alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SARAH WYATT v. JOSEPH WYATT.

Divorce — wilful absence — alimony—custody of child.

Wilful absence for more than three years, is cause for a divorce and alimony.

Divorce. Cause — wilful absence.

These parties were married in Muskingum, about twelve years ago. After living together for some time, he left her, and after the lapse of a number of months, sent for her to come to him at Cincinnati. She went, and lived with him there about a year: he then sent her back to her father, with word that he would be up himself in a short time, but did not go for a number of months. When he did go, he staid only a short time, and left her again, and has been absent ever since, six or eight years, without in any way providing for, or corresponding with her. The last summer he was up from *150New Orleans, and may have seen her, but had no intez’course with her. There is one child.

By the Court.

Draw a decree for a divorce. Give her the custody of the child, and order him to pay her $200 for alimony, and the costs, in sixty days, and in default, give her leave to issue execution.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3464

To amend the Social Security Act to provide for coverage under the Medicare 

Program of audiologic rehabilitation services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 6, 2003

Mr. INSLEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways 

and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend the Social Security Act to provide for coverage 

under the Medicare Program of audiologic rehabilitation 

services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Audiologic 

5 Rehabilitation Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 3464 IH 

1 SEC. 2. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF AUDIOLOGIC REHABILI2 TATION SERVICES. 

3 (a) EXPANSION OF AUDIOLOGY SERVICES.—Section 

4 1861(ll)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1395x(ll)(2)) is amended by inserting ‘‘and such rehabili6 tation and treatment services’’ after ‘‘hearing and balance 

7 assessment services’’. 

8 (b) CONFORMING COVERAGE AMENDMENTS.—

9 (1) COVERAGE.—Section 1861(s)(2) of the So10 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)) is amend11 ed—

12 (A) in subparagraph (U), by striking 

13 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

14 (B) in subparagraph (V) by inserting 

15 ‘‘and’’ at the end; and 

16 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

17 subparagraph: 

18 ‘‘(W) audiology services (as defined in sub19 section (ll)(2));’’. 

20 (2) PAYMENT.—Section 1848(j)(3) of such Act 

21 (42 U.S.C. 1395w–4(j)(3)) is amended by inserting 

22 ‘‘(2)(W),’’ after ‘‘(2)(S),’’. 

23 (3) EXCEPTION FROM CURRENT EXCLUSION

24 FOR HEARING AID EXAMINATIONS.—Section 

25 1862(a)(7) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(a)(7)) is 

26 amended by inserting after ‘‘hearing aids or exami-
3

•HR 3464 IH 

1 nations therefor’’ the following: ‘‘(other than reha2 bilitation and treatment services described in section 

3 1861(ll)(2) whether furnished by an audiologist or a 

4 physician)’’. 

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall apply to services furnished on or after 

7 January 1, 2004.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3454 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3454

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 11805 Chimney Rock Road in Houston, Texas, as the ``Lee P. Brown 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 6, 2003

   Mr. Bell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 11805 Chimney Rock Road in Houston, Texas, as the ``Lee P. Brown 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEE P. BROWN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11805 Chimney Rock Road in Houston, Texas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lee P. Brown Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Lee P. Brown 
Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
#### Clifford W. CARRIER, Appellant, v. Edward W. MURRAY, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 83-6039.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Oct. 3, 1986.

Before WINTER, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, ERVIN, CHAPMAN, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court has reversed the en banc judgment of this court, as set forth in *Carrier v. Hutto,*754 F.2d 520 (4th Cir. 1985), and remanded the cause to this court for further proceedings in conformity with its opinion therein. *Murray v. Carrier,*— U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 2639, 91 L.Ed.2d 397 (1986). Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for examination of the victim’s statements in order to determine whether there may be merit to Carrier’s habeas corpus petition.

REMANDED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meetings during the week of April 24, 2000.

Commissioner Carey, as duty officer, determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible.

An open meeting will held on Tuesday, April 25, 2000 at 10 a.m. in Room 1C30.

The subject matter of the open meeting scheduled for Tuesday, April 25, 2000 at 10:00 a.m. will be: The Commission will consider issuance of an interpretive release providing guidance on the application of the federal securities laws to electronic media, including updating previous guidance on the use of electronic media to deliver documents under the federal securities laws and related matters. For further information, please contact P.J. Himelfarb or Mark A. Borges at (202) 942-2900.

A closed meeting will be held on Thursday April 27, 2000 at 11:00 a.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (8), (9)(A) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(4), (8), (9)(A) and (10), permit consideration for the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled Thursday, April 27, 2000 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

Dated: April 19, 2000.

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-10205  Filed 4-19-00; 3:52 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22896-1 Filed:11/18/22 Entered:11/21/22 16:27:38 Desc:Exhibit Page 1 of 1
Motion to Reinstate Appeal Granted, Memorandum Opinion filed November

1, 2016 , Withdrawn, Appeal Reinstated, Order filed November 15 , 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00634

- CV

____________ MARATHON PETROLEUM C OMPANY LP , Appellant

V.

CHERRY MOVING COMPAN Y, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 405th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15

- CV

- 1324



### ORDER

On November 1, 2016 , this court issued an opin ion dismissing this appeal. On November 3, 2016, appellant filed a motion to reinstate the appeal . The motion is
GRANTED

. This court’s opinion filed November 1, 2016 , is WITHDRAWN , and our judgment of that date is VACATED. The appeal is ordered REINSTATED. Appellant ’s brief is due 30 days from the date of this order.PER CURIAM
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

CLOTHES WASHER STANDARDS WORKSHOP 

July 22, 1999 

U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Room SE-089 

/~IE 

Pwpose of Workshop: The objective of the workshop will be to discuss: 1) the process 

and analytical tools to be utilized throughout the clothes washer 

standards rulemaking process; and 2) the uncertainties in the 

Modified Energy Factor (MEF), due to apparent discrepancies in 

the remaining moisture content (RMC) results. 

Outcomes of Workshop: To provide a more detailed understanding of the process and the 

tools to be used for the clothes washer standards rulemaking and 

agree to a plan of action to investigate the uncertainties in the test 

procedure. 

9:00 - 9:30 am 

9:30 - 9:45 am 

9:45 - 10:15 am 

10:15 - 10:45 am 

PRELIMINARY AGENDA 

Opening remarks, Introductions, Agenda Review (Dan Reicher & 

Doug Brookman) 

Overview of Clothes Washer Rulemaking Status (Bryan Berringer) 

Revisions to Analysis 

Test Procedure Issue 

Plan of Action 

Consumer Analysis 

(Bryan Berringer) 

(Dick Topping, ADL) 

(Steve Grover, Quantum) 

10:45 - 11 :00 am Break 

11:00- 12:15 pm 

12:15 - 12:45 pm 

12:45 - 1:00 pm 

Shipments Analysis 

Review of Tools 

GRIM Spreadsheet 

Remaining Issues to be Addressed 

Next steps - Schedule next workshop 

Closing Remarks - Adjournment 

(Jim McMahon, LBNL) 

(Mike Rivest, ADL) 

(Doug Brookman)
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of DHB Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dawn Schlegel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  July 18, 2003                         By: /s/ DAWN M. SCHLEGEL
                                                  ________________________
                                                   Dawn M. Schlegel
                                                   Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
In Special Term —

Spender, J. presiding.

#### CHARLES BLACKWELL *v.*JAMES MONTGOMERY & WILSON BATES.

In an action in Superior Court of Cincinnati, it is not good cause of demurrer, tliat tlie petition sets forth only that it is in the “ Superior Court of Cincinnati,” without stating the county.

Nor, that petition does not contain the names of the parties, plaintiff and defendant, in the caption.

Nor, that such names are not followed by the word “petition.”

Nor, because certain averments in petition are irrelevant, or in violation of the statute of frauds.

The proper remedy is, to move to dismiss the petition, or strike out what is irrelevant.

In an action against endorser of a promissory note, the petition must set forth that he had due notice that demand had been made for payment from the maker, and that it had been by him dishonored.

On demurrer to p etition..

*41Five causes of demurrer are assigned by Montgomery, one of the defendants:

1. That petition does not set forth the name of the county in which suit is brought — it is entitled simply *‘‘*Superior Court of Cincinnati.”

2. That it does not contain the names of the parties, plaintiff and defendants, in the caption.

3. That such names are not followed by the word “petition.”

4. That a legal petition is not filed according to Code.

5. That defendant is not bound to answer certain averments of the petition, because they are “irrelevant,” and “in violation of the statute of fraud.” ■

If the petition were in truth liable to the objection stated, it could not be taken advantage of by demurrer. The proper remedy would have been by motion to dismiss the petition, or strike out the irrelevant matter. It needs but a statement of the causes of demurrer allowed by the Code, to perceive at once, that neither of the above alleged causes falls within it.

1. Want of jurisdiction over person, or subject matter.

2. Legal incapacity of plaintiff to sue.

3. Pendency of another action.

4. Defect of parties.

5. Misjoinder of causes of action.

6. Failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. See Code, Sec. 87.

The objections are not well founded, *in fact,*even if' they had been presented in the proper mode. The petition is substantially in accordance with the requisitions of the Code, and the defendants could be in no wise prejudiced by the omissions complained of. The demurrer is *42
      *considered frivolous,*and will therefore be overruled, and judgment given for the plaintiff, as prayed for in the petition, against Montgomery.

As to the other defendant, Bates, judgment is claimed against him, as endorsér upon a note given by Montgomry. The petition does not contain a sufficient statement of facts to charge him. It does not aver that he had due notice of the demand of payment of the note from the maker, and of its dishonor by him.

Before judgment can be rendered against him, the declaration must be made good by amendment — as to which leave is granted.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-4167

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus JULIAN PEREZ-CARRILLO, a/k/a Julian Valazquez, a/k/a Julian Rivera-Cambero, a/k/a Arturo Camacho-Cambero, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-00-188) Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: October 9, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. D. Thomas Lambeth, Jr., HEMRIC, LAMBETH, CHAMPION, & MOSELEY, P.A., Burlington, North Carolina, for Appellant. Benjamin H. White, Jr., United States Attorney, Steven H. Levin, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Julian Perez-Carrillo appeals from the district court’s order sentencing him to a 158 month term of imprisonment upon his conviction for conspiracy to distribute marijuana, 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994), and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, 21 U.S.C.A. § 841 (West 1999). Perez-Carrillo contends on appeal that his sentence was improperly enhanced for his role as a manager or supervisor, pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.1(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. The evidence before the court made clear that the crime involved five or more people. Further, Perez-Carrillo hired several men to unload marijuana from a truck and directed their actions, paid those men from his share of the proceeds, and rented a storage facility for a shipment ofmarijuana. In light of these facts, we have no difficulty concluding that the enhancement was properly applied. USSG § 3B1.1(b), comment. (n.2); see United States v. Perkins , 108 F.3d 512, 518 (4th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we affirm Perez-Carrillo’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 612.2135 Standards of conduct—core principles. ( a ) *Conduct.* If you are a System institution director or employee, you must: ( 1 ) Maintain high ethical standards, including high standards of care, honesty, integrity, and fairness.
( 2 ) Act in the best interest of the institution.
( 3 ) Preserve the reputation of the institution and the public's confidence in the Farm Credit System.
( 4 ) Exercise diligence and good business judgment in carrying out official duties and responsibilities.
( 5 ) Report to the Standards of Conduct Official conflicts of interest and circumstances or transactions that have the appearance of creating a conflict of interest involving yourself, your family, or your reportable business entity.
( 6 ) Work with the Standards of Conduct Official to identify conflicts and resolve reported conflicts of interest and appearances of conflicts of interest.
( 7 ) Avoid self-dealing and acceptance of gifts or favors that may be deemed as offered, or have the appearance of being offered, to influence official actions or decisions.
( b ) *Responsibilities.* To achieve the high standards of conduct of this subpart, every institution director and employee must: ( 1 ) Comply with the standards of conduct and Code of Ethics policies and procedures maintained at his or her institution.
( 2 ) Comply with all applicable laws and regulations.
( 3 ) Timely report to the Standards of Conduct Official, or use the institution's anonymous reporting procedures, any known or suspected: ( i ) Illegal or unethical activity; or
( ii ) Violation of the institution's standards of conduct and Code of Ethics.
( c ) *Fiduciary duties.* Every officer or director of a System institution must fulfill his or her fiduciary duties to the institution and its stockholders.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 79 (Monday, April 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21776-21777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10169]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Advisory Neurological Disorders and Stroke Council.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the

[[Page 21777]]

provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Neurological Disorders and 
Stroke Council.
    Date: May 25-26, 2000.
    Open: May 25, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: Report by the Director, NINDS; Report by the Associate 
Director for Extramural Research; and other administrative and 
program developments.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, C Wing, 
Conference Room 10, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Closed: May 25, 2000.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, C Wing, 
Conference Room 10, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Closed: May 26, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, C Wing, 
Conference Room 10, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Constance W. Atwell, PhD, Associate Director for 
Extramural Research, National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Blvd., Suite 3309, MSC 9531, Bethesda, MD 20892-9531, 
(301) 496-9248.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 14, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-10169 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M