alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2/22/2014 Premium Efficiency - U.S. MOTORS

http://www.usmotors.com/Energy-Efficiency/Premium-Efficient-Motors.aspx 1/1

HOME / ENERGY EFFICIENCY / PREMIUM EFFICIENCY

Visit our other brand w ebsites

© 2013 Nidec Motor Corporation. All rights reserved.

A Nidec Group Company.

Nidec Motor Corporation trademarks follow ed by the ® symbol are registered w ith the U.S.

Patent and Trademark Office.

Home Terms of Use Sitemap Contact Us RSS

ENERGY EFFICIENCY

ENERGY EFFICIENCY

CALCULATORS

EISA LEGISLATION

PREMIUM EFFICIENCY

Premium Efficiency

Nidec Motor Corporation offers an extensive line of U.S. MOTORS® brand industrial and commercial high efficiency electric motors that

meet or exceed NEMA Premium®† standards. These motors are an integral component in reducing overall energy use.

Nidec Motor Corporation carries a complete line of Premium Efficient products

U.S. MOTORS® Branded Premium Efficient motor products include:

Open Dripproof

HOSTILE DUTYTM TEFC

Hazardous Location

841 PLUS®

HOLLOSHAFT® Verticals

Cooling Tower Duty

Extreme-E® Pool Pump motors

2EZ Speed® Pool Motors

RESCUE EcoTech® HVAC Blower Motors

UNIMOUNT® TEFC

CORRO-DUTY® TEFC

Washdown

TITAN® Horizontal and Vertical Motors

Automotive Duty U-Frames

Close Coupled Pump

ECOTECH EZ® Pool Pump motor

PEP High Efficiency HVAC Blower Motors

We meet the Standards

All high performance integral horsepower (IHP) motors carry a nameplate including both 50 and 60 Hz operating data, a NEMA

Premium®† trademark and European IE efficiency marks, providing a clear means for both users and OEM’s to verify global regulatory

compliance.

The NEMA Premium®† line also complies with recent Canadian and Mexican standards.

What does this mean for your business?

Nidec Motor Corporation maintains a broad spectrum of U.S. MOTORS premium efficient products to support your business needs.

From motors designed for commercial and residential heating, air conditioning, and pool and spa applications to motors supporting

large industrial processes, our products exceed industry and government efficiency standards making it possible for you to reduce your

energy use.

Related Information

Premium Efficient Motors Product Data Sheet

NEMA Premium®† Motors Product Data Sheet

† All non-Nidec Motor Corporation marks shown within thisdocument are propertiesof their respective owners.

MotorBoss Contact Us About Nidec Motor Corporation Select Language

Find a Distributor Online Catalog/Cross Reference Chat Support

OUR PRODUCTS INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS SERVICE & SUPPORT ENERGY EFFICIENCY ABOUT US SEARCH
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         I, Eric Bello, Treasurer (principal financial officer) of Quipp, Inc.,
a Florida corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my
knowledge:

         (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      * * *




/s/ Eric Bello
-----------------
Eric Bello
Treasurer (principal financial officer)

Date:    November 13, 2003
§ 362.7 Definitions. For the purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply: ( a ) *Affiliate* has the same meaning contained in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).
( b ) *Activity, company, control, equity security, insured state nonmember bank, security and subsidiary* have the same meaning as provided in subpart A of this part.
[63 FR 66326, Dec. 1, 1998, as amended at 66 FR 1028, Jan. 5, 2001]
Hearing Date: February 2-3, 2022, at 9:30 (EST)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO, 

As representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al.

Debtors1

.

PROMESA

Title III

Re: ECF No. 19859

Case No. 17-03283

(Joint Administration Requested)

UNITED STATES TRUSTEE’S INFORMATIVE MOTION

REGARDING ATTENDANCE AT FEBRUARY 2-3, 2022, HEARING

Mary Ida Townson, the United States Trustee for Region 21, through undersigned counsel, 

hereby states and prays as follows:

Mary Ida Towson, the United States Trustee for Region 21, will attend the omnibus hearing 

in these cases to be held by the Court on February 2-3, 2022. The United States Trustee will be 

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective bankruptcy case number 

and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are 

the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits 

of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico 

Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); and (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government 

of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3566-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686). Case Nos. 17 BK 3283-LTS and 17 BK 3284-LTS are 

jointly administered by order of the court.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19959 Filed:01/31/22 Entered:01/31/22 15:27:24 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Hearing Date: February 2-3, 2022, at 9:30 (EST)

represented at the hearing by Nan R. Eitel, Associate General Counsel from the Executive Office 

for U.S. Trustees, and Monsita Lecároz-Arribas, Assistant United States Trustee for the District of 

Puerto Rico, regarding the

JOINT INFORMATIVE MOTION OF FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT 

BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, FEE EXAMINER, AND U.S. TRUSTEE IN COMPLIANCE 

WITH COURT ORDER REGARDING ENACTMENT OF THE PUERTO RICO 

RECOVERY ACCURACY IN DISCLOSURES ACT (ECF No. 19859)

Ms. Eitel and Ms. Lecároz-Arribas will appear via videoconference technology.

WHEREFORE, the United States Trustee requests that the Court take note of the United 

States Trustee’s appearance at the February 2-3, 2022, omnibus hearing. 

DATED: February 1, 2022

MARY IDA TOWNSON

United States Trustee for Region 21

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE

Edificio Ochoa

500 Tanca Street, Suite 301

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901-1922

Tel.: (787) 729-7444

Fax: (787) 729-7449

(Electronically Filed)

By: s/ Monsita Lecaroz-Arribas

Monsita Lecaroz-Arribas

Assistant U.S. Trustee

USDC-PR No. 207707

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19959 Filed:01/31/22 Entered:01/31/22 15:27:24 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2998 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2998

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide permanent authority 
for the exemption for certain members of the uniformed services from an 
otherwise-applicable requirement for the payment of subsistence charges 
                          while hospitalized.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2998

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide permanent authority 
for the exemption for certain members of the uniformed services from an 
otherwise-applicable requirement for the payment of subsistence charges 
                          while hospitalized.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE 
              UNIFORMED SERVICES FROM REQUIREMENT TO PAY SUBSISTENCE 
              CHARGES WHILE HOSPITALIZED.

    Subsection (c) of section 1075 of title 10, United States Code (as 
added by section 8146(a)(2) of the Department of Defense Appropriations 
Act, 2004 (Public Law 108-87)), is repealed.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 8, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### BROWNELL *v.*SKINNER.

Writ of error — waver—jurisdiction—captious objection,

Without a writ of error issued and returned, the court of error lias no jurisdiction ¡ the parties may appear and wave citation, but not the writ.

If a parly obtain a continuance of a complaint under die forcible detainer law, it is captious for him to object to the jury on (bat account, or to require a new complaint.

Error to the Common Pleas. Skinner complained before two justices under the forcible detainer law, and obtained a venire, returnable *683the 14th of Sept. 1833. The parties appeared at the time, and Brownell obtained a continuance of the cause till the 4th of October, on account of the absence of a witness. At which timo tlíé parties and jurors appeared, and Brownell obtained a further continuance till the 26th of October. On that day the parties and jurors appeared for trial, and Brownell objected to the jury, and Skinner, without waiting for the decision of the justices, took a new venire on which the same jurors were summoned and answered. Brownell, then objected'that a second venire could not issue, and as the first jury was discharged, no further proceeding could be had except a new complaint were made. The objection was overruled and the jury sworn. After the plaintiff rested her case, the court allowed her to call a witness to prove notice to the defendant to quit, and then charged the jury to return such a verdict as they should think proper. There was no bill of exceptions — these facts were certified by the justibes. The judgment, which was for the plaintiff, was afterwards removed into the Common Pleas by certiorari, and affirmed. To reverse this affirming judgment this writ is brought, and the general errors are assigned. A writ of error had been allowed, but none had issued.

By the Court.

This eause may be struck from the docket. Without a writ of error and a return we have no authority to act in the case. The parties may wave the citation but not the writ of error. We do not regret this, for the plaintiff’s objections are too captious to entitle him to favor.
###### Editorial Note on Part 747

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 747 appear at 84 FR 1609, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 747.608 Documentation of fees and expenses.

The application shall be accompanied by full documentation of the fees and expenses, including the cost of any study, analysis, audit, test, project or similar matter, for which an award is sought. A separate itemized statement shall be submitted for each professional firm or individual whose services are covered by the application, showing hours spent in connection with the proceeding by each individual, a description of the specific services performed, the rate at which each fee has been computed, any expenses for which reimbursement is sought, the total amount claimed, and the total amount paid or payable by the applicant or by any other person or entity for the services provided. The administrative law judge or the NCUA Board may require the applicant to provide vouchers, receipts, or other substantiation for any expenses claimed.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-18-00035-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 342nd District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 342-262692-12

Before Bassel, Kerr, and Pittman, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

HARRIETT NICHOLSON, Appellant

V.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS 

TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF CWMBS, INC., CWMBS

REFORMING LOAN REMIC TRUST CERTIFICATES SERIES 2005-R2,

MELANIE COWAN, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AND RECONTRUST 

COMPANY, N.A., Appellees
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Harriett Nicholson attempts to appeal an October 26, 2017 order 

labeled “Final Judgment.” On January 10, 2019, we notified Nicholson of our 

concern that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order does not appear 

to be a final judgment that disposes of all parties. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 

S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001) (explaining that a judgment is final for purposes of 

appeal if it (1) actually disposes of all claims and parties or (2) states with unmistakable 

clarity that it is a final judgment). We informed Nicholson that her appeal could be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless she or any party desiring to continue the 

appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.3(a), 44.3. In response, Nicholson filed an unopposed amended motion to abate 

the appeal, claiming that the October 26, 2017 order is final but that it is erroneous 

and seeking to have the appeal abated “until the remaining claims, parties, and issues 

are resolved in the trial court.” Because the response does not show grounds for 

continuing the appeal, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.1 See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 200.

Per Curiam

Delivered: January 31, 2019

 1

Because we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, we take no action on 

Nicholson’s “Unopposed Amended Motion To Abate Appeal.” See Elliott v. Deutsche 

Bank Nat’l Trust Co., No. 02-16-00421-CV, 2017 WL 526315, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.—

Fort Worth Feb. 9, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“Because we lack jurisdiction over this 

appeal, we take no action on Appellants’ ‘Motion for Stay of Action on Appeal.’”).
EXHIBIT 1

Form of Discovery Notice

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23661-1 Filed:03/01/23 Entered:03/01/23 17:05:22 Desc:

Exhibit 1 - Form of Discovery Notice Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et 

al., 

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17-BK-3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY,

Debtor. 

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17-BK-4780-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

NOTICE OF INTENT TO PARTICIPATE IN DISCOVERY 

FOR CONFIRMATION OF PREPA PLAN OF ADJUSTMENT

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “Commonwealth”) (Bankruptcy 

Case No. 17-BK-3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico 

Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3284-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation 

Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3566-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747); and 

(vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK-5523-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case numbers are listed as 

Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23661-1 Filed:03/01/23 Entered:03/01/23 17:05:22 Desc:

Exhibit 1 - Form of Discovery Notice Page 2 of 3
___________________ (“Participant”) hereby submits this notice of intent to participate 

in discovery for confirmation of the Title III Plan of Adjustment of the Puerto Rico Electric 

Power Authority [ECF No. _____], as may be amended, modified, or supplemented, pursuant to 

the Court’s Order Establishing Procedures and Deadlines Concerning Objections to 

Confirmation and Discovery in Connection Therewith [ECF No. _______] and respectfully states 

as follows: 

1. Participant’s contact information, including email address, and that of its counsel:

Participant’s Name

Participant’s Address

Names and Addresses of Counsel:

Email Addresses of Counsel:

2. Participant’s Claim number and the nature of Participant’s Claim:

Claim Number:

Nature of Claim:

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: ___________________ 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23661-1 Filed:03/01/23 Entered:03/01/23 17:05:22 Desc:

Exhibit 1 - Form of Discovery Notice Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chell Group  Corporation
(the  "Company")  for the  period  ending  November  30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
Bolink, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S) 1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to (S) 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                              By: /s/ David Bolink
                                  ---------------------------------
                                  DAVID BOLINK
                                  CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

November 30, 2004

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Chell Group  Corporation  and will
be retained by Chell Group  Corporation  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                      -24-
**     DCI Home:				Heart & Vascular Diseases:				Holes in the Heart: What Are ...       What Are ...How the Heart WorksTypesCausesSigns & SymptomsDiagnosisTreatmentsLiving With Key PointsLinks  What Are Holes in the Heart? 
A hole in the heart (also called an atrial septal								  defect (ASD) or ventricular septal defect (VSD)) is a type of simple								  congenital								  (kon-JEN-i-tal) heart defect. This is a problem with the heart's structure								  that's present at birth.								  Congenital								  heart defects change the normal flow of blood through the heart.

Your heart has two sides, separated by an inner wall								  called the septum. With each heartbeat, the right side of the heart receives								  oxygen-poor blood from the body and pumps it to the lungs. The left side of the								  heart receives oxygen-rich blood from the lungs and pumps it to the body. The								  septum prevents mixing of blood between the two sides of the heart. 

Some babies are born with a hole in the upper or								  lower septum. A hole in the septum between the heart's upper two chambers (the								  atria, pronounced AY-tree-uh) is an ASD. A hole in the septum between the								  heart's lower two chambers (the ventricles, pronounced VEN-trih-kuls) is a VSD.								  

A hole in the septum can allow blood to pass from								  the left side of the heart to the right side. This means that oxygen-rich blood								  can mix with oxygen-poor blood, causing the oxygen-rich blood to be pumped to								  the lungs a second time. 

Over the past few decades, the diagnosis and								  treatment of ASDs and VSDs have greatly improved. As a result, a child with a								  simple heart defect can grow to adulthood and live a normal, active, and								  productive life because his or her heart defect closes on its own or has been								  repaired. 

December 2007
How the Heart				  Works Print all Sections of this TopicBlood Diseases |								Heart and Blood Vessel Diseases |								Lung Diseases |								Sleep DisordersNHLBI Privacy								Statement | NHLBI								Accessibility PolicyNIH Home |								NHLBI Home | DCI Home | About								DCI | SearchAbout NHLBI |								Contact NHLBINote to users of screen								readers and other assistive technologies: please report your problems here.**
§ 614.4100 Policies governing lending through Federal land bank associations. ( a ) Farm Credit Banks and agricultural credit banks may delegate authority to make credit decisions to Federal land bank associations that demonstrate the ability to extend and administer credit soundly, provided the association develops, implements and maintains adequate credit administration guidelines, standards, and practices.
( b ) The board of directors of each Farm Credit Bank and each agricultural credit bank lending through Federal land bank associations shall adopt policies and procedures governing the exercise of statutory and delegated authorities by such associations. Policies governing the delegated authorities shall: ( 1 ) Define authorities to be delegated;
( 2 ) Require the documented evaluation of the capability and responsibility of individuals exercising delegated authorities;
( 3 ) Provide for reporting of actions taken under delegated authority to the delegating bank;
( 4 ) Provide procedures for periodic review and enforcement;
( 5 ) Provide for withdrawal of authority where appropriate; and
( 6 ) Where redelegation from the association's board to association employees is authorized, require similar control measures to be used.
[55 FR 24883, June 19, 1990]
#### William L. Brown, Respondent, *v.*Ludwig Hess, Appellant.

Appeal by the tenant from a final order made by the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, awarding to the landlord the possession of certain premises for nonpayment of rent.

William S. Katzenstein, for appellant.

William Steele Grey, for respondent.

*751
      *Per Curiam.*

These proceedings were brought to recover possession of certain premises situate in the borough of Manhattan, by reason of the nonpayment of seven months’ rent, viz., February, March, April, May, June, July and August of the year 1900, at $208.33 1/3 per month, making in all the sum of $1,456.33.

The evidence for the landlord shows that the sum stated was due when the proceedings were brought; that the rent became due on the first day of each month; that there was demanded of the tenant payment of the rent for each of the months above specified, and that he failed to pay.

Although a general denial only was put in, the tenant testified that on the day previous to the trial he mailed a check to the landlord. The amount of such check was not stated, nor the place to which it is claimed the same was mailed. Inasmuch as the landlord denied having received the check and since the tenant did not testify to any other payment, the justice was justified in finding, as he did, that the tenant was indebted to the landlord in the entire sum claimed to be due.

There being no other ground of asserted error apparent in the record, the final order must be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Beekmah, P. J., Giegeeich and O’Gormah, JJ.

Final order affirmed, with costs.