alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 367.7 Suspensions. ( a ) The Ethics Counselor may suspend a contractor for any of the causes in § 367.8 using the procedures established in this section.
( b ) Suspension is an action to be imposed when there exists adequate evidence of one or more of the causes set out in § 367.8. This includes, but is not limited to, situations where immediate action is necessary to protect the integrity of the FDIC contracting program and/or the security of FDIC assets during the pendency of legal or investigative proceedings initiated by FDIC, any federal agency or any law enforcement authority.
( c ) The duration of any suspension action shall be for a temporary period pending the completion of an investigation and such other legal proceedings as may ensue.
( d ) A suspension shall become effective immediately upon issuance of the notice specified in § 367.13(b).
( e ) Contractors suspended from FDIC contracting programs are prohibited from entering into any new contracts with the FDIC for the duration of the period of suspension. The FDIC shall not solicit offers from, award contracts to, extend or modify existing contracts, award task orders under existing contracts, or consent to subcontracts with such contractors. Suspended contractors are also prohibited from conducting business with FDIC as agents or representatives of other contractors.
EXHIBIT
31.2




CERTIFICATION




I, Peter
Frugone, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arrow Resources Development,
Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):









a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial
reporting.




Date: August
23, 2010.






/s/
Peter Frugone


Principal
Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3360 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3360

    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the 
      automatic acquisition of citizenship by certain Amerasians.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 21, 2003

   Ms. Lofgren (for herself, Mr. Case, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Ms. 
     Millender-McDonald, Mr. Farr, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
    Abercrombie, Ms. Slaughter, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Emanuel, and Mr. 
  Gutierrez) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the 
      automatic acquisition of citizenship by certain Amerasians.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Amerasian Naturalization Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. AUTOMATIC ACQUISITION OF CITIZENSHIP FOR CERTAIN AMERASIANS.

    (a) In General.--Title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
(8 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 320 the 
following:

      ``amerasian immigrants; conditions under which citizenship 
                         automatically acquired

    ``Sec. 321. A person automatically becomes a citizen of the United 
States when the person is residing in the United States pursuant to a 
lawful admission as an immigrant under section 584 of the Foreign 
Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 
1988 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note), if the person was considered a principal 
alien pursuant to subsection (b)(1)(A) of such section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for the Immigration 
and Nationality Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to 
section 320 the following:

``321. Amerasian immigrants; conditions under which citizenship 
                            automatically acquired.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall 
apply to individuals who satisfy the requirements of section 321 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (as added by subsection (a)) before, 
on, or after such date.
                                 <all>
```
#### ELIZABETH T. PETERS, RESPONDENT, v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., APPELLANT.

Submitted October 27, 1939

Decided January 25, 1940.

For the appellant, *Katzenbach, Gildea & Rudner.*

For the respondent, *David Kelsey (Joseph Fishberg,*of counsel).

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague JJ. 13.

*For reversal*—Donges, J. 1.
#### §§ 324.6-324.9 [Reserved]
#### CHARLES B. SCHEIDER ET AL., EXECUTORS, ETC., PROSECUTORS, v. J. H. THAYER MARTIN, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, DEPENDANT.

Argued October 4, 1939 —

Decided May 2, 1940.

Before Justices Parker, Bodine and Perskie.

*For the*prosecutors, *Charles Danzig (Hood, Lafferty & Campbell).*

For the defendant, *David T. Wilentz,*attorney-general *(William A. Moore,*of counsel).

Per Curiam.

The question in this case is a factual one, namely, whether a transfer in 1927 by the decedent, Henry Scheider, a widower sixty-eight years old, of property whose face value was over $200,000 to a trust company in trust for his five children, •was a transfer in contemplation of death. He died in 1934, and consequently there was no statutory presumption that the transfer, a settlement on his children of some forty per cent, of his estate, was “in contemplation of death.” However, the commissioner, after taking evidence, came to the conclusion that as a matter of fact the settlement was made in contemplation of death; and on appeal to the Prerogative Court, that court, in 127 *N. J. Eq.*323, by Yice-Ordinary Buchanan, affirmed the finding of the commissioner.

Our examination of the case and briefs leads us to the same conclusion, and substantially for the reasons set out in the opinion of the learned vice-ordinary.

*568It is suggested in the brief of respondent that the findings of fact by the vice-ordinary are impregnable in this court if there be any legal evidence to justify them; and this on the theory, as we read the brief, that the Prerogative Court is “not a special statutory tribunal” in an inheritance tax case. But the Court of Errors and Appeals in the case of *In re Roebling,*91 *N. J. Eq.*72, expressly held that the Prerogative Court in these cases is a special statutory tribunal, and that for that very reason its decisions are reviewable only by *certiorari.*An instance of such review on the facts is *Hartford*v. *Martin,*122 *Id.*489, on *certiorari,*120 *N. J. L.*564, and on appeal from this court in 122 *Id.*283. See, also, *In re Fischesser,*14 *N. J. Mis. R.*815, cited by the vice-ordinary in his opinion; and section 11 of the *Certiorari*act of 1903, *Comp. Stat.*1910, *p.*405, now *R. S.*2:81-8.

The decree of the Prerogative Court is affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                              COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the periods indicated below were as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              52 WEEKS   53 WEEKS    52 WEEKS   52 WEEKS   52 WEEKS
                                                ENDED      ENDED      ENDED       ENDED      ENDED
                                               JULY 2,    JULY 3,    JUNE 28,   JUNE 29,   JUNE 30,
                                                2005       2004        2003       2002       2001
                                              --------   --------   ---------   --------   --------
<S>                                           <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges               -----     -----       -----       -----     -----

Deficiency in the coverage of fixed charges
   by earnings (in thousands of dollars)       $12,264    $8,847     $15,702     $80,009   $11,985
</TABLE>

For purposes of calculating the above ratios, earnings are defined as income
before income taxes and extraordinary items, plus fixed charges. Fixed charges
consists of interest expense on all indebtedness, amortization of deferred
financing costs, and one-third of rental expense on operating leases
representing that portion of rental expense deemed by the Company to be
attributable to interest. The ratio of earnings to fixed charges equals earnings
divided by fixed charges.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Back Yard Burgers, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending January 3, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Lattimore M. Michael, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Lattimore M. Michael
------------------------
Lattimore M. Michael
Chief Executive Officer
April 1, 2004
#### EVA N. PERRY, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF RALPH H. PERRY, DECEASED, PETITIONER-PROSECUTRIX, v. *J.*H. THAYER MARTIN, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, RESPONDENT-DEFENDANT.

Argued January 16, 1940

Decided March 4, 1940.

*214Before Justices Bodine and Perskie.

For the prosecutrix, *Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence, Edward J. O’Mara*and *William H. Carey.*

For the defendant, *David T. Wilentz*and *William A. Moore.*

Bodine, J.

This is a motion to strike depositions taken pursuant to a rule of this court in a *certiorari*proceeding to review a decree of the Prerogative Court in an inheritance tax matter. *R. S.*2:81-8 provides for the taking of such depositions in any tax matter. Therefore, it would seem that if the depositions are material to the issues to be determined in this court that the motion must be denied. It is practically admitted that the facts proved by the depositions are material.

Not only does the *Certiorari*act provide for depositions in tax cases, but the practice has been consistently followed as shown by numberless decisions in this state. *Royal Manufacturing Co.*v. *Rahway, 75 N. J. L.*416; *Central Railroad of New Jersey*v. *State Tax Dept.,*112 *Id.*5; *Atlantic City*v. *State Board of Tax Appeals,*123 *Id.*464. Besides, the prosecutor in a tax ease may have a constitutional right to a hearing in this court and an opportunity to present evidence by depositions. *Trenton, &c., Traction Corp.*v. *Mercer County Tax Board,*92 *Id.*398; *Security Trust Co.*v. *Lexington,*203 *U. S.*323; *Hill*v. *Martin,*296 *Id.*393. The legislature might, however, relieve the court of the duty to review facts, providing some adequate and conclusive method was fixed for their determination. *Elizabeth*v. *New Jersey Jockey Club,*63 *Id.*515.

The moving party maintains that an inheritance tax is not such a tax as falls within *R. S.*2:81-8. The act applies to any tax and provides that additional testimony may be taken by any party, the legislative meaning being clear.

The motion will be denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00410

- CV

COBRA ACQUISITIONS L LC and Arty Straehla, Appellants

v.

AL GLOBAL SERVICES , LLC

, Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI22581 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this d ate, the trial court’s June 4, 2019 order granting AL Global Services, LLC’s motion to stay arbitration is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the trial court for entry of an order (1) denying the motion to stay arbitration in its entirety, and (2) orde ring the parties to arbitrate the claims presented in Cobra Acquisition s LLC and Arty Straehla’s May 15, 2019 amended demand for arbitration. It is ORDERED that Appellants Cobra Acquisition s LLC and Arty Straehla recover their costs of appeal from Appellee AL Global Services, LLC.

SIGNED April 22, 2020.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
§ 615.5295 Payment of dividends. ( a ) The board of directors of a bank, association, or service corporation must declare a dividend on a class of stock before any dividends may be paid to stockholders.
( b ) No bank, association, or service corporation may declare or pay any dividend unless after declaration or payment of the dividend the institution would continue to meet its regulatory capital standards under this part.
( c ) Each System bank, association, and service corporation must exclude any accrued but unpaid dividends from regulatory capital computations under this part and part 628 of this chapter.
[70 FR 53909, Sept. 13, 2005, as amended at 81 FR 49777, July 28, 2016]
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF
 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
 
 I, Kee Chan Sin, certify that:
 
 (a)  A review
        of Cellco Partnership’s activities and of its performance under the Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2020 (the “Transfer and Servicing Agreement”), among Verizon ABS LLC, as depositor, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon
        Wireless, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), marketing agent and custodian, and Verizon Owner Trust 2020-C, as issuer, during the period from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 has been made under my supervision.
 
 (b)  To the
        best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Transfer and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021.
 
  By:   /s/ Kee Chan Sin
 Kee Chan Sin
 Vice President and Assistant Treasurer
 Cellco Partnership, as Servicer of Verizon Owner Trust 2020-C
Order entered December 20, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00820

- CV
MAERSK, INC. , Appellant

V.

CALEB C. MGBEOWULA A/K/A CALEB MGBOWULA , Appellee

On Appea l from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 20

- 01883

- B

O RDER
As directed by this Court, appellant has provided written verification that it has paid for the clerk’s and reporter’s record s . Accordingly, we ORDER Joh n Warren, Dallas County Clerk, and Robin Washington, Official Court Reporter for County Court at Law No. 2, to file their respective records within thirty days of
the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to M r. Warren, Ms. Washington, and
, all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
#### §§ 380.40-380.49 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I hereby  certify that,  to my knowledge,  the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), for the quarter ended March 31, 2005:

     1. fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:     May 16, 2005         By:        /s/ Kenneth Ruotolo
                                          -------------------
                                          Kenneth Ruotolo
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  has  been  provided  to the  Company,  and  will be
retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request.
(5 ASOEX AS 9 Amalgam Separator for the Dental Industry Wmdows Internet Explorer ~~~ 

• I@J http://www ~lg~m~s comJ 

x Go gle I amalgamas9.com 

1Jt F~vorites ~ ~ 

v 1·'1 Search • ~ Sh3fe More » 

• ReaiPiayer @:! 

ASDEX AS-9 Amalgam Separator 

ISO 11143 Certified ISO Rated 99.0% 

Single Chairside System 

Portable System/Mobile System 

20000 Manifold Head Assembly $104.00 

MBK-1 Mounting Bracket $ 30.00 

AS-10 Replacement Separator $99.00 

AS10S Complete System Price $ 233.00 

Mounting Space Required 5" x 14" 

Average Life 4-8 Months 

Central Vacuum System 2- 4 chairs 

20000 Manifold Head Assembly 

MBK-1 Mounting Bracket 

AS-20 Replacement Separator 

AS20S Complete System Price 

Mounting Space required 5" x 24" 

Average Life 4-8 Months 

$104.00 

$ 30.00 

$ 198.00 

$332.00 

vl<t X ., GooOe=----------'1 P • 

Sign In ~ • X onvert • Select 
(: ASDEX AS 9 Amalgam Separator for the Dental Industry Windows Internet Explorer GJ rRJ 

0"@ • I@J http:/1~ amalo;I31Tlas9.com, 

x Go gle I arffigarnas9 .com 

.. Favorites [j! 

v I·'J Search .. ~ Share More » 

Piay r @J 

20000 Manifold Head Assembly $104.00 

MBK-1 Mounting Bracket $ 30.00 

AS-10 Replacement Separator $99.00 

AS10S Complete System Price $ 233.00 

Mounting Space Required 5' x 14" 

Average Life 4-8 Months 

Central Vacuum System 2- 4 chairs 

20000 Manifold Head Assembly 

MBK-1 Mounting Bracket 

AS-20 Replacement Separator 

AS20S Complete System Price 

Mounting Space required 5' x 24' 

Average Life 4-8 Months 

$104.00 

$ 30.00 

$ 198.00 

$332.00 

Flow Rate: 1UMN ISO Rated 99.0% 

Replacement Schedule: When vacuum is depleted to mouthpiece 

or 1 year. 

Dispose in accordance with any and all local, State & Government 

guidelines. 

Capsule Technologies Inc 3965 Mearfmvbrook Road St Louis Park MN 55426 

Phone.· 1-952-933-4147 Fax.· 1-952-933-2696 

Email: 

V I •• X L! .::Goooie=c_ _______ __jl p . 

5iQn In ~ ~ X Convert .. Select 

. Internet 4"a .. oo%
§ 390.425 Delayed or continuous offering and sale of securities. Any offer or sale of securities under § 390.411 may be made on a continuous or delayed basis in the future, if: ( a ) The securities would satisfy all of the eligibility requirements of the Commission's Rule 415, 17 CFR 230.415; and
( b ) The association issuing the securities is in compliance with the FDIC's regulatory capital requirements during the time the offering is made.
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epolin, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of the undersigned's knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated:    January 14, 2004    By: /s/ Murray S. Cohen
                              Murray S. Cohen,
                              Chairman of the Board and
                              Chief Executive Officer



Dated:    January 14, 2004    By: /s/ James Ivchenko
                              James Ivchenko,
                              President (Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 390.298 Nonresidential construction loan.

The term *nonresidential construction loan* means a loan for construction of other than one or more dwelling units.