alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
217/ 782-3397

September 18, 2015

Dr. Susan Hedman

U.S. Regional Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region V (R-19J)

77 West Jackson Boulevard

Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507

Dear Dr. Hedman:

On behalf of Governor Rauner, in response to the March 20, 2015, letter from U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Acting Assistant Administrator Janet G. McCabe

to the Illinois EPA, which seeks “updated recommendations” for the next round of area 

designations under the revised sulfur dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

(NAAQS), I submit the following attainment and nonattainment recommendations for the State 

of Illinois. These recommendations are specific to the areas surrounding the five Illinois power 

plants listed in the March letter. Included with these recommendations is supporting 

documentation. This documentation is also being provided to your staff in electronic format to 

facilitate a timely review. 

The following designations are recommended for the listed power plants in Illinois:

Facility (Location) Designation Areal Extent of Designation 

Recommendation

Newton Power Station

(Jasper County) Attainment Jasper County

Hennepin Power Station

(Putnam County) Attainment Putnam County, Bureau County

Joppa Steam Coal Power Plant 

(Massac County) Attainment Massac County

Marion Power Station

(Williamson County) Attainment Williamson County

Wood River Power Station

(Madison County)

Nonattainment

Attainment

Unclassifiable

Area east of Corporal Belchik Memorial 

Expressway, south of East Broadway, 

south of Route 3, and north of 

Route 143 in Alton Township.

All of Wood River Township, and the 

area north of Cahokia Diversion 

Channel in Chouteau Township.

Remainder of Madison County.
Illinois EPA recommends that only that portion of Madison County in Alton Township that is 

east of the Corporal Belchik Memorial Expressway, south of East Broadway, south of Route 3, 

and north of Route 143 be designated as nonattainment for the 2010 primary 1-hour SO2

NAAQS. A modeling analysis of facilities whose SO2 emissions impact this area has shown 

modeled violations of the 2010 SO2 standard.

If there are questions or comments regarding this matter, please feel free to contact David 

Bloomberg, Manager Air Quality Monitoring and Planning at 217-524-4949 or me.

Sincerely,

Lisa Bonnett, Director

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Attachments
bcc: Julie Armitage, Bureau Chief

David Bloomberg, AQPS Manager
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52819-52820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24792]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (09-090)]


NASA Advisory Council; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council. The 
agenda topics for the meeting will include:
    <bullet> NASA Administrator Update.
    <bullet> NASA Ames Research Center Update.
    <bullet> Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee.
    <bullet> Scientific Update from LCROSS and KEPLER Missions.
    <bullet> Green Building Initiative at ARC.

DATES: Thursday, October 29, 2009, 1 p.m.-4 p.m. (Western).

[[Page 52820]]


ADDRESSES: NASA Ames Conference Center (Building 3), Room: Ballroom, 
500 Severyns Avenue, NASA Research Park, NASA Ames Research Center 
(ARC), Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Marla King, NAC Administrative 
Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters, 
Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-1148.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. It is imperative that the meeting be 
held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key 
participants. Visitors will need to show a valid picture identification 
such as driver's license to enter into the NASA Research Park, and must 
state they are attending the NASA Advisory Council meeting in the NASA 
Ames Research Center Conference Center. All non-U.S. citizens must 
submit their name, current address, citizenship, company affiliation 
(if applicable) to include address, telephone number, and their title, 
place of birth, date of birth, U.S. visa information to include type, 
number, and expiration date, U.S. Social Security Number (if 
applicable), Permanent Resident Alien card number and expiration date 
(if applicable), place and date of entry into the U.S., and passport 
information to include country of issue, number, and expiration date to 
Ms. Rho Christensen, Protocol Specialist, Office of the Center 
Director, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, by October 22, 
2009. For questions, please call Ms. Rho Christensen at (650) 604-2476.

    Dated: October 8, 2009.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-24792 Filed 10-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
SCPW-20-0000560

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

ISAIAH W. MCCOY, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE TODD W. EDDDINS, Judge of the Circuit Court of the

First Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,

and

STATE OF HAWAI#I and FRANCIS SEQUEIRA, Warden,

O#ahu Community Correctional Center, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CR. NO. 1CPC-19-0001279)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

AND SECOND AMENDMENT TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ.,

and Circuit Judge Kuriyama, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of petitioner Isaiah W. McCoy’s

petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed on October 29, 2020,

the amendments, and the record, it cannot be said that the

respondent judge committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of

discretion in revoking bail under the specific facts and

circumstances of this case, or that petitioner is entitled to the

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-20-0000560

06-NOV-2020

01:09 PM

Dkt. 35 ODDP
requested extraordinary relief from this court. See, e.g., HRS

§§ 804-3(b) and 807-7.3; Oili v. Chang, 57 Haw. 411, 412, 557

P.2d 787, 788 (1976). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

habeas corpus and the second amendment to the petition for writ

of habeas corpus are denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 6, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Christine E. Kuriyama

2
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trans World Entertainment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 3, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), we, Robert J. Higgins, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John J. Sullivan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|

|/s/
        Robert J. Higgins        |  | /s/
        John J. Sullivan
|------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------
|Robert J. Higgins                    |  | John J. Sullivan            
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  | Executive Vice President and
|                                     |  | Chief Financial Officer     
|June 12, 2008                        |  | June 12, 2008               











---
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 14, 2021

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20

- 0691 Lower Tribunal No. 17

- 1986

________________ 

### Law Offices of Alexander E. Borell , P.A. , Appellant,

vs. 

### In re: Jesus Cala Acevedo vs Herga I mperiod Noda, et al ., Appellee s

.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Valerie R. Manno Schurr and Daryl E. Trawick , Judge s

. Law Office of Alexander E. Borell, P.A., and Alexander E. Borell and Vanessa Jaleh Bravo , for appellant. The Law Offices of Mario G. Menocal, P.A., and Mario G. Menocal , for appellee Jesus Cala Acevedo

.
Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and MILLER , JJ. PER CURIAM.2 The Law Offices of Alexander Borell (“Borell”), counsel for defendant below , Herga Noda , in an action brought by plaintiff below , Jesus Cala Acevedo , appeals one order granting Acevedo’s motion for sanctions pursuant to section 57.105, a second order denying Borell’s motion for relief from the sanctions award, and a third order awarding attor ney’s fees and
costs

.

“ [T] he award of attorney ’ s fees is a matter committed to sound judicial discretion which will not be disturbed on appeal, absent a showing of clear abuse of discretion. ” Lanson v. Reid , 314 So. 3d 385 , 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (quotatio n omitted )

. “The trial court’s finding must be based upon substantial competent evidence presented to the court at the hearing on attorney’s fees or otherwise before the court and in the trial court record.” Weatherby Assocs. Inc. v. Ballack , 783 So. 2d 1 138, 1141 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (citation omitted) ; accord Lanson , 314 So. 3d at 387. “When there are issues of fact

. . . [and] [ w ] ithout a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.” Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Ta llahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979). We are constrained by the record before us. Borell ha s not provided

a transcript of any of the hearing s conducted in the trial court , and thus the3 trial court’s findings must be presumed correct. See Lanson , 314 So. 3d at 388 n.4 (citing Applegate , 377 So. 2d at 1152 ). As such, w e can find no abuse of discretion by the lower court in awarding attorney ’ s fees under section 57.105. However, nothing in the te x t of section 57.105(1) provide s for the award of costs. See In re Estate of Assimakopoulos , 228 So. 3d 709 , 713 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017 ) ( collecting cases that reverse the award of costs under section 57.105 (1) ). Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the order awarding costs. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions to strike the award of costs.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 10


                       UNITED ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
                         PROFIT SHARING AND 401(K) PLAN

                                 SIXTH AMENDMENT

         WHEREAS, United Asset Management Corporation (hereinafter referred to
as the "Company") adopted the United Asset Management Corporation Profit Sharing
and 401(k) Plan (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan") effective as of January
1, 1989 and restated effective January 1, 1990, to provide retirement benefits
for certain employees of the Company and its subsidiaries; and

         WHEREAS, in accordance with Article 11, the Company wishes to amend the
Plan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of January 1,
2000, unless otherwise indicated, as follows:

         THE FOLLOWING PROVISION IS ADDED AS THE FINAL PARAGRAPH OF SECTION 6.3
         OF ARTICLE 6: Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant who is
         involuntarily terminated under a combination of two circumstances shall
         be immediately and fully vested in such Participant's Company Account:

         (a)    The termination is for reasons unrelated to job performance; and
         (b)    In the circumstances of the termination, the Participant is
                covered by a salary continuation plan adopted by his or her
                Company (as defined at Section 1.10 of this Plan).

         Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan is hereby reaffirmed in
         all respects. Signed as a sealed Massachusetts instrument effective as
         of the date stated above.


<PAGE>   2

                               UNITED ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION


                                     /s/ William H. Park
                               BY: ____________________________________________
                                     William H. Park, Executive Vice President



May 3, 2000
Date





















                                       2
§ 232.2 Rule of construction for obtaining and using unsolicited medical information. ( a ) *In general.* A creditor does not obtain medical information in violation of the prohibition if it receives medical information pertaining to a consumer in connection with any determination of the consumer's eligibility, or continued eligibility, for credit without specifically requesting medical information.
( b ) *Use of unsolicited medical information.* A creditor that receives unsolicited medical information in the manner described in paragraph (a) of this section may use that information in connection with any determination of the consumer's eligibility, or continued eligibility, for credit to the extent the creditor can rely on at least one of the exceptions in § 232.3 or § 232.4.
( c ) *Examples.* A creditor does not obtain medical information in violation of the prohibition if, for example: ( 1 ) In response to a general question regarding a consumer's debts or expenses, the creditor receives information that the consumer owes a debt to a hospital.
( 2 ) In a conversation with the creditor's loan officer, the consumer informs the creditor that the consumer has a particular medical condition.
( 3 ) In connection with a consumer's application for an extension of credit, the creditor requests a consumer report from a consumer reporting agency and receives medical information in the consumer report furnished by the agency even though the creditor did not specifically request medical information from the consumer reporting agency.
Exhibit 32



DYNATEM, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Dynatem, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ending August 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Dated: October 14, 2003



/s/    MICHAEL HORANMichael Horan, Chief Executive Officer






/s/    BELEN RAMOSBelen Ramos, Chief Financial Officer
J

- S36015

- 15

*Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 IN RE: ADOPTION OF: D.E.A.
APPEAL OF: E.A., MOTHER : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA No. 1647 WDA 2014 Appeal from the PCRA Order entered August 4, 2014 in the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County, Orphans’ Court, at No(s): 151 of 2013

- D BEFORE: PANELLA, JENKINS, and STRASSBURGER,* JJ. CONCURRING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED:August 26, 2015 Because Mother was not permitted to take care of Child’s daily needs, as she was only granted supervised visitation, and because she did attend her scheduled visits with Child, I cannot agree that the record provides clear and convincing evidence that she refused or failed to perform parental duties, as is required for termination under subsection 2511(a)(1). See , e.g. , In re I.J. , 972 A.2d 5, 10 (Pa. Super. 2009) (agreeing evidence was insufficient under subsection (a)(1) where the parents attended their scheduled visitation sessions). However, I agr ee that the Agency met its burden under subsection 2511(a)(8), which requires proof of the following three things: (1) the child has been in placement for a year or more, “[(2)] the conditions which led to the removal or placement of the child continue to exist and [(3)] termination of parental rights would best serve the needs and welfare of the child.” 23 Pa.C.S. § 2511(a)(8).J

- S36015

- 15

- 2

-

Here, the Agency offered clear and convincing proof that Mother has failed to remedy the drug

- related conditions that led to C hild’s placement, after she was given more than a year of time and assistance to do so. See Majority Memorandum at 2

- 3 (discussing Mother’s lack of compliance and progress with FSP goals). The evidence also established that terminating Mother’s parental rights serves Child’s best interests. See id. at 11

- 13 (detailing the testimony of psychologist Carol Hughes and caseworker Susan Storer). Further, as the Majority properly holds, the Agency met its burden under subsection 2511(b). See id. Therefore, I would affirm the termination of Mother’s rights under subsections (a)(8) and (b). Judge Jenkins joins this concurring memorandum.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-04-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-06-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                           7,768
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,686
<INVENTORY>                                     18,819
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,549
<PP&E>                                          37,644
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,838
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,091
<SALES>                                        163,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               200,011
<CGS>                                          106,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,107
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,036
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,020
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,016
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,016
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
        

</TABLE>
121 STAT. 240 PUBLIC LAW 110–46—JULY 5, 2007

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 801:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):

Apr. 10, considered and passed Senate.

June 25, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 110–46

110th Congress

An Act

To designate a United States courthouse located in Fresno, California, as the

‘‘Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States courthouse bordered by O Street, P Street,

Tulare Street, and Capitol Street in Fresno, California, shall be

known and designated as the ‘‘Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the

‘‘Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse’’.

Approved July 5, 2007.

July 5, 2007

[S. 801]
#### § 361.2 Why does the FDIC have this outreach program?

It is the policy of the FDIC that minorities and women, and businesses owned by them have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in contracts awarded by the FDIC.
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2570 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 17, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado, as the ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Carson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

HR 2570 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DR. KARL E. CARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort 

4 Collins, Colorado, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Carson Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Carson 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS