alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### EX PARTE MORGAN.

(Decided April 17, 1913.

Rehearing denied May 18, 1913.)

Original petition in Court of Appeals.

Denson & Denson, and Evins & Jack, for appellant. McKinley, McQueen, Hawkins & Snow, and A. G. & E. D. Smith, for appellee.

Thomas, J. —

Petition dismissed on authority of *Ex parte Dew, 7*Ala. App. 437, 62 South. 261.
#### § 308.17 Collateral attacks on adjudicatory proceeding.

If an interlocutory appeal or collateral attack is brought in any court concerning all or any part of an adjudicatory proceeding, the challenged adjudicatory proceeding will continue without regard to the pendency of that court proceeding. No default or other failure to act as directed in the adjudicatory proceeding within the times prescribed in this subpart will be excused based on the pendency before any court of any interlocutory appeal or collateral attack.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3061 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3061

  To authorize major medical facility projects for the Department of 
 Veterans Affairs in connection with the Capital Asset Realignment for 
  Enhanced Services initiative and to satisfy Department of Veterans 
   Affairs requirements on natural disasters, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 10, 2003

 Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida (for herself, Mr. Acevedo-Vila, and Ms. 
   Berkley) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize major medical facility projects for the Department of 
 Veterans Affairs in connection with the Capital Asset Realignment for 
  Enhanced Services initiative and to satisfy Department of Veterans 
   Affairs requirements on natural disasters, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF MAJOR MEDICAL FACILITY PROJECTS.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may carry out the following major 
medical facility projects, with each project to be carried out in an 
amount not to exceed the amount specified for that project:
            (1) Construction of a health care facility at a location in 
        East Central Florida selected by the Secretary, as part of the 
        Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES) 
        initiative, $170,000,000.
            (2) Improvements of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
        Medical Center in San Juan, Puerto Rico, in order to bring that 
        facility into compliance with the CD-54 Natural Disasters 
        Directive, $30,000,000.
            (3) Construction of a health care facility in Las Vegas, 
        Nevada, as part of the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced 
        Services initiative, $250,000,000.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--There are authorized to be appropriated for the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2004 for the 
Construction, Major Projects, account, a total of $450,000,000 for the 
projects authorized in section 1.
    (b) Limitation.--The projects authorized in section 1 may only be 
carried out using--
            (1) funds appropriated for fiscal year 2004 pursuant to the 
        authorization of appropriations in subsection (a);
            (2) funds appropriated for Construction, Major Projects, 
        for a fiscal year before fiscal year 2004 that remain available 
        for obligation; and
            (3) funds appropriated for Construction, Major Projects, 
        for fiscal year 2004 for a category of activity not specific to 
        a project.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, George Feldenkreis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Perry Ellis International, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Perry Ellis International, Inc.



|               |  |                              
|-------------- |  | -----------------------------
|April 13, 2011
|               | 
|By:            |  | /s/ George Feldenkreis       
|Name:          |  | George Feldenkreis           
|Title:         |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|               |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3234

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

14 Chestnut Street in Liberty, New York, as the ‘‘Ben R. Gerow Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 2, 2003

Mr. HINCHEY (for himself, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. 

BOEHLERT, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. HOUGHTON, 

Mr. ISRAEL, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. KING of New York, Mrs. LOWEY, Mrs. 

MALONEY, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. MCNULTY, 

Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. NADLER, Mr. OWENS, Mr. QUINN, Mr. 

RANGEL, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. SERRANO, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. 

SWEENEY, Mr. TOWNS, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. WALSH, and Mr. WEINER) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 14 Chestnut Street in Liberty, New York, 

as the ‘‘Ben R. Gerow Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BEN R. GEROW POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 14 Chestnut Street in Liberty, 
2

•HR 3234 IH 

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ben 

2 R. Gerow Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the Ben R. Gerow Post 

7 Office Building.

Æ
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     Exhibit 23


                         Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of OM Group, Inc. of our report dated February 12, 1999, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of OM Group, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Registration Number         Description                                                      Filing Date
-------------------         -----------                                                      -----------
<S>                      <C>                                                               <C>
33-74674                    OM Group, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Compensation
                              Plan - Form S-8 Registration Statement -
                              1,015,625 Shares                                               January 27, 1994

333-07529                   OMG Americas, Inc. Employees' Profit Sharing Plan
                              -- Form S-8 Registration Statement - 250,000 Shares            July 3, 1996

333-07531                   OM Group, Inc. Non-Employee Directors' Equity Plan
                             -- Form S-8 Registration Statement - 250,000 Shares             July 3, 1996
</TABLE>



                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 22, 1999
#### RICHARDSON V. THE STATE.

(Decided April 24, 1913.)

Appeal from Anniston City Court.

Heard before 1-Ion. Thomas VY. Coleman. Jr.

No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell,. Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
#### John W. Haaren, Respondent, *v.*Henry Hawkes, Impleaded, Etc., Appellant.

Appeal from judgment upon verdict directed by the court.

Sidney H. Stuart, for appellant.

Appell *&*Reid (Albert J. Appell, of counsel), for respondent.

Hascall, J.

No sufficient ground appears for disturbing the record in this case.

Judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, CL J., Hascall and O’Dwyer, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT K 

Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:2247-11 Filed:01/16/18 Entered:01/16/18 18:13:49 Desc:

Exhibit K Page 1 of 3
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 4.6
                           CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF
                         ALLEGIANT CAPITAL TRUST II
                         --------------------------

          THIS Certificate of Trust of Allegiant Capital Trust II (the "Trust"),
is being duly executed and filed by Bankers Trust (Delaware), a Delaware
banking corporation, as trustee, to form a business trust under the Delaware
Business Trust Act (12 Del. Code, Section 3801 et seq.) (the "Act").
                       ---------               -- ---

          1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Allegiant
             ----
Capital Trust II.

          2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
             ----------------
the Trust in the State of Delaware is Bankers Trust (Delaware), 1011 Centre
Road, Suite 200, Wilmington, Delaware 19805-1266.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustee of the
Trust, has executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section
3811(a) of the Act.



                                          BANKERS TRUST (DELAWARE),
                                            not in its individual capacity but
                                            solely as trustee of the Trust.


                                          By:    /s/ Elizabeth B. Ferry
                                              --------------------------------
                                          Name:  Elizabeth B. Ferry
                                          Title: Trustee
Wärtsilä NOx Reducer (2012), © Wärtsilä 

# Indicative dimensions for Transocean 18th

# of May 2012 

# WÄRTSILÄ NOx 

# Reducer (NOR) with integrated Oxi catalystWärtsilä NOx Reducer (2012), © Wärtsilä 

# Indicative dimensions for W32

L

H W *bends are allowed after straight length ** includes straight length 

## The reactor orientation can be vertical or horizontal. All dimensions are indicative and given only to get a rough grip of the size. Detailed dimensioning can be made when all parameters are known. The dimensions are based on NOx reduction from IMO Tier II to IMO Tier III. Engine type Engine power Reactor Reactor W Reactor H Reactor L Reactor inlet flange DNReactor

outlet flange DNMixing duct

straight length* Mixing

duct total length ** kW Size mm mm mm mm mm m m 6L32D 3000 12 1640 1800 3578 1000 800 2.6 4 9L32D 4500 16 1960 2120 3808 1200 1000 2.8 4.3 12V32D 6000 19 2280 2280 4040 1400 1100 2.8 4.3 18V32D 9000 24 2600 2760 4270 1600 1300 3.2 4.8

# Wärtsilä NOR system overview

Wärtsilä NOx Reducer (2012), © Wärtsilä

# Exhaust gas component arrangement: Example

Engine Mixing

duct
(possibility to install integrated silencer) 

# NOR

reactor Boiler (water trap/drain required between SCR reactor and boiler) 

# Silencer Scrubber

Wärtsilä NOx Reducer (2012), © Wärtsilä 

## 3⁄4Mixing duct and SCR reactor are the first components after the engine due to the temp. requirement

3⁄4NOR designed for high sulphur fuel is compatible with scrubber and can be efficiently operated on sufficient exhaust gas temperature window
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****The ... Scientific and TechnologicalAchievement Awards (STAA) Program [electronic resource].
 
SuDoc Number:EP 1.136:
Item Number:0431-J-44 (online)
CGP System Number:000605579
 
1999 | 2002 | 2003
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 1, 2017********
#### § 326.2 Designation of security officer.

Upon the issuance of Federal deposit insurance, the board of directors of each institution shall designate a security officer who shall have the authority, subject to the approval of the board of directors, to develop, within a reasonable time, but no later than 180 days, and to administer a written security program for each banking office.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3185 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3185

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  38 Spring Street in Nashua, New Hampshire, as the ``Hugh Gregg Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 38 
Spring Street in Nashua, New Hampshire, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Hugh Gregg Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Hugh Gregg Post Office 
Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 329.102 Rules of construction. ( a ) *Balance-sheet metric.* Unless otherwise provided in this subpart, an NSFR regulatory capital element, NSFR liability, or asset that is not included on an FDIC-supervised institution's balance sheet is not assigned an RSF factor or ASF factor, as applicable; and an NSFR regulatory capital element, NSFR liability, or asset that is included on an FDIC-supervised institution's balance sheet is assigned an RSF factor or ASF factor, as applicable.
( b ) *Netting of certain transactions.* Where an FDIC-supervised institution has secured lending transactions, secured funding transactions, or asset exchanges with the same counterparty and has offset the gross value of receivables due from the counterparty under the transactions by the gross value of payables under the transactions due to the counterparty, the receivables or payables associated with the offsetting transactions that are not included on the FDIC-supervised institution's balance sheet are treated as if they were included on the FDIC-supervised institution's balance sheet with carrying values, unless the criteria in 12 CFR 324.10(c)(2)(v)(A) through (C) are met.
( c ) *Treatment of Securities Received in an Asset Exchange by a Securities Lender.* Where an FDIC-supervised institution receives a security in an asset exchange, acts as a securities lender, includes the carrying value of the received security on its balance sheet, and has not rehypothecated the security received: ( 1 ) The security received by the FDIC-supervised institution is not assigned an RSF factor; and
( 2 ) The obligation to return the security received by the FDIC-supervised institution is not assigned an ASF factor.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 4, 2018

d1126

Order 

Clerk

December 4, 2018

157491 & (12)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 157491

COA: 339882

Oakland CC: 2008-223666-FC

BRYAN VALENTIN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED to the 

extent that the attached documents are considered as offers of proof. The application for 

leave to appeal the February 7, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is 

DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement 

to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
# Službeni list C 363I/9. r

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 363I |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 64.9 rujna 2021. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 363I

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 64.9 rujna 2021.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | Ispravci |
| 2021/C 363 I/01 | Ispravak Poziva na podnošenje prijava za odabir nadzornika postupovnih jamstava u kontekstu istraga koje provodi Europski ured za borbu protiv prijevara (OLAF) – COM/2021/20062 ( SL C 279 A, 13.7.2021. ) | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

Ispravci

2021/C 363 I/01

Ispravak Poziva na podnošenje prijava za odabir nadzornika postupovnih jamstava u kontekstu istraga koje provodi Europski ured za borbu protiv prijevara (OLAF) – COM/2021/20062 ( SL C 279 A, 13.7.2021. )

( SL C 279 A, 13.7.2021. )

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

Ispravci

| 9.9.2021 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CI 363/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2021

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CI 363/1

---

Ispravak Poziva na podnošenje prijava za odabir nadzornika postupovnih jamstava u kontekstu istraga koje provodi Europski ured za borbu protiv prijevara (OLAF) – COM/2021/20062

(
  Službeni list Europske unije C 279 A od 13. srpnja 2021.
  )

(2021/C 363 I/01)

Na stranici 3., u točki 4., pod „Rok za prijavu”, prvi odlomak:

| umjesto: | „Rok za prijavu istječe 9. rujna 2021. Nakon 12 sati (podne) prema briselskom vremenu više se neće biti moguće prijaviti.”; |
| --- | --- |

umjesto:

„Rok za prijavu istječe 9. rujna 2021. Nakon 12 sati (podne) prema briselskom vremenu više se neće biti moguće prijaviti.”;

| treba stajati: | „Rok za prijavu istječe 23. rujna 2021. Nakon 12 sati (podne) prema briselskom vremenu više se neće biti moguće prijaviti.”. |
| --- | --- |

treba stajati:

treba stajati:

„Rok za prijavu istječe 23. rujna 2021. Nakon 12 sati (podne) prema briselskom vremenu više se neće biti moguće prijaviti.”.

---
# C_2007053EN.01000401.xml

| 8.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/4

---

54th amendment of the State Aid Guidelines

EFTA Surveillance Authority decision to propose appropriate measures

(2007/C 53/04)

Date of adoption:

EFTA State: n.a.

Case No: 47171

Title: Amending for the fifty-fourth time the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid including proposal for appropriate measures.

Legal basis: College Decision No 329/05/COL

Decision: The appropriate measures, proposed by the Authority and accepted by the EFTA States are as follows:

to amend their existing aid schemes relating to State aid covered by the new Chapter 30A of the Authority's State Aid Guidelines so to comply with the Guidelines by 1 June 2007 at the latest.

---
# C_2012384EN.01000801.xml

| 13.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/8

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

2012/C 384/07

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measures constitute compatible State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 11 July 2012 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 68972 |
| Decision number | : | 292/12/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Decision regarding State aid granted by the Icelandic State through New Glitnir, New Landsbankinn and New Kaupþing during the wind up of certain investment funds |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(1) and Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA |
| Type of measures | : | Measures to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Economic sectors | : | Financial services |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

11 July 2012

Case number

:

68972

Decision number

:

292/12/COL

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Decision regarding State aid granted by the Icelandic State through New Glitnir, New Landsbankinn and New Kaupþing during the wind up of certain investment funds

Legal basis

:

Article 61(1) and Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA

Type of measures

:

Measures to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy

Economic sectors

:

Financial services

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---