alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5

                        [LETTERHEAD OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN]
                             MAR PROFUNDO GIRASSOL
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Form 20-F of our Report dated April 6, 2001 with respect to
the financial statements of Mar Profundo Girassol for the year ended
December 31, 2000, and to the incorporation of such Report into the company's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8, File Nos. 33-85168,
333-09292 and 333-74321.

                                          /s/ FRANCIS SCHNEIDECKER
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          BARBIER FRINAULT & ASSOCIES
                                          Francis Scheidecker

Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
May 29, 2001
•

AVS

Quality Management System

QPM#

AlR-ANM-030-F7

Rcyision

Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with S8

Record of Contacts

DMS Doekel No. FAA~:lOIl- 00 J 7

Date: 3/6/2009

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organizalion Person Contacted Date

Boeing Bob Robinson 7/IIiOS

ATA Joe ,"Vhite 7/I110S

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Masler List to Verify That This ISthe Correct Revision Before Use
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 10(c)

                       AMENDMENT TO MIRROR SAVINGS PLANS
                                 I, II AND III



         Effective as of March 22, 2001, the term "Benefit Plans Review
Committee" is deleted and the term "Human Resources and Compensation Committee
is substituted therefor in each place in which it appears.
EXHIBIT 12.1CERTIFICATIONI, Eivind Reiten, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Norsk Hydro ASA; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal controls over financial reporting.   Oslo,11 June 2007     /s/ Eivind Reiten      Eivind Reiten       President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Abram Wolkowsky, *Appellant,*v. Gutman Kirchick, Rosa Kirchick and Flora A. Tynes, *Appellees.*

Opinion Filed February 23, 1923.

Where the decree of the chancellor is not supported by, but is contrary to the evidence, it will be reversed by this court on appeal.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County; H. Pierre Branning, Judge.

Reversed.

*W. Hunt Harris,*for Appellant;

*H. H. Taylor,*for Appellees.

*211West, J.

This is the second appeal of this case to this court. It is a suit to foreclose a mortgage on real estate. The former appeal was from an order overruling exceptions to the answer. This order was affirmed. Wolkowsky v. Kirchick, 81 Fla. 415. The case having been remanded, it proceeded to final hearing upon various stipulations of counsel and testimony taken upon the issues presented. There was a final decree in favor of defendants, from which this appeal is taken.

The answer admits the execution of the mortgage and its validity, but denies that the indebtedness was due and the mortgage foreclosable at the time the suit was instituted. The defense interposed is that prior to the institution of the suit an agreement had been entered into between the mortgagee and mortgagors, by the terms of which the due date of the note was extended to a time later than the institution of the suit, and that the mortgagee had waived the covenant of the mortgagor to insure the premises with loss payable to the mortgagee, and therefore the debt was not due nor was the mortgage foreclosable because of any breach of its conditions by the mortgagors at the time the suit was instituted.

This was an affirmative defense and the burden of establishing it by a preponderance of the evidence rested upon the ■ defendants. American Securities Co. v. Goldsberry, 69 Fla. 104, 67 South. Rep. 862, 1 A. L. R. 15. It is equivocally affirmed by the defendants with slight, if any, corroboration. It is directly and unequivocally denied by the complainant. An examination of the record convinces us that the burden resting upon the defendants has not been sustained. The evidence offered is not of the character required in this class of cases. Where the decree of the chancellor is not supported by the evidence it will *212be reversed by this court on appeal. Bass v. Alderman, 82 Fla. 490, 90 South. Rep. 378; Florida National Bank v. Sherouse, 80 Fla. 405, 86 South. Rep. 279; Schmitt v. Bethea, 78 Fla. 304, 82 South. Rep. 817; Howard v. Sheffield, 73 Fla. 358, 74 South. Rep. 488.

Reversed.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis and Browne, J. J., concur.
Exhibit 31.1
                          CERTIFICATION

I, Greg Amato, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Epolin, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue  statements of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact  necessary  to make the statements made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under  which  such  statements  were   made,   not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,  and
other  financial  information included  in  this  report,  fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of  operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,  and  for,
the periods presented in this report;

      4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls  and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act  Rules  13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

           (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us  by  others  within  those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report  is
being prepared;

           (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report  our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls  and procedures, as of the end of the period covered  by
this report based on such evaluation; and

           (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting  that
occurred  during the small business issuer's most  recent  fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely  to
materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal  control
over financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and  I  have  disclosed, based on our most recent  evaluation  of
internal  control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a)    All   significant  deficiencies  and  material
weaknesses  in the design or operation of internal  control  over
financial  reporting  which are reasonable  likely  to  adversely
affect  the  small business issuer's ability to record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

           (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in  the
small   business   issuer's  internal  control   over   financial
reporting.



Dated: October 13, 2006       By:  /s/ Greg Amato
                              Greg Amato,
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              (Principal Executive Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

----------------------------------------------------------x 

In re: PROMESA 

 Title III 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND 

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

as representative of No. 17 BK 3283-LTS 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, (Jointly Administered) 

et al., 

 Debtors.1

----------------------------------------------------------x 

PRO SE NOTICES OF PARTICIPATION RECEIVED BY THE COURT 

(DISCOVERY FOR CONFIRMATION OF COMMONWEALTH PLAN OF ADJUSTMENT) 

The attached additional pro se Notices of Intent to Participate in Discovery 

Concerning Confirmation of Commonwealth Plan of Adjustment have been received by the Court 

on January 20, 2022 for filing in the above-captioned cases pursuant to the Order Establishing 

Preliminary Confirmation Submission and Discovery Procedures and Directing Notice to 

Creditors of the Same (Docket Entry No. 17431 in Case No. 17-3283). 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case 

number and the last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as 

applicable, are the (i) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “Commonwealth”) (Bankruptcy 

Case No. 17-BK-3283-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3481); (ii) Puerto Rico 

Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3284-LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation 

Authority (“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3567-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal 

Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees Retirement System of the Government of the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-3566-LTS) (Last 

Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) 

(Bankruptcy Case No. 17-BK-4780-LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747); and 

(vi) Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority (“PBA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 19-BK-5523-

LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3801) (Title III case numbers are listed as 

Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations). 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19856 Filed:01/21/22 Entered:01/21/22 11:18:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Pro Se Notices of Participation Received by the Court (Discovery – Confirmation Plan) 

January 21, 2022 

 2 

1. Nilda L. Colon Negron 

Dated: January 21, 2022 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19856 Filed:01/21/22 Entered:01/21/22 11:18:26 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
§ 5.63 Capital limitation under 12 U.S.C. 56. ( a ) *General limitation.* Except as provided by 12 U.S.C. 59 and § 5.46, a national bank may not withdraw, or permit to be withdrawn, either in the form of a dividend or otherwise, any portion of its permanent capital. Further, a national bank may not declare a dividend in excess of undivided profits.
( b ) *Preferred stock.* The provisions of 12 U.S.C. 56 do not apply to dividends on preferred stock. However, if the undivided profits of the national bank are not sufficient to cover a proposed dividend on preferred stock, the proposed dividend constitutes a reduction in capital subject to 12 U.S.C. 59 and § 5.46.
#### § 601.100 Cross-references to employee ethical conduct standards and financial disclosure regulations.

Board members, officers, and other employees of the Farm Credit Administration are subject to the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch at 5 CFR part 2635, the Farm Credit Administration regulation at 5 CFR part 4101, which supplements the Executive Branch-wide Standards, and the executive branch-wide financial disclosure regulations at 5 CFR part 2634.

[60 FR 30782, June 12, 1995]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3265 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3265

  To direct the Secretary of Energy to convey a parcel of land at the 
 facility of the Southwestern Power Administration in Tupelo, Oklahoma.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2003

    Mr. Carson of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Energy to convey a parcel of land at the 
 facility of the Southwestern Power Administration in Tupelo, Oklahoma.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, TUPELO, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Conveyance Required.--Except as required by subsection (d), the 
Secretary of Energy shall convey, without consideration, to Rural 
Enterprises of Oklahoma, Incorporated, all right, title, and interest 
of the United States in and to a parcel of land, and any improvements 
thereto, consisting of approximately 6.3 acres of the facility of the 
Southwestern Power Administration in Tupelo, Oklahoma.
    (b) Description of Parcel.--The exact acreage and description of 
the parcel to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a 
survey that is satisfactory to the Secretary and to Rural Enterprises 
of Oklahoma, Incorporated. The cost of the survey shall be borne by the 
recipient of the parcel.
    (c) Condition of Conveyance.--As a condition of the conveyance of 
the parcel under subsection (a), the Secretary shall require that Rural 
Enterprises of Oklahoma, Incorporated shall agree to use the parcel in 
conjunction with Tri County Nations Enterprise Community and to honor 
the terms of any lease of the parcel or portion thereof that is in 
existence on the date of the conveyance.
    (d) Easement.--Under the terms of the conveyance of the parcel 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall retain an easement to the 
parcel for the purpose of maintaining a sewage connection to the 
electrical substation and lagoon facility located adjacent to the 
parcel.
                                 <all>
```
#### BLACKMON V. ENGER.

(Decided June 19, 1913.)

Appeal from Anniston City Court.

Heard before Hon. Ti-iomas W. Coleman, Jr.

Blackm'on, Merrill & Walker, for appellant. A. F. McGhee, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on certificate.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                   QUIPP, INC.

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
                     ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      I, Michael S. Kady, Chief Executive Officer of Quipp, Inc., a Florida
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:

      (1)   The Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
            September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
            1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                     *  *  *

MICHAEL S. KADY
-----------------------
Michael S. Kady
Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 18, 2005

                                       18
<PAGE>   1
                                                        Exhibit 10.8

                                [AT&T LETTERHEAD]

                                                                   July 25, 2000

AT&T Latin America Corp.
2333 Ponce de Leon Blvd.
Coral Gables, FL 33134

                AT&T LATIN AMERICA 2000 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Reference is made to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on
today's date, by AT&T Latin America Corp. (the "STATEMENT"). This is to advise
you that AT&T, as a majority shareholder of AT&T Latin America, will approve the
AT&T Latin America 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan in a form substantially similar
to that exhibited with the Statement, with such substantial changes as may be
mutually agreed upon between AT&T and AT&T Latin America, at the latter's first
annual shareholder's meeting or such other special shareholder's meeting as may
be called for purposes of obtaining shareholder approval for said plan.

                                                    AT&T CORPORATION


                                                     By: /s/ John A. Haigh
                                                         -----------------------
                                                          Name: John A. Haigh
                                                          Title: Vice President
##### 



Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE) Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the Act) and Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), each of the undersigned,
Svein Rennemo, President and Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Geo-Services ASA, a Norwegian
public limited liability company (the Company), and Gottfred Langseth, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that, to his knowledge: (1)
the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: May 9, 2005
    /s/ Svein RennemoSvein RennemoPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 /s/ Gottfred LangsethGottfred LangsethSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and
Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Exchange Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.
H. R. 3379

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3210 East

10th Street in Bloomington, Indiana, as the ‘‘Francis X. McCloskey Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

3210 East 10th Street in Bloomington, Indiana, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Francis X. McCloskey Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Francis

X. McCloskey Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
August 3, 2015

Mr. Eric Deroche

T Baker Smith, LLC

P.O. Box 2266

Houma, LA 70361

Dear Mr. Deroche: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

part 21 and §§ 45.23, 45.29, 61.3, 61.23, 61.113(a) and (b), 61.133(a), 91.7(a), 91.9, 

91.109(a), 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203, and 91.401–91.417 of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should 

do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your May 13, 2015, exemption request on behalf of T Baker Smith, LLC into the 

public docket (No. FAA−2015−2140), but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3