alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3334

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the design and 

construction of the Riverside-Corona Feeder in cooperation with the 

Western Municipal Water District of Riverside, California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 17, 2003

Mr. CALVERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate 

in the design and construction of the Riverside-Corona 

Feeder in cooperation with the Western Municipal Water 

District of Riverside, California.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Riverside-Corona 

5 Feeder Authorization Act’’. 
2

•HR 3334 IH 

1 SEC. 2. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE RIVERSIDE2 CORONA FEEDER. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior, in 

4 cooperation with the Western Municipal Water District, 

5 may participate in a project to design and construct a 

6 water supply project, the Riverside-Corona Feeder, which 

7 includes 20 ground water wells and 28 miles of pipeline 

8 in western Riverside County, California. 

9 (b) AGREEMENTS AND REGULATIONS.—The Sec10 retary may enter into such agreements and promulgate 

11 such regulations as are necessary to carry out this section. 

12 (c) COST SHARING.—The Federal share of the cost 

13 to design and construct the project described in subsection 

14 (a) shall not exceed greater of—

15 (1) 35 percent of the total cost of the project; 

16 or 

17 (2) $50,000,000. 

18 (d) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary 

19 under this section shall not be used for operation or main20 tenance of the project described in subsection (a).

Æ
§ 611.1220 Termination resolution. No more than 1 week before you submit your plan of termination to us, your board of directors must adopt a termination resolution stating its support for terminating your status as a System institution and authorizing: ( a ) Submission to us of a plan of termination and other required submissions that comply with § 611.1223; and
( b ) Submission of the plan of termination to the voting stockholders if we approve the plan of termination under § 611.1230 or, if we take no action, after the end of our approval period.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Space electrochemical researchand technology (SERT)**

 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.55:

Item Number:0830-H-10 (MF)
CGP systemNumber:000349280
 
1989 | 1991 | 1993
 
March 5, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                    $ 6,124,680
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,935,134
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            8,407,344
<PP&E>                                     19,952,218
<DEPRECIATION>                             11,282,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             17,450,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       4,267,414
<BONDS>                                     1,054,022
<COMMON>                                   13,621,276
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,127,570)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               17,450,328
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            8,041,348
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               8,794,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              132,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (885,257)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  117,813
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,003,070)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,003,070)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.25)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
(This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K
 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements).
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                   2,123,595
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                           71,332,575 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                            114,860,634
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       211,786,087
<PP&E>                                  69,273,805 <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         295,350,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   63,660,850
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   644,504
<OTHER-SE>                             230,323,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           295,350,746
<SALES>                                595,664,088
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       595,664,088
<CGS>                                  258,777,119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          258,777,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       243,549,726
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         326,809
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         95,776,122
<INCOME-TAX>                            35,713,760
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     60,062,362
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            60,062,362
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.88

<FN>
F1 - Net of allowance.
F2 - Net of accumulated depreciation.
</FN>

</TABLE>
§ 625.6 Rulemaking on maximum rates for attorney fees. ( a ) If warranted by an increase in the cost of living or by special circumstances (such as limited availability of attorneys qualified to handle certain types of proceedings), the FCA may adopt regulations providing that attorney fees may be awarded at a rate higher than $75 per hour in some or all of the types of proceedings covered by this part. The FCA will conduct any rulemaking proceedings for this purpose under the informal rulemaking procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act.
( b ) Any person may file with the FCA a petition for rulemaking to increase the maximum rate for attorney fees. The petition should identify the rate the petitioner believes the FCA should establish and the types of proceedings in which the rate should be used. It should also explain fully the reasons why the higher rate is warranted. The FCA will respond to the petition within 90 days after it is filed, by initiating a rulemaking proceeding, denying the petition, or taking other appropriate action.
GOVERNMENTOFTHEDISTRICTOFCOLUMBIADistrictDepartmentoftheEnvironment***OfficeoftheDirectorOCT82011October27,2011OPICEOFREREGIONIIIShawnM.GarvinONALADMINISTRATORegionalAdministratorU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyRE’-’RegionIII(MailCode:3RAOO)1650ArchStreetOCT27.3;iPhiladelphia,PA19103-2029LJJVISIQflDire.Subject:WithdrawalandRe-SubmittaloftheDistrictofColumbia’sRegionalHazeStateImplementationPlanDearMr.Garvin:OnSeptember21,2010,theDistrictofColumbiasubmittedtherequiredelementsofaStateImplementationPlan(SIP)revisiontoaddressRegionalHaze,asrequiredbytheCleanAirAct.TheDistrictisherebywithdrawingtheSeptember21,2010,SIPrevisioninitsentiretyandsubmittinganewSIPrevisiontoaddressRegionalHaze.PursuanttotheauthoritysetforthintheDistrictofColumbiaAirPollutionControlActof1984(“theAct”),Mayor’sOrder98-44,effectiveApril10,1998,andMayor’sOrder2006-61,effectiveJune14,2006,theDistrictofColumbiaisherebyrequestingapprovalofitsSIPrevisionpertainingtoRegionalHaze.Thefollowingareattached:•TwohardcopiesoftheSIPnarrative;•Thepublichearingnoticeandaffidavitofpublication;•Thehearingofficer’scertification;and•TwoCDscontaininganelectronicversionoftheentireSIPrevision,theSIPrevision’sappendices,andpubliccommentsreceived.TheelectronicversionincludesanexactduplicateofthepapercopyoftheSIPrevisionsubmittal.TheSIPrevisionsubmittalincludesconditionIII.a.2.D.ComplianceWithRequirementsforProtectionofVisibilityoftheTitleVOperationPermit!Chapter3Permit,No.026-Ri,forthePotomacPowerResourcesLLC,BenningRoadGeneratingStation.ThisistheonlyconditionofpermitNo.026-RithattheDistrictisrequestingbeconsideredpartofthisSIPrevisiontoaddresstheCleanAirAct’srequirementsforRegionalHaze.ThisplanisalsobeingsubmittedforpurposesofmeetingtheDistrictofColumbia’srelevantandapplicableobligationsrelatedtovisibilitypursuantto§iiO(a)(2)ofthefederalCleanAirAct,includingbutnotlimitedto§§110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)andii0(a)(2)(J),fortheDistrictofDISTRICTgreenforward*4DEPARTMENT____________________________________________________*OFTHE*ENVIRONMENT1200FirstSt.NE,5thFloor,Washington,DC20002tel:202.535.2600web:ddoe.dc.govColumbia’s

1997 ozone,

1997 PM 25 ,

and 2006

PM 2 . 5 National

Ambient

Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

See memorandum

from William

T. Harnett,

Director,

Air Quality

Policy Division, Office

of Air Quality Planning

and Standards,

U.S.

EPA, entitled “Guidance

for State Implementation

Plan

(SIP) Submissions

to Under 110(a)(l)

and

(2)

for

the 2006 24-Hour

fine Particle

(PM 2 s) National

Ambient

Air Quality Standards (NAAQS),”

dated September

25, 2009. Should

you have

any questions

or require additional information,

please

contact

me

at (202)

535- 26,

Ms.

Ceci

Beall,

sociate Director

for

the

Air Quality Division,

at (202) 535-2626. ncere Director

.G. Tulou Enclosure cc:

Diana

Esher, Director,

Air Protection

Division,

EPA Region

3 Cecily

Beau, Associate

Director,

Air Quality Division,

DDOE
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 29

To convert a temporary judgeship for the district of Nebraska to a permanent 

judgeship, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. BEREUTER (for himself, Mr. TERRY, and Mr. OSBORNE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To convert a temporary judgeship for the district of 

Nebraska to a permanent judgeship, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF 

4 NEBRASKA. 

5 (a) CONVERSION OF TEMPORARY JUDGESHIP TO

6 PERMANENT JUDGESHIP.—The existing district judgeship 

7 for the district of Nebraska authorized by section 203(c) 

8 of the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990 (Public Law 

9 101–650; 28 U.S.C. 133 note) shall, as of the date of the 

10 enactment of this Act, be authorized under section 133 
2

•HR 29 IH 

1 of title 28, United States Code, and the incumbent in that 

2 office shall hold the office under section 133 of title 28, 

3 United States Code (as amended by this Act). 

4 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

5 The table contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United 

6 States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to 

7 Nebraska and inserting the following:

‘‘Nebraska ................................................................................................. 4’’.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 30, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60363

Summary Calendar

LEONARO VASO, also known as Leonard Vaso;

KELA VASO; KATERINA VASO,

Petitioners,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of Orders of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

No. A96 292 404

No. A96 292 405

No. A96 292 406

--------------------

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leonaro Vaso, Kela Vaso, and Katerina Vaso, natives and citizens of Albania, petition for review of the decisions of the Board

of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the decision of the immigration judge (“IJ”) denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture
No. 05-60363

-2-

(“CAT”). They argue that the IJ erroneously determined that

Leonard Vaso’s asylum application was untimely, and they contend

that he was entitled to withholding of removal and relief under the

CAT because he has been persecuted in Albania on account of his

political opinion. 

Because the BIA relied on the IJ’s determination that the asylum application was untimely, we lack jurisdiction to review the

denial of asylum. Cf. Zhu v. Ashcroft, 382 F.3d 521, 528 (5th Cir.

2004)(in which the BIA did not indicate whether it was affirming

the timeliness decision, the merits decision, or both). The record

reveals that Leonard Vaso was subject to harassment that does not

rise to the level of persecution. See Eduard v. Ashcroft, 379 F.3d

182, 188 (5th Cir. 2004). The BIA’s determination affirming the

denial of withholding of removal and relief under the CAT is supported by substantial evidence, and the record does not compel a

contrary conclusion. See Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th

Cir. 2002); Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994).

The petition for review is DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLOROR957000-L62510000-PM000: HAG10-0001]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The plats of survey of the following described lands are scheduled to be officially filed in the Bureau of Land Management Oregon/Washington State Office, Portland, Oregon, 30 days from the date of this publication.

## Willamette Meridian

Oregon

T. 39 S., R. 3 E., accepted September 21, 2009

T. 29 S., R. 12 W., accepted September 25, 2009

T. 27 S., R. 3 W., accepted September 30, 2009

T. 27 S., R. 4 W., accepted September 30, 2009

T. 30 S., R. 8 W., accepted September 30, 2009

Washington

T. 21 N., R. 12 W., accepted September 21, 2009

T. 12 N., R. 17 E., accepted September 28, 2009

# ADDRESSES:

A copy of the plats may be obtained from the Land Office at the Oregon/Washington State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 333 SW. 1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204, upon required payment. A person or party who wishes to protest against a survey must file a notice that they wish to protest (at the above address) with the Oregon/Washington State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oregon.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chief, Branch of Geographic Sciences, Bureau of Land Management, 333 SW. 1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204.

Dated: October 7, 2009.

Fred O'Ferrall,

Branch of Lands and Minerals Resources. 

[FR Doc. E9-24948 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
#### § 371.7 Enforcement actions.

Violating the terms or requirements set forth in this part constitutes a violation of a regulation and subjects the records entity to enforcement actions under Section 8 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1818).
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________ ________________ No. 12

- 13622

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:11

- cv - 00202

- MEF

- SRW

WINDHAM TODD PITTMAN, RHONDA LEE PITTMAN, Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

versus STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUA LTY COMPANY, a Stock Company, Defendant

- Appellee.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama

________________________ (May 20, 2013) Before HULL and A NDERSON, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER, * District Judge.
PER CURIAM:

* Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.

Case: 12-13622 Date Filed: 05/20/2013 Page: 1 of 22 Plaintiffs

- Appellants Windham Todd Pittman and Rhonda Pittman appeal the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Defendant

- Appellee State Farm on the Pittmans’ breach

- of

- contract claim. The Pittmans’ suit arose out of State Farm’s denial of claims made under two insurance policies tha t the Pittmans ha d with State Farm. After reviewing the parties’ briefs and the record, and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to State
Farm largely 1 for the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough and well

r easoned published order dated June 21, 2012

. 2 See Pittman v. State Farm Fire &
Cas. Co. , 868 F. Supp. 2d 1335 (M.D. Ala. 2012).
AFFIRMED .

1 We need not decide whether Alabama law requires an insurance company to prove prejudice in this context. We can assume arguendo , without deciding, that prejudice is required, but we conclude that no reasonable jury could fail to find that P laintiffs’ breach

— their failure to provide the reasonably requested banking and credit card information

— was prejudicial.

2 State Farm and the Pittmans have filed various motions attempting to supplement the record to show that Mr. Pittman has now been ch arged with attempted insurance fraud because a “stolen” diamond was found on him and 56 “stolen” paintings were recovered in a storage unit rented by his alleged girlfriend. Because we affirm the district court’s summary judgment ruling based on the terms of the insurance policies, we need not resolve the motions. Accordingly, all pending motions for leave to file supplemental briefs and record materials are DENIED AS MOOT. Case: 12-13622 Date Filed: 05/20/2013 Page: 2 of 2
#### § 390.300 Note account.

The term *note account* means a note, subject to the right of immediate call, evidencing funds held by depositories electing the note option under applicable United States Treasury Department regulations. Note accounts are not savings accounts or savings deposits.
#### § 313.88 Format of hearing.

The FDIC will have the burden of proof to establish the existence or amount of the debt. Thereafter, if the debtor disputes the existence or amount of the debt, the debtor must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that no debt exists, or that the amount of the debt is incorrect. In addition, the debtor may present evidence that the terms of the repayment schedule are unlawful, would cause a financial hardship to the debtor, or that collection of the debt may not be pursued due to operation of law. The hearing official shall maintain a record of any hearing held under this section. Hearings are not required to be formal, and evidence may be offered without regard to formal rules of evidence. Witnesses who testify in oral hearings shall do so under oath or affirmation.
#### § 341.6 Reports.

Every registration or amendment filed under this section shall constitute a *report* or *application* within the meaning or sections 17, 17A(c), and 32(a) of the Act.