52916 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

you cannot positively determine that a 

P/N 101584–1 or –2 disc assembly is not 

installed, within the next 30 days after the 

effective date of this AD or within the next 

100 hours TIS after the effective date of this 

AD, whichever occurs first, inspect the tail 

rotor driveshaft system to determine if 

P/N 101584–1 or –2 is installed. 

(3) If, during the maintenance records 

check required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD 

or during the inspection required in 

paragraph (f)(2) of this AD, you can 

positively determine that a P/N 101584–1 or 

–2 disc assembly is not installed, no further 

action is required. Before further flight, make 

an entry in the log book showing compliance 

with this AD. 

(4) If, during the maintenance records 

check required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD 

or during the inspection required in 

paragraph (f)(2) of this AD, you can 

positively determine that a P/N 101584–1 or 

–2 disc assembly is installed, within the next 

30 days after the effective date of this AD or 

within the next 100 hours TIS after the 

effective date of this AD, whichever occurs 

first, replace disc assembly P/N 101584–1 or 

–2 with disc assembly P/N 32721–1. 

(5) As of the effective date of this AD, do 

not install disc assembly P/N 101584–1 or –2. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ 

or service information as follows: No 

differences. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(g) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, 

FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs 

for this AD, if requested using the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to 

ATTN: Sharon Miles, Aerospace Engineer, 

FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, 2601 Meacham 

Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone: 

(817) 222–5122; fax: (817) 222–5961. Before 

using any approved AMOC on any airplane 

to which the AMOC applies, notify your 

appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the 

FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), 

or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(h) Refer to MCAI Transport Canada, AD 

No. CF–2010–07, dated February 24, 2010; 

Bell Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin No. 

206–09–123, REV A, dated June 10, 2009; 

and Bell Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin 

No. 206L–09–157, REV A, dated June 10, 

2009, for related information. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 19, 

2010. 

Mark R. Schilling, 

Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21589 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0107; FRL–9190–1] 

RIN–2060–AQ45 

Action To Ensure Authority To Issue 

Permits Under the Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration Program to 

Sources of Greenhouse Gas 

Emissions: Federal Implementation 

Plan 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of public hearing. 

SUMMARY: The EPA is announcing a 

public hearing to be held for the 

proposed rule ‘‘Action to Ensure 

Authority to Issue Permits under the 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

Program to Sources of Greenhouse Gas 

Emissions: Federal Implementation 

Plan’’ which will publish in the near 

future in the Federal Register. The 

hearing will be held on September 14, 

2010, in Arlington, VA. 

DATES: The public hearing will be held 

on September 14, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: The September 14, 2010 

hearing will be held at the EPA Ariel 

Rios East building, Room 1153, 1301 

Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 

20460. The public hearing will convene 

at 9 a.m. (Eastern standard time) and 

continue until the later of 6 p.m. or 1 

hour after the last registered speaker has 

spoken. The EPA will make every effort 

to accommodate all speakers that arrive 

and register. A lunch break is scheduled 

from 12:30 p.m. until 2 p.m. Because 

this hearing is being held at U.S. 

government facilities, individuals 

planning to attend the hearing should be 

prepared to show valid picture 

identification to the security staff in 

order to gain access to the meeting 

room. In addition, you will need to 

obtain a property pass for any personal 

belongings you bring with you. Upon 

leaving the building, you will be 

required to return this property pass to 

the security desk. No large signs will be 

allowed in the building, cameras may 

only be used outside of the building, 

and demonstrations will not be allowed 

on federal property for security reasons. 

The EPA Web Site for the rulemaking, 

which includes the proposal and 

information about the public hearing, 

can be found at: http://www.epa.gov/ 

nsr. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you would like to present oral testimony 

at the public hearing, please contact Ms. 

Pamela Long, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality 

Planning and Standards, Air Quality 

Planning Division, (C504–03), Research 

Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone 

(919) 541–0641, fax number (919) 541– 

5509, e-mail address: long.pam@epa.gov 

(preferred method for registering), no 

later than September 10, 2010. If using 

e-mail, please provide the following 

information: Time you wish to speak 

(morning, afternoon, evening), name, 

affiliation, address, e-mail address, and 

telephone and fax numbers. 

Questions concerning the August 

2010 proposed rule should be addressed 

to Ms. Lisa Sutton, U.S. EPA, Office of 

Air Quality Planning and Standards, 

New Source Review Group, (C504–03), 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, 

telephone number (919) 541–3450, email at sutton.lisa@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

public hearing is to provide the public 

an opportunity to present oral 

comments regarding EPA’s proposed 

‘‘Action to Ensure Authority to Issue 

Permits under the Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration Program to 

Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 

Federal Implementation Plan,’’ which 

proposes a Federal Implementation Plan 

to apply in any state that is unable to 

submit, by its deadline, a corrective 

State Implementation Plan revision to 

ensure that the state has authority to 

issue permits under the Clean Air Act’s 

New Source Review Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration program for 

sources of greenhouse gases. 

Public hearing: The proposal for 

which EPA is holding the public 

hearing will publish in the near future 

in the Federal Register and is available 

at: http://www.epa.gov/nsr and also in 

the rulemaking docket. The public 

hearing will provide interested parties 

the opportunity to present data, views, 

or arguments concerning the proposal. 

The EPA may ask clarifying questions 

during the oral presentations, but will 

not respond to the presentations at that 

time. Written statements and supporting 

information submitted during the 

comment period will be considered 

with the same weight as oral comments 

and supporting information presented at 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52917 

the public hearing. Written comments 

on the proposed rule must be 

postmarked by October 14, 2010, 30 

days after the September 14, 2010 

hearing. 

Commenters should notify Ms. Long if 

they will need specific equipment, or if 

there are other special needs related to 

providing comments at the hearing. The 

EPA will provide equipment for 

commenters to show overhead slides or 

make computerized slide presentations 

if we receive special requests in 

advance. Oral testimony will be limited 

to 5 minutes for each commenter. The 

EPA encourages commenters to provide 

EPA with a copy of their oral testimony 

electronically (via e-mail or CD) or in 

hard copy form. 

The hearing schedule, including lists 

of speakers, will be posted on EPA’s 

Web Site http://www.epa.gov/nsr. 

Verbatim transcripts of the hearings and 

written statements will be included in 

the docket for the rulemaking. 

EPA will make every effort to follow 

the schedule as closely as possible on 

the day of the hearing; however, please 

plan for the hearing to run either ahead 

of schedule or behind schedule. 

How can I get copies of this document 

and other related information? 

The EPA has established a docket for 

the proposed rule ‘‘Action to Ensure 

Authority to Issue Permits under the 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

Program to Sources of Greenhouse Gas 

Emissions: Federal Implementation 

Plan’’ under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2010–0107 (available at http:// 

www.regulations.gov). 

As stated previously, the proposed 

rule will publish in the near future in 

the Federal Register and is available at 

http://www.epa.gov/nsr and in the 

rulemaking docket. 

Dated: August 24, 2010. 

Mary Henigin, 

Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning 

and Standards. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21691 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Defense Acquisition Regulations 

System 

48 CFR Parts 211, 246, and 252 

Defense Federal Acquisition 

Regulation Supplement (DFARS); 

Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items, 

DFARS Case 2009–D018 

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition 

Regulations System, Department of 

Defense (DoD). 

ACTION: Proposed rule with request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend 

the Defense Federal Acquisition 

Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to 

implement a policy memorandum of the 

Undersecretary of Defense for 

Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics 

dated February 6, 2007, that required 

definition of the requirements to track 

warranties for items subject to Item 

Unique Identification in the Item 

Unique Identification registry. This 

proposed rule stresses that the 

enforcement of warranties is essential to 

the effectiveness and efficiency of DoD’s 

material readiness. 

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule 

should be submitted in writing to the 

address shown below on or before 

October 29, 2010, to be considered in 

the formation of the final rule. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by DFARS Case 2009–D018, 

using any of the following methods: 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include 

DFARS Case 2009–D018 in the subject 

line of the message. 

Fax: 703–602–0350. 

Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations 

System, Attn: Mr. Julian E. Thrash, 

OUSD (AT&L) DPAP/DARS, Room 

3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon, 

Washington, DC 20301–3060. 

Comments received generally will be 

posted without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Julian E. Thrash, 703–602–0310. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Background 

The Undersecretary of Defense for 

Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics 

issued a policy memorandum dated 

February 6, 2007, that instructed the 

Director, Defense Procurement and 

Acquisition Policy, to define the 

requirements to track warranties for 

items subject to Item Unique 

Identification (IUID) in the IUID 

registry. This proposed rule addresses 

the requirement to more effectively 

track warranties for IUID items. 

The tracking of warranties, from the 

identification of the requirement to the 

expiration date of the warranted item, 

will enhance significantly the ability of 

DoD to take full advantage of warranties 

when they are part of an acquisition. 

Presently, DoD lacks the enterprise 

capability that would provide visibility 

and accountability of warranty data 

associated with acquired goods. The 

capability to track warranties will result 

in— 

(a) Reduced costs; 

(b) Ability to recognize benefits 

included for free; 

(c) Ability to compare performance 

against Government specified 

warranties; 

(d) Increased level of insurance for 

purchased goods; 

(e) Sufficient durations of warranties 

for specific goods; 

(f) Ability to identify and enforce 

warranties (e.g., against fraudulent 

vendors, or for criminal actions). 

DoD proposes the following changes: 

• Revise DFARS 211.274–2(a)(4), 

Policy for unique item identification, to 

add any warranted item. 

• Revise the definitions of 

‘‘acceptance’’ and ‘‘defect,’’ and add a 

definition for ‘‘warranty tracking’’ at 

DFARS 246.701. 

• Add DFARS 246.710(5) to include 

provision and clause prescriptions 

252.246–70XX and 252.246–70YY. 

• Revise DFARS 252.211–7003, Item 

Identification and Valuation, definition 

of ‘‘issuing agency.’’ 

• Add provision 252.246–70XX, 

Notice of Warranty Tracking of 

Serialized Items. 

• Add clause 252.246–70YY, 

Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items. 

This is not a significant regulatory 

action and, therefore, was not subject to 

review under section 6(b) of Executive 

Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and 

Review, dated September 20, 1993. This 

is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. 

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

DoD has prepared an initial regulatory 

flexibility analysis consistent with 5 

U.S.C. 603 et seq. A copy of the analysis 

may be obtained from the point of 

contact specified herein. The objective 

of this rule is for DoD to develop a more 

effective way to track warranties for 

items subject to Item Unique 

Identification (IUID). Presently, DoD 

lacks the enterprise capability that 

would provide visibility and 

accountability of warranty data 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS