53442 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 200 / Monday, October 19, 2009 / Proposed Rules 

serial numbers on which Airbus modification 

48825 has been embodied in production, 

except those on which Airbus modification 

57409 has been embodied in production. 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 92. 

Reason 

(e) The mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) states: 

In the door 2 area, the hat-racks are 

supplied with a basic wire harness which 

includes ‘‘Oxygen Masks’’ activation. 

In case of a monument installation, the 

respective non-used hat-rack connections 

between monument and outer skin are put on 

stow. It was noticed in production, that the 

distance between the stowed wire harness 

and the monument could be too small. This 

condition, if not corrected, could lead to the 

short circuit of wires dedicated to oxygen, 

which, in case of emergency, could result in 

a large number of passenger oxygen masks 

not being supplied with oxygen, possibly 

causing personal injuries. 

For the reasons described above, this AD 

requires the modification of the hat rack 

connectors on stow, and the rerouting of the 

associated wire harness in case of monument 

installed in door 2 area. 

Actions and Compliance 

(f) Unless already done, do the following 

actions. 

(1) Within 24 months after the effective 

date of this AD, modify both the left-hand (L/ 

H) and right-hand (R/H) hat-rack connectors 

in accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service 

Bulletin A330–92–3070, Revision 01, dated 

January 12, 2009; or Airbus Mandatory 

Service Bulletin A340–92–4073, Revision 01, 

dated January 13, 2009; as applicable, except 

as provided by paragraph (f)(2) of this AD. 

(2) Modifications done before the effective 

date of this AD, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus 

Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–92–3070 

or A340–92–4073, both dated July 10, 2008, 

as applicable, are acceptable for compliance 

with the applicable requirements of 

paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, provided that 

within 24 months after the effective date of 

this AD, the ‘‘ADDITIONAL WORK’’ 

specified in Airbus Mandatory Service 

Bulletin A330–92–3070, Revision 01, dated 

January 12, 2009; or Airbus Mandatory 

Service Bulletin A340–92–4073, Revision 01, 

dated January 13, 2009; as applicable; is 

accomplished in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus 

Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–92–3070, 

Revision 01, dated January 12, 2009; or 

Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–92– 

4073, Revision 01, dated January 13, 2009; as 

applicable. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI 

and/or service information as follows: No 

differences. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(g) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Send information to ATTN: Vladimir 

Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 

Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone 

(425) 227–1138; fax (425) 227–1149. Before 

using any approved AMOC on any airplane 

to which the AMOC applies, notify your 

principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or 

principal avionics inspector (PAI), as 

appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, 

your local Flight Standards District Office. 

The AMOC approval letter must specifically 

reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 

the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 

has approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation 

Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2009– 

0077, dated April 6, 2009; Airbus Mandatory 

Service Bulletin A330–92–3070, Revision 01, 

dated January 12, 2009; and Airbus 

Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–92–4073, 

Revision 01, dated January 13, 2009; for 

related information. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 

5, 2009. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–24988 Filed 10–16–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–0913; Directorate 

Identifier 2009–NM–101–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing 

Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800, and 

–900 Series Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Boeing Model 737–600, –700, –700C, 

–800, and –900 series airplanes. This 

proposed AD would require inspections 

for scribe lines in the fuselage skin at 

lap joints, the splice strap at certain butt 

joints, the skin or doubler at certain 

approved repair doublers, and the skin 

at decal locations; and related 

investigative and corrective actions if 

necessary. This proposed AD results 

from reports of scribe line damage found 

adjacent to the skin lap joints, decals, 

and wing-to-body fairings. We are 

proposing this AD to detect and correct 

scribe lines, which can develop into 

fatigue cracks in the skin. Undetected 

fatigue cracks can grow and cause 

sudden decompression of the airplane. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by December 3, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, 

MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124– 

2207; telephone 206–544–5000, 

extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail 

me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet 

https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You 

may review copies of the referenced 

service information at the FAA, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. 

For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 425–227– 

1221 or 425–227–1152. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Office 


cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 200 / Monday, October 19, 2009 / Proposed Rules 53443 

(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Wayne Lockett, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone 

(425) 917–6447; fax (425) 917–6590. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2009–0913; Directorate Identifier 

2009–NM–101–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

We have received reports indicating 

that scribe lines have been found by 

multiple operators on Boeing Model 

737–600, –700, –700C, –800, and –900 

series airplanes. The scribe lines appear 

to have been made on the skin when 

sealant was removed as part of 

preparing the airplane for repainting. 

One Model 737–700 operator reported 

scribe lines found around the wing-tobody fairing between stringer 26L and 

stringer 25R at station (STA) 727D to 

STA 727E. A second Model 737–700 

operator reported six vertical scribe 

lines up to 42 inches long on the upper 

aft fuselage between stringer 5R and 

stringer 9R at STA 847 to STA 887. 

Another 737–700 operator reported 

scribe lines along stringer 24L and 

stringer 24R between STA 178 to STA 

500B. The depth of the scribe lines 

ranged from 0.001 inch to 0.004 inch. 

The airplanes had accumulated between 

595 and 17,571 total flight cycles. No 

cracks as a result of scribe lines found 

on Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800, 

and –900 airplanes have been reported 

to Boeing. 

Related ADs 

This proposed AD is similar to two 

existing ADs. AD 2006–07–12, 

amendment 39–14539 (71 FR 16211, 

March 31, 2006), applies to Boeing 

Model 737–100, –200, –200C, –300, 

–400, and –500 series airplanes. AD 

2007–19–07, amendment 39–15198 (72 

FR 60244, October 24, 2007), applies to 

Boeing Model 757–200, –200PF, and 

–200CB series airplanes. Those ADs 

require inspections to detect scribe lines 

in the fuselage skin at certain lap joints, 

butt joints, external repair doublers, and 

other areas; and related investigative/ 

corrective actions if necessary. Those 

actions resulted from reports of fuselage 

skin cracks adjacent to the skin lap 

joints on airplanes that had scribe lines. 

Relevant Service Information 

We have reviewed Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 737–53A1289, dated 

January 14, 2009. That service bulletin 

describes procedures for inspecting for 

scribe lines in the fuselage skin at lap 

joints, the splice strap at certain butt 

joints, the skin or doubler at certain 

approved repair doublers, and the skin 

at decal locations. That service bulletin 

specifies removing paint and sealant 

from affected areas before the initial 

inspection. The service bulletin 

specifies that the compliance time for 

the inspections ranges between before 

accumulating 14,000 total flight cycles 

plus the first scribe line opportunity, 

and 75,000 total flight cycles, depending 

on the inspection location, or within 

4,000 flight cycles after the date the 

service bulletin was issued (whichever 

occurs later). 

That service bulletin specifies related 

investigative and corrective actions. The 

related investigative actions include 

performing repetitive detailed, high 

frequency eddy current, ultrasonic, and/ 

or ultrasonic phased array inspections 

of the scribe lines to detect cracks. The 

repetitive inspection interval ranges 

between 1,000 and 10,000 flight cycles, 

depending on the condition found. The 

corrective actions include repairing 

scribe lines and cracks. The service 

bulletin specifies to repair cracks before 

further flight. 

That service bulletin also specifies 

repairing scribe lines before further 

flight, except when a limited return to 

service (LRTS) program for qualifying 

scribe lines would allow return to 

service for a limited period before scribe 

lines are repaired. The LRTS program 

includes repetitive inspections to detect 

cracks where scribe lines are found. To 

qualify for an LRTS program, scribe 

lines must meet certain criteria based on 

their depth and location. That service 

bulletin specifies final repair by using 

the structural repair manual or 

contacting Boeing for instructions, 

which would eliminate the need for the 

repetitive inspections of the LRTS 

program. The repetitive intervals for the 

LRTS program range from 2,500 flight 

cycles to 10,000 flight cycles after the 

scribe line is found, depending on the 

inspection location. 

That service bulletin notes that 

certain inspections would not be 

necessary under the following 

conditions: 

• The airplane has never been 

stripped or repainted, or the airplane 

was stripped or repainted after July 1, 

2007. 

• The airplane has never had decals 

installed, or decals were installed after 

July 1, 2007. 

• For each repair, the airplane has 

never been stripped or repainted since 

the repair was installed or the repair 

was installed after July 1, 2007. 

• The area under the wing-to-body 

fairings has never been stripped or 

repainted or the airplane was stripped 

or repainted after July 1, 2007. 

• No sealant has been removed except 

in accordance with the specified sealant 

removal processes given in Appendix A 

of the service bulletin. 

That service bulletin specifies 

submitting inspection results to Boeing. 

The service bulletin also provides 

procedures for addressing scribe lines 

detected before the initial inspection 

threshold. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This Proposed AD 

We are proposing this AD because we 

evaluated all relevant information and 

determined the unsafe condition 

described previously is likely to exist or 

develop in other products of the same 

type design. This proposed AD would 

require accomplishing the actions 

specified in the service information 

described previously, except as 

discussed under ‘‘Differences Between 

the Proposed AD and Service Bulletin.’’ 

The proposed AD would also require 

sending the inspection results to Boeing. 

Differences Between the Proposed AD 

and Service Bulletin 

Where the service bulletin specifies 

contacting the manufacturer for 

instructions on how to repair certain 

conditions, this proposed AD would 

require repairing those conditions in 

one of the following ways: 

• Using a method that we approve; or 

• Using data that meet the 

certification basis of the airplane, and 

that have been approved by an 

Authorized Representative for the 


cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
53444 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 200 / Monday, October 19, 2009 / Proposed Rules 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes 

Delegation Option Authorization 

Organization whom we have authorized 

to make those findings. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

would affect 782 airplanes of U.S. 

registry. The following table provides 

the estimated costs for U.S. operators to 

comply with this proposed AD. 

TABLE—ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Work hours 

Average 

labor rate 

per hour 

Parts Cost per product 

Number of 

U.S.- 

registered 

airplanes 

Fleet cost 

Inspection 53 $80 $0 $4,240 per inspection cycle ........... 782 $3,315,680 per inspection cycle. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

You can find our regulatory 

evaluation and the estimated costs of 

compliance in the AD Docket. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2009–0913; 

Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–101–AD. 

Comments Due Date 

(a) We must receive comments by 

December 3, 2009. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737– 

600, –700, –700C, –800, and –900 series 

airplanes, certificated in any category, as 

identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

737–53A1289, dated January 14, 2009. 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 53: Fuselage. 

Unsafe Condition 

(e) This AD results from reports of scribe 

line damage found adjacent to the skin lap 

joints, decals, and wing-to-body fairings. The 

Federal Aviation Administration is issuing 

this AD to detect and correct scribe lines, 

which can develop into fatigue cracks in the 

skin. Undetected fatigue cracks can grow and 

cause sudden decompression of the airplane. 

Compliance 

(f) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Inspection 

(g) At the applicable times specified in 

paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing 

Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1289, dated 

January 14, 2009 (‘‘the service bulletin’’), 

except as provided in paragraph (h) of this 

AD, do detailed external inspections for 

scribe lines in the fuselage skin at lap joints, 

the splice strap at certain butt joints, the skin 

or doubler at certain approved repair 

doublers, and the skin at decals; and do all 

applicable related investigative and 

corrective actions, by accomplishing all 

actions specified in the Accomplishment 

Instructions of the service bulletin, except as 

provided by paragraph (i) of this AD. 

Note 1: The inspection exceptions 

described in subparagraphs 1.a. through 1.e. 

in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing 

Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1289, dated 

January 14, 2009, apply to this AD. 

Exceptions to Service Bulletin Specifications 

(h) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

737–53A1289, dated January 14, 2009, 

specifies a compliance time after the date on 

the service bulletin, this AD requires 

compliance within the specified compliance 

time after the effective date of this AD. 

(i) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

737–53A1289, dated January 14, 2009, 

specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate 

action, accomplish applicable actions using a 

method approved in accordance with the 

procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this 

AD. 

Report 

(j) At the applicable time specified in 

paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD: Submit 

a report of the findings (both positive and 

negative) of the inspections required by 

paragraph (g) of this AD. You may use 

Appendix B of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

737–53A1289, dated January 14, 2009. Send 

the report to Boeing Commercial Airplanes, 

P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124– 

2207. The report must contain, at a 

minimum, the inspection results, a 

description of any discrepancies found, the 

airplane serial number, and the number of 

flight cycles and flight hours on the airplane. 

Under the provisions of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the 

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements contained in this AD and has 

assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056. 


cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 200 / Monday, October 19, 2009 / Proposed Rules 53445 

(1) If the inspection was done on or after 

the effective date of this AD: Submit the 

report within 30 days after the inspection. 

(2) If the inspection was done before the 

effective date of this AD: Submit the report 

within 30 days after the effective date of this 

AD. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(k)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Send information to ATTN: Wayne Lockett, 

Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM– 

120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification 

Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 

917–6447; fax (425) 917–6590. Or, e-mail 

information to 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. 

(2) To request a different method of 

compliance or a different compliance time 

for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 

39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on 

any airplane to which the AMOC applies, 

notify your principal maintenance inspector 

(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), 

as appropriate, or lacking a principal 

inspector, your local Flight Standards District 

Office. The AMOC approval letter must 

specifically reference this AD. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD, if it is approved by an 

Authorized Representative for the Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option 

Authorization Organization who has been 

authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to 

make those findings. For a repair method to 

be approved, the repair must meet the 

certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 

5, 2009. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–24986 Filed 10–16–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 82 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0664; FRL–8969–7] 

RIN 2060–AP11 

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: 

New Substitute in the Motor Vehicle Air 

Conditioning Sector Under the 

Significant New Alternatives Policy 

(SNAP) Program 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Clean Air Act requires 

the Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) to review alternatives for ozonedepleting substances and to approve of 

substitutes that do not present a risk 

more significant than other alternatives 

that are available. Under that authority, 

the Significant New Alternatives Policy 

(SNAP) program of EPA proposes to 

expand the list of acceptable substitutes 

for ozone-depleting substances (ODS). 

The substitute addressed in this 

proposal is for the motor vehicle air 

conditioning (MVAC) end-use within 

the refrigeration and air-conditioning 

sector. EPA proposes to find HFO– 

1234yf acceptable, subject to use 

conditions as a substitute for CFC–12 in 

motor vehicle air conditioning. The 

proposed substitute is a non ozonedepleting gas and consequently does not 

contribute to stratospheric ozone 

depletion. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before December 18, 2009, unless a 

public hearing is requested. Comments 

must then be received on or before 

January 4, 2010. Any party requesting a 

public hearing must notify the contact 

listed below under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT by 5 p.m. Eastern 

Daylight Time on October 29, 2009. If a 

hearing is held, it will take place on 

November 3, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2008–0664, by one of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• E-mail: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (202) 566–1741. 

• Mail: Environmental Protection 

Agency. EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), 

Mailcode 6102T, Attention Docket ID 

No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0664, 1200 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20460. 

• Hand Delivery: Public Reading 

Room, Room 3334, EPA West Building, 

1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC. 

Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Docket’s normal hours of 

operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008– 

0664. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, 

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., 

NW., Washington, DC. This Docket 

Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 

p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 

legal holidays. The telephone number 

for the Public Reading Room is (202) 

566–1744, and the telephone number for 

the Air Docket is (202) 566–1742. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

further information about this proposed 

rule, contact Margaret Sheppard, 

Stratospheric Protection Division, Office 

of Atmospheric Programs; 

Environmental Protection Agency, Mail 

Code 6205J, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue 

NW., Washington DC 20460; telephone 

number (202) 343–9163, fax number, 

(202) 343–2338; e-mail address at 

sheppard.margaret@epa.gov. Notices 

and rulemakings under the SNAP 

program are available on EPA’s 

Stratospheric Ozone Web site at http:// 

www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/ 

regulations.html. For copies of the full 

list of SNAP decisions in all industrial 


cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS