alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Michael S. Kady, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Quipp, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ MICHAEL S. KADY     | 
|Michael S. Kady         | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        | 
|Date:  August 10, 2007  |
#### § 390.301 [Reserved]
§ 351.21 Termination of activities or investments; penalties for violations. ( a ) Any banking entity that engages in an activity or makes an investment in violation of section 13 of the BHC Act or this part, or acts in a manner that functions as an evasion of the requirements of section 13 of the BHC Act or this part, including through an abuse of any activity or investment permitted under subparts B or C, or otherwise violates the restrictions and requirements of section 13 of the BHC Act or this part, shall, upon discovery, promptly terminate the activity and, as relevant, dispose of the investment.
( b ) Whenever the FDIC finds reasonable cause to believe any banking entity has engaged in an activity or made an investment in violation of section 13 of the BHC Act or this part, or engaged in any activity or made any investment that functions as an evasion of the requirements of section 13 of the BHC Act or this part, the FDIC may take any action permitted by law to enforce compliance with section 13 of the BHC Act and this part, including directing the banking entity to restrict, limit, or terminate any or all activities under this part and dispose of any investment.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elephant & Castle Group Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard Bryant, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                      s/Richard Bryant
                                      -----------------------------
                                      Richard Bryant
                                      Chief Executive Officer and
                                      President

Dated: March 9, 2004
§ 622.80 Informal hearing. ( a ) *Time and place.* Upon receipt of a timely petition for a hearing, the Board shall notify the petitioner of the time and place fixed for the hearing and shall designate one or more Board members or FCA employees to preside (“designated FCA representative”). The hearing shall be scheduled to be held no later than 30 days from the date a petition for hearing is received unless the time is extended at the request of the petitioner. Notice of the hearing shall also be sent to the FCA's Office of General Counsel.
( b ) *Appearance.* A petitioner may appear personally or through counsel to submit relevant written materials and oral argument. An attorney is subject to all the requirements and limitations imposed on attorneys in § 622.3 of subpart A. A representative(s) of the FCA's Office of General Counsel may participate in the hearing to the extent such representative deems appropriate.
( c ) *Written material.* Any written material the petitioner wishes to have considered must be submitted to the designated FCA representative and the FCA's Office of General Counsel at least 10 days prior to the date of the hearing.
( d ) *Oral testimony.* Oral testimony may be presented only if expressly permitted by the Board in the notice of hearing. The designated FCA representative may ask questions of any witness.
( e ) *Transcripts.* Oral testimony, if any, and oral argument shall be recorded. A copy of the transcript shall be filed with the designated FCA representative, who shall have authority to correct the record sua sponte upon notice, or upon the motion of the petitioner or the representative of the FCA's Office of General Counsel. The designated FCA representative shall promptly serve notice upon the petitioner and the FCA's Office of General Counsel of such filing. Such parties shall make arrangements with the person recording the testimony or argument for copies of the transcript.
( f ) *Closing of record.* Upon the request of the petitioner or representative of the FCA's Office of General Counsel, the record shall remain open for a period of 5 business days following the hearing, during which time additional submissions for the record may be made. Thereafter, the record shall be closed.
( g ) *Rules of evidence and procedure.* Neither the formal rules of evidence nor the adjudicative procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 554-557) or subpart A of these rules shall apply to the informal hearing ordered under this subpart unless the Board orders that they apply in whole or in part.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25059]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time:  Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 9 a.m.-12:30 p.m.

Place:  Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

Closed Meeting:  The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors 
(BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of 
issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international 
broadcasting. They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and 
personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating 
to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This 
meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose 
matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the 
interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 
U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature 
disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)) 
In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal 
personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International 
Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6))

Contact Person for More Information:  Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203-4545.

Paul Kollmer-Dorsey,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-25059 Filed 10-14-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
I 

j 

l 

I 

I 

Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

i vote Mokulele Airlines. 

Kaipo Vierra <kaipovierra@yahoo.com> 

Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:53 PM 

Faulk, Scott (OST); EAS (OST) 

MOKULELE 4 KALAUPAPA 

Great Customer Service, and they recently landed on the freeway, with no engine. 

now thats my kind of airlines! 

no other airlines ive seen done this 

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         690,576
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  237,352
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (15,488)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,266,939
<PP&E>                                       4,404,975
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,260,605)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,576,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,743,190
<BONDS>                                         22,680
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        860
<COMMON>                                        99,359
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,704,601
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,576,008
<SALES>                                        664,126
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               908,609
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,801,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,942
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,953,803)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,953,803)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,953,803)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.51)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 614.4060 Affiliates established pursuant to section 8.5(e)(1) of the Farm Credit Act of 1971.

An affiliate established by one or more Farm Credit System institutions pursuant to section 8.5(e)(1) of the Act and § 611.1137 of this chapter, as a certified agricultural mortgage marketing facility, may purchase loans from Farm Credit System institutions and institutions other than Farm Credit System institutions in accordance with title VIII of the Act and any applicable regulation promulgated thereunder.

[57 FR 38247, Aug. 24, 1992]
§ 614.4232 Loans to domestic lessors. Loans and financial assistance extended by banks for cooperatives and agricultural credit banks to domestic lessors to finance equipment or facilities leased by a stockholder of the bank shall be subject to the following terms and conditions: ( a ) The term of the loan shall not be longer than the total period of the lease;
( b ) The contract between the lessor and lessee shall establish that the leased assets are effectively under the control of the lessee and that such control shall continue in effect for essentially all of the term of the lease;
( c ) The lessee must hold at least one share of stock or one participation certificate; and
( d ) The leased equipment and facilities must be primarily for use in the lessee's operations in the United States.
[55 FR 24884, June 19, 1990, as amended at 64 FR 34517, June 28, 1999]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐x 

In re:                  PROMESA  

                  Title III 

THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND  

MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, 

  as representative of 

                  No. 17 BK 3283‐LTS  

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al.,                 (Jointly Administered) 

      Debtors.1  

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐x 

ORDER 

  This matter is before the Court on Ambac Assurance Corporation’s Motion for Entry of 

Order Authorizing Discovery Under Bankruptcy Rule 2004 (Dkt. No. 1873) (the “Motion”).  On 

January 5, 2018, the parties to the Motion filed a joint report (Dkt. No. 2222) (“Joint Report”).  

Therein, the parties stated that they would “provide an update to the Court prior to or at the 

February 7 Omnibus Hearing.”  Joint Report at 3.  This Court hereby ORDERS that the parties 

submit such a report on or before January 31, 2018. 

/ s / Judith Gail Dein               

              Judith Gail Dein 

DATED: January 17, 2018        United States Magistrate Judge  

 

1

 The Debtors in these Title III Cases, along with each Debtor’s respective Title III case number and the 

last four (4) digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are the (i) 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3283‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 

3481); (ii) Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3284‐LTS) 

(Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 8474); (iii) Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority 

(“HTA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 3567‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3808); (iv) Employees 

Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”) (Bankruptcy Case 

No. 17 BK 3566‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 9686); and (v) Puerto Rico Electric Power 

Authority (“PREPA”) (Bankruptcy Case No. 17 BK 4780‐LTS) (Last Four Digits of Federal Tax ID: 3747) 

(Title III case numbers are listed as Bankruptcy Case numbers due to software limitations). 

   

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2261 Filed:01/17/18 Entered:01/18/18 09:26:08 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
COMPANY                                                   STATE OF INCORPORATION

eMarketplace, Inc.                                        Delaware
         Top Team, Inc.                                   Delaware
               Full Moon Interactive Group, Inc.          California
               Orrell Communications, Inc.                California
               Muccino Design Group, Inc.                 California
               DeVries Data Systems, Inc.                 Delaware
               Oncourse Network, Inc.                     Delaware
               Image Network, Inc.                        California

         E-Taxi, Inc.                                     Delaware
               Techstore, Inc.                            Delaware
                      Office Express, Inc.                Delaware

         Starsonline, Inc.                                Delaware

         Tri-Step Acquisistion, Inc.                      Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-QSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                            7087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  600,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                   425,000
<INVENTORY>                                    859,910
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,042,764
<PP&E>                                         154,378
<DEPRECIATION>                                 142,696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,057,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,365,343
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    220,000
<COMMON>                                        12,885
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,057,457
<SALES>                                        312,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               312,838
<CGS>                                          251,975
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  251,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               918,670
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,408
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (901,515)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (902,515)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (902,515)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)
<FN>
<F1>The net loss per share has been restated to retroactively effect a reverse 
stock split in the ratio of one share for ten shares.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 26, 2012

h0319 

# Order

March 26, 2012

143860

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143860 COA: 300874 Wayne CC: 06-007508-01 DEANDRE STEVEN HENRY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 30, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

H ATHAWAY



### , J., not participating. Justice Ha thaway recuses herself and will not participate in this case as sh e was the presiding trial cour t judge. See MCR 2.003(B).
Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
 Exhibit 32
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 /s/ John A. KraeutlerJohn A. KraeutlerChief Executive OfficerFebruary 8, 2010/s/ Melissa LuekeMelissa LuekeExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerFebruary 8, 2010
output_EmissionLocation

FacilityID SourceID LocationTypeLongitude Latitude UTMzone SourceTypeLengthx Lengthy Angle HorzDim VertDim AreaVolReleaseHgt StackHgt_m StackDiameter_m ExitGasVel_m ExitGasTemp_K Elevation_mHillHeight

Page 1
#### GREENMAN *v.*GILLERMAN’S ESTATE.

Trial — Issue—Question for Jury.

On the retrial of a case reversed by this court because of a directed verdict for defendant, where the case made by plaintiff was even stronger than in the former action, the court below was not in error in refusing to direct a verdict for defendant

Error to Kent; McDonald, J.

Submitted January 10, 1917.

(Docket No. 16.)

Decided March 30, 1917.

Esther Greenman presented a claim against the estate of August Gillerman, deceased, for the support of an adopted child. From an allowance of the claim the administrator appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for claimant. Defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

*476
      *C. C. Coburn,*for appellant.

*E. A. Maher,*for appellee.

Moore, J.

This, case has been here before and is reported in 188 Mich. 74 (154 N. W. 82). In the opinion filed there is a somewhat detailed statement of facts, by consulting which it will be unnecessary to make a long statement here.

After the opinion was handed down, the case was tried before a jury. From a judgment in favor of the claimant in the amount of $312.50, the case is brought here by writ of error.

The assignments, are grouped under three heads:

> (1) It is said the court erred in not directing a verdict for the defendant.

> (2) It is said the court erred in his. rulings, upon the reception of evidence.

> (3) It is said the court erred in his charge to the jury.

1. This is the important assignment of error. Upon the second trial the claimant presented substantially the same case which was passed upon by this court, perhaps making a stronger case than before. We are still of the opinion that the case made by the claimant made a case for the jury.

It would profit no one to discuss the other assignments of error. An examination of the record does not show reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff.

Kuhn, C. J., and Stone, Ostrander, Bird, Steere, Brooke, and Fellows, JJ., concurred.