alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023304EN.01000101.xml

| 28.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2023/C 304/01)

Last publication

OJ C 296, 21.8.2023

Past publications

OJ C 286, 14.8.2023

OJ C 278, 7.8.2023

OJ C 271, 31.7.2023

OJ C 261, 24.7.2023

OJ C 252, 17.7.2023

OJ C 235, 3.7.2023

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eldorado Artesian Springs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) I, Douglas Larson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Douglas LarsonPresident(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: August 14, 2012
#### Charles E. Nicoll, Appellant, *v.*Thomas Lloyd, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of the city of Eew York, second district, borough of Manhattan.

Pip.Tija.miri *&*Loeser, for appellant.

William C. Timm, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Both parties appeal from the judgment.

A former judgment in favor of the plaintiff was reversed because the action was brought for work, labor and services performed, whereas it should have been for damages for breach of contract, and the order of reversal awarded to the defendant, costs to abide the event. Nicoll v. Lloyd, 26 Misc. Rep. 799. Upon the second trial the justice, against the defendant’s objection and exception, permitted the complaint to be amended so as to demand damages for breach of contract, no terms being imposed as a condition of such amendment. This was error. The defendant should at least have been allowed the costs of the former appeal. The plaintiff appeals upon the ground that the amount of damages awarded by the justice was manifestly inadequate under the *776evidence. In this he is clearly right, assuming that the plaintiff is entitled to damages at all. In fact it would seem that the amount for which judgment was awarded must have been inserted by an inadvertence.

‘Upon both appeals the judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted, but without costs to either party.

Present: Tbuax, P. J., Scott and Dug-bo, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, without costs.
§ 210.42 Reliance on identifying number. ( a ) *Reliance by a Federal Reserve Bank on number to identify a beneficiary's bank.* A Federal Reserve Bank that receives a payment order from a sender containing a number that identifies the beneficiary's bank may rely on the number, even if it identifies a bank different from the bank identified by name in the payment order, if the Federal Reserve Bank does not know of such an inconsistency in identification. A Federal Reserve Bank has no duty to detect any such inconsistency in identification.
( b ) *Reliance by a Federal Reserve Bank on number to identify beneficiary.* A Federal Reserve Bank, acting as a beneficiary's bank, that receives a payment order from a sender containing a number that identifies the beneficiary may rely on the number, even if it identifies a person different from the person identified by name in the payment order, if the Federal Reserve Bank does not know of such an inconsistency in identification. A Federal Reserve Bank has no duty to detect any such inconsistency in identification.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3177

WILLIAM L. CAIN, SR.,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,

Respondent.

Peter J. Eide , Law Offices of Peter J. Eide, LLC, of Columbia, Maryland, argued for petitioner.

Kenneth D. Woodrow , Trial Attorney, Commercial Liti gation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Wash ington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were Tony West , Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, and Patricia M. McCarthy , Assistant Director.

Appealed from: Merit S ystems Protection BoardNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3177

WILLIAM L. CAIN, SR.,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,

Respondent. 

## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board

In CASE NO(S). DC0842070848-I-2.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (RADER, PLAGER, and PROST, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.



### ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED December 14, 2009

_ /s/ Jan Horbaly

_________________________ 

### Jan Horbaly, Clerk
EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report Form 10-K of Storage Engine, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Louis J.
Altieri,  Vice  President,  Finance and  Administration  of the Company,  hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

                                    /s/ Louis J. Altieri
                                    -----------------------------------
Dated:   March 31, 2003            Louis J. Altieri, Vice President,
                                   Finance and Administration
                                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Storage Engine,  Inc. and will be retained by Storage  Engine,  Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           25400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3738
<ALLOWANCES>                                       435
<INVENTORY>                                       1164
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 35569
<PP&E>                                          286170
<DEPRECIATION>                                   64261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  386571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            54540
<BONDS>                                         150000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           163
<OTHER-SE>                                      162746
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    386571
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 84050
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    37759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 36110
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4976
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5294
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2197
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3097
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3097
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3323

To permit States to require insurance companies to disclose insurance 

information. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16, 2003

Mr. SCHIFF (for himself and Mr. RADANOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To permit States to require insurance companies to disclose 

insurance information.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Armenian Victims In5 surance Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR STATES TO REQUIRE DISCLO7 SURE OF INSURANCE INFORMATION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any State may implement a law 

9 that—
2

•HR 3323 IH 

1 (1) requires insurance companies conducting 

2 business in the State to disclose (and to make pub3 licly available) details regarding some or all covered 

4 policies described in subsection (b) that were issued 

5 by that company or by any related company; and 

6 (2) provides for appropriate penalties and sanc7 tions for noncompliance. 

8 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section: 

9 (1) COVERED POLICY.—A covered policy de10 scribed in this paragraph is a life, property, liability, 

11 health annuity, dowry, educational, or casualty in12 surance policy that was issued to a policyholder 

13 domiciled in the area of Europe or Asia that was oc14 cupied or controlled by the Ottoman Empire and 

15 that was in effect at any time between 1875 and 

16 1923. 

17 (2) RELATED COMPANY.—The term ‘‘related 

18 company’’ includes, with respect to an insurance 

19 company, any parent, subsidiary, reinsurer, suc20 cessor in interest, managing general agent, or affil21 iate company, whether or not the company was re22 lated during the time when a covered policy was 

23 sold. 

24 (c) CONGRESSIONAL DISAPPROVAL.—Any Executive 

25 branch policy or agreement that preempts State efforts to 
3

•HR 3323 IH 

1 collect insurance information to resolve outstanding claims 

2 concerning covered policies described in subsection (b)(1) 

3 is explicitly disapproved by the Congress.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002


I, Mark A. Franzen, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of MTI Technology Corporation (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
    the Company for the fiscal year ended April 5 2003 (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                            

Dated: July 11, 2003



| |     |                    
| | --- | -------------------
| | By: | /s/ MARK A. FRANZEN

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Mark A. Franzen        
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | and Secretary          

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to MTI Technology
and will be retained by MTI Technology and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3313

AN ACT

To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit

the Defense of Marriage Act.Federal court jurisdiction over questions under

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3313

AN ACT

To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit Federal

court jurisdiction over questions under the Defense of

Marriage Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3313 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Marriage Protection

3 Act of 2004’’.

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON JURISDICTION.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 99 of title 28, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing:

8 ‘‘§ 1632. Limitation on jurisdiction

9 ‘‘No court created by Act of Congress shall have any

10 jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court shall have no appel11 late jurisdiction, to hear or decide any question pertaining

12 to the interpretation of, or the validity under the Constitu13 tion of, section 1738C or this section.’’.

14 (b) AMENDMENTS TO THE TABLE OF SECTIONS.—

15 The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 99 of

16 title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the

17 end the following new item:

‘‘1632. Limitation on jurisdiction.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
A. Jayson Adair, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Copart, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that, based on my knowledge, the information contained in this Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
Copart, Inc.

/s/A. JAYSON ADAIR A. Jayson Adair
Chief Executive Officer


Date:
September 23, 2010

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Copart, Inc. and will be retained by Copart, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3229 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 3229

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 14, 2003

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 44, United States Code, to transfer to the Public 
 Printer the authority over the individuals responsible for preparing 
      indexes of the Congressional Record, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER TO PUBLIC PRINTER OF AUTHORITY OVER INDIVIDUALS 
              RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING CONGRESSIONAL RECORD INDEXES.

    (a) In General.--Section 902 of title 44, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 902. Congressional Record: Indexes
    ``The Public Printer shall prepare the semimonthly and the session 
index to the Congressional Record. The Joint Committee on Printing 
shall direct the form and manner of its publication and 
distribution.''.
    (b) Transition Rule for Current Employees.--
            (1) In general.--Any individual who is an employee of the 
        Congressional Record Index Office as of the effective date of 
        this Act shall be transferred to the Government Printing 
        Office, subject to the provisions of this title governing the 
        selection and appointment of employees of the Government 
        Printing Office and any applicable regulations.
            (2) Treatment of accrued leave.--Any annual and sick leave 
        accrued by such an individual prior to such date shall be 
        transferred and made available to the individual as an employee 
        of the Government Printing Office, subject to applicable 
        regulations of the Government Printing Office governing the use 
        of such leave.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall apply with 
respect to pay periods beginning on or after October 1, 2003 (or, if 
later, the first day of the first month which begins after the date of 
the enactment of this Act).

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
LTS Doc#:19831-2 Filed:01/18/22 Entered:01/19/22 17:00:55 Desc:

Envelope Page 1 of 1
----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Reportof TurboSonic Technologies Inc., (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the yearending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, (the"Report"), I, Edward F. Spink, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

(1) 

The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) 

The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company. 

/s/ EDWARD F. SPINK                  Edward F. Spink Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer ) September 24, 2008 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Reportof TurboSonic Technologies Inc., (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the yearending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, (the"Report"), I, Carl A. Young, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
(2) 

The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company. 

/s/ CARL A. YOUNG                      Carl A. Young Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) September 24, 2008
##### 



EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF MTI TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION

|                               |  |                
|------------------------------ |  | ---------------
|                               |  | Jurisdiction of
|Subsidiary                     |  | Incorporation  
|                               |  |                
|MTI Technology GMBH            |  | Germany        
|MTI Technology Limited         |  | Scotland       
|MTI France SA                  |  | France         
|MTI Technology Ireland Ltd.    |  | Ireland        
|MTI Technology BV              |  | Holland        
|MTI Technology Limited         |  | Ireland        
|MTI Technology BV-Irish Branch |  | Ireland
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 148 (Thursday, August 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 46671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18557]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 364]

Membership on the Presidential Task Force on Wildlife Trafficking

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State, 
including Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as 
amended (22 U.S.C. Sec.  2651a), and Executive Order 13648 of July 1, 
2013 (the Executive Order), I hereby designate the Under Secretary for 
Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment (the Under Secretary) as 
the Department of State representative to the Presidential Task Force 
on Wildlife Trafficking, established by Section 2 of the Executive 
Order; together with the authorities necessary to carry out such 
function.
    In the event that the position of the Under Secretary is vacant, I 
hereby designate the Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy 
and Human Rights, and in the Under Secretaries' collective absence, the 
Assistant Secretary for Oceans and International Environmental and 
Scientific Affairs to be the Department of State representative for 
purposes of the Executive Order.
    Any act, executive order, regulation, or procedure subject to, or 
affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive 
order, regulation, or procedure as amended from time to time.
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary, the 
Deputy Secretary, and the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources 
may at any time exercise any authority or function delegated by this 
delegation of authority.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: July 23, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-18557 Filed 7-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```