alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 616.6700 Stock purchase requirements. ( a ) Each System institution, except the Farm Credit Leasing Services Corporation, making an equipment lease under titles II or III of the Act must require the lessee to buy or own at least one share of stock or one participation certificate in the institution making the lease, in accordance with its bylaws.
( b ) The disclosure requirements of § 615.5250(a) and (b) of this chapter apply to stock (or participation certificates) bought as a condition for obtaining a lease.
§ 308.546 Limitations. ( a ) The notice of hearing with respect to a claim or statement will be served in the manner specified in § 308.507 of this subpart within 6 years after the date on which such claim or statement is made.
( b ) If the defendant fails to file a timely answer, service of notice under § 308.509(b) of this subpart will be deemed a notice of a hearing for purposes of this section.
( c ) The statute of limitations may be extended by agreement of the parties.
#### §§ 606.612-606.629 [Reserved]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2013

h1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2013

147430 & (18)(19)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147430

COA: 310378

Ottawa CC: 08

- 032882

- FC

DMITRI ANDERSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3, 2013 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it i s DENIED, because the defendant has failed to

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motions

to remand and to expand the record are DENIED.
#### § 625.26 Recommended decision.

The presiding officer shall file a recommended decision within 30 days after completion of proceedings on the application, and, promptly upon filing, shall serve a copy of the recommended decision upon each party to the proceedings. The decision shall include written findings and conclusions on the applicant's eligibility, status as a prevailing party, the recommended amount of the award, if any, and an explanation of the reasons for any difference between the amount requested and the amount awarded. The decision shall also include, if at issue, findings on whether the FCA's position was substantially justified, whether the applicant unduly protracted the adversary adjudication, or whether special circumstances make an award unjust. If the applicant has sought an award against more than one agency, the decision shall allocate responsibility for payment of any award made among the agencies, and shall explain the reasons for the allocation made.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF MTI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          JURISDICTION OF
        SUBSIDIARY                                         INCORPORATION
        ----------                                        ---------------
<S>                                                           <C>
MTI Technology GmbH                                           Germany
MTI Technology Limited                                        Scotland
MTI France SA                                                  France
Microtechnology Scandinavia, AB                                Sweden
MTI Technology Ireland Ltd.                                    Ireland
MTI Technology BV                                              Holland
MTI Technology SA                                            Switzerland
MTI Technology Europe                                          Ireland
National Peripherals, Inc.                                 Illinois, USA
International Micro Technology, Inc.                    U.S. Virgin Islands
SI Computer Systems, Ltd.                                       UK
System Industries (Deutschland) GmbH                           Germany
SI Network Storage Canada, Ltd.                                Canada
System Industries Ireland, Ltd.                                Ireland
System Industries Network Storage B.V.                         Holland
System Industries (Switzerland), S.A.                        Switzerland
</TABLE>
§ 361.6 What outreach efforts are included in this program? ( a ) Each office engaged in contracting with the private sector will designate one or more MWOP coordinators. The coordinators will perform outreach activities for MWOP and act as liaison between the FDIC and the public on MWOP issues. On a quarterly basis, or as requested by the OMWI, the coordinators will report to the OMWI on their implementation of the outreach program.
( b ) Outreach includes the identification and registration of MWOBs who can provide goods and services utilized by the FDIC. This includes distributing information concerning the MWOP.
( c ) The identification of MWOBs for the provision of legal and non-legal services will primarily be accomplished by: ( 1 ) Obtaining various lists and directories of MWOBs maintained by other federal, state, and local governmental agencies;
( 2 ) Participating in conventions, seminars and professional meetings comprised of, or attended predominately by, MWOBs;
( 3 ) Conducting seminars, meetings, workshops and other various functions to promote the identification and registration of MWOBs;
( 4 ) Placing MWOP promotional advertisements indicating opportunities with the FDIC in minority- and women-owned media; and
( 5 ) Monitoring to assure that FDIC staff interfacing with the contracting community are knowledgeable of, and actively promoting, the MWOP.
[65 FR 31253, May 17, 2000, as amended at 80 FR 62445, Oct. 16, 2015]
#### § 615.5216 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             761,929
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,520,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                       132,930
<INVENTORY>                                      5,475,899
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,253,168
<PP&E>                                          13,091,684
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,658,146
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,579,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,762,015
<BONDS>                                          5,427,564
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               594
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,225,282
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,579,808     
<SALES>                                          4,448,669
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,496,758
<CGS>                                            3,090,779
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,049,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     5,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 243,612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       209,143
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.04
                                               

</TABLE>
42252.

#### STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SEWELL, by Next Friend.

*Bell, P. J., Jordan and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.*

Decided January 24, 1967.

Per Curiam.

The Supreme Court of Georgia having reversed the decision of this court in the above stated case and having determined that a verdict against the insured was demanded, 223 Ga. 31, the prior judgment of this court (114 Ga. App. 331, 151 SE2d 231) is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court.

The judgment of the Supreme Court necessarily overrules the decision of this court in *Georgia Life &c. Ins. Co. v. Sewell,*113 Ga. App. 443 (148 SE2d 447).

*Judgment reversed.*

*85*Heard & Leverett, E. Freeman Leverett,*for appellant.

*Joseph Skelton, McClure, Ramsay & Struble, Robert B. Struble,*for appellee.
# C_2023200EN.01000701.xml

| 8.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/7

---

Resumption of the general review hearing

Reference: 05 KO.2016.672

(2023/C 200/06)

| Bankrupt company: | Gable Insurance AG in Konkurs, Alvierweg 2, 9490 Vaduz |
| --- | --- |
| represented by: Batliner Wanger Batliner Rechtsanwälte AG, Am Schrägen Weg 2, 9490 Vaduz |
| in: | Bankruptcy proceedings |

Bankrupt company:

Gable Insurance AG in Konkurs, Alvierweg 2, 9490 Vaduz

represented by: Batliner Wanger Batliner Rechtsanwälte AG, Am Schrägen Weg 2, 9490 Vaduz

in:

Bankruptcy proceedings

The general review hearing concerning the registered claims will continue on Friday, 26 May 2023, at 9 a.m., in room 4 at this Court.

Princely Court of Justice (Fürstliches Landgericht)

Vaduz, 21 April 2023.

Stefan ROSENBERGER

Judge

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3304 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3304

 To amend the Department of Education Organization Act to establish an 
         Assistant Secretary for Community and Junior Colleges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 15, 2003

  Mr. Upton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Department of Education Organization Act to establish an 
         Assistant Secretary for Community and Junior Colleges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR COMMUNITY AND JUNIOR COLLEGES.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 202(b)(1) of the Department of Education 
Organization Act (20 U.S.C. 3412(b)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (E);
            (2) by redesignating subparagraph (F) as subparagraph (G); 
        and
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the following new 
        subparagraph:
            ``(F) an Assistant Secretary for Community and Junior 
        Colleges; and''.
    (b) Repeal.--Subsection (i) of such section 202 is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit31.2

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Davidson Growth Plus,L.P.;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for theregistrant and have: 

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingand the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordancewith generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3290 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3290

 To amend the Food Stamp Act of 1977 to increase the amount payable to 
 the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to provide nutrition assistance under 
                               such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 15, 2003

 Mr. Acevedo-Vila introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                      the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Food Stamp Act of 1977 to increase the amount payable to 
 the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to provide nutrition assistance under 
                               such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Nutrition for American Citizens 
Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 19(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 
2028(a)(1)(A)(ii)) is amended by inserting ``the sum of 2 percent and'' 
after ``adjusted by''.
                                 <all>
```
#### IDA M. ARNOLD, Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

November 25, 1912.

. 1, PRACTICE, 'TRIAL: Exceptions: Peremptory Instructions. Where the court, at the close of the evidence, gives a peremptory instruction to the jury and no exception is taken thereto, and an involuntary nonsuit taken which the court, on motion, refused to set aside, there is nothing for the appellate court . to review.

2. NONSUIT: Saving Exceptions. The failure to save an exception to the ruling of the court in giving a peremptory instruction precluded the taking of an involuntary nonsuit.

Appeal from Jackson Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *James E*. *Goodrich,*Judge.

Affirmed.

*Ed. E. Aleshire*for appellant.

*Rosenberger & Reed*for respondent.

JOHNSON, J.

This is an action on a policy of accident insurance. The court with the aid of a jury proceeded to try the issues raised by the pleadings and at the conclusion of the evidence gave a peremptory instruction to the jury to return a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff did not except to the giving of this instruction but took “an involuntary nonsuit with leave given to move to set the same aside” and the court discharged the jury. Afterward plaintiff filed a motion to set aside the nonsuit, the court overruled the motion and plaintiff excepted to that ruling and appealed.

There is nothing in the record for us to review. The failure of plaintiff to save an exception to the ruling of the court in giving the peremptory instruc*155tion precluded lier from taking an involuntary non-suit and we must regard the nonsuit as voluntary. As is said by Broaddus, J., in Carter v. O’Neill, 102 Mo. App. 391: “All the authorities in this State are to the effect that a party, in order to have adverse rulings reviewed in an appellate court, must except to such rulings. For his failure below in that respect plaintiff is not entitled to an appeal.” [Lewis v. Mining Co., 199 Mo. 463.]

The exception afterward taken to the ruling on the motion to set aside the nonsuit could not and did not relate back to the ruling on the peremptory instruction and provide an exception to that ruling nor convert into an involuntary nonsuit one that had become irretrievably stamped as voluntary. [Allen v. Railway, 141 Mo. App. 586; Bushyager v. Packing Co., 142 Mo. App. 311.]

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24630]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request; Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Form T-1; OMB Control No. 3235-0110; SEC File No. 270-121.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Form T-1 (17 CFR 269.1) is a statement of eligibility and 
qualification under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (15 U.S.C. 77aaa et 
seq.) of a corporation designated to act as a trustee. The information 
is used to determine whether the trustee is qualified to serve under 
the indenture. Form T-1 is filed on occasion. The information required 
by Form T-1 is mandatory. This information is publicly available on 
EDGAR. Form T-1 takes approximately 15 hours per response to prepare 
and is filed by approximately 13 respondents. We estimate that 25% of 
the 15 hours (4 hours) is prepared by the company for a total annual 
reporting burden of 52 hours (4 hours per response x 13 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    Written comments regarding the above information should be directed 
to the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#36655e57514350425769775e5b535276595b541853594618515940"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33605b5254465547526c725b5e5657735c5e511d565c431d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>; and (ii) Charles Boucher, Director/CIO, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, 
Alexandria, Virginia 22312; or send an e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cccceddc3d1fdf5f0fef3e4dceff9ffb2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f4f4d5e40527e76737d70675f6c7a7c31787069">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: October 7, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-24630 Filed 10-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>