alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2999

To ensure by law the ability of the military service academies to include 

the offering of a voluntary, nondenominational prayer as an element 

of their activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 4, 2003

Mr. JONES of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. WILSON of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL

To ensure by law the ability of the military service academies 

to include the offering of a voluntary, nondenominational 

prayer as an element of their activities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PRAYER AT MILITARY SERVICE ACADEMY AC4 TIVITIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The superintendent of a service 

6 academy may have in effect such policy as the super7 intendent considers appropriate with respect to the offer8 ing of a voluntary, nondenominational prayer at an other-
2

•HR 2999 IH 

1 wise authorized activity of the academy, subject to such 

2 limitations as the President may prescribe. 

3 (b) SERVICE ACADEMIES.—For purposes of this sec4 tion, the term ‘‘service academy’’ means any of the fol5 lowing: 

6 (1) The United States Military Academy. 

7 (2) The United States Naval Academy. 

8 (3) The United States Air Force Academy.

Æ
# C_2014138EN.01002601.xml

| 8.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/26

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation)

(2014/C 138/04)

PART I

| Aid reference | GBER 1/14/EMP |
| --- | --- |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Granting authority | Name | Arbeids- og velferdsetaten (The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration) |
| | Address | PO Box 5 St. Olavs plass |
| NO-0130 Oslo |
| Norway |

Aid reference

GBER 1/14/EMP

EFTA State

Norway

Granting authority

Name

Arbeids- og velferdsetaten (The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration)

Address

PO Box 5 St. Olavs plass

NO-0130 Oslo

Norway

Webpage

www.nav.no

Title of the aid measure

Disability assistance in working life

(Funksjonsassistanse i arbeidslivet)

National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication)

Forskrift 11. desember 2008 nr. 1320 om arbeidsrettede tiltak mv.

(Reg. 1320/2008)

Web link to the full text of the aid measure

http://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2008-12-11-1320

Type of measure

Scheme

X

Amendment of an existing aid measure

GBER 6/12/EMP

EFTA Surveillance Authority aid number

Prolongation

X

Duration

Scheme

Unlimited

Economic sector(s) concerned

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

X

Type of beneficiary

SME

X

Large enterprises

X

Budget

Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme

Approx. NOK 36 millions

Aid instrument

(Article 5)

Grant

X

PART II

| General Objectives (list) | Objectives (list) | Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in NOK | SME
  – bonuses in % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid for disadvantaged and disabled workers
  (Articles 40-42) | Aid for the recruitment of disadvantaged workers in the form of wage subsidies
  (Article 40) | ...% | |
| | Aid for the employment of disabled workers in the form of wage subsidies
  (Article 41) | ...% | |
| | Aid for compensating the additional costs of employing disabled workers
  (Article 42) | Documented additional costs for the assistant, for one year at the time | |

General Objectives (list)

Objectives (list)

Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in NOK

SME

– bonuses in %

Aid for disadvantaged and disabled workers

(Articles 40-42)

Aid for the recruitment of disadvantaged workers in the form of wage subsidies

(Article 40)

...%

Aid for the employment of disabled workers in the form of wage subsidies

(Article 41)

...%

Aid for compensating the additional costs of employing disabled workers

(Article 42)

Documented additional costs for the assistant, for one year at the time

---
FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS December 18, 2015 ABELACOSTA, CLERK 

## 6l^A/0.-f

PD 0793-15 ^/•ruFte 

# "j^p^y IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
MITCHELL DEAN COCHRAN VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS PD-0793-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/18/2015 4:08:46 PM

Accepted 12/19/2015 11:36:13 AM ABEL ACOSTA CLERK

MOTION FOREXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: I. 

### COMES NOW, Appellant in the above styled case, and makes and 

### files this his request for an extensionoftime tofilehis motion to extend time to file a motion for rehearing and would show unto the Court the following:
COURT BELOW: CAUSE NUMBER BELOW: DATE FOR PETITION OF DISCRETIONARY REVIEW REFUSED: PRESENT DEADLINE FOR FILING APPELLANTS' PDR: Mitchel Dean Cochran 

### Tenth CourtofAppeals NO. 10-14-00013-CR

12-9-15

12-25-15DAYS REQUESTED BYTHIS 

### EXTENSION: 20 days from the date motion is due (1-14-16) DATE TO WHICH EXTENSION IS REQUESTED: 1-13-16 NUMBER OF EXTENSIONS PREVIOUSLY GRANTED: None I. 

### The Appellee's request is based upon the following reasonable 

### explanation ofthe need for additional time, within the personal knowledge ofCharles W. McDonald, the attorney signing this motion, T.R.A.P. 10.5(b), namely: II. 

### Due to the upcoming holidays, Counsel is scheduled to be out ofthe office until January4, 2016 andrequests an extensionto January 14, 2016.
III. 

### WHEREFORE, this Attorney for the Appellant prays that the Court 

### grant this motion and extend the time and deadline for the filing of Appellant's motion for rehearing, or the Court grant such additional time as isjustandproper. Respectfully submitted, /s/Charles W. McDonald Charles W. McDonald ATTORNEY AT LAW 2024 Austin Avenue Waco, Texas 76701 

### (254) 752-9901 FAX: (254) 754-1466 SBOTNO. 13538800 Mitchel Dean CochranCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy ofthis briefwas served electronically on December 18, 2015 to: (1) counsel 

## for the State, Sterling Harmon, sterkng.harmon@co.mclennan.tx.us; and (2) the State Prosecuting Attorney,lisa.mcminn@SPA.texas.gov. IslCharles W. McDonald Charles W. McDonald

Mitchel Dean Cochran
#### §§ 3.156-3.160 [Reserved]
§ 310.2 Definitions. For purposes of this part: ( a ) The term *Corporation* means the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation;
( b ) The term *individual* means a natural person who is either a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence;
( c ) The term *maintain* includes maintain, collect, use, disseminate, or control;
( d ) The term *record* means any item, collection or grouping of information about an individual that contains his/her name, or the identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual;
( e ) The term *system of records* means a group of any records under the control of the Corporation from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or some identifying number, symbol or other identifying particular assigned to the individual;
( f ) The term *designated system of records* means a system of records which has been listed and summarized in the Federal Register pursuant to the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e);
( g ) The term *routine use* means, with respect to disclosure of a record, the use of such record for a purpose which is compatible with the purpose for which it was created;
( h ) The terms *amend* or *amendment* mean any correction, addition to or deletion from a record; and
( i ) The term *system manager* means the agency official responsible for a designated system of records, as denominated in the Federal Register publication of “Systems of Records Maintained by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.”
[40 FR 46274, Oct. 6, 1975, as amended at 42 FR 6796, Feb. 4, 1977]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2879

To repeal the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2002. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2003

Mr. MICHAUD (for himself, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Mr. HINCHEY, Ms. LEE, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of 

California, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. STRICKLAND, Mr. STUPAK, and Mrs. 

JONES of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To repeal the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act 

of 2002.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF BIPARTISAN TRADE PROMOTION 

4 AUTHORITY ACT OF 2002. 

5 (a) REPEAL.—Division B of the Trade Act of 2002 

6 (19 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.), and the items relating to that 

7 division in the table of contents for that Act, are repealed. 

8 (b) AMENDMENTS.—The amendments made by sec9 tion 2110 of the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority 
2

•HR 2879 IH 

1 Act of 2002, as enacted, shall cease to be effective on the 

2 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53272-53273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24872]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel, Conference Grant Meeting 2.
    Date: November 9-12, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Lisa A Newman, SCD, Scientific Review Officer, 
DHHS, National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research 
Resources, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Room 1074--MSC 4874, Bethesda, 
MD 20892-4874, (301) 435-0965, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1a747f6d777b74767b285a777b737634747372347d756c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="83ede6f4eee2edefe2b1c3eee2eaefadedeaebade4ecf5">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel, INBRE 2009.
    Date: November 12, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 7 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center, 
Montgomery County Conference Center Facility, 5701 Marinelli Road, 
North Bethesda, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Lee Warren Slice, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0965.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical 
Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 93.306, 93.333; 93.702, 
ARRA Related Construction Awards., National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)


[[Page 53273]]


    Dated: October 8, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-24872 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001

35–342 PDF 2007

[ERRATA]

THE TRUTH IN CALLER ID ACT

HEARING

BEFORE THE

SUBCOMMITTEE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND

THE INTERNET

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND

COMMERCE

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION

ON

H.R. 503

FEBRUARY 28, 2007

Serial No. 110–8

(

Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Commerce

energycommerce.house.gov

[ERRATA]

110-8

An error was made on the cover of Serial No. 110-8. The bill

number should be ‘‘H.R 251’’ not ‘‘H.R 503’’.
Phone: 870-741-5760

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

# James Norton Boone CountyJudge

100N. Main Street, Suite 300 Harrison,AR 72601 May31,2013

Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE, Washington. D.C. 20590 Fox: 870-741-2855

'**-~'**



### c::. Regarding Essential Air Service at Harrison, Arkansas (Docket DOT -OST-1997-2935) Dear Mr. DeVany,
I appreciate this opportunity to submit comments regarding carrier selection for Essential Air Service at Harrison, Arkansas. As County Judge, my primary role is as Chief Executive Officer of Boone County's governmentwith a span ofresponsibility that includes Boone County Regional Airport (HRO). The airport is an important part ofour region's infrastructure and availability of quality and affordable air service plays a vital role in economic development and quality of life in Boone County. Understandably, and in no smart part dueto ourcommunity being without scheduled service for morethan a year after a previous EAS carrier ceased operations, we take the carrier selection process very seriously. Briefly with respect to each ofthe carrier proposals submitted: SeaPort Airlines has provided our community with good service since it began operations here in 2009, a factthat is reflected in our market's strong traffic growth. BoutiqueAir is untested as a scheduled air carrier and the risks tothe progress we have made rebuilding traffic at HRO outweigh any potential benefitfrom lowersubsidy.
Air Choice One is the most expensive bid and offers noservice advantages overthat provided or proposed by SeaPort. Our community has been very satisfied with the service provided by see SeaPortAirlines and strongly support its reselection to provide EAS at Harrison, Arkansas. We have made great strides in rebuilding traffic at Boone County Regional Airport and believe reselection ofSeaPort best serves our community's interests. Moreover, SeaPort's request for lower subsidy than it currently is paid serves the interests ofthe EAS program and results in my. support ofSeaPort's request for a four-year EAS contract.

### Mr. Dennis DeVany Page2 · May 31, 2013 Again, thank you forthis opportunity to comment and thank you for yourwork on behalf Harrison and other EAS communities across ourcountry. Sincerely yours,

### ~--·?······ 

### ...**-~f ~**  James Norton Boone County Judge
§ 349.23 Unlawful representations. ( a ) *No implication or representation of limiting losses.* No FDIC-supervised insured depository institution engaged in retail foreign exchange transactions or its IAPs may imply or represent that it will, with respect to any retail customer forex account, for or on behalf of any person: ( 1 ) Guarantee such person or account against loss;
( 2 ) Limit the loss of such person or account; or
( 3 ) Not call for or attempt to collect margin as established for retail forex customers.
( b ) *No implication of representation of engaging in prohibited acts.* No FDIC-supervised insured depository institution or its IAPs may in any way imply or represent that it will engage in any of the acts or practices described in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *No Federal government endorsement.* No FDIC-supervised insured depository institution or its IAPs may represent or imply in any manner whatsoever that any retail forex transaction or retail forex product has been sponsored, recommended, or approved by the FDIC, the Federal government, or any agency thereof.
( d ) *Assuming or sharing of liability from bank error.* This section shall not be construed to prevent an FDIC-supervised insured depository institution from assuming or sharing in the losses resulting from the FDIC-supervised insured depository institution's error or mishandling of a retail forex transaction.
( e ) *Certain guaranties unaffected.* This section shall not affect any guarantee entered into prior to the effective date of this part, but this section shall apply to any extension, modification or renewal thereof entered into after such date.
[76 FR 40789, July 12, 2011. Redesignated at 80 FR 74912, Nov. 30, 2015]
§ 329.101 Determining maturity. For purposes of calculating its net stable funding ratio, including its ASF amount and RSF amount, under subparts K through N, an FDIC-supervised institution shall assume each of the following: ( a ) With respect to any NSFR liability, the NSFR liability matures according to § 329.31(a)(1) of this part without regard to whether the NSFR liability is subject to § 329.32;
( b ) With respect to an asset, the asset matures according to § 329.31(a)(2) of this part without regard to whether the asset is subject to § 329.33 of this part;
( c ) With respect to an NSFR liability or asset that is perpetual, the NSFR liability or asset matures one year or more after the calculation date;
( d ) With respect to an NSFR liability or asset that has an open maturity, the NSFR liability or asset matures on the first calendar day after the calculation date, except that in the case of a deferred tax liability, the NSFR liability matures on the first calendar day after the calculation date on which the deferred tax liability could be realized; and
( e ) With respect to any principal payment of an NSFR liability or asset, such as an amortizing loan, that is due prior to the maturity of the NSFR liability or asset, the payment matures on the date on which it is contractually due.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 

## FEB 2 7 2012
Mr. RobertJ. Kard AirPollution Control Officer San Diego CountyAir Pollution Control District 10124 Old Grove Road San Diego, California 92131 Re: Potential classification ofSan Diego County as Serious nonattainment for the 1997 ozone national ambient ir quality standard

Th you for your letter dated January 13, 2012 to Gina McCarthy, AssistantAdministrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Office ofAir and Radiation. Your letterrequests that EPA not classifythe San Diego nonattainment area as Serious for the 1997 ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). We appreciate hearing your concerns aboutpotential planning and permitting requirements associated with a Serious ozone nonattainment classification. We have been working closely with you and your staffand with EPA's national Office ofAir QualityPlanning and Standards to address your issues. We will keep you informed as ourrulemakingproceeds. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me orAmyZimpfer, Associate Director, AirDivision, at 415-947-4146 or zimpfer.amy@epa.gov. Sincerely,

cc: Mr. James Goldstene, California Air Resources Board
May 21, 2015

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 21st day of May, 2015.

10-14-00287-CR	CHRISTOPHER WAYNE DOUGLAS v. THE STATE OF TEXAS - ON APPEAL FROM THE 82nd DISTRICT COURT OF ROBERTSON COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. 13-10-19777-CR – AFFIRMED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Davis:

	“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the Court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the judgment be in all things affirmed, and that the appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
#### BILBRO V. THE STATE.

(Decided May 13, 1913.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court.

Heard before Hon. H. B. Foster.

No counsel marked for appellant. E. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for tbe State.

Pelham, J. —

No bill of exceptions and no error in tbe record. Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 200 (Monday, October 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Flathead Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Flathead Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Kalispell, Montana. The committee is meeting as authorized under the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-
343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The 
purpose of the meeting is to hear project proposal presentations for 
2009.

DATES: The meetings will be held November 3, 10 and 17, and December 1 
and 8, 2009. Each meeting will be held 4-6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 650 Wolfpack Way, Flathead 
National Forest Office, Kalispell, MT. Written comments should be sent 
to Flathead National Forest, Attn: RAC, 650 Wolfpack Way, Kalispell, MT 
59901. Comments may also be sent via e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8eeae9ebfce3efe0e0cee8fda0e8ebeaa0fbfd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bedad9dbccd3dfd0d0fed8cd90d8dbda90cbcd">[email protected]</span></a> or 
via facsimile to 406.758.5351.
    All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are 
placed in the record and are available for public inspection and 
copying. The public may inspect comments received at 650 Wolfpack Way, 
Kalispell, MT. Visitors are encouraged to call ahead to 406.758.5252 to 
facilitate entry into the building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise Germann, Flathead National 
Forest, 406.758.5252.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The 
following business will be conducted: presentation of 2009 project 
proposals and approval of projects. Persons who wish to bring related 
matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements 
with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public input 
sessions will be provided and individuals who made written requests by 
three calendar days prior to the meeting will have the opportunity to 
address the Committee at those sessions.

    Dated: October 9, 2009.
Denise Germann,
Designated Federal Officer, Flathead Resource Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-24902 Filed 10-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>