alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 611.1265 Retirement of a terminating association's investment in its affiliated bank. ( a ) *Safety and soundness restrictions.* Notwithstanding anything in this subpart to the contrary, we may prohibit a bank from retiring the equities you hold in the bank if the retirement would cause the bank to fall below its regulatory capital requirements after retirement, or if we determine that the bank would be in an unsafe or unsound condition after retirement.
( b ) *Retirement agreement.* Your affiliated bank may retire the purchased and allocated equities held by your institution in the bank according to the terms of the bank's capital revolvement plan or an agreement between you and the bank.
( c ) *Retirement in absence of agreement.* Your affiliated bank must retire any equities not subject to an agreement or revolvement plan no later than when you or the successor institution pays off your loan from the bank.
( d ) *No retirement of unallocated surplus.* When your bank retires equities you own in the bank, the bank must pay par or face value for purchased and allocated equities, less any impairment. The bank may not pay you any portion of its unallocated surplus.
( e ) *Exclusion of equities from capital ratios.* If another Farm Credit institution makes an agreement to retire equities you hold in that institution after termination, we may require that institution to exclude part or all of those equities from assets and capital when the institution calculates its regulatory capital under parts 615 and 628 of this chapter.
[71 FR 44420, Aug. 4, 2006, as amended at 81 FR 49772, July 28, 2016]
#### § 608.807 Right to inspect and copy records.

The debtor may inspect and copy the FCA records related to the claim. The debtor shall give the FCA reasonable advance notice that it intends to inspect and copy the records involved. The debtor shall pay copying costs unless they are waived by the FCA. Copying costs shall be assessed pursuant to §§ 602.11 and 602.12 of this chapter.

[59 FR 13187, Mar. 21, 1994, as amended at 71 FR 54900, Sept. 20, 2006]
W6390 Challenger Drive, Suite 203  Appleton, WI54914 - 9120 Phone: 920
- 739 - 5123  Fax: 920 - 739 - 1325 February 29 , 20 1 6 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M
- 30 West Building ground floor Room W12 - 140 1200 New Jersey

Avenue, SE. Washington, D.C. 20590 Dear Sir: RE: Docket number FAA
- 2001 - 10221 Pursuant to 14CFR 11.61, Air Wiscons in Airlines Corporation petitions the Administrator for an extension to Exemption 7778 which allows for qualified and a uthorized compan y check airman to conduct the observation of a new PIC required b y 14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii). Air Wisconsin Airlines is n ot requesting an y changes to the current exemption. Air Wisconsin Airlines has captains being trained monthly . The use of this exemption will allow for timely

observations of captain candidates and thus allow them to be productive. The rest of the justi fication remains the same. Granting this extension would:  Allow the FAA greater flexibility and better use of its inspection force by focusing on higher priority safet y functions;  Allow Air Wisconsin Airlines the opportunity to have the observation comple ted during Operating Experience instead of having to reschedule it after the Operating Experience is essentiall y complete except for the observation, thereb y allowing the pilot to immediately

become productive.  Allow Air Wisconsin Airlines the opportunity to significantly increase use of qualified pilots and improve its ability to provide an on
- time, dependable air service to the public; and  Allow Air Wisconsin Airlines the opportunity to reduce the unnecessary cost of wages and lost productivity for those qualified pilots waiting for FAA observation. These costs eventuall y are passed on to the traveling public.– 2

– March 6, 2016

No Adverse Effect on Safety Granting an extension of this exemption would have no adverse effect on safety because:  The check airman authorized to conduct the observation will be highl y trained and experienced with the particular airplane ty pe and will be approved by the FAA;  The check airman will be used to fulfill 14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii) onl y when a qualified FAA inspector is not available;  The FAA continues to have the authority to observe an y pilot an y time during line operations
While Air Wisconsin Airlines does not see an y need for publication in the Federal Register, the following is offered as a summary for publication if necessary: Ai r Wisconsin Airlines Corporation Petitions for an extension to Exemption 7778 Air Wisconsin Airlines Corporation petitions for an extension to Exemption 7778 which allows for the FAA, at their discretion, to allow a FAA designated Company Check airman to conduct the Captain Observation as required by 14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii) when an FAA inspector is not available in a timel y manner. This exemption is subject to certain conditions and limitations as stated in the exemption
. Sincerel y
Michael S. Melott e Flight Training Standards Development Manager (920) 749
- 7534 Michael.melotte @airwis.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         83,338
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  519,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,500
<INVENTORY>                                    836,379
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,705,476
<PP&E>                                       1,204,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                 579,965
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,686,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          860,299
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                        10,979
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,913,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,686,117
<SALES>                                      1,761,845
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,761,845
<CGS>                                          871,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  762,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   796
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,631
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 82,860
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (6,553)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             89,413
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                    89,413
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated February 17, 2005, with respectto the consolidated financial statements of Human Genome Sciences, Inc., Human Genome Sciences,Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Human Genome Sciences, Inc.included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004, in the followingRegistration Statements:   (1) Registration Statement Number 33-79020 on Form S-8(2) Registration Statement Number 33-79022 on Form S-8(3) Registration Statement Number 333-85319 on Form S-3(4) Registration Statement Number 333-96387 on Form S-3(5) Registration Statement Number 333-33252 on Form S-3(6) Registration Statement Number 333-36384 on Form S-3(7) Registration Statement Number 333-44798 on Form S-8(8) Registration Statement Number 333-45272 on Form S-3(9) Registration Statement Number 333-47292 on Form S-3(10) Registration Statement Number 333-66670 on Form S-8(11) Registration Statement Number 333-89392 on Form S-8(12) Registration Statement Number 333-104219 on Form S-8(13) Registration Statement Number 333-121724 on Form S-3
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
McLean, Virginia
§ 303.248 Truth in Lending Act—Relief from reimbursement. ( a ) *Scope.* This section applies to requests for relief from reimbursement pursuant to the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1601 *et seq.*) and Regulation Z (12 CFR part 226). Related delegations of authority are also set forth.
( b ) *Procedures to be followed in filing initial requests for relief.* Requests for relief from reimbursement shall be filed with the appropriate FDIC office or within 60 days after receipt of the compliance report of examination containing the request to conduct a file search and make restitution to affected customers. The filing shall contain a complete and concise statement of the action requested, all relevant facts, the reasons and analysis relied upon as the basis for such requested action, and all supporting documentation.
( c ) *Additional information.* The FDIC may request additional information at any time during processing of any such requests.
( d ) *Processing.* The FDIC will acknowledge receipt of the request for reconsideration and provide the applicant with written notification of its determination within 60 days of its receipt of the request for reconsideration.
( e ) *Procedures to be followed in filing requests for reconsideration.* Within 15 days of receipt of written notice that its request for relief has been denied, the requestor may petition the appropriate FDIC office for reconsideration of such request in accordance with the procedures set forth in§ 303.11(f).
[67 FR 79247, Dec. 27, 2002. Redesignated at 71 FR 20526, Apr. 21, 2006]
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22358-1 Filed:09/21/22 Entered:09/22/22 13:07:22 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 1
1

The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of

Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jonathan G.

Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-2416

___________

Paul Reyes, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Sergeant Galland; M. Rustand; John *

Does, 1 - 2, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: December 14, 2001 

 Filed: December 27, 2001

___________

Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Inmate Paul Reyes appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of his lawsuit against

corrections employees for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. He also appeals the denial of

his motion for reconsideration. Upon de novo review, we affirm for the reasons explained

by the district court. We also find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of the

motion for reconsideration. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court and

the order denying reconsideration. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Order entered May 26, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00338-CV

FREDERICK E. MCDONALD, IV, Appellant

V.

EMILY MCDONALD, Appellee

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-07-09019

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s May 22, 2015 second motion for an extension of time to file a 

brief. Appellant shall file a brief by JULY 8, 2015. We caution appellant that no further 

extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
§ 313.83 Form of hearing. ( a ) If the debtor submits a timely written request for a hearing as provided in § 313.82(c), the FDIC will afford the debtor a hearing, which at the FDIC's option may be oral or written. The FDIC will provide the debtor with a reasonable opportunity for an oral hearing when the Director determines that the issues in dispute cannot be resolved by review of the documentary evidence, for example, when the validity of the claim turns on the issue of credibility or veracity.
( b ) If the FDIC determines that an oral hearing is appropriate, the time and location of the hearing shall be established by the FDIC. An oral hearing may, at the debtor's option, be conducted either in person or by telephone conference. All travel expenses incurred by the debtor in connection with an in-person hearing will be borne by the debtor. All telephonic charges incurred during the hearing will be the responsibility of the agency.
( c ) In cases when it is determined that an oral hearing is not required by this section, the FDIC will accord the debtor a “paper hearing,” that is, the FDIC will decide the issues in dispute based upon a review of the written record.
# C_2014217EN.01000901.xml

| 10.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/9

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2014/C 217/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 19 March 2014 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 74977 |
| Decision number | : | 123/14/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | NCE Micro and Nanotechnology innovation cluster |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement |
| Type of measure | : | Individual aid for cluster animation |
| Objective | : | Promotion of innovation |
| Form of aid | : | Grant |
| Budget | : | Overall budget: NOK 60 million |
| Duration | : | Until July 2016 |
| Economic sectors | : | Manufacturing industry. Electrical and optical equipment |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Innovation Norway |
| PO Box 448 |
| Sentrum, Akersgata 13 |
| NO-0104 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

19 March 2014

Case number

Case number

:

74977

Decision number

Decision number

:

123/14/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

NCE Micro and Nanotechnology innovation cluster

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Individual aid for cluster animation

Objective

Objective

:

Promotion of innovation

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Grant

Budget

Budget

:

Overall budget: NOK 60 million

Duration

Duration

:

Until July 2016

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Manufacturing industry. Electrical and optical equipment

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Innovation Norway

PO Box 448

Sentrum, Akersgata 13

NO-0104 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
#### GLOUCESTER CITY TRUST COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT B. GOODFELLOW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued October 21, 1939

Decided January 25, 1940.

For the defendant-appellant, *David R. Rose.*

For the plaintiff-respondent, *Louis B.*LeDuc.

*119The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

The appellant was the endorser upon a promissory note owned by the respondent. A premature default judgment, previously entered, was set aside. *Gloucester City Trust Co.*v. *Goodfellow,*121 *N. J. L.*546. Thereafter, a rule to plead being taken an answer was filed which was properly struck since it was insufficient in law. *N. J. S. A.*2:27-124.

The answer, in various forms, pleads that the respondent having taken a bond and mortgage to secure its note was precluded by the foreclosure thereof from any recovery upon the note, and further that it was precluded from any action upon the note, except in accordance with the provisions of *R. S.*2:65-2 *et seq.*The decisions of this court in *Chodosh*v. *Schlesinger,*119 *N. J. L.*405, and *Asbury Park and Ocean Grove Bank*v. *Giordano,*3 *N. J. Mis. R.*555; *affirmed,*103 *N. J. L.*171, are to the contrary.

The respondent, holding a note unpaid at maturity, could pursue its remedy thereon in spite of anything that appears in the answer. The note was an independent obligation for which the bank had held security. Certainly, after the exhaustion thereof, it could look to the maker and endorser of the note for payment of'that which remained due.

*R. S.*2:65-2 *et seq.*applies only to a,n action on the bond where a mortgage has been given as security therefor. *Sivade*v. *Smith,*104 *N. J. Eq.*528.

Other arguments made by the learned counsel for the appellant have been carefully considered but require no further discussions because they are adversely ruled in the cases cited.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

*For affirmance*—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 14.

*For reversal*—None.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          66,185                  70,229
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,222                   1,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                         596,517               1,432,162
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,214,565               3,049,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,632                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,212,933               3,049,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,214,565               3,049,741
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               317,854                   2,308
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,105                  20,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                293,749                 (18,079)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            293,749                 (18,079)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   293,749                 (18,079)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 621.30 General.

Each Farm Credit institution must ensure the independence of all qualified public accountants conducting the institution's audit by establishing and maintaining policies and procedures governing the engagement of external auditors. The policies and procedures must incorporate the provisions of this subpart and § 612.2180 of this chapter.

[71 FR 76120, Dec. 20, 2006, as amended at 86 FR 58559, Oct. 22, 2021]
##### 



Exhibit 12
 
 Year Ended December 31,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes and minority interest
    
    $
    60.5
    
    
    $
    (17.8
    )
    
    $
    62.2
    
    
    $
    (97.3
    )Less: Equity in earnings of 50%-or-less owned
companies
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Add: Fixed charges net of capitalized interest
    
    
    40.1
    
    
    
    42.5
    
    
    
    41.0
    
    
    
    36.8Add: Amortization expense of previously capitalized
interest
    
    
    1.2
    
    
    
    1.2
    
    
    
    1.2
    
    
    
    1.2Total earnings
    
    
    101.8
    
    
    
    25.9
    
    
    
    104.4
    
    
    
    (59.3
    )Fixed charges
    
    
    40.1
    
    
    
    42.5
    
    
    
    41.0
    
    
    
    36.8Ratio of
earnings to fixed charges(b)
    
    
    2.5
    
    
    
    0.6
    
    
    
    2.5
    
    
    
    96.1
    (a)(a)  Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $96.1 million and $162.8 million
in 2003 and 2002, respectively.(b)  The ratio of earnings to
fixed charges is not applicable for 2007 as a result of the
redemption of the Notes on March 7, 2007.