alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 303.45 Special provisions. ( a ) *Emergency or disaster events.* ( 1 ) In the case of an emergency or disaster at a main office or a branch which requires that an office be immediately relocated to a temporary location, applicants shall notify the appropriate FDIC office within 3 days of such temporary relocation.
( 2 ) Within 10 days of the temporary relocation resulting from an emergency or disaster, the bank shall submit a written application to the appropriate FDIC office, that identifies the nature of the emergency or disaster, specifies the location of the temporary branch, and provides an estimate of the duration the bank plans to operate the temporary branch.
( 3 ) As part of the review process, the FDIC will determine on a case by case basis whether additional information is necessary and may waive public notice requirements.
( b ) *Redesignation of main office and existing branch.* In cases where an applicant desires to redesignate its main office as a branch and redesignate an existing branch as the main office, a single application shall be submitted. The FDIC may waive the public notice requirements in instances where an application presents no significant or novel policy, supervisory, CRA, compliance or legal concerns. A waiver will be granted only to a redesignation within the applicant's home state.
( c ) *Expiration of approval.* Approval of an application expires if within 18 months after the approval date a branch has not commenced business or a relocation has not been completed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

s0831 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

138617 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138617 

 COA: 289614 

Wayne CC: 96-001612 

CELSO ECHAVARRIA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 18, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsVariables controlling fatigue crack growth of short cracksA study was conducted to evaluate the roles of crack closure and microstructure in the fatigue growth of short cracks. Testing was performed at R ratios of 0.1, 0.5, and 0.7. At all R ratios short cracks exhibited accelerated growth rates in comparison to long cracks. It was concluded that crack closure could not entirely account for the accelerated growth rates of short cracks. The accelerated growth rates occurred over crack lengths on the order of grain size, suggesting a strong influence of microstructure. A significant effect of grain boundaries and inclusions on short crack FCG behavior was observed. For very short crack lengths, fatigue growth rates do not appear to be a function of either delta K or R ratio.Document ID19860012190Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsTelesman, J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Fisher, D. M.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Holka, D.*(Michigan Technological Univ. Houghton, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1985Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:87208NASA-TM-87208E-2865Meeting InformationMeeting: International Conference on Fatigue, Corrosion Cracking, Fracture Mechanics, and Failure AnalysisLocation: Salt Lake City, UTCountry: United StatesStart Date: December 2, 1985End Date: December 6, 1985Sponsors:American Society for MetalsAccession Number86N21661Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-33-7CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860012190.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2021495EN.01000401.xml

| 9.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 495/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 495/4

---

EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 August 2021

(Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of ESA’s Decision No 195/04/COL 14 July 2004 (1))

(2021/C 495/03)

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines as amended by ESA’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To obtain the applicable reference rates, appropriate margins shall be added to the base rate in accordance with the State Aid Guidelines.

Base rates have been determined as follows:

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.8.2021 – | 1,50 | -0,61 | 0,26 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.8.2021 –

1,50

-0,61

0,26

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and EEA Supplement to the OJ No. 26/2006, 25 May 2006, p. 1.

---
MASTER AND SERVANT.

[Lucas Circuit Court,

January Term, 1893.]

Bentley, Haynes and Scribner, JJ.

#### L. S. & M. S. Ry. Co. v. Charles Raitz.

Injury prom Defective Appliances.

Where a leaky valve in a locomotive caused it to start and injure an employee cleaning out the ashes, the company is liable.

Scribner, J.

On April 2, 1890, Raitz was an employee of the railway company and his duty was to clean the ash pan of locomotives when they had come in from a run on the road. On that day he went under an engine standing over the ash pit, for that purpose. The hostler on the engine at Ratiz’s request let steam into the cylinders and caused the engine to move about two feet backward so as to get it in the proper place to clean the ashes out, and then closed the throttle, applied the steam brakes and stopped the engine, and then let off the brakes and set the lever on the center, the cylinder cocks being open. Raitz then put his hand out from under the engine and just back of the wheel of the forward trucks in order to get the hose lying there to wet the ashes down, when the engine started and the truck wheel ran over his hand and cut it off. He claims that the valves of the engine were leaky and that in consequence of that the engine suddenly moved as aforesaid. Proof was given tending to show that this movement of the engine occurred five or six minutes after the steam had been shut off and the brakes *19released, and that it would not have occurred unless the valves were defective. His evidence also tended to show that about four year&before, in 1886, at Elyria, the same engine had “run away’’ while the engineer and fireman were away from it for a few minutes, and smashed its pilot, and that it had been taken to the shop for repairs, and that again in 1888, about two years before the accident to Raitz, the engine had been sent to the repair shop on account of its leaky throttle valve and repaired. It was claimed by the company that the engine was in perfect order and condition when Raitz was hurt, but that he put his hand out for the hose immediately after the brakes were let oil and that the unexpanded steam in the pipes moved the engine a few feet, and that such a movement is usual, and does not indicate any defect in the engine or the valves of the engine. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of Raitz, and the court of common pleas, having refused a new trial, rendered a judgment upon the verdict and this judgment is now affirmed by the circuit court in a majority opinion.

The coincidence is noted that this accident occurred in the early morning of the very day that the law of 1890 was passed, providing in substance, that where an injury occurs to an employee of a railroad company by reason of defective machinery, the company shall be presumed to have had notice of the defect and to have been negligent.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-75811) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option Plan, Amended
and Restated 1988 Stock Option Plan, and Amended and Restated 1992 Stock
Option Plan of Thomas Group, Inc. of our report dated March 8, 2000, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Thomas Group, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1999.

                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 27, 2000
§ 347.207 Disclosure of supervisory information to foreign supervisors. ( a ) *Disclosure by the FDIC.* The FDIC may disclose information obtained in the course of exercising its supervisory or examination authority to a foreign bank regulatory or supervisory authority, if the FDIC determines that disclosure is appropriate for bank supervisory or regulatory purposes and will not prejudice the interests of the United States.
( b ) *Confidentiality.* Before making any disclosure of information pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the FDIC will obtain, to the extent necessary, the agreement of the foreign bank regulatory or supervisory authority to maintain the confidentiality of such information to the extent possible under applicable law. The disclosure or transfer of information to a foreign bank regulatory or supervisory authority under this section will not waive any privilege applicable to the information that is disclosed or transferred.
EXHIBIT 31.2



              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, J. Richard George, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  annual  report on Form  10-KSB of Calypte  Biomedical
Corporation;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
         a) designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures,  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
         c)  disclosed  in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the  registrant's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
function):
         a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and
         b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls; and




Date: March 29, 2004

/s/ J. Richard George
----------------------
J. Richard George
President and Chief Executive Officer


                                      II-2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      971,422
<SECURITIES>                              1,061,556
<RECEIVABLES>                                74,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          2,136,043
<PP&E>                                       31,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           10,796,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       224,974
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      3,202
<OTHER-SE>                               10,571,755
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             10,796,729
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               179,993
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (871,113)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             691,120
<INCOME-TAX>                                207,336
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         483,784
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                483,784
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.15


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 58 (Friday, March 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7058]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Public Notice for Waiver of Aeronautical Land-Use Assurance; Marv 
Skie-Lincoln County Airport; Tea, SD

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent of waiver with respect to land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a 
proposal to authorize the release of 1.109 acres of the airport 
property at the Marv Skie-Lincoln County Airport, Tea, South Dakota. 
The proposal consists of the trade of unimproved land on the east side 
of the airport owned by the County of Lincoln for an equal parcel of 
land located on the west side of the airport.
    The acreage being released is not needed for aeronautical use as 
currently identified on the Airport Layout Plan. There are no impacts 
to the airport by allowing the County to trade properties. Approval 
does not constitute a commitment by the FAA to financially assist in 
the disposal of the airport property nor a determination of eligibility 
for grant-in-aid funding from the FAA.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 25, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Mr. David P. Anderson, Program Manager, Bismarck Airports 
District Office, 2301 University Drive, Building 23B, Bismarck, North 
Dakota, 58504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David P. Anderson, Program 
Manager, Bismarck Airports District Office, 2301 University Drive, 
Building 23B, Bismarck, North Dakota. Telephone Number (701) 323-7380/
FAX Number (701) 323-7399. Documents reflecting this FAA action may be 
reviewed at this same location or at the Lincoln County States 
Attorneys Office, 104 North Main Street, Suite 200, Canton, South 
Dakota.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Following is a description of the subject 
airport property to be released at the Marv Skie-Lincoln County 
Airport.
    This property for release is for a land trade at the Marv Skie-
Lincoln County Airport owned by the County of Lincoln, South Dakota. 
The property for release was originally acquired under Airport 
Improvement Program grant number 3-46-0078-001-1988. This 1.109 acres 
is located in Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30, 
Township 100 North, Range 50 West of the 5th Principle Meridian.
    Said parcel subject to all easements, restrictions, and 
reservations of record.

    Issued in Bismarck, North Dakota, on February 28, 2011.
Thomas T. Schauer,
Manager, Bismarck Airports District Office, FAA, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. 2011-7058 Filed 3-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### § 343.60 Qualification and licensing requirements for insurance sales personnel.

An institution may not permit any person to sell or offer for sale any insurance product or annuity in any part of its office or on its behalf, unless the person is at all times appropriately qualified and licensed under applicable State insurance licensing standards with regard to the specific products being sold or recommended.
§ 338.6 Definitions applicable to this subpart. For purposes of this subpart— ( a ) *Bank* means an insured State nonmember bank as defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1813.
( b ) *Controlled entity* means a corporation, partnership, association, or other business entity with respect to which a bank possesses, directly or indirectly, the power to direct or cause the direction of management and policies, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract, or otherwise.
( c ) *FDIC-supervised institution* means either a bank or a State savings association.
( d ) *State savings association* has the same meaning as in section 3(b)(3) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1813(b)(3).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             113,502,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 13,696,799
<COMMON>                                        11,969
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,444,371)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               113,502,026
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,431,318
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (28,925,731)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              3,455,551
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (32,797,411)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.89)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Oct-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Nov-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jul-31-1998
<CASH>                                         3,845
<SECURITIES>                                   13,295
<RECEIVABLES>                                  42,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,318
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               85,144
<PP&E>                                         5,225
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22,291
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          8
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     84,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,585
<SALES>                                        148,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,309
<CGS>                                          122,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               23,787
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,082
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,249
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            833
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   833
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .10
        


</TABLE>