alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The CIT Group/Commercial Services, Inc.
11 West 42nd Street
New York, NY 10036
    
    T: 212 461-5200
 
  Bernard Chaus, Inc.
Cynthia Steffe Acquisition, LLC
S.L. Danielle Acquisition, LLC
    Interest is charged on any adjustments under the Agreement and on any advances that
may be made under section 6 above as of the last day of each month based on the
daily debit balances in your Funds In Use account for that month, at a rate equal to
the sum of two percent (2%) plus the JPMorgan Rate (defined below).
  Very truly yours,THE CIT GROUP/COMMERCIAL SERVICES, INC.By
    /s/ Geoffrey GoldsteinName:
    Geoffrey GoldsteinTitle:
    Vice President Read and Agreed to:BERNARD CHAUS, INC.By
    
    /s/ Barton HeminoverName: Barton Heminover
Title: Chief Financial OfficerCYNTHIA STEFFE ACQUISITION, LLC
    
    
    
    S.L. DANIELLE ACQUISITION, LLCBy
    
    /s/ Barton Heminover
    
    
    
    By
    
    /s/ Barton HeminoverName: Barton Heminover
Title: Chief Financial Officer
    
    
    
    Name: Barton Heminover
Title: Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gary Graves, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of LPA Holding Corp. and La
Petite Academy, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants' other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrants, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants' disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants' internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants' most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants' fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants' internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants' other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants' auditors and the audit committee of the registrants' board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably like
to adversely affect the registrants' ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants' internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 30, 2005


By /s/ Gary A. Graves
   ----------------------------------
   Gary A. Graves
   Chief Executive Officer
§ 367.1 Authority, purpose, scope and application. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is adopted pursuant to section 12(f) (4) and (5) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1822(f) (4) and (5), and the rule-making authority of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) found at 12 U.S.C. 1819. Other regulations implementing these statutory directives appear at 12 CFR part 366.
( b ) *Purpose.* This part is designed to inform contractors and subcontractors (including their affiliated business entities, key employees and management officials) regarding their rights to notice and an opportunity to be heard on FDIC actions involving suspension and exclusion from contracting and rescission of existing contracts. This part is in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other statute or regulation that may apply to such contractual activities.
( c ) *Scope.* This part applies to: ( 1 ) Contractors, other than attorneys or law firms providing legal services, submitting offers to provide services or entering into contracts to provide services to the FDIC acting in any capacity; and
( 2 ) Subcontractors entering into contracts to perform services under a proposed or existing contract with the FDIC.
( d ) *Application.* ( 1 ) This part will apply to entities that become contractors, as defined in § 367.2(f), on or after December 30, 1996. In addition, this part will apply to contractors as defined in § 367.2(f) that are performing contracts on December 30, 1996.
( 2 ) This part will also apply to actions initiated on or after December 30, 1996 regardless of the date of the cause giving rise to the actions.
( 3 ) Contracts entered into by the former Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) that were transferred to the FDIC will be treated in the same manner as FDIC contracts under this part.
( 4 ) RTC actions taken under the RTC regulations on or before December 31, 1995, will be honored as if taken by the FDIC. A contractor subject to an RTC exclusion or suspension will be precluded thereby from participation in the FDIC's contracting program unless that exclusion or suspension is modified or terminated under the provisions of this part.
§ 313.87 Procedure. After the debtor requests a hearing, the hearing official shall notify the debtor of: ( a ) The date and time of a telephonic hearing;
( b ) The date, time, and location of an in-person oral hearing; or
( c ) The deadline for the submission of evidence for a written hearing.
# C_2020343EN.01001601.xml

| 15.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/16

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2020/C 343/12)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 6 July 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85 283 |
| Decision No | 084/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 liquidity support grant scheme for undertakings in the tourism sector |
| Legal basis | The letter of additional assignment to the budget 2020 from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries and the Guidelines for grants to improve liquidity and enable the restructuring and reopening of the tourism industry (MNOK 250) dated 3 July 2020 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Providing access to liquidity for tourism sector undertakings facing a sudden shortage of liquidity due to the impact on the economy of the COVID-19 outbreak. |
| Form of aid | Grants |
| Budget | NOK 250 million |
| Duration | 6.7.2020 - 31.12.2020 |
| Economic sectors | Tourism sector (NACE 49, 50, 51, 55, 56, 77, 79, 90, 91 and 93) |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Innovation Norway |
| Akersgata 13 |
| N-0104 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

6 July 2020

Case No

85 283

Decision No

084/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 liquidity support grant scheme for undertakings in the tourism sector

Legal basis

The letter of additional assignment to the budget 2020 from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries and the Guidelines for grants to improve liquidity and enable the restructuring and reopening of the tourism industry (MNOK 250) dated 3 July 2020

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Providing access to liquidity for tourism sector undertakings facing a sudden shortage of liquidity due to the impact on the economy of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Form of aid

Grants

Budget

NOK 250 million

Duration

6.7.2020 - 31.12.2020

Economic sectors

Tourism sector (NACE 49, 50, 51, 55, 56, 77, 79, 90, 91 and 93)

Name and address of the granting authority

Innovation Norway

Akersgata 13

N-0104 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/.

---
#### § 1270.6 Transactions in consolidated obligations.

The general regulations of the Department of the Treasury now or hereafter in force governing transactions in United States securities, except 31 CFR part 357 regarding book-entry procedure, are hereby incorporated into this subpart C of this part, so far as applicable and as necessarily modified to relate to consolidated obligations, as the regulations of FHFA for similar transactions on consolidated obligations. The book-entry procedure for consolidated obligations is contained in subpart D of this part.
#### § 390.307 Savings account.

The term *savings account* means any withdrawable account, except a demand account as defined in § 390.290, a tax and loan account, a note account, a United States Treasury general account, or a United States Treasury time deposit-open account.
§ 324.31 Mechanics for calculating risk-weighted assets for general credit risk. ( a ) *General risk-weighting requirements.* An FDIC-supervised institution must apply risk weights to its exposures as follows: ( 1 ) An FDIC-supervised institution must determine the exposure amount of each on-balance sheet exposure, each OTC derivative contract, and each off-balance sheet commitment, trade and transaction-related contingency, guarantee, repo-style transaction, financial standby letter of credit, forward agreement, or other similar transaction that is not: ( i ) An unsettled transaction subject to § 324.38;
( ii ) A cleared transaction subject to § 324.35;
( iii ) A default fund contribution subject to § 324.35;
( iv ) A securitization exposure subject to §§ 324.41 through 324.45; or
( v ) An equity exposure (other than an equity OTC derivative contract) subject to §§ 324.51 through 324.53.
( 2 ) The FDIC-supervised institution must multiply each exposure amount by the risk weight appropriate to the exposure based on the exposure type or counterparty, eligible guarantor, or financial collateral to determine the risk-weighted asset amount for each exposure.
( b ) Total risk-weighted assets for general credit risk equals the sum of the risk-weighted asset amounts calculated under this section.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LPA Holding Corp. and La Petite Academy,
Inc. (the "Companies") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 28, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gary A. Graves, Chief Executive Officer and I, Neil P. Dyment,
Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
              U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Companies.

/s/ Gary A. Graves                       /s/ Neil P. Dyment

Gary A. Graves                           Neil P. Dyment
Chief Executive Officer                  Chief Financial Officer
February 6, 2004                         February 6, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Companies and will be retained by the Companies and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Company Plant Kiln

Avg 

(ppmd@7%O2)

Capitol Cement* San Antonio, TX PH/PC 0.34

Alamo Cement San Antonio, TX PH or PC 0.46

Holcim Portland, CO PH/PC 1.10

Holcim Ada, OK Wet 1.42

Capitol Cement San Antonio, TX Wet 1.49

Holcim* Ste Genevieve,MO PH/PC 1.55

Lehigh Tehachapi, CA PH/PC 2.56

Holcim Devils Slide, UT PH/PC 5.15

National Cement Ragland, AL PH/PC 7.61

Holcim Catskill, NY Wet 9.11

Lafarge Harleyville, SC PH/PC 14.30

Lehigh Redding, CA PH 14.87

Lone Star Pryor, OK Dry, kiln3 15.07

Lehigh Leeds, AL PH 15.12

Lone Star* Pryor, OK Dry, kiln 1&2 17.03

Ash Grove* Louisville, NE PH or PC 24.70

Lafarge Ravena,NY Wet, K1 26.23

Lafarge Alpena, MI Dry, K23 30.78

CalPortland Mojave, CA PH/PC, K1 55.37

Avg of top 3 0.63
#### SARKEYS v. EVANS.

No. 30697.

Oct. 5, 1943.

*141 P. 2d 801.*

Chas. E. Wells, of Shawnee, for plaintiff in error.

Wyatt, Wyatt & Green, of Shawnee, for defendant in error.

CORN, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Pottawatomie county, quieting title to real estate based upon a county deed to property acquired by the county at a tax resale.

The action was brought by Elza Evans, grantee in said county deed, against S. J. Sarkeys, the record owner at the time of the tax sale, and numerous other defendants. Judgment was for the plaintiff, and the defendant Sarkeys appeals.

It is contended by the defendant that the case was not prosecuted by the real party in interest.

At the close of the evidence the defendant demurred to the evidence on the ground that the evidence snows that the plaintiff is not the real party in interest, which demurrer was by the court overruled, and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

There may be two theories upon which the plaintiff could maintain the action:

(1) Where he owned the land at the time the action was commenced, and sold it subsequently. Sec. 235, T. 12, O. S. 1941.

(2) Where he was warrantor of the title. Cressler v. Brown, 79 Okla. 170, 192 P. 417; Kingkade v. Plummer, 111 Okla. 197, 239 P. 628; annotation 97 A. L. R. 711.

The record is clear that the plaintiff conveyed the land prior to the date of the trial, and did not own any interest therein at that time. But the record is silent as to when he made such convey*160anee and as to whether he warranted the title to the land when he sold it.

Therefore, in the absence of a showing in the record that the plaintiff was a proper party to prosecute the action, the judgment is reversed.

GIBSON, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., not participating.
Note to Docket EPA-R10-OAR-2013-0005 regarding 80 FR 78372

We note that the aforementioned proposal included one typographical error and a clarification. 

On page 78375 in the section describing revisions to Division 240 of the Oregon Administrative 

Rules, we incorrectly cited OAR 340-240-0110 in the list of revised sections when we should 

have cited OAR 340-240-0010 (80 FR 78372, at 78375). This error is non-substantive and does 

not affect the action. With regard to clarifications, the proposal noted that the Oregon submittal 

was December 14, 2012. The date on the submittal in the docket is December 12, 2012 and that 

date is referenced in this final rule.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 60 (Thursday, March 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 19062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07256]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8261]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Hans Richter: Encounters''

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 12, 2013, notice was published on page 15802 of the 
Federal Register (volume 78, number 48) of determinations made by the 
Department of State pertaining to the exhibit ``Hans Richter: 
Encounters.'' The referenced notice is corrected to accommodate an 
additional object to be included in the exhibition. Pursuant to the 
authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 
U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign 
Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 
22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of 
October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 
2003), I hereby determine that the additional object to be included in 
the exhibition ``Hans Richter: Encounters,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural 
significance. The additional object is imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the additional exhibit object at The Los 
Angeles County Museum of Art in Los Angeles, California from on or 
about May 5, 2013, until on or about September 2, 2013, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects that includes this additional object, 
contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, 
U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6473). The mailing address 
is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: March 21, 2013.
Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-07256 Filed 3-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
§ 407.1 Purpose, scope and definitions. ( a ) Consistent with the principles that: ( 1 ) The public is entitled to the fullest practicable information regarding the decision-making processes of the Federal Government, and
( 2 ) the rights of individuals and the ability of the Export-Import Bank of the United States to carry out its statutory responsibilities should be protected, this part is promulgated pursuant to the directive of section (g) of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(g), and specifically implements sections (b) through (f) of said Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b (b) through (f).
( b ) The term *meeting* means any meeting of the Board of Directors of Eximbank at which a quorum is present and where deliberations determine or result in the joint conduct or disposition of official Eximbank business.
( c ) The term *regularly scheduled meeting* means meetings of the Board of Directors or the Executive Committee which are held at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday of each week.
( d ) The term *General Counsel* means the General Counsel and his or her designees.
[42 FR 12417, Mar. 4, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 12136, Mar. 22, 1982; 49 FR 41237, Oct. 22, 1984; 72 FR 66043, Nov. 27, 2007]
§ 252.3 Reservation of authority. ( a ) *In general.* Nothing in this part limits the authority of the Board under any provision of law or regulation to impose on any company additional enhanced prudential standards, including, but not limited to, additional risk-based or leverage capital or liquidity requirements, leverage limits, limits on exposures to single counterparties, risk-management requirements, stress tests, or other requirements or restrictions the Board deems necessary to carry out the purposes of this part or Title I of the Dodd-Frank Act, or to take supervisory or enforcement action, including action to address unsafe and unsound practices or conditions, or violations of law or regulation.
( b ) *Modifications or extensions of this part.* The Board may extend or accelerate any compliance date of this part if the Board determines that such extension or acceleration is appropriate. In determining whether an extension or acceleration is appropriate, the Board will consider the effect of the modification on financial stability, the period of time for which the modification would be necessary to facilitate compliance with this part, and the actions the company is taking to come into compliance with this part.
( c ) *Reservation of authority for certain foreign banking organizations.* The Board may permit a foreign banking organization to comply with the requirements of this part through a subsidiary. In making this determination, the Board shall consider: ( 1 ) The ownership structure of the foreign banking organization, including whether the foreign banking organization is owned or controlled by a foreign government;
( 2 ) Whether the action would be consistent with the purposes of this part; and
( 3 ) Any other factors that the Board determines are relevant.
[Reg. YY, 79 FR 17315, Mar. 27, 2014, as amended at 84 FR 59098, Nov. 1, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
TERRATECH INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 28,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                          60,350
<SECURITIES>                                    23,308
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,622
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,079
<INVENTORY>                                      2,937
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,156
<PP&E>                                         136,679
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 405,160
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,821
<BONDS>                                        192,678
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,830
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   405,160
<SALES>                                         19,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               210,585
<CGS>                                           15,837
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  173,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   813
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   490
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,660
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,852
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,042
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,810
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,810
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>