alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016052EN.01001601.xml

| 11.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/16

---

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

(2016/C 52/11)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 28 October 2015 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 78015 |
| Decision No | : | 444/15/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Legal basis | : | Regulation 2005-12-21-1720 |
| Type of measure | : | Maritime aid |
| Objective | : | Employment |
| Form of aid | : | Tax refund |
| Budget | : | Estimated NOK 900 million for the first half of 2016 |
| Duration | : | 1.1.2016-30.6.2016 |
| Economic sectors | : | Maritime transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries |
| P.O. Box 8090 Dep |
| N-0032 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

28 October 2015

Case No

Case No

:

78015

Decision No

Decision No

:

444/15/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

Regulation 2005-12-21-1720

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Maritime aid

Objective

Objective

:

Employment

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

Tax refund

Budget

Budget

:

Estimated NOK 900 million for the first half of 2016

Duration

Duration

:

1.1.2016-30.6.2016

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Maritime transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries

P.O. Box 8090 Dep

N-0032 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
# C_2022325EN.01000601.xml

| 29.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/6

---

Corrigendum to Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: — 0,00 % on 1 August 2022 — Euro exchange rates (2022/C 295/04)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 295 of 2 August 2022
  )

(2022/C 325/05)

In the title:

for

‘0,00 % on 1 August 2022’,

read

‘0,50 % on 1 August 2022’.

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11891 and #11892]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of New York dated 10/02/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Straight-Line Winds, and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         07/06/2009 through 07/07/2009.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         10/02/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/01/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/02/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Westchester. *Contiguous Counties:* New York. Bronx, Orange, Putnam, Rockland. Connecticut. Fairfield. New Jersey. Bergen. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentHomeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.875Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.437Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11891 6 and for economic injury is 11892 0.The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are New York, Connecticut, New Jersey.
 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: October 2, 2009. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. E9-24411 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL T. HAYES,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. IDAHO CORRECTIONAL CENTER; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 18

- 35841
D.C. No. 1:12

- cv - 00351

- BLW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding Submitted July 14, 2020 * *
Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND , and R. NELSON , Circuit Judges.
Idaho state prisoner Michael T. Hayes appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a F irst
Amendment claim arising out of the opening of his legal mail

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo cross

- motions for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 16 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 35841

summary judgment

. Hamby v. Hammond , 821 F.3d 1085, 109 0 (9th Cir. 2016).
We affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendant Burke
because Hayes failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether
Burke personally participated in or caused the opening of his legal mail on December 28, 2010 and March 2, 201 1

. See Jones v. Williams , 297 F.3d 930, 934 (9th Cir. 2002) ( liability under § 1983 requires personal participation by the defendant in the alleged rights deprivation ); see also Starr v. Baca , 652 F.3d 1202,
1207

- 08 (9th Cir. 2011) (elements for sup ervisory liability under § 1983).
The district cour t did not abuse its discretion by striking Hayes’s third amended complaint because Hayes did not seek and obtain leave of court to file an amended complaint as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1 5(a)(2). See Ready Transp., Inc. v. AAR Mfg., Inc. , 627 F.3d 402, 40 3

- 0 4 (9th Cir. 2010) (setting forth standard of review and explaining that a district court has inherent power to control its docket, including power to strike items from the docket); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) (explaining that a party may amend “only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave” when it cannot amend as a matter of course under Rule 15(a)(1)).
The district court did not abuse its discr etion by denying Hayes’s untimely motion for leave to amend his complaint because Hayes did not demonstrate good3 18

- 35841

caus e for seeking amendment after the deadline to file motions to amend set forth in the Scheduling Order

. See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc. , 975 F.2d 604, 607

- 09 (9th Cir. 1992) (setting forth standard of review and good cause
standard ).
AFFIRMED.
#### Chaney *v.*The State.

*Grand Larceny.*

(Decided November 25, 1913.

63 South. 693.)

1. *Trial; Objection to Evidence; Crime.*— Where no objection was interposed to the question before it was answered, a motion to strike out the testimony thus elicited will not lie.

2. *Criminal Lato; Sentence; Time.*— That part of a judgment entry in a criminal case specifying the clay of the month and the year on which the sentence of imprisonment shall commence and expire is surplusage and may be stricken and the judgment corrected, especially when rendered inappropriate due to the suspension of sentence pending an appeal.

*46Appeal from Clarke Circuit Court.

Heard before Hou. John T. Lackland.

Green Chaney was convicted of grand larceny, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

No counsel marked for appellant.

R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

PELHAM, J. —

When this case was before us on the former appeal, we held that there was no evidence shown by the bill of exceptions connecting this defendant (jointly tried and convicted together with three co-defendants) with the commission of the offense charged, except the testimony of his *accomplices.*— Chaney *et al. v. State,*4 Ala. App. 89, 58 South. 685. On the trial resulting in the judgment from which the present appeal is prosecuted, the evidence on the former trial was introduced, and in addition thereto the testimony of a witness not an accomplice, corroborative of this defendant’s connection with the crime charged against him.

The recitals in the bill of exceptions show that the defendant moved to exclude the testimony of this witness, but no objection is shown to have been made or exception reserved to the question or questions eliciting it, and for aught we know the answer was responsive to the question and the defendant refrained from objecting to the question speculating on a favorable an*swer.*— Powell *v. State,*5 Ala. App. 463, 58 South. 951. Nor do we think the evidence inadmissible, or that the objection to a question eliciting it, if made in time, would have been well taken.

That part of the judgment entry specifying the day of the month and the year upon which the sentence *47should commence and expire is surplusage, and as it is inappropriate as applied to the changed, conditions as to time, due to the suspension of the sentence pending an appeal,' the same is stricken, and the judgment appealed from as thus corrected, is *affirmed.*— Perkins *v. State, Infra.,*63 South. 692, present term.

Corrected and affirmed.
§ 328.106 Informal resolution. ( a ) If the FDIC has reason to believe that any person may be misusing an FDIC-Associated Image or FDIC-Associated Term or otherwise violating § 328.102(a), or may be making false or misleading representations regarding deposit insurance in violation of § 328.102(b), the FDIC may issue an advisory letter to such a person and/or any person who aids or abets another in such conduct, including any Third-Party Publisher. Generally, such an advisory letter will: ( 1 ) Alert the recipient of advisory letter of the basis for the FDIC's concerns;
( 2 ) Request that the person and/or Third-Party Publisher: ( i ) Take reasonable steps to prevent any violations of section 18(a) of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1828(a)) and this subpart;
( ii ) Commit in writing to refrain from such violations in the future; and
( iii ) Notify the FDIC in writing that the identified concerns have been fully addressed and remediated; and
( 2 ) Offer the person or Third-Party Publisher the opportunity to provide additional information, documentation, or justifications to substantiate the representations made or otherwise refute the FDIC's expressed concerns.
( b ) Except in cases where the FDIC has reason to believe that consumers or Insured Depository Institutions may suffer harm arising from continued violations, recipients of advisory letters described in paragraph (a) of this section will be provided not less than fifteen (15) days to provide the requested commitment, explanation, or justification.
( c ) Where a recipient of an advisory letter described in paragraph (a) of this section provides the FDIC with the requested written commitments within the timeframe specified in the letter, and where any required remediation has been verified by FDIC staff, the FDIC will generally take no further administrative enforcement against such a party under § 328.107.
( d ) Where a recipient of an advisory letter described in paragraph (a) of this section fails to respond to the letter, fails to make the requested commitments, or fails to provide additional information, documentation, or justifications that the FDIC, in its discretion, finds adequate to substantiate the representations made or otherwise refute the concerns set forth in the advisory letter, the FDIC may pursue all remedies set forth in this subpart.
( e ) Nothing in this section will prevent the FDIC from commencing a formal enforcement action under § 328.107 at any time before or after the issuance of an advisory letter under this section if: ( 1 ) The FDIC has reason to believe that consumers or Insured Depository Institutions may suffer harm arising from continued violations; or
( 2 ) The person to whom such an advisory letter would be sent has previously received a similar advisory letter from the FDIC under paragraph (a) of this section.
#### § 221.104 Federal credit unions.

For text of the interpretation on Federal credit unions, see 12 CFR 220.110.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 23 (Thursday, February 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 6155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2459]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than February 20, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Redemptus Group LLC, Atlanta, Georgia, to acquire voting shares 
of McIntosh Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of McIntosh State Bank, both of Jackson, Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 2, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-2459 Filed 2-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0824

DCN CBM00705 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
# L_2015295EN.01006301.xml

| 12.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 295/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 295/63

---

DECISION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THE EFTA STATES

No 2/2015/SC

of 24 September 2015

establishing an EEA Financial Mechanism Interim Committee 2014-21 [2015/2024]

THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF THE EFTA STATES,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement,

Having regard to the agreement to be concluded establishing a new EEA Financial Mechanism for the period 2014-21,

Having regard to the agreement to be concluded between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Union to establish a Norwegian Financial Mechanism for the period 2014-21,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

1.   An EEA Financial Mechanism Interim Committee 2014-21, hereinafter referred to as the Interim Committee, which should be operative as soon as possible, is hereby established.

2.   The Interim Committee shall assist the EFTA States in preparing for the implementation of the EEA Financial Mechanism for 2014-21.

3.   The Interim Committee shall report to the Standing Committee.

4.   The Interim Committee may be assisted by the Missions of the EEA EFTA States to the EU.

5.   The Interim Committee shall on the day of entering into force or on the day of provisional application of the agreement establishing the EEA Financial Mechanism 2014-21 be replaced by an EEA Financial Mechanism Committee 2014-21.

6.   The Interim Committee shall discuss and assess possible coordination between the EEA Financial Mechanism and the Norwegian Financial Mechanism.

7.   The Interim Committee shall agree upon a Chairman who shall be confirmed by the Standing Committee.

Article 2

This Decision shall take immediate effect.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 September 2015.

For the Standing Committee

Acting Chair

Ingrid SCHULERUD

The Secretary-General

Kristinn F. ÁRNASON

---
#### James C. Lenney et al., Respondents, *v.*Estelle S. Salomon, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Mew York, tenth district, borough of Manhattan.

Van Schaick, Morton & Quinby, for appellant.

S. Callaghan, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

Exhibits A. and B. do not constitute a contract between plaintiffs and defendant on which plaintiffs can sue. The attorneys for the defendant in the action of Heisman v. Salomon had no authority to bind the defendant to pay the attorneys for the plaintiffs in the action last above mentioned their fees. Moreover, even if the defendant’s attorney had the implied authority to make the contract set up in the complaint herein it was no more than a contract to pay the sum of $150' and costs, that is taxable costs, or costs to be taxed. The evidence shows that costs never have been taxed.

This case is to be distinguished from the case of Pilkington v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 49 App. Div. 22, in which the agreement was entitled in the action and signed on behalf of the defendant by the individual who made the settlement and is an express agreement of the defendant.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dueño, J J.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
# Uradni list C 360I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 360I |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 648. september 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 360I

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 648. september 2021

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacije |
| | INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Svet |
| 2021/C 360 I/01 | Sklep Sveta z dne 6. septembra 2021 o sprejetju stališča Sveta o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2022 | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

IV   Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Svet

2021/C 360 I/01

Sklep Sveta z dne 6. septembra 2021 o sprejetju stališča Sveta o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2022

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

IV Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Svet

| 8.9.2021 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CI 360/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2021

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CI 360/1

---

SKLEP SVETA

z dne 6. septembra 2021

o sprejetju stališča Sveta o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2022

(2021/C 360 I/01)

SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE JE –

ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) in zlasti člena 314(3) PDEU v povezavi s Pogodbo o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo (Euratom) in zlasti členom 106a Pogodbe Euratom,

ob upoštevanju naslednjega:

| 1. | Komisija je 9. julija 2021 predložila predlog, ki vsebuje predlog splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2022 (1). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Komisija je 9. julija 2021 predložila predlog, ki vsebuje predlog splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2022 (1).

| 2. | Svet je predlog Komisije preučil, da bi oblikoval stališče, ki bi bilo glede prihodkov skladno s Sklepom Sveta (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 z dne 14. decembra 2020 o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropske unije in razveljavitvi Sklepa 2014/335/EU, Euratom (2), glede odhodkov pa z Uredbo Sveta (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093 z dne 17. decembra 2020 o določitvi večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2021–2027 (3) – |
| --- | --- |

2.

Svet je predlog Komisije preučil, da bi oblikoval stališče, ki bi bilo glede prihodkov skladno s Sklepom Sveta (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 z dne 14. decembra 2020 o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropske unije in razveljavitvi Sklepa 2014/335/EU, Euratom (2), glede odhodkov pa z Uredbo Sveta (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093 z dne 17. decembra 2020 o določitvi večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2021–2027 (3) –

SPREJEL NASLEDNJI SKLEP:

Edini člen

Svet je svoje stališče o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2022 sprejel 6. septembra 2021.

Celotno besedilo si je mogoče ogledati na spletišču Sveta http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ ali ga od tam prenesti.

V Bruslju, 6. septembra 2021.

Za Svet

Predsednik

G. DOVŽAN

---

(1)  COM(2021) 300 final.

1

(2)  UL L 424, 15.12.2020, str. 1.

2

(3)  UL L 433 I, 22.12.2020, str. 11.

3

---
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Ingrid Setzler" <isetzler@bpu.com> Date: 7/26/2010 11:16 AM Subject: RE: Extension Request for BPU Plant ID's 03977 & 07022 Attachments: pic02800.gif Greetings, EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the following Kansas City Board of Public Utilities facilities:

Nearman Creek Quindaro The deadline for your plant to submit Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. If you need assistance during the completion of the stea m electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560. Sincerely, (Embedded image moved to file: pic02800.gif)

From: "Ingrid Setzler" <isetzler@bpu.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/23/2010 11:04 AM Subject: RE: Extension Request for BPU Plant ID's 03977 & 07022

Ms. Alicea – I am responded to your voicemail on July 22, 2010 regarding the extension request for the Wastewater ICR, BPU facility ID numbers 03977 and 07022. You had requested my email address: isetzler@bpu.com. I look forward to your response. Thank you,

Ingrid Setzler Sr. Environmental Scientist Kansas City Board of Public UtilitiesTel: 913.573.9806 Fax: 913.573.9838
#### §§ 217.13-217.19 [Reserved]