alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 725

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 725 appear at 84 FR 1608, Feb. 5, 2019.

#### § 725.1 Scope.

This part contains the regulations implementing the National Credit Union Central Liquidity Facility Act, subchapter III of the Federal Credit Union Act. The National Credit Union Administration Central Liquidity Facility is a mixed-ownership Government corporation within the National Credit Union Administration. It is managed by the National Credit Union Administration Board and is owned by its member credit unions. The purpose of the Facility is to improve the general financial stability of credit unions by meeting their liquidity needs and thereby encourage savings, support consumer and mortgage lending and provide basic financial resources to all segments of the economy.
January 6, 2015

Mr. Michael H. LaMee Chief of Training & Standardization

Med

- Trans Corporation 209 State Highway 121 Bypass Lewisville, TX 75067

Dear Mr. LeMee :

Th is is in response to your March 19, 2015

, letter sent to the public docket ( No. FAA

- 2015

- 0726 ) petitioni ng the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf Med

- Trans Corporation (MTC) for an exemption from § 43.3(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR)

. That exemption, if granted, would allow MTC properly trained medical personnel to perform

the i nsertion and removal of litter systems, isolettes, and secondary stretcher systems (all of

which are addressed in each aircraft ’ s EMS Rotorcraft Flight Manual Supplement) in the EC

135 and EC

- 155 aircraft operated by MTC

.

The FAA has determined that the i nsertion and removal of litter systems, isolettes

, and secondary stretcher systems does not fit the definition of a maintenance activity in this case. These systems are designed in such a way that only the mounting system is permanently

attached to the air craft. The litters, isolettes, and stretchers are not permanently attached to the aircraft, but rather designed to be removable and interchangeable without the use of tools, much like a Portable Electronic Device (PED). These different configurations are a ll approved as part of the original design and included in the approved flight manual supplement.

The FAA finds that an exemption to § 43.3(a) is not needed because the insertion and removal of litter systems, isolettes, and secondary stretcher systems d oes not fit the definition

of a m aintenance activity

.

Because the relief you seek is not required, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service
Order filed November 20, 2012. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00533-CV

____________

JASON D. KRAUS, Appellant

V.

TZACHAR HARARI, Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-70930

O R D E R

The parties notified this court on August 9, 2012 that the case had settled. As of 

today’s date the parties have not filed a dispositive motion. 

Unless appellant submits a brief, or the parties submit a dispositive motion to the 

clerk of this court on or before December 20, 2012, the court will dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM