Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 36199 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0013; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–ASW–33] 

Amendment of Class E Airspace; 

Taylor, TX 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E 

airspace at Taylor, TX. Controlled 

airspace is necessary to accommodate 

new Area Navigation (RNAV) Standard 

Instrument Approach Procedures at 

Taylor Municipal Airport. The FAA is 

taking this action to enhance the safety 

and management of Instrument Flight 

Rule (IFR) operations at the airport. 

Airport coordinates also are adjusted. 

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, 

September 18, 2014. The Director of the 

Federal Register approves this 

incorporation by reference action under 

1 CFR Part 51, subject to the annual 

revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and 

publication of conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raul 

Garza, Jr., Central Service Center, 

Operations Support Group, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Southwest 

Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort 

Worth, TX 76137; telephone 817–321– 

7654. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On April 7, 2014, the FAA published 

in the Federal Register a notice of 

proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to modify 

Class E airspace at Taylor Municipal 

Airport, Taylor, TX (79 FR 19030) 

Docket No. FAA–2014–0013. Interested 

parties were invited to participate in 

this rulemaking effort by submitting 

written comments on the proposal to the 

FAA. No comments were received. Class 

E airspace designations are published in 

paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9X 

dated August 7, 2013, and effective 

September 15, 2013, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

The Rule 

This action amends Title 14 Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by 

amending Class E airspace by creating a 

segment extending from the 6.4-mile 

radius of Taylor Municipal Airport, 

Taylor, TX, to 10.7 miles north of the 

airport, for new RNAV standard 

instrument approach procedures 

developed at the airport. Controlled 

airspace is needed for the safety and 

management of IFR operations at the 

airport. The geographic coordinates of 

the airport are adjusted to be in concert 

with the FAAs aeronautical database. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that only affects air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, does not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the agency’s 

authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it amends 

controlled airspace at Taylor Municipal 

Airport, Taylor, TX. 

Environmental Review 

The FAA has determined that this 

action qualifies for categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act in accordance with FAA 

Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental 

Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’ 

paragraph 311a. This airspace action is 

not expected to cause any potentially 

significant environmental impacts, and 

no extraordinary circumstances exist 

that warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 7, 2013, and effective 

September 15, 2013, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas 

extending upward from 700 feet or more 

above the surface. 

* * * * * 

ASW TX E5 Taylor, TX [Amended] 

Taylor Municipal Airport, TX 

(Lat. 30°34′22′′ N., long. 97°26′36′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 

radius of Taylor Municipal Airport, and 

within 1.6 miles each side of the 039° bearing 

from the airport extending from the 6.4-mile 

radius to 11.2 miles northeast of the airport, 

and within 3.9 miles each side of 021° 

bearing from the airport extending from the 

6.4-mile radius to 7.3 miles northeast of the 

airport, and within 2 miles each side of the 

359° bearing from the airport extending from 

the 6.4-mile radius to 10.7 miles north of the 

airport. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 17, 

2014. 

Kent M. Wheeler, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO 

Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2014–14904 Filed 6–25–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–14–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

15 CFR Part 744 

[Docket No. 140522446–4446–01] 

RIN 0694–AG19 

Addition of Certain Persons to the 

Entity List; and Removal of Person 

From the Entity List Based on Removal 

Request 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Commerce. 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
36200 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule amends the Export 

Administration Regulations (EAR) by 

adding four persons under five entries 

to the Entity List. The persons who are 

added to the Entity List have been 

determined by the U.S. Government to 

be acting contrary to the national 

security or foreign policy interests of the 

United States. These persons will be 

listed on the Entity List under the 

destinations of China and Hong Kong. 

There are five entries for four persons 

because one person is listed under 

multiple countries, resulting in one 

additional entry. Specifically, the one 

additional entry covers one person in 

China who also has an address in Hong 

Kong. 

In addition, this rule removes one 

person from the Entity List, as the result 

of a request for removal submitted by 

the person, a review of information 

provided in the removal request in 

accordance with the EAR, and further 

review conducted by the End-User 

Review Committee (ERC). 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is 

effective June 26, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karen Nies-Vogel, Chair, End-User 

Review Committee, Office of the 

Assistant Secretary, Export 

Administration, Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Department of Commerce, 

Phone: (202) 482–5991, Fax: (202) 482– 

3911, Email: ERC@bis.doc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to 

Part 744) notifies the public about 

entities that have engaged in activities 

that could result in an increased risk of 

the diversion of exported, reexported or 

transferred (in-country) items to 

weapons of mass destruction (WMD) 

programs. Since its initial publication, 

grounds for inclusion on the Entity List 

have expanded to include activities 

sanctioned by the State Department and 

activities contrary to U.S. national 

security or foreign policy interests, 

including terrorism and export control 

violations involving abuse of human 

rights. Certain exports, reexports, and 

transfers (in-country) to entities 

identified on the Entity List require 

licenses from BIS and are usually 

subject to a policy of denial. The 

availability of license exceptions in 

such transactions is very limited. The 

license review policy for each entity is 

identified in the license review policy 

column on the Entity List and the 

availability of license exceptions is 

noted in the Federal Register notices 

adding persons to the Entity List. BIS 

places entities on the Entity List based 

on certain sections of part 744 (Control 

Policy: End-User and End-Use Based) of 

the EAR. 

The End-user Review Committee 

(ERC), composed of representatives of 

the Departments of Commerce (Chair), 

State, Defense, Energy and, where 

appropriate, the Treasury, makes all 

decisions regarding additions to, 

removals from, or other modifications to 

the Entity List. The ERC makes all 

decisions to add an entry to the Entity 

List by majority vote and all decisions 

to remove or modify an entry by 

unanimous vote. 

ERC Entity List Decisions 

Additions to the Entity List 

This rule implements the decision of 

the ERC to add four persons under five 

entries to the Entity List on the basis of 

§ 744.11 (License requirements that 

apply to entities acting contrary to the 

national security or foreign policy 

interests of the United States) of the 

EAR. The five entries added to the 

Entity List consist of four entries in 

China, and one entry in Hong Kong. 

The ERC reviewed § 744.11(b) 

(Criteria for revising the Entity List) in 

making the determination to add these 

four persons to the Entity List. Under 

that paragraph, persons for whom there 

is reasonable cause to believe, based on 

specific and articulable facts, have been 

involved, are involved, or pose a 

significant risk of being or becoming 

involved in, activities that are contrary 

to the national security or foreign policy 

interests of the United States and those 

acting on behalf of such persons may be 

added to the Entity List. Paragraphs 

(b)(1) through (b)(5) of § 744.11 include 

an illustrative list of activities that could 

be contrary to the national security or 

foreign policy interests of the United 

States. 

The four persons being added have 

been determined by the ERC to be 

involved in activities that are contrary 

to the national security or foreign policy 

interests of the United States, including 

the activities described under paragraph 

(b)(2) and (b)(5) of § 744.11. 

The ERC determined that Poly 

Technologies Inc., Xinshidai Company 

(New Era Group), and Panda 

International Information Technology 

Company, all located in China, and 

HWA Create, located in China and Hong 

Kong, be added to the Entity List on the 

basis of their attempts to procure items, 

including U.S.-origin items, for 

activities contrary to the national 

security and foreign policy interests of 

the United States. The ERC determined 

that these persons’ activities have 

included the activities described under 

paragraph (b)(2) and (b)(5) of § 744.11 of 

the EAR. Specifically, these companies 

have attempted to supply items to the 

People’s Liberation Army and/or to 

export items to destinations sanctioned 

by the United States. The Department of 

State sanctioned Poly Technologies Inc. 

under the Iran, North Korea and Syria 

Nonproliferation Act (INKSNA) in 

February 2013. Xinshidai Company was 

sanctioned in 2004 by the Departments 

of State and the Treasury under 

Executive Order 12938, and again by the 

State Department under INKSNA in 

2008. 

Pursuant to § 744.11(b)(2) and (b)(5) of 

the EAR, the ERC determined that the 

conduct of these four persons raises 

sufficient concern that prior review of 

exports, reexports, or transfers (incountry) of items subject to the EAR 

involving these persons, and the 

possible imposition of license 

conditions or license denials on 

shipments to the persons, will enhance 

BIS’s ability to prevent violations of the 

EAR. 

For the four persons recommended for 

addition, the ERC specified a license 

requirement for all items subject to the 

EAR and a license review policy of 

presumption of denial. The license 

requirements apply to any transaction in 

which items are to be exported, 

reexported, or transferred (in-country) to 

any of the persons or in which such 

persons act as purchaser, intermediate 

consignee, ultimate consignee, or enduser. In addition, no license exceptions 

are available for exports, reexports, or 

transfers (in-country) to the persons 

being added to the Entity List in this 

rule. 

This final rule adds the following four 

persons under five entries to the Entity 

List: 

China 

(1) China Xinshidai Company, a.k.a., 

the following one alias: 

—China New Era Group, Xinshidai 

Plaza, Plaza No. 7 Huayuan Rd., Beijing, 

China; 

(2) HWA Create, 5/F, Xinshidai 

Building/New Era Mansion, 7 Huayuan 

Rd., Beijing, China; and 

No. B3 Huayuan Rd., Beijing, China 

(See alternate addresses under Hong 

Kong); 

(3) Panda International Information 

Technology Company, Ltd., 7/F, B 

Tower, Yingwu Conference Center, No. 

6. Huayuan Road, Haidian District, 

Beijing, China; and 

Rm 606 Block B, Beijing Agricultural 

Science Building, Shugang Garden 

Haidian Middle Rd, Beijing, China; and 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 36201 

(4) Poly Technologies Inc., 11F Poly 

Plaza, 14 Dongzhimen Nandajie, Beijing 

China; and 

27 Wanshoulu, Haidian district, 

Beijing, China. 

Hong Kong 

(1) HWA Create, Unit 1001–1002, 10F, 

Chinachem Building, 34–37 Connaught 

Rd., Hong Kong; and 

Unit A 5th Floor, Cheong Commercial 

Building, 19–25 Jervois St, Hong Kong; 

and 

Unit B, 6/F, Dah Sing Life Building, 

99—1–5 Des Voeux Rd, Hong Kong (See 

alternate addresses under China). 

Removal From the Entity List 

This rule implements a decision of 

the ERC to remove one person, Masoud 

Est. for Medical and Scientific Supplies, 

located in Jordan, from the Entity List as 

a result of the person’s request for 

removal from the Entity List. Based 

upon the review of the information 

provided in the removal request in 

accordance with § 744.16 (Procedure for 

requesting removal or modification of 

an Entity List entity), and after review 

by the ERC’s member agencies, the ERC 

determined that this person should be 

removed from the Entity List. 

The ERC decision to remove this 

person took into account this person’s 

cooperation with the U.S. Government 

during the appeal process. In 

accordance with § 744.16(c), the Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Export 

Administration has sent written 

notification to this person, informing 

this entity of the ERC’s decision to 

remove it from the Entity List. This final 

rule implements the decision to remove 

the following person located in Jordan 

from the Entity List: 

Jordan 

(1) Masoud Est. for Medical and 

Scientific Supplies, 74 First Floor, Tla’a 

Al Ali Khali Al Salim Street, Amman, 

Jordan 11118. 

The removal of the one entity 

referenced above, which was made on 

the basis of a § 744.16 removal request 

and was approved by the ERC, 

eliminates the existing license 

requirements in Supplement No. 4 to 

part 744 for exports, reexports and 

transfers (in-country) to the entity. 

However, the removal of this entity from 

the Entity List does not relieve persons 

of other obligations under part 744 of 

the EAR or under other parts of the 

EAR. Neither the removal of an entity 

from the Entity List nor the removal of 

Entity List-based license requirements 

relieves persons of their obligations 

under General Prohibition 5 in 

§ 736.2(b)(5) of the EAR which provides 

that, ‘‘you may not, without a license, 

knowingly export or reexport any item 

subject to the EAR to an end-user or 

end-use that is prohibited by part 744 of 

the EAR.’’ Additionally this removal 

does not relieve persons of their 

obligation to apply for export, reexport 

or in-country transfer licenses required 

by other provisions of the EAR. BIS 

strongly urges the use of Supplement 

No. 3 to part 732 of the EAR, ‘‘BIS’s 

‘Know Your Customer’ Guidance and 

Red Flags,’’ when persons are involved 

in transactions that are subject to the 

EAR. 

Savings Clause 

Shipments of items removed from 

eligibility for a License Exception or 

export or reexport without a license 

(NLR) as a result of this regulatory 

action that were en route aboard a 

carrier to a port of export or reexport, on 

June 26, 2014, pursuant to actual orders 

for export or reexport to a foreign 

destination, may proceed to that 

destination under the previous 

eligibility for a License Exception or 

export or reexport without a license 

(NLR). 

Export Administration Act 

Although the Export Administration 

Act expired on August 20, 2001, the 

President, through Executive Order 

13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001 

Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by 

Executive Order 13637 of March 8, 

2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and 

as extended by the Notice of August 8, 

2013, 78, 2013, 78 FR 49107(August 12, 

2013), has continued the Export 

Administration Regulations in effect 

under the International Emergency 

Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to 

carry out the provisions of the Export 

Administration Act, as appropriate and 

to the extent permitted by law, pursuant 

to Executive Order 13222 as amended 

by Executive Order 13637. 

Rulemaking Requirements 

1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 

direct agencies to assess all costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety 

effects, distributive impacts, and 

equity). Executive Order 13563 

emphasizes the importance of 

quantifying both costs and benefits, of 

reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, 

and of promoting flexibility. This rule 

has been determined to be not 

significant for purposes of Executive 

Order 12866. 

2. Notwithstanding any other 

provision of law, no person is required 

to respond to nor be subject to a penalty 

for failure to comply with a collection 

of information, subject to the 

requirements of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of 

information displays a currently valid 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) Control Number. This regulation 

involves collections previously 

approved by OMB under control 

number 0694–0088, Simplified Network 

Application Processing System, which 

includes, among other things, license 

applications and carries a burden 

estimate of 43.8 minutes for a manual or 

electronic submission. Total burden 

hours associated with the PRA and 

OMB control number 0694–0088 are not 

expected to increase as a result of this 

rule. You may send comments regarding 

the collection of information associated 

with this rule, including suggestions for 

reducing the burden, to Jasmeet K. 

Seehra, Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB), by email to Jasmeet_K._

Seehra@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to (202) 

395–7285. 

3. This rule does not contain policies 

with Federalism implications as that 

term is defined in Executive Order 

13132. 

4. For the four persons added under 

five entries to the Entity List in this final 

rule, the provisions of the 

Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 

553) requiring notice of proposed 

rulemaking, the opportunity for public 

comment and a delay in effective date 

are inapplicable because this regulation 

involves a military or foreign affairs 

function of the United States. (See 5 

U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). BIS implements this 

rule to protect U.S. national security or 

foreign policy interests by preventing 

items from being exported, reexported, 

or transferred (in country) to the persons 

being added to the Entity List. If this 

rule were delayed to allow for notice 

and comment and a delay in effective 

date, then entities being added to the 

Entity List by this action would 

continue to be able to receive items 

without a license and to conduct 

activities contrary to the national 

security or foreign policy interests of the 

United States. In addition, because these 

parties may receive notice of the U.S. 

Government’s intention to place these 

entities on the Entity List if a proposed 

rule is published, doing so would create 

an incentive for these persons to either 

accelerate receiving items subject to the 

EAR to conduct activities that are 

contrary to the national security or 

foreign policy interests of the United 

States, or to take steps to set up 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
36202 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

additional aliases, change addresses, 

and other measures to try to limit the 

impact of the listing on the Entity List 

once a final rule was published. Further, 

no other law requires that a notice of 

proposed rulemaking and an 

opportunity for public comment be 

given for this rule. Because a notice of 

proposed rulemaking and an 

opportunity for public comment are not 

required to be given for this rule by 5 

U.S.C. 553, or by any other law, the 

analytical requirements of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly, 

no regulatory flexibility analysis is 

required and none has been prepared. 

5. For the one removal from the Entity 

List in this final rule, pursuant to the 

Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 

U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), BIS finds good 

cause to waive requirements that this 

rule be subject to notice and the 

opportunity for public comment 

because it would be contrary to the 

public interest. 

In determining whether to grant 

removal requests from the Entity List, a 

committee of U.S. Government agencies 

(the End-user Review Committee (ERC)) 

evaluates information about and 

commitments made by listed persons 

requesting removal from the Entity List, 

the nature and terms of which are set 

forth in 15 CFR part 744, Supplement 

No. 5, as noted in 15 CFR 744.16(b). The 

information, commitments, and criteria 

for this extensive review were all 

established through the notice of 

proposed rulemaking and public 

comment process (72 FR 31005 (June 5, 

2007) (proposed rule), and 73 FR 49311 

(August 21, 2008) (final rule)). This 

removal has been made within the 

established regulatory framework of the 

Entity List. If the rule were to be 

delayed to allow for public comment, 

U.S. exporters may face unnecessary 

economic losses as they turn away 

potential sales because the customer 

remained a listed person on the Entity 

List even after the ERC approved the 

removal pursuant to the rule published 

at 73 FR 49311 on August 21, 2008. By 

publishing without prior notice and 

comment, BIS allows the applicant to 

receive U.S. exports immediately since 

the applicant already has received 

approval by the ERC pursuant to 15 CFR 

part 744, Supplement No. 5, as noted in 

15 CFR 744.16(b). 

The removals from the Entity List 

granted by the ERC involve interagency 

deliberation and result from review of 

public and non-public sources, 

including sensitive law enforcement 

information and classified information, 

and the measurement of such 

information against the Entity List 

removal criteria. This information is 

extensively reviewed according to the 

criteria for evaluating removal requests 

from the Entity List, as set out in 15 CFR 

part 744, Supplement No. 5 and 15 CFR 

744.16(b). For reasons of national 

security, BIS is not at liberty to provide 

to the public the information on which 

the ERC relied to make the decision to 

remove this entity. In addition, the 

information included in the removal 

request is specific to information 

exchanged between the applicant and 

the ERC, which by law (section 12(c) of 

the Export Administration Act), BIS is 

restricted from sharing with the public. 

The removal requests from the Entity 

List contain confidential business 

information, which is necessary for the 

extensive review conducted by the U.S. 

Government in assessing such removal 

requests. 

Section 553(d) of the APA generally 

provides that rules may not take effect 

earlier than thirty (30) days after they 

are published in the Federal Register. 

BIS finds good cause to waive the 30- 

day delay in effectiveness under 5 

U.S.C. 553(d)(1) because this rule is a 

substantive rule which relieves a 

restriction. This rule removes a 

requirement (the Entity-List-based 

license requirement and limitation on 

use of license exceptions) on this one 

person being removed from the Entity 

List. The rule does not impose a 

requirement on any other person for this 

one removal from the Entity List. 

No other law requires that a notice of 

proposed rulemaking and an 

opportunity for public comment be 

given for this final rule. Because a 

notice of proposed rulemaking and an 

opportunity for public comment are not 

required under the APA or by any other 

law, the analytical requirements of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq.) are not applicable. As a result, 

no final regulatory flexibility analysis is 

required and none has been prepared. 

List of Subject in 15 CFR Part 744 

Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Terrorism. 

Accordingly, part 744 of the Export 

Administration Regulations (15 CFR 

parts 730–774) is amended as follows: 

PART 744—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for 15 CFR 

part 744 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 

U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 

42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 

U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 

1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 

3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59 

FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 

12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 

356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 

Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 

CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 

44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 

13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 

786; Notice of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 

(August 12, 2013); Notice of September 18, 

2013, 78 FR 58151 (September 20, 2013); 

Notice of November 7, 2013, 78 FR 67289 

(November 12, 2013); Notice of January 21, 

2014, 79 FR 3721 (January 22, 2014). 

■ 2. Supplement No. 4 to part 744 is 

amended: 

■ a. By adding under China, in 

alphabetical order, four Chinese entities; 

and 

■ b. By adding under Hong Kong, in 

alphabetical order, one Hong Kong 

entity. 

■ c. By removing the heading ‘‘Jordan,’’ 

and one Jordanian entity, ‘‘Masoud Est. 

for Medical and Scientific Supplies, 74 

First Floor, Tla’a Al Ali Khali Al Salim 

Street, Amman, Jordan 11118.’’ 

The additions read as follows: 

Supplement No. 4 to Part 744—Entity 

List 

Country Entity License 

requirement 

License 

review policy 

Federal 

Register 

citation 

*******

CHINA, PEOPLE’S 

REPUBLIC OF 

*******

China Xinshidai Company, a.k.a., 

the following one alias: -China 

New Era Group.

For all items subject to the EAR. 

(See § 744.11 of the EAR).

Presumption of 

denial.

79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER 6– 

26–14]. 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 36203 

Country Entity License 

requirement 

License 

review policy 

Federal 

Register 

citation 

Xinshidai Plaza, Plaza No. 7 

Huayuan Rd., Beijing, China.

* * * * * * * 

HWA Create, 5/F, Xinshidai Building/New Era Mansion, 7 Huayuan 

Rd., Beijing, China; and No. B3 

Huayuan Rd., Beijing, China (See 

alternate addresses under Hong 

Kong).

For all items subject to the EAR. 

(See § 744.11 of the EAR).

Presumption of 

denial.

79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER 6– 

26–14]. 

* * * * * * * 

Panda International Information 

Technology Company, Ltd., 7/F, B 

Tower, Yingwu Conference Center, No. 6. Huayuan Road, 

Haidian District, Beijing, China; 

and Rm 606 Block B, Beijing Agricultural Science Building, 

Shugang Garden Haidian Middle 

Rd, Beijing, China.

For all items subject to the EAR. 

(See § 744.11 of the EAR).

Presumption of 

denial.

79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER 6– 

26–14]. 

Poly Technologies Inc., 11F Poly 

Plaza, 14 Dongzhimen Nandajie, 

Beijing China; and 27 Wanshoulu, 

Haidian district, Beijing, China.

For all items subject to the EAR. 

(See § 744.11 of the EAR).

Presumption of 

denial.

79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER 6– 

26–14]. 

* * * * * * * 

HONG KONG 

* * * * * * * 

HWA Create, Unit 1001—1002, 10F, 

Chinachem Building, 34–37 

Connaught Rd., Hong Kong; and 

Unit A 5th Floor, Cheong Commercial Building, 19–25 Jervois 

St, Hong Kong; and Unit B, 6/F, 

Dah Sing Life Building, 99—1–5 

Des Voeux Rd, Hong Kong (See 

alternate addresses under China).

For all items subject to the EAR. 

(See § 744.11 of the EAR).

Presumption of 

denial.

79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER 6– 

26–14]. 

* * * * * * * 

Dated: June 20, 2014. 

Kevin J. Wolf, 

Assistant Secretary for Export 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2014–14935 Filed 6–25–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 

20 CFR Part 416 

[Docket No. SSA–2009–0027] 

RIN 0960–AH02 

Electronic Substitutions for SSA–538 

AGENCY: Social Security Administration. 

ACTION: Final rules. 

SUMMARY: This final rule adopts, 

without change, the final rule with 

request for comments we published in 

the Federal Register (76 FR 41685) on 

July 15, 2011. We are revising our 

regulations to reflect our use of 

electronic case processing at the initial 

and reconsideration levels of our 

administrative review process. We are 

not changing the requirement that State 

agency medical and psychological 

consultants must affirm the accuracy 

and completeness of their findings of 

fact and discussion of the supporting 

evidence, only the manner in which 

they may provide the required findings 

and affirmation. This revision will 

improve our efficiency by increasing our 

use of electronic resources. 

DATES: These final rules are effective 

June 26, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cheryl Williams, Office of Medical 

Listings Improvement, Social Security 

Administration, 6401 Security 

Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235– 

6401, (410) 965–1020. For information 

on eligibility or filing for benefits, call 

our national toll-free number, 1–800– 

772–1213, or TTY 1–800–325–0778, or 

visit our Internet site, Social Security 

Online, at http://

www.socialsecurity.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

We are making final the rules for 

using electronic substitutions for the 

Childhood Disability Evaluation Form 

(SSA–538) we published as a final rule 

with request for comments in the 

Federal Register on July 15, 2011. We 

previously required adjudicators at the 

initial and reconsideration levels to 

complete Form SSA–538 in all cases of 

children alleging disability or 

continuing disability under title XVI of 

the Social Security Act. We now 

provide a Web-based tool that assists 

our adjudicators in making disability 

determinations at the initial and 

reconsideration levels. We use the new 

tool in electronic cases but do not use 

it for cases that we do not process 

electronically. The final rule permits 

our adjudicators to substitute the WebVerDate Mar<15>2010 14:44 Jun 25, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM 26JNR1

pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES