alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.2

                                PrimeCo PCS, L.P.
                          c/o Bell Atlantic Corporation
                          1717 Arch Street, 29th Floor
                        Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

                                  June 16, 2000

Via Facsimile No. 540-956-3595;
Hard Copy to follow via FedEx Overnight Delivery

Mr. Warren Catlett
Virginia RSA 6 Cellular Limited Partnership
c/o CFW Communications Company
401 Spring Lane, Suite 300
Waynesboro, Virginia  22980

         Re:      Asset Exchange Agreement between PrimeCo PCS, L.P. ("PrimeCo
                  PCS") and Virginia RSA 6 Cellular Limited Partnership
                  ("Va-6LP"), dated May 17, 2000 (the "Agreement")

Dear Mr. Catlett:

         In light of the recent approval of the Bell/GTE Merger (as that term is
defined in the  Agreement)  by the  Federal  Communications  Commission,  and in
consideration  of Va-6LP's  undertaking  to attempt to  expedite  the High Yield
Issuance, PrimeCo PCS hereby waives the condition precedent to closing set forth
in Section 5.2.5 of the Agreement.


                                                     Sincerely,

                                                     PRIMECO PCS, L.P.

                                                     s/ Michael J. Polosky
                                                     Title: President/CEO



cc:      David Carter (via facsimile no. 404-888-4190)
         Susan Asch (via facsimile no. 215-963-9195)
         Steve Smith (via facsimile no. 215-557-7249)
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.
**Title:****National Educators� Workshop, update[microform].
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.55:
Item Number:0830-H-10 (MF)
CGP System Number:000523203
 
1988 | 1989
1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003: Pt.1Pt. 2
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
July 11, 2017********
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3288

AN ACT

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to

make technical corrections with respect to thedefinition of qualifying State.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3288

AN ACT

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to make

technical corrections with respect to the definition of

qualifying State.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3288 EH

1 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS RELATING TO THE

2 DEFINITION OF QUALIFYING STATE UNDER

3 TITLE XXI OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.

4 Effective as if included in the enactment of Public

5 Law 108–74, section 2105(g)(2) of the Social Security

6 Act, as added by section 1(b) of such Act, is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘185’’ the first place it appears

8 and inserting ‘‘184’’;

9 (2) by inserting ‘‘August 1, 1994, or’’ before

10 ‘‘July 1, 1995’’; and

11 (3) by inserting before the period at the end the

12 following: ‘‘, or, in the case of a State that had a

13 statewide waiver in effect under section 1115 with

14 respect to title XIX that was first implemented on

15 October 1, 1993, had an income eligibility standard

16 under such waiver for children that was at least 185

17 percent of the poverty line and on and after July 1,

18 1998, has an income eligibility standard for children

19 under section 1902(a)(10)(A) or a statewide waiver

20 in effect under section 1115 with respect to title
3

•HR 3288 EH

1 XIX that is at least 185 percent of the poverty

2 line’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 20,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22362 Filed:09/22/22 Entered:09/23/22 11:35:49 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22362 Filed:09/22/22 Entered:09/23/22 11:35:49 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22362 Filed:09/22/22 Entered:09/23/22 11:35:49 Desc: Main

Document Page 3 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22362 Filed:09/22/22 Entered:09/23/22 11:35:49 Desc: Main

Document Page 4 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22362 Filed:09/22/22 Entered:09/23/22 11:35:49 Desc: Main

Document Page 5 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22362 Filed:09/22/22 Entered:09/23/22 11:35:49 Desc: Main

Document Page 6 of 7
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22362 Filed:09/22/22 Entered:09/23/22 11:35:49 Desc: Main

Document Page 7 of 7
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 

AMENDMENT 
 TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This Amendment (“Amendment”) to the existing Employment Agreement, by and between ZS Pharma, Inc.
(“ZS Pharma”) and the undersigned employee of ZS Pharma (“Employee”), originally entered into on the date indicated below Employee’s signature, (the “Employment
Agreement”) and as amended on March 21, 2014, is hereby made and entered into by ZS Pharma and Employee effective as of June 16, 2014 (the “Effective Date”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein are
used as defined in the Employment Agreement. 
 RECITALS 

WHEREAS, there are certain discrepancies among the various documents relating to the vesting schedules for the employee’s options
set forth in the Employment Agreement, the stock option plan or plans pursuant to which the Employee received options from the Company and the stock option agreement or agreements the Employee entered into with the Company. 

WHEREAS, for the avoidance of doubt the parties wish to clarify certain provisions in the Employment Agreement to remove those
discrepancies;  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 

Section 1. Amendment. 
 A. The definition of
“Liquidity Event” in Section 13(l) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows: 

“‘Liquidity Event’ means a Deemed Liquidation Event.” 

B. The definition of “Qualified IPO” in Section 11(o) of the Employment Agreement shall be removed in its entirety. 

Section 2. Ratification of Agreement. Except as expressly modified and amended herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Employment
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 Section 3. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be construed in accordance with
and governed by the laws of the State of Texas, without regard to principles of conflicts of laws. 
 (Signature page follows) 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to the Employment Agreement
as of the Effective Date. 
  

					
	ZS PHARMA:				EMPLOYEE:
			
	ZS PHARMA, INC.				
			
	  
				  

	(Signature)				(Signature)
			
	  
				  

	(Print Name)				(Print Name)
			
	  
				  

	(Title)				(Current Title)
			
					  

			
					  

					(Date of Signature)
			
					  

					(Date of Employment Agreement)
EXHIBIT A 

Schedule of Claims Subject to the Five Hundred Thirty-Ninth Omnibus Objection 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22743-1 Filed:10/28/22 Entered:10/28/22 18:06:26 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 2
Five Hundred Thirty-Ninth Omnibus Objection

Exhibit A - Satisfied Claims

NAME DATE FILED DEBTOR CLAIM #

ASSERTED CLAIM 

CASE NUMBER AMOUNT

 1 HERNANDEZ CASTRODAD, FIDECICOMISO 11/01/2017 17 BK 03283-LTS Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 264

HC-06 BOX 72502

CAGUAS, PR 00725

$28,750.00

Reason: Invoice(s) totaling $28,750.00 were paid via checks 00025421, 00026612, 00028836, and 00033381 on 06/06/2017, 06/22/2017, 08/10/2017, and 12/06/2017.

 2 RODRIGUEZ GONZALEZ, NATIVIDAD 06/29/2018 17 BK 03283-LTS Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 134695-1

PO BOX 623

ISABELA, PR 00662

Undetermined*

Reason: Proof of Claim asserts claim reimbursement for reservation at Centro Vacacional de Boquerón. The records of the Department of Natural and Environmental Resources show a 

credit in the amount of $345 was issued on 1/8/2022. A portion of this claim has been transferred into the Administrative Claims Reconciliation (ACR) process and will be resolved 

consistent with the ACR procedures. Because this objection does not constitute an objection to the portion of the claim in the ACR process, the Debtors’ reserve their rights to object to 

the remaining portion of the claim on any other grounds whatsoever.

TOTAL $28,750.00*

*Indicates claim contains unliquidated and/or undetermined amounts 1

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22743-1 Filed:10/28/22 Entered:10/28/22 18:06:26 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   YEAR
<PERIOD-START>                                   OCT-01-1995
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                SEP-30-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              4,501
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                        76,101
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   80,602
<PP&E>                                              2,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     86,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              34,835
<BONDS>                                            23,027
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                               78
<OTHER-SE>                                         26,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       86,406
<SALES>                                           120,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  120,948 
<CGS>                                             107,057
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     118,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    (193)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    2,176
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     2,059
<INCOME-TAX>                                          824
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 1,235
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        1,235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0



</TABLE>
§ 614.4351 Computation of lending and leasing limit base. ( a ) *Lending and leasing limit base.* An institution's lending and leasing limit base is composed of the total capital (tier 1 and tier 2) of the institution, as defined in § 628.2 of this chapter, with adjustments applicable to the institution provided for in § 628.22 of this chapter, and with the following further adjustments: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) Eligible third-party capital that is required to be excluded from total capital under § 628.23 of this chapter may be included in the lending limit base.
( b ) *Timing of calculation.* The lending limit base will be calculated on a monthly basis as of the preceding month end.
[58 FR 40321, July 28, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 37403, July 22, 1994; 64 FR 34517, June 28, 1999; 70 FR 35348, June 17, 2005; 70 FR 53907, Sept. 13, 2005; 81 FR 49772, July 28, 2016; 86 FR 54356, Oct. 1, 2021]
§ 381.10 Consultation. Before issuing any notice of deficiencies under § 381.8(b), determining to impose requirements or restrictions under § 381.9(a), or issuing a divestiture order pursuant to § 381.9(c) with respect to a covered company that is likely to have a significant impact on a functionally regulated subsidiary or a depository institution subsidiary of the covered company, the Board— ( a ) Shall consult with each Council member that primarily supervises any such subsidiary; and
( b ) May consult with any other Federal, state, or foreign supervisor as the Board considers appropriate.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-1036

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM122AD

A320-25-1294, R05 --- 1/22/09

A320-25-1294, R04 --- 3/13/08

A320-25-1294, R03 --- 1/22/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3212 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3212

 To provide additional funds for deployment rotation and other relief 
               for United States troops serving in Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 2003

 Mr. Shuster introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committee 
 on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide additional funds for deployment rotation and other relief 
               for United States troops serving in Iraq.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR DEPLOYMENT ROTATION AND 
              OTHER RELIEF FOR UNITED STATES TROOPS SERVING IN IRAQ.

    (a) Availability.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
$200,000,000 of the amount made available for United States 
contributions to the United Nations under the heading ``International 
Organizations and Conferences--contributions to international 
organizations'' under the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, 
the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2004, may be 
made available to provide adequate deployment rotation and other relief 
for United States troops serving in Iraq.
    (b) Exception.--The requirement of subsection (a) shall not apply 
if the United Nations adopts a resolution that provides support for the 
security, rehabilitation, and reconstruction activities of the United 
States in Iraq and provides appropriate financial and in kind 
contributions from other member nations of the United Nations in 
support of such activities.
                                 <all>
```
# Dor-osx'-wtp'ii'i x 

# A Maniste e County Blacke r Airpor t Authorit y

232 3 Airpor

t Roa d• Manistee , Michiga

n 4966 0 •(231 ) 723^35 1 ,-_. Decembe r15th , 201 1 ^ ^ilS=?; ' Denni s DeVan y^ sS m Chief , Essentia l Ai rServic e Division , X-5 3 ^ ^ ^^— i Officeo f Aviatio n Analysi s 1 ^ ^^ o Departmen t o f Transportatio n ^ _--s:"* ^ 120 0 Ne w JerseyAvenu e S E ' ^ -- ' Washington , D.C

. 2059 0 Dea rMr

. DeVany , A t it s regularl yschedule d meetin g o n Decembe r12* , 2011 , th e Maniste e Blacke rAirpor t Authorit yme t t o revie w th e bid s fo rEssentia l Ai rServic e a t Manistee , M l receive d i n respons e t o orde r201 1 -10-15

. Th e Maniste e Blacke rAirpor t Authorit yi s compose d o f thre e Maniste e Count y Commissioners , on e Cit yo f Maniste e representativ e an d thre e at-larg e member s t o ensur e tha t th e interest s o f th e communit yar e broadl yrepresente d o n th e Authority

. Afte rsignifican t discussio n o f th e merit s o f th e Ai rChoic e On e proposa l th e Maniste e Blacke rAirport Authorit yvote d unanimousl yt o no t waiv e th e twin-engin e requiremen t fo r Essentia l Ai rService

. Th e Authorit yfurthe rvote d unanimousl yt o pursu e a n applicatio n wit h DO T fo rAlternat e Essentia l Ai rService

. W e reques t tha t a t thi s tim e th e carrie rselectio n proces s fo r Maniste e b e suspende d whil e th e Airpor t Authorit ywork s t o provid e a n Alternat e Essentia l Ai rServic e proposa l t o DO T fo rconsideration

. Sincerely ,



### Barry Lin d Airport Directo r Maniste e Count

y Blacke r Airport
Supreme Court — Appellate Term,

January, 1901.

Before Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

#### William H. Condon, Appellant, v. Darius O. Mills, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, third district, borough of Manhattan.

W. H. Condon, for appellant; no appearance for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
-------------------- SERVED: AUGUST 22,2012 

IN THE MATTER OF 

··.~ 

SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0873 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

?Uil 

. This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011NM060063) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. Ali future pleadings and other· 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
......... 

----------

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 · Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000

1 

Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

Director- Government and Legal Affairs 

SkyWest Airlines 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84790 

TEL: 435-634-3530 

FAX: 435-634-3505 

ONE COPY 

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2161 

FAX: 425-:-227-1007 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0873 

. (Civil Penalty Action) 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-3 66-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, nse the following addiess: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3147

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 22, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 324 TwentyFifth Street in Ogden, Utah, as the ‘‘James V. Hansen 

Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3147 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The Federal building located at 324 Twenty-Fifth 

3 Street in Ogden, Utah, shall be known and designated as 

4 the ‘‘James V. Hansen Federal Building’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

8 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be 

9 a reference to the ‘‘James V. Hansen Federal Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 21, 2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
*

The Honorable James B. Loken became Chief Judge of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on April 1, 2003.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3243

___________

Deborah J. Blake, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Western District of Missouri.

*

Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner * [UNPUBLISHED]

of Social Security, *

*

Defendant - Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: February 14, 2003

Filed: June 9, 2003

___________

Before LOKEN,*

 RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Deborah Blake applied for Social Security disability and supplemental security

income benefits, alleging that she became disabled on September 27, 1998, following

a January 1998 motor vehicle accident. After an evidentiary hearing, the

administrative law judge found that Ms. Blake suffers from osteoarthrosis and back

disorders which are severe but not listed impairments; that she cannot perform her
1

The HONORABLE DEAN WHIPPLE, Chief Judge of the United States

District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

-2-

past relevant work as institutional cook, poultry lineworker, housekeeper, and laundry

worker; but that she has the residual functional capacity to perform a significant range

of sedentary work, such as addresser and touch up screener, and is therefore not

disabled. Ms. Blake petitioned for judicial review of this adverse final agency action.

The district court1

 affirmed, concluding that the ALJ’s decision is supported by

substantial evidence on the administrative record as a whole. 

On appeal, Ms. Blake argues that the ALJ’s finding regarding her residual

functional capacity -- that she can “lift a maximum of 10 pounds; sit or stand for 1

hour; walk 30 minutes; is limited in overhead reaching; is slightly limited in reaching

outward; should only occasionally climb, balance, kneel, stoop, or crawl; and should

avoid hazardous equipment” -- is unacceptably vague in that it fails to quantify any

precise limitation, is incomplete in that it fails to address all her limitations, and fails

to cite supporting record evidence. However, after careful review of the

administrative record, we agree with the Commissioner that any weakness in the

ALJ’s description of Ms. Blake’s residual functional capacity is merely an “arguable

deficiency in opinion-writing” that “had no practical effect on the outcome of the

case.” Brown v. Chater, 87 F.3d 963, 966 (8th Cir. 1996) (quotation omitted).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in

the court’s order dated June 25, 2002. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.