alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6433

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIE JAMES RICHARDSON, a/k/a Riz, a/k/a Raheem,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CR-97-121)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie James Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Willie James Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Release Records on Appeal.” We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Richardson, No. CR-97-121 (E.D. Va.

Feb. 24, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe effect of resin toughness and modulus on compressive failure modes of quasi-isotropic graphite/epoxy laminatesCompressive failure mechanisms in quasi-isotropic graphite/epoxy laminates were characterized for both unnotched and notched specimens and also following damage by impact. Two types of fibers (Thornel 300 and 700) and four resin systems (Narmco 5208, American Cyanamid BP907, and Union Carbide 4901/MDA and 4901/mPDA) were studied. For all material combinations, failure of unnotched specimens was initiated by kinking of fibers in the 0-degree plies. A major difference was observed, however, in the mode of failure propagation after the 0-degree ply failure. The strength of quasi-isotropic laminates in general increased with increasing resin tensile modulus. The laminates made with Thornel 700 fibers exhibited slightly lower compressive strengths than did the laminates made with Thornel 300 fibers. The notch sensitivity as measured by the hole strength was lowest for the BP907 resin and highest for the 5208 resin. For the materials studied, however, the type of fiber had no effect on the notch sensitivity.Document ID19860013176Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSohi, M. M.*(Washington Univ. St. Louis, Mo., United States)*Hahn, H. T.*(Washington Univ. St. Louis, Mo., United States)*Williams, J. G.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1986Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:87604NASA-TM-87604Accession Number86N22647Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 534-06-23-08Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860013176.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         310,944
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  618,747
<ALLOWANCES>                                    66,764
<INVENTORY>                                    126,764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,170,566
<PP&E>                                         765,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                 676,312
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,482,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          688,351
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,747,134
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,482,874
<SALES>                                      3,856,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,856,842
<CGS>                                        2,355,635
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,761,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (14,683)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 80,862
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,909
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             55,953
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                113,358
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   169,311
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02



</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Report**
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.AD 9/12:1/

Item Number:1049-L-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000603752
 
1980| 1982 | 1983 | 1985 | 1986 | 1989 | 1991 | 1993 | 2004 | 2005
 
March 4, 2020
#### § 380.30 Receivership administrative claims process.

The Corporation as receiver of a covered financial company shall determine claims against the covered financial company and the receiver of the covered financial company in accordance with the procedures set forth in 12 U.S.C. 5390(a)(2)-(5) and the regulations promulgated by the Corporation.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40649

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR CANTU-RIOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:03-CR-1073

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Oscar Cantu-Rios pleaded guilty to violating 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a) and (b) by being found in the United States, without

permission, following his conviction of an aggravated felony and

subsequent deportation. The district court sentenced him to

serve 46 months of imprisonment and two years of supervised

release.

For the first time on appeal, Cantu-Rios argues that the

“felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions set forth in 8 U.S.C.
No. 04-40649

-2-

§ 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), because they do not require

the fact of a prior felony or aggravated felony conviction to be

charged in the indictment and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. 

As Cantu-Rios concedes, his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

See United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). 

Cantu-Rios also argues for the first time on appeal that if

Almendarez-Torres is overruled, the Supreme Court’s holding in

Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), renders

unconstitutional the district court’s calculation of his sentence

under the United States Sentencing Guidelines based on facts

relating to his prior convictions that were neither found by a

jury beyond a reasonable doubt nor admitted by him. Cantu-Rios

concedes that in addition to the obstacle posed by

Almendarez-Torres, his argument regarding the effect of Blakely

is foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 465-66

(5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004)

(No. 04-5263), in which this court held that Blakely does not

extend to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3229 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3229

   To amend title 44, United States Code, to transfer to the Public 
 Printer the authority over the individuals responsible for preparing 
      indexes of the Congressional Record, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2003

  Mr. Ney (for himself and Mr. Larson of Connecticut) introduced the 
     following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 44, United States Code, to transfer to the Public 
 Printer the authority over the individuals responsible for preparing 
      indexes of the Congressional Record, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER TO PUBLIC PRINTER OF AUTHORITY OVER INDIVIDUALS 
              RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING CONGRESSIONAL RECORD INDEXES.

    (a) In General.--Section 902 of title 44, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 902. Congressional Record: Indexes
    ``The Public Printer shall prepare the semimonthly and the session 
index to the Congressional Record. The Joint Committee on Printing 
shall direct the form and manner of its publication and 
distribution.''.
    (b) Transition Rule for Current Employees.--
            (1) In general.--Any individual who is an employee of the 
        Congressional Record Index Office as of the effective date of 
        this Act shall be transferred to the Government Printing 
        Office, subject to the provisions of this title governing the 
        selection and appointment of employees of the Government 
        Printing Office and any applicable regulations.
            (2) Treatment of accrued leave.--Any annual and sick leave 
        accrued by such an individual prior to such date shall be 
        transferred and made available to the individual as an employee 
        of the Government Printing Office, subject to applicable 
        regulations of the Government Printing Office governing the use 
        of such leave.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall apply with 
respect to pay periods beginning on or after October 1, 2003 (or, if 
later, the first day of the first month which begins after the date of 
the enactment of this Act).
                                 <all>
```
§ 308.531 Location of hearing. ( a ) The hearing may be held: ( 1 ) In any judicial district of the United States in which the defendant resides or transacts business;
( 2 ) In any judicial district of the United States in which the claim or statement at issue was made; or
( 3 ) In such other place as may be agreed upon by the defendant and the ALJ.
( b ) Each party will have the opportunity to present argument with respect to the location of the hearing.
( c ) The hearing will be held at the place and at the time ordered by the ALJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          83,917
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   175
<PP&E>                                       1,537,687
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,633,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,764
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,578,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,633,416
<SALES>                                        666,170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,689
<CGS>                                          590,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  660,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                71,797
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (65,108)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (65,108)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (65,108)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (8.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (8.68)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (333-40027) on Form S-8 of Hybrid
Networks, Inc., of our report dated February 16, 2000, relating to the balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on
Form 10-K of Hybrid Networks, Inc.

/s/HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP

HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP Certified Public Accountants

Orange,
California
March 29, 2001

---

QuickLinks
SAFEGUARD HEALTH ENTERPRISES, INC.
                                  95 ENTERPRISE
                       ALISO VIEJO, CALIFORNIA 92656-2605


     NOTICE OF ADJOURNMENT AND RECONVENING OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
                       TO BE HELD WEDNESDAY, JUNE 20, 2001


TO  THE  STOCKHOLDERS  OF  SAFEGUARD  HEALTH  ENTERPRISES,  INC.:


PLEASE  BE  ADVISED  that  the  Annual  Meeting of the Stockholders of SafeGuard
Health  Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") held on May 23, 2001, was adjourned to
be  reconvened at the executive offices of the Company located at 95 Enterprise,
Aliso  Viejo,  California  92656-2605  on  Wednesday, June 20, 2001, at 4:00 pm,
Pacific  Daylight  Time.

The  Annual  Meeting  of  Stockholders was adjourned because the Company learned
that  a  number  of  beneficial  owners  of  Common Stock of the Company did not
receive the notice and proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in
a  timely  manner.  As  a  result,  even though a quorum of the stockholders was
present  at the Annual Meeting, the Company considered it appropriate to adjourn
the  Annual  Meeting of Stockholders to a later date so that all stockholders of
the  Company  are provided an adequate opportunity to vote their shares of stock
of  the  Company.  The  record date for, and purposes of the Annual Meeting have
not  changed.

You  are  cordially invited to attend the reconvened Annual Meeting.  Whether or
not  you plan to attend the reconvened Annual Meeting, please complete, sign and
return  the enclosed proxy card as soon as possible to ensure your participation
in  the meeting.  If you have already voted your shares of Common Stock by proxy
and  do  not  wish to change your vote, it is not necessary that you do anything
further  as your previously voted shares will be counted as voted by your proxy.


                                       By order of the Board of Directors,


                                       RONALD  I.  BRENDZEL
                                       Senior  Vice  President  and  Secretary


May  23,  2001




YOUR  VOTE  IS  IMPORTANT.  PLEASE  COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED
PROXY.  A  RETURN  ENVELOPE  THAT  REQUIRES  NO  POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE UNITED
STATES  HAS  BEEN  PROVIDED FOR YOUR USE.  RETURNING THE ENCLOSED PROXY WILL NOT
PREVENT  YOU FROM VOTING IN PERSON IF YOU CHOOSE TO ATTEND THE RECONVENED ANNUAL
MEETING  ON  JUNE  20,  2001.


<PAGE>
#### § 252.55 [Reserved]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 21-0005

IN RE THE MOTION OF ZACHARY W. DERR FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

# FILED SEP 21 2021 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Zachary W. Derr has filed a motion for admission to the Bar ofthe State ofMontana pursuant to RuleV ofthe Rules forAdmission, Admission onMotion. The BarAdmissions Administrator ofthe State Bar ofMontana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Derr has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, Zachary W. Derr may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contactingthe office ofthe Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. s-+ DATED this el day ofSeptember, 2021.

ChiefJustice 09/21/2021

Case Number: PR 21-0005Justices
8 Lufthansa 

Your reference 

U. S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building, Ground Floor, Room W-12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington DC 20590 

Re: Petition - Relief Requested 

To Whom It May Concern: 

Our reference/Date Telephone ext. 

October 23, 2015 

On behalf of Lufthansa German Airlines, I am seeking the authorization of the US 

Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration for an 

exemption as it relates to access to the flight deck on flights to, from or overflying the 

United States. Though there are specific requirements under CFR Title 14, Chapter 

1, Subchapter G, Part 129.28(d) (3) on which personnel are authorized access to the 

flight, it is our understanding that exemptions are made for the US aircraft operators 

CFR Title 14, Chapter 1, Subchapter G, Part 121 .547. Though Lufthansa does not 

operate under this provision or is the bearer of as a 119 Certificate holder, we are 

inquiring if as a foreign flag carrier a similar exemption can be made for limited 

specific members of Lufthansa's Executive Management Group. 

The list of Lufthansa Executives includes: 

• Harry Hohmeister- Chief Officer, Group Airlines & Logistics, Lufthansa Group 

• Karl Ulrich Gamardt - Chief Executive Officer, Lufthansa German Airlines 

This request is for the upcoming German Heritage Day, slated for 3/November 2015. 

Two members of our Executive Board will be on board LH flight 400, Frankfurt to JFK 

International Airport. Detailed information can be provided in each individual seeking 

this access for DOT/FAA vetting requirements. In addition, these individuals will hold 

a valid boarding pass for each specific flight and will undergo passenger vetting in 

accordance to the DHS Secure Flight Program. 

Please contact me at the address or telephone number below for answer any 

questions or concerns the US Dept. of Transportation or the Federal Aviation 

Administration shall have. My email address is: gary.cerra@dlh.de. 

;;; ::t~ ~~ry L. fderra 

Director of Security, North America 

cc: Robert L. Jaffe, Branch Manager, Eastern Region, FAA 

file 

Lufthansa German Airlines 

Corporate Secunty Department 

1640 Hempstead Turnpike 

Member of 

4 \lit'~ 

East Meadow, NY 11554 ... ~~ 

Telephone 516 296 9306 

Telefax 516 296 9303 

STAR ALLIANCE
§ 263.451 Definitions. As used in this subpart: ( a ) *Formal investigative proceeding* means an investigation conducted pursuant to an order of investigation as provided in § 263.452(a).
( b ) *Designated representative* means the person or persons empowered by the Board or by the General Counsel or his or her designees in accordance with 12 CFR 265.6 to conduct a formal investigative proceeding.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-10261

Conference Calendar

 

JOE ADRIAN DEL CASTILLO, III,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TOM BAKER, Texas Department

of Criminal Justice, State

Jail Division, Director,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:99-CV-858-Y

- - - - - - - - - -

June 13, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joe Adrian Del Castillo, III, Texas prisoner # 849460,

appeals from the dismissal as frivolous of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint. He contends that he has been denied credit for the

time he spent in official detention prior to his sentence and

that, as a result, he is being unlawfully detained beyond the

maximum term of his sentence. 

Castillo does not address the basis of the district court’s

decision, i.e., that his claim is not cognizable under Heck v.
No. 00-10261

-2-

Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). Because he fails to

identify any factual or legal error in the district court’s

opinion, he has failed to brief this issue for appeal adequately. 

Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy

Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Even if

Castillo had adequately preserved the issue, the claim is not

cognizable under Heck, as this court has applied Heck to suits

challenging the computation of a prisoner’s sentence. See McGrew

v. Texas Bd. of Pardons and Paroles, 47 F.3d at 158, 160-61 (5th

Cir. 1995); Jackson v. Vannoy, 49 F.3d 175, 177 (5th Cir. 1995). 

This appeal is without arguable merit and, thus, frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.

R. 42.2. We caution Castillo that both the district court’s and

this court’s dismissals count as “strikes” for purposes of 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388

(5th Cir. 1996). Once he accumulates three strikes, he may not

proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed

while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is

under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.