alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A2104. KANLICA v. THE STATE.

In February 2015, Tansu Kanlica pleaded guilty to two counts of homicide by

vehicle and serious injury by vehicle, and the trial court sentenced him to a 15-year

term of confinement, followed by a consecutive 5-year term of confinement for the

second homicide by vehicle and concurrent 5-year termof confinementfor the serious

injury by vehicle charge. Kanlica filed a motion for reduction of sentence, which

motion the trial court granted, on June 28, 2017.

1 Kanlica then filed a motion to

vacate a void sentence, which the trial court denied. Kanlica appeals this ruling.

A direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or correct a

void sentence only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in

fact, void.

2

“Motions to vacate a void sentence generally are limited to claims that —

even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for which the sentence was

imposed — the law does not authorize that sentence, most typically because it

exceeds the most severe punishment forwhich the applicable penalstatute provides.”

3

1 The court modified Kanlica’s sentence to a 10-year term of confinement for

count 1, a 15-year term to be served on probation for count 2 (running consecutive

to count 1), and a 15-year term to be served on probation for count 3 to be served

concurrent to count 2. 

2

 See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217, n. 1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg v.

State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). 

3

von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). 

January 28, 2020
When a sentence is within the statutory range of punishment, it is not void.

4

Kanlica argues that his ten-year sentence for the first count of homicide by

vehicle should instead be three years because that is the minimum sentence and no

aggravated factors existed in his case. Nevertheless, ten yearsfor homicide by vehicle

is a permissible sentence, and there is no statutory requirement for aggravation

implicated by the offense at issue.5 Because Kanlica’s sentence falls within the

applicable range of punishment, he has not raised a colorable void sentence claim.

Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

4

 See Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004).

5 See OCGA § 40-6-393 (a) (sentence for homicide by vehicle is “not less than

[3] nor more than 15 years”). 

01/28/2020
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Airman ALEXANDER J. SARTORIUS

United States Air Force

ACM S32203

26 November 2014

Sentence adjudged 19 December 2013 by SPCM convened at Travis Air

Force Base, California. Military Judge: Jill M. Thomas (sitting alone).

Approved Sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 30 days, and 

reduction to E-1.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Captain Thomas A. Smith.

Appellate Counsel for the United States: Major Daniel J. Breen and Gerald 

R. Bruce, Esquire.

Before

ALLRED, HECKER, and TELLER

Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is subject to editorial correction before final release.

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error 

materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occurred. Article 66(c), 

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed, 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000). 

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

STEVEN LUCAS

Clerk of the Court
§ 5.5 Filing fees. ( a ) *Procedure.* A filer must submit the appropriate filing fee, if any, in connection with its filing. Filing fees must be paid by check payable to the OCC or by other means acceptable to the OCC. Additional information on filing fees, including where to file, can be found in the Comptroller's Licensing Manual. The OCC generally does not refund the filing fees.
( b ) *Fee schedule.* The OCC publishes a fee schedule in the “Notice of Comptroller of the Currency Fees,” as described in 12 CFR 8.8.
[80 FR 28414, May 18, 2015, as amended at 85 FR 80436, Dec. 11, 2020]
Responses to first and third detailed OMB questions Bill Maxwell to: Cortney_Higgins 03/14/2011 04:51 PM

Cortney --

Here are the responses to the first and third set of detailed OMB questions.

Thank you.

Summary of Interagency Working Comments on dr aft EGU MACT under EO 12866 Interagency Review_ 03 10 2011_Response_031411.doc

Summary of Interagency Working Comments on draft EGU MACT under EO 12866 Interagency Review_ 03 04 _Response_031411.doc

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450
#### § 380.67 Qualified Financial Contracts.

The rights and obligations of any party to a qualified financial contract to which a covered broker or dealer is a party shall be governed exclusively by 12 U.S.C. 5390, including the limitations and restrictions contained in 12 U.S.C. 5390(c)(10)(B), and any regulations promulgated thereunder.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997<F1>
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         867,000 
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,502,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,549,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,676,000
<PP&E>                                       9,122,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,913,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,686,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        99,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,183,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,913,000
<SALES>                                     10,402,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,402,000
<CGS>                                       10,020,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,020,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,479,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             224,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,279,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (119,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,160,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  25,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,135,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
<FN>
<F1><Period Start> and <Period End> reflect only the quarter ended 12/31/96 since
comparable balance sheets are included for 3/31/96, while the Statement of
Operations compares disparate quarters for the current and includes pro forma
presentation for the prior year.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### JOHNSON *v.*JOHNSON’S ADMINISTRATORS.

Tower to receive money — revoked by death — administrators—payment without authority — * setoff.

A power to receive money and pay it over for another, is revoked by the death of the party to whom it is given — it does not pass to his administrators.

If the administrators in such case collect, the amount is money of the party in their hands; and if they have paid it out without authority, it is no defence at law, although paid in the ' way the intestate was to have paid it. If by the payment, the administrators acquired a right to recover against the plaintiff, they should have relied upon the setoff, notthe general issue.

Assumpsit for money had and received. The general issue joined. It appeared in evidence that sundry promissory notes were placed in the hands of the intestate to receive the amount and pay it out to others, and that after his death the administrators had collected the money, and paid it out accordingly.

*Van Matre,*for the plaintiff,

claimed to recover the amount received, notwithstanding it had been applied according to the agreement, because there is no matter of setoff, and the defence is not admissible under the general issue.

*Fox*j contra.

Lane, J.

The intestate received the notes to collect the amount and pay over to others, but before this was done he died. The authority to collect, became inoperative by the death of the person receiving it. The right to act under the power did not pass to his administrator. As the case is without any evidence of interest in the intestate, and as the defendants acting as his administrators, have received the money of the plaintiff, and have paid it out to others without authority, the payment is a nullity, and does not discharge their liability. If by such payment, the defendants have acquired a right of the plaintiff, upon which they might sue, that is a proper subject of setoff, not of defence, under the general issue. The law arising on the case, as it stands, is with the plaintiff.

Judgment for the plaintiff.
#### PASQUALE ROMANO, APPELLANT, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, RESPONDENT.

Submitted February 16, 1940

Decided April 18, 1940.

For the appellant, *Kanter & Kanter (Elias A. Kanter).*

For the respondent, *Milton B. Konvitz*and *Frank H. Sommer.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chief Justice, Case, Donges, Heher, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 10.

*For reversal*— None.
Exhibit
32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Theragenics Corporation ® , (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bruce
W. Smith, Acting Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the
    Report.
 
 
 By: /s/
Bruce W. Smith
 Bruce W.
Smith
 Acting
Chief Financial Officer
 May 13,
2005
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Theragenics Corporation ® and will
be retained by Theragenics Corporation ® and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3308

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to convert the dairy forward 

pricing program into a permanent program of the Department of Agriculture. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16, 2003

Mr. DOOLEY of California (for himself, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. 

OSE, Mr. JANKLOW, Mr. RUSH, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. KIRK, Mr. 

MANZULLO, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. FORD, Mr. 

RODRIGUEZ, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. KIND, and Mr. PETRI) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to convert the 

dairy forward pricing program into a permanent program 

of the Department of Agriculture.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT DAIRY FORWARD PRICING PRO4 GRAM. 

5 Section 23 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 

6 U.S.C. 627), reenacted with amendments by the Agricul7 tural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, is amended—
2

•HR 3308 IH 

1 (1) in the section heading, by striking 

2 ‘‘PILOT’’; 

3 (2) in subsection (a)—

4 (A) in the subsection heading, by striking 

5 ‘‘PILOT’’; and 

6 (B) by striking ‘‘Not later than’’ and all 

7 that follows through ‘‘temporary pilot program’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘The Secretary of Agriculture 

9 shall conduct, as a permanent program of the 

10 Department of Agriculture, a program’’; 

11 (3) in subsection (c)—

12 (A) in the subsection heading, by striking 

13 ‘‘PILOT’’; and 

14 (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘pilot’’; 

15 and 

16 (4) by striking subsections (d) and (e).

Æ
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23086 Filed:12/16/22 Entered:12/16/22 15:07:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23086 Filed:12/16/22 Entered:12/16/22 15:07:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23086 Filed:12/16/22 Entered:12/16/22 15:07:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; SM17 PAR09-066 PCCTR U19 applications.                    

*Date:*                         November 5-6, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         5 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate cooperative agreement applications.                    

*Place:*                         Courtyard Marriott Washingtonian Center, 204 Boardwalk Place, Gaithersburg, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Martina Schmidt, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Complementary, & Alternative Medicine, NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3456,                         *schmidma@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 9, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-24978 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,158,460
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,399,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,620,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,376,467
<PP&E>                                         651,114
<DEPRECIATION>                                 340,453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,892,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,762,590
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        125
<COMMON>                                           533
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,012,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,892,846
<SALES>                                      8,432,184
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,432,184
<CGS>                                        5,100,344
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,813,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,916,691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,636,209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,035,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,937
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,037,969)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,037,969)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3249 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3249

     To extend the term of the Forest Counties Payments Committee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 3, 2003

   Mr. Walden of Oregon (for himself and Mr. DeFazio) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources, and 
    in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the term of the Forest Counties Payments Committee.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TERM OF FOREST COUNTIES PAYMENTS COMMITTEE.

    Effective as of October 11, 2003, section 320(e) of the Department 
of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001 (Public 
Law 106-291; 114 Stat. 994; 16 U.S.C. 500 note), is amended by striking 
``three years after the date of the enactment of this Act'' and 
inserting ``on September 30, 2007''.
                                 <all>
```
4

EXHIBIT A

PROPOSED ORDER

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22835-1 Filed:11/10/22 Entered:11/10/22 10:32:47 Desc:

Proposed Order Authorizing Joinder Page 1 of 2
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

PROMESA

Title III

No. 17 BK 3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER AUTHORIZING JOINDER

On November 4, 2022, R&D Master Enterprises, Inc., a creditor of the Commonwealth of 

Puerto Rico (the “Movant”), filed a motion requesting the entry of an order providing to join 

relator Carlos Lamoutte in the disqualification pleadings which are the subject matter of Doc. 

Nos. 20,873, 20,923, 20,946, 20,989, 20,959, 21,094, 21,096, 21,124, 21,485, 21,572, 21,604, 

21,854, 21,925, 21,938, 21,970, 21,975, 21,989, 21,990, 22,020, 22,025, 22,035, 22,090, 

22,146, 22,216, 22,232, 22,320, 22,401, 22,404, 22,419, 22,468, 22,485, 22,487, 22,756, 

22,779, and 22,800 (the “Motion for Joinder”).

The Motion for Joinder is hereby granted. To the extent that the subject matter of Movant’s

Motion for Joinder has been fully briefed and is sub judice, the Movant is hereby instructed by 

the Court that it may not file any additional motions or document following the granting of this 

Order by the Court.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: November ____, 2022

_________________________________

 Laura Taylor Swain

United States District Judge

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO 

RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO 

RICO, et al.,

Debtors.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22835-1 Filed:11/10/22 Entered:11/10/22 10:32:47 Desc:

Proposed Order Authorizing Joinder Page 2 of 2
#### JOHN J. TOOHEY, Jr., COMMISSIONER OF LABOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. ABROMOWITZ DEPARTMENT STORE, INC., DEFENDANT.

Submitted January 16, 1940

Decided February 23, 1940.

Before Justices Bodine and Perskie.

For the plaintiff, *David T. Wilentz.*

For the defendant, *William J. Blair.*

Bodine, J.

The sole question in this case is the meaning of *R. S.*34:2-24 as follows: “No female shall be employed or permitted to work in any manufacturing or mercantile establishment, bakery, laundry or restaurant more than ten hours in any one day or more than six days, or fifty-four hours in any one week.”

The charge made by the Commissioner of Labor, which was dismissed in the Court of Common Pleas of Ocean county, was that in defendant’s mercantile establishment it did employ Alice Stevenson, a female, more than six days in any one week, to wit, seven days, contrary to and in violation of said section 34:2-24 of the Eevised Statutes, whereby said defendant incurred the penalty of $50 pursuant to section 34:2-27 of the Eevised Statutes.

It seems to have been the view of the court that the statute did not forbid seven days work if, in all, the employment was for not more than fifty-four hours in any one week.

*210The prosecutor contends, and we think rightly, that the statute forbids in the employment mentioned female labor for more than ten hours in any one day. Public policy requires that there should be control over the hours of work in certain occupations. The public interest is not served by the physical injury resulting from labor too long continued. The statute further forbids more than six days labor in any one week. This has been regarded as good practice for men qs well as women from the earliest time. The last provision forbidding more than fifty-four hours labor in any one week is like the others a separate offense. The words, as used by the legislature, are clear and unambiguous.

The judgment in the Court of Common Pleas will be set aside, but without costs.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22651-1 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/20/22 18:17:47 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 1