alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 625.20 Settlement.

A prevailing party and the FCA through its counsel may agree on a proposed settlement of an award at any time, either in connection with a settlement of the underlying adversary adjudication or after the underlying adversary adjudication has been concluded. If a prevailing party and the FCA counsel agree on a proposed settlement of an award, the proposed settlement must be submitted to the presiding officer for a recommended decision pursuant to § 625.26 of this part. If it has not been previously filed, the application must be submitted to the presiding officer along with the proposed settlement.
Exhibit 99.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westerbeke Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 27, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gregory Haidemenos, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                       By: /s/ Gregory Haidemenos
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Gregory Haidemenos
                                           Chief Financial Officer and
                                           Treasurer

September 9, 2002


<PAGE>  26
1

Filed 3/3/14 P. v. Bates CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

KENNETH BATES,

Defendant and Appellant. C073691

(Super. Ct. No. 12F07077)

Early in the morning of October 16, 2012, Sacramento County Sheriff ’s deputies

responded to an incomplete 911 call that a woman’s car had been vandalized. The car

looked like it had been in a collision an d was near a damaged t elephone pole. It was

registered to defendant Kenneth Bates and his wife. The California H igh way P atrol

(CHP) was dispatched

, and the deputies handed the investigation over to the CHP officers

when they arrived.

A CHP o fficer conta cted defendant

, who was walking away from the car and

toward the officer. Defendant walked unevenly and swayed when he stopped. He could

not stand upright and his breath smelled strongly of alcohol.

Defendant told the officer he had been driving the ca r. He drank a 40

- ounce beer

that night and hit a telephone pole with his car. He told the officer he had been drinking2

too much and should not be driving. The officer arrested defendant after he failed several

field sobriety tests and refused to take an y more.

Defen dant’s blood

- alcohol level was .24 percent.

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of

alcohol with three prior driving under the influen ce convictions within 10 years and

driving with a blood

- alcohol level of .08 percent with three prior convictions for driving

under the inf

luence within the last 10 years. The trial court placed defendant on five

years’ formal probation subject to various conditions including one year in county jail

with 153 days’ credit

.

Defendant appeals.

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening

brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and

determine whether there are any arguabl e issues on appeal. ( People v. Wende (1979) 25

Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief

within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and

we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of

the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more

favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

ROBIE , J.

We concur:

RAYE

, P. J.

MAURO , J.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

469 

CAF 13-01802 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

 

IN THE MATTER OF JONATHAN L.P. AND KIMBERLY A.P. 

------------------------------------------------ 

ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

LUIS A.O., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.)

ALAN BIRNHOLZ, EAST AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

JOSEPH T. JARZEMBEK, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

DAVID C. SCHOPP, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF

BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CHARLES D. HALVORSEN OF COUNSEL). 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Lisa Bloch

Rodwin, J.), entered October 1, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to

Family Court Act article 10. The order directed respondent to comply

with the terms and conditions of an order of protection.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Ishanellys O. (___ AD3d ___ [June

12, 2015]). 

Entered: June 12, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 95-8591 WENLEY MCCLAREN, Defendant-Appellant. On Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing in Banc. Submitted: July 16, 1996 Decided: May 1, 1997 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Wenley McClaren, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM: Appellant Wenley McClaren appealed from a district court order that, after a hearing, denied his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, motion in which he alleged that he r eceived ineffective assistance of counsel in various ways during his criminal trial. This Court previously dismissed the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. After obtaining a response from the Government, we now grant McClaren's timely petition for rehearing and deny his request for rehearing en banc. Because the district court did not appoint counsel to represent McClaren at the evidentiary hearing on his habeas motion, we vacate the district court's order, and remand the case for the court to conduct another evidentiary hearing in which Appellant is represented by appointed counsel.Though there is no constitutional right to counsel in § 2255 proceedings, "there is a statutory right to appointed counsel in a section 2255 pro ceeding under Rule 8, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, if an evidentiary hearing is required." United States v. Vasquez , 7 F.3d 81, 83 (5th Cir. 1993). Other circuits that have addressed the issue have also so held. See United States v. Duarte-Higareda , 68 F.3d 369, 370 (9th Cir. 1995); Rauter v. United States , 871 F.2d 693, 697 (7th Cir. 1989). Such error is not susceptible to harmless error review. Vasquez , 7 F.3d at 85. Neither has McClaren waived consideration of the issue on appeal. He twice requested counsel at the evidentiary hearing, and his requests were denied. He also noted the issue in his docketing statement and informal brief in this court. For these reasons, we vacate the district court's order and remandthe case with instructions that the court hold another evidentiary hearing on McClaren's § 2255 motion at which he is represented by appointed counsel. We dispense with oral argument b ecause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
2
§ 793.6 Final denial of claim. ( a ) Final denial of an administrative claim shall be in writing and sent to the claimant, his attorney, or legal representative by certified or registered mail. The notification of final denial may include a statement of the reasons for the denial and shall include a statement that, if the claimant is dissatisfied with the action of the National Credit Union Administration, he may file suit in an appropriate U.S. District Court not later than 6 months after the date of mailing the notification.
( b ) Prior to the commencement of suit and prior to the expiration of the 6-month period after the date of mailing, by certified or registered mail of notice of final denial of the claim as provided in 28 U.S.C. 2401(b), a claimant, his duly authorized agent, or legal representative, may file a written request with the National Credit Union Administration for reconsideration of a final denial of a claim under paragraph (a) of this section. Upon the timely filing of a request for reconsideration the National Credit Union Administration shall have 6 months from the date of filing in which to make a final disposition of the claim and the claimant's option under 28 U.S.C. 2675(a) to bring suit shall not accrue until 6 months after the filing of a request for reconsideration. Final National Credit Union Administration action on a request for reconsideration shall be effected in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section.
EXHIBIT A 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23005-1 Filed:12/07/22 Entered:12/07/22 11:09:48 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT A 

PARTY APPEARANCE SHEET

NAME OF PARTY Assured Guaranty Corp. and Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. 

 Appearance Method In Person in Puerto Rico or Live via 

Court Solutions 

Name William J. Natbony 

Law Firm Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Email bill.natbony@cwt.com

Phone Number (212) 504 6351

Docket Entry No. of Notice Of 

Appearance 

ECF No. 3676

ATTORNEY 2 Appearance Method In Person in Puerto Rico or Live via 

Court Solutions 

Name Thomas J. Curtin 

Law Firm Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP 

Email thomas.curtin@cwt.com 

Phone Number (212) 504 6063 

Docket Entry No. of Notice Of 

Appearance 

ECF No. 121 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23005-1 Filed:12/07/22 Entered:12/07/22 11:09:48 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
condensed  consolidated  balance sheet of Transnational  Industries,  Inc. as of
July 31, 2000 and the related condensed consolidated statement of operations and
statement  of cash flows for the six months then ended and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                              45
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3149
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       2232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6063
<PP&E>                                            2901
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    9287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4450
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         73
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                        8511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      9287
<SALES>                                           3203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3203
<CGS>                                             4269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4269
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   468
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  66
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    471
<INCOME-TAX>                                        29
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                442
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       442
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.93


</TABLE>
e:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22641-2 Filed:10/14/22 Entered:10/18/22 16:54:40 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 6
e:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22641-2 Filed:10/14/22 Entered:10/18/22 16:54:40 Desc:

Exhibit Page 2 of 6
e:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22641-2 Filed:10/14/22 Entered:10/18/22 16:54:40 Desc:

Exhibit Page 3 of 6
e:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22641-2 Filed:10/14/22 Entered:10/18/22 16:54:40 Desc:

Exhibit Page 4 of 6
e:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22641-2 Filed:10/14/22 Entered:10/18/22 16:54:40 Desc:

Exhibit Page 5 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22641-2 Filed:10/14/22 Entered:10/18/22 16:54:40 Desc:

Exhibit Page 6 of 6
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems (1205).                    

*Date and Time:*                         12, 19, 20 and 21, June, 2000, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Rooms 360, 365, 330 and 380, Arlington, Virginia 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Drs. Ken P. Chong and Jorn Larsen-Basse, Program Directors Mechanics and Structures of Materials and Surface Engineering and Material Design, Division of Civil and Mechanical Systems, Room 545, (703) 306-1361.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate nominations for the FY'00 Mechanics and Structures of Materials and Surface Engineering and Material Design Review Panel proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: April 19, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-10124  Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      L. Paul Latham                            |
|----------------------------------------------------|
| L.      Paul Latham                                |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer         |
| of      Southwest Royalties, Inc., the             |
| Managing      General Partner of                   |
| Southwest      Royalties, Inc. Income Fund VI      |
|                                               |
| November      16, 2009                             |
|                                               |
|                                               |
| /s/      Mel G. Riggs                              |
| Mel      G. Riggs                                  |
| Vice      President and Chief Financial Officer of |
| Southwest      Royalties, Inc., the                |
| Managing      General Partner of                   |
| Southwest      Royalties, Inc. Income Fund VI      |
|                                               |
| November      16, 2009                             |
Editorial Note on Part 708b
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 708b appear at 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019, and at 85 FR 62213, Oct. 2, 2020.

§ 708b.1 Scope. ( a ) Subpart A of this part prescribes the procedures for merging one or more credit unions with a continuing credit union where at least one of the credit unions is federally insured.
( b ) Subpart B of this part prescribes the procedures and notice requirements for termination of federal insurance or conversion of federal insurance to non-Federal insurance, including termination or conversion resulting from a merger.
( c ) Subpart C prescribes required forms for use in conversion of federal insurance to non-Federal insurance.
( d ) Nothing in this part restricts or otherwise impairs the authority of the NCUA to approve a merger pursuant to section 205(h) of the Act.
( e ) This part does not address procedures or requirements that may be applicable under state law for a state credit union.
[70 FR 3288, Jan. 24, 2005, as amended at 85 FR 62213, Oct. 2, 2020]

Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 708b
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart C of part 708b appear at 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3310

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the depreciation 

recovery period for roof systems. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16, 2003

Mr. FOLEY (for himself, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. NUSSLE, Mr. HAYWORTH, 

Mr. MANZULLO, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. WELLER, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, 

Mr. DAVIS of Alabama, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. SHAW, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. 

PUTNAM, and Mr. MCKEON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce 

the depreciation recovery period for roof systems.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Realistic Roofing Tax 

5 Treatment Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEPRECIATION RECOVERY PERIOD FOR ROOF SYS7 TEMS. 

8 (a) 20-YEAR RECOVERY PERIOD.—Paragraph (3) of 

9 section 168(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re-
2

•HR 3310 IH 

1 lating to classification of certain property) is amended by 

2 adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

3 ‘‘(F) 20-YEAR PROPERTY.—The term ‘20-

4 year property’ includes any roof system.’’. 

5 (b) REQUIREMENT TO USE STRAIGHT LINE METH6 OD.—Paragraph (3) of section 168(b) of such Code is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new subpara8 graph: 

9 ‘‘(G) Any roof system.’’. 

10 (c) ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM.—The table contained in 

11 section 168(g)(3)(B) of such Code is amended by adding 

12 at the end the following new item:

‘‘(F) ....................................................................................... 20’’.

13 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 10(A)





Exhibit 10(a)





[WSL LETTERHEAD]











CONSENT OF WEINICK SANDERS LEVENTHAL & CO., LLP

(INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS)






We consent to the use in Amendment No 2 to the Registration Statement of
MedStrong International Corporation on Form SB-1 under the Securities Act of
1933 of our report dated March 12, 2001 and to the reference to our firm under
the heading “Experts” in the Prospectus.








	 	/s/ WEINICK SANDERS LEVENTHAL & CO., LLP






New York, New York

June 22, 2001