alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
W6390 Challenger Drive, Suite 203  Appleton, WI 54914-9120 

Phone: 920-739-5123  Fax: 920-739-1325

February 29, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building ground floor

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Dear Sir:

RE: Docket number FAA-2001-10221

Pursuant to 14CFR 11.61, Air Wisconsin Airlines Corporation petitions the 

Administrator for an extension to Exemption 7778 which allows for qualified and

authorized company check airman to conduct the observation of a new PIC required by 

14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii).

Air Wisconsin Airlines is not requesting any changes to the current exemption.

Air Wisconsin Airlines has captains being trained monthly. The use of this exemption 

will allow for timely observations of captain candidates and thus allow them to be 

productive.

The rest of the justification remains the same.

Granting this extension would:

 Allow the FAA greater flexibility and better use of its inspection force by

focusing on higher priority safety functions;

 Allow Air Wisconsin Airlines the opportunity to have the observation completed 

during Operating Experience instead of having to reschedule it after the Operating 

Experience is essentially complete except for the observation, thereby allowing 

the pilot to immediately become productive.

 Allow Air Wisconsin Airlines the opportunity to significantly increase use of 

qualified pilots and improve its ability to provide an on-time, dependable air 

service to the public; and

 Allow Air Wisconsin Airlines the opportunity to reduce the unnecessary cost of 

wages and lost productivity for those qualified pilots waiting for FAA 

observation. These costs eventually are passed on to the traveling public.
– 2 – March 6, 2016

No Adverse Effect on Safety

Granting an extension of this exemption would have no adverse effect on safety because:

 The check airman authorized to conduct the observation will be highly trained and 

experienced with the particular airplane type and will be approved by the FAA;

 The check airman will be used to fulfill 14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii) only when a 

qualified FAA inspector is not available;

 The FAA continues to have the authority to observe any pilot any time during line 

operations

While Air Wisconsin Airlines does not see any need for publication in the Federal 

Register, the following is offered as a summary for publication if necessary:

Air Wisconsin Airlines Corporation Petitions for an extension to Exemption 7778

Air Wisconsin Airlines Corporation petitions for an extension to Exemption 7778 which 

allows for the FAA, at their discretion, to allow a FAA designated Company Check 

airman to conduct the Captain Observation as required by 14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii) when 

an FAA inspector is not available in a timely manner. This exemption is subject to 

certain conditions and limitations as stated in the exemption.

Sincerely

Michael S. Melotte

Flight Training Standards Development Manager

(920) 749-7534

Michael.melotte@airwis.com
283-LTS Doc#:22324-2 Filed:09/16/22 Entered:09/20/22 14:38:26 Desc:

Envelope Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO****SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Scott Poteracki, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of MTI TechnologyCorporation (the “Company”), certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended April 3, 2004, of the Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.     Date: December 22, 2004 By: /s/ SCOTT POTERACKI   Scott Poteracki   Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
#### § 303.6 Investigations and examinations.

The FDIC may examine or investigate and evaluate facts related to any filing under this chapter to the extent necessary to reach an informed decision and take any action necessary or appropriate under the circumstances.
EX-10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE 

CONTINENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. 

2014 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

Pursuant to the authority granted to the Board of Directors of Continental Building Products, Inc. under the Continental Building Products,
Inc. 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of May 5, 2015: 
 1. Section 16
of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
  

	 	16.	Transferability 

 Each Award may not be sold, transferred for value, pledged, assigned,
or otherwise alienated or hypothecated by a Participant other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and each Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercisable only by the Participant during his or her lifetime. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, (i) outstanding Options may be exercised following the Participant’s death by the Participant’s beneficiaries or as permitted by the Committee and (ii) a Participant may transfer or assign an Award as a gift to an
entity wholly owned by such Participant (an “Assignee Entity”), provided that such Assignee Entity shall be entitled to exercise assigned Options and Stock Appreciation Rights only during lifetime of the assigning
Participant (or following the assigning Participant’s death, by the Participant’s beneficiaries or as otherwise permitted by the Committee) and provided further that such Assignee Entity shall not further sell, pledge, transfer,
assign or otherwise alienate or hypothecate such Award. 
 Except as modified hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect and unmodified.
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________ 

 Project No.: 0172.07.005.503 DISTRIBUTION 

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: 304(m) Annual Review 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 

 Outgoing Call 

Date: 2/15/2010 Time: 12:15 pm EST 

Company Name: ExxonMobil Joliet Refinery 

Contact Name: Jeff Noga 

Phone No.: 815-521-7681 

Name: Jessica Wolford Eastern Research Group, Inc.

GENERAL SUBJECT : Basis of Hexachlorobenzene load reported to TRI in 2008 

 

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN 

On Monday, February 15, 2010, I left a message for Ms. Tricia Simpson asking to discuss the 

hexachlorobenzene load reported to TRI in 2008. 

On Monday, February 15, 2010, Ms. Simpson returned my call and instructed me to contact Mr. Jeff Noga, the 

environmental manager, to discuss the TRI report. 

On Monday, February 15, 2010, I contacted Mr. Noga and explained that I was interested in the 

hexachlorobenzene reported to TRI in 2008. Mr. Noga forwarded my request to the TRI reporting contact, who 

said that they calculated the pounds of hexachlorobenzene released using 1⁄2 the detection limit because although 

it was not detected it could be in the crude oil. The contact did not recall seeing any hexachlorobenzene 

detections for the years she developed the TRI reports.
§ 19.35 Conduct of hearings. ( a ) *General rules* — ( 1 ) *Conduct of hearings.* Hearings must be conducted so as to provide a fair and expeditious presentation of the relevant disputed issues. Each party has the right to present its case or defense by oral and documentary evidence and to conduct such cross examination as may be required for full disclosure of the facts.
( 2 ) *Order of hearing.* Enforcement Counsel will present its case-in-chief first, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ, or unless otherwise expressly specified by law or regulation. Enforcement Counsel will be the first party to present an opening statement and a closing statement and may make a rebuttal statement after the respondent's closing statement. If there are multiple respondents, respondents may agree among themselves as to their order of presentation of their cases, but if they do not agree, the ALJ will fix the order.
( 3 ) *Examination of witnesses.* Only one counsel for each party may conduct an examination of a witness, except that in the case of extensive direct examination, the ALJ may permit more than one counsel for the party presenting the witness to conduct the examination. A party may have one counsel conduct the direct examination and another counsel conduct re-direct examination of a witness, or may have one counsel conduct the cross examination of a witness and another counsel conduct the re-cross examination of a witness.
( 4 ) *Stipulations.* Unless the ALJ directs otherwise, all stipulations of fact and law previously agreed upon by the parties, and all documents, the admissibility of which have been previously stipulated, will be admitted into evidence upon commencement of the hearing.
( b ) *Transcript.* The hearing must be recorded and transcribed. The reporter will make the transcript available to any party upon payment by that party to the reporter of the cost of the transcript. The ALJ may order the record corrected, either upon motion to correct, upon stipulation of the parties, or following notice to the parties upon the ALJ's own motion.
( c ) *Electronic presentation.* Based on the circumstances of each hearing, the ALJ may direct the use of, or any party may use, an electronic presentation during the hearing. If the ALJ requires an electronic presentation during the hearing, each party will be responsible for their own presentation and related costs, unless the parties agree to another manner in which to allocate presentation responsibilities and costs.
§ 403.8 Appeals. ( a ) The Vice Chairman is designated to receive appeals on requests for declassification which have been denied by the Bank. Such appeals shall be addressed to: First Vice President & Vice Chairman, Export-Import Bank of the United States, 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20571
The appeal must be received within 60 days after receipt by appellant of the denial letter. Appeals shall be decided within 30 days of their receipt by the Vice Chairman. ( 1 ) If the decision is to declassify the materials in their entirety, the Vice Chairman shall promptly make such information available to the requester, and inform the requester of any fees due before releasing the documents.
( 2 ) If the decision is to deny declassification of a portion of the material, the Vice Chairman shall promptly make the part which was declassified available to the requester, and shall advise the requester, in writing, of the reasons for the partial denial of declassification.
( 3 ) If the decision is to deny declassification of all the material, the Vice Chairman shall promptly advise the requester, in writing, of the reasons for such denial.
§ 51.5 Order of priorities. The OCC will pay receivership expenses and proved claims against the uninsured bank in receivership in the following order of priority: ( a ) Administrative expenses of the receiver;
( b ) Unsecured creditors of the uninsured bank, including secured creditors to the extent their claim exceeds their valid and enforceable security interest;
( c ) Creditors of the uninsured bank, if any, whose claims are subordinated to general creditor claims; and
( d ) Shareholders of the uninsured bank.
#### §§ 410.112-410.129 [Reserved]
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.
**Title:****Freedom of Information Act annual report[electronic resource].
** 
1998 | 1999
2000 | 2001 | 2002| 2003 | 2004| 2005 | 2006| 2007
 
SuDoc Number:T 22.1/3:
Item Number:0955-A-01 (online)
CGP System Number:000611181
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
July 18, 2017**********
#### § 390.303 Parent company; subsidiary.

The term *parent company* means any company which directly or indirectly controls any other company or companies. The term *subsidiary* means any company which is owned or controlled directly or indirectly by a person, and includes a subsidiary owned in whole or in part by a State savings association, or a subsidiary of that subsidiary.
§ 390.415 Effective date. ( a ) Except as provided for in paragraph (d) of this section, an offering circular filed by a State savings association shall be deemed to be automatically declared effective by the FDIC on the twentieth day after filing or on such earlier date as the FDIC may determine for good cause shown.
( b ) If any amendment is filed prior to the effective date, the offering circular shall be deemed to have been filed when such amendment was filed.
( c ) The period until automatic effectiveness under this subpart shall be stated at the bottom of the facing page of the Form OC or any amendment.
( d ) The effectiveness will be delayed if a duly authorized amendment, telegram confirmed in writing, or letter states that the effective date is delayed until a further amendment is filed specifically stating that the offering circular will become effective in accordance with this subpart.
( e ) An amendment filed after the effective date of the offering circular shall become effective on such date as the FDIC may determine.
( f ) If it appears to the FDIC at any time that the offering circular includes any untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, then the FDIC may pursue any remedy it is authorized to pursue under section 8 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1818), including, but not limited to, institution of cease-and-desist proceedings.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 21, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 51678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20366]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

32 CFR Part 68

[Docket No. DOD-2013-OS-0093]
RIN 0790-AJ06

Voluntary Education Programs; Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 
Readiness, DoD.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 (78 FR 49382-49400), the 
Department of Defense published a proposed rule titled Voluntary 
Education Programs. Subsequent to the publication of the proposed rule 
in the Federal Register, DoD discovered an error in Sec.  68.5(f)(1) on 
page 49388. This proposed rule corrects this error.

DATES: This correction is effective on August 21, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Toppings, 571-372-0485.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 68.5(f)(1) is corrected to read as 
follows:

Sec.  68.5  [Corrected]

    On page 49388, in the second column, in Sec.  68.5(f)(1), in the 
fourth line, ``paragraph (f) of this section'' should read ``paragraph 
(f) of Sec.  68.6.''

    Dated: August 16, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013-20366 Filed 8-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

Order 

April 23, 2014

148118 & (109)

EDWIN A. NICHOLS,

Plaintiff-Appellee/

Cross-Appellant,

v SC: 148118

COA: 303783

WCAC: 08-000024, 08-000050

HOWMET CORPORATION and PACIFIC

EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY/

CIGNA,

Defendants-Appellants/

Cross-Appellees, 

and

CORDANT TECHNOLOGIES and

MICHIGAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY

ASSOCIATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to 

appeal, we VACATE Part III, Section D of the Court of Appeals opinion and we 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals. On remand, the Court of Appeals shall 

address the issue of whether there should be an allocation of liability for worker’s 

compensation wage loss benefits, such that defendant Pacific Employers Insurance 

Company, as the insurer at the time of the plaintiff’s cervical injuries, is only obligated to 

pay differential wage loss benefits beyond those defendant American Manufacturers 

Mutual Insurance (now substituted by the Michigan Property & Casualty Association), as 

the insurer at the time of the plaintiff’s low back injury, must pay for the plaintiff’s wage 

loss due to that later injury. MCL 418.301(5)(e), as constituted at the time applicable to 

this case, did not allocate liability between insurance carriers for the payment of wage 

loss benefits. And, contrary to the determination of the Court of Appeals, defendant 

Pacific Employers did raise this issue in response to the appeals of the plaintiff and 
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 23, 2014

t0416

2

Clerk

American Manufacturers at the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission 

(WCAC). The WCAC implicitly rejected Pacific Employers’ argument by assigning full 

wage loss liability to that insurer. As the appellee at the WCAC, Pacific Employers 

adequately raised the issue for the purpose of subsequent Court of Appeals review. 

Consideration of this issue is necessary for a proper determination of the case, the issue 

presenting a question of law where all facts necessary for its resolution have been 

presented. In all other respects, the application for leave to appeal and the application for 

leave to appeal as cross-appellant are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

We do not retain jurisdiction.
§ 50.10 Liquidity coverage ratio. ( a ) *Minimum liquidity coverage ratio requirement.* Subject to the transition provisions in subpart F of this part, a national bank or Federal savings association must calculate and maintain a liquidity coverage ratio that is equal to or greater than 1.0 on each business day in accordance with this part. A national bank or Federal savings association must calculate its liquidity coverage ratio as of the same time on each calculation date (the elected calculation time). The national bank or Federal savings association must select this time by written notice to the OCC prior to December 31, 2019. The national bank or Federal savings association may not thereafter change its elected calculation time without prior written approval from the OCC.
( b ) *Calculation of the liquidity coverage ratio.* A national bank's or Federal savings association's liquidity coverage ratio equals: ( 1 ) The national bank's or Federal savings association's HQLA amount as of the calculation date, calculated under subpart C of this part; *divided by*
( 2 ) The national bank's or Federal savings association's total net cash outflow amount as of the calculation date, calculated under subpart D of this part.
[79 FR 61523, 61538, Oct. 10, 2014, as amended at 84 FR 59268, Nov. 1, 2019]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3304

To amend the Department of Education Organization Act to establish an 

Assistant Secretary for Community and Junior Colleges. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 15, 2003

Mr. UPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Department of Education Organization Act 

to establish an Assistant Secretary for Community and 

Junior Colleges.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR COMMUNITY AND 

4 JUNIOR COLLEGES. 

5 (a) AMENDMENT.—Section 202(b)(1) of the Depart6 ment of Education Organization Act (20 U.S.C. 

7 3412(b)(1)) is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara9 graph (E); 
2

•HR 3304 IH 

1 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (F) as sub2 paragraph (G); and 

3 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the fol4 lowing new subparagraph: 

5 ‘‘(F) an Assistant Secretary for Community 

6 and Junior Colleges; and’’. 

7 (b) REPEAL.—Subsection (i) of such section 202 is 

8 repealed.

Æ
#### §§ 622.62-622.75 [Reserved]