alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 261a.4 Fees. ( a ) *Copies of records.* We will provide you with copies of the records you request under § 261a.5 of this part at the same cost we charge for duplication of records and/or production of computer output under the Board's Rules Regarding Availability of Information, 12 CFR Part 261.
( b ) *No fee.* We will not charge you a fee if: ( 1 ) Your total charges are less than $5, or
( 2 ) You are a Board employee or former employee, or an applicant for employment with the Board, and you request records pertaining to you.
# C_2023179EN.01000101.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2023/C 179/01)

Last publication

OJ C 173, 15.5.2023

Past publications

OJ C 164, 8.5.2023

OJ C 155, 2.5.2023

OJ C 134, 17.4.2023

OJ C 127, 11.4.2023

OJ C 121, 3.4.2023

OJ C 112, 27.3.2023

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-1061-19

ORLANDO ORTIZ, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR BAIL PENDING APPEAL

UNDER TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. Art 44.04(h)

LA SALLE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Appellant was convicted of assault family violence by occlusion in Cause No. 17-05-

00056-CRL in the 218TH District Court of La Salle County. Punishment was assessed at

confinement for 40 years. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction. Ortiz v. State, No.

04-18-00430-CR (Tex. App.– San Antonio, September 11, 2019). The State filed a petition

for discretionary review which was granted and the case is currently pending before this

Court. No. PD-1061-19.
ORTIZ - 2

Appellant has filed an application under Article 44.04(h) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, to set a reasonable bail pending final determination of the appeal. Accordingly,

bail is hereby set in the amount of $60,000, and it is ORDERED that the trial court order

Appellant released from confinement assessed in this cause upon the posting of bail. Any

sureties must be approved by the trial court.

Entered December 9, 2019.

Do Not Publish
§ 607.7 Late-payment charges on assessments. ( a ) If any portion of a scheduled installment of a System institution's total assessment or the reimbursement billed to a non-System entity is not paid by the due date, the overdue amount shall be considered delinquent.
( b ) Delinquent amounts shall be charged late-payment interest at the United States Treasury Department's current value of funds rate published in the Federal Register. Late payment interest shall be expressed as an annual rate of interest and shall accrue on a daily basis starting on the due date of the delinquent amount and continuing through the date payment is received by the FCA.
( c ) The FCA shall waive the collection of interest on the delinquent amounts if such amounts are paid within 30 days of the date interest begins to accrue. The FCA may waive interest due on delinquent amounts upon finding no fault with the performance of the remitter.
( d ) The FCA shall charge an amount necessary to cover the administrative costs incurred as a result of collection of any delinquent amount.
( e ) The FCA shall charge a penalty of 6 percent per annum on any portion of a delinquent amount that is more than 90 days past due. Such penalty shall accrue from the date the amount became delinquent.
AFS

- 14

- 282

- E June 30, 2014

Exemption No. 6140 J Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 200 2

- 12416

Mr. Mark J. Millam Air Transport Association of America, Inc. d.b.a. Airlines for America

1301 Penns ylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004

- 1707

Dear Mr. Millam :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption

No. 6140 , as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect , and li sts
the conditions and limitations

.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 9 , 201 4

, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of Air Transport Association of America, Inc. d.b.a. Airlines for America ( A4A ), for an

extensio n of Exemption No. 6140 , as amended. That exemption from § 121.309(f)(2) of

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows A4A

- member airlines to locate the aft megaphone at door 4

- left on their Boeing 747 aircraft.

In your petition, you indicate that ther e has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Re gister because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to A4A

.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 6140 , as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, A4A is granted an extension to its exem ption from § 121.309(f)(2) that allows A4A

- member airlines to locate the aft megaphone at door 4

- left on their Boeing 747 aircraft

.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 6140 , as amended, to August 31, 20 1 6

, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ John Barbagall o Acting Deputy Director, F light Standards Serv ice
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3124 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3124

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 30, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Geological Survey and 
 the United States Bureau of Reclamation located at 230 Collins Road, 
             Boise, Idaho, as the ``F.H. Newell Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Geological Survey and the United 
States Bureau of Reclamation located at 230 Collins Road, Boise, Idaho, 
shall be known and designated as the ``F.H. Newell Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``F.H. Newell Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
42584.

#### VOYLES v. THE STATE.

Pannell, Judge.

The defendant, on July 20, 1966, was tried and convicted of the offense of automobile larceny. His appeal to this court is based upon the general grounds and alleged error in two charges of the court. *Held:*

1. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the conviction.

2. The defendant's admission that he had possession of the stolen property at a time about one and one-half months after it was stolen, coupled with an admission that he applied for a registration tag four days after it was stolen which application stated that he “purchased” the automobile on the same day it was stolen, was sufficient to authorize a charge on admissions.

3. After receiving the charge of the court, to which no exceptions are taken except as shown in Division 2, and after some deliberation, the court was informed by the foreman of the jury that “we are not clear as to whether or not in your charge you stated to us that if a person is in possession of stolen goods and he is not able to clearly identify where they came from that he is actually therefore presumed by law to be guilty of having stolen the goods.” The court did not give a direct reply to the statement but informed the jury that he would repeat the instruction and stated to them: “Instructions as to recent possession is closely related to the instruction as to circumstantial evidence, so I will give both of those again to you” and “please keep the instructions concerning circumstantial evidence in mind in con*691nection with recent possession because recent possession is circumstantial evidence.” The court then repeated its charge on direct and circumstantial evidence, part of which contained this statement: “The comparative weight of circumstantial and direct evidence on any given issue in this case is a question of fact for the determination of the jury.” He then gave a complete charge on recent possession of stolen goods stating the circumstances under which recent possession would “raise an inference of guilt” concluding with these words: “under these rules, whether there was recent possession of stolen goods, *and whether there should be drawn an inference of guilt therefrom,*or whether the defendant reasonably and satisfactorily accounts for said possession of such goods which is a car in this case, *are matters entirely for you, the jury, to determine.”*The jury did not ask or seek any further instruction. In our opinion, the repeated charge together with the remarks of the trial judge prefacing the same, amply answered the questions in the jurors’ minds as stated by their foreman, and there were no errors in the charge as given or as repeated and the trial judge clearly instructed the jury that the inference arising from the recent possession of the stolen property was one of fact for them to decide and consider rather than an absolute presumption of law. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*

Argued February 7, 1967

Decided April 17, 1967

Rehearing denied May 5, 1967—

*Robert E. Andrews,*for appellant.

*Jeff C. Wayne, Solicitor General, Frank Strickland, Jr.,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 10.1(E)

            TERMINATION OF THE BANK EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      This TERMINATION OF THE BANK EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
("Agreement") is made and entered into as of November 22, 1999 by
and between CFS BANK, a federally chartered savings bank, having an
office at 615 Merrick Avenue, Westbury, New York 11590 (the "Bank")
and PHILIP S. MESSINA, an individual residing at No. 8 Bryan Meadow
Path, Fort Salonga, New York 11768 ("Executive").

                      W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, Executive currently serves in the capacity of Chief
Executive Officer for the Bank and for HAVEN BANCORP, INC., the
Bank's parent company (the "Company"), and as Chairman of the Board
of Directors of the Bank and the Company; and

WHEREAS, the Bank and Executive are parties to the Bank Employment
Agreement, dated May 28, 1997 (the "Bank Employment Agreement"),
and the Company and Executive are parties to the Employment
Agreement dated as of November 22, 1999 (the "Company Employment
Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, concurrently herewith, the Bank and the Company are
entering into the Executive Services Agreement (the "Executive
Services Agreement") whereby the Bank and the Company agree, among
other things, to permit Executive to continue serving in his
present capacities for the Bank and its affiliates and for the Bank
to pay the Company for such services; and

WHEREAS, the Bank and Executive desire to terminate the Bank
Employment Agreement and release each other from the obligations
thereunder,

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for the
promises and mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Bank
and Executive hereby agree as follows:

1.  Bank Employment Agreement Termination.

The Bank and Executive hereby agree that the Bank Employment
Agreement be terminated and of no further force and effect.

2.  Condition Precedent.

This Agreement shall become effective upon the execution by the
Bank and Company of the Executive Services Agreement attached
hereto as Exhibit A.

3.  Entire Agreement; Amendment and Modification.
This Agreement represents the parties' entire agreement and
understanding with respect to the matters set forth herein.  No
amendment or modification to the terms and conditions of this
Agreement shall be made except by a writing signed by each of the
parties hereto.

4.  Counterparts

This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each
of which, when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but
all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

5.  Governing Law.

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of New York without regard to its
principles of conflicts or choice of laws.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed by the
parties hereto the day and year first above written.

CFS BANK


BY:________________________
      Name:
      Title:


___________________________
PHILIP S. MESSINA
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,935
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,310
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,796
<PP&E>                                           3,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,653
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,418
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,505
<SALES>                                          8,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,273
<CGS>                                            3,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,966
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  60
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,138)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        83
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,078)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,221)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                     
<ARTICLE>                            5       
                                                           
<S>                              <C>                       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            OTHER             
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JAN-02-1999       
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-04-1998       
<PERIOD-END>                             JUL-04-1998       
<CASH>                                      12,354         
<SECURITIES>                                     0         
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,969         
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,207         
<INVENTORY>                                 33,585         
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            59,746         
<PP&E>                                       1,816         
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91         
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,576         
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,056         
<BONDS>                                          0         
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0         
<PREFERRED>                                      0         
<COMMON>                                        68         
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,958         
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,576         
<SALES>                                     73,934         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            73,934         
<CGS>                                       54,447         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,948         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0         
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0         
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             320         
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,219         
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,072         
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,147         
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0         
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0         
<CHANGES>                                        0         
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,147         
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.76         
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.72         
                                                           

</TABLE>
#### § 335.401 Solicitations of proxies.

The provisions of the applicable and currently effective SEC regulations under sections 14(a) and 14(c) of the Exchange Act shall be followed as codified at 17 CFR part 240.

[75 FR 73950, Nov. 30, 2010]
exhibit_4-30.htm










Exhibit 4.30


SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC PLANT RODRÍGUEZ II (MURCIA, SPAIN)


Lease Agreements


English summary of the Spanish version1




 


1. Preliminary Note


 


Ellomay has acquired a solar photovoltaic plant called “Rodríguez II”, with an installed capacity of 2,5 MW and located in the Municipality of Lorca, Murcia Region, Spain (the “Plant”).







The site where the Plant is located consists of two plots of land with an aggregate surface area of 50,300 m2 as follows: (i) number 27479, registered with the Property Registry of Lorca, num.1, Volume 2045, Book 1698, Sheet 3 (owned by Comunidad de Regantes de Lorca) and (ii) number 18214, registered with the Property Registry of Lorca, num.1, Volume 1352, Book 1188, Sheet 215 (donated in favor of Mrs. Eulalia Giner Ruiz on August 7, 2014).







There are two lease agreements with respect to the Property, which are registered with the Property Registry of Lorca, as follows:


 


2. Main content of the Lease Agreement with respect to Plot 27479


 



	
1. Execution date

	
November 17, 2011.


	
2. Parties

	
-Comunidad de Regantes de Lorca


-Rodríguez II Parque Solar, S.L.


	
3. Term

	
Twenty five (25) years since November 17, 2011.


	
4. Extension and Renewal

	
The initial term can be automatically extended by successive periods of two (2) years, up to a maximum term extension of sixteen (16) years.


	
5. Annual Rent

	
EUR 980 multiplied by the surface leased per annum.







 









 1 The original language version is on file with the Registrant and is available upon request.


 






  





  











  






 


3. Main content of the Lease Agreement with respect to Plot 18214








	
1. Execution date

	
August 16, 2007, as amended on March 31, 2008, and December 22, 2010 and December 14, 2011.


	
2. Parties

	
-Mr. José Giner Gallego


-Rodríguez II Parque Solar, S.L.


	
3. Term

	
Twenty five (25) years since the date of registration at the RIPRE (November 18, 2011).


	
4. Extension and Renewal

	
The initial term will be automatically extended by successive periods of five (5) years, up to a maximum term extension of fifteen (15) years.


	
5. Annual Rent

	
EUR 5,000 per hectare, annually.


	
6. Easements

	
(i) right of way and (ii) right of easement for the Installation of underground way for electric energy granted in favor of Iberdrola Distribución Electrica, S.A.U.
#### § 619.9020 Agricultural credit banks.

Agricultural credit banks are those banks created by the merger of a Farm Credit Bank and a bank for cooperatives pursuant to section 7.0 of the Act.

[55 FR 24888, June 19, 1990]
#### § 51.3 Notice of appointment of receiver.

Upon appointment of a receiver for an uninsured bank, the OCC will provide notice to the public of the receivership, including by publication in a newspaper of general circulation for three consecutive months. The notice of the receivership will provide instructions for creditors and other claimants seeking to submit claims with the receiver for the uninsured bank.
Exhibit 32.1


              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the IGENE Biotechnology, Inc. (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010,  as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I,
Stephen  F.  Hiu, President of the Company, certify  pursuant  to  18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1).  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act  of
          1934, as amended; and

          (2).   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
          and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 13, 2010                By:  /S/ STEPHEN F. HIU
                                          ___________________________
                                              STEPHEN F. HIU
                                              President


A  signed original of this written statement required by Section  906
has  been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and  furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.