Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 198 / Thursday, October 15, 2009 / Notices 52991 

5.0 Environmental Consideration 

The amendment[s] change[s] a 

requirement with respect to the 

installation or use of a facility 

component located within the restricted 

area as defined in 10 CFR part 20 or 

surveillance requirements. The NRC 

staff has determined that the 

amendment involves no significant 

increase in the amounts, and no 

significant change in the types, of any 

effluents that may be released offsite, 

and that there is no significant increase 

in individual or cumulative 

occupational radiation exposure. The 

Commission has previously issued a 

proposed finding that the amendment 

involves no significant hazards 

consideration and there has been no 

public comment on such finding 

published [DATE] ([ ] FR [ ]). 

Accordingly, the amendment meets the 

eligibility criteria for categorical 

exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 

51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), 

no environmental impact statement or 

environmental assessment need be 

prepared in connection with the 

issuance of the amendment. 

6.0 Conclusion 

The NRC staff has concluded, based 

on the considerations discussed above, 

that: (1) There is reasonable assurance 

that the health and safety of the public 

will not be endangered by operation in 

the proposed manner; (2) such activities 

will be conducted in compliance with 

the Commission’s regulations; and (3) 

the issuance of the amendments will not 

be inimical to the common defense and 

security or to the health and safety of 

the public. 

7.0 References 

1. License Amendment Request dated 

[DATE], [Title of Amendment 

Request], ADAMS Accession No. 

[MLXXXXXXXXX]. 

2. Federal Register Notice of 

Availability for TSTF Traveler-448 

Revision 3, ‘‘Control Room 

Habitability,’’ dated January 17, 

2007 (72 FR 2022). 

3. Federal Register Notice of 

Availability for TSTF Traveler-508, 

Revision 1, ‘‘Revise Control Room 

Habitability Actions to Address 

Lessons Learned from TSTF–448 

Implementation,’’ dated [DATE] ([ ] 

FR [ ]).]. 

Proposed Model No Significant Hazards 

Consideration Determination for PlantSpecific Adoption of TSTF Traveler508, Revision 1, ‘‘Revise Control Room 

Habitability Actions To Address 

Lessons Learned From TSTF–448 

Implementation’’ 

Description of Amendment Request: 

[Plant name] requests adoption of an 

approved change to the standard 

technical specifications (STS), as 

amended by Technical Specification 

Task Force (TSTF) Standard Technical 

Specification Change Traveler-448, 

Revision 3, ‘‘Control Room Habitability’’ 

and TSTF Traveler-508, Revision 1, 

‘‘Revise Control Room Habitability 

Actions to Address Lessons Learned 

from TSTF–448 Implementation.’’ TSTF 

Traveler-508, Revision 1, revised the 

STS, as previously amended by TSTF 

Traveler-448, Revision 3, to address 

inconsistencies with TSTF Traveler-448, 

Revision 3. The licensee’s proposed 

changes are consistent with NRCapproved TSTF Traveler-508, Revision 

1. 

Basis for proposed no significant 

hazards consideration determination: As 

required by Title10 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 

50.91(a), the [LICENSEE] analysis of the 

issue of no significant hazards 

consideration is presented below: 

Criterion 1: Does the Proposed Change 

Involve a Significant Increase in the 

Probability or Consequences of an Accident 

Previously Evaluated? 

Response: No. 

The proposed changes do not adversely 

affect accident initiators or precursors nor 

alter the design assumptions, conditions, or 

configuration of the facility. The proposed 

changes do not alter or prevent the ability of 

structures, systems, and components (SSCs) 

to perform their intended function to mitigate 

the consequences of an initiating event 

within the assumed acceptance limits. This 

is a revision to the TSs for the control room 

ventilation system, which is a mitigation 

system designed to minimize unfiltered air 

inleakage into the control room envelope 

(CRE) and to filter the CRE atmosphere to 

protect the CRE occupants following 

accidents previously analyzed. An important 

part of the system is the CRE boundary. 

Under the proposed change, the movement of 

irradiated fuel and operations with the 

potential to drain the reactor vessel may be 

resumed following confirmation that the CRE 

occupants will be protected in the event of 

a DBA. This ensures that the consequences 

of an accident previously evaluation are not 

significantly increased. The CRE ventilation 

system is not an initiator or precursor to any 

accident previously evaluated. Therefore, the 

probability of any accident previously 

evaluated is not increased. The consequences 

of an accident during the proposed Actions 

are not significantly increased as the Actions 

require verification that the CRE occupants 

are protected by the required mitigating 

actions. 

Therefore, the proposed change does not 

involve a significant increase in the 

probability or consequences of an accident 

previously evaluated. 

Criterion 2: Does the Proposed Change 

Create the Possibility of a New or Different 

Kind of Accident from any Previously 

Evaluated? 

Response: No. 

This revision will not impact the accident 

analysis. The changes will not alter the 

requirements of the CRE ventilation system 

or its function during accident conditions. 

No new or different accidents result from 

performing the new surveillance or following 

the new program. The changes do not involve 

a physical alteration of the plant (i.e., no new 

or different type of equipment will be 

installed) or a significant change in the 

methods governing normal plant operation. 

The changes do not alter assumptions made 

in the safety analysis. The proposed changes 

are consistent with the safety analysis 

assumptions and current plant operating 

practice. 

Therefore, the proposed amendment does 

not create the possibility of a new or different 

kind of accident from any accident 

previously evaluated. 

Criterion 3: Does the Proposed Change 

Involve a Significant Reduction in the Margin 

of Safety? 

Response: No. 

The proposed changes do not alter the 

manner in which safety limits, limiting safety 

system settings or limiting conditions for 

operation are determined. The safety analysis 

acceptance criteria are not affected by these 

changes. The proposed changes will not 

result in plant operation in a configuration 

outside the design basis. Compensatory 

measures are required to be established in 

order to maintain plant operation in a 

configuration that is within the design basis. 

The proposed changes do not adversely affect 

systems that respond to safely shutdown the 

plant and to maintain the plant in a safe 

shutdown condition. 

Therefore, the proposed amendment would 

not involve a significant reduction in a 

margin of safety. 

Based on the NRC staff’s review of the 

licensee’s analysis, the NRC staff concludes 

that the proposed amendment presents no 

significant hazards consideration under the 

standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c) and, 

accordingly, a finding of ‘‘no significant 

hazards consideration’’ is justified. 

[FR Doc. E9–24773 Filed 10–14–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT 

[(OMB Control No. 3206–0138; Form RI 30– 

9)] 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request for Review of a 

Revised Information Collection 

AGENCY: Office of Personnel 

Management. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

52992 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 198 / Thursday, October 15, 2009 / Notices 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 

L. 104–13, May 22, 1995), this notice 

announces that the Office of Personnel 

Management (OPM) has submitted to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) a request for review of a revised 

information collection. This information 

collection, ‘‘Reinstatement of Disability 

Annuity Previously Terminated Because 

of Restoration to Earning Capacity’’ 

(OMB Control No. 3206–0138; Form RI 

30–9), informs former disability 

annuitants of their right to request 

restoration under title 5, U.S.C. Sections 

8337 and 8455. It also specifies the 

conditions to be met and the 

documentation required for a person to 

request reinstatement. 

We estimate 200 forms are completed 

annually. The form takes approximately 

60 minutes to respond, including a 

medical examination. The annual 

estimated burden is 200 hours. Burden 

may vary depending on the time 

required for a medical examination. 

For copies of this proposal, contact 

Cyrus S. Benson on (202) 606–4808, 

FAX (202) 606–0910 or via E-mail to 

Cyrus.Benson@opm.gov. Please include 

a mailing address with your request. 

DATES: Comments on this proposal 

should be received within 30 calendar 

days from the date of this publication. 

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments 

to— 

James K. Freiert, Deputy Assistant 

Director, Retirement Services 

Program, Center for Retirement and 

Insurance Services, U.S. Office of 

Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 

NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC 

20415–3500; and 

OMB Desk Officer, Office of Information 

& Regulatory Affairs, Office of 

Management and Budget, New 

Executive Office Building, NW., 725 

17th Street, NW., Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503. 

For information regarding 

administrative coordination contact: 

Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, 

Publications Team, RIS Support 

Services/Support Group, U.S. Office of 

Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 

NW., Room 4H28, Washington, DC 

20415, (202) 606–0623. 

Office of Personnel Management. 

John Berry, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. E9–24849 Filed 10–14–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325–P 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT 

[OMB Control No. 3206–0042; RI 25–15] 

Submission for OMB Review; Request 

for Review of a Revised Information 

Collection 

AGENCY: Office of Personnel 

Management. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 

L. 104–13, May 22, 1995 and 5 CFR 

1320), this notice announces that the 

Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 

has submitted to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) a 

request for review of a revised 

information collection. This information 

collection, ‘‘Notice of Change in 

Student’s Status’’ (OMB Control No. 

3206–0042; Form RI 25–15), is used to 

collect sufficient information from adult 

children of deceased Federal employees 

or annuitants to assure that the child 

continues to be eligible for payments 

from OPM. 

We estimate 2,500 certifications are 

processed annually. Each form takes 

approximately 20 minutes to complete. 

The annual estimated burden is 835 

hours. 

For copies of this proposal, contact 

Cyrus S. Benson by telephone (202) 

606–4808, FAX (202) 606–0910 or by email to Cyrus.Benson@opm.gov. Please 

include a mailing address with your 

request. 

DATES: Comments on this proposal 

should be received within 30 calendar 

days from the date of this publication. 

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments 

to— 

James K. Freiert, Deputy Assistant 

Director, Retirement Services 

Program, Center for Retirement and 

Insurance Services, U.S. Office of 

Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 

NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC 

20415–3500; and 

OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information 

& Regulatory Affairs, Office of 

Management and Budget, New 

Executive Office Building, 725 17th 

Street, NW., Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503. 

For information regarding 

administrative coordination contact: 

Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, 

Publications Team, RIS Support 

Services/Support Group, U.S. Office of 

Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 

NW., Room 4H28, Washington, DC 

20415, (202) 606–0623. 

Office of Personnel Management. 

John Berry, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. E9–24850 Filed 10–14–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325–38–P 

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD 

Sunshine Act 

Notification of Item Added to the 

Agenda, U.S. Railroad Retirement 

Board 

On October 9, 2009, by recorded vote 

the Board has voted to add the following 

item to its agenda for the October 14, 

2009: 

(2) Employer Status Determination 

(Decision on Reconsideration)—Trinity 

Railway Express—Train Dispatching— 

Herzog Transit Services, Inc. 

The person to contact for more 

information is Beatrice Ezerski, 

Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312– 

751–4920. 

Dated: October 9, 2009. 

Beatrice Ezerski, 

Secretary to the Board. 

[FR Doc. E9–24904 Filed 10–13–09; 11:15 

am] 

BILLING CODE 7905–01–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

Telegraph Hill Partners SBIC, L.P., 

License No. 09/79–0453; Notice 

Seeking Exemption Under Section 312 

of the Small Business Investment Act, 

Conflicts of Interest 

Notice is hereby given that Telegraph 

Hill Partners SBIC, L.P., 360 Post Street, 

Suite 601, San Francisco, CA 94108, a 

Federal Licensee under the Small 

Business Investment Act of 1958, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), in connection 

with the financing of a small concern, 

has sought an exemption under Section 

312 of the Act and Section 107.730, 

Financings which Constitute Conflicts 

of Interest of the Small Business 

Administration (‘‘SBA’’) Rules and 

Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). 

Telegraph Hill Partners SBIC, L.P. 

proposes to provide equity security 

financing to AltheaDx, Inc., 3550 

Dunhill Street, San Diego, CA 92121. 

The financing is contemplated for 

working capital and general corporate 

purposes. 

The financing is brought within the 

purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the 

Regulations because Telegraph Hill 

Partners II, L.P., THP II Affiliates Fund, 

L.P., and THP Affiliates Fund, L.P., all 

Associates of Telegraph Hill Partners 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES