alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1266
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1266 appear at 75 FR 76622, Dec. 9, 2010.

§ 1266.2 Authorization and application for advances; obligation to repay advances. ( a ) *Application for advances.* A Bank may accept oral or written applications for advances from its members.
( b ) *Obligation to repay advances.* ( 1 ) A Bank shall require any member to which an advance is made to enter into a primary and unconditional obligation to repay such advance and all other indebtedness to the Bank, together with interest and any unpaid costs and expenses in connection therewith, according to the terms under which such advance was made or other indebtedness incurred.
( 2 ) Such obligations shall be evidenced by a written advances agreement that shall be reviewed by the Bank's legal counsel to ensure such agreement is in compliance with applicable law.
( c ) *Secured advances.* ( 1 ) Each Bank shall make only fully secured advances to its members as set forth in the Bank Act, the provisions of this part and policy guidelines established by the FHFA.
( 2 ) The Bank shall execute a written security agreement with each borrowing member which establishes the Bank's security interest in collateral securing advances.
( 3 ) Such written security agreement shall, at a minimum, describe the type of collateral securing the advances and give the Bank a perfectible security interest in the collateral.
( d ) *Form of applications and agreements.* Applications for advances, advances agreements and security agreements shall be in substantially such form as approved by the Bank's board of directors, or a committee thereof specifically authorized by the board of directors to approve such forms.
( e ) *Status of secured lending.* All secured transactions, regardless of the form of the transaction, for money borrowed from a Bank by a member of any Bank shall be considered an advance subject to the requirements of this part.
[58 FR 29469, May 20, 1993, as amended at 64 FR 71278, Dec. 21, 1999; 65 FR 8262, Feb. 18, 2000. Redesignated at 65 FR 44429, July 18, 2000; 67 FR 12851, Mar. 20, 2002; 75 FR 76623, Dec. 9, 2010]
Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:22780-2   Filed:11/02/22   Entered:11/02/22 17:44:58    Desc:Appendix Notice   Page 1 of 2

Case:17-03283-LTS   Doc#:22780-2   Filed:11/02/22   Entered:11/02/22 17:44:58    Desc:Appendix Notice   Page 2 of 2
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3389

AN ACT

To amend the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 to permit Malcolm Baldrige

National Quality Awards to be made to nonprofitorganizations.

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3389

AN ACT

To amend the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act

of 1980 to permit Malcolm Baldrige National Quality

Awards to be made to nonprofit organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3389 EH

1 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

2 Section 17(c)(1) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology

3 Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3711a(c)(1)) is amend4 ed by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(F) Nonprofit organizations.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 3,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3313 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3313

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 7, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit Federal court 
     jurisdiction over questions under the Defense of Marriage Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Marriage Protection Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON JURISDICTION.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 99 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1632. Limitation on jurisdiction
    ``No court created by Act of Congress shall have any jurisdiction, 
and the Supreme Court shall have no appellate jurisdiction, to hear or 
decide any question pertaining to the interpretation of, or the 
validity under the Constitution of, section 1738C or this section.''.
    (b) Amendments to the Table of Sections.--The table of sections at 
the beginning of chapter 99 of title 28, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following new item:

``1632. Limitation on jurisdiction.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            1652
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1659
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              208
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1659
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   201
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        9
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (6)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (6)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (6)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
### IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

201 6 WY 94

April Term, A.D. 201 6

September 28, 2016

DAGOBERTO ONTIVEROS,

Appellant (Defendant),

v.

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee (Plaintiff). S

- 16

- 0127



### O RDER 

### A FFIRMING THE 

### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### ’ S 

### J U DGMENT AND 

### S ENTENCE

[¶ 1 ] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification

that A ppellant has not filed a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant entered an unconditional “no contest” plea to second degree murder

. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6

- 2

- 104. The district court imposed a sentence of 20

to 2 4 years

. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s March 11

, 201 6

,

“ Judgment and Sentence

. ”

[¶ 2] On June 27 , 201 6

, Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate counsel e

- filed a “Motion to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The next day , this Court entered an “Order Granting

Motion for Extens ion of Time to File Pro Se Brief.” This Court ordered that, on or

before August 11 , 201 6 , Appellant “may file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the

issues h e would like this Court to consider in this appeal .” This Court also provided
notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expir ed, this Court would “make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision on this appeal.” This Court later extended the time to file a pro se brief until September 12,

2016. The Court notes that Appellant did not timely file a pro se brief.[¶ 3] Now, f ollowing a careful review of the record and the “ Anders brief” submitted by appellate counsel, this Court finds that appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be

gran ted and the district court’s “ Judgment and Sentence ” should be affirmed

. It is,
therefore,

[¶ 4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court

- appointed counsel

for A ppellant, Dagoberto Ontiveros , is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record

for A ppellant; and it is further

[¶ 5 ] ORDERED that the district court’s March 1 1 , 201 6 , “Judgment and Sentence” be, and the same hereby is , affirmed.

[¶6] DATED this 2 8 th day of September , 201 6

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

E. J A MES BUR KE

Chief Justice
§ 603.300 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part is published by the Farm Credit Administration pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. 552a) which requires each Federal agency to promulgate rules to establish procedures for notification and disclosure to an individual of agency records pertaining to that person, and for review of such records.
( b ) The records covered by this part include: ( 1 ) Personnel and employment records maintained by the Farm Credit Administration which are not covered by §§ 293.101 through 293.108 of the regulations of the Office of Personnel Management (5 CFR 293.101 through 293.108), and
( 2 ) Other records contained in record systems maintained by the Farm Credit Administration.
[40 FR 40454, Sept. 2, 1975, as amended at 51 FR 41941, Nov. 20, 1986]
EXHIBIT 4.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                            CORNELL CORRECTIONS, INC.

      Cornell  Corrections,  Inc., a corporation  organized and existing under
and by virtue of the General  Corporation  Law of the State of  Delaware  (the
"CORPORATION"), does hereby certify as follows:

      1. The amendment to the Corporation's Restated Certificate of
Incorporation set forth below was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions
of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and has
been consented to and authorized by the holders of at least a majority of the
outstanding capital stock entitled to vote thereon at a duly called meeting of
the stockholders of the Corporation held on May 25, 2000.

      2.    Article  First  of  the  Corporation's   Restated  Certificate  of
Incorporation is amended to read as follows:

            "The name of the Corporation is Cornell Companies, Inc. (the
      "Corporation")."

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed this 25th day of May, 2000.

                                                /S/ JOHN L. HENDRIX
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John L. Hendrix, Chief Financial Officer


Acknowledged by:


         /s/ KEVIN B. KELLY
----------------------------------------
      Kevin B. Kelly, Secretary
#### § 615.5354 Enforcement.

An institution that does not have or maintain the minimum capital ratios applicable to it, whether required in subpart H of this part or part 628 of this chapter, in a decision pursuant to this subpart, in a written agreement or temporary or final order under part C of title V of the Act, or in a condition for approval of an application, or an institution that has failed to submit or comply with an acceptable plan to attain those ratios, will be subject to such administrative action or sanctions as the Farm Credit Administration considers appropriate. These sanctions may include the issuance of a capital directive pursuant to subpart M of this part or other enforcement action, assessment of civil money penalties, and/or the denial or condition of applications.

[81 FR 49778, July 28, 2016]
§ 6.23 Decision and issuance of a prompt corrective action directive. ( a ) *OCC consideration of response.* After considering the response, the OCC may: ( 1 ) Issue the directive as proposed or in modified form;
( 2 ) Determine not to issue the directive and so notify the national bank or Federal savings association; or
( 3 ) Seek additional information or clarification of the response from the national bank or Federal savings association, or any other relevant source.
( b ) [Reserved]
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
January 14 1997
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-96212 of Sanctuary Woods Multimedia Corporation on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement No. 33-95464 of Sanctuary Woods Multimedia Corporation on Form S-3 of
our report dated February 9, 1994, except for comments above on reconciling
differences between Canadian and United States generally accepted accounting
principles which are as of September 20, 1995, appearing in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A-3 of Sanctuary Woods Multimedia Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1995.
 
Very truly yours,
 
CHAMBERS, PHILIPS & CO.
 
Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, British Columbia
<PAGE>
                                                               Exhibit 10.4

            THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE DEFERRED COMPENSATION AGREEMENT

                             DATED APRIL 25, 1996

         THIS AMENDMENT is dated as of April 27, 2001, and is by and between
the SOUTHSIDE BANCSHARES CORP., a Missouri corporation located in St. Louis
Missouri (the "Company") and THOMAS M. TESCHNER (the "Employee").

         RECITALS:

         1.       On April 25, 1996, the Employee and the Company entered
                  into a certain Deferred Compensation Agreement (the
                  "Agreement").

         2.       The Company and the Employee agree that it is in the best
                  interests of each party to amend the Agreement as provided
                  below.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is amended as follows with respect to
years beginning on and after January 1, 2001:

         1.       The first paragraph of Section 2 of the Agreement is amended
                  to read as follows.

                  "2. Grant of Awards. As of the date of this Agreement, an
                      ---------------
                  initial grant of 6,518 shares of Performance Stock, having
                  a value on the date of grant of $104,288.00 is hereby
                  credited to Employee's Performance Stock Account. For each
                  calendar year after 1995 during the term of this Agreement
                  (including any year in which a Change in Control shall
                  occur), Employee will be granted (as of the last business
                  day of each such year which in the event of a Change in
                  Control shall be the date of the Change in Control) such
                  number of whole and/or fractional shares of Performance
                  Stock, at a deemed value of the bid price of the Company's
                  publicly traded common stock on the last trading day of the
                  Plan Year (which in the event of a Change in Control shall
                  be the date of the Change in Control) in the case of 2.a.
                  and 2.b. and Five Dollars and Thirty Three Cents ($5.33)
                  per share in the case of 2.c., as shall have a value equal
                  to the sum of:"

         IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE, Employee has executed this Second Amendment
and the Company has caused its duly authorized officers to execute this
Second Amendment.

Employee:                                  Company:

THOMAS M. TESCHNER                         SOUTHSIDE BANCSHARES CORP.


/s/ Thomas M. Teschner                     /s/ Norville K. McClain
------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
Thomas M. Teschner                         Its Director
                                              ---------------------------------
§ 53.4 Bank service provider notification. ( a ) A bank service provider is required to notify at least one bank-designated point of contact at each affected banking organization customer as soon as possible when the bank service provider determines that it has experienced a computer-security incident that has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, covered services provided to such banking organization for four or more hours. ( 1 ) A bank-designated point of contact is an email address, phone number, or any other contact(s), previously provided to the bank service provider by the banking organization customer.
( 2 ) If the banking organization customer has not previously provided a bank-designated point of contact, such notification shall be made to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Information Officer of the banking organization customer, or two individuals of comparable responsibilities, through any reasonable means.
( b ) The notification requirement in paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to any scheduled maintenance, testing, or software update previously communicated to a banking organization customer.
# Exhibit A

USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 1 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 2 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 3 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 4 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 5 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 6 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 7 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 8 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 9 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 10 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 11 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 12 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 13 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 14 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 15 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 16 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 17 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 18 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 19 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 20 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 21 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 22 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 23 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 24 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 25 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 26 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 27 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 28 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 29 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 30 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 31 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 32 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 33 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 34 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 35 of 36USCA Case #12-1260 Document #1489074 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page 36 of 36
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) I, William A. Haseltine, Ph.D., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer) of Human Genome Sciences, Inc. (the Registrant), certify,
to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 of the Registrant (the Report),
that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. /s/ William A. Haseltine, Ph.D.Name: William A. Haseltine, Ph.D
Date: March 12, 2004
#### L. W. Doolittle, as Sheriff of Brevard County, Florida, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Claude N. Wilson, a Married Woman, by Her Nest Friend, Harold G. Wilson, *Defendant in Error.*

Decision Filed May 8, 1923.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Brevard County; James W. Perkins, Judge.

*M. B. Smith,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*L. B. Newman,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given, in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, *485considered, ordered and adjudged by tbe court tbat tbe said judgment of tbe Circuit Court be, and tbe same is hereby, affirmed.

All concur.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 18, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Ford on April 14, 2011

FROM: Don Kopinski

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on April 14, 2011 between Ford and EPA staff. 

The following people attended:

Ford: Cynthia Wiliams, Ken McAlinden, Alyssa Werthman, Satish Atluri, Bob Thomas, 

Will Ruona

EPA: Byron Bunker, Tony Fernandez., Angela Cullen, Cle Jackson, Bob Peavyhouse, 

Don Kopinski

The discussion focused on analytically derived CO2, off-cycle credits for vocational vehicles, 

vocational vehicle tire requirements, and certification of incomplete vehicles with no complete 

sister vehicle.