alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed balance sheets and unaudited condensed statements of
income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to
date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,132,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,227,000
<PP&E>                                         112,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,355,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          261,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     9,831,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (8,755,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,355,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               645,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (628,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (628,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (628,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.05)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

     We consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in: (i) the  Registration
Statement  (Form S-8  Registration  No.  33-93480)  pertaining to the 1989 Stock
Option Plan, as amended (the "Option  Plan");  the 1995 Employee  Stock Purchase
Plan (the "Purchase  Plan");  and 51,000 shares  issuable under certain  options
granted  outside the Option Plan in February 1995 (the "February 1995 Options");
(ii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Registration No. 333-15529) pertaining
to the 1996 Non-Employee  Directors Stock Option Plan (the "Non-Employee  Plan")
and the 1996 Stock Plan (the "Stock  Plan");  (iii) the  Registration  Statement
(Post  Effective  Amendment  No. 1 to Form S-8/S-8  Registration  No.  333-8416)
pertaining to the Option Plan; the Purchase Plan; the February 1995 Options; the
Non-Employee  Plan;  the Stock Plan;  49,808 shares  issuable under that certain
warrant  granted in December 1994;  15,000 shares issuable under certain options
granted  outside the Option Plan,  the Stock Plan and the  Non-Employee  Plan in
June 1996;  1,667 shares  issuable  under certain  options  granted  outside the
Option Plan,  the Stock Plan and the  Non-Employee  Plan in December  1996;  and
83,067 shares  issuable under certain  options  granted outside the Option Plan,
the  Stock  Plan  and the  Non-Employee  Plan in  February  1998;  and  (iv) the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 Registration No. 33-61402) pertaining to shares
of common stock  issuable  upon the  conversion  of shares of Series A Preferred
Stock of our report dated February 8, 2000,  except for Note 13, as to which the
date is April 14, 2000, with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements
and  schedule  of Storage  Engine,  Inc.  for the year ended  December  31, 1999
included in the Annual  Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended  December 31, 2001
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.






                                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


MetroPark, New Jersey
March 28, 2002
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19886-1 Filed:01/21/22 Entered:01/25/22 14:57:45 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 1
Exhibit A

Summary of Fees Incurred by Professional

Professional Position* Billing Rate* Hours 100% of Fees

Martinez, Scott Director $ 1,020.00 271.7 $ 261,826.50

Deichmann, Eric Director $ 950.00 4.4 3,696.00

Kardos, Elizabeth S Partner $ 800.00 1.5 1,125.00

Yenumula, Rahul Senior Vice President $ 735.00 3.4 2,380.00

Praga, Deborah Senior Vice President $ 655.00 5.8 3,799.00

Saydah, Heather Senior Vice President $ 550.00 1.8 918.00

Filler, Brooke Vice President $ 510.00 36.5 17,702.50

Braverman, Jennifer Vice President $ 460.00 28.4 13,064.00

Total 353.5 $ 304,511.00

*Reflects positions and billing rates in effect as of January 1, 2023.

EXHIBIT A: SUMMARY OF FEES INCURRED BY PROFESSIONAL

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23812-1 Filed:03/15/23 Entered:03/15/23 18:05:23 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,141
<SECURITIES>                                   117,961
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                       205
<INVENTORY>                                     22,578
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               183,591
<PP&E>                                          25,951
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 197,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,215
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           182
<OTHER-SE>                                     173,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   197,866
<SALES>                                        151,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               151,950
<CGS>                                           79,666
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  38
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,701
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,459
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,459
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.36
        



</TABLE>
FILED

January 16, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

JODY TRISTAN SMILEY, )

and BEVERLY J. SIMPSON, )

)

Plaintiffs/Appellants ) Davidson Juvenile

) No. 9619-17777

VS. )

) Appeal No.

STACY MARCY WALKER HANNAH, ) 01A01-9704-JV-00164

)

Defendant/Appellee. )

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur with the results of the court’s opinion in this case but file this separate

opinion to address the court’s concern that the record and the briefs do not explain

why the child’s surname is “Walker.” While this concern is not germane to any of

the issues on this appeal, the record contains the explanation the court is seeking.

Stacy March Hannah’s maiden name is “Walker.” Because she was unmarried when

her son was born, Tenn. Code Ann. § 68-3-305(b)(1) (Supp. 1997) required that the

boy be given his mother’s surname.

_______________________________

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22829 Filed:11/04/22 Entered:11/09/22 10:12:37 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22829 Filed:11/04/22 Entered:11/09/22 10:12:37 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22829 Filed:11/04/22 Entered:11/09/22 10:12:37 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22829 Filed:11/04/22 Entered:11/09/22 10:12:37 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22829 Filed:11/04/22 Entered:11/09/22 10:12:37 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22829 Filed:11/04/22 Entered:11/09/22 10:12:37 Desc: Main

Document Page 6 of 6
ROE RI0E RIE RIE RISE RUE RISE RIE RITE RISE
4 =F ] N
+
12 1 w. €
s CRO RI
. 26) $
a - 5 i) 5 10
. | ————
+
13 _ 5 5 10
s
KILOMETERS
Jefferson County x —
< _ ~ Deschutes County] CrgoyCounty 7]
7 Z ]
J g a - Ter
a se 9 LOOKED, Prineville ¢ i
s / Cy | BS
| ‘Ochoco “| |_|
Reservoir
; (126) “
t Sisters' . 3 S. Powell 426) 680)
45 & 1 Butte
* | DESCHUTES r* 2
te oe uy “
- fy rats
bos), Wy See! 5 cq g Ze ~e
T iS. ‘ 5 . °
(20) Fa
1s || NATIONAL cli . F . a
.
Tuma) 1 i” “ ‘
__ | Tunak Rese ff * ~ 4 |
seen xs ‘ ‘3
FOREST “* ve NENG \ Prihevi
: - aM ihevi
am *¢ Bend _ J . 7 Resenor ME
s ae
% ate is . asa | e
f 2) 2
os 1 FJ a 5
3 qk ‘I
UI a Road
a ‘ te Beara
s
Cascade | -——Lakes__ |S . ‘
. a
—
i“ :
.
.
s
+
19
s
i ¥ Jk (Count
Milica Crook (County)
VA . cy chutes County}
ti . ‘
S 20)
s ha ~ & % S, BR he
; .
iS |
+
21
s
Lake
wy
tT La Pine
2 Cy,
s
M3 Deschutes County |_
a 7 jamath County
T
23
$
1)
+
24
s U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
PRINEVILLE DISTRICT
2005
Legend

Administered Lands
Ly Bureau of Land Management

[| National Forest
LS National Grassland
[| Bureau of Reclamation
A State of Oregon

[| Private / Other

Regional Utility Corridor
Planning Area

[| Urban Growth Boundary

Transportation *
=== Collectors

=) Proposed Transportation Corridor
(See Inset Map)

Road

* Note: See RMP maps 12-24 for interim road system

RMP Map 2: Transportation and Utilities

Prineville
District

OREGON

Upper Deschutes
Resource Management Plan

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use

with other data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product

was developed through digital means and may be updated without notification
'MO5-04-02:W-082605
Additional sUAS that Oceanfront Jobs, Ltd. requests be authorized to fly for Exemption Pursuant 

to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act. List below incorporates and replaces list on page 2, 

fourth paragraph of 333 Exemption Request. Please incorporate this document into the full 333 

Exemption.

1. 3D Robotics Aero-M

2. 3D Robotics Iris

3. 3D Robotics Iris+

4. 3D Robotics X8

5. 3DRobotics Fixed Wing

6. 3DRobotics Multirotor

7. 3DRobotics Quadrotor

8. 3DR Solo

9. 3DR Spektre

10. 3DRobotics Spektre Industrial Multi-Rotor Aerial Vehicle

11. 3D Robotics Solo

12. 3DRobotics X8+

13. 3D Robotics X8-M

14. 3D Robotics Y6

15. Aerial Mob Heavy Lifter

16. Aerial Mob Light Lifter

17. Aerigon

18. Aerobo

19. AeroCine Kopterworx Hammer X12

20. Aeromao AeroMapper 300

21. AirRobot AR 180

22. AirRobot AR 100

23. AirRobot AR200

24. Altavian Nova

25. Altavian Nova F6500

26. Altavian Nova R8400

27. Altus X-4

28. Altus X-8

29. CinesStar

30. CinesStar 6

31. CinesStar 6 MK

32. CinesStar X8

33. CinesStar 8

34. CinesStar 8 MK

35. CinesStar 8 HL

36. CinesStar 8 Okto XL

37. DJI Flame Wheel F450

38. DJI Flame Wheel F550

39. DJI Inspire

40. DJI Inspire 1

41. DJI Inspire 2
42. DJI M P330z

43. DJI Phantom

44. DJI Phantom 1

45. DJI Phantom 2

46. DJI Phantom 2+

47. DJI Phantom 2 Vision

48. DJI Phantom 2 Vision+

49. DJI Phantom Vision +

50. DJI Phantom 3 Standard

51. DJI Phantom 3 Advanced

52. DJI Phantom 3 4k

53. DJI Phantom 3 Professional

54. DJI Phantom FC40

55. DJI Spreading Wings S900

56. DJI Spreading Wings S1000

57. DJI Spreading Wings S1000+

58. DJI S800

59. DJI S800 EVO

60. DJI T600

61. FreeFly Systems ALTA RTF

62. FreeFly Systems Octocopter Airframe (Legacy)

63. Hobbyking “Bixler” Fixed Wing Trainer

64. Horizon Hobby Blade 350 Qx2 quadcopter

65. Hubsan X4 micro drone

66. Hubsan H3015S Spy Hawk

67. Parrot Bebop drone

68. Parrot PF 725100 Bebop Drone 14MP

69. Parrot Skycontroller

70. Pixhawk

71. Precision Drone Pacesetter

72. PrecisionHawk

73. PrecisionHawk Hawkeye Mk-III

74. PrecisionHawk Lancaster

75. Precision Lancaster MK3

76. SteadiDrone

77. SteadiDrone Quad

78. SteadiDrone Mavik

79. Tarot Hexacopter

80. Tarot quadcopter

81. Tarot 680pro

82. Tarot 690

83. Tarot 900

84. Tarot 960

85. Tarot T-15

86. Tarot T15 C/F Folding Octocopter

87. Tarot T18 UAV
88. Tarot T690

89. Tarot T810

90. Tarot T960

91. Walkera TALI H500

92. Walkera Scout X4

93. Wookong DJI 5800

94. Yuneec Typhoon

95. Yuneec Tornado

96.

97. Yuneec Typhoon H Hexacopter

98.
###### Editorial Note on Part 11

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

#### § 11.19 What is a special condition?

A special condition is a regulation that applies to a particular aircraft design. The FAA issues special conditions when we find that the airworthiness regulations for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller design do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, because of a novel or unusual design feature.
----

**EXHIBIT          13.2**

**CERTIFICATION          **

**PURSUANT          TO          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS          ENACTED          PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION          906          OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | a) | the                    Report                    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                    or 15(d) of the                    U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | the                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                    the                    Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                    September 16, 2005 |   | [signed]                    Jo Mark Zurel                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |   | Jo Mark                    Zurel                                                     |
|                                             |   | Senior                    Vice-President & Chief Financial                    Officer |

----
EXHIBIT D 

Summary of Marchand ICS Group Hours Worked and Fees Incurred 

Name of Professional Title Hourly Billing 

Rate 

Total Billed 

Hours 

Total Compensation 

Jorge Marchand Principal $175.00 72.70 $12,722.50

Male Noguera Media Manager $95.00 10.90 1,035.00

María Schell Business Editor $110.00 113.70 $12,507.00

Total 197.30 $26,265.00

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22946-4 Filed:11/30/22 Entered:11/30/22 16:44:02 Desc:

Exhibit D Page 1 of 1
From:                                         Schaeffer, John

Sent:                                           Friday, November 15, 2013 11:53 AM 

To:                                               Diane M Pietrzyk 

Cc:                                               Lewis, Paul; Mattheisen, Mike; Njo, Heather 

Subject:                                     70693-50-4 HPV 3 Response to questions regarding testing 

 

Diane, 

 

We will be mailing to you early next week a letter in response to your letter to EPA dated October 21, 2013. 

 

In response to your earlier questions regarding testing requirements for Phenol, 2,4-bis(1-methyl-1-

phenylethyl)-6-[2-(2-nitrophenyl)diazenyl]- (CASRN 70693-50-4), I can let you know the following: 

 

1) The HPV screening level base set would not differ with the different scenarios that you presented, 

 

2) EPA would be willing to consider modeling or surrogate chemical test date in lieu of testing on the 

CASRN 70693-50-4 substance, however, the data submitted would need to be evaluated for adequacy 

and acceptability for that purpose. 

 

Please let me know if you have any additional questions. 

 

Best regards, 

 

John 

 

John Schaeffer 

Senior Biologist 

USEPA/OPPT/CCD/CITB 

1201 Constitution Ave, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Mail Code: 7405M 

Phone: 202-564-8173

Page 1 of 1

file://G:\HPV Test Rules Orphans\Records for FDMS\70693-50-4 HPV 3 Response to que... 1/13/2014
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3379 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3379

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3210 East 10th Street in Bloomington, Indiana, as the ``Francis X. 
                   McCloskey Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3379

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3210 East 10th Street in Bloomington, Indiana, as the ``Francis X. 
                   McCloskey Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3210 
East 10th Street in Bloomington, Indiana, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Francis X. McCloskey Post Office Building'' .

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Francis X. McCloskey Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 5, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
CASIES Report

Sanitized
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF OFFICERS****OF THE FASHION HOUSE HOLDINGS, INC.****PURSUANT TO 18 USC Section 1350**I, John Hanna, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (a) The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 of The FashionHouse Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (b) Information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     *Dated:November 17, 2006* */s/ John Hanna*    *By: John Hanna,*    *Chief Executive Officer*  I, Michael McHugh, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (c) The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 of The FashionHouse Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (d) Information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     *Dated:November 17, 2006 */s/ Michael McHugh*    *By: Michael McHugh*    *Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer*  *
#### BETTS *v.*MOUSER.

Agister of cattle — trover—former recovery — evidence—change of property.

An agister of cattle may have trover against one converting them while in his possession.

The owner may also have an action for their conversion.

The judgment in the first is evidence for the defendant, under the general issue, in the second.

But it may be shown that the judgment was not on the merits, or was only for the injury to the qualified property, and thus its prima facie effect be done away.

A verdict by the owner of a chattel, or by his authority, against a tort feasor, for the value of it, vests the property in the chattel in the defendant.

Error. A. B. was a pasturer for hire, and pastured cattle for Betts and Mouser at the same time. Betts took away his cattle *745first, and Mouser alleging that he also drove away three of'his cattle, brought trover against him for them before a justice of the peace, in the name of A. B. On trial, Betts obtained a judgment for costs. Mouser then brought another action of trover in *his own*name, against Betts. Upon the trial of the issue of not guilty, Betts offered to prove the former suit and recovery in defence, and that it was brought by Mouser. The Court of Common Pleas ruled out the evidence. To reverse the judgment, because that evidence should have been admitted, this suit is brought.

Douglas, .for the plaintiff in error.

Bond, contra.

By the Court.

An agister of cattle has such an. interest in -the cattle he keeps as to enable him to maintain trover against any one taking them away without right, and recover their value, or, for the injury he has sustained. If he has sued by authority and has recovered the value, the recovery is *conclusive*of the subject. If the agister sue and recover the value, he elects to hold himself answerable to the owner. If the owner sanction the suit, he cannot afterwards question the right. If we are right in this, the only question for us to decide on the record is, whether .a former *trial*and judgment upon the same .subject may be given in evidence under the general issue in trover. A recovery of damages in trespass or trover, changes the property of the chattel converted: (2 *Sir. li.*1078; 4 *Esp. C.*251; 3 *Camp. R.*317; 1 *Bing. R.*371". If, then, the right to sue, and the recovery of damages changes the property, the determination of the right of the defendant, may be equally conclusive, if with a person having the right, and if decided on the merits. The defendant, under not guilty in trover, may give in evidence any thin'g which shows the plaintiff had no property, or a former recovery: (3 *WUs. R.*308; *Blk. R.*831: 1 *Pick. R.*65.) The judgment merges the original cause of action, while it remains in force. The evidence tended to make out the defence and should have been admitted. Iiow far the judgment was conclusive is a different question; if the decision was not upon the question of right, that might be shown by rebutting evidence, as it would have been by replication, if it had been specially pleaded. Judgment reversed.



case was argued and submitted in Ross county, but the' opinion was pronounced in Pickaway.