alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 329.2 Reservation of authority. ( a ) The FDIC may require an FDIC-supervised institution to hold an amount of high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) greater than otherwise required under this part, or to take any other measure to improve the FDIC-supervised institution's liquidity risk profile, if the FDIC determines that the FDIC-supervised institution's liquidity requirements as calculated under this part are not commensurate with the FDIC-supervised institution's liquidity risks. In making determinations under this section, the FDIC will apply notice and response procedures as set forth in 12 CFR 324.5.
( b ) The FDIC may require an FDIC-supervised institution to maintain an amount of available stable funding greater than otherwise required under this part, or to take any other measure to improve the FDIC-supervised institution's stable funding, if the FDIC determines that the FDIC-supervised institution's stable funding requirements as calculated under this part are not commensurate with the FDIC-supervised institution's funding risks. In making determinations under this section, the FDIC will apply notice and response procedures as set forth in 12 CFR 324.5.
( c ) Nothing in this part limits the authority of the FDIC under any other provision of law or regulation to take supervisory or enforcement action, including action to address unsafe or unsound practices or conditions, deficient liquidity levels, deficient stable funding levels, or violations of law.
[79 FR 61523, Oct. 10, 2014, as amended at 86 FR 9219, Feb. 11, 2021]
<PAGE>





                                                                     EXHBIT 12.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                                                                         Year Ended December 31,

                                                    2001            2000           1999             1998          1997
                                                    ----            ----           ----             ----          ----
<S>                                               <C>            <C>            <C>             <C>           <C>
Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense on
     indebtedness
     (including
     amortization of debt
     expense and discount)                        $  22,347      $  36,082      $  14,146      $     191      $     446

   Interest expense on
     portion of rent
     expense
     representative
     of interest                                      6,159          3,251          2,951          1,299          1,072

                                                  ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
  Total Fixed Charges                             $  28,506      $  39,333      $  17,097      $   1,490      $   1,518
                                                  =========      =========      =========      =========      =========


Earnings (Loss):
   Net loss before
      provision for income
      taxes and cumulative
      effect of change
      in accounting principle                     $(117,152)     $(235,331)     $ (41,944)     $ (22,957)     $ (21,148)
   Fixed charges per
      above                                          28,506         39,333         17,097          1,490          1,518
                                                  ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------

  Total Earnings (Loss)                           $ (88,646)     $(195,998)     $ (24,847)     $ (21,467)     $ (19,630)
                                                  =========      =========      =========      =========      =========

Ratio of Earnings to
   Fixed Charges                                         --             --             --             --             --

Coverage deficiency (1)(2)                        $(117,152)     $(235,331)     $ (41,944)     $ (22,957)     $ (21,148)
                                                  =========      =========      =========      =========      =========
</TABLE>

(1)     The Company's Coverage deficiency for 2001 includes non-recurring
        charges aggregating $26,208 arising from the Company's impairment charge
        relating to its investment in Transgene and debt conversion expenses of
        $22,314 and $3,894, respectively.
(2)     The Company's Coverage deficiency for 2000 includes non-recurring
        charges aggregating $184,868 arising from purchased in-process research
        and development and debt conversion expenses of $134,050 and $50,818,
        respectively.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 780(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: June 29, 2006
    /s/    THOMAS P. RAIMONDI, JR.Thomas P. RaimondiChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 69
#### § 1290.8 Compliance dates.

From December 28, 2018 to December 31, 2020, a Bank shall comply with either prior part 1290 (in 12 CFR part 1290 (January 1, 2018 edition)) or this part 1290. On and after January 1, 2021, a Bank shall comply with this part 1290.

[83 FR 61231, Nov. 28, 2018]
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 198 (Thursday, October 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52991-52992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24849]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

[(OMB Control No. 3206-0138; Form RI 30-9)]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request for Review of a 
Revised Information Collection

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

[[Page 52992]]

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) a request for review of a revised information 
collection. This information collection, ``Reinstatement of Disability 
Annuity Previously Terminated Because of Restoration to Earning 
Capacity'' (OMB Control No. 3206-0138; Form RI 30-9), informs former 
disability annuitants of their right to request restoration under title 
5, U.S.C. Sections 8337 and 8455. It also specifies the conditions to 
be met and the documentation required for a person to request 
reinstatement.
    We estimate 200 forms are completed annually. The form takes 
approximately 60 minutes to respond, including a medical examination. 
The annual estimated burden is 200 hours. Burden may vary depending on 
the time required for a medical examination.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Cyrus S. Benson on (202) 606-
4808, FAX (202) 606-0910 or via E-mail to [email protected]. Please 
include a mailing address with your request.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--

James K. Freiert, Deputy Assistant Director, Retirement Services 
Program, Center for Retirement and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of 
Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC 
20415-3500; and
OMB Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs, Office of 
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, NW., 725 17th 
Street, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

    For information regarding administrative coordination contact: 
Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RIS Support Services/
Support Group, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., 
Room 4H28, Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-0623.

Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
[FR Doc. E9-24849 Filed 10-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-P
```
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-30827

Summary Calendar

_____________________

MICHAEL W. KELLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA;

CAMCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(98-CV-1840)

_________________________________________________________________

May 2, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Concerning summary judgment being awarded Appellees in Michael

W. Kelley’s action arising out of his being denied long-term

disability benefits under Camco’s employee benefit plan, Kelley

contends that the district court erred in finding no conflict

between the offset provisions in his employer’s (Camco’s) Summary

Plan Description (SPD) and Prudential’s policy and expanding the

offset provisions contained in the SPD by including general damages

as other income. (Kelley had settled a third-party, personal

injury action. His retirement from Camco was linked to that.)
2

A summary judgment is reviewed de novo. E.g., Melton v.

Teachers Ins. & Annuity Ass’n of America, 114 F.3d 557, 559 (5th

Cir. 1997). Denial of ERISA benefits by a plan administrator

vested with the authority to make a final and conclusive

determination of claims is reviewed for abuse of discretion. 

E.g., Meditrust Financial Servs. Corp. v. Sterling Chemicals, Inc.,

168 F.3d 211, 213 (5th Cir. 1999). 

Based on our review of the record and briefs, there was no

direct conflict between the SPD and Prudential’s policy. See

Hansen v. Continental Ins. Co., 940 F.2d 971, 982 (5th Cir. 1991);

Wise v. El Paso Natural Gas Co., 986 F.2d 929, 938-39 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 510 U.S. 870 (1993). Accordingly, Prudential did not

abuse its discretion in denying benefits to Kelley. Therefore,

essentially for the reasons stated by the district court. Kelley

v. Prudential Ins. Co., et al., No. 6:98-1840 (W.D. La. 1999)

(unpublished), the judgment is

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24614]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 27, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521:
    1. Patriot Financial Partners, GP, L.P.; Patriot Financial 
Partners, L.P.; Patriot Financial Partners Parallel, L.P.; Patriot 
Financial Partners, GP, LLC; Patriot Financial Managers, L.P.; and 
Messrs. Ira M. Lubert; W. Kirk Wycoff; and James J. Lynch, all of 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; to acquire voting shares of Heritage Oakes 
Bancorp, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Heritage Bank, 
both in Paso Robles, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 7, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-24614 Filed 10-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 23 (Thursday, February 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6165-6166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2447]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Subcommittee on Procedures Reviews, Advisory Board on Radiation 
and Worker Health (ABRWH), National Institute for Occupational Safety 
and Health (NIOSH)

    Notice of Cancellation: This notice was published in the Federal 
Register on January 13, 2009, Volume 74, Number 8, pages 1689-1690. The 
meeting previously scheduled to convene on January 28, 2009, has been 
cancelled. The meeting was cancelled due to inclement weather and 
airport and facility inaccessibility. A notice will be published if the 
meeting is rescheduled.
    Contact Person for More Information: Theodore Katz, Executive 
Secretary, NIOSH, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop E-20, Atlanta, GA 
30333, Telephone (513) 533-6800, Toll Free 1(800) CDC-INFO, e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ae5e9ebf9cae9eee9a4ede5fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4cbc7c5d7e4c7c0c78ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC

[[Page 6166]]

and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: January 30, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-2447 Filed 2-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) I, H. Thomas Watkins, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of Human Genome
Sciences, Inc. (the Registrant), certify, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 of the Registrant (the Report),
that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ H.
Thomas Watkins
Name: H. Thomas Watkins
Date: March 15, 2005
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 10.8

                                 QUITCLAIM DEED

      THIS INDENTURE made the 18th day of August 2000.

BETWEEN BRANCOTE U.S. INC., the party of the first part, and HERB DUERR, the
party of the second part,

      WITNESSETH: that said party of the first part, does hereby release and
forever QUITCLAIM unto the party of the second part, and to his heirs and
assigns, all the Mining Claims located in the State of Nevada listed on Exhibit
"A" attached to this document.

      TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, together with the appurtenances,
unto the part of the second part, and to this heirs and assigns forever.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF the party of the first part has executed this
conveyance the day and year first above written.


                              By: /s/ John Prochnau
                                 John Prochnau, Agent for Brancote U.S. Inc.

State of Nevada   )
                  )
County of Washoe  )

      On this 18th day of August 2000, personally appeared before me, a
Notary Public JOHN PROCHNAU AGENT FOR BRANCOTE U.S. INC.,  personally known
to me that he executed the same for the purposes therein stated.

                                    /s/ Cynthia Ball
                                    Notary Public


<PAGE>


                                 EXHIBIT "A"

Mining claims located in the State of Nevada


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Claim Name                          BLM NMC Number                     County
----------                          --------------                     ------
<S>                                 <C>                                <C>
AS 111, 113                         709831, 709633                     Elko

Bell Flat 1, 3                      631962, 631964                     Churchill

Butch 23 - 30                       781564 - 781571                    Pershing
      42, 44                        781577, 781579

BT 71-76                            709637 - 709842                    Elko
   95, 97, 99                       708643, 709644, 709645

DD 38, 40                           608567, 608,569                    Eureka
   42 - 46                          608671 - 608575
   49 - 53, 47                      608678 - 608582, 731664

Dolly 21 -24                        709625 - 709627                    Elko

G 23, 24, 27                        631450, 631451, 631454             Mineral

GA 19                               631474                             Mineral

Gilman  31 - 31                     623866 - 623869                    Lander

Moongold 1, 3, 7                    625103, 625105, 625107             Washoe
         2, 4, 11                   730426, 730427, 730433

TC 36 - 40                          709646 - 709650                    White Pine
   41 - 43                          758619 - 758-621

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JAMSHID ASSADINIA,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 795 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 12.1CERTIFICATIONI, Eivind Reiten, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report amendment on Form 20-F/A of Norsk Hydro ASA for the yearended December 31, 2005;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report;4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the company and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based onsuch evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal controls over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: 27 April 2006       /s/ Eivind Reiten     Name:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZHUCHENG GAO ,

Petitioner,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 13

- 72021 Agency No. A089

- 968

- 749

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted March 15, 2016 **
Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and CHRISTEN , Circuit Judges. Zhucheng Gao , a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigrati on Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigrat ion judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36

- 3.

** The panel unani mously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 21 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 13

- 72021

withholding of removal , and denying his motion to remand . We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039

- 1040 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility finding based
on Gao’s admitted lies and omissions about his residence and employment , and
inconsistent account of his U.S. church attendan ce
. See Singh v. Holder , 643 F.3d 1178, 1181 (9th Cir. 2011) (“An asylum applicant who lies to immigration
authorities casts doubt on his credibili ty and the rest of his story.”) ; Shrestha , 590 F.3d at 1048 ( adverse credibility deter mination reasonable under the totality of the circumstances)

. We reject Gao’s contentions that the IJ engaged in improper conjecture or was biased. In the absence of credible testimony, Gao ’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. A shcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).
As to the motion to remand, Gao does not challenge the BIA’s dispositive finding that he failed to present evidence that was previously unavailable. See
Martinez

- Serrano v. INS , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259

- 60 (9th Cir. 1996) (“Issues raised in a brief that are not supported by argument are deemed abandoned.”).3 13

- 72021

The 6 0

- day stay of proceedings granted on December 1, 2015, has expired. Respondent's motion to lift the stay is denied as moot.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.