alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3027

To require the Federal Communications Commission to report to Congress 

regarding the ownership and control of broadcast stations used to serve 

language minorities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 5, 2003

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself and Mr. CONYERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To require the Federal Communications Commission to report to Congress regarding the ownership and control 

of broadcast stations used to serve language minorities, 

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Minority 

5 Media Opportunities Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BROADCAST OWNERSHIP. 

7 (a) REVIEW OF LICENSE TRANSFER.—Section 

8 211(b) of the Telecommunications Authorization Act of 
2

•HR 3027 IH 

1 1992 (Public Law 102–538; 106 Stat. 3545) is amended 

2 by adding at the end the following: ‘‘Subsection (a) also 

3 applies to any person holding a broadcast license used pri4 marily to serve a language minority. The hearing required 

5 by subsection (a) shall include record evidence, analysis, 

6 and Commission findings regarding the effects of the ap7 plication on competition and diversity in the programming 

8 and distribution markets for the specific language minor9 ity at issue. For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘lan10 guage minority’ means persons who are American Indian, 

11 Asian American, Alaskan Natives, or of Spanish herit12 age.’’. 

13 (b) BROADCAST STATIONS SERVING LANGUAGE MI14 NORITIES.—Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 

15 1996 (Public Law 104–104; 110 Stat. 111) is amended 

16 by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(i) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than January 

18 1, 2004, the Commission shall, after notice and comment, 

19 report to Congress regarding the ownership and control 

20 of broadcast stations (including AM, FM, and television 

21 broadcast stations) used to serve language minorities. The 

22 Commission shall consider the effects, with respect to both 

23 competition and diversity concerns, of multiple ownership 

24 and undue concentration in the programming and dis25 tribution markets specific to a language minority. For 
3

•HR 3027 IH 

1 purposes of this subsection, the term ‘language minority’ 

2 means persons who are American Indian, Asian American, 

3 Alaskan Natives, or of Spanish heritage.’’.

Æ
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134870 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134870 COA: 269035 Wayne CC: 04-008648-01 ROGER THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 26, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2007

Clerk
§ 229.56 Liability. ( a ) *Measure of damages* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this section or § 229.53, any person that breaches a warranty described in § 229.52 or fails to comply with any requirement of this subpart with respect to any other person shall be liable to that person for an amount equal to the sum of— ( i ) The amount of the loss suffered by the person as a result of the breach or failure, up to the amount of the substitute check; and
( ii ) Interest and expenses (including costs and reasonable attorney's fees and other expenses of representation) related to the substitute check.
( 2 ) *Offset of recredits.* The amount of damages a person receives under paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be reduced by any amount that the person receives and retains as a recredit under § 229.54 or § 229.55.
( 3 ) *Comparative negligence.* ( i ) If a person incurs damages that resulted in whole or in part from that person's negligence or failure to act in good faith, then the amount of any damages due to that person under paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be reduced in proportion to the amount of negligence or bad faith attributable to that person.
( ii ) Nothing in this paragraph (a)(3) reduces the rights of a consumer or any other person under the U.C.C. or other applicable provision of federal or state law.
( b ) *Timeliness of action.* Delay by a bank beyond any time limits prescribed or permitted by this subpart is excused if the delay is caused by interruption of communication or computer facilities, suspension of payments by another bank, war, emergency conditions, failure of equipment, or other circumstances beyond the control of the bank and if the bank uses such diligence as the circumstances require.
( c ) *Jurisdiction.* A person may bring an action to enforce a claim under this subpart in any United States district court or in any other court of competent jurisdiction. Such claim shall be brought within one year of the date on which the person's cause of action accrues. For purposes of this paragraph, a cause of action accrues as of the date on which the injured person first learns, or by which such person reasonably should have learned, of the facts and circumstances giving rise to the cause of action, including the identity of the warranting or indemnifying bank against which the action is brought.
( d ) *Notice of claims.* Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (d), unless a person gives notice of a claim under this section to the warranting or indemnifying bank within 30 calendar days after the person has reason to know of both the claim and the identity of the warranting or indemnifying bank, the warranting or indemnifying bank is discharged from liability in an action to enforce a claim under this subpart to the extent of any loss caused by the delay in giving notice of the claim. A timely recredit claim by a consumer under § 229.54 constitutes timely notice under this paragraph.
§ 5.60 Authority, scope, and exceptions to rules of general applicability. ( a ) *Authority.* 12 U.S.C. 56, 60, and 93a.
( b ) *Scope.* Except as otherwise provided, the restrictions in this subpart apply to the declaration and payment of all dividends by a national bank, including dividends paid in property. However, the provisions contained in § 5.64 do not apply to dividends paid in stock of the bank.
( c ) *Exceptions to the rules of general applicability.* Sections 5.8, 5.10, and 5.11 do not apply to this subpart.
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19826-1 Filed:01/18/22 Entered:01/19/22 16:28:56 Desc:

Exhibit Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                             AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO
                                ROCK-TENN COMPANY
                        1993 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
               (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1998)

         Pursuant to the power reserved in ss. 17 of the Rock-Tenn Company 1993
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended and restated effective January 1,
1998), Rock-Tenn Company hereby amends ss. 5 of the Plan to read as follows:

         "Stock Available for Options.

         One million shares of Stock shall (subject to shareholder approval) be
         added effective November 1, 2000 to the number of shares of Stock then
         available under this Plan. All such shares of Stock shall be available
         for purchase from Rock-Tenn upon the exercise of options granted under
         ss. 9 of this Plan, and any shares of Stock which are subject to
         options granted as of the first day of a Purchase Period but which are
         not purchased on the related Exercise Date shall again become available
         for purchase under this Plan."

         This Amendment Number One shall be effective November 1, 2000, but no
shares covered by this Amendment Number One shall be issued absent the approval
of this Amendment Number One by Rock-Tenn Company's shareholders at the 2001
Annual Meeting of such shareholders.

                                    ROCK-TENN COMPANY

                                    By:  /s/ Robert B. McIntosh
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                    Date:  October 27, 2000
                                          --------------------------------------
§ 308.545 Compromise or settlement. ( a ) Parties may make offers of compromise or settlement at any time.
( b ) The reviewing official has the exclusive authority to compromise or settle a case under this subpart at any time after the date on which the reviewing official is permitted to issue a complaint and before the date on which the ALJ issues an initial decision.
( c ) The Board has exclusive authority to compromise or settle a case under this subpart any time after the date on which the ALJ issues an initial decision, except during the pendency of any review under § 308.541 of this subpart or during the pendency of any action to collect penalties and assessments under § 308.542 of this subpart.
( d ) The Attorney General has exclusive authority to compromise or settle a case under this subpart during the pendency of any review under § 308.541 of this subpart or of any action to recover penalties and assessments under 31 U.S.C. 3806.
( e ) The investigating official may recommend settlement terms to the reviewing official, the Board, or the Attorney General, as appropriate. The reviewing official may recommend settlement terms to the Board, or the Attorney General, as appropriate.
( f ) Any compromise or settlement must be in writing.
§ 4.38 Restrictions on dissemination of released information. ( a ) *Records.* The OCC may condition a decision to release non-public OCC information on entry of a protective order by the court or administrative tribunal presiding in the particular case or, in non-adversarial matters, on a written agreement of confidentiality. In a case in which a protective order has already been entered, the OCC may condition approval for release of non-public OCC information upon the inclusion of additional or amended provisions in the protective order. The OCC may authorize a party who obtained records for use in one case to provide them to another party in another case.
( b ) *Testimony.* The OCC may condition its authorization of deposition testimony on an agreement of the parties to appropriate limitations, such as an agreement to keep the transcript of the testimony under seal or to make the transcript available only to the parties, the court, and the jury. Upon request or on its own initiative, the OCC may allow use of a transcript in other litigation. The OCC may require the requester, at the requester's expense, to furnish the OCC with a copy of the transcript. The OCC employee whose deposition was transcribed does not waive his or her right to review the transcript and to note errors.
[60 FR 57322, Nov. 15, 1995. Redesignated at 63 FR 62929, Nov. 10, 1998]
<PAGE>

                        [SkyAuction.com, Inc. Letterhead)

                            PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

                               As of April 1, 2000


Derek Reisfield
c/o i-Hatch Ventures
599 Broadway, 11th floor
NY, NY 10012

Dear Derek:

         SkyAuction.com, Inc. (the "Company") is happy to offer you a position
as Vice Chairman of its Board of Directors. We are happy that you can join our
team and assist us in the development of our company.

         As Vice Chairman of the Company you shall assist in the coordination
and management of the activities and process in connection with the initial
public offering of the Company's common stock (or any other securities) (the
"IPO") including communication with underwriters, auditors, legal counsel and
Company personnel.

         As full compensation for all services provided and duties performed by
you during your engagement by the Company as Vice Chairman, you will be entitled
to receive: (i) a Consulting Fee of $10,000 per month, commencing as of April 1,
2000, payable monthly and otherwise in accordance with the Company's normal
payroll practices and continuing until the earlier of March 31, 2001 or the
completion of the IPO or the sale of all or substantially all of the shares or
the assets of the Company to any nonaffiliated party (the "Sale"); and (ii) upon
completion of the IPO or the Sale, a bonus of $20,000 for every month for which
you were entitled to the Consulting Fee, as provided above.

         Please confirm your agreement with the foregoing by signing and
returning to us at least two copies of this letter.

                                             Sincerely,

                                             SKYAUCTION.COM, INC.

                                             By: /s/ Michael N. Hering
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Michael N. Hering
                                                President & CEO

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

/s/ Derek Reisfield
----------------------
Derek Reisfield
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 07/25/2014

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: 111d Discussion Call with the State of Colorado held on 07/10/2014

SUMMARY: 

EPA Headquarters and Region 8 staff discussed various questions on the proposed Clean Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants with the State of Colorado goal on 07/10/2014. The Clean Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA HQ: Travis Johnson

EPA Region 8: Laura Farris, Mark Komp

Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment: Dena Wojtach, Curtis Taipale

ATTACHMENTS

Discussion Questions
### Aeroradioactivity maps in heavy-mineral exploration: Charleston, South Carolina, area

By: E. R. ForceA. E. GroszP. J. LoferskiA.H. Maybin

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1218

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Utility of aeroradioactivity maps in the vicinity of Charleston, South Carolina(1978)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 269.7 Approval of agreement and required contents.

Any agreement entered into with a labor organization as the exclusive representative of employees in a unit must be approved by the President of the Bank or a designated officer representative. All agreements with labor organizations shall also be subject to the requirement that the administration of all matters covered by the agreement shall be governed by the provisions of applicable laws and Federal Reserve System rules and regulations, and the agreement shall at all times be applied subject to such laws and regulations.
#### § 269b.444 Objection to conduct of hearing; other motions during hearing.

Any objection with respect to the conduct of the hearing, including any objection to the introduction of evidence, or any other motion during the course of the hearing, including a request to allow intervention, may be stated orally or in writing accompanied by a short statement of the grounds for such objection, and included in the record. No such objection shall be deemed waived by further participation in the hearing and such objection shall not stay the conduct of the hearing. Automatic exceptions will be allowed to all adverse rulings and shall be considered by the panel upon its review of the hearing officer's report and recommendations, if exception to the ruling is included in a statement of exceptions submitted to the panel after the close of the hearing, subject to the requirements of § 269b.520.
#### SPANN V. THE STATE.

(Decided June 19, 1913.)

Appeal from Geneva Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. 1-1. A. Pearce.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell,. Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Walker, P. J. —

No error in the record and the causéis affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 91 (Monday, May 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 27030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10817]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8727]

In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of al-Qa'ida in 
the Islamic Maghreb (and Other Aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist 
Organization Pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled pursuant 
to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as 
amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in consultation with 
the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that 
the circumstances that were the basis for the 2009 decision to maintain 
the designation of the aforementioned organization as a Foreign 
Terrorist Organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant 
revocation of the designation and that the national security of the 
United States does not warrant a revocation of the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 1, 2014.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-10817 Filed 5-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000901175
<NAME> SYNTHETIC INDUSTRIES LP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             287
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,965
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,714
<INVENTORY>                                     52,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,632
<PP&E>                                         326,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                 108,196
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 439,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,030
<BONDS>                                        236,843
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   439,851
<SALES>                                        368,996
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               368,996
<CGS>                                          246,677
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   729
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,515
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,451
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,855
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,596
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,429
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 404.1 General provisions. ( a ) *Purpose.* This subpart contains the rules that the Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM) follows in processing requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. This subpart should be read in conjunction with the text of the FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB Guidelines).
( b ) *Scope.* Requests made by individuals for records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed in accordance with EXIM's Privacy Act regulations in subpart B of this part as well as under this subpart.
( c ) *Delegation.* Any action or determination in this subpart which is the responsibility of a specific EXIM employee may be delegated.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.67

                        EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT

     WHEREAS, Incara Pharmaceuticals Corporation (the "Company") and Richard W.
Reichow (the "Employee") entered into an Employment Agreement dated November 16,
1998 (the "Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, the Agreement provides for the renewal of the Agreement for one
year periods by mutual written agreement;

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee wish to amend the Agreement;

     NOW THEREFORE, effective as of May 1, 2001, the parties agree to extend the
term of the Agreement under the same terms and conditions for a one year period
through April 30, 2002. The remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of
May 1, 2001.


INCARA PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION


By: /s/ Clayton I. Duncan                         /s/ Richard W. Reichow
    ---------------------------------------       ------------------------------
Name:  Clayton I. Duncan                          RICHARD W. REICHOW
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer