alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐x 

In re:                  PROMESA  

                  Title III 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND  

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

  as representative of            No. 17 BK 3283‐LTS  

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al.,                 (Jointly Administered) 

      Debtors.1  

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐x 

ORDER 

  This matter is before the Court on the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico’s 

Urgent Motion for Extension of Time to Oppose Rule 2004 Motion and Notice of Hearing by 

National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation (Dkt. No. 2276) (the “Urgent Motion”).  National 

Public Finance Guarantee Corporation shall file a response, if any, to the Urgent Motion by 

Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 1:00 p.m. AST (12:00 p.m. EST).  The Court will thereafter take 

the Urgent Motion on submission.   

SO ORDERED.          / s / Judith Gail Dein               

Judith Gail Dein 

DATED: January 24, 2018        United States Magistrate Judge  

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the 

last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284‐LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 

(“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees 

Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 17 BK 3566‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power 

Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747) 

(Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations). 

   

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2279 Filed:01/24/18 Entered:01/24/18 13:39:32 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### MYGATT *v.*INGHAM.

Appeal quashed — bond filed in blank for the condition, not good — admission of surety cannot makes it good.

To perfect an appeal a bond conditioned as the law directs must be filed within thirty days after of the close of judgment term of the court below, no agreement of the parties or of securities can supply the place of such bond.

Where a bond with penal part written out, and with blank paper above the seal, was filed to perfect an appeal, and a condition written afterwards and after the expiration of the thirty days allowed for the appeal, held that said instrument does appeal the cause, even though the security appear in court did admit the obligation of the bond.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas.

*Wilcox,*for the appellee,

moved to quash the appeal in this case, because no legal bond has been given on the appeal.

O. *Parish,*eontra,

contendéd that the bond was valid.

By the Court.

It is agreed that the appellant in this case with- . in the time prescribed by law, entered into a single bill or bond of an amount more than double the judgment below. Afterwards, and before this court, the condition, now annexed to the bond, was written within a blank space left above the signature and seal. The law requires an appeal bond, conditioned as prescribed, to be *executed and filed*within thirty days after the judgment. No bond with such condition was filed in this case within that time. But the obligor of this bond, who is now here in court, *admits*that this bond shall bind him. This admission cannot affect the question. It is a compliance with the law alone that makes a valid appeal, not the agreement of parties, much less that of strangers.

The appeal is quashed, being improvidently entered.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3353 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3353

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 525 Main Street in Tarboro, North Carolina, as the ``George Henry 
                     White Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3353

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 525 Main Street in Tarboro, North Carolina, as the ``George Henry 
                     White Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 525 
Main Street in Tarboro, North Carolina, shall be known and designated 
as the ``George Henry White Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George Henry White Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
P.1 

OAR Box 1878 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

139) ll-B-52 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 11/28/2008 1:21:26 PM Sheet 139 of 145 
P.2 

A-90-19 

ll-B-52 

PENDING CONFIDENTIAL ETFj f 

W 

i2M/R DOCKET 

The following information is located in the confidential 

files of the Director, Emission Standards Division, Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711. This 

information is confidential pending final determination by the 

Administrator and is not available for public inspection. 

W. Floyd, Radian Corporation, to Process Vents Docket 

A-90-19, December 1990, HON NESHAP: Industry 

Characteristics/Ethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether. 56 pages. 

CBI Document Control No. 86/23, PPS-52.
# RECEIVED U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

## JUN 232015 WASHINGTON, DC

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, } 

### Complainant, } } V. } } FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY, LLC, } 

### Respondent. } 

## HEARING DOCKET

Inthe Matter ofFisher Scientific Company, LLC DocketNo. FAA-2015-1321 (Civil Penalty Action) Judge Goodwin

REQUEST TO CORRECT SERVICE LIST

OnJune 11,2015, the ChiefAdministrative Law Judge issued a Notice ofAssignment of Proceeding. The Notice included a service list that includedthe following:
President Fisher Scientific Company, LLC 6722 Bickmore Ave. Chino, CA 91708
Over the course ofnearly four years, FAAhas repeatedly been informedthatthere is no "President" ofFisher Scientific Co. in Chino, CA. FAA also has been informed that Respondent Fisher Scientific Company, LLC, a subsidiary ofThermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as "Fisher") is represented by the counsel identified below and that any related materials should be served on counsel. Accordingly, there is no reason to include the Chino address in the service list for the above-captioned case or for any Goverrnnent entity to expend public resources to serve materials there.

### WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests that the abovementioned address in Chino, CA, be removed from the Service List inthis case.

Dated: June 23, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

Vienna, VA 22180 (email)

**JCmc~l)f>olomacstrategyasscJC!ales.•~om** 

### (tel) 703-757-5866 Counsel for Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., and Fisher Scientific Co., LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### On June 23, 2015, the undersigned sent by air 

### courier one copy ofthe foregoing Request to correct Service Listto each ofthe persons listed below. [One Copy] William Vines, Esq. Regional Counsel, ASO-7 U.S. Department ofTransportation Federal Aviation Administration SouthernRegion 1701 ColumbiaAve. College Park, GA 30337 [One Copy] The Hon. Richard C. Goodwin Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave., S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 [Original and One Copy] Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Federal Aviation Administration Wilbur Wright Bldg., Suite 2W1000 600 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591
#### § 619.9260 Primary security.

The basic collateral securing the loan.
#### T. C. PARKER RAILWAY NEWS CO. V. CLEANEY.

(Decided April *17,*1913.)

Appeal from Coosa Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. A. H. Alston. .

Lackey & Bridges, for appellant. Riddle, Ellis, Riddle & Pruet, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Affirmed for want of assignment of errors.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Notice is hereby given that Telegraph Hill Partners SBIC, L.P., 360 Post Street, Suite 601, San Francisco, CA 94108, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Telegraph Hill Partners SBIC, L.P. proposes to provide equity security financing to AltheaDx, Inc., 3550 Dunhill Street, San Diego, CA 92121. The financing is contemplated for working capital and general corporate purposes.

                    The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Telegraph Hill Partners II, L.P., THP II Affiliates Fund, L.P., and THP Affiliates Fund, L.P., all Associates of Telegraph Hill Partners                           ( print page 52993)                        SBIC, L.P., own more than ten percent of AltheaDx, Inc.                

Therefore, this transaction is considered a financing of an Associate requiring an exemption. Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

Dated: September 24, 2009.

Sean J. Greene,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. E9-24844 Filed 10-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# C_2018170EN.01000601.xml

| 17.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/6

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2018/C 170/04)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 22 February 2018 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 81568 |
| Decision No | : | 027/18/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Region | : |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | NOx tax exemption for 2018-2025 |
| Legal basis | : | NOx Agreement 2018-2025 |
| Type of measure | : | Scheme |
| Objective | : | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | : | Tax exemption |
| Budget | : | NOK 14 billion |
| Intensity | : |
| Duration | : | 2018-2025 |
| Economic sectors | : | All undertakings subject to NOx tax |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment |
| PO Box 8013 Dep |
| N-0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

22 February 2018

Case No

Case No

:

81568

Decision No

Decision No

:

027/18/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Region

Region

:

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

NOx tax exemption for 2018-2025

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

NOx Agreement 2018-2025

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Scheme

Objective

Objective

:

Environmental protection

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Tax exemption

Budget

Budget

:

NOK 14 billion

Intensity

Intensity

:

Duration

Duration

:

2018-2025

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

All undertakings subject to NOx tax

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment

PO Box 8013 Dep

N-0030 Oslo

NORWAY

Other information

Other information

:

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
# Amtsblatt C 402I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 402I |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 64. Jahrgang5. Oktober 2021 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 402I

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

64. Jahrgang5. Oktober 2021

---

| Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informationen |
| | INFORMATIONEN DER ORGANE, EINRICHTUNGEN UND SONSTIGEN STELLEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION |
| | Rechnungshof |
| 2021/C 402 I/01 | Stellungnahme Nr. 2/2021: zu dem Vorschlag der Kommission für eine Verordnung des Rates zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU, Euratom) Nr. 609/2014, um die Vorhersehbarkeit für die Mitgliedstaaten zu verbessern und die Verfahren für die Streitbeilegung bei der Bereitstellung der traditionellen, der MwSt.- und der BNE-Eigenmittel zu klären (COM (2021) 327 final vom 25. Juni 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE)) | 1 |

Inhalt

Seite

IV   Informationen

INFORMATIONEN DER ORGANE, EINRICHTUNGEN UND SONSTIGEN STELLEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION

Rechnungshof

2021/C 402 I/01

Stellungnahme Nr. 2/2021: zu dem Vorschlag der Kommission für eine Verordnung des Rates zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU, Euratom) Nr. 609/2014, um die Vorhersehbarkeit für die Mitgliedstaaten zu verbessern und die Verfahren für die Streitbeilegung bei der Bereitstellung der traditionellen, der MwSt.- und der BNE-Eigenmittel zu klären (COM (2021) 327 final vom 25. Juni 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE))

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

IV Informationen

INFORMATIONEN DER ORGANE, EINRICHTUNGEN UND SONSTIGEN STELLEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION

Rechnungshof

| 5.10.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CI 402/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CI 402/1

---

Stellungnahme Nr. 2/2021:

zu dem Vorschlag der Kommission für eine Verordnung des Rates zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU, Euratom) Nr. 609/2014, um die Vorhersehbarkeit für die Mitgliedstaaten zu verbessern und die Verfahren für die Streitbeilegung bei der Bereitstellung der traditionellen, der MwSt.- und der BNE-Eigenmittel zu klären (COM (2021) 327 final vom 25. Juni 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE))

(2021/C 402 I/01)

Der Europäische Rechnungshof teilt mit, dass die Stellungnahme Nr. 2/2021 zu dem Vorschlag der Kommission für eine Verordnung des Rates zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU, Euratom) Nr. 609/2014, um die Vorhersehbarkeit für die Mitgliedstaaten zu verbessern und die Verfahren für die Streitbeilegung bei der Bereitstellung der traditionellen, der MwSt.- und der BNE-Eigenmittel zu klären (COM (2021) 327 final vom 25. Juni 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE)), soeben veröffentlicht wurde.

Die Stellungnahme kann ab dem 5. Oktober 2021 um 17.00 Uhr auf der Website des Europäischen Rechnungshofs aufgerufen bzw. von dort heruntergeladen werden:

https://www.eca.europa.eu/de/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=59435

---
122o45ʼ 122o30ʼ 122o15ʼ

38o15ʼ

38o30ʼ

PRELIMINARY ISOSTATIC GRAVITY MAP OF THE SONOMA VOLCANIC FIELD AND VICINITY, 

SONOMA AND NAPA COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA

SCALE 1:100,000 

2 0 2 4 6 Miles

2 0 2 4 6 Kilometers 

V.E. Langenheim, C.W. Roberts, C.A. McCabe, D.K. McPhee, J.E. Tilden, and R.C. Jachens

2006

Previously published (Chapman and Bishop, 1974;

Youngs and others, 1985))

Chevron (Smith, 1992)

U.S. Geological Survey 1990-2005

Gravity anomaly contours. Contour

interval, 2 mGal. Hachures indicate 

gravity low. Contours were computergenerated based on a 300-m grid.

Although the data have been edited,

caution should be exercised when

interpreting anomalies controlled by

only a single gravity station.

GRAVITY EXPLANATION

STATION LOCATIONS

California Index Map

Study Area

San Pablo

Bay

Sonoma

Valley

Napa Valley

0 10KM Vallejo

San

Andreas fault

Rodgers Creek fault 

Calistoga

Petaluma

Santa 

Rosa Plain

West Napa fault

Maacama fault 

122 ̊45 ́ 122 ̊30 ́ 122 ̊15 ́

38 ̊15 ́

38 ̊30 ́

Napa

Santa 

Rosa

Pre-Cenozoic rocks

Cenozoic volcanics

dashed brown line 

is extent of Sonoma

volcanic field

Cenozoic sedimentary

rocks

Figure 1. Simplfied geologic map of the study area. Dashed brow

line, extent of Sonoma volcanic field.
§ 252.42 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart E, the following definitions apply: *Advanced approaches* means the risk-weighted assets calculation methodologies at 12 CFR part 217, subpart E, as applicable, and any successor regulation.
*Baseline scenario* means a set of conditions that affect the U.S. economy or the financial condition of a covered company and that reflect the consensus views of the economic and financial outlook.
*Covered company* means: ( 1 ) A U.S. bank holding company with average total consolidated assets of $100 billion or more;
( 2 ) A U.S. intermediate holding company subject to this section pursuant to § 252.153; and
( 3 ) A nonbank financial company supervised by the Board.
*Foreign banking organization* has the same meaning as in 12 CFR 211.21(o).
*Pre-provision net revenue* means the sum of net interest income and non-interest income less expenses before adjusting for loss provisions.
*Planning horizon* means the period of at least nine consecutive quarters, beginning on the first day of a stress test cycle over which the relevant projections extend.
*Provision for credit losses* means: ( 1 ) With respect to a covered company that has adopted the current expected credit losses methodology under GAAP, the provision for credit losses, as would be reported by the covered company on the FR Y-9C in the current stress test cycle; and,
( 2 ) With respect to a covered company that has not adopted the current expected credit losses methodology under GAAP, the provision for loan and lease losses as would be reported by the covered company on the FR Y-9C in the current stress test cycle.
*Regulatory capital ratio* means a capital ratio for which the Board has established minimum requirements for the company by regulation or order, including, as applicable, the company's regulatory capital ratios calculated under 12 CFR part 217 and the deductions required under 12 CFR 248.12; except that the company shall not use the advanced approaches to calculate its regulatory capital ratios.
*Scenarios* are those sets of conditions that affect the U.S. economy or the financial condition of a covered company that the Board determines are appropriate for use in the supervisory stress tests, including, but not limited to, baseline and severely adverse scenarios.
*Severely adverse scenario* means a set of conditions that affect the U.S. economy or the financial condition of a covered company and that overall are significantly more severe than those associated with the baseline scenario and may include trading or other additional components.
*Stress test cycle* means the period beginning on January 1 of a calendar year and ending on December 31 of that year.
*Subsidiary* has the same meaning as in 12 CFR 225.2.
[84 FR 59106, Nov. 1, 2019]
#### § 408.7 Environmental information.

Interested persons may contact the General Counsel regarding Eximbank's compliance with NEPA.
#### AUTOQUIP MFG. CO. v. UNITED STATES

[68 C. Cls. 362; 281 U. S. 764]

Petition for writ of certiorari was *denied*by the Supreme Court June 2, 1930.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22853 Filed:11/10/22 Entered:11/14/22 11:00:25 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22853 Filed:11/10/22 Entered:11/14/22 11:00:25 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22853 Filed:11/10/22 Entered:11/14/22 11:00:25 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22853 Filed:11/10/22 Entered:11/14/22 11:00:25 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22853 Filed:11/10/22 Entered:11/14/22 11:00:25 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 6
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22853 Filed:11/10/22 Entered:11/14/22 11:00:25 Desc: Main

Document Page 6 of 6
#### Ina J. Norwood, *Appellant,*v. Russell M. Norwood, *Appellee.*

Decision Filed June 11, 1923.

Petition for Rehearing Denied July 6, 1923.

' An Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Lucie County; E. C. Davis, Judge.

*E. P. Martin,*for Appellant;

*L. B. Newman,*for Appellee.

'Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court *510that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

All concur.
§ 324.155 Equity derivative contracts. ( a ) Under the IMA, in addition to holding risk-based capital against an equity derivative contract under this part, an FDIC-supervised institution must hold risk-based capital against the counterparty credit risk in the equity derivative contract by also treating the equity derivative contract as a wholesale exposure and computing a supplemental risk-weighted asset amount for the contract under § 324.132.
( b ) Under the SRWA, an FDIC-supervised institution may choose not to hold risk-based capital against the counterparty credit risk of equity derivative contracts, as long as it does so for all such contracts. Where the equity derivative contracts are subject to a qualified master netting agreement, an FDIC-supervised institution using the SRWA must either include all or exclude all of the contracts from any measure used to determine counterparty credit risk exposure.