alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Stone *v.*The State.

*Adultery.*

(Decided January 13, 1914.

64 South. 158.)

*Adultery; Verdict; Related Charges.*— The jury is not required to find by their verdict which one of the related charges a defendant is guilty of under an indictment charging adultery or fornication.

Appeal from Autauga Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

Andrew Stone was convicted of living in adultery, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

Riddle & Ellis, for appellant. No brief came to the Reporter.

Robert C. Brickell, Attorney General, for the State.

PELHAM, J. —

The indictment charges living in adultery or fornication, in the form prescribed by the Code (Cr. Code, p. 672, form 69), and the jury were not required, in finding the defendant guilty, to specify •which of the alternative related charges contained in *67tbe indictment, i. e., adultery or fornication, they found to be *true.*— White *v. State, 74*Ala. 31.

The record contains no error, and the judgment of conviction, appealed from on the record without a bill of exceptions, is affirmed.

Affirmed.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3336

To clarify congressional approval of certain State energy production tax 

practices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 17, 2003

Mr. GILLMOR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To clarify congressional approval of certain State energy 

production tax practices.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ENERGY PRODUCTION INCENTIVES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—A State may provide to any enti5 ty—

6 (1) a credit against any tax or fee owed to the 

7 State under a State law, or 

8 (2) any other tax incentive, 
2

•HR 3336 IH 

1 determined by the State to be appropriate, in the amount 

2 calculated under and in accordance with a formula deter3 mined by the State, for production described in subsection 

4 (b) in the State by the entity that receives such credit or 

5 such incentive. 

6 (b) ELIGIBLE ENTITIES.—Subsection (a) shall apply 

7 with respect to the production in the State of—

8 (1) electricity from coal mined in the State and 

9 used in a facility, if such production meets all appli10 cable Federal and State laws and if such facility 

11 uses scrubbers or other forms of clean coal tech12 nology, 

13 (2) electricity from a renewable source such as 

14 wind, solar, or biomass, or 

15 (3) ethanol. 

16 SEC. 2. EFFECT ON INTERSTATE COMMERCE. 

17 Any action taken by a State in accordance with this 

18 Act with respect to a tax or fee payable, or incentive appli19 cable, for any period beginning after the date of the enact20 ment of this Act shall—

21 (1) be considered to be a reasonable regulation 

22 of commerce, and 

23 (2) not be considered to impose an undue bur24 den on interstate commerce or to otherwise impair, 
3

•HR 3336 IH 

1 restrain, or discriminate, against interstate com2 merce.

Æ
Test Data for Alcoa

- Intalco, Ferndale, WA

(5 files)
NUMBER    Incorporated under the laws of the State of Colorado       SHARES


                     CHINA NET & TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


                       Total Authorized Issue
                  20,000,000 Shares Without Par Value
                          Common Stock




This is to certify that ___________________________________ is the owner of

                                                               Fully paid and
non-assessable shares of the above corporation transferable only on the books
of the Corporation by the holder thereof in person or by a duly authorized
Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized
officers.

Dated



      Secretary                                           President
F i s h 

C r e e k 

T i n g m

i a

k s i q v i k R i v e r 

K i

k i a k r o r a k 

R i v e r 

Ko g o s u k r u k 

R i v e r 

Ju d y

Cr e e k 

Migu akiak R. 

C o l v i l l e 

Ikpikp

uk 

River 

R

i

v

e

r 

Nuiqsut 

Umiat 

Atigaru Point 

Cape Halkett 

H a r r i s o n 

B a y 

B e a u f o r t 

S e a 

1 E 2 

9 

2 

8 

4 

6 

9 N 

A R C T I C O C E A N

Cape Simpson 

Pitt Point 

Sm ith Bay 

15 N

4 3 2 1 W 12 11 10 8 7 6 5

Kogru R. 14

13

12

T e s h e k p u k L a k e 

10

2 3 4 5

1 W 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

5

3

2

1 N 

2 3 4 5

1 W 1 E 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

1 S 

2

3

BELUGA WHALE 

4

Beluga Whale Sighting 

5

0 6 12

Miles 

Source: USDOI MMS and Naval Ocean Systems Center 2002 6

Map 3-30. Beluga Whale Sightings Offshore of the Northeast National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska

(1987 - 1999) 

11 

7
#### § 606.640 Employment.

No qualified individual with handicaps shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in the agency.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 1, 2018

No. 04-17-00486-CV

RIVER CITY ROOFING & REMODELING, INC.,

Appellants

v.

Howard SOLOMON,

Appellee

From the County Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CV-0135

Honorable Robin V. Dwyer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s second motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due 

February 26, 2018. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of February, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
OLSON  FARMS,  INC.
-------------------

March  16,  2000                              Via  Facsimile  and  U.S.  Mail
                                              -------------------------------

Dave  Foran
Chief  Financial  Officer
Industrial  Rubber  Innovations,  Inc.
6801  McDivitt
Bakersfield,  CA


Dear  Dave,

We  have  arrived  at  terms  with  Pillsbury  Company  about the leasing of the
building  to them. We are in the process of formalizing what has been agreed to.

This will serve as notice to you that you will need to vacate the building as of
April  1st  as  that  is  the date they wish to take possession of the building,
which  I  have  agreed  to.

As  we  had  previously  agreed,  if  we  were successful in working a deal with
Pillsbury,  Industrial  Rubber  Innovations  (IRI)  would issue 25,000 shares of
publicly traded, unrestricted stock to us. The name that the certificates should
be  issued  in  is  Summers  Ranch,  Inc.

I  will let you know as soon as the lease is signed, which should be in a matter
of  days,  so  that  you  can  make  delivery  of  the  stock  certificates.

Should  you  have  questions,  please  feel  free  to  call  me.


Best  regards,


/s/  Rick  Trout
Rick  Trout
Chief  Financial  Officer


cc:  Michael  L.  Mills,  President
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3349

AN ACT

To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and

judges of the United States for fiscal year 2004.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3349

AN ACT

To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of

the United States for fiscal year 2004.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3349 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SALARY ADJUSTMENTS

2 FOR FEDERAL JUSTICES AND JUDGES.

3 Pursuant to section 140 of Public Law 97–92, Jus4 tices and judges of the United States are authorized dur5 ing fiscal year 2004 to receive a salary adjustment in ac6 cordance with section 461 of title 28, United States Code.

Passed the House of Representatives November 5,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1147 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 196)IV-E-7 0 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/22/20082:42:57

PM Sheet 196 of 242P.2

'• A\ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 

## #-87-/ /

OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATION " 

### SE P 

### 2 2 198

8 MEMORANDU M SUBJECT : FROM : 

### TO : Phon e Conversatio nWit hMr . Georg e Musse r o f Exxo n

Joh nF . Anderson , Senio r Projec t Manage r Standard s Developmen t andSuppor t Branc h Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1 

# Q^/Z^jy

Durin g th e wee k o f Septembe r 12 , 198 8 I ha dconversation s wit hMr . Georg e Musse r o f EXXO Nconcernin g arrangement s fo r th e testin g o f th e AP I onboar dcars . Th e purpos e o f thes e conversation s wa s t o obtai nvariou s detail s abou t th e constructio nandoperatio no f th e modifie dFor dvehicl e t o facilitat e ou r testin g o f th e vehicle .

? I
#### §§ 324.163-324.170 [Reserved]
**Memorandum**

To: File From: Anita Lee, EPA Region IX Date: February

23, 2012 Subject: Telephone Conversation with Sterling Gray, URS regarding PerNOxide Controls This memorandum summarizes main points during conversation with Sterling Gray of URS Corporation.
 Navajo Generating Station uses a forced oxidation gy psum producing wet scrubber. The chemistry of the existing scrubbers is not favorable for capture of the oxidized NOx species formed from reaction with peroxide. However, the scrubber chemistry can be changed and converted to inhibited oxidation , ultimately could involve use of sodium, but Mr. Gray believes the plant may not be receptive to changing the scru bber chemistry .  Before this technology would be considered at NGS, Mr. Gray believes a pilot or full scale demonstration would be required first.  URS’s estimate that the combination of SNCR and PerNOxide could reduce NOx emissions by

63% is generall y an av erage of an expected range of 60

– 65%.  URS’s estimate that capital costs of $40/kW (SNCR + PerNOxide) for a 400 MW unit could be conservativel y applied to a larger unit, i.e., cost per kW for larger units would probably be lower, but use of the $40/kW would be conservative. For NGS, this cost does not include the potential costs to modify the scrubber chemistry .  Similar to annual maintenance costs for SNCR or PerNOxide alone, the annual maintenance cost for SNCR + PerNOxide is expected to be 1% of capital costs.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 29]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ029.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 219]]

Public Law 110-29
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
60 Calle McKinley, West in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, as the ``Miguel Angel 
  Garcia Mendez Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: June 1, 2007 -  [H.R. 
                                 414]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MIGUEL ANGEL GARCIA MENDEZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 60 Calle McKinley, West in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Miguel Angel Garcia Mendez Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Miguel 
Angel Garcia Mendez Post Office Building''.

    Approved June 1, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 414:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Feb. 12, considered and passed House.
            May 23, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND> 
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
audited  consolidated  financial  statements  at  December  31, 1997 and for the
twelve month period ended  December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000900619
<NAME>                        ECCS, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         11,625
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,034
<ALLOWANCES>                                   297
<INVENTORY>                                    4,596
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               22,464
<PP&E>                                         5,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,688
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 24,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,204
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       109
<OTHER-SE>                                     17,534
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   24,992
<SALES>                                        34,001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               34,001
<CGS>                                          24,226
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,687
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             28
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,222
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,222
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                120
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,102
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .11
        

</TABLE>
AMERICAN SAMOA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

TOGIOLA TA. TULAFONO 1) f D DDA TOAFA F.T. VAIAGAE PELD.

Governor .j. jjOX PS. Director

Pago Pago, American Samoa 96799 FAOA A. SUNJA Phone: (684) 633-2304 Li. Governor Admin. Fax: (684) 633-5715

12 June 2012 Programs Fax: (684) 633-5801

David Smith, Manager

NPDES Permits Office

USEPA Region 9

75 Hawthorne St.

San Francisco, CA 94105 - 3901

Re: Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) request for

CWA section 401 Certification.

Dear Mr. Smith:

On behalf of the people of American Samoa, I sincerely wish to thank you for giving us the

opportunity to comment on the reissuance of NPDES Vessel General Permit (VGP) and NPDES

Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP).

We have received and reviewed your request for a CWA section 401 Certification for NPDES

permits for discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial and non-recreational

vessels both greater (VGP) and less (sVGP) than 79 feet in length.

The proposed discharges outlined in the draft general permits are found to be consistent with the

uses for the waters of American Samoa as stated in the American Samoa Water Quality

Standards (ASWQS) and sections 301, 302, 303, 306, and 307 ofthe Clean Water Act. AS-EPA

has determined that there is reasonable assurance that the discharge will not cause violations of

the ASWQS. Certification is hereby given for this activity provided that all conditions of the

NPDES permit and the ASWQS continue to be met.

Should you have any questions about our Territory, please do not hesitate to contact me or

Faamao Asalele, Assistant Director — Technical Programs at 684-633-2304.

Sincerely,

Fanuatele

Cc: John McCarroll, Manager, EPA Region 9, Pacific Islands Office

Michael Wolfram, Program Manager, EPA Region 9, Pacific Islands Office

Faainao Asalele, Assistant Director — Technical Programs

Vaasa Simanu, Assistant Director — Administration Division

e, Director
U.s. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

Rebecca J. Cronkhite 

Statewide Aviation Planner 

October 29.2010 

Department of Transportation and Public Facilities 

4111 Aviation Avenue 

P.O. Box 196900 

Anchorage, AK 99519 

Dear Ms. Cronkhite, 

1 :'00 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington. DC 20590 

I would like to update you on the essential air service (EAS) situation at Gulkana, May 

Creek, and McCarthy, and give you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record 

before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and 

International Affairs. As you may know. Ellis Air Taxi, Inc. d/b/a Copper Valley Air 

Service (Ellis Air), is the current EAS provider at those communities, receiving a 

combined subsidy of $424,652, and their contract expires January 31, 2011. In 

anticipation of that, we issued Order 2010-9-27, September 27,2010, soliciting proposals 

from carriers interested in providing subsidized EAS for a new. two-year period, 

beginning February 1. 2011. In response to our request, only the incumbent. Ellis Air, 

submitted a proposal to maintain status-quo service at all three communities. 

In case you have not received a copy of the proposal from Ellis Air, it can be accessed at 

\\ww.regulations.gov by entering the numbers OST-1995-492. I will brietly summarize 

their proposal here. 

Ellis Air has proposed one service option at Gulkana using six-seat twin engine Piper PA31 aircraft operating two rollnd trips each week year-round to Anchorage for an annual 

subsidy of $262,220. At May Creek and McCarthy, Ellis Air proposes to provide two 

nonstop or one-stop round trips per week to Gulkana using three-seat Cessna 185 aircraft 

during winter months and four-seat Cessna 206 aircraft during summer months for an 

annual subsidy of $176,692. 

The schedules that the carrier has proposed are illustrative only and they may make 

schedule changes to reflect changing conditions, e.g., to better meet shifting connecting 

hank times at the hub. However, the Department does expect a subsidized air carrier to 

maintain well-timed and well-spaced flights in order to ensure full compensation. 

We request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as 

soon as possible, but no later than November 16. We will carefully consider your 

comments before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for a decision. 
- 2 -

Please send your comments via e-mail to EAS@dot.gov or by fax to 202-366-7638. If 

you have any questions, please feel free to contact Michael Martin of my staff at 

michael.f.martin@dot.gov or 202-366-6494. 

Sincerely, 

cc: Gulkana Village Council 

McCarthy Area Council 

Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis
U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Dockets 

Attn: Dockets OST 98-3304 

400 Seventh St. S.W. 

PL401 

Washington DC, 20590 

USA 

1 February 2013 

Dear Sir, 

Kenyon House 

I The Western Centre 

Western Road 

Bracknell 

•RGI21RW 

-

This letter is to inform you that from Friday 5th February 2013, Kenyon will no longer 

provide third party recovery support to Pro Airways in the event of mass fatality 

incident under the U.S. Aviation Disaster Family Assistance Act of 1996. 

If you have any questions relating to this letter, please contact me at the above 

address. 

Yours faithfully 

Jeremy Allen 

Vice President 

Cc. Andrew Foulsham- Pro Airways 

Kenyon UK a branch of Kenyon International Emergency Services Inc., 

15180 Grand Point Drive, Houston, Texas 77090. Company Reg. No. FC24150. VAT Reg. No. 793 0410 38
§ 612.2302 Notification of board of directors and bonding company. ( a ) The institution's board of directors shall be promptly notified of any criminal referral by the institution, except that if the criminal referral involves a member of the board of directors, discretion may be exercised in notifying such member of the referral.
( b ) The institution involved shall promptly make all required notifications under any applicable surety bond or other contract for protection.
§ 367.5 Exclusions. ( a ) The Ethics Counselor may exclude a contractor from the FDIC contracting program for any of the causes set forth in § 367.6, using procedures established in this part.
( b ) Exclusion is a serious action to be imposed when there exists a preponderance of the evidence that a contractor has violated one or more of the causes set forth in § 367.6. Contractors excluded from FDIC contracting programs are prohibited from entering into any new contracts with FDIC for the duration of the period of exclusion as determined pursuant to this part. The FDIC shall not solicit offers from, award contracts to, extend or modify existing contracts, award task orders under existing contracts, or consent to subcontracts with such contractors. Excluded contractors are also prohibited from conducting business with FDIC as agents or representatives of other contractors. *Provided however,* that these limitations do not become effective upon the notification of the contractor that there is a possible cause to exclude under § 367.13. Rather, they become effective only upon the Ethics Counselor's decision to exclude the contractor pursuant to § 367.16. *Provided further,* that the causes for exclusion set forth in § 367.6(a)(1) through (4) reflect statutorily established mandatory bars to contracting with the FDIC.
( c ) Except when one or more of the statutorily established mandatory bars to contracting are shown to exist, the existence of a cause for exclusion does not necessarily require that the contractor be excluded; the seriousness of the contractor's acts or omissions and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances shall be considered in making any exclusion decision.