alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GEORGE E. ABBOTT ET AL., RELATORS, v. E. DONALD STERNER, STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER, RESPONDENT.

Argued January 17, 1940

Decided February 5, 1940.

Before Brogan, Chief Justice, and Justices Donges and Porter.

Por the relators, *Seufert & Elmore*and *Charles Fishberg.*

For the respondent, *David T. Wilentz, William A. O’Brien*and *William J. McCormack.*

Per Curiam.

Motion is made to strike the return to an alternative writ of *mandamus*commanding the respondent to pay into the Court of Chancery the amount of a judgment of the Bergen County Circuit Court in a condemnation proceeding instituted by respondent herein as petitioner, or show cause why it should not be done.

Relators seek to have the *mandamus*under *B. S.*20:1-15 which provides that the amount due may be paid into the Court of Chancery and there distributed to the interested parties. In *Seidler*v. *Ocean City et al.,*109 *N. J. L.*28, it was held that this procedure is at the option of the condemning party only. So, here, it would appear that relators have no standing to compel the payment of, the amount of *50the judgment into the Court of Chancery. It is not now necessary to decide whether relators would be entitled to a *mandamus*to compel payment, as in *Seidler*v. *Ocean City, supra.*Amendment of the writ would appear necessary if that question is raised.

Nor do we think the return should be quashed. Relators assert that they are the owners of the lands in question. The return denies this claim and asserts ownership in another and asserts that relators have no interest in the lands. Thus a dispute of fact is raised by the pleadings. Although leave to take depositions was granted, none have been taken and the disputed questions of fact remain. Relators may proceed with depositions or the better practice is to frame an issue and have the facts determined, either by court or jury. *Horowitz*v. *Civil Service Commission,*10 *N. J. Mis. R.*779; *Phelps*v. *Fort Lee,*15 *Id.*511.

The motion is denied, with costs.
§ 347.101 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) This subpart is issued pursuant to section 18(d) and (*l*) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1828(d), 1828(*l*)).
( b ) The rules in subpart A address the FDIC's requirements for insured state nonmember bank investments in foreign organizations, permissible foreign financial activities, loans or extensions of credit to or for the account of foreign organizations, and the FDIC's recordkeeping, supervision, and approval requirements. The rules also address the permissible activities for foreign branches of insured state nonmember banks, as well as the FDIC's requirements for establishing, operating, relocating and closing of branches in foreign countries.
# C_2022370EN.01000101.xml

| 28.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

27 September 2022

(2022/C 370/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 0,9644 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,28 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4366 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89275 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8533 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9503 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3473 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,661 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 406,65 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7640 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9444 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 17,8240 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4859 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3196 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,5704 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6921 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,3838 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 370,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,2361 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9156 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5280 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 604,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4466 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,933 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,565 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,1235 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,5832 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,5740 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

0,9644

JPY

Japanese yen

139,28

DKK

Danish krone

7,4366

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89275

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8533

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9503

ISK

Iceland króna

139,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3473

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,661

HUF

Hungarian forint

406,65

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7640

RON

Romanian leu

4,9444

TRY

Turkish lira

17,8240

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4859

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3196

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,5704

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6921

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,3838

KRW

South Korean won

1 370,06

ZAR

South African rand

17,2361

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9156

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5280

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 604,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4466

PHP

Philippine peso

56,933

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,565

BRL

Brazilian real

5,1235

MXN

Mexican peso

19,5832

INR

Indian rupee

78,5740

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,329
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,024
<ALLOWANCES>                                    72,611
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,758
<PP&E>                                           7,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 138,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,840
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,063
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   138,063
<SALES>                                        196,257
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               196,257
<CGS>                                          156,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  156,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,702
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,263
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,838
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,425
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,425
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.64


</TABLE>
#### § 602.15 Interest on unpaid fees.

If you fail to pay fees on time, FCA may charge you interest starting on the 31st calendar day following the date we bill you. We will charge you interest at the rate allowed by law (31 U.S.C. 3717) on the billing date.
Exhibit 23.1

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements of
Signal  Technology  Corporation on Form S-8 (file No.  33-78248 and 33-78250) of
our report dated January 26, 1998, on our audits of the  consolidated  financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Signal Technology Corporation and
Subsidiaries  as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years ended December
31, 1997, 1996, and 1995, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.


San Jose, California                                COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
March 27, 1998
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00261

- CR

T YRONE E. G EORGE

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from Criminal District Court

No. 3

of Tarrant County ( 1737689 )

June 13, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial c ourt ’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          Independent Auditors' Consent

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Registration No. 33-93480,  Form S-8 Registration No. 333-15529,  Post
Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8 No. 333-8416 and Form S-3 Registration No.
33-61402)  of  our  report  dated  February  28,  2003,   with  respect  to  the
consolidated  financial  statements and schedule of Storage Engine, Inc. for the
year ended  December  31, 2002  included in the Annual  Report (Form 10-K) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.






/s/ EISNER, LLP (formerly Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP)


New York, New York

March 28, 2003
§ 622.18 Filing. ( a ) *Filing.* Papers required or permitted to be filed with the Board shall be filed with the Chairman of the Board, FCA, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, VA 22102-5090 or with the person designated to receive papers for the agency in a proceeding. Papers sent by mail must be postmarked or received within the prescribed time limit for filing. Papers sent by any other means must be received within the prescribed time limit for filing.
( b ) *Formal requirements.* All filed papers shall be printed, typewritten, or otherwise reproduced, and copies shall be clear and legible. The original of all papers filed by a party shall be signed and dated as of the date of execution by the party filing the same, or a duly authorized agent or attorney. The signer's address and telephone number must appear on the original. Counsel for the FCA shall sign the original of all papers filed on behalf of the FCA. All papers filed must name in the heading or on a title page, the parties, the docket number and the subject of the papers.
( c ) *Copies.* Parties shall file an original and three copies of all documents and papers required or permitted to be filed under this subpart (except the transcript of testimony and exhibits), unless otherwise specifically provided by the Board.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

-------------------------------------------------------------------x

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO,

as representative of

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO et al.,

Debtors.1

-------------------------------------------------------------------x

PROMESA

TITLE III

Case No. 17-BK-3283-LTS

(Jointly Administered)

ORDER GRANTING URGENT UNCONTESTED OMNIBUS MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF DEADLINES CONCERNING SCHEDULING OF MEDIATIONS

This matter is before the Court upon the Urgent Uncontested Omnibus Motion for 

Extension of Deadlines Concerning Scheduling of Mediations (Docket Entry No. __ in Case No. 

17-3283) (the “Extension Motion”).2 Having considered the Extension Motion and determined that 

the bases set forth in the Extension Motion establish just cause for the relief granted in this Order, 

it is ORDERED that:

1. The Extension Motion is GRANTED.

2. The Mediation Scheduling Deadline set forth in the Court’s Procedures is extended 

through and including January 20, 2023.

1 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the last four (4) 

digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax 

Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3284-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK- 3567-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK- 3566-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax 

ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17- BK-4780-LTS) (Last Four 

Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747); and (vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-

BK-5523-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case 

numbers due to software limitations)

2 Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Order have the meanings given to them in the Extension 

Motion.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22862-1 Filed:11/14/22 Entered:11/14/22 18:57:29 Desc:

Proposed Order Page 1 of 2
2

3. This Order resolves Docket Entry No. ____ in Case No. 17-3283.

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______, 2022

___________________________________ 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22862-1 Filed:11/14/22 Entered:11/14/22 18:57:29 Desc:

Proposed Order Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASH I NGTON , 0 C 20460


# JUL 5 - 

# 2011 ::JFFICE OF AIR A D R"OIATiON

Mr. John M. McManus Vice President, Environmental Services American Electric Power Service Corporation 1 Riverside Plaza Columbus , Ohio 43215-2373 Dear Mr. McManus : Thank you for your letter ofMay 12,2011, requesting an extension of the public comment period for the proposed "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) from CoaJ- and Oilfired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-Commercial-Institutional , and Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units " (the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards rule), which was published in the Federal Register on May 3 , 2011. The proposal identified a public comment period of 60 days; that period would have ended on July 5, 2011
. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , however, recently announced an extension of the comment period by 30 days to August 4. While we are extending the comment period, we are not seeking to extend the November 16, 2011, deadline for signature of the final rule, and remain committed to meeting that deadline. The 30-day extension will provide the public with a 140-day period to review the proposal. As you know, interested parties were aware of the posting on March 16, 2011, ofthe signed proposal on the EPA's website (http ://www.epa.gov/ttnlatw/utility/utilitypg.html)
. along with much ofthe pertinent supporting documentation (including the analyses used in establishing the proposed emission limits and the technical support documents). The proposal was published a little over six weeks later, on May 3, marking the beginning of the formal public comment period
. This will provide the public with approximately 140 days to review and provide written comments on the proposed rule and supporting documents
. 

### It will also provide at least 60 days for other documentation that was not posted on the website until after the proposed rule was signed. Due to the substantive issues specific to this rulemaking, this comment period is significantly longer than statutorily required.

loternet Address IUR L) • ht!p Ilwwwepa gov Recyc led/Recyclab l e' Pllnteo wIth Vegetable a,l Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process ChlOrine Free Re y I d Paper

### thank you letter. We look to the timely of your comments. Sincerely,
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3320 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3320

  To improve migratory bird management by the Animal and Plant Health 
  Inspection Service of the Department of Agriculture, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 16, 2003

  Mr. Ross (for himself, Mr. Pickering, and Mr. Berry) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources, and 
    in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To improve migratory bird management by the Animal and Plant Health 
  Inspection Service of the Department of Agriculture, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIGRATORY BIRD MANAGEMENT BY THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.

    (a) Short Title.--This section may be cited as the ``American 
Aquaculture and Fishery Resources Protection Act''.
    (b) Exemption From NEPA.--Migratory bird management activities 
carried out by the Secretary of Agriculture shall be exempt from the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (c) Actions Under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.--An agent, 
officer, or employee of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 
of the Department of Agriculture that carries out any activity relating 
to migratory bird management may take the following actions under the 
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.):
            (1) Issue depredation permits to stakeholders or 
        cooperators of the Service.
            (2) Manage and take migratory birds.
                                 <all>
```
§ 359.5 Permissible indemnification payments. ( a ) An insured depository institution or depository institution holding company may make or agree to make reasonable indemnification payments to an IAP with respect to an administrative proceeding or civil action initiated by any federal banking agency if: ( 1 ) The insured depository institution's or depository institution holding company's board of directors, in good faith, determines in writing after due investigation and consideration that the institution-affiliated party acted in good faith and in a manner he/she believed to be in the best interests of the institution;
( 2 ) The insured depository institution's or depository institution holding company's board of directors, respectively, in good faith, determines in writing after due investigation and consideration that the payment of such expenses will not materially adversely affect the institution's or holding company's safety and soundness;
( 3 ) The indemnification payments do not constitute prohibited indemnification payments as that term is defined in § 359.1(l); and
( 4 ) The IAP agrees in writing to reimburse the insured depository institution or depository institution holding company, to the extent not covered by payments from insurance or bonds purchased pursuant to § 359.1(l)(2), for that portion of the advanced indemnification payments which subsequently become prohibited indemnification payments, as defined in § 359.1(l)
( b ) An IAP requesting indemnification payments shall not participate in any way in the board's discussion and approval of such payments; *provided, however,* that such IAP may present his/her request to the board and respond to any inquiries from the board concerning his/her involvement in the circumstances giving rise to the administrative proceeding or civil action.
( c ) In the event that a majority of the members of the board of directors are named as respondents in an administrative proceeding or civil action and request indemnification, the remaining members of the board may authorize independent legal counsel to review the indemnification request and provide the remaining members of the board with a written opinion of counsel as to whether the conditions delineated in paragraph (a) of this section have been met. If independent legal counsel opines that said conditions have been met, the remaining members of the board of directors may rely on such opinion in authorizing the requested indemnification.
( d ) In the event that all of the members of the board of directors are named as respondents in an administrative proceeding or civil action and request indemnification, the board shall authorize independent legal counsel to review the indemnification request and provide the board with a written opinion of counsel as to whether the conditions delineated in paragraph (a) of this section have been met. If independent legal counsel opines that said conditions have been met, the board of directors may rely on such opinion in authorizing the requested indemnification.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Ketchikan, Alaska, November 18, 2009. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss potential projects under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2008.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held November 18, 2009 at 6 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held at the Ketchikan-Misty Fjords Ranger District Office, 3031 Tongass Avenue, Ketchikan, Alaska. Send written comments to Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee, do District Ranger, USDA Forest Service, 3031 Tongass Ave., Ketchikan, AK 99901, or electronically to Diane Daniels, RAC Coordinator at                         *ddaniels@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Diane Daniels, RAC Coordinator, Ketchikan-Misty Fjords Ranger District, Tongass National Forest, (907) 228-4105.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: October 9, 2009.

Forrest Cole,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. E9-25056 Filed 10-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M