alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 790.1 Scope.

This part contains a description of NCUA's organization and the procedures for public requests for action by the Board. Part 790 pertains to the practices of the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) only and does not apply to credit union operations.
Contact Us

#   Mercury

          -                  Mercury Inventory Report      
On December 21, 2023, EPA published an inventory report on the supply, use, and trade of mercury in the United States, as required by the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The report is the second in a series of triennial reports supported by the Agency’s mercury inventory reporting rule.

Learn more about the 2023 Mercury Inventory Report.
 
          -                  Mercury Reporting Amendments      
EPA published afinal rule to amend the mercury inventory reporting requirements for persons who import pre-assembled products that contain a mercury-added component. 

Learn more about the mercury inventory reporting rule.

Read the updated compliance guide for the mercury inventory reporting rule.
 
          -                  Advisories about Mercury in Fish      - Guidelines for eating fish that contain mercury
- EPA-FDA advice about eating fish and shellfish
- Find fish advisories specific to your state, territory or tribe
 
          -                  Reducing Mercury in Gold Refining Shops      
Small-scale gold refining is a major cause of air pollution from mercury. EPA helped design a low-cost mercury capture system that is simple to build and install, uses locally available materials, and reduces mercury emissions by at least 80%.
- Learn how EPA's mercury capture system is helping reduce mercury in gold shops.
 

##         Learn About Mercury          

                - Basic information
                - Health effects of mercury exposure   |  How people are exposed
                - Mercury emissions in the air
                - Resources for mercury science and research
                - Environmental laws that apply to mercury
                - Mercurio en español

##         Products that Contain Mercury          

                - Batteries
                - CFLs and other mercury-containing bulbs
                - Dental amalgam
                - Thermometers
                - Thimerosal in vaccines
                - All consumer products

##         Reducing Mercury in the Environment          

                - What EPA is doing to reduce exposures
                - International actions    |  Minamata Convention
                - Steps to reduce mercury in the environment
                - How you can minimize your exposure
                - Storing, transporting, and disposing of mercury at home

**Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry**
                        - ToxFAQs on mercury
                        - ToxFAQs on metallic mercury

**Food and Drug Administration**
                        - Advice about eating fish and shellfish

##         What to Do If You Have a Mercury Spill          

                - CFLs or other fluorescent bulbs
                - Mercury thermometers
                - Spills that are more than the amount in a thermometer
                - Read the  National Elemental Mercury Response Guidebook

**Visit the Mercury Newsroom**

Contact Us
## SERVE D FEBRUAR Y 18,201 0 DhP I O F JRANSPORWiO H U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D C onrucf o

IN TH E MATTE RO F RAYMON D H
. FESSLE R FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP10WP000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S NO
. FAA-2010-002 0
NOTIC E O FASSIGNMEN T O F PROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No
. 2009WP130025 ) ha s bee n assigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC
. Goodwin
. Al l futur e pleading s an dothe r

communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o n th e attache dServic e List
.

3nni e A
. Yod j Chie f Administrativ i Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t

### FA A Docke t No
. CP10WP0002 (Civi l Penalt

y Action) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ONE COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , DC 2059 1 Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building - Suit

e 2W1000 ' ONE COPY Eri c A
. Seitz , Respondent' s Attorne y 82 0 Mililan i Street , Suit

e 71 4 Honolulu , H

I 9681 3 TEL : 808-533-743 4 Christophe r I
. Merrill , Complainant' s Counsel Offic e of the Regiona

l Counse l Western-Pacific Region , AWP- 7 Federa l Aviation Administratio n P.O
. Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C

A 90009-2007 TEL : 310-725-710 5 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorable Richar

dC
. Goodwin , Administrative La w Judg e Offic e of Hearings , M-20 U.S
. Departmen

t of Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E , Eas t Building Groun

dFloor , Roo

mEl2-32 0 Washington , DC 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso

r 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t 202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e Sfi^ b y U.S
. Mail , Fo r servic e i n perso n o r

b y expedite dcourier , us e th e follovying address : Hearin g Docket , Federa l Aviatio n Administration , 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wright Buildin g - Roo m 2014 , Washington , Q C 20591 , Attention ; Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
<PAGE>



                           EXHIBIT 11 TO FORM 10-KSB/A

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE AND COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                    Year Ended December 31,
                                                                              ------------------------------------
                                                                                   1999                1998
                                                                              ----------------    ----------------

<S>                                                                           <C>                 <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
Weighted average common shares outstanding................................         16,612,314           9,882,227
                                                                              ================    ================
    Basic loss per share..................................................       $      (0.62)       $      (2.97)
                                                                              ================    ================

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Weighted average common shares outstanding................................         16,612,314           9,882,227
Shares issuable from assumed conversion of
       convertible preferred stock........................................             96,830                 ---
Shares issuable from assumed conversion of
    common share options and warrants.....................................             10,437              40,123
                                                                              ----------------    ----------------
Weighted average common shares outstanding, as adjusted...................         16,719,581           9,922,350
                                                                              ================    ================
    Diluted loss per share................................................       $      (0.61)       $      (2.96)
                                                                              ================    ================

EARNINGS FOR BASIC AND DILUTED COMPUTATION
Net income................................................................       $(10,250,238)       $(29,321,347)
Preferred shares dividend.................................................                ---             (48,138)
                                                                              ----------------    ----------------
Net income to common shareholders (basic and diluted
    earnings per share computation).......................................       $(10,250,238)       $(29,369,485)
                                                                              ================    ================
</TABLE>


This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K; although it is
contrary to paragraphs 13 through 16 of the Financial Accounting Standards
Board's Statement of Financial Standard No. 128, because it produces an
antidilutive result.


                                       63
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50583 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE LUIS BANDA-VASQUEZ, also known as Jose Banda, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-01-CR-649-ALL

-------------------- March 14, 2003 Before REAVLEY, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Luis Banda-Vasquez (Banda) appeals the sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for being found in the United States after a prior deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). He argues that his prior conviction for transporting aliens within the United States is not an alien smuggling offense under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2. This argument isNo. 02-50583 -2- foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Solis-Campozano , 312 F.3d 164, 167 (5th Cir. 2002). Next, Banda argues that the district court erred in going beyond the statute of conviction and the charging instrument to determine that a 16-level increase in his offense level was warranted under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(vii). He contends that the district court must employ a categorical approach to determine whether his prior alien transporting offense was committed for profit. Banda did not make this argument below, and concedes that our review is for plain error. Assuming without deciding that the district court and the probation officer were obliged under our precedents to take a categorical approach, and plainly erred in doing otherwise, we decline to correct such an error because it did not seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. See United States v. McDowell , 109 F.3d 214, 216 (5th Cir. 1997). Banda does not dispute that his prior offense was in fact committed for profit. His only complaint is that the probation officer and district court went the extra mile in determining the true nature of his prior offense. In our view, this effort does not merit correction under the plain error standard. Banda also contends that his sentence is unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), because his prior felony conviction was not alleged in his indictment. BandaNo. 02-50583 -3- acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve the issue for further review. The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: 

APPOINTMENT TO THE PENNSYLVANIA 

INTEREST ON LAWYERS TRUST 

ACCOUNT BOARD

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 226

DISCIPLINARY RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8

th day of July, 2022, Sharon R. Lopez, Esquire, Lancaster

County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Pennsylvania Interest on Lawyers Trust 

Account Board for a term of three years, commencing September 1, 2022.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Grants toencourage arrest policies and enforcement of protection orders program[electronic resource].
 
SuDocNumber:J35.22:
ItemNumber:0719-A-04(online)
CGPSystem Number:000602398
 
2004
2006
2007
2009
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015**
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10195]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Economic Injury Disaster #9H11]


State of Hawaii

    The City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii constitutes an economic 
injury disaster loan area as a result of a rockslide that occurred on 
March 6, 2000 and closed the Kamehameha Highway. Eligible small 
businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available 
elsewhere may file applications for economic injury assistance as a 
result of this disaster until the close of business on January 17, 
2001, at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: 
U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 4 Office, P.O. Box 
13795, Sacramento, CA 95853-4795.
    The interest rate for eligible small businesses and small 
agricultural cooperatives is 4 percent. The economic injury number for 
this disaster is 9H1100.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59002.)

    Dated: April 17, 2000.
Aida Alvarez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-10195 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
§ 615.5250 Disclosure requirements for sales of borrower stock. ( a ) For sales of borrower stock, which for this subpart means equities purchased as a condition for obtaining a loan, a System institution must provide a prospective borrower with the following documents prior to loan closing: ( 1 ) The institution's most recent annual report filed under part 620 of this chapter;
( 2 ) The institution's most recent quarterly report filed under part 620 of this chapter, if more recent than the annual report;
( 3 ) A copy of the institution's capitalization bylaws; and
( 4 ) A written description of the terms and conditions under which the equity is issued. In addition to specific terms and conditions, the description must disclose: ( i ) That the equity is an at-risk investment and not a compensating balance;
( ii ) That the equity is retireable only at the discretion of the board of directors consistent with the institution's bylaws and only if minimum capital standards established under subpart H of this part and part 628 of this chapter are met and that such retirement may also require the approval of the FCA;
( iii ) Whether the institution presently meets its minimum capital standards established under subpart H of this part and part 628 of this chapter;
( iv ) Whether the institution knows of any reason the institution may not meet its capital standards on the next earnings distribution date; and
( v ) The rights, if any, to share in patronage payments.
( b ) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, no materials previously provided to a purchaser (except the disclosures required by paragraph (a)(4) of this section) need be provided again unless the purchaser requests such materials.
[81 FR 49776, July 28, 2016]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         I, Eric Bello, Treasurer (principal financial officer) of Quipp, Inc.,
a Florida corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my
knowledge:

         (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                      * * *



/s/ Eric Bello
--------------
Eric Bello
Treasurer (principal financial officer)

Date: August 12, 2003
JEROLD JONES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2090

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 6, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Walton County.

Kelvin C. Wells, Judge.

Bruce A. Miller, Public Defender, and Thomas S. Murphy, Assistant Public 

Defender, DeFuniak Springs, for Appellant; Jerold Jones, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
#### § 708a.311 Voting incentives.

If a merging credit union offers an incentive to encourage members to participate in the vote, including a prize raffle, every reference to such incentive made by the credit union in a written communication to its members must also state that members are eligible for the incentive regardless of whether they vote for or against the proposed merger.
#### SMITH *v.*THE STATE.

No. 9171.

August 11, 1932.

*Branch & Howard*and *Thomas Branch Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Lawrence S. Camp, attorney-general, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, T. R. Gress, assistant attorney-general, J. W. LeGraw,*and *John H. Hudson,*contra.

Gilbert, J.

Frank Smith was convicted of the crime of murder. His motion for a new trial was overruled, and he excepted.

Movant complains that the court charged the jury as follows : ' "It is contended by the State, and denied by the defendant, that this defendant, Frank Smith, made certain statements or admissions that illustrate his guilt or innocence. You would first determine whether or not he made such statements. If you find that he did make them, you would be authorized to consider them in connection with all other evidence in the case and the defendant’s statement, in determining his guilt or innocence, provided you find they were freely and voluntarily made. I instruct you, however, that all statements, if made, should be scanned with care and received with great caution. An admission alone would not be sufficient upon which to convict. An admission, if made, would have to be corroborated by other facts or circumstances that tend to connect the defendant with the crime as charged.” The criticism is that the court included in said charge these words; "An admis*362sion, if made, would have to be corroborated by other facts or circumstances that tend to connect the defendant with the crime as charged.” It is contended that, unlike a confession, an admission is “merely a waiver of proof of one fact or several facts,” and not of all proof. *Held,*that the excerpt must be considered with the entire charge. So considered, it is not erroneous.

The court did not err in failing to charge on the subject of voluntary manslaughter, either as based upon Penal Code § 64, or upon the theory of mutual combat. The State made a case of deliberate murder from ambush. The defendant made a case of precisely the same character, but reversed; that is, that the deceased and others attempted to assassinate the accused, but that the latter in self-defense shot the deceased. Accordingly, voluntary manslaughter was not involved under either theory claimed. There was no “mutual combat.”

The verdict is supported by evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3399

To suspend temporarily the duty on electron guns for certain cathode ray 

tubes, liquid crystal display panel assemblies for use in liquid crystal 

display projection type televisions, and plasma display panel assemblies 

for use in plasma flat panel screen televisions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2003

Mr. MURTHA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on electron guns for certain 

cathode ray tubes, liquid crystal display panel assemblies 

for use in liquid crystal display projection type televisions, and plasma display panel assemblies for use in 

plasma flat panel screen televisions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSIONS OF DUTY. 

4 (a) ELECTRON GUNS FOR CERTAIN CRT’S.—Sub5 chapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Sched6 ule of the United States is amended by inserting in numer7 ical sequence the following new heading:
2

•HR 3399 IH 

‘‘ 9902.05.01 Electron guns actually used for 

cathode ray tubes 

(‘‘CRT’s’’) with a 

high definition 

television screen 

aspect ratio of 

16:9 (provided 

for in subheading 

8540.91.50) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 

1 (b) LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY PANEL ASSEMBLIES

2 FOR LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY PROJECTION TYPE TELE3 VISIONS.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 

4 Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by insert5 ing in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.05.02 Liquid crystal 

display panel assemblies for use 

in liquid crystal 

display projection 

type televisions 

(provided for in 

subheading 

9013.80.90) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 

6 (c) CERTAIN PLASMA DISPLAY PANEL ASSEM7 BLIES.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 

8 Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by insert9 ing in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.05.03 Plasma display 

panel assemblies 

for use in plasma 

flat panel screen 

televisions (provided for in subheading 

8529.90.53) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 

10 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

11 The amendments made by this Act apply with respect 

12 to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for con-
3

•HR 3399 IH 

1 sumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the 

2 enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 796.3 What special post-employment restrictions apply to senior examiners? ( a ) *Senior examiners of federally insured credit unions.* An officer or employee of the NCUA who performs work (onsite or offsite) as the senior examiner of a federally insured credit union for a total of two or more months during the last 12 months of individual's employment with NCUA may not, within one year after leaving NCUA employment, knowingly accept compensation as an employee, officer, director, or consultant from that credit union.
( b ) *Example.* An NCUA resident corporate credit union examiner assigned to work at a federally insured, corporate credit union for two or more months during the last 12 months of that individual's employment with NCUA will be subject to the one-year prohibition of this section.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MILTON ALLEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3320

[January 16, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 09-2048 CF10A.

Milton Allen, Bushnell, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.