alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2022 Fiscal Transparency Report…Senegal

# 					2022 Fiscal Transparency Report: Senegal			

 In this section										

                -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Senegal 

## Government-by-Government Assessments: Senegal

During the review period, the government’s budget was widely and easily accessible to the public, including online.  The budget was substantially complete and generally reliable, except it did not include allocations to and earnings from major state-owned enterprises.  Information on debt obligations was generally available.  Although the government included debt of state-owned enterprises in its overall debt figures, information on the debt of individual, major state-owned enterprises was not publicly available.  The supreme audit institution, which met international standards of independence, did not publish audit reports within a reasonable period.  The government specified in law or regulation and appeared to follow in practice the criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction licenses and contracts.  Basic information on natural resource extraction awards was publicly available.

Senegal’s fiscal transparency would be improved by:

- Making debt obligations of major state-owned enterprises publicly available;
- Including in the budget financial allocations to and earnings from major state-owned enterprises; and
- Publishing audit reports within a reasonable period.

## View report by:

### On This Page

                    -  Government-by-Government Assessments: Senegal 

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for International Finance and DevelopmentSenegal

Back to Top

                - White House
                - USA.gov
                - Office of the Inspector General
                - Archives
                - Contact Us

follow us
FacebookXInstagramYouTubeFlickrGovDelivery

              - Privacy Policy
              - Accessibility Statement
              - Copyright Information
              - FOIA
              - No FEAR Act

## U.S. Department *of* State

#### The Lessons of 1989: Freedom and Our Future
# C_2020365EN.01000301.xml

| 29.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/3

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2020/C 365/03)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 9 July 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85366 |
| Decision No | 087/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Iceland |
| Title | COVI-19 Temporary media support scheme |
| Legal basis | Act No 37/2020 amending Media Act No 38/2011 and Regulation No 670/2020 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | The objective of the measure is to ease the operating burden of private media entities in Iceland and respond to the sectors temporary financial difficulties caused by COVID-19 |
| Budget | ISK 400 million |
| Duration | 9 July 2020 – 1 September 2020 |
| Economic sectors | Media sector |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry of Education, Science and Culture |
| Sölvhólsgata 4 |
| 101 Reykjavík |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

9 July 2020

Case No

85366

Decision No

087/20/COL

EFTA State

Iceland

Title

COVI-19 Temporary media support scheme

Legal basis

Act No 37/2020 amending Media Act No 38/2011 and Regulation No 670/2020

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

The objective of the measure is to ease the operating burden of private media entities in Iceland and respond to the sectors temporary financial difficulties caused by COVID-19

Budget

ISK 400 million

Duration

9 July 2020 – 1 September 2020

Economic sectors

Media sector

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry of Education, Science and Culture

Sölvhólsgata 4

101 Reykjavík

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/.

---
§ 329.109 Rules for consolidation. ( a ) *Consolidated subsidiary available stable funding amount.* For available stable funding of a legal entity that is a consolidated subsidiary of an FDIC-supervised institution, including a consolidated subsidiary organized under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction, the FDIC-supervised institution may include the available stable funding of the consolidated subsidiary in its ASF amount up to: ( 1 ) The RSF amount of the consolidated subsidiary, as calculated by the FDIC-supervised institution for the FDIC-supervised institution's net stable funding ratio under this part; plus
( 2 ) Any amount in excess of the RSF amount of the consolidated subsidiary, as calculated by the FDIC-supervised institution for the FDIC-supervised institution's net stable funding ratio under this part, to the extent the consolidated subsidiary may transfer assets to the top-tier FDIC-supervised institution, taking into account statutory, regulatory, contractual, or supervisory restrictions, such as sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 371c and 12 U.S.C. 371c-1) and Regulation W (12 CFR part 223).
( b ) *Required consolidation procedures.* To the extent an FDIC-supervised institution includes an ASF amount in excess of the RSF amount of the consolidated subsidiary, the FDIC-supervised institution must implement and maintain written procedures to identify and monitor applicable statutory, regulatory, contractual, supervisory, or other restrictions on transferring assets from any of its consolidated subsidiaries. These procedures must document which types of transactions the FDIC-supervised institution could use to transfer assets from a consolidated subsidiary to the FDIC-supervised institution and how these types of transactions comply with applicable statutory, regulatory, contractual, supervisory, or other restrictions.
42037.

#### ETHERIDGE v. WOODMEN OF THE WORLD LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY.

*Felton, C. J., Bell, P. J., Jordan, P. J., Hall, Eberhardt, Pannell, and Deen, JJ., concur. Quillian and Joslin, JJ., not participating.*

Decided May 19, 1967.

*Bloch, Hall, Groover & Hawkins, Denmark Groover, Jr., F. Kennedy Hall, Ellsworth Hall, III, George L. Jackson,*for appellant.

*Anderson, Walker & Reichert, Albert P. Reichert, Jr.,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The judgment of this court in 114 Ga. App. 807 (152 SE2d 773) having been reversed by the Supreme Court in *Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. Etheridge,*223 Ga. 231 (154 SE2d 369), the judgment of this court is vacated. As the judgment of this court must be conformed to the judgment of the Supreme Court, the judgment of the trial court is accordingly

*Affirmed.*
#### §§ 313.5-313.19 [Reserved]
§ 46.3 Applicability. ( a ) *Measurement of average total consolidated assets for a covered institution.* A covered institution's average total consolidated assets is calculated as the average of the covered institution's total consolidated assets, as reported on the covered institution's Call Reports, for the four most recent consecutive quarters. If the covered institution has not filed a Call Report for each of the four most recent consecutive quarters, the covered institution's average total consolidated assets is calculated as the average of the covered institution's total consolidated assets, as reported on the covered institution's Call Reports, for the most recent one or more consecutive quarters. The date on which a national bank or Federal savings association becomes a covered institution shall be the as-of date of the most recent Call Report used in the calculation of the average.
( b ) *Covered institutions that become subject to stress testing requirements.* A national bank or Federal savings association that becomes a covered institution shall conduct its first stress test under this part in the first reporting year that begins more than three calendar quarters after the date the national bank or Federal savings association becomes a covered institution, unless otherwise determined by the OCC in writing.
( c ) *Ceasing to be a covered institution or changing categories.* A covered institution shall remain subject to the stress test requirements until total consolidated assets of the covered institution falls below the relevant size threshold for each of four consecutive quarters as reported by the covered institution's most recent Call Reports, effective on the “as of” date of the fourth consecutive Call Report.
[77 FR 61246, Oct. 9, 2012, as amended at 79 FR 71633, Dec. 3, 2014; 83 FR 7953, Feb. 23, 2018; 84 FR 54476, Oct. 10, 2019]
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




February 21,
2001 


Certified Mail

Return Receipt Requested  



Kathy
Sweeny, Vice President

Brandywine Realty Trust

10,000 Midlantic Drive

Suite 300 West

Mount Laurel, NJ 08054 




Re: QAD, Inc.





Dear
Ms. Sweeny: 


    Our
firm is counsel to QAD, Inc. in connection with its lease at premises located at 10,000 Midlantic Drive, Suite 200, Mount Laurel, New Jersey (the "Lease"), as amended.
Pursuant to Exhibit E of said Lease, this letter shall constitute notice to Landlord that Tenant exercises its option to extend the terms of the Lease for an additional term of five
(5) years under the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit E. 


    I
note that the Fourth Amendment to the Lease, dated the 14th day of July, 1998, requires notices to be sent to Brandywine Realty Trust, Plaza 1000 at Main Street, Suite
400, Voorhees, New Jersey 08043, Attention: John M. Adderly, Jr., Senior Vice President. I have been informed that Brandywine no longer maintains an office at those premises, and that John Adderly is
no longer with your company. Accordingly, I am sending this notice, certified mail to you, at your current address. I ask that if this notice is deemed deficient in any way, that you contact me  immediately and I will send a copy of this notice to the address set forth in the Fourth Amendment to the Lease. 



    Upon
receipt of this letter, please contact me so that we may discuss the particulars of the extension and the coordination of the refurbishment of the leased premises. 



	 	 	Very truly yours,
	

 	
 	

FLASTER/GREENBERG P.C.
	

 	
 	

/s/ PETER R. SPIRGEL   
	

 	
 	

Peter R. Spirgel




PRS:jr 


	cc:
	John
Sarkasian

Michael Dale
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Eugene J. Pian, President and Chief Executive Officer of SETO Holdings,
Inc., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on
for 10-QSB of SETO Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respects to
the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have;  a.
    
    designed such disclosure
controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of
the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures
as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); andc.
    
    presented in this quarterly
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officers
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of
Registrants board of directors (or person performing the
equivalent functions):  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies in
the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the Registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the Registrants auditors and
material weaknesses in internal controls; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants
internal controls; and  6.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officers
and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there
were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: September 13, 2004/s/ Eugene J. PianEugene J. Pian
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2912

To reaffirm the inherent sovereign rights of the Osage Tribe to determine 

its membership and form of government. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2003

Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To reaffirm the inherent sovereign rights of the Osage Tribe 

to determine its membership and form of government.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REAFFIRMATION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS OF THE 

4 OSAGE TRIBE. 

5 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds as follows: 

6 (1) The Osage Tribe is a federally recognized 

7 tribe based in Pawhuska, Oklahoma. 

8 (2) The Osage Allotment Act of June 28, 1906 

9 (34 Stat. 539) states that the ‘‘legal membership’’ 

10 of the Osage Tribe includes the persons on the Jan-
2

•HR 2912 IH 

1 uary 1, 1906 roll and their children, and that each 

2 ‘‘member’’ on that roll is entitled to a headright 

3 share in the distribution of funds from the Osage 

4 mineral estate and an allotment of the surface lands 

5 of the Osage Reservation. 

6 (3) Today only Osage Indians who have a 

7 headright share in the mineral estate are ‘‘mem8 bers’’ of the Osage Tribe. 

9 (4) Adult Osage Indians without a headright in10 terest cannot vote in Osage government elections 

11 and are not eligible to seek elective office in the 

12 Osage Tribe as a matter of Federal law. 

13 (5) A principal goal of Federal Indian policy is 

14 to promote tribal self-sufficiency and strong tribal 

15 government. 

16 (b) REAFFIRMATION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS OF THE

17 OSAGE TRIBE.—

18 (1) MEMBERSHIP.—Congress hereby clarifies 

19 that the term ‘‘legal membership’’ in section 1 of the 

20 Act entitled, ‘‘An Act For the division of lands and 

21 funds of the Osage Indians in Oklahoma Territory, 

22 and for other purposes’’, approved June 28, 1906 

23 (34 Stat. 539), means the persons eligible for allot24 ments of Osage Reservation lands and a pro rata 

25 share of the Osage mineral estate as provided in 
3

•HR 2912 IH 

1 that Act, not membership in the Osage Tribe for all 

2 purposes. Congress hereby reaffirms the inherent 

3 sovereign right of the Osage Tribe to determine its 

4 own membership, provided that the rights of any 

5 person to Osage mineral estate shares are not dimin6 ished thereby. 

7 (2) GOVERNMENT.—Notwithstanding section 9 

8 of the Act entitled, ‘‘An Act For the division of 

9 lands and funds of the Osage Indians in Oklahoma 

10 Territory, and for other purposes’’, approved June 

11 28, 1906 (34 Stat. 539), Congress hereby reaffirms 

12 the inherent sovereign right of the Osage Tribe to 

13 determine its own form of government. 

14 (3) ELECTIONS AND REFERENDA.—At the re15 quest of the Osage Tribe, the Secretary of the Inte16 rior shall assist the Osage Tribe with conducting 

17 elections and referenda to implement this section.

Æ
# C_2023137EN.01000301.xml

| 20.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/3

---

No state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

(2023/C 137/03)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 15 December 2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Cases No | 86109 and 87198 |
| Decision No | 231/22/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Temporary amendments to the PTA |
| Legal basis | Act of 19 June 2020 on amendments to the Act on Petroleum Tax |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | |
| Form of aid | No aid |
| Budget | |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | |
| Economic sectors | Extraction of crude petroleum and natural gas |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry of Petroleum and Energy |
| P.O. Box 8148 Dep |
| NO-0033 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

15 December 2022

Cases No

86109 and 87198

Decision No

231/22/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Region

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Temporary amendments to the PTA

Legal basis

Act of 19 June 2020 on amendments to the Act on Petroleum Tax

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Form of aid

No aid

Budget

Intensity

Duration

Economic sectors

Extraction of crude petroleum and natural gas

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry of Petroleum and Energy

P.O. Box 8148 Dep

NO-0033 Oslo

NORWAY

Other information

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
§ 50.1 Purpose and applicability. ( a ) *Purpose.* This part establishes a minimum liquidity standard and a minimum stable funding standard for certain national banks and Federal savings associations on a consolidated basis, as set forth herein.
( b ) *Applicability.* ( 1 ) A national bank or Federal savings association is subject to the minimum liquidity standard, minimum stable funding standard, and other requirements of this part if: ( i ) It is a: ( A ) GSIB depository institution supervised by the OCC;
( B ) Category II national bank or Federal savings association; or
( C ) Category III national bank or Federal savings association; or
( ii ) The OCC has determined that application of this part is appropriate in light of the national bank's or Federal savings association's asset size, level of complexity, risk profile, scope of operations, affiliation with foreign or domestic covered entities, or risk to the financial system.
( 2 ) This part does not apply to: ( i ) A bridge financial company as defined in 12 U.S.C. 5381(a)(3), or a subsidiary of a bridge financial company;
( ii ) A new depository institution or a bridge depository institution, as defined in 12 U.S.C. 1813(i); or
( iii ) A Federal branch or agency as defined by 12 CFR 28.11.
( 3 ) In making a determination under paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, the OCC will apply notice and response procedures in the same manner and to the same extent as the notice and response procedures in 12 CFR 3.404.
[84 FR 59266, Nov. 1, 2019, as amended at 86 FR 9207, Feb. 11, 2021]
In The Matter Of: 

### ·SERVED: April 6, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

## OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

SkyWest Airlines, Inc. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2014-0322 Case No. 2012NM060030 Respondent

' 

### ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. FAA-2014-0686 Case No. 2014WP910006 Docket No. FAA-2014-0809 Case No. 2012NM060029 Docket No. FAA-2014-0810 Case No. 2012NM060123 Docket No. FAA-2014-0811 Case No. 2013NM060083 Docket No. FAA-2016-4267 Case No. 2015WP91 0079

.ORDERGRANTING IN PART PARTIES' JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
On March 31, 2016, in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 13.218(a), the parties tiled a Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings as they continue to negotiate a possible settlement in six related
cases. The parties note that, due to the complexity ofthe issues involved, the negotiation ofa global settlement is "expected to last some time."' Under the Rules governing these proceedings, the parties are encouraged to consider the possibility ofsettlement and compromise. Itis not, however, in the best interests ofthe**part~es** or the public to allowa case to stop orderly proceedings indefinitely for such discussions once a

1Parties' Joint Mot. to Stay Proceedings at I.request for hearing has been s'ubmitted.2 Therefore, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.205(a)(8), 

### it is hereby ORDERED: 1. The parties'joint motion to stay proceedings is granted for a period of60 days. 

### 2. The parties must submit ajoint report stating the progress ofthe global settlement negotiations, including an indication ofhow much additional time, ifany, the negotiations require, 

### no later than June 6, 2016.

### ~_L 

# __**~1SKE** RAWALD ----._. Administrative LawJudge
Attachment: Service List

2 See Rules ofPractice for FAA Civil Penalty Actions, 55 Fed. Reg. 27548,27554 (Jul. 3, 1990) (''The FAA does recognize, however, that <;ompliance and enforcement objectives are enhanced when enforcement actions are ... adjudicated expeditiously.''). 

### 2

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591
. Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WHbur Wright Building-Suite2WIOOQ3

Todd Emerson,·Respondent 's Counsel SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 444 S. River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 

### ONE COPY

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration ·Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7

1601 Lind Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-2161 FAX: 425:227-1007 The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (El1-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0686 (Civil 

### Penalty Action)

· 3 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or 

### by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.