Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-201-834]
 AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: On April 10, 2009, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary 
                        ( print page 52179)
                        results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on purified carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from Mexico. 
                        *See Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Mexico: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review*, 74 FR 16359 (April 10, 2009) (Preliminary Results). The review covers one producer/exporter, Quimica Amtex, S.A. de C.V. (Amtex). The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2007, through June 30, 2008. We invited interested parties to comment on our 
                        *Preliminary Results*. The Department received comments concerning our 
                        *Preliminary Results*
                         from respondents only. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made certain changes in the margin calculations. Therefore, the final results differ from the 
                        *Preliminary Results*. The final weighted-average dumping margin for the reviewed firm is listed below in the section entitled “Final Results of Review.”
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         October 9, 2009.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Flessner or Robert James, AD/CVD Operations Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6312 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 10, 2009, the Department published the preliminary results of this review in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . 
                    *See Preliminary Results*. We invited parties to comment on the 
                    *Preliminary Results*. Since the 
                    *Preliminary Results*, we received a case brief from respondent Amtex on May 11, 2009. No brief was received from petitioner, Aqualon Company (a division of Hercules Incorporated). Amtex originally reported as many as three entered values for some of its constructed export price (CEP) sales; these particular sales quantities had been blended from various lots of CMC held in Amtex USA's U.S. inventory. In order for the Department to calculate importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     assessment rates, we directed Amtex to report a single weighted entered value for each reported CEP sale in a supplemental questionnaire. 
                    *See*
                     “Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico: Supplemental Section C Questionnaire,” dated July 17, 2009. Amtex fully complied with this request in its “Quimica Amtex, S.A. de C.V. Supplemental Section C Questionnaire Response,” dated August 5, 2009. At our instruction, Amtex allocated its entered value to report a single weighted-average entered value for each CEP transaction. On August 5, 2009, the Department published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     an extension of the time limit for the final results until October 7, 2009. 
                    *See Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review*, 74 FR 39054 (August 5, 2009). Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is all purified carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), sometimes also referred to as purified sodium CMC, polyanionic cellulose, or cellulose gum, which is a white to off-white, non-toxic, odorless, biodegradable powder, comprising sodium CMC that has been refined and purified to a minimum assay of 90 percent. Purified CMC does not include unpurified or crude CMC, CMC Fluidized Polymer Suspensions, and CMC that is cross-linked through heat treatment. Purified CMC is CMC that has undergone one or more purification operations which, at a minimum, reduce the remaining salt and other by-product portion of the product to less than ten percent. The merchandise subject to this order is classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheading 3912.31.00. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made certain changes to the margin calculations. In its case brief, Amtex alleged that the Department had failed to make several conversions from pounds to kilograms for those sales originally invoiced in pounds. 
                    *See*
                     “Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico (A-201-834): Case Brief for the Final Results,” dated May 11, 2009, at pages 1-5. The comparison market database fields affected were inland freight charges (INLFTCH) and variable cost of manufacture (VCOMH). 
                    *Id*., at 1-4. The U.S. market database fields affected were variable cost of manufacture (VCOMU), total cost of manufacture (TCOMU), and packing (PACKU and PACK1U). 
                    *Id*., at 1-5. After analyzing the databases and the programming used in the 
                    *Preliminary Results*, we agreed with Amtex. Therefore, we added two lines of programming to the comparison market program stipulating that if the quantity unit reporting was in pounds, then the following adjustments to the comparison market program were appropriate: “INLFTCH = INLFTCH * 2.204” and “VCOMH = VCOMH * 2.204.” We also added three lines of programming to the U.S. market program stipulating that if the quantity unit reporting was in pounds, then the following adjustments to the U.S. market program were appropriate: “VCOMU = VCOMU * 2.204” and “TCOMU = TCOMU * 2.204” and “PACKU = PACK1U” (PACK1U reported the PACKU value as converted into kilograms). Final Results of Review The final weighted-average dumping margin for the period July 1, 2007, through June 30, 2008, is as follows: Producer/Exporter
Weighted-Average Margin 
                             (Percentage)Quimica Amtex, S.A. de C.V.
2.94
 Assessment The Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. We have calculated importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the sales. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review if any importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above 
                    *de minimis (i.e.*, less than 0.50 percent). The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. The Department clarified its “automatic assessment” regulation on May 6, 2003. 
                    *See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties*, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in these final results of review for which the reviewed companies did not know their merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation if there is no rate for the intermediate company or companies involved in the transaction. 
                    ( print page 52180) Cash Deposit Requirements Further, the following deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of purified carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) the cash deposit rates for the reviewed companies will be the rates shown above, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent, 
                    *de minimis*
                     within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), the cash deposit will be zero; (2) for previously-investigated or reviewed companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, or the LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and, (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 12.61 percent, the “all others” rate established in the LTFV investigation. 
                    *See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico*, 70 FR 28280 (May 17, 2005). These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility, under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This administrative review and notice are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: October 2, 2009. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary  for Import Administration.


[FR Doc. E9-24462 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S