alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 2 - 0 594 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 0 19 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

72) ll-K- (B) -60 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:50 AM Sheet 72 of 325 
P.2 

(0) 

II-K-(B)-60 

ACCURACY OF IFCAM SIP FILE FOR INDIANA, ILLINOIS, AND 

OHIO. 

Letter from M. Neu, EEA to R. Short, EPA:SASD. 

February 4, 1981, 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-60
#### § 303.100 Scope.

This subpart sets forth the circumstances under which an FDIC-supervised institution must notify the FDIC of a change in any member of its board of directors or any senior executive officer and the procedures for filing such notice. This subpart implements section 32 of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1831i).

[85 FR 3244, Jan. 21, 2020]
#### Martin William Craven, Respondent, *v.*The Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial had before the court without a jury.

Strong *&*Caldwalader (W. W. Thompson, of counsel), for appellant.

House, Grossman *&*Vorhaus (Louis J. Vorhaus and Joseph Fischer, of counsel), for respondent.

*790*Per*Curiam.*

The action is to recover damages for the loss of the plaintiff’s baggage in a wreck caused by the derailment of part of a train belonging to and operated by the defendant. It is urged by the appellant’s counsel that the proof fails to show either the destruction of the respondent’s property, or that it was lost through the negligence of the appellant. But, as no motion was made by the appellant at the close of the whole case, or at any other stage of the trial, to dismiss the complaint, except on the ground that the court below had no jurisdiction of the action because it was a foreign corporation the appellant, by failing to base his motion upon other grounds, conceded that there were issues of fact to be determined. Rusher v. Brennan, 29 Misc. Rep. 143.

If we may be permitted, however, to pass upon the facts, we think there was sufficient evidence adduced - upon the trial to warrant the justice in finding, as is assumed from the judgment, that the baggage in suit was lost as the result of an accident and that such accident was solely due to the negligence of the appellant. The Court of Appeals, having decided in Worthington v. London G. *&*A. Co., 164 N. Y. 81, that the Municipal Court of the city of New York has jurisdiction over foreign corporations, the argument of the appellant’s counsel has been confined to the merits of the case.

After carefully considering the record we are of the opinion that the judgment is right, and hence, that it should be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

*

 Opinion rendered by the associate justices after the death of Presiding Justice Beekman.— [Rep.
# Uradni list C 363I/9. s

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 363I |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 649. september 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 363I

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 649. september 2021

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | Popravki |
| 2021/C 363 I/01 | Popravek Razpisa za zbiranje prijav za izbor nadzornice/nadzornika za procesna jamstva v okviru preiskav, ki jih izvaja Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) – COM/2021/20062 ( UL C 279 A, 13.7.2021 ) | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

Popravki

2021/C 363 I/01

Popravek Razpisa za zbiranje prijav za izbor nadzornice/nadzornika za procesna jamstva v okviru preiskav, ki jih izvaja Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) – COM/2021/20062 ( UL C 279 A, 13.7.2021 )

( UL C 279 A, 13.7.2021 )

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

Popravki

| 9.9.2021 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CI 363/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2021

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CI 363/1

---

Popravek Razpisa za zbiranje prijav za izbor nadzornice/nadzornika za procesna jamstva v okviru preiskav, ki jih izvaja Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) – COM/2021/20062

(
  Uradni list Evropske unije C 279 A z dne 13. julija 2021
  )

(2021/C 363 I/01)

Stran 3, točka 4, pod naslovom „Rok za prijavo“, prvi odstavek:

| besedilo: | „Rok za prijavo je 9. september 2021. Po 12. uri (opoldne) po bruseljskem času spletna prijava ne bo več mogoča.“ |
| --- | --- |

besedilo:

„Rok za prijavo je 9. september 2021. Po 12. uri (opoldne) po bruseljskem času spletna prijava ne bo več mogoča.“

| se glasi: | „Rok za prijavo je 23. september 2021. Po 12. uri (opoldne) po bruseljskem času spletna prijava ne bo več mogoča.“ |
| --- | --- |

se glasi:

se glasi:

„Rok za prijavo je 23. september 2021. Po 12. uri (opoldne) po bruseljskem času spletna prijava ne bo več mogoča.“

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.39

                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                             1998 STOCK OPTION PLAN

                               W I T N E S S E T H

         WHEREAS, the board of directors of LPA Holding Corp. (the
"Corporation") has deemed it in the best interests of the Corporation and its
shareholders to amend the provisions of the LPA Holding Corp. 1998 Stock Option
Plan (the "Plan") to increase the number of Options (as defined in the Plan)
available for grant thereunder from 60,074 to 725,000.

         NOW THEREFORE,

         Section 1.   Amendment.

                  (a) Section 4(f) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the
second sentence of such Section and replacing it in its entirety as follows:

                  "Subject to any equitable adjustments for Recapitalizations
pursuant to Section 14, the number of Shares subject at any one time to Options
granted under this Plan, and the number of Shares theretofore issued and
delivered pursuant to the exercise of Options granted under this Plan, shall be
725,000 Shares"

         Section 2.   Miscellaneous.

                  (a) Except as modified by this amendment, the Plan shall
remain in full force and effect, enforceable in accordance with its terms. This
amendment is not a consent to any waiver or modification of any other terms or
conditions of any agreements, instruments or documents referred to in the Plan
and shall not prejudice any right or rights which the parties thereunder may now
or hereafter have under or in connection with the Plan or any of the instruments
or documents referred to therein.

                  (b) This amendment shall be governed and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York.
# C_2006140EN.01000501.xml

| 15.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/5

---

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

EFTA Surveillance Authority decision not to raise objections

(2006/C 140/05)

Date of adoption:

EFTA State: Norway

Aid No: 59033

Title: National direct transport aid scheme

Objective: The objective of the scheme is to offset competitive disadvantages resulting from extra transport costs for firms located in peripheral areas and within sparsely populated regions and thus situated long distances away from their markets

Legal basis: Regulation No 565 of 09.05.2003 on investment grants and delimitation of the geographical area for development funds (Forskrift om investeringstilskot og avgrensing av det geografiske verkeområdet for dei regional- og distriktspolitiske verkemidla), Regulation No 1461 of 24.06.2004 on national transport aid (Forskrift om nasjonal transportstøtte), Proposition to the Storting No 1 (2004-2005) from the Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development (the State budget), and National guidelines for transport aid (Nasjonale retningslinjer for transportstøtte)

Forskrift om investeringstilskot og avgrensing av det geografiske verkeområdet for dei regional- og distriktspolitiske verkemidla

Forskrift om nasjonal transportstøtte

Nasjonale retningslinjer for transportstøtte

Budget/Duration: The budget of the scheme is NOK 375 million (approximately EUR 47 million) per year. The duration of the scheme is until 31 December 2006. The authorized amendments will be valuable for 2005 and 2006

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregister

---
§ 390.418 Escrow requirement. ( a ) Any funds received in an offering which is offered and sold on a best efforts all-or-none condition or with a minimum-maximum amount to be sold shall be held in an escrow or similar separate account until such time as all of the securities are sold with respect to a best efforts all-or-none offering or the stated minimum amount of securities are sold in a minimum-maximum offering.
( b ) If the amount of securities required to be sold under escrow conditions in paragraph (a) of this section are not sold within the time period for the offering as disclosed in the offering circular, all funds in the escrow account shall be promptly refunded unless the FDIC otherwise approves an extension of the offering period upon a showing of good cause and provided that the extension is consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.165

                                   DEMAND NOTE

$351,000.00                                                   New York, New York
                                                              May 10, 2000

        FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Wilshire Technologies, Inc. a
California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Borrower"), hereby
unconditionally PROMISES TO PAY to the order to TRILON DOMINION PARTNERS, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company ("Lender"), at 245 Park Avenue, 28th Floor,
New York, NY 10167, or at such other place as the holder of this Demand Note may
designate from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United States of
America and in immediately available funds, the principal amount of Three
Hundred Fifty One Thousand and 00/100, DOLLARS ($351,000.00), together with
interest on the unpaid principal amount of this Demand Note outstanding from
time to time from the date hereof, at a rate per annum equal to the Prime rate
of interest plus 3.0%, or the highest rate permitted by law, whichever shall be
less.

        The principal amount of the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be
payable on demand. Interest thereon shall be paid when principal is paid from
the date hereof until such principal amount is paid in full at such interest
rate as specified above. Following failure to pay on demand, Borrower agrees to
pay interest on any overdue payment of principal at a rate per annum equal to
the stated interest rate plus 5%, or the highest rate permitted by law,
whichever shall be less. All interest calculations shall be computed on the
basis of a 360 day year.

        Demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment and protest are
hereby waived by Borrower.

        Borrower shall have no right to make any off-set against or deduct from
any payment due under this Demand Note.

        Principal and interest may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

        This Demand Note may not be changed orally, but only by an agreement in
writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change is
sought.

        All covenants of Borrower in this Demand Note and all rights of the
holder under this Demand Note shall bind Borrower and its successors and
assigns, and all such covenants and rights shall inure to the benefit of the
holder of this Demand Note and its successors and assigns.

        This Demand Note has been delivered and accepted at New York, New York
and shall be interpreted, governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
laws of the State of New York.

                                                  Wilshire Technologies, Inc.



                                                  By: /s/ KATHLEEN E. TERRY
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                  Name:  Kathleen E. Terry
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
# C_2012029EN.01001201.xml

| 2.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/12

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Fürstliches Landgericht, dated 14 September 2011, in the case between Granville Establishment and Volker Anhalt, Melanie Anhalt and Jasmin Barbaro, née Anhalt

(Case E-13/11)

2012/C 29/09

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter of 15 September 2011 from Fürstliches Landgericht, Liechtenstein (Princely Court of Justice, Liechtenstein), which was received at the Court Registry on 22 September 2011, for an Advisory Opinion in the case between Granville Establishment and Volker Anhalt, Melanie Anhalt and Jasmin Barbaro, née Anhalt, on the following questions:

| 1. | Can a national of an EEA State rely on a provision such as Section 53a of the Liechtenstein Jurisdiction Law, which accords Liechtenstein nationals the right not to be sued abroad on the basis of a jurisdiction agreement unless that jurisdiction agreement has been publicly recorded, and derive directly there from also the right not to be sued in Liechtenstein (and, thus, from the perspective of that national, also abroad) on the basis of a jurisdiction agreement unless it has been publicly recorded? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can a national of an EEA State rely on a provision such as Section 53a of the Liechtenstein Jurisdiction Law, which accords Liechtenstein nationals the right not to be sued abroad on the basis of a jurisdiction agreement unless that jurisdiction agreement has been publicly recorded, and derive directly there from also the right not to be sued in Liechtenstein (and, thus, from the perspective of that national, also abroad) on the basis of a jurisdiction agreement unless it has been publicly recorded?

| 2. | If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative. Can that right be invoked in a case such as the one at hand, that is, in civil law proceedings, and thus directly in a dispute between private parties? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative. Can that right be invoked in a case such as the one at hand, that is, in civil law proceedings, and thus directly in a dispute between private parties?

---
#### § 347.214 Branch established under section 5 of the International Banking Act.

A foreign bank may operate any state branch as a noninsured branch whenever the foreign bank has entered into an agreement with the FRB to accept at that branch only those deposits as would be permissible for a corporation organized under section 25(a) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 611 *et seq.*) and implementing rules and regulations administered by the FRB (12 CFR 211).
Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to the requirements of Rules 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, James T. Posillico provides the following certification.

     I, James T. Posillico, President and Chief Executive Officer of Vitro
Diagnostics, Inc. ("Company") certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
          untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the period covered by this quarterly report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
          information included in the quarterly report, fairly present in all
          material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
          cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
          this quarterly report;

     4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
          and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15-d-14)
          for the registrant and have designed such disclosure controls and
          procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company
          is made know to me by others, particularly during the period in which
          this quarterly report is being prepared;

     5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Company's
          auditors and the audit committee of our board of directors (or persons
          performing the equivalent functions):

          a.   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
               internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's
               ability to record, process, summarize and report financial date
               and have identified for the Company's auditors any material
               weaknesses in internal controls, and

          b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
               other employees which have a significant role in the Company's
               internal controls; and

     6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
          significant changes in internal control or in other factors that could
          significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my
          most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard
          to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: June 14, 2005                      /s/  James T. Posillico
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              James T. Posillico, President and
                                              Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 28, 2013

d1021 

# Order

Clerk October 28, 2013

147291

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147291

COA: 309303

Berrien CC: 2011

- 002807

- FH

MELODY TYNETTE JONES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 25, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the

case of People v Earl (Docket No. 145677) is pending on appeal before this Court and

that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the

decision in that case.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-90,503-01

EX P ARTE IRVIN JOSEPH WILLIAMS, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1313198-A IN THE 182 DISTRICT COURT N D F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 9 6 7 ). Applicant was convicted of the offense of murder a nd sentenc ed to imprisonment for 52 y ear s. On Fe bruar

y 2, 2016, an order desig nating issues was signe d by the trial court. The habea s
re cord has been proper ly forwa rded to this Court by the district cler k pursuant to T E X . R
. A P P . P
. 73.4(b)( 5). Howeve r, t h e re co rd h as been forwa rded without the trial court having resolved the desig nated issue(s) in this case . We rema nd this applica t i o n to the 182 District Court of Har ris n d County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiar y investiga tion and enter finding s of fac t andconclusions of law
.

This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s o f t h i s o rd er. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order. A ny extensions of ti me must be re quested by

the trial cour

t and shall be obtaine d from this Court. Filed: Dec ember

18, 2019 Do not publish