alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### LONGWORTH *v.*GOFORTH.

Defective sale by administrators — confirmation—satisfaction—answer in chancery good, if no proof.

Where land has been sold by administrators to pay debts, but there is a'defect, in the conveyance by the administrators, if the heir at law of full age ratify the sale, or accept a satisfaction for the same from the purchaser, he will not be permitted to enforce his claim to the land.

But if such allegation be denied in the answer, and there is no proof, the bill will be dismissed.

In Chancery. The complainant in his bill alleges that one Aaron Goforth died seized of lot No. 161, in Cincinnati, leaving sundry brothers his heirs. That his administrators applied to the Court of Common Pleas, and obtained an order to sell said lot to pay debts, under which it was sold to the complainant, but no entry or record was made of said order of sale, it has been held invalid at law, and the defendant as heir at law has recovered an ejectment. That after the said sale, &c. a settlement took place between the complainant and the administrators of A. Goforth, and the heirs, in which a sum of money was paid by the complainant, and received in full satisfaction of all claims upon the lot, with a full understanding of the premises, and he prays an injunction against said judgment, and to be quieted in his title.

The answer of the defendant admits the sale to the complain*193ant, and the deed to him; but denies any agreement to confirm the sale, or the acceptance of any money for that purpose, and alleges his inability to do either at the time, because he was then a minor.

To this there is a general replication.

Lane, J.

The only ground on which the complainant can claim the interference of this Court, is that of the defendant’s having at full age confirmed the sale. The title has been adjudged upon at law, and this court cannot review the decision of a court of law. The alleged settlement, receipt of money, &c. in confirmation of the sale, is denied in the answer, and there is no proof: besides, it appears that the defendant was a minor at the period referred to, and incapable of confirming the sale.

The bill is dismissed.
# Official Journal L 83/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 83 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5931 March 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 83

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5931 March 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/428 of 23 March 2016 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions as regards the reporting of the Leverage Ratio (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/428 of 23 March 2016 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions as regards the reporting of the Leverage Ratio (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### BRICK AND OTHERS v. GREEN.

Supervisor of highways — certificates for road tax — demurrer.

An action will lie against a supervisor of highways, who maliciously refuses to give a certificate to one who has wrought out a road tax on the road, under the statute.

The supervisor for the time being is bound to give such certificates, when satisfied the work has been done, whether in office when the work was done, or he has come in since.

Error to the Common Pleas. The plaintiffs declare against the defendant, a supervisor of highways, for that the plaintiffs having worked out a road tax, had demanded their certificate from the defendant for the county treasurer, according to law, but that the defendant maliciously refused to give them one. To this there was a general demurrer, which was sustained by the Court of Common Pleas. To reverse this, the present writ of error is prosecuted.

*S. J.*Andrews, for the plaintiff in error,

cited 23 *O. L.*23, 4.

*Case,*contra,

cited 22 *O. L.*312, 315, 316.

By the Court.

The law imposes it as a duty upon the supervisor to give a certificate for road taxes, wrought out upon the roads; 23 *O. L.*23. To refuse such certificate to one entitled, may subject the party to loss, and if a supervisor so refuses maliciously, an action lies against him. The ease in the declaration, substantially shows this state of things. It is said the supervisor in office at the time the labor is done, must give the certificate. We think it the duty of the supervisor for the time being to give the certificate, when he is satisfied the work has been done, whether it was done after he came into office, or before. The necessity for it is the same in either case, and if the supervisor maliciously refuse the certificate, he is liable. It is averred in the declaration, that the defendant knew the work was done; this the demurrer admits. We think, therefore, the Court of Common Pleas erred in sustaining the demurrer, and for that error reverse their judgment, with costs.
1998 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

12-7-1998

Gallo v. City of Philadelphia

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 98-1071,98-1238

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1998

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1998 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Gallo v. City of Philadelphia" (1998). 1998 Decisions. Paper 275.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1998/275
Filed December 7, 1998 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

Nos. 98-1071 and 98-1238 

JAMES J. GALLO, JR.; 

ROSE MARIA GALLO, 

 Appellants 

v. 

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; RENALD PELSZYNSKI, LT., 

individually and in his official capacity; JOSEPH RIZZO, 

individually; MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, individually; 

GERALD J. KUFTA, individually; KUFTA ASSOCIATES; 

COZEN & O'CONNOR; PENNSYLVANIA LUMBERMEN'S 

MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; *THOMAS J. ROONEY, 

in his individual capacity; WILLIAM J. CAMPBELL, in his 

individual capacity 

 *Amended per Clerk's 4/7/98 order 

On Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 

(D.C. Civ. No. 96-03909) 

Argued October 8, 1998 

BEFORE: GREENBERG, NYGAARD, and NOONAN,* 

Circuit Judges 

_________________________________________________________________ 

*Honorable John T. Noonan, Jr., Senior Judge of the United States Court 

of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. 
ORDER AMENDING OPINION 

It is ordered that the slip opinion in the above case, filed 

on November 23, 1998, be amended as follows: 

 Insert the words "in cases against public officials" after 

 "prosecution" and before "will" on the fourth line of 

 page 16 of the opinion. 

 By the Court, 

 /s/ Morton I. Greenberg 

 Circuit Judge 

DATED: 7 December 1998 

A True Copy: 

Teste: 

 Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals 

 for the Third Circuit 

 2
§ 101.13 Operating limitations. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may operate a moored balloon or kite— ( 1 ) Less than 500 feet from the base of any cloud;
( 2 ) More than 500 feet above the surface of the earth;
( 3 ) From an area where the ground visibility is less than three miles; or
( 4 ) Within five miles of the boundary of any airport.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to the operation of a balloon or kite below the top of any structure and within 250 feet of it, if that shielded operation does not obscure any lighting on the structure.
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epolin, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



Dated: October 14, 2008       By:  /s/ Greg Amato
                                   Greg Amato,
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)



Dated: October 14, 2008       By:  /s/ James Ivchenko
                                   James Ivchenko,
                                   President
                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts:  Perry Schwartz - CFO            Ken DiPaola or Joel Pomerantz
           Baldwin Piano                   The Dilenschneider Group, Inc.
           (513) 576 - 4518                (212) 922 -0900


BALDWIN PIANO WILL RE-LOCATE WITHIN CINCINNATI AREA


         LOVELAND, OHIO, August 14, 1998 -- The Baldwin Piano & Organ Company
(NASDAQ: BPAO) today announced it has signed a lease with Cincinnati's Duke
Realty Investments, Inc. (NYSE:DRE) to re-locate Baldwin's headquarters from
Loveland to near-by Deerfield Township, Ohio. The move is scheduled for November
of this year.

         Commenting on the re-location, Baldwin Chairman and CEO Karen Hendricks
said: "We have secured separate sites in the Governors Pointe Office Park
complex for our corporate staff, our R & D people, and our wholly-owned retail
operation. The three sites are close enough so that all Baldwin employees can
easily attend joint staff meetings and work together.

         "The move to Deerfield Township will also enable the company to reduce
its overall square footage requirements by some 30 percent through more
efficient utilization of space."

         Baldwin Piano & Organ Company has marketed keyboard musical instruments
for 136 years and has been providing consumer financing for the keyboard
industry for nearly a century. Baldwin, maker of America's best selling pianos,
also manufactures electronic and electro-mechanical components for Original
Equipment Manufacturers.

                                     # # # #
### 2 A t tac h m e n t s

S h i r l ey –

A t t a c h e d is o u r G H G B

A C T ana l y s is f o r P H P P

. I w

ill a ls o pu t 3 ha r d c o p i e s i n m a il t o da y

o r t o m o rr

o w t o G e r

a r d o

. P l e a s e l et me kn o

w i f t ha t w ill b e e n o u g h c

o p i e s o f i t y

o u w o u l d li k e m o r e

.

T hank s

,

S a r a

Sara J. Head, QEP

Vice President

Environment

D 805-388-3775 ext 227 M 8 05-320-8059

sara.head @ aecom.com

A E C O M

1220 Avenida Acaso, Camarillo, CA 93012

T 805-388-3775 F 8 05-388-3577

w ww. a ecom.com 

### P HP P GH G

B A C T A n a l y s i s

H e a d, S a r a

t o :

S h i r le y R i v e r a

05 / 09 / 2011 02 : 25 P M

H i d e D e ta i l s

F ro m : " H e a d, S a r a " < S a r a

. H ea d @ aec o m

. c o m>

T o : S h i r l e y R i v e r a/ R9 / U S E PA / U S @ E PA

H i s t ory : T h i s m e s s a g e h a s b e e n r e p l i e d t o

.

GHG B A C T C ov e r L e t t e r 050911

. pdf P H P P G HG B A C T A n a l y s i s

. pdf 

### P a g e 1 o f 1

7 / 11 / 2011 f il e :// C :\ D o c u m e n t s a nd S e tti ng s \ S R I V E R 02 \ L o c a l S e tti ng s \ T e m p \ no t e s B AAA 25 \

~ w e b31

. ..
```

[110th Congress Public Law 67]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ067.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 570]]

Public Law 110-67
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
14536 State Route 136 in Cherry Fork, Ohio, as the ``Staff Sergeant Omer 
  `O.T.' Hawkins Post Office''. <<NOTE: Aug. 9, 2007 -  [H.R. 2078]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT OMER T. ``O.T.'' HAWKINS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 14536 State Route 136 in Cherry Fork, Ohio, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Omer T. `O.T.' Hawkins Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Omer T. `O.T.' Hawkins Post Office''.

    Approved August 9, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2078:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            May 21, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of the Florida Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1 p.m. and YBrickell, Miami, Florida 33131. The purpose of the meeting is to provide new member orientation, discuss affirmative action in Florida, and the Governor's “One Florida Plan.” 

Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation to the Committee, should contact Bobby D. Doctor, Director of the Southern Regional Office, 404-562-7000 (TDD 404-562-7004). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting. 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, April 17, 2000. 

Lisa M. Kelly, 

Special Assistant to the Staff Director. 

[FR Doc. 00-10044 Filed 4-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
LTS Doc#:22336-1 Filed:09/20/22 Entered:09/21/22 0

Envelope Page 1 of 2
LTS Doc#:22336-1 Filed:09/20/22 Entered:09/21/22 

Envelope Page 2 of 2
§ 617.7130 What initial disclosures must a qualified lender make to a borrower? ( a ) *Required disclosures—in general.* A qualified lender must disclose in writing: ( 1 ) The interest rate on the loan;
( 2 ) The effective interest rate of the loan;
( 3 ) The amount of stock or participation certificates that a borrower is required to purchase in connection with the loan and included in the calculation of the effective interest rate of the loan;
( 4 ) All loan origination charges included in the effective interest rate;
( 5 ) That stock or participation certificates that borrowers are required to purchase are at risk and may only be retired at the discretion of the board of the institution; and
( 6 ) The various types of loan options available to borrowers, with an explanation of the terms and borrower rights that apply to each type of loan.
( b ) *Adjustable rate loans.* A qualified lender must provide the following information for adjustable rate loans in addition to the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) The circumstances under which the rate can be adjusted;
( 2 ) How much the rate can be adjusted at any one time and how much the rate can be adjusted during the term of the loan;
( 3 ) How often the rate can be adjusted;
( 4 ) Any limitations on the amount or frequency of adjustments;
( 5 ) The specific factors that the qualified lender may take into account in making adjustments to the interest rate on the loan; and
( 6 ) If the borrower's interest rate is directly tied to a widely publicized external index: ( i ) How and where the borrower may obtain information on changes to the index; and
( ii ) When the qualified lender will provide written notice of changes to the borrower's interest rate.
[69 FR 16459, Mar. 30, 2004, , as amended at 74 FR 67972, Dec. 22, 2009]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           16519
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      253
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 16772
<PP&E>                                           12816
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   24336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       23237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     24336
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2637
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1238
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5031
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5031
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5031
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    26.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    26.28
        

</TABLE>
#### BLANCHARD *v.*THE STATE.

Pardon restores convict — execution after is void — if money is collected, it should be restored by order of court, while in hands of the officer.

A pardon acquits the convict of all the penalties annexed to his conviction.

Execution issued for the fine or-costs after a general pardon is void, and if money is collected on it and application is made while it is in the hands of the officer, the court should order it to be refunded.

Error to the Common Pleas. Blanchard was convicted of stealing bank notes, and sentenced to be imprisoned and to pay the costs. He received a general pardon from the governor. After this execution was issued for costs. Blanchard paid the money; but while it remained in the.hands of the sheriff, moved the court to *vacate*the judgment and execution, and to have the money restored. The facts were *admitted.*The court being of opinion that the pardon *378did not embrace the costs, overruled the motion. To reverse this order, this writ is brought.

*Giddings*and *Wade,*for the plaintiff in error,

cited 1 *Bl. C.*6, 276, 8, 9; 4 *Bl. C.*316, 17, 398, 9, 333, 7, 376,402; 5 *Jac. Law. D.*26, 7, 30, 32; 1 *Phil. Ev.*29; 2 *N. Y. Dig.*673; 10 *John. R.*242; 3 *John. Ca.*333.

*R. Harper,*contra.

Lane, J.

The pardon acquitted Blanchard of all the penalties annexed to the conviction; 10 *John. R.*332; *Hawk.Pardon, Ch.*37, 8, 34, 5. The execution issued after pardon was void. It should have been set aside, and the money improperly collected on it, and then in court should have been restored. The order is reversed.
#### Luke Carlin, Respondent, v. Jacob Van Clief et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the City of New York, tenth district, borough of Manhattan.

L. Sanders, for appellant; J. E. Smith, for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
§ 650.35 Notice to stockholders. As soon as practicable after a receiver takes possession of the Corporation, the receiver shall notify, by first class mail, each holder of stock of the following matters: ( a ) The number of shares such holder owns;
( b ) That the stock and other equities of the Corporation may not be retired or transferred until the liquidation is completed, whereupon the receiver will distribute a liquidating dividend, if any, to the stockholders; and
( c ) Such other matters as the receiver or the Farm Credit Administration Board deems necessary.
FRANCHISE TAXES.

[Franklin Circuit Court,

June, 1896.]

Shearer, Summers and Wilson, JJ.

#### The Ætna Standard Iron and Steel Co. v. Samuel M. Taylor, Sec. of State.

*Hard Law not Unconstitutional.*

Shearer, J.

Judgment affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of PüGH, Judge [1 O. L. D., 180], and the further reason that, in the opinion of this court, the Hard law requires the charge under it to be based upon the proportion of the authorized capital stock represented by property owned and used in Ohio All the property of this company being within Ohio and *its*authorized capital stock being $5,000,000, the secretary of state was right in fixing the fee at $5,000. .