alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 331.1 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* The regulations in this part are issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) under sections 9(a)(Tenth) and 10(g) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act), 12 U.S.C. 1819(a)(Tenth), 1820(g), to implement sections 24(j) and 27 of the FDI Act, 12 U.S.C. 1831a(j), 1831d, and related provisions of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980, Public Law 96-221, 94 Stat. 132 (1980).
( b ) *Purpose.* Section 24(j) of the FDI Act, as amended by the Riegle-Neal Amendments Act of 1997, Public Law 105-24, 111 Stat. 238 (1997), was enacted to maintain parity between State banks and national banks regarding the application of a host State's laws to branches of out-of-State banks. Section 27 of the FDI Act was enacted to provide State banks with interest rate authority similar to that provided to national banks under the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. 85. The regulations in this part clarify that State-chartered banks and insured branches of foreign banks have regulatory authority in these areas parallel to the authority of national banks under regulations issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and address other issues the FDIC considers appropriate to implement these statutes.
( c ) *Scope.* The regulations in this part apply to State-chartered banks and insured branches of foreign banks.
#### §§ 324.125-324.130 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. ss.1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Datascension Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report")"Report"), I, Lou Persico, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Lou PersicoLOU PERSICO

CEO and Prin. Executive OfficerDated: August 16, 2010
# C_2012180EN.01000401.xml

| 21.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/4

---

Opinion of the EFTA Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions concerning a draft preliminary decision relating to Case 59120 — Color Line

13 December 2011

(Second meeting)

2012/C 180/04

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the EFTA Surveillance Authority that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the EFTA Surveillance Authority that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the EFTA Surveillance Authority on the basic amount of the fine. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the EFTA Surveillance Authority on the basic amount of the fine.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the EFTA Surveillance Authority that there are no mitigating or aggravating circumstances to be taken into account. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the EFTA Surveillance Authority that there are no mitigating or aggravating circumstances to be taken into account.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the EFTA Surveillance Authority on the final amount of the fine. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the EFTA Surveillance Authority on the final amount of the fine.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union and the EEA Supplement. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union and the EEA Supplement.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

SCOTT and CINDY ERLER, LLP, SCOTT

ERLER, individually, AND DOES 1-10,

Defendants and Appellees.

Sovven 

Clerk of Greenw000 Supreme State of Courf

Montana

ORDER

Plaintiffs and Appellants Wilkinson, LLC, and Jack Couch have filed a notice of

appeal from the order of the Third Judicial District Court, Cause No. DV-20-18. The appeal

is from an order certified as final by the District Court pursuant to M. R. Civ. P. 54(b).

Pursuant to M. R. App. P. 4(4)(b), we have reviewed the District Court's certification

order for compliance with M. R. App. P. 6(6). We conclude the court's certification order is

in substantial compliance with the requirements of Rule 6(6) and our case law interpreting

certification orders under Rule 54(b).

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that this appeal may proceed.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record.

DATED this day of January, 2021.

Chief Justice
All A4 211,_. 

justices

2
# C_2020265EN.01000201.xml

| 13.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/2

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2020/C 265/02)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 27 April 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85071 |
| Decision No | 043/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title | COVID-19, Start-up Ecosystem Grant Scheme |
| Legal basis | The letter of additional assignment to the budget 2020 from The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries dated 5 April 2020, and the Guidelines for grants to Innovation Environments (MNOK 50) dated 23 April 2020. |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Access to liquidity for start-up ecosystem undertakings facing a sudden shortage of liquidity due to the impact on the economy of the COVID-19 outbreak, by means of directs grants. |
| Form of aid | Grants |
| Budget | Estimated NOK 50 million |
| Duration | 27.4.2020 – 31.12.2020 |
| Economic sectors | Start-up sector |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Innovation Norway |
| Akersgata 13 |
| 0104 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

27 April 2020

Case No

85071

Decision No

043/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title

COVID-19, Start-up Ecosystem Grant Scheme

Legal basis

The letter of additional assignment to the budget 2020 from The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries dated 5 April 2020, and the Guidelines for grants to Innovation Environments (MNOK 50) dated 23 April 2020.

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Access to liquidity for start-up ecosystem undertakings facing a sudden shortage of liquidity due to the impact on the economy of the COVID-19 outbreak, by means of directs grants.

Form of aid

Grants

Budget

Estimated NOK 50 million

Duration

27.4.2020 – 31.12.2020

Economic sectors

Start-up sector

Name and address of the granting authority

Innovation Norway

Akersgata 13

0104 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
EXHIBIT 4.2(a)


AMENDMENT TO 1998 STOCK OPTION PLAN EFFECTIVE MAY 21, 2001

         The first paragraph of existing section 8(h) of the Plan is deleted and
replaced with the following provisions effective May 21, 2001:

         (h)  NONTRANSFERABILITY.  Except  by will or the  laws of  descent  and
distribution, and except for transfers to a Permitted Transferee, no Option, and
no right or interest in any  Incentive  Stock  Option,  shall be  assignable  or
transferable.  Transfers to a Permitted  Transferee  shall be authorized only if
(i) the  transfer is a bona fide gift and not payment of anything to any person,
directly or indirectly; (ii) the Optionee receives nothing of value, directly or
indirectly,  for the gift;  and (iii) the  transferred  Options  continue  to be
subject to the  identical  terms and  conditions  as the  Options  prior to such
transfer.  A Permitted  Transferee means (and shall be limited to) an Optionee's
Family Members: child, stepchild,  grandchild, parent, stepparent,  grandparent,
spouse, former spouse,  sibling,  niece, nephew,  mother-in-law,  father-in-law,
son-in-law,  daughter-in-law,  brother-  or  sister-in-law  (including  adoptive
relationships);  anyone sharing the Optionee's household (but not as a tenant or
employee),  or a trust or other entity in which the Optionee and Family  Members
hold more than 50% of its beneficial or voting interest. It is intended that the
preceding comply with General Instruction  A(1)(a)(5) to Form S-8 adopted by the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

         Approved by the board of directors on May 25, 2001  effective as of the
date first above written.


                                       17

<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2714 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2714

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
               To reauthorize the State Justice Institute.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Justice Institute 
Reauthorization Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 215 of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 
10713) is amended to read as follows:

                    ``Authorization of appropriations

    ``Sec. 215. There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
the purposes of this title, $7,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005, 
2006, 2007, and 2008. Amounts appropriated for each such year are to 
remain available until expended.''.

SEC. 3. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Status of Institute.--Section 205(c) of the State Justice 
Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10704(c)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) The Institute may purchase goods and services from the 
General Services Administration in order to carry out its functions.''.
    (b) Status as Officers and Employees of the United States.--Section 
205(d)(2) of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 
10704(d)(2)) is amended by inserting ``, notwithstanding section 8914 
of such title'' after ``(relating to health insurance)''.
    (c) Meetings.--Section 204(j) of the State Justice Institute Act of 
1984 (42 U.S.C. 10703(j)) is amended by inserting ``(on any occasion on 
which that committee has been delegated the authority to act on behalf 
of the Board)'' after ``executive committee of the Board''.

SEC. 4. LAW ENFORCEMENT ARMOR VESTS.

    Section 1001(a)(23) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3793(a)(23)) is amended by striking 
``2004'' and inserting ``2007''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          426160
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                426160
<PP&E>                                         4668436
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1332355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3762240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           481329
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3246547<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3762240
<SALES>                                         173978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                173978
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                141650
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               65252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (32923)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.51)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Refers to Limited Partner's and General Partner's capital.
<F2>95% Limited Partners - Interest outstanding=20653.69.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 17, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-0411 Lower Tribunal No. F05-5530B

________________ 

### Trevor Lyons, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge. Trevor Lyons, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before SCALES, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Marshall v. State, 421 So. 2d 714, 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
#### § 308.118 Collection of penalties.

The FDIC may collect any civil penalty assessed pursuant to this subpart by agreement with the respondent, or the FDIC may bring an action against the respondent to recover the penalty amount in the appropriate United States district court. All penalties collected under this section shall be paid over to the Treasury of the United States.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.69


                        EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT

          WHEREAS, Incara Pharmaceuticals Corporation (the "Company") and John
P. Richert (the "Employee") entered into an Employment Agreement dated November
16, 1998 (the "Agreement"); and

          WHEREAS, the Agreement provides for the renewal of the Agreement for
one year periods by mutual written agreement;

          WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee wish to amend the Agreement;

          NOW THEREFORE, effective as of May 1, 2001, the parties agree to
extend the term of the Agreement under the same terms and conditions for a one
year period through April 30, 2002. The remainder of the Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as
of May 1, 2001.


INCARA PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION


By:  /s/ Clayton I. Duncan                                 /s/ John P. Richert
     ---------------------------------------               -------------------
Name: Clayton I. Duncan                                    JOHN P. RICHERT
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60778 Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
MALCOLM HARTZOG, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:95-CR-3-PS

- - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Malcolm Hartzog appeals his guilty-plea conviction for distribution of cocaine. He argues that the district court erred in increasing his base offense level by two points under U.S.S.G.

§ 3B1.1(c) for his role in the offense, and his rights under the
Double Jeopardy Clause were violated in the computation of his
criminal history category under § 4A1. 1 and the civil forfeiture2

proceeding. We review these issues under the plain error standard
because Hartzog raises these grounds for the first time on appeal.

See United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)
(en banc), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995). Hartzog has not demonstrated any error, plain or otherwise.
Hartzog has not carried his burden of showing that the district

court considered unreliable information in imposing sentence.
Further, he d id not object, but agreed to the Government's stipulation that a two-level increase for his role in the offense

was appropriate. U nited States v. Angulo , 927 F.2d 202, 2105 (5th
Cir. 1991); United States v. Branch , 46 F.3d 440, 442 (5th Cir.
1995). Hartzog has not shown an error in the computation of his
criminal history category. The sentencing court did not impose
greater punishment u nder the guidelines than Congress intended.

See U nited States v. Bigelow , 897 F.2d 160, 161 (5th Cir. 1990) (citing inter alia Albernaz v. United States , 450 U.S. 333, 343-44
(1981)). Moreover, Hartzog has not provided any portion of the
record of the forfeiture proceeding to support a review of his double jeopardy argument. See United States v. Gonzalez , 76 F.3d 1339, 1342 (5th Cir. 1996); Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2), 11(a).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                               JOINDER AGREEMENT
                               -----------------

     The undersigned is executing and delivering this Joinder Agreement pursuant
to an agreement between the undersigned and SkyAuction.com, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company") to purchase from the Company _______ Series A
Preferred Stock at a price per share of $71.84, for an aggregate consideration
of $____.

1.   By executing this Joinder Agreement, the undersigned hereby agrees to
become a party to, to be bound by, and to comply with the provisions of the
Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated March 17, 2000, executed by
and among the Company and the Investors named therein (the "Stock Purchase
Aareement"), as if the undersigned was an original Investor party to the Stock
Purchase Agreement. The undersigned hereby ratifies, as of the date hereof, all
representations and warranties and agrees to be bound by, all provisions
applicable to Investors contained in the Stock Purchase Agreement.

2.   By executing this Joinder Agreement, the undersigned hereby agrees to
become a party to, to be bound by, and to comply with the provisions of the
Stockholders' Agreement, dated March 17, 2000, executed by and among the Company
and the stockholders named therein (the "Stockholders' Agreement") as if the
undersigned was an original Stockholder party to the Stockholders' Agreement.
The undersigned hereby agrees to be bound by all provisions of the Stockholders'
Agreement.

3.   By executing this Joinder Agreement, the undersigned hereby agrees to
become a party to, to be bound by, and to comply with the provisions of the
Investors' Rights Agreement, dated March 17, 2000, executed by and among the
Company and the Investors named therein (the "Investors' Rights Agreement"), as
if the undersigned was an original Investor party to the Investors' Rights
Agreement. The undersigned hereby agrees to be bound by all provisions of the
Investors' Rights Agreement.

4.   The undersigned acknowledges and confirms that it has received a copy of
the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Stockholders' Agreement and the Investors'
Rights Agreement and all exhibits and schedules thereto. This Agreement will
become effective upon its execution by both parties.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Joinder Agreement as of
the ______ day of March, 2000.


--------------------------------




ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

SKY AUCTION.COM, INC.

By:
   ---------------------------------
Name:
     -------------------------------
Title:
      ------------------------------
# C_2021396EN.01000901.xml

| 30.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 396/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 396/9

---

EFTA Surveillance Authority communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(2021/C 396/09)

| Member State | Iceland |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Flight routes:






  1. | Akureyri – Grímsey – Akureyri |

Member State

Iceland

Concerned routes

Flight routes:

1.

Akureyri – Grímsey – Akureyri

| 2. | Akureyri – Vopnafjörður – Þórshöfn – Akureyri |
| --- | --- |

2.

Akureyri – Vopnafjörður – Þórshöfn – Akureyri

Period of validity of the contract

1 April 2022 – 31 March 2025 with a possibility of two years extension

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months from the publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained

| Vegagerðin |
| --- |
| Suðurhrauni 3 |
| 210 Garðabæ |
| IS-ICELAND |

Vegagerðin

Suðurhrauni 3

210 Garðabæ

IS-ICELAND

Contact: Ólafur Þór Leifsson

Email: othl@vegagerdin.is

tel. +354 8921516

https://tendsign.is/

| — | Nr.21-058 Áætlunarflug á Íslandi - Sérleyfi í flugi fyrir Vegagerðina |
| --- | --- |

—

Nr.21-058 Áætlunarflug á Íslandi - Sérleyfi í flugi fyrir Vegagerðina

| — | No.21-058 Scheduled Air Service in Iceland – Concession in Air routes for Vegagerdin/The Icelandic Road and Coastal Administration (IRCA) |
| --- | --- |

—

No.21-058 Scheduled Air Service in Iceland – Concession in Air routes for Vegagerdin/The Icelandic Road and Coastal Administration (IRCA)

---
PMN: 14

- 0173 0174, 0175, 0176, 0177