alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
                        CERTIFICATION

I, Greg Amato, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Epolin, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

          (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

          (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control
over financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

          (a)  All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely
affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

          (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting.



Dated: January 14, 2008          By:  /s/ Greg Amato
                                      Greg Amato,
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)
#### WIMBISH, Gdn., v. DIXON, Adm’r.

No. 31376.

Oct. 12, 1943.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 23, 1943.

Application for Leave to File Second Petition for Rehearing Denied Dec. 21, 1943.

*143 P. 2d 616.*

Robert Wimbish, of Ada, for plaintiff in error.

Hobert G. Orton, of Ada, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

On December 18, 1940, Robert J. Wimbish, as guardian of Sarah Cagle, an incompetent, filed in the county court of Pontotoc county, Okla., his final report as such guardian and the county court made the order settling the guardian’s account, after which on April 14, 1942, the said Robert J. Wimbish filed in said proceeding a motion asking to set aside and hold for naught the order formerly made and sought approval of the final report and the al*551lowance of guardian’s fees and attorney fees. All of this proceeding was concluded in the county court on the 5th day of May, 1942, and on the 12th day of May, 1942, the guardian filed his notice of appeal and the appeal was lodged in the district court of Pontotoc county.

On the 22nd day of July, 1942, the district court of Pontotoc county rendered judgment in said county settling the guardian’s account on the same basis and figures as in the county court order of September 26, 1941, and therein allowed said guardian fees and attorney fees.

Robert J. Wimbish as guardian did not appeal from the order entered by the district court on the 22nd day of July, 1942, but filed a motion for new trial on July 23, 1942. This motion was passed on by the district court and overruled on October 7, 1942, and this appeal is prosecuted from the order overruling the motion for new trial.

The petition in error was filed on April 2, 1943, more than eight months after the judgment of the trial court entered July 22, 1942. A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the filing and determination of motion for new trial is unnecessary. The appeal must be dismissed. Butler v. Archard, 130 Okla. 241, 266 P. 1106; Lewis v. McQueen,- 188 Okla. 157, 107 P. 2d 192. See Butler v. Archard, supra.

The appeal is dismissed.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. OSBORN and WELCH, JJ., absent. DAVISON, J., not participating.
### STRAUB SURVEYING MONTHLY MAINTENANCE LOG Month:________________Year:__________

Other: Landing Gear Vibration Dampening Propellers Camera Gimbal Airframe Engines UAS: __________ Date Issue Discovered Date Issue Addressed Issue Description & Maintenance Conducted Maintenance Performed By: Print & Sign Software Updates
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SETO Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
on form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig
Pian, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



| | 3. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 4. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: September 10, 2003

|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/  Craig Pian
Craig Pian
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this quarterly report on form 10-QSB pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by
the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

28
# Euroopan unionin C 402I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 402I |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 64. vuosikerta5. lokakuuta 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 402I

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

64. vuosikerta5. lokakuuta 2021

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Tiedotteet |
| | EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET |
| | Tilintarkastustuomioistuin |
| 2021/C 402 I/01 | Lausunto nro 2/2021 komission ehdotuksesta neuvoston asetukseksi asetuksen (EU, Euratom) N:o 609/2014 muuttamisesta ennustettavuuden lisäämiseksi jäsenvaltioiden kannalta ja riitojenratkaisumenettelyjen selkeyttämiseksi perinteisten ja ALV- ja BKTL-perusteisten omien varojen käyttöön asettamisen yhteydessä (COM(2021) 327 final, 25. kesäkuuta 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE)) | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

IV   Tiedotteet

EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET

Tilintarkastustuomioistuin

2021/C 402 I/01

Lausunto nro 2/2021 komission ehdotuksesta neuvoston asetukseksi asetuksen (EU, Euratom) N:o 609/2014 muuttamisesta ennustettavuuden lisäämiseksi jäsenvaltioiden kannalta ja riitojenratkaisumenettelyjen selkeyttämiseksi perinteisten ja ALV- ja BKTL-perusteisten omien varojen käyttöön asettamisen yhteydessä (COM(2021) 327 final, 25. kesäkuuta 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE))

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

IV Tiedotteet

EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET

Tilintarkastustuomioistuin

| 5.10.2021 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CI 402/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2021

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CI 402/1

---

Lausunto nro 2/2021

komission ehdotuksesta neuvoston asetukseksi asetuksen (EU, Euratom) N:o 609/2014 muuttamisesta ennustettavuuden lisäämiseksi jäsenvaltioiden kannalta ja riitojenratkaisumenettelyjen selkeyttämiseksi perinteisten ja ALV- ja BKTL-perusteisten omien varojen käyttöön asettamisen yhteydessä (COM(2021) 327 final, 25. kesäkuuta 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE))

(2021/C 402 I/01)

Euroopan tilintarkastustuomioistuin tiedottaa, että lausunto nro 2/2021 komission ehdotuksesta neuvoston asetukseksi asetuksen (EU, Euratom) N:o 609/2014 muuttamisesta ennustettavuuden lisäämiseksi jäsenvaltioiden kannalta ja riitojenratkaisumenettelyjen selkeyttämiseksi perinteisten ja ALV- ja BKTL-perusteisten omien varojen käyttöön asettamisen yhteydessä (COM(2021) 327 final, 25. kesäkuuta 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE)) julkaistaan 5 päivänä lokakuuta 2021.

Kertomus on luettavissa ja ladattavissa Euroopan tilintarkastustuomioistuimen internet-sivustolla 5 päivästä lokakuuta 2021 klo 17.00 alkaen:

https://www.eca.europa.eu/fi/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=59435

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

AMO ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A

VISTA CENTRAL MARKET,

Appellant,

v.

JULIAN GARCIA MONTANEZ,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00092

- CV

Appeal from

346th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2011

- DCV

- 02041)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on Appellant = s unopposed motion to dismiss and

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed, in accordance with

the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellant to pay

all costs of this appeal. We further order that this decision be certified below for observa nce.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–571

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2328, THE

CLEAN LAKES PROGRAM

APRIL 11, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 468]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 468, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 2328, the

Clean Lakes Program, under an open rule. The rule provides one

hour of general debate divided equally between the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and

Infrastructure.

The rule makes in order the Committee on Transportation and

Infrastructure amendment in the nature of a substitute, now printed in the bill, as an original bill for the purpose of amendment. The

rule also waives clause 7 of rule XVI (prohibiting nongermane

amendments) against the committee amendment in the nature of

a substitute. The rule further provides that the amendment in the

nature of a substitute shall be open for amendment by section.

Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record prior to their consideration will be given priority in

recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise consistent with

House rules. The rule allows the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole to postpone votes during consideration of the bill and to reduce voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if the vote

follows a fifteen minute vote. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, with or without instructions.

The waiver of clause 7 of rule XVI (prohibiting nongermane

amendments) against the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure amendment in the nature of substitute is necessary beVerDate 20-MAR-2000 02:43 Apr 12, 2000 Jkt 079008 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR571.XXX pfrm03 PsN: HR571
2

cause the substitute adds Otsego Lake in New York, Oneida Lake

in New York, Raystown Lake in Pennsylvania, and Swan Lake in

Itasca County, Minnesota to the Clean Lakes Program and these

lakes were not included in the original bill.

Æ
42273.

#### CARMACK v. OGLETHORPE COMPANY.

*Frankum and Pannell, JJ., concur.*

Decided March 10, 1967.

*E. T. Hendon, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Spearman, Bynum & Goodwin, W. L. Spearman, B. Hugh Burgess,*for appellee.

Felton, Chief Judge.

The judgment of this court denying the motion to dismiss the appeal was reversed, by the Supreme Court in *Oglethorpe Company v. Carmack,*223 Ga. 128 (153 SE2d 541). The judgment of this court denying the motion to dismiss the appeal is vacated, and the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

*Appeal dismissed.*
§ 308.522 Subpoenas for attendance at hearing. ( a ) A party wishing to procure the appearance and testimony of any individual at the hearing may request that the ALJ issue a subpoena.
( b ) A subpoena requiring the attendance and testimony of an individual may also require the individual to produce documents at the hearing.
( c ) A party seeking a subpoena must file a written request not less than 15 days before the date fixed for the hearing unless otherwise allowed by the ALJ for good cause shown. Such request must specify any documents to be produced and must designate the witnesses and describe the address and location thereof with sufficient particularity to permit such witnesses to be found.
( d ) The subpoena must specify the time, date, and place at which the witness is to appear and any documents the witness is to produce.
( e ) The party seeking the subpoena must serve it in the manner prescribed in § 308.507 of this subpart. A subpoena on a party or upon an individual under the control of a party may be served by first class mail.
( f ) A party or the individual to whom the subpoena is directed may file with the ALJ a motion to quash the subpoena within 10 days after service or on or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance if it is less than 10 days after service.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 07/27 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
# C_2023123EN.01000701.xml

| 5.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/7

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2023/C 123/07)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Germany

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Germany

Subject of commemoration: The 1275th anniversary of the birth of Charlemagne (748–814), King of the Franks and Holy Roman Emperor

Description of the design: The design combines two contemporary elements: Charlemagne’s personal monogram and the octagon of Aachen Cathedral. The two motifs are deftly merged into a distinctive work of art. The strength of the design lies in its dynamic, three-dimensional quality. Overall, it is an innovative tribute to an outstanding figure in European history. The coin’s inner ring also features the inscription ‘KARL DER GROßE’ (‘Charlemagne’) at the top and, in the bottom half, the year of issue ‘2023’, the dates ‘748–814’, Germany’s issuing country code ‘D’, the mint mark of the respective mint (‘A’, ‘D’, ‘F’, ‘G’ or ‘J’) and the artist’s initials (‘TW’).

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 20 000 000

Date of issue: March 2023

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
§ 323.8 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* This subpart is issued pursuant to12 U.S.C. 1818, 1819 [“Seventh” and “Tenth”] and Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA), as amended by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) (Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010)), 12 U.S.C. 3331 *et seq.*
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this subpart is to implement sections 1109, 1117, 1121, and 1124 of FIRREA Title XI, 12 U.S.C. 3338, 3346, 3350, and 3353.
( c ) *Scope.* This subpart applies to States and to appraisal management companies (AMCs) providing appraisal management services in connection with consumer credit transactions secured by a consumer's principal dwelling or securitizations of those transactions.
( d ) *Rule of construction.* Nothing in this subpart should be construed to prevent a State from establishing requirements in addition to those in this subpart. In addition, nothing in this subpart should be construed to alter guidance in, and applicability of, the Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines[1] or other relevant agency guidance that cautions banks, bank holding companies, Federal savings associations, state savings association, and credit unions, as applicable, that each such entity is accountable for overseeing the activities of third-party service providers and ensuring that any services provided by a third party comply with applicable laws, regulations, and supervisory guidance applicable directly to the financial institution.
Footnotes -
323.8
[1] *https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/5000-4800.html .*
### Regulatory );valuation

Docket No. FAA-2015-2208 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NE-19-AD-AD 

### Add tlre war/r hom ~a~ 

### , ynrts cosl, emd nuntber of U S 

### segis(ered pr

~ 

### oducts !o !he lable Gelow. When pou are ,Ji»ished click on Ihe "Opda[eTields" Ga[lon 7o rrutontalical7y jill in [he /o/als. Update Fields
Estimated Costs: 

### Actiou (e.g., Inspectioq replacemeut)

### Do not rnelude oncondition eosis here 

### Costs per Product (e.g, aireraft, engine,

ro eller, a liauoe)

~ 

### york-hours (NClude 

### access, testing, audclose-up) 

### Labor

cost 

### (®$85/h our 

### Parts Cost Total Costs (Iabor+ 

### parts) Number of

O.S. 

### Registered Prodocts 

### Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet Inspectiou,repair, ctc. 2 ., ~ , 15000 ~ ~;~ ni~~ 47 ~
~:i~ i:i

~ ...

~ na

i ~

iu

~ ,:" i ,~ .:
~ . . n 

### The known number of products in compliance: Nwnbcr Total Costs of oomplianoe for U.S. flee[: $712,990 Costscoveredunderwarranty(ifknown) $Warranta
Ou-Coudition Costs:

~ -J Total cost of com liauce =$ 712,990. for U.S. 0eet 

### Action (e.g., lnspectioq replacemeut) ~ 

### ✓ ork-hours (inolude access,

### testiug, and closeup) Laborcost

(@$85/hour) 

### PartsCost CostperProduct
inspection ~

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Ose this fleld to exp[arn anything zn the EsHmatedCosts tab[e

that was assumed or migh[ nat be obvious. This field can also be used to exp(ain warranty costs): Execative Order 12866: 

### Could the AD be considered a°significantregolatory actlon"7

~~ 

### No YES* 0 NO ® *Explanation: DOT Regnlatory Policies and Procedares: Is the AD significant7

~ 

### ./ Na YES* O NO ® *Explanation: 

### Regolatory Fleaibility Ac[: ~ 

### Will the AD have a significant eoonomio impact on a substantial number of small entities9 Explain for eithec a Yes or No answec 

### ~~ 'No 

### YES L] NO ® Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

### This AD could aFFect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only moda of tcaneportation7

~~~ 

### No YES* O NO ® *Explanation:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
BALANCE SHEET AS OF AUGUST 30, 1997 AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE
FIFTY-TWO WEEKS ENDED AUGUST 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-30-1997
<CASH>                                          23,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,533
<PP&E>                                          94,584
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,043
<BONDS>                                         85,903
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           32,521
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,252
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               302,766
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  288,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,740
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,264
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,476
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,476
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>