alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC LAW 110–37—JUNE 18, 2007 121 STAT. 229

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1676:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110–102 (Comm. on Financial Services).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):

Apr. 24, considered and passed House.

May 24, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 110–37

110th Congress

An Act

To reauthorize the program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development

for loan guarantees for Indian housing.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native American Home Ownership Opportunity Act of 2007’’.

SEC. 2. LOAN GUARANTEES FOR NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING.

Section 184(i) of the Housing and Community Development

Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 1715z–13a(i)) is amended as follows:

(1) OUTSTANDING AGGREGATE LIMITATION.—In paragraph

(5)(C), by striking ‘‘fiscal years 1997 through 2007’’ and

inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2008 through 2012’’.

(2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—In paragraph (7),

by striking ‘‘fiscal years 1997 through 2007’’ and inserting

‘‘fiscal years 2008 through 2012’’.

Approved June 18, 2007.

Native American

Home Ownership

Opportunity Act

of 2007.

12 USC 1701

note.

June 18, 2007

[H.R. 1676]
# C_2004319EN.01007201.xml

| 23.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/72

---

Action brought on 1 September 2004 by the Kingdom of Norway against the EFTA Surveillance Authority

(Case E-7/04)

(2004/C 319/14)

An action against the EFTA Surveillance Authority was brought before the EFTA Court on 1 September 2004 by the Kingdom of Norway, represented by Ketil Bøe Moen, assistant advocate, Office of the Attorney General (Civil Affairs), and Ingeborg Djupvik, Advisor, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, acting as agents, c/o The Attorney General (Civil Affairs), Oslo.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | Annul the EFTA Surveillance Authority's Decision 148/04/COL dated 30 June 2004; and |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annul the EFTA Surveillance Authority's Decision 148/04/COL dated 30 June 2004; and

| 2. | Order the EFTA Surveillance Authority to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the EFTA Surveillance Authority to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:

| — | EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision 148/04/COL of 30 June 2004 (the ‘Decision’) concerns environmental tax measures in Norway. |
| --- | --- |

—

EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision 148/04/COL of 30 June 2004 (the ‘Decision’) concerns environmental tax measures in Norway.

| — | In the Decision, the EFTA Surveillance Authority found, inter alia, that four Norwegian tax measures constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) EEA. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the Decision, the EFTA Surveillance Authority found, inter alia, that four Norwegian tax measures constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) EEA.

inter alia

| — | In the Decision, the EFTA Surveillance Authority ordered recovery of the aid constituted by two of these tax measures, based on the premise that the alleged aid schemes became new aid as from 1 January 2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the Decision, the EFTA Surveillance Authority ordered recovery of the aid constituted by two of these tax measures, based on the premise that the alleged aid schemes became new aid as from 1 January 2002.

| — | The EFTA Surveillance Authority has violated Article 61(1) EEA. |
| --- | --- |

—

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has violated Article 61(1) EEA.

| — | The relevant tax measures are not new aid. |
| --- | --- |

—

The relevant tax measures are not new aid.

| — | There is no legal basis for recovery of the alleged aid from the applicants. |
| --- | --- |

—

There is no legal basis for recovery of the alleged aid from the applicants.

---
#### Alfred L. Holihan et el., Plaintiffs, *v.*The City of New York, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Trial Term,

December, 1900.)

Interest — Does not run against a municipal corporation upon an accrued debt until demand.

Where a debt has accrued against a municipal corporation, interest does not begin to run upon it until payment has been demanded of the corporation.

Motion to correct judgment as to allowance of interest or claim sued upon.

John Whalen, Corporation Counsel, and George O’Reilly, for motion.

Black, Olcott, Gruber & Bonynge, opposed.

McAdam, J.

On November 14, 1900, the plaintiffs entered judgment against the defendant for the sum of $936.83, with interest and costs, in an action for goods sold and delivered. Interest was calculated from January 18, 1899, the date of the last delivery of the goods, although no demand was made upon the defendant’s comptroller until January 18, 1900. Defendant contends that the interest should have been calculated from the date of demand, and moves to amend the judgment by deducting from the amount thereof the difference between the interest for the two periods. As to the payment of interest on accrued debts, the authorities apply a different rule to the case of a municipality from that which is applicable where the debtor is a private person. The individual is bound to seek his creditor and pay the debt when it becomes due, whereas a municipal corporation may require a demand before subjecting itself to the burden of interest. Paul v. Mayor, 7 Daly, 144; Donnelly v. City of Brooklyn, 7 N. Y. Supp. 49, 50; affd., 121 N. Y. 9; Taylor v. Mayor, 67 id. 87; People v. Canal Comrs., 5 Den. 404; Matter of College Place, N. Y. L. J., May 7, 1895; Matter of College Place *&*Greenwich Street, id. April 16, 1895. Motion granted.

Motion granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,917
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                       825
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         597,110
<DEPRECIATION>                                 272,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 740,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,519
<BONDS>                                        911,221
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   740,358
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               255,886
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  240,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,328)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,714
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (62,859)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,021)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (60,838)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (60,838)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
08/05/201 0 10:5 2 FA X 202493514 2 FA A + DM S @|001/00 1 

# uv n

P/MNTIM C , W» l 1 ( UVkHlNl j i>>lClAl . l'.niTINC,< i I..M.I . r,r-;\f t BrillmrxM't

t Rou d nrmswn , 'rcxu s 7704 1 I'hone : (713 ) 856.S75 7 i-'uA-;f7i3)er,<.">.8iH<'>

Hearin g Docke t Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbur Wright Buildin g ~ Suite 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 .•f..^ ; y^- ^ ..- ^ ^- aw ^ (y?r-» ^ ^.'-- ^ 

### >^h B 1 ? 

# '^-•Amn o i^^M ^ 

# 0PiDSyJm2./3i^i'^-^ O

LM l Paintin g i s requesrin g t o withdraw our reques t fo r ahearing . LMI i s sendin g acop y thi s letter bot ht o th e FA A attorne y wh o signe dth e Notic e an dt o th e Hearin g Docket . Signal Name : /yf^/^^ . ^,.p i Address : ^'^^>' ^ B" > i^r^yH'^C . "^pA d Telephone : "?/J '^^^-g^l--V 7 Date : J - • K.o - 1 0 Cas e No : .^^^^ 1 S w IdOJ . O t Tax ID Number ; 7( p ^SrgV'^ V
Via Email to Michelle Clery at mclery@prosysis.com





March 18, 2010





Prosys Information Systems, Inc.


4900 Avalon Ridge Parkway


Norcross, GA 30071





New Prosys Corp.


4900 Avalon Ridge Parkway


Norcross, GA 30071





RE: Notice of Default and Waiver





Dear Ms. Clery





Reference is made to that certain Agreement for Wholesale Financing by and between ProSys Information Systems, Inc. and New ProSys Corp. (individually and collectively, "Dealer" and GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation ("CDF'') dated as of October 14, 2005 and that certain Business Financing Agreement by and between Dealer and CDF dated as of October 14, 2005, and all amendments, program letters, agreements and other documents executed in connection therewith (collectively, the "Agreement").  Any guarantor of Dealer's obligations under the Agreement is hereby notified of the matters contained herein and any demand made upon Dealer hereunder is likewise made upon any such guarantor.





CDF hereby notifies you that Dealer is in breach of the Agreement due to the following events: (i) Dealer has failed to maintain a Tangible Net Worth and Subordinated Debt in the combined amount of not less than $9,000,000.00, pursuant to Dealer's financial statement for the period ending on December 31, 2009, Dealer's actual Tangible Net Worth and Subordinated Debt for that period was equal to ($5,100,000.00); and (ii) there has been a Default or an Event of Default by Parent under the Parent Credit Agreement, pursuant to Parent's financial statements for the periods ending on January 31, 2010, and February 28, 2010.  Parent's Latin America subsidiary transferred cash in excess of the amount allowed under the Parent Credit Agreement (the "Existing Defaults''). Such violations of the terms of the Agreement constitute Defaults thereunder.





As a result of Dealer being fully compliant with the covenant requirements as of the date of this letter, CDF will waive its rights and remedies under the Agreement and/or applicable law with respect to the Existing Defaults conditioned upon (i) Dealer's payment of a waiver fee in an amount acceptable to CDF, (ii) the accuracy of the financial statements submitted by Dealer; and (iii) the existence of no other Default at any time.  Such waiver does not apply to any other Default.





Should you have any questions relating to the above described Existing Defaults, or the requirements of your future performance under the Agreement, please contact the undersigned at 770-850'4009 at your earliest convenience.





Sincerely,





GE COMMERCIAL DISTRIBUTION FINANCE CORPORATION





By:
/s/ Scott HuntScott HuntPortfolio Manager





Cc:
David J. LynchRon Usselmankrzasa@prosysis.combmeyer@bellmicro.comahughes@bellmicro.com
#### § 335.501 Tender offers.

The provisions of the applicable and currently effective SEC regulations under sections 14(d), 14(e), and 14(f) of the Exchange Act shall be followed as codified at 17 CFR part 240.

[75 FR 73950, Nov. 30, 2010]
Exhibit 4.83


 


Loan Agreement


 


Contract No. :2014 JIYINZUIQUANDAIZI NO.14100380


 


Borrower : Shijie
Kaiyuan Auto Trading Group Co., Ltd.


 


Lender : CITIC
Shijiazhuang Branch


 


Signing Date : June 27, 2014


 


Loan Amount
: RMB60,000,000


 


Length of maturity
: From June 27, 2014 to June 27, 2015


 


Use of Loan
: Vehicle Purchase


 


Loan Interest : 6.60%


 


	Debt Note:	Debt note is one of the part of the contract, not specified in the contract or records do not match the loan amount, date of draft, repayment date stated on the debt note, the loan documents shall prevail. 


There are three
Debt Note of the contract:


 


	 	1.	Date of Draft : June 27, 2014
	 	 	Draft Amount: RMB60,000,000


 


Withdrawal Amount
: RMB60,000,000


 


Payment Method : The principal shall be fully repaid with interest
at the maturity date of the loan.


 


Repayment Date
:


 


Loan Guarantee : Guaranty of Pledge, Guaranty
of Guarantee


 


- Hebei Chuanglian Finance Leasing Co., Ltd entered into The Maximum
Pledge Contract with the lender, with the contract no. 2014 JIYINZUIQUANDAIZI NO.14140225


 


- LI YONG HUI entered into The Maximum Guarantee


Contract with the lender, with the contract no. 2014 JIYINZUIQUANDAIZI
NO.14120745
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThermal aging effects in refractory metal alloysThe alloys of niobium and tantalum are attractive from a strength and compatibility viewpoint for high operating temperatures required in materials for fuel cladding, liquid metal transfer, and heat pipe applications in space power systems that will supply from 100 kWe to multi-megawatts for advanced space systems. To meet the system requirements, operating temperatures ranging from 1100 to 1600 K have been proposed. Expected lives of these space power systems are from 7 to 10 yr. A program is conducted at NASA Lewis to determine the effects of long-term, high-temperature exposure on the microstructural stability of several commercial tantalum and niobium alloys. Variables studied in the investigation include alloy composition, pre-age annealing temperature, aging time, temperature, and environment (lithium or vacuum), welding, and hydrogen doping. Alloys are investigated by means of cryogenic bend tests and tensile tests. Results show that the combination of tungsten and hafnium or zirconium found in commercial alloys such as T-111 and Cb-752 can lead to aging embrittlement and increased susceptibility to hydrogen embrittlement of ternary and more complex alloys. Modification of alloy composition helps to eliminate the embrittlement problem.Document ID19860006864Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsStephens, J. R.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1986Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-87210E-2869NAS 1.15:87210Meeting InformationMeeting: Symposium on Space Nuclear Power SystemsLocation: Albuquerque, NMCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 13, 1986End Date: January 15, 1986Sponsors:American Nuclear SocietyAccession Number86N16334Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860006864.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EX-10.1



 EXHIBIT 10.1 

Trimble Navigation Limited 

Board of Directors Compensation Policy 

(effective as of May 7, 2015) 
 The following
is a schedule of the elements of compensation and expense reimbursement for nonemployee members of the Trimble board of directors, effective as of May 7, 2015. 
  

	 	•	 	An annual equity grant in the form of Restricted Stock Units (to be determined based upon a target dollar amount of $277,000 divided by the fair market value of a share of Trimble common stock on the date of grant)
under the Trimble Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Plan upon election or re-election by the shareholders at Trimble’s Annual Shareholders’ Meeting. The target dollar amount may be revised based upon appropriate compensation benchmarks
presented to and approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors. 

  

	 	•	 	If a director is appointed or elected to the board of directors at a time other than the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting, an initial equity grant equivalent to the annual equity grant as determined above, pro-rated
based upon the number of months of service since the last Annual Shareholders’ Meeting divided by 12. 

  

	 	•	 	Equity grants are at fair market value on the date of grant and will vest after 1 year. If a board member resigns or voluntarily terminates service as a board member, any unvested equity grant shall vest at such time on
a pro-rata basis based upon the number of months of service since the last Annual Shareholders Meeting divided by 12. 

  

	 	•	 	An annual cash retainer of $60,000, payable in quarterly installments, commencing with the company’s third fiscal quarter. 

  

	 	•	 	Non-employee directors will be reimbursed for local travel expenses or paid a travel allowance based on the distance to the meeting, and reimbursed for other necessary business expenses incurred in the performance of
their services as directors of Trimble.
```

EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eldorado Artesian Springs,  Inc.
     (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
     with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
     "Report")  I,  Douglas  Larson,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,
     certify, pursuant to 18 USC SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Douglas Larson
------------------
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 16, 2004
```
```

[House Report 106-618]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-618

======================================================================

 
  PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 4425, THE FY 2001 MILITARY 
                    CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS BILL

                                _______
                                

May 15, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 502]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 502, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 4425, 
the FY 2001 Military Construction Appropriations Bill, under an 
open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate divided 
equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Appropriations.
    The rule waives clause 4(c) of rule XIII (requiring the 
three-day availability of printed hearings on a general 
appropriations bill) against consideration of the bill and 
waives clause 2 of rule XXI (prohibiting unauthorized or 
legislative provisions in an appropriations bill) against 
provisions in the bill. The waiver of clause 4(c) of rule XIII 
is necessary because the printed hearings are not yet 
available, and the bill may be considered as early as Tuesday, 
May 16. The waiver of clause 2 of rule XXI is necessary because 
the FY 2001 Defense Authorization bill has not been enacted. 
The waiver is also necessary because the bill contains several 
legislative provisions which are enumerated in the bill report. 
The rule also provides that the bill shall be open for 
amendment by paragraph.
    Members who have pre-printed their amendments in the Record 
prior to their consideration will be given priority in 
recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise consistent 
with House rules. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole 
may postpone votes during consideration of the bill, and reduce 
voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if the vote 
follows a fifteen minute vote. Also, the rule provides for one 
motion to recommit, with or without instructions.
    Finally, the rule provides that, for purposes of 
enforcement of the Congressional Budget Act, the appropriate 
levels of new budget authority and total budget outlays shall 
be those reflected in the table entitled ``Conference Report 
Fiscal Year 2001 Budget Resolution Total Spending and 
Revenues'' in House Report 106-577.

                                  

```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 25, 2011 

y0418 

Order 

 

April 25, 2011 

142452 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142452 

 COA: 296999 

Allegan CC: 08-016009-FC 

RANDAL SCOTT CZERKIES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 7, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 ZAHRA, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
#### § 347.203 Deposit insurance required for all branches of foreign banks engaged in domestic retail deposit activity in the same State.

The FDIC will not insure deposits in any branch of a foreign bank unless the foreign bank agrees that every branch established or operated by the foreign bank in the same state that engages in domestic retail deposit activity will be an insured branch.