alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 702
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 702 appear at 84 FR 1606, Feb. 5, 2019.

§ 702.305 NCUA action on capital plans. ( a ) *Timing* — ( 1 ) *Tier I & tier II credit unions.* NCUA will address any deficiencies in the capital plans submitted by tier I and tier II credit unions through the supervisory process.
( 2 ) *Tier III credit unions.* NCUA will notify tier III credit unions of the acceptance or rejection of their capital plans by August 31 of the year in which their plan is submitted.
( b ) *Grounds for rejection of capital plan.* NCUA may reject a capital plan if it determines that: ( 1 ) The covered credit union has material unresolved supervisory issues associated with its capital planning process;
( 2 ) The capital analysis underlying the covered credit union's capital plan, or the covered credit union's methodologies for reviewing the robustness of its capital adequacy, are not reasonable or appropriate;
( 3 ) Data utilized for the capital analysis is insufficiently detailed to capture the risks of the covered credit union, or the data lacks integrity;
( 4 ) The plan does not meet all of the requirements of § 702.304;
( 5 ) Unacceptable weakness in the capital plan or policy, the capital planning analysis, or any critical system or process supporting capital analysis;
( 6 ) The covered credit union's capital planning process constitutes an unsafe or unsound practice, or would violate any law, regulation, NCUA order, directive, or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, NCUA. In determining whether a capital plan would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice, NCUA considers whether the covered credit union is and would remain in sound financial condition after giving effect to the capital plan.
( c ) *Notification in writing.* NCUA will notify the credit union in writing of the reasons for a decision to reject a capital plan.
( d ) *Resubmission of a capital plan.* If NCUA rejects a tier III credit union's capital plan, the credit union must update and resubmit an acceptable capital plan to NCUA by November 30 of the year in which the credit union submitted its plan. The resubmitted capital plan must, at a minimum, address: ( 1 ) NCUA-noted deficiencies in the credit union's original capital plan or policy; and
( 2 ) Remediation plans for unresolved supervisory issues contributing to the rejection of the credit union's original capital plan.
( e ) *Supervisory actions.* Any tier III credit union operating without a capital plan accepted by NCUA may be subject to supervisory actions on the part of NCUA.
( f ) *Consultation on proposed action.* Before taking any action under this section on the capital plan of a federally insured, state-chartered credit union, NCUA will consult and work cooperatively with the appropriate State official.
[79 FR 24315, Apr. 30, 2014, as amended at 80 FR 48012, Aug. 11, 2015; 83 FR 17910, Apr. 25, 2018; 80 FR 66722, Oct. 29, 2015]
1 

### Ngo, Dan (FAA)

From: Brian Whiteside <brian.w hiteside@vdosglobal.us>

Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2016 2:22 PM

To: Ngo, Dan (FAA)

Cc: Seth Johnson

Subject: Re: Petition to Extend Exemption No. 11112B

Importance: High



### Yes, I confirm we need to extend our Exemption

Thank you for contacting us.

Brian

Brian Whiteside

President

VDOS Global LLC

vdosglobal.us

971.237.9698

Safety - Compliance - Experience

This email contains privileged and confidential information int ended for the use of the addressees named above. If you are not the

intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate it, copy it or take any action in resp ect of any

information contained in it. If you have received this E-mail in error please notify the sender immediately by the above conta ct

details and immediately destroy this E-mail and its attachments.

From: " Dan.Ngo@faa.gov " < Dan.Ngo@faa.gov >

Date: Thursday, December 8, 2016 at 11:16 AM

To: Brian Whiteside < brian.whiteside@vdosglobal.us >

Cc: Seth Johnson < seth.johnson@vdosglobal.us >

Subject: Petition to Extend Exemption No. 11112B

Mr. Whiteside,

Per our conversation this afternoon, my understanding is that VDOS would like to extend its exemption past the current

December 31, 2016 expiration. Due to a technical glitch, the request did not properly post to the docket.

Please confirm that an extension is indeed requested, and we will handle accordingly.

Regards,

Dan Ngo

Office of Rulemaking, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Federal Aviation Administration2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RODRIGO M. ALVARADO,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 311 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
From: Figler, Lyndsey M. [LFigler@tecoenergy.com]

Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 12:56 PM

To: Hofmeister, Art

Cc: Lukcic, David M.; Burrows, Byron T.

Subject: Response to Questions

Art, 

Please see the proposed language below for natural gas pipeline inspections. 

TEC proposes a monthly walk down of the natural gas pipeline. During this walk down TEC will 

check along the pipeline for leaks, by specifying if there are any odors related to methane.

Additionally, industry standard for patrol frequencies for natural gas transmission pipelines is every 

4.5 months or at least 4 times per year for buildings with four or more stories. This can be seen in 49 

CFR 192. The proposal from TEC is more rigorous than the current industry standard. Although, 

this standard is not applicable to this project, this is industry standard for similar pipelines.

Please see the response below regarding your question on the FPSC document regarding the Polk 2 

Combined Cycle Project.

The configuration currently approved and partially permitted for construction includes duct burners 

that will provide 120 MW of peak load capability. Alternative options to this approach (solar, solar 

hybrid, battery storage, etc.) will not feasibly be able to meet the timing criteria or scale of peaking 

capacity necessary and that the duct burners will provide. The prospect of future renewable 

resources meeting the needs of our customers has been evaluated and is currently not practicable as 

part of this project. As described in our PSC filing, TEC has incorporated provisions into the Polk 

2 Combined Cycle design to allow for future solar thermal integration, if deemed appropriate by the 

PSC in the future.

Feel free to contact me if needed either at my desk or on my cell phone,

Thank you,

Lyndsey Figler (Baldyga)

Environmental Health & Safety

Air Programs: Engineer I

Phone: 813-228-4740

Ext. 34740

Mobile: 813-309-0376

LFigler@tecoenergy.com
NOTICE: This email is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have 

received this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately, delete this email from your system and do not copy or disclose it to 

anyone else. Although we take precautions to protect against viruses, we advise you to take your own precautions to protect against viruses 

as we accept no liability for any which remain.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3141

To direct the Secretary of the Army to release to Clay County, Georgia, 

a reversionary interest of the United States requiring the non-profit 

operation of certain land as a retirement community, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2003

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Army to release to Clay 

County, Georgia, a reversionary interest of the United 

States requiring the non-profit operation of certain land 

as a retirement community, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3141 IH 

1 SECTION 1. RELEASE TO CLAY COUNTY, GEORGIA, OF RE2 VERSIONARY INTEREST REQUIRING NON3 PROFIT OPERATION OF CERTAIN LAND AS A 

4 RETIREMENT COMMUNITY. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec6 retary of the Army shall release by quitclaim deed to Clay 

7 County, Georgia, without reimbursement—

8 (1) the reversionary interest of the United 

9 States in approximately 50 acres of land lying in 

10 land lots 263 and 264, Seventh Land District, Clay 

11 County, Georgia, executed pursuant to section 204 

12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 

13 (104 Stat. 4632), requiring that the land be used 

14 and enjoyed solely for the development of a retire15 ment community and operated on a nonprofit basis; 

16 and 

17 (2) any other rights and interests of the United 

18 States in the land.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epolin, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



Dated:    July 11, 2008         By:  /s/ Greg Amato
                                    Greg Amato,
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)



Dated:    July 11, 2008         By:  /s/ James Ivchenko
                                    James Ivchenko,
                                    President
                                    (Principal Financial Officer)
## FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date . See Tex. R. App. P.35. If a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please adv ise the Clerk of the Court of Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be filed. Generally speaking, for good cause show n, the Court will grant no more than two extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a tot al period not to exceed 60 days in regular appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals. Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: (1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N (2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N If not , please provide the names and addresses of all other court reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the repor ter’s record be prepared or has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared? Y N
(4) Please select from the following options: A. The appellant has paid for the record. B. The appellant has made arrang ements to pay for the record C. The appellant is appealing as indigent. D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and is not appealing as indigent. (5) Extension ( fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment ) I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers _______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record. Additional Comments: ___________________________________________
Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number:

_______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________ 14-15-00005-CV CV0070560 ✔ 

### ✔

✔

/s/ Mary Kathryn Piper 600 59th Street, Suite 3303 Galveston, TX 77571 mary.piper@co.galveston.tx.us
§ 219.23 Recordkeeping and reporting requirements. ( a ) *Domestic and international funds transfers by insured depository institutions.* The Board and the Treasury are authorized to promulgate jointly recordkeeping and reporting requirements for domestic and international funds transfers by insured depository institutions whenever the agencies determine that the maintenance of such records has a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax, or regulatory investigations or proceedings. These regulations are codified at 31 CFR 1020.410(a). For the purposes of this subpart, the provisions of 31 CFR 1020.410(a) apply only to funds transfers by insured depository institutions.
( b ) *International transmittals of funds by financial institutions other than insured depository institutions.* The Board and the Treasury are required to promulgate jointly reporting and recordkeeping requirements for international transmittals of funds by financial institutions, including brokers and dealers in securities and businesses that provide money transmitting services. In prescribing these requirements, the Board and the Treasury take into account the usefulness of these records in criminal, tax, or regulatory investigations or proceedings and the effect the recordkeeping will have on the cost and efficiency of the payment system. These regulations are codified at 31 CFR 1010.410(e). For the purposes of this subpart, the provisions of 31 CFR 1010.410(e) apply only to international transmittals of funds.
[60 FR 233, Jan. 3, 1995, as amended by Reg. S, 77 FR 65098, Oct. 25, 2012]
§ 5.42 Corporate title of a national bank or Federal savings association. ( a ) *Authority.* 12 U.S.C. 21a, 30, 93a, 1462a, 1463, 1464, 1467a, 2901 *et. seq.* and, 5412(b)(2)(B).
( b ) *Scope.* This section describes the method by which a national bank or Federal savings association may change its corporate title.
( c ) *Standards.* ( 1 ) A national bank or Federal savings association may change its corporate title provided that the new title complies with applicable laws, including 18 U.S.C. 709, regarding false advertising and the misuse of names to indicate a Federal agency, and any applicable OCC guidance.
( 2 ) For a national bank, the new title must include the word “national.”
( d ) *Procedures* — ( 1 ) *Notice process.* A national bank or Federal savings association must promptly notify the appropriate OCC licensing office if it changes its corporate title. The notice must contain the old and new titles and the effective date of the change.
( 2 ) *Amendment to articles of association.* A national bank whose corporate title is specified in its articles of association must amend its articles, in accordance with the procedures of 12 U.S.C. 21a, to change its title.
( 3 ) *Amendment to charter.* A Federal savings association must amend its charter in accordance with § 5.21 or § 5.22, as applicable, to change its title.
( 4 ) *Exceptions to rules of general applicability.* Sections 5.8, 5.9, 5.10, 5.11, and 5.13 do not apply to a national bank or Federal savings association's change of corporate title. However, if the OCC concludes that the notice presents a significant or novel policy, supervisory, or legal issue, the OCC may determine that any or all parts of §§ 5.8, 5.9, 5.10, 5.11, and 5.13 apply.
[80 FR 28453, May 18, 2015, as amended at 85 FR 80462, Dec. 11, 2020]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3310 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3310

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the depreciation 
                   recovery period for roof systems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 16, 2003

 Mr. Foley (for himself, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mr. Nussle, Mr. Hayworth, 
  Mr. Manzullo, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Weller, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. 
 Davis of Alabama, Mr. English, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Putnam, and 
 Mr. McKeon) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the depreciation 
                   recovery period for roof systems.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Realistic Roofing Tax Treatment Act 
of 2003''.

SEC. 2. DEPRECIATION RECOVERY PERIOD FOR ROOF SYSTEMS.

    (a) 20-Year Recovery Period.--Paragraph (3) of section 168(e) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to classification of 
certain property) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(F) 20-year property.--The term `20-year 
                property' includes any roof system.''.
    (b) Requirement To Use Straight Line Method.--Paragraph (3) of 
section 168(b) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph:
                    ``(G) Any roof system.''.
    (c) Alternative System.--The table contained in section 
168(g)(3)(B) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following 
new item:

  ``(F)..............................................       20''.      
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3240

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

to designate the La Entrada al Pacifico Corridor in the State of Texas 

as a high priority corridor on the National Highway System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 2, 2003

Mr. NEUGEBAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 

Act of 1991 to designate the La Entrada al Pacifico 

Corridor in the State of Texas as a high priority corridor 

on the National Highway System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LA ENTRADA AL PACIFICO CORRIDOR, TEXAS. 

4 Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor5 tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2032) is amended 

6 by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(45) In the State of Texas, the La Entrada al 

8 Pacifico Corridor consisting of the following high-
2

•HR 3240 IH 

1 ways and any portion of a highway in a corridor on 

2 2 miles of either side of the center line of the high3 way—

4 ‘‘(A) State Route 349 from Lamesa to the 

5 point on that highway that is closest to 32 de6 grees, 7 minutes, north latitude, by 102 de7 grees, 6 minutes, west longitude; 

8 ‘‘(B) the segment or any roadway extend9 ing from the point described by subparagraph 

10 (A) to the point on Farm-to-Market Road 1788 

11 closest to 32 degrees, 0 minutes, north latitude, 

12 by 102 degrees, 16 minutes, west longitude; 

13 ‘‘(C) Farm-to-Market Road 1788 from the 

14 point described by subparagraph (B) to its 

15 intersection with Interstate Route 20; 

16 ‘‘(D) Interstate Route 20 from its intersec17 tion with Farm-to-Market Road 1788 to its 

18 intersection with United States Route 385; 

19 ‘‘(E) United States Route 385 from Odes20 sa to Fort Stockton, including those portions 

21 that parallel United States Route 67 and Inter22 state Route 10; and 

23 ‘‘(F) United States Route 67 from Fort 

24 Stockton to Presidio, including those portions 
3

•HR 3240 IH 

1 that parallel Interstate Route 10 and United 

2 States Route 90.’’.

Æ
# Euroopan unionin C 432I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 432I |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 64. vuosikerta26. lokakuuta 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 432I

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

64. vuosikerta26. lokakuuta 2021

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Ilmoitukset |
| | HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT |
| | Euroopan innovaatio- ja teknologiainstituutti |
| 2021/C 432 I/01 | Euroopan innovaatio- ja teknologiainstituutin (EIT) osaamis- ja innovointiyhteisön perustamista koskeva ehdotuspyyntö – Ehdotuspyynnön tunnus: HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

V   Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan innovaatio- ja teknologiainstituutti

2021/C 432 I/01

Euroopan innovaatio- ja teknologiainstituutin (EIT) osaamis- ja innovointiyhteisön perustamista koskeva ehdotuspyyntö – Ehdotuspyynnön tunnus: HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

V Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan innovaatio- ja teknologiainstituutti

| 26.10.2021 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CI 432/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2021

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CI 432/1

---

Euroopan innovaatio- ja teknologiainstituutin (EIT) osaamis- ja innovointiyhteisön perustamista koskeva ehdotuspyyntö

Ehdotuspyynnön tunnus: HORIZON-EIT-2021-KIC-DESIGN

(2021/C 432 I/01)

Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston 20 päivänä toukokuuta 2021 antaman asetuksen (EU) N:o 2021/819 mukaisesti ilmoitetaan Euroopan innovaatio- ja teknologiainstituutin (EIT) uutta osaamis- ja innovaatioyhteisöä (KIC) koskevasta ehdotuspyynnöstä. Pyyntöä varten toivotaan ehdotuksia.

Ehdotuspyynnön ensisijaisesti kattamat alueet ovat kulttuuri- ja luovat alat

Ehdotuspyynnön määräaika ja kaikki muut tiedot ehdotuspyyntöjä koskevista säännöistä ja arviointikriteereistä sekä ohjeet ehdotusten jättämiseen ovat saatavilla ehdotuspyynnön tekstissä ja EIT:n verkkosivuston ehdotuspyyntöjä koskevalla sivulla osoitteessa

https://eit.europa.eu/our-activities/call-for-eit-communities/2021

---
§ 261a.8 Request for amendment of record. ( a ) *Procedures for making request.* ( 1 ) If you wish to amend a record that pertains to you in a system of records, you may submit the request in writing to the Secretary of the Board (or to the Inspector General for records in a system of records maintained by the OIG) in an envelope clearly marked “Privacy Act Amendment Request.”
( 2 ) Your request for amendment of a record must— ( i ) Identify the system of records containing the record for which amendment is requested;
( ii ) Specify the portion of that record requested to be amended; and
( iii ) Describe the nature of and reasons for each requested amendment.
( 3 ) We will require you to verify your identity under the procedures set forth in § 261a.5(c) of this part, unless you have already done so in a related request for access or amendment.
( b ) *Burden of proof.* Your request for amendment of a record must tell us why you believe the record is not accurate, relevant, timely, or complete. You have the burden of proof for demonstrating the appropriateness of the requested amendment, and you must provide relevant and convincing evidence in support of your request.