alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3122

To amend the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act 

of 1990 to direct the Secretary of the department in which the Coast 

Guard is operating to issue a regulation prohibiting a vessel with a 

ballast water tank from entering the Great Lakes if more than 5 percent 

of the capacity of the tank contains ballast water. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2003

Mrs. MILLER of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention 

and Control Act of 1990 to direct the Secretary of the 

department in which the Coast Guard is operating to 

issue a regulation prohibiting a vessel with a ballast 

water tank from entering the Great Lakes if more than 

5 percent of the capacity of the tank contains ballast 

water.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Great Lakes Water 

5 Protection Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 3122 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO NONINDIGENOUS AQUATIC NUI2 SANCE PREVENTION AND CONTROL ACT. 

3 (a) PROHIBITION ON ENTRY OF CERTAIN VESSELS

4 INTO THE GREAT LAKES.—Section 1101(b) of the Non5 indigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act 

6 of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 4711(b)) is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following: 

8 ‘‘(5) PROHIBITION ON ENTRY OF CERTAIN VES9 SELS INTO THE GREAT LAKES.—In addition to pro10 mulgating regulations under paragraph (1) and (3), 

11 the Secretary shall issue, not later than 30 days 

12 after the date of enactment of this paragraph, a reg13 ulation that prohibits any vessel with a ballast water 

14 tank from entering the Great Lakes if more than 5 

15 percent of the capacity of the tank contains ballast 

16 water.’’. 

17 (b) CERTIFICATION.—Paragraph (2)(E) of such sec18 tion is amended by inserting before the semicolon at the 

19 end ‘‘and the regulation issued under paragraph (5)’’.

Æ
# C_2009208EN.01000501.xml

| 3.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 208/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 208/5

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion to the EFTA Court by Beschwerdekommission der Finanzmarktaufsicht dated 27 March 2009 in the case of Inconsult Anstalt v Finanzmarktaufsicht

(Case E-4/09)

2009/C 208/05

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter of 27 March 2009 from Beschwerdekommission der Finanzmarktaufsicht (the Appeals Commission of the Financial Market Authority), which was received at the Court Registry on 14 April 2009, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Inconsult Anstalt v Finanzmarktaufsicht, on the following questions:

| 1. | How is Article 2(12) of Directive 2002/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 on insurance mediation to be interpreted as to the criteria by which a website may be regarded as constituting a ‘durable medium’? |
| --- | --- |

1.

How is Article 2(12) of Directive 2002/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 on insurance mediation to be interpreted as to the criteria by which a website may be regarded as constituting a ‘durable medium’?

---
§ 240.8 Capital requirements. ( a ) *Capital required for a state member bank.* A banking institution defined in section 240.2(b)(1) offering or entering into retail forex transactions must be well-capitalized as defined in section 208.43 of Regulation H (12 CFR 208.43).
( b ) *Capital required for an uninsured state-licensed branch of a foreign bank.* A banking institution defined in § 240.2(b)(2) offering or entering into retail forex transactions must be well-capitalized under the capital rules made applicable to it pursuant to § 225.2(r)(3) of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.2(r)(3)).
( c ) *Capital required for financial holding companies and bank holding companies.* A banking institution defined in § 240.2(b)(3) or (4) offering or entering into retail forex transactions must be well-capitalized as defined in § 225.2(r) of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.2(r)).
( d ) *Capital required for savings and loan holding companies.* A banking institution defined in § 240.2(b)(5) offering or entering into retail forex transactions must be well-capitalized as defined in § 238.2(s) of Regulation LL (12 CFR 238.2(s)).
( e ) *Capital required for an agreement corporation or Edge Act corporation.* A banking institution defined in § 240.2(b)(6) or (7) offering or entering into retail forex transactions must maintain capital in compliance with the capital adequacy guidelines that are made applicable to an Edge corporation engaged in banking pursuant to § 211.12 (c)(2) of Regulation K (12 CFR 211.12(c)(2)).
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XV Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the
period  ended  June  30, 2006, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
86-A, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
86-A,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management 86-A, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 4, 2006


                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management 86-A, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 4, 2006
# C_2017090EN.01000401.xml

| 23.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/4

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2017/C 90/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 15 December 2016 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 79779 |
| Decision No | : | 232/16/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Prolongation of the alternative fuels infrastructure programme |
| Legal basis | : | Parliamentary Decision of 5 April 2001 on the basis of a proposition by the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy of 21 December 2000. The Parliamentary Decision amends the Energy Act of 29 June 1990 No 50 |
| Type of measure | : | Scheme |
| Objective | : | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | : | Grants |
| Budget | : | NOK 500 million |
| Intensity | : | Up to 100 % |
| Duration | : | End of 2022 |
| Economic sectors | : | Transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Enova |
| Postbox 5700 Sluppen |
| N-7437 Trondheim |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

15 December 2016

Case No

Case No

:

79779

Decision No

Decision No

:

232/16/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Prolongation of the alternative fuels infrastructure programme

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

Parliamentary Decision of 5 April 2001 on the basis of a proposition by the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy of 21 December 2000. The Parliamentary Decision amends the Energy Act of 29 June 1990 No 50

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Scheme

Objective

Objective

:

Environmental protection

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Grants

Budget

Budget

:

NOK 500 million

Intensity

Intensity

:

Up to 100 %

Duration

Duration

:

End of 2022

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Enova

Postbox 5700 Sluppen

N-7437 Trondheim

NORWAY

Other information

Other information

:

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                    [LETTERHEAD OF ELVINGER, HOSS & PRUSSEN]

    We hereby consent to being named and to the summarization of advice
attributed to us in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Stolt-Nielsen S.A. for the
fiscal year ended November 30, 2000.

<TABLE>
<S>                                                    <C>  <C>
                                                       ELVINGER, HOSS & PRUSSEN

                                                       By:  /s/ JEAN HOSS
                                                            -----------------------------------------
                                                            Jean Hoss
</TABLE>

Luxembourg,
May 30, 2001
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 15.1

Deloitte & Touche LLP
333 Clay Street
Suite 2300
Houston, Texas 77002

February 11, 1999

Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc.
1200 Smith Street, Suite 1900
Houston, Texas 77094

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries for the
three-month periods ended December 31, 1998 and 1997 as indicated in our report
dated February 11, 1999; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no
opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1998, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-30917 for Sterling
Chemicals Holdings, Inc. on Form S-3 and in Registration Statement No. 333-52795
for Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc. on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

                                       26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO TERRA
TECH INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 30,
1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                          28,309
<SECURITIES>                                    15,640
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,162
<INVENTORY>                                      3,850
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,129
<PP&E>                                         117,483
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,087
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 336,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,904
<BONDS>                                         82,379
<COMMON>                                         1,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   336,491
<SALES>                                         13,364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,516
<CGS>                                           11,770
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,812
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (59)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,033
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,219
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,736
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,377
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 263.305 Enforcement of orders. ( a ) *Judicial remedies.* Whenever a State member bank fails to comply with an order issued under section 39, the Board may seek enforcement of the order in the appropriate United States district court pursuant to section 8(i)(1) of the FDI Act.
( b ) *Failure to comply with order.* Pursuant to section 8(i)(2)(A) of the FDI Act, the Board may assess a civil money penalty against any State member bank that violates or otherwise fails to comply with any final order issued under section 39 and against any institution-affiliated party who participates in such violation or noncompliance.
( c ) *Other enforcement action.* In addition to the actions described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the Board may seek enforcement of the provisions of section 39 or this part through any other judicial or administrative proceeding authorized by law.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3029 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3029

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 255 North Main Street in Jonesboro, Georgia, as the ``S. Truett Cathy 
                         Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 255 
North Main Street in Jonesboro, Georgia, shall be known and designated 
as the ``S. Truett Cathy Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``S. Truett Cathy Post Office 
Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# C_2021245EN.01002001.xml

| 24.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/20

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 25 February 2021

in Case E-5/20

SMA SA and Société Mutuelle d’Assurance du Bâtiment et des Travaux Publics v Finanzmarktaufsicht Liechtenstein

(State liability – Directive 2009/138/EC – Supervisory obligations – Insurance claims – Policy holders and beneficiaries)

(2021/C 245/16)

In Case E-5/20, SMA SA and Société Mutuelle d’Assurance du Bâtiment et des Travaux Publics v Finanzmarktaufsicht Liechtenstein – REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Supreme Court of the Principality of Liechtenstein (Fürstlicher Oberster Gerichtshof) concerning the interpretation of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II), in particular Articles 27 and 28, and its predecessors Directive 73/239/EEC, Directive 88/357/EEC and Directive 92/49/EEC, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur), and Bernd Hammermann, Judges, gave judgment on 25 February 2021, the operative part of which is as follows:

Articles 27 and 28 of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II), Directive 73/239/EEC, Directive 88/357/EEC and Directive 92/49/EEC do not confer any express rights on economic operators that claim to be creditors of an insurance undertaking in circumstances such as those of the main proceedings and cannot give rise to any liability claim against a supervisory authority under the principle of State liability.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.7

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                           COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION
                        BROAD BASED 2000 INCENTIVE PLAN



  WHEREAS, COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION (the "Company") has heretofore adopted the
BROAD BASED 2000 INCENTIVE PLAN (the Broad Based Plan); and

  WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Broad Based Plan in certain
respects;

  NOW, THEREFORE, the Broad Based Plan shall be amended as follows, effective as
of February 8, 2001:

  1.  The number "1,300,000 shall be substituted for the number "800,000" in the
first sentence of Section 4.1 of the Broad Based Plan.

  2.  As amended hereby, the Broad Based Plan is specifically ratified and
reaffirmed.



                                                APPROVED:

                                                /s/ William C. Lemmer
                                                ________________________________
                                                William C. Lemmer
                                                Vice President, General Counsel
                                                  and Secretary

                                                Date:  February 8, 2001
§ 313.52 Request from a creditor agency for services of a hearing official. ( a ) The FDIC may provide a hearing official upon request of the creditor agency when the debtor is employed by the FDIC and the creditor agency cannot provide a prompt and appropriate hearing before a hearing official furnished pursuant to another lawful arrangement.
( b ) The FDIC may provide a hearing official upon request of a creditor agency when the debtor works for the creditor agency and that agency cannot arrange for a hearing official.
( c ) The Director shall arrange for qualified personnel to serve as hearing officials.
( d ) Services rendered under paragraph (a) of this section shall be provided on a fully reimbursable basis pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1535.
# C_2023087EN.01003201.xml

| 9.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 87/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 87/32

---

Dangerous substances – List of authorisation decisions taken by the EEA EFTA States in accordance with Article 44(5) of Regulation (EU) 528/2012 in the first half of 2022

(2023/C 87/09)

Subcommittee I on the free movement of goods

To be noted by the EEA Joint Committee

With reference to EEA Joint Committee Decision No 225/2013 of 13 December 2013, the EEA Joint Committee is invited to note the following lists concerning authorisation decisions adopted on the basis of Article 44(5) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 for the period 1 January – 30 June 2022, at their meeting on 28 October 2022.

---

ANNEX

List of authorisation decisions

The following authorisation decisions in accordance with Article 44(5) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012) have been taken in the EEA EFTA States during the period 1 January – 30 June 2022:

| Biocidal Product Name | Union authorisation decisions under Article 44(5) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 | Country | Date of decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Pesguard® Gel | 32021R1044 | Liechtenstein | 14.7.2021 (1) |
| SchwabEX-Guard | 32022R0114 | Iceland | 2.3.2022 |
| SchwabEX-Guard | 32022R0114 | Liechtenstein | 4.2.2022 |
| SchwabEX-Guard | 32022R0114 | Norway | 23.2.2022 |
| ARIEL chlorine Professional System 5 chlorine bleach for white wash | 32022R0527 | Iceland | 2.6.2022 |
| ARIEL chlorine Professional System 5 chlorine bleach for white wash | 32022R0527 | Liechtenstein | 30.5.2022 |
| ARIEL chlorine Professional System 5 chlorine bleach for white wash | 32022R0527 | Norway | 19.5.2022 |

Biocidal Product Name

Union authorisation decisions under Article 44(5) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012

Country

Date of decision

Pesguard® Gel

32021R1044

Liechtenstein

14.7.2021 (1)

SchwabEX-Guard

32022R0114

Iceland

2.3.2022

SchwabEX-Guard

32022R0114

Liechtenstein

4.2.2022

SchwabEX-Guard

32022R0114

Norway

23.2.2022

ARIEL chlorine Professional System 5 chlorine bleach for white wash

32022R0527

Iceland

2.6.2022

ARIEL chlorine Professional System 5 chlorine bleach for white wash

32022R0527

Liechtenstein

30.5.2022

ARIEL chlorine Professional System 5 chlorine bleach for white wash

32022R0527

Norway

19.5.2022

---

(1)  Unintendedly omitted from the list of authorisation decisions 2nd half 2021.

---