alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3033 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3033

   To extend to Nepal certain preferential treatment with respect to 
                           apparel articles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 5, 2003

  Mr. Walsh introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend to Nepal certain preferential treatment with respect to 
                           apparel articles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN TEXTILES AND APPAREL.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the preferential 
treatment extended to apparel articles under section 112(b)(3)(B) of 
the African Growth and Opportunity Act (19 U.S.C. 3721(b)(3)(B)) shall 
also apply to apparel articles that are imported directly into the 
customs territory of the United States from Nepal in accordance with 
the provisions set forth in such section as if such articles were 
articles of a lesser developed beneficiary sub-Saharan African country, 
if Nepal has satisfied the requirements set forth in section 113 of 
such Act (19 U.S.C. 3722), except that--
            (1) any reference in section 112(b) or section 113 of the 
        African Growth and Opportunity Act to a lesser developed 
        beneficiary sub-Saharan African country (or countries) shall be 
        treated as a reference to Nepal; and
            (2) such preferential treatment shall apply to apparel 
        articles imported into the customs territory of the United 
        States during the period beginning on October 1, 2003, and 
        ending on September 30, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
121 STAT. 222 PUBLIC LAW 110–32—JUNE 1, 2007

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1402:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):

Apr. 23, considered and passed House.

May 23, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 110–32

110th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 320 South

Lecanto Highway in Lecanto, Florida, as the ‘‘Sergeant Dennis J. Flanagan Lecanto

Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT DENNIS J. FLANAGAN LECANTO POST OFFICE

BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 320 South Lecanto Highway in Lecanto, Florida,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Dennis J. Flanagan

Lecanto Post Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Sergeant Dennis J. Flanagan Lecanto Post Office Building’’.

Approved June 1, 2007.

June 1, 2007

[H.R. 1402]
# Az Európai Unió C 402I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 402I |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 64. évfolyam2021. október 5. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 402I

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

64. évfolyam2021. október 5.

---

| Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Tájékoztatások |
| | AZ EURÓPAI UNIÓ INTÉZMÉNYEITŐL, SZERVEITŐL, HIVATALAITÓL ÉS ÜGYNÖKSÉGEITŐL SZÁRMAZÓ TÁJÉKOZTATÁSOK |
| | Számvevőszék |
| 2021/C 402 I/01 | 2/2021. sz. vélemény a 609/2014/EU, Euratom rendeletnek a tagállamok számára a kiszámíthatóság fokozása, valamint a tradicionális, a héa- és a GNI-alapú saját források rendelkezésre bocsátásakor alkalmazandó vitarendezési eljárások pontosítása érdekében történő módosításáról szóló tanácsi rendeletre irányuló bizottsági javaslatról (COM(2021) 327 final, 2021. június 25., 2021/0161 (NLE)) | 1 |

Tartalom

Oldal

IV   Tájékoztatások

AZ EURÓPAI UNIÓ INTÉZMÉNYEITŐL, SZERVEITŐL, HIVATALAITÓL ÉS ÜGYNÖKSÉGEITŐL SZÁRMAZÓ TÁJÉKOZTATÁSOK

Számvevőszék

2021/C 402 I/01

2/2021. sz. vélemény a 609/2014/EU, Euratom rendeletnek a tagállamok számára a kiszámíthatóság fokozása, valamint a tradicionális, a héa- és a GNI-alapú saját források rendelkezésre bocsátásakor alkalmazandó vitarendezési eljárások pontosítása érdekében történő módosításáról szóló tanácsi rendeletre irányuló bizottsági javaslatról (COM(2021) 327 final, 2021. június 25., 2021/0161 (NLE))

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

IV Tájékoztatások

AZ EURÓPAI UNIÓ INTÉZMÉNYEITŐL, SZERVEITŐL, HIVATALAITÓL ÉS ÜGYNÖKSÉGEITŐL SZÁRMAZÓ TÁJÉKOZTATÁSOK

Számvevőszék

| 2021.10.5. | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CI 402/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2021.10.5.

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CI 402/1

---

2/2021. sz. vélemény

a 609/2014/EU, Euratom rendeletnek a tagállamok számára a kiszámíthatóság fokozása, valamint a tradicionális, a héa- és a GNI-alapú saját források rendelkezésre bocsátásakor alkalmazandó vitarendezési eljárások pontosítása érdekében történő módosításáról szóló tanácsi rendeletre irányuló bizottsági javaslatról (COM(2021) 327 final, 2021. június 25., 2021/0161 (NLE))

(2021/C 402 I/01)

Az Európai Számvevőszék tudatja, hogy 2021. október 5-én megjelent a 609/2014/EU, Euratom rendeletnek a tagállamok számára a kiszámíthatóság fokozása, valamint a tradicionális, a héa- és a GNI-alapú saját források rendelkezésre bocsátásakor alkalmazandó vitarendezési eljárások pontosítása érdekében történő módosításáról szóló tanácsi rendeletre irányuló bizottsági javaslatról (COM(2021) 327 final, 2021. június 25., 2021/0161 (NLE)) szóló 2/2021. sz. véleménye.

A jelentés 2021. október 5-én, 17 órától elolvasható vagy letölthető a Számvevőszék weboldalán:

https://www.eca.europa.eu/hu/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=59435

---
### A v ena l po w e r p l ant t o: R9 A i rP e rm i ts 04 / 12/ 2011 10 : 51 PM P l ea s e re s pond t

o H i s t o r y: T h i s m e ss age ha s been f o r w a r ded.



### To whom it may concern, My name is Bianca Aranda and I'm a resident of Avenal. I'm outraged by the news of the Avenal Power Plant being dangerous to Avenal residents. It's unacceptable this power plant be exempt from the new air quality standards. Please take into consideration the harm that the air may do the residents. Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51619-51620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24033]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Federal Bureau of Investigation


Meeting of the CJIS Advisory Policy Board

AGENCY: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

ACTION: Meeting notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to announce the meeting of the 
Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Advisory Policy Board 
(APB). The CJIS APB is a Federal advisory committee established 
pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). This meeting 
announcement is being published as required by section 10 of the FACA.
    The CJIS APB is responsible for reviewing policy issues and 
appropriate technical and operational issues related to the programs 
administered by the FBI's CJIS Division, and thereafter, making 
appropriate recommendations to the FBI Director. The programs 
administered by the CJIS Division are the Integrated Automated 
Fingerprint Identification System, the Interstate Identification Index, 
Law Enforcement Online, National Crime Information Center, the National 
Instant Criminal Background Check System, the National Incident-Based 
Reporting System, Law Enforcement National Data Exchange, and Uniform 
Crime Reporting.
    The meeting will be open to the public on a first-come, first-
seated basis. Any member of the public wishing to file a written 
statement concerning the CJIS Division programs or wishing to address 
this session should notify Senior CJIS Advisor Roy G. Weise at (304) 
625-2730 at least 24 hours prior to the start of the session. The 
notification should contain the requestor's name, corporate 
designation, and consumer affiliation or government designation along 
with a short statement describing the topic to be addressed and the 
time needed for the presentation. A requestor will ordinarily be 
allowed no more than 15 minutes to present a topic.
    Dates and Times: The APB will meet in open session from 8:30 a.m. 
until 5 p.m., on December 2-3, 2009.

[[Page 51620]]


ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Hyatt Regency Savannah, 
Two West Bay Street, Savannah, Georgia, (912) 238-1234.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquiries may be addressed to Mrs. 
Barbara J. Ruckser; Management and Program Analyst; Advisory Groups 
Management Unit, Liaison, Advisory, Training and Statistics Section; 
FBI CJTS Division; Module C3; 1000 Custer Hollow Road; Clarksburg; West 
Virginia 26306-0149; telephone (304) 625-2163; facsimile (304) 625-
5090.

    Dated: September 21, 2009.
Roy G. Weise,
Senior CJTS Advisor, Criminal Justice Information Services Division, 
Federal Bureau of Investigation.
[FR Doc. E9-24033 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
#### § 269b.530 Briefs in support of the hearing officer's report.

Any party may file a brief in support of the hearing officer's report and recommendations subject to the same time limits and rules pertaining to filing exceptions and briefs in support thereof, as set forth in § 269b.520.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3104 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3104

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
   To provide for the establishment of separate campaign medals to be 
    awarded to members of the uniformed services who participate in 
Operation Enduring Freedom and to members of the uniformed services who 
                 participate in Operation Iraqi Freedom.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SEPARATE MILITARY CAMPAIGN MEDALS TO RECOGNIZE SERVICE IN 
              OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM AND SERVICE IN OPERATION IRAQI 
              FREEDOM.

    (a) Requirement.--The President shall establish a campaign medal 
specifically to recognize service by members of the uniformed services 
in Operation Enduring Freedom and a separate campaign medal 
specifically to recognize service by members of the uniformed services 
in Operation Iraqi Freedom.
    (b) Eligibility.--Subject to such limitations as may be prescribed 
by the President, eligibility for a campaign medal established pursuant 
to subsection (a) shall be set forth in regulations to be prescribed by 
the Secretary concerned (as defined in section 101 of title 10, United 
States Code). In the case of regulations prescribed by the Secretaries 
of the military departments, the regulations shall be subject to 
approval by the Secretary of Defense and shall be uniform throughout 
the Department of Defense.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7340
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM LEWIS HINSON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-258-P) Submitted: November 26, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Lewis Hinson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). In a criminal case, a defendant has ten days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). The district court may, upon a showing of excusable neglect, extend by thirty days the time for filing a notice of appeal. See United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 474 U.S. 857 (1985).The district court entered its order on March 8, 1996; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on Sept. 5, 1996. Appellant's failure to note an appeal within the ten-day appeal period and the thirty-day permissible extension period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. Wetherefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF METAL RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES INC. FOR ITS
FISCAL FIRST QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               2
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       31
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        291
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   324
<PP&E>                                           2,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,058
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              470
<PREFERRED>                                         44
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,450
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,762
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      313
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (326)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (326)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (326)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.014)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0 <F1>
<FN>
<F1> ANTI-DILUTIVE
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### §§ 217.213-217.299 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trans World Entertainment Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), we, Robert J. Higgins, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John J. Sullivan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:

| |  | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|

|/s/Robert J. Higgins                 | /s/John J. Sullivan         
|------------------------------------ | ----------------------------
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | Executive Vice President and
|                                     | Chief Financial Officer     
|                                     |                             
|September 7, 2006                    | September 7, 2006           

34

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
condensed  consolidated  balance sheet of Transnational  Industries,  Inc. as of
April 30, 2000 and the related  condensed  consolidated  statement of operations
and  statement of cash flows for the three months then ended and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                             309
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      943
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       2244
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4075
<PP&E>                                            2880
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2745
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         73
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                        3601
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7394
<SALES>                                           3002
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3002
<CGS>                                             2066
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   225
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    226
<INCOME-TAX>                                        14
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                212
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       212
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45


</TABLE>
#### UNITED BROS. OF F. AND SISTERS OF M. T. V. ROBERTS.

(Decided April 23, 1913.)

Appeal from Birmingham City Court.

Heard before Hon. John H. Miller.

H. H. Goldstein, for appellant. G. M. Edmonds, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Affirmed on certificate.
42737.

#### CITY OF ATLANTA v. RANSOM.

Hall, Judge.

The defendant city appeals from the judgment of the trial court overruling its motion for summary judgment in the plaintiff’s suit for alleged negligence of the city in maintenance of a public sidewalk. The petition alleged: The plaintiff was injured on a sidewalk constructed and maintained by and under the control of the city, when he stepped and fell at a place where there was a dangerous difference in the height of two concrete slabs of the sidewalk where they joined together. The plaintiff’s injuries and damages were caused by the city’s negligence in failing to keep and maintain its sidewalk in a reasonably safe condition, in failing to discover and remove the defect which had existed at least a year before the plaintiff was injured, in permitting the dangerous condition to exist when it had actual knowledge or should have known of its existence.

The purpose of considering the pleadings on summary judgment is to show the causes alleged in order that by comparison with the evidence it can be determined if the movant should prevail. *Crutcher v. Crawford Land Co.,*220 Ga. 298 (3) (138 SE2d 580); *Daniell v. Collins,*222 Ga. 1, 3 (148 SE2d 295). The evidence presented upon the motion for summary judgment showed without dispute that the sidewalk at the place where the plaintiff alleged he stepped and fell was not constructed and maintained by the city, but was constructed by Fulton County around 1950 adjoining the city sidewalk, and the line between the properties of the city and *721Fulton County was where the two sidewalks joined, and the city had never maintained or attempted to maintain the sidewalk on the county property.

*Felton, C. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*

Argued April 3, 1967

Decided May 9, 1967.

*Henry L. Bowden, Ferrin Y. Mathews,*for appellant.

*James 0. Goggins,*for appellee.

The evidence thus pierced the allegation of the petition that the plaintiff was injured on a sidewalk constructed and maintained by and under the control of the city, and showed that there was no genuine issue of material fact as to the cause of action raised by the petition. The trial court erred therefore in overruling the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

This is true even though the allegations of this petition might be amendable so as to set out a cause of action on another theory, upon which the evidence considered by the trial court would create a genuine issue as to the city’s liability. See *Zettler v. City of Atlanta,*66 Ga. 195; 19 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (3d Ed.) 214 et seq., 259 et seq., 343, §§ 54.67, 54.69, 54.80, 54.91. But see *Kesot v. City of Dalton,*94 Ga. App. 194 (94 SE2d 90).

*Judgment reversed.*