alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                         THE ROBERT MONDAVI CORPORATION
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

                    COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                     1997      1996       1995
                                                   -------    -------    -------
<S>                                                <C>        <C>        <C>
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the year                         15,057     14,613     12,749
Common Stock equivalents considered to be
outstanding for years presented:
  Options                                              613        590         38
  Preferred shares                                      --         --         --
                                                   -------    -------    -------
                                                    15,670     15,203     12,787
                                                   =======    =======    =======
Net Income                                         $28,225    $24,438    $17,820
                                                   =======    =======    =======
Primary earnings per share                         $  1.80    $  1.61    $  1.39
                                                   =======    =======    =======
</TABLE>

                 COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                    1997       1996       1995
                                                   -------    -------    -------
<S>                                                <C>        <C>        <C>
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the year                         15,057     14,613     12,749
Common Stock equivalents considered to be
outstanding for years presented:
  Options                                              715        668        370
  Preferred shares                                      --         --         --
                                                   -------    -------    -------
                                                    15,772     15,281     13,119
                                                   =======    =======    =======
Net Income                                         $28,225    $24,438    $17,820
                                                   =======    =======    =======
Fully Dilutive earnings per share                  $  1.79    $  1.60    $  1.36
                                                   =======    =======    =======
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

EMCARE HOLDINGS INC.

COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      YEAR ENDED
                                                                                      DECEMBER 31,
                                                                              ------------------------
                                                                               1996     1995     1994
                                                                              ------   ------   ------
<S>                                                                           <C>      <C>      <C>
Primary and Fully Diluted:

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during ...............    8,142    7,830    4,965
Weighted average shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options
   using the "treasury stock" method (1) ..................................      389      421      173
                                                                              ------   ------   ------

Weighted average shares outstanding (2) ...................................    8,531    8,251    5,138
                                                                              ======   ======   ======

Income (loss) before extraordinary charge .................................   $5,425   $8,693   $4,569
                                                                              ======   ======   ======
Net income (loss) .........................................................   $5,425   $8,693   $3,372
                                                                              ======   ======   ======

     Income (loss) per share before extraordinary charge ..................   $ 0.64   $ 1.05   $ 0.89
                                                                              ======   ======   ======

     Net income (loss) per share ..........................................   $ 0.64   $ 1.05   $ 0.73
                                                                              ======   ======   ======
</TABLE>

---------------
(1) Exercise of the options is not assumed until the market price of the stock
is above the exercise price for substantially all of three consecutive months.
(2) All shares in these tables are weighted on the basis of the number of days
the shares were outstanding or assumed to be outstanding during each period.
42711.

#### JOHN C. JACKSON, INC. v. HATCH.

Argued April 3, 1967 —

Decided April 7, 1967

Rehearing denied April 21, 1967.

*624*Casper Rich, Robert K. Broome,*for appellant.

*Zachary & Hunter, Ralph T. Bowden, Jr.,*for appellee.

Eberhardt, Judge.

There was no error in overruling the general demurrer. The petition meets the requisites of an action for fraud and deceit. *Snow’s Laundry &c. Co. v. Ga. Power Co.,*61 Ga. App. 402, 405 (6 SE2d 159); *Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co.,*65 Ga. App. 727 (2) (16 SE2d 176); *Norris v. Hart,*74 Ga. *625App. 444 (40 SE2d 96); *Doanes v. Nalley Chevrolet, Inc.,*105 Ga. App. 846 (125 SE2d 717). Though he relies upon concealment of a material fact as the basis for the action, plaintiff alleges that this was done deliberately with an intent to deceive, meeting the test of *Camp Realty Co. v. Jennings,*77 Ga. App. 149 (47 SE2d 917) and of *Code*§ 105-302.

Exemplary damages are recoverable in an action of this kind *(Aderhold v. Zimmer,*86 Ga. App. 204 (1) (71 SE2d 270); *Code*§ 105-2002), as are attorney’s fees *(Dodd v. Slater,*101 Ga. App. 358, 360 (114 SE2d 167)), if the allegations of wilful and deliberate concealment of a material fact upon which plaintiff acted to his detriment and of bad faith on the part of the defendant in accomplishing the deceit as a part of the sale are sustained by evidence upon a trial. *Code*§ 20-1404.

All other enumerations of error, not argued or supported in appellant’s brief, are deemed abandoned.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, :C. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-2883

___________

Frederic G. Bennett, *

 *

Petitioner, *

 *

v. * Petition for Review of an

 * Order of the National

National Transportation Safety Board; * Transportation Safety Board.

Federal Aviation Administration, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Respondents. *

___________

 Submitted: January 27, 2000

 Filed: February 1, 2000

___________

Before McMILLIAN, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit

Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

Frederic G. Bennett petitions for review of an order of the National

Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) upholding the Federal Aviation Administration’s

(FAA) revocation of his Airline Transport Pilot and Flight Instructor certificates. The

NTSB found him in violation of 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.15 (d)(2) (motor vehicle action

occurring within 3 years of previous motor vehicle action is grounds for suspension or

revocation of any certificate) and 61.15(e) (requirement to provide written report of

motor vehicle action to FAA within 60 days of action). 
-2-

The facts pertinent to our analysis are not in dispute, and the NTSB’s factual

findings are adequately supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. See

Reder v. FAA, 116 F.3d 1261, 1263 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review). Mr.

Bennett’s challenge addresses the NTSB’s method of calculating the time between the

motor vehicle actions, and the appropriateness of the sanction. We accord substantial

deference to agency determinations and will affirm the decision unless it is arbitrary,

capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not supported by law. See United

States v. Grand Labs., Inc., 174 F.3d 960, 963 (8th Cir. 1999). After a thorough

review, we conclude the NTSB could properly determine that Mr. Bennett violated

sections 61.15(d) and (e), and that revocation was warranted. See 14 C.F.R.

§§ 61.15(d)(2) (authorizing revocation or suspension), 61.15(f) (1999) (failure to

comply with § 61.15(e) is grounds for revocation or suspension); Balestra v. Busey,

923 F.2d 120, 122-23 (8th Cir. 1991) (NTSB is given wide range of discretion in

imposing sanctions); Garvey v. Kraley, No. EA-4581, 1996 WL 785071, at **1-2

(NTSB Aug. 18, 1997) (administrative suspension of driver’s license for refusal to take

breath test is motor vehicle action; where pilot sustained two motor vehicle actions

within three years, 120-day suspension was at low end of appropriate sanction range);

cf. Stix v. Bond, 569 F.2d 1029, 1031 (8th Cir. 1978) (per curiam) (holding revocation

was not excessive: penalty was imposed for violation committed while petitioner’s

certificate was already suspended, was within specific statutory authorization, and did

not preclude petitioner from applying for new certificate one year after date of

revocation). 

Accordingly, we deny Mr. Bennett’s petition for review.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              This   schedule    contains   summary    financial
                              information  extracted  from  the  Company's  Form
                              10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28, 1997 and
                              is  qualified in its entirety by reference to such
                              financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
                                
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1997 
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1 
<CASH>                                             560,211 
<SECURITIES>                                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                      537,934 
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (19,851)
<INVENTORY>                                              0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,155,167 
<PP&E>                                           1,692,561 
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,124,212)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,908,830 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              924,022 
<BONDS>                                                  0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                          3,882 
<COMMON>                                            41,004 
<OTHER-SE>                                               0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,908,830 
<SALES>                                                  0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,965,818 
<CGS>                                                    0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,856,054 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,150,067 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (22,076)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (43,779)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (43,779)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       (43,779)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.07)
                                               

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3234 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3234

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 14 Chestnut Street in Liberty, New York, as the ``Ben R. Gerow Post 
                           Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3234

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 14 Chestnut Street in Liberty, New York, as the ``Ben R. Gerow Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14 
Chestnut Street in Liberty, New York, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Ben R. Gerow Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ben R. Gerow Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 28, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
II 

Calendar No. 664

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3340

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 7, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JULY 22, 2004

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT

To redesignate the facilities of the United States Postal 

Service located at 7715 and 7748 S. Cottage Grove 

Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘James E. Worsham 

Post Office’’ and the ‘‘James E. Worsham Carrier Annex 

Building’’, respectively, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JAMES E. WORSHAM POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The facility of the United 

5 States Postal Service located at 7715 S. Cottage Grove 

6 Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, shall be known and designated 

7 as the ‘‘James E. Worsham Post Office’’. 
2

•HR 3340 RS 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in this section shall be 

4 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James E. Worsham Post 

5 Office’’. 

6 SEC. 2. JAMES E. WORSHAM CARRIER ANNEX BUILDING. 

7 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The facility of the United 

8 States Postal Service located at 7748 S. Cottage Grove 

9 Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, shall be known and designated 

10 as the ‘‘James E. Worsham Carrier Annex Building’’. 

11 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg12 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

13 States to the facility referred to in this section shall be 

14 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James E. Worsham Car15 rier Annex Building’’. 

Calendar No. 664

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3340

AN ACT

To redesignate the facilities of the United States 

respectively, and for other purposes. ‘‘James E. Worsham Carrier Annex Building’’, ‘‘James E. Worsham Post Office’’ and the tage Grove Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the Postal Service located at 7715 and 7748 S. CotJULY 22, 2004

Reported without amendment
Exhibit 31.2
                          CERTIFICATION

I, James Ivchenko, certify that:

     1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-
QSB of Epolin, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue  statements of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact  necessary  to make the statements made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under  which  such  statements  were   made,   not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,  and
other  financial  information included  in  this  report,  fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of  operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,  and  for,
the periods presented in this report;

      4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls  and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act  Rules  13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

           (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us  by  others  within  those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report  is
being prepared;

           (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report  our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls  and procedures, as of the end of the period covered  by
this report based on such evaluation; and

           (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting  that
occurred  during the small business issuer's most  recent  fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely  to
materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal  control
over financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and  I  have  disclosed, based on our most recent  evaluation  of
internal  control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a)    All   significant  deficiencies  and  material
weaknesses  in the design or operation of internal  control  over
financial  reporting  which are reasonable  likely  to  adversely
affect  the  small business issuer's ability to record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

           (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in  the
small   business   issuer's  internal  control   over   financial
reporting.


Dated: October 15, 2004           By:/s/ James Ivchenko
                                   James Ivchenko,
                                   President (Principal Financial
                                   Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  (A)
CONDENSED   CONSOLIDATED   BALANCE  SHEET  AT  SEPTEMBER  30,  2000,   CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED  INCOME  STATEMENT FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. Dollars

<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     Sep-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                             1,911,212
<SECURITIES>                          29,750
<RECEIVABLES>                      3,785,553
<ALLOWANCES>                         383,157
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   9,093,086
<PP&E>                             8,036,987
<DEPRECIATION>                     3,312,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    21,752,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              4,582,435
<BONDS>                            3,763,350
<COMMON>                              45,109
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                        11,783,849
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      21,752,743
<SALES>                           15,324,128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  15,324,128
<CGS>                                883,066
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     10,849,671
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   6,715,063
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    48,028
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    3,834,680
<INCOME-TAX>                       1,791,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                2,043,680
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                       2,043,680
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.61


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-02297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


U.S. Strategic Command Strategic Advisory Group; Meeting

AGENCY:  Department of Defense, USSTRATCOM.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Strategic Advisory Group (SAG) will meet in closed 
session on April 13 and 14, 2000. The mission of the SAG is to provide 
timely advice on scientific, technical, and policy-related issues to 
the Commander in Chief, U.S. Strategic Command, during the development 
of the nation's strategic war plans. At this meeting, the SAG will 
discuss strategic issues that relate to the development of the Single 
Integrated Operational Plan (SIOP). Full development of the topics will 
require discussion of information classified TOP SECRET in accordance 
with Executive Order 12958, April 17, 1995. Access to this information 
must be strictly limited to personnel having requisite security 
clearances and specific need-to know. Unauthorized disclosure of the 
information to be discussed at the SAG meeting could have exceptionally 
grave impact upon national defense.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, (5 U.S.C. App 2), it has been determined that this SAG meeting 
concerns matters listed in 5 USC 552b(c) and that, accordingly, this 
meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: January 28, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-02297 Filed 2-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-01-M