alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021423EN.01000901.xml

| 19.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

18 October 2021

(2021/C 423/07)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1604 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4400 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84438 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0375 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0712 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 150,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7643 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,453 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 361,35 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5787 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9490 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 10,7740 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5707 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4384 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0268 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6436 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5659 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 377,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,1217 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4617 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5085 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 371,79 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8406 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,025 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 82,7185 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,827 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,3651 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,7177 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 87,4083 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1604

JPY

Japanese yen

132,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4400

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84438

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0375

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0712

ISK

Iceland króna

150,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7643

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,453

HUF

Hungarian forint

361,35

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5787

RON

Romanian leu

4,9490

TRY

Turkish lira

10,7740

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5707

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4384

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0268

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6436

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5659

KRW

South Korean won

1 377,90

ZAR

South African rand

17,1217

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4617

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5085

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 371,79

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8406

PHP

Philippine peso

59,025

RUB

Russian rouble

82,7185

THB

Thai baht

38,827

BRL

Brazilian real

6,3651

MXN

Mexican peso

23,7177

INR

Indian rupee

87,4083

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 08/23 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
§ 16.3 Registration statement and prospectus requirements. ( a ) No person shall offer or sell, directly or indirectly, any national bank or Federal savings association issued security unless: ( 1 ) A registration statement for the security meeting the requirements of § 16.15 of this part has been filed with and declared effective by the OCC pursuant to this part, and the offer or sale is accompanied or preceded by a prospectus that has been filed with and declared effective by the OCC as a part of that registration statement; or
( 2 ) An exemption is available under § 16.5 of this part.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, securities of a national bank or Federal savings association may be offered through the use of a preliminary prospectus before a registration statement and prospectus for the securities have been declared effective by the OCC if: ( 1 ) A registration statement including the preliminary prospectus has been filed with the OCC;
( 2 ) The preliminary prospectus contains the information required by § 16.15 of this part except for the omission of information with respect to the offering price, underwriting discounts or commissions, discounts or commissions to dealers, amount of proceeds, conversion rates, call prices, or other matters dependent upon the offering price; and
( 3 ) A copy of the prospectus as declared effective containing the information specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section is furnished to each purchaser prior to or simultaneously with the sale of the security.
( c ) SEC Rule 174 (17 CFR 230.174—Delivery of prospectus by dealers; Exemptions under section 4(a)(3) of the Act) applies to transactions by dealers in national bank and Federal savings association issued securities.
[59 FR 54798, Nov. 2, 1994, as amended at 82 FR 8107, Jan. 23, 2017]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3209 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3209

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Reclamation Project Authorization Act of 1972 to clarify 
 the acreage for which the North Loup division is authorized to provide 
        irrigation water under the Missouri River Basin project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF ACREAGE FOR IRRIGATION WATER.

    Section 501 of the Reclamation Project Authorization Act of 1972 
(43 U.S.C. 615dddd) is amended by striking ``fifty-three thousand 
acres'' and inserting ``approximately 53,000 acres''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TRAVIS TRUSEDALE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 310 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
§ 303.122 Processing. ( a ) *Expedited processing.* A notice filed by an insured state bank seeking to commence or continue an activity under § 362.3(a)(2)(iii)(A)(2), § 362.4(b)(3)(i), or § 362.4(b)(5) of this chapter will be acknowledged in writing by the FDIC and will receive expedited processing, unless the applicant is notified in writing to the contrary and provided a basis for that decision. The FDIC may remove the notice from expedited processing for any of the reasons set forth in § 303.11(c)(2). Absent such removal, a notice processed under expedited processing is deemed approved 30 days after receipt of a complete notice by the FDIC (subject to extension for an additional 15 days upon written notice to the bank) or on such earlier date authorized by the FDIC in writing.
( b ) *Standard processing for applications and notices that have been removed from expedited processing.* For an application filed by an insured state bank seeking to commence or continue an activity under § 362.3(a)(2)(iii)(A)(2), § 362.3(b)(2)(i), § 362.3(b)(2)(ii)(A), § 362.3(b)(2)(ii)(C), § 362.4(b)(1), § 362.4(b)(4), § 362.5(b)(2), or § 362.8(b) or seeking a waiver or modification under § 362.18(e) or § 362.18(g)(3) of this chapter or for notices which are not processed pursuant to the expedited processing procedures, the FDIC will provide the insured State bank with written notification of the final action as soon as the decision is rendered. The FDIC will normally review and act in such cases within 60 days after receipt of a completed application or notice (subject to extension for an additional 30 days upon written notice to the bank), but failure of the FDIC to act prior to the expiration of these periods does not constitute approval.
§ 48.14 Supervision. ( a ) *Supervision by the national bank.* A national bank engaging in retail forex transactions must diligently supervise the handling by its officers, employees, and agents (or persons occupying a similar status or performing a similar function) of all retail forex accounts carried, operated, or advised by at the national bank and all activities of its officers, employees, and agents (or persons occupying a similar status or performing a similar function) relating to its retail forex business.
( b ) *Supervision by officers, employees, or agents.* An officer, employee, or agent of a national bank must diligently supervise his or her subordinates' handling of all retail forex accounts at the national bank and all the subordinates' activities relating to the national bank's retail forex business.
§ 362.10 Definitions. For the purposes of this subpart, the definitions provided in § 362.2 apply. Additionally, the following definitions apply to this subpart: ( a ) *Affiliate* has the same meaning as provided in subpart B of this part.
( b ) *Corporate debt securities not of investment grade* means any corporate debt security that when acquired was not rated among the four highest rating categories by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The term shall not include any obligation issued or guaranteed by a corporation that may be held by a Federal savings association without limitation as to percentage of assets under subparagraphs (D), (E), or (F) of section 5(c)(1) of HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1464(c)(1) (D), (E), (F)).
( c ) *Insured state savings association* means any state-chartered savings association insured by the FDIC.
( d ) *Qualified affiliate* means, in the case of a stock insured state savings association, an affiliate other than a subsidiary or an insured depository institution. In the case of a mutual savings association, “qualified affiliate” means a subsidiary other than an insured depository institution provided that all of the savings association's investments in, and extensions of credit to, the subsidiary are deducted from the savings association's capital.
( e ) *Service corporation* means any corporation the capital stock of which is available for purchase by savings associations.
[63 FR 66326, Dec. 1, 1998, as amended at 66 FR 1029, Jan. 5, 2001]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 198 (Thursday, October 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24823]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6786]


Department of State Performance Review Board Members

    In accordance with section 4314(c)(4) of 5 United States Code, the 
Department of State has appointed the following individuals to the 
Department of State Performance Review Board for career Senior 
Executive Service members:

Joan E. Donoghue, Principal Deputy Legal Adviser, Office of the Legal 
Adviser, Department of State;
Raymond D. Maxwell, Director, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, 
Department of State; (Outside Member);
James L. Millette, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Resource 
Management, Department of State;
Margaret J. Pollack, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Population, 
Refugees and Migration, Department of State; and
Ruth A. Whiteside, Director, Foreign Service Institute, Department of 
State.

    Dated: October 7, 2009.
Steven A. Browning,
Acting Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human 
Resources, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-24823 Filed 10-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-15-P
Prepared in cooperation with the

MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND COMMERCE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 93-4129
Depth to water, soil permeability, land use/land cover, and relative susceptibility to contamination SHEET 2 OF 2

Moreland, R'S., and O'Hara, C.G... 1993, Susceptibility of major aquifers to surface contamination—
Holmes, Humphreys, Issaquena, Sharkey, Washington, and Yazoo Counties, Mississippi

MISSISSIPPI RIVER ALLUVIAL AQUIFER OUTCROP AREA

SPARTA AQUIFER
OUTCROP AREA

COCKFIELD AQUIFER OUTCROP AREA

[HM 75 cor DISCHARGE AREA)

| AREAS NOT EVALUATED

Figure 5.—Depth to water for outcrop area of major aquifers.

Base from U. S. Geological Survey digital data, 1:100,000, 1982, 1984
Lambert Conformal Conic Projection
‘Standard parallels 33° and 45°, central meridian 90°00’

MISSISSIPPI RIVER ALLUVIAL AQUIFER OUTCROP AREA

¥ SPARTA AQUIFER
OUTCROP AREA

[EB surrace water
[__] AREAS NOT EVALUATED

Figure 6.--Soil permeability for outcrop areas of major aquifers.

SPARTA AQUIFER
OUTCROP AREA

a7 COCKFIELD AQUIFER OUTCROP AREA COCKFIELD A R OUTCROP AREA
.e0" —_EXPLANATION - © ae 7 ON:
..
od” DEPTH TO WATER, IN FEET a = EXPLANATION
[os EXPLANATION Gl vrsaneurr-up Lanp
SOIL PERMEABILITY, INCHES PER HOUR
Hs GE Acricutrura Lanp
(0) fice permeaBmry ¢0.6)
Hl i530 GM Forest Lanp
GE MoveraTe PERMEABILITY (0.2-0.6)
HB 2050 Gy water
HI Low Permeasmry (<0.2)
HE 5075 (0) wertann

GM Barren Lanp
[__] AREAS Nor EVALUATED

Figure 7.--Land use/land cover for outcrop areas of major aquifers.

33°00’ =

al

MISSISSIPPI RIVER ALLUVIAL AQUIFER OUTCROP AREA

SPARTA AQUIFER OUTCROP AREA

COCKFIELD AQUIFER OUTCROP AREA

EXPLANATION

RELATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY CATEGORIES WITHIN MAJOR AQUIFER
OUTCROP AREAS TO SURFACE CONTAMINATION

_<tiliesils AGN SCALE 1
j Russellvill 2
ie 1:250,000 P
= (a) 10 20 MILES
32°30’ — } ; L_ | 4
() 10 20 KILOMETERS

AREAS NOT EVALUATED

Hi

Base modified from U.S. Geological Survey
State base map, 1:500,000, 1972

Figure 8.--Relative susceptibility of outcrop areas of major aquifers to surface contamination.

For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from:
Susceptibility of Major Aquifers to Surface Contamination--
Holmes, Humphreys, Issaquena, Sharkey, Washington, and Yazoo

Counties, Mississippi

US. Geological Survey
100 W. Capitol Street, Suite 710
Jackson, Mississippi 39269

U.S. Geological Survey

Earth Science Information Center
Open-File Reports Section

Box 25286, MS 517

Denver Federal Center

Denver, CO 80225
By

RICHARD S. MORELAND AND CHARLES G. O’HARA
1993
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3084

To amend the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001 to extend 

the deadline for filing a claim to December 31, 2004. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2003

Mr. CONYERS (for himself, Mr. NADLER, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. WEINER, Mr. 

SCHIFF, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. SCOTT of Georgia, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, 

Mr. SANDERS, Mr. CROWLEY, and Mr. MORAN of Virginia) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund 

of 2001 to extend the deadline for filing a claim to 

December 31, 2004.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘September 11th Victim 

5 Compensation Fund Extension Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 3084 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO FILE A CLAIM TO DE2 CEMBER 31, 2004. 

3 Section 405(a) of September 11th Victim Compensa4 tion Fund of 2001 (Public Law 107–42; 49 U.S.C. 40101 

5 note) is amended by striking paragraph (3) and inserting 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘(3) LIMITATION.—No claim may be filed 

8 under paragraph (1) after December 31, 2004.’’.

Æ
FINAL JUDGMENT.

(Lucas Circuit Court,

January Term, 1894]

Bentley, Haynes and Scribner, JJ.

#### State of Ohio v. J. M. Bour.

In Prosecutions eor Selling adulterated Vinegar.

In action, commenced before a justice, for the sale of adulterated vinegar, the judgment of the common pleas court, in favor of the defendant, is final as to the state.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas county.

Bentley, J.

Bour was prosecuted before a justice of the peace of Lucas county for a violation of the statute regarding the sale of adulterated vinegar, and convicted, and sentenced to pay a fine and the costs of prosecution, and the cost of analyzing and inspecting said vinegar. On Bonr’s petition in error in the court of *5common pleas, that court reversed the judgment of the justice, and an exception was entered on behalf of the state. This petition in error is now presented to the circuit court to reverse the judgment cf the court of common pleas.

*Held:*That the circuit court has no jurisdiction of such an action and that the said judgment of the common pleas is final as to the state. See State v. Simmons, 49 O. S., 305.
EXHIBIT 23


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to the Quad Systems Corporation 1986 Stock Option Plan and Quad
Systems Corporation 1993 Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-04755) and the Quad
Systems Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No. 33-93436) of our
report dated October 31, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Quad Systems Corporation included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 1997.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 26, 1997
#### § 303.140 Scope.

This subpart sets forth procedures for complying with the notice and application requirements contained in subpart C of part 362 of this chapter, governing insured state savings associations and their service corporations engaging in activities which are not permissible for federal savings associations and their service corporations. This subpart also sets forth procedures for complying with the notice requirements contained in subpart D of part 362 of this chapter, governing insured savings associations which establish or engage in new activities through a subsidiary.
#### AMERICAN MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON, RESPONDENT, v. REBECCA CHODOSH ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Argued February 6, 1940 —

Decided May 2, 1940.

For the respondent, *Edward B. McGlynn.*

*562For the appellants, *Fleming & Potter, Russell Fleming*and *Morgan R. Seifert.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered *per curiam*in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— Case, Donges, Postee, Heteield, Deae, WolesKeil, JJ. 6.

*For reversal*— The Chancellor, Peeskie, Wells, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 5.
§ 349.13 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* An FDIC-supervised insured depository institution that engages in retail forex transactions shall comply with the requirements of this part.
( b ) *Purpose.* This part establishes rules applicable to retail forex transactions engaged in by FDIC-supervised insured depository institutions and applies on or after the effective date.
( c ) *Scope.* Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, this part applies to FDIC-supervised insured depository institutions.
( d ) *International applicability.* Sections 349.15 and 349.17 through 349.28 do not apply to retail foreign exchange transactions between a foreign branch of an FDIC-supervised IDI and a non-U.S. customer. With respect to those transactions, an FDIC-supervised IDI must comply with any disclosure, recordkeeping, capital, margin, reporting, business conduct, documentation, and other requirements of applicable foreign law.
[76 FR 40789, July 12, 2011. Redesignated and amended at 80 FR 74912, Nov. 30, 2015]
#### Thomas J. Lee, Respondent, *v.*Smith, Gray & Company, Appellant.

Appeax from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

John T. Easton, for appellant.

Arthur Hurst, for respondent.

Schuchman, J.

The action is brought to recover damages for the breach of a contract of employment of the plaintiff as a salesman and general manager of the defendant’s merchant tailoring department from on or about the 28th day of February, 1898, to January 1, 1899, at a weekly salary of forty dollars and a commission of five per cent, on all sales 'made through the plaintiff’s personality or personal efforts. The plaintiff claims that he was wrongfully discharged on October 25, 1898. The burden *793of proof to establish the contract of employment for the aforesaid period was on the plaintiff. The plaintiff, to substantiate said contract, testified as a witness on his own behalf that one Hillard F. Smith, who acted fon and on behalf of the defendant, told him, *“*You will have a commission upon every sale, and in addition to that you will have, by the first of January a certain profit upon the showing department,” and “ After I was about four months in the employ of the defendant, said Smith told me (You run this department until the first of January,’ and Smith asked me ‘ How long will it take you to stop ’ (meaning to finish the work which I then had on hand) ? I said I might be able to get through this work in a week, in a month or perhaps not until the first of January.” Thomas McCord, a witness called on behalf of the plaintiff, testified as follows: *“*I heard Mr. Lee (the plaintiff) ask for a specific engagement and I heard Mr. Smith say that his word was good enough for an engagement up to the end of the year. I do not know what his idea was, he said that his word was good enough to the end of the year.” This is all the evidence in the case in regard to the establishment of the contract of employment. The defendant denies that there was an employment for a fixed period. In our opinion, this evidence is insufficient to establish a contract of employment for the period mentioned.

The verdict, therefore, is not sustained by the evidence and the judgment and order appealed from are reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

-McCarthy, J., concurs.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.