alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SARINGH HEYBECYAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-70127

Agency No. A088-102-629

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 10, 2015** 

Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD and BERZON, Circuit Judges, and ZOUHARY,*** District Judge.

 

FILED

DEC 23 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Jack Zouhary, District Judge for the U.S. District

Court for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
Saringh1

 Heybecyan seeks review of the BIA’s denial of her motion to

reopen immigration proceedings.

The BIA’s decision is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Sembiring v.

Gonzales, 499 F.3d 981, 985 (9th Cir. 2007). “The BIA abuses its discretion when

it acts arbitrarily, irrationally or contrary to the law.” Id. (internal alterations

omitted) (quoting Movsisian v. Gonzales, 395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir. 2007)).

Heybecyan maintains the BIA abused its discretion by denying her motion to

reopen because she did not receive notice of the hearing in which an immigration

judge ordered her removed. She contends the immigration court did not send

notice to the proper address.

We disagree. The immigration court sent the notice of hearing to the

“mailing” address Heybecyan provided. Notice sent to an alien’s “most recent

address” is “sufficient” under the Immigration and Nationality Act, see 8 U.S.C. §

1229a(b)(5)(A); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.2(c)(3)(ii), and also satisfies due process, see

Popa v. Holder, 571 F.3d 890, 897–98 (9th Cir. 2009). Heybecyan has not

challenged the presumption of effective delivery. See Salta v. INS, 314 F.3d 1076

(9th Cir. 2002). 

1

In many of the record documents, Heybecyan’s first name is spelled

“Sarineh.” Because, however, this appeal is titled Saringh Heybecyan v. Lynch, we

use the latter spelling.

2
Although Heybecyan may not have actually received notice, in these

circumstances she is charged with having constructively done so. See Popa, 571

F.3d at 897–98; In re G-Y-R-, 23 I. & N. Dec. 181, 189 (BIA 2001). She was

advised of her responsibility to keep the immigration court apprised of her address. 

See 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a)(1)(F), (c). She has not challenged as ineffective the

assistance of Shirak Khojayan, the non-attorney representative who appears to

have provided the immigration court with Heybecyan’s mailing address. Nor does

she dispute that she did not file a change of address form or otherwise notify the

immigration court that the mailing address Khojayan provided on her behalf was

incorrect. Accordingly, we conclude that the BIA’s decision to deny Heybecyan’s

motion to reopen was not arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law.

PETITION DENIED.

3
Exhibit  32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of APA Optics, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anil K. Jain, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

August 12, 2004


Signature: /s/ Anil K. Jain
           ----------------
Print Name: Anil K. Jain
            ------------
Print Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
             ---------------------------------------------------


                                       21
<PAGE>
#### CLARK *v.*BOND.

Minor executing a mortgage and judgment against — no relief in chancery — limitations— sleeping upon one’s rights.

Where a minor has executed a mortgage, and judgment has gone against him upon sci. fa. and two nihils, his remedy is by writ of error, and if he has slept upon his legal rights until they are barred by the statute of limitations, chancery will not afford him redress.

Chancery. The bill makes the following case: that the complainant purchased of the defendant a lot of ground, and executed his mortgage to secure the purchase money. Payment not having been made, a scire facias was sued out upon the .mortgage, two nihils were returned, judgment entered, and the mortgaged premises sold by the sheriff.for less than the sum due. Then a scire facias was sued out to have a general judgment and execution for the balance due. Two nihils were returned here also, and a *judgment taken*for the balance, without appearance by the defendant, which remains unsatisfied. The complainant prays to have the judgment enjoined, because, as he alleges, he was a *minor*at the time of the mortgage and the scire facias, and although he lived in the county, he had no notice of the suits.

The answer denies all fraud or knowledge of the complainant’s minority or place of residence.

Collett, C. J.

The bill must be dismissed. If the complainant has any remedy, it is strictly a legal remedy. If it be true, that the proceedings in the court below took place while the defendant *283was a minor; or if, during his minority, he executed the mortgage' on which they were founded, his remedy should have been sought through a writ of error, not by bill in equity. But he has slept upon his rights ten years, until barred by the act of limitation, and now seeks the aid of this Court; because he has foregone his legal remedy. If this proceeding were to obtain countenance in this Court, every case at law, where the party had slept until he has forfeited his right to proceed at law, would be drawn here for review and the correction of errors.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1996 and the consolidated
statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                        10,900  
<SECURITIES>                                  34,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                    698
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              46,486
<PP&E>                                         3,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                   476     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                50,148       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,444
<BONDS>                                            0   
<COMMON>                                         137  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0  
<OTHER-SE>                                    48,547       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  50,148
<SALES>                                            0           
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  9,623           
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (7,819)        
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (7,819)       
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (7,819)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (0.63) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.63)
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****EPA�s planned complianceassistance activities for fiscal year**
 
SuDoc Number:EP 1.2:C 73/33/

Item Number:0431-I-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001116679
 
2003 | 2004 | 2005| 2006
 
March 10, 2020
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3379

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3210 East 10th Street in Bloomington, Indiana, as the ‘‘Francis X. 

McCloskey Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 28, 2003

Mr. HILL (for himself, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. VISCLOSKY, Mr. PENCE, Mr. CHOCOLA, Mr. 

SOUDER, and Mr. BUYER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3210 East 10th Street in Bloomington, Indiana, as the ‘‘Francis X. McCloskey Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FRANCIS X. MCCLOSKEY POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 3210 East 10th Street in Bloom-
2

•HR 3379 IH 

1 ington, Indiana, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Francis X. McCloskey Post Office Building’’ . 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the Francis X. McCloskey 

7 Post Office Building.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrant's 2nd quarter 1997 Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         858,169
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,433,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                    64,468
<INVENTORY>                                    402,143
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,103,898
<PP&E>                                      23,679,808
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,926,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,086,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,635,484
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,587
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,651,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,086,862
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,323,230
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,153,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             692,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                736,127
<INCOME-TAX>                                   268,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            467,877
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   405,262<F2>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
<FN>
<F1>Other expenses are netted with other income in the period. The result was
income of $259,384.  The edgarlink program does no allow a income number to be
entered in this field.  The other expense portion of this number is immaterial.
<F2>The difference between Income Continuing and Net Income relates to Minority
Interests in Preferred Stock Dividends of consolidated subsidiaries
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 652.15 Non-program investment purposes and limitation. ( a ) Farmer Mac is authorized to hold eligible non-program investments listed under § 652.20 for the purposes of enterprise risk management, including complying with its interest rate risk requirements in § 652.30; complying with its liquidity requirements in § 652.40; managing surplus short-term funds; and complementing program business activities.
( b ) Non-program investments cannot exceed 35 percent of program assets and program obligations, excluding 75 percent of the program assets that are guaranteed by the United States Department of Agriculture as described in section 8.0(9)(B) of the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended. When calculating the total amount of non-program investments under this section, exclude investments pledged to meet margin requirements on derivative transactions.
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3537

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 185 State Street in Manhattan, Illinois, as 

the ‘‘Army Pvt. Shawn Pahnke Manhattan Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3537 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 185 State Street in Manhattan, Illinois, shall be 

4 known and designated as the ‘‘Army Pvt. Shawn Pahnke 

5 Manhattan Post Office’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Army Pvt. Shawn Pahnke Manhattan Post Of11 fice’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 9, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22994-2 Filed:12/05/22 Entered:12/06/2

Envelope Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53741-53742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25047]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Notice of Open Special Meeting of the Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory 
Committee (SAAC) of the Export-Import Bank of the United States 
(Export-Import Bank)

SUMMARY: The Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee was established by 
Public Law 105-121, November 26, 1997, to advise the Board of Directors 
on the development and implementation of policies and programs designed 
to support the expansion of the Bank's financial commitments in Sub-
Saharan Africa under the loan, guarantee, and insurance programs of the 
Bank. Further, the committee shall make recommendations on how the Bank 
can facilitate greater support by U.S. commercial banks for trade with 
Sub-Saharan Africa.
    Time and Place: November 4, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. The 
meeting will be held at the Export-Import Bank in Room 1143, 811 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.
    Agenda: Presentation on recent developments in Sub-Saharan Africa 
markets by Export-Import Bank staff; discussion and update on the 2008 
committee recommendations to U.S. Congress followed by an update on a 
new Sub-Saharan Africa special initiative; and an update on the Bank's 
on-going business development initiatives.
    Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public 
participation, and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral 
questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written 
statement(s) before or after the meeting. If any person wishes 
auxiliary aids (such as a sign language interpreter) or other special 
accommodations, please contact, prior to November 4, 2009, Barbara 
Ransom, Room 1209, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, 
Voice: (202) 565-3525 or TDD (202) 565-3377.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact 
Barbara Ransom, Room 1209, 811 Vermont

[[Page 53742]]

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3525.

Jonathan Cordone,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-25047 Filed 10-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
GEOGCS["GCS_WGS_1984",DATUM["D_WGS_1984",SPHEROID["WGS_1984",6378137.0,298.257223563]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0],UNIT["Degree",0.0174532925199433]]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-10615 Summary Calendar

J. M. MITCHELL; THOMAS C. MOORE, Plaintiffs - Counter Defendants - Appellees,

VERSUS
THE CADLE COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation, Defendant - Counter Claimant - Cross Claimant - Appellant,

COMBINED FINANCIAL CORPORATION,

Defendant - Cross Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas

(2:94-CV-353) December 6, 1996
Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Defendant-Appellant Cadle Company appeals a judgment againstit in this case brought under the federal and Texas fair debt

collection statutes. 15 U.S.C. § 1692a e t seq ; T EX . R EV . C IV . S TAT . A NN . art. 5069-11.01 et seq . The jury found in favor of plaintiffs J. M. Mitchell and Thomas C. Moore, awarding the pair $5,000 each in actual damages, $20,000 in punitive damages and attorneys’ fees. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties, the record excerpts and relevant portions of the record, we are persuaded that the distric t court committed no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED
.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23624-2 Filed:02/24/23 Entered:02/24/23 16:47:01 Desc:

Appendix Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration Page 1 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23624-2 Filed:02/24/23 Entered:02/24/23 16:47:01 Desc:

Appendix Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration Page 2 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23624-2 Filed:02/24/23 Entered:02/24/23 16:47:01 Desc:

Appendix Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration Page 3 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23624-2 Filed:02/24/23 Entered:02/24/23 16:47:01 Desc:

Appendix Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration Page 4 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23624-2 Filed:02/24/23 Entered:02/24/23 16:47:01 Desc:

Appendix Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration Page 5 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23624-2 Filed:02/24/23 Entered:02/24/23 16:47:01 Desc:

Appendix Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration Page 6 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23624-2 Filed:02/24/23 Entered:02/24/23 16:47:01 Desc:

Appendix Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration Page 7 of 8
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23624-2 Filed:02/24/23 Entered:02/24/23 16:47:01 Desc:

Appendix Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration Page 8 of 8
Supreme Court of Florida

THURSDAY, MARCH 4, 2021

CASE NO.: SC19-953

Lower Tribunal No(s).:

122018CF000667CFAXMX

ROBERT CRAFT vs. STATE OF FLORIDA

Appellant(s) Appellee(s)

Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied. 

CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, MUÑIZ, COURIEL, 

and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

LABARGA, J., concurs with an opinion.

LABARGA, J., concurring.

I agree that Craft has not established a basis for rehearing, and consequently, 

I have voted to deny rehearing. However, I firmly adhere to my dissent in 

Lawrence v. State, 308 So. 3d 544 (Fla. 2020), and my belief that proportionality 

review is an essential part of this Court’s review of death penalty cases on direct 

appeal.

A True Copy

Test:
CASE NO.: SC19-953

Page Two

so

Served:

RICHARD M. BRACEY III

HON. JESSICA JOAN YEARY, PUBLIC DEFENDER

WILLIAM D. CHAPPELL

HON. P. DEWITT CASON, CLERK

HON. PAUL SPURGIN BRYAN, JUDGE

HON. MARK EDWARD FEAGLE, CHIEF JUDGE
§ 615.5356 Notice of intent to issue a capital directive. The Farm Credit Administration will notify an institution in writing of its intention to issue a capital directive. The notice will state: ( a ) The reasons for issuance of the capital directive;
( b ) The proposed contents of the capital directive, including the proposed date for achieving the minimum capital requirement; and
( c ) Any other relevant information concerning the decision to issue a capital directive.
### Reconnaissance of ground-water resources of northeastern Valley County, Montana

By: L.K. Tuck

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/sim2821

#### Links

- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to my knowledge, the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), for the quarter ended June 30, 2005:

         1. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    August 8, 2005          By:        /s/ Boyd Pearce
         --------------                   -----------------------------------
                                          Boyd Pearce
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be
retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request.