alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
      knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of ANTs software
      inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter ended March 31,
      2006:





1.  Fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be
      deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any
      purpose whatsoever.







**Date:**    May
              15, 2006
            By:
            /s/
              Boyd Pearce**Boyd
              Pearce, Chief Executive Officer**






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the
      Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
      request.
# Iris Oifigiúil C 432I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | C 432I |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 6426 Deireadh Fómhair 2021 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

C 432I

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

6426 Deireadh Fómhair 2021

---

| Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Fógairtí |
| | NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN |
| | Institiúid Eorpach um Nuálaíocht agus Teicneolaíocht |
| 2021/C 432 I/01 | Glao ar Thograí maidir le Pobal Eolais agus Nuálaíochta de chuid na hInstitiúide Eorpaí um Nuálaíocht agus Teicneolaíocht a bhunú — Aitheantóir an Ghlao: HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

V   Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

Institiúid Eorpach um Nuálaíocht agus Teicneolaíocht

2021/C 432 I/01

Glao ar Thograí maidir le Pobal Eolais agus Nuálaíochta de chuid na hInstitiúide Eorpaí um Nuálaíocht agus Teicneolaíocht a bhunú — Aitheantóir an Ghlao: HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN

1

---

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

V Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

Institiúid Eorpach um Nuálaíocht agus Teicneolaíocht

| 26.10.2021 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | CI 432/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2021

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

CI 432/1

---

Glao ar Thograí maidir le Pobal Eolais agus Nuálaíochta de chuid na hInstitiúide Eorpaí um Nuálaíocht agus Teicneolaíocht a bhunú

Aitheantóir an Ghlao: HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN

(2021/C 432 I/01)

I gcomhréir le Rialachán (AE) 2021/819 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 20 Bealtaine 2021 maidir leis an Institiúid Eorpach um Nuálaíocht agus Teicneolaíocht (EIT), tugtar fógra leis seo gur seoladh glao ar thograí le haghaidh Phobal Eolais agus Nuálaíochta EIT (PEN) nua . Iarrtar tograí le haghaidh an ghlao seo a leanas.

Réimse tosaíochta bainteach leis an nglao: Earnálacha agus Tionscail an Chultúir agus na Cruthaitheachta

Tá spriocdháta an ghlao agus an fhaisnéis ábhartha uile faoi mhódúlachtaí an ghlao, mar aon leis na critéir mheastóireachta agus an treoir d’iarratasóirí maidir le conas tograí a chur isteach, le fáil i dtéacs an ghlao agus ar leathanach glao shuíomh gréasáin EIT:

https://eit.europa.eu/our-activities/call-for-eit-communities/2021

---
#### § 614.4550 Place of discount.

A Farm Credit Bank or agricultural credit bank may provide funding, discounting, or other similar financial assistance to any OFI applicant. However, a Farm Credit Bank or agricultural credit bank cannot fund, discount, or extend other similar financial assistance to an OFI that maintains its headquarters, or has more than 50 percent of its outstanding loan volume to eligible borrowers who conduct agricultural or aquatic operations in the chartered territory of another Farm Credit bank unless it notifies such bank in writing within five (5) business days of receiving the OFI's application for financing. Two or more Farm Credit banks cannot simultaneously fund the same OFI.

[69 FR 29863, May 26, 2004]
#### STATE OF MISSOURI, Appellant, v. A. E. MARTIN, Respondent.

Springfield Court of Appeals',

December 2, 1912.

CRIMINAL LAW: False Pretence: Obtaining Credit on Account: Information. Defendant was charged with obtaining credit on an account by giving the creditor an order on another party for an amount which defendant falsely represented was owing to him by the other party. *Held,*that this was not an offense under Sec. 4565, R. S. 1909, as the defendant did not obtain any property or thing of value, and that the demurrer to the information was properly sustained by the trial court.

Appeal from Howell Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *W. N. Evans,*Judge.

Affirmed.

*Will H. D. Green*for appellant.

*J. L. VanWormer*for respondent.

COX, J.

The prosecuting attorney filed an information charging defendant with the offense of obtaining property under false pretenses. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the information and the State appealed.

The information charges that defendant was indebted to the Kilpatrick Mercantile Co. in the sum of $109.35 and, in order to secure a credit of twenty dollars on this account, he falsely represented that one A. J. Rhodes was indebted to him in the sum of twenty dollars and defendant then gave to Kilpatrick Mercantile Co. an order upon Rhodes for twenty dollars and thereby induced the mercantile company to give him a credit of twenty dollars upon his account with them. Does this conduct on the part of defendant constitute a crime under the statute?

The statute, Sec. 4565, R. S. 1909, is as follows: “Every person who with intent to cheat or defraud any *347other shall designedly . . . by . . . false pretense obtain . . . from any person any money, personal property, right in action or other valuable thing or effects whatsoever . . . “shall be punished, etc. The question for our determination is whether obtaining credit on an account is obtaining property or thing of value. We do not think so. The entry by the mercantile company of a credit of twenty dollars on the account of defendant with them on their books did not operate as a payment, hence, defendant obtained nothing by the transaction, nor did the mercantile company part with any goods or property or anything of value. If Rhodes was not indebted to defendant and the order upon him by defendant was worthless for that reason, the parties were left in exactly the same condition after the transaction as before; and while the mercantile company got nothing out of it, they lost nothing and nothing of value was obtained from them by defendant. One of the essentials of this offense is that the party defrauded must have parted with something of value as a result of the false pretense or representation and since this element is wanting in the charge of this information, the demurrer thereto was properly sustained. [State v: Moore,. 15 la. 312; Moore v. Commonwealth. 8 Penn. St. 260.]

Judgment affirmed.

All concur.
Principal Interes Diario Semestre

8/9/2008 12/31/2008 $ 30,496,000.00 2.00% $ 1,694.22 $ 243,968.00

1/1/2009 6/30/2009 $ 30,739,968.00 0.50% $ 426.94 76,849.92

7/1/2009 12/31/2009 $ 30,816,817.92 0.50% $ 428.01 78,326.08

1/1/2010 6/30/2010 $ 30,895,144.00 0.50% $ 429.10 77,237.86

7/1/2010 12/31/2010 $ 30,972,381.86 0.50% $ 430.17 78,721.47

1/1/2011 6/30/2011 $ 31,051,103.33 0.50% $ 431.27 77,627.76

7/1/2011 12/31/2011 $ 31,128,731.09 0.50% $ 432.34 79,118.86

1/1/2012 6/30/2012 $ 31,207,849.95 0.50% $ 433.44 78,453.07

7/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 31,286,303.01 0.50% $ 434.53 79,519.35

1/1/2013 6/30/2013 $ 31,365,822.37 0.50% $ 435.64 78,414.56

7/1/2013 12/31/2013 $ 31,444,236.92 0.50% $ 436.73 79,920.77

1/1/2014 6/30/2014 $ 31,524,157.69 0.50% $ 437.84 78,810.39

7/1/2014 12/31/2014 $ 31,602,968.09 0.50% $ 438.93 80,324.21

1/1/2015 6/30/2015 $ 31,683,292.30 0.50% $ 440.05 79,208.23

7/1/2015 12/31/2015 $ 31,762,500.53 0.50% $ 441.15 80,729.69

1/1/2016 6/30/2016 $ 31,843,230.22 0.50% $ 442.27 80,050.34

7/1/2016 12/31/2016 $ 31,923,280.56 0.50% $ 443.38 81,138.34

1/1/2017 6/30/2017 $ 32,004,418.90 0.50% $ 444.51 80,011.05

7/1/2017 12/31/2017 $ 32,084,429.94 1.00% $ 891.23 163,095.85

1/1/2018 6/30/2018 $ 32,247,525.80 1.50% $ 1,343.65 241,856.44

7/1/2018 12/31/2018 $ 32,489,382.24 2.00% $ 1,804.97 330,308.72

1/1/2019 6/30/2019 $ 32,819,690.96 2.50% $ 2,279.15 410,246.14

7/1/2019 12/31/2019 $ 33,229,937.10 2.50% $ 2,307.63 422,297.12

1/1/2020 6/30/2020 $ 33,652,234.21 1.50% $ 1,402.18 253,793.93

7/1/2020 12/31/2020 $ 33,906,028.15 0.50% $ 470.92 86,177.82

1/1/2021 6/30/2021 $ 33,992,205.97 0.50% $ 472.11 84,980.51

7/1/2021 12/31/2021 $ 34,077,186.48 0.50% $ 473.29 86,612.85

1/1/2022 6/30/2022 $ 34,163,799.33 0.50% $ 474.50 85,409.50

7/1/2022 7/31/2022 $ 34,249,208.83 2.00% $ 1,902.73 57,082.01

8/1/2022 8/31/2022 $ 34,306,290.84 2.00% $ 1,905.91 57,177.15

9/1/2022 9/30/2022 $ 34,363,468.00 2.00% $ 1,909.08 55,363.37

Total Intereses $ 3,810,290.84

Total Principal + Intereses $ 34,306,290.84

Periodo

TABLA INTERES COMPUESTO

Interes

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22599-1 Filed:10/13/22 Entered:10/13/22 10:11:54 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

WILLIAM D. ABRAHAM

,

Appellant s

,

v.

RON ACTON, DEBBIE ACTON, AARK

INVESTMENTS LP, FEDERICO

FERNANDEZ AND CAROL

FERNANDEZ

,

Appellee s

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 2 2

- 00 0 79

- C V

Appeal from the

243rd District Cou r t

o f El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2016 DCV2081 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ee s ’ second motion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until March 1 , 202 3

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE THE APPELL EE S ’ BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jamie T. Wall

, the Appell ee s ’ attorney, prepare the

Appell ee s ’ brief and forward the same to this Court on or before March 1

, 202 3

.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 1 4 th day of February , 202 3

.

PER CURIAM

B efore Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto , JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
this schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Quipp, inc's
september 30, 1995 form 10-q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such 10-q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                            5382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6095
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       4498
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 17502
<PP&E>                                            1957
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   20351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             6077
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            16
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       12307
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     20351
<SALES>                                          16747
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 16747
<CGS>                                            11259
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    11259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3154
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2552
<INCOME-TAX>                                       951
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2552
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1601
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99
        

</TABLE>
42538.

#### ROUTHIER v. DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF GEORGIA, INC.

Hall, Judge.

1. The plaintiff sued the defendant to recover $710, the total amount of installment payments she had made on two lots in a real estate development, and appeals from a judgment in her favor for $275. The evidence showed that the plaintiff first made payments to Norris Lake Shores, Inc., of $435, and after the defendant acquired the unsold land in the development and other assets from Norris Lake Shores, Inc. the plaintiff made payments of $275 to the defendant. There was no evidence that the defendant received more than $275 or benefited in any other way from the payments made by the plaintiff. “The money, or its equivalent, must be received by the defendant or his agent, before he can be sued for money had and received.” *Lary v. Hart,*
      *7812 Ga. 422, 423; *Cowart v. Fender,*137 Ga. 586 (73 SE 822, AC 1913A 932); *King v. Forman,*71 Ga. App. 75, 77 (30 SE2d 214); *Carter v. Turbeville,*90 Ga. App. 367 (83 SE2d 72); *Dell v. Kugel,*99 Ga. App. 551, 559 (109 SE2d 532). The judgment of the trial court was not error.

*Felton, C. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*

Argued January 4, 1967

Decided January 20, 1967.

*Preston L. Holland,*for appellant.

*Smith, Cohen, Ringel, Kohler, Martin & Lowe, Donald A. Weissman,*for appellee.

2. The plaintiff’s enumeration of error on the admission of a document in evidence is not supported in the brief by citation of authority or argument and is deemed to have been abandoned. Rules of the Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia, effective August 1, 1965, Section VII, Rule 17 (c) (2).

*Judgment affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 21  Page 1 of 1

THOMAS GROUP, INC.  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

|SUBSIDIARY                                   |  | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
|-------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                                             |  |                              
|Thomas Group (Switzerland) GmbH              |  | Switzerland                  
|Thomas Group Swiss Results GmbH              |  | Switzerland                  
|Thomas Group of Louisiana, Inc.              |  | Delaware                     
|Thomas Group of Sweden, Inc.                 |  | Sweden                       
|Thomas Group Asia Pte. Ltd.                  |  | Singapore                    
|Thomas Group Hong Kong Limited               |  | Hong Kong                    
|Innovative Leadership Company Limited        |  | Hong Kong                    
|Thomas Group Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. |  | China                        

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.


SECTION
1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-


OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of ANTs software
inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for the period ended March 31,
2008:





1.           Fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certification is being provided
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is
it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.




Date:    May
      9, 2008/s/    Kenneth
      RuotoloKenneth
      Ruotolo, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the
Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request.
EXHIBIT H

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19996-5 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:00:13 Desc:

Exhibit H - Ana M. Arocho Sp Page 1 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19996-5 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:00:13 Desc:

Exhibit H - Ana M. Arocho Sp Page 2 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19996-5 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:00:13 Desc:

Exhibit H - Ana M. Arocho Sp Page 3 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19996-5 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:00:13 Desc:

Exhibit H - Ana M. Arocho Sp Page 4 of 5
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19996-5 Filed:02/02/22 Entered:02/02/22 18:00:13 Desc:

Exhibit H - Ana M. Arocho Sp Page 5 of 5
---

Exhibit 14

September 2004

CODE OF ETHICS

TurboSonic Technologies, Inc. expects all of its employees, including its
principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal
accounting officer, as well as the members of its board of directors, to act in
accordance with the highest standards of personal and professional integrity in
all aspects of their activities, to comply with all applicable laws, rules and
regulations, to deter wrongdoing and abide by other policies and procedures
adopted by TurboSonic that govern the conduct of its employees and directors.
This Code of Ethics is intended to supplement any other policies and procedures
adopted by TurboSonic.

You agree to:

1. Engage in and promote honest and ethical conduct, including
  the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between
  personal and professional relationships;
2. Take all reasonable measures to protect the confidentiality of
  non-public information about TurboSonic and its subsidiaries and their
  customers obtained or created in connection with your activities and to
  prevent the unauthorized disclosure of such information unless required by
  applicable law or regulation or legal or regulatory process;
3. Produce full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable
  disclosure in reports and documents that TurboSonic and its subsidiaries files
  with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and other
  regulators and in other public communications made by TurboSonic and its
  subsidiaries;
4. Comply with applicable governmental laws, rules and
  regulations, as well as the rules and regulations of self-regulatory
  organizations of which TurboSonic or its subsidiaries may be a member; and
5. Promptly report any possible violation of this Code of Ethics
  to the Chairman of TurboSonic's Audit Committee.

You are prohibited from directly or indirectly taking any action to
fraudulently influence, coerce, manipulate or mislead TurboSonic's or its
subsidiaries' independent public auditors for the purpose of rendering the
financial statements of TurboSonic or its subsidiaries misleading.

You understand that you will be held accountable for your adherence to this
Code of Ethics. Your failure to observe the terms of this Code of Ethics may
result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment.
Violations of this Code of Ethics may also constitute violations of law and may
result in civil and criminal penalties for you, your supervisors and/or
TurboSonic.

If you have any questions regarding the best course of action in a particular
situation, you should promptly contact the Chairman of TurboSonic's Audit
Committee. You may choose to remain anonymous in reporting any possible
violation of this Code of Ethics.

---
§ 381.1 Authority and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued pursuant to section 165(d)(8) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376, 1426-1427), as amended by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (Pub. L. 115-174, 132 Stat. 1296) (the *Dodd-Frank Act*), 12 U.S.C. 5365(d)(8), which requires the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) to jointly issue rules implementing the provisions of section 165(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act.
( b ) *Scope.* This part applies to each covered company and establishes rules and requirements regarding the submission and content of a resolution plan, as well as procedures for review by the Board and Corporation of a resolution plan.
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3232

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

AN ACT

To reauthorize certain school lunch and child nutrition 

programs through March 31, 2004.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3232 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION. 

2 (a) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN MILITARY HOUSING AL3 LOWANCES.—Section 9(b)(7) of the Richard B. Russell 

4 National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(b)(7)) is 

5 amended by inserting ‘‘and through March 31, 2004’’ 

6 after ‘‘and 2003’’. 

7 (b) CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM.—Sec8 tion 17(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Richard B. Russell National 

9 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1766(a)(2)(B)(i)) is amend10 ed by striking ‘‘September 30, 2003’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘March 31, 2004’’. 

12 (c) REIMBURSEMENT TO STATES UNDER COM13 MODITY DISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS.—Section 15(e) of the 

14 Commodity Distribution Reform Act and WIC Amend15 ments of 1987 (7 U.S.C. 612c note; Public Law 100–237) 

16 is amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 2003’’ and inserting 

17 ‘‘April 1, 2004’’. 

18 (d) FUNDING MAINTENANCE OF COMMODITY DIS19 TRIBUTION PROGRAMS.—Section 14(a) of the Richard B. 

20 Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1762a(a)) 

21 is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2003’’ and insert22 ing ‘‘March 31, 2004’’. 

23 (e) SUMMER FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM FOR CHIL24 DREN.—

25 (1) Section 13(q) of the Richard B. Russell Na26 tional School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1761(q)) is 
3

HR 3232 RFS 

1 amended by striking ‘‘the fiscal year beginning’’ and 

2 all that follows through ‘‘October 1, 2003’’ and in3 serting ‘‘the period beginning October 1, 1977, and 

4 ending March 31, 2004’’. 

5 (2) Section 18(f)(2) of the Richard B. Russell 

6 National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1769(f)(2)) 

7 is amended by striking ‘‘of fiscal years 2001 through 

8 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘beginning October 1, 2000, 

9 and ending March 31, 2004’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 28, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.