alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 21.1



                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY *


         Ivex Packaging Corporation, a Delaware corporation, owns all of the
outstanding capital stock of IPC, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which owns all
of the outstanding capital stock of the following:

     1.  Packaging Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation

     2.  Ivex Corporation, an Ontario corporation, which owns all of the
         outstanding capital stock of:

               (i)   M & R Plastics Inc., a Quebec corporation, which owns all
                     of the outstanding capital stock of:

                    (a) M&R Plastics Canada, Inc., an Ontario corporation
                    (b) 2528-5347 Quebec Inc., a Quebec corporation

     3.  Kama of Illinois Corporation, a Delaware corporation

     4.  Valley Express Lines, Inc., a Delaware corporation

     5.  Ivex Paper Mill Corporation, a Delaware corporation

     6.  IPMC Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation, which owns all of the
         outstanding capital stock of:

               (i)   IPMC, Inc., a Delaware corporation

     7.  Trio Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation

     8.  Ivex Holdings, Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of England
         and Wales, which owns all of the outstanding capital stock of:

               (i)   Kama Europe Limited, a corporation organized under the laws
                     of England and Wales 

               (ii)  Ivex Packaging Continental, S.A., a societe anonyme
                     organized under the laws of France

     9.  CFI Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which owns all of the
         outstanding capital stock of:

               (i)   Plastofilm Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which
                     owns all of the outstanding stock of

                    (a) Crystal Thermoplastics, Inc., a Rhode Island corporation
                    (b) Plastofilm P.R., Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation

               (ii)  CFI Recycling, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

               (iii) Plastofilm Limited, a Northern Ireland corporation

     10. Ultra Pac, Inc., a Minnesota corporation

     11. Bleyer Acquisition, Inc., a Delaware corporation

     12. Ivex de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a corporation organized under the laws of
         Mexico


     ------------- 
     * Certain of these legal entities also do business under the names of
       Ivex and Kama
§ 3.30 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart sets forth methodologies for determining risk-weighted assets for purposes of the generally applicable risk-based capital requirements for all national banks or Federal savings associations.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, a market risk national bank or Federal savings association must exclude from its calculation of risk-weighted assets under this subpart the risk-weighted asset amounts of all covered positions, as defined in subpart F of this part (except foreign exchange positions that are not trading positions, OTC derivative positions, cleared transactions, and unsettled transactions).
#### § 4.66 Oversight and monitoring.

The Deputy Comptroller for Resource Management shall appoint an Outreach Program Manager, who shall appoint an Outreach Program Specialist. The Outreach Program Manager is primarily responsible for program advocacy, oversight and monitoring.
§ 323.1 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* This subpart is issued under 12 U.S.C. 1818, 1819(a)(Seventh and Tenth), 1831p-1 and title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA) (Pub. L. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183, 12 U.S.C. 3331 *et seq.* (1989)).
( b ) *Purpose and scope.* ( 1 ) title XI provides protection for federal financial and public policy interests in real estate related transactions by requiring real estate appraisals used in connection with federally related transactions to be performed in writing, in accordance with uniform standards, by appraisers whose competency has been demonstrated and whose professional conduct will be subject to effective supervision. This subpart implements the requirements of title XI and applies to all federally related transactions entered into by the FDIC or by institutions regulated by the FDIC (*regulated institutions*).
( 2 ) This subpart: ( i ) Identifies which real estate-related financial transactions require the services of an appraiser;
( ii ) Prescribes which categories of federally related transactions shall be appraised by a State certified appraiser and which by a State licensed appraiser; and
( iii ) Prescribes minimum standards for the performance of real estate appraisals in connection with federally related transactions under the jurisdiction of the FDIC.
[55 FR 33888, Aug. 20, 1990, as amended at 80 FR 32684, June 9, 2015; 83 FR 15036, Apr. 9, 2018]
§ 408.1 Background. ( a ) The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*) establishes national policies and goals for the protection of the environment. Section 102(2) of NEPA contains certain procedural requirements directed toward the attainment of such goals. In particular, all Federal agencies are required to give appropriate consideration to the environmental effects of their proposed actions in their decision-making and to prepare detailed environmental statements on recommendations or reports on proposals for legislation and other major Federal Actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
( b ) Executive Order 11991 of May 24, 1977, directed the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to issue regulations to implement the procedural provisions of NEPA (NEPA Regulations). Accordingly, CEQ issued final NEPA Regulations which are binding on all Federal agencies as of July 30, 1979 (40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508) on November 29, 1979. These Regulations provide that each Federal agency shall as necessary adopt implementing procedures to supplement the NEPA Regulations. Section 1507.3(b) of the NEPA Regulations identifies those sections of the NEPA Regulations which must be addressed in agency procedures.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Access to EducationCompliance (Legal)DisabilitiesDisadvantaged YouthEducational ImprovementEducational PolicyExceptional PersonsFederal LegislationFederal State RelationshipGovernment RoleJob TrainingPolicy FormationPostsecondary EducationProgram EffectivenessProgram ImplementationProgram ImprovementSecondary EducationVocational Education

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### Mary Lambert, as Administratrix, Etc., Plaintiff, *v.*The Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

January, 1901.)

Administrator — Unless authorized to collect, cannot issue execution.

An administratrix having power from the Surrogate’s Court to prosecute but no power to collect, has no right to issue execution on a recovery by action and the execution is irregular.

The fact that she subsequently obtained from said court full power to collect cannot make the execution regular.

Application to vacate .am. execution.

Jacob Marks, for plaintiff.

Henry A. Robinson, for defendant.

Blanchard, J.

This is an application to vacate an execution on the ground that at the time of the issuance thereof the plaintiff was an administratrix "with but limited powers, having po-wer to “ prosecute,” but not power “to collect or compromise.” After this motion was made, but before its submission, plaintiff obtained from the Surrogate’s Court full power of collection. By placing the execution in the hands of the sheriff, plaintiff clearly exceeded her authority, conferred upon her by .the Surrogate’s Court. She thereby, in effect, constituted the sheriff her agent in the collection of her judgment. Her action in subsequently obtaining the necessary .power of collection did not remedy the. defect existing when the execution was issued. Even if the issuance of the execution be not void, it was certainly irregular, and should he vacated.

Execution vacated.
#### Carolina P. Crawford, Respondent, *v.*Hugo Jaeckel, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, tenth district, borough of Manhattan.

L. P. Mingey, for appellant.

Adams *&*Adams, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. See Wilkinson v. Davies, 146 N. Y. 27.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 14

- 00874

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R .H., M.D.J., AND M.K ., CHILDREN
Appeal from the 300th District Court of Brazoria County. (Tr. Ct. No. No. 74587 ).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on October 17, 2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, D.K., pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered July 28 , 2015

.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale . Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Radack.
#### § 308.200 Scope.

The rules and procedures set forth in this subpart apply to FDIC-supervised institutions and senior executive officers and directors of the same that are subject to the provisions of section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (section 38) (12 U.S.C. 1831o) and subpart H of part 324 of this chapter. For purposes of this subpart, the term “FDIC-supervised institution” means any insured depository institution for which the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is the appropriate Federal banking agency pursuant to section 3(q) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1813(q).
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Bill D. Stewart, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Naturade, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 28, 2006                                 /s/      Bill D. Stewart        Bill D. Stewart        *Chief Executive Officer*  48
# C_2016195EN.01000801.xml

| 2.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/8

---

Information notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority based on Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(2016/C 195/06)

| Member State | Norway |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Routes between Kirkenes, Vadsø, Vardø, Båtsfjord, Berlevåg, Mehamn, Honningsvåg, Hammerfest and Alta
  Hasvik – Tromsø v.v., Hasvik – Hammerfest v.v., Sørkjosen – Tromsø v.v.
  Lakselv – Tromsø v.v.
  Andenes – Bodø v.v., Andenes – Tromsø v.v.
  Harstad/Narvik – Tromsø v.v.
  Leknes – Bodø v.v., Svolvær – Bodø v.v.
  Røst – Bodø v.v.
  Brønnøysund – Bodø v.v., Brønnøysund – Trondheim v.v.
  Sandnessjøen – Bodø v.v., Sandnessjøen – Trondheim v.v.
  Mo i Rana – Bodø v.v., Mo i Rana – Trondheim v.v.
  Mosjøen – Bodø v.v., Mosjøen – Trondheim v.v.
  Namsos – Trondheim v.v., Rørvik – Trondheim v.v. |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1 April 2017 – 31 March 2022 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 8 August 2016 |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained | Ministry of Transport and Communications |
| PO Box 8010 Dep |
| N-0030 OSLO |
| NORWAY |
| Tel. +47 22248353 |
| postmottak@sd.dep.no |
| https://www.regjeringen.no/en/find-document/id2000006/?documenttype=dokumenter/anbud |

Member State

Norway

Concerned routes

Routes between Kirkenes, Vadsø, Vardø, Båtsfjord, Berlevåg, Mehamn, Honningsvåg, Hammerfest and Alta

Hasvik – Tromsø v.v., Hasvik – Hammerfest v.v., Sørkjosen – Tromsø v.v.

Lakselv – Tromsø v.v.

Andenes – Bodø v.v., Andenes – Tromsø v.v.

Harstad/Narvik – Tromsø v.v.

Leknes – Bodø v.v., Svolvær – Bodø v.v.

Røst – Bodø v.v.

Brønnøysund – Bodø v.v., Brønnøysund – Trondheim v.v.

Sandnessjøen – Bodø v.v., Sandnessjøen – Trondheim v.v.

Mo i Rana – Bodø v.v., Mo i Rana – Trondheim v.v.

Mosjøen – Bodø v.v., Mosjøen – Trondheim v.v.

Namsos – Trondheim v.v., Rørvik – Trondheim v.v.

Period of validity of the contract

1 April 2017 – 31 March 2022

Deadline for submission of tenders

8 August 2016

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained

Ministry of Transport and Communications

PO Box 8010 Dep

N-0030 OSLO

NORWAY

Tel. +47 22248353

postmottak@sd.dep.no

https://www.regjeringen.no/en/find-document/id2000006/?documenttype=dokumenter/anbud

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0490

_________________

IN RE THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF:

ALBERT J. LARGHI,

 Deceased.

ANTHONY CHARLES LARGHI and

MARY PATRICIA FLEMING,

 Foreign Ancillary Personal

 Representatives and Appellees,

MARISA ROOT, 

 Petitioner-Heir and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Jennifer B. Lint, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 15 2023

03/15/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0490
§ 304.11 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* This subpart is issued pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1464(v), and section 7 (12 U.S.C. 1817(a)(12)) and section 9 (12 U.S.C. 1819 Tenth) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.
( b ) *Purpose.* This subpart implements 12 U.S.C. 1817(a)(12) to allow reduced reporting for a covered depository institution when such institution makes its reports of condition for the first and third calendar quarters of a year.
( c ) *Scope.* This subpart applies to an insured depository institution, as that term is defined in section 3(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1813(c), that meets the definition of a covered depository institution under § 304.12.
( d ) *Preservation of authority.* Nothing in this subpart in any way limits the authority of the Corporation under other provisions of applicable law and regulation.
#### § 335.321 Maintenance of records and issuer's representations in connection with required reports.

The provisions of the applicable and currently effective SEC regulations under 13(b) of the Exchange Act shall be followed as codified at 17 CFR part 240.

[75 FR 73949, Nov. 30, 2010]
Exhibit 10.7

                              --------------------------------------------------
                                   (Seal)
Name: Black Sands Int. LLC         Instrument #9550999
Address: 7008 E. Gold              Official Records of Yavapai County
Dust, #21, Scottsdale              Margo W. Carson
C/S/Z: AZ 85253                    Request of:
                              Black Sands International
                              Date: 10/03/95     Time: 09:40
                              Fee: 5.00 SC: 4.00 PT 1.00
                              Book 3087 Page 087 Pages: 001

================================================================================

                                 QUIT CLAIM DEED

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

     That I, Robert L. Langguth,  the undersigned,  for the consideration of Ten
Dollars ($10.00), and other valuable considerations,  do hereby release, remise,
and forever quitclaim unto Black Sands International,  LLC, all right, title and
interest in the certain Property  situated in Yavapai County,  State of Arizona,
and described as follows:

         Weaver #1, AMC 318082 a mining claim located in the
         N.W. 1/4, Sec 5 T9N R4W recorded in Yavapai County
         Book 2429, Pg. 508

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have  hereunto set my hand and seal this 1st day of
September, 1995.

ROBERT L. LANGGUTH                                   (Signature)

State of Arizona       )                           ACKNOWLEDGMENT
                       ) ss.
County of Maricopa     )

     On this 1st day of  September  1995,  before  me,  the  undersigned  Notary
Public, personally appeared Robert L. Langguth, known to me to be the individual
who executed the foregoing  instrument and  acknowledged the same to be his free
act and deed.

My Commission Expires: July 8, 1999            (Signature) Claudia Cabrena
                                               Notary Public

                                                          (Seal)
- Mission and History
              - Legacy Honorees
              - Staff
              - Contact
              - FAQ
              - Press
              - Talk Story Newsletter
              - News and Events

                  - Music of Central Asia
                  - Artists from *Rainbow*
                  - Mariachi *bolero*
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10013

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALONZO RICHARD, also known as

Tony Sinclair,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:92-CR-254-H

- - - - - - - - - -

August 26, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alonzo Richard, federal prisoner # 23088-077, seeks leave to

proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal. Richard has failed

to raise any nonfrivolous issues for appeal. See United States

v. Boutwell, 896 F.2d 884, 889-90 (5th Cir. 1990)(one-judge

order). Richard’s motion requesting concurrence form was

actually a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion which the district

court was without jurisdiction to consider without our

authorization. Accordingly, Richard’s motion to proceed IFP on 
No. 99-10013

-2-

appeal is DENIED. Because Richard’s appeal is frivolous, it is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Richard’s motion to supplement

the record is DENIED.

IFP MOTION DENIED; MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD DENIED;

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
§ 313.123 Certification and referral of debt. When the FDIC refers a past-due, legally enforceable debt to FMS for tax refund offset, it will certify to FMS that: ( a ) The debt is past due and legally enforceable in the amount submitted to FMS and that the FDIC will ensure that collections are properly credited to the debt;
( b ) Except in the case of a judgment debt or as otherwise allowed by law, the debt is referred for offset within ten years after the FDIC's right of action accrues;
( c ) The FDIC has made reasonable efforts to obtain payment of the debt, in that it has: ( 1 ) Submitted the debt to FMS for collection by administrative offset and complied with the provisions of 31 U.S.C. 3716(a) and related regulations;
( 2 ) Notified, or has made a reasonable attempt to notify, the debtor that the debt is past-due, and unless repaid within 60 days after the date of the notice, will be referred to FMS for tax refund offset;
( 3 ) Given the debtor at least 60 days to present evidence that all or part of the debt is not past-due or legally enforceable, considered any evidence presented by the debtor, and determined that the debt is past-due and legally enforceable; and
( 4 ) Provided the debtor with an opportunity to make a written agreement to repay the debt; and
( d ) The debt is at least $25.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eldorado Artesian Springs,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  December 31, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Cathleen Shoenfeld, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 USC SS. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to SS. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Cathleen Shoenfeld
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: February 14, 2005
```