alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



List of Significant Subsidiaries: Percentage ofName
    
    ownership

    
    Registered office
    
    ActivityItalsofa Bahia Ltda
    
    
    97.99
    
    
    Bahia, Brazil
    
    (1)Italsofa (Shanghai) Co., Ltd
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Shanghai, China
    
    (1)SC Italsofa Romania S.r.l.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Baia Mare, Romania
    
    (1)Minuano Nordeste S.A.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Pojuca, Brazil
    
    (1)Softaly Shanghai, Ltd
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Shanghai, China
    
    (1)Natco S.p.A.
    
    
    99.99
    
    
    Bari, Italy
    
    (2)I.M.P.E. S.p.A.
    
    
    90.83
    
    
    Qualiano, Italy
    
    (3)Divani Due S.r.l.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Verona, Italy
    
    (4)Natuzzi Americas, Inc.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    High Point, NC, U.S.A.
    
    (4)Natuzzi Ibérica S.A.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Madrid, Spain
    
    (4)Natuzzi (Switzerland) AG
    
    
    97.00
    
    
    Dietikon, Switzerland
    
    (4)Natuzzi Nordic ApS
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    
    (4)Natuzzi Benelux NV
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Geel, Belgium
    
    (4)Natuzzi Germany GmbH
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Düsseldorf, Germany
    
    (4)Kingdom of Leather Limited
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    London, U.K.
    
    (4)La Galleria, Ltd
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    London, U.K.
    
    (4)Nacon S.p.A.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Bari, Italy
    
    (5)Italholding S.r.l.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Bari, Italy
    
    (5)Natuzzi Netherlands Holding B.V.
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Amsterdam, Holland
    
    (5)Natuzzi United Kingdom, Limited
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    London, U.K.
    
    (5)Natuzzi Trade Service S.r.l
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Bari, Italy
    
    (6)Kingdom of Leather Trustees Limited
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    London, U.K.
    
    (7)Natuzzi Asia, Ltd
    
    
    100.00
    
    
    Hong Kong, China
    
    (7)
 
 (1)
    
    Manufacture and distribution(2)
    
    Intragroup leather dyeing and finishing(3)
    
    Production and distribution of polyurethane foam(4)
    
    Distribution(5)
    
    Investment holding(6)
    
    Transportation Services(7)
    
    Non-operative
Fw:DraftF-GHGMRRforOMBClearance;ComparisonBetweenVersionsSUbmittedtoOMBinAugustandToday.SuzanneKocchito:ChristineKymn10/26/201005:22PMCc:"DeborahOttinger","KirstenCappel","PaulBalserak".•_--HiChristine-Hereareourcleanandtrackchangeversionsofthefgasfinalrule.PleaseletusknowifyouhaveanyquestionsandwhenyouarereadyforustouploadtoROCIS.Thanks-SuzieDeborahOttinger-----OriginalMessage-----From:DeborahOttingerSent:10/26/2010PMEDTTo:SuzanneKocchiCc:KirstenCappelSubject:DraftF-GHGMRRforOMBClearance;ComparisonBetweenVersionsSubmittedtoOMBinAugustandTodaySuzie,Attachedpleasefind(1)thedraftfinalF-GHGMRRforOMSclearanceand(2)a"trackchanges"versionoftherulethatcomparestoday'sversiontothatsubmittedtoOMSonAugust10.Pleasegivemeacallifyouhaveanyquestions.Thanks.DebbieComparisonF-GHGbetweenAugustMRR10andOctober2610submissions.docclean.docDeborahOttingerSchaeferInventoryAnalystforHigh-GWPEmissionsClimateChangeDivisionU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencye-mail:ottinger.deborah@epa.govphone:202-343-9149
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         THIS AMENDMENT, dated and effective as of the 28th day of November,
2001, to the Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") dated March 1,
2000, by and among Unilab Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("The Company")
and David W. Gee ("Executive"), is entered into for good and valid
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by
the parties hereto.

         WHEREAS, The parties desire to modify the terms of Executive's
employment with The Company; and

         WHEREAS, The Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment
Agreement to reflect the terms under which Executive will be employed henceforth
by The Company;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual
covenants set forth herein, the parties hereto agree that the Employment
Agreement shall be amended as follows:

          1.   TERM. The term set forth in Section 1 of the Employment Agreement
               is hereby  amended and extended to continue  until March 1, 2004,
               unless sooner  terminated in accordance  with Sections 5 and 6 of
               the Employment Agreement.  There shall be no further extension of
               the  Employment   Agreement  other  than  by  written  instrument
               executed by both parties hereto.

          2.   ENTIRE AGREEMENT.  This Amendment amends and supercedes Section 1
               of the Employment Agreement, as set forth herein, and constitutes
               the entire understanding  between the parties with respect to the
               subject  matter  hereof,  superseding  all  negotiations,   prior
               discussions,  and preliminary agreements, and in the event of any
               conflict  between this Amendment and the Employment  Agreement as
               to the subject  matter  hereof,  the terms hereof shall  control.
               Neither  this  Amendment  nor  the  Employment  Agreement  may be
               amended except in a writing executed by the parties hereto.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered the
Amendment as of the date first above written.

  UNILAB CORPORATION                             EXECUTIVE

  By:    /s/ Robert E. Whalen                     /s/ David W. Gee
        ------------------------------           ------------------------------
        Robert E. Whalen                         David W. Gee
        Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 11



                         Continental Homes Holding Corp.
                        Computation of Earnings Per Share
                      (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three months ended        Nine months ended
                                                             February 28,              February 28,
                                                             ------------              ------------
Diluted earnings per share:                               1998         1997         1998         1997
                                                          ----         ----         ----         ----
<S>                                                     <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>    
Net income                                              $ 7,400      $ 6,758      $22,655      $23,786
Interest expense on convertible
  subordinated notes, net of
  income taxes                                              874          875        2,623        2,624
                                                        -------      -------      -------      -------
                                                        $ 8,274      $ 7,633      $25,278      $26,410
                                                        =======      =======      =======      =======

Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding                                      6,866        6,897        6,860        6,960
Conversion of convertible
  subordinated notes (42.105 shares
  per $1,000 principal amount of notes)                   3,627        3,632        3,630        3,632
Incremental shares relating to stock
  options exercisable                                       177           64          131           56
                                                        -------      -------      -------      -------
Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding assuming full dilution                     10,670       10,593       10,621       10,648
                                                        =======      =======      =======      =======

Diluted earnings per share                              $   .78      $   .72      $  2.38      $  2.48
                                                        =======      =======      =======      =======
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             255
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                       474
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,456
<PP&E>                                         112,806
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,951
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,871
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,573)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,224
<SALES>                                         35,265
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,137
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,097
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (48,570)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,346)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (46,224)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (46,224)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.61)
        

</TABLE>
§ 217.155 Equity derivative contracts. ( a ) Under the IMA, in addition to holding risk-based capital against an equity derivative contract under this part, a Board-regulated institution must hold risk-based capital against the counterparty credit risk in the equity derivative contract by also treating the equity derivative contract as a wholesale exposure and computing a supplemental risk-weighted asset amount for the contract under § 217.132.
( b ) Under the SRWA, a Board-regulated institution may choose not to hold risk-based capital against the counterparty credit risk of equity derivative contracts, as long as it does so for all such contracts. Where the equity derivative contracts are subject to a qualified master netting agreement, a Board-regulated institution using the SRWA must either include all or exclude all of the contracts from any measure used to determine counterparty credit risk exposure.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

The undersigned, Clark R. Doyal, chief executive officer and chief accounting officer of ADS Media Group, Inc., a Utah corporation (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certifies that:

 

(1) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: | March 28, 2008 |
|-------|----------------|

|   |                                             | * *                                |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| By:    |          | */s/ Clark R. Doyal***                  |
|   |          | Clark R. Doyal, Chief Executive Officer |
§ 611.210 Director qualifications and training. ( a ) *Qualifications.* ( 1 ) Each bank and association board of directors must establish and maintain a policy identifying desirable director qualifications. The policy must explain the type and level of knowledge and experience desired for board members, explaining how the desired qualifications were identified. The policy must be periodically updated and provided to the institution's nominating committee.
( 2 ) Each Farm Credit institution board must have a director who is a financial expert. Boards of directors for associations with $500 million or less in total assets as of January 1 of each year may satisfy this requirement by retaining an advisor who is a financial expert. The financial advisor must report to the board of directors and be free of any affiliation with the external auditor or institution management. A financial expert is one recognized as having education or experience in: Accounting, internal accounting controls, or preparing or reviewing financial statements for financial institutions or large corporations consistent with the breadth and complexity of accounting and financial reporting issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the institution's financial statements.
( b ) *Training.* Each bank and association board of directors must establish and maintain a policy for director training that includes appropriate implementing procedures. The policy must identify training areas supporting desired director qualifications. Each Farm Credit bank and association must require newly elected or appointed directors to complete director orientation training within 1 year of assuming their position and require incumbent directors to attend training periodically to advance their skills.
#### § 404.37 Procedures for requests for Ex-Im Bank employees to provide expert or opinion testimony.

No Ex-Im Bank personnel may, unless specifically authorized by the General Counsel, testify in any legal proceeding as an expert or opinion witness as to any matter related to his or her duties or the functions of the Ex-Im Bank, including the meaning of Ex-Im Bank documents. Any demand for expert or opinion testimony shall comply with the policies and procedures outlined in this subpart.

[71 FR 14361, Mar. 22, 2006. Redesignated at 87 FR 41034, July 11, 2022]
§ 4.31 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purposes of this subpart are to: ( 1 ) Afford an orderly mechanism for the OCC to process expeditiously requests for non-public OCC information; to address the release of non-public OCC information without a request; and, when appropriate, for the OCC to assert evidentiary privileges in litigation;
( 2 ) Recognize the public's interest in obtaining access to relevant and necessary information and the countervailing public interest of maintaining the effectiveness of the OCC supervisory process and appropriate confidentiality of OCC supervisory information;
( 3 ) Ensure that the OCC's information is used in a manner that supports the public interest and the interests of the OCC;
( 4 ) Ensure that OCC resources are used in the most efficient manner consistent with the OCC's statutory mission;
( 5 ) Minimize burden on national banks, Federal savings associations, the public, and the OCC;
( 6 ) Limit the expenditure of government resources for private purposes; and
( 7 ) Maintain the OCC's impartiality among private litigants.
( b ) *Scope.* ( 1 ) This subpart applies to requests for, and dissemination of, non-public OCC information, including requests for records or testimony arising out of civil lawsuits and administrative proceedings to which the OCC is not a party and the release of non-public OCC information without a specific request. Lawsuits and administrative proceedings to which the OCC is not a party include proceedings in which a Federal agency is a party in opposition to the private requester.
( 2 ) This subpart does not apply to: ( i ) A request for a record or testimony in a proceeding in which the OCC is a party; or
( ii ) A request for a record that is required to be disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), as described in § 4.12.
( 3 ) A request for a record or testimony made by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a government agency of the United States or a foreign government, a state agency with authority to investigate violations of criminal law, or a state bank or state savings association regulatory agency is governed solely by § 4.37(c).
( 4 ) For purposes of §§ 4.35(a)(1), 4.36(a) and 4.37(c) of this part, the OCC's decision to disclose records or testimony involving a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) filed pursuant to the regulations implementing 12 U.S.C. 5318(g), or any information that would reveal the existence of a SAR, is governed by 12 CFR 21.11(k).
( 5 ) This subpart does not apply to requests for non-public information filed with the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) before July 21, 2011. These requests are subject to the rules of the OTS in effect on July 20, 2011.
[60 FR 57322, Nov. 15, 1995, as amended at 63 FR 62929, Nov. 10, 1998; 64 FR 29216, June 1, 1999; 75 FR 75576, Dec. 3, 2010; 76 FR 43562, July 21, 2011]
#### Cammack *v.*Lavender.

*Detinue.*

(Decided November 27, 1913.

63 South. 686.)

*Detinue; Right of Action; Prior Possession.*— Where a defendant’s subsequent possession is unconnected with the true ownership, a plaintiff’s prior possession of personal property entitled him to recover it in detinue although he be not the owner.

Appeal from Clarke Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. John T. Lackland.

Detinue by Leo. Cammack against T. J. Lavender for cow and calf. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

The charge referred to is as follows: “The court charges you that the burden is on plaintiff to convince you to your reasonable satisfaction that the cow belongs to plaintiff, and that, unless you are so'convinced by the evidence, then you must find for defendant.”

*444T. J. Bedsolb, for appellant.

The court erred in giving the charge requested by *defendant.*— Foster *v. Chamberlain,*41 Ala. 158; 3.5 Ala. .355. Counsel discusses other errors assigned, hut. without citation of authority. • .

Wilson & Tucker, for appellee. No ..brief reached the Reporter. . .

WALKER, P. J. —

We are unable to escape the conclusion that the court was in error in giving the charge In writing requested by the defendant. There was evidence tending to prove that the plaintiff was in possession of the personal property sued for before it came into the possession of the defendant, and that the defendant did not connect himself with the title to or the ownership of that property. A plaintiff’s prior possession of the personal property sued for entitles him to recover it in detinue if a subsequent possession of it shown by the defendant is unconnected with the true ownership of *it.*— Hardison *v. Plummer*152 Ala. 619, 44 South. 591; *Blair v. Williams,*159 Ala. 655, 49 South. 71. Under the charge mentioned the plaintiff’s right to recover was conditioned upon his sustaining the burden of proving to the reasonable satisfaction of the jury that the property sued for belonged to him — in other words, that he had title to or was the owner of it. Under one aspect of the evidence he was entitled to recover though the evidence in his favor did not go so far.

• Other questions presented need not be considered, as they are such that they may readily be avoided in another trial.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3385 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3385

  To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prevent sex offenders 
subject to involuntary civil commitments from receiving Federal student 
                             financial aid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 29, 2003

Mr. Keller (for himself, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Putnam, Mr. Wilson 
  of South Carolina, and Mr. Crenshaw) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prevent sex offenders 
subject to involuntary civil commitments from receiving Federal student 
                             financial aid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Financial Aid for Sex Offenders 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AID.

    (a) Pell Grants.--Section 401(b)(8) of the Higher Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a(b)(8)) is amended by inserting before the period 
the following: ``or who is subject to an involuntary civil commitment 
upon completion of a period of incarceration for a sexual offense (as 
determined under regulations of the Secretary)''.
    (b) Loans.--Section 484(b)(5) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1091(b)(5)) is 
amended by inserting before the period the following: ``and no student 
who is subject to an involuntary civil commitment upon completion of a 
period of incarceration for a sexual offense (as determined under 
regulations of the Secretary) is eligible to receive a loan under this 
title''.
                                 <all>
```
## **EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-75811) pertaining to the 1997 StockOption Plan of Thomas Group, Inc. and 1988 Amended and Restated 1992 StockOption Plan of Thomas Group, Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2007, withrespect to the consolidated financial statement of Thomas Group, Inc. includedin the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
| /s/            | Hein & Associates  LLP |   |
|----------------|----------------------------|--------|
|           | Hein & Associates  LLP |   |
|           |
| Dallas, Texas  |
| March 30, 2007 |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Casino Resource Corporation
Biloxi, Mississippi

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Company's previously
filed Registration Statements (file no. 33-31534) of our report dated 
November 5, 1996 except for Note 14 as to which the date is December 26, 1996,
and Note 6 as to which the date is May 19, 1997, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Casino Resource Corporation appearing in the Company's 
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 1996.


   
Chicago, Illinois                                               BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
June 9, 1997