alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### William R Evans

Bill Evans Photography

399 Shoreland Drive Lopez Island, WA 98261

360-468-2671 wre1962@gmail.com www.BillEvansPhotography.net

January 16, 2016

Petition for Section 333 Exemption

I hereby formally request FAA authorization for William R Evans - dba/ Bill Evans Photography (hereafter “PETITIONER”) to operate a UAS for civil (non-governmental) purposes other than for recreation or hobby.

PETITIONER requests to be exempted from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow PETITIONER to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection, including but not limited to aerial imaging.

PETITIONER requests this exemption for its use of UAS both within and without the United States. PETITIONER frequently travels abroad for photographic endeavors and seeks to use UAS in accordance with all laws of foreign and domestic governmental authorities.

PETITIONER requests this permission to pursue its use of UAS models including DJI Phantom 3 Professional (UAS CERTIFICATE NUMBER: FA3TK3T4KP), or other similar commercially-available and widely-available UAS models.

PETITIONER will conduct its use of UAS in a manner which will minimize risk to the NAS, other persons, and property. The following procedures will be followed: (1) UAS will be given a pre-flight inspection before each flight to examine airworthiness, (2) UAS will not be materially altered from commercial specifications except for battery, prop, and battery alterations, (3) UAS will not be flown over people, (4) UAS will always be flown within line of sight to operator(s) pursuant to Section 333(b)(1), (5) UAS will never reach altitudes over exceeding those allowed, (6) UAS will never reach speeds exceeding 50 mph, (7) operator will perform a preflight visual inspection of the NAS to determine nearby dangers such as low-flying manned or unmanned aerial vehicles, power lines, and buildings, (8) UAS will be checked for flight stability, proper connection to remotecontrol, and proper performance at a very low altitude before reaching the NAS, and (9) nonparticipating spectators will be asked to stay a safe distance away from the flight path of the UAS and its landing location. PETITIONER is an experienced UAS operator with more than one year of experience.This petition will benefit the public interest. PETITIONER works with local City and County

Government Agencies, their Committees and Historical Boards to Photograph and Video Public Buildings and Ground for prosperity and the enjoyment of future generations. PETITIONER will provide imagery which is not otherwise possible to be captured without the use of a UAV, which will assist companies to which the images may be sold, will enhance the public understanding of nature photographed by the UAS, and PETITIONER will be able to provide UAS safety information

to those with whom he or she comes in contact.

Please grant the requested exemption under Section 333.

William R Evans dba/ Bill Evans Photography
| USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS |
|----------------------------------|
| MD-DE-DC Water Science Center    |

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Open-File Report 99-88

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.
**Title:****Annual report [electronic resource].
** 
2002| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.52:
Item Number:0910-A-07 (online)
CGP System Number:000603990
 
 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
 
July 11, 2017********
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 10586 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Jose Avalos**

**- Rodriguez,** 
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19

- CR

- 240

- 1

Before **Smith, Stewart,** and **Graves,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *
The attorney appointed to represent Jose Avalos

- Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed brief s in accordance with Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Avalos

- Rodriguez has filed response s . We have reviewed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 18, 2021 Lyle W. C ayce Clerk Case: 20-10586 Document: 00516100143 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2021No. 20

- 10586

2 counsel’s brief s and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Avalos

- Rodriguez ’s response s . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
A ccordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R**

**.** 42. 2. Case: 20-10586 Document: 00516100143 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/18/2021
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT 10 (23)

2000 Advisory Director Share Ownership Plan as Approved on March 28, 2000.

RESOLVED, that Advisory Directors shall receive the same cash retainer and
meeting attendance fees received by active members of the Board of Directors and
shall receive a grant of 500 shares of the common stock of the Company after
each annual meeting of the shareholders after which he continues to serve as an
Advisory Director (the "2000 Advisory Director Share Ownership Plan"); and

RESOLVED FURTHER, that 10,000 shares of the Company's $1.00 par value common
stock shall be reserved for issuance under the 2000 Advisory Director Share
Ownership Plan, registered under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-8 and
listed on the New York Stock Exchange; and

RESOLVED FURTHER, that while an Advisory Director shall not be granted any new
stock options for his or her service as an Advisory Director, any unvested stock
options held by an Advisory Director which had been granted to him or her in his
or her previous capacity as an independent Director shall continue to vest
during any period (x) between his or her retirement from the Board (whether by
resignation or by expiration of his or her term of office) within six months of
the date of an annual meeting of the shareholders held on a date on which he or
she would be in excess of seventy years of age and (y) his or her retirement or
termination as an Advisory Director.

                                       1
### F W : qu e s ti on re g ar d i n g RR F NO x e mi ss i on l i mi t

P a nd e y

, J a n ar d a n (D E Q)

t o :

I d a li a P ere z

03 / 29 / 2012 05 : 15 A M

C c :

" Tho m pson, T a m e ra ( D E Q) "

H i d e D e t a il s

F r o m: " P a n d e y

, J a n ar d a n (D E Q ) " < J a n ar d a n. P a n d e y @ d e q.v i r g i n i a

. g ov>

To : I d a li a P ere z /R 9 / U S E P A / U S @E P A

C c : " Tho m pson, T a m e r a (D E Q ) " < T a m e r a .Tho m p son@d e q.v i r g i n i a

. g o v>

W e ca n c o n fi r m t h a t p e r m i t f

o r H arris o nbu r g R e s o u r c e R e c o v e r y F acili t y ( R e g. N o

. 8 1 0 1 6 ) w as mo d if i e d

i n 2 0 05 t o r e v is e N Ox l i m i t t

o 2 5 0 p p mv d a t 7% O 2



### . P l e as e c o n t a c t m e if y o u h a v e a n y qu e s

t i o n.

T h a n ks

.

J ana r d a n R. P a n d e y

, P

. E.

Ai r P e r m i t Man a ger

Vi r g i n i a D ept. o f E n vi r o n m e nta l Q u a li t y

- V RO

540

. 574

. 78 1 7 F A X : 54 0 .5 7 4.7 8 78

e m a il : J ana r d an

. P a n d e y @ deq

. vi r g i n i a

. g ov

441 1 E a r l y Ro a d, P

. O

. B o x 30 0 0, Ha rr i s o nbu r g, V A 2 2 801

F r o m: Id a li a Pe r

e z [ ma il t o : Pe r e z.Id a li a @ e p ama il. e p a .gov ]

S e n t: T u e sd a y

, M

a r ch 2 7

, 20

1 2 2: 3 4 P M

T o: T h o m p s o n

, T ame r a ( D E Q)

S u b j e c t: q u e s t i o n r

e g a rdi n g RR F N O x em iss i o n li m i t

T a m e r a,

I a m not s u r e w h o th e c o rr e c t pe rs on i n y ou r s ta ff i s to add r e ss t h i s q u e s t i o n. I w o u l d app r e c i a t e i f y o u

f o r w a r d t h i s a s n ee d ed.

I r e c e i v ed i n f o r m at i on f r o m one o f ou r l o c a l a i r a g en ci e s s tat i n g th a t t h e N Ox e m is s i on li m i t f o r the

Re s ou rc e Re c o v e r y F a c i l i t y

, wh i c h i s i n th e R A C T / B A C T /L AE R cl ea r i ng h ou s e a s 160 pp m at 7 % O 2, ha s

bee n r e v i s ed to 2 50 pp m at 7 % O 2 i n A u g u s t 2 0 05. C a n y o u p l e a s e c on f i r m

.

T han ks and be s t,

- Ida l ia

____ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ Ida l i a M. P é r e z

, P h. D

. Ru l e m a k i ng O f f i c e, Ai r D i v is i o n

U S E P A ( A I R

- 4 ) | 75 H a w t h o r ne S t. | S an Fr a n c i sc o, C A 9 4 10 5

P : 4 15. 9 72

. 32 4 8 | F : 4 15. 9 47. 3 579
§ 160.110 Most favored lender usury preemption for all savings associations. ( a ) *Definition.* The term “interest” as used in 12 U.S.C. 1463(g) includes any payment compensating a creditor or prospective creditor for an extension of credit, making available of a line of credit, or any default or breach by a borrower of a condition upon which credit was extended. It includes, among other things, the following fees connected with credit extension or availability: numerical periodic rates, late fees, not sufficient funds (NSF) fees, overlimit fees, annual fees, cash advance fees, and membership fees. It does not ordinarily include appraisal fees, premiums and commissions attributable to insurance guaranteeing repayment of any extension of credit, finders' fees, fees for document preparation or notarization, or fees incurred to obtain credit reports.
( b ) *Authority.* A savings association located in a state may charge interest at the maximum rate permitted to any state-chartered or licensed lending institution by the law of that state. If state law permits different interest charges on specified classes of loans, a Federal savings association making such loans is subject only to the provisions of state law relating to that class of loans that are material to the determination of the permitted interest. For example, a Federal savings association may lawfully charge the highest rate permitted to be charged by a state-licensed small loan company, without being so licensed, but subject to state law limitations on the size of loans made by small loan companies. State supervisors determine the degree to which state-chartered savings associations must comply with state laws other than those imposing restrictions on interest, as defined in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Effect on state definitions of interest.* The Federal definition of the term “interest” in paragraph (a) of this section does not change how interest is defined by the individual states (nor how the state definition of interest is used) solely for purposes of state law. For example, if late fees are not “interest” under state law where a savings association is located but state law permits its most favored lender to charge late fees, then a savings association located in that state may charge late fees to its intrastate customers. The savings association may also charge late fees to its interstate customers because the fees are interest under the Federal definition of interest and an allowable charge under state law where the savings association is located. However, the late fees would not be treated as interest for purposes of evaluating compliance with state usury limitations because state law excludes late fees when calculating the maximum interest that lending institutions may charge under those limitations.
( d ) *Transferred loans.* Interest on a loan that is permissible under 12 U.S.C. 1463(g)(1) shall not be affected by the sale, assignment, or other transfer of the loan.
[76 FR 49030, Aug. 9, 2011, as amended at 85 FR 33536, June 2, 2020]
#### THE COUNTY OF HUDSON ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

.Submitted February 16, 1940 —

Decided April 25, 1940.

For the appellants, J. *Fmil Walscheid*and *Collins & Corbin.*

For the respondents, *John A. Bernhard.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chief Justice, Case, Donges, Hehee, Poetee, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, Hague, JJ. 11.

*For reversal*— None.
Exhibit 10.1 Promissory Note


$8,000.00

February 18, 2015




PROMISSORY NOTE




As hereinafter agreed Jolley Marketing Inc., jointly and severally, promises to pay to the order of McKinley Enterprise Profit Sharing Plan, Eight Thousand Dollars and no cents.  ($8,000.00).  It is hereby agreed that the said amount shall be payable in full twenty-four months from the date of the note.  Interest shall accrue at the rate of Eight Percent (8%) per annum will be charged on the unpaid balance until the whole amount of the principal and interest is paid.  There shall be no penalty for early payment of this note.




Should default be made in the payment of the demand note then the whole unpaid amount shall become immediately due and payable; and in the event default is made and said note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection or suit is brought on the same, then the undersigned agrees to pay all costs and attorney’s fees that might be incurred.  If there is a lawsuit, borrower agrees upon lenders request to submit to the jurisdiction of the county of Utah County, the State of Utah.  This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Utah.




UNDERSIGNED:

Steven White




/s/  Steve White      

Steven White, President

Jolley Marketing, Inc.
§ 269b.121 Contents of answer. The answer shall contain: ( a ) A specific admission or denial, and where appropriate, explanation thereof; or if the respondent is without knowledge of the allegation, he shall so state and such statement shall operate as a denial. Admissions or denials may be to all or part of an allegation but shall be responsive to the substance of the allegation;
( b ) A specified, detailed statement of any affirmative defense;
( c ) A clear and concise statement of the facts and matters of law relied upon constituting the grounds of defense.
Any allegation of the charge not denied in the answer may be deemed admitted and may be so found by the panel.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3217 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3217

  To provide for the conveyance of several small parcels of National 
  Forest System land in the Apalachicola National Forest, Florida, to 
   resolve boundary discrepancies involving the Mt. Trial Primitive 
   Baptist Church of Wakulla County, Florida, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2003

   Mr. Boyd introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the conveyance of several small parcels of National 
  Forest System land in the Apalachicola National Forest, Florida, to 
   resolve boundary discrepancies involving the Mt. Trial Primitive 
   Baptist Church of Wakulla County, Florida, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, APALACHICOLA NATIONAL FOREST, FLORIDA.

    (a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of Agriculture may 
convey, without consideration, to the Mt. Trial Primitive Baptist 
Church of Wakulla County, Florida, all right, title, and interest of 
the United States in and to four parcels of real property in the 
Apalachicola National Forest, Florida, located in section 5 of township 
5 south, range 2 west, Tallahassee meridian, and consisting of 
approximately 9.95 acres, 0.09 acres, 0.09 acres, and 0.096 acres, 
respectively, as depicted on a map, plat number 5-118, prepared as part 
of a 1983 Forest Service survey.
    (b) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal 
description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection (a) 
shall be determined by the Secretary.
    (c) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance 
under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect 
the interests of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.6 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in the proxy statement of Industrial Holdings, Inc.
of our report dated February 24, 2000, on the financial statements of OF
Acquisition, L.P.



KUHL & SCHULTZ, P.C.

Jackson, Michigan


July 13, 2000

                                      L-1
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
ss.1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Datascension Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report"), I, David
P. Lieberman, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ David P. LiebermanDAVID
      P. LIEBERMAN
                Prin.
      Accounting Officer





Dated:
December __, 2008
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.14


                      TUMBLEWEED COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
                WAIVER OF AMENDED AND RESTATED INVESTORS' RIGHTS
                                    AGREEMENT

     The undersigned Holders (as that term is defined in the Amended and
Restated Investors' Rights Agreement, dated January 31, 2000, as amended (the
"Rights Agreement") among Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the "Company") and
such holders of Registrable Securities, (as that term is defined in the Rights
Agreement) which Holders together hold at least 50% of the outstanding
Registrable Securities of the Company, hereby waive, on behalf of themselves and
all other Holders of Registrable Securities under the Rights Agreement, all
rights, including without limitation all registration rights and indemnification
rights, all Holders have pursuant to the Rights Agreement in connection with the
proposed underwritten public offering (the "Offering") by the Company and
certain stockholders of the Company. Pursuant to Sections 3.10 and 4.5.2 of the
Rights Agreement, consent to this Waiver will bind all parties to the Rights
Agreement.

     This Waiver may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which
shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument.

     The undersigned understand that the Company and the underwriters of the
Offering will proceed with the Offering in reliance on this Wavier.


<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Waiver as of
__________ __, 2000.



For Corporation/Partnership:                 For Individual:



___________________________                  ____________________________
(Name of Entity)                             (Name)


By:___________________                       ____________________________
Title:________________                       (Signature)