# Official Journal C 399/23 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 399 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6323 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 399

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6323 November 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2020/C 399/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2020/C 399/02 | Appointment of the First Advocate General | 2 |
| 2020/C 399/03 | Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 107 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (urgent preliminary ruling procedure) | 2 |
| 2020/C 399/04 | Election of the Presidents of the Chambers of three Judges | 2 |
| 2020/C 399/05 | Taking of the oath by new Members of the Court | 2 |
| 2020/C 399/06 | Assignment of Judges to Chambers | 3 |
| 2020/C 399/07 | Lists for the purposes of determining the composition of the formations of the Court | 3 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2020/C 399/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

Court of Justice

2020/C 399/02

Appointment of the First Advocate General

2

2020/C 399/03

Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 107 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (urgent preliminary ruling procedure)

2

2020/C 399/04

Election of the Presidents of the Chambers of three Judges

2

2020/C 399/05

Taking of the oath by new Members of the Court

2

2020/C 399/06

Assignment of Judges to Chambers

3

2020/C 399/07

Lists for the purposes of determining the composition of the formations of the Court

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2020/C 399/08 | Case C-485/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Groupe Lactalis v Premier ministre, Garde des Sceaux, ministre de la Justice, Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation, Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 — Provision of food information to consumers — Article 9(1)(i) and Article 26(2)(a) — Mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance of foods — Failure to indicate which might mislead the consumer — Article 38(1) — Matters specifically covered by the harmonisation — Article 39(2) — Adoption of national measures providing for additional mandatory particulars concerning the country of origin or place of provenance of specific types or categories of foods — Conditions — Existence of a proven link between one or several qualities of the foods concerned and their origin or provenance — Concepts of ‘proven link’ and ‘qualities’ — Evidence that the majority of consumers attach significant value to the provision of that information — National measure providing for the mandatory indication of the national, European or non-European origin of milk) | 6 |
| 2020/C 399/09 | Case C-601/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2020 — Prysmian SpA, Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl v European Commission, The Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Pirelli & C. SpA (Appeal — Competition — Cartels — European mark et for submarine and underground power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Single and continuous infringement — Succession of legal entities — Attributability of unlawful conduct — Principle of equal treatment — Distortion of evidence — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 20 — European Commission’s powers of inspection in cartel proceedings — Power to copy data without a prior examination and to examine the data subsequently at the Commission’s premises — Fines) | 7 |
| 2020/C 399/10 | Case C-649/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris — France) — A v Daniel B, UD, AFP, B, L (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Medicinal products for human use not subject to compulsory medical prescription — Online sales — Advertising for a pharmacy’s website — Limitations — Prohibition on discounts where the order exceeds certain amounts and the use of paid referencing — Obligation to require a patient to complete a health questionnaire prior to validation of his or her first order on a pharmacy’s website — Protection of public health — Directive 2000/31/EC — Electronic commerce — Article 2(a) — Information society service — Article 2(h) — Coordinated field — Article 3 — Country-of-origin principle — Derogations — Justification — Protection of public health — Protection of the dignity of the profession of pharmacist — Prevention of the abusive consumption of medicinal products) | 8 |
| 2020/C 399/11 | Case C-743/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rēzeknes tiesa — Latvia) — LSEZ SIA ‘Elme Messer Metalurgs’ v Latvijas Investīciju un attīstības aģentūra (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Structural Funds — European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) — Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 — Article 2(7) — Concept of ‘irregularity’ — Infringement of a provision of EU law resulting from an act or omission on the part of an economic operator — Prejudice caused to the general budget of the European Union — Insolvency of the beneficiary’s sole business partner) | 9 |
| 2020/C 399/12 | Case C-777/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — WO v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Sickness insurance — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 20 — Scheduled treatment — Prior authorisation — Mandatory grant — Conditions — Insured person prevented from applying for prior authorisation — Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 — Article 26 — Assumption of costs of scheduled treatment incurred by the insured person — Procedure for reimbursement — Directive 2011/24/EU — Cross-border healthcare — Article 8(1) — Healthcare that may be subject to prior authorisation — Principle of proportionality — Article 9(3) — Processing of applications for cross-border healthcare — Factors to be taken into account — Reasonable time — Freedom to provide services — Article 56 TFEU) | 9 |
| 2020/C 399/13 | Case C-157/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Ehab Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment) | 11 |
| 2020/C 399/14 | Case C-158/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Razan Othman v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment) | 11 |
| 2020/C 399/15 | Case C-159/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant's name — Action for annulment) | 12 |
| 2020/C 399/16 | Case C-223/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Wiener Neustadt — Austria) — YS v NK (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Directives 2000/78/EC and 2006/54/EC — Scope — Prohibition of indirect discrimination on grounds of age or sex — Justifications — National legislation providing for an amount to be withheld from pensions paid directly to their recipients by undertakings in which the State has a majority participation and for the cancellation of the indexation of the amount of those pensions — Articles 16, 17, 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Applicability — Discrimination on grounds of property — Infringement of the freedom of contract — Infringement of the right to property — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Right to an effective remedy) | 12 |
| 2020/C 399/17 | Case C-233/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège — Belgium) — B. v Centre public d’action sociale de Liège (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/EC — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Third-country national suffering from a serious illness — Return decision — Judicial remedy — Automatic suspensory effect — Conditions — Grant of social assistance — Articles 19 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union) | 13 |
| 2020/C 399/18 | Case C-260/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Bena Properties Co. SA v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant's name — Action for annulment) | 14 |
| 2020/C 399/19 | Case C-261/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Cham Holding Co. SA v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities engaged in activities in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment) | 15 |
| 2020/C 399/20 | Case C-331/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v X (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 98 — Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services — Annex III, point 1 — Definitions of ‘foodstuffs for human consumption’ and ‘products normally used to supplement foodstuffs or as a substitute for foodstuffs’ — Aphrodisiac products) | 15 |
| 2020/C 399/21 | Case C-348/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Drex Technologies SA v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment) | 16 |
| 2020/C 399/22 | Case C-349/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Almashreq Investment Fund v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment) | 16 |
| 2020/C 399/23 | Case C-350/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Souruh SA v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment) | 17 |
| 2020/C 399/24 | Case C-402/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège — Belgium) — LM v Centre public d’action sociale de Seraing (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/CE — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Parent of an adult child suffering from a serious illness — Return decision — Judicial remedy — Automatic suspensory effect — Safeguards pending return — Basic needs — Articles 7, 19 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union) | 17 |
| 2020/C 399/25 | Case C-405/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie — Belgium) — Vos Aannemingen BVBA v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 17(2)(a) — Right to deduct input tax — Services also having benefited third parties — Existence of a direct and immediate link with the taxable person’s economic activity — Existence of a direct and immediate link with one or more output transactions) | 18 |
| 2020/C 399/26 | Case C-516/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — NMI Technologietransfer GmbH v EuroNorm GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 — Exemption of certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market — Annex I — Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) — Definition — Independence test — Article 3(1) — Autonomous enterprise — Article 3(4) — Not included — Indirect control of 25 % of the capital or voting rights by public bodies — Concepts of ‘control’ and ‘public bodies’) | 19 |
| 2020/C 399/27 | Case C-526/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Entoma SAS v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances, Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Food safety — Novel foods and novel food ingredients — Regulation (EC) No 258/97 — Article 1(2)(e) — Concept of ‘food ingredients isolated from animals’ — Placing on the market — Whole insects intended for human consumption) | 20 |
| 2020/C 399/28 | Case C-603/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Špecializovaný trestný súd — Slovakia) — Criminal proceedings against TG, UF (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of the financial interests of the European Union — Article 325 TFEU — Criminal proceedings concerning offences relating to subsidy fraud funded in part from the budget of the European Union — National law not allowing State bodies to obtain, in criminal proceedings, the recovery of subsidies by way of compensation for damage caused by the offences) | 20 |
| 2020/C 399/29 | Case C-612/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — CC v European Parliament (Appeal — Civil service — Judgment of the General Court ruling on remittal from the General Court after the partial annulment of the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 July 2016, CC v Parliament (F-9/12 RENV, EU:F:2016:165) — Recruitment — Open competition EUR/A/151/98 — Errors made by the European Parliament in the management of the list of approved candidates — Material damage — Action to establish non-contractual liability) | 21 |
| 2020/C 399/30 | Case C-195/20 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against XC (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Effects of the surrender — Article 27 — Potential prosecutions for other offences — Specialty rule) | 22 |
| 2020/C 399/31 | Case C-174/20 P: Appeal brought on 24 April 2020 by STADA Arzneimittel AG against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2020 in Case T-487/18 — STADA Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office | 22 |
| 2020/C 399/32 | Case C-362/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 5 August 2020 — Openbaar Ministerie, Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën v Profit Europe NV, Gosselin Forwarding Services NV | 23 |
| 2020/C 399/33 | Case C-395/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 19 August 2020 — EP, GM v Corendon Airlines Turistik Hava Tasimacilik A.S. | 23 |
| 2020/C 399/34 | Case C-420/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 9 September 2020 — criminal proceedings against HN | 24 |
| | General Court |
| 2020/C 399/35 | Case T-144/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Crédit agricole and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination) | 25 |
| 2020/C 399/36 | Case T-145/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination) | 26 |
| 2020/C 399/37 | Case T-146/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — BPCE and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination) | 26 |
| 2020/C 399/38 | Case T-149/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Arkéa Direct Bank and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination) | 27 |
| 2020/C 399/39 | Case T-408/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v EACEA (Arbitration clause — Grant agreement entered into under Erasmus Mundus action programme No 3 for the promotion of higher education — Grant agreement entered into under the programme for lifelong learning — Eligible costs — Debit notes — Repayment of part of the sums advanced — Contractual liability) | 28 |
| 2020/C 399/40 | Case T-421/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Bauer Radio v EUIPO — Weinstein (MUSIKISS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MUSIKISS — Earlier United Kingdom word and figurative marks KISS — Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and Euratom — Transition period — Decision of the Board of Appeal to remit the case to the Opposition Division — Admissibility — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 28 |
| 2020/C 399/41 | Case T-433/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 –Bax v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Career transition support — Eligibility — Legal certainty — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations — Duty of care — Discrimination on grounds of sex — Proportionality — Liability) | 29 |
| 2020/C 399/42 | Case T-510/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Kaddour v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Damage to reputation — Determination of listing criteria) | 30 |
| 2020/C 399/43 | Case T-36/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — PE Digital v EUIPO — Spark Networks Services (ElitePartner) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Figurative EU trade mark ElitePartner — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons) | 30 |
| 2020/C 399/44 | Case T-174/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Vincenti v EUIPO (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Promotion exercises 2014 to 2017 — Decision not to promote the applicant to the AST 8 grade — Right to be heard) | 31 |
| 2020/C 399/45 | Case T-314/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation v Commission (Arbitration clause — Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Development and testing of sensor systems for quality and performance control in baking processes — Bread-Guard Project — Overlap of the project with another project financed under the same programme — Changes to the description of the tasks to be undertaken — Loss of the intellectual property rights required for the execution of the project — Overestimation of the number of people needed each month for the project — Beneficiaries’ duty to provide information — Serious misconduct — Termination by the Commission of the grant agreement) | 31 |
| 2020/C 399/46 | Case T-401/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Brillux v EUIPO — Synthesa Chemie (Freude an Farbe) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark Freude an Farbe in yellow, orange, red, pink, violet, blue, turquoise, dark green, light green and anthracite — Earlier figurative EU trade mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 32 |
| 2020/C 399/47 | Case T-402/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Brillux v EUIPO — Synthesa Chemie (Freude an Farbe) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark Freude an Farbe — Earlier EU figurative mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 33 |
| 2020/C 399/48 | Case T-601/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Osório & Gonçalves v EUIPO — Miguel Torres (in.fi.ni.tu.de) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative EU trade mark in.fi.ni.tu.de — Earlier national word mark INFINITE — Admissibility of evidence — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 47(2) and (3) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) | 33 |
| 2020/C 399/49 | Case T-608/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Veronese Design Company v EUIPO — Veronese (VERONESE) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark VERONESE — Earlier EU word mark VERONESE — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 34 |
| 2020/C 399/50 | Case T-626/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Daw v EUIPO (SOS Loch- und Rissfüller) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark SOS Loch- und Rissfüller — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) | 35 |
| 2020/C 399/51 | Case T-677/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Polfarmex v EUIPO — Kaminski (SYRENA) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark SYRENA — Genuine use of the mark — Extent of use — Proof of use — Articles 18(1) and 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) | 35 |
| 2020/C 399/52 | Case T-381/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 11 September 2020 — Datax v REA (Interim measures — Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Reimbursement of sums paid — Application for interim measures — No urgency) | 36 |
| 2020/C 399/53 | Case T-536/20: Action brought on 25 August 2020 — LU v EIB | 36 |
| 2020/C 399/54 | Case T-554/20: Action brought on 8 September 2020 — Pollinis France v Commission | 38 |
| 2020/C 399/55 | Case T-568/20: Action brought on 4 September 2020 — MF v eu-LISA | 39 |
| 2020/C 399/56 | Case T-577/20: Action brought on 11 September 2020 — Ryanair v Commission | 39 |
| 2020/C 399/57 | Case T-585/20: Action brought on 24 September 2020 — Polwax v Commission | 40 |
| 2020/C 399/58 | Case T-590/20: Action brought on 25 September 2020 — Clariant and Clariant International v Commission | 42 |
| 2020/C 399/59 | Case T-616/20: Action brought on 5 October 2020 — Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — Amigüitos pets & life (THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect) | 42 |
| 2020/C 399/60 | Case T-622/20: Action brought on 9 October 2020 — Aldi v EUIPO (Cachet) | 43 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2020/C 399/08

Case C-485/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Groupe Lactalis v Premier ministre, Garde des Sceaux, ministre de la Justice, Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation, Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 — Provision of food information to consumers — Article 9(1)(i) and Article 26(2)(a) — Mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance of foods — Failure to indicate which might mislead the consumer — Article 38(1) — Matters specifically covered by the harmonisation — Article 39(2) — Adoption of national measures providing for additional mandatory particulars concerning the country of origin or place of provenance of specific types or categories of foods — Conditions — Existence of a proven link between one or several qualities of the foods concerned and their origin or provenance — Concepts of ‘proven link’ and ‘qualities’ — Evidence that the majority of consumers attach significant value to the provision of that information — National measure providing for the mandatory indication of the national, European or non-European origin of milk)

6

2020/C 399/09

Case C-601/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2020 — Prysmian SpA, Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl v European Commission, The Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Pirelli & C. SpA (Appeal — Competition — Cartels — European mark et for submarine and underground power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Single and continuous infringement — Succession of legal entities — Attributability of unlawful conduct — Principle of equal treatment — Distortion of evidence — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 20 — European Commission’s powers of inspection in cartel proceedings — Power to copy data without a prior examination and to examine the data subsequently at the Commission’s premises — Fines)

7

2020/C 399/10

Case C-649/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris — France) — A v Daniel B, UD, AFP, B, L (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Medicinal products for human use not subject to compulsory medical prescription — Online sales — Advertising for a pharmacy’s website — Limitations — Prohibition on discounts where the order exceeds certain amounts and the use of paid referencing — Obligation to require a patient to complete a health questionnaire prior to validation of his or her first order on a pharmacy’s website — Protection of public health — Directive 2000/31/EC — Electronic commerce — Article 2(a) — Information society service — Article 2(h) — Coordinated field — Article 3 — Country-of-origin principle — Derogations — Justification — Protection of public health — Protection of the dignity of the profession of pharmacist — Prevention of the abusive consumption of medicinal products)

8

2020/C 399/11

Case C-743/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rēzeknes tiesa — Latvia) — LSEZ SIA ‘Elme Messer Metalurgs’ v Latvijas Investīciju un attīstības aģentūra (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Structural Funds — European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) — Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 — Article 2(7) — Concept of ‘irregularity’ — Infringement of a provision of EU law resulting from an act or omission on the part of an economic operator — Prejudice caused to the general budget of the European Union — Insolvency of the beneficiary’s sole business partner)

9

2020/C 399/12

Case C-777/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — WO v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Sickness insurance — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 20 — Scheduled treatment — Prior authorisation — Mandatory grant — Conditions — Insured person prevented from applying for prior authorisation — Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 — Article 26 — Assumption of costs of scheduled treatment incurred by the insured person — Procedure for reimbursement — Directive 2011/24/EU — Cross-border healthcare — Article 8(1) — Healthcare that may be subject to prior authorisation — Principle of proportionality — Article 9(3) — Processing of applications for cross-border healthcare — Factors to be taken into account — Reasonable time — Freedom to provide services — Article 56 TFEU)

9

2020/C 399/13

Case C-157/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Ehab Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment)

11

2020/C 399/14

Case C-158/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Razan Othman v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment)

11

2020/C 399/15

Case C-159/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant's name — Action for annulment)

12

2020/C 399/16

Case C-223/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Wiener Neustadt — Austria) — YS v NK (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Directives 2000/78/EC and 2006/54/EC — Scope — Prohibition of indirect discrimination on grounds of age or sex — Justifications — National legislation providing for an amount to be withheld from pensions paid directly to their recipients by undertakings in which the State has a majority participation and for the cancellation of the indexation of the amount of those pensions — Articles 16, 17, 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Applicability — Discrimination on grounds of property — Infringement of the freedom of contract — Infringement of the right to property — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Right to an effective remedy)

12

2020/C 399/17

Case C-233/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège — Belgium) — B. v Centre public d’action sociale de Liège (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/EC — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Third-country national suffering from a serious illness — Return decision — Judicial remedy — Automatic suspensory effect — Conditions — Grant of social assistance — Articles 19 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)

13

2020/C 399/18

Case C-260/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Bena Properties Co. SA v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant's name — Action for annulment)

14

2020/C 399/19

Case C-261/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Cham Holding Co. SA v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities engaged in activities in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment)

15

2020/C 399/20

Case C-331/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v X (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 98 — Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services — Annex III, point 1 — Definitions of ‘foodstuffs for human consumption’ and ‘products normally used to supplement foodstuffs or as a substitute for foodstuffs’ — Aphrodisiac products)

15

2020/C 399/21

Case C-348/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Drex Technologies SA v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment)

16

2020/C 399/22

Case C-349/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Almashreq Investment Fund v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment)

16

2020/C 399/23

Case C-350/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Souruh SA v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment)

17

2020/C 399/24

Case C-402/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège — Belgium) — LM v Centre public d’action sociale de Seraing (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/CE — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Parent of an adult child suffering from a serious illness — Return decision — Judicial remedy — Automatic suspensory effect — Safeguards pending return — Basic needs — Articles 7, 19 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)

17

2020/C 399/25

Case C-405/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie — Belgium) — Vos Aannemingen BVBA v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 17(2)(a) — Right to deduct input tax — Services also having benefited third parties — Existence of a direct and immediate link with the taxable person’s economic activity — Existence of a direct and immediate link with one or more output transactions)

18

2020/C 399/26

Case C-516/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — NMI Technologietransfer GmbH v EuroNorm GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 — Exemption of certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market — Annex I — Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) — Definition — Independence test — Article 3(1) — Autonomous enterprise — Article 3(4) — Not included — Indirect control of 25 % of the capital or voting rights by public bodies — Concepts of ‘control’ and ‘public bodies’)

19

2020/C 399/27

Case C-526/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Entoma SAS v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances, Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Food safety — Novel foods and novel food ingredients — Regulation (EC) No 258/97 — Article 1(2)(e) — Concept of ‘food ingredients isolated from animals’ — Placing on the market — Whole insects intended for human consumption)

20

2020/C 399/28

Case C-603/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Špecializovaný trestný súd — Slovakia) — Criminal proceedings against TG, UF (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of the financial interests of the European Union — Article 325 TFEU — Criminal proceedings concerning offences relating to subsidy fraud funded in part from the budget of the European Union — National law not allowing State bodies to obtain, in criminal proceedings, the recovery of subsidies by way of compensation for damage caused by the offences)

20

2020/C 399/29

Case C-612/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — CC v European Parliament (Appeal — Civil service — Judgment of the General Court ruling on remittal from the General Court after the partial annulment of the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 July 2016, CC v Parliament (F-9/12 RENV, EU:F:2016:165) — Recruitment — Open competition EUR/A/151/98 — Errors made by the European Parliament in the management of the list of approved candidates — Material damage — Action to establish non-contractual liability)

21

2020/C 399/30

Case C-195/20 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against XC (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Effects of the surrender — Article 27 — Potential prosecutions for other offences — Specialty rule)

22

2020/C 399/31

Case C-174/20 P: Appeal brought on 24 April 2020 by STADA Arzneimittel AG against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2020 in Case T-487/18 — STADA Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office

22

2020/C 399/32

Case C-362/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 5 August 2020 — Openbaar Ministerie, Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën v Profit Europe NV, Gosselin Forwarding Services NV

23

2020/C 399/33

Case C-395/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 19 August 2020 — EP, GM v Corendon Airlines Turistik Hava Tasimacilik A.S.

23

2020/C 399/34

Case C-420/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 9 September 2020 — criminal proceedings against HN

24

General Court

2020/C 399/35

Case T-144/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Crédit agricole and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination)

25

2020/C 399/36

Case T-145/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination)

26

2020/C 399/37

Case T-146/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — BPCE and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination)

26

2020/C 399/38

Case T-149/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Arkéa Direct Bank and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination)

27

2020/C 399/39

Case T-408/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v EACEA (Arbitration clause — Grant agreement entered into under Erasmus Mundus action programme No 3 for the promotion of higher education — Grant agreement entered into under the programme for lifelong learning — Eligible costs — Debit notes — Repayment of part of the sums advanced — Contractual liability)

28

2020/C 399/40

Case T-421/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Bauer Radio v EUIPO — Weinstein (MUSIKISS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MUSIKISS — Earlier United Kingdom word and figurative marks KISS — Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and Euratom — Transition period — Decision of the Board of Appeal to remit the case to the Opposition Division — Admissibility — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

28

2020/C 399/41

Case T-433/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 –Bax v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Career transition support — Eligibility — Legal certainty — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations — Duty of care — Discrimination on grounds of sex — Proportionality — Liability)

29

2020/C 399/42

Case T-510/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Kaddour v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Damage to reputation — Determination of listing criteria)

30

2020/C 399/43

Case T-36/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — PE Digital v EUIPO — Spark Networks Services (ElitePartner) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Figurative EU trade mark ElitePartner — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)

30

2020/C 399/44

Case T-174/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Vincenti v EUIPO (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Promotion exercises 2014 to 2017 — Decision not to promote the applicant to the AST 8 grade — Right to be heard)

31

2020/C 399/45

Case T-314/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation v Commission (Arbitration clause — Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Development and testing of sensor systems for quality and performance control in baking processes — Bread-Guard Project — Overlap of the project with another project financed under the same programme — Changes to the description of the tasks to be undertaken — Loss of the intellectual property rights required for the execution of the project — Overestimation of the number of people needed each month for the project — Beneficiaries’ duty to provide information — Serious misconduct — Termination by the Commission of the grant agreement)

31

2020/C 399/46

Case T-401/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Brillux v EUIPO — Synthesa Chemie (Freude an Farbe) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark Freude an Farbe in yellow, orange, red, pink, violet, blue, turquoise, dark green, light green and anthracite — Earlier figurative EU trade mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

32

2020/C 399/47

Case T-402/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Brillux v EUIPO — Synthesa Chemie (Freude an Farbe) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark Freude an Farbe — Earlier EU figurative mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

33

2020/C 399/48

Case T-601/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Osório & Gonçalves v EUIPO — Miguel Torres (in.fi.ni.tu.de) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative EU trade mark in.fi.ni.tu.de — Earlier national word mark INFINITE — Admissibility of evidence — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 47(2) and (3) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)

33

2020/C 399/49

Case T-608/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Veronese Design Company v EUIPO — Veronese (VERONESE) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark VERONESE — Earlier EU word mark VERONESE — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

34

2020/C 399/50

Case T-626/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Daw v EUIPO (SOS Loch- und Rissfüller) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark SOS Loch- und Rissfüller — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001)

35

2020/C 399/51

Case T-677/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Polfarmex v EUIPO — Kaminski (SYRENA) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark SYRENA — Genuine use of the mark — Extent of use — Proof of use — Articles 18(1) and 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

35

2020/C 399/52

Case T-381/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 11 September 2020 — Datax v REA (Interim measures — Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Reimbursement of sums paid — Application for interim measures — No urgency)

36

2020/C 399/53

Case T-536/20: Action brought on 25 August 2020 — LU v EIB

36

2020/C 399/54

Case T-554/20: Action brought on 8 September 2020 — Pollinis France v Commission

38

2020/C 399/55

Case T-568/20: Action brought on 4 September 2020 — MF v eu-LISA

39

2020/C 399/56

Case T-577/20: Action brought on 11 September 2020 — Ryanair v Commission

39

2020/C 399/57

Case T-585/20: Action brought on 24 September 2020 — Polwax v Commission

40

2020/C 399/58

Case T-590/20: Action brought on 25 September 2020 — Clariant and Clariant International v Commission

42

2020/C 399/59

Case T-616/20: Action brought on 5 October 2020 — Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — Amigüitos pets & life (THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect)

42

2020/C 399/60

Case T-622/20: Action brought on 9 October 2020 — Aldi v EUIPO (Cachet)

43

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN