alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ELIZABETH EDWARDS *v.*WILLIAM EDWARDS.

Divorce — alimony pendente lite — affidavits—practice.

Alimony pendente jite will be allowed for the support of the wife and children, on affidavits making a prima facie case; and the husband will be enjoined from disturbing the wife in the control of the children, or the enjoyment of the use of the household furniture.

Divorce. Cause alleged extreme cruelty. The petitioner filed her bill, and now offers affidavits of cause, moves for an allowance *309for herself and children pendente lite. Notice to the defendants of the motion, and of taking the affidavits, was proven.

By the Court.

The case made on the affidavits, is prima facie a strong one. The applicant may retain the custody of the children, and also the possession and use of the household furniture. He will be enjoined from disturbing her in either, and ordered to pay into the hands of the clerk of this Court, for the maintenance of his wife and children, ten dollars, within three days, and ten dollars every sixty days thereafter, until the next term of this Court; and in default of payment, execution to issue for the sum due.
#### § 6.20 Scope.

The rules and procedures set forth in this subpart apply to insured national banks, insured Federal branches, Federal savings associations, and senior executive officers and directors of national banks and Federal savings associations that are subject to the provisions of section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (section 38) and subpart A of this part.
ASSIGNMENT

     ASSIGNMENT made effective as of January 31, 2001, by Mark Gifford to
Concentrax, Inc. I, Mark Gifford, have invented a vehicle and equipment tracking
device called the SELF MONITORING VEHICLE ALERT AND TRACKING STSYEM, an
invention for which an application for United States Patent was executed. A
disclosure document for this invention was submitted to the Honorable
Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks on June 2, 1998; WHEREAS, actual
reduction to practice of the invention covered by the application has not
occurred; and

     WHEREAS, American Tracking Systems, Inc., the company that was initially
formed to exploit that invention, was voluntarily dissolved on December 9, 2000,
and as a result of such dissolution, each of nine shareholders and investors
were granted an undivided interest in and to the business products, inventions,
and other assets of such corporation;

     WHEREAS, On January 31, 2001, Concentrax, Inc. acquired all of the
business, business assets, and the "Track-Down" concept, invention and patent
application pending pursuant to a certain 351 Contribution Agreement that was
made by and among the previous owners (shareholders and investors) of American
Tracking Service, Inc. and Concentrax, Inc.(then called Miami Dade Ventures,
Inc.), which became effective on January 31, 2001;

     WHEREAS, according to that 351 Contribution Agreement, the previous owners
of American Tracking Service, Inc., including Mr. Gifford, transfered, sold,
conveyed, assigned and quitclaimed all rights, title and interest in the former
business of American Tracking Services, Inc., including the "patent pending and
the invention as described in the patent application, together with all
potential modifications and/or improvements to the invention, including designs,
concepts and work-in process" in exchange for Common Stock in Concentrax, Inc.;

     WHEREAS, the patent application was filed individually by me, and the
purpose of this assignment is to formalize my full assignment of rights, title
and interest in the patent pending and the invention as described in the patent
application , together with all potential modifications and/or improvements to
the invention, including designs, concepts and work-in process, to Concentrax,
Inc.

     NOW THEREFRE, INTENDING TO BE LEGALLY BOUND, in consideration of the
issuance to me of 1,100,000 shares of Common Stock of Concentrax, Inc., receipt
by me is hereby acknowledged, and for other good and valuable consideration, I
do hereby transfer, sell, convey, assign and quitclaim an of my rights, title
and interest in the of the patent pending and the invention as described in the
patent application , together with all potential modifications and/or
improvements to the invention, including designs, concepts and work-in process.


                                                      By:     /s / Mark Gifford
                                                              -----------------
Date:  May 17, 2001                                           Mark Gifford
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>

REVISED TO COMPLY WITH FASB 128 FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 26, 1997

</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK>        0000796502
<NAME>       WESTERBEKE CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-25-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-26-1998
<CASH>                                         154,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,327,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                    62,800
<INVENTORY>                                  6,214,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,352,000
<PP&E>                                       5,611,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,474,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,435,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,582,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,300
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,942,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,435,600
<SALES>                                     18,986,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,986,200
<CGS>                                       14,604,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,604,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,180,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             104,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,164,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                   477,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   687,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        


</TABLE>
#### Morris *v.*General Motors Acceptance Corporation *et al.*

Atkinson, J.

1. Where the defendant in a suit on a contract files an answer naming a new party, and causing him to be served, and praying that he be made a defendant and that any judgment for the plaintiff be against such new party in the first instance, and that the original defendant have judgment against such new party and the plaintiff for attorney’s fees on account of collusive and malicious institution of the suit in the name of plaintiff, and where such new party makes no objection to being made a party, but he and also the plaintiff file general demurrers to the answer on the merits of the case, and the judge entertains and sustains both demurrers, such judgment is not a final termination of the case. The case differs from *McMillan*v. *Spencer,*162 *Ga.*659 (134 S. E. 921), in which there was no service upon or appearance by and filing of a general demurrer by the new party.

*437No. 8591.

August 15, 1932.

2. “Where the sole assignment of error in a bill of exceptions is upon a judgment sustaining a demurrer to a plea, it not appearing that the case has been terminated in the court below, the case will be held to have been brought to this court prematurely, and the writ of error will be dismissed. Under the special facts of the case, it is ordered that the defendant in error have leave to file the official copy of the bill of exceptions, now in the office of the clerk of the superior court, as exceptions pendente lite.” *Bozeman*v. *Ward-Truitt Co.,*141 *Ga.*45 (80 S. E. 320). See also *MacDonell*v. *South Georgia Live Stock Corporation,*152 *Ga.*475 (110 S. E. 227).

*Writ of error dismissed, ^oilh direction.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*438
      *Thomas E. McLemore*and *Joe F. Watkins,*for plaintiff in error.

*Samuel J. Boykin,*contra.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 23 (Monday, February 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7850-7851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02329]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Nineteenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
nineteenth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 21, 2013 from 9:00 a.m.-4:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW.,

[[Page 7851]]

Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-9339, fax 
at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 224. The agenda will 
include the following:

February 21, 2013

     Welcome, Introductions & Administrative Remarks
     Review and Approve Summary of Eighteenth Meeting
     Updates from TSA (as required)
     Overall Document Status Review
     Document Section Reports
     Appendix Section Reports
     Time and Place of Next Meeting
     Other Business
     Adjourn
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 23, 2013.
Richard F. Gonzalez,
Management Analyst, Business Operations Group, ANG-A12, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-02329 Filed 2-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14OF THE 1934 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT**

 

I,Peter R. Mathewson, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K ofAldila, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

(b)         [omitted pursuant toSEC Release No. 33-8238];

 

(c)          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

 

(d)         Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)          All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  March 23, 2005 | /s/  Peter R. Mathewson  |   |
|-----------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                  | Peter  R. Mathewson      |
|                  | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         248,563
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,962
<PP&E>                                       4,693,040
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,737,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,267,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          627,903
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,639,989
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,267,892
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               392,152
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  299,037
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,667
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 69,448
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             69,448
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    69,448
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### McCowan, guardian, *v.*Snook *et al.,*executors; *et vice versa.*

Nos. 8556, 8557.

August 15, 1932.

Atkinson, J.

A suit in equity, based on separate and distinct claims against different persons', where there is no common right to be established, will be dismissed on demurrer on the ground of multifariousness. Civil Code, §§ 5523, 5419, *5515; White*v. *North Georgia Electric Co.,*128 *Ga.*539 (58 S. E. 33); *George W. Muller &c. Co.*v. *Southern Seating &c. Co., 147 Ga.*106 (92 S. E. 884).

(a) The facts do not bring the case within the principle applied in *Conley*v. *Buck,*100 *Ga.*187 (28 S. E. 97), and *Waters*v. *Brownlee,*136 *Ga.*182 (71 S. E. 6).

(&) The petition in the instant case was originally multifarious, and was so after allowance of all amendments, and as finally amended it should have been dismissed in its entirety.

(c) The judge did not err in the two judgments dismissing the action upon which error was assigned in the main bill of exceptions.

*(d)*That part of the judgment which retained the case as against some of the defendants, and upon which error was assigned in the cross-bill of exceptions, was erroneous.

*Judgment affirmed on the main bill of exceptions, and reversed on the cross-bill.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*436*T. M. Linder*and *S. P. New,*for plaintiff.

*J. K. Jordan, Tye, Thomson & Tye, T. L. Slappey, Sutherland & Tuttle, Howell, Heyman & Bolding, Shelfer & Bunaway, L. C. Hopkins, Bryan, Middlebrooks & Carter, W. P. Bloodworth,*and *E. C. Stark,*for defendants.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3229 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3229

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 44, United States Code, to transfer to the Public Printer 
the authority over the individuals responsible for preparing indexes of 
            the Congressional Record, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER TO PUBLIC PRINTER OF AUTHORITY OVER INDIVIDUALS 
              RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING CONGRESSIONAL RECORD INDEXES.

    (a) In General.--Section 902 of title 44, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:

``Sec. 902. Congressional Record: Indexes

    ``The Public Printer shall prepare the semimonthly and the session 
index to the Congressional Record. The Joint Committee on Printing 
shall direct the form and manner of its publication and 
distribution.''.
    (b) Transition Rule for Current Employees.--
        (1) In general.--Any individual who is an employee of the 
    Congressional Record Index Office as of the effective date of this 
    Act shall be transferred to the Government Printing Office, subject 
    to the provisions of this title governing the selection and 
    appointment of employees of the Government Printing Office and any 
    applicable regulations.
        (2) Treatment of accrued leave.--Any annual and sick leave 
    accrued by such an individual prior to such date shall be 
    transferred and made available to the individual as an employee of 
    the Government Printing Office, subject to applicable regulations 
    of the Government Printing Office governing the use of such leave.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall apply with 
respect to pay periods beginning on or after October 1, 2003 (or, if 
later, the first day of the first month which begins after the date of 
the enactment of this Act).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 344

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the use of public 

funds for political party conventions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2003

Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 

the use of public funds for political party conventions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Political Convention 

5 Reform Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING USE OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 

7 CAMPAIGN FUNDS FOR PARTY CONVEN8 TIONS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 95 of the Internal Rev10 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking section 9008. 
2

•HR 344 IH 

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 of chapter 95 of such Code is amended by striking the 

3 item relating to section 9008. 

4 SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS. 

5 (a) AVAILABILITY OF PAYMENTS TO CANDIDATES.—

6 The third sentence of section 9006(c) of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘, section 

8 9008(b)(3),’’. 

9 (b) REPORTS BY FEDERAL ELECTION COMMIS10 SION.—Section 9009(a) of such Code is amended—

11 (1) by adding ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

12 (2); 

13 (2) by striking the semicolon at the end of 

14 paragraph (3) and inserting a period; and 

15 (3) by striking paragraphs (4), (5), and (6). 

16 (c) PENALTIES.—Section 9012 of such Code is 

17 amended—

18 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking the second 

19 sentence; and 

20 (2) in subsection (c), by striking paragraph (2) 

21 and redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2). 

22 (d) AVAILABILITY OF PAYMENTS FROM PRESI23 DENTIAL PRIMARY MATCHING PAYMENT ACCOUNT.—The 

24 second sentence of section 9037(a) of such Code is amend-
3

•HR 344 IH 

1 ed by striking ‘‘and for payments under section 

2 9008(b)(3)’’. 

3 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

4 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

5 respect to elections occurring after December 31, 2003.

Æ
###### Editorial Note on Part 741

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 741 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 741.1 Examination.

As provided in Sections 201 and 204 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1781 and 1784), the NCUA Board is authorized to examine any insured credit union or any credit union making application for insurance of its accounts. Such examination may require access to all records, reports, contracts to which the credit union is a party, and information concerning the affairs of the credit union. Upon request, such documentation must be provided to the NCUA Board or its representative. Any credit union which makes application for insurance will be required to pay the cost of such examination and processing. To the maximum extent feasible, the NCUA Board will utilize examinations conducted by state regulatory agencies.