alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5



<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          582,381
<SECURITIES>                                    3,581
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,287,860
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,878,822
<PP&E>                                          74,222
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4,109,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           173,535
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        3,310
<OTHER-SE>                                      3,932,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,109,704
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                0
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   152,125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (146,053)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (6,700,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,706,072)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,706,072)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,706,072)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.03)


</TABLE>
§ 349.7 Segregation of collateral. ( a ) A covered swap entity that posts any collateral other than for variation margin with respect to a non-cleared swap or a non-cleared security-based swap shall require that all funds or other property other than variation margin provided by the covered swap entity be held by one or more custodians that are not the covered swap entity or counterparty and not affiliates of the covered swap entity or the counterparty.
( b ) A covered swap entity that collects initial margin required by § 349.3(a) with respect to a non-cleared swap or a non-cleared security-based swap shall require that such initial margin be held by one or more custodians that are not the covered swap entity or counterparty and not affiliates of the covered swap entity or the counterparty.
( c ) For purposes of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the custodian must act pursuant to a custody agreement that: ( 1 ) Prohibits the custodian from rehypothecating, repledging, reusing, or otherwise transferring (through securities lending, securities borrowing, repurchase agreement, reverse repurchase agreement or other means) the collateral held by the custodian, except that cash collateral may be held in a general deposit account with the custodian if the funds in the account are used to purchase an asset described in § 349.6(a)(2) or (b), such asset is held in compliance with this § 349.7, and such purchase takes place within a time period reasonably necessary to consummate such purchase after the cash collateral is posted as initial margin; and
( 2 ) Is a legal, valid, binding, and enforceable agreement under the laws of all relevant jurisdictions, including in the event of bankruptcy, insolvency, or a similar proceeding.
( d ) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(1) of this section, a custody agreement may permit the posting party to substitute or direct any reinvestment of posted collateral held by the custodian, provided that, with respect to collateral collected by a covered swap entity pursuant to § 349.3(a) or posted by a covered swap entity pursuant to § 349.3(b), the agreement requires the posting party to: ( 1 ) Substitute only funds or other property that would qualify as eligible collateral under § 349.6, and for which the amount net of applicable discounts described in appendix B of this subpart would be sufficient to meet the requirements of § 349.3; and
( 2 ) Direct reinvestment of funds only in assets that would qualify as eligible collateral under § 349.6, and for which the amount net of applicable discounts described in appendix B of this subpart would be sufficient to meet the requirements of § 349.3.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I**,**Bill D. Stewart, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form l0-Q of Naturade, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 15, 2005         */s/*Bill D. Stewart        Bill D. Stewart        *Chief Executive Officer*  
34
#### STATE ex rel. REBECCA RICKART, Relator, v. WILLIAM M. KINSEY, Judge, Respondent.

St. Louis Court of Appeals.

Argued and Submitted November 15, 1912.

Opinion Filed December 3, 1912.

MANDAMUS: Habeas Corpus: Refusal of Court to Proceed with Trial. A circuit court, issuing a writ of *habeas corpus*and refusing to proceed further under it, will he required by mandamus to proceed with the trial and determination of the issues presented.

Original Proceeding by Mandamus.

Writ made peremptory.

*Frank X. Hiemeng*for relator.'

Mandamus will lie to compel an inferior court to hear and determine a writ of *habeas corpus,*after the. issuance of the writ. Ex parte Malone, 30 Ala. 49; Ex parte Jones, 94 Ala. 34; Ex parte Charleston, 107 Ala. .689; High’s Extraordinary Legal Eemedies,- sec. 266, p. 258.

*462J. *D. Johnson*and *Loomis G. Johnson*for respondent.

REYNOLDS, P. J.

This is an original proceeding to compel respondent, as judge of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, presiding’ in Division No. 7 thereof, to hear and proceed to judgment in an application under the *habeas corpus*act, the relator herd being the relator in the application for *habeas corpus,*one L. B. Tebbetts and others being the respondents in that proceeding. It appears that on the application of Rebecca Rickart, as guardian of two of the minor children of of Ellen M. Breck, deceased, a writ of *habeas corpus*was issued against Mr. Tebbetts, commanding him to produce these minor children in court and turn them over to the custody of Mrs. Rebecca Rickart. Issuing the writ, when it came on for hearing, the “honorable circuit judge refused to proceed further with it, assigning as his ground for .refusal that there was pending in the St. Louis Court of Appeals the case of State ex rel. Tebbetts against the Honorable Charles W. Holtcamp, as judge of the probate court of the city of St. Louis, that case having been appealed from the decision of the circuit court, and that until the determination of that case he would not-proceed with the hearing or determination of the *habeas corpus.*We have, at this session, by judgment entered, affirmed the action of, the circuit court in refusing to set aside that of the probate court, ánd as the pendency of this cause was the sole ground of refusal of action by the circuit judge, and as that obstacle has been removed by our decision, the objection of the honorable circuit judge to proceed with the *habeas corpus*is removed. Hence we do not consider it necessary to enter into any examination or determination of the points presented by counsel as reasons why the *habeas corpus*matter should not have been suspended notwithstanding the appeal. We assume that the learned circuit *463judge will now proceed to the determination of the *habeas corpus.*To the end, however, that the .record may be in proper form, it is ordered that the alternative writ of mandamus heretofore issued in this cause be and it is hereby made absolute.

*Nortoni*and *Caulfield, JJ.,*concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2



                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION


I, Robert C. Larry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metal Management, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



Date:  October 29, 2004                        /s/ Robert C. Larry
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Robert C. Larry
                                               Executive Vice President, Finance
                                               and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 602.9 Current FOIA index.

FCA will make a current index available for public inspection and copying, as required by the FOIA. We will give you an index for the cost of copying it. Because we rarely receive requests for an index, we have not published one in the Federal Register.
§ 309.2 Definitions. For purposes of this part: ( a ) The term *depository institution,* as used in § 309.6, includes depository institutions that have applied to the Corporation for federal deposit insurance, closed depository institutions, presently operating federally insured depository institutions, foreign banks, branches of foreign banks, and all affiliates of any of the foregoing.
( b ) The terms *Corporation* or *FDIC* mean the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
( c ) The words *disclose* or *disclosure,* as used in § 309.6, mean to give access to a record, whether by producing the written record or by oral discussion of its contents. Where the Corporation employee authorized to release Corporation documents makes a determination that furnishing copies of the documents is necessary, the words *disclose* or *disclosure* include the furnishing of copies of documents or records. In addition, *disclose* or *disclosure* as used in § 309.6 is synonymous with the term *transfer* as used in the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3401 *et seq.*).
( d ) The term *examination* includes, but is not limited to, formal and informal investigations of irregularities involving suspected violations of federal or state civil or criminal laws, or unsafe and unsound practices as well as such other investigations as may be conducted pursuant to law.
( e ) The term *record* means: ( 1 ) Any information that would be an agency record subject to the requirements of this section when maintained by the FDIC in any format, including an electronic format; and
( 2 ) Any information described under paragraph (e)(1) of this section that is maintained for the FDIC by an entity under Government contract, for purposes of records management.
( f ) The term *report of examination* includes, but is not limited to, examination reports resulting from examinations of depository institutions conducted jointly by Corporation examiners and state banking authority examiners or other federal financial institution examiners, as well as reports resulting from examinations conducted solely by Corporation examiners. The term also includes compliance examination reports.
( g ) The term *customer financial records,* as used in § 309.6, means an original of, a copy of, or information known to have been derived from, any record held by a depository institution pertaining to a customer's relationship with the depository institution but does not include any record that contains information not identified with or identifiable as being derived from the financial records of a particular customer. The term *customer* as used in § 309.6 refers to individuals or partnerships of five or fewer persons.
( h ) The term *Director of the Division having primary authority* includes Deputies to the Chairman and directors of FDIC Divisions and Offices that create, maintain custody, or otherwise have primary responsibility for the handling of FDIC records or information.
[60 FR 61465, Nov. 30, 1995, as amended at 63 FR 16404, Apr. 3, 1998; 81 FR 83646, Nov. 22, 2016]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<CAPTION>
             CANTERBURY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.- FORM 10-Q
                          FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                                May 31,1998
</CAPTION>
<ARTICLE>                5
<CIK>                    0000794927
<NAME>                   CANTERBURY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
<CURRENCY>               0
<MULTIPLIER>             1
          
<S>                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                   MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<CASH>                               119,860
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      1,557,625
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   6,105,930
<PP&E>                             6,103,170
<DEPRECIATION>                     3,682,806
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    25,671,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              2,433,136
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                               6,068
<OTHER-SE>                        16,051,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      25,671,891
<SALES>                            6,221,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   6,221,450
<CGS>                              3,156,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      2,949,255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    (602,831)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   196,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      521,664
<INCOME-TAX>                         130,416
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  391,248
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         391,248
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.07
        


</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3162

To require cigarette products to be placed under or behind the counter 

in retail sales. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To require cigarette products to be placed under or behind 

the counter in retail sales.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RETAIL SALES OF CIGARETTE PRODUCTS. 

4 (a) PRODUCT PLACEMENT.—Any person engaged in 

5 the retail sales of cigarette products shall place such prod6 ucts under or behind a counter and not out on the floor 

7 of the retail sales facility. 

8 (b) PENALTY.—A person who violates subsection (a) 

9 shall be considered to have engaged in a deceptive act or 
2

•HR 3162 IH 

1 practice in violation of section 5 of the Federal Trade 

2 Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45).

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from the
March  31,  1997  financial  statements  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000795445
<NAME>             ADVANCED MACHINE VISION CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2710
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4931
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       8479
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 16750
<PP&E>                                            7877
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   32060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10123
<BONDS>                                          14551
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         25986
<OTHER-SE>                                      (18600)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     32060
<SALES>                                           9337
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  9337
<CGS>                                             4730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 360
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    801
<INCOME-TAX>                                        32
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                769
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       769
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Theragenics Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 4, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Francis J. Tarallo, Chief
Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the Report.




Date: November 13, 2009
By:
/s/ Francis J. TaralloFrancis J. TaralloChief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Theragenics Corporation and will be retained by Theragenics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.