Equal Employment Opportunity Data Posted
Pursuant to the No Fear Act:
OPIC Internal Complaint Activity

Data as of September 30, 2006

29 CFR §1614.704(a) - (c) 29 CFR §1614.705 Comparative Data
FY2006 Previous Fiscal Year Data
‘Complaint Activity end of
FY 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
Number of Complaints Filed in FY 1614.704(a) Ol 7] 7] q 7] 7
Number of Complainants 1614.704(b) q 7] 7] q G) 7] 7
Repeat Filers 1614.704(c) q 7 0} q 0) 0) 0)
29 CFR §1614.704(d) 29 CFR §1614.705 Comparative Data
Complaints by Basis Fv2006 Previous Fiscal Year Data
2005 | 2004 [2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
Race ol ol ol ol i i Fl
[Color 0) QO) ol | q 0} |
Religion ql al AJ | q G) q
[National Origin | 0} a] 7 q q
[Sex (including complaints filed under Equal Pay Act) qj 7] 7 ql 7 7] 7]
Disability a] 7 a} q 7 q 0
Age 0) q | q 0) q q
Reprisal ol 7] | a 0 q 1]
Other 9 7 G) 7 0} 9 7
29 CFR §1614.704(e) 29 CFR §1614.705 Comparative Data
FY2006 Previous Fiscal Year Data
Complaints by Issue end of
FY 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
[Appointment/Hire 7 G) qj Gy) qj J 0
[Assignment of Duties A G) | 7 q| 7 oj
[Awards G) | | 0 G) a} oj
[Conversion to Full-time a} ol 0 "J ql o} 0}
Disciplinary Action
emotion 7 7 7 7 7 7 oj
Reprimand o} ol q 0} ql ol ql
Suspension qj q q oj | | 7]
Removal ql q q ql 0 G) 7]
‘Other q q 0 ql q | q
Duty Hours q q G) oj q | q
[Evaluation Appraisal q 7] 7 | q Gy) Q
Examination/Test q oJ q] q q | 9
Harassment
Non-Sexual 7 7] 7 7 7 7 7
Sexual d ny ol a a a
Medical Examination q ) oj q q q q
Pay (Including Overtime) o) a} q q q q
Promotion/Non-Selection c) 0} a} q q q
Reassignment
Denied 7 Gy) q| 7 7 q Ql
Directed 0) 0) 0) q q 1] q
Reasonable Accommodation 0) 0} 0} q q q q
Reinstatement G) 7 0) q q 7 7
Retirement i) 0} Q) q q q q
Termination 0) 7 0} q 7 0 7
[Terms/Conditions of Employment 7 7 ql q 7 0 0)
[Time and Attendance oJ oJ a} q q q
Training 0} y) ql q q ql q
Other A 7 G) q q | 9



Section

Subject Matter

Comment

and regulations. OPIC also has
implemented EEO policies to
ensure that it recruits, retains, and
promotes a highly qualified and
diverse workforce based on merit
and equal employment opportunity.
OPIC also has committed to
training its employees and
managers on their EEO rights and
responsibilities.

(D) any actions planned or taken to
improve complaint or civil rights
programs of the agency.

We intend to build upon the
foundation laid in FYs2005 and
2006, which includes continued
training, as needed, on the various
Federal anti-discrimination statutes;
updating our policy statements
annually, and making effective use
of our newly developed internal
EEO website.

Additionally, during FY2007, OPIC
will engage in strategic workforce
planning. As part of this effort, one
guiding principle will be the goal of
an inclusive workplace and work
environment free from
discrimination. We will develop an
EEO strategic plan that fully
integrates EEO principles into all
aspects of human resources
management. Our EEO strategic
plan will be aligned with OPIC’s
mission and goals.

203(a)(8)

Any adjustment (to the extent the
adjustment can be ascertained in the
budget of the agency) to comply
with the requirements under section
201.

Not applicable.



25 CFR §1614.704(f)
Processing Time "...post the average length of time it takes to FY2006
complete each step of the process for every complaint that is
pending during any time of the then fiscal yea
Average
Number] 4verag
[All complaints pending in Investigative Stage 1614.704(0) 7 q
[All complaints pending in Final Agency Action Stage 7 q
IAI complaints pending in which Hearing was not 1614.704(F(2) q q
requested
Time Tn Investigation Stage 7 7
Time to issue Final Agency Action 7 0)
[Ail complaints pending in which a Hearing was requested |1614,704((3) q q
Time in Investigation Stage q q
‘Time to issue Final Agency Action a 7
29 CFR §1614.704(g) 29 CFR §1614.705 Comparative Data
Complaints Dismissed by Agency Pursuant to Fvzote Brevious Fiscal Yeor Data)
1614.107(a)
end of
FY 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 _[ 2000
FFotal Complaints Dismissed by Agency q q of fF oO q 1
[Average days pending prior to dismissal q oof 2a0f 9 q 5
25 GFR §1614,704(h) 29 CFR §1614.705 Comparative Data
FY2006 Previous Fiscal Year Data
Total Final Agency Actions Finding Discrimination
FY 2005 2004 2003 2002 [2001 [2000
z % # [*|# | "| # % l# [lal | # | %
FFotal Number Findings 704(R)(A) q 0) v) q q q
[Without Wearing 704(h)(2) c) c) q q 0) q
With Hearing 704(h)(3) c) c) q q " q
2 CER §1614, 704) 729 CFR §1614.705 Comparative Data
FY2006
Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Basis er
FY 2005 2004 2003 2002 [2001 [2000
z % # % | # | % | # % |e [el#l | # | ©
FTotal Number Findings 704()(4) q q q q q q q
Number Findings Rendered Without Hearing q q q q q q 7
7oacin2)
Number Findings Rendered q 7” r) q q q c)
After Hearing 704(1)(3)
Race q q q q q 4 a q
Color q d q qo q q
Religion q q d q qq Q d
National Origin q d d q qo q q
Sex (include Equal Pay Act) q d q q 4 q q
Disability q q d q qo A q
Age q d q qo q q
Reprisal q d q qo q q



OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20527, USA

OFFICE OF THE
PRESIDENT

April 10, 2007

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Speaker of the House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Madame Speaker:

Enclosed for your information is a copy of the FY 2006 Annual Report of the Overseas
Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) required by Section 203 of the Notification and
Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002, (“No FEAR Act”),
Public Law 107-174.

If I can be of further assistance please let me know.

Si

Robert Mosbach, Jr.
President & CEO

Enclosure

1100 NEW YORK AVE., N. W. - WASHINGTON, D. C. 20527 - FAX (202) 408-5133 - (202) 336-8401


29 CFR §1614.704(i) 29 CFR §1614.705 Comparative Data

FY2006 Previous Fiscal Year Data
Findings of Discrimination Rendered by Issue end of
FY 2005 2004 2003 2002 [2001 2000
# cA # % # % = % | # | % % | # T %

[Total Number Findings 704(3)(1)

Findings Without Hearing 704(j)(2)

Findings After Hearing 704(j)(3)

[Appointment/Hire

[Assignment of Duties

Awards

[Conversion to Full-time

Disciplinary Action

Demotion’

Reprimand

‘Suspension

Removal

Other

[Duty Hours

[Evaluation Appraisal

[Examination/Test

[Harassment

Non-Sexual

Sexual

[Medical Examination

Pay (Including Overtime)

[Promotion/Non-Selection

[Reassianment.

Denied

Directed

[Reasonable Accommodation

Reinstatement

Retirement

[Termination

[Terms/Conditions of Employment

[Time and Attendance

[Training

slo} clolololo| olololo} ofc} ololo} of} o| ol} of ol ol ola} ol ol ola} oa} ol ol*

elol ol olololol clolelol o}o] lola} of 0] of ol} ol ol ololol of ol ola} a} oo
elol ol olelolel clolelol ofa] clolo} of 0] o| 0/0] of ol co} ola} of ol oo} ol clo
elol clo} ololol clolelol o}o} oo} 0] a1 0] o| clo} of of cfolo} ola} ola} of ol ol
elol clo} olo}o} clolelo} o}} oo} 0] of e} o| ola} of of cfolo ola} ola} of ol ol
elc| ol clelole| olelelo| alo] clo} ol ofa} o| oo] of co} of ola} a} a} oo} of alo
elol clololelol ololelo| o}o} ofo}o] oo] ol ola] ol ol lola} of ol of 0} of of a

(other

29 CFR §1614.704(k) 29 CFR §1614.705 Comparative Data
Complaints Pending From Previous Fiscal Years by | FY2006 Previous Fiscal Year Data
Status end of
FY 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
FTotal complaints from previous Fiscal Years 704(k)(1) v) 7 q 7] q] 7 2
FTotal Complainants 704(k)(2) ) 7] q 7] 7] 2 2
Number complaints pending: 704(k)(3)
Investigation 7 7 7 7 7 7 q
ROT issued, pending Complainant's action 7q q q q q al 0
Hearing c) 1 q q q 7 q
Final Agency Action q a} a} al 7] al 7]
‘Appeal with EEOC Office of Federal Operations c) O} 7 " q ql q
29 CFR §1614.704(1) 29 CFR §1614.705 Comparative Data
Fy2006 Previous Fiscal Year Data
Complaint Investigations enki
FY 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
Number Pending Completion of Investigation q q 1 ql q 7 q

Pending Investigations Over Required Time Frames 7 q oJ oJ 0} 0 0}



OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

Annual Report

on the

Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002
(“No FEAR Act”)

Fiscal Year 2006

Section

Subject Matter

l Comment

203(a)(1)

The number of cases arising under
each of the respective provisions of
law covered by paragraphs (1) and
(2) of section 201(a) in which
discrimination on the part of the
agency was alleged.

203(a)(2)

The status or disposition of cases
described in paragraph (1).

None.

203(a)(3)

The amount of money required to be
reimbursed by such agency under
section 201 in connection with each
such cases, separately identifying
the aggregate amount of such
reimbursements attributable to the
payment of attorneys’ fees, if any.

None.

203(a)(4)

The number of employees
disciplined for discrimination,
retaliation, harassment, or any other
infraction of any provision of law
referred to in paragraph (1).

None.

203(a)(5)

The final year-end data posted under
section 301(c)(1)(B) for such fiscal
year (without regard to section
301(c)(2)).

See attached Equal Employment
Opportunity Data Posted Pursuant
to the No FEAR Act for FY 2006.

203(a)(6)

A detailed description of--

(A) the policy implemented by that
agency relating to appropriate
disciplinary actions against a Federal
employee who

(i) discriminated against any
individual in violation of any of the
laws cited under section 201(a)(1) or
(2); or

None.



Section

Subject Matter

Comment

(ii) committed another prohibited
personnel practice that was revealed
in the investigation of a complaint
alleging a violation of any of the
laws cited under section 201(a)(1) or
(2); and

(B) with respect to each of such
laws, the number of employees who
are disciplined in accordance with
such policy and the specific nature
of the disciplinary action taken.

203(a)(7)

An analysis of the information
described under paragraphs (1)
though (6) (in conjunction with data
provided to the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission in
compliance with part 1614 of title 29
of the Code of Federal Regulations),
including:

(A) an examination of trends;

OPIC’s annual workforce between
Fiscal Years (FYs) 2000 and 2006
averaged 205 employees. Although
OPIC averaged approximately one
complaint annually between FYs
2000 and 2005, no complaints were
filed in FY 2006. This level of
complaint activity does not allow a
trend analysis by bases and/or
issues. We attribute the low-level of
complaint activity to our Human
Resources Management policies as
well as the effectiveness of our
EEO program.

(B) causal analysis;

Since OPIC’s complaint activity
does not lend itself to a trend
analysis, we are unable to conduct a
corresponding causal analysis.

(C) practical knowledge gained
through experience; and

OPIC recognizes the importance of
policies that support EEO in the
workplace, and has committed itself
to ensuring that it is in full
compliance with relevant EEO laws