alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 308.127 Scope. ( a ) *Cease-and-desist proceedings under sections 8 and 50 of the FDIA.* The rules and procedures of this subpart, subpart B of the Local Rules and the Uniform Rules shall apply to proceedings to order an insured nonmember bank or an institution-affiliated party to cease and desist from practices and violations described in section 8(b) of the FDIA, 12 U.S.C. 1818(b), and section 50 of the FDIA, 12 U.S.C. 1831aa.
( b ) *Proceedings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.* ( 1 ) The rules and procedures of this subpart, subpart B of the Local Rules and the Uniform Rules shall apply to proceedings by the Board of Directors to order a municipal securities dealer to cease and desist from any violation of law or regulation specified in section 15B(c)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78o-4(c)(5)) where the municipal securities dealer is an insured nonmember bank or a subsidiary thereof.
( 2 ) The rules and procedures of this subpart, subpart B of the Local Rules and the Uniform Rules shall apply to proceedings by the Board of Directors to order a clearing agency or transfer agent to cease and desist from failure to comply with the applicable provisions of section 17, 17A and 19 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78q, 78q-l, 78s), and the applicable rules and regulations thereunder, where the clearing agency or transfer agent is an insured nonmember bank or a subsidiary thereof.
[56 FR 37975, Aug. 9, 1991, as amended at 64 FR 62100, Nov. 16, 1999; 72 FR 67235, Nov. 28, 2007]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE PENNSYLVANIA

INTEREST ON LAWYERS TRUST

ACCOUNT BOARD :

:

:

:

: NO. 226

DISCIPLINARY RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8 th day of Ju ly , 202 2

, Sharon R. Lopez, Esquire, Lancaster

County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Pennsylvania Interest on Lawyers Trust

Account Board for a term of three years , commencing September 1, 202 2

.
Martin, Michael COST)

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Everyone:

'~(AW\'itt\!I U;-

Martin, Michael (OST);,',;I'i2POnTATiON .

Wednesday, August 14, 2013 6:57 PM' >C;:TI O,Ji:R.\TIOi"S

Rich Sewell (rich.sewell@alaska.gov); Uessica.boyle@tananachiefs.org);

art@warbelows.com ZiH3 SfP i j (J, Ii; 52

Essential Air Service proposal at Central and Circle, AK

Warbelow's Proposal for EASat Central Circle - 2013.pdf

I would like to update you on the Essentaila Air Service (EAS) situation at Central and Circle, and give the Alaska DOT and

the community the opportunity to offer any comme,nts on the record before we submit a recommendation to the

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. The current EAScontract expires November 30, 2013, and in

anticipation ofthat, we issued Order 2013-7-9 on July 11, 2013, soliciting proposals from air carriers interested in

providing subsidized EASfor a new rate term beginning December 1, 2013. In response to our request, only the

incumbent airline, Warbelow's, submitted a proposal. I have attached the air carrier's proposal for your review.

We request that you review the proposal and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but no later than

Tuesday, August 27, 2013. Please send your comments directly to me at Michael.f.martin@dot.gov. If you have any

questions, feel free to contact me.

Regards,

Michael Martin

United States Department of Transportation

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP)

(202) 366-6494

1

i
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2962

To prevent the abuse of the illegal drug commonly called ecstasy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2003

Mr. PASCRELL (for himself, Mr. TERRY, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. ETHERIDGE, and 

Mr. CAPUANO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees 

on the Judiciary, and Education and the Workforce, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To prevent the abuse of the illegal drug commonly called 

ecstasy.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ecstasy Awareness Act 

5 of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 2962 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROFITING FROM RAVES. 

2 Section 416 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

3 U.S.C. 856) is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(c) Whoever profits monetarily from a rave or simi6 lar electronic dance event, knowing or having reason to 

7 know that the unlawful use or distribution of a controlled 

8 substance occurs at the rave or similar event, shall be 

9 fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned not more 

10 than 20 years, or both. If the defendant is an organiza11 tion, the fine imposable for the offense is not more than 

12 $2,000,000.’’. 

13 SEC. 3. GRANTS FOR PROSECUTION OF ECSTASY OF14 FENSES. 

15 In addition to any other amounts authorized to be 

16 appropriated for such purpose, there are authorized to be 

17 appropriated to the Attorney General $10,000,000 for fis18 cal year 2004 to make grants to provide training to State 

19 and local prosecutors and law enforcement agents for 

20 prosecution of ecstasy offenses. 

21 SEC. 4. GRANTS FOR EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES TO PRE22 VENT OR REDUCE THE USE OF ECSTASY. 

23 Section 4115(b)(1) of the Elementary and Secondary 

24 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7115(b)(1)) is amend25 ed—
3

•HR 2962 IH 

1 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period 

4 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(E) include activities to prevent or reduce 

7 the use of the illegal drug commonly called ec8 stasy.’’.

Æ
#### § 313.99 Prohibited actions by employer.

The DCIA prohibits an employer from discharging, refusing to employ, or taking disciplinary action against the debtor due to the issuance of a withholding order under this subpart.
[DESCRIPTION] COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME
              PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

EX-11         Computation of Net Income
              Per Share of Common Stock

                                YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                        

                                 1996    1995   1994
                                                     

(Loss)/Income before income taxes
  and cumulative effect of a
  change in accounting principle        $(19,820)      $2,789    $5,862

Provision for income taxes       (8,038)        1,116   2,403
                                                             

(Loss)/Income before cumulative
  effect of a change in accounting
  principle                     (11,782)        1,673   3,459

Cumulative effect of a change
  in accounting principle             -      -      -
                                                     

Net (Loss)/Income                       $(11,782)      $1,673    $3,459
                                                     
 
Weighted average number of
  commons and common equivalent
  shares outstanding              6,296  6,250  6,226
                                                     

Earnings Per Share:

(Loss)/Income before cumulative
  effect of a change in
  accounting principle         $ (1.87)        $ 0.27  $ 0.56

Cumulative effect of a change
  in accounting principle            -       -      -
                                                     

Net (Loss)/Income                       $ (1.87)       $ 0.27    $ 0.56
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.1  


 
 

[Letterhead of PricewaterhouseCoopers]    
  


 
  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS    
  


    As independent accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8 Registration Statements (Reg. Nos. 333-44590 and
333-45070), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 25, 2000 and September 1, 2000, respectively, of our report dated March 5, 2001, except the information
presented in Note 35, for which the date is June 6, 2001, with respect to the financial statements of Pearson plc and of the financial statements included in Pearson plc's Annual Report
on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and to all references to our Firm included in such Form 20-F. 


/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers

PricewaterhouseCoopers

London, England

June 7, 2001 









QuickLinks


[Letterhead of PricewaterhouseCoopers]

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
##### 



Exhibit 10.20
 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
(Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company Marshall Lake Division Shares)
 THIS PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT 2nd August
 RECITALS
 WHEREAS
 
    
    Certificate No. 2630;
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION
 Purchase and Sale
 Purchase Price.
   Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company Marshall Lake Division Assessments, Transfer
Fees, Closing Costs and Other Related Fees




---



##### 



Date and Time of Closing. 10
 Additional Documents and Dry-up Covenant
 Water Court Proceedings
 Sellers Representations and Warranties
 Binding Effect
 Attorneys Fees and Costs.
 Counterparts and Facsimile Signatures.
 Due Diligence.




---



##### 



Valid Decrees
 Abandonment
 Adverse Claims
 No Agreements
 Ownership in Fee; Encumbrances
 No Prior Sales
 Historical Use.
 Notice of Defect; Cure; Termination
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 SELLER:
    
    PURCHASER:ROLAND BURY ESTATE
    
    ELDORADO SPRINGSBy:
    
    By:/s/ Wesley R. Bury, Personal Representative          8-2-07
    
    /s/ Douglas A. Larson                                        8-3-07
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19852-1 Filed:01/20/22 Entered:01/21/22 10:27:43 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                   QUIPP, INC.

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           AND 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350



         I, Michael S. Kady, Chief Executive Officer of Quipp, Inc., a Florida
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:

         (1)      The Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
                  ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                      * * *


/s/ MICHAEL S. KADY
-------------------
Michael S. Kady
Chief Executive Officer

Date:    August 12, 2004
#### § 7.2006 Cumulative voting in election of national bank directors.

When electing national bank directors, a shareholder must have as many votes as the number of directors to be elected multiplied by the number of the shareholder's shares. If permitted by the national bank's articles of association, the shareholder may cast all these votes for one candidate or distribute the votes among as many candidates as the shareholder chooses. If, after the first ballot, subsequent ballots are necessary to elect directors, a shareholder may not vote shares that he or she has already fully cumulated and voted in favor of a successful candidate.

[61 FR 4862, Feb. 9, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 22241, Apr. 24, 2008; 85 FR 83734, Dec. 22, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         16,746
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                      298
<INVENTORY>                                     3,046
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               32,633
<PP&E>                                        323,748
<DEPRECIATION>                                 31,139
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                435,469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          61,509
<BONDS>                                       150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          149
<OTHER-SE>                                    194,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  435,469
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              154,019
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  70,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               74,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              7,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,506
<INCOME-TAX>                                      587
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               919
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      919
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .03
        

</TABLE>
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1669 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# ^Z^ II_E 

# : 1 1 Docket Number: 

# A-98-1 3

Printed 9/23/2008 9:36:49 AM

Sheet 79 of 110P. 2

08/15/0 3 14:2 6 ©1919941023 4 PES RT PN C ]01 3

Contac tRepor t Organi cLiquid s Distributio n NESHA P From : Date : Contact : Company : Bern dHaneke , Pacifi c Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES )

Jun e 23,199 9 Mr . Joe l Fazzio , Environmenta l Complianc e Manage r Intemationa l Mate x Tan k Terminal s (IMTT) , Ne w Orleans , Louisian a Telephon e Number : 504/586-830 0 Fax Number : 504/525-953 7 Contac tSummary : Mr . Fazzi o wa s contacte dt o obtai n informatio n regardin g th e us e o f compressor s a t O.L.D . facilities . Numerou s facilitie s responding t o th e O.L.D . surve y reporte dhavin g multipl e compressors . Infonnatio n regardin g th e us e o f compressor s at

thes e facilitie s i s essentia l fo r th e economi c analysi s require dfor th e O.L.D . MAC T standar ddevelopment . Mr . Fazzi o indicate dtha t compressor s ma y b e use dat O.L.D . typ e facilitie s t o clean/purg e non-dedicate dliqui dpiping/lines . H e als o indicate dtha t HA Pemission s wer e no t presen t i n norma l compresso r

operation , a s tiies e are use dto produc e compresse dai r an d tlierefore d o no t

directl y handl e HA Pliquids . Th e discussio n the n turne dt o pressur e relie f device s a s the y ar e use di n th e O.L.D . industry . Mr , Fazzi o state dtha t pressur e relie f

device s ar e use do n fixe droo f tanks , som e intema l floating roo f

tanks , an dpipelines . PRV' s wer e no t further discussed .
#### § 52.3 Reduced reporting.

A covered depository institution may file the FFIEC 051 version of the Call Report, or any successor thereto, to satisfy its requirement to file a report of condition for the first and third calendar quarters of a year.
#### Matter of Proving the Last Will and Testament of Thomas W. Evans, Deceased.

(Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

January, 1901.)

Surrogate’s Court of the county of New York — Contestants of a will have an absolute right to withdraw their objections, notwithstanding protests of their attorneys.

It has long been the practice of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of New York to permit contestants of wills to withdraw their objections, notwithstanding the protests of their attorneys claiming liens for services..

*568Proceedings upon probate of a will. Motion to overrule objections, etc.

Wolcott G-. Lane, for proponent.

Crane *&*Lockwood, for Edward A. Crane, individually and as executor.

J. Noble Hayes, for David Keane, opposed.

Thomas, S.

It has long been the practice of this court to permit

contestants in proceedings to admit wills to probate to withdraw their objections, notwithstanding the protests of their attorneys claiming liens for services. An unreported memorandum of Ransom, S., states the rule and places it upon the ground that, in probate cases, the surrogate has special powers and duties imposed upon him by the statute, which vest in him the control, to a great extent, of the proceedings, irrespective of the wishes of the parties or their attorneys, and that the rights and interests of other parties require that a contest should not be continued to be prosecuted for the mere purpose of determining a controversy between one of the parties in interest and his attorney. Matter of Peter Wittner, Surr. Decs., 1890, 464. I am not disposed to overrule this decision, and, independent of it, I greatly doubt that the filing of objections to the probate of a will can be treated as the assertion of an affirmative cause of action or as an answer containing a counter-claim such as to require the establishment of a lien by the attorney under section 66 of the Code of Civil Procedure. However this may be, the agreement in writing made by the attorney, Mr. Keane, with his clients, which constituted his authority to appear and contest in their behalf, expressly provided that the parties of the second part, the clients, “ shall be at liberty at any stage of the case, either before, during or after suit commenced, to settle or compromise upon such terms as they may desire as to their respective interests.” This reservation, so explicitly made and assented to, must control, and the remedy of the attorney, which must be against the results of the compromise, must be sought in some other tribunal. These considerations require the granting of the application to strike out the objections and to vacate the order for the examination of the non-resident witness *569to the "will, made upon the footing of the objections. There being now no one before the court entitled to resist probate of the will offered, the application to permit the witness who testified before the commissioner in Paris to sign his deposition before the probate clerk must also be granted.

Decreed accordingly.
#### § 404.35 Procedure in the event of an adverse ruling.

If the court or other authority declines to stay the effect of the demand in response to a request made in accordance with § 404.34 pending a determination by the General Counsel, or if the court or other authority rules that the demand must be complied with irrespective of the instructions from the General Counsel not to produce the material or disclose the information sought, the Ex-Im Bank personnel upon whom the demand has been made shall respectfully decline to comply with the demand (*United States ex rel. Touhy* v. *Ragen,* 340 U.S. 462).

[71 FR 14361, Mar. 22, 2006. Redesignated and amended at 87 FR 41034, 41042, July 11, 2022]
#### City of Miami, Florida, a Municipal Corporation, John J. Quinn, doing business as John J. Quinn & Company, and The Postal Telegraph-Cable Company, a Corporation, *Plaintiffs in*Error, v. Mary A. Firth, a Feme Sole, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion Filed February 28, 1923.

In an action to recover damages for perSonal'injuries, where there is evidence to sustain a verdict for compensatory damages under the declaration, but the amount of the verdict is manifestly excessive, a remittitur will be permitted; otherwise a new trial will be granted.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Dade County; H. Pierre Branning, Judge.

Judgment affirmed, if remittitur is entered.

*A. J. Rose, Hudson & Cason*and *E. B. Kurtz,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*R. B. Gautier,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

A writ of error was taken by the defendants to a judgment for $5000.00 as damages for injuries including a broken arm and other bruises sustained by the *264plaintiff by falling into an unguarded excavation in a street of the city. Technical defenses that might or might not have been available to the city were not duly interposed. There is evidence to sustain a verdict -for compensatory damages against the defendant, and no material or harmful errors appear except that the amount awarded as compensatory damages is manifestly excessive. If within thirty days after the filing of the mandate In the trial court, the plaintiff remits. $2500.00 of the damages awarded, the judgment will stand affirmed for $2500.00 otherwise the judgment will stand reversed for a new trial. Tampa Electric Co. v. Gaffga, 81 Fla. 268; 93 South. 148.

It is so ordered.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne and West, J. J., concur.
#### § 609.945 Records retention.

Records stored electronically must be accurate, accessible, and reproducible for later reference.
14910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 ern Part 39 Cl.

'LOIO-003v

[Docket No. FAA-~-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-llO-ADj

Amendment 39_L3P~~g!*~-04-IO

ROlITlJ<G SVMElO~

RIN 212o-AA64

Ainvorthiness Directives; Airbus Model A380-841, -842, and -861 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments. ,4;";11\-1 =,.

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for th C-.~

m

products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafi

condition as:

During the flight test campaign of the A380-861 model (Engine Alliance

powered), some cracks were found on the Movable Flap Track Fairing

number 6 (MITF#6).

OuTINGSYMOOl

7- ') 10

OliTlNGSY"l l

ANM -IC,

"111AlS1SIG

IT

These cracks were located at the pivot attachment support-ring and at the

U-frame in the attachment area to aft-kinematic. In addition, delamination

has been observed within the monolithic Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic

(CFRP) structure around the pivot support-ring.

This condition, ifnot corrected, could lead to in-flight loss of the

MFTF#6, potentially resulting in injuries to persons on the ground.

* * * * * * *
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Adelphia Communications Corporation (“Adelphia”) on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,William T. Schleyer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Adelphia, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Adelphia.
| Date: November 14, 2006 | /s/ William T. Schleyer |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|
|                    |                    | William T. Schleyer |
|                    |                    | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----