alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CORNER LOT ASSESSMENTS. -

[Montgomery Circuit Court,

June Term, 1894.]

Stewart, Shauck and Shearer, JJ.

#### E. J. Barney v. Dayton (City).

A Corner Dot May Have Two Fronts.

If the improvements on a corner lot contain gates opening on each street, the lot fronts and may he assessed for improvements on both streets.

On Appear from the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery county.

*Gottschcd &*Brown, *McMahon & McMahon, Patterson &*Murphy,, *Emmanuel &*Dwyer, *John M. Sprigg,*for plaintiff.

*William Craighead*and *Frank*Conover, city solicitors.

Shearer, J.

In this and eight other cases, submitted on appeal, in which injunctions are sought restraining the city of Dayton from enforcing certain street assessments made under the special act governing street improvements in said city, etc., which act, so far as the questions herein are concerned, does not materially differ from the general law, we hold:

1. That when a lot is bounded breadthwise by a street and lengthwise by another street, and the improvements thereon contain gates opening upon each street intended to be, and which are or may be, used for ingress and egress to and from such buildings, -such lot “fronts” upon both streets

2. In such case, where each of such streets is improved, assessments may be made upon such lot for the number of feet such lot abuts upon, or is bounded by, such improvements, respectively. .

3. Where, as in Stout’s case, the lot abuts lengthwise upon an improvement, but is separated from such improvement by a continuous fence, without gates or other openings, or means of passing through or over the same, such lot does not “front” upon the improvement: and an assessment thereon for any portion of the cost of said improvement, in excess of the number of feet breadthwise,, is illegal.

4. Haviland’s case, 50 O. S., 481, does not hold that a lot may not have cwofronts, and we are unwilling to extend it beyond its strict and necessary purview.

5. “Abounding” in the Dayton act means “bounding” or “bounded by.”' “Bound” is synonymous with “limit” or “border.” The definitions of “abounding,” as claimed by counsel,' demonstrate that that word was not intended by the legislature. The a must be rejected. “Abut” means the same as “bound” — that is “to terminate or border; to be contiguous; to meet.”

In view of the foregoing, all the cases will be dismissed at the costs of the respective plaintiffs, excepting Stout’s case, wherein the enforcement of the assessment will be enjoined as to all in excess of the number of feet embraced in the Second street or breadthwise front. And in the Babbitt and Weakley cases the collection of the assessments in excess of twenty-five per centum upon the valuation for taxation will be enjoined.
# C_2017321EN.01001102.xml

| 28.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/11

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 7 June 2017

in Case E-18/16

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Regulation (EU) No 98/2013 on the marketing and use of explosives precursors)

(Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Regulation (EU) No 98/2013 on the marketing and use of explosives precursors)

(2017/C 321/10)

In Case E-18/16, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland — APPLICATION for a declaration that Iceland has failed to adopt the measures necessary to make the Act referred to at point 12zzq of Chapter XV of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Regulation (EU) No 98/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 on the marketing and use of explosives precursors), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, part of its internal legal order as required by Article 7 of the Agreement, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Benedikt Bogason (ad hoc), Judges, gave judgment on 7 June 2017, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that Iceland has failed to adopt the measures necessary to make the Act referred to at point 12zzq of Chapter XV of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Regulation (EU) No 98/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 on the marketing and use of explosives precursors), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, part of its internal legal order as required by Article 7 of the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that Iceland has failed to adopt the measures necessary to make the Act referred to at point 12zzq of Chapter XV of Annex II to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Regulation (EU) No 98/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 on the marketing and use of explosives precursors), as adapted to the Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto, part of its internal legal order as required by Article 7 of the Agreement.

| 2. | Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
§ 28.5 Filing of notice. ( a ) *Where to file.* A national bank shall file any notice or submission required under this subpart with the appropriate supervisory office of the OCC.
( b ) *Availability of forms.* Individual forms and instructions for filings are available from the appropriate supervisory office of the OCC.
[61 FR 19532, May 2, 1996, as amended at 68 FR 70699, Dec. 19, 2003]
Exhibit 99.1




				Exhibit 99(i)

		 	   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
			       18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Nutek, Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter  ended  June  30,  2003  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  Murray N. Conradie, Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted  pursuant to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies  with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results of  operations  of  the
Company.

                                     /s/ Murray N. Conradie
                                     ------------------------------------------

                                    MURRAY N. CONRADIE, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 12, 2003
# C_2008125EN.01001901.xml

| 22.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 125/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 125/19

---

Values of thresholds in the field of public procurement

(2008/C 125/10)

The values of thresholds applicable pursuant to the Act referred to at point 2 (1) of Annex XVI to the EEA Agreement (Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1422/2007) and the Act referred to at point 4 (2) of Annex XVI to the EEA Agreement (Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1422/2007) are the following:

1

2

| EUR | ISK | CHF
  (Liechtenstein) | NOK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 80 000 | 6 828 496 | 127 173 | 642 446 |
| 133 000 | 11 352 374 | 211 426 | 1 068 066 |
| 206 000 | 17 583 377 | 327 471 | 1 654 298 |
| 412 000 | 35 166 754 | 654 943 | 3 308 595 |
| 750 000 | 64 017 150 | 1 192 250 | 6 022 928 |
| 1 000 000 | 85 356 200 | 1 589 667 | 8 030 571 |
| 5 150 000 | 439 584 430 | 8 186 785 | 41 357 440 |

EUR

ISK

CHF

(Liechtenstein)

NOK

80 000

6 828 496

127 173

642 446

133 000

11 352 374

211 426

1 068 066

206 000

17 583 377

327 471

1 654 298

412 000

35 166 754

654 943

3 308 595

750 000

64 017 150

1 192 250

6 022 928

1 000 000

85 356 200

1 589 667

8 030 571

5 150 000

439 584 430

8 186 785

41 357 440

---

(1)  As last amended by Decisions of the EEA Joint Committee No 68/2006 and No 69/2006, both of 2 June 2006, amending Annex XVI (Procurement) to the EEA Agreement.

1

(2)  Idem.

2

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      I, Gelu Voicu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
April 27, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc.


Date: July 16, 2003                        By: /s/  Gelu Voicu
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Gelu Voicu
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

      I, Thomas E. Gay, III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that Annual
Report of Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
April 27, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Catalyst Semiconductor, Inc.


Date: July 16, 2003                        By: /s/  Thomas E. Gay, III
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Thomas E. Gay, III
                                           Vice President of Finance and
                                           Administration and Chief Financial
                                           Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3019 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3019

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the military death 
gratuity from $6,000 to $12,000 and to provide that such death gratuity 
shall be excluded from gross income under the Internal Revenue Code of 
                                 1986.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 5, 2003

 Mr. McGovern introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 
Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the military death 
gratuity from $6,000 to $12,000 and to provide that such death gratuity 
shall be excluded from gross income under the Internal Revenue Code of 
                                 1986.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN DEATH GRATUITY PAYABLE WITH RESPECT TO DECEASED 
              MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) Amount of Death Gratuity.--Section 1478(a) of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``$6,000'' and inserting 
``$12,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to deaths occurring on or after September 11, 2001.

SEC. 2. DEATH GRATUITY EXCLUDIBLE FROM FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 134(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain military benefits) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new flush sentence:
        ``Such term shall include any death gratuity to which the 
        limitation in section 1478(a) of title 10, United States Code, 
        applies.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to amounts paid with respect to deaths occurring on or after 
September 11, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 269.9 Mediation of negotiation impasses.

In the event of an impasse in negotiations between the parties for a collective bargaining agreement, either the labor organization or the Bank may request the appointment of a qualified neutral person as a mediator to assist the parties in attempting to resolve the impasse. The parties will meet promptly with the mediator, and all matters discussed, as well as any documents submitted, shall not be publicly divulged for any reason. The cost of the mediator shall be borne equally by the parties.
3-LTS Doc#:19826-2 Filed:01/18/22 Entered:01/19/22 16:28:56 Desc:

Envelope Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.10

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                          MISSION RESOURCES CORPORATION

         Mission Resources Corporation, a corporation organized and existing
under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"),
does hereby certify:

         The amendments to the Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation set
forth in the following resolution approved by the Corporation's Board of
Directors and stockholders were duly adopted in accordance with the provisions
of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware:

         "RESOLVED, that the introductory paragraph of Article Four of the
Company's Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended in its entirety so
that, as amended, it shall be and read as follows, with the remainder of Article
Four to remain unamended:

                  The Corporation shall have authority to issue two classes of
         stock, and the total number authorized shall be sixty million
         (60,000,000) shares of Common Stock of the par value of one cent ($.01)
         each, and five million (5,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock of the par
         value of one cent ($.01) each. A description of the different classes
         of stock of the Corporation and a statement of the designations and the
         powers, preferences and rights, and the qualifications, limitations or
         restrictions thereof, in respect of each class of such stock are as
         follows:"

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mission Resources Corporation has caused this
Certificate to be signed and attested by its duly authorized officers, this 8th
day of May, 2001.

                                           MISSION RESOURCES CORPORATION



                                           By: /s/ Douglas Manner
                                              ----------------------------------
                                               Douglas Manner, Chief Executive
                                               Officer

Attest:


/s/ Roland E. Sledge
-------------------------------------
Roland E. Sledge, Secretary
<PAGE>

EX-10.22.2 - Cancellation of Investment Banking Consulting Agreement dated March
             30, 2001 between Eurotech, Ltd. and Adolph Komorsky Investments

Real advice for real people
                           ADOLPH KOMORSKY INVESTMENTS
                               MEMBER NASD - SIPC
             660 White Plains Road, Suite 430 o Tarrytown, NY 10591
          Phone: (914) 729-0700 o (800) 849-6167 o Fax: (914) 729-0740
                              www.AKinvestments.com


March 30, 2001

Don V. Hahnfeldt, CEO
Eurotech, Ltd.
10306 Eaton Place, Suite 220
Fairfax, VA 22033


Dear Don:

Current market conditions being what they are, corporate finance activity has
been grinding to a halt all over Wall Street. For this reason, and having no
wish to place undue burden on Eurotech, we feel it necessary to cancel the
investment Banking Consulting Agreement which has existed between our two firms
since January 4, 2001. This would also apply, of course, to the amendment to
said Agreement dated January 18, 2001.

We will continue to monitor the situation, and hopefully we will be able to
revisit the idea of working together in the future. We believe Eurotech to be on
an exciting path, and wish you all the best for success in the future.


Best regards,


/s/ Marc E. Komorsky
-----------------------------------
Marc E. Komorsky
Director
§ 308.526 Computation of time. ( a ) In computing any period of time under this subpart or in an order issued thereunder, the time begins with the day following the act, event, or default, and includes the last day of the period, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday observed by the federal government, in which event it includes the next business day.
( b ) When the period of time allowed is less than 7 days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays observed by the federal government will be excluded from the computation.
( c ) Where a document has been served or issued by placing it in the mail, an additional 5 days will be added to the time permitted for any response.
## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL A PPE ALS OF TEXAS

N O S . W R - 8 8 , 9 6 0 - 0 1 t h r u - 0 4

E X P A R T E J A M E S R A Y S M I T H , A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N S F O R W R I T S O F H A B E A S C O R P U S C A U S E N O S . C R 0 9 - 0 2 5 3 - 0 1 , C R - 0 9 - 0 2 5 4 - 0 1 , C R 0 9 - 0 2 5 5 - 0 1 , & C R 0 9 - 0 2 5 6 - 0 1

I N T H E 4 3 R D D I S T R I C T C O U R T F R O M P A R K E R C O U N T Y Y E A R Y , J . , f

i l e d a d i s s e n t i n g o p i n i o n .

D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N I d i s s e n t f

o r t h e r e a s o n s s t a t e d i n m y d i s s e n t i n g o p i n i o n i n E x p a r t e F o u r n i e r , 4 7 3 S

. W

. 3 d 7 8 9 , 8 0 0

– 8 0 5 ( T e x . C r i m . A p p . 2 0 1 5 )

.

F I L E D : O c t o b e r 3 , 2 0 1 8 D O N O T P U B L I S H
FerroalloyNESHAP--SlagRaking/SkimmingEmissions \yJohnRegoto:ConradChin08/17/201212:59PMCc:ChuckFrench,Jeff.McKinney,lmcafee,RLunnHistory:Thismessagehasbeenforwarded.Conrad:lamrespondingonbehalfofEMItoyourAugust13,2012questionsregardingEMI’sinclusionofslagraking/skimmingfugitiveemissionsinitsJuly2,2012evaluationofanalternativeemissionsreductionapproachbasedonenhancedfugitivesourcecontrols.InupdatingtheEMIemissionsdataset,EMIwassimplytryingtoaddressalloftheemissionsourcesconsideredbyEPAintheoriginaldataset.InEMl’sexperience,slagrakingandotherpost-tapemissionshavebeenconsidered“casting”emissions(see,forexample,FigureVl-1ofthe1974EPAEngineeringStudy),soEMIassumedthatEPAhadincludedslagrakingemissionsinitsairdispersionmodeling.Therefore,EMIincludedsourcecontrolstocapture95%offugitiveslagraking/skimmingparticulateemissionsinEMl’sfugitivesourcecontrolanalysis.EMIalsobelievesthatitsestimateofsuchemissionswasconservative(i.e.,biasedonthehighend)foracoupleofreasons.First,unlikeactualcasting,slagrakingresultsonlyinslagremoval,nota“hotmetaltransfer.”Sinceslagcontainsfarlessmanganesethatthemoltenferroalloy,assuminga41%manganesecontentinsuchemissionsisanoverestimate.Second,byassumingthat100%oftheferroalloysproducedinFurnaces1and12areboth“cast”atthefurnaceand“poured”attheMOR,EMIhaseffectivelydouble-countedthepost-tapemissions.Inreality,theferroalloysproducedatEMIareeithercastatthefurnaceortransferredtoMOPforprocessing,butnotboth.However,sincethepercentageprocessedatMORisvariableandunpredictable,EMIelectedtoavoidapotentialdisagreementregardingtheproperapportionmentbyapplyingaconservativeassumption.Basedonyourindicationthatslagraking/skimmingfugitiveemissionsapparentlywerenotincludedinEPA’smodel,itappearsthatEMI’sinclusionofadditionalsourcecontrolforsuchemissionswouldnotbenecessarytoreducethemodeledemissionsuponwhichEPA’sresidualriskassessmentwasbased.Nevertheless,whilethemanganeseinsuchemissionsisprobablysmall,EMIstillbelievesadditionalsourcecontrolforslagraking/skimmingwouldbebeneficialinreducingvisibleemissionsandwouldthereforepotentiallycontributetoloweropacitymeasurementsattheroofmonitors.Pleaseletmeknowifacalltodiscussthisissuewouldbehelpful.John JcFsJohnRego.Environmental,Health&Safety DAY.901LAKESIDEAVENUECLEVELAND,OHIO44114DIRECT216.586.7542•FAX216.579.0212•JREGO@JONESDAY.COMThise-mail(includinganyattachments)maycontaininformationthatisprivate,confidential,orprotectedbyattorney-clientorotherprivilege,Ifyoureceivedthise-mailinerror,pleasedeleteitfromyoursystemwithoutcopyingitandnotifysenderbyreplye-mail,sothatourrecordscanbecorrected.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24847]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

[OMB Control No. 3206-0034; RI 30-2]


Submission for OMB Review; Request for Review of a Revised 
Information Collection:

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) a request for review of a revised information 
collection. This information collection, ``Annuitant's Report of Earned 
Income'' (OMB Control No. 3206-0034; Form RI 30-2), is used annually to 
determine if disability retirees under age 60 have earned income which 
will result in the termination of their annuity benefits.
    We estimate 21,000 RI 30-2 forms are completed annually. The RI 30-
2 takes approximately 35 minutes to complete for an annual burden of 
12,250 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Cyrus S. Benson by telephone 
(202) 606-4808, FAX (202) 606-0623 or by E-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d291aba0a7a1fc90b7bca1bdbc92bda2bffcb5bda4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="24675d5651570a66414a574b4a644b54490a434b52">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include a mailing address with your 
request.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--

James K. Freiert, Deputy Assistant Director, Retirement Services 
Program, Center for Retirement and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of 
Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC 
20415-3500, and
OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs, Office of 
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, 
NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

    For information regarding administrative coordination contact: 
Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RIS Support Services/
Support Group, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., 
Room 4H28, Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
[FR Doc. E9-24847 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-38-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>