alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### National Seismic-Hazard Maps: Documentation June 1996

By: Arthur D. Frankel**Charlies S. MuellerTheodore P. BarnhardDavid M. PerkinsE. V. LeyendeckerNancy DickmanStanley L. HansonMargaret G. Hopper

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr96532

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Cuyahoga Circuit Court,

January Term, 1893.]

#### BERNSDORF & SAYLOR v. GEORGE J. HARDWAY ET AL.

For opinion in this case see 6 Ohio Circ. Dec., 171.
§ 304.12 Definitions. ( a ) *Covered depository institution* means an insured depository institution, as such term is defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1813, for which the Corporation is the appropriate Federal banking agency and that meets all of the following criteria: ( 1 ) Has less than $5 billion in total consolidated assets as reported in its report of condition for the second calendar quarter of the preceding year;
( 2 ) Has no foreign offices, as defined in this section;
( 3 ) Is not required to or has not elected to use 12 CFR part 324, subpart E, to calculate its risk-based capital requirements;
( 4 ) Is not a large institution or highly complex institution, as such terms are defined in 12 CFR 327.8, or treated as a large institution, as requested under 12 CFR 327.16(f); and
( 5 ) Is not a state-licensed insured branch of a foreign bank, as such terms are defined in section 3(s) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1813(s).
( 6 ) In determining whether an insured depository institution meets the asset threshold in paragraph (1) of the definition of “covered depository institution” in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, for purposes of a report required to be submitted for calendar year 2021, an insured depository institution may refer to the lesser of its total consolidated assets as reported in its report of condition as of December 31, 2019, and its total consolidated assets as reported in its report of condition for the second calendar quarter of 2020.
( b ) *Foreign country* refers to one or more foreign nations, and includes the overseas territories, dependencies, and insular possessions of those nations and of the United States.
( c ) *Foreign office* means: ( 1 ) A branch or consolidated subsidiary in a foreign country, unless the branch is located on a U.S. military facility;
( 2 ) An international banking facility as such term is defined in 12 CFR 204.8;
( 3 ) A majority-owned Edge Act or Agreement subsidiary including both its U.S. and its foreign offices; and
( 4 ) For an institution chartered or headquartered in any U.S. state or the District of Columbia, a branch or consolidated subsidiary located in a U.S. territory or possession.
( d ) *Report of condition* means the FFIEC 031, FFIEC 041, or FFIEC 051 versions of the Consolidated Report of Condition and Income (Call Report) or the FFIEC 002 (Report of Assets and Liabilities of U.S. Branches and Agencies of Foreign Banks), as applicable, and as they may be amended or superseded from time to time in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.
( e ) *Total consolidated assets* means total assets as reported in an insured depository institution's report of condition.
[84 FR 29052, June 21, 2019, as amended at 85 FR 77363, Dec. 2, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          83,103
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  131,476
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               214,579
<PP&E>                                          56,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,418,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          337,933
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    138,500
<COMMON>                                       239,594
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,418,261
<SALES>                                      1,480,906
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,480,906
<CGS>                                        1,027,971
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  621,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (156,635)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 11,826
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (156,635)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.033)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.033)







</TABLE>
§ 366.0 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) The word *person* refers to an individual, corporation, partnership, or other entity with a legally independent existence.
( b ) The terms *we, our,* and *us* refer to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), except when acting as conservator or operator of a bridge bank.
( c ) The terms *I, me, my, mine, you,* and *yourself* refer to a person who submits an offer to perform or performs, directly or indirectly, contractual services or functions on our behalf.
( d ) The phrase *insured depository institution* refers to any bank or savings association whose deposits are insured by the FDIC.
427 A.2d 248

#### Commonwealth v. Dennis, Appellant.

Submitted November 16,1979.

John R. Hoye, Jr., for appellant;

Gerald R. Solomon, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before SPAETH, HOFFMAN and VAN der VOORT, JJ.

The judgment of sentence of the lower court is hereby affirmed.
First Amendment to that Credit Agreement
                        Dated as of April 2, 1999 Between
                        Main Street and Main Incorporated
                                       and
                                  Imperial Bank

This  First  Amendment  ("Amendment  ") dated as of  August  2, 1999 is made and
entered between Main Street and Main Incorporated ("Borrower") and Imperial Bank
("Bank"). This Amendment amends that Credit Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as
of April 2, 1999,  by and  between  Borrower  and Bank,  All  capitalized  terms
herein, unless otherwise defined herein, shall have the meaning set forth in the
Agreement.

Now therefore, the parties hereby agree as follows,

1. Amendments.

     A.   Section 1.01 (a) of the  Agreement is hereby  stricken in its entirety
          and replaced as follows.

          REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT.  Subject to the terms and conditions of this
          Agreement,  provided that in no event of default then has occurred and
          is  continuing,  Bank shall,  upon  Borrower's  request make  advances
          ("Revolving Loans") to Borrower, for general corporate purposes, in an
          amount not to exceed $5,000,000 (the "Revolving Line of Credit") until
          July  15,  2000  (the  "Revolving  Line  of  Credit  Maturity  Date")_
          Revolving  Loans  may be  repaid  and  reborrowed,  provided  that all
          outstanding  principal  and accrued  interest on the  Revolving  Loans
          shall be payable in full on the Revolving Credit Maturity Date.

     B.   Section 4.08 of the  Agreement is hereby  stricken in its entirety and
          replaced as follows:

          ACCESS TO  CAPITAL.  Maintain at all times an  agreement  with a third
          party  insuring  that the Company  has access to long term  capital in
          excess of eight million dollars ($8,000,000).

3. Except as provided above,  the Agreement  remains  unchanged and  the parties
hereby  confirm that the Agreement as herein  amended  remains in full force and
effect.

Imperial Bank                           Main Street & Main Incorporated

By: /s/ Clifford A. Payson              By: /s/ James Yeager
   -------------------------------         -------------------------------------
   Clifford A. Payson                      James Yeager
Title: Vice President                   Title: Vice President Finance
#### § 607.1 Purpose and scope.

The regulations in part 607 implement the provisions of section 5.15 of the Farm Credit Act of 1971, 12 U.S.C. 2001 *et seq.* (Act) relating to Farm Credit Administration (FCA) assessments. The regulations prescribe the procedures for the equitable apportionment of FCA annual administrative expenses and necessary reserves among Farm Credit System (System) institutions. Pursuant to section 5.15(a) of the Act, the regulations also provide for the separate assessment of the FCA's costs of supervising and examining the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (FAMC). The regulations further provide for the reimbursement of expenses incurred in performing statutorily required examinations of non-System entities.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 38

 40

 42

▲ ★

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00138-CR

CRYSTAL MASON, Appellant

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

On Appeal from 432nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1485710D) 

March 28, 2024

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

(p)

JUDGMENT ON REMAND

This appeal is on remand from the Court of Criminal Appeals. 

This court has again considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. We reverse the trial court’s judgment 

and render a judgment of acquittal.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell 

 Justice Wade Birdwell
§ 307.1 Scope and purpose. ( a ) *Scope.* This Part applies to all insured depository institutions, as defined in section 3(c)(2) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act) (12 U.S.C. 1813(c)(2)).
( b ) *Purpose.* This Part sets forth the rules governing: ( 1 ) The time and manner for providing certification to the FDIC regarding the assumption of all of the deposit liabilities of an insured depository institution by one or more insured depository institutions; and
( 2 ) The notification that an insured depository institution shall provide its depositors when a depository institution's insured status is being voluntarily terminated without its deposits being assumed by one or more insured depository institutions.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6360** 

KEITH ERVIN FRAZ I ER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Fox , Senior District Judge. ( 5:13

- hc

- 02010

- F )

Submitted : July 30, 2015 Decided: August 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Keith Ervin Frazier, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Keith Ervin Frazier seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order s dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e ) motion for reconsideration. The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) ; Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrati ng that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court de nies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.3 We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Frazier has not made the requisite showing. * Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

* Because Frazier ’ s informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s dispositions, but instead argues the merits of his petition, Frazier has forfeited appellate review of the court’s orders. See 4th Cir. R. 34( b).
# C_2020365EN.01000701.xml

| 29.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/7

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2020/C 365/07)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 16 July 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85354 |
| Decision No | 092/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title | COVID-19 Amendments and prolongation of the compensation scheme for the cancellation of sports and volunteer events |
| Legal basis | The national legal framework for the scheme is set out in the Regulation on a temporary compensation scheme for the volunteer- and sports sector due to the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | The objective of the scheme is to compensate for eligible losses caused by the cancellation or postponement of sports and volunteer events to combat the spread of the COVID-19 virus. |
| Form of aid | Grants |
| Budget | NOK 1,87 billion |
| Duration | Until 15.9.2020 |
| Economic sectors | Sport and voluntary sector |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Norwegian Gaming and Foundation Authority |
| P.O.Box 800 |
| NO-6805 Førde |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

16 July 2020

Case No

85354

Decision No

092/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title

COVID-19 Amendments and prolongation of the compensation scheme for the cancellation of sports and volunteer events

Legal basis

The national legal framework for the scheme is set out in the Regulation on a temporary compensation scheme for the volunteer- and sports sector due to the COVID-19 outbreak

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

The objective of the scheme is to compensate for eligible losses caused by the cancellation or postponement of sports and volunteer events to combat the spread of the COVID-19 virus.

Form of aid

Grants

Budget

NOK 1,87 billion

Duration

Until 15.9.2020

Economic sectors

Sport and voluntary sector

Name and address of the granting authority

The Norwegian Gaming and Foundation Authority

P.O.Box 800

NO-6805 Førde

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            2523
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      185
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2708
<PP&E>                                           12166
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5414
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    9497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              855
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        8642
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      9497
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7419
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   838
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   650
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4350
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4350
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4350
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    23.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    23.45
        

</TABLE>
§ 308.28 Interlocutory review. ( a ) *General rule.* The Board of Directors may review a ruling of the ALJ prior to the certification of the record to the Board of Directors only in accordance with the procedures set forth in this section and § 308.23.
( b ) *Scope of review.* The Board of Directors may exercise interlocutory review of a ruling of the ALJ if the Board of Directors finds: ( 1 ) The ruling involves a controlling question of law or policy as to which substantial grounds exist for a difference of opinion;
( 2 ) Immediate review of the ruling may materially advance the ultimate termination of the proceeding;
( 3 ) Subsequent modification of the ruling at the conclusion of the proceeding would be an inadequate remedy; or
( 4 ) Subsequent modification of the ruling would cause unusual delay or expense.
( c ) *Procedure.* Any request for interlocutory review must be filed by a party with the ALJ within ten days of the ruling and must otherwise comply with § 308.23. Any party may file a response to a request for interlocutory review in accordance with § 308.23(d). Upon the expiration of the time for filing all responses, the ALJ will refer the matter to the Board of Directors for final disposition.
( d ) *Suspension of proceeding.* Neither a request for interlocutory review nor any disposition of such a request by the Board of Directors under this section suspends or stays the proceeding unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ or the Board of Directors.
§ 5.61 Definitions. For the purposes of subpart E, the following definitions apply: ( a ) *Capital stock, capital surplus,* and *permanent capital* have the same meaning as set forth in § 5.46.
( b ) *Retained net income* means the net income of a specified period less the total amount of all dividends declared in that period.
#### § 608.801 Authority.

The regulations of this part are issued under the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended by the Debt Collection Act of 1982, 31 U.S.C. 3701-3719 and 5 U.S.C. 5514, and in conformity with the joint regulations issued under that Act by the General Accounting Office and the Department of Justice (joint regulations) prescribing standards for administrative collection, compromise, suspension, and termination of agency collection actions, and referral to the General Accounting Office and to the Department of Justice for litigation of civil claims for money or property owed to the United States (4 CFR parts 101-105).