alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.6

                                                      BOOK 230 PAGE 4

                 CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION OF LODE MINING CLAIM

      The undersigned hereby certifies that he has caused to be located the TC
#37 Lode Mining Claim in the following described legal subdivision(s):

NE    1/4 , Section       10  Township 15N,     Range 64E,        MDB7M
                          ---
SE    1/4 , Section       10  Township 15N      Range  64E        MDB&M
                          ---
      1/4 , Section       ___ Township          Range             MDB&M
      1/4 , Section       ___ Township          Range             MDB&M

In White Pine County, Nevada, on the 15th day of September, 1994.

      The name and address of the locator is:

                               Brancoto U.S. Inc.
                               127 Cheney Street
                               Reno, Nevada 89511
                              (702) 853-7015

The claim is approximately 1500 feet long and 600 feet wide, such that 25 feet
in a Northerly direction and 1475 feet in a southerly direction from the
location monument (point of discovery), at which the Notice of Location was
posted, together with 300 feet on each side of the location monument.

      The general course of the lode or vein is from the Northwest to the
Southeast direction.

      The number, location and markings on each corner monument are as follows:

            Number 1 Northwest corner is a 2"x2"xz4' wooden post
            Number 2 Northeast corner is a 2"x2"xz4' wooden post
            Number 3 Southeast corner is a 2"x2"xz4' wooden post
            Number 4. Southwest corner is a 2"x2"xz4' wooden post

      As erected on the ground, each corner monument is marked by the claim
name, number and which corner it is with an aluminum tag attached to the post.
Monumentation of this claim was completed by the 15th day of October, 1994.

      This claim is intended to cover all land open to location existing within
its boundaries as of this date, but does not in any way affect the rights of
private mineral owners.

      The work of location consisted of making a claim map as provided in NRS
517.040.

      Dated this 24th day of October, 1994.

      SIGNATURE OF LOCATOR                      RECORDERS STAMP
                                                FEE $9.50 FILE #288308
      By: /s/ Herb Duerr                            FILED FOR RECORD
         ---------------------------                AT THE REQUEST OF
         Agent for Brancoto U.S. Inc.               JOHN PROCHNAU
                                                    '94 NOV 28 P2:43

                                                RECORDED IN BOOOK 230 PAGES 4
                                                WHITE PINE COUNTY RECORDER
§ 373.3 Base risk retention requirement. ( a ) *Base risk retention requirement.* Except as otherwise provided in this part, the sponsor of a securitization transaction (or majority-owned affiliate of the sponsor) shall retain an economic interest in the credit risk of the securitized assets in accordance with any one of §§ 373.4 through 373.10. Credit risk in securitized assets required to be retained and held by any person for purposes of compliance with this part, whether a sponsor, an originator, an originator-seller, or a third-party purchaser, except as otherwise provided in this part, may be acquired and held by any of such person's majority-owned affiliates (other than an issuing entity).
( b ) *Multiple sponsors.* If there is more than one sponsor of a securitization transaction, it shall be the responsibility of each sponsor to ensure that at least one of the sponsors of the securitization transaction (or at least one of their majority-owned or wholly-owned affiliates, as applicable) retains an economic interest in the credit risk of the securitized assets in accordance with any one of §§ 373.4, 373.5, 373.8, 373.9, or 373.10.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19885-1 Filed:01/21/22 Entered:01/25/22 14:53:03 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 1
§ 47.8 Exclusion of certain QFCs. ( a ) *Exclusion of QFCs with FMUs.* Notwithstanding § 47.3, a covered bank is not required to conform to the requirements of this part a covered QFC to which: ( 1 ) A CCP is party; or
( 2 ) Each party (other than the covered bank) is an FMU.
( b ) *Exclusion of certain covered entity and covered FSI QFCs.* If a covered QFC is also a covered QFC under part 382 or 252, subpart I, of this title that an affiliate of the covered bank is also required to conform pursuant to part 382 or 252, subpart I, of this title and the covered bank is: ( 1 ) The affiliate credit enhancement provider with respect to the covered QFC, then the covered bank is required to conform the credit enhancement to the requirements of this part but is not required to conform the direct QFC to the requirements of this part; or
( 2 ) The direct party to which the excluded bank is the affiliate credit enhancement provider, then the covered bank is required to conform the direct QFC to the requirements of this part but is not required to conform the credit enhancement to the requirements of this part.
( c ) *Exclusion of certain contracts.* Notwithstanding § 47.3, a covered bank is not required to conform the following types of contracts or agreements to the requirements of this part: ( 1 ) An investment advisory contract that: ( i ) Is with a retail customer or counterparty;
( ii ) Does not explicitly restrict the transfer of the contract (or any QFC entered into pursuant thereto or governed thereby, or any interest or obligation in or under, or any property securing, any such QFC or the contract) from the covered bank except as necessary to comply with section 205(a)(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-5(a)(2)); and
( iii ) Does not explicitly provide a default right with respect to the contract or any QFC entered pursuant thereto or governed thereby.
( 2 ) A warrant that: ( i ) Evidences a right to subscribe to or otherwise acquire a security of the covered bank or an affiliate of the covered bank; and
( ii ) Was issued prior to January 1, 2018.
( d ) *Exemption by order.* The OCC may exempt by order one or more covered banks from conforming one or more contracts or types of contracts to one or more of the requirements of this part after considering: ( 1 ) The potential impact of the exemption on the ability of the covered bank, or affiliates of the covered bank, to be resolved in a rapid and orderly manner in the event of the financial distress or failure of the entity that is required to submit a resolution plan;
( 2 ) The burden the exemption would relieve; and
( 3 ) Any other factor the OCC deems relevant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMOLASE
CORPORATION'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          87,843
<SECURITIES>                                    12,493
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,265
<ALLOWANCES>                                       402
<INVENTORY>                                      3,248
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,852
<PP&E>                                          45,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,055
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 174,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,383
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           408
<OTHER-SE>                                        (75)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   174,595
<SALES>                                         24,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,233
<CGS>                                           16,499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,704
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    83
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,797)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,392)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,405)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,405)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of E.F., a child, * From the 326th District Court

 of Taylor County

Trial Court No. 8444-CX.

No. 11-18-00199-CV * February 14, 2019

 * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10.38

AMENDMENT #1

Hybrid Networks, Inc. and Sprint/United Management Company
Equipment and Services Agreement

This is an Amendment ("Amendment") to the Equipment and Services Agreement ("Agreement") dated May 1, 2000, between Sprint/United Management Company
("Sprint"), a Kansas corporation, with offices at 2330 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Westwood, Kansas 66205 and Hybrid Networks, Inc. ("Hybrid"), a Delaware corporation, with its principal offices
at 6409 Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose, CA 95120.

This
Amendment shall be effective (the "Effective Date") as of December 22, 2000.

In
order to facilitate the Parties working relationship, Sprint and Hybrid have agreed to certain modifications in the Agreement as follows:



Launched Markets:1. Tucson

P.O. #12818642. Colorado Springs

P.O. #13247203. Detroit

P.O. #14429414. San Jose

P.O. #13543845. San Francisco

P.O. #13247236. Kansas City (lab system)

P.O. #1404175Launched or To Be Launched Markets:1. Houston

P.O. #14126522. Denver

P.O. #14217153. Salt Lake City

P.O. #14644784. Wichita

P.O. #14470135. Melbourne

P.O. #15512226. Oklahoma City

P.O. #15512267. Fresno

P.O. #15512198. Chicago

P.O. #14740219. Chicago

P.O. #1551229


1

---



Unlaunched Markets:1. Omaha

P.O. #14673072. Spokane

P.O. #14737153. Cincinnati

P.O. #15512114. Ft. Pierce

P.O. #15073365. Greeley

P.O. #15515566. Seattle

P.O. #14427037. South Bend

P.O. #1473714


And,



Purchase Order 21-0001717968

Any Equipment except from deleted lines 1,2,3,6,7Purchase Order 21-0001715685

Any Equipment except from deleted lines 2,3,4,6,7Purchase Order 21-0001738557

Any Equipment except from deleted lines 3,4,5,6,7




Purchase Order 21-0001717968

Delete Lines 1,2,3,6,7Purchase Order 21-0001715685

Delete Lines 2,3,4,6,7Purchase Order 21-0001738557

Delete Lines 3,4,5,6,7


2

---

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each party has executed this Amendment by a duly authorized representative. The parties acknowledge that they have read, understood and agreed to the terms of this
Amendment.

|SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY                   |  | HYBRID NETWORKS, INC.           
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|By:                                                |  |                                 
|Name: Kevin L. Neuer                               |  | Name: Judson W. Goldsmith       
|Title: Director, Network Architecture & Technology |  | Title: Vice President of Finance

|Dated: |  | Dated:
|------ |  | ------

3

---
#### § 3.604 Decision.

After the closing date of the national bank's or Federal savings association's response period, or receipt of the national bank's or Federal savings association's response, if earlier, the OCC will consider the national bank's or Federal savings association's response, and may seek additional information or clarification of the response. Thereafter, the OCC will determine whether or not to issue a directive, and if one is to be issued, whether it should be as originally proposed or in modified form.
§ 615.5172 Production credit association and agricultural credit association investment in farmers' notes given to cooperatives and dealers. ( a ) In accordance with policies prescribed by the board of directors of the Farm Credit Bank or agricultural credit bank and each production credit association and agricultural credit association (hereinafter association(s)), such association(s) may invest in notes, conditional sales contracts, and other similar obligations given to cooperatives and private dealers by farmers and ranchers eligible to borrow from such associations.
( b ) Such notes and other obligations evidencing purchases of farm machinery, supplies, equipment, home appliances, and other items of a capital nature handled by cooperatives and private dealers will be eligible for purchase as investments.
( c ) The total amount which an association may invest in such obligations at any one time shall not exceed 15 percent of the balance of its loans outstanding at the close of the association's preceding fiscal year. In addition, the total amount which an association may invest in such obligations that are originated by any one cooperative or private dealer, at any one time, shall not exceed 50 percent of association capital and surplus.
( d ) All notes in which an association invests shall be endorsed with full recourse against the cooperative or dealer. The association shall contact each notemaker who meets the association's credit standards to encourage him to become a borrower.
[54 FR 1158, Jan. 12, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 24888, June 19, 1990; 55 FR 38313, Sept. 18, 1990. Redesignated at 58 FR 63056, Nov. 30, 1993]
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–602

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2957, THE

LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN BASIN RESTORATION ACT

MAY 2, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 484]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 484, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 2957, the

Lake Pontchartrain Basin Restoration Act, under an open rule. The

rule provides one hour of general debate divided equally between

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Transportation and Infrastructure.

The rule waives clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring a three day

layover of the committee report) against consideration of the bill.

This waiver is necessary because the report was filed on Tuesday,

May 2, and the bill may be considered as early as May 3. The rule

makes in order the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure amendment in the nature of a substitute, now printed in the

bill, as an original bill for the purpose of amendment, which shall

be open for amendment at any point.

Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record prior to their consideration will be given priority in

recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise consistent with

House rules. The rule allows the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole to postpone votes during consideration of the bill and to reduce voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if the vote

2

follows a fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, with or without instructions.

Æ
§ 617.7430 Are institutions required to participate in state agricultural loan mediation programs? ( a ) If initiated by a borrower, System institutions must participate in state mediation programs certified under section 501 of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 and present and explore debt restructuring proposals advanced in the course of such mediation. If provided in the certified program, System institutions may initiate mediation at any time.
( b ) System institutions must cooperate in good faith with requests for information or analysis of information made in the course of mediation under any loan mediation program.
( c ) No System institution may make a loan secured by a mortgage or lien on agricultural property to a borrower on the condition that the borrower waive any right under the agricultural loan mediation program of any state.
( d ) A state mediation may proceed at the same time as the loan restructuring process of § 617.7415 or at any other appropriate time.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
      the


Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002





The
      undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their
      knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine month period ended
      September 30, 2007 of Naturade, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended, and that the information contained in such periodic report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such
      report.




/s/
                Adam MichelinAdam
                Michelin
              *Chief
                Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer*
              November
                14, 2007






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and it will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.
**Exhibit 12(b)**COMPUTATION OF RATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(1)     The following table sets forth Lamar Media’s ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the periods indicted.                               YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, (dollars in thousands) 2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006 Net income (loss) $(97,566) $(24,958) $(22,168) $24,219  $47,470  $45,232 Income tax (benefit) expense  (38,870)  (12,434)  (12,338)  11,764   35,488   35,753 Fixed charges  153,964   139,376   126,245   116,409   137,889   171,686                    Earnings  17,528   101,984   91,739   152,392   220,847   252,671                    Interest expense, net  112,386   94,061   77,350   64,425   80,345   109,806 Rent under leases representativeof an interest factor (1/3)  41,578   45,315   48,895   51,984   57,544   61,880 Preferred dividends  0   0   0   0   0   0                    Fixed charges  153,964   139,376   126,245   116,409   137,889   171,686                    Ratio of earnings to fixedcharges(2)  0.1x   0.7x   0.7x   1.3x   1.6x   1.5x                     (1) The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is defined as earningsdivided by fixed charges. For purposes of this ratio, earnings is defined as netincome (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of achange in accounting principle and fixed charges. Fixed charges is defined as the sum ofinterest expenses, preferred stock dividends and the component of rental expense that we believe to be representative of the interest factor for those amounts. (2) For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $136.4 million, $37.4 million and $34.5 million, respectively.
# Financials

The following financial reports have been filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission as required by the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006.
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epolin, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August  31,  2003,
as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned certifies,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley  Act  of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's  knowledge,
that:

      (1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and

       (2)   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.




Date: October 8, 2003         By: /s/ Murray S. Cohen
                                      Murray S. Cohen,
                                      Chairman of the Board and
                                      Chief Executive Officer



Date: October 8, 2003         By: /s/ James Ivchenko
                                      James Ivchenko,
                                      President (Principal
                                      Financial Officer)
§ 366.14 What information must I provide the FDIC? You must: ( a ) Certify in writing that you can perform services for us under § 366.3 and have no conflict of interest under § 366.10(a).
( b ) Submit a list and description of any instance during the preceding five years in which you, any person that owns or controls you, or any entity you own or control, defaulted on a material obligation to an insured depository institution. A default on a material obligation occurs when a loan or advance with an outstanding balance of more than $50,000 is or was delinquent for 90 days or more.
( c ) Notify us within 10 business days after you become aware that you, or any person you employ to perform services for us, are not in compliance with this part. Your notice must include a detailed description of the facts of the situation and how you intend to resolve the matter.
( d ) Agree in writing that you will employ only persons who meet the requirements of this part to perform services on our behalf.
( e ) Comply with any request from us for information.
( f ) Retain any information you prepare or rely upon regarding the provisions of this part for a period of three years following termination or expiration and final payment of the related contract for services whichever occurs last.