alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     OTHER         
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                      OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                              4,087
<SECURITIES>                                            0       
<RECEIVABLES>                                      36,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                        3,470
<INVENTORY>                                        25,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   63,112
<PP&E>                                              2,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                        221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     65,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              21,161
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                               68
<OTHER-SE>                                         36,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       65,402
<SALES>                                           122,723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  122,723
<CGS>                                              91,087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      18,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    12,899
<INCOME-TAX>                                        3,983
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 8,916
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        8,916
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        1.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.26
                         

</TABLE>
§ 380.66 Administrative expenses of SIPC. ( a ) In carrying out its responsibilities, SIPC, as trustee for a covered broker or dealer, may utilize the services of third parties, including private attorneys, accountants, consultants, advisors, outside experts, and other third party professionals. SIPC shall have an allowed claim for administrative expenses for any amounts paid by SIPC for such services to the extent that such services are available in the private sector, and utilization of such services is practicable, efficient, and cost effective. The term *administrative expenses of SIPC* includes the costs and expenses of such attorneys, accountants, consultants, advisors, outside experts, and other third party professionals, and other expenses that would be allowable to a third party trustee under 15 U.S.C. 78eee(b)(5)(A), including the costs and expenses of SIPC employees that would be allowable pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78fff(e).
( b ) The term *administrative expenses of SIPC* shall not include advances from SIPC to satisfy customer claims for net equity.
#### George Cohen, Respondent, *v.*Benjamin Weill, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

J. P. Donnelly, for appellant.

A. Furber, for respondent.

*765
      *Per Curiam.*

We see no reason upon the merits of the case to reverse the judgment of the court below. The trial justice, however, erred in allowing to the plaintiff as part of his costs the expenses incurred by the latter, in obtaining the transcript of the stenographer’s minutes which was furnished to the court below. This disbursement amounted to thirty-five dollars and eighty cents. The judgment will, therefore, be modified by deducting this amount therefrom, and as so modified will be affirmed, without costs.

Judgment modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegee.ich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment modified and as modified affirmed, without costs.
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification**          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Elcom International, Inc., aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-KSB”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, theperiods presented in the Form 10-KSB.        Dated: March 23, 2006 /s/ Laurence F. Mulhern   Laurence F. Mulhern   Chief Financial Officer
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22

- 0490

_________________ IN RE THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF: ALBERT J. LARGHI, Deceased. ANTHONY CHARLES LARGHI and MARY PATRICIA FLEMING,

Foreign Ancillary Personal Representatives and Appellees, MARISA ROOT,

Petitioner

- Heir and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a fiv e - justice pa nel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Jennifer B. Lint , District Judge

. For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 15 2023

03/15/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0490
#### Sidney M. HALL et ux *v.*Julia Jeanette BLANFORD

73-37

494 S.W. 2d 714

Opinion delivered May 28, 1973

*Dan On*and *Hodges, Hodges ir Hodges,*for appellants.

*591
      *Harkey & Walmsley,*for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellants Mr. and Mrs. Sidney M. Hall brought this action against appellee Julia Jeanette Blanford to vacate and set aside a confirmation of title decree rendered in favor of appellee pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-1901 (Repl. 1962), et. seq. Upon motion of appellee, the Chancellor dismissed appellants’ complaint on the ground that it constituted a collateral attack. Hence this appeal.

Appellants did not follow Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-1910 (Repl. 1962), in seeking to set aside and vacate the confirmation decree in favor of appellee but filed a separate action in which they alleged that the confirmation decree rendered on July 21, 1971, in favor of appellee was only upon publication of warning order notifying anyone claiming any interest in the land to appear within thirty days. The complaint further alleged:

> “(c) That the said Sidney M. Hall and Quanita Hall, plaintiffs herein, have claimed the land continuously, openly, exclusively, notoriously, and adversely since July 7, 1946, and that they have paid the taxes on same every year for the past twenty-five (25) years.

> “(d) That plaintiffs were not notified of the pendency of this. suit even though the defendant knew that they claimed title to the land and also knew the address of the above plaintiffs and could have notified them personally of the pendency of said suit or by appointing an attorney ad litem to notify them.”

In *Welch*v. *Burton,*221 Ark. 173, 252 S.W. 2d 411 (1952), *Hensley*v. *Phillips,*215 Ark 543, 221 S.W. 2d 412 (1949), *Union Sawmill Co.*v. *Rowland,*178 Ark. 372, 10 S.W. 2d 858 (1928), and *Grayling Lumber Co.*v. *Tillar,*162 Ark. 221, 258 S.W. 132 (1924), we held that where a known claimant or one who had paid taxes thereon within seven years is not made a party defendant to a quiet title action, that party, or those claiming under him, can set aside and vacate in a separate action the decree of confirmation. Those cases also point out that *592the attack m such a case is a direct attack on the decree of confirmation. See also Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-1902 and § 34-1909 (Repl. 1962).

Reversed and remanded.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Greenhouse gas technology news[**
 
SuDoc Number:EP 1.2:G 83/5:

Item Number:0431-I-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000606248
 
2000: AprDec| 2001| 2002 | 2003 | 2004
 
March 5, 2020
Year Quarter Operating No. of Periods Percent of Time

Hours > 20% Opacity > 20% Opacity

2008 1 2,064 145 0.703

2008 2 2,121 32 0.151

2008 3 2,098 12 0.057

2008 4 2,024 12 0.059

Total 8,307 201

Average 2,076.8 50.25 0.242

2009 1 2,039 16 0.078

2009 2 2,001 50 0.250

2009 3 1,727 8 0.046

2009 4 1,455 3 0.021

Total 7,222 77

Average 1805.5 19.25 0.107

2010 1 2,060 76 0.369

2010 2 2,184 2 0.009

2010 3 2,145 360 1.678

2010 4 2,148 7 0.033

Total 8,537 445

Average 2,134.25 111.25 0.521

M.R. Young Station 

Unit 1
3-Year 8,022 241 0.300

Average
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2992

To modify the calculation of back pay for persons who were approved for 

promotion as members of the Navy and Marine Corps while interned 

as prisoners of war during World War II to take into account changes 

in the Consumer Price Index. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 3, 2003

Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To modify the calculation of back pay for persons who were 

approved for promotion as members of the Navy and 

Marine Corps while interned as prisoners of war during 

World War II to take into account changes in the Consumer Price Index.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2992 IH 

1 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF AMOUNT OF BACK PAY FOR 

2 MEMBERS OF NAVY AND MARINE CORPS SE3 LECTED FOR PROMOTION WHILE INTERNED 

4 AS PRISONERS OF WAR DURING WORLD WAR 

5 II TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT CHANGES IN CON6 SUMER PRICE INDEX. 

7 (a) MODIFICATION.—Section 667(c) of the Floyd D. 

8 Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

9 Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 

10 114 Stat. 1654A–170) is amended by adding at the end 

11 the following new paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(3) The amount determined for a person under 

13 paragraph (1) shall be increased to reflect increases in 

14 cost of living since the basic pay referred to in paragraph 

15 (1)(B) was paid to or for that person, calculated on the 

16 basis of the Consumer Price Index (all items—United 

17 States city average) published monthly by the Bureau of 

18 Labor Statistics.’’. 

19 (b) RECALCULATION OF PREVIOUS PAYMENTS.—In 

20 the case of any payment of back pay made to or for a 

21 person under section 667 of the Floyd D. Spence National 

22 Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 before the 

23 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 

24 Navy shall—
3

•HR 2992 IH 

1 (1) recalculate the amount of back pay to which 

2 the person is entitled by reason of the amendment 

3 made by subsection (a); and 

4 (2) if the amount of back pay, as so recal5 culated, exceeds the amount of back pay so paid, pay 

6 the person, or the surviving spouse of the person, an 

7 amount equal to the excess.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,681
<SECURITIES>                                    12,284
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                       480
<INVENTORY>                                      3,352
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,846
<PP&E>                                           9,608
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,699
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,699
<SALES>                                         41,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,193
<CGS>                                           14,467
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,467
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,154
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   274
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,074
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,309
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,765
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,765
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Net income per share for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996 has been 
restated to conform to SFAS 128. Primary and fullly dilutd net income per share 
computed under the provisions of APB 15 was historically reported as $0.59 and
$0.59 per share, respectively.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24970]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1646]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 65, Panama City, FL

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Panama City Port Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade 
Zone 65, submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand 
FTZ 65 to include two sites in Chipley, Florida, and expand existing 
Site 3 in Panama City, Florida, adjacent to and within the Panama City 
Customs and Border Protection port of entry, respectively (FTZ Docket 
71-2008, filed 12/16/2008);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (73 FR 79048, 12/24/2008) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 65 is approved, subject to the FTZ 
Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of September 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Pierre Duy,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-24970 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00410-CV

COBRA ACQUISITIONS LLC and Arty Straehla,

Appellants

v.

AL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI22581

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the trial court’s June 4, 

2019 order granting AL Global Services, LLC’s motion to stay arbitration is REVERSED, and 

this case is REMANDED to the trial court for entry of an order (1) denying the motion to stay 

arbitration in its entirety, and (2) ordering the parties to arbitrate the claims presented in Cobra 

Acquisitions LLC and Arty Straehla’s May 15, 2019 amended demand for arbitration. It is 

ORDERED that Appellants Cobra Acquisitions LLC and Arty Straehla recover their costs of 

appeal from Appellee AL Global Services, LLC.

SIGNED April 22, 2020.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 10.35


                               January 28, 1998



Brent A. Hanby, EVP & CFO
National Home Centers, Inc.
Highway 265 North
P. O. Box 789
Springdale, Arkansas  72765

Dear Brent:

The REQUESTED WAIVER of the 10/31/97 THIRD QUARTER INTEREST COVERAGE covenant
default has been APPROVED by BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc.  This waiver
pertains only to this covenant and the period mentioned.  All other terms of the
Loan and Security Agreement remain unchanged.

The approval of the noted covenant waiver is subject to a waiver fee of
$10,000.00, which will be charged directly to National Home Centers revolving
loan.

Yours Sincerely,



Francesca M. Gastil
Senior Account Executive
BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc.
§ 367.9 Imputation of causes. ( a ) Where there is cause to suspend and/or exclude any affiliated business entity of the contractor, that conduct may be imputed to the contractor if the conduct occurred in connection with the affiliated business entity's performance of duties for or on behalf of the contractor, or with the contractor's knowledge, approval, or acquiescence. The contractor's acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct shall be evidence of such knowledge, approval, or acquiescence.
( b ) Where there is cause to suspend and/or exclude any contractor, that conduct may be imputed to any affiliated business entity, key employee, or management official of a contractor who participated in, knew of or had reason to know of the contractor's conduct.
( c ) Where there is cause to suspend and/or exclude a key employee or management official of a contractor, that cause may be imputed to the contractor if the conduct occurred in connection with the key employee or management official's performance of duties for or on behalf of the contractor, or with the contractor's knowledge, approval, or acquiescence. The contractor's acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct shall be evidence of such knowledge, approval, or acquiescence.
( d ) Where there is cause to suspend and/or exclude one contractor participating in a joint venture or similar arrangement, that cause may be imputed to other participating contractors if the conduct occurred for or on behalf of the joint venture or similar arrangement, or with the knowledge, approval, or acquiescence of these contractors. Acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct shall be evidence of such knowledge, approval, or acquiescence.
( e ) Where there is cause to suspend and/or exclude a subcontractor, that cause may be imputed to the contractor for which the subcontractor performed services, if the conduct occurred for or on behalf of the contractor and with the contractor's knowledge, approval, or acquiescence. Acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct shall be evidence of such knowledge, approval, or acquiescence.
#### § 366.8 Who can grant a waiver of a prohibition or conflict of interest?

The FDIC's Board of Directors delegates to the Chairman, or his designee, authority to issue waivers and implement procedures for part 366.
#### § 308.137 Effective date of order imposing sanctions.

An order issued by the Board of Directors after a hearing or an order issued upon default shall become effective at the expiration of 30 days after the service of the order, except that an order of censure, denial, or revocation of registration is effective when served. An order issued upon consent shall become effective at the time specified therein. All orders shall remain effective and enforceable except to the extent they are stayed, modified, terminated, or set aside by the Board of Directors, its designee, or a reviewing court, provided that orders of suspension shall continue in effect no longer than 12 months.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 10.60


                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                           ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
                          EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
                             (May 2000 Restatement)



                  ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, having established the ABM
Industries Incorporated 1985 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and having amended and
restated the Plan as the Employee Stock Purchase Plan as of May 1, 2000 (the
"Plan"), hereby amends the Plan, effective as of March 20, 2001, by amending the
second sentence of the Plan to read as follows:

                  An aggregate of 8,600,000 shares of such stock may be issued
under the Plan.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ABM Industries Incorporated, by its duly
authorized officer, has executed this Amendment No. 1 on the date indicated
below.



                                 ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED



Dated:   March 21 , 2001         By      /s/ Lorraine P. O'Hara
                                    ----------------------------------
                                 Title:  Assistant Corporate Secretary