alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022069EN.01001201.xml

| 10.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/12

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 10 November 2021

in Case E-17/20

Zvonimir Cogelja v the Directorate of Health (Embætti landlæknis),

(Free movement of persons and services – Directive 2005/36/EC – Evidence of formal qualifications – Issuance of evidence – Competent authority)

(2022/C 69/12)

In Case E-17/20, Zvonimir Cogelja v the Directorate of Health (Embætti landlæknis) – REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by Reykjavík District Court (Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur) concerning the interpretation of Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, and in particular Article 25, in conjunction with Articles 3(1)(c), 21 and 26 of that directive, as adapted to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Bernd Hammermann, Judges, gave judgment on 10 November 2021, the operative part of which is as follows:

In order for the competent authority of an EEA State to issue evidence of formal qualifications for specialist medical training in compliance with Article 25 of Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, it must be able to assess and confirm that the requirements for issuing the evidence of formal qualifications are fulfilled. This is possible if the EEA State offers specialist medical training that fulfils the minimum requirements under Directive 2005/36/EC within its own territory. Otherwise, that competent authority must have in place a system that secures the verification of compliance with the requirements laid down in Article 25 of Directive 2005/36/EC, for example by having in place a curriculum or its equivalent describing a comprehensive programme of education and training. If not, that competent authority may not issue such evidence of formal qualifications under Directive 2005/36/EC.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.87

                                  AMENDMENT 1:

                               RESELLER AGREEMENT

                                     BETWEEN

                                 EMC CORPORATION

                                       AND

                           MTI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

MTI Reseller Agreement - Amendment 1
CONFIDENTIAL

                                                                               1
<PAGE>

Pursuant to section 18.8 of the Reseller Agreement between EMC Corporation and
MTI Technology Corporation (the "Agreement"), EMC and Reseller hereby agree to
the following amendments to the Agreement.

WHEREAS, EMC and Reseller wish to extend the initial term of the Agreement from
three (3) years to six (6) commencing on the Effective Date; and

WHEREAS, EMC and Reseller wish to make a rebate available to Reseller under the
circumstances below;

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valid consideration, the parties agree as follows:

1.    The first line of section 3.1 shall be amended as follows: the word "three
(3)" shall be replaced by the word "six (6)". No other changes shall be made to
the terms of section 3.

2.    The following Section 7.3 shall be added to the Agreement:

      "7.3 REBATE OPPORTUNITY. Effective February 1, 2004. Reseller shall
      receive a rebate of four (4) percent off the net price invoiced to MTI,
      for Clariion Equipment purchased by Reseller from EMC. Provided, however,
      that this rebate opportunity does not apply to any sales of Clariion
      Equipment on which maintenance services are provided by EMC. This rebate
      shall be earned quarterly, and payable at the end of the relevant quarter
      by the issuance of a credit by EMC to Reseller, which credit shall offset
      amounts owed by Reseller to EMC. In addition, for purposes of calculating
      co-op funds pursuant to Exhibit A-5 hereto, the amount of such rebate
      credits shall be deducted from the Reseller's net revenue."

Agreed by the parties:

EMC Corporation ("EMC")                MTI Technology Corporation ("Reseller")

By: Gregory Ambulof                    By: /s/ Thomas R. Raimondi, Jr.
--------------------------                -------------------------------------
Name: Gregory Ambulof                  Name: Thomas R. Raimondi, Jr.

Title: VP Channel Sales                Title: Chairman Of the Board and CEO

Date: 3/26/04                          Date: 3/25/04

MTI Reseller Agreement - Amendment 1                                          2
CONFIDENTIAL
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Annual Report of Aldila, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of Aldila, Inc. herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Aldila, Inc.
| /s/  Peter R. Mathewson |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Peter R. Mathewson      |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ Robert J. Cierzan   |   |
| Robert J. Cierzan       |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                         |        |  |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aldila, Inc. andwill be retained by Aldila, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

March 14, 2007

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                    $ 2,566,115
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               5,008,603
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            7,773,527
<PP&E>                                     20,124,480
<DEPRECIATION>                             12,768,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             15,437,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       4,179,922
<BONDS>                                       967,695
<COMMON>                                   13,833,965
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,319,555)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               15,437,143
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            5,404,632
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               5,342,824
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (13,912)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             77,101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,205)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   37,382
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (66,587)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (66,587)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D . C . 

### V\'E^- AOF

' 1 - ! Ai

r O M

Motio no f EXECUTIV E AIRLINES , INC . d/b/ a AMERICANEAGL E fo r confidentia l treatmen t unde r Rul e 1 2 (Form

41 , Schedul e B-43 ) DOT-OST-1996
- 158 7

MOTIO NO F EXECUTIV E AIRLINES , INC . d/b/ a AMERICA NEAGL E FO RCONFIDENTIA L TREATMEN T UNDE RRUL E 1 2 Executiv e Airlines , Inc . d/b/ a America nEagle , unde r 1 ^ CF R302.12 , herebymove s tha t it s For m41 , Schedul e B-4 3 fo r YE201 0 b e accorde d confidentia l treatmen t an db e withhel dfrom publi c disclosure . Th e informatio nfo r whic hconfidentia l treatmen t i s requeste d pertain s t o Executive' s airframe s and aircraf t engin e acquisition s an dretirements .

I naccordanc e wit hth e Department' s Fina l Rul e o nSub
mittin g Airlin e Dat a vi a th e Internet , 7 5 Fed . Reg . 41580 , 41582 , w e ar e uploadin g ou r confidentia l repor t electronicall y t o th e fo l lowin g websit e : hL u p : //j^~:ub:n ii
. 111 a . •loi. . qr.^ v O nJun e 5 , 1995 , Jame s W . Mitchell , Director , Offic e o f Airlin e Statistics , grante dconfidentia l treatmen t fo r a 10
- yea r perio d t o simila r dat a file db yAmerica nAirlines . Fo r th e reason s state d i nMr . Mitchell' s letter , th e Departmen t shoul d gran t th e sam e relie f here .- 2 -
WHEREFORE , Executiv e move s tha t it s B-4 3 fo r YE201 0 b e withhel d fro m

publi c disclosur e unde r Rul e 1 2 fo r a perio d o f 1 0 years . Respectfull ysubmitted . 

# GJi^ M

y« o
CAR LB . NELSO N Associat e Genera l Counse l America nAirlines , Inc . O nbehal f o f Executiv e Airlines , Inc . d/b/ a America nEagl e Marc h30 , 201 1
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22657 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/20/22 18:40:40 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.01

  Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 and in connection  with the annual report on
Form 10-K of Delta and Pine Land  Company for the fiscal  year ended  August 31,
2004, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  the undersigned W. Thomas  Jagodinski,  the President and Chief
Executive  Officer,   hereby  certifies  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of Delta and Pine
Land Company.

  Signature                      Title                          Date

/s/ W. Thomas Jagodinski   President, Chief Executive Officer  November 15, 2004
------------------------   and Director
W. Thomas Jagodinski       (Principal Executive Officer)
###### Editorial Note on Part 747

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 747.16 The NCUA's right to conduct examination.

Nothing contained in this subpart limits in any manner the right of the NCUA to conduct any examination, inspection, or visitation of any institution or institution-affiliated party, or the right of the NCUA to conduct or continue any form of investigation authorized by law.
Exhibit 32 (i)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the
quarter ended September 30, 2004, I, James G. Rakes, President and Chief
Executive Officer of National Bankshares, Inc. (Principal Executive Officer),
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

        (2)the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.



/s/ JAMES G. RAKES
--------------------
James G. Rakes
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22852-2 

Env
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 12.1

                 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Calculation
                          (Dollar Amounts in Thousands)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Fiscal Year(a)
                                          -----------------------------------------------------
                                            1993       1994       1995       1996       1997
                                          ---------  ---------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                        <C>          <C>      <C>          <C>       <C>   
Earning to fixed charges:
    Earnings:
      Pre-tax income from continuing       (1,029)      6,202    (5,953)      5,036     13,899
        operations
      Add fixed charges                     17,569     18,463     20,792     20,042     21,085
      Subtract capitalized interest in       (639)      (538)      (430)      (621)      (429)
        fixed charges
                                          ---------  ---------   --------   --------   --------
    Earnings                                15,901     24,127     14,409     24,457     34,555
                                          ---------  ---------   --------   --------   --------
    Fixed charges:
                                                                             11,482     12,442
      Net interest expense per financial    11,793     11,712     12,347
        statement
      Add:
         Interest income                         -          -          -          -          -
         Rents (1/3)                         5,776      6,751      8,445      8,560      8,643
                                          ---------  ---------   --------   --------   --------
    Fixed charges                           17,569     18,463     20,792     20,042     21,085
                                          ---------  ---------   --------   --------   --------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(b)           -        1.3          -        1.2        1.6

</TABLE>



(a)      The Company's fiscal year is a 52 or 53 week year ending on the Sunday
         closest to the calendar year end. All fiscal years presented consist of
         52 weeks.

(b)      Earnings and fixed charges were insufficient to cover fixed charges by
         approximately $1,668 and $6,383 for fiscal years 1993 and 1995,
         respectively.
ANEXO A 

Relación de reclamaciones objeto de la Quingentésima trigésima novena objeción global 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22743-2 Filed:10/28/22 Entered:10/28/22 18:06:26 Desc:

Anexo A Page 1 of 2
Quingentésima Trigésima Novena Objeción Global

Anexo A: Reclamos Satisfechos

NOMBRE

FECHA DE 

PRESENTACIÓN DEUDOR

N.o DE 

RECLAMACIÓN

MONTO DE LA 

RECLAMACIÓN 

ALEGADA

NÚMERO DE 

CASO

11/01/2017 17 BK 03283-LTS El Estado Libre Asociado de 264

Puerto Rico

 1 HERNANDEZ CASTRODAD, FIDECICOMISO

HC-06 BOX 72502

CAGUAS, PR 00725

$28,750.00

Base para: La o las facturas que ascienden a un total de 28,750.00 se pagaron mediante cheques identificados con los números 00025421, 00026612, 00028836 y 00033381 los días 

6/6/2017, 22/06/2017, 10/8/2017 y 6/12/2017.

06/29/2018 17 BK 03283-LTS El Estado Libre Asociado de 134695-1

Puerto Rico

 2 RODRIGUEZ GONZALEZ, NATIVIDAD

PO BOX 623

ISABELA, PR 00662

Indeterminado*

Base para: La Evidencia de Reclamo invoca un reembolso de un reclamo por una reserva en el Centro Vacacional de Boquerón. Según los registros del Departamento de Recursos 

Naturales y Medioambientales, existe un crédito por $345, emitido el 8/1/2022. Una parte de este reclamo se le transfirió al proceso de Reconciliación de Reclamos Administrativos 

(RRA) y se resolverá de acuerdo con sus procedimientos. Dado que esta objeción no constituye una objeción a la parte del reclamo en el proceso de la ACR, los Deudores se reservan 

el derecho de objetar la parte restante del reclamo fundándose en cualquier otro motivo.

TOTAL $28,750.00*

* Indica que la reclamación contiene montos por liquidar o indeterminados 1

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22743-2 Filed:10/28/22 Entered:10/28/22 18:06:26 Desc:

Anexo A Page 2 of 2
§ 621.31 Non-audit services. Non-audit services are any professional services provided by a qualified public accountant during the period of an audit engagement which are not connected to an audit or review of an institution's financial statements. ( a ) A qualified public accountant engaged to conduct a Farm Credit institution's audit may not perform the following non-audit services for that institution: ( 1 ) Bookkeeping,
( 2 ) Financial information systems design,
( 3 ) Appraisal and valuation services,
( 4 ) Actuarial services,
( 5 ) Internal audit outsourcing services,
( 6 ) Management or human resources functions,
( 7 ) Legal and expert services unrelated to the audit, and
( 8 ) Advocating an institution's interests in litigation, regulatory or administrative investigations and proceedings unrelated to external audit work.
( b ) A qualified public accountant engaged to conduct a Farm Credit institution's audit may only perform non-audit services, not otherwise prohibited in this section, if the institution's audit committee pre-approves the services and the services are fully disclosed in the annual report.
#### THE TRUSTEES OF SCHOOL SECTION, MARIETTA, *v.*HOUGH.

Certiorari — school section — re-appraisement—error.

When school lands in Marietta have been leased for ninety-nine years, and part assigned, a re-appraisement of the whole tract, *by the*acre, is prima facie an appraisement of *each*acre in the tract, and sufficient foundation upon which to assess the *rent*against the assignee of part of the tract.

If in such case the appraisement was not in fact by the *acre¡*or was otherwise illegal, that is matter of defence to be brought forward by the defendant.

Judgment rendered upon such matter in favor of a defendant without plea or evidence, is erroneous.

Certiorari. ■ By the return it appeared that by legislative act the town council of Marietta was empowered to divide their school section into small tracts, and give leases for ninety-nine years, renewable forever, reserving a rent of six per cent, per annum upon the appraised value, and subjecting the lots so leased to re-appraisement every ten years. The law also provides that in case of assignments by the lessee of part of a leased lot, and notice given thereof to the council, that they shall assess the rent of the part assigned to the assignee, and re-appraise to him in order to collect the rent from *161him. The plaintiffs had proceeded upon a lease of two lots, and an assignment of part of each to the defendant as assignee; they showed a re-appraisement of each entire lot, and an assessment upon the defendant of his moiety of the rent under the re-appraisement. Upon this they claimed to recover the amount of such moiety of rent of the defendant, but the court below decided the re-appraisement was void, and gave judgment for the defendant — to reverse which, this certiorari was sued out.

*Vinton,*for the defendant in error,

insisted that the re-appraisement was invalid because it was made of the entire two lots, by the acre, and not of the separate moiety held by the defendant, and therefore that the judgment of the court below was right.

*Nye,*for the plaintiff in error.

Bt the Court.

The appraisement of the whoje tract, *by the acre,*is prima facie an appraisement of *each acre.*If not so in fact, or the re-appraisement was otherwise illegal, that was matter of defence to be *brought*forward *by the*defendant, by plea, or by evidence at the trial. As there was no such defence in the court below, either upon plea or otherwise, it appears to us the conclusion of the court below was erroneous.

The judgment below is reversed, and the cause remanded for future proceedings.
# C_2021343EN.01002501.xml

| 26.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/25

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 343/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 11 May 2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 86811 |
| Decision No | 039/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Iceland |
| Title | COVID-19 amendments to the digital gift voucher scheme |
| Legal basis | Legislative act Amending Act No 54/2020 on Digital Vouchers (lög um ferðagjöf) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | To increase domestic demand for tourist services, thereby benefitting the tourist service sector |
| Form of aid | Grants (indirect aid) |
| Budget | ISK 1.4 billion |
| Duration | 1 June 2021 to 31 August 2021 |
| Economic sectors | Tourism |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs |
| Arnarhvoli við Lindargötu |
| 101 Reykjavík |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

11 May 2021

Case No

86811

Decision No

039/21/COL

EFTA State

Iceland

Title

COVID-19 amendments to the digital gift voucher scheme

Legal basis

Legislative act Amending Act No 54/2020 on Digital Vouchers (lög um ferðagjöf)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

To increase domestic demand for tourist services, thereby benefitting the tourist service sector

Form of aid

Grants (indirect aid)

Budget

ISK 1.4 billion

Duration

1 June 2021 to 31 August 2021

Economic sectors

Tourism

Name and address of the granting authority

The Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs

Arnarhvoli við Lindargötu

101 Reykjavík

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3393

To amend title 40, United States Code, to add Catawba and Cleveland 

Counties, North Carolina to the Appalachian region. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2003

Mr. BALLENGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend title 40, United States Code, to add Catawba 

and Cleveland Counties, North Carolina to the Appalachian region.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COUNTIES ADDED TO THE APPALACHIAN RE4 GION. 

5 Section 14102(a)(1)(G) of title 40, United States 

6 Code, is amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘Catawba,’’ after ‘‘Caldwell,’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by inserting ‘‘Cleveland,’’ after ‘‘Clay,’’.

Æ
### Modal Composition and Age of Intrusions in North-Central and Northeast Nevada

By: Edward A. du Bray**A. Elizabeth Jones Crafford

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds250

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area