alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7405 

WILLIAM JAMES JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior

District Judge. (CA-05-342-5-H)

Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 3, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William James Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

William James Jones, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) because the motion should have been brought

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Stansberry, No. CA05-342-5-H (E.D.N.C. July 12, 2005). We deny Jones’ motion to file

a formal brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)  
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 CONDENSED  
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997  
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                   Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     Sep-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                             1,027,170
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      4,728,282
<ALLOWANCES>                         126,486
<INVENTORY>                           77,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   6,488,170
<PP&E>                             7,703,346
<DEPRECIATION>                     3,463,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    16,538,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              4,819,642
 <BONDS>                           2,884,446
<COMMON>                              40,954
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                         8,413,477
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      16,538,519
<SALES>                           17,920,949
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  17,920,949
<CGS>                              2,625,121
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     11,167,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   5,821,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   276,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      654,891
<INCOME-TAX>                         262,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  392,891
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         392,891
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.11
        

</TABLE>
1 

### Medina, Dayana

From: Reitter, Annabeth <Annabeth.Reitter@domtar.com>

Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 4:19 PM

To: Medina, Dayana

Subject: Domtar Ashdown Mill Power Boile r #1 NOx Stack Test Results

Attachments: removed.txt; No. 1 Power Boiler NOx Stack Test History.xlsx

Hi Dayana,

In follow

‐ up to our discussion on Friday afternoon, I am attaching a summary of the historical NOX stack test results for

Power Boiler #1 at the Domtar Ashdown Mill.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Annabeth

Annabeth Reitter

Corporate Manager, Environmental Regulation

T 715-886-7785 | C 715-459-9257

The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the co rrect file and location.

Domta r

301 Point Basse Avenue

Nekoosa, WI 54457

Domtar reminds you to print responsibly. Learn more about paper as a sustainable choice at paperbecause.com

This email is for the exclusive us e of the addressee and is subject to Domtar Confidentiality Notice.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Sanctioning Human Rights Abusers and Corrupt Actors, and Termination of Zimbabwe Sanctions Authority

# 									Sanctioning Human Rights Abusers and Corrupt Actors, and Termination of Zimbabwe Sanctions Authority							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

March 4, 2024

The United States is today designating eleven Zimbabwean individuals and three entities, including President Emmerson Mnangagwa, under the Global Magnitsky sanctions program for their connection to corruption or serious human rights abuses.  These designations are part of a stronger, more targeted sanctions policy towards Zimbabwe the United States is implementing following President Biden’s approval of a new Executive Order terminating the Zimbabwe sanctions program that had been in effect since 2003.

We continue to have concerns regarding serious cases of corruption and human rights abuse in Zimbabwe.  Key individuals, including members of the Government of Zimbabwe, bear responsibility for these actions, including the looting of government coffers that robs Zimbabweans of public resources.  Multiple cases of abductions, physical abuse, and unlawful killing have left citizens living in fear. 

The United States is committed to ensuring our sanctions are relevant, timely, and targeted against those most closely connected to corruption and human rights abuses.  We continue to urge the Government of Zimbabwe to move toward more open and democratic governance, including addressing corruption and protecting human rights, so all Zimbabweans can prosper.

*The Department of the Treasury designations were taken pursuant to Executive Order 13818, which builds upon and implements the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act and targets perpetrators of serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world.  For more information on today’s actions, see the White House announcement and Treasury’s press release.*

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsCorruptionOffice of the SpokespersonSanctionsThe Secretary of StateZimbabwe

Back to Top
42486.

#### SEATON v. REDISCO, INC.

*Deen and Quillian, JJ., concur.*

Submitted January 9, 1967

Decided January 23, 1967.

*J. E. B. Stewart,*for appellant.

*Lewis, Lewis & Cagle, Robert W. Cagle,*for appellee.

Frankum, Presiding Judge.

On the trial of an action of trover brought by Redisco, Inc. against Mrs. W. E. Seaton a judgment based on a jury verdict was rendered and entered in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant appealed, and in the brief of counsel for appellant the following statement is made: “Appellee presumably made out its case and' the jury returned a verdict for appellee for the piano plus $250 as reasonable hire.” All of the errors enumerated require a consideration of the evidence for a determination of their merits. No brief or transcript of the evidence having been filed and transmitted to this court, there is no question presented by this appeal upon which this court can pass.

*Judgment affirmed.*
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Thomas Group,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, James T. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary of theCompany, certify that to my knowledge:

1.                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ JAMES T. TAYLOR                   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| James T. Taylor                       |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
|                                  |
| April 6, 2007                         |

 

----
§ 328.8 Policies and procedures. ( a ) *Policies and Procedures.* An insured depository institution must establish and maintain written policies and procedures to achieve compliance with this part. Such policies and procedures must be commensurate with the nature, size, complexity, scope, and potential risk of the deposit-taking activities of the insured depository institution and must include, as appropriate, provisions related to monitoring and evaluating activities of persons that provide deposit-related services to the insured depository institution or offer the insured depository institution's deposit-related products or services to other parties.
( b ) *Reservation of authority.* Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the FDIC's authority to address violations of this part, the FDIC's authority to interpret the rules in this part, or any other authority the FDIC has pursuant to any other laws or regulations.
Exhibit 32.1
                          RIVIERA HOLDINGS CORPORATION


                                  CERTIFICATION


In connection with Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Riviera Holdings Corporation for the period ending December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William L.
Westerman, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best
of my knowledge:

1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Riviera Holdings Corporation (the "Company") at the dates and for the
         periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:  May 3, 2006
                                              /s/ William L. Westerman
                                              -------------------------------
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              and interim Treasurer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
#### § 359.7 Applicability in the event of receivership.

The provisions of this part, or any consent or approval granted under the provisions of this part by the FDIC (in its corporate capacity), shall not in any way bind any receiver of a failed insured depository institution. Any consent or approval granted under the provisions of this part by the FDIC or any other federal banking agency shall not in any way obligate such agency or receiver to pay any claim or obligation pursuant to any golden parachute, severance, indemnification or other agreement. Claims for employee welfare benefits or other benefits which are contingent, even if otherwise vested, when the FDIC is appointed as receiver for any depository institution, including any contingency for termination of employment, are not provable claims or actual, direct compensatory damage claims against such receiver. Nothing in this part may be construed to permit the payment of salary or any liability or legal expense of any IAP contrary to 12 U.S.C. 1828(k)(3).
(c) The Operator will have accumulated and logged, in a manner 

consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), a minimum of 25 hours of total time 

as a UAS rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS 

pilot with a multi-rotor UAS. In addition the operator will have logged 

a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating the make and model 

UAS that Operator operates. 

The Operator will be familiar with and able to manually institute the 

Phantom 3 Professional's Return to Home (RTH) feature. This feature 

aborts a flight operation and automatically returns the UAS to a 

predetermined GPS safe point. 

(d) The Operatar will not operate over private property without first 

finding a suitable alternate landing spot on the property. 

(e) The Operator will abort the flight in the event of unpredicted 

obstacles or emergencies in accordance with the operating 

documents. 

(f) The Operator will utilize a two man flight team consisting of the Pilot 

in Command (PIC) and a Visual Observer (VO). This team will 

maintain visual line of sight with the Phantom 3 at all times and 

remain within hearing distance of one another. 

(g) The Operator will not permit flight around vessels, vehicles and 

structures without permission from the owner. 

4. Extent of Relief that the Operator seeks in regards to Section 91.121 

Altimeter Settings Relief from 91.121 is requested because the Phantom 3 

Professional utilizes electronic GPS with a barometric sensor. 

In order to maintain an equal level of safety that 91.121 requires, the PIC of 

the UAS will abort the flight in the events that the UAS loses 

communications with the GPS signal. 

5. Extent of Relief that the Operator seeks in regards to Section 91.151(b) 

Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions 

Relief from 91.151(b) is requested to the extent that allows the Operator to 

operate the Phantom 3 Professional up to a point (considering wind and 

forecast weather conditions) that there is enough power to fly at normal 

cruising speed to the intended landing point and land the UA with 30% 

battery power remaining. 

6. Extent of Relief that the Operator seeks in regards to Sections 

91.405(a),91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1), and (a)(2), 91.417(a) and (b) These 

are all associated with an Airworthiness certificate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000
<CURRENCY>                         U.S. DOLLARS
                                     
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          37,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    392,958
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,727
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 510,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        289,540
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               71
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   510,349
<SALES>                                        516,533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               540,406
<CGS>                                          423,433
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,105
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,319
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,786
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,786
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.48
                                               

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-40115

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Rosario Garza-Gonzalez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:19-CR-1704-4

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Rosario Garza-Gonzalez pleaded guilty to possession with intent to 

distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana, and was sentenced to 60

months of imprisonment and four years of supervised release. The district 

court’s written judgment imposed two special conditions of supervised 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 19, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-40115 Document: 00516060660 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/19/2021
No. 20-40115

2

release: one requiring him to immediately report to the nearest probation 

office if he returns to the United States and another directing that active 

supervision would automatically reactivate if he did so report. GarzaGonzalez and the Government agree that these special conditions are 

improper because they were not orally pronounced at his sentencing.

Because Garza-Gonzalez had no opportunity at his sentencing to 

object to these special conditions that were later included in his written 

judgment, “instead of reviewing for plain error, we review the . . . court’s 

imposition of those conditions for an abuse of discretion.” United States v. 

Mudd, 685 F.3d 473, 480 (5th Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. Bigelow, 

462 F.3d 378, 381 (5th Cir. 2006)) (alteration in original). “The 

pronouncement requirement is not a meaningless formality.” United States 

v. Diggles, 957 F.3d 551, 559–63 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 

825 (2020). “[I]t is part of the defendant’s right to be present at sentencing, 

which in turn is based on the right to mount a defense.” Id. “[I]f the written 

judgment conflicts with the sentence pronounced at sentencing, that 

pronouncement controls.” Mudd, 685 F.3d at 480 (alteration in original) 

(quoting Bigelow, 462 F.3d at 381). Because these two special conditions were 

not announced during the sentencing hearing, the district court abused its 

discretion by including them in the written judgment. See id.; Diggles, 957 

F.3d at 559–63.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is VACATED IN 

PART and the matter is REMANDED to the district court for the limited 

purpose of conforming the written judgment to the oral pronouncement of 

sentence.

Case: 20-40115 Document: 00516060660 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/19/2021
# C_2023154EN.01000401.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

28 April 2023

(2023/C 154/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0981 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,35 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4538 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88050 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,3515 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9839 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,7910 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 23,502 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 373,78 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5815 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9301 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 21,3608 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6664 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4981 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6199 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7864 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4679 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 470,89 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,1558 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5979 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 111,90 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8981 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,923 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,467 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4872 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,8182 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,8555 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0981

JPY

Japanese yen

149,35

DKK

Danish krone

7,4538

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88050

SEK

Swedish krona

11,3515

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9839

ISK

Iceland króna

149,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,7910

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

23,502

HUF

Hungarian forint

373,78

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5815

RON

Romanian leu

4,9301

TRY

Turkish lira

21,3608

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6664

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4981

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6199

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7864

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4679

KRW

South Korean won

1 470,89

ZAR

South African rand

20,1558

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5979

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 111,90

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8981

PHP

Philippine peso

60,923

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,467

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4872

MXN

Mexican peso

19,8182

INR

Indian rupee

89,8555

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
June 25, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

To Whom It May Concern:

Reference: DOT Docket FAA-2001-10876, FAA Exemption No. 6541N, Operation of EAA’s B17 and Spirit of St. Louis for Historical Flight and Education Purposes.

The Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA) is the world leader in recreational aviation. With 

an international membership of more than 180,000 people, EAA brings together pilots, aircraft 

builders, owners, and aviation enthusiasts who are dedicated to sharing the Spirit of Aviation by 

promoting the continued growth of aviation, the preservation of its history, and a commitment to 

its future.

All conditions and limitations contained within this FAA exemption remain valid, as does 

the historic and educational flight purposes for flying the EAA B-17, N5017N, and the EAA 

Ryan replica Spirit of St. Louis, NX211, as authorized by the existing exemption, 6541N.

Therefore, EAA is requesting the exemption be renewed as it continues to be in the best 

interest of the public.

Sincerely,

Mackenzie Dickson

EAA Government Advocacy Specialist