alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

89–11 2000

106th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 106–307

CONTINUATION OF SUDAN EMERGENCY

MESSAGE

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

A REPORT ON DEVELOPMENTS CONCERNING THE NATIONAL

EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO SUDAN THAT WAS DECLARED

IN EXECUTIVE ORDER 13067 OF NOVEMBER 3, 1997, AND MATTERS RELATING TO THE MEASURES IN THAT ORDER, WHICH

MUST BE CONTINUED FOR ANOTHER YEAR, PURSUANT TO 50

U.S.C. 1641(c).

NOVEMBER 1, 2000.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the

Committee on International Relations and ordered to be printed

(1)

To the Congress of the United States:

Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C.

1622(d)) provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, prior to the anniversary date of its declaration, the

President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the

Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. In accordance with this provision,

I have sent the enclosed notice, stating that the Sudan emergency

is to continue in effect beyond November 3, 2000, to the Federal

Register for publication.

The crisis between the United States and Sudan that led to the

declaration on November 3, 1997, of a national emergency has not

been resolved. The Government of Sudan has continued its activities hostile to United States interests. Such Sudanese actions and

policies pose a continuing unusual and extraordinary threat to the

national security and foreign policy of the United States. For these

reasons, I have determined that it is necessary to maintain in force

the broad authorities necessary to apply economic pressure on the

Government of Sudan.

WILLIAM J. CLINTON.

THE WHITE HOUSE, October 31, 2000.

(3)

NOTICE

CONTINUATION OF SUDAN EMERGENCY

On November 3, 1997, by Executive Order 13067, I declared a

national emergency to deal with the unusual and extraordinary

threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United

States constituted by the actions and policies of the Government of

Sudan. By Executive Order 13067, I imposed trade sanctions on

Sudan and blocked Sudanese government assets. Because the Government of Sudan has continued its activities hostile to United

States interests, the national emergency declared on November 3,

1997, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that

emergency must continue in effect beyond November 3, 2000.

Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency for 1 year with respect to Sudan.

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.

WILLIAM J. CLINTON.

THE WHITE HOUSE, October 31, 2000.

Æ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LESYA SHUNEVYCH,

Petitioner,

v.

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER

, Acting

Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 17

- 72951

Agency No. A076

- 667

- 235

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 27, 2018 **

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Lesya Shunevych, a native and citizen of Ukraine, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigratio n Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of her motion to reopen removal

proceedings conducted in absentia in order to apply for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# F ILED

DEC 3 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review f or an abuse of discretion the

denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder

, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir.

2014 ). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Shunevych’s motion to

reopen as untimely where she failed to establish prima facie eligibility for relief.

See Agonafer v. Sessions , 859 F.3d 1198, 1204 (9th C ir. 2018) (stating

requirements for granting motion to reopen); Guo v. Sessions , 897 F.3d 1208, 1213

(9th Cir. 2018) (stating standards for asylum and wi thholding of removal) ; Aden v.

Holder , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009) (stating standard for CAT relief)

.

Further, Shunevych has not shown that the BIA denied her due process by

failing to consider relevant evidence. See Larita

- Martinez v. INS , 220 F.3d 1092,

1095

- 96 (9th Cir. 2000) (holding that petitioner must overcome presumption that

BIA considered all the relevant evidence).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, David Bolink, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-Q  of  Chell  Group
Corporation. ("Chell");

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of Chell
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  As the  sole  certifying  officer  I am  responsible  for  establishing  and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Chell and have:

      a.  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
      disclosure  controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision,
      to ensure  that  material  information  relating to Chell,  including  its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

      b.  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  Chell's  disclosure   controls  and
      procedures and presented in this quarterly  report our  conclusions  about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation;

      c.  disclosed in this report any change in Chell's  internal  control over
      financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  Chell's  most recent  fiscal
      quarter  that  has  materially  affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to
      materially affect, Chell's internal control over financial reporting;

5. As the sole  certifying  officer I have  disclosed,  based on my most  recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Chell's auditors and
the audit committee of Chell's board of directors:

      a. all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
      operation  of  internal   control  over  financial   reporting  which  are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect Chell's ability to record,  process,
      summarize and report financial information; and

      b. any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees who have a  significant  role in Chell's  internal  control over
      financial reporting.

DATE: November 30 2004


                                       By:       /s/ David Bolink
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                  DAVID BOLINK
                                            CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
# Službeni list C 464A/17.

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 464A |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 64.17. studenoga 2021. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 464A

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 64.17. studenoga 2021.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | Ispravci |
| 2021/C 464 A/01 | Ispravak Glavne uprave za istraživanje i inovacije – Objava slobodnog radnog mjesta glavnog savjetnika – predsjednika Odbora Europskog vijeća za inovacije (Privremeno osoblje – razred AD 14) – COM/2021/10408 ( SL C 432 A, 26.10.2021. ) | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

Ispravci

2021/C 464 A/01

Ispravak Glavne uprave za istraživanje i inovacije – Objava slobodnog radnog mjesta glavnog savjetnika – predsjednika Odbora Europskog vijeća za inovacije (Privremeno osoblje – razred AD 14) – COM/2021/10408 ( SL C 432 A, 26.10.2021. )

( SL C 432 A, 26.10.2021. )

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

Ispravci

| 17.11.2021 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CA 464/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2021

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CA 464/1

---

Ispravak Glavne uprave za istraživanje i inovacije – Objava slobodnog radnog mjesta glavnog savjetnika – predsjednika Odbora Europskog vijeća za inovacije

(Privremeno osoblje – razred AD 14)

COM/2021/10408

(
  Službeni list Europske unije C 432 A od 26. listopada 2021.
  )

(2021/C 464 A/01)

Na stranici 5., pod „Rok za prijavu”, prvi odlomak:

| umjesto: | „Rok za prijavu istječe 26. studenoga 2021. u 12 sati (podne) prema briselskom vremenu, nakon čega se više neće biti moguće prijaviti.”; |
| --- | --- |

umjesto:

„Rok za prijavu istječe 26. studenoga 2021. u 12 sati (podne) prema briselskom vremenu, nakon čega se više neće biti moguće prijaviti.”;

| treba stajati: | „Rok za prijavu istječe 17. prosinca 2021. u 12 sati (podne) prema briselskom vremenu, nakon čega se više neće biti moguće prijaviti.”. |
| --- | --- |

treba stajati:

treba stajati:

„Rok za prijavu istječe 17. prosinca 2021. u 12 sati (podne) prema briselskom vremenu, nakon čega se više neće biti moguće prijaviti.”.

---
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Trans World Entertainment Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending May 1, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Robert J. Higgins,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John J. Sullivan,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                      |  |                               | 
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | 
|/s/ Robert J. Higgins                 |  | /s/
 John J. Sullivan         | 
|                                      |  |                               | 
|Robert J. Higgins                     |  | John J. Sullivan              | 
|Chairman and Chief
 Executive Officer |  | Executive Vice President
 and | 
|                                      |  | Chief Financial Officer       | 
|June 10,
 2010                        |  | June 10,
 2010                | 

---
Exhibit E

Detail of Expenses by Expense Category

EXHIBIT E: ZC EXPENSES INCURRED BY CATEGORY

Professional Date Category Description Amount 

Total Expenses $ -

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23812-5 Filed:03/15/23 Entered:03/15/23 18:05:23 Desc:

Exhibit E Page 1 of 1
#### JACOB WOLF *v.*FRANCES M. WOLF.

Divorce — suspicion of unfairness — collusion.

Where the case disclosed is a suspicious one, or it appear that any thing has been kept back, a divorce will not be decreed.

Where there is collusion between the parties a divorce will not be decreed.

Divorce. Cause wilful absence more than three years. The defendant in her answer denied that she left the complainant’s house, but alleged that she attended to her duties, until at his request she left him, in'order that he might -get a wife more suited to his character. As the cause was called on to hearing, leave was asked and obtained by the defendant, to withdraw her answer.

Several witnesses were examined by the plaintiff.

*Abbot Goddard*said he was present when the parties separated. The defendant said she would not live'with-him another day; she did not love him when she married him, but did not know but she should. He said he-would not pay her board, but if she returned she would find a friend in J. Wolf.

*William*Wolf.J (son of the plaintiff.) The defendant left four years ago next August, because she did not attend to her duty. They lived together about three months after the marriage.

*Emily Sullivan*said she lived at Wolf’s after the marriage. Mrs. Wolf left of her own accord. She spent *one*night, or perhaps *two*nights with her husband *alone.*Sometimes she was at meeting and sometimes she was elsewhere. They did not enjoy life well. He did not like her going to meeting, and spoke to her about it. She ■said she would come and go when she pleased. She did not attend to the domestic concerns. They were married in a few weeks after their first acquaintance. . She went to Mrs. James’ her relative, and has been there ever since.

*Mrs.*Huston, was sent to the defendant by the plaintiff to tell her that he wanted an interview, that he wanted to see her. She said he was an old Wolf, and might stay in his den — he was an old rascal —she said she did not love him when she married him, but did not know but she might, and she would have nothing to do with him. She supposed he was rich and pious, but found he was neither.

*Mrs. Smith*said the defendant never complained of any ill treatment. She said she could not live with him and save her soul, which was her *all.*

By the Court.

We find it impossible to shake off the suspicion, that the true state of this case is not disclosed to us. The conduct of the parties, the withdrawal of the answer, the matter stated in it, the manner of the separation, and the subsequent acts and declara*244tions, excite suspicion. It is incredible, that the relation of man ahd wife should have been broken up, for the only reason disclosed in evidence. There must be something kept back by collusion, or otherwise. In this state of the case, the plaintiff may dismiss his bill, without prejudice, or continue it, as he shall be advised.

The cause was continued.



May term, 1834, the cause was again brought-to hearing, and further evidence heard. A divorce was decreed, and the plaintiff ordered to pay two hundred and fifty dollars alimony.
PUBLIC LAW 110–62—AUG. 9, 2007 121 STAT. 565 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1434: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

Apr. 23, considered and passed House. 

Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–62 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 896 Pittsburgh 

Street in Springdale, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Rachel Carson Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. RACHEL CARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 896 Pittsburgh Street in Springdale, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Rachel Carson Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Rachel Carson Post Office Building’’. 

Approved August 9, 2007. 

Aug. 9, 2007 

[H.R. 1434]
#### BELL *v.*HALLENBACK, ET AL.

Child’s wages — invested in real estate — subject to father’s debts — fraud.

A father has a right to the custody and earnings of his minor children, and if he invest their earnings in real'estate, and take a title to them, the estate will be charged with the debts he then owed.

If the father have other property to satisfy the judgment, he should so describe it that it maybe reached.

Chancery. The bill prays execution of two judgments against Hallenback, execution having been taken out and returned nulla bona. It claims that Hallenbach purchased two lots of ground, paid for them, and took the deed to his children, one aged fourteen, •and the other ten years. The answer of Hallenback admits the judgment, execution, purchase of the lots, and payment and deed, but he alleges that his boys earned the money and he invested it for -them, and that he has other property in Licking county.

The proof is, that the father purchased, and paid for the lots, built -a house upon them, took the deed to the boys, and has ever since ■exercised acts of ownership over them, and said he purchased for himself. The boys worked with their father on the canal, under his direction, and were supported by him.

*Olds,*for the complainant,

insisted upon his right to charge the judgment upon the lots, and that the earnings of the child, while supported by the father, belonged to the father.

*Caldwell*and *Irvin,*contra,

insisted the father merely took the ■earnings of his children in trust, to be invested for them, and cited 1 Blk. C. 453; *2Kent C.*194; 12 *Mass. R.*375; 15 *Mass. R.*174.

Collett, C. J.

The father as the natural guardian of his children is bound to support them, and as an equivalent, the law gives .him the custody of their persons during minority, and entitles him to their labor, or their wages, if they labor for others. In the present case, the earnings of the children, while working with him and *752supported by him, was his. If, therefore, that money alone purchased and improved the lots, it was his, and he could not by investing it in the name of his children, secure it for them or himself to the prejudice of his creditors. As to the property mentioned in Licking county there is no proof. The judgment will be charged on the lots, if not satisfied, and a sale will be decreed for that purpose.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Astrogeology Research Program

##### U.S. Geological SurveyOpen-File Report 2006-1367Version 1.0

# The Unified Lunar Control Network 2005

### *By* Brent A. Archinal, Mark R. Rosiek, Randolph L. Kirk, and Bonnie L. Redding

#### 2006

This report documents a new general unified lunar control network and lunar topographic model based on a combination of Clementine images and a previous network derived from Earth-based & Apollo photographs, and Mariner 10, & Galileo images.  This photogrammetric network solution is the largest planetary control network ever completed.  It includes the determination of the 3-D positions of 272,931 points on the lunar surface and the correction of the camera angles for 43,866 Clementine images, using 546,126 tie point measurements.  The solution RMS is 20 μm (= 0.9 pixels) in the image plane, with the largest residual of 6.4 pixels.  The explanation given here, along with the accompanying files, comprises the release of the network information and of global lunar digital elevation models (DEMs) derived from the network.  A paper that will describe the solution and network in further detail will be submitted to a refereed journal, and will include additional background information, solution details, discussion of accuracy and precision, and explanatory figures.

----

#### Files

Download this report as an 21-page PDF file (ULCN2005-OpenFile.pdf; 5.8 MB).

Read the 'readme file'; this file explains the files and folders for this report (ReadMe-ULCN2005.txt; 1.0 MB).

#### Data Folders

solution; solution input and output files (187 MB).

derived; Miscellaneous derived files of interest (107 MB).

dems; global DEMs and DEM images (257 MB).

For questions about the content of this report, contact Brent Archinal

Version history

----

Download a copy of the latest version of Adobe Reader for free.

| Help | PDF help | Publications main page || Western Open-File Reports for 2006 || Geologic Division | Astrogeology |
This report is available only on the Web

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey	URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1367/	Page Contact Information: Michael Diggles	Page Created: December 20, 2006	Page Last Modified: March 8, 2010
230213 EXHIBIT B. EXHIBIT COVER SHEET VERSION FEBRUARY 13, 2023 1 

EXHIBIT B1

PARTY EXHIBIT COVER SHEET

Name of Party

Does the Party intend to offer evidence?

Docket Entry No. for Party Exhibit List

Exhibit Identifier2 Docket Entry No. of Exhibit Is there a pending request to seal

this Exhibit? 

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Local Rule 9037-1(a), parties and counsel are solely responsible for 

redacting the personal identifiers enumerated in Fed. R. Bank. P. 9037(a). 

1

 This Party Exhibit Cover Sheet must be attached to a party-in-interest’s Informative 

Motion as Exhibit B.

2 Each Exhibit should be named in sequential party-identified numbering (e.g., “FOMB 

Ex. 1” or “UCC Ex. A”). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23571-2 Filed:02/17/23 Entered:02/17/23 15:29:59 Desc:

Exhibit B Page 1 of 1
§ 338.2 Definitions applicable to this subpart. For purposes of this subpart: ( a ) *Bank* means an insured state nonmember bank as defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.
( b ) *Dwelling* means any building, structure, or portion thereof which is occupied as, or designed or intended for occupancy as, a residence by one or more families, and any vacant land which is offered for sale or lease for the construction or location thereon of any such building, structure, or portion thereof.
( c ) *FDIC-supervised institution* means either a bank or a State savings association.
( d ) *Handicap* means, with respect to a person: ( 1 ) A physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person's major life activities;
( 2 ) A record of having such an impairment; or
( 3 ) Being regarded as having such an impairment, but such term does not include current, illegal use of or addiction to a controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)).
( e ) *Familial status* means one or more individuals (who have not attained the age of 18 years) being domiciled with: ( 1 ) A parent or another person having legal custody of such individual or individuals; or
( 2 ) The designee of such parent or other person having such custody, with the written permission of such parent or other person; and
( 3 ) The protections afforded against discrimination on the basis of familial status shall apply to any person who is pregnant or is in the process of securing legal custody of any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years.
( f ) *State savings association* has the same meaning as in section (3)(b)(3) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1813(b)(3).
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19823-1 Filed:01/18/22 Entered:01/19/22 15:46:48 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 1