alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

In re:

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT 

BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

As representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et. al.

Debtor

____________________________________________

LUIS A. RIVERA SIACA

Movant

v.

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT 

BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO 

As representative of 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et. al. 

Debtor

PROMESA Title III

No. 17-03283-LTS

(Jointly administered)

Re: ECF No. 22166

Department of Education of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

ORDER

The Court has considered Luis A. Rivera Siaca’s (“Rivera Siaca”) Motion Submitting Certified 

Translations and for Entry of Order, and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby directed that the Lease 

Agreement entered on January 15, 2021 between the Department of Education of Puerto Rico and Rivera Siaca 

with its certified translation to the English language; and the Certification of the Lease Agreement issued by 

the Office of the Comptroller of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico with its certified translation to the English 

language be made part of the record of this case.

Dated: _______________________, 2022

____________________________

Honorable Laura Taylor Swain

United States District Judge

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22338-5 Filed:09/21/22 Entered:09/21/22 11:42:19 Desc:

Proposed Order Page 1 of 1
#### § 251.5 No evasion.

A financial company may not organize or operate its business or structure any acquisition of or merger or consolidation with another company in such a manner that results in evasion of the concentration limit established by section 14 of the Bank Holding Company Act or this part.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS


ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of ANTs software
inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for the period ended September 30,
2009:





1.      Fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




This
certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be
deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any
purpose whatsoever.





Date:
November 23, 2009








/s/Joseph
      KozakJoseph Kozak,
      Chairman, Chief Executive Officerand
      President




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the
Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request.
Consent of Independent Auditors

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 Registration  No. 33-93480)  pertaining to the 1989 Stock Option Plan,
as amended (the "Option  Plan");  the 1995  Employee  Stock  Purchase  Plan (the
"Purchase  Plan");  and 306,000 shares  issuable under certain  options  granted
outside the Option Plan in February  1995 (the  "February  1995  Options");  the
Registration  Statement (Form S-8 Registration No. 333-15529)  pertaining to the
1996 Non-Employee  Directors Stock Option Plan (the "Non-Employee Plan") and the
1996  Stock  Plan  (the  "Stock  Plan")  and the  Registration  Statement  (Post
Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8/S-8  Registration No. 333-8416) pertaining
to  the  Option  Plan;  the  Purchase  Plan;  the  February  1995  Options;  the
Non-Employee  Plan; the Stock Plan;  298,848 shares  issuable under that certain
warrant  granted in December 1994;  90,000 shares issuable under certain options
granted  outside the Option Plan,  the Stock Plan and the  Non-Employee  Plan in
June 1996;  10,000 shares  issuable under certain  options  granted  outside the
Option Plan,  the Stock Plan and the  Non-Employee  Plan in December  1996;  and
498,400 shares  issuable under certain  options granted outside the Option Plan,
the Stock Plan and the  Non-Employee  Plan in February  1998 of our report dated
February 6, 1998,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
schedule of ECCS,  Inc.  included in the Annual  Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1997 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.






                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP


MetroPark, New Jersey
March 20, 1998
Exhibit 10.1


June 16, 2000


AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
444 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Attn:  Denis J. Fitzpatrick

Re:      TAD Purchase Agreement Dated June 1, 1999 (the "Agreement")


Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick:

By this  letter,  it is  hereby  understood  and  agreed  that  the  term of the
above-referenced  Agreement is extended to June 30, 2001.  In  consideration  of
this extension,  American  International  Petroleum Corp.  ("AIP") agrees by its
confirmation  below that it shall provide an additional  300,000  shares of its'
common stock, which shall be registered  pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933,
to Actrade Capital,  Inc. ("Actrade") on or before August 15, 2000 as additional
security and  collateral  for the payment of all TADs purchased by Actrade under
the Agreement.  All  representations,  warranties and obligations of each of the
parties under the Agreement are extended, reconfirmed and shall remain in effect
until December 31, 2001. Furthermore,  all corporate guarantees and liens issued
in favor of Actrade  pursuant to the  Agreement  shall  continue to be valid and
extended of record until Actrade has received good, collected funds for the full
amount owed to it by reason of its purchase of TADs issued under the  Agreement.
AIP, American International Refinery, Inc., American International Marine, Inc.,
and St. Marks  Refinery,  Inc. shall all cooperate  fully with Actrade and shall
duly execute any and all documents  necessary to accomplish  the purpose of this
letter.

Sincerely yours,


By:
   ------------------------------------


The terms of this letter are confirmed by:
American International Petroleum Corp.     American International Refinery, Inc.


By:                                        By:
   -------------------------------            ----------------------------------




American International Marine, Inc.        St. Mark's Refinery, Inc.


By:                                        By:
   -------------------------------            ----------------------------------


                                       9
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2023 Fiscal Transparency Report…Zambia

# 					2023 Fiscal Transparency Report: Zambia			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Zambia 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Zambia

During the review period, the government made its executive budget proposal, enacted budget, and end-of-year report accessible to the public, including online.  Publicly available budget documents provided a substantially complete picture of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue, including financial allocations to and earnings from major state-owned enterprises.  Information on debt obligations, including major state-owned enterprise debt, was publicly available.  Actual revenues and expenditures reasonably corresponded to those in the enacted budget, and budget documents were comparable year-to-year.  The supreme audit institution did not meet international standards of independence and did not audit the entire annual executed budget.  The government specified in law or regulation but did not appear to always follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses.  The government published basic information on natural resource extraction awards.

Zambia’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Ensuring the supreme audit institution meets international standards of independence and audits the entire annual executed budget; and

- Following laws and regulations for awarding natural resource licenses in practice.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Zambia 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentZambia

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
§ 627.40 Voluntary liquidation. ( a ) A Farm Credit institution may voluntarily liquidate by a resolution of its board of directors, but only with the consent of, and in accordance with a plan of liquidation approved by, the Farm Credit Administration Board. Upon adoption of such resolution to liquidate, the Farm Credit institution shall submit the proposed voluntary liquidation plan to the Farm Credit Administration for preliminary approval. The Farm Credit Administration Board, in its discretion, may appoint a receiver as part of an approved liquidation plan. If a receiver is appointed for the Farm Credit institution as part of a voluntary liquidation, the receivership shall be conducted pursuant to subpart C of this part, except to the extent that an approved plan of liquidation provides otherwise.
( b ) If the Farm Credit Administration Board gives preliminary approval to the liquidation plan, the board of directors of the Farm Credit institution shall submit the resolution to liquidate and the liquidation plan to the stockholders for approval.
( c ) The resolution to liquidate and the liquidation plan shall be approved by the stockholders if agreed to by at least a majority of the voting stockholders of the institution voting, in person or by written proxy, at a duly authorized stockholders' meeting.
( d ) The Farm Credit Administration Board will consider final approval of the liquidation plan after an affirmative stockholder vote on the resolution to liquidate.
( e ) Any subsequent amendments, modifications, revisions, or adjustments to the liquidation plan shall require Farm Credit Administration Board approval.
( f ) The Farm Credit Administration Board, in its discretion, reserves the right to terminate or modify the liquidation plan at any time.
[63 FR 5725, Feb. 4, 1998. Redesignated and amended at 88 FR 82246, Nov. 24, 2023]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40089

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SERVANDO CALLEJA-SABINO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:17-CR-514-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Servando Calleja-Sabino has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Calleja-Sabino has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 6, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40089 Document: 00514631289 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2018
No. 18-40089

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-40089 Document: 00514631289 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/06/2018
42781, 42782.

#### KENNESAW LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY v. FLANIGAN (two cases).

Submitted May 4, 1967 —

Decided May 19, 1967

Rehearing denied June 6, 1967 —

*Jones ■& Kemp, Charles M. Jones,*for appellant.

*L. H. Hilton,*for appellees.

Jordan, Presiding Judge.

Construing the petitions as amended against the pleaders, the amendments as above stated only serve to emphasize the fact, as shown by the original petitions, that whatever representations were made preceded the execution of *819an application form, and were used as an inducement to each of the plaintiffs to execute and deliver to the defendant an application or subscription to what each plaintiff believed was an investment program. The petitions are still silent as to any fraud perpetrated by the defendant which prevented either plaintiff from ascertaining the contents of the application form which he or she signed, and also silent as to any difference in what the application form called for and what was actually delivered, as distinguished from what the agent represented each plaintiff would receive upon executing the application, and what was actually delivered. From aught that appears, the plaintiffs received contracts in accordance with their applications. Under these circumstances the petitions show no actionable fraud and thus fail to state a cause of action. See *Skene v. Jones,*111 Ga. App. 615 (142 SE2d 412).

The plaintiffs rely mainly upon the rules recognized and applied in *Bankers Fidelity Life Ins. Co. v. Morgan,*104 Ga. App. 894, 897 (123 SE2d 433), and *Coral Gables Corp. v. Hamilton,*168 Ga. 182 (8) (147 SE 494), and similar cases. In the *Bankers Fidelity*case counsel conceded that former *Code*§ 56-519, which imposed a statutory liability, was applicable and controlling, and the case, which involved an insurance investment program similar to that shown in the present case, was decided on the basis of that statute. There appears to be no similar applicable provision under the current insurance law of this State. The general principles recognized and applied under the facts of the *Coral Gables*case do not require an affirmance of the ruling of the lower court in the present cases, in view of the deficiencies in the petitions as noted above. For further discussion of the distinctions between actionable fraud and other misrepresentations, see *Vaughan v. Oxenborg,*105 Ga. App. 295, 298 (124 SE2d 436); *Clinton v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,*110 Ga. App. 417, 420 (138 SE2d 687); *Adamson v. Maddox,*111 Ga. App. 533, 535 (142 SE2d 313); *Holbrook v. Capital Auto. Co.,*111 Ga. App. 601 (142 SE2d 288); *Skene v. Jones,*111 Ga. App. 615, supra; Cohen v. The Pullman Company, 243 F2d 725.

No cause of action being shown, the trial judge erred in overruling the general demurrers to the petitions as amended.

*Judgments reversed.*

*Been and Quillian, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,169
<SECURITIES>                                    26,158
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,515
<ALLOWANCES>                                       237
<INVENTORY>                                      5,069
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,088
<PP&E>                                          11,901
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,128
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,453
<SALES>                                         44,316
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,316
<CGS>                                           18,144
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,674
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,717
<INCOME-TAX>                                       869
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,848
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,848
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30<F1>
<FN>
<F1> Net income per share for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1997 has been 
restated to conform to SFAS 128. Primary and fully diluted net income per share
computed under the provisions of APB 15 was historically reported as $0.30 and
$0.30 per share, respectively.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit A 

Schedule of Claims Subject to Three Hundred Sixty-Eighth Omnibus Objection 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22480-1 Filed:10/04/22 Entered:10/04/22 11:48:44 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 3
Three Hundred and Sixty-Eighth Omnibus Objection

Exhibit A - Satisfied Claims

NAME DATE FILED DEBTOR CLAIM #

ASSERTED CLAIM 

CASE NUMBER AMOUNT

 1 COLON RIVERA, PAOLA 05/02/2018 17 BK 03283-LTS Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 10025 $1,309.00

HC 5 BOX 6174

AGUAS BUENAS, PR 00703

Reason: Proof of Claim asserts liability on the basis of a tax refund/return. The records of the Department of Treasury show such refund/return has been fully satisfied, pursuant to 

Direct Deposit dated 06/01/2017.

 2 SEDA ARROYO, EDGARDO 05/11/2018 17 BK 03283-LTS Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 14364 $8,629,632.29

#35299-054, USP.

FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL U.S.P.

P.O. BOX 33

TERRE HAUTE, IN 47808

Reason: Proof of Claim asserts liability on the basis of unclaimed property in the amount of $8,629,632.29. Claimant is asserting liability for the entire amount transferred to the OCIF 

instead of just the amount related to the creditor. Creditors portion of the amount transferred was $8,573.89. The amount due to the creditor was partially applied, in the amount of 

$6,125.12, to an unpaid tax debt. The balance due on account of the unclaimed property, in the amount of $2,448.77, was satisfied pursuant to check number 03324690, dated 

10/20/2015.

TOTAL $8,630,941.29

1

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22480-1 Filed:10/04/22 Entered:10/04/22 11:48:44 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 3
3Three Hundred and Sixty-Eighth Omnibus Objection

Exhibit A - Partially Satisfied Claims

NAME DATE FILED DEBTOR CLAIM #

ASSERTED CLAIM 

CASE NUMBER AMOUNT

 1 HAUCK, TODD 05/04/2018 17 BK 03283-LTS Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 9269 $5,000.00

9306 LAKESIDE TRAIL

CHAMPLIN, MN 55316

Reason: Proof of claim and supporting documentation asserts an ownership interest in an escheated bearer bond issued by the Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 

bearing CUSIP 745194JY7 in an unspecified amount. Claimant concedes, and the records of the Department of Treasury demonstrate such claim has been fully satisfied, pursuant to 

check number 00142381 dated 05/03/2017. Proof of claim and supporting documentation asserts an ownership interest in an escheated bearer bond issued by the Puerto Rico Water 

Resources Authority, portion which remains at the Commonwealth.

TOTAL $5,000.00

1

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22480-1 Filed:10/04/22 Entered:10/04/22 11:48:44 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 3 of 3
§ 4.39 Notification of parties and procedures for sharing and using OCC records in litigation. ( a ) *Responsibility of litigants to notify parties of a request for testimony.* Upon submitting a request to the OCC for the testimony of an OCC employee or former OCC or OTS employee, the requester shall notify all other parties to the case that a request has been submitted.
( b ) *Responsibility of litigants to share released records.* The requester shall promptly notify other parties to a case of the release of non-public OCC information obtained pursuant to this subpart, and, upon entry of a protective order, shall provide copies of OCC information, including OCC information obtained pursuant to § 4.15, to the other parties.
( c ) *Retrieval and destruction of released records.* At the conclusion of an action: ( 1 ) The requester shall retrieve any non-public OCC information from the court's file as soon as the court no longer requires the information;
( 2 ) Each party shall destroy the non-public OCC information covered by the protective order; and
( 3 ) Each party shall certify to the OCC that the non-public OCC information covered by the protective order has been destroyed.
( d ) *Authentication for use as evidence.* Upon request, the OCC authenticates released records to facilitate their use as evidence. Requesters who require authenticated records or certificates of nonexistence of records should, as early as possible, request certificates from the OCC's Litigation Division pursuant to § 4.34(a).
[60 FR 57322, Nov. 15, 1995. Redesignated at 63 FR 62929, Nov. 10, 1998; 76 FR 43563, July 21, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         549,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               549,350
<PP&E>                                       4,668,436
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,435,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,811,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          591,722
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0<F1>
<COMMON>                                             0<F2>
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,219,493<F1><F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,811,215
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               190,932
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               144,226
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,385
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.98<F2><F4>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Refers to general partners and limited partners capital.
<F2>95% limited partners - interest outstanding.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>