alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.3

# LEASE AMENDMENT ONE

This Lease Amendment One, dated as of April 28, 2000 (Amendment One), between
Ryan Companies US, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (Landlord) and D56, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
(Tenant).

WITNESSETH,that:

WHEREAS, Landlord and
Tenant have entered into a Lease dated April 14, 1999 (Lease) whereby Landlord has leased to Tenant certain premises, located at
Wilfred Lane North and Commerce Boulevard in the City of Rogers, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, consisting of the
Premises, as such Premises are defined in the Lease; and

WHEREAS, Landlord
and Tenant desire and intend to amend the Lease as specifically hereinafter set forth and provided;

NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, Landlord and Tenant hereby agree that:

| | 1. |  | Commencement date of the Lease shall be November 1, 1999.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. |  | The address of the Premises shall be 13201 Wilfred Lane North, as
per the City of Rogers, Minnesota.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 3. |  | The Final Total Project Cost per paragraph 2.1 of Exhibit C of the
Lease will be $12,900,744.00.
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 4. |  | The Initial Annual Base Rent (IABR) per paragraph 2.2 of Exhibit C
of the Lease will be $1,299,104.92(Final Total Project Cost x 0.1007)
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 5. |  | Monthly Base rent for the initial term of the Lease will be as follows:
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Month 1  60 (November 1, 1999  October 31, 2004) $108,258.74
Per the Lease, Exhibit C,
Paragraph 2.3(a), no base rent shall be due and payable through the last day of November
1999.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Month 61  123 (November 1, 2004  January 31, 2010) $119,647.56
         Annual Base Rent = (IABR x 1.1052) = $1,435,770.76
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXCEPT as expressly
amended or supplemented herein, the Lease as amended shall remain and continue in full force and effect in all respects.

---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this First Amendment is hereby executed and delivered effective as of the date and year first above written.

LANDLORD:

RYAN COMPANIES US, INC.

|BY:  | /s/   John P. Kelly Jr. | 
|---- | ----------------------- | 
|     |                        
|    
|Its: | Vice President          | 
|     |                        

TENANT:

D56, INC.

|BY:  | Robert S. Rose | 
|---- | -------------- | 
|     |               
|    
|Its: | Vice President | 
|     |               

---
Exhibit A

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2340-1 Filed:02/01/18 Entered:02/01/18 17:53:41 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 4


Partial Transcript of the Session of the Senate of Puerto Rico, held on January 25, 

2017

Following are statements by President of the Senate, Thomas Rivera-Schatz, 

during floor discussions of Senate Joint Resolution 196.

We must examine what caused the Authority’s financial crisis. I requested the 

information on the status of payments to the Authority by the agencies of the 

government of Puerto Rico, which are commanded by the governor. I am asking the 

governor, with the same eagerness he has asked from us, to request his heads of 

agencies to pay their bills to PREPA. This Legislative Assembly approved a budget 

which included the resources needed to pay the costs of energy and potable water, and 

some heads of agencies do not want to pay or are not paying with the corresponding 

frequency and diligence, and that is in the hands of our governor. It is his duty to 

ensure that the heads of the agencies, the secretaries, the executive directors and the 

members of his cabinet, pay, which they are not doing. It is also the duty of the mayors 

to fulfill their responsibility to pay for the electric service. So that you have an idea of 

what is owed as of December 31 by the corporations of the government of Puerto Rico, 

Aqueducts [PRASA] owes $63 million to PREPA; the Medical Services Administration 

[ASES] owes $32 million; the Port Authority owes $29 million; the Urban Train 

Administration owes $30 million; The Highway and Transportation Authority owes $16 

million; the Cardiovascular Hospital of Puerto Rico owes $13 million; University Medical 

Services owes $9 million; AMA owes $7 million; Housing Authority owes $7.7 million; 

and the Solid Waste Authority owes $4.4 million. Just these 10 agencies owe $212 

million to PREPA. It is the duty of the Executive to tell the persons who command these 

corporations to pay, and it is the duty of PREPA’s directors to demand payment. In the 

case of the executive agencies, the Sports and Recreation Department owes $4 million; 

the Cultural Institute owes $2.4 million; the Health Department University Hospital owes 

$1.8 million; Courts Administration owes $2.6 million; Health Department Administrative 

Services owes $2.6 million; AMSCA owes $1.6 million. But the agencies and 

corporations of the government of Puerto Rico and the municipalities are not the only 

ones owing. Federal government instrumentalities also owe: the General Services 

Administration owes more than $2 million; the Army Reserve owes $1.3; the Postal 

Service owes $1 million; the Veterans Center owes almost $3 million. This is in the 

hands of the governor. It is in the hands of PREPA to demand that its creditors, excuse 

me, that its debtors pay. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2340-1 Filed:02/01/18 Entered:02/01/18 17:53:41 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 4 of 4
§ 701.32 Payment on shares by public units and nonmembers. ( a ) *Authority.* A Federal credit union may, to the extent permitted under Section 107(6) of the Act and this section, receive payments on shares, (regular shares, share certificates, and share draft accounts) from public units and political subdivisions thereof (as those terms are defined in § 745.1) and nonmember credit unions, and to the extent permitted under the Act, this section and § 701.34, receive payments on shares (regular shares, share certificates, and share draft accounts) from other nonmembers.
( b ) *Limitations* — ( 1 ) *Aggregate limit on public unit and nonmember shares.* Except as permitted under paragraph (c) of this section, a federal credit union may not receive public unit and nonmember shares in excess of the greater of: ( i ) 50 percent of the net amount of paid-in and unimpaired capital and surplus less any public unit and nonmember shares, as measured at the time of acceptance of each public unit or nonmember share (*i.e.,*
( ii ) $3 million.
( 2 ) *Required due diligence.* Before receiving public unit or nonmember shares that, taken together with any borrowings, exceed 70 percent of paid-in and unimpaired capital and surplus, the board of directors must adopt a specific written plan concerning the intended use of these funds that is consistent with prudent risk management principles.
( c ) The limitations herein do not apply to accounts maintained in accordance with § 701.37 (Treasury Tax and Loan Depositaries; Depositaries and Financial Agents of the Government) and matching funds required by § 705.5(g) (Community Development Revolving Loan Program for Credit Unions). Once a loan granted pursuant to part 705 is repaid, nonmember share deposits accepted to meet the matching requirement are subject to this section.
[54 FR 31184, July 27, 1989, as amended at 54 FR 51384, Dec. 15, 1989; 55 FR 1794, Jan. 19, 1990; 58 FR 21645, Apr. 23, 1993; 59 FR 26102, May 19, 1994; 61 FR 3790, Feb. 2, 1996; 76 FR 67587, Nov. 2, 2011; 77 FR 31991, May 31, 2012; 82 FR 50291, Oct. 30, 2017; 84 FR 58309, Oct. 31, 2019]
```

[110th Congress Public Law 65]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ065.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 568]]

Public Law 110-65
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
11033 South State Street in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``Willye B. White 
     Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Aug. 9, 2007 -  [H.R. 2025]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. WILLYE B. WHITE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11033 South State Street in Chicago, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Willye B. White Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Willye B. 
White Post Office Building''.

    Approved August 9, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2025:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            May 14, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 347.122 Limitations applicable to the authority provided in this subpart.

The FDIC may impose such conditions on authority granted in this subpart as it considers appropriate. If a bank is unable or fails to comply with the requirements of this subpart or any conditions imposed by the FDIC regarding transactions under this subpart, the FDIC may require termination of any activities or divestiture of investments permitted under this subpart after giving the bank notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard on the matter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-2126-000]

Take notice that on April 5, 2000, Central Maine Power Company (CMP), tendered for filing a service agreement for Non-Firm Local Point-to-Point Transmission Service entered into with Enron Energy Services, Inc. Service will be provided pursuant to CMP's Open Access Transmission Tariff, designated rate schedule CMP-FERC Electric, Original Volume No. 3, as supplemented.

CMP respectfully requests that the Commission accept this Service Agreement for filing and requests waiver of the Commission's notice requirements to permit service under the agreement to become effective as of April 1, 2000.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before April 26, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10061  Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### § 703.6 Credit analysis.

A Federal credit union must conduct and document a credit analysis on an investment and the issuing entity before purchasing it, except for investments issued or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by the U.S. government or its agencies, enterprises, or corporations or fully insured (including accumulated interest) by the National Credit Union Administration or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. A Federal credit union must update this analysis at least annually for as long as it holds the investment.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                              ANTS SOFTWARE INC.
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to my knowledge, the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), for the quarter ended June 30, 2003:

      1. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 14, 2003               By: /s/ Kenneth Ruotolo
      ---------------                   -------------------------------------
                                        Kenneth Ruotolo
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ANTs software inc., and will be
retained by ANTs software inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C Section 1350



I, Eric Bello, Chief Financial Officer of Quipp, Inc., a Florida corporation (the Company), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:



(1)

The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

* * *





| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ ERICBELLO          
| |     | Eric Bello             
| |     | Chief Financial Officer



Date:

November 14, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, 

et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF O’NEILL SECURITY & CONSULTANT SERVICES

INC.’S INFORMATIVE MOTION APPEARANCE FOR THE DECEMBER 14–15, 2022, 

OMNIBUS HEARING (DOCKET NO. 23002)

To the Honorable United States District Court Judge Laura Taylor Swain:

COMES NOW O’Neill Security & Consultant Services, Inc. (henceforth O’Neill), 

and respectfully notifies and informs the Court and parties in interest that, because of

Debtor request2 to adjourn to the February 1, 2023 omnibus hearing several matters,

among them the objection of O’Neill’s Claim3, O’Neill is withdrawing its Informative Motion 

Regarding Appearance for the December 14–15, 2022, Omnibus Hearing (Docket No. 

23002).

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the 

last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 

(“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees 

Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 

17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority 

(“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747); and (vi) 

Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK-5523-LTS) (Last Four Digits 

of Federal Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations).

2 See Docket No. 23038. 3 Claim Number 28744.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23042 Filed:12/11/22 Entered:12/11/22 17:42:47 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this date, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System, which will automatically send notification 

of such filing to all attorneys of record.

In Ponce, Puerto Rico, this 11th day of December 2022.

ATTORNEY FOR CREDITOR, O’NEILL

s/Elías L. Fernández Pérez

ELÍAS L. FERNÁNDEZ PÉREZ

USDC 227404

PO Box 7500

Ponce, P.R. 00732

Tel. (939) 250-0179

Cel. (787) 616-9374

Fax: 1(800) 325-7084

Email: eliaslaureano@gmail.com

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23042 Filed:12/11/22 Entered:12/11/22 17:42:47 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3383

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in the Bronx, 

New York, as the ‘‘James J. Peters Department of Veterans Affairs 

Medical Center’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 28, 2003

Mr. SERRANO (for himself, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. BISHOP of New 

York, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. 

HOUGHTON, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. KING of New York, Mrs. KELLY, Mrs. 

LOWEY, Mrs. MALONEY, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. MCHUGH, 

Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. NADLER, Mr. OWENS, Mr. 

QUINN, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. REYNOLDS, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. SWEENEY, 

Mr. TOWNS, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. WALSH, and Mr. WEINER) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center 

in the Bronx, New York, as the ‘‘James J. Peters Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

4 MEDICAL CENTER, BRONX, NEW YORK. 

5 The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center 

6 in the Bronx, New York, shall after the date of the enact-
2

•HR 3383 IH 

1 ment of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘James 

2 J. Peters Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Cen3 ter’’. Any reference to such medical center in any law, reg4 ulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the 

5 United States shall be considered to be a reference to the 

6 James J. Peters Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

7 Center.

Æ
#### John P. Kane, as Executor, Etc., Respondent, *v.*Jennie Reid, Appellant.

.Appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict directed by the court in favor of the plaintiff and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Edmund T. Oldham, for appellant.

J. Woolsey Shepard, for respondent. .

*Per Curiam.*

The only demand available to plaintiff is the one of October 29, 1898. Plaintiff must rely on his final assertion of *803ownership, instanced hy his final demand. This was on October 29, 1898. That he had not abandoned his title on October 22, is shown by his letter to Rogers on October 26, and that he had not abandoned his title on October 26, is shown by his retention of title involved in his demand for possession on the twenty-ninth. The property consisted of gas chandeliers, brackets and appliances and gas logs, affixed to the premises by the plaintiff, left there by the plaintiff, and a deed of the premises delivered to the defendant without one word being said to the defendant. Under the circumstances we agree with the learned counsel for the appellant, that it was a question for the jury to determine, whether the making of a demand for the return of these articles at 5 o’clock in the afternoon of Saturday, October twenty-ninth, was a demand at a proper time and in a proper manner. The defendant says that she told the plaintiff’s representative upon the demand being made, “ That she could not be left in darkness Saturday and Sunday nights, but that he could have them on Monday morning,” and under this evidence it was the duty of the court to submit the question of the reasonableness of this demand to the jury, and the refusal to do so is error, requiring the reversal of the judgment. We are also agreed upon the appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial that the question of value should have been submitted and this error may be cured on such appeal.

The judgment and order appealed from must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Present: McCarthy and O’Dwyeb, JJ.

'Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.