alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012384EN.01001201.xml

| 13.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/12

---

The EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for three EFTA States applicable as from 1 August 2012

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004
   (1)
  )

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004

1

)

2012/C 384/10

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of the Authority’s State aid Guidelines as amended by the Authority’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008 (2). To get the applicable reference rate, appropriate margins have to be added in accordance with the State aid Guidelines. For the discount rate this means that the appropriate margin of 100 basis points has to be added to the base rate. The recovery rate will also normally be calculated by adding 100 basis points to the base rate as foreseen in the Authority’s Decision No 789/08/COL of 17 December 2008 (3) amending the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (4).

2

3

4

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.1.2012-31.5.2012 | 4,70 | 0,31 | 3,57 |
| 1.6.2012-31.7.2012 | 4,70 | 0,38 | 3,57 |
| 1.8.2012- | 5,90 | 0,38 | 3,57 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.1.2012-31.5.2012

4,70

0,31

3,57

1.6.2012-31.7.2012

4,70

0,38

3,57

1.8.2012-

5,90

0,38

3,57

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and in the EEA Supplement No 26, 25.5.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 105, 21.4.2011, p. 32 and in the EEA Supplement No 23, 21.4.2011, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 340, 22.12.2010, p. 1 and in the EEA Supplement No 72, 22.12.2010, p. 1.

3

(4)  See consolidated version on: http://www.eftasurv.int/media/decisions/195-04-COL.pdf

4

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Morlex, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald Barrick,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Donald
                BarrickDonald
                    Barrick
                  Principal
                    Executive Officer
                  Principal
                    Financial Officer
                  November
                    1, 2006
May 20, 2015 

 

Rubin Garcia 

2780 Northeast 183 St #191 

Aventura, FL 33160 

Dear Mr. Rubin Garcia: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your March 25th, 2015 exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-0764), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
Record of Discussion Docket No. FAA-20 12-0603 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NE-17-AD

With whom outside the FAA has this action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

### James Meade 8/27112 Other. List below. Other /Additional Information: 

### Responded to email comment to FR.

9
§ 252.160 Applicability. ( a ) *General applicability.* This subpart applies to a U.S. intermediate holding company that is required to be established pursuant to § 252.153 and is controlled by a global systemically important foreign banking organization (Covered IHC).
( b ) *Initial applicability.* A Covered IHC is subject to the requirements of §§ 252.162, 252.163, 252.165, 252.166, and 252.167 beginning on the later of: ( 1 ) January 1, 2019; and
( 2 ) 1095 days (three years) after the later of the date on which: ( i ) The U.S. non-branch assets of the global systemically important foreign banking organization that controls the Covered IHC equaled or exceeded $50 billion; and
( ii ) The foreign banking organization that controls the Covered IHC became a global systemically important foreign banking organization.
( c ) *Applicability of § 252.164 .* Section 252.164 applies to a global systemically important foreign banking organization with U.S. non-branch assets that equal or exceed $50 billion.
[82 FR 8311, Jan. 24, 2017, as amended at 86 FR 738, Jan. 6, 2021]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3209

To amend the Reclamation Project Authorization Act of 1972 to clarify 

the acreage for which the North Loup division is authorized to provide 

irrigation water under the Missouri River Basin project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2003

Mr. OSBORNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To amend the Reclamation Project Authorization Act of 

1972 to clarify the acreage for which the North Loup 

division is authorized to provide irrigation water under 

the Missouri River Basin project.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF ACREAGE FOR IRRIGATION 

4 WATER. 

5 Section 501 of the Reclamation Project Authorization 

6 Act of 1972 (43 U.S.C. 615dddd) is amended by striking 
2

•HR 3209 IH 

1 ‘‘fifty-three thousand acres’’ and inserting ‘‘approximately 

2 53,000 acres’’.

Æ
**
**Exhibit 13.1**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Natuzzi S.p.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-Ffairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
Dated: April 30, 2019 /s/ Pasquale Natuzzi Pasquale Natuzzi Chief Executive OfficerDated: April 30, 2019 /s/ Vittorio Notarpietro Vittorio Notarpietro Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Natuzzi S.p.A.and will be retained by Natuzzi S.p.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
#### HYDE V. McGHEE.

(Decided May 22, 1913.)

Appeal from Lauderdale Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. C. P. Almon.

A. A. Williams, for appellant. Mitchell & Hughston, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000793981
<NAME> WEALTH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         11375
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11375)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
§ 264b.8 Disposition or retention of gifts and decorations deposited with the Office of the Secretary. ( a ) The Office of the Secretary may dispose of gifts and decorations deposited under §§ 264b.6(a) and 264b.7(b) by returning them to the donors or by handling them in accordance with instructions from the General Services Administration under applicable law.
( b ) The Office of the Secretary may approve and retain gifts and decorations deposited under §§ 264b.6(a) and 264b.7(b) for official use. The Office of the Secretary must dispose of a gift within 30 days of the termination of its official use in accordance with instructions from the General Services Administration under applicable law.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3033

To extend to Nepal certain preferential treatment with respect to apparel 

articles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 5, 2003

Mr. WALSH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To extend to Nepal certain preferential treatment with 

respect to apparel articles.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN TEXTILES AND AP4 PAREL. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the pref6 erential treatment extended to apparel articles under sec7 tion 112(b)(3)(B) of the African Growth and Opportunity 

8 Act (19 U.S.C. 3721(b)(3)(B)) shall also apply to apparel 

9 articles that are imported directly into the customs terri10 tory of the United States from Nepal in accordance with 
2

•HR 3033 IH 

1 the provisions set forth in such section as if such articles 

2 were articles of a lesser developed beneficiary sub-Saharan 

3 African country, if Nepal has satisfied the requirements 

4 set forth in section 113 of such Act (19 U.S.C. 3722), 

5 except that—

6 (1) any reference in section 112(b) or section 

7 113 of the African Growth and Opportunity Act to 

8 a lesser developed beneficiary sub-Saharan African 

9 country (or countries) shall be treated as a reference 

10 to Nepal; and 

11 (2) such preferential treatment shall apply to 

12 apparel articles imported into the customs territory 

13 of the United States during the period beginning on 

14 October 1, 2003, and ending on September 30, 

15 2005.

Æ
|   |                                                                                                                               |
|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1 | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2016 of Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; |

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
| Dated: | March 24, 2017 |   | /s/ DAVID J. ANDERSON |
|   |   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
1

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting Minutes for the September 5, 2007 Conference Call Between the US

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Vinyl Institute to Discuss Plans

for the Vacated Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production MACT Standard

FROM: Greg Nizich

, U.S. EPA.

TO: Docket No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 200 2

- 0 037

DATE: October 2 , 2007

The EPA held a conference call with the Vinyl Institute (V I) and some member

companies on September 5, 2007 to discuss issues related to the court vacature of the subject

MACT standard

. The following people participated in the call:

Greg Nizich, EPA Frank Borrelli

, V I

KC Hustvedt, EPA Mary Bachynsky, Formosa Corp.

Randy McDonald, EPA Ken Akins, Georgia Gulf C orp.

Marcia Mia, EPA J.C. Walker, Keller and Heckman

Sheila Igoe, EPA Peter de la Cruz, Keller and Heckman

Jason Huckaby, ERG Ray Giovanetti, Oxy Chemicals

The following topics were discussed:

1. The Miscellaneous Organic NESHAP (MON) and the polyvinyl chloride (PVC)

ma nufacturing industry

. 2. Establishment of the MACT floor for processes cited by petitioners on the original PVC

rule

. 3. Variation in product mix and end products amongst the different facilities

. 4. Previous meetings between the VI and state permittin g staff with PVC facilities

. 5. Option of having VI members review our National Emissions Inventory data and fill in

areas where we lack information to properly address petitioner’s issues

.
#### LUIGI MAISTO ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. NICHOLAS MAISTO ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Submitted February 36, 1940 —

Decided April 25, 1940.

For the respondents, *Mario H. Volpe.*

For the appellants, *George Pellettieri.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— Parker, Case, Bodine, Heiiee, Peeskie, Hetfielb, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 11.

*For reversal*— None.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 219 (Monday, November 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70509-70510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29230]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts; Federal Advisory Committee on 
International Exhibitions

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Federal Advisory Committee on International Exhibitions (FACIE) 
will be held on December 7, 2011 in Room 815 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20506 (ending time is 
approximate). This meeting, from 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., is for 
application review and will be closed.
    The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel 
review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial 
assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities 
Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to 
the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of 
February 15, 2011, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant 
to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Further information with reference to these meetings can be 
obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel 
Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or 
call (202) 682-5691.

[[Page 70510]]

    Dated: November 7, 2011.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2011-29230 Filed 11-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00281

- CR

Kevin BALDITT

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Ap pellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR3121 Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The trial court imposed sentence on July 21, 2014 , and appellant did not file a motion for

new trial. Because appellant did not file a timely motion for new trial, the deadline for f iling a notice of appeal was August 20, 2014

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal was

not filed until April 27, 2015, and appellant did not timely file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.3.

We therefore ORDER appellant to file a wri tten response in this court on or before June 11, 2015 showing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Olivo v.

State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (holding that timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke court of appeals ’ jurisdiction). If appellant fails to satisfactorily respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. If a supplemental

clerk ’ s record is required to show jurisdiction, appellant must ask the trial court clerk to prepare one and must notify the clerk of this court that such a request was made. All deadlines in this matter are suspended until further order of the court.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this or der on all counsel and the court

reporter.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of May, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### HOFFMAN V. SAXON.

(Decided April 15, 1913.)

Appeal from Lee Law and Equity Court.

Heard before Hon. Lum Duke.

B. C. Smith, and A. E. Barnett, for appellant. Barnes & Denson, appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
Editorial Note on Part 225
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 225 appear at 69 FR 77618, Dec. 28, 2004.

§ 225.6 Penalties for violations. ( a ) *Criminal and civil penalties.* ( 1 ) Section 8 of the BHC Act provides criminal penalties for willful violation, and civil penalties for violation, by any company or individual, of the BHC Act or any regulation or order issued under it, or for making a false entry in any book, report, or statement of a bank holding company.
( 2 ) Civil money penalty assessments for violations of the BHC Act shall be made in accordance with subpart C of the Board's Rules of Practice for Hearings (12 CFR part 263, subpart C). For any willful violation of the Bank Control Act or any regulation or order issued under it, the Board may assess a civil penalty as provided in 12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(15).
( b ) *Cease-and-desist proceedings.* For any violation of the BHC Act, the Bank Control Act, this regulation, or any order or notice issued thereunder, the Board may institute a cease-and-desist proceeding in accordance with the Financial Institutions Supervisory Act of 1966, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1818(b) *et seq.*).