alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT D

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19995-7 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 17:51:17 Desc:

Exhibit D Celia P. Santiago -Sp Page 1 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19995-7 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 17:51:17 Desc:

Exhibit D Celia P. Santiago -Sp Page 2 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19995-7 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 17:51:17 Desc:

Exhibit D Celia P. Santiago -Sp Page 3 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19995-7 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 17:51:17 Desc:

Exhibit D Celia P. Santiago -Sp Page 4 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19995-7 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 17:51:17 Desc:

Exhibit D Celia P. Santiago -Sp Page 5 of 5
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3264

To amend subtitle IV of title 40, United States Code, regarding county 

additions to the Appalachian region. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2003

Mrs. BLACKBURN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend subtitle IV of title 40, United States Code, 

regarding county additions to the Appalachian region.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONS TO APPALACHIAN REGION. 

4 Section 14102(a)(1)(K) of title 40, United States 

5 Code, is amended—

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘Hickman’’ after ‘‘Hawkins,’’; 

7 (2) by inserting ‘‘Perry,’’ after ‘‘Overton,’’; and 

8 (3) by inserting ‘‘Wayne,’’ after ‘‘Washington,’’.

Æ
Exhibit 4.5

                                                      Grant Date
                                                      ----------


Dept./Store
Employee Name
Employee Address
Employee Address


RE:  STOCK OPTION ACCEPTANCE



DEAR EMPLOYEE:

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the CBRL GROUP, INCORPORATED'S ["PLAN
NAME"] (the "Plan"), you have been granted a Non-Qualified Stock Option to
purchase [number of] shares (the "Option") of common stock as outlined below.

     Granted To:              [Employee Name]       SSN:  [Employee SSN]

     Grant Date:              [Issue Date]

     Options Granted:         [Number of Shares]    Total Cost to Exercise
                                                    For [shares granted]
                                                    Shares: $______

     Option Price Per Share:  $ [Grant Price]

     Expiration Date:         [Grant Expiration Date]

Vesting does not begin, pursuant to the Plan, until ONE YEAR AFTER THE DATE
OF THE GRANT.

Vesting Schedule:   3 year plan

Shares Vested                        Total Shares Vested at Date
One-third on 1 year from grant date  One-third on 1 year from grant date
One-third on 2 years from grant date Two-thirds on 2 years from grant date
One-third on 3 years from grant date Three-thirds on 2 years from grant date


Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, this Option shall be
exercisable as to vested shares, in whole or in part, beginning one year from
the Grant Date, but not after the day which is 10 years after the Grant Date.

By my signature below, I acknowledge receipt of this Option Grant on the date
shown above, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.  I also
acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and agree to comply with all of the
terms and conditions of the Option Grant and the Plan.

Signature:                                              Date:
          -------------------------------------              ----------------
          [EMPLOYEE NAME]   [Grant Code]

          Cracker Barrel Old Country Store

          Note:  If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown
above, please make the appropriate corrections on this form.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN 0648-XS14

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) will hold a public meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 27, 2009, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Holiday Inn BWI Airport, 890 Elkridge Landing Road, Linthicum Heights, MD 21090, telephone: (410) 859-8400.

*Council address*: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 300 S. New Street, Room 2115, Dover, DE 19904; telephone: (302) 674-2331.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Daniel T. Furlong, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 300 S. New Street, Room 2115, Dover, DE 19904; telephone: (302) 674-2331, extension 19.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of this meeting is: (1) specification of Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC) for spiny dogfish for the upcoming fishing year(s); (2) review of the Management Strategy Evaluation project and research priorities to address scientific uncertainty and development of ABC control rules for managed species, and (3) to discuss the role of the SSC members relative to stock assessment working groups and Stock Assessment Review Committee (SARC) Chairmanship.

## Special Accommodations

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to M. Jan Bryan at the Mid-Atlantic Council Office, (302) 674-2331 extension 18, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

Dated: October 5, 2009.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. E9-24314 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
§ 703.17 Conflicts of interest. ( a ) A Federal credit union's officials and senior management employees, and their immediate family members, may not receive anything of value in connection with its investment transactions. This prohibition also applies to any other employee, such as an investment officer, if the employee is directly involved in investments, unless the Federal credit union's board of directors determines that the employee's involvement does not present a conflict of interest. This prohibition does not include compensation for employees.
( b ) A Federal credit union's officials and employees must conduct all transactions with business associates or family members that are not specifically prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section at arm's length and in the Federal credit union's best interest.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24190-24191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10225]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2114-083]


Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington; Notice 
of Petition for Declaratory Order

April 19, 2000.
    On April 11, 2000, a petition for declaratory order was filed by 
PacifiCorp; Portland General Electric Company; Puget Sound Energy, 
Inc.; Eugene Water and Electric Board; City of McMinnville, Oregon; 
City of Forest Grove, Oregon; Kootenai Electric Cooperative, Inc.; 
Clearwater Power Company; Idaho County Light & Power Cooperative 
Association, Inc.; and Northern Lights, Inc. The petition requests the 
Commission to issue a declaratory order finding that Public Law No. 
544, 83d Congress, 68 Stat. 573 (1954), does not limit the identity of 
potential applicants for a new license for the Priest Rapids 
Hydroelectric Project No. 2114. The original license for the project 
was issued to the Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, 
Washington, effective November 1, 1955, and expires on October 31, 
2005.\1\ The petitioner assert that issuance of a declaratory order is 
necessary to resolve uncertainty regarding whether an entity other than 
Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County or an agency of the State 
of Washington may obtain a new license to operate the project after the 
original license expires.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 14 FPC 1067 (1955).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Anyone may submit comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene, in 
accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, 385.211 and 385.214. In determining the 
appropriate action to take, the Commission will consider all protests 
and other comments, but only those who file a

[[Page 24191]]

motion to intervene may become a party to the proceeding. Comments, 
protests, or motions to intervene must be filed by May 25, 2000; must 
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS,'' ``PROTEST,'' or 
``MOTION TO INTERVENE,'' as applicable, and Project No. 2114-083. Send 
the filings (original and 8 copies) to: The Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426. A 
copy of any filing must also be served on each representative of the 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
petitioner named in its petition.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10225 Filed 4-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### § 714.1 What does this part cover?

This part covers the standards and requirements that you, a federal credit union, must follow when engaged in the leasing of personal property.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.
**Title:****Inside IAQ [electronic resource].
 
SuDoc Number:EP 11.2:IN 2/
Item Number:0431-Y (online)
CGP System Number:000611938
 
Fall/Winter 1993
Spring/Summer 1995
Fall/Winter 1995
Spring/Summer 1996
Fall/Winter 1996
Spring/Summer 1997
Spring/Summer 1998
Fall/Winter 1998
Spring/Summer 1999
Spring/Summer 2001
Fall/Winter 2002
Spring/Summer 2003
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
July 17, 2017********
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, David Bolink, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-Q  of  Chell  Group
Corporation. ("Chell");

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of Chell
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. Chell's other  certifying  officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Chell and have:

      a.  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
      disclosure  controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision,
      to ensure  that  material  information  relating to Chell,  including  its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

      b.  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  Chell's  disclosure   controls  and
      procedures and presented in this quarterly  report our  conclusions  about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation;

      c.  disclosed in this report any change in Chell's  internal  control over
      financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  Chell's  most recent  fiscal
      quarter  that  has  materially  affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to
      materially affect, Chell's internal control over financial reporting;

5. Chell's  other  certifying  officer and I have  disclosed,  based on our most
recent  evaluation  of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to Chell's
auditors and the audit committee of Chell's board of directors:

      a. all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
      operation  of  internal   control  over  financial   reporting  which  are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect Chell's ability to record,  process,
      summarize and report financial information; and

      b. any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees who have a  significant  role in Chell's  internal  control over
      financial reporting.

DATE: November 30, 2004


                                                  By  /s/ David Bolink
                                                      ------------------------
                                                      DAVID BOLINK
                                                      CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER



                                      -25-
#### BALDWIN v. CREED, ET AL.

Chancery — appeal—final decree — demurrer overruled — practice.

Appeals in chancery Jie only from decrees final in the case, or of the subject in controversy* When a demurrer is overruled, the complainant may proceed to a decree, taking the bill as confessed, or the defendant may be permitted to answer, and bring the case to hearing on its merits.

Chancery. Motion by the defendant to quash this appeal as improperly entered.

Rebar,

opposed the motion.

By the Court.

The record shows that the defendants demurred to the bill, 'and that the Court of Common Pleas disallowed the demurrer, when without further order, notice of an appeal was entered, and the cause has been brought up. The statute only allows an appeal from decrees, which are final either in the cause, or ás to the subject in controversy. When a demurrer is overruled, the statute provides, either that the hill may be thereon taken as confessed and a final decree entered, or that the court may, on affidavit of merits, permit an answer to he filed, and have the cause brought to a hearing. Neither of these courses has been pursued in this case: but however that may be, there has been no bond given to appeal the case.

Let the case be struck from the docket.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T J UL Y 19, 2010 J OHN L EY CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 9

- 1 6 3 8 7 N o n
- A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 9

- 2 0 7 4 1

- C R

- P C H

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

L O N N I E J O H N S O N ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f F l o r i d a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( J u l y 1 9 , 2 0 1 0 )

B e f o r e E D M O N D S O N , B L A C K a n d F A Y , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :

B r i a n L

. S t e k l o f

f , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f

o r L o n n i e J o h n s o n , h a s f i l e d a m o t i o nt o w i t h d r a w f r o m f u r t h e r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n , s u p p o r t e d b y a b r i e f p r e p a r e d p u r s u a n t t o

A n d e r s v

. C a l i

f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r
i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e

r e l a t i v e m e r i t i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d

r e v e a l s n o a r g u a b l e i s s u e s o f m e r i t , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D ,

a n d J o h n s o n ’ s c o n v i c t i o n a n d s e n t e n c e a r e A F F I R M E D

.

2
EXHIBIT I 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2248-9 Filed:01/16/18 Entered:01/16/18 18:19:31 Desc:

Exhibit I Page 1 of 2
D: +1 212 225 2276 

rcooper@cgsh.com 

June 30, 2016 

VIA EMAIL 

Salvatore A. Romanello 

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, New York 10153 

salvatore.romanello@weil.com 

Re: June 29, 2016 Letter to Ms. Melba Acosta Febo 

Dear Sal: 

I refer to our recent conversation regarding your letter to Ms. Melba Acosta Febo, 

President of the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (“GDB”), dated June 29, 2016, 

which addresses certain funds (the “SIB Funds”) held in an account at GDB. 

To respond officially to your letter, and as we discussed during our conversation, 

our understanding is that – whether or not GDB was contractually obligated to hold the SIB 

Funds in a trust account – the SIB Funds were in fact held in a deposit account at GDB, and 

therefore we understand that they are subject to the restrictions on disbursements that Act 21-

2016 imposes on deposits held at GDB. If other facts come to light or our understanding 

changes, we will inform you promptly. 

 Best, 

Richard J. Cooper 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2248-9 Filed:01/16/18 Entered:01/16/18 18:19:31 Desc:

Exhibit I Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1

                                   Quipp, Inc.

                  Certification by the Chief Executive Officer
          Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements


          I, Michael S. Kady, Chief Executive Officer of Quipp, Inc., a Florida
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:

         (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      * * *


/s/ Michael S. Kady
---------------------------
Michael S. Kady
Chief Executive Officer

Date:    November 12, 2002
THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP

SCOTT P. STOLLEY

ATTORNEYS AND COUNSE LORS

AUSTIN

DALLAS

FORT WORTH

HOUSTON

LOS ANGELES

NEW YORK

SAN FRANCISCO

----------------------------------------------- ALGIERS

LONDON

MÉXICO CITY

MONTERREY

PARIS

ONE ARTS PLAZA

1722 ROUTH STREET ● SUITE 1500

DALLAS, TEXAS 75201-2533

214.969.1700

FAX 214.969.1751

www.tklaw.com

DIRECT DIAL: (214) 969-1678

EMAIL: Scott.Stolley@tklaw.com

Board Certified – Civil Appellate Law

Texas Board of Legal Specialization

April 14, 2015 

Mrs. Lisa Matz, Clerk of the Court

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas 

at Dallas 

600 Commerce Street 

Suite 200 

Dallas, Texas 75202

 Re: MRC Permian Company and Joe Foran v. Three Rivers Operating 

 Company and Three Rivers Acquisition LLC

 Court of Appeals No. 05-14-00353-CV 

 Trial Court Case No. DC-12-12637-A 

 T&K File No. 519499.000002

Dear Mrs. Matz: 

In response to your February 26, 2015 notice about the April 28, 2015 oral 

argument, this is to inform you that Craig Haynes will present argument on behalf of 

Appellees. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ Scott P. Stolley 

 Scott P. Stolley 

SPS:clm

cc: Nina Cortell – via e-mail delivery 

 Jeremy D. Kernodle – via e-mail delivery 

 D. Patrick Long – via e-mail delivery 

 William D. White – via e-mail delivery 

519499 000002 14702015.1

ACCEPTED

05-14-00353-CV

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

4/14/2015 2:30:59 PM

LISA MATZ

CLERK

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 4/14/2015 2:30:59 PM LISA MATZ Clerk
#### GRAY *v.*COOPER.

Practice — trespass—possession—injury to trees.

A declaration in trespass for entering the plaintiff’s close, cutting down, injuring, destroying, and carrying away his timber, and convening it to his own use, held good without an averment, that the plaintiff was *m possession.*

Trespass will lie for injury to trees, &c. and to the fee without alleging the breaking, *Sec.*of the *close.*

Error to the Court of Common Pleas. The plaintiff declared below in trespass. There was a general demurrer to the declaration. On hearing, the court sustained the demurrer and gave a peremptory judgment for the defendant, refusing leave to amend. It is assigned for error that the court erred in both particulars.

*G. Callings,*for the plaintiff in error,

cited 1 *Ch. PI.*162, *n.*3; 2 *Ch. PI.*869.

*S. Brush,*contra,

cited 1 *Ch. PI.*159, 327, 8, 9, 30.

Collett, C. J.

The trespass complained of, is that the defendant cut down and destroyed the trees of the plaintiff, and carried them *501away and converted them to his use. This the demurrer admits is true. The allegation is equivalent to asserting in direct terms, that the trees so cut down, destroyed and converted, were the property of the plaintiff. Trespass will lie for injury to the trees of the plaintiff, without alleging a trespass for breaking and entering the close, the party is not bound to declare for that injury also, without he chooses. This declaration for injury to trees, is in substantial conformity with the precedent in common use. 2 *Ch. P.*869. We think the Common Pleas erred in adjudging it insufficient, and for that error reverse the proceedings since the making up the issue, with costs, and remand the cause for further proceedings.