alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 261b.9 Changes with respect to publicly announced meeting.

The subject matter of a meeting or the determination to open or close a meeting or a portion of a meeting to public observation may be changed following public announcement under § 261b.6 only if a majority of the members of the agency determines by a recorded vote that agency business so requires and that no earlier announcement of the change was possible. Public announcement of such change and the vote of each member upon such change will be made pursuant to § 261b.6(c). Changes in time, including postponements and cancellations of a publicly announced meeting or portion of a meeting or changes in the place of a publicly announced meeting will be publicly announced pursuant to § 261b.6(c) by the Secretary of the Board or, in the Secretary's absence, the Acting Secretary of the Board.
#### § 4.72 Scope and purpose.

This subpart describes those OCC examiners who are subject to the post-employment restrictions set forth in section 10(k) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act) (12 U.S.C. 1820(k)) and implements those restrictions for officers and employees of the OCC.
#### § 407.6 Transcripts, recordings and minutes of closed meetings.

Eximbank will maintain a complete transcript or electronic recording of the proceedings of every meeting or portion thereof closed to the public, *Provided, however,* That if any meeting or portion thereof is closed pursuant to paragraphs (8), (9)(i) or (10) of § 407.2(a), Eximbank may maintain a set of detailed minutes for such meetings in lieu of a transcript or electronic recording. The entire transcript, electronic recording or set of minutes of a meeting will be made promptly available to the public for inspection and copying in the Office of the Secretary. Copies of such transcript or minutes, as well as copies of the transcription of such recording disclosing the identity of each speaker, will be furnished to any person at the actual cost of duplication or transcription. However, Eximbank will not make available for inspection or copying the transcript, electronic recording or minutes of the discussions of any item on the agenda of such meeting which contains information of the kind described in § 407.2(a). Requests to inspect or to have copies made of any transcript, electronic recording or set of minutes of any meeting or item(s) on the agenda, thereof should be made in writing to the General Counsel and if possible, identify the time, date and place of such meeting and briefly describe the item(s) being sought. Eximbank will maintain a complete verbatim copy of the transcript, a complete electronic recording or a complete copy of the minutes of each meeting, or portion thereof, closed to the public for two years after such meeting or one year from the date of final action of the Board of Directors on all items on the agenda of such meeting, whichever occurs later.

[42 FR 12417, Mar. 4, 1977, as amended at 72 FR 66043, Nov. 27, 2007]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.9

                                    CONTRACT

                  Made and Executed this 21st Day of May, 1998

BETWEEN:       CAMTEK LTD.,
               Old Industrial Zone - Migdal Haemek
               (hereinafter: "Camtek")

                                                                 OF THE ONE PART

AND:           P.C.B. Ltd.,
               Old Industrial Zone - Migdal Haemek
               (hereinafter: "P.C.B.")

                                                               OF THE OTHER PART

WHEREAS,       The parties of this Agreement (hereinafter: the "Parties") are
               parties to a contract of January 1988 (hereinafter: the
               "Contract") concerning the funding of further development of the
               system for identifying defects in printed circuits; and

WHEREAS,       According to the Contract, Camtek undertook to pay P.C.B.
               royalties out of the sale of Camtec's systems according to a
               calculation varying according to sales; and

WHEREAS,       No date for the termination of the payment of royalties was set
               in the Contact; and

WHEREAS,       The Parties have agreed to fix the period for the payment of
               royalties according to the Contract at 10 years from the date of
               the commencement of the sale of the above system;

         Therefore, it is declared, agreed and stipulated between the parties as
follows:

Camtek will pay royalties to P.C.B. according to the Contract until December 30,
1999 and thereafter, Camtek will no longer be committed to pay any royalties to
P.C.B. in respect of the sale of the systems and P.C.B. will not be entitled to
any further payment of royalties from the sale of Camtek's systems.

              (signed)                               (signed)
 ---------------------------------          -------------------------------
             Camtek Ltd.                            P.C.B. Ltd.
# C_2013029EN.01000502.xml

| 31.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/5

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur dated 14 September 2012 in the case of Yngvi Harðarson v Askar Capital hf.

(Case E-10/12)

2013/C 29/06

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter of 14 September 2012 from Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur (Reykjavik District Court), which was received at the Court Registry on 14 September 2012, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Yngvi Harðarson v Askar Capital hf., on the following question:

Should Council Directive 91/533/EEC of 14 October 1991, on an employer’s obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship, be interpreted as meaning, in circumstances including bankruptcy proceedings or a comparable division of a limited liability company, that compensation to an employee is to be assessed on the basis of a written contract of employment if no written document has been handed over to the employee concerning amendments, temporary or permanent, that may have been made to the main features of the contract of employment or employment relationship between the parties within the time-limits laid down in Article 5 of the Directive?

---
# C_2023246EN.01000801.xml

| 13.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/8

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2023/C 246/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 29 March 2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 90093 |
| Decision No | 051/23/COL |
| EFTA State | Liechtenstein |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Prolongation of the State Aid scheme under the Media Support Act |
| Legal basis | Media Support Act of 21 September 2006 (Medienförderungsgesetz), and Ordinance on Media Support of 22 March 2016 (Medienförderungsverordnung) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | To preserve the pluralism of opinions, to promote journalistic-editorial quality, as well as to facilitate the dissemination of opinion-shaping media in Liechtenstein |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | CHF 11,04 million |
| Intensity | 25 % - 40 % |
| Duration | 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2029 |
| Economic sectors | Information and communication |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Medienkommission |
| Äulestrasse 51 |
| Postfach 684 |
| 9490 Vaduz |
| LIECHTENSTEIN |

Date of adoption of the decision

29 March 2023

Case No

90093

Decision No

051/23/COL

EFTA State

Liechtenstein

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Prolongation of the State Aid scheme under the Media Support Act

Legal basis

Media Support Act of 21 September 2006 (Medienförderungsgesetz), and Ordinance on Media Support of 22 March 2016 (Medienförderungsverordnung)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

To preserve the pluralism of opinions, to promote journalistic-editorial quality, as well as to facilitate the dissemination of opinion-shaping media in Liechtenstein

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

CHF 11,04 million

Intensity

25 % - 40 %

Duration

1 January 2024 to 31 December 2029

Economic sectors

Information and communication

Name and address of the granting authority

Medienkommission

Äulestrasse 51

Postfach 684

9490 Vaduz

LIECHTENSTEIN

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/.

---
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22335 Filed:09/20/22 Entered:09/21/22 09:29:11 Desc: Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:22335 Filed:09/20/22 Entered:09/21/22 09:29:11 Desc: Main

Document Page 2 of 2
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3268

To amend title 5, United States Code, to ensure that the health benefits 

program for Federal employees covers screening for glaucoma. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2003

Mr. CUMMINGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to ensure that the 

health benefits program for Federal employees covers 

screening for glaucoma.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee 

5 Health Benefits Glaucoma Screening Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SCREENING FOR GLAUCOMA. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8902 of title 5, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 
2

HR 3268 IH 

1 ‘‘(p)(1) A contract may not be made or a plan ap2 proved which does not provide coverage for screening for 

3 glaucoma for individuals determined to be at high risk for 

4 glaucoma, individuals with a family history of glaucoma 

5 and individuals with diabetes. 

6 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term 

7 ‘screening for glaucoma’ shall have the same meaning as 

8 under title XVIII of the Social Security Act, including the 

9 provisions relating to the frequency of any such screenings 

10 for which coverage may be provided.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) shall apply to services furnished on or after 

13 January 1, 2003.

Æ
§ 371.1 Scope, purpose, and compliance dates. ( a ) *Scope.* This part applies to each insured depository institution that qualifies as a “records entity” under the definition set forth in § 371.2(r).
( b ) *Purpose.* This part establishes recordkeeping requirements with respect to qualified financial contracts for insured depository institutions that are in a troubled condition.
( c ) *Compliance dates.* ( 1 ) Within 3 business days of becoming a records entity, the records entity shall provide to the FDIC, in writing, the name and contact information for the person at the records entity who is responsible for recordkeeping under this part and, unless not required to maintain files in electronic form pursuant to § 371.4(d), a directory of the electronic files that will be used to maintain the information required to be kept by this part.
( 2 ) Except as provided in § 371.6: ( i ) A records entity, other than an accelerated records entity, shall comply with all applicable recordkeeping requirements of this part within 270 days after it becomes a records entity.
( ii ) An accelerated records entity shall comply with all applicable recordkeeping requirements of this part within 60 days after it becomes a records entity.
( iii ) Notwithstanding paragraphs (c)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section, a records entity that becomes an accelerated records entity after it became a records entity shall comply with all applicable recordkeeping requirements of this part within 60 days after it becomes an accelerated records entity or its original 270 day compliance period, whichever time period is shorter.
( d ) *Extensions of time to comply.* The FDIC may, in its discretion, grant one or more extensions of time for compliance with the recordkeeping requirements of this part. ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, no single extension for a records entity shall be for a period of more than 120 days.
( 2 ) For a records entity that is an accelerated records entity at the time of a request for an extension, no single extension shall be for a period of more than 30 days.
( 3 ) A records entity may request an extension of time by submitting a written request to the FDIC at least 15 days prior to the deadline for its compliance with the recordkeeping requirements of this part. The written request for an extension must contain a statement of the reasons why the records entity cannot comply by the deadline for compliance, a project plan (including timeline) for achieving compliance, and a progress report describing the steps taken to achieve compliance.
# Iris Oifigiúil C 402/2021

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | C 402 |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 645 Deireadh Fómhair 2021 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

C 402

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

645 Deireadh Fómhair 2021

---

| Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- |
| | Ceartúcháin |
| | Ceartúchán ar Ráiteas ón gCoimisiún Eorpach maidir le cúnamh a mhodhnú/a chur ar fionraí in Airteagal 8, mír 5 de Rialachán Uimh. (AE) 2021/1529 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle lena mbunaítear an Ionstraim um Chúnamh Réamhaontachais (IPA III) ( IO C 380 I, 20.9.2021 )
  ( IO C 0, 20.9.2021 ) | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

Ceartúcháin

Ceartúchán ar Ráiteas ón gCoimisiún Eorpach maidir le cúnamh a mhodhnú/a chur ar fionraí in Airteagal 8, mír 5 de Rialachán Uimh. (AE) 2021/1529 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle lena mbunaítear an Ionstraim um Chúnamh Réamhaontachais (IPA III) ( IO C 380 I, 20.9.2021 )
  ( IO C 0, 20.9.2021 )

( IO C 380 I, 20.9.2021 )

( IO C 0, 20.9.2021 )

1

---

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

Ceartúcháin

| 5.10.2021 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | C 402/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2021

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

C 402/1

---

Ceartúchán ar Ráiteas ón gCoimisiún Eorpach maidir le cúnamh a mhodhnú/a chur ar fionraí in Airteagal 8, mír 5 de Rialachán Uimh. (AE) 2021/1529 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle lena mbunaítear an Ionstraim um Chúnamh Réamhaontachais (IPA III)

(
  Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 380 I an 20 Meán Fómhair 2021
  )

(Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C Eagrán Speisialta Gaeilge an 20 Meán Fómhair 2021)

(2021/C 402/01)

Measfar Foilseachán (2021/C 380 I/05) ar leathanach 5 a bheith ar neamhní.

---
#### Dora Biegelson, Respondent, *v.*Carrie Kahn et al., Appellants.

(City Court of New York, General Term,

January, 1901.)

Jury — Hay discredit a witness for interest.

A charge to the jury that “Before they can reject the testimony of any witness in the case, the jury must be satisfied that that person willfully, knowingly -and corruptly swore falsely” is erroneous, as they have a right to disregard the testimony of an interested witness if, for any substantial reason, they are dissatisfied with it.

Appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

*611Robert L. Turk (Edward H. Murphy, of counsel), for appellants.

A, *&*C. Steckler (Alfred Steckler, of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

At the plaintiff’s request the court charged the jury, “ Before they can reject the testimony of any witness in the case, the jury must be satisfied that that person willfully, knowingly and corruptly swore falsely,” to which charge the defendants duly excepted. This charge did not state the rule correctly. The jury had a right to disregard the testimony of the interested witnesses if, for any substantial reason, they were dissatisfied with it, and it was not necessary, before rejecting the testimony of an interested witness, that the jury should be satisfied that the witness willfully, knowingly and corruptly swore falsely.

Judgment and order appealed from reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide event.

Present: Eitzsimons, Oh. J., Hascall and O’Dwyer, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
OCTOBER 2, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                                199,925
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         491,741
<ALLOWANCES>                                           34,036
<INVENTORY>                                           348,434
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    1,353,081
<PP&E>                                                435,144
<DEPRECIATION>                                        150,065
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      2,864,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               1,026,884
<BONDS>                                               536,967
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                               12,356
<OTHER-SE>                                            956,880
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        2,864,836
<SALES>                                             1,522,423
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    1,522,423
<CGS>                                                 824,538
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         824,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      116,831
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        5,471
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     39,364
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       118,192
<INCOME-TAX>                                           52,012
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    11,076
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           55,104
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.43


</TABLE>
#### James J. Nealis, as Receiver, etc., Landlord, Appellant, *v.*Bernard Insley et al., Tenants, Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, second district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the defendants.

F. J. Kuerzi, for appellant.

J. J. Vanse, for respondents.-

*743
      *Per Curiam.*

All that the receiver took by his appointment was the right, title, and interest, that the persons for whom he was appointed receiver had in the property at the time the appointment was made.

The justice before whom the case was tried has found that the lease of the defendants to the respondents, Insler and Lepovetech, was made before the appellant was appointed receiver, and there is no evidence to sustain that finding. It is immaterial whether they had or had not actually taken possession of the premises.

It is claimed by the appellant that this matter has in effect been decided by a justice of this court, in a proceeding that was taken to punish the respondents for contempt of court in interfering with the possession of the appellant who is an officer of this court.

We cannot find any such decision. It is true that on one of the exhibits appears a memorandum in the handwriting of the late Mr. Justice Smyth, but that is not sufficient judgment or order of this court, and does not have the effect of either a judgment or order.

The final order is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT A 

PARTY APPEARANCE SHEET

Name of Party Official Committee of 

Unsecured Creditors 

Party Name Abbreviation 

(For Use with Zoom) 

Creditors’ Committee 

Omnibus Hearing Participant 

Attorney(s) Representing Party (provide the listed information 

for each attorney who may appear for the Party): 

 Name, 

 Email, 

 Law Firm, 

 Phone Number and 

 Docket Entry No. for the Attorney’s Notice of 

Appearance

or 

Individual Party-in-interest Not Represented by Counsel: 

 Name, Email, Phone Number, Proof of Claim Number 

(if any) 

Luc A. Despins 

lucdespins@paulhastings.com 

Paul Hastings LLP 

(212) 318-6001 

Docket No. 494 

-andG. Alexander Bongartz 

alexbongartz@paulhastings.com 

Paul Hastings LLP 

(212) 318-6472 

Docket No. 494 

If a Party files a supplemental Party Appearance Sheet, the 

Party must include the Docket Entry No. of the original 

appearance sheet in the new filing which must be clearly 

marked as a “Supplemental” Party Appearance Sheet. 

Note: Pursuant to the Hearing Procedures Order ⁋ 2, the 

Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico 

and the Puerto Rico Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory 

Authority shall each be limited to 4 attorneys appearing in the

Zoom session at any given time, and each other party-ininterest shall be limited to 2 attorneys at any given time. 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19806-1 Filed:01/18/22 Entered:01/18/22 12:57:51 Desc:

Exhibit A Page 1 of 1