alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 195 (Friday, October 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 52276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24418]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11868 and <greek-i>11869]


New York Disaster <greek-i>NY-00079

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New York 
(FEMA-1857-DR), dated 09/01/2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 08/08/2009 through 08/10/2009.

DATES: Effective Date: 09/29/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/02/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/01/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of New 
York, dated 09/01/2009, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.
Primary Counties: Allegany.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-24418 Filed 10-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3149 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3149

  To ensure that members of the Armed Forces serving in a combat zone 
designated for Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom do 
  not experience a reduction in the total monthly rate of combat zone-
      related special pay and allowances after September 30, 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 23, 2003

 Mr. Janklow introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To ensure that members of the Armed Forces serving in a combat zone 
designated for Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom do 
  not experience a reduction in the total monthly rate of combat zone-
      related special pay and allowances after September 30, 2003.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Combat Pay Safeguard Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. CONTINUATION OF MONTHLY RATE OF COMBAT ZONE-RELATED SPECIAL PAY 
              AND ALLOWANCES AFTER FISCAL YEAR 2003.

    (a) No Reduction in Total Monthly Rate.--The total monthly rate for 
all combat zone-related special pay and allowances available after 
September 30, 2003, for members of the Armed Forces serving in a combat 
zone designated for Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring 
Freedom shall be at least equal to the total monthly rate for those 
combat zone-related pay and allowances in effect for September 2003.
    (b) Combat Zone-Related Special Pay and Allowances.--In this 
section, the term ``combat zone-related pay and allowances'' refers to 
the following special pays and allowances:
            (1) Hardship duty pay under section 305 of title 37, United 
        States Code.
            (2) Special pay for duty subject to hostile fire or 
        imminent danger under section 310 of such title.
            (3) Family separation allowance under section 427 of such 
        title.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epolin, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31,  2005,  as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, that:

      (1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and

      (2)   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated: July 5, 2005               By: /s/ Murray S. Cohen
                                      Murray S. Cohen,
                                      Chairman of the Board and
                                      Chief Executive Officer


Dated: July 5, 2005               By: /s/ James Ivchenko
                                     James Ivchenko,
                                     President (Principal Financial
                                     Officer)
From: "Terry Schimmel (Bricks

- Phenix City)" <Terry.Schimmel@boral.com>

Sent: 08/13/2008 05:28 PM To: Jeff Telander/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Subject: Boral MACT ICR Jeff, Attached please find an electronic copy of Boral’s completed ICR. Please note that the facility HAP classifications listed on FORM A are based on their current status. We will likely be reviewing the status of each facility in the coming years. You will note that two of our facilities were not operated last year These i dled kilns remain functional and will be restarted when warranted. In addition, many of our kilns were not operated the entire year of 2007. I wish business conditions were better as so far it looks like our capacity utilization for 2008 is shaping up to b e worse than 2007. Projections into the future look like several more years of hard times with expectation that demand may never get back to 2006 levels. While year

- round operation is typical for our industry, we have been impacted by the tough economic co nditions of the past few years- and expect that this will continue for some time. This non -continuous operation obviously increases the cost of the control per ton of bricks produced, while also reducing the total profit that our company makes. We are inte rested in working with you and your economics lead (Tom Walton) to ensure that these conditions are included in your assessment of the impacts of any future rulemaking. The non

-continuous operation of our kilns and associated controls also creates addition al maintenance and operating burdens. These additional activities are needed to ensure that the lime/limestone in our control devices are not permanently corrupted as the temperature within the chamber drops

- and moisture from the atmosphere is introduced. The throughputs/capacities listed on FORM B are based on yearly average throughputs. As we discussed during the site visits, the "capacity" of a brick kiln is not generally a stagnant number. We believe that you should not consider the "9.9" tph capacitie s when evaluating the control level at various sizes. These limits are not attributable to anything except the now vacated MACT. We are submitting FORM F under the CBI procedures you outlined. We are also mailing you the test reports listed via FedEx. Plea se feel free to call me regarding the information on this submission or anything we may have missed. It’s a pretty big task to complete this thing with as many plants as we have and I’m sure we may have missed something. Also in my capacity as the MACT Tas k Force lead person just let me know when and how we can help you all in ciphering through some of this information. Some of the questions have required some interpretation and everyone may not have understood what was being asked quite the same. We look forward to working with you and all your people on the rule making. Thanks, Terry (See attached file: Brick ICR

- Boral

- FINAL.xls )
42424.

#### CITIZENS BANK OF HAPEVILLE v. STERLING.

Hall, Judge.

After extensive litigation in which the following transactions were alleged, the defendant bank appeals to this court, enumerating as error the trial court’s overruling of its renewed general demurrer to the cross action against it and the denial of its motion for summary judgment on this cross action.

One of the original defendants, Sterling, executed to Stovall, the original plaintiff, a note and security deed, which deed was subordinate to a security deed covering the same real estate to the Citizens Bank of Hapeville (hereinafter called the bank). Stovall sued Sterling and Holland for the proceeds of sale allegedly remaining after foreclosure and sale of the property by Holland for the holder of the first security deed, alleging that Holland wrongfully withheld these proceeds from Stovall. To this action Sterling filed a cross action in which he sought to make the bank and Central Builders Supply Co., Inc., transferee of the bank, parties defendant. In the cross action Sterling alleged that Stovall had contracted to build a building for Sterling on property owned by Sterling; that Holland acted as Sterling’s attorney in drawing the contract with Stovall, that Holland acted as attorney for Sterling and as agent for the bank in obtaining a $2,500 building loan from the bank for Sterling, for which Sterling gave the bank the note and security deed covering the real estate; that the bank transferred the note and security deed to Central Builders, purportedly to secure an open account owed by Stovall to Central Builders, and that Holland acted as attorney for Central Builders and as agent of the bank in this transfer; that Holland acted as the bank’s agent and as attorney for Central Builders in the alleged foreclosure proceedings; that the bank without authority *104paid to Stovall the amount of money that Sterling was being charged with in Stovall’s suit; that Stovall had failed to perform his obligation under the building contract; and that the bank jointly with Stovall, Holland and Central Builders had caused Sterling to lose his property and business and wilfully and wantonly injured and damaged him. *Held:*

*Deen and Quillian, JJ., concur.*

Submitted November 7, 1966

Decided January 26, 1967.

*Preston L. Holland, Thomason & Bice, Alfred A. Bice,*for appellant.

*William T. Brooks,*for appellee.

The court has been unable to identify or adjudge any cause of action against the bank from these allegations. When the court called upon counsel for briefs to illuminate the claimed right of recovery against the bank, the contention was made that the bank through “double dealing” of its agent defrauded Sterling and caused him to lose his business and property, with no citation of supporting authority. We hold that the trial court erred in overruling the bank’s general demurrer to the cross action, which was renewed independently of the other defendants, and that proceedings against the bank thereafter were nugatory.

*Judgment reversed.*
§ 366.6 How is my ownership or control determined? ( a ) Your ownership or control is determined on a case-by-case basis. Your ownership or control depends on the specific facts of your situation and the particular industry and legal entity involved. You must provide documentation to us to use in determining your ownership or control.
( b ) The interest of a spouse or other family member in the same organization is imputed to you in determining your ownership or control.
( c ) The following are examples of when your ownership or control may or may not exist. These examples are not inclusive. ( 1 ) You have control if you are the president or chief executive officer of an organization.
( 2 ) You have ownership or control if you are a partner in a small law firm. You might not have ownership or control if you are a partner in a large national law firm.
( 3 ) You have control if you are a general partner of a limited partnership. You have ownership or control if you have a limited partnership interest of 25 percent or more.
( 4 ) You have ownership or control if you have the: ( i ) Power to vote, directly or indirectly, 25% or more interest of any class of voting stock of a company;
( ii ) Ability to direct in any manner the election of a majority of a company's directors or trustees; or
( iii ) Ability to exercise a controlling influence over the company's management and policies.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the matter of P.Z.E., a juvenile, * From the County Court at Law

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. J07444.

No. 11-23-00229-CV * February 15, 2024

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3232 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>

<DOC>
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3232

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To reauthorize certain school lunch and child nutrition programs 
                        through March 31, 2004.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Exclusion of Certain Military Housing Allowances.--Section 
9(b)(7) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 
1758(b)(7)) is amended by inserting ``and through March 31, 2004'' 
after ``and 2003''.
    (b) Child and Adult Care Food Program.--Section 17(a)(2)(B)(i) of 
the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 
1766(a)(2)(B)(i)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 2003'' and 
inserting ``March 31, 2004''.
    (c) Reimbursement to States Under Commodity Distribution 
Programs.--Section 15(e) of the Commodity Distribution Reform Act and 
WIC Amendments of 1987 (7 U.S.C. 612c note; Public Law 100-237) is 
amended by striking ``October 1, 2003'' and inserting ``April 1, 
2004''.
    (d) Funding Maintenance of Commodity Distribution Programs.--
Section 14(a) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 
U.S.C. 1762a(a)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 2003'' and 
inserting ``March 31, 2004''.
    (e) Summer Food Service Program for Children.--
            (1) Section 13(q) of the Richard B. Russell National School 
        Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1761(q)) is amended by striking ``the 
        fiscal year beginning'' and all that follows through ``October 
        1, 2003'' and inserting ``the period beginning October 1, 1977, 
        and ending March 31, 2004''.
            (2) Section 18(f)(2) of the Richard B. Russell National 
        School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1769(f)(2)) is amended by striking 
        ``of fiscal years 2001 through 2003'' and inserting ``beginning 
        October 1, 2000, and ending March 31, 2004''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 28, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### §§ 324.64-324.99 [Reserved]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3278

To permit statues honoring citizens of the District of Columbia to be placed 

in Statuary Hall in the same manner as statues honoring citizens of 

the States are placed in Statuary Hall, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2003

Ms. NORTON (for herself and Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL

To permit statues honoring citizens of the District of Columbia to be placed in Statuary Hall in the same manner 

as statues honoring citizens of the States are placed 

in Statuary Hall, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PLACEMENT OF STATUES OF CITIZENS OF DIS4 TRICT OF COLUMBIA IN STATUARY HALL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1814 of the Revised Stat6 utes (2 U.S.C. 2061) is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following new sentence: ‘‘For purposes of this section, 

8 the term ‘State’ shall include the District of Columbia.’’. 
2

•HR 3278 IH 

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT REGARDING PROCE2 DURES FOR REPLACEMENT OF STATUES.—Section 311 of 

3 the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2001 (2 

4 U.S.C. 2062), is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(f) For purposes of this section—

7 ‘‘(1) the term ‘State’ shall include the District 

8 of Columbia; and 

9 ‘‘(2) in the case of the District of Columbia, the 

10 Council of the District of Columbia shall be treated 

11 as the legislature and the Mayor of the District of 

12 Columbia shall be treated as the Governor.’’.

Æ
§ 34.41 Authority, purpose, and scope. ( a ) *Authority.* This subpart is issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the OCC) under 12 U.S.C. 1, 93a, 1462a, 1463, 1464, 1828(m), 5412(b)(2)(B), and title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA) (Pub. L. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183 (1989)), 12 U.S.C. 3331 *et seq.*
( b ) *Purpose and scope.* ( 1 ) Title XI of FIRREA provides protection for federal financial and public policy interests in real estate-related transactions by requiring real estate appraisals used in connection with federally related transactions to be performed in writing, in accordance with uniform standards, by appraisers whose competency has been demonstrated and whose professional conduct will be subject to effective supervision. This subpart implements the requirements of title XI, and applies to all federally related transactions entered into by the OCC or by institutions regulated by the OCC (*regulated institutions*).
( 2 ) This subpart: ( i ) Identifies which real estate-related financial transactions require the services of an appraiser;
( ii ) Prescribes which categories of federally related transactions shall be appraised by a State certified appraiser and which by a State licensed appraiser; and
( iii ) Prescribes minimum standards for the performance of real estate appraisals in connection with federally related transactions under the jurisdiction of the OCC.
[55 FR 34696, Aug. 24, 1990, as amended at 79 FR 28400, May 16, 2014]
# C_2008297EN.01001301.xml

| 20.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/13

---

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

(2008/C 297/07)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision: | 16 July 2008 |
| --- | --- |
| Case number: | 64738 |
| EFTA State: | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary): | Notified scheme for the grant of a temporary exemption to undertakings entering into an environmental agreement with the Norwegian State relating to reduction of Nitrogen Oxide (‘NOx’) emissions |
| Legal basis: | Article 61(1) EEA, Article 159(c) Environmental Aid Guidelines |
| Type of measure: | Tax exemption |
| Objective: | Environmental agreement aimed at reduction of NOx emissions |
| Form of aid: | Tax exemption |
| Budget: | Maximum EUR 200 million per annum |
| Duration: | 3 years |
| Economic sectors: | Various sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority: | Finance Ministry |
| Akersgata 40 |
| Postboks 8008 Dep. |
| N-0030 Oslo |

Date of adoption of the decision:

Date of adoption of the decision:

16 July 2008

Case number:

Case number:

64738

EFTA State:

EFTA State:

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary):

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary):

Notified scheme for the grant of a temporary exemption to undertakings entering into an environmental agreement with the Norwegian State relating to reduction of Nitrogen Oxide (‘NOx’) emissions

x

Legal basis:

Legal basis:

Article 61(1) EEA, Article 159(c) Environmental Aid Guidelines

Type of measure:

Type of measure:

Tax exemption

Objective:

Objective:

Environmental agreement aimed at reduction of NOx emissions

x

Form of aid:

Form of aid:

Tax exemption

Budget:

Budget:

Maximum EUR 200 million per annum

per annum

Duration:

Duration:

3 years

Economic sectors:

Economic sectors:

Various sectors

Name and address of the granting authority:

Name and address of the granting authority:

Finance Ministry

Akersgata 40

Postboks 8008 Dep.

N-0030 Oslo

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority's website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

---
Chukchi Sea 

Yukon 

River 

Kotzebue

Sound 

Norton Sound 

B r o o k s

R a n g e 

D a l t o n H i gh w ay 

Ca n a d

a 

Un it e d

St a t es 

Beaufort Sea 

Kotzebue 

uvuk Pass 

Calving 

ARCT I C O CE AN Barrow 

Wainwright 

Atqasuk 

Prudhoe Bay 

Nuiqsut

Point Lay 

Summer 

Umiat 

Point Hope 

Anakt

Noatak 

Winter Wiseman 

Ambler Kobuk 

Bettles 

TESHEKPUK LAKE 

CARIBOU SEASONAL RANGES 

Fairbanks Calving 

Nome 

Summer

Winter 0 25 50

Miles 

Annual 

Source: Alaska Department of Fish & Game and ABR Inc. - Environmental Research and Services 

Map 3-20. Teshekpuk Lake Caribou Herd Seasonal Ranges in Northern Alaska (1990 - 2005 Satellite Telemetry Data)