### 2941 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Notices

impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).

8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).

9 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Release Nos. 58778 (October 14, 2008), 73 FR 62577 (October 21, 2008) and 54228 (July 27, 2006), 71 FR 44066 (August 3, 2006) (SR–CBOE–2006–14) (approving revisions to CBOE’s Obvious Error Rules).

10 See Notice, supra note 3.

11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act 7 and the rules and regulations thereunder. Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, 8 in that the proposal is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts, to remove impediments to and to perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.

The Commission notes that, in approving proposals relating to adjustment or nullification of trades involving obvious errors, it has stated that the determination of whether an obvious error has occurred and the process for reviewing such a determination should be based on specific and objective criteria and subject to specific and objective procedures. 9 The Commission notes that the proposed change to Rule 1092 provides specific and objective procedures for determining whether a trade should be nullified. The purpose of the new provision is to provide that obvious and catastrophic errors related to complex orders that trade against other complex orders will be nullified. The Commission also notes that the proposed rule change, by providing that obvious and catastrophic errors related to complex orders that trade against other complex orders will be nullified, is designed to mitigate the risk to both parties to a complex order trade involving two complex orders, neither or whom, according to the Exchange, intended to end up with just one piece of the complex order. 10 Therefore, the Commission believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act.

It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 11 that the proposed rule change (SR–Phlx–2010– 163) is hereby approved.

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 12 Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011–891 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 8011–01–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE** 

**[Public Notice: 7301]**

**Bureau of Political-Military Affairs: Directorate of Defense Trade Controls;**  **Notifications to the Congress of Proposed Commercial Export Licenses** 

**SUMMARY :**  Notice is hereby given that the Department of State has forwarded the attached Notifications of Proposed Export Licenses to the Congress on the dates indicated on the attachments pursuant to sections 36(c) and 36(d) and in compliance with section 36(f) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776).

**DATES :**  Effective Date: As shown on each of the 14 letters.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mr. Robert S. Kovac, Managing Director, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department of State (202) 663–2861.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Section 36(f) of the Arms Export Control Act mandates that notifications to the Congress pursuant to sections 36(c) and 36(d) must be published in the Federal Register when they are transmitted to Congress or as soon thereafter as practicable.

December 1, 2010 (Transmittal No. DDTC 10–103) Hon. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives. Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to Section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act, I am transmitting, herewith, certification of a proposed technical assistance agreement to include the export of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services in the amount of $100,000,000

or more.

The transaction contained in the attached certification involves the transfer of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services to support the design, manufacture and delivery of the Anik G1 Commercial Communication Satellite to Canada.

The United States Government is prepared to license the export of these items having taken into account political, military, economic, human rights, and arms control considerations.

More detailed information is contained in the formal certification which, though unclassified, contains business information submitted to the Department of State by the applicant, publication of which could cause competitive harm to the United States firm concerned.
Sincerely, Matthew Rooney, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs.
November 19, 2010 (Transmittal No. DDTC 10–104) Hon. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives. Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to Section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act, I am transmitting, herewith, certification of a proposed manufacturing license agreement to include the export of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services in the amount of $50,000,000 or

more.

The transaction contained in the attached certification involves the export of defense articles, including technical data, and defense services to Saudi Arabia for the operation and maintenance of the Saudi Ministry of Defense and Aviation, and the Royal Saudi Air Defense Forces HAWK and PATRIOT Air Defense Missile Systems.

The United States Government is prepared to license the export of these items having taken into account political, military, economic, human rights, and arms control considerations.

More detailed information is contained in the formal certification which, though unclassified, contains business information submitted to the Department of State by the applicant, publication of which could cause competitive harm to the United States firm concerned.
Sincerely, Richard R. Verma, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs.

December 6, 2010 (Transmittal No. DDTC 10–105) Hon. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to Section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act, I am transmitting, herewith, certification of a proposed amendment to a Technical Assistance Agreement for the export of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services in the amount of $100,000,000 or more.

The transaction contained in the attached certification involves the export of defense articles, including technical data, and defense services for the development, production and test of the APS–508 Radar System for the CP– 140 Aircraft Program.

The United States Government is prepared to license the export of these items having taken into account


### 2942 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Notices

political, military, economic, human rights and arms control considerations.

More detailed information is contained in the formal certification which, though unclassified, contains business information submitted to the Department of State by the applicant, publication of which could cause competitive harm to the United States firm concerned.
Sincerely, Richard R. Verma, Acting Assistant Secretary Legislative Affairs.
December 6, 2010 (Transmittal No. DDTC 10–110) Hon. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to Section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act, I am transmitting, herewith, certification of a proposed amendment to a technical assistance agreement for the export of defense articles, including technical data, and defense services in the amount of $100,000,000 or more.

The transaction contained in the attached certification involves the export of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services to support the nuclear-based Flash Radiography Sources for the United Kingdom in support of its nuclear weapons program for the UK Ministry of Defence.

The United States Government is prepared to license the export of these items having taken into account political, military, economic, human rights and arms control considerations.

More detailed information is contained in the formal certification which, though unclassified, contains business information submitted to the Department of State by the applicant, publication of which could cause competitive harm to the United States firm concerned.
Sincerely, Richard R. Verma, Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs.
December 6, 2010 (Transmittal No. DDTC 10–112) Hon. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to Section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act, I am transmitting, herewith, certification of a proposed manufacturing license agreement to include the export of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services in the amount of $100,000,000

or more.

The transaction contained in the attached certification involves the export of defense articles, including technical data, and defense services for the manufacture of Control Actuation Systems for the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) Program.

The United States Government is prepared to license the export of these items having taken into account political, military, economic, human rights and arms control considerations.

More detailed information is contained in the formal certification which, though unclassified, contains business information submitted to the Department of State by the applicant, publication of which could cause competitive harm to the United States firm concerned.
Sincerely, Richard R. Verma, Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs.
December 6, 2010 (Transmittal No. DDTC 10–114) Hon. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to Section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act, I am transmitting, herewith, certification of a proposed permanent export license for the export of defense articles, to include technical data, related to firearms in the amount of $1,000,000 or more.

The transaction contained in the attached certification involves the export of discontinued rifles to be returned to the manufacturer in Brazil for commercial resale.

The United States Government is prepared to license the export of these items having taken into account political, military, economic, human rights and arms control considerations.

More detailed information is contained in the formal certification which, though unclassified, contains business information submitted to the Department of State by the applicant, publication of which could cause competitive harm to the United States firm concerned.
Sincerely, Richard R. Verma, Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs.
December 6, 2010 (Transmittal No. DDTC 10–119) Hon. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to Section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act, I am transmitting, herewith, certification of a proposed technical assistance agreement to include the export of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services in the amount of $50,000,000 or

more.

The transaction contained in the attached certification involves the transfer of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services to support military and security training activities for the Government of Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.

The United States Government is prepared to license the export of these items having taken into account political, military, economic, human rights and arms control considerations.

More detailed information is contained in the formal certification which, though unclassified, contains business information submitted to the Department of State by the applicant, publication of which could cause competitive harm to the United States firm concerned.
Sincerely, Richard R. Verma, Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs.
December 6, 2010 (Transmittal No. DDTC 10–121) Hon. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to Section 36(d) of the Arms Export Control Act, I am transmitting, herewith, certification of a proposed manufacturing license agreement for the manufacture of major defense equipment abroad.

The transaction contained in the attached certification involves the transfer of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services, to Germany for the design, manufacture, market and sale of High-G Military Accelerometers.

The United States Government is prepared to license the export of these items having taken into account political, military, economic, human rights and arms control considerations.

More detailed information is contained in the formal certification which, though unclassified, contains business information submitted to the Department of State by the applicant, publication of which could cause competitive harm to the United States firm concerned.
Sincerely, Richard R. Verma, Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs.
December 6, 2010 (Transmittal No. DDTC 10–122) Hon. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.


### 2943 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Notices

Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to Sections 36(c) and 36(d) of the Arms Export Control Act, I am transmitting, herewith, certification of a proposed manufacturing license agreement for the manufacture of significant military equipment abroad and the export of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services in the amount of $50,000,000 or more.

The transaction contained in the attached certification involves the export of defense articles, including technical data, and defense services to Israel for the manufacturing of F–15 parts, spares, and associated tooling for end use by the Republic of Korea and the United States.

The United States Government is prepared to license the export of these items having taken into account political, military, economic, human rights, and arms control considerations.

More detailed information is contained in the formal certification which, though unclassified, contains business information submitted to the Department of State by the applicant, publication of which could cause competitive harm to the United States firm concerned.
Sincerely, Richard R. Verma, Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs.
December 6, 2010 (Transmittal No. DDTC 10–123) Hon. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to Section 36(d) of the Arms Export Control Act, I am transmitting, herewith, certification of a proposed manufacturing license agreement for the manufacture of major defense equipment abroad.

The transaction contained in the attached certification involves the transfer of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services, to The Netherlands for the manufacture of Dayside CCD Cameras, Lower Arm Support Assemblies and CCA Test Stations for end use by the United States Government.

The United States Government is prepared to license the export of these items having taken into account political, military, economic, human rights and arms control considerations.

More detailed information is contained in the formal certification which, though unclassified, contains business information submitted to the Department of State by the applicant, publication of which could cause competitive harm to the United States firm concerned. Sincerely, Richard R. Verma, Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs.
December 6, 2010 (Transmittal No. DDTC 10–126) Hon. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to Section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act, I am transmitting, herewith, certification of a proposed technical assistance agreement to include the export of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services in the amount of $1,000,000 or

more.

The transaction contained in the attached certification involves the export of defense articles, including technical data, and defense services relating to the development and demonstration of lightweight small arms technologies for the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence.

The United States Government is prepared to license the export of these items having taken into account political, military, economic, human rights and arms control considerations.

More detailed information is contained in the formal certification which, though unclassified, contains business information submitted to the Department of State by the applicant, publication of which could cause competitive harm to the United States firm concerned.
Sincerely, Richard R. Verma, Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs.
December 6, 2010 (Transmittal No. DDTC 10–129) Hon. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to Section 36(c) and 36(d) of the Arms Export Control Act, I am transmitting, herewith, certification of a proposed manufacturing license agreement for the manufacture of major defense equipment abroad and the export of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services in the amount of $50,000,000 or more.

The transaction contained in the attached certification involves the export of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services to support the manufacture, assembly, test and sale of 25mm weapon stations for integration with Pandur 6x6 vehicles for end use by the Kuwait National Guard.

The United States Government is prepared to license the export of these items having taken into account political, military, economic, human rights and arms control considerations.

More detailed information is contained in the formal certification which, though unclassified, contains business information submitted to the Department of State by the applicant, publication of which could cause competitive harm to the United States firm concerned. Sincerely, Richard R. Verma, Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs.
December 6, 2010 (Transmittal No. DDTC 10–132) Hon. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to Section 36(c) and 36(d) of the Arms Export Control Act, I am transmitting, herewith, certification of a proposed manufacturing license agreement for the manufacture of significant military equipment abroad and the export of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services in the amount of $100,000,000 or more.

The transaction contained in the attached certification involves the export of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services necessary to support the manufacture of select T700 engine components for the SH–60 Helicopter for the Armed Forces of Japan.

The United States Government is prepared to license the export of these items having taken into account political, military, economic, human rights and arms control considerations.

More detailed information is contained in the formal certification which, though unclassified, contains business information submitted to the Department of State by the applicant, publication of which could cause competitive harm to the United States firm concerned.
Sincerely, Richard R. Verma, Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs.
December 6, 2010 (Transmittal No. DDTC 10–134) Hon. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to Section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act, I am transmitting, herewith, certification of a proposed technical assistance agreement to include the export of defense articles, to include technical data, and defense services in the amount of $100,000,000

or more.

The transaction contained in the attached certification involves the


### 2944 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Notices

export of defense articles, including technical data, and defense services for the Programmable Display Generator for the F–2 aircraft of the Japanese Ministry of Defense.

The United States Government is prepared to license the export of these items having taken into account political, military, economic, human rights and arms control considerations.

More detailed information is contained in the formal certification which, though unclassified, contains business information submitted to the Department of State by the applicant, publication of which could cause competitive harm to the United States firm concerned. Sincerely, Richard R. Verma, Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs.

Dated: October 10, 2010. Robert S. Kovac, Managing Director, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2011–924 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–25–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**Notice of Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Approvals and Disapprovals** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Monthly Notice of PFC Approvals and Disapprovals. In December 2010, there were eight applications approved. This notice also includes information on three other applications, one approved in May 2010, one approved in September 2010, and one approved in November 2010, inadvertently left off the May 2010, September 2010, and November 2010 notices, respectively. Additionally, 12 approved amendments to previously approved applications are listed.

**SUMMARY :**  The FAA publishes a monthly notice, as appropriate, of PFC approvals and disapprovals under the provisions of the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and Part 158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 158). This notice is published pursuant to paragraph d of § 158.29. PFC Applications Approved

Public Agency: City of Waterloo, Iowa. Application Number: 10–09–C–00– ALO.

Application Type: Impose and use a PFC. PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $35,100.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: November 1, 2011.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: March 1, 2012.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFC’s: None.

Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:

Acquisition of deicing truck. Acquisition of snow removal equipment.

Decision Date: May 12, 2010. For Further Information Contact: Sheila Bridges, Central Region Airports Division, (816) 329–2638.

Public Agency: Huntsville-Madison County Airport Authority, Huntsville, Alabama.

Application Number: 10–17–C–00– HSV.

Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.

PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $25,248,512.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: May 1,

2012.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: May 1, 2022.

Classes of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFC’s:

(1) Air taxi commercial operators; (2) certified air carriers; and (3) certified route air carriers having fewer than 500 annual passenger enplanements.

Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the public agency’s application, the FAA has determined that each approved class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements at Huntsville International Airport.

Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use: Terminal rehabilitation/baggage claim expansion.

Western land acquisition. Air carrier ramp security and safety enhancements (rehabilitate apron).

Decision Date: September 23, 2010. For Further Information Contact: Kevin Morgan, Jackson Airports District Office, (601) 664–9891.

Public Agency: San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, San Diego, California.

Application Number: 10–08–C–00– SAN.

Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.

PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $1,118,567,229.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: October 1, 2012. Estimated Charge Expiration Date: October 1, 2036.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFC’s: Non-scheduled on demand air carriers filing FAA Form

1800–31.

Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the public agency’s application, the FAA has determined that the approved class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements at San Diego International Airport.

Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use at a $4.50 PFC Level:

Terminal 2 west improvements. Airside—apron improvements. Brief Description of Project Approved for Collection and Use at a $3.00 PFC Level:

Roadway improvements—level separation.

Decision Date: November 24, 2010. For Further Information Contact: Darlene Williams, Los Angeles Airports District Office, (310) 725–3625.

Public Agency: City of Redding, California.

Application Number: 11–04–C–00– RDD.

Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.

PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $553,103.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: September 1, 2011.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: September 1, 2014.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFC’s:

None. Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use: Storage building for Part 139 equipment.

Update airport layout plan. Prepare airport electrical master plan. Acquire aircraft rescue and firefighting equipment.

Rehabilitate airfield guidance signs. Rehabilitate runway 16/34 (design only).

Rehabilitate parallel and connecting taxiways (design only).

Rehabilitate terminal building. Conduct wildlife hazard assessment. Terminal building expansion (design only).

PFC administrative costs. Reconstruct west aircraft parking apron (Air Shasta).

Reconstruct T–Hangar taxilanes. Air cargo apron expansion (design only).

Security fencing (design only). Rehabilitate and expand terminal building.