alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3202

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require that employers of members 

of the National Guard and the reserve components of the Armed Forces 

who are called to active duty continue to offer health care coverage 

for dependents of such members, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 

Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require that 

employers of members of the National Guard and the 

reserve components of the Armed Forces who are called 

to active duty continue to offer health care coverage 

for dependents of such members, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reservist Health Care 

5 Continuity Act’’. 
2

•HR 3202 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EMPLOYER HEALTH CARE COV2 ERAGE FOR ENTIRE PERIOD OF ABSENCE 

3 FOR DEPENDENTS OF NATIONAL GUARDS4 MEN AND RESERVISTS CALLED TO ACTIVE 

5 DUTY. 

6 Section 4317(a)(1)(A) of title 38, United States 

7 Code, is amended—

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘(i) in the case of an employer 

9 with 20 or fewer employees’’ after ‘‘(A)’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

11 clause: 

12 ‘‘(ii) in the case of an employer with more than 

13 20 employees, the period of such absence; or’’. 

14 SEC. 3. REQUIREMENT FOR GOVERNMENT REIMBURSE15 MENT FOR EMPLOYER SHARE OF HEALTH 

16 CARE PREMIUMS. 

17 Section 4317(a) of such title is further amended by 

18 adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

19 ‘‘(4) The Secretary of Defense shall reimburse an em20 ployer for the employer share of any premiums for health 

21 care coverage provided pursuant to this section to a person 

22 performing service in the uniformed services for each 

23 month during the period of such service.’’.

Æ
# Official Journal L 134/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 134 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5924 May 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 134

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5924 May 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2016/788 of 1 October 2014 on the State aid SA.32833 (11/C) (ex 11/NN) implemented by Germany concerning the financing arrangements for Frankfurt Hahn airport put into place in 2009 to 2011
  (notified under document C(2014) 6850)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2016/789 of 1 October 2014 on the State aid SA.21121 (C29/08) (ex NN 54/07) implemented by Germany concerning the financing of Frankfurt Hahn airport and the financial relations between the airport and Ryanair
  (notified under document C(2014) 6853)

   (
  1
  ) | 46 |
| | * | Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2016/790 of 13 January 2016 amending Annex V to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the evidence of formal qualifications and the titles of training courses
  (notified under document C(2016) 1)

   (
  1
  ) | 135 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2016/788 of 1 October 2014 on the State aid SA.32833 (11/C) (ex 11/NN) implemented by Germany concerning the financing arrangements for Frankfurt Hahn airport put into place in 2009 to 2011
  (notified under document C(2014) 6850)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2014) 6850)

1

1

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2016/789 of 1 October 2014 on the State aid SA.21121 (C29/08) (ex NN 54/07) implemented by Germany concerning the financing of Frankfurt Hahn airport and the financial relations between the airport and Ryanair
  (notified under document C(2014) 6853)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2014) 6853)

1

46

*

Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2016/790 of 13 January 2016 amending Annex V to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the evidence of formal qualifications and the titles of training courses
  (notified under document C(2016) 1)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2016) 1)

1

135

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### § 622.17 Decision of the Board.

Any person who has not engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions in the case, or in a factually related case, may advise and assist the Board in the consideration of the case. Copies of the decision and order of the Board shall be served upon the parties. A copy of the order will also be sent to the supervisory bank if the order relates to a System association, director, officer, or other person participating in the conduct of the affairs of the association.
EXHIBIT 32.2

 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") of ANTs software
inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the period ended September 30,
2008:

1. Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

            This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and
is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be "filed"
for any purpose whatsoever.

Date:    November 10, 2008

                          /s/    Kenneth Ruotolo
                          -------------------------------------------------
                          Kenneth Ruotolo, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be
retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request.
#### COELAND’S ADMINISTRATOR *v.*REESE.

Sci. fa. to make administrator party to a judgment — interest.

Where part of a judgment at law is enjoined, the remainder is as if the judgment was originally for the sum not enjoined, and draws interest from the date of the judgment.

An administrator may revive a judgment recovered by his intestate for the sum due, and be made a party to it.

Scire facias to make the administrator party to a judgment recovered by his intestate in his life time. Pleas, 1. Nul tiel record: 2. notice that the defendant in the life time of Copeland obtained a decree in chancery, enjoining him from collecting more than $450 of said judgment, and that since said injunction the defendant had paid the $450 in full.

Irvin, for the plaintiff.

Hunter, for the defendant,

insisted that no more could be collected on the judgment than the $450, without interest, because the injunction restrained them from collecting more than $450; but if interest were to be allowed, it could only be counted from the date of the injunction, not from the judgment.

By the Court.

The injunction left the sum of $450 of the *original*judgment to be collected and operated to satisfy the residue of the judgment. It remained as if originally entered for $450 only, and that sum drew interest from the date of the judgment.

There is found to be now due on the judgment $201, principal and interest. Judgment, that the administrator be made party to the judgment, and have execution for said sum and costs.
Veolia partial outreach list Kathy Andria Kathy Andria to: Andrea Morgan 08/27/2012 02:54 PM

Cc: David Ogulei, Genevieve Damico, Jane Woolums, Amy Funk

, "Elizabeth J. Hubertz"

Andrea et al: Below is a list, certainly not complete, of suggested contacts for the outreach list for Veolia’s sigmod permit. All of the names I’ve previously given, including Amy Funk, Kat Logan, Liz Hubertz "Elizabeth J. Hubertz" < ejhubertz@wulaw.wustl.edu >, Verena Owen and David Bender

The City of St. Louis

City of East St. Louis—mayor’s office and fire chief

Village of Sauget Village of Cahokia East St. Louis Churches c/o ministers, many of which can be found at http://www.stlouischurches.org/Category/South-St-Louis-IL-Churches/East-St-Louis-IL-Churche s-62207/

East-West Gateway Air Quality Advisory Cmte Mike Coulson "Mike Coulson" mike.coulson@ewgateway.org Carol Lawrence carol.lawrence@ewgateway.org

Rob Kaleel, LADCO, kaleel@ladco.org

Jeff Benbenek IEPA jeff .benbenek@illinois.gov Ken Page, IEPA EJ Officer "Page, Ken" ken.page@illinois.gov

Shirley Schultz, Metro East Asthma group, sschultz@memhosp.com

Barb Hohlt, St. Clair County Health District "Barb Hohlt" barb.hohlt@co.st-clair.il.us

,

Doug King, East Side Health District, ESL

Richard Ellerbrake, "Richard Ellerbrake" rellerbrake@att.net

Barbara Levin, ESL University Collaborative blevin@wustl.edu

Jack Norman jmnorman @htc.net

Missouri Coalition for the Environment--Kat LoganMetro East Community Air Project--Amy Funk

Sierra Club, Missouri Chapter John Hickey Chapter Director John.Hickey@sierraclub.org Sierra Club, Illinois, Kaskaskia Group "Wojtkowski, Dale" wojo@wisperhome.com

I don’t have an updated list of community organizations in East St . Louis, but they should certainly be added, as should those in St. Louis.

I also suggest that you contact Ken Bardo and Dave Novak of EPA who compiled outreach lists for Solutia/Sauget Superfund site and the ESL Alcoa site .

Newspapers should include St. Louis Post-Dispatch ( jtomich @post-dispatch.com and pgauen@post-dispatch.com ) Belleville News-Democrat, The St. Louis American, East St. Louis
Monitor.

Kathy

Kathy Andria American Bottom Conservancy
# Amtsblatt C 463I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 463I |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 64. Jahrgang16. November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 463I

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

64. Jahrgang16. November 2021

---

| Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informationen |
| | INFORMATIONEN DER ORGANE, EINRICHTUNGEN UND SONSTIGEN STELLEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION |
| | Europäische Kommission |
| 2021/C 463 I/01 | Ernennung eines Anhörungsbeauftragten in bestimmten Wettbewerbsverfahren | 1 |

Inhalt

Seite

IV   Informationen

INFORMATIONEN DER ORGANE, EINRICHTUNGEN UND SONSTIGEN STELLEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION

Europäische Kommission

2021/C 463 I/01

Ernennung eines Anhörungsbeauftragten in bestimmten Wettbewerbsverfahren

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

IV Informationen

INFORMATIONEN DER ORGANE, EINRICHTUNGEN UND SONSTIGEN STELLEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION

Europäische Kommission

| 16.11.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CI 463/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CI 463/1

---

Ernennung eines Anhörungsbeauftragten in bestimmten Wettbewerbsverfahren

(2021/C 463 I/01)

Nach der Versetzung von Herrn Wouter WILS hat die Kommission Herrn Eric GIPPINI FOURNIER mit Wirkung vom 1. Dezember 2021 gemäß dem Beschluss des Präsidenten der Europäischen Kommission vom 13. Oktober 2011 über Funktion und Mandat des Anhörungsbeauftragten in bestimmten Wettbewerbsverfahren zum Anhörungsbeauftragten ernannt (ABl. L 275 vom 20.10.2011, S. 29).

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24870]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; ``Population Genetics Analysis 
Program: Immunity to Vaccines/Infections''.
    Date: November 12, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Renaissance M Street Hotel, 1143 New Hampshire Avenue, 
NW., Mount Vernon Room, Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Katrin Eichelberg, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2899, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2348464a404b464f41465144634d4a424a470d4d4a4b0d444c55"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97fcf2fef4fff2fbf5f2e5f0d7f9fef6fef3b9f9feffb9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 8, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-24870 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### IN THE CO URT OF APPEALS OF TE NNE SS EE AT KNOX VILLE

TI MOTH Y C. RUSSELL, v . SUZ ANNE COLET TE LANDRY LYUBI MOV

C i r c u i t C o u r t f

o r S e v i e r C o u n t y N o . 2 0 0 5

- 0 6 7 4

- 1 H o n . B e n W

. H o o p e r , I I

. , J u d g e

N o . E 2 0 1 0

- 0 2 5 4 1

- C O A

- R 3

- C V

- F I L E D

- M A Y 2 6 , 2 0 1 1

T e n n . R

. A p p . P

. 3 A p p e a l a s o f R i g h t ; A p p e a l D i s m i s s e d

.

H E R S C H E L P IC K E N S F R A N K S , P

. J

. , C H A R LE S D

. S U S A N O , J R

. , J

. , a n d D

. M IC H A E L S W IN E Y , J

.

T i m o t h y R u s s e l l
, H i x s o n , T e n n e s s e e , p r o s e

.

D e n n i s C

. C a m p b e l l
, S e v i e r v i l l e , T e n n e s s e e , f o r t h e a p p e l l e e , S u z a n n e C o l e t t e L a n d r y L y u b i m o v

.

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 1

O n M a y 2
, 2 0 1 1
, a s h o w c a u s e o r d e r w a s e n t e r e d i n t h i s c a s e , d i r e c t i n g a p p e l l a n t t o

s h o w c a u s e w h y t h e a p p e a l s h o u l d n o t b e d i s m i s s e d f o r l a c k o f j u r i s d i c t i o n

. A p p e l l a n t

T he Co urt of

Appe al s' Rul es pro vide: 1

Rule 10. Me m ora ndum Opini on

(b) T his C o u r t , wit h the con cur re nce of al l j udges par ti ci pat ing in the cas e, m ay af fi rm,

re verse or m odi fy the act ion s of the tr ia l cou rt by m emorand um opi nio n when a for m al opi nio n woul d have

no pre ced ent ia l value. Wh en a cas e is dec ide d by m emorand um opi nio n i t s h a l l be des ignat ed "M EMORANDUM OPI

NI ON," sha ll not be publ is hed
, and sha ll not be ci te d or re li ed on for any re aso n in
any unr el at ed c ase

.r e s p o n d e d t o t h e s h o w c a u s e o r d e r , b u t t h e a r g u m e n t i n t h e r e s p o n s e d o e s n o t e s t a b l i s h g o o d

c a u s e f o r m a i n t a i n i n g t h i s c a s e i n t h i s c o u r t

. T h e O r d e r e n t e r e d b y t h e T r i a l J u d g e o n N o v e m b e r 8
, 2 0 1 0
, d e m o n s t r a t e s t h a t t h e r e a r e i s s u e s y e t t o b e r e s o l v e d i n t h e T r i a l C o u r t b e f o r e a T e n n

. R

. A p p

. P

. 3
, a p p e a l w i l l l i e

. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e a p p e a l i s d i s m i s s e d a n d t h e

c o s t o f t h e a p p e a l i s a s s e s s e d t o T i m o t h y C

. R u s s e l l

.

P E R C U R I A M

-2-
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  33-79020)  pertaining  to the 1994 Stock  Option  Plan of Human  Genome
Sciences,  Inc. of our report  dated  February  23,  1998,  with  respect to the
financial  statements of Human Genome Sciences,  Inc.  included in the Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Vienna, Virginia
March 27, 1998
EXHIBIT 21. LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF CHELL GROUP CORPORATION AS AT MAY 31, 2003

Name of Subsidiary(1)                            Jurisdiction of Incorporation

Chell Merchant Capital Group, Inc......................................Ontario
Logicorp Data Systems Ltd. (2) ........................................Alberta
Logicorp Service Group Ltd. (2) .......................................Alberta
123557 Alberta Ltd. (2) ...............................................Alberta
591360 Alberta Ltd. (2) ...............................................Alberta
eTelligent Solutions Inc. (3) .........................................Alberta
NTN Interactive Network Inc.............................................Canada
1113659 Ontario Ltd. ("Viewer Services) (4)............................Ontario
3484751 Canada Inc......................................................Canada
Chell.com (USA) Ltd.....................................................Nevada

----------

NOTES:

      (1)   Unless otherwise indicated, all named entities are wholly-owned
            subsidiaries of Chell Group Corporation.
      (2)   Wholly-owned subsidiary of Chell Merchant Capital Group.
      (3)   Wholly-owned subsidiary of Logicorp Data Systems Ltd...
      (4)   Wholly-owned subsidiary of NTN Interactive Network Inc.
#### § 7.1009 [Reserved]
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-40077

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Valentin Hernandez-Colunga, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:20-CR-1189-1

Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Valentin 

Hernandez-Colunga has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Colunga has not filed a 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 27, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-40077 Document: 00515954574 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/27/2021
No. 21-40077

2

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-40077 Document: 00515954574 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/27/2021
#### BRYANS *v.*TAYLOR, THE FARMER’S AND MECHANIC’S BANK OF CINCINNATI, ET AL.

Judgment creditor — confiscation of a debt due from a third person — attorney’s authority-practice.

A judgment creditor who has taken out execution without satisfaction, may confiscate a debt due his debtor in chancery.

A fact not denied in the answer, the defendant will not be permitted to question at the hearing.

The court will not aid a stranger to a judgment to question the authority of the attorney entering it.

Chancery. The case is fully stated in the opinion of the Court.

Wright, J.

The complainants allege that they have recovered a judgment at law against the Farmer’s and Mechanic’s Bank; have taken’out execution, which has been returned nulla bona; that Taylor and the other defendants are debtors of the bank, and seeks to confiscate so much of those debts for the satisfaction of their judg-. ment as may be necessary for that purpose.

*246Taylor has answered. He does not deny the judgment, execution, or return. But he now objects that the evidence does not sustain the bill, because the bill alleges the judgment to be the Farmer’s and Mechanic’s *Bank of Cincinnati,*while the record is the *Farmer’s and Mechanic’s Bank,*without the words ‘of Cincinnati.’ Whatever force there may have been in this objection, if it had been properly made, it is sufficient now to say, that this respondent has hot denied the allegation of the bill in this particular, and that part may be taken as confessed. It is urged further, that the judgment is *void,*because it appears by the record, that the process was *served*on A. B. *late*president, &c. It appears on the record, that the bank appeared by counsel in the suit, before judgment was rendered, and this cures the defect of service. But it is further objected that the attorney was *not authorized*to appear; and evidence is taken that the attorney does not recollect of his being specially employed in that case. The attorney was the president of the bank, and in such a case, we are not disposed to aid a stranger to the record and judgment, to call in question the authority of the attorney for the defendants, at this time, and in this way.

The proof shows the defendant, Taylor, indebted to the bank in .a larger amount than the unsatisfied judgment of the complainants, and therefore, it is decreed that he pay the amount of the said judgment and interest, and the costs of this suit, not exceeding one hundred dollars, within sixty days, or that the complainants have execution therefor; and that the bank be perpetually enjoined from again collecting the .sum so paid or collected by Taylor, and pass the amount to his credit on the books of the bank, on the obligations against him held by the bank. As to the other defendants, the bill is dismissed, at the costs of the complainants.