# TheAttorney General ofTexas

March 10, 1983

JIM MATTOX Attorney General

SupremeCourtBuilding P.0.BOX12546 Austin.TX.76711.2546 512/475-2501 Telex910/674-1367 Telecopier 5121475.0266

1607MamSt..Suite14W Dallas.TX.752014703 2141742.6944

4624AlbertaAve..Suite164 ElPaso.TX.79905.2793 9)433-3464

1220cum be.. we 202 HOUS~O”.

TX.77002.6966 7131650-0666

606Broadway.Suite312 Lubbock.TX.79401.3479 0061747-5236

4309N.Tenth.Suitee McAllen.TX.76501-1665 5121662-4547

200MaInPlaza.SUlW4w SanAnk,“,o.TX~76205.2797 512,2254191 Mr. Edward0. Coultas Executive Director State Bar of Texas P. 0. Box 12487. Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 Opinion No. JM-7

Be: Whether District of Columbia professional corporation needs a certificate of authority to transact business in Texas

Dear Mr. Coultas:

You ask whether an Individual whopractices law in the District of Columbia and Is not licensed to practice in the state of Texas, yet whois apartner in ageneral partnership organized under the laws of the state of Texas, mayIncorporate a professional corporation under the laws of the District of Columbia and substitute it for himself as
a partner In the Texas partnership. If so. you then ask whether the foreign professional corporation is deemed to be transacting business in the state of Texas and is thus required to obtain a certificate of authority from the secretary of state.

In our opinion, any corporation acting as a general partner of a Texas partnership transacting business in Texas is itself transacting business in Texas. See Attorney General Opinion WW-191 (1958). A partnership under theTexas Uniform Partnership Act is defined as “an association of twoor more persons to carry on as co-owners abusiness for profit.” V.T.C.S. art. 6132b. 16. The term “persons” includes corporations. V.T.C.S. art. 6132b, 56-A. This definition also pertains to professional corporations by virtue of article 1528e. section 5. V.T.C.S.. which provides that “professional corporations shall enjoy the powers and privileges and be subject to the duties, restrictions and liabilities of other business corporations except insofar as the samemaybe limited or enlarged by this Act.” If the partnership business is carried on in Texas, each partner is also transacting business in this state. because every partner is anagent of the partnership for the purpose of partnership business, and every partner has an equal right in the management and conduct of the business. V.T.C.S. art. 6132b. $09. 18. See Scott Company of California v. Enco Construction Company, 264 So.2d 409 (Hiss. 1972); 17W. Fletcher, Cyclopedia of the Lawof Private Corporations, P8464 (1977). Cf. Williams v. Freeport Sulphur Company, 40 S.W.Zd 817. 824 (Tex. Civ.pp. - Galveston 1931, writ ref ’d).

p. 27Mr. Edward 0. Coultns - Page 2 (JM-7)

Thus, in order for the professional corporation/partner to transact business in this state, it would be necessary for the corporation to be authorized to do business in Texas. The Texas Professional Corporation Act, article 15281~. V.T.C.S., does not provide for the registration of foreign professional corporations In Texas. Such authority may not be obtained by registration as a foreign corporation under the Texas Business Corporation Act. Section 5 of the Texas Professional Corporation Act provides that the Texas Business Corporation Act shall be applicable to professional corporations except to the extent that the provisions of the Texas Business Corporation Act conflict with the provisions of the Texas Professional Corporation Act. The failure of the Texas Professional Corporation Act to provide for the registration of foreign professional corporations indicates the legislature’s intent that such corporations not be authorized to do business in the state of Texas. Useof the provisions of the Texas Business Corporation Act to supply such authority would constitute aconflict with the Texas Professional Corporation Act. Although the Texas Professional Corporation Act has not been construed by a court in this regard, at least one other jurisdiction has found that the failure of its professional corporation act to provide for the registration of s foreign nrofessional cornoration orohibits a foreien nrofessional cornoration from doing business in the state. Dalton, Dalton, Little, ‘Inc. v. Mirandi. 41’2 F. Supp. 1001 (D. N.J. 1976). Accord, Ariz. Op. Att’y Gen. 71-38 (Oct. 27, 1971); N.C. Op. Att’y Gen. (Aug. 26, 1970); Minn. Op. Att’y Gen. 92b-18 (Apr. 6, 1965). in our opinion, in order for the professional corporation which Is the subject of your request to be able to transact business in this state as a partner in the practice of law. that corporation will have to comply with the provisions of the Texas Professional Corporation Act. That is. it will have to become a domestic professional corporation in the state of Texas.

SUMMARY

A foreign corporation that is a partner in a general partnership organized under the laws of the state of Texas is deemed to be transacting business In the state and, thus, is required to obtain a certificate of authority from the secretary of state. The samerule would apply to
a foreign professional corporation, except that the secretary has no authority to grant the certificate to aforeign professional, rather than business, corporation. The absence of any licensing provision for a foreign corporation to do business in the state of Texas Indicates that the legislature did not wish to allow a foreign professional corporation to carry on any A

p. 28Mr. Edward0. Coultas - Page 3 (JM-7)

activities that amount to transacting business in this state. Thus, because being a partner would amount to transacting business In this state, and the foreign professional corporation could not be licensed under the usual corporation licensing provisions, the foreign professional corporation maynot participate ss a partner in a partnership organized under the laws of the state of Texas.
Very truly you 

# JAi&

LA JIM MATTOX Attorney General of Texas

TOMGREEN First Assistant Attorney General

DAVIDR. RICHARDS Executive Assistant Attorney General
Prepared byCatherine B. Fryer Assistant Attorney General

APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMITTEE

Susan L. Garrison, Chairman Catherine B. Fryer Rick Gilpin JimMoellinger

p. 29