alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-17-00218-CV

IN RE ESTATE of Leonor V. MUNOZ, Deceased

From the County Court at Law No. 1, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PB7000003L1

Honorable Hugo Martinez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal 

is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT. 

We ORDER that appellee Nora M. Munoz recover her costs of this appeal from appellant 

Oscar J. Munoz. 

SIGNED August 2, 2017.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to my knowledge, the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), for the quarter ended March 31, 2004:

         1. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    May 17, 2004        By:        /s/ Francis K. Ruotolo
         ------------                   -----------------------------------
                                        Francis K. Ruotolo, Chairman and
                                        Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be
retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request.
#### § 263.102 Prevailing party.

Only an eligible applicant that prevailed on the merits of an adversary proceeding may qualify for an award under this subpart.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09168

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

x 09168\09168_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09168\09168_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

09168\09168_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 09168\09168_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09168\09168_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09168\09168_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09168\09168_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09168\09168_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09168\Certification Statement Plant ID 09168.pdf Plant certification statement

x 09168\Supplemental Documents\09168_Follow Up Email.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09168\Supplemental Documents\09168_Follow Up Questions.docx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09168\Supplemental Documents\09168_Oak Grove Plant Area Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09168\Supplemental Documents\09168_Oak Grove Property Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09168\Supplemental Documents\09168_OG C2-31 SEU-1 diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09168\Supplemental Documents\09168_OG C2-31 SEU-2 diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09168\Supplemental Documents\09168_OG C3-36 SEU-1 diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09168\Supplemental Documents\09168_OG C3-36 SEU-2 diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09168\Supplemental Documents\09168_Twin Oak EIS DRAFT 1982.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09168\Supplemental Documents\09168_Twin Oak Environmental Impact Statement Final 1983 - 05062009.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09168\Supplemental Documents\09168_WB-1 OGSES_water balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2


                               September 21, 1995



Little Rock Cardiology Clinic, P.A.
Blandford Physicians Center, 5th Flr.
#5 St. Vincent Circle
Little Rock, Arkansas  72205

HeartCare Arkansas, L.L.C.
7 Office Park Drive, Suite 200
Little Rock, Arkansas  72211

         Re:      MedCath of Little Rock, L.L.C.

Gentlemen and Ladies:

Each of you, together with MedCath of Arkansas, Inc. ("MedCath"), is a member of
MedCath of Little Rock, L.L.C. (the "Company") and has executed the Company's
Operating Agreement ("Operating Agreement") which is set forth as Exhibit B to
the Company's Private Placement Memorandum. By our mutual execution of this
letter, we agree that Section 5.1(v) of the Operating Agreement is hereby
amended to delete that subsection in its entirety and to substitute in lieu
thereof the following:

                  "(v) Subject to applicable law, in order to assure the
         availability to the Hospital of qualified physicians and to maintain
         the quality of medical services to be provided by the Hospital, the
         execution of professional services agreements with Little Rock
         Cardiology Clinic, P.A., an Arkansas professional corporation ("LRCC")
         and Cardiovascular Consultants of Arkansas, P.A., an Arkansas
         professional corporation ("CCA"), under which the physicians of LRCC
         and CCA shall serve as the exclusive providers of cardiology and
         cardiovascular services, including cardiovascular surgery, to the
         Hospital. Such agreements shall provide that LRCC and CCA may, subject
         to the consent of MedCath which shall not be unreasonably withheld or
         delayed enter into subcontracts with other qualified cardiologists and
         cardiovascular surgeons who will assist LRCC and CCA in fulfilling its
         obligations to the Hospital. Any such subcontract shall be subject to
         and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the professional
         services agreements entered into between LRCC, CCA and the Hospital.
         All physicians of LRCC, CCA and any other physicians who provide such
         services to the Hospital must obtain medical staff membership and
         privileges in accordance with the bylaws and the reasonable rules and
         regulations adopted by the Hospital;"

Please indicate your agreement to the terms of this letter by signing a copy in
the space provided below and returning it to me.

[***]


[***] These portions of this exhibit have been omitted and filed separately
      with the Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.
In Special Term —

Gholson, J. presiding.

#### CONSTABLE & Co. *vs.*GEORGE WHITE.

An affidavit, stating how much is due plaintiff; for what it is due; that it is justly due; that plaintiff ought to recover; and that defendant is non-resident, is sufficiently explicit as to the nature of plaintiffs claim, to found an attachment.

On motion to discharge attachment for insufficient affidavit, the Court will not look into the petition and exhibits.

If the affidavit is as the law requires, .the petition may be amended, without ■prejudice to the attachment.

Motion to discharge attachment.

The affidavit on which the attachment issued is as follows :

££ The State of Ohio, Hamilton County. E. A. Thomp£C son, attorney for plaintiffs, makes .oath and says that £l there is due from the defendant to the plaintiffs, for ££ goods and merchandise sold and delivered by plain- ££ tiffs to the said defendant the sum of five thousand dol- £< lars; that said claim is just; that said plaintiffs ought ££ to recover from defendant the sum of five thousand dollars, with interest from tenth day of October 1854. ££ Affiant further states that said defendant is a non-resi- ££ dent of the State of Ohio.”

The ground of the motion was, that the affidavit did not sufficiently show the nature of the plaintiff’s claim.

*45CtHOLSON, J.

I am of opinion that the objection to the attachment is not well taken. The statute (Code 192) requires that the affidavit shall show “the nature of the plaintiff’s claim.”

The preceding section of the Code provides that the claim must be one for the recovery of money, and in the case of a non-resident, must be founded upon contract, judgment, or decree. If the only reason for the requirement that the nature of the claim must be shown, is to be found in these provisions of the statute, the statement in the affidavit is amply sufficient to show that the case is one embraced by them. But, if there be other reasons, not shown on the face of the statute, they cannot require more, than such a setting forth of the nature of the claim, as the present affidavit contains. If more were required, then, nothing short of a full bill of particulars, showing each item of the goods sold and delivered, would suffice. I am not prepared to go to that extent, and shall, therefore, hold the affidavit sufficient.

I am asked to look at the petition, and the exhibit attached, and pass on their sufficiency. This would not, in my opinion, be a proper course of practice on the present motion.

At the commencement of the action, the affidavit is made, and the order of attachment issued. If the affidavit be as required by the, statute, the order of attachment is valid. Even if the petition be defective, it is a subject of amendment, and such amendment might be made without prejudice to the attachment.

Motion overruled.
# C_2018170EN.01000501.xml

| 17.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/5

---

No state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

(2018/C 170/03)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 7 February 2018 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 81382 |
| Decision No | : | 017/18/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Region | : |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Compensation for pension costs to non-profit organisations providing certain health and child welfare services |
| Legal basis | : |
| Type of measure | : | Scheme |
| Objective | : | Health care and social services |
| Form of aid | : | Grants |
| Budget | : | NOK 1,1 billion |
| Intensity | : |
| Duration | : | 100 years |
| Economic sectors | : | Health care and social services |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Health and Care Services |
| PO Box 8011 Dep |
| N-0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

7 February 2018

Case No

Case No

:

81382

Decision No

Decision No

:

017/18/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Region

Region

:

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Compensation for pension costs to non-profit organisations providing certain health and child welfare services

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Scheme

Objective

Objective

:

Health care and social services

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Grants

Budget

Budget

:

NOK 1,1 billion

Intensity

Intensity

:

Duration

Duration

:

100 years

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Health care and social services

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Health and Care Services

PO Box 8011 Dep

N-0030 Oslo

NORWAY

Other information

Other information

:

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
#### §§ 3.39-3.40 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Datascension,
Inc. (the "Company") for  the  quarter  ended  June 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"), I, Scott
Kincer, President and Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
{section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to {section} 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that:

	(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
	of  15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
	78o(d)); and

	(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all
	material respects, the financial condition and  results  of  operations
	of the Company.


Date: August 10, 2007             /s/ D. Scott Kincer
                                  ----------------------
                                  D. Scott Kincer
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer and
				  Principal Financial Officer
H. R. 3104

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To provide for the establishment of separate campaign medals to be awarded to

members of the uniformed services who participate in Operation Enduring Freedom and to members of the uniformed services who participate in Operation

Iraqi Freedom.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SEPARATE MILITARY CAMPAIGN MEDALS TO RECOGNIZE

SERVICE IN OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM AND

SERVICE IN OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM.

(a) REQUIREMENT.—The President shall establish a campaign

medal specifically to recognize service by members of the uniformed

services in Operation Enduring Freedom and a separate campaign

medal specifically to recognize service by members of the uniformed

services in Operation Iraqi Freedom.

(b) ELIGIBILITY.—Subject to such limitations as may be prescribed by the President, eligibility for a campaign medal established pursuant to subsection (a) shall be set forth in regulations

to be prescribed by the Secretary concerned (as defined in section

101 of title 10, United States Code). In the case of regulations

prescribed by the Secretaries of the military departments, the regulations shall be subject to approval by the Secretary of Defense

and shall be uniform throughout the Department of Defense.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 28.1
                                                 ------------

              ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE
                   UCFC LOAN TRUST 
          SERIES 1998-A, 1998-B, 1998-C AND 1998-D
                      
      In accordance with Section 9.16 of that certain Pooling
and  Servicing Agreement relating to UCFC Loan Trust Series 1998-A,
1998-B, 1998-C and 1998-D for the year ended December 31,
1998 (the "Pooling and  Servicing Agreements", by and among 
UCFC Acceptance Corporation, as depositor, United Companies 
Lending Corporation, as servicer (the "Servicer"), and Bankers
Trust Company of California, N.A., as  trustee, the undersigned
officer of the Servicer does hereby certify as follows:  (i) a 
review of the activities of the Servicer during 1998 and of
performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreements has been
made under the undersigned officer's supervision; and (ii) to
the best of such undersigned  officer's  knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Pooling and Servicing Agreements for 1998.

     EXECUTED this 31st day of March, 1999.

                         /s/ JOHN D'ANGELO
                         ------------------------------------
                         John D'Angelo, President
                         United Companies Lending Corporation

                                PAGE 9
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6146

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEITH DEMOND INGRAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CR-00-783; CA-03-2883)

Submitted: July 29, 2005 Decided: August 19, 2005

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Demond Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Keith Demond Ingram seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) unless a circuit justice

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not

issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Ingram has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 99.1

                       Certification of ANTs software inc.
           pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002
 regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of ANTs software inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

      1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:     May 8, 2003                    By: /s/ Francis K. Ruotolo
          -----------                        -----------------------------------
                                             Francis K. Ruotolo, Chairman and
                                             Chief Executive Officer


Date:     May 8, 2003                    By: /s/ Kenneth Ruotolo
          -----------                        -----------------------------------
                                             Kenneth Ruotolo
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             and Secretary
HomeThird-Party Contractor...Ryan Brandt Young

# 									Ryan Brandt Young							

DS Memorial

September 7, 2005

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Third-Party Contractor****Year of Death: 2005**

Ryan Brandt Young, Private Security Contractor, was killed on September 7, 2005, in Basrah, Iraq, by an improvised explosive device.

**Photo: U.S. Government image**

Tags

DS Third Party ContractorIraq

Back to Top
### 11/30/201 1 12.4 2 FAX 202493514 2 FA A rDM S l2]001/00 2



### WILKERSO N HOZUBI N n o K !aHF¥T , q,TT

E« 5 ANOIO R APiF
. 4K-tDlu l TliL : (MT i :T0.1;S 7 

### U.S . DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATTONi'^EPARTMLMLpF ^ OFFIC E O F HTi:ARING S i ;i-NS^OPiTAljO N^ WASHINGTON , D C ' -OCKll l GFERnflOi'l o I n th e Matte r of :
TG I FREIGH T 

# 201 ! Nil V 3 0 P l ^ 2 3 )FA ADocke t No . C?10NM001 2 )DM S NO . rAA-2010-107 9 }Judg e RICHAR D C . GOODWI N REQUES T FO R RULIN G TG I Frf^ i (jhL , throug hcounsel , request s a rulin g o n it s Reques t fo r Alternativ e Hearin g Dare s an d th e supplemen t Lhereto , bot hfile d i n Octobe r 2011 . Undersigne d i s schedule d

- c b e i n tria l durin g th e wee k o f Decembe r 12 , 2011 . Th e matte r wa s o n trac k t o ser.tle , bu t setLl^^men t doe s no t appea r t o b e forthcc.Tiing . Therefore , th e reques t i s fo r date s i n January , excludin g th e wee k o f Januar y23 , 2012 . DATE D thi s 9t hda yo f N^ovember , 2011 . WILKERSO NHOZUBI N Attorney s to r

TG I Freigh t 3 y : AK

Bar . ^

; 

# RECEIVE D NOV} 1 201 1 

# HEARIN G DOCKE T11/30/201 1 1 2 4 2 FAX202493514 2 FA A ^ DM S 002/00 2



### WILKERSO N HOZUBI N JH>KSTBEEr.^1TF.4 M TEL(MT^:7S.5:0 7 VAX : 0OT i :75-3;? l CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E

Thereb y cer-if y tha t or . rh s 9' " da v O f

Ho'-'e-mbGr , 2011 , atru- ^ a n dcorrec t

cop y o t

th eforegoin g w^ S ni;: i Io dt. o th erollowiiiq : Origina lPlu s 1 Cop y Ferterr , lAviatio nAdj:ij.iLioLracio n SCO Independencii ; Avenue , 3.W . Washingron , D

C 205^ ^ Attn : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-'l.'^ n W;iIbo r VJrighT : Buildinq-Sui'. eSWTOO O On eCop y Hcwc.r dL . Mar r

in , Jr . Rt^gicr.c lCounsel , OLLic nCjf Rcgicnzi lCcinsei , AAT,- / nlfiohiu nRegio n ^•edera lAvi.3tJ.0 nAdministratio n 22 2 w 7-'' ' Avenu e#1 4 Anchorage , A? : 95515-758" ? Th eHonorabl eR- . ohrjr dC . Goodwin , Ai±[i±ni5trariv c La w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o i ir^inriportcieio n Offic eo f

.^earin'.js , M-2 0 120 0 Ne wJer.qfi

yAvenue , l-.E . Eas t Building , Groun d "iocr , P.oo mE12-52 0 Washington , D

C 2059 0

WlLKERSOt l HOZUEI N 5i00/::i2/pl^id/F.L-quLvy LLO i Puiiiif )

P,h;OUi:S T fO? . RULIl^C ; I n t.i e Ma--e r o f TG l rV-eiqh t Docke t M o 

### Faq e 2 CP l OnvXiO^? .