alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2962 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2962

   To prevent the abuse of the illegal drug commonly called ecstasy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2003

 Mr. Pascrell (for himself, Mr. Terry, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Etheridge, and 
 Mr. Capuano) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on 
  the Judiciary, and Education and the Workforce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prevent the abuse of the illegal drug commonly called ecstasy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ecstasy Awareness Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. PROFITING FROM RAVES.

     Section 416 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 856) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Whoever profits monetarily from a rave or similar electronic 
dance event, knowing or having reason to know that the unlawful use or 
distribution of a controlled substance occurs at the rave or similar 
event, shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned not more 
than 20 years, or both. If the defendant is an organization, the fine 
imposable for the offense is not more than $2,000,000.''.

SEC. 3. GRANTS FOR PROSECUTION OF ECSTASY OFFENSES.

    In addition to any other amounts authorized to be appropriated for 
such purpose, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney 
General $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2004 to make grants to provide 
training to State and local prosecutors and law enforcement agents for 
prosecution of ecstasy offenses.

SEC. 4. GRANTS FOR EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES TO PREVENT OR REDUCE THE USE 
              OF ECSTASY.

    Section 4115(b)(1) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 7115(b)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(E) include activities to prevent or reduce the 
                use of the illegal drug commonly called ecstasy.''.
                                 <all>
```
LTS Doc#:19823-2 Filed:01/18/22 Entered:01/19/22 15:46:48 Desc:

Envelope Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Transnational Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Paul L. Dailey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


/s/ Paul L. Dailey
------------------
Paul L. Dailey
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: December 15,2004

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
§ 390.288 Controlling person. The term *controlling person* of a State savings association means any person or entity which, either directly or indirectly, or acting in concert with one or more other persons or entities, owns, controls, or holds with power to vote, or holds proxies representing, ten percent or more of the voting shares or rights of such State savings association; or controls in any manner the election or appointment of a majority of the directors of such State savings association. However, a director of a State savings association will not be deemed to be a controlling person of such State savings association based upon his or her voting, or acting in concert with other directors in voting, proxies: ( a ) Obtained in connection with an annual solicitation of proxies, or
( b ) Obtained from savings account holders and borrowers if such proxies are voted as directed by a majority vote of the entire board of directors of such association, or of a committee of such directors if such committee's composition and authority are controlled by a majority vote of the entire board and if its authority is revocable by such a majority.
§ 348.3 Prohibitions. ( a ) *Community.* A management official of a depository organization may not serve at the same time as a management official of an unaffiliated depository organization if the depository organizations in question (or a depository institution affiliate thereof) have offices in the same community.
( b ) *RMSA.* A management official of a depository organization may not serve at the same time as a management official of an unaffiliated depository organization if the depository organizations in question (or a depository institution affiliate thereof) have offices in the same RMSA and each depository organization has total assets of $50 million or more.
( c ) *Major assets.* A management official of a depository organization with total assets exceeding $10 billion (or any affiliate of such an organization) may not serve at the same time as a management official of an unaffiliated depository organization with total assets exceeding $10 billion (or any affiliate of such an organization), regardless of the location of the two depository organizations. The FDIC will adjust these thresholds, as necessary, based on the year-to-year change in the average of the Consumer Price Index for the Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, not seasonally adjusted, with rounding to the nearest $100 million. The FDIC will announce the revised thresholds by publishing a final rule without notice and comment in the Federal Register.
[80 FR 79252, Dec. 21, 2015, as amended at 84 FR 54472, Oct. 10, 2019]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3208

To ensure that the travel and transportation allowances provided in connection 

with rest and recuperative leave granted to a member of the Armed 

Forces serving in Iraq or Afghanistan cover travel to and from the 

permanent duty station or home of record of the member, not simply 

to and from a port of entry in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2003

Mr. HENSARLING (for himself, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. PORTER, Mr. BARTLETT

of Maryland, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. 

VITTER, Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Ms. BORDALLO, and Mr. ROGERS of Alabama) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To ensure that the travel and transportation allowances provided in connection with rest and recuperative leave 

granted to a member of the Armed Forces serving in 

Iraq or Afghanistan cover travel to and from the permanent duty station or home of record of the member, 

not simply to and from a port of entry in the United 

States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3208 IH 

1 SECTION 1. TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION ALLOWANCES 

2 PROVIDED FOR REST AND RECUPERATIVE 

3 LEAVE IN CONNECTION WITH SERVICE IN OP4 ERATION IRAQI FREEDOM AND OPERATION 

5 ENDURING FREEDOM. 

6 (a) EXPANSION OF TRAVEL COVERED BY ALLOW7 ANCE.—In the case of a member of the Armed Forces 

8 serving outside of the United States in Operation Iraqi 

9 Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom who is granted 

10 rest and recuperative leave, and provided the travel and 

11 transportation allowances authorized by section 411c(a) of 

12 title 37, United States Code, in connection with that leave, 

13 the Secretary of Defense shall pay the member for trans14 portation or provide transportation for the member, not 

15 only between the overseas duty location and the locations 

16 specified in paragraph (1) or (2) of such section, but, at 

17 the request of the member, between the locations specified 

18 in such paragraphs and the permanent duty station or 

19 home of record of the member. 

20 (b) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—In the case of a 

21 member of the Armed Forces described in subsection (a) 

22 who received travel and transportation allowances under 

23 section 411c of title 37, United States Code, during the 

24 period beginning on September 20, 2003, and ending on 

25 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 

26 Defense shall reimburse the member for any transpor-
3

•HR 3208 IH 

1 tation costs incurred by the member before that date to 

2 procure transportation between the designated port of 

3 entry in the United States or the designated overseas loca4 tion under such section and the permanent duty station 

5 or home of record of the member.

Æ
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3130

To amend the Head Start Act to require parental consent for nonemergency 

intrusive physical examinations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2003

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself, Mr. PITTS, Mr. DEMINT, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, and 

Mr. BURGESS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Head Start Act to require parental consent 

for nonemergency intrusive physical examinations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HEAD START ACT AMENDMENT IMPOSING PA4 RENTAL CONSENT REQUIREMENT FOR NON5 EMERGENCY INTRUSIVE PHYSICAL EXAMINA6 TIONS. 

7 The Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9831 et seq.) is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following new section: 
2

•HR 3130 IH 

1 ‘‘SEC. 657A. PARENTAL CONSENT REQUIREMENT FOR NON2 EMERGENCY INTRUSIVE PHYSICAL EXAMINA3 TIONS. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—A Head Start agency shall ob5 tain written parental consent before administration of any 

6 nonemergency intrusive physical examination of a child in 

7 connection with participation in a program under this sub8 chapter. 

9 ‘‘(b) DEFINITION.—The term ‘nonemergency intru10 sive physical examination’ means, with respect to a child, 

11 a physical examination that—

12 ‘‘(1) is not immediately necessary to protect the 

13 health or safety of the child involved or the health 

14 or safety of another individual; and 

15 ‘‘(2) requires incision or is otherwise invasive, 

16 or involves exposure of private body parts’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Elcom International, Inc., aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-KSB”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, theperiods presented in the Form 10-KSB.          Dated: April 19, 2006 /s/ John E. Halnen      JohnE. Halnen    President and Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)       The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 andis not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
# !W-/¥
COA# 08-12-00295-CR OFFENSE: 21.11 Luke Stanton v. The State of 

# STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Denton COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM DATE: 10/10/14 TRIAL COURT: 211th District Court Publish: NO TC CASE#: F-2011-1913-C



## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS ELECTRONIC RECORD Luke Stanton v. The State of STYLE: Texas CCA#: 

### PRO SE Petition CCA Disposition: FOR DISCRETIONARY RFVIFWINCCAIS- DATF: ££/Vj,e1> JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH: 

# DATE: 07\0^l^0\r JUDGE: f,W (jAAAjtlr— PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: 

# 1
Memorandum

To United States Department of Energy

From Benjamin Longstreth, Natural Resources Defense Council

Date July 18, 2012

Re Ex Parte Communication

On Wednesday July 18, 2012, three energy efficien cy advocates met with representatives of the Department of Energy to discuss the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Energy Conservation Standards for Distribution Transformers, Do cket No. EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048, 77 Fed. Reg. 7282 (February 10, 2012). The efficiency advocates di scussed a number of flaws in the analysis published by the Department of Energy, including the techniques needed to achieve various efficiency levels and the evaluation of the efficiency levels at which transformers made with silicon steel and amorphous steel would be competitive.

The following individuals were present:

Kathleen Hogan, DOE John Cymbalsky, DOE Roland Risser, DOE Dan Cohen, DOE

Andrew DeLaski, Appliance Standards Awareness Project Steve Nadel of the American Council for an Energy Efficiency Economy Benjamin Longstreth, Natural Resources Defense Council

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Benjamin Longstreth Natural Resources Defense Council
United States Steel Corporation

– Keetac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request April 24, 2 012

**Item 5**
If not already

included in the Section 114 Information Request Response to be sent to EPA by April 18, 2010 [ sic ] , provide copies of all stack tests conducted on any emissions unit for any

reason, and include all test runs, even if a full test seri es was not completed. Identify

the emissions unit; specify the date of the test, test method used, and the filter temperature during the time of the test, if applicable. Provide all calculations relative to the stack test, and provide copies of the full te st report, including the section describing the process parameters and production or processing rates at the time of the test as well as copies of any reports of visible emission observations conducted during each test. For each test during which the sourc e was not operating at maximum design capacity , provide an explanation why production was not operating at maximum design capacity

. **Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or were consulted in the preparation**  **of the response:** Stephani Campbell

**Answer:**
As discussed during the conference call on April 12, 2012, the above

- request does not specificall y include an y time period and it would be overl y burdensome to provide all such stack tests for an undefined ti me period to the extent they are available. Therefore, during the call, U. S. EPA agreed to limit the request to available stack testing results for NO x and SO 2 tests conducted during the past seven y ears. Therefore, in response, two additional stack tes t reports were located that are included in our Section 114 Information Request Response dated April 24, 2012 that were not previously provided in our responses to the previous Informration Request. These two reports are included in the Item 5 Subfolder a s PDFs. The April 18, 2012 submittal contained all other non

- MACT and MACT sources tested. Those were appropriatel y identified with the submittal.
#### Larry Darnell MCCLENDON *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 73-68

496 S.W. 2d 428

Opinion delivered July 9, 1973

*Howard, Howard ir Howard,*for appellant.

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., by: *O. H. Hargraves,*Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant was charged by information with robbery involving the theft of a purse. The trial court, sitting as a jury, found him guilty of grand larceny. Of course, larceny is included in the crime of robbery. *Scifres*v. *State,*228 Ark. 486, 308 S.W. 2d 815 (1958). Afterwards the trial court heard testimony and determined appellant had committed two prior criminal offenses. Appellant was then sentenced to 10 years imprisonment in the state penitentiary. For reversal he contends, through his court appointed counsel, that the trial court erred in permitting the state to further examine the prosecuting witness as to the value of the stolen property after it had rested its case. We find no error.

After the state rested its case, the court allowed it to reopen and adduce, through the prosecuting witness, evidence that her purse and its contents approximated *903$75 in value or in excess of $35, thus placing the crime in the grand larceny category. The procedure was permissible. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-2114 (1964 Repl.) provides that the court may allow for good reason, in furtherance of justice, the parties to offer evidence upon the original case after having rested. “We have likewise so held numerous times, stating that it is within the trial court’s sound discretion and furtherance of justice, to permit the state to present witnesses after resting, where circumstances are such as to not prejudice defendant through surprise or otherwise when the disadvantage cannot be overcome.” *Rochester*v. *State,*250 Ark. 758, 467 S.W. 2d 182 (1971). See, also, *Bland*v. *State,*251 Ark. 23, 470 S.W. 2d 592 (1971), where we held that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in permitting the state to reopen its case to show the value of the property stolen exceeded $35. Appellant here recognizes that it is within the discretion of the trial court to permit a case to be reopened and additional evidence adduced. However, he asserts the court abused its discretion inasmuch as the additional testimony was a surprise and disadvantageous to him. It is difficult to perceive how the testimony complained of was a surprise or prejudicial when it could have been presented in the state’s original case. As previously indicated, larceny is included in the crime of robbery. Furthermore, upon the state’s initial proof, evidence was adduced that appellant admitted the purse contained approximately $36 in cash before dividing it with his two confederates. In these circumstances, finding no abuse of discretion or error prejudicial to appellant, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BACK YARD BURGERS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the Annual Report of Back Yard Burgers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Michael G. Webb
------------------------------------
Michael G. Webb
Chief Financial Officer
March 27, 2003
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000695 27-AUG-2015 07:48 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,616,418
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,249,542
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,991,250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,295,124
<PP&E>                                       2,842,654
<DEPRECIATION>                                 769,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,682,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,950,934
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        125
<COMMON>                                           530
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,609,838
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,682,585
<SALES>                                      5,868,156
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,868,156
<CGS>                                        2,887,655
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,904,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               573,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             210,476
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,708,604)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (100,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,608,604)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,608,604)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)
        

</TABLE>
#### §§ 410.152-410.159 [Reserved]
§ 390.304 Political subdivision. The term *political subdivision* includes any subdivision of a public unit, any principal department of such public unit: ( a ) The creation of which subdivision or department has been expressly authorized by state statute,
( b ) To which some functions of government have been delegated by state statute, and
( c ) To which funds have been allocated by statute or ordinance for its exclusive use and control. It also includes drainage, irrigation, navigation, improvement, levee, sanitary, school or power districts and bridge or port authorities and other special districts created by state statute or compacts between the states. Excluded from the term are subordinate or nonautonomous divisions, agencies or boards within principal departments.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3290

To amend the Food Stamp Act of 1977 to increase the amount payable 

to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to provide nutrition assistance 

under such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 15, 2003

Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA ́ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL

To amend the Food Stamp Act of 1977 to increase the 

amount payable to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 

to provide nutrition assistance under such Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Nutrition for 

5 American Citizens Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 3290 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

2 Section 19(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Food Stamp Act of 

3 1977 (7 U.S.C. 2028(a)(1)(A)(ii)) is amended by inserting 

4 ‘‘the sum of 2 percent and’’ after ‘‘adjusted by’’.

Æ