alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3501

To grant an extension of authority for the establishment of the Thomas 

Paine Memorial, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2003

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To grant an extension of authority for the establishment 

of the Thomas Paine Memorial, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR ESTABLISH4 MENT OF THOMAS PAINE MEMORIAL. 

5 Section 4 of Public Law 102–407 (40 U.S.C. 8903 

6 note), as added by section 142 of the Department of the 

7 Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000 

8 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–113; 113 Stat. 
2

•HR 3501 IH 

1 1501A–171), is amended by striking ‘‘2003’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘2006’’.

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 5, 2018

No. 04-18-00748-CR

Ashley Nicole Olivia LOPEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR2149

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On October 15, 2018, appellant Ashley Nicole Olivia Lopez filed a notice of appeal from 

a trial court’s order placing her on deferred adjudication community supervision. The notice of 

appeal was filed under trial court cause number 2018CR2149, and this court assigned the appeal

two appellate numbers: 04-18-00748-CR and 04-18-00754-CR. Thus, there are two appeals 

currently pending from the same order. 

At this time, only the following documents have been filed in appellate number 04-18-

00748-CR: (1) the pro se notice of appeal; (2) a pro se motion for appointment of counsel on 

appeal; (3) the trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal; and (4) the certificate of 

notice of appeal. The clerk’s record as well as a supplemental clerk’s record, which includes the 

above documents, have been filed in appellate number 04-18-00754-CR. 

Accordingly, after review, we ORDER the clerk of this court to administratively close 

appellate number 04-18-00748-CR. We ORDER the clerk of this court to transfer all filings in 

appellate number 04-18-00748-CR to appellate number 04-18-00754-CR. All future filings in 

this matter should be filed under 04-18-00754-CR. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel, the district 

clerk, and the court reporter, if any. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of December, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 27, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-31103 Summary Calendar

RAYMOND GIUFFRIA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BELLSOUTH TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:03-CV-3235

-------------------- Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Raymond Giuffria appeals following the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendant in this civil action. Giuffria alleged in his complaint that Bellsouth committed fraud by billing him for America Online (“AOL”) services to which he did not subscribe. “This court reviews a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same legal standards as the district court.” Am. Home Assurance Co. v. United SpaceNo. 04-31103 -2- Alliance, LLC , 378 F.3d 482, 486 (5th Cir. 2004). Giuffria argues that the bills Bellsouth sent to him were fraudulent. However, he fails to show a genuine issue of material fact with respect to the elements for a cause of action for fraud, and his largely conclusional brief is insufficient to meet his summary judgment burden. See Little v. Liquid Air Corp. , 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc); see also Guidry v. United States Tobacco Co., Inc. , 188 F.3d 619, 627 (5th Cir. 1999). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000049908-JUN-201208:46 AM
EXHIBIT 32.2
------------

   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
   1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") of ANTs software
inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the period ended March 31,
2009:

     1. Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not
to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be "filed" for any
purpose whatsoever.

Date: May 19, 2009

                             /s/ Joseph Kozak
                             ----------------
                             Joseph Kozak, Chief Executive Officer and President

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be
retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23232-3 Filed:01/09/23 Entered:01/10/23 17:03:00 Desc:

Envelope Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT A

Schedule of Claims Subject to the Five Hundred Forty-Ninth Omnibus Objection 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23751-1 Filed:03/08/23 Entered:03/08/23 15:04:53 Desc:

Exhibit A - Schedule of Claims Subject to the Five Hundred Forty-Ninth Omnibus Page 1 of 2
Five Hundred Forty-Ninth Omnibus Objection

Exhibit A - Claims to Be Disallowed

NAME DATE FILED DEBTOR CLAIM #

ASSERTED CLAIM 

CASE NUMBER AMOUNT

 1 PRADO RODRIGUEZ, BIENVENIDA 02/03/2020 17 BK 03283-LTS Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 173104-1

HC-01 BOX 4156

NAGUABO, PR 00718

Undetermined*

Reason: Claim purports to assert liabilities associated with the litigation captioned Nilda Agosto Maldonado et al. v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Family Department et al., Civil No. 

KPE-2005-0608 (the “Litigation”). However, based on documentation submitted by the attorney representing all claimants in the Litigation, Claimant is not a named plaintiff in that 

Litigation, and there is therefore no basis for claimant to assert liabilities associated with that Litigation against the Commonwealth, ERS, or any other Title III debtor. Further, even if 

Claimant were in fact a plaintiff in that litigation, the claim would be duplicative of Claim no. 115276, the master proof of claim filed on behalf of all plaintiffs associated with the 

litigation captioned Agosto Maldonado. A portion of this claim has been transferred into the Administrative Claims Reconciliation (ACR) process and will be resolved consistent with 

the ACR procedures. Because this objection does not constitute an objection to the portion of the claim in the ACR process, the Debtors’ reserve their rights to object to the remaining 

portion of the claim on any other grounds whatsoever.

Claim #173104-1 also contained on Exhibit A to the 548th Omnibus Claims Objection for Claims to Be Disallowed.

 2 RODRIGUEZ FARIA, MARILYN 05/18/2018 17 BK 03283-LTS Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 14149

URB PASEO SOL Y MAR CALLE CORAL 640

JUANA DIAZ, PR 00795

Undetermined*

Reason: Claim purports to assert liabilities associated with the litigation captioned Nilda Agosto Maldonado et al. v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Family Department et al., Civil No. 

KPE-2005-0608 (the “Litigation”). However, based on documentation submitted by the attorney representing all claimants in the Litigation, Claimant is not a named plaintiff in that 

Litigation, and there is therefore no basis for claimant to assert liabilities associated with that Litigation against the Commonwealth, ERS, or any other Title III debtor. Further, even if 

Claimant were in fact a plaintiff in that litigation, the claim would be duplicative of Claim no. 115276, the master proof of claim filed on behalf of all plaintiffs associated with the 

litigation captioned Agosto Maldonado.

Claim #14149 also contained on Exhibit A to the 548th Omnibus Claims Objection for Claims to Be Disallowed.

TOTAL Undetermined*

*Indicates claim contains unliquidated and/or undetermined amounts 1

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23751-1 Filed:03/08/23 Entered:03/08/23 15:04:53 Desc:

Exhibit A - Schedule of Claims Subject to the Five Hundred Forty-Ninth Omnibus Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3313 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3313

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit Federal court 
     jurisdiction over questions under the Defense of Marriage Act.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3313

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit Federal court 
     jurisdiction over questions under the Defense of Marriage Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Marriage Protection Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON JURISDICTION.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 99 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1632. Limitation on jurisdiction
    ``No court created by Act of Congress shall have any jurisdiction, 
and the Supreme Court shall have no appellate jurisdiction, to hear or 
decide any question pertaining to the interpretation of, or the 
validity under the Constitution of, section 1738C or this section.''.
    (b) Amendments to the Table of Sections.--The table of sections at 
the beginning of chapter 99 of title 28, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following new item:

``1632. Limitation on jurisdiction.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CHARLES NEIMAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.

Submitted February 16, 1940 —

Decided May 2, 1940.

For the defendant in error, *William A. Wachenfeld.*

For the plaintiff in error, *J. Victor D’Aloia.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— -The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Bodine, Hehee, Peeskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 12.

*For reversal*— Hone.
#### Ginsburg v. Kovrak

(For opinion in this case, see page 615, supra.)

*Decree Nisi*

And now, this January 14, 1957, upon consideration of the foregoing case,, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed as follows:

1. Defendant, Stephen J. Kovrak, is hereby permanently enjoined, in the County of Philadelphia, from practicing law; from holding himself out to the public as being entitled to practice law; from using or advertising the title of lawyer, attorney-at-law, attorney and counsellor-at-law, counsellor, or the equivalent in any language, in such manner as to convey the impression that he is a practitioner of the law of this or any other State, nation, country or land; or in any manner from advertising that he, alone or together with other persons, has, owns, conducts or maintains a law office, or a law and collection office of any kind for the practice of the law of this 'or any other State, nation, country or land; without having hereafter been duly and regularly admitted to practice law in a court of record of the County of Philadelphia in accordance with the regularly established rules governing such admissions.

2. Defendant shall pay the costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

*Board Action:*                     Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules of Procedure, as amended in April, 2004, notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has issued Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standard 35, Estimating the Historical Cost of General Property, Plant, and Equipment—Amending Statements of Federal Financial Accounting Standards 6 and 23.                

                    The standard is available on the FASAB home page                     *http://www.fasab.gov/​standards.html*. Copies                           ( print page 53500)                        can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wendy Payne, Executive Director, at (202) 512-7350.

Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463.

Dated: October 14, 2009.

Charles Jackson,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-25104 Filed 10-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10364]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION BOARD MEETING


Sunshine Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: May 23, 2000, 11:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m.

PLACE: 901 N. Stuart Street, Tenth Floor, Arlington, Virginia 22203.

STATUS: Open session except for the portion specified as closed session 
as provided in 22 CFR Part 1004.4 (f).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Approval of the Minutes of the January 31, 
2000, Meeting of the Board of Directors
Discussion of Fiscal Year 1999 Grant Results Report
Discussion of Fiscal Year 2000 Programs and Operations
Report on Congressional Activities
Closed Session To Discuss Personnel Issues. Closed session as provided 
in 22 CFR Part 1004.4 (f).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Adolfo A. Franco, Secretary to the 
Board of Directors, (703) 306-4325.

    Dated: April 12, 2000.
Adolfo A. Franco,
Sunshine Act Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-10364 Filed 4-21-00; 12:52 pm]
BILLING CODE 7025-01-U
§ 339.7 Force placement of flood insurance. ( a ) *Notice and purchase of coverage.* If an FDIC-supervised institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, determines at any time during the term of a designated loan, that the building or mobile home and any personal property securing the designated loan is not covered by flood insurance or is covered by flood insurance in an amount less than the amount required under § 339.3, then the FDIC-supervised institution or its servicer shall notify the borrower that the borrower should obtain flood insurance, at the borrower's expense, in an amount at least equal to the amount required under § 339.3, for the remaining term of the loan. If the borrower fails to obtain flood insurance within 45 days after notification, then the FDIC-supervised institution or its servicer shall purchase insurance on the borrower's behalf. The FDIC-supervised institution or its servicer may charge the borrower for the cost of premiums and fees incurred in purchasing the insurance, including premiums or fees incurred for coverage beginning on the date on which flood insurance coverage lapsed or did not provide a sufficient coverage amount.
( b ) *Termination of force-placed insurance* — ( 1 ) *Termination and refund.* Within 30 days of receipt by an FDIC-supervised institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, of a confirmation of a borrower's existing flood insurance coverage, the FDIC-supervised institution or its servicer shall: ( i ) Notify the insurance provider to terminate any insurance purchased by the FDIC-supervised institution or its servicer under paragraph (a) of this section; and
( ii ) Refund to the borrower all premiums paid by the borrower for any insurance purchased by the FDIC-supervised institution or its servicer under paragraph (a) of this section during any period during which the borrower's flood insurance coverage and the insurance coverage purchased by the FDIC-supervised institution or its servicer were each in effect, and any related fees charged to the borrower with respect to the insurance purchased by the FDIC-supervised institution or its servicer during such period.
( 2 ) *Sufficiency of demonstration.* For purposes of confirming a borrower's existing flood insurance coverage under paragraph (b) of this section, an FDIC-supervised institution or its servicer shall accept from the borrower an insurance policy declarations page that includes the existing flood insurance policy number and the identity of, and contact information for, the insurance company or agent.
#### Tomas Alvarinia and Jacinto Alfonso, Doing Business Under the Firm Name of Alvarinia & Alfonso, *Plaintiffs in Error,*v. Louis Rouch, Doing Business Under the Firm Name of L. Rouch & Co., *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion Filed January 10, 1923.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Marion County; H. Pierre Branning, Judge.

*41*Wm. H. Malone,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*W. Hunt Harris,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

In an action of assumpsit on the common counts, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for the price of several car loads of eggs. The defendants took writ of error.

The evidence does not clearly show a sale to the defendants of all the cars of eggs under such conditions as warrant a recovery of the entire amount claimed on the issues made. See Blue Lake Celery Co. v. Peyton-Lofberg Live Stock Co., decided last term.

The evidence tends to show separate transactions for different cars of eggs rather than a running account between the parties involving continuous shipments of cars of eggs. Irrelevant portions of the replication should be eliminated.

As liability of the defendants under the declaration for definite amounts is not clearly shown, this is not a proper case for suggesting a remittitur..

Reversed for a new trial.

All concur.
EX-4.7 - 1997 STOCK PURCHASE PLAN - AMEND. #4





Exhibit 4.7


FOURTH AMENDMENT

to the

RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION

1997 STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


      I, Rodney L. Waller, hereby certify that I am the Secretary of Range
Resources Corporation, (the “Company”) and that, as such, I am authorized to
execute this amendment on behalf of the Company, and, DO HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY
THAT the following resolution was duly approved and adopted by the Shareholders
of the Company on May 24, 2001 at the Company’s Annual Meeting of the
Shareholders:


      RESOLVED, that the Range Resources Corporation 1997 Stock Purchase Plan,
be amended by deleting Article IV thereof and substituting the following
therefore:



	 	 	“There shall be 1,750,000 shares of Common Stock reserved under
the Plan, subject to adjustment in accordance with Article XII
hereof. The shares of Common Stock subject to the Plan shall be
either shares of authorized but unissued Common Stock or shares of
Common Stock reacquired on the open market or otherwise for the
account of the Participants. The Committee shall determine from
time to time whether the shares of Common Stock shall be
authorized or unissued shares or reacquired shares.”



May 24, 2001



	 	 
		/s/  Rodney L. Waller



Rodney L. Waller

Corporate Secretary



18
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.6


                              [BALDWIN LETTERHEAD]

                              BALDWIN NEWS RELEASE

CONTACTS: Perry Schwartz                                Wes Truesdell
          Baldwin Piano                                 The Dilenschneider Group
          (513) 576-4518                                (212) 922-0900

                        BALDWIN DIRECTORS WIN RE-ELECTION
                             BY OVERWHELMING MARGIN

              FINAL VOTE TALLY REVEALS MAGNITUDE OF BOLERO'S DEFEAT

     LOVELAND, OH, June 19, 1997 -- Baldwin Piano and Organ Company
(NASDAQ:BPAO) said today that it has received the final Inspectors of Election
Report from CT Corporation System on the results of last week's shareholder
vote. The report confirmed preliminary indications that the company's five
directors had been re-elected by an overwhelming margin, receiving approximately
74 percent of the 3.2 million shares represented at Baldwin's June 12
shareholder meeting. Approximately 490,000 shares, or 15 percent of the shares
represented at the meeting, did not vote for directors.

     Discounting the approximately 279,000 shares beneficially owned or
controlled by challenger Bolero Investments Group, L.P. and its sole general
partner, Kenneth W. Pavia, Sr., Bolero's director slate only garnered votes from
approximately 62,000 shares that it did not already control.

     "We view this overwhelming margin of victory as a clear mandate to continue
executing our strategic growth plan for Baldwin," said Karen L. Hendricks,
Baldwin chairman and CEO.

     Re-elected to the Baldwin board along with Ms. Hendricks were George E.
Castrucci, William B. Connell, Joseph H. Head, Jr., and Roger L. Howe.


                                     -more-


<PAGE>   2
                                     -2-

     In her remarks to shareholders last week, Ms. Hendricks spoke
enthusiastically of the various programs Baldwin has initiated to improve
manufacturing efficiency and asset utilization, and ultimately the company's
financial performance. She also cited positive dealer and marketplace reaction
to two new products -- Baldwin's digital Pianovelle and its proprietary acoustic
piano autoplayer, the Baldwin ConcertMaster -- as among her key reasons for
renewed optimism.

     Baldwin Piano and Organ Company has manufactured and marketed keyboard
musical products for 135 years and has been providing consumer financing for its
investments for nearly a century. The market leader in acoustic pianos in the
United States, Baldwin also manufactures electronic and electro-mechanical
components for Original Equipment Manufacturers.

                                      # # #