UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF:

Michael Geoffrey Hackett

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF 

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS

SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & 

(a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION DJI Phantom 3 

UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM

PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF

THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 

(PUBLIC LAW 112-95)

Submitted on April 16, 2015 

Michael Geoffrey Hackett

38 West Park Place

New Orleans, La. 70124

504-628-8996

mghackett@mac.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page 

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................3 

SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................4 

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER....................................................4 

BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................4 

BASIS FOR PETITION.........................................................................................................5 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER.............................................................7 

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH MICHAEL GEOFFREY 

HACKETT SEEKS EXEMPTION.................................................................8 

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT SEEKS AND THE 

REASON MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT SEEKS THE RELIEF.........................11 

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT’S REQUEST 

WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST .........................................................15 

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION WOULD NOT ADVERSELY 

AFFECT SAFETY..........................................................................19 

SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER......34 

ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS AVAILABLE TO 

SUPPORT MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT ’S REQUEST.........34 

CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................35 

APPENDICES........................................................................................37
GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level

AOI Area of Interest

ATC Air Traffic Control

ATO Air Traffic Organization

AV Aerial Vehicle

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

COA Certificate of Authorization

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation 

GCS Ground Control Station 

GPS Global Positioning System

LOL Loss of Link 

NAS National Airspace System

NOTAM Notice to Airman

PIC Pilot In Command

Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333

SO Safety Observer

SOP Standard Operating Procedures

UA Unmanned Aircraft

UAS Unmanned Aircraft System

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VLOS Visual Line of Site

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions

VTOL Vertical Takeoff and Landing
SUMMARY

Michael Geoffrey Hackett seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 

91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to 

operate an Unmanned Aircraft System pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit Michael Geoffrey Hackett to operate an 

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and 

photography of real estate, landmarks, landscapes for television and film, and for historical 

reference.

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT provides his clients with photography and videography of 

properties for the purpose of advertising. MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT has many hours 

flying experience. He has over 17 years of video production and photography experience. The 

objective of MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT and his aerial operations is to provide high 

quality imaging for a variety of commercial, public, and residential uses, specifically targeting:

• Residential Construction

• Real-estate marketing

• Television Production

BACKGROUND

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Phantom 3 UASs

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT seeks an exemption to operate DJI systems for compensation 

or hire within the NAS. The DJI Phantom 3 is a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned 

Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart phone 
systems. The DJI Phantom 3 has a maximum gross weight of 6 pounds 7.5 ounces, a length of 17.3 

inches, width of 17.7 inches, height of 11.8 inches, and a maximum speed of approximately 42 

knots. The DJI Phantom 3UAs is equipped with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer 

battery powered electric motors. 

BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation 

Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), 

Section 333, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, hereby petitions the 

Administrator to commercially operate a DJI Phantom 3 UASs in the National Airspace System 

(NAS), and for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 

91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). 

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the 

unmanned aircraft and its operation, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT operation of the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an 

airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. 

Accordingly, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements 

for maintenance that only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent 

level of safety will be ensured. MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT will use experienced 

personnel or technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the 

UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., 

Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, MICHAEL 

GEOFFREY HACKETT will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 

3 UAS. 

Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot privileges and 

limitations: Pilot in command, is requested by MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT to the extent 

necessary to allow a Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as 

well as an airman medical certificate, and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight- hour 

and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a 

manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft 

airworthiness, because the DJI Phantom 3 UAS does not require an airworthiness certificate in 

accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. As such, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT 
submits that he will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is in airworthy condition, prior to every 

flight, by determining that the UAS are in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly 

Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual), and that the aircraft are in a condition 

for safe flight. 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 

91.121, entitled Altimeter Settings, as the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will not have a typical barometric 

altimeter onboard. However, altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be provided to 

the PIC via Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data 

link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path. This 

altitude information, combined with MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT’s operation of the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS within visual line of sight, at or below 400 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety 

equivalent to Section 91.121. 

Additionally, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT seeks an exemption from the requirements of 

Section 91.151(b), entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions. MICHAEL GEOFFREY 

HACKETT submits that safety will not be affected by operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS during 

daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with 

enough battery power to fly for a total duration of approximately 14.5 minutes to the first point of 

intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. 

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT provides the following 

information in support of its petition for exemption:

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner.

The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is:

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT

38 West Park Place

New Orleans, La. 70124

504 628 8996

mghackett@mac.com
B. The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT 

Seeks Exemption. 

1. MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks Exemption From The Requirements 

Of Section 61.113(a) And (b). 

Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, 

subsections (a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part: 

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) 

of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may 

that person, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft. 

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in 

connection with any business or employment if— 

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and 

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. 

2. MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks Exemption From The Requirements 

Of Section 91.7(a).

Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, subsection (a), states the following: 

(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition. 

3. MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks Exemption From The Requirements 

Of Section 91.121. 

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, subsection (a), states the following, in part: 

(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level 

of that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when 

operating-- 

(1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to-- 

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 

100 nautical miles of the aircraft; 

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this 

section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available 

station; or 
(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the 

departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before 

departure. 

4. MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks Exemption From The Requirements 

Of Section 91.151(b).

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, subsection

 (b), states the following: 

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless 

(considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the 

first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for 

at least 20 minutes. 

5. MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks Exemption From The Requirement 

Of Section 91.405(a).

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required, subsection (a), states the following: Each 

owner or operator of an aircraft— 

(a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall 

between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have 

discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.] 

6. MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks Exemption From The Requirements 

Of Section 91.407(a)(1) 

Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, 

or alteration, subsection (a)(1), states the following: 

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive 

maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless-- 

(1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under § 43.7 

of this chapter[.] 

7. MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks Exemption From The Requirements 

Of Sections 91.409(a)(1) And 91.409(a)(2). 

Section 91.409, entitled Inspections, subsection (a), states the following:
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an 

aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had -- 

(1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been 

approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or 

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 

part 21 of this chapter. 

8. MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks Exemption From The Requirements 

Of Sections 91.417(a) And 91.417(b). 

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records, subsections (a) and (b), state the following: 

(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each 

registered owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified 

in paragraph (b) of this section: 

(1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and 

records of the 100-hour, annual, progressive, and other required or approved 

inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each 

engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft. The records must include-- 

(i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the 

work performed; and 

(ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and 

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the aircraft 

for return to service. 

(2) Records containing the following information: 

(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and 

each rotor. 

(ii) The current status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, 

rotor, and appliance. 

(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which 

are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis. 

(iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the 

last inspection required by the inspection program under which the aircraft 

and its appliances are maintained. 

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety 

directives including, for each, the method of compliance, the AD or safety 
directive number and revision date. If the AD or safety directive involves 

recurring action, the time and date when the next action is required. 

(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major 

alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, propellers, 

and appliances. 

(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed: 

(1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until 

the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is 

performed. 

(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and 

transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold. 

(3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of 

this chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is 

approved for return to service. 

C. The Extent Of Relief MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks And The Reason 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks The Relief. 

1. Extent Of Relief MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks And The Reason 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks Relief From Section 61.113(a) And (b). 

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in 

command, is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private pilot or higher level 

certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has met certain flighthour and currency requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for compensation 

or hire. 

This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a 

private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any 

business or employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and (2) 

The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. 

As set forth more fully below, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT submits that an equivalent 

level of safety will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 

UAS unless that PIC has met certain flight-hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that the 

PIC is able to safely operate either the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with the 

operations specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency 

maneuvers, as well as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and 

structures.

Further, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT submits that all flights of theDJI Phantom 3 UASs, 

conducted by the PIC pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be incidental to MICHAEL 
GEOFFREY HACKETT’s business; and (2) will not carry passengers or property for compensation 

or hire. 

2. Extent Of Relief MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks And The Reason 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks Relief From Section 91.7(a). 

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, is requested to the extent required 

to allow MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT to determine that the DJI Phantom 2 and DJI 

Phantom 3 UASs are in airworthy condition prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in 

compliance with the operating documents (i.e., the MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Aerial 

Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 2 and DJI 

Phantom 3 UASs do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, 

Subpart H. Therefore, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 

UAS are in airworthy condition based upon its compliance with the operating documents (i.e., 

Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual) prior to every flight, and 

further, determine that the aircraft are in condition for safe flight, as stated in the conditions and 

limitations below.

3. Extent Of Relief MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks And The Reason 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks Relief From Section 91.121. 

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow flight operations 

of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS equipment, and a radio 

communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information from the UA to the PIC at the 

ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any altitude information concerning 

UAS operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet above ground level (AGL), 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3 UA’s 

altimeter may be set on the ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or 

field altitude, before each flight. 

Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought to 

the extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As more 

fully set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since the DJI Phantom 3 

UAS is equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which automatically 

ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight, and provides the 

PIC with altitude information of the UA on the heads-up display of the GCS. 

4. Extent Of Relief MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks And The Reason 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks Relief From Section 91.151(b). 
Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, is requested 

to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight 

hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for a total 

duration of 14.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, 

to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT seeks the requested 

relief because without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration of the battery 

powered DJI Phantom 3 UAs will severely constrain the practicality of any aerial video or still 

photo flight operations that MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT proposes to conduct pursuant to 

this Petition. 

Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UASs, the DJI 

DJI Phantom 3 operating documents, and MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT’s proposed 

operating limitations, ensure that MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT will safely operate the 

battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions 

(VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 

14.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after 

that for at least 4.5 minutes.

5. Extent Of Relief MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks And The Reason 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks Relief From Sections 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b). 

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply to 

aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT requests relief from 

these Sections because the DJI Phantom 3 UAS does not require airworthiness certificates. As set 

forth more fully below, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for 

operation without an airworthiness certificate. Accordingly, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT 

will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the 

UASs using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the UAS operating documents 

(i.e., the MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance 

Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT 

will document and maintain all maintenance records for the and DJI Phantom 3 UAS. 

D. The Reasons Why Granting MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Request Would Be In 

The Public Interest; That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole. 

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing MICHAEL GEOFFREY 

HACKETT to safely, efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of real 

estate, and landscapes over certain areas of the United States. 
Additionally, use of theDJI Phantom 3 UAS will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce pollution, 

and provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits of MICHAEL GEOFFREY 

HACKETT’s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be realized without implicating 

any privacy issues. 

1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS. 

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS is a battery powered and serve as a safe, efficient, and economical 

alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By reducing the 

amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use of 

the DJI Phantom 3 UAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and 

air pollution, as well as increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground. 

Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestion around 

airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not 

require an airport to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft conducting aerial 

video and photography missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be handled by air traffic 

control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of flight operations.

2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI Phantom 3 

UAS. 

Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, instead of manned aircraft, will 

greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated 

during traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations. By using battery power and 

electric motors, DJI Phantom 3 UAS produces no air pollution, and is the most viable 

environmentally conscious alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine 

aircraft that are typically utilized for aerial video and photography, while burning approximately 

20-30 gallons per hour of leaded aviation fuel.

By using the DJI Phantom 3 UASs to perform aerial acquisitions, the substantial risk to life and 

property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional manned aircraft 

flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. Aside from the lack of 

flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS (weighing 

approximately 6 pounds 7.5 ounces, at their maximum gross weights with length of 17.3 inches 

respectively, widths of 16 inches and 17.7 inches respectively, and with no fuel on board), has less 

physical potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, and in the air, compared 

to the manned aircraft that typically conduct similar operations (weighing approximately 6,000 

pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a length of 34 feet, and a fuel capacity of 180 

gallons). 

3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI Phantom 3 

UAS Will Benefit The Economy. 
In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is also an economical alternative to 

using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, operation of the DJI Phantom 3 

UAS will allow United States based companies, like MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT, to 

remain competitive and contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost 

of aviation fuel and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatory actions phasing out 

leaded aviation fuels, U.S. owned and operated companies must adopt new and alternative 

technology in order to remain competitive. Operating the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS is 

one such technology that not only allows companies greater operational flexibility compared to 

manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the high operational cost of a traditional 

manned aircraft. 

By operating the DJI Phantom 2 and DJI Phantom 3 UASs, companies such as MICHAEL 

GEOFFREY HACKETT, can remain competitive and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job 

stability to employees and contractors, which will ultimately contribute to growth of the U.S. 

economy. Improved financial performance of U.S. companies, through commercial use of the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS, provides a stable workforce that increases consumer spending; improves local, 

state, and federal tax revenues; and allows companies to invest in research and development in 

order to remain competitive both in the United States and abroad. 

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or 

How The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided 

By The Rule From Which MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks Exemption. 

1. Reasons Why The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Meet The Conditions Of The FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333. 

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the 

unmanned aircraft and its operation, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT’s DJI Phantom 3 UAS 

meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in 

accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. 

Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification and sets 

forth requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the 

public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the 

following, in part: 

(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later 

than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation 

shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national 
airspace system before completion of the plan and rulemaking required by section 332 

of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this Act. 

(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.--In making the determination under 

subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum-- 

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, 

weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated 

areas, and operation within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users 

of the national airspace system or the public or pose a threat to national 

security; and

(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or 

airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, 

is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under 

paragraph (1). 

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.--If the Secretary determines under this section 

that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace 

system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such 

aircraft systems in the national airspace system. 

In seeking this exemption, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT submits that the DJI Phantom 3 

UAS can operate safely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: (a) the 

characteristics of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the 

specific operating limitations. 

a. The Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Demonstrate Its Safe 

Characteristics.

The DJI Phantom 3 UASs does not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise 

pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational capability. 

i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS. 

The technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is set forth by the DJI Phantom 3 User 

Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A. 
ii. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Autonomous Flight And Navigation Modes 

Enable The UAS To Remain Within A Defined Operational Area. 

The DJI Phantom 3 UASs may be operated in both manual and fully autonomous flight modes. A 

complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is provided at 

pages 12-16 and 45-50 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manuals, attached hereto as Appendix B. 

iii. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Are Designed For Automatic Return To 

Home Point Or Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link Or 

Navigation. 

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will remain stationary, in flight, for 3 

seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS does not reacquire control link data 

from the GCS, the UAS will assume that the Control Link is lost and the UAS will return to the 

home position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff position and shutdown. 

A complete description of the Failsafe Functions of the DJI Phantom 3 at pages 13 through 15 of 

the DJI Phantom 3 User Manuals, attached hereto as Appendix B. 

iv. The DJI Phantom 3 GCS And Its Operation.

A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 GCS and flight 

control software is provided at pages 40 through 47 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual. DJI 

Phantom 3 User Manuals are attached hereto as Appendix A. 

b. Flight Operations Of DJI Phantom 3 UAS Is Limited To The Line Of Sight 

Of A Certificated Pilot in Command With A Safety Observer. 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT will be the only person to act as a pilot in command (PIC) of 

the DJI Phantom 3 UAS. Additionally, a safety observer will assist in flights.

c. Flights Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Will Be Conducted Pursuant To Specific 

Operating Limitations. 

In seeking this exemption, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT proposes to commercially operate 

the DJI Phantom 3 UASs for the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over 

certain areas of United States, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations:
1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following 

aircraft described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UASs weighing less than 55 

pounds maximum gross weight: DJI Phantom 3 Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Proposed 

operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this 

grant. 

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for the 

purpose of aerial video and photography. 

3. The UAS may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a 

special request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in 

feet AGL. 

5. The UAs must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. 

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than 

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate. 

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not 

permitted. 

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy the 

VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The SO and 

PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or texting 

is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight 

and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The PIC must 

ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the operating documents. 

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and 

avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and is not 

permitted to operate the camera or other instruments. 
9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during UAS 

operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists 

between the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the 

procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations 

contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, 

the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The 

operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility 

to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator 

upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it 

petitions for extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator 

determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA 

granted the exemption, then the operator must petition for amendment to its grant of 

exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) may be contacted if questions 

arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents. 

10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition 

for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the 

UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has 

been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground 

Control Station must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and 

alterations must be properly documented in the aircraft records.

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS 

operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must 

undergo a functional test flight. The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must 

make an entry in the aircraft records. 

12. The pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. 

inoperable components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant 

sections of the operating documents. 

13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component, 

maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements. 
14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping 

requirements, in accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, 

alterations, and status of replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the 

aircraft records, including total time in service, description of work accomplished, and 

the signature of the authorized person returning the UAS to service. 

15. Each UASs operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer 

Safety Bulletins. 

16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the corrective 

action taken against discrepancies discovered between inspections. 

17. The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current thirdclass medical certificate. 

18. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the 

operator’s qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS 

in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under the exemption, 

including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances 

from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must be 

logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of 

training the operator’s PICs are permitted under the terms of the exemption. However, 

training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During 

training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for flight 

operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with 

appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. 

19. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. 

All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If 

flight at night is required, a special request will be made at the FAA office closest to 

proposed area of operations. Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not 

authorized. 

20. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point as 

denoted on a current FAA-published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement 
with that airport’s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in 

accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA. The letter of agreement 

with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator upon 

request. 

21. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC. 

22. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a predetermined location within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in 

accordance with the operating documents. 

23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies 

in accordance with the operating documents. 

24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the 

intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power remaining. 

25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of 

Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of 

exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman 

(NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the 

operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance with airspace requirements 

in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and potential 

transponder requirements. 

26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (NNumber) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be 

as large as practicable. 
27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and 

control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 

or other appropriate government oversight agency requirements. 

28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to 

the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating. 

These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement 

official upon request. 

29. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation 

operations and activities at all times. 

30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons), 

vessels, vehicles, and structures unless: 

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating 

persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator 

must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a 

situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are 

within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately and/or; 

b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the owner/

controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission and the 

PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects 

and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, and; 

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do 

not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a). 
32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission 

from land owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight 

to be conducted.

33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported 

to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be 

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions 

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov. 

2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And 

(b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT submits that the equivalent level of safety established by 

Section 61.113(a) and (b) will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency 

requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent 

with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate 

distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Considering MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT’s proposed area of operations, and the operating 

limitations set forth-above; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements 

to those of commercial pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship skills 

necessary to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT submits 

that the additional manned airmanship experience of a commercially certificated pilot would not 

correlate to the airmanship skills necessary for MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT’s specific 

proposed flight operations. 

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 

11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 

11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS 

unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour requirements or the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS training and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency 

maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 
Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 

61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those 

hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under 

the exemption). In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and 

landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). 

As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that was 

obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety during 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT’s proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior 

documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would 

ensure safe operations, stating as follows: 

In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the 

purpose of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated 

and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS 

rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi-rotor UAS. 

Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the PIC must also have accumulated and 

logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS 

to be used for operations under the exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these 

minimum hour requirements to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and 

model time may be included in the 10 hours of multi-rotor time and the 10 hours may be 

included in the total 25 hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, 

the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency 

purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flight-hour requirements in Exemption 

No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build proficiency in the skills necessary to safely 

conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. The FAA also finds that prior documented 

flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would satisfy 

this requirement. Training, proficiency, and experience-building flights can also be 

conducted under the grant of exemption to accomplish the required flight time. During 

training, proficiency, and experience-building flights the PIC is required to operate the UA 

with appropriate distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119. 

Exemption No. 11138 at page 15. 

Accordingly, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT will ensure safe operations by not allowing any 

PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum 

flight-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 or 

DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency 

maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a) Would 

Not Adversely Affect Safety. 
The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to 

every flight, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is in an 

airworthy condition based upon the UAS’s compliance with its operating documents and as stated 

in the conditions and limitations herein. 

Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 

11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 

11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). 

4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121 Would 

Not Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained because the altitude 

information of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be provided to the PIC via GPS equipment and a radio 

communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active 

monitoring of the flight path and altitude. This altitude information, combined with MICHAEL 

GEOFFREY HACKETT’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS within visual line of sight, at or 

below 400 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude 

information will be generated by GPS equipment installed onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, 

a zero altitude initiation point is automatically established by the UASs at ground level. 

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to UAS, in circumstances 

similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 

11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 

11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). 

5. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b) 

Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. 

Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS; (2) the 

limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed flight operations. 

Accordingly, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT will ensure that it will safely operate the battery 

powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power 

to fly for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming 

normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. 

Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS; the 

limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed operations, will 
ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). Furthermore, 

safety will be ensured as the DJI Phantom 3 UAS provide audible and visual warnings to the PIC at 

the GCS when the UAS experiences low battery voltage, the first warning occurring at 

approximately 33% remaining battery power, and again at approximately 10% remaining battery 

power. At the critically low battery level, tDJI Phantom 3 UAS will descend and land 

automatically. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that 

safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the 

UAS are considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the 

minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. 

Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 8811, 

10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11136, 

11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). 

6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would Not 

Adversely Affect Safety. 

In seeking this exemption, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT submits that the equivalent level of 

safety with regard to the regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by 

Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met because 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, 

alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and practices 

prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., the MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Aerial 

Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). 

Furthermore, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT will document and maintain all maintenance 

records for theDJI Phantom 3 UAS. 

Since the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be inspected as prescribed by the operating documents, 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by 

Sections 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1), and 91.409(a)(2). A copy of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manuals are 

attached hereto as Appendix A; a copy of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS Maintenance LOG is attached 

hereto as Appendix B. 

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because MICHAEL GEOFFREY 

HACKETT will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive 

maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the operating 

documents. 

Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by 

Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will 
be performed by trained technicians. Maintenance will be documented and maintained utilizing the 

monthly maintenance log. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)

(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversely affected when 

the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered. 

In consideration of MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT’s proposed operating limitations, the 

operating documents, and the technical aspects of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, MICHAEL 

GEOFFREY HACKETT submits that safety will not be adversely affected by granting exemption 

from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). 

The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAS in circumstances similar, in all material 

respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 

11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 

11160, 11161). 

7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation. 

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) and 

14 C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT requests that 

the FAA prescribe special conditions for the intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which 

contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety 

equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 

91.7 (a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). 

Such special conditions will permit safe operation of the UAS for the limited purpose of 

conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States for compensation 

or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a 

hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and 

further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification in 

accordance with any requirements that must be established for the safe operation of the UAS in the 

NAS. 

Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R.

§ 21.16, for operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, since the airworthiness regulations of 14 C.F.R. 

Part 21 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or unusual design 

features of the aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions, states the following: 

If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain 

adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller 

because of a novel or unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he 

prescribes special conditions and amendments thereto for the product. The special 

conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this chapter and contain such safety 

standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary to 

establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations. 
See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16.

Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may prescribe 

special conditions for MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT’s intended operation of the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS, which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to 

establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 

C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) 

& (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

• A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register, stating: 

The Rules From Which MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT Seeks Exemption: 

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R 

Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) 

& (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). 

A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption MICHAEL GEOFFREY 

HACKETT Seeks: 

This exemption will permit MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT to commercially operate 

an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the purpose of conducting aerial video and 

photography over certain areas of the United States.

• Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To 

Support MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT’s Request. 

This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 

(FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS 

may operate safely in the NAS. As such, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT’s request for 

exemption may be granted pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, 

as set forth above. 

FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard 

to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, 

provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification. 
As discussed in detail above, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT will operate the DJI Phantom 3 

UAS safely in the NAS, without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise 

pose a threat to national security. 

CONCLUSION

As set forth herein, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

§ 11.61 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will 

permit safe operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially, without an airworthiness 

certificate, for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography. By granting this 

Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, by 

allowing MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT to safely, efficiently, and economically operate the 

DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially within the NAS. 

WHEREFORE, in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization 

and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT respectfully requests 

that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R 

Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)

(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT to operate the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography. Dated: 

June 12, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT

38 West Park Place

New Orleans, La. 70124

504 628 8996
Appendices:

A – DJI Phantom 3 Specifications Data Sheet

APPENDIX – A

DJI Phantom 3 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

MICHAEL GEOFFREY HACKETT only utilizes safe and reliable UAS. DJI is an industry leader 

in small UAS production. DJI UASs are loaded with ground breaking software enabling the user to 

set parameters which will not allow flight into controlled airspace. Parameters can also be set to 

limit flight to no higher than a predetermined and set altitude as well as limit flight to a 

predetermined and set distance. In addition, DJI software provides real-time altitude and location 

information to the PIC via the linked monitor (smart phone/tablet devices)

2.2.1 Aircraft

2.2.1.1 Model – Phantom 3

2.2.1.2 Weight (Battery Included) – 1280 grams

2.2.1.3 Hovering Accuracy (GPS Mode) – Vertical: +/- 10cm; Horizontal: +/-1m

2.2.1.4 Max Angular Velocity –Yaw: 2000/s

2.2.1.5 Max Tilt Angle - 350

2.2.1.6 Max Ascent Speed – 5m/s

2.2.1.7 Max Descent Speed – 3m/s

2.2.1.8 Max Speed – 16m/s (ATTI mode, no wind – NOT RECOMMENDED)

2.2.1.9 Max Flight Altitude – 6000m

2.2.1.10 Max Flight Time – Approximately 23 minutes

2.2.1.12 Motor Model – DJI 3510

2.2.1.13 Propeller Model – DJI 1345
2.2.1.14 Operating Temperature Range – 140F to 1040F (-100C to 400C)

2.2.1.15 Dimensions – 17 1⁄4” x 17 3⁄4” x 12”

2.2.2 Gimbal

2.2.2.1 Model – ZENMUSE X3

2.2.2.2 Output Power (with camera) – Static: 9W; In Motion: 11W

2.2.2.3 Operating Current – Static: 750mA; In Motion: 900mA

2.2.2.4 Angular Vibration Range - ±0.030

2.2.2.5 Mounting – Detachable

2.2.2.6 Controllable Range – Pitch: -900 to +300; Pan: ±3200

2.2.2.7 Mechanical Range – Pitch: -1250 to 450; Pan: ±3300

2.2.2.8 Max Controllable Speed – Pitch: 1200/s; Pan: 1800/s

2.2.3 Camera

2.2.3.1 Name – Sony EXMOR

2.2.3.2 Model – 12.4M Pixel

2.2.3.3 Total Pixels – 12.4M

2.2.3.4 Effective Pixels – 12.76M

2.2.3.5 Image Max Size – 4000x3000

2.2.3.6 ISO Range – 100-3200

2.2.3.7 Field of View - 940

2.2.3.8 CMOS – Sony EXMOR 1/2.3”

2.2.3.9 HD Video Recording – UHD(4K): 4096x2160p24/25, 3840x2160p24/25/30; 

FHD: 1920x1080p24/25/30/48/50/60; HD: 1280x720p24/25/30/48/50/60

2.2.3.10 Operating Temperature Range - 320F - 1040F (00C - 400C)

2.2.4 Transmitter

2.2.4.1 Name – C1

2.2.4.2 Operating Frequency – 5.728-5.850GHz; 2.400-2.483GHz

2.2.4.3 Communicating Distance (unobstructed) – 2000m
2.2.4.4 Output Power – 9W

2.2.4.5 Operating Temperature Range - 140F to 1040F (-100C to 400C)

2.2.4.6 Battery – 600mAh LiPo 2S