alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    5
<MULTIPLIER>                              1000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                   9,812
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                          105,813
<ALLOWANCES>                             1,612
<INVENTORY>                            149,404
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       288,361
<PP&E>                                 436,445
<DEPRECIATION>                         118,882
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         843,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  144,090
<BONDS>                                218,946
<COMMON>                                   432
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                             394,878
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           843,683
<SALES>                                255,597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       255,597
<CGS>                                  167,408
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          167,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       5,269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         30,032
<INCOME-TAX>                            12,025
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     18,007
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                            18,007
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.43
        


</TABLE>
§ 308.536 Initial decision. ( a ) The ALJ will issue an initial decision based only on the record, which will contain findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the amount of any penalties and assessments imposed.
( b ) The findings of fact will include a finding on each of the following issues: ( 1 ) Whether the claims or statements identified in the complaint, or any portions of such claims or statements, violate § 308.502 of this subpart; and
( 2 ) If the person is liable for penalties or assessments, the appropriate amount of any such penalties or assessments considering any mitigating or aggravating factors that he or she finds in the case, such as those described in § 308.530 of this subpart.
( c ) The ALJ will promptly serve the initial decision on all parties within 90 days after the time for submission of post-hearing briefs and reply briefs (if permitted) has expired. The ALJ will at the same time serve all parties with a statement describing the right of any defendant determined to be liable for a civil penalty or assessment to file a motion for reconsideration with the ALJ or a notice of appeal with the Board. If the ALJ fails to meet the deadline contained in this paragraph, he or she will notify the parties of the reason for the delay and will set a new deadline.
( d ) Unless the initial decision of the ALJ is timely appealed to the Board, or a motion for reconsideration of the initial decision is timely filed, the initial decision will constitute the final decision of the Board and will be final and binding on the parties 30 days after it is issued by the ALJ.
#### REED FOR USE OF POLLY v. McGREW.

Assumpsit to recover back money paid on a contract — evidence—competency.

Upon the common counts to recover back money paid on a special contract, the contract is not evidence in the first instance; the circumstances which make it evidence must be first provenw

One who has covenanted to convey the land to the defendant* which he failed to convey to the plaintiff, is a competent witness ’; if he have apy interest,-it is balanced between the parties.

Assumpsit. The declaration contains the common count, for money had and received. Plea — non assumpsit.

The suit was brought to recover back money paid upon a contract for the sale of land, which had not been complied with by the defendant.

The plaintiff offered to read in evidence, a contract for the exchange of land, which was objected to on the part of the defendant.

Lane, J.

The contract is not now evidence. If it is to be made so because it is connected with, or dependent upon some other fact to be proved, that fact must be first introduced, if required by the defendant, in order to open the door for this evidence.

The defendant then offered to read a deposition of one Henline, who had covenanted to convey the land to the defendant. It was objected to this, that the witness was interested, and might discharge his own liability.

Lane, J.

For the present, the deposition may be read. The interest of the witness, if any, is balanced between these parties, or cannot be affected by the verdict.

Verdict for the defendant.

Motion for a new trial — reserved for Court in Bank* [See 5 Ohio *R.*375.]
#### Miami Fisheries Company, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Samuel P. Cates, Jr., by His Father and Next Friend, Samuel P. Cates, Sr., *Defendant in Error.*

Decision Filed April 28, 1923.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Dade- County; H. Pierre Branning, Judge.

*Price & Price,*for Plaintiff in Error;

G. *A. Worley & Son,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

All concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-2147-000]

Take notice that on April 3, 2000, PowerGasSmart.com, Inc. filed a name change with their quarterly report for the quarter ending March 31, 2000. The quarterly report was noticed on April 10, 2000, but the name change was not.

The legal name change was as follows:

Old: Wilson Power & Gas Smart, Inc.

New: PowerGasSmart.com, Inc.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before May 1, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10333  Filed 4-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 1 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 2 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 3 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 4 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 5 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 6 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 7 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 8 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 9 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 10 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 11 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 12 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 13 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 14 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 15 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 16 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 17 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 18 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 19 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 20 of 21
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-13 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 9 part 5 - Second Amended POC Page 21 of 21
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Western Earth Surface Processes 

##### U.S. Geological SurveyOpen-File Report 2006-1347Version 1.0

# Preliminary geologic map of the Black Mountain  area northeast of Victorville, San Bernardino County, California

### *By* Paul Stone 

#### 2006

#### 

The Black Mountain area is in the Mojave Desert about 20 km  northeast of Victorville, California.   The geology of this area is of interest primarily for its excellent exposures  of the early Mesozoic Fairview Valley Formation, a sequence of weakly  metamorphosed sedimentary rocks including a thick, commercially important unit  of limestone conglomerate that has been mined for cement at Black Mountain  Quarry for several decades.  Recent geochronologic  work has shown that the Fairview Valley Formation is probably of Early Jurassic  age.  This preliminary geologic map of  the Black Mountain area depicts the stratigraphic and structural relations of  the Fairview Valley Formation and the associated rocks, most notably the  overlying Sidewinder Volcanics of Early(?), Middle, and Late(?) Jurassic  age.  The map is based on new field  studies by the author designed to clarify details of the stratigraphy and  structure unresolved by previous investigations.  The map is considered preliminary because the  ages of some geologic units critical for a satisfactory understanding of the  stratigraphic and structural framework remain unknown.

The map area also includes a segment of the Helendale Fault,  one of several faults of known or inferred late Cenozoic right-lateral  displacement that make up the Eastern California Shear Zone.  The fault is marked by aligned  northeast-facing scarps in Pleistocene or older alluvial deposits and the  underlying bedrock units.  Relations in  the map area suggest that right-lateral displacement on the Helendale Fault  probably does not exceed 2 km, a conclusion compatible with previous estimates  of displacement on this fault based on relations both within and outside the Black Mountain  area.

----

Download this map as a ~34" x 34" PDF file (of2006-1347.pdf; 1.2 MB)

Download the readme file: bm-readme.txt (5 kB)

Download the metadata file: bm_met.txt (53 kB)

Download data package: bm.tar.gz (255 kB that expands to a 1.45 MB folder)

For questions about the content of this report, contact Paul Stone 

Suggested citation and version history: (version_history.txt; 8 KB)

----

Download a free copy of the latest version of Adobe Reader.

| Help | PDF help | Publications main page || Western Open-File Reports for 2006 || Geologic Division | Western Earth Surfaces Processes |
This report is available only on the Web
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey	URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1347/	Page Contact Information: Michael Diggles	Page Last Modified: July 10, 2007 (mfd)
#### Section 04 Air Carrier Groupings

(a) All large certificated air carriers are placed into three basic air carrier groupings based upon their level of operations and the nature of these operations. In order to determine the level of operations, total operating revenues for a twelve-month period are used. The following operating revenue ranges are used to establish air carrier groupings:

| Carrier Group | Total Annual Operating Revenues |
| --- | --- |
| I | 0-$100,000,000 |
| II | $100,000,001-$1,000,000,000 |
| III | $1,000,000,001 + |

For reporting purposes, Group I air carriers are further divided into two subgroups: (1) Air carriers with total annual operating revenues from $20,000,000 to $100,000,000 and (2) Air carriers with total annual operating revenues below $20,000,000.

(b) Both the criteria for establishing air carrier groupings and the assignment of each air carrier to a specific group of carriers will be reviewed periodically by the Director, Office of Airline Information, to assure the maintenance of appropriate standards for the grouping of carriers. When an air carrier's level of operations passes the upper or lower limit of its currently assigned carrier grouping, the carrier is not automatically transferred to a different group and a new level of reporting. The Office of Airline Information will issue an updated listing of the carrier groups on an annual basis. A carrier may petition for reconsideration of its assigned carrier grouping or request a waiver from the accounting and reporting requirements that are applicable to a particular group under the provisions of section 1-2 of this Uniform System of Accounts and Reports.

[Amdt. 241-60, 56 FR 12658, Mar. 27, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 66723, Dec. 26, 1995; No. DOT-OST-2014-0140, 84 FR 15931, Apr. 16, 2019]
#### COWDEN *v.*STEVENSON.

Scire facias — order to quash writ — appeal—final judgment — two nihils — service.

An appeal liesfiom the Court of Common Pleas, in all cases of final judgment, or order, which disposes of the subject. An appeal lies from an order quashing a writ.

A scire facias must issue iu the county where the record is, and cannot be sent into another county for execution, without special provision of law.

Two nihils returned to a scire facias, are held equivalent to services where the legislature has made no provision requiring other service.

Appeal from the Common Pleas. This was a scire facias to obtain restitution of money collected upon a judgment, afterwards reversed. It was issued in Jefferson, directed to the sheriff of Tuscarawas county. The Court of Common Pleas quashed the writ, because it issued erroneously. From this order to quash, the appeal is taken.

*D. L.*Collier, for the defendant,

moved to quash the appeal, because the order quashing the writ is not a *judgment*from which an appeal lies. 2d. To quash the writ, if the appeal is sustained. Tappan, contra.

By the Court.

The 108th section of the practice act of 29 *O.L.*78, gives the appeal, in civil cases, from any judgment or decree of the *Court of Common*Pleas, *in any case in which that Court has original jurisdiction.*The practice under this law is only to allow appeals from *final*judgments, or those judgments which dispose of the subject matter before the court. This seems to us a case of that description. But that can make little difference to the plaintiff; for if the appeal be sustained, the writ must be quashed. The writ of scire facias can only be issued in the court where the record is; but the legislature has made no provision for directing a writ in a case situated as this is, to another county for service; nor is it absolutely necessary they should, for, in all cases of scire facias, two nihils, in practice, are held equal to service, and to authorize the court to proceed to judgment, unless there is special provision made for other service.

The appeal is sustained, but the writ is quashed at the plaintiff’s costs.
#### NOBLE *v.*MARKLEY AND SHEARER.

Security for costs — endorsement after return of writ — sci. fa. on when copied into the record.

An endorsement on a writ as security for costs, after the return of the writ and a continuance of the same, is good, .under the practice of the courts, and may be enforced by scire facias, if the endorsement on the writ has been copied into the final record of the cause.

Scire vacias, to make securities whose names are endorsed upon a writ, liable for costs. A declaration upon a scire facias has been filed, and particularly states the plaintiff’s case, to which there are several pleas.

1.. Nul tiel record in the Supreme Court, of the summons, judgment, and appeal. Replication there is such record, on which issue is taken.

2. That Tice (the original defendant) was a resident of the county where the writ-was sued out, in 1826, and continued to reside in the county, till 1828; and that the writ was not endorsed by the *178defendants until after its service and return, and the case had been several times continued in court. To this there was a general demurrer and joinder.

*V.*Worthington, for the plaintiff.

Strait,. for the defendants.

Lane, J.

The only question here, is, whether a voluntary endorsement of a writ for costs, after its return, imposes an obligation upon the security which can be enforced by a scire facias? The statute in force, when this writ was endorsed, (22 *O. L.*50) provides that when the plaintiff is not a resident or freeholder in the county, the writ shall be endorsed by some resident freeholder, as security for costs, before the clerk shall deliver the same to the plaintiff, and that the person so endorsing shall thereby be bound, and liable to pay all costs, &c. in the Court of Common Pleas and Supreme Court; and after final judgment in the case, may be charged by scire facias. Upon the equity of this statute,and the practice under it, to take security for costs, by endorsement of the writ, when ordered by the court during the pendency of the suit, we are disposed to sanction the proceedings, and so hold the endorsement obligatory, and the" endorsers liable in this form of action. The plea therefore is no bar, and the demurrer must be sustained.

Upon inspecting the record as to the other issue, it appeared that the entry of the security was not" embraced in the *record of the judgment.*A *diminution*of the record was then suggested, leave given to amend, and the cause was continued.
###### Editorial Note on Part 11

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

#### § 11.7 What is a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking?

On occasion, FAA may decide that it needs more information on an issue, or that we should take a different approach than we proposed. Also, we may want to follow a commenter's suggestion that goes beyond the scope of the original proposed rule. In these cases, FAA may issue a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to give the public an opportunity to comment further or to give us more information.
Exhibit
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of APA Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anil K. Jain,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
                15(d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





November
      14, 2005








Signature: /s/
      Anil K. Jain


Print
      Name: Anil
      K. Jain


Print
      Title: Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer