alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3345 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3345

To enhance the public safety by rendering aliens ineligible to receive 
visas and ineligible for admission to the United States if their entry 
      poses a danger to national security, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2003

  Mr. Flake introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To enhance the public safety by rendering aliens ineligible to receive 
visas and ineligible for admission to the United States if their entry 
      poses a danger to national security, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Inadmissiblity of National Security 
Aliens Act''.

SEC. 2. INADMISSIBILITY OF PERSONS POSING NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT.

    Section 212(a)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1182(a)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(G) National security threat.--Any alien whose 
                entry or proposed activities in the United States the 
                Secretary of State or the Secretary of Homeland 
                Security, in consultation with appropriate heads of 
                other executive branch agencies, has reason to believe 
                would pose a danger to the national security (as 
                defined in section 219(c)(2)) is inadmissible.''.
                                 <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEquivalent plate analysis of aircraft wing box structures with general planform geometryA new equilvalent plate analysis formulation is described which is capable of modeling aircraft wing structures with a general planform such as cranked wing boxes. Multiple trapezoidal segments are used to represent such planforms. A Ritz solution technique is used in conjunction with global displacement functions which encompass all the segments. This Ritz solution procedure is implemented efficiently into a computer program so that it can be used by rigorous optimization algorithms for application in early preliminary design. A direct method to interface this structural analysis procedure with aerodynamic programs for use in aeroelastic calculations is described. This equivalent plate analysis procedure is used to calculate the static deflections and stresses and vibration frequencies and modes of an example wing configuration. The numerical results are compared with results from a finite element model of the same configuration to illustrate typical levels of accuracy and computation times resulting from use of this procedure.Document ID19860012483Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsGiles, G. L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1986Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:87697AIAA PAPER 86-0940-CPNASA-TM-87697Meeting InformationMeeting: AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ANS Stuctures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference,Location: San Antonio, TXCountry: United StatesStart Date: May 19, 1986End Date: May 21, 1986Accession Number86N21954Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-11-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860012483.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 608.805 Responsibility for collection. ( a ) The collection of claims shall be aggressively pursued in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended, the joint regulations issued under that Act, and these regulations. Debts owed to the United States, together with charges for interest, penalties, and administrative costs, should be collected in one lump sum unless otherwise provided by law. If a debtor requests installment payments, the debtor, as requested by the FCA, shall provide sufficient information to demonstrate that the debtor is unable to pay the debt in one lump sum. When appropriate, the FCA shall arrange an installment payment schedule. Claims which cannot be collected directly or by administrative offset shall be either written off as administratively uncollectible or referred to the General Counsel for further consideration.
( b ) The Chairman, or designee of the Chairman, may compromise claims for money or property arising out of the activities of the FCA, where the claim (exclusive of charges for interest, penalties, and administrative costs) does not exceed $100,000. When the claim exceeds $100,000 (exclusive of charges for interest, penalties, and administrative costs), the authority to accept a compromise rests solely with the Department of Justice. The standards governing the compromise of claims are set forth in 4 CFR part 103.
( c ) The Chairman, or designee of the Chairman, may suspend or terminate the collection of claims which do not exceed $100,000 (exclusive of charges for interest, penalties, and administrative costs) after deducting the amount of any partial payments or collections. If, after deducting the amount of any partial payments or collections, a claim exceeds $100,000 (exclusive of charges for interest, penalties, and administrative costs), the authority to suspend or terminate rests solely with the Department of Justice. The standards governing the suspension or termination of claim collections are set forth in 4 CFR part 104.
( d ) The FCA shall refer claims to the Department of Justice for litigation or to the General Accounting Office (GAO) for claims arising from audit exceptions taken by the GAO to payments made by the FCA in accordance with 4 CFR part 105.
Exhibit 21
                      THERMOLASE CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES
    As of November 19, 1998, the Registrant owned the following subsidiaries:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

     <S>                                               <C>                <C> 
                                                       STATE OR
                                                       JURISDICTION OF    PERCENT OF 
                      NAME                             INCORPORATION       OWNERSHIP
     Creative Beauty Innovations, Inc.                 Texas                  100
     The Greenhouse Spa, Inc.                          Pennsylvania           100
     ThermoLase England L.L.C.                         Delaware                50*
         ThermoLase UK Limited                         United Kingdom         100
     ThermoLase France L.L.C.                          Delaware                71*
         ThermoDess S.A.S.                             France                  71*
     ThermoLase International L.L.C.                   Delaware                35*
     ThermoLase Japan L.L.C.                           Wyoming                 50*
         Thira Japan, Inc.                             Japan                  100
</TABLE>
 
* Joint Venture/Partnership
#### § 603.345 Fees for providing copies of records.

Fees for providing copies of records shall be charged in accordance with §§ 602.11 and 602.12 of this chapter.

[40 FR 40454, Sept. 2, 1975, as amended at 56 FR 28479, June 21, 1991; 71 FR 54900, Sept. 20, 2006]
§ 313.184 Collection of civil money penalty debt. ( a ) The FDIC will follow Department of Treasury regulations set forth at 31 CFR part 285, as applicable and consistent with this subpart, for the collection of civil money penalty debt, including centralized offset of Federal payments to collect non-tax debts that may be owed to the FDIC, under 31 CFR 285.5.
( b ) Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to require the FDIC to provide duplicate notice or other procedural protections that have already been provided or afforded to a civil money penalty debtor in the course of administrative or judicial litigation or otherwise.
( c ) For civil money penalty debtors, and for purposes of 31 U.S.C. 3716(b)(1), the FDIC adopts without change the regulations on collection by administrative offset set forth at 31 CFR 901.3 and other relevant sections of the Federal Claims Collection Standards applicable to such offset, to the extent those regulations are consistent with this subpart.
( d ) Nothing in this subpart precludes the collection of debts through any other available means or precludes the FDIC from engaging in litigation or the compromise of debt as provided under 12 U.S.C. 1818(i) or any other applicable law or regulation.
§ 390.293 Immediate family. The term *immediate family* of any natural person means the following (whether by the full or half blood or by adoption): ( a ) Such person's spouse, father, mother, children, brothers, sisters, and grandchildren;
( b ) The father, mother, brothers, and sisters of such person's spouse; and
( c ) The spouse of a child, brother, or sister of such person.
#### Jeanne Renoux, Appellant, *v.*Hippolyte A. Geney, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, first district, borough of Manhattan.

I. H. Harris, for appellant.

C. A. Terry, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Upon the trial the defendant was allowed over objection and exception to disclose communications made by his client to him and his advice given thereon in the course of his professional employment. This disclosure was contrary to section 835 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The evidence was offered' for the purpose of aiding the defendant in his contention and it may have done so. Therefore, the judgment is reversed, and a new trial is ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Present: Tbuax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
9 a .,_ !/ EPA meeting Aug. 16, 2012 10:40am 

r ~ e: t::rl'lcet n~ cl c ,·f / z efl 

My name is Robert Portman Jr. and I address you as a retired pediatrician and 44 year citizen of 

)I 

Arlington, Texas. 

The reported rate of asthma in the US. is 13 to 20 children per 100 children. 

The reported rate of asthma here in To/!~f C:9.lJntv and the five surrounding coun i s is higt)er than · _. 1 ) t J; -; ;~ e j(J 8., ~-"" h. ()..~><- r-e. Ferre -t-&P .. S 

the nat1onal average. 1 A e o~- u Y :he> c.ltVi t . .J ,... e

11 s 1/"'A I r 1.. ~ ~ s- e s ~ ... -f sur ve.. ( 

- The largest asthma survey in the U.S. was done by Cook Children's Hospital in Ft. Worth, Texas in 

2008. 

This home based study was mailed out to parents in six counties. That study showed a high overall 

asthma rate of 18.1% and an even higher asthma rate in 5 to 9 year old children at 25%. 

The statistician found that the higher the particulate matter is in the air the higher the frequency of 

asthma attacks that are triggered. There are multiple triggers for asthma attacks. 

In summary, there are an increased number of children in this area that are experiencing asthma 

attacks and decreased quality of life. 

These children deserve your best air pollution controls. 

They will continue to experience increased risk from asthma if you do not put your best standards in 

place.
# L_2021318EN.01000301.xml

| 9.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/3

---

Corrigendum to EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision of 21 April 2021 regarding approval of disease-free and non-vaccination statuses and eradication programmes of Norway and Iceland or certain zones or compartments thereof as regards certain listed diseases in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/689 [2021/1332]

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 290 of 12 August 2021
  )

On the cover page, and on page 5, in the title:

for:

‘EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision of 21 April 2021 regarding approval of disease-free and non-vaccination statuses and eradication programmes of Norway and Iceland or certain zones or compartments thereof as regards certain listed diseases in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/689 [2021/1332]’,

read:

‘EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 32/21/COL of 21 April 2021 regarding approval of disease-free and non-vaccination statuses and eradication programmes of Norway and Iceland or certain zones or compartments thereof as regards certain listed diseases in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/689 [2021/1332]’.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Justice.gov 
-  About 
-  Budget and Performance 

# Budget and Performance

                      -  Facebook 
                      -  X 
                      -  LinkedIn 
                      -  Email 

### Office of the Inspector General Reports

Inspector General Audits/Reports | Reporting Evidences of Waste, Fraud or Abuse to the IG

### Agency Financial Reports

2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017

### Annual Performance Report

FY 2021 | FY 2020

### Annual Performance Report & Annual Performance Plan

FY 2023/FY 2025 | FY 2022/FY 2024 | FY 2019/FY 2021 | FY 2018/FY 2020 | FY 2017/FY 2019 | FY 2016/FY 2018

For older Financial and Performance Plans and Reports, please see the Archive.

GAO High–Risk Improvement PlansThe Department of Justice does not currently have a GAO High Risk Implementation Plan. If we are asked to develop one, we will post it to this page as soon as it is available. In the meantime, please see the main GAO.gov website to see a list of plans from other federal agencies.

## Budget Information

### Budget and Performance Summary

FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017

### Budget Fact Sheets

FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017

### Congressional Budget Submission

FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017

### Exhibit 300s

FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017

*For older budget documents, please see the Justice Management Division Archives.*

## Departmental Strategic Plans

DOJ Strategic Plan, Fiscal Years 2022 - 2026

DOJ Information Technology Strategic Plan, FY 2022-2024

Enterprise-wide Strategic Framework for Equal Employment Opportunity, 2023 - 2026

 

*For older Strategic Plans, please see the Archives.*
#### §§ 313.31-313.39 [Reserved]
#### Carolina Majansky, Appellant, *v.*Hyman Lipman et al., Respondents.

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, borough of Manhattan, rendered *748in favor of the defendants upon a trial had before the court, without a jury.

Jacob Friedman, for appellant.

Simon 0. Pollock, for respondents:

Giegerich, J.

This action is for services performed by the plaintiff as a domestic servant. The defense was that the plaintiff left the defendants’ employ before the expiration of the month for which she was employed, and the justice decided the issues in favor of the defendants. We think that this determination is amply supported by the evidence, and the applicant’s contention that the judgment is against the weight of the evidence cannot be viewed as well founded.

The .justice had the power to permit an amendment of the answer setting up the plea of payment (Milch v. Westchester Fire Ins. Co., 13 Misc. Rep. 231; Thedford v. Reade, 28 id. 563); but, in any event, the amendment did not affect the result, since the issues were determined upon a different ground of defense and payment, which was not in the case except so far as involved in the defendants’ gratuitous payment into court of a sum to which the plaintiff was not actually entitled as matter of law.

Beekman, P. J., and O’Gorman, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****Certification of Principal Financial Officer****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350****(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**I, Barry A. Labinger, Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer (principal financial officer) of Human GenomeSciences, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify, to thebest of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Reporton Form 10-K forthe period ended December 31, 2005 of the Registrant (the“Report”), that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.     /s/ Barry A. Labinger           Name: Barry A. Labinger     Date: March 14, 2006
§ 615.5270 Retirement of other equities. ( a ) Equities other than eligible borrower stock shall be retired at not more than their book value.
( b ) Subject to the redemption restrictions in part 628 of this chapter, no equities shall be retired, except pursuant to §§ 615.5280 and 615.5290 or term stock at its stated maturity, unless after retirement the institution would continue to meet the minimum permanent capital standards established under subpart H of this part, part 628 of this chapter, and the capital requirements established by the board of directors of the System institution.
( c ) A System bank, association, or service corporation board of directors may delegate authority to retire at-risk stock to institution management if: ( 1 ) The board has determined that the institution's capital position is adequate;
( 2 ) All retirements are in accordance with applicable provisions of part 628 of this chapter and the institution's capital adequacy plan or capital restoration plan;
( 3 ) After any retirements, the institution's permanent capital ratio will be in excess of 9 percent, its capital conservation buffer set forth in § 628.11 of this chapter will be above 2.5 percent, and its leverage buffer set forth in § 628.11 of this chapter will be above 1.0 percent;
( 4 ) The institution will continue to satisfy all applicable regulatory capital standards after any retirements; and
( 5 ) Management reports the aggregate amount and net effect of stock purchases and retirements to the board of directors each quarter.
( d ) Each board of directors of a System bank, association, or service corporation that issues preferred stock must adopt a written policy covering the retirement of preferred stock that complies with this paragraph and part 628 of this chapter. The policy must, at a minimum: ( 1 ) Establish any delegations of authority to retire preferred stock and the conditions of delegation, which must meet the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section and include minimum levels for regulatory capital standards as applicable and commensurate with the volatility of the preferred stock.
( 2 ) Identify limitations on the amount of stock that may be retired during a single quarterly (or shorter) time period;
( 3 ) Ensure that all stockholder requests for retirement are treated fairly and equitably;
( 4 ) Prohibit any insider, including institution officers, directors, employees, or agents, from retiring any preferred stock in advance of the release of material non-public information concerning the institution to other stockholders; and
( 5 ) Establish when insiders may retire their preferred stock.
( e ) The institution's board must review its policy at least annually to ensure that it continues to be appropriate for the institution's current financial condition and consistent with its long-term goals established in its capital adequacy plan.
[81 FR 49777, July 28, 2016]
C AND E HOLDINGS Inc
                            2816 East Windrose Drive
                             Phoenix, Arizona 85032


March 15, 2000

Carl P. Ranno Esq.
2816 East Windrose Drive
Phoenix, Arizona 85032

     Re: Lock-Up Agreement with C and E Holdings, Inc.


Gentlemen,

     In  consideration  of the sale to the  holder  by C and E  Holdings,  Inc.,
(Company)  of its  Common  Stock  ($.001  par  value),  the  undersigned  holder
warrants, covenants and agrees for the benefit of the Company not to sell, offer
to sell, solicit an offer to buy, contract to sell, make any short sale, pledge,
grant,  grant any option to purchase,  or otherwise  transfer or dispose of, any
shares of Common stock,  or any  securities  convertible  into or exercisable or
exchangeable for Common Stock, owned directly or beneficially by the undersigned
or with respect to which the undersigned has the power of disposition, except in
connection  with or following a completed  merger or  acquisition by the Company
and the Company is no longer  classified  as a blank check  company  pursuant to
Section 7 (b) (3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

     An attempt to sell, transfer or any type of disposition of the shares shall
be a violation of this letter  agreement and shall be  ineffective  and null and
void.

     In  furtherance  of the  foregoing,  the holder agrees to; (1) delivery his
shares to the  Company  for safe  keeping;  (2) allow the  Company to advise its
Transfer Agent not to transfer said  securities and (3) authorize the company to
deliver a copy of this  Agreement to the  transfer  agent with  instructions  to
decline to make any transfer of securities if such transfer  would  constitute a
violation or breach of this Agreement.

     This  Agreement  shall be  binding  upon the  holder,  its  agents,  heirs,
successors, assignees and beneficiaries.
<PAGE>
     A waiver of the terms and  conditions of this  agreement must be in writing
and executed by the proper officer of the Company and the holder.

     If there is a breach or  threatened  breach of this  Agreement,  the holder
agrees  that  there is no  adequate  remedy at law and said  breach  will  cause
irreparable damage. Accordingly,  the holder agrees that the Company is entitled
to the issuance of an immediate injunction without notice to restrain the breach
or  threatened  breach.  This remedy is not exclusive and the holder agrees that
the  Company  and third  party  beneficiaries  shall be  entitled  to seek other
remedies including a claim for other remedies, including money damages.


THE HOLDER


/s/ Carl P. Ranno
---------------------------
    Carl P. Ranno                   Constituting 1,000,000 shares certificate(s)

                                        2