alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 625.3 Eligibility of applicants. ( a ) To be eligible for an award under the EAJA, an applicant must be a prevailing party named or admitted to the adversary adjudication for which an award is sought. The applicant must show that it meets all conditions of eligibility set out in this subpart and in subpart B of this part.
( b ) The types of eligible applicants are as follows: ( 1 ) An individual with a net worth of $2 million or less;
( 2 ) The sole owner of an unincorporated business who has both a net worth of $7 million or less (including personal and business interests), and 500 or fewer employees;
( 3 ) A charitable or other tax-exempt organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) with 500 or fewer employees;
( 4 ) A cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)) with 500 or fewer employees; and
( 5 ) Any other partnership, corporation, association, unit of local government, or organization with a net worth of $7 million or less and 500 or fewer employees.
( c ) For eligibility purposes, the net worth and number of employees of an applicant shall be determined as of the date the adversary adjudication was initiated.
( d ) An applicant who owns an unincorporated business will be considered as an “individual” rather than a “sole owner of an unincorporated business” if the issues on which the applicant prevails are related primarily to personal interests rather than to business interests.
( e ) The employees of an applicant include all persons who regularly perform services for remuneration for that applicant, under the applicant's direction and control. Part-time employees shall be included on a proportional basis.
( f ) The net worth and number of employees of the applicant and all of its affiliates shall be aggregated to determine eligibility unless the presiding officer determines that aggregation would be unjust and contrary to the purposes of the EAJA in light of the actual relationship between the affiliated entities. ( 1 ) For purposes of this part, an affiliate is: ( i ) Any individual, corporation, or other entity that directly or indirectly controls or owns a majority of the voting shares or other interests of the applicant; or
( ii ) Any corporation or other entity of which the applicant directly or indirectly owns or controls a majority of the voting shares or other interests.
( 2 ) The presiding officer may determine that financial relationships of the applicant other than those described in paragraph (f)(1) of this section constitute special circumstances that would make an award unjust.
( g ) An applicant that participates in an adversary adjudication primarily on behalf of one or more other persons or entities that would be ineligible is not itself eligible for an award.
# C_2021082EN.01001001.xml

| 11.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/10

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 82/09)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 3 December 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85929 |
| Decision No | 142/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 Amendment to the package travel grant scheme |
| Legal basis | The legal basis of the measure is the Parliamentary Decision authorising the measure, in accordance with the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries’ proposal |
| Type of measure | Grant scheme |
| Objective | The objective of the measure is to: (i) ensure that sufficient liquidity remains available for traders in the package travel market, in order to counter the damage inflicted on impacted undertakings; (ii) ensure the quickest possible settlement of refunds or reimbursements to package travellers; and (iii) preserve the continuity of economic activity during and after the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Budget | NOK 195 million |
| Duration | 26.6.2020 – 31.12.2020 |
| Economic sectors | Package travel |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Innovation Norway |
| Akersgata 13 |
| N-0104 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

3 December 2020

Case No

85929

Decision No

142/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 Amendment to the package travel grant scheme

Legal basis

The legal basis of the measure is the Parliamentary Decision authorising the measure, in accordance with the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries’ proposal

Type of measure

Grant scheme

Objective

The objective of the measure is to: (i) ensure that sufficient liquidity remains available for traders in the package travel market, in order to counter the damage inflicted on impacted undertakings; (ii) ensure the quickest possible settlement of refunds or reimbursements to package travellers; and (iii) preserve the continuity of economic activity during and after the COVID-19 outbreak

Budget

NOK 195 million

Duration

26.6.2020 – 31.12.2020

Economic sectors

Package travel

Name and address of the granting authority

Innovation Norway

Akersgata 13

N-0104 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
VOC Emission Rate

lb/hr tpy

EPFUG EPR Unit Fugitives 17.61 77.12

FLARE1 Waste Gas Flare 9.66 13.68

27NV M-Line Dryer Vent

1T23M M-Line Shaker Screen Vent

41C11M South Slurry Tank Vent

115N N-Line Dryer Vent

101N N-Line Rotary Screen Vent

104N N-Line Cyclone Vent

51C19N N-Line Slurry Surge Tank 

Vent

TK-2D-3C Catalyst Tank Vent 0.15 0.01

TK-2D-15D Catalyst Tank Vent 26.09 2.53

TK-2D-6E Catalyst Tank Vent 3.42 0.12

WCT-32 Cooling Tower 0.5 1.66

WWFUG Wastewater Fugitives 0.03 0.03

EPR UNIT: Permitted Emission Summary, Permit #19663

N Finishing 

Line N Line Vent

Indvidual Stack 

Number

18

EPN Name Individual Point Name

M Finishing 

Line M Line Vent

34.13

14.8 36.44
§ 354.5 Restrictions on industrial bank subsidiaries of Covered Companies. Without the FDIC's prior written approval, an industrial bank that is controlled by a Covered Company shall not: ( a ) Make a material change in its business plan after becoming a subsidiary of such Covered Company;
( b ) Add or replace a member of the board of directors, board of managers, or a managing member, as the case may be, of the subsidiary industrial bank during the first three years after becoming a subsidiary of such Covered Company;
( c ) Add or replace a senior executive officer during the first three years after becoming a subsidiary of such Covered Company;
( d ) Employ a senior executive officer who is, or during the past three years has been, associated in any manner (*e.g.,* as a director, officer, employee, agent, owner, partner, or consultant) with an affiliate of the industrial bank; or
( e ) Enter into any contract for services material to the operations of the industrial bank (for example, loan servicing function) with such Covered Company or any subsidiary thereof.
#### § 337.4 [Reserved]
#### § 404.15 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions shall apply:

*Appeal* —A written request to the Ex-Im Bank Assistant General Counsel for Administration for reversal of an adverse initial determination.

*Final determination* —The written decision by the Assistant General Counsel for Administration on an appeal.

*Individual* —A citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.

*Initial determination* —The initial written determination in response to a Privacy Act request.

*Record* —Any item, collection or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained within a system of records and that contains the individual's name or an identifying number, symbol or other identifying particular assigned to the individual.

*Redaction* —The process of removing non-disclosable material from a record so that the remainder may be released.

*Request for access* —A request to view a record.

*Request for accounting* —A request for a list of all disclosures of a record.

*Request for correction* —A request to modify a record.

*Requester* —An individual who makes a request under the Privacy Act.

*Review* —The process of examining a record to determine whether any portion is required to be withheld.

*Search* —The process of identifying and collecting records pursuant to a request.

*System of records* —A group of any records under the control of an agency from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or some identifying number, symbol or other identifying particular assigned to the individual.

*Working days* —All calendar days excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal Government holidays.

[64 FR 14374, Mar. 25, 1999. Redesignated at 87 FR 41034, July 11, 2022]
#### § 382.6 [Reserved]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3366

To designate the building located at 493 Auburn Avenue, N.E., in Atlanta, 

Georgia, as the ‘‘John Lewis Civil Rights Institute’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 21, 2003

Mr. SCOTT of Georgia (for himself and Ms. MAJETTE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To designate the building located at 493 Auburn Avenue, 

N.E., in Atlanta, Georgia, as the ‘‘John Lewis Civil 

Rights Institute’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. JOHN LEWIS CIVIL RIGHTS INSTITUTE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The building located at 493 Au5 burn Avenue, N.E., in Atlanta, Georgia, shall be known 

6 and designated as the ‘‘John Lewis Civil Rights Insti7 tute’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the building referred to in subsection (a) shall 
2

•HR 3366 IH 

1 be deemed to be a reference to the John Lewis Civil Rights 

2 Institute.

Æ
§ 611.1137 Title VIII service corporations. ( a ) *What is a title VIII service corporation?* A title VIII service corporation is a service corporation organized for the purpose of exercising the authorities granted under title VIII of the Act to act as an agricultural mortgage marketing facility.
( b ) *How do I form a title VIII service corporation?* A title VIII service corporation is formed and subject to the same requirements as a service corporation formed under § 611.1135, with one exception. The Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation or its affiliates may not form or own stock in a title VIII service corporation.
§ 608.806 Demand for payment. ( a ) A total of three progressively stronger written demands at not more than 30-day intervals should normally be made upon a debtor, unless a response or other information indicates that additional written demands would either be unnecessary or futile. When necessary to protect the Government's interest, written demands may be preceded by other appropriate actions under Federal law, including immediate referral for litigation and/or administrative offset.
( b ) The initial demand for payment shall be in writing and shall inform the debtor of the following: ( 1 ) The amount of the debt, the date it was incurred, and the facts upon which the determination of indebtedness was made;
( 2 ) The payment due date, which shall be 30 calendar days from the date of mailing or hand delivery of the initial demand for payment;
( 3 ) The right of the debtor to inspect and copy the records of the agency related to the claim or to receive copies if personal inspection is impractical. The debtor shall be informed that the debtor may be assessed for the cost of copying the documents in accordance with § 608.807;
( 4 ) The right of the debtor to obtain a review of the FCA's determination of indebtedness;
( 5 ) The right of the debtor to offer to enter into a written agreement with the agency to repay the amount of the claim. The debtor shall be informed that the acceptance of such an agreement is discretionary with the agency;
( 6 ) That charges for interest, penalties, and administrative costs will be assessed against the debtor, in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3717, if payment is not received by the payment due date;
( 7 ) That if the debtor has not entered into an agreement with the FCA to pay the debt, has not requested the FCA to review the debt, or has not paid the debt by the payment due date, the FCA intends to collect the debt by all legally available means, which may include initiating legal action against the debtor, referring the debt to a collection agency for collection, collecting the debt by offset, or asking other Federal agencies for assistance in collecting the debt by offset;
( 8 ) The name and address of the FCA official to whom the debtor shall send all correspondence relating to the debt; and
( 9 ) Other information, as may be appropriate.
( c ) If, prior to, during, or after completion of the demand cycle, the FCA determines to collect the debt by either administrative or salary offset, the FCA shall follow, as applicable, the requirements for a Notice of Intent to Collect by Administrative Offset or a Notice of Intent to Collect by Salary Offset set forth in § 608.822.
( d ) If no response to the initial demand for payment is received by the payment due date, the FCA shall take further action under this part, under the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended, under the joint regulations (4 CFR parts 101-105), or under any other applicable State or Federal law. These actions may include reports to credit bureaus, referrals to collection agencies, termination of contracts, debarment, and salary or administrative offset.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Financial Data Statement for Adelphia Communications Corp. for the
9 months ended December 31, 1995
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          22,802
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,494<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         547,052<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,341,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,147,134
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           263
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,091,537)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,341,447
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               296,460
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  220,647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             159,159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (87,065)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,366)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (84,699)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (84,699)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.22)
<FN>
<F1>Receivables net of Allowance
<F2>PP&E net of Depreciation
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE AGREEMENT


     FOR  VALUE  RECEIVED,  Barbara  Sullivan Cameron ("Assignor"), for good and
valuable  consideration,  does hereby sell, assign, and transfer to Ornali Group
Inc.,  a  Washington  corporation  ("Assignee"),  all  of  the rights, title and
interest  of  Assignor  and  delegates to Assignee all of the duties of Assignor
under that certain License Agreement dated March 9, 2001 by and between Assignor
and  Vitamineralherb.com  Corp.,  a  Nevada Corporation, a true copy of which is
annexed  hereto  and  made  a  part  hereof.

     Assignor  represents  that  the  annexed  contract  is  a valid and binding
agreement in all respects, is assignable and the duties hereunder delegable, and
that  this  assignment  and  delegation  is  a  valid exercise of the Assignor's
rights.

     Assignee hereby assumes and agrees to perform all of Assignor's obligations
under the annexed  contract.  Assignee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless
Assignor,  from  and against any claim, liability and expense which Assignee may
incur (including without limitation attorneys fees and litigation expenses) that
arises  out  of Assignee's performance of, or failure to perform, such contract.


Dated  this  9th  day  of  March,  2001.


ASSIGNOR:                                   ASSIGNEE:

                                            Ornali  Group  Inc.


/s/                                                    /s/
----------------------------                 ----------------------------
Troy  Zapara                                 Barbara  Cameron
                                             President


<PAGE>
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1

 

		
 Commercial Note Renewal Letter



                                                 

 

10 Franklin Rd SE STE 100

Roanoke, VA 24011 

 

 

May 7, 2015

 

Tracy G. Smith, Senior VP and CFO 

Optical Cable Corporation

5290 Concourse Drive

Roanoke, VA 24019   

 

 

 

 

Subject: Renewal of Commercial Note and Extension of Maturity Date 

 

 

 

Dear Tracy:  

 

SunTrust Bank hereby agrees to renew your open-end revolving line of credit under Commercial Note Number 6899978-18/26/34 (the “Note”), dated August 30, 2013 made by Optical Cable Corporation (the “Borrower”). Upon our receipt of the original of this letter duly executed by you as provided below and payment of a renewal fee in the amount of $626.20, we hereby agree to extend the current maturity date of August 31, 2016 to August 31, 2017. If the Note is not renewed, the outstanding principal amount and all unpaid accrued interest will be due and payable on the current maturity date.

 

Other than the maturity date as changed above, all other terms and conditions of the Note and all other documents executed in connection with the Note remain unchanged unless otherwise agreed in a separate writing by SunTrust. Any collateral or guaranties which currently secure the Note will continue to secure the Note as renewed.

 

If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at 540-982-3120.

 Sincerely, 

 

 

 

/s/ Chad H. Brown

 Chad H. Brown 

 Senior Vice President

SunTrust Bank

 

 

 


 

 Page 1 of 2




 


 

 

 

 

 

Acknowledge your acceptance of the above terms by executing the original of this letter and returning it in the envelope provided and making payment of the renewal fee no later than May 8, 2015.

 

By accepting this extension of the Note, the Borrower represents and warrants to SunTrust that all representations and warranties made by the Borrower in the Note and any other documents executed in connection therewith are true and correct on the renewal date, May 7, 2015, and that no event of default exists on such renewal date.

 

Accepted and agreed this     7th                 day of       May                                     2015      . 

 

Optical Cable Corporation

 

  

By:      /s/ Tracy G. Smith                                                      

Tracy G. Smith, SVP and CFO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Page 2 of 2
#### Henry Miller, Appellant, *v.*John J. Sullivan et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, ninth district, borough of Manhattan.

Oahill, Geiseman *&*Phillips, for appellant.

Benjamin Baker, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

If the disputed facts respecting the first agreement between the parties were resolved in favor of the defendants, the plaintiff would, nevertheless, be entitled to recover on the evidence in this case. Plaintiff’s evidence relating to the making of the second agreement is amply supported by the evidence of disinterested witnesses, and as a contract under seal may be annulled by a substituted parol agreement followed by actual performance (McCreery v. Day, 119 N. Y. 1), the judgment should be affirmed.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerioh and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-235-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)