alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3384 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3384

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitations on 
  the maximum amount of the deduction of interest on education loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 28, 2003

    Mr. Wu introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitations on 
  the maximum amount of the deduction of interest on education loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Loan Interest Full 
Deductibility Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LIMITATIONS ON MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF DEDUCTION OF 
              INTEREST ON EDUCATION LOANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to maximum deduction) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsections (b) and (f), and
            (2) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) as 
        subsections (b), (c), and (d), respectively.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 6050S(e) of such Code is amended 
by striking ``section 221(d)(1)''and inserting ``section 221(c)(1)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to payments made in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
§ 714.6 Are you required to retain salvage powers over the leased property? You must retain salvage powers over the leased property. Salvage powers protect you from a loss and provide you with the power to take action if there is an unanticipated change in conditions that threatens your financial position by significantly increasing your exposure to risk. Salvage powers allow you: ( a ) As the owner and lessor, to take reasonable and appropriate action to salvage or protect the value of the property or your interests arising under the lease; or
( b ) As the assignee of a lease, to become the owner and lessor of the leased property pursuant to your contractual rights, or take any reasonable and appropriate action to salvage or protect the value of the property or your interests arising under the lease.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CNE Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10 QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
W. Benoit, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                           /s/ George W. Benoit
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           George W. Benoit
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           November 14, 2003


                                       39
# Publicatieblad C 463I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0995 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 463I |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 64e jaargang16 november 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0995

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 463I

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

64e jaargang16 november 2021

---

| Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informatie |
| | INFORMATIE AFKOMSTIG VAN DE INSTELLINGEN, ORGANEN EN INSTANTIES VAN DE EUROPESE UNIE |
| | Europese Commissie |
| 2021/C 463 I/01 | Aanstelling van een raadadviseur-auditeur in bepaalde mededingingsprocedures | 1 |

Inhoud

Bladzijde

IV   Informatie

INFORMATIE AFKOMSTIG VAN DE INSTELLINGEN, ORGANEN EN INSTANTIES VAN DE EUROPESE UNIE

Europese Commissie

2021/C 463 I/01

Aanstelling van een raadadviseur-auditeur in bepaalde mededingingsprocedures

1

---

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

IV Informatie

INFORMATIE AFKOMSTIG VAN DE INSTELLINGEN, ORGANEN EN INSTANTIES VAN DE EUROPESE UNIE

Europese Commissie

| 16.11.2021 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | CI 463/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2021

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

CI 463/1

---

Aanstelling van een raadadviseur-auditeur in bepaalde mededingingsprocedures

(2021/C 463 I/01)

Na de overplaatsing van de heer Wouter WILS heeft de Commissie de heer Eric GIPPINI FOURNIER met ingang van 1 december 2021 aangesteld als raadadviseur-auditeur, overeenkomstig het besluit van de voorzitter van de Europese Commissie van 13 oktober 2011 betreffende de functie en het mandaat van de raadadviseur-auditeur in bepaalde mededingingsprocedures (PB L 275 van 20.10.2011, blz. 29).

---
EXHIBIT31.2




CERTIFICATION




I,
Michael P. Robbins, Interim Chief Financial Officer of The Fashion House
Holdings, Inc., (the “Company), certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Fashion House Holdings,
Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date: May 20,
      2008
            By:
            /s/ Michael
      P.
      RobbinsMichael
      P. RobbinsInterim
      Chief Financial Officer
#### JONES et al. v. BOB CASON MOTOR CO.

No. 30768.

Oct. 6, 1942.

*129 P. 2d 840.*

E. N. Jones, of Ada, for plaintiffs in error.

Ben Hatcher, of Ada, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action upon a promissory note, and at the conclusion of the trial judgment was entered for the plaintiff. Defendants made no defense to the merits of the action, but objected on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to comply with 68 O. S. 1941 § 1515, relating to the payment of intangible personal property tax. The record negatives the contention that such tax was not paid.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the appeal is frivolous and taken for delay only. A response has been filed. From an examination of the motion, the response thereto, brief of plaintiff in error and the transcript, we are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed under the rule announced in Humphreys v. Liberty National Bank, 180 Okla. 44, 67 P. 2d 790; Smith v. Graham Brown Shoe Co., 179 Okla. 559, 67 P. 2d 448; Smith v. Aronoff, 179 Okla. 560, 67 P. 2d 447.

The appeal is dismissed.

RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, GIBSON, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. DAVISON, J., not participating. WELCH, C. J., and CORN, V. C. J., absent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000796486
<NAME> ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         146,286
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  250,023<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      17,742,033<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,036,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     11,005,411
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,420
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,849,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,036,917
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,104,702
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,915,995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             634,090
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (367,110)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (63,803)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (303,307)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (346,525)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.64)
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES NET OF ALLOWANCE
<F2>PP&E NET OF DEPRECIATION
</FN>


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

**Date:**                     October 21, 2009-10 a.m.                          ( print page 53243)    

**Place:**                     800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC.                

**Status:**                     A portion of the meeting will be in Open Session and the remainder of the meeting will be in Closed Session.                

**Matters to be Considered:**

## Open Session

1. Discussion of Court of Appeals Mandate in Landstar.

2. Briefing on Conclusion of FY 2009 Budget.

## Closed Session

1. World Chance Logistics (Hong Kong).

2. Lindblad Expeditions, Inc.—Evidence of Financial Responsibility.

3. Staff Briefing Regarding Global Economic Downturn and Potential Impact on Stakeholders.

**Contact Person for More Information:**                     Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 523-5725.                

Karen V. Gregory,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-25065 Filed 10-14-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE P
Session: 9:07AM – 9:16AM 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

 

 MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS:

HONORABLE RAUL M. ARIAS-MARXUACH, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

 Date: December 1, 2021 

COURTROOM DEPUTY: Natassia Ochoa Civil 21-1211 (RAM)

COURT REPORTER: Zoom Recording 

======================================================================== 

 Attorneys: 

 Keila Garcia-Colon Juan R. Gonzalez-Munoz 

 

vs. 

 Corporation of the State Insurance Fund Peter W. Miller 

 Myriam C. Ocasio-Arana 

 

======================================================================== 

CASE CALLED FOR INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. 

The Court granted the schedule in the Joint Report of the Parties' Rule 26(f) 

Planning Meeting, but extended each date by sixty (60) days. The new timetable is 

as follows: 

EVENT DATE 

Amendment to Pleadings or to Add 

Parties 

 Plaintiff 

 Defendant 

March 15, 2022 

March 15, 2022 

Service of Written Discovery 

 First Set of Interrogatories 

 First Request for Production 

 First Request for Admissions 

February 1, 2022 

February 1, 2022 

February 1, 2022 

Responses to Written Discovery March 11, 2022 

Supplemental Written Discovery 

(Optional) 

 Second Request for Production 

 Second Request for Admissions 

March 31, 2022 

March 31, 2022 

Responses to Supplemental Written 

Discovery May 16, 2022 

Case 3:21-cv-01211-RAM Document 80 Filed 12/01/21 Page 1 of 2

Exhibit 5

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22501-5 Filed:10/04/22 Entered:10/04/22 17:43:25 Desc:

Exhibit Minutes of Proceedings Page 1 of 2
Plaintiff’s deposition May 16, 2022 

Deposition of Plaintiff’s Witnesses June 13-24, 2022 

Announcement of Experts 

 Plaintiff 

 Defendant 

March 31, 2022 

April 29, 2022 

Production of Expert Reports 

 Plaintiff 

 Defendant 

May 16, 2022 

June 17, 2022 

Expert Witness’ Depositions July 1-31, 2022 

Conclusion of Discovery August 15, 2022 

Dispositive Motions August 31, 2022 

Oppositions to Dispositive Motions September 30, 2022 

Replies to Oppositions to 

Dispositive Motions 

October 17, 2022 

Joint Proposed Pretrial Order December 7, 2022 

Pretrial/Settlement Conference December 12, 2022 

Jury Trial December 19, 2022 

The parties informed that the Mandatory Initial Disclosures have been 

exchanged. The parties were granted until December 15, 2021 to file motions as to 

why the damages aspect of the case should not be stayed under PROMESA. Also by 

December 15, 2021, Defendant shall file the Answer to the Complaint. The Court 

inquired as to prospects for settlement. 

S/ Natassia Ochoa 

Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22501-5 Filed:10/04/22 Entered:10/04/22 17:43:25 Desc: Case 3:21-cv-01211-RAM Document 80 Filed 12/01/21 Page 2 of 2

Exhibit Minutes of Proceedings Page 2 of 2
#### Bridget O'Connor, Plaintiff, *v.*The Union Railway Co., Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

January, 1901.)

Costs — Attach to any recovery in an action brought under Code C. 3?., § 1903 for causing death by negligence — Code C. F., §§ 3863, subd. 3, 3338, subd. 3.

Where, in an action brought under Code C. P., § 1902, to recover damages for the death of a decedent caused by the negligence of the defendant, the plaintiff recovers six cents damages, she is entitled to tax a full bill of costs.

Appeal by plaintiff from the clerk’s taxation of costs in an action for negligence.

Baggott & Ryall, for plaintiff.

Hoadly, Lauterbach & Johnson, for defendant.

Truax, J.

This is an action to recover damages for causing death by negligence. On the trial plaintiff recovered but six cents damages, and therefore the clerk refused to tax costs in favor of the plaintiff, and taxed a full bill of costs against the plaintiff. From this action of the clerk the plaintiff, appeals. *729Plaintiff is entitled to costs upon the rendering of a judgment in his favor in an action of this kind by the express terms of subdivision 3 of section 3228 of the Code of Civil Procedure. By the terms of that subdivision, however, if plaintiff recovers less than fifty dollars damages in an action to recover for an assault, battery,' false imprisonment, slander, criminal conversation, seduction, or malicious prosecution, or a fine or penalty, in which the People of the State are a party, the amount of his costs cannot exceed his damages. These exceptions (except the one relating to a fine or penalty) are referred to in the third subdivision of section 2863, which limits the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace in certain cases. This last subdivision (3) also excepts an action brought under section 1902 of the Code, under which section this action was brought. How, if it was intended to except an action of this kind, it would have been mentioned in subdivision 3 of section 3228 along with the other exceptions mentioned in that section. Subdivision 4 of section 3228 provides in effect, that in an action to recover a sum of money only other than one of those specified in subdivisions 1, 2 and 3 of that section, plaintiff shall not recover costs unless he recovers the sum of fifty dollars or more. The defendant is. entitled to costs in actions specified in section 3228 only when plaintiff is not entitled to them. The action of the clerk is overruled, and he is directed to tax a full bill of costs for plaintiff.

Ordered accordingly.
#### § 412.5 Policy.

As provided in this part, Eximbank may accept payment from a non-Federal source (or authorize an employee to receive such payment on its behalf) with respect to attendance of the employee at a meeting or similar event which the employee has been authorized to attend in an official capacity on behalf of Eximbank. The employee's immediate supervisor and Eximbank's designated agency ethics official or his/her designee (DAEO) must approve any offer and acceptance of payment under this part in accordance with the procedures described below. If the employee is a member of Eximbank's Board of Directors, only the DAEO's approval is required. Any employee authorized to travel in accordance with this part is subject to the maximum per diem or actual subsistence expense rates and transportation class of service limitations prescribed in 41 CFR chapter 301.
#### § 602.24 Responses to demands served on non-FCA employees or entities.

If you are not an employee and are served with a demand or a subpoena in a legal proceeding directing you to produce or testify about an FCA report of examination, other document created or adopted by FCA, or any related document, you must object and immediately tell the General Counsel of such service, the testimony or documents described in the demand, and all relevant facts. You also must object to the production of any documents on the basis that they are FCA's property and cannot be released without FCA's consent. You should tell the requester the production of documents or testimony must follow the procedures in this part.
#### § 412.9 Conflict of interest analysis.

Eximbank may accept payment from a conflicting non-Federal source if the conditions of § 412.7 are met and the employee's supervisor (except in the case of Board members) and the DAEO determine that Eximbank's interest in the employee's attendance at or participation in the meeting or similar event outweighs concern that acceptance of the payment by Eximbank may cause a reasonable person to question the integrity of Eximbank's programs and operations. In determining whether to accept payment, Eximbank shall consider all relevant factors, including the purpose of the meeting or similar event, the importance of the travel for Eximbank, the nature and sensitivity of any pending matter affecting the interests of the conflicting non-Federal source, the significance of the employee's role in any such matter, the identity of other expected participants, and the location and duration of the meeting or similar event.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Blue Valley Ban Corp (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

March 18th, 2005


                                        /s/ Robert D. Regnier
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert D. Regnier,
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Mark A. Fortino
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Mark A. Fortino,
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Order entered February 13 , 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00955

- CV

ELYAHOU LAVIZADEH AN D PARVANEH LAVIZADEH , TRUSTEES OF THE

ELYAHOU AND PARVANEH LAVIZADEH TRUST 2004, Appellant s

V.

ALI A. MOGHADAM, Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 15

- 06627



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellee’s February 11, 2019 unopposed motion for extension of time

to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellee’s brief due March 25, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE