alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFFIRMED as MODIFIED and Opinion Filed August 28, 2024 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00651-CR 

GONZALO BUSTOS, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F22-56768-K 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia 

Opinion by Justice Garcia 

Appellant was indicted for aggravated robbery but the jury found him guilty 

of the lesser-included offense of robbery. The jury assessed punishment at twentytwo years in prison and a $5000 fine. 

In a single issue, appellant argues the Court should modify the judgment to 

reflect the correct statute for the offense. The State agrees, and in a cross-point, 

argues the judgment should also be modified to reflect the correct name of the 

prosecutor. 

We sustain appellant’s issue and the State’s cross-point and modify the 

judgment as requested. As modified, the judgment is affirmed. 
 –2– 

We may modify a judgment to make the record speak the truth when we have 

the information necessary to do so. See Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27–28 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30 (Tex. App.—Dallas 

1991, pet. ref’d); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b). The judgment reads “29.03 Penal 

Code” under “Statute for Offense.” The record, however, shows the jury convicted 

appellant of the lesser-included offense of robbery. We therefore modify the 

judgment to reflect that appellant was convicted of robbery under TEX. PENAL CODE 

ANN. § 29.02. 

Further, the judgment currently states that Caitlin Paver represented the State. 

But the record reflects that Marissa Hatchett prosecuted the trial. We modify the 

judgment to reflect that Marissa Hatchett appeared as the attorney for the State. 

As modified, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 

230651F.U05 

 

/Dennise Garcia/ 

DENNISE GARCIA 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

GONZALO BUSTOS, Appellant 

No. 05-23-00651-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the Criminal District 

Court No. 4, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F22-56768-K. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Garcia. 

Justices Pedersen, III and Smith 

participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

MODIFIED to reflect that appellant was convicted under TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.02 

and Marissa Hatchett appeared as the attorney for the State. 

As REFORMED, the judgment is AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered August 28, 2024
# C_2022277EN.01000601.xml

| 19.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

18 July 2022

(2022/C 277/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0131 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,16 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4435 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84708 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5265 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9911 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2553 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,508 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 402,05 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7760 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9389 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 17,7225 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4839 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3151 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,9528 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6432 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4153 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 333,33 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,3830 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,8266 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5130 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 157,63 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5113 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,056 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,130 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,4505 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7095 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,0340 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0131

JPY

Japanese yen

140,16

DKK

Danish krone

7,4435

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84708

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5265

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9911

ISK

Iceland króna

138,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2553

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,508

HUF

Hungarian forint

402,05

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7760

RON

Romanian leu

4,9389

TRY

Turkish lira

17,7225

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4839

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3151

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,9528

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6432

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4153

KRW

South Korean won

1 333,33

ZAR

South African rand

17,3830

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,8266

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5130

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 157,63

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5113

PHP

Philippine peso

57,056

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,130

BRL

Brazilian real

5,4505

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7095

INR

Indian rupee

81,0340

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2


          AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF LONG TERM DEBT INSTRUMENTS

         In reliance upon Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, Global
Election Systems Inc., a British Columbia Corporation (the "Company") has not
filed as an exhibit to its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2001, any instrument with respect to long term debt where
the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed ten (10)
percent of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis. Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, the
Company hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such agreement to the Securities
and Exchange Commission upon request.



                          Global Election Systems Inc.


                           By: /s/ Robert J. Urosevich
                                   Robert J. Urosevich
                                   President and Chief Operating Officer
# C_2013256EN.01001501.xml

| 5.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/15

---

Information notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority based on Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations on scheduled air services on the helicopter route Værøy–Bodø v.v.

2013/C 256/08

| Member State | Norway |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Værøy–Bodø v.v. |
| Period of validity of the contracts | 1 August 2014-31 July 2019 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 5 November 2013 at 12.00 |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Ministry of Transport and Communications |
| PO Box 8010 Dep |
| 0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |
| Tel. +47 22248353 |
| Fax +47 22245609 |
| http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/sd/Documents/Other-documents/Tenders.html |

Member State

Norway

Concerned routes

Værøy–Bodø v.v.

Period of validity of the contracts

1 August 2014-31 July 2019

Deadline for submission of tenders

5 November 2013 at 12.00

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Ministry of Transport and Communications

PO Box 8010 Dep

0030 Oslo

NORWAY

Tel. +47 22248353

Fax +47 22245609

http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/sd/Documents/Other-documents/Tenders.html

---
#### §§ 367.10-367.11 [Reserved]
§ 313.81 Notice. At least 30 days before the initiation of garnishment proceedings, the Director will send, by first class mail to the debtor's last known address, a written notice informing the debtor of: ( a ) The nature and amount of the debt;
( b ) The FDIC's intention to initiate proceedings to collect the debt through deductions from the debtor's pay until the debt and all accumulated interest penalties and administrative costs are paid in full;
( c ) An explanation of the debtor's rights as set forth in § 313.82(c); and
( d ) The time frame within which the debtor may exercise these rights. The FDIC shall retain a stamped copy of the notice indicating the date the notice was mailed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EDISON CONTROL CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         968,958
<SECURITIES>                                 4,629,762
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,072,913
<ALLOWANCES>                                   372,621
<INVENTORY>                                  5,790,634
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,826,817
<PP&E>                                       7,753,672
<DEPRECIATION>                                 836,002
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,250,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,683,217
<BONDS>                                     14,700,929
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,759
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,667,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,250,496
<SALES>                                     18,126,002
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,126,002
<CGS>                                       11,320,989
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,320,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,106,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                80,353
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             867,738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,831,160
<INCOME-TAX>                                   785,225
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,045,935
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,045,935
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>
#### § 3.501 Remedies.

A national bank or Federal savings association that does not have or maintain the minimum capital ratios applicable to it, whether required in subpart B of this part, in a decision pursuant to subpart H of this part, in a written agreement or temporary or final order under 12 U.S.C. 1818 (b) or (c), or in a condition for approval of an application, or a national bank or Federal savings association that has failed to submit or comply with an acceptable plan to attain those ratios, will be subject to such administrative action or sanctions as the OCC considers appropriate. These sanctions may include the issuance of a Directive pursuant to subpart J of this part or other enforcement action, assessment of civil money penalties, and/or the denial, conditioning, or revocation of applications. A national bank's or Federal savings association's failure to achieve or maintain minimum capital ratios in subpart B of this part may also be the basis for an action by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to terminate Federal deposit insurance. See 12 CFR part 308, subpart F.
#### § 352.4 Nondiscrimination in any program or activity conducted by the FDIC.

In accordance with section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, no qualified individual with a disability shall, solely by reason of his or her disability, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination in any program or activity conducted by the FDIC.
# C_2022103EN.01001301.xml

| 3.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/13

---

No state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

(2022/C 103/10)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 17 November 2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 83768 |
| Decision No | 257/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Alleged aid to Landsbankinn and Íslandsbanki |
| Legal basis | Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement |
| Type of measure | No aid |
| Economic sectors | Financial services |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Icelandic State Financial Investments (ISFI) |

Date of adoption of the decision

17 November 2021

Case No

83768

Decision No

257/21/COL

EFTA State

Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Alleged aid to Landsbankinn and Íslandsbanki

Legal basis

Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

Type of measure

No aid

Economic sectors

Financial services

Name and address of the granting authority

The Icelandic State Financial Investments (ISFI)

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
59–008 

Calendar No. 91 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–260 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY THE BILL (H.R. 1) TO PROVIDE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF 

THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON TERRORIST ATTACKS UPON THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 25, 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 567] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 567, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1) to provide for the implementation of the recommendations of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. The resolution waives all 

points of order against the conference report and its consideration. 

Finally, the resolution considers the conference report as read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against the conference report 

and against its consideration includes a waiver of clause 8 of rule 

XXII (requiring a three-day layover of conference reports and the 

accompanying joint explanatory statement). 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with HEARING
#### § 335.121 Listing standards related to audit committees.

The provisions of the applicable SEC regulation under section 10(A)(m) of the Exchange Act shall be followed as codified at 17 CFR part 240.

[75 FR 73949, Nov. 30, 2010]
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3209

AN ACT

To amend the Reclamation Project Authorization

Act of 1972 to clarify the acreage for which theNorth Loup division is authorized to provide irrigation water under the Missouri River Basinproject.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3209

AN ACT

To amend the Reclamation Project Authorization Act of

1972 to clarify the acreage for which the North Loup

division is authorized to provide irrigation water under

the Missouri River Basin project.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3209 EH

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF ACREAGE FOR IRRIGATION

2 WATER.

3 Section 501 of the Reclamation Project Authorization

4 Act of 1972 (43 U.S.C. 615dddd) is amended by striking

5 ‘‘fifty-three thousand acres’’ and inserting ‘‘approximately

6 53,000 acres’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 17,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2017133EN.01000301.xml

| 27.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/3

---

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Norges Høyesterett dated 14 December 2016 in the case of Torbjørn Selstad Thue and the Norwegian Police Federation (Politiets Fellesforbund) v the Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security

(Case E-19/16)

(2017/C 133/03)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 14 December 2016 from Norges Høyesterett (the Supreme Court of Norway), which was received at the Court Registry on 14 December 2016, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Torbjørn Selstad Thue and the Norwegian Police Federation (Politiets Fellesforbund) v the Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security on the following questions:

| 1. | Is the time spent on a journey ordered by the employer, to and/or from a place of attendance other than the employee’s fixed or habitual place of attendance, when such travel takes place outside normal working hours, to be considered working time within the meaning of Article 2 of Directive 2003/88/EC? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the time spent on a journey ordered by the employer, to and/or from a place of attendance other than the employee’s fixed or habitual place of attendance, when such travel takes place outside normal working hours, to be considered working time within the meaning of Article 2 of Directive 2003/88/EC?

| 2. | Insofar as travel as described in Question I is not by itself sufficient to be classified as working time, what is the legal test and the relevant elements to be considered in the assessment of whether the time spent on travel should nonetheless be deemed to constitute working time? As part of this question, an opinion is requested on whether an intensity assessment should be made of the amount of work performed while travelling. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Insofar as travel as described in Question I is not by itself sufficient to be classified as working time, what is the legal test and the relevant elements to be considered in the assessment of whether the time spent on travel should nonetheless be deemed to constitute working time? As part of this question, an opinion is requested on whether an intensity assessment should be made of the amount of work performed while travelling.

| 3. | Does it have any bearing on the assessments under Questions I and II how often the employer specifies a place of attendance other than the fixed or habitual one? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does it have any bearing on the assessments under Questions I and II how often the employer specifies a place of attendance other than the fixed or habitual one?

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE 

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES 

COMMITTEE

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 538

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2022, the Honorable Frederick J. 

Stollsteimer, Delaware County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Criminal 

Procedural Rules Committee for a term expiring January 1, 2025.
#### McWhorter *v.*The State.

*Violating Prohibition Law.*

(Decided January 13, 1914.

64 South. 158.)

1. *Evidence; Diagram.*— Where a witness gave some description of defendant's store and of a stairway therein, where he testified to finding some liquor, a diagram drawn by him of the place was properly admitted in evidence in connection with his other evidence.

2. *Chai-ge of Court; Directing*Verdict.-Where the evidence is in conflict on a material matter, the court cannot properly direct the verdict.

Appeal from Lowndes Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. A. E. Gamble.

Terrell McWhorter was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and appeals.

Affirmed.

The charge refused to defendant referred to in the opinion is the affirmative charge.

R. L. Goldsmiti-i, for appellant.

Counsel discusses errors insisted on in the admission of evidence, and the-*71refusal to give the affirmative charge for defendant, but without citation of authority.

B. C. BitiGKELti, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

There being no objection as to the correctness of the diagram, it is presumed to be *correct.*— Burton *v. State,*115 Ala. 1; *Jarvis v. State,*138 Ala. 17. In connection with the evidence of the witness, the diagram was admissible.-— *Mann v. State,*131 Ala. *1; A. G. S. -v. Johnson,*128 Ala. 295.

WALKEB, P. J. —

A Avitness for the state, after giving some description of the defendant’s store and of a stairway therein, and testifying as to the finding of some beer and whisky, in response to a request of the solicitor to do so, dreAV a rough sketch or diagram of the store. There was no impropriety in the admission in evidence of this diagram in connection with the testimony of the Avitness in reference to the place in ques*tion.*— Alabama *Great Southern R. Co. v. Johnston,*128 Ala. 283, 29 South. 771; *Jarvis v. State,*138 Ala. 17, 34 South. 1025.

Under the conflicting evidence adduced, the defendant was not entitled to require the court to give the written charge requested in his behalf.

Affirmed.
#### Henry E. Bowns, Appellant, *v.*Samuel Stewart, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment, after a trial before the court without a jury, in favor of the defendant, dismissing the complaint, with costs.

James L. Bishop, for appellant.

John H. Rogan, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The question involved in this case has been passed upon by the Appellate Term. See 28 Misc. Rep. 475.

Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Present: McCarthy and S'chuchman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.