# Official Journal C 331/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.331.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 331 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5412 November 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.331.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 331

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5412 November 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2011/C 331/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 319, 29.10.2011 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2011/C 331/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 319, 29.10.2011

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2011/C 331/02 | Case C-148/09 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 September 2011 — Kingdom of Belgium v Deutsche Post AG, DHL International, European Commission (Appeal — Action for annulment — State aid — Article 88(3) EC — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Commission decision not to raise objections — Concept of ‘doubts’ — Services of general economic interest) | 2 |
| 2011/C 331/03 | Case C-323/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 September 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England and Wales) (Chancery Division)) — Interflora Inc, Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc, Flowers Direct Online Ltd (Trade marks — Keyword advertising on the internet — Selection by the advertiser of a keyword corresponding to a competitor’s trade mark with a reputation — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 5(1)(a) and (2) — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 9(1)(a) and (c) — Condition that one of the trade mark’s functions be adversely affected — Detriment to the distinctive character of a trade mark with a reputation (‘dilution’) — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or repute of that trade mark (‘free-riding’)) | 2 |
| 2011/C 331/04 | Case C-482/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 September 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) — United Kingdom) — Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc. (Trade marks — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 9(1) — Concept of acquiescence — Limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Starting point for limitation period — Prerequisites for the limitation period to run — Article 4(1)(a) — Registration of two identical marks designating identical goods — Functions of the trade mark — Honest concurrent use) | 3 |
| 2011/C 331/05 | Case C-90/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 September 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — ‘Habitats’ directive — Conservation of natural habitats — Wild fauna and flora — Articles 4(4) and 6(1) and (2) — Establishment of priorities for special areas of conservation and of adequate protection thereof — Failure to ensure adequate legal protection of the special areas of conservation in the Canary Islands) | 4 |
| 2011/C 331/06 | Joined Cases C-244/10 and C-245/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 September 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Mesopotamia Broadcast A/S METV (C-244/10), Roj TV A/S (C-245/10) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Directive 89/552/EEC — Television broadcasting activities — Possibility for a Member State to prohibit on its territory the activities of a television broadcaster established in another Member State — Ground based on infringement of the principles of international understanding) | 4 |
| 2011/C 331/07 | Case C-295/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 September 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Republic of Lithuania) — Genovaitė Valčiukienė, Julija Pekelienė, Lietuvos žaliųjų judėjimas, Petras Girinskis, Laurynas Arimantas Lašas v Pakruojo rajono savivaldybė, Šiaulių visuomenės sveikatos centras, Šiaulių regiono aplinkos apsaugos departamentas (Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Plans which determine the use of small areas at local level — Article 3(3) — Documents relating to land planning at local level relating to only one subject of economic activity — Assessment under Directive 2001/42/EC precluded in national law — Member States’ discretion — Article 3(5) — Link with Directive 85/337/EEC — Article 11(1) and (2) of Directive 2001/42/EC) | 5 |
| 2011/C 331/08 | Case C-426/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 September 2011 — Bell & Ross BV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Klockgrossisten i Norden AB (Appeal — Signed original application lodged out of time — Regularisable defect) | 6 |
| 2011/C 331/09 | Case C-397/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Municipal Court lodged on 27 July 2011 — Jőrös Erika v Aegon Magyarország Hitel Zrt. | 6 |
| 2011/C 331/10 | Case C-415/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Mercantil de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 8 August 2011 — Mohamed Aziz v Caixa d’Estalvis de Catalunya, Tarragona i Manresa (Catalunyacaixa) | 7 |
| 2011/C 331/11 | Case C-418/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Austria), lodged on 10 August 2011 — TEXDATA Software GmbH | 7 |
| 2011/C 331/12 | Case C-425/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 16 August 2011 — Katja Ettwein v Finanzamt Konstanz | 8 |
| 2011/C 331/13 | Case C-429/11 P: Appeal brought on 18 August 2011 by Gosselin Group NV, formerly Gosselin World Wide Moving NV, against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Eighth Chamber) on 16 June 2011 in Joined Cases T-208/08 and T-209/08 Gosselin Group NV and Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje v European Commission | 8 |
| 2011/C 331/14 | Case C-434/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Alba (Romania) lodged on 22 August 2011 — Corpul Național al Polițiștilor, acting on behalf of its members serving with the Alba Inspectorate of Police v Ministerul Administrației și Internelor (MAI), Inspectoratul General al Poliției Române (IGPR), Inspectoratul de Poliție al Județului Alba (IPJ) | 9 |
| 2011/C 331/15 | Case C-436/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 26 August 2011 — Sandra Schüsslbauer, Martin Schüsslbauer, Maximilian Schüsslbauer v Iberia Lineas Aéreas de España SA | 10 |
| 2011/C 331/16 | Case C-437/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 26 August 2011 — Ekkerhard Schauß v Transportes Aéreos Portugueses SA | 10 |
| 2011/C 331/17 | Case C-440/11 P: Appeal brought on 26 August 2011 by the European Commission against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Eighth Chamber) on 16 June 2011 in Joined Cases T-208/08 and T-209/08 Gosselin Group NV and Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje v European Commission | 10 |
| 2011/C 331/18 | Case C-441/11 P: Appeal brought on 26 August 2011 by the European Commission against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Eighth Chamber) on 16 June 2011 in Case T-210/08 Verhuizingen Coppens NV v European Commission | 11 |
| 2011/C 331/19 | Case C-454/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Latvijas Republikas Augstākās tiesas Senāta Adminsitratīvo (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 1 September 2011 — Gunārs Pusts v Lauku atbalsta dienests | 12 |
| 2011/C 331/20 | Case C-456/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bremen (Germany) lodged on 2 September 2011 — Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG, ERGO Versicherung AG, Versicherungskammer Bayern-Versicherungsanstalt des öffentlichen Rechts, Nürnberger Allgemeine Versicherungs-AG, Krones AG v Samskip GmbH | 12 |
| 2011/C 331/21 | Case C-462/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Dâmbovița — Secția civilă (Romania) lodged on 5 September 2011 — Victor Cozman v Teatrul Municipal Târgoviște | 12 |
| 2011/C 331/22 | Case C-469/11 P: Appeal brought on 14 September 2011 by Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 22 June 2011 in Case T-409/09: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission | 13 |
| 2011/C 331/23 | Case C-470/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 14 September 2011 — SIA ‘Garkalns’ v Rīgas dome | 13 |
| 2011/C 331/24 | Case C-471/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 14 September 2011 — SIA ‘Cido Grupa’ v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests | 13 |
| | General Court |
| 2011/C 331/25 | Case T-30/03 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2011 — 3F v Commission (State aid — Fiscal aid granted by the Danish authorities — Seafarers employed on board vessels registered in the Danish International Register — Commission decision not to raise objections — Action for annulment — Serious difficulties) | 15 |
| 2011/C 331/26 | Case T-199/04: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2011 — Gul Ahmed Textile Mills v Council (Dumping — Imports of cotton bed linen originating in Pakistan — Injury — Causal link) | 15 |
| 2011/C 331/27 | Case T-352/05: Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Specific measures for certain agricultural products in favour of the minor islands of the Aegean Sea — Fruit and vegetables — Raw tobacco — Goat and sheepmeat — Non-compliance with the payment deadlines — Proportionality — Increase in the flat-rate correction for recurrent weaknesses) | 16 |
| 2011/C 331/28 | Case T-4/06: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — Poland v Commission (Agriculture — Act of Accession 2003 — Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 — Regulation (EC) No 1686/2005 — Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 — 2004/2005 marketing year — Additional levy — Setting of two coefficients — Competence — Legal basis — Empowering measure — Obligation to give reasons — Compliance with essential procedural requirements) | 16 |
| 2011/C 331/29 | Case T-442/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — Ryanair v Commission (State aid — Aviation sector — Aid granted by the Italian authorities to Alitalia, Air One and Meridiana — Action for failure to act — Failure by the Commission to define its position — Obligation to act) | 16 |
| 2011/C 331/30 | Case T-479/08: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — adidas v OHIM — Patrick Holding (Representation of a shoe with two stripes) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a Community figurative mark representing a shoe with two stripes on the side — Earlier national trade mark representing a shoe with three stripes on the side — Relative ground for refusal — Failure to substantiate the earlier right — Failure to translate elements essential to substantiating the registration of the earlier trade mark — Rule 16(3), Rule 17(2) and Rule 20(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95) | 17 |
| 2011/C 331/31 | Case T-581/08: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2011 — Perusahaan Otomobil Nasional v OHIM — Proton Motor Fuel Cell (PM PROTON MOTOR) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark PM PROTON MOTOR — Earlier national, Benelux and Community word and figurative marks PROTON — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Lack of similarity between the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)) | 17 |
| 2011/C 331/32 | Case T-207/09: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2011 — El Jirari Bouzekri v OHIM — Nike International (NC NICKOL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark NC NICKOL — Earlier Community figurative mark NIKE — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94) | 18 |
| 2011/C 331/33 | Case T-415/09: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — New Yorker SHK Jeans v OHIM — Vallis K. — Vallis A. (FISHBONE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the Community word mark FISHBONE — Earlier national figurative mark FISHBONE BEACHWEAR — Relative ground for refusal — Partial refusal of registration — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Consideration of additional evidence — Statement of reasons — Proof of genuine use — Likelihood of confusion — Article 42(2) and (3) and Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Second sentence of Rule 22(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — First subparagraph and second subparagraph, heading (a), of Article 15(1) and Article 42(2), (3) and (5) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009) | 18 |
| 2011/C 331/34 | Case T-107/10: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Cologne v OHIM — Natura Cosméticos (NATURAVIVA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark NATURAVIVA — Earlier Community word mark VIVA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — No similarity of the signs) | 19 |
| 2011/C 331/35 | Case T-150/10: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — Telefónica O2 Germany v OHIM — Loopia (LOOPIA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark LOOPIA — Earlier Community word marks LOOP and LOOPY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 19 |
| 2011/C 331/36 | Case T-356/10: Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — Nike International v OHIM — Deichmann (VICTORY RED) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the Community word mark VICTORY RED — Earlier international and national word marks Victory — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 19 |
| 2011/C 331/37 | Case T-403/10: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2011 — Brighton Collectibles v OHIM — Felmar (BRIGHTON) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for Community word mark ‘BRIGHTON’ — National word and figurative marks ‘BRIGHTON’ and earlier signs ‘BRIGHTON’ — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) and 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009) | 20 |
| 2011/C 331/38 | Case T-224/09: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2011 — CEVA v Commission (Action for annulment — Specific programme for research and technological development on energy, environment and sustainable development — Protop project — Subsidy contract — Demand for recovery of payments made on account pursuant to a contract for the financing of research — Sub-contracting — Enforcement order — Act not subject to review — Inadmissibility) | 20 |
| 2011/C 331/39 | Case T-84/10: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Regione Puglia v Commission (Action for annulment — ERDF — Decision incorporating reduction of financial assistance — Regional entity — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility) | 20 |
| 2011/C 331/40 | Case T-223/10: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Regione Puglia v Commission (ERDF — Reduction of financial assistance — Withdrawal of the contested debit note — Cessation of existence of the dispute — No need to adjudicate) | 21 |
| 2011/C 331/41 | Case T-239/10: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Italy v Commission (ERDF — Reduction of financial assistance — Withdrawal of the contested debit note — Cessation of existence of the dispute — No need to adjudicate) | 21 |
| 2011/C 331/42 | Case T-397/10: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2011 — ara v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Failure to submit the statement of grounds of appeal to the Board of Appeal within the prescribed time-limit Decision of the Board of Appeal rejecting an application of the full re-establishment of the applicant's rights — Action manifestly lacking a legal basis) | 21 |
| 2011/C 331/43 | Case T-597/10: Order of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Biodes v OHIM — Manasul Internacional (BIESUL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Cessation of existence of dispute — No need to adjudicate) | 22 |
| 2011/C 331/44 | Case T-598/10: Order of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Biodes v OHIM — Manasul Internacional (LINEASUL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Cessation of existence of dispute — No need to adjudicate) | 22 |
| 2011/C 331/45 | Case T-335/11: Action brought on 23 June 2011 — Republic of Bulgaria v Commission | 22 |
| 2011/C 331/46 | Case T-460/11: Action brought on 19 August 2011 — Scandic Distilleries v OHMI — Bürgerbräu, August Röhm & Söhne (BÜRGER) | 24 |
| 2011/C 331/47 | Case T-466/11: Action brought on 23 August 2011 — Ellinika Nafpigia and Hoern Beteiligungs Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung v Commission | 24 |
| 2011/C 331/48 | Case T-483/11: Action brought on 5 September 2011 — Sepro Europe v Commission | 25 |
| 2011/C 331/49 | Case T-485/11: Action brought on 12 September 2011 — Akzo Nobel and Akcros Chemicals v Commission | 25 |
| 2011/C 331/50 | Case T-488/11: Action brought on 9 September 2011 — Sarc v Commission | 26 |
| 2011/C 331/51 | Case T-490/11: Action brought on 15 September 2011 — Bena Properties v Council | 26 |
| 2011/C 331/52 | Case T-491/11 P: Appeal brought on 19 September 2011 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 30 June 2011 in Case F-14/10, Marcuccio v Commission | 27 |
| 2011/C 331/53 | Case T-494/11: Action brought on 16 September 2011 — Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Others v Commission | 27 |
| 2011/C 331/54 | Case T-210/10: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Condé v Council | 28 |
| 2011/C 331/55 | Case T-295/10: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Camara v Council | 28 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2011/C 331/02

Case C-148/09 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 September 2011 — Kingdom of Belgium v Deutsche Post AG, DHL International, European Commission (Appeal — Action for annulment — State aid — Article 88(3) EC — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Commission decision not to raise objections — Concept of ‘doubts’ — Services of general economic interest)

2

2011/C 331/03

Case C-323/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 September 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England and Wales) (Chancery Division)) — Interflora Inc, Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc, Flowers Direct Online Ltd (Trade marks — Keyword advertising on the internet — Selection by the advertiser of a keyword corresponding to a competitor’s trade mark with a reputation — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 5(1)(a) and (2) — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 9(1)(a) and (c) — Condition that one of the trade mark’s functions be adversely affected — Detriment to the distinctive character of a trade mark with a reputation (‘dilution’) — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or repute of that trade mark (‘free-riding’))

2

2011/C 331/04

Case C-482/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 September 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) — United Kingdom) — Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc. (Trade marks — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 9(1) — Concept of acquiescence — Limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Starting point for limitation period — Prerequisites for the limitation period to run — Article 4(1)(a) — Registration of two identical marks designating identical goods — Functions of the trade mark — Honest concurrent use)

3

2011/C 331/05

Case C-90/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 September 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — ‘Habitats’ directive — Conservation of natural habitats — Wild fauna and flora — Articles 4(4) and 6(1) and (2) — Establishment of priorities for special areas of conservation and of adequate protection thereof — Failure to ensure adequate legal protection of the special areas of conservation in the Canary Islands)

4

2011/C 331/06

Joined Cases C-244/10 and C-245/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 September 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Mesopotamia Broadcast A/S METV (C-244/10), Roj TV A/S (C-245/10) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Directive 89/552/EEC — Television broadcasting activities — Possibility for a Member State to prohibit on its territory the activities of a television broadcaster established in another Member State — Ground based on infringement of the principles of international understanding)

4

2011/C 331/07

Case C-295/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 September 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Republic of Lithuania) — Genovaitė Valčiukienė, Julija Pekelienė, Lietuvos žaliųjų judėjimas, Petras Girinskis, Laurynas Arimantas Lašas v Pakruojo rajono savivaldybė, Šiaulių visuomenės sveikatos centras, Šiaulių regiono aplinkos apsaugos departamentas (Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Plans which determine the use of small areas at local level — Article 3(3) — Documents relating to land planning at local level relating to only one subject of economic activity — Assessment under Directive 2001/42/EC precluded in national law — Member States’ discretion — Article 3(5) — Link with Directive 85/337/EEC — Article 11(1) and (2) of Directive 2001/42/EC)

5

2011/C 331/08

Case C-426/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 September 2011 — Bell & Ross BV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Klockgrossisten i Norden AB (Appeal — Signed original application lodged out of time — Regularisable defect)

6

2011/C 331/09

Case C-397/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Municipal Court lodged on 27 July 2011 — Jőrös Erika v Aegon Magyarország Hitel Zrt.

6

2011/C 331/10

Case C-415/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Mercantil de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 8 August 2011 — Mohamed Aziz v Caixa d’Estalvis de Catalunya, Tarragona i Manresa (Catalunyacaixa)

7

2011/C 331/11

Case C-418/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Austria), lodged on 10 August 2011 — TEXDATA Software GmbH

7

2011/C 331/12

Case C-425/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 16 August 2011 — Katja Ettwein v Finanzamt Konstanz

8

2011/C 331/13

Case C-429/11 P: Appeal brought on 18 August 2011 by Gosselin Group NV, formerly Gosselin World Wide Moving NV, against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Eighth Chamber) on 16 June 2011 in Joined Cases T-208/08 and T-209/08 Gosselin Group NV and Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje v European Commission

8

2011/C 331/14

Case C-434/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Alba (Romania) lodged on 22 August 2011 — Corpul Național al Polițiștilor, acting on behalf of its members serving with the Alba Inspectorate of Police v Ministerul Administrației și Internelor (MAI), Inspectoratul General al Poliției Române (IGPR), Inspectoratul de Poliție al Județului Alba (IPJ)

9

2011/C 331/15

Case C-436/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 26 August 2011 — Sandra Schüsslbauer, Martin Schüsslbauer, Maximilian Schüsslbauer v Iberia Lineas Aéreas de España SA

10

2011/C 331/16

Case C-437/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 26 August 2011 — Ekkerhard Schauß v Transportes Aéreos Portugueses SA

10

2011/C 331/17

Case C-440/11 P: Appeal brought on 26 August 2011 by the European Commission against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Eighth Chamber) on 16 June 2011 in Joined Cases T-208/08 and T-209/08 Gosselin Group NV and Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje v European Commission

10

2011/C 331/18

Case C-441/11 P: Appeal brought on 26 August 2011 by the European Commission against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Eighth Chamber) on 16 June 2011 in Case T-210/08 Verhuizingen Coppens NV v European Commission

11

2011/C 331/19

Case C-454/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Latvijas Republikas Augstākās tiesas Senāta Adminsitratīvo (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 1 September 2011 — Gunārs Pusts v Lauku atbalsta dienests

12

2011/C 331/20

Case C-456/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bremen (Germany) lodged on 2 September 2011 — Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG, ERGO Versicherung AG, Versicherungskammer Bayern-Versicherungsanstalt des öffentlichen Rechts, Nürnberger Allgemeine Versicherungs-AG, Krones AG v Samskip GmbH

12

2011/C 331/21

Case C-462/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Dâmbovița — Secția civilă (Romania) lodged on 5 September 2011 — Victor Cozman v Teatrul Municipal Târgoviște

12

2011/C 331/22

Case C-469/11 P: Appeal brought on 14 September 2011 by Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 22 June 2011 in Case T-409/09: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission

13

2011/C 331/23

Case C-470/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 14 September 2011 — SIA ‘Garkalns’ v Rīgas dome

13

2011/C 331/24

Case C-471/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 14 September 2011 — SIA ‘Cido Grupa’ v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

13

General Court

2011/C 331/25

Case T-30/03 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2011 — 3F v Commission (State aid — Fiscal aid granted by the Danish authorities — Seafarers employed on board vessels registered in the Danish International Register — Commission decision not to raise objections — Action for annulment — Serious difficulties)

15

2011/C 331/26

Case T-199/04: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2011 — Gul Ahmed Textile Mills v Council (Dumping — Imports of cotton bed linen originating in Pakistan — Injury — Causal link)

15

2011/C 331/27

Case T-352/05: Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Specific measures for certain agricultural products in favour of the minor islands of the Aegean Sea — Fruit and vegetables — Raw tobacco — Goat and sheepmeat — Non-compliance with the payment deadlines — Proportionality — Increase in the flat-rate correction for recurrent weaknesses)

16

2011/C 331/28

Case T-4/06: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — Poland v Commission (Agriculture — Act of Accession 2003 — Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 — Regulation (EC) No 1686/2005 — Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 — 2004/2005 marketing year — Additional levy — Setting of two coefficients — Competence — Legal basis — Empowering measure — Obligation to give reasons — Compliance with essential procedural requirements)

16

2011/C 331/29

Case T-442/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — Ryanair v Commission (State aid — Aviation sector — Aid granted by the Italian authorities to Alitalia, Air One and Meridiana — Action for failure to act — Failure by the Commission to define its position — Obligation to act)

16

2011/C 331/30

Case T-479/08: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — adidas v OHIM — Patrick Holding (Representation of a shoe with two stripes) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a Community figurative mark representing a shoe with two stripes on the side — Earlier national trade mark representing a shoe with three stripes on the side — Relative ground for refusal — Failure to substantiate the earlier right — Failure to translate elements essential to substantiating the registration of the earlier trade mark — Rule 16(3), Rule 17(2) and Rule 20(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

17

2011/C 331/31

Case T-581/08: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2011 — Perusahaan Otomobil Nasional v OHIM — Proton Motor Fuel Cell (PM PROTON MOTOR) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark PM PROTON MOTOR — Earlier national, Benelux and Community word and figurative marks PROTON — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Lack of similarity between the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009))

17

2011/C 331/32

Case T-207/09: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2011 — El Jirari Bouzekri v OHIM — Nike International (NC NICKOL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark NC NICKOL — Earlier Community figurative mark NIKE — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94)

18

2011/C 331/33

Case T-415/09: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — New Yorker SHK Jeans v OHIM — Vallis K. — Vallis A. (FISHBONE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the Community word mark FISHBONE — Earlier national figurative mark FISHBONE BEACHWEAR — Relative ground for refusal — Partial refusal of registration — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Consideration of additional evidence — Statement of reasons — Proof of genuine use — Likelihood of confusion — Article 42(2) and (3) and Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Second sentence of Rule 22(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — First subparagraph and second subparagraph, heading (a), of Article 15(1) and Article 42(2), (3) and (5) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009)

18

2011/C 331/34

Case T-107/10: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Cologne v OHIM — Natura Cosméticos (NATURAVIVA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark NATURAVIVA — Earlier Community word mark VIVA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — No similarity of the signs)

19

2011/C 331/35

Case T-150/10: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2011 — Telefónica O2 Germany v OHIM — Loopia (LOOPIA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark LOOPIA — Earlier Community word marks LOOP and LOOPY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

19

2011/C 331/36

Case T-356/10: Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — Nike International v OHIM — Deichmann (VICTORY RED) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the Community word mark VICTORY RED — Earlier international and national word marks Victory — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

19

2011/C 331/37

Case T-403/10: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2011 — Brighton Collectibles v OHIM — Felmar (BRIGHTON) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for Community word mark ‘BRIGHTON’ — National word and figurative marks ‘BRIGHTON’ and earlier signs ‘BRIGHTON’ — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) and 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009)

20

2011/C 331/38

Case T-224/09: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2011 — CEVA v Commission (Action for annulment — Specific programme for research and technological development on energy, environment and sustainable development — Protop project — Subsidy contract — Demand for recovery of payments made on account pursuant to a contract for the financing of research — Sub-contracting — Enforcement order — Act not subject to review — Inadmissibility)

20

2011/C 331/39

Case T-84/10: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Regione Puglia v Commission (Action for annulment — ERDF — Decision incorporating reduction of financial assistance — Regional entity — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)

20

2011/C 331/40

Case T-223/10: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Regione Puglia v Commission (ERDF — Reduction of financial assistance — Withdrawal of the contested debit note — Cessation of existence of the dispute — No need to adjudicate)

21

2011/C 331/41

Case T-239/10: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Italy v Commission (ERDF — Reduction of financial assistance — Withdrawal of the contested debit note — Cessation of existence of the dispute — No need to adjudicate)

21

2011/C 331/42

Case T-397/10: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2011 — ara v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Failure to submit the statement of grounds of appeal to the Board of Appeal within the prescribed time-limit Decision of the Board of Appeal rejecting an application of the full re-establishment of the applicant's rights — Action manifestly lacking a legal basis)

21

2011/C 331/43

Case T-597/10: Order of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Biodes v OHIM — Manasul Internacional (BIESUL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Cessation of existence of dispute — No need to adjudicate)

22

2011/C 331/44

Case T-598/10: Order of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Biodes v OHIM — Manasul Internacional (LINEASUL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Cessation of existence of dispute — No need to adjudicate)

22

2011/C 331/45

Case T-335/11: Action brought on 23 June 2011 — Republic of Bulgaria v Commission

22

2011/C 331/46

Case T-460/11: Action brought on 19 August 2011 — Scandic Distilleries v OHMI — Bürgerbräu, August Röhm & Söhne (BÜRGER)

24

2011/C 331/47

Case T-466/11: Action brought on 23 August 2011 — Ellinika Nafpigia and Hoern Beteiligungs Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung v Commission

24

2011/C 331/48

Case T-483/11: Action brought on 5 September 2011 — Sepro Europe v Commission

25

2011/C 331/49

Case T-485/11: Action brought on 12 September 2011 — Akzo Nobel and Akcros Chemicals v Commission

25

2011/C 331/50

Case T-488/11: Action brought on 9 September 2011 — Sarc v Commission

26

2011/C 331/51

Case T-490/11: Action brought on 15 September 2011 — Bena Properties v Council

26

2011/C 331/52

Case T-491/11 P: Appeal brought on 19 September 2011 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 30 June 2011 in Case F-14/10, Marcuccio v Commission

27

2011/C 331/53

Case T-494/11: Action brought on 16 September 2011 — Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Others v Commission

27

2011/C 331/54

Case T-210/10: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Condé v Council

28

2011/C 331/55

Case T-295/10: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Camara v Council

28

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN