alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014344EN.01001401.xml

| 2.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/14

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

2014/C 344/09

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 18 June 2014 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 74204 |
| Decision No | : | 225/14/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Region | : | All very sparsely populated regions |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Regionally differentiated social security contribution |
| Legal basis | : | The annual Resolution of the Parliament on rates for social security contributions etc., and Section 23-2 of Act No 19 of 28 February 1997 relating to the National Insurance Scheme (Folketrygdloven) |
| Type of measure | : | Operating aid |
| Objective | : | To reduce or prevent depopulation in the least populated regions in Norway by stimulating employment in these regions |
| Form of aid | : | Tax reduction |
| Budget | : | Fiscal effect approximately EUR 900 million annually |
| Intensity | : | 3,1 to 12,4 |
| Duration | : | 1 July 2014 to 31 December 2020 |
| Economic sectors | : | Horizontal. All sectors covered by the Regional Aid Guidelines 2014-2020 |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Government of Norway |
| Other information | : | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

18 June 2014

Case number

Case number

:

74204

Decision No

Decision No

:

225/14/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Region

Region

:

All very sparsely populated regions

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Regionally differentiated social security contribution

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

The annual Resolution of the Parliament on rates for social security contributions etc., and Section 23-2 of Act No 19 of 28 February 1997 relating to the National Insurance Scheme (Folketrygdloven)

Folketrygdloven

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Operating aid

Objective

Objective

:

To reduce or prevent depopulation in the least populated regions in Norway by stimulating employment in these regions

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Tax reduction

Budget

Budget

:

Fiscal effect approximately EUR 900 million annually

Intensity

Intensity

:

3,1 to 12,4

Duration

Duration

:

1 July 2014 to 31 December 2020

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Horizontal. All sectors covered by the Regional Aid Guidelines 2014-2020

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Government of Norway

Other information

Other information

:

—

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
EXHIBIT 10.6

November 8, 1996


Mr. Richard W. Smith
President
Strategia Corporation
P.O. Box 37144
Louisville, KY  40233-7144

RE:  The Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement dated July 1, 1992 and 
     subsequently amended by and between Star Bank, N.A. (the "Bank") and 
     Dataguard Recovery Services, Inc. (the "Company") now known as Strategia
     Corporation (said agreement shall hereinafter be referred to as the
     "Agreement").

Dear Mr. Smith:

This letter, when duly and validly accepted by the Company, shall evidence 
the intention of the Bank to amend the above referenced Agreement and 
Promissory Note such that:

1)  The Maturity Date of the Revolving Credit facility shall be extended
    to October 31, 1997.

2)  The Revolving Note shall bear interest at 2.0% over the Bank's prime 
    rate (the "Prime Rate").  The Prime Rate is currently 8.25%.

3)  The Company hereby agrees to reduce the subject Revolving Credit Facility
    to zero upon execution of this Agreement and any future advances shall be
    upon approval of the Bank.

As a condition to the effectiveness of this amendment, the Company shall pay
the Bank a $100 renewal fee and execute the promissory note attached hereto.

All representations and warranties of the Company set forth in the Agreement
are true and correct as of the date hereof.  Except as amended herein, all 
other terms, conditions and covenants of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.

If the above terms represent our understanding, please indicate your 
agreement by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to me.

Sincerely,

/s/ Edward L. Dwyer

Edward L. Dwyer
Vice President

Accepted this 18th day of November, 1996.

Strategia Corporation


By:  /s/ Richard W. Smith
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3417 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3417

  To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit the operation in 
  certain metropolitan areas of civil subsonic turbojets that fail to 
                   comply with stage 3 noise levels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2003

 Mr. Rothman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit the operation in 
  certain metropolitan areas of civil subsonic turbojets that fail to 
                   comply with stage 3 noise levels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Aircraft Noise Reduction Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. AIRCRAFT NOISE REDUCTION IN CERTAIN METROPOLITAN AREAS.

    Section 47528 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(h) Special Rule for Airports in Certain Metropolitan Areas.--
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person may operate after 
the date of enactment of this subsection any civil subsonic turbojet 
that fails to comply with stage 3 noise levels to or from an airport 
located in any of the 20 most populated metropolitan areas in the 
United States, as determined by the Secretary.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 21.1

                  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF BLUE VALLEY BAN CORP

                                  Exhibit 21.1

                              Blue Valley Ban Corp.

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

Subsidiaries of Blue Valley Ban Corp.

1.   Bank of Blue Valley - Incorporated in Kansas

2.   Blue Valley Building Corp. - Incorporated in Kansas

3.   BVBC Capital Trust II - Organized under the laws of the State of Delaware

4.   BVBC Capital Trust III - Organized under the laws of the State of Delaware

5.   Blue Valley Insurance Services, Inc. - Incorporated in Kansas

Subsidiary of Bank of Blue Valley

     1.   Blue Valley Investment Corporation - Incorporated in Kansas

     2.   BBV Accommodations, LLC - Incorporated in Kansas
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53242-53243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25065]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

    Date: October 21, 2009-10 a.m.

[[Page 53243]]

    Place: 800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, 
Washington, DC.
    Status: A portion of the meeting will be in Open Session and the 
remainder of the meeting will be in Closed Session.
    Matters to be Considered:

Open Session

    1. Discussion of Court of Appeals Mandate in Landstar.
    2. Briefing on Conclusion of FY 2009 Budget.

Closed Session

    1. World Chance Logistics (Hong Kong).
    2. Lindblad Expeditions, Inc.--Evidence of Financial 
Responsibility.
    3. Staff Briefing Regarding Global Economic Downturn and Potential 
Impact on Stakeholders.
    Contact Person for More Information: Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, 
(202) 523-5725.

Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-25065 Filed 10-14-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Aldila, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of Aldila, Inc. hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aldila, Inc.

|/s/ Peter R. MathewsonPeter R. Mathewson
Chief Executive Officer | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Robert J. CierzanRobert J. Cierzan
Chief Financial Officer   | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aldila, Inc. and will be retained by Aldila, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

March 28,
2008

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 28.1
                                       ------------ 
            ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE
                 UCFC LOAN TRUST 1997-A                                
 
    In accordance with Section 9.16 of that certain Pooling and
 Servicing Agreement relating to UCFC Loan Trust 1997-A dated as
 of March 1, 1997 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), by and
 among UCFC Acceptance Corporation, as depositor, United Companies 
 Lending Corporation, as servicer (the "Servicer"), and Bankers Trust
 Company of California, N.A., as trustee, the undersigned officer
 of the Servicer does hereby certify as follows: (i) a review of
 the activities of the Servicer during 1997 and of performance
 under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under the
 undersigned officer's supervision; and (ii) to the best of such
 undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review, the
 Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling
 and Servicing Agreement for 1997.
 
    EXECUTED this 26th day of March, 1998.
 
 
                                                                 
                        /s/ C. GERON HARGON
                        -------------------------------
                            C. Geron Hargon
                            President
                            United Companies Lending Corporation
     

                         PAGE 7
In Special Term —

May 1855. —

Spencer, J. presiding.

#### MARGARET FLYNN, administratrix of JAMES FLYNN, *vs.*PHILIP HIRSCHAUER and JOHN B. *McCLYMON.*

An action for a malicious prosecution does not abate by the death of the plaintiffs pending the action.

This was an action brought, by James Flynn in his life time, to recover .damages for an alleged malicious prosecution. During the pendency of the action he died, and his widow, the present plaintiff, took out letters of administration upon his estate, and, suggesting his death, moved to be made.a party plaintiff, and to proceed with the action. It was contended by defendants, that the action abated by death of the plaintiff.

R. D. & J. H. Handy, for the motion.

Fox & French, contra.

Spencer, J.

Section 899 of the Code provides, that *“no action pending*in any court, shall abate by the death of either or both the parties thereto, except an action for libel, slander, malicious prosecution, assault, or assault and battery, for a nuisance, or against a Justice of the Peace for misconduct in office, which shall abate by the death of the *defen*dant.” We do not think the action *abates*by the death of the *plaintiff.*

The motion will, therefore, be sustained.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Adeza Biomedical Corporation CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Adeza Biomedical Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Mark D. Fischer-Colbrie, Vice President of Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Mark D. Fischer-Colbrie
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I hereby  certify that,  to my knowledge,  the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), for the quarter ended June 30, 2004:

     1. fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 12, 2004                     By:  /s/ Francis K. Ruotolo
       ---------------                          --------------------------------
                                                Francis K. Ruotolo, Chairman and
                                                Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  has  been  provided  to the  Company,  and  will be
retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request.
§ 613.3000 Financing for farmers, ranchers, and aquatic producers or harvesters. ( a ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply: ( 1 ) *Bona fide farmer or rancher* means a person owning agricultural land or engaged in the production of agricultural products, including aquatic products under controlled conditions.
( 2 ) *Legal entity* means any partnership, corporation, estate, trust, or other legal entity that is established pursuant to the laws of the United States, any State thereof, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, or any tribal authority and is legally authorized to conduct a business.
( 3 ) *Person* means a legal entity or an individual who is a citizen of the United States or a foreign national who has been lawfully admitted into the United States either for permanent residency pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(20) or on a visa pursuant to a provision in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15) that authorizes such individual to own property or operate or manage a business or a legal entity.
( 4 ) *Producer or harvester of aquatic products* means a person engaged in producing or harvesting aquatic products for economic gain in open waters under uncontrolled conditions.
( b ) *Eligible borrower.* Farm Credit institutions that operate under titles I or II of the Act may provide financing to a bona fide farmer or rancher, or producer or harvester of aquatic products for any agricultural or aquatic purpose and for other credit needs.
[62 FR 4441, Jan. 30, 1997, as amended at 73 FR 30475, May 28, 2008]
EXHIBIT 10.21.3

October 27, 1999

JetForm Corporation
560 Rochester Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1S 5K2

Attention:        Mr. Jeff McMullen
                  Chief Financial Officer

Dear Sirs:

Further  to our  recent  discussions,  we are  pleased  to offer  the  following
amendments  to the letter  agreement  dated April 7, 1999 between  Royal Bank of
Canada and JetForm Corporation (the "Agreement"):

7.   Repayment:

     In  sub-paragraph  1, each of the dates  September  30,  1999 is amended to
November 30, 1999.

     In  sub-paragraph  4, the date of June 30,  2000 is amended to  February 1,
2001.

8.   Availability:

     Sub-paragraph 1 (a) (ii) is amended with the addition "where such insurance
has been formally assigned to the bank".

     Sub-paragraph 4 (a) is deleted and replaced with the following:

     "Borrowings under this segment must not exceed 25% of the aggregate of (all
on a consolidated basis):

     -    Cash, net of any short term operating loans
     -    Cash equivalents
     -    Trade accounts  receivable  falling due within the next twelve months,
          but excluding amounts 90 days or more past due".

     Sub-paragraph 4 (e) is amended to read February 1, 2001.

20.  Periodic Review

     The date is amended to November 30, 1999.

An extension  fee of .15% is payable with respect to Segment (4). The  extension
fee is  non-refundable  and will be deemed to have been  earned by the Bank upon
acceptance of this amendment to compensate for time, effort and expense incurred
by the Bank in extending this facility.  All other terms of the Agreement remain
unchanged.

This amendment  expires if not accepted by November 19, 1999 unless  extended in
writing by the Bank. If this agreement is acceptable, kindly sign and return the
attached copy to the attention of the writer.

Yours truly,



We acknowledge and accept the within
terms and conditions.

JETFORM CORPORATION

Per: ______________________________________________

Per: ______________________________________________

Date: ______________________________________________
#### § 703.7 Notice of non-compliant investments.

A Federal credit union's board of directors must receive notice as soon as possible, but no later than the next regularly scheduled board meeting, of any investment that either is outside of board policy after purchase or has failed a requirement of this part. The board of directors must document its action regarding the investment in the minutes of the board meeting, including a detailed explanation of any decision not to sell it. The Federal credit union must notify in writing the appropriate regional director of an investment that has failed a requirement of this part within 5 days after the board meeting.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZHUCHENG GAO,

 Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-72021

Agency No. A089-968-749

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 15, 2016**

Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Zhucheng Gao, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum and 

 

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without 

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 21 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

13-72021

withholding of removal, and denying his motion to remand. We have jurisdiction 

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual 

findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations 

created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-1040 (9th 

Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility finding based 

on Gao’s admitted lies and omissions about his residence and employment, and

inconsistent account of his U.S. church attendance. See Singh v. Holder, 643 F.3d 

1178, 1181 (9th Cir. 2011) (“An asylum applicant who lies to immigration 

authorities casts doubt on his credibility and the rest of his story.”); Shrestha, 590 

F.3d at 1048 (adverse credibility determination reasonable under the totality of the 

circumstances). We reject Gao’s contentions that the IJ engaged in improper 

conjecture or was biased. In the absence of credible testimony, Gao’s asylum and 

withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 

(9th Cir. 2003).

As to the motion to remand, Gao does not challenge the BIA’s dispositive 

finding that he failed to present evidence that was previously unavailable. See 

Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (“Issues raised in 

a brief that are not supported by argument are deemed abandoned.”).
3

13-72021

The 60-day stay of proceedings granted on December 1, 2015, has expired. 

Respondent's motion to lift the stay is denied as moot.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
§ 369.4 Credit needs determination. ( a ) *In general.* The FDIC will review the loan portfolio of the bank and determine whether the bank is reasonably helping to meet the credit needs of the communities in the host state that are served by the bank.
( b ) *Guidelines.* The FDIC will use the following considerations as guidelines when making the determination pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) Whether covered interstate branches were formerly part of a failed or failing depository institution;
( 2 ) Whether covered interstate branches were acquired under circumstances where there was a low loan-to-deposit ratio because of the nature of the acquired institution's business or loan portfolio;
( 3 ) Whether covered interstate branches have a high concentration of commercial or credit card lending, trust services, or other specialized activities, including the extent to which the covered interstate branches accept deposits in the host state;
( 4 ) The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) ratings received by the bank, if any, under 12 U.S.C. 2901 *et seq.;*
( 5 ) Economic conditions, including the level of loan demand, within the communities served by the covered interstate branches;
( 6 ) The safe and sound operation and condition of the bank; and
( 7 ) The FDIC's Community Reinvestment regulations (12 CFR Part 345) and interpretations of those regulations.
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3175

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 2650 Cleveland Avenue, NW in Canton, Ohio,

as the ‘‘Richard D. Watkins Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3175 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 2650 Cleveland Avenue, NW in Canton, Ohio,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Richard D. Wat5 kins Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Richard D. Watkins Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 28,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3175

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2650 Cleveland Avenue, NW

in Canton, Ohio, as the ‘‘Richard D. WatkinsPost Office Building’’.