alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 615.5355 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart is applicable to proceedings by the Farm Credit Administration to issue a capital directive under sections 4.3(b) and 4.3A(e) of the Act. A capital directive is an order issued to an institution that does not have or maintain capital at or greater than the minimum ratios set forth in § 615.5205 or § 628.10 of this chapter; or established for the institution under subpart L of this part, by a written agreement under part C of title V of the Act, or as a condition for approval of an application. A capital directive may order the institution to: ( 1 ) Achieve the minimum capital ratios applicable to it by a specified date;
( 2 ) Adhere to a previously submitted plan to achieve the applicable capital ratios;
( 3 ) Submit and adhere to a plan acceptable to the Farm Credit Administration describing the means and time schedule by which the institution shall achieve the applicable capital ratios;
( 4 ) Take other action, such as reduction of assets or the rate of growth of assets, restrictions on the payment of dividends or patronage, or restrictions on the retirement of stock, to achieve the applicable capital ratios, or reduce levels of interest rate and other risk exposures, or strengthen management expertise, or improve management information and measurement systems; or
( 5 ) A combination of any of these or similar actions.
( b ) A capital directive may also be issued to the board of directors of an institution, requiring such board to comply with the requirements of section 4.3A(d) of the Act prohibiting the reduction of permanent capital.
( c ) A capital directive issued under this rule, including a plan submitted under a capital directive, is enforceable in the same manner and to the same extent as an effective and outstanding cease and desist order which has become final as defined in section 5.25 of the Act. Violation of a capital directive may result in assessment of civil money penalties in accordance with section 5.32 of the Act.
[62 FR 4449, Jan. 30, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 39229, July 22, 1998; 81 FR 49778, July 28, 2016]
# Euroopa Liidu C 463I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 463I |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 64. aastakäik16. november 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 463I

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

64. aastakäik16. november 2021

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Teave |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT |
| | Euroopa Komisjon |
| 2021/C 463 I/01 | Teatavates konkurentsimenetlustes ärakuulamise eest vastutava ametniku ametisse nimetamine | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

2021/C 463 I/01

Teatavates konkurentsimenetlustes ärakuulamise eest vastutava ametniku ametisse nimetamine

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

| 16.11.2021 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CI 463/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2021

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CI 463/1

---

Teatavates konkurentsimenetlustes ärakuulamise eest vastutava ametniku ametisse nimetamine

(2021/C 463 I/01)

Tulenevalt Wouter WILSi üleviimisest ja kooskõlas Euroopa Komisjoni presidendi 13. oktoobri 2011. aasta otsusega ärakuulamise eest vastutava ametniku ülesannete ja pädevuse kohta teatavates konkurentsimenetlustes (ELT L 275, 20.10.2011, lk 29) on komisjon nimetanud ärakuulamise eest vastutava ametniku ametikohale alates 1. detsembrist 2021 Eric GIPPINI FOURNIER’.

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25000]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Cape Cod National Seashore; South Wellfleet, MA; Cape Cod 
National Seashore Advisory Commission

ACTION: Two Hundredth Seventieth Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App 1, Section 
10) of a meeting of the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory Commission.

DATES: The meeting of the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 
Commission will be held on November 16, 2009 at 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Commission members will meet in the meeting room at 
Headquarters, 99 Marconi Station, Wellfleet, Massachusetts.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission was reestablished pursuant to 
Public Law 87-126 as amended by Public Law 105-280. The purpose of the 
Commission is to consult with the Secretary of the Interior, or his 
designee, with respect to matters relating to the development of Cape 
Cod National Seashore, and with respect to carrying out the provisions 
of sections 4 and 5 of the Act establishing the Seashore.
    The regular business meeting is being held to discuss the 
following:

1. Adoption of Agenda
2. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meeting (September 14, 2009)
3. Reports of Officers
4. Reports of Subcommittees
5. Superintendent's Report
    <bullet> Update on Dune Shacks
    <bullet> Improved Properties/Town Bylaws
    <bullet> Herring River Wetland Restoration
    <bullet> Wind Turbines/Cell Towers
    <bullet> Highlands Center Update
    <bullet> Alternate Transportation funding
    <bullet> Other construction projects
    <bullet> Land Protection
6. Old Business
7. New Business Ocean initiatives
8. Date and agenda for next meeting
9. Public comment, and
10. Adjournment

    The meeting is open to the public. It is expected that 15 persons 
will be able to attend the meeting in addition to Commission members.
    Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the 
Commission during the business meeting or file written statements. Such 
requests should be made to the park superintendent prior to the 
meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Further information concerning the 
meeting may be obtained from the Superintendent, Cape Cod National 
Seashore, 99 Marconi Site Road, Wellfleet, MA 02667.

    Dated: October 2, 2009.
George E. Price, Jr.,
Superintendent.
[FR Doc. E9-25000 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-WU-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.02


     AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO RESTRICTED STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT (150,000 SHARES)


         WHEREAS, on January 24, 2000, Intuit Inc. (the "Company") and Stephen
M. Bennett ("Purchaser") entered into a Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement (the
"Agreement") with respect to 150,000 shares of common stock of the Company (the
"Shares"); and

         WHEREAS, on January 17, 2001 the Compensation Committee of the
Company's Board of Directors amended the vesting schedule under the Agreement;

         RESOLVED, that Section 5.2 of the Agreement which sets forth the
vesting schedule is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as
follows:

         5.2 Vesting Schedule. The Shares will vest over a five-year period. On
the Effective Date all of the Shares will be Unvested Shares. Provided Purchaser
remains continuously employed with the Company through the applicable vesting
date: (a) 30,000 shares will vest on the first trading day on or following
January 24, 2001 that Purchaser would be permitted to sell the Company's common
stock in compliance with the Company's Insider Trading Policy and applicable
insider trading laws, but in no event later than the last trading day of the
following March (the "First Permitted Trading Date"); (b) the next 90,000 shares
shall vest over the next three years as to 30,000 shares on the First Permitted
Trading Date on or after each of January 24, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively,
and (c) the remaining 30,000 shares shall vest on January 24, 2005. In the event
Purchaser's employment with the Company is terminated due to "INVOLUNTARY
TERMINATION," "TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE" or "TERMINATION FOR DEATH OR
DISABILITY," each as defined in the Employment Agreement, the vesting of the
Shares will accelerate as set forth in Section 5.3 below. In the event
Purchaser's employment with the Company is terminated due to "VOLUNTARY
TERMINATION" or "TERMINATION FOR CAUSE," the Shares will cease vesting on the
date Purchaser's employment with the Company terminates, and the Company or its
assignee(s) will have a Repurchase Option as to all Unvested Shares on such
date. Hereinafter the date on which Purchaser's employment with the Company ends
shall be referred to as the "TERMINATION DATE."

         This Amendment No. 1 is entered into effective as of January 17, 2001.

INTUIT INC.                               PURCHASER

By: /s/ Greg Santora                      /s/ Stephen M. Bennett
--------------------------                -----------------------
Greg Santora                              Stephen M. Bennett
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adelphia Communications Corporation ("Adelphia") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William T. Schleyer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Adelphia,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | /s/WILLIAM T. SCHLEYERWilliam T. Schleyer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 15,
2006

---



QuickLinks
1

BECKHAM, LISA

From: Head, Sara <Sara.Head@aecom.com>

Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 4:18 PM

To: BECKHAM, LISA; Rios, Gerardo; Bohning, Scott; Lyons, Ann; John_Notar@nps.gov;

rbisht@navajo-nsn.gov

Cc: Mark.Hajduk@aps.com; Charles.Spell@aps.com; Richard.Grimes@aps.com;

Neal.Brown@aps.com; Michael.Kafka@pinnaclewest.com; Alan.Papp@aps.com; Hall, 

Bob; Dietrich, Ellen; Paine, Bob

Subject: Revised Four Corners Power Plant SCR Project PSD Application 

Lisa – 

Below are links to the revised PSD application for the FCPP SCR Retrofit Project PSD as discussed between EPA and 

APS. As noted in the cover letter, emissions netting has been applied and now only H2SO4 is PSD applicable, and hence 

no dispersion modeling is required. This application is standalone and completely replaces the two prior submittals in 

October 2013 and March 2014. 

Mark Hajduk is planning to send one complete hard copy of the application to you (and one to Navajo Nation EPA). 

Please let Mark Hajduk (email above or phone number in the cover letter) or I know if you have any questions. 

Sara 

Sara J. Head, QEP 

Vice President 

Environment

D 805-233-3995 M 805-320-8059

sara.head@aecom.com

AECOM 

1220 Avenida Acaso, Camarillo, CA 93012 

T 805-388-3775 F 805-388-3577 

www.aecom.com 

These files will be available for download until 5/5/2014 

File Description Size

140428_SCR PSD Letter(signed).pdf Cover Letter 1,127KB

FCPP SCR PSD Application-April 2014.pdf Revised PSD Application 7,546KB

Download all files (.zip)

If you are having trouble accessing the links in this email, you can view this message as a web page by copying the following link and 

pasting it into your browser: 

https://sendfiles.aecom.com/message.aspx?msgId=9da0d651-dd74-452f-9e61-f74d6d7c4d5e&u=sara.head%40aecom.com

If you have any questions, please contact your project manager.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements listed below of our report dated February 20, 2003 relating to the
financial statements, which appear in the 2002 Annual Report to the Stockholders
of Back Yard Burgers, Inc., which is incorporated by reference in Back Yard
Burgers, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2002.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Description                                            Form/Registration Statement Number
-----------                                            ----------------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>
Back Yard Burgers, Inc.
Incentive Stock Option Plan Of 1993                    Form S-8, No. 333-102737

Back Yard Burgers, Inc.
1995 Incentive Award Plan and 1995 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan                                    Form S-8, No. 33-95180

Back Yard Burgers, Inc.
2002 Equity Incentive Plan                             Form S-8, No. 333-102736
</TABLE>





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------


Memphis, Tennessee
March 25, 2003
#### PORTER *v.*DAILEY.

Costs — bill of discovery — cause—gaming statute — full answer.

Costs will not be decreed the complainant on a bill for discovery, unless cause is shown for resort to the bill, as that the information was requested and refused.

The gaming statute of Ohio makes no difference.

When a bill for discovery is fully answered, and no special cause shown for resorting to chancery, it will be dismissed with costs to the defendant.

Chancery. The bill alleges the loss of $200 in gambling with the defendant. That he brought a suit at law, but finds it difficult, if not impossible to make proof, without a discovery from the defendant, and calls upon him to answer on oath how much money *760he Won from him. Dailey, in his answer, admits the playing, but declares it out of his power to tell how much he lost or won, or which way the balance of the amount is.

760

*Starling*and *Gilbert,*for the complainant,

cited 29 *O. L.*442; 1 *Ves.jr.*423; 1 *Mad. Ch. Pr. 196.*

*G. Swan,*contra,

insisted that costs should be refused unless where it appeared the complainant had requested the information sought before bill, and had been refused, or other cause compelled a resort to chancery: (4 *John. Ch.*504.) On a bill for discovery, the plaintiff pays all costs, unless there are particular reasons for coming into this Court: 1 Mad. *Ch.*217; 1 *Mad. R.*344; 8 *Ves. R.*70; 9 *Ves. R.*108.

Wright, J.

No cause appears for coming here with a bill of discovery. It is not alleged that the information had been requested and refused. Costs are not allowed unless the reason is shown for coming here: (4 *J. Ch. R.*504; 9 *Ves. R.*103.) The statute makes no difference. The bill being answered, and no exception taken, is dismissed with costs to the defendant.
§ 263.303 Filing of safety and soundness compliance plan. ( a ) *Schedule for filing compliance plan* — ( 1 ) *In general.* A State member bank shall file a written safety and soundness compliance plan with the Board within 30 days of receiving a request for a compliance plan pursuant to § 263.302(b), unless the Board notifies the bank in writing that the plan is to be filed within a different period.
( 2 ) *Other plans.* If a State member bank is obligated to file, or is currently operating under, a capital restoration plan submitted pursuant to section 38 of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1831o), a cease-and-desist order entered into pursuant to section 8 of the FDI Act, a formal or informal agreement, or a response to a report of examination or report of inspection, it may, with the permission of the Board, submit a compliance plan under this section as part of that plan, order, agreement, or response, subject to the deadline provided in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) *Contents of plan.* The compliance plan shall include a description of the steps the State member bank will take to correct the deficiency and the time within which those steps will be taken.
( c ) *Review of safety and soundness compliance plans.* Within 30 days after receiving a safety and soundness compliance plan under this subpart, the Board shall provide written notice to the bank of whether the plan has been approved or seek additional information from the bank regarding the plan. The Board may extend the time within which notice regarding approval of a plan will be provided.
( d ) *Failure to submit or implement a compliance plan* — ( 1 ) *Supervisory actions.* If a State member bank fails to submit an acceptable plan within the time specified by the Board or fails in any material respect to implement a compliance plan, then the Board shall, by order, require the bank to correct the deficiency and may take further actions provided in section 39(e)(2)(B). Pursuant to section 39(e)(3), the Board may be required to take certain actions if the bank commenced operations or experienced a change in control within the previous 24-month period, or the bank experienced extraordinary growth during the previous 18-month period.
( 2 ) *Extraordinary growth.* For purposes of paragraph (d)(1) of this section, *extraordinary growth* means an increase in assets of more than 7.5 percent during any quarter within the 18-month period preceding the issuance of a request for submission of a compliance plan, by a bank that is not well capitalized for purposes of section 38 of the FDI Act. For purposes of calculating an increase in assets, assets acquired through merger or acquisition approved pursuant to the Bank Merger Act (12 U.S.C. 1828(c)) will be excluded.
( e ) *Amendment of compliance plan.* A State member bank that has filed an approved compliance plan may, after prior written notice to and approval by the Board, amend the plan to reflect a change in circumstance. Until such time as a proposed amendment has been approved, the bank shall implement the compliance plan as previously approved.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         679,731
<SECURITIES>                                 2,089,637
<RECEIVABLES>                                  199,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                   141,717
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,334,939
<PP&E>                                      38,779,773
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,690,785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,513,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,349,271
<BONDS>                                     27,423,237
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,513,564
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,587,228
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,304,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               544,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             991,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (252,361)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (252,361)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (4.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3400 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3400

    To amend the reclamation laws to clarify that certain man-made 
facilities that receive water from a Bureau of Reclamation Project are 
                         not navigable waters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 29, 2003

 Mr. Otter (for himself, Mr. Cannon, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Nunes, Mr. Ose, 
 and Mr. Pearce) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                       the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the reclamation laws to clarify that certain man-made 
facilities that receive water from a Bureau of Reclamation Project are 
                         not navigable waters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAN-MADE FACILITIES THAT RECEIVE WATER FROM A BUREAU OF 
              RECLAMATION PROJECT ARE NOT NAVIGABLE WATERS.

    The first section of the Act of July 4, 1955 (chapter 271; 43 
U.S.C. 421a), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``That distribution and drainage systems'' 
        and inserting the following:
    ``Sec. 1. (a) Distribution and drainage systems''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Except for reservoirs in navigable streams or rivers, man-
made facilities that receive water from a Bureau of Reclamation Project 
and store or convey water for irrigation or drainage purposes, shall 
not be considered to be navigable waters of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```