alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

l Thr rahool dlrtrlot in quaation hsa l ppllad for 

tranrportatlon rid only under tha tarnu oi tha above 

quota pM@TSph it a0 lir8 With all Of tha OOnditiCN 

1a t out in 8ho pray 3 In thrt it rrooirrr no Other 

typa or rid, rlthor 8uition or ul.ary and ir mmda a9 

or more than threr conaclldatrd dlatrlotr and oontains 

rlrty rqcmxa lilra of territory mid t&y ballrto that 

theil F p r liOtitiO rhowr II 8 naad for traMpOrbtiOn aid. 

_- "^"""-----*n" 8. v.3 . . -*.l."=D I. A caZA"I"I*I.L OCI"IOY "*&.I.. U,"OYSD ,* T"X AlToIYI" G~YI".L 0" ,I",, *s,l*T.*T 
P; 

=sJ: . . 
c 

rohool dirtriot la qu*atlozl 

tionrld l # rpplld for, 

foqrr nry truly 

ATTOfUI3T OZ?iitH~ 07 T6IAS 

/a/ L. H. nawallhn 

81 

L. 8. nawa11.n 

Aanlatant
<TABLE> <S> <C>



        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET, THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, AND THE STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          48,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  201,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    201,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               471,700
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,756,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          502,159
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        794
<COMMON>                                        43,524
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,353,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,711,755
<SALES>                                      1,083,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,083,532
<CGS>                                          273,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  814,296
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            269,236
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   269,236
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.006
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.006


</TABLE>
#### § 263.13 Change of time limits.

Except as otherwise provided by law, the ALJ may, for good cause shown, extend the time limits prescribed by the Uniform Rules or by any notice or order issued in the proceedings. After the referral of the case to the Board pursuant to § 263.38, the Board may grant extensions of the time limits for good cause shown. Extensions may be granted at the motion of a party after notice and opportunity to respond is afforded all non-moving parties or on the Board's or the ALJ's own motion.
# C_2015282EN.01000201.xml

| 27.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/2

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2015/C 282/02)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 7 May 2015 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 755092 |
| Decision No | : | 178/15/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Name of the beneficiary | : | Tromsø municipality |
| Type of measure | : | Public funding subject to a detailed assessment under Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA agreement |
| Scheme | : | N/A |
| Objective | : | Sports, recreation, education |
| Form of aid | : | Grant and loan |
| Aid amount | : | NOK 600 million |
| Economic sectors | : | Public baths |
| Name and address of the granting authorities | : | 1. | The Municipality of Tromsø, Rådhuset |
| Postboks 6900 Langnes |
| N-9299 Tromsø |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

7 May 2015

Case No

Case No

:

755092

Decision No

Decision No

:

178/15/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Name of the beneficiary

Name of the beneficiary

:

Tromsø municipality

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Public funding subject to a detailed assessment under Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA agreement

Scheme

Scheme

:

N/A

Objective

Objective

:

Sports, recreation, education

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Grant and loan

Aid amount

Aid amount

:

NOK 600 million

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Public baths

Name and address of the granting authorities

Name and address of the granting authorities

:

1.

The Municipality of Tromsø, Rådhuset

Postboks 6900 Langnes

N-9299 Tromsø

NORWAY

| 2. | The County Municipality of Troms, |
| --- | --- |
| Postboks 6600 |
| N-9296 Tromsø |
| NORWAY |

2.

The County Municipality of Troms,

Postboks 6600

N-9296 Tromsø

NORWAY

| 3. | The Norwegian Ministry of Culture, |
| --- | --- |
| Postboks 8030 Dep |
| N-0030 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

3.

The Norwegian Ministry of Culture,

Postboks 8030 Dep

N-0030 Oslo

NORWAY

| 4. | The Norwegian Lottery and Trust Authority, |
| --- | --- |
| Storehagen 1B, Postboks 800 |
| N-6805 Førde |
| NORWAY |

4.

The Norwegian Lottery and Trust Authority,

Storehagen 1B, Postboks 800

N-6805 Førde

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
§ 269b.430 Contents of notice of hearing. The notice of hearing shall include: ( a ) A copy of the charge;
( b ) A statement of the time of the hearing which shall be not less than 10 days after service of the notice of hearing, except in extraordinary circumstances. All charges involving a “refusal to bargain” allegation and all charges, if sustained, that would require the setting aside of an election, or the conducting of a new election shall be given first priority;
( c ) A statement of the place and nature of hearing;
( d ) A statement of the legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held;
( e ) A reference to the particular section of the policy and rules and regulations of this chapter involved;
( f ) A copy of the determination, if any, made causing the invocation of these formal proceedings.
# C_2015275EN.01000201.xml

| 20.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 275/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 275/2

---

Dangerous substances — List of authorisation decisions taken by the EEA EFTA States in accordance with Article 64(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) in the second half of 2014

(2015/C 275/02)

Subcommittee I on the free movement of goods

Subcommittee I on the free movement of goods

To be noted by the EEA Joint Committee

To be noted by the EEA Joint Committee

With reference to EEA Joint Committee Decision No. 25/2008 of 14 March 2008, the EEA Joint Committee is invited to note the following list concerning authorisation decisions adopted on the basis of Article 64(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) for the period 1 July – 31 December 2014, at their meeting on 20 March 2015.

---

ANNEX

List of authorisation decisions

The following authorisation decisions in accordance with Article 64(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) have been taken in the EEA EFTA States during the period 1 July – 31 December 2014:

| Substance name | Commission Decision under Article 64(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 | Country | Date of decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) | C(2014) 5551 final | Norway | 4 September 2014 |

Substance name

Commission Decision under Article 64(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006

Country

Date of decision

Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)

C(2014) 5551 final

Norway

4 September 2014

---
# EUR-Lex - - EN

*|*

#

**Judgment of the Court of 10 December 2010 in Case E-8/10 — EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Republic of Iceland (Failure by a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligations — Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications) **

*
Official Journal C 148 , 19/05/2011 P. 0003 - 0003 *

Judgment of the Court

of 10 December 2010

in Case E-8/10

EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Republic of Iceland

(Failure by a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligations — Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications)

2011/C 148/03

In Case E-8/10, EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Republic of Iceland — APPLICATION for a declaration that by failing, within the time prescribed, to adopt, or to notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority of, all the measures necessary to fully implement into its national legislation the Act referred to at point 1 of Annex VII to the EEA Agreement, i.e. Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, the Republic of Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 63 of the Directive and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Thorgeir Örlygsson and Henrik Bull (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 10 December 2010, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

1. declares that, by failing to adopt, within the time limit prescribed, all the measures necessary to fully implement the Act referred to at point 1 of Annex VII to the EEA Agreement, i.e. Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, the Republic of Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 63 of the Directive and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement;

2. orders the Republic of Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.

--------------------------------------------------
# C_2021369EN.01001301.xml

| 14.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/13

---

Corrigendum to Notice of open competition

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 363 of 9 September 2021
  )

(2021/C 369/03)

On page 2:

for:

‘The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal of the European Union C ... A of 9 September 2021.’,

read:

‘The competition notice is published in 24 languages in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 363 A of 9 September 2021.’.

---
AGO-03.31.2015-10Q Ex. 10.1


Exhibit 10.1


Director Compensation Summary


We currently pay our non-management directors an annual retainer of $240,000 per year, $120,000 of which is paid in cash and $120,000 of which is paid in restricted stock. A director may elect to receive his or her entire annual retainer (including the additional annual retainer amounts described below) in restricted stock.


Restricted stock vests on the day immediately prior to the first annual general meeting of shareholders at which directors are elected following the grant of the stock.  However, if, prior to such vesting date, either (i) a change in control (as defined in the Assured Guaranty Ltd. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended) of Assured Guaranty Ltd. occurs before the director terminates service on the Board or (ii) the director terminates service on the Board as a result of such director’s death or disability, then the restricted stock will vest on the date of such change in control or the date of the director’s termination of service, whichever is applicable. Grants of restricted stock receive cash dividends and have voting rights. 


Our Share Ownership Guidelines require that each director own the greater of (i) at least 25,000 Common Shares or (ii) Common Shares with a market value of at least three times the maximum cash portion of the annual director retainer, before being permitted to dispose of any shares acquired as compensation from the Company. Once a director has reached the Share Ownership Guideline, for so long as he or she serves on the Board, such director may not dispose of any Common Shares if such disposition would cause the director to be below the Share Ownership Guideline. Vested restricted stock, vested restricted stock units (i.e., units for which Common Shares will be received by a director six months after termination of such director’s service on the Board), and purchased shares will all count toward the Stock Ownership Guideline.


In addition to the annual retainer described above:


		
	•
	The Chairman of the Board receives an additional $125,000 annual retainer




		
	•
	The Chairman of each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Finance Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, and the Risk Oversight Committee receives an additional $30,000 annual retainer




		
	•
	Members, other than the chairman, of each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Finance Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Risk Oversight Committee receive an additional $15,000 annual retainer.




Members of the Executive Committee do not receive any additional compensation.


The Company generally will not pay a fee for attendance at board or committee meetings, although the Chairman of the Board has the discretion to pay attendance fees of $2,000 for extraordinary or special meetings.
EX-32
       SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF EPHREN TAYLOR

                  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of City Capital
Corporation ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


Dated: May 15, 2005                    /s/ Ephren Taylor
                                       Ephren Taylor
                                       Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2




				Exhibit 99(i)

		 	   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
			       18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report  of  Datascension,  Inc.  (the"Company")
on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended  September 30 , 2005 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  D. Scott  Kincer,   Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section  906  of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies  with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results of  operations  of  the
Company.

                                      /s/ D. Scott Kincer
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                      D. Scott Kincer
					Principal Accounting Officer

Dated: February 10, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.13

                         [CANON SALES CO., INC. LETTERHEAD]


                           MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

This memorandum of understanding is to clarify the mutual understanding
between HPL, Inc. (hereinafter called "HPL") and Canon Sales Co., Inc.
(hereinafter called "Canon Sales") with regards to their business
relationship under the Business Agreement executed by the parties on the 15th
of March, 2000 (hereinafter called the "Agreement"), and the Master Software
License Agreement referenced therein.

Both parties agree that:

1.   Canon Sales is HPL's distributor for HPL Products in Japan. Canon Sales
     purchases HPL Products from HPL, imports the HPL Products into Japan,
     and sells the HPL Products in Japan as "media" or "systems" to its
     customers (hereinafter called "Customers").

2.   No license is granted to Canon Sales under the Agreement except as
     necessary to fulfill its obligations thereunder, including limited
     utilization of the HPL Products for demonstration, evaluation and
     performance of support activity purposes.

3.   Canon Sales does not have the right to license or sublicense the HPL
     Products, and all references to or incidents of the terms "licenses" or
     "licensing" in the Agreement are clerical errors to be stricken and
     disregarded.

4.   The Master Software License Agreement is to be replaced by an End-User
     Software Agreement that more accurately reflects the terms under which
     Customers may purchase HPL Products.

5.   All sales to Customers by Canon Sales are subject to the End-User
     Software Agreement. Payment terms for such sales could be determined
     between Canon Sales and Customers. Customers make no payments to HPL for
     HPL Products.

6.   With respect to Section 3.10 of the Agreement, only Demonstration
     Products that are superseded by updated Products shall be exchanged by
     Supplier for the upgraded Product at no additional charge upon return of
     the outdated Product to Supplier. New Demonstration Products shall be
     purchased subject to Section 4.3 of the Agreement.


HPL Inc.                               Canon Sales Co., Inc.



/s/ David Y. Lepejian                  /s/ Ken Horikawa
-----------------------------          ------------------------------
David Y. Lepejian                      Ken Horikawa
President & CEO                        Division General Manager
                                       Semiconductor Equipment Sales HQ

Feb 20, 2000                           Jan. 17, 2001
-----------------------------          ------------------------------
Date                                   Date
### Conference Call with Tribal Environmental Professionals August 4, 2008 Meeting Note to the Docket

Discussion Topics

On August 4, 2008

, representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) participated in a meeting with a workgroup of inter ested tribal environmental professionals regarding the implementation of the rule titled: “Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country.” The attendees discussed the following :

• EPA Region 5 Source Inventory

• Final Draft of Tips for Consultat ion Document

• Source Categories for Which General Permits Might Be Developed

• Fact Sheet about Tribal NSR Rules

• Development of Model Codes to Request Delegation of the NSR Program

• Modifications to 40 CFR 52.21(u)

– Current regulatory text does not allow

dele gation of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) to Tribes

As an outcome of the meeting, participants began drafting a document titled: “Effective Public Involvement in Indian country”.
Docket No. FAA-2012-0185

. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 12-09-10

Regional Airline Association Dave Lotterer

Connie

Arnold

12-09-10

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 12-09-10

ATA Joe White 12-09-10
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-75811) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option
Plan, Amended and restated 1988 Stock Option Plan, and Amended and Restated 1992 Stock Option Plan of Thomas Group, Inc. of our report dated February 16, 2005 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Thomas Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP

Dallas,
Texas
March 28, 2005

---



QuickLinks
§ 3.31 Mechanics for calculating risk-weighted assets for general credit risk. ( a ) *General risk-weighting requirements.* A national bank or Federal savings association must apply risk weights to its exposures as follows: ( 1 ) A national bank or Federal savings association must determine the exposure amount of each on-balance sheet exposure, each OTC derivative contract, and each off-balance sheet commitment, trade and transaction-related contingency, guarantee, repo-style transaction, financial standby letter of credit, forward agreement, or other similar transaction that is not: ( i ) An unsettled transaction subject to § 3.38;
( ii ) A cleared transaction subject to § 3.35;
( iii ) A default fund contribution subject to § 3.35;
( iv ) A securitization exposure subject to §§ 3.41 through 3.45; or
( v ) An equity exposure (other than an equity OTC derivative contract) subject to §§ 3.51 through 3.53.
( 2 ) The national bank or Federal savings association must multiply each exposure amount by the risk weight appropriate to the exposure based on the exposure type or counterparty, eligible guarantor, or financial collateral to determine the risk-weighted asset amount for each exposure.
( b ) Total risk-weighted assets for general credit risk equals the sum of the risk-weighted asset amounts calculated under this section.