alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-209-000]

                    In the Commission’s order issued on March 31, 2000,[1]                                          the Commission directed that a technical conference be held to address issues raised by the filing.                 

Take notice that the technical conference will be held on Tuesday, May 2, 2000, at 10:00 am in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426.

All interested parties and Staff are permitted to attend.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             90 FERC 61,348 (2000).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-10105  Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 8, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 04-51072

_____________________

JAMES T. HOOTEN,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CITY OF HONDO; ET AL.,

Defendants,

ANDY CHERNAK; DON BERGER,

Defendants - Appellants.

__________________________________________________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:03-CV-1218

_________________________________________________________________

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After a study of the briefs and record and after oral

argument, we are convinced in this very close case that the

district court committed no reversible error in denying qualified

immunity in the light of the factual disputes that remain.

Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER D ENYING M OTION FOR E N B ANC R ECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: In re Ryan Seales

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00324

- CR

Trial court case number: 1561941

Trial court: 228th District C ourt of Harris County

Date Motion filed: Ju ly 20 , 2022

Party filing motion: Relator

The en banc court unanimously voted to deny Relator’s Motion for En Banc

Reconsideration . It is ordered that the motion is denied

.

Judge’s signature:

__ /s/ Julie C o un tiss

__ Acting f or the Court

* En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau,

Hightower, Countiss, Rivas

- Molloy, Guerra, and Farris.

Date: August 25, 2022
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Liberty County Mutual Insurance Company

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00141

- CV

Trial court case number: 2017

- 52441

Trial court: 234th District Court of Harr is County

Rea l party in interest

, Martina M. Valyan, has filed a n unopposed second motion for

ext ension of time in which t o file her response to relator ’ s petition for writ of mandamus. Real

party in interest ’ s motion is granted . Real party in interest ’ s response is due June 1 8 , 20 21.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Ju lie Countiss

_____ Acting individually

Date: June 1 5 , 2021
§ 48.1 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority* — ( 1 ) *National banks.* A national bank may offer or enter into retail foreign exchange transactions. A national bank offering or entering into retail foreign exchange transactions must comply with the requirements of this part.
( 2 ) *Federal savings associations.* A Federal savings association may offer or enter into retail foreign exchange transactions. A Federal savings association offering or entering into retail foreign exchange transactions must comply with the requirements of this part as if each reference to a national bank were a reference to a Federal savings association.
( b ) *Purpose.* This part establishes rules applicable to retail foreign exchange transactions engaged in by national banks and applies on or after the effective date.
( c ) *Scope.* Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, this part applies to national banks.
( d ) *International applicability.* Sections 48.3 and 48.5 to 48.16 do not apply to retail foreign exchange transactions between a foreign branch of a national bank and a non-U.S. customer. With respect to those transactions, the foreign branch remains subject to any disclosure, recordkeeping, capital, margin, reporting, business conduct, documentation, and other requirements of foreign law applicable to the branch.
[76 FR 41384, July 14, 2011, as amended at 76 FR 56096, Sept. 12, 2011]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

PORTIONS OF THE EXHIBIT MARKED BY "*" HAVE BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST
FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 406 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS
AMENDED. THE COMPLETE EXHIBIT, INCLUDING THE PORTIONS FOR WHICH CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED, HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                               2001 INCENTIVE PLAN




For the 2001 fiscal year, a corporate executive will be awarded 100% of his or
her target bonus amount (target amounts established at the Feb. 8th Compensation
Committee) if the Company's EBITDA reaches its established budget for the year
(************). An employee's actual bonus may vary above and below his or her
target according to the schedule below:

         EBITDA                                Bonus Amount

Below **************                No bonus amount

*********** to ***********          50% - 100% of target on a pro rata basis

*********** to ***********          100% - 150% of target on a pro rata basis

*********** to ***********          150% - 175% of target on a pro rata basis


Adjustments to the EBITDA targets shown above will be made for acquisitions
made during the year in amounts agreed upon by the Compensation Committee and
Executive Management of the Company. Adjustments to the EBITDA targets shown
above will be made for capital expenditures that exceed the capital expenditure
budget for fiscal 2001 in amounts agreed upon by the Compensation Committee and
Executive Management. Actual EBITDA for the year used for incentive plan
calculations will exclude ***************** such as ************************.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                Exhibit 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT



We hereby consent to the use in the Form 10-KSB Annual Report of Saf T Lok 
Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 1996, our report dated April 10, 
1997, relating to the financial statements of Saf T Lok Incorporated which 
appear in such Form 10-KSB


                                        /s/ Weinberg & Company PA
                                        
                                        WEINBERG & COMPANY, P.A.
                                        F/K/A WEINBERG, PERSHES & COMPANY, P.A.
                                        Certified Public Accountants


Boca Raton, Florida
April 14, 1998
#### § 7.2012 President as director of a national bank.

Pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 76, the person serving as, or in the function of, president of a national bank, regardless of title, must be a member of the board of directors. A director other than the person serving as, or in the function of, president may be elected chairman of the board.

[85 FR 83735, Dec. 22, 2020]
EVO TECH ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT


         THIS  AGREEMENT  dated this 25th day of May, 2001 between Argo,  Inc. a
Israeli   corporation   ("Assignor");   Safetek  Acquisition  Corp.  a  Delaware
corporation ("Assignee"); and Evo Tech, Inc. ("Evo Tech").

                             W I T N E S S E S T H :

         WHEREAS,  Assignor is a party to that certain  contract  (the "Evo Tech
Consulting  Agreement") dated  ____________  _____,  2001,  between Argo and Evo
Tech, Inc;

         WHEREAS,  Assignor  wishes  to  assign  its  interest  in the Evo  Tech
Consulting  Agreement  to  Assignee,  and  Assignee  is willing  to accept  such
assignment;

         WHEREAS,  Evo Tech is also a party to the Evo Tech Consulting Agreement
between Argo and Evo Tech,  and Evo Tech is willing to consent to the Assignment
by  Assignor  to  Asignee  of  Assignor's  interest  in the Evo Tech  Consulting
Agreement.

                           N O W   T H E R E F O R E ,

         In  consideration  of the  Premises  and for  other  good and  valuable
consideration, the Parties hereto agree that:

         1. Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee, and Assignee hereby irrevocably
and unconditionally assumes, all of the rights,  conditions,  and obligations of
Assignor in the Evo Tech Consulting Agreement between Argo and Evo Tech.

         2.  Evo Tech hereby consents to the foregoing Assignment.




Argo, Inc.                                    Safetek Acquisition, Inc.
(Assignor)                                    (Assignee)

By: ______________________________            By: ______________________________
    Zvi Nachum, President                         Shmuel M. Shneibalg, President



Evo Tech, Inc.

By: ______________________________
    Bosilio Chen, President
#### LOFFLAND v. RUSSELL.

Fraud — want of consideration — mistake—evidence—court and jury.

If a note was obtained by fraud, or given for a consideration, which has failed, or by mistake, the defence may be made in a suit between the parties.

Evidence tending to prove any aspect of the issue, should be admitted to the jury.

A court should not substitute its own judgment for that of a jury, on facts.

Error to the Common Pleas. Russell brought assumpsit against Loffiand, on the following due bill: ‘I)u.e Wayne Russell, twenty days after date, $}15 50, for value received.’ Plea, non assumpsit, with notice, that the note was obtained by fraud.

On trial, the plaintiff read the due bill in evidence, and rested his case. Loffiand then offered to prove, that he had *agreed*with Russell to burn a pit of charcoal for him, and found him the wood and an assistant, and that some time afterwards Russell called on him, said ho had burned the coal, and demanded a note, and placing confidence in his representations, having been absent and being ignorant of the facts, he gave his due bill, which is the same in evidence, and that in fact Russell never burnt the coal, and had wasted the wood. This evidence was objected to by Russell, and ruled out by the court, on the ground that if admitted, it would not warrant the jury in finding fraud, or want, of consideration, of value, sufficient *439to avoid the note. For error in ruling out the evidence, it is now sought to reverse the judgment.

*Parker*and Burr, for the plaintiff in error.

Purdy, contra.

Wright, J.

If the note was obtained by fraud, or given for a consideration, which had failed, by mistake, or without any consideration, either state of things might be shown, and would constitute a complete defence, as between the parties. If the evidence offered and ruled out, then, tended to prove either assumption, it was competent, and ought to have been admitted to the jury, and the effect of it left to them. We think the evidence to prove them admissible. The court, therefore, .erred in ruling out the evidence, and substituting its own judgment of the facts, for that of the jury.

The judgment is reversed, and remanded for future proceeding.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Advisory Committee Mathematical and Physical Sciences (#66).                    

*Date/Time:*                         November 4, 2009 2 p.m.-4 p.m., November 5, 2009 8 a.m.-6 p.m., November 6, 2009 8 a.m.-3 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. November 5, Room 1005, November 6 & 7, Room 1235.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Morris L. Aizenman, Senior Science Associate, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Room 1005, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 292-8807.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning NSF science and education activities within the Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences.                    

*Agenda:*                         Briefing to new members about NSF and Directorate (11/4). Update on current status of Directorate. Reports from liaisons with other Advisory Committees. Meeting of MPSAC with Divisions within MPS Directorate. Discussion of MPS Long-term Planning Areas.                    

*Summary Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                    

Dated: October 9, 2009.

Susanne E. Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-24743 Filed 10-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
EXHIBIT A 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22690-1 Filed:10/26/22 Entered:10/26/22 12:17:39 Desc:

Exhibit A - Party Appearance Sheet Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT A 

PARTY APPEARANCE SHEET

NAME OF PARTY Assured Guaranty Corp. and Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. 

 Appearance Method In Person NY 

Name William J. Natbony 

Law Firm Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Email bill.natbony@cwt.com

Phone Number (212) 504 6351

Docket Entry No. of Notice Of 

Appearance 

ECF No. 3676

ATTORNEY 2 Appearance Method In Person NY 

Name Casey J. Servais 

Law Firm Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP 

Email casey.servais@cwt.com 

Phone Number (212) 504 6193 

Docket Entry No. of Notice Of 

Appearance 

ECF No. 121 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22690-1 Filed:10/26/22 Entered:10/26/22 12:17:39 Desc:

Exhibit A - Party Appearance Sheet Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Ralph C. Guild, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    RALPH C. GUILD                            
|                   |  |  |  | Ralph C. Guild                                   
|                   |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3307 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3307

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to create the Federal crime of 
                             eco-terrorism.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 16, 2003

Mr. Chocola (for himself, Mr. Davis of Tennessee, Mr. Cole, Mr. Rogers 
   of Michigan, Ms. Harris, Mr. Schrock, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. 
   Sherwood, Mr. Barrett of South Carolina, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. 
Souder, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Porter, Mrs. Miller of 
 Michigan, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. LaHood, Mr. Renzi, Mr. McCotter, 
 Mr. Feeney, Mr. Carter, Mr. English, Ms. Hart, Mr. Putnam, Mr. Otter, 
    Mr. Chabot, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. 
Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Ryun 
 of Kansas, Mr. Herger, Mr. Buyer, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Ney, Mr. Weldon of 
Florida, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Burns, Mrs. Musgrave, Mr. Gibbons, and Mr. 
    Nunes) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to create the Federal crime of 
                             eco-terrorism.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Terrorism of Property Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. ECO-TERRORISM.

    (a) Offense.--Chapter 113B of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 2339D. Eco-terrorism
    ``Whoever, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, 
intentionally damages the property of another with the intent to 
influence the public with regard to conduct the offender considers 
harmful to the environment shall--
            ``(1) if death results from the conduct constituting the 
        offense, be fined under this title and imprisoned for any term 
        of years or for life;
            ``(2) if serious bodily injury results from the conduct 
        constituting the offense, be fined under this title and 
        imprisoned not more than 10 years; and
            ``(3) in any other case, be fined under this title or 
        imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment to Table of Sections.--The table of sections 
at the beginning of chapter 113B of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``2339D. Eco-terrorism.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             346
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,060
<INVENTORY>                                     42,252
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,680
<PP&E>                                          38,427
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,036
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,079
<BONDS>                                         35,027
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,790
<SALES>                                         31,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,338
<CGS>                                           26,373
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,452
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   330
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 585
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    586
<INCOME-TAX>                                       228
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                370
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       370
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

OFFICER CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Lenox Group Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 29, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Form 10-K), each of the
undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|      |                |  |                                                    
|----- | -------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date: | March 13, 2008 |  | /s/ Marc L. Pfefferle                              
|      |                |  |                                                    
|      |                |  | Marc L. Pfefferle                                  
|      |                |  | Interim Chief Executive Officer                    
|     
|     
|Date: | March 13, 2008 |  | /s/ Fred Spivak                                    
|      |                |  |                                                    
|      |                |  | Fred Spivak                                        
|      |                |  | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a
separate disclosure document.

---
#### § 107.52 ATC transponder equipment prohibition.

Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, no person may operate a small unmanned aircraft system under this part with a transponder on.

[Amdt. No. 107-7, 86 FR 4513, Jan. 15, 2021]