alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022484EN.01004201.xml

| 20.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 484/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 484/42

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2022/C 484/24)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Lithuania

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Lithuania

Subject of commemoration: 100 years of basketball in Lithuania

Description of the design: The design shows the contour of the map of Lithuania arranged as a basketball court in the centre, which signifies that basketball has been played in Lithuania already for 100 years. The coin also features the inscriptions ‘LIETUVA’ (Lithuania), ‘1922-2022’ and the logo of the Lithuanian mint, its manufacturer, arranged in a semi-circle around the centre.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 750 000

Date of issue: Second quarter 2022

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
§ 303.200 Scope. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) This subpart covers applications filed pursuant to section 38 of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1831 *o*), which requires insured depository institutions that are not adequately capitalized to receive approval prior to engaging in certain activities. Section 38 restricts or prohibits certain activities and requires an insured depository institution to submit a capital restoration plan when it becomes undercapitalized. The restrictions and prohibitions become more severe as an institution's capital level declines.
( 2 ) Definitions of the capital categories referenced in this Prompt Corrective Action subpart may be found in subpart H of part 324 of this chapter.
( b ) *Institutions covered.* Restrictions and prohibitions contained in subpart H of part 324 of this chapter apply primarily to FDIC-supervised institutions, as well as to directors and senior executive officers of those institutions. Portions of subpart H of part 324 of this chapter also apply to all insured depository institutions that are deemed to be critically undercapitalized.
[67 FR 79247, Dec. 27, 2002, as amended at 78 FR 55470, Sept. 10, 2013; 83 FR 17739, Apr. 24, 2018; 85 FR 3245, Jan. 21, 2020]
42502.

#### MOOG v. PALMOUR.

Frankum, Presiding Judge.

Where a contract for the sale of a described tract of realty provides that the fixed and definite purchase price of $704,500, as set forth therein, is to be paid as follows: Purchaser to buy subject to an existing first mortgage (which is fully described); that “This loan balance after January 1966 payment estimated at $555,000; seller to accept purchaser’s equity in property known as 2998 Grandview Ave., N.E. in the amount of $23,500; purchaser to pay cash in the amount of $22,000; seller to accept purchase money note and security deed on above property in the amount of $104,000,” with interest rate, term and monthly payments on such note fully described, such contract was too vague, indefinite and uncertain to be enforced. No closing date of the sale contemplated by the contract was definitely provided for therein, *603and it will, therefore, be presumed that the parties contemplated that the contract would be consummated within a reasonable time after the offer to buy made by the purchaser was accepted by the seller. However, under the clear and unmistakable terms of the contract, should the closing date in fact turn out to be some date other than January, 1966, the estimated balance of the loan to be assumed by the buyer would necessarily vary from the figure of $555,000, set forth in the contract. But the contract does not state whether the fixed and definite figure of $22,000 cash to be paid by the buyer or the fixed and definite figure of the $104,000 purchase money note to be given by the buyer shall be varied to arrive at the fixed and definite figure of $704,500 as the total purchase price. For example, if, upon closing the sale, it should be found by the parties that the loan balance, instead of being $555,000, is in fact only $545,000, the question arises: Is the buyer to pay $32,000 in cash and give a note for $104,000, or would the seller be required by the terms of the contract to accept only $22,000 in cash and accept a note for $114,000, so as to make the fixed and definite purchase price of $704,500? The contract furnishes no key by which a court, in construing its terms, can say that either one or the other of these alternatives is required. It is, therefore, too vague and indefinite to be enforceable. *Crawford v. Williford,*145 Ga. 550 (89 SE 488); *C. V. Nalley, Inc. v. Schoen,*215 Ga. 513 (111 SE2d 40); *Stanaland v. Stephens,*78 Ga. App. 68 (2) (50 SE2d 258); *Cole v. Cutler,*96 Ga. App. 891 (102 SE2d 82); *Fleming v. Doran,*98 Ga. App. 837 (107 SE2d 332); *Dunford v. Townsend,*100 Ga. App. 550 (112 SE2d 14).

*Deen and Quillian, JJ., concur.*

Argued January 9, 1967 —

Decided April 4, 1967

Rehearing denied April 19, 1967 —

*Hatcher, Meyerson, Oxford & Irvin, Stanley P. Meyerson,*for appellant.

*Grant, Spears & Duckworth, William H. Duckworth, Jr.,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*
H. R. 3209

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To amend the Reclamation Project Authorization Act of 1972 to clarify the acreage

for which the North Loup division is authorized to provide irrigation water under

the Missouri River Basin project.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF ACREAGE FOR IRRIGATION WATER.

Section 501 of the Reclamation Project Authorization Act of

1972 (43 U.S.C. 615dddd) is amended by striking ‘‘fifty-three thousand acres’’ and inserting ‘‘approximately 53,000 acres’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Skip Links

USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Digital Data Series 069–H

Pubs Warehouse

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF); the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader or similar software is required to view it. Download the latest version of Acrobat Reader, free of charge or go to access.adobe.com for free tools that allow visually impaired users to read PDF files. This report meets accessibility standards defined by Section 508

| /www.usgs.gov/laws/accessibility.html"" class="footer" title="Accessibility Policy (Section 508)">AccessibilityFOIA/www.usgs.gov/laws/privacy.html"" class="footer"title="Privacy Policy and Disclaimers">Privacy/www.usgs.gov/laws/policies_notices.html"" class="footer" title="Policies and Important Notices of the USGS">Policies and Notices |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: <http://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/dds/dds-069/dds-069-h/>Contact: Energy Program InquiriesQuestions or Assistance: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Mon Jul 22 12:03 EDT 2024                                                                                          | /www.usa.gov/"" title="USAGov: Government Made Easy">  |

----
**Exhibit 13.2** 
 
**SECTION 906 - Certification of Chief Financial Officer
I, Nicolas Burr G., the Chief Financial Officer of Madeco S.A. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 

1.	the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. 	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: June 30, 2009

/s/ Nicolas Burr G.Nicolas Burr G.Chief Financial Officer**
Johnson, Ray (FAA) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Hello Ray, 

Adam Tjelmeland <Adam@parkerbennecorp.com> 

Monday, March 09, 2015 2:36 PM 

Johnson, Ray (FAA) 

Exemption 

Thank you for the call today regarding the exemption for Alaska Air Fuel, Inc. 

My client is pursuing an FAA Part 125 certificate for their aircraft and do not wish to continue with the filed 

exemption at this time. 

Thank you for your help in this matter. 

Best Regards, 

Adam Tjelmeland 

Parker Bennecorp, LLC. 

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTL:: smarlphone 

1
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2841 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2841

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the waiver 
authority relating to the implementation of machine readable passports 
 and to expand the definition of terrorist activities for purposes of 
                              deportation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2003

Mr. Weldon of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the waiver 
authority relating to the implementation of machine readable passports 
 and to expand the definition of terrorist activities for purposes of 
                              deportation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Terrorist Deportation Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATING WAIVER AUTHORITY RELATING TO IMPLEMENTATION OF 
              MACHINE READABLE PASSPORTS.

    Section 217(a)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1187(a)(3)), as amended by Public Law 107-56) is amended by striking 
subparagraph (B).

SEC. 3. EXPANSION OF TERRORIST ACTIVITIES FOR PURPOSES OF DEPORTATION.

    (a) Amendment to INA.--Section 237(a)(4)(B) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(4)(B)) is amended by striking ``as 
defined in section 212(a)(3)(B)(iii))'' and inserting ``as described 
under section 212(a)(3)(B))''.
    (b) Retroactive Application of Amendment.--The amendments made by 
this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act 
and shall apply to--
            (1) all actions taken by an alien before, on, or after such 
        date; and
            (2) all aliens, without regard to the date of entry or 
        attempted entry into the United States in removal proceedings 
        on or after such date (except for proceedings in which there 
        has been a final administrative decision before such date).
                                 <all>
```
# Den Europæiske Unions C 363I/9. s

| | ISSN 1977-0871 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 363I |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 64. årgang9. september 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0871

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 363I

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

64. årgang9. september 2021

---

| Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- |
| | Berigtigelser |
| 2021/C 363 I/01 | Berigtigelse til indkaldelse af ansøgninger med henblik på udvælgelse af den kontrolansvarlige for processuelle garantier i forbindelse med undersøgelser foretaget af Det Europæiske Kontor for Bekæmpelse af Svig (OLAF) — COM/2021/20062 ( EUT C 279 A af 13.7.2021 ) | 1 |

Indhold

Side

Berigtigelser

2021/C 363 I/01

Berigtigelse til indkaldelse af ansøgninger med henblik på udvælgelse af den kontrolansvarlige for processuelle garantier i forbindelse med undersøgelser foretaget af Det Europæiske Kontor for Bekæmpelse af Svig (OLAF) — COM/2021/20062 ( EUT C 279 A af 13.7.2021 )

( EUT C 279 A af 13.7.2021 )

1

---

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

Berigtigelser

| 9.9.2021 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CI 363/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2021

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CI 363/1

---

Berigtigelse til indkaldelse af ansøgninger med henblik på udvælgelse af den kontrolansvarlige for processuelle garantier i forbindelse med undersøgelser foretaget af Det Europæiske Kontor for Bekæmpelse af Svig (OLAF) — COM/2021/20062

(
  Den Europæiske Unions Tidende C 279 A af 13. juli 2021
  )

(2021/C 363 I/01)

Side 3, punkt 4, under »Ansøgningsfrist«, første afsnit:

| I stedet for: | »Ansøgningsfristen er den 9. september 2021. Der lukkes for onlineansøgning kl. 12.00 (middag) Bruxellestid.« |
| --- | --- |

I stedet for:

»Ansøgningsfristen er den 9. september 2021. Der lukkes for onlineansøgning kl. 12.00 (middag) Bruxellestid.«

| læses: | »Ansøgningsfristen er den 23. september 2021. Der lukkes for onlineansøgning kl. 12.00 (middag) Bruxellestid.« |
| --- | --- |

læses:

læses:

»Ansøgningsfristen er den 23. september 2021. Der lukkes for onlineansøgning kl. 12.00 (middag) Bruxellestid.«

---
# C_2012369EN.01001301.xml

| 29.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/13

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 16 July 2012

in Case E-9/11

EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway

(Failure of an EEA State to fulfill obligations — Right of establishment — Free movement of capital — Ownership limitations and voting right restrictions in financial services infrastructure institutions — Proportionality — Legal certainty)

2012/C 369/11

In Case E-9/11, EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway — APPLICATION for a declaration that by maintaining in force restrictions on the rights of persons and undertakings established in EEA States to own holdings and exercise voting rights in financial services infrastructure institutions in Norway, such as provided for in Sections 35(1), (2), and (3) and 36 of the Act of 29 June 2007 No 74 on Regulated Markets (the Stock Exchange Act) and Sections 5-3(1), (2) and (3) and 5-4 of the Act of 5 July 2002 on the Registration of Financial Instruments (the Securities Depositories Act), the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations arising from Articles 31 EEA and 40 EEA, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Per Christiansen and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 16 July 2012, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that, by maintaining in force restrictions on the rights of persons and undertakings established in EEA States to own holdings and exercise voting rights in financial services infrastructure institutions in Norway, such as provided for in Sections 35(1), (2) and (3), and 36 of the Act of 29 June 2007 No 74 on Regulated Markets (the Stock Exchange Act) and Sections 5-3(1), (2) and (3), and 5-4 of the Act of 5 July 2002 on the Registration of Financial Instruments (the Securities Depositories Act), the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations arising from Articles 31 and 40 of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by maintaining in force restrictions on the rights of persons and undertakings established in EEA States to own holdings and exercise voting rights in financial services infrastructure institutions in Norway, such as provided for in Sections 35(1), (2) and (3), and 36 of the Act of 29 June 2007 No 74 on Regulated Markets (the Stock Exchange Act) and Sections 5-3(1), (2) and (3), and 5-4 of the Act of 5 July 2002 on the Registration of Financial Instruments (the Securities Depositories Act), the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations arising from Articles 31 and 40 of the EEA Agreement.

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Norway to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Norway to pay the costs of the proceedings.

---
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned in the capacity indicated hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2,
2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Carter's, Inc. and The William Carter Company.

|Date: April 28, 2005 |  | /s/FREDERICK J. ROWAN, IIFrederick J. Rowan, II Chief
Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 28, 2005 |  | /s/MICHAEL D. CASEYMichael D. Casey Chief Financial Officer            

The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and are not being filed as part of the Report on Form 10-Q
or as a separate disclosure document.

---



QuickLinks
##### 



The following are the Companys significant subsidiaries, as that term
is defined by applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

|                                 |                          |                                   |  |            
|-------------------------------- | ------------------------ | --------------------------------- |  | -----------
|                                 |                          |                                  
|Company Name                     | Country of Incorporation | Proportion of ownership Interest*
|                                 |                          |                                  
|Norsk Hydro Produksjon AS        |                          | Norway                            |  | 100 percent
|                                
|Hydro Aluminium AS               |                          | Norway                            |  | 100 percent
|                                
|Hydro Aluminium Deutschland GmbH |                          | Germany                           |  | 100 percent
|                                

*     Ownership percentage reflects proportion of voting power.

143
# Euroopan unionin C 363I/9. s

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 363I |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 64. vuosikerta9. syyskuu 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 363I

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

64. vuosikerta9. syyskuu 2021

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | Oikaisuja |
| 2021/C 363 I/01 | Oikaisu hakumenettelyyn prosessuaalisten takeiden valvojan valitsemiseksi Euroopan petostentorjuntaviraston (OLAF) tutkimuksia varten – COM/2021/20062 ( EUVL C 279 A, 13.7.2021 ) | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

Oikaisuja

2021/C 363 I/01

Oikaisu hakumenettelyyn prosessuaalisten takeiden valvojan valitsemiseksi Euroopan petostentorjuntaviraston (OLAF) tutkimuksia varten – COM/2021/20062 ( EUVL C 279 A, 13.7.2021 )

( EUVL C 279 A, 13.7.2021 )

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

Oikaisuja

| 9.9.2021 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CI 363/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2021

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CI 363/1

---

Oikaisu hakumenettelyyn prosessuaalisten takeiden valvojan valitsemiseksi Euroopan petostentorjuntaviraston (OLAF) tutkimuksia varten – COM/2021/20062

(
  Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti C 279 A, 13. heinäkuuta 2021
  )

(2021/C 363 I/01)

Sivulla 3, 4 kohdassa, kohdassa ”Rekisteröitymisen määräaika”, ensimmäinen kappale:

| on: | ”Viimeinen rekisteröitymispäivä on 9. syyskuuta 2021. Internetrekisteröityminen päättyy kyseisenä päivänä klo 12.00 Brysselin aikaa.” |
| --- | --- |

on:

”Viimeinen rekisteröitymispäivä on 9. syyskuuta 2021. Internetrekisteröityminen päättyy kyseisenä päivänä klo 12.00 Brysselin aikaa.”

| pitää olla: | ”Viimeinen rekisteröitymispäivä on 23. syyskuuta 2021. Internetrekisteröityminen päättyy kyseisenä päivänä klo 12.00 Brysselin aikaa.” |
| --- | --- |

pitää olla:

pitää olla:

”Viimeinen rekisteröitymispäivä on 23. syyskuuta 2021. Internetrekisteröityminen päättyy kyseisenä päivänä klo 12.00 Brysselin aikaa.”

---