alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3379

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3210 East 10th Street in

Bloomington, Indiana, as the ‘‘Francis X.McCloskey Post Office Building’’.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3379

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 3210 East 10th Street in Bloomington, Indiana, as the ‘‘Francis X. McCloskey Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3379 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 3210 East 10th Street in Bloomington, Indiana,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Francis X. McClos5 key Post Office Building’’ .

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Francis X. McCloskey Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 5,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
The Airworthiness Limitations section is approved by Transport Canada and specifies maintenance required by any applicable airworthiness or operational rule unless an alternative program has been approved by the Minister of Transport. Approved by: Roop Dhaliwal Acting Chief, Engineering Airworthiness Branch, Transport Canada **CL−605 TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKS** 

# PART 2 **AIRWORTHINESS LIMITATIONS**

PART 2 Cover Mar 16/2011
P.O. Box 520461, San Jose Village, Tinian, MP 96952-0461

Tel.: 670-433-9998/9989 Fax.: 670-433-9990 Web site: www.starmarianasair.com

Page 1 of 2

Marianas Air

September 6, 2011

US Department of Transportation

Air Carrier Fitness Division

Attn: Ms. Katherine O’Toole

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

In reference to Docket DOT-OST-2010-0235

Application of Star Marianas Air, Inc. for Commuter Authority

Dear Ms. O’Toole,

This letter is being written in response to your emails dated 8/25/2011 and 9/1/2011 requesting a 

formal agreement between Star Marianas Air, Inc. (STAR) and Tinian Dynasty Hotel and Casino (TDHC) 

for the charter flight services provided. The Company’s stockholders and board of directors do not 

believe it is in STAR’s best interests to enter into a long term formal agreement with TDHC or other 

customers.

STAR’s policy has been, and will continue to be, not to enter into contracts that could place an undue 

burden on the company and/or threaten our ability to maintain independent operational control of our 

flights. With constantly fluctuating prices of oil and gasoline and changes to aircraft availability, STAR 

needs to maintain flexibility in its arrangements with different customer groups to allow changes to 

charter prices and the number of flights it can support.

Whereas presently a majority of STAR’s revenues are generated through flights chartered by TDHC (it is 

the single tourist event on the island of Tinian), the Company is making substantial efforts to diversify its 

customer base, thereby decreasing the percentage of revenue generated from TDHC. The primary 

purpose of STAR’s application for commuter authority is to realize the goal of increasing revenue from 

other than TDHC chartered flights. 

Since there is no requirement for STAR to have a formal contract with TDHC, we respectfully request 

that STAR’s application process continues without having a formal agreement with TDHC or other 

customers that we serve. I welcome any questions you may have related to this letter.

Sincerely,

Shaun R Christian

President/COO
Page 2 of 2

COMPLIANCE DISPOSITION

The contents of this application and the attached exhibit (s) are true and correct to the best of my 

knowledge and belief. Pursuant to Title 18 United States Code Section 1001, I Shaun R Christian, in my 

individual capacity and as the authorized representative of the applicant, have not in any manner 

knowingly and willfully falsified, concealed or failed to disclose any material fact or made any false, 

fictitious, or fraudulent statement or knowingly used any documents which contain such statements in 

connection with the preparation, filing or prosecution of the application. I understand that an individual 

who is found to have violated the provisions of 18 U.S.C section 1001 shall be fined or imprisoned not 

more than five years, or both.
§ 614.4570 Recourse and security. ( a ) *Full recourse and guarantee.* All obligations that are funded or discounted through a Farm Credit Bank or agricultural credit bank shall be endorsed with the full recourse or unconditional guarantee of the OFI.
( b ) *General collateral.* ( 1 ) Each Farm Credit Bank and agricultural credit bank shall take as collateral all notes, drafts, and other obligations that it funds or discounts for each OFI; and
( 2 ) Each Farm Credit Bank and agricultural credit bank shall perfect, in accordance with State law, a senior security interest in any and all obligations and the proceeds thereunder that the OFI pledges as collateral.
( c ) *Supplemental collateral.* ( 1 ) Each Farm Credit Bank and agricultural credit bank shall develop policies and loan underwriting standards that establish uniform and objective requirements to determine the need and amount of supplemental collateral or other credit enhancements that each OFI shall provide as a condition for obtaining funding, discount and other similar financial assistance from such Farm Credit bank.
( 2 ) The amount, type, and quality of supplemental collateral or other credit enhancements required for each OFI shall be established in the general financing agreement and shall be proportional to the level of risk that the OFI poses to the Farm Credit Bank or agricultural credit bank.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,359,272
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,424,249
<PP&E>                                      19,467,903
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,995,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,029,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          166,916
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     824,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,029,012
<SALES>                                        595,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               634,643
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               303,603
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             496,625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (165,585)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (165,585)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (165,585)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
## What You Need To Know

# Taking Aspirin to Lower Your Risk of Heart Attack

----

*If you are at risk for a heart attack, taking aspirin every day or every other day can lower your risk.*

----

## How Do I Know if I Am At Higher Risk for A Heart Attack?

You may be at higher risk for a heart attack if you can say yes to any of the following:

- I am a man over 40.
- I am a woman past menopause.
- I smoke.
- I have diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, or a family history of heart disease.

If you answered "**Yes**" to any of these, talk to your doctor or nurse about whether taking aspirin is right for you. 

## Is Aspirin Safe?

For most people, taking aspirin is safe. But for some people, aspirin can increase the chance of bleeding in the stomach or intestines and may cause a small increase in some kinds of stroke. 

For that reason, taking aspirin is not the right choice for everyone.  The higher your risk of heart disease, the more you have to gain by taking aspirin.  

## What Should I Do?

Ask your doctor or nurse about taking aspirin. They can help you decide:

- Whether to take aspirin.
- What kind to take.
- How much to take.
- How often to take it.

## Background

The *What You Need To Know* series provides recommendations for the public on staying healthy from AHRQ. The recommendations are based on the work of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), sponsored by AHRQ. 

The USPSTF is an independent panel of experts in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics-gynecology, pediatrics, nursing, prevention research, and psychology. The Task Force reviews research on a wide range of preventive services, including screening, counseling, and using medications to prevent disease, then makes recommendations for the public.

Put Prevention Into Practice
PPIP
PPIP tools

## For More Information

To order more copies of this fact sheet or other PPIP material for patients, clinicians, or office systems, call the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse:

**Phone:** 1-800-358-9295**Outside the United States:** (703) 437-2078 **Toll-free TDD service; hearing impaired only:** 888-586-6340 

*Current as of January 2002*

**Internet citation:**

*What You Need To Know: Taking Aspirin to Lower Your Risk of Heart Attack*. Fact Sheet. January 2002. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/consumer/aspneed2.htm

Return to Consumers and PatientsAHRQ Home PageDepartment of Health and Human Services
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7287

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAREN KAREEM GADSDEN, a/k/a D,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:11-cr-00302-CCB-3)

Submitted: January 17, 2019 Decided: January 23, 2019

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daren Kareem Gadsden, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Daren Kareem Gadsden appeals the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as successive and unauthorized, as well as 

its order summarily denying his self-styled motions to correct sentencing errors and for 

justice. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. 

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gadsden’s informal brief does not challenge the district 

court’s holding that his § 2255 motion was successive and unauthorized, Gadsden has 

forfeited appellate review of the court’s order dismissing the motion. See Williams v. 

Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). We thus affirm the court’s order 

dismissing Gadsden’s § 2255 motion. See United States v. Gadsden, No. 1:11-cr-00302-

CCB-3 (D. Md. Oct. 4, 2018). 

As to the order denying Gadsden’s secondary motions, the record establishes that 

these likewise were successive and unauthorized habeas motions, which the district court 

should have dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We may, however, affirm the court’s 

order “on any grounds apparent from the record[,]” United States v. Riley, 856 F.3d 326, 

328 (4th Cir.) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 273 (2017), and 

this disposition is eminently supported by the record. Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s secondary order, as well. See Gadsden, No. 1:11-cr-00302-CCB-3 (D. Md. filed 

Oct. 4, 2018 & entered Oct. 5, 2018). We deny Gadsden’s motion for a transcript at 

government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000743

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

HOWARD HOFELICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, and SOUTH PACIFIC SCUBA

TOURS, INC., Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, v. STATE OF HAWAII;

STATE OF HAWAII DCCA, DLNR; DENNIS KRUEGER, Esq.;

ASHFORD AND WRISTON LAW CORPORATION; DAVID KAAPU, Esq.;

CARL VICENTI; JUNG & VASSAR LAW CORPORATION; RONALD IBARRA;

DAVID LAWTON; UNITED STATES COAST GUARD VESSEL

DOCUMENTATION CENTER; GENTRY KONA MARINA, INC.; GKM, INC.;

GARY LAMBERT; RONALD EDWARD CLARK; MAKANI KAI CHARTERS, INC.;

MOCK CHEW; DIVE O CORPORATION; DIVE OAHU CORPORATION;

AACTION ADVENTURE, INC.; DIVE “O” DOES; PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION

OF DIVE INSTRUCTORS, INC., Defendants-Appellees, and

JOHN DOES 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10;

DOE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 3CCV-21-0000297)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, McCullen and Chan, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that selfrepresented Plaintiff-Appellant Howard Hofelich appeals from the

Circuit Court of the First Circuit's (circuit court) December 16,

2022 "Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law and Order Granting

Defendants David Lawton, Esq. and Jung & Vassar, P.C.'s Motion to

Designate Plaintiff Howard Hofelich a Vexatious Litigant and for

an Order to Post Security and Prefiling Order" (Order). We

conclude that the court lacks appellate jurisdiction because the

circuit court has not entered a final, appealable order or

judgment. See Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 641-1(a) (2016);

Hawai i Rules of Civil Procedure Rules 54(b), 58; Jenkins v.

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-22-0000743

05-JAN-2023

08:06 AM

Dkt. 14 ODSLJ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai i 115, 119, 869 P.2d

1334, 1338 (1994). Further, the Order is not independently

appealable under the collateral-order doctrine, the Forgay1

doctrine, or HRS § 641-1(b). See Greer v. Baker, 137 Hawai i

249, 253, 369 P.3d 832, 836 (2016) (setting forth the

requirements for appealability under the collateral-order

doctrine and the Forgay doctrine); HRS § 641-1(b) (specifying

requirements for leave to file interlocutory appeal). 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are

dismissed as moot.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, January 5, 2023.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Presiding Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen

Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Associate Judge

1 Forgay v. Conrad, 47 U.S. 201 (1848).

2
42297.

#### FIREMAN’S FUND AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY et al. v. HESTER.

*Felton, C. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*

Submitted September 9, 1966

Decided January 16, 1967.

Pannell,, Judge.

The Georgia Workmen’s Compensation Act *{Code*§ 114-707) requires that an award of the Board of Workmen’s Compensation shall be accompanied by a statement of findings of fact upon which it is made in order that the losing party may intelligently prepare his appeal and that the cause may thereupon be intelligently reviewed. To fulfill this requirement, the findings of fact must consist of a concise but comprehensive statement of the cause and circumstances of the accident as found to be true by the Board of Workmen’s Compensation and similar findings of fact upon any material issue in the case. See *Atlanta Transit System v. Harcourt,*94 Ga. App. 503 (95 SE2d 41); *Southeastern Exp. Co. v. Edmondson,*30 Ga. App. 697 (1) (119 SE 39); *American Mutual Liab. Ins. Co. v. Hardy,*36 Ga. App. 387, 390 (137 SE 113); *Noles v. Aragon Mills,*110 Ga. App. 374 (138 SE2d 598); *Dudley v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.,*111 Ga. App. 214 (141 SE2d 179); *Grier v. Travelers Ins. Co.,*112 Ga. App. 159 (2) (144 SE2d 196); *Lee v. General Accident Group,*112 Ga. App. 197 (1a) (144 SE2d 457). The findings of fact by the director and approved by the board made no decision or findings on the issues. The judge of the superior court, therefore, pursuant to the above authorities, should have remanded the case to the Board of Workmen’s Compensation with direction that findings of fact be made on the issues involved. The order of the trial judge reversing the Board of Workmen’s Compensation is affirmed with direction that he vacate the present order of reversal and enter a new order of reversal in accordance with this opinion remanding the case to the Board of Workmen’s Compensation.

*Judgment affirmed with direction.*

*40*Young, Young & Ellerbee, F. Thomas Young,*for appellants.

*W. D. Knight, E. B. Smith, Sr.,*for appellee.
LTS Doc#:19822-2 Filed:01/18/22 Entered:01/19/22 15:40:24 Desc:

Envelope Page 1 of 1
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC
Docket No. CP09-455-000.Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Docket No. CP09-456-000.
 On October 21, 2009, the Office of Energy Projects staff will be in Jackson County, Mississippi and Mobile County, Alabama to gather data related to the environmental analysis of the proposed Mobile Bay Lateral Extension Project and the Pascagoula Expansion Project. Staff will examine locations along the proposed pipeline routes filed by 
                    ( print page 52961)
                    Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC focusing on where the pipelines would cross residential areas in Jackson County, Mississippi; Mobile County, Alabama; and a residence on Rainbow Lake Road, Grand Bay, Alabama. This will assist staff in completing its evaluation of environmental impacts of the two projects. *All interested parties planning to attend must provide their own transportation. Those attending should meet at the following location:* Wednesday October 21, 2009 at 1 p.m. (CST): Holiday Inn Express Moss Point parking lot, 4800 Amoco Drive, Moss Point, MS 39563. Please use the FERC's free eSubscription service to keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in these dockets. This can reduce the amount of time you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to the documents. To register for this service, go to 
                    *http://www.ferc.gov/​esubscribenow.htm*. Information about specific onsite environmental reviews is posted on the Commission's calendar at 
                    *http://www.ferc.gov/​EventCalendar/​EventsList.aspx*. For additional information contact Office of External Affairs at 1-866-208-FERC (3372). Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


[FR Doc. E9-24803 Filed 10-14-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**EXHIBIT 12.2**
I, John O. Ottestad, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Norsk Hydro;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;  4.  The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15eand 15d-15e) for the company and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and proceduresor caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis annual report is being prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the compnay‘sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in thecompany’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurredduring the period covered by this report that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s control overfinancial reporting; and
 5.  The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditorsand the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thecompany’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in thecompany’s internal controls over financial reporting.     Date: 18 March 2005   /s/ John O. Ottestad       John O. Ottestad   Executive Vice President and   Chief Financial Officer
#### § 627.4 Action for the removal of the conservator or receiver.

Within 30 days after the Farm Credit Administration Board appoints FCSIC as the conservator or receiver of a Farm Credit institution, pursuant to § 627.3, the institution may bring an action in the United States District Court for the judicial district in which its home office is located, or the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, for an order requiring the Farm Credit Administration Board to remove such conservator or receiver and, if the charter has been canceled, to rescind the cancellation of the charter. The institution's board of directors is empowered to meet subsequent to the appointment of a conservator or receiver and authorize the filing of an action in Federal court to remove the conservator or receiver. Only the institution's board of directors has the power to authorize an action to remove the conservator or receiver.