alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 09, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 09, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0454. ERIC LUKE v. BURKE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2013V0012
# C_2023324EN.01001601.xml

| 14.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 324/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 324/16

---

No state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

(2023/C 324/09)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 3 May 2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 90153 |
| Decision No | 067/23/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Organisation of municipal digitalisation services/solutions |
| Form of aid | No aid |

Date of adoption of the decision

3 May 2023

Case No

90153

Decision No

067/23/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Organisation of municipal digitalisation services/solutions

Form of aid

No aid

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
428 A.2d 591

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, v. Ricardo BELL, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued June 13, 1980.

Filed April 3, 1981.

Almanina Barbour, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Eric B. Henson, Asst. Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, for Commonwealth, appellee.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted at Nos. 1476,1477,1479, and 1481 August Term, 1977. The lower court imposed sentence on each. At No. 1481 August Term, 1977, the court imposed the following sentence:

> “not less than two and one half (21/2) years nor more than five (5) years in the State Correctional Institution at Graterford, to run concurrent with sentence imposed on Bills #1476 and 1480.”

Because appellant was not convicted on No. 1480 August Term, 1977, it was inappropriate for the lower court to enter the above-quoted sentence. Accordingly, we modify the sentence on No. 1481 to run concurrently with the sentence imposed on No. 1476 August Term, 1977. The balance of appellant’s sentence is undisturbed.

Judgment of sentence, as modified, is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000793986
<NAME> JustWebIt.com, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          44,631
<SECURITIES>                                    25,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,870
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,226
<PP&E>                                          28,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,095)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 258,790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          371,489
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,644
<OTHER-SE>                                   (117,343)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   258,790
<SALES>                                          9,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,636
<CGS>                                            2,332
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  230,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             131,938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,228
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,228
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,228
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
§ 303.101 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: ( a ) *Director* means a person who serves on the board of directors or board of trustees of an FDIC-supervised institution, except that this term does not include an advisory director who: ( 1 ) Is not elected by the shareholders;
( 2 ) Is not authorized to vote on any matters before the board of directors or board of trustees or any committee thereof;
( 3 ) Solely provides general policy advice to the board of directors or board of trustees and any committee thereof; and
( 4 ) Has not been identified by the FDIC as a person who performs the functions of a director for purposes of this subpart.
( b ) *Senior executive officer* means a person who holds the title of president, chief executive officer, chief operating officer, chief managing official (in an insured state branch of a foreign bank), chief financial officer, chief lending officer, chief investment officer, or, without regard to title, salary, or compensation, performs the function of one or more of these positions. *Senior executive officer* also includes any other person identified by the FDIC, whether or not hired as an employee, with significant influence over, or who participates in, major policymaking decisions of the FDIC-supervised institution.
( c ) *Troubled condition* means any FDIC-supervised institution that: ( 1 ) Has a composite rating, as determined in its most recent report of examination, of 4 or 5 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (UFIRS), or in the case of an insured state branch of a foreign bank, an equivalent rating; or
( 2 ) Is subject to a proceeding initiated by the FDIC for termination or suspension of deposit insurance; or
( 3 ) Is subject to a cease-and-desist order or written agreement issued by either the FDIC or the appropriate state banking authority that requires action to improve the financial condition of the FDIC-supervised institution or is subject to a proceeding initiated by the FDIC or state authority which contemplates the issuance of an order that requires action to improve the financial condition of the FDIC-supervised institution, unless otherwise informed in writing by the FDIC; or
( 4 ) Is informed in writing by the FDIC that it is in troubled condition for purposes of the requirements of this subpart on the basis of the FDIC-supervised institution's most recent report of condition or report of examination, or other information available to the FDIC.
( d ) *FDIC-supervised institution* means any entity for which the FDIC is the appropriate Federal banking agency pursuant to section 3(q) of the FDI Act, 12 U.S.C. 1813(q).
[67 FR 79247, Dec. 27, 2002, as amended at 85 FR 3244, Jan. 21, 2020]
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **
| **Certification of CEO and CFO**                  |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| **Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**           |
| **As Adopted Pursuant to**                        |
| **Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002** |

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Davidson Growth Plus, L.P. (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
|   |       /s/Steven D. Cordes |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Steven D. Cordes                             |
|   | Date: August 12, 2009                              |
|   |                                               |
|   |      /s/Stephen B. Waters |
|   | Name: Stephen B. Waters                            |
|   | Date: August 12, 2009                              |

 

 

This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Harry H. Jackson et al., Appellants, *v.*Henry Klinger et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, second district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the defendants.

Joseph A. Kent, for appellants.

David K. Case, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

There was evidence tending to show that the defendant Chapman was the mere agent for others in making the purchase, and that he had no property in or control over the articles in question. Upon this view of the evidence, which we must assume was taken by the trial justice, there was no conversion established against such defendant, and as to him the dismissal of the complaint was right. So far as the defendant Klinger is concerned, we think there is clear evidence of a demand sufficient to sustain a judgment for conversion, assuming that the plaintiffs had established a right of property in the articles in question. This, we think, was done. Said articles were in the house when it was let by the plaintiffs to Mary Braendly, and formed a part of the premises demised. It is claimed that said fixtures were put in by a previous tenant, and an attempt was *759made to show a transmission of title from him to others, but the evidence on that point is very vague and unsatisfactory. What does appear is that the former tenants left the property and never undertook to remove said fixtures, which thus apparently became the property of the landlord. The demand upon the defendant Klinger was abundantly proven. The point made that the judgment against the defendant Klinger recovered on the first trial of this cause was not reversed, and must, therefore, stand, because he did not appeal therefrom, is untenable. The plaintiffs should have made it below and should have objected to any participation by said defendant in the new trial. This they did not do, and they must be deemed to have acquiesced in the construction put by the defendant upon the order of reversal, that it operated upon the judgment with respect to both. It follows that the judgment should be affirmed as to the defendant Chapman, with costs, and as to the defendant Klinger reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, as to the defendant Frank Chapman, and as to the defendant Henry Klinger reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Present: Beekmatt, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gormah, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, as to defendant Chapman, and as to defendant Klinger, reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.
§ 34.21 General rule. ( a ) *Authorization.* A national bank and its subsidiaries may make, sell, purchase, participate in, or otherwise deal in ARM loans and interests therein without regard to any State law limitations on those activities.
( b ) *Purchase of loans not in compliance.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, a national bank may purchase or participate in ARM loans that were not made in accordance with this part, provided such purchases are consistent with safe and sound banking practices as described in published OCC guidance, including appropriate diligence regarding the quality and characteristics of the loans, and other applicable regulations.
( c ) *Purchase of loans from a subsidiary or affiliate.* ARM loans purchased, in whole or in part, from a subsidiary or affiliate must comply with this part and with other applicable regulations, and be consistent with safe and sound banking practices as described in published OCC guidance, including appropriate diligence regarding the quality and characteristics of the loans. For purposes of this paragraph, the terms affiliate and subsidiary have the same meaning as in 12 U.S.C. 371c.
[61 FR 11300, Mar. 20, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 22251, Apr. 24, 2008]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EDWARD J. O'BRIEN, III,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 63 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EDWARD J. O'BRIEN, III,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 64 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of May, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# C_2021457EN.01000801.xml

| 11.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 457/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 457/8

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 457/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 6.7.2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 87067 |
| Decision No | 200/21/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 Compensation scheme for operators of year-round, commercial, long-distance scheduled bus or passenger boat services |
| Legal basis | The regulation on a temporary compensation scheme for operators of commercial bus and passenger boat routes with a loss in turnover caused by the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Compensation for loss incurred by Covid-19 outbreak and the infection control measures implemented by the Norwegian authorities, to ensure the continuity of year-round, commercial, long-distance bus and passenger boat services that do not receive compensation from local or other public authorities for public services obligation |
| Form of aid | Direct grants |
| Budget | NOK 300 million |
| Intensity | 80 % |
| Duration | 6.7.2021 – 31.12.2021 |
| Economic sectors | Land and sea transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Norwegian Railway Directorate
  Jernbanedirektoratet
  Postboks 16 Sentrum
  N-0101 Oslo
  NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

6.7.2021

Case No

87067

Decision No

200/21/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 Compensation scheme for operators of year-round, commercial, long-distance scheduled bus or passenger boat services

Legal basis

The regulation on a temporary compensation scheme for operators of commercial bus and passenger boat routes with a loss in turnover caused by the COVID-19 outbreak

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Compensation for loss incurred by Covid-19 outbreak and the infection control measures implemented by the Norwegian authorities, to ensure the continuity of year-round, commercial, long-distance bus and passenger boat services that do not receive compensation from local or other public authorities for public services obligation

Form of aid

Direct grants

Budget

NOK 300 million

Intensity

80 %

Duration

6.7.2021 – 31.12.2021

Economic sectors

Land and sea transport

Name and address of the granting authority

The Norwegian Railway Directorate

Jernbanedirektoratet

Postboks 16 Sentrum

N-0101 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
# C_2023295EN.01000501.xml

| 21.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/5

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2023/C 295/05)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Ireland

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Ireland

Subject of commemoration: the 50th anniversary of Ireland’s membership of the European Union

Description of the design: The design depicts a modification to the ‘EU50’ programme logo used by Government Departments to promote events marking the 50th anniversary of Ireland’s EU membership. The name of the issuing country ‘ÉIRE’ is inserted above the logo. The year ‘1973’ is referenced to recognise the year Ireland joined the EU as well as ‘2023’ to mark the coin issue year.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 500 000

Date of issue: July 2023

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
# Publicatieblad C 363I/9 se

| | ISSN 1977-0995 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 363I |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 64e jaargang9 september 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0995

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 363I

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

64e jaargang9 september 2021

---

| Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- |
| | Rectificaties |
| 2021/C 363 I/01 | Rectificatie van de oproep tot het indienen van sollicitaties voor de functie van toezichthouder op de procedurewaarborgen in het kader van onderzoeken door het Europees Bureau voor fraudebestrijding (OLAF) — COM/2021/20062 ( PB C 279 A van 13.7.2021 ) | 1 |

Inhoud

Bladzijde

Rectificaties

2021/C 363 I/01

Rectificatie van de oproep tot het indienen van sollicitaties voor de functie van toezichthouder op de procedurewaarborgen in het kader van onderzoeken door het Europees Bureau voor fraudebestrijding (OLAF) — COM/2021/20062 ( PB C 279 A van 13.7.2021 )

( PB C 279 A van 13.7.2021 )

1

---

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

Rectificaties

| 9.9.2021 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | CI 363/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2021

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

CI 363/1

---

Rectificatie van de oproep tot het indienen van sollicitaties voor de functie van toezichthouder op de procedurewaarborgen in het kader van onderzoeken door het Europees Bureau voor fraudebestrijding (OLAF) — COM/2021/20062

(
  Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie C 279 A van 13 juli 2021
  )

(2021/C 363 I/01)

Bladzijde 3, punt 4, onder “Uiterste datum voor inschrijving”, eerste alinea:

| in plaats van: | “De uiterste datum voor het indienen van een sollicitatie is 9 september 2021. De online-inschrijving wordt afgesloten om 12.00 uur ’s middags, Brusselse tijd.”, |
| --- | --- |

in plaats van:

“De uiterste datum voor het indienen van een sollicitatie is 9 september 2021. De online-inschrijving wordt afgesloten om 12.00 uur ’s middags, Brusselse tijd.”,

| lezen: | “De uiterste datum voor het indienen van een sollicitatie is 23 september 2021. De online-inschrijving wordt afgesloten om 12.00 uur ’s middags, Brusselse tijd.”. |
| --- | --- |

lezen:

lezen:

“De uiterste datum voor het indienen van een sollicitatie is 23 september 2021. De online-inschrijving wordt afgesloten om 12.00 uur ’s middags, Brusselse tijd.”.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3175 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 3175

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 2650 Cleveland Avenue, NW in Canton, Ohio, as the ``Richard D. 
                    Watkins Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2650 
Cleveland Avenue, NW in Canton, Ohio, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Richard D. Watkins Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Richard D. Watkins Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 28, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```