alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022016EN.01000201.xml

| 13.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/2

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2022/C 16/02)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 27 September 2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 87382 |
| Decision No | 224/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 amendments to scheme for cancelled and downscaled cultural events |
| Legal basis | Regulation on a temporary compensation scheme for cancelled, closed or downscaled cultural events in the period 1 July to 31 October 2021 as a consequence of the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | To remedy the shortage of liquidity that organisers and subcontractors to cultural events face following the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | NOK 425 million |
| Intensity | For eligible organisers, a grant of up to 95 % of unavoidable costs related to cancelled, closed or downscaled eligible events in the period 1 July to 31 October 2021
  For eligible subcontractors, a grant of up to 50 % of loss of income and additional costs related to cancelled, closed or downscaled eligible events in the period 1 July to 31 October 2021 |
| Duration | Until 31 December 2021 |
| Economic sectors | Cultural sector |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Arts Council Norway |
| P.O. Box 4808 Nydalen |
| N-0422 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

27 September 2021

Case No

87382

Decision No

224/21/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 amendments to scheme for cancelled and downscaled cultural events

Legal basis

Regulation on a temporary compensation scheme for cancelled, closed or downscaled cultural events in the period 1 July to 31 October 2021 as a consequence of the COVID-19 outbreak

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

To remedy the shortage of liquidity that organisers and subcontractors to cultural events face following the COVID-19 outbreak

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

NOK 425 million

Intensity

For eligible organisers, a grant of up to 95 % of unavoidable costs related to cancelled, closed or downscaled eligible events in the period 1 July to 31 October 2021

For eligible subcontractors, a grant of up to 50 % of loss of income and additional costs related to cancelled, closed or downscaled eligible events in the period 1 July to 31 October 2021

Duration

Until 31 December 2021

Economic sectors

Cultural sector

Name and address of the granting authority

Arts Council Norway

P.O. Box 4808 Nydalen

N-0422 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
#### § 324.305 Exposures related to the Paycheck Protection Program Lending Facility.

Notwithstanding any other section of this part, an FDIC-supervised institution may exclude exposures pledged as collateral for a non-recourse loan that is provided as part of the Paycheck Protection Program Lending Facility, announced by the Federal Reserve on April 7, 2020, from total leverage exposure, average total consolidated assets, advanced approaches total risk-weighted assets, and standardized total risk-weighted assets, as applicable. For the purpose of this section, an FDIC-supervised institution's liability under the facility must be reduced by the principal amount of the loans pledged as collateral for funds advanced under the facility.

[85 FR 20394, Apr. 13, 2020. Redesignated at 85 FR 32990, June 1, 2020]
# C_2022428EN.01000601.xml

| 10.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 428/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 428/6

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections to certain state aid measures and finding no state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

(2022/C 428/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measures, or considers that the following measures do not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement.

| Date of adoption of the decision | 6 July 2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85218 |
| Decision No | 160/22/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | Sandnes Municipality |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Sandnes Ulf |
| Legal basis | Municipal decisions |
| Type of measure | Investment and operating aid |
| Objective | Sports, recreation and education |
| Form of aid | Grants, loan, guarantee, lease agreement |
| Economic sectors | Football stadium |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Sandnes Municipality |
| Postboks 583, |
| NO-4302 Sandnes |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

6 July 2022

Case No

85218

Decision No

160/22/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Region

Sandnes Municipality

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Sandnes Ulf

Legal basis

Municipal decisions

Type of measure

Investment and operating aid

Objective

Sports, recreation and education

Form of aid

Grants, loan, guarantee, lease agreement

Economic sectors

Football stadium

Name and address of the granting authority

Sandnes Municipality

Postboks 583,

NO-4302 Sandnes

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
§ 265.1 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) Pursuant to section 11(k) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 248(k)), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Board) may delegate, by published order or rule, any of its functions other than those relating to rulemaking or pertaining principally to monetary and credit policies to Board members and employees, Reserve Banks, or administrative law judges. Pursuant to section 11(i) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 248(i)), the Board may make all rules and regulations necessary to enable it to effectively perform the duties, functions, or services specified in that Act. Other provisions of Federal law also may authorize specific delegations by the Board.
( b ) This part details the functions that the Board has delegated. Subpart A contains general provisions pertaining to delegations of authority, including review of action taken pursuant to delegated authority. Subpart B contains the specific functions delegated to Board members, Board employees and the Federal Reserve Banks. Except as otherwise indicated in this part, the Board will review a delegated action only if a Board member, at his or her own initiative, requests a review.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3130 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3130

      To amend the Head Start Act to require parental consent for 
             nonemergency intrusive physical examinations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2003

 Mr. Sullivan (for himself, Mr. Pitts, Mr. DeMint, Mrs. Musgrave, and 
 Mr. Burgess) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Head Start Act to require parental consent for 
             nonemergency intrusive physical examinations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HEAD START ACT AMENDMENT IMPOSING PARENTAL CONSENT 
              REQUIREMENT FOR NONEMERGENCY INTRUSIVE PHYSICAL 
              EXAMINATIONS.

    The Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9831 et seq.) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new section:

``SEC. 657A. PARENTAL CONSENT REQUIREMENT FOR NONEMERGENCY INTRUSIVE 
              PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS.

    ``(a) In General.--A Head Start agency shall obtain written 
parental consent before administration of any nonemergency intrusive 
physical examination of a child in connection with participation in a 
program under this subchapter.
    ``(b) Definition.--The term `nonemergency intrusive physical 
examination' means, with respect to a child, a physical examination 
that--
            ``(1) is not immediately necessary to protect the health or 
        safety of the child involved or the health or safety of another 
        individual; and
            ``(2) requires incision or is otherwise invasive, or 
        involves exposure of private body parts''.
                                 <all>
```
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No s
. 40303 /40304

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

GARY WILLIAM CLOE ,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 356

Filed: February 12, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS I S AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fou rth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Patrick H. Owen , District Judge.

Judgment s of conviction and unified sentence of ten years with seven years determinate, and consecutive sentence of ten years indeterminate, for two charges of operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol

, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before LANSING, Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

In this consolidated appeal, Gary William Cloe was convicted of two charges of

operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol , Idaho Code § § 18

- 8004; 18

- 8005(9)

. In

Docket No. 40303, t he district court sentenced Cloe to a unified term of ten years with a

minimum period of confinement of seven years ; and in Docket No. 40304, the district court

imposed a ten

- year indeterminate term to run consecutive to the sentence in Docket No. 40303

. Cloe appeals, contending that his sentence s are excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the tr ial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and2 need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-

1 5 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Cloe ’s judgment s of conviction and sentence s are affirmed.
§ 311.4 Procedures for announcing meetings. ( a ) *Scope.* Except to the extent that such announcements are exempt from disclosure under § 311.3(b), announcements relating to open meetings, and meetings closed under the regular closing procedures of § 311.5, will be made in the manner set forth in this section.
( b ) *Time and content of announcement.* The Corporation will make public announcement at least seven days before the meeting of the time, place, and subject matter of the meeting, whether it is to be open or closed to the public, and the name and telephone number of the official designated by the Corporation to respond to requests for information about the meeting. This announcement will be made unless a majority of the Board determines by a recorded vote that Corporation business requires that a meeting be called on lesser notice. In such cases, the Corporation will make public announcement of the time, place, and subject matter of the meeting, and whether it is open or closed to the public, at the earliest practicable time, which may be later than the commencement of the meeting.
( c ) *Changing time or place of meeting.* The time or place of a meeting may be changed following the public announcement required by paragraph (b) of this section only if the Corporation publicly announces the change at the earliest practicable time, which may be later than the commencement of the meeting.
( d ) *Changing subject matter or nature of meeting.* The subject matter of a meeting, or the determination to open or close a meeting or a portion of a meeting, may be changed following the public announcement only if: ( 1 ) A majority of the entire Board determines by recorded vote that agency business so requires and that no earlier announcement of the change was possible; and,
( 2 ) The Corporation publicly announces the change and the vote of each member upon such change at the earliest practicable time, which may be later than the commencement of the meeting.
( e ) *Publication of announcements in Federal Register.* Immediately following each public announcement under this section, such announcement will be submitted for publication in the Federal Register by the Executive Secretary.
[42 FR 14675, Mar. 16, 1977, as amended at 67 FR 71071, Nov. 29, 2002]
# C_2022170EN.01000801.xml

| 25.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

22 April 2022

(2022/C 170/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0817 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,83 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4402 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83925 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2780 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0336 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6255 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,320 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 370,35 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6336 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9455 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 15,9446 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4816 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3714 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4859 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6193 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4784 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 344,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,8652 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0332 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5625 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 603,47 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6784 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,721 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,724 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,0926 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,0034 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,6943 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0817

JPY

Japanese yen

138,83

DKK

Danish krone

7,4402

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83925

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2780

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0336

ISK

Iceland króna

139,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6255

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,320

HUF

Hungarian forint

370,35

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6336

RON

Romanian leu

4,9455

TRY

Turkish lira

15,9446

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4816

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3714

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4859

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6193

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4784

KRW

South Korean won

1 344,04

ZAR

South African rand

16,8652

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0332

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5625

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 603,47

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6784

PHP

Philippine peso

56,721

RUB

Russian rouble

THB

Thai baht

36,724

BRL

Brazilian real

5,0926

MXN

Mexican peso

22,0034

INR

Indian rupee

82,6943

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
EXHIBIT
31.1




CERTIFICATION




I, Peter
Frugone, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arrow Resources Development,
Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):









a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial
reporting.




Date: August
23, 2010.






/s/
Peter Frugone


Chief
Executive Officer
#### § 252.30 Scope.

This subpart applies to bank holding companies with average total consolidated assets of $100 billion or more.

[84 FR 59103, Nov. 1, 2019]
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 23.01



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(333-40027) on Form S-8 of Hybrid Networks, Inc. of our report dated February
10, 2000 relating to the balance sheets as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and
the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash
flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1999,
which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of
Hybrid Networks, Inc.

/s/ Hein + Associates LLP

Hein + Associates LLP
Certified Public Accountants

Orange, California
March 24, 2000
#### § 269b.443 Motions before or after a hearing.

All motions (including motions for intervention), other than those made during a hearing, shall be made in writing to the Secretary of the panel, shall briefly state the relief sought, shall set forth the grounds for such motion, and shall be accompanied 3 days thereafter by proof of service on all parties. Answering statements, if any, must be served on all parties and the original thereof, together with two copies and statement of service, shall be filed with the Secretary within 5 days after service of the moving papers, unless the Secretary directs otherwise. Motions may be referred to the hearing officer whose ruling shall be made upon the record or the motion may be stayed until such time as the panel reviews the hearing officer's report and recommendations.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, William E. Franklin, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Copart, Inc. on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that, based on my knowledge, the information containedin this Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of Copart, Inc.
| /s/ WILLIAM  E. FRANKLIN              |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| William E.  Franklin                  |   |
| Senior Vice  President of Finance and |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer              |   |

 

Date: September 28,2007

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Copart, Inc. and will be retained by Copart, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoingcertification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing.

----