alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1848-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Kansas (FEMA-1848-DR), dated June 24, 2009, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 30, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Michael R. Scott, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Michael L. Karl as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E9-24149 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
§ 26.1 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued under the provisions of the Depository Institution Management Interlocks Act (Interlocks Act) (12 U.S.C. 3201 *et seq.*), as amended, and the OCC's general rulemaking authority for national banks in 12 U.S.C. 93a and Federal savings associations in 12 U.S.C. 1462a and 5412(b)(2)(B).
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of the Interlocks Act and this part is to foster competition by generally prohibiting a management official from serving two nonaffiliated depository organizations in situations where the management interlock likely would have an anticompetitive effect.
( c ) *Scope.* This part applies to management officials of national banks, Federal savings associations, and their affiliates.
[73 FR 22251, Apr. 24, 2008, as amended at 79 FR 28399, May 16, 2014]
----

**EXHIBIT 21.1**

TURBOSONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

| SUBSIDIARIES              |
|---------------------------|
|                      |   |   |
|                      |   |   |
|                      |   |   |
|                      | State of |   |
| Name                      | Incorporation | % Ownership |
|                      |   |   |
| TurboSonic Canada, Inc.   | Canada (Ontario) | 100% |
|                      |   |   |
| TurboSonic Inc.           | Canada (Ontario) | 100% |
|                      |   |   |
| TurboSonic Europe Limited | Ireland | 100% |

 

----
#### Donald Ray JOHNSON *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 73-36

495 S.W. 2d 845

Opinion delivered June 18, 1973

*704
      *James R. Howard,*for appellant.

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., by: *Charles A. Banks,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellant Donald Ray Johnson was found guilty of robbing Bill’s Liquor Store in Little Rock. For reversal he contends the lower court should have granted his motion for a directed verdict because the prosecution failed to prove that the crime was committed in Pulaski County and that the appellant participated in the robbery. He confessed on March 25, 1972, that he participated in a robbery “Last Thursday,” which was the date of the crime. A police officer, testified that appellant denied robbing Bill’s Liquor Store on Eighth Street but admitted to driving the automobile used in the robbery. The jury could have concluded from this evidence that the appellant participated in the crime charged.

As to the claim that the State failed to prove the crime was committed in Pulaski County, see Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-1426 (Repl. 1964), Lyons v. *State,*250 Ark. 920, 467 S.W. 2d 701 (1971) and *Hill*v. *State,*253 Ark. 512, 487 S.W. 2d 624 (1972).

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3270 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3270

To extend the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2003

Ms. Dunn (for herself, Mr. English, Mr. Hayes, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Shimkus, 
Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. LaHood, Mr. McHugh, Mrs. Wilson of New 
 Mexico, Mr. Upton, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Baker, Mr. 
Walden of Oregon, and Mr. Sweeney) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Workers Assistance Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY EXTENDED UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 
              ACT OF 2002.

    (a) In General.--Section 208 of the Temporary Extended Unemployment 
Compensation Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-147; 116 Stat. 30), as amended 
by Public Law 108-1 (117 Stat. 3) and Public Law 108-26 (117 Stat. 
751), is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ``December 31, 2003'' 
        and inserting ``June 30, 2004'';
            (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``December 31, 2003'' 
        and inserting ``June 30, 2004'';
            (3) in subsection (b)(2)--
                    (A) in the heading, by striking ``december 31, 
                2003'' and inserting ``june 30, 2004''; and
                    (B) by striking ``December 31, 2003'' and inserting 
                ``June 30, 2004''; and
            (4) in subsection (b)(3), by striking ``March 31, 2004'' 
        and inserting ``September 30, 2004''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the Temporary Extended 
Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-147; 116 Stat. 
21).
                                 <all>
```
Revised on 5-30-02 based on the new information from the submitter dated May 6, 2002. Changes are in bold. REVISED ENGINEERING REPORT (5-30-02) PMN: 02-0161 ENGINEER: Jon/MAM PV (kg/yr): SUBMITTER: USE: OTHER USES: MSDS: Yes Label: No General Eqp.: chemical gloves(PVC)/goggles and/or face shield/glasses/local exhaust ventilation/mechanical ventilation/other Respirator: wear suitable respirator Health Effects: corrosive/ irritant to skin/eyes/lungs/mucous membrane TLV/PEL (PMN or raw materials): not listed. CRSS: Chemical Category:
VP: < 0.01 torr @25 E C S-H 2 O: >500 g/L and dispersible MW: Phys State:

Consumer Use: SAT (concerns): Ground Water: migration to ground water = slow to negligible Health: 3, inhalation, dermal, potential for splashes to the eyes, drinking water; Eco: 3, All releases to water; PBT: P1B1T2OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2 REVISED ENGINEERING REPORT (5-30-02) Page # 2 PMN: 02-0161 ASSUMPTIONS:
POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEWREVISED ENGINEERING REPORT (5-30-02) Page # 3 PMN: 02-0161 USE: Site/Location: Days/yr: Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, container residue, etc.):
basis:

from: ORREVISED ENGINEERING REPORT (5-30-02) Page # 4 PMN: 02-0161 PROC: (cont.) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE Tot. # of workers: Days/yr: Inhalation: Worst: Typical: Number of workers with inhalation exposure: Basis:

Note:
Dermal: contact with Basis:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3345

To enhance the public safety by rendering aliens ineligible to receive visas 

and ineligible for admission to the United States if their entry poses 

a danger to national security, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 20, 2003

Mr. FLAKE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To enhance the public safety by rendering aliens ineligible 

to receive visas and ineligible for admission to the United 

States if their entry poses a danger to national security, 

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Inadmissiblity of Na5 tional Security Aliens Act’’. 
2

•HR 3345 IH 

1 SEC. 2. INADMISSIBILITY OF PERSONS POSING NATIONAL 

2 SECURITY THREAT. 

3 Section 212(a)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(G) NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT.—Any 

7 alien whose entry or proposed activities in the 

8 United States the Secretary of State or the Sec9 retary of Homeland Security, in consultation 

10 with appropriate heads of other executive 

11 branch agencies, has reason to believe would 

12 pose a danger to the national security (as de13 fined in section 219(c)(2)) is inadmissible.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                                     Canadian Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.3665
<CASH>                                         680,002
<SECURITIES>                                   3,615,703      
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,780,907      
<ALLOWANCES>                                   46,500         
<INVENTORY>                                    681,158        
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,271,437      
<PP&E>                                         513,667        
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0              
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14,203,778     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,535,279      
<BONDS>                                        0              
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    11,523         
<COMMON>                                       150,187        
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,921,347      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14,203,778     
<SALES>                                        4,978,813      
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,978,813      
<CGS>                                          1,683,911      
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,683,911      
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0              
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0              
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0              
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                544,098        
<INCOME-TAX>                                   256,908        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0              
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0              
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0              
<CHANGES>                                      0              
<NET-INCOME>                                   324,965        
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .12            
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .12            
                                                              
                                               

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7270

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DANIEL WAYNE WAMER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District

Judge. (CR-96-984, CA-98-1455-2-11)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Wayne Wamer, Appellant Pro Se. Miller Williams Shealy, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Wayne Wamer seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Wamer, Nos. CR-96-984; CA98-1455-2-11 (D.S.C. Aug. 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

___________________

NO. 09-12-00256-CR 

___________________

ARTHUR JAY GRAY JR. A/K/A ARTHUR JAY GRAY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_________________________________________________________________ _

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12-13328

_________________________________________________________________ _

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Arthur Jay Gray Jr. a/k/a 

Arthur Jay Gray pleaded guilty to felony theft with prior theft convictions. The 

trial court found Gray guilty and assessed punishment at two years of confinement

in a state jail facility and a fine of $1000, then suspended imposition of sentence, 

placed Gray on community supervision for five years, and assessed a fine of 

$1000. The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke Gray’s community 
2

supervision. Gray pleaded “true” to one violation of the terms of the community 

supervision order. The trial court found that Gray violated the terms of the 

community supervision order, revoked Gray’s community supervision, and 

imposed a sentence of two years of confinement in a state jail facility.

Gray’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional 

evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 

S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On October 25, 2012, we granted an 

extension of time for gray to file a pro se brief. We received no response from 

Gray.

We have reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel’s 

conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it 

unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare 

Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial 

court’s judgment.1

AFFIRMED.

 1

Gray may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary 

review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
3

______________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN 

Chief Justice

Submitted on February 6, 2013

Opinion Delivered February 20, 2013

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.
Exhibit 24.6

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

          KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Gabriel B. Thomas, in my
individual capacity and as Director of Unilab Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitute and appoint Mark L. Bibi, Richard
A. Michaelson and/or Brian D. Urban, severally or any one of them acting alone,
from the date hereof until such time as this Power of Attorney is revoked in
writing, to act as my true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact, in my name and
on my behalf to execute, consent to, swear to, acknowledge, record, file, amend
and/or modify and deliver one or more registration statements for the filing of
securities of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act") and any and all subsequent filings made by or on behalf of the
Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
the Securities Act and/or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 10th day of October 1994.

                                                          /s/ Gabriel B. Thomas
                                                          ---------------------
                                                              Gabriel B. Thomas
# C_2017090EN.01000501.xml

| 23.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/5

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2017/C 90/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 15 December 2016 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 79780 |
| Decision No | : | 233/16/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title | : | Enova’s Eco-Inn scheme 2017-2022 |
| Legal basis | : | Parliamentary Decision of 5 April 2001 on the basis of a proposition by the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy of 21 December 2000. The Parliamentary Decision amends the Energy Act of 29 June 1990 No 50 |
| Type of measure | : | Scheme |
| Objective | : | Environmental |
| Form of aid | : | Grants, soft loans, convertible loans, guarantees |
| Budget | : | NOK 1,5 billion annually |
| Intensity | : | 50 % for large enterprises, 60 % for medium-sized enterprises and 70 % for small enterprises. |
| Duration | : | 1.1.2017-31.12.2022 |
| Economic sectors | : | No sector limitations under the scheme |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Enova SF |
| Professor Brochs Gate 2 |
| PO Box 5700 Sluppen |
| N-7437 Trondheim |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

15 December 2016

Case No

Case No

:

79780

Decision No

Decision No

:

233/16/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title

Title

:

Enova’s Eco-Inn scheme 2017-2022

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

Parliamentary Decision of 5 April 2001 on the basis of a proposition by the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy of 21 December 2000. The Parliamentary Decision amends the Energy Act of 29 June 1990 No 50

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Scheme

Objective

Objective

:

Environmental

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Grants, soft loans, convertible loans, guarantees

Budget

Budget

:

NOK 1,5 billion annually

Intensity

Intensity

:

50 % for large enterprises, 60 % for medium-sized enterprises and 70 % for small enterprises.

Duration

Duration

:

1.1.2017-31.12.2022

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

No sector limitations under the scheme

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Enova SF

Professor Brochs Gate 2

PO Box 5700 Sluppen

N-7437 Trondheim

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                     CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-6420) of Petroleum Geo-Services ASA
and in the Prospectuses constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form
F-4 (Registration No. 333-9702) of Petroleum Geo-Services ASA, part of the
Registration Statements on Form F-3 (Registration Nos. 333-9518 and 333-9520) of
Petroleum Geo-Services ASA and part of the Registration Statements on Form F-3
(Registration Nos. 333-10348, 333-10348-01, and 333-10348-02) of Petroleum
Geo-Services ASA, PGS Trust I and PGS Trust II of our report dated February 16,
1999, except as to Note 20, which is as of April 21, 1999, appearing on page F-1
of this Form 20-F/A.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Houston, Texas
November 5, 1999
Exhibit 32


           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Pioneer  Railcorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  we, Guy  L.Brenkman,
President and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and J. Michael Carr,  Chief  Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Guy L. Brenkman                             /s/ J. Michael Carr
-------------------------------------           --------------------------------
Guy L. Brenkman                                 J. Michael Carr
President and Chief Executive Officer           Chief Financial Officer



August 8, 2003


                                       1