. Persons without a government I.D. will need to show a photo 
I.D. and sign-in at the security desk upon entering the building.
    Notice: This is a public meeting. However, because of fire code 
requirements, should the number of attendants meet the capacity of the 
room the meeting will be closed.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 18, 2000.
John Burckhardt,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 00-10082 Filed 4-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-18-P
§ 252.77 Exemptions. ( a ) *Exempted exposure categories.* The following categories of credit transactions are exempt from the limits on credit exposure under this subpart: ( 1 ) Any direct claim on, and the portion of a claim that is directly and fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, only while operating under the conservatorship or receivership of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and any additional obligation issued by a U.S. government-sponsored entity as determined by the Board;
( 2 ) Intraday credit exposure to a counterparty;
( 3 ) Any trade exposure to a qualifying central counterparty related to the covered company's clearing activity, including potential future exposure arising from transactions cleared by the qualifying central counterparty and pre-funded default fund contributions;
( 4 ) Any credit transaction with the Bank for International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Finance Corporation, the International Development Association, the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, or the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes;
( 5 ) Any credit transaction with the European Commission or the European Central Bank; and
( 6 ) Any transaction that the Board exempts if the Board finds that such exemption is in the public interest and is consistent with the purpose of this subpart.
( b ) *Exemption for Federal Home Loan Banks.* For purposes of this subpart, a covered company does not include any Federal Home Loan Bank.
( c ) *Additional exemptions by the Board.* The Board may, by regulation or order, exempt transactions, in whole or in part, from the definition of the term “credit exposure,” if the Board finds that the exemption is in the public interest and is consistent with the purpose of 12 U.S.C. 5365(e).
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.1 Scope. This subpart prescribes uniform rules of practice and procedure applicable to adjudicatory proceedings required to be conducted on the record after opportunity for a hearing under the following statutory provisions: ( a ) Cease-and-desist proceedings under section 206(e) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1786(e));
( b ) Removal and prohibition proceedings under section 206(g) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1786(g));
( c ) Assessment of civil money penalties by the NCUA Board against institutions and institution-affiliated parties for any violation of: ( 1 ) Section 202 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1782);
( 2 ) Section 1120 of FIRREA (12 U.S.C. 3349), or any order or regulation issued thereunder;
( 3 ) The terms of any final or temporary order issued under section 206 of the Act or any written agreement executed by the National Credit Union Administration (“NCUA”), any condition imposed in writing by the NCUA in connection with any action on any application, notice, or other request by the credit union or institution-affiliated party, certain unsafe or unsound practices or breaches of fiduciary duty, or any law or regulation not otherwise provided in this section, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1786(k);
( 4 ) Any provision of law referenced in section 102(f) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4012a(f)) or any order or regulation issued thereunder;
( d ) Remedial action under section 102(g) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4012a(g)); and
( e ) This subpart also applies to all other adjudications required by statute to be determined on the record after opportunity for an agency hearing, unless otherwise specifically provided for in subparts B through J of this part.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  ------------


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of The Robert Mondavi Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Henry J.
Salvo, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.


                                    Date:    September 26, 2003
                                             -----------------------------------



                                             /s/ HENRY J. SALVO, JR.
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Henry J. Salvo, Jr.
                                             Executive Vice President / CFO


The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



                                      44
<PAGE>
§ 107.125 Category 3 operations: Operating requirements. To conduct Category 3 operations, a remote pilot in command— ( a ) Must use a small unmanned aircraft that— ( 1 ) Is eligible for Category 3 operations pursuant to § 107.130(a);
( 2 ) Is listed on an FAA-accepted declaration of compliance as eligible for Category 3 operations in accordance with § 107.160; and
( 3 ) Is labeled as eligible for Category 3 operations in accordance with § 107.130(b)(1);
( b ) Must not operate the small unmanned aircraft over open-air assemblies of human beings; and
( c ) May only operate the small unmanned aircraft above any human being if operation meets one of the following conditions: ( 1 ) The operation is within or over a closed- or restricted-access site and all human beings located within the closed- or restricted-access site must be on notice that a small unmanned aircraft may fly over them; or
( 2 ) The small unmanned aircraft does not maintain sustained flight over any human being unless that human being is— ( i ) Directly participating in the operation of the small unmanned aircraft; or
( ii ) Located under a covered structure or inside a stationary vehicle that can provide reasonable protection from a falling small unmanned aircraft.
[Amdt. No. 107-8, 86 FR 4382, Jan. 15, 2021, as amended by 86 FR 62473, Nov. 10, 2021]
MEMORANDUM

DATE: November 20, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR-2013-0602

FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD

SUBJECT: June 17, 2014 Brief Remarks Regarding the Proposed Carbon Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants at the Dedication of wind turbines at Pantex Renewable 

Energy Project

SUMMARY

Brief remarks were made by EPA at the dedication of wind turbines at Pantex Renewable 

Energy Project on the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants, which was 

proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration and Siemens Government Technologies, Inc.

EPA Participant: Carl Edlund (Superfund Division Director)
EXHIBIT 23.2
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
The Board of Directors     MTI Technology Corporation:
          We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 333-85410 on FormS-3 and the registration statements (Nos. 333-109060, 333-103065, 333-85410, 333-76972, 333-69030,333-66716, 333-95915, 333-92623, 333-85579, 333-61957, 333-46363, 333-50377, 333-18501, 33-75180and 33-80438) on Form S-8 of MTI Technology Corporation of our report dated May 23, 2003,relating to the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flowsof MTI Technology Corporation and subsidiaries for the year endedApril 3, 2005,and related schedule, which report appears in the April 2, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of MTITechnology Corporation.
/S/ KPMG LLP
Costa Mesa, California
#### § 650.5 Reports of examination.

The Corporation is subject to the provisions in 12 CFR part 602 regarding FCA Reports of Examination.
###### Editorial Note on Part 747

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 747.615 Decision of the NCUA Board.

Within 15 days after service of the recommended decision, findings, conclusions, and proposed order, the applicant or counsel for NCUA may file with the NCUA Board written exceptions thereto. A supporting brief may also be filed. The NCUA Board shall render its decision within 60 days after the matter is submitted to it. The NCUA Board shall furnish copies of its decision and order to the parties. Judicial review of the NCUA Board's final decision and order may be obtained as provided in 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(2).
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trans World Entertainment Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 2, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), we, Robert J. Higgins, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John J. Sullivan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|

|/s/ Robert J. Higgins                |  | /s/
          John J. Sullivan
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  | Executive Vice President and  
|                                     |  | Chief Financial Officer       
|                                    
|September 11, 2008                   |  | September 11, 2008            









---
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22830 Filed:11/07/22 Entered:11/09/22 10:35:04 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1