alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
                           CERTIFICATION

I, James Ivchenko, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Epolin, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;

     4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

          (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small
business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

          (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially
affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a)  All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the
small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

          (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in
the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.


Dated: January 14, 2004       By: /s/ James Ivchenko
                              James Ivchenko,
                              President (Principal Financial Officer)
42675.

#### HUTCHINSON v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY.

Pannell, Judge.

The brief of the appellant together with the enumeration of errors must be filed within 10' days after the record on appeal is filed and docketed in this court. See Rules 13 (a) and 15 (a) adopted May 18, 1966, and effective as of July 1, 1966; Section 14 of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965, as amended (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29; Ga. L. 1965, pp. 240, 243, § 2). It follows therefore, in the present case, where the record was filed and docketed in this court on February 7, 1967, that the last day for filing the brief and enumeration of errors was Friday, February 17, 1967. And where the brief was filed February 10, 1967, but the enumeration of errors was not filed in this court until February 21, 1967, and a certified copy of an enumeration of errors filed in the trial court on February 20, 1967, was filed in this court on March 2, 1967, the appeal, on motion of appellee, must be dismissed. *Napier v. Napier,*222 Ga. 681 (151 SE2d 712).

*667
      *Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*

Submitted April 4, 1967

Decided April 28, 1967.

*Emmett P. Johnson,*for appellant.

*Sharpe, Sharpe & Hartley, T. Malone Sharpe,*for appellee.

*Appeal dismissed.*
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 21

- 00231

- CV

IN RE Michael Andrew DAVIS and Waterfleet, LLC , Relator s

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Beth Watkins , Justice Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 9, 2021

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. We may

issue writs of mandamus when “agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs.” T EX

.

G OV ’ T C ODE § 22.221(b). For mandamus, a relator has the burden to file a petition and record

show ing “ the trial court abused its discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists .” In re

H.E.B. G rocery Co., L.P. , 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam).

Having reviewed the petition and record, we conclude relators have not satisfied their burden.

Accordingly, we deny the petition and motion for temporary relief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CI13387 pending in the 150th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Larry Noll presiding.
H. R. 3288

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to make technical corrections with

respect to the definition of qualifying State.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS RELATING TO THE DEFINITION

OF QUALIFYING STATE UNDER TITLE XXI OF THE SOCIAL

SECURITY ACT.

Effective as if included in the enactment of Public Law 108–

74, section 2105(g)(2) of the Social Security Act, as added by section

1(b) of such Act, is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘185’’ the first place it appears and inserting

‘‘184’’;

(2) by inserting ‘‘August 1, 1994, or’’ before ‘‘July 1, 1995’’;

and

(3) by inserting before the period at the end the following:

‘‘, or, in the case of a State that had a statewide waiver

in effect under section 1115 with respect to title XIX that

was first implemented on October 1, 1993, had an income

eligibility standard under such waiver for children that was

at least 185 percent of the poverty line and on and after

July 1, 1998, has an income eligibility standard for children

under section 1902(a)(10)(A) or a statewide waiver in effect

under section 1115 with respect to title XIX that is at least

185 percent of the poverty line’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 345.14 Community development illustrative list; Confirmation of eligibility. ( a ) *Illustrative list* — ( 1 ) *Issuing and maintaining the illustrative list.* The Board, the FDIC, and the OCC jointly issue and maintain a publicly available illustrative list of non-exhaustive examples of loans, investments, and services that qualify for community development consideration as provided in § 345.13.
( 2 ) *Modifying the illustrative list.* ( i ) The Board, the FDIC, and the OCC update the illustrative list in paragraph (a)(1) of this section periodically.
( ii ) If the Board, the FDIC, and the OCC determine that a loan or investment is no longer eligible for community development consideration, the owner of the loan or investment at the time of the determination will continue to receive community development consideration for the remaining term or period of the loan or investment. However, these loans or investments will not be considered eligible for community development consideration for any new purchasers of that loan or investment after the agencies make a determination that the loan or investment is no longer eligible for community development consideration.
( b ) *Confirmation of eligibility* — ( 1 ) *Request for confirmation of eligibility.* A bank subject to this part may request that the FDIC confirm that a loan, investment, or service is eligible for community development consideration by submitting a request to, and in a format prescribed by, the FDIC.
( 2 ) *Determination of eligibility.* ( i ) To determine the eligibility of a loan, investment, or service for which a request has been submitted under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the FDIC considers: ( A ) Information that describes and supports the request; and
( B ) Any other information that the FDIC deems relevant.
( ii ) The Board, the FDIC, and the OCC expect and are presumed to jointly determine eligibility of a loan, investment, or service under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section to promote consistency. Before making a determination under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section, the FDIC consults with the Board and OCC regarding the eligibility of a loan, investment, or service.
( iii ) The FDIC may impose limitations or requirements on a determination of the eligibility of a loan, investment, or service to ensure consistency with this part.
( 3 ) *Notification of eligibility.* The FDIC notifies the requestor and the Board and OCC in writing of any determination under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, as well as the rationale for such determination.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3121

To override the income tax treaty with Barbados. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2003

Mr. MCINNIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To override the income tax treaty with Barbados.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OVERRIDE OF INCOME TAX TREATY WITH BAR4 BADOS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Internal Revenue Code of 

6 1986 shall be applied without regard to the Convention 

7 between the United States of America and Barbados for 

8 the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of 

9 Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income signed 

10 on December 31, 1984. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall apply—
2

•HR 3121 IH 

1 (1) in the case of United States taxes withheld 

2 at source, to amounts paid or credited after the date 

3 of the enactment of this Act, and 

4 (2) in the case of other United States taxes, to 

5 taxable years ending after such date.

Æ
§ 23.3 Lease requirements. ( a ) *General requirements.* A national bank may acquire personal property for the purpose of, or in connection with leasing that property, and may engage in activities incidental thereto, if the lease qualifies as a full-payout lease and a net lease.
( b ) *Exceptions* — ( 1 ) *Change in condition.* If, in good faith, a national bank believes that there has been a change in condition that threatens its financial position by increasing its exposure to loss, then the bank may: ( i ) Take reasonable and appropriate action, including the actions specified in § 23.2(f), to salvage or protect the value of the leased property or its interests arising under the lease; and
( ii ) Acquire or perfect title to the leased property pursuant to any existing rights.
( 2 ) *Provisions to protect the bank's interests.* A national bank may include any provision in a lease, or make any additional agreement, to protect its financial position or investment in the event of a change in conditions that would increase its exposure to loss.
( 3 ) *Arranging for services by a third party.* A national bank may arrange for a third party to provide any of the services enumerated in § 23.2(f) to the lessee at the expense of the lessee.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1 Names of Members of the Corporate Assembly The Corporate Assembly currently consists of 18 members. 12 members elected by the
annual general meeting of shareholders: Aase Gudding Gresvig
Westye Høegh
Idar Kreutzer
Sylvi A. Lem
Karen Helene Midelfart
Anne Merete Steensland
Sigurd Støren
Sten-Arthur Sælør
Siri Teigum
Svein Steen Thomassen
Lars Tronsgaard
Svein Aaser 6 members elected by the
employees of Hydros Norwegian companies: Solveig Alne Frøynes
Kjell Kvinge
Jon-Arne Mo
John-Arne Nilsen
Rune Strande
Ingar Aas-Haug Observers:
Sónia F. T. Gjesdal
Sven Edin
Billy Fredagsvik Deputy members for members
elected by the annual general meeting:
Anne-Margrethe Firing
Wolfgang Ruch
Terje Venold Deputy members for members
elected by the employees:
Erna Flattum Berg
Odd Arne Fodnes
Oddny Grebstad
Stig Lima
Line Melkild
Bjørn Nedreaas
§ 308.176 Application for awards. ( a ) *Contents.* An application for an award of fees and expenses under this subpart shall contain: ( 1 ) The name of the applicant and an identification of the proceeding;
( 2 ) For applications filed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 504(a)(1), a showing that the applicant has prevailed, and an identification of each issue with regard to which the applicant believes that the position of the FDIC in the proceeding was not substantially justified;
( 3 ) For applications filed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 504(a)(4), a showing that the demand by the FDIC is substantially in excess of the decision of the administrative law judge and is unreasonable when compared with such decision under the facts and circumstances of the case;
( 4 ) A statement of the amount of fees and expenses for which an award is sought;
( 5 ) For applications filed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 504(a)(4), a statement of the amount of fees and expenses which constitute appropriations paid in advance;
( 6 ) If the applicant is not an individual, a statement of the number of its employees on the date the proceeding was initiated;
( 7 ) A description of any affiliated individuals or entities, as defined in § 308.172(c)(5), or a statement that none exist;
( 8 ) A declaration that the applicant, together with any affiliates, had a net worth not more than the ceiling established for it by § 308.172(b) as of the date the proceeding was initiated;
( 9 ) For applications filed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 504(a)(1), a statement whether the applicant is a small entity as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601; and
( 10 ) Any other matters that the applicant wishes the FDIC to consider in determining whether and in what amount an award should be made.
( b ) *Verification.* The application shall be signed by the applicant or an authorized officer or attorney of the applicant. It shall also contain or be accompanied by a written verification under oath or under penalty of perjury that the information provided in the application and supporting documents is true and correct.
[56 FR 37975, Aug. 9, 1991, as amended at 64 FR 62102, Nov. 16, 1999]
# C_2018088EN.01001601.xml

| 8.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/16

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2018/C 88/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 14 December 2017 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 81383 |
| Decision No | : | 213/17/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Liechtenstein |
| Region | : | Liechtenstein |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Media Support Act 2018-2023 |
| Legal basis | : | The Media Support Act of 21 September 2006 (Medienförderungsgesetz) |
| Type of measure | : | Scheme |
| Objective | : | Culture |
| Form of aid | : | Direct grant |
| Budget | : | CHF 11,04 million, annually CHF 1,84 million |
| Intensity | : | 25 %-40 % |
| Duration | : | 2018-2023 |
| Economic sectors | : | Information and communication |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Medienkommission |
| Äulestrasse 51 |
| Postfach 684 |
| 9490 Vaduz |
| LIECHTENSTEIN |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

14 December 2017

Case No

Case No

:

81383

Decision No

Decision No

:

213/17/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Liechtenstein

Region

Region

:

Liechtenstein

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Media Support Act 2018-2023

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

The Media Support Act of 21 September 2006 (Medienförderungsgesetz)

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Scheme

Objective

Objective

:

Culture

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Direct grant

Budget

Budget

:

CHF 11,04 million, annually CHF 1,84 million

Intensity

Intensity

:

25 %-40 %

Duration

Duration

:

2018-2023

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Information and communication

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Medienkommission

Äulestrasse 51

Postfach 684

9490 Vaduz

LIECHTENSTEIN

Other information

Other information

:

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
steam_record - Re: RRI Energy Brunot Island Power Plant Request 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"Tondo, Rocco" <RTondo@rrienergy.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Tondo, Rocco" <RTondo@rrienergy.com> 

Date: 06/30/2010 02:18PM 

cc: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com>, "Whelan, Kerry M." 

<KWhelan@rrienergy.com>, "Frank, Stephen" <SFrank@rrienergy.com>, 

<DIANE.R.MARTINI@Sargentlundy.com>, "Macey, Francis E" <fmacey@rrienergy.com>, 

"Cunningham, Allison" <ACunningham@rrienergy.com>, "Greek, Matt E." 

<MGreek@rrienergy.com>, "Shearer, Steven B." <SShearer@rrienergy.com>, "Remele, David" 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Tondo, Rocco" <RTondo@rrienergy.com>

Date: 7/2/2010 7:30 PM

Subject: Re: RRI Energy Brunot Island Power Plant Request

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C2E3E6DD... 4/25/2011
<DRemele@rrienergy.com> 

Subject: RRI Energy Brunot Island Power Plant Request 

Dear Ms. Alicea,

Please see the attached request for a due date extension on the Steam Electric Questionnaire from the RRI 

Energy Brunot Island power station. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.

Thank you,

Rocky Tondo

RRI Energy

General Manager

Brunot Island Station

PO Box 99907

Pittsburgh, PA 15233

Cell 330-301-2788

[attachment "Brunot Island EPA Request.pdf" removed by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US] 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C2E3E6DD... 4/25/2011
September 2 0 , 2016

Exemption No. 12403 A
Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 20 15

– 1898

Mr. Jason Abkowitz
Raytheon Company

8350 Alban Road, Suite 700
Springfield,VA 22150

Dear Mr. Abkowitz :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains
the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By letter dated January 15, 2016 , you petiti oned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

on behalf of Raytheon Company (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an amendment to your current exemption . That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and ( c ), 61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a),

61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and
(2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the
petitioner to conduct UAS operations

. You requested an amendment to change the company

name f rom Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems to Raytheon Company

. 1 2

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons
relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a
precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the petitioner

.

1 The petitioner also requested to add aircraft. At this time, the FAA is unable to act on this request. When the
FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the pet itioner.

2 The petitioner also requested relief from the statutory requirement to hold an airman’s certificate. The FAA
does not possess the authority to exempt the petitioner from the statutory requirement to hold an airman
certificate as prescribed in 49 USC § 44711. In Exemption No. 11213 issued to Aeryon Labs, the FAA has
determined that operations can safely be conducted under this exemption by a PIC holding an airline transport,
commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 12403
remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is
granted an amendment to change the operator name

.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Raytheon Company is hereafter referred to as the operator

. All
conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 12403 remain in effect

.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be
grounds for the immediate suspensio n or rescission of this exemption.

T his exemption terminates on August 31, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/ s/

John S. Duncan

Di rector, Flight Standards Service