alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3536 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3536

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 210 Main Street in Malden, Illinois, as the ``Army Staff Sgt. 
                Lincoln Hollinsaid Malden Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2003

    Mr. Weller (for himself, Mr. Rush, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mr. 
Lipinski, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Emanuel, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Davis of Illinois, 
 Mr. Crane, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Costello, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. 
Hastert, Mr. Johnson of Illinois, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Evans, Mr. LaHood, 
 and Mr. Shimkus) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 210 Main Street in Malden, Illinois, as the ``Army Staff Sgt. 
                Lincoln Hollinsaid Malden Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ARMY STAFF SGT. LINCOLN HOLLINSAID MALDEN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 210 Main Street in Malden, Illinois, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Army Staff Sgt. Lincoln Hollinsaid Malden Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Army Staff 
Sgt. Lincoln Hollinsaid Malden Post Office.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40006 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ARTURO MEZA, also known as Junior,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:98 -CR- 47 -9

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Arturo Meza, federal prisoner # 07092

- 078, was convicted by a jury of conspiracy and substantive drug offenses involving the distribution of heroin and cocaine. He was sentenced to 360 months of imprisonment on five of the counts and 240 months of imprisonment on two of the counts. Seeking a reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), Meza
contends that there is an unwarranted disparity between his sentence and that

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fif h Circuit 

### FILED August 25, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40006 Document: 00514131569 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/25/2017No. 17

- 40006

2 of his brother and co -defendant , who was convicted in the same case and
received a § 3582(c)(2) reduct ion. The district court denied Meza’s motion on the basis that the guideline amendment did not affect Meza’s guideline range because his base offense level was based on the deaths or serious bodily injuries that resulted from his heroin distribution, not the quantity of drugs he
distributed.
Meza does not address the district court’s determination that he was not eligible for a reduction because his offense level was not affected by the amendment. Even if he were eligible, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a reduction for the reason argued by Meza. Meza does not allege any facts suggesting that there is an unwarranted sentencing disparity among similarly situated defendants. He provides no details of any similarities between his and his brother’s offense conduct, criminal records, other history, or characteristics. His conclusory assertion that his brother is similarly situated fails to show that an unwarranted disparity exists. See United States v. Guillermo Balleza , 613 F.3 d 432, 435 (5th Cir. 2010). The fact
that a co

- defendant received a sentence reduction does not alone show that the denial of Meza ’s § 3582(c)(2) motion created an unwarranted sentencing disparity. See United States v. Smith , 595 F.3d 1322, 1323 (5th Cir. 2010). The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Meza’s § 3582(c)(2) motion. United States v. Evans , 587 F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009). AFFIRMED. Case: 17-40006 Document: 00514131569 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/25/2017
Editorial Note on Part 702
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 702 appear at 84 FR 1606, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 702.101 Capital measures, capital adequacy, effective date of classification, and notice to NCUA. ( a ) *Capital measures.* For purposes of this part, a credit union must determine its capital classification at the end of each calendar quarter using the following measures: ( 1 ) The net worth ratio; and
( 2 ) If determined to be applicable under § 702.103, either the risk-based capital ratio under § 702.104(a) through (c) or the CCULR framework under § 702.104(d).
( b ) *Capital adequacy.* ( 1 ) Notwithstanding the minimum requirements in this part, a credit union defined as complex must maintain capital commensurate with the level and nature of all risks to which the institution is exposed.
( 2 ) A credit union defined as complex must have a process for assessing its overall capital adequacy in relation to its risk profile and a comprehensive written strategy for maintaining an appropriate level of capital.
( c ) *Effective date of capital classification.* For purposes of this part, the effective date of a federally insured credit union's capital classification shall be the most recent to occur of: ( 1 ) *Quarter-end effective date.* The last day of the calendar month following the end of the calendar quarter;
( 2 ) *Corrected capital classification.* The date the credit union received subsequent written notice from NCUA or, if state-chartered, from the appropriate state official, of a decline in capital classification due to correction of an error or misstatement in the credit union's most recent Call Report; or
( 3 ) *Reclassification to lower category.* The date the credit union received written notice from NCUA or, if state-chartered, the appropriate state official, of reclassification on safety and soundness grounds as provided under § 702.102(b) or § 702. 202(d).
( d ) *Notice to NCUA by filing Call Report.* ( 1 ) Other than by filing a Call Report, a federally insured credit union need not notify the NCUA Board of a change in its capital measures that places the credit union in a lower capital category;
( 2 ) Failure to timely file a Call Report as required under this section in no way alters the effective date of a change in capital classification under paragraph (b) of this section, or the affected credit union's corresponding legal obligations under this part.
[80 FR 66706, Oct. 29, 2015, as amended at 86 FR 72804, Dec. 23, 2021]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2636-2637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1033]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Center for Mental Health Services; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) National 
Advisory Council in January 2000.
    All of this meeting will be open and will include a roll call, 
general announcements and a discussion of the mental health systems in 
Australia and New Zealand, school violence prevention program 
activities, consumer affairs, and Mental Health: A Report of

[[Page 2637]]

the Surgeon General. Public comments are welcome. Please communicate 
with the individual listed as contact below for guidance. If anyone 
needs special accommodations for persons with disabilities please 
notify the contact listed below.
    A summary of the meeting and a roster of Council members may be 
obtained from Ms. Patricia Gratton, Committee Management Officer, CMHS, 
Room 11C-26, Parklawn Building, Rockville, Maryland 20857, telephone 
(301) 443-7987.
    Committee Name: CMHS National Advisory Council.
    Meeting Dates: January 20-21, 2000.
    Place(s): The DoubleTree Hotel (1/20/2000), 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Hilton Washington and Towers (1/21/2000), 1919 Connecticut Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20009.
    Open: January 20, 9:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
    Open: January 21, 9:00 a.m.-Adjournment.
    Contact: Eileen S. Pensinger, Room 17C-27, Parklawn Building, 
Telephone: (301) 443-4823 and FAX (301) 443-4865.

    Dated: January 11, 2000.
S.E. Stephens,
Acting Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health, 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-1033 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-U
#### § 617.7525 May FCA use other enforcement actions?

FCA may issue a distressed loan restructuring directive in addition to, or instead of, any other action allowed by law, including cease and desist proceedings, civil money penalties, or the granting or conditioning of any application or other requests by the System institution.
§ 617.7620 What should the System institution do when it decides to sell acquired agricultural real estate at a public auction? System institutions electing to sell or lease acquired agricultural real estate or a portion of it through a public auction, competitive bidding process, or other similar public offering must: ( a ) Notify the previous owner, by certified mail, of the availability of such property. The notice must contain the minimum amount, if any, required to qualify a bid as acceptable to the institution and any terms or conditions to which such sale or lease will be subject;
( b ) Accept the offer by the previous owner if the System institution receives two or more qualified bids in the same amount, the bids are the highest received, and one of the qualified bids is from the previous owner; and
( c ) Not discriminate against a previous owner in these proceedings.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23455 Filed:01/31/23 Entered:02/02/23 10:03:46 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23455 Filed:01/31/23 Entered:02/02/23 10:03:46 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23455 Filed:01/31/23 Entered:02/02/23 10:03:46 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23455 Filed:01/31/23 Entered:02/02/23 10:03:46 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23455 Filed:01/31/23 Entered:02/02/23 10:03:46 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q (the "the  Report")  of
Clearfield, Inc. a Minnesota corporation. (the "Company"), for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the  "Report"),  the undersigned  officer of the Company  certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, that, to her knowledge

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly represents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



February 9, 2009       /s/ Cheryl Beranek Podzimek
                       ---------------------------------------------------------
                       By: Cheryl Beranek Podzimek, President and CEO
                       (Principal Executive Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)


                                       18
#### § 410.140 Employment.

No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
Order filed November 20, 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00533

- CV

____________ JASON D. KRAUS , Appellant

V. TZACHAR HARARI, Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 70930



### O R D E R
The parties notified this court on August 9, 2012 that the case had settled. As of today’s date the parties have not filed a dispositive motion.
Unless appellant submits a brief, or the parties submit a dispo sitive motion to the
clerk of this court on or before December 20, 2012 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
#### JABEZ BRAINARD *v.*LIVIA BRAINARD.

Divorce — hearsay—admissions of the parties.

. Hearsay evidence is not sufficient in divorce.

The statute prohibits the decreeing a divorce on the declarations or admissions of the parties.

Divorce. Cause, three years wilful absence.

The parties were married in 1812. She left in 1823, with his consent and went without him to Connecticut, to stay there awhile. He was to go for her. He was absent some time the next season and said he went for her. He was absent again five years, and it was the *general opinion*he went to work out and bring her back. She said to a witness, who saw her in Connecticut three years ago, that she did not care about her husband, nor intend to live with him.

By the Court.

There is no evidence here but hearsay and the declarations of the parties, which the law expressly prohibits us from considering. As to the absence, it appears she left with her husband’s consent.
§ 624.3 Initial margin. ( a ) *Collection of margin.* A covered swap entity shall collect initial margin with respect to any non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based swap from a counterparty that is a financial end user with material swaps exposure or that is a swap entity in an amount that is no less than the greater of: ( 1 ) Zero; or
( 2 ) The initial margin collection amount for such non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based swap *less* the initial margin threshold amount (not including any portion of the initial margin threshold amount already applied by the covered swap entity or its affiliates to other non-cleared swaps or non-cleared security-based swaps with the counterparty or its affiliates), as applicable.
( b ) *Posting of margin.* A covered swap entity shall post initial margin with respect to any non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based swap to a counterparty that is a financial end user with material swaps exposure. Such initial margin shall be in an amount at least as large as the covered swap entity would be required to collect under paragraph (a) of this section if it were in the place of the counterparty.
( c ) *Timing.* A covered swap entity shall comply with the initial margin requirements described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section on each business day, for a period beginning on or before the business day following the day of execution and ending on the date the non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based swap terminates or expires.
( d ) *Other counterparties.* A covered swap entity is not required to collect or post initial margin with respect to any non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based swap described in § 624.1(d). For any other non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based swap between a covered swap entity and a counterparty that is neither a financial end user with a material swaps exposure nor a swap entity, the covered swap entity shall collect initial margin at such times and in such forms and such amounts (if any), that the covered swap entity determines appropriately addresses the credit risk posed by the counterparty and the risks of such non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based swap.
AFS

- 14

- 021

- E January 6, 2014

Exemption No. 10411 A Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2001

- 8 7 50

Mr. Estel Breeding, Jr. Associate Dean, Academic programs and

Co

- Chair, JSAMTCC Community College of the A ir Force

100 South Turner Boulevard

Maxwell

- Gunter AFB, AL 36114

Dear Mr. Breeding :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption

No. 10411 . It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Ba sis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 8, 2013 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

on behalf of Community College of the Air Force (CCAF) for an extension of Exemption

No. 10411 . That exemption from § 147.31(c)(2)(iii) of Titl e 14, Code of Federal Regulations

allows CCAF to permit U.S. Air Force aviation maintenance technicians who have completed military aviation maintenance training courses to be evaluated using the same criteria used for

the civilian sector.

In your petitio n, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the p etition

in the Federal Register

. T he reque sted extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be det rimental to CCAF

.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for th e issuance of Exe mption No. 10411

, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator hasAFS

- 14

- 021

- E 2

delegat ed to me, I grant your petition, from § 147. 31(c)(2)(iii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allowing CCAF to permit U.S. Air Force aviation maintenance technicians who have completed military aviation maintenance training courses to be evaluated using the same

criteria used for the civilian s ector.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termin ation date of Exemption No. 10411

, to February 28, 2016

, unless so oner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service
Turner Lett League ofConservation Voters Policy and Lobbying william lott@lcv.org 601-665-7471 My name is Turner Lett and Iappreciatethis opportunitytodayto speak in support of the Environmental Protection Agency's standards limiting carbon pollution from power plants.

As a Mississippi native, Iwitnessed firsthand one ofthe most destructive storms to hit the United States: Hurricane Katrina. On the morning ofAugust 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina pummeled the Mississippi Gulfand broughtwith it a massive storm surge that completelyflooded buildings and homes and lefttoo many stranded and in need of assistance. Katrina's storm surge was the highest ever recorded on the U.S. Coast- 27.8 feet at Pass Christian, Mississippi. In its wake, Katrina damaged some 90,000 square miles and tookthe lives of2,000 people- people who had never witnessed and did not anticipate a storm so powerful. Many describe Katrina as a natural disaster- a product of naturethat is completely unaffected by our actions. However, I know that operating underthe assumption that we play no part in increasingthe severity ofstorms and other disasters will onlyfurther harm, not help us. It will not cause disastersto occur more infrequently; itwill not decrease their potency; and itwill not help save lives ofAmericans.

As Ispeak, people are coping with climate change's impact- prolonged heat waves, more severe droughtsthat lead to extended wildfire seasons, and rises in sea level that threaten to inundate coastal cities and ecosystems.These disasters cannot go unnoticed. Rhetoric that does not acknowledge our contribution to climate change only engenders inaction. And inaction on climate change will provetoo costly. Fortunately, the EPA is fully aware that climate change is occurring and human actions are the main cause. The new proposed standard seeks to cut carbon pollution from its primary source: power plants. Coal and gas-fired power plants are the single largest source ofcarbon pollution in the United States- accountingfor roughly 40% ofannual global warming emissions. That is why reducing power plant emissions is essential in heralding acleaner, healthier environment. And EPA's new rule to limit power plants' carbon pollution is the biggest step our country has taken to reverse climate change's harmful trend.
Climate change is the most pressing problem our nation faces, and Icommend the work EPA has done and continuesto do to nurture a cleaner, safer, and healthier planet. Now we mustturnto our representatives in Congress and to ourstate leadersto ease this critical transition to a cleaner energy policy. I hopethey support EPA's plan without any objections and seekto implementthe plan tothe best oftheir ability- for it is what is best for our environment, our economy, and ourwellbeing.

Thank you.