alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,103
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,986
<INVENTORY>                                    156,648
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               336,066
<PP&E>                                          11,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,792
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 360,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          153,440
<BONDS>                                        110,638
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            93
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   360,351
<SALES>                                      1,058,275
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,058,275
<CGS>                                          967,491
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  967,491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                62,928
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,579
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,511
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,581
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,430
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,892)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,038
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.77


</TABLE>
§ 617.7400 What protections exist for borrowers who meet all loan obligations? ( a ) A qualified lender may not foreclose on a loan because the borrower failed to post additional collateral when the borrower has made all accrued payments of principal, interest, and penalties on the loan.
( b ) A qualified lender may not require a borrower to reduce the outstanding principal balance of a loan by any amount that exceeds the regularly scheduled principal installment when due and payable, unless: ( 1 ) The borrower sells or otherwise disposes of part, or all, of the collateral without the prior approval of the qualified lender and the proceeds from the sale or disposition are not applied to the loan; or
( 2 ) The parties agree otherwise in writing.
( c ) After a borrower has made all accrued payments of principal, interest, and penalties on a loan, the qualified lender may not enforce acceleration of the borrower's repayment schedule due to the borrower's untimely payment of those principal, interest, or penalty payments.
( d ) If a qualified lender places a loan in non-interest-earning status and this results in an adverse action being taken against the borrower, such as revoking any undisbursed loan commitment, the lender must document the change of status and promptly notify the borrower in writing of the action and the reasons for taking it. If the borrower was not delinquent on any principal, interest, or penalty payment at the time of such action and the borrower's request to have the loan placed back into accrual status is denied, the borrower may obtain a review of the denial before the CRC pursuant to § 617.7310 of this part. The borrower must request this review within 30 days after receiving the lender's notice.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                     EXHIBIT 23
                                                                    PAGE 1 OF 1

                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Thomas Group, Inc.
Irving, Texas

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8/S-3 (Registration
No. 33-71752) of our report dated March 3, 1997, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Thomas Group, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.





                                BDO SEIDMAN, LLP



Dallas, Texas
March 3, 1997
§ 611.1260 Payment of debts and assessments—terminating association. ( a ) *General rule.* If your institution is a terminating association, you must pay or make adequate provision for the payment of all outstanding debt obligations and assessments.
( b ) *No OFI relationship.* If the successor institution will not become an OFI, you must either: ( 1 ) Pay debts and assessments owed to your affiliated Farm Credit bank at termination; or
( 2 ) With your affiliated Farm Credit bank's concurrence, arrange to pay any obligations or assessments to the bank after termination.
( c ) *Obligations to other Farm Credit institutions.* You must pay or make adequate provision for payment of obligations to any Farm Credit institution (other than your affiliated bank) under any loss-sharing or other agreement.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3341

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to require 

the Comptroller General of the United States annually to report on 

whether amounts appropriated to carry out the grant programs authorized under such Act are adequate to permit grant recipients to meet 

the conditions imposed by receipt of the grant. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 20, 2003

Mr. ALLEN (for himself, Mr. STRICKLAND, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. MOORE, Mr. 

CASE, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. FILNER, Mr. FROST, Mr. ETHERIDGE, 

and Mr. HOEFFEL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to require the Comptroller General of the United 

States annually to report on whether amounts appropriated to carry out the grant programs authorized under 

such Act are adequate to permit grant recipients to 

meet the conditions imposed by receipt of the grant.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Adequate Yearly Fed5 eral Funding Report Act’’. 
2

•HR 3341 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REPORT ON SUFFICIENCY OF APPROPRIATIONS 

2 UNDER ESEA. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Elementary and Secondary 

4 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 note) is amended 

5 by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 9602. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON ADE7 QUATE YEARLY PROGRESS OF APPROPRIA8 TIONS. 

9 ‘‘The Comptroller General of the United States annu10 ally shall submit a report to the Congress on whether 

11 amounts appropriated for the preceding fiscal year to 

12 carry out each grant program authorized under this Act 

13 are adequate to permit grant recipients to meet the condi14 tions imposed by receipt of the grant.’’. 

15 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

16 for the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 

17 is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘Sec. 9602. Comptroller General report on adequate yearly progress of appropriations.’’.

Æ
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4316

_____________________________

EDWARD ABRUSCATO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County.

John H. Skinner, Judge.

August 13, 2019

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR FOR WRITTEN OPINION

We deny Appellant’s motion for rehearing, grant his motion 

for written opinion, and substitute the following opinion for the 

original one.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Butler v. State, 838 So. 2d 554, 556 (Fla. 2003) 

(“[W]hen section 921.024(2) [Fla. Stat.] applies so that the 

statutory maximum as provided in section 775.082[] is exceeded by 

the lowest permissible sentence under the code, the lowest 

permissible sentence under the code becomes the maximum 

sentence which the trial judge can impose.”); see also Busbee v. 

State, 187 So. 3d 1266, 1268-69 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (concluding 
2

lowest permissible sentence under code scoresheet would be 

appropriate rather than statutory maximum for two crimes 

committed).

WOLF, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Neil Dyment, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of LPA Holding Corp. and La
Petite Academy, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants' other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrants, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants' disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants' internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants' most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants' internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrants' other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants' auditors and the audit committee of the registrants' board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
like to adversely affect the registrants' ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants' internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: February 6, 2004

By /s/ Neil P. Dyment
  --------------------------
   Neil P. Dyment
   Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On September 2, 2009, the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of permit applications                           ( print page 53305)                        received. Permits were issued on October 9, 2009 to: Carlos Gutierrez, Permit No. 2010-008; Alexander R. Simms, Permit No. 2010-009.                

Nadene G. Kennedy,

Permit Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-24845 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,697
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,658
<INVENTORY>                                    104,339
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,196
<PP&E>                                          18,274
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          144,342
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,203,423
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,476,833)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,012
<SALES>                                        340,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               340,355
<CGS>                                          224,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (90,640)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (91,240)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (91,240)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 614.4353 Direct lender associations.

No direct lender association may make a loan to a borrower if the consolidated amount of all loans outstanding and undisbursed commitments to that borrower exceed 15 percent of the association's lending and leasing limit base.

[58 FR 40321, July 28, 1999, as amended at 64 FR 34517, June 28, 1999; 76 FR 29997, May 24, 2011]
II 

Calendar No. 555 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3234 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2003 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 14 Chestnut Street in Liberty, New York, 

as the ‘‘Ben R. Gerow Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 14 Chestnut Street in Liberty, New York, shall 

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Ben R. Gerow Post Of7 fice Building’’. 
2 

•HR 3234 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Ben R. Gerow Post Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 555 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3234 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postfice Building’’. erty, New York, as the ‘‘Ben R. Gerow Post Of- al Service located at 14 Chestnut Street in LibJUNE 7, 2004 

Reported without amendment
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          69,277
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  491,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    137,388
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               890,987
<PP&E>                                         113,489
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,420,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,029,421
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,299,096
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,059,954)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,420,825
<SALES>                                      2,848,560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,848,560
<CGS>                                        1,965,344
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,965,344
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,951,931
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (1,068,715)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,895
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,055,820)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (13,925)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,041,895)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,041,895)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
42638.

#### DARNELL v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY.

*Felton, C. J., and Hall, J., concur.*

Argued March 6, 1967

Decided March 9, 1967.

*Brannon & Brannon, Everett C. Brannon, Jr.,*for appellant.

*R. Wilson Smith, Jr., John H. Smith,*for appellee.

Ebhrhardt, Judge.

Plaintiff filed suit January 5, 1966, alleging a loss occurring October 23, 1964, covered by a policy issued to him by the defendant. On the basis of a policy provision that no suit could be brought after twelve months from the inception of the loss a motion by defendant for summary judgment was granted and plaintiff appeals, urging that the twelve-month limitation contained in the policy is at variance with the statute of limitation as to simple contracts (six years) in *Code*§ 3-705. *Held:*

“This court has decided that a contract limitation upon the right to sue, fixing a shorter period than that allowed by statute, is lawful, ‘provided the period fixed be not so unreasonable as to raise a presumption of imposition or undue advantage in some way.’ ” *Melson v. Phenix Ins. Co. of Brooklyn,*97 Ga. 722 (25 SE 189). A limitation of six months was sustained in *Brown v. Savannah Mutual Ins. Co.,*24 Ga. 97, and a twelve-months limitation was sustained in *Underwriters’ Agency v. Sutherlin,*55 Ga. 266; *Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. Gunter,*59 Ga. App. 189 (1) (200 SE 181); *Springfield Fire &, Marine Ins. Co. v. Carter,*110 Ga. App. 382 (138 SE2d 590); *Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. Powell,*113 Ga. App. 311 (147 SE2d 823). Moreover, *Code Ann.*§ 56-3201 provides for a standard form of policy to be prescribed by the Commissioner and the form prescribed, of which we may take judicial notice under § 8 of the Administrative Procedure Act (Ga. L. 1964, p. 338; Ga. L. 1965, p. 283), specifically prescribes a period of twelve months next after inception of the loss within which a suit may be brought on the policy.

*Judgment affirmed.*