alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19949-5 Filed:01/28/22 Entered:01/31/22 10:40:10 Desc:

Envelope Page 1 of 1
#### Anna C. Woodbridge and Richie Woodbridge, *Appellants,*v. J. F. Laing, joined by her husband and next friend, J. E. Laing, *Appellees.*

Decision Filed March 3, 1923.

Petition for Rehearing Denied May 9, 1923.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County; James W. Perkins, Judge.

*John G. Leonardy,*for Appellants;

*George G. Herring,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause, having heretofore been submitted *to the*court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said *289decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

All concur.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22655 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/20/22 18:33:42 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 140 (Wednesday, July 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 43424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17993]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0389; FRL-9930-60]

Pesticides; Risk Management Approach To Identifying Options for 
Protecting the Monarch Butterfly; Notice of Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of June 24, 2015, 
concerning the document ``Risk Management Approach to Identifying 
Options for Protecting the Monarch Butterfly.'' This notice extends the 
comment period for 30 days, from July 24, 2015 to August 24, 2015. Crop 
Life America, Responsible Industry for a Sound Environment, and the 
California Crops Council requested an extension of the comment period 
to allow sufficient time to analyze the subject document and assemble 
relevant information.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPP-2015-0389, must be received on or before August 24, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in 
the Federal Register document of June 24, 2015 (80 FR 36338) (FRL-9929-
01).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Khue Nguyen, Pesticide Re-Evaluation 
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 347-0248; email address: 
nguyen.khue@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice extends the public comment 
period established in the Federal Register document of June 24, 2015. 
EPA is hereby extending the comment period, which was set to end on 
July 24, 2015, to August 24, 2015.
    To submit comments, or access the docket, please follow the 
detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in the Federal Register 
document of June 24, 2015. If you have questions, consult the person 
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: July 16, 2015.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-17993 Filed 7-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; NINDS T-32 Review.                    

*Date:*                         December 1-2, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Argonaut Hotel, 495 Jefferson Street, San Francisco, CA 94109.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Phillip F. Wiethorn, Scientific Review Administrator, DHHS/NIH/NINDS/DER/SRB, 6001 Executive Boulevard; MSC 9529, Neuroscience Center; Room 3203, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, (301) 496-5388,                         *wiethorp@ninds.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 9, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-24972 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3232

To reauthorize certain school lunch and child nutrition programs for fiscal 

year 2004. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 2, 2003

Mr. CASTLE (for himself, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, 

and Ms. WOOLSEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To reauthorize certain school lunch and child nutrition 

programs for fiscal year 2004.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004. 

4 (a) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN MILITARY HOUSING AL5 LOWANCES.—Section 9(b)(7) of the Richard B. Russell 

6 National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(b)(7)) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘and 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘through 

8 2004’’. 

9 (b) CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM.—Sec10 tion 17(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Richard B. Russell National 
2

•HR 3232 IH 

1 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1766(a)(2)(B)(i)) is amend2 ed by striking ‘‘2003’’ and inserting ‘‘2004’’. 

3 (c) REIMBURSEMENT TO STATES UNDER COM4 MODITY DISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS.—Section 15(e) of the 

5 Commodity Distribution Reform Act and WIC Amend6 ments of 1987 (7 U.S.C. 612c note; Public Law 100–237) 

7 is amended by striking ‘‘2003’’ and inserting ‘‘2004’’. 

8 (d) FUNDING MAINTENANCE OF COMMODITY DIS9 TRIBUTION PROGRAMS.—Section 14(a) of the Richard B. 

10 Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1762a(a)) 

11 is amended by striking ‘‘2003’’ and inserting ‘‘2004’’. 

12 (e) SUMMER FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM FOR CHIL13 DREN.—

14 (1) section 13(q) of the Richard B. Russell Na15 tional School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1761(q)) is 

16 amended by striking ‘‘2003’’ and inserting ‘‘2004’’. 

17 (2) section 18(f)(2) of the Richard B. Russell 

18 National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1769(f)(2)) 

19 is amended by striking ‘‘2003’’ and inserting 

20 ‘‘2004’’.

Æ
§ 337.2 Standby letters of credit. ( a ) *Definition.* As used in this section, the term *standby letter of credit* means any letter of credit, or similar arrangement however named or described, which represents an obligation to the beneficiary on the part of the issuer: ( 1 ) To repay money borrowed by or advanced to or for the account of the account party, or
( 2 ) to make payment on account of any indebtedness undertaken by the account party, or
( 3 ) to make payment on account of any default (including any statement of default) by the account party in the performance of an obligation.[1] The term *similar arrangement* includes the creation of an acceptance or similar undertaking.
( b ) *Restriction.* A standby letter of credit issued by an insured State nonmember bank shall be combined with all other standby letters of credit and all loans for purposes of applying any legal limitation on loans of the bank (including limitations on loans to any one borrower, on loans to affiliates of the bank, or on aggregate loans); *Provided, however,* That if such standby letter of credit is subject to separate limitation under applicable State or federal law, then the separate limitation shall apply in lieu of the loan limitation.[2]
( c ) *Exceptions.* All standby letters of credit shall be subject to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section except where: ( 1 ) Prior to or at the time of issuance, the issuing bank is paid an amount equal to the bank's maximum liability under the standby letter of credit; or,
( 2 ) Prior to or at the time of issuance, the issuing bank has set aside sufficient funds in a segregated deposit account, clearly earmarked for that purpose, to cover the bank's maximum liability under the standby letter of credit.
( d ) *Disclosure.* Each insured State nonmember bank must maintain adequate control and subsidiary records of its standby letters of credit comparable to the records maintained in connection with the bank's direct loans so that at all times the bank's potential liability thereunder and the bank's compliance with this section may be readily determined. In addition, all such standby letters of credit must be adequately reflected on the bank's published financial statements.
Footnotes -
337.2
[1] As defined in this paragraph (a), the term *standby letter of credit* would not include commercial letters of credit and similar instruments where the issuing bank expects the beneficiary to draw upon the issuer, which do not “guaranty” payment of a money obligation of the account party and which do not provide that payment is occasioned by default on the part of the account party.
[2] Where the standby letter of credit is subject to a non-recourse participation agreement with another bank or other banks, this section shall apply to the issuer and each participant in the same manner as in the case of a participated loan.
#### § 615.5458 Waiver of regulations.

The Farm Credit Administration reserves the right, in the Farm Credit Administration's discretion, to waive any provision(s) of the regulations in this subpart in any case or class of cases for the convenience of the Farm Credit banks and the Funding Corporation or in order to relieve any person(s) of unnecessary hardship, if such action is not inconsistent with law, does not adversely affect any substantial existing rights, and the Farm Credit Administration is satisfied that such action will not subject the Farm Credit banks and the Funding Corporation to any substantial expense or liability.
Exhibit 31.2
                          CERTIFICATION

I, James Ivchenko, certify that:

     1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-
QSB/A of Epolin, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue  statements of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact  necessary  to make the statements made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under  which  such  statements  were   made,   not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,  and
other  financial  information included  in  this  report,  fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of  operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,  and  for,
the periods presented in this report;

      4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls  and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act  Rules  13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

           (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us  by  others  within  those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report  is
being prepared;

           (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report  our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls  and procedures, as of the end of the period covered  by
this report based on such evaluation; and

           (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting  that
occurred  during the small business issuer's most  recent  fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely  to
materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal  control
over financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and  I  have  disclosed, based on our most recent  evaluation  of
internal  control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a)    All   significant  deficiencies  and  material
weaknesses  in the design or operation of internal  control  over
financial  reporting  which are reasonable  likely  to  adversely
affect  the  small business issuer's ability to record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

           (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in  the
small   business   issuer's  internal  control   over   financial
reporting.


Dated: December 8, 2004            By:/s/ James Ivchenko
                                   James Ivchenko,
                                   President (Principal Financial
                                   Officer)
EXHIBIT 23.2

             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Saf T Lok Incorporated
1101 Northpoint Parkway
West Palm Beach, FL 33407

Dear Sirs:

We hereby consent to the use in the Form 10-KSB-A Amended Annual Report of Saf T
Lok Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 1999, our report dated March 9,
2000 (except for Note 13, as to which the date is March 28, 2000), relating to
the financial statements of Saf T Loc Incorporated which appear in such Form
10-KSB-A.

                                             GOLDBERG WAGNER STUMP & JACOBS LLP

West Palm Beach, Florida
March 23, 2001
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the period ended March 31, 2010:





1. Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.





Date:  May 21, 2010





/s/ Joseph KozakJoseph Kozak, Chairman, Chief Executive Officerand President





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
#### John Anderson, *Appellant,*v. Ella Anderson, *Appellee.*

Decision Filed May 23, 1923.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; E. C. Davis, Judge.

*497
      *L. B. Baker*and *John Ziegler,*for Appellant;

No appearance for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the appellant, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

All concur.
#### UNIVERSAL BATTERY CO. v. UNITED STATES VESTA BATTERY CORP. v. SAME BASSICK MANUFACTURING CO. v. SAME F. W. STEWART MFG. CORP. v. SAME GEMCO MANUFACTURING CO. v. SAME

[66 C. Cls. 748; 67 id. 711; 68 id. 366; 67 id. 275; Id. 287; 281 U. S. 580]

*792Mr. Justice Van Devanter

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court May 26, 1930.
#### Victor Altman et al. Respondents, *v.*Ambrose O. McCall, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict directed by the court in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action of replevin. The *805defendant was the general assignee of William J. and Peter Bagot, a firm, to whom the goods in suit, consisting of nine capes, had been consigned by the plaintiffs on memorandum, the goods or their value to be returned on ¡November 1, 1896.

Isaac Fromme (Edward W. S. Johnston, of counsel), for appellant.

Joseph Rosenzweig, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

It is claimed on behalf of the appellant that the action should have been brought against him in his capacity as assignee, and not individually. That no demand having been made upon the assignors, the plaintiffs did not show that the transaction was other than a sale. That the court erred in directing a verdict, assessing the value of the goods, and that the form of the judgment is irregular. We have examined all the points urged for a reversal, but find that they are without merit. The action was properly brought against the defendant individually. Hampshire Paper Co. v. Hunt, 9 N. Y. St. Repr. 31.

A demand was not necessary to be made upon the assignors, and the evidence shows that the capes in question were not sold to the defendant’s assignors, but on the contrary came into their possession on memorandum for account of the plaintiffs. There was no conflict in the evidence upon the question of value, and defendant did not ask to go to the jury on that question. The form of the judgment conforms sufficiently to the facts and verdict.

Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., Hascall and O’Dwyeb,, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25048]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on October 21, 2009, 
at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:

    The Commission will consider recommendations to propose 
amendments to the regulatory requirements that apply to non-public 
trading interest, including so-called ``dark pools'' of liquidity. 
The recommended proposals are to: (1) Amend the definition of 
``bid'' or ``offer '' in Regulation NMS under the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') to address actionable 
indications of interest; (2) amend the display obligations of 
alternative trading systems in Regulation ATS under the Exchange 
Act; and (3) amend the joint-industry plans for disseminating 
consolidated trade data.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: October 14, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-25048 Filed 10-14-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### §§ 324.102-324.120 [Reserved]
Order entered December 20, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00820-CV

MAERSK, INC., Appellant

V.

CALEB C. MGBEOWULA A/K/A CALEB MGBOWULA, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-01883-B

ORDER

As directed by this Court, appellant has provided written verification that it 

has paid for the clerk’s and reporter’s records. Accordingly, we ORDER John 

Warren, Dallas County Clerk, and Robin Washington, Official Court Reporter for 

County Court at Law No. 2, to file their respective records within thirty days of 

the date of this order. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Mr. 

Warren, Ms. Washington, and, all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE