alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State of Indiana *v.*Paris.

[No. 22,250 and 22,253 to 22,260.

Filed May 29, 1913.]

From Floyd Circuit Court; *Harry C. Montgomery,*Special Judge.

Prosecutions by the State of Indiana against John M. Paris. From a judgment in each case quashing the indictment, these appeals are prosecuted.

*Reversed.*

*Thomas M. Honan,*Attorney-General, *Walter V. Bulleit*and *George H. Hester,*for the State.

*Stotsenberg & Weathers*and *Charles D. Kelso,*for appellee.

Erwin, J.

The State of Indiana prosecutes the appellee in the above numbered causes from the Floyd Circuit Court. From a judgment quashing the indictment in said causes the State appeals to this court.

The questions involved are the same in each case as those presented in the ease of *State*v. *Paris*(1913), *ante*446, 101 N. E. 497, and upon that authority the judgment is reversed in each case with order to the court below to overrule appellee’s motion to quash the indictment.
# C_2018016EN.01000401.xml

| 18.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 13 September 2017

in Case E-15/16

Yara International ASA v The Norwegian Government

(Freedom of establishment — Articles 31 and 34 EEA — Necessity — National rules on intra-group contributions — Balanced allocation of taxation powers — Final loss exception — Risk of tax avoidance — Wholly artificial arrangement — Prohibition of abuse of rights)

(Freedom of establishment — Articles 31 and 34 EEA — Necessity — National rules on intra-group contributions — Balanced allocation of taxation powers — Final loss exception — Risk of tax avoidance — Wholly artificial arrangement — Prohibition of abuse of rights)

(2018/C 16/04)

In Case E-15/16, Yara International ASA v The Norwegian Government — REQUEST to the Court pursuant to Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by Borgarting Court of Appeal (Borgarting lagmannsrett) concerning the interpretation of Article 31 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area in the context of national rules on intra-group contributions, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Per Christiansen, and Ása Ólafsdóttir (ad hoc), Judges, gave judgment on 13 September 2017, the operative part of which is as follows:

Borgarting lagmannsrett

Articles 31 and 34 EEA do not preclude the application of national rules on intra-group contributions, such as the rules in the Norwegian Taxation Act, under which the contribution reduces the transferor’s taxable income and is included in the recipient’s taxable income regardless of whether the recipient makes a loss or a profit for tax purposes, that lay down the condition that both the transferor and the recipient are liable to taxation in the EEA State in question. It is a condition of EEA law that the national rules must serve a legitimate objective such as the need to safeguard the balanced allocation of taxation powers between EEA States or to prevent wholly artificial arrangements leading to tax avoidance. However, the requirements of national law go beyond what is necessary to pursue those objectives in cases where the loss sustained by the foreign subsidiary is final.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EPOLIN,
INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MAY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                          991,878
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   172,931
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     306,615
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,675,981
<PP&E>                          1,095,588
<DEPRECIATION>                  636,098
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,198,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           152,801
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        2,220,384
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,198,029
<SALES>                         491,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                491,666
<CGS>                           111,821
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   111,821
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                111,584
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 276,142
<INCOME-TAX>                    93,940
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             182,202
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    182,202
<EPS-BASIC>                   .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .02




</TABLE>
§ 1805.301 Eligible activities. Recipients may use financial assistance provided under this part to serve Investment Area(s) or Targeted Population(s) by developing or supporting, through lending, investing, enhancing liquidity, or other means of finance: ( a ) Commercial facilities that promote revitalization, community stability or job creation or retention;
( b ) Businesses that: ( 1 ) Provide jobs for Low-Income persons;
( 2 ) Are owned by Low-Income persons; or
( 3 ) Increase the availability of products and services to Low-Income persons;
( c ) Community Facilities;
( d ) The provision of Financial Services;
( e ) Housing that is principally affordable to Low-Income persons, except that assistance used to facilitate homeownership shall only be used for services and lending products that serve Low-Income persons and that: ( 1 ) Are not provided by other lenders in the area; or
( 2 ) Complement the services and lending products provided by other lenders that serve the Investment Area(s) or Targeted Population(s);
( f ) The provision of consumer loans (a loan to one or more individuals for household, family, or other personal expenditures); or
( g ) Other businesses or activities as requested by the Applicant and deemed appropriate by the CDFI Fund.
AFS-16-9305-E Attachment 1

The relief provided by Exemption No. 5487 is limited to the air carriers listed below: 1

Airlines for America Alaska Airlines, Inc. American Airlines, Inc. and/or US Airways, Inc. Atlas Air, Inc. Federal Express Corporation Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. JetBlue Airways Corp.

Southwest Airlines Co. United Airlines, Inc

United Parcel Service Co. Air Canada (Associate Member)

Additional Air Carriers 2

ABX AIR, Inc. Allegiant Air, LLC Ameristar Air Cargo, Inc. Delta Air Lines, Inc. Gulf and Caribbean Cargo, Inc. Miami Air International, Inc. MN Sun Country Omni Air International, Inc. Spirit Airlines, Inc. Tantonduk Outfitters, LTD

1 Attachment amended February 13, 2017.

2 Additional air carriers petitioned for exemption through the following FAA Docket Numbers: ABX AIR, Inc. (FAA-2017-0065); Allegiant Air, LLC (FAA-2016-7051); Ameristar Air Cargo, Inc. (FAA-2016-9162); Delta Air Lines, Inc. (FAA-2016-3659); Gulf and Caribbean Ca rgo, Inc. (FAA-2016-9368); Miami Air International, Inc. (FAA-2016-7050); MN Sun Country (FAA-2016-8935); Omni Air International, Inc. (FAA-2016-4705); Spirit Airlines, Inc. (FAA-2016-7056); Tantonduk Outfitters, LTD (FAA-2016-9106).
# C_2022379EN.01000601.xml

| 3.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

30 September 2022

(2022/C 379/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 0,9748 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,01 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4365 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88300 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8993 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9561 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 140,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,5838 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,549 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 422,18 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,8483 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9490 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,0841 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5076 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3401 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,6521 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7177 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4001 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 400,69 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,5353 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9368 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5240 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 863,26 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5201 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,276 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,823 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2584 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,6393 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,4250 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

0,9748

JPY

Japanese yen

141,01

DKK

Danish krone

7,4365

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88300

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8993

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9561

ISK

Iceland króna

140,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,5838

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,549

HUF

Hungarian forint

422,18

PLN

Polish zloty

4,8483

RON

Romanian leu

4,9490

TRY

Turkish lira

18,0841

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5076

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3401

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,6521

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7177

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4001

KRW

South Korean won

1 400,69

ZAR

South African rand

17,5353

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9368

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5240

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 863,26

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5201

PHP

Philippine peso

57,276

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,823

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2584

MXN

Mexican peso

19,6393

INR

Indian rupee

79,4250

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
RHODE I SLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2 35 Pro menade Str ee t, Pro vi de n ce , RI 029 0 8-5767 TDD 401-222

-4462

25 May 2016

Mr. David B. Conroy USEPA, Region 1 5 Post Office Square

- Suite 100 Boston, MA 02109-3912 Dear Mr. Conroy: The Office ofAir Resources is hereby submitting the following, revised Air Pollution Control Regulations as a revision to the Rhode Island State Implementation Plan (SIP). Each of these regulations is to replace the version previously submitted on 22 September 2008.

• Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 1 "Visible Emissions " • Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 3 "Particulate Emissions from Industrial Processes" • Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 4 " Open Fires " • Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 6 "Continuous Emi ssions Monitors " • Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 7 "Emission ofAir Contaminants Detrimental to Person or Property" • Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 12 " Incinerators " • Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 14 " Record Keeping and Reporting " • Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 15 " Control ofOrganic Solvent Emissions" • Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 19 " Control of Volatile Organic Compound s from Surface Coating Operations " • Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 21 "C ontrol of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Printing Operations " • Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 26 "Control of Organic Solvent Emissions from Manufacturers of Synthe si ze d Pharmaceutical Product s " • Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 27 "Control ofNitroge n Oxide Emissions" • Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 30 "Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Automobile Refinishing Operations" • Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 32 " Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Marine Vessel Loading Operations " • Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 35 "Control ofVolatile Organic Compounds and Volatile Hazardous Air Pollutants from Wood Product Manufacturing Operations" A 

## \.4' 30% post
-consumer fiberEach ofthese replacement regulations has certain provisions that have been stricken from the regulation and will not be part of the SIP revision. The version of each of these Air Pollution Control Regulations previously submitted on 22 September 2008 should be withdrawn. If you should have any questions, feel free to contact me at 401-222-2808 , ext 7011. Sincerely,

# ~~1!11 Office ofAir Resources Enclosure
cc: Susan Lancey, EPA w/o enclosures Ida McDonnell , EPA w/o enclosures
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Steven C. Mayer, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of
Human Genome Sciences, Inc. (the Registrant), certify, to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2002 of the Registrant (the Report), that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



| | /s/ Steven C. Mayer                        | 
| | ------------------------------------------ | 
| |                                           
| | Name: Steven C. Mayer
Date: March 26, 2003 |
#### Ralph H. HARTSELL, a/k/a DAVIS *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 73-34

495 S.W. 2d 523

Opinion delivered June 11, 1973

/. *E. Sanders,*for appellant.

*688
      *Jim Guy Tucker*Atty. Gen by: *James W. Atkins,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant through court appointed counsel asserts that the court’s order denying his pro se Rule 1 motion to vacate his judgment and sentence is erroneous. The court was correct in denying, pursuant to subparagraph (C) of the Rule, an evidentiary hearing.

In his motion he alleged that his request for counsel was denied and he was not represented by counsel when he entered a guilty plea to grand larceny in 1943 and, also, that the resulting one year sentence enhanced his present federal sentence. It is true that the court records do not reflect appellant was represented by counsel. Even so, as the state contends, our Rule provides post conviction relief only for “[A] prisoner, in custody under sentence of a *circuit*court. . .” (Emphasis added). Criminal Procedure Rule 1A, Ark. Stat. Ann., Vol. 3A, Suppl. 1971, p. 107. It is not designed for and we decline to enlarge the scope of it to include a prisoner under sentence of a *federal*court. Certainly, appellant was and is not precluded from seeking the asserted post conviction relief, for which the federal rules provide, in the appropriate federal forum.

Affirmed.

Harris, C.J., concurs.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to my knowledge, the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), for the quarter ended March 31, 2004:

         1. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:     May 17, 2004        By:        /s/ Kenneth Ruotolo
          ------------                 -----------------------------------------
                                       Kenneth Ruotolo
                                       Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be
retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                       Certification of ANTs software inc.
           pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002
          regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 1)
                      for the quarter ended March 31, 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of ANTs software inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

     1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended
March 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-QSB/A") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. Information contained in the Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 14, 2002                 By: /s/ Francis K. Ruotolo
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Francis K. Ruotolo, Chairman,
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President


Date: November 14, 2002                By: /s/ Kenneth Ruotolo
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Kenneth Ruotolo
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             BACK YARD BURGERS, INC.

I, Lattimore M. Michael, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K of Back Yard Burgers,
Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: April 1, 2004

/s/ Lattimore M. Michael
------------------------

Lattimore M. Michael
Chief Executive Officer
PRACTICE — ATTORNEY FEES.

[Lucas Circuit Court,

January Term, 1894.]

Bentley, Haynes and Scribner, JJ.

#### Joseph Kesting v. Lena Donahue et al.

A motion is presented to the court in this case for an order striking out certain allegations in the cross-petition of the Mutual Building and Loan Co., made for the purpose of enforcing the alleged contract of its mortgagor to.pay its attorney’s fee in this action (which is one to marshal liens of mechanics and others including that of the Loan Company, by way of mortgage on certain lands.)

*Held\*That the consideration of the questions presented by the motion more properly arise on the final hearing of the case, and, without prejudice to the right of parties to raise the question, then the motion is overruled.
EXHIBIT 6

EXCEL TABLE

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-6 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 6 - Excel Table - Customer Ledger Page 1 of 3
Case 17-03283-LTS9 Claim 1539-2 Part 2 Filed 06/25/18 Desc Exhibit A - Ledger EXHIBIT A

 and other docs. Page 1 of 4

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-6 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 6 - Excel Table - Customer Ledger Page 2 of 3
CERTIFIED TRANSLATION

I, Juan E. Segarra, USCCI #06-067/translator, certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate 

translation, to the best of my abilities, of the document in Spanish which I have seen.

Case 17-03283-LTS9 Claim 1539-2 Part 2 Filed 06/25/18 Desc Exhibit A - Ledger

and other docs. Page 1 of 4

[Translator’s note: Page in English, except for term translated below:]

Comisión de Servicio Públic = Public Service Commission 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22614-6 Filed:10/17/22 Entered:10/17/22 07:47:07 Desc:

Exhibit 6 - Excel Table - Customer Ledger Page 3 of 3