alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 23 (Thursday, February 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6140-6141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2479]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Record of Decision for the Final Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement for Developing Homeport Facilities for 
Three NIMITZ-Class Aircraft Carriers in Support of the U.S. Pacific 
Fleet at Naval Air Station North Island, Coronado, CA

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Record of Decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (Navy), after carefully weighing 
the operational and environmental consequences of the proposed action, 
announces its decision to upgrade carrier berthing (Berth LIMA) at 
Naval Air Station (NAS) North Island to comply with current nuclear-
powered aircraft carrier (CVN) facility requirements. The minor 
infrastructure improvements include construction of: A fender system, 
mooring bollards, security building, and antiterrorism (AT)/force 
protection (FP) improvements, as well as the installation of 
information systems, electrical and mechanical utility upgrades, 
paving, drainage, and site improvements. In addition, the Navy 
announces its intent to implement additional vehicular traffic 
mitigation measures to address new facts and circumstances relevant to 
traffic. Although the 2008 Traffic Study included in the 2008 Final 
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) shows that direct 
traffic impacts have not changed significantly since they were studied 
in the 1999 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), additional 
traffic mitigation measures minimize the cumulative effects of 
vehicular traffic when three homeported aircraft carriers are 
simultaneously in port.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Record of Decision (ROD) has been 
distributed to all those individuals who requested a copy of the Final 
SEIS and agencies and organizations that received a copy of the Final 
SEIS. The complete text of the ROD is available for public viewing on 
the project Web site at http://www.nimitzcarriersseis.com/ along with 
copies of the Final SEIS and supporting documents. Single copies of the 
ROD will be made available upon request by contacting Mr. Robert 
Montana, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, 2730 McKean 
Street, Building 291, San Diego, CA 92136, telephone: 619-556-8509.


[[Page 6141]]


    Dated: February 2, 2009.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-2479 Filed 2-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
de minimis issues for MACT floor/control of sources emitting HAP 

 Steven Silverman 

 to: 

 dnovello 

 10/14/2009 11:59 AM 

 Cc: 

 Keith Barnett, Wendy Blake 

 Show Details 

David, 

If i understood your inquiry, you questioned whether EPA would be 

applying 

MACT standards to sources emitting small amount of HAP, and suggested 

that 

de minimis concepts could be invoked not to. The second National Lime 

case appears to speak to both issues and says EPA has a duty to set MACT 

standards for each HAP emitted (233 F 3d at 634) and that EPA reasonably 

interpreted the statute to preclude use of de minis concepts in 

establishing MACT floor (p. 640). We would apply those principles here. 

If I misinterpreted your question, please let me know. Also, please 

remember that we need to docket all of these discussions. 

Steve
H. R. 3059

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 304 West

Michigan Street in Stuttgart, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Lloyd L. Burke Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

304 West Michigan Street in Stuttgart, Arkansas, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Lloyd L. Burke Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lloyd L.

Burke Post Office’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### TATUM V. RIDDLE.

(Decided June 5, 1913.)

Appeal from Clay Circuit Court. .

Heard before Hon. A. IT. Alston.

No counsel marked for appellant. ' Riddle, Ellis, Riddle & Pruet, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on certificate.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3169

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate reconsideration 

as an intervening step between initial benefit entitlement decisions and 

subsequent hearings on the record on such decisions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2003

Mr. GOODE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

reconsideration as an intervening step between initial 

benefit entitlement decisions and subsequent hearings on 

the record on such decisions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Social Security Disability 

5 Determination Simplification Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 3169 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF RECONSIDERATION IN THE RE2 VIEW PROCESS GOVERNING DECISIONS ON 

3 BENEFIT ENTITLEMENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 205(b)(1) of the Social 

5 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(b)(1)) is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘Opportunity for 

7 a hearing under this title in accordance with this sub8 section with respect to any initial decision or determina9 tion under this title shall be available without any require10 ment for intervening reconsideration.’’. 

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 205(b) of 

12 such Act is amended—

13 (1) by striking paragraph (2); and 

14 (2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para15 graph (2). 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply with respect to initial decisions and 

18 determinations (subject to opportunity for a hearing to the 

19 extent provided under section 205(b) of the Social Secu20 rity Act) issued after 1 year after the date of the enact21 ment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 3.(i)(a)

                         CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO THE

                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF

                            EDISON CONTROL CORPORATION      

   To:  The Secretary of State
        State of New Jersey

             Pursuant to the provisions of Section 14A:9-2(4) and Section
   14A:9-4(3), Corporations, General, of the New Jersey Statutes, the
   undersigned corporation executes the following Certificate of Amendment to
   its Certificate of Incorporation:

             1.   The name of the corporation is Edison Control Corporation.

             2.   The following amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation
   was approved by the directors and thereafter duly adopted by the
   shareholders of the corporation on the 9th day of June, 1998:

             Resolved, that the first paragraph of Article 3 of the
   Certificate of Incorporation be amended to read as follows:

             3.  Number of Shares.  The aggregate number of shares
             of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to
             issue is twenty-one million (21,000,000) shares, of
             which twenty million (20,000,000) shares are to be
             Common Stock with a par value of $.01 per share and
             one million (1,000,000) shares are to be Preferred
             Stock with a par value of $.01 per share. 

             3.   The number of shares entitled to vote upon the amendment
   was 2,275,933.

             4.   The number of shares voting for and against such amendment
   is as follows:

   Number of Shares Voting                      Number of Shares Voting
       For Amendment                               Against Amendment   

         1,991,526                                        284,407


   Dated this 9th day of June, 1998.

                                      EDISON CONTROL CORPORATION


                                      By: /s/ William B. Finneran
                                           William B. Finneran
                                           Chairman of the Board
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000             DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-02-2000             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000             JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                           3,145                   3,145
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,252                  35,252
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,071                   2,071
<INVENTORY>                                    105,331                 105,331
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,679                 156,679
<PP&E>                                          85,250                  85,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,767                  35,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 335,305                 335,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,411                  62,411
<BONDS>                                        153,100                 153,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           19,016                  19,016
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,550                  53,550
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   335,305                 335,305
<SALES>                                         97,070                 195,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,070                 195,193
<CGS>                                           60,820                 122,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,820                 122,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,958                  62,809
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,793                   7,919
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    499                   2,091
<INCOME-TAX>                                       192                     829
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                307                   1,262
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       307                   1,262
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
§ 343.10 Purpose and scope. This part establishes consumer protections in connection with retail sales practices, solicitations, advertising, or offers of any insurance product or annuity to a consumer by: ( a ) Any institution; or
( b ) Any other person that is engaged in such activities at an office of the institution or on behalf of the institution.
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 12403A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–1898

Mr. Jason Abkowitz

Raytheon Company

8350 Alban Road, Suite 700

Springfield,VA 22150

Dear Mr. Abkowitz:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter dated January 15, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Raytheon Company (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an amendment to your 

current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 

61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and 

(2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the 

petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You requested an amendment to change the company 

name from Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems to Raytheon Company.

12

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

 

1 The petitioner also requested to add aircraft. At this time, the FAA is unable to act on this request. When the 

FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the petitioner. 2 The petitioner also requested relief from the statutory requirement to hold an airman’s certificate. The FAA 

does not possess the authority to exempt the petitioner from the statutory requirement to hold an airman 

certificate as prescribed in 49 USC § 44711. In Exemption No. 11213 issued to Aeryon Labs, the FAA has 

determined that operations can safely be conducted under this exemption by a PIC holding an airline transport, 

commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 12403

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Raytheon Company is hereafter referred to as the operator. All 

conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 12403 remain in effect.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on August 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52741-52742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Central Idaho Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-

[[Page 52742]]

393), the Salmon-Challis National Forest's Central Idaho Resource 
Advisory Committee will conduct a business meeting which is open to the 
public.

DATES: Monday, October 19, 2009, beginning at 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Public Lands Center, 1206 South Challis Street, Salmon, 
Idaho.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics will include review of RAC 
2009 projects, possible approval of RAC project proposals, and 
preparing for the 2010 RAC project season. The meeting is an open 
public forum. Some RAC members may attend the meeting by conference 
call or electronically.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William A. Wood, Forest Supervisor and 
Designated Federal Officer, at 208-756-5111.

    Dated: September 30, 2009.
William A. Wood,
Forest Supervisor, Salmon-Challis National Forest.
[FR Doc. E9-24649 Filed 10-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3209 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 604

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3209

                          [Report No. 108-289]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 2003

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                             June 25, 2004

              Reported by Mr. Domenici, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Reclamation Project Authorization Act of 1972 to clarify 
the acreage for which the North Loup division is authorized to provide 
        irrigation water under the Missouri River Basin project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF ACREAGE FOR IRRIGATION WATER.

    Section 501 of the Reclamation Project Authorization Act of 1972 
(43 U.S.C. 615dddd) is amended by striking ``fifty-three thousand 
acres'' and inserting ``approximately 53,000 acres''.

                                                       Calendar No. 604

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3209

                          [Report No. 108-289]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Reclamation Project Authorization Act of 1972 to clarify 
the acreage for which the North Loup division is authorized to provide 
        irrigation water under the Missouri River Basin project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 25, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3





                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                                U.S. VISION, INC.
                                STOCK OPTION PLAN







      U.S. Vision, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), adopted a Stock
Option Plan dated as of February 29, 1996 (the "Plan"), providing for shares of
the Company's common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the "Common Stock"), to
be issued under the Plan pursuant to the terms and conditions stated in the
Plan. Subject to stockholder approval, at a meeting held on April 19, 2000, the
Board of Directors of the Company adopted resolutions amending the Plan to
increase the aggregate number of shares subject to issuance under the Plan from
1,300,000 to 2,000,000. Also, at the Annual Meeting of stockholders of the
Company held on June 22, 2000, the stockholders of the Company approved the
amendment to the Plan.

      As a result of the approval by the Company's Board of Directors and the
stockholders, the Plan is hereby amended to increase the total number of shares
subject to issuance under the Plan from 1,300,000 to 2,000,000.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, acting by and through its officers
hereunto duly authorized, has executed this instrument as of the 22nd day of
June, 2000.







                                    U.S. VISION, INC.


                                    By:/s/ KATHY G. CULLEN
                                       -----------------------------------
                                    Kathy G. Cullen, Senior Vice
                                    President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24501]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).
    Title: Commercial Encryption Items under Commerce Jurisdiction.
    OMB Control Number: 0694-0104.
    Form Number(s): N/A.
    Type of Request: Regular submission (Extension).
    Burden Hours: 8,090.
    Number of Respondents: 940.
    Average Hours per Response: 10 minutes to 20 hours.
    Needs and Uses: The collection is necessary to provide technical 
and end user information for encryption items that are eligible for 
export under license exception or under licenses that authorize exports 
to various destinations. This collection provides technical information 
for programs related to encrypted communications.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Jasmeet Seehra, (202) 395-3123.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 7845, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cbaf83b2a5aea08bafa4a8e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="204468594e454b60444f430e474f56">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Jasmeet Seehra, OMB Desk Officer, via the Internet at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0842697b656d6d7c574326575b6d6d607a694867656a266d6778266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c48ea5b7a9a1a1b09b8fea9b97a1a1acb6a584aba9a6eaa1abb4eaa3abb2">[email protected]</span></a>, or fax to (202) 395-5167.

    Dated: October 7, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-24501 Filed 10-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>