NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID. 

 Required fields are denoted by "+".

  

Report Date: 05/05/2010            Control Technology Determinations (Freeform) 

Facility Information: LION OIL COMPANY 

RBLC ID: AR-0100

+Corporate/Company

Name: LION OIL COMPANY

+Facility Name: LION OIL COMPANY

Facility County: UNION

Facility State: AR

Facility ZIP Code: 71730

Facility Country: USA

Facility Contact Name: CHUCK HAMMOCK

Facility Contact Phone: 8708641289

Facility Contact Email: CHUCK.HAMMOCK@LIONOIL.COM

EPA Region: 6

Agency Code: AR001

Agency Name: ARKANSAS DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Agency Contact: MR. TOM RHEAUME 

Agency Phone: (501)682-0762 

Agency Email: rheaume@adeq.state.ar.us 

Other Agency Contact

Info:

+Permit Number: 868-AOP-R5

+SIC Code: 2911

NAICS Code: 115310

Facility Registry System

Number: 110017419667

Application Accepted

Received Date: 02/26/2007 ACT

Permit Issuance Date: 10/01/2007 ACT

Date determination

entered in RBLC: 01/23/2009

Date determination last

updated: 04/09/2010

Permit Type: A: New/Greenfield Facility 

Permit URL:

Facility Description: PETROLEUM REFINING

Permit Notes:

Affected Boundaries: LION OIL COMPANY

+Boundary (Class 1

Previous Page
+Boundary (Class 1

Area or US Border

Name): Caney Creek

Boundary Type (Class 1

or Intl Border): CLASS1

Distance: Between 100km and 250km 

Class 1 Area State: AR

Facility-wide Emissions: LION OIL COMPANY 

+Pollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide

Facility-wide Emissions

Increase: 1450.7000 (Tons/Year)

+Pollutant Name: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Facility-wide Emissions

Increase: 635.3000 (Tons/Year)

+Pollutant Name: Particulate Matter (PM)

Facility-wide Emissions

Increase: 304.4000 (Tons/Year)

+Pollutant Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx)

Facility-wide Emissions

Increase: 544.7000 (Tons/Year)

+Pollutant Name: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

Facility-wide Emissions

Increase: 9510.3000 (Tons/Year)

Process Information: LION OIL COMPANY 

+Process Name: NEW NO. 4 VACUUM FURNACE, SN-805N

+Process Type: 50.005

Primary Fuel: NATURAL OR NSPS SUBPART J QUALITY GAS

Throughput: 142.20

Throughput Unit: MMBTU/H

Process Notes: SN-805N IS A 142.2 MMBTU/HR (ANNUAL) SOURCE. THE

FURNACE WILL BE FUELED BY NSPS SUBPART J QUALITY

GAS. AS A RESULT OF THE REFINERY EXPANSION PERMIT

REVISION, THIS SOURCE HAS UNDERGONE PSD REVIEW FOR

PM10, NOX, AND CO. BACT FOR THIS SOURCE IS GOOD

COMBUSTION PRACTICE AND NEXT GENERATION ULTRA LOW

NOX BURNERS. 

Pollutant Information: LION OIL COMPANY - NEW NO. 4 VACUUM FURNACE, SN-805N 

+Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter

(PM) ) 
+CAS Number: 10102

Test Method: Unspecified

+Control Method Code: P

+Control Method

Description: NEXT GENERATION ULTRA LOW NOX BURNERS

Emission Limit 1: 0.0350

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGE

Emission Limit 2: 0

Emission Limit 2 Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Standard Emission

Limit: 0

Standard Emission

Limit Unit:

Standard Limit Avg.

Time/Condition:

+Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable

Requirements: OPERATING PERMIT , SIP 

Did factors, other then

air pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?: Y

+Percent Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown 

Cost Effectiveness: 14,111 ($/ton)

Incremental Cost

Effectiveness:

Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No

Dollar Year Used In

Cost Estimates: 2007

Pollutants/Compliance

Notes: SCR

+Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) 

+CAS Number: PM

Test Method: Unspecified

+Control Method Code: P

+Control Method

Description: GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE

Emission Limit 1: 0.0075

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGE
Emission Limit 2: 0

Emission Limit 2 Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Standard Emission

Limit: 0

Standard Emission

Limit Unit:

Standard Limit Avg.

Time/Condition:

+Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable

Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT 

Did factors, other then

air pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?: N

+Percent Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown 

Cost Effectiveness:

Incremental Cost

Effectiveness:

Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No

Dollar Year Used In

Cost Estimates:

Pollutants/Compliance

Notes:

+Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) 

+CAS Number: 630-08-0

Test Method: Unspecified

+Control Method Code: P

+Control Method

Description: GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE

Emission Limit 1: 0.0400

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGE

Emission Limit 2: 0

Emission Limit 2 Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Standard Emission

Limit: 0

Standard Emission

Limit Unit:

Standard Limit Avg.
Standard Limit Avg.

Time/Condition:

+Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable

Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT 

Did factors, other then

air pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

+Percent Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown 

Cost Effectiveness: 11,626 ($/ton)

Incremental Cost

Effectiveness:

Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No

Dollar Year Used In

Cost Estimates: 2007

Pollutants/Compliance

Notes: CATALYTIC INCINERATION

Process Information: LION OIL COMPANY 

+Process Name: #7 FCCU CATALYST REGENERATOR, SN-809

+Process Type: 50.003

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 9.34

Throughput Unit: MMBBL CHARGE STOCK

Process Notes: NO NEW EMISSIONS SOURCES ARE INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE
Process Notes: NO NEW EMISSIONS SOURCES ARE INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE

OF THE PROJECT FOR THE FCCU EXPANSION. HOWEVER,

EMISSIONS INCREASES WILL RESULT FROM THE INCREASED

THROUGHPUT. SN-809 IS THE EXHAUST STACK FROM THE

CATALYST REGENERATOR. HOT FLUE GAS LEAVING THE

REGENERATOR PASSES THROUGH 3 SETS OF CYCLONES TO

REMOVE CATALYST FINES & THEN IS USED TO PRODUCE

STEAM IN THE WASTE HEAT BOILER BEFORE EXITING THE

STACK. THIS SOURCE INSTALLED IN 1973. PREVIOUSLY

PERMITTED SOURCE, SN-848, THE VENT SYSTEM FOR 2

STORAGE BINS USED TO STORE CATALYST IN THE CATALYTIC

CRACKING PROCESS, HAS BEEN ROUTED TO THE WET GAS

SCRUBBER OF THE #7 FCCU UNIT. THE #7 FCCU WAS MODIFIED

IN 2004 TO INSTALL WET GAS SCRUBBER FOR THE CONTROL

OF PM10 & SO2 EMISSIONS. SIMULTANEOUS WITH THE

INSTALLATION OF THE SCRUBBER, THE FACILITY THIS UNIT

IS DESIGNED TO CONVERT APPROX 20,000 BPD OF GAS OIL

FROM THE REFINERY CRUDE UNITS & OTHER SOURCES INTO

MORE USEFUL PRODUCTS. GAS OIL ENTERING THE UNIT IS

FIRST HEATED TO 675°F IN THE #7 FCCU FURNACE (SN-808)

WHICH IS FIRED WITH NSPS SUBPART J QUALITY GAS &

EQUIPPED WITH LOW NOX BURNERS. THE HOT OIL IS THEN

CONTACTED WITH A HOT (APPROXIMATELY 1350°F)

FLUIDIZED CATALYST WHICH CAUSES THE GAS OIL TO

CRACK INTO LIGHTER PRODUCTS. THE CATALYST IS THEN

SEPARATED FROM THE PRODUCTS IN THE REACTOR AND

RETURNED TO THE REGENERATOR. IN THE REGENERATOR,

COKE WHICH HAS DEPOSITED ON THE CATALYST IS BURNED

OFF & THE CATALYST IS RECYCLED. THE HOT FLUE GAS

LEAVING THE REGENERATOR PASSES THROUGH TWO (2) SETS

OF CYCLONES TO REMOVE ANY CATALYST FINES & IS THEN

USED TO PRODUCE STEAM IN THE WASTE HEAT BOILER. THE

HOT GASES ARE THEN COOLED TO LESS THAN 500°F BEFORE

EXITING THE #7 CATALYST REGENERATOR STACK (SN-809).

THE LIGHT PRODUCTS PRODUCED IN THE REACTOR ARE

SEPARATED IN THE FRACTIONATOR TOWER & USED FOR

VARIOUS PURPOSES. THE FCCU CATALYST REGENERATOR

STACK (SN-809) IS EQUIPPED WITH A WET GAS SCRUBBER

(WGS) FOR THE CONTROL OF SO2 & PM10 EMIS

Pollutant Information: LION OIL COMPANY - #7 FCCU CATALYST REGENERATOR, SN-809 

+Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable (FPM)

Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) 

+CAS Number: PM

Test Method: Unspecified

+Control Method Code: A
+Control Method

Description: WET GAS SCRUBBER

Emission Limit 1: 0.5000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/1000

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition: COKE BURN

Emission Limit 2: 0

Emission Limit 2 Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Standard Emission

Limit: 0

Standard Emission

Limit Unit:

Standard Limit Avg.

Time/Condition:

+Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable

Requirements: NSPS , MACT , SIP , OPERATING PERMIT , OTHER 

Did factors, other then

air pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?: Y

+Percent Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown 

Cost Effectiveness: 88,074 ($/ton)

Incremental Cost

Effectiveness:

Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No

Dollar Year Used In

Cost Estimates: 2007

Pollutants/Compliance

Notes: WET ESP

+Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) 

+CAS Number: 630-08-0

Test Method: Unspecified

+Control Method Code: P

+Control Method

Description: HIGH TEMPERATURE REGENERATION

Emission Limit 1: 100.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: PPMDV

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition: 365 DAY AVERAGE, CEMS

Emission Limit 2: 500.0000

Emission Limit 2 Unit: PPMDV

Emission Limit 2 Avg.
Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition: 1-HR AVERAGE, CEMS

Standard Emission

Limit: 0

Standard Emission

Limit Unit:

Standard Limit Avg.

Time/Condition:

+Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable

Requirements: NSPS , SIP , OPERATING PERMIT , OTHER 

Did factors, other then

air pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?: N

+Percent Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown 

Cost Effectiveness:

Incremental Cost

Effectiveness:

Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No

Dollar Year Used In

Cost Estimates:

Pollutants/Compliance

Notes:

Process Information: LION OIL COMPANY 

+Process Name: #9 COOLING TOWER, SN-853-9

+Process Type: 50.006

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 10.50

Throughput Unit: BILLION GAL/12-MONTH

Process Notes: THE #9 COOLING TOWER WILL BE INSTALLED AS A RESULT

OF THE REFINERY EXPANSION. SN-853-9 WAS ADDED TO

ACCOUNT FOR EMISSIONS FROM THE SOURCE SINCE THESE

EMISSIONS WERE RELIED UPON IN THE PSD NETTING

ANALYSIS. THIS SOURCE UNDERWENT A BACT REVIEW FOR

PARTICULATE. BACT WAS DETERMINED TO BE THE USE OF

DRIFT ELIMINATORS.

Pollutant Information: LION OIL COMPANY - #9 COOLING TOWER, SN-853-9 

+Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) 

+CAS Number: PM

Test Method: Unspecified
+Control Method Code: A

+Control Method

Description: DRIFT ELIMINATORS, 0.005%

Emission Limit 1: 3000.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: MG/L TDS CONCENTRATI

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition: ANNUAL AVERAGE, MONITORED WEEKLY

Emission Limit 2: 0

Emission Limit 2 Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Standard Emission

Limit: 0

Standard Emission

Limit Unit:

Standard Limit Avg.

Time/Condition:

+Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable

Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT 

Did factors, other then

air pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?: N

+Percent Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown 

Cost Effectiveness:

Incremental Cost

Effectiveness:

Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No

Dollar Year Used In

Cost Estimates:

Pollutants/Compliance

Notes:

Process Information: LION OIL COMPANY 

+Process Name: PRE-FLASH COLUMN REBOILER, SN-803

+Process Type: 50.005

Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS OR NSPS J QUALITY GAS

Throughput: 40.00

Throughput Unit: MMBTU/H

Process Notes: THE PRE-FLASH COLUMN REBOILER (SN-803) IS A NSPS
Process Notes: THE PRE-FLASH COLUMN REBOILER (SN-803) IS A NSPS

SUBPART J QUALITY GAS FIRED FURNACE USED TO MAINTAIN

THE TEMPERATURE IN THE COLUMN. RETROFIT SN-803 WITH

NEXT GENERATION ULTRA LOW NOX BURNERS. THESE

SOURCES WILL NOT EXPERIENCE AN INCREASE IN NOX OR CO

EMISSIONS. THEREFORE, A BACT ANALYSIS WAS NOT

REQUIRED FOR NOX OR CO FROM THESE TWO HEATERS. A

PM10 BACT ANALYSIS WAS STILL REQUIRED. THIS RETROFIT

IS REQUIRED BY THE CONSENT DECREE. 

Pollutant Information: LION OIL COMPANY - PRE-FLASH COLUMN REBOILER, SN-803 

+Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) 

+CAS Number: PM

Test Method: Unspecified

+Control Method Code: P

+Control Method

Description: GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE

Emission Limit 1: 0.0075

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGE

Emission Limit 2: 0

Emission Limit 2 Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Standard Emission

Limit: 0

Standard Emission

Limit Unit:

Standard Limit Avg.

Time/Condition:

+Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable

Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT 

Did factors, other then

air pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?: N

+Percent Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown 

Cost Effectiveness:

Incremental Cost

Effectiveness:

Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No

Dollar Year Used In
Dollar Year Used In

Cost Estimates:

Pollutants/Compliance

Notes:

Process Information: LION OIL COMPANY 

+Process Name: CONVERTED #4 PRE-FLASH COLUMN REBOILER, SN-805

+Process Type: 50.005

Primary Fuel: NATURAL OR NSPS SUBPART J QUALITY GAS

Throughput: 75.00

Throughput Unit: MMBTU/H

Process Notes: SN-805 IS NOT SUBJECT TO BACT FOR NOX AND CO BECAUSE

THESE SOURCES ARE BEING REPLACED WITH ULTRA LOW

NOX BURNERS BEFORE THE REFINERY EXPANSION WILL

COME ON LINE, AND THUS, WILL EXPERIENCE DECREASES IN

NOX AND CO. BOTTOMS FROM THE COLUMN ARE HEATED IN

THE FUEL GAS FIRED VACUUM FURNACE (SN 805) PRIOR TO

VACUUM DISTILLATION. THE VACUUM COLUMN SEPARATES

THE BOTTOMS INTO GAS OIL AND ASPHALT PRODUCTS.

SN-805 IS A 75 MM BTU/HR REBOILER (NOMINAL DESIGN). IT

WAS INSTALLED IN 1996 AND WILL BE RETROFITTED WITH

NEXT GENERATION, ULTRA LOW NOX BURNERS. ON MAY 17,

2000, THIS SOURCE WAS TESTED FOR NOX EMISSIONS USING

EPA REFERENCE METHOD 7E PURSUANT TO §19.702 OF

REGULATION 19, AND 40 C.F.R., PART 52, SUBPART E. THE TEST

RESULTS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT DEMONSTRATED

COMPLIANCE. AS A RESULT OF THE REFINERY EXPANSION

PERMIT REVISION, THIS SOURCE HAS UNDERGONE PSD

REVIEW FOR PM10. BACT FOR THIS SOURCE IS GOOD

COMBUSTION PRACTICE. 

Pollutant Information: LION OIL COMPANY - CONVERTED #4 PRE-FLASH COLUMN

REBOILER, SN-805 

+Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) 

+CAS Number: PM

Test Method: Unspecified

+Control Method Code: P

+Control Method

Description: GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE

Emission Limit 1: 0.0075

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGE

Emission Limit 2: 0
Emission Limit 2 Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Standard Emission

Limit: 0

Standard Emission

Limit Unit:

Standard Limit Avg.

Time/Condition:

+Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable

Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT 

Did factors, other then

air pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?: N

+Percent Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown 

Cost Effectiveness:

Incremental Cost

Effectiveness:

Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No

Dollar Year Used In

Cost Estimates:

Pollutants/Compliance

Notes:

Process Information: LION OIL COMPANY 

+Process Name: NO. 4 ATMOSPHERIC FURNACE, SN-804

+Process Type: 50.005

Primary Fuel: NATURAL OR NSPS J QUALITY GAS

Throughput: 280.00

Throughput Unit: MMBTU/H

Process Notes: BOTTOMS FROM THE COLUMN ARE HEATED IN THE FUEL GAS

FIRED ATMOSPHERIC TOPPING FURNACE (SN 804) PRIOR TO

DISTILLATION AT ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE. SN-804 IS A 280

MMBTU/HR SOURCE USED TO HEAT THE BOTTOMS FROM THE

PRE-FLASH COLUMN IN ORDER TO SEPARATE THEM INTO

NAPHTHA, KEROSENE, DIESEL, AND GAS OIL. THE FURNACE IS

FUELED BY NSPS SUBPART J QUALITY GAS. AS A RESULT OF

THE REFINERY EXPANSION PERMIT REVISION, THIS SOURCE

HAS UNDERGONE PSD REVIEW FOR PM10, NOX, AND CO. BACT

FOR THIS SOURCE IS GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE AND

NEXT GENERATION ULTRA LOW NOX BURNERS. 
Pollutant Information: LION OIL COMPANY - NO. 4 ATMOSPHERIC FURNACE, SN-804 

+Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter

(PM) ) 

+CAS Number: 10102

Test Method: Unspecified

+Control Method Code: B

+Control Method

Description: EXISTING NEXT GENERATION ULTRA LOW NOX BURNERS

Emission Limit 1: 0.0450

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGE

Emission Limit 2: 0

Emission Limit 2 Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Standard Emission

Limit: 0

Standard Emission

Limit Unit:

Standard Limit Avg.

Time/Condition:

+Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable

Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT , OTHER 

Did factors, other then

air pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?: Y

+Percent Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown 

Cost Effectiveness: 10,408 ($/ton)

Incremental Cost

Effectiveness:

Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No

Dollar Year Used In

Cost Estimates: 2004

Pollutants/Compliance

Notes:

COST FOR SLIGHTLY MORE, 0.035 LB/MMBTU, CONTROL

BASED UPON NEWER ULNB

+Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) 

+CAS Number: PM

Test Method: Unspecified

+Control Method Code: P
+Control Method

Description: GOOD COMBUSTINON PRACTICE

Emission Limit 1: 0.0075

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGE

Emission Limit 2: 0

Emission Limit 2 Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Standard Emission

Limit: 0

Standard Emission

Limit Unit:

Standard Limit Avg.

Time/Condition:

+Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable

Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT 

Did factors, other then

air pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?: N

+Percent Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown 

Cost Effectiveness:

Incremental Cost

Effectiveness:

Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No

Dollar Year Used In

Cost Estimates:

Pollutants/Compliance

Notes:

+Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) 

+CAS Number: 630-08-0

Test Method: Unspecified

+Control Method Code: P

+Control Method

Description: GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE

Emission Limit 1: 0.0400

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition: 3-HR AVERAGE

Emission Limit 2: 0

Emission Limit 2 Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.
Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Standard Emission

Limit: 0

Standard Emission

Limit Unit:

Standard Limit Avg.

Time/Condition:

+Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable

Requirements: SIP , OPERATING PERMIT 

Did factors, other then

air pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?: Y

+Percent Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown 

Cost Effectiveness: 10,060 ($/ton)

Incremental Cost

Effectiveness:

Cost Verified (Y/N)?: No

Dollar Year Used In

Cost Estimates: 2007

Pollutants/Compliance

Notes: CATALYTIC OXIDATION 

Previous Page