This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final

rules. 

# Proposed Rules Federal Register 

### 10104

Vol. 78, No. 30

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

**DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE**

**Agricultural Marketing Service**

**7 CFR Part 1210**

**[Document Number AMS–FV–11–0031]**

**Watermelon Research and Promotion Plan; Importer Membership**  **Requirements**

**AGENCY :**  Agricultural Marketing Service,

USDA.

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This rule proposes to amend
the Watermelon Research and Promotion Plan (Plan) importer membership requirements to serve on
the National Watermelon Promotion Board (Board). The Board recommended to eliminate the requirement that an importer import more than 50 percent of the total volume handled and imported in order to qualify as an importer member. This change would allow for additional parties to qualify as an importer member.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received by March 15, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the Internet at: http:// www.regulations.gov or to the Promotion and Economics Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), U.S. Department of Agriculture, (USDA) Room 0632–S, Stop 0244, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250–0244; facsimile: (202) 205–2800. All comments should
reference the docket number and the date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register and will be made available for public inspection in the above office during regular business
hours or it can be viewed at http:// www.regulations.gov. All comments received will be posted without change, including any personal information provided. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or entities submitting comments will be made public on the Internet at the address provided above.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Jeanette Palmer, Marketing Specialist, Promotion and Economics Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stop 0244, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Room 0632–S, Washington, DC 20250–0244; telephone: (888) 720–9917; facsimile: (202) 205–2800; or electronic mail: Jeanette.Palmer@ams.usda.gov

.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This rule
is issued under the Watermelon Research and Promotion Plan [7 CFR part 1210]. The Plan is authorized under
the Watermelon Research and Promotion Act (Act) [7 U.S.C. 4901– 4916].

Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has been designated as ‘‘non-significant regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has waived the review process.

Executive Order 12988

In addition, this rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. The rule is not
intended to have retroactive effect.

The Act allows producers, producerpackers, handlers, and importers to file a written petition with the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) if they believe that the Plan, any provision of the Plan, or any obligation imposed in connection with the Plan, is not established in accordance with the law. In any petition, the person may request a
modification of the Plan or an exemption from the Plan. The petitioner will have the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. Afterwards, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will issue a decision. If the petitioner disagrees with the ALJ’s ruling, the petitioner has 30 days to appeal to the Judicial Officer, who will issue a ruling on behalf of the Secretary. If the petitioner disagrees with the Secretary’s ruling, the petitioner may file, within 20 days, an appeal in the U.S. District
Court for the district where the petitioner resides or conducts business.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act and Paperwork Reduction Act

In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act [5 U.S.C. 601–612], AMS has examined the economic impact of this rule on the small producers, handlers, and importers that would be affected by this rule.

The Small Business Administration defines, in 13 CFR part 121, small agricultural producers as those having annual receipts of no more than $750,000 and small agricultural service firms (handlers and importers) as those having annual receipts of no more than $7 million. Under these definitions, the majority of the producers, handlers, and importers that would be affected by this
rule would be considered small entities.
Producers of less than 10 acres of watermelons are exempt from this program. Importers of less than 150,000 pounds of watermelons per year are also exempt.

USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) data for the 2011 crop year was about 312 hundredweight (cwt.) of watermelons were produced per acre. The 2011 grower price published by NASS was $14.00 per hundredweight. Thus, the value of watermelon production per acre in 2011 averaged about $4,368 (312

cwt. × $14.00). At that average price, a producer would have to farm over 172
acres to receive an annual income from watermelons of $750,000 ($750,000 divided by $4,368 per acre equals 172). Accordingly, as previously noted, a majority of the watermelon producers
would be classified as small businesses.

Based on the Board’s data, using an average of freight on board (f.o.b.) price of $.164 per pound and the number of pounds handled in 2011, none of the watermelon handlers had receipts over the $7.5 million threshold. Therefore,
the watermelon handlers would all be
considered small businesses. A handler would have to ship over 45.7 million pounds of watermelons to be considered large (457,317,073 times $.164 f.o.b. equals $7,500,000).


### 10105 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules

According to the Board, there are approximately 950 producers, 230 handlers, and 137 importers who are required to pay assessments under the

program.

Based on the watermelon import assessments received for the year 2011, the United States imported watermelons worth over $211 million dollars. The largest imports of watermelon came
from Mexico which accounted for 89 percent of the total in 2011. Other suppliers of imported watermelon are Guatemala at 8 percent and Costa Rica at 1 percent. The remaining 2 percent of imported watermelon came from Nicaragua, Honduras, Panama, Vietnam, Canada, Dominican Republic, and
Israel.

The Board’s audit records show imports for the fiscal years 2009, 2010, and 2011 at $754,760, $746,043, and $855,890 respectively. Based on this data, the three-year average of imports for watermelon totals $785,564 (2,356,693 divided by 3). This represents approximately 30 percent of the total assessments paid to the Board. Currently, the Board membership distribution consists of 14 producers, 14 handlers, 8 importers, and 1 public
member. A final rule to increase the number of importers on the Board was published in the July 18, 2011, Federal Register [76 FR 42009].

The Watermelon Research and Promotion Improvement Act of 1993
amended the Watermelon Research and Promotion Act by adding importer members to the Board among other things. At that time the industry recommended that, in order to qualify as an importer member on the Board, an
individual that both handles and imports watermelons may vote for importer members and serve as an importer member if that person imports 50 percent or more of the combined
total volume of watermelons handled and imported by that person. A final rule was published in the Federal Register on February 28, 1995 [60 FR 10795] containing this and other amendments to the program.

At the time of this amendment there
was a more clear division of roles among producers, handlers, and importers. In other words, those individuals that imported watermelons did not cross over into handling or producing watermelons as much as they do now. Since then, the industry has
become more consolidated and of the 137 importers required to pay
assessments 42 also handled watermelons and would be eligible to serve as either handler or importer
member. At its February 26, 2011, meeting, the Board voted unanimously, to modify the importer eligibility requirements to serve on the Board. The Board is having difficulty finding eligible importers to
serve on the Board because of the requirement in the Plan that a person who both imports and handles
watermelon will be counted as an importer if that person imports 50 percent or more of the combined total
volume of watermelons handled and imported by that person. The Board voted to eliminate the 50 percent requirement or more of the combined
total volume of watermelons handled and imported by a person to allow more individuals to become eligible to serve on the Board as an importer. Individuals that both handle and import would be allowed to decide which part of the industry they would prefer to represent regardless of the volume handled or imported. The industry believes that this change would increase the importer representation on the Board by allowing more individuals to be eligible to serve. This action may also increase diversity representation on the Board.

The Board considered a second alternative by changing the 50 percent
or more of the combined total volume of watermelons handled and imported by the person to 25 percent or more of the
combined total volume of watermelons handled and imported by the person. However, the Board did not choose this option because they wanted to allow more importers to be eligible for nomination on the Board and therefore, they eliminated the percentage requirement. By eliminating the percentage requirement for the importer member, this will allow for smaller importer businesses to become eligible to serve as an importer member on the
Board.

Section 1655(a) of the Act provides
for referenda to be conducted to ascertain approval of changes to the Plan prior to going into effect. In order to implement the amendments to the Plan, the Secretary determines that the Plan has been approved by a majority of the producers, handlers, and importers of watermelon voting in the referendum. Accordingly, before these amendments are made to the Plan, a referendum will be conducted among eligible producers, handlers, and importers of watermelon.

In accordance with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulation [5 CFR part 1320] which implements the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 [44 U.S.C. Chapter 35], have been assigned OMB number 0581–0093, which represents the information collection and recordkeeping requirements that are imposed by the Plan that have been approved previously, except that the background form, has been approved under OMB
number 0505–0001.

USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.

We have performed this Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis regarding the impact of this amendment to the Plan on small entities, and we invite comments concerning potential
effects of this amendment.

Background

Under the Plan, the Board administers a nationally coordinated program of research, development, advertising, and promotion designed to strengthen the watermelon’s position in the market place and to establish, maintain, and expand markets for watermelons. This program is financed by assessments on producers growing 10 acres or more of watermelons, handlers of watermelons, and importers of 150,000 pounds of watermelons or more per year. The Plan specifies that handlers are responsible for collecting and submitting both the producer and handler assessments to the Board, reporting their handling of watermelons, and maintaining records necessary to verify their reporting(s). Importers are responsible for payment of
assessments to the Board on watermelons imported into the United States through the U.S. Customs Service
and Border Protection. This action will not have any impact on the assessment rates paid by producers, handlers, and importers.

Membership on the Board consists of two producers and two handlers for
each of the seven districts established by the Plan, at least one importer, and one public member. The Board currently consists of 37 members: 14 producers, 14 handlers, 8 importers, and 1 public member. A final rule to increase the number of importers on the Board was published in the July 18,

2011, Federal Register [76 FR 42009].

The Watermelon Research and Promotion Improvement Act of 1993
amended the Watermelon Research and Promotion Act by adding importer members to the Board among other things. At that time the industry recommended that, in order to qualify as an importer member on the Board, an
individual that both handles and imports watermelons may vote for importer members and serve as an importer member if that person imports 50 percent or more of the combined
total volume of watermelons handled and imported by that person. A final rule was published in the Federal Register on February 28, 1995 [60 FR


### 10106 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules

10795] containing this and other amendments to the program. At the time
of this amendment there was a more clear division of roles among producers, handlers, and importers. In other words, those individuals that imported
watermelons did not cross over into handling or producing watermelons as much as they do now. Since then, the industry has become more consolidated and of the 137 importers required to pay
assessments 42 also handled watermelons and would be eligible to serve as either handler or importer
member.

At its February 26, 2011, meeting, the Board voted unanimously, to modify the importer eligibility requirements to serve on the Board. The Board is having difficulty finding eligible importers to
serve on the Board because of the requirement in the Plan that a person who both imports and handles
watermelon will be counted as an importer if that person imports 50 percent or more of the combined total
volume of watermelons handled and imported by that person. The Board voted to eliminate the 50 percent requirement or more of the combined
total volume of watermelons handled and imported by a person to allow more individuals to become eligible to serve on the Board as an importer. Individuals that both handle and import would be allowed to decide which part of the industry they would prefer to represent regardless of the volume handled or imported. The industry believes that this change would increase the importer representation on the Board by allowing more individuals to be eligible to serve. This action may also increase diversity representation on the Board.

Accordingly, the propose rule would amend sections 1210.321(d), 1210.363(b), 1210.404(g), and 1210.602(a) which reference importer eligibility requirements to be nominated to the Board and participation in a
referendum. These sections would be revised to read as follows: a person who both imports and handles watermelon may vote for importer members and serve as an importer member if that person identifies that their vote will be considered as an importer.

For changes to the Plan to become effective, the proposed amendments to the Plan must be approved by a majority of producers, handlers, and importers of watermelon voting in a referendum. Accordingly, a referendum will be conducted among eligible producers, handlers, and importers of watermelon. Specific dates for the referendum will
be announced at a later date.

A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposal. Thirty days is deemed appropriate so that the proposed amendments, if adopted, may be implemented to allow for the calendar year 2013 nomination meetings to take place before the appointments for new
Board members are due. All written comments received in response to this rule by the date specified would be considered prior to finalizing this

action.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1210

Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Consumer information, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Watermelon promotion.

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, Part 1210, Chapter XI of Title 7 is proposed to be amended as follows:

**PART 1210—WATERMELON**
**RESEARCH AND PROMOTION PLAN**

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1210 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 4901–4916 and 7

U.S.C. 7401.

■ 2. Revise § 1210.321 paragraph (d) to
read as follows:

**§ 1210.321 Nomination and selection.**

* * * * *

(d) Nominations for importers positions that become vacant may be made by mail ballot, nomination conventions, or by other means prescribed by the Secretary. The Board shall provide notice of such vacancies and the nomination process to all importers through press releases and any other available means as well as direct mailing to known importers. All importers may participate in the nomination process: Provided, That a person who both imports and handles watermelon may vote for importer members and serve as an importer member if that person identifies that their vote be considered as an importer.

* * * * *

■ 3. Revise § 1210.363 paragraph (b) to
read as follows:

**§ 1210.363 Suspension or termination.**

* * * * *

(b) The Secretary may conduct a referendum at any time and shall hold a referendum on request of the Board or at least 10 percent of the combined total of the watermelon producers, handlers, and importers to determine if watermelon producers, handlers, and importers favor termination or suspension of this Plan. The Secretary shall suspend or terminate this Plan at the end of the marketing year whenever the Secretary determines that the suspension or termination is favored by a majority of the watermelon producers, handlers, and importers voting in such referendum who, during a representative period determined by the Secretary, have been engaged in the production, handling, or importing of watermelons and who produced, handled, or imported more than 50 percent of the combined total of the volume of watermelons produced, handled, or imported by those producers, handlers, and importers voting in the referendum. For purposes of this section, the vote of a person who both produces and handles watermelons
will be counted as a handler vote if the producer purchased watermelons from other producers, in a combined total volume that is equal to 25 percent or more of the producer’s own production;
or the combined total volume of watermelon handled by the producer from the producer’s own production and purchases from other producer’s production is more than 50 percent of the producer’s own production. Provided, That a person who both imports and handles watermelon may vote for importer members and serve as an importer member if that person
identifies that their vote be considered as an importer. Any such referendum shall be conducted by mail ballot.

■ 4. Revise § 1210.404 paragraph (g) to
read as follows:

**§ 1210.404 Importer member nomination**
**and selection.**

* * * * *

(g) Any individual who both imports
and handles watermelons will be considered an importer if that person identifies themselves as an importer.

■ 5. Revise § 1210.602 paragraph (a) to
read as follows:

**§ 1210.602 Voting.**

(a) Each person who is an eligible producer, handler, or importer as defined in this subpart, at the time of
the referendum and who also was a producer, handler, or importer during the representative period, shall be
entitled to one vote in the referendum: Provided, That each producer in a landlord-tenant relationship or a divided ownership arrangement involving totally independent entities cooperating only to produce
watermelons in which more than one of the parties is a producer, shall be
entitled to one vote in the referendum covering only that producer’s share of the ownership: Provided further, That the vote of a person who both produces
and handles watermelons will be
counted as a handler vote if the producer purchased watermelons from


### 10107 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules

other producers, in a combined total volume that is equal to 25 percent or more of the producer’s own production;
or the combined total volume of watermelon handled by the producer from the producer’s own production and purchased from other producer’s production is more than 50 percent of the producer’s own production: Provided further, That a person who both imports and handles watermelons may vote and serve as an importer if that person identifies that their vote be considered as an importer.

* * * * *

Dated: February 5, 2013. David R. Shipman,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2013–02975 Filed 2–12–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–02–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND**
**HUMAN SERVICES**

**Food and Drug Administration**

**21 CFR Parts 1, 16, 106, 110, 112, 114, 117, 120, 123, 129, 179, and 211** 

**[Docket Nos. FDA–2011–N–0920 and FDA– 2011–N–0921]** 

**Food and Drug Administration Food Safety Modernization Act: Proposed** 
**Rules To Establish Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and**  **Holding of Produce for Human Consumption and for Current Good**  **Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive**  **Controls for Human Food; Public Meeting** 

**AGENCY :**  Food and Drug Administration,

HHS.

**ACTION :**  Notification of public meeting.

**SUMMARY :**  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing public meeting registration information for two FSMA related public meetings announced in the January 31, 2013, Federal Register. These public meetings will be held along with the February 28 to March 1, 2013, Washington, DC public meeting to discuss the proposed
rules to establish standards for the growing, harvesting, packing, and holding of produce for human consumption (the produce safety proposed rule) and for current good manufacturing practice and hazard analysis and risk-based preventive controls for human food (the preventive controls proposed rule). These proposed rules are the first of several proposed
rules that would establish the foundation of, and central framework for, the modern food safety system envisioned by Congress in the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). The purpose of the public meetings is to solicit oral stakeholder and public comments on the proposed rules and to inform the public about the rulemaking process (including how to submit comments, data, and other information to the rulemaking dockets), and to respond to questions about the proposed
rules.

**DATES :**  See section II ‘‘How to Participate in the Public Meeting’’ in the

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** section of
this document for dates and times of the Chicago, IL and Portland, OR public meetings, closing dates for advance registration, and information on deadlines for submitting either
electronic or written comments to FDA’s Division of Dockets Management.

**ADDRESSES :**  See section II ‘‘How to Participate in the Public Meeting’’ in the

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** section of
this document.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For questions about registering for these meetings, to register by phone, or to submit a notice of participation by mail, fax, or email: Courtney Treece, Planning Professionals, Ltd., 1210 West McDermott Dr., Suite 111, Allen, TX
75013, 704–258–4983, FAX: 469–854– 6992, email: ctreece@planningprofessionals.com.

For general questions about these meetings, to request an opportunity to make an oral presentation at one of the public meetings, to submit the full text, comprehensive outline, or summary of an oral presentation, or for special accommodations due to a disability,

contact: Juanita Yates, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS– 009), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 240–402–1731, email: Juanita.yates@fda.hhs.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. Background

FSMA (Pub. L. 111–353) was signed into law by President Obama on January 4, 2011, to better protect public health by helping to ensure the safety and security of the food supply. FSMA amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) to
establish the foundation of a modernized, prevention-based food safety system. Among other things, FSMA requires FDA to issue regulations requiring preventive controls for human
and animal food and set standards for produce safety.

FSMA was the first major legislative reform of FDA’s food safety authorities in more than 70 years, even though FDA has increased the focus of its food safety efforts on prevention over the past several years. For example, applying the concept of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) that was pioneered by industry in the late 1960s,
FDA established HACCP-based regulations for seafood (21 CFR part 123) in 1995 (60 FR 65096, December 18, 1995) and for juice (21 CFR part 120) in 2001 (66 FR 6138, January 19, 2001). Similarly, in 1996, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety andInspection Service instituted HACCPbased rules for meat and poultry (9 CFR part 417) (61 FR 38806, July 25, 1996).

In the Federal Register of January 16, 2013 (78 FR 3503 and 78 FR 3646), FDA
announced the establishment of two dockets so that the public can review the produce safety proposed rule and the preventive controls proposed rule and submit comments to the Agency. These proposed rulemakings are the first of several key proposals in furtherance of FSMA’s food safety mandate. The produce safety proposed
rule would establish science-based
minimum standards for the safe growing, harvesting, packing, and holding of produce, meaning fruits and vegetables, grown for human consumption. The produce safety proposed rule would set forth procedures, processes, and practices that FDA expects would reduce
foodborne illness associated with the consumption of produce. The produce safety proposed rule and related fact
sheets are available on FDA’s FSMA Web page located at http://www.fda.gov/ Food/FoodSafety/FSMA/default.htm.

The preventive controls proposed rule would apply to human food and require domestic and foreign facilities that are required to register under the FD&C Act to have written plans that identify hazards, specify the steps that will be put in place to minimize or prevent those hazards, monitor results, and act to correct problems that arise. The preventive controls proposed rule and
related fact sheets are available on FDA’s FSMA Web page located at http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/ FSMA/default.htm.

In the Federal Register of January 31, 2013 (78 FR 6762), FDA announced the first public meeting in a series of three public meetings entitled ‘‘The Food Safety Modernization Act Public Meeting on Proposed Rules for Produce Safety and for Preventive Controls for Human Food’’ so that the food industry, consumers, foreign governments, and
other stakeholders can evaluate and comment on the proposals. FDA also noted that the Agency intended to hold