alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 268.709 Communications. ( a ) The Board shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The Board shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the Board. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the Board shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with a disability.
( ii ) The Board need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the Board communicates with employees and others by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used.
( b ) The Board shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The Board shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the Board to take any action that would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where the Board believes that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the Board has the burden of proving that compliance with section 268.709 would result in such alterations or burdens. The determination that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the Board of Governors or their designee after considering all Board resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the Board shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with a disability receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the period ended March 31, 2011:





1. Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.





Date:  May 26, 2011





/s/ David A. BuckelDavid A. Buckel, Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.1.2

                               LETTER AGREEMENT
                         AMENDING EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


April 1, 2000


Dear Mr. Strauss:

Reference is hereby made to your employment agreement, dated August 26, 1999
(the "Employment Agreement"), with American Home Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company").  This letter hereby amends and restates Section 6(a) of the
Employment Agreement to read in its entirety as follows:

     "(a)  During the period from the commencement of the term of this Agreement
     until December 31, 1999, the Company shall pay the Executive, and the
     Executive agrees to accept, a base salary at the rate of not less than
     $130,000 per year.  Commencing January 1, 2000 and for the remainder of the
     term of this Agreement, the Company shall pay to the Executive, and the
     Executive agrees to accept, a base salary of not less than $350,000 per
     year, with increases in such rate in accordance with the Company's regular
     administrative practices of salary increases applicable to senior officers
     from time to time during the term of this Agreement (being hereinafter
     referred to as the "Base Salary").  The Base Salary shall be paid in
     installments no less frequently than monthly.  Any increase in Base Salary
     or other compensation shall not limit or reduce any other obligation of the
     Company hereunder, and once established at an increased specified rate, the
     Executive's Base Salary hereunder shall not thereafter be reduced."

Other than the amendment expressly set forth herein, the terms of the Employment
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

Kindly acknowledge your acceptance of the term of this letter agreement by
signing below and returning the signed original to the Company.  Please keep a
copy of this letter agreement for your files.

Sincerely,

/s/ Michael Strauss
_______________________________________
Michael Strauss
President and Chief Executive Officer


                                                      Acknowledged and Accepted:

                                                      /s/ Michael Strauss
                                                      __________________________
                                                      Michael Strauss
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(b)

                        OPINION AND CONSENT OF ACTUARY
<PAGE>

               [Transamerica Life Insurance Company Letterhead]

May 25, 2001


Transamerica Life Insurance Company
4333 Edgewood Road NE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52499-0001

Re:  Premier Asset Builder Variable Annuity
     Separate Account VA F
     Registration on Form N-4

Dear Sir/Madam:

With regard to the above registration statement, I have examined such documents
and made such inquiries as I have deemed necessary and appropriate, and on the
basis of such examination, have the following opinions:

Fees and charges deducted under the Premier Asset Builder Variable Annuity
policies are those deemed necessary to appropriately reflect:

(1)      the expenses incurred in the acquisition and distribution of the
         policies,

(2)      the expenses associated with the development and servicing of the
         policies,

(3)      the assumption of certain risks arising from the operation and
         management of the policies and/or riders to the policy and that
         provides for a reasonable margin of profit.

Fees and charges assessed against the policy values in the variable account
include:

(i)      Service Charge and Administrative Charge

(ii)     Mortality and Expense Risk Fee (M&E)

(iii)    Taxes (including premium and other taxes if applicable)

(iv)     Surrender Charges

(v)      Any applicable rider fees or charges
<PAGE>

Transamerica Life Insurance Company
May 25, 2001
Page 2



The magnitude of each of the individual charges listed above in (i) through (v)
is established in the pricing of the Premier Asset Builder Variable Annuity, to
achieve a reasonable Return on Investment (ROI), which is within the range of
industry practice with respect to comparable variable annuity products.

Except by coincidence, it is not expected that actual charges assessed in a
given year would exactly offset actual expenses incurred. Acquisition expenses
(as well as major product and/or systems development expenses) are incurred "up
front" and recovered, with a reasonable profit margin, through future years'
charges. In addition, the company cannot increase certain charges under the
policies in the pricing process.

Therefore, in my opinion, the fees and charges deducted under the policies, in
the aggregate, are reasonable in relation to the services rendered, the expenses
expected to be incurred, and the risks assumed by the company.

I hereby consent to the use of this opinion, which is included as an Exhibit to
the registration statement.

/s/ R. Gene Hauser
------------------------------------
R. Gene Hauser
Associate Actuary
Transamerica Life Insurance Company
# C_2011344EN.01000901.xml

| 24.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/9

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 26 July 2011

in Case E-4/11

Arnulf Clauder

(Directive 2004/38/EC — Family reunification — Right of residence for family members of EEA nationals holding a right of permanent residence — Condition to have sufficient resources)

2011/C 344/06

In Case E-4/11 Arnulf Clauder — REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Verwaltungsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein (Administrative Court of the Principality of Liechtenstein), concerning the interpretation of Article 16(1) in conjunction with Article 7(1) of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Benedikt Bogason (ad hoc), Judges, gave judgment on 26 July 2011, the operative part of which is as follows:

Article 16(1) of Directive 2004/38/EC is to be interpreted such that an EEA national with a right of permanent residence, who is a pensioner and in receipt of social welfare benefits in the host EEA State, may claim the right to family reunification even if the family member will also be claiming social welfare benefits.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 10.15

April 1, 1996




Mr. Nickolas Palin
Rexall Sundown, Inc.
851 Broken Sound Parkway, N.W.
Boca Raton, Florida 33487

Dear Nick:

Reference is hereby made to the Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") dated
April 1, 1995 between Rexall Sundown, Inc. (the "Company") and Nickolas Palin
(the "Employee").  Effective the date hereof, the Company and the Employee have
agreed to amend Section 3.1 of the Agreement by deleting Section 3.1 in its
entirety and including the following provision in lieu thereof:

     "3.1 Salary.  In payment for the obligations to be performed by the
Employee during the Term, the Company shall pay to the Employee (subject to any
applicable payroll and/or taxes required to be withheld) annual compensation
("Annual Compensation") equal to (i) a salary of Two Hundred Seventy Five
Thousand Dollars ($275,000) in cash commencing April 1, 1996 and (ii) for each
succeeding year during the Term, a salary equal to that of the previous year
increased by the greater of (A) 5% or (B) the increase in the cost of living
based upon the Revised Consumer Price Index (1982-84=100) published by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor for Boca
Raton, Florida utilizing April 1995 as the base month."

If the foregoing is in accordance with our understanding, please execute the
enclosed copy of this letter and return to the undersigned.

Very truly yours,

REXALL SUNDOWN, INC.


By: /s/ Carl DeSantis 
    ----------------------------
    Carl DeSantis,
    Chairman of the Board

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED this 1st day of April 1996.

      /s/ Nickolas Palin
-------------------------------
          Nickolas Palin
[Stock Certificate Border Graphics]

        Not Valid Unless Countersigned by Transfer Agent
        Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Nevada


     Number                                            Shares

  [No. of Cert]                                 [No. of Shares]


                   CHARTER RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL
           Authorized Common Stock: 100,000,000 Shares
                     Par Value: $.002        CUSIP NO. 16132W 10 6


THIS CERTIFIES THAT  [Name of Shareholder]

IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF  [Number of Shares]

      Shares of CHARTER RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL Common Stock

transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly
authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed.  This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by
the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

     Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the
facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.

Dated:  [date of Certificate]


/s/Richard F. Fatigati                   /s/Lawrence J. Muno
     Secretary                                 Chairman


                 [Graphic of Corporate Seal]

[Border Graphics]

Interwest Transfer Co. Inc. P.O. Box 17136/Salt Lake City, Utah 84117

Countersigned & Registered ______________________________
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEarth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) scanner instrument anomaly investigationThe results of an ad-hoc committee investigation of in-Earth orbit operational anomalies noted on two identical Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) Scanner instruments on two different spacecraft busses is presented. The anomalies are attributed to the bearings and the lubrication scheme for the bearings. A detailed discussion of the pertinent instrument operations, the approach of the investigation team and the current status of the instruments now in Earth orbit is included. The team considered operational changes for these instruments, rework possibilities for the one instrument which is waiting to be launched, and preferable lubrication considerations for specific space operational requirements similar to those for the ERBE scanner bearings.Document ID19860007082Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWatson, N. D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Miller, J. B.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Taylor, L. V.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Lovell, J. B.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Cox, J. W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Fedors, J. C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Kopia, L. P.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Holloway, R. M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Bradley, O. H.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1985Subject CategoryInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-87636NAS 1.15:87636Accession Number86N16552Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 619-12-01-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860007082.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 404.28 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions shall apply—

*Demand* —includes an order, subpoena, or other compulsory process issued by a party in litigation or a court of competent jurisdiction, requiring the production or release of Ex-Im Bank information or records, or requiring the testimony of Ex-Im Bank personnel.

*Ex-Im Bank personnel* —includes any current or former officer or employee of Ex-Im Bank, including all individuals who have been appointed by, or subject to, the official supervision, jurisdiction, or control of any Ex-Im Bank employees. This definition encompasses all individuals hired through contractual agreements with Ex-Im Bank, such as: consultants, contractors, sub-contractors, and their employees.

*Legal proceeding* —a case or controversy pending before any federal, state, or local court, including a grand jury proceeding; a proceeding before a federal, state, or local administrative judge, board, or other similar body with adjudicative powers; or a legislative proceeding before a state or local legislative body.

*Records* —all documentary materials that Ex-Im Bank creates or receives in connection with the transaction of official business, including any materials classified as “Federal records” under 44 U.S.C. 3301 and its implementing regulations.

*Testimony* —written or oral statements, including, but not limited to, depositions, answers to interrogatories, affidavits, declarations, and any other statements made in a legal proceeding, including any expert or opinion testimony.

[71 FR 14361, Mar. 22, 2006. Redesignated at 87 FR 41034, July 11, 2022]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alliance Financial Corporation (Alliance) for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Daniel Mohr, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Alliance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Alliance.

Dated: August 6, 2010



/s/ J. Daniel MohrJ. Daniel MohrExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
H. R. 3161

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To ratify the authority of the Federal Trade Commission to establish a do-notcall registry.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL DO-NOT-CALL REGISTRY.

(a) AUTHORITY.—The Federal Trade Commission is authorized

under section 3(a)(3)(A) of the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud

and Abuse Prevention Act (15 U.S.C. 6102(a)(3)(A)) to implement

and enforce a national do-not-call registry.

(b) RATIFICATION.—The do-not-call registry provision of the

Telemarketing Sales Rule (16 C.F.R. 310.4(b)(1)(iii)), which was

promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission, effective March

31, 2003, is ratified.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 246.1 Authority, purpose and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* This part (Regulation TT) is issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) under section 318 of Title III of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) (Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376, 1423-32, 12 U.S.C. 5365 and 5366), section 401 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA) (Pub. L. 115-174, 132 Stat. 1296), and section 11(s) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 248(s)).
( b ) *Scope.* This part applies to: ( 1 ) Any bank holding company having total consolidated assets of $100 billion or more, as defined in this section;
( 2 ) Any savings and loan holding company having total consolidated assets of $100 billion or more, as defined below; and
( 3 ) Any nonbank financial company supervised by the Board, as defined § 246.2.
( c ) *Purpose.* This part implements provisions of section 318 of the Dodd-Frank Act and section 401 of EGRRCPA that direct the Board to collect assessments, fees, or other charges from companies identified in subsection (b) that are equal to the total expenses the Board estimates are necessary or appropriate to carry out the supervisory and regulatory responsibilities of the Board with respect to these assessed companies and to adjust the amount charged to assessed companies with total consolidated assets between $100 billion and $250 billion to reflect any changes in supervisory and regulatory responsibilities resulting from EGRRCPA.
( d ) ( 1 ) *Reservation of authority.* In exceptional circumstances, for the purpose of avoiding inequitable or inconsistent application of the rule, the Board may require an assessed company to pay a lesser amount of assessments than would otherwise be provided for under this part.
( 2 ) *Use of comparable financial information.* The Board may use, at its discretion, any comparable financial information that the Board may require from a company in considering whether the company must pay to the Board an assessment and the amount of such assessment, pursuant to section 318 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
[78 FR 52492, Aug. 23, 2013, as amended at 85 FR 78953, Dec. 8, 2020]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epolin,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  the undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: October 14, 2009                 By:   /s/ Greg Amato
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Greg Amato,
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: October 14, 2009                 By:   /s/ James Ivchenko
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              James Ivchenko,
                                              President
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)