alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Thomas P. Raimondi, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of MTI Technology
Corporation (the registrant), certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended April 3, 2004, of the registrant;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls over financial reporting. Date: July 15, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ THOMAS P. RAIMONDI, JR.Thomas P. Raimondi, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22764 Filed:10/26/22 Entered:10/31/22 16:58:28 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
3-LTS Doc#:19825-2 Filed:01/18/22 Entered:01/19/22 15:56:06 Desc:

Envelope Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Quipp, Inc.,
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000 and is
qualified In its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                   150,243
<SECURITIES>                                          16,939,480
<RECEIVABLES>                                          5,263,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                             356,424
<INVENTORY>                                            3,671,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      27,217,328
<PP&E>                                                 1,961,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                           177,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        29,599,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  8,986,403
<BONDS>                                                  850,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                  18,957
<OTHER-SE>                                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          29,599,013
<SALES>                                               25,773,383
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      25,773,383
<CGS>                                                 16,257,579
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         21,047,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        30,667
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        5,281,048
<INCOME-TAX>                                           1,839,185
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    3,441,863
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                           3,441,863
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 1.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               1.78



</TABLE>
§ 617.7200 What disclosures must a qualified lender make to a borrower on loans offered with more than one rate of interest? A qualified lender that offers more than one rate of interest to borrowers must notify each borrower of the right to request a review of the interest rate charged on his or her loan no later than the time of loan closing. At the request of a borrower, the lender must: ( a ) Provide a review of the loan to determine if the proper interest rate has been established;
( b ) Explain to the borrower in writing the basis for the interest rate charged; and
( c ) Explain to the borrower in writing how the credit status of the borrower may be improved to receive a lower interest rate on the loan.
[69 FR 16459, Mar. 30, 2004]
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

40) ll-K- (B) -28 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:49 AM Sheet 40 of 325 
P.2 

'A-83-27 

II-K-(B)-28 

ESP CONTROL COSTS FOR RESIDUAL OIL-FIRED BOILERS. 

Letter from K. Held, EEA to J. Pratapas, EPArSASD. 

September 7, 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-28
Exhibit 99.1


                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of  Epolin,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August  31,  2002,
as  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to  18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002, to the best  of  the  undersigneds
knowledge, that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: October 15, 2002         /s/ Murray S. Cohen
                                   Murray S. Cohen,
                                   Chairman of the Board and
                                   Chief Executive Officer


Date: October 15, 2002         /s/ James Ivchenko
                                   James Ivchenko,
                                   President (Principal Financial
                                   Officer)
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofAldila, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), eachof the undersigned officers of Aldila, Inc. hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aldila, Inc.

 
| /s/ Peter R. Mathewson  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Peter R. Mathewson      |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ Robert J. Cierzan   |   |
| Robert J. Cierzan       |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                         |        |  |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aldila, Inc. andwill be retained by Aldila, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

April 9, 2004

 

----
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Davidson Growth Plus, L.P.(the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of thePartnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### § 366.1 What is the purpose of this part?

This part establishes the minimum standards of integrity and fitness that contractors, subcontractors, and employees of contractors and subcontractors must meet if they perform any service or function on our behalf. This part includes regulations governing conflicts of interest, ethical responsibility, and use of confidential information in accordance with section 12(f)(3) of the FDI Act, 12 U.S.C. 1822(f)(3), and the prohibitions and the requirements for submission of information in accordance with section 12(f)(4) of the FDI Act, 12 U.S.C. 1822(f)(4).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>

FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 25, 1998

</LEGEND>
<CIK>        0000796502
<NAME>       WESTERBEKE CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-24-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-25-1998
<CASH>                                          47,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,052,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                    63,800
<INVENTORY>                                  5,514,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,510,900
<PP&E>                                       6,020,800
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,851,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,467,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,643,900
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,900
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,660,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,467,100
<SALES>                                     19,806,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,806,200
<CGS>                                       15,485,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,485,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,473,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             148,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                817,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   331,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   486,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.6


 


AMENDMENT TO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT







Effective as of May 7, 2015, Battelle Memorial Institute and Discovery Laboratories, Inc. hereby agree to amend the Research and Development Services Agreement between them dated as of June 22, 2012 (as it may have been previously amended, the “Agreement”) to reflect the revisions set forth herein.  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms as set forth in the Agreement.







1.                    Section 1., Term, Acceptance of Proposal(s), of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:







“The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue in full force and effect until June 31, 2016 unless earlier terminated as provided in Section 11. Discovery’s acceptance of Battelle’s Proposal(s) and the commencement and timeline of services thereunder shall be as set forth in the respective Proposal(s).”







Except as amended herein, the remaining terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  This Amendment to Research and Development Services Agreement confirms an agreement between Battelle Memorial Institute and Discovery Laboratories, Inc. with respect to the subject matter hereof and is a material part of the consideration stated in the Agreement and mutual promises made in connection therewith.  The parties have executed this Amendment to Research and Development Services Agreement on the day and date first set forth above.







	
Battelle Memorial Institute

	 	
Discovery Laboratories, Inc.


	
Corporate Operations

	 	 








	
By:

	
/s/ Beth A. Gustin

	 	
By:

	
/s/ Mary B. Templeton

	 
	
Name:

	
Beth A. Gustin

	 	
Name:

	
Mary B. Templeton, Esq.

	 
	
Title:

	
Sr. Contracts Officer

	 	
Title:

	
SVP, General Counsel
#### Frazier *v.*The State.

*Receiving Stolen Goods.*

(Decided January 13, 1914.

64 South. 162.)

1. *Appeal and Error; Revieto; Sufficiency of Evidence.*— In order to have a review of the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to show the crime alleged, there must be some method employed raising that question in the lower court,- such as to request a charge to that effect, or demurrer to evidence.

2. *Same.*— The admissibility of evidence cannot be considered on appeal; where no objection or exception thereto is shown by the bill of exceptions. -

Appeal from Montgomery City Court.

Heard before Hon. Armstead Brown.

Steve Frazier was convicted of having received or concealed stoien goods, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

Mark D. Brainard, and Hill, Hill & Whiting, for appellant.

The evidence is not sufficient to show that the goods were stolen, and the defendant was improperly *convicted.*— Perry *v.*State, 155 Ala. 93.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and T. H. Seay, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

No exceptions are reserved to the ruling o'f the trial court, and no charges requested raising the questions here' sought to be reviewed. It follows that there is nothing for review.

PELHAM, J. —

The record in this case shows that the defendant ivas indicted, tried, and found guilty by a jury of having concealed stolen goods, alleged in the indictment to be the property of the Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company.

*51It is urged by counsel for defendant in brief filed that tbe evidence set out in the bill of exceptions fails to show a larceny of tbe property, or ownership as alleged, and that on the ruling in the case of *Perry v. State,*155 Ala. 93, 46 South. 470, it was error to permit the witness Adams, the yardmaster of the railroad company, to testify that the goods checked “short” in the car. We do not see how we can review any of these questions here, as the bill of exceptions shows no objection to any testimony offered, and no exception to have been reserved to the court’s ruling on the evidence or any other matter. If the general charge, or any other charge, ivas requested by the state or defendant, it is not shown by any part of the transcript. The proceedings shown by the record proper are regular and contain no error, and nothing is presented for review of this court in such a condition of the record and bill of exceptions as would require a reversal of the judgment of conviction.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1
                              COMPUTATION OF RATIOS


The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the periods indicated below were as
follows:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             FIFTY-TWO      FIFTY-TWO    FORTY-FOUR     FIFTY-TWO     FIFTY-TWO
                                                            WEEKS ENDED    WEEKS ENDED   WEEKS ENDED   WEEKS ENDED   WEEKS ENDED
                                                           ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              JUNE 30        JULY 1        JULY 3       AUGUST 29     AUGUST 30
                                                                2001          2000          1999          1998           1997
                                                           ----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                            <C>           <C>                         <C>
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                             -----          -----         1.01          -----          1.09

Deficiency in the coverage of fixed charges by earnings       $6,600        $15,632        -----         $8,057         -----
</TABLE>



For purposes of calculating the above ratios, earnings are defined as income
before income taxes and extraordinary items, plus fixed charges. Fixed charges
consists of interest expense on all indebtedness, amortization of deferred
financing costs , and one-third of rental expense on operating leases
representing that portion of rental expense deemed by the Company to be
attributable to interest. The ratio of earnings to fixed charges equals earnings
divided by fixed charges.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19884 Filed:01/21/22 Entered:01/25/22 14:47:54 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19884 Filed:01/21/22 Entered:01/25/22 14:47:54 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 058 8 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RYAN PATRICK SULLIVAN,

Defendant and Appellant .

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 15 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 8 2021

09/08/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0588
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19832-2 Filed:01/18/22 Entered:01/19/22 17:10:

Envelope Page 1 of 1
#### Sarah Hewitt, Appellant, *v.*Louis Kent, Respondent.

(Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, ninth district, borough of Manhattan.

Parsons, Shepard & Ogden, for appellant.

J. P. Fallon, Jr., for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Evidence was given on the trial which tended to show that the defendant surrendered and the plaintiff accepted a surrender of the lease of the premises. It is true that the testimony on the part of the defendant was contradicted by a witness for the plaintiff, but the justice before whom the case was tried had the right to believe the two witnesses for the defendant, instead oí the one witness for the plaintiff.

There is nothing in the memoranda of the justice that tends to show that he did not believe the two witnesses for the defendant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

SHAWN MCCRACKEN,

Respondent

v.

STEVEN TRAYLOR AND BUFFIE 

TRAYLOR,

Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 3 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Bell Microproducts, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, W. Donald Bell, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section .906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         Dated:  March 31, 2003

                                                /s/ W. Donald Bell
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Chief Executive Officer
----

EXHIBIT 23.1 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 

We consent to the incorporation by reference to theRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-57248) pertaining to the TurboSonicTechnologies, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan and to the Registration Statement on Form S-8(No. 333-120731) pertaining to the TurboSonic Technologies, Inc. 2003 Stock Planof our report dated September 14, 2006, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of TurboSonic Technologies, Inc. for the year ended June30, 2006 included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB). 

/s/ Mintz & Partners LLP September 21, 2006 Toronto, Ontario, Canada 

 

----