alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2826

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1000 Avenida Sanchez

Osorio in Carolina, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘RobertoClemente Walker Post Office Building’’.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2826

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 1000 Avenida Sanchez Osorio in Carolina,

Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Roberto Clemente Walker Post

Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2826 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 1000 Avenida Sanchez Osorio in Carolina, Puerto

4 Rico, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Roberto

5 Clemente Walker Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Roberto Clemente Walker Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 23,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### §§ 324.54-324.60 [Reserved]
#### § 335.231 Certification, suspension of trading, and removal from listing by exchanges.

The provisions of the applicable and currently effective SEC regulations under section 12(d) of the Exchange Act shall be followed as codified at 17 part CFR 240.

[75 FR 73949, Nov. 30, 2010]
Exhibit 32.2




				Exhibit 99(i)

		 	   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
			       18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report  of  Datascension,  Inc.  (the"Company")
on Form 10-QSB  for the quarter ended  September 30 , 2005  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  D. Scott  Kincer,   Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section  906  of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies  with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results of  operations  of  the
Company.

                                      /s/ D. Scott Kincer
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                      D. Scott Kincer
					Principal Accounting Officer

Dated: November 21, 2005
§ 313.45 Certification of debt by FDIC as creditor agency. The Director may also issue a certification of the debt where there has not been a hearing, if the employee has admitted the debt, or failed to contest the existence and amount of the debt in a timely manner (e.g., by failing to request a hearing). The certification shall be in writing and shall state: ( a ) The amount and basis of the debt owed by the employee;
( b ) The date the FDIC's right to collect the debt first accrued;
( c ) That the FDIC's debt collection regulations have been approved by OPM pursuant to 5 CFR part 550, subpart K;
( d ) If the collection is to be made by lump-sum payment, the amount and date such payment will be collected;
( e ) If the collection is to be made in installments through salary offset, the number of installments to be collected, the amount of each installment, and the date of the first installment, if a date other than the next officially established pay period; and
( f ) The date the employee was notified of the debt, the action(s) taken pursuant to the FDIC's regulations, and the dates such actions were taken.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         173,183
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,357,092
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,983,751
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,959,418
<PP&E>                                         668,743
<DEPRECIATION>                                 352,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,373,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,661,701
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        125
<COMMON>                                           697
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,104,919
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,373,034
<SALES>                                      3,386,534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,386,534
<CGS>                                        1,841,593
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,952,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             270,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (725,858)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (726,659)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (726,659)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)


</TABLE>
MASTER AND SERVANT.

[Lucas Circuit Court,

September Term, 1893.]

Bentley, Haynes and Scribner, JJ.

#### Toledo Cons. St. Ry. Co. v. Rudolph Yunker.

Injury To Street Railway Employee. _

An injury to the driver of a street car drawn over the dash by the breaking of a hame strap, the defects of which were known to the stable foreman, is not a case of fellow servant, but of defective appliances and the company is liable.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas county.

*Baker, Smith & Baker,*for plaintiff in errror.

/. *H.*Southard, for defendant in error.

Haynes, J.

In this case Yunker sues the railroad company for alleged negligence in furnishing and using an unsafe hame strap which was used on the harness of the horse he was driving. The horse suddenly reared and plunged, the hame strap broke, and Yunker, who had hold of the lines, was suddenly and with force thrown or drawn over the dash-board of the car, and severely injured.

*Held,*that the jury were warranted in finding that the hame strap furnished and used by the company was of poor quality and insufficient for the service, and that the breaking of the one in use upon the horse Yunker was driving was the cause of the accident; that the company had knowledge of said defects through the foreman of the car barn, who, under the evidence, might properly be held to be the representative of the company in that behalf; also from statements made to the manager; that the doctrine of non-Jiability for acts of co-servant does not therefore apply to defeat the action; that the plaintiff was without negligence and might properly recover.

Judgment affirmed.
Amendment #3
                                ------------

	By this Amendment, Duke University ("DUKE") and CISTRON
Biotechnology, Inc. ("SPONSOR") agree to amend the terms of the Clinical
Study and Research Agreement entered into by the parties effective
September 1, 1998 ("Agreement"), and amended on December 18, 1999 and in
March, 1999 as follows:

        1. The parties agree that Article 1, Statement of Work, shall be
further expanded to include the research described in an additional
Statement of Work, a copy of which is attached to this Agreement as
Exhibit G.  The parties also agree that the SPONSOR shall provide
additional compensation to DUKE for the research set forth in
Exhibit G in accordance with the terms described in the supplemental
budget attached to this Agreement as Exhibit H.

        2. The parties agree that SPONSOR shall compensate DUKE as follows:
$20,719.16 shall be paid to DUKE no later that September 15, 1999.
The remaining balance of $20,719.16 shall be paid to DUKE on
completion of the Research and receipt by CISTRON of a final report
as detailed in the Agreement.

        3. The parties agree that the terms of the Clinical Study and
Research Agreement shall be extended through March 31, 2000 and may be
extended beyond that date by mutual agreement of both parties.

        4. All other terms of the Agreement are unchanged and remain in
full force and effect.

AGREED:

DUKE UNIVERSITY                       CISTRON BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.

By: /s/RALPH SNYDERMAN, M.D.          By: /s/RICHARD S.DONDERO
    ------------------------             ----------------------
       Ralph Snyderman, M.D.          Name:  Richard S. Dondero
     Chancellor for Health Affairs    Title: Vice President - Operations
                                                and New Product Development
Date: 9/8/99                          Date: September 1, 1999

Acknowledged:


By: /s/HERMAN F. STAATS, Ph.D.
    --------------------------
       Herman Staats, Ph.D.
       Principal Investigator
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of CNE Group,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB for the quarter  ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, George W. Benoit,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                   /s/ George W. Benoit
                                                   --------------------
                                                   George W. Benoit
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 23, 2005


                                       30
#### § 333.2 Change in general character of business.

No State nonmember insured bank (except a District bank) or branch thereof shall hereafter cause or permit any change to be made in the general character or type of business exercised by it after the effective date of this part without the prior written consent of the Corporation.

[15 FR 8644, Dec. 6, 1950]
# C_2020365EN.01000401.xml

| 29.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/4

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2020/C 365/04)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 9 July 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85361 |
| Decision No | 088/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title | Temporary amendments to the tax refund scheme for employing seafarers |
| Legal basis | The Act on subsidies for the employment of workers at sea and the Regulation on subsidies for the employment of workers at sea |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | To reduce the costs for shipping companies employing Norwegian and EEA seafares |
| Form of aid | Tax and social security refunds |
| Budget | Increase of NOK 75 million |
| Duration | The fourth term 2020, covering July and August 2020 |
| Economic sectors | Maritime transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Norwegian Maritime Authority |
| P.O.Box 2222 |
| N-5509 Haugesund |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

9 July 2020

Case No

85361

Decision No

088/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title

Temporary amendments to the tax refund scheme for employing seafarers

Legal basis

The Act on subsidies for the employment of workers at sea and the Regulation on subsidies for the employment of workers at sea

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

To reduce the costs for shipping companies employing Norwegian and EEA seafares

Form of aid

Tax and social security refunds

Budget

Increase of NOK 75 million

Duration

The fourth term 2020, covering July and August 2020

Economic sectors

Maritime transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Norwegian Maritime Authority

P.O.Box 2222

N-5509 Haugesund

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/.

---
#### § 308.41 Stays pending judicial review.

The commencement of proceedings for judicial review of a final decision and order of the FDIC may not, unless specifically ordered by the Board of Directors or a reviewing court, operate as a stay of any order issued by the FDIC. The Board of Directors may, in its discretion, and on such terms as the Board of Directors finds just, stay the effectiveness of all or any part of an order pending a final decision on a petition for review of that order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<NAME>                   THE LESLIE FAY COMPANY INC.
<CIK>                    0000796226

<S>                               <C>
        <PERIOD-TYPE>                      OTHER
        <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JAN-01-2000
        <PERIOD-START>                     JAN-03-1999
        <PERIOD-END>                       JUL-03-1999
        <CASH>                                6,186
        <SECURITIES>                              0
        <RECEIVABLES>                        22,917
        <ALLOWANCES>                          5,651
        <INVENTORY>                          35,105
        <CURRENT-ASSETS>                     59,948
        <PP&E>                                4,704
        <DEPRECIATION>                          913
        <TOTAL-ASSETS>                       70,133
        <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                22,600
        <BONDS>                                   0
        <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
        <PREFERRED>                               0
        <COMMON>                                 69
        <OTHER-SE>                           42,593
        <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         70,133
        <SALES>                              99,594
        <TOTAL-REVENUES>                     99,594
        <CGS>                                73,067
        <TOTAL-COSTS>                        17,651
        <OTHER-EXPENSES>                        534
        <LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
        <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    1,004
        <INCOME-PRETAX>                       7,338
        <INCOME-TAX>                          2,089
        <INCOME-CONTINUING>                   5,249
        <DISCONTINUED>                            0
        <EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
        <CHANGES>                                 0
        <NET-INCOME>                          5,249
        <EPS-BASIC>                          0.87
        <EPS-DILUTED>                          0.84


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,852
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,405
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (286)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,914
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,627
<PP&E>                                          11,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,020)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,697
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,223
<OTHER-SE>                                    (46,435)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,566
<SALES>                                         31,987
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,987
<CGS>                                           20,909
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,053
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 802
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    223
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                223
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       223
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
§ 324.123 Ongoing qualification. ( a ) *Changes to advanced systems.* An FDIC-supervised institution must meet all the qualification requirements in § 324.122 on an ongoing basis. An FDIC-supervised institution must notify the FDIC when the FDIC-supervised institution makes any change to an advanced system that would result in a material change in the FDIC-supervised institution's advanced approaches total risk-weighted asset amount for an exposure type or when the FDIC-supervised institution makes any significant change to its modeling assumptions.
( b ) *Failure to comply with qualification requirements.* ( 1 ) If the FDIC determines that an FDIC-supervised institution that uses this subpart and that has conducted a satisfactory parallel run fails to comply with the qualification requirements in § 324.122, the FDIC will notify the FDIC-supervised institution in writing of the FDIC-supervised institution's failure to comply.
( 2 ) The FDIC-supervised institution must establish and submit a plan satisfactory to the FDIC to return to compliance with the qualification requirements.
( 3 ) In addition, if the FDIC determines that the FDIC-supervised institution's advanced approaches total risk-weighted assets are not commensurate with the FDIC-supervised institution's credit, market, operational, or other risks, the FDIC may require such an FDIC-supervised institution to calculate its advanced approaches total risk-weighted assets with any modifications provided by the FDIC.
#### § 345.45 Publication of planned examination schedule.

The FDIC publishes on its public website, at least 30 days in advance of the beginning of each calendar quarter, a list of banks scheduled for CRA examinations for the next two quarters.
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-163231 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 26, 2010 (June 2, 2010 as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 18), relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Bell Microproducts Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs regarding the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC 470-20,Debt with Conversion and Other Options (formerly FSP APB 14-1) and the restatement described in Note 18 to those consolidated financial statements) and our report dated March 26, 2010, relating to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 (June 2, 2010 as to the material weakness relating to the preparation of the statements of cash flows) (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting because of material weaknesses), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


San Jose, California


June 2, 2010
# C_2022288EN.01003401.xml

| 29.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/34

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

28 July 2022

(2022/C 288/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0122 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,26 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4442 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83586 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4490 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 0,9745 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8983 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,609 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 407,30 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7908 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9342 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 18,1417 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4535 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2986 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 7,9456 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6172 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4009 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 320,45 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,0011 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,8325 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5200 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 107,59 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5071 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,592 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,097 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,3300 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6760 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,6535 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0122

JPY

Japanese yen

137,26

DKK

Danish krone

7,4442

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83586

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4490

CHF

Swiss franc

0,9745

ISK

Iceland króna

138,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8983

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,609

HUF

Hungarian forint

407,30

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7908

RON

Romanian leu

4,9342

TRY

Turkish lira

18,1417

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4535

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2986

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

7,9456

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6172

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4009

KRW

South Korean won

1 320,45

ZAR

South African rand

17,0011

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,8325

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5200

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 107,59

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5071

PHP

Philippine peso

56,592

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

37,097

BRL

Brazilian real

5,3300

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6760

INR

Indian rupee

80,6535

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---