alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014187EN.01000301.xml

| 19.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/3

---

Communication from the EFTA Surveillance Authority under Article 21(7) of the Act referred to at point 1 of Annex VII to the EEA Agreement (Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications)

Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications

2014/C 187/03

Article 21(7) of the Act referred to at point 1 of Annex VII to the EEA Agreement (Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications), foresees that the EEA/EFTA States shall notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority (‘the Authority’) of the legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions they adopt with regard to the issuing of evidence of formal qualifications in the fields covered by Chapter III of the Act. The Authority has the task to publish an appropriate communication indicating the titles adopted by Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway for evidence of formal qualifications and, where appropriate, the body which issues the evidence of formal qualifications, the certificate which accompanies it and the corresponding professional title referred to in Annex V, points 5.1.1, 5.1.4, 5.2.2, 5.3.2, 5.3.3, 5.4.2, 5.5.2, 5.6.2 and 5.7.1 respectively.

(Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications

Since Norway has notified changes in Annex V to Directive 2005/36/EC concerning basic medical training, the Authority publishes the present communication in accordance with Article 21(7) of the Act.

Change of body awarding the evidence of qualifications for basic medical training and change concerning the certificate accompanying the qualifications

Change of body awarding the evidence of qualifications for basic medical training and change concerning the certificate accompanying the qualifications

| Country | Evidence of formal qualifications | Body awarding the evidence of qualifications | Certificate accompanying the qualifications | Reference date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Norge | Vitnemål for fullført grad candidata/candidatus medicinae, short form cand.med. | Universitet | Not applicable | 1 January 1994 |

Country

Evidence of formal qualifications

Body awarding the evidence of qualifications

Certificate accompanying the qualifications

Reference date

Norge

Vitnemål for fullført grad candidata/candidatus medicinae, short form cand.med.

candidata/candidatus medicinae

cand.med.

Universitet

Not applicable

1 January 1994

---
#### § 359.6 Filing instructions.

Requests to make excess nondiscriminatory severance plan payments pursuant to § 359.1(f)(2)(v) and golden parachute payments permitted by § 359.4 shall be submitted in writing to the appropriate regional director (DSC). For filing requirements, consult 12 CFR 303.244. In the event that the consent of the institution's primary federal regulator is required in addition to that of the FDIC, the requesting party shall submit a copy of its letter to the FDIC to the institution's primary federal regulator. In the case of national banks, such written requests shall be submitted to the OCC. In the case of state member banks and bank holding companies, such written requests shall be submitted to the Federal Reserve district bank where the institution or holding company, respectively, is located. In the case of savings associations and savings association holding companies, such written requests shall be submitted to the OTS regional office where the institution or holding company, respectively, is located. In cases where only the prior consent of the institution's primary federal regulator is required and that agency is not the FDIC, a written request satisfying the requirements of this section shall be submitted to the primary federal regulator as described in this section.

[63 FR 44751, Aug. 20, 1998]
# C_2021396EN.01000701.xml

| 30.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 396/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 396/7

---

EFTA Surveillance Authority communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 396/07)

| Member State | Norway |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | — | Routes between Kirkenes, Vadsø, Vardø, Båtsfjord, Berlevåg, Mehamn, Honningsvåg, Hammerfest and Alta |

Member State

Norway

Concerned routes

—

Routes between Kirkenes, Vadsø, Vardø, Båtsfjord, Berlevåg, Mehamn, Honningsvåg, Hammerfest and Alta

| — | Hasvik – Tromsø v.v., Hasvik – Hammerfest v.v., Sørkjosen – Tromsø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Hasvik – Tromsø v.v., Hasvik – Hammerfest v.v., Sørkjosen – Tromsø v.v.

| — | Lakselv – Tromsø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Lakselv – Tromsø v.v.

| — | Andenes – Bodø v.v., Andenes – Tromsø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Andenes – Bodø v.v., Andenes – Tromsø v.v.

| — | Harstad/Narvik – Tromsø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Harstad/Narvik – Tromsø v.v.

| — | Harstad/Narvik – Bodø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Harstad/Narvik – Bodø v.v.

| — | Stokmarknes – Tromsø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Stokmarknes – Tromsø v.v.

| — | Stokmarknes – Bodø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Stokmarknes – Bodø v.v.

| — | Leknes – Bodø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Leknes – Bodø v.v.

| — | Svolvær – Bodø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Svolvær – Bodø v.v.

| — | Røst – Bodø v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Røst – Bodø v.v.

| — | Brønnøysund – Bodø v.v., Brønnøysund – Trondheim v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Brønnøysund – Bodø v.v., Brønnøysund – Trondheim v.v.

| — | Sandnessjøen – Bodø v.v., Sandnessjøen – Trondheim v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Sandnessjøen – Bodø v.v., Sandnessjøen – Trondheim v.v.

| — | Mo i Rana – Bodø v.v., Mo i Rana – Trondheim v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mo i Rana – Bodø v.v., Mo i Rana – Trondheim v.v.

| — | Mosjøen – Bodø v.v., Mosjøen – Trondheim v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mosjøen – Bodø v.v., Mosjøen – Trondheim v.v.

| — | Namsos – Trondheim v.v., Rørvik – Trondheim v.v. |
| --- | --- |

—

Namsos – Trondheim v.v., Rørvik – Trondheim v.v.

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1.4.2022

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligations can be obtained

The Norwegian Ministry of Transport

Find document - regjeringen.no

---
#### § 363.0 OMB control number.

The information collection requirements in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB control number 3064-0113.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00505-CV

Knot Anymore, LLC, Appellant

v.

Cyn Rod, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 

NO. C-1-CV-18-011897, THE HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant Knot Anymore, LLC has filed an unopposed motion to abate this 

appeal for a 45-day period beginning on October 29 to allow the parties to finalize a settlement

agreement. We grant the motion and abate the appeal. The parties shall submit either a joint 

status report concerning the status of settlement negotiations or a motion to dismiss on or before 

December 13, 2019. The appeal will remain abated until further order of this Court.

It is so ordered on November 7, 2019.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Triana and Smith

Abated 

Filed: November 7, 2019
Order filed December 12, 2019

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-19-00316-CR

__________

IN RE CHRISTOPHER COBOS

Original Proceeding

O R D E R

We have reviewed the “Motion to Disqualify or Recuse and Reverse 

Judgments” filed in this cause on December 5, 2019, as it pertains to seeking the 

recusal of Justice Keith Stretcher. Pursuant to Rule 16.3(b) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure, Justice Stretcher has considered the motion in chambers. 

Justice Stretcher has found no reason to recuse himself and, pursuant to Rule 16.3(b), 

has certified the issue to the entire court for a determination by the other justices of 

this court.1

 See TEX. R. APP. P. 16.3(b). Chief Justice John M. Bailey and Senior 

Chief Justice Jim R. Wright have decided the matter without Justice Stretcher’s 

participation.

 1

A copy of Justice Stretcher’s written certification is attached to this order.
2

The recusal of appellate judges is controlled by Rule 16 of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. The grounds for recusal of an appellate court justice are 

provided in the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. TEX. R. APP. P. 16.2; see TEX. R.

CIV. P. 18b. We find no reason for Justice Stretcher to recuse himself and hold that 

none of the grounds set out in Rule 18b are applicable to Justice Stretcher in this 

case. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 18b; see also Manges v. Guerra, 673 S.W.2d 180, 185 

(Tex. 1984); McCullough v. Kitzman, 50 S.W.3d 87, 88 (Tex. App.—Waco 2001, 

pet. denied).

The request for the recusal of Justice Keith Stretcher is denied.

PER CURIAM

December 12, 2019

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., 

and Wright, S.C.J.2

Stretcher, J., and Willson, J., not participating.

 2

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2008257EN.01001801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 25.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 257/18 |

---

EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY DECISION

No 300/08/COL

of 21 May 2008

approving the contingency plan on Avian Influenza submitted by Norway

THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY,

HAVING REGARD to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement), in particular Article 109 and Protocol 1 thereof,

HAVING REGARD to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice, in particular Article 5(2)(d) and Protocol 1 thereof,

HAVING REGARD to the Act referred to at Point 3.1.5a of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement,

Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC,

WHEREAS, in accordance with Article 62(1) of Council Directive 2005/94/EC, Norway has drawn up a contingency plan specifying the national measures to be implemented in the event of an outbreak of Avian Influenza,

WHEREAS, on 29 October 2007, and in accordance with Article 62(1) of Council Directive 2005/94/EC, Norway submitted to the EFTA Surveillance Authority (hereinafter referred to as the Authority) its contingency plan on Avian Influenza for approval (event No 449330),

WHEREAS an English translation of the Norwegian contingency plan on Avian Influenza was submitted to the Authority on 31 March 2008 (event No 471610),

WHEREAS the Authority, in close co-operation with the Commission of the European Communities, has examined the Norwegian contingency plan on Avian Influenza,

WHEREAS the examination shows that the plan submitted by Norway fulfils the minimum requirements for national contingency plans on Avian Influenza laid down in Annex X to Council Directive 2005/94/EC and therefore is to be approved,

WHEREAS the Authority by its Decision 270/08/COL referred the matters to the EFTA Veterinary Committee assisting the Authority,

WHEREAS the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the EFTA Veterinary Committee assisting the Authority,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | The contingency plan on Avian Influenza submitted by Norway is hereby approved. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | This Decision shall enter into force on 21 May 2008. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | This Decision is addressed to Norway. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | This Decision shall be authentic in the English language. |

Done at Brussels, 21 May 2008.

For the EFTA Surveillance Authority

Per SANDERUD

President

Kristján Andri STEFÁNSSON

College Member

---
#### CITY OF ELDORADO SPRINGS, MISSOURI, Respondent v. F. J. HIGHFILL, Appellant.

Springfield Court of Appeals,

January 6, 1913.

JURISDICTION: Supreme Court. A case involving a Federal question, to-wit, a construction of the Constitution of the United States regulating commerce between States, is within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, and not the Court of Appeals.

Appeal from Cedar County Circuit *Court.*— lion. *B. G. Thurman,*Judge.

Transferred to the supreme court.

*Chas. E. Gilbert*and *J. F. Rhodes*for appellant.

*R. N. Banister*for respondent.

PEE CURIAM.

This case involves a Federal question, to-wit, a construction of section 8 of article 1 of the Constitution of the United States regulating commerce between States. A similar case was transferred by the St. Louis Court- of Appeals and retained by the Supreme Court. [State v. Looney, 116 Mo. App. 592, 96 S. W. 316; *Id.,*214 Mo. 216, 97 S. W. 934, 99 S. W. 1165.]

Ordered transferred to the Supreme. Court for decision.
EXHIBIT  10.19

     ______________,  2000



George  Watts



     Re:  Liquidity  Agreement/Right  to  Put  Certain Shares of Executive Stock

Dear  George:

     Reference  is hereby made to that certain Second Executive Stock Agreement,
dated  as of _____________, 2000 (the "Stock Agreement"), among Ranger Aerospace
                                       ---------------
Corporation  (the "Company") and you.  Each capitalized term used herein without
                   -------
definition  shall  have  the  meaning  given  such  term in the Stock Agreement.

     In  order  to  allow  you  to  pay any Additional Tax Liability in a timely
manner,  to  the  extent you incur an Additional Tax Liability while employed by
the  Company,  you  will  have  the right to require the Company to purchase the
number of shares of Executive Stock (or fraction thereof) with an aggregate Fair
Market  Value  equal  to  the  Additional  Tax  Liability.  For purposes of this
agreement,  "Additional  Tax  Liability"  shall  mean in any tax year in which a
final  tax  adjustment  is  made by the Internal Revenue Service with respect to
your  purchase  of  Executive  Stock  under  the Stock Agreement, all additional
taxes,  interest and penalties applicable to any such final tax adjustment.  The
undersigned's obligation to purchase such shares of Executive Stock hereunder is
conditioned  upon  your  providing  the  undersigned  with documentation that is
reasonably  satisfactory  to  the Company  evidencing the final determination of
such  Additional  Tax  Liability.
It  is  the intent of this agreement to provide you with liquidity for a portion
of  your Executive Stock so as allow you to pay on a timely basis any Additional
Tax  Liability.  This  agreement  shall at all times be interpreted consistently
with  such  intent.

     Very  truly  yours,

     RANGER  AEROSPACE  CORPORATION

     __________________________________
By:
Its:
Agreed  and  acknowledged  as  of
date  first  written  above:

_______________________
George  Watts




<PAGE>
§ 380.10 Maximum obligation limitation. ( a ) *General rule.* The FDIC shall not, in connection with the orderly liquidation of a covered financial company, issue or incur any obligation, if, after issuing or incurring the obligation, the aggregate amount of such obligations outstanding for each covered financial company would exceed— ( 1 ) An amount that is equal to 10 percent of the total consolidated assets of the covered financial company, based on the most recent financial statement available, during the 30-day period immediately following the date of appointment of the FDIC as receiver (or a shorter time period if the FDIC has calculated the amount described under paragraph (a)(2) of this section); and
( 2 ) The amount that is equal to 90 percent of the fair value of the total consolidated assets of each covered financial company that are available for repayment, after the time period described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) *Definitions:* For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) The term “fair value” means the expected total aggregate value of each asset, or group of assets that are managed within a portfolio, of a covered financial company on a consolidated basis if such asset, or group of assets, was sold or otherwise disposed of in an orderly transaction.
( 2 ) The term “most recent financial statement available” means a covered financial company's: ( i ) Most recent financial statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or any other regulatory body;
( ii ) Most recent financial statement audited by an independent CPA firm; or
( iii ) Other available financial statements. The FDIC and the Treasury will jointly determine the most pertinent of the above financial statements, taking into consideration the timeliness and reliability of the statements being considered.
( 3 ) The term “obligation” means, with respect to any covered financial company: ( i ) Any guarantee issued by the FDIC on behalf of the covered financial company;
( ii ) Any amount borrowed pursuant to section 210(n)(5)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Act; and
( iii ) Any other obligation with respect to the covered financial company for which the FDIC has a direct or contingent liability to pay any amount.
( 4 ) The term “total consolidated assets of each covered financial company that are available for repayment” means the difference between: ( i ) The total assets of the covered financial company on a consolidated basis that are available for liquidation during the operation of the receivership; and
( ii ) To the extent included in (b)(4)(i) of this section, all assets that are separated from, or made unavailable to, the covered financial company by a statutory or regulatory barrier that prevents the covered financial company from possessing or selling assets and using the proceeds from the sale of such assets.
[77 FR 37557, June 22, 2012]
EPA # 3683(h)EPA # 3683(h)
# C_2018449EN.01003501.xml

| 13.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 449/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 449/35

---

EFTA Surveillance Authority notice on state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 December 2018

(Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (1)
  )

(2018/C 449/08)

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines as amended by the Authority’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To obtain the applicable reference rates, appropriate margins shall be added to the base rate in accordance with the State Aid Guidelines.

Base rates have been determined as follows:

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.7.2017 – 31.8.2017 | 6,18 | -0,50 | 1,08 |
| 1.9.2017 – 30.11.2017 | 5,20 | -0,50 | 1,08 |
| 1.12.2017 – 31.12.2017 | 5,20 | -0,50 | 0,89 |
| 1.1.2018 – 30.4.2018 | 4,84 | -0,52 | 0,88 |
| 1.5.2018 – 30.11.2018 | 4,84 | -0,52 | 1,04 |
| 1.12.2018 – 31.12.2018 | 4,84 | -0,52 | 1,20 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.7.2017 – 31.8.2017

6,18

-0,50

1,08

1.9.2017 – 30.11.2017

5,20

-0,50

1,08

1.12.2017 – 31.12.2017

5,20

-0,50

0,89

1.1.2018 – 30.4.2018

4,84

-0,52

0,88

1.5.2018 – 30.11.2018

4,84

-0,52

1,04

1.12.2018 – 31.12.2018

4,84

-0,52

1,20

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and EEA Supplement No 26, 25.5.2006, p. 1.

---
#### EDWARD A. NOLL v. UNITED STATES

[61 C. Cls. 180; 270 U. S. 649]

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court March 15, 1926.
#### § 303.60 Scope.

This subpart sets forth the application requirements and procedures for transactions subject to FDIC approval under the Bank Merger Act, section 18(c) of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1828(c)). Additional guidance is contained in the FDIC “Statement of Policy on Bank Merger Transactions” (1 FDIC Law, Regulations, Related Acts 5145; see § 309.4(a) and (b) of this chapter for availability).
§ 1.1 Authority, purpose, scope, and reservation of authority. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.,* 12 U.S.C. 24 (Seventh), and 12 U.S.C. 93a.
( b ) *Purpose* This part prescribes standards under which national banks may purchase, sell, deal in, underwrite, and hold securities, consistent with the authority contained in 12 U.S.C. 24 (Seventh) and safe and sound banking practices.
( c ) *Scope.* The standards set forth in this part apply to national banks and Federal branches of foreign banks. Further, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 335, State banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System are subject to the same limitations and conditions that apply to national banks in connection with purchasing, selling, dealing in, and underwriting securities and stock. In addition to activities authorized under this part, foreign branches of national banks are authorized to conduct international activities and invest in securities pursuant to 12 CFR part 211.
( d ) *Reservation of authority.* The OCC may determine, on a case-by-case basis, that a national bank may acquire an investment security other than an investment security of a type set forth in this part, provided the OCC determines that the bank's investment is consistent with 12 U.S.C. section 24 (Seventh) and with safe and sound banking practices. The OCC will consider all relevant factors, including the risk characteristics of the particular investment in comparison with the risk characteristics of investments that the OCC has previously authorized, and the bank's ability effectively to manage such risks. The OCC may impose limits or conditions in connection with approval of an investment security under this subsection. Investment securities that the OCC determines are permissible in accordance with this paragraph constitute eligible investments for purposes of 12 U.S.C. 24.
[61 FR 63982, Dec. 2, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 22235, Apr. 24, 2008]