alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 603.330 Request for amendment to record. ( a ) If, after disclosure of the requested information, an individual believes that the record is not accurate, relevant, timely, or complete, that person may request in writing that the record be amended. Such a request shall be submitted to the Privacy Act Officer and shall contain identification of the system of records and the record or information therein, a brief description of the material requested to be changed, the requested change or changes, and the reason for such change or changes.
( b ) The Privacy Act Officer shall acknowledge receipt of the request within 10 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays) and, if a determination has not been made, advise the individual when that person may expect to be advised of action taken on the request. The acknowledgment may contain a request for additional information needed to make a determination.
[51 FR 41942, Nov. 20, 1986]
###### Editorial Note on Part 747

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 747.206 Consent to termination of insured status.

Unless the credit union appears at the hearing designated in the notice of hearing by a duly authorized representative, it will be deemed to have consented to the termination of its status as an insured credit union. In the event the credit union fails to so appear at such hearing, the administrative law judge shall forthwith report the matter to the NCUA Board and the NCUA Board may thereupon issue an order terminating the credit union's insured status.
§ 703.9 Safekeeping of investments. ( a ) A Federal credit union's purchased investments and repurchase collateral must be in the Federal credit union's possession, recorded as owned by the Federal credit union through the Federal Reserve Book-Entry System, or held by a board-approved safekeeper under a written custodial agreement that requires the safekeeper to exercise, at least, ordinary care.
( b ) Any safekeeper used by a Federal credit union must be regulated and supervised by either the Securities and Exchange Commission, a Federal or State depository institution regulatory agency, or a State trust company regulatory agency.
( c ) A Federal credit union must obtain and reconcile monthly a statement of purchased investments and repurchase collateral held in safekeeping.
( d ) Annually, the Federal credit union must analyze the ability of the safekeeper to fulfill its custodial responsibilities, as evidenced by capital strength, liquidity, and operating results. The Federal credit union should consider current financial data, annual reports, external assessments of creditworthiness, relevant disclosure documents, and other sources of financial information.
[68 FR 32960, June 3, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 39831, July 1, 2004; 77 FR 74109, Dec. 13, 2012]
§ 7.1003 Money lent by a national bank at banking offices or at facilities other than banking offices. ( a ) *In general.* For purposes of what constitutes a branch within the meaning of 12 U.S.C. 36(j) and 12 CFR 5.30, “money” is deemed to be “lent” only at the place, if any, where the borrower in-person receives loan proceeds directly from national bank funds: ( 1 ) From the lending national bank or its operating subsidiary; or
( 2 ) At a facility that is established by the lending national bank or its operating subsidiary.
( b ) *Receipt of national bank funds representing loan proceeds.* Loan proceeds directly from national bank funds may be received by a borrower in person at a place that is not the national bank's main office and is not licensed as a branch without violating 12 U.S.C. 36, 12 U.S.C. 81 and 12 CFR 5.30, provided that a third party is used to deliver the funds and the place is not established by the lending national bank or its operating subsidiary. A third party includes a person who satisfies the requirements of § 7.1012(c)(2), or one who customarily delivers loan proceeds directly from national bank funds under accepted industry practice, such as an attorney or escrow agent at a real estate closing.
( c ) *Services on equivalent terms to those offered customers of unrelated banks.* An operating subsidiary owned by a national bank may distribute loan proceeds from its own funds or bank funds directly to the borrower in person at offices the operating subsidiary has established without violating 12 U.S.C. 36, 12 U.S.C. 81 and 12 CFR 5.30 provided that the operating subsidiary provides similar services on substantially similar terms and conditions to customers of unaffiliated entities including unaffiliated banks.
[61 FR 4862, Feb. 9, 1996, as amended at 85 FR 83727, Dec. 22, 2020]
#### CRAWFORD *v.*CULLY.

Bill of exchange — order by client for money collected — notice.

An order by a client upon his attorney to pay money out of any collected by him, is not a bill of exchange.

The party receiving money in advance upon such an order, is liable for the advance, if he have no notice of the refusal to pay, bj7 the attorney.

Assumpsit on the money counts. Plea non assumpsit. An order drawn by the defendant in Ohio, on an attorney at law in Virginia, - with whom he had left some demands to collect, to pay the plaintiff $160, out of the moneys collected by him, was read to the jury, and evidence given to show that the plaintiff advanced the defendant $150 on the order, and that the attorney had before paid to the defendant more than he had collected.

*Searle,*for the defendant,

asked the court to instruct the jury, that to entitle the plaintiff to recover, he must prove a demand of the drawee, and that notice to the defendant was placed in the post-office, within three days thereafter. He cited *Ch. on Bills,*48.

*H. Stanberry,*contra,

cited *Ch. on Bills,*43, 192.

*Wood,*J.

The paper offered is not a bill of exchange, or subject to the law merchant governing bills. It is a mere order by a client upon his attorney to pay over money which he had collected; an order on a contingent fund. The attorney had no money to pay over. The plaintiff being so advised, sues for the money he advanced on the order, and the party receiving the money, seeks to excuse himself from paying, because he has had no notice that his own attorney did not pay, because he had no funds. We think the notice unnecessary in a case like this.

Verdict for the plaintiff.

*454
      *W. Stanberry*

moved for a new trial, because the court erred in instructing the jury, the notice was unnecessary.

Wood, J.

The order offered in evidence was upon a contingent fund. Its legal effect is the same as if it were to pay *$160*to Crawford, if you have collected that much for me. Such an order would not be a bill of exchange. *Ch. on*Bills, 56,7; 1 Bibb, 502. The drawee of such an order could not claim to be exonerated, because he had not notice in time. . The motion is overruled.
Exhibit 32 (a)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the
quarter ended June 30, 2003, I, James G. Rakes, President and Chief Executive
Officer of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

        (2)the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.



_/s/ JAMES G. RAKES_
 ------------------
James G. Rakes
Chairman
President and Chief Executive Officer
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0264

Directorate Identifier: 2009NM244AD

A300-28-6064, R02 --- 3/10/08

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3379 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 3379

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 6, 2003

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Government 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3210 East 10th Street in Bloomington, Indiana, as the ``Francis X. 
                   McCloskey Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3210 
East 10th Street in Bloomington, Indiana, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Francis X. McCloskey Post Office Building'' .

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Francis X. McCloskey Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 5, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          43,266
<SECURITIES>                                   117,465
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,901
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               202,872
<PP&E>                                       3,074,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                 705,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,607,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,662,651
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,607,635
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               421,213
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  263,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             112,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,504
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
----

|   | TITAN      INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | (Registrant)                   |

| Date:   | February      26, 2009 | By:   | /s/      MAURICE M. TAYLOR JR.            |
|-------------------|------------------------|-----------------|-------------------------------------------|
|              |                   |            | Maurice      M. Taylor Jr.                |
|              |                   |            | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer |
|              |                   |            | (Principal      Executive Officer)        |

|   |   | By:   | /s/      KENT W. HACKAMACK                   |
|--------|--------|-----------------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |   |            | Kent      W. Hackamack                       |
|   |   |            | Vice      President of Finance and Treasurer |
|   |   |            | (Principal      Financial Officer)           |
Editorial Note on Part 747
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 747.22 Consolidation and severance of actions. ( a ) *Consolidation.* ( 1 ) On the motion of any party, or on the ALJ's own motion, the ALJ may consolidate, for some or all purposes, any two or more proceedings, if each such proceeding involves or arises out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences, or involves at least one common respondent or a material common question of law or fact, unless such consolidation would cause unreasonable delay or injustice.
( 2 ) In the event of consolidation under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, appropriate adjustment to the prehearing schedule must be made to avoid unnecessary expense, inconvenience, or delay.
( b ) *Severance.* The ALJ may, upon the motion of any party, sever the proceeding for separate resolution of the matter as to any respondent only if the ALJ finds: ( 1 ) Undue prejudice or injustice to the moving party would result from not severing the proceeding; and
( 2 ) Such undue prejudice or injustice would outweigh the interests of judicial economy and expedition in the complete and final resolution of the proceeding.
§ 721.2 What is an incidental powers activity? An incidental powers activity is one that is necessary or requisite to enable you to carry on effectively the business for which you are incorporated. An activity meets the definition of an incidental power activity if the activity: ( a ) Is convenient or useful in carrying out the mission or business of credit unions consistent with the Federal Credit Union Act;
( b ) Is the functional equivalent or logical outgrowth of activities that are part of the mission or business of credit unions; and
( c ) Involves risks similar in nature to those already assumed as part of the business of credit unions.
Exhibit 99.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westerbeke Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 27, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John H. Westerbeke, Jr., Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

                                       By: /s/ John H. Westerbeke, Jr.
                                           ------------------------------
                                           John H. Westerbeke, Jr.
                                           Chairman of the Board, President
                                           and Chief Executive Officer

September 9, 2002


<PAGE>  25
# C_2023220EN.01002401.xml

| 22.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/24

---

EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 April 2023

(Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of ESA’s Decision No 195/04/COL 14 July 2004 (1))

(2023/C 220/05)

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines as amended by ESA’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To obtain the applicable reference rates, appropriate margins shall be added to the base rate in accordance with the State Aid Guidelines.

Base rates have been determined as follows:

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.4.2023 – | 6,37 | 0,00 | 3,15 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.4.2023 –

6,37

0,00

3,15

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and EEA Supplement to the OJ No. 26/2006, 25.5.2006, p. 1.

---
#### BISBEE *v.*HALL.

Levy — Sale and *judgment**— execution—process—issue out of chancery — new trial — re-hearing.

A levy and' sale cannot be sustained without a corresponding judgment.

A judgment in the Supreme Court, though sent to the Court of Common Pleas for execution, remains a judgment of the Supreme Court, and must be described as such.

The Supreme Court cannot correct the errors in the process of another court.

Where the issue has been sent by chancery into a court of law for trial, the court of law will not grant a new trial, but report to the chancery court, who in its discretion, may allow a re-hearing, and send the issue again to the court of law.

Issue directed out of chancery, to- try whether the plaintiff or the defendant have the right to a lot in the city of Cincinnati. The plaintiff claimed under a lease from A. Moore - to Joseph Robinson, dated the 1st January, 1813, for ninety-nine years, for *‡1'50*a year rent, payable the 1st January in each year, with the privilege of re-entering in case of non payment, and to hold till the arrearages *60and costs should be repaid, and if not paid for a whole year, of re-entering, and to hold the lease as forfeited. This lease was assigned by Robinson to S. M. Leavenworth.

A deed was given in evidence, from the sheriff of Hamilton, for the lot as sold on an execution upon a judgment of E. Stone, assignee of Boal *v.*Flint, Leavenworth and others, in the Supreme Court. Also a deed from White to the plaintiff, dated the 25th September, 1824, and proof that he left the possession in 1826. He then offered ajudgment of Stone *v.*Flint, &c. a fi. fa. levy, and sale to one White.

*Hammond,*for the defendant,

objected, that the execution was of a judgment in the Common Pleas, and the deed recites a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, but the record shows a judgment in the Supreme Court. It appeared that the judgment had been rendered in the Supreme Court, and the cause remanded to the Court of Common Pleas for execution.

*Caswell*and *Starr,*contra,

cited 1 *Dunl. Pr.*774; 4 *Wend. R.*478; 3 *Am. Dig.*267; 3 *Marsh. R.*523; 13 *John. R.*97.

*Fox,*in reply.

By the Court.

The record certainly is of a judgment in the Supreme Court. The execution on its face is upon a judgment in the Court of Common Pleas. The execution provided by our law goes from the Court of Common Pleas, in cases taken *to the*Supreme Court, by appeal or by writ of error, though the judgment is in the Supreme Court. This Court cannot correct the errors of the process of another court. The objection is fatal, and the evidence is excluded. Verdict for the defendant.

A new trial is moved for, and submitted.

By the Court. This issue is out of chancery. In such cases the practice is for the court of law to report to the court of chancery the verdict, and for that court on written application to allow or refuse at discretion, a new hearing, and for chancery to send the case into the court of law again, if a rehearing is granted. The motion here, therefore, is overruled.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of ANTs software
inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for the period ended June 30,
2008:





1.  Fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certification is being provided
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is
it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.





Date:    August
18, 2008




/s/   Joseph
      KozakJoseph
      Kozak, Chairman  and  Chief Executive
      Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the
Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request.