UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934

                 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT


             For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-15675


                           DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         Delaware                                           52-1462866
(State or other jurisdiction of                          (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                         Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the  registrant  was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  X   No ___



<PAGE>



                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



                           DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.

                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                                  June 30, 2005

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>                                                              <C>          <C>

Assets
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $ 131
   Receivables and deposits                                                     101
   Restricted escrows                                                           298
   Other assets                                                                 855
   Investment properties:
       Land                                                  $ 4,650
       Buildings and related personal property                 23,503
                                                                          28,153
       Less accumulated depreciation                          (16,462)       11,691
                                                                           $ 13,076
Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 172
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                           91
   Accrued property taxes                                                       271
   Other liabilities                                                            268
   Due to affiliates (Note B)                                                 1,083
   Mortgage notes payable                                                    18,870

Partners' Deficit
   General partners                                          $ (1,047)
   Limited partners (28,371.75 units issued and
      outstanding)                                             (6,632)       (7,679)
                                                                           $ 13,076

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>




                           DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                           Three Months               Six Months
                                          Ended June 30,            Ended June 30,
<S>                                     <C>          <C>           <C>         <C>
                                        2005         2004          2005        2004

 Revenues:
   Rental income                      $ 1,193       $ 1,135      $ 2,362      $ 2,212
   Other income                           108           119          221          252
       Total revenues                   1,301         1,254        2,583        2,464

 Expenses:
   Operating                              643           527        1,165        1,032
   General and administrative              57            59          102          112
   Depreciation                           279           272          558          541
   Interest                               368           364          734          731
   Property taxes                         128           148          271          296
       Total expenses                   1,475         1,370        2,830        2,712

 Net loss                              $ (174)      $ (116)       $ (247)     $ (248)

 Net loss allocated to general
   partners (3%)                        $ (5)        $ (3)         $ (7)       $ (7)
 Net loss allocated to limited
   partners (97%)                        (169)         (113)        (240)        (241)

                                       $ (174)      $ (116)       $ (247)     $ (248)
 Net loss per limited
   partnership unit                   $ (5.96)      $ (3.98)     $ (8.46)     $ (8.49)

</TABLE>
         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


<PAGE>




                           DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.

            CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     Limited
                                   Partnership    General      Limited
                                      Units      Partners     Partners       Total
<S>                                  <C>            <C>         <C>          <C>

Original capital contributions      28,371.75       $ 1        $28,376      $28,377

Partners' deficit at
   December 31, 2004                28,371.75     $(1,040)     $(6,392)     $(7,432)

Net loss for the six months
   ended June 30, 2005                     --          (7)        (240)        (247)

Partners' deficit at
   June 30, 2005                    28,371.75     $(1,047)     $(6,632)     $(7,679)

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>



                           DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    Six Months Ended
                                                                        June 30,
<S>                                                                  <C>         <C>
                                                                     2005        2004
Cash flows from operating activities:
  Net loss                                                         $ (247)     $ (248)
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
   provided by operating activities:
     Depreciation                                                     558          541
     Casualty loss                                                     10           --
     Amortization of loan costs                                        21           22
     Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                          5          (35)
      Other assets                                                    (91)        (129)
      Accounts payable                                                 --           37
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                               3           (3)
      Accrued property taxes                                           33           37
      Other liabilities                                               (84)           6
      Due to affiliates                                                97           55
         Net cash provided by operating activities                    305          283

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                             (344)        (195)
  Net deposits to restricted escrows                                  (71)         (61)
         Net cash used in investing activities                       (415)        (256)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payments on mortgage notes payable                                 (308)        (278)
  Advances from affiliate                                             346          169
         Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities           38         (109)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                             (72)         (82)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                      203          275
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                         $ 131        $ 193

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                           $ 706        $ 707
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flow information:
  Property improvements and replacements in accounts
    payable                                                        $ 108        $ --

At  December  31,  2004,  approximately  $53,000 of  property  improvements  and
replacements  were  included  in accounts  payable and are  included in property
improvements and replacements at June 30, 2005.

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>


<PAGE>



                           DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)

Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying  unaudited consolidated financial statements of Davidson Growth
Plus, L.P. (the  "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting  principles for interim financial information
and with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB and Item 310(b) of  Regulation  S-B.
Accordingly,  they do not include all of the information and footnotes  required
by generally accepted accounting  principles for complete financial  statements.
In the opinion of Davidson  Growth Plus GP Corporation  (the  "Managing  General
Partner"),  all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Operating results for the
six months ended June 30, 2005,  are not  necessarily  indicative of the results
that may be expected for the fiscal year ending  December 31, 2005.  For further
information,  refer  to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  footnotes
thereto  included  in the  Partnership's  Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB for the
fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2004.  The  Managing  General  Partner is an
affiliate of Apartment  Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"),  a publicly
traded real estate investment trust.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Managing General Partner and
its  affiliates  for  the  management  and  administration  of  all  Partnership
activities.   Affiliates  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  provide  property
management and asset  management  services to the  Partnership.  The Partnership
Agreement  provides  for (i)  payments  to  affiliates  for  services  and  (ii)
reimbursement  of  certain  expenses  incurred  by  affiliates  on behalf of the
Partnership.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from all
of  the  Partnership's   properties  as  compensation  for  providing   property
management  services.  The  Partnership  paid to such  affiliates  approximately
$128,000  and  $121,000  for the six  months  ended  June  30,  2005  and  2004,
respectively, which is included in operating expenses.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner charged the Partnership reimbursement
of accountable  administrative  expenses amounting to approximately  $90,000 and
$77,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively,  which is
included in general and administrative  expense and investment  properties.  The
portion of these  reimbursements  included in investment  properties for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are fees related to construction  management
services   provided  by  an  affiliate  of  the  Managing   General  Partner  of
approximately $23,000 and $2,000, respectively. The fees are calculated based on
a percentage of current year additions to investment properties.  As of June 30,
2005,  the  Partnership  owed  an  affiliate  of the  Managing  General  Partner
approximately $215,000 of accrued accountable  administrative expenses, which is
included in due to affiliates.

The Partnership Agreement provides for the Managing General Partner to receive a
fee for managing the affairs of the Partnership.  The fee is 2% of adjusted cash
from  operations  as  defined  in the  Partnership  Agreement.  Payment  of this
management fee is  subordinated  and is payable only after the  Partnership  has
distributed to the limited  partners  adjusted cash from  operations in any year
equal to 10% of the limited partners adjusted  invested  capital,  as defined in
the  Partnership  Agreement,  or upon the refinance or sale of a property in the
Partnership.  No Partnership management fees were accrued or paid during the six
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. Unpaid subordinated  Partnership management
fees at June 30, 2005,  are  approximately  $44,000,  which is included in other
liabilities.

During the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Managing General Partner
advanced approximately $346,000 and $169,000,  respectively,  to the Partnership
to pay real  estate  taxes,  pending  accounts  payable  and the  mortgage  debt
obligation  for certain of the  investment  properties.  At June 30,  2005,  the
amount of  outstanding  loans and  interest  was  approximately  $868,000 and is
included in due to affiliates on the  accompanying  consolidated  balance sheet.
Interest on the advances is charged at prime plus 2%, or 8.25% at June 30, 2005.
Interest  expense on the advances was  approximately  $22,000 and $4,000 for the
six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004,  respectively.  Subsequent  to June 30,
2005,  an affiliate of the Managing  General  Partner  advanced the  Partnership
approximately $53,000 for capital improvements at Brighton Crest Apartments.

The  Partnership  insures its properties up to certain  limits through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related  to  workers  compensation,   property  casualty,   general
liability and vehicle  liability.  The Partnership  insures its properties above
the AIMCO limits  through  insurance  policies  obtained by AIMCO from  insurers
unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner. During the six months ended June
30,  2005 and 2004,  the  Partnership  was  charged by AIMCO and its  affiliates
approximately $38,000 and $74,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees
associated with policy claims administration.

Note C - Minority Interest in Joint Venture

The  Partnership  owns an 82.5% general  partner  interest in the Sterling Crest
Joint Venture ("Joint Venture") which operates  Brighton Crest  Apartments.  The
Partnership  exercises  control  over the  activities  of the Joint  Venture  in
accordance  with  the  Joint  Venture  Agreement.  The  minority  partner  is an
affiliated  public  partnership.  As a result of the use of the equity method of
accounting  for the minority  partner's  investment in the joint  venture,  that
minority  interest  has been  reduced  to zero.  When the  Joint  Venture  makes
distributions  in excess  of the  minority  partner's  investment  balance,  the
Partnership,  as the  majority  partner,  records a charge equal to the minority
partner's  excess  distribution  over the  investment  balance.  The  charge  is
classified as distributions to minority interest partner in excess of investment
on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  Losses are allocated
to the minority partner to the extent they do not create a minority deficit,  in
which case the Partnership  recognizes  100% of the losses in operating  income.
The Partnership will recognize 100% of future net income of the Joint Venture to
the extent of previously unallocated losses and distributions.  Distributions to
the  minority  partner have reduced its  investment  balance to zero.  The Joint
Venture had a net loss of approximately  $144,000 and $92,000 for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.  The minority partner's share of net
losses for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was approximately $25,000
and $16,000,  respectively.  However, the Partnership recognized 100% of the net
loss for both periods due to the minority  partner's  investment  balance  being
reduced to zero in 2002. There were no  distributions  from the Joint Venture to
the minority  partner  during the six months  ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.  The
remaining   unallocated   losses  and   distributions   at  June  30,  2005  are
approximately $895,000.

Note D - Casualty

In August  2004,  the  Partnership's  investment  property  located in  Brandon,
Florida,  The Village Apartments,  sustained damage from Hurricane Frances.  The
damage is estimated to be  approximately  $64,000 and the  Partnership  does not
expect to receive any insurance  proceeds.  During the six months ended June 30,
2005,  the  Partnership  wrote off the net book value of the  damaged  assets of
approximately  $10,000,  which resulted in a casualty loss. The casualty loss is
included in operating expense on the accompanying consolidated income statement.

Note E - Contingencies

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
In addition,  during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint  captioned Heller v.
Insignia  Financial  Group (the  "Heller  action")  was filed  against  the same
defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action.  On or about  August 6, 2001,
plaintiffs filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller action was brought as a
purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach
of fiduciary  duty,  unfair  competition,  conversion,  unjust  enrichment,  and
judicial  dissolution.  On January 28, 2002, the trial court granted  defendants
motion to strike the complaint. Plaintiffs took an appeal from this order.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes  action and the Heller  action.  On June 13, 2003,  the
court granted final approval of the settlement and entered  judgment in both the
Nuanes and Heller actions. On August 12, 2003, an objector ("Objector") filed an
appeal (the "Appeal")  seeking to vacate and/or reverse the order  approving the
settlement and entering judgment  thereto.  On May 4, 2004, the Objector filed a
second appeal  challenging  the court's use of a referee and its order requiring
Objector to pay those fees.

On March 21, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued opinions in both pending appeals.
With regard to the settlement and judgment entered thereto, the Court of Appeals
vacated  the trial  court's  order and  remanded  to the trial court for further
findings  on the basis that the "state of the record is  insufficient  to permit
meaningful  appellate  review".  With regard to the second appeal,  the Court of
Appeals  reversed the order requiring the Objector to pay referee fees. On April
26, 2005,  the Court of Appeals  lifted the stay of a pending  appeal related to
the Heller action and the trial court's order striking the  complaint.  On April
28, 2005, the Objector  filed a Petition for Review with the California  Supreme
Court in connection with the opinion vacating the order approving settlement and
remanding for further findings.  On June 10, 2005, the California  Supreme Court
denied  Objector's  Petition for Review and the Court of Appeals sent the matter
back to the trial court on June 21,  2005.  The parties  intend to ask the trial
court to make further findings in connection with settlement consistent with the
Court of Appeal's  remand order.  With respect to the related Heller appeal,  on
July 28, 2005,  the Court of Appeals  reversed the trial court's order  striking
the first amended complaint.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

As previously disclosed,  AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company, both
affiliates of the Managing General Partner, are defendants in a lawsuit alleging
that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") by failing to
pay  maintenance  workers  overtime  for all hours worked in excess of forty per
week.  The  complaint  attempts to bring a collective  action under the FLSA and
seeks to certify state subclasses in California,  Maryland,  and the District of
Columbia.  Specifically,  the plaintiffs  contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. and
NHP Management  Company failed to compensate  maintenance  workers for time that
they were required to be "on-call".  Additionally,  the complaint  alleges AIMCO
Properties  L.P. and NHP  Management  Company  failed to comply with the FLSA in
compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in excess of 40 hours
in a week. On June 23, 2005 the Court  conditionally  certified  the  collective
action  on both the  on-call  and  overtime  issues.  The  Court  ruling  allows
plaintiffs  to  provide  notice  of the  collective  action  to  all  non-exempt
maintenance  workers from August 7, 2000 through the  present.  Those  employees
will have the  opportunity to opt-in to the collective  action.  Defendants have
asked the Court to  reconsider  its  ruling or in the  alternative  certify  the
ruling for appeal on that issue. After the notice goes out, defendants will have
the  opportunity to move to decertify the collective  action.  The Court further
denied plaintiffs' Motion for Certification of the state subclass.  Although the
outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties,  L.P. does not believe
that  the  ultimate   outcome  will  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  its
consolidated  financial  condition  or results  of  operations.  Similarly,  the
Managing  General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a
material adverse effect on the Partnership's consolidated financial condition or
results of operations.

The  Partnership  is unaware  of any other  pending  or  outstanding  litigation
matters  involving  it or its  investment  properties  that are not of a routine
nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

Environmental

Various  Federal,  state and local laws subject  property owners or operators to
liability for management,  and the costs of removal or  remediation,  of certain
hazardous  substances  present on a property.  Such laws often impose  liability
without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for,
the release or presence of the  hazardous  substances.  The  presence of, or the
failure to manage or remedy properly,  hazardous substances may adversely affect
occupancy at affected  apartment  communities and the ability to sell or finance
affected properties.  In addition to the costs associated with investigation and
remediation  actions  brought by government  agencies,  and potential  fines, or
penalties  imposed by such  agencies in  connection  therewith,  the presence of
hazardous  substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs
for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also
impose  liability for the cost of removal,  remediation or disposal of hazardous
substances  through a  licensed  disposal  or  treatment  facility.  Anyone  who
arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous  substances  is  potentially
liable  under such laws.  These laws often impose  liability  whether or not the
person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal  facility.
In connection  with the ownership,  operation and management of its  properties,
the Partnership  could  potentially be liable for  environmental  liabilities or
costs associated with its properties.

Mold

The Partnership is aware of lawsuits  against owners and managers of multifamily
property  asserting  claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the
presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial  monetary judgments
or settlements. The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property
damage loss claims  arising from the  presence of mold and for  personal  injury
claims related to mold exposure. Affiliates of the Managing General Partner have
implemented a national  policy and  procedures to prevent or eliminate mold from
its properties  and the Managing  General  Partner  believes that these measures
will  minimize  the  effects  that mold could have on  residents.  To date,  the
Partnership  has not  incurred  any material  costs or  liabilities  relating to
claims of mold exposure or to abate mold  conditions.  Because the law regarding
mold is unsettled and subject to change the Managing General Partner can make no
assurance  that  liabilities  resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold
will  not have a  material  adverse  effect  on the  Partnership's  consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.

SEC Investigation

The  Central  Regional  Office of the  United  States  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission (the "SEC")  continues its formal  investigation  relating to certain
matters.  Although  the staff of the SEC is not limited in the areas that it may
investigate,  AIMCO believes the areas of  investigation  have included  AIMCO's
miscalculated   monthly  net  rental  income  figures  in  third  quarter  2003,
forecasted  guidance,  accounts  payable,  rent  concessions,   vendor  rebates,
capitalization  of payroll and certain other costs, tax credit  transactions and
tender offers for limited  partnership  interests.  AIMCO is cooperating  fully.
AIMCO is not able to predict when the investigation will be resolved. AIMCO does
not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its
consolidated  financial  condition  or results  of  operations.  Similarly,  the
Managing  General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a
material adverse effect on the Partnership's consolidated financial condition or
results of operations.


<PAGE>




ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition  for tenants in
such markets;  litigation,  including  costs  associated  with  prosecuting  and
defending  claims  and  any  adverse   outcomes,   and  possible   environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment  properties consist of three apartment  complexes.
The following  table sets forth the average  occupancy of the properties for the
six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   Average Occupancy
<S>                                                 <C>        <C>
      Property                                      2005       2004

      Brighton Crest Apartments                     88%        86%
         Marietta, Georgia
      The Fairway Apartments                        84%        79%
         Plano, Texas
      The Village Apartments                        95%        91%
         Brandon, Florida
</TABLE>

The Managing General Partner attributes the increase in occupancy at The Fairway
Apartments to a stable property  management team and a more competitive  pricing
structure.  The Managing General Partner attributes the increase in occupancy at
The Village Apartments to a more stable tenant base.

The  Partnership's  financial  results depend upon a number of factors including
the  ability to attract  and  maintain  tenants  at the  investment  properties,
interest  rates on mortgage  loans,  costs  incurred  to operate the  investment
properties,  general  economic  conditions  and weather.  As part of the ongoing
business plan of the  Partnership,  the Managing  General  Partner  monitors the
rental market environment of its investment properties to assess the feasibility
of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing  occupancy levels and protecting
the Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of this plan, the Managing
General  Partner  attempts  to  protect  the  Partnership  from  the  burden  of
inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and  maintaining a
high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  the Managing  General Partner may use
rental  concessions  and  rental  rate  reductions  to offset  softening  market
conditions, accordingly, there is no guarantee that the Managing General Partner
will be able to  sustain  such a plan.  Further,  a number of  factors  that are
outside the control of the  Partnership  such as the local economic  climate and
weather can adversely or positively affect the Partnership's financial results.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 was
approximately  $174,000  and  $247,000,  respectively,  compared  to net loss of
approximately  $116,000 and $248,000 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2004, respectively. The increase in net loss for the three months ended June 30,
2005 is due to an increase in total expenses  partially offset by an increase in
total  revenues.  The net loss for the six months  ended June 30, 2005  remained
constant  due to an  increase in total  revenues  offset by an increase in total
expenses. Total revenues for both periods increased due to an increase in rental
income partially  offset by a decrease in other income.  Rental income increased
due to increases in occupancy at all of the Partnership's  investment properties
and in the average  rental rate at The Village  Apartments and a decrease in bad
debt expense at all of the investment properties partially offset by an decrease
in the average rental rate at Brighton Crest Apartments.  Other income decreased
due to decreases in late  charges at The Fairway and Brighton  Crest  Apartments
and a decrease in lease cancellation fees at The Fairway Apartments.

The  increase in total  expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2005 is due
to an increase in operating  expense  partially offset by a decrease in property
tax expense.  The  increase in total  expenses for the six months ended June 30,
2005 is due to increases in operating and depreciation expenses partially offset
by a decrease in property  tax expense.  The increase in operating  expenses for
both periods is due to increases in advertising,  property,  administrative, and
maintenance  expenses.  Advertising  expense  increased  due to an  increase  in
referral  fees  at  Brighton  Crest  Apartments  and  an  increase  in  internet
advertising  at The Fairway  Apartments.  Property  expense  increased due to an
increase in payroll and related  benefits at all of the  investment  properties.
Administrative  expense increased due to an increase in temporary labor costs at
Brighton Crest Apartments.  Maintenance  expense increased due to an increase in
contract  labor at The  Fairway  and The  Village  Apartments.  The  increase in
depreciation for the six months ended June 30, 2005 is due to assets placed into
service,  primarily  at The Fairway  Apartments.  Property  tax expense for both
periods  decreased due to a decrease in the tax rate for the property located in
Texas, The Fairway Apartments.

Included in general and  administrative  expenses  for the six months ended June
30, 2005 and 2004 are management  reimbursements to the Managing General Partner
as allowed  under the  Partnership  Agreement.  Also  included  in  general  and
administrative expenses for both periods are costs associated with the quarterly
and annual  communications with investors and regulatory agencies and the annual
audit required by the Partnership Agreement.

The  Partnership  owns an 82.5% general  partner  interest in the Sterling Crest
Joint Venture ("Joint Venture") which operates  Brighton Crest  Apartments.  The
Partnership  exercises  control  over the  activities  of the Joint  Venture  in
accordance  with  the  Joint  Venture  Agreement.  The  minority  partner  is an
affiliated  public  partnership.  As a result of the use of the equity method of
accounting  for the minority  partner's  investment in the joint  venture,  that
minority  interest  has been  reduced  to zero.  When the  Joint  Venture  makes
distributions  in excess  of the  minority  partner's  investment  balance,  the
Partnership,  as the  majority  partner,  records a charge equal to the minority
partner's  excess  distribution  over the  investment  balance.  The  charge  is
classified as distributions to minority interest partner in excess of investment
on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  Losses are allocated
to the minority partner to the extent they do not create a minority deficit,  in
which case the Partnership  recognizes  100% of the losses in operating  income.
The Partnership will recognize 100% of future net income of the Joint Venture to
the extent of previously unallocated losses and distributions.  Distributions to
the  minority  partner have reduced its  investment  balance to zero.  The Joint
Venture had a net loss of approximately  $144,000 and $92,000 for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.  The minority partner's share of net
losses for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was approximately $25,000
and $16,000,  respectively.  However, the Partnership recognized 100% of the net
loss for both periods due to the minority  partner's  investment  balance  being
reduced to zero in 2002. There were no  distributions  from the Joint Venture to
the minority  partner  during the six months  ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.  The
remaining   unallocated   losses  and   distributions   at  June  30,  2005  are
approximately $895,000.



<PAGE>


Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2005, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately
$131,000  compared to  approximately  $193,000 at June 30,  2004.  Cash and cash
equivalents  decreased  approximately  $72,000  since  December  31, 2004 due to
approximately  $415,000 of cash used in investing activities partially offset by
approximately   $305,000  of  cash   provided  by   operating   activities   and
approximately  $38,000 of cash  provided by financing  activities.  Cash used in
investing activities consisted of property improvements and replacements and net
deposits to restricted  escrow accounts.  Cash provided by financing  activities
consisted  of  advances  from  an  affiliate  of the  Managing  General  Partner
partially  offset by principal  payments made on the mortgages  encumbering  the
Partnership's investment properties. The Partnership invests its working capital
reserves in interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the Partnership's properties to adequately maintain the
physical  assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with
Federal,  state,  and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  Managing
General  Partner  monitors  developments  in the  area of legal  and  regulatory
compliance.  For example,  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 mandates or suggests
additional compliance measures with regard to governance,  disclosure, audit and
other areas.  In light of these changes,  the  Partnership  expects that it will
incur higher expenses  related to compliance.  Capital  improvements for each of
the Partnership's properties are detailed below.

Brighton Crest Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2005,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $215,000 of capital  improvements  at Brighton Crest  Apartments,
consisting  primarily of structural  improvement,  furniture  and fixtures,  and
floor covering and appliance  replacements.  These improvements were funded from
operating cash flow. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement
needs of the property.  While the  Partnership  has no material  commitments for
property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are
anticipated  during 2005. Such capital  expenditures will depend on the physical
condition of the property as well as replacement  reserves and anticipated  cash
flow generated by the property.

The Fairway Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2005,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $84,000  of  capital  improvements  at  The  Fairway  Apartments,
consisting  primarily of structural  upgrades and  appliance and floor  covering
replacements.  These  improvements  were funded from  operating  cash flow.  The
Partnership  regularly  evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property.
While the Partnership has no material commitments for property  improvements and
replacements,  certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2005.
Such capital  expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property
as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

The Village Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2005,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $100,000  of  capital  improvements  at The  Village  Apartments,
consisting  primarily of roof replacement,  major landscaping and floor covering
and appliance  replacements.  These improvements were funded from operating cash
flow. The Partnership  regularly  evaluates the capital improvement needs of the
property.  While  the  Partnership  has no  material  commitments  for  property
improvements  and  replacements,   certain  routine  capital   expenditures  are
anticipated  during 2005. Such capital  expenditures will depend on the physical
condition of the property as well as replacement  reserves and anticipated  cash
flow generated by the property.



<PAGE>


Additional capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from
operations,  Partnership reserves,  and advances from affiliates of the Managing
General  Partner.  To the extent that such  budgeted  capital  improvements  are
completed,  the Partnership's  distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely
affected at least in the short term.

The  Partnership's  assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term  needs
(exclusive  of  capital   improvements)   of  the   Partnership.   The  mortgage
indebtedness  of  the  Partnership's   investment  properties  of  approximately
$18,870,000 is amortized over 20 years and matures  January 1, 2021 and February
1, 2022, at which time the loans are scheduled to be fully amortized.

There were no distributions  during the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
Future cash  distributions  will depend on the levels of net cash generated from
operations, the availability of cash reserves and the timing of debt maturities,
refinancings,  and/or  property  sales.  The  Partnership's  cash  available for
distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, however,
that the  Partnership  will generate  sufficient  funds from  operations,  after
required  capital  improvements,  to permit any  distributions  to its  partners
during the remainder of 2005 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect  ownership of the managing  general partner interest
in the Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 17,448 limited  partnership
units (the "Units") in the  Partnership  representing  61.50% of the outstanding
Units at June 30, 2005. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender
offers  made by  AIMCO  or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its
affiliates will acquire  additional  Units in exchange for cash or a combination
of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO,
either through private  purchases or tender offers.  Pursuant to the Partnership
Agreement,  unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take
action with  respect to a variety of matters that  include,  but are not limited
to,  voting on certain  amendments  to the  Partnership  Agreement and voting to
remove the Managing General  Partner.  As a result of its ownership of 61.50% of
the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all
voting decisions with respect to the Partnership.  Although the Managing General
Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited  partners of the  Partnership,  the
Managing  General  Partner  also  owes  fiduciary  duties  to  AIMCO as its sole
stockholder.  As a  result,  the  duties of the  Managing  General  Partner,  as
managing general  partner,  to the Partnership and its limited partners may come
into  conflict with the duties of the Managing  General  Partner to AIMCO as its
sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles   generally  accepted  in  the  United  States,   which  require  the
Partnership to make estimates and assumptions.  The Partnership believes that of
its significant  accounting policies,  the following may involve a higher degree
of judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Investment  properties  are  recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's investment properties.  These factors include, but are not limited
to,  changes  in the  national,  regional  and  local  economic  climate;  local
conditions,  such as an oversupply of multifamily  properties;  competition from
other available  multifamily property owners and changes in market rental rates.
Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnership's
assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or
in response  to heavy  competition  from other  similar  complexes  in the area.
Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a
straight-line  basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership  evaluates all
accounts  receivable  from  residents and  establishes  an allowance,  after the
application of security deposits,  for accounts greater than 30 days past due on
current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.

ITEM 3.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing  General  Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has
evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)  under the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report.  Based on such  evaluation,  the principal
executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer of the  Managing  General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal  financial officer,  respectively,  have concluded that, as of the
end of such period,  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures are
effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have  materially  affected,  or
are reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Partnership's  internal control
over financial reporting.



<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
In addition,  during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint  captioned Heller v.
Insignia  Financial  Group (the  "Heller  action")  was filed  against  the same
defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action.  On or about  August 6, 2001,
plaintiffs filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller action was brought as a
purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach
of fiduciary  duty,  unfair  competition,  conversion,  unjust  enrichment,  and
judicial  dissolution.  On January 28, 2002, the trial court granted  defendants
motion to strike the complaint. Plaintiffs took an appeal from this order.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes  action and the Heller  action.  On June 13, 2003,  the
court granted final approval of the settlement and entered  judgment in both the
Nuanes and Heller actions. On August 12, 2003, an objector ("Objector") filed an
appeal (the "Appeal")  seeking to vacate and/or reverse the order  approving the
settlement and entering judgment  thereto.  On May 4, 2004, the Objector filed a
second appeal  challenging  the court's use of a referee and its order requiring
Objector to pay those fees.

On March 21, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued opinions in both pending appeals.
With regard to the settlement and judgment entered thereto, the Court of Appeals
vacated  the trial  court's  order and  remanded  to the trial court for further
findings  on the basis that the "state of the record is  insufficient  to permit
meaningful  appellate  review".  With regard to the second appeal,  the Court of
Appeals  reversed the order requiring the Objector to pay referee fees. On April
26, 2005,  the Court of Appeals  lifted the stay of a pending  appeal related to
the Heller action and the trial court's order striking the  complaint.  On April
28, 2005, the Objector  filed a Petition for Review with the California  Supreme
Court in connection with the opinion vacating the order approving settlement and
remanding for further findings.  On June 10, 2005, the California  Supreme Court
denied  Objector's  Petition for Review and the Court of Appeals sent the matter
back to the trial court on June 21,  2005.  The parties  intend to ask the trial
court to make further findings in connection with settlement consistent with the
Court of Appeal's  remand order.  With respect to the related Heller appeal,  on
July 28, 2005,  the Court of Appeals  reversed the trial court's order  striking
the first amended complaint.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

As previously disclosed,  AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company, both
affiliates of the Managing General Partner, are defendants in a lawsuit alleging
that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") by failing to
pay  maintenance  workers  overtime  for all hours worked in excess of forty per
week.  The  complaint  attempts to bring a collective  action under the FLSA and
seeks to certify state subclasses in California,  Maryland,  and the District of
Columbia.  Specifically,  the plaintiffs  contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. and
NHP Management  Company failed to compensate  maintenance  workers for time that
they were required to be "on-call".  Additionally,  the complaint  alleges AIMCO
Properties  L.P. and NHP  Management  Company  failed to comply with the FLSA in
compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in excess of 40 hours
in a week. On June 23, 2005 the Court  conditionally  certified  the  collective
action  on both the  on-call  and  overtime  issues.  The  Court  ruling  allows
plaintiffs  to  provide  notice  of the  collective  action  to  all  non-exempt
maintenance  workers from August 7, 2000 through the  present.  Those  employees
will have the  opportunity to opt-in to the collective  action.  Defendants have
asked the Court to  reconsider  its  ruling or in the  alternative  certify  the
ruling for appeal on that issue. After the notice goes out, defendants will have
the  opportunity to move to decertify the collective  action.  The Court further
denied plaintiffs' Motion for Certification of the state subclass.  Although the
outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties,  L.P. does not believe
that  the  ultimate   outcome  will  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  its
consolidated  financial  condition  or results  of  operations.  Similarly,  the
Managing  General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a
material adverse effect on the Partnership's consolidated financial condition or
results of operations.

ITEM 5.     OTHER INFORMATION

            None.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS

            See Exhibit Index.



<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.


                                    By:   DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS GP CORPORATION
                                          Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                           Stephen B. Waters
                                           Vice President


                                    Date: August 12, 2005




<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit


   3              Agreement of Limited  Partnership is incorporated by reference
                  to Exhibit A to the Prospectus of the  Registrant  dated April
                  13, 1986 as filed with the Commission  pursuant to Rule 424(b)
                  under the Act.

   3A             Amendments to the Partnership  Agreement dated August 20, 1986
                  and January 1, 1987 are  incorporated  by reference to Exhibit
                  3A to the  Registrant's  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K for the
                  fiscal year ended December 31, 1987.

   4              Certificate  of Limited  Partnership  dated May 20,  1986 is
                  incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 4 to the  Registrant's
                  Registration Statement on Form S-11 dated June 23, 1986.

  10M             Sterling Crest Joint Venture  Agreement  dated June 29, 1987
                  between  Freeman  Income  Real  Estate,   L.P.  and  Freeman
                  Georgia  Ventures,  Inc. is  incorporated  by  reference  to
                  Exhibit  10(c) to the  Registrant's  Report  on Form 8 dated
                  December 29, 1987.

  100             Amended and Restated  Sterling Crest Joint Venture Agreement
                  dated June 29, 1987 among Freeman Income Real Estate,  L.P.,
                  Freeman  Georgia  Ventures,  Inc.  and  the  Registrant,  is
                  incorporated   by   reference   to  Exhibit   10(e)  to  the
                  Registrant's Report on Form 8 dated December 29, 1987.

  10P             Assignment and Indemnity  Agreement dated September 25, 1987
                  among Freeman  Georgia  Ventures,  Inc.,  the Registrant and
                  Freeman Income Real Estate,  L.P. relating to Sterling Crest
                  Apartments,  is  incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 10(a)
                  to  the  Registrant's  Current  Report  on  Form  8-K  dated
                  September 25, 1987.

  10Q             Warranty  Deed  dated June 30,  1987  between  Sterling  Crest
                  Development  Partners,  Ltd., and Sterling Crest Joint Venture
                  is   incorporated   by  reference  to  Exhibit  10(b)  to  the
                  Registrant's  Current  Report on Form 8-K dated  September 25,
                  1987.

  10DD            Multifamily  Note dated  December 15,  2000,  by and between
                  The  Fairways,  L.P., a Delaware  limited  partnership,  and
                  Reilly  Mortgage   Group,   Inc.,  a  District  of  Columbia
                  Corporation,   relating  to  The  Fairways   Apartments   is
                  incorporated   by   reference   to   Exhibit   10DD  of  the
                  Registrant's  annual  report  on Form  10-KSB  for the  year
                  ended December 31, 2001.

  10EE            Multifamily  Note  dated  January 8,  2002,  by and  between
                  AIMCO  Village,  L.P., a Delaware  limited  partnership  and
                  ARCS Commercial  Mortgage Co., L.P.  relating to The Village
                  Apartments  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10EE filed
                  with the  Registrant's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
                  year ended December 31, 2002).

  10FF            Multifamily  Note dated  January  14,  2002,  by and between
                  Brighton Crest,  L.P., a South Carolina limited  partnership
                  and ARCS Commercial  Mortgage Co., L.P. relating to Brighton
                  Crest Apartments  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10FF
                  filed with the  Registrant's  Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB
                  for the year ended December 31, 2002).



<PAGE>


31.1              Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Executive  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2              Certification  of  equivalent  of  Chief  Financial  Officer
                  pursuant     to     Securities     Exchange     Act    Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1              Certification  of  the  equivalent  of the  Chief  Executive
                  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
                  Section  1350,  as Adopted  Pursuant  to Section  906 of the
                  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

  99              Agreement of Limited Partnership for The New Fairways,  L.P.
                  between  Davidson  Growth  Plus GP Limited  Partnership  and
                  Davidson Growth Plus, L.P.

  99A             Agreement  of Limited  Partnership  for Brighton  Crest,  L.P.
                  between Brighton Crest Limited  Partnership and Sterling Crest
                  Joint   Venture   entered  into  on  September   15,  1993  is
                  incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 28A of the  Registrant's
                  Quarterly   Report  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter  ended
                  September 30, 1993.

  99B             Agreement  of Limited  Partnership  for  Brighton  Crest GP,
                  L.P.  between  Davidson  Diversified  Properties,  Inc.  and
                  Sterling  Crest Joint Venture  entered into on September 15,
                  1993 is  incorporated  by  reference  to Exhibit  28B of the
                  Registrant's   Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the
                  quarter ended September 30, 1993.


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Martha L. Long, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Davidson  Growth
      Plus, L.P.;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this
      report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
      responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the small business issuer and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
            made  known to us by  others  within  those  entities,  particularly
            during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated  the   effectiveness   of  the  small  business   issuer's
            disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our
            conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
            procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
            on such evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
            internal  control over financial  reporting that occurred during the
            small  business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the small
            business  issuer's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual
            report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
            materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
            financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
      disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
      committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely  affect the small business  issuer's
            ability  to  record,   process,   summarize  and  report   financial
            information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees who have a significant  role in the small  business
            issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 12, 2005

                                    /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Martha L. Long
                                    Senior Vice  President  of  Davidson  Growth
                                    Plus GP Corporation, equivalent of the chief
                                    executive officer of the Partnership


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Davidson  Growth
      Plus, L.P.;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this
      report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
      responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the small business issuer and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
            made  known to us by  others  within  those  entities,  particularly
            during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated  the   effectiveness   of  the  small  business   issuer's
            disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our
            conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
            procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
            on such evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
            internal  control over financial  reporting that occurred during the
            small  business  issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the small
            business  issuer's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual
            report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
            materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
            financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
      disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over
      financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
      committee of the small  business  issuer's  board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely  affect the small business  issuer's
            ability  to  record,   process,   summarize  and  report   financial
            information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees who have a significant  role in the small  business
            issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 12, 2005

                                  /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                  Stephen B. Waters
                                  Vice President of Davidson Growth
                                  Plus GP Corporation, equivalent of
                                  the chief financial officer of the
                                  Partnership



<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Davidson Growth Plus,
L.P. (the "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
Martha  L.  Long,  as the  equivalent  of the  chief  executive  officer  of the
Partnership,  and Stephen B. Waters,  as the  equivalent of the chief  financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Martha L. Long
                                    Name:  Martha L. Long
                                    Date:  August 12, 2005


                                           /s/Stephen B. Waters
                                    Name:  Stephen B. Waters
                                    Date:  August 12, 2005


This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.