alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of ANTs software
inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for the period ended September 30,
2009:





1.           Fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




This
certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be
deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any
purpose whatsoever.





Date:
November 23, 2009








/s/ Joseph
      KozakJoseph Kozak, Chief
      Executive Officer and President




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the
Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3212

To provide additional funds for deployment rotation and other relief for 

United States troops serving in Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2003

Mr. SHUSTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committee on 

Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To provide additional funds for deployment rotation and 

other relief for United States troops serving in Iraq.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR DE4 PLOYMENT ROTATION AND OTHER RELIEF 

5 FOR UNITED STATES TROOPS SERVING IN 

6 IRAQ. 

7 (a) AVAILABILITY.—Notwithstanding any other pro8 vision of law, $200,000,000 of the amount made available 

9 for United States contributions to the United Nations 
2

•HR 3212 IH 

1 under the heading ‘‘International Organizations and Con2 ferences—contributions to international organizations’’ 

3 under the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, 

4 the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 

5 2004, may be made available to provide adequate deploy6 ment rotation and other relief for United States troops 

7 serving in Iraq. 

8 (b) EXCEPTION.—The requirement of subsection (a) 

9 shall not apply if the United Nations adopts a resolution 

10 that provides support for the security, rehabilitation, and 

11 reconstruction activities of the United States in Iraq and 

12 provides appropriate financial and in kind contributions 

13 from other member nations of the United Nations in sup14 port of such activities.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER					PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350					AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to my knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the quarter ended September 30, 2003:

1. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and			2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 13, 2003        By:        /s/ Kenneth Ruotolo			                                                             Kenneth Ruotolo                                                             Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
#### § 1805.811 Fraud, waste and abuse.

Any person who becomes aware of the existence or apparent existence of fraud, waste, or abuse of assistance provided under this part should report such incidences to the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Willis J. Johnson, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Copart, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that, based on my knowledge, the information contained in this Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
Copart, Inc.

|                                                               |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/WILLIS J. JOHNSON Willis J. Johnson
Chief Executive Officer |  | 

Date:
September 29, 2009

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Copart, Inc. and will be retained by Copart, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
#### § 404.30 Notification of General Counsel required.

Ex-Im Bank personnel receiving a demand for testimony and/or production of records regarding information acquired in the course of their performance of official duties, or due to their official status, shall immediately notify the General Counsel of Ex-Im Bank (“General Counsel”) upon receipt of such demand. The General Counsel maintains the exclusive authority to waive the requirements of any or all sections of this subpart and reserves the right to delegate his or her authority under this subpart to other appropriate Ex-Im Bank personnel.

[71 FR 14361, Mar. 22, 2006. Redesignated at 87 FR 41034, July 11, 2022]
§ 611.1150 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* This subpart sets forth the parameters for one or more Farm Credit System (System) institutions to organize or invest in an Unincorporated Business Entity (UBE) in accordance with the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended (Act).
( b ) *Scope.* Except as authorized under these regulations, no System institution may manage, control, become a member or partner, or invest in a State-organized or chartered business entity. This subpart applies to each System institution that organizes or invests in a UBE, including a UBE organized for the express purpose of investing in a Rural Business Investment Company. This subpart does not apply to UBEs that one or more System institutions have the authority to establish as Rural Business Investment Companies pursuant to the provisions of title VI of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, as amended (FSRIA) and United States Department of Agriculture regulations implementing FSRIA.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alliance Financial Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack H. Webb, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
August 7, 2009



/s/ Jack H. WebbName:

Jack H. WebbTitle:

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
May 20, 2015

Rubin Garcia

2780 Northeast 183 St #191 Aventura, FL 33160

Dear Mr. Rubin Garcia:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 25th, 2015 exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0764), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
§ 369.5 Sanctions. ( a ) *In general.* If the FDIC determines that a bank is not reasonably helping to meet the credit needs of the communities served by the bank in the host state, and that the bank's statewide loan-to-deposit ratio is less than 50 percent of the host state loan-to-deposit ratio, the FDIC: ( 1 ) May order that a bank's covered interstate branch or branches be closed unless the bank provides reasonable assurances to the satisfaction of the FDIC, after an opportunity for public comment, that the bank has an acceptable plan under which the bank will reasonably help to meet the credit needs of the communities served by the bank in the host state; and
( 2 ) Will not permit the bank to open a new branch in the host state that would be considered to be a covered interstate branch unless the bank provides reasonable assurances to the satisfaction of the FDIC, after an opportunity for public comment, that the bank will reasonably help to meet the credit needs of the community that the new branch will serve.
( b ) *Notice prior to closure of a covered interstate branch.* Before exercising the FDIC's authority to order the bank to close a covered interstate branch, the FDIC will issue to the bank a notice of the FDIC's intent to order the closure and will schedule a hearing within 60 days of issuing the notice.
( c ) *Hearing.* The FDIC will conduct a hearing scheduled under paragraph (b) of this section in accordance with the provisions of 12 U.S.C. 1818(h) and 12 CFR part 308.
#### Dorothy BESHARSE *v.*CITY of BLYTHEVILLE, Arkansas

73-36

493 S.W. 2d 708

Opinion delivered April 30, 1973

[Rehearing denied May 25, 1973.]

*383*Jake Brick*and *Oscar Fendler,*for appellant.

*Bill Rose*and *Gardner & Steinsiek,*for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Upon petition of appellee City of Blytheville, Arkansas, a writ of mandamus was issued directing appellant Dorothy Besharse, the city clerk, to comply with ordinances No. 869 and 870 of the City of Blytheville. For reversal she contends: that the ordinances are illegal, unlawful and without legal effect; that the city had an otherwise adequate remedy; and that in the exercise of its discretion the trial court should have denied the petition for mandamus.

One of the ordinances creates the office of “Finance Director” to be in charge of the city’s financial affairs and provided the city’s moneys should be paid out upon the signature of the “Finance Director” and the Mayor. Appellant who had been in charge of the city’s finances was directed by the other ordinances to turn over to the “Finance Director” bank accounts, bookkeeping records, etc., used in connection with such duties.

We can find nothing in Sections 3 and 4 of Article 12 of our Constitution that would prohibit the General Assembly from permitting cities and towns to handle their finances as the appellee here proposes to do.

We find nothing in ordinances 869 & 870 contrary to the general laws of the state. Appellant relies upon several sections of Act 1 of 1875, as placing the duties of financial management upon the clerk. We do not necessarily agree with appellant’s interpretation thereof but any doubt as to the right of the City of Blytheville to legislate on the matter is removed by Acts 1971, No. 266 which provides:

> “Section 1. Any city of the first class is hereby authorized to perform any function and full legislative power in any and all matters of whatsoever nature *384pertaining to its municipal affairs including but not limited to the power to tax.”

Neither does appellant have a vested right to prevent the city from changing the duties imposed upon her through its legislative processes. See *Hunter State Bank*v. *Mills,*90 Ark. 10, 117 S.W. 760 (1909).

Appellant also contends that by virtue of some outstanding bonds the city is prevented from moving the financial affairs from her office. On this issue, we find that she as city clerk has no standing to complain.

It thus appearing that the transfer of the funds, books and bookkeeping machinery involved only a ministerial function, the writ of mandamus was properly issued. See *Ghent*v. *State Use School Districts,*189 Ark. 747, 75 S.W. 2d 67 (1934).

Affirmed.
#### § 611.500 General.

Each Farm Credit Bank or Agricultural Credit Bank is authorized, in accordance with section 7.6 of the Act, to transfer certain authorities to Federal land bank associations. The regulations in this subpart set forth the procedures and voting and approval requirements applicable to such transfers.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 4.8(b)

Facility Lease Agreement (Morgantown L2) between Southern Energy Mid-Atlantic,
LLC, as Lessee, and Morgantown OL2 LLC, as Owner Lessor, dated as of December
19, 2000

Facility Lease Agreement (Morgantown L3) between Southern Energy Mid-Atlantic,
LLC, as Lessee, and Morgantown OL3 LLC, as Owner Lessor, dated as of December
19, 2000

Facility Lease Agreement (Morgantown L4) between Southern Energy Mid-Atlantic,
LLC, as Lessee, and Morgantown OL4 LLC, as Owner Lessor, dated as of December
19, 2000

Facility Lease Agreement (Morgantown L5) between Southern Energy Mid-Atlantic,
LLC, as Lessee, and Morgantown OL5 LLC, as Owner Lessor, dated as of December
19, 2000

Facility Lease Agreement (Morgantown L6) between Southern Energy Mid-Atlantic,
LLC, as Lessee, and Morgantown OL6 LLC, as Owner Lessor, dated as of December
19, 2000

Facility Lease Agreement (Morgantown L7) between Southern Energy Mid-Atlantic,
LLC, as Lessee, and Morgantown OL7 LLC, as Owner Lessor, dated as of December
19, 2000
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 4.6(b)

Participation Agreement (Morgantown L2) among Southern Energy Mid-Atlantic, LLC,
as Lessee, Morgantown OL2 LLC, as Owner Lessor, Wilmington Trust Company, as
Owner Manager, SEMA OP2, as Owner Participant and State Street Bank and Trust
Company of Connecticut, National Association, as Lease Indenture Trustee and as
Pass Through Trustee, dated as of December 18, 2000

Participation Agreement (Morgantown L3) among Southern Energy Mid-Atlantic, LLC,
as Lessee, Morgantown OL3 LLC, as Owner Lessor, Wilmington Trust Company, as
Owner Manager, SEMA OP4, as Owner Participant and State Street Bank and Trust
Company of Connecticut, National Association, as Lease Indenture Trustee and as
Pass Through Trustee, dated as of December 18, 2000

Participation Agreement (Morgantown L4) among Southern Energy Mid-Atlantic, LLC,
as Lessee, Morgantown OL4 LLC, as Owner Lessor, Wilmington Trust Company, as
Owner Manager, SEMA OP5, as Owner Participant and State Street Bank and Trust
Company of Connecticut, National Association, as Lease Indenture Trustee and as
Pass Through Trustee, dated as of December 18, 2000

Participation Agreement (Morgantown L5) among Southern Energy Mid-Atlantic, LLC,
as Lessee, Morgantown OL5 LLC, as Owner Lessor, Wilmington Trust Company, as
Owner Manager, SEMA OP8, as Owner Participant and State Street Bank and Trust
Company of Connecticut, National Association, as Lease Indenture Trustee and as
Pass Through Trustee, dated as of December 18, 2000

Participation Agreement (Morgantown L6) among Southern Energy Mid-Atlantic, LLC,
as Lessee, Morgantown OL6 LLC, as Owner Lessor, Wilmington Trust Company, as
Owner Manager, SEMA OP9, as Owner Participant and State Street Bank and Trust
Company of Connecticut, National Association, as Lease Indenture Trustee and as
Pass Through Trustee, dated as of December 18, 2000

Participation Agreement (Morgantown L7) among Southern Energy Mid-Atlantic, LLC,
as Lessee, Morgantown OL7 LLC, as Owner Lessor, Wilmington Trust Company, as
Owner Manager, SEMA OP9, as Owner Participant and State Street Bank and Trust
Company of Connecticut, National Association, as Lease Indenture Trustee and as
Pass Through Trustee, dated as of December 18, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         432,494
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,519,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                   67,490
<INVENTORY>                                    6,743,501
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,081,502
<PP&E>                                         12,811,921
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,264,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 21,811,772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,967,838
<BONDS>                                        5,389,050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       444
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,603,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   21,811,772
<SALES>                                        9,003,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,131,747
<CGS>                                          6,236,440
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,983,703 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (23,774)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             704,059
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,532,241)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,532,241)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.79)
        


</TABLE>
Ozone NAAQS Teleconference 

8/19/2010 

Andrea Drinkard/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Anna Wood/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, 

bbailey@gsblaw.com, dbaron@earthjustice.org, dkaplan@enrd.usdoj.gov, Don 

Zinger/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Gautam Srinivasan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jenny 

Noonan/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen 

Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin McLean/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia 

Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael.Myers@ag.ny.gov

Location: ARN 5400 

EXTERNAL ATTENDEES 

Harold G. Bailey - Garvey Schubert Barer 

David Baron – Earth Justice 

David Kaplan – US DOJ Environment and Natural Resource Division 

Michael Myers – Attorney General, NY
§ 608.811 Special review. ( a ) An employee subject to salary offset, under subpart C of this part, or a voluntary repayment agreement, may, at any time, request a special review by the FCA of the amount of the salary offset or voluntary repayment, based on materially changed circumstances such as, but not limited to, catastrophic illness, divorce, death, or disability.
( b ) To determine whether an offset would prevent the employee from meeting essential subsistence expenses (costs incurred for food, housing, clothing, transportation, and medical care), the employee shall submit a detailed statement and supporting documents for the employee, his or her spouse, and dependents indicating: ( 1 ) Income from all sources;
( 2 ) Assets;
( 3 ) Liabilities;
( 4 ) Number of dependents;
( 5 ) Expenses for food, housing, clothing, and transportation;
( 6 ) Medical expenses; and
( 7 ) Exceptional expenses, if any.
( c ) If the employee requests a special review under this section, the employee shall file an alternative proposed offset or payment schedule and a statement, with supporting documents, showing why the current salary offset or payments result in an extreme financial hardship to the employee.
( d ) The FCA shall evaluate the statement and supporting documents, and determine whether the original offset or repayment schedule imposes an undue financial hardship on the employee. The FCA shall notify the employee in writing of such determination, including, if appropriate, a revised offset or payment schedule.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19807-7 Filed:01/18/22 Entered:01/18/22 13:06:57 Desc:

Exhibit Exhibit 7 Infracity Report January 2014 Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19807-7 Filed:01/18/22 Entered:01/18/22 13:06:57 Desc:

Exhibit Exhibit 7 Infracity Report January 2014 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 4.1






                                      E-16
<PAGE>

                Incorporated Under the Laws Of The State of Texas

         Number                      Shares
    [GRAPHIC OMITTED]


                          D I R E C T  W I R E L E S S C
                               OMMUNICATIONS, INC.

         The Corporation is authorized to issue 10,000,000 Common Shares

                                  COMMON STOCK

THIS CERTIFIES THAT ______________________SAMPLE CERTIFICATE______________ IS
THE OWNER OF THE SHARES SET FORTH HEREON, FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON
SHARES OF THE ABOVE CORPORATION TRANSFERABLE ONLY ON THE BOOKS OF THE
CORPORATION BY THE HOLDER HEREOF IN PERSON OR BY DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY UPON
SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE SAID CORPORATION HAS CAUSED THIS CERTIFICATE TO BE
SIGNED BY ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS AND TO BE SEALED WITH THE SEAL OF THE
CORPORATION.




                                      E-17