alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 1221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-246]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel, Conte Centers for Basic and Translational Mental 
Health Research.
    Date: February 23, 2009.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: St. Gregory Hotel, 2033 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036.
    Contact Person: Vinod Charles, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd, 
Room 6151, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-1606.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel, Social Neuroscience Panel.
    Date: March 5, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: St. Gregory Hotel, 2033 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036.
    Contact Person: Allan F. Mirsky, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Room 6157, MSC 9609, Bethesda, MD 20892-9609, 301-443-0004, 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 5, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-246 Filed 1-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44228

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

GEORGE KUUALOHA ANA, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 353

Filed: February 3, 2017

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Elmore County. Hon. Jonathan Medema, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period 

of confinement of five years, for lewd conduct with a minor under 

sixteen, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

George Kuualoha Ana, Jr., pled guilty to lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen. Idaho 

Code § 18-1508. The district court sentenced Ana to a unified term of ten years with five years 

determinate. Ana appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by refusing to 

place him on probation.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Ana’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
vSrl-Q" 

Carbon Foot Print of 4' Refrigerated Open Display Case 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

• lbs Co2 over life of product 

' ·-

C02 448A R290 W Elec Pan R407C R407A
# C_2017224EN.01001601.xml

| 13.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/16

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 31 March 2017

in Case E-13/16

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to comply — Directive 2000/30/EC — Technical roadside inspections)

(Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to comply — Directive 2000/30/EC — Technical roadside inspections)

(2017/C 224/07)

In Case E-13/16, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland — APPLICATION for a declaration that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act referred to at point 17h of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement (Directive 2000/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 June 2000 on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Community) by not introducing the technical roadside inspections required by Article 3(1) of the Act, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen and Páll Hreinsson (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 31 March 2017, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations arising from the Act referred to at point 17h of Chapter II of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2000/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 June 2000 on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Community), as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, by not introducing, within the time prescribed, the technical roadside inspections required by Article 3(1) of the Act. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations arising from the Act referred to at point 17h of Chapter II of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2000/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 June 2000 on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Community), as adapted to the Agreement under its Protocol 1, by not introducing, within the time prescribed, the technical roadside inspections required by Article 3(1) of the Act.

| 2. | Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.19

Second Amendement to First Purchase Common Stock Warrant, Dated February 18,
2000, Second Purchase Common Stock Warrant, Dated February 18, 2000, and
Subscription and Investment Agreement, Dated February 18, 2000, Between View
Systems and Rubin Investment Group

Insert here
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic Conferences of the International Air Transport Association OST-2012- 

## IJO &

## .J

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS BY THE INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION

lATA AGREEMENT APPROVED & IMMUNIZED DOCKETOST-_L&_- 

## d1Jle3 ACTIONDATE

# ~,;(J-s; 2-111'1..- This approval andgrant ofantitrust immunity is subject, where applicable, to conditions previously imposed. This action ;,, effective after 7days unless apetition is filed under

. 14 CFR 38S.3(J orareview is undertaken on the Department's own motiOn. ln view ofthe agreement's noncontroversial nature and the availability of the above dur ,the 21- X erio · R.303.42 is waived.

23 April 2012 Communications with respect to this document should be sentto Douglas E. Lavin Regional Vice President

- North America International AirTransport Association 1776 K.St. N.W. #12th Floor Washington DC 20006
#### § 3.61 Purpose and scope.

Sections 3.61 through 3.63 of this subpart establish public disclosure requirements related to the capital requirements described in subpart B of this part for a national bank or Federal savings association with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more as reported on the national bank's or Federal savings association's most recent year-end Call Report that is not an advanced approaches national bank or Federal savings association making public disclosures pursuant to § 3.172. An advanced approaches national bank or Federal savings association that has not received approval from the OCC to exit parallel run pursuant to § 3.121(d) is subject to the disclosure requirements described in §§ 3.62 and 3.63. A national bank or Federal savings association with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more as reported on the national bank's or Federal savings association's most recent year-end Call Report that is not an advanced approaches national bank or Federal savings association making public disclosures subject to § 3.172 must comply with § 3.62 unless it is a consolidated subsidiary of a bank holding company, savings and loan holding company, or depository institution that is subject to the disclosure requirements of § 3.62 or a subsidiary of a non-U.S. banking organization that is subject to comparable public disclosure requirements in its home jurisdiction. For purposes of this section, total consolidated assets are determined based on the average of the national bank's or Federal savings association's total consolidated assets in the four most recent quarters as reported on the Call Report or the average of the national bank or Federal savings association's total consolidated assets in the most recent consecutive quarters as reported quarterly on the national bank's or Federal savings association's Call Report if the national bank or Federal savings association has not filed such a report for each of the most recent four quarters.

[84 FR 35256, July 22, 2019]
§ 192.305 Distribution of offering circular. ( a ) *Preliminary offering circular.* A savings association may distribute a preliminary offering circular at the same time as or after it mails the proxy statement to its members.
( b ) *Early distribution prohibited.* A savings association may not distribute a final offering circular for stock issued in the transaction until after the appropriate Federal banking agency declares the offering circular effective or the Securities and Exchange Commission declares the registration statement for the offering circular effective. The savings association must have the offering circular delivered in accordance with this part.
( c ) *Effective offering circular.* A savings association must distribute a final offering circular for stock issued in the transaction to persons listed in its plan of conversion within 10 calendar days after the appropriate Federal banking agency declares the offering circular effective or the Securities and Exchange Commission declares the registration statement for the offering circular effective.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> USDOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             724
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     82,595
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,593
<PP&E>                                          47,037
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 320,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,866
<BONDS>                                        146,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,892
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,908
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   320,971
<SALES>                                         75,201
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,201
<CGS>                                           47,809
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,809
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,382
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,023
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,013)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,474
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,539)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 32.4 Calculation of lending limits. ( a ) *Calculation date.* For purposes of determining compliance with 12 U.S.C. 84, and 12 U.S.C. 1464(u), as applicable, and this part, a national bank or savings association shall determine its lending limit as of the most recent of the following dates: ( 1 ) The last day of the preceding calendar quarter; or
( 2 ) The date on which there is a change in the bank's or savings association's capital category for purposes of 12 U.S.C. 1831o and 12 CFR 6.3 or 12 CFR 324.402, as applicable.
( b ) *Effective date.* ( 1 ) A national bank's or savings association's lending limit calculated in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section will be effective as of the earlier of the following dates: ( i ) The date on which the bank's or savings association's Call Report is submitted; or
( ii ) The date on which the bank's or savings association's Call Report is required to be submitted.
( 2 ) A national bank's or savings association's lending limit calculated in accordance with paragraph (a)(2) of this section will be effective on the date that the limit is to be calculated.
( c ) *More frequent calculations.* If the appropriate Federal banking agency determines for safety and soundness reasons that a national bank or savings association should calculate its lending limit more frequently than required by paragraph (a) of this section, the appropriate Federal banking agency may provide written notice to the national bank or savings association directing it to calculate its lending limit at a more frequent interval, and the national bank or savings association shall thereafter calculate its lending limit at that interval until further notice.
[63 FR 15746, Apr. 1, 1998, as amended at 77 FR 37278, June 21, 2012; 79 FR 11312, Feb. 28, 2014]
#### § 210.1 Authority, purpose, and scope.

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) has issued this subpart pursuant to the Federal Reserve Act, sections 11 (i) and (j) (12 U.S.C. 248 (i) and (j)), section 13 (12 U.S.C. 342), section 16 (12 U.S.C. 248(o) and 360), and section 19(f) (12 U.S.C. 464); the Expedited Funds Availability Act (12 U.S.C. 4001 *et seq.*); the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (12 U.S.C. 5001-5018) and other laws. This subpart governs the collection of checks and other cash and noncash items and the handling of returned checks by Federal Reserve Banks. Its purpose is to provide rules for collecting and returning items and settling balances.

[53 FR 21984, June 13, 1988, as amended at Reg. J, 59 FR 22965, May 4, 1994; Reg. J, 69 FR 62557, Oct. 27, 2004]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7481

KENNETH BRIAN JOYNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. C. COMBS, Major; MAJOR FLEMING; A. DAVID ROBINSON, Warden; ADAM HARVEY, Assistant Warden; M. HENSLEY, ICA-TPS; W. R. HENSLEY, IHO; LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Director; C. STANLEY, Sergeant; CAPTAIN JANEWAY; SERGEANT GREER; SERGEANT PETERS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00377-jct) Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 28, 2008 Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Brian Joyner, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kenneth Brian Joyner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Joyner v. Combs , No. 7:06-cv-00377-jct (W.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Margaret Hynnes, Respondent, *v.*The Metropolitan Street Railway Co., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of affirmance of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury.

Henry A. Robinson (Charles F. Brown, of counsel), for appellant.

Alfred & Charles Steckler, for respondent.

Per *Curiam.*

The plaintiff testified that she signalled to the conductor to stop the car when he passed Ninety-seventh street; that the car stopped at Ninety-eighth street, and as she was about getting off, it was suddenly started, and she was thrown to the ground, and received severe injuries. That the car stopped at *706Ninety-eighth street is denied by but one person, the conductor of the car, who testified that the car had not, to his recollection, stopped at Ninety-eighth street. The other witnesses would not swear that the car had not stopped at Ninety-eighth street. The case presented a question of fact for the jury, and there being evidence to sustain the verdict, the case presents no question of law for our consideration.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Elcom
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Form 10-KSB.

Dated: April 11, 2005                      /s/ Robert J. Crowell
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert J. Crowell
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

      The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a
separate disclosure document.
§ 250.404 Serving as director of member bank and corporation selling own stock. ( a ) The Board recently considered the question whether section 32 of the Banking Act of 1933 (12 U.S.C. 78) would be applicable to the service of a director of a corporation which planned to acquire or organize, as proceeds from the sale of stock became available, subsidiaries to operate in a wide variety of fields, including manufacturing, foreign trade, leasing of heavy equipment, and real estate development. The corporation had a paid-in capital of about $60,000 and planned to sell additional shares at a price totaling $10 million, with the proviso that if less than $3 million worth were sold by March 1962, the funds subscribed would be refunded. It thus appeared to be contemplated that the sale of stock would take at least a year, and there appeared to be no reason for believing that, if the venture proved successful, additional shares would not be offered so that the corporation could continue to expand.
( b ) The Board concluded that section 32 would be applicable, stating that although § 218.102, as clarified by § 218.104, related to closed-end investment companies, the rationale of that interpretation is applicable to corporations generally.
[26 FR 2456, Mar. 23, 1961. Redesignated at 61 FR 57289, Nov. 6, 1996]
# C_2022484EN.01002901.xml

| 20.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 484/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 484/29

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2022/C 484/11)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Estonia

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Estonia

Subject of commemoration: The 150th anniversary of the founding of the Society of Estonian Literati

Description of the design: The design depicts the pages of a book and the tip of a quill pen. At the top, in semi-circle are the inscription ‘EESTI KIRJAMEESTE SELTS’ and the year of issuance ‘2022’. The inscription on the pages of the book reads ‘KUI ME EI SAA SUUREKS RAHVAARVULT, PEAME SAAMA SUUREKS VAIMULT’, meaning ‘If we cannot be a great nation in number, we must be great in spirit’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 1 000 000

Date of issue: First quarter 2022

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---