Federal Register / Vol. 5, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2000 / Notices 2617

results of the oral rat and rabbit

developmental toxicity studies and the

2-generation reproductive toxicity study

in rats. The developmental studies in

rats and rabbits demonstrate that no

prenatal extra sensitivity is present.

However, based on the developmental

effects observed in rabbits, an acute

dietary risk assessment was performed

for women age 13 and older. The MOE

was estimated greater than 1,000,000.

Therefore, IR-4 concludes that reliable

data support use of the standard 100-

fold MOE/uncertainty factor and that an

additional tenfold safety factor is not

needed to protect infants and children.

F. International Tolerances

There are no Codex or Mexican limits

for prometryn on cilantro. This proposal

will harmonize tolerances with 0.1 ppm

Canadian maximum limit for residues in

cilantro.

[FR Doc. 00–1064 Filed 1–14–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION

Agency Information Collection

Activities: Submission for OMB

Review; Final Comment Request

AGENCY: Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission.

ACTION: Final Notice of Submission for

OMB Review; Final Comment Request

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act, the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission

(EEOC) has submitted a request for

clearance of the information collection

described below to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB). A

notice that the EEOC would be

submitting this request was published

in the Federal Register on October 14,

1999, allowing for a 60-day public

comment period. No public comments

were received.

DATES: Written comments on this final

notice must be submitted on or before

February 17, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this final

notice should be submitted to the Office

of Information and Regulatory Affairs,

Attention: Stuart Shapiro, Desk Officer

for the U.S. Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission, Office of

Management and Budget, 725 17th

Street, NW, Room 10235, New

Executive Office Building, Washington,

DC 20503 or electronically mailed to

SSHAPIRO@OMB.EOP.GOV. Requests

for copies of the proposed information

collection request should be addressed

to Mr. Neckere at the address below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joachim Neckere, Director, Program

Research and Surveys Division, 1801 L

Street, NW, Room 9222, Washington,

DC 20507, (202) 663–4958 (voice) or

(202) 663–7063 TDD).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Collection

Title: Local Union Report (EEO–3).

OMB–Number: 3046–0006.

Frequency of Report: Biennial.

Type of Respondent: Referral local

unions with 100 or more members.

Description of Affected Public:

Referral local unions and independent

or unaffiliated referral unions and

similar labor organizations.

Number of Responses: 3,000.

Reporting Hours: 3,000 (4,500 hours

including recordkeeping).

Number of Forms: 1.

Federal Cost: $43,500.

Abstract: Section 709(c) of Title VII of

the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as

amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e–8(c), requires

employers to make and keep records

relevant to a determination of whether

unlawful employment practices have

been or are being committed and to

make reports therefrom as required by

the EEOC. Accordingly, the EEOC has

issued regulations which set forth the

reporting requirements for various kinds

of labor organizations. Referral local

unions with 100 or more members have

been required to submit EEO–3 reports

since 1967 (biennially beginning in

1986).

EEO–3 data are used by the EEOC to

investigate charges of discrimination

against referral local unions. In

addition, the data are used to support

EEOC decisions and conciliations, and

for research. Pursuant to section 709(d)

of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, as amended, EEO–3 data are also

shared with 86 State and local Fair

Employment Practices Agencies

(FEPAs).

Burden Statement: The respondent

burden for this information collection is

minimal. The estimated number of

respondents included in the biennial

EEO–3 survey is 3,000 referral unions.

Total biennial reporting is estimated to

be 3,000 hours, and total biennial

reporting and recordkeeping is 4,500

hours. Because referral local unions

often have small management staffs, the

use of filing the EEO–3 report by

diskette or magnetic tape, although

encouraged, has been less successful.

Dated: January 10, 2000.

Ida L. Castro,

Chairwoman.

[FR Doc. 00–1006 Filed 1–14–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6150–01–M

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD

Sunshine Act Meeting

Announcing an Open Meeting of the

Board

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 A.M., Wednesday,

January 19, 2000.

PLACE: Board Room, Second Floor,

Federal Housing Finance Board, 1777 F

Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006.

STATUS: The entire meeting will be open

to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED DURING

PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC:

• Final Rule: Reorganization of

Finance Board Regulations

Proposed Rule: Calculation of

REFCorp Obligation

• Interim Final Rule: Amendments to

Election Regulation

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Elaine L. Baker, Secretary to the Board,

(202) 408–2837.

William W. Ginsberg,

Managing Director.

[FR Doc. 00–1167 Filed 1–13–00; 11:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6725–01–P

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 00–01]

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. v.

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.; Notice

of Filing of Complaint and Assignment

Notice is given that a complaint was

filed by Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.

(‘‘Complainant’’), against

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(‘‘Respondent’’). The complaint was

served on January 7, 2000. Complainant

alleges that Respondent, an ocean

transportation intermediary, violated

section 10(a)(1) of the Shipping Act of

1984, 46 U.S.C. app. section 1709(a)(1),

by incurring unpaid freight charges

pursuant a service contract in the

amount of $265,126.23, making false

representations, uttering checks without

funds, and presenting false Wire

Transfer Requests.

This proceeding has been assigned to

the office of Administrative Law Judges.

Hearing in this matter, if any is held,

shall commence within the time

limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61,

and only after consideration has been

given by the parties and the presiding

officer to the use of alternative forms of

dispute resolution. The hearing shall

include oral testimony and crossexamination in the discretion of the

presiding officer only upon proper

showing that there are genuine issues of

material fact that cannot be resolved on