alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0634 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-SW-023-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

               MONROE TAX INCREMENTAL FINANCE DISTRICT NUMBER FIVE
                 AMENDMENT OF PURCHASE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
                            BADGER STATE ETHANOL, LLC


         THIS AGREEMENT entered into as of May 29, 2001, between Badger State
Ethanol, LLC (the "Purchaser") and the City of Monroe, a municipality organized
under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (the "City").

         WHEREAS, the City and Purchaser entered into a Purchase and Development
Agreement dated as of October 11, 2000, a true and correct copy of which is
attached hereto (the "Agreement"), and

         WHEREAS, it is the mutual interest of the City and Purchaser to amend
the Agreement to extend the Date of Closing.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree that the Agreement shall be and
hereby is amended as follows:

         1. DATE OF CLOSING. This transaction is to be closed at the office of
the City's legal counsel on or before the earlier of September 30, 2001 or the
date Purchaser closes on Purchaser's primary financing, or at such other time
and place as may be agreed in writing.

         2. Except as expressly provided by this agreement all covenants of the
Agreement, and any prior amendments or supplements thereto, shall remain in full
force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals
as of the date first above written.

CITY OF MONROE


By:     /s/ William M. Ross, Jr.  [Seal]  By:    /s/ James R. Byers       [Seal]
    ------------------------------            ----------------------------
     William M. Ross, Jr., Mayor               James R. Byers, City Clerk


BADGER STATE ETHANOL, LLC


By:     /s/ John Malchine         [Seal]  By:    /s/ Gary Kramer          [Seal]
    ------------------------------            ----------------------------
     John Malchine, Member                     Gary Kramer, Member and
                                               Chairman of the Board
#### Nicola Sarconi, Appellant, *v.*Tomasso De Falo et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of ¡New York, second district, borough of Manhattan.

O. L. Hoffman, for appellant.

J. Palmieri, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The petitioner alleged actual possession and a forcible entry, and, although there is in the petition an allegation of a forcible holding out, there is none of a constructive possession. It may be that, if the petition had alleged the assignment as of a date prior to the alleged holding out, liberal construction might warrant a conclusion that the petition sufficiently presented an allegation of constructive possession, but as to the time of the assignment the petition is not specific, beyond that it was after May 6, 1899.

There was no evidence of actual possession, and so the final order was right and is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Final order affirmed, with costs.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 2

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 337

[Report No. 108–4] 

To extend certain hydro-electric licenses in the State of Alaska. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2003

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

FEBRUARY 4, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL

To extend certain hydro-electric licenses in the State of 

Alaska.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 337 RH 

1 SECTION 1. STAY AND REINSTATEMENT OF FERC LICENSE 

2 NO. 11393. 

3 (a) Upon the request of the licensee for FERC 

4 Project No. 11393, the Federal Energy Regulatory Com5 mission shall issue an order staying the license. 

6 (b) Upon the request of the licensee for FERC 

7 Project No. 11393, but not later than 6 years after the 

8 date that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission re9 ceives written notice that construction of the Swan-Tyee 

10 transmission line is completed, the Federal Energy Regu11 latory Commission shall issue an order lifting the stay and 

12 make the effective date of the license the date on which 

13 the stay is lifted. 

14 (c) Upon request of the licensee for FERC Project 

15 No. 11393 and notwithstanding the time period specified 

16 in section 13 of the Federal Power Act for the commence17 ment of construction, the Commission shall, after reason18 able notice and in accordance with the good faith, due dili19 gence, and public interest requirements of that section, ex20 tend the time period during which licensee is required to 

21 commence the construction of the project for not more 

22 than one 2-year time period. 

Union Calendar No. 2

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 337

[Report No. 108–4] 

A BILL

To extend certain hydro-electric licenses in the 

State of Alaska. 

FEBRUARY 4, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
§ 208.42 Notice of capital category. ( a ) *Effective date of determination of capital category.* A member bank shall be deemed to be within a given capital category for purposes of section 38 of the FDI Act and this subpart as of the date the bank is notified of, or is deemed to have notice of, its capital category, pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Notice of capital category.* A member bank shall be deemed to have been notified of its capital levels and its capital category as of the most recent date: ( 1 ) A Report of Condition and Income (Call Report) is required to be filed with the Board;
( 2 ) A final report of examination is delivered to the bank; or
( 3 ) Written notice is provided by the Board to the bank of its capital category for purposes of section 38 of the FDI Act and this subpart or that the bank's capital category has changed as provided in paragraph (c) of this section or § 208.43(c).
( c ) *Adjustments to reported capital levels and capital category* — ( 1 ) *Notice of adjustment by bank.* A member bank shall provide the Board with written notice that an adjustment to the bank's capital category may have occurred no later than 15 calendar days following the date that any material event occurred that would cause the bank to be placed in a lower capital category from the category assigned to the bank for purposes of section 38 and this subpart on the basis of the bank's most recent Call Report or report of examination.
( 2 ) *Determination by Board to change capital category.* After receiving notice pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the Board shall determine whether to change the capital category of the bank and shall notify the bank of the Board's determination.
## V E N D O R 

## P R O F I L E

Note: Information is from vendor, however specifications may have
changed. Contact vendor for updates. Water Treatment Catalog and Decision Tool 

### 2 1 2 R e s o u r c e s

Contact Information

Company Name: 212 Resources

Profile: 212 Resources (originally H2Oil Recovery Services) initially

specialized in the reclamation of salable crude oil and fresh water from oil exploration and production tank bottoms, sk im oil and produced water delivered for disposal. They now provide multiple water and hydrocarbon reclamation technologies to the natural gas sector and are primarily focused on a high velocity, turbulent flow mechanical vapor recompression evaporation sys tem

.

Address: 2795 East Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 310, Salt Lake City, UT

84121

Phone: 801

- 924

- 9191

Website: http://www.212resources.com/



### Treatment Technology

Category: Thermal Distillation/Evaporation /Micr obe Removal

Subcategory: Mechanical Vapor Recompression (MVR) & ZLD /UV Light

Technology Name: Vacom Evaporation System

Surface Footprint 2,400 ft 2

Process Description: The Vacom system is based on three operating loops: the first

loop p reheats the feed against the exiting clean water disch arge (recovers “sensible heat”); the second loop circulates the preheated wastewater from a holding vessel to heat exc hanger and back into the vessel; and the third loop is where s team is evacuated with a steam pump an d condenses into clean water. During the process, 100% of the latent heat of vaporization is

recovered. The system can also be integrated with a UV treatment component to aid in biological growth reduction and is capable of Z ero L iquid D ischarge (ZLD)

.

Fe edwater TDS/ % Water Recovery 300 ,000 ppm

, approximately 50 % water recovery Up to 95% water recovery is possible depending on feed water quality

% Waste Stream: 50% at 300,000 TDS

Feed Capabilit y : 2,500

– 3,000 Bbls per day

Costs: $3.0

– $ 5.0 Bbl
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of  CareerEngine  Network,  Inc. (the
"Registrant")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2002
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, George W. Benoit,  Chairman of the Board of Directors,  President,
and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,  certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of the my knowledge:

     1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Registrant.




                                   /s/ George W. Benoit
                                   --------------------------------------------
Date: November 14, 2002            George W. Benoit, Chairman of the Board
                                   of Directors, President, and Chief Executive
                                   Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epolin, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31,  2004,  as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, that:

      (1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and

       (2)   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated: July 13, 2004         By:/s/Murray S. Cohen
                             Murray S. Cohen,
                             Chairman of the Board and
                             Chief Executive Officer


Dated: July 13, 2004         By:/s/James Ivchenko
                             James Ivchenko,
                             President (Principal Financial
                             Officer)
§ 349.26 Supervision. ( a ) *Supervision by the FDIC-supervised insured depository institution.* An FDIC-supervised insured depository institution engaging in retail forex transactions shall diligently supervise the handling by its officers, employees, and agents (or persons occupying a similar status or performing a similar function) of all retail forex accounts carried, operated, or advised by at the FDIC-supervised insured depository institution and all activities of its officers, employees, and agents (or persons occupying a similar status or performing a similar function) relating to its retail forex business.
( b ) *Supervision by officers, employees, or agents.* An officer, employee, or agent of an FDIC-supervised insured depository institution must diligently supervise his or her subordinates' handling of all retail forex accounts at the FDIC-supervised insured depository institution and all the subordinates' activities relating to the FDIC-supervised insured depository institution's retail forex business.
[76 FR 40789, July 12, 2011. Redesignated at 80 FR 74912, Nov. 30, 2015]
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

Application to Amend

Section 333 Exemption No. 11351

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-1081

May 4, 2015

Petitioner:

bizUAS Corp

Bernd Lutz, PhD

CEO

4845 Pearl East Circle, Suite 101

Boulder, CO 80301

Tel: 303.931.4126

Email: bernd@bizUAS.com

Website: www.bizUAS.com

Greetings,

By letter from the FAA dated April 17, 2015, an exemption was granted to bizUAS Corp for relief under 

Section 333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption No. 11351 Regulatory Docket No. FAA2014-1081. 

bizUAS Corp hereby requests that the exemption so granted be amended to include DJI Phantom 3, 

service-drone Recon One, and service-drone Blackbird models. Relevant facts and reasoning are:

 DJI has announced that they will discontinue the Phantom 2 model which was approved in 

bizUAS’ Exemption No. 11351.

 Size, weight and performance specification of the DJI Phantom 3 (“P3”) are substantially similar 

to those of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ (“P2”) in all relevant respects:

o Gross weight: P3=1280g; P2=1242g.

o Diagonal Size (including propellers): P3=590mm; P2=579mm.

o Maximum Ascent Speed: P3=5m/sec; P2=6m/sec.

o Maximum Descent Speed: P3=3m/sec; P2=2m/sec.

o Vertical Hover Accuracy: P3=+/-10cm; P2=+/-80cm.

o Horizontal Hover Accuracy: P3=+/-1m; P2=+/-2.5m.

o Maximum Speed: P3=16m/sec; P2=15m/sec.

 service-drone Recon One and Blackbird are part of the G4 family of industrial-grade, missionproven (in Europe) service-drone multi-rotor UAS. All service-drone G4 UAS use the same flight 

control and RC transmitter category and are built with similar components. The G4 family 

includes the service-drone Eagle V2 which was approved under bizUAS’ FAA Exemption No. 

11351. The Eagle is larger (in terms of rotor diameter and AUW) than both, Recon One and 

Blackbird.

 The findings, rationale and conclusions contained in FAA’s Exemption No. 11351 apply without 

modification to this application to include the DJI Phantom 3, service-drone Recon One, and 

service-drone Blackbird in Exemption No. 11351.
Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any additional 

information that may be required.

Sincerely,

Bernd Lutz, PhD

CEO, bizUAS Corp
§ 3.403 Standards for determination of appropriate individual minimum capital ratios. The appropriate minimum capital ratios for an individual national bank or Federal savings association cannot be determined solely through the application of a rigid mathematical formula or wholly objective criteria. The decision is necessarily based in part on subjective judgment grounded in agency expertise. The factors to be considered in the determination will vary in each case and may include, for example: ( a ) The conditions or circumstances leading to the OCC's determination that higher minimum capital ratios are appropriate or necessary for the national bank or Federal savings association;
( b ) The exigency of those circumstances or potential problems;
( c ) The overall condition, management strength, and future prospects of the national bank or Federal savings association and, if applicable, its holding company and/or affiliate(s);
( d ) The national bank's or Federal savings association's liquidity, capital, risk asset and other ratios compared to the ratios of its peer group; and
( e ) The views of the national bank's or Federal savings association's directors and senior management.
42604.

#### SMITH, Executrix v. BIGGERS.

Pannbll, Judge.

John Biggers d/b/a Biggers Plumbing & Heating Company brought a suit on account against Lucy Griffin Smith, executrix of the estate of David Franklin, in the sum of $2,936.54. The defendant answered, denying the material allegations of the petition, pleaded total failure of consideration and that additional work had to be done by another plumber to correct the work done by the plaintiff at a cost of $1,300, and further pleaded that the plaintiff de*662stroyed or took away plumbing materials of the value of $1,073 and sought judgment against the plaintiff for the sum of $2,703. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $1,400 plus interest. The defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled and defendant appealed on the general grounds and several special grounds. *Held:*

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*

Submitted February 7, 1967 —

Decided April 4, 1967

Rehearing denied April 27, 1967 —

*E. B. Shaw,*for appellant.

*Long & Siejferman, Calhoun A. Long,*for appellee.

1. The evidence .was sufficient to authorize a verdict.

2. The mere insistence upon the recitation of the enumerations of error in the brief does not constitute an argument thereon and they will be considered as abandoned. Rule 17 (c) (2) (111 Ga. App. 891); *James v. Boyett,*19 Ga. App. 157 (2) (91 SE 219); *Phaul v. Macon R.*&c. *Co.,*26 Ga. App. 171, 172 (2) (105 SE 650); *Bell v. Bell,*210 Ga. 295, 297 (5) (79 SE2d 524).

*Judgment affirmed.*
# C_2018146EN.01000601.xml

| 26.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/6

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2018/C 146/04)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 29 January 2018 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 81396 |
| Decision No | : | 013/18/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Region | : | Tromsø Municipality |
| Title | : | Templarheimen II — Aid for the construction and operation of the sports facility Templarheimen |
| Legal basis | : | Municipal decision in case 235/16 |
| Type of measure | : | Investment and operating aid |
| Objective | : | Sports, recreation and education |
| Form of aid | : | Non-repayable grants |
| Budget | : | NOK 179 million |
| Economic sectors | : | Public baths |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Tromsø municipality |
| Rådhuset |
| Postboks 6900 |
| NO-9299 Tromsø |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

29 January 2018

Case No

Case No

:

81396

Decision No

Decision No

:

013/18/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Region

Region

:

Tromsø Municipality

Title

Title

:

Templarheimen II — Aid for the construction and operation of the sports facility Templarheimen

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

Municipal decision in case 235/16

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Investment and operating aid

Objective

Objective

:

Sports, recreation and education

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Non-repayable grants

Budget

Budget

:

NOK 179 million

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Public baths

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Tromsø municipality

Rådhuset

Postboks 6900

NO-9299 Tromsø

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1997 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,488,963
<SECURITIES>                                15,968,923
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,125,912
<PP&E>                                       3,131,802
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,416,568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,878,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,468,492
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,928
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,400,919
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,878,339
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,804,395
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,368,749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,564,354)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,564,354)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,564,354)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.74)


</TABLE>