alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016214EN.01000401.xml

| 15.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 June 2016

(2016/C 214/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1225 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,98 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4358 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79478 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3184 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0832 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3655 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,048 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,96 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4332 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5235 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2886 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5277 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4449 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7113 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6022 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5229 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 324,26 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,2368 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4015 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5235 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 992,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6086 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,986 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,3488 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,595 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9273 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,3172 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,5550 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1225

JPY

Japanese yen

118,98

DKK

Danish krone

7,4358

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79478

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3184

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0832

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3655

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,048

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,96

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4332

RON

Romanian leu

4,5235

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2886

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5277

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4449

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7113

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6022

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5229

KRW

South Korean won

1 324,26

ZAR

South African rand

17,2368

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4015

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5235

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 992,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6086

PHP

Philippine peso

51,986

RUB

Russian rouble

74,3488

THB

Thai baht

39,595

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9273

MXN

Mexican peso

21,3172

INR

Indian rupee

75,5550

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         564,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,635,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,447,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,248,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,700
<BONDS>                                      1,775,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,351,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                7,248,0000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               358,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               262,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3011 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 3011

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 1, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 135 East Olive Avenue in Burbank, California, as the ``Bob Hope Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 135 
East Olive Avenue in Burbank, California, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Bob Hope Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Bob Hope Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                                PROMISSORY NOTE

$125,000                                                   Palo Alto, California
                                                                November 7, 1995

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Synplicity, Inc., a California Corporation ("Debtor")
hereby promises to pay Andreas Bechtolsheim ("Lender"), the principal sum of One
Hundred and Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($125,000) with simple interest on the
unpaid advanced principal from the date upon which it was advanced at the rate
of 6.11% per annum, provided that interest shall be compounded annually if it is
not paid as required hereby. All accrued interest shall be paid on December 31
of each year commencing December 31, 1995. Principal and any accrued interest
shall be due and payable on October 31, 2002. This loan may be prepaid at any
time without penalty, with interest payable for the amount of time the loan was
outstanding.

     The makers and endorsers have severally waived presentment for payment,
protest, notice of protest, and notice of non-payment of this Note.

     If one or more of the following events shall have occurred and be
continuing, that is to say:

     (a)  If Debtor (i) shall commence any proceeding or other action relating
to it in bankruptcy or seek reorganization, dissolution, liquidation, winding-
up, or any other relief under the Bankruptcy Code, as amended, or (ii) shall
make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; or

     (b)  If any proceedings are commenced or any other action is taken against
Debtor in bankruptcy or seeking reorganization, liquidation, dissolution,
winding-up, or for any other relief under the Bankruptcy Code, as amended; and
any such event continues for ninety (90) days undismissed or undischarged; or

     (c)  If Debtor shall default in the performance of any of its obligations
under the Note, such default shall have continued unremedied for a period of
thirty (30) days and the obligation is not being contested in good faith by
appropriate legal proceedings;

then the holder of this Note may at any time at such holder's option by written
notice to Debtor declare the principal amount of and accrued interest on this
Note to be immediately payable, without presentment or protest, both of which
are hereby waived by Debtor.

     This Note and the obligations of the Debtor hereunder shall be governed by
and construed in accordance with California law, excluding its choice of law
rules. All reasonable expenses incurred by Lender in connection with the
collection of this Note, including reasonable attorneys' fees, shall be paid by
the Debtor, whether or not suit is filed.

     The obligations owning under this Note shall be subordinate in right of
payment to any and all current and future amounts to be owed by Debtor to any
commercial bank or loan institution.

Debtor:


/s/ Alisa Yaffa              Nov. 7, 1995
----------------------------
Synplicity, Inc.
Alisa Yaffa, Vice President


Lender:

/s/ Andreas Bechtolsheim
----------------------------
Andreas Bechtolsheim
#### LONG v. HILL et al.

No. 30880.

Feb. 1, 1944.

*145 P. 2d 434.*

*464J. Walter Long, Jr., of Okemah, and H. F. Aby, H. L. Fitzgerald, Jr., and W. F. Semple, all of Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Cannon B. McMahan, of Okmulgee, for defendants in error.

Harold E. Rorschach, of Tulsa, and Jack L. Rorschach, of Vinita, for defendant in error Ophelia Sanders, nee Walton.

CORN, C. J.

This action was brought to quiet title to real estate. Judgment in the first instance was rendered for the plaintiff, quieting the title, but thereafter, and within the term at which said judgment was rendered, the court, upon motion of certain defendants in the case, entered an order vacating its former judgment and reopening the case for further pleadings and a new trial.

It is contended by the plaintiff that the trial court abused its discretion in setting aside its former judgment in this case.

In support of this contention the plaintiff asserts that the moving defendants failed to show sufficient grounds for vacating the judgment and reopening the case.

Several grounds for vacating the judgment were set up in the motion to vacate. These were as follows:

> “1. The right of the heirs of Phillip

> Mathews, insane, to redeem the property. That they all had defenses to the original judgment, and were not bound by it for stated reasons.

> “2. That the judgment was void on its face, and that it was the duty of the court to set the same aside.”

The various- defenses and grounds for vacation were set forth in the motions in detail and were .argued to the court in the proceedings to set the judgment aside. We take the view that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in vacating the judgment and reopening the case for a trial upon the issues.

In Montague v. State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land Office et al., 184 Okla. 574, 89 P. 2d 283, in par. 1 of the syllabus, it was held:

> “The district court has full control over its orders or judgments during the term at which they are rendered and may, for sufficient cause shown, in the exercise of its sound discretion, vacate or modify the same, and where motion to vacate or modify is filed during the term aforesaid, the movant is not required to allege or prove a valid cause of action, or defense, as the case may be. Section 556, 558-560, O. S. 1931, 12 Okla. Stat. Ann. §§ 1031, 1033-1035.”

The order vacating judgment is affirmed.

GIBSON, V. C. J., and BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY and OSBORN, JJ., absent.
```

EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eldorado Artesian Springs,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period  ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Douglas Larson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
USC SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Douglas Larson
------------------
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 18, 2005
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                           4,216
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                   52,548
<ALLOWANCES>                     7,881
<INVENTORY>                     25,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                76,544
<PP&E>                           7,225
<DEPRECIATION>                   2,737
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  91,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           41,762
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                            69
<OTHER-SE>                      45,496
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    91,806
<SALES>                        173,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               173,281
<CGS>                          133,718
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   31,509
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               2,140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  5,644
<INCOME-TAX>                     1,523
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              4,121
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                     4,121
<EPS-BASIC>                       0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                     0.78


</TABLE>
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09475**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 09475_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09475_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 09475_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09475_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09475_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09475_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09475_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09475_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

Certification Statement Plant ID 09475.pdf Plant certification statement x 09475_EQM ZMS 005 TIE and Clarifier Effluent 5_23_2002.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09475_Orbital Eng Mass FGD Mass Flow Study 2_11_00.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09475_Orbital Eng ZMS FGD Sludge and Dewatering 1_17_2002.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09475_Orbital Report Text 1_17_02.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09475_Outfall 005 Final Summary Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09475_WH Zimmer Site Location Map A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x W H Zimmer A5-3 and D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 41]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ041.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 233]]

Public Law 110-41
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To amend title 4, United States Code, to authorize the Governor of a 
 State, territory, or possession of the United States to order that the 
   National flag be flown at half-staff in that State, territory, or 
  possession in the event of the death of a member of the Armed Forces 
  from that State, territory, or possession who dies while serving on 
           active duty. <<NOTE: June 29, 2007 -  [H.R. 692]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Army Specialist 
Joseph P. Micks Federal Flag Code Amendment Act of 2007. 4 USC 1 
note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Army Specialist Joseph P. Micks 
Federal Flag Code Amendment Act of 2007''.
SEC. 2. FINDING. <<NOTE: 4 USC 7 note.>> 

    Congress finds that members of the Armed Forces of the United States 
defend the freedom and security of the United States.
SEC. 3. PROCEDURE FOR NATIONAL FLAG TO BE FLOWN AT HALF-STAFF IN 
                    THE EVENT OF THE DEATH OF A MEMBER OF THE 
                    ARMED FORCES.

    (a) Issuance of Proclamation.--Subsection (m) of section 7 of title 
4, United States Code, is amended in the sixth sentence--
            (1) by inserting ``or the death of a member of the Armed 
        Forces from any State, territory, or possession who dies while 
        serving on active duty'' after ``present or former official of 
        the government of any State, territory, or possession of the 
        United States''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period the following: ``, and 
        the same authority is provided to the Mayor of the District of 
        Columbia with respect to present or former officials of the 
        District of Columbia and members of the Armed Forces from the 
        District of Columbia''.

    (b) Federal Facility Consistency With Proclamation.--Such subsection 
is further amended by inserting after the sixth sentence the following 
new sentence: ``When the Governor of a State, territory, or possession, 
or the Mayor of the District of Columbia, issues a proclamation under 
the preceding sentence that the National flag be flown at half-staff in 
that State, territory, or possession or in the District of Columbia 
because of the death of a member of the Armed Forces, the National flag 
flown at any Federal installation or facility in the area covered by 
that

[[Page 121 STAT. 234]]

proclamation shall be flown at half-staff consistent with that 
proclamation.''.

    Approved June 29, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 692 (S. 720):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110-139 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            May 15, considered and passed House.
            June 14, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3228 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3228

 To withdraw normal trade relations treatment from the products of the 
                      People's Republic of China.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2003

 Mr. Sanders (for himself, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Goode, 
Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Michaud, Mr. Taylor of Mississippi, Mr. Hinchey, 
Mr. Clay, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Strickland, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Kucinich, Mr. 
 Lipinski, Mr. Filner, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Taylor of North Carolina, Mr. 
    Visclosky, Mr. Green of Texas, Mr. Evans, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. 
  Peterson of Minnesota, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Capuano, Mr. 
Costello, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Coble, Mr. 
Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Towns, and Mr. Baca) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To withdraw normal trade relations treatment from the products of the 
                      People's Republic of China.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WITHDRAWAL OF NORMAL TRADE RELATIONS TREATMENT FROM THE 
              PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA.

    Notwithstanding the provisions of title I of Public Law 106-286, 
title IV of the Trade Act of 1974, or any other provision of law, 
effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, normal trade 
relations treatment shall not apply to the products of the People's 
Republic of China, and normal trade relations treatment may not 
thereafter be extended to the products of that country.
                                 <all>
```
# o Afi'iMENTO F .iPORWipN, , : l U rERf'f l iONc : 120 0 Ne w jerse yAvenue , S E US

. Departmen t O

f Ttansportatio n Washington , D C 2059 0 Offic e O f th e Secretar

y':^j i ;JJ 3 ~ M P 2 = O U ofTransportatkx i Augus t 4 , 201 1 B Y FAX : (808 ) 837-786 7 Mr
. Richar dSchuman Presiden t Schuma n Aviatio n Company , Ltd
. 13 0 lolan aPlac e Honolulu , Hawai i 9681 9 Re : Docke t DOT-OST-2010-000 6 Applicatio n o f

Schuma n Aviatio n Company , Ltd
. for Commute r

Ai r Carrie r Authority Dea r Mr
. Schuman : Thi s respond s t o you r

lette r of Augus t 3 requestin g a20-da y extensio n o f tim e i n whic h t o fulfil l th e condition s i n Fina l Orde r 2010-8-1 , issue dAugus t 6 , 2010 , tha t

require s Schuma n Aviatio n Company , Ltd
. ("Schuma n Aviation" ) t o commenc e schedule d passenge r operation s a s acommute r ai r carrie r withi n on e year

o f that date
. Th e effectivenes s of

thi s authority wa s conditione dupo n Schuma n Aviatio n fulfillin g a numbe r o f conditions , includin g providin g (1 ) acop y of th e ai r carrier' s Ai r

Carrie r Certificat e an dOperatio n Specification s fro mth e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ("FAA" ) evidencin g that

th e ai r carrie r ha s acquire dFA A safet

y authority authorizin g it t o commenc e schedule dpassenge r operations , (2 ) evidenc e of liability insuranc e coverage that meet s th e requirement s of sectio n 205.5(b ) for

al l it s aircraft , (3 ) astatemen t o f an y change s i t ha s undergon e i n area s affectin g it s fitnes s subsequen t t o th e issuanc e dat e of

th e Sho w Caus e Orde r

i n thi s cas e (Orde r

2010-6-17) , an d(4 ) update dfinancial informatio n an devidenc e tha t

th e ai r carrie r stil l ha s availabl e t o it fund s sufficient

t o mee t th e Department' s financial fitnes s criteria
. Afte r reviewing th e informatio n yo u submitte di n support of an extension , w e hav e conclude dthat

ther e i s goo dcaus e t o gran t you r request . Therefore , w e gran t Schuma n Aviation' s reques t

for a n extension
. Accordingly , Schuma n Aviatio n no w ha s unti l Augus t 26 , 2011 , t o mak e it s conmiute r authority effective
.I

f yo u hav e any question s concernin g thi s matter , pleas e contac t Damo n Walke r

of my staf f o n (202 ) 366-7785
. Sincerely ,

Laii^al} ^ J
. Rem o Chief , Ai r Carrie r Fitnes s Divisio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s

cc : Docke t

DOT-OST-2010-000 6 Mr
. Gin o D
. Rezzonic o PO I for Schuma n Aviatio n