alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Steven G. Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big 5 Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financing reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 29, 2004                                         /s/ Steven G. Miller   Steven G. Miller   President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>


                     [LETTERHEAD OF THE CREDIT STORE(R), INC.]



May 31, 2001

VIA FACSIMILE & U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL
-----------------------------------
(605) 948-2198


Steve Hageman, President
Bank of Hoven
202 Main Street
Hoven, South Dakota 57450

        RE:    Repurchase Agreement Dated November 30, 2000 and Letter Agreement
               Dated February 27, 2001

Dear Mr. Hageman:

This letter shall memorialize the agreement between Bank of Hoven and The Credit
Store, Inc. to modify the provisions of Section 2.2(a) of the Repurchase
Agreement dated November 30, 2000, and as amended by the Letter Agreement dated
February 27, 2001, to extend the Option Period from May 31, 2001, to August 31,
2001. In consideration of this modification, The Credit Store, Inc. will pay
$10,000 to Bank of Hoven. Please sign this letter to signify your agreement
with the above modification.

                            Sincerely Yours,


                            /s/ Michael J. Philippe
                            -----------------------
                            Michael J. Philippe
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



APPROVED AND ACCEPTED:

BANK OF HOVEN


/s/ Steve Hageman
------------------------
Steve Hageman, President
283-LTS Doc#:19852-2 Filed:01/20/22 Entered:01/21/22 10:27:43 Desc:

Envelope Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

      ( print page 52981)    
In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting.

*Name:*                         Rutgers University Site Visit (1208).                    

*Date and Time:*                         Tuesday, October 27, 2009; 8 a.m.-5 p.m. Wednesday, October 28, 2009; 8 a.m.-1 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Partially Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. James Reidy, Program Director for Elementary Particle Physics, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7392.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide an evaluation concerning the proposal submitted to the National Science Foundation.                    

*Agenda:*

## Tuesday, October, 27, 2009

Open: 0800-0930—Orientation, Introduction of Panel, Welcome; 0930-1145—Tevatron presentations.

Closed: 1145-0100—Meeting with the Department Chair, Dean, and Students; 0100-0130—Executive Session.

Open: 0130-0230—CMS—M&O/PLT presentations; 0245-0300—Computing and Networks; 0315-0415—CMS and Facilities Tour.

Closed: 0415-0600—Executive Session.

## Wednesday, October 27, 2009

Open: 0745-1015—CMS Physics Presentations.

Closed: 1015-0100—Executive Session.

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposal contains proprietary or confidential material, including technical information on personnel. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2)(4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: October 9, 2009.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-24817 Filed 10-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
DATE:

TO: Desk Officer

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs

Office of Management and Budget

THROUGH: Kate Mullan

Information Collections Clearance Division

Privacy Information and Records Management Services

FROM: Leonard L. Haynes, III, Ph.D.

Senior Director 

Institutional Service

SUBJECT: Request for Approval of the Predominantly Black Institutions Program 

Application (CFDA 84.031P)

Attached for your review and approval is the application package for the Predominantly

Black Institutions Program. We are requesting a three-year approval. The application will 

be used for the Fiscal Year 2013 Phase I Data Collection, which will be collected in Spring 

2013. 

The attached ICR Part I, ICR Part II, Supporting Statement, and the Application for the 

Predominantly Black Institutions program are being submitted as required for approval of a 

data collection instrument. 

Attachments:

ICR Part I

ICR Part II

Supporting Statement

Application for Predominantly Black Institutions
#### § 302.3 Rule of construction.

This subpart does not alter the legal status of guidelines authorized by statute, including but not limited to, 12 U.S.C. 1831p-1, to create binding legal obligations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-05-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-07-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-05-1997
<CASH>                                           4,337
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,283
<INVENTORY>                                     14,637
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,695
<PP&E>                                          35,216
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,962
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,592
<SALES>                                        120,359
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,727
<CGS>                                           83,607
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   319
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,993
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,368
<INCOME-TAX>                                       664
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,704
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,704
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
#### § 619.9015 Agricultural credit associations.

Agricultural credit associations are associations created by the merger of one or more Federal land bank associations or Federal land credit associations and one or more production credit associations and which have received a transfer of authority to make and participate in long-term real estate mortgage loans pursuant to section 7.6 of the Act.

[55 FR 24888, June 19, 1990]
#### ROGER B. WOOD, TRUSTEE, v. UNITED STATES

[61 C. Cls. 192; 270 U. S. 650]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Co'urt March 15, 1926.
#### Refugio RODRIGUEZ et al, *v.*Richard B. ADKISSON, Judge

5817

491 S.W. 2d 814

Opinion delivered March 26, 1973

*Henry J. Osterloh*for petitioners.

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Átty. Gen., by: *Frank B. Newell,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The two petitioners, Refugio Rodriguez and Ramon Cantu, were charged with the unlawful possession of marijuana, with the intent to deliver it, in violation of Act 590 of 1971 as amended by Acts 67 and 68 of 1972. Ark. Stat. Ann., Title 82, Ch. 26 (Supp. 1971), as amended. Having pleaded not guilty in the trial court, the petitioners now seek a writ of prohibition to prevent the case from being tried and to obtain a dismissal of the charges. The petitioners’ theory is that Act 68 of 1972 is unconstitutional and that the invalidity of the act may be put on issue by their petition for a writ of prohibition.

We find no merit in the contention that prohibition is the appropriate remedy. Basically, the petitioners are charged with a violation of Act 590 of 1971, the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, which provides a criminal penalty for the possession of marijuana with the intent to deliver it. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 82-2617. Act 590 was amended by Act 67 of 1972, which, among other things, raised certain of the offenses from misdemeanors to fe*129lonies. Act 590 was also amended by Act 68 of 1972, which provides, in part, that the possession of more than one ounce-of marijuana creates a rebuttable presumption of an intent to deliver it to someone else.

Prohibition involves jurisdictional issues. For the writ to issue, it must appear that the trial court is about to act in a matter beyond its jurisdiction and that the petitioner has no other remedy to prevent the threatened usurpation of power. *Harkey*v. *Matthews,*243 Ark. 775, 422 S.W. 2d 410 (1967). Here the petitioners contend that Act 68 involves a denial of due process, in that the mere possession of more than one ounce of marijuana does not reasonably and necessarily give rise to the conclusion that the possessor intends to deliver it. Even so, the trial court’s jurisdiction obviously does not depend upon the validity of Act 68. The State may decide not to invoke the presumption. Act 68, even if invalid, may be found to be separable from the more comprehensive uniform act. Actually, the petitioners are contending that the mere passage of Act 68 had such a far-reaching effect upon Act 590 that it is no longer illegal to possess more than an ounce of marijuana. To state that contention is to answer it.

Writ denied.
§ 23.1 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* A national bank may engage in personal property lease financing transactions pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 24(Seventh) or 12 U.S.C. 24(Tenth).
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part is to set forth standards for personal property lease financing transactions authorized for national banks.
( c ) *Scope.* This part applies to the acquisition of personal property by a national bank for the purpose of, or in connection with, the leasing of that property.
U.S. Department ofTransportation, Dockets Attn: Dockets OST 98-3304 400 Seventh St. S.W. PL401 Washington DC, 20590 USA 1February 2013

Dear Sir, Kenyon House I The Western Centre Western Road Bracknell •RGI21RW



# -

This letter is to inform youthat from Friday 5thFebruary 2013, Kenyon will no longer provide third party recovery support to Pro Airways inthe event ofmass fatality incident underthe U.S. Aviation Disaster Family Assistance Act of 1996. Ifyou have any questions relating to this letter, please contact me at the above address. Yours faithfully

Jeremy Allen Vice President Cc. AndrewFoulsham- Pro Airways

Kenyon UK a branch ofKenyon International Emergency Services Inc., 15180 Grand Point Drive, Houston, Texas 77090. Company Reg. No. FC24150. VAT Reg. No. 793 0410 38
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             FRONTIER ENERGY CORP.
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350



      The undersigned, Robert Genesi, in his capacities as President and Acting
Chief Financial Officer of Frontier Energy  Corp.  does hereby certify that the
Form 10-Q/A of Frontier Energy Corp. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully
complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of  the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m  or  78o(d))  and  that  the information
contained  in  such  Form  10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of Frontier Energy Corp.

      This certification is  given by the undersigned solely for the purpose of
18 U.S.C. 1350 and is subject to the knowledge standard contained therein.


      Executed this 19th day of August, 2008.


                                /s/ Robert Genesi
				-----------------
                                Robert Genesi
                                President and Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                Principal Financial Officer
**C M** **F** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0166 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KYLE ALEXANDER HAMM ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including January 3 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court December 3 2021

12/03/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0166
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from
          the condensed  consolidated balance sheet of Synthetic Industries L.P.
          as of  September  30,  1996  and the  related  condensed  consolidated
          statement  of  income  and cash  flows  for the  twelve  months  ended
          September  30, 1996 and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
          such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000901175
<NAME>                        Synthetic Industries LP Annual Report
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                          103
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   50897
<ALLOWANCES>                    3036
<INVENTORY>                     39142
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                101761
<PP&E>                          213142
<DEPRECIATION>                  75168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  323756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           38373
<BONDS>                         204145
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                      65185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    323756
<SALES>                         299532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                299532
<CGS>                           208321
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   50806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2952
<LOSS-PROVISION>                3036
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              22773
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 14341
<INCOME-TAX>                    6900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             7441
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    7441
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   9.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                   9.21
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit23.1**

 

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-70050,33-80985, 333-32237 and 333-57754 of Aldila, Inc. on Form S-8 and RegistrationStatement Nos. 33-81792 and 333-117883 on Form S-3 of our report dated February13, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Aldila, Inc. forthe year ended December 31, 2003.

 

 

PETERSON& CO., LLP

 

SanDiego, California

March22, 2005

 

----
#### State of Indiana *v.*Sittason.

[No. 22,261 to 22,268 and 22,271.

Filed May 29, 1913.]

From Floyd Circuit Court; *Harry C. Montgomery,*Special Judge.

Prosecutions by the State of Indiana against Claude M. Sittason. From a judgment in each case quashing the indictment, these appeals are prosecuted.

*Reversed.*

*Thomas M. Honan,*Attorney-General, *Thomas H. Branaman, Edwin Corr*and *James E. McCullough,*for the State.

*Stotsenberg & Weathers*and *Charles D. Kelso,*for appellee.

Erwin, J.

The State of Indiana prosecutes the appellee in the above numbered causes from the Floyd Circuit Court. From a judgment quashing the indictment in said causes the State appeals to this court.

The questions involved are the same in each case as those presented in the case of *State*v. *Paris*(1913), *ante*446, 101 N. E. 497, and upon that authority the judgment is reversed in each case with order to the court below to overrule the appellee’s motion to quash the indictment
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 9,
2000, with respect to the financial statements of Human Genome Sciences, Inc.
included in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, in the
following Registration Statements:

     (1) Registration Statement Number 33-79020 on Form S-8

     (2) Registration Statement Number 33-79022 on Form S-8

     (3) Registration Statement Number 333-85319 on Form S-3

     (4) Registration Statement Number 333-96387 on Form S-3



                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


McLean, Virginia
March 14, 2000
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

         Undertaking to Furnish Copies of Omitted Exhibits and Schedules to
$250,000,000 Note Purchase Agreement dated as of August 12, 1998.

         United Asset Management Corporation (the "Registrant") is not filing as
exhibits to its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated November 12, 1998, copies of
the exhibits and schedules to the $250,000,000 Note Purchase Agreement dated as
of August 12, 1998, which Agreement is filed as Exhibit 10.2 thereto.

         The Registrant undertakes to furnish to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, upon request, copies of such omitted exhibits and schedules.




Dated: November 12, 1998

UNITED ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
                        (Registrant)


By: /s/ William H. Park
    -------------------------------
    William H. Park
    Executive Vice President
      and Chief Financial Officer