alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010265EN.01000801.xml

| 30.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/8

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2010/C 265/07

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption | : | 10 March 2010 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 67806 |
| Decision No | : | 75/10/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Legal basis | : | Parliamentary proposition No 1 (2009-2010) |
| Objective | : | Increase the supply of renewable heat and energy. Contribute to energy saving |
| Form of aid | : | Grants |
| Budget | : | Approximately NOK 2,8 billion |
| Duration | : | Until end of 2010 |
| Economic sectors | : | Energy, electricity |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Enova SF |
| Professor Brochsgt. 2 |
| 7030 Trondheim |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption

:

10 March 2010

Case number

:

67806

Decision No

:

75/10/COL

EFTA State

:

Norway

Legal basis

:

Parliamentary proposition No 1 (2009-2010)

Objective

:

Increase the supply of renewable heat and energy. Contribute to energy saving

Form of aid

:

Grants

Budget

:

Approximately NOK 2,8 billion

Duration

:

Until end of 2010

Economic sectors

:

Energy, electricity

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Enova SF

Professor Brochsgt. 2

7030 Trondheim

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
#### James B. Moore et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents, *v.*William Rankin, Appellant.

.Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, eighth district, borough of Manhattan.

Quackenbush *&*Wise, for appellant.

J. Kelly, for respondents.

*750
      *Per Curiam.*

Since the decision of the cases referred to by counsel for the appellant, this court has held that it is not necessary that the record should show that the defendant was a resident of the city of New York, in order to sustain the jurisdiction of the court below. We think, however, that the judgment should be reversed for error committed by the justice below upon the trial. The important question involved in the case, was whether the defendant had leased the apartments in question for a term of one year. The only proof offered upon the subject by the counsel for the plaintiffs, was that such agreements were made by one Litkin, stated to be the agent of the defendant, but there was no competent proof of his agency, nor assuming that he was in some sense an agent of the defendant, did it appear that he had any authority whatsoever to make a lease for such a period. With respect to the fact of agency, the trial justice admitted evidence of the alleged agent’s nondeclarations that he was such agent. It is well settled, however, that such extra judicial statements are not evidence of the fact. The trial justice further erred in admitting in evidence a paper stating the terms of the letting, made by the alleged agent long after the letting is alleged to have taken place and long after he had admittedly ceased to have anything whatsoever to do with the property or with the defendant. From every point of view the admission of this paper was erroneous.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Beekmaw, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobmah, JJ.

¡Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
#### § 390.428 Approval of the security.

Any securities of a State savings association which are not exempt under this subpart and are offered or sold pursuant to an offering circular which becomes effective under this subpart, are deemed to be approved as to form and terms for purposes of this subpart.
§ 308.14 Witness fees and expenses. ( a ) *In general.* A witness, including an expert witness, who testifies at a deposition or hearing will be paid the same fees for attendance and mileage as are paid in the United States district courts in proceedings in which the United States is a party, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section and unless otherwise waived.
( b ) *Exception for testimony by a party.* In the case of testimony by a party, no witness fees or mileage need to be paid. The FDIC will not be required to pay any fees to, or expenses of, any witness not subpoenaed by the FDIC.
( c ) *Timing of payment.* Fees and mileage in accordance with this paragraph (c) must be paid in advance by the party requesting the subpoena, except that fees and mileage need not be tendered in advance where the FDIC is the party requesting the subpoena.
§ 619.9270 Qualified Public Accountant or External Auditor. A qualified public accountant or external auditor is a person who: ( a ) Holds a valid and unrevoked certificate, issued to such person by a legally constituted State authority, identifying such person as a certified public accountant;
( b ) Is licensed to practice as a public accountant by an appropriate regulatory authority of a State or other political subdivision of the United States;
( c ) Is in good standing as a certified and licensed public accountant under the laws of the State or other political subdivision of the United States in which is located the home office or corporate office of the institution that is to be audited;
( d ) Is not suspended or otherwise barred from practice as an accountant or public accountant before the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or any other appropriate Federal or State regulatory authority; and
( e ) Is independent of the institution that is to be audited. For the purposes of this definition, the term “independent” has the same meaning as under the rules and interpretations of the authoritative body governing overall audit performance. At a minimum, an accountant hired to audit a System institution is not independent if he or she functions in the role of management, audits his or her own work, or serves in an advocacy role for the institution.
[71 FR 76119, Dec. 20, 2006, as amended at 74 FR 28599, June 17, 2009]
#### § 626.6015 Nondiscriminatory appraisal.

No Farm Credit institution shall discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin when conducting, using, or relying upon an appraisal of residential real property that is subject to sale, rental, or other financing transaction.

[57 FR 13638, Apr. 17, 1992. Redesignated at 62 FR 4441, Jan. 30, 1997]
I

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3270

To extend the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 

2002. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2003

Ms. DUNN (for herself, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. HAYES, Mr. QUINN, Mr. SHIMKUS, 

Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. MCHUGH, Mrs. WILSON of New Mexico, Mr. UPTON, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. KING of New 

York, Mr. BAKER, Mr. WALDEN of Oregon, and Mr. SWEENEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL

To extend the Temporary Extended Unemployment 

Compensation Act of 2002.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Workers Assistance 

5 Extension Act’’. 
2

•HR 3270 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY EXTENDED UNEM2 PLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT OF 2002. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 208 of the Temporary Ex4 tended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002 (Public 

5 Law 107–147; 116 Stat. 30), as amended by Public Law 

6 108–1 (117 Stat. 3) and Public Law 108–26 (117 Stat. 

7 751), is amended—

8 (1) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ‘‘December 

9 31, 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2004’’; 

10 (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘December 

11 31, 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2004’’; 

12 (3) in subsection (b)(2)—

13 (A) in the heading, by striking ‘‘DECEM14 BER 31, 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘JUNE 30, 2004’’; 

15 and 

16 (B) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2003’’ and 

17 inserting ‘‘June 30, 2004’’; and 

18 (4) in subsection (b)(3), by striking ‘‘March 31, 

19 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2004’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

21 this section shall take effect as if included in the enact22 ment of the Temporary Extended Unemployment Com23 pensation Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–147; 116 Stat. 

24 21).

Æ
#### § 308.16 FDIC's right to conduct examination.

Nothing contained in this subpart limits in any manner the right of the FDIC to conduct any examination, inspection, or visitation of any institution or institution-affiliated party, or the right of the FDIC to conduct or continue any form of investigation authorized by law.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 200 (Monday, October 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24952]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6789]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Origins of El Greco: Icon Painting in Venetian 
Crete''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in 
the exhibition: ``The Origins of El Greco: Icon Painting in Venetian 
Crete,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Onassis Cultural Center, New York, NY, from on or about November 
16, 2009, until on or about February 27, 2010, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to 
be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, 2200 C 
Street, NW., Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: October 9, 2009.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-24952 Filed 10-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 195 (Friday, October 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24406]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission: 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code, that a meeting of the John H. Chafee Blackstone 
River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission will be held on 
Thursday, November 19, 2009.
    The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-647. The 
purpose of the Commission is to assist federal, state and local 
authorities in the development and implementation of an integrated 
resource management plan for those lands and waters within the 
Corridor.
    The meeting will convene on November 19, 2009 at 9 a.m. at the 
South Grafton Community Center located at 25 Main Street, South 
Grafton, MA for the following reasons:
    1. Approval of Minutes.
    2. Chairman's Report.
    3. Executive Director's Report.
    4. Financial Budget.
    5. Public Input.
    It is anticipated that about thirty people will be able to attend 
the session in addition to the Commission members.
    Interested persons may make oral or written presentations to the 
Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made 
prior to the meeting to: Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director, John H. 
Chafee, Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission, 
One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI 02895, Tel.: (401) 762-0250.
    Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director of the Commission at the 
aforementioned address.

Jan H. Reitsma,
Executive Director, BRVNHCC.

Notice of Full Commission Meeting for the John H. Chafee Blackstone 
River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission

    Notice is hereby given, in accordance with section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code, that the meeting of the Full Commission of the John 
H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission 
will be held on Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 9 a.m. at the South 
Grafton Community Center located at 25 Main Street, South Grafton, MA. 
The purpose of the Commission is to assist federal, state and local 
authorities in the development and implementation of an integrated 
Resource Management Plan for those lands and waters within the Corridor 
in Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

[FR Doc. E9-24406 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19885 Filed:01/21/22 Entered:01/25/22 14:53:03 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19885 Filed:01/21/22 Entered:01/25/22 14:53:03 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         JUL-01-1998    
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         157
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               157
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         4312
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     31420
<OTHER-SE>                                  (35575)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              9336
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (9336)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (9336)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (9336)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<MULTIPLIER>            1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-24-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-24-1998
<CASH>                                          74,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,474,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                    63,900
<INVENTORY>                                  6,583,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,250,400
<PP&E>                                       5,775,300
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,670,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,861,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,723,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,600
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,030,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,861,600
<SALES>                                      4,959,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,959,500
<CGS>                                        4,074,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,074,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,027,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (90,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (36,600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (54,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (54,300)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAE WOO PARK,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-70445

Agency No. A089-244-923

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 8, 2012** 

Before: ALARCÓN, BERZON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Jae Woo Park, a native and citizen of Korea, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion for a continuance and application for

cancellation for removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

FILED

AUG 15 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-70445

for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion for a continuance, Karapetyan v.

Mukasey, 543 F.3d 1118, 1121 (9th Cir. 2008), superseded by statute on other

grounds as stated in Owino v. Holder, 575 F.3d 956, 958 (9th Cir. 2009) (per

curiam), and review de novo questions of law, Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th

Cir. 2001). We deny the petition for review. 

The IJ did not abuse her discretion in denying Park’s motion for a

continuance where he had known about his hearing date for nine months and had

previously been granted three continuances. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (IJ has

authority to grant a continuance upon a showing of good cause); Karapetyan, 543

F.3d at 1129. 

Park did not show he was prejudiced by the absence of counsel at his first

hearing where he admitted the charge of removability or at his later merits hearing

where he did not show sufficient hardship to qualify for cancellation of removal, in

that he failed to show how the presence of counsel may have affected the outcome

of his proceedings. See Ram v. Mukasey, 529 F.3d 1238, 1242-43 (“To

demonstrate prejudice, and thus a denial of due process, [petitioner] must show that

the denial of his right to counsel potentially affected the outcome of the

proceedings.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### § 37.5 Method of payment of fees.

Except as provided in § 37.3(c)(2), a bank may offer a customer the option of paying the fee for a contract in a single payment, provided the bank also offers the customer a *bona fide* option of paying the fee for that contract in monthly or other periodic payments. If the bank offers the customer the option to finance the single payment by adding it to the amount the customer is borrowing, the bank must also disclose to the customer, in accordance with § 37.6, whether and, if so, the time period during which, the customer may cancel the agreement and receive a refund.
H. R. 3118

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the Orville Wright Federal Building and the Wilbur Wright Federal

Building in Washington, District of Columbia.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ORVILLE WRIGHT FEDERAL BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building located at 800

Independence Avenue, Southwest, in Washington, District of

Columbia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Orville Wright

Federal Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

building referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a

reference to the ‘‘Orville Wright Federal Building’’.

SEC. 2. WILBUR WRIGHT FEDERAL BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building located at 600

Independence Avenue, Southwest, in Washington, District of

Columbia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Wilbur Wright

Federal Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

building referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a

reference to the ‘‘Wilbur Wright Federal Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.