alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM,

OCTOBER, 1900.

#### Otto J. Bueb, Respondent, *v.*Annie M. Geraty et al., Appellants.

Appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming a judgment of the Trial Term, rendered on the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff.

Action in replevin.

Edmund T. Oldham (John E. Couch, of counsel), for appellants.

Edwin F. Stern, for respondent.

*721
      *Per Curiam.*

This case was considered by a former Appellate Term (28 Misc. Rep. 134), and hence it is only necessary to set forth such facts as were not before the court upon the previous trial.

Upon the former appeal the plaintiff’s contention that his indorsement of the note was made in consequence of a contemporaneous oral agreement of Geraty & Ball to execute'the chattel mortgage in suit, was held not to be supported by the evidence. The plaintiff, however, upon the trial which is the present subject of review, introduced evidence tending to show that such agreement was made. This version, though, was contradicted by the defendants, and the case was submitted to the jury upon the theory that the plaintiff might prevail in the action, notwithstanding failure to prove the existence of his mortgage by virtue of an agreement, if the Connery mortgage should be found to have been given without valuable consideration. This submission of the issues was quite at variance with the rule laid down upon the former appeal (28 Misc. Rep. 138), and the error, presented as it is by proper exception, must lead to a reversal of the judgment.

For these reasons the judgment must he reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.
#### Commonwealth ex rel. Zarozny v. Dennison

*Theodore C. Zarozny,*p. p., for relator.

*Charles L. Durham*and *Juanita Kidd Stout,*Assistant District Attorneys, *James N. Lafferty,*First Assistant District Attorney, and *Victor H. Blanc,*District Attorney, contra.

February 7, 1958.

Reimel, J.,

This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Relator was convicted of fraudulent conversion and sentenced to imprisonment in the Eastern State Penitentiary for a period of from two and a half to five years.

In a prior petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed January 7, 1957, as of Court of Common Pleas No. 5, December term, 1956, no. 3391, President Judge Bok, in an opinion dated March 15, 1957, held that the sentence should have been to the county prison since the offense carries only simple imprisonment. At that time relator also urged that since he was erroneously sentenced and confined in the penitentiary, and since imprisonment in the penitentiary is considered more onerous than imprisonment in the county prison, a formula of two to one, or two and a half to one should be applied, and he should therefore receive multiple day credits for every day erroneously confined. Presi*739dent Judge Bok disposed of this contention on the merits-and denied any change in the duration of sentence based upon said grounds. No appeal was taken from this ruling.

The present petition is merely repetitious. No new contention is advanced. Matters which have been adjudicated in one habeas corpus proceeding may not be reexamined in a subsequent proceeding: Commonwealth ex rel. Herge v. Martin, 387 Pa. 117; Commonwealth ex rel. Allen v. Claudy, 170 Pa. Superior Ct. 499. Moreover, the courts have repeatedly held that a petition for a writ of habeas corpus which is repetitious of a previous petition should be dismissed, for a second petition cannot be employed as a device to secure subsequent appellate review of adjudicated matters from which a timely appeal could have been taken: Commonwealth ex rel. Henrickson v. Hendrick, 181 Pa. Superior Ct. 45; Commonwealth ex rel. Allen v. Claudy, supra. Accordingly, relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

----------------------------------------------------------x 

In re: PROMESA 

 Title III 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered) 

et al., 

 Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x 

PRO SE NOTICES OF PARTICIPATION RECEIVED BY THE COURT 

(DISCOVERY FOR CONFIRMATION OF COMMONWEALTH PLAN OF ADJUSTMENT) 

The attached additional pro se Notices of Intent to Participate in Discovery 

Concerning Confirmation of Commonwealth Plan of Adjustment have been received by the Court 

on February 2, 2022 for filing in the above-captioned cases pursuant to the Order Establishing 

Preliminary Confirmation Submission and Discovery Procedures and Directing Notice to 

Creditors of the Same (Docket Entry No. 17431 in Case No. 17-3283). 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “Commonwealth”) (Bankruptcy 

Case No. 17-BK-3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico 

Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3284-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation 

Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3566-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747); and 

(vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK-5523-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case numbers are listed as 

Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:20015 Filed:02/03/22 Entered:02/03/22 11:29:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Pro Se Notices of Participation Received by the Court (Discovery – Confirmation Plan) 

February 3, 2022 

 2 

1. Vanessa Rodriguez Rubio 

Dated: February 3, 2022 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:20015 Filed:02/03/22 Entered:02/03/22 11:29:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Set: 1:30 PM (AST)

Started: 2:08 PM (AST)

Ended: 3:34 PM (AST) 

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE HONORABLE JUDITH GAIL DEIN DATE December 14, 2017

COURTROOM DEPUTY: Thomas Quinn / Carmen Tacoronte

COURT REPORTER: Joan Daly (MA)

Motion Hearing held. 

• Urgent Renewed Joint Motion by the Ad Hoc Group of General Obligation Bondholders, Ambac 

Assurance Corporation, Assured Guaranty Corp., Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp., The Mutual 

Fund Group, and National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation for Order Authorizing Rule 

2004 Examination [Docket No. 1870].

o Motions for Joinder [Docket Nos. 1898, 1906, 1910 and 1911]

Arguments heard. 

The ruling on the 2004 motion and the motions for joinder will be limited to the seventeen (17) 

categories1 and are subject to objections as discussed today. 

On or before December 22, 2017, counsel shall file a joint proposal on the usage of the documents. 

Order(s) to follow.

s/Carmen Tacoronte

Carmen Tacoronte

Courtroom Deputy Clerk

 1 Pages 10-14 of Schedule A to Docket No. 1870. 

In Re: The Financial Oversight & Management 

Board for Puerto Rico

as representative of

3:17-BK-3283 (LTS)

(Jointly Administrated)

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al.

Debtors

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:1995 Filed:12/14/17 Entered:12/14/17 16:23:13 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3349 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 371
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3349

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 6, 2003

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of the United 
                      States for fiscal year 2004.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR FEDERAL JUSTICES AND 
              JUDGES.

    Pursuant to section 140 of Public Law 97-92, Justices and judges of 
the United States are authorized during fiscal year 2004 to receive a 
salary adjustment in accordance with section 461 of title 28, United 
States Code.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 5, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.

                                                       Calendar No. 371

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3349

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of the United 
                      States for fiscal year 2004.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 6, 2003

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6821

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FRANKIE JAY CURRY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (4:03-cr-00098-RGD; 4:07-cv-00034-RGD)

Submitted: September 26, 2007 Decided: October 12, 2007

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frankie Jay Curry, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II,

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Frankie Jay Curry seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Curry has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# Europos Sąjungos C 464A/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 464A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 64 metai2021m. lapkričio 17d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 464A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

64 metai2021m. lapkričio 17d.

---

| Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- |
| | Klaidų ištaisymas |
| 2021/C 464 A/01 | Mokslinių tyrimų ir inovacijų generalinis direktoratas. Pranešimo apie konkursą vyriausiojo patarėjo (Europos inovacijų tarybos valdybos pirmininko) pareigoms – klaidų ištaisymas (AD 14 lygio laikinasis darbuotojas) – COM/2021/10408 ( OL C 432 A, 2021 10 26 ) | 1 |

Turinys

Puslapis

Klaidų ištaisymas

2021/C 464 A/01

Mokslinių tyrimų ir inovacijų generalinis direktoratas. Pranešimo apie konkursą vyriausiojo patarėjo (Europos inovacijų tarybos valdybos pirmininko) pareigoms – klaidų ištaisymas (AD 14 lygio laikinasis darbuotojas) – COM/2021/10408 ( OL C 432 A, 2021 10 26 )

( OL C 432 A, 2021 10 26 )

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

Klaidų ištaisymas

| 2021 11 17 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 464/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2021 11 17

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 464/1

---

Mokslinių tyrimų ir inovacijų generalinis direktoratas. Pranešimo apie konkursą vyriausiojo patarėjo (Europos inovacijų tarybos valdybos pirmininko) pareigoms – klaidų ištaisymas

(AD 14 lygio laikinasis darbuotojas)

COM/2021/10408

(
  Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys C 432 A, 2021 m. spalio 26 d.
  )

(2021/C 464 A/01)

5 puslapis, „Galutinis terminas“, pirma pastraipa:

| yra: | „Galutinis registracijos terminas – 2021 m. lapkričio 26 d. 12val. Briuselio laiku; vėliau registracija negalima.“, |
| --- | --- |

yra:

„Galutinis registracijos terminas – 2021 m. lapkričio 26 d. 12val. Briuselio laiku; vėliau registracija negalima.“,

| turi būti: | „Galutinis registracijos terminas – 2021 m. gruodžio 17 d. 12 val. Briuselio laiku; vėliau registracija negalima.“ |
| --- | --- |

turi būti:

turi būti:

„Galutinis registracijos terminas – 2021 m. gruodžio 17 d. 12 val. Briuselio laiku; vėliau registracija negalima.“

---
221031 SCH ORD RE O'NEILL POC MOT VERSION OCTOBER 31, 2022 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et al.,

Debtors.1

PROMESA

Title III

Case No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING OF MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO AMEND PROOF OF CLAIM NUMBER 28744

The Court has received and reviewed the Motion for Leave to Amend Proof of 

Claim Number 28744 (Docket Entry No. 22757 in Case No. 17-3283, the “Motion”), filed by 

O’Neill Security & Consultant Services, Inc. (the “Movant”). 

Responsive papers to the Motion, if any, must be filed by November 14, 2022, 

at 5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). Movant’s reply papers must be filed by November 21, 

2022, at 5:00 p.m. (Atlantic Standard Time). The Court will thereafter take the Motion on 

submission, unless the Court determines that a hearing is necessary.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 31, 2022 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain 

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3283-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing 

Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of 

Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); 

(iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings 

Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK-5523-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software 

limitations).

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22761 Filed:10/31/22 Entered:10/31/22 13:17:33 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2413

LT Case No. 2015-CF-001104-A

_____________________________

ANTHONY MARIAROSSI,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.850 appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County.

Daniel B. Merritt, Jr., Judge.

Anthony Mariarossi, Wewahitchka, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. 

Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

October 31, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

EISNAUGLE, HARRIS, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:228
Jump to main content

# EPA

        - Contact Us

          -  Newsroom 

# GoGreen

Americans want to help protect and improve the nation's land, water, and air. "Go Green!" is a monthly newsletter from the US EPA summarizing recent news and info you can use to make a difference in your home, community, and workplace.

Sign up to receive EPA's new consumer newsletter, *GoGreen!*
**How to sign up:**

In the January 2014 issue:	Test your home for radon	Green after the holidays	2014 Fuel Economy Guide	Native American Employees	Environmental Ed Grants	Educator Award Nominations	...and more.

## More:

**Also subscribe to***Public Engagement Highlights**Science Matters*EPA Region 3 *Envirobytes*EPA Region 9 *Newsletters of the Pacific Southwest*More government newsletters, from USA.gov

**Other "what you can do"**EPA for concerned citizensPick 5 for the EnvironmentTips you can useAll EPA press releases and news announcements

Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.

## Main menu

- Learn the Issues   - Air
  - Chemicals and Toxics
  - Climate Change
  - Emergencies
  - Greener Living
  - Health and Safety
  - Land and Cleanup
  - Pesticides
  - Waste
  - Water
- Science & Technology   - Air
  - Climate Change
  - Ecosystems
  - Health
  - Land, Waste and Cleanup
  - Pesticides
  - Substances and Toxics
  - Sustainable Practices
  - Water
- Laws & Regulations   - By Business Sector
  - By Topic
  - Compliance
  - Enforcement
  - Laws and Executive Orders
  - Policy and Guidance
  - Regulations
- About EPA   - Administrator Gina McCarthy
  - Current Leadership
  - Staff Directory
  - Planning, Budget and Results
  - Jobs and Internships
  - Headquarters Offices
  - Regional Offices
  - Labs and Research Centers

## Secondary menu

- Español
- 中文: 繁體版
- 中文: 简体版
- Tiếng Việt
- 한국어

            - EPA Home
            - Privacy and Security Notice
            - Accessibility

Last updated on January 2, 2014

            - News by Email
            - Widgets
            - News Feeds
            - Podcasts
            - EPA Blog

              - Facebook
              - YouTube
              - Twitter
              - Flickr

More social media at EPA »
# Official Journal C 410/8 Oc

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 410 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 648 October 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 410

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 648 October 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 410/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 410/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 28.1
                                       ------------ 
            ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE
                 UCFC LOAN TRUST 1996-A1
                 UCFC LOAN TRUST 1996-A2
              RESERVE ACCOUNT TRUST 1996-A
                                
 
    In accordance with Section 9.16 of that certain Pooling and
 Servicing Agreement relating to UCFC Loan Trust 1996-A1, UCFC Loan
 Trust 1996-A2 and Reserve Account Trust 1996-A dated as of March 1,
 1996 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), by and among UCFC
 Acceptance Corporation, as depositor, United Companies Lending
 Corporation, as servicer (the "Servicer"), and Bankers Trust
 Company of California, N.A., as trustee, the undersigned officer
 of the Servicer does hereby certify as follows: (i) a review of
 the activities of the Servicer during 1996 and of performance
 under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under the
 undersigned officer's supervision; and (ii) to the best of such
 undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review, the
 Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling
 and Servicing Agreement for 1996.
 
    EXECUTED this 25th day of March, 1997. 
 
 
                                                                 
                        /s/ C. GERON HARGON
                        -------------------------------
                            C. Geron Hargon
                            President
                            United Companies Lending Corporation
     
                          PAGE 7
#### § 603.315 Times, places, and requirements for identification of individuals making requests.

The individual making written requests for information or records ordinarily will not be required to verify that person's identity. The signature upon such requests shall be deemed to be a certification by the requester that he or she is the individual to whom the record pertains, or the parent of a minor, or the duly appointed legal guardian of the individual to whom the record pertains. The Privacy Act Officer, however, may require such additional verification of identity in any instance in which the Privacy Act Officer deems it advisable.

[51 FR 41941, Nov. 20, 1986]