alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1





               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
San Diego, CA



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of the Post Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Form
S-4 of our report dated March 6, 1998, relating to the financial statements of
Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.

We also consent to the references to us under the caption "Experts" in the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus.




                                               BDO Seidman, LLP
                                               New York, NY



March 27, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,598
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,068
<PP&E>                                           4,709
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,699
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,369
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,100
<SALES>                                         19,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,666
<CGS>                                            9,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,948)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       115
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,940)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,063)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 327.33 Determination of eligible institution's credit amount. ( a ) Subject to paragraph (c) of this section, allocation of the one-time credit shall be based on each eligible insured depository institution's 1996 assessment base ratio.
( b ) Subject to paragraph (c) of this section, an eligible insured depository institution's 1996 assessment base ratio shall consist of: ( 1 ) Its assessment base as of December 31, 1996 (adjusted as appropriate to reflect the assessment base of December 31, 1996, of all institutions for which it is the successor), as the numerator; and
( 2 ) The combined aggregate assessment bases of all eligible insured depository institutions, including any successor institutions, as of December 31, 1996, as the denominator.
( c ) If an insured depository institution is a successor to an eligible insured depository institution under the *de facto* rule, as defined in paragraph 327.31(c) of this subpart, the successor and the eligible insured depository institution will divide the eligible insured depository institution's 1996 assessment base ratio pro rata, based on the deposit liabilities assumed in the transaction. In any subsequent transaction involving an insured depository institution that previously engaged in a transaction to which the *de facto* rule applied, the insured depository institution may not be deemed to have transferred more than its remaining 1996 assessment base ratio. If the transferring institution is no longer an insured depository institution after the transfer, the last successor will acquire the transferring institution's remaining 1996 assessment base ratio.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPresent state of knowledge of the upper atmosphere:  An assessment reportA program of research, technology, and monitoring of the phenomena of the upper atmosphere, to provide for an understanding of and to maintain the chemical and physical integrity of the Earth's upper atmosphere was developed. NASA implemented a long-range upper atmospheric science program aimed at developing an organized, solid body of knowledge of upper atmospheric processes while providing, in the near term, assessments of potential effects of human activities on the atmosphere. The effects of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) releases on stratospheric ozone were reported. Issues relating the current understanding of ozone predictions and trends and highlights recent and future anticipated developments that will improve our understanding of the system are summarized.Document ID19860007326Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1984Subject CategoryGeophysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-87559NAS 1.15:87559Accession Number86N16796Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860007326.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2020447EN.01001601.xml

| 23.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 447/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 447/16

---

EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 September 2020

(Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of ESA’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (1))

(2020/C 447/06)

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines as amended by ESA’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To obtain the applicable reference rates, appropriate margins shall be added to the base rate in accordance with the State Aid Guidelines.

Base rates have been determined as follows:

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.9.2020 – | 1,80 | - 0,46 | 0,32 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.9.2020 –

1,80

- 0,46

0,32

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and EEA Supplement to the OJ No. 26/2006, 25 May 2006, p. 1.

---
§ 308.38 Recommended decision and filing of record. ( a ) *Filing of recommended decision and record.* Within 45 days after expiration of the time allowed for filing reply briefs under § 308.37(b), the ALJ will file with and certify to the Administrative Officer, for decision, the record of the proceeding. The record must include the ALJ's recommended decision, recommended findings of fact, recommended conclusions of law, and proposed order; all prehearing and hearing transcripts, exhibits, and rulings; and the motions, briefs, memoranda, and other supporting papers filed in connection with the hearing. The ALJ will serve upon each party the recommended decision, findings, conclusions, and proposed order.
( b ) *Filing of index.* At the same time the ALJ files with and certifies to the Administrative Officer for final determination the record of the proceeding, the ALJ will furnish to the Administrative Officer a certified index of the entire record of the proceeding. The certified index must include, at a minimum, an entry for each paper, document, or motion filed with the ALJ in the proceeding, the date of the filing, and the identity of the filer. The certified index must also include an exhibit index containing, at a minimum, an entry consisting of exhibit number and title or description for: each exhibit introduced and admitted into evidence at the hearing; each exhibit introduced but not admitted into evidence at the hearing; each exhibit introduced and admitted into evidence after the completion of the hearing; and each exhibit introduced but not admitted into evidence after the completion of the hearing.
§ 313.90 Content of decision. The written decision shall include: ( a ) A summary of the facts presented;
( b ) The hearing official's findings, analysis and conclusions; and
( c ) The terms of any repayment schedule, if applicable.
§ 60.2 Definitions. For the purposes of this part: *Accompanying individual* means an individual seeking Fisher House or other temporary lodging, who provides familial support or the equivalent of familial support, to a veteran while the veteran is experiencing an episode of care. This term is defined broadly to include relatives, close friends, and caregivers.
*Compensation and pension examination* means an examination requested by VA's Veterans Benefits Administration to be conducted at a VA health care facility for the purpose of evaluating a veteran's claim.
*Episode of care* means a course of outpatient treatment, or a period of hospitalization, during which a veteran receives health care under 38 U.S.C. chapter 17, or 38 U.S.C. 8111 or 8153. Examples of episodes of care include (but are not limited to) the following: ( 1 ) An appointment at a VA health care facility to receive health care or a compensation and pension examination.
( 2 ) Extended outpatient treatment, such as treatment associated with organ transplant, chemotherapy, or radiation.
( 3 ) Hospitalization for a critical injury or illness; where death is imminent; or where a veteran is unable to make medical decisions for him/herself and the accompanying individual is authorized to make such decisions on the veteran's behalf.
*Fisher House* means a housing facility that is located at or near a VA health care facility and was constructed by and donated to VA by the Fisher House Foundation (formerly the Zachary and Elizabeth M. Fisher Armed Services Foundation), or a facility that is treated as if it were Fisher House lodging under § 60.3.
*Other temporary lodging* includes: ( 1 ) Lodging at a temporary lodging facility, other than a Fisher House, located at a VA health care facility (generally referred to as a “hoptel”);
( 2 ) A hotel or motel;
( 3 ) Non-utilized beds at a VA health care facility designated as lodging beds; and
( 4 ) Other donated lodging to be used on a temporary basis in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 1708.
*VA* means the Department of Veterans Affairs.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1708)
Editorial Note
Editorial Note: At 79 FR 2100, Jan. 13, 2014, § 60.2 was amended by removing “VA's Compensation and Pension Service” and adding, in its place, “the Compensation Service or the Pension and Fiduciary Service”; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2851

To amend title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act to improve the 

affordability of health insurance coverage for small employers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2003

Mr. PENCE (for himself, Mr. SESSIONS, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. PAUL, Mr. 

RYUN of Kansas, Mr. TERRY, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mrs. NORTHUP, Mr. 

FLAKE, Mr. CRANE, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. JONES of North 

Carolina, Mr. OTTER, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, and Mr. SENSENBRENNER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act 

to improve the affordability of health insurance coverage 

for small employers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SEC. 1. REPEAL OF GUARANTEED ISSUE IN SMALL GROUP 

4 MARKET. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 2711 of 

6 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg–11) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘in a Statel’’ and all that follows 
2

•HR 2851 IH 

1 through ‘‘must accept for enrollment’’ and inserting ‘‘in 

2 a State must accept for enrollment’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATES.—

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 

5 the amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply 

6 with respect to group health plans, and health insur7 ance coverage offered in connection with group 

8 health plans, for plan years beginning on or after 

9 January 1, 2004 (in this subsection referred to as 

10 the ‘‘general effective date’’) and also shall apply to 

11 portions of plan years occurring on and after such 

12 date. 

13 (2) TREATMENT OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING

14 AGREEMENTS.—In the case of a group health plan 

15 maintained pursuant to 1 or more collective bar16 gaining agreements between employee representa17 tives and 1 or more employers ratified before the 

18 date of enactment of this Act, the amendments made 

19 by this Act shall not apply to plan years beginning 

20 before the later of—

21 (A) the date on which the last collective 

22 bargaining agreements relating to the plan ter23 minates (determined without regard to any ex24 tension thereof agreed to after the date of en25 actment of this Act); or 
3

•HR 2851 IH 

1 (B) the general effective date. 

2 For purposes of subparagraph (A), any plan amendment 

3 made pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement relat4 ing to the plan which amends the plan solely to conform 

5 to any requirement added by this section shall not be 

6 treated as a termination of such collective bargaining 

7 agreement.

Æ
Exhibit
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Theragenics Corporation ® ,
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, M.
      Christine Jacobs, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the
                Report.








By: /s/
      M.
      Christine Jacobs


M.
      Christine Jacobs


Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      8, 2005








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Theragenics Corporation ® and will
      be retained by Theragenics Corporation ® and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Exhibit 12.2

I, Vittorio Notarpietro, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 20-F of Natuzzi S.p.A.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys
other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 30, 2018



/s/ Vittorio NotarpietroName:

Vittorio NotarpietroTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arrow Resources
      Development, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended on September
      30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Frugone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
      Peter Frugone


Peter
      Frugone





Date: November
      17, 2008.
42637.

#### ATLANTIC MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CHADWICK.

Per Curiam.

1. Where a policy of insurance is conditioned to pay for “direct loss to the property covered ... by the following perils as defined and limited herein. I. Fire and lightning, excluding any loss resulting from any electrical injury or disturbance to electrical appliances, devices or wiring from artificial causes, unless fire ensues, and if fire does ensue, this company shall be liable only for its proportion of loss caused by such ensuing fire,” and there is evidence that lightning struck the insured premises, killing two trees and burning off the valve head of a water pump under the house, with the result that water escaping from the pipes caused moisture to rise and buckle the wooden flooring, with additional mold and mildew damage, such damage was a direct loss by lightning within the meaning of the policy provisions. *Insurance Co. of N. A. v. Leader,*121 Ga. 260 (1) (48 SE 972); *City of Dublin v. Ogburn,*142 Ga. 840 (2, 4) (83 SE 939); *Sun Ins. Office v. Guest Camera Store,*108 Ga. App. 339 (132 SE2d 851).

*851
      *Jordan, P. J., Deen and Quillian, JJ., concur.*

Argued March 8, 1967

Decided June 9, 1967.

*Long, Weinberg Ansley, Gregg Loomis,*for appellant.

*Merritt & Pruitt, Robert P. Burgess,*for appellee.

2. Moreover, Paragraph 2 of the petition, which alleges that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the amount of $1,968.75, is specifically admitted in the answer. A party to a suit will not be allowed to disprove an admission in his pleadings without withdrawing it from the record. *Florida Yellow Pine Co. v. Flint River Naval Stores Co.,*140 Ga. 321 (2) (78 SE 900). Although the defendant did, in answering Paragraph 5 which contained a reiteration of the allegation of the indebtedness and the amounts of each item thereof, deny all indebtedness, where the answer contains both an admission and a denial, the admission must control. *City of Moultrie v. Schofield’s Sons Co.,*6 Ga. App. 464, 468 (65 SE 315); *Ford v. Serenado Mfg. Co.,*27 Ga. App. 535 (2) (109 SE 415); *King v. Loeb,*93 Ga. App. 301, 305 (91 SE2d 532); *Williams Mfg. Co. v. Warner Sugar Ref. Co.,*125 Ga. 408, 411 (54 SE 95).

For both these reasons there was no error in denying the defendant’s motions for summary judgment, new trial, and judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3059

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 304 West Michigan Street in Stuttgart, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Lloyd L. Burke Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3059 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 304 West Michigan Street in Stuttgart, Arkan4 sas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lloyd L. 

5 Burke Post Office’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Lloyd L. Burke Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.