alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                              TERMS OF INVESTMENT

SIZE OF OFFERING

         $100,000.00 to be invested at the execution of merger document by Dan
Mazzie c/o Abcco, 1225 Pratt Avenue, Elk Grove, IL, 60007, ("Investor") that
brings Sonoma Holding Corp, an Illinois corporation, public Wednesday, September
24th.

SONOMA BACKGROUND

         A public Illinois corporation. VictorMaxx Technologies, Inc., (VMAX) is
the shell corporation that will acquire the Sonoma assets on the above mentioned
date. Simultaneously, the VictorMaxx board will resign and the Sonoma partners
are nominated to the public corporation's board, taking control of the
corporation that will then own the Sonoma companies. It is anticipated that
after proper notification to the Securities Exchange Commission and other stock
exchange regulators, VictorMaxx will be renamed Sonoma.

USE OF INVESTED CAPITAL

         A Closing between Sonoma Holding Corp and The Bagel Factory, a
profitable, Skokie-based $600,000 + in annual sales specialty food provider is
scheduled for Friday, Letter of Intent has been executed that will enable Sonoma
Holdings, Inc., a profitable, fast growing diversified Illinois holding
corporation with a projected $4.5M in annual 1997 sales, to provide financing
acquire The Bagel Factory. Part of the Offering will finance the acquisition
cost. Sonoma will expand the working capital base of The Bagel Factory with the
remaining funds. Sonoma expects to seek additional funding offered by a
registered broker-dealer later in the year to finance further growth at other
Sonoma holdings and acquisitions yet to be identified.

COMPENSATION TO INVESTOR

         The Investor's $100,000 will be structured under the following manner:

         Sonoma Holdings/VMAX hereby sells and the Investor hereby buys
         1,000,000 shares of VictorMaxx Technologies, Inc./Sonoma shares at a
         price of $.10 per share. The VMAX shares are restricted and will be
         delivered within thirty days.

         Sonoma Holdings/VMAX hereby guarantees a put provision attaching to
         these shares enabling the Investor to "put" the shares to the company
         at any time during a thirty day period beginning September 24th, 1998
         for a price of $.25 per share, for a total repurchase price of
         $250,000.00. This put provision grants rights to the Investor that are
         triggered only at the Investor's election.

COMPANY FINANCIAL REPORTING

         Investors will have access to quarterly and annual income statements
and balance


<PAGE>

sheets filed by the company with the Securities & Exchange Commission and
reported using Generally Accepted Accounting Principals(GAAP).

WITHDRAWAL

         In addition to the put provision, Investor may sell shares or the Note
privately at any time and may sell shares to the public once certain
registration and/or holding conditions (as defined by the Securities & Exchange
Act of 1993) have been met.



 /s/ Terrence L. Donati
------------------------------              ------------------------------
Terrence L. Donati                          Dan Mazzie
CEO Sonoma
#### § 327.32 Determination of aggregate credit amount.

The aggregate amount of the one-time credit shall equal $4,707,580,238.19.
# C_2014138EN.01002901.xml

| 8.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/29

---

State aid — Decision to close an existing aid case as a result of acceptance of appropriate measures by an EFTA State

(2014/C 138/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has proposed appropriate measures, which were accepted by Norway, on the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 12 February 2014 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Decision number | : | 55/14/COL |
| Case number | : | 70957 |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Title | : | Financing of safety training courses by county schools |
| Legal basis | : | The Education Act of 17 July 1998 No 61 |
| Objective | : | n.a. |
| Economic sectors | : | Education |
| Other information | : | Based on measures undertaken and further commitments given by the Norwegian authorities to amend the current financing regime of safety training courses by county schools, the Authority’s concerns regarding the incompatibility of the county schools’ financing of safety training courses were dispelled and the investigation closed. |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

12 February 2014

Decision number

Decision number

:

55/14/COL

Case number

Case number

:

70957

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Title

Title

:

Financing of safety training courses by county schools

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

The Education Act of 17 July 1998 No 61

Objective

Objective

:

n.a.

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Education

Other information

Other information

:

Based on measures undertaken and further commitments given by the Norwegian authorities to amend the current financing regime of safety training courses by county schools, the Authority’s concerns regarding the incompatibility of the county schools’ financing of safety training courses were dispelled and the investigation closed.

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Elcom
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Form 10-KSB.

Dated: April 11, 2005                      /s/ Laurence F. Mulhern
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Laurence F. Mulhern
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)

      The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a
separate disclosure document.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12

- 1 40 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 

## Application to Amend

Section 333 Exemption No. 11351 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 10 81

May 4 , 2015

Petitioner: b izUAS Corp Bernd Lutz, PhD CEO 4845 Pearl East Circle, Suite 101 Boulder, CO 80301 Te l: 303.931.4126 Email: bernd@bizUAS.com Website: www.bizUAS.com

Greetings , By l etter from the FAA dated April 17 , 2015, an exemption was granted to bizUAS Corp for relief under S ection 333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption No. 11351 Reg ulatory Docket No. FAA

2014

- 1081

.
bizUAS C orp hereby requests that the exemption so granted be amended to include DJI Phantom 3 , service

- drone Recon One , and service

- drone Blackbird models . Re levant facts and reasoning are:

 DJI has anno u nced that they will discontinue the Phantom 2 model which was approved in bizUAS ’ Exemption No. 11351

.

 Siz e, weight and performance specification of the DJI Phantom 3 (“P3”) are substantially similar to those of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ (“P2”) in all relevant respects:

o Gross weight: P3=1280g; P2=1242g.

o Diagonal Size (including propellers): P3=590mm; P2=579m m.

o Maximum Ascent Speed: P3=5m/sec; P2=6m/sec.

o Maximum Descent Speed: P3=3m/sec; P2=2m/sec.

o Vertical Hover Accuracy: P3=+/

- 10cm; P2= +/

- 80cm.

o Horizontal Hover Accuracy : P3=+/

- 1m; P2=+/

- 2.5m.

o Maximum Speed: P3=16m/sec; P2=15m/sec.

 s ervice

- drone Recon One and Blackbird are part of the G4 family of industrial

- grade, mission

proven (in Europe) service

- drone mul ti

- rotor UAS

. All service

- drone G4 UA S use the same flight control and RC transmitter category and are built with similar components

. The G4 family include s the service

- drone Eagle V2 which was approved under bizUAS ’ FAA Exemption No. 11351 . The Eagle is larger (in terms of r otor diameter and AUW) than both, Recon One and Blackbird.

 The findings, rationale and conclusions contained in FAA’s Exemption No. 11351 apply without modification to this application to include the DJI Phanto m 3, service

- drone Recon One, and service

- drone Blackbird in Exemption No. 11351

.Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any a dditional

information that may be required.

Sincerely,

Bernd Lutz, PhD CEO, bizUAS Corp
#### §§ 380.28-380.29 [Reserved]
```

Exhibit 99.1

                             CERTIFICATION OF 10QSB

I, Douglas Larson of Eldorado Artesian Springs,  Inc. (the "Company"),  certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
     ended   September  30,  2002  (the   "Report")   fully  complies  with  the
     requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                          /s/ Douglas Larson
Dated: November 14, 2002
```
EXHIBIT 99.1



Certification



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Richard B. Hollis, Chief Executive
Officer of Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), and Daniel D. Burgess, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:



1.    The
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and the
results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.



By:

/s/    RICHARD B.
HOLLISRichard B. HollisChairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive
Officer)




Dated:  March 11, 2003



|
|
|
|



Dated:  March
11, 2003
§ 347.201 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) This subpart is issued pursuant to sections 5(c) and 10(b)(4) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act)(12 U.S.C. 1815(c) and 1820(b)(4)) and sections 6, 7, and 15 of the International Banking Act of 1978 (IBA)(12 U.S.C. 3104, 3105, and 3109).
( b ) This subpart implements the insured branch asset pledge and examination commitment requirement for foreign banks in the FDI Act. It also implements the deposit insurance, permissible activity, and cross-border cooperation provisions of the IBA regarding the FDIC. Sections 347.203-347.211 apply to state and federal branches whose deposits are insured. Sections 347.204 and 347.207 are applicable to depository institution subsidiaries of a foreign bank. Section 347.212 applies to insured state branches and §§ 347.213-347.216 apply to state branches whose deposits are not insured by the FDIC.
§ 303.83 Transactions that require notice, but not prior notice. ( a ) *Notice within 90 days after the acquisition.* The following acquisitions of voting securities of a covered institution, which otherwise would require prior notice under this subpart, instead require the acquirer to provide to the appropriate FDIC office within 90 calendar days after the acquisition all relevant information requested by the FDIC: ( 1 ) The acquisition of voting securities as a bona fide gift;
( 2 ) The acquisition of voting securities in satisfaction of a debt previously contracted in good faith, except as provided in § 303.82(c); and
( 3 ) The acquisition of voting securities through inheritance.
( b ) *Notice within 90 days after receiving notice of the event giving rise to the acquisition of control.* The following acquisitions of control of a covered institution, which otherwise would require prior notice under this subpart, instead require the person acquiring control to provide to the appropriate FDIC office, within 90 calendar days after receiving notice of the event giving rise to the acquisition of control, all relevant information requested by the FDIC: ( 1 ) The acquisition of control resulting from a redemption of voting securities by the issuing covered institution; and
( 2 ) The acquisition of control as a result of any event or action (including without limitation the sale of securities) by any third party that is not within the control of the person acquiring control.
( c ) The FDIC may disapprove a notice filed after an acquisition of control, and nothing in this section limits the authority of the FDIC to disapprove a notice pursuant to § 303.86(c).
( d ) The relevant information that the FDIC may require under this section may include all information and documents routinely required for a prior notice as provided in § 303.85.
( e ) If the FDIC disapproves a Notice filed under this § 303.83, the notificant(s) must divest control of the covered institution which may include, without limitation, disposing of some or all of the voting securities so that the notificant(s) is no longer in control of the covered institution, within such period of time and in the manner that the FDIC may determine.
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epolin, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August  31,  2004,
as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned certifies,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley  Act  of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's  knowledge,
that:

      (1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and

       (2)   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated: January 11, 2005       By: /s/ Murray S. Cohen
                              Murray S. Cohen,
                              Chairman of the Board and
                              Chief Executive Officer


Dated: January 11, 2005       By: /s/ James Ivchenko
                              James Ivchenko,
                              President (Principal Financial
                              Officer)
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A1 36 9 . BRENT HANCOCK v . J I LL HANCOCK.

Bren t Han co ck ’ s m o t i on t o wi t h d raw h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y GRANTED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## March 16, 2018

03/16/2018
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 309

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study to determine 

the feasibility of increasing the capacity of water storage, increasing 

power generation, improving water supply reliability and quality, improving water management efficiency, and improving ecosystem function and 

flood control on the San Joaquin River through the construction of 

a reservoir at Temperance Flat and other reasonable measures. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2003

Mr. NUNES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study 

to determine the feasibility of increasing the capacity 

of water storage, increasing power generation, improving 

water supply reliability and quality, improving water 

management efficiency, and improving ecosystem function and flood control on the San Joaquin River through 

the construction of a reservoir at Temperance Flat and 

other reasonable measures.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 309 IH 

1 SECTION 1. UPPER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN STUDY. 

2 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

3 ‘‘San Joaquin River Restoration Act’’. 

4 (b) AUTHORIZATION.—Not later than 3 years after 

5 the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary 

6 of the Interior shall complete a feasibility study of the 

7 Upper San Joaquin River Basin in California, to deter8 mine the feasibility of increasing the capacity of water 

9 storage, increasing power generation, improving water 

10 supply reliability and quality, improving water manage11 ment efficiency, and improving ecosystem function and 

12 flood control on the San Joaquin River through the con13 struction of a reservoir at Temperance Flat and other rea14 sonable measures. 

15 (c) MATCHING FUNDS.—

16 (1) MATCH REQUIRED.—Before conducting the 

17 study under this section, the Secretary shall require 

18 assurances that fifty percent of the cost of the study 

19 shall be paid with local funds. 

20 (2) SOURCE OF LOCAL FUNDS.—Local funds 

21 required under paragraph (1) shall be provided from 

22 the Central Valley Project Restoration Fund estab23 lished under section 3407 of the Central Valley 

24 Project Improvement Act (Public Law 102–575). 

25 (d) FEDERAL COST NONREIMBURSABLE.—Federal 

26 funds expended for the study shall not be reimbursed. 
3

•HR 309 IH 

1 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

2 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec3 essary to carry out this section.

Æ
6 - 25 - 2012 **Description of spreadsheet files used for cost analysis**

There are 5 total Excel spreadsheet files sorted into two groups. The first group contains the primary and sensitivity analysis files.

 pm_naaqs v0.8.7_analysis_main.xlsx: Includes the primary analyses for each of the alternate standards (see Chapter 7).

 pm_na aqs v0.8.8_sensitivity full.xlsx : Includes the sensitivity analyses for each of the alternate standards (see Appendix 7A). The second group contains three input data files including known control measures and air quality ratios used in the cost analyses .  pm_8.7 data0 .xlsx : Group 1 control measures and air quality ratio inputs .  pm_8.7 data1.xlsx : Group 2 control measures .  pm_8.7 data2.xlsx : Group 3 control measures .
§ 242.4 Significant nonbank financial companies and significant bank holding companies. For purposes of Title I of the Dodd-Frank Act, the following definitions shall apply: ( a ) *Significant nonbank financial company.* A “significant nonbank financial company” means— ( 1 ) Any nonbank financial company supervised by the Board; and
( 2 ) Any other nonbank financial company that had $100 billion or more in total consolidated assets (as determined in accordance with applicable accounting standards) as of the end of its most recently completed fiscal year.
( b ) *Significant bank holding company.* A “significant bank holding company” means any bank holding company or company that is, or is treated in the United States as, a bank holding company, that had $100 billion or more in total consolidated assets as of the end of the most recently completed calendar year, as reported on either the Federal Reserve's FR Y-9C (Consolidated Financial Statement for Holding Companies), or any successor form thereto, or the Federal Reserve's Form FR Y-7Q (Capital and Asset Report for Foreign Banking Organizations), or any successor form thereto.
[84 FR 59096, Nov. 1, 2019]
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.333-81741, 333-114933, and 333-133846 on Forms S-8 of our reports relating to the consolidated financial statements of Perry Ellis International, Inc. and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingdated April 18, 2008, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Perry Ellis International, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2008. 

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Miami, Florida 

April 18,2008
# C_2020381EN.01003001.xml

| 12.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/30

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2020/C 381/12)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 31 July 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85513 |
| Decision No | 100/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Amendment to the COVID-19 liquidity support grant scheme for undertakings in the tourism sector (aid to micro or small enterprises in difficulty on 31 December 2019) |
| Legal basis | The letter of additional assignment to the budget 2020 from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries and the Guidelines for grants to improve liquidity and enable the restructuring and reopening of the tourism industry (MNOK 250) dated 3 July 2020 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | NOK 250 million |
| Duration | 6 July 2020 – 31 December 2020 |
| Economic sectors | Tourism sector (NACE 49, 50, 51, 55, 56, 77, 79, 90, 91 and 93) |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Innovation Norway
  Akersgata 13
  0104 Oslo
  NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

31 July 2020

Case No

85513

Decision No

100/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Amendment to the COVID-19 liquidity support grant scheme for undertakings in the tourism sector (aid to micro or small enterprises in difficulty on 31 December 2019)

Legal basis

The letter of additional assignment to the budget 2020 from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries and the Guidelines for grants to improve liquidity and enable the restructuring and reopening of the tourism industry (MNOK 250) dated 3 July 2020

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

NOK 250 million

Duration

6 July 2020 – 31 December 2020

Economic sectors

Tourism sector (NACE 49, 50, 51, 55, 56, 77, 79, 90, 91 and 93)

Name and address of the granting authority

Innovation Norway

Akersgata 13

0104 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---