## Articles 

# Indoor Exposure to Molds and Allergic Sensitization Beate Jacob, 7

"2 Beate Ritz,3 Ulrike Gehring, 1-2Andrea Koch,4 Wolfgang Bischof,4 H . E . Wichmann,~~z andJoachimHeinrich' forthe INGA-Study Group IGSF-Institute of Epidemiology, Munich, Germany ; Zlnstitute of Medical Data Management, Biometrics, and Epidemiology, LudwigMaximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany; 3Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA ; 'Department of Indoor Climatology, University of Jena, Erfurt, Germany Evidence that indoor dampness and mold growth are associated with respiratory health has been accumulating, but few studies have been able to examine health risks in relation to measured levels ofindoor mold exposure. In particular, little is known about the contribution of indoor molds to the development of allergic sensitization. As a part ofan ongoingstudy examining the effects of ambient air pollutants on respiratory health and atopic diseases in German school children, we examined the relation between viable mold levels indoors and allergic sensitization in 272 children. We examined whether allergic sensitization in children is associated with higher fungal spore count in settled house dust sampled fromliving room floors

. Adjusting for age, sex, parental education, region of residency, and parental history of atopy, we found that mold spore counts for Cladosporiumand Aspergillus were associated with an increased risk of allergic sensitization. Sensitized children exposed to high levels ofmold spores (> 90th percentile) were more likely to suffer fromsymptoms ofrhinoconjunctivitis. We conclude that elevated indoor concentrations of molds in wintertime might play a role in increasing the risk of developing atopic symptoms and allergic sensitization not only to molds but also to other common, inhaled allergens. These effects were strongest in the group of children who had lived in the same home since birth. Key words: allergic sensitization, house dust, indoor allergen exposure, molds. Environ Health Perspect 110 :647-653 (2002) . [Online 24 May20021 

### http://ehpnet] . niehs.nih.gov/docs/2002/I IOp647-653jacob/abstract.html The development of allergic sensitization and atopic disease in children is a function of a genetic predisposition to react to antigens and the timing and extent of exposure to allergenic agents. Evidence is accumulating that indoor allergen exposure early in life stimulates the development of allergic sensitization (1-,3) . Because most children and adults spend most of their time indoors, much attention has been directed to identifying indoor sources of allergens. Housedust is a complex mixture of various biocontaminants and a major source of allergens in nonindustrial indoor environments. House dust contains allergens such as mites, epithels of pet dander, and molds (1-6), and threshold values at which exposure maycause sensitization have been proposed. Although some authors suggest sensitization to molds as a risk factor for allergic diseases and asthma (7,8), it is still unclear whether allergic sensitization is a risk factor for asthma (9) . Epidemiologicstudies reported positive associations between respiratory symptoms and living in damp houses (10-m), a condition thought to permit mold growth. Yet little is known about the contribution of indoor mold levels to allergic sensitization rates (17,18) . Some reasons for the lack of information are that environmental monitoring is time and cost intensive and requires a high level of subject cooperation. In the present study we were able to use actual measurement of mold spores instead of relying on self-reports of mold growth to examine the 

### role viable mold spores contained in house dust play in causing allergic sensitization and asthmatic and allergic symptoms in children. 

## Materials and Methods Studypopulation and selection ofhomes. We conducted two crass-sectional surveys in 1992-1993 and 1995-1996 to study the long-termhealth effects ofambient air pollution in German school children ages 5-14 years living in three areas of Saxony-Anhalt [n = 2,470 children (89.1%) and n = 2,814 (74.7%) participation rate, respectively, for each survey] . In both surveys, we elicited information about social and environmental factors (19) and asked parents to report allergic and respiratory symptoms and diseases for their children. In addition, our study physician examined all children and drew blood samples. For a select subgroup of children we were able to collect additional data, including samples of house dust and information concerning building and housing characteristics and living habits. Drawing fromboth survey populations, we selected affected (case) and unaffected (control) children; cases were defined as children who could be classified as atopic according to at least one of the following three criteria: a positive skin prick test ; at least one positive specific IgE test (CAPRAST-FEIA

; IgE > 0

.35 kU/L) ; or physician diagnosis of asthma at any time before the survey. We used a stratified randomsampling approach to select children in two age 

### groups (5-7 and 8-10 years) fromthree residential areas; 80 children each were selected in the younger age group and between 40 and 50 in the older age group for a total of 370 case and 370 control children. Parents of 231 selected case children (62%) agreed to participate. Control children had to be nonatopic and nonasthmatic (i .e., they did not meet any of the above-mentioned criteria for cases. Parents of223 selected control children (60°,%) agreed to participate. Overall, parents of 454 children allowed us to collect household dust samples. Trained personnel performed interviews to document housing characteristics and visited homes twice at an interval of approximately 6 months to collect two dust samples. All 454 homes were visited between 1996 and 1998, but for the following analyses we considered only the homes of 340 children (178 case and 162 control children) who did not move between the medical examination and the home visit. For the following secondary analyses focusing on mold exposure and allergic sensitization, we excluded 20 subjects with missing data for IgE sensitization and seven subjects missing other covariate data. We further restricted our case group to sensitized children only (i .e., those children testing positive in at least one RAST test), excluding 41 children who qualified as Address correspondence to B. Jacob, GSF-Institure of Epidemiology, Ingolstadter Landstr . 1 D-85758 Neuherberg, Germany

. Telephone: +49-89-3187- 4150. Fax: +49-89-3187-3380. E-mail : beate.jacobCt t-online .de We thank G

. Wdlke and B. Hollstein for coordinadng the home visits

. The Federal Ministry for Education, Science, Research and Technology, grant EE 93016, supported this study. The Inga-Study Group : GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Neuherberg, Institute of Epidemiology (H.E. Wichmann, J . Heinrich, P . Schneider, J . Cyrys, 1 . Grog, G. Wolke, G. Silbernagl, U. Gehring, B. Jacob, A. Houzer), Institute of Ecological Chemistry (I . Gebefiigi, G. Ldrinci, J . Schnelle) ; Friedrich Schiller University-Jena Institute ofOccupational, Social and Environmental Medicine (W . Bischof, A. Koch, J . Vbitthauer, K.J . Heilemann), Institute of Clinical Immunology (L. Jager, B. Fahlbusch, G. Schlenvoigt) ; Gro(3hansdorf Hospital-Hamburg Center for Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (H. Magnussen, K. Richter, R. Jorres) ; University of Utrecht-Division of Environmental and Occupational Health (B. Brunekreef, J . Douwes, G. Doekes) . Received 18 May 2001 ; accepted 17 December 2001 . Environmental Health Perspectives " VOLUME 110I NUMBER 7I July 2002 647

### Articles " Jacob et al .

cases only according to a positive skin-prick test. We considered the validity and reliability of the prick test results questionable because different test kits were used in each survey. Thus, 115 cases and 157 controls remained in the analyses. We chose to use only house dust samples taken in winter (November-April) to minimize the influence of seasonal variation (20) and to make our results comparable to previous studies using a similar restriction to winter sampling (8,10,11,21-24) . Approval of the study protocol was granted by the Ethics Committees of the University of Rostock and the University of Munich (LMU), and the study was performed in accordance with the institutional guidelines for the protection of human subjects . Written informed consent was obtained fromthe parents of all participating children. House dust sampling and mold identification. Dust sampling and extraction procedures were identical to those used in a parallel study of adults (25) and described in more detail elsewhere (20,26) . In each home, a dust sample was taken fromthe living roomfloor (97°'o were carpeted floors) by vacuuming an area of 1 mz for 2 min in a highly standardized manner using the same type of vacuumcleaner (Type Fliisterjet Vitall 371, 1,000 W

; Phillips, Hamburg, Germany) and the same device (collector and filter; ALK, Horsholm, Denmark) to collect dust on a paper filter (20) . In general, samples were obtained fromcarpets . The dust filters were weighed before and after vacuuming to analyze the settled dust gravimetrically. The dust samples were stored at roomtemperature and analyses were performed within 10days after sampling. We analyzed 30 mg (500 pm) sieved house dust for identification and quantification of viable molds. Dusts were diluted in 0 .9%NaCI and plated on DG18 (dichloran18% glycerol agar) and 0 .1 g/L chloramphenicol was added to prevent bacterial growth. Plates were incubated at 25°C for 10 days (20,27), and all analyses were duplicated. The number of colony-forming units (CFU) was counted and expressed as CFU per gramof dust . Colonies were identified to genus level using high-powered microscopy (Ergaval ; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) . 

### The total number of CFUs may be of limited clinical and epidemiologic relevance because spores fromdifferent species have different allergenic potential (11) . Therefore, we studied both the total counts and the counts of selected mold genera separately. The detection limit for total molds was 1,000 CFU/g dust, and, in some cases (high concentrations of total molds) for genusspecific CFU, 10,000 CFU/g dust . Allergic sensitization. Blood collection, centrifugation of blood, and serumstorage followed the protocol of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) (19,28) . The serum samples were stored at -20°C

. Specific IgE for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (d1), car allergens (el), Cladosporium(m2), mixed grasses (gG), and birch (t3) were measured by the CAP-FEIA method by Pharmacia Diagnostics (Freiburg, Germany) using identical batches of reagents for all assays (29) . The measurement range was 0.35-100 kU/L, with a detection limit < 0.35 kU/L. Allergic sensitization was defined as testing positive for at least one specific IgE (>- 0.35 kU/L) . Statistical analysis. We performed statistical analyses using the statistical analysis package SAS for Windows version 6.12 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) . We included in our multivariate analyses only those children for whomwe had complete covariate data for potential risk factors for atopic diseases (age, sex, region of residency, educational level of the parents, and positive parental history ofatopy) in addition to outcome and exposure information. Thus, we performed a complete-subject analysis for 272 children (115 sensitized cases and 157 controls) . Because of the log-normal distribution of mold spore counts, we present the median and the 25th and 90th percentile as measures of variation. We calculated the crude prevalence for sensitized cases and controls for binary response variables of allergic diseases or symptoms. We used the nonparametric Spearman rank-order coefficient (r,) to determine the relationships between the CFU of several genera of mold spores. Because established thresholds for mold genera are lacking, we classified subjects into three exposure categories (subjects exposed <_ 25th, 25th-90th, and > 90th percentile) . Multiple logistic regression analyses allowed us to examine the effect of mold spore exposures on allergic sensitization, atopic symptoms, and atopic diseases adjusting for a fixed set of potential confounding variables (age, sex, region of residency, educational level of the parents, and positive parental history of atopy) by including themin the model . We report adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95°,0 confidence intervals (CI) for each allergic outcome and mold exposure category. Table 1. Basic description ofthestudy population of 272 children in eastern Germany. 

### Characteristics Sensitized cases (n=115) Controls In=157) No. Percent No. Percent Demographic characteristic Place of residency Zerbst 42 Bitterfeld 20 Hettstedt 53 Sex Boys 71 Girls 44 Age 5-7years 69 8-10years 46 Parental education s 10grades 58 Z 12 grades 57 Positive family history of atopy 29 Dampness at home 29 Living in the same apartment since birth 43 Allergic sensitization z 1 BAST + 115 BAST Derp1 + 48 BASTcat + 30 BAST birch + 39 BAST gras + 84 BAST Cladosporium+ 14 Allergic symptoms' Sneezing attacks 16 Redeyes 19 Runny or stuffed nose 16 Redeyes and runny or stuffed nose 5 Persistent wheezing 8 lItching rash 33 Allergic diseases Asthmab-c 17 Asthma attacks' 4 Hayfeverb 12 Eczemab 23 36 .5 49 31 .2 17.4 32 20.4 46 .1 76 48.4 61 .7 79 50.3 38.3 78 497 600 94 59.9 40.0 63 40 1 50.4 83 52.9 49.6 74 47.1 25.2 27 17.2 25.2 35 223 37.4 58 36.9 100 0 41 .7 0 26 .1 0 33,9 0 73.0 0 12 .2 0 13.9 4 2.6 16.5 5 3.2 13.9 B 5.2 4.4 0 0 .0 7.5 3 2.0 29.2 14 9 .1 14 .8 0 0 .0 3.6 0 00 10 .4 1 0 .7 20 .0 14 9.0 eln past 12 months. bLifetime diagnosis. Toctor's diagnosis of asthma, asthmoid bronchitis, or spastic bronchitis. 648 VOLUME 1101 NUMBER 7 1 July 2002 " Environmental Health Perspectives

### Results

Study population. Table 1 presents characteristics of the study group, including the distribution of allergic sensitization (RASTCAP >- 1), allergic symptoms, and diseases of sensitized cases and nonsensitized, nonasthmatic controls. We observed allergic sensitization [defined as testing positive for one specific IgE (> 0.35 kU/L) , i .e. for Der p], cat, birch, grass, or Cladosporium] for 115 children referred to as cases. Our study sample consists of 150 boys and 122 girls because more boys tested positive for specific IgE. Parents of children who were sensitized and thus belonged to the case group selfreported being atopic slightly more often (25.2%vs. 17.2%) than parents ofnonsensitized children, but we observed no difference in parental reports concerning dampness of homes and residential mobility since birth of the child in both groups. Viable mold spore contamination Of homes . The average weight of house dust taken from living roomfloors was 0 .90 t 0 .85 g/mZ and was similar for case and control homes (0.87 t 1 .01 for cases; 0 .92 t 0.71 for controls), yet we observed a large variation in mold levels between households. Table 2 presents the distribution of number of CFUs obtained per gramof dust taken in winter for total (all species) mold spores and selected groups of the most common molds found in homes. Although CFUvalues varied greatly, we found only one sample with > 106 CFU/g dust (76 x 106 CFU/g dust) . Furthermore, no sample was free of molds. Restricting the period of analysis to winter samples only (November-April) meant that more than 60%

of our samples were negative for Alternaria spores, and spore frequency was low

in all samples positive for Alternaria (geometric mean 26; 95%CI, 16-43 ; 90th percentile, 10,000 CFU/g dust) . Thus, we present results only for three genera of mold spores found most commonly in wintertime- Cladosporium, Perzicillium, and Aspergillus

. Figure 1 shows the cumulative frequency of the mold concentrations in the homes of cases and controls. 

### Cladosporiurn and Penicilliumspecies were the most prevalent mold genera, but all three molds were positively correlated with and contributed to our total viable mold spore counts in the wintertime (r = 0.52 for Chadosporium, 0.49 for Penicillium, and 0.43 for Aspergillus) in both case and control homes (Table 3) . Furthermore, Cladosporiumlevels were not or were only weakly correlated with the indoor mold species Aspergillus and Penicilliurn in both seasons, suggesting that in the homes we studied two different patterns of mold growth contributed to overall high levels of mold spores; in the first type of home we found the typical indoor species Aspergilhes and Penicilliumcommonly growing on foodstuffs and houseplants (30), and in the second type of home the dominant species was Cladosporium, an outdoor fungus that grows on textiles and foodstuffs when it gains access to the indoor environment .

81,367 70,562-93827 0(0%) 50,000 85,000 210,000 Table 2. Distribution of CFU per gramdust for total and selected genera of mold spores on living room floors of 272households in eastern Germany . 

### Molds Total molds Geometric mean 95%CI n< LOD(%) 25th Percentile Median 90th Percentile Cladosporium Geometric mean 95%CI n< LOD(%) 25th Percentile Median 90th Percentile Penicillium Geometric mean 95% CI n<LODI%) 25th Percentile Median 90th Percentile Aspergillus Geometric mean 95%CI n< LODI%) 25th Percentile Median 90th Percentile LOD, Limit of detection 100 8 0

E E 

### 60 "

40 

### : 1e 

### t . ; 

# r.~ ~? 20 Sensitized cases (n= 115)

" Controls I Cases 2,997

1,531-5,867 19116,5%) 5,000 12,500 40,000 2,041 942-4,425 26(22.6%) 5,000 15,000 55,000 

### Allergic sensitization and mold spore counts in household dust. We examined the association between allergic sensitization of children and mold spore counts in household dust in multiple logistic regression models adjusting the odds ratios for sensitization (at least one RAST-CAP positive test)

856 399-1,836) 31 (270°/Q) LOD 5,000 30,000 

### 1oa > 0 80 Q ~ Bo > ~ 40 E 20 ta 

### . "D.

.

ay 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Total molds (CFO/g dust x 10-3) 

### 100 

# r . > Bu d ;, so 40 E 

### (i zo 0 

## s

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

PenicilliumICFO/g dust x 10-3 ) 

### a lao d 80 d m

. E E 

### 60 40 

### 20 Controls (n= 157) 71,118 61,285-82,530 0(0°/0) 45,000 75,000 195,000 1,501 604-2,804 35 (22 3%) 5,000 10,000 30,000 2,014 1,049-3,866 35(22.3%) 5,000 15,000 50,000 245 117-513 65 (41 .4%) LOD 5,000 25,000

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Cladosporium(CFOlg dust x 10-3) 

### " s 4 r



### 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Aspergillus(CFDIg dust x 10-3) Figure 1 . Cumulative frequencyofthe concentrations of molds in the homes of cases and controls. Environmental Health Perspectives " VOLUME 1101 NUMBER 7 1 July 2002 649

### Articles " Jacob et al .

by age, sex, residential region, parental education, and parental history of atopy. High levels of Cladosporium(35,000 CFU/g dust or > 90th percentile) in wintertime household dust approximately tripled the risk of allergic sensitization in children (OR >- 90th percentile, 2.93; 95%CI, 1 .17-7.36) . Aspergillus spores increased the risk of allergic sensitization at a somewhat lower level [i .e., when the spore count increased above 25,000 CFU/g dust (25th percentile; OR 25th-90th percentile, 2.11 ; 95°'o Cl, 1 .22-3.65; OR z 90th percentile: 1 .76; 95% CI, 0.73-4.28] (Table 4) . Sensitization of exposed children, however, was not limited to Cladosporiurn (specific IgE positive for Cladosporium) . Rather, children exposed to increased viable mold levels were more likely to be sensitized to other allergens as well, such as pollen, cat, or house dust mites, similar towhat has been reported previously (17) . Considering mite allergen exposure as a potential confounder, we included also Derpl and Derfl levels into the model, but the results did not change (data not shown) . For I'enicilliumand also for total molds counts, we found slightly increased sensitization risks with exposure at high levels of mold spores in winter, but our effect estimates were imprecise and included the null value. In summer, however, Penicilliumwas the most important indoor contributor to overall sensitization (OR a 90th percentile, 2.83; 95%CI, 1 .25-6.44; data not shown) . Our results suggest a positive trend for risk of general allergic sensitization-notjust to mold allergens-when children are exposed to mold spores. When restricting the analyses to children who lived in the same apartment since birth (n = 101), odds ratios increased for Aspergillus counts and showed a dose-response pattern (OR 25th-90th percentile, 2 .21 ; 95%CI, 0.83-5.90; OR >- 90th percentile, 3.14

; 95%CI, 0.63-15.7) . Effects were also observed for high levels of Cladosporium (OR ~o 90th percentile, 4.21 ; 95%CI, 0.72-24

.7) and total molds counts (OR >- 90th percentile, 2.53; 95%CI, 0.52-12.4), but because of the loss in study subjects, the 95% confidence intervals included the null value. We did not observe consistent or strong associations with wintertime Penicilliumspore counts in house dust (Figure 2) . Allergic symptoms and diseases and mold spore counts in bousebold dust. Sensitized cases exposed to high levels of viable mold spores (> 90th percentile) were more likely to suffer fromsymptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis, including pink eye and runny and/or congested nose (OR 10.8 for total molds, OR 19. 8 for Cladosporium, and OR 23.8 for Penicillium

; Table 5) . We did not have enough subjects to drawa conclusion about the occurrence of other atopic and allergic symptoms and diseases, but in general high mold spore counts of any type seemed to increase symptomprevalence to some degree. 

## Discussion Distribution of molds. Studies from Germany (31), Sweden (9), Denmark, the Netherlands (22), the United Kingdom(32), and Michigan (USA) (24) reported that Penicilliurn was the most prevalent indoor mold genus, followed by Cladosporium, whereas AspeiRillus was the most commonly isolated indoor mold in Israel (17) . Although the molds Cladosporiumspp. and Alternaria spp. are generally considered outdoor species, they are also commonly found indoors. Outdoor mold levels vary greatly with season, and these variations may also d N

N .y 

### d N d a 

### 100 90 

### 80 70 SO 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 90 e0 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 

### d u d N .y m u `m a ges_25 ges25_ ges50_ ges75_ ges90_

Total molds

pen25 pen25_ pen50_ pen75_ pen90_

Penicillium 

### contribute to variations in indoor levels of these molds . Therefore, we restricted our analyses of indoor dust samples to those taken in winter (November-April), when Cladosporiumand Alternaria are less likely to growoutdoors. Aspergillus and Penicillium are the two most frequently encountered genera of indoor molds.The number of CFUs per gramof settled house dust is generally higher than the number measured in air samples because samples of settled dust probably reflect a cumulative measure of mold spores in homes . The number of CFUs per gramof dust found in our study was higher than those reported fromother studies that used surface sampling methods (2,~. Our geometric mean of CFUs per gram dust for total molds was 81,367 in the group of sensitized cases and 71,118 in controls. Verhoeffet al . (22) sampled settled dust from 100 N 

### U 80 N

.y 

### d N d d a 60 

### = 40 20 0

d d N m u m a 100 90 80 70 sg 50 40 30 20 10 g cla_25 c1a25_ cIa50_ 605 _ cIa90_ Cladosporium

asp 25 asp25_ asp50_ asp75_ asp90_

Aspergillus 

### Figure 2 . Percentage of sensitized children in the quartiles of exposure to molds (cases and controls) . Table 3. Spearman correlation coefficient matrix of the concentration of the mold spores on living room floors in winter of 272households of children in eastern Germany. Cases Total molds Total Molds r 1 .0 ~rValue Cladosporium r 0.55 l}Value 00001 Penicillium r 0.48 IrValue 00001 Aspergillus r 0.44 p-Value 0.0001 Controls Cladosporium Penicillium Aspergillus 0 .47 0

.49 0

.37 0.0001 0

.0001 00001 1 .0 -0.003 011

0 .975 0254 009 1 .0 0 .27 0240 0003 0 .19 0.25 1 .0 0 .019 0

.002 650 VOLUME 1101 NUMBER 7 1 July 2002 " Environmental Health Perspectives

## Articles " Indoor exposure to molds and allergic sensitization

mostly noncarpeted bedroomfloors over 2 months (October-November) and reported 8,300 CFU/g dust in homes of children with respiratory symptoms and 9,940 CFU/g dust in control household samples. Wickmann (,'~ reported a mean of only 1,000 CFU/g dust sampled fromliving roomfloors in late winter (February-March) . Total numbers of CFUs per gramdust fromcarpets are significantly higher than for smooth floors W, and 97% of our samples were taken fromcarpeted floors, which may explain the differences. However, comparisons of quantitative and qualitative results fromdifferent studies are of limited value because studies not only used different sampling techniques for the same mold spores, but each study also focused on the identification of unique and different sets of mold spores (33,34) . Molds and allergic sensitization . Sensitization to molds is a risk factor for allergic diseases (8,9), and molds can be important indoor allergens (1/~. Reports of prevalence of allergic sensitization to molds vary widely ranging from 2%to 30% in subjects with respiratory allergy (3S) . The great variability in reported prevalence could derive fromdifferences in environmental conditions, such as the geoclimatic areas under investigation, differences in population sensitivity, and differences in the characteristics and properties of diagnostic tests used to assess allergen extracts (33) . The number of mold allergens for which reliable tests are available is small compared to other allergen extracts such as mites. Furthermore, isolation, purification, and standardization of allergens produced by molds are a major problemcontributing to measurement error ofunknown size in all studies. The likelihood of developing sensitivity to aeroallergens depends on the degree of atopic susceptibility, the concentration and potency of allergens one is exposed to, and adjuvant factors (36) . As did Garrett et al . (37), we found that winter exposure to high concentrations of mold spores such as Cladosporium increased allergic sensitization. Garrett et al . (37) also reported that atopy was significantly associated with Aspergillus

. In our study, effects were most consistently observed for the species of Cladosporiumand Aspergillus, where exposure above the 90th percentile increased the risk of allergic sensitization approximately 2- or 3-fold (Cladosporium, OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1 .17-7.36

; Aspergillus, OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1 .22-3.65)

. Exposure to high levels of Penicillium (> 55,000 CFU/g dust, > 90th percentile) elevated the risk for allergic 

### Table 4 . Associations between exposure tofungal spores and prevalence of allergic sensitization. Molds Sensitized (CFU/g dust) cases Controls Total molds s 25th Percentile s 48.750 24 >25th/:s 90th Percentile 48.750-200.000 79 >90th Percentile > 200 .000 12 Cladosporium s 25th Percentile s5.000 45 >25th/! . 90th Percentile 5.000-35.000 54 >90th Percentile > 35.000 16 Penicillium s 25th Percentile s 5.000 40 >25th/:5 90th Percentile 5.000-55.000 64 >90th Percentile > 55.000 11 Aspergillus s 25th Percentile LOD 31 >25th/:s 90th Percentile LOD-25.000 72 >90th Percentile > 25.000 12 Crude OR Adjusted OR' (95%C0 (95%C0 44 1 0 1 .0 100 1 .45(0.81-2.58) 1 .56(0 .85-2.861 13 1 .69(0 67-4 29) 1 .67 (0 .65-4 .291 72 1 0 1 .0 76 1 14 (0 68-1 .89) 1 .15(0 .67-1 .95) 9 284(1 .16-698) 293(1 .17-7.36~ 60 1 0 1 .0 85 1 13 (0.68-189) 1 .09(0 .64-1 .84) 12 138(0 55-3 42) 1 .38(0 .54-3.51/ 65 1 0 1 .0 77 2 06 (1 .16-335) 2.11 (1 .22-3.65) 15 1 .68(0.70-4.01) 1 .76(0 .73-4 .28) LOD, limit of detection. °Adjusted forage, sex, residential region, parental education, and parental atopy. Table 5 . Adjusted odds ratios for atopic symptoms and diseases and indoor mold spore counts. Atopic symptoms 

### ORfor fungal exposure above the 90th percentilea Total molds Cladosporium Penicillium Aspergillus Sneezing attacksb 347 (1 .07-11 .3) Red eyes and runny 113 (1 23-103 1) or congested noseb Persistent wheezingb 082 (0.10-7.13) Itching rash° 1 46(0.54-3.96) Asthmard 047 (0.06-3.90) HayfeverF 2 14 (0.39-11 .8) Eczema' 1 65 (0.57-4.81) 1 43 (0.36-5.58) 15 5(2.08-1154 0) 1 18 (0 47-2.94) 1 18 (0.41-339) 052 (0 06-4 27) 1 89(0.35-10.3) 054 (0.12-2.44) 2.12 (0.52-863) NE

17.6 (1 69-183 4) NE 2 .55(0 44-147) 2 15 (0.41-11 4) 0 .62(0.17-224) 1 47 (0 55-3 .93) 1 .74(0 35-8,73) 1 29 (0.27-6.18) 2 .57 (0.54-12,3) NE 1 .21 (0.38-388) 2 16 (0.80-2.52) NE, not estimable. 'Adjusted for age, sex, region of residency, parental education, and parental atopy. dAsthma, asthmoid bronchitis, or spastic bronchitis. bln past 12 months. 'Lifetime. 

### sensitization in winter only slightly, but Penicilliumwas the dominant indoor mold allergen in summer . Although we conducted analyses stratifying for season (summer and winter), these analyses were not always informative because the sample was small . Summer total mold counts were dominated by high counts for the outdoor molds Cladosporium and Alternaria, and counts for these species correlated only weakly with the counts for the indoor molds Pencilliumand Aspergillus (data not shown) . We also observed that indoor Cladosporiummeasures were much higher in summer than in winter (median of 35,000 CFU/g in summer vs. 10,000 CFU/g in winter), while an opposite but weaker seasonal pattern was found for Aspergillus and Penicillium, supporting our notion that at least two different patterns of mold contamination of homes exist in the geographic area we studied. The latter two molds were more abundant in our winter samples. Our winter results did not change when we adjusted for summertime spore counts from the same households or when we adjusted for house dust mite allergens (results not shown), and our results were strengthened when we restricted the analyses to children living in the same home since birth, but sample size and statistical efficiency was limited for this and other types of subgroup analyses (e .g., multiple logistic regression models examining sensistization to specific instead of all allergens; data not shown) . As in our study, Garrett et al . (37) reported an elevated risk of general sensitization to allergens such as dust mites and dog allergens when they found high levels of viable Cladosporiumand Penicilliumspores in the air of homes in wintertime. Also similar to our results, these associations weakened when Garrett and co-workers instead used spore samples collected in late spring (37) . This may be related to the known seasonal variability of mold spores in outdoor air (i .e., in winter levels ofviable mold spore contamination in homes depend mostly on indoor factors because it is unlikely that spores are carried in from outdoors) . Molds and allergic symptoms. High indoor mold exposure (> 90th percentile) seems to contribute to allergic symptoms and diseases in both sensitized and nonsensitized children; however, because numbers in the nonsensitized group were small, effect estimates were imprecise or even nonestimable in this subgroup. This might suggest that both inflammatory allergic mechanisms, including type III allergy to mold-specific antigens and nonimmune inflammatory reactions to mold components, might be important (18) . It is not clear which inflammatory and/or allergic mechanisms primarily Environmental Health Perspectives " VOLUME 1101 NUMBER 7 1 July 2002 651

## Articles " Jacob et al .

account for the presumed pathogenic effects of mold exposure (18) . Nevertheless, allergic sensitization to mold spores plays a major role in atopy (14) . Existing studies suggest that exposure to allergens during a sensitive period in early life may enhance the risk of sensitization in genetically predisposed children (35), implying that for children with a positive family history, lower allergen concentrations may be sufficient to achieve sensitization (1) . We did not observe clear patterns for increased sensitization risk in children with a positive history of parental atopy (data not shown), but the number of children in this groupwas quite small (n = 56), and we sampled mold spores in homes only for children older than 5 years ofage. Sampling technique and identification methods. The presence of molds in indoor environments is generally assessed using air or surface samples (13) . Air sampling of viable mold particles usually is restricted to short periods of several hours and does not provide reliable data concerning the contamination by and growth of molds in nonindustrial indoor environments (34), especially because airborne samples are strongly influenced by outdoor levels of molds. High sampling variation has been observed for total airborne spore burden in repeated samples taken in the same home, possibly caused by domestic activity, cleaning, and ventilation (22) . Assessment of viable mold particles (mold propagules) in settled house dust might be a useful measure of longer-term and cumulative exposure to indoor molds and is less influenced by indoor activities and turbulence

. We used a simple, settled-dust sampling technique of standardized vacuuming of floor dust in the living roomto measure viable mold particles. To date, analysis of housedust samples to identify viable mold particles has not been standardized. Recently, a comparative study of 10 different analytic methods, however, showed that direct plating ofdust onto DG18 agar was one of the more sensitive methods (27) . In fact, use of DG18 agar produced higher numbers ofCFU for all mold spores. As an alternative to sampling mold spores, participants in previous studies of allergic and asthmatic diseases have often been asked to report dampness and odors as a surrogate for indoor mold exposures (14) . Awareness oftheexistence ofsuch exposures, however, may have caused overreporting of symptoms in exposed subjects and thus may have led to response bias. Furthermore, air sampling and cultivation of spores from house dust samples show only a modest agreement with such self-reported exposures (11,31~. In the present study, relying on dust samples avoided reporting biases. But 

### confounding bias may have occurred due to the fact that we included sensitized asthmatics in our case goup, and homes of asthmatics may be cleaned more rigorously to avoid symptoms. When we excluded fromour analyses 17 children who were both asthmatics and sensitized, our results did not change. We standardized our method of house dust sampling. We also believe that settled dust may be the best proxy for long-term exposures to mold allergens in the home environment . Furthermore, approximately 30%of all children for whom we collected samples had lived in the same home since birth and may have been exposed to high levels of mold throughout their Iives.To explore fully any exposure-response relation between allergic sensitization and exposure to indoor molds, it is necessary to recruit sufficient individuals with high and lowexposure levels. Although we found a wide range of CFUs per gramof dust in the homes of our study subjects, our overall sample size was relatively small and further reduced when we restricted our analyses to dust samples taken during wintertime to minimize the effect of seasonal variability in molds. 

## Conclusions Our results suggest that indoor mold spore exposure, mainly during winter, might increase the risk of sensitization to all allergens in children. These findings are limited by methodologic difficulties of quantifying molds and by the relatively small number of homes studied . For future research we encourage using a longitudinal study design with a larger number ofcases to allowanalyses for allergen-specific instead of total sensitization. However, we found that allergic sensitization was significantly associated with exposure to one or more genera of indoor mold spores, even after adjustment for house dust mite exposure. The effect strengthened when we restricted our study population to children who had lived in the same home since birth. Furthermore, our study suggests that high indoor spore counts might increase the prevalence of allergic symptoms in all children whether they are sensitized or not .

REFERENCES AND NOTES 1 . Warn U, Lau S, Bergmann R, Kulig M, Forster J, Bergmann K, Bauer CP, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I . Indoor allergen exposure is a risk factor far sensitization during the first three years of life. J Allergy Clin Immunol 99 :763-769119971

. 2 . Kuehr J, Frischer T, Meinert R, Barth R, Forster J, Schraub S, Urbanek R, Karmaus W . Mite allergen exposure is a risk factor for the incidence of specific sensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol94:44-52(1994) . 3 . Munir AKM, Kjellman NI, Bjorksten B . Exposure to indoor allergens in early infancyand sensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol 100

:177-181 119971

. 4. Sporik R, Squillance SP, Ingram JIM, Rakes G, Honsinger RW, Platts-Mills TAE. Mite, cat, and cockroach exposure, allergen sensitisation, and asthma in children: a case-control study ofthree schools. Thorax 54 :675-680 (1999). 5. Nelson HS, Szefler SJ, Jacobs J, Huss K, Shapiro G, Sternberg AL. The relationships among environmental allergen sensitization, allergen exposure, pulmonary function, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in the Childhood Asthma Management Program . J Allergy Clin Immunol 104

:775-785 (1999). 6. Eggleston PA, Rosenstreich D, Lynn H, Gergen P, Baker D, Kattan M, Mortimer KM, Mitchell H, Ownby D, Slavin R, Malveaux F. Relationship of indoor allergen exposure to skin test sensitivity in inner-city children with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunal 102:563-570 (1998) . 7. Verhoeff AP, Burge HA. Health risk assessment of fungi in home environments. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 78 :544-556 (1997). 8. Wickman M, Gravesen S, Nordvall SL, Pershagen G, Sundell J . Indoor viable dust-bound microfungi in relation to residential characteristics, living habits, and symptoms in atopic and control children J Allergy Clin Immunol 89:752-759(1992). 9. Lau S, Illi S, Sommerfeld C, Niggemann B, Bergmann R, Von Mutius E, Wahn U. Early exposure to house-dust mite and cat allergens and development of childhood asthma: a cohortstudy: Multicenter Allergy Study Group . Lancet 356

:1392-1397(2000) . 10. Platt SD, Martin CJ, Hunt SM, Lewis CW . Damp housing, mould growth, and symptomatic health state. Br Med J 298:1673-1678119891. 11 . Strachan DP, Falnningan B, McCabe EM, McGarry F. Quantification of airborne moulds in the homes of children with and withoutwheeze. Thorax 45 :382-387(1990) 12. Waegemaekers M, van Wageningen N, Brunekreef B, Boleij JS . Respiratory symptoms in damp homes: a pilot study. Allergy 44:192-198(1989) . 13. Peat JK, Dickerson J, Li J . Effects of damp and mould in the home on respiratory health: a reviewof the literature. Allergy 53

:120-128(1998) . 14. Verhoeff AP, van Strien FIT, van Wijnen JH, Brunekreef B . Damp housing and childhood respiratory symptoms: the role of sensitization to dust mites and molds. AmJ Epidemic] 141 :103-110 (1995) . 15. Dales RE, Miller D, McMullen ED. Indoor air quality and health: validity and determinants of reported home dampness and moulds. IntJ Epidemiol 26 :120-125 (1997) 16. Martin CJ, Platt SD, Hunt SM . Housing conditions and ill helath. Br Mad J 294

:1125-1127 (1987) . 17. Katz Y, Verleger H, Barr J, Rachmiel M, Kivity S, Kuttin ES. Indoor survey of moulds and prevalence of mould atopy in Israel . Clin Exp Allergy 29:186-192 (1999) . 18. Douwes J, van der Sluis B, Doekes G, van Leusden F, Wijands L, van Strien R, Verhoeff AP, Brunekreef B. Fungal extracellular polysaccharides in house dust as a marker for exposure to fungi : relation with culturable fungi, reported home dampness, and respiratory symptoms. J AllergyClin Immunol 103:494-500(1999) . 19. Heinrich J, Hoelscher B, Wjst M, Ritz B, Cyrus J, Wichmann HE. Respiratory diseases and allergies in two polluted areas in East Germany. Environ Health Perspect 107:53-62(1999) . 20 . Koch A, Heilemann KJ, Bischof W, Heinrich J, Wichmann HE. Indoor viable mold spores-a comparison between two cities, Erfurt (eastern Germany) and Hamburg (western Germany) . Allergy 55:176-180 (2000) . 21 . Bjornsson E, Norbsck D, Janson C. Asthmatic symptoms and indoor levels of micro-organisms and house dust mites. Clin Exp Allergy 25 :423-431119951. 22 . Verhoeff AP, van Wjinen JH, van Reenen-Hoekstra ES, Samson RA, van Strien FIT, Brunekreef B. Fungal propagules in house dust . II . Relation with residential characteristics and respiratory symptoms. Allergy 49:540-547 (1994) . 23. Su HJ, Rotnitzky A, Burge HA, Spengler JD. Examination of fungi in domestic interiors by using factor analsis: correlations and associations with home factors. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:181-186 (1992)~ 24. Wood RA, Eggleston PA, Lind P, Ingemann L, Schwartz B, Graveson S, Terry D, Wheeler B, Adkinson NF. Antigenic analysis of household dust samples. AmRev Respir Dis 137:358-363 (1988). 25. Richter K, Heinrich J, Bischof W . Innenraumfaktoren und Asthma bronchiale in Hamburg und Erfurt als Ted der INGA-Studie. Allergologie 22:14-2611999). 

## 652 VOLUME 1101 NUMBER 7 1 July 2002 

### " Environmental Health Perspectives

## Articles " Indoor exposure to molds and allergic sensitization

26 . Gross I, Heinrich J, Fahlbusch B, Jager L, Bischof W, Wichmann HE. Indoor determinants of der p 1 and der f 1 concentrations in house dust are different Clin Exp Allergy 30

:376-382(2000)

. 27. Verhoeff AP, van Reenen-Hoekstra ES, Samson RA, Brunekreef B, van Wjinen JH. Fungal propagules in house dust I . Comparison of analytic methods and their value as estimators of potential exposure. Allergy 49:533-53911994) 28. Nowak D, Heinrich J, Jorres R, Wassmer G, Berger J, Beck E, Boczor S, Slaussen M, Wichmann HE, Magnussen H. Prevalence of respiratory symptoms, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and atopy among adults west and east Germany. Eur Respir J 9 :2541-2552(1996) . 29. Liappris N. Evaluation of the Immuno CAP fluorescence enzyme immunoassay for determining total IgE and specific IgE antibodies. Allergo J 2(supp13) 133-134 (19931 . 30 . Corey JP. Environmental control of allergens. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 111 :340-347119941. 31 . Senkpiel K, KurowskiV, Ohgke H. Raumluftuntersuchungen schimmelpilzbelasteter Worm- und Aufenthaltsraume bei ausgewahlten Patienten mit Asthma bronchiale Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed 198:191-20311996) . 32 . Burr ML, Mulllns J, Merrett TG, Stott NCH. Indoor moulds and asthma. J R Soc Health 108 :99-101 (19881

. 33. D'Amato G, Spieksma FTM . Aerobiologic and clinical aspects of mould allergy in Europe Allergy 50 :870-877 (1995). 34 Verhoeff AP, van Wlinen JH, Brunekreef B, Flscher P, van Reenen-Hoekstra ES, Samson RA. Presence of viable mould propagules in indoor air in relationto house damp and outdoor air. Allergy 47:83-91 (1992) . 35 Gravesen S. Fungi as a cause of allergic disease. Allergy 34.135-154 (1979)_ 36 Warner JA, Little SA, Pollock I, LongbottomJL, Warner J0. The influence of exposure to house dust mite, cat, pollen and fungal allergens in the home on primary sensitization in asthma. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 1 :79-86 (1991) . 37 Garrett MH, Payment PR, Hooper MA, Abramson MJ, Hooper BM

. Indoor airborne fungal spores, house dampness and associations with environmental factors and respiratory health in children. Clin ExpAllergy 28 :459-467 (1998)

.



### Environmental Health Perspectives " VOLUME 1101 NUMBER 7 1 July 2002 

## 653