alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 192.250 Compliance with proxy solicitation provisions. ( a ) *Savings association compliance.* A savings association must comply with these proxy solicitation provisions when it provides proxy solicitation material to members for the meeting to vote on the plan of conversion.
( b ) *Member compliance.* Members of the savings association must comply with these proxy solicitation provisions when they provide proxy solicitation materials to members for the meeting to vote on the conversion, pursuant to § 192.280, except where: ( 1 ) The member solicits 50 people or fewer and does not solicit proxies on the savings association's behalf; or
( 2 ) The member solicits proxies through newspaper advertisements after the savings association's board of directors adopts the plan of conversion. Any newspaper advertisements may include only the following information: ( i ) The name of the savings association;
( ii ) The reason for the advertisement;
( iii ) The proposal or proposals to be voted upon;
( iv ) Where a member may obtain a copy of the proxy solicitation material; and
( v ) A request for the savings association's members to vote at the meeting.
# C_2022034EN.01000101.xml

| 24.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

21 January 2022

(2022/C 34/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1348 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,14 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4431 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83633 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4140 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0353 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 145,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0523 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,347 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 358,19 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5318 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9453 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,2230 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5774 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4211 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8370 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6884 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5260 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 351,89 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,1546 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1946 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5280 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 244,20 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7508 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,171 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 86,8380 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,358 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,2063 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,2229 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,4190 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1348

JPY

Japanese yen

129,14

DKK

Danish krone

7,4431

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83633

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4140

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0353

ISK

Iceland króna

145,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0523

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,347

HUF

Hungarian forint

358,19

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5318

RON

Romanian leu

4,9453

TRY

Turkish lira

15,2230

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5774

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4211

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8370

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6884

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5260

KRW

South Korean won

1 351,89

ZAR

South African rand

17,1546

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1946

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5280

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 244,20

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7508

PHP

Philippine peso

58,171

RUB

Russian rouble

86,8380

THB

Thai baht

37,358

BRL

Brazilian real

6,2063

MXN

Mexican peso

23,2229

INR

Indian rupee

84,4190

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


We consent to the use in this  Registration  Statement  on Form  10-KSB/A of our
report  included  herein  dated March 20,  2000,  relating  to the  consolidated
financial statements of Medsearch Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries.









Kempisty & Company
Certified Public Accountants PC
New York, NY
July 24, 2000
§ 390.411 Offering circular requirement. ( a ) *General.* No State savings association shall offer or sell, directly or indirectly, any security issued by it unless: ( 1 ) The offer or sale is accompanied or preceded by an offering circular which includes the information required by this subpart and which has been filed and declared effective pursuant to this subpart; or
( 2 ) An exemption is available under this subpart.
( b ) *Communications not deemed an offer.* The following communications shall not be deemed an offer under this subpart: ( 1 ) Prior to filing an offering circular, any notice of a proposed offering which satisfies the requirements of Commission Rule 135 (17 CFR 230.135) under the Securities Act;
( 2 ) Subsequent to filing an offering circular, any notice circular, advertisement, letter, or other communication published or transmitted to any person which satisfies the requirements of Commission Rule 134 (17 CFR 230.134) under the Securities Act; and
( 3 ) Oral offers of securities covered by an offering circular made after filing the offering circular with the FDIC.
( c ) *Preliminary offering circular.* Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, a preliminary offering circular may be used for an offer of any security prior to the effective date of the offering circular if: ( 1 ) The preliminary offering circular has been filed pursuant to this subpart;
( 2 ) The preliminary offering circular includes the information required by this subpart, except for the omission of information relating to offering price, discounts or commissions, amount of proceeds, conversion rates, call prices, or other matters dependent on the offering price; and
( 3 ) The offering circular declared effective by the FDIC is furnished to the purchaser prior to, or simultaneously with, the sale of any such security.
#### CHARLES J. LARKEY, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF BAYONNE, THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, AND JOHN F. LEE, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, DEFENDANTSAPPELLANTS.

Argued October 23, 1939

Decided January 25, 1940.

For the appellants, *William, Rubin.*

For the respondent, *Alfred Brenner.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

We concur in the views expressed by Mr. Justice Bodine for the Supreme Court.

It suffices to add, in response to the arguments so vigorously pressed here, that, since local boards of health are continuous bodies *(Bodnar*v. *Board of Health of Carteret,*14 *N. J. Mis. R.*318; *affirmed,*117 *N. J. L.*527), the transfer of the appointive function to the non-continuing governing bodies of commission-governed municipalities did not serve to vary the quality of the power, *i. e.,*to set up two radically different classes in respect of the limitation of the tenure, with no basis of distinction save the general form of the municipal government. The question in the final analysis is one of legislative intent; and we do not discern a purpose to modify in this substantial particular the general appointing power bestowed upon local boards of health when that function is under the statute exercised by the governing bodies of commission-governed municipalities. Such lack of *173uniformity is not to be imputed to the legislature in the absence of explicit provision therefor.

Judgment affirmed.

*For affirmance*—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 13.

*For reversal*— None.
**Exhibit 12.2**
I, Giuseppe Desantis*,*certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Natuzzi S.p.A.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant andhave:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the company, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by theannual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controlsover financial reporting.      /s/ Giuseppe Desantis  Giuseppe Desantis  General Manager (principal financial officer)
§ 70.72 Types of transportation. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 88 FR 10037 , Feb. 16, 2023.
Cross Reference
This amendment was delayed until Feb. 16, 2025, at 88 FR 90120 , Dec. 29, 2023.
The following types of transportation may be provided by VA facilities through VTS: ( a ) *Door-to-door service.* VA facilities may use VTS to transport, on a scheduled or unscheduled basis, eligible persons between a VA or VA-authorized facility and their residence or a place where the person is staying. VA facilities may use VTS to transport eligible persons to and from a VA or VA-authorized facility and another location identified by the person when it is financially favorable to the government to do so.
( b ) *Travel to and from designated locations.* VA facilities may use VTS to provide transportation between a VA or VA-authorized facility and a designated location in the community on a scheduled basis.
( c ) *Service between VA facilities.* VA facilities may use VTS to provide scheduled or unscheduled transportation between VA or VA-authorized health care facilities. This includes travel from one building to another within a single VA campus.
( d ) *Other locations.* VA facilities may use VTS to provide scheduled or unscheduled transportation to and/or from a VA or VA-authorized facility or other places when a VA clinician has determined that such transportation of the veteran, servicemember, their attendant(s), or CHAMPVA beneficiary receiving benefits through the CITI program would be needed to promote, preserve, or restore the health of the individual and is in accord with generally accepted standards of medical practice, as defined in 38 CFR 17.38(b).
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 111A, 501, 1718, 7301)
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3175 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3175

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 2650 Cleveland Avenue, NW in Canton, Ohio, as the ``Richard D. 
                    Watkins Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 2003

 Mr. Regula (for himself, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Portman, Mr. Brown of Ohio, 
Mr. Gillmor, Mr. Oxley, Mr. Turner of Ohio, Mr. Hobson, Mr. LaTourette, 
   Mr. Boehner, Mr. Strickland, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Kucinich, Ms. 
Kaptur, Mr. Ney, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. Chabot, and Mrs. Jones of Ohio) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 2650 Cleveland Avenue, NW in Canton, Ohio, as the ``Richard D. 
                    Watkins Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RICHARD D. WATKINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2650 Cleveland Avenue, NW in Canton, Ohio, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Richard D. Watkins Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Richard D. 
Watkins Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CNE Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony S. Conigliaro,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      /s/ Anthony S. Conigliaro
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Anthony S. Conigliaro
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2004
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 194 (Thursday, October 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 62044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25408]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 20 October 2011, at 10 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, 
NW., Washington DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: http://www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding 
the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by e-mailing staff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated: September 27, 2011 in Washington DC.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary
[FR Doc. 2011-25408 Filed 10-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C 20460 

JUL - 5 2011 


Mr. OFFICE 0'" Art Graham AIR ,;rlD RAD!A·IO.... 

Chairman 

State of Florida Public Service Commission 

Capital Office Service Center 

2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard 

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0850 

Dear Mr. Graham: 

Thank you for your letter of May 12, 2011, requesting an extension of the public comment period for the 

proposed "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) from Coal- and Oilfired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired 

Electric Utility, Industrial-Commercial-Institutional, and Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional 

Steam Generating Units" (the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards rule), which was published in the 

Federal Register on May 3, 2011. The proposal identified a public comment period of 60 days; that 

period would have ended on July 5, 2011. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, however, 

recently announced an extension of the comment period by 30 days to August 4. 

While we are extending the comment period, we are not seeking to extend the 

November 16,2011, deadline for signature of the final rule, and remain committed to meeting that 

deadline. 

The 30-day extension will provide the public with a 140-day period to review the proposal. As you 

know, interested parties were aware of the posting on March 16, 2011, of the signed proposal on the 

EPA's website (http://www.epa.gov/ttnJatw/utility/utilitypg.html), along with much of the pertinent 

supporting documentation (including the analyses used in establishing the proposed emission limits and 

the technical support documents). The proposal was published a little over six weeks later, on May 3, 

marking the beginning of the formal public comment period. This will provide the public with 

approximately 140 days to review and provide written comments on the proposed rule and supporting 

documents. It will also provide at least 60 days for other documentation that was not posted on the 

website until after the proposed rule was signed. Due to the substantive issues specific to this 

rulemaking, this comment period is significantly longer than statutorily required . 

Again, thank you for your letter. We look forward to the timely receipt of your comments. 

Sincerely, 

Gina McCarthy 

Assistant Administrator 

Internel Address IURL) • http I/www epa gov 

Recycled/Recyclable · Pnnteo Wllh Vegetable 011 Based Inks on 100"" Postcorsumer. Process ChlOrine Free Recycleo Pape
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2010041EN.01000301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/3 |

---

Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV of the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty — General Block Exemption Regulation)

2010/C 41/03

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aid No | GBER 13/2009/R&D-TRA | | |
| Member State | Romania | | |
| Member State reference number | 2008/111257 (IN case number) | | |
| Region | Name of the region (NUTS) North-East Romania | Regional aid status Article 87(3)(a) of the Treaty | |
| Granting authority | Name | Innovation Norway | |
| Address Web page | | | | --- | | Akersgt 13 | | 0158 Oslo | | NORWAY | | http://www.norwaygrants.org | | |
| Title of the aid measure | The Norwegian cooperation programme for economic growth and sustainable development in Romania | | |
| National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication) | EEA Enlargement http://www.efta.int/content/legal-texts/eea-enlargement/EEAEnlargementAgreementmaintextEN.pdf Romania/Bulgaria enlargement http://www.efta.int/content/legal-texts/eea-enlargement/agreement-2007 | | |
| Web link to the full text of the aid measure | http://www.norwaygrants.org | | |
| | Ad hoc aid — yes | Name of the beneficiary Euromedica SA, Romania | |
| Date of granting | Ad hoc aid | 19.3.2009 | |
| Economic sectors | Limited to specific sectors — Please specify in accordance with NACE Rev. 2. | Sustainable production | |
| Type of beneficiary | SME | Yes | |
| Large enterprises | No | |
| Overall amount of the ad hoc aid awarded to the undertaking | EUR 1,16 million | |
| Aid instrument (Article 5) | Grant | | Yes |
| Repayable advances | | Yes |

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| General objectives | Objectives 1.Experimental development2.General training | Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in national currency | SME-bonuses in % |
| | Experimental development (Article 31(2)(c)) | 25 % | 10 % |
| | General training (Article 38(2)) | 60 % | |

---
§ 348.7 Change in circumstances. ( a ) *Termination.* A management official shall terminate his or her service or apply for an exemption if a change in circumstances causes the service to become prohibited. A change in circumstances may include an increase in asset size of an organization, a change in the delineation of the RMSA or community, the establishment of an office, an increase in the aggregate deposits of the depository organization, or an acquisition, merger, consolidation, or reorganization of the ownership structure of a depository organization that causes a previously permissible interlock to become prohibited.
( b ) *Transition period.* A management official described in paragraph (a) of this section may continue to serve the FDIC-supervised institution involved in the interlock for 15 months following the date of the change in circumstances. The FDIC may shorten this period under appropriate circumstances.
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 7 /29/15 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR – 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Discussion of the Clean Power Plan at the Tennessee Environmental Conference **SUMMARY :**  

### Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to participants at the Tennessee Environmental Conference in Kingsport , TN, on March 17, 2015 . The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES: EPA**  Beverly Ba nister /EPA R4 **External Stakeholders** Approximately 4 0 attendees. **ATTACHMENT**
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 317 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 317

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, 
      relating to a rural access project in Mt. Vernon, Illinois.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2003

 Mr. Shimkus introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, 
      relating to a rural access project in Mt. Vernon, Illinois.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That item 32 in the 
table contained in section 1106(a)(2) of the Intermodal Surface 
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2038) is amended by 
striking ``Extension of 34th Street from IL Rt. 15 to County Road 10'' 
and inserting ``Improvements of Wells Bypass (45th Street)''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 238.101 Authority and purpose.

This subpart implements section 10(f) of HOLA which requires savings associations with holding companies to provide the Board not less than 30 days' notice of a proposed declaration of a dividend. This subpart applies to all declarations of dividends by a subsidiary savings association of a savings and loan holding company.