alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 627.3 Grounds for appointing FCSIC as conservator or receiver. ( a ) FCA may, in its discretion, appoint a conservator or receiver of a Farm Credit institution if FCA determines that one or more of the grounds in paragraph (b) of this section exists. FCA must appoint FCSIC as conservator or receiver of a Farm Credit institution. To the extent practicable, FCA will consult with FCSIC before taking a pre-resolution action that may result in a conservatorship or receivership of a Farm Credit institution.
( b ) The grounds for appointing FCSIC as a conservator or receiver of a System institution are: ( 1 ) The institution is insolvent because the value of its assets is less than its obligations to creditors and others, including its members. For the purpose of determining insolvency, “obligations to members” does not include stock or allocated equites held by current or former borrowers.
( 2 ) There has been a substantial dissipation of assets or earnings of the institution due to the violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or one or more unsafe or unsound practice(s).
( 3 ) The institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition to transact business, including having insufficient capital levels or otherwise. For the purpose of this part, “unsafe or unsound condition” includes, but is not limited to, the following conditions: ( i ) For associations, a default by the association of one or more terms of its general financing agreement with its funding bank that the Farm Credit Administration determines to be a material default;
( ii ) For all institutions, permanent capital of less than one-half the minimum required level for the institution; or
( iii ) For associations, stock impairment.
( 4 ) The institution has committed a willful violation of a final cease and desist order issued by the Farm Credit Administration Board.
( 5 ) The institution is concealing its books, papers, records, or assets, or is refusing to submit its books, papers, records, assets, or other material relating to the affairs of the institution for inspection to any examiner or to any lawful agent of the Farm Credit Administration Board.
( 6 ) A Farm Credit bank is unable to make a timely payment of principal or interest on any insured obligation(s) defined in section 5.51(3) of the Act issued by the bank individually, or on which it is primarily liable.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6057

JOHN MCLAUGHLIN-COX,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

FRANK C. SIZER, JR.; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98-

2760-MJG)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John McLaughlin-Cox, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Regina Hollins Lewis, Assistant Attorney General,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

December 15, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on December 16, 1998. Pursuant to

Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we

take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See

Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

John McLaughlin-Cox appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See McLaughlin-Cox v. Sizer, No. CA-98-

2760-MJG (D. Md. Dec. 16, 1998).* We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 11
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

§ 11.33 How can I track FAA's rulemaking activities? The best ways to track FAA's rulemaking activities are with the docket number or the regulation identifier number. ( a ) *Docket ID.* We assign a docket ID to each rulemaking document proceeding. Each rulemaking document FAA issues in a particular rulemaking proceeding, as well as public comments on the proceeding, will display the same docket ID. This ID allows you to search the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) for information on most rulemaking proceedings. You can view and copy docket materials during regular business hours at the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Or you can view and download docketed materials through the Internet at *http://www.regulations.gov .* If you can't find the material in the electronic docket, contact the person listed under **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** in the document you are interested in.
( b ) *Regulation identifier number.* DOT publishes a semiannual agenda of all current and projected DOT rulemakings, reviews of existing regulations, and completed actions. This semiannual agenda appears in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations, published in the Federal Register in April and October of each year. The semiannual agenda tells the public about DOT's—including FAA's—regulatory activities. DOT assigns a regulation identifier number (RIN) to each individual rulemaking proceeding in the semiannual agenda. This number appears on all rulemaking documents published in the Federal Register and makes it easy for you to track those rulemaking proceedings in both the Federal Register and the semiannual regulatory agenda.
[Doc. No. 1999-6622, 65 FR 50863, Aug. 21, 2000, as amended at 72 FR 68474, Dec. 5, 2007]
#### First National Bank of Carrollton *v.*Roberts.

No. 8991.

October 13, 1932.

Russell, C. J.

1. As a general rule, equity will not enjoin tile proceedings of a court of law, unless there is some intervening equity or other defense of which the party, without fault on his part, can not avail himself at law. Civil Code (1910), § 5492.

2. Any right or cause for relief which may exist in the plaintiff’s favor under the facts alleged in the petition in this case may be asserted as effectually by way of defense to the action in the city court as in a suit for equitable relief. The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and in dismissing the petition. See *House*v. *Oliver,*123 *(7a.*784 (51 S. E. 722); *Norton*v. *Graham,*130 *Ga.*391, 394 (60 S. E. 1049); *Exchange National Bank*v. *Senderson,*139 *Ga.*260, 262 (77 S. E. 36, 51 *L.*R. A. *(N.*S.) *549).*

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., absent.*

*811*Boykin & Boykin,*for plaintiff.

*S. Holderness*and *Beall &*Beall, for defendant.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2265 Filed:01/19/18 Entered:01/19/18 10:52:21 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2265 Filed:01/19/18 Entered:01/19/18 10:52:21 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
§ 323.11 Appraisal management company registration. Each State electing to register AMCs pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this section must: ( a ) Establish and maintain within the State appraiser certifying and licensing agency a licensing program that is subject to the limitations set forth in § 323.12 and with the legal authority and mechanisms to: ( 1 ) Review and approve or deny an AMC's application for initial registration;
( 2 ) Review and renew or review and deny an AMC's registration periodically;
( 3 ) Examine the books and records of an AMC operating in the State and require the AMC to submit reports, information, and documents;
( 4 ) Verify that the appraisers on the AMC's appraiser panel hold valid State certifications or licenses, as applicable;
( 5 ) Conduct investigations of AMCs to assess potential violations of applicable appraisal-related laws, regulations, or orders;
( 6 ) Discipline, suspend, terminate, or deny renewal of the registration of an AMC that violates applicable appraisal-related laws, regulations, or orders; and
( 7 ) Report an AMC's violation of applicable appraisal-related laws, regulations, or orders, as well as disciplinary and enforcement actions and other relevant information about an AMC's operations, to the Appraisal Subcommittee.
( b ) Impose requirements on AMCs that are not owned and controlled by an insured depository institution and not regulated by a Federal financial institution regulatory agency to: ( 1 ) Register with and be subject to supervision by the State appraiser certifying and licensing agency;
( 2 ) Engage only State-certified or State-licensed appraisers for Federally regulated transactions in conformity with any Federally related transaction regulations;
( 3 ) Establish and comply with processes and controls reasonably designed to ensure that the AMC, in engaging an appraiser, selects an appraiser who is independent of the transaction and who has the requisite education, expertise, and experience necessary to competently complete the appraisal assignment for the particular market and property type;
( 4 ) Direct the appraiser to perform the assignment in accordance with USPAP; and
( 5 ) Establish and comply with processes and controls reasonably designed to ensure that the AMC conducts its appraisal management services in accordance with the requirements of section 129E(a)-(i) of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. 1639e(a)-(i), and regulations thereunder.
# Iris Oifigiúil C NaN/17 S

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | Eagrán Speisialta (
  *1
  ) |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 6417 Samhain 2021 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

Eagrán Speisialta (
  *1
  )

*1

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

6417 Samhain 2021

---

| Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- |
| | Ceartúcháin |
| | Ceartúchán ar Ard-Stiúrthóireacht an Taighde agus na Nuálaíochta – Foilsiú folúntais le haghaidh fheidhm an Phríomhchomhairleora – Uachtarán Bhord na Comhairle Nuálaíochta Eorpaí (Gníomhaire Sealadach – Grád AD 14) – COM/2021/10408 ( IO C 432 A, 26.10.2021 ) | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

Ceartúcháin

Ceartúchán ar Ard-Stiúrthóireacht an Taighde agus na Nuálaíochta – Foilsiú folúntais le haghaidh fheidhm an Phríomhchomhairleora – Uachtarán Bhord na Comhairle Nuálaíochta Eorpaí (Gníomhaire Sealadach – Grád AD 14) – COM/2021/10408 ( IO C 432 A, 26.10.2021 )

( IO C 432 A, 26.10.2021 )

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (*1)   Faoin tagairt C 464 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh. |

---

(*1)   Faoin tagairt C 464 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh.

*1

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

Ceartúcháin

| 17.11.2021 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | 1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2021

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

1

---

Ceartúchán ar Ard-Stiúrthóireacht an Taighde agus na Nuálaíochta – Foilsiú folúntais le haghaidh fheidhm an Phríomhchomhairleora – Uachtarán Bhord na Comhairle Nuálaíochta Eorpaí

(Gníomhaire Sealadach – Grád AD 14)

COM/2021/10408

(
  Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 432 A an 26 Deireadh Fómhair 2021
  )

(IO L Eagrán Speisialta Gaeilge C 432, lch. 5)

Ar leathanach 5, faoi “Dáta deiridh”, an chéad alt:

| In ionad: | “Is é 12.00 meán lae, am na Bruiséile, an 26 Samhain 2021, an sprioc-am le clárú. Ní féidir clárú ina dhiaidh sin.”, |
| --- | --- |

In ionad:

“Is é 12.00 meán lae, am na Bruiséile, an 26 Samhain 2021, an sprioc-am le clárú. Ní féidir clárú ina dhiaidh sin.”,

| Léitear: | “Is é 12.00 meán lae, am na Bruiséile, an 17 Nollaig 2021, an sprioc-am le clárú. Ní féidir clárú ina dhiaidh sin.”. |
| --- | --- |

Léitear:

Léitear:

“Is é 12.00 meán lae, am na Bruiséile, an 17 Nollaig 2021, an sprioc-am le clárú. Ní féidir clárú ina dhiaidh sin.”.

---
```

[110th Congress Public Law 45]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ045.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 239]]

Public Law 110-45
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To redesignate a Federal building in Albuquerque, New Mexico, as the 
       ``Raymond G. Murphy Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 
              Center''. <<NOTE: July 5, 2007 -  [S. 229]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Federal building known and designated as the ``Department of 
Veterans Affairs Medical Center'' located at 1501 San Pedro Drive, SE, 
in Albuquerque, New Mexico, shall be known and redesignated as the 
``Raymond G. Murphy Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Raymond G. Murphy 
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center''.

    Approved July 5, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 229:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Apr. 12, considered and passed Senate.
            June 25, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 741
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 741 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 741.8 Purchase of assets and assumption of liabilities. ( a ) Any credit union insured by the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF) must receive approval from the NCUA before purchasing loans or assuming an assignment of deposits, shares, or liabilities from: ( 1 ) Any credit union that is not insured by the NCUSIF;
( 2 ) Any other financial-type institution (including depository institutions, mortgage banks, consumer finance companies, insurance companies, loan brokers, and other loan sellers or liability traders); or
( 3 ) Any successor in interest to any institution identified in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section.
( b ) Approval is not required for: ( 1 ) Purchases of student loans or real estate secured loans to facilitate the packaging of a pool of loans to be sold or pledged on the secondary market under § 701.23(b)(1)(iii) or (iv) of this chapter or comparable state law for state-chartered credit unions, or purchases of member loans under § 701.23(b)(1)(i) of this chapter or comparable state law for state-chartered credit unions;
( 2 ) Assumption of deposits, shares or liabilities as rollovers or transfers of member retirement accounts or in which a federally insured credit union perfects a security interest in connection with an extension of credit to any member.
( 3 ) Purchases of assets, including loans, or assumptions of deposits, shares, or liabilities by any credit union insured by the NCUSIF from another credit union insured by the NCUSIF, except a purchase or assumption as a part of a merger under part 708b; or
( 4 ) Purchases of loan participations as defined in and meeting the requirements of § 701.22 of this chapter.
( c ) A credit union seeking approval under paragraph (a) of this section must submit a request for approval to the appropriate regional director. The request must state the nature of the transaction and include copies of all relevant transaction documents. The regional director will approve or disapprove the request as soon as possible depending on the complexity of the proposed transaction. Credit unions should submit a request for approval in sufficient time to close the transaction.
[70 FR 75725, Dec. 21, 2005, as amended at 75 FR 34622, June 18, 2010; 78 FR 32545, May 31, 2013; 78 FR 37958, June 25, 2013; 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3538 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3538

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 201 South Chicago Avenue in Saint Anne, Illinois, as the ``Marine 
              Capt. Ryan Beaupre Saint Anne Post Office''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3538

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 201 South Chicago Avenue in Saint Anne, Illinois, as the ``Marine 
              Capt. Ryan Beaupre Saint Anne Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 
South Chicago Avenue in Saint Anne, Illinois, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Marine Capt. Ryan Beaupre Saint Anne Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Marine Capt. Ryan Beaupre 
Saint Anne Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 9, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 78 (Friday, April 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meetings during the week of 
April 24, 2000.
    Commissioner Carey, as duty officer, determined that no earlier 
notice thereof was possible.
    An open meeting will held on Tuesday, April 25, 2000 at 10 a.m. in 
Room 1C30.
    The subject matter of the open meeting scheduled for Tuesday, April 
25, 2000 at 10:00 a.m. will be: The Commission will consider issuance 
of an interpretive release providing guidance on the application of the 
federal securities laws to electronic media, including updating 
previous guidance on the use of electronic media to deliver documents 
under the federal securities laws and related matters. For further 
information, please contact P.J. Himelfarb or Mark A. Borges at (202) 
942-2900.
    A closed meeting will be held on Thursday April 27, 2000 at 11:00 
a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (8), (9)(A) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(4), 
(8), (9)(A) and (10), permit consideration for the scheduled matters at 
the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled Thursday, April 
27, 2000 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: April 19, 2000.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10205 Filed 4-19-00; 3:52 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
#### Clements Naval Stores Company, a Corporation, W. G. Clements, J. L. McWilliams, J. D. Sirmans, R. C. Reams and J. B. Mozingo, *Plaintiffs in*Error, v. J. S. Betts Company, a Corporation, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion Filed January 19, 1923.

1. To impeach, or overcome statements Contained', in,- the return of a sheriff, made under the sanction of official oath and responsibility, in whatever form assailed, requires clear and convincing proof.

2. A sheriff’s return of due service of a summons in the manner prescribed by law is .conclusive as to jurisdiction of parties, unless the same is impeached by satisfactory evidence.

A Writ of Error 'to the Circuit Court for Madison County ^ M. F. Horne, Judge.

Affirmed.

*W. B. Davis,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Wm. T. Hendry,*for Defendant in Error.

*50West, J.

This is a proceeding* upon an affidavit of illegality of an execution under the statute (Sec. 2828, Rev. Gen. Stats, of Fla.). The decisive question is one of fact. The allegations of the affidavit are traversed by the plaintiff in execution. Upon a hearing the court sustained the traverse of the affidavit and entered judgment on the bond. To review this judgment writ of error was taken.

The question involved is whether service of summons ad respondendum was made upon the defendant in the suit. On the one hand it is denied that service was made, but on the other it was affirmed that service was duly made. The evidence submitted on the point is in conflict. For the satisfaction of the litigants and their counsel we might recite and analyze the evidence, but it is not conceived that to do so would be beneficial for any other purpose.

To impeach the return of a sheriff, made under the sanction of official oath and responsibility, clear and convincing-evidence is required. Barnes v. Willis, 65 Fla. 363, 61 South. Rep. 828; Tidwell v. Witherspoon, 18 Fla. 282. Considering all the evidence in this case, it is not of the character required by this rule. On the contrary, the evidence is ample to sustain the findings of the court below.

Affirmed.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis and Browne, J. J., concur.