alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT E 

Summary of Jenner & Block LLP Hours Worked and Fees Incurred 

Name of 

Professional 

Title Year 

Admitted 

Department Hourly 

Billing 

Rate 

(2022) 

Total 

Billed 

Hours 

Total Fees 

Requested 

ROBERT D. 

GORDON 

Partner 1989 Restructuring & 

Bankruptcy

$1,450 39.30 $56,985.00 

MELISSA M. 

ROOT 

Partner 2003 Restructuring & 

Bankruptcy

$1,150 3.60 $4,140.00 

CATHERINE L. 

STEEGE 

Partner 1982 Restructuring & 

Bankruptcy

$1,450 .50 $725.00 

CARL N. 

WEDOFF 

Special 

Counsel

2010 Restructuring & 

Bankruptcy

$995 75.70 $75,321.50 

SHIVA 

KHANSARI

Paralegal N/A Litigation $430 16.10 $6,923.00 

JESSICA M. 

MERKOURIS

Paralegal N/A Litigation $505 9.50 $4,797.50 

Sub-Total* 144.70 $148,892.00 

Less 15% Fee 

Discount on all 

matters except the 

Non-working 

Travel Matter

($22,333.80) 

Less 50% 

Discount on Nonworking Travel 

Matter

$0.00 

Total 144.70 $126,558.20 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22892-5 Filed:11/18/22 Entered:11/18/22 18:44:13 Desc:

Exhibit E Page 1 of 1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPressure distributions from high Reynolds number tests of a Boeing BAC 1 airfoil in the Langley 0.3-meter transonic cryogenic tunnelA wind-tunnel investigation designed to test a Boeing advanced-technology airfoil from low to flight-equivalent Reynolds numbers has been completed in the Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel. This investigation represents the first in a series of NASA/U.S. industry two-dimensional airfoil studies to be completed in the Advanced Technology Airfoil Test program. Test temperature was varied from ambient to about 100 K at pressures ranging from about 1.2 to 6.0 atm. Mach number was varied from about 0.40 to 0.80. These variables provided a Reynolds number (based on airfoil chord) range from 4.4 X 10 to the 6th power to 50.0 X 10 to the 6th power. All the test objectives were met. The pressure data are presented without analysis in plotted and tabulated formats for use in conjunction with the aerodynamic coefficient data published as NASA TM-81922. At the time of the test, these pressure data were considered proprietary and have only recently been made available by Boeing for general release. Data are included which demonstrate the effects of fixed transition. Also included are remarks on the model design, the model structural integrity, and the overall test experience.Document ID19860006729Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsJohnson, W. G., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Hill, A. S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1985Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:87600L-16010NASA-TM-87600Accession Number86N16199Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-31-53-10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860006729.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.1

                        ALDILA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  Twelve months ended
                                                                                      December 31,
                                                                   ---------------------------------------------------
                                                                        1998              1997              1996
                                                                   ---------------   ---------------    --------------
<S>                                                                 <C>               <C>                <C>
BASIC:

Net income                                                           $      2,799      $      1,539       $     5,682

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                       15,452            15,625            16,411
                                                                   ---------------   ---------------    --------------

Net income  per common share                                         $       0.18      $       0.10       $      0.35
                                                                   ---------------   ---------------    --------------
                                                                   ---------------   ---------------    --------------


ASSUMING DILUTION:

Net income                                                           $      2,799      $      1,539       $     5,682

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                       15,452            15,625            16,411

The number of shares resulting from the assumed exercise 
of stock options reduced by the number of shares which 
could have been purchased with the proceeds from such 
exercise, using the average market price during the period                     67               113                23
                                                                   ---------------   ---------------    --------------

Weighted average number of common and
   common equivalent shares                                                15,519            15,738            16,434
                                                                   ---------------   ---------------    --------------

Net income per common share, assuming dilution                       $       0.18      $       0.10       $      0.35
                                                                   ---------------   ---------------    --------------
                                                                   ---------------   ---------------    --------------
</TABLE>
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Pippin, Sheri (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 7:28 PM

To: Schramek, Chuck

Subject: Docket FAA 2016-4676 Use Outside U.S.

Mr. Schramek,

In accordance with Title 14 CFR § 11.81(h), if Delta Air Lines wants to exercise the privileges of an exemption, if granted,

outside the United States, “the reason why you need to do so” must be included in the petition for exemption.

Otherwise, in accordance with § 11.83, the FAA will limit the exemption, if granted, to use within the United States.

The Delta Air Lines petition for exemption from Title 14 CFR §§ 121.438 and 121.652, dated February 29, 2016, did not

specifically request use of the petition outside of the United States. However, the FAA is aware that Delta Air Lines

conducts international operations with the Boeing 767. Therefore, the FAA requests clarification on whether Delta Air

Lines wants to exercise the privileges of this exemption, if granted, outside the United States.

Please submit the clarification directly to the docket ID FAA

‐ 2016

‐ 4676. If Delta Air Lines wants to exercise the privileges

of this exemption, if granted, outside the United States, please also include the information required by § 11.81(h).

Thanks,

Sheri Pippin

Air Transportation Division

Air Carrier Training Systems and Voluntary Safety Programs Branch, AFS

‐ 280

800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591

(310) 725

‐ 7342

Remote Sited Address: Los Angeles IFO, 15000 Aviation Blvd. Lawndale, CA 90261

This message is intended solely for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is

privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this communication in

error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email. Thank you
§ 349.24 Authorization to trade. ( a ) *Specific authorization required.* No FDIC-supervised insured depository institution may directly or indirectly effect a retail forex transaction for the account of any retail forex customer unless, before the transaction occurs, the retail forex customer specifically authorized the FDIC-supervised insured depository institution to effect the retail forex transaction.
( b ) Requirements for specific authorization. A retail forex transaction is “specifically authorized” for purposes of this section if the retail forex customer specifies: ( 1 ) The precise retail forex transaction to be effected;
( 2 ) The exact amount of the foreign currency to be purchased or sold; and
( 3 ) In the case of an option, the identity of the foreign currency or contract that underlies the option.
[76 FR 40789, July 12, 2011. Redesignated at 80 FR 74912, Nov. 30, 2015]
#### SMITH V. THE STATE.

(Decided May 15, 1913.)

Appeal from Autauga Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson.

Hill, Hill & Whiting, for appellant. R. C. Brickell,. Atotrney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for tlie State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 604.425 Announcement of meetings. ( a ) The Board meets in the offices of the Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, on the second Thursday of each month, unless the Board fixes a different time and/or place for a meeting and follows the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) The Farm Credit Administration shall make available for public inspection the time, place, and subject matter of the meeting, and whether it is to be open or closed, by posting notice on its public notice board or on its public Web site except to the extent that such information is exempt from disclosure under the provisions of § 604.420 of this part. The public announcement must be made at least 1 week before the meeting, unless a majority of the FCA Board determines by a recorded vote that agency business requires that a meeting be called on lesser notice, in which case the announcement shall be made at the earliest practicable time.
( 2 ) Once a meeting has been announced, the time, place, and subject matter of the meeting and whether it is open or closed to the public may be changed following the requirements of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.
[74 FR 44727, Aug. 31, 2009, as amended at 85 FR 6422, Feb. 5, 2020]
STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OFFICE OF THE

SECERTARY 89 KINGS HIGHWAY DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 PHONE: (302) 739-4403 FAX: (302) 739- 6242

Mr. Donald S. Welsh (3RAOO) Regional Administrator U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 Dear Mr. Welsh: June 13, 2007 

# RECEIVED JUN 1 5 

## 2001

## Div;~ion 

# Director (3APOI)

I am pleased to submit the enclosed revisions to the State ofDelaware State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Attainment and Maintenance ofthe National AmbientAir Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Ozone. The revisions are: 1) Delaware State Implementation Plan for Attainment and Maintenance ofthe 8-hour Ozone National AmbientAir Quality Standard

- Reasonable Further Progress and AttainmentDemonstration; 2) 2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Carbon Monoxide. The effective date ofthe revisions is June 13,2007. 

# ...

These revisions demonstrate that 1) Delaware has fulfilled the CAA requirements for Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) and Attainment Demonstration (AD) under the 8-hour ozone NAAQS; 2) that with all existing and proposed controls, Delaware will meet VOC and NOx emission reduction RFP requirements in 2008, and VOC and NOx emission reduction AD requirements in 2009; and, 3) thatthe entire Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City nonattainment area will attain the 8-hour ozone standard in 2009. The requirements ofthe CAA Section 110(a)(2)(A) have been met through the normal public hearing process establishedby the State ofDelaware withproper notification (30 days) priorto the convening ofthe public hearing. A public hearing was held on May 24,2007. Attachments A and B are copies ofaffidavits as proofofpropernotification. Itis the position of the State ofDelaware that all minimum requirements set forth in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments have been met.

### Mr. Donald S. Welsh June 13, 2007 Page 2

We look forward to continuingthe cooperative effort betweenDelaware and EPA inthis important work. As always, feel free to contact me or Ali Mirzakhalili, Administrator, (302) 739-9402, ifyou have any questions concerningthe enclosed documents.

Enclosures
cc: Judy Katz, EPA w/encl. James Werner, Director, DAWM Ali Mirzakhalili .'

# (jJ!:Ae~y,

# ri Jf / John A.

# HIJ{;!:: ./

, Secretary
§ 380.34 Procedures for filing claim. ( a ) *In general.* The Corporation as receiver shall provide, in a reasonably practicable manner, instructions for filing a claim, including by the following means: ( 1 ) Providing contact information in the publication notice;
( 2 ) Including in the mailed notice a proof of claim form that has filing instructions; or
( 3 ) Posting filing instructions on the Corporation's public Web site at *www.fdic.gov .*
( b ) *When claim is deemed filed.* A claim that is mailed to the receiver in accordance with the instructions established under paragraph (a) of this section shall be deemed to be filed as of the date of postmark. A claim that is sent to the receiver by electronic media or fax in accordance with the instructions established under paragraph (a) shall be deemed to be filed as of the date of transmission by the claimant.
( c ) *Class claimants.* If a claimant is a member of a class for purposes of a class action lawsuit, whether or not the class has been certified by a court, each claimant must file its claim with the Corporation as receiver separately.
( d ) *Indenture trustee.* A trustee appointed under an indenture or other applicable trust document related to investments or other financial activities may file a claim on behalf of the persons who appointed the trustee.
( e ) *Legal effect of filing.* ( 1 ) Pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 5390(a)(3)(E)(i), the filing of a claim with the receiver shall constitute a commencement of an action for purposes of any applicable statute of limitations.
( 2 ) *No prejudice to continuation of action.* Pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 5390(a)(3)(E)(ii) and subject to 12 U.S.C. 5390(a)(8), the filing of a claim with the receiver shall not prejudice any right of the claimant to continue, after the receiver's determination of the claim, any action which was filed before the date of appointment of the receiver for the covered financial company.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Program Project in Cardiovascular Disease.                     

*Date:*                         February 27, 2009.                     

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                     

*Contact Person:*                        Holly K. Krull, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch/                              ( print page 6170)                            DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7188, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0280,                         *krullh@nhlbi.nih.gov*.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and   Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 30, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-2494 Filed 2-4-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 10.3


            AMENDMENT #1 TO DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
                                       FOR
                                 EMIL C. HERKERT



This amendment, dated April 27, 1990 establishes the appreciation of the
Deferred Compensation Plan contributions from the beginning of the Plan and
continuing into the future in the absence of the investment of the funds.

The funds established and contributed to by the company in yearly amounts will
be deemed to have appreciated at a rate equal to the prime rate of interest as
determined in the Wall Street Journal for the first business day of each month,
which amount shall be compounded on a monthly basis from its inception in
September 1986 and continue as long as the funds have not otherwise been
invested.

      Agreed to this 27th day of April, 1990.




      Frank Piedelievre                   Emil C. Herkert


      /s/ Frank Piedelievre                    /s/ Emil C. Herkert
#### Stasio Morowski *vs.*The Malleable Iron Fittings Company et al.

Maltbie, C. J., Haines, Hinman, Banks and Avery, Js.

Argued October 4th

—decided November 8th, 1934.

*Samuel M. Silver,*with whom, on the brief, were *David M. Rickman*and *Albert W. Ginsberg,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Harold K. Watrous,*with whom, on the brief, was *Daniel G. Campion,*for the appellees (defendants).

Per Curiam.

The claim of the plaintiff in this case before the compensation commissioner was that the decedent received in the course of his employment a blow in the posterial region of the ninth and tenth ribs, and that his death from broncho-pneumonia was proximately caused by this blow. The commissioner refused to find that either of these facts was proven. Even if the plaintiff is entitled to have the finding corrected so as to state that such a blow as that claimed was received by the decedent, whether it proximately *695caused the pneumonia from which he died was an issue upon which the medical testimony was in decided conflict. The question was, therefore, one of fact for the commissioner to decide and the trial court was correct in dismissing the appeal. *Tippman*v. *State,*119 Conn. 1, 4, 174 Atl. 296.

There is no error.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alliance Financial Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Daniel Mohr, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 9, 2008



/s/ J. Daniel MohrName:

J. Daniel MohrTitle:

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer




31
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
      knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of ANTs software
      inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter ended September
      30, 2006:





1.  Fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




This
      certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be
      deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any
      purpose whatsoever.





Date: November
      14, 2006





By:   /s/
      Joe
      Kozak


Joseph
      Kozak, Chief Executive Officer and President





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the
      Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
      request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 
**- 1**  **575**

KATHERINE F. THOMAS ,

P laintiff

- Appell ant ,

v.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ,
Defendant

- Appell ee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the We stern District of Virginia , at Harrisonburg

. Michael F. Urbanski , District Judge. ( 5:12

- cv
- 00064

- MFU

- BWC )

Submitted : August 29, 2013 Decided: September 3, 2013

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Katherine F. Thomas , Appellant Pro Se. Allyson Sinclair Jozwik, Andrea A. Robertson, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Katherine F. Thomas appeals the district court ’ s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing as untimely filed her complaint against the Social
Security Administration . We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error . Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Thomas v. Soc. Sec. Admin. , No.

5:12

- cv
- 00064

- MFU

- BWC (W.D. Va. Apr. 9, 2013) . We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before th is court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED