alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10125]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Small Business Industrial Innovation 
(SBIR); Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Small Business Industrial 
Innovation (61).
    Date and Time: May 1-2, 2000, 8:00 am-5:00 pm.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Place: Room 120, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Contact Person: Cheryl Albus, Program Manager, (703) 306-1390, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 
22230.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning research programs pertaining to the small business 
community.
    Agenda: May 1, 2000, Room 120
    8:00 am-8:30 am: Introductions.
    8:30 am-9:00 am: Welcome.
    9:00 am-12:00N: Past Year's Accomplishments; Issues.
    12:00N-1:30 pm: Lunch.
    1:30 pm-3:30 pm: Issues (continued).
    3:30 pm-3:45 pm: Break.
    3:45 pm-4:15 pm: Issues (continued).
    4:15 pm-5:30 pm: Discussion.
    5:30 pm: Adjourn.
    May 2, 2000, Room 120
    8:00 am-10:00 am: Preparation of Committee Report.
    10:00 am-10:30 am: Break.
    10:30 am-12:30 pm: Feedback from the Committee.
    12:30 pm----.

    Dated: April 19, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-10125 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Charles Laron HACKNEY *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 73-24

493 S.W. 2d 142

Opinion delivered April 23, 1973

*James M. Simpson,*for appellant.

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., by: *Gene O'Daniel,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

In this Rule I procedure appellant sought to set aside a verdict guilty on that one of the jurors had a pre-conceived opinion of appellant’s guilt and failed to divulge it to the court on voir dire. From the testimony of two affiants for appellant and the testimony of the juror introduced by the State, the trial court denied relief and hence this appeal.

The first witness for appellant was William Russ-worm, a former schoolmate of appellant. The witness said he worked with Charles Ray Nobles, one of the jurors in appellant’s case; that witness heard the juror make the statement that he drought appellant was “guilty of shooting the man”; and that the statement was made before the trial. The witness admitted on cross-examination that he was a good friend of appellant and “I would like to help him if I could”.

Appellant’s other witness was Edward Via, who testified that he worked with Mr. Nobles at International Paper Company. The witness said he and juror Nobles discussed the homicide on several occasions up until the *297time of trial. The sum total of his testimony was that Nobles said he thought the appellant was guilty and that appellant had tried to establish an alibi. The witness also testified that he was a good friend of appellant and would like to help him.

Juror Nobles related that the two witnesses for Hackney had worked on the juror’s shift at the paper company and that he had known them for several years. He said he read about the Hackney homicide in the paper and heard about it over the radio. He was not certain that it had been, or not been, a subject of conversation during work recesses at the mill. On three occasions in his testimony he said he did not recall having made the statements attributed to him by appellant’s witnesses; on two other occasions he categorically denied having made a statement concerning appellant’s guilt. The juror stated that he entered the jury box with a free and open mind and based his judgment of guilty on the evidence produced at the trial.

We have before us the single issue of credibility. The trial court elected to believe the testimony of the juror when he said he made no pre-trial statements and we certainly cannot say the court’s judgment was misplaced.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                          46,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,603
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,303
<PP&E>                                          12,318
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 285,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,306
<BONDS>                                         40,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           216
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   285,733
<SALES>                                        228,775
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               228,775
<CGS>                                           95,190
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,430
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 75,740
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,796
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             45,944
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,944
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.11
        

</TABLE>
#### § 46.2 Definitions.

For purposes of this part, the following definitions apply:

*Call Report* means the Consolidated Report of Condition and Income.

*Covered institution* means a national bank or Federal savings association with average total consolidated assets, calculated as required under this part, that are greater than $250 billion.

*Federal savings association* has the same meaning as in 12 U.S.C. 1813(b)(2).

*Planning horizon* means a set period of time over which the impact of the scenarios is assessed.

*Pre-provision net revenue* means the sum of net interest income and non-interest income less expenses before adjusting for loss provisions.

*Reporting year* means the calendar year in which a covered institution must conduct, report, and publish its stress test.

*Scenarios* means sets of conditions that affect the U.S. economy or the financial condition of a covered institution that the OCC determines are appropriate for use in the stress tests under this part, including, but not limited to, baseline and severely adverse scenarios.

*Stress test* means a process to assess the potential impact of scenarios on the consolidated earnings, losses, and capital of a covered institution over the planning horizon, taking into account the covered institution's current condition, risks, exposures, strategies, and activities.

[77 FR 61246, Oct. 9, 2012, as amended at 83 FR 7953, Feb. 23, 2018; 84 FR 54475, Oct. 10, 2019]
EXHIBIT E 

Summary of Marchand ICS Group Expenses 

Service Description Amount

Cloud Storage $47.96

Facebook Advertising $44.17

TOTAL $92.13

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22946-5 Filed:11/30/22 Entered:11/30/22 16:44:02 Desc:

Exhibit E Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                                                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350                                                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Theragenics Corporation®, (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James A. MacLennan, Treasurerand Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operation of the Company. 

 
By:/s/ James A. MacLennan      James A. MacLennan       Treasurer and      Chief Financial Officer      November 14, 2002
#### SMITHERON *v.*OWENS.

If the suit be in *debt*and without the actual *appearance*of the defendant, a declaration is filed in assumpsit, and judgment taken by default, it is erroneous, because the suit is changed.

The service of summons in a case, by the statute places the defendant in court in the suit brought, and if the plaintiff would change his suit, he must begin de novo, or take measures to compel an actual appearance.

Error to the Common Pleas. Owens sued Smitheron in *debt,*the writ was served, but no appearance was entered. Owens declared in assumpsit, and took a final judgment for damages in default of a plea.

*Strait,*for the plaintiff in error,

cited 1 *Sel. Pr.*346.

*Storer,*contra.

By the Court.

There was no appearance of the defendant below, and the plaintiff proceeded at his peril. It is true, the law declares a defendant who is *served with process, in court,*for certain purposes. A plaintiff may prosecute *the suit*he has brought, to judgment, but he cannot substitute another for it. The judgment is reversed with' costs, and remanded back to be reinstated at the return of the writ, and for further proceedings.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adelphia Communications Corporation ("Adelphia") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William T. Schleyer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Adelphia, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Adelphia.

|Date: | November 17, 2005 |  | /s/WILLIAM T. SCHLEYERWilliam T. Schleyer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|----- | ----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
To navigate through the Ribbon, use standard browser navigation keys. To skip between groups, use Ctrl+LEFT or Ctrl+RIGHT. To jump to the first Ribbon tab use Ctrl+[. To jump to the last selected command use Ctrl+]. To activate a command, use Enter.

              - BrowseTab 1 of 2.
              - PageTab 2 of 2.

            -  ABOUT  ABOUT CCSDSAbout CCSDSOverview MaterialsCharterManagement StructureTechnical OrganizationStandards Dev ProcessHistoryFAQsContact UsMember AgenciesSpacecraft IDABOUT ISO TC20/SC13ISO TC20/SC13 ContentsTC20/SC13 CharterCCSDS LEADERSHIPManagement CouncilArea Directors and DeputiesCCSDS Hall of Fame 
            -  PUBLICATIONS  SORTED BY COLOROverviewBlue: Recommended StandardsMagenta: Recommended PracticesGreen: Informational ReportsOrange: ExperimentalYellow: RecordSilver: HistoricalAll Active PublicationsRecently Released DocumentsSORTED BY AREASpace Internetworking ServicesMission Operations & InformationManagement ServicesSpacecraft Onboard InterfaceServicesSystem EngineeringCross Support ServicesSpace Link ServicesOTHER DOCUMENTSReview DocumentsReference ModelsNon-English Versionof Documents 
            -  REVIEWS 
            -  MEETINGS  CCSDS MEETINGS2024 Fall Meetings2024 Spring Meetings2023 Fall Meetings2023 Spring Meetings2022 Fall Meetings2022 Spring Meetings2021 Fall Meetings2021 Spring Meetings2020 Fall Meetings2020 Spring Meetings2019 Fall Meetings2019 Spring Meetings2018 Fall MeetingsMeetings - ArchivesEVENTS & CONFERENCESCurrentPrevious 
            -  OUTREACH  LogosCCSDS MerchandiseVideosOverview MaterialsConferences with CCSDS 
            -  PARTICIPATION  OverviewMember AgenciesObserver AgenciesAssociatesLiaison Organizations 
            -  IMPLEMENTATIONS  OverviewMissionsCompliant ProductsTraining and CoursesImplementation SoftwareConference Resources 
            -  ** 

- Home
- Publications

## Publications

				Locate CCSDS Documents by Book Color, CCSDS Area, or by using the Interactive Space Data System Reference Model (see below).  				To better understand the CCSDS Standards Development Process 				click here.	                          	Publications Sorted by Book Color				- Blue: Recommended Standards				- Magenta: Recommended Practices				- Green: Informational Reports				- Orange: Experimental				- Yellow: Record				- Silver: Historical				- All Active PublicationsPublications Sorted by CCSDS Area				- Space Internetworking Services				- Mission Ops. And Information Management Services				- Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services				- System Engineering				- Cross Support Services				- Space Link Services				Interactive Technical Area Reference Model:				Please click on a Technical Area link below to find the associated CCSDS Documents.				

Copyright 2024 © CCSDS/ASRC Federal Agile Decision Sciences All rights reserved.
        -  Contact Us
        - Security & Privacy Notice
        -  FAQs
§ 614.4460 Loan approval responsibility. Approval of the following loans is the responsibility of each district board of directors. The responsibility may be discharged by prior approval of such loans by the appropriate bank board, or establishment of a policy under which the authority to approve such loans is delegated to bank management (except paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section which cannot be delegated to management). If the approval of such loans is to be delegated to bank management, the loans are to be submitted promptly for post review by the bank board and a report disclosing all material facts relating to the credit relationship involved shall be submitted annually by bank management to the district board. ( a ) Loans to a member of the Farm Credit Administration Board.
( b ) Loans to a member of the district board.
( c ) Loans to a cooperative of which a member of a bank board of directors is a member of the board of directors, an officer, or employee.
( d ) Loans to the president of a Farm Credit bank.
( e ) Loans to employees of the Farm Credit Administration.
( f ) Loans where directors, officers or employees designated above: ( 1 ) Are to receive proceeds of the loan in excess of an amount prescribed by an appropriate bank board, or
( 2 ) Are stockholders or owners of equity in a legal entity to which the loan is to be made wherein they have a significant personal or beneficial interest in the loan proceeds thereof or the security, or
( 3 ) Are endorsers, guarantors or co-makers in excess of an amount prescribed by an appropriate bank board.
[38 FR 27837, Oct. 9, 1973, as amended at 39 FR 29585, Aug. 16, 1974. Redesignated at 46 FR 51878, Oct. 22, 1981, and amended at 51 FR 41947, Nov. 20, 1986; 54 FR 1151, Jan. 12, 1989; 54 FR 50736, Dec. 11, 1989; 56 FR 2674, Jan. 24, 1991]
§ 28.13 Permissible activities. ( a ) *Applicability of laws* — ( 1 ) *General.* Except as otherwise provided by the IBA, other Federal laws or regulations, or otherwise determined by the OCC, the operations of a foreign bank at a Federal branch or agency shall be conducted with the same rights and privileges and subject to the same duties, restrictions, penalties, liabilities, conditions, and limitations that would apply if the Federal branch or agency were a national bank operating at the same location.
( 2 ) *Parent foreign bank senior management approval.* Unless otherwise provided by the OCC, any provision in law, regulation, policy, or procedure that requires a national bank to obtain the approval of its board of directors will be deemed to require a Federal branch or agency to obtain the approval of parent foreign bank senior management.
( b ) *Management of shell branches* — ( 1 ) *Federal branches and agencies.* A Federal branch or agency of a foreign bank shall not manage, through an office of the foreign bank that is located outside the United States and that is managed or controlled by that Federal branch or agency, any type of activity that a United States bank is not permitted to manage at any branch or subsidiary of the United States bank that is located outside the United States.
( 2 ) *Activities managed in foreign branches or subsidiaries of United States banks.* The types of activities referred to in paragraph (b)(1) of this section include the types of activities authorized to a United States bank by state or Federal charters, regulations issued by chartering or regulatory authorities, and other United States banking laws. However, United States procedural or quantitative requirements that may be applicable to the conduct of those activities by United States banks do not apply.
( c ) *Additional guidance regarding permissible activities.* For purposes of section 7(h) of the IBA, 12 U.S.C. 3105(h), the OCC may issue opinions, interpretations, or rulings regarding permissible activities of Federal branches.
Avenal Energy Project / EPA Region 9 Meeting 

Feb. 23, 2010 – 8:00 am 

Agenda 

1. Introductions 

2. PSD Permit Status 

a. Litigation Option 

b. Potential Permit Amendment Options 

3. Next Steps
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1679
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       16
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1696
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              172
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1696
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   156
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        9
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    79
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     67
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 67
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        67
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
§ 615.5010 Funding Corporation. ( a ) The Funding Corporation shall issue, market, and handle the obligations of the banks issued under section 4.2(b) through (d) of the Act and interbank or intersystem flow of funds as may from time to time be required, and, upon request of the banks, shall handle investment portfolios. The Funding Corporation shall maintain accurate and timely records. The System banks shall provide for the sale of such obligations through the Funding Corporation by negotiation, offer, bid, or syndicate sale, and for the delivery of such obligations by book entry, wire transfer, or such other means as may be appropriate.
( b ) The interaction of the System with the financial community shall be conducted principally through the Funding Corporation. The Funding Corporation shall be subject to regulation and examination by the Farm Credit Administration.
[54 FR 1158, Jan. 12, 1989]
-  Home 
-  Explore Topics and Geography 
-  Geography 
-  Geospatial Portal 

# In This Section

                      -  Geospatial Portal 
                      -  Data 
                      -  Maps 
                      -  Applications 
                      -  About 

## Related Links

                  -                                          NTAD Archive                   
                  -                                          National Transportation Noise Map                   

# National Transportation Atlas Database

The National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD), published by BTS, is a set of nationwide geographic databases of transportation facilities, transportation networks, and associated infrastructure.  These datasets include spatial information for transportation modal networks and intermodal terminals, as well as the related attribute information for these features.  There are around 90 total datasets that make up NTAD.  Metadata documentation, as prescribed by the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC), is also provided for each database. These data support research, analysis, and decision-making across all modes of transportation.  They are most useful at the national level, but have major applications at regional, state, and local scales throughout the transportation community.  The current NTAD databases are designed for use within a geographic information system (GIS); however, the attribute data for each dataset can be accessed in any database, spreadsheet, or other software package.  In 2016, NTAD switched from an annual update to updates on a continuous basis.  The BTS is interested in providing different distribution approaches and developing additional datasets.