### 29520 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Notices

the Department has found and
continues to find no evidence that Hunan Valin had shipments or entries of subject merchandise during the POR and no interested party has commented on the issue. Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Department is rescinding the antidumping duty administrative review with respect to
Hunan Valin.

Assessment

The Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties at the cash deposit rate in effect on the date of entry, for entries during the period November 1, 2008 through October 31, 2009. The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of this
notice of rescission of administrative

review.

Notification to Importers

This notice serves as a final reminder to importers whose entries will be liquidated as a result of this rescission notice, of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s assumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order ( ‘‘ APO ’’ )

This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under an APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.

This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).

Dated: May 19, 2010.

John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.

[FR Doc. 2010–12661 Filed 5ndash;25–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY** 
**COMMISSION**

**[Docket No. CPSC–2009–0073]**

**Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of**  **Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Virginia Graeme**  **Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act; Compliance Form** 

**AGENCY :**  Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Consumer Product Safety Commission ( ‘‘ CPSC ’’ ) is announcing that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget ( ‘‘ OMB ’’ ) for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

**DATES :**  Fax written comments on the collection of information by June 25,

2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  To ensure that comments on the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: CPSC Desk Officer, FAX: 202–395–6974, or e-mailed to

oira

_ submission@omb.eop.gov. All comments should be identified by the
CPSC Docket No. CPSC–2009–0073 and
the title ‘‘Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act; Compliance Form. ’’
The written comments should also be submitted to the CPSC, identified by Docket No. CPSC–2009–0073, by any of the following methods:

Submit electronic comments in the following way:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. To ensure timely processing of comments, the Commission is no longer accepting comments submitted by electronic mail (e-mail) except through http://www.regulations.gov.

Submit written submissions in the following way:

Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions), preferably in five copies, to: Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 502, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 504–7923.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All comments received may be posted without change, including any personal identifiers, contact information, or other personal information provided, to http://www.regulations.gov. Do not submit confidential business information, trade secret information, or other sensitive or protected information electronically. Such information should be submitted in writing.

Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http:// www.regulations.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Linda Glatz, Division of Policy and Planning, Office of Information Technology, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301–504–7671, lglatz@cpsc.gov

.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, the CPSC has submitted the following proposed collection of information to
OMB for review and clearance. TITLE: Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act; Compliance Form (Docket No. CPSC–2009–0073).

The Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act ( ‘‘ Pool and Spa Safety

Act’’ ) went into effect on December 19, 2008 (Pub. L. 110–140). The Pool and Spa Safety Act applies to public pools and spas and requires that each swimming pool and spa drain cover manufactured, distributed, or entered
into commerce in the United States shall conform to the entrapment protection standards of the ASME/ANSI A112.19.8 performance standard or any successor standard regulating such swimming pool or drain cover pursuant to section 1404(b) of the Act ( ‘‘Drain
Cover Standard ’’ ). In addition to the anti-entrapment devices or systems, each public pool and spa in the United States with a single main drain other than an unblockable drain is required to be equipped with one or more of the following devices and systems designed to prevent entrapment by pool or spa drains: Safety vacuum release system ( ‘‘ SVRS ’’ ); suction-limiting vent system; gravity drainage system; automatic pump shut-off system or drain disablement. The Pool and Spa Safety Act is designed to prevent the tragic and hidden hazard of drain entrapment and eviscerations in public pools and spas.

The CPSC staff will use a ‘‘Verification of Compliance Form ’’ to collect the information necessary to identify drain covers at pools and spas that do not meet the requirements of the ASME/ ANSI A112.19.8 performance standard or any successor standard regulating such swimming pool or spa drain cover. This compliance form may be viewed at http://www.regulations.gov, Docket No. CPSC–2009–0073, Supporting and Related Materials. CPSC investigators or designated State or local government


### 29521 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Notices

officials will use the form which will be filled out entirely at the site during the normal course of the pool and spa inspection. Using the form, the inspectors will collect information regarding the pool or spa facility; identify the type, location and features of the pool or spa; describe the drain covers, anti-entrapment device/systems, sump or equalizer lines at the site; and report on whether any actions are necessary to bring the pool or spa into compliance.

In the Federal Register of September 21, 2009, (74 FR 48064), the CPSC published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. Seven
comments were received. Several commenters suggested the time burden allotted for the pool operators to participate in the pool inspection was
insufficient.

Based on the public comments and CPSC staff’s experience inspecting 1,200 pools and spas, the estimated burden hours for pool operators have been
increased from 0.5 hours to 3.0 hours.

One commenter recommended that State or local officials use the proposed compliance form during the inspections to ensure consistency. In addition, the
commenter stated that CPSC staff should accept findings by State or local officials and not re-inspect the pool.

CPSC staff is working with State and local officials to avoid a duplication of effort regarding pool inspections. State and local officials are conducting a limited number of pool and spa inspections to determine if the requirements of the Pool and Spa Safety
Act have been met. CPSC staff will follow up with the pool owner or operator if corrective action is needed.

One commenter recommended an additional requirement for pool operators to state how the facility will monitor the security of the drain cover ( i.e., insure it stays fastened in place) and note the expiration date for the cover. Another commenter suggested that the pool operators provide
documentation that drain covers and/or SVRS were correctly installed.

CPSC staff is aware of the importance of ensuring the security of the drain cover, but those are policies for the facility to implement, and are not a part of the inspection. However, CPSC staff will request that the pool owner or operator provide the expiration date for the drain covers in the compliance form.

One commenter suggested that, in order to minimize the burden, an
electronic form should be used and the pool owners/operators should fill it out before the inspection. A few commenters requested additional questions, or the use of different terms in the compliance form.

The purpose of the compliance form is to ensure that the CPSC inspection and data collection procedures are completed by CPSC staff or the designated State or local government official. The compliance form is not intended to be filled out by the pool owner or operator. Based on the CPSC staff’s experience with the compliance form to date, the information obtained through the form adequately identifies drain covers at pools and spas that do not meet the requirements of ASME/ ANSI A112.19.8, and except for the inclusion of the expiration date of the drain cover, we will not otherwise revise the compliance form at this time.

One commenter recommended that CPSC partner with local departments of health, industry, or a non-profit so it can inspect a more representative sample of pools.

CPSC is contracting with State and local officials to conduct pool inspections that follow guidelines provided by CPSC for inspecting pools for compliance with the Pool and Spa Safety Act. The State and local officials can conduct the pool inspections when they do their regular visits to these pools. CPSC staff will follow up with the pool owner or operator if corrective
action is needed.

Burden Estimates: The CPSC staff estimates that there may be approximately 700 facilities inspected annually. Because the investigators will be talking to either the pool owner/ operator or pool staff at the time of the inspection and asking questions to help complete the form, the CPSC staff estimates that the burden hours for pool owners or pool staff to respond to the questions will be approximately 3 hours per inspection. Thus, the estimated total annual burden hours for respondents are approximately 2,100 hours (700 inspections × 3 hours per inspection). Although respondents may include either junior or senior pool staff, CPSC
staff based the annualized cost to respondents based on the compensation for management-level employees, since such employees may be the most knowledgeable of the pool or spa used.
The CPSC staff estimates that the annualized cost to all respondents is approximately $99,624 based on an hourly wage of $47.44 per hour ($47.44

× 2,100) (Bureau of Labor Statistics ( ‘‘ BLS ’’ ), December 2008, all workers, service, management, professional, and related).

The CPSC staff estimates that it will take an average of 2.5 hours to review
the information collected from the oral communications with pool owners/ operators or staff. The annual cost to the Federal government of the collection of information in these regulations is estimated to be $19,361. This is based on an average wage rate of $55.97 (the equivalent of a GS–14 Step 5 employee). This represents 70.1 percent of total compensation with an additional 29.9 percent coming from benefits (BLS, September 2008, percentage total benefits for all civilian management, professional, and related employees), or
$79.84 × 242.5 hours.

Dated: May 19, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010–12605 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6355–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Department of the Navy**

**Notice of Public Meetings of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for**  **Basing the U.S. Marine Corps Joint Strike Fighter F–35B on the East Coast** 

**AGENCY :**  Department of the Navy, DoD.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  Pursuant to Section (102)(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, and regulations implemented by the Council on Environmental Quality (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Parts 1500–1508), Department of Navy (DoN) NEPA regulations (32 CFR Part 775), and U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) NEPA directives (Marine Corps Order P5090.2A, changes 1 and 2), DoN has prepared and filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) that evaluates the potential environmental consequences that may result from the basing of the F–35B Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) on the East Coast of
the United States.

With the filing of the DEIS, DoN is initiating a 45-day public comment period and has scheduled five public comment meetings to receive oral and written comments on the DEIS. Federal, state, local agencies, and interested parties are encouraged to provide comments in person at any of the public comment meetings, or in writing anytime during the public comment period. This notice announces the date and location of the public meetings and provides supplementary information about the environmental planning effort.

**DATES :**  The DEIS will be distributed to Federal, State, and local agencies, elected officials, and other interested