alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.33

                                Compositech Ltd.
                               120 Ricefield Lane
                               Hauppauge, NY 11788


                                                                   June 26, 2000

SovCap Equity Partners, Ltd.
Sovereign Capital Advisors, LLC
3340 Peachtree Road, NE, Suite 1965
Atlanta, Georgia 30326
Facsimile:
Attention: Mr. Paul D. Hamm

Dear Sirs:

     Reference is made to the Series 1 Bridge Note Purchase and Security
Agreement, dated March 16, 1999, by and among Compositech Ltd. and the
Purchasers listed therein (the "Note Purchase Agreement"), as amended by that
certain First Amendment to the Series 1 Bridge Note Purchase and Security
Agreement, dated April 21, 1999 and executed by the Company and certain
Purchasers in connection with the Second Closing (the "First Amendment"), that
certain Second Amendment to the Series 1 Bridge Note Purchase and Security
Agreement, dated July 28, 1999, and executed by the Company and certain
Purchasers in connection with the Third Closing (the "Second Amendment"), that
certain Letter Agreement, dated November 22, 1999, and executed by the Company
and the Purchasers (the "November Letter Agreement") and that certain Letter
Agreement dated April 21, 2000 (the "April Letter Agreement", together with the
Note Purchase Agreement, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, and the
November Letter Agreement the "Purchase Agreement") and the Attached Repricing
Warrant, attached to Restated Bridge Note Number 7 (the "Repricing Warrant").
Defined terms, used but not defined herein, have the meanings ascribed thereto
in the Purchase Agreement or the Repricing Warrant.

     The parties hereto agree that the Repricing Warrant is hereby amended by
striking the word "ninetieth" and the parenthetical "(90th)" from the definition
of Expiration Date and inserting into the definition in place of such number and
parenthetical "one hundred and eightieth (180th)".

     This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York
without regard to the conflicts of law doctrine of such state.

     This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall
constitute an integral original part of one and the same original instrument.


<PAGE>


     If the foregoing correctly sets forth the understanding among us, please
indicate your agreement and acceptance by signing below.


                                   Sincerely,


                                        COMPOSITECH LTD.


                                        By:
                                           -------------------------------------
                                              Samuel Gross
                                              Executive Vice President


Acknowledged, agreed and accepted by the undersigned:

SOVCAP EQUITY PARTNERS LTD.


By:
     -------------------------------
         Authorized Signatory
§ 367.15 Additional proceedings as to disputed material facts. ( a ) In actions not based upon a conviction or civil judgment, if the Ethics Counselor finds that the contractor's submission raises a genuine dispute over facts material to the proposed suspension and/or exclusion, the contractor shall be afforded an opportunity to appear (with counsel, if desired), submit documentary evidence, present witnesses, and confront any witnesses the FDIC presents.
( b ) The Ethics Counselor may refer disputed material facts to another official for analysis and recommendation.
( c ) If requested, a transcribed record of any additional proceedings shall be made available at cost to the contractor.
§ 263.108 Responses to application. ( a ) *By counsel for the Board.* ( 1 ) Within 20 days after service of an application, counsel for the Board may file an answer to the application.
( 2 ) The answer shall explain in detail any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on in support of the Board's position. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the answer shall include either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 263.109, or both.
( b ) *Reply to answer.* The applicant may file a reply only if the Board has addressed in its answer any of the following issues: that the position of the agency was substantially justified, that the applicant unduly protracted the proceedings, or that special circumstances make an award unjust. Any reply authorized by this section shall be filed within 15 days of service of the answer. If the reply is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the reply shall include either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 263.109, or both.
( c ) *Additional response.* Additional filings in the nature of pleadings may be submitted only by leave of the administrative law judge.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3161 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 3161

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2003

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To ratify the authority of the Federal Trade Commission to establish a 
                         do-not-call registry.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL DO-NOT-CALL REGISTRY.

    (a) Authority.--The Federal Trade Commission is authorized under 
section 3(a)(3)(A) of the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse 
Prevention Act (15 U.S.C. 6102(a)(3)(A)) to implement and enforce a 
national do-not-call registry.
    (b) Ratification.--The do-not-call registry provision of the 
Telemarketing Sales Rule (16 C.F.R. 310.4(b)(1)(iii)), which was 
promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission, effective March 31, 2003, 
is ratified.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2023265EN.01000601.xml

| 28.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/6

---

NOTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 29(2) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS

Publication of a vacancy for the function of Deputy Director-General

(Grade AD 15)

in the Directorate-General for Interpretation (DG SCIC)

COM/2023/10435

(2023/C 265/03)

The European Commission has published a vacancy notice (reference COM/2023/10435) for the function of Deputy Director-General (Grade AD 15) in the Directorate-General for Interpretation (DG SCIC).

To consult the text of the vacancy notice in 24 languages and to submit your application, please visit this dedicated webpage on the European Commission’s website: https://europa.eu/!fjVnxX

---
§ 265.10 Functions delegated to the Director of the Division of Monetary Affairs. The Director of the Division of Monetary Affairs (or the Director's delegatee) is authorized: ( a ) *Term Deposit Facility (TDF) test operations.* With the concurrence of the General Counsel, and in consultation with the Chair if feasible, to adjust the terms and conditions of individual TDF test operations that raise significant technical or operational issues, including but not limited to the authority to: ( 1 ) Delay the open of a TDF operation;
( 2 ) Extend the close of a TDF operation;
( 3 ) Reschedule a TDF operation; and
( 4 ) Delay the announcement of TDF operation results.
( b ) *Regulation D.* With the concurrence of the General Counsel, to approve the annual indexation of the reserve requirement exemption amount and low reserve tranche amount under Regulation D (12 CFR part 204), so long as no change is proposed to any of the formulas by which these amounts are calculated.
( c ) *Form FR 2900.* With the concurrence of the General Counsel— ( 1 ) To reassess the deposit reporting threshold each year, starting in February 2022, as is necessary to maintain a weekly reporting panel of 1,000 institutions comprised of foreign-related reporters and the largest M2 deposit holders for the weekly Report of Deposits and Vault Cash (Form FR 2900); and
( 2 ) To determine the frequency with which the deposit reporting threshold is reassessed (*e.g.,* annually or less frequently than annually) consistent with maintaining a stable panel of weekly reporters for the Form FR 2900 and enabling accurate construction of the monetary aggregates.
[87 FR 54003, Sept. 1, 2022, as amended at 88 FR 32622, May 22, 2023; 88 FR 80109, Nov. 17, 2023]
# C_2022309EN.01000301.xml

| 16.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

15 August 2022

(2022/C 309/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0195 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4373 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84375 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4980 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9631 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 140,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8710 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,460 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 398,60 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6858 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8849 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,3143 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4508 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3167 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,9899 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6002 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4036 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 336,35 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7375 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9050 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5028 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 042,36 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5465 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,122 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,218 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2268 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,3914 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,0610 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0195

JPY

Japanese yen

135,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4373

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84375

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4980

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9631

ISK

Iceland króna

140,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8710

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,460

HUF

Hungarian forint

398,60

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6858

RON

Romanian leu

4,8849

TRY

Turkish lira

18,3143

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4508

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3167

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,9899

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6002

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4036

KRW

South Korean won

1 336,35

ZAR

South African rand

16,7375

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9050

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5028

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 042,36

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5465

PHP

Philippine peso

57,122

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,218

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2268

MXN

Mexican peso

20,3914

INR

Indian rupee

81,0610

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Belen Ramos, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB (the “Quarterly Report”) of Dynatem, Inc. (the “Company”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and otherfinancial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

 

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report was beingprepared; 

 

(b) Omitted; 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter, in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of theCompany’s board of directors: 

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: October 13, 2004
#### § 308.141 Notice of hearing.

Within ten days after expiration of the period for receipt of comments pursuant to § 308.140, the Administrative Officer shall serve upon the applicant and any person who has requested an opportunity to be heard written notification indicating the place and time of the hearing. The hearing shall be held not later than 30 days after service of the notification of hearing. The notification shall contain the name and address of the presiding officer designated by the Administrative Officer and a statement of the matters to be considered.

[86 FR 2249, Jan. 12, 2021]
1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United Stat es District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-3435

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Brian Todd Tracy, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 6, 2010 Filed: May 11, 2010

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Brian Tracy was charged with possessing child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B) and (b)(2). Tracy pleaded guilty inaccord with a written plea agreement, which contained an app eal waiver. The district court 1 sentenced Tracy to 84 months in prison, below the advisory Gu idelines range. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the reasonableness of the senten ce and the adequacy of the plea-hearing colloquy.-2- We will enforce the appeal waiver in this case b ecause Tracy’s appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the r ecord shows the requisite knowledge and voluntariness, and enforcing the appeal waiver would not constitute a miscarriage of justice. SeeUnited States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (court should enforce appeal waiver and di smiss appeal where appeal falls within scope of waiver, both plea agreement and waiver were entered into knowingly and voluntarily, and no miscarriage of justice would result); see also United States v. Estrada-Bahena , 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case).
Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issue not covered by the waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we dismiss this appeal.

______________________________
# C_2022241EN.01000501.xml

| 24.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

23 June 2022

(2022/C 241/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0493 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 142,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4388 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85818 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7050 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0130 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,4750 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,750 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 399,60 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7085 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9468 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,2199 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5212 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3600 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2360 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6713 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4589 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 367,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,8170 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0367 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5286 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 594,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6230 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,440 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,261 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4515 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,0924 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,1489 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0493

JPY

Japanese yen

142,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4388

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85818

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7050

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0130

ISK

Iceland króna

139,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,4750

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,750

HUF

Hungarian forint

399,60

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7085

RON

Romanian leu

4,9468

TRY

Turkish lira

18,2199

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5212

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3600

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2360

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6713

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4589

KRW

South Korean won

1 367,21

ZAR

South African rand

16,8170

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0367

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5286

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 594,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6230

PHP

Philippine peso

57,440

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,261

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4515

MXN

Mexican peso

21,0924

INR

Indian rupee

82,1489

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3202 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 3202

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require that employers of 
 members of the National Guard and the reserve components of the Armed 
  Forces who are called to active duty continue to offer health care 
    coverage for dependents of such members, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 2003

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
  Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require that employers of 
 members of the National Guard and the reserve components of the Armed 
  Forces who are called to active duty continue to offer health care 
    coverage for dependents of such members, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reservist Health Care Continuity 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EMPLOYER HEALTH CARE COVERAGE FOR ENTIRE PERIOD OF 
              ABSENCE FOR DEPENDENTS OF NATIONAL GUARDSMEN AND 
              RESERVISTS CALLED TO ACTIVE DUTY.

    Section 4317(a)(1)(A) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(i) in the case of an employer with 20 
        or fewer employees'' after ``(A)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new clause:
            ``(ii) in the case of an employer with more than 20 
        employees, the period of such absence; or''.

SEC. 3. REQUIREMENT FOR GOVERNMENT REIMBURSEMENT FOR EMPLOYER SHARE OF 
              HEALTH CARE PREMIUMS.

    Section 4317(a) of such title is further amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
    ``(4) The Secretary of Defense shall reimburse an employer for the 
employer share of any premiums for health care coverage provided 
pursuant to this section to a person performing service in the 
uniformed services for each month during the period of such service.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 346.1 Purpose and scope of this part. ( a ) *General.* This part implements section 711 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (12 U.S.C. 1831y). That section requires any nongovernmental entity or person, insured depository institution, or affiliate of an insured depository institution that enters into a covered agreement to— ( 1 ) Make the covered agreement available to the public and the appropriate Federal banking agency; and
( 2 ) File an annual report with the appropriate Federal banking agency concerning the covered agreement.
( b ) *Scope of this part.* The provisions of this part apply to— ( 1 ) State nonmember insured banks;
( 2 ) Subsidiaries of state nonmember insured banks;
( 3 ) Nongovernmental entities or persons that enter into covered agreements with any company listed in paragraphs (b)(1), (2), (4) and (5) of this section.
( 4 ) State savings associations; and
( 5 ) Subsidiaries of State savings associations.
( c ) *Relation to Community Reinvestment Act.* This part does not affect in any way the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2901 *et seq.*) or the FDIC's Community Reinvestment regulation found at 12 CFR part 345, or the FDIC's interpretations or administration of that Act or regulation.
( d ) *Examples.* ( 1 ) The examples in this part are not exclusive. Compliance with an example, to the extent applicable, constitutes compliance with this part.
( 2 ) Examples in a paragraph illustrate only the issue described in the paragraph and do not illustrate any other issues that may arise in this part.