### 36199 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No. FAA–2014–0013; Airspace Docket No. 13–ASW–33]** 

**Amendment of Class E Airspace; Taylor, TX** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This action amends Class E airspace at Taylor, TX. Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new Area Navigation (RNAV) Standard Instrument Approach Procedures at Taylor Municipal Airport. The FAA is taking this action to enhance the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations at the airport. Airport coordinates also are adjusted.

**DATES :**  Effective Date: 0901 UTC, September 18, 2014. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 1 CFR Part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Raul Garza, Jr., Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone 817–321–

7654.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  History

On April 7, 2014, the FAA published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to modify Class E airspace at Taylor Municipal Airport, Taylor, TX (79 FR 19030) Docket No. FAA–2014–0013. Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received. Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9X dated August 7, 2013, and effective September 15, 2013, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by amending Class E airspace by creating a segment extending from the 6.4-mile radius of Taylor Municipal Airport, Taylor, TX, to 10.7 miles north of the airport, for new RNAV standard instrument approach procedures developed at the airport. Controlled airspace is needed for the safety and management of IFR operations at the airport. The geographic coordinates of the airport are adjusted to be in concert with the FAAs aeronautical database.

The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority as it amends controlled airspace at Taylor Municipal Airport, Taylor, TX.

Environmental Review

The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’ paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). Adoption of the Amendment In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

**PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR**  **TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS** 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p. 389.

**§ 71.1 [Amended]**

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 7, 2013, and effective September 15, 2013, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface.

* * * * *

ASW TX E5 Taylor, TX [Amended] Taylor Municipal Airport, TX

(Lat. 30 ° 34′22 ′′ N., long. 97 ° 26′36′′ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile radius of Taylor Municipal Airport, and within 1.6 miles each side of the 039 ° bearing from the airport extending from the 6.4-mile radius to 11.2 miles northeast of the airport, and within 3.9 miles each side of 021 ° bearing from the airport extending from the 6.4-mile radius to 7.3 miles northeast of the airport, and within 2 miles each side of the

359 ° bearing from the airport extending from the 6.4-mile radius to 10.7 miles north of the airport.

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 17,

2014. Kent M. Wheeler, Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.

[FR Doc. 2014–14904 Filed 6–25–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–14–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE**

**Bureau of Industry and Security**

**15 CFR Part 744**

**[Docket No. 140522446–4446–01]**

**RIN 0694–AG19**

**Addition of Certain Persons to the Entity List; and Removal of Person**  **From the Entity List Based on Removal Request** 

**AGENCY :**  Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.


### 36200 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This rule amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding four persons under five entries to the Entity List. The persons who are added to the Entity List have been determined by the U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States. These persons will be listed on the Entity List under the destinations of China and Hong Kong. There are five entries for four persons because one person is listed under multiple countries, resulting in one additional entry. Specifically, the one additional entry covers one person in China who also has an address in Hong Kong.

In addition, this rule removes one person from the Entity List, as the result of a request for removal submitted by the person, a review of information provided in the removal request in accordance with the EAR, and further review conducted by the End-User Review Committee (ERC).

**DATES :**  Effective Date: This rule is effective June 26, 2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Karen Nies-Vogel, Chair, End-User Review Committee, Office of the Assistant Secretary, Export Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, Phone: (202) 482–5991, Fax: (202) 482– 3911, Email: ERC@bis.doc.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Background

The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to Part 744) notifies the public about entities that have engaged in activities that could result in an increased risk of the diversion of exported, reexported or transferred (in-country) items to weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs. Since its initial publication, grounds for inclusion on the Entity List have expanded to include activities sanctioned by the State Department and activities contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interests, including terrorism and export control violations involving abuse of human rights. Certain exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) to entities identified on the Entity List require licenses from BIS and are usually subject to a policy of denial. The availability of license exceptions in such transactions is very limited. The license review policy for each entity is identified in the license review policy column on the Entity List and the availability of license exceptions is noted in the Federal Register notices adding persons to the Entity List. BIS places entities on the Entity List based on certain sections of part 744 (Control Policy: End-User and End-Use Based) of the EAR.

The End-user Review Committee (ERC), composed of representatives of the Departments of Commerce (Chair), State, Defense, Energy and, where appropriate, the Treasury, makes all decisions regarding additions to, removals from, or other modifications to the Entity List. The ERC makes all decisions to add an entry to the Entity List by majority vote and all decisions to remove or modify an entry by
unanimous vote.
ERC Entity List Decisions
Additions to the Entity List

This rule implements the decision of the ERC to add four persons under five entries to the Entity List on the basis of § 744.11 (License requirements that apply to entities acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States) of the EAR. The five entries added to the Entity List consist of four entries in China, and one entry in Hong Kong.

The ERC reviewed § 744.11(b) (Criteria for revising the Entity List) in making the determination to add these four persons to the Entity List. Under that paragraph, persons for whom there is reasonable cause to believe, based on specific and articulable facts, have been involved, are involved, or pose a significant risk of being or becoming involved in, activities that are contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States and those acting on behalf of such persons may be added to the Entity List. Paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(5) of § 744.11 include an illustrative list of activities that could be contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United
States.

The four persons being added have been determined by the ERC to be involved in activities that are contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States, including the activities described under paragraph (b)(2) and (b)(5) of § 744.11.

The ERC determined that Poly Technologies Inc., Xinshidai Company (New Era Group), and Panda International Information Technology Company, all located in China, and HWA Create, located in China and Hong Kong, be added to the Entity List on the basis of their attempts to procure items, including U.S.-origin items, for activities contrary to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States. The ERC determined that these persons’ activities have included the activities described under paragraph (b)(2) and (b)(5) of § 744.11 of the EAR. Specifically, these companies have attempted to supply items to the People’s Liberation Army and/or to export items to destinations sanctioned by the United States. The Department of State sanctioned Poly Technologies Inc. under the Iran, North Korea and Syria Nonproliferation Act (INKSNA) in February 2013. Xinshidai Company was sanctioned in 2004 by the Departments of State and the Treasury under Executive Order 12938, and again by the State Department under INKSNA in

2008.

Pursuant to § 744.11(b)(2) and (b)(5) of the EAR, the ERC determined that the conduct of these four persons raises sufficient concern that prior review ofexports, reexports, or transfers (incountry) of items subject to the EAR involving these persons, and the possible imposition of license conditions or license denials on shipments to the persons, will enhance BIS’s ability to prevent violations of the
EAR.

For the four persons recommended for addition, the ERC specified a license requirement for all items subject to the EAR and a license review policy of presumption of denial. The license requirements apply to any transaction in which items are to be exported, reexported, or transferred (in-country) to any of the persons or in which such persons act as purchaser, intermediateconsignee, ultimate consignee, or enduser. In addition, no license exceptions are available for exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) to the persons being added to the Entity List in this rule.

This final rule adds the following four persons under five entries to the Entity
List:

China

(1) China Xinshidai Company, a.k.a., the following one alias:

—China New Era Group, Xinshidai Plaza, Plaza No. 7 Huayuan Rd., Beijing, China;

(2) HWA Create, 5/F, Xinshidai Building/New Era Mansion, 7 Huayuan Rd., Beijing, China; and

No. B3 Huayuan Rd., Beijing, China (See alternate addresses under Hong Kong);

(3) Panda International Information Technology Company, Ltd., 7/F, B Tower, Yingwu Conference Center, No. 6. Huayuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China; and

Rm 606 Block B, Beijing Agricultural Science Building, Shugang Garden Haidian Middle Rd, Beijing, China; and


### 36201 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

(4) Poly Technologies Inc., 11F Poly Plaza, 14 Dongzhimen Nandajie, Beijing China; and

27 Wanshoulu, Haidian district, Beijing, China.

Hong Kong

(1) HWA Create, Unit 1001–1002, 10F, Chinachem Building, 34–37 Connaught Rd., Hong Kong; and

Unit A 5th Floor, Cheong Commercial Building, 19–25 Jervois St, Hong Kong; and

Unit B, 6/F, Dah Sing Life Building, 99—1–5 Des Voeux Rd, Hong Kong (See alternate addresses under China).
Removal From the Entity List

This rule implements a decision of the ERC to remove one person, Masoud Est. for Medical and Scientific Supplies, located in Jordan, from the Entity List as a result of the person’s request for removal from the Entity List. Based upon the review of the information provided in the removal request in accordance with § 744.16 (Procedure for requesting removal or modification of an Entity List entity), and after review by the ERC’s member agencies, the ERC determined that this person should be removed from the Entity List.

The ERC decision to remove this person took into account this person’s cooperation with the U.S. Government during the appeal process. In accordance with § 744.16(c), the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Administration has sent written notification to this person, informing this entity of the ERC’s decision to remove it from the Entity List. This final rule implements the decision to remove the following person located in Jordan from the Entity List:

Jordan

(1) Masoud Est. for Medical and Scientific Supplies, 74 First Floor, Tla’a Al Ali Khali Al Salim Street, Amman, Jordan 11118.

The removal of the one entity referenced above, which was made on the basis of a § 744.16 removal request and was approved by the ERC, eliminates the existing license requirements in Supplement No. 4 to part 744 for exports, reexports and transfers (in-country) to the entity. However, the removal of this entity from the Entity List does not relieve persons of other obligations under part 744 of the EAR or under other parts of the EAR. Neither the removal of an entity from the Entity List nor the removal of Entity List-based license requirements relieves persons of their obligations under General Prohibition 5 in § 736.2(b)(5) of the EAR which provides that, ‘‘you may not, without a license, knowingly export or reexport any item subject to the EAR to an end-user or end-use that is prohibited by part 744 of the EAR.’’ Additionally this removal does not relieve persons of their obligation to apply for export, reexport or in-country transfer licenses required by other provisions of the EAR. BIS strongly urges the use of Supplement No. 3 to part 732 of the EAR, ‘‘BIS’s ‘Know Your Customer’ Guidance and Red Flags,’’ when persons are involved in transactions that are subject to the
EAR.
Savings Clause

Shipments of items removed from eligibility for a License Exception or export or reexport without a license (NLR) as a result of this regulatory action that were en route aboard a carrier to a port of export or reexport, on June 26, 2014, pursuant to actual orders for export or reexport to a foreign destination, may proceed to that destination under the previous eligibility for a License Exception or export or reexport without a license (NLR).
Export Administration Act

Although the Export Administration Act expired on August 20, 2001, the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March 8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and as extended by the Notice of August 8, 2013, 78, 2013, 78 FR 49107(August 12, 2013), has continued the Export Administration Regulations in effect under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to carry out the provisions of the Export Administration Act, as appropriate and to the extent permitted by law, pursuant to Executive Order 13222 as amended by Executive Order 13637.
Rulemaking Requirements

1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866. 2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required to respond to nor be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information, subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ) (PRA), unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This regulation involves collections previously approved by OMB under control number 0694–0088, Simplified Network Application Processing System, which includes, among other things, license applications and carries a burden estimate of 43.8 minutes for a manual or electronic submission. Total burden hours associated with the PRA and OMB control number 0694–0088 are not expected to increase as a result of this rule. You may send comments regarding the collection of information associated with this rule, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Jasmeet K. Seehra, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), by email to Jasmeet

_K.

_ Seehra@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to (202)

395–7285.

3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications as that term is defined in Executive Order

13132.

4. For the four persons added under five entries to the Entity List in this final rule, the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) requiring notice of proposed rulemaking, the opportunity for public comment and a delay in effective date are inapplicable because this regulation involves a military or foreign affairs function of the United States. ( See 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). BIS implements this rule to protect U.S. national security or foreign policy interests by preventing items from being exported, reexported, or transferred (in country) to the persons being added to the Entity List. If this rule were delayed to allow for notice and comment and a delay in effective date, then entities being added to the Entity List by this action would continue to be able to receive items without a license and to conduct activities contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States. In addition, because these parties may receive notice of the U.S. Government’s intention to place these entities on the Entity List if a proposed rule is published, doing so would create an incentive for these persons to either accelerate receiving items subject to the EAR to conduct activities that are contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States, or to take steps to set up


### 36202 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

additional aliases, change addresses, and other measures to try to limit the impact of the listing on the Entity List once a final rule was published. Further, no other law requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment be given for this rule. Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are not required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or by any other law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required and none has been prepared.

5. For the one removal from the Entity List in this final rule, pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), BIS finds good cause to waive requirements that this rule be subject to notice and the opportunity for public comment because it would be contrary to the public interest.

In determining whether to grant removal requests from the Entity List, a committee of U.S. Government agencies (the End-user Review Committee (ERC)) evaluates information about and commitments made by listed persons requesting removal from the Entity List, the nature and terms of which are set forth in 15 CFR part 744, Supplement No. 5, as noted in 15 CFR 744.16(b). The information, commitments, and criteria for this extensive review were all established through the notice of proposed rulemaking and public comment process (72 FR 31005 (June 5, 2007) (proposed rule), and 73 FR 49311 (August 21, 2008) (final rule)). This removal has been made within the established regulatory framework of the Entity List. If the rule were to be delayed to allow for public comment, U.S. exporters may face unnecessary economic losses as they turn away potential sales because the customer remained a listed person on the Entity List even after the ERC approved the removal pursuant to the rule published at 73 FR 49311 on August 21, 2008. By publishing without prior notice and comment, BIS allows the applicant to receive U.S. exports immediately since the applicant already has received approval by the ERC pursuant to 15 CFR part 744, Supplement No. 5, as noted in 15 CFR 744.16(b).

The removals from the Entity List granted by the ERC involve interagency deliberation and result from review of public and non-public sources, including sensitive law enforcement information and classified information, and the measurement of such information against the Entity List removal criteria. This information is extensively reviewed according to the criteria for evaluating removal requests from the Entity List, as set out in 15 CFR part 744, Supplement No. 5 and 15 CFR 744.16(b). For reasons of national security, BIS is not at liberty to provide to the public the information on which the ERC relied to make the decision to remove this entity. In addition, the information included in the removal request is specific to information exchanged between the applicant and the ERC, which by law (section 12(c) of the Export Administration Act), BIS is restricted from sharing with the public. The removal requests from the Entity List contain confidential business information, which is necessary for the extensive review conducted by the U.S. Government in assessing such removal requests.

Section 553(d) of the APA generally provides that rules may not take effect earlier than thirty (30) days after they are published in the Federal Register

. BIS finds good cause to waive the 30- day delay in effectiveness under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) because this rule is a substantive rule which relieves a restriction. This rule removes a requirement (the Entity-List-based license requirement and limitation on use of license exceptions) on this one person being removed from the Entity List. The rule does not impose a requirement on any other person for this one removal from the Entity List.

No other law requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment be given for this final rule. Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are not required under the APA or by any other law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. ) are not applicable. As a result, no final regulatory flexibility analysis is required and none has been prepared.
List of Subject in 15 CFR Part 744

Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Terrorism.

Accordingly, part 744 of the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–774) is amended as follows:

**PART 744—[AMENDED]**

■ 1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 744 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; Notice of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 (August 12, 2013); Notice of September 18, 2013, 78 FR 58151 (September 20, 2013); Notice of November 7, 2013, 78 FR 67289 (November 12, 2013); Notice of January 21, 2014, 79 FR 3721 (January 22, 2014).

■ 2. Supplement No. 4 to part 744 is amended:

■ a. By adding under China, in alphabetical order, four Chinese entities; and

■ b. By adding under Hong Kong, in alphabetical order, one Hong Kong entity.

■ c. By removing the heading ‘‘Jordan,’’ and one Jordanian entity, ‘‘Masoud Est. for Medical and Scientific Supplies, 74 First Floor, Tla’a Al Ali Khali Al Salim Street, Amman, Jordan 11118.’’

The additions read as follows:
Supplement No. 4 to Part 744—Entity
List

Country Entity License requirement License review policy **Federal Register**  citation

******* CHINA, PEOPLE’S

REPUBLIC OF

******* China Xinshidai Company, a.k.a.,

the following one alias: -China New Era Group. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER 6– 26–14].


### 36203 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 123 / Thursday, June 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

Country Entity License requirement License review policy **Federal Register**  citation

Xinshidai Plaza, Plaza No. 7

Huayuan Rd., Beijing, China.

* * * * * * *HWA Create, 5/F, Xinshidai Building/New Era Mansion, 7 Huayuan Rd., Beijing, China; and No. B3 Huayuan Rd., Beijing, China (See alternate addresses under Hong Kong). For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER 6– 26–14].

* * * * * * * Panda International Information

Technology Company, Ltd., 7/F, BTower, Yingwu Conference Center, No. 6. Huayuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China;
and Rm 606 Block B, Beijing Agricultural Science Building, Shugang Garden Haidian Middle Rd, Beijing, China. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER 6– 26–14].

Poly Technologies Inc., 11F Poly

Plaza, 14 Dongzhimen Nandajie, Beijing China; and 27 Wanshoulu, Haidian district, Beijing, China. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER 6– 26–14].

* * * * * * * HONG KONG

* * * * * * * HWA Create, Unit 1001—1002, 10F,

Chinachem Building, 34–37 Connaught Rd., Hong Kong; andUnit A 5th Floor, Cheong Commercial Building, 19–25 Jervois St, Hong Kong; and Unit B, 6/F, Dah Sing Life Building, 99—1–5 Des Voeux Rd, Hong Kong (See alternate addresses under China). For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER 6– 26–14].

* * * * * * *

Dated: June 20, 2014. Kevin J. Wolf, Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.

[FR Doc. 2014–14935 Filed 6–25–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–33–P**

**SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION**

**20 CFR Part 416**

**[Docket No. SSA–2009–0027]**

**RIN 0960–AH02**

**Electronic Substitutions for SSA–538**

**AGENCY :**  Social Security Administration.

**ACTION :**  Final rules.

**SUMMARY :**  This final rule adopts, without change, the final rule with request for comments we published in the Federal Register (76 FR 41685) on July 15, 2011. We are revising our regulations to reflect our use of electronic case processing at the initial and reconsideration levels of our administrative review process. We are not changing the requirement that State agency medical and psychological consultants must affirm the accuracy and completeness of their findings of fact and discussion of the supporting evidence, only the manner in which they may provide the required findings and affirmation. This revision will improve our efficiency by increasing our use of electronic resources.

**DATES :**  These final rules are effective June 26, 2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Cheryl Williams, Office of Medical Listings Improvement, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235– 6401, (410) 965–1020. For information on eligibility or filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number, 1–800– 772–1213, or TTY 1–800–325–0778, or visit our Internet site, Social Security Online, at http:// www.socialsecurity.gov

.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Background

We are making final the rules for using electronic substitutions for the Childhood Disability Evaluation Form (SSA–538) we published as a final rule with request for comments in the Federal Register on July 15, 2011. We previously required adjudicators at the initial and reconsideration levels to complete Form SSA–538 in all cases of children alleging disability or continuing disability under title XVI of the Social Security Act. We now provide a Web-based tool that assists our adjudicators in making disability determinations at the initial and reconsideration levels. We use the new tool in electronic cases but do not use it for cases that we do not process electronically. The final rule permitsour adjudicators to substitute the WebVerDate Mar<15>2010 14:44 Jun 25, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM 26JNR1pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES