alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 380.3 Treatment of personal service agreements. ( a ) For the purposes of this section, the term “personal service agreement” means a written agreement between an employee and a covered financial company or a bridge financial company setting forth the terms of employment. This term also includes an agreement between any group or class of employees and a covered financial company, or a bridge financial company, including, without limitation, a collective bargaining agreement.
( b ) ( 1 ) If before repudiation or disaffirmance of a personal service agreement, the Corporation as receiver of a covered financial company, or a bridge financial company accepts performance of services rendered under such agreement, then: ( i ) The terms and conditions of such agreement shall apply to the performance of such services; and
( ii ) Any payments for the services accepted by the Corporation as receiver shall be treated as an administrative expense of the receiver.
( 2 ) If a bridge financial company accepts performance of services rendered under such agreement, then the terms and conditions of such agreement shall apply to the performance of such services.
( c ) No party acquiring a covered financial company or any operational unit, subsidiary or assets thereof from the Corporation as receiver or from any bridge financial company shall be bound by a personal service agreement unless the acquiring party expressly assumes the personal service agreement.
( d ) The acceptance by the Corporation as receiver for a covered financial company, or by any bridge financial company or the Corporation as receiver for a bridge financial company of services subject to a personal service agreement shall not limit or impair the authority of the receiver to disaffirm or repudiate any personal service agreement in the manner provided for the disaffirmance or repudiation of any agreement under 12 U.S.C. 5390(c).
( e ) Paragraph (b) of this section shall not apply to any personal service agreement with any senior executive or director of the covered financial company or covered subsidiary, nor shall it in any way limit or impair the ability of the receiver to recover compensation from any senior executive or director of a covered financial company under 12 U.S.C. 5390 and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
[76 FR 41640, July 15, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
REXALL SUNDOWN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 (THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS).
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000  
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR    
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                          13,450
<SECURITIES>                                     7,988
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,410<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,179
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,178
<PP&E>                                          24,078<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,045
<BONDS>                                            105<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           307
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,095
<SALES>                                        187,844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,844
<CGS>                                           71,682
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                86,673
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,091
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,798
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,293
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,293
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NET OF ALLOWANCE.
<F2>NET OF DEPRECIATION.
<F3>INCLUDES LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

# AGENCY:

International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee (ETTAC) will hold a plenary meeting on October 29, 2009 at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, in Room 3407. The ETTAC will discuss environmental goods and services trade liberalization efforts in the World Trade Organization, United Nations climate negotiations in Copenhagen, and other administrative items. This is the first time this ETTAC will meet since its re-chartering in September 2009. The meeting is open to the public and time will be permitted for public comment.

Written comments concerning ETTAC affairs are welcome anytime before or after the meeting. Minutes will be available within 30 days of this meeting.

The ETTAC is mandated by Public Law 103-392. It was created to advise the U.S. government on environmental trade policies and programs, and to help it to focus its resources on increasing the exports of the U.S. environmental industry. ETTAC operates as an advisory committee to the Secretary of Commerce and the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee (TPCC). ETTAC was originally chartered in May of 1994. It was most recently re-chartered until September 2010.

# DATES:

October 29, 2009.

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 3 p.m.                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        For further information phone Ellen Bohon, Office of Energy and Environmental Technologies Industries (OEEI), International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce at (202) 482-0359 or via e-mail at:                         *Ellen.bohon@mail.doc.gov*. This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to OEEI at (202) 482-5225.                    

Cheryl McQueen,

Acting Director, Office of Energy and Environmental Industries, U.S. Department of Commerce.

[FR Doc. E9-25125 Filed 10-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
#### HARPER *v.*ASHTABULA COUNTY.

Error — signing the records — assessment of damages — small errors.

The omission of the presiding judge to sign the record, the want of *form*in. the record,.or *oí*a bill of particulars, me too small matters to be noticed on error.

If the defendant lias been defaulted for not answering in court, the damages may be thereon assessed, by order of the court.

The court may assess the damages on a default without a jury — the record does not show the-particular facts proven, and if U show the plaintiff has sustained damages to $120, judgment may follow.

Error. The county brought assumpsit against Harper in the Common Pleas for money had and received. A declaration was filed the first vacation after the writ. No *rule for plea*was entered, but at the third term the defendant was called and defaulted, and it being shown and proven that the plaintiffs have sustained damages in the premises in the sum of $120,’ &c. therefore, there was judgment for that sum and costs.

*Harper,*

in person, assigned the following errors:

1. That the-record is not signed by the-president judge or the presiding associate judge.

2. The record is not such as is required by law.

3. That no bills'”’of particulars were exhibited to the court, or entered of record.

*7094. No issue was joined, and it does not appear what facts were tried by the court.

5. No jury was called to assess the damages.

6. No damages were assessed, and it does not appear on what the court grounded its judgment.

*P.*Hitchcock, contra.

Wright, J.

To the three first causes assigned for error, it is sufficient to apply the maxim de minimis lex non curat.

The fourth and fifth causes I will consider together. There was a default regularly taken for the non appearance of the defendant at the third term, and the defendant, who now complains, had omitted to plead or tender an issue. In cases of default, the court is by law expressly required to assess the damages, unless *either party*shall require a jury: (29 *O. L.*73.) In this case neither party did require a jury, and the court was in the performance of its legal functions in assessing the damages. That the record does not show what particular facts were tried, is no objection. The facts very seldom form a part of the record. Upon non assumpsit, for instance, the apparent issue contests the promise, yet under it, payment, accord, a release, &c. may in fact be proven — and when they are proven, they form no part of the record.

6. From the record it appears that *‘it was shown and proven that the plaintiffs have sustained damages in the premises in the sum of*$> 120.’ This seems to lay a foundation for a judgment. If the objection be the omission to say it was shown *‘to the-court.1*It is answered by the inquiry, to whom else could a fact in court he shown, so as to place it on the record? Admit the entries untechnical, yet they are *substantially good.*

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CAREERENGINE
NETWORK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES' CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)
AND CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE INTERIM
PERIOD  ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        1,092,172
<SECURITIES>                                  3,429,610
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                       71,623,487
<DEPRECIATION>                                1,076,689
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               78,628,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                      72,750,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        674,960
<OTHER-SE>                                      558,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 78,628,127
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              3,164,997
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 2,246,125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,628,664
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (709,792)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     16,020
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (725,812)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (725,812)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.13)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 8.1
 List of Significant Subsidiaries:
 Percentage ofName
    
    ownership
    
    Registered office
    
    ActivityItalsofa Bahia Ltd
    
    
    97.99
    
    
    Bahia, Brazil
    
    
    (1
    )Minuano Nordeste S.A.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Pojuca, Brazil
    
    
    (1
    )Italsofa Shanghai Ltd
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Shanghai, China
    
    
    (1
    )Softaly Shanghai Ltd
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Shanghai, China
    
    
    (1
    )Italsofa Romania
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Baia Mare, Romania
    
    
    (1
    )Natco S.p.A.
    
    
    99.99
    
    
    Bari, Italy
    
    
    (2
    )I.M.P.E. S.p.A.
    
    
    90.83
    
    
    Qualiano, Italy
    
    
    (3
    )Nacon S.p.A.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Bari, Italy
    
    
    (4
    )Lagene S.r.l.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Bari, Italy
    
    
    (4
    )Natuzzi Americas Inc.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    High Point, NC, USA
    
    
    (4
    )Natuzzi Iberica S.A.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Madrid, Spain
    
    
    (4
    )Natuzzi Switzerland AG
    
    
    97.00
    
    
    Kaltbrunn, Switzerland
    
    
    (4
    )Natuzzi Nordic
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Copenaghen, Denmark
    
    
    (4
    )Natuzzi Benelux S.A.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Geel, Belgium
    
    
    (4
    )Natuzzi Germany Gmbh
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Dusseldorf, Germany
    
    
    (4
    )Natuzzi Sweden AB
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Stockholm, Sweden
    
    
    (4
    )Natuzzi Japan KK
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Tokyo, Japan
    
    
    (4
    )Natuzzi Services Limited
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    London, UK
    
    
    (4
    )La Galleria Limited
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    London, UK
    
    
    (7
    )Natuzzi Netherlands Holding
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Amsterdam, Holland
    
    
    (5
    )Natuzzi United Kingdom Limited
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    London, UK
    
    
    (7
    )Natuzzi Trade Service S.r.l.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Bari, Italy
    
    
    (6
    )Kingdom of Leather Limited
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    London, UK
    
    
    (7
    )Italholding S.r.l.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Bari, Italy
    
    
    (5
    )
 
 (1)
    
    Manufacture and distribution(2)
    
    Intragroup leather dyeing and finishing(3)
    
    Production and distribution of polyurethane foam(4)
    
    Distribution(5)
    
    Investment holding(6)
    
    Transportation services(7)
    
    Dormant
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                  EXHIBIT 21.01
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



                                                       PLACE OF
           SUBSIDIARY                                  INCORPORATION

  GREENFIELD SEED COMPANY                               USA
  D&PL INVESTING CORP.                                  USA
  TURK DELTAPINE, INC.                                  USA
  DELTA AND PINE LAND INTERNATIONAL, LTD                VIRGIN ISLANDS
  DELTAPINE AUSTRALIA, PTY., LTD.                       AUSTRALIA
  DELTA PINE DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V.                    MEXICO
  ATLED CORPORATION                                     USA
  D&PL CHINA, INC.                                      USA
  DELTAPINE PARAGUAY, INC.                              USA
  D&PL TECHNOLOGY CORP.                                 USA
  D&PL INVESTMENTS, INC.                                USA
  D&PL SOUTH AFRICA, INC.                               USA
  D&M INTERNATIONAL LLC                                 USA
  D&M PARTNERS                                          USA
  D&PL ARGENTINA, INC.                                  USA
  D&PL CHINA PTE, LTD.                                  SINGAPORE
  D&PL MEXICO, INC.                                     USA
  PAYMASTER TECHNOLOGY CORP.                            USA
  SURE GROW SEED, INC.                                  USA
  ELLIS BROTHERS SEED, INC.                             USA
  ARIZONA PROCESSING, INC.                              USA
  MISSISSIPPI SEED, INC.                                USA
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12

- 20474

EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY SERVICES, INC., OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants

- Appellants

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10

- CV

- 2258

Before JOLLY and SOUTHWICK , Circuit Judges

. *
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge : * *
Following oral argument, this action was held in abeyance while the
Texas Supreme Court considered certified question s from th is Court in a

similar case, In re Deepwater Horizon

, No. 13

- 0670

. The Texas Supreme Court

* Judge DeM oss, the third judge on the panel that originally heard this case, retired before this decision was issued. C onsequently, this decision and opinion is rendered by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c) and (d).

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 15, 2015
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 12-20474 Document: 00513194396 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/15/2015No. 12

- 20474

2 has now answered. See In re Deepwater Horizon, Relator

, --- S.W. 3d

--- , 58 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 330 (Tex. 2015). Among other things, the Texas Supreme

Court’s answer provides clarification regarding the court’s previous holding in
Evanston Insurance Co. v. ATOFINA Petrochemicals, Inc. , 256 S.W.3d 660
(Tex. 2008), a case that has be en at the center of this dispute.
When deciding this case, the district court did not have the benefit of the
Texas Supreme Court’s answer to the certified questions posed in In re
Deepwater Horizon

. Accordingly, we VACATE the district court’s judgment

, and REMAND this case for further consideration in the light of the answer
given by the Texas Supreme Court.
VACATED, and REMANDED. Case: 12-20474 Document: 00513194396 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/15/2015
EXHIBIT B-1 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:20008-4 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 19:58:04 Desc:

Exhibit B-1 Page 1 of 4
Certified to be a correct and true translation from the source text in Spanish to the target language English.

20/DECEMBER/2021 - Andreea I. Boscor ATA-certified Spanish-English #525556

By Targem Translations Inc.

September 13, 2021

Jacqueline Rosado Colón

Urb. Sombras del Real

901 Calle El Caobo

Coto Laurel P.R. 00780

Tel. 787-615-6793

Claim No. 174471

Email: jackr_pirita33@yahoo.com

Case No. 17-BK-03283-LTS

Claim and grounds on which I am entitled to bring a claim during the period in which we 

belonged to the government when working for the Puerto Rico Telephone Company from 

12/05/1988. Claim for money owed for laws that were passed which apply to me for my years 

of service as a Service Representative III for the PRTC of the Commonwealth of PR. The 

claim includes: Overtime worked, bonuses, vacations, increase in regular hours/salary and 

the interest acquired under the July 1995 – Romerazo Act, Titled PROMESA Law. As well as 

other laws that apply to me. The corresponding compensation was not granted to me. I thank 

you for your attention on this matter.

[Signature]

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:20008-4 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 19:58:04 Desc:

Exhibit B-1 Page 2 of 4
Certified to be a correct and true translation from the source text in Spanish to the target language English.

20/DECEMBER/2021 - Andreea I. Boscor ATA-certified Spanish-English #525556

By Targem Translations Inc.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:20008-4 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 19:58:04 Desc:

Exhibit B-1 Page 3 of 4
TRANSLATOR’S CERTIFICATE OF TRANSLATION

Translation from: Spanish (Puerto Rico) into English (US)

TARGEM Translations Inc.

I, Andreea I. Boscor, ATA-certified Spanish-English #525556, acting as translator at TARGEM Translations Inc., a 

NEW YORK City corporation, with its principal office at 185 Clymer Street, Brooklyn, NY, 11211, USA, certify that:

the English translated document is a true and accurate translation of the original Spanish and has been 

translated to the best of my knowledge.

Original Document Name: Claim No. 178406

 

Signed this 20th day of December, 2021 

__________________________ 

 Andreea I. Boscor

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:20008-4 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 19:58:04 Desc:

Exhibit B-1 Page 4 of 4
#### §§ 717.80-717.81 [Reserved]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3218

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify that willful failure 

to depart from the United States by an alien against whom a final 

order of removal is outstanding is a continuing criminal offense, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2003

Mr. FLAKE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify 

that willful failure to depart from the United States 

by an alien against whom a final order of removal is 

outstanding is a continuing criminal offense, and for 

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Failure to Depart 

5 Act’’. 
2

•HR 3218 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PENALTIES RELATED TO REMOVAL. 

2 Section 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

3 (8 U.S.C. 1253) is amended—

4 (1) in subsection (a)—

5 (A) by amending paragraph (1)(A) to read 

6 as follows: 

7 ‘‘(A) will fully remain in the United States 

8 on or after the date that is 90 days after the 

9 date of the final order of removal under admin10 istrative processes, or if judicial review is had, 

11 90 days after the date of the final order of the 

12 court,’’; and 

13 (B) by striking paragraph (3); and 

14 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘not more 

15 than $1,000’’ and inserting ‘‘under title 18, United 

16 States Code,’’.

Æ
#### § 163.39 [Reserved]