U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 10-Q





(Mark One)


xQUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010





 ̈TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT





For the transition period from ___________ to ___________





Commission file number: 000-29087





Datascension, Inc.




(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Nevada

87-0374623(State or other jurisdiction of

(IRS Employerincorporation or organization)

Identification No.)





532 Pima Canyon Court, Las Vegas, NV

89144(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)





702-233-6785




(Issuer's telephone number)







(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,


if changed since last report)





Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.





Yes xNo  ̈





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.





Large accelerated filer  ̈

Accelerated filer  ̈Non-accelerated filer  ̈
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company x





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, everyInteractive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).YesxNooNot applicable.








Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).


Yes  ̈No x








APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY


PROCEEDING DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS





Check whether the Registrant filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.


Yes xNo  ̈





APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS





The Registrant has 21,407,361 shares outstanding, par value $.001 per share as of May 15, 2009.













TABLE OF CONTENTS





Page

No.PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATIONItem 1.
Financial StatementsBalance Sheet (unaudited)Statements of Operations (unaudited)Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)Notes to Financial StatementsItem 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Plan of OperationItem 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskItem 4T.
Controls and ProceduresPART II.
OTHER INFORMATIONItem 1.
Legal ProceedingsItem 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity and Use of ProceedsItem 3.
Defaults upon Senior SecuritiesItem 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security HoldersItem 5.
Other InformationItem 6.
ExhibitsSignatures








PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION





Item 1. Financial Statements.





The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Datascension, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("DSEN"), included herein have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to quarterly reports on Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote data necessary for fair presentation of financial position and results of operations in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. It is therefore suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the summary of significant accounting policies and notes to financial statements included in DSEN's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.





In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary in order to make the financial position, results of operations and changes in financial position at March 31, 2010, and for all periods presented not misleading have been made. The results of operations for the period ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily an indication of operating results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2010.








1


DATASCENSION, INC.


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET





03/31/2010


12/31/2009UNAUDITED


AUDITEDASSETSCurrent assets:Cash

$
215,666


$
-Accounts receivable


747,217



919,717Prepaid expenses


26,068



15,587Total current assets


988,951



935,304Property and equipment, net of depreciation


1,205,757



1,303,566Other assets:Deposits


92,807



113,382Total other assets


92,807



113,382Total assets

$
2,287,515


$
2,352,252LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYCurrent liabilitiesCash overdraft

$
-


$
54,790Accounts payable


152,627



266,320Accrued expenses


1,533,466



1130,778Short term notes payable


500.000



500,000Current portion of long term debt


4,245,130



-Total current liabilities


6,431,223



1,951,888Long term debt notes payable, net of current portion


377,592



4,726,941Total liabilities


6,808,815



6,678,829Stockholders' (deficit) equityCommon stock, $0.001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized 21,307,361 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 respectively


21,407



21,407Additional paid in capital, common stock


16,825,908



16,825,908Preferred stock, Series C


1



1Additional paid in capital, preferred Series C


14,999



14,999Treasury stock (15,095,833 shares), at cost


(134,388)
)


(134,388)Accumulated deficit


(21,249,227
)


(21,054,504)Total stockholders' (deficit) equity


(4,521.300)
)


(4,326,577)Total liabilities and stockholders' (deficit) equity

$
2,287,515


$
2,352,252


The accompanying notes to the financial statements should be read in conjunction with the above financial statements











2





DATASCENSION, INC.


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


(UNAUDITED)





For the


For theThree months


Three monthsEnded


Ended3/31/2010


3/31/2009Revenues

$
2,702,191


$
3,773,187Cost of  goods sold


2,417,430



3,106,504Gross profit


284,761



666,683Expenses:Selling, general and administrative


374,179



437,328Depreciation and amortization


97,809



91,617Total expenses


471,988



528,945Operating Income


(187,227)



137,738Other income(expense):Other income


15,103



17,118Debt forgiveness


135,000



-Interest expense


(157,599
)


(145,945)Total other income (expense)


(7,496
)


(128,827)Net income (loss) before income taxes


(194,723)



8,911Income taxes


-



-Net income (loss)

$
(194,723)


$
8,911Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding


21,407,361



21,307,361Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding


21,407,361



21,307,361Basic net profit (loss) per share

$
(0.01)


$
(0.00)Diluted net loss per share

$
(0.01)


$
(0.00)


The accompanying notes to the financial statements should be read in conjunction with the above financial statements.











3








DATASCENSION, INC.


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


(UNAUDITED)





Unaudited


UnauditedFor the


For theThree months ended


Three months ended3/31/2010


3/31/2009Cash flows from operating activitiesNet profit (loss)

$
(194,723)


$
8,911Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided (used)by operating activities:Depreciation and amortization


97,809



91,617Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Decrease  in accounts receivable


172,500



69,511Increase in prepaid expenses


(10,481)



(17,858)Increase (decrease) in deposits


20,575



(5,273)Decrease in cash overdraft


(54,790)Decrease  in accounts payable


(113,693)



(211,344)Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses


402,688



408,385Net cash used by operating activities


319,885



343,949Cash flows from investing activitiesPurchases of property and equipment


-



(50,102)Net cash used by investing activities


-



(50,102)Cash flows from financing activitiesDecrease in notes payable


-



(7,026)(Decrease) increase in convertible debt/notes payable


(104,219)



(35,784)Net cash used  by financing activities


(104,219)



(42,810)Net increase (decrease) in cash


215,666



251,037Cash, beginning balance


0



73,713Cash, ending balance

$
215,666


$
324,750Interest paid

$
26,081


$
51,298Taxes paid

$
-


$
-Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions


The accompanying notes to the financial statements should be read in conjunction with the above financial statements.








4


DATASCENSION, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Note 1 - HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE COMPANY





Datascension, Inc. (formerly known as Nutek, Inc.) was incorporated in August 1991 under the laws of the State of Nevada as Swiss Technique, Inc. (the "Company") and is engaged in the market research industry.





Datascension International, Inc. and related assets were purchased on September 27, 2001 for $2,200,000 using company shares at fair market value. Datascension is a data solutions company representing a unique expertise in the collecting, storage, processing, and interpretation of data. During 2002, Datascension expanded operations into Costa Rica where it has continued to conduct most of its operations.





NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES





Basis of Accounting





The Company's policy is to prepare the financial statements on the accrual basis of accounting. The fiscal year end is December 31.





Cash and Cash Equivalents





Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased.





Consolidation Policy





The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Datascension, Inc. and Datascension International, Inc. Datascension International, Inc. was merged into the Company during 2008.  All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.





Use of Estimates





The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires that management make estimates and assumptions which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses for the period reported. Actual results may differ from these estimates.





Comprehensive Income





Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income (SFAS 130), requires that total comprehensive income be reported in the financial statements. The Company does not have any items considered to be other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2009.





Income taxes:





The Company follows SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under the asset and liability method of SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. A valuation allowance has been provided for the Company's net deferred tax asset, due to uncertainty of realization.





Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standard Board Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS Statement No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting interim period, disclosure and transition. There were no adjustments required upon adoption of FIN 48.









5


Fixed Assets





Fixed assets are stated at cost. Expenditures that materially increase the life of the assets are capitalized. Ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and the related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized at that time.





Depreciation is computed primarily on the straight-line method for financial statement purposes over the following estimated useful lives:





Leasehold improvements
6.25 yearsComputer equipment
5 yearsFurniture and fixtures
5-10 yearsOffice equipment
5 years





Revenue Recognition





We recognize revenues when survey data is delivered to the client in accordance with the terms of our agreements. Research products are delivered within a short period, generally ranging from a few days to approximately eight weeks. An appropriate deferral is made for direct costs related to contracts in process, and no revenue is recognized until delivery of the data has taken place. Billings rendered in advance of services being performed, as well as customer deposits received in advance, are recorded as a current liability included in deferred revenue. We are required to estimate contract losses, if any, and provide for such losses in the period they are determined and estimable. We do not believe that there are realistic alternatives to our revenue recognition policy given the short period of service delivery and the requirement to deliver completed surveys to our customers. We do not believe there is significant risk of recognizing revenue prematurely since our contracts are standardized, the earnings process is short, and no single project accounts for a significant portion of our revenue.





Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets





In accordance with SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” the Company assesses the impairment of identifiable intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Intangible assets were comprised of website assets. Factors the Company considers to be important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:





1.
Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;





2.
Significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business; and





3.
Significant negative industry or economic trends.





When the Company determines that the carrying value of intangibles may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment and the carrying value of the asset cannot be recovered from projected undiscounted cash flows, the Company records an impairment charge. The Company measures any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the current business model. Significant management judgment is required in determining whether an indicator of impairment exists and in projecting cash flows. A provision for the write down of goodwill and website asset costs had been made during the year ended December 31, 2008..








6


Long-Lived Assets





In accordance with FASB Statement 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the carrying value of intangible assets and other long-lived assets are reviewed, such as other properties and equipment, on a regular basis for the existence of facts or circumstances that may suggest impairment. The Company recognizes impairment when the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flow is less than the carrying amount of the asset. The Company measures impairment losses, if any, as the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value. A provision for the write down of property and equipment asset costs had been made during the year ended December 31, 2008





Foreign Currency Translation





The Company's functional currency is the U.S. dollar. In those instances where DSEN has foreign currency transactions, the financial statements are translated to U.S. dollars in accordance with Statement 52 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Foreign Currency Translation.  Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Gains and losses arising on translation or settlement of foreign-currency-denominated transactions or balances are included in the determination of income. The Company's primary foreign currency transactions are in Costa Rica Colon. The Company has not entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. The Company has had nominal translation or transactions gains or losses of substance to reflect during either the three months ended March 31, 2010 or the year ended December 31, 2009.





Net Loss Per Share





Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period end. The net loss for the period end is divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for that period to arrive a net loss per share.





Diluted net loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if the securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.





Advertising





Advertising costs are expensed when incurred. Advertising for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and the years ended December 31, 2009 amounted to $ 0and $17,833, respectively.








Research and Development





The Company expenses its research and development in the periods incurred.





Concentrations of Credit Risk





Credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counter parties failed completely to perform as contracted. Concentrations of credit risk (whether on or off balance sheet) that arise from financial instruments exist for groups of customers or counter parties when they have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions described below.





The Company operates in one segment, the market research industry. 100% of the Company's customers are located within the United States of America.





Major Customers





During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company had three major clients, AdMax Media (22.9%), Synovate (12.9%), and Kantar (11.6%).  Management believes the loss of one of these key clients would materially affect the operations of the Company in the short term.





During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company had three major clients, Synovate (12.2%), AdMax Media  (10.9%), and Sandelman & Associates  (8.6%). Management believes the loss of one of these key clients would materially affect the operations of the Company in the short term.





7





Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements





In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. However, on February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” (“FSP No. 157-2”), which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). FSP No. 157-2 defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years for items within scope of FSP No. 157-2. The adoption of SFAS No. 157, effective for the year ended December 31, 2008, did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.





In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No.159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an amendment of FASB Statement No.115”. SFAS No.159 permits entities to choose to measure eligible financial instruments and other items at fair value at specified election dates. A business entity shall report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option may be applied instrument by instrument but only upon the entire instrument - not portions of the instrument. Unless a new election date occurs, the fair value option is irrevocable. SFAS No.159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The adoption of SFAS No. 159, effective for the year ended December 31, 2008, did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.





On December 12, 2007, Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 07-01, "Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements Related to the Development and Commercialization of Intellectual Property," ("EITF No. 07-01"), was issued. EITF No. 07-01 prescribes the accounting for collaborations. It requires certain transactions between collaborators to be recorded in the income statement on either a gross or net basis within expenses when certain characteristics exist in the collaboration relationship. EITF No. 07-01 is effective for the Company's collaborations existing after January 1, 2009. The adoption of “EITFNo. 07-01   did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.





In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations,” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”), which replaces FASB Statement No. 141. SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree, the goodwill acquired and the expenses incurred in connection with the acquisition. SFAS No. 141(R) also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is not permitted. As a result, the Company will apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141(R) prospectively to business combinations that close on or after January 1, 2009. An entity may not apply it before that date. Currently, SFAS 141(R) is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. However, if the Company engages in business combination after January 1, 2009, SFAS 141(R) could have a material impact on accounting for the transaction.





In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financials Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 clarifies the accounting for noncontrolling interests and establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, including classification as a component of equity. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 (that is, beginning in the Company’s Fiscal 2009). Earlier adoption is prohibited.  This Statement shall be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this Statement is initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements. The presentation and disclosure requirements shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. As the Company does not have noncontrolling interests in its subsidiary, SFAS 160 is not expected to have a material impact on consolidated financial position or results of operations for the foreseeable future.







8


In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS No. 161”), which amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” to require qualitative disclosure about objectives and strategies in using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about the underlying credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. SFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring transparency about the location and amounts of derivative instruments in an entity’s financial statements; how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect its financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. This Statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The Company does not believe SFAS No. 161 has a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures for the fiscal and interim periods beginning January 1, 2009.





In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The current GAAP hierarchy, as set forth in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement on Auditing Standards No. 69, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, has been criticized because (1) it is directed to the auditor rather than the entity, (2) it is complex, and (3) it ranks FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts. The FASB believes that the GAAP hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditor) that is responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Accordingly, the FASB concluded that the GAAP hierarchy should reside in the accounting literature established by the FASB and is issuing this Statement to achieve that result. This Statement is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The adoption of FASB 162  did not  have a material impact on the Company’s financial position.





In June 2008, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF 07-05, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (“EITF 07-05”), which supersedes the definition in EITF 06-01, “Accounting for Consideration Given by a Service Provider to Manufacturers or Resellers of Equipment necessary for an End-Customer to Receive Service from a Service Provider” for periods beginning after December 15, 2008. The objective of EITF 07-05 is to provide guidance for determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or Embedded Feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock and it applies to any freestanding financial instrument or embedded feature that has all the characteristics of a derivative in FASB 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” for purposes of determining whether that instrument or embedded feature qualifies for the first part of the scope exception in paragraph 11(a) of SFAS 133 (“the paragraph 11(a) Exception”). EITF 07-05 also applies to any freestanding financial instrument that is potentially settled in an entity’s own stock, regardless of whether the instrument is within the scope of EITF 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock.” The Company has determined EITF 07-05 does not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.







In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” Under the FSP, unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities, and should be included in the two-class method of computing EPS. The FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years, and did not expect to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.







9


In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active”, (“FSP 157-3”), to clarify the application of the provisions of SFAS 157 in an inactive market and how an entity would determine fair value in an inactive market. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance and applies to the Company’s current financial statements. The application of the provisions of FSP 157-3 did not materially impact the Company’s results of operations or financial condition for the three months ended March 31, 2010.





Accounts Receivable





Accounts receivable are stated at the amount management expects to collect from outstanding balances. Management provides for probable uncollectible amounts through a charge to earnings and a credit to a valuation allowance based on its assessment of the current status of individual accounts. Balances outstanding after management has used reasonable collection efforts are written off through a charge to the valuation allowance and a credit to trade accounts receivable. Changes in the valuation allowance have not been material to the financial statements.





Stock Based Compensation





The Company applies SFAS 123R in accounting for stock options issued to employees. For stock options and warrants issued to non-employees, the Company applies SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, which requires the recognition of compensation cost based upon the fair value of stock options at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.





NOTE 3 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT





Property and equipment are made up of the following as of March 31, 2010:





Computer equipment

$
986,622Office equipment


450,949Lease


880,959Vehicles


154,983Software


14,4852,487,998Less accumulated depreciation and amortization


1,282,241$
1,205,757





Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $97,809.





NOTE 4 – LONG-TERM DEBT





Since November 2004, the Company had entered into several different convertible debt agreements, the most recent being December 12, 2006. In past funding arrangements, the specific terms of the funding arrangements contained certain covenants and liquidated damages which were deemed to make the notes  be considered non-conventional. Such treatment required a valuation of all derivative items of the notes, which created a liability on the balance sheets, coupled with a liability for the value of any warrants that were outstanding at the balance sheet date. The December 2006 note settled all prior interest, liquidated damages and other perceived "negative" items that were tainting the debt. The latter note also served to amend and limit the liabilities, so as to satisfy the EITF 00-27 requirements and end the requirement of the Company to have the derivative accounting treatment. Below is a summary of the major terms of the notes outstanding as of March 31, 2009.





Upon the entering into of the December 2006 transaction, the Company removed all of the prior derivative liability portions of the convertible debt, as all clauses had been removed from the debts and agreements. This resulted in an expense to remove the debt discounts that were previously being accreted, as well as the financing costs being accreted over the remaining term. Concurrently, there was an income item reported  for a corresponding write off of the liabilities associated with derivatives and the warrant liabilities on the books.






10





In November 2004, the Company issued $1,875,000 in principal amount of secured promissory notes. As part of the financing transaction, the Company issued warrants to purchase 3,125,000 shares of common stock at a per share purchase price of $0.30 per share.





The Notes accrue interest at a rate of prime + 3% per annum. The notes were due and payable in November 2007. The notes were entered into pursuant to the terms of a subscription agreement between the Company and the Holder.  The $1,875,000 in proceeds from the financing transaction were originally allocated to the debt features and to the warrants based upon their fair values. After the latter allocations, there was $170,061 of remaining value to be allocated to the long-term debt on the financial statements. The debt discount was being accreted using the effective interest method over the term of the note.





In 2007, 6,559,919 shares were issued to settle $2,055,065 of principal and interest on the convertible notes. An additional 2,841,667 shares were issued to satisfy outstanding warrants.





LONGVIEW FUND, L.P. AND ALPHA CAPITAL ANSTALT





In June 2006, the Company issued two secured convertible promissory notes. One note is due to Long View Fund L.P. (“Longview”) and had a principal amount of $1,702,859 and the other note due to Alpha Capital Anstalt (“Alpha”) had a principal amount of $571,429. As part of the financing transaction, the Company issued warrants to purchase 4,865,311 shares of common stock at a per share purchase price of $0.40 per share.





The $1,702,859 promissory note due Longview accrues interest at a rate of 6% per annum. Interest is to be paid quarterly.  The note was due and payable in June 2008. It was entered into pursuant to the terms of a subscription agreement between the Company and the Holder.  The $1,702,859 in proceeds from the financing transaction were allocated to the debt features and to the warrants based upon their fair values. After the latter allocations, there was $318,796 of remaining value to be allocated to the long-term debt in the financial statements. The debt discount was being accreted using the effective interest method over the term of the note.





In December, 2007, accrued interest of $25,753 was added to the note due to Longview increasing the principal amount of the note to $1,728,612.  In September, 2009, accrued interest of $84,898 and interest due for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 of $34,856 was added to the note due to Longview increasing the principal amount of the note to $1,848,366.  The interest rate beginning September 30, 2009 on the note is 8% per annum








In December 2006, the Company issued $2,065,458 in principal amount in a secured promissory note to Longview. As part of the financing transaction, 1,280,000 warrants were issued to the note holder of the December 2006 notes with a 5 year term and a $0.45 exercise price. In 2007, the note holder converted some debt and interest into shares of stock along with the exercise of the warrants which were attached to the note.





The note due Longview described in the preceding paragraph accrues interest at a rate 14% per annum. The note was due and payable in December 2008.  This note is not convertible into common stock of the Company. Upon issuance, the Company allocated $1,867,328 to the debt and $198,130 to the warrants based on the relative fair values of each. The value of the warrants was determined using 56% volatility, five year terms, and a $0.45 exercise price. The debt discount of $198,130 was amortized over the two year term of the note.





In December 2007 accrued interest of $40,685 was added to the note due to Longview increasing the amount of the note at December 31, 2007 to $1,193,643.  In September, 2009, accrued interest of $139,182.10 and interest due for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 of $24,069 was added to the note due Longview increasing the principal amount of the note to $1,356,894.  The interest rate beginning September 30, 2009 on the note is 8% per annum. ,









11


In September, 2009, the Company had three  promissory notes to Alpha Capital Anstalt in the amount of $832,594.  Accrued interest of $186,720 and interest due for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 of $20,556 was added to the notes due Alpha Capital Anstalt increasing the total amount of the loans to $1,039,870. at an interest rate of 14% per annum. The interest rate beginning September 30, 2009 on the notes is 8$ per annum.





Below is a summary of secured convertible promissory notes payable due to Longview and Alpha and related accrued interest payable at March 31, 2010.





Longview





Notes

$
3,205,260Accrued interest payable


63,227$
3,268,487





Alpha





Notes

$
1,039,870Accrued interest payable


13,181$
1,053,051





Interest expenses incurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 on the above tabled debt due to Longview and Alpha is as follows:





Longview

$
63,227Alpha


20,107$
84,334





On March 31, 2009, The Company entered into Waiver of Default Interest Agreements with each of Longview Fund, L.P. and Alpha Capital Anstalt.  These Agreements call for the making of two monthly interest payments at nondefaulted interest rates to each of Longview Fund and Alpha Capital until all past due interest is paid in full to each of Longview Fund and Alpha Capital and in consideration of these payments being made, both companies have agreed to waive default interest rates and additional interest owed due to the otherwise increase of interest rates existing in indebtedness between the Company and each of Longview Fund L.P. and Alpha Capital Anstalt, in the amounts of $117,215 and $30,031, respectively.  The reductions in interest due are reflected in the above stated interest numbers.





All of the notes have been extended to March 31, 2011








OTHER CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES





On or about September 4, 2008, the Company borrowed $400,000 from three individuals.  The Notes have a term of 18 months from the date of issuance and bear interest at the rate of $12% per annum.  Interest is due and payable quarterly in arrears during the term of the Notes and principal and accrued and unpaid interest are due in full at maturity.  Warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued in connection therewith.  The warrants have an exercise price of $.10 per share and a term of five years from the date of issuance.  At March 31, 2010 the individuals agreed to extend the note with an increase in the interest rate to 14% with monthly principal and interest payments.





Based upon the relative fair values of the convertible debt and warrants none of the proceeds of $400,000 has been allocated as additional paid in capital to the warrants.





12


NOTE 5 – SHORT-TERM NOTES PAYABLE





Short-term notes payable consist of the following at March 31, 2010





A convertible note payable to three individuals which bear interest at 14% per annum           $  400,000





A demand note payable to Lou Persico, Chairman and CEO of Datascension which


Bears interest at 8% per annum:                                                                                                   100,000





Total short-term notes payable at March 31, 2010$  500,000








NOTE 6. - STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT) EQUITY





During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company did not issue any shares of common stock.








NOTE 7 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES





Leases





The Company is committed under several non-cancelable lease agreements for office space with various expiration dates through 2013.





At March 31, 2010, aggregate future minimum payments under these leases, are as follows:





2010

$
324,1402011


391,5472012


367,5002013


131,075Total

$
1,214,262





Rent expense was$108,105 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and  $110,809 for the three months ended March 31, 2009.








NOTE 8 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS








Series B Preferred Stock





Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 505,900 of preferred stock Series B issued and outstanding.





The Series B preferred shares pursuant to the certificate of designation were to be converted two years after issuance.  To date this conversion has not been completed.








13


Series C Preferred Stock





On July 25, 2008, the Company filed a Certificate of Designation with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada authorizing a series of preferred stock, under its articles of incorporation, known as “Series C Preferred Stock”. This Certificate of Designation was approved by the Registrant’s Board of Directors. The Certificate of Designation sets forth the following terms for the Series C Preferred Stock:





Authorized Shares:

1,000Per Share Stated Value:

$4,500Liquidation Preference:

Per share Stated ValueConversion Price into Common Stock:

$.30 per share, as adjusted from time to time as set forth in the Certificate of DesignationVoting Rights:

The Series C Preferred Shares shall vote along with the Common Stock on an as converted basis and shall have two votes per share





On July 25, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with Longview Fund, pursuant to which the Longview Fund exchanged 15,000,000 shares of its Common Stock for receipt of 1,000 shares of its Series C Preferred Stock.





Since the fair value of the convertible Preferred Stock received in exchange for the 15,000,000 shares of its Common Stock would be immediately exchangeable into common stock with a trading price lower than the conversion price, the Company does not have a beneficial conversion feature to recognize by way of charge to the Statement of Operation for the three months ended March 31, 2009.





Extension of Maturity Dates of Certain Notes





On or about August 12, 2008, Longview Fund, L.P. extended the maturity date of its promissory notes due from the Company and issued in June 2006 and December 2006 to January 15, 2010, and Alpha Capital Anstalt extended the maturity date of its promissory notes due from the Company and issued in November 2004, June 2006 and December 2006 to January 15, 2010. A further discussion of these notes is set forth in Note 4 above.








Longview Fund





As of March 31, 2010, Longview Fund, L.P. owned 14.6% of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company. Due to this stock ownership, the Company is controlled by Longview Fund, L.P. and is deemed a “controlled corporation”. As of July 30, 2008, due to the exchange of 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, into shares of Series C Preferred Stock, which holds two votes per share when voting alongside the Common Stock of the Company, Longview Fund controls 64.4% voting control of the Company. See this footnote supra  for a further description of the Series C Preferred Stock.





Longview Fund, L.P. may take actions that conflict with the interests of other shareholders. Due to the 64.4% ownership of voting control, Longview Fund, L.P. has substantial control over the Company and has substantial power to elect directors and to generally approve all actions requiring the approval of the holders of the Company’s voting stock. See Note 4 above for a discussion of certain promissory notes due by the Company to Longview Fund, L.P.





Other Related Parties





On December 31, 2008, Scott Kincer resigned as the CEO, President and a Director of the issuer to pursue other opportunities.  Pursuant to a Separation Agreement between the parties which is effective as of December 31, 2008, the issuer is paying Mr. Kincer the sum of $64,750 over a period of five and one half months as well as reimbursing him for accrued and unpaid expenses. The agreement contains other standard terms and provisions as to releases and the like. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 includes provision for the amount due under this agreement.   At March 31, 2010 all payments had been made to Mr. Kincer.





There are no other related party transactions, other than that stated above and in Notes 5.





14





NOTE 9 - FOREIGN OPERATIONS





The Company has its principal operating facilities located in  Costa Rica, SA.  The Company currently coordinates all foreign operations, and supervision activities using part time employees, consultants and contract labor. Approximately 99% of the Company's workforce is outside of the United States. Currently 90% of the company's clients are US based companies. Any resulting foreign exchange fluctuations do not affect the payment of employees, contract labor or off shore operations.





NOTE 10 - CREDIT AGREEMENT





Wells Fargo





On November 7, 2008, the Company entered into an Account Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”) pursuant to which Wells Fargo agreed to purchase certain accounts receivable from the Company from time to time, up to $4.5 million, at a price equal to the face value of each such receivable less a discount equal to .5% plus the then existing prime rate, plus three percent plus other fees and charges. Any accounts sold to Wells Fargo for which payment is not received within the proscribed time periods in the Agreement shall be subject to repurchase by the Company. To secure this repurchase and other obligations of the Company thereunder, the Company granted a first lien on all of its assets to Wells Fargo. In connection therewith, the Longview Fund and Alpha Capital Anstalt agreed to subordinate their security interests in the Company’s collateral to the security interests of Wells Fargo.











NOTE 11 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS





None.





Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.





Introduction





The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our accompanying financial statements and the notes to those financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following discussion includes forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these forward- looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report.





Overview





Revenue Recognition.





We recognize revenues when survey data is delivered to the client in accordance with the terms of our agreements. Research products are delivered within a short period, generally ranging from a few days to approximately eight weeks. An appropriate deferral is made for direct costs related to contracts in process, and no revenue is recognized until delivery of the data has taken place. Billings rendered in advance of services being performed, as well as customer deposits received in advance, are recorded as a current liability included in deferred revenue. We are required to estimate contract losses, if any, and provide for such losses in the period they are determined and estimable. We do not believe that there are realistic alternatives to our revenue recognition policy given the short period of service delivery and the requirement to deliver completed surveys to our customers. We do not believe there is significant risk of recognizing revenue prematurely since our contracts are standardized, the earnings process is short, and no single project accounts for a significant portion of our revenue.





15


Plan of Operation





(a) Cash Requirements





Estimated future cash requirements





As discussed above DSEN intends to meet its financial needs for operations through the collection of accounts receivable and servicing of current contracts.





DSEN’s capital resources are comprised primarily of private investors, who are either existing contacts of DSEN’s current or past management or who come to the attention of the Company through brokers, financial institutions and other intermediaries. DSEN’s access to capital is always dependent upon general financial market conditions. DSEN's capital resources are not anticipated to change materially during the rest of 2010.





DSEN has financed operations through the collections of accounts receivable, servicing of existing contracts and the sale of common stock and through financing from financial institutions. In order to sustain operations in the near term, it is anticipated that DSEN has sufficient working capital in that it has a receivables purchase line with Wells Fargo.





DSEN's future capital requirements will depend on numerous factors, including the profitability of our research projects and our ability to control costs. We believe that our current assets will be sufficient to meet our operating expenses and capital expenditures. However, we cannot predict when and if any additional capital contributions may be needed and we may need to seek one or more substantial new investors. New investors could cause substantial dilution to existing stockholders.





There can be no assurances that DSEN will be successful in raising additional capital via debt or equity funding, or that any such transactions, if consummated, will be on terms favorable to DSEN. In the event that additional capital is not obtained from other sources, it may become necessary to alter development plans or otherwise abandon certain ventures.





If DSEN needs to raise additional funds in order to fund expansion, develop new or enhanced services or products, respond to competitive pressures or acquire complementary products, businesses or technologies, any additional funds raised through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of the stockholders of DSEN will be reduced, stockholders may experience additional dilution and such securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of DSEN's Common Stock.





DSEN has a contractual restriction on its ability to incur debt. Pursuant to subscription agreements for certain of its fundings, DSEN cannot enter into any further equity or convertible debt financings, without consent, until the date the notes have been fully paid.





A result of this restriction is that any additional funds needed with most likely have to be provided by the current note holders or would require their consent.


In the event that we are required to repay the balance of these notes in cash on demand, we would be forced to seek additional funding which would probably be at a large discount. If we were unable to obtain the additional funding, we may be forced to close down operations (see risk factors for addition discussion).





Expected Significant Changes in the Number of Contract Workers





DSEN does not expect any significant change in the number of contract workers over the next 12 months of operations. As noted previously, DSEN currently coordinates most operations using part time employees, consultants and contract labor.   In the next twelve months, the Company's focus is on expanding our client base to meet or exceed the capacity that our new space provides us, while also seeking a strategic acquisition.





16


Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations





For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company generated $2,702,191 in revenues as compared to $3,773,187 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, a decrease of $1,070,996 or 28.4%. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company’s cost of goods sold was $2,417,430 as compared to $3,106,504 during the three months ended March 31, 2009, a decrease of $689,0741 or 22.1%. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company generated a gross profit of $284,761 compared to $666,683 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, a decrease of $381,922 or 57.2%. The decrease in revenue and in cost of goods sold resulted primarily due to the current general economic downturn which has affected its customers resulting in less outsourcing for services provided by the Company.   For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company increased its working capital position by $ 36,867  from $(5,479,139) as of March 31, 2009 to $ (5,442,272) as of March 31, 2010.





Analysis of the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009





The Company had a net loss of $194,723 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to a net loss of $8,911 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, an increase in net loss of $203,634





Total selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $374,179 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $437,328 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, a decrease of $63,149 or 14.4%. The decrease in expenses is due mainly to the reduction in executive salaries along with a reduction in marketing costs and a general reduction in all administrative costs.





Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $97,809 compared to $91,617 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, an increase of $6,192 or 6.7%.








Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $157,599 compared to $145,945 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 an increase of $11,654 or 8.0%.  The increase is due to interest on local loans in Costa Rica.





Liquidity and Capital Resources





Liquidity





For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company increased its working capital position by $ 36,867 from $(5,479,139) as of March 31, 2009 to $ (5,442,272) as of March 31, 2010.





Management believes that its revenues from operations and collections on accounts receivable will meet its minimum general and administrative cost requirements and provide the basic liquidity DSEN needs to operate at current levels over the next twelve months.





Wells Fargo





On November 7, 2008, the Company entered into an Account Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”) pursuant to which Wells Fargo agreed to purchase certain accounts receivable from the Company from time to time, up to $4.5 million, at a price equal to the face value of each such receivable less a discount equal to .5% plus the then existing prime rate, plus three percent plus other fees and charges. Any accounts sold to Wells Fargo for which payment is not received within the proscribed time periods in the Agreement shall be subject to repurchase by the Company. To secure this repurchase and other obligations of the Company thereunder, the Company granted a first lien on all of its assets to Wells Fargo. In connection therewith, the Longview Fund and Alpha Capital Anstalt agreed to subordinate their security interests in the Company’s collateral to the security interests of Wells Fargo.





The short term source of liquidity is from operations. Any long term needs that are above and beyond what is derived from operations would come from outside sources. The long term needs and possible sources of funds are not identified at this time. If required, DSEN could stop growing and hold operations at the current level without any need for additional funding. However, additional funding will be required to execute its business plan of expanding the Costa Rica operations in order to expand the inbound call center initiative above what was accomplished in 2008 in terms of utilizing capacity at its new facility. The balance of the funding required to execute DSEN's planning will need to be obtained from other sources such as debt or the sale of additional equity.





17


The call center initiative is as follows: we currently utilize the majority of our interviewing stations for no more than six hours per day. The majority of those six hour shifts are during the early afternoon/evening. We are pursuing day time work.





On March 31, 2010 DSEN had total assets of $2,287,515 compared to $3,304,292 on March 31, 2009, a decrease of $1,016,777. The decrease in assets is due to the decrease in revenues for the quarter.  DSEN had a total stockholders' equity (deficit) of $(4,521,300) on March 31, 2010 compared to $(3,766,226) on March  31, 2009, a decrease in stockholders’ equity of $755,034.





Capital Resources





The Company’s capital resources are comprised primarily of private investors who are either existing contacts of Datascension's management or who come to the attention of the Registrant through brokers, financial institutions and other intermediaries. Datascension's access to capital is always dependent upon general financial market conditions, especially those which pertain to venture capital situations.





Material Commitments for Capital Expenditures.





The Company has made no material commitments for future expansion. When potential expansion or the need for expansion arises, management reviews the potential of each property as its leases come up for renewal and makes a decision whether or not to renew each lease or expand the current facilities, in light of the Company's business planning at that time.





The Company has no agreements with management, investors, shareholders or anyone else respecting additional financing at this time. Because of the nature of the Company’s business, there are no trends in the nature of its capital resources which could be considered predictable.





Inflation





The Company's results of operations have not been affected by inflation; however,  management does expect inflation may have a material impact on its operations in the future.





Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.





The company currently does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.





Safe Harbor





The discussions of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes pertaining to them that appear elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Statements made in this Form 10-K that are not historical or current facts are "forward- looking statements" made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements often can be identified by the use of terms such as "may," "will," "expect," "believe," "anticipate," "estimate," "approximate" or "continue," or the negative thereof. The Company intends that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors for such statements. The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Any forward-looking statements represent management's best judgment as to what may occur in the future. However, forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and important factors beyond the control of the Company that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from historical results of operations and events and those presently anticipated or projected. These factors include adverse economic conditions, risks of foreign operation, entry of new and stronger competitors, inadequate capital and unexpected costs. The Company disclaims any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statement or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.







18


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk





Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the market-driven increase or decrease in interest rates, and the impact of those changes on the Company’s ability to realize a return on invested or available funds. We ensure the safety and preservation of our invested principal funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. We mitigate default risk by investing in short term high-credit investment grade securities and/or commercial checking and savings accounts.





ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES





Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures





As of the end of the period covered by our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, management performed, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the report we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on the evaluation and the identification of the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting described below, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were  effective.





Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting





Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.





Management has conducted, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, an assessment, including testing of the effectiveness, of our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2010. Management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting was conducted using the criteria in Internal Control over Financial Reporting - Guidance for Smaller Public Companiesissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).





A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In connection with our management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we identified no following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2010:





This quarterly report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Commission that permit us to provide only management's report in this quarterly report.







19


PART II – OTHER INFORMATION





Item 1. Legal Proceedings.





DSEN is not a party to any pending material legal proceeding. To the knowledge of management, no federal, state or local governmental agency is presently contemplating any proceeding against DSEN. To the knowledge of management, no director, executive officer or affiliate of DSEN, any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of DSEN's common stock is a party adverse to DSEN or has a material interest adverse to DSEN in any proceeding.





Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Security and Use of Proceeds.





None.





Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities





None.





Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders





None.





Item 5. Other Information





None.





Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K





Exhibits





(a) Exhibit 31. Certifications required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d- 14(a)





31.1 and 32.2 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1850 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





(b) Exhibit 32. Certifications required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d- 14(b) and section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





32.1 and 32.2 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1850 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





(c) Reports on Form 8-K





Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 6, 2009





(d) Other Exhibits





None


20





SIGNATURES





In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Datascension, Inc./s/ Lou PersicoLou PersicoPresident, Chairman and Director(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ David P. LiebermanDavid P. Lieberman(Principal Financial Officer)Date: May 17, 2010





21