alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
**Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

I, Douglas  Larson,  CEO of Eldorado  Artesian  Springs,  Inc. (the  "Company"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
     ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of
     section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and;

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 6, 2003

                                                /s/Douglas Larson
                                                Douglas Larson
                                                CEO

Subscribed and sworn to be this 6th day of August 2003.

State of Colorado, County of Boulder

/s/Jenni L. Seroogy
Jenni L. Seroogy

My commission expires: 4-18-03
```
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19807-8 Filed:01/18/22 Entered:01/18/22 13:06:57 Desc:

Exhibit Exhibit 8 Parking Rent Invoice Page 1 of 1
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11906 and #11907]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the Commonwealth of Kentucky dated 10/09/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe storms and flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         09/25/2009 through 09/26/2009 *Effective Date:*
                         10/09/2009 *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/08/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/07/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Jessamine. *Contiguous Counties:* Kentucky: Fayette, Garrard, Madison, Mercer,  Woodford. The Interest Rates are: PercentHomeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.500Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.750Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 119066 and for economic injury is 119070. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Kentucky. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: October 9, 2009. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. E9-25058 Filed 10-16-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 24 (Friday, February 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6300-6301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2500]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as a Commercial Gauger

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as a commercial 
gauger.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, 
Intertek USA, Inc., 3741 Red Bluff Road Suite 105, Pasadena, TX 77503, 
has been approved to gauge petroleum, petroleum products, organic 
chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with 
the provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity 
to conduct gauger services should request and receive written 
assurances from the entity that it is approved by the U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection to conduct the specific gauger service requested. 
Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific gauger service this 
entity is approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be 
sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5d3e3f2d73313c3f352c1d39352e733a322b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94f7f6e4baf8f5f6fce5d4f0fce7baf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below 
for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited 
laboratories.
    http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as commercial gauger became 
effective on November 07, 2008. The next triennial inspection date will 
be scheduled for November 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randall Breaux, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania

[[Page 6301]]

Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

    Dated: January 29, 2009.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. E9-2500 Filed 2-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Editorial Note on Part 45
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 45 appear at 80 FR 74898, 74910, Nov. 30, 2015.

§ 45.7 Segregation of collateral. ( a ) A covered swap entity that posts any collateral other than for variation margin with respect to a non-cleared swap or a non-cleared security-based swap shall require that all funds or other property other than variation margin provided by the covered swap entity be held by one or more custodians that are not the covered swap entity or counterparty and not affiliates of the covered swap entity or the counterparty.
( b ) A covered swap entity that collects initial margin required by § 45.3(a) with respect to a non-cleared swap or a non-cleared security-based swap shall require that such initial margin be held by one or more custodians that are not the covered swap entity or counterparty and not affiliates of the covered swap entity or the counterparty.
( c ) For purposes of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the custodian must act pursuant to a custody agreement that: ( 1 ) Prohibits the custodian from rehypothecating, repledging, reusing, or otherwise transferring (through securities lending, securities borrowing, repurchase agreement, reverse repurchase agreement or other means) the collateral held by the custodian, except that cash collateral may be held in a general deposit account with the custodian if the funds in the account are used to purchase an asset described in § 45.6(a)(2) or (b), such asset is held in compliance with this § 45.7, and such purchase takes place within a time period reasonably necessary to consummate such purchase after the cash collateral is posted as initial margin; and
( 2 ) Is a legal, valid, binding, and enforceable agreement under the laws of all relevant jurisdictions, including in the event of bankruptcy, insolvency, or a similar proceeding.
( d ) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(1) of this section, a custody agreement may permit the posting party to substitute or direct any reinvestment of posted collateral held by the custodian, provided that, with respect to collateral collected by a covered swap entity pursuant to § 45.3(a) or posted by a covered swap entity pursuant to § 45.3(b), the agreement requires the posting party to: ( 1 ) Substitute only funds or other property that would qualify as eligible collateral under § 45.6, and for which the amount net of applicable discounts described in appendix B of this part would be sufficient to meet the requirements of § 45.3; and
( 2 ) Direct reinvestment of funds only in assets that would qualify as eligible collateral under § 45.6, and for which the amount net of applicable discounts described in appendix B of this part would be sufficient to meet the requirements of § 45.3.
# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of The State ofConnecticut and Pfizer Inc. ) ) ) ) ) Trading Agreement and Order 8136A Modification No.2

Whereas, the Commissioner ofEnvironmental Protection ("Commissioner") and PfizerInc. ("Respondent") having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and Order 8136A and all previous modifications thereto, do now, by mutual agreement, further modify said modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows: 1. All references to May 1,2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits andNOx allowances to comply with the emissions limits ofSubsections 22a-174-22(d)(1) through 22a-174- 22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations ofConnecticut State Agencies ("Regulations") are hereby replaced with May I, 2010. 2. Any references to October 1st with respectto the date by which the Respondents shall estimate and acquire Discrete Emissions Reduction Credits ("DERCS") and/or allowances for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009. 3. Any references to May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 with respect to calculation and retirement ofnon-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 31,2009 and May 31, 2010. 4. All references to September I, 2008 with respectto the submission ofFuture Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September I, 2009. 5. No laterthan May 1,2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading Agreement and Order 8136A and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent shall comply with the requirements ofSections 22a-174-22(d)(l) and 22a-174-22(d)(2)(A) of the Regulations. 6. All other terms and conditions ofTrading Agreement and Order 8136A, as modified, shall remain in effect.

( Printed on Recycled Paper) 79 Elm Street • Hartford, CT 06106 - 5127 An Equal 0pp0rlun;ty EmployerPfizer Inc. 2 Trading Agreement and Order 8136A Modification NO.2 The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement and Orderwithout further notice. Pfizer Inc. Signature:

# !2-.h
...**tZ~** AL Name:
...

# ,.e,._ 4' )f"<K;,,v.fe) 

# FE Title:

### ~cv·I"lVe- lJ/(??cfz,c Date: 

# A,¢ r, 

# ! /..q I 

### '2- "0

## '7 7 ;;
Issued as a modification ofa Trading Agreement and Order.

### Ga_~l'oser\ Direc or V Engineering and Enforcement Division Bureau ofAirManagement Date



### ,
Exhibit 99.1




				Exhibit 99(i)

		 	   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
			       18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Datascension Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB  for the quarter ended September 30, 2004  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  Murray N. Conradie, Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted  pursuant to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies  with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results of  operations  of  the
Company.

                                     /s/ Murray N. Conradie
                                     ------------------------------------------

                                    MURRAY N. CONRADIE, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 3, 2004
EXHIBIT A

Schedule of Claims Subject to the Four Hundred Fifty-Second Omnibus Objection 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22512-1 Filed:10/05/22 Entered:10/05/22 10:39:46 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 2
Four Hundred Fifty-Second Omnibus Objection

Exhibit A - Claims to Be Disallowed

NAME DATE FILED DEBTOR CLAIM #

ASSERTED CLAIM 

CASE NUMBER AMOUNT

04/01/2022 17 BK 03567-LTS Puerto Rico Highways and 179756 $33,000.00*

Transportation Authority

 1 COLON-AVILES, RICARDO

LCDO. FRANCISCO R. GONZÁLEZ COLÓN

USDC 116410

1519 PONCE DE LEÓN 805, SANTURCE

SAN JUAN, PR 00909

Reason: Proof of claim was not timely filed, as claimant filed the claim after the applicable deadline set by the Bar Date Orders.

 2 MARCANO, VICTOR SANTIAGO 10/26/2021 17 BK 03283-LTS Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 179669 $60,000.00*

HC 03 BOX 6825

JUNCOS, PR 00777

Reason: Proof of claim was not timely filed, as claimant filed the claim after the applicable deadline set by the Bar Date Orders.

TOTAL $93,000.00*

*Indicates claim contains unliquidated and/or undetermined amounts 1

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22512-1 Filed:10/05/22 Entered:10/05/22 10:39:46 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 2 of 2
#### § 408.6 Typical classes of action.

(a) Section 1507.3(c)(2) of the NEPA Regulations in conjunction with § 1508.4 thereof requires agencies to establish three typical classes of action for similar treatment under NEPA. These typical classes of action are set forth below:

| Actions normally requiring EIS's | Actions normally requiring assessments but not necessarily EIS's | Actions normally not requiring assessments or EIS's |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | Applications for Eximbank financing under the direct lending program in support of transactions for which determinations under § 408.4(b)(1)(i) and (ii) above may be affirmative | Applications for Eximbank financing in the form of insurance or guarantees. |

(b) Eximbank will independently determine whether an EIS or an environmental assessment is required where:

(1) A proposal for agency action is not covered by one of the typical classes of action above; or

(2) For actions which are covered, the presence of extraordinary circumstances indicates that some other level of environmental review may be appropriate.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT (4)(G)

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                      CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY FINANCING V

         The undersigned, constituting all of the trustees of Consumers Energy
Company Financing V, desiring to form a business trust pursuant to the Delaware
Business Trust Act, 12 Del. C. Section 3801, et seq., hereby certify as follows:

         (a)       Name. The name of the business trust being formed hereby (the
                   "Trust") is "Consumers Energy Company Financing V."

         (b)       Delaware Trustee. The Name and business address of the
                   trustee of the Trust which has its principal place of
                   business in the State of Delaware are as follows:

                   The Bank of New York (Delaware)
                   White Clay Center, Route 273
                   Newark, Delaware  19711

         (c)       Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
                   as of the date of filing with the Secretary of State of the
                   State of Delaware.

Dated:  June 6, 2001

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the Trustees of the Trust,
have executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first above written.


                                      /s/Alan M. Wright
                                     Alan M. Wright, as Regular Trustee


                                      /s/Thomas A. McNish
                                     Thomas A. McNish, as Regular Trustee



                                     The Bank of New York (Delaware), as
                                                Delaware Trustee


                                     By: /s/Michael Santino
                                        Name:  Michael Santino
                                        Title: SVP
#### BONEWITZ et al. v. HOME OWNERS LOAN CORPORATION.

No. 30655.

Dec. 22, 1942.

*132 P. 2d 644.*

H. B. Lockett, of Duncan, for plaintiffs in error.

Virgil O. Martin, of Duncan, for defendant in error.

HURST, J.

This is an unlawful detainer action commenced in the justice court. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Home Owners Loan Corporation, the defendants, C. E. Bonewitz and Margaret C. Bonewitz, appealed by bill of exceptions. The district court, on ap*655peal, affirmed the judgment of the justice court. Defendants appeal.

Defendants contend that proof ‘of service of notice to terminate tenancy for nonpayment of rent and proof of service of the three-day notice to vacate before filing the action was not properly made. We agree with this- contention. Over the objections of the defendants the two notices, with affidavits of W. J. Cormack showing service attached thereto, were introduced in evidence. Cormack also orally testified that he “served papers” on the defendants, but he did not identify the papers or testify as to what papers were served.

The terms of the agreement under which the defendants were in possession as tenants are not given in the record. Plaintiff does not contend that the case comes under the provisions of 41 O. S. 1941 § 8 so as to render the service of notice to terminate tenancy unnecessary. We assume, therefore, that the service of such a notice was necessary as provided in 41 O. S. 1941 §§ 4-7.

Service of the three-day notice as required by 39 O. S. 1941 § 395 is jurisdictional, and must be proved at the trial unless proof is waived. Sparks v. Calloway, 183 Okla. 332, 82 P. 2d 830.

Proof of the service of each of said notices must be made by competent evidence unless such proof is waived. Here, according to the record, the defendants objected to the introduction of the affidavits showing service attached to the notices. Said notices are not “notice or other process in an action” of which proof of service may be made by affidavit as provided in 12 O. S. 1941 § 431, over the objection of the opposite party. Tankersley v. Castanien, 63 Okla. 18, 162 P. 191; 26 C. J. 860.

We conclude that the justice court committed error in admitting in evidence the affidavit showing service of such notices, and the testimony was not sufficient to show service of the same. The district court committed reversible error in affirming the judgments.

Reversed, with directions to proceed in accordance with the views herein expressed.

WELCH, C. J., CORN, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, GIBSON, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. RILEY and ARNOLD, JJ., absent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Financial Data Schedule for Adelphia Communications Corp. for the six
months ended September 30, 1997
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000796486
<NAME> ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         206,078
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,345<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,404,072<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,022,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,766,783
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           306
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,214,568)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,022,371
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               251,634
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  191,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (127,978)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (79,887)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       295
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (80,182)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,300
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (77,882)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.84)
<FN>
<F2>PP&E NETTED WITH DEPRECIATION
<F1>RECEIVABLES NETTED WITH ALLOWANCE
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 252.31 Applicability. ( a ) *Applicability* — ( 1 ) *Initial applicability.* Subject to paragraph (c) of this section, a bank holding company must comply with the risk-management and risk-committee requirements set forth in § 252.33 and the liquidity risk-management and liquidity stress test requirements set forth in §§ 252.34 and 252.35 no later than the first day of the fifth quarter following the date on which its average total consolidated assets equal or exceed $100 billion.
( 2 ) *Changes in requirements following a change in category.* A bank holding company with average total consolidated assets of $100 billion or more that changes from one category of banking organization described in § 252.5(b) through (e) to another of such categories must comply with the requirements applicable to the new category no later than on the first day of the second quarter following the change in the bank holding company's category.
( b ) *Cessation of requirements.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, a bank holding company is subject to the risk-management and risk committee requirements set forth in § 252.33 and the liquidity risk-management and liquidity stress test requirements set forth in §§ 252.34 and 252.35 until its total consolidated assets are below $100 billion for each of four consecutive calendar quarters.
( c ) *Applicability for bank holding companies that are subsidiaries of foreign banking organizations.* If a bank holding company that has average total consolidated assets of $100 billion or more is controlled by a foreign banking organization, the U.S. intermediate holding company established or designated by the foreign banking organization must comply with the risk-management and risk committee requirements set forth in § 252.153(e)(3) and the liquidity risk-management and liquidity stress test requirements set forth in § 252.153(e)(4).
[84 FR 59103, Nov. 1, 2019]