alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, George Feldenkreis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Perry Ellis International, Inc. on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Perry Ellis International, Inc.



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|April 18, 2008
|               | 
|By:            |  | /s/ George Feldenkreis 
|Name:          |  | George Feldenkreis     
|Title:         |  | Chief Executive Officer
Order entered May 19, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00146
- CV
SUZANNE HITSELBERGER , Appellant

V. LOUIS BAKOS , Appellee On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 19
- 18280

O RDER The reporter’s record was filed on May 3, 2021. On May 5, 2021, counsel for appellant filed a letter informing the court reporter that the reporter’s re cord is incomplete. On the Court’s own motion , we ORDER Glenda Finkley, Official Court Reporter for the 256th Judicial District Court, to file , by June 2, 2021 , the following: (1) a supplemental reporter’s record containing Petitioner’s and Respondent’s Exhibits admitted during the trial conducted on August 26, 202 0 and(2) the reporter’ s record of the motion for new trial hearing conducted on February

8, 2021. Appellant’s brief will be due thirty days after the above

- listed additional reporter’s records are filed.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Finkley and all parties.
/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10096]



[[Page 21735]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP97-315-000, et al., CP97-319-000, CP98-200-000, and 
CP98-540-000; Docket Nos. ER98-3760-000 et al.]


Independence Pipeline Company, ANR Pipeline Company, National 
Fuel Gas Supply Corporation and Transcontinental Gas Pipeline 
Corporation; California Independent System Operator; Notice

April 18, 2000.
    Take notice that, on the Commission's Docket Sheets and Service 
Lists web page, the link to Restricted Service Lists has been revised 
to include a new service list in the above designated pending dockets.
    The new restricted service lists have been established by the 
Secretary pursuant to Rule 2010(d), 18 CFR 385.2010(d).
    These service lists are available in both PDF and WordPerfect file 
formats. See http://fercdocket.ferc.fed.us/pa/pa.htm

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10096 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00134-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.D.N. AND M.L.N., CHILDREN

From the 77th District Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 09-107-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Appellee has not filed a 

response. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed May 12, 2010

[CV06]
#### § 313.20 Applicability and scope.

The provisions of this subpart apply to the collection of debts owed to the United States arising from transactions with the FDIC. Administrative offset is authorized under the DCIA. This subpart is consistent with the FCCS on administrative offset issued by the Department of Justice.
§ 711.6 General exemption. ( a ) *Exemption.* NCUA may, by agency order issued following receipt of an application, exempt an interlock from the prohibitions in § 711.3, if NCUA finds that the interlock would not result in a monopoly or substantial lessening of competition, and would not present other safety and soundness concerns.
( b ) *Presumptions.* In reviewing applications for an exemption under this section, NCUA will apply a rebuttable presumption that an interlock will not result in a monopoly or substantial lessening of competition if the depository organization seeking to add a management official: ( 1 ) Primarily serves, low- and moderate-income areas;
( 2 ) Is controlled or managed by persons who are members of a minority group or women;
( 3 ) Is a depository institution that has been chartered for less than two years; or
( 4 ) Is deemed to be in “troubled condition” as defined in § 701.14(b)(3) of this chapter.
( c ) *Duration.* Unless a shorter expiration period is provided in the NCUA approval, an exemption permitted by paragraph (a) of this section may continue so long as it would not result in a monopoly or substantial lessening of competition, or be unsafe or unsound. If the NCUA grants an interlock exemption in reliance upon a presumption under paragraph (b) of this section, the interlock may continue for three years, unless otherwise provided in the approval.
[64 FR 66360, Nov. 26, 1999]
#### HARPER *v.*SEELY.

Guardian — administrator of the ward — accounts between them.

Where a guardian of a ward obtains a judgment against a debtor of his ward, and before payment the ward dies and administration is taken out on her estate, upon notice from whom the debtor pays over to the administrator the amount of the judgment, he may come into chancery to enjoin the guardian from collecting the judgment, but he must make the administrators parties.

In Chancery. The bill claims that. Seely, as guardian of Melinda Miller, recovered a judgment against him for two hundred and eight *391dollars and ninety-seven cents. Melinda died in 1830, and administration on her estate was granted to Hubbard and another, who directed the complainant not to pay to Seely. In 1832, the complainant paid the administrators, and took their receipt. The prayer of the bill is for a perpetual injunction against the judgment.

Seely, in his answer, sets up the judgment, and disclaims all knowledge of the discharge. He says Melinda was a lunatic, for whom he made advances, and claims to collect in order to indemnify himself. . .

' The only proof is the guardian’s account, by which it appears that on settlement with the court, there was a balance in Seely’s hands of two hundred and seventy-two dollars.

Wright, J.

The case made is one where the guardian and the administrators of the ward, to a certain extent, represent the same interest. It appears that the guardian, Seely, has a balance in his hands over and above the judgment; this goes to .the administrators, as will also the proceeds of the judgment when collected. It is alleged that the judgment is already paid to the administrators, to whom it belonged; and if collected again, they will have to receive of the guardian, and pay it back again to the complainant. Why collect it again, if this is so? Why make the administrators repay Harper, that he may pay the same money over to Seely, to be by him paid back again to the administrators? This would be child’s play. If the case is made out, the complainant may have relief. But to establish the facts, the administrators, who are mainly interested, should be made parties, and have an opportunity to contest the fact of their having received the money.

Leave is given to the complainant to amend, so as to make the administrators parties. After amendment, the master may take an account of the sums in the hands of the guardian, and the amount, if any, paid by the complainant to the administrators.



The above decretal order was made at Medina, by judges Wright and Wood, to which county the case was taken under advisement.
§ 46.7 Reports to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve Board. ( a ) *Timing.* A covered institution must report to the OCC and to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, on or before April 5 of the reporting year, the results of the stress test in the manner and form specified by the OCC.
( b ) *Confidentiality of Reports.* As provided by § 4.32(b) of this title, the report required under this section is non-public OCC information because it is deemed to be a record created or obtained by the OCC in connection with the OCC's performance of its responsibilities, such as a record concerning supervision, licensing, regulations, and examination, of a national bank, a Federal savings association, a bank holding company, a savings and loan holding company, or an affiliate. The report is the property of the OCC and unauthorized disclosure of the report is generally prohibited pursuant to § 4.37 of this part.
[77 FR 61246, Oct. 9, 2012, as amended at 79 FR 71633, Dec. 3, 2014; 83 FR 7953, Feb. 23, 2018; 84 FR 54476, Oct. 10, 2019]
#### Burkhalter *et al. v.*Peoples Bank.

Per Curiam.

1. “As a general rule, a bank may assume that a trustee will apply money deposited by him to its proper purposes under the trust, and is not accountable for any misappropriation of trust funds in which it does not participate; but a bank can not, without incurring liability to the true owner, knowingly appropriate to the satisfaction of a debt due to it by another trust funds deposited with it by him after the creation of such debt.” *American Trust &c. Co.*v. *Boone,*102 *Ga.*202 (29 S. E. 182, 40 L. R. A. 250, 66 Am. St. R. 167); *Miller*v. *Gibbs,*161 *Ga.*698 (5) (132 S. E. 626).

2. “All persons aiding and assisting trustees of any character, with a knowledge of their misconduct, in misapplying assets, are directly accountable to the persons injured.” Civil Code (1910), § 3784. Where an administrator has misappropriated funds of which he was in charge as such trustee, an action to trace and recover such funds from the person alleged to have received the same from the administrator may be brought by the heirs at law in their own names. In such a case it is not necessary that the suit should be brought by an administrator or other official representative of the estate. This ruling is not in conflict with such decisions as *Smith*v. *Smith,*141 *Ga.*629 (7) (81 S. E. 895), *745and *Denny*v. *Gardner,*149 *Ga.*42 (99 S. E. 27), but is in harmony, therewith.

No. 8700.

September 26, 1932.

3. “A defect in a petition resulting from a nonjoinder of proper parties can not be taken advantage of by general demurrer.” *Ray*v. *Pitman,*119 *Ga.*678 (2) (46 8. E. 849). The petition alleges that the plaintiffs were some of the heirs at law of the estate. If these plaintiffs themselves were proper parties and as such were entitled to participate in maintaining the action, it was not a good ground of general demurrer that other heirs at law were not joined as plaintiffs. *Hunt*v. *Doyal,*128 *Ga.*416 (3) (57 S. E. 489); *Cook*v. *McArthur,*31 *Ga. App.*248 (120 S. E. 551), and oit.

4. Under the rulings made above, the petition stated a cause of action, and it was error to dismiss the same on general demurrer. It appearing-from the record that the order sustaining the demurrer was limited to the general grounds, the special grounds of demurrej: will not be considered by this court, but will be left for subsequent determination by the trial court. *Willingham*v. *Glover,*28 *Ga. App.*394 (111 S. E. 206), and cit. *Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*747W. *T. Burkhalter,*for plaintiffs. P. *M. Anderson,*for persons at interest, not parties of record.

*J. T. Once,*for defendant.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 21740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10099]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Intent To File Application for a New License

April 18, 2000.
    Take notice that the following notice of intent has been filed with 
the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of filing: Notice of Intent to File an Application for New 
License.
    b. Project No.: 2130.
    c. Date filed: July 28, 1999.
    d. Submitted By: Pacific Gas and Electric company, current 
licensee.
    e. Name of Project: Spring Gap-Stanislaus.
    f. Location: On the South and Middle Forks of the Stanislaus River 
in Tuolumne and Calaveras Counties, California.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Section 15 of the Federal Power Act, 18 CFR 
16.6.
    h. Pursuant to Section 16.19 of the Commission's regulations, the 
licensee is required to make available the information described in 
Section 16.7 of the regulations. Such information is available from the 
licensee at 245 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105. 
Interested parties can contact Richard Doble on (415) 973-4480.
    i. FERC Contact: Hector M. Perez, (202) 219-2843, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#276f424453485509574255425d674142554409414243095254"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6b230e081f0419451b0e190e112b0d0e1908450d0e0f451e18">[email protected]</span></a>.
    j. Expiration Date of Current License: December 31, 2004.
    k. The project consists of the Spring Gap Powerhouse with an 
installed capacity of 7,500 kVA and the Stanislaus Powerhouse with an 
installed capacity of 91,000 kVA.
    l. The licensee states its unequivocal intent to submit an 
application for a new license for Project No. 2130. Pursuant to 18 CFR 
16.9(b)(1) each application for a new license and any competing license 
applications must be filed with the Commission at least 24 months prior 
to the expiration of the existing license. All applications for license 
for this project must be filed by December 31, 2002.
    m. A copy of the notice of intent is available for inspection and 
reproduction at the Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 
First Street, NE, Room 2A, Washington, D.C. 20426, or by calling (202) 
208-1371. The notice may be viewed on http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call (202) 208-222 for assistance). A copy is also available 
for inspection and reproduction at the address in item h above.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-10099 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 15.2**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 RegistrationNo. 333-124881) pertaining to the Top 10 Share Bonus Plan, the Group 50 Share Bonus Plan and theGroup 70 Share Bonus Plan of Petroleum Geo-Services ASA(“PGS”) of our reports dated May 15, 2007,with respect to the consolidated financial statements of PGS, PGS management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of PGS included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the yearended December 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young AS Oslo, NorwayMay 15, 2007
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3234

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 14 Chestnut Street in Liberty, New York, 

as the ‘‘Ben R. Gerow Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3234 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 14 Chestnut Street in Liberty, New York, shall 

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Ben R. Gerow Post Of5 fice Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Ben R. Gerow Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 28, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
§ 615.5240 Regulatory capital requirements. ( a ) The capitalization bylaws shall enable the institution to meet the capital adequacy standards established under subpart H of this part, part 628 of this chapter, and the capital requirements established by the board of directors of the System institution.
( b ) In order to qualify as permanent capital, equities issued under the bylaws must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Retirement must be solely at the discretion of the board of directors and not upon a date certain (other than the original maturity date of preferred stock) or upon the happening of any event, such as repayment of the loan, and not pursuant to any automatic retirement or revolvement plan;
( 2 ) Retirement must be at not more than book value;
( 3 ) The institution must have made the disclosures required by this subpart;
( 4 ) For common stock and participation certificates, dividends must be noncumulative and payable only at the discretion of the board; and
( 5 ) For cumulative preferred stock, the board of directors must have discretion to defer payment of dividends.
[81 FR 49776, July 28, 2016]
§ 7.1000 Activities that are part of, or incidental to, the business of banking. ( a ) *Purpose.* This section identifies the criteria that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) uses to determine whether an activity is authorized as part of, or incidental to, the business of banking under 12 U.S.C. 24(Seventh) or other statutory authority.
( b ) *Restrictions and conditions on activities.* The OCC may determine that activities are permissible under 12 U.S.C. 24(Seventh) or other statutory authority only if they are subject to standards or conditions designed to provide that the activities function as intended and are conducted safely and soundly, in accordance with other applicable statutes, regulations, or supervisory policies.
( c ) *Activities that are part of the business of banking.* ( 1 ) An activity is permissible for national banks as part of the business of banking if the activity is authorized under 12 U.S.C. 24(Seventh) or other statutory authority. In determining whether an activity that is not specifically included in 12 U.S.C. 24(Seventh) or other statutory authority is part of the business of banking, the OCC considers the following factors: ( i ) Whether the activity is the functional equivalent to, or a logical outgrowth of, a recognized banking activity;
( ii ) Whether the activity strengthens the bank by benefiting its customers or its business;
( iii ) Whether the activity involves risks similar in nature to those already assumed by banks; and
( iv ) Whether the activity is authorized for State-chartered banks.
( 2 ) The weight accorded each factor set out in paragraph (c)(1) of this section depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.
( d ) *Activities that are incidental to the business of banking.* ( 1 ) An activity is authorized for a national bank as incidental to the business of banking if it is convenient or useful to an activity that is specifically authorized for national banks or to an activity that is otherwise part of the business of banking. In determining whether an activity is convenient or useful to such activities, the OCC considers the following factors: ( i ) Whether the activity facilitates the production or delivery of a bank's products or services, enhances the bank's ability to sell or market its products or services, or improves the effectiveness or efficiency of the bank's operations, in light of risks presented, innovations, strategies, techniques and new technologies for producing and delivering financial products and services; and
( ii ) Whether the activity enables the bank to use capacity acquired for its banking operations or otherwise avoid economic loss or waste.
( 2 ) The weight accorded each factor set out in paragraph (d)(1) of this section depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.
[85 FR 83726, Dec. 22, 2020]
# C_2022221EN.01000401.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

3 June 2022

(2022/C 221/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0730 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4388 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85420 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4589 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0296 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1030 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,708 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 394,78 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5955 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9428 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 17,7380 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4805 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3484 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4167 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6409 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4741 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 337,40 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,6153 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1465 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5220 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 498,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7094 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,738 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,777 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,1643 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,9850 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,2730 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0730

JPY

Japanese yen

139,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4388

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85420

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4589

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0296

ISK

Iceland króna

137,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1030

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,708

HUF

Hungarian forint

394,78

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5955

RON

Romanian leu

4,9428

TRY

Turkish lira

17,7380

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4805

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3484

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4167

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6409

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4741

KRW

South Korean won

1 337,40

ZAR

South African rand

16,6153

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1465

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5220

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 498,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7094

PHP

Philippine peso

56,738

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,777

BRL

Brazilian real

5,1643

MXN

Mexican peso

20,9850

INR

Indian rupee

83,2730

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### §§ 410.161-410.169 [Reserved]