alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epolin, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended August  31,  2004,
as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned certifies,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley  Act  of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's  knowledge,
that:

      (1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and

       (2)   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated: December 8, 2004      By: /s/ Murray S. Cohen
                                  Murray S. Cohen,
                                  Chairman of the Board and
                                  Chief Executive Officer


Dated: December 8, 2004      By: /s/ James Ivchenko
                                  James Ivchenko,
                                  President (Principal Financial
                                  Officer)
From:tlicata@babcockpower.com

Sent:Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:54 AM

To:Schaffner, Karen S.

Cc:cerickson@babcockpower.com; rlisauskas@babcockpower.com;

jlangone@babcockpower.com

Karen

Dr. Erickson has asked me to review the paragraph on the Delta Wing mixers. I have added 

my

comments. Please call me if you have any questions.

Thank you for your help.

The Delta Wing mixers have several functions in an SCR. One application is as static

mixers installed in the duct just prior to the SCR reactor and sometimes after the

reactors, there mixers are used to straighten and homogenize the flue gas

(temperature, NOx, and dust) The mixer plates are made of carbon steel and the cost

for installation of the Delta Wing includes the capital cost of the equipment and the

modeling to determine its location to maximize its mixing effect. A second application is

for mixing and injecting ammonia. Because each application of the Delta Wing mixer is

different, it is difficult to cite a cost and Babcock Power typically does not have a

breakout cost for the Delta Wing mixer. A cost for installing the mixer and conducting

the modeling would typically be less than $500,000, although for an SCR that was

originally installed without a static mixer, the cost to retrofit the SCR with a mixer 

could

be up to $1,000,000 to account for the capital, the modeling, and any other retrofit

issues.

Tony

Licat

a

Vice

Presid

ent

Babco

ck

Power

Envir

onme

ntal

Inc.

5

Nepo

nset

Street

Worc

ester,

MA

01606

T:

508-

854-

3853

F:

508-

853-

2572

M:
508-

615-

0317

tlicata

@bab

cockp

ower.

com

http://

www.

babco

ckpo

wer.c

om

********************* Think Before You Print ******************************

This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for the named

recipient(s) and may contain information that is legally privileged,

confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you

have received this message in error and are not the intended recipient(s),

you may not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any

purpose or disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person or

entity. Any such dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or

its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended

recipient(s), please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete

this e-mail and any attachments from your computer.

http://www.babcockpower.com

***************************************************************************
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

Schedule to Form of Executive Employment Agreement

Executed copies of Executive Employment Agreements with Dan Barnea, Darroll
Buytenhuys, Jeffrey Hawn and Deborah Tummins have been omitted. The following
schedule sets forth the material details in which such executed copies differ
from the Form of Executive Employment Agreement filed as an exhibit to the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 and
incorporated herein by reference (the "Form Agreement"). With respect to Darroll
Buytenhuys, such differences were previously filed in the schedule accompanying
the Form Agreement.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Item                     Dan Barnea           Jeffrey Hawn         Deborah Tummins
----                     ----------           ------------         ---------------
<S>                      <C>                  <C>                  <C>
Effective Date           April 1, 2000        July 24, 2000        July 11, 2000

Duties                   VP/GM-ITPA           Sr. VP -             Sr. VP - Field Operations,
                                              BMC Ventures         The Americas

Salary                   $300,000             $350,000             $265,000

Stock Options            50,000               250,000              225,000

Restricted Stock         N/A                  50,000               N/A

Severance:
  Salary Payment         2 years              2 years              2 years
  Bonus Payment          3 year average       3 year average       3 year average

Change of Control:
  Salary Payment         2 years              2 years              2 years
  Bonus Payment          3 year average       3 year average       3 year average
</TABLE>
#### § 366.7 Will the FDIC waive the prohibitions under § 366.3?

We may waive the prohibitions for entities other than individuals for good cause shown at our discretion when our need to contract for your services outweighs all relevant factors. The statute does not allow us to waive the prohibitions for individuals.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT**

**Rules 13A – 14 and 15D -14 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Belen Ramos, the Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-QSB (the “Quarterly Report”) of Dynatem, Inc. (the “Company”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairlypresents in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report; 

 

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report was being prepared;

 

(b) Omitted; 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosed in this Quarterly Report anychange in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter, in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: October 14, 2005
Order filed October 13, 2022. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00638-CV

____________

LIDIA AKLILU HABTETSION, Appellant

V.

SEAN PATRICK NEARY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 507th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-73154

ORDER

The notice of appeal in this case was filed September 1, 2022. To date, the 

appellate filing fee of $205.00 has not been paid by appellant. Moreover, the clerk 

responsible for preparing the record notified this court that appellant has not made 

payment for the record. No evidence that appellant has established indigence has 

been filed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 5, 145. On September 19, 2022, this court notified 

appellant that the court may dismiss the appeal unless she paid the appellate filing 

fee, and on September 22, 2022, this court notified appellant that the appeal was 

subject to dismissal unless appellant filed a response with proof of payment for the 
2

record. No response was filed to either notice. Therefore, the court issues the 

following order.

Appellant is ordered to demonstrate to this court within ten (10) days of the 

date of this order arrangements have been made to pay for the clerk’s record. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Appellant is further ordered to pay the appellate filing fee 

in the amount of $205.00 to the Clerk of this court within ten (10) days of the date 

of this order. If appellant fails to timely comply with either of those orders, the 

appeal will be subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution.

See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Spain, Poissant, and Wilson.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial                           ( print page 52247)                        property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Hepatitis C Cooperative Research Centers (U19).                    

*Date:*                         November 18-20, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Diplomat/Ambassador Room, Bethesda, MD 20814.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Betty Poon, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2660,                         *poonb@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: October 2, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-24362 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, Ching Lung Po, Chief Executive Officer of China
Resources Development, Inc. (the "Company") has executed this certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
(the "Report").

         The undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as
of the 12th day of August, 2002.


                                           /s/
                                           ----------------------------




                                           Name: Ching Lung Po
                                                 -----------------------------
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                                  ----------------------------
§ 328.4 Signs for automated teller machines and like devices. ( a ) *Scope.* This section governs signage for insured depository institutions' automated teller machines or other remote electronic facilities that receive deposits.
( b ) *ATMs or like devices that do not offer access to non-deposit products.* Except as provided in paragraph (e), an insured depository institution's automated teller machine or like device that receives deposits for an insured depository institution and does not offer access to non-deposit products may comply with the official sign requirement of this section by either: ( 1 ) Displaying the physical official sign as described in § 328.2 on the automated teller machine, subject to paragraph (f); or
( 2 ) Displaying the FDIC official digital sign as described in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Display of FDIC official digital sign.* An insured depository institution's automated teller machine or like device that receives deposits for an insured depository institution and offers access to non-deposit products must clearly, continuously, and conspicuously display the FDIC official digital sign as described in § 328.5 on its home page or screen and on each transaction page or screen relating to deposits.
( d ) *Non-deposit signage.* An insured depository institution's automated teller machine or like device that receives deposits for an insured depository institution and offers access to non-deposit products must clearly, continuously, and conspicuously display electronic disclosures indicating that such non-deposit products: are not insured by the FDIC; are not deposits; and may lose value. These disclosures must be displayed on each transaction page or screen relating to non-deposit products. Such signage may not be displayed in close proximity to the FDIC official digital sign.
( e ) *Automated teller machines and like devices placed into service after January 1, 2025.* An insured depository institution's automated teller machine or like device that receives deposits for an insured depository institution and does not offer access to non-deposit products, that is placed into service after January 1, 2025 must display the official digital sign as described in paragraph (c) of this section.
( f ) *Degraded or defaced physical official signs.* A physical official sign that is displayed on an insured depository institution's automated teller machine or like device under paragraph (b)(1) that is degraded or defaced would not be displayed “clearly, continuously, and conspicuously” for purposes of paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
#### STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. NETTIE FLICK, Defendant; OTTO DRUM et al., Appellants.

Kansas-City Court of Appeals*

November 11, 1912.

BAWDY HOUSE: Costs: Prosecuting Witnesses. In a prosecution by information filed by the prosecuting attorney on tbe written affidavit of several complainants, for keeping a bawdy bouse, of which charge the defendant was acquitted, the complainants are not liable for costs as prosecuting witnesses.

Appeal from Cole Circuit *Court.*— Ron. *John M. Williams,*Judge.

*7Reversed and remanded.

*Irwin é Peters*for appellants.

*No Brief*for respondent.

ELLISON, J.

Defendant was charged in an information filed by the prosecuting attorney of Cole county, with keeping a bawdyhouse. The information was filed by the prosecutor upon the complaint of a number of citizens who had filed their affidavit with the clerk of the circuit court. Defendant was found not guilty, whereupon the court rendered judgment against complainants for the costs. There was a motion to retax which being refused, the complainants appealed.

It is provided in section 5095, R. S. 1909, that no indictment for trespass not amounting to a felony, except for petit larceny, or for libel or slander, shall be preferred unless endorsed by the name of the prosecutor. Section 5057 makes the terms and restrictions as to endorsement of witnesses in cases of indictment, applicable to an information. And so does section 5063; and it makes the prosecuting witness, in such cases, liable for the costs if the prosecution fails. A prosecution for keeping a bawdyhouse is not one of the offenses where the prosecuting witness must be endorsed on the indictment, and hence he does not become liable for costs. [State v. Bean, 21 Mo. 267; State v. Raymond, 86 Mo. App. 537.]

Section 5380 provides that every person who shall institute a prosecution to recover a fine, penalty or forfeiture, shall be adjudged to pay the costs if the defendant is acquitted. This section does not apply to a public offense such as keeping a bawdyhouse. [State v. Lavelle, 78 Mo. 104; State v. Huiatt, 31 Mq. App. 302.]

The costs should not be taxed against the appellants, and the judgment is reversed and cause remanded that they may be retaxed.

All concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended April 3, 2004, of MTI Technology Corporation (the
Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Thomas P. Raimondi, Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a)
or Section 780(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. In witness whereof, the undersigned has executed and delivered this
certificate as of the date set forth opposite his signature below. Date: December 22, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ THOMAS P. RAIMONDI. JR.Thomas P. Raimondi, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5280-N-40]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         October 16, 2009                        *.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: October 8, 2009.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. E9-24735 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P