alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 200 (Monday, October 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25034]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Site visit review of the Materials Research Science and 
Engineering Center (MRSEC) at the University of Pennsylvania (Penn) 
by NSF Division of Materials Research (DMR) Proposal Review Panel 
for Materials Research, <greek-i>1203.
    Dates & Times: Monday, November 16, 2009; 6 p.m.-9 p.m.
    Tuesday, November 17, 2009; 7:45 a.m.-9 p.m.
    Wednesday, November 18, 2009; 7:45 a.m.-3:30 p.m.
    Place: University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
    Type of Meeting: Part-open.
    Contact Person: Dr. William Brittain, Program Director, 
Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division 
of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-5039.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the MRSEC at the University of 
Pennsylvania.
    Agenda:

Monday, November 16, 2009

6 p.m.-7:30 p.m. Closed--Panel Briefing.
7:30 p.m.-9 p.m. Open--Review of Penn MRSEC.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

7:45 a.m.-4:45 p.m. Open--Review of the Penn MRSEC.
4:15 p.m.-6 p.m. Closed--Executive Session.
6 p.m.-7 p.m. Open--Poster Session.
7 p.m.-9 p.m. Open--Dinner.

Wednesday, Nov. 18, 2009

8 a.m.-9 a.m. Closed--Executive session.
9 a.m.-9:45 a.m. Open--Review of the Penn MRSEC.
9:45 a.m.-3:30 p.m. Closed--Executive Session, Draft and Review 
Report.

    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 14, 2009.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-25034 Filed 10-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### J. F. McKinstry, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Seaboard Air Line Railway, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

Decision Filed March 12, 1923.

A Writ of Error to a Judgment of the Circuit Court within and for the County of Alachua; A. V. Long, Judge.

*A. H. & Roswell King*and *W. S. Broome,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Hampton & Hampton,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, aiffrmed.

All concur.
EXHIBIT A

Schedule of Claims Subject to Three Hundred Ninety-Sixth Omnibus Objection

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22491-1 Filed:10/04/22 Entered:10/04/22 16:21:59 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 2
CLAIMS TO BE DISALLOWED REMAINING CLAIMS

NAME

DATE 

FILED

CASE NUMBER / 

DEBTOR CLAIM # CLAIM AMOUNT NAME

DATE 

FILED

CASE NUMBER / 

DEBTOR CLAIM # CLAIM AMOUNT

1 ALVAREZ SANTIAGO, 

ELSIE S.

HC 2 BOX 22601

CABO ROJO, PR 00623-

9274

07/27/20 17 BK 03283-LTS / 

Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico

174305 Undetermined* ALVAREZ SANGIAGO, 

ELSIE SOCORRO

HC 2 BOX 22601

CABO ROJO, PR 00623-

9274

09/07/21 17 BK 03283-LTS / 

Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico

179565 $ 30,000.00

Reason: Amended and superseded by a later filed Proof of Claim.

2 GENESIS SECURITY 

SERVICES, INC

LUIS L TORRESMARRERO

PO BOX 195075

SAN JUAN, PR 00919-5075

06/29/18 17 BK 03283-LTS / 

Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico

129777 $ 12,384,427.39* GENESIS SECURITY 

SERVICES, INC.

LUIS L. TORRESMARRERO

P. O. BOX 195075

SAN JUAN, PR 00919-5075

09/27/21 17 BK 03283-LTS / 

Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico

179621 $ 10,543,240.30

Reason: Amended and superseded by a later filed Proof of Claim.

3 ORTIZ ROBLEDO, 

BRUNILDA

URB CAPARRA 

TERRACE, 1126 CALLE 

30 SE

SAN JUAN, PR 00921-2218

06/29/18 17 BK 03283-LTS / 

Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico

82115 $ 15,600.00 ORTIZ ROBLEDO, 

BRUNILDA

URB. CAPARRA 

TERRACE

1126 - 30 SE

SAN JUAN, PR 00921-2218

09/05/21 17 BK 03283-LTS / 

Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico

179566 $ 15,600.00

Reason: Amended and superseded by a later filed Proof of Claim.

4 SUCESION PASTOR 

MANDY MERCADO

MARÍA E. VICÉNS 

RIVERA

1218 AVE HOSTOS STE 

117

PONCE, PR 00717-0944

04/19/18 17 BK 03283-LTS / 

Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico

6272 $ 30,000,000.00* THE ESTATE OF PASTOR 

MANDRY MERCADO

CHARLES A. CUPRILL, 

ESQ.

CALLE FORTALEZA 356

SAN JUAN, PR 00901-1717

08/31/21 17 BK 03283-LTS / 

Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico

179550 $ 30,496,000.00*

Reason: Amended and superseded by a later filed Proof of Claim.

* Indicates claim contains unliquidated and/or undetermined amounts Page 1 of 1

Three Hundred and Ninety-Sixth Omnibus Objection

Exhibit A - Claims to Be Disallowed

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22491-1 Filed:10/04/22 Entered:10/04/22 16:21:59 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 21

- 00050

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.G. and T.G., C hildren

From the 288th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- PA

- 00237

Honorable Richard Garcia , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

We ORDER no costs assessed because appellant is indigent.

SIGNED July 21, 202 1.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
#### SUSANNAH HARPER *v.*J. S. HARPER.

General reputation — particular facts — bad reputation resulting from the adverse party.

The general reputation of the complainant in a divorce case may be inquired into, but particular acts of criminality cannot be proven.

The proof against the defendant must be confined to the causes alleged in the petition against him; his general reputation is not in issue.

Where there is reason to suspect that the general reputation of the complainant has been Injured by the defendant’s means, it will be disregarded. */*

Divorce. Cause, adultery with Ellen Wilcox and Jane Richardson. It appeared in evidence that these parties were married about eight years ago, and that about two years since the husband was seen in' bed with Ellen Wilcox. He was afterwards seen in bed with Jane Richardson, and had lived with her as his wife for two years. He had secreted and conveyed away his property. A witness was called to prove his general character for chastity.

The Court.

That is not in issue.

Witnessés were then called and questioned'as to the reputation of the complainant. Some spoke well of her;- others had heard unfavorable reports of her, some of which originated with the defendant. A witness was then asked as to a particular act of her’s with an individual.

By the Court. The complainant’s *general*character or reputation for chastity is in issue; that she should be prepared to defend and sustain: but of the intention to give *evidence_ofparticular acts*against her, she is not advised by the state of the case; those acts are not in issue. The inquiries of the witnesses must be confined to *general*reputation.

The evidence being closed, and the case submitted— •

*284The Court said, the adultery of the defendant as charged in the bill, is sufficiently proven, and he continues his adulterous intercourse. The reputation of the complainant assumes a suspicious aspect before us, and were it not for the conviction that the defendant’s own malignant efforts have more or less contributed to fix her reputation, we should dismiss the petition. A woman’s reputation while living separate from her husband, is the subject of close observation and severe scrutiny. The conduct of the defendant has been and is grossly immoral, and to what extent his immoralities and his efforts to injure her may be connected with her reputation, we cannot certainly say. Upon the whole, we think she is not much impeached, and that she is entitled to a divorce for the adultery complained of, which is decreed accordingly. He has so covered up his property, that we cannot divide it, or certainly ascertain its value. The wife will be secured in the property of the moveables now in her possession, and is entrusted with theguai’dianship of her daughter; and the defendant is ordered to pay the complainant two hundred and fifty dollars for alimony and the support of the child, together with the costs, in sixty days, or execution may issue for that amount.
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 432I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0987 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 432I |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 6426 ta' Ottubru 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0987

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 432I

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 6426 ta' Ottubru 2021

---

| Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Avviżi |
| | PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI |
| | L-Istitut Ewropew tal-Innovazzjoni u t-Teknoloġija |
| 2021/C 432 I/01 | Sejħa għall-proposti għall-ħolqien ta’ Komunità ta’ Għarfien u Innovazzjoni tal-Istitut Ewropew tal-Innovazzjoni u t-Teknoloġija — Identifikatur tas-Sejħa HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN | 1 |

Werrej

Paġna

V   Avviżi

PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI

L-Istitut Ewropew tal-Innovazzjoni u t-Teknoloġija

2021/C 432 I/01

Sejħa għall-proposti għall-ħolqien ta’ Komunità ta’ Għarfien u Innovazzjoni tal-Istitut Ewropew tal-Innovazzjoni u t-Teknoloġija — Identifikatur tas-Sejħa HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN

1

---

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

V Avviżi

PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI

L-Istitut Ewropew tal-Innovazzjoni u t-Teknoloġija

| 26.10.2021 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | CI 432/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2021

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

CI 432/1

---

Sejħa għall-proposti għall-ħolqien ta’ Komunità ta’ Għarfien u Innovazzjoni tal-Istitut Ewropew tal-Innovazzjoni u t-Teknoloġija

Identifikatur tas-Sejħa HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN

(2021/C 432 I/01)

F’konformità mar-Regolament (UE) 2021/819 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-20 ta’ Mejju 2021 dwar l-Istitut Ewropew tal-Innovazzjoni u t-Teknoloġija (EIT), b’dan qed jingħata avviż tat-tnedija ta’ sejħa għal proposti għal Komunità ta’ Konoxxenza u Innovazzjoni ġdida (KKI) tal-EIT. Qed issir stedina għal proposti għas-sejħa.

Qasam ta’ prijorità indirizzat permezz ta’ din is-sejħa: Setturi u Industriji Kulturali u Kreattivi

L-iskadenza tas-sejħa u l-informazzjoni rilevanti kollha dwar il-modalitajiet tas-sejħa, il-kriterji ta’ valutazzjoni u l-gwida għall-applikanti dwar kif jiġu sottomessi l-proposti hija disponibbli fit-test tas-sejħa u fuq il-paġna tas-sejħa tas-sit web tal-EIT:

https://eit.europa.eu/our-activities/call-for-eit-communities/2021

---
§ 793.7 Payment of approved claims. ( a ) Upon allowance of his claim, claimant or his duly authorized agent shall sign the voucher for payment, Standard Form 1145, before payment is made.
( b ) When the claimant is represented by an attorney, the voucher for payment (S.F. 1145) shall designate both the claimant and his attorney as “payees.” The check shall be delivered to the attorney whose address shall appear on the voucher.
FTC Consumer Alert

Detect, Protect, Dis-infect: Consumers Online 

Face Wide Choices in Security Products 

With new threats to computer security and data integrity a regular feature of the evening news, 

a panoply of products that promise to detect, protect, and dis-infect are being marketed to consumers. Intrusion detection systems, firewalls and anti-virus software are critical to online security, but 

the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the nation’s consumer protection agency, says computer users — from grade school kids to grandparents — need to know exactly why they need online security 

products and what they’re buying. 

Why the Need

Computers “talk” to each other over the Internet by sending data through their communications 

ports. If a port is open, it “listens” for communications from the Internet. A computer has thousands 

of ports: which ones are open depends on the software the computer is running. Hackers can “eavesdrop” or scan the ports to determine which are open and vulnerable to unauthorized access. 

Detection

An intrusion detection system (IDS) monitors incoming Internet traffic, much like a security camera “watches” your front door to see who might be trying to come in. When the IDS detects a suspicious pattern, it sends an alert (and creates a record) that an intruder may be trying to break in to your 

computer. Some IDS alerts — but not all — show a pop-up message on your screen. An IDS alone 

cannot prevent an unauthorized entry into your computer; only a firewall can do that. 

Protection

Firewalls block hackers’ access to your computer by creating a barrier — like a wall — between 

your ports and the Internet that allows you to control the data that comes and goes through your ports. 

Your firewall protects your ports even if you don’t have an IDS. Sometimes a firewall is bundled with 

an IDS. If not, and if you want an IDS, be sure it’s compatible with your firewall.

Dis-infection

Anti-virus software detects and deletes viruses that are in your computer. Viruses often attach 

themselves to your computer through email attachments and floppy disks. That means a firewall can’t 

catch them. Similarly, an IDS won’t alert you when a virus is attacking your computer. Look for antivirus software that recognizes current viruses, as well as older ones; that can effectively reverse the 

damage; and that updates automatically.

Federal Trade Commission ■ Bureau of Consumer Protection ■ Offi ce of Consumer and Business Education 
The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices 

in the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop, and avoid them. To file 

a complaint or to get free information on consumer issues, visit www.ftc.gov or call toll-free, 1-877-

FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357); TTY: 1-866-653-4261. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to hundreds of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.

September 2004
Martin, Michael (OST} 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Everyone: 

Martin, Michael (OST) 

Wednesday, October 08, 2014 12:26 PM 

Mike Morgan (MMorgan@kearneygov.org); 'Darwin Skelton 

(dskelton@flyscottsbluff.com)'; Jim Lynaugh (jlyn(lugh@ke(lrneygmt.org);, Randy 

Meininger (rmeininger@scottsbluff.org); Mike Sha·rkey '(msllarkey@hamTiton.net); 

Stanley Clouse (mayor@kearneygov.org); Mickey Bowman (mickeybowman@msn.com); 

Boutique Air, Shawn Simpson 

michael.mooney@sixelconsulting.com; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); Kelly Carbone 

(KellyC@CharterAirTransport.com); mmatthews@flygreatlakes.com 

EAS at Kearney, North Platte, and Scottsbluff 

ADI EAS BID for DEN Service to EAR BFF and LBF - 2nd round - October 7, 2014.pdf; 

Boutique Air EAS Proposal for 2nd round - October 7, 2014.pdf; Great Lakes BFF EAR 

LBF Bid 2014 10-07-14 final.pdf; Via Air Proposal- NE3- September 29, 2014.pdf 

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Kearney, North Platte, and Scottsbluff, and give 

you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary 

for Aviation and International Affairs. We issued Order 2014-8-20 on August 28, 2014, requesting a second round 

proposals from airlines interested in providing EAS at the above-mentioned communities for a new term. In response to 

our request, ADI, Boutique Air, Great Lakes Aviation, and Via Air submitted proposals. 

I have attached each air carrier's proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov 

sometime this afternoon. I request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as 

possible, but no later than Friday, November 7. Please send your comments directly to me via e-mail at 

michael.f.martin@dot.gov. Also, please forward this e-mail to all relevant parties that I have not included on this 

distribution list. 

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. 

Regards, 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) 

(202) 366-6494 

1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gary Graves, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of LPA Holding Corp. and La
Petite Academy, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants' other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrants, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants' disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants' internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants' most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants' fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants' internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrants' other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants' auditors and the audit committee of the registrants' board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
like to adversely affect the registrants' ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants' internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: February 6, 2004

By /s/ Gary A. Graves
  --------------------------
   Gary A. Graves
   Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and in connection with the Annual Report onForm 10-K/A of PostProperties, Inc. (“Post”) and Post Apartment Homes,L.P. (“PAH”, and together with Post, the“Registrants”) for the year ended December 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, theExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Post andPost GP Holdings, Inc., PAH’s general partner, certifiesthat: 1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and  2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Registrants./s/ Christopher J. Papa Christopher J. PapaExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 27, 2006 Post Properties, Inc.Post Apartment Homes, L.P.
#### CATHARINE JOHNSTON *v.*LUKE JOHNSTON.

-Divorce — wilful absence — alimony—injunction.

A man leaving his family frequently, poorly provided, but returning, is not wilfully absent.

If the wife afterwards go to her friends, and he remove to another county, and has been gone two or three years, the time is too uncertain to decree a divorce upon.

Adultery is not madeaout by proof that the husband was seen at the house of a woman late and'early, to the neglect of his own woman, or hugged and nursed her in company, and the superadded belief of a witness, that-he might have seen more if he had wished.

In such case, alimony will be ordered to defray the expense of prosecution and maintenance, and the husband will be enjoined from interfering with the wife, or her earnings, or the children, until the further order of the court.

Divorce, cause alleged, wilful absence more than three years, and adultery with Susanna Lines.

A witness testified to the marriage of the parties, their living together, and having children. He frequently left his family poorly provided for, but would return occasionally and live with them. It had been so for six or seven years. He continued so to return 'home, until the wife left the house about two or three years ago, when he removed to Coshocton county. *‘*I have seen him, (said the witness) at the house of Susanna Lines, late and early, to the neglect of his own woman; and I have seen him hugging and nursing her in company, and I verily believe I might have seen more if I had wished.’ Mrs. Johnston’s character is good.

By the Court-.

You make a case for alimony, but not for a divorce. The absence has not been long enough to be within the statute — the adultery may be suspected, but. is not proven. He is ordered to pay *$50*in ten days, for present subsistence and expenses, and *$50*every ninety days thereafter, for the support of the complainant and the children, and is enjoined from interfering to control her person or earnings, ot with the children, until the further order of the court. The cause is continued.