alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 1016 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 - SW - 009 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
§ 380.33 Notice requirements. ( a ) *Notice by publication.* Promptly after its appointment as receiver for a covered financial company, the Corporation as receiver shall publish a notice to the creditors of the covered financial company to file their claims with the receiver no later than the claims bar date. The Corporation as receiver shall republish such notice 1 month and 2 months, respectively, after the date the notice is first published. The notice to creditors shall be published in one or more newspapers of general circulation where the covered financial company has its principal place or places of business. In addition to such publication in a newspaper, the Corporation as receiver may post the notice on the FDIC's Web site at *www.fdic.gov .*
( b ) *Notice by mailing.* At the time of the first publication of the notice to creditors, the Corporation as receiver shall mail a notice to present claims no later than the claims bar date to any creditor shown in the books and records of the covered financial company. Such notice shall be sent to the last known address of the creditor appearing in the books and records or appearing in any claim found in the records of the covered financial company.
( c ) *Notice by electronic media.* After publishing and mailing notice as required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the Corporation as receiver may communicate by electronic media with any claimant who expressly agrees to such form of communication.
( d ) *Discovered claimants.* Upon discovery of the name and address of a claimant not appearing in the books and records of the covered financial company, the Corporation as receiver shall, not later than 30 days after the discovery of such name and address, mail a notice to such claimant to file a claim no later than the claims bar date. Any claimant not appearing on the books and records that is discovered before the claims bar date shall be required to file a claim before the claims bar date, subject to the exception of § 380.35(b)(2). If a claimant not appearing on the books and records is discovered after the claims bar date, the Corporation as receiver shall notify the claimant to file a claim by a date not later than 90 days from the date appearing on the notice that is mailed to such creditor. Any claim filed after such date shall be disallowed, and such disallowance shall be final.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         158,960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,065,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                   199,317
<INVENTORY>                                  2,375,007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,481,397
<PP&E>                                         646,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                 325,465
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,986,158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,292,422
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        125
<COMMON>                                           533
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,459,145)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,986,158
<SALES>                                      5,133,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,133,924
<CGS>                                        3,225,926
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,813,688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,825,788
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             223,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,954,966)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,957,366)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,957,366
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.93)


</TABLE>
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

V\'E^-A OF 

'1 -! A ir OM 

Motion of 

EXECUTIVE AIRLINES, INC. d/b/a 

AMERICAN EAGLE 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41 , Schedule B-43) 

DOT-OST-1996-

1587 

MOTION OF EXECUTIVE AIRLINES, INC. d/b/a 

AMERICAN EAGLE FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

Executive Airlines, Inc. d/b/a American Eagle, under 1^ 

CFR 302.12, hereby moves that its Form 41, Schedule B-43 for 

YE2010 be accorded confidential treatment and be withheld from 

public disclosure. The information for which confidential 

treatment is requested pertains to Executive's airframes and 

aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements. 

In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 7 5 Fed. Reg. 41580, 

41582, we are uploading our confidential report electronically 

to the fol lowing website : h L up : //j^~:ub:ni i . 111a . •loi.. qr.^v 

On June 5, 1995, James W. Mitchell, Director, Office of 

Airline Statistics, granted confidential treatment for a 10-

year period to similar data filed by American Airlines. For 

the reasons stated in Mr. Mitchell's letter, the Department 

should grant the same relief here. 
- 2 -

WHEREFORE, Executive moves that its B-43 for YE2010 

be withheld from public disclosure under Rule 12 for a period 

of 10 years. 

Respectfully submitted. 

GJi^M y«o 

CARL B. NELSON 

Associate General Counsel 

American Airlines, Inc. 

On behalf of Executive Airlines, 

Inc. d/b/a American Eagle 

March 30, 2011
#### § 326.4 Reports.

The security officer for each institution shall report at least annually to the institution's board of directors on the implementation, administration, and effectiveness of the security program.
#### Rosario Penachio, Respondent, *v.*The Saati Society, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Eew York, second district, borough of Manhattan.

Andrea Palmeri, for appellant.

John Palmieri, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The by-laws of the defendant were modified four years before the plaintiff’s illness, by providing the said benefits were confined to members residing within Eew York, Brooklyn or Astoria. Subsequent to this amendment, the plaintiff signed the new by-laws and expressly declared his submission to the same. It being conceded that the plaintiff was a resident of Jersey City *752at the time of the illness in question, he was not entitled to sick benefits. The judgment awarding them is absolutely without proof to sustain it and must be reversed.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerioh and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05570**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 05570\05570_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 05570\05570_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 05570\05570_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 05570\05570_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05570\05570_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05570\05570_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05570\05570_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05570\05570_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 05570\Certification Statement_05570.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Asheville A5-2 Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Asheville A5-3 Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Asheville D2-3 FGD Pilot Test Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Asheville D3-1 POND-1 Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Asheville D3-1 WWT-1 Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Asheville D5-10 Constructed Wetland Enhancement Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Asheville D5-10 FGD Design Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Follow Up Responses 2.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 

### 05570\Supporting Documentation\05570_Follow Up Responses.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 31.1
                          CERTIFICATION

I, Greg Amato, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Epolin, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue  statements of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact  necessary  to make the statements made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under  which  such  statements  were   made,   not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,  and
other  financial  information included  in  this  report,  fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of  operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,  and  for,
the periods presented in this report;

      4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls  and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act  Rules  13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

           (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us  by  others  within  those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report  is
being prepared;

           (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report  our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls  and procedures, as of the end of the period covered  by
this report based on such evaluation; and

           (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting  that
occurred  during the small business issuer's most  recent  fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely  to
materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal  control
over financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and  I  have  disclosed, based on our most recent  evaluation  of
internal  control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a)    All   significant  deficiencies  and  material
weaknesses  in the design or operation of internal  control  over
financial  reporting  which are reasonable  likely  to  adversely
affect  the  small business issuer's ability to record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

           (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in  the
small   business   issuer's  internal  control   over   financial
reporting.



Dated: January 16, 2007             By:  /s/ Greg  Amato
                                    Greg Amato,
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL A. DORUNDO AND CYNTHIA M. 

DORUNDO,

Petitioners

v.

ROBERT BOBACK,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 304 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
§ 347.206 Domestic retail deposit activity requiring deposit insurance by U.S. branch of a foreign bank. ( a ) *Domestic retail deposit activity.* To initiate or conduct domestic retail deposit activity requiring deposit insurance protection in any state after December 19, 1991, a foreign bank must establish one or more insured U.S. bank subsidiaries for that purpose.
( b ) *Exception.* Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to any bank organized under the laws of any territory of the United States, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, or the Virgin Islands the deposits of which are insured by the FDIC pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.
( c ) *Grandfathered insured branches.* Domestic retail accounts with balances of less than an amount equal to the SMDIA that require deposit insurance protection may be accepted or maintained in an insured branch of a foreign bank only if such branch was an insured branch on December 19, 1991
( d ) *Change in ownership of grandfathered insured branch.* The grandfathered status of an insured branch may not be transferred, except in certain merger and acquisition transactions that the FDIC determines are not designed, or motivated by the desire, to avoid compliance with section 6(d)(1) of the International Banking Act (12 U.S.C. 3104(d)(1)).
[70 FR 17560, Apr. 6, 2005, as amended at 74 FR 47718, Sept. 17, 2009]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-27-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,386,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                   154,954
<INVENTORY>                                  7,689,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,551,951
<PP&E>                                      10,288,041
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,869,916
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,497,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,513,720
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        16,317
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,175,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,497,292
<SALES>                                     20,982,033
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,982,033
<CGS>                                       11,992,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,992,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,880,560
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                60,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             115,064
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,215
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,215
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,215
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROOSEVELT REED,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
ELEANOR VERNELL; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 15

- 35497

D.C. No. 3:14

- cv

- 05800

- RJB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert J. Bryan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 9, 2017 **

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Washington s tate prisoner Roosevelt Reed appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process

violations by prison officials. We have juris diction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

rev iew de novo

. Toguchi v. Chung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir

. 2004). We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 17 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 35497

affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Reed’s procedural

due process claim concerning deductions from his prison postage sub account

because Reed failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he

lacked an adequate post

- deprivation remedy under Washington law. See Hudson v.

Palmer , 468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984) (“[A]

. . . deprivation of property by a state

employee does not constitute a violation of the procedural requirements of the Due

Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment if a meaningful postdeprivation

reme dy for the loss is available.”); Wright v. Riveland , 219 F. 3d 905, 918 (9th Cir.

2000) (holding that Washington State Department of Corrections’ grievance

process and Washington State ’s tort claim process are adequate post

- deprivation

remedies for allegedly improper deductions from a prisoner’s account)

.
The distr ict court properly granted summary judgment on Reed’s substantive

due process claim because Reed failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as
to whether defendants’ conduct was egregious or shocks the conscience. County of

Sacramento v. Lewis , 52 3 U.S. 833, 845

- 49 (1998) (substantive due process
challenge must establish “egregious official conduct” that “shocks the
conscience”)

. Defendants’ request, set forth in the answering brief, that this court

determin e that the appeal is frivolous and const itutes a strike under 28 U.S.C.3 15

- 35497

§ 1915(e)(2)
, (g), is denied.

AFFIRMED.
59–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–265 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 3161) MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, FOOD AND 

DRUG ADMINISTRATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES PROGRAMS FOR THE 

FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2008, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

JULY 27, 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 581] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 581, by a record vote of 9 to 0, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3161) 

making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food 

and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the 

fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes, 

under an open rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. 

The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 

the bill except clauses 9 and 10 of rule XXI. The resolution waives 

points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply 

with clause 2 of rule XXI. During consideration of the bill for 

amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the Congressional Record. The resolution provides one motion to recommit with 

or without instructions. Finally, the resolution permits the Chair, 

during consideration of the bill in the House, to postpone further 

consideration of the bill to a time designated by the Speaker. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill 

(except for clauses 9 and 10 of rule XXI) includes a waiver of clause 

4(c) of rule XIII requiring the three-day availability of printed 

hearings on a general appropriations bill. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with REPORTS
2 

The waiver of clause 2 of rule XXI (prohibiting unauthorized appropriations or legislative provisions in an appropriations bill) 

against provisions in the bill is included because the bill contains 

unauthorized appropriations and legislative provisions. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 271 

Date: July 27, 2007. 

Measure: H.R. 3161. 

Motion by: Mr. McGovern. 

Summary of motion: To report the rule. 

Results: Adopted 9–0. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Yea; Matsui—Yea; Cardoza—Yea; 

Welch—Yea; Arcuri—Yea; Sutton—Yea; Dreier—Yea; Hastings 

(WA)—Yea; Slaughter—Yea. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with REPORTS