alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 702
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 702 appear at 84 FR 1606, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 702.208 Incentives for new credit unions. ( a ) *Assistance in revising business plans.* Upon timely request by a credit union having total assets of less than $10 million (regardless how long it has been in operation), the NCUA Board shall provide assistance in preparing a revised business plan required to be filed under § 702.206.
( b ) *Assistance.* Management training and other assistance to new credit unions will be provided in accordance with policies approved by the NCUA Board.
( c ) *Small credit union program.* A new credit union is eligible to join and receive comprehensive benefits and assistance under NCUA's Small Credit Union Program.
[80 FR 66706, Oct. 29, 2015. Redesignated at 86 FR 11073, Feb. 23, 2021]
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7808

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. LARRY MICHAEL BOLLINGER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Robert J. Conrad, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:12

- cr - 00173

- RJC

- 1 ; 3:17

- cv - 00271

- RJC )

Submitted : February 26, 2021 Decided: March 8, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HARRIS , Circuit Judge , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Matthew Thomas Gilmartin, MATTHEW GILMARTIN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, LLC, North Olmsted, Ohio, for Appellant.
Unpublished o pinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Larry Michael Bollinger seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certi ficate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Sl ack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bollinger has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argumen t would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
05/25/2010 09:56 FAX 2024935142 FAA - DMS 0001/00 1 

Bravo Aviation 

TOOOMerrill AveSuilc3l 

chinoCA 91710 L;-! O'^-F'":^^09WOi'' 

Phone 909-606-8605 J-ax 909-606-8639 - '" 

Dear Sir 

Hearing Docket, FAA,AGC, Room 2014, 600 Independence Ave.SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

AUention: Hearing Docket Clerk 

Aircratl in Contention N8435 I, a 1959 Cessna 182B 2008SO090054 , 

June 25, 2008 (alleged violation date) f^P\f)SO ^^^ ^ / J20/O' ^ 32-^ 

CC Eddie L. Thomas 

Regional Counsel 

And: Christopher R. Stevenson 

Attorney 

Office of The Regional Counsel 

Re: Appeal request against an action -Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty from the FA/V 

To assess a civil penalty in the amount of $10,725 against Bravo Aviation c/o Robert 

Cullen 

Please accept my request for this appeal on the basis ihal it is unfair, and excessive. 

I have already offered lo settle this for $1000 which was refused. 

MY LAST AND FINAL OFFER TO SETTLE TFTLS IS FIRM AT $2500. If this offer is 

accepted I would expect a settlement agreement that says paid in full on the receipt oJ'my 

cashitjfs/heck. 

%l^^^<^ ' 

Robert J. Cullen 

April 27, 2010
§ 111.220 Drug and alcohol testing records. ( a ) Each operator or trustee required to comply with part 120 of this chapter and subject to the applicability of this subpart must report to the PRD the following records for each individual whom the reporting entity has employed as a pilot: ( 1 ) Records concerning drug testing, including— ( i ) Any drug test result verified positive by a Medical Review Officer, that the Medical Review Officer and employer must retain in accordance with § 120.111(a)(1) of this chapter and 49 CFR 40.333(a)(1)(ii);
( ii ) Any refusal to submit to drug testing or records indicating substituted or adulterated drug test results, which the employer must retain in accordance with 49 CFR 40.333(a)(1)(iii);
( iii ) All return-to-duty drug test results verified by a Medical Review Officer, that the employer must retain in accordance with 49 CFR 40.333(a)(1)(ii) or (iii) or (a)(4);
( iv ) All follow-up drug test results verified by a Medical Review Officer, which the employer must retain in accordance with 49 CFR 40.333(a)(1)(v).
( 2 ) Records concerning alcohol misuse, including— ( i ) A test result with a confirmed breath alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater, which the employer must retain in accordance with § 120.219(a)(2)(i)(B) of this chapter;
( ii ) Any record pertaining to an occurrence of on-duty alcohol use, pre-duty alcohol use, or alcohol use following an accident, which the employer must retain in accordance with § 120.219(a)(2)(i)(D) of this chapter;
( iii ) Any refusal to submit to alcohol testing, that the employer must retain in accordance with § 120.219(a)(2)(i)(B) of this chapter and 49 CFR 40.333(a)(1)(iii);
( iv ) All return-to-duty alcohol test results, that the employer must retain in accordance with 49 CFR 40.333(a)(1)(i) or (iii) or (a)(4);
( v ) All follow-up alcohol test results, which the employer must retain in accordance with 49 CFR 40.333(a)(1)(v).
( b ) Each record reported to the PRD in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section must include the following: ( 1 ) In the case of a drug or alcohol test result: ( i ) The type of test administered;
( ii ) The date the test was administered; and
( iii ) The result of the test.
( 2 ) In the case of alcohol misuse, as described in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section: ( i ) The type of each alcohol misuse violation;
( ii ) The date of each alcohol misuse violation.
( c ) In addition to the requirements of §§ 120.113(d)(3) and 120.221(c), operators required to report in accordance with this section must report records within 30 days of the following occurrences, as applicable: ( 1 ) The date of verification of the drug test result;
( 2 ) The date of the alcohol test result;
( 3 ) The date of the refusal to submit to testing; or
( 4 ) The date of the alcohol misuse occurrence.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Open-File Report (2006-1272)

| Home / 	Documentation / 	Map / 	Contacts |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|

## *Preliminary integrated geologic map databases for the United States:*

### Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Vermont

#### By:  Suzanne W. Nicholson1, Connie L. Dicken1, John D. Horton1, Michael P. Foose1, Julia A.L. Mueller1, and Rudi Hon2

##### 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 201922 Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467

#### Version 1.1

#### Updated December 2007 

Choose stateConnecticutMaineMassachusettsNew HampshireNew JerseyRhode IslandVermont

| NOTE: |
|-------|
#### STATE ex rel. COMMISSIONERS OF LAND OFFICE v. KEEN, Dist. Judge.

No. 31163.

Jan. 12, 1943.

*138 P. 2d 78.*

Edwin A. Ellinghausen and Campbell Hippen, both of Oklahoma City, for petitioner.

*698BAYLESS, J.

The State of Oklahoma on relation of the Commissioners of the Land Office have applied to this court to assume original jurisdiction in an original proceeding to consider its petition for a writ of marfdamus directed to the Honorable W. P. Keen, District Judge of Judicial District No. 12, directing him to confirm sheriff’s sales held in some 27 foreclosure proceedings pending in the district courts of the various counties of said judicial district. The court assumed original jurisdiction and directed the respondent to respond within five days, but no response has been filed.

This matter is governed by the decisions heretofore rendered by this court in the case of State ex rel. v. Keen, 185 Okla. 597, 95 P. 2d 851, State ex rel. v. Keen, 187 Okla. 179, 102 P. 2d 143, and Fisher v. Keen, 187 Okla. 5, 100 P. 2d 859, and accordingly the petition for the writ is hereby granted.

The respondent is directed to confirm the sales specified in the petition filed herein and to take other steps to see that sheriff’s deeds are executed and delivered and to take all other and further steps prescribed by law for the completion of the foreclosures involved. It is further ordered that the cost of this proceeding be taxed personally to the respondent. Judgment is hereby rendered against respondent, for which let execution issue. See State ex rel. v. Crum, 185 Okla. 462, 94 P. 2d 231.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.
# C_2022063EN.01000501.xml

| 7.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

4 February 2022

(2022/C 63/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1464 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4432 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84593 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4465 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0567 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 142,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0483 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,360 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 352,92 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5474 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9466 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,5072 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6165 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4583 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9286 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7287 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5419 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 374,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,5875 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2923 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5275 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 493,16 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7914 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,754 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 87,3095 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,797 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,0830 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,5856 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,6445 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1464

JPY

Japanese yen

131,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4432

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84593

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4465

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0567

ISK

Iceland króna

142,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0483

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,360

HUF

Hungarian forint

352,92

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5474

RON

Romanian leu

4,9466

TRY

Turkish lira

15,5072

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6165

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4583

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9286

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7287

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5419

KRW

South Korean won

1 374,04

ZAR

South African rand

17,5875

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2923

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5275

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 493,16

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7914

PHP

Philippine peso

58,754

RUB

Russian rouble

87,3095

THB

Thai baht

37,797

BRL

Brazilian real

6,0830

MXN

Mexican peso

23,5856

INR

Indian rupee

85,6445

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                   QUIPP, INC.

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           AND 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

         I, Michael S. Kady, Chief Executive Officer of Quipp, Inc., a Florida
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:

         (1)      The Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
                  ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                      * * *

/s/ MICHAEL S. KADY
-------------------
Michael S. Kady
Chief Executive Officer

Date:    August 15, 2005
#### § 608.813 Contracting for collection services.

The Chairman, or designee of the Chairman, may contract for collection services in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3718 and 4 CFR 102.6 to recover debts.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER99-978-002]

Take notice that on March 9, 2000, NSTAR Services Co., on behalf of Boston Edison Company (BECo), tendered for filing a refund report in compliance with the Commission's Letter Order issued in Docket Nos. ER99-978-000 and EL99-31-000.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before April 28, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10059 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### STANLEY, FOR THE USE, &c. *v.*LUCAS, SECURITY OF WOOD.

Debt — appeal bond — security—showing property.

It is not sufficient to exonerate a security upon an appeal bond that *he informed*the sheriff having an execution against the original, debtor, of property sufficient to satisfy the judgment.

Debt upon a bond given to appeal a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, against Wood. The defendant pleaded several pleas; the eighth of which was, that the defendant in May, 1819, *informed the sheriff*(who had an execution against Wood on the original judgment) *of property of Wood*more than *sufficient to satisfy the judgment.*To this there was a general demurrer and joinder.

*Rrazee,*for the demurrant,

contended that showing property without a levy was no bar.

*T. Scott,*contra.

Wright J.

delivered the opinion of the Court. It is very clear that a security upon an appeal bond cannot exonerate himself from liability on the bond, by barely *informing*the officer having an execution upon the original judgment against the principal debtor, that the debtor has property. In this case the plea goes no further. It does not show that the plaintiff was advised of the property, or that *in fact there was any;*but only relies upon the fact that the defendant *said to the officer that there was property.*

Demurrer sustained.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements of
Signal  Technology  Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-78248 and 33-78250) of
our report dated February 16, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated  financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Signal Technology  Corporation as
of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended December 31, 1998,  1997,
and 1996, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                               PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 1999
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3500

To prohibit the anticipated extreme reduction in the national marketing 

quotas for the 2004 crop of Flue-cured and Burley tobacco, which, 

if permitted to occur, would mean economic ruin for tobacco farmers 

and their families. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2003

Mr. JONES of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. GOODE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL

To prohibit the anticipated extreme reduction in the national 

marketing quotas for the 2004 crop of Flue-cured and 

Burley tobacco, which, if permitted to occur, would mean 

economic ruin for tobacco farmers and their families.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL MARKETING 

4 QUOTA FOR 2004 CROP OF FLUE-CURED AND 

5 BURLEY TOBACCO AT 2003 LEVEL. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for the 

7 2004 crop year, the Secretary of Agriculture shall estab-
2

•HR 3500 IH 

1 lish and maintain the national marketing quota for Flue2 cured and Burley tobacco at the 2003 level. 

3 SEC. 2. FORFEITURES OF FLUE-CURED AND BURLEY

4 TOBACCO.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—This section shall apply notwith6 standing sections 106 through 106B of the Agricultural 

7 Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1445 through 1445–2). 

8 (b) LOAN FORFEITURE.—A producer-owned coopera9 tive marketing association may fully settle, without further 

10 cost to the association, a loan made for the 2004 crop 

11 of Flue-cured and Burley tobacco by forfeiting to the Com12 modity Credit Corporation the Flue-cured or Burley to13 bacco covered by the loan regardless of the condition of 

14 the tobacco. 

15 (c) TREATMENT OF CCC LOSSES.—Any losses to the 

16 Commodity Credit Corporation as a result of the forfeiture 

17 of tobacco under subsection (b)—

18 (1) shall not be charged to the No Net Cost To19 bacco Account; and 

20 (2) shall not affect the amount of any assess21 ment imposed against Flue-cured or Burley tobacco 

22 under sections 106 through 106B of the Agricultural 

23 Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1445 through 1445–2). 

24 (d) TREATMENT OF FORFEITED TOBACCO.—Tobacco 

25 forfeited under subsection (b) shall not be—
3

•HR 3500 IH 

1 (1) counted for the purpose of determining the 

2 Flue-cured or Burley tobacco quota for any year 

3 pursuant to section 319 of the Agricultural Adjust4 ment Act of 1938 (7 U.S.C. 1314e); or 

5 (2) sold for use in the United States, except 

6 that, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 

7 Commodity Credit Corporation, directly or through 

8 the use of United States leaf dealers, may market 

9 the forfeited tobacco outside the United States.

Æ
**Exhibit21.1**
| **Subsidiary**                                          | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of  Incorporation** |
|---------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|
|                                                    |       |                               |
| Aldila Golf Corp.                                       |       | Delaware, U.S.                     |
|                                                    |       |                               |
| Aldila Materials Technology Corp.                       |       | Delaware, U.S.                     |
|                                                    |       |                               |
| Aldila de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                          |       | Mexico                             |
|                                                    |       |                               |
| Aldila Carbon Fibers Products (Zhuhai) Company  Limited |       | People’s Republic of China    |
|                                                    |       |                               |
| Aldila Composite Products Company Limited               |       | Vietnam                            |

 

----
#### § 268.708 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the Board shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with a disability.
#### Mary G. Seaver, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Merrill-Stevens Shipbuilding Corporation, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

Decision Filed January 23, 1923.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Duval County; George Couper Gibbs,, Judge.

*Butler & Boyer,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Cockrell & Cockrell,*for Defendant in. Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises,- it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and .adjudged by the Court, that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, . Browne and West, J. J., concur.
§ 608.836 Applicability of regulations. ( a ) These regulations apply to the following cases: ( 1 ) Where the FCA is owed a debt by an individual currently employed by another agency;
( 2 ) Where the FCA is owed a debt by an individual who is currently employed by the FCA; or
( 3 ) Where the FCA currently employs an individual who owes a debt to another Federal agency. Upon receipt of proper certification from the creditor agency, the FCA will offset the debtor-employee's salary in accordance with these regulations.
( b ) These regulations do not apply to the following: ( 1 ) Debts or claims rising under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (26 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.*); the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 *et seq.*); the tariff laws of the United States; or to any case where collection of a debt by salary offset is explicitly provided for or prohibited by another statute (e.g., travel advances in 5 U.S.C. 5705 and employee training expenses in 5 U.S.C. 4108).
( 2 ) Any adjustment to pay arising from an employee's election of coverage or a change in coverage under a Federal benefits program requiring periodic deductions from pay if the amount to be recovered was accumulated over four pay periods or less.
( 3 ) A claim which has been outstanding for more than 10 years after the creditor agency's right to collect the debt first accrued, unless facts material to the Government's right to collect were not known and could not reasonably have been known by the official or officials charged with the responsibility for discovery and collection of such debts.