alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3095 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3095

    To amend title 4, United States Code, to make sure the rules of 
etiquette for flying the flag of the United States do not preclude the 
 flying of flags at half mast when ordered by city and local officials.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2003

Mr. Doolittle introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 4, United States Code, to make sure the rules of 
etiquette for flying the flag of the United States do not preclude the 
 flying of flags at half mast when ordered by city and local officials.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Recognition Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. FLAG CODE AMENDMENT.

    Section 7(m) of title 4, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after the sentence beginning ``In the event of the death of a 
present or former official of the government of any State'' the 
following: ``In the event of the death of a present or former official 
of any city or other locality, the chief elected official of that 
locality may proclaim that the National flag shall be flown at half 
staff.''.
                                 <all>
```
H. R. 3166

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 57 Old

Tappan Road in Tappan, New York, as the ‘‘John G. Dow Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

57 Old Tappan Road in Tappan, New York, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘John G. Dow Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John G.

Dow Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         174,930
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  189,188
<ALLOWANCES>                                   46,400
<INVENTORY>                                    25,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               363,515
<PP&E>                                         560,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                 424,190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,230,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,144,549
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    171
<COMMON>                                       458,982
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,230,122
<SALES>                                        1,318,562
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,318,562
<CGS>                                          566,392
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,073,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,755,698)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,755,698)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,755,698)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.11)


</TABLE>
#### § 617.7110 How should a qualified lender disclose the cost of borrower stock or participation certificates?

The cost of borrower stock or participation certificates must be included in the effective interest rate calculation at the time the stock or participation certificate is purchased in connection with a loan transaction. For subsequent loans to existing borrowers, only the cost of new stock or participation certificates, if any, purchased in connection with a new loan or advance of new funds must be included in the effective interest rate calculation for the transaction.
# Official Journal L 195/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.195.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 195 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5521 July 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.195.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 195

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5521 July 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2012/397/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 24 October 2011 on State aid SA 32600 (2011/C) — France — Restructuring aid to SeaFrance SA granted by the SNCF
  (notified under document C(2011) 7808)

   (1) | 1 |
| | | 2012/398/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 9 March 2012 on State aid SA.12522 (C 37/08) — France — Enforcing the Sernam 2 Decision

  (notified under document C(2012) 1616)

   (1) | 19 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2012/397/EU

*

Commission Decision of 24 October 2011 on State aid SA 32600 (2011/C) — France — Restructuring aid to SeaFrance SA granted by the SNCF
  (notified under document C(2011) 7808)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2011) 7808)

1

2012/398/EU

*

Commission Decision of 9 March 2012 on State aid SA.12522 (C 37/08) — France — Enforcing the Sernam 2 Decision

  (notified under document C(2012) 1616)

   (1)

Sernam 2 Decision

(notified under document C(2012) 1616)

19

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### § 7.2002 National bank director or attorney as proxy.

Any person or group of persons, except the national bank's officers, clerks, tellers, or bookkeepers, may be designated to act as proxy for shareholder voting. The national bank's directors or attorneys may act as proxy for shareholder voting if they are not also employed as an officer, clerk, teller or bookkeeper of the bank.

[61 FR 4862, Feb. 9, 1996, as amended at 85 FR 83734, Dec. 22, 2020]
#### GAZZAM v. THE OHIO INSURANCE COMPANY.

Seal — corporation seal preserved to be used by authority — sealed note.

A policy of insurance executed by a corporation, where the corporate seal is affixed, will be held a deed, though no mention of the seal be made in the testatum clause, unless it be shown, as a fact that the policy was executed without seal and the seal affixed without authority.

A note with a seal affixed will be held a sealed instrument, although no mention is made in the body or testatum clause of its being sealed.

Assumpsit, upon a policy of insurance effected by the plaintiff as agent for the owners of the steamboat *Trenton.*Plea non assumpsit. The policy offered in evidence had the corporate seal *215affixed to it, was objected to on the trial, and ruled out; and the plaintiff was non suited.

*Starr,*for the plaintiff

now moved to open up the non suit and for a new trial. He claimed that as the testatum clause of the policy was silent as to the *seal,*that the seal ought to be rejected, and the instrument received in evidence as a simple contract. The act of incorporation allowed the company to contract *without*seal. 1 *Munf. R. 467.*

*E. King,*contra,

cited 1 *Cranch R.*332.

Wright, J.

The case in Munford was covenant. The instrument offered had a scroll annexed. It nowhere appeared in the instrument that it was supposed to be a deed and no mention was made of a seal in the testatum clause. In the absence of any such proof it was held a simple contract. The case in Cranch was *case*upon a sealed policy, and the seal was mentioned in the testatum clause, the judgment was arrested because the policy was a *deed.*The real question is whether the seal affixed to the instrument is the seal of the corporation, and was by its authority affixed to the instrument at its execution. If so, it is the corporate seal, and the policy is a deed and must be declared upon as such. It is not like a case of reference to a deed" as mere *inducement*to an *assumpsit.*The instrument on the face bears a seal with the inscription upon it showing it to be the seal of the corporation. It is therefore prima facie *its seal.*It may be shown that in fact the seal was placed to the instrument after its execution, or by some person unauthorized, or in other words, that the instrument is not a specialty; but until such proof is adduced, its prima facie aspect must be held the true one. In the scroll case in Munford there was nothing to show the scroll to have been used as the scroll of the parties. If it had appeared in the testatum clause in that case to have been so used, it would have been sufficient, but it is nowhere objected that the fact of sealing can only appear in the testatum clause of the deed. Here the inscription on the seal shows it to be that of the company; the fact of its use indicates an intention to use it as a seal. Doubtless a note with a seal, though not mentioned in the testatum clause, would be a deed, and we think so in this case. As no effort is made to prove the seal to have been affixed at any other time than at the execution of the policy, we cannot open up the non suit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION IS EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH 31,1998
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,739
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          11,568
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,355
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     69,198
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          72,601
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            73,379
<LOANS>                                        223,295
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,586
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 405,021
<DEPOSITS>                                     344,593
<SHORT-TERM>                                       319
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,742
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,482
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 405,021
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,154
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,174
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   243
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,571
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,293
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,296
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,275
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       21
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  13
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,224
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,608
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
§ 708a.106 Membership approval of a proposal to convert. ( a ) A proposal for conversion approved by a board of directors requires approval by a majority of the members who vote on the proposal.
( b ) The board of directors must set a voting record date to determine member voting eligibility that is at least one day before the publication of notice required in § 708a.103.
( c ) A member may vote on a proposal to convert in person at a special meeting held on the date set for the vote or by written ballot filed by the member. The vote on the conversion proposal must be by secret ballot and conducted by an independent entity. The independent entity must be a company with experience in conducting corporate elections. No official or senior management official of the credit union or the immediate family members of any official or senior management official may have any ownership interest in or be employed by the independent entity.
[71 FR 77167, Dec. 22, 2006. Redesignated at 75 FR 81386, Dec. 28, 2010, as amended at 84 FR 1607, Feb. 5, 2019]
Petition for exemption:

Daniel Mecca

Abbey Mecca & Co., Inc.

95 Perry Street

Buffalo NY 14203

Phone: (716) 633-1218

Email: daniel.mecca@abbeymecca.com

Section 333 14 CFR : Flying for commercial purpose

Daniel Mecca, pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), hereby petitions 

exemption from certain requirements of 14 CFR. The exemption will permit Daniel Mecca to operate a small professional 

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) (DJI Phantom 3 Professional or an equivalent or smaller UAS, under 55 lbs.), for the 

commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of various sited, developments, residential and commercial real

estate, public landscapes (unless prohibited) and special events within the United States.

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating time spans and geography, the UAS meets the conditions of 

Section 333 (FMRA) and will not require an airworthiness certificate, markings, nor the maintenance and inspections 

associated with manned aircraft. Being a battery powered aircraft, flight times are severely limited to less than 20 minutes and 

will only be flown within the line of sight during stable weather conditions. Any repairs to the UAS will be done by the 

manufacturer or authorized professionals. The UAS will be used as part of my employment with great potential for economic 

improvement of my situation. Flights will not involve the carrying of passengers or property.

An equivalent level of safety will be met by strict adherence to preflight checklists, regular inspections and maintenance, flight 

practice and safe flight techniques. Daniel Mecca will ensure that the aircraft is in an airworthy condition prior to every flight 

and that weather, environmental, structural, and human conditions are such that a safe flight can be successful. Additionally, 

the UAS that I intend to fly has built-in safety features including GPS, barometric pressure sensors, return-to-home, limits on 

flight altitude of 400 feet, real time flight video to smart phone or tablet in the app which includes detailed flight information 

and battery life indicators and warnings, on screen map, and flight logs. The app also includes flight training simulators to help 

in gaining confidence and experience.

The public interest is served in that aerial video, photography, and surveying can be achieved safely, efficiently, and 

economically. UAS flights within authorized air pace, rather than airplane or helicopter flights, reduce congested air space, are 

much more economical, and use minimal amounts of energy and no fossil fuels. UAS flights cause less noise and air pollution.

Privacy rights of private citizens, companies, and government agents and facilities will be respected. Conditions of Section 333 

will be strictly observed. The exemption will benefit the public by allowing a lower cost solution to the above mentioned.

Sincerely,

Daniel P Mecca
# AGENCY:

 Office of Governmentwide Policy, GSA.

# ACTION:

 Interim rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                         This document makes corrections to FTR Interim Rule 8 appearing in the                         **Federal Register**                         of Friday, July 16, 1999 (64 FR 38528), which amends the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) provisions pertaining to payment by the Government of expenses connected with official Government travel.                    

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

 July 16, 1999.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Jim Harte, Travel and Transportation Management Policy Division, telephone (202) 501-1538.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 In document 99-18291 beginning on page 38528 in the issue of Friday, July 16, 1999, make the following corrections:

# PART 301-5—[CORRECTED]

1. On page 38528, in the second column, correct amendatory instruction 1. to read as follows:

“1. The authority citation for part 301-51 continues to read as follows:

Authority:5 U.S.C. 5707.”

2. On page 38528, second column, add new amendatory instruction 1a.  immediately after amendatory instruction 1. to read as follows: 

“1a. Part 301-51 is amended by revising subpart A to read as follows:

3. On page 38528, second column, correct the heading “PART 301-51—PAYING TRAVEL EXPENSES” to read “Subpart A—General”. 

4. On page 38528, third column, fourth line, remove the words “Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5707.”.

5. On page 38528, third column, add “Subpart A—General” immediately preceding § 301-51.1. 

Dated: January 11, 2000.

Peggy G. DeProspero,

Deputy Director, Travel and Transportation Management Policy Division.

[FR Doc. 00-1025 Filed 1-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-34-P
121 STAT. 560 PUBLIC LAW 110–57—AUG. 8, 2007 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3206: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

July 30, considered and passed House. 

July 31, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–57 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small 

Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 through December 

15, 2007, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION 

OF PROGRAMS UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND 

THE SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to 

extend temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business 

Administration’’, approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109–316; 

120 Stat. 1742), as amended by section 1 of Public Law 110– 

4 (121 Stat. 7), is further amended by striking ‘‘July 31, 2007’’ 

each place it appears and inserting ‘‘December 15, 2007’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall take effect on July 31, 2007. 

Approved August 8, 2007. 

Aug. 8, 2007 

[H.R. 3206]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROBERT EVAN BOUCHLAS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20 2 3

- 2 069

[ July 18, 2024 ]

Appeal f rom the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Martin County ; William L. Roby , Judge; L.T. Case No. 432022CF000172A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Sue

- Ellen Kenny, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URI A M

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS

, M AY and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# Az Európai Unió C 464A/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 464A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 64. évfolyam2021. november 17. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 464A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

64. évfolyam2021. november 17.

---

| Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- |
| | Helyesbítések |
| 2021/C 464 A/01 | Helyesbítés a következőhöz: Kutatási és Innovációs Főigazgatóság – Pályázati felhívás főtanácsadói állás betöltésére – az Európai Innovációs Tanács testületének elnöke – (Ideiglenes alkalmazott – AD 14-es besorolás) – COM/2021/10408 ( HL C 432 A., 2021.10.26. ) | 1 |

Tartalom

Oldal

Helyesbítések

2021/C 464 A/01

Helyesbítés a következőhöz: Kutatási és Innovációs Főigazgatóság – Pályázati felhívás főtanácsadói állás betöltésére – az Európai Innovációs Tanács testületének elnöke – (Ideiglenes alkalmazott – AD 14-es besorolás) – COM/2021/10408 ( HL C 432 A., 2021.10.26. )

( HL C 432 A., 2021.10.26. )

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

Helyesbítések

| 2021.11.17. | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 464/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2021.11.17.

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 464/1

---

Helyesbítés a következőhöz: Kutatási és Innovációs Főigazgatóság – Pályázati felhívás főtanácsadói állás betöltésére – az Európai Innovációs Tanács testületének elnöke –

(Ideiglenes alkalmazott – AD 14-es besorolás)

COM/2021/10408

(
  Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 432. A, 2021. október 26.
  )

(2021/C 464 A/01)

Az 5. oldalon, a „Határidő” szakasz első bekezdésében:

| a következő szövegrész: | „A regisztráció határideje 2021. november 26., brüsszeli idő szerint déli 12 óra, amely időpontot követően regisztrációra már nincs lehetőség..”, |
| --- | --- |

a következő szövegrész:

„A regisztráció határideje 2021. november 26., brüsszeli idő szerint déli 12 óra, amely időpontot követően regisztrációra már nincs lehetőség..”,

| helyesen: | „A regisztráció határideje 2021. november 27., brüsszeli idő szerint déli 12 óra, amely időpontot követően regisztrációra már nincs lehetőség..”, |
| --- | --- |

helyesen:

helyesen:

„A regisztráció határideje 2021. november 27., brüsszeli idő szerint déli 12 óra, amely időpontot követően regisztrációra már nincs lehetőség..”,

---