alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SPILLER V. THE STATE.

(Decided May 13, 1913.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa. Circuit. Court.

Heard before Hon. Bernard Harwo'od.

McKinley, McQueen, Hawkins & Snow, for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and. W. L.. tin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Walker, P. J. —

No ground for reversal is found in the record. Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3097 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3097

  To amend the Federal Education Right to Privacy Act to improve the 
 access of the victims of crimes to information concerning the outcome 
    of disciplinary proceedings by institutions of higher education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2003

Mr. Frelinghuysen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Education Right to Privacy Act to improve the 
 access of the victims of crimes to information concerning the outcome 
    of disciplinary proceedings by institutions of higher education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``David Shick Honesty in Campus 
Justice Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO GENERAL EDUCATION PROVISIONS ACT.

    Section 444(b)(6) of the General Education Provisions Act (20 
U.S.C. 1232g(b)) is amended by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting 
the following:
    ``(6)(A) Nothwithstanding any other provision of this section, an 
institution of postsecondary education shall disclose to the alleged 
victim of any crime of violence (as that term is defined in section 16 
of title 18), or a nonforcible sex offense, the final results of any 
disciplinary proceeding conducted by such institution against a student 
who is the alleged perpetrator of such crime or offense with respect to 
such crime or offense. If the alleged victim of such crime or offense 
is deceased, the next of kin of such victim shall be treated as the 
alleged victim for purposes of this subparagraph.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 328.103 Inquiries and complaints.

Should any person have reason to believe that anyone is or may be acting in violation of section 18(a) of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1828(a)) or this subpart, or have questions regarding the accuracy of deposit-related representations, such individuals may contact the FDIC at the FDIC Information and Support Center, *http://ask.fdic.gov/fdicinformationandsupportcenter/s/,* or by telephone at 1-877-275-3342 (1-877-ASK-FDIC).
```
**Exhibit 32.1

                              CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

I, Douglas  Larson,  CEO of Eldorado  Artesian  Springs,  Inc. (the  "Company"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

     (1) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the  quarterly
     period ended  September  30, 2003 (the  "Report")  fully  complies with the
     requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and;

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  November 14, 2003

                                                /s/Douglas Larson
                                                ------------------------
                                                Douglas Larson
                                                CEO

Subscribed and sworn to be this 14th day of November 2003.

State of Colorado, County of Boulder

/s/Dez Ness_______
------------------
Dez Ness

My commission expires: 10-27-2007
```
# Supreme Court of Florida

____________ No. SC21

- 1189

____________ IN RE : AMENDMENT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.691 . May 19, 2022
PER CURIAM. This matter is before the Court for consideration of a proposed
amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.691

. See Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(b)(1). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.
The Florida Bar’s Criminal Pr ocedure Rules Committee (Committee) filed a report proposing an amendment to Florida Rule
of Criminal Procedure 3.691 (Post

- Trial Release) . The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar unanimously approved the Committee’s proposal. The Committee and the Cou rt published the proposal for comment in The Florida Bar News , but no comments
were received

.- 2

- Having considered the Committee’s report, the Court hereby adopts the amendment as proposed by the Committee. In subdivision (a) (When Authorized) of rule 3.691, the phrase “adjudicated guilty of” is replaced by the phrase “sentenced for.”
This amendment clarifies that post

- trial release is available to defendants who otherwise qualify for release where the adjudication
was withhel d. Accordingly, we amend the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by
struck

- through type. The amendments shall become effective July 1, 2022, at 12:01 a.m. It is so ordered. CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, MUÑIZ, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF TH IS AMENDMENT. Original Proceeding

– Florida Rules of Cr iminal Procedure Alan S. Apte, Chair, Criminal Procedure Rules Committee, Orlando, Florida, Joshua E. Doyle, Executive Director, and Mikalla Andies Davis, Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida,
for Petitioner- 3

- APPENDIX
RULE 3.691. POST
- TRIAL RELEASE (a) When Authorized. A defendant who has been adjudicated guilty of sentenced for the commission of any non

capital offense for which bail is not prohibited under section 903.133, Florida Statutes, may be released, pending review of the c onviction, at the discretion of either the trial or appellate court, applying the principles enunciated in Younghans v. State , 90 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 1956). No defendant may be admitted to bail on appeal from a conviction of a felony unless the defendant establishes that the appeal is taken in good faith, on grounds fairly debatable, and not frivolous. However, in no case shall bail be granted if the defendant has previously been convicted of a felony, the commission of which occurred prior to th e commission of the subsequent felony, and the defendant’s civil rights have not been restored or if other felony charges are pending against the defendant and probable cause has been found that the defendant has committed the felony or felonies at the tim e the request for bail is made. (b)
– (e) [No change] Committee Notes [No change]
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 10.14.1

                       AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     THIS AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 14, 1995 ("the
Amendment") is made and entered into this 1st day of February 2001 by and
between SeraCare, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (referred herein as the
"Corporation") and Jerry L. Burdick (the "Employee").

WHEREAS, the Corporation previously entered into an employment agreement on
November 15, 1995, (the "Employment Agreement");

AND WHEREAS the term of the Employment Agreement was previously extended by
the Board of Directors through February 6, 2003;

AND WHEREAS, the Corporation hereby wishes to amend the employment again;

AND WHEREAS the Employee wishes to have the employment agreement amended as
specified herein;

Now Therefore, the following extension and amendments are hereby agreed to by
both the Corporation and the Employee:

1.   The Term of the agreement has been extended through February 6, 2003.
2.   Effective February 1, 2001, the annual base compensation is hereby
     adjusted to be $175,000 per year plus an auto allowance of $750.00 per
     month.
3.   Employee shall receive 100,000 options with an exercise price of $3.25.
     Such options shall all have 7 year cliff vesting with accelerated
     vesting as follows;
          50,000 options will vest ratably over 4 years
          50,000 options will have accelerated vesting. They will vest ratably
                 over two years beginning with the achievement of his
                 business plan for 2002.
                 25,000 shares, 25,000 shares 1 year later.

     All 100,000 options shall be accelerated in the event of a change of
control.

All other terms, conditions and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall
remain effective throughout the term of this Amendment.

I hereby certify that the above amendment was adopted by unanimous vote of the
Board of Directors on January 12, 2001.


                                       Hereby certified

                                       /s/ Jerry L. Burdick
                                       -------------------------------
                                       Jerry L. Burdick
                                       Corporate Secretary

                                       /s/ Barry Plost
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

October 20, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 130244 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130244 COA: 265346 Oakland CC: 2003-192859-FH ANDREW JOSEPH CASCHERA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 4, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1 ), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the ju dgment of sentence and REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for resentencing. Under People v Johnson , 474 Mich 96 (2006), the trial court erred in its scoring of OV 11. Although th e defendant entered a plea agreement pursuant to People v Cobbs , 443 Mich 276 (1993), to be sentenced at the bottom of the guidelines range, which was then believed to be 84 months, that was not the correct guidelines minimum in light of Johnson

, supra . Because the defendant’s sentence was based on an inaccurate calculation of the guidelines range, he is entitled to be resentenced. Johnson , 474 Mich at 103.

W EAVER and C ORRIGAN , JJ., would deny leave to appeal.

s1017 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 20, 2006
Clerk
### NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION **L IMIT USE OF LAWN & GARDEN EQUIPMENT, STATEWIDE**  **RACM Analysis Control Measure:**  Limit the use of lawn and garden equipment **Description:** Create an incentive (perhaps, a form of exchange program) to encourage residential lawnmower users to switch to electric mowers. **Documentation:**
 Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (EIA), Retail Gasoline Prices: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/wrgp/mogas_home_page.html **Methodology:** Th e NONROAD 2005 model was used to estimate 2009 VOC, NOx, PM2.5 and SO2 emissions. Both daily and annual emissions were modeled. This measure was assumed to result in a 1% reduction of each pollutant. VOC benefits were only taken from the current exhaust emission totals, this control measure was assumed to have no impact on diurnal, crankcase, displacement or spillage emissions. The NONROAD model was used to estimate the gallons of gasoline used on a daily and annual basis for lawnmower use. The NONROAD model assumes residential diesel mowers will not be in use in 2009. **Inputs/A ssumptions:** 
 The percent reduction resulting from the implementation of restrictions on use are assumed to only have an impact on exhaust emissions.
 Itis assumed that the restricti ons would result in approximately a 1% reduction in use as the restrictions would be both costly and difficult to police.
 Cost benefits were calculated based on fuel consumption estimates generated using NONROAD 2005.
 Cost estimates to not include costs of enforcing the regulations.
 Gasoline cost = $2.40/gallon. NONROAD inputs: **NY -**  **NJ -**  **CT PA** **- NJ**  **- DE**  **PA -**  **NJ -**  **MD -**  **DE**

**Inputs Annual**  **Sum. Day Annual**  **Sum. Day Min**  19.1 66.8 24.2 65.1 **Max** 83.9 82.9 85.3 78.1 **Avg.** 51.0 75.0 54.4 75.0 **RVP** 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 **O2 Weig ht**  2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 **Gas Sulfur** 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030 0.0030 **Diesel Sulfur** 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 **Stage II** 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

### NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION **L IMIT USE OF LAWN & GARDEN EQUIPMENT, STATEWIDE**  **RACM Analysis Results:**  Ozone Analysis

– Daily Benefits (tpd) in New Jersey:



### Benefits **(Reductions) Ozone Non**  **- At** **tainment A rea**  **NY -**  **NJ -**  **CT PA**  **- NJ**  **- MD**  **- DE**  **VOC (Tons/Day )**  0.05 0.03 **NOx (Tons/Day** **)** 0.01 0.004 PM 2.5 Analysis

– Annual Benefits (tpy) in New Jersey:



### Benefits **(Reductions) PM**  **2.5** 

### Non **- At** **tainment A rea**  **NY -**  **NJ -**  **CT PA**  **- NJ**  **- DE**  **NOx (Tons/Year)** 1.28 0.26 **PM2.5 (Tons/Year)** 0.06 0.01 **SO 2**  

### (Tons/Year) 0.006 0.001 Cost Benefit Results:



### Nonattainment A **rea Ozone ($/tpd)**  **VOC NOx**  NY- NJ - CT $(11,343) $ (84,461) PA- NJ - MD - DE $(11,343) $ (84,464) Statewide $(11,343) $ (84,462) **Nonattainment A rea**  **PM2.5 ($/tpy )**  **NOx PM2**  **.5 SO2**  NY- NJ - CT $(68,185) $ (1,382,401) $ (14,587,642) PA- NJ - DE $(70,284) $ (1,382,401) $ (14,587,642) Statewide $(68,541) $ (1,382,401) $ (14,587,642) * Parentheses denote a cost savings.
Placeholder: Confidential Business Information item

Coolgas Inc. CBI Comment on 3-13-12

For more information please contact David Donaldson by phone at 202-343-9086 or by email at 

donaldson.david@epa.gov.
Federal Aviation Administration Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building 800 Independence Avenue Southwest Renton, WA98057 RE: FAA Case No. 2014NM720059
To whom it may concern, --------------------------


# IVED MAR l 72015 EARlNG DOCKET

My name is Jordan Olsen and I'm Head ofOperations for IXL Premium Lubricants. Back in July 2014 we were contacted by FAA official Richard Odekirk who informed us ofaviolation ofshipping one ofour products. We met with Mr. Odekirk in person atourfacility where he made us aware ofthe violation. We worked directlywith him to rectify the problem. As far as I knew everything was complete and settled back in July of2014 as we met all ofthe guidelines Mr. Odekirk prescribed. He never informed us thatthere would be any additional steps or contact by anyone concerning the matter. In February 2015 Iwas contacted by Mr. Jeffery Harper concerning this case again. I presumed him contacting me was a mistake oran oversight given we had alreadytaken care ofthis matterwith FAA official Mr. Odekirk back in July 2014. Isent Mr. Harper all of mycorrespondence with Mr. Odekirk and informed him this had already been taken care of. Mr. Harper has informed me that we only have two options as of now. One is to request a hearing, or the other is to pay a$29,100 penalty. I'd like to request a hearing as a $29,100 penalty would be financially unfeasible. Please reach out to me and let me knowwhat we need to do to receive a hearing for FAA Case No. 2014NM720059. Thank you, Jordan Olsen IXL Premium Lubricants 801-732-8885
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         465,748                 465,748
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,407,531               3,407,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,407,531               3,407,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,407,531               3,407,531
<SALES>                                        197,728                 349,855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,728                 349,855
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,748                  21,428
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                195,980                 328,427
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            195,980                 328,427
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   195,980                 328,427
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
§ 268.103 Complaints of discrimination covered by this part. ( a ) Individual and class complaints of employment discrimination and retaliation prohibited by title VII (discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex and national origin), the ADEA (discrimination on the basis of age when the aggrieved person is at least 40 years of age), the Rehabilitation Act (discrimination on the basis of disability), the Equal Pay Act (sex-based wage discrimination), or GINA (discrimination on the basis of genetic information) shall be processed in accordance with this part. Complaints alleging retaliation prohibited by the statutes listed in this paragraph (a) are considered to be complaints of discrimination for purposes of this part.
( b ) This part applies to all Board employees and applicants for employment at the Board, and to all employment policies or practices affecting Board employees or applicants for employment.
( c ) This part does not apply to Equal Pay Act complaints of employees whose services are performed within a foreign country or certain United States territories as provided in 29 U.S.C. 213(f).
[68 FR 18085, Apr. 15, 2003, as amended at 84 FR 27029, June 11, 2019]
#### § 352.11 Notice.

The FDIC shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the FDIC, and make such information available to them in such manner as the Chairman or designee finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination under section 504 or technology access provided under section 508 and this regulation.
§ 268.403 How to appeal. ( a ) The complainant, the Board, agent or individual class claimant (hereinafter appellant) must file an appeal with the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, at P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013, or electronically, or by personal delivery or facsimile. The appellant should use EEOC Form 573, Notice of Appeal/Petition, and should indicate what is being appealed.
( b ) The appellant shall furnish a copy of the appeal to the opposing party at the same time it is filed with the Commission. In or attached to the appeal to the Commission, the appellant must certify the date and method by which service was made on the opposing party.
( c ) If an appellant does not file an appeal within the time limits of this subpart, the appeal shall be dismissed by the Commission as untimely.
( d ) Any statement or brief on behalf of a complainant in support of the appeal must be submitted to the Office of Federal Operations within 30 days of filing the notice of appeal. Any statement or brief on behalf of the Board in support of its appeal must be submitted to the Office of Federal Operations within 20 days filing the notice of appeal. The Office of Federal Operations will accept statements or briefs in support of an appeal by facsimile transmittal, provided they are no more than 10 pages long.
( e ) The Board must submit the complaint file to the Office of Federal Operations within 30 days of initial notification that the complainant has filed an appeal or within 30 days of submission of an appeal by the Board.
( f ) Any statement or brief in opposition to an appeal must be submitted to the Commission and served on the opposing party within 30 days of receipt of the statement or brief supporting the appeal, or, if no statement or brief supporting the appeal is filed, within 60 days of receipt of the appeal. The Office of Federal Operations will accept statements or briefs in opposition to an appeal by facsimile provided they are no more than 10 pages long.
( g ) The Board will submit appeals, complaint files, and other filings to the Commission's Office of Federal Operations in a digital format acceptable to the Commission, absent a showing of good cause why the Board cannot submit digital records. Appellants are encouraged, but not required, to submit digital appeals and supporting documentation to the Commission's Office of Federal Operations in a format acceptable to the Commission.
[68 FR 18085, Apr. 15, 2003, as amended at 84 FR 27034, June 11, 2019]