alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020381EN.01002901.xml

| 12.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/29

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2020/C 381/11)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 31 July 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85346 |
| Decision No | 099/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 Compensation to TORP Sandefjord Airport |
| Legal basis | The contract between the Ministry of Transport and Sandefjord Lufthavn AS, which implements the objective of the Norwegian Parliament of securing continued operations of Norwegian airports. |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | To compensate part of the damage directly caused to Sandefjord Lufthavn AS from 1 March 2020 to 30 September 2020 due to the public containment measures taken as a consequence of the COVID-19 outbreak. |
| Form of aid | Grant |
| Budget | NOK 90 million |
| Intensity | 66,9 % |
| Economic sectors | Aviation |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Ministry of Transport |
| Postboks 8010 Dep |
| 0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

31 July 2020

Case No

85346

Decision No

099/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 Compensation to TORP Sandefjord Airport

Legal basis

The contract between the Ministry of Transport and Sandefjord Lufthavn AS, which implements the objective of the Norwegian Parliament of securing continued operations of Norwegian airports.

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

To compensate part of the damage directly caused to Sandefjord Lufthavn AS from 1 March 2020 to 30 September 2020 due to the public containment measures taken as a consequence of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Form of aid

Grant

Budget

NOK 90 million

Intensity

66,9 %

Economic sectors

Aviation

Name and address of the granting authority

The Ministry of Transport

Postboks 8010 Dep

0030 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
#### § 330.16 [Reserved]
<PAGE>   1


                                SUMMA FOUR, INC.

                                   EXHIBIT 21
                                  SUBSIDIARIES



The following is a list of the Company's subsidiaries at March 31, 1998:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                Percentage of Voting
                                           Organized              Securities Owned
Name                                     Under Laws of          By Summa Four, Inc.
----                                     -------------          --------------------
<S>                                      <C>                          <C> 

Summa Four Limited                       United Kingdom                 100%

Summa Four International                 Barbados                       100%

Summa Four Pte., Limited                 Singapore                      100%

Summa Four, Japan, Inc.                  Delaware                       100%

Summa Four Japan, KK                     Japan                          100%

Summation, L.L.C.                        Delaware                        75%

</TABLE>


                                       49
September 9, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JAMES DAUBREY JONES, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00675-CR

NO. 14-14-00676-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eldorado Artesian Springs,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period  ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Cathleen Shoenfeld, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 USC SS. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to SS. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Cathleen Shoenfeld
----------------------
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 18, 2005
```
#### HUBBARD V. THE STATE.

(Decided May 22, 1913.)

Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. C. P. Almon.

No counsel marked for appellant. B. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 308.140 Newspaper notice. ( a ) *General rule.* If the Board of Directors or its designee, in its sole discretion, decides to further consider an application for exemption, there shall be served upon the applicant instructions to publish one notification in a newspaper of general circulation in the community where the main office of the issuer is located. The applicant shall furnish proof of such publication to the Administrative Officer or such other person as may be directed in the instructions.
( b ) *Contents.* The notification shall contain the name and address of the issuer and the name and title of the applicant, the exemption sought, a statement that a hearing will be held, and a statement that within 30 days of publication of the newspaper notice, interested persons may submit to the FDIC written comments on the application for exemption and a written request for an opportunity to be heard. The address of the FDIC must appear in the notice.
[56 FR 37975, Aug. 9, 1991, as amended at 86 FR 2249, Jan. 12, 2021]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 297

To require any amounts remaining in a Member’s Representational Allowance 

at the end of a fiscal year to be deposited in the Treasury and used 

for deficit reduction or to reduce the Federal debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2003

Mr. KIND (for himself and Mr. KIRK) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL

To require any amounts remaining in a Member’s Representational Allowance at the end of a fiscal year to be 

deposited in the Treasury and used for deficit reduction 

or to reduce the Federal debt.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REQUIRING AMOUNTS REMAINING IN MEM4 BERS’ REPRESENTATIONAL ALLOWANCES TO 

5 BE USED FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION OR TO RE6 DUCE THE FEDERAL DEBT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, any amounts appropriated for Members’ Rep-
2

•HR 297 IH 

1 resentational Allowances for the House of Representatives 

2 for a fiscal year which remain after all payments are made 

3 under such Allowances for the year shall be deposited in 

4 the Treasury and used for deficit reduction, except that 

5 in the case of a fiscal year for which there is no Federal 

6 budget deficit, such amounts shall be used to reduce the 

7 Federal debt (in such manner as the Secretary of the 

8 Treasury considers appropriate). 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply with 

10 respect to fiscal year 2003 and each succeeding fiscal year.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.2

                                [HPL LETTERHEAD]

April 3, 2000

Mrs. Ita Geva

Dear Ita,

This letter is to formalize our offer of employment to you at Heuristic Physics
Laboratories, Inc. HPL is a rapidly growing company and offers good
opportunities for professional growth to persons with good background,
creativity and motivation. I trust that you will bring a significant
contribution to HPL and that you and the company will benefit from this new
association.

Our offer is as follows:
Position            :   Chief Financial Officer.
Salary              :   $100,000  per year paid bi-weekly.
Bonus               :   20% of the basic salary, Based on Annual performance
                        and objectives to be developed every year.
Start date          :   April 3, 2000


In this position, you are entitled to the following benefits; please see
in-closed information for further clarification:

1.       Health Insurance             -   covered by LIFEGUARD
2.       Dental Insurance             -   covered by DELTA
3.       401k Plan                    -   Next enrollment date is June
4.       Paid Company Vacation        -   10 working days
5.       Nine Paid Holidays

I will also suggest to Board of Directors to grant you with 200,000 HPL stock as
part of HPL Stock option plan. This will be vested over 4 years (see
attachment).

The following documentation must be presented before becoming employed.
a)   Copy of Social Security Card
b)   Proof of permanent residency in the U.S. or if you are a U.S. citizen, you
     must present a document to prove legal immigration status
c)   Copy of Driver's License
d)

Sincerely yours,

HEURISTIC PHYSICS LABORATORIES, INC.             I agree and accept this offer.


Rita Rubinstein
VP of Human Resources & Administration           Ita Geva

/s/ RITA RUBINSTEIN                              /s/ ITA GEVA

<PAGE>


ATTACHMENT TO OFFER LETTER

ADJUSTMENT UPON CHANGE OF CONTROL

With regards the recommendation that the Board grants you options to purchase
200,000 shares and the proposed 4 years vesting schedule: If (a) all of HPL's
assets are sold or (b) HPL merges or consolidates with another company and is
not the surviving and controlling corporation, 60% of the unvested shares
subject to the grant shall be deemed vested, even if some or all of them had
already vested, in accordance with the vesting schedule of the company's stock
option plan.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3168 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3168

 To amend title 40, United States Code, to direct the Administrator of 
   General Services to give preference to high unemployment areas in 
selecting sites for the construction of public buildings and in leasing 
                 space to accommodate Federal agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 2003

Mr. Goode (for himself and Mr. Boucher) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 40, United States Code, to direct the Administrator of 
   General Services to give preference to high unemployment areas in 
selecting sites for the construction of public buildings and in leasing 
                 space to accommodate Federal agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``High Unemployment Area Assistance 
Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the 
        Department of Labor, 3,127,000 net private sector jobs have 
        been lost since January 2001;
            (2) the national unemployment rate was 6.2 percent in July 
        2003;
            (3) certain industries and geographical areas have borne a 
        disproportionate share of the job loss and unemployment;
            (4) according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2,406,000 
        net manufacturing sector jobs have been lost since January 
        2001; and
            (5) unemployment in many manufacturing intensive areas 
        exceeded 10 percent in July 2003.

SEC. 3. PREFERENCE FOR LOCATING PUBLIC BUILDINGS IN HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT 
              AREAS.

    Section 3306 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(d) Preference for High Unemployment Areas.--In selecting sites 
for the construction of public buildings and in leasing space to 
accommodate Federal agencies, the Administrator shall give preference 
to areas in which, for the most recent 12-month period for which data 
is available, the unemployment rate exceeds the national average by 2 
percentage points or more, as calculated by the Bureau of Labor 
Statistics of the Department of Labor.''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.50



 Exhibit 10.50 

Summary of MeadWestvaco Corporation 2015 Annual Incentive Plan 

Under the MeadWestvaco Corporation Annual Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which is a part of the 2005 Performance Incentive Plan, Amended and Restated
effective February 25, 2013, the Compensation and Organization Development Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors annually approves an annual incentive award for each executive that is payable in cash, subject to
achievement of pre-established performance goals. The size of each executive officer’s annual award is determined by application of his or her annual incentive target (expressed as a percentage of base salary) multiplied by performance factors
based on achievement of goals. The Committee examines incentive targets annually to confirm that the target is reasonable when viewed against external competitive market data, peer group and general industry trends. 

For 2015, the Committee established a performance-based incentive pool for certain executive officers equal to a designated percentage of actual earnings
before interest and tax (“EBIT”) achieved. EBIT is defined as full year net sales less the cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding interest income and expense, corporate income taxes, extraordinary
items, discontinued operations, restructuring charges and certain one-time costs and the cumulative effect of accounting changes. 
 Funding of the
performance-based incentive pool under this formula permits the Committee to pay annual cash incentives to all executive officers based on the attainment of additional key financial and/or operational metrics. These additional objectives for
executive officers are also set by the Committee. Given the pending business combination with the Rock-Tenn Company (“Transaction”), the Committee established 2015 performance goals based on a 6-month and 12-month performance period.
Payouts under the 2015 Annual Incentive Plan would be pro-rated based on the closing date of the Transaction and the achievement of performance goals, as determined by the Committee. The 6-month performance period includes the goals of (i) EBIT
and (ii) revenue. The 12-month performance period includes the goals of (i) enterprise economic profit (“EP”), defined as after-tax EBIT, less the company’s weighted average cost of capital applied to total capital employed,
(net debt plus total shareholder equity) subject to certain adjustments, (ii) revenue and (iii) operating margin. For each of these performance objectives, the Committee sets performance driven threshold, target and stretch payout levels
reflecting a payout curve ranging from 50% of the target incentive to 200% of the target incentive. Annual incentives are subject to an individual maximum payout in accordance with the terms of the Plan. The Committee may adjust award values to
reflect progress made towards target performance levels for EP, revenue growth and operating margin goals, provided no awards are payable in the event the threshold for EBIT (which funds the incentive pool) is not achieved. Annual incentive awards
are subject to the company’s Recoupment Policy.
# C_2007111EN.01002301.xml

| 17.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/23

---

Notification from the Norwegian authorities concerning a loan granted by the County Municipality of Møre and Romsdal to a private seed capital and equity fund to be established for the purpose of providing risk capital to small and medium-sized enterprises in the county of Møre and Romsdal

(2007/C 111/11)

EFTA Surveillance Authority has decided not to raise objections against the notified measure

Date of adoption:

EFTA State: Norway

Case No: 60219

Title: Møre and Romsdal Private Seed Capital and Equity Fund

Objective: Risk Capital

Legal basis: Article 61(3)(c) EEA and Chapter 10B of the EFTA Surveillance Authority's State Aid Guidelines

Duration: 15 years

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
# C_2009241EN.01001701.xml

| 8.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/17

---

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

EFTA Surveillance Authority decision not to raise objections

2009/C 241/08

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 31.3.2009 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 65827 |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Region | : | Nordland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Route Development Fund Bodø |
| Legal basis | : | Article 61(3)(c) EEA |
| Type of measure | : | Aid scheme |
| Objective | : | Creation of new international air routes to Bodø |
| Form of aid | : | (i) | Route-specific marketing support |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

31.3.2009

Case number

:

65827

EFTA State

:

Norway

Region

:

Nordland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Route Development Fund Bodø

Legal basis

:

Article 61(3)(c) EEA

Type of measure

:

Aid scheme

Objective

:

Creation of new international air routes to Bodø

Form of aid

:

(i)

Route-specific marketing support

| (ii) | Development project aid |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

Development project aid

| (iii) | Discount support for airport charges |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

Discount support for airport charges

Budget

:

NOK 12 million (approximately EUR 1,2 million)

Intensity costs

:

Aid cannot exceed 50 % of total eligible for a given year and total aid may not may not exceed an average of 40 % of eligible costs

Duration

:

Five years

Economic sectors

:

Passenger air transport

Name and address of the granting authority

:

| Bodø Municipality |
| --- |
| Postbox 319 |
| 8001 Bodø |
| NORWAY |

Bodø Municipality

Postbox 319

8001 Bodø

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
EXHIBIT 23.1




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm




The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Copart, Inc.




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-81238) pertaining to the Copart 1992 Stock Option Plan, 1994 Director Option Plan, and 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
(Form S-8 No. 33-97636) pertaining to the Copart 1992 Stock Option Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-93887) pertaining to the Copart 1992 Stock Option Plan and
the Copart 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-90612) pertaining to the Copart 2001 Stock Option Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-112597)
pertaining to the Copart 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-148506) pertaining to the Copart 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, and (Form
S-8 No. 333-159946) pertaining to the Copart, Inc. Stand Alone Stock Option Award Agreement dated April 14, 2009 between Copart, Inc. and Willis J.
Johnson and the Copart, Inc. Stand Alone Stock Option Award Agreement dated April 14, 2009 between Copart, Inc. and A. Jayson Adair of our reports
dated September 27, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Copart, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Copart, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended July 31, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.




/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




San Francisco, California September 27, 2011


---
Editorial Note on Subpart F of Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart F appear at 89 FR 7165, Feb. 1, 2024.

§ 25.61 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this subpart is to implement section 109 (12 U.S.C. 1835a) of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (Interstate Act).
( b ) *Scope.* ( 1 ) This subpart applies to any national bank or savings association that has operated a covered interstate branch for a period of at least one year, and any foreign bank or savings association that has operated a covered interstate branch that is a Federal branch for a period of at least one year.
( 2 ) This subpart describes the requirements imposed under 12 U.S.C. 1835a, which requires the appropriate Federal banking agencies (the OCC, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the FDIC) to prescribe uniform rules that prohibit a bank or savings association from using any authority to engage in interstate branching pursuant to the Interstate Act, or any amendment made by the Interstate Act to any other provision of law, primarily for the purpose of deposit production.