alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GEER *v.*DOZIER *et al.,*registrars.

No. 9245.

November 15, 1932.

*866
      *V. I. Geer*and *P. Z. Geer,*for plaintiff.

Gilbert, J.

*W.*I. Geer sought injunction to prevent the individuals composing the Board of Registrars of Miller County “from striking his name from the voters’ list, and from the registered list of voters of said county,” and general relief. His petition alleged that he had paid all taxes required of him since the adoption of the constitution of 1877; that he was properly registered and qualified in all particulars as a voter; that he had announced himself a candidate for the office of State Senator from the Eighth Senatorial District; that several times since April 21, 1932, and particularly on July 16, 1932, he had been served with notice to appear and show cause before the registrars why his name should not be stricken from the voters’ book “as a tax defaulter for the year 1931;” that he was advised and believed that the registrars would strike his name from the voters’ list and book, unless restrained by injunction; that their only purpose in doing so was to “disqualify him from voting, and to prevent his name from appearing upon the 'list of qualified voters of said county for the year 1932, and thus to prevent him from running for the State Senate;” that all of the notices to show cause before the registrars were wholly illegal, because not served in the manner and form prescribed by law, and because they did not specify the grounds of challenge.

The defendants demurred on the grounds that (1) the petition does not state a cause of action; (2) the allegations are insufficient to authorize the equitable relief prayed; (3) the allegations show that a court of equity would not be authorized to take cognizance of the matter; (4) if the registrars should unlawfully strike the name of the petitioner, he would have an adequate remedy at law; (5) he merely seeks by injunction to prevent the registrars from performing their official duty, without alleging any sufficient reason for interference with such duty. The exception is to a judgment sustaining these demurrers and dismissing the petition.

It was error to sustain the general demurrer. It has been held that injunction is a proper remedy. *Padrosa*v. *Amos,*175 *Ga.*413 (165 S. E. 248).

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Set: 10:00 AM (EST)

Started: 10:13 AM (EST)

Ended: 1:33 PM (EST)

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN DATE: January 10, 2018

COURTROOM DEPUTY: Lisa Ng

COURT REPORTER: Lisa Ferris and Kelly Surina (SDNY)

Unión de Trabajadores de la Industria Eléctrica 

y Riego (UTIER) 3:17-AP-228 (LTS)

Plaintiff, in 17-BK-4780 (LTS)

v.

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA),

et al.

Defendants.

Motion hearing held re: 17 BK 3283 (LTS)/ 17-AP-228 (LTS).

Arguments heard in connection with the (i) Objection and Motion of Aurelius to Dismiss Title 

III Petition (Docket Entry No. 913, the “Motion to Dismiss”), (ii) the Motion of Aurelius for Relief 

from the Automatic Stay (Docket Entry No. 914, the “Stay Relief Motion” and, together with the 

Motion to Dismiss, the “Aurelius Motions”), and (iii) the motion to dismiss filed in the abovecaptioned adversary proceeding (Adv. Proc. No. 17-228- LTS, Dkt. No. 88, the “UTIER Motion”) . 

Matter taken under advisement.

s/Marian Ramirez Rivera

Marian Ramirez Rivera

Deputy Clerk

In Re: 

The Financial Oversight and Management 

Board for Puerto Rico

as representative of

3:17-BK-3283 (LTS)

(Jointly Administered)

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al.

Debtors.

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2233 Filed:01/10/18 Entered:01/10/18 19:33:40 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 1
# C_2022202EN.01001201.xml

| 19.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/12

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2022/C 202/08)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 27 January 2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 88034 |
| Decision No | 013/22/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 wage subsidy scheme |
| Legal basis | Lov om lønnsstøtte |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Avoiding lay-offs during the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Form of aid | Direct grants |
| Budget | NOK 4 billion |
| Intensity | The maximum aid amount per employee cannot exceed 80 % of the individual gross salary, including the employer’s social security contributions |
| Duration | Until 30 June 2022 |
| Economic sectors | Sectors affected by containment measures, including, but not limited to accommodation, restaurant, tourism, and transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Norwegian Ministry of Finance |
| P.O. Box 8008 Dep |
| N-0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

27 January 2022

Case No

88034

Decision No

013/22/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 wage subsidy scheme

Legal basis

Lov om lønnsstøtte

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Avoiding lay-offs during the COVID-19 outbreak

Form of aid

Direct grants

Budget

NOK 4 billion

Intensity

The maximum aid amount per employee cannot exceed 80 % of the individual gross salary, including the employer’s social security contributions

Duration

Until 30 June 2022

Economic sectors

Sectors affected by containment measures, including, but not limited to accommodation, restaurant, tourism, and transport

Name and address of the granting authority

The Norwegian Ministry of Finance

P.O. Box 8008 Dep

N-0030 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
§ 360.7 Post-insolvency interest. ( a ) *Purpose and scope.* This section establishes rules governing the calculation and distribution of post-insolvency interest to creditors with proven claims in all FDIC-administered receiverships established after June 13, 2002.
( b ) *Definitions* — ( 1 ) *Equityholder.* The owner of an equity interest in a failed depository institution, whether such ownership is represented by stock, membership in a mutual association, or otherwise.
( 2 ) *Post-insolvency interest.* Interest calculated from the date the receivership is established on proven creditor claims in receiverships with surplus funds.
( 3 ) *Post-insolvency interest rate.* For any calendar quarter, the coupon equivalent yield of the average discount rate set on the three-month Treasury bill at the last auction held by the United States Treasury Department during the preceding calendar quarter, and adjusted each quarter thereafter.
( 4 ) *Principal amount.* The proven claim amount and any interest accrued thereon as of the date the receivership is established.
( 5 ) *Proven claim.* A claim that is allowed by a receiver or upon which a final non-appealable judgment has been entered in favor of a claimant against a receivership by a court with jurisdiction to adjudicate the claim.
( c ) *Post-insolvency interest distributions.* ( 1 ) Post-insolvency interest shall only be distributed following satisfaction by the receiver of the principal amount of all creditor claims.
( 2 ) The receiver shall distribute post-insolvency interest at the post-insolvency interest rate prior to making any distribution to equityholders. Post-insolvency interest distributions shall be made in the order of priority set forth in section 11(d)(11)(A) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1821(d)(11)(A).
( 3 ) Post-insolvency interest distributions shall be made at such time as the receiver determines that such distributions are appropriate and only to the extent of funds available in the receivership estate. Post-insolvency interest shall be calculated on the outstanding balance of a proven claim, as reduced from time to time by any interim dividend distributions, from the date the receivership is established until the principal amount of a proven claim has been fully distributed but not thereafter. Post-insolvency interest shall be calculated on a contingent claim from the date such claim becomes proven.
( 4 ) Post-insolvency interest shall be determined using a simple interest method of calculation.
[67 FR 34386, May 14, 2002]
§ 615.5100 Authority to issue. The Act authorizes each bank of the System, subject to the collateral requirements of section 4.3(c) of the Act, to issue: ( a ) Notes, bonds, debentures, or other similar obligations;
( b ) Consolidated obligations, together with any or all banks organized and operating under the same title of the Act;
( c ) Systemwide obligations, together with other banks of the System; and
( d ) Investment bonds to the authorized purchasers subject to the limitations contained in the regulations set forth in subpart D.
[54 FR 1160, Jan. 12, 1989]
# Official Journal C 379/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 379 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6417 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 379

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6417 September 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2021/C 379/01 | Position (EU) No 34/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Instrument for Pre-Accession assistance (IPA III) Adopted by the Council on 7 September 2021 | 1 |
| 2021/C 379/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 34/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA III) | 27 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2021/C 379/01

Position (EU) No 34/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Instrument for Pre-Accession assistance (IPA III) Adopted by the Council on 7 September 2021

1

2021/C 379/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 34/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA III)

27

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET. THIS INFORMATION IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000796370
<NAME> UNITED ASSET MANAGEMENT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         177,177
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               331,834
<PP&E>                                          73,458
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,369,572<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,406
<BONDS>                                        595,274<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           703
<OTHER-SE>                                     566,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,369,572
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               215,522
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  140,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,912<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,054
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,999
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,055
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,055
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES $958,678,000 OF COST ASSIGNED TO CONTRACTS ACQUIRED, NET.
<F2>INCLUDES $150,000,000 IN SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND $445,274,000 IN 
SUBORDINATED NOTES PAYABLE.
<F3>REPRESENTS AMORTIZATION OF COST ASSIGNED TO CONTRACTS ACQUIRED FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
|  

 

 
**Click    on map for more information about each area.** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         118,011
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               181,720
<PP&E>                                       2,259,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                 207,040
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,671,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          233,692
<BONDS>                                      1,195,184
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,041,830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,671,116
<SALES>                                        926,984
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               926,984
<CGS>                                           90,699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               353,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             115,733
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 76,625
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,263
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,362
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (11,296)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,066
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
# C_2019049EN.01001601.xml

| 7.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/16

---

Information notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority based on Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Repeal of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(2019/C 49/05)

| Member State | Norway |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Røros — Oslo v.v.
  Sogndal — Oslo v.v.
  Førde — Oslo v.v.
  Sandane — Oslo v.v.
  Sogndal — Bergen v.v.
  Førde — Bergen v.v.
  Sandane — Bergen v.v.
  Ørsta-Volda — Bergen v.v. |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 April 2016
  (announced on 7 May 2015 in the Official Journal of the European Union C 150 and EEA Supplement No 26/2015) |
| Date of repeal | 1 April 2020 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | Ministry of Transport and Communications |
| PO Box 8010 Dep |
| N-0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |
| Tel. +47 22249090 |
| Email: postmottak@sd.dep.no |

Member State

Norway

Route concerned

Røros — Oslo v.v.

Sogndal — Oslo v.v.

Førde — Oslo v.v.

Sandane — Oslo v.v.

Sogndal — Bergen v.v.

Førde — Bergen v.v.

Sandane — Bergen v.v.

Ørsta-Volda — Bergen v.v.

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 April 2016

(announced on 7 May 2015 in the Official Journal of the European Union C 150 and EEA Supplement No 26/2015)

Date of repeal

1 April 2020

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

Ministry of Transport and Communications

PO Box 8010 Dep

N-0030 Oslo

NORWAY

Tel. +47 22249090

Email: postmottak@sd.dep.no

---
42329.

#### STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. CALHOUN et al.

*Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*

Decided February 3, 1967.

*Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Richard L. Chambers, Assistant Attorney General, D. Field Yow, L. Clifford Adams, Deputy Assistant Attorneys General, Lon L. Fleming,*for appellant.

*Robert E. Knox, Warren D. Evans,*for appellees.

Eberhardt, Judge.

Our judgment *(State Hwy. Dept. v. Calhoun,*114 Ga. App. 501 (151 SE2d 806)), having been reversed by the Supreme Court *(Calhoun v. State Hwy. Dept.,*223 Ga. 65 (153 SE2d 418)), insofar as we applied the Act of 1966 (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 320, 327), (which the Supreme Court holds to be unconstitutional) and held that evidence admitted or a charge given contrary to the terms of that Act required a reversal of the judgment, we hereby conform our judgment as found in Division 5 (a, b) to that of the Supreme Court. Other portions of our judgment, being unaffected by the Supreme Court ruling, stand. Having so conformed, we find no error and the judgment of the trial court is

*Affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000796486
<NAME> ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         398,644
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,911<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,236,814<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,249,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      3,527,452
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           421
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,021,746)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,294,457
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               507,155
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  416,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             191,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (117,595)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,802)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (110,793)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,337)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (115,130)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.75)
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES NET OF ALLOWANCE
<F2>PP&E NET OF DEPRECIATION
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
89–006

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–974

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 111, MAKING FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001

OCTOBER 11, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 627]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 627, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration in the House of House

Joint Resolution 111, making further continuing appropriations for

fiscal year 2001. The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the joint resolution. The rule also provides one hour of

debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. Finally, the

rule provides one motion to recommit.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
MTI Technology Corporation:
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-46363, 333-50377, 333-18501 and 33-80438) on Form S-8 of MTI
Technology Corporation of our report dated May 20, 1998, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of MTI Technology Corporation and subsidiaries as of
April 4, 1998 and April 5, 1997 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the fiscal years ended April
4, 1998, April 5, 1997 and April 6, 1996, and related schedule, which report
appears in the April 4, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of MTI Technology
Corporation.
 
                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Orange County, California
July 1, 1998
EXHIBIT
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Arrow Resources
      Development, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended on March 31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, Peter Frugone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Peter
      Frugone





Peter
      Frugone





Date: May 15 ,
      2007.