alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 354.2 Definitions. Unless defined in this section, terms shall have the meaning given to them in section 3 of the FDI Act. *Control* means the power, directly or indirectly, to direct the management or policies of a company or to vote 25 percent or more of any class of voting securities of a company, and includes the rebuttable presumptions of control at § 303.82(b)(1) of this chapter and of acting in concert at § 303.82(b)(2) of this chapter. For purposes of this part, the presumptions set forth in § 303.82(b)(1) and (2) of this chapter shall apply with respect to any company in the same manner and to the same extent as if they applied to an acquisition of securities of the company.
*Covered Company* means any company that is not subject to Federal consolidated supervision by the FRB and that controls an industrial bank: ( 1 ) As a result of a change in bank control pursuant to section 7(j) of the FDI Act;
( 2 ) As a result of a merger transaction pursuant to section 18(c) of the FDI Act; or
( 3 ) That is granted deposit insurance by the FDIC pursuant to section 6 of the FDI Act, in each case on or after April 1, 2021.
*FDI Act* means the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1811, *et seq.*
*Filing* has the meaning given to it in § 303.2(s) of this chapter.
*FRB* means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and each Federal Reserve Bank.
*Industrial bank* means any insured State bank that is an industrial bank, industrial loan company, or other similar institution that is excluded from the definition of the term “bank” in section 2(c)(2)(H) of the Bank Holding Company Act, 12 U.S.C. 1841(c)(2)(H).
*Senior executive officer* has the meaning given it in § 303.101(b) of this chapter.
§ 609.920 Interpretations. ( a ) E-SIGN preempts most statutes and regulations, including the Act and its implementing regulations that require paper copies and handwritten signatures in business, consumer, or commercial transactions. E-SIGN requires that statutes and regulations be interpreted to allow E-commerce as long as the safeguards of E-SIGN are met and its exceptions recognized. Generally, an electronic record or signature satisfies any provision of the Act or its implementing regulations that require such records and signatures to be written, signed, or in paper form.
( b ) System institutions may interpret the Act and its implementing regulations broadly to allow electronic transmissions, communications, records, and submissions, as provided by E-SIGN. This means that the terms address, copy, distribute, document, file, mail, notice, notify, record, provide, send, signature, sent, written, writing, and similar words generally should be interpreted to permit electronic transmissions, communications, records, and submissions in business, consumer, or commercial transactions.
#### § 619.9110 Consolidation.

Creation of one new organizational entity from two or more existing entities or parts thereof.
SERVED: APRIL 3, 2012 

.mRMNTOF. 

U.S. DEPARTMBNT OF TRANSPORTATIoM^^^^M^ 

OFFICE OF HEARfNGS ''^^^ L,'l:hA[iUrJo 

WASHINGTON, DC ^^^j ^ ^ . , p . ^S 

IN THE MATTER OF 

BRIAN WALLAESA 

FAA DOCKETNO. CPIOWPOOIO 

(Civil Penally Action) 

FDMSNO. FAA-2010-0628 

NOTICE OF HEARING 

Notice is hereby given that a hearing in the above-entitled matter will be held 

beginning May 22"*^, 2012, at 10 a.m., Eastern Time, at the United States International 

Trade Commission Building. Courtroom A, 500 E Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20436. 

Each party shall serve on the other parly and deliver to the Judge by May 15, 

2012, two copies of each exhibit to be offered at the hearing (consecutively numbered, 

and separately tabbed and paginated), and a list of witnesses, together with a summary of 

their proposed testimony. In addition, each party should bring an original and two copies 

of each proposed exhibit (consecutively numbered, and separately tabbed and paginated) 

for presentation at the hearing. 

Parlies should allow sufficient time to pass through security and are required to 

bring a government-issued photo ID and should note that recording equipment and 

cameras are not permitted in the hearing room. 

SO ORDERED. 

lie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Ju 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CPIOWPOOIO 

(Civil Penally Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1OOO' 

ONE COPY 

Brian Wallaesa, Respondent 

11272 Worlham Crest Circle 

Manassas, VA 20109 

TEL: 570-778-1335 

John C. Stuan, Jr., Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-9958 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

Joseph A. Conte 

Manager, Special Emphasis Enforcement 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-7381 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, El 1-310 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TFX: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address; 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 

2W1000. Washington. DC 20591; Anention: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430. 

- 2 -
§ 253.7 Continuity of contract and safe harbor. ( a ) The provisions of section 105(a)-(d) of the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act, 12 U.S.C. 5804(a)-(d), shall apply to any LIBOR contract for which the Board-selected benchmark replacement becomes the benchmark replacement pursuant to § 253.3(a) or (c).
( b ) Nothing in this part is intended to alter or modify the availability or effect of the provisions of section 105(e) of the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act, 12 U.S.C. 5804(e).
Exhibit 4.2

                                    BGI, INC.
                            CONSULTANT INCENTIVE PLAN

     The  Board  of  Directors  of  BGI,  Inc.,  an  Oklahoma  corporation  (the
"Company"),  by  a  resolution  adopted  May  15, 2000, has created a Consultant
Incentive  Plan  (the  "Plan")  having  the  following  terms  and  conditions.

                                 Administration

     The  Plan  shall  be  administered  by  the  Board  of Directors or, at the
direction  of  the Board of Directors, by a committee of the Board of Directors.
All  grants shall be made in the entire discretion of the Board of Directors (or
such  committee,  if  applicable).

                                 Shares Covered

     The Board of Directors may make grants of the Company's Common Stock, $.001
par  value  ("Common Stock") covering up to 185,000 shares pursuant to the Plan.
Such  grants may take the form of direct grants of Common Stock or of options to
purchase  shares  of Common Stock. Options granted under the Plan shall have the
same  terms  and  conditions  as  options (other than "incentive stock options")
granted  under  the  Company's  1999  Stock Option Plan. The number of shares of
Common  Stock  covered by the Plan shall be adjusted ratably to take into effect
any  stock  splits,  stock dividends, or recapitalization transactions occurring
after  the  adoption  of  the  Plan.  Shares  of Common Stock subject to options
granted  under  the  Plan shall be adjusted as provided by the 1999 Stock Option
Plan  for  such  events.

                                Eligible Persons

     The  Board  of  Directors may authorize grants under the Plan to any person
serving as a consultant or advisor to the Company or to any entity a majority of
whose  voting  securities  is  owned,  directly  or  indirectly, by the Company;
provided,  however,  (i)  that  any person receiving a grant hereunder must be a
natural  person  (who  may be an employee of a corporation or other person not a
natural  person  that  has  contracted with the Company to provide consulting or
advisory  services),  (ii)  that  any  person  receiving  a grant hereunder must
provide  bona fide services to the Company, and (iii) that the services provided
by  the grantee may not be in connection with the offer or sale of securities in
a  capital-raising  transactions,  or  with  directly or indirectly promoting or
maintaining  a  market  for  the  Company's  securities.

                                 Terms of Grant

     No  shares  of Common Stock may be issued pursuant to a direct grant except
in  payment  for  services actually provided prior to the date of grant having a
value  as  determined in the reasonable judgment of the Board of Directors equal
to  or  in excess of both (A) the fair market value of the shares awarded at the
date  of  grant  and  (B)  the  par  or  stated  value  of  the  shares awarded.

                            Termination and Amendment

     The  Board  of  Directors  may  terminate  or  amend  the Plan at any time.


<PAGE>
§ 603.305 Definitions. For the purposes of this part: ( a ) *Agency* means the Farm Credit Administration.
( b ) *Individual* means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence;
( c ) *Maintain* includes maintain, collect, use, or disseminate;
( d ) *Record* means any item, collection, or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by an agency including, but not limited to, that person's education, financial transactions, medical history, and criminal or employment history, and that contains that person's name, or the identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual, such as a finger or voice print or photograph;
( e ) *Routine use* means, with respect to the disclosure of a record, the use of such record for a purpose that is compatible with the purpose for which it was collected;
( f ) *Statistical record* means a record in a system of records maintained for statistical research or reporting purposes only and not used in whole or in part in making any determination about an identifiable individual, except as provided by 13 U.S.C. 8;
( g ) *System of records* means a group of any records under the control of any agency from which information is retrieved by the name of an individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual.
[51 FR 41941, Nov. 20, 1986]
#### Matter of the Petition of Henry H. Lyman, State Commissioner of Excise, for an Order Revoking and Cancelling Liquor Tax Certificates Nos. 10,551, 10,552, 10,553, 10,554, and 10,375, Series of 1899, issued to William Texter.

(Supreme Court, Bangs Special Term,

July, 1900.)

1. Liquor Tax Law — A violation thereof forfeits all the certificates which the offender holds.

The Liquor Tax Law permits one person to hold certificates for any number of places where the liquor traffic is carried on, but, if he violates any provision of the said law, he forfeits all his certificates and the right to .traffic in liquor anywhere.

2. Same — Application for revocation may include all the places of the offender.

A petitioner for revocation may join several places In one application where one person holds the certificates for all the places.

Application for an order revoking and cancelling liquor tax certificates.

P. W. Cullinan, for petitioner.

Hirsh *&*Rasquin, for respondent.

Dickey, J.

The Liquor Tax Law is concerned with individuals holding liquor tax certificates as well as the particular place where business is carried on.

While the law permits one person to hold certificates for-different places without number, as I interpret the law, the violation by that individual of any of the provisions of the law will forfeit all tax certificates held by him wherever the premises are situate. It is meant to be drastic in its operations against violators of its provisions so that any offender loses all his rights to traffic in liquors anywhere.

I do not think it objectionable in one proceeding to join several places where certificates are held by the same person. There is no provision in the law forbidding it and the law fairly contemplates it. By section 42 it provides that two or more penalties may be sued for and recovered in the same action.

Ordered accordingly.
# C_2021234EN.01000901.xml

| 17.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/9

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 234/08)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 26 March 2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 86598 |
| Decision No | 023/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Iceland |
| Title | Aid to Farice ehf. for investment in a third submarine cable |
| Legal basis | Parliamentary resolution No 31/149 approving the Government’s Telecommunications Policy, and parliamentary approval of the state budget to finance the project with public funds |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | To enhance security and reduce vulnerability of international connectivity to and from Iceland, as well as shortening the digital distance between Iceland and Europe |
| Form of aid | Share capital increase |
| Budget | Estimated EUR 50 million |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Economic sectors | International connectivity services |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs |
| Arnarhvoli |
| 101 Reykjavik |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

26 March 2021

Case No

86598

Decision No

023/21/COL

EFTA State

Iceland

Title

Aid to Farice ehf. for investment in a third submarine cable

Legal basis

Parliamentary resolution No 31/149 approving the Government’s Telecommunications Policy, and parliamentary approval of the state budget to finance the project with public funds

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

To enhance security and reduce vulnerability of international connectivity to and from Iceland, as well as shortening the digital distance between Iceland and Europe

Form of aid

Share capital increase

Budget

Estimated EUR 50 million

Intensity

100 %

Economic sectors

International connectivity services

Name and address of the granting authority

The Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs

Arnarhvoli

101 Reykjavik

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
#### § 41.92 Examples.

The examples in appendix J and supplement A to appendix J are not exclusive. Compliance with an example, to the extent applicable, constitutes compliance with this subpart. Examples in a paragraph illustrate only the issue described in the paragraph and do not illustrate any other issue that may arise in this subpart.

[79 FR 28401, May 16, 2014]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 27, 2009 

0120 

Order 

 

January 27, 2009 

137352 

PROTECTIVE PLANNING GROUP, LLC, 

And ESTATE PLANNING INSTITUTE 

OF MICHIGAN, LLC, 

Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/ 

Appellants, 

v SC: 137352 

 COA: 283532 

Oakland CC: 2007-080269-CK 

CINDY LEONARD, 

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/ 

Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellee, 

v 

STEWART MILLER, 

Third-Party Defendant/Appellant, 

and 

JAY MELODY and KAY CRANDALL, 

Third-Party Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 13, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        MAY-31-1995                  NOV-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                           JUN-01-1995                  SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                             NOV-30-1995                  NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                         497,611                      486,615
<SECURITIES>                                         0                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  245,283                      458,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                            0
<INVENTORY>                                    258,651                      273,440
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,011,344                    1,220,806
<PP&E>                                          40,253                       30,944
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,104,737                    1,335,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          175,190                      435,363
<BONDS>                                              0                            0
<COMMON>                                     2,383,385                    2,383,385
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                            0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,104,737                    1,335,069
<SALES>                                      1,401,139                      613,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,401,139                      613,718
<CGS>                                        1,046,945                      460,495
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,046,945                      460,495
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,061)                     (51,701)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,861)                     (51,701)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                            0
<CHANGES>                                            0                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,861)                     (51,701)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)                       (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                            0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                                   BIG 5 CORP.

                 RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION
                          (DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               -------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                1997           1998           1999           2000           2001
                                                               -------        -------        -------        -------        -------
<S>                                                            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
I. EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES:
       Earnings:
           Pre-tax income from continuing operations           $13,899        $11,369        $14,699        $23,738        $27,048
           Add fixed charges                                    21,085         28,538         27,787         28,315         27,588
                                                               -------        -------        -------        -------        -------

       EARNINGS                                                 34,984         39,907         42,486         52,053         54,636
                                                               -------        -------        -------        -------        -------

       Fixed charges:
           Net interest expense per financial statement         12,442         19,285         17,461         17,035         15,541
           Add:
               Interest income                                       0              0            606            736            858
               Rents (1/3)                                       8,643          9,253          9,720         10,544         11,189
                                                               -------        -------        -------        -------        -------

       FIXED CHARGES                                            21,085         28,538         27,787         28,315         27,588

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                 1.7            1.4            1.5            1.8            2.0

DEFICIENCY IN EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
</TABLE>
§ 308.128 Grounds for cease-and-desist orders. ( a ) *General rule.* The Board of Directors or its designee may issue and have served upon any insured nonmember bank or an institution-affiliated party a notice, as set forth in § 308.18 of the Uniform Rules for practices and violations as described in § 308.127.
( b ) *Extraterritorial acts of foreign banks.* An act, violation or practice committed outside the United States by a foreign bank or an institution-affiliated party that would otherwise be a ground for issuing a cease-and-desist order under paragraph (a) of this section or a temporary cease-and-desist order under § 308.131 of this subpart, shall be a ground for an order if the Board of Directors or its designee finds that: ( 1 ) The act, violation or practice has been, is, or is likely to be a cause of, or carried on in connection with or in furtherance of, an act, violation or practice committed within any state, territory, or possession of the United States or the District of Columbia which act, violation or practice, in and of itself, would be an appropriate basis for action by the FDIC; or
( 2 ) The act, violation or practice, if proven, would adversely affect the insurance risk of the FDIC.