alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### PUTNAM v. LARIMORE.

Deposition — how certified — swearing the witness — writing the deposition.

Depositions taken under the statute, should show that the witness was first sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth, &c.; an affidavit, written out before and sworn to be true, is not. a deposition.

Depositions should be written as the statement is given by the witness, under the solemnity of the oath, by the witness or justice, or by a disinterested person in his presence.

*Irvin,*

excepted to depositions filed in this cause,

1. Because it does not appear the witness was sworn to testify the truth, the whole truth, &c. under the statute.

2. Because it is not shown that the deposition was reduced to writing by the witness, the justice, or by any disinterested person, in the witness’s presence.

*Olds,*contra.

By the Court.

The statute (29 *O. L.*124) expressly provides;, *747that the witness shall be sworn to testify the truth, the whole truth, and noting but the truth, and he shall write his testimony, or the magistrate, or some other disinterested person shall reduce it to writing in his presence. The mayor who took this deposition, certifies that the witness appeared before him, and made oath that his deposition annexed, was in all respects just and true, &e. It is but an ex parte affidavit, drawn up without the solemnity of an oath and sworn to be true. In this way we have no certainty of getting all the witness knows, or any thing more than the party calling him wishes him to say. The intention of the statute is that the witness whose deposition is taken, shall be first sworn, and then relate his story, under the obligation to tell not only the truth, but the whole truth. If a witness were to tell his story to the court, and afterwards swear that what he said was in all respects true, it would be at once seen to be wrong.

The exceptions are allowed.
§ 794.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford a handicapped person an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the handicapped person.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf person (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and adminstrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 794.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, handicapped persons receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
§ 622.60 Payment of civil money penalty. ( a ) *Payment date.* Generally, the date designated in the notice of assessment for payment of the civil money penalty will be 60 days from the issuance of the notice. If, however, the Board finds, in a specific case, that the purposes of the relevant statutes would be better served if the 60-day period were changed, the Board may shorten or lengthen the period or make the civil money penalty payable immediately upon receipt of the notice of assessment. If a timely request for a formal hearing to challenge an assessment of a civil money penalty is filed, payment of the penalty will not be required unless and until the Board issues a final order of assessment following the hearing. If an assessment order is issued, it will specify the date by which the civil money penalty is to be paid or collected.
( b ) *Method of payment.* Checks in payment of civil money penalties must be made payable to the “Farm Credit Administration.” Upon collection, the FCA will forward payment for penalties described in § 622.52(a) and (b) to the United States Department of Treasury. The FCA will forward payment for penalties described in § 622.52(c) to the National Flood Mitigation Fund as required by 42 U.S.C. 4012a(f)(8).
[70 FR 12585, Mar. 15, 2005]
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                   QUIPP, INC.

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
          RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



         I, Michael S. Kady, Chief Executive Officer of Quipp, Inc., a Florida
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:

         (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      * * *




/s/ Michael S. Kady
-------------------
Michael S. Kady
Chief Executive Officer

Date:    May 15, 2003
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, P. Kay Wagoner, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Icagen, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ P. KAY WAGONER, PH.D.P. Kay Wagoner, Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer and President


Date: April 27, 2007
```

[House Report 106-1015]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                    106-1015

======================================================================

 
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTIONS 121, 122, 123, 
  AND 124, EACH MAKING FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL 
  YEAR 2001

                                _______
                                

  October 29, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 662]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 662, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for consideration in the House of 
House Joint Resolutions 121, 122, 123, and 124, each making 
further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2001, under 
separate closed rules. The rule waives all points of order 
against consideration of each joint resolution. The rule also 
provides one hour of debate on each joint resolution equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Appropriations. Finally, the rule 
provides one motion to recommit each joint resolution.

                                  

```
#### § 7.1018 National bank automatic payment plan accounts.

A national bank may, for the benefit and convenience of its savings depositors, adopt an automatic payment plan under which a savings account will earn dividends at the current rate paid on regular savings accounts. The depositor, upon reaching a previously designated age, receives his or her accumulated savings and earned interest in installments of equal amounts over a specified period.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3340 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3340

   To redesignate the facilities of the United States Postal Service 
located at 7715 and 7748 S. Cottage Grove Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, 
  as the ``James E. Worsham Post Office'' and the ``James E. Worsham 
    Carrier Annex Building'', respectively, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2003

  Mr. Rush (for himself, Mr. Emanuel, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Costello, Ms. 
Schakowsky, Mr. Johnson of Illinois, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Evans, 
  Mr. Jackson of Illinois, and Mr. Shimkus) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To redesignate the facilities of the United States Postal Service 
located at 7715 and 7748 S. Cottage Grove Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, 
  as the ``James E. Worsham Post Office'' and the ``James E. Worsham 
    Carrier Annex Building'', respectively, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JAMES E. WORSHAM POST OFFICE.

    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 7715 S. Cottage Grove Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, 
shall be known and designated as the ``James E. Worsham Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in this section shall be deemed to be a reference to the James E. 
Worsham Post Office.

SEC. 2. JAMES E. WORSHAM CARRIER ANNEX BUILDING.

    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 7748 S. Cottage Grove Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, 
shall be known and designated as the ``James E. Worsham Carrier Annex 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in this section shall be deemed to be a reference to the James E. 
Worsham Carrier Annex Building.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 708a.310 Limits on compensation of officials.

No director or senior management official of an insured credit union may receive any economic benefit in connection with the merger of a credit union other than reasonable compensation and other benefits paid in the ordinary course of business.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING

 

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 33-70050,33-80985, 333-32237 and 333-57754 of Aldila, Inc. on Form S-8 and RegistrationStatements Nos. 33-81792 and 333-177883 on Form S-3 of (1) our report withrespect to the Company's consolidated financial statements dated March 9, 2007(except for Notes 13, 15, and the Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securitiessection of Note 1 to the aforementioned financial statements included elsewhereherein and the fifth and sixth paragraphs of such report, as to which the dateis March 28, 2008) and (2) our report with respect to the Company'seffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting dated March 9, 2007(except for the first, fifth and sixth paragraphs of such report, as to whichthe date is March 28, 2008), both appearing in this Annual Report on Form10-K/A of Aldila, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

 
| /s/ Squar, Milner,  Peterson, Miranda & Williamson, LLP |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                        |   |   |
| San Diego,  California                                      |   |   |
| March 28,  2008                                             |   |   |

 

 

----
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000754813
<NAME>                        LASERGATE SYSTEMS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-1997 
<CASH>                               135,678  
<SECURITIES>                               0  
<RECEIVABLES>                        863,083  
<ALLOWANCES>                         149,479  
<INVENTORY>                          127,072  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   1,058,861  
<PP&E>                               330,415  
<DEPRECIATION>                       213,668  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     4,540,667  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              2,635,790  
<BONDS>                                    0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0  
<PREFERRED>                              238  
<COMMON>                             223,862  
<OTHER-SE>                         1,540,777  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       4,540,667  
<SALES>                            2,304,464  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   2,304,464  
<CGS>                              1,801,066  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      3,674,665  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      18,525  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (1,351,676) 
<INCOME-TAX>                               0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (1,351,676) 
<DISCONTINUED>                             0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0  
<CHANGES>                                  0  
<NET-INCOME>                      (1,351,676) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.18) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0  
                                


</TABLE>
#### § 617.7405 On what policies are loan restructurings based?

Loan restructurings must be made in accordance with the policy adopted by the supervising bank board of directors under section 4.14A(g) of the Act.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 702](/current/title-12/part-702?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 702 appear at [84 FR 1606](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-1606), Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 702.407 Discounting of amount treated as Regulatory Capital.

The amount of outstanding Subordinated Debt that may be treated as Regulatory Capital shall reduce by 20 percent per annum of the initial aggregate principal amount of the applicable Subordinated Debt (as reduced by prepayments or amounts extinguished to cover a deficit under [§ 702.404(a)(6)](/on/2024-09-19/title-12/section-702.404#p-702.404(a)(6))), as required by the following schedule:

Table 1 to [§ 720.407](/on/2024-09-19/title-12/section-720.407)

| Remaining maturity | Balance treated as regulatory capital % |
| --- | --- |
| Four to less than five years | 80 |
| Three to less than four years | 60 |
| Two to less than three years | 40 |
| One to less than two years | 20 |
| Less than one year | 0 |
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             BACK YARD BURGERS, INC.

I, Lattimore M. Michael, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Back Yard Burgers, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2006

/s/ Lattimore M. Michael
-------------------------------

Lattimore M. Michael
Chief Executive Officer
121 STAT. 232 PUBLIC LAW 110–40—JUNE 29, 2007

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 57:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 110–19 (Comm. on Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):

Jan. 17, considered and passed House.

June 12, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 110–40

110th Congress

An Act

To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 1936, pertaining to the Virgin

Islands.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN LAWS PERTAINING TO THE VIRGIN

ISLANDS.

(a) REPEAL.—Sections 1 through 6 of the Act of May 26, 1936

(Chapter 450; 49 Stat. 1372–1373; 48 U.S.C. 1401–1401e) are

repealed.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall be deemed to have

taken effect on July 22, 1954.

Approved June 29, 2007.

48 USC 1401

note.

June 29, 2007

[H.R. 57]
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Kenney, James (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 1:38 PM

To: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Subject: FW: Exemption Request, FAA-2012-0897

Jake,

This should close out the request from Gus Calderon.

Best regards,

Jim Kenney

From: Gus Calderon [mailto:jetcruise@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 4:12 AM 

To: Kenney, James (FAA) 

Subject: Re: Exemption Request, FAA-2012-0897 

Hello Jim, 

I would like to cancel my request for a previously submitted petition for exemption; docket ID: FAA-2012-0897. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Best regards, 

Gus Calderon 

www.airspaceconsulting.com

760-519-1941 

-----Original Message----- 

From: James.Kenney@faa.gov 

Sent: Jul 1, 2015 12:13 PM 

To: Jetcruise@earthlink.net, Gus@airspaceconsulting.com 

Subject: Exemption Request, FAA-2012-0897 

Gus,

  

Thanks for taking the time to speak with me today.  I am pleased that you were able to successfully navigate the 333

exemption process.

  

As we discussed, we will be pleased to cancel your request for exemption, FAA‐2012‐0897 provided you send me a brief

email requesting that the exemption be cancelled.   

  

Please feel free to contact me if you have questions in the future (email is best as I travel frequently).

  

Best regards,

  

Jim Kenney

Aviation Safety Inspector
2

UAS Integration Office

Washington DC

  

202‐267‐8218

James.kenney@faa.gov
#### § 618.8360 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                   QUIPP, INC.

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

          REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
                        OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         I, Michael S. Kady, Chief Executive Officer of Quipp, Inc., a Florida
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:

         (1)      The Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
                  ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                      * * *



MICHAEL S. KADY
---------------
Michael S. Kady
Chief Executive Officer

Date:    May 13, 2005