alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
September 17, 2015

Mr. Jorge Uribe

1430 South Dixie Highway, Suite 110

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Dear Mr. Uribe:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§§ 61.1 to 61.429 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can 

not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your June 4, 2015 exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2723, but 

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
EXHIBIT 10.16

                                  FEE AGREEMENT

This FEE AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") made as of April 23, 2001 is by and
between GourmetMarket.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with its principal
place of business at 7000 W. Palmetto Park Road, Suite 501, Boca Raton, Florida
33433, and Michael D. Karsch, with his principal place of business at 7000 W.
Palmetto Park Road, Boca Raton, Florida 33433, ("Karsch").

                                R E C I T A L S:
                                 - - - - - - - -

The Company is a public company with a class of equity securities publicly
traded, and desires to retain Karsch to provide certain legal services.

Karsch desires to provide certain legal services to the Company in accordance
with the terms and conditions contained hereinafter.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the
parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

1. LEGAL SERVICES. During the term of this Agreement, Karsch is hereby retained
by the Company to provide legal services to the Company. Karsch shall provide
such services as reasonably requested by the Company during the term of this
Agreement, provided that nothing hereunder shall require Karsch to devote a
minimum number of hours per calendar month toward the performance of services
hereunder.

2. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be for six months commencing as of the
date first written above and terminating one day prior to the first anniversary
hereof; provided, however, that this Agreement shall be renewable for subsequent
six-month terms, by mutual agreement of the parties in writing, at least thirty
(30) days prior to the expiration of the then current term.

3. COMPENSATION. In consideration for the performance of services hereunder, the
Company hereby agrees to pay Karsch the aggregate sum of 800,000 shares of the
Company's common stock as compensation for the term of this Agreement within 30
days of the execution of this Agreement. The Company hereby agrees to pay on a
pre-approval basis reasonable expenses incurred by Karsch in connection with
such services to be rendered hereunder.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written.


KARSCH:                                         COMPANY:


 /s/ Michael D. Karsch                          By: /s/C. Lawrence Rutstein
 ---------------------------                        -----------------------
 Michael D. Karsch                              C. Lawrence Rutstein, Chairman
#### John Carney, Appellant, *v.*The Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, third district, borough of Manhattan.

R. Gibson. Jr., for appellant.

H. A. Robinson, for respondent.

*782
      *Per Curiam.*

The evidence shows that while the car was going at a “ terrific ” rate of speed — fifteen miles an hour — it ran into-the plaintiff who was crossing Fourth avenue at Thirtieth street, in the city of New York. Plaintiff testified that he looked northward, as he started to cross the railroad track and saw no car approaching. The evidence also shows that the motorman on the car made no effort to stop the car. This evidence was sufficieiit to go to the jury upon the question of the plaintiff’s freedom from negligence, and, therefore, it was error to dismiss the complaint.

Present: Tbuax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.
#### § 5.66 Dividends payable in property other than cash.

In addition to cash dividends, directors of a national bank may declare dividends payable in property, with the approval of the OCC. A national bank must submit a request for prior approval of a noncash dividend to the appropriate OCC licensing office. The dividend is equivalent to a cash dividend in an amount equal to the actual current value of the property, regardless of whether the book value is higher or lower under GAAP. Before the dividend is declared, the bank should show the difference between actual value and book value on the books of the national bank as a gain or loss, as applicable, and the dividend should then be declared in the amount of the actual current value of the property being distributed.

[85 FR 80469, Dec. 11, 2020]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                          SIGNAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert N. Nelsen, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Signal Technology
Corporation;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 31, 2003

/s/ ROBERT N. NELSEN
------------------------------------
Robert N. Nelsen
Chief Financial Officer

                                       48
#### § 381.12 Enforcement.

The Board and Corporation may jointly enforce an order jointly issued by the Board and Corporation under § 381.9(a) or (c). The Board, in consultation with the Corporation, may take any action to address any violation of this part by a covered company under section 8 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1818).
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3255 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3255

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3710 West 73rd Terrace in Prairie Village, Kansas, as the ``Senator 
                    James B. Pearson Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 2003

 Mr. Moore (for himself, Mr. Ryun of Kansas, Mr. Tiahrt, and Mr. Moran 
  of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3710 West 73rd Terrace in Prairie Village, Kansas, as the ``Senator 
                    James B. Pearson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENATOR JAMES B. PEARSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3710 West 73rd Terrace in Prairie Village, Kansas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Senator James B. Pearson Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Senator 
James B. Pearson Post Office.
                                 <all>
```
1

Ogulei, David

From: Nancy L Paddock <nancy.paddock@veoliaes.com>

Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 9:25 AM

To: Ogulei, David

Cc: Dennis J Warchol

Subject: Another round of revisions

Attachments: kBoiler 1rev6.doc; A5 Form PTE Summary(2 of 2)rev6marked.doc; A5 Form PTE Summary(2 

of 2)rev6clean.doc; Emissions Calcs from Application from Veolia 12-10-13.xlsx

Let me know if this isn’t everything.

Nancy Paddock 

Environmental Engineering Specialist 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 

7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, IL 62201 

618.271.2804 (x-115) 

618.271.2128 (fax) 

 

Nancy.Paddock@VeoliaES.com

www.VeoliaES.com

 

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 

contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If 

you are not the intended recipient, please communicate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the 

original message and delete it from all computers.
Exhibit 31.2
                          CERTIFICATION

I, James Ivchenko, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Epolin, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue  statements of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact  necessary  to make the statements made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under  which  such  statements  were   made,   not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,  and
other  financial  information included  in  this  report,  fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of  operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,  and  for,
the periods presented in this report;

      4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls  and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act  Rules  13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

           (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us  by  others  within  those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report  is
being prepared;

           (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report  our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls  and procedures, as of the end of the period covered  by
this report based on such evaluation; and

           (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting  that
occurred  during the small business issuer's most  recent  fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely  to
materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal  control
over financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and  I  have  disclosed, based on our most recent  evaluation  of
internal  control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a)    All   significant  deficiencies  and  material
weaknesses  in the design or operation of internal  control  over
financial  reporting  which are reasonable  likely  to  adversely
affect  the  small business issuer's ability to record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

           (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in  the
small   business   issuer's  internal  control   over   financial
reporting.



Dated: October  13,  2006    By:   /s/  James Ivchenko
                                   James Ivchenko,
                                   President
                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
# ----------------.......**:""~,** r- 1

## 7·· "EN·r**a·~** :· !'A'1 ·'II 

### t U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

## TRANSPORTATIO~:;t'!::\r)Ab?)ATI()~J 0 , · '· .,[ Vll I 1,,/i

ffice ofHearmgs 

### :{c·l··· 

### tloccp.•,/·l(")t'''S
,.,....... r .. 111 , .• " Washington, D.C. ·

Kalitta Air, LLC 

# RECEIVED FAA Docket No.
____ _ (EIR 2011-GL-23-0099)

(Civil Penalty Action) 

## .AUG- 7 2012 

# HEARING DOCKET Administrative Law Judge:-------

NOTICE AND ENTRY OF APPEARANCE TO THE CLERK OF SAID COURT: The appearance ofthe undersigned attorney for the above-named Respondent, Kalitta Air, LLC, in the above-entitled cause is hereby filed. Dated: July 27, 2012**~·~· ·-"·~·1'~6:**  

## ......Chris G.**zur~ies**

# ... ····· Senior Attorney Federal Aviation Administration Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60018

# ~ "../ ........**~/ ~,/::---**  

### ..•/

# ~;~:f~iawaroup,z ( George W. Kelsey (MI Bar# P15855) Attorney for Respondent 2395 S. Huron Parkway, Suite 200 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 (734) 973-1222 Telephone

### PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned appears herein as attorney for the abovenamed Respondent, Kalitta Air, LLC, in the above-entitled cause.
Dated: July 27, 2012

# ~~ George W. Kelsey (MI Bar# P15855) Attorney for Respondent 2395 S. Huron Parkway, Suite 200 

### Ann Arbor, MI 48104 (734) 973-1222 Telephone



### _ .. -CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice and Entry of Appearance has been mailed this 27th day ofJuly, 2012, by First Class Mail to: Original and One Copy: Hearing Docket Federal Aviation Administration Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilber Wright Building

- Suite 2W1 000 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 One Copy: Chris G. Zurales Senior Attorney

...**-.f~Q.~ral_J~.yiation Administr~tion.** 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60018 Phone: (847) 294-7713 Fax: (847) 294-7498 Dated this 27th day ofJuly, 2012
Renee C. Alexander Legal Secretary
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert J. Crowell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Elcom International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
      the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 26, 2004


/s/ Robert J. Crowell

Robert J. Crowell
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00147-CR

EX PARTE Herbey Medrano DEHOYOS

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-1196-B

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 12, 2013

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal by withdrawing his notice of appeal. 

The motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
#### § 336.9 Finality of determination.

Any determination made by the FDIC pursuant to this part shall be at the FDIC's sole discretion and shall not be subject to further review.
#### PORTO RICAN AMERICAN TOBACCO CO., RESPONDENT, v. THE ESSEX COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION AND THE CITY OF NEWARK, APPELLANTS.

Submitted October 27, 1939

Decided January 25, 1940.

For the appellants, *James F. X. O’Brien.*

For the respondent, *Parnell & Krueger.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered *per curiam*in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance—The*Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teenchard, Case, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Hague, JJ. 12.

*For reversal*— None.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics
- Resources

HomeOffice of the Ombuds...Resources – Office of the Ombuds

# 									Resources							

Office of the Ombuds

The Office of the Ombuds provides a variety of resources for Department of State employees. An overview of these services can be found on this page. Employees can access more information through the Department intranet.

**When Do You Need an Ombuds?**
        - Want to address a concern early, before it escalates or worsens.
        - Are unclear about the Department’s policies and procedures and how they apply to you.
        - Are uncertain where to take a work problem.
        - Want an independent facilitator to assist you in working through a problem.
        - Want help in addressing an issue in a non-adversarial manner.
        - Feel you have been treated unfairly.

Back to Top
VASILIY BABICHEV,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5363

Opinion filed May 4, 2016.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Vasiliy Babichev, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

WOLF, WETHERELL, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.