alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 404.18 Schedule of fees. ( a ) *Search and review.* Ex-Im Bank shall not charge for search and review.
( b ) *Duplication.* Ex-Im Bank shall charge $.10 per page for paper copy duplication. Ex-Im Bank shall charge the actual or estimated cost of copies prepared by computer, such as tape or printouts, or for other methods of reproduction or duplication.
( c ) *Minimum fee.* Ex-Im Bank shall waive final fees of $5.00 or less.
( d ) *Fee waivers.* Ex-Im Bank may waive fees whenever it is determined to be in the public interest. Fees of less than $50.00 shall be waived in connection with any request by an employee, former employee or applicant for employment, related to a grievance or complaint of discrimination against Ex-Im Bank.
( e ) *Special services charges.* Complying with requests for special services such as those listed in this paragraph is entirely at the discretion of Ex-Im Bank. Ex-Im Bank shall recover the full costs of providing such services to the extent that it elects to provide them. ( 1 ) *Certifications.* Ex-Im Bank shall charge $25.00 to certify the authenticity of any Ex-Im Bank record or any copy of such record.
( 2 ) *Special shipping.* Ex-Im Bank may ship by special means (e.g., express mail) if the requester so desires, provided that the requester has paid or has expressly undertaken to pay all costs of such special services. Ex-Im Bank shall not charge for ordinary packaging and mailing.
[64 FR 14374, Mar. 25, 1999. Redesignated at 87 FR 41034, July 11, 2022]
#### WARREN, EXECUTRIX, v. UNITED STATES

[68 C. Cls. 634; 281 U. S. 739]

Petition for writ of certiorari was *denied*by the Supreme Court April 21, 1930.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6341

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. ROBERT L. MACK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (3:91-cr-00049-RLV-30; 3:07-cv-00526-RLV) Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: May 30, 2008 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert L. Mack, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert L. Mack seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mack has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Mack’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.10

                          ELEPHANT & CASTLE GROUP, INC.
                                 Lease Abstract


1.       PROJECT:              Yorkdale Shopping Centre, Yorkdale (Toronto)

2.       TENANT:               Canadian Rainforest Restaurants, Inc.

3.       STORE AREA:           Unspecified Gross Leasable Area of not less
                               than 20,000 square feet

4.       TRADE NAME:           Rainforest Cafe

5.       USE:                  For the operation of a traditional "Rainforest
                               Cafe" restaurant.

6.       TERM:                 15 years

7.       TERM START
           DATE:               December 1, 1998

8.       TERM EXPIRY
           DATE:               November 30, 2013

9.       EXTENSION             First Extension Term:  5 years
           PERIODS:            Second Extension Term:  5 years

10.      GROSS RENT:           Can $53.64 per sf per annum of the EXACT Gross
                               Leasable Area of the Store.

11.      PERCENTAGE            5.00% of Gross Revenue, $33.33 per square
           RENT:               foot per annum and the amount of Realty Taxes
                               (other   than  any  Initial   Business   Tax
                               Component)  payable by Tenant under  Section
                               3.3, all as provided  under Section 3.2. For
                               the  purpose  of this key  data  item 11 and
                               section  3.2,  the  "Artificial  Gross Rent"
                               means the Gross Leasable Area of the Store.

12.      PREPAID RENT:         Nil

13.      SECURITY
         DEPOSIT:              Nil

14.      INITIAL PRO-
         MOTION CHARGE:        Nil

15.      FIXTURING
         PERIOD:               180 Days

16.      PLAN REVIEW CHARGE:   Nil
<PAGE>

17.      LANDLORD ADDRESS:     c/o 20 Vic Management Inc.
                               20 Victoria Street, Suite 900
                               Toronto, Ontario
                               M5C 2N8

18.      GUARANTOR:            None

19.      PROPERTY MANAGER:     Vic Management Inc.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1 Names of Members of the Corporate Assembly The Corporate Assembly currently consists of 18 members. 12 members elected by the annual general meeting of shareholders:
Aase Gudding Gresvig
Westye Høegh
Idar Kreutzer
Astrid Sylvi Lem
Karen Helene Midelfart
Anne Merete Steensland
Sigurd Støren
Sten-Arthur Sælør
Siri Teigum
Svein Steen Thomassen
Lars Tronsgaard
Svein Aaser 6 members elected by the employees of Hydros Norwegian companies:
Solveig Alne Frøynes
Kjell Kvinge
Jon-Arne Mo
John-Arne Nilsen
Rune Strande
Ingar Aas-Haug Observers:
Sónia F. T. Gjesdal
Sven Edin
Billy Fredagsvik Deputy members for members elected by the annual general meeting:
Anne-Margrethe Firing
Wolfgang Ruch
Terje Venold
Erik Garaas Deputy members for members elected by the employees:
Erna Flattum Berg
Odd Arne Fodnes
Oddny Grebstad
Stig Lima
Line Melkild
Bjørn Nedreaas 99.1-1
##### 

##### U.S. Geological SurveyOpen-File Report 2006-1042Version 1.0

# Gravity and Magnetic Data in the Vicinity of Virgin Valley, Southern Nevada

### *By* Robert L. Morin

##### 2006

| *Isostatic gravity map of Virgin Valley (from figure 2)* |
|----------------------------------------------------------|

| Gravity and magnetic data were collected in the vicinity of Virgin Valley to help better characterize the buried sedimentary Mesquite and Mormon basins. Detailed gravity measurements were made over the buried saddle between the Mesquite and Mormon basins, discovered by earlier gravity studies, in order to calculate the depth to pre-Cenozoic basement. The purpose of this study was to provide estimates of sedimentary fill in this area prior to drilling a water well on Mormon Mesa. The calculated depth-to-basement results in an estimate of about 1.5 km of alluvial fill in this area. Additional gravity data were collected to help better define the shape and magnitude of the anomaly associated with the Mesquite Basin. Testing of an experimental towed magnetometer was also carried out, which showed very good correlation with an existing aeromagnetic survey. |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Download this report as an 18-page PDF document (of2006-1042.pdf; 10.1 MB)

Go to the data folder that contains ASCII files (gravity-data.txt, mesquite-mag-data.txt, and mormon-mesa-mag-data.txt; 864 KB total)

Go to the eps folder that contains Encapulated PostScript (.eps) versions of the nine figures.  These are the original high-quality vector files that were downsampled for the text (41.2 MB total)

For questions about the content of this report, contact Bob Morin.

Version history

----

Adobe Reader for free

| Help   | PDF help   | Publications main page | Open-File   Reports for 2006 || Privacy   Statement | Disclaimer   | Accessibility || Geologic   Division | Geophysical Unit of Menlo Park, Calif. (GUMP)   |This report is available only on the Web| Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey |URL of this page: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1042/Maintained by: Michael DigglesDate created: February 21, 2006Date last modified: February 21, 2006 (mfd)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.167

June 28, 2000

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

Gentlemen:

We have read Item 4 of Form 8-K dated June 28, 2000, of Wilshire Technologies,
Inc. and are in agreement with the statements contained in the fourth paragraph
on page herein. We have no basis to agree or disagree with other statements of
the registrant contained therein.

                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
§ 269b.740 Service of pleading and other paper; statement of service. ( a ) *Method of service.* Notices of hearings, decisions, orders, and other papers may be served personally or by registered or certified mail or by telegraph.
( b ) *Upon whom served.* Unless otherwise provided in the rules and regulations in this subchapter, all papers except complaints, petitions, and papers relating to requests for appearance or production of documents, shall be served upon all counsel of record and upon parties not represented by counsel or by their agents designated by them or by law and upon the panel, or its designated officers or agents, where appropriate. Service upon such counsel or representative shall constitute service upon the party, but a copy also shall be transmitted to the party.
( c ) *Proof of service.* The party or person serving the papers or process shall submit simultaneously to the panel or its designated representative, or the individual conducting the proceeding, a written statement of such service. Failure to file a statement of service shall not affect the validity of the service. Proof of service, except where otherwise provided, shall be required only if subsequent to the receipt of a statement of service a question is raised with respect to proper service.
#### § 334.2 Examples.

The examples in this part are not exclusive. Compliance with an example, to the extent applicable, constitutes compliance with this part. Examples in a paragraph illustrate only the issue described in the paragraph and do not illustrate any other issue that may arise in this part.
## Williams , Rene e (OST) 'hocJCf. l ^T-flST ^ /^S^-^S'7 4 Subject : FW : Etha nan d AudreyJone s e-mail

- CZ Nessentia l ai r servic e
Origina l Messag e From : nlarson@mosquitonet.co m[mailto:nlarson@mosquitonet.com ] Sent : Friday , Apri l 02 , 201 0 10:4 2 AM To : Little , Cynthi a M (DOT ) Subject : Etha nan

d Audre yDone s e-mail

- CZ Nessentia l ai r servic e Regardin g Chisan a (CZN ) essentia l ai r servic e Essentia l ai r servic e i s s o veryver yimportan t t o u s a s senior s o n a fixe d income . Havin g n o road acces s w e depend upo nessentia l ai r servic e fo r mai l an d supplie s bu t mos t o f al l fo r medica l attention . Ou r littl e communit yi s experiencin g a ne wgrowt hspurt . Essentia l ai r servic e wil l playa n importan t rol e i n ou r newcomers ' plans . W e ar e s o please d wit h4 0 Mil e Air' s service . W e urg e yo u t o kee p th e statu s quo . Etha nand Audre yDone s P O Bo xCZ N Tok , AK 9978 0 (907)734-223 7
**Year Quarter** **Operating No. of Periods** **Percent of Time Hours** **> 20% Opacity > 20% Opacity**  2008 1 2,064 145 0.703 2008 2 2,121 32 0.151 2008 3 2,098 12 0.057 2008 4 2,024 12 0.059 **Total 8,307**  **201 Average**  **2,076.8 50.25**  **0.242**

2009 1 2,039 16 0.078 2009 2 2,001 50 0.250 2009 3 1,727 8 0.046 2009 4 1,455 3 0.021 **Total 7,222**  **77 Average**  **1805.5 19.25**  **0.107**

2010 1 2,060 76 0.369 2010 2 2,184 2 0.009 2010 3 2,145 360 1.678 20104 2,148 7 0.033 **Total 8,537**  **445 Average**  **2,134.25 111.25**  **0.521**



# M.R. Young Station **Unit 1 3-Year**  **8,022 241**  **0.300**

**Average**
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<Table>
<Caption>
            Name                                              Jurisdiction of Organization
            ----                                              ----------------------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Bell Microproducts Canada Inc.                                         California
Bell Microproducts Canada--Tenex Data ULC                              Nova Scotia
Bell Microproducts--Future Tech, Inc.                                   California
Don Bell Microproducts Chile, S.A.                                       Chile
Bell Microproducts do Brasil, Ltda.                                      Brazil
Bell Microproducts Limited                                           United Kingdom
Ideal Hardware Limited                                               United Kingdom
Ideal Hardware (Europe) Limited                                      United Kingdom
Logical Online Limited                                               United Kingdom
Unifund Limited                                                      United Kingdom
Ideal UniSolve Limited                                               United Kingdom
Rorke Data, Inc.                                                       Minnesota
Rorke Data Europe Holding B.V.                                        Netherlands
Rorke Data Europe B.V.                                                Netherlands
Rorke Data Europe Realty B.V.                                         Netherlands
Rorke Data Italy s.r.l.                                                  Italy
Bell Microproducts Europe Inc.                                         California
Bell Microproducts Europe Limited                                    United Kingdom
</Table>
#### EX PARTE HOLLEY.

(Decided April 17, 1913.

Rehearing denied May 18, 1913.)

Original petition in Court of Appeals.

Denson & Denson, and Evins & Jack, for appellant. McKinley, McQueen, Hawkins & Snow, and A. G. & E. D. Smith, for appellee.

Walker, P. J. —

Petition dismissed on authority of *Ex parte Dew, 7*Ala. App. 437, 62 South. 261.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6902

OMAR I H. PATTON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CRYSTAL KIMBLE , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Elkins

. John Preston Bailey , District Judge. ( 2:16

- cv - 00010

- JPB

- MJA )

Submitted : May 11, 2021 Decided: May 13, 2021

Before KING, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Omari H. Patton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Omari H. Patton appeals the district court’s order , entered upon remand from this court, see Patton v. Kimble , 717 F. App’x 271, 272 (4th Cir. 2018) (No. 17

- 7032), granting Federal Corrections Officer Crystal Kimble ’s motion for summary judgment in Patton’s civil rights action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents o f Fed

. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The sole issue remaining after we ruled in Patton’s prior appeal, see Patton , 717 F. App’x at 272, was Patton’s claim that Kimble violated the First Amendment by retaliating against Patton for filing admini strative grievances. On remand, the district court analyzed th e issue pursuant to Ziglar v. Abassi , 137 S. Ct. 1843 (2017), and ruled that the implied

- damages remedy recognized in Bivens d oes not extend to First Amendment retaliation claims such as the on e Patton advanced.
We recently addressed this issue in Earle v. Shreve s , * holding that the Bivens remedy may not “ be extended to include a federal inmate ’ s claim that prison officials violated his First Amendment rights by retaliating against him for filing grievances. ” 990 F.3d 774, 776 (4th Cir. 2021). Earle thus confirms the propriety of the district court’s dispositive ruling . Accordingly, w e affirm the district court ’s order granting summary judgment to Kimble. Patton v. Kimble , No. 2:16

- cv - 00 010

- JPB

- MJA (N.D.W. Va. June 17, 2019)

.

* We held this appeal in abeyance pending the disposition in Earle

.3 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1418

BARBARA S. MINNICH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN M. DEUTCH, Director, Central Intelligence

Agency,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District

Judge. (CA-95-1340-A)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 28, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barbara S. Minnich, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Celia Ballow, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

without prejudice Appellant's Privacy Act (5 U.S.C.A. § 552a (West

Supp. 1996)) action. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Minnich v. Deutch,

No. CA-95-1340-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 30, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alliance Financial
Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Jack H. Webb, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge: (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:
November 8, 2006 /s/ Jack H.
  WebbName: Jack
  H. WebbTitle:
  Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer 35
§ 390.421 Securities sale report. ( a ) Within 30 days after the first sale of the securities, every six months after such 30 day period and not later than 30 days after the later of the last sale of securities in an offering pursuant to § 390.411 or the application of the proceeds therefrom, the issuer shall file with the FDIC a report describing the results of the sale of the securities and the application of the proceeds, which shall include all of the information required by Form G-12 set forth at § 390.429 and shall also include the following: ( 1 ) The name, address, and docket number of the issuer;
( 2 ) The title, number, aggregate and per-unit offering price of the securities sold;
( 3 ) The aggregate and per-unit dollar amounts of actual itemized expenses, discounts or commissions, and other fees;
( 4 ) The aggregate and per-unit dollar amounts of the net proceeds raised, and the use of proceeds therefrom; and
( 5 ) The number of purchasers of each class of securities sold and the number of owners of record of each class of the issuer's equity securities after the issuance of the securities or termination of the offer.
( b ) Within 30 days after the first sale of the securities, every six months after the first sale of the securities and not later than 30 days after the last sale of securities in an offering pursuant to § 390.413, the issuer shall file with the FDIC a report describing the results of the sale of securities, which shall include all of the information required by Form G-12 set forth at § 390.429, and shall also include the following: ( 1 ) All of the information required by paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) A detailed statement of the factual and legal grounds for the exemption claimed.
§ 41.83 Proper disposal of records containing consumer information. ( a ) *Definitions as used in this section.* ( 1 ) *Consumer* means an individual.
( 2 ) *Federal savings association* means a Federal savings association or an operating subsidiary of a Federal savings association.
( 3 ) *National bank* means a national bank, an operating subsidiary of a national bank, or a Federal branch or agency of a foreign bank.
( b ) *In general.* Each national bank or Federal savings association must properly dispose of any consumer information that it maintains or otherwise possesses in accordance with the Interagency Guidelines Establishing Information Security Standards, as set forth in appendix B to 12 CFR part 30, to the extent that the bank or savings association is covered by the scope of the Guidelines.
( c ) *Rule of construction.* Nothing in this section shall be construed to: ( 1 ) Require a national bank or Federal savings association to maintain or destroy any record pertaining to a consumer that is not imposed under any other law; or
( 2 ) Alter or affect any requirement imposed under any other provision of law to maintain or destroy such a record.
[79 FR 28400, May 16, 2014]