alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Lou
Persico, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DATASCENSION INC.





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;





5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize,
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.




Dated:
      May 19, 2009/s/
      Lou PersicoLou
      PersicoPresident
      and CEO and Principal Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, John Hanna, Chief Executive Officer of The Fashion House Holdings, Inc., (the “Company”),certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Fashion House Holdings, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        *Date: March 24, 2006* */s/John Hanna*          *By: John Hanna*   *Chief Executive Officer*
### NUMBER 13

- 17

- 00638

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

JO LEIGH ARES

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 40 4th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.



## ORDER TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF

Before Justices Rodriguez, Longoria, and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant's first unopposed motion for extension

of time to file the brief. Appellant ’ s brief was originally due to be filed on J anuary 10

,

2018

. Appellant is requesting until February 12, 2018 , to file the appellate brief in this

cause.2

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant's first unopposed

motion for extensio n of time to file the brief, is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice,

appellant's motion for extension of time to file the brief should be granted with order.

Appellant's first motion for extension of time to f ile the brief is hereby

granted a nd counsel for appellant is hereby ORDERED to file the appellate brief

with this Court on or before February 12, 2018

. Further motions for extension of

time will not be favorably entertained by the Court.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed t he

8 th day of January , 20 18

.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23296 Filed:01/18/23 Entered:01/20/23 14:20:30 Desc: MainDocument Page 1 of 2Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:23296 Filed:01/18/23 Entered:01/20/23 14:20:30 Desc: MainDocument Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7898

ISRAEL HIDALGO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DAN DOVE, Warden

Federal Correctional Institution Edgefield,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-02-2242)

Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 5, 2003

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Israel Hidalgo, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Israel Hidalgo, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hidalgo

v. United States, No. CA-02-2242 (D.S.C. Nov. 21, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 608.809 Right to agency review. ( a ) If the debtor disputes the claim, the debtor may request a review of the FCA's determination of the existence of the debt or of the amount of the debt. If only part of the claim is disputed, the undisputed portion should be paid by the payment due date.
( b ) To obtain a review, the debtor shall submit a written request for review to the FCA official named in the initial demand letter, within 15 calendar days after receipt of the letter. The debtor's request for review shall state the basis on which the claim is disputed.
( c ) The FCA shall promptly notify the debtor, in writing, that the FCA has received the request for review. The FCA shall conduct its review of the claim in accordance with § 608.810.
( d ) Upon completion of its review of the claim, the FCA shall notify the debtor whether the FCA's determination of the existence or amount of the debt has been sustained, amended, or canceled. The notification shall include a copy of the written decision issued by the hearing official pursuant to § 608.810(e). If the FCA's determination is sustained, this notification shall contain a provision which states that the FCA intends to collect the debt by all legally available means, which may include initiating legal action against the debtor, referring the debt to a collection agency for collection, collecting the debt by offset, or asking other Federal agencies for assistance in collecting the debt by offset.
§ 341.5 Withdrawal from registration. ( a ) *Notice of withdrawal from registration.* Any transfer agent registered under this part that ceases to engage in the functions of a transfer agent as defined in § 341.2(a) shall file a written notice of withdrawal from registration with the FDIC. A registered transfer agent that ceases to engage in one or more of the functions of transfer agent as defined in § 341.2(a), but continues to engage in another such function, shall not withdraw from registration.
( b ) A notice of withdrawal shall be filed with the FDIC at its Washington, DC headquarters. Deregistration shall be effective upon receipt of notice of withdrawal by the FDIC. A Request for Deregistration form is available electronically from *www.fdic.gov* or by request from the Director, Division of Risk Management Supervision (RMS), FDIC, Washington, DC 20429.
( c ) If the FDIC finds that any registered transfer agent for which it is the ARA, is no longer in existence or has ceased to do business as a transfer agent, FDIC shall cancel or deny the registration by order of the Board of Directors.
( d ) Registration of a transfer agent with another ARA shall cancel registration of the transfer agent with FDIC.
[47 FR 38106, Aug. 30, 1982, as amended at 60 FR 31384, June 15, 1995; 81 FR 27297, May 6, 2016]
EXHIBIT 23.01

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Delta and Pine Land Company:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-21049, 333-74168, 333-123621 and 333-132985) on Form S-8 of Delta and
Pine Land Company of our reports dated November 13, 2006, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Delta and Pine Land Company and subsidiaries as
of August 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31, 2006, and the
related financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2006
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of August
31, 2006, which reports appear in the August 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Delta and Pine Land Company.

Our reports dated November 13, 2006 contain an explanatory paragraph stating
that the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, effective September 1, 2005.

                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

Memphis, Tennessee
November 13, 2006
#### § 630.1 Purpose.

This part sets forth the requirements for preparation and publication by the Farm Credit System (FCS or System) of annual and quarterly reports to investors and potential investors in Systemwide and consolidated bank debt obligations of the System and to other users of the reports in the general public.
|   | (1)                            The Report fully complies with the requirements of section                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)                            The information contained in the Report fairly presents,                  in all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                  of                  Buckeye. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated                  this 26th                  day of August, 2008 |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                  |   |
|                                                                  |   |
| /s/                  Steven G.                  Dean                  |   |
| Steven                  G. Dean                                       |   |
| Senior                  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    |   |
From: "Terry Schimmel (Bricks - Phenix City)" <Terry.Schimmel@boral.com>

Sent: 08/13/2008 05:28 PM

To: Jeff Telander/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc:

Subject: Boral MACT ICR

Jeff,

Attached please find an electronic copy of Boral’s completed ICR. Please note that the facility HAP 

classifications listed on FORM A are based on their current status. We will likely be reviewing the status 

of each facility in the coming years.

You will note that two of our facilities were not operated last year These idled kilns remain functional 

and will be restarted when warranted. In addition, many of our kilns were not operated the entire year 

of 2007. I wish business conditions were better as so far it looks like our capacity utilization for 2008 is 

shaping up to be worse than 2007. Projections into the future look like several more years of hard times 

with expectation that demand may never get back to 2006 levels.

While year-round operation is typical for our industry, we have been impacted by the tough economic 

conditions of the past few years- and expect that this will continue for some time. This non-continuous 

operation obviously increases the cost of the control per ton of bricks produced, while also reducing the 

total profit that our company makes. We are interested in working with you and your economics lead 

(Tom Walton) to ensure that these conditions are included in your assessment of the impacts of any

future rulemaking.

The non-continuous operation of our kilns and associated controls also creates additional maintenance 

and operating burdens. These additional activities are needed to ensure that the lime/limestone in our 

control devices are not permanently corrupted as the temperature within the chamber drops- and 

moisture from the atmosphere is introduced.

The throughputs/capacities listed on FORM B are based on yearly average throughputs. As we discussed 

during the site visits, the "capacity" of a brick kiln is not generally a stagnant number. We believe that 

you should not consider the "9.9" tph capacities when evaluating the control level at various sizes. These 

limits are not attributable to anything except the now vacated MACT. We are submitting FORM F under 

the CBI procedures you outlined. We are also mailing you the test reports listed via FedEx.

Please feel free to call me regarding the information on this submission or anything we may have 

missed. It’s a pretty big task to complete this thing with as many plants as we have and I’m sure we may 

have missed something. Also in my capacity as the MACT Task Force lead person just let me know when 

and how we can help you all in ciphering through some of this information. Some of the questions have 

required some interpretation and everyone may not have understood what was being asked quite the 

same.

We look forward to working with you and all your people on the rule making.

Thanks,

Terry

(See attached file: Brick ICR- Boral- FINAL.xls)
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/23

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3178

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to prohibit 

interference by certain grant recipients with a student’s treatment of 

his or her diabetes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2003

Mr. HINOJOSA (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Ms. JACKSONLEE of Texas, Mr. BELL, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. REYES, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. 

DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. GORDON, Mr. 

MCNULTY, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. 

OWENS, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. BACA, Mr. 

BECERRA, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. PASTOR, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. 

RODRIGUEZ, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Ms. LORETTA

SANCHEZ of California, Ms. SOLIS, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, 

Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. ETHERIDGE, Mr. CLAY, Mr. BALLANCE, Ms. 

SLAUGHTER, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. FOSSELLA, Ms. WATERS, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of 

Texas, and Mr. NETHERCUTT) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to prohibit interference by certain grant recipients with a student’s treatment of his or her diabetes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3178 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health and Education 

3 Access for Students with Diabetes Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST INTERFERENCE WITH STU5 DENT TREATMENT OF DIABETES. 

6 Subpart 4 of part A of title IV of the Elementary 

7 and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7161 

8 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 4156. PROHIBITION AGAINST INTERFERENCE WITH 

10 STUDENT TREATMENT OF DIABETES. 

11 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—A State or public or private en12 tity may not receive any funds under this part unless the 

13 State or entity has in effect a policy against hindering or 

14 restricting any student from engaging in treatment of the 

15 student’s diabetes, if the treatment has been prescribed 

16 or recommended by a physician. 

17 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.— For purposes of this section: 

18 ‘‘(1) The term ‘State’ means each of the 50 

19 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth 

20 of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the United 

21 States Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the 

22 Northern Mariana Islands. 

23 ‘‘(2) The term ‘treatment’ includes the use of 

24 any prescription or over-the-counter drug, device, or 

25 biological product (including insulin pumps, 

26 glucagon injections, insulin syringes, insulin pens, 
3

•HR 3178 IH 

1 blood glucose monitors, and blood glucose moni2 toring supplies), designed for use in managing diabe3 tes and approved under section 505 of the Federal 

4 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355) or 

5 section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 262), as applicable.’’.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 702
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 702 appear at 84 FR 1606, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 702.401 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Subordinated Debt.* This subpart sets forth the requirements applicable to all Subordinated Debt issued by a federally insured, natural person credit union, including the NCUA's review and approval of that credit union's application to issue or prepay Subordinated Debt. This subpart shall apply to a federally insured, state-chartered credit union only to the extent that such federally insured, state-chartered credit union is permitted by applicable state law to issue debt instruments of the type described in this subpart. To the extent that such state law is more restrictive than this subpart with respect to the issuance of such debt instruments, that state law shall apply. Except as provided in the next sentence, any secondary capital, as that term is used in the Federal Credit Union Act, issued after January 1, 2022, is Subordinated Debt and subject to the requirements of this subpart. Issuances of secondary capital, as that term is used in the Federal Credit Union Act, to the U.S. Government or any of its subdivisions, under applications approved before January 1, 2022, pursuant to § 701.34 or § 741.204(c) of this chapter, are not subject to the requirements applicable to Subordinated Debt, discussed elsewhere in this subpart, irrespective of the date of issuance.
( b ) *Grandfathered Secondary Capital.* Any secondary capital defined as “Grandfathered Secondary Capital” under § 702.402, is governed by § 702.414. Grandfathered Secondary Capital will no longer be treated as Regulatory Capital as of the later of 30 years from the date of issuance or January 1, 2052.
[86 FR 72809, Dec. 23, 2021, as amended at 88 FR 18010, Mar. 27, 2023]