alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-33487, 333-105833, and 333-161592) of our report dated April 1, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements Barrett Business Services, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinionand includes explanatory paragraphs for a correction of an error and a change in method of accounting), and the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting of Barrett Business Services, Inc. (which report expresses an adverseopinion), appearing in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Portland, OR 

April 1, 2011
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6626

RICHARD HOWARD BEALL, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GOVERNOR LAWRENCE HOGAN; 2 EAST STAFF; PAUL VINCE; TOM 

LEWIS; DIRECTOR ROBINSON; ADAM HOCKNER, Witness Defendant; 

JENAVIVE; PETER IKE; PETER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:17-cv-00340-GJH)

Submitted: July 27, 2017 Decided: August 1, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Howard Beall, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Richard Howard Beall, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with the 

court’s prior order directing him to file an amended complaint particularizing his claims. 

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Beall v. Hogan, No. 8:17-cv-00340-GJH (D. Md. 

filed May 2, 2017 & entered May 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Sodak Gaming, Inc.:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
33-92524 on Form S-8 of Sodak Gaming, Inc. of our reports dated February 14,
1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Sodak Gaming, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, and the related
schedule, which reports are included in the 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of
Sodak Gaming, Inc.


                                    \s\  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 27, 1997
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER WITHDRAWING MEDIATION ORDER

Cause number: 01-15-00335-CV

Style: Centerpoint Houston Electric, LLC v. 5433 Westheimer, LP; 

5433 Westheimer, GP LLC and Songy 5433 Westheimer GP LLC

Date motion filed: May 19, 2015

Type of Motion: Objection to Mediation

Party filing motion: Appellee

It is ordered that Appellee=s objection to mediation is granted. We withdraw our 

Mediation Order dated May 15, 2015.

Judge's signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 x Acting individually 

Date: June 4, 2015

* Absent emergency or a statement that the motion is unopposed, must wait ten days before acting on motion except for 

motion to extend time to file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a).

Note: Single justice may grant or deny any request for relief properly sought by motion, except in a civil case a single justice 

should not: (1) act on a petition for an extraordinary writ or (2) dismiss or otherwise determine an appeal or a motion 

for rehearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.4(a).
#### ANNE WHITE *v.*ROBERT S. WHITE.

Divorce — wilful absence — alimony—custody of the children.

A divorce with alimony will be decreed to the wife, where the husband has left her with the children for more'than three years without contributing to their support.

Divorce. Cause — three years wilful absence.

It was proven that several years after the marriage,the defendant left his wife and her children, without any apparent cause, and has *139continued absent ever since, for more than three years, during which time he has not in- any way contributed to her or their support. She has sustained a good character.

Br the Court.

A divorce is decreed. Give the wife the custody of the surviving child, and order him to pay $,‘200 alimony and the costs, and in default let her take execution.
§ 746.103 Material supervisory determinations. ( a ) *Material supervisory determination.* The term “material supervisory determination” means a written decision by a program office (unless ineligible for appeal) that may significantly affect the capital, earnings, operating flexibility, or that may otherwise affect the nature or level of supervisory oversight of an insured credit union. The term includes, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) A composite examination rating of 3, 4, or 5;
( 2 ) A determination relating to the adequacy of loan loss reserve provisions;
( 3 ) The classification of loans and other assets that are significant to an insured credit union;
( 4 ) A determination regarding an insured credit union's compliance with Federal consumer financial law;
( 5 ) A determination on a waiver request or an application for additional authority where independent appeal procedures have not been specified in other NCUA regulations; and
( 6 ) A determination by the relevant reviewing authority that an appeal filed under this subchapter does not raise a material supervisory determination.
( b ) *Exclusions from coverage.* The term “material supervisory determination” does not include: ( 1 ) A composite examination rating of 1 or 2;
( 2 ) A component examination rating unless the component rating has a significant adverse effect on the nature or level of supervisory oversight of an insured credit union;
( 3 ) The scope and timing of supervisory contacts;
( 4 ) A decision to appoint a conservator or liquidating agent for an insured credit union;
( 5 ) A decision to take prompt corrective action pursuant to section 216 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1790d) and part 702 of this chapter;
( 6 ) Enforcement-related actions and decisions, including determinations and the underlying facts and circumstances that form the basis of a pending enforcement action;
( 7 ) Preliminary examination conclusions communicated to an insured credit union before a final exam report or other written communication is issued;
( 8 ) Formal and informal rulemakings pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 500 *et seq.*);
( 9 ) Requests for NCUA records or information under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and part 792 of this chapter and the submission of information to NCUA that is governed by this statute and this regulation; and
( 10 ) Determinations for which other appeals procedures exist.
## NUMBER 13

- 2 3

- 002 68

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

GERALD MORA

, Appellant,

v.

CHRISTOPHER DORSEY

, Appellee.

ON APPEAL FROM THE 36 TH DISTRICT COURT

OF BEE COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Pe ñ a

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña

On June 22, 2023, appellant filed a notice of appeal. On November 29, 2023, the

Clerk of the Court notified appellant that his amended appellant’s brief did not comply with

the applicable rules of appellate procedure

. S ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.1(g)

. On December

22, 2023, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that his brief had not been properly filed

as instructed, and warn ed appellant that if he did not explain his failure to properly file his

brief within ten (10) days of the receipt of the notice, that the instant a ppeal would be2 dismissed for want of prosecution. See id . 38.8(a)(1). On January 4, 2024, the Clerk of

the Court issued a “Final Notice” to appellant, informing him that although he had filed a

“Second Amend [ ment ] on the State ment of Facts,” he had failed to file an amended brief

as requested. Appellant was notified that after ten (10) days from the receipt of the notice,

his appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if the noted defect was not cured.

See id. 42.3 (b), (c)

. On February 6, 2024, the Clerk of the Court again issued a “Final

Notice” to appellant, notifying him that he had still not filed an amended brief as requested,

and informing him that he had ten (10) days from receipt of the notice to cure the defect

or hi s appeal would be dismissed. Id

. And on March 4, 2024, the Clerk of the Court again

issued the same “Final Notice” to appellant alerting him as to the defective brief and

warning him that failure to cure the defect would result in a dismissal of this appea l for

want of prosecution. Id . This last letter was received by certified mail on March 22, 2024.

Appellant has failed to file an amended brief as requested and has otherwise not

responded to the notice s from the Clerk requiring a response or taken other appropriate

action within the time specified

. A ccordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of

prosecution. See id.

L. ARON PEÑA JR.

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

18th day of April

, 202 4

.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 18, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 135578 & (18) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan In the matter of AIHA AL-MAYAHI, Minor. Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices
SC: 135578 COA: 282568 Wayne CC: 07-000350-AO 02-413538-NA, 04-428082-DM

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to ap peal the December 18, 2007 order of th e Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

p0115 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 18, 2008

Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 17, 2009 

0610 

Order 

 

June 17, 2009 

138550 & (51) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138550 

 COA: 286992 

Berrien CC: 2005-401979-FH 

EDWARD PINKNEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 By order of April 2, 2009, the Berrien Circuit Court was directed to articulate 

specific reasons for imposing a “24/7 curfew” on the defendant and to file with the Clerk 

of the Supreme Court a transcript and related documents, if any, within 14 days of the 

completion of the proceedings on remand. On order of the Court, the transcript having 

been received, the motion for renewed immediate consideration is GRANTED, and the 

application for leave to appeal the February 18, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed 

by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000796486
<NAME> ADLEPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         105,652
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,345
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,278,425<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,628,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,488,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           263
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,218,640)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,638,419
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               350,575
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  259,150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             180,764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (88,123)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (64)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (88,059)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,079)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (90,138)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.43)
<FN>
<F1>PP&E NET OF DEPRECIATION
<F2>PP&E NET OF DEPRECIATION
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 4.5

                        [BIOMUNE CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]

                                  June 14, 2001


Mr. Allan Sweig
1553 Knollwood Lane
Highland Park, IL 60035

Dear Allan:

    This letter sets forth the terms whereby Biomune Systems, Inc., a Nevada
corporation ("Biomune"), agrees to retain Allan Sweig to act as consultant and
advisor to Biomune in the area of financing. In exchange for your services,
Biomune shall deliver to you 3,500 shares of Common Stock of Biomune, par value
$0.0001 per share, (the "Shares"), which will be duly authorized, legally and
validly issued and outstanding, fully paid, non-assessable and registered
pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Shares will be issued to
you upon an effective registration statement and adjusted to maintain value.

    In exchange for the Shares, you shall provide to Biomune advice and
direction with respect to a variety of financing activities, along with any
other activities or services requested by Biomune relating to financing
activities.

    If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding of our agreement,
please sign where indicated below and deliver a copy of this letter as provided
for herein, whereupon this letter shall represent a binding agreement between
us.

                                                  Very truly yours,

                                                  BIOMUNE SYSTEMS, INC.


                                                  By:
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Name: Larry Koskan
                                                     Title: President and CEO

Accepted and agreed to
as of the date first
above written:

---------------------------------
Allan Sweig
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 30, 1997 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED MARCH 30, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                             834
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,024
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,079
<PP&E>                                          19,575
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,361
<BONDS>                                          2,817
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,891
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,764
<SALES>                                         14,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,203
<CGS>                                            4,082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,067
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  68
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    324
<INCOME-TAX>                                        95
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                229
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       229
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24212-24213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10277]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics; Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of 
Health and Human Services announces the following advisory committee 
meeting.

    Name: National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) 
Executive Subcommittee.
    Time and Date: 11:00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. EDT, Friday, April 28, 2000.
    Place: Conference Call, Participations Dial-in Number: 1-888-
422-7124, Participants Code: 284339. Host: John Lumpkin, M.D.
    Status: Open.
    Purpose: During this conference call, the Executive Subcommittee 
will discuss work plans for future activities relating to the 
Committee's reports on the National Health

[[Page 24213]]

Information Infrastructure and the 21st Century Vision on Health 
Statistics, as well as other activities as necessary.
    Notice: This conference call is open to the public using the 
participants' dial-in telephone number and participants' code, but 
access may be limited by the number of available telephone lines.
    Contact Person for More Information: Substantive program 
information as well as summaries of meetings and a roster of 
committee members may be obtained from Marjorie S. Greenberg, 
Executive Secretary, NCVHS, National Center for Health Statistics, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Room 1100, Presidential 
Building, 6525 Belcrest Road, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone 
(301) 458-4245. Information also is available on the NCVHS home page 
of the HHS website: //www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/, where further information 
will be posted when available.

    Dated: April 19, 2000.
James Scanlon,
Director, Division of Data Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary 
for Planning and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 00-10277 Filed 4-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4151-05-M
FILED

February 5, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

EASTERN SECTION AT KNOXVILLE

ROSCOE W. FIELDS, SR., )

)

Plaintiff/Appellant ) KNOX CIRCUIT

)

v. )

)

BOBBY RAY McGEE and ) NO. 03A01-9609-CV-00296

LILLIAN BEAN, )

)

Defendants/Appellees ) AFFIRMED

Roscoe W. Fields, Pro Se, Appellant

Mary Ann Stackhouse, Knoxville, For Appellees

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

INMAN, Senior Judge

Mr. Fields says that Joe Torrence, the Circuit Court Clerk of Davidson County,

charged him an excessive fee for a certified copy of a traffic citation, for which he

attempted to seek redress in General Sessions Court of Knox County.

He says that the Judge of the Knox County General Sessions Court and the

Clerk thereof refused to allow him to file his warrant, whereupon he attempted to file

it in Davidson County, and was rebuffed; he thereupon attempted to file a redressing

action in the Davidson Chancery Court, and was again rebuffed.

He returned to Knox County, and filed this pro se action for damages against

Judge McGee and Clerk Bean, asserting that they violated his civil rights under 42 

U. S. C. §1983, by refusing to allow him to file the action against Clerk Torrence. 

The trial judge directed a verdict for the defendants at the close of the plaintiff’s case,

holding that he had failed to make out a prima facie case.

This is a proper case for affirmance under RULE 10, RULES OF THE COURT OF
1

 10. Affirmance Without Opinion - Memorandum Opinion.

(b) Memorandum Opinion. The Court, with the concurrence of all

judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions

of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would

have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum

opinion it shall be designated “MEMORANDUM OPINION,” shall not be

published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in a

subsequent unrelated case. [As amended by order filed April 22, 1992.]

2

APPEALS.

1

Costs are assessed to the appellant.

__________________________________

William H. Inman, Senior Judge

CONCUR:

______________________________

Don T. McMurray, Judge

______________________________

Charles D. Susano, Jr., Judge

 10. Affirmance Without Opinion - Memorandum Opinion.

(b) Memorandum Opinion. The Court, with the concurrence of all judges

participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by

mem orandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When

a case is decided by mem orandum opinion it shall be designated “MEMORANDUM

OPINION,” shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in a

subsequent unrelated case. [As amended by order filed April 22, 1992.]
****National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention****Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention****Fact Sheets**			  |  		**Home**			  |  		**Index**			  |  		**Search**			  |  		**Site Map**			  |  		**Subscribe**			  |  		**View PDF****HIV/AIDS & U.S. Women Who Have Sex With Women (WSW)****
# C_2017231EN.01005403.xml

| 17.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/54

---

Order of the General Court of 18 May 2017 — Consorzio IB Innovation v Commission

(Case T-126/17) (1)

1

(2017/C 231/72)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.

1

---