alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

OPTi Inc.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of OPTi Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report). I, Michael Mazzoni, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                         |  |  |  |                
|---------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------
|/s/  Michael Mazzoni                     |  |  |  | Date: 7/27/2010
|Michael Mazzoni, Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |
Table of Contents - Exhibits

Exhibit 13

Annual CertificationsPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Masisa S.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of the undersigned officers of Masisa S.A. (formerly known as Terranova S.A.), as
successor to the Company, certifies, pursuant to subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to such officers knowledge

(1)      The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
              financial  condition  and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
              periods expressed in the Report.

Date:  June 29, 2005

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

---
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.3

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FORM

The Board of Directors
Blue Valley Ban Corp
Overland Park, Kansas

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-46022 on Form S-8 of Blue Valley Ban Corp, of our report, dated February 17,
2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Blue Valley Ban Corp and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, which report appears in the
December 31, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Blue Valley Ban Corp.

                                        /s/ BKD, LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
March 22, 2006
Exhibit 99.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westerbeke Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 25, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gregory Haidemenos, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

      By:  /s/ Gregory Haidemenos
           ----------------------------
               Gregory Haidemenos
               Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

February 18, 2003
#### ARMSTRONG *v.*MORETON.

Covenant to pay instalments — construction.

A covenant to pay $5,000, viz: $1,000 in ten days from date, and the balance of $4,000 in four annual payments with interest from date, is in legal effect, a covenant to pay in $1,000 yearly instalments.

Covenant on a contract to pay $¡5,000 4 in payments as follows, viz: $¡1,000 in ten days from date, and the balance of $¡4,000, in four annual payments with interest from this date.’ There is a default.

*N.*Wright, for the plaintiff.

*Fox*and *Hammond,*contra.

The $>1,000 to be paid in ten days, has been paid. Under this contract, no suit can be brought for the $¡4,000, until all is due, as the contract does not determine the amount of the *annual*payments. The four years have not expired.

By the Court.

The real question is, whether after the expiration of'a year from the date of the contract, the first *$1,000*being paid, any thing can be recovered on this contract? We understand the legal effect of the contract to be, to pay in four equal annual instalments, and the plaintiff can therefore "recover the $¡1,000 with interest. Judgment accordingly.
#### § 616.6200 Out-of-territory leasing.

A System institution may make leases outside its chartered territory.
1

Fallon, Gail

From: Fallon, Gail

Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 11:03 AM

To: Jay Baker

Subject: Question about PacifiCorp BART reports

Attachments: Table of Contents for Regional Haze TSD.docx; Pacificorp 2014 Report, 08-04-2014 Utah 

Five Factor Analysis Update submittal signed.pdf

Hi Jay – The attached table of contents that was provided on one of the SIP disks Utah submitted in June shows the 

below item in TSD Chapter 2 which is not included on the TSD disk: 

 “2.e) Utah Five-Factor BART Analysis Update” 

I believe we received this from your office last September and have attached the document to this message. I assume 

Utah’s intention was to include this updated BART analysis with the June 2015 documents and that it was just 

inadvertently omitted from the disk. Please confirm. 

Thanks, 

Gail 

Gail Fallon 

Environmental Engineer 

Air Quality Planning Unit 

US EPA, Region 8 

Denver, CO 

(303) 312-6281
§ 37.4 Refunds of fees in the event of termination or prepayment of the covered loan. ( a ) *Refunds.* If a debt cancellation contract or debt suspension agreement is terminated (including, for example, when the customer prepays the covered loan), the bank shall refund to the customer any unearned fees paid for the contract unless the contract provides otherwise. A bank may offer a customer a contract that does not provide for a refund only if the bank also offers that customer a *bona fide* option to purchase a comparable contract that provides for a refund.
( b ) *Method of calculating refund.* The bank shall calculate the amount of a refund using a method at least as favorable to the customer as the actuarial method.
#### § 622.104 Order to conduct formal investigation.

A formal investigation begins with the issuance of an order by the Board. The order shall designate the person or persons who will conduct the investigation, issue, revoke, quash or modify subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum, take or cause to be taken depositions, administer oaths, and receive affirmations as to any matter under investigation by the FCA. Upon application and for good cause shown, the Board may limit, modify, or withdraw the order at any stage of the proceeding.
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-50294 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. MIGUEL SILVERIO SALAS, also known as Silver, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:09-CR-423-4
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Miguel Silverio Salas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 ( 1967), and United State s v . Flores , 632 F.3d 229 ( 5th Cir. 2011). Salas has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Salas’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no no n f riv olous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 21 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-50294 Document: 00511640333 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011No. 10-50294

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, S alas’s motion for appointment of new coun s e l is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 10-50294 Document: 00511640333 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
Schedule D

List of Main Statutes Preempted by PROMESA

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23094-4 Filed:12/16/22 Entered:12/16/22 19:10:17 Desc:

Schedule D Page 1 of 3
2

List of Main Statutes Preempted by PROMESA1

Statutory Provisions Bondholder Rights and Remedies

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 207 (providing bondholders a right to receivership in certain

circumstances)

2. 22 L.P.R.A. § 208 (providing bondholders certain rights and remedies against PREPA)

Statutory Provisions Concerning Issuance and Terms of Bonds 

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 195a-1(o), as amended by Act 17-2019, to require PREB approval of bond

issuances under certain circumstances.

2. Act 101-2020 (providing AAFAF certain approval rights over bond issuances by Puerto

Rico instrumentalities)

Statutes Concerning Means of Implementation of the Plan 

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 195a-1(u), as amended by Act 17-2019, to require PREB approval for,

among other things, the sale or transfer of PREPA’s property, and may include

limitations on the creation of subsidiaries or trusts, or the taking of any actions or

measures as are necessary or convenient to exercise PREPA’s power granted under its

enabling act.

Statutes Concerning the Contribution in Lieu of Taxes and subsidies 

1. 22 L.P.R.A. § 212(b), to establish the Contribution in Lieu of Taxes (CILT) mechanism

by which PREPA compensate municipalities.

2

2. 22 L.P.R.A. § 814, to establish limitations to the future creation of any new electric

power service subsidy, credit, or grant.3

Statutes Concerning Retirement

1. Act 106-2017 (to the extent it does not allow participants in the PREPA ERS to

participate in the Act 106 defined contribution plan).

Statutes enacted prior to PROMESA concerning the Restructuring of PREPA’s debt 

1

 The statutes listed herein are preempted for the reasons and solely to the extent set forth in Exhibit “A” to the 

Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

The Debtor reserves the right to amend this list prior to the entry of the PREPA Confirmation Order.

2 This provision is preempted solely to the extent it could be interpreted to exempt municipalities from paying the 

Legacy Charge. 

3 This provision is preempted solely to the extent it could be interpreted to restrict the creation of a new subsidy for

low-income customers relating to the Legacy Charge. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23094-4 Filed:12/16/22 Entered:12/16/22 19:10:17 Desc:

Schedule D Page 2 of 3
3

1. 22 L.P.R.A § 1054x-1 (establishing the procedure by which the PREB had to determine 

and review the transition charges and adjustment mechanisms).

2. 22 L.P.R.A § 1054b(q) (to the extent, if any, it provides PREB certain approval review 

and approval over PREPA bond issuances under Title III). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23094-4 Filed:12/16/22 Entered:12/16/22 19:10:17 Desc:

Schedule D Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epolin, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007,
as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned certifies,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley  Act  of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's  knowledge,
that:

      (1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and

       (2)   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.



Dated: Julu 12, 2007                By:  /s/ Greg Amato
                                    Greg Amato,
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)



Dated: July 12, 2007                By:  /s/ James Ivchenko
                                    James Ivchenko,
                                    President
                                    (Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Michael D. Casey certifythat:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The William Carter Company;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

 (c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August  19, 2003 |
|------------------------|
|                   |
|                   |   |   |
|                   | Michael D.  Casey |
|                   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
§ 622.11 Motions. ( a ) *How made.* An application or request for an order or ruling not otherwise specifically provided for in this subpart, unless made during a hearing, shall be made by written motion supported by a memorandum which concisely states the grounds therefor.
( b ) *Opposition.* Within 10 days after service of any written motion, or within such other period of time as may be fixed by the presiding officer, any party may file a memorandum in opposition thereto. The moving party has no right to reply except as permitted by the presiding officer. The presiding officer has discretion to waive the requirements of this section as to motions for extension of time and may rule upon such motions ex parte.
( c ) *Oral argument.* No oral argument will be heard on motions except as otherwise directed by the presiding officer or the Board.
( d ) *Rulings and orders.* Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, the presiding officer shall rule on all motions and may issue appropriate orders, except that motions may be referred to the Board if the presiding officer is unavailable or determines that such motion should be referred to the Board. Prior to the appointment of a presiding officer and after a recommended decision is filed pursuant to § 622.12, the Board shall rule on motions filed by the parties.
( e ) *Appeal from rulings on motions.* All answers, motions, objections and rulings shall become part of the record. Rulings of a presiding officer on any motion may not be appealed to the Board prior to its consideration of the presiding officer's recommended decision, except by special permission of the Board. However, such rulings shall be considered by the Board in reviewing the record. Requests to the Board for special permission to appeal from a ruling of the presiding officer shall be filed in writing within 5 days of the ruling, and shall briefly state the grounds relied on. The moving party shall immediately serve a copy thereof on every other party to the proceeding who may then respond to such request within 5 days after service.
( f ) *Continuation of hearing.* Unless otherwise ordered by the presiding officer or the Board, the hearing shall continue pending the determination of any request or motion by the Board.
§ 380.52 Adequate protection. ( a ) If the Corporation as receiver determines that it will use, sell, or lease or grant a security interest or other lien against property of the covered financial company that is subject to a security interest of a claimant, the receiver shall provide adequate protection by any of the following means: ( 1 ) Making a cash payment or periodic cash payments to the claimant to the extent that the sale, use, or lease of the property or the grant of a security interest or other lien against the property by the Corporation as receiver results in a decrease in the value of such claimant's security interest in the property;
( 2 ) Providing to the claimant an additional or replacement lien to the extent that the sale, use, or lease of the property or the grant of a security interest against the property by the Corporation as receiver results in a decrease in the value of the claimant's security interest in the property; or
( 3 ) Providing any other relief that will result in the realization by the claimant of the indubitable equivalent of the claimant's security interest in the property.
( b ) Adequate protection of the claimant's security interest will be presumed if the value of the property is not depreciating or is sufficiently greater than the amount of the claim so that the claimant's security interest is not impaired.
§ 652.20 Eligible non-program investments. ( a ) Eligible investments consist of: ( 1 ) A non-convertible senior debt security.
( 2 ) A money market instrument with a maturity of 1 year or less.
( 3 ) A portion of an ABS or MBS that is fully guaranteed by a U.S. Government agency.
( 4 ) A portion of an ABS or MBS that is fully and explicitly guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest by a GSE.
( 5 ) The senior-most position of an ABS or MBS that is not fully guaranteed by a U.S. Government agency or fully and explicitly guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest by a GSE, provided that the MBS satisfies the definition of “mortgage related security” in 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(41).
( 6 ) An obligation of an international or multilateral development bank in which the U.S. is a voting member.
( 7 ) Shares of a diversified investment fund, if its portfolio consists solely of securities that satisfy investments listed in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(3) of this section.
( b ) Farmer Mac may only purchase those eligible investments satisfying all of the following: ( 1 ) At a minimum, at least one obligor of the investment has a very strong capacity to meet financial commitments for the life of the investment, even under severely adverse or stressful conditions, and generally presents a very low risk of default. Investments whose obligors are located outside the U.S., and whose obligor capacity to meet financial commitments is being relied upon to satisfy this requirement, must also be fully guaranteed by a U.S. Government agency.
( 2 ) The investment must exhibit low credit risk and other risk characteristics consistent with the purpose or purposes for which it is held.
( 3 ) The investment must be denominated in U.S. dollars.
[83 FR 55097, Nov. 2, 2018]
#### ANNA M. COOK, APPELLANT, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT.

Submitted October 27, 1939

Decided January 25, 1940.

For the appellant, *Collins & Corbin.*

For the respondent, *William F. Hanlon.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmanc*e—The Chancellor, Trenchard, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague JJ. 12.

*For reversal*— None.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39388-39389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16957]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, July 13, 2011, 10 a.m.-12 noon.

PLACE: Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

[[Page 39389]]

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matters To Be Considered

Decisional Matters

    (a) Lead 100 ppm.
    (b) ASTM F963 Notice of Requirements.
    A live Web cast of the Meeting can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: July 1, 2011.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-16957 Filed 7-1-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```