alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of TurboSonicTechnologies Inc., (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, (the "Report"), I,Edward F. Spink, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that: 

(1)   

The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)   

The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company. 

|   | /s/ EDWARD F. SPINK               |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   | Edward F. Spink                   |
|   | Chief Executive    Officer        |
|   | (Principal Executive    Officer ) |
|   | September 21, 2007                |

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of TurboSonicTechnologies Inc., (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, (the "Report"), I,Carl A. Young, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that: 

(1)   

The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)   

The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company. 

|   | /s/ CARL A. YOUNG                |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   | Carl A. Young                    |
|   | Chief Financial    Officer       |
|   | (Principal Financial    Officer) |
|   | September 21, 2007               |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 11

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 11 appear at 61 FR 18052, April 24, 1996.

#### § 11.15 What is a petition for exemption?

A petition for exemption is a request to the FAA by an individual or entity asking for relief from the requirements of a current regulation. For petitions for waiver of commercial space transportation regulations, see part 404 of this title.

[FAA-2016-6761, Amdt. No. 11-62, 83 FR 28534, June 20, 2016]
Order entered March 30 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 19 - 01476 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF C .T.H. AND H.V.H., CH ILDREN On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 14 - 07021

ORDER Before the Court is appellee’s March 24, 2020 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file her brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to April 13, 2020

. /s/ BI LL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
# Europeiska unionens C 463I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 463I |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 64 årgången16 november 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 463I

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

64 årgången16 november 2021

---

| Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Upplysningar |
| | UPPLYSNINGAR FRÅN EUROPEISKA UNIONENS INSTITUTIONER, BYRÅER OCH ORGAN |
| | Europeiska kommissionen |
| 2021/C 463 I/01 | Utnämning av ett förhörsombud i vissa konkurrensförfaranden | 1 |

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

IV   Upplysningar

UPPLYSNINGAR FRÅN EUROPEISKA UNIONENS INSTITUTIONER, BYRÅER OCH ORGAN

Europeiska kommissionen

2021/C 463 I/01

Utnämning av ett förhörsombud i vissa konkurrensförfaranden

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

IV Upplysningar

UPPLYSNINGAR FRÅN EUROPEISKA UNIONENS INSTITUTIONER, BYRÅER OCH ORGAN

Europeiska kommissionen

| 16.11.2021 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CI 463/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2021

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CI 463/1

---

Utnämning av ett förhörsombud i vissa konkurrensförfaranden

(2021/C 463 I/01)

Efter förflyttningen av Wouter WILS har kommissionen utnämnt Eric GIPPINI FOURNIER till förhörsombud med verkan från och med den 1 december 2021, i enlighet med beslut av Europeiska kommissionens ordförande av den 13 oktober 2011 om förhörsombudets funktion och kompetensområde i vissa konkurrensförfaranden (EUT L 275, 20.10.2011, s. 29).

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ALTON D. BROWN,

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 17 MAP 2018

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court dated January

17, 2018 at No. 3 M.D. 2017

O RDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: May 31, 2019

AND NOW, this 31 st day of May , 2019

, Appellant’s “Application For Leave To

Proceed In Forma Pauperis ” and “Application for Special Relief” are D ENIED and the

Order of the Commonwealth Court is A FFIRMED

.
Exhibit 31.2
                          CERTIFICATION

I, James Ivchenko, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Epolin, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue  statements of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact  necessary  to make the statements made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under  which  such  statements  were   made,   not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,  and
other  financial  information included  in  this  report,  fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of  operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,  and  for,
the periods presented in this report;

      4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls  and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act  Rules  13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

           (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us  by  others  within  those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report  is
being prepared;

           (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report  our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls  and procedures, as of the end of the period covered  by
this report based on such evaluation; and

           (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting  that
occurred  during the small business issuer's most  recent  fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely  to
materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal  control
over financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and  I  have  disclosed, based on our most recent  evaluation  of
internal  control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a)    All   significant  deficiencies  and  material
weaknesses  in the design or operation of internal  control  over
financial  reporting  which are reasonable  likely  to  adversely
affect  the  small business issuer's ability to record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

           (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in  the
small   business   issuer's  internal  control   over   financial
reporting.


Dated: July 5, 2005          By: /s/ James Ivchenko
                                 James Ivchenko,
                                 President (Principal Financial
                                 Officer)
§ 105.13 Radio equipment and use requirements. ( a ) Except when otherwise authorized by air traffic control— ( 1 ) No person may conduct a parachute operation, and no pilot in command of an aircraft may allow a parachute operation to be conducted from that aircraft, in or into controlled airspace unless, during that flight— ( i ) The aircraft is equipped with a functioning two-way radio communication system appropriate to the air traffic control facilities being used; and
( ii ) Radio communications have been established between the aircraft and the air traffic control facility having jurisdiction over the affected airspace of the first intended exit altitude at least 5 minutes before the parachute operation begins. The pilot in command must establish radio communications to receive information regarding air traffic activity in the vicinity of the parachute operation.
( 2 ) The pilot in command of an aircraft used for any parachute operation in or into controlled airspace must, during each flight— ( i ) Continuously monitor the appropriate frequency of the aircraft's radio communications system from the time radio communications are first established between the aircraft and air traffic control, until the pilot advises air traffic control that the parachute operation has ended for that flight.
( ii ) Advise air traffic control when the last parachutist or object leaves the aircraft.
( b ) Parachute operations must be aborted if, prior to receipt of a required air traffic control authorization, or during any parachute operation in or into controlled airspace, the required radio communications system is or becomes inoperative.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7224

STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen,

Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00322-GCM)

Submitted: October 1, 2010 Decided: October 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stuart Wayne Tompkins, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, 

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stuart Wayne Tompkins appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Tompkins v. Mitchell, No. 1:08-cv-00322-GCM (W.D.N.C. 

Apr. 14, 2009). Tompkins’ motions for default judgment, for a 

temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, and for 

appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 325.6 Required reports of stress test results to the FDIC and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. ( a ) *Report required for periodic stress test results.* A covered bank must report to the FDIC and to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, on or before April 5 of the reporting year, the results of the stress test in the manner and form specified by the FDIC.
( b ) *Content of reports.* ( 1 ) The reports required under paragraph (a) of this section must include under the baseline scenario, severely adverse scenario, and any other scenario required by the Corporation under this part, a description of the types of risks being included in the stress test, a summary description of the methodologies used in the stress test, and, for each quarter of the planning horizon, estimates of aggregate losses, pre-provision net revenue, provision for loan and lease losses, net income, and pro forma capital ratios (including regulatory and any other capital ratios specified by the FDIC). In addition, the report must include an explanation of the most significant causes for the changes in regulatory capital ratios and any other information required by the Corporation.
( 2 ) The description of aggregate losses and net income must include the cumulative losses and cumulative net income over the planning horizon, and the description of each regulatory capital ratio must include the beginning value, ending value, and minimum value of each ratio over the planning horizon.
( c ) *Confidential treatment of information submitted.* The confidentiality of information submitted to the Corporation under this part and related materials will be determined in accordance with applicable law including any available exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)) and the FDIC's Rules and Regulations regarding the Disclosure of Information (12 CFR part 309).
[84 FR 56934, Oct. 24, 2019]
# Jurnalul Oficial C 464A/17 n

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 464A |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 6417 noiembrie 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 464A

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 6417 noiembrie 2021

---

| Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | Rectificări |
| 2021/C 464 A/01 | Rectificare la Direcția Generală Cercetare și Inovare – Publicarea unui anunț de post vacant pentru funcția de consilier principal – Președintele comitetului Consiliului European pentru Inovare (Agent temporar – gradul AD 14) – COM/2021/10408 ( JO C 432 A, 26.10.2021 ) | 1 |

Cuprins

Pagina

Rectificări

2021/C 464 A/01

Rectificare la Direcția Generală Cercetare și Inovare – Publicarea unui anunț de post vacant pentru funcția de consilier principal – Președintele comitetului Consiliului European pentru Inovare (Agent temporar – gradul AD 14) – COM/2021/10408 ( JO C 432 A, 26.10.2021 )

( JO C 432 A, 26.10.2021 )

1

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

Rectificări

| 17.11.2021 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | CA 464/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2021

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

CA 464/1

---

Rectificare la Direcția Generală Cercetare și Inovare – Publicarea unui anunț de post vacant pentru funcția de consilier principal – Președintele comitetului Consiliului European pentru Inovare

(Agent temporar – gradul AD 14)

COM/2021/10408

(
  Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene C 432 A din 26 octombrie 2021
  )

(2021/C 464 A/01)

La pagina 5, la rubrica „Data-limită”, primul paragraf:

| în loc de: | „Data-limită pentru înscriere este 26 noiembrie 2021, ora 12.00 (amiază), ora Bruxelles-ului. Înscrierea nu va mai fi posibilă ulterior.”, |
| --- | --- |

în loc de:

„Data-limită pentru înscriere este 26 noiembrie 2021, ora 12.00 (amiază), ora Bruxelles-ului. Înscrierea nu va mai fi posibilă ulterior.”,

| se citește: | „Data-limită pentru înscriere este 17 decembrie 2021, ora 12.00 (amiază), ora Bruxelles-ului. Înscrierea nu va mai fi posibilă ulterior.” |
| --- | --- |

se citește:

se citește:

„Data-limită pentru înscriere este 17 decembrie 2021, ora 12.00 (amiază), ora Bruxelles-ului. Înscrierea nu va mai fi posibilă ulterior.”

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3487

To establish an alternative trigger for determining if an extended benefit 

period is in effect for a State for purposes of certain benefits under 

the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2003

Mr. WALDEN of Oregon (for himself, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon, 

Mr. WU, Mr. BLUMENAUER, and Ms. DUNN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To establish an alternative trigger for determining if an 

extended benefit period is in effect for a State for purposes of certain benefits under the Temporary Extended 

Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ALTERNATIVE TRIGGER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 203(c)(2) of the Tem5 porary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 

6 2002 (26 U.S.C. 3304 note) is amended—

7 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

8 the end; 
2

•HR 3487 IH 

1 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period 

2 and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(C) such a period would then be in effect 

5 for such State under such Act if—

6 ‘‘(i) the State law of such State pro7 vided for the alternative trigger described 

8 in section 203(f) of such Act, applied in 

9 accordance with clause (ii); and 

10 ‘‘(ii) such section 203(f) were applied 

11 by disregarding clause (ii) of paragraph 

12 (1)(A) thereof and any reference to such 

13 clause.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply in determining whether an 

17 extended benefit period is in effect for a State for 

18 purposes of determining eligibility for TEUC Second 

19 Tier benefits based on an exhaustion of TEUC First 

20 Tier benefits occurring on or after the date of the 

21 enactment of this Act. 

22 (2) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub23 section—

24 (A) the term ‘‘TEUC First Tier benefits’’ 

25 means any benefits, other than TEUC Second 
3

•HR 3487 IH 

1 Tier benefits, payable to an individual under 

2 the Temporary Extended Unemployment Com3 pensation Act of 2002; and 

4 (B) the term ‘‘TEUC Second Tier bene5 fits’’ means benefits payable to an individual 

6 under the Temporary Extended Unemployment 

7 Compensation Act of 2002 based on a deter8 mination under section 203(c) thereof.

Æ
## 1996 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

12-9-1996 

# H umphr e ys v

. DE A

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al :

D ock e t 96-3099

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1996

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1996 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" H ump hr eys v

. DE A" (1996). 1996 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 9. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1996/9

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 96-3099

EARL A. HUMPHREYS, M.D., Petitioner

v.

DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Respondent.

On the motion of the Drug Enforcement Administrati on to vacate the September 17, 1996 decision and dismiss the app eal as moot.

Present:Becker, Stapleton, and Michel,* Circui t Judges

ORDER

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of the Drug Enforcement Administration to vacate the Septe mber 17, 1996 decision and to dismiss the appeal as moot. On consideration whereof, and in accordance wit h the panel's written decision it is here ordered and adj udged by this Court that the motion to vacate the September 17, 1 996 panel decision as moot and to dismiss the appeal is denie d. The Drug Enforcement Agency shall have 14 days from the date of this order

*Hon. Paul R. Michel, United States Circuit Judge f or the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

in which to file a petition for rehearing and/or re hearing en

banc.

ATTEST:

### Chief Deputy Clerk

Dated: December 9, 1996
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-2115

DERRICK ALLEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GOVERNOR ROY COOPER; ROY LEE GUY; LAURA DIAN LOEWE; THE 

OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00794-TDS-LPA)

Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: February 22, 2022

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2115 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Derrick Allen appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and dismissing Allen’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Allen v. Cooper, No. 1:19-cv-00794-

TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2115 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.2 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors
MTI Technology Corporation: We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
No. 333-85410 on Form S-3 and the registration statements (Nos. 333-109060,
333-103065, 333-85410, 333-76972, 333-69030, 333-66716, 333-95915, 333-92623,
333-85579, 333-61957, 333-46363, 333-50377, 333-18501, 33-75180 and 33-80438)
on Form S-8 of MTI Technology Corporation of our report dated May 23, 2003,
except as to the second paragraph of note 7, which is as of June 30, 2003,
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of MTI Technology Corporation and
subsidiaries as of April 5, 2003 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
two-year period ended April 5, 2003, and related schedule, which report appears
in Amendment No. 3 to the April 3, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K/A of MTI
Technology Corporation. Our report refers to a change in the method of
accounting for goodwill and intangible assets effective April 8, 2001. /s/ KPMG LLP Costa Mesa, California
December 17, 2004
APPENDICES 

APPENDIX A – Reserved for the Response to Comments on the DSEIS and 

 FSEIS

APPENDIX B -Forest Plan Direction and Proposed Amendments 

APPENDIX C - Terrestrial Wildlife Species Accounts 

APPENDIX D - Watershed and Soil Characteristics 

APPENDIX E - Current Forest Orders 

APPENDIX F – Port-Orford Cedar Risk Analysis 

APPENDIX G – Aquatic and Fisheries Species Accounts 

APPENDIX H – Errata Sheet 
This page is intentionally left blank