Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 23 / Thursday, February 5, 2009 / Notices 6139 

will notify interested parties of the 

hearing schedule. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on the preliminary results of 

this review. Interested parties may 

submit case briefs within 30 days of the 

date of publication of this notice. 

Rebuttal briefs, which must be limited 

to issues raised in the case briefs, may 

be filed not later than 35 days after the 

date of publication of this notice. Parties 

who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs 

in this review are requested to submit 

with each argument (1) a statement of 

the issue and (2) a brief summary of the 

argument with an electronic version 

included. 

We intend to issue the final results of 

this review, including the results of our 

analysis of issues raised in any 

submitted written comments, within 

120 days after publication of this notice. 

Assessment Rates 

The Department shall determine, and 

CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 

all appropriate entries. Although FET 

indicated that it was not the importer of 

record for any of its sales to the United 

States during the POR, it reported the 

name of the importer of record for all of 

its U.S. sales. Because FET reported the 

entered value for all of its U.S. sales, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

we have calculated an importer-specific 

assessment rate for the merchandise in 

question by aggregating the dumping 

margins we calculated for all U.S. sales 

to the importer and dividing this 

amount by the total entered value of 

those sales. We intend to issue 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of the final results of this 

review. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment 

Clarification). This clarification will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by FET for 

which it did not know its merchandise 

was destined for the United States. In 

such instances, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. For a full discussion of 

this clarification, see Assessment 

Clarification. 

Cash-Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

notice of final results of administrative 

review for all shipments of PSF from 

Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication as provided by 

section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The 

cash-deposit rate for FET will be the rate 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by manufacturers 

or exporters not covered in this review 

but covered in a prior segment of the 

proceeding, the cash-deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

if the exporter is not a firm covered in 

this review, a prior review, or the 

original investigation but the 

manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the merchandise; and (4) if neither the 

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm 

covered in this review, the cash-deposit 

rate will be 7.31 percent, the all-others 

rate established in Notice of Amended 

Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value: Certain Polyester 

Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea 

and Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain 

Polyester Staple Fiber From the 

Republic of Korea and Taiwan, 65 FR 

33807 (May 25, 2000). 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: January 28, 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–2398 Filed 2–4–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–855] 

Certain Non-Frozen Apple Juice 

Concentrate From the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Time 

Limits for the Preliminary Results of 

the Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 5, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alexis Polovina, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 9, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3927. 

Background 

On July 30, 2008, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of certain nonfrozen apple juice concentrate from the 

People’s Republic of China covering the 

period June 1, 2007 through May 31, 

2008. See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews, Request for Revocation in Part, 

and Deferral of Administrative Review, 

73 FR 44220 (July 30, 2008). The 

preliminary results are currently due no 

later than March 2, 2009. 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

requires the Department to make a 

preliminary determination within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of an order for which a review 

is requested and a final determination 

within 120 days after the date on which 

the preliminary results are published. 

However, if it is not practicable to 

complete the review within these time 

periods, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

allows the Department to extend the 

time limit for the preliminary 

determination to a maximum of 365 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month. 

Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary 

Results 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the preliminary results of 

this review within the original time 

limit because the Department requires 

additional time to analyze the 

supplemental questionnaire responses, 

possibly issue additional supplemental 

questionnaires, and evaluate the most 

appropriate surrogate values on the 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
6140 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 23 / Thursday, February 5, 2009 / Notices 

administrative record to use in this 

segment of the proceeding. Therefore, 

the Department is extending the time 

limit for completion of the preliminary 

results by 120 days. The preliminary 

results will now be due no later than 

June 30, 2009. The final results continue 

to be due 120 days after the publication 

of the preliminary results. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: January 30, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–2478 Filed 2–4–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army 

Notice of Availability of the Final 

Environmental Impact Statement 

(FEIS) for the Implementation of Fort 

Carson’s Grow the Army (GTA) 

Stationing Decisions 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice of Availability (NOA). 

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army 

announces the availability of an FEIS for 

the implementation of the decision to 

station a new Infantry Brigade Combat 

Team (IBCT) and other combat support 

units at Fort Carson, Colorado, and the 

potential stationing of a Combat 

Aviation Brigade (CAB) at Fort Carson 

in the future. 

DATES: The waiting period will end 30 

days after the publication of an NOA in 

the Federal Register by the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency. 

ADDRESSES: For specific questions 

regarding the FEIS, please contact: Fort 

Carson National Environmental Policy 

Act Coordinator, 1638 Elwell Street, 

Building 6236, Fort Carson, CO 80913– 

4000 or via e-mail at 

CARSDECAMNEPA@conus.army.mil. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Dee McNutt, Fort Carson Public Affairs 

Office, at (719) 526–1269, during normal 

business hours. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Proposed Action and analysis in the 

FEIS includes constructing new 

facilities at Fort Carson to support an 

IBCT and other combat support units 

(approximately 3,900 additional 

Soldiers and their dependents) and the 

potential stationing of a CAB 

(approximately 2,800 Soldiers and their 

dependents), upgrading ranges at Fort 

Carson, and increased use of live-fire 

training ranges and maneuver areas at 

Fort Carson and the Pinon Canyon 

Maneuver Site (PCMS). Implementation 

of the Proposed Action is anticipated in 

2009 and would begin following the 

signing of the Record of Decision (ROD). 

The Proposed Action does not include 

the expansion of PCMS or any 

construction at PCMS. 

The GTA EIS is not directly related to 

the Fort Carson or Pinon Canyon 

Maneuver Site (PCMS) Transformation 

EISs published in 2007. Those EISs 

analyzed actions that were separate 

from and independent of the GTA 

program. Further, those EISs were 

completed before the GTA action had 

been proposed and evaluated. The GTA 

actions combined with the 

Transformation actions will, however, 

produce cumulative effects that are 

analyzed in this GTA EIS. 

The stationing of additional BCTs and 

other force structure realignment actions 

across the Army was analyzed in the 

2007 Final Programmatic Environmental 

Impact Statement for Army Growth and 

Force Structure Realignment. The ROD 

determined that Fort Carson would 

receive an additional IBCT and other 

combat support units contingent on sitespecific NEPA analysis. This FEIS is 

that site-specific analysis of the 

environmental and socioeconomic 

impacts of alternatives for implementing 

the Army’s previous stationing decision. 

The FEIS also analyzes the potential 

stationing of a CAB. 

The FEIS analyzes the impacts of 

several alternatives for construction of 

the IBCT facilities and the No Action 

alternative. Under the No Action 

alternative, the stationing of a new IBCT 

and CAB at Fort Carson would not be 

implemented. The No Action alternative 

provides the baseline conditions for 

comparison to the Proposed Alternative. 

After reviewing the alternatives 

presented in the EIS, the Army has 

selected the Operational Training 

Readiness Center alternative for the 

siting of IBCT facilities as its preferred 

alternative. 

Copies of the FEIS are available at 

local libraries surrounding Fort Carson 

and PCMS and may also be accessed at 

http://www.aec.army.mil. Comments 

from the public will be considered 

before any final decision is made. 

Dated: January 26, 2009. 

Addison D. Davis, IV, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army 

(Environment, Safety and Occupational 

Health). 

[FR Doc. E9–2379 Filed 2–4–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Navy 

Notice of Record of Decision for the 

Final Supplemental Environmental 

Impact Statement for Developing 

Homeport Facilities for Three NIMITZClass Aircraft Carriers in Support of 

the U.S. Pacific Fleet at Naval Air 

Station North Island, Coronado, CA 

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice of Record of Decision. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy 

(Navy), after carefully weighing the 

operational and environmental 

consequences of the proposed action, 

announces its decision to upgrade 

carrier berthing (Berth LIMA) at Naval 

Air Station (NAS) North Island to 

comply with current nuclear-powered 

aircraft carrier (CVN) facility 

requirements. The minor infrastructure 

improvements include construction of: 

A fender system, mooring bollards, 

security building, and antiterrorism 

(AT)/force protection (FP) 

improvements, as well as the 

installation of information systems, 

electrical and mechanical utility 

upgrades, paving, drainage, and site 

improvements. In addition, the Navy 

announces its intent to implement 

additional vehicular traffic mitigation 

measures to address new facts and 

circumstances relevant to traffic. 

Although the 2008 Traffic Study 

included in the 2008 Final 

Supplemental Environmental Impact 

Statement (SEIS) shows that direct 

traffic impacts have not changed 

significantly since they were studied in 

the 1999 Final Environmental Impact 

Statement (FEIS), additional traffic 

mitigation measures minimize the 

cumulative effects of vehicular traffic 

when three homeported aircraft carriers 

are simultaneously in port. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Record of Decision (ROD) has been 

distributed to all those individuals who 

requested a copy of the Final SEIS and 

agencies and organizations that received 

a copy of the Final SEIS. The complete 

text of the ROD is available for public 

viewing on the project Web site at 

http://www.nimitzcarriersseis.com/ 

along with copies of the Final SEIS and 

supporting documents. Single copies of 

the ROD will be made available upon 

request by contacting Mr. Robert 

Montana, Naval Facilities Engineering 

Command Southwest, 2730 McKean 

Street, Building 291, San Diego, CA 

92136, telephone: 619–556–8509. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES