alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132027 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132027 

 COA: 260589 
 Ingham CC: 03-000466-FC

MARCUS DONTE MIDDLEBROOK, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 18, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2006 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3048 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3048

 To limit assistance for the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinian 
                    people during fiscal year 2004.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2003

  Mr. Otter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit assistance for the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinian 
                    people during fiscal year 2004.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON ASSISTANCE FOR THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY AND 
              THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE.

    (a) General Prohibition on Funds.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, amounts available for assistance for the Palestinian 
Authority (or any other Palestinian entity) or for the Palestinian 
people may not be obligated or expended during a quarter of fiscal year 
2004 if the Secretary of State determines that the Palestinian 
Authority has provided support for acts of international terrorism 
during the prior 3-month period.
    (b) Limitation on Rate of Obligation and Expenditure.--
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, of the total amount of 
funds appropriated by the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and 
Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2004, that are available for 
assistance for the Palestinian Authority (or any other Palestinian 
entity) or for the Palestinian people, not more than 25 percent of such 
amount may be obligated and expended during each quarter of fiscal year 
2004.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 13

- 00147

- CR

EX PARTE Herbey Medrano DEHOYOS

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 1196

- B

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 12, 2013

DIS MISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal by withdrawing his notice of appeal.

The motion is granted

, and this appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
§ 365.2 Real estate lending standards. ( a ) Each FDIC-supervised institution shall adopt and maintain written policies that establish appropriate limits and standards for extensions of credit that are secured by liens on or interests in real estate, or that are made for the purpose of financing permanent improvements to real estate.
( b ) ( 1 ) Real estate lending policies adopted pursuant to this section must: ( i ) Be consistent with safe and sound banking practices;
( ii ) Be appropriate to the size of the institution and the nature and scope of its operations; and
( iii ) Be reviewed and approved by the FDIC-supervised institution's board of directors at least annually.
( 2 ) The lending policies must establish: ( i ) Loan portfolio diversification standards;
( ii ) Prudent underwriting standards, including loan-to-value limits, that are clear and measurable;
( iii ) Loan administration procedures for the FDIC-supervised institution's real estate portfolio; and
( iv ) Documentation, approval, and reporting requirements to monitor compliance with the FDIC-supervised institution's real estate lending policies.
( c ) Each FDIC-supervised institution must monitor conditions in the real estate market in its lending area to ensure that its real estate lending policies continue to be appropriate for current market conditions.
( d ) The real estate lending policies adopted pursuant to this section should reflect consideration of the Interagency Guidelines for Real Estate Lending Policies established by the Federal bank and thrift supervisory agencies.
[57 FR 62896, 62900, Dec. 31, 1992, as amended at 84 FR 31173, July 1, 2019]
# c r T\-\^ i SRIRI TOF: " ALASK A V'/ P

• ' V L v - 1 1 1 rT'i"' "

'••••'•• "

- —o . -

# r'^ . Octobe r26 . 201 1 Docket s - Docket s OS T96-196 0 U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n 40 0 Sevent h Street, S.W . Roo m P L40 1 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 RE : Peninsul a Airway s d/b/a PenAi roperate d i n partnershi p wit h Alask a Airline s - Famil y Assistanc e Progra m PenAi roperate s i n partnershi p wit h Alask a Airlines . Thes e operation s ar e conducte d unde ra cod e shar e agreemen t wit h Alask a Airlines , an d wil l b e covere d unde rth e Alask a Airlines ' Famil y Assistanc e Plan . Th e Alask a Airlines ' Famil yAssistanc e Pla n o n fil e wit h you roffice , detail s coverag e a s require d b yth e amende d Aviatto n Disaste rFamil yAssistanc e Ac t o f199 6 (4 9 U.S.C . 113 6 an d 41113) , alon g wit h requirement s specifie d i n Virio n 100 . Alask a Airline s ha s entere d int o contrac t wit h Empathia , Inc . (formerl yNEAS , Inc.) , fo rproviski n o faviatio n disaste rrespons e an d famil yassistanc e services . I n th e even t o fa n aviatio n acciden t o rincident , Empathia , Inc . wil l provid e th e folbwin g service s o n behal fo fAlask a Airlines : •Next o fKi n Notificatio n Th e Alask a Airline s Emergenc yRespons e pla n outline s responsibilitie s i n addressin g th e airlin e victi m suppor t task s withi n th e Aviatio n Disaste rFamil yAssistanc e Pla n i n greate rdetail . Shoul d yo u hav e questions , pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t m e a t o rvi a emai l a t Sincerely , Bria n whilde n Vic e PreskJent , Safety/ Complianc e

PenAi r '610 0 Boein g Avenu e Anchorage , Alask a9950 2 Peninsul aAirways , In ZD/B/ APENAIR ' • www.penair.con i
#### §§ 324.161-324.160 [Reserved]
§ 625.13 When an application may be filed. ( a ) An application may be filed whenever the applicant has prevailed in the adversary adjudication, or in a significant and discrete substantive portion thereof, but in no case later than 30 days after the FCA's final disposition of the adversary adjudication.
( b ) For purposes of this rule, final disposition means the date on which a decision or order disposing of the merits of the adversary adjudication is issued or any other complete resolution of the adversary adjudication, such as a settlement or voluntary dismissal, becomes final and is unreviewable by the FCA, any other administrative body, or the courts.
( c ) If review, reconsideration, or appeal is sought or taken of an adversary adjudication decision as to which an applicant believes it has prevailed, application proceedings for any award of fees and other expenses shall be stayed pending final disposition of the underlying controversy.
Robert J Koltai

Managing Member 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19956-1 Filed:01/31/22 Entered:01/31/22 14:37:44 Desc:

Exhibit Evidence of Transfer of Claim Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(dollars in thousands, except ratio data) Year Ended December 31,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2000Fixed Charges:Interest expense on
indebtedness
(including
amortization of
debt
expense
and discount)
    
    $
    22,868
    
    
    $
    23,723
    
    
    $
    23,746
    
    
    $
    24,638
    
    
    $
    22,088Interest expense on
portion of rent
expense
representative
of interest
    
    
    9,089
    
    
    
    7,604
    
    
    
    7,206
    
    
    
    6,159
    
    
    
    3,251Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    31,957
    
    
    $
    31,327
    
    
    $
    30,952
    
    
    $
    30,797
    
    
    $
    25,339Earnings (Loss):Net loss before
provision for
income
taxes and
cumulative
effect of
change in
accounting
principle
    
    $
    (242,898
    )
    
    $
    (185,324
    )
    
    $
    (219,716
    )
    
    $
    (117,152
    )
    
    $
    (235,331
    )Fixed Charges per
above
    
    
    31,957
    
    
    
    31,327
    
    
    
    30,952
    
    
    
    30,797
    
    
    
    25,339Total Earnings
(Loss)
    
    $
    (210,941
    )
    
    $
    (153,997
    )
    
    $
    (188,764
    )
    
    $
    ( 86,355
    )
    
    $
    (209,992
    )Ratio of Earnings to
Fixed Charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Coverage deficiency
(1)(2)(3)(4)
    
    $
    (242,898
    )
    
    $
    (185,324
    )
    
    $
    (219,716
    )
    
    $
    (117,152
    )
    
    $
    (235,331
    )
  (1)
    The Companys Coverage deficiency for 2004 includes net charges of $12,975, relating to a
$15,408 charge for restructuring partially offset by a gain recognized on the extinguishment
of debt of $2,433.  (2)
    The Companys Coverage deficiency for 2002 includes charges aggregating $46,396 arising from
the Companys impairment charge relating to its investment in CAT and a charge for
construction design changes of $32,158 and $14,238, respectively.  (3)
    The Companys Coverage deficiency for 2001 includes charges aggregating $26,208 arising from
the Companys impairment charge relating to its investment in Transgene and debt conversion
expenses of $22,314 and $3,894, respectively.  (4)
    The Companys Coverage deficiency for 2000 includes charges aggregating $184,868 arising from
purchased in-process research and development and debt conversion expenses of $134,050 and
$50,818, respectively.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
      the


Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002





The
      undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their
      knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
      September 30, 2006 of Naturade, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended, and that the information contained in such periodic report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such
      report.




/s/ Richard
              MunroRichard
              Munro*Chief Executive Officer*November
              14, 2006




/s/ 
Adam
                MichelinAdam Michelin
                *Principal Accounting Officer*November 14,
                  2006


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and it will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

## Notification of Item Added to the Agenda, U.S. Railroad Retirement Board

*On October 9, 2009, by recorded vote the Board has voted to add the following item to its agenda for the October 14, 2009:*

(2) Employer Status Determination (Decision on Reconsideration)—Trinity Railway Express—Train Dispatching—Herzog Transit Services, Inc.

The person to contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

Dated: October 9, 2009.

Beatrice Ezerski,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-24904 Filed 10-13-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                         634,233
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,555,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,972
<INVENTORY>                                  2,596,552
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,485,743
<PP&E>                                       7,922,544
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,021,794
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,872,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,283,820
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,661
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,095,820
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,872,711
<SALES>                                     22,796,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,799,212
<CGS>                                       20,092,285
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,057,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             331,625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                318,168
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            325,668
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   325,668
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
**Exhibit31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, Frederick J. Rowan, II, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Carter’s, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 12, 2004 |                        |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                    |                        |
|                    | /s/ FREDERICK J.  ROWAN, II |
|                    | Frederick J.  Rowan, II     |
| * *                | *Chief Executive Officer*   |

 

27

----
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3368

To direct the Secretary of Labor to establish a pilot grant program to 

retrain displaced workers in high technology fields. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 21, 2003

Mr. SHUSTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Labor to establish a pilot grant 

program to retrain displaced workers in high technology 

fields.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HIGH TECHNOLOGY TRAINING GRANTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Pursuant to section 156 of the 

5 Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2896), the 

6 Secretary of Labor (in this section referred to as the Sec7 retary) shall establish a pilot grant program for the pur8 pose of awarding grants to eligible vocational and career 

9 technology schools for retraining displaced workers in high 

10 technology fields. 
2

•HR 3368 IH 

1 (b) AMOUNT OF GRANT.—The amount of a grant 

2 awarded pursuant to this section shall be $10,000 for each 

3 displaced worker enrolled in a high technology training 

4 program at an eligible vocational or career technology 

5 school. 

6 (c) ELIGIBLE VOCATIONAL OR CAREER TECHNOLOGY

7 SCHOOL.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘eligible 

8 vocational or career technology school’’ means a school or 

9 vocational or career training center in the State of Penn10 sylvania that conducts training in high technology fields. 

11 (d) APPLICATIONS.—In order to receive a grant 

12 under the program established pursuant to this section, 

13 a vocational or career technology school, or other school 

14 as the Secretary may determine to be qualified, shall sub15 mit an application at such time, in such manner, and con16 taining such information as the Secretary shall determine. 

17 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

18 are authorized to be appropriated $50,000,000 for fiscal 

19 year 2005 for carrying out this section.

Æ
In Special Term —

Gholson, J. presiding.

#### SUMMIT COUNTY BANK *vs.*W. F. SMITH & Co.

In an action upon a bill of exchange, a claim for statutory damages and costs of protest need not be set forth in the petition, as a separate and distinct canse of action, disconnected from the claim on the bill.

Gholson, J.

This is an action on a bill of exchange, for its amount and interest, and also for statutory damages and costs of protest. The pleader sets out a cause of action on the bill for the amount payable on its face and interest, under Section 122 of the Code; and then sets out another and distinct cause of action for the damages and protest. To this second cause of action, there is a demurrer.

Standing alone and without reference to the first cause of action, the facts to sustain the second are not sufficiently stated. To state them sufficiently, the bill, from the non-payment of which the damages arose, would have to be set out; and this clearly shows, that a claim for the damages, disconnected from the claim on the bill, is unnecessary. The Statute allowing the damages plainly contemplates, that they are to be recovered in an action on the bill; they become a part of the same cause of action, and need not be separated any more than the claim for interest.

The demurrer will be sustained, and the petition can be amended forthwith, by striking out the figures 1 and 2, separating the causes of action. The answer already filed, denying notice, will still be a perfect answer, and the case will at once stand for trial.
#### § 403.6 Systematic review for declassification.

Classified information determined by the Archivist of the United States to be of sufficient value to warrant permanent retention will be subject to systematic declassification review by the Archivist in accordance with guidelines provided by the Bank, as originator of the information. These guidelines shall be developed by the Security Officer who is designated by the Bank to assist the Archivist in the review process. The guidelines shall be reviewed every five years or as requested by the Archivist of the United States.
§ 611.501 Procedures. ( a ) The boards of directors of a bank and an association which seek to transfer authorities may adopt appropriate resolutions approving such transfer and providing for the submission of such a proposal to their respective stockholders for a vote.
( b ) The resolutions accompanied by the following information shall be submitted to the Farm Credit Administration for review and approval: ( 1 ) Any proposed amendments to the charters of the institutions;
( 2 ) A copy of the transfer plan as required under § 611.520 of this part;
( 3 ) An information statement that complies with the requirements of § 611.515;
( 4 ) The proposed bylaws of the bank and the association, as applicable; and
( 5 ) Any additional information the boards of directors wish to submit in support of the request or that the Farm Credit Administration requests.