alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM ZEON CORPORATION'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000796513
<NAME> ZEON CORPORATION
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                         235,621
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  354,960
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,476)
<INVENTORY>                                    261,388
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               885,210
<PP&E>                                         364,120
<DEPRECIATION>                               (246,380)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,046,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          193,799
<BONDS>                                         26,279
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,852
<OTHER-SE>                                     826,225
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,046,303
<SALES>                                        645,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               645,813
<CGS>                                          436,250
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  244,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,608)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,524)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,524)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,524)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
Tools for Schools Training

1. Have you participated in live web training before? Yes No 2. Rate y our PRI OR knowledge of the content of the training. 3. The information provided was useful. 4. The activities were useful and enhanced m y learning . 5. The amount of time spent on EACH component of the training was adequate. 6. If you felt that the amount of time devoted to any component was not sufficient or was excessive, please identify it in the space below and provide and an y other comme nts that would help us improve this lesson. 

### Evaluation of the meeting environment and the trainers 7. Iwas able to access the Classroom without difficulty .8. The length of the entire session was about right.

9. Iprefer web - based training, rath er than classroom - based training with a live trainer. 10. Iprefer classroom - based training with a live trainer. 11. The trainers were knowledgeable about the subject matter. 12. The materials aided my learning.

13. Rate y our knowledge of the content of the training after completing the course. 14. Please provide an y other comments or suggestions y ou have about how this and future training courses may be improved.
#### HUNT’S LESSEE *v.*McHENRY AND WILLIAMS.

County surveyor — private surveys — section lines — evidence.

By our statute no re-survey, made after the first of June, 1831, except made by the county surveyor or his deputy, can be received as evidence, unless made by mutual agreement in writing, signed by the parties.

If the plat of survey is rejected, the surveyor will not be permitted to relate orally his doings while surveying.

Where government land has been run into sections, and patented by the number, the patent covers the land actually surveyed, whether the lines were run straight according to the law or not.

The question in such cases is, where was the line originally run, not where ought it to have been run?

Ejectment to settle the boundary between sections nineteen and twenty.

*Starr*for the plaintiff

offered a plat of a survey of the line.

*King*

objected that it was not signed by the parties under the provisions of the statute, or made by the county surveyor.

Wright, J.

The twelfth section of the act, creating the office of county surveyor and defining his duties, (29 *O. L.*401) provides that no re-survey thereafter made by any person, except the county surveyor or his deputy, shall be considered as *legal testimony in any court of law or equity*in this state, except such surveys are made by mutual consent, in writing, and *signed by the parties.*This survey was not made by the county surveyor or by his deputy, nor is it *600signed by the parties. We have no discretion on the subject, but are prohibited from considering such surveys legal evidence. It must be rejected.

*Starr*

then called the surveyor, who was proceeding to testify that he run the line, etc. but was stopped by the court.

*Starr*

asked him if a straight line were run from one corner to the other, whether it would fall so as to include any of the defendants’ possessions.

*King*

objected, the line was actually run by the government, and the inquiry is, where that line is.

*Starr.*

The line was actually run by the government, but the law required the line to be run straight.

*Starr*

then consented to a verdict for the defendants.

Wright, J.

If this land was originally surveyed you can prove where the lines of such survey are, and how they affect the possession of the parties, but you cannot prove the survey orally, which reduced to writing, we have just rejected.

The witness then said he found the corners of the section, but no line.

Wright, J.

Is it conceded that the government did in fact run the line from these corners ?

Wright, J.

If the line was actually run, before the patent, the patent is for the section *surveyed.*Where was the line run *1*is the question, not where it ought to have run. If the witness can tell where the line that was run is, he can do so; but if his knowledge depend upon a re-survey and calculations, he cannot testify to that. Whether the line originally run was in accordance with the law or not, is a question between the government and its officer. The section actually run out is patented by its number — nothing else is patented — there are no calls in the patent for corners or lines.
EXHIBIT 31.1

    CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Bolink, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chell Group
Corporation. ("Chell");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Chell
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. As the sole certifying officer I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Chell and have:

      a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to Chell, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

      b. evaluated the effectiveness of Chell's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation;

      c. disclosed in this report any change in Chell's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during Chell's most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, Chell's internal control over financial reporting;

5. As the sole certifying officer I have disclosed, based on my most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Chell's auditors and
the audit committee of Chell's board of directors:

      a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect Chell's ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial information; and

      b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in Chell's internal control over
      financial reporting.

DATE: November 30 2004


                                       By:         /s/ David Bolink
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                     DAVID BOLINK
                                                CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
                                                  CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of Thionville Surveying Company, Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, Thionville Surveying Company, Inc., 5440 Pepsi St, Harahan, LA 70123, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals, and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov*. Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                     

*http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​*.                     

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of Thionville Surveying Company, Inc., as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on June 25, 2008. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for June 2011. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randall Breaux, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060. 

      ( print page 6298)    
Dated: January 29, 2009. 

Ira S. Reese, 

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. E9-2505 Filed 2-5-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
Model se 744 

1 JUL 99 

Origina!: Supplier or GSA

1st Copy: ACC 

2nd Copy: Agency

3rd Copy: ACC-lnf. Rec. & lnsp. 

4th Copy: Agency-Inf. Rec.& lnsp. 

5th Copy: ASG lnf. Rec. & lnsp. 

PRIFAS 

DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION : 

Agen 

0400000 

Purchase Order Number

2130440307 

SUPPLIER

Date

28-0ct-20 

Options for Dispatch Processing O Fax O Telephone

Name of Supplier: 

Address: 

NORTH SIGHT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

PO BOX 51148 

Toa Baja PR 00950 

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO 

General Services Administration

Agency

PO Box 195568 San Juan PR 00919-5568 

Address

OBLIGATION AND PURCHASE ORDER

Request No.

20-193-DSP-PPR

[x] Purchases and Supplies

[ ] Transportation Area

[ ] Printing

[ ] Art

 Warehouse

Inventory Agency Number

ITotal Amount Supplier Code

$1,347,500.00 660395496 SE IG 

Supplier Agency

FUND AGEN 

O Mail Delivery Date: 2 to 4 weeks

DELIVER TO: INVOICE TO: 

!Agenc (Agency: Puerto Rico Police Bureau y: Puerto Rico Police Bureau

Address: Communications Division

601 F.D. Roosevelt Ave, Headquarters

Hato Rey, PR 00936-8166 

Delivery Method: 

Address: PO Box 70166 

San Juan, PR00936-8166 

Shipment Terms: 

ARTICLES (if more space needed, use another sheet) For GSA Use 

Current Catalogue Contract Price per Total Property LN Acct. Fund Org. Prog. Asig Year 

Federal Cont. Description Number Type of 

1 E5250 252 040000 782 2019 

For Agency or GSA Use

I request dispatch of the articles or services indicated and certify that this order 

has been issued pursuant to the applicable laws and regulations.

28-Oct-20

Date

Dual-Band portable radios 500 $2,695.00 

antenna, two batteries, microphone

charge holder (Belt Clip) with 

Brand: Motorola 

Model: APX/700/800 Model / 2.5 

3 year Warranty

In compliance with Specifications

UEA-20-099 

20-193-DSP-PPR Subtotal 

I certify the existence of funds for 

payment of the Purchase order 

requested.

Department of the Treasury or GSA

Approved by: 

-

Signature

Signature 

10/28/2020 ·Director of Acquisitions Program

Date Telephone Date Títle

Property Quantity Dispatched

$1,347,500.00 

$1,347,500.00

j For GSA Use

Dispatched by: 

Signature

Title

759-7676 Date Telephone

Telephone

Number Unit Units Unit

Number

759-7676

Telephone

 [Signature]

Evelyn Melia Muñiz [Signature]

Juan P. Figueroa Colón

Purchasing Agent or Cert. Official

[Signature]

Preservation Period: Six years or intervention by the Comptroller, whichever comes first.

[ ]

Certified to be a true and exact translation from the source text in Spanish to the target language English. 

24/JANUARY/2023 ♦ Pura Reyes Gilestra-ATA # 244688/NAJIT # 3449 ♦ Translations & More: 787-637-4906

Price

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23351-2 Filed:01/25/23 Entered:01/25/23 15:38:55 Desc:

Exhibit B - Obligation and Purchase Order Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 741

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 741 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 741.216 Flood insurance.

Any credit union which is insured pursuant to title II of the Act shall adhere to the requirements stated in part 760 of this chapter.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

As representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et. al.

Debtor

____________________________________________

LUIS A. RIVERA SIACA

Movant

v.

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO 

As representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et. al. 

Debtor

PROMESA Title III

No. 17-03283-LTS

(Jointly administered)

Re: ECF No. 22166

Department of Education of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

MOTION SUBMITTING CERTIFIED TRANSLATIONS AND FOR ENTRY OF 

ORDER

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

COMES NOW, Luis A. Rivera Siaca (“Rivera Siaca”), through his undersigned counsel, and 

respectfully states and requests: 

1. On September 12, 2022, Rivera Siaca filed a Motion for Leave to Comply with Order

(Docket No. 22166) requesting that an order be entered accepting Rivera Siaca’s reply to the 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22338 Filed:09/21/22 Entered:09/21/22 11:42:19 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico’s (the “Commonwealth”) response filed at Docket No. 21706 and 

that Rivera Siaca be granted until September 28, 2022, to file a certified English translation of Exhibit 

A to the Motion to Comply with Payment of Administrative Rent (Docket No. 21408) and Exhibit B 

of the Response to Debtor’s Objection to Motion to Comply with Payment of Administrative Rent

(Docket No. 21706). 

2. Rivera Siaca is forwarding herewith the Lease Agreement entered on January 15, 2021 

between the Department of Education of Puerto Rico and Rivera Siaca accompanied by a certified 

translation to the English language thereof (Exhibit A) and the Certification of the Lease Agreement 

issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico also accompanied by 

its certified translation to the English language (Exhibit B). 

WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that the attached documents and their certified 

translations to the English language be directed to be made part of the record, as set forth in the 

attached proposed order.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: I hereby certify that on this same date, I electronically filed 

the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of 

such filing to all CM/ECF participants.

San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 21st of September 2022

s/ CHARLES A. CUPRILL-HERNANDEZ

USDC-PR 114312

Charles A. Cuprill, P.S.C. Law Offices

Attorney for Luis A. Rivera Siaca

356 Fortaleza Street, Second Floor

San Juan, PR 00901

Tel.: 787-977-0515

Fax: 787-977-0518

E-Mail: ccuprill@cuprill.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22338 Filed:09/21/22 Entered:09/21/22 11:42:19 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 747

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 747.603 Prevailing party.

An eligible applicant may be a “prevailing party” if the applicant wins an action after a full hearing or trial on the merits, if a settlement of the proceeding was effected on terms favorable to it, or if the proceeding against it has been dismissed. In appropriate situations an applicant may also have prevailed if the outcome of the proceeding has substantially vindicated the applicant's position on the significant substantive matters at issue, even though the applicant has not totally avoided adverse final action.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 06/25/2014

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: 111d Discussion Call with the State of Colorado held on 06/16/2014

SUMMARY: 

EPA Region 8 staff discussed various questions on the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power 

Plants with the State of Colorado on 06/16/2014. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was 

proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA Region 8: Laura Farris, Mark Komp

Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment: Dena Wojtach, Garry Kaufman, Kirsten King, 

and Curtis Taipale

ATTACHMENTS

Discussion Questions
42677.

#### BELT v. GEORGIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY.

Submitted April 3, 1967

Decided April 7, 1967.

Charles Belt, *pro se.*

*John M. Hancock, Jr.,*for appellee.

Felton, Chief Judge.

Since the action was instituted subse*546quently to the maturity date of the note, the note was not, at that time, a conditional contract, even if it contained stipulations providing for acceleration of maturity, at the holder’s option and optional attorney’s fees upon certain other conditions, as is contended by appellant. Cf. *Hartsfield Co. No. 3 v. Williams,*114 Ga. App. 547, 548 (2) (151 SE2d 908) and cit.

The defendant’s mere unsworn denial of the allegations of Paragraph 2 as pleaded is evasive, constitutes neither a denial of the paragraph nor an issuable defense to the suit upon the promissory note, and is not amendable. *Chastain v. Consolidated Credit Corp.,*113 Ga. App. 225, 228 (2, 3) (147 SE2d 807) and cit.; *Keith v. Streicher Mfg. Co.,*108 Ga. App. 183 (2) (132 SE2d 559) and cit.; *Watson v. Davis,*97 Ga. App. 378, 380 (5) (103 SE2d 182); *Peed v. Rowe,*30 Ga. App. 626 (118 SE 475). The answer with regard to notice of attorney’s fees does not deny the receipt of the notice, but merely claims that *Code Ann.*§ 20-506 is a “non-existent” section—an allegation the error of which is readily apparent from reference to that annotated Code section (Ga. L. 1957, p. 264). Neither does the answer raise the issue of mutual departure from the original terms of the contract, which is argued for the first time here. The installment loan ledger which purportedly evidences this novation, although appearing in the record, is neither referred to in the petition nor marked as an exhibit.

No issuable defense having been filed under oath or affirmation, the court did not err in striking the defendant’s answer and rendering judgment without the verdict of a jury for the plaintiff in this civil case founded on the unconditional contract. See Constitution of Georgia, Art. VI, Sec. IV, Par. VII *(Code Ann.*§ 2-3907); *Code*§ 24-3355 (Superior Court Rule 55); *Code Ann.*§ 110-401 (Ga. L. 1962, pp. 687, 688), superseding repealed § 110-406 (Ga. L. 1946, pp. 761, 777; Ga. L. 1953, Nov. Sess., pp. 440, 451); and cases cited hereinabove.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall and Eberhardt, J.J., concur.*