alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### EGU GHG NSPS **- Submittal #3** 

**RobertJ Wayland** to: Cortney_Higgins C : Kevin Culligan, Nick Hutson, fellner.christian, johnson.mary From: RobertJ W ayland/RTP/USEPA/US To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov Cc: Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Nick Hutson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, fellner.christian@epa.gov, johnson.mary@epa.gov Cortney - Attached below is information requested on examples of NSPS's in which we treated mods differently than greenfield sou rces. thanx! bob Robert J. W ayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243 - 01 RTP, NC 27711 Phone: (919) 541 - 1045 Cel l: (919) 306 -2290 Fax: (919) 541 - 5450

e - ma il: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt *********************************************************

----- For warded by Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US on 01/23/2012 12:29 PM ----- From: Susan Stahle/DC/USEPA/US To: Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 01/23/2012 12:07 PM Subject: Re: refineries question In the final refineries subpart Ja package we set different li mi ts for newly constructed and mo dified/reconstructed FCCUs. See pg 35,869 - 60.102a(b)(1)(i) and (ii).

Subparts J and Ja Final Rule FR Notice.pdfIn the final revisions package for subpart Ja (currently at OMB) we are setting different standard s for

newly constructed and modified/reconstructed process heaters. The latest package I have on that is attached. See regs starting on pg 195 - 60.102a(h)(2), especially the reg text that starts at the top of pg 200.

Subpart J -Ja final amendment package 101911 - clean version.doc Susan Stahle Air and Radiation Law Office (Rm 7502B) Office of General Counsel U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Penns yl vania Avenue, N W (ARN: MC 2344A) Washington, D.C. 20460 ph: (202) 564 - 1272 fax: (202) 564 - 560 3 stahle.susan@epa.gov
April 7, 1997




American National Bank and Trust
Company of Chicago, not personally
but as Trustee under Trust Agreement
dated April 24, 1987 and known
as Trust No. 102332-03
and
Evanston Plaza Investors A Real Estate Limited
Partnership ("Seller")
c/o The Balcor Company
Bannockburn Lake Office Plaza
2355 Waukegan Road
Suite A-200
Bannockburn, Illinois 60015
Attention:  Ilona Adams

Near North National Title Corporation ("Escrow Agent")
222 North LaSalle Street
First Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Attention: Lou Cohen

     Re:  Purchase Agreement dated March 18, 1997 (the "Purchase Agreement") 
          between Seller and Crosstown Asset Corp. I ("Purchaser") for Evanston
          Plaza, Evanston, Illinois

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Purchaser hereby terminates the Purchase Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1
thereof.  Attached is the required Due Diligence Termination Notice.  Escrow
Agent is hereby directed to return the earnest money together with all interest
accrued thereon to Purchaser in accordance with the attached wiring
instructions.

                              Sincerely,

                              CROSSTOWN ASSET CORP. I, a Delaware corporation


                              By:   /s/ Timothy Scott Clark
                                   ------------------------------------
                              Name:     Timothy Scott Clark
                                   ------------------------------------
                              Its:      Asst. Vice President
                                   ------------------------------------
<PAGE>
cc:  The Balcor Company
     Bannockburn Lake Office Plaza
     2355 Waukegan Road
     Suite A-200
     Bannockburn, Illinois 60015
     Attention:   James Mendelson

     Katten Muchin & Zavis
     525 West Monroe Street
     Suite 1600
     Chicago, Illinois 60661-3693
     Attention:  Daniel J. Perlman, Esq.



                       DUE DILIGENCE TERMINATION NOTICE

                                 April 7, 1997

     Crosstown Asset Corp.I, a Delaware corporation, as Purchaser under that
certain Agreement of Sale dated March 18, 1997, providing for the sale of
property located in Evanston, Illinois and known as Evanston Plaza has
terminated the Agreement of Sale pursuant  to Paragraph 7.1 thereof.

     The undersigned demands return of all earnest money deposited under the
Agreement of  Sale  pursuant to its right therein.


                              CROSSTOWN ASSET CORP. I, a Delaware
                              corporation


                              By:   /s/ Timothy Scott Clark
                                   -----------------------------------
                              Name:     Timothy Scott Clark
                                   -----------------------------------
                              Its:      Asst. Vice President
                                   -----------------------------------
<PAGE>
#### S. B. Hogan, H. K. Still, W. R. Minor, Being and Constituting the Board of Public Instruction of Hardee County, Florida, *Plaintiffs in*Error, v. State of Florida ex rel. G. W. Williams, W. M. Lowe, J. M. Hancock, Trustees of Gardner Special Tax School District, Hardee County, and H. C. Ketring, *Defendants in Error.*

Opinion Filed January 9, 1923.

1. Mandamus proceedings in the circuit court may be reviewed by the Supreme Court on a writ of error, but not on appeal, and evidence taken in such proceedings in the Circuit Court should be brought to the Supreme Court by means of bill of exceptions.

2. Where evidence taken in mandamus proceedings, brought to the Supreme Court for review by writ of error, is not contained in a bill of exceptions but there is reproduced in the transcript what purports to be a copy of the testim'ony, the pages containing it may, upon motion, be stricken.

A motion to strike portions of the transcript.

Motion granted.

*L. Grady Burton,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*W. W. Whitehurst,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

This is 'a proceeding in mandamus. It is brought to this- court by writ of error. After return to the alternative writ had been made an attorney was appointed by order of the court to take the testimony of witnesses and report same to the court. Pursuant to- this order testimony was taken as if it were a chancery cause. There is no bill *28of exceptions in the record but the record contains what purports to be a copy of the evidence. The motion to strike the pages of the record containing this evidence should be granted. ■ '

The motion to strike is granted.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne and West, J. J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000796486
<NAME> ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         163,599
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  199,340<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      16,294,211<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,592,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      9,384,508
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,298
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,973,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,592,536
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               672,719
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  612,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             198,392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (130,984)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (29,489)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (101,495)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (115,901)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.91)
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES NET OF ALLOWANCE
<F2>PP&E NET OF DEPRECIATION
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 605.501 Information Security Officer. ( a ) The Information Security Officer of the Farm Credit Administration shall be responsible for implementation and oversight of the information security program and procedures adopted by the Agency pursuant to the Executive order. This officer shall be the recipient of questions, suggestions, and complaints regarding all elements of this program and shall be solely responsible for changes to it and for the assurance that it is at all times consistent with the Executive order and ISOO directive.
( b ) The Information Security Officer shall be the Farm Credit Administration's official contact for requests for declassification of materials submitted under the Executive order, regardless of the point of origin of such requests, and shall assure that such requests for records in the Farm Credit Administration's possession that were originated by another agency shall be forwarded to the originating agency. The Farm Credit Administration shall include a copy of the records requested together with its recommendation for action. Upon receipt, the originating agency shall process the request in accordance with 32 CFR 2001.33(a)(2)(i). Upon request, the originating agency shall communicate its declassification determination to the Farm Credit Administration. The Farm Credit Administration shall inform the requester of the determination within 1 year from the date of receipt, except in unusual circumstances. If an appeal is made on a denial of a mandatory declassification review request, the originating agency's appellate authority shall normally make a determination within 30 working days following the receipt of an appeal. If additional time is required to make a determination, the originating appellate authority shall notify the requester of the additional time needed and provide the requester with the reason for extension. The originating agency's appellate authority shall notify the requester in writing of the final determination and of the reasons for any denial. Such officer shall also assure that requests for declassification submitted under the Freedom of Information Act are handled in accordance with that Act.
[49 FR 9859, Mar. 16, 1984, as amended at 71 FR 54900, Sept. 20, 2006]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000899717
<NAME> AMERICAN RESOURCES OF DELAWARE INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,180,638
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,969,202
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,949)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,569,374
<PP&E>                                      69,525,769
<DEPRECIATION>                            (18,276,276)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,565,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,752,488
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,181,819
<COMMON>                                           102
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,339,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,565,934
<SALES>                                     36,956,094
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,032,146
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,328,988
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,024,879
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,746,557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,039,065)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,192,474
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,846,591)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.21)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 24 (Friday, February 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 6301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Approval of Saybolt LP, as a Commercial Gauger

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of approval of Saybolt LP, as a commercial gauger.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, 
Saybolt LP, 4025 Oak Lane, Sulfur, LA 70665, has been approved to gauge 
petroleum, petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for 
customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. 
Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct gauger services should 
request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is 
approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the 
specific gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding 
the specific gauger service this entity is approved to perform may be 
directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 
344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d7b4b5a7f9bbb6b5bfa697b3bfa4f9b0b8a1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9cacbd987c5c8cbc1d8e9cdc1da87cec6df">[email protected]</span></a>. Please 
reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP 
approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.
    http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The approval of Saybolt LP, as commercial gauger became 
effective on June 11, 2008. The next triennial inspection date will be 
scheduled for June 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randall Breaux, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: January 29, 2009.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. E9-2503 Filed 2-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00364-CV

IN THE MATTER OF A.C., A JUVENILE

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 39503CR

ORDER

Appellant’s Motion to Supplement the Record on Appeal and to Hold the 

Briefing Schedule in Abeyance was filed on April 23, 2015. Appellant requests that we 

direct the Ellis County District Clerk to supplement the appellate record with 

documents referenced by the State in hearings held on October 15 and 16, 2014 and hold 

the briefing schedule in abeyance until a complete clerk’s record is filed.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c)(1) provides that “If a relevant item has 

been omitted from the clerk’s record, the trial court, the appellate court, or any party 

may by letter direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court 

a supplement containing the omitted item.” TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1). Furthermore, 
In the Matter of A.C. Page 2

“[a]ny supplemental clerk’s record will be part of the appellate record.” Id. at (c)(3). 

Based on appellant’s motion, it is clear that appellant has not yet made the 

specific request contemplated by Rule 34.5(a) and (b) for items to be included in the 

clerk’s record. Id. at (a) & (b). Furthermore, the Court is not in a position to determine 

if relevant items have been omitted from the clerk’s record nor adequately make a 

specific request to the trial court clerk as contemplated by Rule 34.5(c). In such a 

situation, the burden is on the appellant to make a specific request to the trial court 

clerk to supplement the record. To the extent the appellant’s motion asks this Court to 

order the trial court clerk to supplement the record, the motion is denied. 

To the extent the motion seeks an extension of time to file appellant’s brief until a 

“complete record is filed,” the motion is granted in part. The due date for appellant’s 

brief is extended 30 days from its current due date. This should be sufficient time to 

allow appellant to request the trial court clerk to supplement the record and the trial 

court clerk to file the supplemental record. Because this is an appeal in a juvenile 

proceeding, requests for additional time to file the record or appellant’s brief will be 

carefully scrutinized. 

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied in part, granted in part

Order issued and filed May 7, 2015
Editorial Note on Part 225
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 225 appear at 69 FR 77618, Dec. 28, 2004.

§ 225.64 Minimum appraisal standards. For federally related transactions, all appraisals shall, at a minimum: ( a ) Conform to generally accepted appraisal standards as evidenced by the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation, 1029 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20005, unless principles of safe and sound banking require compliance with stricter standards;
( b ) Be written and contain sufficient information and analysis to support the institution's decision to engage in the transaction;
( c ) Be subject to appropriate review for compliance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice;
( d ) Analyze and report appropriate deductions and discounts for proposed construction or renovation, partially leased buildings, non-market lease terms, and tract developments with unsold units;
( e ) Be based upon the definition of market value as set forth in this subpart; and
( f ) Be performed by State licensed or certified appraisers in accordance with requirements set forth in this subpart.
[Reg. Y, 59 FR 29501, June 7, 1994, as amended at 84 FR 53598, Oct. 8, 2019]
#### Alida B. Craig, Appellant, *v.*Mary Robinson, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Mew York, tenth district, borough of Manhattan.

McElheny *&*Bennett, for appellant.

J. E. Smith, for respondent.

*780
      *Per Curiam.*

It is not disputed that the defendant owes the plaintiff seventeen dollars and eighty-five cents. Indeed, the answer admits an indebtedness to this extent, and alleges a tender of the amount. The plea of tender is not, however, available to defendant as a defense because it does not appear that the tender was kept good. The plaintiff was clearly entitled, therefore, to recover at least the amount named, with interest. As there must be a new trial it is not necessary to pass upon any other question in the case further than to remark that the evidence would, in our opinion, have justified an even larger recovery.

Present: Tbttax, P. J., Scott and Dttgbo, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.
§ 390.420 Withdrawal or abandonment. ( a ) Any offering circular, amendment, or exhibit may be withdrawn prior to the effective date. A withdrawal shall be signed and state the grounds upon which it is made. Any document withdrawn will not be removed from the files of the FDIC, but will be marked “Withdrawn upon the request of the issuer on (date).”
( b ) When an offering circular or amendment has been on file with the FDIC for a period of nine months and has not become effective, the FDIC may, in its discretion, determine whether the filing has been abandoned, after notifying the issuer that the filing is out of date and must either be amended to comply with the applicable requirements of this subpart or be withdrawn within 30 days after the date of such notice. When a filing is abandoned, the filing will not be removed from the files of the FDIC, but will be marked “Declared abandoned by the FDIC on (date).”
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3404

To authorize the conveyance of the former Army Reserve Training Center 

in Wooster, Ohio. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2003

Mr. REGULA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To authorize the conveyance of the former Army Reserve 

Training Center in Wooster, Ohio.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER ARMY RESERVE 

4 TRAINING CENTER, WOOSTER, OHIO. 

5 (a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of 

6 the Army may convey, without consideration, to the City 

7 of Wooster, Ohio, all right, title, and interest of the United 

8 States in and to a parcel of real property, including im9 provements thereon, that is located at 1676 Portage Road, 
2

•HR 3404 IH 

1 Wooster, Ohio, and contains a former Army Reserve 

2 Training Center. 

3 (b) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage 

4 and legal description of the real property to be conveyed 

5 under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satis6 factory to the Secretary. The cost of the survey shall be 

7 borne by the City of Wooster, Ohio. 

8 (c) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The 

9 Secretary of the Army may require such additional terms 

10 and conditions in connection with the conveyance under 

11 subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to 

12 protect the interests of the United States.

Æ