alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 200 (Monday, October 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25076]



[[Page 53513]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Safe Drinking Water 
Act

    Notice is hereby given that on October 2, 2009, a proposed consent 
decree in United States v. East Shoshone County Water District, Civil 
Action No. 09-00499-EJL, was lodged with the United States District 
Court for the District of Idaho.
    In this action the United States sought injunctive relief and a 
civil penalty for violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act at the East 
Shoshone County Water District's public water system in Burke Canyon 
near Wallace, Idaho. The Water District has agreed to install a 
filtration system and to perform other injunctive relief. Additionally, 
the Water District will pay a $5,000 civil penalty and will perform an 
environmental project that is estimated to cost approximately $20,000.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the decree. 
Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, and either emailed to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2c2c7d0d1dddfdfd7dcc69fd7d7c19cd7dcc0d6f2c7c1d6ddd89cd5ddc4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbcbced9d8d4d6d6ded5cf96dedec895ded5c9dffbcec8dfd4d195dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a> or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to 
United States v. East Shoshone County Water District, Civil Action No. 
09-00499-EJL, DOJ Ref. 90-5-1-1-08453.
    During the public comment period, the consent decree may be 
examined on the following Department of Justice Web site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the decree may also 
be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, 
U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611 or by faxing or 
e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#780c17161119561e141d1d0c0f17171c380d0b1c1712561f170e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="83f7ecedeae2ade5efe6e6f7f4ecece7c3f6f0e7ece9ade4ecf5">[email protected]</span></a>), fax 
no. (202) 514-0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514-1547. In 
requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a 
check in the amount of $7.00 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) 
payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if by email or fax, forward a check in 
that amount to the Consent Decree Library at the stated address.

Maureen M. Katz,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. E9-25076 Filed 10-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### TAYLOR, ET AL. *v.*FOOTE’S ADMINISTRATORS.

Vender’s lien — cannot be assigned.

Notes given for the purchase money of land, cannot be enforced as a lien upon the land, in the hands of an assignee.

Liens for the purchase money, are in the vender only, and cannot be assigned.

Bill in Chancery, to enforce a lien upon land sold for the payment of notes, which were transferred by the vender to the complainant, in payment of a debt. The notes were not negotiable.

*Case,*for the complainants.

*S. J. Andrews,*contra.

Bv the Court.

These notes, though not negotiable at law, so as to confer upon the assignee a right to sue in his own name, are held in equity as negotiated. The lien for the purchase money is a right of the vender, and cannot pass into other hands as an incident to the obligations, or the land, if conveyed by the «vender; *Jackman*v. *Hallock,*1 O. *R.*319; and *Tiernan*v. *Beam,*2 *O. R.*383, are conclusive on this point; so is *Williams*v. *Roberts,*5 *O. R.*35.

The bill is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>I
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Consolidated   Balance  Sheet  of  The  WellCare   Management  Group,  Inc.  and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and the related Statement of Operations for
the period  ended  December  30,  1998,  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                               6,393
<SECURITIES>                                             2
<RECEIVABLES>                                        5,048
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,808
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    10,950
<PP&E>                                              15,467
<DEPRECIATION>                                       7,758
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      29,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               38,071
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                75
<OTHER-SE>                                         (27,783)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        29,939
<SALES>                                            142,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   144,449
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      129,494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    40,372
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2,851
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,730
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (25,417)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5,441
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (30,858)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (30,858)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (4.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (4.36)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Transnational Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Paul L. Dailey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


/s/ Paul L. Dailey
------------------
Paul L. Dailey
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: December 14, 2003

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
§ 614.4337 Disclosure to borrowers. When a loan or an interest in a loan other than a participation interest is sold with servicing rights, the disclosure shall be made to the borrower in accordance with this section: ( a ) The selling institution shall disclose to the borrower at least 10 days prior to the borrower's next payment date; ( 1 ) The name, address, and telephone number of the purchasing institution;
( 2 ) The name and address of the party to whom payment is to be made;
( 3 ) A description of the impact of the sale on statutory borrower rights after the sale;
( 4 ) Any terms in the agreement that would permit a purchaser to change the terms or conditions of the loan.
( b ) A Farm Credit System institution that purchases a loan or a non-participation interest therein shall not take any servicing action that adversely affects the borrower until it ensures that disclosure has been made to the borrower of: ( 1 ) The name, address, and telephone number of the purchasing institution; and
( 2 ) The address where the payment should be sent.
###### Editorial Note on Part 710

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 710 appear at 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 710.8 Certificate of dissolution and liquidation.

Within 120 days after the final distribution of assets to members is started, a duly executed Certificate of Dissolution and Liquidation shall be filed with the Regional Director.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3505 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3505

   To amend the Bend Pine Nursery Land Conveyance Act to specify the 
 recipients and consideration for conveyance of the Bend Pine Nursery, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2003

Mr. Walden of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                     to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Bend Pine Nursery Land Conveyance Act to specify the 
 recipients and consideration for conveyance of the Bend Pine Nursery, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF BEND PINE NURSERY LAND CONVEYANCE.

    Section 3 of the Bend Pine Nursery Land Conveyance Act (Public Law 
106-526; 114 Stat. 2512) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``210 acres'' and 
        inserting ``185 acres'';
            (2) in subsection (e), by striking paragraph (3); and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Special Requirements for Bend Pine Nursery Conveyance.--
            ``(1) Conveyance to park and recreation district.--The 
        Secretary shall offer to sell to the Bend Metro Park and 
        Recreation District in Deschutes County, Oregon, for 
        consideration in the amount of $3,505,676, all right, title, 
        and interest of the United States in and to approximately 170 
        acres of the parcel of land identified as Tract A in subsection 
        (a)(1). The land conveyed to the Bend Metro Park and Recreation 
        District shall be used only for recreation purposes and may be 
        developed for those purposes.
            ``(2) Conveyance to school district.--In accordance with 
        section 202 of the Education Land Grant Act (16 U.S.C. 479a), 
        the Secretary shall convey to the Administrative School 
        District No. 1, Deschutes County, Oregon, without 
        consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United 
        States in and to approximately 15 acres of land in the 
        northwest corner of the parcel of land identified as Tract A in 
        subsection (a)(1). The land conveyed to the School District 
        shall be used only for educational purposes.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Natuzzi S.p.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                |  |                         
|------ |  | -------------- |  | ------------------------
|Dated: |  | April 30, 2012 |  | /s/ Pasquale Natuzzi    
|       |  |                |  | Pasquale Natuzzi        
|       |  |                |  | Chief Executive Officer 
|       |  |               
|Dated: |  | April 30, 2012 |  | /s/ Vittorio Notarpietro
|       |  |                |  | Vittorio Notarpietro    
|       |  |                |  | Chief Financial Officer 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Natuzzi
S.p.A. and will be retained by Natuzzi S.p.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 722.1 Authority, purpose, and scope. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 64575 , Aug. 7, 2024.
( a ) *Authority.* Part 722 is issued by the National Credit Union Administration (“NCUA”) under title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”) (Pub. L. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183, 1989) and 12 U.S.C. 1757 and 1766.
( b ) *Purpose and scope.* ( 1 ) Title XI provides protection for federal financial and public policy interests in real estate-related transactions by requiring real estate appraisals used in connection with federally related transactions to be performed in writing, in accordance with uniform standards, by appraisers whose competency has been demonstrated and whose professional conduct will be subject to effective supervision. This part implements the requirements of title XI and applies to all federally related transactions entered into by the National Credit Union Administration or by federally insured credit unions (“regulated institutions”).
( 2 ) This part: ( i ) Identifies which real estate-related financial transactions require the services of an appraiser;
( ii ) Prescribes which categories of federally related transactions shall be appraised by a state-certified appraiser and which by a state-licensed appraiser; and
( iii ) Prescribes minimum standards for the performance of real estate appraisals in connection with federally related transactions under the jurisdiction of the National Credit Union Administration.
#### Nealey Augusta, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion Filed January 23, 1923.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Volusia County; James W. Perkins, Judge..

*J. E. Peacock*and *Scarlett*& *Jordan,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Rivers Buford,*Attorney General, and *Marvin C. McIntosh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

The record of the conviction of the plaintiff in cx-rov of murder in the first degree discloses no material error that could l-easonably have , prejudiced the rights of the defendant in the trial; and as the evidence *73amply sustains the verdict, the judgment entered thereon accords with law and is affirmed.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne and West, J. J., concur.
#### Emanuel Kind, Respondent, *v.*Alexander S. Bacon, Appellant.

Appeal from judgment entered on a verdict directed by the court.

Nichols & Bacon, for appellant.

Menken Bros., for respondent.

Hascall, J.

The action is brought to enforce an alleged *pro rata*liability of the defendant as an underwriter on a Lloyds insurance policy.

The complaint neither alleges, nor do the proofs show, how many individual underwriters there were to be affected, nor what the proportion was, but claims that defendant’s liability amounted to $97.14. The answer denies most of the allegations and pleads another action, pending in favor of one Cuff, to recover upon the same policy against the same defendant, and under the same allegations. The policy of insurance was not offered in evidence. Plaintiff alleged an assignment to him of the cause of action, but offered no proof thereof —• production of a judgment roll, in an action against the attorneys in fact named in the policy, containing the complaint which alleged an assignment of the entire claim to Cuff, under a policy the subject of the action, was not proof of an assignment of the claim to Kind against the appellant Bacon. It is a good defense that the case of Cuff v. Bacon was *801still pending, and the exception duly protected the defendant on appeal. The plaintiff quite failed to make out his case, and, while it was error not to let defendant go to the jury, we proceed further and hold the defendant entitled to even greater relief on the record. We think that the Supreme Court had no right nor power to assume in one action to order the discontinuance of another, without notice to or consent by the party defendant herein.

The judgment appealed from should be reversed, with costs of appeal and the complaint dismissed1 with costs of the action.

Fitzsimons, Oh. J., and O’Dwyer, J., concur.

Judgment reversed, with costs of appeal and complaint dismissed, with costs of action.
EXHIBIT J

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 1 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 2 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 3 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 4 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 5 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 6 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 7 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 8 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 9 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 10 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 11 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 12 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 13 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 14 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 15 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 16 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 17 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 18 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 19 of 20
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19997-1 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:09:18 Desc:

Exhibit J - Iris Garcia Page 20 of 20
EXHIBIT 12.1CERTIFICATIONI, Eivind Reiten, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Norsk Hydro ASA; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal controls over financial reporting.   Oslo, 16 March 2007     /s/ Eivind Reiten      Eivind Reiten       President and Chief Executive Officer