alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Cason *v.*Aldred *et al.*

Atkinson, *J.*

1. “‘Liens for taxes due the State or any *county*thereof, *or*municipal corporation therein, shall cover the .property of taxpayers liable to tax, from the time fixed by law for valuation of the same in each year until such taxes are paid. . . Such liens for taxes are hereby declared superior to all other liens.’ Civil Code (1910), § 3333. ‘Taxes shall be paid before any other debt, lien, or claim whatsoever, and the property returned or held at the time of giving in, or after, is always subject.’ Civil Code (1910), § 1140; *Verdery*v. Dotterer, 69 *Ga.*194 (2). This applies to all property returned or held by a taxpayer that is subject to taxation under the constitution of this State. *Phœnix Mutual Life Ins. Co.*v. *Appling County,*164 *Ga.*861 (139 S. E. 674).” *Decatur County Building & Loan Association*v. *Thigpen,*173 *Ga.*363 (160 S. E. 387).

2. Where property is subject to a lien and part of it is sold by the debtor, the part remaining in him should be first applied to the payment of the lien. Civil Code, § 6029; *Askew*v. *Scottish American Mortgage Co.,*114 *Ga.*300 (40 S. E. 256); *Noles*v. *Few,*155 *Ga.*471 (117 S. E. 374); *Columbia Trust & Realty Co.*v. *Alston,*163 *Ga.*83 (135 S. E. 431); *Herrington*v. *Parham,*166 *Ga.*204 (142 S. E. 858); *Douglas*v. *Hannahatchee Ranch Corporation,*168 *Ga.*238 (147 S. E. 518).

*257No. 8553.

August 9, 1932.

3. Under application of the foregoing principles to the pleadings and uncontradieted evidence in this case, the judge erred in refusing a temporary injunction. The foregoing ruling disposes of a controlling question in this case, and it is unnecessary to determine whether the facts show satisfaction of the tax executions and discharge of the lien by payment of the tax. *Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*258*Evans &*Evans, for plaintiff. *W. C.*McMillan, for defendants.
#### Albert T. SCOTT *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 73-7

493 S.W. 2d 143

Opinion delivered April 23, 1973

*William C. McArthur,*for appellant.

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., by: *Gene O'Daniel,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellant Albert T. Scott seeks to set aside his guilty plea to a robbery charge on the ground that the charge should have been dismissed for failure to prosecute within the speedy trial provisions of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-1708 (Repl. 1964), to wit:

> “If any person indicted for any offense, and committed to prison, shall not be brought to trial before the end of the second term of the court having jurisdiction of the offense, which shall be held after the finding of such indictment, he shall be discharged so far as relates to the offense for which he was committed, unless the delay shall happen on the application of the prisoner.”

The record shows that a robbery occurred on October 14, 1967, in which appellant and two other persons were involved. Charges were filed on November 22, 1967, while appellant was a fugitive. He was not arrested until September 24, 1970. The September term of court commenced on September 28, 1970, and did not end until the March term began on March 1, 1971. During the March term appellant entered a plea of guilty on July 7, 1971.

*317The record conclusively shows that appellant after his arrest was brought to trial before the end of the second term commencing after his arrest. Thus he does not bring himself within the terms of the statute. See *Stewart*v. *State,*13 Ark. 720 (1850).

Affirmed.
§ 325.3 Applicability. ( a ) *Covered banks subject to stress testing.* ( 1 ) A state nonmember bank or state savings association that is a covered bank as of December 31, 2019, is subject to the requirements of this part for the 2020 reporting year.
( 2 ) A state nonmember bank or state savings association that becomes a covered bank after December 31, 2019, shall conduct its first stress test under this part in the first reporting year that begins more than three calendar quarters after the date the state nonmember bank or state savings association becomes a covered bank, unless otherwise determined by the Corporation in writing.
( b ) *Ceasing to be a covered bank.* A covered bank shall remain subject to the stress test requirements of this part unless and until total consolidated assets of the covered bank falls to $250 billion or less for each of four consecutive quarters as reported on the covered bank's most recent Call Reports. The calculation will be effective on the as-of date of the fourth consecutive Call Report.
( c ) *Covered bank subsidiaries of a bank holding company or savings and loan holding company subject to periodic stress test requirements.* ( 1 ) Notwithstanding the requirements applicable to covered banks under this section, a covered bank that is a consolidated subsidiary of a bank holding company or savings and loan holding company that is required to conduct a periodic company-run stress test under applicable regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System may elect to conduct its stress test and report to the FDIC on the same timeline as its parent bank holding company or savings and loan holding company.
( 2 ) A covered bank that elects to conduct its stress test under paragraph (c)(1) of this section will remain subject to the same timeline requirements of its parent company until otherwise approved by the FDIC.
[84 FR 56933, Oct. 24, 2019; 84 FR 64985, Nov. 26, 2019]
### This document contains CBI and is not available online or from the EPA Docket Center.

Please contact : Lu -Ann Kleibacker Program in Human Research Ethics United States Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Penns yl vania Ave., NW Room 51169, Mail Code 810 5R Washington, DC 20460 Phone - 202 - 564 - 7189 Cell - 202 - 713 - 7900 Fax - 202 - 564 - 2070 Em ail: kleibacker.lu - ann@epa.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         579,212
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               579,212
<PP&E>                                       4,668,416
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,469,474
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,806,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          604,988
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,201,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,806,662<F1>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               368,557
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               301,462
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    98,696
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.54<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>REFERS TO GENERAL PARTNERS + LIMITED PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F2>95% LIMITED PARTNERS-INTEREST OUTSTANDING=20,653.69
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT '

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22660-4 Filed:10/21/22 Entered:10/21/22 10:47:13 Desc:

Exhibit 1-D Page 1 of 7

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23214-5 Filed:01/09/23 Entered:01/09/23 14:11:14 Desc:

Exhibit 1-D Page 1 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22660-4 Filed:10/21/22 Entered:10/21/22 10:47:13 Desc:

Exhibit 1-D Page 2 of 7

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23214-5 Filed:01/09/23 Entered:01/09/23 14:11:14 Desc:

Exhibit 1-D Page 2 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22660-4 Filed:10/21/22 Entered:10/21/22 10:47:13 Desc:

Exhibit 1-D Page 3 of 7

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23214-5 Filed:01/09/23 Entered:01/09/23 14:11:14 Desc:

Exhibit 1-D Page 3 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22660-4 Filed:10/21/22 Entered:10/21/22 10:47:13 Desc:

Exhibit 1-D Page 4 of 7

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23214-5 Filed:01/09/23 Entered:01/09/23 14:11:14 Desc:

Exhibit 1-D Page 4 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22660-4 Filed:10/21/22 Entered:10/21/22 10:47:13 Desc:

Exhibit 1-D Page 5 of 7

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23214-5 Filed:01/09/23 Entered:01/09/23 14:11:14 Desc:

Exhibit 1-D Page 5 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22660-4 Filed:10/21/22 Entered:10/21/22 10:47:13 Desc:

Exhibit 1-D Page 6 of 7

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23214-5 Filed:01/09/23 Entered:01/09/23 14:11:14 Desc:

Exhibit 1-D Page 6 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22660-4 Filed:10/21/22 Entered:10/21/22 10:47:13 Desc:

Exhibit 1-D Page 7 of 7

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23214-5 Filed:01/09/23 Entered:01/09/23 14:11:14 Desc:

Exhibit 1-D Page 7 of 7
Editorial Note on Part 702
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 702 appear at 84 FR 1606, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 702.211 Payment of dividends. ( a ) *Restriction on dividends.* Dividends shall be available only from net worth, net of any special reserves established under § 702.208, if any.
( b ) *Payment of dividends and interest refunds.* The board of directors may not pay a dividend or interest refund that will cause the credit union's capital classification to fall below adequately capitalized under subpart A of this part unless the appropriate regional director and, if state-chartered, the appropriate state official, have given prior written approval (in an RBP or otherwise). The request for written approval must include the plan for eliminating any negative retained earnings balance.
[80 FR 66706, Oct. 29, 2015. Redesignated at 86 FR 11073, Feb. 23, 2021]
EXHIBIT 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Delta and Pine Land Company ("D&PL") on
Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W. Thomas Jagodinski,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
         and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations
         of D&PL.

Date: November 14, 2006

/s/ W. Thomas Jagodinski
------------------------
W. Thomas Jagodinski
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.2
                          CERTIFICATION

I, James Ivchenko, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Epolin, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue  statements of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact  necessary  to make the statements made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under  which  such  statements  were   made,   not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,  and
other  financial  information included  in  this  report,  fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of  operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,  and  for,
the periods presented in this report;

      4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls  and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act  Rules  13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

           (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us  by  others  within  those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report  is
being prepared;

           (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report  our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls  and procedures, as of the end of the period covered  by
this report based on such evaluation; and

           (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting  that
occurred  during the small business issuer's most  recent  fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely  to
materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal  control
over financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and  I  have  disclosed, based on our most recent  evaluation  of
internal  control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a)    All   significant  deficiencies  and  material
weaknesses  in the design or operation of internal  control  over
financial  reporting  which are reasonable  likely  to  adversely
affect  the  small business issuer's ability to record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

           (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in  the
small   business   issuer's  internal  control   over   financial
reporting.


Dated: January 11, 2006         By:/s/ James Ivchenko
                                James Ivchenko,
                                President (Principal Financial
                                Officer)
Exhibit 31.1Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CertificationI, Arnie Geller, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Premier Exhibitions, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 

 
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: January 9, 2007/s/ Arnie Geller
#### § 651.2 [Reserved]
#### REYNOLDS v. CLARK, ET AL.

Patent to heirs — trust—defective deed — contract—wife’s estate — qua timet — chancery*

A patent issued to one of several heirs for land entered by the ancestor, passes the fee in trust for the grantee and his co-heirs.

Releases of land defective as conveyances, will avail the party in equity, as contracts.

A contract by husband and wife of her land is good only for the husband’s interest.

Where the entire title cannot be granted to the complainant, the court will decree releases of as many parties as it can reach. f,

Chancery. Bill to enjoin execution on a recovery in ejectment, and to compel a release of the land. The case is stated by the Court in its opinion.

*J. II.*James, for the complainant.

*Mason*and Anthony, for the defendant.

Wright, J.

Thomas and Richard Clark entered at the United States’ land office a quarter section of land. Richard died in 1814. The two first payments on the land were made in his lifetime, and probably the third — the last was paid after his death. Where funds were applied to pay either, does not appear, and so we must suppose each paid his own portion. Richard left 5 or *‡*600 worth of property at his. death, which went to the possession of Thomas' without any grant of administration. In 1816, after *Richard’s*death, a patent issued for the land to him and *Thomas.*Under this patent, Thomas took the entire estate — one half for *himself-*— the other half as trustee for the five heirs of *Richard,*himself being *one of the Jive.*After the date of the patent, Nichols and wife, Robert and Jane, three of the heirs, released their interest .to Thomas, and Jane has since died without issue or administration. These releases being without acknowledgments, are defective as conveyances, and good as contracts. As to Mrs. Boyd, another heir, it is sought to charge her as well as the others with fraud in lying by and witnessing the progress of the improvements without objection. The declarations of Mrs. Boyd, in proof, are too vague to divest her of an interest in the land, and the allegation of fraud is without proof. The release of Nichols and wife is operative as a *657contract against him, and will affect *his*interest, though it is invalid as against *her*for her estate. Thomas Clark has conveyed to the complainants, who are possessed and have improved.

We think the complainants have a right to be quieted in their title and to releases from Robert and Nichols and his wife. They hold the fee of *one-tenth*in trust for *Mrs.*Nichols, and one-tenth for Mrs. Boyd, which they should convey to them.

Decree that Robert and Nichols release in sixty days, and Nichols procure his wife to unite in a release, and if she refuse, that he compensate the plaintiff in damages. The complainants hold Mrs. Nichols’ share in trust for her, &c. if she refuse, subject to their interest in it during the life of her husband.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, 

et. al.

Debtors1

 

PROMESA 

Title III 

Case No. 17-BK-03283 (LTS) 

(Jointly Administered) 

In re: 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of 

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER 

AUTHORITY (“PREPA”) 

Debtor2

 

PROMESA 

Title III 

Case No. 17-BK-04780 (LTS) 

(Jointly Administered) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT 

 The undersigned hereby certifies that I caused true and correct copies of the Second 

Interim Fee Application of King & Spalding LLP for compensation for services rendered and 

reimbursement of expenses incurred as attorneys for the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 

for the period April 1, 2022 through January 1, 2023 as Docket No. 23814 in Case No. 17-BK1 The Debtors in the relevant Title III cases, along with their respective Title III case number listed as a 

bankruptcy case number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number 

are as follows: (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK- 3283 (LTS)) (Last Four 

Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); and (ii) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy 

Case No. 17-BK-4780) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747).

2 See note 1. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23840 Filed:03/21/23 Entered:03/21/23 12:32:35 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
03283 (LTS) and as Docket No. 3338 in Case No. 17-BK-04780 (LTS) (the “Application”), served 

in the following manner on March 16th, 2023: 

1. Electronically through the Court’s CM/ECF system in Case No. 17-03283 (LTS) and 

in Case No. 17-04780 (LTS); 

2. By U.S. mail to each of the parties listed in Exhibit A attached hereto; 

3. By e-mail to each of the parties listed in Exhibit B attached hereto, and; 

4. By FedEx overnight delivery to the chambers of the Honorable Laura Taylor Swain at 

the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Daniel P. 

Moynihan U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, Suite 3212, New York, NY 10007. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. 

 In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 21st day of March, 2023. 

SANCHEZ LRV LLC 

270 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 1110 

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918 

Tel. 787-522-6776 

Fax 787-522-6777 

s/ Janelle Reyes-Maisonet

Janelle Reyes-Maisonet 

USDC-PR 231102 

jreyes@sanchezlrv.com 

Counsel for King & Spalding LLP

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23840 Filed:03/21/23 Entered:03/21/23 12:32:35 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2