alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Fw: Avenal Power Plant Julie Walters to: Shirley Rivera 03/02/2011 03:43 PM Cc: Amy Parsley, Andrew Chew Shirley, As discussed, the author of this Sierra Club letter should be added to the "C list" and receive this week's public notice. Thanks, Julie

********************************************************** Julie Walters Assistant Regional Counsel USEPA, Region 9 75 Hawthorne St., Mail Code ORC-2 San Francisco, CA 94105 Email: walters. j ulie@epa.gov Direct Dial: 415-972-3892 Fax: 415-947-3570

*********************************************************** ----- Forwarded by Julie Walters/ R9/USEPA/US on 03/02/2011 03:40 PM -----

From: Travis Ritchie <Travis.Ritchie@sierraclub.org> To: Gina McCarthy/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, stephanie.talbert@usdoj.gov, Brian Doster/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Ju lie Walters/R9/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Pat Gallagher <Pat.Gallagher@sierraclub.org>, Bruce Nilles <Bruce.Nilles@sierraclub.org>, Gloria Smith <Gloria.Smith@sierraclub.org> Date: 02/25/2011 08:44 PM Subject: Avenal Power Plant
Please find the attached correspondence from the Si erra Club regarding the Avenal Power Plant in California. Travis Ritchie Associate Attorney Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 85 Second St., 2nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 travis.ritchie@sierraclub.org

Tel: 415-977-5727
<PAGE>   1


                                SUMMA FOUR, INC.
<TABLE>

                                   EXHIBIT 11
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<CAPTION>

 
                                                    1997       1996        1995
                                                    ----       ----        ----
<S>                                               <C>         <C>         <C>   
Primary

Average shares outstanding of
Common Stock                                       5,951       6,175       6,195

Net effect of dilutive stock options -
based on the treasury stock method                   166         213         377
                                                  ------      ------      ------
     Total                                         6,117       6,388       6,572
                                                  ======      ======      ======

Net income                                        $1,848      $3,765      $5,423

Per share amount                                  $  .30      $  .59      $  .82
                                                  ======      ======      ======


<CAPTION>

                                                   1997       1996         1995
                                                   ----       ----         ----
<S>                                               <C>         <C>         <C>   
Fully Diluted

Average shares outstanding of
Common Stock                                       5,951       6,175       6,195

Net effect of dilutive stock options -
based on the treasury stock method                   170         225         391
                                                  ------      ------      ------
     Total                                         6,121       6,400       6,586
                                                  ======      ======      ======

Net income                                        $1,848      $3,765      $5,423

Per share amount                                  $  .30      $  .59      $  .82
                                                  ======      ======      ======
</TABLE>


                                       39
FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

December 18, 2015

ABELACOSTA, CLERK

6l^A/0.-f

PD 0793-15

^/•ruFte "j^p^y

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

MITCHELL DEAN COCHRAN

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

PD-0793-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 12/18/2015 4:08:46 PM

Accepted 12/19/2015 11:36:13 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

MOTION FOR REHEARING

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

I.

COMES NOW, Appellant in the above styled case, and makes and

files this his request for an extension oftime to file his motion to extend time

to file a motion for rehearing and would show unto the Court the following:

COURT BELOW:

CAUSE NUMBER BELOW:

DATE FOR PETITION OF

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW REFUSED:

PRESENT DEADLINE FOR

FILING APPELLANTS' PDR:

Mitchel Dean Cochran

Tenth Court of Appeals

NO. 10-14-00013-CR

12-9-15

12-25-15
DAYS REQUESTED BY THIS

EXTENSION: 20 days from the date

motion is due (1-14-16)

DATE TO WHICH EXTENSION

IS REQUESTED: 1-13-16

NUMBER OF EXTENSIONS

PREVIOUSLY GRANTED: None

I.

The Appellee's request is based upon the following reasonable

explanation of the need for additional time, within the personal knowledge

of Charles W. McDonald, the attorney signing this motion, T.R.A.P. 10.5(b),

namely:

II.

Due to the upcoming holidays, Counsel is scheduled to be out of the

office until January 4, 2016 and requests an extension to January 14, 2016.

III.

WHEREFORE, this Attorney for the Appellant prays that the Court

grant this motion and extend the time and deadline for the filing of

Appellant's motion for rehearing, or the Court grant such additional time as

is just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Charles W. McDonald

Charles W. McDonald

ATTORNEY AT LAW

2024 Austin Avenue

Waco, Texas 76701

(254) 752-9901

FAX: (254) 754-1466

SBOTNO. 13538800

Mitchel Dean Cochran
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of this

brief was served electronically on December 18, 2015 to: (1) counsel

for the State, Sterling Harmon, sterkng.harmon@co.mclennan.tx.us;

and (2) the State Prosecuting Attorney, lisa.mcminn@SPA.texas.gov.

IslCharles W. McDonald

Charles W. McDonald

Mitchel Dean Cochran
From: To: Subj e ct : Date: D u ncan , J eff E AS CO ST) Gre at Lake s Air l i n e s T hurs d ay , A ug u st 22 , 201 3 5 :5 9:4 1 PM



### I am writing this email in support of Great Lakes Airlines ' proposal for three ( 3 ) d ai ly roundt ri p flights between Vernal and Denver.

Reg ards , Jeff Duncan A n ad a rko M idst re am Produ ctio n S u p e rint end e n t PO 9 7 0 ( 1176 E ast , 15 00 S ou th ) Ve r n a l , Utah 84078 C 43 5. 828 , 6402 04 3 5 , 781 , 7030

Cl i ck h e re fo r A n ad arko's El e ct ro ni c Ma i l D isc l ai m er 

### ~

. . .. , . . '

'

- > ' ~
--Et? 

E&zFfij*.., . 

T. r. -, - ,**m*.*m 

P ar q . M -v. JR. 

Pm1 -u 

2. w. WSAVY 

-..-D 

W.& m 

I-- 

TOM Lr o wm* 

OFFICE OF THE All-ORNEY GENERAL c- mnT* *vIo) Y. - JOCSIMIU 

AUSTIN DIQ smlm 

SAIL- mumvm -*Twu 

-C.“-* 

s?msIIuoH-w- 

- WAISQ 

-..ww. L wtu.lmumm 

January 6, 1999 

Hon. Harry w. nmge 

Distrlot Attorney 

Cataatille, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

on as to whether 

Court hfia authority 

advised that it iu 

t the Ceunty Wmbui1.d 

vised Civil Statutiia O? 

.k~ttar, and Article 

totes whfak artiolse refer 

4hxui8llo~*r‘~ Oourt to 

use the plural 

wo deem it aet forth these artiolea at lengtk, 
4.3 

Hon. &rry W. Flentge, January 6, 1959, Pa&a 2 

. 

and a oopg of same Is enolosad herewith. 

Yours rei3peotfully . 

-ATTORNEY CENERAL OF TEXAS 

Assistant 

WJF:AW 

ENCLOBURE 

A'I!TORWEYGEWERAL OFTEXAS
#### § 362.14 Purpose and scope.

This subpart implements section 18(m) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1828(m)) which requires that prior notice be given the FDIC when an insured savings association establishes or acquires a subsidiary or engages in any new activity in a subsidiary. For the purposes of this subpart, the term “subsidiary” does not include any insured depository institution as that term is defined in the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. Unless otherwise indicated, the definitions provided in § 362.2 apply to this subpart.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

          - [OMB Control No. 3206-0034; RI 30-2]

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for review of a revised information collection. This information collection, “Annuitant's Report of Earned Income” (OMB Control No. 3206-0034; Form RI 30-2), is used annually to determine if disability retirees under age 60 have earned income which will result in the termination of their annuity benefits.

We estimate 21,000 RI 30-2 forms are completed annually. The RI 30-2 takes approximately 35 minutes to complete for an annual burden of 12,250 hours.

                        For copies of this proposal, contact Cyrus S. Benson by telephone (202) 606-4808, FAX (202) 606-0623 or by E-mail to                         *Cyrus.Benson@opm.gov.*                         Please include a mailing address with your request.                    

# DATES:

Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar days from the date of this publication.

# ADDRESSES:

Send or deliver comments to—

James K. Freiert, Deputy Assistant Director, Retirement Services Program, Center for Retirement and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC 20415-3500, and

OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

*For information regarding administrative coordination contact:*                         Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RIS Support Services/Support Group, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 4H28, Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-0623.                     

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

John Berry,

Director.

[FR Doc. E9-24847 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325-38-P
42748.

#### LIBERTY LOAN & THRIFT CORPORATION v. COCHRAN et al.

Joslin, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the court below sustaining the general and special demurrers to the plaintiff’s amended petition, and dismissing the petition.

The petition, as amended, alleges that the co-defendants, jointly and severally, are indebted to the petitioner on a note which they had made payable to one Glenn H. Copeland, and that the said Glenn H. Copeland had transferred the note to the Liberty Loan & Thrift Corporation, petitioner. The amended petition further alleges that a note was made by the co-defendants, James M. Cochran and William J. Collins, payable to the said Glenn H. Copeland, and that the said Glenn *722H. Copeland had business with the Liberty Loan & Thrift Corporation, petitioner, which may have resulted in the transfer of the note to the Liberty Loan & Thrift Corporation.

*Bell, P. J., concurs. Pannell, J., concurs in the judgment.*

Submitted May 1, 1967

Decided May 10, 1967.

Action on note. Fulton Civil Court. Before Judge Langford. *Olon E. Scott,*for appellant.

*Wall, Armstrong & Fuller, Hilton M. Fuller,*for appellees.

It is clear then that a cause of action has been stated and that the order sustaining the general demurrers should be reversed.

As to the three special demurrers, the following decisions are rendered. The special demurrer on the grounds that Paragraph I of the plaintiff’s petition, as amended, is unintelligible and the defendants are unable to properly prepare their defense is clearly not sustainable. As a cause of action is therein alleged with sufficient clarity, the order sustaining this special demurrer was error.

The special demurrer to Exhibit B on the grounds that the same is illegible and cannot be read by the defendants or their counsel, and defendants are unable to properly prepare their defense to the plaintiff’s claim, is not supportable. Exhibit B is entitled a note—loan statement—bill of sale, and although it has the usual, myriad provisions, it clearly states the allegations intended. The order sustaining this special demurrer, then, was error.

The special demurrer to Paragraph I of the amended petition alleging that nowhere in said paragraph or elsewhere in the petition does plaintiff set forth in what manner the figures set forth in said paragraph are arrived at, and the defendants are unable to properly prepare their defense to the plaintiff’s claim, is not sustainable in that the petition does allege the making of the note and the original amount due thereunder, and that there was an assignment transaction. The fact of the exact amount left to be paid on said note should be left to be developed in the trial. The order sustaining this special demurrer, therefore, was error. The order of the lower court in this case sustaining each and every demurrer interposed in the above case and dismissing the petition must be reversed.

*Judgment reversed.*
OFFICEOFTHEA-ITORNEY GENERAL
AUSTIN

Er. i"isrrenKoDoncld County Attornay Saltrl county Tyler, Texas Dear Yr. MoDonnld: January

190.C-1034) ity of ?a Colleoaccept payment 0T nent taxes without ent of school androe4 res that wnre Aelinquent ars prior to the datr. it wneffled. he following question

llnquent contraot

, does a County for oomnonnnd he authorIt to ant of delinquent taxes wlthout the 01 androad taxes that are delinquent t.owSh Late the suit wn8filed?" to ycur quejtlon you are respectfully adour oyinlon where a tar contract ie in prooess and tax suits are flled, a oolleotor mayaccept the papment of dtllnquent taxes without the payment of school and rosd taxes that are delinquent ten yews prior to the data the suit was riled. However, Rtax collcator could not clre the tu payer s clear reaelpt, or a stateaent that all taxes had **heon** paid.

.,

Mr. Karren KoDonald, January 18, 1939, Page 2.

Thereoolpt would merely showthe amountof taxes paid andthe years rorwhloh paid, and the school androad tax would at111 be due andunpaid,

krtlole 7298, Revised Civil Statute $rovlder in part as to11ows:

“

. . . . . provided, that no suit shell be brought for the oolleotlon of delinquent taxes of a School Die**triot** or **Road** Dletrlct unless instituted within ‘ten years Sromthe time the sameshall beoome delinquent.” It la our opinion that this provlelon i.nArticle 7298 la a ton year statute of limitation on oolleotlon of delinquent taxem due a.school distrlot or a road district. In order to **take** advantage of-the limitation period th4 tax paper would have to speolally plead and set up his right6 under this ton year statute. In the absence of such special plesdlng by the tax payer, the attorney brlnglng the tex suit, could take **judgment** iOr the sohool and road tat, delinquent ten years prior to the date the suit was filed even though the other taxes had been paid. Yours very truly ATTORNEY

GENERAL

OFTZXAS

COB:CFS AYFRGVED:

ATTORNEY

OEN-ERAL

GFTEXAS $,J

f ’$
To: Greg Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Wozniak, Russell (RA)" <wozniara@dow.com> Date: 07/15/2008 05:53PM cc: "Lincoln, Danielle (D)" <dlincoln@dow.com> Subject: HAP Emissions Information for Dow PVC MACT Submittal Greg, Please find attached process and HAP emissions information for our two PVC manufacturing processes in the US. We formatted our information in a similar fashion to the VI submittal sent to EPA in late June. The attachment contains process descriptions and flow diagrams along with tables that contain HAP emissions information. We ask that you please consider these data in conjuction with the data submitted by the VI as you continue with the re-development of the PVC MACT rule. Please note that the process description for our "Suspension Process" is not included at this time, but we did not want to delay submittal of the bulk of the information. We will send this process description to you at later date to complete the file. Danielle Lincoln of Dow's Operations Regulatory Management group worked with our two sites to prepare this information. Please feel free to forward any questions you have to me or to Danielle at 979-238-2346. Regards,

Russell A. Wozniak The Dow Chemical Company EH&S Operations Regulatory Management Office 361-553-2920 Mobile 361-649-2249 -----Original Message----- From: Nizich.Greg@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Nizich.Greg@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:51 AM To: Wozniak, Russell (RA) Subject: Re: Dow PVC MACT Submittal: Update to EPA Hi Russell, July 11, or thereabouts, will be fine. We should have no problem evaluating all the data together. Thanks for the update.Greg.

(See attached file: PVC MACT 2008-07-15.doc)