alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The Matter Of: 

### SERVED: July 1, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

DocketNo. FAA-2014-1116 Pacific International Skydiving Center ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2014WP130012 Respondent

NOTICE OFHEARING Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.205(a)(l) and§ 13.221, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

### 1. Location a. The hearing will be held atthe United States District Court, District ofHawaii, 300 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96850. 1 b. Briefcases, purses, packages, and other items will be subject to search upon entry to the building. All individuals mustpresent a valid government-issued I.D. to enter. 2. Date. a. The hearing will begin on December 13, 2016. b. The courtroom is reserved through December 16, 2016. 3. Time a. The·hearing will begin·at 9:00 a.m. local time and endby 4:00 p.m. each day. b. The parties shall vacate the courthouse by 5:00 p.m. each day.

Attachment: Service List**y~,,___** 

# __ DOUGLAS M. RA 

## wALD A Administrative LawJudge

I As ofthe date ofthis notice, a courtroom has not yet been assigned. Parties should check the Court Calendar on the day ofthe hearing for the exact courtroom or check with the Clerk's Office.

### SERVICE LIST - BY 

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl0002


### ONE COPY Robert L. Feldman, Respondent's Counsel 8900 SW 107th Avenue, Suite 203 Miami, FL 33176 TEL: 305-598-4841 FAX: 305-598-4842 Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7 Federal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region P. 0. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-3454 FAX:310-725-6816 The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (El 1-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-1116 (Civil Penalty Action)

2 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(333-40027) on Form S-8 of Hybrid Networks, Inc., of our report dated
February 16, 2000, relating to the balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and
1999 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period
ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual
report on Form 10-K of Hybrid Networks, Inc.

/s/ HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP

HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP
Certified Public Accountants

Orange, California
June 1, 2001
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
      the


Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002





The
      undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their
      knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six month period ended
      June
      30, 2007 of Naturade, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      and that the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the
      Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.




/s/ Richard
              MunroRichard
                Munro
              *Chief
                Executive Officer*
              September
                11, 2007




/s/ Adam
              MichelinAdam
                Michelin
              *Principal
                Accounting Officer*
              September
                11, 2007






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and it will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.
#### § 269b.450 Submission of hearing officer's report to the panel.

After the close of the hearing, and the receipt of briefs, if any, the hearing officer shall prepare a report and recommendations, containing findings of fact, conclusions of law, including judgments as to the credibility of witnesses where appropriate, and the reasons or basis therefor, and recommendations as to the disposition of the case, and, where appropriate, including the remedial action and notices to be posted. After he has caused his report and recommendations to be served promptly on all parties to the proceeding, he shall transfer the case to the panel including his report and recommendations and the complete record. Such submission shall be made within 20 days after the close of the hearing and the receipt of briefs, if any, unless otherwise extended by the panel. The record shall include the charge, notice of hearing, service sheet, motions, rulings, orders, official transcript of the hearing, stipulations, objections, depositions, documentary evidence, exhibits, and any briefs or other documents submitted to the parties.
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12006E010

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part One - Principles - Article 10***Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0047 - 0047 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0042 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0183 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0009 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available)*

Article 10

Member States shall take all appropriate measures, whether general or particular, to ensure fulfilment of the obligations arising out of this Treaty or resulting from action taken by the institutions of the Community. They shall facilitate the achievement of the Community's tasks.

They shall abstain from any measure which could jeopardise the attainment of the objectives of this Treaty.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 339.8 Determination fees. ( a ) *General.* Notwithstanding any Federal or State law other than the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001-4129), any FDIC-supervised institution, or a servicer acting on its behalf, may charge a reasonable fee for determining whether the building or mobile home securing the loan is located or will be located in a special flood hazard area. A determination fee may also include, but is not limited to, a fee for life-of-loan monitoring.
( b ) *Borrower fee.* The determination fee authorized by paragraph (a) of this section may be charged to the borrower if the determination: ( 1 ) Is made in connection with a making, increasing, extending, or renewing of the loan that is initiated by the borrower;
( 2 ) Reflects the Administrator of FEMA's revision or updating of floodplain areas or flood-risk zones;
( 3 ) Reflects the Administrator of FEMA's publication of a notice or compendium that: ( i ) Affects the area in which the building or mobile home securing the loan is located; or
( ii ) By determination of the Administrator of FEMA, may reasonably require a determination whether the building or mobile home securing the loan is located in a special flood hazard area; or
( 4 ) Results in the purchase of flood insurance coverage by the lender or its servicer on behalf of the borrower under § 339.7.
( c ) *Purchaser or transferee fee.* The determination fee authorized by paragraph (a) of this section may be charged to the purchaser or transferee of a loan in the case of the sale or transfer of the loan.
Exhibit 10.2 - 2015 Q1 10-Q






Exhibit 10.2





May 4, 2015


Dear Eric,
    
The purpose of this letter (this “Letter Agreement”) is to memorialize our mutual understanding related to your service as the Chief Executive Officer of Groupon, Inc. (“Groupon” or the “Company”). 


You will continue to receive the following benefits during your tenure as Chief Executive Officer and/or if you become Chairman of the Board of Directors of Groupon:


		
	•
	Groupon will pay for your administrative assistant or provide you with an annual budget, in an amount to be agreed upon, to pay for the same.




		
	•
	In accordance with Groupon’s policy regarding the use of private aircraft for business travel by executives, the Company will continue to pay or reimburse you (including through any applicable aircraft charter or management company) for the cost of chartering the aircraft leased by you or your affiliated entity for business use by Groupon’s executives or directors. 




You also will receive (i) a base salary of $1.00 per year, (ii) a restricted stock unit award in May 2015 with a grant date fair value of $7.0 million, (iii) a personal security detail or an annual budget, in an amount to be agreed upon but not to exceed $75,000, to pay for the same during your tenure as Chief Executive Officer and/or Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, and (iv) participation in Groupon’s benefit programs and any other compensation mutually agreed to by the parties hereto related to your service.  The terms of the restricted stock unit award are set forth in a restricted stock unit award agreement between you and the Company.  For avoidance of doubt, references herein to service as Chairman shall include service as Executive Chairman.


If this Letter Agreement accurately reflects your understanding as to Groupon’s obligations with respect to the elements described herein for your employment as Chief Executive Officer and/or service as Chairman the Board of Directors, please sign and date one copy of this Letter Agreement in the space provided below and return the same to me for Groupon’s records.


Sincerely,




/s/ Peter Barris
Peter Barris
Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the 
Board of Directors 
Groupon, Inc.


The above terms accurately reflect my understanding as to Groupon’s obligations with respect to the elements described herein for my employment and/or service as Chairman of the Board of Directors.


Accepted by:


_/s/ Eric Lefkofsky___________________________________
Eric Lefkofsky


Agreed and accepted this 4th day of May, 2015
Regulatory );valuation 

Docket No. FAA-2015-2208 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NE-19-AD-AD 

Add tlre war/r hom ~a~, ynrts cosl, emd nuntber of U S segis(ered pr~ oducts !o !he lable Gelow. When pou are 

,Ji»ished click on Ihe "Opda[eTields" Ga[lon 7o rrutontalical7y jill in [he /o/als. 

Update Fields 

Estimated Costs: 

Actiou 

(e.g., Inspectioq 

replacemeut) 

Do not rnelude oncondition eosis here 

Costs per Product (e.g, aireraft, engine, 

ro eller, a liauoe) 

~york-hours 

(NClude 

access, testing, 

audclose-up) 

Labor 

cost 

(®$85/h 

our 

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(Iabor+ 

parts) 

Number of 

O.S. 

Registered 

Prodocts 

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet 

Inspectiou,repair, 

ctc. 

2 ., ~, 15000 

~ ~;~ ni~~ 47 ~ 

~:i~ 

i:i 

~ ... 

~ na 

i ~ 

iu 

~,:" i ,~.: ~. . 

n 

The known number of products in compliance: Nwnbcr 

Total Costs of oomplianoe for U.S. flee[: $712,990 

Costscoveredunderwarranty(ifknown) $Warranta 

Ou-Coudition Costs: ~-J Total cost of com liauce =$ 712,990. for U.S. 0eet 

Action 

(e.g., lnspectioq 

replacemeut) 

~✓ork-hours 

(inolude access, 

testiug, and closeup) 

Laborcost 

(@$85/hour) 

PartsCost CostperProduct 

inspection ~ 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Ose this fleld to exp[arn anything zn the EsHmatedCosts tab[e 

that was assumed or migh[ nat be obvious. This field can also be used to exp(ain warranty costs): 

Execative Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a°significantregolatory actlon"7 ~~No 

YES* 0 NO ® 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regnlatory Policies and Procedares: 

Is the AD significant7 ~./ Na 

YES* O NO ® 

*Explanation: 

Regolatory Fleaibility Ac[: ~ Will the AD have a significant eoonomio impact on a substantial number of small entities9 Explain for 

eithec a Yes or No answec ~~'No 

YES L] NO ® 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could aFFect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only moda of tcaneportation7 ~~~No 

YES* O NO ® 

*Explanation:
Exhibit 23.01

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on
Form S-8 of Hybrid  Networks,  Inc.,  of our  report  dated  January  25,  2002,
relating to the balance  sheets as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related
statements of operations,  stockholders'  equity  (deficit),  and cash flows for
each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2001, which report
appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Hybrid  Networks,
Inc.


/s/ HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP

HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP
Certified Public Accountants

Orange, California
March 19, 2002
### Reg ul atory E va lu ation
D ocket No . F AA- D i re c t ora t e Iden tifi e r: -AD



### Add the work hours, parts cost, and number ofUS. regist ered products to the table belo·w. When you are finished, click on I 

### he "Update F i elds" button to automat i cally fill in the totals. Update Fields 

# I
Estimated Costs : Action Costs per P r oduct (e.g . , aircraft , e n gine, (e.g., Inspection , _ j)rOpeller, appl iance)

Work-hours Labor P at1s Cost Tota l Costs Number of Tota l Cost rep lace m ent) ( includ e cost (labor + 

### u.s . for U . S . Fleet 

### Do not include on condi tion cos ts he re access, testi n g, ( @$ 85 / h parts) Reg i s t ered and c lo se -up ) our) P r oducts 

### Inspect io n. repa ir . 8.6 430 etc.

T h e known number of p rod uc ts in compliance: 

### Number Tota l Costs of complia nce for U . S. fleet: $ 314,330 0 Costs cove red under wan·anty 

### Ufknown) $ Wa rrant) O n - Co ndit ion Costs:

# ~ Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cos t per Product Action (i nclude ac cess , ( @$ 85 / hour) (e.g. , Inspection , test in g, and c lose-

r eplacement) up) None


### ----- 

### - --- ---

### Special considerations for Economic Anal y si s (Use this .fiel d to expla in anyth i ng in th e Es timated Costs table 1ha1 was assumed or m ight not be obvious . Th isfie l d can also be used to expla in warranty cos t s) : 

### E x e cutiv e O r d e r 1 2866: Co u ld t h e A D be conside re d a " s ign i fica n t reg ul a t o r y action " ?- YES* 

### 0 NO 

### IZI *Ex p la nati on : 

### D O T Regulator y Policies and Procedures: I s t he A D s ig ni fica nt ? 

# 0 YES* 

### 0 NO IXl *Ex pl ana ti o n: 

### Re gulatory Flexibility Act: Will t h e AD have a sign i fica n t eco n o m ic im p act o n a s u bsta n tia l n u m b e r of sm all en titi es? Expl a in fo r eit h er a Yes o r No answe r.

# ~ Y ES 

### 0**NO ~**  Explanation: 

### Intrastate Avi a tion in Alaska: T hi s AD could affect int ras ta te avi a tio n in A las k a . I s i t a p p ro pria t e to i nc lu de s p ecific req uir emen t s f o r a ir craft o p erated in Alaska whe re avi a tion mi gh t be t he o n ly m o de o ftrans p o rta tion?

# ~ YES* 0**~** *Exp la natio n :
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

185 

KA 14-00194 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

AMANDA M. HENRY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (LAURA T. BITTNER OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S.

Farkas, J.). rendered July 12, 2013. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her

upon her plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law §

120.05 [2]). The record establishes that defendant knowingly,

voluntarily and intelligently waived her right to appeal (see

generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256), and that valid waiver

encompasses her challenge to the severity of the sentence (see

generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d

733, 737).

Entered: March 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
###### Editorial Note on Part 220

#### Editorial Note:

A copy of each form referred to in this part is filed as a part of the original document. Copies are available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any Federal Reserve Bank.

#### § 220.102 [Reserved]
§ 239.13 Charters. ( a ) *Charters.* The charter of a mutual holding company shall be in the form set forth in appendix A of this part and may be amended pursuant to this paragraph. The Board may amend the form of charter set forth in appendix A to this part.
( b ) *Corporate title.* The corporate title of each mutual holding company shall include the term “mutual” or the abbreviation “M.H.C.”
( c ) *Availability of charter.* A mutual holding company shall make available to its members at all times in the offices of each subsidiary savings association from which the mutual holding company draws members a true copy of its charter, including any amendments, and shall deliver such a copy to any member upon request.
§ 351.16 Ownership of Interests in and Sponsorship of Issuers of Certain Collateralized Debt Obligations Backed by Trust-Preferred Securities. ( a ) The prohibition contained in § 351.10(a)(1) does not apply to the ownership by a banking entity of an interest in, or sponsorship of, any issuer if: ( 1 ) The issuer was established, and the interest was issued, before May 19, 2010;
( 2 ) The banking entity reasonably believes that the offering proceeds received by the issuer were invested primarily in Qualifying TruPS Collateral; and
( 3 ) The banking entity acquired such interest on or before December 10, 2013 (or acquired such interest in connection with a merger with or acquisition of a banking entity that acquired the interest on or before December 10, 2013).
( b ) For purposes of this § 351.16, *Qualifying TruPS Collateral* shall mean any trust preferred security or subordinated debt instrument issued prior to May 19, 2010 by a depository institution holding company that, as of the end of any reporting period within 12 months immediately preceding the issuance of such trust preferred security or subordinated debt instrument, had total consolidated assets of less than $15,000,000,000 or issued prior to May 19, 2010 by a mutual holding company.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(3) of this section, a banking entity may act as a market maker with respect to the interests of an issuer described in paragraph (a) of this section in accordance with the applicable provisions of §§ 351.4 and 351.11.
( d ) Without limiting the applicability of paragraph (a) of this section, the Board, the FDIC and the OCC will make public a non-exclusive list of issuers that meet the requirements of paragraph (a). A banking entity may rely on the list published by the Board, the FDIC and the OCC.
[79 FR 5228, Jan. 31, 2014]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 198 (Thursday, October 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) Meeting of the 
ACRS Subcommittee; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS U.S. Evolutionary Power Reactor (EPR) Subcommittee will 
hold a meeting on November 3, 2009, 11545 Rockville Pike, T2-B3, 
Rockville, Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Tuesday, November 3, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.

    The Subcommittee will review selected chapters of the Safety 
Evaluation with Open Items concerning the U.S. EPR Design Certification 
Application. The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold 
discussions with representatives of AREVA, the NRC staff and other 
interested persons regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will gather 
information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed 
positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full 
Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. 
Derek Widmayer (Telephone 301-415-7366, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2367465146480d744a474e425a4651634d51400d444c55"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d591b0a7b0befb82bcb1b8b4acb0a795bba7b6fbb2baa3">[email protected]</span></a>) 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made. Thirty-five hard copies of each presentation 
or handout should be provided to the Designated Federal Official 30 
minutes before the meeting. In addition, one electronic copy of each 
presentation should be e-mailed to the Designated Federal Official 1 
day before the meeting. If an electronic copy cannot be provided within 
this timeframe, presenters should provide the Designated Federal 
Official with a CD containing each presentation at least 30 minutes 
before the meeting. Electronic recordings will be permitted. Detailed 
procedures for the conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were 
published in the Federal Register on October 6, 2008 (73 FR 58268-
58269).
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 8 a.m. and 5:15 p.m. 
(ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting 
to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

    Dated: October 8, 2009.
Antonio Dias,
Chief, Reactor Safety Branch B, Advisory Committee on Reactor 
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E9-24781 Filed 10-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 313.160 Treasury notification. ( a ) In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3716, the FDIC as a creditor agency must notify the Secretary of the Treasury of all debts that are delinquent (over 180 days past due), as defined in the FCCS, to enable the Secretary to seek collection by centralized administrative offset. This includes debts the FDIC seeks to recover from the pay account of an employee of another agency by means of salary offset.
( b ) For purposes of centralized administrative offset, a claim or debt is not delinquent if: ( 1 ) It is in litigation or foreclosure;
( 2 ) It will be disposed of under an asset sale program within one year after becoming eligible for sale;
( 3 ) It has been referred to a private collection contractor for collection;
( 4 ) It has been referred to a debt collection center;
( 5 ) It will be collected under internal offset, if such offset is sufficient to collect the claim within three years after the date the debt or claim is first delinquent; and
( 6 ) It is within a specific class of claims or debts which the Secretary of the Treasury has determined to be exempt, at the request of an agency.
Before Fitzsimons, Oh. J., and O’Dwyer, J.

#### Jacob Samak, Respondent, v. Maurice L. Muhleman et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the City of New York in favor of plaintiff and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Jacob Brenner, for appellants; Nichols & Bacon (Alexander S. Bacon, of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.