alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FTC Consumer Alert

Federal Trade Commission ■ Bureau of Consumer Protection ■ Office of Consumer and Business Education

Just When You Thought It Was Safe...

A different breed of loan shark is preying on unwary consumers by taking their money for the promise of

a loan, credit card or other extension of credit.

Advertisements and promotions for advance-fee loans guarantee or suggest that theres a high likelihood

of success that the loan will be awarded, regardless of the applicants credit history. But, to take advantage of

the offer, the consumer first has to pay a fee. And thats the catch: The consumer pays the fee, the scam artist

takes off with the money, and the loan never materializes.

Legitimate guaranteed offers of credit do not require payments up front. Legitimate lenders may require

consumers to pay application, appraisal or credit report fees, but these fees seldom are required before the

lender is identified and the application completed. In addition, the fees generally are paid to the lender, not to the

broker or arranger of the guaranteed loan.

Legitimate lenders may guarantee firm offers of credit to credit-worthy consumers, but they rarely do this

before evaluating a consumers creditworthiness.

Advertisements for advance-fee loans generally appear in the classified section of daily and weekly newspapers and magazines. Often, the ads feature 900 numbers, which result in charges on your phone bill.

Advance-fee loans also are promoted through direct mail and radio and cable TV spots. The appearance of ads

in media outlets that you recognize  like your local newspaper or radio station  is no guarantee of the

legitimacy of the company behind the ad.

The Federal Trade Commission says you can avoid being bitten by advance-fee loan sharks: Heres how:

 Dont pay for a promise. Its illegal for companies doing business by phone to promise you a loan and ask

you to pay for it before they deliver.

 Ignore any ad  or hang up on any caller  that guarantees a loan in exchange for an advance fee. Legitimate lenders never guarantee or say that you will receive a loan before you apply, especially if you have

bad credit or no credit record.

 Never give your credit card or bank account numbers, or Social Security Number, over the telephone unless

you are familiar with the company and know why the information is necessary.

If you have fallen prey to an advance-fee loan scam, file a complaint with the FTC. Call toll-free 1-877-

FTC-HELP (382-4357) or visit www.ftc.gov  click on Complaint Form.

June 2000

) & ('(5$/75$'( 200,66,21 )7& 25 +( 21680(5

)7&+(/3 ZZZIWFJRY

Advance-Fee Loan Sharks
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 15



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20549



We are aware that our report dated October 22, 1997, on our review of interim
financial information of UNUM Corporation for the three month and nine month
periods ended September 30, 1997, and 1996, and included in the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarters then ended is incorporated by
reference in the following Registration Statements:

  o  Form S-8 No. 33-31270 pertaining to the UNUM Employees 401(k) Plan
     (formerly the UNUM Employees Retirement Savings Plan and Trust)

  o  Form S-8 No. 33-19090 pertaining to the 1987 Executive Stock Option Plan

  o  Form S-8 No. 33-38225 pertaining to the 1990 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan

  o  Form S-8 No. 33-52741 pertaining to the 1990 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan
     (additional shares)

  o  Form S-3 No. 33-36873 pertaining to the 1990 Debt Securities

  o  Form S-3 No. 33-69132 pertaining to the 1993 Debt Securities, Preferred
     Stock, Common Stock and Warrants

  o  Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Registration Statement on
     Form S-4 No. 33-55870 pertaining to the issuance of UNUM Corporation
     shares upon the exercise of stock options granted under the Colonial plans
     as defined therein

  o  Form S-3 No. 333-08187 pertaining to the 1996 Debt Securities, Preferred
     Stock, Common Stock and Warrants

Pursuant to Rule 436 (c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should
not be considered a part of the registration statements prepared or certified by
accountants within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND  L.L.P.
§ 47.1 Authority and purpose. ( a ) *Authority.* 12 U.S.C. 1, 93a, 1462a, 1463, 1464, 1467a, 1818, 1828, 1831n, 1831p-1, 1831w, 1835, 3102(b), 3108(a), 5412(b)(2)(B), (D)-(F).
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part is to promote the safety and soundness of federally chartered or licensed institutions by mitigating the potential destabilizing effects of the resolution of a global systemically important banking entity on an affiliate that is a covered bank (as defined by this part) by requiring covered banks to include in financial contracts covered by this part certain mandatory contractual provisions relating to stays on acceleration and close out rights and transfer rights.
[DESCRIPTION]  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

EX-21               List of Subsidiaries


          THE WELLCARE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.

                  List of Subsidiaries


Name of Corporation and Name
 Under Which Corporation is                     State of    Percentage
     Doing Business                           Incorporation    Owned
                                                        


WellCare of New York, Inc.                    New York          100%


Agente Benefit Consultants,
  Inc. (formerly WellCare
  Administration, Inc.)                       New York          100%


WellCare Medical Management, Inc.(1)          New York          100%


WellCare Development, Inc.                    New York          100%


WellCare of Connecticut, Inc.                 Connecticut       100%


                              

(1)  Assets sold and liabilities assumed by an independent third party.
POCONO MOUNTAINS VISITORS BUREAU 

570 421 5791 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0082 

The Honorable Penny S. Pritzker 

Secretary of Commerce 

U.S. Department of Commerce 

1401 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20230 

Docket No. DOC-2015-0001 

The Honorable John F. Kerry 

Secretary of State 

U.S. Department of State 

2201 C Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20520 

Docket No. DOS-2015-0016 

Dear Secretaries Kerry, Pritzker, and Foxx: 

The Pocono Mountains Visitors Bureau located in northeastern Pennsylvania has 

worked hard to position our region not just as a domestic leisure travel hub, but also 

as an international travel destination. To continue this growth, we support policies 

that provide international travelers easier and more affordable opportunities to 

arrive to the United States. 

That is why we strongly support the policy of Open Skies. Open Skies agreements 

have increased the number of flights to all regions of the United States, leading to 

mo re airline competition, access to new and growing markets, and lower fares. 

These agreements are critical to expand access to mid and interior markets such as 

our destination. 

If we are to effectively compete in the market for global travele rs, we need to 

preserve policies like Open Skies that grow the market for international travel of all 

types. More competition and more choice for travelers is unquesti onably good for 

570 421 6927 fax 

800poconos.com 1004 West Main Street Stroudsburg, PA 18360 

_ .. n:~ 

() Printed on Recycled Paper 
both American travelers as well as for international visitors and business people 

who want to come to the U.S. and do business. 

Open Skies allows for our destination to compete aggressively with other 

destinations around the country and around the world. This new competition allows 

our industry to attract travelers from new markets globally. 

That same spirit applies to competition in international aviation as well. We 

strongly urge you to preserve all existing Open Skies agreements and vigorously 

work to expand this successful policy. 

t!~ Carl G. Wilgu~ ~~ '(;l,ll../ 

President/CEO
§ 614.4530 Special loans, production credit associations and agricultural credit associations. Under policies approved by the bank board and procedures developed by the bank, production credit associations and agricultural credit associations may make the following special types of loans on commodities covered by price support programs. Notwithstanding the regulations covering other loans made by an association, loans may be made to members on any commodity for which a Commodity Credit Corporation price support program is in effect, at such rate of interest and upon such terms as the bank board may prescribe subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The commodity offered as security for the loan shall be eligible for price support under a Commodity Credit Corporation price support program and shall be stored in a bonded public warehouse, holding storage agreement for such commodity approved by Commodity Credit Corporation.
( b ) The member shall have complied with all Commodity Credit Corporation eligibility requirements.
( c ) The loan shall mature not later than 30 days prior to the expiration of the period during which the Commodity Credit Corporation loan or other price support may be obtained on the commodity and shall be secured by pledge of negotiable warehouse receipts covering the commodity.
( d ) The borrower shall appoint the association as his attorney-in-fact to obtain a Commodity Credit Corporation loan (or other such price support as is available) in the event that the borrower fails to do so prior to maturity or repayment of the loan.
[37 FR 11424, June 7, 1972. Redesignated at 46 FR 51878, Oct. 22, 1981, and amended at 55 FR 24886, June 19, 1990]
#### John McClave, Respondent, *v.*John McAinsh, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Oourt of the city of Hew York, tenth district, borough of Manhattan.

*777G. W. Dease, for appellant.

Jeroloman *&*Arrowsmith, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The plaintiff undertook to show on the trial that the defendant, in March, 1900, leased the premises described in the complaint for a year from the 1st of May, 1900. His testimony which was the sole testimony on that point was contradicted by the defendant. If this was the whole case we would not interfere with the decision of the justice, who had the witnesses before him, but the plaintiff is contradicted by his letters of the 19th and 20th of April, 1900, in which letters he does not claim that there had been a new leasing, but claims the right to hold the defendant under the old lease. It seems to ns that if the plaintiff had made an oral lease with the defendant as claimed by him, the plaintiff, he would not have written the letters above referred to. In both of the letters he puts his right to hold the defendant upon the ground that because of defendant’s failure to give him a three months’ notice of his, the defendant’s intention not to renew a lease, he thereby became responsible for the rent of the premises for a full year commencing May first. In his letter of April twentieth plaintiff says: “ I decline to release you from the payment of rent of said building upon the ground set forth in my letter of yesterday. Viz.: That under the terms of the lease, if it was your intention to vacate you should have given me notice on or before February first last.”

A careful perusal of the evidence convinces us that there was no new leasing.

Judgment is reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Tetjax, P. J., Scott and Du geo, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
ANEXO A

Relación de reclamaciones objeto de la Quingentésima quincuagésima octava objeción 

global 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23093-2 Filed:12/16/22 Entered:12/16/22 18:45:28 Desc:

Exhibit Anexo A Page 1 of 2
NOMBRE

QUINGENTÉSIMA QUINCUAGÉSIMA OCTAVA OBJECIÓN COLECTIVA

Anexo A – Reclamos Sustantivos Duplicados

MONTO DE LA 

RECLAMACIÓN

N.° DE 

RECLAMACIÓN

NÚMERO DE

CASO/DEUDOR

FECHA DE 

PRESENTACIÓN

 RECLAMACIONES A SER DESETIMADAS RECLAMACION REMANENTE

NOMBRE

MONTO DE LA 

RECLAMACIÓN

N.° DE

RECLAMACIÓN

NÚMERO DE 

CASO/DEUDOR

BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF PMC 

MARKETING CORP. BANK. 

CASE NO. 09-02048

NOREEN WISCOVITCHRENTAS, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE

PMB 136 400 CALLE JUAN 

CALAF

SAN JUAN, PR 00918

1 AUTORIDAD DE 10198

ENERGÍA 

ELECTRICA DE 

PUERTO RICO

5/2/2018

17-03283

PMC MARKETING CORP.

ATTN: RAFAEL A. GONZALEZ 

VALIENTE

GODREAU & GONZALEZ LAW

P.O. BOX 9024176

SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4176

AUTORIDAD DE 166452

ENERGÍA 

ELECTRICA DE 

PUERTO RICO

5/24/2018 $1,154,734.06

17-03283

Base para: La Evidencia de Reclamación afirma obligaciones que son duplicación de otra Evidencia de Reclamación presentada

BLUE BEETLE III, LLC C/O 

ELAM LLC

C/O ISMAEL H. HERRERO III, 

ESQ.

P.O. BOX 362159

SAN JUAN, PR 00936

2 AUTORIDAD DE 180510

ENERGÍA 

ELECTRICA DE 

PUERTO RICO

8/31/2022

17-03283

BLUUE BEETLE III, LLC C/O 

ELAM LLC

C/O ISMAEL H. HERRERO III, 

ESQ.

P.O. BOX 362159

SAN JUAN, PR 00936

AUTORIDAD DE 180509

ENERGÍA 

ELECTRICA DE 

PUERTO RICO

8/31/2022 $160,121,820.08

17-03283

Base para: La Evidencia de Reclamación afirma obligaciones que son duplicación de otra Evidencia de Reclamación presentada

RODRIGUEZ LABOY, ANDRES

HC-65 BOX 6395

PATILLAS, PR 00723

3 AUTORIDAD DE 10752

ENERGÍA 

ELECTRICA DE 

PUERTO RICO

5/11/2018

17-03283

LABOY, ANDRES RODRIGUEZ

PO BOX 201

ARROYO, PR 00714

AUTORIDAD DE 60575

ENERGÍA 

ELECTRICA DE 

PUERTO RICO

6/6/2018 $10,000.00

17-03283

Base para: La Evidencia de Reclamación afirma obligaciones que son duplicación de otra Evidencia de Reclamación presentada

YFN YABUCOA SOLAR LLC

C/O ISMAEL H. HERRERO III, 

ESQ.

P.O. BOX 362159

SAN JUAN, PR 00936

4 AUTORIDAD DE 179661

ENERGÍA 

ELECTRICA DE 

PUERTO RICO

10/20/2021

17-03283

YFN YABUCOA SOLAR LLC

C/O ISMAEL H. HERRERO III, 

ESQ.

P.O. BOX 362159

SAN JUAN, PR 00936

AUTORIDAD DE 179660

ENERGÍA 

ELECTRICA DE 

PUERTO RICO

10/20/2021 $155,814,657.86

17-03283

Base para: La Evidencia de Reclamación afirma obligaciones que son duplicación de otra Evidencia de Reclamación presentada

Pagina 1 de 1

* - Indica que la reclamación contiene montos por liquidar o indeterminados

$1,154,734.06

$160,121,820.08

$10,000.00

$155,814,657.86

FECHA DE 

PRESENTACIÓN

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23093-2 Filed:12/16/22 Entered:12/16/22 18:45:28 Desc:

Exhibit Anexo A Page 2 of 2
#### § 410.111 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the head of the agency finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this regulation.
#### GILL AND BENNET *v.*FAWCETT.

Substitution of one debtor for another — agreement to pay another — privity#

Where A. owes B. and agrees with C. that C. shall pay it, and B. agrees to accept C. in *Af&*stead, this is no discharge of A. without C. has agreed with B. to pay, until such agreement *with*B. he is not privy to the agreement, and has no right of action against C.

Assumpsit for goods sold. It appeared in evidence that the defendant, after he received the goods, sold out his stock to a partnership, who agreed with him to pay the plaintiff’s demand. The defendant, before he sold' the goods, had asked the plaintiffs if they were willing to take the new firm, and received for answer that they were. The sale was made, but the purchasers would not give their obligation for the debt.

Chester; for the plaintiff,

moved to reject that part of the testimony which related to the conversation about taking the new firm.

*Caswell*and *Starr,*

cited *Gow on Part.*201, 324; 3 *Barn,*and Aid. 127; 13 *John. R.*87; 17 *John. R.*340.

*Fox,*contra,

cited 2 *O. R.*91, and *Gow*326.

By the Court.

Whatever weight there may be in the objection urged, it does not go to the *competency*of the testimony. The *effect*of the evidence is for the jury. We are not now to judge of it.

Lane, J.

to the jury. The testimony is, that Fawcett refused to sell the goods, till the plaintiffs agreed to take the new firm as their paymaster — he then sold; but he did not see to procure the new firm to become paymaster to the plaintiffs. He took their word that they would pay the plaintiff and there left the matter. The plaintiffs agreed to accept the new firm, and were bound to do so, if they had offered; but-they have no obligation on them nor right of action against them. The new firm never agreed *with them*to pay the old debt, and therefore, it remains as it was. The defendant has never substituted any other liability for his own, nor exonerated himself. We think the defence not made out.

Verdict for the plaintiff and judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000                  
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS                  
                                 
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS     
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAY-31-1997    
<PERIOD-START>                               JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 AUG-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1  
<CASH>                                            24,557     
<SECURITIES>                                           0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                     34,462  
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0  
<INVENTORY>                                      371,519  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0  
<PP&E>                                             2,498  
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   467,143  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0  
<BONDS>                                          261,065  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0  
<PREFERRED>                                            0  
<COMMON>                                              71  
<OTHER-SE>                                       137,909  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     467,143  
<SALES>                                          183,664  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 187,646  
<CGS>                                            149,674  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,184  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   15,596  
<INCOME-TAX>                                       6,360  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                9,236  
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0  
<CHANGES>                                              0  
<NET-INCOME>                                       9,236  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       1.32  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .95  
                                               

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 24227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated December 13, 1999, and published in the Federal 
Register on December 28, 1999, (64 FR 248), Polaroid Corporation, 1265 
Main Street, Building W6, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, made 
application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be 
registered as a bulk manufacturer of 2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine (7396), a 
basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule I.
    The firm plans to manufacture 2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine for 
conversion into a non-controlled substance.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in title 21, United States Code, section 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of Polaroid Corporation to manufacture 
2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated Polaroid Corporation to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation included inspection and testing of the company's physical 
security systems, verification of the company's compliance with State 
and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. 
Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR. 0.100 and 0.104, the 
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby 
orders that the application submitted by the above firm for 
registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled 
substance listed above is granted.

    Dated: April 6, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-10210 Filed 4-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### § 651.35 [Reserved]
Order entered November 15, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00186-CR

DANNY ARAGONMARQUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-12099-U

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 9, 2022 motion seeking a third 

extension of time to file appellant’s brief. In the motion, appellant explains that the 

brief has not been filed because appellant and a member of appellant’s family have 

informed appellate counsel that the family has retained attorney Scottie Allen to 

represent appellant in this appeal. The Court has not received any communication 

from Mr. Allen showing he is representing appellant. Appellant requests an 
–2–

extension to November 23, 2022 so that appointed counsel may determine the 

status of appellant’s representation and file the brief.

We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant to file, by 

November 23, 2022, either appellant’s brief or a motion to substitute counsel. If 

appellant fails to comply with this order, the Court may abate this appeal so allow

the trial court to conduct a hearing on the status of appellant’s representation and 

brief.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE