alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000795662
<NAME> STERLING CHEMICALS HOLDING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  134,942
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,367)
<INVENTORY>                                    100,270
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               262,612
<PP&E>                                         748,896
<DEPRECIATION>                               (274,665)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 833,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          153,091
<BONDS>                                        884,784
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           17,013
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                   (319,798)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   833,190
<SALES>                                        434,740
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               434,740
<CGS>                                          397,855
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  397,855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,620
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (40,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (13,575)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,433)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,433)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.28)
        

</TABLE>
§ 611.1240 Voting record date and stockholder approval. ( a ) *Stockholder meeting.* You must call the meeting by written notice in compliance with your bylaws. The stockholder meeting to vote on the termination must occur at least 60 days after our approval of the plan of termination (or, if we take no action, at least 60 days after the end of our approval period).
( b ) *Voting record date.* The voting record date may not be more than 70 days before the stockholders' meeting.
( c ) *Quorum requirement for termination vote.* At least 30 percent, unless your bylaws provide for a higher quorum, of the voting stockholders of the institution must be present at the meeting either in person or by proxy in order to hold the vote on the termination.
( d ) *Approval requirement.* The affirmative vote of a majority of the voting stockholders of the institution present and voting or voting by proxy at the duly authorized meeting at which a quorum is present as prescribed in paragraph (c) of this section is required for approval of the termination.
( e ) *Voting procedures.* The voting procedures must comply with § 611.340. You must have an independent third party count the ballots. If a voting stockholder notifies you of the stockholder's intent to exercise dissenters' rights, the tabulator must be able to verify to you that the stockholder voted against the termination. Otherwise, the votes of stockholders must remain confidential.
( f ) *Notice to FCA and equity holders of voting results.* Within 10 days of the termination vote, you must send us a certified record of the results of the vote. You must notify all equity holders of the results within 30 days after the stockholder meeting. If the stockholders approve the termination, you must give the following information to equity holders: ( 1 ) Stockholders who voted against termination and equity holders who were not entitled to vote have a right to dissent as provided in § 611.1280; and
( 2 ) Voting stockholders have a right, under § 611.1245, to file a petition with the FCA for reconsideration within 35 days after the date you mail to them the notice of the results of the termination vote.
( g ) *Requirement to notify new equity holders.* You must provide the information described in paragraph (f)(1) of this section to each person that becomes an equity holder after the termination vote and before termination.
[71 FR 44420, Aug. 4, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 18743, Apr. 12, 2010]
§ 357.1 Economically depressed regions. ( a ) *Purpose.* Section 13(k)(5) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1823(k)(5)) provides that the FDIC shall consider proposals for financial assistance for eligible insured savings associations before grounds exist for appointment of a conservator or receiver for such member. One of the criteria for eligibility is that an institution's offices are located in an economically depressed region as determined by the FDIC.
( b ) *Economically depressed regions.* ( 1 ) For the purpose of determining “economically depressed regions”, the FDIC will determine whether an institution qualifies as being located in an “economically depressed region” on a case-by-case basis. That determination will be based on four criteria: ( i ) High unemployment rates;
( ii ) Significant declines in non-farm employment;
( iii ) High delinquency rates of real estate assets at insured depository institutions; and
( iv ) Evidence indicating declining real estate values.
( 2 ) In addition, the FDIC will also consider relevant information from institutions regarding their geographic market area, as well as information on whether that market is “economically depressed”.
[55 FR 11161, Mar. 27, 1990, as amended at 63 FR 10295, Mar. 3, 1998; 71 FR 20527, Apr. 21, 2006]
CITY COURT OF NEW YORK, GENERAL TERM,

DECEMBER, 1900.

#### Philip Mohr, Respondent, *v.*Kate A. Wetherill et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order denying the defendants’ motion for a new trial, made on the minutes.

John S. Sheppard, Jr., guardian *ad litem,*for infant appellants.

Evarts, Choate & Beaman (Treadwell Cleveland and John S. S-heppard, Jr., of counsel), for Kate A. Wetherill, appellant.

Frank Herwig, for respondent.

Schuchman, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries occasioned to the plaintiff by reason of the defendants’ negligence. The plaintiff alleges that, while he was lawfully upon .a five-story flathouse owned by the defendants, in the act of delivering coal to a tenant and hoisting the coal on the dumb-waiter to the top floor, the dumb-waiter, on account of the rotten condition of the top board to which the center rope was attached and the frayed and worn-out condition of the rope, fell and injured his wrist and arm.

There is evidence that the janitor or caretaker of the defendants’ premises was notified of the defective condition of the dumbwaiter about two months before the accident occurred; that the ■defects existed for about two months, and that the exercise of •ordinary care or inspection would have revealed the defects. There is a sharp conflict in the evidence in regard to the rottenness of the top board of the dumb-waiter — not so much in regard to the *792frayed or wom-out condition of the rope, however. There is no doubt whatever that the rope did break, that the dumb-waiter did fall and that the plaintiff was struck by it on his wrist, and was injured. There was sufficient evidence of the defendants’ negligence to be submitted to the jury.

In regard to plaintiff’s contributory negligence, the evidence is of such a nature that different minds might draw different inferences, and we think that that question was properly left to the jury. The evidence shows that the plaintiff’s wrist was injured and the bones fractured; that the bones stick out at the wrist; the fingers are cramped up and the hand crippled; that a physician put the hand in plaster-of-paris for two weeks, and in a second plaster-of-paris for three weeks; that the plaintiff carried his hand in a sling for two months; that his hand was not as strong after the accident as before; that he cannot lift anything with the injured hand except a small stick, and that he suffered pain. Considering this evidence, we cannot assert that a verdict of $1,250 is excessive.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

McCarthy and O’Dwyer, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 23.2


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  33-79022)  pertaining  to the 1993  Incentive and  Non-Qualified  Stock
Option Plan of Human  Genome  Sciences,  Inc. of our report  dated  February 23,
1998, with respect to the financial  statements of Human Genome  Sciences,  Inc.
included in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Vienna, Virginia
March 27, 1998
#### § 5.65 Restrictions on undercapitalized institutions.

Notwithstanding any other provision in this subpart, a national bank may not declare or pay any dividend if, after making the dividend, the national bank would be “undercapitalized” as defined in 12 CFR part 6.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS853 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          489421
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                521146
<PP&E>                                         4668436
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1334935
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3854647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           612712
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3241935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3854647
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                361445
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                367372
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               19632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (25559)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 608.821 Collection by offset. ( a ) Collection of a debt by administrative [or salary] offset shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of these regulations, of 4 CFR 102.3, and 5 CFR part 550, subpart K. It is not necessary for the debt to be reduced to judgment or to be undisputed for offset to be used.
( b ) The Chairman, or designee of the Chairman, may determine that it is feasible to collect a debt to the United States by offset against funds payable to the debtor.
( c ) The feasibility of collecting a debt by offset will be determined on a case-by-case basis. This determination shall be made by considering all relevant factors, including the following: ( 1 ) The degree to which the offset can be accomplished in accordance with law. This determination should take into consideration relevant statutory, regulatory, and contractual requirements;
( 2 ) The degree to which the FCA is certain that its determination of the existence and amount of the debt is correct;
( 3 ) The practicality of collecting the debt by offset. The cost, in time and money, of collecting the debt by offset and the amount of money which can reasonably be expected to be recovered through offset will be relevant to this determination; and
( 4 ) Whether the use of offset will substantially interfere with or defeat the purpose of a program authorizing payments against which the offset is contemplated. For example, under a grant program in which payments are made in advance of the grantee's performance, the imposition of offset against such a payment may be inappropriate.
( d ) The collection of a debt by offset may not be feasible when there are circumstances which would indicate that the likelihood of collection by offset is less than probable.
( e ) The offset will be effected 31 days after the debtor receives a Notice of Intent to Collect by Administrative Offset (or Notice of Intent to Collect by Salary Offset if the offset is a salary offset), or upon the expiration of a stay of offset, unless the FCA determines under § 608.824 that immediate action is necessary.
( f ) If the debtor owes more than one debt, amounts recovered through offset may be applied to them in any order. Applicable statutes of limitation would be considered before applying the amounts recovered to any debts owed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LELLY C. ALFONSO
, Appellant,

v.

RICHARD J. LANG
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2023

- 1744

[March 13, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Daniel Casey , Judge; L.T. Case No. 20

- 019720 CACE

.

James G. Bishop, Lakeland, for appellant.

Carlos J. Reyes , Jr. of Gray Robinson, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Kristie

Hatcher

- Bolin of Gray Robinson, P.A., Lakeland, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

This appea l arises out of the appellant’s attempt to set aside a foreclosure judgment. After this court dismissed the appellant’s appeal of the foreclosure judgment based on the notice of appeal not being timely filed, the appellant moved for relief from judgment a nd/or rehearing, requesting that the trial court vacate the judgment and dismiss the foreclosure based on the appellee’s purported submission of fraudulent

evidence , or, in the alternative, grant rehearing . The appellant appeals

from the order denying his motion

.

We find no merit to the appellant’s argument that the trial court erred in denying his motion for relief from judgment , and we affirm on that issue. Further, we dismiss the appeal of the portion of the order denying rehearing of the foreclosure judgment

. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(4) (providing that “[o]rders disposing of motions for rehearing . . . are not reviewable separately from a review of the final order”)

.

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part.

D AMOORGIAN

, C IKLIN and G ERBER
, JJ., concur.2 * * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Meeting to Discuss Ash Grove Cement, Durkee OR Proposed Portland Cement NESHAP September 30, 2009 Meeting Date: September 30, 2009. Purpose: This was a meeting between USEPA staff and Congressional Staff for the Oregon Congressional Delegation to discus s the Ash Grove Cement plant in Durkee OR Participants: Congressional Staff Dave Berick, Mary

Gautreaux (Sen Wyden) Jeremiah Baumann (Sen Merkley) Ethan Pittleman, Alison Craig (Congressman Kurt Schrader

- 5th District of OR)
USEPA Keith Barnett Peter Tsirigotis The purpose of the meeting was for EPA to hear the questions from the staff of the Oregon Congressional delegation about the Ash Grove Cement facility . This facility had commented that they

could not meet the proposed mercury limit and the Ore gon delegation wanted to discuss the issues concerning the mercury limit.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Independence Day

# 									Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Independence Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

October 27, 2021

On behalf of the government of the United States of America and the American people, I congratulate the people of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines on the 42nd anniversary of your independence.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines demonstrated its strength and resilience in the face of a global pandemic and volcanic eruption. The United States stood with you to combat COVID-19, safely evacuate, house, and support Vincentians affected by the volcano eruption, and work toward the region’s economic recovery.Our provision of 35,100 COVID-19 vaccine doses and the more than $4 million committed in humanitarian relief by the United States testify to the strong relationship and close ties between our two countries.Our work with young people on juvenile justice and entrepreneurship reminds us that there is more to be done together to ensure the future security and prosperity of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

I’m proud of our cooperation and look forward to our continued partnership. I wish a happy Independence Day to the people of Saint Vincent and Grenadines.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
# C_2008118EN.01003001.xml

| 15.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/30

---

EFTA Surveillance Authority notice on current State aid recovery interest rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 January 2008

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (OJ L 139 of 25.5.2006, p. 37 and in the EEA Supplement No 26/2006, 25 May 2006, p. 1))

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (OJ L 139 of 25.5.2006, p. 37 and in the EEA Supplement No 26/2006, 25 May 2006, p. 1))

(2008/C 118/12)

Recovery interest rates for Iceland: 11,01.

Recovery interest rates for Liechtenstein: 3,82.

Recovery interest rates for Norway: 6,25.

Correction of recovery interest rates for Iceland applicable as from 1 January 2007 (published in the OJ C 126 of 7.6.2007, p. 20 and in the EEA Supplement No 27/2007, 7 June 2007, p. 3):

Iceland

should read ‘9,84’ and not ‘8,23’.

---
IB 

Union Calendar No. 236

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3095

[Report No. 108–411] 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to make sure the rules of etiquette 

for flying the flag of the United States do not preclude the flying 

of flags at half mast when ordered by city and local officials. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2003

Mr. DOOLITTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

FEBRUARY 3, 2004 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL

To amend title 4, United States Code, to make sure the 

rules of etiquette for flying the flag of the United States 

do not preclude the flying of flags at half mast when 

ordered by city and local officials.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3095 RH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Recogni3 tion Act of 2003’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FLAG CODE AMENDMENT. 

5 Section 7(m) of title 4, United States Code, is amend6 ed by inserting after the sentence beginning ‘‘In the event 

7 of the death of a present or former official of the govern8 ment of any State’’ the following: ‘‘In the event of the 

9 death of a present or former official of any city or other 

10 locality, the chief elected official of that locality may pro11 claim that the National flag shall be flown at half staff.’’.

12 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

13 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Recognition 

14 Act of 2004’’. 

15 SEC. 2. FLAG CODE AMENDMENT. 

16 Section 7(m) of title 4, United States Code, is amended 

17 by inserting after the sentence beginning ‘‘In the event of 

18 the death of a present or former official of the government 

19 of any State’’ the following: ‘‘In the event of the death of 

20 a present or former official of any city or other locality, 

21 the chief elected official of that locality may proclaim that 

22 the National flag shall be flown at half staff.’’. 

Union Calendar No. 236

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3095

[Report No. 108–411] 

A BILL

To amend title 4, United States Code, to make sure 

the rules of etiquette for flying the flag of the United States do not preclude the flying of flags at half mast when ordered by city and local officials. 

FEBRUARY 3, 2004

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 

and ordered to be printed
§ 608.839 Procedures for salary offset. ( a ) The Chairman, or designee of the Chairman, shall determine the amount of an employee's disposable pay and the amount to be deducted from the employee's disposable pay at regular pay intervals.
( b ) Deductions shall begin within three official pay periods following the date of mailing or delivery of the Notice of Intent to Collect by Salary Offset.
( c ) ( 1 ) If the amount of the debt is equal to or is less than 15 percent of the employee's disposable pay, such debt should be collected in one lump-sum deduction.
( 2 ) If the amount of the debt is not collected in one lump-sum deduction, the debt shall be collected in installment deductions over a period of time not greater than the anticipated period of employment. The size and frequency of installment deductions will bear a reasonable relation to the size of the debt and the employee's ability to pay. However, the amount deducted from any pay period will not exceed 15 percent of the employee's disposable pay for that period, unless the employee has agreed in writing to the deduction of a greater amount.
( 3 ) A deduction exceeding the 15-percent disposable pay limitation may be made from any final salary payment pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3716 in order to liquidate the debt, whether the employee is being separated voluntarily or involuntarily.
( 4 ) Whenever an employee subject to salary offset is separated from the FCA and the balance of the debt cannot be liquidated by offset of the final salary check pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3716, the FCA may offset any later payments of any kind against the balance of the debt.
( d ) In instances where two or more creditor agencies are seeking salary offsets against current employees of the FCA or where two or more debts are owed to a single creditor agency, the FCA, at its discretion, may determine whether one or more debts should be offset simultaneously within the 15-percent limitation. Debts owed to the FCA should generally take precedence over debts owed to other agencies.