alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

p0831 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

138944 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138944 

 COA: 283288 

Wayne CC: 07-013696-FC 

RICKY ALLEN HYSELL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 11
AKSYS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
(a development stage enterprise)

Statement Regarding Computation of Net Loss Per Share


-------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                              Year ended December 31, 
                                         --------------------------------
                                              1998             1997
                                         --------------    -------------- 

Net loss                                 $ (17,154,727)    $ (13,506,602)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Weighted average common 
  shares outstanding                        14,653,953        13,791,236
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Net loss per share, basic and diluted    $       (1.17)    $       (0.98)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[110th Congress Public Law 58]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ058.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 561]]

Public Law 110-58
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  6301 Highway 58 in Harrison, Tennessee, as the ``Claude Ramsey Post 
            Office''. <<NOTE: Aug. 9, 2007 -  [H.R. 1260]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CLAUDE RAMSEY POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 6301 Highway 58 in Harrison, Tennessee, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Claude Ramsey Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Claude 
Ramsey Post Office''.

    Approved August 9, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1260:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            May 14, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### WINTHOP’S LESSEE *v.*GRIMES.

Records of fire lands — evidence—possession of wild land.

The records of die fire lands have been recorded in Huron county, and copies of such record made evidence; this makes the records themselves as good evidence as the copy.

A law of Connecticut, as to recording deeds in that state, for lands in Ohio, will not be regarded'in Ohio, infixing a rule of evidence; land in Ohio must be conveyed according to her own laws.

A claim of possession since 1808, soon after the Indian title was extinguished, and the payment of taxes since, is a sufficient possession of wild lands to recover upon in ejectment, against one claiming the land as new formed by the wash of the lake, and unappropriated. One tenant in common may maintain ejectment against a wrong-doer.

Ejectment, to recover Cedar Point, near Sandusky Bay, in the Fire lands. The plaintiff, in making out his title, offered in evidence the list of the fire sufferers, in *Swan’s Land Laws,*82, and the records of the Fire Land Company.

Coffinberry,

objected, that they were incompetent.

*331Coffinberry,

objected.

jF. *D. Parish,*for the plaintiff.

He cited 3 *JohnR.*375; 9 *John. R.*128.

*Coffinberry*and *Beecher,*for the defendant.

By the Court.

The act of assembly of the 20thFebruary, 1812,. *{O.*Lawd Law», 109) expressly makes the proceedings of this company a part of the records of Huron county, and declares certified copies made by the recorder *évidence.*This makes the records themselves evidence also, for it cannot be seriously urged, that a copy would in any case be held better evidence than the original.

In the further progress of the cause, the plaintiff offered a copy of a deed recorded in the town of New London, in the state of Connecticut, with an act of Connecticut, requiring deeds to be recorded.

By the Court. The title- to lands within this state is to be determined by our laws, not those of Connecticut. The legislature of that state have no power to determine what shall be evidence in this; the evidence is rejected.

It was claimed by the defendant, that Cedar Point was wild unappropriated land, continually making by the casting up of sand by the waters of the Lake; was neither surv eyed nor estimated by the Land Company, and that the *defendantfirst took possession,*and appropriated it to his own use, &c.

The plaintiff then proved that those under whom he claimed, took possession in 1808, shortly after the Indian title was extinguished, and have since paid the taxes.

The cáse was argued by

Wood, J.

instructed the jury,

1st. That one tenant in common may maintain ejectment against a wrong-doer.

2d. That one having title to wild lands, who pays taxes, and exercises ownership over it, has such a possession that he may maintain ejectment.

Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.
#### § 614.4354 [Reserved]
§ 615.5461 Lost, stolen, destroyed, mutilated or defaced Farm Credit securities, including coupons. ( a ) Relief on the account of the loss, theft, destruction, mutilation, or defacement of any definitive consolidated or Systemwide securities of the Farm Credit banks and coupons of such securities may be granted on the same basis and to the same extent as relief may be granted under the statutes of the United States and the regulations of the Department of the Treasury on the account of the loss, theft, destruction, mutilation, or defacement of United States securities and coupons of such securities.
( b ) Applicants for relief under paragraph (a) of this section, shall present claims and proof of loss: ( 1 ) To the Division of Special Investments, Bureau of the Public Debt, P.O. Box 396, Parkersburg, WV 26102-0396, in the case of consolidated or Systemwide securities of the Farm Credit banks issued prior to May 1, 1978; or
( 2 ) To the Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation, 10 Exchange Place, Suite 1401, Jersey City, NJ 07302, in the case of consolidated or Systemwide securities issued on or after May 1, 1978.
EXHIBIT 32.02

Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 and in connection  with the annual report on
Form 10-K of Delta and Pine Land  Company for the fiscal  year ended  August 31,
2003, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  the  undersigned  R. D.  Greene,  the Vice  President-Finance,
Treasurer,  and Assistant  Secretary  hereby certifies the Report fully complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of D&PL.


     Signature                 Title                               Date

/s/ R.D. Greene         Vice President - Finance,          November 26, 2003
-------------------     Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
R. D. Greene            (Principal Financial and
                         Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) and the Statement of Operations
for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         195,240
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  248,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               443,970
<PP&E>                                       8,426,634
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,620,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,250,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,261
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,249,343
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,250,604
<SALES>                                        349,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               352,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                78,492
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                273,608
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            273,608
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   273,608
<EPS-BASIC>                                      12.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    12.31


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chell Group Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ending May 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Bolink,
Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)
1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                       By:       /s/ David Bolink
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                  DAVID BOLINK
                                            CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

November 30, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Chell Group Corporation and will
be retained by Chell Group Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2021103EN.01001001.xml

| 25.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/10

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 103/09)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 14 December 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85852 |
| Decision No | 158/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Additional compensation to TORP Sandefjord Airport |
| Legal basis | The aid award letter from the Ministry of Transport implementing appropriation of the Norwegian Parliament |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | To compensate part of the damage directly suffered by Sandefjord Lufthavn AS from 1 October 2020 to 31 December 2020 due to the public containment measures taken as a consequence of the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Form of aid | Grant |
| Budget | NOK 30 million |
| Intensity | 87 % (estimate) |
| Duration | 1 October 2020 – 31 December 2020 |
| Economic sectors | Aviation |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Ministry of Transport |
| Postboks 8010 Dep |
| N-0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

14 December 2020

Case No

85852

Decision No

158/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Additional compensation to TORP Sandefjord Airport

Legal basis

The aid award letter from the Ministry of Transport implementing appropriation of the Norwegian Parliament

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

To compensate part of the damage directly suffered by Sandefjord Lufthavn AS from 1 October 2020 to 31 December 2020 due to the public containment measures taken as a consequence of the COVID-19 outbreak

Form of aid

Grant

Budget

NOK 30 million

Intensity

87 % (estimate)

Duration

1 October 2020 – 31 December 2020

Economic sectors

Aviation

Name and address of the granting authority

The Ministry of Transport

Postboks 8010 Dep

N-0030 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
§ 652.95 Failure to meet capital requirements. ( a ) *Determination and notice.* At any time, we may determine that you are not meeting your risk-based capital level calculated according to § 652.65, your minimum capital requirements specified in section 8.33 of the Act, or your critical capital requirements specified in section 8.34 of the Act. We will notify you in writing of this fact and the date by which you should be in compliance (if applicable).
( b ) *Submission of capital restoration plan.* Our determination that you are not meeting your required capital levels may require you to develop and submit to us, within a specified time period, an acceptable plan to reach the appropriate capital level(s) by the date required.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.3489
<CASH>                                       2,180,444
<SECURITIES>                                 2,866,125
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,239,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                    46,500
<INVENTORY>                                    862,864
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,538,516
<PP&E>                                       3,978,811
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,472,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,953,148
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,523
<COMMON>                                       150,187
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,867,042
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,472,022
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,222,524
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  744,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                295,583
<INCOME-TAX>                                   144,265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            151,318
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   151,318
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 4, 2009 / Presidential Documents 6113 

Executive Order 13497 of January 30, 2009 

Revocation of Certain Executive Orders Concerning Regulatory Planning and Review 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered that: 

Section 1. Executive Order 13258 of February 26, 2002, and Executive Order 

13422 of January 18, 2007, concerning regulatory planning and review, which 

amended Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993, are revoked. 

Sec. 2. The Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the 

heads of executive departments and agencies shall promptly rescind any 

orders, rules, regulations, guidelines, or policies implementing or enforcing 

Executive Order 13258 or Executive Order 13422, to the extent consistent 

with law. 

Sec. 3. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or 

benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any 

party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its 

officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

January 30, 2009. 

[FR Doc. E9–2486 

Filed 2–3–09; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–W9–P 


OB#1.EPS</GPH>
Fw: Avenal Power Plant

Julie Walters to: Shirley Rivera 03/02/2011 03:43 PM

Cc: Amy Parsley, Andrew Chew

Shirley,

As discussed, the author of this Sierra Club letter should be added to the "C list" and receive this week's 

public notice.

Thanks,

Julie

**********************************************************

Julie Walters

Assistant Regional Counsel

USEPA, Region 9

75 Hawthorne St., Mail Code ORC-2 

San Francisco, CA 94105

Email: walters.julie@epa.gov

Direct Dial: 415-972-3892

Fax: 415-947-3570

***********************************************************

----- Forwarded by Julie Walters/R9/USEPA/US on 03/02/2011 03:40 PM -----

From: Travis Ritchie <Travis.Ritchie@sierraclub.org>

To: Gina McCarthy/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, stephanie.talbert@usdoj.gov, Brian 

Doster/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Julie Walters/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Pat Gallagher <Pat.Gallagher@sierraclub.org>, Bruce Nilles <Bruce.Nilles@sierraclub.org>, Gloria 

Smith <Gloria.Smith@sierraclub.org>

Date: 02/25/2011 08:44 PM

Subject: Avenal Power Plant

Please find the attached correspondence from the Sierra Club regarding the Avenal Power Plant in 

California. 

Travis Ritchie

Associate Attorney

Sierra Club

Environmental Law Program 

85 Second St., 2nd Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

travis.ritchie@sierraclub.org

Tel: 415-977-5727
§ 652.60 Corporate business planning. ( a ) Farmer Mac's board of directors is responsible for ensuring that Farmer Mac maintain capital at a level that is sufficient to ensure continued financial viability and provide for growth. In addition, Farmer Mac's capital must be sufficient to meet statutory and regulatory requirements as well as the goals and objectives required by paragraph (b)(5) of this section, including the Tier 1 ratio required in § 652.61(c)(2)(ii)(A). Farmer Mac must notify the OSMO within 10 calendar days of determining that capital is not sufficient to meet those goals and objectives.
( b ) No later than 65 days after the end of each calendar year, Farmer Mac's board of directors must adopt an operational and strategic business plan for at least the next 3 years. The plan must include: ( 1 ) A mission statement;
( 2 ) A business and organizational overview and an assessment of management capabilities;
( 3 ) An assessment of Farmer Mac's strengths and weaknesses;
( 4 ) A review of the internal and external factors that are likely to affect Farmer Mac during the planning period;
( 5 ) Measurable goals and objectives;
( 6 ) A discussion of how these factors might impact Farmer Mac's current financial position and business goals;
( 7 ) Forecasted income, expense, and balance sheet statements for each year of the plan;
( 8 ) A marketing plan, and
( 9 ) A capital plan in accordance with § 652.61.
[78 FR 65149, Oct. 31, 2013]
Supreme Court

No. 2016-342-M.P.

In the Matter of Oleg Nikolyszyn:

O R D E R

On October 12, 2016, this Court’s Chief Disciplinary Counsel filed a Petition for Interim 

Suspension which avers that the respondent, Oleg Nikolyszyn, a member of the Rhode Island 

Bar, has engaged in serious professional misconduct. The respondent has requested that he be 

allowed to resign from the practice of law in lieu of being suspended on an interim basis, while 

acknowledging that he would remain subject to the disciplinary authority of the Court for any 

professional misconduct he may have committed while a member of the Bar.

This Court considered the Petition for Interim Suspension and the respondent’s request to 

resign at our conference on November 7, 2016. Having heard the representations of disciplinary 

counsel, the respondent, and his attorney, we deem that the petition filed by disciplinary counsel 

should be granted.

Accordingly it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the respondent, Oleg Nikolyszyn, is 

hereby suspended from the practice of law in this state until further order of this Court.

It is further ordered that David D. Curtin, Chief Disciplinary Counsel, be appointed as 

Special Master to take possession of the respondent’s client files and accounts; to inventory 

them; and to take whatever steps are necessary to protect the clients’ interests.

Chief Justice Suttell did not participate.

Entered as an Order of this Court this 1st day of December, 2016.

By Order,

______________/s/_________________

 Clerk
RHODE ISLAND SUPREME COURT CLERK’S OFFICE

Clerk’s Office Order/Opinion Cover Sheet

TITLE OF CASE: In the Matter of Oleg Nikolyszyn.

 

CASE NO: No. 2016-342-M.P.

COURT: Supreme Court

DATE ORDER FILED: December 1, 2016

JUSTICES: Goldberg, Flaherty, Robinson, and Indeglia, JJ.

WRITTEN BY: N/A – Court Order

JUDGE FROM LOWER COURT:

 N/A

ATTORNEYS ON APPEAL:

 For Petitioner: David D. Curtin, Esq.

 Disciplinary Counsel

For Respondent: Dennis S. Baluch, Esq.