alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 192.430 Charter amendments. ( a ) *Conversion from Federally-chartered mutual savings association or savings bank to Federally-chartered stock savings association or savings bank.* If the savings association is a Federally-chartered mutual savings association or savings bank and it converts to a Federally-chartered stock savings association or savings bank, it must apply to the OCC to amend its charter and bylaws consistent with 12 CFR 5.22, as part of the savings association's application for conversion. The savings association may only include OCC pre-approved anti-takeover provisions in its amended charter and bylaws. *See* 12 CFR 5.22(g)(7).
( b ) *Conversion from Federally-chartered mutual savings association or savings bank to State-chartered stock savings association or savings bank.* If the savings association is a Federally-chartered mutual savings association or savings bank and is converting to a State-chartered stock savings association under this part, the savings association must surrender its charter to the OCC for cancellation promptly after the State issues its new State stock charter. The savings association must promptly file a copy of its new State stock charter with the FDIC.
( c ) *Conversion from State-chartered mutual savings association or savings bank to Federally State-chartered stock savings association or savings bank.* If the savings association is a State-chartered mutual savings association or savings bank, and is converting to a Federally chartered stock savings association or savings bank, it must apply to the OCC for a new charter and bylaws consistent with 12 CFR 5.22. The savings association may only include OCC pre-approved anti-takeover provisions in its charter and bylaws. *See* 12 CFR 5.22(g)(7).
( d ) *Priority of accounts.* In any conversion described in this section that involves a mutual holding company, the charter of each resulting subsidiary savings association of the holding company must contain the following provision: In any situation in which the priority of the accounts of the association is in controversy, all such accounts must, to the extent of their withdrawable value, be debts of the association having the same priority as the claims of general creditors of the association not having priority (other than any priority arising or resulting from consensual subordination) over other general creditors of the association.
( e ) *Liquidation account.* The savings association's new or amended charter must require the savings association to establish and maintain a liquidation account for eligible and supplemental eligible account holders under § 192.450.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 292

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT

To amend title 4, United States Code, to add National 

Korean War Veterans Armistice Day to the list of days 

on which the flag should especially be displayed.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 292 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Korean War Veterans 

3 Recognition Act of 2003’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DISPLAY OF FLAG ON NATIONAL KOREAN WAR VET5 ERANS ARMISTICE DAY. 

6 Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code, is amend7 ed by inserting ‘‘National Korean War Veterans Armistice 

8 Day, July 27;’’ after ‘‘July 4;’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7352

BRADLEY MAXWELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE; DAVID ROBINSON; TERRY GLENN; HENRY PONTON; 

LESLIE FLEMING,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior 

District Judge. (7:15-cv-00468-NKM-RSB)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bradley Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bradley Maxwell appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maxwell 

v. Clarke, No. 7:15-cv-00468-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2016). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
[VIALTA LETTERHEAD]
                                                                   Exhibit 10.23

April 5, 2001


Didier Pietri
2632 Claray Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90077

Dear Didier:

We are pleased to make the following offer to employment to you:

Position:             President
Department:           Office of the President
Manager:              Fred Chan, Chairman & CEO

Compensation:         $12,500 SEMI-MONTHLY (ANNUALIZED AT $300,000)

First-Year Bonus:     $100,000 fully guaranteed after first year of employment
                      is completed.

Stock Options:        1,000,000 shares - the vesting schedule is 25% after the
                      first year. After that time, the vesting is monthly at a
                      rate of 1/48, subject to approval by the Board of
                      Directors at the next meeting. All shareholders and option
                      holders will be diluted as additional shares or options
                      are issued.

Benefits:             Medical, Dental and Vision coverage is effective on your
                      start date. HMO coverage is paid in full for the employee.
                      PPO coverage requires a deduction from your paycheck.
                      Medical and dental coverage for eligible dependents is
                      available at 25% of cost.

Housing:              Housing will be provided for the first two years, after
                      which time additional provision can be discussed.

At-Will Basis:        Vialta is an at-will employer in accordance with the laws
                      of the State of California. You are free to leave at any
                      time, and similarly, the Company can terminate your
                      employment, with or without cause, at any time.

One-Year Agreement:   Employment is guaranteed for one year.

Travel:               The Company will pay up to 10 trips per month for you to
                      visit your family in Los Angeles.

Effective:            This offer will remain effective until April 9, 2001.

Start Date:           On or before April 30, 2001

New hire orientation is held every Monday at 9:00 AM (please bring all required
employment eligibility documents)




<PAGE>   2




Didier, we look forward to a positive response to our offer and to a mutually
beneficial, professional relationship. Please indicate your acceptance by your
signature and start date below.


/s/ Fred Chan                               /s/ Didier Pietri           04/07/01
-----------------------------------         ------------------------------------
Fred Chan
Chairman
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Start Date
[DESCRIPTION]  MATERIAL CONTRACT

EX-10.20e      Copy of Letter dated November 25, 1996,
               terminating the Agreement between
               WellCare of New York, Inc. and
               Park West Entertainment, Inc.

CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

November 25, 1996

Mr. Edward A. Ullmann, President
Park West Entertainment, Inc.
Park West Office Complex/Hurley Avenue Extension
Kingston, New York   12401

Re:  Agreement between WellCare of New York, Inc.
     and Park West Entertainment, Inc.

Dear Ed:

Pursuant to your exit proposal dated September 27, 1996, this letter
is to confirm the understanding between the parties pursuant to
Section III 1.0 of the Agreement between WellCare of New York, Inc.
and Park West Entertainment, Inc., dated January 1, 1996.  Since we
have reached agreement on all outstanding issues, this letter will
serve to confirm that the termination date of the attached agreement
will be December 27, 1996, ninety (90) days from the  date of your
September 27, 1996 letter.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Joseph R. Papa

Joseph R. Papa
President/COO

JRP:mg
Attachment

cc:  Robert W. Morey
     Marystephanie Corsones
###### Editorial Note on Part 220

#### Editorial Note:

A copy of each form referred to in this part is filed as a part of the original document. Copies are available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any Federal Reserve Bank.

#### § 220.109 [Reserved]
<PAGE>


                     [GMAC COMMERCIAL CREDIT LLC LETTERHEAD]


                                             January 29, 2002


Bernard Chaus, Inc.
530 Seventh Avenue
New York, New York 10018
Attn: Josephine Chaus, Chairwoman of the Board

Bernard Chaus, Inc.
800 Secaucus Road
Secaucus, New Jersey 07094
Attn: Bart Heminover, Vice President of Finance

Ladies/Gentlemen:

     Reference is made to the Second Restated and Amended Financing Agreement
between you and us dated as of October 10, 1997, as supplemented and/or amended
(the "Financing Agreement"). All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein
shall have such meaning as are ascribed to them under the Financing Agreement.

     This letter will confirm that the Financing Agreement is amended in the
following manner: The definition of 'Permitted Overadvances' shall be amended
for the period of January 24, 2002 through June 30, 2002 as follows, and shall
mean the amounts set forth below opposite the applicable period adjacent to such
amount:

PERIOD                                          PERMITTED OVERADVANCES
------                                          ----------------------
January 24, 2002 through February 10, 2002           $7,500,000.00
February 11, 2002 through May 9, 2002                $5,000,000.00
May 10, 2002 through May 30, 2002                    $8,250,000.00
May 31, 2002 through June 9, 2002                    $3,750,000.00
June 10, 2002 through June 29, 2002                  $8,000,000.00
June 30, 2002 through July 9, 2002                   $2,750,000.00
July 10, 2002 and thereafter                         $     -0-

     Except as heretofore and hereby amended the Financing Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect in accordance with its original terms.

<PAGE>


     If the foregoing accurately reflects our agreement, please execute a copy
of this letter in the space provided below and return an executed copy to our
offices.


                                        Very truly yours,
                                        GMAC Commercial Credit LLC


                                        By: /s/ John H. McGowan
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Name: John H. McGowan
                                           Title: Vice President


Read and Agreed to:

Bernard Chaus, Inc.

By: /s/ Barton Heminover
   --------------------------------
   Name:   BARTON HEMINOVER
   Title:  Vice President of Finance


Guarantor:

By: /s/ Barton Heminover
   --------------------------------

Chaus Retail, Inc.

By: /s/ Barton Heminover
   --------------------------------
   Name:  BARTON HEMINOVER
   Title: Vice President of Finance
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40267

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MELISSA STRINGER, 

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-00-CR-314-1

- - - - - - - - - -

October 15, 2001

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Melissa Stringer appeals her sentence, following a guiltyplea conviction, for one count of distribution of child

pornography and one count of possession of child pornography, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2552(a)(4), (b)(1), and (b)(2). 

Stringer does not contest her prison term or her term of

supervised release. Instead, for the first time on appeal, she

challenges the imposition of special conditions of supervision. 

These claims are reviewable for plain error only. United States
No. 01-40267

-2-

v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc). 

First, Stringer argues that the district court’s oral

pronouncement of the supervised-release condition prohibiting her

from owning a computer contradicted the court’s written

pronouncement, by which the court stated that she could not “own,

possess or use a computer.” Although an oral pronouncement

controls when there is a “conflict” between a written sentence

and an oral pronouncement, Stringer has not shown that the

distinction in her case is anything other than an “ambiguity,”

which would require this court to examine the entire record to

determine the district court’s true intent. See United States v.

Martinez, 250 F.3d 941, 942 (5th Cir. 2001). She has not shown

“clear” or “obvious” error. See Calverley, 37 F.3d at 162.

Second, Stringer contends that a supervisory condition that

prohibited her from working around children and the computer-use

condition were both vague and overbroad. Although it appears

that the district court could have tailored these two conditions

more specifically to correspond to Stringer’s personal and

criminal background, Stringer has cited no precedential

decisional authority to demonstrate that any error by the

district court was clear or obvious. Accordingly, Stringer has

not shown plain error as to her second set of arguments, either. 

See Calverley, 37 F.3d at 162-64.

The sentence is AFFIRMED.

Stringer’s motion to seal her motion for downward departure

is GRANTED.
§ 308.154 Decision on review. ( a ) Within 30 days of receipt of the request for review, the Board of Directors or its designee, shall notify the bank and/or the individual filing the reconsideration (hereafter “petitioner”) of the FDIC's decision on review.
( b ) If the decision is to grant the review and approve the notice, the bank and the individual involved shall be so notified.
( c ) A denial of the request for review pursuant to section 32 of the FDIA shall: ( 1 ) Inform the petitioner that a written request for a hearing, stating the relief desired and the grounds therefore, may be filed with the Administrative Officer within 15 days after the receipt of the denial; and
( 2 ) Summarize or cite the relevant considerations specified in § 308.152.
( d ) If a decision is not rendered within 30 days, the petitioner may file a request for a hearing within fifteen days from the date of expiration.
[56 FR 37975, Aug. 9, 1991, as amended at 86 FR 2249, Jan. 12, 2021]
#### §§ 324.23-324.29 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of IR BioSciences  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John N. Fermanis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:


     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


     /s/ John N. Fermanis
     --------------------
     Chief Financial Officer
     August 14, 2006


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### § 347.301 Purpose, authority, and scope.

Under the International Lending Supervision Act of 1983 (Title IX, Pub. L. 98-181, 97 Stat. 1153) (12 U.S.C. 3901 *et seq.*) (ILSA), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation prescribes the regulations in this subpart relating to international lending activities of banks.
# C_2022202EN.01001001.xml

| 19.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/10

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2022/C 202/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 25 January 2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 88021 |
| Decision No | 011/22/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Renewal of and amendments to the COVID-19 Compensation scheme for operators of year-round, commercial, long-distance scheduled bus or passenger boat services |
| Legal basis | The regulation on a temporary compensation scheme for operators of commercial bus and passenger boat routes with a loss in turnover caused by the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Compensation for loss incurred by COVID-19 outbreak and the infection control measures implemented by the Norwegian authorities, to ensure the continuity of year-round, commercial, long-distance bus and passenger boat services that do not receive compensation from local or other public authorities for public services obligation |
| Form of aid | Direct grants |
| Budget | NOK 300 million |
| Intensity | 80 % |
| Duration | 1.1.2022 - 30.6.2022 |
| Economic sectors | Land and sea transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Norwegian Railway Directorate |
| Jernbanedirektoratet |
| P.O. Box 16 Sentrum |
| N-0101 Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

25 January 2022

Case No

88021

Decision No

011/22/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Renewal of and amendments to the COVID-19 Compensation scheme for operators of year-round, commercial, long-distance scheduled bus or passenger boat services

Legal basis

The regulation on a temporary compensation scheme for operators of commercial bus and passenger boat routes with a loss in turnover caused by the COVID-19 outbreak

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Compensation for loss incurred by COVID-19 outbreak and the infection control measures implemented by the Norwegian authorities, to ensure the continuity of year-round, commercial, long-distance bus and passenger boat services that do not receive compensation from local or other public authorities for public services obligation

Form of aid

Direct grants

Budget

NOK 300 million

Intensity

80 %

Duration

1.1.2022 - 30.6.2022

Economic sectors

Land and sea transport

Name and address of the granting authority

The Norwegian Railway Directorate

Jernbanedirektoratet

P.O. Box 16 Sentrum

N-0101 Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Internet: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0248 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DILLON PATRICK PIERCE,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 17 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 12 2023

10/12/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0248
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,348,000
<SECURITIES>                                   415,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,700,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,887,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,357,000
<PP&E>                                       5,350,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,860,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,224,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       98,0000
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,250,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,860,000
<SALES>                                     13,963,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,963,000
<CGS>                                       13,140,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,140,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,846,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             216,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,169,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (254,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (915,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 147,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (768,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>