United States Office of Water Environmental Protection Washington, DC 20460 September 2015 Agency 

# Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category: EPA’s Response to Public Comments Part 2 of 10Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 1 1. General Commenter Name: Chris M. Hobson Commenter Affiliation: Southern Company Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4379 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 154 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: While supportive of EPA’s effort to evaluate the current status of the steam electric effluent guidelines, we encourage EPA to consider these comment s and avoid a rush to issue ELG rules that are not defensible or supported by the record. These comments advocate for EPA to: (1) reassess their data, calculations and assumptions used in evaluating the proposed rule technologies, (2) withdraw and re - propo se the rule taking into account our comments and concerns, and (3) allow sufficient opportunity for industry and the public to provide feedback prior to issuance of a final rule. Comment Response: EPA is not "rush[ing] to issue ELG rules that are not def ensible or supported by the record.” EPA has taken the time necessary to develop a rule that is fully documented and supported by the data and information in the record. In addition, EPA conducted a thorough review and evaluation of all public comments s ubmitted on the proposed ELG rule, including those of this commenter, and has carefully considered the public comments in the development of the final rule. EPA notes that the public comment period for the proposed rule was extended 45 days from the origi nal deadline to allow extra time for stakeholder and public participation. Given the process followed by EPA, there is no justification or reason to re propose the rule. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Tr anscript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 148 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: There's been perhaps a false impression left by some of the witnesses that the electric generation sector has not been regulated for effluent guidelines, when a person said not since the 19th century have there been any regulations. Someone else said ther e are not effluent guideline requirements or that we oppose them. At least my organization does not oppose effluentEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 2 guideline revisions. We fully recognize we were up at the plate after you all did your Section, I think, 302 reviews earlier in the decade , and this has not been opposed by, to my knowledge, the industry, but the manner in which the regulations would take place matter to us greatly. Comment Response: The Steam Electric Power Generating effluent limitations guidelines (ELGs) were first prom ulgated in 1974 and were revised in 1982. Most likely, the public comment about the "19th century", referred to by this commenter, is rhetorical exaggeration. EPA notes that the decision to initiate a rulemaking to revise the ELGs for the Steam Electric P ower Generating Point Source Category was made based on the results of EPA’s Clean Water Act section 304 reviews, and EPA's detailed study of the industry, a process that took place over several years and which was completed in 2009.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 3 1.a.i. General Supp ort Commenter Name: S. Russell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please adopt the strongest regulations to protect water ways from point source pollution. EPA studies have strongly indicated the results of decades of negligence and weak regulations; power plants are responsible for the contamination of over half of our water ways. In fact, according to an EPA study, 38% of our water ways are too polluted to consume the fish. This is why the strongest regulations are in order. We need to protect our water ways for our health and quality of life. Comment Response: The final Steam Electric effluent limitation guidelines (ELGs) will strengthen the controls on the discharge of pollutants by coal - fired steam electric power plants to waters of the United States, or into sewage treatment plants, by revising the technology - bas ed standards that apply. The final regulations will reduce the amount of toxic metals, biocaccumulative pollutants and other pollutants discharged to surface waters from steam electric power plants by over 1 billion pounds annually. See the Environmental Assessment for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category (EA Report) (DCN SE04527) for further information on the resulting environmental improvements attributable to the final rule. Commenter Name: P. Trei Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2267 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need to be working on all forms of clean, renewable energy and this is a good start. For those who think dirty energy can't be replaced by clean renewable energy for decades, need to read their history about space travel and all it has done for us. When Pr esident Kennedy proclaimed we would land on the moon in 10 years, NO ONE believed that possible at all, let alone in a decade. But with our talented people we did it well and did it sooner than expected. Let's haveEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 4 THAT kind of attitude and hard work. If w e don't, we may very well be the next great extinction on earth! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: O. Devgan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 2268 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: When one creates an industry or jobs by poluuting or ruining the basic essential of life, it is a slow deat h for the being. Please protect this God given basic essential of life. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Wollitz - Dooley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2269 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. We know a lot more since 1982 when current standards were drafted. Rather than move hazardous coal ash with water, the EPA could require coal plan ts to use dry systems instead. That would eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year! Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and certainlyrequires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 5 We so urgently need to pay attention to pollution consequences. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is sensible, affordable, and already being used by some coal plants. It should be finalized and put into force as soon as possible. Thank you for lis tening. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Kawalek Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2270 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Revie w Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I come from Minnesota, where we value our lakes and rivers immensely. I hope that we can reduce this form of water pollution, and bring even more of the nations' w aterways into compliance with Clean Water Act regulations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. McFall Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2273 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water is a rapidly disappearing resource. With an unsustainable growth rate and ever inc reasing population, we have to act. It will be interesting to see how coal plant operators will explain to their families how the streams and rivers ecame so toxic you can't even wade in them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265 , Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 6 Commenter Name: A. Muchnick Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2274 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that electric generation plants can discharge into our waterways. By requiring coal - fired plants to m ove hazardous coal ash with dry systems, not water, the EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater annually. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is sensible, affordable, and already being used by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollut ion in our water will save lives, prevent illness, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. Please finalize and enforce these standards as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Num ber 1 Commenter Name: L. Frogge Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2275 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Exce rpt: Our beautiful and much needed waterways, lakes, streams, oceans were not created to be contaminated so that they are unsafe for human use whether for human consumption or recreational purposes. Big companies looking at the almighty dollar will soon lose their sources for making that dollar to say nothing of the complete destruction of our much needed clean water and clean air for everyone. Think of your/our children and what this contamination will mean to them in only a few short years It will soon be too late to reverse the destruction that is occurring.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 7 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Frogge Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2 275 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our beautiful and much needed waterways, lakes, streams, oceans were not created to be contaminated so that they ar e unsafe for human use whether for human consumption or recreational purposes. Big companies looking at the almighty dollar will soon lose their sources for making that dollar to say nothing of the complete destruction of our much needed clean water and cl ean air for everyone. Think of your/our children and what this contamination will mean to them in only a few short years It will soon be too late to reverse the destruction that is occurring. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. and K. Swanson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2277 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please...for the sake of our children and grandchildren we beg you to FINALIZE ZERO DISCHARGE WATER POLLUTION STANDARDS TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF TOXIC METALS THAT CAN BE DUMPED INTO OUR WATERS FROM POWER PLANTS!!! Comment Resp onse: For EPA’s rationale for the options selected in the final rule, please see the preamble to the final rule. Also see response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 8 Commenter Name: G. S. Clemson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2278 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We have other options now. NO more letting the dirty energy giants get away with ruining where we all live. No more loopholes/exemptions from the Clean Water Act, one of the most publicly supported Acts in US history. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name : J. Shireley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2279 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 3 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I could care less about the Sierra Club because I don't really know much about them to be honest. What I do know, however, is that pollution on this scale and for this purpose is just asinine. Seriously. I don't know how anyone could disagree with that. Do the right th ing, please. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. James Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2281 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Rev iew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 9 WE HAVE TO START NOW & CLEAN UP OUR WATER BEFORE IT'S TO LATE,THERE WILL COME A DAY THAT WE WON'T BE ABLE TO AFORD TO DO IT,IT'S COME TO THE POINT ALREADY THAT S OME FISH IS NOT SAFE TO EAT & PEOPLE ARE GETTING SICK. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. C. Hernandez Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 2282 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With all do respect today I urge you, along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters, Who ask the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals. That can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Docket No. EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: H. Olson Hull Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2283 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporate d into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Safe drinking water is probably the most important thing for ANY HUMAN BEING or animal - or bird - or living creature. SURELY you can safeguard it for all of us!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Wilson Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 10 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2286 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We are woefully backward in making the U.S. and the world a better place to live. In fact we are trashing our planet. We need to strengthen our regulations so that we can be healthier and leave this planet for many generatio ns to come to enjoy. If we don't, we will have a dead planet. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Flocken Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2288 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please update the rules for ash disposal. Dry disposal will spare thousands of gallons of dangerous ash run - o ff and save water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Hughes Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2289 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Exter nal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge USEPA to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants . By doing so EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of ash and scrubber wastewater every year. At the very least, biological and chemical treatment is needed to remove toxic heavy metals from effluent.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 11 The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest propos ed approach is sensible, affordable, and already being used by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water should be finalized and implemented as soon as possible. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Petty Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2290 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Inc orporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In addition, why would it be okay exactly to ALLOW this pollution to continue, as if that were even a question? Since that's what agencies like the EPA are FOR, correct, to allow people to drink their water? S o is there some reason why we would have to write urgent letters to you to insist that you put in place the strongest safeguards, that you should be just enacting anyway? Because we are sick of our government agencies NOT GOVERNING, NOT LISTENING TO US, AN D LETTING THE RICH CORPORATE MAFIA POISON EVERYBODY, LETTING THEM BADMOUTH GREEN ENERGY WHILE WE WATCH THE PLANET ROAST. WHOSE SIDE IS OUR GOVERNMENT ON? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Grimm Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2292 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Is this for real? Is the EPA using rules established in 1982? How can an agency be so irresponsible to not change their guidelines for waste water in 31 years? That is just insane.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 12 Almost any American would not believe that to be true. However, is seems to be so. IT IS WAY PAST DUE FOR YOU TO BRING THE RULES UP TO DATE!!!!! THANKS FOR LISTENING AND NOW DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Denneen Commenter Affiliatio n: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2293 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a retired Biologist I along with all 2.1 mill ion Sierra Club members and supporters, urge the EPA to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Szabo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2295 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: All I can say is that if anyone is not for cleaning up pollution they should start injesting toxic heavy metals like arsenic, mercury, lead, selenium and all the othes nasties out there and see how they feel in about a year or so. C omment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: N. Huber Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 13 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2296 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No E xternal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is time the older plants on line quit postponing upgrades for their environmental controls because they will be closing soon while another group of engineers are working on the plan for extending their operating permit for another 20 to 40 years. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Dalloo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2297 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I want clean water to drink and the water now is questionable now in some areas. Our planet cann ot take the abuse that industry is constantly bombarding into our environment. Please help protect our planet against these polluters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Moix Commenter Af

filiation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2299 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We simply can't afford to continue on this ruinous path of subsidizing the coal industry with weak regulations while the rest of us suffer the consequences. Of course, they are made up of people who suffer those same consequences but their short term greed keeps them in a state of willful deni al. You must not allow that to continue.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 14 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Hoekstra Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2301 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's over the years that the Environmental Protection Agency hasn't done enough to effectively end power plants dumping of toxic m etals into our waterways. It is in keeping selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead from contaminating our waterways that the EPA must finalize zero - discharge systems using dry systems in dealing with coal ash as well as the sludge from smokestack scrubbers. E nsuring that our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat needs to be the goal and objective of the agency. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Seiman Commenter Affiliation: Privat e Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2302 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: If you haven't gotten it by now, I'm afraid, you will neve r get it. We are sure that the Earth will no longer support human life, we just don't know when. Give us a little more time. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Harrington Commenter Affili ation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2303 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 15 Comment Excerpt: Please set zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and response to EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Humphrey Commenter A ffiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2304 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It leaves me with a sick sort of amusme nt that my neighbor can get cited or arrested for letting its dog mess in my yard,but energy companys whos only purpose is to make money can poisen my environment and expect ot get aw ay with it as course of Business. Along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Heckman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2305 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, the EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be tre ated using zero - discharge systems. EPA can immediately require biological and chemical treatment to remove toxins like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. My grandchildren also thank you, and will see a day when coal is no longer king!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 16 The E.P.A's strongest proposed approach is eminently sensible, affordable, and already being used by some coal plants. It should be finalized and enforced as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Comment er Name: J. Hanniver Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2306 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: My fat her's brother, a former miner and stripmine truck driver, his daughter and his grandson all died of coal - caused cancer. Now, along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharg e water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. This is not all we need, but it's a start. By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, t he EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals lik e selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Erickson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2307 - A1 Comment E xcerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Along with other Sierra Club members and supporters, I urge the EPA to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit t he amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. It doesn't make sense to dispose of fly ash from coal into water; dry disposal is safer. The EPA's strongest proposed approach is common - sense, affordable, and already in use; it should go into effect immediately.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 17 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Troeh Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2308 - A1 Comment Excerp t Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please heed Dkhw'Duw'Absh (Duwamish) Chief Si'ahl's (Seattle) wise admonition when he said, "What happens to Mother Earth happens to Mot her Earth's children." She is a living being who has sustained untold abuse, due to the pollution of Her sacred air, land, and waters, through predominantly war and industry. We have a vital symbiotic relationship with Her. REQUIRE coal plants to move haz ardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water. REQUIRE zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Take care of Mother Earth and all Her precious children! Sh e's the only one we have! Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and response to EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Kelemen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2309 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please take a more active approach to protecting our environment. The damage that we are doing now will be left to our children to clean up. And our children will write the history that will judge our actions. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 18 Commenter Name: E. Dovichin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docum ent Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2310 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The following paragraphs have been researched and composed by other committed and caring citizens, yet I ask you to respect my agreement with the requests for good sense here. Along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pol lution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Hughes Commenter Affiliation: Private Citize n Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2312 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discha rge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters. It is obvious that the most sensible, most critical, and least expensive way to protect something as fundamental as water is to not poison it in the firs t place. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Schmidt Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2314 - A1 Comme nt Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 19 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As the saying goes:"Always do your best. And when you know better, do better" Keeping a toxic waste ruling in place that was en acted 30 years ago does not comply with this very useful maxim. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Anker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 2315 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As we look for new energy sources, it's important to begin with a level playing field. The coal power stations need to operate as we expect other energy sources to operate - with the minimum amount of hazardous emissions. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Armbruster Commenter Affiliation: Priva te Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2317 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Let's make changes now for a cleaner future. Comment Res ponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 20 Commenter Name: E. and R. Deming Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2318 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Ext ernal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: You're the EPA; stop kowtowing to money and do what your title says:PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT. Stop your hypocrisy and money pandering and: DO WHAT YOUR OATH OF OFFICE REQUIRES. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. Hopkins Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2319 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: N o External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Of course another solution would be to ban the burning of coal altogether. It is the dirtiest fuel we have. There are alternatives. But in the meantime best to make what we do burn as clean as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Castiano Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2321 - A1 Comment Excerpt N umber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: How many different ways can we say it? We MUST HAVE clean water in order to LIVE! The MORE toxic waste that is allowed to be dumped into OU R water sources, the closer to KILLING us you let these DAMN power companies come! Is that REALLY THE GOAL??????Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 21 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: F. Prael Commenter Affiliation: Private C itizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2325 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, the EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can be treated using zero - discharge systems, and biological and chemical treatment can remove toxic heavy metals l ike selenium, arsenic, mercury and lead. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposal is sensible, affordable and already being used by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives, allow children to be healt hier and ensure that our water is safe to drink and our fish safeto eat. It should be put into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: E. Schousboe Commenter Affiliatio n: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2328 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I'm very disturbed that the water pollution limi ts for coal plants has not been updated since the 1980s, when the anti - environment Regan administration was in control. Seriously? What is this? My family have stopped buying almost all fish because nearly all seafood and freshwater fish contains massive m ercury pollution caused by coal - fired power - plants. My family is LUCKY to have the education to know about this danger, and the money to afford other food that supposedly has less mercury. How is it still acceptable to you that these utilities are poisonin g families with deadly neurotoxins?Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 22 ANY amount of neurotoxins poured into our drinking water is too much. Coal - fired power plants must be forced to stop poisoning people. This is a matter of human health and human rights. Comment Response: See response t o DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Higbee - Sudyka Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2330 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is time that we require coal plants to take responsibility for their waste. That will mean that we as consumers will pay the true cost of coal, which will shift the responsibility to us as well. P lease, you can do this! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Schafer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2331 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We are surrounded by our marvelous Great Lake, >>>>>Lake ichigan, and we expect that iat is p rotected for our children and grandchilldres. This is o ur gift....and ours to rptect. This is the responsibiligty of this agency. Do so for All! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Buck Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2332 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 23 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We must take action NOW as we are getting nerar to the point where we won't b e able to turn back the effects of the pollution we have allowed to date. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Spicer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2334 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We had, get that had! the clean water act since the early 70s Not much has been done!! The main po lluters bought their way out.This bigmoney coal burning polluters have also bought their way out while the citizens suffer their pollutants!! It's time these acts were acted upon!! Start working for the people!!NOT the pocket padders!! Comment Response: S ee response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: N. Frazer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2335 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ext ernal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Mahalo for your service to our nation. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 24 Commenter Name: G. Williams Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2336 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: If the EPA makes plants move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, we can get rid of literally millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater ever y year. Smokestack scrubber sludge must also be treated using zero - discharge systems. Use your common - sense, affordable, approach to these issues. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Taylo r Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2337 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Someone need to put these companies in check and jail for destroying America, why are they so intent on destroying every stream, lake, wood land, valley and mountain. A stop to this madness is needed immediately if not sooner. I, and many other's are hoping you can do. Comment Res ponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. L. Davis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2339 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 25 I, along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters, urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. This is not only toxic to Us but to the Flora and Fauna of where we live! By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, EPA can eliminate m illions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, m ercury, and lead. All these are known lethal poisons to Mankind and have to be eliminated! The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is common - sense, affordable, and is already being used by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives, prevent Children and Adults from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our Fish safe to eat. It should be finalized and go into force as soon as possible. This is Urgent!!! Comment Response: See re sponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: W. Bowman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2341 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This is a no brainer. Our children's future, and actually very lives, depend on us leaving them a cl ean, sustainable and habitable planet.Clean air and water are ( I think we can all agree on this ) two of the most essential ingredients in life. Please vote for zero - discharge standards Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Goodwiin Commenter Affiliat ion: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2342 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 26 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am an eighth grade Earth Science teacher at an honors prep school. My students and I studied freshwater resources, water treatment, and water conservation this past Spring. This is a topic that was fascinating to them and also something they cared deeply about. Please act quickly for their benefit a nd the well - being of all future generations! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: W. Heiland Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2344 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We have to realize that potable water is very important for life. And there is a limited amount at any given time in most areas of the world. So we must do everything in our power to protect this most valuable resource. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Lian Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2349 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please do all you can to stop this toxic discharge from going into our water systems! This is a very basic need and I'm counting on our government to help keep our environment clean. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 27 Commenter Name: W. Scott Commenter Affiliation: Private Citize n Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2351 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: For full disclosure, I didn't personally write this letter, but I have read it and agree with it fully. We only have one planet, and it needs to be protected for the future of civilization. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Schwartz Commenter Affiliat ion: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2352 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: IN THE NAME OF AMERICANS' HUMAN DIGNITY, PLEAS E DO MUCH MORE TO PROTECT US FROM THE TOXIC EFFECTS OF WASTE WATER FROM COAL PLANTS. IT TRULY IS THE RIGHT TIME........... Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Erkiletian Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2354 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Dear EPA. Please require coal plants t o move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, 350! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 28 Commenter Name: H. and A. Shapiro Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2355 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Along with clean air, clean water free of industrial waste and pollution will be the next da nger to our health and ecosystem. You are charged with protecting us from these dangers. If this isn't accomplished your agency is a waste of taxpayer money. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Nam e: R. Schamel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2356 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We have the t echnological capability to treat and remove toxic waste from water and pollutants from the air. As the #1 consumer of the world's resources we should be the #1 protector of the air, water and ecology of the world in order that life on earth may continue to exist. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: E. ONeill Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2357 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 29 In solidarity with 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize and strengthen zero - discharge water polluti on standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Until coal plants can be eliminated in favor of greener solutions, limiting the amount of pollution coming from them in our water will save lives, preven t children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink. Standards should be finalized and go into force as soon as possible. Thank you very much for your time and for protecting our environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - O W - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. Duff Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2358 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated int o Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is time. No, it is way over time that action be taken to clean up all water in all of our states. Enough of inaction and pleasing special interest group, and the endless pursuits of the lobbyists. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Lawson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2359 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Exter nal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It seems ridiculous that we even have to talk about regulations for the coal industry at this time! With their record of safety violations and lack of care for the environment, it should be a giv en that they be as tightly regulated as is possible when it comes to toxic waste! Water is such a precious resource that increased stringent safeguards need to be in place concerning coal fired power plants! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 30 Commenter Name: M. Schramm Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2360 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Every citizen in the US is entitled to clean water, fish, and coral reefs. Profit, greed, and bogus claims are stealing this right, Stop now! Act morally. The Environmental Protection Agency must enact zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Burns Commenter Affiliation: Privat e Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2361 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It already is apparent to the majority of educated citizen s, that the hazardous practices of the past have negatively affected our environment, and even nay - sayers now believe that global warming is real . I urge the EPA to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Lets move forward in protecting our environment and lives, not backwards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: E. Danson Commenter Affiliati on: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2363 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 31 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The country's waters should not be treated as a dumping - ground for waste that poisons them and all the life they support -- fish, wildlife, and local populations. The U.S. should be acting differently from China in this regard. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt N umber 1 Commenter Name: J. Black Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2364 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Exc erpt: I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Why not? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Miller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2365 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Re sponse: No Comment Excerpt: While this may cost the coal industry a modicum extra now, it will save orders of magnitude more than that in less disease and healthier, more productive lives of the residents of the US, and likely other areas of North Americ a as well! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 32 Commenter Name: W. Johnson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2366 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Re view Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As long as we continue to rely on coal for electrical generation, we should at least make the harm done from using coal as little as possible. We are making progress and this next step will certainly help. It's time to stop pretending it's o.k. -- using coal doesn't hurt that much. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. C. Herman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2367 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a mother of two, I care deeply about air and water pollution because of the harmful effects on our children and their development. It i s essential that our pollution standards adequately protect America's most precious resource - our people. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: V. Cotts Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2369 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 33 As an RN since '77, I have far too much experience with people who have cancers and other diseases from pollution. Aside from critical care and home care, I have done workers comp case management. In CO, I have had Rocky Flats patients. I married a chemist in '75 who received an MS in Environmental Engineering in '79. He was hired out of grad school by Hooker Chemicals. He went on to become the first Director of Hazardous Waste at AK DEC. Learned all about how the oil companies walk the bills into the legislators' offices and get them passed, while he could hardly get a de cent amount of conference time with them. He went to the Anchorage water treatment plant as supervisor, and spearheaded a hazardous household waste drop off for the city. He worked for a national engineering company and then became a private contractor. In addition to working several companies on the slope as a contractor, he worked the Valdez oil spill. Where he learned the regs he put in place to require spill equipment to be located in one accessible spot and to have annual spill drills, had stopped bein g enforced. The equipment was scattered, the response was a travesty. On top of the fact that Exxon was 5 years behind the regs for the tankers to be double hulled. The environmental damage, economic disaster and the number of people who became sick workin g and living in the spill area should have been a huge wake up call. The companies are not going to cut into their profits unless the government makes them. The coal companies already destroy the health of miners by not protecting them from coal dust. The water pollution is next, and then the smoke stacks. All of this places a financial burden on tax payers and everyone with health insurance. The regulations have to be updated AND enforced. Please. America is losing more of it's exceptionalism every day. Co mment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: W. Bieganek Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2371 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Without clean water nothing lives. We need to address the pollution of our water systems. Our environmental regulations simply are not protecting our water. Why are the larg est polluters exempt from clean water standards? Big business does not have to follow our clean water standards in Energy Production (Oil, gas, and Coal), Mining and Industrial Agriculture. They use the most water and pollute the most water. It is obvious big business and their lobbyingEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 34 control our government and our regulations. As as small business owner I am not exempt from clean water regulations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. B. Gregory Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2372 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Coal - fired power pla nts produce more toxic waste than any other industry in the United States, including the chemical, plastic, and paint manufacturing industries. They spew millions of pounds of pollutants into our waters every year -- and they'll keep at it as long as Reaga n - era EPA rules go unchanged. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. J. Foster Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2374 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With more people, there will inevitably be more pollution. We need to modernize anti - pollution laws now. It is insane to allow TOXIC mate rials into the air and water we need to survive, as insane as taki ng poison right out of a bottle. Allowing companies to poison us, "we the people", is amoral and unjustified. Please support zero - discharg e water pollution standards that limit (and maybe s omeday eliminate) the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 35 Commenter Name: M. Monroe Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docu ment Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2378 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In 2013, we know that water can simply not hold the waste from coal powe red energy sources without catastrophic damage. We need to end the practice of dumping coal waste to water completely. If this means we need to phase out coal - fired power plants entirely, so be it. There would be interim steps, however. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Singer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2379 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Coal - fired plants need to be phased out of our energy infrastructure. While we still have them, we must do everything possible to minimize the damage they cause. This is one of those actions . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. J. Searcy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2380 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Fla g: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 36 I just don't understand how anybody could ever, for any reason, justify dumping poison into the water we drink -- the water that life itself depends upon. All the money a nd power (political and electrical) in the universe can never equal the value of clean water, for anybody -- ever. We have been doing wrong things for wrong reasons. We can fix that. We can do right things for right reasons. We have government -- we have the EPA -- specifically to prevent "the tragedy of the commons." I am very grateful for this, and wish you great success in this endeavor. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Byrnes Commenter A ffiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2382 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the Environmental Protection Age ncy to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Please require coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems rather than with water, so the EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and requires biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. The EPA's strongest proposed approach is common - sense, affordable, and is already being used by some coal plants. Please limit pollution in our water to save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and ou r fish safe to eat as soon as possible. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Carlson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2384 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 37 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please, stand up to the coal industry. Government regulation is our only hope: they won't fix i t themselves! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Higgins Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2385 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. The Enviro nmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is common - sense, affordable, and is already being used by some coal plants. Let's make it a gift to our children and grandchildren! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exc erpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Grossmann Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2386 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No C omment Excerpt: By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated usingEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 38 zero - discharg e systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals. We must protect our clean air and water for future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: W. Dietrich Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2387 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water and air are what sustains us to live on Earth. Without these resources humanity will die. Increasing populations are stressing these two resources. If you do nothing, then what. Fix it now! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Hays Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2388 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In the business world, upgrades and improvements are expected. Water quality is one of the premier variables in a healthy nation and economy. US standards have languished while technology for testing & information about toxi cology has kept moving. Clean water needs to be a priority especially with regard to the rising cost of health care. One important part of keeping costs down is keeping US potable water as clean as possible. Applying some of what we now points the way to zero - discharge water pollution standards limiting the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants -- wouldn't that be a great start! By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water , EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. SmokestackEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 39 scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. All very good options to ensure clean water! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. N. (Carole) Madan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document C ontrol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2391 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Make a name for yourself by publicly declaring war on any company that pollute s water and the environment. This is your chance to really make a difference in the lives of all Americans. As a mother and grandmother, I take actions every day to make this a better and cleaner society - please help me. Comment Response: See response t o DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Loeser Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2392 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean Water is essential to life, and is a limited resource. There are many ways to make energy, but clean water is the only thing we can drink. People may not drink it straight from the tap, preferring it flavored with sugar or alcohol, but they are still drinking water. We must safeguard our water, and the government is the only method of doing that. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 40 Commenter Name: J. Wei nstein Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2393 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Pro tection Agency's strongest approach is common - sense, affordable, and is already being used by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives and health. It should be finalized and in force as soon as possible. Comment Resp onse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Walker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2395 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Re view External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: EVERY SINGLE DAY, THIS EARTH IS SHRINKING AND DYING A LITTLE BIT. COAL WASTE IN THE WATER SURE DOESN'T HELP! GO FORWARD, NOT BACKWARDS, AND DO THE RIGHT AND ONLY THING FOR EVERYONE AND THE PLANET~ NOW!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Tkacz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2396 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 41 I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize ZERO - DISCHARGE WATER POLLUTION standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumpe d into our waters from power plants. By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water w ill save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. It should be finalized and go into force as soon as possible. LIFE ON EARTH CANNOT EXIST WITHOUT CLEAN WATER! Comment Response: See respons e to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. Ray Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2397 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: yes, please get this done! and enforced soon. Along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Scoble Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Contro l Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2398 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 42 I was not that active 30 years ago,I was selfish,More interested in my career than if I would be being poisoned in 2013.Things are different now, I want my Kids and their kids to have clean water and air,so let's get on with it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. Crayne Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2399 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's time to recognize the importance to our world - not just to our country - of keeping our water supplies everywhere as clear and clean as possible. The EPA is our line of defense. Please finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. and W. MacDonald Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2400 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Rev iew Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Additionally, this will ensure a larger amount of clean water available for more significant uses. Water is not an infinite source. We need to learn to use it wisely. This action will do much to achieve that goal. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 43 Commenter Name: L. Brimecombe Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2401 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Externa l Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need to save our waters before it's too late. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. O Reilly Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2402 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: PLEASE LIMIT WATER POLLUTION FROM COAL BURNING PLANTS!!! Take action now, its really important for all of our health and well being. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Marquardt Commenter Affiliation: Pri vate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2403 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: 1982 was a long time ago; I was just 10 years into a 32 year career in public education as a teacher and counselor, and it was also the last time EPA wrote regulations for Coal Industry toxic waste disposal. I'm retired not, and along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters, I urge the Environm ental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge waterEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 44 pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Comme nter Name: M. Olafson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2407 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our k nowledge of the world and science has changed since water regulations were first created. We need to update the regulations to account for that knowledge and create a safer, more sustainable planet for all of us. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. Rosner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2409 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpora ted into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Obviously, the scientific body of evidence that has accumulated since the EPA passed its standards in 1982 has dramatically changed our understanding of the terrible effects that coal burning byproducts have on our water sources. Its long past time for the EPA to update its standards to 21st century levels. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. Barnes Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2410 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 45 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Access to safe water is one of the most important public health concerns. It is time to move forward into an era that prioritizes a clean, safe environment for the sake of ourselves and future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Craig Commenter Affili ation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2411 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would really love to have clean air and wa ter all around me. It is not like many things in that one cannot buy clean air and water. They can only come about when polluters are required to stop polluting. That is what the EPA is for. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. Rowntree Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2412 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: it is time to use our new technologies to really "clean up our act". The costs of doing this would in time be balanced out by having a healthy population and now and much lower health care in the future. Our most costly diseases are brought on by environmental factors. We will not resolve our health care crisis until Americans live healthy live styles.We have a lot to do, but it is really difficult to make much progress when the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the food we eat are contaminated with substances that poison us.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 46 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Horch Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2415 - A1 C omment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have worked in powerplants most of my career. by far the dirtiest are coal fired plants. The sooner we find a replacement for them the better off we will be. we can not continue to polute the planet for economic gain. We need to think about tomorrows children today! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Steven s Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2416 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In 2013, when the science on ecosystems, waters and toxins is established and readily available, there should be no place for dumping of toxic waste into our waters. We live on a very small planet and water is a precious resource. We need to guard our waters, not contaminate them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Wishingrad Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2417 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag : No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 47 Comment Excerpt: Along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters as well as other Americans, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous a sh wastewater every year. Water's properties make it an easy conductor of hazardous waste; let's eliminate this possibility. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemica l treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Hunt Commenter Affiliation: Pri vate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2419 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I particularly remember the toxic sludge the Tennessee Valley Authority dumped all over Harriman from its coal - powered Kingston steam plant because I used to live near there. I'd like to keep on having a hometown to visit rather than a ghost town. Please update the rules so we don't have a repeat. Comment Resp onse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Berg Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2420 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Revi ew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 48 If we do not do something now what is to come of our future generations? This a very important issue to be finalized. We as humans need clean water and air to survive on this earth. If we do not take actions now what will become of our sea life and of humankind. There is one earth on which we live we need to do all we can to survive. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Li mpert Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2421 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach to cleaning smokestack scrubber sludge is common - sense, affordable, and is already being used by some coal plants to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. It should be finalized and go into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Hauter Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2423 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Re sponse: No Comment Excerpt: It is time to start moving forward again with environmental protections. I don't know about you, but there is no one of my acquaintance who can live without the bounty of the earth, and that's the way we are heading. Please do your part to save the human beings. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 49 Commenter Name: V. Brownfield Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2424 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We're destroying our planet for our grandchildren's grandchildren for the sake of money and power. How can we sleep knowing this is happening and not do anything about it. I fully support this message. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Young Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2425 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In West Virginia, we have been warned/advised NOT to eat beyond a certain amount of fish caught in ou r rivers, streams and lakes. Even more warnings of caution go out to those women that are pregnant. I'm sorry, but does no one else see a problem with this? Yes, we produce, burn and ship coal in this state. We need more government oversight to demand that the coal producers and our local EPA sets higher standards to protect our people. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: N. Flaherty Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Num ber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2427 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 50 I join all 2.1 million Sierra Club affiliates to urge the EPA to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards that limit the power plant toxic metals dumped into our waters. EPA can require coal plants to remove hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, thus eliminating millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater e very year. The EPA's strongest proposed approach is common - sense, affordable, and is already being used by some coal plants. Keeping our water safe to drink saves lives. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Co mmenter Name: M. Allen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2429 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We'r e tired of pollution fallout from coal. It's bad enough that we continue to produce things that are dependent on coal, seeing as how fossil fuels are not part of a sustainable future. At the very least we need to do things RIGHT when exploiting this outmod ed fuel. The Environmental Protection Agency needs to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards and thereby limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. These private companies should have no right to ruin public water; I really want NONE of ther waste dumped into OUR water! Technology already exists to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, and they can and should treat Smokestack scrubber sludge using zero - discharge systems, and biological and chemical treatment can remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. There is no excuse NOT to use these cleaner methods, and it's your responsibility to make them. What's stopping you? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Burgess Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2432 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 51 Comment Excerpt: In an era where every source of clean water is critical to our growing population and businesses who need it, EPA must safeguard the quality and quantify of this finite key resource today even if -- an d because -- those who need it refuse to take these steps themselves. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Drake Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 2433 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is very easy for Washington to sit there and call us 'Special Interest Groups' and iggnore the admonishments; however, you need to consider that the people whispering in your other ear about the amounts they will provide your campaign, are truly the special interest group, and their interest is not about the people or the earth - it is about their p ockets. Please take steps to stop killing the Earth and her inhabitants by outdated and gudelines. Take positive steps to help safeguard Earth and her children. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Franzen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2434 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: These comp anies have taken advantage and made the profits and like other businesses it is time to correct the short comings because cheap energy wasn't cheap - there is not so much profit to be made and it is time to put it back, it is very simple to see and we will not let them get away with ruining our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 52 Commenter Name: G. Vaccaro Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2435 - A1 Comm ent Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This is a common sense, long overdue measure that needs to be approved. Any survey of the American public would show overwhelm ing support for all these standards. The EPA would simply be honoring its duty to serve the people with the passage of these standards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Garber Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2436 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Potomac has beavers. Lake Erie do esn't catch fire. We've come a long way, but fish from the Great Lakes are still considered too toxic for pregnant and nursing women, which means we still have a long way to go. Clean water means healthier children and jobs in remediation and restoration w ork. Update the laws to reflect current science and technology. Then tell the mothers and fathers what you are proposing and how it affects health, particularly children's health. Wake the sleeping lion. The public will have your back. Comment Response: S ee response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Boots Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2438 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Exte rnal Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 53 Comment Excerpt: Thank you for realizing water is a prime sustenance of life for wildlife and humans. It cost too much to clean up after we've sullied the resource and degraded entire watersheds so let's get sma rt and not pollute it first off. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Landau Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2439 - A1 Comment Excerpt Nu mber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The single most important thing we can leave as a legacy to future generations is a clean, un polluted planet. CLEAN AIR AND CLEAN WATER need to come before the prerogatives of industrial interests. The single most important Federal Agency, therefore, is the Environmental Protection Agency. If you don't do it, then who will? If you don't do it NOW, then it will be too late. No matter who yo ur politically appointed director is, you must prioritize environmental health over corporate profits. Our children and grandchildren, as well of those of the other creatures who share this planet with us, deserve no less than that. History has proven that the money we spend up - front, preventing pollutants from entering the environment is much less than the cost of cleaning up the mess afterwards. It has also proven that, when a clean - up is necessary, it is less expensive to clean up a small spill of pollut ants than a large one. So please, don't let the problem compound. Pass the necessary regulations now to stop pumping toxic chemicals into our air and water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Weber Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2440 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 54 We cannot afford to burden our grandchildren with our own failure to be adults. The time is now. Do the right thing. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: Sierra Club Mass Email Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2441 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporter s, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry system s, rather than with water, the EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemical treatment to r emove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is sensible, affordable, and already being used by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will sa ve lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. It should be finalized and put into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. Anderson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2443 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Thanks to EPA's lack of regulation, I have been on he receiving end of many health issues due to mercury, lead and other metals in my blood stream. This has been a nightmare for me and myEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 55 family. I'm begging you to clean up your act, as well as our envir onment. Does it ever occur to you that you and your love ones could become terminally ill from all the pollution you allow? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: E. Perez Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2445 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a mother, and one who routinely uses waterways, lakes, and ponds for recreation, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. We now know how dramatically exposur e to mercury and lead can impact children's development, and we must take action to limit the presence of these and other toxic heavy metals, like selenium and arsenic, in our waterways and our fish. By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemical treatme nt to remove these toxic heavy metals. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is common - sense, affordable, and is already being used by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives, prevent chil dren from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. It should be finalized and go into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. and P. Norris Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2446 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 56 The SCIENCE IS AVAILABLE TO DO THIS. And while it will cost the industry money, it is not prohibitive. It can and must be done for the sake of our health and well being. The industry has billions of dollars -- surely they can comply with higher standards. If they can't, t hen they need to go away and make room for cleaner energy sources. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Adams Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 2447 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our Children and Grandchildren deserve the clean water we have be enjoying don't let big money use up are precious water this way. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. and J. Richey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2449 - A1 Comment Excerpt Num ber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: My daughter and family live in West Virginia and I did NOT raise her to die in that alien environment. Senator Jay Rockefeller is moving on a nd I don't blame him. It is time for the EPA to do their job. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: E. Swenson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 2452 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 57 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our nation is not the only nation spewing industrial toxins into the earth's air and water, but the United Sta tes must lead the world and set a positive example by implementing and enforcing good environmental practices. Time is running out for us. The point of no return is looming. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Oxnard Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2453 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I graduated from high school in 1982, when big hair, big glasses and big shoulder pads were in fashion. I've changed exponentially since then, but alas, not so much the rules and regulations governing coal waste water. It's time for an up - to - date makeover , EPA! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Weber Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2454 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Fl ag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please update the regulations regarding Coal power plant emissions which have been in place since the 80's! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 58 Commenter Name: K. Kilchenstein Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2455 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It was time for the "Environmental Protection Agency"to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants, DECADES ag o. By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is common - sense, affordable, and is already being used b y some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. There's no time left, and there is no excuse that is acceptable for furth er delaying what must be done. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Robertson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2461 - A1 Comment Excerpt N umber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It remains of utmost importance to continue to care for our water to the best of our ability. Clean water is one of our most precious resources; we need to take stewardship of our natural resourcesEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 59 seriously or pay the ultimate price of creating insurmount able problems for the future health of the planet. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. Collord Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2462 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a local organizer of the original Earth Day when I was in college, I certainly did not expect to still be fighting the same battles in my sixties. Along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our wate rs from power plants. By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - disc harge systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Dunne Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2464 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Thirty years is an aw fully long time. How will we ever get better if we cling to the standards of the past? Please set a new standard for a new age. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 60 Commenter Name: A. Peat Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2469 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: 1982 was the year the EPA wrote our cu rrent safeguards against coal plants dumping their toxic byproducts into our waters. We've come a long way since 1982. We know a lot more about the toxins that coal plants dump into pits, ponds, lakes, and streams. Coal - fired power plants produce more toxi c waste than any other industry in the United States, including the chemical, plastic, and paint manufacturing industries. They spew millions of pounds of pollutants into our waters every year. It's time to move past 1982. Comment Response: See response t o DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Ryden Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2470 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review I ncorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Do the socially and morally responsible thing and take action on this NOW. You know it is the right thing to do. Be responsible to the electorate, citizens like you and your family, take care of us. That is what we elected you to do. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Hornbostel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2471 - A1 Comment Excerpt Numb er: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 61 I sign this petition with all passion possible, for without safe and clean water we are damning the future generations that follow ours. While each of us live, we owe the past for what we have, carry the burden as stewarts of today and the resposibility for what the future holds. Please keep in your heart and mind to act with wisdom and accountability for the children still unborn. Comment Respo nse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Luczyski Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2472 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External R eview External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We can't wait until mass people are dying from what will occur when our water is to tainted to fix. You owe us all good decision making, not for one quarter for some company profits bu t for the nation of people, plants and other animals to survive for a future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: F. Benson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2476 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Coal and Gas may have new technology, but they are not regulating their waist products. It is time to update regulations to control the pollution from these industries. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 62 Commenter Name: E. Gendron Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2477 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We are already loosing clean water sources at an alarming rate. Is our government going to wait until people are dying due to lack of clean drinking water....oops they already are! What the heck is wrong with you guys, protect clean water NOW! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Sims Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2478 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the Environmental Pr otection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year and save millions of gallons of water. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is common - sense, affordable, and is already being used by some coal plants (I would hope this means that this is not t oo controversial). Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. It will protect wildlife, commerce and those to whom we send drinkable wat er overseas. It should be finalized and go into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 63 Commenter Name: C. Opderbeck Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2479 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I beseech you! Thank you in advance for your anticipated efforts at keeping coal waste out of o ur precious water! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Arizmendi Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2480 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Ex ternal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As we all know even with the most stringent laws in place there will still be polluters. Without the laws in place we might as well given them a free h and. This is tantamount to suicide! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: F. Muraski - Stotz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2482 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I know first - hand how dangerous coal production by - products can be. In internship at Argonne National Lab, I was part of a project thatEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 64 demonstrated the carcinogenic effects of coal byproducts. And quite frankly, the findings were 'old news' even then. There has long been ample evidence of the serious health consequences of coal production byproducts and heavy metals. These things sh ould be kept out of our waters!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. Rakow Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2483 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead definitely should not be dumped into our waters from the power plants. We want safe water for both people and animal use. Please make sure that our drinking water is safe for everybody!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Fleming Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2484 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: A few things have happened, been discovered, since the EPA rules we re drawn up in 1982. I think it is time for an update. The other thing Senate can do is advise and consent on your appointment. The question is which effort is the hardest. Please have someone in this administration think outside the box to achieve some ac tion. Inside the box thinking is not working. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 65 Commenter Name: C. A. Rittenhouse Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2485 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: If you care about our country, you will work to stop dropping ANY TOXIC CHEMICALS into our land and water. THANK YOU FO R WHATEVER IMPROVEMENTS YOU CAN MAKE IN THE WORLD OF YOUR FAMILY AND MINE. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Spencer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2486 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: One Earth. One love. We can't control the things we've already done to our fragile Earth but we c an control the precautions we take for the future. We can't afford to wait any longer. We have to protect what we have left of the Earth to ensure future generations can live here too! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerp t Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Krasen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2490 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 66 Coal fired power plants have been pouring coal ash into ponds for years, and creating unfathomable toxic waste dumps. Every once in a while, one of the ponds over flows, or the containment breaks, contaminating ground water. We don't need any m ore of this. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Johnson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2491 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External R eview Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency should finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Fowler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2492 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The global economy and our U.S. economy will not well (if at all) as our environment continues to be degraded. Please think beyond NOW and business lobbying interests. Upgrade and update our pollution control standards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. Halbig Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2496 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 67 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I've worked on water quality issues for 22 years with Floyds Fork Environmental Association. It is i mperative that these metals and other toxics not end up in wastewater because wastewater treatment does not effectively remove all the heavy metals. Therefore, what escapes goes into our rivers and streams and can affect aquatic lifeforms that if eaten can bioaccumulate in mankind. It is of utmost importance to treat such toxics at the source and not let it end up in our waterways. Thank you for your help to work toward clean water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt N umber 1 Commenter Name: L. Lucas Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2497 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Exc erpt: West Virginia and other states in the Appalachians are bearing the cost of this pollution - in - the name - of - energy for our whole country, while energy and mining company CEOs are are collecting the profits. It's not right. You may think that most Appa lachians are opposed to a strong EPA presence, here, but that's not true. What is true is that the other side is often louder and ruder. There are plenty of people who value clean water I also submit that surely our kids, grandkids and great grandkids won' t have a chance to have a voice in preserving our waterways unless you do something now. You know, also, that in areas where these toxins are introduced into the water, there is a greater number of birth defects, right? http://www.sciencedirect.com/science /article/pii/S0013935111001484 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Miller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2498 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 68 Comment Excerpt Numb er: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This is the purpose of the EPA and it must not shirk its responsibility to the nation! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: E. Robinson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2499 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Re sponse: No Comment Excerpt: Please see that the Environmental Protection Agency finalizes zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Chabot Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2500 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I belong to the Sierra Club because they focus on issues of the greatest importance to our family. Preserving our drinking water, saving fish habitats and local resources is more that vital to what we leav e behind for future generations. Please finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 69 This is so vital to our health it can't be overemphasized. We depend on the EPA for protection of our water resources. They have been irreparably compromised and many communities have literally died due to lack of potable water, from chemical spills and industrial pollutants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Gleeson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2502 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: There are no losses to this plan (except to the pockets of the polluters) and all gains. For the sake of the citizens who are your real bosses, just do it! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exc erpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. E. Mellon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2505 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No C omment Excerpt: As a Sierra club supporter, I am shocked to learn that the EPA has not yet finalized zero discharge water pollution standards. It sickens me to know that power plants yearly continue to waste millions of gallons of precious water, produce millions of gallons of dangerous wastewater, dump toxic metals into our waterways, and expose our families to toxic heavy metals which accumulate and are poisonous. Young children with developing bodies and brains get sick from exposure to these toxic sub stances. Lead poisoning, for example, impacts learning potential and has life altering implications. The American people have the right to drink clean water and do not want to consume food(fish) contaminated with toxins. There are a number of things that t he EPA should do right away to help mitigate some of these problems:instead of wasting water, require coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dryEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 70 systems, treat smokestack scrubber sludge using zero - discharge systems, require at least biological and ch emical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Bird Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control N umber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2513 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: After visiting China a couple times recently, I am even more inclined to support safe water for this planet. The homes on streams and rivers dump their waste into the public water causing the Great Canal, for instance, to be in need of constant removal of sludge. I so want us to address the problem at its source and not when its out in the public area. We will otherwise be killing ourselves. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Seawell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2516 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I want my water as clean as it should be, I don't want to be drinking toxic water. The river b y my house is drying up and I want water to be stopped for use in wastewater disopsal!!! We need it to drink and we need it clean. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Kingston Commenter Af

filiation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 71 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2517 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am shocked and disappointed that this is still occuring! Please act definitively and quickly - without bending to industry pressure. Aquatic life is being assualted from many fronts: residual pharmaceuticals, ground source contaminants, storm runoff, and a host of other pollutants from industr y. Evidence abounds in fish and in rapidly dwindling amphibian populations that the assault to waterways is unacceptable. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: E. Averill Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2518 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I agree with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members a nd supporters on all of the above. Moreover, if doing it right is too expensive, then let's get moved off of this poisonous CO2 generating fuel before we tip over on climate change. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt N umber 1 Commenter Name: D. Murphy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2521 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 72 We have been lied to long enough by the coal mongers and we are paying attention like never before. The American people are taking their country back and will no longer pay the price with our health and that of our children. EPA needs to do it's job and stop the insanity of coal polluters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Margolis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2523 - A1 Com ment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: If we continue to allow our water to be polluted by profit - oriented corporations, what will we do when there's no longer clea n water to drink. Even profit - oriented corporations need water to drink. PLEASE EPA DEFEND CLEAN WATER. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Stark Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Do cument Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2524 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We all are becoming gravely aware of how water is becoming the next gold for the world. Without safe clean water for all on this planet WE WILL NOT SURVIVE AS A PLANET WITH HEALTHY LIVING CREATURES. Common sense approaches need to be ACTED ON NOW. Wasted Time is not in our favor, economically or health wise. Comment Respon se: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 73 Commenter Name: D. Neuendorff Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2527 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The most valuable natural resource we will have this century is potable water. We must do everything we can to preserve and protect this national resource. Protecting our fresh water from pollution should be one of our nation's sacred duties to the future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: N. McDaniel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2529 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to institute zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. S mokestack scrubber sludge also can be treated using zero - discharge systems, and requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest prop osed approach is common - sense and affordable, and is already being used by some coal plants. Please limit pollution in our water to save lives and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. Zero - discharge standards should go into effect as soon as possible. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 74 Commenter Name: W. Osborn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2530 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency's job is to protect our environment. The Agency needs to do better. I have some ho pes that the new broom will sweep cleaner than the old brooms that were owned by the polluters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Neuman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2533 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Requiring that coal plants employ the strongest controls possible to limit po llution of our waters may ultimately encourage energy companies to choose less costly cleaner energies (wind, solar) which would help reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and fight global warming, as well. http://www.allthingsenvironmental.wordpress.com C omment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Teeler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2536 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 75 We are poisoning the only water on our planet. What we put in the water today will affect the children of tomorrow and alter the course of our future -- the future of all life on earth. You have the power to protect its purity and determine its fate. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Fitzgerald Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Numb er: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2543 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a high impact industrial civilization, we have taken 500 million years of stored carbo n on Earth and pumped it into our atmosphere as greenhouse gases We have changed the dynamics and regulatory capacity of that protective layer of gases forever and condemned humanity and life on planet Earth to an uncertain and volatile future. It is even more galling to realize that the liquid leftovers from this highly polluting activity are being dumped into our waters. This is unacceptable and our water needs to be protected from these toxic pollutants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. Applegate Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2547 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated i nto Response: No Comment Excerpt: Reagan's "Ash heap of history" is what we are leaving to our children, and our children's children. It's time for all of us, especially governments and the wealthy, to work to leave them a better, healthier world, not an "Ash heap." Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 76 Commenter Name: S. Shaw Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2549 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Revi ew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is essential to life. We have given lip service to protecting it's purity, and allowed the surface waters of this country to degrade to pre - clean water act levels. This is outrageous. Please tighten restrictions on the biggest polluters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Sax Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2550 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Let's get this going - why does it take 30 years or more to make changes? We are getting some wonderful rains that will perk down thru rocks and make wonderful drinking water - that is if we don't pollute it...we need clean clear drinking water! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Schroeder Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2552 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: My grandchildren need clean water and air. I recycle, hang my clothes out on a line, walk, and bike in order to save the earth in my small way. We have put up solar panels and use rain barrelsEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 77 as well. These help in a small way, what you can do will make b ig changes that will be felt by all on planet earth. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Irwin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2553 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We must not allow the discharge of water polluted with toxic heavy metals and other toxins. This may be a cheaper way to remove hazardous coal ash but not the most environmentally responsible manner of doing so. Please finalize the zero - discharge water pollutions standards to eliminate toxic metals from being dumped into our waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Mckee Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2557 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporat ed into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Americans need potable drinking water! Coal ash wastewater is toxic. The present practice in effect offloads health costs onto the American public. Level the playing field! Require them all to do so. The zero - dischar ge water pollution standards should be finalized and go into force as quickly as the Administrative Procedure Act permits. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Minore Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2558 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 78 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Right now, coal ash is sitting virtually on the ba nks of the Detroit River, and a strong rain washes the residue into the water. That specific situation -- along with general safeguards - represents a critical need for better protection for our waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Lamp Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2560 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Resp onse: No Comment Excerpt: We must stay current with our efforts to preserve our environment rather than only being in compliance. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Chandler Commenter A ffiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2561 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Whithout water live would never have evolved. No live would exist. the planet will do fine without life at all. Is that what you want? Then do something, unless the EPA is utterly subservient to corporate profits. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 79 Commenter Name: C. Tarman - Major Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2562 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly believe the Environmental Protection Agency should NOT allow any toxin - dumping in ANY water/groundwater system within its jurisdiction. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed ap proach must be considered the most common - sense and affordable. It is already being used by some coal plants, why not ALL coal plants? We must ELIMINATE pollution in our water so that it is once again safe to drink and our fish are safe to eat. Comment Res ponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Peard Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2563 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Re view External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's hard to believe that these practices are still going on. Let's make the health of our planet top priority. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Mills Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2564 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Ex cerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 80 I appreciate your attention regarding the zero - discharge water pollution standards; It is important that we reduce our human footprint and work to protect our environment as much as possible. Water is essential for life; Access to clean, uncontami nated, water cannot be underestimated. Thank you for your time and consideration. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. and D. Stevens Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Contro l Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2565 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is our understanding that the EPA is reviewing wastewater safety standards. In p articular, water safety standards for coal fired power plants. If this review is not underway the EPA should start a review. I think these safety rules have not been updated since 1982. It is time for the EPA to prevent coal plants from polluting our water ways with their wastewater discharge. Our communities should be protected from the toxins in this wastewater. The technology exists to affordably reduce or eliminate these toxins. The EPA should require industries that dump wastewater into our waterways to clean that wastewater first. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Baer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2566 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I recognize that there are no perfect sutions. However, we should not go backward in our efforts to clean up our great land. Nor should some inconvenience or cost thwart positive efforts. Like the proverbial 'boy who cried wolf' industries always scream impossibility... But the come thru when needed. This is one of this times.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 81 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exc erpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Kenel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2568 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comme nt Excerpt: Our rivers and lakes can no longer be used as sewers. Companies can be held to specific pollution and cleanup guidelines as part of their business plan. We need more oversight and a reduction of waste from power plants. I urge the Environment al Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commente r Name: D. Kobylarz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2572 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's past the time when something seriously needs to be done to protect our natural resources - namely our water supply. We can get buy without a lot of things in our lives, but we cannot exist without clean water. With the amount of toxic materials being dumpe d into our waters, we will ultimately reach the point where we will not be able to recover from our stupidity. Coal plants (and other "dumpers") need to be forced to comply with measures set forth to protect us all. If they don't, we need to fine them or s hut them down without giving them loopholes to slither through. At the same time we need to take all the so - called representatives who are siding with the coal industry and other polluters, and keep them out of the process that allows them to hinder clean water and a clean environment. It's no secret that these representatives are catering to the toxic corporations who are destroying our country - whether it's for handouts or favors.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 82 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt N umber 1 Commenter Name: A. Moyer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2574 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Exc erpt: Along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters, I urge you to stop playing video games in your recreational club house and get to work! That means updating laws to protect the environment in this decade, not the year of Atari. This i s no joke! You have been busted and no one is laughing. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Wood Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2578 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Dear EPA, Many of the waters I would love to catch and eat fish from are so polluted with mercury that the fish pose a significant health risk. The mercury comes from coal fired powerplants hundreds of miles to the east. Please Please Please take this challenge seriously. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C . Peyton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2582 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 83 Comment Excerpt: It is the EPA's job to cleanup and keep clean our water, land and air. If you wouldn't drink it it doesn't belong in the water. If you wouldn't let your child consume it why are you letting someone put it anywhere near them? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Comella Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2584 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated int o Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is common - sense, affordable, and is already being used by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. It should be finalized and go into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Canep a Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2585 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: After 30 years, the techno logy has progressed sufficiently to warrant re - looking at the allowable pollution rates from the coal - fired electricity industry. It can and certainly should be upgraded. In fact it is long overdue, and the industry certainly hasn't demonstrated any inclin ation to do anything on its own without a legislative gun at its head. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 84 Commenter Name: J. Sommer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - O W - 2009 - 0819 - 2589 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is common - sense, affordable, and is already being used by some coal plants. Bravo to them! Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will ensure it's safe to drink and will lead to a healthier community. It should be finalized and go into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Gahris Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2591 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Exter nal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Safeguarding our water supply needs is of the highest priority. We need clean water to live healthy lives. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Comm enter Name: C. Conover Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2594 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 85 As a Virginian who lives half an hour's drive from the coal - lading stations at the mouth of the James, this matter is of particular concern to me; I hope that, as a dedicated and capable public servant, it will also be of particular concern to you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: N. Walworth Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2596 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Exter nal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water safety is of paramount importance to us as a species and to our continual life on this planet. The EPA has the most important job: keeping our air and water safe. This is no t something that should be a political tool. Our safety should be guarded based on the best scientific knowledge of our time and nothing else! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Salas Com menter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2599 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am a Chemical Enigineer and a registered Professional Mechanical Engineer who has designed, started up and operated power plants, and I can assure you that the 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters are absolutely justified in their pleas that the Environmental Protection Agen cy finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 86 Commenter Name: S. Stoudemir e Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2600 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: THIS IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY! PLEASE, PLEASE DO THE RIGHT THING. PLEASE BE HEROES FOR AMERICA. Please stop allowing coal - fired power plants to dump millions of pounds of pollutants into our waters every year, ..... more toxic waste than any other US industry, including the chemical, pl astic, and paint manufacturing industries. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Vinciquerra Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2602 - A1 Com ment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This is a common sense solution to a problem that is sickening individuals throughout the country. Don't accept the argument that this will increase electricity costs and therefore new regulations shouldn't be put in place. Public health trumps just about any issue I can think of when it comes to quality of life for rich, poor, and everyone in between. Changes can be made cost e ffectively, and any small cost increases will easily be made up in reduced medical costs for society as a whole. Thank you! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Holme Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2603 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 87 Comment Excerpt: It is also important to realize that added expense to electricity produced by coal only better reflects the real cost of that electricity, and better enables lower pollution and greenhouse gas - free alternative energy solutions to gain traction. These regulations embody the "long view" and are the right th ing to do. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Perlmutter Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2610 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Think of your children and grandchildren, or whoever is close to you in the next generation and do it for them, if not for the rest of us. You know it's the r ight thing to do. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: E. Stoehr Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2613 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Extern al Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please help to secure clean water by limiting the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Thank you for your time. Co mment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 88 Commenter Name: K. Keppeler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2614 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a Viet Nam veteran who fought to defend this country, I did my job. It is now time for you to do yours. You job is to protect the environment for the citizens of the Unit ed States, not to allow the coal companies to run rough shod all over the citizens of our country and the citizens of the communities that are devastated by the actions of the coal industry. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: W. Houck Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2615 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Co mment Excerpt: Please do more to protect our health and lives. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Mitchell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 2617 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have chronic neuropathy, diagnosed as most likely from selenium. Please update the regulations limiting the dischargeof such metals into our water by the coal plants, so that others may be protected from the debilitating effects of chronic neuropathy.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 89 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: V. Croasdale Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2621 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am a registered "Professional Engineer" and a "Chartered Water and Environmental Manager". I believe that most Federal EPA regulations should be tighter than at present, particullarly when various governors have instructed their state EPA or equivalent that no state rule can be more stringent than Federal law. Consequently Federal law has become the highest enforceable standard in many states. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Westler Commenter Affiliati on: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2625 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: HELP! We American people are being poisoned and dying from coal plant discharge. HELLO, EPA, are you listening? We need protection for our health and life. You're the only department that can do this. HELP US. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED YOU. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265 , Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Varellas Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2626 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 90 Comment Excerpt: There is no excuse for allowing our water to become contaminated with pollutants. Every drop of water this planet will ever have is here and must be protected and used wisely. Without water we all will die. Protect our water, now! Com ment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Hanbury Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2627 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No E xternal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: There is no more time left. As a fellow human citizen of Planet Earth, I abjure you to do and enact the correct scenario to preserve our very existence. For God's sake, I've j ust been advised not even to eat "farmed" Talapia among many other fish. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Pildner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - H Q - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2631 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Must we go over and over such an obvious thing? What is more important than protecting where we liv e FIRST? Everything else is SECONDARY. No clean water and air, no health, no future. Does indulging business interests trump the public health? NO! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Gild ersleeve Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 91 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2632 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is a basic right to have clean water. Allowing companies to go on polluting them is inexcusable and I urge you to make your decisions with all of our futures in mind. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. H unt Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2633 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Back in the early 1970s I saw human stool fly out of a pipe over the Norwalk River in Georgetown, CT. I was utterly disgusted, and this is not something I heard about from someone else, I saw it myself. We definitely need not only to keep our water safety laws in place, we need t o strengthen them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Katz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2634 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Externa l Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Frankly, I am sick and tired of the corporate interests behind these irresponsible water polluting practices jeaporadizing our health and safety as the bure aucrats go through the motions of protecting us. It seems our society takes one step forward to correct these problems and then takes two steps back as they cave in to corporate lobbying pressures.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 92 Let's take that leap of faith and phase out coal as an ene rgy source and get rid of all the cancer, global warming and degradation of our water quality merely so a handful of people can sail their yachts and maintain their luxury mansions throughout the world. This is absurd! How many times do we have to tell the bureaucracy to do the job they were hired to do. Return the bribes you were given and do your job! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Schmidt Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docu ment Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2635 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Hey guys. Let's get up to date and move forward instead of being stuck w ith old inadequate standards. Please think about how your decisions will affect your own families and then you will realize why so many citizens are watching your decisions so closely!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excer pt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Kutschenreuter Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2636 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: N o Comment Excerpt: I can't add much more to the reasons for gettting rid of the toxic metals in our waters but if anyone thinks it's all right maybe we should make sure that this is the water they and their families drink! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 93 Commenter Name: S. Morse Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2638 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I live in Alaska where I enjoy clean air and clean water. For that reason, I would like to see all of the country enjoying the same. Please do not waste your chance to make positive changes for our country!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Ripley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2639 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Revie w Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is long past time to take action to protect the water we depend on for drinking purposes, enjoyment, and marine life. The Obama administration can take a strong stand where previous administrations have floundered on this issue. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Trombly Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2641 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 94 This is a no - brainer. If you care about the Earth and the creatures of this planet then stop idiots fro m killing our most precious resource. The EPA was created to stop the criminal poisoning of our world. It is in your job description. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Harris Commenter A ffiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2642 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: 1982 was when the EPA wrote our current safeguards against coal plants dumping their toxic byproducts into our waters. Coal - fired power plants produce more toxic waste than any other industry in the United States, including the chemical, plastic, and paint manufacturing industries. They spew mi llions of pounds of pollutants into our waters every year, and they'll keep at it as long as the Reagan - era rules go unchanged. Today, we know a lot more about the toxins that coal plants dump into pits, ponds, lakes, and streams. Heavy metals and toxic sl udge don't belong in our water. Peoples' health is more important than big polluters' profits. It's time to update our water safeguards, and protect our communities against toxic coal wastewater. We need the strongest possible safeguards against this type of pollution. Keep our water clean and safe. We can't wait another 30 years to get this right! Thank you for your consideration on these matters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. Hought on Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2643 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 95 Comment Excerpt: Why is the United States frozen in time when it comes to pollution limits allowed by industry? We as a nation need to move to curb the limits of this toxic waste. Now is the time to move forward and protect our greatest national asset, our environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Dinu Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2645 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In a world where, because of mercury contamination due to coal plants, we should not eat more than one serving of fish a week, something needs to be done to curb pollution due to these power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Hunt Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2647 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is our life source, and we need to protect it. Please help! Thank you for your consideration in this important matter. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. Ferris - Olson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2648 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 96 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporat ed into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards, standards that limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our nations waterways. It is the EPA's responsibility to work diligently to eliminate dangerous wastewater. The EPA should require coal plants to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead in ways that do not create water pollution while prot ecting our air. Reducing and eventually eliminating the amount of pollution in our water saves lives and reduces illness by ensuring our drinking water is safe and our aquatic and marine resources are safe for consumption and recreational use. Please final ize and put into effect zero - discharge water pollution standards now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. Haun Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 2649 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: All living things animals depend on clean and safe water to live, please help to keep our waters clean an d safe by setting higher standard strategies to industry polluting our waters to clean up their waste products. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. King Commenter Affiliation: Private Cit izen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2657 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 97 The time is here to protect the environment over profit for the power industry. Farmers, wildlife, and the future of our drinking water depend on it. Our oceans continue to acidify for so many reasons, let us reduce it by one now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Plummer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2659 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is obvious that the past procedures we have been using has nothing but destroy, it is time to move forward with clean. We need to leave those dirty procedures behind and stop protecting the big money and start taking care of the things that need it the most. I agree with what Reagan said. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: H. Jones Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2662 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With all the chemicals that have come into use since the Clean Water Act was passed in 1972, we need MUCH more protection, updated to ref lect the new pollutants. The health of the nation depends on it. Start ASAP, please! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Sanders Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Nu mber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2663 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 98 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Surely you are aware of the widespread, almost universal heavy metal toxicity in our po pulation. Isn't it your job to help protect us (that includes your own families as well) from such pollution? Please, please do your job! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Young Commente r Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2668 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Stop the drip - drop. The drip - drop polluting of air, water, and land has become a hazard to the people, which you are supposed to be protecting and working with. I also feel we have a responsibility to protect wildlife, since they are at our mercy. Don't be a sellout. Let us begin to look f or alternatives from dirty, illness - causing coal. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Tracy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2669 - A1 Co mment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please make the visionary decision to keep our water clean and safe. Coal - fired power plants produce more toxic waste than a ny other industry in the United States, including the chemical, plastic, and paint manufacturing industries. They spew millions of pounds of pollutants into our waters every year -- and they will keep at it as long as Reagan - era EPA rules go unchanged.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 99 We need the strongest possible safeguards against toxic wastewater, and cannot wait another 30 years to get this right! Thank you for your consideration. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. DAngelo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2671 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Right now my local u tility is one of the main stake holder in a plant that causes 32 premature deaths yearly. I have no say in this matter. Stronger safeguards against toxic waste water would save lives. The fact that dumping waste water into fresh water is still allowing in 2013 is incredible considering how fast our aquifers are depleting. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. Pizer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 2672 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I want to tall you that we need to take action soon as possible this is are earth and we need to protect i t. why am i doing this? I am doing this because i want to make a diffrence so please help out!!!!!! sorry typing and writing is not good(i am 10 years old) Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 100 Commenter Name: E. Golden Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2679 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Smokestack scrubb er sludge must also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like SELENIUM, ARSENIC, MERCURY, AND LEAD -- all known carcinogens that kill!!!! Let's make pollutin g our environment illegal and harshly punish corporations whose only motives are to increase their profits BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY. These corporations are killing us, and it's the EPA that is allowing this to continue. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Sanford Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2680 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Inco rporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Poison is poison and should not be allowed to be an avoidable part of our water supply. This should be true for all industry and many by products of the present industrial farming practices that produce untold gallons of waste products that are allowed to seep into the ground or surface flow to rivers and bays causing significant problems for native species. Please take measures to increase the monitoring and control of this poisonous contamination of our ground and surface waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Richardson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2681 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 101 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The following appeal is submitted in an effort to address only one main source of pollution related to the coal energy system. The evidence should b e clear by now that for both environmental protections as well as public health reasons the use of coal production as a primary means of energy production should be subject to serious regulations that begin to curtail our dependence upon it nationally. We have been slow in recognizing the negative effects of our practices over many years and absolutely need the EPA to make the corrections that have a chance of controlling unacceptable actions by various irresponsible corporations. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Nix Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2682 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Here in West Virginia, the electricity from 25 of our 28 coal plants is exported to other states, but the pollution stays right here. Giant sludge ponds with lax or no inspection face uncertain fates. The ash also needs to be treated as toxic, whether dry or wet. One thing's for certain -- our state oversight of this immense environmental legacy is sorely lacking and we desperately look to the EPA to stand up for us! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Brendel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2683 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: N o External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 102 Comment Excerpt: Having grown up in the 1950's and 60's, I saw polluted lakes and rivers, and breathed smoggy, foul - smelling air. Years later, our nation noticed, and made some laws that be gan to clean up our environment. But now we can and must do much better for today's and tomorrow's children. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Brendel Commenter Affiliation: Private Cit izen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2683 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Having grown up in the 1950's and 60's, I saw polluted lakes an d rivers, and breathed smoggy, foul - smelling air. Years later, our nation noticed, and made some laws that began to clean up our environment. But now we can and must do much better for today's and tomorrow's children. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Lockwood Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2685 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Inc orporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a Christian we are called to be faithful stewards of this beautiful world the Lord has given us. Please do your best to protect our world. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Ex cerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Williams Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 103 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2694 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No C omment Excerpt: Water will be the most valuable resource in the 21st Century. What sort of legacy will you leave the children of this nation if you do not stop the atrocities being done to our water resources? It is time to act not negotiate. Thank you f

or your service. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Eblen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2695 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Some coal plants are now using dry systems to move hazardous coal ash. This is workable, sensible, affordable. Using dry systems is the right thing to do: dr y systems prevent dumping millions of gallons of toxic coal ash waste water every year. The time is now. Please use your position, your voice to ensure that your agency sets standards that require all coal plants to use dry waste systems. We all need clean -- not toxic -- water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Saraceno Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2696 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 104 We need to protect our water ! That includes not only our oceans which is serious, but also our rivers, lakes, and streams. Need you guys to do the right thing. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: N. Littlejohn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2701 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Extern al Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In 1982, a lot was happening in America. The Milwaukee Brewers were heading to the World Series, a hot new TV show called Knight Rider premiered, and the f irst pop album -- by the Bee Gees -- came out on compact disc. It was the year of the Commodore 64 and the year President Reagan promised that democracy would leave communism "on the ash - heap of history." 1982 was also the year the EPA wrote our current sa feguards against coal plants dumping their toxic byproducts into our waters. President Reagan was right about one thing: Some things belong in the past. Tell the EPA that it's time to update our water safeguards, and protect our communities against toxic c oal wastewater! Coal - fired power plants produce more toxic waste than any other industry in the United States, including the chemical, plastic, and paint manufacturing industries.[1] They spew millions of pounds of pollutants into our waters every year, an d they'll keep at it as long as the Reagan - era rules go unchanged. We've come a long way since 1982. We know a lot more about the toxins that coal plants dump into pits, ponds, lakes, and streams. We've also shown that grassroots voices like yours can have a huge impact when we all stand together and demand better protections for our families. Strong new protections against mercury and soot are proof that you can push the EPA to put our communities' health above big polluters' profits. Our communities can't wait another 30 years to get this right. Tell the EPA that you want real protections against Big Coal's toxic wastewater! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 105 Commenter Name: R. Luna Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2702 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Living in Michigan, I find this to be EXTREMELY important since we are surrounded by water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Luna Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2703 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. It is a known fact that every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. Why has this practice been allowed t o continue given all we know about pollution and its effect on every living organism on the planet?? It’s time to end this reckless dangerous practice. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Luna Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2704 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 106 I urge the EPA to final ize the strongest possible rule to protect our rivers, Great Lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Each year coal plants pollute Michigan's lakes and rivers with toxic chemicals. Over time, these chemicals can build up in fish. When you eat a lot of these fish, the chemicals build up in your body and cause health problems. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Derry Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Numb er: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2707 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Well, I know this is part of a message from the Sierra Club (I'm not a member.), but, it is something I agree with entirely. Think of it this way. The earth is like a giant fish bowl, and if we don't clean it the same thing will happen to us that happens to our fish when we don't clean the bowl. They die. It may look like not a problem to the executives who go home to a clean neighborhood and drink filtered water, but, anything that pollutes the earth will eventually come around and get us all. Think of living in a house where you couldn't flush the toilet or take out the garbage. You have to l ive with it and store it someplace in your house or yard. Pretty soon you will be overwhelmed with garbage and waste. The same thing, on a larger scale, is happening here. If these companies are not made to assume the real cost of their production by havin g zero waste, they will do whatever they can to get away with putting it in someone else's back yard just to increase profits. Not a good thing for the environment and not a good thing for us. Please do the right thing in spite of the pressure, and the fre e dinners, etc., that the folks try to "shmooze" you with. Thanks. Facts follow. Questions? Feel free to call me. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Sageng Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2708 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 107 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: There is a move to dump coal ash here in Missouri that will seriously pollute our extensive waterways. There is absolutely no reason to allow this! Please do the right thing for our environment and the citizens of our states, and finalize the zero - discharge standards that will limit the dumping of toxic waste into our water sources. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. Solomon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2709 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Ext ernal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's time our regulations and policies caught up with our knowledge of the dangers of toxic heavy metals. For the future of our children and grandchildr en, we need this protection of tough standards and tough enforcement for coal power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. Sorlien Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Con trol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2717 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This country desperately needs protection from the toxic waste water created by power plants. Power plants should be required to "dry handle" fly ash and bottom ash, and the waste from their fly and bottom ash ponds. They should use evaporation treatment f or the waste from FGD scrubber sludge. It is a mockery of the law and the health of the American public to remove toxicEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 108 chemicals from power plant smoke stacks, and then dump them in ponds that leach into groundwater, rivers and lakes. I live downwind of t he coal - fired power plant in Salem, Massachusetts, and can testify first - hand to the air and water pollution this plant commits. My car is covered with black droplets of oily soot many mornings, and the water around the power plant is foul. The new EPA reg ulations should require power plants to use the best technology available to reduce their pollution in all forms. They have been dumping billions of pounds of toxic chemicals into our waters. This is disgraceful and must be stopped. Please enact the strong est possible regulation to cover all power plants nationwide. Thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Baker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2720 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The American people are closing coal power plants and moving for a healthier environment. The time is NOW to finalize the zero - discharge water pollution standards on toxic metals. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: E. Wagner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2721 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In the 60's and 70's, I climbed 52 mountains in WA and OR. This gave me a great appreciation o f nature and our unpolluted wilderness. Let's keep it that way! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 109 Commenter Name: E. Wagner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2721 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In the 60's and 70's, I climbed 52 mountains in WA and OR. This gave me a great appreciation of nature and ou r unpolluted wilderness. Let's keep it that way! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Trigilio Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2723 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Won't you please protect our land for our children's futures? We really only have limited resources. What do we do when th ey're gone? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Bailey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2725 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Rev iew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 110 I can't believe that in 2013 this is still going on. Please to the responsible thing for the people, parents, children, and all living things that need water to survive. Finalize zero - discharge water pollution standard NOW. Thank you for you help in this matter. Stop this pollution now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Hicks Commenter Affiliat ion: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2732 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Use the following approaches: 1) Require coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water to eliminate dangerous ash wastewater. 2) Treat smokestack scrubber sludge to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. Limiting the amount of pollution i n our water will save lives and reduce risks to human health and the environment. Please enact strong safeguards as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Trott Commenter Af

filiation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2734 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is too valuable a resource to squa nder on toxic coal ash. With the changing environment it is becoming clear that fresh water is a very finite, precious commodity. It should not be so blatantly wasted using out - dated technologies that put millions of people and hundreds of miles of rivers and their ecologies atEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 111 great risk to their health due to the known and unknown pollutants in the toxic coal plant waste. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Kamalie Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2736 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water should be clean, safe, pollution and chemical free to the furthest extent possible. The EPA should be working toward that as a high priority. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Christoffer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Doc ument Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2737 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is se nsible, affordable. Please implement it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Tezza Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2738 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 112 Comment Excerpt: PLEASE STOP THE DUMPING OF TOXIC METALS INTO OUR WATERS. STOP THE POISONING OF OUR PLANET AND OUR BODIES. The EPA'S strongest proposed approach is sensible, affordable, and already being used by some coal plants. Please support it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Powers Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2739 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is a critical resource that we absolutely cannot afford to su lly and waste. Clean water will be a major issue for our society going forward. Don't look back when it is too late and feel regret that your children have no clean water....PLEASE, protect it as much as possible as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. J. Mortimer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2742 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ext ernal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I entreat the EPA to finalize a very strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic wastewater produced by electric power plants. Power plants really MUST be required to employ the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution released into surface waters -- including arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium. This reckless practice must be ended.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 113 Strong standards to strictly limit all power plant water pollution wi ll substantially improve the health of our country's rivers and streams -- and therefore the health of all of our citizens who drink that water and eat its fish. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Bryan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2745 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Oh, pleeze! Clean water and air are so fundamental to good health that it's a no - brainer for us to completely forbid toxic metals being dumped into our waters from power plants. PLEEZE stand up to the corporations and other greedy entities that only play for profit in the short - term. We need long - term preventative measures for our children! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Soto - Aviles Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2746 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need the strongest possible safeguards against toxic waste water. We can't wait another 30 years to get this right! Please keep our water clean and safe. Thank you for your attention to this important issue. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Pepper Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2747 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 114 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Such a plan can only benefit everybody and should be finalized and put into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Johanson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2748 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We all drink water; we all breath air. I insist you keep both clean for me, my child and for g enerations yet to come. During most of my adult life we have been promised clean power plants. Make it happen with no more excuses! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Bodi Commenter Affil iation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2751 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please read that sentence out loud to yours elf. Listen carefully: You heard "...to LIMIT the AMOUNT OF TOXIC METALS THAT CAN BE DUMPED INTO OUR WATERS from POWER PLANTS", correct? How utterly preposterous is it that ANY toxic metals would be dumped into our water ANYwhere? Surely you read and heard the same sentence I did. Do you disagree with me? Let's break this down sensibly.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 115 NO CORPORATION should be allowed to wield ANY power in regards to the pristine quality of any of our waters - and you care as much as we do that we accept responsibility for keeping this precious resource clear of anything toxic, so PLEASE, Do The Right Thing. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Snope Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control N umber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2752 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Times have changed and it's time for the EPA to use your authority to keep our planet free from the awful pollution that we have created over the years. Thanks for being courageous and strong in your efforts to do the right thing for the planet and, of course, every creature that lives here. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. Giesy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2753 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: If some plants are already using the strongest approach, it should be required for all. Those plants that are using it show that it is feasible and the others should not be endangering the health of the people around them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Schemmel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2754 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 116 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We only have one earth. We must stop the horrible pollution NOW before it's too late. Our climate, our health, and the health of our children and future generations is de pending on it. Please do the right thing. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Mcree Schultz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2756 - A1 Co mment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We are depending on you! We cannot afford to risk our water so corporations can rake in profits at the people's expense. THE Y are "the people" too and should be made to see this! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Hathaway Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2757 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standard s to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Then ENFORCE THOSE STANDARDS. Unless, of course, it cuts into anyone's corporate profits.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 117 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt N umber 1 Commenter Name: G. Rutledge Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2758 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: That's it. No polly - parrotting statistics. No insufferably long parade of facts that, I am quite sure, you know better than I will hope to know in a lifetime of studying. But I have seen the devastation and my eyes do not lie. So, besides the fa cts and figure, you also have eyes that will not lie to you. So, do the right thing in this. Everybody, in fact, the universe is waiting for you to just do the right thing. You know what the right thing is, too. That's something else I know. Comment Respon se: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Briles Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2765 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Revi ew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: PLEASE clean up the environment. I was in China recently. Their pollution is terrible, but they are working on it. The US seems to be going backwards. Are we just going to sit on our hand s and let China take over leadership in transportation, research, and THE ENVIRONMENT? The time to act is long passed. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Sutton Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 118 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2766 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The time is past due. Please act now to get up to da te. There is no credible reason not to do this. Please lead in the right direction and aim high; there is nothing stopping our creating a better world except the lack of will and fortitude. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, E xcerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: I. J. DuBois Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2770 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Every state in the union is suffering from water pollution at the hands of greedy, brain - dead men who are living in the past. The EPA needs to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards and STOP the dumping of toxic metals from p ower plants into our already - polluted waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Strawn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2771 - A1 Comme nt Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: There is a serious need for such standards. The Environmental Protection Agency projects that by next year, roughly 50 percent of coal - generated electricity in the United States will come from plants that use scrubbers or similar technologies, creating vast new sources of wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 119 Yet no federal regulations specifically govern the disposal of power plant discharges into waterwa ys or landfills. Some regulators have used laws like the Clean Water Act to combat such pollution. But those laws can prove inadequate because they do not mandate limits on the most dangerous chemicals in power plant waste, like arsenic and lead. And even when power plant emissions are regulated by the Clean Water Act, plants have often violated that law without paying fines or facing other penalties. Ninety percent of 313 coal - fired power plants that have violated the Clean Water Act since 2004 were not fi ned or otherwise sanctioned by federal or state regulators, according to a New York Times analysis of EPA records. Other plants have paid only modest fines. For instance, one plant in Pennsylvania has violated the Clean Water Act 33 times since 2006; for t hose violations, the company was fined less than $26,000. Clearly, under the present rules, EPA is failing to protect the American people. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Boyd Commente r Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2772 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: THE COAL FIRED POWER PLANT IN OUR AREA HAS BEEN ABLE TO INSTALL SCRUBBERS AND SUCH TO CLEAN UP AFTER IT'S FIRES, AND I SEE NO REASON THE OTHER PLANTS SHOULD HAVE TO DO THIS ALSO. STOP POISONING OUR WORLD AND THE LIFE ON IT. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, E xcerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Caine Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2775 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Com ment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 120 Unfortunately, many communities choose coal produced power because someone has convinced them that it is cheaper than other resources and that somehow coal is clean! There is so such thing as clean coal. In a world that water shortages are rampant and drought is widespread, why waste water by using ineffective systems in our power plants? In a world where we are discovering more and more people's bodies contaminated with heavy metals such as lead and mercury, why are we permitting coal plant s to pump these dangerous contaminants into our air? More and more research is linking these contaminatns, especially mercury, to disorders such as autism. Our envirnoments should be kept safe! Please update and enforce these standards and safeguards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. White Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2779 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please move forward with protecting our water for human and wildlife aswell as the environment. Water is a limited and precious resource and it's inexcusable to allow it to b e polluted by the coal plants with coal ash. The EPA's strongest proposal is the way to go. Thank you for making the smart decision for humans, animals, fish, and the enviroment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numb er 1 Commenter Name: I. Funk Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2782 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt :Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 121 Uncontaminated water is quickly becoming a scarce commodity worldwide, and the amount of water on this earth is FINITE. We must attend to this issue as our life on this planet depends on it. Please require these standards across the board. Comment Res ponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Sauvageau Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2785 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Externa l Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is our most important resource...more essential to life than all the coal and oil in the world. It is time to get on with protecting this life sustaining element of our very e xistence. Regulations for coal should upgrade to the 21st century so that we can continue to thrive on this earth. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Efraimson Commenter Affiliation: Pri vate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2789 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It will also save the water that the world needs for hu man and animal uses. I join withal 2.1 million Sierra Club members and their supporters in my request for this action, which, I hope you'll agree, should be finalized and made to be put into action as soon as possible. Thank you for your time and considera tion. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 122 Commenter Name: B. Yozwiak Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2790 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I understand that your organization is under fire from groups that want less regulation. Please do not fold in front of this fire; do not buckle in the face of industries wants - protect the people of this country for now and for the future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: E. Jakab Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2791 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our lives, our quality of life, our environment, our food chain are all endangered by toxic metals being dumped into our waters from power plants. Please prevent this - this is what we elected a government to do! Thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Wishner Commenter A ffiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2796 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a design professional, we are requir ed to keep up with the times. Code changes regularly affect how we design as it relates to the health, safety, and welfare of our homes, our neighborhoods, and the communities we live in and love. It is high time our corporate neighborsEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 123 are regulated, and enforced, in a similar fashion. We spend so much time, money, and effort educating our children so that we may learn more about the world we live in and how it affects us all, as citizens, as humans. Please help put this knowledge to good use and move our civilization forward towards a better world for all the generations to come. We owe this to our children, not our corporations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Mcdonald Commenter Affil iation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2797 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's crazy that this isn't already in place . Seems like a no - brainer doesn't it? Poison our environment, make people and animals sick or do things different... Hmm shouldn't be a hard decision. It can't always be about money, there won't be enough healthy people left or a healthy planet to live on if we don't change our ways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Maher Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2799 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Moving into the greatest ecological challenge modern humans have ever faced, global warming, America seems to be in denial. Without steadfast res ources and access to clean water and air, etc., entire states hurt by global warming, multi state - wide extreme storms, and flooding, could perish, potentially. Do not be like the collapsed - building structural inspector, who blew his own brains out after hu ndreds died. Use your independent agency, designed to function above politics by the American Constitution, to protect Americans and their finite resources.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 124 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Lorenz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2800 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is our num ber one resource!!!! Protect it at all costs.......... Coal - fired power plants produce more toxic waste than any other industry in the United States, including the chemical, plastic, and paint manufacturing industries.[1] They spew millions of pounds of pollutants into our waters every year, and they'll keep at it as long as the Reagan - era rules go unchanged. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Smoyer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citiz en Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2801 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The costs to the American public, and to the deficit are higher if the zero - discharge water pollution standards are not finalized. "Some coal plants" are already using the dry systems to move coal ash and smokestack scrubber sludge treatment using zero - discharge systems so there is no reason all coal plants can't make these changes. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Schneider Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2802 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 125 Extern al Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: These measures have costs, but the human beings they protect are priceless. We've already seen studies that link autism in children with pollution, especia lly heavy metals. Even with these measures, we still will pay for a long time in consequences for the pollutants already in our waters. These measures are a necessary minimal requirement to limit these pollution byproducts for the future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Herring Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2803 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The power - plant owners may cry, "We can't afford to do this!" ...But that's not true. They would have to take a cut in profits, yes, but (in general) they would not be bankrupted by impleme nting these safeguards. The more important cost, after all, is maintenance of the quality of life of humans and our fellow organisms in the wild. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Zeller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2805 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It saddens me that the U.S. can be so noncommittal and even ignore the detriment that pollution of our waterways. The EPA can take measures to assure safe water. Take action to bring our upgrade our waterways to safe standards when you know an approach to take. Please move forward o n this.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 126 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: E. Schafer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2806 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please continue the strong leadership you have been showing on behalf of us all - we're all interconnected and depend on you to ensure our safe drinking water and c lean air. Please do what we so desperately need you to do! Many thanks from the four voting members of our family, Asha, Ravi, Elsa and Shashi Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Pfeiffer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2807 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: After hearing this week of a preliminary study on the connection between Autism and toxic pollutants, this, along with the many auto immune disorder and cancer studies, show how imperative it is that we put in place the strongest possible safeguards against toxic wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. Moore Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2810 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 127 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I remember in Ramsey NJ in 1972 how the creek was killed when construction workers dumped fuel and paint from a construction site. We were kids we Waded in that creek loo king for frogs and crayfish and turtles. After the dumping their was nothing living. As I grew up the EPA came into existance the clean water act . The agreements on CFCs that stopped the depletion of the ozone. It is time to update the regulations . In 20 years our knowledge about what is harmful has improved. Also you need to up date the standards and tighten them as they pertain to radionuclide concentration due to seepage from Hanford. And other leaking sites . Do the right thing update and tighten the standards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. Moore Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2811 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Revie w Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We will not accept excuses or complaints that such regulations ill hurt the companies, or adversely affect the national economy, and cost jobs, blah blah. They ref use because they feel no responsibility to be good corporate citizens. THIS IS COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Shelton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2812 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 128 This should not be a partisan issue, but it seems that republicans w ant to go back to the '50's, and don't care about their environment. I hope that you disagree with their position and will proceed to do whatever is necessary to preserve what clean water supplies we have left. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Barcus Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2813 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Now is the time to make the health of our water on this planet a priority! It's a choice between fossil fuels and a more sustainable green planet; between ultimate death and continuous life. Simple as that. Comment Res ponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Matejcek Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2814 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Despite the fur - low cuts, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to immediately stop toxic metal dumping into our waters across our Nation from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. Slone Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2815 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 129 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Why are we still going through this in the 21st century? Put a stop to the polluting of our fresh water. When is this going to en d? We know better, and people are getting really tired of paying the price for rich people and their corporations who don't give a damn! We have to remove all lead paint according to EPA regulations in a home for a reason. But it's somehow alright to dump it in the water we NEED TO LIVE!!! Along with the other toxic chemicals and metals that will kill the brains and bodies of our babies. Step in to the present, do what you know is right. Be brave, and stand up to the selfish,greedy people who are slowly kil ling us. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Romo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2817 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review F lag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Simple, logical and effective. Why is that so hard to make happen? Why didn't it happen in the beginning? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: Clean Water Action Mass Email Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2821 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ex ternal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 130 Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It’s time to end this reckless practice. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the h ealth of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: H. Seizer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number : EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2823 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: If we don't make the effort now, what will our grandchildren have to wash with an drink? Ca n't we take care of our enviornment now? Have we not ruined enough in the name of so - called jobs and profits? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Whitis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2824 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We're past the 'choice' point - it's now a necessity to prot ect the health of our citizens, not to mention what's left of our natural resources. Water is no longer assuredly cheap or plentiful, and the hazards to our waterways and water supply keep mounting. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 131 Commenter Name: C. M. (no surname provided) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2825 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorp orated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This is only the sensible approach to our safety, our children's futures and for the fragile planet we live on, our home. There is only a very small fraction of potable water on this planet, please work keep it s o. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: H. Davison Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2827 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag : No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I was disappointed to recently learn that our efforts to clean this country's waters had not been nearly as successful as hoped or expected. Our nation's rivers, lifeblo od to so many communities including mine, are continually used as dumps endangering their health including the aquatic and plant life supported by these waters and, possibly, residents who live nearby. Cleaning these waters for consumption is very costly t o local governments. Water system infrastructure is not cheap and many communities find it very difficult to maintain their systems in a proper manner. There are numerous examples all around the country of cities forced to repair their systems and the cost of those repairs land directly in the ratepayers' laps. But, we continue to allow industry to pollute then expect residents to pay for the cleaning up, which is very unfair. It's time for industry to do its part and not expect the American people to pay f or cleaning up the mess they create! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 132 Commenter Name: A. Wolf Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2828 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is incredible that this nation continues to allow its water to be contaminated with toxins. Water sustains all life on earth and without water we all die. Yet, we consciously allow corporations who have no soul or humanity to poison this precious resource. The planet is warming. Droughts are becoming more frequent. Water is becoming a precious and limited resource. Let's not decreas e our water supply more through pollution. We do not need more danger signs that say - Danger Do not Drink or Fish Polluted Water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: W. Grossman Commenter Af

filiation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2831 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: To the Man on the Street, this all makes perfect sense, so why is it taking so long to enact lifesaving technology? The Earth gave us a wonderful planet to inhabit millions of years ago but it's only taken us a hundred to poison it for ourselves who will soon become the most endangered species i f we don't do something about overpopulation and out - of - control pollution sooner, rather than later. Then what? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Lowe Commenter Affiliation: Private Cit izen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2832 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 133 Comment Excerpt: Our nation's potable water supplies are stretched as it is, and some accounts have stated that these water supplies are already not as pure as we would like. So, why allow bad discharge practices to occur? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Hawley Co mmenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2833 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection A gency has the responsibility to protect our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. Catala Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2837 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA proposal would finally ensure that our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. Please ensure that it is p ut into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Mabry Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2838 - A1 Comment Excerpt N umber: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 134 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We are now into the 21st century and as a former federal park ranger, I believe in making management decisions based on sound science and c ommon sense. It is time to update our Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) regulations and to no longer grant waivers from EPA regulations to the oil, gas, coal and mining industries. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. James Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2839 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With millions of people in the developing world drinking unsafe water, it is appalling that here in the United States, a nation considered "developed", we are still having to petition our government to protect our own water supplies! I am grateful for your service to us all, and I hope and pray that you will take the lead in these actions that safeguard our precious water supplies. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. Crouse Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2841 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As an emeritus member of th e American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS), I urge EPA to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit amount of metallic poisons dumped into our waters from power plants.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 135 Reference: "Summary for Decision - Makers", /Millennium Ecosyste m Assessment Systems/ (Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005). Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Silva Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 2842 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's summer. We think of swimming and fishing with our families and friends in our lakes and rivers - like we di d as children, like we hope to do with our grandchildren. But........we need your help to keep our waters clean. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Lambeth Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2843 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA has an important role to fulfill. Since some in con gress have chosen to obstruct environmental protections and represent corporations rather than protect citizens; it is imperative upon the EPA to act in our interests. Our environment is rapidly deteriorating and our health impaired by continued dumping of wastes by corporations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 136 Commenter Name: P. Sweeny Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2844 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Stop allowing corporations to dump their toxic wastes and waste water into our rivers and streams. Protect the American public and taxpayers from th e dangers and expense of this pollution. Require companies to process, clean and safely dispose of their toxic waste. Stop dumping on the public. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: W. Jacobs Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2845 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Renewables become more econ omically viable when externalities of coal are not, literally, dumped on the public's resources. Force the real costs of fossil fuel to be paid by those that use them. Begin boilerplate Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excer pt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Deland Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2847 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 137 Comment Excerpt: No exceptions, no loop holes. Has to be done for all of our futures. The EPA is one of the few departments that many times works for 'we, the people'. Act more urgently, faster, louder. You have a luxury that not many have, 'we, the peop le' believe in you. Without our do nothing Congress, you can drive incredible change. Forget the GOP and their complaints, we're with you protecting us, our children, and restoring our ecosystems. please TAKE MORE ACTION, including requiring zero discharge water pollution from power plants. If this doesn't go through, we'll know that you were paid off by power companies. Most of country is bought, please stay above the money. Take a proactive precautionary role. Comment Response: See the preamble to the f

inal rule and response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Rios Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2851 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External R eview External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: EPA, there should be no compromises when it comes to the environment. Do you want your children and grandchildren inheriting a dirty toxic world? Fast Forward 2030: Grandchild to Grand pa, why can't we go swimming in the lake that you and daddy use to fish and swim in? Grandpa: because we failed to take action when we had the chance. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. C andell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2853 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 138 Until we wean ourselv es from coal fired plants we need to do the best we can to leave a healthy planet for our children, heavy metals in the water is not the way to do it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. M cdonough Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2861 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Pollution of water, air, or land is hazardous to humans, animals, and is a component of climate change. In the news this week, medical studies linked autism to toxins in the environment. Deregulation is an unmitigated threat to our health and the health of our environment. R egulations need to meet the realities of our circumstances in the 21st century and should be updated accordingly. Please protect our right to clean water - it is the only ethical, responsible position on this issue. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Barron Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2863 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorp orated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: You are allowing the poisoning of America! This has to stop. Cancer is spreading everywhere at a faster rate than ever. Minimal actions are taken by the govt to protect people from the toxins spewed by heedless c orporations into our environment. Support peoples health instead of the corporate bottom line. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 139 Commenter Name: J. Copeland Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2864 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Enough of this lack of concern for the next seven generations. I stand as a witness to the rise of the masses finding their voice to claim the healing of the Earth Mother. It starts with one person. I add my voice to the call of positive action. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Sanders Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2867 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Why is there any discussion about this? - this is a no - brainer: finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. Trown Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2868 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into R esponse: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 140 We have learned a lot since the EPA issued their first safeguards trying to limit the damage done to our environment by coal plants. I applaud the EPA for putting that knowledge to use in your latest proposals to deal with th e problem of wet ash. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Sevilla Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2870 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 E xternal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean waters are essential to a healthy population and our future depends on the EPA's enforcement of laws and tightening laws against water pollution . We cannot afford to have industry pollute our waters -- it is a crime against humanity and the environment we live in. Polluting should be punishable by closures of industry that do not adhere to environmental protection and pollution cannot be tolerated o r else we the citizens pay the ultimate price and that is unconstitutional! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Candell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2871 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Until we wean ourselves from coal fired plants we need to do the best we can to leave a health y planet for our children, heavy metals in the water is not the way to do it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 141 Commenter Name: V. Jones Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2873 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a person currently suffering from heavy metal toxicity - I know full well the costs both fin ancial and health wise of encounters with this type of pollution. It is a very important issue for me - please protect others from the problems I have encountered. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: E. Russ Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2874 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I do not wan t to find that my water contains harmful chemicals that could hurt my family. We must take action to protect our waters and keep them clean. Please take a step toward protecting the earth for generations to come! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Wheeler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2875 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpor ated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need clean water.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 142 Heavy metals are known to cause cancer. All the research & walks for cancer etc mean little if we do not clean up our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Ripley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2879 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No C omment Excerpt: Nothing has been done on this issue since 1982. Yes, 1982! Unbelievable. You have the opportunity to make a positive and major difference in the lives and environment of all Americans. Thank you for your time and consideration. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Kaufmann Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2881 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Exter nal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water and air are our most precious irreplaceable resources, and protecting both should be our highest priority, well above energy production. And if we must keep burning co al, let's make sure it is done in a way that keeps our air and water clean. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. and B. Olson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Numbe r: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2882 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 143 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: One of the biggest play on words is when the coal industry came out with the slogan "clean coal" there is no such thing as "clean coal". It is really sad to know that some people think there is such a thing as "clean coal" Please clean up this dirty industry. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 C ommenter Name: E. A. Caldwell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2885 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I want cleaner water for my family. I live near the 4 corners area of New Mexico. Coal - fired power plants produce more toxic waste than any other industry in the United States, including the chemical, plastic, and paint manufacturing industries. 1 They s pew millions of pounds of pollutants into our waters every year, and they'll keep at it as long as the Reagan - era rules go unchanged. 1 Duhigg, Charles, Cleansing the Air at the Expense of Waterways, New York Times, October 12, 2009 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. Ratkowski Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2886 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 144 I know of your Baltimore background in water and that you understand the science in this area. All I can do is ask you to let the data guide you and finalize the power plant zero - discharge water pollution standards. Heavy metal toxicity is a real threat to both riparian and lacustrine flora and fauna. Not to mention the people downstream. Please have EPA require dry systems for coal ash transport and scrubber sludge. The technology's been ar ound for a long time and the requirement of its use is not - despite what industry reps will say (what they always say) - a surprise and will not destroy the industry. Please move to finalize the rule. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Eason Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2889 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This State Texas mostly depends on coal for power and many plants are old and emit a great deal of Mercury. Mercury contaminates essentially all bodies of water in the whole State. We need to clean up our dirty coal powered plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Wamby Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2891 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review F lag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would like to add that after thirty years of profits and executive enrichment it is time to force the coal companies to spend their money to protect the public heal th. We cannot afford any more pollution to our air and water.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 145 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Thomas Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2893 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stop the coal industry from polluting our natural resources - water and ash / carbon don't mix. It is crucial - at this time especially - to protect our vital resources that sustain us in every day life. Water right up there with Air - so, Please - let's not go back to the dark - ages. This is our future. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will sa ve lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. It should be finalized and put into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Falcon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2894 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Since you'll get 2.1 million copies if the boilerplate letter, I won't repeat it: I'll only point out that since we now -- 30 years after the current regulations were set -- have the science to know what's happening, how bad it is, and how to stop it, ther e's no valid reason not to. Please, let your agency live up to its name. Environmental Protection was never more important. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 146 Commenter Name: D. Addison Commenter Affiliatio n: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2898 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The myths that North American has limitless water and a "small" amount of water pollutants is acceptable must be permanently be laid to rest. When coal plants discard coal ash, the process can only be sensibly done with the dry system format. Whenever water is used, millions of gallons of water are polluted annually. Between this latter process and hydraulic fracturing, well over one billion gallons of water become polluted every single year. We cannot leave it future generations to only dream of days when clean water abounded in our nation. Thank yo u for the opportunity to comment on this very important matter. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Hoekstra Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 2899 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: which have been polluting our environment for years. Not only will this serve to protect our waterways and our environment in big ways, but it will help to restore the purity of the food chain of which we are an essential part and play a crucial role. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. Craig Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2901 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 147 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The cost - benefit analysis that these corporations do to justify polluting our environment is all one - sided. They get the benefit, but the cost is borne by the public, including future generations. Please protect us and our children. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Guerin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2903 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated in to Response: No Comment Excerpt: MORE THAN TWO MILLION OF US SAY: TIME TO QUIT TOXIC POLLUTION OF WATERS IN THE USA! (And throughout the whole world, for that matter!) Time for ZERO - DISCHARGE water pollution standards, from any source, including power pl ants, coal mines, oil and gas wells and exploration, fracking, paper mills... EPA can and should act now to put a STOP to the short - sighted practice of discharging toxic waste including metals and chemicals into our waters. How irresponsible and stupid can we be, to allow this to continue? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Clark Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2906 - A1 Comment Excerpt N umber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 148 Comment Excerpt: Arsenic mercury & lead, YUM! The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is sensible, affordable, and already being used by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. It should be finalized and put into force as soon as possible. Comm ent Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Monnard Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2909 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Ex ternal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Why would we let our water be polluted and then have the water cleaning plants painfully and expensively remove all the toxins again? That could be prevented easily by a strict law against such abuse and should then be enforced and high fines handed to those who break the law. This would show how serious it is to pollute water; we can't afford being lenient about this matter! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: H. Sierra Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2911 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Re sponse: No Comment Excerpt: I live near the Rock River in rural Illinois. I've traveled along the Mississippi River, and other rivers and lakes. I formerly lived in Chicago, IL. Not one of this rivers or lakes has water that looks safe enough to drink, a nd you couldn't pay me to eat a fish from those waters. Even so, it's possible to turn the pollution around, by requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash via dry systems, not by dumping it in our nation's waterways. It's time to save our nations riv ers, lakes and streams!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 149 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: E. Cronise Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2914 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We, as human beings, can and should clean up the pollution we allow through EPA. Humans will always pollute behind backs, so these laws need to be s et in place to promote and encourage the right thing to do. We need the laws power to keep pollution under control. Please do your part and set the stage to clean up our water and air. I thank you for your attention to this vital matter. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Notkin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2917 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: You have the opportunity to do the right thing here. Please take care of yourself and your own future by doing so. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Nu mber 1 Commenter Name: M. Gardella Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2919 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 150 Comment E xcerpt: We all have tough rules and laws to live by, and so should the power plants. And they know it. They just don't want to because it will cost them more money. Well, so what. We're talking about life. If they don't care about that, then then they sh ould be made to care. No one is exempt from taking care of our earth. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Goheen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2922 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As long as the US makes use of its vast coal resources, we need stringent protection from the devastating environmental impacts of coal, which at present cause so much harm. Our country deserves the best environmental laws so our citizens can live in health and safety. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Mikkelsen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2924 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excer pt: It is far past the time when such standards should have been enforced. it will also help to keep our oceans from becoming even more contaminated by toxic materials such as mercury. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exce rpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 151 Commenter Name: W. Schoene Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2925 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comm ent Excerpt: Allowing conventional fossil - fueled powerplants to discharge waste that is not treated by the best available technology into our waterways is not only damaging to public health and the environment, but prevents the claimed cost of producing such power from accurately reflecting its true costs. This results in continued foot - dragging by utilites in transitioning to cleaner energy sources that must be our energy future, in order to avoid the most catastrophic consequences of global climate chan ge. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Okano Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2926 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please save our water from toxic pollutants, and help save our planet. Once our natural resources are gone our future and the future of our children and grandchildren are also gone. Thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Monnard Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2928 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 152 Why would we let our water be polluted and then have the water cleaning plants painfully and expensively remove all the toxins again? That could be p revented easily by a strict law against such abuse and should then be enforced and high fines handed to those who break the law. This would show how serious it is to pollute water ; we can't afford being lenient about this matter! Comment Response: See re sponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: Judith J Kraft Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2933 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support the proposed option that requires the following for power plants: 1) "dry handle" waste from fly and bottom ash ponds AND 2) use evaporation treatments for FGD scrubber sludge wast e. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: Judith J Kraft Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2933 Comment Ex cerpt Number: 3 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Thank you for proposing such strong standards on behalf of all citizens and all our surface water resources. Don't listen to the COA L lobbyists who will try to persuade you to make things easy on them (but tragically hard on our nation's water resources). Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 153 Commenter Name: K. Viglietta Commenter Affiliat ion: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2937 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to require power plants to stop dumping billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters and to use the best available technology to reduce water pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: N. Tatlock Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2938 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from both fly and bott om ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. This concerns me because I live near an ash pit in Apollo Beach Florida. Existing technology can easily solve this problem and should be employed. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Mitchell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2939 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Revi ew Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 154 Comment Excerpt: I am an attorney in Spokane, Washington. I am extremely concerned about the current state of our planet with regard to pollution. Too many streams, lakes and rivers have been poisoned by power plant wate r pollution. This is making people sick and they are dying. The EPA should protect local communities from this pollution by adopting the strongest possible safeguards. It's time to stop protecting big businesses and start acting to protect the public. Comm ent Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Steinhart Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2941 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Pollution from power plants has poisoned the land, air, and water. You are addressing air pollution, but what is happening to water is just as bad. Please finalize and im plement the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Lechner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Co ntrol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2942 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA should finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollut ion in order to protect our waterways. What kind of barbaric system would knowingly befoul its rivers and simply accept it as necessary? Technology to prevent this venal behavior by a utility on which everyone depends exists and it should be used to keep t he public safe.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 155 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Lucas Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2947 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Too many streams, lakes and rivers have been poisoned by power plant water pollution. The EPA should protect local communities from this pollution by adopting the strongest possible safeguards. If nothing meaningful is done our watersheds will become to contaminated to use and drinking water will be scarce and expensive. Water ,soil and air are the things we need to survive. If we don't take care of these natur al resources today they will be gone. We have the technology and yes it will cost more to run clean ,but the alternative is deadly. The Earth must be treated with respect. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. James Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2949 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: De ar Environmental Protection Agency, Please protect rivers and streams from toxic wastes from power plants. Thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. James Commenter Affiliation: Priv ate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2949 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 156 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Dear Environmental Protection Agency, Please protect riv ers and streams from toxic wastes from power plants. Thank you Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: Y. Odell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2952 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our local river, the French Broad, is suffering from Duke Energy's plant's leakage of coal ash toxins. Duke Energy is bigger than me, louder than me, but I don't believe that the financial well being of any person of a corporation is any more important than the health, physical well - being and lives of real, live human people. These real, live human people need the help of a voice louder than our individual voices. We need the help of the EPA. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Hathaway Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docume nt Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2954 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I believe that the power generation industry needs to be accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams. President Obama obviously believes otherwise. How about the Environmental PROTECTION Agency?Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 157 By far the best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and conv ert to safer coal ash handling systems that would eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. So what completely inadequate measures do you plan to take instead? The EPA should, but almost certainly will decline to, protect local co mmunities from this pollution by adopting the strongest possible safeguards AND THEN ENFORCING THEM. I am not, of course, holding my breath. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Tache Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2955 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Certainly the power generation industry needs to be accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams! It is a giant industry with tremendous power to pollute --- and also to preserve and protect the most important of our nation's resourc es, our precious water supply!! Please guard and protect our waters!! It is the lifeblood of our nation and of our citizens' health --- which is all too often thrown away at the behest of corporate bottom lines. The corporate powers have shown themselves to be unable or unwilling to protect our waters. Our federal agencies must PLEASE hold them accountable!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Pendleton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2959 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 158 Comment Excerpt: Too many streams, lakes and rivers have been poisoned by power plan t water pollution. The EPA should protect local communities from this pollution by adopting the strongest possible safeguards. These natural resources belong to our offspring yet to come. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exc erpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Heeman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2960 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comm ent Excerpt: Isn't it about time that the EPA got some teeth in this act and started going after polluters like the power plants? Almost 20 years since the Clean Water Act was passed, and still many of our waters are heavily polluted. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Joy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2963 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ext ernal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our fresh water sources are in decline; evaporation, industrial farming, fracking, air conditioning...I could go on and on. We cannot risk poisoning more and more water. Trying to clean up is m ore expensive than just doing things right in the first place. Even though many Americans don't understand what's going on here, you do. Be a leader. Demand strong standards against pollution and explain "why"to the American people. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 159 Commenter Name: P. Crawford Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2964 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Exte rnal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. I believe that the power generation industry needs to be accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams. Our lakes are no longer safe to swim in. The water we drink turns our eyes red in a shower and our stomachs when we drink it. The more chemicals they use to purify the our water the nastier it tastes. And unless y ou protect our water, it will get worse. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Tullis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2966 - A1 Comment Ex cerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Too many streams, lakes and rivers have been poisoned by power plant water pollution - the companies make huge profits, and we citizens end up paying the costs in terms of our health and our pocketbooks. That is not right! The EPA should protect local communities from this pollution by adopting the strongest possible safeguards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Walker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2969 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into R esponse: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 160 Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It’s ti me to end this reckless practice. New Effluent Limitation Guidelines need to set a standard for zero discharge of toxic heavy metals to the waters that communities nationwide depend on for drinking, fishing and recreation. Water pollution from coal - fired p ower plants is a huge problem in the Southeast, where over 450 coal ash dumps scattered throughout the region contain 118 billion gallons of the toxic waste. That’s enough to cover 275,000 football fields one foot deep. Today’s power plant water pollution standards are woefully out of date, and 4 out of 5 plants lack any limits on the toxic metals they are allowed to emit. There are several known cases where this wastewater is discharged directly into drinking water reservoirs such as Mountain Island Lake i n Charlotte, NC. Comment Response: See EPA’s discussion of the environmental impacts of coal ash discharges in the Environmental Assessment, summarized in the preamble to the final rule, and see response to DCN EPA - HQ OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Bruce Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2977 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge the EPA to lay down strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. EXISTING TECHNOLOGY THAT CAN EASILY ELIMINATE THIS PROCESS SHOULD BE EMPLOYED! Comment Response: See preamble to the final rule and response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 161 Commenter Name: W. Holcomb and family Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2978 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review I ncorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Limiting all power plant water pollution will greatly improve the health of our waterways, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. ***healthy workers AND customers IN a healthy environment = a h ealthy economy*** Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. Burazer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2979 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Exter nal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant w astewater. I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. Power plants should be required to use the best available tec hnology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. Existing technology can easily solve this problem and should be employed. Limiting all power plant water pollution will greatly improve the health of our waterways, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. I and my family live in Gaston County, nc which borders the Catawba River, one of the most polluted in my state. There are two coal ash ponds within 10 miles of my home. One lined and one not . There is scientific proof that the unlined pond at the closed Riverbend Steam Station owned by Duke Energy is leeching toxins into the surrounding waterways.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 162 These must be monitored and clened - up b y an independent agency, not the site's operator. Please support stronger clean water regulations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Joy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2980 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: What is it about CLEAN WATER that people don't get. We can go for days witho ut food but only 3 ish days without water. This is too dangerous to PLAY AROUND WITH for some CEO's profit margin. Limiting all power plant water pollution will greatly improve the health of our waterways, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safe r. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Belachew Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2981 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Fla g: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge you to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Please support the proposed option that would require power plants to dry handle waste from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 163 C ommenter Name: M. Monroe Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2982 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Th e greatest responsibility of the EPA is to issue strong standards that will have the most significant protective effect on our environment. Today, rivers, lakes and streams desperately need protection from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: S ee response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Brady Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2983 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Exte rnal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Limiting all power plant water pollution will greatly improve the health of our waterways, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. In plain English....do your job! Too many at the " Public Trough" just draw their pay and do nothing that their department is supposed to do to protect our water, mountains, instead you just let corporations run amok polluting our planet! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exc erpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Southerland Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2984 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 164 It is time for EPA to issue stronger standards for discharges from coal ash holding ponds to result in greatest protection our rivers, lakes aquifers, wells, and streams from toxic components of power plant waste. Responsible limits on all power plants must be implemented to protect our waters, fish and the health of our citizens. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Howard Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2987 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: When you have allowed the money grubbing polluters to contaminate the earth to the point where it can't sustain us - what will you do then? Are you so stupid to think that it won't occur in our lifetimes? Do something now ! ! ! ! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L . Milatovich Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2988 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I believe that the power generation industry needs to be accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams. If we were polluting our rivers and streams like they are, we would be made to clean them up! I don't see how they can get off by not doing so! If you make the mess, you need to be accountable and clean it up!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 165 Commenter Name: R. Mayer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2989 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please finalize the strongest standards for power plant pollution so that the best available technology must be used to keep the public safe. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Baumeister Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2991 - A 1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: If you, the EPA, don't take steps to propose and enforce standards for power plants, you will leave a terrible legacy fo r the next generation. Power companies have no motivation to clean up, to stop dumping toxic waste into waterways. Their goal is short - term profit, not a thriving eco system. We need strong standards that stop power plant companies from polluting our water ways. We need power plant companies using zero liquid discharge technology. They have to convert to safer coal ash handling systems. And the EPA needs to be the one to drive this effort forward, to not succumb to industry pressure. Industry will always say "it's too hard, it's too expensive". They will never say "great idea...we can see how the investment in these more advanced technologies will protect the environment on which we all depend". So please step up to the plate and propose the strongest standar ds possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. Sweeny Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2993 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 166 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Re view Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Stop allowing power plants to shift their clean up responsibilities on the general public and taxpayers who ultimately have to pay to clean up after them. We mu st protect our precious water resources and stop old practices of allowing free dumping in our waters, on our lands and in our air. Clean up costs must be borne by the industries that create the pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. Casey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2995 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: ****************************POWER plants and water don't mix! Hello, there is a drought going on all over the southwest, so WHY would you NOT want to use all of the POWER behind you that the Clean Water Act gives you? CONSER VATIOn is not a duirty word, bur power plant water is! ****************WHAT will people be drinking in the future? That future has turned into RIGHT NOW! Maybe you should go to BASA amnd takle a look at what a plabet looks like without water. Yes..GO to pi ctures of MARS and then tell me HOW you will get out of that mess! Oh wait, you won't be around and none of us will be ) because the life on this planet is composed very much of WATER!********************************If you don't want to look at pictures of MARS, then go to ariel views of the COLORADO River.....OMG, it used ti run all the way to the Pacific! Now it ends in MUD, which is exactly where we will all be IF you don't protect this most important resource, which is water, and CLEAN water at that!*** ****************************** Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Barkan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2997 - A1 Comment Excerpt Numb er: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 167 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I thought dumping or storing toxic waste anywhere near potable water had been banned in this country after the debacle at NY's Love Canal or t he pictures of Lake Erie catching fire. Today clean water is still being polluted. This is water! This is life! This is apparently permissible under current law and regulation! I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pol lution to protect our waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: Anonymous Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2998 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please pass guidelines that would require power plants to reduce the pollution in their waste water. Comment Response: See response to DC N EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Galardo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3000 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Inc orporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Limiting all power plant water pollution will greatly improve the health of our waterways, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 168 Please consider the lives of the people who live in these areas and put yourselves in their shoes. It could be your family. Do unto others..... Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Osberg Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3001 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This is an extremely important issue and we can and must take action. P.S. I'm a big fan of E PA and sorry you're efforts are made so difficult by the politics. Keep up the good work! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Cherry Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Contro l Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3002 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's time to protect our nation's water resources and so I am writing you to urge y ou to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 169 Commenter Name: K. Arellanes Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3003 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to demand EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. You know of all the pollutions and diseases have been caused in the Appalachians. You know of the towns flooded by the coal flooding. This must be stopped NOW! Comment Response: S ee response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Miller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3004 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ext ernal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See respo nse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Blackwood Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3006 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 170 It is well past time for the nation's power plant pollution regulations to be significantly upgraded. These plants need to implement the available technology to reduce pollution and improve the qual ity of our water. I encourage the EPA to strengthen the rules needed to protect our waterways - lakes, rivers, and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It is time to end the dumping of billions of pounds of toxic chemicals into our water supplies. Co mment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: E. V. DArnal Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3007 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: N o External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Even computers need up - dating. So should our EPA standards especially in light of current knowledge. let's apply our awareness through action! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Manzione Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3010 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Exte rnal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Currently, Clean Water Act st andards for power plants are so weak that more than 80 percent of the permits for these facilities have no limits on the amount of toxic heavy metals that can be discharged into our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Ex cerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 171 Commenter Name: A. Zuppo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3011 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am in favor of the EPA using the strongest approach in protecting our waters from toxic coal waste. In addition to the general health concerns associated with such waste, I am also concerned as a recreational fisherman about the toxic levels of chemicals found in our fish. It is alarming that so many of our fish are not safe to eat. What are we doing to improve the quality of our water so that it is even safe for humans? We need to do whatever is necessary to clean up our streams and ri vers now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Stambaugh Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3012 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Re view Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is extremely important to all life, and with climate change and a quickly increasing population it will only be more important in the future. The next war s won't be over fossil fuels, they'll be about water. So we need to take extra pains to protect what we have left. Please read the following form letter and let it speak for me. Thank you. Ruth Stambaugh I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards t hat will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: W. Southworth Commenter Affiliation: Priva te Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3020 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 172 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: the EPA is responsible for protecting our environment fro m harmful effects to our citizens' health. Included in such protections is the setting of strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I very strongly support the propose d option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: Lena Moffitt Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3037 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Thank you f

or this opportunity to comment. I support strong regulations for toxic coal waste, to help protect our rivers, streams, lakes

– and the people that use them. I am so happy that your agency is moving forward with updating the Effluent Limitation Guidelines, something that hasn’t happened in over 30 years. I currently live in Washington, D.C., where the capitol power plant subjects local residents to the impacts of coal fired power generation every day. I also grew up in New Mexico, a state that still has thr ee active, coal - fired power plants. I worry about the effects of these facilities on my aging parents and my young nieces and nephews, who frequently enjoy the natural wonder of New Mexico by fishing and swimming in the Rio Grande or boating in many of our state’s gorgeous lakes. I find it incredibly alarming that none of New Mexico’s coal - fired power plants have permits to limit how much they can dump toxics like arsenic, boron, cadmium, mercury and lead into our state’s waterways. What does this mean for my 11 - year - old nephew who looks forward to going to the lake every summer? It is simply immoral that he could suffer serious health effects from this pollution, all so that major corporations can continue dumping their toxic waste into our public spaces, w ithout limit. This situation must be addressed. Thank you for taking action to protect our families, I hope you will set rigorous and enforceable standard. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 173 Commenter Name: P. Sennello Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3038 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants are supposed to add to our lives, not kill us and destroy our water and the places we live and recreate. Therefore,I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: V. Yakushchenko Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3044 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This Right action is logical and most preferred to protect all inhabitants; Humans, our food chain and Wildlife. It may be costly to corpo rations involved, but so are the health concerns and medical costs for correcting adverse health effects. Please, do what is Right for Citizens! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Lavassa ur Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3046 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 174 Safe storage of by produc ts and the indefinite monitoring of same MUST be required of all companies that continue to operate in this country. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is sensible, affordable, and already being used by some coal plants. Limi ting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. It should be finalized and put into force as soon as possible. Protect our water. Protect our liv es. Protect our planet's future.! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Lavassaur Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3046 - A1 Comment Excerp t Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Safe storage of by products and the indefinite monitoring of same MUST be required of all companies that continue to operate in this cou ntry. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is sensible, affordable, and already being used by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our w ater is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. It should be finalized and put into force as soon as possible. Protect our water. Protect our lives. Protect our planet's future.! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numb er 1 Commenter Name: L. Westbrook Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3048 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Ex cerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 175 I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" was te from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of po unds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. Existing technology can easily solve this problem and should be employed. Limiting all power plant water pollution will greatly improve the health of our waterways, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. It may even help urge power plants to look at less polluting alternatives; river turbines, solar, wind. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Harper Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3050 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I want to see "white" snow in the Fair banks winters, not dirty soot covered ground. I want to be able to eat the grayling fish out of the Chena River, not catch and release! Ducks and geese winter over in the unfrozen open waters downstream from the coal power plant, in - 40 winters! If not now , when? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Cornwell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3057 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Revie w Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 176 This is an issue that affects Republicans, Democrats, young and old. The only people who do not benefit from these regulations are those who are concerned only with profit. Please do what you can to help everyone in PA. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Eiler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3064 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Limiting all power plant water pollution will greatly improve the health of our waterways, making the water we dri nk and the fish we eat safer. The toxic pollution of Earth's water is not acceptable. The laws to prevent that must be strict and enforced. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Chandler Com menter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3065 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to insist that the EPA issue impeccable standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our air, soil, aquifers, rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste. Every year, power plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into the air, onto to soil, and into surface waters. Existing technology can easily solve this problem and should be employed. The capitulation to corporate corruption must end. Now.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 177 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numb er 1 Commenter Name: B. Coulson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3066 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Exce rpt: Thank you for allowing me to comment on power plant pollution. I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Aft er all, these power plant entities are private companies whose CEOs are using our resources for their profit while they justify fouling our environment in the name of 'reliable electricity'. They should be held to standards that don't endanger our health a nd the health of our ecosystem. Let's not go back to the days of burning rivers and let's not endanger Americans with these deadly pollutants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Wager Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3072 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. No doubt the coal fired power plant industry will fight this proposal on the grounds it will be too expensive, however it will be inconceivably more expensive to life on earth if we do not stop poisoning our lakes, rivers, oceans and acquifers. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 178 Commenter Name: C. Jansen Commenter Affiliati on: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3079 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: More than 200 other documented cases of water p ollution from coal - fired power plants have occurred because the rules governing how we treat coal ash and other waste are outdated. It is outrageous that currently, Clean Water Act standards for power plants are so weak that more than 80 percent of the per mits for these facilities have no limits on the amount of toxic heavy metals that can be discharged into our water! Therefore, Of course, electric utilities are fighting these changes and would like nothing to more than to continue business as usual. But C omment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Godmilow Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3082 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: N o External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Do you have no concern for the folks who have been living and dying near coal fired power plants? Time to act for the people, not the folks with deep pockets who make huge profits from polluting our environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Dutta Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3089 - A1 Comment Exce rpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 179 Comment Excerpt: Clean water means good health for us all. I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. People will then understand the real cost of energy. It’s time to consider what these chemicals do to our health and end this reckless practice. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Lawton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3091 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: T here is nothing more precious in our environment than the water we use in our households. Many countries do not have the resources we have for safe water. We have the knowhow to keep our water safe. Please do whatever is necessary to end Power Plant Water Pollution Today. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Scott Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3105 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. I believe that the power generation industry needs to be accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 180 Best available technology should be used to keep the public safe, because the water we rely on can no longer be a dumping ground. By far the best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. Too many streams, lakes and rivers have been poisoned by power plant water pollution. The EPA should protect local communities from this pollution by adopting the strongest possible safeguards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. Casey Commenter Affiliation: Pr ivate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3107 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: POWER plants and water don't mix! Hello, there is a dr ought going on all over the southwest, so WHY would you NOT want to use all of the POWER behind you that the Clean Water Act gives you? CONSERVATIOn is not a duirty word, bur power plant water is! WHAT will people be drinking in the future? That future ha s turned into RIGHT NOW! Maybe you should go to BASA amnd takle a look at what a plabet looks like without water. Yes..GO to pictures of MARS and then tell me HOW you will get out of that mess! Oh wait, you won't be around and none of us will be ) because the life on this planet is composed very much of WATER! If you don't want to look at pictures of MARS, then go to ariel views of the COLORADO River.....OMG,it used ti run all the way to the Pacific! Now it ends in MUD, which is exactly where we will all be IF you don't protect this most important resource, which is water, and CLEAN water at that! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: V. Mosca - Clark Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Documen t Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3108 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 181 I have a problem...it is business not being responsible for their actions. Our country is having a lot of problems with contamination to food, air, water, and land. When we get down to what is causing the issues...it is business causing it. Then we have agencies like A.L.E.X. that create bills that stops any realistic laws govern ing our health and safety. A lot of the problems in our country across the board is business. Business is not 'god'. They are responsible for their actions, personal /group. The outcome is theirs to repair / fix.Our country / congress is fighting over mone y to repair our infrastructure and it is big business that has caused all of the confusion. As an American citizen (who votes) I am furious at the games being played. As it gets even hotter, we will need all the clean water we can have. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Stott Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3109 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ext ernal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: No industry, no matter how necessary has the right to destroy the environmental balance of the planet. Being unaccountable for the destruction of our NECESSARY ecosystems, was something that occured when the population and inventors of our current technoloy were ignorant to the devastation they would be causing. We are ALL children of this planet, who rely on it's air and water for ou r existence. It doesn't matter what physical form we take or what order of species we are born into. Every creature born has a right to a healthy life. We don't have a plethera of planets to choose from if we make this one poisonous to ourselves and our co inhabitants. We have THIS ONE!!!!!! We need to respect and care for it responsibly, no matter the financial burden. Money will matter very little when none of us can breathe!!!! DO THE RIGHT THING!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Stott Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3109 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpo rated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 182 No industry, no matter how necessary has the right to destroy the environmental balance of the planet. Being unaccountable for the destruction of our NECESSARY ecosystems, was something that occured when the popul ation and inventors of our current technoloy were ignorant to the devastation they would be causing. We are ALL children of this planet, who rely on it's air and water for our existence. It doesn't matter what physical form we take or what order of species we are born into. Every creature born has a right to a healthy life. We don't have a plethera of planets to choose from if we make this one poisonous to ourselves and our coinhabitants. We have THIS ONE!!!!!! We need to respect and care for it responsibly , no matter the financial burden. Money will matter very little when none of us can breathe!!!! DO THE RIGHT THING!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Sullivan Commenter Affiliation: P rivate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3110 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's possible that homo sapiens won't completely dest roy the planet - but currently, there are few good signs that suggest otherwise. If we can't get this figured out - how to have (clean) power without polluting our most precious natural resource, water, then I think it's clear we can't effect much of anyth ing. It's the 21st century - and the technologies clearly exist (wind, solar) to provide cleaner methods of supplying power - and have for some time. Maybe it's like trying to steer the Titanic? I just know you can't hold the title of "Environmental Protec tion Agency" if you can't protect our waterways from human pollution/activities. It really is that simple (but it may require you to piss off a few power companies and to go against the grain of big money - and do the right thing for the general populace, and the planet). Are you up for it? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: H. Simpson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3111 - A1 Comment Excerp t Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 183 Comment Excerpt: Plus... Will there be any decent place left on earth to leave our children? Hopefully... But this is what makes me never want to have ch ildren, because it really seems the government and corporations do not care anything for what they leave behind... When they are not even thinking of their own children.....also it makes me mad that no ones ever held accountable for any disaster, or pollut ion. Look at Exxon! They never paid for the Valdez oil spill, but its ok for them to announce record breaking profits. or look how Japan Fukushima has ruined the whole Pacific Ocean, and our west coast. No to mention ruining all the sea life, and poor Hawa ii is ruined forever! Please fix this! We need to find other ways of power besides toxic ones! Do it now! We don't have time! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Liddell Commenter Affiliat ion: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3113 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With potable water supplies dwindling due to c limate change, and our water needs increasing as our population does,allowing our freshwater supplies to be contaminated by coal ash seems demented(at the very least,shortsighted!) Our water supplies are precious.Without clean water to drink,bathe in,and w ater our food crops with,how will we survive?There are no substitutes for water.We can develop alternative energy sources (wind power,solar,geothermal,hydroelectric,biofuels,ect ) - but there are NO "alternatives"to water!Without freshwater supplies,all livi ng things perish.I can only assume that is NOT an end you find desirable.With an eye to preserving our water supplies ,and keeping those waters clean and safe,PLEASE ensure that coal burning plants be made to clean up their act! Comment Response: See resp onse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Zwicker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3114 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 184 Comment Excerpt: Power plants dump millions of gallons of contaminated water into rivers every day. Fish swim in water poisoned by power plants. Coal - fired power plants dump millions of tons of waste each year into u nlined pits, next to communities that rely on wells for drinking water. These are but a few examples of the dozens of rivers, lakes, and streams being poisoned by power plant water pollution.I strongly urge the EPA to clean up water pollution from these po lluters and protect the waters where we drink, fish, and swim! Too many communities are drinking poisoned waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Munroe Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3115 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: First and foremost I would like to say that those who pollu te our ecosystems to the extent that they do have no right to do so. There isn't one person or a collective of voices that have the power to pollute anything that the citizens of this country depend on for our health and welfare. It's time to stop this ins ane dumping of toxic waste into our ecosystems so that it is "Out of Sight, Out of Mind".....well that archaic mind set doe's not work in this world like it used too. These companies don't seem to care that what's left of this country is NOT theirs to ruin . Do the right thing for America and the world by making these semi - gods mentality to change their ways of dealing with the garbage they toss anywhere they want. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Gecas Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3117 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 185 I'm not just "pressing a button" here I hope --- this is my true belief; that this must be done --- water is the whole ball game for every living thing, and if that's not enough why do we not have the decency to preserve water for the sake of it's self...for purity, and f or all the other organisms that depend on it. In the truest sense of the words "what goes around comes around", and if we don't start yesterday to preserve our water resources we are going to pay the hard way. I hope I don't have to find out the hard way.. .along with everyone else...if we don't start protecting our water from power plant pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: John O. Olsen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docume nt Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3123 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Its about time all polluters of our waters are made to obey the rules and clean up pollution and stop any chance of it happening. We the people of North America demand responsibility for Industrial actions which affect the environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. McCarthy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3126 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Providing energy should not be a "free card" to emit deadly pollution into our fresh water sources. We cannot compromise our health. Energy companies need to be diligent in their methods of disposing of their waste. Please exercise due diligence when identifying an d implementing standards for power companies to deal with their waste......and then, implement periodic on site inspections to ensure the standards are being followed.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 186 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Comm enter Name: G. McCarthy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3126 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Pro viding energy should not be a "free card" to emit deadly pollution into our fresh water sources. We cannot compromise our health. Energy companies need to be diligent in their methods of disposing of their waste. Please exercise due diligence when identify ing and implementing standards for power companies to deal with their waste......and then, implement periodic on site inspections to ensure the standards are being followed. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Lyon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3127 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Since I live along the Hudson River and our town's drinking water is from the Hudson... I very strongly urge you to require and enforce, extremely high standards for power plants. And to do so for all of their possible pollution... water, and air as far as I know are the worst, but using cleaner fuels, or non carbon fuels would be a great help... also how about incentives (like rebates or development money) for them to switch to solar, or develop a cleaner process. Comment Response: See response to DCN EP A - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. The other portions of the commenter’s comments about incentives are outside the scope of this rule.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 187 Commenter Name: E. Rosciam Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 08 19 - 3128 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Are you people at the EPA crazy? Why should we have to tell our own EPA to make laws to keep our water clean. I t makes no sense. Stop killing our planet in the name of greed, power, corporations, and the corporate/government. Stand tall for believing that citizens should not have to beg for non - toxic water and tell your masters who line your pockets with money that it's immoral and you won't do it anymore. NOW!!!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Hebblewhite Davidson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3130 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: WE, my family of TEN VOTERS, in WV, GA, MD, and TN, ALL ALWAYS VOTE GREEN. WE KNOW COAL COUNT RY - (WV, TN) AND we are PADDLERS. Moreover, we know the science and we follow the news. EPA and the ADministration we helped elect are postponing doing what is within Admin power...can't make Congress do the right thing? Well do what YOU can, like you sai d. WE are TIRED of EPA postponing action. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Remley Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 188 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3145 - A1 Comment E xcerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We Remleys urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater --- especial ly MERCURY. Power plants should reduce the most amount of pollution. Strong standards should limit all power plant water pollution. making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerp t Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Vandyke Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3147 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Commen t Excerpt: I will appreciate all that you do to help clean up our waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: Scott Osberg Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3155 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: it disturbs me to hear people say that we can’t afford new environmental regulations or jobs a re more important than the environment. That’s a false choice

– the right choice is jobs AND the environment. We cannot afford to let big coal and other industries keep polluting the nation’sEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 189 waterways and atmosphere. The longer we delay the more expensive and deadly the problems become. I urge the EPA to adopt strict regulations on coal - fired power plants

– the single greatest source of surface water pollution and a major contributor to greenhouse gasses. The coal industry has gotten a free ride for too lo ng – the industry makes billions of dollars and the American taxpayers pay for the pollution the coal industry creates. The technology is available and coal plants must reduce emissions and start paying for the environmental damage they cause. I’m doing al l I can to help reduce emissions that are causing climate change and I want my government to follow the science and take bold action to protect the environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter N ame: K. Bolen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3157 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I ask the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. Our energy - dependent population and the power generation industry must be accountable forvthe toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams. We should use av ailable technology, or develop new technologies, to keep public water safe for our use and the use of our children. I support EPA proposition to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to safer coal ash handling systems to entirely eliminate d ischarges of the most contaminated wastewaters. We need to keep our ponds, streams, lakes and rivers clean and pristine to support the natural environment as well as our basic human needs. The EPA is our key means to protect all local communities and keep industry from using our water resources as a dumping ground. Please adopt the strongest possible safeguard in this regard. Comment Response: See preamble to the final rule and response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 190 Commenter Name: L. Yow Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3158 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. We need to stop dumping toxic waste into our rivers and streams. Best available technology should be used to keep the water we rely on clean. By far the best option proposed b y EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to safer coal ash handling systems. We appreciate the work you have done to keep us safe. Now please protect us from this pollution by adopting the strongest possible safegua rds. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Way Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3159 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water is our right as citizens of the United States and the Clean Water Act guarantees it. Power plants are permitted as part of the public trust and must comply with these standards and clean up their past mistakes too. We must have clean water for our children, wildlife and communities to thrive. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 191 Commenter Name: S. Intilli Commen ter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3161 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA needs to take a stronger s tand on eliminating chemicals from our environment, NOT ALLOWING HIGHER LEVELS (as you have suggested happen with glyphosate!) - the EPA is beginning to lose credibility along with the FDA, and beginning to look like rubber stamp policy making agencies for corporate profit margins instead of safe guarding consumer health! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. The comment about glyphosate is outside the scope of this rulemaking.. Commenter Name: D. Grant Comm enter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3162 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The air we breath and the water drink are crucial for life on this planet. It's time that we as people stop the industry from polluting and killing our planets life source. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Gilbert Com menter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3163 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 192 Passage of the Clean Water Act called for all waters of the U.S. to be fishable, drinkable, and swimmable by 1985. Almost 30 years past that date, we have yet to come even close to that goal. It is way past the time to foster stricter discharge limitations. Comment Response: See respon se to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Liddell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3174 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Re view Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With potable water supplies dwindling due to climate change, and our water needs increasing as our population does, allowing our freshwater supplies to be contaminated by coal ash seems demented (at th e very least, shortsighted!) Our water supplies are precious. Without clean water to drink, bathe in, and water our food crops with, how will we survive? There are no substitutes for water. We can develop alternative energy sources (wind power, solar, geot hermal, hydroelectric, biofuels, ect) - but there are NO "alternatives" to water! Without freshwater supplies, all living things perish. I can only assume that is NOT an end you find desirable. With an eye to preserving our water supplies, and keeping thos e waters clean and safe, PLEASE ensure that coal burning plants be made to clean up their act! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Mckee Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Co ntrol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3175 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: To protect American waterways, I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest possible standards for power plant pollution. On behalf of the American people, the EPA must hold the power generation industry accountable for the toxic waste that it dumps into our rivers and streams.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 193 The water on which Americans rely must no longer be u sed as a "free" dumping ground for industry. Allowing this just allows the industry to externalize costs that the rest of us pay in, e.g., compromised health and medical expenses. Therefore, the best available technology should always be required and used to keep the public safe. Coal ash is toxic. It is a known killer. I understand that the best option by far, and one proposed by the EPA, is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology, and to convert to safer coal ash handling systems that will entirely eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters. One toxic, polluted stream is too many. Yet power plant water pollution has poisoned countless American streams, lakes, and rivers. The EPA should protect our people from this pollut ion by adopting the strongest possible safeguards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. Crouse Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3176 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As an emeritus member of the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS), I ask EPA to finalize the strongest propose d standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. The power generation industry must be accountable for toxic waste dumped into our rivers & streams. It can't be an "externality", out of sight, out of mind, off the books, other peoples' probl ems. Best available technology should be used to keep the public safe, & water drink can no longer be a dumping ground. The best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology, & convert to safer coal ash handling sy stems eliminating discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. Reference: "Summary for Decision - Makers", /Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis/ (Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005). Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 08 19 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 194 Commenter Name: K. Pope Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3178 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respons e: No Comment Excerpt: I realize that you probably won't read this, but I hope that you can take the long view and know that the changes you make today, will impact our future greatly. Keep working toward a cleaner tomorrow. Comment Response: See respo nse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. EPA staff notes that we did, in fact, read this comment. Commenter Name: S. Bartovics Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3179 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water resources have to be protected now - it will be essential for us to keep our water clean in the coming years as scarcity makes every drop of the 1% of the worlds water resources that are fresh, very very important! Clean water and clean air go hand in hand. Please finalize the zero discharge water pollution standards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exce rpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. Kovach Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3180 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comme nt Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 195 I urge EPA to stand up to coal lobby and work in the interests of the American people, not Big Coal. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Given Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3181 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Pollution of our water supplies MUST stop. This is a heart - felt plea to you Mr. Perciasepe to stand up to big corporations and do what is right for our country and its citizens. We rely on the EPA to keep our water in its natural state and prevent its pollution. It's a big job, but that is what the EPA missi on is, so please take that task seriously and prevent corporations from the harm they do for the all - mighty dollar. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Chandler Commenter Affiliation: Pri vate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3184 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect and clean up our air, soil and aquifers. If corporations are people, they must be adult people to be eligible to have any voice, and adults are responsible for cleaning up their own messes. Therefore, the powe r generation industry MUST be held accountable for its toxic waste ... past, present and future. As we the people cannot afford to be ill, it is incumbent upon your agency to STOP ALLOWING ENERGY PRODUCERS TO MAKE US SICK ... we don't owe their under - taxed investors a living at the cost of our very lives. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 196 Commenter Name: A. Giller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3185 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I was fortunate to grow up in a town with countless clean lakes, in which we swam & fished. Our homes all had their own we lls at that time, and the water was cool & tasty. I would love for this & the next generation, to be afforded the same. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Dunkle Commenter Affiliation: P rivate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3190 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is your job to protect our environment and the Ame rican people who live in that environment by stopping discharge of polluted water from coal power plants into streams, lakes, rivers, and anywhere that such pollution could enter existing water wells. Why do we have to appeal to you for this protection tha t you are charged with maintaining? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Hopkins Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3192 - A1 Comment Excerp t Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 197 As an individual who has had toxic levels of heavy metals and a child who had did as well at age 6 yrs, I have a strong personal stake i n this. I don't want to have to go through that again or have anyone else I know and love experience it either. Please help make changes to improve our water supply! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commen ter Name: F. Sharon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3194 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: You as acting head of the EPA have the power to make major changes to prevent further polution of our drinking water --- It is a no brainer. I ask you to please MAKE THIS HAPPEN! For Us, and for Our Children. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Drell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3196 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpo rated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am a physician and a psychiatrist. I see something that is not only a health safety issue but is insane. To allow pollution to continue is totally irresponsible and living in a fantasy. It is so destructive and blind to allow this to continue that there is no other word than insane. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 198 Commenter Name: J. Foreman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - H Q - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3197 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This should be a no brainer. Allowing coal companies to endanger the citizens of America and to poi son our precious water may work for the coal company investors but not for the rest of us. Allowing the coal companies to act this way only made sense when we didn't know the devastating effects of their abusive practices. Now we know so it's time to enact policies that improve the quality of our lives and those who will follow. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Consolazio Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3199 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's been three decades. It's time. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 08 19 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Gorsuch Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3201 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Resp onse: No Comment Excerpt: It is impossible to fathom how any person would allow theses corporations to continue to pollute our world? It is going to hurtEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 199 every species on the planet eventually! It's like you regulators think you are immune somehow from t he effects. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. Holliday Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3202 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External R eview Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is my wish as an elder to support all ways to preserve a clean, beautiful earth for my grand children and all who will follow us, into a future either ruine d and horrifying as dystopian chaos or a place to be proud of. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Balogh Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3203 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Require coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, treat smokestack scrubber sludge using zero - discharge systems, and require at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metal s like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is sensible, affordable, and already being used by some coal plants. Save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. It should be finalized and put into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 2 00 Commenter Name: G. Janzen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docume nt Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3205 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Why does the EPA even exist anymore? They are so beholden to the pollution industry, that they generally prefer to keep the polluters happy than protect US citizens from bad air and water. It's an extremely dangerous path for the citizens to be on. Power plants have been harming environment for years and they always get away wit h it. Enough already. Either stand up and do your job, or quit taking taxpayer's money. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Alex Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Nu mber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3206 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The power generation industry needs to be held accountable for their toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams! If it costs more, they need to charge for it - and find real competition in the cost of energies that do not pollute like that! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Dunkle Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3207 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 201 Comment Excerpt: It is your job to protect our environment and the American people who live in that environment by stopping discharge of polluted water from coal power plants into streams, lakes, rivers, and anywhere that such pollution could enter existing water wells. Why do we hav e to appeal to you for this protection that you are charged with maintaining? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Gibfried Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3208 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Having grown up in the Chicago land area I have watched the constant struggle over the years which has been necessary to improve & insure the quality of our water & water ways. I am not one to argue that the EPA and others have done a lot of important work in this area. It is a tremendous challenge. Today I offer my comments to ask that you again to step up as you have in the past to protect our waters from power plant pollution. I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. I believe that the power generation industry needs to be ac countable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers. Thank you for your most important contributions to this important effort. I appreciate your attention to my comments. Best wishes in your work, we are depending on you. Comment Response: See response t o DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Tracey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3210 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 202 Too many streams, lakes and rivers have been poisoned by power plant water pollution. This is so important for all of us. We can't afford to take short cuts or just choose the 'easy way out' of this situati on. The EPA should protect local communities from this pollution by adopting the strongest possible safeguards. Thank you in advance for taking the right measures to protect all of us; the rewards for your couragousness will be felt by the masses. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Snyder Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3214 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Externa l Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Best available technology should be used to keep the public safe, because the water we rely on must be kept as clean / healthy for all (people & animals) as possible. Certainly ther e is or could be technology that will help resolve this matter in an efficient manner that will benefit everyone. Perhaps if the people running the companies causing the pollution and the people enforcing the safeguards would just gather to discuss the imp ortance of clean water to everyone and everything living on Earth, solutions could be found that ultimately would cost less than lawsuits. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. Ghenoiu Comme nter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3215 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Since its very foundation the pow er generation industry has been able to transfer its long - term costs to the general public.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 203 The number of streams, lakes and rivers that have been poisoned by power plant water pollution is far higher than it ever should have been. The EPA must protect loc al communities from this pollution by adopting the strongest possible safeguards to, at the very least, keep that number from ever expanding again. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Thom ae Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3218 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Too many streams, lakes a nd rivers have been poisoned by power plant water pollution. The EPA should protect local communities from this pollution by adopting the strongest possible safeguards. The argument by power plant owners that producing zero toxic waste is simply too costly is only aimed at protecting their wallets. New technologies have been and are being developed which could achieve this result. It will not happen overnight; some of these must be installed and made operable in stages, but a start would be a good thing for our health and our environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Grant Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3219 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The air we breath and the water drink are crucial for life on this planet. It's time that we as people stop the industry from polluting an d killing our planets life source. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 204 Commenter Name: A. Cuttler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3220 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I believe that the power generation industry needs to be restrained from toxic waste dumping into our rivers and streams. Up to date tech nology should be used to keep the public safe because the water we rely on can no longer be a dumping ground and should never have been. I think the best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of contaminated waste waters entirely. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Tullis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Doc ument Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3221 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The best available technology should be used to keep the public safe. T he best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology, and to convert to safer coal ash handling systems that will entirely eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters. Too many streams, lakes and rive rs have been poisoned by power plant water pollution - the companies make huge profits, and we citizens end up paying the costs in terms of our health and our pocketbooks. That is not right! The EPA should protect local communities from this pollution by a dopting the strongest possible safeguards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 205 Commenter Name: M. Zamboni Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3222 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Owatonna Public Utilities is a wonderful service - and they are not pollutors, and those of us who live here are not either. A te rrible rain several years ago flooded the whole area and the municipal plant was ruined. It is now being redone with the old boilers being taken out, and building redone for offices and other space. WE DO NOT HAVE WATER POLLUTION in our community and hope you will do all you can to see that nobody else has it either!!!! THANK YOU. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Demetreon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3224 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Visiting relatives in the Peoria area, I remember being able to eat the fish out of the Illin ois River when I was growing up. Now, there is no way I would eat or prepare fish from it. It is so sad, I will never be able to take my grandkids fishing in the local area of the river and tr \ each them how to clean a fish, then cook it. Please do somethin g before it is too dangerous to even walk along the beaches. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Joy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3225 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 206 Comment Excerpt: Our fresh water sources are in decline; evaporation, industrial farming, fracking, air conditi oning...I could go on and on. We cannot risk poisoning more and more water. Trying to clean up is more expensive than just doing things right in the first place. Even though many Americans don't understand what's going on here, you do. Be a leader. Demand strong standards against pollution and explain "why" to the American people. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Lucas Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3227 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to prote ct our waterways. If nothing meaningful is done our watersheds will become to contaminated to use and drinking water will be scarce and expensive. Water ,soil and air are the things we need to survive. If we don't take care of these natural resources today they will be gone. We have the technology and yes it will cost more to run clean ,but the alternative is deadly. The Earth must be treated with respect. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J . Castiano Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3233 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I know we need po wer and these plant believe they have us over a barrel, but THERE IS NO WAY we should have to sacrifice our health AND lives or the health and lives of any otherEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 207 beings JUST to have power! If the owners don't want to do anything, then I say they and their families should have to use the same water as those who use the water THEY POLLUTE!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Paul Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Numbe r: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3234 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water pollution affects all citizens at every economical level. It even adversely affects our companion and food animals as well as crop health and wildlife, including fisheries. I support the EPA implementing the strongest possible standards to reduce water pollution from power plants. In the past, power plants polluted streams and rivers with relative impunity. After all, power is an essential utility needed by both residents and businesses. However, as populations have grown and the demand for power has increased, it has become obvious that we can no longer "sacrifice" our pristine waterways to the toxic industrial waste produced by power plants for their own profits. The power industry makes the money for generating precious energy... but the public and the environment pays too dearly for it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Hodie Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3237 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water is a right, not a want. Clean water is a necessity, not a luxury. Clean water is life, dirty water is.......Every living thing on Earth depends on clean water to thrive and survive. And clean water is a necessity so that our wildlife, fish. pla nrts, amd lands thrive and survive too. The EPA can and must be allowed to protect all of us. Our lives depend on it! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 208 Commenter Name: P. Sweeny Commenter Affiliation: Pri vate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3238 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed stand ards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. I believe that the power generation industry needs to be accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams. Stop allowing power plants to shift their clean up responsibilities on the general public and taxpayers who ultimately have to pay to clean up after them. We must protect our precious water resources and stop old practices of allowing free dumping in our waters, on our lands and in our air. Clean up costs must be borne by the in dustries that create the pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Hodges Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3239 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Here in my home city of Charlotte, NC, we are struggling to get Duke Energy to quit polluting our water supply with runoff from the Mount ain Island Land coal facility. How can this city, which has done so much to maintain a healthy infrastructure, tolerate the toxic chemicals such as arsenic which have been documented as a result of Duke's activities. Duke Energy makes big money for its sha reholders, but we know from experience that this company will only do what government regulators force it to do in the community's best interest. This is the ethos of big business. Therefore I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for p ower plant pollution to protect our waterways. I believe that the power generation industry needs to be accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 209 Commenter Name: S. Hathaway Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3240 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways AND THEN ENFORCE THEM instead of giving the biggest polluters a full or partial pass. I believe that the power generation industry needs to be a ccountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams. President Obama obviously believes otherwise. How about the Environmental PROTECTION Agency? So what completely inadequate measures do you plan to take instead? Too many streams, lakes, and rivers have been and are being poisoned by power plant water pollution. The EPA should, but almost certainly will decline to, protect local communities from this pollution by adopting the strongest possible safeguards AND THEN ENFORCING THEM. I am not, of course, holding my breath. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. James Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3242 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please protect rivers and streams from toxic wastes from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Nu mber 1 Commenter Name: C. Orr Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3245 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 210 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I DEMAND EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams and ENVIRONMENT from toxins! If you don't do this you are ELIMINATING the chances for any real future in this country, even the whole planet!! Is that what you are t rying to do?? It really looks like that to me. It is way past time. I dont' even think you know what "EPA" even stands for anymore!! DO YOU EVEN CARE ABOUT THE FUTURE? I love my children and humanities progeny.....please help us keep this planet ALIVE!! Co mment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Scheidler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3246 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: N o External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Adopt the strongest protections from power plant water pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Fo reman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3247 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 211 This should be a no br ainer. Allowing coal companies to endanger the citizens of America and to poison our precious water may work for the coal company investors but not for the rest of us. Allowing the coal companies to act this way only made sense when we didn't know the deva stating effects of their abusive practices. Now we know so it's time to enact policies that improve the quality of our lives and those who will follow. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Darcy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3249 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: For well over 30 years power plants have been able to dump billions of pounds of toxic chemicals and heavy metals like mercury and arsenic directly into our water

– and then some etc... It is known that power plants produce MORE than 50 PERCENT of the toxic wastes in all the Un ited State' water It is long overdue to end this reckless, harmful practices. We the people of the United States demand for STRONG STANARDS to limit[ I prefer not limit but stopping ] for ALL Power Plant Pollutioning our Waters. Ending water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, air quality making the water we drink, the fish we eat and the air we breathe safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Heeman Commenter Affilia tion: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3259 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 212 Isn't it about time that the EPA got some teeth in this act and started going after polluters like the power plants? Almost 20 years since the Clean Water Act was passed, and still many of our waters are heavily polluted. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Num ber 1 Commenter Name: I. Echegaray Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3266 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment E xcerpt: You are the Environmental Protection Agency and if you aren't going to safeguard the public's safety by making corporate polluters accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams, who will? I do not expect these corporate/pollu ting entities to wake up one morning and decide to stop making money at the expense of the public's health, but I do expect the highest level of accountability be set for them by the highest agency in the land that was created, in part, to make sure busine ss do not continue to look past short term gains without being held accountable for long term environmental impacts. We all know what will come of any other approach. I ask the EPA to protect local communities from this pollution by adopting the strongest possible safeguards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Zion Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3268 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Exter nal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I ask the EPA to please finalize a firm rule to safeguard our nation's waterways, which provide drinking water and recreational opportunities to our citiz ens, as well as habitat for wildlife, from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 213 The United States should require power plants to use the best available technology to reduce the majority of pollution that they create. Every year, these plants dump billions of pou nds of toxic and carcinogenic heavy metals such as arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters, which eventually find their way into our drinking water supply. It’s high time to end this careless practice. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: N. Frazer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3271 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incor porated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please reduce power plant pollution to protect our waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: V. Boyle Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3273 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is time for the EPA to do their job and their duty by actively a nd effectively preventing the dumping of these poisonous pollutants into our public waters. Our pubic waters should be and need to be safe from this knowing poisoning of our waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt N umber 1 Commenter Name: L. Hall Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3278 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 214 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Exce rpt: EPA, do you know and practice the full name of your agency, Environmental PROTECTIVE Agency. You do know that not only do people need and deserve clean water, fish and other occupants of streams, rivers, oceans need and deserve clean water, Wild Salmon, Coral reefs, Shrimp, to name a very few of numerous inhabitants of our waters. This is their environment to be protected not polluted as we do our beautiful gift to us all. I hope you actually give consideration to my thoughts expresses here Commen t Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. Flickinger Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3279 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I won't go so far as to say the water is "poisoned" but I will admit that there are things ending up in our water supplies that really shouldn't be there. Whatever the re ason for these materials ending up in the water; be that to save waste cost, or simple poor waste management. One must realize that allowing this toxicity to continue will only result in a far greater cost in the future, the cost of human well - being. Advan ces in technology and modern politics are meant to prevent things like this from happening. I strongly urge you to hold those responsible accountable for this threat to future health. The big picture is not about who's making the best prophets, but about t he survival of the human race and the world we live in. Protection of our fresh water supplies is one part that is vital to these goals. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Nordmeyer Comme nter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3282 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 215 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA stands for Environmental PROTECTION Agency. We Americans expect our environment to be PROTECTED by this agency, and at the highest level of protection and respect for our environment. It is with complete ignorance and arrogance that anyone would assume that toxins dumped "over the re" do not effect everyone everywhere. Perhaps it would be helpful if everyone set aside for a moment -- or two -- all the conflicting arguments and studies, and instead, use the common sense that any kindergartener would have. The earth is our backyard, our l iving room, our home. No one would tolerate the fouling of their home and property. It's imperative that we use the mindset of "minimal damage", rather than having a "what can we get away with doing?" attitude. You'd do it with your own home, right? Or do you tolerate daily frat - house ragers, trashing your place and leaving puke everywhere? It's common sense. Anyone with an IQ over 40 should be able to grasp this concept. The EPA should protect all communities from this pollution by adopting the strongest p ossible safeguards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Steinhart Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3284 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 E xternal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Pollution from power plants has poisoned the land, air, and water. You are addressing air pollution, but what is happening to water is just as bad. Pl ease finalize and implement the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. The power generation industry must not be allowed to continue to recklessly dump toxic waste into rivers and streams; it needs to clean up its act or be held accountable. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Mckee Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 216 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3285 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The water on which Americans rely must no longer be used as a "free" dumping ground for industry. Allowing this just allows the industry to extern alize costs that the rest of us pay in, e.g., compromised health and medical expenses. Therefore, the best available technology should always be required and used to keep the public safe. Coal ash is toxic. It is a known killer. I understand that the best option by far, and one proposed by the EPA, is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology, and to convert to safer coalash handling systems that will entirely eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters. One toxic, polluted stream is too many. Yet power plant water pollution has poisoned countless American streams, lakes, and rivers. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. Holden Commenter Affiliation: Private C itizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3286 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to issue STRONG standards that will do the max imum to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We have the technology to easily solve this problem and it should be utilized as soon as possible.. Limiting all power plant water pollution will make a significant impact on the health of our waterways, and on public health, as the water we drink and the fish we eat will be safer. Thank you for considering my thoughts on this issue that is critically important to me and so many others.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 217 Comment Response: See response to DCN EP A - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Pride Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3287 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpora ted into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. SOMETHING ENFORCEABLE THAT THE POWERPLANTS MUST PAY FOR INSTEAD OF PENALIZING CUSTOMERS WHO THEY ARE A LREADY OVERCHARGING!!! Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Strawn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3292 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic powe r plant wastewater. In order to protect human health, our power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. It’s time we ended this reckless and stupid practice. Clearly, the industry will not do s o on its own. The people of our nation need to act through our government to force the industry to do what it will not do, has not done, and will never do on its own. That's why I'm urging EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and str eams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 218 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Strawn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3292 - A1 Comment Exc erpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. In order to protect human health, our power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. It’s time we ended this reckless and stupid practice. Clearly, the industry will not do so on its own. The people of our nation need to act through our government to force the industry to do what it will not do, has not done, and will never do on its own. That's why I'm urging EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. E. Curry Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3294 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the government to implement strong rules for the protection of our bodies of water throughout this country, through the control of power plant waste water. Comment Re sponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 219 Commenter Name: M. Boehm Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3305 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External R eview External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: When are we as a nation/planet/human - beings going to GROW UP! The entire world needs the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. I believe that the power generation industry, municipal water abuse, as well as natural resource extraction industries must to be made totally accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams. Too many streams, lakes and rivers have been poisoned by po wer plant water pollution. The EPA, as well as the three branches of government and the lobbies that influence all, should protect local communities from this pollution by adopting the strongest possible safeguards. Comment Response: See response to DCN E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: I. and J. Berlin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3307 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is past time for the power generation industry to be accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams. Power plants should be required to install zero liquid discharge technology and co nvert to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. The EPA is responsible for protecting Americans from toxic waste not supporting polluting industries. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 220 Commenter Name: F. Glass Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3310 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Inc orporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize its strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution, in order to protect our waterways. The power generation industry can and should be treat our our rivers and streams far be tter. Water is an increasingly precious resource. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. D. Moderacki Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3311 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We depend upon water to live. Show me your level of leadership. Please finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Chandler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3312 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 221 Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect and clean up our air, soil and aquifers. If corporations are people, they must be adult people to be eligible to have any voice, and adults are responsible for cleaning up their own messes. Therefore, the power generation industry MUST be held accountable for its toxic waste ... past, present and future. As we the people cannot afford to be ill, it is incumbent upon your agency to STOP ALLOWING ENERGY PRODUCERS TO MAKE US SICK ... we don't owe their under - taxed investors a living at the cost of our very lives. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Colucci Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3314 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. I believe that the power generation industry, LIKE ALL OTHE R INDUSTRIES, needs to be accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams. You are supposed to be protecting us, I thought. When did our safety get so low on your priorities? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 226 5, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Ostrov Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3315 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: N oEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 222 Comment Excerpt: Please ensure that the United States of America can continue to be the Land of the Free. Free from pollutants in our water, air and soil. We, the American People, need you, The EPA, to ensure our well - being from people who think that pollution is fine as long as they do not personally have to suffer for it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Norris Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3316 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Businesses are in business to maximize profit and minimize cost. As we've seen, most businesses ar e under pressure from shareholders, competitors and other market forces to do so by all means. Industries whose products include pollutants will dispose of them any way they can get away with. Only government can protect us against narrow self - interest tha t compromises common interests. Please adopt and enforce strict rules against practices that threaten our future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Boettner Commenter Affiliation: Priva te Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3317 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Until we can reach a state of wholesale source control fo r pollutants from energy generation plants, our attempts to cleanup our streams and waterways is just window dressing.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 223 In addition, it is critical that we address the extreme overburden of coal ash quantities in numerous streams and waterways that threaten human inhabitants, as well as all stages of wildlife (terrestrial and aquatic). Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Zuppo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3319 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am in favor of the EPA using the strongest approach in protecting our waters from toxic coal waste. In addition to the general health concerns associated with such waste, I am also concerned as a recreational fisherman about the toxic levels of chemicals found in our fish. It is alarming that so many of our fish are not safe to eat. What are we doing to improve the quality of our water so that it is even safe for humans? We need to do whatever is necessary to clean up our streams and rivers now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Zuppo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3319 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am in favor of the EPA using the strongest approach in protecting our waters from toxic coal waste. In addition to the general health concerns associated with such waste, I am also concerned as a recreational fisherman about the toxic levels of chemicals found in our fis h. It is alarming that so many of our fish are not safe to eat. What are we doing to improve the quality of our water so that it is even safe for humans? We need to do whatever is necessary to clean up our streams and rivers now. Comment Response: See res ponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 224 Commenter Name: E. DArnal Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3321 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Even computers need up - dating. So should our EPA standards especially in light of current knowledge. let's apply our awareness through action! Thank You!! P.S. The Sierra Club for more info! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. Rossiter Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3322 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Exter nal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Fresh, clean water is vital to life. With this in mind, it is vital that the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. I believe that the power generation industry needs to be accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Milne Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3325 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 225 Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to eliminate any pollution from eve r entering our waterways. ALL industry must be held responsible for all of its toxic waste and never ever be allowed to dump anything into our aquifers, rivers, streams, lakes, ponds, wetlands, oceans, bays, etc.... Otherwise we don't need the EPA. Humanit y and Nature will take matters into it's own hands if the EPA cannot. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Walko Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3327 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Use technology to keep America safe. A poisoned or weakened citizenry cannot defend our country or make it prosper. The best option is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology. Convert to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated waste waters entirely. We need #EPS - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819. Comment Res ponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Smith - Gill Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3331 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Currently, coal - fired power plants produce more toxic waste than any other industry in the U.S., including the chemical, plastic, and paint manufacturing industries. By r equiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, the EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 226 The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is sensible, affor dable, and already being used by some coal plants. It should be finalized and put into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Fogg Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3333 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: You in the EPA need to finalize the strongest proposed stand ards for power plant pollution. As we all drink water, and use it for many additional activities, we must protect our waterways. From my point of view, the power generation industry has gotten away with toxic waste dumping into our rivers and streams for t oo long. I understand that the best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to safer coal ash handling systems. This would then eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. C omment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Baumeister Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3336 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: If you, the EPA, don't take steps to propose and enforce standards for power plants, you will leave a terrible legacy for the next generation. Power companies have no motivation to clean up, to stop dumping toxic waste into waterways. Their goal is short - term profit, not a thriving eco system.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 227 We need strong standards that stop power plant companies from polluting our waterways. We n eed power plant companies using zero liquid discharge technology. They have to convert to safer coal ash handling systems. And the EPA needs to be the one to drive this effort forward, to not succumb to industry pressure. Industry will always say "it's too hard, it's too expensive". They will never say "great idea...we can see how the investment in these more advanced technologies will protect the environment on which we all depend". So please step up to the plate and propose the strongest standards possibl e. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. Taylor Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3339 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA should protect local communities from this pollution by adopting the strongest possible safeguards. I am writing to ask the EPA to support the strongest standards for power plant pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: Richard Paul Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3342 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this important proposed rule. I am a regular on Lake Norman in NC and when traveling on the lake with in 4 - 5 miles of the Marshall Steam Station, I am very concerned about what I see regarding the discharge of effluent into Lake Norman, NC. Please see the picture attached that was taken July 8, 2013. There must be a better way and I feel that this proposal is moving us in the right direction. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 228 Commenter Name: S. Parkins Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3343 - A1 Comment Exce rpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. I believe that the pow er generation industry needs to be accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams (and air). Stopping the poisoning of America's, and the global, environment, is not only an aesthetic, spiritual and moral imperative: it is essential for a sustainable economy. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Lechner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3344 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA should finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution in order to protect our waterways. What kind of barbaric system would knowingly befoul its rivers and simply accept it as necessary? The power generation industry should be held accountable for the toxic waste it dumps into our rivers and streams. Technology to prevent this venal behavior by a utility on which everyone depends exists and it should be used to keep the public safe. It is unacceptable for the water we all rely on to be a dumping ground. By far the best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to saf er coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. These power plants have gone over the top poisoning our lakes and and rivers. The public depends on the EPA to protect local communities from this po llution. Please adopt the strongest possible safeguards.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 229 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Wallis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 33 50 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please implement extremely strong standards for power plant pollution. We have been too lax for too long and that ha s negatively affected local rivers, streams, and lakes. Act now! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Sternberg Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 3351 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our wate rways. By far the best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. To finalize any less strong standards would be unconscionable. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 230 Commenter Name: R. Mayer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3355 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please finalize the strongest standards for power plant pollution so that the best available technology must be used to keep the public safe. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Scott Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3357 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. The power generation industry needs to be accountable for their toxic waste - where ever they put it; but especially in waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Kennedy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3362 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Adopt the strongest protections from power plant wa ter pollution. This is disgusting. Stop.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 231 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Leppert Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3365 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We are depending on the EPA to protect our waterways from toxic power plant wastewater. Our surrounding states, as well as our in - state plants, should be prevented from polluting the health of our rivers, streams, & lakes with arsenic, lead, mercury & selenium. We need to have safe drinking water & fish we can eat from our waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Parr Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3366 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is life. Our world is mostly made of water. Our bodies are mostly water. The cleanest water possible is life. Our water sources need to be protected from all pollution especially toxic waste from power plants. Their wa stewater should not be allowed to be dumped into our rivers, lakes and streams. I implore you to help stop or at least regulate this practice . Our future depends on it. We count on the EPA to do the right thing! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 232 Commenter Name: M. Palmer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3370 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporat ed into Response: No Comment Excerpt: My personal note: You are in the envious position of having the power to create a healthy environment for us and future generations. Why are you not doing this? If politics are in the way, you owe it to us to expose the abuse of power and explain to the Am erican public why you can't protect us from the corporate monsters we have employed you to guard us against. Lets hear from you! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Intilli Commenter Affil iation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3374 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA needs to take a stronger stand on e liminating chemicals from our environment, NOT ALLOWING HIGHER LEVELS (as you have suggested happen with glyphosate!) - the EPA is beginning to lose credibility along with the FDA, and beginning to look like rubber stamp policy making agencies for corporat e profit margins instead of safe guarding consumer health! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Walker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3375 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 233 Once again, yet again, we need to write and petition to urge this agency to fulfill its mission of protecting the environment. Stop the industrial pollution, stop the industrial poisoning, and start taking seriously the health and well - being of the citizens and our environment. It's not enough that the bees are collapsing? It's not enough that fracking is destroying o ur water supplies? It's not enough that it's proven that the oil and gas companies are lying lying lying about what the harm they are doing? It's not enough that our soil is poisoned and nutritionally depleted or that millions of people and many many gover nments have banned GMOs? It's not enough that the ice is melting, that the Gulf is producing unhealthy fish? Someone in this agency is should be charged with environmental crimes and held liable for allowing these travesties. Do you not have the enforcemen t power to stop the corporate criminals? Stop allowing the pollution of our rivers! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Johnson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Num ber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3377 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's a known fact that our water supply is rapidly disappearing, particularly in western states, due to a prolonged, severe drought. Ultimately the water shortage will bring conflicts between the "haves" and "have not". This is a reality, so why continue to allow power plants to pollute this precious but disappearing necessity for survival? C omment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Fedrick Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3378 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 234 I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. I believe that the power generation industry needs to be accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams. I also believe that the cost of the clean up should not be passed on to the public, they've made billions and they have made a lot of people sick because of their greed. So they should inc ur the total cost of the clean up as well as some of the people that have become sick due to their arrogant attitudes about the lower middle working class. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Sabo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3381 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA should adop t the strongest proposed standards for power plant water pollution. When did our governmental watchdogs decide to become complacent when safeguarding the environment? When did corporate interests trump what is best for American citizens? Energy companies a re making record profits while being given financial subsidies. The least they should do in return is be held to the highest level of standards in regards to their polluting. Corporations have only one goal in mind: to make money. They have no incentive to do what is right when it comes to polluting. That "incentive" must come from those who have the authority to demand that they will be held accountable for their polluting. You are the people who hold this authority. The EPA must do what it is named to do: Protect the Environment. If you don't, no one will. Please, adopt the strongest possible safeguards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: S. Bartovies Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3382 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 235 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water resources have to be protected now - it will be essential for u s to keep our water clean in the coming years as scarcity makes every drop of the 1% of the worlds water resources that are fresh, very very important! Clean water and clean air go hand in hand. Please finalize the zero discharge water pollution standards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Sorrells Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3383 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We are all watching the national and global environment deteriorate right before our eyes. Anyone who is not aware of this fact for what it is finds themselves in complet e denial. What kind of example and stage are we setting for our children? "Today's warning, coming from our country's leading scientific advisors, sends an urgent message to our president and other policymakers: We need strong action, right now, to avert c limate catastrophe." ~Shaye Wolf, climate science director at the Center for Biological Diversity. I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Macor Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3384 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 236 I am writing you today to urge you to stand on the side of our waterways, for today and for future generations. We need the strongest standards to protect this vital resource. I am sure that the utility industry will try any means at their disposal to ask for loose standards, but in the end we need to ask ourselves if it is truly worth it to bow to such pressure. The people who have a vested interest in the financial success of power plants can afford to live in areas far removed from the waterways they pollute. It is the poor who will suffer, because relocation is expensive. I for one would refuse any amount of funds if I could reverse even some of the damage that pollutants have caused to our water and air. We simpl y cannot sit idly by and allow power plants to influence decision of the EPA on pollution standards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: P. Matejcek Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3385 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Too many streams, lakes, rivers and shorelines have been poisoned by power plant water pollution. The cost of generating power cleanly should be borne by consumers as a direct cost, not by the public as a corporate subsidy through degraded resources. The EPA should utilize its full regulatory power and protect local commun ities from this unnecessary pollution by adopting the strongest possible safeguards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: B. Given Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Numb er: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3387 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 237 Pollution of our water supplies MUST stop. This is a heart - felt plea to you Mr. Perciasepe to stand up to big corporations and do what is right for our country and its citizens. We rely on the EPA to keep our water in its natural state and prevent its pollution. It's a big job, but that is what the EPA mission is, so please take that task seriously and prevent corporations from the harm they do for the all - mighty dollar. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Kassem Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3388 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our water supply is under massive threats from energy production companies that so f ar appear to have no compelling reason to practice even their own safety policies, let alone monitor the newer threats that haven't been regulated yet. Once polluted, essential wells are unusable without billion - with - a - B dollar mitigation processing, as is the case in Los Angeles.. We, the taxpayers, should not have bear this burden after the corporations have made their obscene profits from tainting our natural resources. I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: J. Tache Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3389 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: My husband and I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 238 Certainly the power generation industry needs to be accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams! It is a giant industry with tremendous power to pollute --- and also to preserve and protect the most important of our nation's resources, our precious water supply!! The very best available technology MUST be used to keep the public safe, because the water we rely on can no longer be a dumping ground. By far the best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install ZERO LIQUID DISCHARGE TECHNOLOGY and con vert to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. Too many streams, lakes and rivers have been poisoned by power plant water pollution. The EPA IS MANDATED TO protect local communities fro m this pollution by adopting the strongest possible safeguards. Please guard and protect our waters!! It is the lifeblood of our nation and of our citizens' health --- which is all too often thrown away at the behest of corporate bottom lines. The corporate powers have shown themselves to be unable or unwilling to protect our waters. Our federal agencies must PLEASE hold them accountable!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Schmalz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3390 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to protect our waterways. Until the power generation industry is held to strong accountability with such standards, continuing to unleash toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams will remain the standard. Un - acceptible for EPA and un - acceptible for the nation's people you are charged to protect. Use the best technology to keep the industry honest and upholding of the higher standards, for the public safe. The water we rely on is not to remain indu stry dumping grounds, that is willfully destructive as it is unconscionable. Zero liquid discharge technology and converting to safer coal ash handling systems capable to eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely, must become your standard, baseline demand. The many streams, lakes and rivers already poisoned by power plant water pollution is the cost of your apathy, and collusion by some forces are the only thing in your way to correct the standard. So include setting those forces p acking, and denuded, this cannot stand any longer. TheEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 239 EPA must act it's role fully, and protect local communities from this pollution by adopting/enforcing the strongest possible safeguards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Blackwood Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3397 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is well past time for the nation's power plant pollution regulations to be significantly upgraded. These plants need to implement the available technology to reduce pollution and improve the quality of our water. I encourage the EP A to strengthen the rules needed to protect our waterways - lakes, rivers, and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It is time to end the dumping of billions of pounds of toxic chemicals into our water supplies. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: Lucado Family Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3410 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Inco rporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We kayak in rivers and lakes; swim in streams, rivers and lakes; fish in streams, rivers and lakes; in addition to a number of other water activities. We do our part to protect these fragile waterways by pickin g up trash in the streams every year. It saddens us to see others not doing their part to protect the waterways, specifically to see our waterways polluted by arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium that are dumped by power plants into the waterways we so che rish. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 240 Commenter Name: L. Bender Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3412 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Fl ag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As an economist, I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Setting standards is necessary as the market is unable to accomplish such preservation of vital natural resources. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: M. Everest Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3413 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please implement strong regulations to protect our water and, in turn, ourselves. Regulations need to be strict and updated. It is unconscionable that power companies are allowed to jeopardize public health and the health of our ecosystems. When coal companies externalize their costs, we all suffer. They need to be held accountable for the detrimen tal effects of their industry. Enough is enough. If it is too expensive to produce electricity from coal without polluting, then we should stop producing electricity from coal. It is the EPA's job to set standards and protect the public interest. It is not your job to guarantee the power companies' profit margins. Finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Make it illegal to dump arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. End this reckles s practice now. Thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: E. Stoehr Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3415 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 241 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please support the Environmental Protection Agency's effort to protect our water from toxic metals from power plants. It's exciting that we have t he technology to handle hazardous coal ash in a different way and protect our precious resource, water! Thank you for your time and attention. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Hanson Co mmenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3416 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Most average citizens try thei r best not to pollute our waters; it is time the power plants to do their part. We can have all the power we need to live but if our waters are polluted we are helpless -- this is just common sense. Please imlement stronger stands to curb the amount of tox ic pollutants going into our precious water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: A. Giraud Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3417 - A1 Commen t Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 242 It is vital tha t we take drastic measures TODAY to ensure our future generations will have clean water for their families. It’s time to end this reckless practice. The way Florida's utilities conduct business does not make it beneficial or conducive to clean up their tox ic water pollution. It is time that the EPA to realize that positive changes will not be made without finalizing the strongest version of this rule. Regulating utilities without the strongest rule for power plant water pollution will risk our water supplie s as many of these toxic pollutants do not degrade and are persistent in our environment and our bodies for hundreds of generations, if not longer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: N. Zuck erman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3419 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please do the job we a re paying you to do and stand with and for we - the - people, rather than the greedy coporations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Venemon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document C ontrol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3420 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must finalize the strongest of the proposed standards for power plant water pollution in order to protect our waterways and ensure human safety. The Clean Water Act mandates that EPA require dischargers to use the best available technology to reduce or eliminate their water pollution. For decades, the coal industry has beenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 243 allowed to dump millions of pounds of toxic waste into our rivers and streams without limit, and EPA now has the opportunity to create new stand ards that will protect people and the environment from this dangerous pollution. The best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges o f the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. The proposed regulation includes less stringent standards that would fall short of what the Clean Water Act requires and would not go far enough to clean up this toxic pollution. Only by enacting the toughest s tandards proposed will EPA fulfill its duty to protect people and the environment. What is it that we need to say or do to prove that clean water has become a far scarcer and much more valuable resource than coal? Even the Chinese are beginning to move awa y from coal generated power. The Chinese! Shouldn't that tell you something. What is the plan? To wait until we have to more clean water and then have hearings to see what we should do about that? Please, do not be a part of this dirty corrupt charade any longer. We still have a chance. It is small mind you, partially because there are people lobbying you NOT to clean up all of this toxic waste because their preacher has decided that the 'rapture' is right around the corner, hence, since the world is endin g, no need to clean anything. I know the US Constitution does not seem to count for much these days, unless of course we are speaking of the 2nd Amendment, but, as I recollect, there are 25 other amendments, and number one, prohibits the establishment of a national religion. Basing your decisions on the lobbying of individuals who happen to have the religious belief that the world is ending so pollution laws are irrelevant is absolutely UNCONSTITUTIONAL, as it give preference to a particular religious belie f, over, in this case, both science, reason, and most other religions. It is a fact, not a pleasant one, but, a fact nonetheless, that we are running out of clean drinking water. It is about time that you did something about to stop this situation. That wo uld be acting within the spirit of the US Constitution, as stated in the 'Preamble' to that document: "establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare,and secure the blessings of liberty to oursel ves and our posterity..." Does not securing a supply of clean drinking water comply with every single part of the Preamble to our Constitution, that I cited above. It would appear to be obvious, that if you are going to comply with the Constitution of t he United States, then the money motivated dumping of toxins in our very limited supply of drinking water should be ended post haste. Please, do not let these companies that have only their pecuniary interests at heart, further erode the authority of our C onstitution. Time to end the hypocrisy. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 244 Commenter Name: E. Jones Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3421 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We cannot live without clean water. The planet has a shortage of clean water and a growing po pulation. The EPA should be doing all that it can to safeguard this most precious natural resource. I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Tenneriello Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3422 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review I ncorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. For Our Children! That they should live and have children who can live and drink water Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: G. Wells Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3423 - A1 Comment Excerp t Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 245 Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and t he fish we eat safer. Make them pay the true cost of electricity generation using coal fired plants and then compare the cost with other methods of production. Lets go green! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Barnes Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3424 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. What's the point of rescuing the economy at the expense of the planet? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: L. Collins Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3425 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Exter nal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must finalize the strongest of the proposed standards for power plant water pollution in order to protect our waterways and ensure human safety. The Clea n Water Act mandates that EPA require dischargers to use the best available technology to reduce or eliminate their water pollution. For decades, the coal industry has been allowed to dump millions of pounds of toxic waste into our rivers and streams witho ut limit, and EPA now has the opportunity to create new standards that will protect people and the environment from this dangerous pollution. The best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to saf

er coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. The proposed regulation includes less stringent standards thatEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 246 would fall short of what the Clean Water Act requires and would not go far enough to c lean up this toxic pollution. Only by enacting the toughest standards proposed will EPA fulfill its duty to protect people and the environment. You are the Environmental Protection Agency, right?!? Choose to Respect, Cherish and Protect all the elements ne eded to sustain life, leaving the legacy of a world with bountiful bouquets of life's wellness and beauty that we have been blessed with since the beginning of time. Since water is one of the elements needed to sustain life, its protections should be manda ted with safeguards, with a guarantee of protection under the highest of standards now and for all time. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: V. Kimbal l - Speicher Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3428 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. We cannot produce more water. We need to protect this life essential resource before it is too late. Comment Respo nse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: H. Shaw Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3429 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 247 Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. The impact o f the current practice on our children is high and comes at great expense. By eliminating this pollution, the health of our children will be improved and spending on dealing with associated heath issues and learning disabilities reduced. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: D. Wiebold Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3430 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am privileged to live here in Minnesota, the land of 10,000 lakes and I am looking forward to my annual BWCAW trip. We need to keep these lakes & waters clean for future generations to al so enjoy for many years to come. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: K. Cody Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3431 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a PhD student at CU Boulder in Environmental Studies focusing on water policy in the western US, I can tell you that pollution in the w est will be far worse than anything that happens in the east if the EPA do not update these rules. Simply put, without enough water to dilute these contaminants, and given how many times water is used from the Colorado River, we're looking at much higher r isks for harmful concentrations in the stream and accumulation in organisms which use said streams. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 248 Commenter Name: F. La Monica Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Do cument Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3432 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Again, this taxpayer supported agency is not following the mandate it was created for. I urge you to use the authority given to you to protect the public, regardless o f political pressures. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. Felix Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3433 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 E xternal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Please stop and take the time to consider what we are asking. Take the time to make our water safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: T. Shoemaker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3434 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 249 It is so logical that it seems silly to have to fight for it . But fight we must. I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: R. Winn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3435 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to us e the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. As a scientist, I know that removing these pollutants from the water is not only possible, but critical. It’s time to end this reckless practice. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 Commenter Name: C. Westland Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3436 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I live in Birch Bay, WA, within 5 miles of the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal - which will be the largest coal exporting facility in North America, if permitted. Having the coal port in the waters of Puget Sound will add enormous amounts of pollution to the already existing pollution from BP Cherry Point on one side of the site, and Alcoa Aluminum Works on the other side of the site. The salmon, herring, and orcas are already endangered. PLEASE act to finalize the zero discharge water pollution standards everywhere you can. Comment Response:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 250 See preamble to the final rule and response to DCN EPA - H Q - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. The permitting of the export facility cited in the comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking. Commenter Name: J. Mcnary Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3 437 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I fish Lake Powell with my family for Striper Bass. I was alarmed when I read an article from the Arizona Departmen t of Environmental Quality informing the public to limit consumption of the bass due to elevated mercury levels. The nearby Navajo Coal Power Plant emits an estimated 1050 lbs of mercury per year. This has to stop! Comment Response: See the Environmental Assessment for the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 . Commenter Name: E. McCall Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3438 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Externa l Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Let's stop destroying our beautiful country ! We should be good stewards of this wonderful land. Our children deserve this! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 251 Commenter Name: J. Scott Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3439 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Why are industries and corporations allowed to pollute the waters on which all life depends, endangering all living things? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Donahey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3440 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our family supports strong rules to protect our water resources from power plant effluence. The waste water from power plants contains toxins including arsenic, mercury, lead, and selenium. Power plants should be legally obligated to use the best techniques available to reduce the p ollutants released into lakes, river, and streams. Current power plant practices endanger humans and other animals and should be stopped. Please act immediately to limit power plant pollution and thus protect our surface water. Comment Response: See respo nse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Polkingham Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3441 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 252 Comment Excerpt: Please do more to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Technologies are available to greatly reduce the billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and s elenium that are dumped into surface waters. It’s time to end this reckless practice. We can't afford NOT to do it! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Smeltzer Commenter Affiliation: Pr ivate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3443 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollut ion will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. If we all have to pay a little more for helping keep our rivers and waterways cleaner it is worth the price and will by far be more economical than the costs associated with treating the health problems created by this pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Brinckloe Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number : EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3445 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I lived for many years in Pittsburgh, PA -- at one time one of the most polluted cities in Am erica. It was only through the strenuous and unwavering efforts of the EPA and the resulting legislation that Pittsburgh was transformed from germ to gem. At least that is how I see it. In that spirit -- of improving and preserving our precious environment a nd national health -- I urge EPA to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Thank you.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 253 Comment Response: EPA agrees that healthy waters lead to heathy communities and economic vitality. See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Wendelgass Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3446 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge you to reject the "business as usual" options in the rulemaking that would not significantly reduce toxic discharges. Please select the "zero discharge" option that will reduce discharges to the maximum extent practi cable. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Fitzpatrick Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3452 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Re view Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Please don't delay any longer. Our's and the health of our children can't afford to wait any longer. Act now, please! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Lee Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3453 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 254 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Human beings are comprised mainly of water and we ca nnot exist on this planet without good, safe, clean drinking water. You wouldn't put human excrement into the food you eat and likewise we should not pollute the rivers and streams that are so important to a viable safe environment. As EPA officials you sh ould have the health of our environment as your number one priority and we the people are counting on you to do your job. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Wight Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3455 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I demand that the EPA act to finalize a STRONG rul e to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power - plant wastewater. As a public utility, and simply as any business, power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these pl ants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It’s time to end this reckless practice. There IS a cost to bad practices - the power plants and those who oversee them are simply shoving that cost down the line to f uture generations - and by the time our children are forced to take action, it may well be too late to reverse irreparable damage! Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, and the health of al l those - human AND animal - who depend upon them. And since everyone - even powerplant administrators, EPA administrators, politicians and voters, and those children yet too young to vote DO depends upon them, we must make the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 255 Commenter Name: K. Young Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3456 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External R eview Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters, I very strongly urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize ZERO - discharge water pollut ion standards to severely limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. This action is absolutely way past due! We must protect ourselves from this horrible pollution because it's totally clear that the power produc ers will not do it unless they are forced to! The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is very sensible, affordable, and already being used by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water WILL save lives, preven t children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. It should be finalized and put into force as soon as possible! This is simply the correct thing to do!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Mukasa Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3457 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respo nse: No Comment Excerpt: Please try your best to keep our water as safe and clean as possible! Water and air are two most fundamentally important things for us all. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 256 Commenter Name: F. Daily Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3458 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we ea t safer. Don't Power Plant operators have to drink water too? What are they thinking? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Hartman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3459 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic po wer plant wastewater. THANK YOU FOR DOING THE RIGHT THING FOR THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Conover Commenter Affiliation: Private C itizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3460 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 257 Existing laws written to limit toxics discharged from coal pl ants are 30 years old and do not cover many of the worst pollutants. The Environmental Protection Agency has repeatedly acknowledged that the existing guidelines have not kept pace with developments in the industry and have failed to address the worst poll utants in our waterways. The EPA’s new Guidelines for coal plant water pollution will, for the first time, set national standards that limit the amount of toxic chemicals that are dumped into our waterways. These standards will also require all coal plants to monitor and report the amount of toxics dumped into our water, giving us detailed information for the first time about the types and amounts of dangerous chemicals in our water. Limiting the amount of toxics in our water through commonsense standards w ill save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Hill Commenter Affiliation: Priva te Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3462 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. This letter sends a message that is a no - brainer. What happened? I thought we were making great inroads back when Clinton was president. Why is this still a political issue?! How can anyone, politically or otherwise, have anything Against preserving our limited clean water, what could their platform possibly be? Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Wynkoop Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3464 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Resp onse: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 258 Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. I was surprised to learn this practice was allowed. This should stop. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Henninger Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3467 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In Pittsburgh we depend on the rivers for our drinking water, yet gas and coal companies upstream continue to contaminate our water source unchecked. It's hard to believe that this is still happening in the 21st centur y. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Judson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3468 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. It woul d be extremely short - sighted not to finalize as strong a rule as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 259 Commenter Name: S. Brown Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3469 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: EPA, please do your job. You are an agency put in place as really the only line of defense agains t industry's dirty practices. For too long they've looked for the easy way out and need to be held accountable. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Bolam Commenter Affiliation: Private C itizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3474 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: If affordable technology is now available to prevent or treat this toxic waste, why has the coal industry not been made to adapt it? Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It’s time to end this reckless practice that endangers the health of both h uman and water populations. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. It's time to take a strong and responsible stand and end power plant w ater pollution! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Prusch Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3476 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Extern al Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 260 Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Private citizens would be fined for dumpin g in public waters, why should these companies be allowed to do the same. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Guest Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - H Q - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3477 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and str eams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. No more pollution in air or water. It's harmful and can make us sick. Please take further soon than later. I hope you understand this message. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. D. Lebel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3479 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I hope the EPA will take immediate and strong action to protect drinking water for everyone. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 261 Commenter Name: A. K. Grenier Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3481 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Rev iew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. I am an avid supporter of Cl ean Water Action and together we can make a difference. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Charlson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3483 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Do what's right for citizens and the wildlife of our rivers. We come first and power plant interests don't. Pretty simple. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Mills Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3484 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is time for the EPA to do the job for which your agency was created, and finalize the strongest possible rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 262 Every year, power plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It is not right that America's children and taxpayers bear these costs of producing power, while the power companies reap billions in profits. The EPA can require these companies to use the best available technology, to reduce toxic pollution. The companies do not own the waterways they pollute, and should not be allowed to dump poisons into them. The Environmental Protectio n Agency has a responsibility to protect our environment from these toxic chemicals. Power plants are the biggest industrial water polluters, and it is up to the EPA to stop them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Num ber 1. Commenter Name: C. Nazor Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3485 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Exce rpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. It is time to clean up American waters. Despite the best intentions, the job still lies before us. Let's get it done now - no more delays! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Galownia Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3486 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: United States Environmental Protection Agency. Please do what your name implies and protect our environment by making rules to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 263 Uniform standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water you and I and our children drink safer, and isn't t hat what your are supposed to do? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Choudhry Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3487 - A1 Comment Excerp t Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. If loopholes still exis t in Clean Water and Safe Drinking Acts, please make concerted effort at least by Sept to strengthen above legislation. Then bills or measures with more teeth can be passed that require coal and power plants to systematically upgrade their infrastructure t o prevent toxic discharges of mercury, arsenic. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Lowe Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3490 - A1 Com ment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and str eams from toxic power plant wastewater. I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. Power plants should be required t o use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury andEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 264 selenium into surface waters. Existing technology can easily solve this problem and should be employe d. Limiting all power plant water pollution will greatly improve the health of our waterways, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Weis berg Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3491 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Everyone deserves clean water, whether or not they live near a power plant. When it comes to impunity, what makes dumping by large corporations any different than pollution by one person? We are ALL responsible for the health of our water, and the health of the rest of the plane t, too! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Jay Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3493 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: EPA needs to finalize a strong rule to protect out waterways from toxic power plant wastewater. We need strong standards to will improve the health of rivers, our wa ter, and our fish. Please step up. It's why your organization exists. Thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Weber Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 265 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3494 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please do what you can for we all need to drink the water. Would you want to drink from the stream beside the coal plant or maybe you would want to take a swim in it on one of these hot summer days. Think before you do anything, like I tell my kids and everything will turn out right, thank you for your time. Comment Response: See response to DC N EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Piernot Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3495 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In 1972, passage of the Clean Water Act by Congress set a national goal to eliminate all water pollution by 1985. It's 2013 and again I strongly urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants must be required to use the best available technologies to reduce the most amount of pollution to both water and air! Every year, power plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, merc ury and selenium into surface waters. It’s time to fully enforce the 1972 Clean Water Act against, repeated, deliberate, reckless pollution practices. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, and make the water citizens and wildlife drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Wagstaff Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EP A - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3497 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 266 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is too important to ignore. its our lifeblood. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to pro tect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Seabrook Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3498 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: PLEASE PAY ATTENTION. WATER IS LIFE. THINK ABOUT OUR GRANDCHILDREN AND ALL FUTURE GENERATIONS. I urg e EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Kobbe Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3500 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to ask you to protect our rivers, lakes and str eams from toxic power plant wastewater. Why power plants are not required to reduce the amount of pollution going into our bodies of water is just crazy. Why are they allowed to do this to the detriment of our health and our children's? Every year, these p lants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 267 We need strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution. Please support strong standards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, E xcerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Olinger Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3501 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: 1982 was also the year the EPA wrote our current safeguards against coal plants dumping their toxic byproducts into our waters. We've come a long way since 1982. We know a lot more about the toxins that coal plants dump into pits, ponds, lakes, and streams. Coal - fired power plants produce more toxic waste than any other industry in the United States, including the chemical, plastic, and paint manufacturing industries. They spew millions of pounds of pollutants into our waters every year a nd they'll keep at it as long as Reagan - era EPA rules go unchanged. I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, the EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and c ertainly requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. Our communities cannot wait another 31 years to get this right. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Cornetta Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3502 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 268 Clean air & water? Basically, we need it! Please Help. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Cornetta Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Contro l Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3502 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean air & water? Basically, we need it! Please Help. Comment Response: See respo nse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Lefebvre Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3503 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Safe drinking water and safe food is good economic policy. Congress wants reduced hea lthcare costs. It doesn't do any good to get people to live "healthier lifestyles and have unsafe drinking water and food. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Hume Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3504 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 269 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It’s time to end this reckless practice. The affordability of even the strongest proposed requirements should make this a no - brainer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Grande Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3509 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Thank you for caring about the health and well - being of us citizens and all living things. Thank you for stopping senseless, needless pollution and not putting people ahead of politics. Position, money, and even jobs pale in importance, and even relevance, when stacked up against health and life itself. Please put strong, meaningful, enforceable regulations in place to ensure an outcome that supports life and health for everyone. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Williams Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3511 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: i don't use chemicals on my yard, i practice organic gardening, i don't use chemicals on my body or in my home, i only buy organic food for my family...therefore it is very important to me to reduce the pollution going into our WATER...WATER is life...our most important resource...weEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 270 can't afford to keep this up especially because of the next 7 generations...PLEASE take this seriously and think of people before profits!!! Thank you very much for listening! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Frey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3514 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ext ernal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must finalize the strongest of the proposed standards for power plant water pollution in order to protect our waterways and ensure human safety. The Cl ean Water Act mandates that EPA require dischargers to use the best available technology to reduce or eliminate their water pollution. For decades, the coal industry has been allowed to dump millions of pounds of toxic waste into our rivers and streams wit hout limit, and EPA now has the opportunity to create new standards that will protect people and the environment from this dangerous pollution. The best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to s afer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. The proposed regulation includes less stringent standards that would fall short of what the Clean Water Act requires and would not go far enough to clean up this toxic pollution. Only by enacting the toughest standards proposed will EPA fulfill its duty to protect people and the environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Durha m Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3515 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please be part of the answ er, not the problem. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 271 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Geraci Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3516 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong ru le to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste - water. It is hard to be diplomatic when their are injustices being legally committed. Please get America's head out of its rump. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Secker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3518 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Re sponse: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. EPAis the paladin of the people and the environment. Thank you for your protection. I support your actions on our behalf. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Tippin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3519 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 272 External Revie w Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is the very foundation of life, and unadulterated water is the core of good health. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and str eams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Gardner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3523 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am tired of old energy sources like coal, with outdated and environmentally - damaging processing running rough - shod over the righ ts of this country's citizens to have safe waterways and protection for our natural lands. It is more than time for our lawmakers to grow consciences and craft strict laws to protect our water fr selfish polluting industries. Comment Response: See respon se to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Webb Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3524 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Revi ew Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We've waited too long. It's time the EPA finalizes a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We've been putting ourselves on the line far too long, risking everyone's health and our children's brain power. PLEASE FINALIZE A VERY STRONG RULE. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 273 Commenter Name: J. Lent Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3526 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please enact a strong rule to hold power plants to very high standards for their wast ewater. The Clean Water Act was intended to prevent the damage power plants are currently doing to our rivers and lakes. This damage is unnecessary given current technology. Our health and that of our environment should not be sacrificed to industry profit s. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Smith Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3528 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants are always trying to do an end run around regulations. They need to comply with the law just like every other industry. Don't let them get away with pollutio n. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Lynwood Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3529 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Fla g: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 274 PLEASE protect our rivers - for people's health as well as wildlife's!!! More polluting chemicals are what is NOT needed. Power plants need to clean up their act. Comme nt Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Brayton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3531 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I would also ask you to consider that these same power p lants are polluting our air and contributing to climate change. The toll on our collective health and on the economy, as two of many examples, is deplorable. Please do all you can to stop this wide - spread destruction. Comment Response: See response to D CN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Pratt Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3532 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Inc orporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. It is unforgivable that this pollution is still ongoing in this day and age. History is filled with industry crying about onerous regulations and spending a sizable amount of the money that could be used to solve the problem, instead going to lobbyists and lawyers inEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 275 order to obstruct meaningful reform. Please do not let this continue. Comment Response : See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Marsilli Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3533 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Rev iew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our EPA must protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We cannot afford to wait until there is little Clean water to salvage Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Dobrzelewski Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3534 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please protect our water; rivers, streams, lakes from the toxicity of power plant waste water. Clean water is a gift. It is our responsibility to be good stewards. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Harmful chemicals are being released into these waters. Not only do they have an effect on humans but also vulnerable plant and animal life. Please implement stronger standards to limit power plant water pollution. We have an obligation to keep our water clean from contaminants for us and for future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 276 Commenter Name: R. Hil l Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3536 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA’s job is to protec t our waterways (and air, and land) and ensure human safety. You have not being doing your JOB, and everyone knows it. When you go home at night, your wife, husband, or partner KNOWS. The Clean Water Act mandates that EPA require dischargers to use the bes t available technology to reduce or eliminate their water pollution. For decades, the coal industry has been ALLOWED to dump millions of pounds of toxic waste into our rivers and streams without limit, and EPA now has the opportunity to create new standard s that will protect people and the environment from this dangerous pollution. The best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of t he most contaminated wastewaters entirely. The proposed regulation includes less stringent standards that would fall short of what the Clean Water Act requires and would not go far enough to clean up this toxic pollution. WHY has this been proposed?! Only by enacting the toughest standards proposed will EPA fulfill its duty to protect people and the environment. Are you going to do that? Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Higgins Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3540 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Let's give the gift of clean water to our children and grandchildren. Our children are our greatest gift.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 277 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Rosin Commenter Affiliation: Priv ate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3541 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Don't allow people to put coal in the water. This could kill fish and plants. This could also make them sick. Anything that eats enough of those organisms can get sick too. If certain humans eat enough of those poisoned fish, then they'll get poisoned too. They 'll the have to go to the hospital, and pay thousa nds of dollars. The same could happen to the animals that eat those fish. And it won't even be those people's or animals' faults. It'll be the fault of those who polluted the water. I was told that you care a lot about the environment. I bet you'll care ab out this situation. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. J. Patterson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3542 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: You have been empowered to protect the planet's environment by representatives we elected. Though your funding has been reduced you must halt mone y hungry, power mad corporations from their grab for unaccountability. You have our support. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Gies Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Cont rol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3544 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 278 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support the Environmental Protection Agency zero - discharge water pollution stan dards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants (and I trust there are current standards that cover the other sources of water pollution or that this standard will). I am told that the standards,were applied t o coal plants will remove hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, thus eliminating millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. And that smokestack scrubber sludge will be treated using zero - discharge systems to remove t oxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. I understand that the Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposal is sensible, affordable, and already being successfully used by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in ou r water will prevent people from getting sick, and will ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. The stringent EPA standards should be finalized and put into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final ru le and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Bresnan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3545 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Despite living in middle class suburban west St. Louis County, our family has had to deal with heavy metal poisoning, mostly mercury and lead. Despite treatment and large improvement, we are still highly sensitive to heavy metal exposures and continue to have effects. Please make our land and water safer for our children and grandchildren than it has been for us. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 279 Commenter Name: E. L. Stanley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3546 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I live in a town that burns its garbage with coal, tons of it coming in every day in train cars. I even doubt the cleanliness of the exhaust smoke. I lived across from the Mohave Generating Station in Laughlin, Nevada which did the same thing and I suffered greatly at that time with my asthma. Here I am a bit better but quite a ways from the garbage burning. I know we need to do something with our garbage and we need energy but there must be better ways and if we cannot avoid coal, use al l the technology possible to make it clean, clean, clean and keep our water pristine. We NEED water, more even than we need energy. A FACT FOR LIFE. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. L. Stanley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3546 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I live in a town that burns its garbage with coal, tons of it coming in every day in train cars. I even doubt the cleanliness of the exhaust smoke. I lived across from the Mohave Generating Station in Laughlin, Nevada which did the same thing and I suffered greatly at that time with my asthma. Here I am a bit better but quite a ways from the garbage burning. I know we need to do something with our garbage and we need energy but there must be better ways and if we cannot avoid coal, use all the technology possible to make it clean, clean, clean and keep our water pristine. We NEED water, more even than we need energy. A FACT FOR LIFE. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 280 Commenter Name: T. Lawlis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3547 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge you to do everything you can to keep our water suppl y clean, even if it means going against the coal industry. Don't let company profit get in the way of health. Please protect us!! Read up on what the Sierra Club has to say. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Hawley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3548 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency must finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals discharged from power plants. Requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems would eliminate millions of gal lons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can be treated using zero - discharge systems and treatments to remove selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water is crucial. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Lee Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3550 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 281 External Review Flag: No External Review Exte rnal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must finalize the strongest of the proposed standards for power plant water pollution in order to protect our waterways and ensure human safety. The Cle an Water Act mandates that EPA require dischargers to use the best available technology to reduce or eliminate their water pollution. For decades, the coal industry has been allowed to dump millions of pounds of toxic waste into our rivers and streams with out limit, and EPA now has the opportunity to create new standards that will protect people and the environment from this dangerous pollution. This is LONG OVERDUE! Our rivers and streams should have NEVER been a dumping ground for industries and now we ha ve to deal with the pollution! The best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. The proposed regulation includes less stringent standards that would fall short of what the Clean Water Act requires and would not go far enough to clean up this toxic pollution. Only by enacting the toughest standards proposed will EPA fulfill its duty to pro tect people and the environment. It is our RIGHT to have clean water and it's YOUR JOB to protect our water and our air from industries pollution. Please return my faith in the EPA and do the right thing for the American people rather than for industry. TH ANK YOU! Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. High Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3551 - A1 Com ment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 282 Please help do your job and help keep our country and the envoronment safe and clean for the future and our children! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Cravatta Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3553 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Clean Water Act mandates that EPA require dischargers to use the best available technology to reduce or eliminate their water pollution. For decades, the coal industry has been allowed to dump millions of pounds of toxic waste into our rivers and streams without limit, and the EPA now has the opportunity to cre ate new standards that will protect people and the environment from this practice. The best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. The problem is that proposed regulation includes less stringent standards that would fall short of what the Clean Water Act requires and would not go far enough to clean up this toxic pollution. Only by enact ing the TOUGHEST standards will the EPA fulfill its duty. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Walker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docume nt Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3554 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 283 With so many groups united behind the adoption of Option 5, the EPA has en ough support to not cave to the industrial polluters. The quality of our waters is a national health issue. The corporations should be held liable for flouting the rules, they should be prevented them from continuing to foul our environment and the EPA sho uld monitor and enforce strict compliance. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Sowerwine Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3555 - A1 Comm ent Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Clean Water Act mandates that EPA require dischargers to use the best available technology to reduce or eliminate their wa ter pollution. For decades, the coal industry has been allowed to dump millions of pounds of toxic waste into our rivers and streams without limit. The EPA now has the opportunity to create new standards that will protect people and the environment from th is dangerous pollution. The best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. Only by ena cting the toughest standards proposed will EPA fulfill its duty to protect people and the environment. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Capoun C ommenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3558 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 284 Comment Excerpt: As a chemistry major and retired science teacher who began teaching Environmental Science to high school students in the early 1970's with simple units on water pollution, air pollution, land polution, etc, I realise the wisdom of the EPA's plan and hope i t is not sabbatoged by political and financial forces. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Asmus Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3559 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing you personally in order to urge the EPA as forcefully as I can to act immediately to write and issue the strong standards needed to mandate the widest protections for our rivers, lakes and streams. Specifically, it is not acceptable that toxic power plants be allowed to casually and seriously pollute the vast quantities of wastewater they pour into the envir onment. I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. Power plants should be required to use the best available technol ogy to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. Existing technology can easily solve this problem and should be employed. Limiting all power plant wate r pollution will greatly improve the health of our waterways, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Todd Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3560 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 28 5 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please issue strong standards to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. Power plants should be req uired to use available technology adequate to reduce all significant pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. Existing technology can easily solve this problem and should be emp loyed. Limiting all power plant water pollution will greatly improve the health of our waterways, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer as well as protecting them for future generations. As I understand it, the above is your job. Please do i t. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Knight Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3561 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag : No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Coal - fired power plants are dumping wastewater that contains metals and other harmful chemicals into the Great Lakes and their tributaries. I lived my first 20 years on the Great Lakes. Gerald Ford was my congressman. This summer I showed my Nebraska grandsons the beaches I still love, Sleeping Bear Dunes and the Soo locks. To think the water that is at risk in so many ways can be protected by stronger rules regarding was tewater will push innovation and produce jobs and save the water for their grandchildren. I urge you to finalize a strong rule to protect the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants should be required to use the best technology available to "dry handle" waste fromEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 286 fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for scrubber sludge waste. This "zero liquid discharge" technology will eliminate release of the most highly contaminated wastewaters entirely. Make our drinking water healthier and our fish safer to eat. Issue the strongest possible rules to protect the Grea t Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Kowalski Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Nu mber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3562 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a new grandmother, I care about the world that will be left to my grandson and I wan t my government to look at long term outcomes rather than short term monetary returns for investors. Please take this step to control toxic output into our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commente r Name: D. Crowley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3563 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge E PA to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can be treated to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 287 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P.Schutt Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3564 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number : 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Nothing is more importanat to me and my family than clean air and clean water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Hay Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Contr ol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3565 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber s ludge waste. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. Existing technology can e asily solve this problem and should be employed. If that means that power becomes more expensive to users, then so be it. Users can cut down on the power they consume and lobby their utility boards to limit cost increases. As things stand, the costs of pol lution are externalized to those who suffer the health consequences. Power companies have to accept the costs of not polluting our water.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 288 Limiting all power plant water pollution will greatly improve the health of our waterways, making the water we drink a nd the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Joy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3566 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Allowing our power plants to pollute our water is not okay. We can live with a little less hea t, a little less air conditioning and a little more brown grass but WE CANNOT LIVE without clean drinking water and the stress on fresh water is already happening here in the U.S. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Num ber 1. Commenter Name: R. McCombs Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3567 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Ex cerpt: The fossil fuel companies must put their waste where it doesn't affect our water. I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 289 Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to r educe the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. Existing technology can easily solve this problem and should be employed. Limiting all power plant water pollut ion will greatly improve the health of our waterways, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. James Commenter Affiliation: Private Citize n Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3568 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am a direct beneficiary of the Great Lakes. My potable water com es from Lake Michigan. As I age, I more clearly see the personal and environmental damage caused by accumulated toxins from industrial, agricultural and transportation industries operations. The EPA can do much to reduce the toxic loads being dumped into o ur Great Leaks. I urge you to finalize a strong rule to protect the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Coffmon Commenter Affiliation: Priv ate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3571 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We NEED EXTREMELY POTENT safeguards put into place for o ur water nationwide and we need it NOW! There's too many toxins being allowed too infiltrate our waterways through coal fired power plants!! It needs stopped "yesterday"!! THAT'S how urgent it is becoming! Do NOT allow our water to become carry toxic waste any longer....LIVES are atEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 290 stake! Implement restrictions and regulations to prohibit toxic wastewater! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Sky Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3573 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need the strongest possible safeguards against toxic wastewater. How do the owners of the coal - fired power plants feel that they will be able to avoid suffering from contaminated water? With millions of pounds of pollutants from chemical, plastic, and paint manufacturing industries being dumped into our water, we're not only killing ourselves, we're killing all life on this planet. Who could possibly be spared? How stupid is that?? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Davis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3575 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water is essential to ALL life. Do what you kn ow to be right, and not what you feel pressured to do by big corporations. In the end... they will not save us. Thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 291 Commenter Name: D. Dunn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3577 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Just because it is cost effective or easy to poison our waters and destroy our environment doesn't mean that it is permissible or ethical. Treating our environment like this sets an unethical example and precedence to society and leads people to treat each other the same way - with blind ignorance to abuse and death. It would be wrong to relieve ourselves into water that we need to drink tomorrow and is just as wrong to poison the water that our societies will need to use in the future. Do the right thing and protect our natural resources. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Lowden Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3578 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please Note: The coal companies, along with mining, petrochemical. and oil have been using Mother Earth as an outhouse since the beginning of the industrial revolution and just like human o uthouses it has been filled to the point of making us all sick! So, not to take action now is a virtual disaster pending -- if not a death sentence for us, Homo - sapiens, and most other living entities. Please, take action now before it is too late. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Hoekstra Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3579 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Exte rnal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 292 Comment Excerpt: To drastically limit the amount of toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead from continuing to pollute our lakes, rivers and streams, it's the responsibility of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to finalize zero discharge water pollution standards by requiring dirty coal fired power plants to remove hazardous coal ash with dry systems and smokestack scrubbers that don't rely on water. In helping to elim inate systems that generate millions of gallons of wastewater every year, the EPA's job and responsibility is to ensure that our water is safe to drink and our fish are safe to eat. The strongest approach in dealing with any dirty antiquated coal fired pow er plant is to make sure they operate within the law, operate efficiently and effectively with the best and newest technologies available, and continually promote innovations that promote the environment and our long term well being. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Abernathy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3583 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I write to urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power pla nts, especially coal - fired power plants Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Rhodes Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3584 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please protect Tennessee's water from toxic coal waste. The TVA's Allen coal plant is authorized to send millions of gallons of it s coal waste to the Mississippi River and McKellar Lake without any limits on its pollution. At TVA's Gallatin coal plant, toxic wastes are discharged into popularEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 293 Old Hickory Lake reservoir and the Cumberland River, which flows through Nashville. I grew u p playing, boating, fishing and swimming at Old Hickory Lake and still drive there as a family outing. We would NEVER get into the water or eat fish from the lake now as it is too dangerous. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265 , Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Schmidt Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3586 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I live downstream from the Gallatin Steam Plant. I fish and swim in the Cumberland River. I want, deserve and demand that TVA do all it can to keep this river clean.. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Ex cerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Melton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3587 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Co mment Excerpt: I have kids and grandkids as I am sure some of you do. Please keep our water ways clean. As you guys know on down the road whats in our water and food affects our health. I pray that these words do not reenter your mind as you hold a child of yours as they pass to heaven. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. It should be finalized and put into force as soon as possib le. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 294 Commenter Name: K. Mostek Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3588 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Fla g: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The coal industry needs to step up to the plate for the sake of the people rather than for the sake of their profits. All the technology they need is already in place f or clean coal...Why not use it? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Mostek Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3588 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The coal industry needs to step up to the plate for the sake of the people rather than for the sake of their profits. All the technology t hey need is already in place for clean coal...Why not use it? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Nelson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 3590 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The power industry's refusal to upgrade their plants is no longer acceptable. In every human society, persons who poison their neighbors' water are considered criminal maniacs. If the poisoners wear three piece suits and inhabit corporate offices, it doesn't make them less crazy, or less criminal.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 295 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Ex cerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. & S. Kallio Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3592 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have long been concerned about the lack of control over highly toxic coal combustion waste, which has already led to unacceptable levels of arsenic, mercury, selenium and other elements dangerous to humans and wildlife. The time to control and isolate this dangerous waste stream is lone overdue. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Ventura Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 3594 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a Michigander living on the shore of Lake Superior, I have a very strong sense of what clean water is a bout. I see clean (relatively) water every day. However, I have traveled along the shores and into the cities along the other Great Lakes. I have seen DIRTY, POLLUTED waters in these locations. These other Great Lakes were once as pristine as Lake Superior . They can become pristine again, but only if we act now! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. R. Baldwin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 3595 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 296 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to I SSUE THE STRONGEST NEW REGULATIONS AND ENFORCE TODAY zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. PLEASE! TURN UP THE HEAT ON COAL BURNING ENERGY UTILITIES NOW! TODAY! PU T PRESSURE ON CONGRESS PERSONS AND SENATORS WHO ARE NOT SUPPORTING RESPONSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION NOW, YES TODAY! SHOW OUR NATIONS POLLUTERS THAT YOU HAVE TEETH AND ARE BITING BAD ACTORS TODAY! ~The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest propo sed approach is sensible, affordable, and already being used by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. It should b e put into force TODAY! YOU CAN ATTEND TO FINESSE AND FINALIZATION TOMORROW! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Clough Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3597 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Coal is a cheap source of energy partially because the coal plants don't take responsibility or pay the costs of safely handling their waste. They let the taxpayers pay for water treatment plants to clean the water they pollute. And they put people at risk exposing them to polluted water. And they seriously compromise one of our most valuable and be autiful resources - the Great Lakes and connected waterways. This has gone on much too long - it must be stopped and DTE will only stop polluting when the EPA makes them - DO IT NOW. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 297 Commenter Name: J. Wood Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3598 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water is what we need and clean water is what we demand. By allowing the pollution of our water you as making us sick. It is time to stand up and finalize zero - discharge water pollution. Energy companies be damned, they don't care about th e common good, only about their greed and profits. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Williams Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3599 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is gold in Michigan. As a former Texan, I know Michiganders need to look at there water as the most precious thin g on the planet and treat it that way. The masses will be looking to these lakes as the planet warms. Now is the time to protect and preserve it! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Nelso n Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3600 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am 74 years old, grew up in a Mississippi river town and well remember the smell and look of its polluted waters. On a recent visitEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 298 to my home town, I was delighted and amazed at the difference made by decades of clean up and anti - pollution measures. If the Mississippi could be c leaned up, we in Tennessee can also have clean rivers and lakes. Please do everything possible to get rid of the coal ash in our waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Gumbarevic Com menter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3602 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. We are all part of the same environment that you have been hired to protect. Don't do it for me, do it for yourself, do it for everyone! Comment Response: See response to D CN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Leslie Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3603 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review In corporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: What don't you understand about why people don't want their water polluted? This isn't the 19th century you know? I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 299 Commenter Name: C. Baldwin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3604 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Ext ernal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Having recently retired from a 42 - year career in organic chemistry, it is clear to me that we are "fouling our nest" with the continued use of coal, but until we can transition to safer alternative energy sources we must try to ensure that the use of coal is as safe as possible. Thus, enforceable water pollution standards that limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants is the best approach to solving the problem for the present. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Pyle Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 3605 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I cannot believe that in this day and age we would even be considering going backward rather than forward with our environmental regulation. We know more now than ever before about how interwoven and fragile our biological systems are! You have a wonderful opportunity to protect our water for the coming generations. Please don't squander this opportunity. Comm ent Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. J. Lorenz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3606 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 300 I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. There are better ways to do things, have the courage to cha nge things for the better while you are in office!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Glen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3608 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge the EPA to require zero - discharge pollution standards that limit how much toxic metal can be dumped i nto our waterways by coal - fired power plants. If power plants move coal ash with dry systems rather than water, millions of gallons of hazardous waste water would not be produced each year.Smokestack scrubber sludge should also be treated using zero disch arge systems. Our lakes and rivers are not dumping grounds and heavy metals and other hazardous materials should not be released into them. We need to keep our water clean for human consumption, wildlife and recreational purposes. It is the only water we h ave. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: F. Grabenhofer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3609 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Revi ew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Make our drinking water healthier and our fish safer to eat. Issue the strongest possible rules to protect the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 301 Commenter Name: S. Lannin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3610 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: N o External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am deeply concerned that of the 18 active coal power plants here in Illinois, only 5 of them have permits which limit dumping of any toxic metal. None of these permits li mit arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or lead. None of these plants report how much toxic arsenic and selenium they discharge in the EPA's Toxics Release Inventory, and many of these plants do not even monitor how much of these toxic pollutants they discharge. I worry about the impact of these toxic discharges on our Illinois water bodies, especially those which have been formally designated as having impaired water quality, including the Illinois and Chicago Rivers. As a Life Member of the Sierra Club, and a conc erned citizen, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be discharged into our waters from power plants. I applaud the Environmental Protection Agency with putting forth a strong, sensible, and affordable safeguards to protect our water quality. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will protect public health and our environment. Please finalize and put into force these requirements as soon as possibl e. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Carpenter Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3612 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arse nic, lead, mercury andEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 302 selenium into surface waters. It’s time to end dumping costs on the environment and start sharing them with the developers and their customers. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Comm enter Name: J. Crooke Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3613 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Nobod y should be afraid to swim in the Potomac River (that's the river closest to me). Or any river in the US, for that matter. Unfortunately, that's the situation for the Potomac and many other rivers, thanks in large part to power plant pollution that has gon e unchecked for too long. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Wellman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3614 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Clean Water Act was passed in 1972, including a goal to eliminate all water pollution by 1985. It's 2014, and the power plants continue to du mp toxic waste into our waters, as if they were their personal sewers. Don't we need an agency that will enforce this Act? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Rich Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3615 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 303 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In our modern times of amazing technology, there is no excuse for water pollution. It is just a matter of wanting it badly enough. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265 , Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Hart Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3616 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. As a resident of Michigan, I'm acutely aware of the value of our water resources and the necessity to protect them for futur e generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Nauer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3617 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We should not have to fight this battle over and over. It's time the power companies realize that they should be stewards of the environment as well as suppli ers of electricity, and if it costs more so be it -- power users should have to pay. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 304 Commenter Name: E. Kane Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Numb er: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3619 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I realize that coal fired power plants may be necessary to supply us with electricity to suit our needs, but these plants are allowed dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters every year. That is unacceptable. There are now affordable methods of reducing the toxic pollutants dumped into our waters, and power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Again, I urge the EPA to set stronger standards to protect ourwater, ourselves and our children. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Colon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3620 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is essential for life, but not if it is full of toxic substances. Businesses and utilities have been allowed to pollute vital water resources for far too long. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Young Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docu ment Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3621 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 305 Comment Excerpt: Enact legislation NOW so EPA can better protect our rivers, lakes and st reams from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Connie S. Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3622 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This issue isn't j ust about cleaner water now but for the future health of citizens and the environment. Cleanup is always many times more expensive them common sense preventive measures and much of the harm cannot be undone. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Whitaker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3623 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: While I am not a Sierra Club member; I do agree with them that we need to do all we can to protect and clean up our environment. There have been far too many "accidents" from storage of hazardous materials and way too much leniency in making sure that our environment is safe and health for everyone. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 306 Commenter Name: D. Rienstra Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Nu mber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3624 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a resident of beautiful Michigan, I am especially concerned about preserving clean w ater and improving environmental safety. Therefore, I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commen ter Name: J. Szetela Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3628 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Coal m ay help us become less dependent on Oil but it should be much more friendly to the environment. Making coal viable as a non polluting source of energy should be more important than using it as a short term solution to energy while making long term problems for the environment and our climate. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Desmet Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3629 - A1 Comment Exce rpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 307 You are the EPA, if y ou won't protect the environment there is no reason for your existence. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Dunlap Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3631 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Someone has to speak up for those without the power and money to defend our most precious natu ral resource. Without clean water, life as we know it, can't continue. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Leonard Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3634 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I fished all of my life just east of the toxic site at the foot of Rosa Parks Boulevard (12th st) fr om childhood with my father and brothers, as I grew older with my nephews and nieces and now my great nephews and nieces. I remember the pollution that was in the Detroit River when all of the industrial plants were dumping wastewater into it and have watc hed it turn from brown to blue as the River has healed itself over the last 40 years. I have caught everything from rainbow trout and salmon to walleye and silver bass there. I am sure if you look at all the laws on the books, it is criminal for them to co ntaminate the river. In addition, if you look into the storage facilities billionaire owner Matty Moroun, you will find he has no problem breaking the law and in fact was jailed by a judge in the last few years in a dispute with the Michigan Department of Transportation. Do the right thing. For the children.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 308 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Gilchrist Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3637 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please, Environmental Protection Agency, finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into Michigan's waters from power plants. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is sensible, affordable, and already being used by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of poll ution in our water will save lives, prevent children from sickness, ensure our water is safe to drink, and our fish safe to eat. Finalize and put the standards into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. V. Amerongen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3640 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respon se: No Comment Excerpt: Once the pollution is on the water, it is very expensive if not impossible to remove. Birth defects and ill health are increasing health care costs. Once the Ohio river burned, now it does not. Please take a stand for our water supply. It us a limited resource and cannot be manufactured. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Frank Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 3646 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 309 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I was really surprised to hear that in 2013 toxics can still be released into the Great Lakes. I believe these discharges need to be severely restrained. Aside from the drinking water impacts, metals bioaccumulate, making the fish unsafe to eat, causing consumption advisories in the Great Lakes. This affects the economy in Great Lakes states as well. Comment Respo nse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. P. Peritore Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3648 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Today’s power plant water pollution standards are woefully out of date, and 4 out of 5 plants lack any limits on the toxic metals they are allowed to emit. There are seve ral known cases where this wastewater is discharged directly into drinking water reservoirs such as Mountain Island Lake in Charlotte, NC. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Dr. C. Pinter C ommenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3649 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a resident of the area bor dering Lake Michigan for 71 years, many members of our family have been prohibited from their rightful use of the lake for swimming, boating, and catching and eating fish on many occasions due to the advisories relating to toxic levels of metals and harmfu lEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 310 chemicals into the lake. And so, I urge you to finalize a strong rule to protect the Great Lakes and all citizens exposed to the toxic effects from toxic power plant wastewater. Please make drinking water healthier and fish safer to eat not only for us a nd our families, but also for generations to come. Consider the great legacy you are now capable of leaving for our children and their children's children. I urgent you to issue the strongest possible rules to protect the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Davis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3651 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Coal - fired power plants are dumping wastewater that contains metals and other harmful chemicals into the Great Lakes and their tributaries. Exposure to these toxic substances - which include arsenic, lead and mercury - can cause cancer, birth defects, developmental problems in children and other health problems. Mercury can make fish unsafe to eat and is the primary cause of fish consumption advisories in the G reat Lakes. I urge you to finalize a strong rule to protect the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants should be required to use the best technology available to "dry handle" waste from fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation t reatment for scrubber sludge waste. This "zero liquid discharge" technology will eliminate release of the most highly contaminated wastewaters entirely. Make our drinking water healthier and our fish safer to eat. Issue the strongest possible rules to prot ect the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Davis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3651 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 311 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Me and my family live in the Great Lakes basin and rely on Lake Michigan for our drinking water. We are relying on you to keep that water safe to drink. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. C. H. Gampper Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3653 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Besides, the chemical poisoning all around and across the board, in this case of our water, must be stopped promptly without fail. EPA, please do your work in the interest of our nation's, citizens', and environmental well being ~ ... un - influenced by interfering corporate interests! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Kozel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3654 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge you to fina lize a strong rule to protect the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. I am 60 years old. I grew up near Cleveland, and I remember the increasingly dire warnings about the pollution in Lake Erie. Swimming became hazardous, as did going out in boa ts that could allow water to be splashed on passengers. The perch were deemed inedible due to uglyEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 312 sores and strange growths on their bodies. The lake was declared to be dying. When the EPA was established, pollution control was implemented, and things imp roved gradually - very gradually. Please don't erase the progress that has been made in the last 45 years. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Schibline Commenter Affiliation: Private Ci tizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3655 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am in my 20s and have already accepted that I will have to c lean up many messes of the generations before me, but our nation's waterways must be protected from these toxic chemicals spewing from an unregulated, multi - million dollar industry. I want to show my children and grandchildren how the natural environment c an shape your life, I don't want to have to show polluted water that is filled with harmful chemicals. We are stewards to this planet, we need to show that leadership NOW. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Kolberg Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3657 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Though it boggles my brain how anyone could Ever think it was a good idea, Coal - fired power plants are dumping wastewater that contains metals and other hazardous chemicals into the precious, priceless Great Lakes and their tributaries. As the EPA's websi te further elaborates, exposure to these toxic substances - including arsenic, lead and mercury - cause Cancer, Birth Defects, neurological and developmental problems in children and other horrific health disasters. Mercury makes fish unsafe to eat and is the primary cause of fish consumption advisories in the Great Lakes. As a woman of childbearing age, this is of concern to me.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 313 There is no time to lose. I urge you to finalize a strong rule to protect the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Powe r plants should be required to use the best technology available to "dry handle" waste from fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for scrubber sludge waste. This "zero liquid discharge" technology will eliminate release of the most high ly contaminated wastewaters entirely. Besides, what are they doing Not Making USE of this byproduct? Isn't it downright anti - capitalistic not to turn waste into something better? Please, help make our drinking water healthier and our fish safer to eat. Wit h great respect, I humbly demand that you issue the strongest possible rules to protect the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Thank you for doing what is right in defending what is possibly our most precious resource: the Great Lakes. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. DeRose Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3659 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Extern al Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have lived on Lake Michigan's shoreline for my entire life. I fish on the lake, even though my family can't eat the fish. My well is adjacent to the lake and I worry about contam ination. We live between the Oak Creek and Waukegan power plants. The cancer rate in this area is great. I am a pediatric dentist and long ago installed a mercury abatement amalgam separator at my expense to protect the water. Dentistry emits 1% of the mer cury found in lakes. Yet, coal burning plants are not required to remove their mercury. I urge you to finalize a strong rule to protect the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Crouse Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3660 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 314 Comment Excerpt: Coal - fired power plants are dumping wastewater containing heavy metals & other potent chemical poisons including arsenic, lead, & neurotoxic mercury into the Great Lakes & their tributaries, causing cancer, birth defects, & developmental damage in children. Mercury bioaccumulates in fish, the primary cause of fish consumption advisories in the Great Lakes. As an emeritus member of the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS), I ask you to finalize an effectively strong rule to pr otect the Great Lakes from more poisoned power plant wastewater. Power plants must be required to use the best technology available to "dry handle" waste from fly & bottom ash ponds & to use evaporation treatment for scrubber sludge waste. This zero liquid discharge technology will eliminate continued release of the most highly contaminated wastewaters entirely. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Fa ron Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3661 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I live in Lombard IL and my drinking water comes from Lake Michigan. I expect that your agency will act as intended to protect the quality of our water source so that it is fit for human and wildlife consumption. The EPA must not close its eyes to the toxic pollution that is bein g dumped into the people's essential life element. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Leutwiler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3662 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 315 Comment Excerpt: I live near the Waukegan, IL coal fired power plant. This facility releases eight million gallons of polluted water in to Lake Michigan every day. We obtain our water supply from the lake, and also recreate on it and swim in it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Lannin Commenter Affiliation: Private Ci tizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3664 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Coal - fired power plants discharge wastewater that contains metals and other toxic chemicals into the Great Lakes and the rivers and streams that flow into them. Exposure to arsenic, lead and mercury can cause cancer, birth defects, developmental problems in children and other health problems. Mercury can make fish unsafe to eat and is the primary cause of fish consumption advisories in the Great Lakes and on other waterbodies throughout the Midwest and nationally. Please finalize a strong rule to protect the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Require po wer plants to use the best technology available to "dry handle" waste from fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for scrubber sludge waste. This "zero liquid discharge" technology can completely eliminate release of the most highly cont aminated wastewaters. The EPA was created and given authorization to protect public health and the environment. Certainly working to ensure that our drinking water is healthier and that our fish are safer to eat falls within that responsibility. I urge y ou to promulgate the strongest possible rules to protect the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Kirksey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3665 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 316 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stop the dumping. I grew up in Michigan and moved to Colorado in 1981. For 30 years i dreamed of moving back to be by the Greatest lake in the world - Lake Michigan. In 2011, I was able to make this happened and could not be happier. Now i am concerned about the health of these beautiful bodies if water and am begging you to something to prevent the dumping of coal plant wastewater that contains metals and other harmful chemicals. Please, please, please, I urge you to finalize a strong rule to protect the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Power pla nts should be required to use the best technology available to "dry handle" waste from fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for scrubber sludge waste. This "zero liquid discharge" technology will eliminate release of the most highly co ntaminated wastewaters entirely. I love these Lakes and want them to be healthy long into the future Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Hayes Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docu ment Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3666 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have learned that coal - fired power plants are dumping wastewater that contains metals and other harmful chemicals into the Great Lakes and their tributaries. I guess that I am not all that surprised, considering what coal - fired power plants have been allowed to do over the years, but I am writing to ask that the EPA make thi s a priority. I realize that these plants will have to spend money to change the situation but it is past time that they do this. Please finalize a strong rule to protect the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. There is technology available to e liminate most of the contaminated water and I believe that the agency should require its use. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 317 Commenter Name: C. Bennett Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3667 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our lakes and rivers should not be garbage dumps for industrial waste! This j ust makes sense. The people who drink that water or eat the fish should not have to worry about getting cancer or other ailments from it. Duh! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. DiScenna Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3668 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am an elementary school t eacher in northeast Ohio. I understand that many policies require compromise between opposing positions. Especially in Ohio and our south - east bordering states, stores of coal may be the only resources that have successfully employed significant numbers of laborers. The transition from carbon - based fuel sources for energy production to alternative sources is a very slow one in our society. However, as a parent, a citizen and a teacher, I am concerned about any activity which will further pollute our waterwa ys. It is unethical and immoral for this generation to burden future generations with "cleaning up" our messes. In particular, Lake Erie, the shallowest and most life - rich of the Great Lakes, is even more susceptible to the short - and long - term effects of pollution than the other Great Lakes. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 318 Commenter Name: G. Opem Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3669 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have owned a house only a few miles south of the Wisconsin Energies Oak Creek coal - fired power plant along Lake Michigan. Our co mmunity tried to get the plant to convert to natural gas a few years ago when they were expanding to no avail. Of course, the people of Racine are much poorer economically than the people who live near the Port Washington power plan north of Milwaukee, and which was converted to natural gas. I guess money talks. Please do not let that happen again and install new standards that will ensure our drinking water and fish we eat from the Lake will have reduced amounts of mercury and other dangerous metals and co ntaminants. Also, don't let power companies get away with storing coal ash with inadequate protection so it tumbles into the Great Lakes as happened at the Oak Creek plants a few years ago. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, E xcerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Imam Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3672 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Great Lakes and the creatures therein and those that depend on it were created by GOD. As such, it is vitally important that we help to protect the Great Lakes. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Collings Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3673 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 319 Comme nt Excerpt: My family regularly swims in Lake Michigan and I hate to think of all the toxic pollution we are being exposed to just for a day at the beach. We love Lake Michigan and want to see it be as clean as possible so our children can enjoy the lake , too! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Rothenberg Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3674 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Rev iew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Among these are mercury, lead and arsenic which have long been known to be contained in this wastewater. And we know beyond a doubt that these things harm living things including babies, children, and all humans as well as other living things that can't defend themselves. It is unconscionable that we continue to dump these into our water, knowing exactly the irreversible harm we are doing. Comment Response: See r esponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Ross Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3675 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: WATER IS MORE VALUABLE THAN GOLD! THIS IS THE SAYING IN THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST. AND IT WILL BECOME YOUR SAYING TOO AS THE ATMOSPHERE HEATS UP. IN THE WEST WE ARE SEEING MORE AND MORE DROUGHT CONDITI ONS YEAR AFTER YEAR. PLEASE HAVE THE FORESIGHT TO PLAN AHEAD AND VEHEMENTLY PROTECT ANY AND ALL CLEAN, NON SALINE WATER WE HAVE ON THIS CONTINENT!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 320 Commenter Name: L. St urm Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3677 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. (1) require coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water (2) require treatment of smokesta ck scrubber sludge using zero - discharge systems and biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is sensible, affordable, and alr eady being used by some coal plants. Please protect human life and well - being, by protecting humans and the ecosystems we rely on. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: U. C. Burton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3679 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With our own military prepping for water wars, we need to ensure that Americans have safe water -- and that corporations aren't ruining the supply permanently. This is happening with fracking. This is happening with runoff and dumping from power plants. But you can do something about it. An d almost were, until election time. Grow some spine and stand up to corporate welfare. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 321 Commenter Name: K. Peterson Dadant Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3680 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please act now to protect our waterways! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Yang Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3681 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Inc orporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have children and someday my children will have children too. The world is made up of 70 percent of water but only 1 percent is drinkable, what am I suppose to do and how am I going tell my children and thei r children that there's no more water because I either can't afford it because once we run low, the prices will go up or even better we run out. Do you really think that we can afford to go to war over water as the same that we do for other natural resourc es, for example fossil fuels? I hope you not only see this point of view but feel this matter in your heart and let it sink in so you know and understand that water is not optional like fossil fuel. Water is unavoidable. You may not know me and I may not k now you... You may say and think my opinion doesn't matter and you may think you have the upper hand in this situation but the undeniable truth is, I really have the upper hand and that's why I call on you to make a good decision for me and for all my fell ow citizens. We need to do something right away about this matter. You may say and think there's a bigger problem besides clean water but this is the source of the problem. Solve it like your back in school still trying to get that degree or still reaching your goals, and I know it just doesn't take you or me or some of us to make a difference but at the end if all things if this mission shall rise or fail, I at least what to be able to say and know and that if someone ask where we're you when our water wen t bad at least we can say, "I was at the front fighting for the cause". Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 322 Commenter Name: S. Hershey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - H Q - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3682 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have been told that the Ameren Labadie Power Station discharges 25 million gallons of untreated toxic water into the Missouri River floodplain EVERY DAY. How anyone can think that's acceptable is troubling. What's more troubling is that it has been going on for over a decade, and apparently having an expired discharge permit is no hindrance....for 10 years. How is that acceptable? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Alt Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3683 - A1 Comment Excerpt Numbe r: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. My family and I live less than 3 miles from the Missouri River. The Missouri River provides drinking water to over 50% of Missourians. We are currently battling for our lives and the healthy lives of our children into the future because a coal fired plant that has been in countless vio lations is asking to build another 800+ acre dumpsite directly in the floodway of the River. Please we beg you to protect us. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. D. Metzger Commenter Affi liation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3688 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 323 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need the strongest possible safeguards against toxic wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: F. and A. Raetzer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3690 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge EPA to finalize strong Effluent Limitation Guidelines for Steam Electric Power Generating plants requiring zero disch arge. Please pass strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution to improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Clemenzi Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3691 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt : I am writing to ask that the EPA to strongly limit power plant effluent in streams to zero. There is no reason we must allow pollution when technology is available to avoid it. This technology and various techniques exist to limit stream pollution, and the only reason for the power company's fighting it is greed -- an unwillingness to spend the time and effort required to stop pollution.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 324 Please finalize strong limits for all power plant water pollution. This is a matter of the people's health and well b eing -- a priority that you should take more seriously than power company greed. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Leigh Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number : EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3692 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. REMEMBER=we cannot survive without good, CLEAN, PURE water!!! not rich, not poor, & now with world s glaciers melting FAST we R loosing the largest amount ever!!! So doubly important 2 PROTECT!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Bonsall Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docume nt Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3693 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I live in Labadie, Missouri right near one of the largest coal plants in t he country. Their track records is abysmal and the Missouri DNR has turned their back on water violations. You MUST act to protect our precious waterways. States are not doing it. ELG requiring zero dischrage are do - able and will encourage energy policy aw ay from dirty coal. PLEASE. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Matesic Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 325 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3694 - A1 Comment Excerpt Numbe r: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge EPA to adopt strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution, in order to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. Every year, power plants dump tons of arsenic, lead, mercury and other contaminants into surface waters. New Effluent Limitation Guidelines need to set a standard for no discharge of toxic heavy metals into water that people depend on for drinking, fishing and recreation. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the amount of pollution to make the fish we eat and the water we drink safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Falcon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3695 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean, free - running water is essential to a healthy ecology -- and can be used to generate clean, sustainable hydroelectric power. But we are destroying the quality and usefulness of our wa ter supply by using it as a sewer for the residue of outmoded dirty energy technologies which need to be cleaned up immediately, and shut down as soon as possible. I urge the EPA to finalize the strongest proposed standards for power plant pollution to pro tect our waterways. I believe that the power generation industry needs to be accountable for the toxic waste dumped into our rivers and streams. Nor should it be allowed to pollute the groundwater by fracking. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Rushing Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3696 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 326 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporate d into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to accelerate efforts to protect our most important natural resource - water. Without it, we do not exist. There is no place to go, no backup plan, we do not know at what point the system shuts down. We should be doing all we can to lessen our impact. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Griffith Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3697 - A 1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is time to end the power plant industries’ unlimited permit to pollute. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to prote ct our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Goldberg Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3698 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am greatly concerned about the toxic pollutants that power plants dump into rivers, lakes an d streams. The passage of the clean water act in 1972 congress set a national goal to eliminate all water pollution by 1985. We are now 28 years past this congressional deadline and power plants are still allowed to contribute more than half of all toxic p ollutions being discharged into surface water!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 327 How can our government allow this to happen! Arsenic, boron, cadmium, selenium, lead and mercury are just some of the toxic metals poisoning our water sources. Exposure to these toxic metals can cause birth de fects, cancer and other health problems. Do you realize that due to your negligence more than 23,000 miles of rivers and streams are contaminated with power plant wastewater? Did you care that its unsafe to eat fish from 38% of our nations surface waters! And still despite these terrible statistics

– 4 out of 5 coal plants in the U.S. have No Limits on amounts of toxic metals that power plants are allowed to dump into our water!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numbe r 1. Commenter Name: Seirra Club Mass Mail Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3699 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No C omment Excerpt: Holding coal plants and other industrial sources accountable for the air pollution and water pollution they cause is essential to protecting public health and the environment and tackling climate change. On April 19th, the Environmental P rotection Agency proposed new water pollution standards (also known as Effluent Limitation Guidelines or "ELG") to reduce toxic wastewater discharge from power plants. Power plants are responsible for more than half of all the nation's toxic water pollutio n, dumping millions of pounds of poisons such as mercury arsenic and selenium into our rivers and streams each year. Current water pollution standards have not been updated for 31 years and 4 out of 5 plants lack any limits on the amount of toxic metals th ey emit. EPA must finalize strong standards to ensure that toxic water pollution is cleaned up. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. McEntee Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3701 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 328 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our family urges the EPA to implement strong standards to protect ou r rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the amount of pollutants including arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium dumped into surface waters each year. Gener ations to come should be entitled to safer drinking water and safer fish to eat. Please limit ALL power plant water pollution to improve the health of our rivers and streams . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Linda (surname illegible) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3702 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: PLEASE finalize a strong rule of the EPA to PROTECT our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants dump BILLIONS of pounds of HEAVY METALS and poisons like arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into our water supply. Our drinking water is being poisoned as are our wildlife, fish, shellfish and recreational water sources. All power plants should be required to use all technology available to stop all pollutants before they reach our water supply and endang er our health and the health of our streams and rivers. I have had pesticide poisoning and my health was so compromised that I lost my job because I was too weak and ill to work and it concerns me that we have so many sources of toxins in our air and water which bit by bit erode the health and safety of this very small planet we need to live on. Our water supply is finite. No amount of industry’s profits is an excuse for poisons in our drinking water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 08 19 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 329 Commenter Name: sponsoring organization unknown (paper) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3704 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: On April 19th, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed new water pollution standards (also known as Effluent Limitation Guidelines or "ELG") to reduce toxic wastewater discharge from power plan ts. EPA studies demonstrate that power plants are responsible for more than half of all the toxic water pollution discharged into our lakes and rivers. We, the undersigned, want EPA to finalize strong standards to ensure that toxic water pollution is clean ed up. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Gaikezheyongai Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3705 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Externa l Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: What with the Great Lakes Protection Act and Strategy, the Canada - Ontario Agreement, surely some piece of legislation must accomplish what you all purport t o do - protect the quality of the Great Lakes' waters so people can drink it, swim in it, eat the fish in it, and enjoy the water without risking one's health or life by doing so. It is vital big companies and plants are not allowed to pollute these waters which are a source of drinking water to populations on both sides of the Canada and US borders. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Hawkins Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docume nt Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3707 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 330 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of our rivers, streams and oceans making the water safer for drinking and recreation and the fish safer to eat. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. L. Nunes Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3708 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect ou r rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. Pilgram Power plant in Plymouth Massachusetts is a prime example of this. We need stronger standards to limit all power plant pollution and improve the health of rivers, streams and oceans mak ing the water we drink and fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Leonard Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3710 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's amazing to me that we have to sign a petition like this to keep POISON out of our water. In ciites we can get a ticke t or arrested for putting anything that could harm the water supply in the gutters or streets that could be washed into the water or seep into the ground to harm ground water supplies..Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 331 Why on Earth do big companies not live by same rules...Two words....MO NEY and GREED! Pure Bullshit! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Caminiti Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3711 - A1 Comment Excerpt Nu mber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am more sensitive than most people. When I take showers in large cities (outside Maine), it burns my skin. I get a rash. I can smell it, a nd taste it. It's awful when this is what I have to fuel my life. It is inescapable and I can't even describe to you the suffering it causes me. Water is the source of all life. We have cleaner water in Maine than we do in most places. Let us please keep i t that way! - To give us more sensitive people a standing healthy chance. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Coba Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3712 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water should be important to everyone. If one person stops to care then we all start to not ca re. I believe in taking care of the Earth we live on because sooner or later we won't have a place to live on. Plus, it will kill the cycle of life....its starts with the water and go from there. Save the Water!!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EP A - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 332 Commenter Name: K. Hugenschmidt Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3713 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review I ncorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Up to 60 percent of the human body is water, the brain is composed of 70 percent water, and the lungs are nearly 90 percent water. About 83 percent of our blood is water, which helps digest our food, transpo rt waste, and control body temperature. Each day humans must replace 2.4 litres of water, some through drinking and the rest taken by the body from the foods eaten. (Source: ga.water.usgs.gov/ed u/propertyyou.html ) Additionally, our Planet is about 75% Water. Every River and Steam eventually flows into the Ocean. Through the cycle of evaporation and condensation, that water falls back to Earth as Rain...and carries all that poison with it. So we a re not just poisoning our Water, but poisoning the Earth and all the food it produces...and the People who eat that food and take it into their chromosomes and genetic materials, and pass it on to their progeny. And yes, that means you are agreeing to pois on YOUR own Children, Grandchildren and Great Grandchildren. Would you serve up toxic waste at YOUR Thanksgiving Dinner Table to those you love??? You are in a position to DO something for EVERYBODY'S Children. SO DO IT! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. and B. Ditzler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3715 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plant pollution is contaminating the air we breathe and the water we drink - thereby causing serious harm the health of our citizens. Every year, power plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. Requiring them to follow best practices and use best available technology would greatly reduce the amount of pollution they now release. Please, please, please do what's right to protect the health o f our citizens. We're almost 30 years past the deadline Congress set for eliminating water pollution. Strong standards to severely limitEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 333 pollution from power plants need to be set to make the water we drink as well as the fish we eat safer. Comment Respons e: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Wilson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3716 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Revi ew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water is So Very Important and Vital to our health and our lives! I've seen more people than I can count get sick, get cancer, and even die, and I believe it has something to do wit h the water, soil or air around here, and I Strongly feel that someone Needs to do something ASAP!!! It's sad, it's devastating and it's depressing! Someone really needs to step up and Do Something Now!! Thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EP A - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Gilling Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3719 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorp orated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We cannot have healthy children and live healthy lives without clean water. Just look at what is ha ppening in China. We must do better! The Great Lakes are a treasure we must protect. It’s time to end this dangerous practice. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 334 Commenter Name: M. Cavender Commenter Affil iation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3721 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I can't believe the government would allow the power plants to dump disgusting waste into the rivers and lakes! We need to keep our world clean for the future generations. I don't even want to drink city water from my tap, I have to filter all my water just to be sure I'm not allowing to let chemic als infect my body from the nasty water they're allowing to flow through our systems of river and lakes. Something needs to change. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. DePietto Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3722 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule t o protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We have to protect our water for our children and our future generations of children! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Morse Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3723 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 335 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. This is a no - brainer. End this practice now, and force non - toxic solutions. There is no greater resource than clean water and only a fool would continue p olluting the resource that enables all of life. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Von Hoffman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3725 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I live in one of the most toxic states in the US -- let's not make it even worse!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Schuller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3726 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a Minnesotan who swims, fishes and enjoys the scenic beauty of our waterways, I strongly urg e the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 336 Commenter Name: S. Westhoff Commenter Affiliation: Privat e Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3727 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers , lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. The cost of this ongoing pollution is too high. We pay the price with our health and the health of our natural resources (fresh water, fisheries, and environment). Comment Response: See response to DC N EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Armstrong Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3728 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: To protect current water quality for future generations, I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. There has to be some cost to compani es who use polluting methods. It is now time to recognize that we must pay for preserving or improving the quality of our environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Berger Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3730 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 337 Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. If we don't set an example, why should any other nation make extra efforts to protect the planet's drinking water? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Baker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3731 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ex ternal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I have 2 children and want this done for them and all children after. Comment R esponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. R. Reichow Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3733 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Ext ernal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We must refuse to give in to the power of the greed y Republican backed power industry. The technology has been available for a long time but this group has decided to spend billions on lawyers instead of solutions to this countries pollution issues. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 338 Commenter Name: R. Kingsley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3734 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Res ponse: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Would you really want to drink water from the discharge area even if "treated"? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: U. Nilsen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3735 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Our children and all life depends on clean sources of water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Riehl Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3736 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 339 I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. I can't tell you how disappointed I am with the Obama administration. Shame! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Fitzpatrick Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3737 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review F lag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. All of o ur waterways and watersheds should also be protected from coal mining operations and mine tailings at the top of the chain of electric generation impacts. Industry - written rules which eliminated protection of streams should be repealed and revisited to ens ure effective protection of all our water resources. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Mayer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3738 - A 1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Why should industry be allowed to pollute public waters? The rivers and streams and lakes don't belong to private compan ies or pubic utilities, they are generally common resources of the public at large just like the air. Either that or pay to clean up the mess they make. I can't just dump my household trash in the street. Why should power plants be allowed to dump their tr ash in rivers and lakes? It is common sense that it makes no sense. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 340 Commenter Name: D. M. Hickey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3740 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: There is a clear connection between power plants and water pollution. There is no excuse for not acti ng NOW, versus later. If the EPA does not act now to create rules without loopholes, you are giving into politics. Protect our planet. Without it we are nothing. It may not be an easy path, but it is the right path. Comment Response: See response to DCN E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Ruth M. Phelps Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3741 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review I ncorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We'll always need power and we'll always need water. We might as well have a healthy ecosystem in which to enjoy our power, don't you think. Please stand up to those who want to save money rather than keep o ur water clean!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Carla White Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3742 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 341 I pay taxes to cover the costs of cl eaning up my garbage, why should't power companies? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Jed Holtzman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3743 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Currently, nearly 70% of coal - fired power plants are allowed to dump unlimited amounts of arse nic, lead, boron, cadmium, mercury and selenium directly into water bodies across the country. Worse, some plants discharge these toxic metals into water bodies that are already contaminated with these same metals or are upstream of communities drinking wa ter! This is outrageous. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. That's your job. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Toby Hankin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3746 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge you to m ake the health of individuals, communities and the environment your first priority as you set pollution standards for power plants. The citizens of our country are counting on you for that. Thank you for your attention. Comment Response: See response to D CN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 342 Commenter Name: Rebecca Hammond Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3748 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Rev iew Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: States like Michigan depend on water for every aspect of our lives. Our tourist industry, farming industry, fishing industries require clean water. We are each only here on this planet for a short time. Each of us needs to pass along the best and cleanest world to our children. We need protection against toxic wastewater; it's just your job. Thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M ary Breymann Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3749 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please don't le t corporate interests ruin our water! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Curt Volkmann Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3750 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please finalize the strongest possible rules to stop coal - fired power plants from dumping toxic wastewater into the Great Lakes an d their tributaries.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 343 I am a resident of Lake Forest, IL where we draw our drinking water from intake pipes in Lake Michigan approximately 8 miles south of the Waukegan coal plant. With the frequent north - to south flow of water along the western shore of La ke Michigan, there is a reasonable likelihood that contaminants from the plant's coal ash can enter our drinking water supply. Lake Forest is not alone half of Illinois' population relies on Lake Michigan for their drinking water. Furthermore, as you may k now, the retention time or time it takes for contaminants to naturally cycle through Lake Michigan is 99 years. This means that any mercury, arsenic, lead or other toxic pollutants from the Waukegan coal plant that go into the lake today will remain in the lake for my great great grandchildren to deal with. The Great Lakes and their various ecosystems are under tremendous stress from warming temperatures, invasive species and a wide variety of pollutants. We urgently need action from all relevant state, pro vincial and federal agencies to preserve and protect these precious natural resources. Please make our drinking water healthier and our fish safer to eat. Thank you in advance for issuing the strongest possible rules to protect the Great Lakes from toxic p ower plant wastewater Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Sheila Dillon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3751 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It's time to make the finite amou nt of fresh water we have safer for humans and wildlife. No more toxic dumping allowed. No more pesticide runnoffs. No more fracking waste to contaminate the water more. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. C ommenter Name: D. Singer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3752 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 344 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. In the Clean Water Act in 1972 Congress set a national goal to eliminate all water pollution by 1985. We can't wait any more. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: William Dent Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3753 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Revie w External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Why we must end power plant water pollution: I believe we are responsible to God for the care of creation, and I am committed, to the extent that it is up to me, to leave a livable world f or coming generations. Therefore, I join with the people of Clean Water Action in urging EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Glenn Marshall Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3755 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External R eview External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 345 We need limits on what is allowed to be discharged into our water. That limit should be set at zero for those toxic materials like Mercury, Fluoride, Arsenic, etc. Thank you for caring for our health. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Ellen Schousboe Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3756 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stop the flood of toxic waste spewed into our drinking water, lakes, rivers, wetlands, and aquifers by coal plants. This is some of the worst, most dangerous toxic waste in the nation, and it's just being dumped in our water with no oversight! This is completely backwards and unacceptable. Mercury, lead, and arsenic do NOT belong in our drinking water, and the EPA should have enacted a zero - tole rance policy to poisoning our water long ago. Clean drinking water is a human right. Poisoning and killing people and wildlife is NOT anyone's right. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Andy Bauer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3757 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With all due respect, why is this even being discussed? Would you feed your child food that was only 20%, or 10%, or just 1% posion? No Way. Common Sense Please! Keep these toxins contained. I urge EPA to finalize ironclad rules to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from to xic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 346 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Marcia Chuvarsky Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3759 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I think that it is becom ing obvious to us all that we have a quality - of - life vs. corporate profit conflict here. Rich and poor alike need clean water to drink. Drought makes water supply more critical than ever. The American rich seem to be getting richer. So, corporate profit is an "also ran." Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Morita Bruce Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3760 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Ext ernal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Why isn't industry required to stop harmful pollution? My 2 - year - old learned and obeyed the rules "don't hurt others" and "if you mess it, YOU clean it". Surely business can -- and must -- abide by those same basic rules. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Conlan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - H Q - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3762 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 347 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please let's mandate that all power plants must reduce the amount of pollution they are allowed to dump into the water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. DaCosta Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3764 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 E xternal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's time for the EPA to act -- and to to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Dumping bil lions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters is bad for everyone. To keep us safe, strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution are needed ASAP! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exc erpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Oliver Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3765 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Com ment Excerpt: We must all work to keep our water clean and safe! I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 348 Commenter Name: K. Tharin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3766 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a resident of both Chicago and Holland, MI, every day of my life is spent marveling at what is Lake Michigan. With two young children, I know we must take action now to protect this fresh water gift in front of us. After serving in the Peace Corps in Central America, I quickly learned that one of life's most important resources is clean water. I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Malacarne Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3767 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology for maximum reduction of pollution. Because they are a necessary part of the grid that supports our modern society they should be managed for the greater good of all. This includes future generations. Please don't let big business poison our little grandkids. We need stronger standards to limit all power plant water pollution, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comm ent Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 349 Commenter Name: J. Sexton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3769 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Ex ternal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am a city dweller and have a degree in Civil Engineering. My family and I have been living and dying with cancer and leukemia for the last 25 years. I will likely die of leuk emia or colon cancer believing as my grandmother and father did that these cancers had their beginnings in city drinking water that was not effectively purified. I know that removing heavy metals is not an option for a city like Baltimore with a shrinking tax base. The wise and economical way would be to keep heavy metals and other toxins out of the water supply. Power plants and other industries in this country have not taken responsibility for the damage done by their dumping. I urge my government to stop giving tax breaks to these profit making businesses and legislate this responsibility before cities like Baltimore become uninhabitable. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Nicely Commen ter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3770 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong ru le to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Please protect our children and grand children! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Westman Commenter Affili ation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3771 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 350 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: PLEASE PROTECT OUR RIVERS, LAKES, AND STREAM S! I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Simpson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3772 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: CLEAN WATER, AIR, SOIL AND FOOD IS A NATURAL BORN DI VINE RIGHT SUCH AS THE RIGHTS TO PURSUE HEALTH AND HAPPINESS. I believe we Have been given life to engage in caring for others and for our Earth home. Since humans are the only species stupid enough to poison humanity and all living things, it just follows that The responsibility for cleansing and purification IS SCREAMING FOR HELP EVERYWHERE ON EARTH!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Bales Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3773 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. In particular, please require Dynegy to clean up the toxic waste they have placed on the banks of the Middle Fork of the Vermilion River, this is Illinois only scenic river. I had assumed this classification protect ed it from pollution. Hundreds of citizens of Illinois worked over twentyEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 351 years to get this clean river protected, we thought. Please make Dynegy clean up their waste so that it does no further damage to the Middle Fork. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Unruh Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3775 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review In corporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am dismayed that the long - term health of our environment is often the victim of short - sighted concerns. Having strong industry and a strong job market matters not if our rivers, streams and lakes are pollut ed. The people need reliable sources of clean, safe water to survive. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Heaps Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3776 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment E xcerpt: Eight Power Plants in the state! Seven are putting unregulated amounts of toxins and heavy metals (cadmium, arsenic, mercury etc.) into our water and lakes. Why?! Put a stop to this! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265 , Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 352 Commenter Name: H. Strong Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3777 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: N o Comment Excerpt: It's unacceptable that we aren't using the strongest standards and the most recent technology to prevent persistant chemicals from being released into our waterways. This affects all americans. As young american I expect to be living i n the United States for the rest of my life and I am not only thinking of my life and my health but the health of my family in the future. This is not an issue to be taken lightly. Act and act fast. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Laurie Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3780 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Have seen a tremendous degradation in the weather and atmosphere and water ever since they fired up the coal fired plant near OIA here near Orlando. We need to go to the alternatives. This planet depends on clean air and water without contaminants. Our rivers, lakes and streams are dying because of these polluters - the time for the EPA to take action on these large power companies is NOW! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Hoefferle Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3781 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 353 Please make the coal fired power plants clean up their operations and stop the miners from exporting coal to companies whose processes are even dirtier than our own. The mines are ruining our water! In Kentucky counties where the purity of water made fi ne finest whiskey, people now have to buy drinking water by the gallon in stores. Cottage industry has shifted from making whiskey to growing pot. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Shal liker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3782 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In an era when freshwa ter is an ever - more - precious resource, how can we tolerate the level of pollution with which coal - fired plants flood our land and water? Members of the EPA must act in a genuinely protective manner of our environment - ultimately, each person in government who stands up for genuine environmental protections and reform will know he/she has served our country, our world, and fulfilled a positive personal mission towards an enlightened future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Ex cerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Johnson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3783 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Co mment Excerpt: The citizens of the United States shouldn't have to ask you to insure that we have clean water. We have to ask the EPA for clean water? I understand that you are up against powerful corporations who want to dump their toxins into our water .Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 354 I am writing to ask you to do everything you can to put this to a stop now and to do everything you can to safeguard against the spewing of millions of pounds of toxins into our waters in the future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Russell - Seybert Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3784 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporate d into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water is not only important to me it's very important to the environment, living animals, trees, grass you name it...We have to have clean water to continue to have a healthy ecosystem & healthy drinking water f

or us. If the water is polluted bad it can harm and/or kill alot of living things which is a Very bad thing to happen when it doesn't need to happen. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. F errell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3786 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. As a new parent it is very important to me that my family's drinking water is free from contamination. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 355 Commenter Name: P. Bossert Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3788 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into R esponse: No Comment Excerpt: I demand that the strongest, safest standards be implemented in order to protect our communities and environment. The EPA was not established to cower in the face of industry. We must push forward through the tides of ignoran ce and lies to do what is best for the planet. You know what must be done to protect the environment. Let's do it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Hebblewhite Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3789 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: EPA exists for reasons...America has balance of powe rs written into our Constitution. EPA is a balancer of government power on behalf of citizens against the huge power of massive capital and corporate driven commercial use of natural resources. EPA -- grow ever stronger. Regulate MORE,. not less. It's said that 'wter is the new gold." Well yes. and Nestles and other corporations want to own some and want privatization of water. To sell to us in shops, in plastic bottles, at higher price for nothing at all but convenience we've grown addicted to but do not n eed. EPA, protect all our water, streams, aquifers, etc, from the petro - chemical threats...we cannot live without water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Weber Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3790 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 356 Comment Excerpt: Water is the most vital resource for all life on thi s planet. If we do not protect our water from environmental toxins, we will loose this precious source of life. When that is gone, humans will no longer be able to inhabit this planet. You will not get away with the destruction, or allowance of destruction , of our planet, our homes and our lives. We are watching your every move, so make sure when you cast your decisions they are going help us as a race thrive and grow on a clean planet, able to be healthy bodied and happy because we all have access to fresh , chemical and fluoride free water, that comes from sustainable and well respected sources. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: F. Schuetz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Co ntrol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3791 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams f rom toxic power plant wastewater. We cannot afford its cost to our health and well - being, and the power companies can afford the cost of implementing corrective measures. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Neal Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3792 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 357 Though power plants are the biggest industrial water polluters, they are also the industry with the weakest water pollution standards. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It’s time to end this reckless practice. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Str ong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. This is just one of the sources of pollution that is poisoning our water and air, but it's an importa nt one to reduce. The mandate to do something falls to the EPA. Please do the right thing. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Fedoroff Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Co ntrol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3793 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: To Whom It May Concern at the EPA: Water is one of the top resources any countr y has. Many scientists believe as the population continues to grow it will become an even greater asset over time. Please be vigilant in safeguarding the water supply in the USA. Please do WHATEVER it takes to keep this natural resource protected from all forms of toxic waste not only for this generation but for all generations to come. You are the ones who can make the difference. We know you can do it. Our nation's health, strength and future are dependent upon it. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Selvaggio Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3795 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Ex ternal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 358 Comment Excerpt: As a water resource biologist, I understand that while there may be no obvious body count to drive action on water pollution issues, none the less, pollution does have relation ships to health and safety issues. Therefore, I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. Surface water is the source of drinking water for millions of people. Water treatment processes do not remove all these toxins, nor tox ins from other sources, nor the new toxins formed within the chemical mixes created from these discharges. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution, as well as other sources of pollution, will improve the health of rivers and streams, maki ng the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Thank you for considering societal long term issues along with short term economic issues. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Smith Comme nter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3796 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong r ule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Currently, we can only safely eat 1 fish per year out of our local river. We should be able to eat as many as we want, with the soaring costs of food these days. Comment Respon se: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Lam Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3797 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 359 Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. All the water will effect rain and underwater, and they are our life supply. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Kottmeier Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3799 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Fla g: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Help us create a safe and healthy future for the genera tions behind us. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Chumley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3800 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Pure water is essential to life, and clean water should be the highest priority. Power plants should not be allowed to pollute water to satisfy their own short - term gains. Civilization survived for millennia without centralized power technology. It cannot withstand being poisoned by this toxic waste technology. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 360 Comment er Name: K. Kay Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3801 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. If the CEO's of these corporation think they are immune to the pollution they create, you need to think again. What goes around, comes around. Comment Res ponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Fairmont Yinger Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3802 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I understand that the new EPA rules will help put a stop to water pollution, at a (cost) of two cents per day. I personally will support this proposal by pledging to cover th e first year, an amount of $7.30. Make my pledge a reality! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Knowlton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3803 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 361 I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater and hot water discharges. Evert year, the hot water impacts fish and other wildlife. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: V. Burns Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Do cument Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3804 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It is not unreasonable to expect power plants to reduce the amount of pollution they dump into surface waters each year. We the public, strongly support the EPA's efforts to protect the environment. Keep up the go od work, and keep trying hard when it comes to power plant wastewater! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Islam Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3805 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I urge president Obama to take initiative to end pollution of our rivers. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 362 Commenter Name: M. J. Chaffee Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Documen t Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3806 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and strea ms from toxic power plant wastewater. And what about chastising Japan for the nuclear waste being dumped in the Pacific Ocean since their melt down last year? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Na me: M. McIntyre Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3807 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. In the 1930s, I grew up next to a creek that a chemical company upstream regularly dumped their waste - a s far as I know they still do. We really don't need this to preserve life on our planet. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Williams Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Cont rol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3808 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 363 Comment Excerpt: Please remember our future generations - it is our responsibility to do our best for them. Water is essential to life, and we must practice good citizenship and protect that which gives so much to us. Little is asked for in return. Thank you. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Kemph Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3809 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Exter nal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. If individuals did what the power plants are doing they would probably be put in prison! EPA is supposed to protect the environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Sturm Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Cont rol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3810 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 364 I had no idea that this contamination was still going on except through 'accidental' leakages; this cannot be tolerated. Please stick to your guns - no pollution from anyone! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - O W - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. L. Grant Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3811 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporate d into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We need to do this for the sake of our children and grandchildren and future generations. Comment Respon se: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Marowitz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3812 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I don't want to drink coal - fired power plant effluent just because the EPA forgot what the "P" stood for. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Aller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3813 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 365 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Have you heard of the book "Toms River" ? Get it. READ IT. This shouldn't even warrant any discussion! Our water needs to st ay clean and free from chemicals. It's just common sense. Would YOU want to drink polluted water? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Miller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docume nt Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3814 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. If we do not make stronger standards of what is allowed to go into our rivers, will my water filter remove their industrial waste? If it goes into our water or ground water , I think we end up drinking or ingesting it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. J. Pennington Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3815 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the wat er we drink and the fish we eat safer. Power plants should be subject to the same controls as everyone else.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 366 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Williams Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3816 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution wi ll improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Please think of our planet and the other creatures that we share the earth with. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numb er 1. Commenter Name: E. Cohen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3818 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is much less expensive to stop pollution now than to pay for the cleanup and health costs later. Please protect our and our children's future. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plan t wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Hamann Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3820 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 367 Comment Excerpt: I should not have to urge EPA to stick with a rule with enough teeth to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It is the ver y job of EPA. Every year, power plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It’s past time to end this horrible pollution. We only have one planet, and you have the authority to preserve it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Gordon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3821 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. There truly is no time waste in increasing the EPA's ability to curb pollutio n - unnecessary pollution! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Brower Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3822 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge EPA to implement strong limits on the amount of pollution that power plants are allowed to discharge into our rivers, lakes, a nd other bodies of water that are vital to ecosystems and our quality of life.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 368 Power plant wastewater can contain substances that are nothing less than poison to the plants and animals with which they come in contact. Power utilities should be compelled to use every means possible in order to protect the people they serve and the environment from these harmful discharges. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Pearson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3825 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I do not understand why the EPA is not working fervently with strict, strong standards to protect our precious resources and our citizens. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Jerry K. (no surname provided) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3826 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Keeping our water clean is a no - brainer. We need it to live ! I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Maul Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3827 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 369 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Recently I have been hearing more and more about the lack o f Environmental Protection that has been afforded myself and my fellow Americans partially due to the lack of quality performance by your agency. This has been compounded by the upsetting fact that the oil and gas industry is hell bent on practicing whatev er industrial practice they want - no matter how harmful - any way and anywhere they want. This is something I have been witnessing myself with greater and greater frequency, and a lot of Coloradoans are noticing the shift as well (Its really difficult not to out here). I urge the EPA to step up and take back the power (so to speak) and initialize legitimate practices of environmental protection - because people are scared and angry - and I'm sure the EPA doesn't want to be the target of the fear and anger of the citizens of the great United States. Step up and do the job you've been tasked with. STEP UP and CRACK DOWN ON THE PRACTICES OF POWER PLANTS, THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY AND OTHERS WHO DO NOT HOLD DEAR THE ENVIRONMENT AS EVERY CITIZEN SHOULD!!!! CRACK DOWN ON THE CORRUPTION NOW BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE. There is a lot the EPA can do, and according to a myriad of media sources, the EPA is FAILING MISERABLY at the the most prominent and important aspect of being a Federal Environmental Protection entity: the EPA has failed to protect the environment. Get your asses in gear! We have more to lose if we don't act than if we don't take kickbacks from lobbyists and submit to the pressure from those with the financial power to quite the truth. DO WHAT IS RIGHT, DO I T NOW! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Smith Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3828 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review F lag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 370 Please consider my request that the EPA finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Do what is right for the pe ople, not corporations! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. and J. Bradshaw Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3829 - A1 Comment Excerpt N umber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater,and to protect the oceans t hese flow into. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Jellenik Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3830 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution that they create. Every year, these plant s dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters, threatening the health of those who rely on that water. It’s time to end this reckless practice. This is a common sense step toward stemming pollution that affects us all . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 371 Commenter Name: J. Pesce Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3831 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA should finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Isn't that what you, the EPA, represent? Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams...What follows??? A healthier earth, and healthier people and animals. It's just common sense. Do you all agree? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. M. Olson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3832 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into R esponse: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. With the western part of the US in drought water is scarcely a commodity that can be dismissed as unimportant. P lease help to insure that the generations to come will have water that is clean and drinkable. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Pekarek Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3833 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 372 Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and stream s from toxic power plant wastewater. It is unacceptable that we continue to pollute our water to the point where we are advised to not eat more than a few fish from our Minnesota lakes. This is NOT sustainable. The pollution needs to stop. Comment Response : See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Leftwich Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3834 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Rev iew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I live in Pittsburgh, and western Pennsylvania is blessed with abundant water resources. We must protect them so that the integrity of this valuable asset Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Jackson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Num ber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3835 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The most important element on our earth, necessary for our survival is water. We now know the Fukishima nuclear plant has poisoned most of the Pacific Ocean. We cannot afford any more pollution. Please, please clean up toxic waste without polluting our water supply so our children will have clean water to drink. Thank you.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 373 Comment Response : See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Splitt Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3836 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Revie w External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support the strongest option proposed before the EPA, that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for scrubb er sludge waste. This option would reduce pollution by over 5 billion pounds per year, while the least stringent option, which 80% of plants are already in compliance, would merely reduce pollutants by less than half a billion pounds. Since the ELG has not been updated since 1982, the most stringent options for effluent limitation are needed to bring the best available technology to coal - fired power plants and the cleanest water to our taps. Existing technology can achieve these goals while creating new job s. I encourage the EPA to create these necessary standards for our health water, our communities and our environment. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Nam e: A. Splitt Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3836 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's time to s top the barbaric practice of dumping toxic waste into rivers and streams. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 374 Commenter Name: A. Lusby - Denham Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3837 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge the EPA to issue strong standards that will keep billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium from toxic power plant wastewater out of our rivers, lakes and streams. I was shocked to learn that 4 out of 5 coal plants have no restrictions placed on them regarding the toxic metals that are dumped. This is something I do not understand. We know that the water resources of our planet are limited, and that clean water is necessary for life. What kind of legacy are we leaving both for present generations and those to come? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - O W - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Frizzelle Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3838 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. If not the EPA, than who can we rely on to protect our most valuable and ever decreasing reso urce? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Bish Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3839 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 375 External Review Fla g: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Please don't give power plants the choice to "opt - out" on reducing pollution! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Birch Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3840 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge the EPA to issue strong standards that will keep billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium from toxic power plan t wastewater out of our rivers, lakes and streams. We have only one environment and pollution travels around the world and it is our responsibility to be good stewards. The most important element for human life is clean water, or which there is a finite am ount. The second most vital element is clean air which we need to protect for our health and the health of the planet. We have alternatives to coal for energy. There are no alternatives to clean water and air. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Free Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3841 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated i nto Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 376 Where is the common sense? I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I hope you will promote change and make a difference. Comment Response: See res ponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Kimball Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3842 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Externa l Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please pass strong Effluent Limitation (G)uidelines. Coal plants are adding so many millions of pollutents to our environment and helping global warming come even sooner. We must stop them. I want my grandson to have safe world to grow up in. There are modern ways to help with these problems. Please make strong rules for coal and other industry to keep these dangerous pollutents out of our air and waterways. Don't let the coal companies and the cli mate deniers wear you down....or congress either. We need you to act forcefully and NOW coal - fired power plants and the cleanest water to our taps. Existing technology can achieve these goals while creating new jobs. I encourage the EPA to create these nec essary standards for our health, water, our communities and our environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Sanborn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3843 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. As a trout fisherman, I want to know that the fish I eat are not contaminated. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 377 Commenter Name: J. Botta Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Documen t Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3844 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I believe that we MUST protect our future generations from the tragic probl ems that come from polluted waterways. We must take responsibilities to protect our Great Lakes. I drink this water at my workplace every single day. I LOVE to swim in Lake Michigan, and I eat fish as part of a healthy diet. We must take action! Comment Re sponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Dallas Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3845 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Every year I hear about some town in Massachusetts that h as to bring in water for a while - a month in some cases - because of pollution of one kind or another. Our water should be kept as safe as possible. It took so long to clean up our Charles River, which was a dumping ground for all types of chemicals, some of which can only be removed by digging up certain areas of the river, and I don't know if even that's possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. LaPorte Commenter Affiliation: Priva te Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3846 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 378 Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our river s, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Protect young children and infants who are our most vulnerable citizens from unsafe toxins in our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Redpath Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3847 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We urge the EPA to issue strong standards that will keep billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium from toxic power plant wastewater out of our rivers, lakes and streams. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numb er 1. Commenter Name: C. and K. Gencarelli Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3848 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No C omment Excerpt: Don't give in to government and industry pressure by giving an option to power plants, because they will do what's more cost effective, which is to keep dumping and polluting our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Towne Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 379 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3849 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into R esponse: No Comment Excerpt: I believe that it is very important for EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our sources of water from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. I understand that these plants dump billions of pounds of chemicals, metals and other toxic substances into surface waters. I do understand that they are in the business of providing power so we can light and heat our homes and indus tries but they should not be allowed to do this at the detriment of the quality and safety of our drinking water. How can we allow them to poison our water when they have the technology to do their work in a cleaner, more responsible way? I understand and am willing to pay a little more for the power I use if it means our water will be cleaner and safer. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution are needed to improve, and maintain, the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. K. McCann Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3850 - A1 Comment Excerpt Num ber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water should be our legacy to future generations. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Anonymous Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3853 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 380 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I want to express my strong support for the following requirements regarding power plant effluents: 1. that power plants "dry handle" waste from fly and bottom ash ponds 2. that evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste be used In general, power plants should be required to limit water pollution using the best available means. Opponents will complain about the cost, but the pollution itself has significant costs which have been hidden from the public to date. Power providers, and we the consumers, should pay the true cost of our power production including the cost of the resulting pollution. It is far better to prevent the pollution from happeni ng in the first place than either dealing with the consequences of the pollution on our health and on the environment, or the far more significant costs of cleanup attempts. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Anonymous Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3854 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporate d into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is working on standards that will limit the amount of toxic metals that are recklessly dumped into our waterways from dirty power plants. Please support the EPA strictest limi tations! Four out of five coal plants have no discharge limits and, currently, billions of pounds of toxic metals are dumped into U.S. waterways annually.* Earlier this year, the EPA proposed power plant water pollution standards to begin addressing this p roblem. These standards, known as Effluent Limitation Guidelines, could prevent as little as 470 million or up to 5.3 billion pounds of toxic metals from being released each year.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 381 Clean water is a basic human right and we must support the EPA's efforts to drastically reduce the amount of toxins that coal and other electricity corporations are flushing into our water without repercussion. The comment period is now open and it is critical that we strongly voice our need for safe water. By sending your comment s, we are working together to urge the EPA to enforce strict limits on the pollution entering our water supply. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Lee Commenter Affiliation: Private Cit izen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3855 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support the proposed option that would require power plants to " dry handle" waste from fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for Flue - Gas Desulfurization scrubber sludge waste. Consequently, our individual health could be improved by these standards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Teel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3856 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge the EPA to issue strong standards that will keep billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium from toxic power plant wastewater out of our rivers, lakes and streams. None of these items sho uld leave the site from which they are taken. It is time to make coal companies clean up their own mess and not dump it on the poor near the places it is mined or burned. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 382 Commenter Name: D. Wagner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3857 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge the EPA to issue strong standards that will keep billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium from toxic power plant wastewater out of our rivers, lakes and streams. Coal is by its nature dirty, and associated with toxic el ements. The best possible course, obviously, is to eliminate coal entirely and convert to clean renewable energies. "Washing" coal leaves a slurry pond of toxic tailings behind unstable earthen berms, and possibly without a pond liner. Ash from coal - fired plants contaminates downwind soils, air, crops, animals and people with toxic elements and causes asthma, among others. If there were such a thing as "clean coal", there would still be the toxic waste accumulated in making it "clean". The coal industry makes tremendous profits as it permanently despoils landscapes and poisons us. It is not right that the industry should dump its toxic waste into waterways, where water treatment facilities have to spend their own money to clean it up (and of course, then there is still the question of disposing of the materials). Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Ritzman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 08 19 - 3858 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater . For a few cents a day we can protect our human, animal and plant life from the poisons being put into our environment by coal plants. Is this not common sense - that is not very common when companies and politicians are greedy and irresponsible for so ma ny years to not enforce laws that save lives and the fear of early death from polluted waters.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 383 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Surunga Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3860 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge the EPA to issue strong standards that will keep billio ns of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium from toxic power plant wastewater out of our rivers, lakes and streams. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Cocks Commenter Affiliation : Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3861 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to prote ct our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. This is a no - brainer. Please do what is right and resist any "influence" from various power companies to sway the EPA away from making these long overdue changes. Many would argue that cle aner, healthier drinking water will improve our population's physical and mental health, which will benefit the country in very measurable ways, including its GDP! Please do not let this shameful contamination continue, we are counting on you to stand up t o these stubborn and shameless companies! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Trout Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 384 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3862 - A1 Comment E xcerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to make the right choice for our health and finalize the strongest possible rule to limit power plant wastewater. Fo r more than 30 years, power plants have been able to dump billions of pounds of toxic chemicals into our water annually with few if any limits. This reckless practice is unacceptable and must end. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. McGarrity Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3863 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Resp onse: No Comment Excerpt: We have waited too long to attend to the water pollution caused by power plants. Knowing what we know now about the effects of this pollution on public health, we can't wait any longer. Some may complain, but they will adjust. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. May Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3864 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No E xternal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 385 Strong standards, enforced, will give us a chance for a de cent global future. Clean water is vital to that future. Do your part, EPA -- be the protectors of the people; the pollutersneed no more enablers. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. L. B ates Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3866 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to final ize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We owe this to our children and our grandchildren, and to future generations of all species. Thank you for taking them into consideration. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Marion Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3868 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Exter nal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 386 Commenter Name: J. Hiebert Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3870 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Considering the fundamental necessity of drinking water for all life and challenges we may face as the climate changes (affecting population movemen t as well as local/regional water supplies), we need to make water conservation and cleanup a priority -- and power plant emissions subservient to it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Es opi Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3871 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please continue to prevent water pollution caused by power plants. Clean water is totally worth it! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Curry Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3872 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 387 We shouldn't be beholden - ed to power plants. Stand up to their powerful influence. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Mackenzie Commenter Affiliation: Private C itizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3873 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please, please finalize strong rules to protect our rivers, l akes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Pollock Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3875 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Wh at else is the EPA for anyhow? 1982 is a long way back! Update these limits on toxic water pollution from power plants, NOW! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. A. Deck Commenter Affiliat ion: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3876 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 388 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is time for the EPA to announce stronger ru les for the handling and ultimate disposal of toxic power plant wastewater into surface waters. Let's implement the best modern techniques on behalf of all our citizens and residents. There is an option for power plants to "dry handle" waste from fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. I urge you to mandate this technique. Stronger standards to limit power plant water discharges will improve the water quality of rivers and streams so we can confidently drin k surface water and eat freshwater fish, instead of buying bottled water for work hours and filtering tap water at home. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Quinlan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3878 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protec t our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We steadily find new and more destructive ways to pollute our environment but never seem to really implement better ways to stop pollution. It is time to take a firm stand and do all we can today to stop dumping toxic waste into our surface water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. White Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3880 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 389 Comment Excerpt: Do I really have to explain why clean water is important?? NO I DON'T. ITS COMMON SENSE, IT DOESNT NEED TO BE EXPLAINED ... however until we have politicians. corporations. and citizens that care more about the environment around them pollution will continue ... we not only need laws in place that protect our earth and its inhab itants (ALL INHABITANTS TWO LEGS OR FOUR!!! ), but we need laws that are enforced and not pushed aside when whatever president takes office and is paid by lobbyists to make those laws go away ... we need to start being responsible and do right thing. Comme nt Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Clough Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3881 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Ext ernal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have many reasons to be concerned about coal - generated power. This is the most recent one to come to light. I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lak es and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Scott Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3882 - A1 C omment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. There is n o reason why this particular industry should be exempt from the same stringent Clean Water Act discharge requirements as most others. The resulting pollution impacts water quality and health for millions of Americans. This is far too high a price to pay.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 390 C omment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Yang Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3883 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No E xternal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Environmental protection agency, We are always talking about what is the human purpose, especially for our planet earth. Since we destroy and corrupt everything we see or touc h, every beautiful thing about this world as far as I've seen and learned but we haven't learned from our mistakes. I'm not just speaking as an activist but as a protector of my environment. This problem and all these problems belong to humans and we need to make this our purpose, our reason for existence. Yes, it may take billions of dollars and billions of people but why not lead the example to people all over the world. we set standards and regulation for great reasons. We enforce laws to citizens of thi s world to abide by them, for example people with criminal background but we can't even enforce criminals of the earth? Clearly there is something wrong here, it unusual which makes it corrupt and unforgettable. But it is not unforgivable yet, lets take ca re of this by educating others and by standing together, we can make a difference. We teach our children to stand together all time, why haven't we stand together yet? Are walking contradictions? I'm counting on you everyday the same way you count on me to do my job right. Please help. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Epperson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3884 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge the EPA to instigate the strongest limits on industry water pollution as possible. I believe that the 'economic' right to pollute does not supercede a citizen's right for a natural, healthy world. Thank you,Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 391 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. McGlone Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3885 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With all that is known about pollution from power plants, I'm surprised we are still having to deal with this. But, please add my voice strongly urging you to finalize a strong, no two ways about it, rule that actually does protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. This reckless practice should never have bee n allowed in the first place, and it’s way past time to end it once and for all. Thank you in advance for taking every possible step to achieve this. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. M agruder Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3886 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams which, in turn, will make all of us healthier. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Glennon Commenter Af

filiation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3887 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 392 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We are overdue for the needed environmental protections that ensure the health, continuation, and viability of our planet and of us, the peoples, who inhabit it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. S. Myers Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3890 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Revi ew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste - water. I live in a beautiful Western Michigan community with a harbor on Lake Michigan. Everyday I can see the effects of pollution coming directly into the lake from the polluted Grand River which carries contaminants from Grand Rapids and other cities on its route. We also have a power plant on the harbor/river. People that fish o n the river are hesitant to eat the fish now; and few go in the water of the river. Our fresh water supply is crucial to our survival and our responsibility to be caring stewards of our treasured natural resources. Comment Response: See response to DCN EP A - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Cherry Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3891 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 393 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpo rated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Let's follow the Great Law of the Iroquois Confederacy and consider the impact of our decisions on the next seven generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Gladfelter Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3892 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Wenocur Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3893 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Doesn't this seem obvious? In the long run water pollution from power generation takes a greater toll than the extra cost of handling pollutants better!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 394 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Graham Comm enter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3894 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a str ong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I must eat fish versus meat for health reasons. We need to do everything possible to keep our waters clean so we have safe fish to eat! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Cargill Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3895 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Our water is one of the most precious and fundamental of our natural resources and must be sa feguarded for the greatest good! It is essential that power plants be required to use the best available technology to reduce the amount of pollution they disburse. They have for too long abused their rights and harmed citizens of the US by dumping toxins into our environment, and left it to others to pay the cost. This abuse must stop! Strong standards are imperative to limit all power plant water pollution, thereby improving the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat s afer. I urge you to act in the best interest of the health of all U.S. citizens by creating the strongest standards possible!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 395 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Smith Commenter Affiliati on: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3896 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants are dumping billions of gallons of toxic pollution into our water every year. If you take only one action for clean water this summer, this should be the one. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) needs to hear from you immediately about toxic dumping into our rivers, lakes and streams

– billions of pounds per year

– by hundreds of power plants across the U.S. The power plant industry and other polluters who want to maintain the status quo are doing everything they can to make sure that EPA chooses the weakest, do - nothing rule available . The toxic pollution from power plants can cause everything from cancer to lower IQs in children. It can also affect fish and other wildlife. Limits on this dumping are more than thirty years overdue and only EPA can make that happen. Send a message tod ay! In July, Clean Water Action and allies released a report showing that preventing this water pollution is possible and affordable. the groups' representatives explained how political interference is standing in the way of doing what the Clean Water Act requires. You can read more about Closing the Floodgates: How the Coal Industry is Poisoning Our Water and How We Can Stop It here, http://cleanwateraction.org/publication/closing - floodgates. Here’s some of what their President Bob Wendelgass shared with r eporters. This is vital for all of us to hear: It’s long past time for action and there is no excuse for this pollution to continue. Treatment exists, it’s affordable, and the rest of us can’t afford to pay the price for this continued pollution. The botto m line: It’s time for power plants to stop using our rivers, lakes and streams as open sewers to dump their waste." Make sure your voice is heard. Join me and tell EPA to protect our water and our health by ending the “free pass to pollute” that power plan ts have gotten for the past thirty years Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 396 Commenter Name: E. Shenk Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3897 - A1 Comment Ex cerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please don't let the powerful polluters weaken your proposed guidelines! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: F. Brown Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3899 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. If we are not moving forward on this then what are we committed to? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. LaClair Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3900 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 397 It will also help those who make a living from our waters, and protect their harvest for the future. We must make the responsible choice. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Temmink Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3902 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Let's be clear. Coal is going to continue to be a big part of our energy future. But there is no reason the coal industry whould be handled with kid gloves. We do have cleaner options. Further, every rule regulating control of toxics has created a market for those "toxics' to be used appropriately. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numbe r 1. Commenter Name: Melaine (no surname provided) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3904 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respon se: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It is vital that we keep our waters clean and safe for current and future generations. Comment Response: See respons e to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Simon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3905 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 398 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Revi ew Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water is our most important resource for our survival and health. Everything possible should be done to protect our water and keep it from such dangerous pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Howard Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3906 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a parent and as a citizen of a community that uses well water for drinking, I am very much opposed to the business - as - usual approach to handling wastewater runoff. We need to act now to reduce the se dangers for this and all future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Hickman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3907 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We the undersigned, urge the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to adopt the strongest possible protections on toxic co al ash and power plant water pollution. The best option proposed by the EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters e ntirely. The EPA, however, is currently proposing to choose a weaker option that includes less stringent standards and would fall short of what the Clean Water Act requires. OnlyEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 399 by enacting the toughest standards proposed will the EPA fulfill its duty to protect our environment and public health from toxic coal ash pollution. Studies have found that high levels of toxic contaminants were found in lakes and rivers located downstream from coal ash ponds across North Carolina. It's time the EPA created strong er federal protections for coal ash. We urge you to enforce the strongest possible standards on toxic coal ash pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Hickman Commenter Affiliation : Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3907 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: THE WATER IN BRUNSWICK COUNTY IS SO TOXIC THAT TH E RESIDENCE ARE HAVING TO REPLACE ALL THE RUBBER IN THE TANKS OF THEIR COMODES. CAN YOU IMAGINE WHAT IT IS DOING TO THER STOMACH AN INTESTINES OF THE PEOPLE THAT DRINK IT EVERY DAY?? IT IS CLEAR = THE EPA MUST SET HIGHER STANDARD TO REDUCE THE LEVEL OF COA L ASH THAT IS DISCHARGED INTO OUR RIVERS AND STREAMS. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Connor - McKee Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 3911 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a resident of North Carolina,I am sick (literally) and tired of Duke Power being allowed to pollute my air an d water with their toxic waste.Coal is a very dirty fossil fuel,and I hope that North Carolina will soon convert to only Green Energy sources.I have COPD, and my doctors tell me that that is a result of coal dust in the air I breathe.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 400 Comment Response: Se e response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Paulsen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3913 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ex ternal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: North Carolina is far to beautiful to release toxic waste from burnt Coal. It kind of stupid this should even be a problem, given that we resolved long ago to stop pollution in our waterways a nd into the ground water table. These people should be ashamed they ruin land and destroy lives mining the coal and then when its being burned the destroy more lives and land not properly disposing of the toxic by products. Shame on the the EPA need to sta rt doing their job without being asked and just close these companies if they aren't going to listen, fine them so much you bankrupt them. This will effect people for 100's of years long after all of us are dead and gone!!!! Stop them Now Period, who cares what they are lobbying for. HOW STUPID TO EVEN ATTEMPT TO LISTEN TO SOMEONE SAYING PLEASE LET US DESTROY AMERICA BECAUSE WE HAVE MADE BILLIONS DOING IT AND WE WANT TO TELL YOU WHAT TO DO. TO HELL WITH THEM, IMPRISON THEM IF NEED BE AND BANKRUPT THE PEOPLE DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY, THEIR KIDS AREN'T EXPOSED TO IT, THEY ARE TO SMART TO EVER LET THAT HAPPEN, THAT ALONE EMPOWERS MY POINT!!!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Bromley Commente r Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3915 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I live in North Carolina, and I love to do a lot of outdoor activities. I also love the wildlife around here. Toxic elements in the water systems are harmful to everything and everyone. I think the EPA should regulate how these coal companies get rid of th eir waste. If it's not regulated, there won't be the same wildlife for the next generation, that we have now. North Carolina is a state that is perfect for the lovers of the outdoors, lets keep it that way!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 401 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Schmerling Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3916 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Energy from coal is only "cheap" because the public pays the costs of human beings dying from poisons from the entire cycle of coal. Our health, and the health of our children , are far more important than criminal billionaires making even more money, and corrupting our democratic system. Your job is to protect all of us from these creeps. We have your back! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Briggs Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3919 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It seems prudent for EPA to adopt a rule that will allow for standards that limit heavy metals - in particular, lead, mercury, arsenic, and selenium commonly present in fly ash - so that human and wildlife health is safeguarded. My opinion on this issue is shaped by having tw o small children who I hope will have clean waterways to sustain them in the future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Tran script Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 402 Comment Excerpt: More stringent national standards to protect people in our w aters is long overdue, and I know I speak for many people in North Carolina who cannot be here today but whose waters are impacted by coal plant wastewater effluent. This effluent, whether pretreated or discharged, needs to be treated to remove all toxins before discharge. These include metals like arsenic, selenium, mercury, and lead, and exposure can lead to birth defects, cancer, and even death. We urge you to adopt zero discharge standards, and the majority of power plants don't use public water treat ment facilities. That's included in North Carolina, so it makes it critically important for EPA to adopt rules that will require all coal burning plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to safer coal ash handling. Our nation must ad opt the strongest standards in order to protect people whose waters are receiving streams for the effluent. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 4 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Industry has succeeded in setting out some weaker options, getting those on the table, and I urge you to select the most protective options and not let those who pollute make their profit at the expense of our health and our clean waters. Industry shoul d not be allowed to continue to have an environmental mess that future generations will need to clean up. These are long overdue standards, and we urge you to adopt new stringent rules as soon as possible, adopt rules that will save lives, protect children from getting sick, and bring us closer to the promise of the Clean Water Act of fishable, swimmable, and drinkable waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Com menter Affiliation: Public Hearing TranscriptEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 403 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 5 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: An updating of these rules is long overdue. The current rules have not been updated since 1982 and do almost nothing to address discharges of toxic metals from power plants, such as arsenic, mercury, selenium, and lead that are doing massive harm. As EPA itself has recognized , power plant pollution is a threat to human life, aquatic life, and wildlife, and ongoing pollution from power plants is a major impediment to cleaning up waterways that are already polluted. This is a growing problem. As power plants all over the countr y are installing new air pollution controls to meet EPA's much needed health based air quality standards, a substantial portion of the harmful pollution that formerly was admitted into the air is now being discharged into our waters. Power plants that ins tall air pollution controls have exponentially greater levels of toxic pollutants in their wastewater. If the EPA doesn't finalize a strong rule that requires power plants to address all of their toxic pollutants, then it will be trading one set of public health and environmental problems for another. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 9 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: EPA has proposed several options that vary significantly in the amount of power plant wastewat er pollution that would be controlled. For example, the weakest preferred option would only control 468 million pounds of pollution, while the most stringent option, though not preferred by EPA, would control 5.3 billion pounds of pollution. It is our und erstanding that the pretreatment standards that EPA has proposed are essentially identical to the standards proposed for plants discharging directly into streams, lakes, rivers, and other water. Both sets of standards need to be as stringent as possible, meaning that they should require power plants to treat all of their toxic wastewater, not just some of it. Comment Response:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 404 See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 13 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Technology exists to effectively eliminate nearly all water pollution from power plants, and it is time to end the power plant industry's unlimited permit to pollute, which stands in the way of cleaning up our rivers, streams, and lakes. Comment Respons e: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 14 External Re view Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am here today to speak in support of EPA's most stringent options for limitations on effluents for the steam electric sector, specifically Option 4 and, most preferred, Option 5. Since the ELG has not been updated since 1982, the most stringent options for effluent limitation are preferred to bring the regulations up to date with the best available technology. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 20Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 405 External Review Flag: No External Review Exte rnal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Wise Energy Coalition applauds the EPA for taking these common sense steps to limit toxic wastewater discharges from power plant effluent. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 21 External Review Flag: No External Review Extern al Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I understand that the pretreatment standards which EPA has proposed are basically identical to the proposal for plants discharging right to our waterways. Both sets of standards need to be as str ingent as possible. EPA should be setting zero discharge standards and requiring rigorous treatment of toxic heavy metals in any remaining waste. Florida represents a perfect example of why the most stringent regulations for power plant water pollution ar e needed. Our water supply is vulnerable. We use a lot of energy. State regulations are weak. Enforcement is rare, and pollution is rampant. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 28 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Florida's precious water supplies are facing serious threat of toxic contamination from our coal fired power plants. The health of our local communities is directly affected by this out of control hazardous waste stream. By alleviating industries of t he responsibility of properly treating toxicEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 406 waste, the government is passing those costs on the public and taxpayers in the form of increased health care cost, pollution cleanup cost, and Florida's future economic livelihood. I would like my future child ren and grandchildren to have the chance to enjoy the pleasures of Florida's natural habitat, but I don't believe that will be possible without cutting back on coal fired power plant water pollution with the most stringent regulations possible. If the tech nology exists to eliminate irreparable damage to our only home, the only question should be, “When can we start?” Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Aff

iliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 39 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: But it does not have to be thi s way. Just like it does with many other industries, the EPA should require these power plants to adopt the best available technology, which already exists and is in use at some plants, to reduce the most amount of pollution. Because what is at stake, ou r water, it is critical to our survival, our health, and our well being. There is no reason for power plants to continue dumping arsenic, lead, selenium, mercury, and many other toxic pollutants into our water. These are the very same toxins that EPA alre ady regulates in other forms. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3 920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 43 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Now more than ever, we as Floridians, we as Americans, we as human beings need to act to safeguard our limited res ources not just for our survival, but for the generations after us who willEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 407 inherit our decisions. EPA can, and therefore should, take this step and implement the most stringent standards possible to bring us closer to safeguarding our waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 44 Exte rnal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In Wisconsin, water based tourism is an 8 to $12 billion annual industry, so clean water is very important to us. Exposure to these dangerous chemicals can lead to birth defects, cancer, and even death. While the EPA has called this hearing specifically on the pretreatment part of the proposed water pollution standards, we feel it's important that you hear from the public on the rule as a whole because s o many of us are affected by coal waste in our local rivers, lakes, and streams. In Milwaukee, we have a power plant called We Energies Valley Power Plant. This is a lovely picture of it. It's one of the oldest coal fired electric power plants in the cou ntry and creates steam and electric for most of downtown Milwaukee. The plant finally received a new wastewater permit just late last year in 2012. Their previous permit had been expired for 20 years, was last issued in 1987, and the Valley's permit, lik e these Proposed Rules that I'm understanding, are also have been expired for 3 years, still allows for antiquated technology that's not really in compliance with new laws, best management practices, or science. These proposed water pollution standards for steam power plants are long overdue, and we feel the standard should be finalized in the strongest form possible to ensure that coal plants eliminate their most toxic discharges and finally use available controlled technology to treat heavy metals. We support EPA in promulgating these standards, and I give you kudos for finally tackling this major source of water pollution. As others have mentioned, we're very concerned that toxic wastewater discharge from power plants is anticipated to actually increa se. I think EPA's own numbers are that the wastewater stream could increase by 28 percent in the next 15 years as more pollutants are scrubbed out of the air and essentially ending up in the water waste stream and discharged into our waterways, either dir ectly or after being filtered through a public treatment facility first. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 408 Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 47 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: So, in conclusion, we hope that EPA will select the strongest efflu ent limitations possible to limit the toxics in our waterways and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish are safe to eat. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. C ommenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 51 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: So the consequences of weak or inadequate regulations have real consequences for real Americans, and the solution has to be really good, stringent, enforceable standards and regulations to protect the public from the known h azards from this coal burning industry. So the latest pretreatment standards that EPA has proposed for wastewater must be stringent because we already know from bitter experience the terrible and unfair consequences for communities of having less stringent rules, of having rules that do not achieve the ends for which they are created, of having rules that ultimately fall short of protecting the health and safety of the general public and most particularly of the communities closest to these toxic generators . How many communities must suffer due to the deferral of strict and stringent and prudent rules necessary to protect the public from these ravages, to curtail the brutal injustices created by these waste streams? Comment Response: See response to DCN E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 409 Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 56 External Review Flag: No External Re view External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The second thing I wanted to tell you is that our waterways need the strongest protections that you all have proposed. We need the zero discharge option. It is completely unacceptable to us that industry was allowed to insert options that will not eliminate heavy metal pollution from our waterways. Those options are completely inappropriate, and the bottom line here is corporations should not be allowed to pollute our waterways for pr ofit. Poisoning people and waterways for profit is not okay. Our country is better than that. We can do better than holes in the ground, and we need to implement the most stringent water pollution technology options you all have listed. Thirdly, our com munities need strong limits, the most stringent limits now. Reagan was President the last time you all proposed rules for coal fired power plants. It's been 30 years that they've been dumping millions of gallons of toxic heavy metals into our waterways. We need you all to get going and get the most stringent option implemented right away, and we need that it is critical because we're adding more scrubbers. They are pulling more arsenic, mercury, lead, NOx, and SOx out of the air, and those are going into our waterways. The bottom line here, and I'm going to conclude by saying, we don't need 5.3 billion gallons or 5.3 billion pounds of toxic heavy metal pollution dumped in our waterways. America is better than that. A hole in the ground is not the be st available technology. We need you all to get with the program and do what's right. The reason that parade of Waterkeepers from all these states came here today, and more are coming up to talk, is because this is critical. It is critical for you all to get this right because our people, the people we love, that we interact every day with in our communities and our families, drink the water from these waterways, they recreate there, they swim, and they fish. They deserve clean water. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 410 Com ment Excerpt Number: 62 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We have, and have had for years, more than affordable technology for a zero discharge standard. The, quote/unquote, treatme nt technology that's been utilized until now, gravity is a 13.8 billion year plus old technology. Pretreatment standards for existing sources, Regulatory Options 4 and 5, and those alone are the adequate options for beginning to utilize modern technology t o put a true halt on a problem that has perpetuated for 30 years longer than it was supposed to. Fall short here and you will increasingly have a problem in waterways and with water and wastewater treatment plant sludge under Part 503. Please stop playin g toxic metal Whac A Mole with public waterways and infrastructures. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 66 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Today, I urge the EPA to adopt and finalize the strongest possible options in the Proposed Effluent Limitation Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Plants. The EPA should finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, streams, and communities from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants should be requir ed to adopt the best available technology, to reduce the most amount of pollution. The technology exists, and it's already in use at some plants. There is no reason for power plants to continue dumping arsenic, leads, selenium, mercury, and other toxic p ollutants into our waters. Here on the Potomac River, just a few miles from Washington, D.C., are two major coal power plants. Over the past few years, Potomac Riverkeeper has been involved in getting these plants to clean up toxic pollution leaching from their unlined coal ash disposal sites. Now these plants have installed flue gas desulfurization scrubbers, and the State of Maryland mandated that they install waste treatment systems to control the discharge of nitrogen.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 411 As you may know, under the Chesa peake Bay TMDL, no new discharges of nutrients are allowed; however, these plants have had a very difficult time keeping their nitrogen discharges within their limits. Throughout this time while we've been trying to enforce the nitrogen limits, we have ask ed the question: What about the toxic metals? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 68 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Now the State of Maryland is drafting new permits for these plants, and again, I ask what about t he toxic metals. The EPA should adopt the strongest possible rule so that people like this firefighter, the people who live and work near the power plants, the people who recreate in the river, and the millions of people who get their drinking water from the river like you do not have to worry and ask what's in the water. Technologies are available that will nearly eliminate water pollution from these power plants. These technologies are cost effective and should be adopted. Comment Response: See respons e to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 71 External Review Flag: No E xternal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: That is why we are here today. We urge EPA to revise the Effluent Limitation Guidelines for power plants and make them as strong as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 412 Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 75 External Revi ew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: So we encourage EPA to conduct regional hearings to take comments on all aspects of power plant waste, so we can learn more about the real impacts of these facili ties in this country, and we hope that EPA will adopt the strongest protections possible to prevent this pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Af

filiation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 77 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Earthjustice is concerned that EPA guidelines limiting toxic effluent inadequately addressed the adverse effects on public health and water from coal fired power plant discharges. EPA must carry out its mandate by ensuring that all communities are adequately protected from harmful effluents. The strictest standards for chemical discharge and the disposal of toxic coal ash are the only regulations that will ensure that obligation is met. Earthjustice urges EPA to implement a zero discharge policy for coal ash impoundments and other wastewaters, so that our waterways remain clean enough to sustain healthy lifestyles. Communities should not be exposed to mercury, lead, arsenic, and other toxic pollutants to any degree in their drinking water. Wastewater should also be subject to eva poration treatment to guarantee that dry waste is disposed of safely in protective landfills. When public health is at risk, partial advocacy is not enough. We need EPA to enact the strongest and most effective measures possible concerning effluent limita tions for steam electric power plants to ensure that our environment is livable. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 413 Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcri pt Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 79 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Earthjustice urges EPA to implement these two policies, ensuring effective regulation of wastewater and solid waste. They are central to preserving the clean environment that all people deserve. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcr ipt Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 83 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With the heal th of children and entire families at stake, EPA must act and put the most stringent national guidelines in place to reduce water pollution from power plants. EPA should be setting a zero discharge standard in requiring rigorous treatment of the heavy met als in any remaining waste. It is critical that EPA stands with American citizens and holds the line against big polluters who apparently have managed to weaken EPA's original proposal already. We cannot allow big polluters who are content to make a profi t on the backs of families and our natural resources to continue to use our waterways as dumping ground for toxic chemicals. And I just wanted to add one more thing, which is that the lady from North Carolina has suggested that we are better than this, thi s country is better than this, and I believe that the hallmark of bad environmental or lacking environmental regulation, that's a characteristic of third world countries, not first world countries that should be a leader in the world to establishing high s tandards on environmental protection, so I am asking you to lead on this issue. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 414 Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcri pt Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 87 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We can do better than this. I think, ultimately, our charge is to avoid the unnecessary misery of communities who must suffer from this systematic negligence who must devote their time to fighting to get what government should be guaranteeing them and what Congress guaranteed in the Clean Water Act. We deeply appreci ate your efforts to move us forward, and we trust that this remaining road will lead us to a good place. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 89 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's also critical for EPA to move swift ly on setting these standards because, as we have started to control the air pollution from power plants, we are now starting to see those same pollutants being caught as scrubber sludge and transferred to our water, so the communities that once had to bre athe these dangerous pollutants will now have to drink them unless the rules change. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 93 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 415 Comment Excerpt: So the NHMA urges EPA to implement guidelines that ensur e the health and safety of our communities and require zero discharge of deadly chemicals into our waterways and evaporation treatment of wastewaters, so that dry waste can be safely disposed in secure landfills. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 95 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Thank you for the opportunity to testify in support of critical safeguards for toxic water pollution from coal plants. While the Environmental Prot ection Agency has called this hearing specifically on the pretreatment part of the proposed water pollution standards, the agency needs to listen more broadly about the serious water pollution caused by coal burning power plants. All across the United Stat es, millions of gallons per day of water pollution laced with toxic pollutants, including heavy metals like arsenic, mercury, selenium, and lead flow from coal fired power plants into our rivers, lakes, and streams. The Clean Water Act was established to d eal with such pollution, but after three decades of inaction, the largest industrial source of toxic water pollution continues to foul our waters. An update is long overdue, and I applaud the EPA for proposing a rule to finally clean up this mess, and whil e there are many options proposed in the rule, I strongly encourage the EPA to finalize the strongest option and move towards zero discharge of these water pollutants. I am invested in this at multiple levels. Professionally, as a cancer biologist, I know exposure to heavy metals, dangerous chemicals, can cause cancer, birth defects, and even death. Personally, I am concerned about health risks for myself, for my family, for friends, from water and food pollution from coal plants. What makes it so egregi ous is that poisoning our waters can be prevented. These long overdue standards, if finalized in their strongest form, will require all coal plants to eliminate their most toxic discharges and use available, existing technology to treat dangerous heavy me tals in their wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 416 Limiting the amount of toxics in our water through common sense standards will save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. My story is just one of millions out th ere on how this pollution is directly affecting our daily lives. No community should have to worry about the safety of its water or the health of its rivers. That is the guarantee that Congress set out in the Clean Water Act, but that promise has long be en deferred. For the sake of the hundreds of thousands of Americans who suffer because of that indefensible delay, it's time now for EPA at least to clean up this toxic industry. Clean water is a basic human right. We all deserve safe water to drink, cle an lakes and rivers to boat and play in, flourishing watersheds, and healthy fish to eat. For too long, the coal industry has polluted our precious waters with impunity. There is no reason to tolerate continued dumping, and the Clean Water Act mandates c leanup. The strongest of EPA's proposed options will get us to that future. EPA has shown that the strongest options will be affordable and the most beneficial to our communities. I ask that you move to finalize the strongest option and move us toward ze ro discharge of pollution. With regards to toxic water from power plants or ELG, the reason we're all here today, I must preface this by saying that I think it's odd, bizarre that we even have to testify to the basic desire to have no toxic anything dumped in our water sources, but for the record, it's my strong position that we should be setting a standard of zero discharge and requiring rigorous treatment of toxic heavy metals in the remaining waste. My position that there should be zero discharge allowed is based on two items. One, speaking on a local level, the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries are already suffering from the effects of pollution and are just starting to make a slow comeback. More importantly, I don't trust coal energy companies to abid e by set guidelines. For example, there's a possible lawsuit against the operator of three coal fired plants in Maryland Chalk Point, Morgantown, and Dickerson for discharging excessive amounts of nutrient pollution from Chesapeake Bay rivers and tr ying to mask their violations by transferring pollution credits among facilities. On a personal note, my husband likes to take the kids fishing, as you can see from well, this isn't a very good picture, but this is a good picture. You know, we like to fish, of course, and it's sad to think that we have to question the fish that we catch. It's sad to think that we aren't comfortable swimming in certain waters. When will we see that by compromising the environment, we only hurt ourselves, and how penny smart and dollar foolish are we in thinking that it's okay to allow some degree of pollution only to have to pay for cleaning it up later, not to mention the health costs associated with sickness due to heavy metal contamination? So, in closing, be strong, and remember that your job is to protect the public and not the power plants.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 417 Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 99 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am not only looking for a place to start my career, but since I am recently engaged, I am also looking for a place to build a home and a family. If my future children are remotely as inclined as I was to spend every warm day swimming and paddling, I will be sure to find a locati on that I know is safe. Locations of coal plants are something that I personally look at when I am making these life decisions, as the health of those I care about are a dependent. I urge the EPA to apply the strictest effluent limitations considered for healthy businesses and healthy families. I hope that this time next year as I take my students paddling, I can tell them about the improvements made in coal plant regulations that are working to improve our waterways and help our fledgling industries grow . And most of all, I hope to be able to expand my search for a home and a place to grow my business unhindered by concerns of heavy metal water pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name : Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 109 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Commen t Excerpt: Coal provides an important energy source and jobs for many Americans; however, coal burning plants also produce dangerous toxins, which may harm the same people who should benefit from the energy produced by these plants.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 418 Because coal released in our local rivers, lakes, and streams affect so many people, today's hearing and public testimony is of special importance. Coal burning plants release millions of pounds of toxic metals into our waterways. These chemicals can lead to serious health pr oblems, including cancer and birth defects, yet nearly four out of five coal plants in the U.S. have no limits on the amount of toxins they are allowed to dump into the water. I live in New Jersey, a state where three active coal power plants operate, but only one of these plants has a permit that limits dumping of toxic metal. This is why the proposed national standards to limit toxins and wastewater from coal burning plants are so important. Strong limits on the amount of toxins in our water will ensure that communities may benefit from energy that sustains them rather than being harmed. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Tr anscript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 111 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: So I want to remind the EPA, the gravity of its proposed legislation

– - regulations, and specify that specifically, their impacts on the health of individuals I met in March, and while I thank the EPA, I want to remind the EPA that there is more to be done. I encourage the agency to be bolder and even more thor ough. EPA should be setting zero discharge standards on all coal plants and require rigorous treatment on toxic heavy metals and any remaining waste. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Pub lic Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 113 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Exce rpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 419 I encourage the EPA to move forward on these additional rules and to do so as quickly as possible. This is because I know that having safe, clean drinking water should not be a privilege. It is a basic human right. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 119 External Review Flag: No Ex ternal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Adopt something resembling the Options 4 or 5 in the rule that you have proposed to effect zero liquid discharge technology, and I'd just encourage you as you're developing thi s to just ask this one question: If not the EPA, then who? Who is going to protect the health and safety of people in North Carolina? I can assure you, it's not the state or the state agencies. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 126 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We also want to include that just recently on June 28th, many community groups, the Sierra Club, Earthjustice, also submitted comments for the cumulative to create cumulative impact standards at E PA to include coal ash, to include all these coal water problems in addition because these communities are so inundated with pollution not just from coal but other sources and refineries and agriculture processes. So we are very happy that EPA is looking a t this and it's a long awaited solution, and for all of us who rely on water, because all of us do, and the ecosystem, these measures will not just reach us but also save us, and all of us particularly in impacted communities. Comment Response: See respon se to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 420 Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 128 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In our coalition's view, these strict standards are best captured in EPA's most stringent proposal that requires dry handling of the toxic waste generated by coal plants, ze ro discharge from coal ash impoundments and landfills, and evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge water. Both rules are essential to protect the health of our members and necessary to guarantee the safety of the air, water, and food of our Hispanic communities nationwide. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Contr ol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 129 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: For over three decades, Americans have been waiting with growing impatience for the U.S. EPA to propose a new rule under the federal Clean Water Act to effectively, thoroughly, and safely treat toxic waste pollution from coal fired power plants. Thus, NHEC is very pleased to be able to provide public comments on these long overdue ac tions regarding the so called "pretreatment standards" of this coal waste. Today, as we all know, coal fired power plants are the largest water polluters in the United States. These facilities generate nearly three quarters of all toxic water pollution, a nd coal waste contains harmful quantities of arsenic, mercury, cadmium, and selenium. All these metals have proven to be -- to have damaging health impacts on people and our public health as well as aquatic life and ecosystems.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 421 Wastewater rules for power plants under the Clean Water Act have not been revised or improved for more than 30 years. Under current regulations, millions of pounds of these heavy metals pollute our waters annually. A significant amount of this pollution, as you have heard today, c ome from effluent from coal ash ponds as well as sludge from air pollution control scrubbers. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public H earing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 131 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: NHEC is here today to speak on behalf of our 7,0 00 members nationwide and the well being of the over 50 million Latinos who are directly impacted by how responsibly and soon EPA carries out its duties to protect our environment. NHEC members fully recognize and support the effective regulation of power plants since many of these facilities are sited in low income and community of colors. With 60 percent of all toxic pollutants and surface water originating from power plant discharges, it is now imperative that EPA take strong swift action to safeguard p ublic and environmental health. Regarding the pretreatment standard for coal waste going to public water treatment facilities as well as the Proposed Rule in general, NHEC has some specific concerns and recommendations. First, we strongly urge EPA to adop t the most stringent possible rule on effluent limitations. By doing so, our nation will see a 2.62 billion pound annual reduction of toxic pollutants. Second, we urge the adoption of a zero discharge requirement from coal ash impoundments by implementing zero liquid discharge technology and conversion to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 422 Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comm ent Excerpt Number: 133 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Fourth, we urge EPA to exercise its undisputed authority under both the Clean Water Act and the Resource Conservation and Re covery Act, RCRA, to ensure that the deadly toxins in coal ash do not pollute our air and water, and by doing so meet the legitimate environmental justice concerns of Latinos and other communities. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. . Comments about the RCRA CCR Rule are outside the scope of this rulemaking. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comm ent Excerpt Number: 135 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA plays a more effective role than physicians in preventing these conditions by implementing stringent Effluent Limita tion Guidelines that can reduce the impacts of harmful pollutants. Stringent guidelines will ensure that harmful substances such as cadmium, lead, mercury, arsenic, selenium, thallium, do not make their way into the water bodies of these community. Commen t Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 137 E xternal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 423 Comment Excerpt: No child or family should have to suffer. I'm deeply and personally concerned that 11 of my local 13 rivers are impaired with heavy metals and radion uclides, and this is according to the EPA's own MyEnvironment analysis for my zip code. So the EPA must require zero discharges of these deadly chemicals into our waterways, mandate evaporation treatment of chemical laden wastewaters, so that dry waste can be safely disposed in secure landfills, and address the threat to health from all toxic waste generated by coal fired power plants by finalizing the coal ash rule that the agency has already proposed. This is not only an important step for environmental protection; it's a public health imperative. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 139 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I hope that the EPA will protect the health of all Americans and adopt the most stringent proposed regulations for steam electric power plants, so that the byproducts of burning coal do not do irreparable damage to Americans or the lakes, rivers, and oceans of this great nation. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt N umber 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 143 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly support the Environmental Protection Agency proposed new coal plant water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped in the water. These water pollution limits finalized in their strongest form could eliminate or greatly reduce toxic dumping in our nation's waterways that limit the amount of toxic metals that is dumped in our waterways.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 424 These standards will also require all coal plants to monitor and report the amount of poll ution dumped into the water, giving us detailed information about the types and amounts of dangerous chemicals in our water. Limiting the amount of toxics in our water will save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure water is safe to drink a nd our fish safe to eat. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 163 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants are by far the largest dischargers of toxic pollution in the U.S., dumping billions of pounds of pollution into our rivers, streams, and lakes each year. First, without strong federal standards, permitting agencies routinely ignore the law and allow power plants to discharge unlimited amounts of toxic pollution. For the past 30 years, EPA has failed to review and revise national discharge standards for coal fired power plants, as required by the Clean Water act. Nearly 70 percent of coal plants that dump coal ash and scrubber wastewater into our waters have no limits on arsenic, boron, cadmium, lead, mercury, and selenium. Only a little over half of these plants are required to monitor and report discharges of this pollution. For the past 30 years, states have effectively allowed coal plants to use our rivers, streams, and lakes as their own private dumping gr ounds. Second, the failure to control toxic pollution from power plants wreaks ecological havoc in our watersheds and puts downstream communities in harm's way. EPA has identified 250 instances where power plants have damaged ground or surface waters with arsenic, selenium, and other heavy metals. Tens of thousands of miles of our rivers have been poisoned, compromising the health of the environment and anyone who fishes and swims in these waters. Third, this is a problem with a solution. The good news i s that EPA has made clear that affordable wastewater treatment technologies are available to clean up these dangerous discharges.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 425 Options 5 and 4 in EPA's Proposed Rule would require the elimination of the majority of coal plant water pollution using techn ologies that are available and cost effective. The coal industry can easily afford these controls. EPA estimates that ending toxic dumping from coal plants would cost less than 1 percent of annual revenue for most coal plant operators and just pennies a d ay for ordinary Americans if the utilities pass some of the cleanup cost to consumers. EPA can no longer ignore the unchecked dumping of billions of pounds of pollution into our waters. Americans deserve, and the Clean Water Act demands, that EPA end deca des of toxic dumping and require the affordable and available treatment technologies proposed in Option 5 to eliminate the majority of these dangerous discharges. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commente r Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 165 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Again, I commend the decision to tighten regulations, but we need to take every step we can to stop any pollutant from entering our drinking supply. So, again, I strongly urge the EPA to set zero discharge standards and aggressive heavy metal treatment standards. We know that lifelong damage and terminal illnesses results from these toxins. Learning several years from now that our measures are insufficient would be like running an inhumane experiment. None of us can opt to not drink wa ter. No one should risk a lifelong illness or slow death in the pursuit of something essential to human life. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Pub lic Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 166Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 426 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Exce rpt: Given these challenges, it's especially important that EPA set zero discharge for heavy metals and other pollutants and require rigorous treatment of heavy metals and any remaining waste. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 169 External Rev iew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Now the State of Maryland is drafting new permits for these plants, and again, I ask what about the toxic metals. The EPA should adopt the strongest possible ru le so that people like this firefighter, the people who live and work near the power plants, the people who recreate in the river, and the millions of people who get their drinking water from the river like you do not have to worry and ask what's in the wa ter. Technologies are available that will nearly eliminate water pollution from these power plants. These technologies are cost effective and should be adopted. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 170 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: On behalf of our over 80,000 members, activists, and volunteers in Maryland and Virginia, we are here today to urge the EPA to finalize the strongest regulatory option for power plantEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 427 wastewater effluent discharges in order to protect th e health of our local waterways and communities. CCAN is submitting comments on behalf of our members that live within 5 miles of many large coal fired power plants in Maryland and Virginia and are negatively impacted by these facilities on a daily basis. EPA has repeatedly acknowledged that the existing effluent guidelines that are over 30 years have not kept pace with developments in the industry and have utterly failed to protect local waterways from the worst pollutants, such as toxic metals that are di scharging from these facilities. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 171 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Among the Waterkeeper Alliance organizations, I have the dubious distinction of having more power plants in my watershed than any other Riverkeeper. The Wabash River forms the border between Indiana and Illinois and is listed as impaired for numerous heavy metals, and its impairments are localized in many cases. Most of our power plants are old and should have bee n retired years ago. They have gone beyond their design life, and most of our power plants have coal ash ponds on site that discharge toxic metals such as arsenic, cadmium, boron, selenium, and they are much more soluble and much more concentrated than th ey are in the coal itself. Today's hearing addresses only a very small subset of power plants because most do not discharge to publicly owned treatment works, so we really want to encourage EPA to adopt rules that would require all power plants to install zero discharge technology and convert to safer coal ash handling systems. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 428 Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affi liation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 172 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am the director of the Beyon d Coal Campaign at the Sierra Club, and on behalf of the Sierra Club and our 2 million members and supporters, I am here today to both offer our support for EPA's proposed Effluent Limitation Guidelines for power plants and to call on the agency to adopt a strong final standard that offers the best possible protection for our health, for the health of our kids, and the health of the streams, rivers, and lakes that we all love and upon which so many of us depend. As a mom who loves to take my little 3 year old daughter swimming, fishing, and boating in the streams and rivers of West Virginia where I live, I know how much is at stake. I have worked personally for over a decade to tackle coal pollution and move America to clean energy, and that work has taken me from the coal fields of Appalachia to the halls of Congress. I thought I had seen it all, but until we ramped up our work on this standard last year, I actually had no idea that coal fired power plants were the number one source of toxic water polluti on in the United States, to the tune of billions of pounds a year of dangerous pollutants, like mercury, lead, and arsenic, and I also had no idea that in most states, this increasingly toxic pollution is being dumped straight into our streams and rivers a nd lakes, essentially without being treated at all, due to sorely outdated national standards that are 31 years old and fail to set any limits on many dangerous pollutants. When I tell my friends, my family, even my coworkers who work closely on these issu es about this, they can't believe it either. I have explained to them that, yes, the Clean Water Act is one of our nation's greatest achievements, and thanks to this historic legislation, our rivers are no longer catching on fire, and our waterways are sa fer and healthier than they were decades ago. But 40 years after the act was passed, the coal industry is still polluting with impunity thanks to a loophole no other industry has enjoyed. That is about to change, and how much it will change, now depends o n you. The Sierra Club is calling on the EPA to adopt a standard that adequately protects public health and our waterways. That means a standard that requires a dry handling of coal ash, moving away from settling ponds that do essentially nothing to treat the waste, and using best water treatment technologies for scrubber sludge and leachate. These are labeled Options 4 and 5 in the Proposed Rule. As you know, we have technologies available today in use at some coal plants, as a matter of fact, that can t reat this pollution at a modest cost. EPA has every reason to adopt a strongEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 429 standard, but I understand you are under great pressure to adopt a weaker and inadequate standard. This is no surprise. As President Obama noted in his climate speech last month , this is the boilerplate reaction of polluters anytime improved health and safety protections are proposed. As the President also noted, these gloom and doom scenarios never come to pass. Industry adapts and evolves, and we all enjoy cleaner air and wat er. I implore you to stand firm and adopt a robust standard that will really protect our water and our kids. After all, it might be quite a long time before we get another chance. I want to close by noting that the many people who spoke before me have tr aveled from across the nation making very long trips to this hearing today because their health and the health of their families is threatened by what is a completely solvable problem. You now have the solution within your grasp, the opportunity to clean up the majority of our nation's toxic water pollution, save lives, prevent our kids from getting sick, and make sure our water is safe to drink and our fish are safe to eat, but the weaker options EPA has proposed won't do the job. We need the EPA to fina lize strong Effluent Limitation Guidelines for power plants, Options 4 and 5, in the Proposed Rule. Our kids are counting on you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcri pt Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 173 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am delighte d to be here and hear the strong, clear, impassioned advocacy for strong Effluent Limitation Guidelines to clean up toxic wastewater pollution from power plants. Put very simply, water is one of our nation's most precious resources. Coal fired power plant s are the number one source of toxic water pollution discharged into our lakes and rivers and streams. With the advent of stronger air pollution controls, much of the dangerous toxic metals and other poisons that were previously released into the air we b reathe are now being controlled and captured, but what has been a win for our air has created new problems for our waters. Because of the adoption of modern control technologies for air pollution, the quantity and the concentration of toxic chemicals being controlled and captured in our wastewater streams has greatly increased and is now being directly discharged into our public waterways across the nation.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 430 These dangerous chemicals, toxic metals, and known carcinogens, such as lead, arsenic, mercury, selen ium, and cadmium, present a clear public threat to our public health. For too long, we have failed to address adequately this pervasive problem. It's time to tackle this pollution. EPA's proposed standards will ensure that power plants are responsible fo r cleaning up their toxic pollution instead of pumping it into the lakes and streams where we swim, fish, and boat. The Sierra Club calls upon EPA to establish the strongest possible standards to address toxic wastewater pollution from coal fired power pla nts. America needs strong pollution standards to protect public health and the environment. EPA must require a final standard that adopts the proposals put forward in both Options 4 and 5 that mandate the dry handling of coal ash we well as water treatmen t technologies for scrubber sludge and leachate. Sierra Club supports a zero discharge policy. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public He aring Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 174 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am the Eastern regional director for the Sierra Club's Beyond Coal Campaign, and I, like my colleagues, am here to urge the EPA to swiftly adopt the most protective possible standards in its new Effluent Limitation Guidelines. I oversee 19 states in this great country from Maine to Florida, and over 70 percent of the coal plants in those states have no limits on the amount of toxic heavy metals that they can dump into our waterways. And I want to take a minute just to share two stories from those states that illustrate the need for the adoption for t he timely adoption of a zero liquid discharge standard. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 431 Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 175 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I'm here representing myself and as a member of the University of Maryland community in support of the EPA's updated Effluent Limitation Guidelines. I'm here in front of you today because coal burning power plant effluent affects my life and the life of the ones I love directly. I'm an outdoorsy person , and this inclination has found me teaching 100 undergraduate students at the University of Maryland. One of the perks of this job is getting to take them on weekly field trips. This fall, I will be taking them paddling in the Chesapeake Bay and to visi t a local coal plant. Unfortunately, we will be able to do both on the same trip. Currently, there are more than 30 coal fired power plants in the Chesapeake Bay watershed with untold cumulative effects on the Bay and all that depend on it. Comment Respon se: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 176 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Right now, four out of five coal plants in the U.S. have no limits on the amount of toxic waste they are allowed to dump into our water. Coal plants are perm itted to dump heavy metals like arsenics, selenium, boron, cadmium, mercury, and lead into our waterways, polluting drinking water, fishing areas, local rivers, and streams. And for the first time, the EPA has released national standards that limit the am ount of toxins that coal plants can dump in our waterways, and I want to thank you for this action. This is the first time in over 30 years that the standards for water pollution from coal plants has been updated, so thank you very much.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 432 And I thank you t oday not because I am directly affected by a coal power plant. I grew up in a relatively well off and clean neighborhood in San Jose, California, and now I live in Berkeley, neither of which have coal plants near me. I don't use public waterways very oft en, and my drinking water is fantastic, but I know that is not the case for all Americans, and I don't have to travel very far from home to see this. I can go a little north to the coal plant in Stockton or down to the ones in California Central Valley. O ver spring break, I actually did go to Central Valley, not to see coal plants, though. I went to learn about agriculture and labor issues, and there, I discovered a number of public health issues, the most pressing one being water quality. Comment Respons e: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 177 External R eview Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I come to you as a grandparent, a citizen, and an active member of the Sierra Club to offer my views on the proposed coal fired power plants water pollution st andards. To get to the bottom line immediately, I urge you to adopt the most complete and stringent rules. We really need it. When I arrived in Alexandria in 2002, I became involved with closing the Potomac River Generating Station, PRGS, otherwise known as the Mirant Plant or the GenOn Potomac River Generating Station. It keeps changing. It has a new name now. It's called the "NRG plant." This is one of the oldest coal fired power plants in the United States. It was the last one functioning in the met ropolitan D.C. area. Happily, it closed on October 1st, 2012. Proudly, I was one of the many activists who helped convince the current owner of the plant, the NRG Corporation, to shut it down. We used many different strategies to close this plant. One o f those strategies was an attack on the plant's lack of compliance to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, NPDES I'm sure you're familiar with that the permit requirements. The plant was running on an expired permit and requested a n ew one. The Sierra Club's legal staff gave me a copy of the document they had prepared to intervene in this matter. Sierra Club attorney Zachary M. Fabish and Joshua Stebbins and their staffEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 433 produced the April 13th, 2011, letter, which the Sierra Club sub mitted to the EPA On behalf of a large number of environmental organizations and itself. A copy of this letter was being provided. I left that outside in the box, but I'll do it electronically also. I want to take this opportunity to thank the Sierra Club 's legal team for producing such a well crafted, detailed, and comprehensive submission. The relevance of this letter to today's hearings is obvious. Many of the concerns that this letter addressed in 2011 are the same ones being addressed in the propose d regulations currently before the EPA. Some of the topics I will address do not relate directly to toxic waste, but they do help paint a more complete picture of the devastation and human toll that coal fired power plants produce. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 179 External Rev iew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Think of a lottery. Pay a dollar for a lottery ticket, and you could win a million bucks or a trip to Disneyland or a smaller prize. With the profits going for a benefit to support good causes like education or health or senior citizens, the current lack of limitation on toxic coal waste water pollution is like a reverse lottery. So instead of paying to win, we don't pay in order that some people lose. By all of us not paying a bit more for electricity to pretreat or treat wastewater from coal power plants, we are setting some of us up, both humans and animals, to, quotation marks, win the lottery of being personally having their health adversely affected by co al toxic waste. This is a lottery that most of us would not like to win, and most of us think we're not going to win because other people will win that lottery of having cancers or other health problems resulting from winning the lottery of ingesting toxic coal waste, and we think that other people will be subjected to it. But personally -- and I think many of us in this room by their testimony have said they would prefer to pay a bit more in order that some people, maybe some other people, maybe themselves , would not, quotation marks, win the toxic coal waste lottery. Now, D.C. might think, well, we're here in D.C. It's a very clean city, but we do have a coal plant still here. That's the D.C. Capitol Hill Power Plant that burns coal, natural gas, and fue l oil,Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 434 but they have recently requested an increase in their pollution to allow them to burn more coal because they are seeking to burn more -- to order more coal. And that is in a residential neighborhood on the Anacostia River watershed, and I live abou t 2 miles from it. So I think that we should end this lottery, the reverse lottery, we don't buy a ticket, and therefore, people are having their health impacted. I think we should -- and I agree with the Sierra Club that there should be zero toxic waste going into the waters, and we should go further than that and require that the winners of this lottery be the managers of the coal plants and the executives that are in charge of the coal companies that profit from this, that they should be required to liv e downriver or downstream and downwind from these plants themselves. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliati on: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 180 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: And I'm pleased to be able to testi fy in favor of the EPA ELG rule, the Effluent Limitation Guidelines, to finalize in the strongest form, eliminate and greatly reduce toxic dumping in our nation’s waterways that limit the amount of toxic materials that are dumped. These standards will also require coal plants to monitor and report amounts of pollution dumped into the water, giving us detailed information about the types and amounts of dangerous chemicals. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. C ommenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 183 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respon se: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 435 Comment Excerpt: Unlike Guatemala, the United States does have functioning state entities that can regulate urban industrial development to protect the jewels of our environment. It is time for the EPA to take up responsibility and enforce these pollution standards, so that communities across the country and future generations can enjoy the gifts nature gave us. It is time for the EPA to start regulating toxic discharge from coal plants, so that my children can one day swim in any river they want in this country. We cannot allow these dirty plants to deny the pleasures to future generations, the same way I was denied the clean air and clean water that my dad was able to enjoy. These regulations not only allow us to enjoy our environment, but they w ill also save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure that the water remains safe to drink. In a recent speech President Obama gave on climate change, he said, and I quote, "While we may not live to see the full realization of our ambition, w e will have the satisfaction of knowing that the world we leave our children will be better off for what we did." Now, none of us in this room may ever see the full benefits of these pollution standards across the country, but we will know that our childre n will be able to enjoy these benefits. So if you will not regulate this pollution for environmental reasons or for your own enjoyment and health, at least do it for the children. We owe it to them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 184 External Rev iew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Today, I urge the EPA to implement stringent water pollution standard for pretreatment at steam electric power plants to protect our national health and the envi ronment. many of the by products from burning coal don't end up in the air. Instead, byproducts such as lead, mercury, arsenic, and dozens of other metal pollutants end up as toxic sludge that must be pretreated before going to a treatment plant and then finally being re released into our nation's lakes, rivers, and oceans.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 436 Now, there have been significant steps taken to limit air pollution, most notably the limitations on sulfur emissions that were passed in the '90s. The results of these regulations wer e tangible and immediate. Americans saw a significant decrease in acidic rain. However, the standards that limit water pollution from power plants have not been updated in decades. Power plants have been able to dump the sludge by products from burning coal into our waterways and meet only bare minimum standards of toxic levels, all while making a handsome profit. The big issue with water pollution is that unlike with sulfur, the results of this pollution are not immediate. The long term health effects of these toxins can be deadly, cancer, birth defects, neurological damage, not to mention the effects on rivers’ or lakes’ or oceans' delicate ecological balance. I applaud the EPA for proposing the Effluent Limitation Guidelines we are here to testify tod ay about. Placing limits on the sludge leaving power plants makes sense, and telling polluters to lower the amounts of toxic metals they release seems not only logical, but necessary to protect the health of the American people. Comment Response: See res ponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 185 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The book titled "The Polluters," published in 2010, is a comprehensive exposé of assorted failures of the government to put public health and people before corporate prof its. The book documents a historical pattern of corporate influence, obstructions, dishonesty, and greed, combined with the complicity of government agencies that accepted and promoted flawed and weak risk assessment paradigms. Water transcends artificial political boundaries, so it is incumbent upon the EPA to enact the most stringent regulations, guidelines, and enforcement mechanisms that will protect us all. It is time to stop treating people and natural resources as if they were expendable. The chilli ng horror stories I have heard today are truly a national disgrace, and it also seems fraudulent for taxpayers to pay more and more to clean up or waterways, such as the Chesapeake Bay, while senseless and destructive industrial practices continue because regulations are lax or nonexistent.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 437 Northern Virginia toxicologist Dr. Janet Sherman maintains that harmful substances have no safe levels of exposure, and with that in mind, I applaud the EPA for holding this public hearing, so we can lend our support for unequivocally strong and protective actions that truly reflect the mission of this agency and that recognize and restore the integrity of our water sources and marine life as the commons that they are. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 186 External Review Flag: No External Review Externa l Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am currently a school teacher in Washington, D.C., and I told my students what I was doing this afternoon, and I was pretty excited with their enthusiasm for this issue and keeping the environmen t clean, and I asked them what were their thoughts. One student in particular was very excited. She was jumping out of her seat, and she said, "We need to keep the water clean because if we don't, we can get sick from drinking it, and we can even get can cer." And for a fourth grader, I was pretty impressed that she was already that aware of how important keeping our water clean is. Again, she and other students expressed their passion for the environment and keeping our water safe. So I want to thank yo u for your proposed regulations. I only wonder why this has taken so long to pass or hopefully will pass. It seems so obvious to keep water clean, but politics and money have a great impact. Water is a basic necessity for all humans, yet by contamina ting drinking water, we hurt all levels of society. Yet, those without the means to purchase bottled water must decide to use their limited resources to purchase a basic necessity in order to keep their family healthy, which impacts their ability to pay r ent, eat healthy, and enjoy other aspects of life. Clean water also allows for healthy fish populations which can be one of our most sustainable forms of food. We now have many alternative forms of energy that contribute to the power grid and reduce overal l waste. The EPA representing the United States on the global scale must set the precedent for other countries to follow. This is our world, which we want to leave for younger generations. The United States represents such a small portion of the world p opulation, yet produces a disproportionate amount of pollution. However, as developing countries with greater populations continue to modernize, they will harm the planet on a greater scale based on the model we have given them. They and we as citizens d epend on you to do the right thing and set these standards for one of our basic human needs.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 438 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 187 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am here today because of my own view that the EPA should enact the most stringent possible pretreatment standards for coal waste, but I know that I also represent other voices who can't be here today, those affected by coal based pollution and my friends and colleagues who share my views on this issu e. For years, community members and activists have been battling industry there, coal, steel, gypsum, and others, because of the health impacts on the respiratory health based on emissions and blowing coal sediment. Asthma has been rampant often for low i ncome residents of Detroit and the downriver neighborhoods, but many are less aware of the insidious nature of water pollution and the failure to enact Clean Water Act legislation to regulate toxic coal waste in an area that is surrounded by the Great Lake s, the Rouge River watershed, and a vast array of lakes that dot our landscape. This kind of pollution, which requires action by the EPA, affects my friends, my neighbors, my family, and community in Michigan. And Michigan water is not only for life; it is for recreation, transportation, and the flourishing of animals and plants. It is part of the Michigan imagery. In recent memory, we recall in Michigan the way industrial waste has devastated the Detroit River and Rouge River watershed. Fishing in Lake E rie, the Detroit River, the St. Clair River, and beyond has been devastated by mercury pollution, one of the key components of toxic coal waste that continues to be allowed to be leached into our watersheds across the United States. Coal waste not only con tains mercury, as we all know, but also carcinogens, and in a nation with an ongoing cancer epidemic, it seems rather unconscionable not to take action when we have the opportunity. This is the opportunity. Carcinogens, we know very well, like arsenic, ar e being released from coal plants and making toxic the watersheds they enter. I also think of my pregnant sister Sarah and the effects arsenic has on a developing fetus, and it worries me that this element is so easily dispersed by coal plants in our count ry.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 439 The effects of this pollution are already felt, but will be even more catastrophic without intervention by the EPA. If EPA's priority is human health, as it claims, and I am inclined to believe, it seems a very grave dereliction of its duty to enable t he continual hazard of toxic coal waste leaching into our water systems. I urge you to prioritize health over energy lobby persuasions and alleged self regulation. It is essential that the EPA adopt a zero discharge standard for coal plant waste. The st rictest regulation should be adopted for pretreatment, without question. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affil iation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 188 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The continued discharge of harm ful toxins such as arsenic, selenium, mercury, and lead from coal plants into the regions' waters limits our collective ability to appreciate and enjoy all that our Nation's Capital region has to offer. A power plant sits right across the Potomac from Anac ostia, and it's adjacent to Old Town Alexandria and only a few miles upriver from Mount Vernon. Toxic pollutants discharged from such plants affect the safety and serenity of the water. Activities such as fishing or swimming are unwise, while drinking th e water is foolish at best. The harm presented by unchecked toxic pollutants extends outside of the District's borders, as the Potomac and the Rock Creek, the Anacostia and the Tidal Basin defining waters of D.C., all form part of the greater watershed of the Chesapeake Bay, one of the greatest estuaries in the world. As the Chesapeake Bay region is the land of the Colonists, the heart of the Revolution and the Civil War, and the center of contemporary American political and civic life, millions of visitors from across the nation and around the world visit each year. As long as toxic pollutants are limitlessly discharged into the watershed's waters, the ability of these millions to enjoy the Chesapeake suffers.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 440 As the governmental steward of the health of o ur nation's water and air, EPA can help ensure that the waterways of this great region with the community's parks, monuments, and battlefields that line the shores will be kept clean and healthy for the enjoyment and safety of our entire nation. An EPA sta ndard that limits the amount of toxins like arsenic, selenium, mercury, and lead dumped into our water would go far in answering the public demand for clean, healthy, and safe water, and satisfy the recreational and hygienic needs of both residents and vis itors. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 189 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: So while we are making remarkable progress on the air front, it's critical that the EPA hold these same dirty power plants accountable f or the toxic pollution they are dumping into our country's waterways. A shocking four out of five of our nation's power plants have no limits on the amount of heavy metals they can dump into our streams and rivers. In fact, coal plants are the number one source of toxic water pollution in the United States. At this very moment, plants around the country are dumping deadly and carcinogenic pollutants into our water, toxins like arsenic, selenium, boron, cadmium, mercury, and lead. Every year, millions of tons of this extremely hazardous sludge are sent untreated into our lakes, rivers, and streams by corporate polluters more concerned about profit margins and executive bonuses than the health of their neighbors and customers, so we need you to act. I was m otivated to speak today because I am concerned about the water quality and the health of my family in my home state. Currently, Virginia has 16 active coal plants, and there are no limits on the amount of toxic waste they can dump into neighboring waterwa ys. At least seven of these plants are known to have discharges contaminated by heavy metalating coal ash or smokestack scrubber sludge, and of these, only four disclose to EPA how much arsenic they are discharging. Additionally, eight plants are dumping their waste into water bodies which have been formerly designated as having impaired water quality, including the James and York Rivers. Sadly, Virginia, like too many other states, is being poisoned by irresponsible corporate polluters. The good news is that you have the power, and indeed the obligation, to hold theseEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 441 bad players accountable. Your proposed Effluent Limitation Guidelines for steam electric generators would represent the first time that standards for water pollution from coal plants have b een updated in more than 30 years. As your agency has recognized, the current guidelines have not kept pace with developments in the industry and have failed to address the worst pollutants in our waterways. So the time to act is now. I strongly urge you to expeditiously move forward, enforce the Clean Water Act, and finalize this long overdue national standard. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliat ion: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 190 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: So while nearly four out of five c oal fired power plants in the U.S. have no limits on the amount of toxins they're allowed to discharge into surface water, every one of the 26 coal plants in Virginia, Maryland, and Massachusetts operate with no limit. Many of these plants do not even mon itor how much they discharge, and some discharge into water bodies that have been designated as having impaired water quality. The Proposed Rule helps correct these issues. Limiting the amount of toxic discharges will save lives, prevent illnesses, and pr otect freshwater ecosystems. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 392 0 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 191 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 442 I am here to join other civic groups to support the clean water, clean air, and other plans that EPA would take to reduce significantly harmful pollution or global warming from power plants and petroleum refineries, et cetera, to improve government function, and to protect people, families, and the communities from such harmful damages. First, the harmful pollution aff ect people's health, productivity, medical expenditure, individual, family, and social lives from both private and social cost benefit point of view. Power plants and refineries are producing carbon pollutions which are harmful for people in communities. Our taxpayers and general public have to pay that cost. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Numb er: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 192 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am here to join other civic groups to support the clean water, clean air, and other p lans that EPA would take to reduce significantly harmful pollution or global warming from power plants and petroleum refineries, et cetera, to improve government function, and to protect people, families, and the communities from such harmful damages. Firs t, the harmful pollution affect people's health, productivity, medical expenditure, individual, family, and social lives from both private and social cost benefit point of view. Power plants and refineries are producing carbon pollutions which are harmful for people in communities. Our taxpayers and general public have to pay that cost. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 193 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 443 Clearly, we all agree that uncontaminated drinking wate r is essential to human life, to human survival, so I applaud the decision to tighten our water regulations. However, I strongly urge the EPA to set zero discharge standards as well as aggressively treat heavy metals in wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 194 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I became interested in conservation with Rachel Carson's book "Silent Spring," and that seemed to lead to the founding of EPA in 1970 and then the passage of the Cle an Water Act in 1972, which stated as a goal that it would eliminate all water pollution by 1985. Well, that's quite an ambitious goal, and we see it certainly wasn't met. In fact, I seemed to have learned a lot today that things are far worse than I eve r imagined. In fact, I don't think most Americans have even a clue that the EPA is not successfully regulating the environment to their best ability and reducing pollution in water, and I was surprised that 70 to 80 percent of coal plants have no limits on the amount of pollutants they put in the water. I think most Americans would be shocked by that, even those who have been active politically, as I have. But I am happy that we have the data now that's collected, even if it took 30 years, and we have the technology to actually move forward on this, and I want to thank you for proposing the new rule for cleaning up toxic water pollution from coal fired power plants. I am particularly happy to learn that the EPA has the authority to protect the water from to xic coal waste. It's just a matter of moving forward and doing it. Of course, I know there are many people who are not well, let me first say I didn't hear any person here today speak out in opposition to having clean water, and I think all Americans want clean water, but there are economic interests, the coal industry particularly, that would be greatly hurt by some regulations. And so I just am urging you, please do what the EPA was set to do, which is protect our water for the public good and not b e too influenced by arguments that this would be economically damaging or we have to delay further, even though it's taken 30 years to get to this point. The American people count on the action of the EPA. We can't expect much from our Congress right now, and it is through regulation that we can really make the most progress.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 444 So I would say please see the power plants install zero liquid discharge technology and implement Options 4 and 5 because the weakest option would only control 468 million pounds of p ollution a year, while the strongest Option 4 and 5 would control 5.3 billion pounds of pollution per year. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 195 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt : Sadly, even though the earth is covered in water, much of it has become unusable because of human pollution due to human activities, especially from particular industries. Water is considered polluted when its contamination is at the point that is unf it for use. If water is polluted, you can’t drink it, you can't swim in it, and you can't eat fish out of it, as well as affecting all the wildlife that depends on the polluted water. They also become at risk. It's also important to understand how water g ets polluted. The toxins that power plants have been putting into the water system are incredible in some ways, because they are such huge polluters. According to your own statistics, more than half of the toxic pollutants discharged into surface, our dr inking and our swimming water, are from these plants. We need to have zero discharge now. I think 30 years has been long enough. We can't actually allow these companies to continue dumping toxins into unlined pools simply because it goes into the groundw ater, and groundwater exists between the surface, obviously, and that actually supposedly stays on an average of 1,400 years. So, basically, dilution has not been the solution, even if we're saying let's just put it in a pond next to the you know, it wi ll be okay. You know, I've been to the Berkeley Pit, and I don't know. I think they have to shoot things off of it. Anyways, the strongest rules that need to become regulation, simply because there is no reason not to regulate, and we really need to save , obviously, our greatest resource, which is our water.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 445 Today's technology actually are very cost effective, and they clean the toxins out of the water quite well. Past regulations actually have helped American businesses become much more competitive, and as a member of a small business, I want to have you look maybe at a different way of understanding how the economy actually works. If we as leaders of the world basically want our companies to be as credibly competitive, we need to actually put in regulation so the actual innovation can come forward. So I know that there's pressures to say otherwise, but what I would say is if you regulate, companies are not going to be affected in any detrimental way. In fact, we will continue to have our technolo gy grow, and we will be able to export that to other parts of the world that are in actual need of this technology. So I know that zero discharge policy, you know the Options 4 and 5 have been discussed, but I want you to understand that private companies are going to be innovating, and we will actually have a competitive advantage. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Public Hearing Transcript Commenter Affiliation: Public Hearing Transcript Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 196 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With the passage of the C lean Water Act of 1972, Congress set a national goal to ensure clean water for all Americans; however, we are long overdue in dealing with toxic water pollution from power plants. Coal fired power plants are the largest source of toxic water pollution in t he United States, dumping billions of pounds of pollution into America's rivers, streams, and lakes each year. These pollutants, including lead and mercury, can be dangerous to humans and wreak havoc in our watersheds, even in very small amounts. EPA has identified over 250 individual instances where coal plants have harmed ground or surface water. Because many coal plants sit on recreational lakes and reservoirs, are upstream of drinking water supplies, those thousands of miles of poisoned waters have an impact on peopleEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 446 across the country. Coal water pollution raises cancer rates, makes fish unsafe to eat, and can inflict lasting health problems on our children. Power plants should be required to adopt the best available technology to reduce the most am ount of pollution. The technology exists and is already in use in some plants. There's no reason for power plants to continue dumping arsenic, lead, selenium, mercury, and other toxic pollutants in our water. While I applaud EPA's proposal to deal with t his important water pollution problem, only two of the proposed options, Options 4 and 5, would begin to fix this problem, and some of the weakest options proposed are completely unacceptable. A strong rule would create hundreds of dollars in benefits eve ry year in the form of improved health and recreational opportunities, not to mention the priceless benefits of clean and healthy watersheds. Unless EPA acts, this problem is only going to get worse, as more power plants install air pollution control scrub bers that essentially take toxics out of the air and dump them in our water. By the agency's own estimate, this toxic wastewater stream is going to increase by 28 percent over the next 15 years. There is no reason to tolerate continued dumping, and the Cl ean Water Act mandates cleanup. We can eliminate most, if not all, coal plant water pollutions for pennies a day. The strongest of EPA's proposed options will get us to that future. So I strongly encourage the EPA to finalize a strong rule to clean up A merica's waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Disha Banik Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A10 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Right now 4/5 coal plants in the U.S. have no limits on the amount of toxic waste they're allowed to dump into our water. Coal plants are permitted t o dump heavy metals like arsenic, selenium, boron, cadmium, mercury and lead into our waterways, polluting our drinking water, fishing areas, local rivers and streams. But for the first time, the EPA has released national standards that limit the amount of toxins that coal plants can dump in our waterways. I want to thank and commend the EPA for this action. This is the first time in our 30 years that the standards for water pollution from coal plants haw been updated. These standards will require all coal plants to monitor and report the amount ofEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 447 toxins dumped into our water, and provide detailed information about the types and amounts of dangerous chemicals in our water. I thank the EPA today not because I'm directly affected by a coal power plant. I grew up in a relatively well - off and clean neighborhood in San Jose, California and now live in Berkeley, neither of which have coal plants near me. I don't use public waterways often, and my drinking water is great. But I know that's not the case for all Amer icans. And I don't have to travel far from my home to see this. I can go a little north to the coal plant in Stockton or down to the ones in California's Central Valley. Our spring break I actually did go to Central Valley, not to see the coal plants thoug h. I went to learn about agriculture and labor issues. There I discovered a number of public health issues, the most pressing one being water quality. So I want to remind the EPA the gravity of its proposed regulations, specifically their impact on the hea lth of the individuals I met in March. And while I thank the EPA, I want to remind the agency that there's more to be done. I encourage the agency to be bolder and more thorough. EPA should be setting zero discharge standards on coal plants, and requiring rigorous treatment of toxic heavy metals in any remaining waste. I encourage the EPA to move forward on these additional rules, and to do so as quickly as possible. This is because I know that having safe, clean drinking water shouldn't be a privilege. It should be a basic right. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Earle Mitchell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A12 Comment Excerpt Nu mber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Now, we as a Nation are better informed. It has been proven that COAL ASH/WASTE is harmful to the environment. It contains mercury, lead, arsenic, selenium and other harmful chemicals. The TVA had a massive coal ash spill in DEC 2008 in which 1.1 BILLION gals.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 448 Broke loose from containment and ended up contaminating 300 acres of farmland and homes. And five years later no one can estimate when the land can be reclaimed and put back into a useful condition. There are hundreds of millions of dollars of law suits and cleanup expenses from this tragedy which could have been prevented. And we the TAXPAYERS will foot the bill. And this happened at a Federal Government facility which takes more precautions than any PROFIT driven enterprise. Another massive spill took place in Lake Michigan in Nov 2011 from a commercial coal plant. And I could list more. And so - the problems have not gone away. Today, 40 years after the CLEAN WATER ACT was passed in 1972 39% of our rivers are still contaminated. Rather than weakening the CLEAN WATER ACT it needs to be strengthened. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Ernest Lehmann Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A16 Comment Excerpt Number: 3 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In summary, make certain the effluent from the power plants is clean. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Patricia Schuba Commenter Affiliation: Labadie Environmental Organizati on Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A30 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: People impacted by your decisions,my family (show picture of my niece who has grown up 1/2 mile from coal waste sites, drinking well water) and the millions across this nation living near plants, waste ponds and waste landfills,strongly support the most stringent regulatory standards. It is our position that the EPA should set zero discharge standards and require rigorous treatment of toxic heavy metals in any remaining waste discharged to our floodplains, rivers, streams, and bodies of water.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 449 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt N umber 1. Commenter Name: Cheryl Nenn Commenter Affiliation: Milwaukee Riverkeeper Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A7 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No C omment Excerpt: In Milwaukee, We Energies' Valley Power Plant is one of the oldest, coal - fired steam electric power plants in the country and creates steam and electricity for most of downtown Milwaukee. This plant finally received a new wastewater disch arge permit in fall 2012 -- their previous permit was last issued in 1987 and was one of the oldest expired water permits in the country. Valley's permit, like these proposed rules that were last updated nearly 30 years ago, allowed for antiquated technology that is not in compliance with new laws, best management practices, or science. These proposed water pollution standards for steam power plants are long overdue. The standards should be finalized in their strongest form to ensure that coal plants eliminat e their most toxic discharges, and finally use available control technology to treat heavy metals. We support EPA in their promulgation of these standards, as they are finally tackling a major source of water pollution. Toxic wastewater discharge from powe r plants is also anticipated to greatly increase -- by 28% in the next 15 years -- as more pollutants are scrubbed out of the air and discharged into our waterways, either directly or after being treated by a public treatment facility. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Cheryl Nenn Commenter Affiliation: Milwaukee Riverkeeper Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A7 Comment Excerpt Number: 4 External Review Flag: No External Revi ew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Given these challenges, it's especially important that EPA set zero discharge standards for heavy metals and other pollutants, and require rigorous treatment ofheavy metals in any remaini ng waste. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 450 Commenter Name: Cheryl Nenn Commenter Affiliation: Milwaukee Riverkeeper Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A7 Comment Excerpt Number: 8 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Given both the significant challenges facing Milwaukee's Rivers and the tremendous opportunities that exist, we hope that EPA will select the stronge st effluent limitations possible to limit the amount of toxics in our waterways and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Dalal Abou lhosn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A8 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With the passage of th e Clean Water Act in 1972 Congress set a national goal to ensure clean water for all Americans. However, we are long overdue in dealing with toxic water pollution from power plants. Coal - fired power plants are the largest source of toxic water pollution in the United States, dumping billions of pounds of pollution into America's rivers, streams, and lakes each year. These pollutants, including lead and mercury can be dangerous to humans and wreak havoc in our watersheds even in very small amounts. EPA h as identified over 250 individual instances where coal plants have harmed ground or surface waters. Because many coal power plants sit on recreational lakes and reservoirs, or upstream of drinking water supplies, those thousands of miles of poisoned waters have an impact on people across the country. Coal water pollution raises cancer risks, makes fish unsafe to eat, and can inflict lasting health problems on our children. Power plants should be required to adopt the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. The technology exists and is already in use at some plants - there is noEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 451 reason for power plans to continue dumping arsenic, lead, selenium, mercury and other toxic pollutants into our water. While I applaud EPA proposal to deal with this important water pollution problem, only two of the proposed options (Options 4 & 5) would begin to fix this problem, and some ofthe weakest options proposed are completely unacceptable. A strong rule would create hundreds of millions of dollar s in benefits every year in the form of improved health and recreational opportunities, not to mention the priceless benefits of clean and healthy watersheds. Unless EPA acts, this problem is only going to get worse as more power plants install air pollut ion control scrubbers that essentially take taxies out of the air and dump them in the water. By the agency's own estimate, this toxic wastewater stream is going to increase by 28 percent over the next 15 years. There is no reason to tolerate continued du mping, and the Clean Water Act mandates clean up. We can eliminate most, if not all, coal plant water pollution for pennies a day. The strongest of EPA's proposed options will get us to that future. I strongly encourage the EPA to finalize a strong rule to clean up America's waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Diana Dascala - Joffe Commenter Affiliation: Chesapeake Climate Action Network Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A9 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: On behalf of our over 80,000 members, activists and volunteers in Maryland and Virginia, we ar e here today to urge EPA to finalize the strongest regulatory option for power plant wastewater effluent discharges in order to protect the health of our local waterways and communities. CCAN is submitting comments on behalf of our members that live within five miles of large coal - fired power plants in Maryland and Virginia, and are negatively impacted by these facilities on a daily basis. EPA has repeatedly acknowledged that the existing effluent guidelines, that are over 30 years old, have not kept pace w ith developments in the industry and have utterly failed to protect local waterways from the worst pollutants, such as toxic metals, that are discharged from these facilities. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 452 Commenter Name: Diana Dascala - Joffe Commenter Affiliation: Chesapeake Climate Action Network Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3920 - A9 Comment Excerpt Number: 4 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: That is why CCAN is here today. We urge EPA to revise the effluent limitation guidelines for power plants and make them as strong as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. C. Sugrue Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3921 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Exce rpt: You must stop power power plant pollution arsenic; lead; selenium; mercury. Impose strong standards; make our rivers, streams, lakes, and ponds safe and clean. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Comm enter Name: C. Arvidson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3924 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I u rge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect the health of North Carolina's communities and environment. By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, the EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerou s ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and certainlyEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 453 requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. It is eviden t that coal ash poses a significant threat to the health of North Carolina's communities and environment. The Environmental Protection Agency should require power plants to use the best available technology to reduce pollution. Comment Response: See respo nse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Allison Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3925 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean and clear drinking water is worth more than oil, without water we can not live. By ignoring this pollution to public waterways, your are endorsing the killing of plants, animals and humans. Ple ase consider strengthening the laws and ensuring that protection of public resources. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. McGovern Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3926 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have a 5 month old and a 2 year - old and I want them to inherit a planet with clean air and clean water. Along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. This will make my children vulnerable to cancers and other diseases.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 454 Clean air and water is a basic human right. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Necessary Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3927 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is a precious and necessary reso urce. As a Texan, I understand this all too well. We owe it to our children and the generations that will come after them to make certain they have clean, safe water. We've waited long enough. Please make every effort now to protect our water. Comment Resp onse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Harrington Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3929 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Extern al Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I along with my many friends of the sierra Club urge the EPA take action in support of zero discharge water polution standards now, not in 5, or 10 or 15 years after more damage ou r waters and water life is eventually irreversable. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Booth Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3930 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 455 Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Be the s tewards of the environment that will protect our health and future resources for our citizens today and tomorrow. It is a moral imperative to do what is right for the long view. Please know I speak for so many like minded voters. Comment Response: See res ponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Roberts Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3931 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Externa l Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. My husband, a retired Civil Engineer, and I live within 20 miles of one of the offen ding power plants. We retired to these mountains in 2002 because of the natural beauty and what we thought would be exceptionally clean air. At ages 75 and 80, we urge you to implement the strongest possible safeguards against toxic wastewater today! Comme nt Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. B. Hardy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3932 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In N.C. we're not far from the worst cities for asthma in the U.S., so polluted air's a growing problem here. Always included are cities in Ga., Tenn., and Va. - http://b it.ly/yCFbXW So,Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 4 56 please stand up for N.C. families and communities by implementing the strongest possible safeguards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. A. Phelps Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3933 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and c ommunities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. The power plant industry has been allowed to contaminate our groundwater and our rivers for decades with coal ash waste, while environmental protections have been ignored, unenforced, inadequate or nonexistent. Please require power plants to store coal ash waste in leakproof containment systems before our water is further compromised by toxic chemicals. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Baker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3934 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I live alon g the mighty Ohio River and see several smokestacks' waste from my home. I will no longer swim nor ski nor eat any fish from these waters as I used to as a child. I have survived THREE major cancers and having worked as a RN, knew and saw cancer patients d aily. Still do. My family who no longer live here claim that they do not see the concentration of cancer and other illnesses we have here in "Cancer Valley". In the name of humanity, clean it up! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2 265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 457 Commenter Name: D. Heckman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3935 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respons e: No Comment Excerpt: MONEY shouldn't run the EPA. These rules were put into place because of LOVE Canal and the toxic waste dumps (I think there were like 25 or more in New Jersey where we lived at the time). UPDATE and stand firm! ALL our health safet y is involved! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Smiley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3936 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. It's really very simple, when you make a mes s you clean it up. Just like when you were growing up. The things mother taught you still apply today. At least that's how I was raised. I never shit in someone else's toilet and expected them to flush it. That just seemed rude. So does asking the people t o clean up after the coal industry while they take the profits to the bank. Just my $.02. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Crawshaw Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Con trol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3938 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 458 Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. The beautiful waterways of NC serve many people in many ways from drinking water to swimming and boating and other recreational pursuits. The toxic chemicals leached from the coal ash makes the water unsafe for recreation and any use in the homes or for manufacturing. Please implement strong safeguards to preserve our water ways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Lian Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3939 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communitie s by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. I live on Lake James in the foothills and have kayaked on the Catawba River and know how very important it is to have clean waterways in NC. Please do all you can to protect us and our children and grand children from polluted water. It's possible and the best safeguards need to be put in place now. Please help. Thanks. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Hoerz Commenter Affiliation: Pri vate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3940 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I feel strongly about the health of our communities and environment, but I feel even stronger about the health of myself and my children, who are in direct contact with this state's waterways when canoeing and kayaking. Please put the health of our children before the money saving concerns of the large corpora tions that benefit from the lack of restrictions imposed upon them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 459 Commenter Name: J. Williams Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - O W - 2009 - 0819 - 3941 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have two granddaughters, ages 2 and 4 who enjoy the water of Lake Norman. I need your help in keepin g it clean from the coal ash ponds that are near the lake...epically those at the Marshall Steam Plant. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Voelker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3942 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by im plementing the strongest safeguards possible. My relatives live in Catawba County so I especially want them and their children to have safe drinking water. If your water source was polluted, wouldn't you want it cleaned up? Thank you in advance for making the decision for the good of all people! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. McGlinn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3943 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 460 All companies that burn coal should be requirede to manage their waste in a manner that protects the environment and the health of people. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Schoaff Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3944 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Every generation leaves a legacy of waste the next will damn them for. Time for us to belly up to the worst of the worst problems in our state, the waste coal piles that leach acid water into the ground and into the streams used for recreation and water supply. Each of us has to do the right thing to not only clean up the mess left to us but also to prevent new ones from forming. Put our unemployed to work. Cle an up the mess. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Bayless Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3945 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Extern al Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Sometimes I get tired just talking about scientific facts. The basic fact we all should honor is the basic right of every person, yes, even those yet to co me, to have a chance at clean air to breathe. Please don't worry so much about money these plants bring in. Start thinking about the air none of us will be able to breathe! Do the right thing (or at least ask your children what you should do!) Comment Resp onse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 461 Commenter Name: P. Jordan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3947 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External R eview External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. The Roman civilization began to crumble when their habit of wearing whi te lead powder as makeup began to degrade their intellects and their health. Is America's lead powder going to be the coal ash in our air? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Dollar Comme nter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3948 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolin a's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. What kind of a planet do we want to leave for our future generations? I ask you to help it not become a toxic wasteland. Require companies to clean up their energy sources now, not in many years. The longer it is put off the more likely it will never happen and the more damage will be done in the meantime. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Lane Commenter Affi liation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3949 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 462 Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's famil ies and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Nature is forgiving but eventually we will damage our home to the point that it will not support healthy human life unless we take steps to protect the environment. And we have a respon sibility as stewards of Earth to the other living things that are here with us. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Sutherland Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3950 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I treasure the Cape Fear River and its tributaries in North Carolina and I want to see the strongest protections for them possible. Plus I happen to enjoy drinking water myself, and don't want these toxins anywhere near our drinking water intakes. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commen ter Name: M. Spiegel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3951 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please do not forget Mister McCarthy, your family drinks the same water and breathes the same air and will suffer the same consequences as the rest of us if something is not done soon. If not for us, for your children and grandchildren. Comment Response: See re sponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 463 Commenter Name: A. Orozco Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3954 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Externa l Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Without drinkable, not polluted clean waters. We will not survive as a human race in this planet. Its up to us to make this planet livable for us and our children! Comment Response: See response t o DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Zega Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3956 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review I ncorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Adopt the strongest protections from power plant water pollution (Docket # EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819). Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Call Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3958 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Coal - fired power plants prod uce more toxic waste than any other industry in the United States, including the chemical, plastic, and paint manufacturing industries. They spew millions of pounds of pollutants into our waters every year, and they'll keep at it as long as the Reagan - era rules go unchanged.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 464 We've come a long way since 1982, when our government believed the gravest threat to our future was the Soviet Union and nobody gave much thought to the emerging science of climate change. We know a lot more about the toxic chemicals th at coal plants belch into our air and dump into pits, ponds, lakes, and streams. Strong new protections against mercury and soot are absolutely necessary for the health of our planet. It's been more than three decades -- our communities can't wait another 30 years to get this right. Myself and many others want real protections against Big Coal's toxic waste water and air pollution. Along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - disc harge water pollution standards, then to REPLACE the coal power plants and nuclear power plants (please read about Fukushima and the hazards of all other nuclear power plants here: http://www.infowars.com/fukushima - apocalypse - years - of - duct tape - fixes - could - result - in - millions - of - deaths/) with clean, Green energy systems such as wind and solar farms. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Hargis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3959 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As I read the above information, I wondered how many of us believe: WATER IS NECESSARY FOR LIFE. We are fortunate to live in America where fresh water is available to most. Coal waste has been proven to be a hazard to our safe water. Pro cedures are known for avoiding polluting our water supplies. An alarming number of coal companies do not use the information. Some companies fight against taking the responsibility of protecting our water. More than enough time has been given them to stop poisoning our water. Do you support having fresh, clean and safe water available for everyone? It is past time for us to take action. We must have the most stringent guidelines in place to ensure safe water and we must have oversight which assures quick an d certain action when those guidelines are violated. This is not negotiable. In American our goal is to provide an opportunity for anyone to build his/her own business as long as that person understands the responsibility which comes with the opportunity. There mustEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 465 be evidence that every effort is being made to do no harm to the earth or to anyone who is now or will be living on it Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Morales Commenter Aff

iliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3960 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect the health of North Carolina's communities and environment. By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, the PA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. It is evident that coal ash poses a significant thr eat to the health of North Carolina's communities and environment. The Environmental Protection Agency should require power plants to use the best available technology to reduce pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Ex cerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Nowlin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3961 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Co mment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. I would also like to add that we must hold big polluters responsible for their actions, stop sweeping our energy wastes and ot her hazardous waste under the carpet hoping it will resolve itself. Here we could slap a $10,000 fine for a boater who may unknowingly pump dirty bilge water overboard but, have no meaningful penalty for a big polluter who knowinglyEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 466 could harm our drinking water in a much more damaging way. I sincerely hope legislation could be passed that would stop the recklessness that is underway. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: I. Seigel Commenter Af

filiation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3962 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Too many times the large companies promi se everything will be safe, and we the American Public have to pay the price in ruined environment and the cost to remediate the problem. Stop them NOW! and we won't have these worries. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excer pt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Szilvagyi Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3963 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: While pregnant, I had trouble finding any food I could keep down. Many people can commiserate. The only thing that appealed to me was fish, which is absolutely to be avoided, despite the important nutrients it imparts, good for fetal bra in development like no other substance. This was more of a problem for me than for some of my peers, because I had been malnourished for the previous two years. It would have been very beneficial to say they least to have had something to eat during my pre gnancy; and moreover, to have been permitted DHA and the omega - 3 fatty acids found in fish that promote the development the unique human brain. Unfortunately, it's those fattier, cold - water, higher - predator fish that accumulate the persistent pollutants mo st. As you read this, think about a skinny pregnant lady who lost her job because of her constantly losing consciousness, who would have done so much better were there good fish to eat.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 467 Coal - fired power plants are dumping wastewater that contains metals an d other harmful chemicals into the Great Lakes and their tributaries. Exposure to these toxic substances - which include arsenic, lead and mercury - can cause cancer, birth defects, developmental problems in children and other health problems. Mercury can make fish unsafe to eat and is the primary cause of fish consumption advisories in the Great Lakes. I urge you to finalize a strong rule to protect the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants should be required to use the best technolog y available to "dry handle" waste from fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for scrubber sludge waste. This "zero liquid discharge" technology will eliminate release of the most highly contaminated wastewaters entirely. Comment Respons e: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Stanley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3964 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. I have lived in NC all my 41 years. My family and friends fish these waters both recreationally and commercially. Most of my life I have lived eating what we catch. How many of my health problems are associated with these polluted waters? It's past time to clean this up. Please hold these companies to a higher s tandard to achieve this. Everyday people are charged for dumping pollutiants (as they should be). Large companies should not be exempt from the same laws. Make us The Crystal Coast again. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exc erpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Schoenhoff Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3965 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 468 Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Coal ash (the toxic waste left behind after coal is burned for energy) is a serious threat to North Carolina's waterways an d communities.The good news is that the EPA has proposed a set of new standards that will begin to fix the coal ash pollution problem. Each year, coal fired power plants dump millions of pounds of heavy metals directly into lakes, rivers, and streams. Powe r plant wastewater contains nasty toxic metals like arsenic, boron, cadmium, selenium, lead, and mercury. But the new national standards could limit the amount of toxins dumped in our waterways from coal fired power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Cooper Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3966 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Revie w Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I'm writing to respectfully request and urge the EPA to enact guidelines and standards for coal plants that will assist to better safeguard and protect the health of our nation's communities and environme nt - especially here in North Carolina, where my family and I reside. Requiring coal power plants to utilize the best available technology so as to protect the health of both citizens and the environment is, I believe, a fundamental responsibility of gover nment - i.e., monitoring and insuring that citizens can live with a sense of trust that their lives and those of their families are not being subjected to unnecessary and potentially toxic and deadly substances. Insomuch as water is basic to all life, the protection of our rivers and our groundwater by requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water is - I believe - a positive, protective requirement that is of positive benefit both to persons and the environment. C omment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Shapard Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3967 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 469 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Years ago my husband and I hiked up to the top of one of the highest mountains in the Czech Republic and there was nothing on this mountain for us to enjoy. Soot everywhe re, leafless trees and grass - less land was all we saw -- and we left feeling deeply sad, uneasy, as the factory not too far from the mountain continued to burn its energy and release its waste into the air, which was carried by the wind over this mountain and beyond the mountain. I can't even begin to imagine what else was in the process of being destroyed, and the impact it had on the area's families, tourist industry and the rippling effect it had on the neighbors and border countries. So for both environ mental and economic reasons, please do whatever you can to implement the strongest safeguards possible to conserve, protect and add to our resources . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Blackwell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3969 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up fo r North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. NC Is one of the most beautiful states in the union with good, hard working, tax paying, voting citizens that want to keep our state as pristine as possible not only for our generation but generations to come. In addition to us our diverse species of plants and animals depend upon a balanced eco system to survive. Anything that upsets that balance just isn't exceptable to us. TOXIC HEAVY METALS KILL. That is all y ou need to understand to make an intelligent right decision. After all you are the Environmental "Protection" Agency so please protect the environment we live in here in NC. Before you make your final ruling I urge you to visit our beautiful Smoky & Appala chian Mountains. See if you would want this messed with if you lived here. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 470 Commenter Name: L. Lavallee Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3970 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. If coal plants use dry systems to move hazardous coal ash, that will be a more sustainable aproach for North Carolinians as well as our delicat e local and global environment. My hope is that the EPA will always do the right thing for our citizens and environment with the most mindful and sustainable steps possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Gilliam Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3971 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: NC politicians just carved out a sweet heart deal for coal ash ponds so now more than ever EPA needs to step up and protect drinking water from toxin contamination. Wilmington NC gets the majority of its public drinking water from the Cape Fear River, w hich has a giant coal ash pond sitting right beside it. Do right by the American people and make industries accountable for these nasty, toxic ponds. It's a no brainer to me. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 . Commenter Name: B. Coulson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3973 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 471 Comment Excerpt : I fail to understand why a corporation has the power to harm others in order to loosen regulations to serve investors. Short term gain seems to be the driving force behind such callous action even though their own families may be hurt. I urge you to st and up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Blythe Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3974 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our freshwater sources are decreasing all the time and we must do be tter to protect our water sources. We cannot act like our decisions about water don't matter. Water is essential and it is our responsibility to make sustainable methods that can provide our nation and our world with water sources for everyone. Comment Res ponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Klein Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3975 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External R eview External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In light of the recent resignation of our state's EPA head in NC, I am concerned that the state no longer cares about the air we breath, the beauty of the state, the water we drink. It is unfortunate that we must look to the Federal Government to provide laws that apply to all states. Please finalize a strong rule. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 472 Commenter Name: C. Paynter Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3976 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's f amilies and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. State governments are under too much pressure from business to act in the long - term interests of their citizens. The vagaries of politics add another layer of difficulty. We need fe deral agencies charged with protecting our natural resources to counterbalance the industries whose profits grow greater when unregulated. Please act - finally! - to better regulate coal ash disposal. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Hartman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3977 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. For so long companies have been allowed to produce pollution and waste without reguard to cleaning it up. I bel ieve that if you make a mess you clean it up and don't expect others to. That is one of our major problems. We don't pay for the full cost of the product, and we expect the government or somebody else to pay for the clean up costs. Comment Response: See r esponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Baird Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 473 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3978 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Externa l Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. We depend on you to be out voice and do everything in your power to protect North Ca rolina's land and people. I'm a native, and I urge you to speak on behalf of what's best for our state -- not big business. Thank you for your time and consideration. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Torrey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3979 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: T he best available technology for these facilities is zero liquid discharge. In addition, coal ash must be stored in lined facilities in a dry state, otherwise it leaches toxic metals and other pollutants into groundwater and also leaks from the berms of th ese impoundments. It's time to move away from medieval "technology" in our handling of coal ash! Please implement the strongest possible requirements for new and existing facilities. Thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 226 5, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Simard Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3980 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 474 Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Recent blood tests by taken my doctor have shown high levels if arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury and aluminum. Do you know what your levels are? Please act for the health and well being for all human beings now and future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Siebers Commenter Affiliation: Privat e Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3981 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communit ies by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. North Carolina should not be seeking first place for EPA Superfund Sites. We need to be more conscientious about our state's soil, water, and air. I thank you for your votes in protecting the North Car olina Environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Herring Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3983 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Coal Ash, something can be done, please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 475 The EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year, by requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water. Our childrens health should not be about money Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: V. Motsinger Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3984 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Rev iew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Coal Ash, something can be done, please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. The EPA can eliminate millions of gallon s of dangerous ash wastewater every year, by requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water. Our childrens health should not be about money Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Burns Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3985 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment E xcerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Coal ash presents a serious threat to North Carolina's communities and environment. The EPA ought to require power plants to use the best available technology to reduce their pollution, and stop alowing utilities to simply make bland promises to evade action. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 476 Commenter Name: R. & D. Shew Commenter Affi liation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3986 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's famil ies and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. We have issues with coal ash storage here in the Wilmington area with groundwater pollution and it certainly occurs throughout the state. Safeguards should be in place to make sure the contaminants never go off site and should not be allowed to reach the property boundary. Please protect the health of our citizens with meaningful requirements to insure no threats to the communities and environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Richards Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3988 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Inc orporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please take heed as you must know there are many such as myself who wish to preserve what is left of our planets CLEAN resources as well as health concerns which need to be alleviated and can with your assista nce. Thanks for listening and making the correct life choices for us now and our up and coming children AND theirs, etc. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Pollock Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3990 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 477 Comment Excerpt: Growing up in the shadow of the coal plants in the mountains of Tennessee, i have seen first hand how such things can be disasterous for communities, such as the Kingston TN waste spill that destroyed huge parts of Harriman County, mere miles from my family. Please stand up for North Carolina's families a nd communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Fetzer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 3991 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Eastern NC has some of the most pristine, beautiful, and importantly natural areas for sea food production in the world. Lichens grow on the north side of our oak trees here new Wilmington, NC, an indication of the quality of the air. River otters, heron, bald eagles, dolphin, osprey and painted buntings populate this area and depend on clean waterways for the ir existence. Please help us maintain this important region's ecology as healthy and sound and stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible against coal ash. Thank you for your consideration. Comm ent Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Mastro Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3992 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Ex ternal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 478 Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. As a cancer survivor, I am especially interested in toxic heavy metals in the environment, since scientists have found that environmental toxins are a cause of cancer. It's time to clean up the power plant environment with the strictest regulations possible. The power companies can afford to clean up their waste, thou gh they have been saying for years that they can't. Protect the health of North Carolina families. Don't give in to the special interests, who are only interested in the bottom line. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Livingston Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3993 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comm ent Excerpt: Strongest possible safeguards should not even be an issue: The present, as well as the future, of our financial and physical well being as individuals and as a state, depend upon it. Thank you for your attention to this important issue. Comm ent Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Robertson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3994 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 479 Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. A study of rivers across the USA by the National Geographic Society 3 or 4 years ago found that the fish in every river in North Carolina had significantly higher than acceptable levels of the toxic heavy metals found in coal production and further study found that the source of those pollutants was from strip mini ng and mountaintop removal processes of coal production, including open pond storage of wastewater of that coal, in the Appalachian Mountain Range. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: F. Rag an Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3995 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I used to love to fish. Now you couldn't pay me to eat anything out of most bodies of water. I don't allow my dogs to drink from lakes, streams, or rivers. But what of all of the other people who aren't aware of the poisons in our water? What of all the other animals who must dri nk? Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Halloran Commenter Affiliation: P rivate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3996 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Profit mad corporations have poisoned our air and wat er. It is the job to keep these out - of - control monsters in restraints.. To hell with their filthy profits. The people and the environment are far too important. It is way past time to put these remorseless parasites on a very short leash.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 480 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Neufer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3997 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's obvious that North Carolina needs the protection of the Federal govt. regarding the environment. We used to be conscientious of the beauty and function of our natural resources. Recent ly, that has all been usurped by our state officials. So much so that one of our DNER officials resigned in protest. Please.... Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Lundin Commenter Affili ation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 3999 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I concure with the following statement but m ust question why logical steps like this take so long, and /or is the EPA really as ineffective as they seem. ( Underfunded/ under manned - and lacking authority to instill a change by the contaminating perpetrators in general...not JUST the coal industry/ the profiteers. Along with all 2.1 million Sierra Club members and supporters, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from powe r plants. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 481 Commenter Name: P. Kelly Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4000 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Coal ash is loaded with hazardous chemicals that needs to be carefully monitored and disposed of. Please develop appropria te regulations that will protect the well being of North Carolinians. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: F. Schlabach Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - H Q - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4001 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This is an extremely important issue. We destructive humans have already single handedly taken out many entire species from the face of the earth. When they are gone they are gone. We retarded humans have only been around a fraction of the time earth has existed. We don't own it. Let us take some positive actually productive steps for once. - thanks for reading Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Smelter Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4002 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a resident of this state for nearly 25 years, North Carolina is not just a place I live, it is my home. Please protect North Carolina for me, my family, an d all others who have made this state their home.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 482 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Milor Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4003 - A1 C omment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Alright. I'll keep this message short. My name is Ceylan and water is my favorite thing in the world. I love swimming, wave s, and just drinking it. When I heard abut toxic sludge being poured into the water that I love, I was furious. And probably after this next sentence, you'll probably just skip the rest of the message, but please don't. I'm eleven years old. All I want is to grow up with clean water in my life. At my school, the entire sixth grade is doing a project on water in other places in the world. Our research shows that 90% of those people in those other countries die of unclean water. Sooner or later, you probably will be drinking some of that toxic water yourself. I mean, seriously? How many people do you want to kill. Why can't adults just do the right thing for once?! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. L. Powell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4005 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I believ e requiring biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead can certainly help keep our waterways and underground water sources safe. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 483 Commenter Name: S. Bondurant Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4007 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. The Sutton Plant northwest of the city of Wilmington (where I live) burned coal for decades. I used to wake up in the morning to find a thin coating of gray ash on my sailboat, on my overturned canoe, on my kayak, on my lawn furniture, etc. etc. I fear for our health when I think of their dangerous ash wastewater being discharged in the Cape Fear. Please urge the EPA to g o with the STRONGEST rule to protect our health...and not be swayed by the lobbyists sent to persuade them that every - thing is just "hunky dory"...and that we need not be concerned...ha! Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the respon se to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Ingram - Edwards Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4009 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ext ernal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please do not get bought out by large energy companies. Stand up for the everyday people of North Carolina and do what is right for us and the environment. I have great respect for what the EPA has done in thepast and I know you will protect the waterways of North Carolina. The natural lands of North Carolina are one of our best assets and we need to preserve them. Please enact the strictest possible rules and regulations for all corporations tr ying to earn a profit at the expense of the environment. I know you will do what is right and I guarantee the people of North Carolina stand behind you. Thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 484 Comment er Name: B. Fleming Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4010 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Let's eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Let's treat smokestack scrubber sludge using zero - discharge systems, remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is sensible, affordable, and already being used by s ome coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives, prevent children from getting sick, and ensure our water is safe to drink and our fish safe to eat. It should be finalized and put into force as soon as possible. Comment Resp onse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Hostetler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4011 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Externa l Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: My name is Erin Hostetler. I have always felt a deep connection to the environment and especially to bodies of water. As an employee of a non - profit rafting and outdoor recreation s ite in Charlotte, North Carolina, spending hours out on the Catawba River, kayaking and paddle boarding. It is a beautiful body of water that deserves higher standards for keeping it clean so that more people will live healthier lives to be able to enjoy i ts beauty.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 485 I have also worked as an intern for an environmental non - profit in the mountains of North Carolina and have seen first hand the effects of coal ash pollution on various communities living near the power plants. I've been shocked as I learn more and more about the devastating reality of the situation. Therefore, I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. Limiting all power plant water pollution will greatly improve the health of our waterways, maki ng the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Kitch Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4012 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would like to voice my support for the Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach to coal ash disposa l. Please stop toxic coal plant discharge from poisoning our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Hunt Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 4013 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Keep our water fucking clean. I don't want any more e - mails from these assholes. Comment Response: See r esponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 486 Commenter Name: C. Christian Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4014 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ext ernal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, streams, and other bodies of water from toxic wastewater. Elimination of harmful substances in our Earth's water will not only improve the health of the earth and its support of all ecosystems, but the health and function of all its inhabitants as well. After all, dumping into rivers and oceans is no different than the chemical weapons being used in Syria. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Lugg Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4015 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater and all waste for that matter. Life needs clean water to live and we should no t put earth and all living things on earths health at risk! What is wrong with you people, why would polluting earths water be allowed to begin with! Put an end to pollution to our water, air and food!! What is wrong with you people who pollute life on ear th. Humanity should be your main concern! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Anonymous Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4016Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 487 Comment Exc erpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please enact the most stringent of the preferred alternatives for limiting the toxic effluents from Steam Electric power generating p lants. We have a real problem with this in the Southeastern US, including where I live, North Carolina. We are slowly poisoning the waters that we drink from. We can and must do better. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Barrow Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4017 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Clean Water Act set goals to eliminate releases of toxic substances into water by 1985. This is perfectly consistent with the EPA's purpose of protecting human health and the environment by writing and enforcing regulations based on such acts. Please make sure that your standards for power plants are written to limit these pollutants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Burazer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4019 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by im plementing the strongest safeguards possible. My home in Mount Holly, NC is just a few miles from the recently closed Riverbend coal - fired Steam Station owned by Duke Energy. The plant may not be belchingEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 488 greenhouse gases, but the coal ash waste ponds are hazardous to the health of man and marine life. Toxins continously leech into Mountain Island Lake -- our source of drinking water. It is time are for prudent regulations to be enacted. Duke Energy should not be left to monitor their own backyard. I have g ladly signed this petition because taking no action will let the inevitable diaster happen. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. French Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Con trol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4020 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need to keep our waters and lands clean. I am surprised those who wear the Am erican Flag on their lapel, find it so easy to dismiss our need for clean water, and clean environment. These people were blessed with millions, that they should use those millions to protect the waters, land, and air, unless they just wear those flags on their lapels, to garner votes. Such a sin, God the one these same people pretend to honor and praise, must be so hurt, that we look upon Gods gifts and treat them so shabby and with such disrespect. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Corlew Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4021 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respo nse: No Comment Excerpt: Even though I am only in high school, I have extensive knowledge of water quality and the preservation of wildlife. I understand that things need to be disposed of, but there are more efficacious was of disposal than simply dumpi ng into the water. Again I urge the EnvironmentalEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 489 Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Mayer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4023 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: ZERO tolerance would be best with on - land containment. I personally have suffered from mercury and aluminum poisoning. Doctors and dentists deny it is a problem (as well as most industries), but it is a real threat to our children's futures. There is NO EXCUSE for not making this a priority as these industries are profiting at our planet's expense. Don't let lobbyists and industry pressure the EPA into what is only benefits their GREED. Comm ent Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. M. Austell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4024 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: N o External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am not against the use of coal as a fuel but we can no longer emit the levels of particulate and heavy metals into the air or discharge water or even the amount of CO2 fr om the burning of coal. Solutions exist and must be implemented and regulated. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 490 Commenter Name: R. Klemmer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4025 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. If only for your safety let alone those of your family, your constituents who realize one cannot tolerate continuing contamination or our water supply. Endorse laws that address methods of removing hazardous coal ash. Make sure they ar e implemented at top speed. Vote to require coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, Thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Kardell Comment er Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4027 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to do their job! What's the point of establishing a new pollution standard if it won't clean up most or even all of the pollution! Plenty of coal - fired power plants already implement technology that keeps our waterways clean. Why shouldn't all coal - fired power plants be required to implement this technology by law? It won't cost consumers much energy, and from my experience as a canvasser with Clean Water Action, I know more people are concerned about their health than a couple extra bucks a month on their electric bill. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Paul Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 491 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4030 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Redundant verified Regulation is necessary & proven necessary & always has been. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Steege Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4031 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Don't let the EPA poison our bodies and our water! It's time we stop letting industry get away with using our waterways as their dumping grounds. Stand up them and protect our health for now and future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Jamie Rhodes Commenter Affiliation: Environment Council of Rhode Island Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4034 - A2 Comment Excerpt Number: 12 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: For decades, power plants have used our water resources as dumping grounds for their toxic wastewater while EPA and the states have turned a blind eye. Fortunately, treatment technologies are available tod ay that can achieve near zero discharge of pollution at a cost that is affordable to the industry as a whole. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 492 Commenter Name: J. Caldwell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4035 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communiti es by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. I lived within a mile of Marshall Steam Station on Lake Norman between 1966 and 1973 when I married and move away. Six out of seven members in my family who lived there too have been diagnosed and treat ed with some form of cancer. My father died at the age of 58 with brain cancer. When we left our home in the mornings our cars would be covered with coal ash. When you swept the pavement on our driveway you swept up coal ash. Now after all these years they have installed the million dollar purification system. Please stop the pollution of our rivers and lakes as well as our land where much of our food is produced as well. I support this petition with my whole being. Thank you for allowing me to voice my con cerns, Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Deal Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4036 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Fl ag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Because if this continues all the water ways will be d estroyed and or so completely polluted that no one will be able to use and enjoy them. Not only that but the natural wildlife will be destroyed as well. The ones in the water will be gone and the ones out of theEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 493 water as well. Also that will effect the fam ilies that survive off of hunting and fishing. Large companies need to be made responsible for their actions to pollute. A stand needs to be made today for the survival of all of our futures. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Hennessee Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4037 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Our state has too many coal energy plants, and all of them are making their surrounding area a mess of pollution. If this is not stopped, our drinking water will be so bad that we will not be able to use it. There are other reasons why coal is not acceptable, since we know what it causes and that there are other means of power generation than by coal that are so much cle aner. Please make the coal plants clean up their messes in the best way to take care of the enviroment around them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Thomas Commenter Affiliation: Priv ate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4038 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. I understand that our corporations need to be strong, but they can be both healthy business concerns and keepers of the health of their very customers. I find it ridiculous that our corporation s and even our government are inhumane and short sighted enough to sell out the health of our citizens in favor of corporate donations to campaignEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 494 coffers. What other possible reason could there be for allowing us to be made sick and even die because of pr eventable causes, in place so the corporations can make a buck and then use it to buy influence. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Barnhizer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docu ment Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4040 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I've learned from Clean Water Action about the issue of *waste from our local power plants being dumped* into water that supports life, and I have to wonder what environmental protection really means? If scientists at the EPA don't know the impact on flora and fauna of lead, mercury, selenium, etc., then the institution has f ailed. That these toxic chemicals are being added, knowingly, purposefully. To the water upon which we all depend, is criminal. Your job needs to be prevention, not reparation. Once our land, air and water are changed by added chemicals, it's impossible to bring the environment back to it's healthy state. * Why are the big polluters excused? Please fix this! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Dunn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen D ocument Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4041 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: PLEASE -- the Great Lakes are a vital resource. We have to keep them clean. I vote, I am active, I am going to be watching. Please don't let the power companies profit from the death of our lakes and rivers. Profit, fine, but factor in the ACTUAL costs. That includes cleaning up ALL of their mess.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 495 I urge EPA to finalize a s trong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: ent Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number : EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4042 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Here is an opportunity to do something for cleaner water. Limit toxic power plant pollution, t he largest source of water pollution in this country. These standards have not been updated since 1982. These proposed, long overdue Clean Water Act regulatory standards will limit the amount of toxic metals and other chemicals that are dumped into our wat erways from power plants. Although RI does not have any coal - fired plants, I am constantly reminded of these polluters as I drive over the Newport Bridge and to the north we see those cooling towers at Brayton Point in Swansea. Brayton Point discharges int o Mount Hope Bay, and 70% of the Mount Hope Bay is in territorial Rhode Island and it flows into the Narragansett Bay, directly down towards Newport and the open sea. Implement more protective measures to set discharge limits on mercury, lead and selenium. Choose Option 5 of the proposed regulations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. and P. Canning Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4043 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 496 Without abundant clean water we are doomed - all of us, young, old and in between. The issue is critical and clean wat er cannot be compromised by those polluters with deep pockets and special interests. While oversimplified this need cannot be overstated. Our water supply MUST be protected from polluters.....we rely on the EPA to do this. Comment Response: See response t o DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. and P. Canning Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4044 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Externa l Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge the EPA to issue rigorous, enforceable standards that will keep billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium from toxic power plant wastewater out of our rivers, lakes and streams. The vast majority of Americans support protecting our water, and no Congress would dare try to de - fund EPA for exercising its statutory authority. EPA regulates for the well - being of the commonwealth, so please keep attacking the toxic e xternalities coal plants leave us! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Tillman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4045 - A1 Comment Excerp t Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: CLEAR WATER IS OUR BASIC NATURAL RESOURCE AND ELEMENT OF OUR ECONOMY. POLLUTION OF WATER RESOURCES WILL NOT ONLY RUIN OUR ENVIRONMENT AN D THE HEALTH OF OUR PEOPLE BUT ALSO GREATLY WEAKEN OUR ECONOMY AND SECURITY. I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power p lants.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 497 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. German Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4046 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: IT IS ABOUT TIME YOU PEOPLE STARTED DOING SOMETHING TO REIGN IN THE DESTRUCTION BIG BUSINESS DOES TO OUR ENVIRONMENT. THESE PEOPLE HAVE GOTTEN AWAY WITH MURDER FOR D ECADES AND IT IS TIME TO PUT A STOP TO THIS IGNORANCE. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Hoop Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4047 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The American people desperately need federal standards to protect our water from unregulated power plants' emissions, w ith high levels of toxic pollutants such as lead, mercury, and arsenic. It is outrageous that the EPA has not done its job on this issue. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Sibel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4048 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 498 Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a str ong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. People also need to be conscious of what they are throwing in our waters as well as the plants. Not just calling the plants out, everyone needs to own up to their wrongful actions. Just remember, would you want to eat something that came out of your toilet? It is the same difference. When we pollute the waters, we contaminate what we eat. Please rethink what you are doing and spend the extra money to fix the issue. We all w ould really appreciate not drinking or eating contaminated food. Your attention to this matter is expected. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Center Commenter Affiliation: Private Citi zen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4049 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Ugh, millions of gallons of coal ash waste water and smokestack scrubber sludge in our water supply. I hate to think what this is doing to the health of humans and all other livings beings in the environment. That's why I strongly urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution stand ards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Hill Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4050 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am a father of two young boys, a resident of the Great Lakes state, and an environmental attorney.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 499 This summer I spent some of the BEST moments of my life with my sons on Lake Huron and the Au Sable River. Water pollution from power plants directly impacts our right to Clean Water. We are entitled to CLEAN, HEALTHY water. The fis h we eat and the water we drink and recreate in must be safe! Thank you for stopping unchecked pollution of our waters by implementing a strong set of rules for power plant water polluters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, E xcerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Levesque Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4051 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Keep your coal waste out of our water and if you don't think its hurting anything then I challenge you to drink the water you have dumped in!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commente r Name: L. J. Southerton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4052 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Water is our earth's most important resource. We can not make it unusable. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excer pt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 500 Commenter Name: J. Piscitelli Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4053 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No C omment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I have a baby and would like her to grow up in a safe, clean world. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Abrams Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4054 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respo nse: No Comment Excerpt: We want water that we can safely drink and swim in and let our children play in. I believe it is your job to write and enforce strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution, making the water we drink and the fish we e at safer for our health. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Reed Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4055 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am horrified by the lack of stringent laws to control water pollution by power plants.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 501 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2 265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Motzenbecker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4056 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Re sponse: No Comment Excerpt: As a life long resident of Michigan I have enjoyed immensely the lakes, rivers, and streams that comprise a portion of the Great Lakes watershed. I also drink and bathe in Great Lakes water every day. I urge the EPA to finaliz e a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. The thought of being exposed to these toxic pollutants scares me. This is water I drink and bathe in! It’s time to end this reckless practice. Comment Response: Se e response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Ventre Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4057 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: President Obama, most of the Senate and Congress and Governors are Christians. Christianity teaches that God created the natural world (garden of Eden) to last forever in the pure form that it was created. It is the responsibility of present day Christians to adhere to what their God's original plan was. Solar and wind can meet all of the earth's energy needs and do it with more harmony to the original garden of Eden. Christianity also believ es Jesus will return one day. Jesus would want to see the leaders honoring God's original plan for the garden of Eden. "If future generations are to remember us with gratitude rather than contempt, we must leave them something more than the miracles of tec hnology. We must leave them a glimpse of the world as it was in the beginning, not just after we got through with it." - President Lyndon B. Johnson, on signing the Wilderness Act of 1964Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 502 Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by imp lementing the strongest safeguards possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. French Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4058 - A1 Comme nt Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Are you considering the fact that you are now and will be poisoning your children, grandchildren and future generations with yo ur poisons being added to the ground water that we all consume? I hope so. Please do not dump your toxic waste into the ground and our water systems. Please finalize zero - discharge water pollution systems. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Y. Scott Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4059 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. As a coal miner's daughter, I know full well the health issues that result from this dirty industry. We no lon ger need coal; we have the ability and the technology to move beyond its use yet the detrimental affects to our environment and health will last for generations. Smarten up, turn a deaf ear to an industry that pollutes and vote FOR the people's health....F OR A CHANGE. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 503 Commenter Name: D. Potter Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4060 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External R eview Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Its only the right thing to do: Please, please, please finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Coal is dirty, very polluting and not needed - its old time, dir ty energy! At least require coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, the EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - dischar ge systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Wagner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4061 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finaliz e a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. This impacts me personally because I frequently fish in local lakes and get a fishing license every year. To not have harmful chemicals in our water and food source means life for my family. For everyone to have a good quality of life means there needs to be a standard to keep our water safe. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 504 Commenter Name: M. Brakeman Commenter Af

filiation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4062 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In a perfect world, all electric energy would be produced only through natural, clean means, converting natural, organic power resources into a form usable for a variety on non - natural applications. Until that dream becomes a reality, in the imperfect world we live in, Power plants should be req uired to use the best available technology when producing electricity to reduce the most amount of pollution. Some people still believe that natural resources in this country are so vast, we don't need to worry about defiling some of them, but I'm sure you know that those resources are quickly dwindling away. We can't let them disappear. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Perlman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Nu mber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4063 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I grew up in a coal - mining town in SW Virginia. My hometown, which I just recently visi ted, was almost unrecognizable to me as far as the "lay of the land" I was accustomed to. Everywhere I went, the beautiful farm - lands were totally demolished, including the beautiful farm my great - grandfather established. I can't even imagine how much tox ic waste is present in what is left of the original, untouched land in my hometown, but I sure would like to know. But the more worrisome issue is the coal ash billowing from it's huge chimney continually which is only four mile from my residence. So my re quest is for the EPA to do it's very best to implement the best plan possible to control coal ash at all facilities of this industry.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 505 Thank you and please do this !!!! We need to clean it up !! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 226 5, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Jackson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4064 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. i had to have a lung removed because of lung cancer i live close to progress energy i have had 4 dogs die with cancer 3 lung cancer i am sure it came from ash that use to cover our cars and decks my brother also had a lung removed at the age of 40 my mom died with cancer at age 45 i have 5 neighbors that died with cancer and another that has fought cancer for 10 years Comme nt Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Brennan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4065 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Coal ash plants sitting near our rivers poison our drinking water, contaminates groundwater, destroys wildlife habitat, increases the risk of flooding. What could be more important than protecting our drinking water. You can have all the money in the world, as these big companies do, but if you don't have your health, you have nothing. Please require and give authority to enforce the strictest regulations and monitoring of these coal ash plants. After all, our lives are depending on it! It’s time to end this reckless practice. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 506 Commenter Name: T. Deibert Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4066 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Existing guidelines have not kept up with developments in th e industry and North Carolina's communities and waterways are at risk of being further exposed to large and toxic amounts of coal ash. Industry needs to be held accountable for the waste they produce as we are all affected yet do not all have an equal voic e in keeping our resources safe from toxic chemicals. Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Comm enter Name: M. Sullivan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4067 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The re is no reason that the heaviest offenders of water pollution nation wide should receive special treatment. There are available, affordable technologies to eliminate most of the existing contamination. If strong limits are set for power plants regarding t heir toxic heavy metal leakage, it will be one of the largest improvements in our water quality since the Clean Water Act was passed. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Boalt Commenter A ffiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4068 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 507 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's fa milies and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. I want more clean energy in this state, in this country, and in this world. I want to outlaw dirty energy. Period. We need clean commerce, clean industry, clean opportunities. Today. Now. Not in 2015 or later. Now. What's the hold up? Big corporations? REally? That's bunk. Getover it. Truly. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Napier Commenter Affiliation: Private C itizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4069 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. We are blessed with beautiful rivers and waterways that provide municipal drinking water, natural aquatic ecosystems, and recreational spaces for us all to enjoy. I love North Carolina! Please eliminate any allowances for industries to use these waterways as waste systems. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Forsyth Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4070 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 508 Comment Excerpt: Please respect what we are asking as citizens of NC. We truly care about our state, our environment, nature and our future. Please stop toxic water pollution from coal fired power plants entering in our water ways or environment, period! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Lightfoot Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4071 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Keep the toxic by products o f coal mining out of our water. We need biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead from coal ash. The waters of North Carolina, and the people and wildlife that use them must be protected. Pleas e stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Melton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citi zen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4073 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Coal ash is poisoning the waters of the Yadkin. Of particular concern, in my area, is Buck Steam Plant....which I believe was thecause of the fish kill in the High Rock Lake Basin. It is unfortunate the test ing was not done.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 509 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Arbogast Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4074 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Ext ernal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. I was raised in the mountains of West V irginia and thoroughly understand the importance of coal to the economy and our infrastructure however this is a problem that demands more attention than that. We as a society can not allow our waters to be poisoned by toxins that destroy our environment a nd our family's health for generations to come. We must reduce this waste immediately and find healthier solutions to the issues that will allow not only our society to grow healthier but our economy to flourish by embracing the challenge of change and inn ovation as we move forward into this century! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Weaver Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4075 - A1 Comm ent Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am the father of two young children. And while I understand that they do not carry the political weight of deep - pocketed lobbyists, please remember my children, your children, and your grandchildren, and stand up for protections that will preserve our wonderful planet for generations to come. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Wolfgang Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 510 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4076 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. This sluge has to be dumped somewhere, and dumping it where the poor and disenfranchised live is no longer acceptable. Let's get rid of toxi c coal altogether instead of dumping it upon those who cannot afford to get away from it like we did with the problems with petroleum inhalants. Thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Kerr Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4077 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Please protect the earth and environment by all means and Please STOP ANY AND ALL FRACKING Fracking is the death of our planet!!!! Fracking will poison all the water,from the streams to rivers ,well and spring,any ground water as well as the coast and oceans . PLEASE STOP ALL FRACKING AND ANY THOUGHT OF FRACKING !!!!!!!!! OUTLAW FRACKING!!!!!!!!!!!! ANY BODY THAT THINKS FRACKING IS SAFE TO GO AND FRACK THEMSELVE S!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Comment Response:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 511 See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. The remainder of this comment concerning hydrofracking is outside the scope of this particular rulemakin g. Commenter Name: K. Murray Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4079 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt : Clean water and healthy riparian ecosystems are extremely valuable portions of our economies and our health. Lets keep our freshwater clean. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Booker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4081 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North C arolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Many of us here in our state are very proud of the abundant natural resources which North Carolina has become known for by many fellow Americans. One of our main sources for income in this state is tourism. Tourism which exists because we have many beautiful waterways, rivers, lakes and streams kept clean in large part due to the diligence of our population most of which feel we have a natural and national treasure in our midst. We need as much help as possible from everyone in our country and especially the EPA which has shouldered the efforts to help keep our country as clean as possible. The theories on short - term gain which have become typical from a contingency of busi ness leaders must be averted to save the long term health of folks here in North Carolina, as well as fellow Americans and the great natural gift we are to maintain as stewards of the land. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, E xcerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 512 Commenter Name: K. McCord Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4082 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Okay, you of all organizations know what could be done reasonably - for cleaner water and bearable costs. Please do right. You are charged with protection of our environment, Please do that. People at coal plants have kids and grandkids, too. Once certain chemicals are in the water it's nearly impossible or reasonable to get them out. Let's not let it get there. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Warner Commenter Affili ation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4083 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We all need water to live. Polluting any wat er source is illogical and unethical. All humans, and all other living creatures, deserve the right to clean water. We were all taught about the water cycle when we were very young so we all know that the water cycle is infinitely connected. If you poison one source, it can and will easily poison other sources. This can happen because of runoff or by seeping into the groundwater or though any other part of the cycle. Because we know how the water cycle works, we should be doing all that we can to protect th is innately life giving resource. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 513 Commenter Name: D. Little Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4084 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Coal is the dirtiest power source, polluting air, land and water. The earth is in crisis and the U.S. needs to step up NOW to protect it (and to undo the harms of the Bush administration). Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.

. Commenter Name: R. Tran Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4085 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please, do not let polluters continue polluting our water. Our most basic natural resources, water and air, cannot be polluted. Polluting with harmful chemicals is ultimately hypocritical. We are only doing it to ourselves! Once again, please, fight this pollution and all pollutions. THANK YOU FOR YOUR WORK!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Carothers Commenter Affiliat ion: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4086 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 514 Obtaining clean drinking water has been a high priority fr me for the last decade. I support a balanced approach to companies developing opportunities for industrial growth and environmentalists seeking to protect our land and water. That said, not much supercedes our need for truly safe, clean water. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Smith Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4087 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Anyone who has ever been a child or raised one knows about setting good boundaries, and that poor boundaries invite being taken advantage of. The boundaries on the power companies have been lax long enough. Please take action to reform the rules governing power plant water pollution! Comment Response: See respons e to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Kemeny Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4091 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Rev iew Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I'm surprised everyone doesn't feel that clean water should be protected; we all drink it. It seems so obvious! Who wants their children to drink arsenic, mercury, lead, or any other similar contaminant s? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 515 Commenter Name: R. Barr Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4092 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Look, I'm not anti - business. If power plants have to increase their costs in order to adhere to environmental regulations, then they can pass those costs on to consumers. Maybe then we'll all try harder to conserve energy! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Harris Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4093 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: How can we be a strong nation when citizens are dying of cancer, as a result of America's polluted water and soil? Do the right thing - make it illegal for companies to dump toxic chemicals into our waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Pennell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Contr ol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4094 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am for everything that helps protect the Great Lakes, which is an international treasure.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 516 It's past time to do the right thing. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Herbers Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4095 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the Environmental Protection Agency: NO TOXIC CHEMICALS SHOULD BE ALLOWED! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Miller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4096 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Stop power plants from dumping toxic chemicals into our water. We must end plant water pollution TOD AY! What kind of future are we leaving our children and grandchildren??????? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Laura Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EP A - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4097 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 517 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Self Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4098 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Honestly, "safer" isn't enough! It's way past time that polluter's w ere held accountable...that companies stopped thinking only of themselves and the "bottom line" of their financial statements. I doesn't matter how many "jobs" will be created or lost. If we don't have clean air to breath and clean water to drink, there wo n't be anyone to fill the positions. I trust that corporate karma will ultimately catch up with offenders, but I prefer to see grace and good judgement bring all into balance. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Canon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4099 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 518 I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Just a personal note, since this is a CWA standard email: please take action to protect our water and our children. As population increases, power production increases, pollution increases. Eventually, we die. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Driscoll Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4100 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I live in Michigan and am concerned with the apparent limited protection our fresh water is receivin g. Please act to ensure this protection for our lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Miller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Doc ument Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4101 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and s treams from toxic power plant wastewater. When in college in West Michigan I enjoyed going to the beach but not near where the power plant discharged their water. I liven on the Huron River and own a home on Lake Huron. Keep our water clean! Comment Respon se: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 519 Commenter Name: H. Squires Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4102 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Re view External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please do something about the vast amounts of poisons that flow into our lakes, streams and rivers from power plants. You have the power to require zero - discharge water pollution standards that will limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Coal plants can move their hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water. The EPA can stop millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewa ter from getting into our water supplies every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems. At the very least the companies could use biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Mills Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4103 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I understand citizens want cheaper power, and that power companies want to make a profit. Where those goals get in the way of the health and safe ty of the public is where we, and especially EPA, have to draw the line. Our present and future health depends on what we allow to pollute our earth today, and we must draw the line now. Power companies might make less profit, but they will figure out a wa y to increase efficiency because of controls on emissions. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 520 Commenter Name: I. Klink Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4104 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water should be the EPA's highest priority. What would be best is for power plants NOT to pollute our water in the first place! It’s time to end the reckless abandon with which power plant dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. Enforced standards to limit all power plant water pollution must come about. The U.S. gover nment needs to give EPA enforcement the teeth it needs to make power plants comply o they will continue to defile our waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Streeter Commenter Affili ation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4105 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to prot ect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Please don't delay any longer. We need to act now to save our earth, protect our health and save our country millions of dollars for health care. Billions of pounds, and we know what lead alone does to our health, let alone arsenic! I can't believe we have let this go on for so long! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 521 Commenter Name: K. Chen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4106 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and stream s from toxic power plant wastewater. As a citizen of the United States, I think that water is a vital resource that needs to be protected. Clean water is important to me and my children. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exce rpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Karra Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4107 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I sincerely urge your agency, the Environmental Protection Agency, to finalize a strong, enforceable rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants *MUST* be required to use all available te chnologies to reduce and eventually eliminate pollutive discharges. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Nyland Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4108 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 522 I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We need to stop water contamination NOW!! Companies have to change their attitude towards making a few less dollars and make sure they are not polluting water and soil for future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Bosetti Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4109 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporat ed into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This is a personal issue for me, since I enjoy swimming in lakes, rivers, and streams. Unfortunately, the bodies of water nearest to my home are all polluted from the dumping of previous decades. Please take action t o stop even more waterways around the country from becoming polluted. It is not appropriate to give power plants a pass. If the technology exists to reduce their pollution, they should be forced to use it. This is especially troublesome because all of us d rink from these same rivers, particularly in the West. Thank you for considering my comments, and I eagerly await the good news of common - sense restrictions. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Nam e: R. Taylor Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4110 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 523 I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Unless they do so, the costs of this pollution is borne by the ellast able to pay for it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Ex cerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Metcalf Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4111 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No C omment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We ALL live on this planet together...please remember, "THE FROG DOES NOT DRINK UP THE POND IN WHICH HE LIVES..." Native American proverb.. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Gedra Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4112 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Exter nal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Michigan must send a strong mes sage by strengthening the standards on power plant pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 524 Commenter Name: S. Gellert Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4113 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. Just because we think we really need the energy they generate (and we could do with much less!) does not give them a free pass to pollute our environment, water and ground alike. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Graves Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4114 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respo nse: No Comment Excerpt: I demand that the EPA finalize an ironclad rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It’s time to end this shortsighted, cruel, and needless practice.

- ha! ha! I don't eat fish anymore -- h ow's that for negative impact on the business community! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Abrahamson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 08 19 - 4115 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 525 Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer....making this planet safer for us now and for future generations. The time is now to stop the pollution! the time is now to be the change. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Fisher Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4117 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I implore the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Lamarca Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4118 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water, not oik, is our most valuable resource. Our health and innate intelligence are more important than money. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 526 Commenter Name: A. Pellerito Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4119 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I live on Lake St.Clair and swim, fish, skate and share it all with my neighbors, friends, kids and grandkids. I'm 66. Addison and Mathew are 3 and 7 mos. Don't do it for me, do it for them. Please. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Hafer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4120 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Every year the inci dent of cancer and other previously rare diseases continues to rise. The problems can be attributed to the toxins and carcinogens in the water, among other things, that we consume. Businesses can weaken this process by reducing all forms of pollution. I ur ge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Haynes Commenter Affiliation: Private Cit izen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4122 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 527 As the population grows and requires more drinking water, we ne ed to insure that there is enough safe, clean water to meet our needs. We are already seeing that uncontrolled pollution has had a negative effect on our global water sources. We need to lead by example and strengthen our anti - pollution regulations. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Velwest Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4124 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. This is one of many examples of energy companies externalizing costs to keep their prices low. A strong rule will reduce these externalities and produce a fair marketplace where the best (lowest total co st, safest, most reliable) energy technologies will win. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Lukasiewicz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 4127 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is sensible, affordable and already being us ed by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water is essential. It must be finalized and put into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 528 Commenter Name: E. Edgett III Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4128 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I worked on the publicity campaign for the original Section 2 Citizen's Input just after the Clean Water Act was passed. It's criminal that these standards have still not been met. I haven't participated in public protest for a long time. Maybe it's time for me to come out of retirement? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Reeves Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4129 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have children and we live near a coal - fired powe r plant, so I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Danforth Commenter Affiliat ion: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4131 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 529 I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protec t our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. The downstream health costs will be staggering compared to the changes needed to prevent the problems it initiated now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Phillips Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4132 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We cannot reasonably allow the pollution of our water and that of our children and grandchildren at such a rate! Comment Re sponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Aschheim Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4133 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Externa l Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is utterly scandalous that every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It’s time to end this reckless practice. H uman beings and other living things need strong standards to limit a power plant water pollution! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 530 Commenter Name: M. Kooistra Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docum ent Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4134 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Having seen with my own eyes how our precious water sources have been made unusable, I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Gerritt Commenter Affili ation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4135 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to prot ect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I live in a very urban and polluted watershed. We need cleaner rivers for healthier communities. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commen ter Name: W. Cleveland Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4137 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our streams and rivers have reached unhealthy pollution levels to the point of being dangerous. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 531 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. White Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4138 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into R esponse: No Comment Excerpt: With every passing year, potable water becomes a rarer resource, and yet it is fundamental to life on earth. Now it is up to the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Lytle Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4139 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Revi ew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I understand that these plants are responsible for literally billions of pounds of pollutants, some of which are highly toxic such as arsenic. Please implement a strong rule to limit these discharges and protect our water resources. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Mark D. (no surname provided) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Contr ol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4141 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 532 Every year, existinng regulations permit these plants to dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It’s time to end this suicidal recklessness. Strong, enforced standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, helping to make the water we all dep end on safe for life. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Moldover Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4142 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It’s time to control this practice m ore effectively for the common good. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Green Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4143 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please have the EPA finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards so the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our streams a nd rivers from power plants must be limited. To limit dangerous ash wastewater, hazardous coal ash should be moved with dry systems, not with water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 533 Commenter Name: B. Pas icznyk Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4146 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the Environmen tal Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. If our water is unsafe how can we ever be safe anywhere? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Mironov Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4147 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I wanted to ask EPA to make sure that the new rule doesn't allow our rivers and lakes to be polluted by waste from power plants. The waste needs to be cleaned up to adhere to strong standar ds. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. H. (no surname provided) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4149 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Ex ternal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Can the Environmental Protection Agency finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into o ur waters from power plants. This or something better for the highest good.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 534 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Marquez Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4150 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standard s to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Please consider finalizing this a priority! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Baker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4151 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I really believe we have to work hard as a society to preserve and conserve our natural resources

- they are vulnerable to grave harm from toxic power plant wastewater, and the EPA needs to help protect our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. S. Smith Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4152 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerp t:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 535 Strengthened standards are long overdue and essential to protect our water resources and river ecosystems. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Gagne Commenter Affiliation: Private Ci tizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4153 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Whenever we have a chance to prevent pollution, we should take the opportunity. We should certainly enact laws that compel coal companies to take responsibility for wrecking mountains and putting toxic waste in streams - they must return land and streams to their original state. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Stolen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4154 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incor porated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I spend a large amount of my time paddling the rivers and lakes of MN and do not want to see them polluted. Please do everything you can to protect our waters. For example, please create and enforce strong standards for our power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Merkle Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4155 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 536 I love Michigan and wish to ensure that all of our state's natural resources will be enjoyed by my grandchildren and great grandchildren i n the years to come. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Hammond Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4156 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Ex ternal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should not be allowed to pollute our waterways or our air! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: V. Hari Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4157 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to introduce strong standards to reduce pollution of our water bodies by the discharge of various poisonous pollutants by power plants all across the country. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Doerr Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4158 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 537 P lease stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. The Earth was not given to us to destroy. We were given brains for research and creativity and we were given families to care for. Why would we not use the knowledge we gain to protect our health, homes and families? Please finalize this rule to strengthen and safeguard our environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Ogburn C ommenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4159 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I grew up beside the Catawba River, and every meal we'd have to wipe the coal ash off the table before we sat down to eat together. Currently there are multiple varieties of fish considered unsafe to eat living in the river, and my father worries about the safety of the water for swim ming. For the record, this is the same water that is the drinking water source for the city of Charlotte. We are fortunate in that we have well water. Your citizens, the children of the country, deserve better, and you have the power to effect change that will help make a difference. Please consider implementing these standards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Jackson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4160 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Coal Ash is so poisonous that I lost my Uncles, and Cousin's who worked in this field for years to take care of their families at their prime age of 50 and the oldest 65 years old. The Arsenic, Mercury, Lead and other metals with in th e Mines, and what comes out of the smoke stacks is just as poisonous as digging for it in the mines. New alternative energy is required for the future of this country no longer are we in need of Oil, and Coal.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 538 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Zaremba Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4162 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. I would love to be able to eat the Fish that we catch when we go Fishing but I won't, we catch and release b/c of the pollution. It not only effects our Family but also our wildlife. We already have to many species that are now extinct, please stop this practice before we lose more native Birds, Frogs, Fish etc. I want my Grandchi ldren and Great Grandchildren to be able to enjoy our Lakes and Rivers in years to come. Take a stand against any and all pollution, NOW !!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Ganong Comm enter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4163 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: EPA's proposal to begin making t hese crucial upgrades is ready to move forward. Thank you in advance for helping EPA issue the strongest possible proposed limits, and for working to get them final, fast, to protect our communitites. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Heiser Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4165 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Resp onse: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 539 Comment Excerpt: Without some help, we are in deep trouble... And our state seems to be doing all it can to insure we will live in as much toxic waste as possible... Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Otten Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4166 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's and the rest of America's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. The power industries need to bear the full responsibility for their pollution, and not pass the buck to our taxpay ers and communities. This will also level the playing field, so there is better competition with alternative energy sources that do not create these problems. Thank you for your service to our country and our environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Carl Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4167 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Inc orporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. The fact that nobody near these plants drops over dead immediately doesn't mean that the ash is not very dangerous. The medical costs needed to treat the illnesses that are likely caused by coal dust need to be factored into the equation when deciding how clean an environment we can "afford". Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 540 Commenter Name: B. Curlin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4168 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. The toxic elements in coal ash, including selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lea d find their way into our water tables and local waterways, including lakes and ponds. The use of dry systems, in place of the wet slurry systems that coal plants typically use could eliminate ash wastewater. Treating smokestack scrubber sludge using zero - discharge systems would also limit or eliminate most of the toxins presently associated with sludge disposal. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. DiCarlo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4169 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communitie s by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. Our water, land, and the health of our citizens are the most important resources we have - they should be protected at all cost. There are better ways of doing business and allowing pollution of our reso urces in the creation of others is unacceptable! Keep businesses responsible for doing their business without harm to the rest, and any associated costs with doing things the right way should be a cost of their business. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Yoskowitz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4171 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 54 1 Comment Excerpt: I live in Pennsylvania, where every power plant in my area; The Portland in Northampton, PA has a NPDES Permit that EXPIRED 7/15/2007, and where no pollutants are monitored and no pollutants have discharge limits. The Northampton Generating Plant in Northampton, PA has a NPDES Permit that expires 6/2/2015, where no pollutants are monitored and there are no limits on pollutant discharge, and they intend to keep polluting for the next two years!!! The Northea stern Power Co in Schuylkill, PA with a NPDES permit that expires 1/31/204 where no pollutants are monitored and there are no limits on pollutants discharge. The Wheelabrator in Frackville, PA where the NPDES permit expires 9/30/16 and where no pollutants are monitored and no limits exist on pollution discharges, deadly pollutants such as arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, iron, mercury, and zinc to name a few. I could go on and on. This kind of irresponsibility only makes for an angry citizenship. W e pay taxes, we pay our bills, and what do we get for it? poisoned water. END POWER PLANT POLLUTION NOW !!!!!!!!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Westervelt Commenter Affiliation: P rivate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4173 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I live in Lacey Township NJ and the local Oyster Cree k Nuclear Plant was forced to shut down or install cooling towers for there waste water which was non hazerdous. When it is obvious that this is a true health hazard, what are you deliberating? All must be treated equal and if we must lose our local plant so must other toxic plants shut down or come up to a level where they no longer polute! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 542 Commenter Name: D. Lutz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Nu mber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4174 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is so sad to me that I have to keep sigining online petitions and submitting public comments on issues such as clean water. We shoul not be polluting our natural resources, especially just to make a profit. Now that we know the damage we have done we should be doing everything in our power to undo that damage, not keep allowing already we althy companies to keep getting wealthy off the destruction of the planet. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Schuyler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4175 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants are our biggest industrial water polluters and they have the weakest water pollution standards. I urge you to require power plants to use the best available technology to reduce the amount of pollution by a specified amount for the next 5 years; e.g., 20% in year 1, 15% in year 2 and 10% for the remaining years. . Every year these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. This practice has caused poor water quality , lose of fo od and jobs and increased diseases. It is time to act. Stronger standards are needed for all power plants to limit their water pollution which in turn will protect this countries waterways. If we don't do it now, it may be too late. Without stronger rules, we will not be able t o provide clean water to our communities, maintain jobs for watermen, increase the population of non - contaminated fish and seafood for our consumption, provide safer beaches and water for swimming and recreation as well as decrease di seases associated with polluted waterways. Without it our future generations will be denied one of the essentials of life, clean water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 543 Commenter Name: Shellie Chard - McClary Commenter Affiliation: Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4181 - A2 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: N o Comment Excerpt: Technology - based controls represent a fundamental and core aspect ofthe CWA, which have led to many of the water quality successes we see today. Much of the CWA's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program's succes s for both direct and indirect discharges has been supported by ELGs. As noted in the proposed rule, discharges of toxic pollutants from Steam Electric Power Generating facilities contribute to the total toxic discharges to surface waters in the Un ited States. While DEQ supports EPA's rulemaking to update this rule, we are providing the following comments to assist EPA in the adoption of revised rules to address this industrial sector Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Shellie Chard - McClary Commenter Affiliation: Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4181 - A2 Comment Excerpt Number: 5 External Review Flag: No External Re view External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Many states support a Dry Handling standard for Fly Ash, as proposed in six of the eight options in the proposed ELG, including all four "preferred options." Comment Response: See resp onse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Gupton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4187 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External R eview Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 544 New Effluent Limitation Guidelines need to set a standard for zero discharge of toxic heavy metals to the waters that communities nationwide depend on for drinking, fishing and recreation. Water pollu tion from coal - fired power plants is a huge problem in the Southeast, where over 450 coal ash dumps scattered throughout the region contain 118 billion gallons of the toxic waste. That’s enough to cover 275,000 football fields one foot deep. Today’s power plant water pollution standards are woefully out of date, and 4 out of 5 plants lack any limits on the toxic metals they are allowed to emit. There are several known cases where this wastewater is discharged directly into drinking water reservoirs such as Mountain Island Lake in Charlotte, NC. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 . Commenter Name: J. Dodenhoff Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4188 - A1 Comment E xcerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Americans have always used the freedoms we're granted to innovate and succeed whatever the circumstances. We can continue to prospe r without relying on technology that destroys, rather than utilizes and sustains, our natural resources. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It’s time to end this reckless practice. Thank you for your consideration. I have faith that EPA will use its power to protect Americans and our waters so we can continue to prosper in coex istence with our natural environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Howard Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4189 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 545 I still think that in this day and age we should know better than to be doing such things as Mountaintop Removal Mining, or Fracki ng or a host of other activities that make a mess of suface waterways, underground aquifers and the land, kills wildlife and plants and leave a big toxic mess. Bad Ideas. I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Morian Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4190 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writig to persuade the EPA to issue final discharge water pollution standards that set levels for toxic metals power plants can discharge into the waterways. The EPA should require coal plants to use dry systems to move coal ash rather than polute our waters with toxic ash waste water. These matters require the EPA's immediate attention to p revent harm to children and wild life. Please make this a priority. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Berman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 4191 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: There are so many environmental ills that are contributing to our cancers and other illnesses. Please fin alize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 546 Commenter Name: L. Fleming Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4192 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need to be able to trust the water we drink. Water is the basis of all li fe here on earth. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Rapp Commenter Affili ation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4193 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: WE DESPERATELY NEED zero - discharge water pol lution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals allowed into waste waters from power plants. PLEASE MAKE THE COAL POWER PLANTS EXCRETE THE COAL ASH AS DRY WASTE RATHER THAN AS AQUEOUS WASTE DUMPED INTO OUR ENVIRONMENT!!!!! Comment Response: See respo nse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. D. Beck Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4194 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing in support of Carl Dale Beck's comments urging the EPA to enact stronger effluent limitation guidelines.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 547 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 . Commenter Name: J. Benjamin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4197 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt : Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. As an advocate in the fight agains t cancer, I am particularly appalled by this reckless practice, which must end now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Sterner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Num ber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4198 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I realize that stronger regulations may have the effect of raising costs and prices. But if we don't pay the price NOW, future generations will have to pay a much worse price! So act now! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Smith Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docume nt Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4199 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA needs to finalize its stance and policies to protect our rivers, l akes and streams from harmful power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 548 Power plants should be required to use the cleanest technology to reduce the amount of pollution running into our waterways. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of dangerous and harmful che micals into the waters we drink from and it’s time to put an end to it. We as a nation will benefit greatly form cleaner waterways, both economically and in health. Please put an end to toxins polluting our rivers . Comment Response: See response to DCN E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Mathur Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4200 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpo rated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We are in the future going to face multiple challenges to our drinking water supply such as drought and flooding. Every drop need to be conserved for our future needs. The last thing we need are deliberate actions by the industry that reduces the drinkable water supply. Stopping this now ensures we have more clean water for our future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Litten Commente r Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4201 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Clean Water Act was enacted to end the practice of using our waterways as convenient, free disposal for industrial wastes. The current situation in the electric power industry is one that the Clean Water Act should remedy with strict standards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Witt - Johnson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4202 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 549 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Inc orporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have seen the water in the lakes and streams change drastically over the years due to pollution. We can no longer swim in our local lakes and the life in the streams is dying. The B C Cobb plant has been pol luting the area for years. Please put in controls on power plants to save our fresh water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Wyaff Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Contro l Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4203 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA has got to finalize a strong rule to protect our country's rivers, lakes, a nd streams from toxic power plant waste water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. B. Mullins Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4205 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please save our most valuable asset here in America - water. Between fracking, power plants, chemical dumping big industries, we are poisoning America. Even bottled water will disappear. We can't e eat gold, silver, fuel oil, etc., or drink nuclear waste water - we need pure clean water. Use your brain - not political pocket books.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 550 Comment Response: See response to D CN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Voit Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4213 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incor porated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am from Michigan, where water seems plentiful but I have lived in the West so I understand how critical it is to protect this vitally important national treasure. I worry about a future where our generation wi ll be blamed for poisoning the earths water in our tunnel vision towards "cheap" power. Please consider the true cost of pollution in your economic considerations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commente r Name: J. King Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4214 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Make the po wer plant companies that dump mercury as well as other harmful chemical straight into our waters to change their ways. Don't let them take the cheapest route. Make them take the cleanest route. They can take those huge profits and invest into technology to help protect our environment. Some day we will realize how precious our water ways are. Is that here yet? Or will it be too late when it is? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Slowey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4215 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 551 Let us think 20years down th e road...actions we take now sometimes take many years to make improvements. Water is an essential ingrediant to all of us. This is why I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Mubeaied Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4216 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Exte rnal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Please think of the health of our children and families. It is ti me to stand together and set high standards for the good of all. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Rappaport Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 4217 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: A was appalled when I recently learned that power plants have the weakest water pollution standards of al l industries. I ask that the EPA rectify this situation by finalizing a rule that requires power plants to use the "best available technology", i.e. the technology that provides the largest amount of reduction in their water pollution. For the sake of our drinking, swimming, and fishing, we must end the irresponsible practice of allowing these plants to dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, selenium and mercury into our surface waters every year. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 552 Commenter Name: R. Dennis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4218 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respon se: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. It is said that one of the "benifis" of coal as a energy source is that it is "inexpensive" as in " cheap coal". Well, there are substantial additional cost that don't get calculated in to coal use that should be. Realistic clean up cost is just one. Damage to the enviroment and to peoples health are expensive cost that don't get added to the use of coal, but it needs to be. Will this cost more? Of course it will, thats the point! Coal companies, and their backers need to start paying a "honest, fair" cost to use this dirty, unhealthy "source of energy". Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 08 19 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Adrian Noble Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4219 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Re sponse: No Comment Excerpt: There are several waters around where I live in PA where the fish have so much mercury in them that they are unsafe to eat. You can help change this by finalizing a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from tox ic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Mc Quaid - Forsman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4220 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 553 I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Please. common se nse should prevail Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Garside Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4221 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Exte rnal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of po unds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It’s time to end this reckless practice; and to mitigate these poisonous heavy metals damaging our life - sustaining fresh water & coming up the food chain to ALL of us. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Parker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4222 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Extern al Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Given the fact that we can't live without CLEAN water, it seems reasonable to require power plants to use what science has made possible to keep our water safe. This is a cost of doing business an d the alternative is harm that can't be undone ---- polluted water. Please impose the restrictions our grandchildren and their grandchildren will appreciate. Truly. Look ahead. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 554 Commenter Name: B. G. Vinson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4223 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Exce rpt: As a concerned citizen, taxpayer, and healthcare provider, I strongly urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power pla nts. We as a nation cannot afford the economic and environmental costs of continuing to allow pollution of our waterways and aquifers. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Owens Commenter A ffiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4224 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I've heard of "grandfather" clauses in legislation that allow already existing situations to continue unchanged when new legislation mandates new standards. But just how long do these old systems get a free ride? Power companies who rely on coal need to change with the times. They've had it the ir way long enough! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Learner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4227 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 555 I have recently learned of the new water quality standards that you hope to place on coal - fired power plants. This action is extremely important. Our planet's and our country's clean fresh water supply is the number one need and priority for life on Earth. Threats to this resource must not be allowed and must be reversed. Your initiative is greatly appreciated by many people. Comment Response: See res ponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Scoville Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4228 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Externa l Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA has a moral duty to protect America's natural resources from those who seek to profit at the expense of our citizens' health and our nation's future. Please continue to stand up for the rig hts of all Americans. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Lang Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4230 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Exte rnal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Thank you for your work in protecting our natural resources; I am hopeful that the EPA will continue to work to ensure a healthier environment and future for my children. I am writing today to express my support for strict water pollution regulations that prohibit or extremely limit the amount of metals, toxins, and other wastes into our lakes, rivers and other waterways. I urge you to finalize a strong ru le that protects human health over corporate interests. Power plants should be prohibited from dumping these toxins into our environment. At the very least, they should be required to use the best technology available to "dry handle" waste from fly and bot tom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for scrubber sludge waste. This "zero liquid discharge" technology will eliminate release of the most highly contaminated wastewaters entirely.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 556 Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the re sponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Syrett Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4231 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need clean water; in fact that is one of the issues that caused the EPA to be formed. Please continue the mission and insure our rivers and lakes are not polluted by power plants. Comment Respons e: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Nelson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4232 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Revie w External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surfa ce waters. Existing technology can easily solve this problem. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Ann Pastore Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 4233 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 557 LOOK WHAT'S HAPPENED TO THE OIL AND FRACKING COMPANIES IN THE COLORADO FLOODS. WE DON'T EVEN KNOW THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGES YET ! AMERICAN'S WILL CHANGE THIS GOV. AND YOU'LL BE OUT OF A JOB IF YOU DON'T GET YOUR PRIORTIES RIGHT, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standards to lim it the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, the EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every ye ar. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is sensible, affordable and already being used by some coal plants. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save lives, prevent children from getting sick and make our water safer to drink and our fish safer to eat. It should be finalized and put into force as soon as possible. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Hopwood Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen D ocument Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4234 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA must act on power plant water pollution in order to protect y our waterways . Allowing the coal industry to dump millions of pounds of toxic waste into your rivers and streams is simply unacceptable Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Sabo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4235 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 558 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is unbelievable that currently powe r plants can spew billions of pounds of toxic chemicals into our rivers, lakes and streams, poisoning the water for humans and wildlife, alike, AND there are NO federal standards to stop polluters from doing this! Do the right thing and live up to your nam e: "Environmental Protection." Protect our waterways and begin the process of bringing the contaminated streams and rivers back to health. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Katrinak Comm enter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4236 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should have the sam e constraints placed on them as other businesses and individuals have when it comes to what can be placed in the soil, water and air. We know that many of these pollutants are the cause of cancer, asthmas and other ailments. The EPA needs to place the stro ngest standards possible and meet the goal of eliminating ALL water pollution. People depend on their government to protect them. It is one of the most important functions of government. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exce rpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Cameron Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4238 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comm ent Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 559 I view these rights as self - evident, and I am wondering why I have to ask you to gr ant them. I urge you to take action now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Emmons Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4239 - A1 Comment Ex cerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This pollution of our waters will not only affect our families, it will have a detrimental health affect on your families, as well. It's time the Power Plants take responsibility for their reckless actions and clean up their act. Our children's future and health depend on this common sense move on their part. Let's begin to be responsible for the environment and for the people inhabiting this beautiful earth. that we were given. The Indians were in tune with Mother Nature's gifts, let's try to follow their example by not destroying these natural gifts. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Singer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4240 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: There is NO EXCUSE why power plants do not use the best available technology to reduce the billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium they dump into surface waters. It’s time to end this reckless practice. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Malecki Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docum ent Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4241 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 560 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: There is no question that action is required immediately. There are no pr os and cons to weigh. Ending power plan pollution is 100% a positive move. Please do not leave yet another mess for our children to fix. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Hayes Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4242 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plant wastewater contains toxic metals like arsenic, boron, cadmium, selenium, lead and mercury. Exposure to these harmful metals can cause birth defects, cancer and other health problems. • Right now, more than 23,000 miles of rivers and streams are contaminated with power plant wastew ater. • It is also unsafe to eat fish in 38% of our nation’s surface waters because of these toxic discharges, which accumulate up the food chain. • There are numerous documented cases of environmental damage from coal ash wastewater discharges and spills, such as groundwater and surface water contamination and fish kills. • Despite the extent of this pollution problem, nearly 70% of coal plants in the United States currently have NO limits on the amount of toxic metals they are allowed to dump in our water . It is outrageous that this is allowed. I urge you to take regulatory action to stop the dumping of these toxins into our rivers and streams. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Gillespie Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 561 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4243 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Being a West Virginia resid ent, I do not want my water and air polluted for a coal company to make profit without heed of the health of people living here! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Jacklyn Commenter Affil iation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4244 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Come on! Do the right thing here - for YOU, for US. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Grodzinsky Commenter Affiliati on: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4246 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I have three small children, and I desperately want to be able to tell them that the government bodies designed to protect the public do in fact protect us. We all deserve the right to clean water. People should come before corporations, and the government of the people should enforce the rules made to protect the public.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 562 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Kuczynski Commente r Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4247 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. There is not way i would allow my family and friends to drink the water from my tap. You need to do something to fix this soon. We are all going to die diseased!!!! Comment Respon se: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: V. Gotaskie Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4249 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Re view External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA can insure that are waterways are protected from pollution from power plants. We depend on them to keep our water supplies safe, and ensure clean habitats for fish and other wil dlife. Our lives and those of future generations depend on having clean water available for all. You must protect this life sustaining resource. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Wysocki Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4250 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 563 P.S. Please, Administrator, McCarthy, I do realize that coal is a Major Basic of America's energy production ability, but, despite, the likely cost increase of advanced safety measures, and, their use, the increases must be allowed, even welcome, to insure our future generations hea lth, greater safety, and prosperity! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Ross Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4251 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: If reigning in the environmental externalities of our electricity use leads to higher prices, so be it. Better to subsidize electricity fo r the poor than allow everyone to consume willy nilly. (That said, increasing competition and cutting any excessive profits of fossil fuel companies would be ideal, as well.) Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1 . Commenter Name: M. Desanti Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4253 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Up until about I day ago I never even knew this, I thought that was illegal. THIS SICKENS ME and energy companies need to get their HEADS OUT OF THIER ASSES spend some money, they have plenty of it, and make this right. Do you people realize how shortsighted this is? Do these people have any idea of what you're actually doing? The damage they're doing is not going to go away, they're ruining the planet for everyone and the future. THIS MUST STOP NOW!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. and L. Adams Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4254 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 564 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpo rated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Why is the power industry not taking the lead in this matter? Do they think that we are not aware that they choose to put profits before people. If so, let's set them straight. The health of our planet and all lif e on it depends upon our taking responsibility for our actions. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Gray Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 08 19 - 4256 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA's special and critical role has for years been undermined by the interests of large corporations at the expense of the environment that they and everyone else must depend on for survival. For eons, the various species and habitats have maintained and balanced themselves, have survived major natural catastrophes, and managed to cooperate in such a way that h uman life could flourish...creating the framework for the evolution of the world's most notorious polluters. After nearly 200 years of unfortunate lifestyle choices, the Earth has given herself terminal Cancer! Our collective egos, shortsightedness, and se lf - absorption have made it possible for the polluters to tip the scales toward a massive and unprecedented global environmental crisis. Meanwhile, these polluters build up massive family fortunes that will be available to insulate their progeny from the fa llout as the world reconciles things on its own. And, unless my understanding of things is severely flawed, the EPA is not staffed by the profiteers of pollution...only influenced by them. If this is accurate, it means your children and grandchildren will be left with the bill and the burden of cleaning up after these deeply flawed decisions and will likely spend most of their lives merely surviving. Is this what you are promising your children now? Are their bedtime stories full of despair, misery and hope lessness to prepare them emotionally for the coming era? Or will they too be a generation of the myopic and distracted...careless of the coming storm and/or convinced thatEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 565 someone else will do something about it? You and I both know, there won't always be a someone else to come to the rescue. It's humbling to think that One 25,000,000th of life's time on Earth could have such a dramatic impact. This is obviously profoundly disturbing. However, one could also argue that if we are so capable of destroying our world in such a small amount of time, we ought to be at least partially capable of putting it back together...and quickly. I am optimistic that all hope is not yet lost. While the adversary is certainly formidable, I do believe in the power of democracy a nd the collective will of mankind to forge incredible change. Institutions like the EPA have a pivotal role - it can leverage the resources of the free world toward one direction or another. Which will you chose? Which direction can you proudly share with your grandchildren? Which direction allows them to have a chance at a bright future? Granted, the EPA can not solve all problems, but it can start small and build on marginal success inspiring other agencies and the international community to rally behind it. Imagine, not being the poster - child of the corporate marionette! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Wellman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4257 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Coal Industry long and its total lack of concern with environmental effects is a disgrace to our co untry! The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must overcome their political power, and require all waste water to use the best available technology to reduce or eliminate water pollution. The EPA now must sieze this opportunity to create new standards t hat will protect people and the environment from dangerous pollution. The EPA must mandate that power plants install zero liquid discharge technology, and convert to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wa stewaters entirely. The currently proposed regulation includes less stringent standards, which fall short of what the Clean Water Act requires and do not go far enough to clean up this toxic pollution. Only byEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 566 enacting the toughest standards proposed will EPA fulfill its duty to protect people and the environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Adam Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4 259 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Safe water is becoming one of the single most important resources on this planet. We in the United States must do our part to ensure that we are not the cause of over pollution not only for the global environment, but for our own citizens' safety and well being. Therefore, I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power p lant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Mullin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4260 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Externa l Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA must enact rules to protect our water from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Quist Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4262 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Ex cerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 567 The Clean Water Act has done decades of good work, removing pollution from our waterways to make them "drinkable, fishable, and swimable" once again. But power plants are exempt, and wish to remain so. It's time to end these exemptions. Comment Re sponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Crowe Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4263 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External R eview External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We expect the Federal government to protect our country in the sense of all the things we share as a country. Our land from war, our water from pollution, our air so we can breathe, ou r food so we can eat. These are not states rights or political stances. It IS the purpose of the Federal government. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See res ponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Matuco Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4264 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Water is becoming a precious commodity that many communities can't get in sufficient q uantities anymore. Aquifers are becoming depleted all over the U.S. It's time to treat water as the precious comity it is, and not as something that can be wasted and contaminated at will without further thought. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 568 Commenter Name: Deborah B. (surname not provided) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4265 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ex ternal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's time for the USA to get serious about the huge amounts of toxic minerals -- literally tons of tons every year -- that enter our environment from power plants. I urge EPA to finalize a str ong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Pohly Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Numb er: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4266 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I, AND MY FRIENDS AND FELLOW CITIZENS DESERVE THE RIGHT IN A LAND LIKE OURS TO BE POSITIV ELY SURE WE ARE DRINKING THE CLEANEST WATER POSSIBLE AND THAT THE STREAMS AND LAKES ARE THE VERY CLEANEST POSSIBLE. PLEASE DO THE RIGHT THING AND END POWER PLANT POLLUTION NOW!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. and B. Ostroth Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4268 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We would like to add our names to those urging the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We were surprised to learn has notEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 569 met, or come close to meeting, the clean wate r standards mandated by the 1972 Clean Water Act, which should have been met in 1985. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Milton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Nu mber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4269 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. We need to end this reckless practice to help Mother Nature take care of herself. We need to think of the future generations that will rely on clean water and not be so selfish. The states are not all doing enough by themselves. The federal government needs to step in. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Petting ill Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4271 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is irrational to cont inue to allow power plants to pollute water. As we continue to have more extreme weather events clean water becomes harder to obtain and more and more necessary. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Bernhard Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4272 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 570 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EP A to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. After all, this is why the EPA exists - to protect the American people from toxins, especially those that we can control and/or eliminate. Strong standa rds to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer and reducing illness and the costs associated with providing the needed medical care. It is not only your impera tive, it is your duty and it is economically positive. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Roberts Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 427 4 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: NOTHING is more important in this world than to protect our water supply. Strong rules to protect our rivers, lakes a nd streams from toxic power plant wastewater are critical to achieve this goal. It’s past time to hold these plants accountable. Implementation of the strongest standards to limit all power plant water pollution is the job of the EPA. Please DO YOUR JOB! C omment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Peck Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4275 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 571 The EPA must finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It’s time to end this reckless practice. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will save the environment from ongoing destruction. We have to provide for future generations! Comme nt Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Renton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4276 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Exte rnal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing as the grandmother of six young American citizens, concerned for their health and the health of our environment. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Kin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4 277 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am a full supporter of measures that protect our waters from power plants. I think our government should make thi s a high priority even if this costs us a lot of taxpayer money. I think it's important to think in the long - term and I, as a voter, fully back any measure that protects our waters. Please put in place strong protective regulations. Please, please, please! ! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 572 Commenter Name: S. Pietrowski Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4278 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Fl ag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The protection and stabilization of our environment is so much more important than any product to be manufactured, any profit to be made. Ensuring we have clean water is undoubtedly of the utmost importance; for drinking, but more largely for all aspects of life and the lives we share this planet with. Without water, real clean water in its pure, original state, we would not exist, and if we ruin that vital resource we will not be able to continue. This isn't just about the health of future generations; it's about right now, respecting our home, ourselves and each other. The time is now to change our destructive path, and it's really not an option. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Kade Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4279 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Externa l Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Stop ALL toxics entering our waters. Those from energy production sources should be no exception. Water is at least as precious as energy. Arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium are killers, no matter what the source. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Kramer Commenter Aff

iliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4280 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 573 Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We are approaching, if not already past the point of no return in taking our natural resources for granted. We must clean up our environment immediately and preserve healthy standards . This is every bit as much a job creator in the sense of that it creates a demand for new technologies and methods. Let's begin the clean up in earnest. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P . Madrigal Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4281 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Do we not want our children and grandchildren to live in a peaceful society? There will be no peace with poor health thanks to polluted waters! Have you seen a child with poor health? Not a pretty site! Especially when it is on your conscience because you did nothing to protect them. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I urge EPA to enforce the rules and regulations for all of us. The USA must lead by example. Comment Response: See response to D CN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. D. Beck Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4284 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review In corporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would appreciate anything the EPA would do to issue strong rules to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic pollution from coal fired power plants. I also support any optionEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 574 that would require Duke Energy and other utilities to stop storing coal ash and other wastes in leaky impoundments, to use the best biological and chemical treatments available on all of their wastewater, and to use evaporation treatment for sludge waste from air pollution scrub bers. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Brown Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4286 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Fl ag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water is essential to life and health. Already we are warned not to eat fish more than once a week because of the mercury buildup in their flesh, thus denying us a healthy protein alternative. It is essential that we stop polluting our food and water supplies with these toxic heavy metals. No entity should have the right do this kind of damage to the people of our nation. I can't dump my garbage on my neighbor's p roperty, so why should a large corporation be allowed to dump theirs on the rest of us? The same rules need to apply to all. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Rienstra Commenter Affiliat ion: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4287 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am a lifelong resident of Michigan and I am committed to the preservation of the Great Lakes and all Michigan's beautiful rivers and lakes. Therefore, I would like to express my support for strong EPA standards to prevent power plant pollution. Public sentiment about the environment has changed imme nsely since 1982. Please know you have my support for very strong laws against power plant pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 575 Commenter Name: L. Goodwin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Do cument Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4288 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It really is common sense - pollution in our water means pollution in our bodies - and sickening effects on other life forms and the planet. There is no excuse for not doing everything known to be effective to prevent toxic dumping in waterways. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams fr om toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Evans Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4289 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I have to clean up MY mes ses. Tell them they have to clean up THEIRS. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Goodwin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4291 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 576 My organization, Toxics Information Project (TIP) would like to be addedto the list of those calling for strict, serious s tandards to reduce power plant pollutants entering waterways. It is pure common sense that such toxins should not be allowed to wind up in our drinking water, food, and environment. The effects on our health and that of other living things are dreadful. We join Clean Water Action in urging EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Thomas Comm enter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4292 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am amazed that I even have to write this message emphasizing how important clean fresh water is to our own existence. I have seen firsthand how much the great lakes have receded in the past ten years and it seems that this will continue at an exponential rate if nothing is done. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Turner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citize n Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4293 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Considering how important water is to our life and the life of all creatures, we must be somewhat insane to allow toxic material to be put into our water. We did not always know the damage it could cause. Now we know. What is going to be done about it?Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 577 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exce rpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Doerksen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4294 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Com ment Excerpt: After all, our water, our environment as a whole can only take so much abuse before serious permanent damage is done, and much of our wildlife is left without the resources they need to survive. We as humans also rely on much of these natur al resources, so why are we abusing and taking advantage of it? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. McCarthy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4296 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The intent of the Clean Water Act is to restore the physical, biological, and chemical quality of U.S. waters. If the owners of power plants are polluting our water, they need to clean up their act. EPA should be fair to all of us and enforce the Clean Water Act for the benefit of all Americans, especially children and future generations. Comment R esponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Walthers Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4297 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Extern al Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 578 ONE OF OUR GREATEST GIFTS IS CLEAN WATER! I understand that Michell Obama is promoting water to drink. That's wonderful, but only if the water is clean. OBVIOUSLY, ALL LIFE DEPENDS ON CLEAN WATER: WHAT MORE IS THERE TO SAY? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Reid Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4299 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Some coal plants are already using this sensible, affordable approach. Limiting the amount of pollution in our water will save liv es, keep our children healthier, and make our water safer to drink, and make and our fish safer to eat. We will leave our children a better world if the EPA requires these actions. Please finalize this and do it immediately. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Huybensz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4300 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Rev iew Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I was working at a company that tested environmental samples for pollutants when President Reagan was in office. We had pile of contaminated samples [Dioxins & PCB oils] waiting for a secure landfill. B ut when Regan lifted the standards on waste that could be dumped legally, my boss told me to just toss them in the regular trash. I refused and left that job shortly thereafter. I can only imagine what a nightmare lifting those regulations have been on the environment. All of those toxins leeching into the environment must have had a devastating effect on flora and fauna, not to mention humans. Heavy metals are extremely toxic in that they accumulate through time in each animal until they reach a toxic leve l and when the animal is eaten by a predator, the predator takes on the toxin from the prey and passes it to its offspring. We have seen this happen in Raptors, with fish as the prey. That is why strengthing these regulations is so important. I wantEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 579 to liv e in a world with wild plants and animals in it. Don't you want that for yourself and your children? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Frazier Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Doc ument Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4306 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge the EPA to issue stonger standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Limiting all power plant water pollution will greatly improve the health of our waterways, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. As well as, w ater treatment facilities efficiency and overall effectiveness toward clean drinking water and the overall health of our communities and families by mitigating contaminants on site of the major contributors. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Joanne J. (surname not provided) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4307 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Here are the basics - we need clean water, air, and food in order to have a healthy population that will be a credit to the nation. We cannot be the 'leader of the free world' if our population is u ndermined by a toxic environment. We won't be able to lead anything if we don't have the basis for good health. Good God, why do we have to have this conversation AGAIN? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Co mmenter Name: K. Gaston Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4308Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 580 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: My nam e is Kim Gaston and I live next to the Duke Energy G.G. Allen plant. I’ve been in my home for 15 years and my mom, who lives in my neighborhood, has lived by the plant for 45 years. We’ve noticed problems with our well water and I want to make sure that Du ke is cleaning up its pollution from the plant. I ask that the EPA enforce the best water quality standards for power plants so that we can have clean drinking water in Belmont. We have black stains in our toilet and on our hoses. There’s also black stains on our carport and asphalt that weren’t there 4 years ago. I’ve seen ash fall from the sky and I know that the scrubbers are doing a better job at keeping our air cleaner. But, I don’t want all the metals and toxins from the scrubber waste to enter our gr oundwater. Please require the coal ash ponds to have liners and for the wastewater to be treated with the best available technology. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Comments about the CCR rule are outsi de the scope of this rulemaking. Commenter Name: B. and M. Wrenn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4316 Comment Excerpt Number: 3 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need to do all we can to protect our drinking water and lake water. Please implement strong safeguards that would require utilities like Duke Energy to stop storing this coal waste wet, and to treat their waste water so that its not causing harm to Bele ws Lake and our drinking water, now and into the future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Vilis Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 581 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 431 8 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have lived in the Charlotte area since 1964 and I’ve been in my current home in Belmont for 27 years. The Duke Energy Allen plant is located behind my house and I am very worried that the pollution from the plant could be affecting my well water and the air quality in our community. Before they installed the scrubbers, there was black dust all over our homes, cars, and ya rds. Now that ash is put into the ponds around the plant, there could be groundwater contamination and river pollution from the scrubber waste. Seems to me like the standards are extremely lax - the fact that Duke doesn’t have to check for arsenic in the w ater is ridiculous. The EPA needs to fix the lack of standards and I’d like to know that they are testing for arsenic and other carcinogens in the ponds and groundwater. Congress and the government are only concerned about special interests - it’s like the fox is guarding the henhouse. We need the protections promised by the EPA since our representatives and the power companies are not willing to clean up pollution issues. I haven’t eaten fish from the local streams or Catawba River in over 25 years. And, I won’t swim in any of the creeks, the river, or the lake by my house. It’s like we’re so scared to use the resource that’s so close to our homes it almost negates why we live here. The Catawba River is important enough to save and humans have destroyed eno ugh of the planet. That’s why I expect the EPA to start requiring better tests and pollution clean - up from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Hoffman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4319 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: My name is Don Hoffman and I’ve lived in Belmont, NC s ince January 1, 1940. I am writing in support of the EPA enacting the strongest effluent limitation guidelines possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 582 Commenter Name: J. Rhyne Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4320 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have lived near the Duke Energy G.G. Allen plant in B elmont, NC for 45 years. The plant was built before I’ve moved here and we haven’t had problems with our water or air until the last four to five years. The EPA needs to create better water pollution standards for coal plants like the Allen plant so that t he people living near them can have safe water to use. Duke Energy has been in our area for a long time and they provide good jobs. But I don’t want to have bad water or have my children and grandchildren get sick from their pollution. My daughter, son, an d his children all live near me and have experienced similar air and water pollution signs. Please update the effluent limitations guidelines to use the best available technology and require evaporation treatment for sludge impoundments. Comment Response: See the preamble to the final rule and the response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Witter Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4321 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I'm a resident of Ann Arbor in SE Michigan. I support the strongest option outlined in the EPA's proposed standards, which would eliminate almost all toxic waste dumped into rivers, streams, lakes. I support standards that increase available information on amount and types of toxic chemicals dumped into our fresh water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Sorensen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4322 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 583 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We have one planet to live on, and this is it. If we are to survive as aspecies, we need clean water to drink and to provide habitat for water dwelling creatures. It is up to you to set standards that will insure that we have it. Please do your job as well and fully as you can, which means you will protect our water, air and earth. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Anderson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4323 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Exter nal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA's purpose is to PROTECT OUR ENVIRONMENT. I STRNGLY ENCOURAGE YOU TO DO EXACTLY THAT! Stop allowing pollution that we could actually stop. Specifically, I implore the EPA t o ISSUE VERY STRONG STANDARDS to ACCOMPLISH DEEP REDUCTIONS IN TOXIC WATER COMING FROM POWER PLANTS. We need that in order to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from that pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerp t Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Stancek Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4324 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Commen t Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 584 I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I come from a family of fishermen and women, and stewardship of our waterways is deeply important to all of us. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Warrilow Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4326 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. This issue is critical and the needs to be addressed NOW. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Monfalcone Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4327 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am tired of worrying about which fish to eat because of possible pollutants they have ingested. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve t he health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. The food and water we ingest need to be held sacred, and the polluters need to held accountable for poisoning the environment in which we live. Comment Response: See res ponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 585 Commenter Name: B. Ouden Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4328 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External R eview Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: How can anyone not want to insure a supply of clean, pure, safe drinking water to all Americans? I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plan t wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Ianniello Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4329 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We have a finite amount of potable w ater, we can't afford to pollute this life giving resource. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Villalovoz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4331 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: PLEASE stop power plants from dumping toxic wastewater with billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into our water supply! It's really gross and eventually causes healthEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 586 problems that drive up the cost of healthcare. Do you really want to eat fish and vegetables exposed to this stuff? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2 265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Parkhurst Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4332 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respon se: No Comment Excerpt: I have multiple myeloma, a blood cancer that is possibly caused by environmental pollutants. Whether or not pollution is the cause, it makes no sense that anyone should be allowed to put toxic waste into the water supply. Clean wa ter is becoming scarce across the planet, and it's high time that everyone work to protect it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. A. Madsen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Documen t Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4333 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is past time for the EPA to finish what the Clean Water Act started more than 40 years ago. Please help clean up communities and natural areas across America by requiring power plants and other industries to apply the best available methods and technologies to the reduction and management of heavy metal laden waste. I am sick and tired of industry groups getting a free pass to pollute our water while claiming to produce cost effective power and products. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. D. Shumaker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4334 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 587 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to demand that the EPA i ssue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We cannot allow this travesty to continue; our precious environment, and our healthy future depend on what you do to pre vent this corporate madness. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Stahlke Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4335 - A1 Comment Excerpt Numbe r: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. The Environmental Protection A gency should be doing everything in its power to Protect the Environment. It is their mandate. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Jansen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4336 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I want the EPA to help my community of Asheville save the French Broad River from the ongoing pollution of Duke Energy's coal - fired plant whose coal ash ponds are leeching into the French Broad close by the plant.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 588 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Madison Comment er Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4338 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am troubled by the fact that over 80% of coal plants in the country currently are allowed to dump heavy metals into our waterways with no limits. I am in support of the Effluent Limitation Guidelines under the Clean Water Act Standards to be enacted. These guidelines could prevent up to 5 .3 billion pounds of toxic metals from ending up in our waterways. It is harmful to our environment and morally wrong to use our waterways as the industries dumping grounds. I support that the U.S. Environmental Protection agency finally working to update those standards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Zinni Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4341 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is a public and ecological resource, the most basic and necessary for healthy life, and it should be managed very strictly to ensure its cleanliness. There is no reason that we should not employ the best equipment available in power plants to keep water clean. The power industry like any other must be compelled not to violate the public interest. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 589 Commenter Name: S. D. Bennett Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4342 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Re sponse: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I grew up in Maryland in the 1960's and 70's and even as a kid was very aware of the issue of a polluted Chesapea ke Bay due to corporate pollution of the various sources in the watershed that fed it as well as pollution of it by companies who had plants on the shorelines. We can live without almost everything these corporations that are doing the polluting provide, w e, and all the other life on this planet, cannot survive without potable water. As certain areas of our country are losing their water sources to drought and other natural changes due to the global weather patterns changing, water is going to be the most p recious resource that we have, far outstripping our needs for power and products. Please think towards the future as well as our present needs and keep our sources to potable water untainted by corporate pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EP A - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Gilden Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4343 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpor ated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As an environmental health nurse, I see the effect of pollution on human health daily. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Asmus Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4345 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 590 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am taking the time to write you personally to urge the Environmental Protection Agency as forcefully as I can to act promptly and firmly to finalize zero - discharge water pollution standard s to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Allowing power plants to continue their current dangerous pollution of our water is not acceptable. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. and S. Fuqua Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4346 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We are on a private well. I’m concerned about the drinking water since our property butts up next to Duke Energy’s. I’m writing to urge EPA to issue a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic pollution from coa l - fired power plants. I support any option that will require Duke Energy and other utilities to stop storing coal ash and other wastes in leaky impoundments, to use the best biological and chemical treatments available on all of their wastewater. Comment R esponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Watkins Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4347 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External R eview External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 591 That is why I am writing - to urge EPA to issue a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from the pollution that comes from coal - fired power plants. Duke Energy should be required to use the best biological and chemical treatments available on all of their wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. J. Becker Commenter Affiliation: City Water, Light and Power (CWLP) Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4349 - A2 Comment Excerpt Number: 15 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In conclusion, CWLP strongly supports the goals o f the Clean Water Act and USEPA’s efforts to achieve cleaner water, including through this proposed new rule. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Dantes Commenter Affiliation: Private Cit izen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4350 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: My children deserve clean water!!! Isn't there enough disease i n this world? Protect are water and end power plant water pollution! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Sirch Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 4351 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 592 Comment Excerpt: I am very concerned about protecting America's rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewate r. The EPA should use its power to ensure clean water for all our citizens by requiring power plants to reduce the amount of pollution they can release into our waterways. We need strong standards to limit power plant water pollution and improve the health of our rivers and streams. Our health and that of our children depends on having such standards in place. I applaud the EPA's effort to require clean water standards for power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerp t Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Kates Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4352 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Toxins in our drinking water cause cancer in children and adults. If anyone in your family has had cancer, then you know the pain, s uffering, and loss that occurs. Let's rid our drinking water of carcinogenic and toxic chemicals so that we may grow old healthy. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Powers Commenter Affil iation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4353 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I kayak, stand up paddle and love our Potom ac River and USA waters. Please help the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. C'mon, we have too many mutants, diseased fish and other problems to now want to take action.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 593 Fracking is giv ing us abundant energy so let's use the low cost energy to clean up other areas like pollution discharge by power plants. Look at your kids or your nieces/nephews and tell them they don't deserve clean and safe public waterways. They do and thanks for taki ng the right steps. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Wargo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4354 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It is time to strengthen the standar ds to protect us now and in the future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Howland Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4355 - A1 Comment Ex cerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. CLEAN water is esse ntial to the health and well - being of all living things. I can't believe that the EPA would not put an end to the dumping of dangerous chemicals and other substances into our rivers, lakes and streams. This is long overdue, and I beg you to take the strong est possible action to improve and preserve the quality of our water resources. It's about our generation and the generations to come. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 594 Commenter Name: B. Benbrook Commente r Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4356 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge EPA to finalize a st rong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It is imperative that we have stronger standards to limit all power plant water pollution to improve the quality of our lakes and waterways, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. We need to put an end to this reckless practice for the safety and future of our children, our planet, and ourselves. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Renner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4357 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: They dump WHAT in our water? No, I don't want the toxic metals and other harmful chemicals dumped in my drinking/irrigating/fishing water by power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Hluhan Commenter Affiliat ion: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4358 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is necessary for our existence. It needs to be clean, free from industrial pollutants.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 595 I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Na me: C. Justice Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4359 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We have laws and rights to provide us with clean water free from poisons, but unless the agencies paid by our taxes to protect us do so, it does not happen. I want my grandchildren and their children to see better waters than I have in my lifetime. I was born in 1950 and things have improved a lot, but we have to fight to stand in place lately. Let's move o n! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Steinman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4360 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Fla g: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our water is perhaps our most precious resource. Its protection must be highly prioritized to ensure the health of the planet, ourselves, and generations to come. There is a constant threat to our water in the form of power plant pollution. This is not an abstraction; toxins are being dumped now, and this will continue without a strong stance on the part of the Environmental Protection Agency. We depend upon the EPA as a n authority in defense against these threats. I beseech all those involved to take the strongest possible action against the practice of toxic dumping.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 596 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: F. Trescott Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4361 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA needs to ta ke action NOW to finalize a strong rule to guard our waters against toxic waste dumped by the industrial water polluters! We need clean water four our children and grandchildren to drink! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exc erpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Ledlan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4362 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comm ent Excerpt: I strongly urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. The danger to the public health not immediate; but rather incidious, and individuals may be struck down with cancer in their thirties, forties or fifties, a tragic time to die from a preventable risk. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Kokkelenberg Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4363 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 597 I urge EPA to act in favor of stronger protection for US rivers, lakes and streams ag ainst toxic power plant wastewater. This affects the natural services rivers supply to Americans. This practice must stop. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Lambeth Commenter Affiliation : Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4364 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Coal power plants are tremendous polluters. Their effluent and byproducts contain large volumes of toxic heavy metals including arsenic selenium and chromium along with acids. These pollutants are dumped into our waters without mitigation. I urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Herrington Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4365 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am an avid fisherman and outdoorsman and have educated my children to respe ct our environment and I would truly hope you'll do the same. I have established a monofilament recycling bin at my local lake to make sure used fishing line is properly recycled and does not end up in our water. I also urge my children and friends to pick up any discarded debris, even if someone else left it there. When I fish in streams I have a MonoMaster attached to my vest so I can easily capture any loose small pieces of fishing line instead of dropping them in the water, which I can later recycle. Ev ery little bit counts when it comes to recycling and keeping our water clean and pure. I'm doing my part....please do yours!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 598 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Shopp Commenter Affiliation : Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4366 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect o ur rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. A very small percentage of the Earths water is drinkable, why make that percentage smaller when we have sprawling populations? We're effectively polluting ourselves and moving backwards to a " third world country" setting. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Byington Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4367 - A1 Comment Excerpt Num ber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Industry cares for stockholder’s interests. Government should care for the taxpayer’s interest. Demanding responsibility for the coal industr y or any other industry to maintain rigorous standards in protecting water, the taxpayer’s most valuable natural resource, is why federal oversight was established over 40 years ago. Yet here we are over 40 years later watching the Clean Water Act get igno red and threatened in the name of industry profits. Except this time it is not the burning Cuyahoga, but the besieged mountain coves of Appalachia causing America to demand action. Clean water should be our number one priority, and never be allowed to be p ut on the negotiating table by lobbyists. While clean water is more valuable to the human race than any other commodity, I have an ethical responsibility also to the stewardship of the last remnants of this planet’s natural ecosystems. These ecosystems, an d in particular those of the Southern Appalachians, are much too important to the economies of the states and communities of the region now and in the future, to be destroyed by short term corporate greed. Destruction of the nature of mountaintop removal, is irreversible when considering the loss of ecosystems and theEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 599 many species endemic to them. In addition, when the coal is burned, power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, the se plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. Existing technology can easily solve this problem and should be employed. If it is not the responsibility of the Environmental Protection Agency to protect this e nvironment, then whose is it? Please strengthen the clean water protection standards for all industries. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Galligan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4368 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Water is our most precious resource. How will we live without clean water. Please, take this very seriously. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: F. Shamlian Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4369 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: What is m ore vitally important to the health of our nation than clean water and air? I urge EPA to approve a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic wastewater from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 226 5, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 600 Commenter Name: M. Bugamelli Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4370 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. As a lifelong Michigan resident I have sadly seen our beloved lakes and rivers succumb to the onslaught of chem icals which pollute our waters. These waterways lose their potential to be beneficial to our tourism industry. We lose vital resources as well as the ability to enjoy that which humankind has long taken for granted. With beaches, lakes and streams no longe r clean and safe for swimming and drinking, and fish no longer safe for consumption, what does our future hold? How can we possibly bring it all back, once it has been lost? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Kocher Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4371 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please enact laws and policies that protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Fresh water is the most precious resource on Earth. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Weid Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4372 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 601 I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Please put our children and our country's health and wellness at the forefront and stop the senseless dumping of these toxic chemicals in to our precious wa ter. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Elliot Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4373 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Fla g: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The time is long overdue. I live in a state that has one of the highest incidents of cancer. I also live in a state that has the highest rate of premature deaths from air pollutants. My State is largely a watershed for the Chesapeake Bay and I don't like the fact that we are the filter for so many of the power plants that are not only in Maryland but Virginia, West Virginia, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and New Yo rk. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Strong standards to limit power plant water pollution will improve the health of my family and friends here in Maryland. Please act today to save our future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Streeter Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 4374 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With the large increase in cancer rates in the US, I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rive rs, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Out water is our most precious resource and allowing power plants to pollute it is a travesty of the largest magnitude!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 602 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Watts Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4375 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is very expensive when it takes health. I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Ryan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4376 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporate d into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Please act now to save our drinking water before it's too late. Comment Response: See response to DCN E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: V. Henry Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4377 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpor ated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 603 I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. There is nothing more precious than our water -- our health, our children's health and the health of ou r planet depends upon it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. LeBon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4378 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I encourage the EPA to set up strong standards limiting all power plant water pollution to improve the health of rivers and streams, making the wate r we drink and the fish we eat safer, as well as making humans safer. Set up these standards today to give us a cleaner tomorrow. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Paul Nazaryk Commenter Affiliation: BHP Navajo Coal Company (BNCC) and San Juan Coal Company (SJCC) Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4380 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment E xcerpt: BNCC and SJCC are generally supportive of EPA's efforts to update and revise the existing ELGs and standards for electric power generating stations. In many ways, the existing ELGs do not reflect improvements in pollution control technology and p ractices that have occurred over the last thirty years. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 604 Commenter Name: J. Madras Commenter Affiliation: Missouri Department of Natural Resources Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4383 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Missouri Department of Natural Resources appreciates the work Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) performed in developing revisions to the Steam Electric Effluent Limit Guidelines (ELG) to reflect the changes in science and operations at steam electr ic generating plants over the previous thirty years. The Department supports EPA's rulemaking and is providing these comments to assist EPA in the adoption of the new ELG. The Department reviewed the Proposed Ejjluent Limitations Guidelines and Standard s for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category and provides the following comments. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Leslie Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Doc ument Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4387 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and s treams from toxic power plant wastewater. The pollution that continues in our waters is unacceptable. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Greene Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Doc ument Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4388 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I writing this letter of urgency asking for the EPA to finalize a stron g rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 605 Please help! Would you want it to be your family member that dies a preventable death? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Co mmenter Name: M. McEnearney Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4390 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Get these standards done so we can start forcing power plants to stop polluting our waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Rapp Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Co ntrol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4391 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We urgently need changes to laws about what power plants can dump into our stre ams and rivers, in the effluent from their power plants!!!!! I want the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize ZERO DISCHARGE water pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. No more mercury, arsenic and other poisons in our drinking water and streams/rivers;!!!!!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Warber Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Numb er: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4392 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 606 It has recently come to my attention that numerous coal - fired power plants are needlessly polluting the freshwater bodies of the Great Lakes Region. As an employee at a water filtration plant in Michigan and having studied the effects of pollutants from coal - fired power plants throughout my studies towards a bachelors of science, this troubles me. As a concerned citizen, I strongly urge that an increased measure to control the dumping from coal - fired power be taken. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Engelhardt Commenter Affil iation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4393 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a U.S. citizen and New Mexico voter livi ng in Germany, I am very concerned about the impact of lax environmental laws on the North American environment, and on planetary climate change. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Willia ms Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4394 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We are all becoming increasingly alarmed about environmental degradation as its effects become ever more apparent. PLEASE USE YOUR POWER to protect our water and all ci tizens along with it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 607 Commenter Name: K. Sherman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4395 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 E xternal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: If we know we need power, we cannot with any sensibility allow that need for power to pollute our waters and disease our peoples. It only makes sense to rely upon power if it is serving us, not harming us. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Com menter Name: S. Gottesman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4396 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: W e have too much scientific and anecdotal information to tell us that we are poisoning people, plants and animals. It HAS TO STOP!!! WE can't leave our children without clean water. WE have already caused too much pollution, mutation and destruction. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. McCaully Commenter Affiliation: Private Citi zen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4399 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 608 I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will hav e the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. While we all need reliable access to electricity, it's our responsibility to require all utility companies and other power generators to ensure their power plants use the best available technology to reduce the greatest amount of pollution possible. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. Existing technology can easily solve this problem and should be employed. Limiting all power plant water pollution will grea tly improve the health of our waterways, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Henry Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4400 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Electric utilities exercise so much political sway over state legislatures, p oliticians, and bureaucrats that state regulation just cannot protect the people. Please issue strong standards that will truly protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Hiestand Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4401 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Re sponse: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 609 I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Do what's the right thing and that's what you were set up to do, save our planet!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Franklin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4402 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is your job to make sure that the waters in the USA are clean and proteted from gross poluters and abuses. Please act to insure that america's wa ter reasources are kept drinkable, clean and safe for this and futrue generations. I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Janzen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4404 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Externa l Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We are killing ourselves with all our pollutants and chemicals. The EPA is SUPPOSED to be on our side, but anymore, they're on the polluters' side. Time and time again, the EPA look s the other way as our air and water is made toxic. We're killing the animals and slowly killing ourselves. Coal plants are among the dirtiest polluters there are as they dump heavy metals into our waterways with no limits or regulations. How much longer d o you think this can go on??? Enough already. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 610 Commenter Name: C. Jurczewski Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4405 - A1 C omment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and s treams from toxic power plant wastewater. HOW CAN THE EPA BE CALLED NA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WHEN IT'S ALLOWING POWER PLANTS TO PROFUSELY POLLUTE THE WATERWAYS??!!!PLEASE,DO YOUR JOB AND KEEP OUR DRINKING WATER CLEAN AND CLEAN FOR THE MARINE LIFE ! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Blain Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4406 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Public health must come first. We have been paying for the health costs created by power companies who are getting away with making people sick, a situation that must sto p. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Davie Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4407 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater, including the Chesapeake Bay watershed.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 611 It’s time to end t his reckless practice, by ending exemptions for economic reasons. We can afford to to reduce power plant pollution of our environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Bradford Commente r Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4409 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We should place as high a value on t aking care of our environment and common resources that we all need to live like water, as we do on taking care of our individual health! We should be proud of how we take care of our resources. It is a mark of civil society. Let's be good stewards of the earth God gave us and say no to pollution! I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. DeLusant Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4410 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to f

inalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Lets not wait until its too late. It might just be your children and grandchildren that suffer the consequences of your inaction. Comment Response: See respo nse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Dauerty Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4411 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 612 External Review Flag: No External Review External R eview Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must finalize the strongest of the proposed standards for power plant water pollution in order to protect our waterways and ensure human safety. The Clean Wat er Act mandates that EPA require dischargers to use the best available technology to reduce or eliminalucrativeir water pollution. For decades, the coal industry has been allowed water mp millions of pounds of toxic waste into our rivers and streams withou t limit, and EPA now has the opportunity to create new standards that will protect people and the environment from this dangerous pollution. The proposed regulation includes less stringent standards that would fall short of what the Clean Water Act require s and would not go far enough to clean up this toxic pollution. Only by enacting the toughest standards proposed will EPA fulfill its duty to protect people and the environment. Unless the EPA wants water to be tbe next gold, with clean water out of reach of all but the wealthiest world denizens, it.will adopt, and put teeth into, future pollution limits from coal producers. Incentivizing transition of fossil fuels to clean energy production would help take pressure off this lucrative, but filthy business, and boost the economy, while promoting clean water amd air. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Glasoe Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4412 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a fine art photographer who specializes in photos of Lake Michigan, I find this issue particularly important, and I urge you to give it your full attention and support. We cannot continue to abuse the Great Lakes with pollution and indifference and expect them to rebound. They are past their ability to handle what we do to them. They need our help. Now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Benson Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 613 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4414 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Externa l Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Why is there a mining - polllution problem? For decades, the coal industry has been allowed to dump millions of pounds of toxic waste into our rivers and streams without limit. That's why! EPA now has the opportunity to create new standards that will protect people and the environment from this dangerous pollution. Only by enacting the toughest standards proposed will EPA fulfill its duty to protect people and the environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Rowe Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4415 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. I want my son to live in a healthy world, demolishing it..is not going to help. We need to find ways to clean up the world. I want the waters to be clean to swim in, drink from and all other else. I want to be able to see crystal blue waters, not scum and waste. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265 , Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Mehrotra Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4416 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 614 Power plants should be required to reduce pollution. Every year, these plants drop billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. Existing technology can easily solve this problem and should be employed therein. Limiting all power plant water pollution will greatly improve the health of waterways, and thus of people dependent on water. Accordingly I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for F.G.D. scrubber sludge waste. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Marine Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4417 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Having so many power plants in New Jersey it is important that we take precautions with our wat er supply, as a resident I am concerned for my health and the health and well being of our state. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Roy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document C ontrol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4418 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. This is about our children's health! lets take care of this. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 615 Commenter Name: C. Moyer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4419 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We cannot expect to have a healthy, giving population if we are poisoned and sickened by poison if we dare to drink water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commen ter Name: E. Crump Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4420 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am dis appointed at the levels of toxic chemicals we allow to be dumped into the waterways. Growing up on the eastern shore of MD, I have seen first hand how the health of the Bay has deteriorated. We must stop allowing businesses, from chemical companies to powe r plants to chicken farms, to poison our waters. We swim, fish and enjoy the rivers. Please help keep them safe. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Butler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4421 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Polluting our drinking water is crazy!!!!!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 616 Please enact stro ng rules to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Lynn C. (no surname provided) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4422 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The job of the EPA is to make sure the public is protected not the r ights of corporations when their best interests are in opposition to the public's best interest! Please in doing your job, keep the health and safety of the public foremost in your mind. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Setlow Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4423 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I live in Connecticut where there are still coal - fired power plants. These plants are the biggest industrial water polluters with the weakest water pollution standards. Everything dumped into our freshwater eventually ends up in Long Island Sound which is already heavily polluted. As I said above, please finalize strong standards for power plants and see that they are upheld. Commen t Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Kolodner Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 617 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4425 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please require power plants to use the best available technology to reduce pollution from arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Simmer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4426 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporat ed into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Some say our water is the next petroleum. I definitely do not want to drink oil, tho or anything else that is not healthy. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. McGillivray Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4428 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number : 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. Every year, these plants d ump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. This results in health related problems and puts children at great risk inEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 618 particular. We all need water to drink and to bathe and it is crucial to our survival and health t o have our water protected. Please do the right thing and protect the citizens of this country. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: F. Kelly Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document C ontrol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4429 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Let's restore Virginia's beautiful lakes and rivers to their original pristine condition, while there is still time. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Jennison Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4431 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to final ize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. This should not be decided by politics or financial lobbying. It is of the highest importance to the survival of the planet's inhabitants. Strong and enforceable rules need to be implemented...EPA, PLEASE DO YOUR JOB!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 619 Commenter Name: W. York Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4432 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. The strongest rule possible. Solutions will be found based on "necessity is the mother of invention." Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Usechak Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docume nt Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4434 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and stre ams from toxic power plant wastewater excessively warming nearby waterbodies and sucking up fish eggs and other sea life and destroying it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Thorne Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4435 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This issue is not hard to su pport. You are either intelligent and want to protect a natural resource or you are uninformed regarding the danger. No one wants to tell their children they failed to protect their future. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 620 No one gains from the alternative except big business and special interest groups. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Hornberger Commenter A ffiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4436 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power pla nt water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Furthermore, it will reduce the probability of people developing serious illnesses from water - borne chemicals, some of which we know to b e cancer - causing. Water is our most precious natural resource. Please do all you can to keep it as clean as possible for the health of all living creatures on this planet. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Hyma Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4437 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I u rge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Water is our most precious commodity. Make it safe! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Tate Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4438 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 621 Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. The most vital component (drinking water) of our most precious resource, Water, is under greater threat today than ever before. It is not only shrinking in volume but is also deteriorating in quality. If we could freeze the situation where it is today, we would still be in trouble tomorrow. We must take every action possible today to protect this vital resource. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - O W - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Goodman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4439 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Nobody should be exempt from the clean water act, period! I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Bradley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4440 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated i nto Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stand up for North Carolina's families and communities by implementing the strongest safeguards possible. We only have one earth, and one NC. I see too many negative changes in our envvironment, and I am concerned that our elected officials are thinking of today and the next election, not about our future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 622 Commenter Name: M. Franceschi Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docume nt Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4441 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and stre ams from toxic power plant wastewater. THese companies will not STOP doing this unless laws are enacted as all they care about is the cost to them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Uhe n Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4442 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I believe power plants sho uld stop polluting our water immediately, like yesterday? Curbing pollution is an open - ended remedy that gives industry power to decide how much is curbing. Give the only choice. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numb er 1. Commenter Name: A. Palladino Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4443 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Ex cerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Put the health of our people before the profits of big business!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 623 Comment Response: See r esponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Doss Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4444 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our state has been fighting for decades to reduce the damage caused to our rivers and water systems due to industrial expansion. Some of our rivers are still polluted to the point where fish are no l onger edible, and some have just gotten beyond that. This measure will define what the next 10, 20, and 50 years look like for our children and the natural resources that they have available to them in this great state. Comment Response: See response to D CN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. DiMuzio Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4445 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review In corporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. This issue is particularly important to me as a father, since not only does water pollution aff ect favorite pastimes with my children such as swimming and fishing, but the availability of safe water to drink is vital to all life, and must be preserved for future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Nu mber 1. Commenter Name: Lynn Thorp Commenter Affiliation: Clean Water Action (CWA) Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4451 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 624 C omment Excerpt: Steam Electric Power Plants are responsible for more than half of the toxic pollutants discharged directly into waters of the United States, more than the other nine top polluting industries combined . 2 Despite the scope of this pollution problem, existing standards have not been updated since 1982 and fail to set discharge limits on dangerous pollutants. According to EPA’s Proposed Rule, this failure is a factor in more than 160 water bodies not meeting state water quality standards, 185 w aters with fish consumption advisories and the degradation of 399 water bodies across the country that serve as drinking water supplies. 3 The Clean Water Act requires states to set strong discharge standards for polluters in the absence of federal standard s. 4 Unfortunately, most state permitting agencies have failed to set discharge permit limits for individual plants to require the best available treatment technology and protect water quality. Affordable technology exists to eliminate the toxic discharges from the seven waste streams addressed by the Proposed Rule, and many coal plants are using these technologies. 5 EPA has an obligation under the Clean Water Act to address this pollution. A strong final rule will reduce public health risk from drinking wat er and save Public Water Systems and their consumers money.

2 EPA, Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category 3 - 14 (April 2013) 3 http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/steam - electric/proposed.cfm 4 33 U.S.C. § 1314 (b); 40 C.F.R. § 122.44(a)(1), 123.25, 125.3 5 Environmental Integrity Project, Sierra Club, Clean Water Action, Earthjustice and Waterkeeper Alliance, Closing the Floodgates: How the Coal Industry is Poisoning Our Water and How We Can Stop It (2013), available at http://cleanwater.org/files/ publications/closing floodgates.pdf Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Lynn Thorp Commenter Affiliation: Clean Water Action (CWA) Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4451 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 5 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Ex cerpt: The strongest possible final Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category is justified and will reduce drinking water public health risks from, prevent drinking water challenges and save communiti es, Public Water Systems and their consumers money.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 625 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Chad Miller Commenter Affiliation: Montana - Dakota Utilities Co. Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 4457 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Montana - Dakota appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule and strongly encourages the EP A to reconsider parts of the proposed regulation. Montana - Dakota has several concerns with the proposed regulations, yet agrees with some of the provisions. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name : Lisa Carty Commenter Affiliation: Xcel Energy Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4458 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It has been over t hirty years since EPA last revised the ELGs. Since that time, wastewater treatment technology has changed as has analytical methods and the science regarding the waste streams generated by the steam electric industry. A review of the guidelines is appropri ate. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Basil G. Constantelos Commenter Affiliation: Midwest Generation, LLC. Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4464 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Midwest Gen supports the overall goal of the ELGs, which is to reduce the amount of metals and other pollutants discharged into surface waters. Mi dwest Gen strives to take a practical andEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 626 constructive approach to environmental rulemakings, supporting flexible regulations that achieve sound environmental objectives. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Fischer Commenter Affiliation: Appalachian Voices Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4479 Comment Excerpt Number: 4 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need federal oversight because North Carolina is taking huge steps backwards in terms of protecting our water resources. Our governor is an ex - Duke Energy employee and is weakening state rules that will make it easier to for them to continue to pollute . Duke Energy has no vested interest in the people of our state; only in themselves and the profits they can make. I hope EPA has our best interest at heart and issues strong standards that protect human health and our environment. Comment Response: See r esponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Nadia L. Luhr Commenter Affiliation: North Carolina Conservation Network (NCCN) Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4480 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review F lag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Despite significant changes in the steam electric power industry and the development of new technologies, the ELGs for this sector have not been revised since 1982. A s a result, according to the EPA, the current regulations “do not adequately address the toxic pollutants discharged from the electric power industry, nor have they kept pace with process changes that have occurred over the last three decades.” 2 According to data that the EPA has collected, steam electric power plants account for more than half of all toxic pollutants discharged to water bodies by all industrial categories currently regulated under the Clean Water Act. 3 These toxic discharges include danger ous pollutants such as lead, mercury, arsenic and selenium, among many others. Furthermore, “each year, the pollutant discharges from this industry are increasing in volume and total mass.” 4 This trendEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 627 threatens public health and natural resources, and it is vital that the EPA promulgate revised ELGs that are reflective of industry advancements and available technologies.

2 Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category, Proposed Rule; 78 Fed. Reg. 34,432 at 34,435 (June 7, 2013). 3 Id. 4 Id. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Garcia Commenter Affiliation: Appalachian Voices Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4481 C omment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to ask the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to update the standards on wastewater treatment at coal - fired power plants. I live in Arden, NC, where Duke/Progress Energy's Asheville Steam Station is located. I think there should be strict limits on the types and amounts of chemicals the plant should be able to put into the French Broad River, if there is to be a ny pollution that goes into the river. I recently went kayaking on the French Broad River for the first time recently and I thought the water seemed polluted. Even though lots of people enjoy fishing there, I hoped people were not consuming fish from this river. I was concerned to see some people on flotation devices playing in the water. Please do all you can to make sure that the best technology is used to keep dangerous chemicals and heavy metals from entering the French Broad River. Comment Response: S ee response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Smith Commenter Affiliation: Appalachian Voices Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4482 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 628 External Review Flag: No External Review Exte rnal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Ever since Duke Energy’s Belews Creek Steam Station began operation, I am so torn about living here; I hate to give it up. But I am concerned about my family’s health living here. Before the pla nt was built, I enjoyed living here but that is no longer the case. The air changed when the plant started up. Ash was a huge problem in the air; it would get on our cars. While things have gotten somewhat better since they put the scrubber on the smokesta ck, I still see fine particulate matter on my home. And now to think that the pollution that was going into the air could one day pollute my water is very big concern for me. My son lives next door to me and we share a well. I want to make sure he has clea n water for the future. I would not recommend that anyone build a house here. If arsenic should find its way into their water, their property will not be worth anything. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency needs to make sure that they put strong stand ards into place that protect our well water and Belews Lake from coal ash contaminants by requiring Duke Energy to treat their wastewater with the best technology available. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Dean Ellis Commenter Affiliation: Dynegy Inc. Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4491 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: For the reasons discussed below, Dynegy supports adoption of final revised ELG limits that are based on surface impoundments for bottom ash transport water, fly ash transport water and FGMC wastewater, and best professional judgment (BPJ) for FGD wastewate r for facilities with total wet scrubbed capacity of less than 2,000 MW. Furthermore, Dynegy agrees with EPA’s proposal to continue to regulate nonchemical metal cleaning wastewaters as they are now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 08 19 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 629 Commenter Name: B. and J. Bailey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4492 Comment Excerpt Number: 4 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into R esponse: No Comment Excerpt: It is clear that Duke Power will not voluntarily clean up the wastewater discharge and storage of coal ash waste so we urge the EPA to enact new updated guidelines that Duke Power will be required to meet in the Belews Creek plant. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Hart Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4496 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This is why I am writing to urge the EPA to stand up and issue a very strong rule to protect our lakes, streams and rivers from toxic pollution from coal fired plants. Co mment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Lish Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4498 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No Ext ernal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Limiting all power plant water pollution will greatly improve the health of our rivers, streams, and other waterways, which will in turn ensure our water is safe to drink and ou r fish safe to eat, and will ultimately save lives reduce the risk of children getting sick from these sources. The Environmental Protection Agency's strongest proposed approach is sensible, affordable, and already being used by some coal plants. It should be finalized and put into force as soon as possible.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 630 “Every man who appreciates the majesty and beauty of the wilderness and of wild life, should strike hands with the farsighted men who wish to preserve our material resources, in the effort to keep our f

orests and our game beasts, game - birds, and game - fish

— indeed, all the living creatures of prairie and woodland and seashore

— from wanton destruction. Above all, we should realize that the effort toward this end is essentially a democratic movement.”

-- The odore Roosevelt Again, I strongly urge the EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exce rpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Beth L. McGee Commenter Affiliation: Chesapeake Bay Foundation Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4513 - A2 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Resp onse: No Comment Excerpt: We strongly support the EPA’s regulatory proposal to update the ELGs and standards that apply to the steam electric power generating point source category. By its own admission, the current regulations, which were last updated i n 1982, do not adequately address the toxic pollutants discharged from the electric power industry, nor have they kept pace with process changes that have occurred over the last three decades. The development of new technologies for generating electric pow er (e.g., coal gasification) and the widespread implementation of air pollution controls (e.g., flue gas desulfurization (FGD), selective catalytic reduction (SCR), and flue gas mercury controls (FGMC)) have altered existing wastestreams or created new wa stewater streams at many power plants. This is especially true in Maryland which requires very stringent controls on the air emissions of NOx, SOx, and mercury. It is important that while we control pollution from one media (e.g., air), we are not simply t ransferring it to another (e.g., water or land). The proposal sets best available technology limits for several metals (As, Hg and Se, Cu, Fe), total dissolved solids and nitrogen, depending on the waste stream. These waste streams include: FGD wastewater, fly ash transport water, bottom ash transport water, combustion residual leachate from landfills and surface impoundments, nonchemical metal cleaning wastes, and wastewater from FGMC systems. Some of these waste streams are relevant to the Chesapeake regi on and some are not (e.g., many plants already have dry handling of fly ash). That said, CBF supports a national rule that would not only benefit the Chesapeake region, but the entire country.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 631 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265 , Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Hanson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4522 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. Why should be allo wed to do this? It’s time to end this reckless practice. Such irresponsible and willfully harmful actions should not be tolerated by any institution or any individual. It's just our lives that are being negatively impacted. It will also help support the fr agile ecosystems that we depend on but at the same time often shamefully neglect. It is imperative that we correct that dire reality and make corrective actions to be better citizens of the world - that is, after all, what the EPA is about in the first pla ce. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Bolek Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4523 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Its quite ridiculous that in the year 2013 we still have to worry about heavy metals and toxic chemicals lurking in our precious water sources! No one wants to drink poll uted water of course, but we also don't want to play in polluted water or eat fish from polluted water! Please send a strong message and stand up for what is right - protecting our bodies and our environment - by putting an end to water pollution by power plants. We are counting on you! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 632 Commenter Name: S. Hemmerle Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4524 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I understand that the power demands for this country are important, but nothing is more vital then the wellbeing and safety of the people who live in this country. Even the thought of toxic substances, no matter the quantity, being ingested through food and/or water is UNACCEPTABLE. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Neuman n Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4527 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a s trong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Consumers are taking a personal stance on conserving and protecting water, our most precious resource. Corporations should be held to an even higher standard. Comment Re sponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Cone Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4530 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Re view External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 633 Most of the creatures and plants on earth need clean water to survive. Every day United States water sources are being polluted a variety of ways. One way that can be easily stopped is pollution from power plants. STRONG ENFORCED EPA STANDARDS ARE NEEDED to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Driscoll Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4531 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporat ed into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am familiar with one of the Filthy Five, the power plant in southeastern MA that is polluting Narragansett Bay with overheated water and causing large fish kills. This bay is the source of livelihood for many fisherman in a very poor depressed area of the state. Many of the rivers and lakes in the Northeast are off limits to fishermen due to Mercury and other pollutants dumped by our power plants. They are sickening us. Comment Response: See response to DCN EP A - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. H. Fisher Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4532 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incor porated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: HOW COME GERMANY IS DOING SO MUCH MORE THAT US? I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 634 Commenter Name: Shellie Chard - McClary Commenter Affiliation: Association of Clean Water Administrators (ACWA) Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4535 - A2 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Exte rnal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Technology - based controls represent a fundamental and core aspect of the CWA, which have led to many of the water quality successes we see today. Much of the CWA’s National Pollu tion Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program’s success for both direct and indirect discharges has been supported by ELGs. As noted in the proposed rule, discharges of toxic pollutants from Steam Electric Power Generating facilities contribute to the total toxic discharges to surface waters in the United States. Id. at 34,432. It has been over 30 years since the last ELG was e stablished for this category of point sources. It is appropriate for EPA to update this rule. ACWA supports EPA’s rulemaking and is providing the following comments to assist EPA in the adoption of revised rules to address this industrial sector Comment Re sponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Unknown Mass Email Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4537 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must finalize the strongest of the proposed standards for power plant water pollution in order to protect our waterways and ensure h uman safety. The Clean Water Act mandates that EPA require dischargers to use the best available technology to reduce or eliminate their water pollution. For decades, the coal industry has been allowed to dump millions of pounds of toxic waste into our riv ers and streams without limit, and EPA now has the opportunity to create new standards that will protect people and the environment from this dangerous pollution. The best option proposed by EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technolo gy and convert to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. The proposed regulation includes less stringent standards that would fall short of what the Clean Water Act requires and would n ot go far enough to clean upEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 635 this toxic pollution. Only by enacting the toughest standards proposed will EPA fulfill its duty to protect people and the environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Comment er Name: A. Bagnasco Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4538 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The st ate need strong rules from the national level in order to make sure that plants are responsible about their effluent. It is absolutely unacceptable that our guidelines for coal plant effluent are as loose as they are and that many plants in Texas are opera ting with expired permits. I understand this issue to be a human right. I am from Waco Texas where coal plants surround the city. They are often put in poorer towns where the fight against them is in vain. It is also no surprise that cities like Austin and San Antonio place their plants downstream of the city. We don't want to drink that pollution. But, someone is drinking that water and eating that fish. Please make the right choice for the public good. Protect our children. Stand on the side of safe ty for communities. The cost to coal plants will be miniscule compared to the health costs associated with incation. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Deckler Commenter Affiliation: Pr ivate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4539 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I pleed with EPA to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. For our future. Lets end the reckless practice of allowing Power Plants to dump toxic chemicals into your waterways. The water we all consume at one point or another.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 636 We need standards in place to protect our most valuable resource! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Euston Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4540 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Exte rnal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: My home is a mile due east of the Arden power plant, up slope. I am retired as US HUD's director of its Environmental Planning Division (1970 - 1999) and r eviewed such matters as this. Duke Energy has demonstrated unwillingness since my move here in 2000 it's intent to ignore the issue of coal ash disposal. My news clippings since arrival here document this posture. EPA will be wise to doubt any claims to th e contrary. This is just as with TVA and most other power industry players in the Southeast. Furthermore, we live less than a mile south of the CTS plant site. My witness to that tragic poisoning of neighbors' wells gives me equal concern that this area sh all not be well served by either this State's environmental agency or this region's EPA office, sadly to say. No question, the coal ash accumulation pits a mile from us are hazards that are being ignored up to now and might come to grief any time, pollutin g the Tennessee and the Gulf. Down river from this neighborhood, lots of water supplies, fish and swimming spots are at grave risk. Millions may be required to pay for the damages, well above what remediation will require. Comment Response: See response t o DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Fellows Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4541 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The waters of the mid - Atlantic region of the United States will not be cleaned up until there is strong regulation to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from the toxic waste water from the region's powe r plants.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 637 Finalize strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of America's rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Kellogg Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4543 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. In spite of the recent floods in my area, Boulder, CO lies in an increasingly dry area. We can't afford wasting clean water. Pow er plants and the oil fracking industry should be required to use recycled, gray water for their work. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. MacLean Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen D ocument Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4544 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. My family lives to property adjoining the Duke Power plant in Belews Creek, NC. We frequently visit Belew's Lake to enjoy the water and the scenery. We also enj oy riding our horses to the lake. We are very concerned about the pollutants being dispelled into Belews Lake and were astonished to read about how lax the standards are for coal burning plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 22 65, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 638 Commenter Name: B. Fine Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4545 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is difficult for me to believe that in the year 2013, I should be writing to an agency called the Environmental Protection Agency to ask them to protect the environment. Isn't that what you are supposed to do? Doesn't Power Plant Wat er Pollution sound like a problem that demands your attention? I mean hasn't this pollution been going on long enough for you folks to pull yourselves together and make a strong attempt to cope with it? Good Lord!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Parent Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4546 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Attn: to the people who have the power to do the right thing and protect our water. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment R esponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Staab Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4547 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 639 Safe, clean water should be our top priority -- we can't let the pollu ters set the policies and continue to pollute our precious resources! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. B. Reynolds Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4551 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. Future generations depend on what we do now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Emmons Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4553 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewat er. KEEP IT OUT OF THE ENVIRONMENT! MAKE THEM STOP then MAKE THEM CLEAN UP YEARS OF DAMAGE. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. McFall Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Cont rol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4554 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 640 Comment Excerpt: This is IMPORTANT! This is the future of our planet. Our worldwide population is due to increase by huge numbers in the next 30 years, which means our current need for power will increase immensely, and the pollutants right along with it. We need to put a stake in the ground right now and demand power plants and other manufacturing fac ilities focus on cleaning up their own pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Purdue Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4555 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. The g overnment should speak for the people, not for big business! Please speak for the little guy, thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Swartz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4556 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes an d streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Water is a basic need - no person or animal can survive drinking polluted water. Profit should not override safety. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 641 Commenter N ame: Cecile M. Conroy Commenter Affiliation: International Brotherhood of Boilermakers (IBB) Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4557 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respo nse: No Comment Excerpt: IBB supports EPA's proposal to establish new or revised ELGs for affected steam electric generating facilities. EPA has not updated the ELGs for this source category since 1982. The rule will therefore achieve considerable envi ronmental benefits specifically reducing additional amounts of toxic metals and other toxic and conventional pollutants from affected generating facilities by strengthening existing technology - based standards applicable to these facilities. In addition , the EPA proposal will further assure adequate environmental protections by greatly expanding the scope of the 1982 ELG regulations . EPA has proposed to expand to scope of the ELG regulations primarily to address additional pollutants generated by the i ncreased use of FGD systems and other air pollution control technologies that generate new wastestreams, particularly at coal - fueled power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Cecile M. Conroy Commenter Affiliation: International Brotherhood of Boilermakers (IBB) Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4557 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 9 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: N o Comment Excerpt: IBB supports EPA's proposed rule to set ELGs for new and existing steam electric generating units. If properly designed, these guidelines can achieve significant environmental benefits without having major adverse environmental impacts on the electric power industry. Furthermore, a properly designed final rule should have positive effects by requiring worthy power plant projects that stimulate economic activity during these difficult economic times. To achieve this positive regulatory outcome, it is essential for EPA to strike the correct regulatory balance in setting the final ELGs for the seven wastewater streams at affected electric generating facilities. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Cooper Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 642 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4558 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt : I understand that government cannot and should not prohibit industry to an extent that drastically disadvantages our nation and its companies compared to others. However, we as a nation have long taken pride in being a trendsetter for standards of equa lity and public safety, among many other values. Maintaining and improving the quality of our natural resources is another purpose which I believe we should place high in our priorities, and I urge you to consider what our standards mean for not only us, b ut for the rest of the world, as they are certainly watching. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Crossan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 4559 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: My mother and Grandmother died of cancer -- what caused it no - one knows for sure but i have to think pollutants in our water arent healthy for anyone. I have two young children, ages 1 and 3, who I want to protect as much as I can. Therefore, I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewate r. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Roschke Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4560 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag : No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Every year, power plants dump billions of tons of toxic metals into the water. It is irresponsible and detrimental to the health and well - being of the citizens of this n ation, our children, and future generations to allow this.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 643 The technology exists to eliminate much of this pollution from waste water. Power plants should be required to use it. Clean water is essential to the security of the nation. Please protect it with the strongest possible rule against power plants' permission to pollute it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Schafer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4561 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Why can't we do the right thing for our environment? The United States is becoming the least evolved society on the planet not the most! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Wigmore Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4562 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: For the sake of t he country's public health, I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Wilder Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4563 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 644 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: An increasingly anxious and discouraged public needs to know that our government is working on behalf of our health and safety, rather than corporate or institutional profits. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Gaynor Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4566 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: N o External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It is time to stop and reverse wanton destruction of life, this poisoning of our biosphere. Think of your children and their children to come. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Johns Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4567 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from to xic power plant wastewater. Truly shortsighted, outrageous, very sad that protecting our environment, especially our waters, is still seen as not doable. We who block progress in cleaning our environment, and keeping it clean, will be called, and rightfull y so, eco - terrorists by our children and grandchildren.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 645 Allowing business as usual to call the shots is unacceptable, and to me, morally incomprehensible. In fact, if something isn't ecologically sensible, it isn't financially sensible. Nature is a powerfu l healing force; we humans need to change our ways to help her heal exponentially. This includes cleaning up the mess we've made of our water already, and finding ways to keep it clean: a huge exciting challenge! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Kester Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4568 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporat ed into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The more I learn about the state of our water supply, the more upset I get. I am in Michigan and the disaster that power plants have placed on our Great Lakes is beyond outrageous. Who are we helping by letting this continue? Owners?, stockholders?, I honestly don't know. Please think about the future of our water, our children and our world. Please stop the pollution before it is too late. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numbe r 1. Commenter Name: E. Laroche Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4569 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excer pt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. All waterways are connected and we must preserve the purity of our drinking water for future generations. I look forward to your leadersh ip on this issue. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 646 Commenter Name: E. Westerlund Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4570 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Ex ternal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Thank you for the excellent proposals you have made to update the intentions of the Clean Water Act and ensure the continued safety of this invaluable resource. I am writing to encourage you to please pass the most environmentally stringent guidelines for industry that you have proposed. These will cause the least harm and impact, while holding accountable those whose businesses cause a great deal of the pollution and environmental impact. With the advances in technology over the past 40 years especially, legislation meant to protect the environment quickly becomes outdated or non - specific, rendering it irrelevant. In this rapidly changing world, with mor e people and fewer resources to go around we must act to ensure that the most precious of these, water, is duly protected. I appreciate the energy and time invested in studying the various impacts that your proposals would have. I ask that you select the m ost stringent of these, to ensure that clean, drinkable, safe water is not compromised by industrial use; to ensure that Federal standards hold big business accountable; and to ensure that we will have a bright future ahead for the next forty years. Commen t Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: F. Mead Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4574 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Externa l Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We must really g et started on protecting our water -- it is essential to all life that we make an all out commitment to do so. There is no time to lose here. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 647 Commenter Name: G. Borjesson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4577 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a str ong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I think that safeguarding clean water and protecting our water sources from further pollution is one of the most important environmental protection issues of our time

— ofte n it hasn't gotten the attention it deserves. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Feder Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4578 - A1 Commen t Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With water scarcity throughout the country, we should not allow power plants to make the problem worse by lessening the quality of existing water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. J. Chepko Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4579 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Ex ternal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 648 We deserve the best possible health es pecially since we are expected to work for nothing. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Spiess Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4581 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I live o n Lake Huron and I am very concerned about our drinking water, wildlife, fish, etc. We have the knowledge about the toxic chemicals so let's clean up our water! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Baxter Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4583 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a volunt eer with the Sierra Club's Water Sentinels program, I have been learning a lot about how water quality impacts the health of people and the environment. I was disturbed to learn that even though there is better technology available to power plants to preve nt them from releasing billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into our waterways, not all plants use the latest technology. Please finalize strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution and protect lakes, rivers and streams, wildlife, and our health! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Abrahams Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 649 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4586 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants need to be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. What is the point of producing powe r if we pollute our environment? We need to put safe guards on our fragile resources before power plants, technology and greed destroy life forms forever. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Abrahams Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4587 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to fi nalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. For the health of the future, I think we have no choice but to protect our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numb er 1. Commenter Name: Unknown Mass Email Campaign Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4588 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response : No Comment Excerpt: New Effluent Limitation Guidelines need to set a standard for zero discharge of toxic heavy metals to the waters that communities nationwide depend on for drinking, fishing and recreation.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 650 Water pollution from coal - fired power plant s is a huge problem in the Southeast, where over 450 coal ash dumps scattered throughout the region contain 118 billion gallons of the toxic waste. That’s enough to cover 275,000 football fields one foot deep. Today’s power plant water pollution standards are woefully out of date, and 4 out of 5 plants lack any limits on the toxic metals they are allowed to emit. There are several known cases where this wastewater is discharged directly into drinking water reservoirs such as Mountain Island Lake in Charlott e, NC. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Kelly Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4590 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Fl ag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Even the DoD acknowledges that water may eventually cr eate tensions throughout the world. Let's start to protect! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Ursula R. Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4591 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a biomedical researcher and a citizen, I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Sound scientific research clearly shows that these compounds can and do affect human health. We learn more every day and the current trend of research shows that stricter standards are needed to protect people.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 651 Co mment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. and J. Field Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4595 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag : No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Please take these concerns seriously the future of the next generation depends upon your courage! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Blevins Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4597 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I consider the r ight to clean water to be one of my inalienable rights. Please protect this finite and vital resource from corporate greed. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. C. Corliss Commenter Affilia tion: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4598 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 652 Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to prote ct our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It is an outrage that these companies have been allowed to continue their practices long past the goal of eliminating all water pollution by 1985. Comment Response: See response to DCN EP A - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Enblom Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4599 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpor ated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It is not realistic to assume that this national issue should be left to individual state rule making and enforcement, as the priority for environmental protection is so highly variable throughout the United States. Power plant pollution is frequently a cross - border pollution problem as well. These are some of the very important reasons for the creation a nd funding of the USEPA. To uphold the public trust and demonstrate that large corporate interests do not set the agenda for environmental protection and restoration, it is imperative that USEPA take the appropriate actions to address power plant discharge s. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Harrell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4600 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag : No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I'm doing what I can to reduce my electricity usage and I average just 7kwh per day. That's one fourth the national average per EIA website. I'm doing my part so the pow er company can do it's part too. Besides, it's just plain stupid to pollute water. You're smart right? Do the right thing. Thank You.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 653 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Maselli Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4602 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This is a joke. We shouldn't have to s end letters demanding responsibility in taking proper care of waste practices for Power Plants, this should be automatic procedure. The future generations of people and wildlife rely heavily on the actions/choices we're making NOW concerning this serious i ssue. Please do your part in ensuring the environment is not damaged by Power Plants or other energy provider agencies. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. McCarthy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4603 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect the health of North Carolina's communities and environment. By requiring coal plants to move hazardous coal ash with dry systems, rather than with water, the EPA can eliminate millions of gallons of dangerous ash wastewater every year. Smokestack scrubber sludge can also be treated using zero - discharge systems, and certainly requires at least biological and chemical treatment to remove toxic heavy metals like selenium, arsenic, mercury, and lead. It is evident that coal ash poses a significant threat to th e health of North Carolina's communities and environment. The Environmental Protection Agency should require power plants to use the best available technology to reduce pollution. There is no reason that we should not embrace the most comprehensive and adv anced methods for handling hazardous wastes. Implementing the technology creates new employment opportunities. Providing a clean environment for future generations alleviates future healthcare costs. The time to invest in proper regulation and up - keep tech nology is now.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 654 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. McClory Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4604 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a US citizen, mother and grandmother, I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater for the sake of future generations. Common sense and common decency dictates that Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exce rpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Jeff Udd Commenter Affiliation: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4606 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporate d into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The MPCA supports the revision of these regulations by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to maintain up - to - date federal standards to which dischargers in this category of point sources will be subject. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Gag Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4609 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 655 I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We only have one earth. Please protect her. For her sake and the sakes of all life... Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Possner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4611 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Externa l Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I worked as an attorney in a federal agency for 30 years and am nonetheless appalled that EPA has not yet adopted rules to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. This letter arises because Clean Water Action has reminded me of the situation, but I'm regularly angered by news items that describe this sort of regulatory capture. At times it seems we're prepared to neglect ou r remaining natural resources in ways that better suggest 19th century practices. The best available technology should be required to reduce the amount of pollution, not just by power plants but by industrial processes such as fracking that compromise our water quality. Every year, power plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It’s time to end this. I can't imagine what 'cost - benefit' analysis justifies the burden on present and future generations of the ex isting exemption. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Simester Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4612 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge the EPA to finalize rules that regulate power plant discharges of harmful pollutants into our streams, lakes and rivers, many of whic h are sources of our drinking water. I consider our need for safe potable water to be the highest priority and one our federal government should protect.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 656 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K . Yoshida Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4613 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to fina lize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.?From our history, we all know what would happen when we have water contamination. We have learn a lot from our passed mistake. It's time to stop pollution once a nd all. Thank you very much for your hard work. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Ehrenfeld Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4616 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It is unc onscionable that those elected to help the populace and keep them safe allow just the opposite to happen. The national goal was to be clean 28 years ago! What a sorry state of affairs. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerp t Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Hays Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4617 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 657 Comment E xcerpt: I think if the founding fathers of this country ever imagined that clean water, air, & land would be in jeopardy, they would have penned in rules in our constitution. Water is so critical to a healthy society. It is common for westerners to be en amored with our new technologies, causing us to turn a blind eye on some of their effects. When the honeymoon is over, it's time to insure power plants and new technologies in general clean up there act to guarantee clean water & air, the basics for life. You have the power to do this now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Selby Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4618 - A1 Comment Excerpt N umber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. As a retired nurse, I consider this to be an urgent health concern! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. A. Barrett Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4619 - A1 C omment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 658 Act now before it is too late! we cannot live without clean water!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. De Witt Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4621 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wa stewater. Clean water is essential for life! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Fedyszyn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4623 - A1 Comm ent Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We have a responsibility to take care of our planet, not just for our children and grandchildren, but because we are capable o f making changes that can positively impact the health of our rivers and streams now, the ecosystems around them, and our own health. Sometimes it takes a little more effort to do the right thing, but that's no excuse not to do it. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Thank you for protecting the resources of our planet. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Kerwin Co mmenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 659 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4625 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Living in Michigan, water qual ity is important to me as it should be to everyone, so I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Comm enter Name: M. MacLeod Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4626 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I ur ge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Please attend to the welfare of the people and other living beings. We have standards. All should follow them. Comment Response: See response to D CN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Mallon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4627 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Your charge is to protect our water. Please compose the strictest rule to do so. In particular, wastewater that is toxic from power plants needs to be addressed. I would rather pay more for my power than to lose our rivers and lakes.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 660 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Swanson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4628 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number : 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: If you don't take action to protect our water, then there is no reason to believe you are doing your duty owed to Michigan and its citizens. Do the right thing and get out of the pocket of big energy companies. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Maher Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 4630 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastew ater. Protect our water now; it is the major commodity of the future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Pamela F. Faggert Commenter Affiliation: Dominion Resources, Inc. Document Control N umber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4631 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 661 We have reviewed the proposed rule and support several elements of the proposal such a s flexibility for flue gas desulfurization (FGD) wastewaters, the exemption for oil fired units, and no additional controls for existing bottom ash transport water, leachate, and non - chemical metal cleaning wastes. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Pamela Ritger Commenter Affiliation: Clean Wisconsin Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4632 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 11 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review I ncorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: the adoption of stringent effluent limits on toxic metals and other pollutants is extremely important for the state of Wisconsin and the Great Lakes region. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Hoey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4635 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into R esponse: No Comment Excerpt: I am sending along this Clean Water Action broadcast letter to indicate my strong support for ANY legislation that aims at keeping our water sources clean and SAFE. Because so much of our water supply is under ground, we don' t see how pollutants are getting into it every day. We need to create a national consciousness to preserve and protect our water, just like our consciousness to keep our air clean and smoke - free! And apparently, we need Federal laws to criminalize delibera te water pollution. If that is what it takes, then let's do it. There is no time to waste. I therefore I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 662 Commenter Name: R. Strasser Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4638 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please enact the strongest possible rules and standards to protect our waters from power plant waste water. Fresh water is a finite resource that belongs to us all. Please don't let corporate profits determine what is allowable, rather use the ideas of the common good and public health and require power plants to use the best available technology to protect all the waters of the US. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excer pt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. W. Glassley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4639 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No C omment Excerpt: Clean and safe drinking water is the most important issue of or time. We must protect this vital necessity now. For us and for our children's future we must do this. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and st reams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Ray Johnson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4640 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: There have to some kind of standards to control the dumping of waste that are meaningful. If these companies are dumping such thin gs into our water supplies or areas where the water tableEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 663 will spread them, it has to stop. At some point, and pretty soon the way we are going, there will be no clean, uncontaminated water left. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Ray Johnson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4640 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: There have to some kind of standards to control the dumping of waste that are meaningful. If these companies are dumpi ng such things into our water supplies or areas where the water table will spread them, it has to stop. At some point, and pretty soon the way we are going, there will be no clean, uncontaminated water left. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Brown Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4642 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The citizens of the US and our entire planet deserve and need clean water systems. We have the means and desi re to do so, but our country (and others) insanely continue to make decisions based on money, power and greed. This has to stop!! I strongly urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comm ent Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 664 Commenter Name: S. Brown Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4642 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The citizens of the US and our entire planet deserve and need clean water systems. We have the means and desire to do so, but our country (and others) insanely continue t o make decisions based on money, power and greed. This has to stop!! I strongly urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Viola Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4643 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We only have one Earth. It is always the better approach to prevent contamination of our precious resources/world than to tr y to clean up after contamination. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Post Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4644 - A1 Comment Excerpt Nu mber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. This may mean more expensive ut ilities for citizens but the cost of spoiling ourEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 665 natural resources is a higher price to pay than a charged iPad and HDTV running from cheap energy because environmental protection is sacrificed for sake of price. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Ganbari Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4645 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpor ated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Water is too precious to risk. We are expected to not have enough to go around within 30 years. None of us can survive without healthy water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Euston Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4646 - A1 Comment Ex cerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I live a couple of miles from the Duke Energy power plant in Arden. Our view includes visible plumes of steam escaping from their st acks on a somewhat regular basis. Also, the noise from their operation is audible weekly. Although our property does not abut the immediate area, we are about a mile from Lake Julian and are very concerned about pollution, in general, and specifically coal ash pit pollution escaping into our waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. D. Fosburr Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4647 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 666 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is alarming to discover just how toxic our food and water is rendered by the coal power industry. As an educator, I see physical environmental factors as a key player in learning difficulties, especially potent neurotoxins like methylmercury; when there is exposure to a human at an early age. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater, specifically from the heaviest polluting coal burning plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Jackson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Documen t Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4648 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. This is a no - brainer for so many people. Please do your JOB! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Wall Com menter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4649 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We are entitled to clean water and our lives depend on it.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 667 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Martinat Co mmenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4650 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Stringent standards to limit a ll power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer!!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: John A. Patterson et al. Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4653 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As health professionals we would like to articulate our concern around the lack of standards for power plant water effluents. Power plants are a significant source of harmful pollutants including arsenic, mercury, lead, boron and manganese. Many of these toxic pollutants, once in the environment, are persistent, can travel throughout the food chain, and accumulate in our bodies. Human exposures to these metals are linked to cancer, neurological damage and developmental disorders. Regulations to reduce harmful air emissions from power plants are good; however some pollution reduction technologies can ultimately result in higher concentrations of heavy metals in coal ash. While air quality has improved, standards for water quality have not kept pace. Access to clean water is a foun dation of a healthy population in Kentucky and throughout the nation. Physicians, nurses and public health leaders all know that it is better to prevent illness than it is to repair what damage to our health has already been done. The same is true for our environment, including the water on which we all depend. Please help clean up our nations waterways and protect public health by establishing effective effluent standards.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 668 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Unknown Mass Email Campaign Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4654 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge the EPA to issue strong standards that will keep billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium from toxic power plant wastewater out of our rivers, lakes and streams. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: James D. Taft Commenter Affiliation: Association of State Drinking Water Administration (ASDWA) Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4668 - A2 Comment Excerpt Numbe r: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a general comment and observation, we believe this regulation is very much needed -- and, to some extent, overdue. Steam electric power pla nts produce numerous waste streams that have the potential to contaminate drinking water supplies, yet the guidelines have not been reviewed and revised since 1982. In the intervening period, we have collectively learned more about the impacts of these dis chargers as well as effective technologies and approaches for controlling them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: James D. Taft Commenter Affiliation: Association of State Drinking Water A dministration (ASDWA) Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4668 - A2 Comment Excerpt Number: 5 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 669 Comment Excerpt: Protection of drinking water supplies from pol lution is the first line of defense in ensuring that safe and affordable water is available to our nation’s consumers. Updating the current steam electric power generating point source category effluent guideline represents an important opportunity to stre ngthen that protection for all Americans. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Juliet Cohen Commenter Affiliation: Chattahoochee Riverkeeper Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4671 - A2 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The U .S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing a new regulation that would stren gthen the controls on discharges from certain steam electric power plants by revising technology - based effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the steam electric power generating point source category. The proposed rule will improve the water qu ality of the Chattahoochee River and its tributaries and the health of those people and wildlife that depend on the river by requiring the treatment and removal of harmful , toxic pollutants that are currently being discharged without adequate monitoring o r treatment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Unknown Mass Email Campaign Commenter Affiliation: Unknown Mass Email Campaign Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4679 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge EPA to finalize strong Effluent Limitation Guidelines for Steam Electric Power Generating plants requiring ze ro discharge. Electric utilities claim controlling their pollution is too costly. But failing to control pollution isn’t free; the public pays for this pollution. Technology to control power plant water pollution is currently available and widely used by other industries. All power plants, no matter their size, should be held to the sameEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 670 standard that protects the waters we all depend on for drinking, fishing, agriculture and recreation. Here in the Southeast we have over 82 power plants that manage massiv e coal ash impoundments

– enough, in fact, to cover 275,000 football fields in one foot of the toxic waste. These represent 40% of all coal ash impoundments nationwide and our region is home to almost half of those impoundments rated “high hazard” by the E PA. It is essential that we have strong effluent limitations in order to ensure protection of our water resources that are fundamental to life. Please pass strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution to improve the health of rivers and strea ms, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Thomas Cmar Commenter Affiliation: Earthjustice, et al. Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4684 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Each day across the United States, coal - burning power plants dump millions of gallons of wastewater loaded wi th toxic pollutants like arsenic, boron, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, and selenium into our rivers, lakes, and streams. This pollution is discharged directly from the power plant; flows from old, unlined surface impoundments or “ponds” that many plan ts use to store toxic slurries of coal ash and smokestack scrubber sludge; and seeps from unlined ponds and landfills into ground and surface waters. Coal combustion wastewaters contain a slew of toxic pollutants that can be harmful to humans and aquatic l ife in even small doses. Due to the bio - accumulative nature of many of these toxins, this pollution persists in the environment, and even short - term exposure can result in long - term damage to aquatic ecosystems. In short, coal plant water pollution has s erious public health consequences and causes lasting harm to the environment. Despite the scope of this pollution problem, EPA is proposing to update the Effluent Limitation Guidelines (“ELGs”) for this industry for only the first time since 1982. The ex isting ELGs for power plants are over thirty years old and fail to set any limits on toxic discharges in coal combustion wastewaters. Even in 1982, when EPA finalized its last revisions to the Steam Electric ELGs, the Agency acknowledged that future revis ions would be necessary to address wastewaters from air pollution control systems, specifically FGD systems that are now being installed at coal - burning power plants in increasing numbers to comply with new Clean Air Act regulations. 4Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 671 4 47 Fed. Reg. 52,290, 52,291 (Nov. 19, 1982). Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Thomas Cmar Commenter Affiliation: Earthjustice, et al. Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4684 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 212 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: For all of the reasons set forth above, and in the appendices and exhibits submitted by Commenters as attachments to this letter, the undersigned Commenters strongly urge EPA to finalize Steam Electric ELGs that fully comply with the Clean Water Act’s requirements no later than May 2014. To satisfy its responsibility under the Clean Water Act to curb dangerous coal pla nt water pollution and protect public health and our waters, EPA must choose Option 5 or, at a minimum, Option 4 as the basis for the final rule. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Thomas Cm ar Commenter Affiliation: Earthjustice, et al. Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4686 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 5 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The proposed steam electric ELGs will protect the environment, save human lives, and play a critical role in bringing to fruition the Clean Water Act’s ultimate goal of eliminating pollution in U.S. surface waters. The most stringent of the regulatory options

— Options 4 and 5

— would eliminate more water pollution from power plants, do more to protect the environment, and save more human lives than would their less stringent “preferred” counterparts. In its 2009 detailed study of the steam electric industry, EPA made clear the importance of updating these ELGs.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 672 New, more stringent ELGs are a first step towards reversing damage done by past pollution, and a down payment on the well ‐ being of future generations. Pollutants from steam electric generating units into U.S. surface wat ers dwarf pollutants from all other ELG industrial categories. The steam electricity industry releases 8.3 million lb ‐ eq of toxic ‐ weighted waterborne pollutants each year. The two next most polluting industries

— pulp, paper and paperboard, and petroleum ref ining

— each release 1.0 million lb ‐ eq (see Table 3), and pollution from all 55 ELG categories other than steam electric combined amounts to 8.1 million lb ‐ eq. 28 The proposed ELGs would prevent further degradation of our nation’s natural environment, reduce the release of toxins that threaten endangered species, and preserve the natural beauty of our waterways. Updating the ELGs would reduce the number of illnesses, disabilities, and deaths caused by toxic pollutants. Fewer carcinogenic pollutants in our wat ers will result in fewer cancer cases and fewer deaths from cancer. Less mercury in our water will mean fewer children growing up with mental disabilities. These are invaluable benefits to our society. 28 Environmental Assessment p.3 ‐ 14, Table 3 ‐ 3, and http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/cwa/304m/upload/tsd_effluent_program_10_2011.p df Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Thomas Cmar Commenter Affiliation: Earthjustice, et al. Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4686 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 27 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Implementation of EPA’s proposed ELGs for the steam electric industry would result in cleaner water, more sustainable natural ecosystems, and better human health. Keeping arsenic, mercury, nitrate ‐ nitrite, selenium, and total dissolved solids from power generation out of U.S. waters would reduce incidence of cancer and other health effects from fish consumption; improve water quality for recreational uses and aesthetic enjoyment, as well as improve d protection of threatened and endangered species and other ecological benefits; reduce groundwater contamination and associated health risks; lower costs from combustion residual impoundment failures and water treatment, and reduced damages to commercial fisheries, tourism, and property values; reduce air emissions as a result of curtailed generation at high ‐ emission power plants; and reduce water use for power generation.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 673 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Kolodne Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4764 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We require safe disposal of unused prescription medications because of the known consequences of simply flushing them down the toilet. This exposes all of us, including wildlife to unnecessary ingestion of antibiotics, narcotics, etc. We also know that toxins are responsible for mutations in our genes and certainly are responsible for many cancers. Is there a one among us that doesn't know someone that is suffering with cancer? And what a devastating disease it is claiming many missed work days in a pers on's career as one tries to come clean from the disease. Certainly power plant pollutants improperly handled will only exacerbate the already stressed way our bodies try to stave off the ill effects of pollution in this modern world. Let's do the right thi ng and let's do it now for the sake of our own family's health and those of generations to come. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: CWA Mass Mail Campaign Commenter Affiliation: Private Cit izen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4771 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Action must be taken to protect the residents of Boulder and ot her communities from coal power plant water pollution.

 Coal - fired power plants are one of the largest polluters and contribute more than 50% of toxic pollution to our lakes, rivers, and streams  Current wastewater discharge guidelines need to be updated an d must require strong standards for limiting the amount of toxic heavy metals that can be discharged into surface water.  The majority of Colorado's drinking water comes from surface water - updating these standards will reduce our risk of exposure to toxi c heavy metals.  The proposed rule should use the best available technology and be the most protective option available.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 674 I urge you to adopt the most protective option available to keep our water pollution - free. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - H Q - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Elizabeth Cusulas Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4776 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. I understand that the standa rds have not been updated for nearly 30 years. Certainly, it's time to revisit this issue and correct the problem. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Mooney Commenter Affiliation: Privat e Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4778 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We the undersigned, urge the Environmental Protection Agen cy (EPA) to adopt the strongest possible protections on toxic coal ash and power plant water pollution. The best option proposed by the EPA is for power plants to install zero liquid discharge technology and convert to safer coal ash handling systems that will eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. The EPA, however, is currently proposing to choose a weaker option that includes less stringent standards and would fall short of what the Clean Water Act requires. Only by enacting t he toughest standards proposed will the EPA fulfill its duty to protect our environment and public health from toxic coal ash pollution. It's time the EPA created stronger federal protections for coal ash. We urge you to enforce the strongest possible stan dards on toxic coal ash pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 675 Commenter Name: Y. LeFever Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4779 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need the strongest possible rule to try to eliminate toxic metals and other hazardous chemicals that are being dumped into our waters by the power plant industry. Waters need to be cleaned up, not contaminated further. We need to ensure the safety of drinking water and to reduce the toxicity of fish. Water is our most valuable resource and the EPA should do its utmost to protect it, not only for now, but for future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Bezanson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4780 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: My spouse and I fully expect the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wa stewater. We all need safe drinking water, and it is high time to end this reckless practice. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Bezanson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4782 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 676 We have no business allowing carcinogens into our food chain when we have the technology to reduce this significantly! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Davis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4783 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I grew up in a moun tain holler in Virginia and now live in urban North Carolina. From town or country, mountains, plains or coast, we can't ignore the impact of our choices on our children or our climate in the future, near and far. I am joining with Appalachian Voices writing to urge the EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commente r Name: S. Brown Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4784 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is o ur most important resource, and vital to life. Big industry and its money should not be allowed to buy and pollute this basic human right. It's time we put the health of individuals and families first, not the interests of industry. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 677 Commenter Name: T. Hurst Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4785 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am a landscape artist who studied watersheds in a landscape architecture program. I also developed an affinity to water by growing up next to the Mississippi River. I am a survivor of three seperate cancers most likely caused by cold water creek in St Louis County which was polluted by the manhattan project. All of these have made this subject dear to my heart. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. A. Olson Comm enter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4786 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. This is a common sense issue. As an educator, how can we teach our high school students otherwise? They will never understand government willingly allowing the poisoning of na tural waters that are full of life and used for human consumption. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Hoffman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 4787 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 678 Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wast ewater. No industry whatsoever should be exempt from the utmost care and duty to protect our waterways and planet. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Speen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4789 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I believe it is our obligation to ourselves and especially our children to eliminate this polluting of our precious water. There must be solutions sought to fix this major wrong for our future generatio ns. We owe this to our kids and to our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Oppenheimer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4790 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support the proposed option that would require power plants to "dry handle" waste from both fly and bottom ash ponds and to use evaporation treatment for FGD scrubber sludge waste. I make my living as a guide on the French Broad River, a river impacted by pollution from Duke Energy's Asheville coal plant. I and my guests deserve to be able to swim and raft in clean water, n ot water polluted by arsenic and other heavy metals.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 679 Existing technology can easily solve this problem and should be employed. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Meux Commenter Affiliatio n: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4791 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We work to protect human and natural communities from the harmful impacts of water pollution every day at LA Waterkeeper. [We] urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Durham Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4792 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No C omment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. Remember what happen to PG&E in California for dumping toxic waste into the ground reservoir's. Comment Response: See respo nse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. K. Coffey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4793 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 680 Comment Excerpt: Keeping our drinking water clean may be our biggest climate priority at this time. Therefore, I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic power plant wa stewater. Please do all you can to make sure this happens. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Lettieri Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 4794 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our right to clean water, essential to life,liberty and the pursuit of happiness, trumps a corp's right to pollu te. I urge EPA to issue strong standards that will have the greatest effect of protecting our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. E. Springlett Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4795 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 3 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In conseque nce, I wish to add my voice to those advocating for an update to the current regulations so that the proposed rule is based upon the best available knowledge of the health risks; that it offer a maximum degree of protection from heavy metals being disch arged into America's water; and that it include consideration of what are the best available technologies for preventing, or at least minimizing, discharges from all sources of such toxic elements, particularly focusing on coal - fired power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 681 Commenter Name: H. Yu Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4796 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Ext ernal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Enforce the environmental law is the major point to prevent the further pollution to our drinking water system from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - O W - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Gerber Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4797 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's imperative that we update the wastewater discharge guidelines and standards for power plants to preserve the integrity and safety of our drinking water, among other concerns. The current standards are outdated and place no limits on toxic metals that flow into our lakes and streams and affect our surface water which ultimately becomes to the water my children drink. Please ensure that the proposed rule use the best available technology and be the most protective opt ion available. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Amato Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4798 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External R eview Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 682 I've recently become acutely aware of the toxicity problems associated with wastewater discharges from power plants. Specifically, I'm shocked that current gui delines for power plants place no limits on the amount of toxic metals that are discharged into our waterways . This is completely unacceptable, and hardly a believable truth for the 21st Century. It's time to take appropriate action and make use of the mo st modern and aggressive technological solutions available to prevent further pollution of our rivers, streams and lakes. These wastewater guidelines need to be updated to address all polluters, but especially coal - fired power plants which I understand con tribute over 50% of the toxic pollution to our water, so that we can ensure that our drinking water is safe. Please update the power plant wastewater guidelines with the most protective options available. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Haecker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4799 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support the efforts of Clean Water Action to improve the pollution levels of our fresh water sources. I hope the EPA takes notice and supports them as well. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. R. Sheldon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4800 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing in support of EPA's proposed rule changes to update and strengthen discharge guidelines and standards for power plants. Given that coal fired power plants are one of the largest polluters to our waterways, it would seem appropriate that the proposed rules should be up to the task.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 683 After thirty years, it is time for wastewater discharge guidelines to be updated, requiring strong standards for limiting the amount of toxic heavy metals to be discharged into surface water. Th e proposed rules should use the best available technology available. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Miller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4801 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please pass stricter rules and limits regarding the amount of polutants coal fired power plants are allowed to discharge into our waterways.We all need clean water to survive. Our children and grandchildren should not have to suffer the consequences of our actions or lack of action .They cannot survive drinking poluted water.We cannot raise healthy crops and livestock useing poluted water.The toxic heavy metals that are currently being allowed to dumped into our water supply is killing us. Please take action to protect the earth and and the water for the future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Carlie Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4802 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please protect our drinking water. Current wastewater discharge guidelines need to be updated. I'm in support of the most protective option. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Maness Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4803 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 684 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respons e: No Comment Excerpt: After reviewing sections seven and eight of the Technical Development Document listed as a supporting document (EPA - 821 - R - 13 - 002), it is clear that new technologies exist that not only effectively treat numerous sources of pollutio n that the EPA had previously considered "low volume wastes" - FGD wastewater, FGMC wastewater, gasification wastewater, and leachate - but also do so in a cost effective manner, as demonstrated by section nine of the TDD previously mentioned. Given the addi tional incentives to industry offered in section 8.1 .2. 10 to remain in compliance with these new regulations - by virtue of providing them the extra time they claim to need in order to become compliant - I see little evidence of any particular vindictivene ss toward industry and its goals. Indeed, many different types of plants exist; gauging how these incentives would perform on any particular plant in terms of cost and time is difficult. However, given the conclusions of the Benefits and Costs Analysis sup porting document (EPA - 821 - R - 13 - 004),1 believe that on the whole these regulations represent a sufficient balance between the needs of industry and the scientific realities of the negative impacts - cancer, neurological damage, ecological damage these pollu tants have on our population . No regulation is without cost to industry, but the cost to society on the whole for not instituting these regulations will continue to creep up on us as time passes, given the nature of these pollutants that ensures they will remain a hazard for decades on end. I suspect that these costs could rise well above the maximum $954 million dollars the EPA claims would be required for industry to be in compliance. I cannot in good conscience suggest that we leave future generations t o foot the bill for our actions, especially in light of the available technologies (and their relative costs) that control these pollutants that we previously had no manner of controlling. Given the extensive benefits documented by the Benefits and Cost An alysis and in light of the total cost of compliance range the EPA provides - as high as $954 million but as low as $185 million - the Maness family offers its support of the most stringent rule changes the EPA believes necessary. Comment Response: See respon se to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Wallace Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4804 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Re view Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 685 The majority of Austin citizens love going to swim in Lake Travis, the Greenbelt, and other areas. People of all ages love visiting too, including children. Therefore, the EPA must enforce a strong ru le to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater! Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce pollution, especially from heavy metals. Wastewater from coal - fired power plants is especially tox ic and gross! It contains high levels of arsenic, lead, mercury and other pollutants. Would you want your child swimming in that? Strong standards to limit ALL power plant water pollution will make the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Resp onse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Hoffman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4805 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External R eview External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I agree in urging the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Our earth is a God given gift. it is ours, yours a nd mine to protect and take care of it at all cost. ALL life is precious. The life that lives in our waters, depend on man to take care of them. No one entity can exist. Stricter standards will enable our waters to thrive, and ensure that our citizens are healthy. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Haecker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4806 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Revi ew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 686 I highly urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Ross Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4807 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ex ternal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Pollution of our waters is a very important issue. The majority of our drinking water comes from surface water. Right now, the standards are very outdated and must be changed. Current guidelines must be updated and new ones created and help eliminate toxic heavy metals that are being discharged into our drinking water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Phelps Commente r Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4808 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing you to ask you to updat e the current discharge guidelines and standards for coal fired power plants. (After all, 30 year old standards mean they are 1/3 rd of a century old!) As someone who has been ill nearly ten years due to exposure to toxins, I passionately want to save other humans and ecosystems from unnecessary harm. As someone who is educated, I am keenly aware that 50 percent of toxic pollution to our water systems are derived from coal - fired power plants. Isn't 23,000 miles of rivers and streams damaged by power plant wa stewater discharges enough? Please, on behalf of our entire nation, update the discharge guidelines and standards with the most protective options available.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 687 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Na me: K. Wheat Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4809 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Obviously wate r pollution is a very bad thing even for the people creating it. If being greedy and destroying the earth is more important to the EPA than it's sad if they don't realize the damage they are also doing to themselves. We ALL have room to grow in making this world a better place. ALL OF US! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. C. Clark Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4813 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Everything being dumped into our water then in the ocean. How are we expected to decide how to trust our government? How can we live with out trust worthy regulations? You NEED to help! This is important! Please help save the world! Because I can't because I don't have your power. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: F. R. Pater son Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4814 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 688 Your name is to protect our water, air, etc. Do not let the polluters set the rules for you and me. I don't think I will be around to die from this, but my son and grandson will feel the effects of the pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Ex cerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. C. Bosworth Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4815 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: N o Comment Excerpt: I believe the EPA should impose the strongest possible rules to protect our Great Lakes from pollution of any and all kinds! When I was young, we could drink water from them and now you, the EPA, has let them become polluted from everything from runoff to power plant discharges and ballast flushing from boats. I think you should be ashamed of yourselves for not enforcing the rules strictly enough! DO YOUR JOB!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excer pt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Cuozzo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4816 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Commen t Excerpt: I urge EPA and power plants and coal industry to protect our rivers, lakes, water we drink. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. McIntyre Commenter Affiliation: Private Citize n Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4817 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 689 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Saying the coal industry is antiquated makes it sound like a pleas antry rather than a plaque on our planet and public health. Our state has the ingenuity and knowhow to lead the renewable energy sector. But I get that we can't just flip a switch. but until that time, the EPA needs to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams, and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. McIntyre Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4817 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants need to be required to: (1) Use best available technology (and none of this clean coal cra p we all know is a fallacy). (2) Keep lead, arsenic, mercury, selenium and other toxins out of the water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. E. Fairbairn Commenter Affiliation: Private C itizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4819 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: If it is true as the clean water action organization indicate s, I strongly urge the EPA to institute a practical and effective policy that the power plants can abide by to protect our rivers and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 690 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Nu mber 1. Commenter Name: D. Leoui Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4820 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Exce rpt: Logical requirements for clean water etc. without the ridiculousness of extreme cost. You can do it in a very logical and affordable way! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Boucher Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4821 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Stop polluting our water! Protect our rivers, streams, and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Sullivan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4822 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I cannot stress enough how important it is for the EPA to enact legislation that pro tects our rivers, lakes and streams from ALL wastewater products.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 691 There is no reason why we, as citizens, should bear these costs and risks, in the form of health problems and a polluted environment. Our streams are not a garbage dump where wastes magical ly disappear, rather they are the life blood of our ecosystem, where these wastes accumulate and cause us harm. This is something we all now know, and yet the current lack of standards seems to harken back to sometime of pre - modern ignorance. Let us join the 21 st century and protect our rivers, lakes, and streams. Please enact a strong rule to protect them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Stefon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4823 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As Michigan citizens, we are promoting clean and safe water from wat ershed to water tap, working to secure, restore and protection our water now and future generations. Keeping Michigan water in Michigan, preventing toxic pollution and reducing polluted stormwater runoff, sewage overflow and failed septic tanks. Comment Re sponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Bailey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4824 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I ask you, what could possibly be more important than the quality of our life sustaining water? Especially here in Michigan? Power plants are dumping billions of pounds of toxic mater ials into our lakes, rivers, and streams. They MUST utilize every possible avenue to reduce/eliminate this practice. Will they do this of their own free will? Doubtful. Therefore, I urge you to review Docket ID. EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 and implement the EPA's power plant pollution standards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 692 Commenter Name: K. Peret Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4825 - A1 Comment Excerpt Num ber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I like to drink clean water. Such a simple statement. I dare say I need to drink clean water in order to live. I'm guessing you might appreci ate clean drinking water as well. So if we are both in agreement, why would we not go out of our way to protect our rivers from things we know to be harmful? Don't get me wrong, I like having electricity as well, but I'm guessing we could do a better jo b with making it. Why not stick with limiting the impact of toxic materials used by our power plants? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Oates Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4826 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing this letter in the hope that you will protect our river s, lakes, and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Hughey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4827 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 693 Water is critical for many things. Indeed, water is a prerequisite for life itself. It so, we must serve as stewards to the most crucial resource and guard against its degradation. We must do a much better job in protecting our streams, rivers, and especially our Great Lakes. The EPA is charged with this critical public trust function, and it need s to continually evaluate circumstances utilize the data to refresh the standards in maintaining safe water it is charged to protect. Please take all action to finalize strong rules to protect our water and appropriately prevent further unchecked contamina tion from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Parkers Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4828 - A1 Comment Excer pt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please stop power plants from dumping toxic waste into Michigan's lakes and rivers. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Spanopoulos Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4830 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is absolutely criminal how the power plants have contaminated our lakes and continue to do so. What is worse, is that nothing is being done to stop and prevent this from happening. The EPA has been completely neglige nt where Michigan's Great Lakes are concerned. It is a shame that I cannot take my grandchildren fishing in this state and enjoy cooking our catch with them. The EPA is the only organization responsible for our contaminated water in this great State and n ot only must STOP the plants from further degradation of our waters, but must clean what waters we have left.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 694 Without proper laws to prevent the power plants and anyone else from contaminating our water further, the plants are not doing anything illegal. Why shouldn't they dump their toxic waste into our water? How would the EPA like the toxic materials dumped onto their private and homes and properties? Isn't MICHIGAN all of our home? Please stop ALL dumping into all Michigan waters!!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Benton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4831 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Each year there are more incidents involving our water supplies. Any and all efforts must be used to protect our rivers, Great Lakes from toxic wastewaters. Whatever steps need to be taken to that end it is our duty to support and see that it is enforced. Stricter standards will improve our waters, and that will also ensure the waters and all of its affects on us. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numbe r 1. Commenter Name: S. Zwelter Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4833 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to go beyond the controls of sulfur dioxide emissions in cleaning up the nation's waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 695 Commenter Name: S. Shower Commenter Affiliation: Pr ivate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4834 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need strong standards to protect our water from power plant pollution. Our family uses prior lake for enjoyment in the summer months (May/Oct) approximately 3 - 4 times per week. We swim and play, and our dog drinks the water at time. The health of the water is extremely important to us to preserve own he alth and to allow for continued enjoyment in it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Beseman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4836 - A1 C omment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Protection from dumping toxic waste from power plants is critical for the survival of all species. Comment Response: See r esponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Pendleton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4837 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Exte rnal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We do not want toxic water to drink. Please clean up our water. Just look at all the strange SICKNESS that crop up. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numbe r 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 696 Commenter Name: V. E. Gustin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4838 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Exc erpt: Please protect the majesty of our greatest asset which is our fresh water. We must improve and keep all of the water safe for our future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name : L. Rashid Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4839 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants not only foul our air but they are one of the biggest water polluters. Wastewater from coal fired power plants is especially nasty it contains high levels of arsenic, lead, mercury and other pollutants. The toxics are known to cause cancer, lower children' s IQ and cause other health problems. There are no federal regulations to protect our water from these toxics. Over 23,000 miles of streams and rivers and river are already contaminated with power plant wastewater. Without strict limits EPA predicts that t he amount of toxics discharge by these plants is going to increase by 28% over the next 15 years. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. E. Moher Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docum ent Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4840 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 697 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead and mercury into surface waters, it is time to end this reckless practice. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the hea lth of river and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: V. Oddo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EP A - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4841 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The world changes very quickly, to many the fact that the EPA must finalize a STRONG rule to pro tect our rivers, streams, and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater would be disappointing to the billions of human beings to come as well as those present. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Comment er Name: P. Regan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4842 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We can an d must do better at making EPA oversight, especially through the clean contemporaneous to the pollutants resulting from the entire range of private and public activities, particularly manufacturing / exploration / waste disposal practices. The list of subs tances/compounds under scrutiny must be reviewed on a regular, more frequent schedule as to technical and toxicity based limits for known pollutants and inclusion of newly occurring compounds. Just as important, effective standards must be developed, revie wed as needed, andEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 698 rigorously enforced. The insidious practice of negotiating exceptions or "gradual compliance or even pollution credits, should be rarely, not usually employed as is now too often the case. Of particular concern are applications or by pro ducts of energy producing or extracting industries. The serious problems in this area will only intensify as conventional resources shrink and "newer" technologies are rushed into service. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Ex cerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Kahle Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4843 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comm ent Excerpt: You need to protect our drinking water sources by making a strong rule for discharge of heavy metals by power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Saville Commenter A ffiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4844 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please protect this generation and all those that follow by establishing a strong rule in preserving our waterways. Conservation of our water supply should be of utmost importance and not taken for granted. Contaminated water is NOT an option, and NOT acceptable. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Roche Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 699 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4845 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review E xternal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge the EPA to be the guardian of the water in the Great lakes and protect it from toxic wastewater produced by power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Gessner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4846 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into R esponse: No Comment Excerpt: Since pollution needs to be stopped I feel there shouldn't be a problem supporting your cause. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Gordan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4847 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge you, under NO LITTLE fanfair, t o update your guidelines concerning power plant pollution to the highest ethal standards deserving of the 21 st Century

– no longer can the 1900’s be the highest achievement of our environment’s protection. This barbarism cannot stand. I support on the hig hest proposed standard -- my water is not subject to the greedy fingers of coal fueled scame. My health, nay, my sanity, requires strong standards. Limiations on power plants that will promote "dry handling" of waste and evaporation of FGD scrubber waste a re Imperative tasks.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 700 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Holloway Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4848 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 E xternal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: No more mercury in the Great Lakes states, rivers, lakes drinking water. We value our economy, our health and our rivers and lakes as the cornerstones of our home. Please consider it our obligation and right. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Wagner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4849 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The earth cannot continue to absorb the massive quantities of toxic substances pouring out of power plants. We need legislation to lower or limit toxic waste emitted during operating periods. Our water is precious and lake levels are going down due to foreign ships (China) filling their ballast tanks with our fresh water and taking it back to China. Also bottled wa ter producers are drawing down our water table for free. Control the power plants and bottled water people. We owe it to our grandkids. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. M. Wagner Comme nter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4850 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 701 Comment Excerpt: I am concerned about the toxic su bstances going into our water. We are all aware of the mess that Gelman produced for Ann Arbor. We have to take a stand before it is too late. With all the knowledge in this area it is a no brainer that if power plants wont control themselves. We need som eone to control them. In 20 years everyone around us will be after our water. It will be more costly than oil. Please set the bar high. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Maynihan Commen ter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4851 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: My family spends a great deal of t ime around the lakes and rivers in MN. We swim, boat, fish in Michigan. Hard to believe there is not a strong regulation in place that protects these waters from having arsenic, lead, and mercury dumped into them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EP A - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Duron Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4852 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpora ted into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I was saddened to learn today that coal power plant regulations have not been put in place to reduce and even eliminate waste from knowingly contaminating our freshwater lakes and groundwater. As a lifetime Michigan resident and graduate of Michigan State University. I know firsthand the importance of this resource to our State's culture, tourism, and our States diverse wildlife. The fact that proper disposal measures exist, and these common - sense practices are not an expectation is in my opinion unacceptable. I have two young children, and during the summer,Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 702 we often vacation at Lake Charleviox and Lake Michigan. The fact that our relaxing vacation pass time may be soon overshadowed and made impossible because of in creased toxin levels is not something that I ever want to see in my lifetime or my children's. Please do what you can to put restrictions in place, and help guard our futures. I do believe coal is good for Michigan, but it needs to be responsibly used and disposed of. Thank you for your consideration. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Geoffrion Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4853 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to protect my children, grandchildren and neighbors from the toxic waste byproducts of Michigan power plant s. How can you even consider allowing power companies to discharge billions of pounds of lead, mercury, arsenic and selenium into the environment where my children and grandchildren hike, fish, garden, play and grow? How is this even an issue? I feel grea t shame and anger that the agency which is supposed to be protecting us is bowing under the pressure of sociopathically greedy and insanely self - involved business owners who care more about lining their pockets than knowing that their actions will sicken s o many with cancer and other diseases. Asking us to choose between a clean environment and energy in our homes is a false dichotomy. I demand to have both because I know that we can have both. Do your job EPA; you are our last defense against business ow ners who only care about us because we consume. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Morse Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4854 - A1 Comm ent Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 703 Comment Excerpt: We here at the Morse household love to visit Lake Michigan. I personally go mountain biking on every chance I get. The lakes and rivers keep's us all healthy. I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams, and Great Lakes from toxic wastewater. It took a law to get seat belts in cars and we need the EPA's help to protect the general public. Comment Resp onse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. R. Vort Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4855 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External R eview External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would like the EPA to protect our resources against the pollution by businesses so that those of us living in our area surrounding those businesses do not have to suffer loss of our properties and value and the health effects of pollution that can go unreported and not dealt with. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: F. M. Miller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Do cument Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4856 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am one of many extremely concerned about the risks to our clean wate r supply and the importance of that water supply for healthy living, both indoors and out of doors in North America, the United States and certainly in Colorado . I am an outdoorsman who spends a great deal of time on Colorado's South Platte River upstream and downstream from the City and County of Denver and on rivers and lakes throughout the remainder of the state. Water quality means a great deal to me and to all members of my family in Colorado and in the other western states where they live. I/We urge the EPA to finalize the strongest of rules to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. it is time to take a strong stand against the pollution that has been accumulating over the decades. Strong standards will help preserve our drinking water and ourEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 704 ability to continue to use these rivers, lakes and reservoirs for the endless recreational activities that we all enjoy and depend on in so many ways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numbe r 1. Commenter Name: D. Corsoran Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4857 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Exce rpt: I just had a young man come to my door explaining the metals that are in our power plant, going into our water. We as Americans have enough problems in our world. We have fisherman that catch fish, go crabbing, go shell fishing. Come on people, think about it, metals in our water supply and in our food. We eat it causing children to eat this mess and by the time they grow up they could develop cancer, not good. Please stop this! The pollution in our waters have to stop now before it's too late. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. E. Elsesser Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4858 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a resident of St. Clair Shores who enjoys the bounty and recreation that Michigan's Great Lakes has to offer, I'd like to offer my sup port for the EPA's finalizing a strong rule to protect the state's rivers, streams and lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. People usually assume that the industries responsible for waste disposal consider their bottom line their top priority, but we a lso know that business owners today are far more aware of the effect they have on the environment and generations to come than they have been in decades past. Let's address that. I have a two - year - old son. I vote pro - life and usually Republican or Libertar ian in every election. Why? Because I value human life above just about anything else, and while I have a deep respectEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 705 for the great minds behind capitalism, I don't think that profit and the public's quality of life are mutually exclusive. I want to be pr oud of something that my generation (and my parents' generation) leaves behind for my son's Austin's generation. If it has to start at the bottom with a grassroots campaign, then so be it. Politicians love to talk about the amazing technology and scientifi c advances that our country should be so proud of, saying it's the reason people want to immigrate here, start new lives, and attend our universities . Why aren't standards for clean water keeping up with the latest technology? I'm already uncomfortable wi th fluoride being added in my municipal water supply because of 1950s rhetoric. And I'm not an expert on the safe ppm levels of arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium, but I don't need a PhD to know that EPA standards for waste management and dumping should be evaluated as frequently as necessary, and should either keep up with or surpass the technology that industries use. If the USA is the greatest nation on earth, its government is to act solely with the interest of its citizens in mind. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. J. Bridges Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4859 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Revi ew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to move forward and finalize a strong and enforceable rule to protect our waterways, which drain directly or indirectly into the Great Lakes from toxic run - off from Power P lants. Coal contains at low levels many toxic elements including lead, uranium mercury and arsenic. However, once the carbon in the coal is consumed, the remaining ash is now quite concentrated in these pollutants, which are no longer entrained in an imper vious coal matrix. To prevent their escaping into the air power plants must install scrubbers in their exhaust stacks. It makes vey little sense to scrub the toxic metals from the exhaust stream, just to allow release into the environment though wastewater discharges, or through run - off from improperly stored piles of fly ash. In fact it makes less than no sense, as the aqueous pollutants end up in the water more efficiently than the airborne pollutants. We owe a duty to our children and grandchildren, and their descendants not to allow the Great Lakes to become any more polluted than they already are. As a resident of Michigan, surrounded by four Great Lakes, a unique resource on this earth, I feel strongly that we should be taking steps, which will have a favorable cost - benefit ratio when protecting our environment from pollutants, which are more permanent than either pesticides or radioactivity. When one is already doing most of the work to remove the pollutants from the exhaust, it makes little sense not toEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 706 insist that they be removed from the effluent water, which is well within our technical ability, and from windborne and storm water runoff, which just requires basic housekeeping skills, and the will to actually apply them . Therefore, I urge you to fin alize these rules, and in a form where they are not just window dressing. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Marschinke Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4860 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: When I heard about what was going on with the power plants polluting the rivers and lakes, I w as shocked. I'm starting to second guess how safe my water is to drink. I shouldn't have to worry about something like that. This has to change as soon as possible. It is disgusting to know that there is arsenic, lead, mercury & selenium in these waters. I can't imagine what it is doing to the fish. Please make a law/rule to stop this from happening. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Nelson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4862 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Everyday thousands of good people are drinking toxic water from coal fired p ower plants! Everyday fish and other aquatic life are contaminated with heavy metals and then we eat them. I feel like it's 1810 all over again! Please put in the strongest plan

– 5.5 billion pounds of toxic waste is crime! It won't be long before all eart h is polluted so do the right thing and give the American citizens the strongest plan possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 707 Commenter Name: A. Shell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document C ontrol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4863 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA needs to take a closer look at the regulations and standards that the power plants and factories use to "dump" waste into the water. No one wants bad water for humans or for the animals and vegetation. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. V. Wagoner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4865 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I want you to update your guidelines now! It should have been done decades ago, but it's time for it to happen. It will only make things better for everyone. As a clean water action canvasser I've spoken to many people who agree with this completely. I do enjoy being able to eat the fish an d drink the water out of the Great Lakes. So make it happen! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Resnick - Day Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 4866 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 708 We all need clean water to drink. It is an essential to all human life. The EPA must finalize a strong rule to protect our wastewater from toxic power plants, something we don't need. I want clean water for my family and generations to come, and the EPA can do the right thing. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. C ommenter Name: R. Keller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4867 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: There is no doubt in my mind that the EPA should help protect our waterways from power plant pollution. Water is our states life line and the EPA needs to help protect it. Please finalize standards to limit unnecessary pollution into our waterways and dri nking water. There are other methods that plants need to use beside dumping their waste into the water. I do not throw my trash into the streets, so please stop the pollution. Thank you for the effort! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. R. Roberts Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4868 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated in to Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is imperative that we protect our water for ourselves, the next generation, and future generations. As a community organizer, I have talked to thousands of individuals about these guidelines, and I can honestly say tha t the majority of Michiganders care deeply that we do the best we can to protect our water. That means NO compromising, no half - handed measures, and no putting this off any longer. Do the right thing, do your job, and put Americans’ health first. Comment R esponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 709 Commenter Name: A. Ford Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4869 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External R eview External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA must fulfill its obligation and responsibility to ensure wastewater from power plants is treated so that no toxic chemicals are released into clean lakes and ponds. As a Michi gan resident, I am especially concerned since our Great Lakes are the world's best source of fresh water. And yet, there are those who would weaken their (EPA) mandate to monitor power plants. We have to plan ahead on a subject

– water - so vital to us all. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Hokanson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4870 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Protecting the lakes, rivers and watershed from toxic wastewater is a priority for everyone. The EPA's mission correctly identifies the importance of protecting human health and the environment. It is within the EPA's control to set standards and as such, I urge action on strengthening limits to reduce power plant water pollution and wastewater runoff. The effect of such action would materially improve health and the sa fety of drinking water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Amiot Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4871 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 E xternal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 710 Please create standards in which power plants are required to eliminate the waste such as arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium, which is polluting our streams, rivers, and lakes. I want safe water for myself and my children. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. King Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4873 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a father of three, it is critically important to me that my children always have clean wate r and air around them. As a lifelong Minnesotan, I also understand how important clean water for swimming and fishing are to my quality of life. For these reasons, I ask the EPA to ensure we have strong rules to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic wastewater from power plants. Power plants must be required to use the best technology to reduce all water pollution possible. Every year, plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium into surface waters. For the sake of o ur children and our planet, this reckless practice must be ended immediately. Only by limiting pollution from power plants can we ensure that the health of our rivers, lakes and our children be protected. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Manturuk Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4874 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated i nto Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is my plan and request that the EPA enact the strongest requirements for the protection of our water.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 711 My feeling is the present time isn't soon enough to set more stringent standards for water discharges from power ge nerating facilities. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Hahn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4875 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Exter nal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize strong rules to protect our natural water resources from toxic wastewater generated by power plant, mining and drilling operati ons . All such operations should be required to use the best available technology to reduce groundwater and surface water contamination OR cease operation altogether AND restore the site of their operations to its natural condition. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Paxton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4876 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Extern al Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our Great Lakes, rivers and streams from power plant wastewater. Clean water is an important issue to public health and Michigan must protect al l of its water assets from the negative impacts of corporate or foreign entities. As the steward of the Great Lakes, which constitutes 1/5 th of the world's fresh water, Michigan needs strong standards to limit all water pollution, including that from power plants. It is far more expensive to allow pollution and then try to clean it up that it is to impose strict limits that will limit pollutio n to begin with. When you stop to consider where your own drinking water comes from, you may find yourself even more motivated to action.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 7 12 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. OSullivan Comm enter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4877 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a str ong rule to protect our rivers, streams and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce as much water pollution as possible. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It's time to end this reckless practice to protect our water, our public health and our Great Lakes way of life . As the steward of the Great Lakes, Michigan needs strong standards to limit all po wer plant water pollution. These stricter standards will improve the health of our rivers and lakes, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E . Rivas Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4878 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams, and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce as much water pollution as possible. Every year, these plants dump bi llions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. It's time to end this reckless practice to protect our water, our public health, and our Great Lakes way of life. How is this still happening in this day and age. Are these busi nesses producing so much revenue to make the government afraid to say "no more!? We the people say "NO MORE!" How much will the clean - up cost us, the taxpayers, in the future when the toxic levels are too high to hide anymore?Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 713 As the steward of the Great Lakes, Michigan needs strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution. These stricter standards will improve the health of our rivers and lakes, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - O W - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. A. Gearns Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4879 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporate d into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams and the Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Technology has improved over the last 20 years - every industry should be expected to. I wor k for one of the big three automotive companies. The 2025 mandate for 50 mph fuel efficiency has inspired some new and fantastic technology! Power plants should embrace the same inspiration and find new technologies to help preserve our precious waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Y. J. Roy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4880 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: N o External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge the EPA to finalize a rule that truly protects our rivers, streams, and Great Lakes

– the very symbol of our beautiful State of Michigan -- from toxic power plant wastewater. It is logical, fair and should be standard for power plants to be required to use the best available technology to reduce as much water pollution as possible. Water is perhaps the most important and impactful factor to life, and if not for the beauty of our lands, lakes, rivers, and the health of the plants and animals that live directly among these places, protect yourselves from the billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium that is dumped into our lakes, and waterways b y power plants.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 714 No amount of money or the greatest and latest filters will ever fully reverse the damage done daily to all of us. Please for the sake of our lives, your life and the future of everyone, take a stand we can believe in Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. M. Lansdown Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4882 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review E xternal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I ask that you vote in favor of this legislation which will remove an estimated 0.5 to 2.6 Billion (500,000,000 to 2,600,000,000) pounds of pollutant discharges annually and cut water use in half. There is a cost associated with this - but what is clean drinking water worth? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Rothenberger Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Cont rol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4883 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It has been over 20 years since the standards to protect our drinking water sourc es, rivers, lakes and streams have been updated. Testing has shown high levels of arsenic, lead, and mercury, and power plants that are coal - fired are the biggest contributors to those toxics through their industrial wastewater. Technology has been improve d over these 20 years that can help reduce the amount of toxics dumped into our surface waters. We would ask and urge the EPA to finalize a strict rule which requires coal - fired power plants to use the best available technology to reduce the amount of indu strial wastewater toxin significantly. We live near the Mississippi River and don't dare to eat any of the fish we catch.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 715 We understand there would be significant cost for these updates, but the health of everyone is at stake and we need to protect these r esources to the best of our ability. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Kuehner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4884 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Here in Texas we pride ourselves with the saying,"Don't Mess with Texas". Well, that goes for our nation's water as well. As the n ation's agency that is mandated to promote protection of our environment Power plants like the one operated by Austin Energy (providing electricity to Austin, Texas) should be required to use the best available technology to reduce water pollution. Please act on all of our (we citizens) behalf. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Severn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4885 - A1 Comment Exc erpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA must fulfill the spirit and letter of it's mandate and create a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from in dustrial pollutants and wastewater. Nearby my own home is a toxic Benzene spill . In central texas! Power plants and viher industries should be required to use the best available technology to reduce as much water pollution as possible. Every year, these plants pollute the earth our children shall inherit.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 716 Strong standard to limits ALL power plant water pollution and "fracking" oil and gas extraction must be enacted immediately. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Dainsberg Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4886 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Commen t Excerpt: Thank you for your recent proposal to limit power plant pollution by decreasing the amount of toxic metals and other chemicals dumped into our water. Please require power plants to clean up ALL of their pollution, not just some of it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Heath Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4887 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With the passage of the Clean Water Act in 1972 Congress set a national goal to eliminate all water pollution by 1985. We're 28 years past Congress' deadline and it is time t o end the power plant industries' unlimited permit to pollute . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Heath Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 4888 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 717 With the passage of the Clean Water Act in 1972 Congress set a national goal to eliminate all water pollution by 1985. We're 28 years past Congress' deadline and it is time to end the power plant industries' unlimited permit to pollute. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Carroll - Shier Commenter A ffiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4889 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams, and the Great Lakes from toxic power plant waste water. In protecting our water we will be stronger financially and health wise. We through recycling, research, and setting a role to help other's we will all be stronger in ways we never thought of. EPA, I believe you can be the creative, innovative agency that will be one critical area in moving us all foward, stronger and a healthier community. Believe it or not, this will make us all stronger financially as well. Comme nt Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. A. Bridges Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4890 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to move forward and finalize a strong and enforceable rule to protect our waterways, which drain directly or indirectly into the Great Lakes from toxic run - off from Power Plants. Coal contains at low levels many toxic elements including lead, uranium mercury and arsenic. However, once the carbon in the coal is consumed, the remaining ash is now quite concentrated in these pollutants, which are no longer entraine d in an imperviousEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 718 coal matrix . To prevent their escaping into the air power plants must install scrubbers in their exhaust stacks . It makes vey little sense to scrub the toxic metals from the exhaust stream, just to allow release into the environment t hough wastewater discharges, or through run - off from improperly stored piles of fly ash. In fact it makes less than no sense, as the aqueous pollutants end up in the water more efficiently than the airborne pollutants. We owe a duty to our children and g randchildren, and their descendants not to allow the Great Lakes to become any more polluted than they already are. As a resident of Michigan, surrounded by four Great Lakes, a unique resource on this earth, I feel strongly that we should be taking steps, which will have a favorable cost - benefit ratio when protecting our environment from pollutants, which are more permanent than either pesticides or radioactivity. When one is already doing most of the work to remove the pollutants from the exhaust, it makes little sense not to insist that they be removed from the effluent water, which is well within our technical ability, and from windborne and storm water runoff, which just requires basic housekeeping skills, and the will to actually apply them. Therefore, I urge you to finalize these rules, and in a form where they are not just window dressing. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. M. Elsesser Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docume nt Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4891 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a resident of St. Clair Shores who enjoys the bounty and recreation tha t Michigan's Great Lakes has to offer, I'd like to offer my support for the EPA's finalizing a strong rule to protect the state's rivers, streams and lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. People usually assume that the industries responsible for waste d isposal consider their bottom line their top priority, but we also know that business owners today are far more aware of the effect they have on the environment and generations to come than they have been in decades past. Let's address that. I have a two - year - old son. I vote pro - life and usually Republican or Libertarian in every election. Why? Because I value human life above just about anything else, and while I have a deep respect for the great minds behind capitalism, I don't think that pr ofit and the public's quality of life are mutually exclusive. I want to be proud of something that my generation (and my parents' generation) leaves behind for my son's Austin's generation. if it has to start at the bottom with a grassroots campaign, then so be it.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 719 Politicians love to talk about the amazing technology and scientific advances that our country should be so proud of, saying it's the reason people want to immigrate here, start new lives, and attend our universities. Why aren't standards for cl ean water keeping up with the latest technology? I'm already uncomfortable with fluoride being added in my municipal water supply because of 1950s rhetoric. And I'm not an expert on the safe ppm levels of arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium, but I don't need a PhD to know that EPA standards for waste management and dumping should be evaluated as frequently as necessary, and should either keep up with or surpass the technology that industries use. If the USA is the greatest nation on earth, its government is to act solely with the interest of its citizens in mind. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Moriarty Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 4892 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Sir, I urge you to finalize a strong set of guidelines to protect our vital water resources across the nation. Technologies are available and should be kept up to date by all U.S. power plants. The lethal toxins being legally dumped into our water supply is truly scary. Lead, arsenic and mercury are deadly toxins on that list. I certainly don't want it in my drink ing water, do you? And what about the health & safety of future generations? Water is one of the basics to sustain life. Please set strong and high standards for power plant pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerp t Number 1. Commenter Name: R. A. Martin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4893 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comm ent Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 720 While I do understand the concerns of industry folk - and the costs that may be implicit in upgrading plants - money is easier to come by than health. And, as a consumer of the product they are producing, I have no hesitation in saying I am willing to pay a little more for my energy, in exchange for less pollution and better health. Thanks so much for the difficult work you do. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Yang Comment er Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4894 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge you, "the EPA" to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant pollution or waste water. I believe that power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. I believe that after many yea rs of lobbying intensively, these coal power plant companies can afford to clean up their own trash. I believe that it should be common sense for them to take care of it since they are the ones that have caused it. I also believe that as representative of the Environmental Protection Agency, it is your duty to regulate and help sustain and protect our environmental or the health of the earth. It is time to end this reckless practice. Strong standards to limit all power plants water pollution will improve th e health of rivers and streams. Making the water we all drink and the fish we al eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Shea Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4895 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 721 Please pass the strongest rule to present toxic coal ash and related pollutan ts from getting into our rivers and waterways. Don't delay. It's much harder to try to clean it up then prevent it in the first place. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. H. Hernandez Comm enter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4896 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Snyder Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4898 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please make sure that you go ahead wit h your plans to limit the water pollution from power plants. Please stay strong in your efforts to protect our water supplies from pollution. We are counting on you to protect our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exce rpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Williams Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4899 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Com ment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 722 We are gathered here today in sadness, because the fresh clean water we all know and love is dead. Killed by toxic power plant wastewater. And whose fault is it? Well, some of you think it was no one's fault. But, if I had to say, I would c hoose EPA because they had the power to stop it with new rules to limit power plant water pollution. But they didn't. Ordinary people wanted to help. People wrote letters. They tried to convince EPA to make new rules. But they didn't. That's why our fresh water is dead. And that's what the future looks like for fresh water if EPA doesn't make new rules . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. and T. Stingley Commenter Affiliation: Private Ci tizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4900 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am happy to support the Clean Water Act, and am writing to d emand that the EPA act immediately to protect the integrity and potability of our rivers, streams and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. As Ansel Adams so rightfully observed, it is a shame that we have to beg our government to protect our env ironment. There is much more that can be done, and we are tired of having to constantly accept the very bare minimum that politicians always see fit to do in response to our urgent requests. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265 , Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Rye Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4901 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize strong rules to protect Texas rivers, lakes, and stream from toxic power plant waste water.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 723 Production and pollution always seem to go hand - in - hand, but with the proper rules and regulations, this doesn't have to b e so. With the proper standards that every plant in Texas should strive for, the pollutants dumped into our surface water can be drastically reduced. Pollution starts on the surface, but it ends up in the water we drink and bathe in, not safe. If new rules and technology can prevent this, why not use it? Improving the health of rivers and lakes in Texas will in turn improve the health of the people that live here. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Rivas Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4902 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing this letter in hope that someone will be willing to help keep my air and water clean from the dangerous toxins produced by power plants. I am a young Texan who hopes to be able to grow and prosper in my State. I love it here in Texas. the uniqueness of t he land and the people that make up our borders is something to be proud of. Each of us take pride in Texas, so why doesn't our government? When I was young, I remember going to the beach in Corpus Christie. It was one of the few family vacations we could afford to go on and I loved it so much. I remember playing in the sand with my mother and riding in a boat with my brother. Recently, I returned to Corpus Christie to discover that the place where one of my best childhood memories, had become a dump full o f trash and toxins from a nearby power plant. The natural beauty of Texas was gone and all that was left was a dark, gloomy city struggling for the life it once had. I know this letter wasn't much, but it is a cry from a young Texan asking that someone in charge do the right thing. Help your people. Protect your land. We can't keep letting the power plants take away what makes us who we are. Have a good day. God Bless Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commen ter Name: S. L. Callan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4903 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 724 Plea se stop poisoning our water. Water gives everything life, but if it is not clean, you are contributing to ECO - MURDER! Please have stricter rules for plants and replace them with healthy alternatives. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Wassenaar Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4904 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Revi ew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Environmental issues are important to me. It's time to curtail this practice and protect our water, our public health, and our Great Lakes natural resources. As a steward of the Great Lak es, Michigan in particular needs strong, enforcible standards to limit power plant water pollution. Thank you for your consideration. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Elin Commenter Aff

iliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4905 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Certainly well documented studies and sim ple common sense sufficiently justify an immediate stop to reckless, unregulated waster water dumping. As the steward of the Great Lakes, Michigan needs effective, responsible and strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution. These stricter st andards will improve the health of our rivers and lakes, ensuring a safer water and food supply. Thank you for your immediate and meaningful attention to this matter.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 725 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Comme nter Name: E. Eide Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4906 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I do support all efforts involving the EPA to have strong legislation to protect our watershed from toxic power plant wastewater. The longer we wait to enforce reasonable limits the more expensive it will be to fix down the road. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Souza Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4907 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I want stronger rules on toxins in wastewater from power plants. We're poisoning ourselves and it needs to stop. We have the technology to have energy and clean water. Please, act to protect the people of these United States from needless harm. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Mooney Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4908 - A1 Comment Exc erpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 726 Comment Excerpt: Our rivers, lakes and streams need to be protected. I expect clean water for myself and for the generations that come after me. I exp ect a sustainable society and a future I and my fellow citizens can be proud of. I would like to grow old knowing my fellow citizens have left the planet in as good of a condition as possible so the future generations can live in freedom from fear of death from our mistakes. I would like for the laws of the country to be made to protect its citizens from irresponsible behavior; including those who would do physical harm by force or practice. Please take care of this greatest nation which has until now afforded us peace, liberty, strength and happiness. Please do not allow those who could do us harm to be able to pollute our waters to be able to pollute our waters to the extent that we may not continue our prosperity. It is important that we have utiliti es that create power and maintain our standard of living. I accept the industries which have unpleasant by - products. I only ask that the disposal of these by products be conducted in a safe and secure manner. I fear that legislation is the only way to prov ide for this security. I support the initiative to legislate clean water protection. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Kalitis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Nu mber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4909 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly encourage and support stronger legislation and more diligent enforcement of laws that regulate and protect Michigan's most vital resource, its clean water. Corporate power and industrial pollution cannot be allowed to continue unfettered and weakly regulated. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. E. Rude Jr. Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4910 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 727 Com ment Excerpt: I had no idea that our lakes and waterways were so polluted. I recently read that the Detroit Edison plant in Monroe, Mi doesn't even monitor levels of Lead, arsenic or Selenium. I am was shocked to know that Nationally about 25% of all sur face water is listed as impaired, and 38% of surface water has fish unsafe to eat, I love to fish. . And eat my catch. . . there has to be something done about all this unsafe dumping. I also learned that there are nine power plants in Michigan that freely dump there waste into surface waters which aren't monitored for lead. or other cancer causing carcinogens. It time to start a new practice of responsibility for what is being dumped into our waters... The EPA needs to have tougher guidelines for these pla nts to comply by, not skimming over what is just ok if it goes into our waters, but to completely remove these heavy metals before they get into our lakes, and other surface waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt N umber 1. Commenter Name: S. Wilkey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4911 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please exert all possible influence to strenthen the CWA and SWDA for the health and well being of all who use water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Doornbos Commenter Aff

iliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4912 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 728 Please exert all possible influence to st renthen the CWA and SWDA for the health and well being of all who use water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Crider Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EP A - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4913 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our Great Lakes and surrounding waterways fr om toxic power plant wastewater. There is no excuse for our irresponsible behavior anymore. There are alternative technologies and we must step - up and make the right choices. It is up to our legislators to make these decisions to protect us from large com panies. Please take the time to consider these issues, and may you have the will to make an unpopular decision if needed. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. R. Kdohl Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4914 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a user of our Great Lakes and River s and as an avid fisherman, the pollutants released by these plants effect the wildlife and ecosystems in a profound and long - lasting manner. Stronger standards are obviously needed to protect these valuable resources. Comment Response: See response to DC N EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. M Sdao Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4915 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 729 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Inco rporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: On behalf of my entire family we urge the EPA to do the right thing !! Protect our rivers, streams and lakes from TOXIC powerplant waste being dumped into our water, our GREAT LAKES . This is water we need to drink !! This is water our wildlife and nature needs to survive. And so on and so on !! It's unfathomable that this is even an issue !! Are you kidding me ?? Please get on the stick EPA and finalize a strong set of rules about dumping. Put safety proced ures in place for our protection. Save our water !! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: F. Morgan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4916 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The standards for power plant waste removal are grossly outdated. Stronger regulation needs to be put in place to help save our environment and ourselves from such pollution. I want clean water for me, and for my family. Please work towards cleaner energy for us all. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Dom browski Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4917 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 730 As a resident and ad vocate, I feel it is my responsibility to urge the EPA to set a strong standard to protect our water and Great Lakes of Michigan and surrounding area from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce as much water pollution as possible. Protection against toxins such as arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium should be a priority to protect the future of all living things. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Num ber 1. Commenter Name: R. Orsborn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4918 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Exc erpt: Clean water is necessary for our survival. Current dumping from coal fired water plants can cause cancer, lower children's IQ and cause other health problems, and could cause pollution that will not be reversible. Current practices are causing harm to healthy water sources, human health and wild life preservation. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce as much water pollution as possible. As the steward of the Great Lakes, Michigan needs strong standards to li mit all power plant water pollution. These stricter standards will improve the health of our rivers and lakes, making the water we drink and fish we eat safer. I hope the EPA will take these concerns seriously and take action to protect the health of Unite d States citizens - those who are alive currently, as well as for future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Wurfel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4919 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 731 As a fisherman and a person who appreciates and loves the surroundings we are so luck y to have, I urge the EPA and the state of Michigan to protect our waterways from pollution, invasive species, and those surrounding us that would take advantage of and trivialize one of the most unique places on earth. My wife and I have lived here our entire lives, and one our greatest joys is to travel this beautiful state and enjoy what the world's grandest fresh water lakes have to offer. Please consider the long term benefits of maintaining the quality of this resource not just for us, but for gener ations to come. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. O. Weaver Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4920 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Exte rnal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect the rivers, streams, and lakes. The Great Lakes State should be that. It should be a pl ace where the lakes are a great place to take your friends and family. We are so blessed to have these wonderful lakes and rivers that are around our state. I once again urge the EPA to issue and finalize a strong rule to protect our Greaet Lakes and bod ies of water from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Zylstra Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4921 - A1 Co mment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am deeply concerned about global warming and what we should be doing to limit it. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams, from toxic power plant wastewater, support energy policies that create jobs and protect our water and our air and limit global warming. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 732 Commenter Name: N. Palley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4922 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to ask you to finalize a strong rule to limit all power plant water pollution. We are told to limit the amounts of fish we eat because of pollution. Pregnant women are told not to each fish at all! How can you justify allowing this to conti nue when we know there are ways to stop it? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. K. Howard Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4923 - A1 Comm ent Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to encourage you to protect this planet from corporations who are polluting this land, water (land, oceans and ri vers) and our AIR with all types of pollution. This while they give their executives huge salaries and bonuses versus finding better ways to STOP these POLLUTIONS. Our Great Lakes is the ONLY fresh water lake and the destruction is killing our fish, anima ls. Oil has polluted several of our rivers in Michigan due to companies who prefer to award their executives instead of caring for the water ways. Please, I ask the EPA needs to move forward and finalize strong rules to protect our earth, rivers, lakes, st reams and air including Michigan. Great Lakes from the toxic power plants, garbage dumps, and wastewater plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Hosler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4924 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 733 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is imperative that the EPA makes final and enforces a str ong rule to protect our greatest asset, the Great Lakes from the excessive toxins and pollutants currently dumped from power plants and other facilities lining our waterways! As better technology comes available, the EPA has the responsibility to ensure th e contaminants released are at a minimum! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. C. Ellis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4925 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Great Lakes waters need EPA protection from the pollution generated by toxic power plant wastewater. Modern technology provid es the means to better protect the Great Lakes and it should be required rather than letting power plants slide by on regulations from 1982. We deserve better than having billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium dumped into the waters we rely on for life just to add to someone's corporate profits. Please finalize strong rules to protect our Great Lakes waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Thomas Commenter Affiliatio n: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4927 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 734 The EPA should look at its name and realize that its job is Protection. Too many standards have been relaxed in favor of industrial "requests" (most recently those on allowable radiation levels in power plant emissions). I hope the EPA will loosen its industrial fetters and finalize a strong rule protec ting our surface waters from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. L. Straub Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4929 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge the EPA to finalize a powerful rule to protect our environment from toxic powe r plant wastewater. Limiting power plant water pollution through strong, clear standards should improve the environment in terms of drinking water, fishing and the general health of our water ways. It is my understanding that the latest current technology can be used and should be required to reduce pollution from hazardous materials being dumped into surface waters. The price of the technology can only be considered small compared with the long term health of ourselves and our children. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Chapman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4930 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In order to keep our lakes, rivers and streams safe and free from toxic power plant wastewater, I urge you to finalize a strong rule to require power plants to use the best available technol ogy to reduce pollution, ZERO toxins would be appreciated. Our future depends on everyone being responsible in keeping our water safe for drinking and recreation. I want my grandson to be able to know that all our water is safe and free of toxins.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 735 Please s top all practices of dumping toxins in our water. I am doing my small part to not have toxins go into our water; I hope you will as well, but make it big! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Lemmen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4931 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please protect our water. Stop power plants from dumping toxic waste into the water systems. It's simple. We need water to survive. Without clean water, we die. We need stricter laws to keep our water supply clean for us, for our kids and the generations after them. Being `allowed' to dump gallons and gallons of poison into our lakes, rivers and streams is unacceptable. They do it because they can. Force them to find another way to dispose of that toxic waste. Today. Not tomorrow. Today. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: O. Thompson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4932 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Stop power plants from dumping toxic waste into the water systems. It's simple. We need water to survive. Without clean water, we die. We need stricter laws to keep our water supply clean for us, for our kids and the generations after them. Being'allowed' to dump gallons and gallons of poison into our lakes, rivers and streams is unacceptable . They do it because they can. Force them to find another way to dispose of that toxic waste. Today. Not tomorrow. Today.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 736 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Thompson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4933 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Rev iew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please protect our water. Stop power plants from dumping toxic waste into the water systems. It's simple. We need water to survive. Without clean water, we die. We need stricter laws to keep our water supply clean for us, for our kids and the generations after them. Being 'allowed' to dump gallons and gallons of poison into our lakes, rivers and streams is unacceptable. They do it because they can. Force them to f ind another way to dispose of that toxic waste. Today. Not tomorrow.Today Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Stressman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4934 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: Legal External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please, please update protection for our rivers and lakes here in Michigan (1982? come on

– it's 2013). Als o I heard some industry in Indiana is polluting way over the mercury limit in Lake Michigan because they were given permission on State level (??). Have you heard that? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Com menter Name: M. Vitagliano Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4935 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 737 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In an effort to assure we stop pollution, I beg the EPA to draw up and put into ACTION a strong rule/law to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from further toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Ex cerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Elizabeth (surname illegible) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4936 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated i nto Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am very concerned about the quality of our water. The excessive amounts of pollutants that are allowed into our water system is horrifying. Factories and power plants tax our water supply and I would like to see action take place to support our precious resource. Power plants waste water contains high levels of toxins that are dangerous to all forms of life. Please take action to restrict and clean - up this pollution for us and future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Pluta Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4937 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review E xternal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to do everything in its power to protect all our water resources. If its wastewater from coal - fired power plants thats doing harm, please do everything you can to stop this pra ctice now. Clean potable water is our greatest asset and should be protected at all costs. The EPA mustEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 738 enforce all existing pollution standards and seek to enact even higher standards deemed necessary. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. H. Montgomery Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4938 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: EPA must not allow coal - powered electric generation plants to pollute our waters with heavy metals and other toxins. These power plants are going to have to upgrade their cleanup equipment and filtering systems to the point at which they dump exactly none of the coal residue into our water, even if they have to increase the charge for kilowatt hour to cover it, or stop using coal altogether and get the research done to replace coal with sun, wind, earth, even air (remem ber Nicola Tesla?). Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. H. Montgomery Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4938 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: If the USA is the smartest country in the world, then it's time to cut the pollution of our water down to nothing and protect our citizens from lead poisoning and who - knows what else power plants sneak into our water supply. If we are doubtful we are the smartest, let's find the countries who are successful and copy their best systems. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 226 5, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 739 Commenter Name: K. Wadland Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4939 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge the EPA to adopt a strong rule to protect our national waters from toxic power plant wastewater. It is time to stop our power plants from contaminating our surface waters with heavy metals like mercury, arsenic, and le ad. I addition, it's time we limited pollution by plants in the same way we have cut back on pollution from vehicle. Please establish strong standards limiting all power plant pollution. We need to improve and guard the health of our water and air to keep our people and country strong. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Vahlsing Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4940 - A1 Comment Excerpt Nu mber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need stringent regulations to protect our fragile lakes, rivers, and streams. This includes regulations ensuring that power plants use th e most effective technology to reduce their pollution to the lowest possible levels. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: name illegible Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4941 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 740 Clean water is a valuable resource that will not maintain itself with a hands - off policy. we need to ensure that our water is protected, as far as we are able to do so, from contaminants dumped or emitted by power plants, factories, and agricultural mega - farms. We in the Great Lakes should lead in this endeavor. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: I. Ritchings Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4943 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am concerned that the coal industry and others, get away with too much regarding contamination from power plant wastewaters. I believe the EPA should finalize strong rules and strict stan dards to protect our waters (and lives) from the toxic wastewater pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: name illegible Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number : EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4945 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: No power plant pollution in the water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Priskorn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4946 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Revie w External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 741 Comment Excerpt: I want the EPA to get off their ass and do what the name of your organization says "protect" our world for our children and grandchildren by passing and enforcing stricter laws on all poll uters. Make industry clean up their waste. Remember, you folks work for us! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. K. Worrell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4947 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I was pleased to read that the EPA is taking steps to pass strong rules in regard to waste f rom power plants. Our water is precious to all of us, and must be protected for our use, and that of those who will follow us. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Sherry (surname illegible) C ommenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4948 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's time! You have had the resources to draw on to make sure our water is clean. There is no excuse for pollution in this day and age. Please crack down on dumping. Things need to improve, not stay stagnant. Please work hard for us. I want to see clean water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: name illegible Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4949 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 742 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review E xternal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would like to see strong standards on water regulations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. C. LeFever Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4950 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I fully support Clean Water Action to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. We must remember future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Auuan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4951 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: EPA

– We need clean water to live and be safe for our family . Please allow this to happen. Stop Pollution! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Steve (surname illegible) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 4955 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 743 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Set strong standard on water pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excer pt Number 1. Commenter Name: name illegible Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4956 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No C omment Excerpt: Update the EPA Standards and keep our water safe. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Barbara M. (surname illegible) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4957 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is time to change

– we need to protect our water supply especially from the power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Morgan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4959 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 744 I make the EPA to institute the user of best available technology to reduce water pollution. As a healthcare worker, I directly see the impacts on our population. C omment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: name illegible Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4960 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please look into further regulation of power plants due to water pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Comme nter Name: name illegible Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4961 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: P lease protect our rivers and streams from pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Michael (no surname provided) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4963 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I clearly and whole hardedly urge the EPA to set a strong standard limiting power plant water pollut ion.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 745 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: name illegible Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4964 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Revie w Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need rules to protect our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: The Kurz Commenter Affilia tion: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4966 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please help to protect our waters especially those surrounding our power plants. Our dogs, people, and plants need your attention. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Barton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Nu mber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4967 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please pass strong legislation to limit waste water dumped into the water we depend on! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 746 Commenter Name: C. M. DuBois Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4968 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag : No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The United States needs the EPA to set a strong standard limiting water pollution from all power plants within our states and territories. This is for the protection of future generations as well as our own. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Shoemaker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4969 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please promulgate, and enforce stricter laws and regulations to continue cleaning up or rivers & streams. Comment Response: See r esponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: name illegible Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4970 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ex ternal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support the EPA's enacting a strong pollution limiting policy for all power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 747 Commenter Name: R. Sc ott Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4971 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to request that you take more interest in keeping our water supply safe. Water is the one thing that al! living things need to survive. !t is what makes up more than 70% of our own bodies. It is also part of our lives. We use it for or drinking, for watering our lawn s and gardens, for recreation, and for many uses that we don't necessarily see but which are critical to our lives. Large quantities of water are used to generate power and to cool electricity - generating equipment. Water is used for irrigation, aquaculture , and for many industrial processes and commercial uses. It is imperative that we all take a stronger stance on what people and corporations do with our joint water supply. We live in a time where so many possibilities are upon us, we NEED to USE them! Whe n will be the right time? When we become a society that will have no choice other than to purchase bottles of water that have had to go through too many cleaning processes in order to be considered "safe" - or will it be when we are only able to see crystal clear lakes in photographs along with pictures of the creatures that used to live and thrive in those formerly blue waters? I implore you now to take action. I believe it is time for everyone to stand up and hold ourselves and other accountable for the da mage we have done and continue to do to the only place we have to call home. Thank you for your time. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Olds Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docum ent Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4972 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams a nd Great Lakes from toxic wastewater created from power plants. In the meantime, more progress needs to be made to address the wastewater pollution and a better way to reduce or eliminate it. One way would be to raise the guidelines on how muchEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 748 pollution i s allowed. It is very important to raise the standards in place now in order to protect our Great Lakes and all the Rivers in our great state of Michigan. Let's keep our water pure so we can live up to the name " Pure Michigan" and not have us labeled as " Pure Polluted Michigan". Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Anonymous Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4974 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Having just read a fact sheet on toxins and pollutants released into our waters daily, I was shocked and appalled. The river rouge plant discharge o f 356 million gallons of wastewater daily is not only disgusting, but to me its criminal negligence. Not only by the RR. plant, but also by those who oversee and are supposed to protect the well - being of our State and our water. I'm sure many of you ratio nalize and tell yourself you must "accommodate" some in certain areas so you can stay in office and serve the "grater good" in other areas. If thats the case, I don't want you to be in office. I have children and grandchildren who clean, cook, bathe, and d rink this water daily. To me, no amount of wealth, prestige, job security, etc., is worth jeopardizing their health. Gentlemen, I ask you, is it worth it to you? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Maclachlan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4975 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I'm fairly certain every organism on the planet wants to be cancer and pollution free. Please make the reductions of pollution a priority. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 749 Commenter Name: M. Zarbeck Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4976 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I stress the need for the EPA to work closer with energy companies and like businesses to increase the standards for cleaning up their waste. This is so important for generations to come. Let's make our region a role model to the rest of the nation and beyond. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. W. Atwater Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4977 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Re view Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In connection with the Rulemaking for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Limitations Guidelines, I strongly urge the EPA to finalize a forceful rule to protect all our water sources - rivers, streams, water tables, the Great Lakes or other bodies of water - from toxic power plant wastewater. As 65 percent of the human body, water is essential to people. It is imperative that we protect our water sources by reducing as much water pollution as pos sible. We educate our children about choices and consequences - for example, is it important enough to potentially harm the water table by dumping fertilizer, chemicals, and potentially harmful pollutants on our grass in order to have lovely turf to play on? (One look at my lawn and you'll know which way our family came down on that question.) When the answers to such questions are beyond our immediate control, we seek to act as good stewards by voicing our opinions to those who do hold the decision - making po wer. In this case, the EPA has the ability to require power plants to use the best available technology to minimize water pollution, including but not limited to halting power plants from dumping heavy metals and other pollutants into our surface waters. S tricter standards are needed to ensure the future for your children and mine.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 750 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Calahese Weir Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Num ber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4978 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly feel the EPA should finalize a rule to protect all bodies of water, lakes, ri vers, and streams, etc., from toxic power plant wastewater. We live in a time where people are trying to live healthier lives, everyday. The very source, a vital source, of our lives and our health is water. I can’t understand why anyone personally or corp orately, would not do everything in their power to protect our water sources. Like from the famous movie “The Lion King”, it’s a circle of life. Everything is connected and all future generations deserve to have a fighting chance. We must do our best to pr otect our children’s futures. I’m tired of hearing about people having cancer left and right. Environmental factors are definitely part of the big picture. So, I implore you to consider doing the right thing. Let’s think about the greater good instead of o ur individual greed. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Spade Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4980 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We all need clean water. Water pollution has to be stopped. I swim and fish in these local waters, so a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and stream from toxic power plant wastewater seems like a great idea to me. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. S. Abel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - H Q - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4981 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 751 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please update the rules for wastewater discharge from power plants to reflect the technology availa ble to the power plants and our wish for stringent protection of our streams and rivers. I would appreciate your careful supervision of present and potential pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Staunton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4983 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have two young children at home and I am certainly concerned with the growing talk of power plant pollution in our waters. There is so many things we have to worry about with our children growing up and I hate now to think I have to worry about drinking water and the fish we eat. fish is healthy and I love that my children enjoy eating it but now with the concerns of mercury levels high really concerns me. Please think of the people and our environment and do the right thing! Comment Response: See respo nse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Palmer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4984 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Re view Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: There is proof not only in America, but around the world that pollution is one of the most negative side effects of the carelessness that we face in today’s society. While the issue can be solved with a small matter of time, as it grows, the more negative side effects we will face. Pollution harms animals, plants, our water supply and most importantly, the human race. PowerEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 752 plants hold carcinogens, lead, mercury and other harmful chemicals and elements that we are constantly warned to stay away from. If the standards and all power plants are put into effect, the health of our water supply will increase dramatically. I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from to xic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Clayton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4987 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number : 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge the EPA to finalize extremely strong rules to protect all of our waterways from toxic power plant wastewater and whatever else t hat may threaten them. I am the mother of 3 grown children and have 3 grandchildren, we all love the water, whether it be swimming, boating, fishing, skiing or just relaxing at a park, at one of the many fine ones we have to choose from. It would be an abs olute tragedy for that to disappear! Due to a completely full lack of responsibility on the part of our State Government! You have the power to change this. So just do it! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. N. Toohey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4988 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This problem has gone on for far too long and it's high time we deal with the situation in an urgent and efficient manner. Clean water is important to everyone and every living thing on this planet, and to allow these power plants to continue to pollute our water with reckless abandon and not having to be held accountable for their actions is absolutely disgraceful. We urgently need our legislators to put in place strong federal regulations as soon as possible to make the coal industry act in a responsib le and ethical manner with regards to our water supply. Not doing this could jeopardize the future for generations of Americans and this we will not stand for.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 753 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Na me: J. Zwier Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4989 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge you to do what's right on behalf of American citizens and the environment, and please require power plants to install the latest technology to capture smog - causing emissions to bring them in line with the Clean Air Act requirements . Pollutants from technological ly outdated power plants cause harm to human health and the environment, one example being the DTE Monroe plant in Michigan. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Bover Commenter Affiliation : Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4990 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I cannot imagine if the water were to become poll uted with toxins from power plant waste water. There are enough things to worry about that are out of our control. Why wouldn’t we want to control this? Please, I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect all of Michigan’s rivers, streams, and Grea t Lakes from toxic water. After all, this is Pure Michigan. Let’s keep it that way. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Street Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4991 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 754 Comment Excerpt: As a concerned citizen and consumer, I insist the EPA take aggressive action to clean up and protect our rivers, streams, and Great Lakes. It is imperative that legislation and enforcement to stop dumping will contribute to our long term fiscal health and personal health. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exc erpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Robinson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4992 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Co mment Excerpt: As a concerned citizen, I strongly urge you to work to pass stringent rules and/or regulations to protect our Great Lakes from harmful toxins and minerals going into these waters . I understand that power plants emit a great deal of these toxic materials. Others, such as big business industrialists also emit harmful chemicals into the water system . They merely pay the fines and move on -- likely passing any increased business costs on to the unsuspecting customer. This must stop! Please wor k together to implement strong measures to protect our Great Lakes waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. S. Richardson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Nu mber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4993 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly encourage the EPA to finalize strict guidelines to protect our water, the rivers, streams, and most importantly our Great lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Since the majority of our major industries are required by law to maintain safe levels of toxicity in their waste by - products, including their recycled water, the rule s should most definitely apply to an industry which produces the most deadly forms of pollution..Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 755 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Alexander Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docu ment Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4995 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I encourage the EPA to protect our water sources including the Great Lak es from the toxic byproducts that power plants release into the water supply. We are in the 21st century and the technology is available to power plants to reduce the water pollution. The US EPA has acknowledged that the waste water released from coal fire d power plants account for over half of the toxic pollutants dumped in US waters. Power companies such as DTE threaten to pass the cost of new water treatments onto its customer which is a bully tactic and designed to repress the lower income families in t he areas surrounding these plants such as Trenton and Monroe. Protection of the public and our water supplies is their responsibility and our right. As a resident of Michigan and an avid outdoorsman I feel more stringent standards need to be put into place to limit the pollution dumped into our water system by power plants. Pollution of our water systems affects the water, food we eat, and ultimately our health . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter N ame: D. Kenely Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4996 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing this letter in the hopes that the EPA will finalize strong rules to protect inland water sources from toxic wastewater derived from power plant operations. It's in the best interest of everyone (power companies, consumers, taxpayers, etc .) for power comp anies to utilize best practices and technologies to reduce pollution. Everyone taking steps in the same direction get us to our mutual goals much faster.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 756 I am asking for strong standards & rules to be implemented for ALL power companies - no exceptions. Com ment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Cash Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4998 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Exte rnal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams, and Great Lakes from toxic water power plant water. Only 25 percent of the total global water is fresh. Of that, only 13 percent is on the surface. Please help maintain Michigan’s freshwater sources. Protect the Great Lakes!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Isabella Commenter Affiliation : Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 4999 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please enact new legislation to stop that right a way. This is what government should be doing with its time - protecting citizens from corporations who put profit above stewardship of our natural resources. We vote. Corporations do not. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exc erpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. M. Stone Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5000 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 757 Co mment Excerpt: I am a pediatrician interested in reducing environmental exposure to heavy metals . I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our fresh water resources, especially the Great Lakes, from toxic power plant emissions. Michigan needs strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution as do other Great Lakes states and Ontario. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. M. Love Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5001 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Great Lakes are a precious resource, and should be treated as su ch. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the amount of pollutants going into our water. These reckless practices are a threat to our water, public health, and Great Lakes way of life. As the stewards of the Great L akes, Michigan needs strong standards to limit pollution from all power plants. It is important to act now, before serious health and safety consequences arise. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter N ame: J. L. Heim Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5002 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would ver y much like to see the EPA make a stronger effort to protect our air, rivers, streams and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Every year, huge amounts of arsenic, lead, mercury, etc. are dumped into our water ways by these plants and it's very i mportant for our EPA, our front line of regulatory defense, from the documented health hazards imposed by these toxins, to create more stringent rules regulating and reducing dramatically these emissions. This, in my opinion and that of a growing number of researchers and health care professionals, isEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 758 critical to the health and well - being of our state and country's environment as well the health of all its people who are effected directly or indirectly through the food chain, by the growing measureable leve ls of toxicity in fish and well water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Penin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5003 - A1 Comment Excer pt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Finalizing lifesaving EPA air and water pollution protections, including the carbon pollution standard for new power plants as well as begin the process of limiting carbon pollution from existing power plants and to limit pollution discharge into waterways with strong effluent guidelines. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Kent Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5004 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am an avid fisherman, I urge the EPA to finalize strong rules regarding power plants waste water. Energy companies should be mandated to use technology available to limit pollution into our lakes and streams. These energy companies dump millions of pounds of arsenic and mercury into our waters yearly. Stronger standards to limit this pollution will help improve water quality for the fish we eat an all wild life dependent on water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 759 Comm enter Name: L. Tokaski Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5005 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Fina lizing Lifesaving EPAAir and Water Pollution Protections, including the Carbon Pollution Standard for new power plants as well as begin the process of limiting carbon pollution from existing power plants and to limit pollution discharge into waterways with strong Effluent Guidelines. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Aey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5007 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is the greatest component in/of/for our bodies

– Protect us!.. IT Water is the source of nutrient (with the sun) for all our food -- Protect us!.. IT Water provides recreation for all ages -- Protect us!.. IT Enact!! Enforce!! power plant pollution control!! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Meher Commenter Affiliation: Priv ate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5008 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 760 We need our environment to be as clean as possible for o ur children. This has got to change!! Stop polluting our world. Stand up and do what is right!!! help us to help save our world for our children. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Kavana gh Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5010 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA MUST finalize a s trong rule to protect our water sources from toxic power plant waste water and fracking!! Power plants MUST be required to use the BEST available technology to reduce the highest amount of pollution possible! The amounts of toxic agents such as lead, merc ury, and selenium being dumped into fresh water supplies is abhorrent!! My kids, your kids and grandkids have to live with this and it will effect generations! Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of the communi ty and its citizens. The corporate interest pandering must stop. Make your country great again. Have courage! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Grilleb Commenter Affiliation: Private Ci tizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5011 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 761 Commenter Name: G. R. Demason Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5 013 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Isn't it about time to empower the EPA to protect us better, to assure that our air is clean and our water pure? If using more modern methods to clean the waste water of power plants would make it safer, we should do that. I'd be happy to pay a bit more for electricity if I was getting cleaner air and safer water for it. That's just common sense! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. DeCiantis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5014 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing as a concerned citizen, parent and grandparent . It is time for stricter standards on the industries that pollute into our rivers and lakes here in Michigan. It is my understand ing that decades have passed since the policies for industrial water polluters have been updated . Now is the time. The EPA has been proposing standards to limit the amount of toxic metals and chemicals that can be dumped in our water. These standards h ave been discussed for a long time but not put into law. It is time to change that. The water we drink is vital to our health and we must seek immediate changes to ensure a healthy future of our Great Lakes and the great people of our state. Comment Respo nse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Natarajan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5015 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 762 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to protect our environment and especially our valuable water resources. I urge the EPA to 1 . Require power plants to use all the available technology to reduce the pollution caused by power production. 2. Ensure that these plants do not dump toxic materials that pollute the water resources . 3 . Ensure that all power plants to adhere to the same strict standards for release of contaminants. Comment Response: S ee response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Zhang Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5016 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Exte rnal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We live in the Great Lake region, and we are very fortunate to have the beautiful, clean water around us. I think the prevention is the key. Rather than spending millions of dollar try to clean the water afterwards, we should require the power plants to use the best available technology to reduce pollution . So there won't be so much arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium going into the water in the first place. Our generation should do our part to protect the water, so our children can drink clean water, eat fish without any health concerns, and enjoy the beautiful lakes and rivers we love so much. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 763 Commenter Name: R . C. Peyser Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5017 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In a few days I'll be having my 64th birthday. I feel fortunate to have fairly good health, in no small part due to the Clean Water Act and other protections that our government has put into effect during my lifetime. I'm concerned now about the lives and health of the next generations, including my children and their offspring, so Fin taking the time to write to you to ask you to stand up for my family, and all of the citizens of Michigan by finalizing a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from the tox ins from power plant wastewater. The dumping of poisons like arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium into our surface waters not only endangers the fish and fowl that call the water their home, but put at risk the very lives of our fellow citizens, your famil y and mine included. You are in the unique position to be able to help stop this practice and to protect our precious children. All we can do now as citizens is to count on you for this very important protection. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. R. Gosse Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5018 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpor ated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please exert all possible influence to strengthen the CWA and SWDA for the health and well being of all who use water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter N ame: A. Uroser Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5021 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 764 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please keep industries from polluting our waters any further, so our natural water sources can recover. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Hatten Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5022 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I feel like these guys should clean up the waters so that it can be safe for everyone. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Honig Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5024 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA, as a respectable agency, should have the control to protect our water supply for use and recreation without having the waterways pollutant. Comment Respons e: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. B. Hesley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5027 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Re view External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 765 Comment Excerpt: My Father, being a naturalist and ornithologist, taught me that it was our responsibility as citizens of Pennsylvania to make sure that our officials maintain checks and balances for th e well being of all, to make sure that a monopoly or special interest did not prevail, that issues come and go, but the basic premise never changes. We constantly need to review and revise environmental issues with the changing times. He cited Gifford Pinc hot, former Governor of Pennsylvania and instrumental in the development of modern environmentalism. In 1925, Pinchot submitted the Giant Power Survey's final report to the legislature. The legislature acted on the report's findings, and promptly gave the State the necessary regulatory authority to control what Pinchot described as a "gigantic monopoly" (to extend electricity to all), then it would strike a blow for freedom

– "As Pennsylvania and the nation deal with electric power, so shall we and our desc endants be free men, master of our own destiny's and our own souls." But if the deliberative body failed to act, "we shall be helpless servants of the most wide spread, far - reaching and penetrating monopoly ever known. Either we must control electric powe r, or it's masters and owners will control us." Does this history lesson apply to the regulation of technology by using and requiring legislative powers to prevent and monitor power plant wastewater in our world today? It has been said that mankind never l earns from it's mistakes. We should learn from history what is good for all, not to micromanage our lives as private citizens, but to regulate and prevent the defilement of a God given resource. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 22 65, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Timothy J. (surname illegible) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5028 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpo rated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a tax paying non jorsian, I urge EPA to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic power plant waste water. No expense should be spared to use the best technology available to preserve the purity of our fresh water. It is short - sighted and reckless for those plants to continue to dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium into surface waters. Such reckless treatment of our fresh water needs to stop.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 766 The EPA has an obligation and moral duty to limit all power plant water pollution in order to improve the water quality, preserving the health of the water and the wildlife that inhabit it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Gantz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5029 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to d o its job protecting the waterways of this country. It is to bad the big business has control of our water, coal burning, sugar plantations to name a few. Clean water is a resource that must be protected at all cost. The benefit is far reaching, and our c hildren need our help to speak for them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Mauro Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5030 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants shou ld be required to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution It's time to end this reckless practice. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water w e drink and the fish we eat safer.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 767 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Nordell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5031 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is time for us to look forward to a new way for power, free from the poisons being put in our water. My children are 7 and 5 years old . What will the Manasquan River be like as my son learns to sail it? or as my family goes to the beach as I grew up doing on the Jersey Shore? Please tell me we won't regret what we decide to do. I urge you, the EPA to impose strong standards for the power companies to force change. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Walton Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5032 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have just finished reading Toms River: A Story of Science and Salvation by Dan Fagin, a truly appalling story of corporate deception and the toll that untrammeled pollution can take. But we do not have to live in a toxic community to suffer the effects of pollution . Coal - fired power plants are everywhere, contaminating waste water that leaches into our water supplies with high levels of arsen ic, lead, mercury and other pollutants. The amount is on the increase. EPA, please require power plants to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. We need safe water to drink and safe fish to eat. I have two young grandch ildren whose health is dependent on you to do the right thing.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 768 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Grimm Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5033 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please save our beautiful and sacred lakes, rivers, and streams. Keep them free from all pollution to preser ve the water and it's resources for all generations to come. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: name illegible Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 5034 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a mother and long - time resident of Michigan, I urge the EPA to put in place a stringent rule to protect our water from toxic power plant wastewater. Given the nature of available technology, plants should be required to use such technology to minimize the pollution of Michigan waterways. I want my children and grandchildren to be able to enjoy the natural re sources of this wonderful State. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: I. G. Phillips Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5035 - A1 Comment Excer pt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 769 Please do all that you can to protect our waters from toxic power plant wastewater. We don't want poisonous chemicals in our drinking water or in the fish we like to eat. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. G. Faber Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5036 - A1 Comment Exce rpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our economy is troubled, so we have the handy excuse that we cannot afford to do all the cleanup work necessary to properly service ou r environment. The problem with such an approach is that if our rules were strong enough and followed properly little such work would be required. The major energy corporations - the power plants and manufacturing firms, etc., that are the most prominent v iolators - use the excuse that the cost of clean - up would be disastrous to business and that without the business, conditions would be very much worse. That makes no sense. If the EPA put into effect strong regulations designed to avoid that pollution, the re would be no pollution and there would be no cost. I ask - I plead - that you design better rules and demand compliance . It would be to the benefit of us all - the citizens and industry alike. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Chen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5037 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As we know, we are one of the few countries in the world that can drink straight from our tap without boiling it, fight for it, and not be worried to decide which days we get clean water andEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 770 which days we get to eat. If we continue this act we will soon join many of the third world countries where we will have wars over water (i.e . Darfur), boil our water because its too polluted (i.e. China) or priorities water or food as the cost are cutting into our daily lives (i.e. India). We c urrently have a shortage of fish in the world, some countries like Guinea, Cambodia, Peru are going through the most impact through pollution and global warming, and these countries uses fish as a major source for protein as they are still developing count ries. By producing more pollution into the lakes we are making the water less habitable for the fishes and making the fish population decrease further raising the concern about seafood shortage. Thinking for our children and future generations Comment Resp onse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Thomas Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5038 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Re view External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would like to voice strong support for better requirements for clean water. This has become an increasingly important issue with the increase in information/scientific evidence about the effects of environmental pollutants on our rivers, streams, and lakes. Particularly important are the effects of toxic power plants' wastewater, as these are clearly identifiable sources. Although it's difficult to fix everything, requiring power plant s to help protect these natural resources seems to be an important step, with both environmental and health benefits . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Thomas Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5039 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 771 I would like to voice strong support for better requ irements for clean water. This has become an increasingly important issue with the increase in information/ scientific evidence about the effects of environmental pollutants on our rivers, streams, and lakes . Particularly important are the effects of toxi c power plants' wastewater, as these are clearly identifiable sources. Although it's difficult to fix everything, requiring power plants to help protect these natural resources seems to be an important step, with both environmental and health benefits. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Shapo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5040 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I believe that the EPA should finalize a set of strong rules to protect our sources of fresh water (primarily rivers, lakes, and streams) from man - made waste products. While I recognize the value power plants provide to our citizens, I also believe that prudent regulations can serve the public good. In particular, I urge the EPA to promote regulations that require power plants to use best - available technologies to reduce pol lution. It would serve all citizens well if there would be strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution. Improving the health of our fresh water sources will make all of us safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2 265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. and P. Perlman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5041 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into R esponse: No Comment Excerpt: We insist the EPA finalizes strong rules to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 772 This is a no brainer!! Who wants to bath and drink water that contains heavy metals? Who wants their loved ones to bath and drink polluted water? Who wants to eat fish from polluted rivers and lakes? Duh... NO ONE. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. D. Barg Commenter Affiliation: Private Cit izen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5042 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I sincerely urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams, and Great Lakes from toxic power plant waste, and any other form of pollution affecting the ecosystem in the waters surrounding us. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology and all resources available to red uce as much POLLUTION as possible. The surrounding lakes are not just Great Lakes, they are the largest source of natural fresh water...wait for it... IN THE WORLD! Why would we not do anything and everything possible to keep that water clean? The water s erves too many purposes to list what we use it for, but I have a reason why we should keep it clean. Every year, these power plants dump waste like arsenic, lead, and mercury into surface waters. Changing and improving the system that we use to regulate t he standards of water cleanliness? (maybe not a word) NOT THE POINT. Focus here people, we eat, drink, and swim from the Great Lakes water, so lets make sure we can, our kids can, and all generations to follow. DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Belanger Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5043 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ext ernal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams, and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 773 Personally, I think that the fact we hold 20% of the worlds fresh wat er supply should be more than enough incentive to clean up our act and control this major resource much better than the way we are doing it now. I believe Michigan is one of the most prime pieces of real - estate in the entire world do to the fact that no wh ere else does this much fresh water exist in one area. What we do today will affect our children, and their children; it's now time to think for them and not so short term . Thank you for your time. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 08 19 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. A. Moreno Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5044 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Re sponse: No Comment Excerpt: We, the world including the USA are poisoning the only water on this our only planet. What we put in the water today will affect the children of tomorrow and alter the course of our future -- the future of all life on earth. Yo u have the power to protect its purity and determine its fate. Therefore, along with every person, affiliation and coalitions who wish to protect this earth and all supporters, I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize zero - discharge water pol lution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals that can be dumped into our waters from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Klont Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5045 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, str eams, and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Personally, I think that the fact we hold 20% of the worlds fresh water supply should be more than enough incentive to clean up our act and control this major resource much better than the way we are doing it now. I believe Michigan is one of the most prime pieces of real - estate in the entire world do to the fact that no where else does this much fresh water exist in one area. WhatEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 774 we do today will affect our children, and their children ; it's now ti me to think for them and not so short term. Thank you for your time. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. L. Chute and K. A. Fisher Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5046 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing today to urge the EPA to finalize strong rules to protect our rivers, st reams, inland lakes, and the Great Lakes from untreated or partially treated, toxic power plant effluent wastewaters and air emissions. Regulated Power Plants should be required to use best available technological treatment systems to reduce or eliminate p ollution to the air quality, and surface and ground waters of our state and the other 9 states in the Great Lakes Upper Mississippi River Basin. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury, selenium, and other onerous compou nds into our waters and our air. I do not believe that industry takes or uses this best available technology without being prodded to do so. It does cost money, and as a power user rate payer, I am willing and eager to pay to keep our waters as clean as p ossible for now and the future. It is time to end the reckless practices of today and initiate action to insure compliance from all power plant operations. Protection of our water, our public Health, and our Great Lakes is imperative. As a steward of the G reat Lakes, Michigan must take the lead for strong . enforceable standards to limit all power plant effluent pollution - air and water. Stricter standards will improve our health, the health of our rivers and lakes, and will make the water we drink and th e fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Smith Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5047 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Ext ernal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 775 Comment Excerpt: I have lived near water my entire life. While I have enjoyed the amenities that the Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair have offered, I often wonder what is being done to protect these invaluable resources. This is why I strongly urge the EPA to do whatever is in it's power to protect our waterways. We need solid foundations and guidelines to protect our water for us and for future generations. Comment Respon se: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. and R. Soronen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5048 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Exter nal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams, and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants should be required to use the best availab le and proven technology to reduce as much water pollution as possible. Please do what you can to keep this planet healthy for as long as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Eck holm Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5050 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I grew up on Lake St. C lair summer of 1978. My grandfather was the first person to settle on Dickenson Island in the 1920's. I am from a family of boaters, 3 aunts, 2 uncles all owned boats. This was all I knew growing up.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 776 If these out of date laws are not changed, then what k ind of memories will we be leaving for our kids, kids etc.? The Great Lakes only exist in one place in the world. It's our right and our duty to protect these waters. We owe it to ourselves, our kids, man and women kind. The time is now. Everyday that goes by is a day wasted. Let's change the laws, lets change them now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Theemore - Spears Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5051 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I understand that EPA rules to protect water quality in relation to power plant waste water have n ot been recently updated. Given the improvements in available technology and scientific knowledge of the health effects of toxics in the environment, I would like to see stronger standards limiting pollution, particularly from power plants. I think the Ame rican people deserve this, for the sake of our health and economic prosperity, as well as for the environment and the Great Lakes. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Eberbach Commenter A ffiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5052 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our potable fresh water is a precious resource which much of the world would kill for! It is an issue of Worldwide Public Health, international Politics, life and death, and more. Change can start right here in Michigan! As the steward of the Great Lakes, a significant portion of the Earth's fresh potable water, Michigan needs to lead the development of strong standards for limiting pollution which devalues our water resources. The Power Plants are a good place to start, since the present waste disposal rul es need updating and the energy industry is amenable to win - win pioneering regulations for the public benefit as well as their own reputation. Given what we have learned during the past several decades in biotechnology, and the worth of the clean water we still have, we can implement stricter and better conceived standards for protecting that worth. We can do it first here in Michigan, and perhaps following our lead, for the rest of theEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 777 planet, to make fresh water natural resources which we drink, with whic h we irrigate our farms, and in which the fish we eat gather our nutrition...or poison ..SAFER for us all. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Eberbach Commenter Affiliation: Private Citi zen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5053 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our potable fresh water is a precious resource which much of the world would kill for! It is an issue of Worldwide Public Health, international Politics, life and death, and more. Change can start right here in Michigan! As the steward of the Great Lakes, a significant portion of the Earth's fresh potable water, Michig an needs to lead the development of strong standards for limiting pollution which devalues our water resources. The Power Plants are a good place to start, since the present waste disposal rules need updating and the energy industry is amenable to win - win pioneering regulations for the public benefit as well as their own reputation. Given what we have learned during the past several decades in biotechnology, and the worth of the clean water we still have, we can implement stricter and better conceived stand ards for protecting that worth. We can do it first here in Michigan, and perhaps following our lead, for the rest of the planet, to make fresh water natural resources which we drink, with which we irrigate our farms, and in which the fish we eat gather our nutrition...or poison ..SAFER for us all. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Musko Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5054 - A1 Comment E xcerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In the State of Michigan, our greatest asset is our water. It sustains our people, allows for a healthy agricultural economy, and it provides recreational opportunities. This results in economic growth and business opportunities for our citizens. I am extremely concerned about the environmental impact of power plants in our state. Specifically, I feel we need protection from toxic w astewater discharged into our waterways andEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 778 lakes. It is truly a crime to allow these plants to discharge billions of pounds of toxic materials, such as arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium into the Great Lakes. We need a strong, comprehensive rule to prot ect our citizens, as well as the wildlife that do not have a voice in this matter, which will require power plant operators to utilize the most current technology available to eliminate the destruction of our ecosystem. Michigan needs to limit power plant water pollution, and the only way to do it is with higher standards, mandated by the EPA. I urge you to finalize and implement the rule that will accomplish the reduction of pollution by power plants, which will benefit everyone in the state by making our water cleaner and safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Hopkins Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5055 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly support regulations that will result in clean rivers, streams, and lakes so that all of us can have safe drinking water and so that the fish we eat are not contaminated with toxins. While we all benefit from the energy from power plants, we should not sacrifice the environment for the sake of cheap energy. Please ensure that power plants use the best available technology to reduce pollutan ts that enter our waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Smedberg Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5056 - A1 Comment Excerpt Numb er: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Strong rules are needed to protect our regional water from toxic power plant wastewater, and other threats . We have seen what happens to our water when oil leaks, invasive species, and manufacturing pollution are allowed. Our water is a vital resource that will be increasinglyEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 779 sought after in the future . The future of human beings and the plants and animals that sustain us is at stake . You ha ve the opportunity to set the strongest standards known, for the benefit of our citizens now and in the future. Please support those standards as you look to the distant future, not the immediate expedience . Do not give in to lobbying efforts . Comment Re sponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. and P. Riehl Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5057 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge the EPA to finalize stiff rules and even stiffer sanctions to protect our, rivers, lakes, and streams from the wastewater from power plants. My personal e xperience of 34 years in sewage treatment and additional years as a pipefitter at a steel mill compel me to point out that without fear of enforcement no progress can be made. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Milstein Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5058 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 3 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerp t: There currently are no federal regulations to protect our water from toxic chemicals. The EPA has proposed long overdue power plant pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals and other chemicals that can be dumped into our water. Strong s tandards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. I'm requesting that the EPA do its job and protect our environment by requiring power plants to clean up al l its pollution and protect our health and the health of our children now and in the future.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 780 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Milstein Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document C ontrol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5059 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 3 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce and ultimately eliminate their pollution. There currently are no federal regulations to protect our water from toxic chemicals. The EPA has proposed long overdue power plant pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals and other chemicals that can be dumped into our water. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. I'm requesting that the EPA do its job and protect our environment by requiring power plants to clean up all its pollution and protect our health and the health of our children now and in the future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. E. Fuller Commenter A ffiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5060 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would urge the EPA to consinder a rul e that, in its effect, would require water that is used in the process of the generartion of electricity to be, upon discharge, to be as clean as the water was when it was introduced to the plant . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Calderon Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 781 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5061 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respo nse: No Comment Excerpt: I Strongly urge the EPA to finalize and implement laws and policy that prohibit power plants from dumping any kind of waste into our great lakes. We have a responsibility to our children and the rest of the world to protect the w orlds largest fresh water supply. The legacy of our generation's innovation and creation will become a moot point if we can not effectively learn to curve our waste and abuse of our great lakes. As law makers you have the ability to correct the errors of o ur ways. I ask not for me but for the next generation, Please lets not be the society that destroyed the worlds largest water supply. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. M. Tengler Comment er Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5062 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As an owner of two waterfront prope rties in Michigan, one on the Great Lakes water system, in St. Clair Shores, the other in Atrim county, an inland lake that feeds into Lake Michigan, I strongly urge the EPA and any other concerned groups to maintain the fight against anyone who is endange ring the quality of our water here in Michigan . As a 70 yr old, all as a Michigan resident, hunter and fisherman I've seen the degradation of all of our water and wetlands. The combination of the uncontrolled pollution dumping that's been going on forever , to the somewhat recent foreign aquatic life forms being let loose to destroy what's left of our remaining natural wildlife. . . . . . . . . My Grandkids Don't Have a Prayer of EVER Enjoying Michigan Like I Did. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Brodovich Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5063 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 782 External Review Flag: No External Revi ew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our waters from toxic power plant waste water. Not only should the EPA protect our water and air from power plant pollution, but it should reduce demand for power by requiring more energy - efficient appliances and requiring power companies to effectively promote energy conservation among consumers. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Na me: C. Morado Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5064 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Please resist the efforts of the coal industry to block putting strong standards regarding power plant pollution standards into effect. The health of our wa terways and communities is at stake. Power plants must be responsible for clean up of all of their pollution, not just some negotiated portion of it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Markey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5065 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Reducing pollution is extremely important for Michiganders and all Americans. Power plants must be required to use the best available technology to reduce the havoc they have wrought to our natural resources. No more reckless practices for powe rplants - it is time they own upt o whatEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 783 they have done and take measures to rectify it and prevent it from happening in the future. Please do your utmost to protect our water! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Anderson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5067 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our family would like to see stronger standards to coal and other power plants water pollution. We want healthy rivers and streams for the fish that live there and that we eat. Also, we want good yummy drinking water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, E xcerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Hesnan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5069 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Co mment Excerpt: I as an American citizen feel very strongly that the EPA should finalize a rule to protect our rivers and lakes from waste water cause by power piants. There is technology available to help significantly reduce the amount pollution that go es into our water system . Dumping the chemicals into our drinking water is terrible for the families and businesses that use that water supply and action should betaken as soon as possible. The EPA should take action against these plants in order to keep our rivers and lakes sanitary and drinkable for the communities that use them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: V. & B. Ahronheim Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 784 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5070 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have read through the basic summary and some of the associated literature about thi s proposed rule regarding coal power plant discharge guidelines, and I would like to voice my support for it. It is the purpose of industry to aggresively pursue energy production in the most efficient manner -- it is the purpose of regulation to see that t his efficiency does not come at the expense of the general health and well - being of the general public. I have long supported renewable and clean energy through our local opt - in programs, but that doesn't mean that we have no remaining need for coal power. Since we have to keep coal power around, please consider newer guidelines to reflect more current technological and ecological standards . We cannot allow industry to abide by outdated standards simply because it is less troublesome to them. The EPA sets the guidelines that they must follow, so it is critical that the EPA deliver guidelines that are in the public's best interest. As a resident of Michigan, with its rich water - filled ecosystem, I want to make sure that our beautiful rivers and lakes do not continue to deteriorate. I strongly urge the EPA to consider, enact, and enforce the improved standards laid out in this docket. The power companies look out for their own interests -- it is your task to look out for ours. Please do not fail us. Comment Res ponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. M. Posther Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5071 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Extern al Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Great Lakes are too great a treasure to not protect them from toxic pollutants that are presently being released by the power plants that surround the Lakes. Our waterways dese rve better, these five gifts of nature deserve better . The Great Lakes deserve the EPA to finally approve strong rules and regulations that prevent such polluting practices. Please adopt measures that preserve and protect our Great Lakes and the waterways that feed them. Keep them healthy.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 785 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. DeBarr Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5072 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: According to EPA research, "The discharge of coal combustion wastewater from coal - fired power plants has caused a wide range of environmental effects to local aquatic life. Studies have documented numerous ecological impacts from the intentional and accidental release of coal combustion wastewaters, as well as through detailed laboratory and field studies examining the toxicity of the characteristics of coal combustion wastewater.... In addition to a direct impact on aquatic ecology and local wildlife, coal combustion wastewater has also resulted in other environmental impacts such as altering local habitats, contaminating drinking water, and resulting in fish advisories." Source: EPA821 - R - 09 - 008 Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category: Final Detailed Study Report [Section.6.3] It is past time to do something about this. It is time to end this reckless practice and to protect our water, our public health, and our Great Lakes. As the steward of the Great Lakes, Michigan needs strong standards to limit all water pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Williams Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5073 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I think that a bit more protection for our water sources from careless organizations is necessary.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 786 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Duff - Silvermann Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Con trol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5074 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a resident of Michigan and the Great Lakes, one of the world's most important fresh water sources, I strongly and respectfully urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our precious rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It is just good sense that power plants should be required to use the best availab le technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. It is shocking to read that every year these plants are still dumping billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters. We can no longer afford to stick - our - heads - in - the san d and ignore this abuse and threat to the environment (and the threat to the quality of our lives) here in Michigan. It is time to end this senseless and reckless practice. I want my grandchildren to be able to enjoy eating fish from the Great Lakes once a gain, as I did many years ago, before the advent of the power plants and their harmful disrespect of the environment. I want them to be able to safely enjoy our beaches and rivers for sport. l want them to be spared the unnecessary threat of serious illnes s due to water pollution. Strong standards to limit ALL power plant water pollution will improve the health of our rivers and streams. Strong standards to limit ALL power plant water pollution will make the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. We owe this to our children, to ourselves, to the great state of Michigan. EPA, please step up and do the right thing. Finalize a strong rule to protect our water, to protect us all. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Maness Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5076 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: After reviewing sections seven and eight of the Technical Development Document listed as a supporting document (EPA - 821 - R - 13 - 002), it is clear that new technologies exist that not onlyEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 787 effectively treat numerous sources of pollution that the EPA had pre viously considered "low volume wastes" - FGD wastewater, FGMC wastewater, gasification wastewater, and leachate - but also do so in a cost effective manner, as demonstrated by section nine of the TDD previously mentioned. Given the additional incentives to i ndustry offered in section 8.1.2.10 to remain in compliance with these new regulations - by virtue of providing them the extra time they claim to need in order to become compliant - I see little evidence of any particular vindictiveness toward industry and i ts goals. Indeed, many different types of plants exist; gauging how these incentives would perform on any particular plant in terms of cost and time is difficult. However, given the conclusions of the Benefits and Costs Analysis supporting document (EPA - 82 1 - R - 13 - 004), I believe that on the whole these regulations represent a sufficient balance between the needs of industry and the scientific realities of the negative impacts - cancer, neurological damage, ecological damage these pollutants have on our popu lation. No regulation is without cost to industry, but the cost to society on the whole for not instituting these regulations will continue to creep up on us as time passes, given the nature of these pollutants that ensures they will remain a hazard for de cades on end. I suspect that these costs could rise well above the maximum $954 million dollars the EPA claims would be required for industry to be in compliance. I cannot in good conscience suggest that we leave future generations to foot the bill for our actions, especially in light of the available technologies (and their relative costs) that control these pollutants that we previously had no manner of controlling. Given the extensive benefits documented by the Benefits and Cost Analysis and in light of the total cost of compliance range the EPA provides - as high as $954 million but as low as $185 million - the Maness family offers its support of the most stringent rule changes the EPA believes necessary. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. A. Dragotti Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5077 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I demand EPA to finalize a strong rule or law to protect our rivers, lakes and streams and bays from toxic power plant waste water. Power plants should be required to use the best technology to reduce the most pollution . Get the arsenic, lead, mercury, selenium and raw waste out of our waterways. I am tired of buying water to drink and i want to eat the fish I catch.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 788 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. M. Peras Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5078 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: EPA should support higher standards toward protecting our waterways from power plant operational hazards such as waste waters. Increased standards will improve the pollutant count released and help preserve our way of life. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Weller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5080 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This letter is an appeal to protect our waterways from toxic powerplant waste. It is time to improve technology to prevent the dumping of arsenic, mercury and lead into water we use for drinking, cooking and bathing. I urge you to set stronger standards to protect our rivers and streams and make the water we drink and the fish we eat safe for us and future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. McVa y Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5081 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 789 I want the EPA to crack do wn on the pollution from coal - fired power plants such as the Xcel plant nearby on Valmont Road in Boulder, which has polluted not only my city's air to threaten asthmatics, but also polluted the surrounding soils and water with mercury at unacceptably tox ic levels. I want EPA to insist that these utilities use best available environmental technology, not with slow phase - ins over years, but sooner rather than later. Most large utilities are simply trying to make extra money by loading our surrounding commu nities with unacceptable external costs, whereby our communities pay the health costs and suffer the poor health these utilities could have prevented. I want the EPA to insist upon no more externalities. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Kuhta Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5082 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to bring a strong ruling to protect our waterways and bodies of water from the poisons spewed by power plants. The Hudson River is a classic example of how water can be, first, destroyed by careless industry practices, and then restored to potable, swimmable condition. We cannot allow the kind of careless treatment of our resources that occurred in the 18th Century to happen again now, when we know better. Toxins such as lead, mercury, arsenic and selenium mus t be prevented from being leached (or even dumped) into surface waters by power plants. It's time to bring about permanent standards to which industry should be held, making the water in which we play, from which we drink and fish, and in which we wash, sa fer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Richmond Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5083 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review F lag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 790 Comment Excerpt: Power plants, coal mining plants etc should be required to use the best available technology to reduce the amount of pollution they put out. Every year, these plants dump BI LLI ONS of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium into surface waters. WHY IS THIS ALLOWED? Strong standards to limit ALL power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. We need to keep our water supply as clean as we can...our lives depend on it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. and C. Timko Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5084 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our health and that of the next generation depends on what we do today. Unive rsal access to clean water, free of toxins from the tap, should be our priority. America has the technology, money, and means to insure the safety of its peoples. Power plants should be required to implement the best available technology in order to reduce pollutants. Industries must devote efforts to preventing pollution at its source, and the government must fulfill its role by enacting and enforcing specific legislation to protect its citizens. Please support the above referenced legislation, which will make this possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. DeCiantis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5085 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 E xternal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 791 It is time for stricter standards on the industries that pollute into our rivers and lakes here in Michigan . Now is the time to take action and manda te stronger policies. Millions of gallons of wastewater from coal fueled industries such as local area power plants are increasing the levels of toxins in the Great Lakes. I don't ever recall as a young child having our local beaches closed due to pollutio n levels of our waters. This is becoming a more common practice and while I appreciate the warnings, that is simply a band - aid . The root cause has been identified and we need to take action . The EPA has been proposing standards to limit the amount of tox ic metals and chemicals that can be dumped in our water. These standards have been discussed for a long time but not put into action . It is time to change that. The water we drink is vital to our health and our families health . We must seek immediate cha nges to ensure a healthy future of our Great Lakes and the great people of our state. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Stetina Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control N umber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5088 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA must create strong rules to protect the water in the state of Michigan from to xic substances emitted by power plants. Water pollution can be curbed by requiring power plants to use the most advanced technology to control the the flow of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into our water supply. Failure to do so will endanger the pub lic's health. This practice should be curtailed immediately. The implementation of strict water standards for the energy industry is needed to improve the water quality of our lakes and streams and make the water we drink free of toxicity. Comment Response : See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. C. Gatto Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5089 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 792 Comment Excerpt: I am writing with our deepest concerns over the constant pollution of toxic waste water into our natural water resource supply . The power plants responsible for dumping billions of Arsenic, lead and mercury into our waters must be held accountable for doing so. We urge the EPA to finalize a ruling to protect our waterways from this toxic dumping. These toxins are responsible for many health issues on the rise in our child ren ( ex. Autism, childhood cancers, and lower IQ's) Please enforce stronger regulations so that we may reduce the rise in these diseases and ensure our future generations a safer water supply . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 22 65, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Gembarski Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5090 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respons e: No Comment Excerpt: I feel that the EPA needs to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from the toxic power plant wastewater. With all the advancements in pollution technology. I don' t want my family and many other families health's to be affected by a major companies bottom line. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Brazaitis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5091 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am concerned that the EPA has not finalized their rule to protect our nation's waters from t he wastewater of our local power plant. As a citizen who lives on the bay, I believe power plants should use the best technology available to cut the amount of pollution that reaches our water ways.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 793 Please do all that you can to improve the water that we u se for food and pleasure . Our future generations will thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Parariello Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5092 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please protect our lakes, streams, and rivers against toxic power plant waste. There should be requirem ents for power plants to reduce the pollution dumped into our waters. I urge the EPA to protect our waters with higher standards that limit all power plant pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Comme nter Name: T. Allen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5094 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize strong regulations to protect our lakes, rivers, and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. The current regulations concerning power plant wastewater are inadequate and outdated. Power plants should be required to use the best avai lable technology to reduce the dangerous amounts of pollution being released every day. These plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury, selenium, and other dangerous chemicals into surface waters every year. The short term, and more import antly long term, impact these chemicals will have on our environment could be staggering, and may even exceed our expectations. All too often substances once thought of as "harmless" are later proven to be extremely dangerous: DDTs and CFCs for example. Th ese chemicals being released into our water are not even obscure, maybe - not - so dangerous substances. They are deadly poisons commonly known to have drastic effects on the health of individuals as well as the environment as a whole. Dumping such chemicals into public water systems is no less than reckless abuse of legal loopholes on a massive scale. We cannot afford to wait any longer for a solution. Immediate action must be taken by the EPA toEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 794 help pass the bill Docket ID: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 in order to reduce further damage to the environment which your organization is charged with protecting. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution are necessary to improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. The future cannot protect itself. That is the duty of the present. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Pepitone Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5095 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic p ower plant wastewater. These are highly toxic and known to be carcinogens. It is time to end this practice. It has also been found that by adopting more green practices not only do you decrease harmful emissions but it ends up cutting costs and saving mone y for the company in the long run. Not only are the general public affected by this but the children and you are also being harmed. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Anderson Commenter A ffiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5098 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge you to adopt the strongest possi ble rule against power plants emitting toxic pollutants into our rivers, lakes, and streams. The state of Michigan, where I live, is particularly afflicted by power plant pollution. Because we are situated along the Great Lakes,Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 795 the greatest source of f

resh water in the entire world, it is all the more important to ensure that this precious resource not be destroyed by pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Caffrey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5099 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We implore the EPA to protect our wate r! Toxic svastesvater from powerplants has no place in our rivers, lakes and streams. . . Please require power plants to use the latest technology to reduce pollutzon to the lowest level possible. Harmful chemicals are being dumped into surface waters in a larming amounts. PLEASE help us end this egregious practice!! Impose strong standards limiting water pollution from ALL plants to restore the health of our rivers and streams -- insure the safety of our drinking water!! Comment Response: See response to D CN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Kaufinan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5101 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review I ncorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is critical that the EPA finalize its efforts to protect the natural environment, especially our lakes and streams, from toxic power plant wastewater. The technology exists to help cut down on the water p ollution created by power plants and should be employed to do this. Strong standards must be in place to limit the industrial practices that send billions of pounds of arsenic, mercury, lead, and selenium into surface waters. These heavy metals not only ki ll fish, but affect the ecology around them. The health of the planet isEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 796 critical to the health of the people who live on it, and when the rivers and streams are polluted, we are all endangered. Do not miss this opportunity to do the right thing and to beg in to counteract all the contamination that has already affected our environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Wagner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number : EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5103 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants are the biggest industrial water polluters, yet the standards to protect our d rinking water sources and our rivers, lakes, streams and bays from their toxic discharges have not been updated since 1982. Wastewater from coal - fired power plants is especially nasty. It contains high levels of arsenic, lead, mercury and other pollutants. These toxins are known to cause cancer, lower children's IQ and cause other health problems. Over 23, 000 miles of streams and rivers are already contaminated with power plant wastewater. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency predicts that without stri ct limits, power plant toxic discharges will increase by 28% over the next 15 years. The EPA has proposed long overdue Clean Water Act standards to limit the amount of toxic metals and other chemicals that can be dumped in our water. Unfortunately the coal industry is already trying to block them. Tell EPA to require power plants to clean up all of their pollution, not just some of it! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Simica Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5105 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 79 7 Comment Excerpt: I amongst many others find it of vital importance of the EPA to enforce more stringent rules and regulations regarding the handling and disposal of waste water and pollution currently being disposed in creeks streams and rivers. It is to the point that all recreational activities such as swimm ing, fishing, children playing, hunting crawdads and cooling off in the summer has now become to dangerous to allow. God put water on this miracle of a planet for a few reasons and poisioning it was simply not what our devine creator had in mind. Its bad enough that power plants contribute the most toxins, heavy metals. Frack water is not very far behind and when all culmunate together, We are leaving a toxic mess for an up and coming generation that they may not be able to handle. With the rising cos ts of health care, It should be taxed in the same manner but higher than the taxes on cigarettes. Because your neglect and lack of concern contribute to the rise in illnesses such as cancer and do its fair part in the death of innocent people. Comment Resp onse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Weiss Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5107 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Rev iew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am joining Clean Water Action in their advocacy for requiring power plants to clean up all of their pollution, not just some of it. America's clean drinking water has served to reduce sickness and improve the health of our citizens. In instances where the EPA has relaxed its standards, serious illness and death has resulted. Please ensure that our rivers and streams are free from arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium and other chemicals a nd toxins. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 798 Commenter Name: C. Creath Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5108 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Revi ew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I request that the EPA creates and institutes a strong rule that will protect our valuable water resources from toxic power plant wastewater. It is essential to o ur community, our race, and the planet that power plants utilize the most up - to date technology to reduce water pollution. Our future generations depend on this. Stop allowing arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium to be dumped into surface waters! Limit ALL power plant water pollution to improve the health of rivers and streams. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. H . Foster Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5111 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am concerned about the future of our planet. I have watched the world change in many ways whi ch, if not controlled, will change the world substantially for my children and grandchildren, not to mention future generations. We must do what we can NOW to stem these changes. Therefore, I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, la kes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It is imperative that such standards be set and that they be enforced . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: F. Lurz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5112 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 799 Comment Excerpt: I urge strongly EPA to do all in its power to curb t he dumping of toxic, coal - fired power plant waste water into America's rivers and streams. EPA knows this wastewater contains arsenic, lead, mercury, selenium, cadmium, and other toxic chenucals in concentrations that are killing off our wildlife and causi ng cancer, birth defects, vascular disease and neurological damage in humans. As an American citizen and taxpayer I urge EPA in the strongest terms to do the job it is paid to do - protect the environment! Raise and enforce strong standards to prevent powe r plants from poisoning our citizens, our water and our wildlife! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Bachelder Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5114 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please act on behalf of our state and the people of our state, and pass legislation that will protect the State of Michigan and the Great Lakes from all polluters. Protect the water levels, and the cleanliness of our waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Pilotti Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5115 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As an active outdoorsman and concerne d Pennsylvania citizen, I urge the EPA to implement stronger standards to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. M. Va ris Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 800 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5116 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This letter is to advoca te to the EPA to settle for the strong ruling to protect our environment - our rivers, lakes, streams and ponds from toxic power plant wastewater. It protects us as humans as well as the eco - life that is needed for our planet to survive. My late father Geo rge A. Varis was a Senior Engineer for Ensearch (Ebasco) in Manhattan, NY, now TXU (Texas). He designed nuclear power plants and also did consulting work for Shoream at Indian Point, Long Island, NY, as well as Con Edison in NYC. He also worked at Hauk in CT. My father, always said that Nuclear Power Plants in the United States took years of careful designing and precautions. They could not fail, unlike the foreign counterparts, such as Russia which leaked. American - made nuclear power plants have the abilit y to use the latest technology. Then, there were economic downsizing decisions and changes made by companies . The companies transferred the American educated engineers to other states to force retirement or leave. These actions were taken in order to brin g in newly arrived foreign educated engineers for low cost salaries. They had to be trained by American engineers but did not study in our schools or understand the process over the years. If my father were alive today, with the care and excellence that he brought to his work, he would strongly urge, as I am now, for companies to use the best available technology to reduce as much water pollution as possible . He believed and always took interest in the upcoming technology, as I am interested. Quality in de sign, safety, technology and excellence in process is part of American work ethic. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Pilotti Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Numb er: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5117 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA needs much stronger standards for power plant water pollution in order to protect our waterways and ensure human safety. Currently coal plants are allowed to dump an unlimited amount of arsenic and other lethal poisons into our waterways. Existing standards that apply to coal plant wastewater were established over three decades ago and do not cover most of the worst pollutants. Zero liquidEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 801 discharge technology and converting to safer coal ash handling systems could eliminate discharges of the most contaminated wastewaters entirely. Only by enacting the toughest standards proposed will E PA fulfill its duty to protect people and our environment. As a young adult and college student, I spend a lot of recreational time outdoors and on our waterways and I have since I was a child. I sincerely hope that the EPA will enforce much more stringent standards to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater so that they will always be able to be enjoyed by future generations . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Sarkady Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5118 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am concerned about our natural resources and the lack of protection we have from the careless way in which power plants dispose of toxic waste water. The EPA needs to implement stricter standards to protect our rivers, lakes and streams. Every year, these plants dump b illions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into surface waters . It's time to end this reckless practice. Why are there no federal regulations to protect our water? What gives these power plants the right to dump any of their waste water into our waterways? Why aren't they held accountable for the damage and health of us all? These power plants need to clean up the damage they've already caused .What will be left for our children and their children? In this age of technology and awareness of a n environment struggling to maintain a healthy balance, one would think a safe way to dispose of toxic waste water or better yet, implement a system that wouldn't create it, would be in place. The best technology available should be in place to reduce poll ution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Osborn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5119 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 802 I am a high school student that is concerned about the cleanliness of our drinking water, the recreation areas around rivers, streams and the Great Lakes, and the he alth of current Michigan residents . I am writing this to urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. I believe that it is time to end this reckless practice to protect our wearer , our public health and the Great Lakes way of life. I hope the EPA agrees! Please protect our water sources and health. Michigan is surrounded by the Great Lakes and needs strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution. Comment Response: See r esponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Kavulia Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5120 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I appeal to the EPA to finalize and adopt strong rules to protect our waterways from the numerous toxic products produced in the nation's coal - fired power plants. Cheap electricity and highe r corporate profits do not trump the health and well - being of the current and future citizens of this country. I was shocked to learn that wastewater containing heavy metals from the scrubbing process is routinely dumped directly into rivers, the same rive rs that supply drinking water for cities and towns all across the country. This is a reckless, unhealthy and potentially lethal practice that must be stopped and the technology exists to stop it. All power plant operators must be required to install the be st available technology to eliminate these toxins from our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Kubiski Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 5121 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 803 Comment Excerpt: I was born on the shores of Lake Superior, and I have lived most of my 60 - years close to Lakes Superior, M ichigan, or Ontario. I learned to swim in one of Minnesota's 10,000 lakes before I could walk. The fresh water systems of the United States are some of our most beautiful, economically productive, and culturally significant treasures. We cannot afford to l ose them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. A. Smith Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5122 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Rev iew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have lived all over the country and through the years have been saddened to return to previous locations and see what pollution and toxins have done to our bod ies of water. Also as a clergy person I an always reminded of our duty to preserve and protect all of creation. The waterways are an important part of that creation. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commen ter Name: R. Recker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5123 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I stron gly urge the government to apply some "new" rules to these plants, in order to maintain our right to a pollution free environment for my children... and YOUR children . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Com menter Name: L. Garcia Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5125 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 804 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to protect our most valuable resource. Pumping toxic chemicals into the ground will have a negative effect on the environment. This type of technology is putting families health at risk of multiple contaminates. We need strong standards to lim it all power plant water pollutants from entering ground water, rivers, lakes and drinking water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Mitchell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docum ent Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5128 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water is very important to our environment. Although heavy metals i n very small quantities are a natural part of the environment levels of heavy metals in water that are dangerous for life - both plant and animal, need to be monitored. The EPA needs to have standards for heavy metals in water supplies that make the water safe for the environment. Coal is an important source of energy for electricity production in the early 21st century and while we need this important fuel it is incumbent upon the EPA to set limits for heavy metals being dumped into the water supply. If th e EPA officials and the power company decision makers together are willing to drink the water downstream of the power plants and are willing to allow their families to drink this same water, then I am in agreement with the mutually agreed levels. I am a re tired chemistry teacher. I believe that a 0 level of emissions is unrealistic and unnecessary but I do believe that technology should be employed using scrubbing operations to reduce the amount of emissions, both to the water and to the air. In as much as EPA regulations are outdated they should be updated to match new technological advances in clean energy production. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Doyle Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5129 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 805 Comment Excerpt: Technological advances have been made to minimize th e amount of waste generated and released by power plants. Please consider revising minimum levels of toxic waste such that best practices are followed using the most advanced technological available. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 08 19 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Doyle Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5130 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respon se: No Comment Excerpt: Please make sure that the EPA is enforcing laws that protect people from pollution that is dumped by power plants into rivers and lakes. These pollutants can be very toxic and damaging to aquatic invertebrates and fish. They can a lso hurt humans who eat these animals or swim in the water or drink the water. There are technologies that make sure that this kind of pollution does not get released by the power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exc erpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Burke Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5131 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comme nt Excerpt: I am writing to express my concern regarding coal - fired plants which contribute to more than 50% of toxic pollution in our lakes, rivers and streams. Stronger standards that limit the amount of toxic heavy metals that can be discharged into s urface water need to be set and mandated. On a personal note, as a mother of three young children, it makes me sick to think that our drinking water may not be safe. My six year old son loves wildlife ...especially frogs and turtles. We are constantly hang ing out around ponds, streams and lakes and to think that these creatures that he loves may be in harm is unthinkable.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 806 The solution to this problem is greater than stopping just this issue; however we must begin somewherel Whoever is listening out there .. .please listen to your intuition and conscience. You know what it is saying and you can't afford to ignore it! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Cunningham Commenter Affiliation: Privat e Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5132 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have decided to write and ask that you update wastewater guidelines to limit the amount of toxic metal that can be discharged into our water. Ideally there would be no discharge at all but we need badly to protect out drinking water and as the majority of drinking water in Colorado is from surface water this i s vitally important. As coal - fired plants are among the largest polluters of our water please update and place strict limits on wastewater discharge. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Jacobs Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5133 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Current waste water d ischarge guidelines need to be updated limiting the snout of toxic heavy metals. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. J. Silverman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control N umber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5134 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 807 Comment Excerpt: It is self - evident that steam electric power plants should be required to use the best available techniques for limiting the quantity and toxicity of their effluent. When these facilities are permitted to use outdated practices, they operate at artificially low cost by shirking the burden of handling their effluent. That stricter guidelines may increase the retail cost of electricity is irrelevant: the cost to remedy the damage done to affected waterways is incalculable. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Bascetta Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5135 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please take action to protect our lakes, rivers and streams. Current wastewater discharge guidelines are outdated. We need updates in place to prevent companies from continuing to dump wastewater without proper care. The majority of Colorado's drinking water comes from surface water. Compa nies should be required to use the best available technology to prevent pollution in order to reduce the risk of exposing our earth, wildlife and community to toxic heavy metals. Our natural water sources should remain clean and not be polluted just so the y can greedily claim a larger profit. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Wibbler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5136 - A1 Comment Exce rpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please update the standards to stop the disposal of toxic chemicals into our waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 808 Commenter Name: M. Drumwright Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5137 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpora ted into Response: No Comment Excerpt: While not claiming to be an expert, I am aware that the EPA has not updated our standards and laws regarding power plant emissions for a really long time. In spite of the fact that technology has vastly improved sin ce 1982, little has been done to require coal - fired power plants to reduce or eliminate pollutants including mercury, arsenic and selenium from the plants' wastewater . The toxic wastewater eventually makes its way into our surface waters, endangering food , wildlife, fish and PEOPLE! Now would be a good time to use the P in EPA: PROTECT! Please get busy and update the wastewater cleanliness standards for all industrial sites, especially at power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: V. A. Frazer - Abel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5138 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have been an avid watersports enthusiast since my youth including sailing, canoeing and paddle boarding. Please put in place standards that limit all power plant pollution in order to improve our waterways and making our water safer to drink. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: June Thomas Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5139 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 809 Comment Excerpt: Please adopt the highest standards possible regarding coal ash waste - water disposal from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Szubielski Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5141 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incor porated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This letter is writing is being addressed to the EPA to further legislation in our country (and globally) to protect our water sources to include rivers, lakes, streams, and the Great Lakes from any harm to wild life, fish, fowl ecosystems. The power plants need to address water pollution and the dumping of toxic chemicals so our pollution is minimalized to save our precious wildlife. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. J. Graczyk Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5142 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize very strong and stringent rules regarding power plant water emissions. The newest best technology should be required to prevent or remove the multiple toxic substances released into our waterways in the Great Lakes Basin. We have the most valuable asset of the future in our water reserve. One which will make our state a destination for future development. Our future, our health and the health of our food sources depends on strong rules now.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 810 Comment Response: See response t o DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Lange Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5143 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review I ncorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please finalize a stronger rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. H. Re hlaender Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5144 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need power but not at the expense of polluting our rivers and streams. In other words, power plants should be required to use modern technology to protect our water quality as much as possible. That's why we need the EPA to instigate strong standards that will limit all power plant pollution and keep our drinking water safe and protect the fish that live in 4he streams and rivers. We are counting you. And so are future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Comment er Name: F. D. Maldonado Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5146 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 811 I am requesting the EPA to rule to protect our water. Keep pollution out of our water sources and help protect our health by using valid technology and resources. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter N ame: K. J. Baxter Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5147 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Protectin g the rivers, bays, oceans and streams, the EPA backing this rule against the toxic power plant wastewater with today's technologies to do such, the toxins should be dealt with accordingly to assure pure water outcome as needed set forth by stronger limits and standards. I recommend changes as soon as possible. Clean up pollutants from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Olivo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document C ontrol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5148 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As the mother of three growing children, I think it’s time for the EPA to fina lize a strong rule to protect our waterways from toxic wastewater from power plants. We should expect no less than the best available technology to reduce as much water pollution as possible. It makes me sick to think about the billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium. These plants dump into surface waters each year. This practice must stop! Please work hard to keep my children safe and make our waters cleaner than ever. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265 , Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 812 Commenter Name: J. Bosma Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5149 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please help make water safe for everyone. Enforce and create a law for all water against wastewater pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Sullivan Commenter Aff

iliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5150 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I very much so support the clean water ac tion. I’ve changed my diet to protect my health and body; due to the fact water and food is not to be trusted. Please continue to fight against water pollution and clean energy, especially to save on electric bills, which have gotten higher and higher ever y month. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Godec Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5151 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please update and improve your clean water standards so that Xed Sugy's Valmont Plant stops polluting our rivers. My children and I need clean water to drink, not to xic heavy metals.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 813 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Ray Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5152 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Yes

– I’m behind EPA to clean all our water ways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Depm an Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5153 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please update the standar ds to stop the disposal of toxic chemicals into our waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Depman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 5153 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize very strong and stringent rules regarding power plant water emissions. The newest best technology should be required to prevent or remove the multiple toxic substances released into our waterways in the Great Lakes Basin.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 814 We have the most valuable asset of the future in our water reserve. One which will make our state a destination for futur e development. Our future, our health and the health of our food sources depends on strong rules now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Depman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Doc ument Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5153 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 3 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Reduce contamination of food and water to protect out communities, plea se! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Gagne Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5155 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Everyone deserves clean drinking water and I urge the EPA to ensure that there are stricter regulations put in place. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. (surname illegible) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5156 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorp orated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 815 Please STOP dumping anything toxic into the environment. There is only so much and while we have the capability of destroying the ecosystem, dumping isn’t necessary. There are other ways. Don’t give up on our ing enuity. You can stop the dumping. Please find another way. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Cox Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 515 7 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would urge a rule or a law to protect our lakes and rivers. If the problems don’t stop all of our rivers and water ways will be ruined. Pollution is bad enough with the help of dumping waste without any consequences. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Annymous Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docu ment Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5158 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We definitely don't want coal plants polluting our water sources. Toxic heavy metals should not be discharged into our water. I believe individuals can be responsible for filtering their own water. I don't believe we need to have enforcement from outside technological sources. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Johnson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5160 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 816 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: At 62, I am concerned for the welfare of younger generations. It is impartive now that we set standards for power plants to use best practices to keep our water, in all forms safe now and for the future. Long after I am gone I hope future generations won't have to worry about their water because you acted now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Cambias Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Co ntrol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5161 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am a strong supporter of setting limits to toxic waste from power plants. The water in our rivers and streams should be as clean and healthy as possible. I urge the EPA to create strong maximum levels for wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Cambias Comm enter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5162 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We should do all we can to prote ct our creeks, streams, lakes, and rivers. Strong standards need to be in place to limit all power plants from polluting our most important resource

– water. Pollutants such as arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium

– to say nothing of nuclear waste

– need t o be limited as much as technology allows. I strongly urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our waters from toxic wastes of power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 817 Commenter Name: E. Hu gman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5163 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It’s simple!!! Courage Discipline Integrity Wisdom Compassion Please stop killing us just because it’s easier, more cost - efficient and monetarily beneficial than taking care of our shared environment. What the price of live? Please do your job. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Laser Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5164 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review In corporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please protect our waterways from heavy metals. We need a strong standard for the amount of power plant pollution they are allowed to dump into our water sources. We need them to use the best available techno logy to deal with their waste. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Badger Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5165 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 818 Comment Excerpt Numb er: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Local waterway protection is important to our family and we urge action to protect them! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Wilson and R. Solveo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5166 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Ex ternal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA needs to lay down some rules! Our waterways should be treated with dignity and respect so that the fishes are living and people have good, clean water. Power plants are killing the water sources and they should be reducing their BIG FAT WASTE. Every year, they dump billions of gallons of As, Pb, Hg, and Se into surface waters. It's time to cease this audacious system. Limit ALL POWER PLANT POLLUTION! Comment Response: S ee response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Liotta Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5167 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ext ernal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please take the necessary measures to protect our community’s fresh water supply. The technology is certainly there to facilitate this request!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 819 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Clydesdale Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5168 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I believe we are in need of a strong rule to protect our rivers and lakes from toxic power plant waste water. I urge the EPA to finalize such a rule. It is critical that we make the water we drink and the fish we eat s afe. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution is a must! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Lypich Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - H Q - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5169 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing the EPA to ask that you put in place rigid rules to protect our environment from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants should be required to use state - of - the - art technology to reduce water pollution. Stop letting them dump toxic materials in our waterways. Strong rules on limiting all power plant pollution will help ensure our water is safe to drink, and our fish are healthy and fit for consumption. Please help to ensure our water is clean for future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Berghoff - Jasloaski Co mmenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 820 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5170 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Without clean water, the earth will die. I would like to urge the EPA to make more stringent regulations regarding the dumping of toxins into our water system. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Solano and T. Mencher Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5171 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We strongly urge the EPA to make a strong and highly enforced rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic chemicals from power plant wastewater. There is absolutely no reason arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium should go into any water source. For this reason, power pl ants should use the best technology possible to significantly reduce these elements in our surface/ground water. No person on earth would like to drink nor consume fish from toxic water. It's time to make our earthly water safe for future generations. Comm ent Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Hazra and S. Hazra Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5172 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We are writing to bring an important matter to the attention of the EPA. It is important to finalize a strong rule to protect our surface water, rivers, lakes and st reams from toxic wastes released from power plants. They must be required to use the best availableEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 821 technology to reduce this pollution as much as feasible. Standards based on the Clean Water Act must be used here. Every year these plants release billions of pounds of toxic materials such as arsenic, lead, and mercury into our surface waters. Strong standards must be put in place to limit all power plant water pollution. That will improve the quality of water in our rivers and streams and make it safer to d rink the water and eat the fish caught in these waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Koster Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 517 4 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is my strong desire that the EPA do everything it can to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic power p lant wastewater and other by - products. Without regulation, the power plants are dumping astounding amounts of life threatening pollutants into our waterways and allowing seepage into our water table. Please curtail these devastating practices through stric ter regulations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. D. Cannitor Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5175 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Ex ternal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I add my name to those urging the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect the future of our children by passing the strictest rules possible to protec t rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Without potable water, we cannot survive this planet. Please don't let short term considerations destroy our collective future!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 822 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Masterson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5177 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: N o Comment Excerpt: The rivers and streams and all of the bodies of water are part of what makes New Jersey beautiful. One would think that the EPA, that is the Environmental Protection Agency would be working very hard on keeping these waters clean. Turn s out, they aren't. Every year, toxic power plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium into these waters. It is a matter of urgency that the EPA put some type of rule into effect limiting all power plant water pollution. It sounds to me that the EPA is being bought by these companies. I can't think of any other reason why they would continue to let people drink toxic water and catch toxic fish! It's nothing more than common sense. This is a financial issue. It's too expensive for these plants to get rid of their waste properly, so they pay off the EPA to dump it in the water. Someone needs to stop and investigate everyone involved. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Na me: K. M. Ryan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5178 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I do not urg e, I require the EPA address a strong rule to protect our river, streams and especially our Great Lakes for all toxic power plant waste water. Concerning any an all amounts of arsenic, lead, and mercury not to be in the surface of our water, but also remai ns and is digested into our food, whether fish as an over our land as an over our land as sediment that remains for years.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 823 The fish, the farms are all affected. it is your duty to make sure all of our water is safe. Maybe not for me but the future. Those t hat are on the EPA should not be a part of the EPA if they do not make this an issue for the future of all. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Schrader Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5179 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rive rs, streams, and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. I enjoy swimming in Lake Michigan with my family and hope to continue to do so with clean water. We often go to the Van Buren State Park which is right next door to the Palisades nuclear power plant. This concerns me. Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce as much water pollution as possible. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium into surface waters. It’s time to end this reckless practice to protect our water, our public health, and our Great Lakes way of life. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Rogers Commenter Affiliation: Private Cit izen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5180 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am a Travis Co. resident who appreciates the EPA for looking out for our water use and intake. But, I would more so greatly appreciate it if there were no limits on toxic metals or any chemicals dumped in our water. I would prefer that there were “NONE.” Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 226 5, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 824 Commenter Name: A. Dominguez Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5181 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response : No Comment Excerpt: Update the power plant regulation. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Manleena Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 5182 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean up the water ways. Water is really important and we really need to keep it clean. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Slocombe Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5184 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Revie w External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I'd love to see EPA finalize a strong rule to protect our waters from toxic power plant waste water. These plants should be required to use modern technology to reduce pollution, thus maki ng safer our drinking water, and the fish we eat. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 825 Commenter Name: A. McFarland - Provins Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 5185 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Protecting Texas rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic power plant waste is imperative. I strongly urge the EPA to finalize rules, implement strong standards and limits, requiring all power plants to make use of the best available technology available to minimize pollution. Arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium does not belong in our water. Comment Response: See resp onse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Kleeman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5186 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly encourage the EPA to enact rules to regulate the power plant industries to develop clean practices for wastewater disposal. Please encourage these companies to engage in sustainable enviro nmentally responsible practices, and prevent contamination of my and future generations ground water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Mayor Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docu ment Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5187 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our country needs completely clean and healthy water to keep our country strong.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 826 Please keep standards strong and strict to limit all power plant pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Foley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Numb er: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5188 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support the strongest possible protections for our water systems. Power plants must be regulated to the strictest standards and limit their wastewater as much as technology allows. We must put the environment above businesses profit margins. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Glover and D. C. Wlliams Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5189 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I have been living in Austin, Texas proud to call Central Texas home since 1976. I love this area and want it to be clean and safe for many future generations of my family and other families. Please vote for clean water action!! Comment Response: See resp onse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Gannon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5190 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External R eview Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 827 The EPA needs to make stringent laws to protect our waterways from toxic wastewater. Power plants need to be strongly regulated in regards to the amount of severe pollution that is dumped into our waters. Increasing the standard with which we monitor and limit power plant water pollution is a necessity which improves the quality of the water we use and the aquatic organisms we consume. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. W. Kurt Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5191 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge the EPA to finalize a strong ruling and Federal Law to protect all our lakes, rivers, and streams from toxic power plants producing millions and millions of gallons of wastewater. As a career Water Treatment Plant operat or, I see daily the bad effects of illegal dumping, wastewater pollution, and the general effects of having dated environmental laws across the country. Since you have no problem telling my family to eat healthy and exercise to keep healthy and active body ’s, you should also be pushing to keep body of our country healthy. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Moran Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 5192 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our waterways from toxic power plant wastewat er. Utilities and power plants should be required by federal mandate to use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution as possible.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 828 The time has come to end the reckless processes employed by these utilities of dumping by products such as arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into the surface waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Lapp Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 5193 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wast e water. This is extremely important to me especially for the safety and health of my 3 young children. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Robinson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5194 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to request the EPA to create a strong rule to protect our waters. This includes lakes and streams, from the waste water that is created from toxic power plants. The amount of pollution that is produced by power plants should be reduced by the best available technology. It is past time that these plants should be stopped from dumping harmful substance into our waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Meyer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5195 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 829 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need the power plants to make an effort into keeping our water and air cleaner. What would the future be like i f we don't work on the dumping problems now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Hovat Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5196 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: When considering the power plant pollution standards, please think ahead to future generations - to our children. It is known tha t the toxins which are being dumped into our waterways are carciogens. We should all "suck - it up" and pay the price to use the best technology available to reduce the amount of pollution. Power plants bear a lot of this burden. I understand cost of energy may increase and I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Hendricksen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5197 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would like to express my concern over toxic power plants wastewate r and its effect on our rivers, lakes, and streams. Power plants need to reduce the amount of pollution they allow into our water sources. The best was to enforce that all of these plants are using the latest and best technology in the process.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 830 We need to set up strong standards to reduce this pollution and restore our drinking water to a purer form. Also we need to make sure these standards are adhered to so that the fish we eat is not laden with arsenic, mercury, and lead from power plant refuse. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: I. Muler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5198 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Considering that coal - fired power plants contribute more than 50 percent of toxic pollution to our lakes and rivers, they must be held to a higher standard - they must make sue of th e best available technological advances to limit the toxins in their plant's discharge. I don't want my health and that of my family endangered because plants like Valmont don't want to invest time and energy into cleaning up their operations. They are re sidents of Boulder, and that kind of pollution would never be tolerated from any other resident, would it? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Wenske Commenter Affiliation: Private Citize n Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5199 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need regulation! Don’t pollute our water. We need to keep this world clean for future generations. We drinking water, not poison. You’re killing the environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 831 Commenter Name: J. Mullins Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5200 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I pray that the EPA can enforce rules to protect our rivers, streams , and lakes from waste water released from corporations that make a profit and taint the drinking water. This water is also used in agricultural which grows and produces fruits and vegetables that we and our children consume. If there is a technology that could prevent harming the water we use, power plants must use all resources to protect our water, land and air. We need to sustain life as we know it. Please hear the future in our plea, the world's future depends on it. Let the children of our future. Lo ok back and be proud. I only hope the people of the future look back and feel obligated to do the right thing. Lets have strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution. This will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drin k and the fish we eat safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Boland Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5201 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to encourage the EPA to solidify the protection of our local waterways from toxic power plant wastewater. As a mother of 4 bo ys. I am highly concerned about the release of harmful toxins into the water I use on a daily basis to cook, wash and bathe my family in. Pollution reduction should be the most prominent issue for these power plants at the present time. Polluting our water needs to be stopped! I am encouraging the enforcement of limiting ALL power plant water pollution so that me and my children will have clean water to drink, play in, wash with, and feel confident that their own children will have a healthier future! Comme nt Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 832 Commenter Name: J. Solon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5203 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Exter nal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The average life span in BC was 20 - 25. It has risen to 85+, my point being the average life span increases over time. If we keep polluting and dumping toxic waste in our drinking water, average life span is going to decrease. We have advanced since cavemen time. We have the technology to fix this problem. We need to do something about this polluting problem and continue to increase the average life span. It’s time to advance techno logy even more and make a better and cleaner environment four our children and grandchildren. It’s time to stop the madness and clean up our messes, mistakes and make them the best decision we ever made. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. P. Delicco Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5204 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated in to Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please take the right course and stop letting power plants pollute our waters. I have a 14 year old son and it's a shame that there are waterways here in ocean county that he can't swim in, or fish, or go crabbing. Why? b ecause their dirty and toxic from dumping. Let's make it clean and safe for our children and their children.. It starts here with us! Stop polluting now, stop the coal fire power - plants, no one wants to drink arsenic. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Davis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5205 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 833 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorp orated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support keeping our worlds water as clean as possible. I believe everyone should do their part to protect this vital resource. All power plants, industries and privately owned businesses should have strict guid elines to follow in regard to processing all waste. All should be monitored closely and provided with assistance, needed to meet set compliances. They should also be strictly penalized when they fail. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Sobiesiak Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5208 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We are a family of five with three small growing children. We use our inland lakes more than most. We try and visit our beautiful Great Lakes yearly. We worry daily about the water we are using. I know I am not alone. The m others in my community share the same views, our children's health and safety. We hope the EPA will finalize a strong rule to protect our water from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numb er 1. Commenter Name: D. Chabrul Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5209 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I implore EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. This action is needed to insure the health of rivers and streams to make the water we drink and the fish we eat safer.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 834 Comment Re sponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Shelffo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5210 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I've been involved with the application and implementation of environmental control systems at energy conversion plants from the mid 1970's. Since the 1982 Act, billions of kilo's of power plant waste containing mercury, lead, and arsenic, have been discharged in U.S. waterways alone. Please finalize the strongest rule possible to protect our water systems now and for future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - O W - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Cartell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5211 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA should strongly consider laws to protect and preserve our waterways from contamination. No dumping laws should be in place. Following that all chemicals should be disposed of responsibly but not down the drain. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Nonigan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5214 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: N o External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 835 Comment Excerpt: It is not excusable for anyone to knowingly pollute our lakes, rivers and streams. The knowledge we have today concerning the fragile state of our plant is proof enough to practice zero tolerance to any active polluters. I am concerned to know that the EPA has listed Boulder Creek as polluted due to high levels of selenium. The guidelines and standards for active power plants are outdated and need to be revised to accommodat e our dire need to save our valuable water resources. Everyone needs to do their part to clean up our environment. We must practice on a daily basis to become good stewards to our delicate environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Kostas Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5215 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Res ponse: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams, from toxic power plant pollution. This should not be a discussable issue. The strongest regulations must be passed immediately for our safety, and the health of the environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Miller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5216 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our waterways are in jeopardy! The EPA needs to crack down on power companies and enforce strict rules. These rules need to force companie s to use any means necessary to reduce harmful waste from entering our rivers, lakes, and streams.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 836 This reckless, bare minimum tactic to increase profit is at the cost of our, and wildlife's waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Cartwright Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5217 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Rev iew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am sure the EPA will finalize a strong rule to continue to protect our rivers, lake and streams from toxic power plant waste water. I wish there was a more concentrated effort to educa te the public as to the effects of pollution on our ecology

– our way of life. If this was done more of the public would realize that pollution control begins in our homes and businesses as well as power plants

– after all we need power plants to maintain our engines, don’t we? Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Woodard Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5218 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please continue to develop higher standards for power plants that dump toxics into surface waters. I support the EPA finalizing a rule to protect our waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. McMillian Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 837 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5220 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Rev iew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I hope this issue (will) be solved soon. I thought it had. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Morales Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5221 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants, esp ecially need to stop adding toxics to our water. Sooner or later our water supply may end. People die a lot without water. why kill people with water that's not safe to drink that's simply murder. Our water needs to be clean at any cost! Please keep people in your hearts and in your mind, to have better clean water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Millen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 08 19 - 5223 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We expect our EPA to do as much as possible to protect our waters from further pollution. We want a clean water supply for future generations of people as well as other living things! We must act now to prevent the continued dumping of these toxic pollutants into the waters of our planet!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 838 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numb er 1. Commenter Name: C. Babin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5224 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I do believe that power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce water pollution and selenium into surface waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name : C. Stokes Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5225 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would strongl y like to have the EPA have stronger mandates over the reduction of toxic water by products that are emitted from existing power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Edler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5226 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I sincerely urge EPA to finalize a st rong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. It is time to take a strong stand against all power plants.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 839 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Schae ch Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5227 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please make the strongest standard for the amount of heavy metals power plants dump into our drinking water sources. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Hall Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Contro l Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5228 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please do everything you can to clean up all of the pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Chenoweth Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5230 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I'm concerned about the future generations water, which is being polluted without attempt to stop. Well guess what? It needs too!! Power plants HAVE to use the most advanced technology in preventing pollution. It has to stop!! It is getting worse and worse!!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 840 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Brown Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5231 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is our biggest concern as Texans, in my opinion. Having clean water for our children and children 's children is essential, so we need to pass rules to protect our lakes, rivers and streams from pollutants such as that which is generated by power plant wastewater. Power plants should not be allowed to dump billions of pounds of toxins into our waters e ach year. Likewise, other industries which pollute should also be more tightly regulated. We must do something NOW to keep our environment safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Caplan Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5232 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Enforce stronger standards to limit all power plant water pollution. This will improve the health of lakes, rivers, and streams, leading to improvements in us, because the water we drink will also be safer and healthier. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 226 5, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Edgar Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5233 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 841 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants have been allowed to pollute our water and it has to stop! What are they thinking? Do not let them poison the next generation what little water we have. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excer pt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Reed Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5234 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please finalize a strong rule to protect our streams, rivers and lakes from toxic wastewater. Power plants are making lots of profits. They should be required to use the latest technology to reduce pollution. Comment Response: See response to D CN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Parras Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5235 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Inc orporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Urging EPA to review and implement effective rules to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Brink Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5236 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 842 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our lakes, streams from toxic power plant waste water. People should not have to worry about arsenic, lead, and mercury in our drinking water

– it is 2013. Get it together and protect us!! This should alre ady been taken care of not even a concern. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Thomson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5237 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The damage already done to our rivers and streams is too vast to even comprehend. So the ultimate question is

– what will you do to ensure the situation doesn't get worse? You have the power to enact legislation that will require power plants to use the best technology available, in an effort to prevent further pollution of our drinking water. I urge you to do so for my sake and you rs. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Demarest Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5239 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Fl ag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am embarrassed that a country as strong, powerful and influential as ours continues to pollute our rivers, streams, and oceans in order to keep energy costs less exp ensive for power plants and their stakeholders. These power plants continue to dump billions of pounds of deadly by -Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 843 products (lead, arsenic, mercury, and selenium) into nearby waters that are deliberately chosen for this purpose. If citizens were to pollut e the aquifer system in their towns and cities they would certainly be subject to legal and economic sanctions, yet our government continues to allow this practice to continue for business interests. We speak loudly against terrorist influences while permi tting economic terrorists to prosper in our own backyard. If the EPA is a responsible body of government, it would provide stronger standards, stricter requirements and more rigorous consequences to protect our surface waters. Comment Response: See respon se to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: O. Sholeye Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5240 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Re view Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I'm writing this to say that you should build a strong rule that protects clean water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. D. Marion Jr. Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5242 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a grandfather of 3 wi th one on the way in October of 2013. I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. Please do this for my grandchildren. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265 , Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Felnman Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 844 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5243 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please make a strong ruling which would protect our rivers, lakes, and stream, from toxic power plant wastewater. We definitely need the safest water possible. New Jersey has already seen the effects of contaminants in the ground and water. It is time to stop this reckless practice. Legislate strong standards to limit ALL power plant water pollution! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Kovalak Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5244 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please consider making stronger rules to keep our ri vers, lakes, and streams clean. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Briggs Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5245 - A1 Comment Excerpt Num ber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: You are the government agency charged with creating policies and enforcing them to protect the health of people and our environment. Please f inalize a strong rule to protect our water in our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic plant wastewater. It is not too late. DO IT NOW!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 845 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Kirkland Comment er Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5246 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to protect our water resources rom toxic power plant wastewater. We need limits which prevent power plant pollution from increasing. the cost to ignore this responsibility to our future generations must be greater, and enforced, than the cost to research and implement less - po lluting power plant practices. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. A. Pollauf Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5247 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As studies have indicated, coal - fired power plants are one of the largest polluters around our country. It is important to me and my famil y that our rivers & streams be free from toxic pollutants according to the best of current standards. My hope is that the EPA will take serious its mission to protect the waters of our beautiful state. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Anspach Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5248 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 846 Comment Excerpt: Please do everything you can to keep our water clean. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Degelia Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control N umber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5249 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Please step up and help. Think about the future we cannot continue on this path. We have a new baby and we are extremely worried about the future. Do the right thing. It's not hard. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Degelia Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5249 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpora ted into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Please step up and help. Think about the future we cannot continue on this path. We have a new bab y and we are extremely worried about the future. Do the right thing. It's not hard. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: name illegible Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5250 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 847 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please consider keeping coal plant water pollution under strict guidelines! This is not a safe practice when coal fired power plants are responsible for 50% to toxic pollution in lakes, rivers, and streams. Please update your guidelines! Drinking water comes from surface H20. Heavy metals are contaminating us! Protect us! Create strong st andards for wastewater D/C! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Hollingsworth Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5254 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I'm urging the EPA to please, please finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, streams from toxic power plant wastewater! Pleas e require power plants to use technology to reduce these toxic chemicals polluting the precious resources and this planet that my 10 month old son will grow up in! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commente r Name: L. Hollingsworth Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5254 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please take the right course and stop letting power plants pollute our waters. I have a 14 year old son and it's a shame that there are waterways here in ocean county that he can't swim in, or fish, or go crabbing. Why? because their dirty and toxic from d umping.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 848 Let's make it clean and safe for our children and their children.. It starts here with us! Stop polluting now, stop the coal fire power - plants, no one wants to drink arsenic. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Cryer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5255 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Ex cerpt: Please see to it that our waters stay clean in our rivers, lakes and streams. All plants should be regulated and monitored. If you doubt the cleanliness of the water, bring your kids and grandkids swimming in some mercury water, see if you think i t's safe and clean! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Cabello Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5256 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Ext ernal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Clean energy is important! Other cities that are way smaller and less technologically advanced can have clean energy sources, so can we. Please consider requiring power plants to use this technology to reduce pollution, especially from heavy metals. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Lewis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5257 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 849 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpo rated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I believe that the EPA should regulate emissions from coal burning power plants. The energy it produced is essential, but the pollution is not. Please require power plants to use the best available technology to r educe water pollution as much as possible. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Rener (no surname provided) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 5258 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It's been a hard enough struggle to maintain our waterways without additional pollutants being added to the mix. It is unacceptable for the standards to be lax in providing highest controls on power plants, the largest contributors. Our surface water must be maintained to the best qualitative state possible for the safety of all citizens. Comment Response: See resp onse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Brightwell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5259 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Extern al Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please do your job and protect our water and environment. I am tired of the escalating toxins in our food, water, and environment. I am tired of being poisoned. Please do your job and stop the po isoning.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 850 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Smith Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5260 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I highly encourage you to implement the most protective options available in protecting our water sources. On April 15 th , the EPA submitted a proposed rule fo r new protections, and I want to see the toughest standards. If we don't protect our resources now, future generations will resent us. Please help protect our waters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Comm enter Name: T. Cecot - Scherer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5261 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge for the sake of generations to come, vastly stronger rules to be put in place by the EPA to protect our water from toxic power plant wastewater. It is time to hold the corporations who profit from these power plants to account for their reckless dumping of arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium into our surface waters. The technology to curb this practice exists; make them use it! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Morgan (no surname provided) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5262 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 851 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA n eeds to let go of the 30 year ban. They should be responsible for their actions. I work with elderly, and I feel that there needs to be a serious change. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Giglio Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5263 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers; lakes and streams from power plant wastewater that contains toxins. I worry tremendously about our future; I worry about the impact these toxins will have on me and future generations. With so many family membe rs and friends of mine battling various cancers, I’m afraid that without tough legislation, disease will only run rampant. Do your part to limit all power plant water pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numbe r 1. Commenter Name: M. L. Riveria Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5264 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Ex cerpt: I believe it is important to stop pollution our surface water for future generations, and for our families of today.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 852 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Beauchamp Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5265 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our environment is our most valuable a sset, and we, the citizens of the United States, rely on the EPA to be guardians of that asset. I urge the EPA to take strong action limiting all power plant water pollution. Harmful levels of toxic waste dumped into our waterways adversely affects our env ironment, food supplies, and public health. No one regrets having an environment that is “too clean,” but we all regret when it is too polluted. Please do your part in being stewards of the Earth. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. B. Sayraf Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5266 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Resp onse: No Comment Excerpt: Our environment is our most valuable asset, and we, the citizens of this country, rely on the EPA to be guardians of that asset. I urge the EPA to take strong action limiting the toxic wastewater from power plants. Harmful level s of toxic materials dumped into our waterways adversely affect our environment, our food supplies, and our public health. No one regrets having an environment that’s “too clean,” but we all regret when it is too polluted. Please do your part in being a steward of the earth Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 853 Commenter Name: H. M. Sherman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5267 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants should be required t o use the best available technology to reduce the most amount of pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium into surface waters. It’s time to end this reckless practice. Comment Response: See respon se to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Thompson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5268 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External R eview Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With the advances in technology, it is past time for the EPA to make tougher rules that do a better job of protecting our water supply from toxic waste generated by power plants. The laws should requi re power plants to use the best available technology to reduce the amount of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium they dump into surface waters . This not only protects the aquatic environments, but also the citizens who eat local fish and drink local water . Is it not the responsibility of the EPA to protect the environment? The technology exists to drastically reduce the pollution without causing undue hardship on the power plants. I urge the EPA to set and enforce regulations that strongly limit all power plant pollution. The Great Lakes are a valuable natural resource, and worth the costs involved in protecting them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Burke Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5270 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 854 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I demand the EPA to Finalize. Comment Response: See respo nse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. A. Sage Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5271 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a life - long resident of the State of Michigan, I am very concerned about the release of toxic chemicals into our Great Lakes. I'm asking the EPA to exact and enforce strong rules that limit and co ntrol the amount and content of wastewater that power plants are permitted to dump into our waterways. The Great Lakes are a treasure that we must protect. We drink this water. We eat fish from these waters. Our vacations are spent on or near these waters. Please do all you can to ensure the next generations will have these beautiful lakes to enjoy. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. L. Taylor Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docum ent Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5272 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and str eams from toxic power plant waste water. I know we all want to keep our beautiful Michigan lakes clean and pure.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 855 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Brown Commenter Affiliation: Private C itizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5273 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water is in everyone's best interest. It is imperative that the EPA finalize a strong rule to protect our fresh water resources, from toxic power plant wastewater. It is less expensive for these companies to pay a fine for dumping, than it is for them to dispose of the waste properly. Stronger regulation would be a huge motivator to end that wreckless behavior! Clean water isn't just important for local citizens, it's important for every living thing. It is in your power to impose stronger standards, to limit all power plant water pollution and improve fresh - w ater quality. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Mogleo Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5276 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External R eview Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, streams from toxic power plant emissions and wastewater. Comment Response: See res ponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Weiss Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5277 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 856 External Review Flag: No External Review External R eview Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. Power plants must be required to use the best available technology to reduce as mu ch pollution as possible. If they do not do so, they should be fined, with penalties set high enough such that it is in their interests to adopt the latest and safest technologies. Even better than a penalty system would be the establishment of an automati c tax on all power plants to cover the costs of clean up. Once plants comply with new regulations, they can petition to be exempted from such taxes. Once could argue the plants will pass along all such costs to the consumer. If that is the step they choose to take, so be it. It will be bad PR for them. Clean water is a resource for all. It is a public good and access to clean water is a cornerstone of any functioning civilization. Please support the implementation of strong standards to limit all power plan t water pollution so we may witness the improvement in the health of our rivers and streams and continue to ensure the water we drink and the fish we eat are safer from contaminants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Eickbauer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5278 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: A strong rule should be finalized to protect our rivers, streams and Great Lakes from power plant toxic waste. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. A. Green Commenter Aff

iliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5279 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 857 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We have the perfect example of why we nee d stronger laws to protect our rivers, streams and ground water. The land around the Visteon Plant is pollutant and the Ford Motor Co. is responsible. They have agreed to some responsibility. However this has been going on for more than 10 years. The clean up has not started and the polluted ground water is moving closer to the local subdivision and surrounding waterways. Please do something for us. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. B. Hoo ker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5281 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Great Lakes are the beauty of Michigan. The Detroit River provides drinking water to so many people. I urge you to help preserve and protect Michigan rivers, streams, and Lakes from toxic power plant waste water by finalizing a strong rule. Please do t he right thing. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Randolph Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5283 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Extern al Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams, and especially Great lakes from toxic power plant waste water. It's a shame that plant s aren't already required to use best available technology to reduce this toxic pollution. The difference between the best guidelines and the worst is billon's of gallons ofEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 858 pollution, and mindboggling amounts of heavy metals. The fact that this has gone u n - remedied for over 30 years just adds to the long list of reasons this urgent problem demands a meaningful solution. We've waited 3 decades

– let's make this update count. Please, on behalf of the people of Michigan, guard our Great Lakes. Strong standard s are the only way to protect our greatest natural resources, fresh water, and the fish we catch and eat. For Michiganders, the Great Lakes area a resource, a point of pride and a way of life. We beg you to take this step,, and protect those things for all of us. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: I. A. Sanah Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5284 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Revie w Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We will be judged by that we leave to our children. We will be judged by all the generations that look back upon us. We owe it to them to strive for a future where they can look back and smile. We owe it to them to safeguard the waters of this earth. Please pass a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams, and Great Lakes from toxic wastewater from power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Pamachin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5285 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I'm writing to urge the EPA to finalize strong rules to keep our water clean. Power plants should be required to use the best methods and technologies to reduce the amount of toxins (arsenic, lead, mercury, selenium, etc.) they introduce into the environment specifically our water systems. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 859 Commenter Name: L. Paglin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2 009 - 0819 - 5286 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In an effort to protect our families in Michigan, I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. I want my daughter to eat fish that is safe when they are carrying my future grandchildren. As stewards of the Great lakes, we need strong standards here in Michigan to limit all power plant wa ter pollution. These stricter standards will improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. This is a gift we need to protect with passion. “Pure Michigan” means our water too! Comment Response: See respons e to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Concord Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5287 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Rev iew Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly support the docket and request that the EPA hold toxic power plants responsible for the damage they do to our waters. They should be required to uphold safety precautions to reduce pollution and dumping clean water shouldn't be a priviledge. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Drickamer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5288 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 860 As a 45 year resident of the Great Lakes region and a strong supporter of the Huran River Wate rshed Council, I believe it is virtually important that the EPA implement a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. The reckless dumping of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium must cease. Please help us to c reate safe and healthy water for all. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. N. Wilson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5289 - A1 Comment Ex cerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize strong rules to protect our wonderful Michigan waters from toxic power plant wastewater. Stringent forced reg ulations are needed to save our Michigan water. Toxic wastewater, toxic air, toxic drinking water and make for an environmental disaster about to happen in the near future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Honeycombe Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5290 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt : As an RN for almost 40 years, I have a great interest and concern for public health. I believe it is important for the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our water and Great Lakes from power plant toxic water waste. I love Michigan and their Great Lakes and I believe it is our responsibility to protect them from power plant pollution. I would like to feel that we are safe in the water we drink and the fish we eat. It is time to protect our water and our health from power plant pollution.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 861 Comme nt Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Guerra Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5291 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Exte rnal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams, and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. I have lived in a lake community for most of my life a nd have seen the closing of beaches due to the high level of PCB's in the water. Clean water is something everyone should support regardless of where you live. For the safety and health of everybody, I urge you to require stronger restrictions on power pla nt wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. McFrier Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5292 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It has come to my attention that the Clean Water Act has not been updated since 1982. Since the early 1980's, many changes have occurred surrounding new meth ods, chemicals and toxins that are dumped into our waterways and will have lasting impacts on our streams, rivers, and lakes. I beg the EPA to pass a strong rule to better protect our waterways and the precious Great Lakes from toxic power plant waste. Pow er plants, while providing tremendous benefits to our state, also come with tremendous costs, arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium in the quantities they are introduced by water pollution have a major impact not only to our waters, the fish, but also for ou r citizens who look forward to safe drinking water. My family spent three years in Shanghai, China. I have witnessed first - hand how the lack of regulations by an agency like the EPA has compromised the Yangtze river, local waterways andEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 862 drinking water. Thi s forces citizens to purchase bottled drinking water. The long - term waste also from plastic bottles is astounding. Please consider a ruling update to require more stringent uses of newer technology to better control the waste. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Ireland Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5293 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our exposure to toxins need to be reduced in every way possible. Even when living a healthy lifestyle, many people are becoming ill with life threatening diseases. Please update current was tewater guidelines with stronger standards for limiting the amount of toxic heavy metals that can be discharged into surface water. Our drinking water comes mostly from surface water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. and G. McCray Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5294 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No C omment Excerpt: We are writing to plead with the EPA to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste by simply finalizing a stronger rule that will have the heft and strength that our future generations deserve - as both teachers an d parents this task is of monumental importance to us. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Henderson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5295 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 863 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Rules without enforcement are just words on paper. Yet the social and ecological systems that make our very existe nce possible are not paper. The EPA was given the "rules" in 1972 with the federal Clean Water Act; "minimize adverse environmental impacts" using the guiding principle "best technology available." Now 40 years later we still lack meaningful enforcement. T oday, best technology available means "closed - cycle systems:" The power plant industry can protect ecosystems and create systems that are not only efficient but are essentially waste free, but this industry needs "adult supervision:" I urge the Environment al Protection Agency to finalize the strongest standards possible. Once a firm target is set, this industry can transition from a cradle to grave [aka pollution] manifest to a closed - cycle business model that minimizes adverse environmental impacts protect s human health. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Tully Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5296 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am concerned that power plants return a great deal of water into our rivers along with byproducts of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium. I think this fact is unknown by many people and they would be surprised. It is a practice that silently goes on and that only you are in a position to remedy. Please implement strong standards to use the best technology available to remove these contaminants. Our long - term health and the river ecology is more important than the shortterm gain of the current situation. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Hasler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5297 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 864 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need the EPA to do everything in their power to keep our rivers and strea ms clean including holding power plants responsible for doing everything technically possible to reducing the amount and toxicity of waste that is expelled into our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. P. Gerardy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5298 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The most vital resources on this planet are the living inhabitants, all of which depend on the availability of adequate air and water. Degradation of these essential factors will impair the future for all living systems, including our own species. As we have developed technologies to improve our world, we have also generated refuse and toxins that must now be managed with greater care, or we will curtail our own development as well as that of the ecosystems we share. I am aware that the problems are diff icult, but ingenuity and courage have conquered such obstacles before, and can do so again. I urge you to demonstrate that courage and defend the premise for which your agency was created to revise the standards protecting our water and air to further limi t the amounts of pollutants that can be introduced to the atmospheric and hydrologic cycles we all depend on. Industry is important, as is power generation, but with significant incentives such endeavors could be refined to reduce the waste materials that are produced by their activities. The incentive is a continuing future for life on this planet. It is easy for a beleaguered populace to ignore the critical nature of these necessary restrictions. Trust has been placed in the agencies that are intended to oversee these processes. As guardians of the future, you are the defenders of that trust, and are called to act as protectors of resource quality, regardless of the arguments for convenience and profit. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. B. Maynard Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 865 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5299 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated int o Response: No Comment Excerpt: The Clean Water Act has certainly been one of the most progressive legislative enactments of the last century. I note that the regulations in question were last amended in 1982, and 1 think it is high time that the EPA req uired the best available technology to prevent and reduce point source pollution of surface waters by contemporary steam electric power plants. Thank you for registering my support for the most stringent practicable regulations. Comment Response: See resp onse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Stenerson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5300 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Externa l Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would like to express my concern regarding water pollution and encourage adopting a more protective option to protect our water supplies and creeks from further pollution. Coal - fired power plants contribute a significant amount of pollution to our lakes, rivers and streams and should be taking steps to reduce their pollution . Our wastewater discharge guidelines need to be updated such that they limit the amount of toxic heavy metals that are allo wed to be discharged into surface water. Most of our drinking water comes from surface water so updating the standards will reduce our risk of exposure to the toxic heavy metals. The rule should use the best available technology and be highly protective of our water supplies and waterways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Burke Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5301 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 866 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I'm in favor of updating our environmental practices in an effort to reduce heavy metal toxins and pollutants that affect our water. coal - fired power plants contribute over 50% of the toxic pollution in our lakes, rivers, and streams. Updating regulations that govern how these power plants discharge pollution into the environment is a critical concern for Boulder county residents. Comment R esponse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Nichols Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5302 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No Externa l Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With technological advances in water filtration and power generation, it is critical to look beyond vynat has been done in the past, and no longer assume that decisions made in the past, are good for the future (or even the past - knowing many political decisions are tied to interest groups with other vested priorities) . Please require the power producers to adhere to the strictest guidelines and regulations that can be set forth . I t is paramount for us as a society and culture to notice the flaws in what we do and what we see, and then take action against them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Webb Commenter Affi liation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5303 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 867 With the current regulations, the Boulder Colorado power plant discharges waste water into the Valmont Reservoir and consequently into Boulder Creek. The majority of Colorado's drinking water comes from surface water. Coal - fires power plants as in Boulder Colorado are one of the largest polluters and contribute more than 50% of toxin pollution to our lakes, rivers, and streams. It is time for the EPA to update the discharge guidelines and standards that are over 30 years old. Technology has improved greatly, there are options available. Please find them and improve our water and reduce our exposure to heavy metals. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Stenerson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5304 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In addition coal fired power plants should had stricter controls. Waste water discharges should be mo re closely regulated. Surface water standards should be upgraded. Thank you for your attention to these matters. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Montgomery Commenter Affiliation: Priv ate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5305 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a teacher, I am concerned about clean water for futur e generations. Please finalize strong rules to protect our waterways from toxic power plants waste water. Thank you for taking action for future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 868 Commenter Name : A. M. Cooper Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5306 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA has an opportunity to fulfill its mission to the American people. It can finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic power plant wastewater and thus protect the people, the fish, and the environment. Power plants have a responsi bility to reduce water pollution but to honor this responsibility, they must work with the EPA to accomplish it and the EPA has the responsibility to see that new, strong standards are implemented. These strong standards from the EPA are necessary to limit all power plant water pollution. We in the Southwest in drought areas understand how precious clean water is, both to us and to the environment. The U.S. has reached a tipping point regarding the dumping of toxic waste into our surface water. A continuati on of toxic dumping could ultimately lead to more sickness from drinking unsafe water. Water is our most precious commodity and I urge you to pass strong rules to protect not only the water but the whole environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. T. Chiles Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5307 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Inc orporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: All power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce pollution, especially from heavy metals. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Clark Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 869 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5309 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: St rict regulations for the prevention of toxic waste pollution must be enacted immediately to protect out waterways. It should be mandated that every power plant install and utilize thievery source of technology available to reduce their toxins expelled into the environment. The dumping of arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium into the watershed is unacceptable and irresponsible that can be prevented. This practice is shameful and should no longer be condoned by the United States government. Our water systems a re our lifeline, and the most valuable resource we have. It is time to protect them and save them. Firmly hold all power plants legally accountable for their destructive actions now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Wagner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5311 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment E xcerpt: Our power plants should be required to use the best technology available to both keep pollution to a minimum and ensure that our water systems are safe. I urge the EPA to impose these regulations on power plants. Comment Response: See response t o DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Connors Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5312 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 870 American families have the right to be protected from dangerous toxins that are known to cause cancer, related health problems, and lower children's IQ levels. Through implementation of strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution, the health of our rivers and streams will greatly improve. Our children and future generations deserve clean water and fish that are safe to eat. Please make our waters healthy again, our future depends upon your swi ft action. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Rykwalder Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5313 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External R eview Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am concerned about the waste water being released from our power plants. I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from t oxic wastewater. We have the technology to reduce pollution and the public's exposure to dangerous metals, such as arsenic, lead, and mercury. The power plants should be required to guard our safety and the health of future generations by using this techno logy. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. DeTomaso Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5314 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce greatly, the water pollution. Every year, these plants dump billions of pounds of arse nic, lead, mercury, and selenium into surface waters and cost us (the consumer and citizen), our health and quality of life. Children and adults are experiencing digestive issues far too often and few between. This has resulted in our need for pharmaceutic al assistance in daily living. What a shame! It’s time to end this reckless practice to protect our water, public health, and our Great Lakes way of life.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 871 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Goddard Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5315 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I think it is hig h time to have strong rules in tact to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. It's the power plant's responsibility to use best technology to reduce water pollution. After all, they are affected included their families al so. This is everyone's world. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Cohen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5316 - A1 Comment Excerpt Numbe r: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: American families have the right to be protected from dangerous toxins that are known to cause cancer, related health problems, and lower child ren's IQ levels. Through implementation of strong standards to limit all power power water pollution, the health of our rivers and streams will greatly improve. Our children and future generations deserve clean water and fish that are safe to eat. Please make our waters healthy again, our future depends upon your swift action. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Pereira Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EP A - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5317 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 872 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. As good corporate citizens, power plant operators should be required to use the best available technology to reduce and/or eliminate the discharge of arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium into water used while conducting p ower plant operations. As a science major (Biology and Chemistry), I am well aware of the dangers posed by these chemicals. I also know, as I am sure you are well aware, it is very difficult to predict the long term impact of these chemicals on the environ ment. As a public servant, your primary concern should be the health and welfare of the citizenry that are affected by these discharges. The industry is certainly capable of adapting stricter rules while maintaining their profitability. Please see to it th at the citizens of Colorado and the US are protected by implementing reasonable, safe, and environmentally sensible wastewater discharge rules. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. F. Lane and L. E. Coate Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5318 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We support a nd approve of any agency or group that is helping to bring about change to the release of toxic materials into our Texas Waterways, creeks, streams, ponds, rivers, and lakes. As news agency have reported the release of toxic materials from coal operated el ectrical plants into our lakes and rivers which has brought about unsafe conditions for humans and wildlife. High Mercury levels are destroying the natural balance of wildlife and industry which have already polluted many of these waterways thus making the m unsafe for humans and wildlife. Therefore we support the efforts to bring power plants in to compliance with the laws of the great state of Texas and by federal mandates to keep them from further damaging our eco structure and hopefully the repair to the damage already caused by toxic wastewater. We make this statement as way to bring attention this serious violation of EPA laws and to protect our environment and all our waterways.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 873 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt N umber 1. Commenter Name: J. Reed Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5319 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We urge you to pass a strong rule to finalize protection of our rivers. Each year, rivers, lakes, and ponds are lost due to water pollution. Also, the pollution can be harmful to not just the earth, but can cause cancer and lower some children's IQ. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Davis and L. Kozel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5320 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Externa l Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As the parents of two young children, few issues are more important to us than the protection of the environment. Power production, in particular, is a key area where stronger protections are desperately needed. We applaud the EPA's recent efforts toward tightening water pollution standards for power plants, and we urge you to stand up to the coal industry and finalize these rulings. Power plants must be held to high standards to minimize water pollution, especially from heavy metals. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. R. Gray Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5321 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 874 Comment Excerpt: I ask the EPA to enact stronger legislation to protect our waterways from power plant waste wa ter emissions. Coal may be a cheap fuel, but plants should be using the latest technology to protect the air from contaminants. It has been a long time since these regulations have been updated, and technology has come a long way since then. Power plants s hould use the latest technology to remove as many heavy metals and toxic compounds from the water as possible . Having strong standards will ensure the water we have will remain free from contaminants so that we and our children can enjoy it as drinking wa ter and for recreation in the years to come. I realize that using newer technology will add to the cost of energy, but I would rather pay more for energy than endanger my children's health. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, E xcerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. P. Lane Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5322 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please update our standards to protect our waterways from power plant emissions. Texas has the highest content of mercury levels in our waterways, which is a direct result of allowing coal - fired power plants to pollute at ridicously high levels. Local streams and lakes significantly enhance the quality of life in Austin Texas. Without them, Austin would truely be just like another hot Texas city. Please do not facilitate the continued poisining of our fish, plants, and children. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. S. Maddox Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5323 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Ext ernal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 875 I don't want to be poisoned. I also don't want my children, friends, frends' children, and the environment generally to be poisoned. But my family also likes to swim in our loca l water source, Lake Travis. And families all over Texas love to enoy themselves in water sports. None of us wants a side order of mercury with our fun day on the sun. Power plants are big. They already involve a lot of infrastructure, and they emit a larg e amount of polltion. This makes them the perfect opportunity for improvement - you know the specific point where the pollution enters the environment. Stop it before it ends up in the lake my third grade daughter is swimming in. Finalize a strong rule to protect our waterways from toxic power plant wastewater. If you wouldn't let your own families swim in it, why would you let other families? Strong standards limiting all power plant water pollution will improve the health of the aquatic environments, and the health of the people who enjoy them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. M. Donahue Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5324 - A1 Commen t Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA must finalize strong rules to protect Texas water from toxic power plant wastewater. I believe that Power Plants should be required to use the best technology available to reduce pollution in our water. Water supplies in Texas are being poisoned by arsenic, lead, mercury, etc, being dumped in by these polluters . Water is an increasingly s carce resource in Texas, and we must protect the quality of our water! PLEASE : Push for strong standards to limit ALL power plant water pollution! Please help to ensure clean, safe water for future generations of Texans. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Deacon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5325 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review I ncorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 876 Comment Excerpt: As a father of 3 young children, I urge the EPA to implement the strongest rule possible to protect our waterways from toxic power plant emissions and wastewater. Time is past due to require industries such as power plants to use the best technology available to reduce pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Wanfried Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5326 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I'm writing to you in regard to Docket ID EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819. As a citizen of today and a mom of our next generation, I'd like to voice my strong support of the EPA's efforts to ensure power plant responsibility and accountability when it comes to toxic emissions. These uncontrolled or under - controlled substances are an enormous immediate threat to t he well - being of our planet, it's species, and our civilization. I appreciate your time, consideration and action on behalf of all of us who cherish the health or our planet, our children, and ourselves. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Anonymous Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5327 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I feel power plants and other places should be under rules and regulations that will make a healthier world for the generations to come.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 877 Let's stop worrying about eating French fries or drin king a large soda. Get your priorities in order. The USA was once a happy healthy land. What is it now due to all of these toxic chemicals. People bring babies into this world. Are these babies going to be healthy? Are they going to make it to Adult hood? Get with the program. Act today for a safer tomorrow. Maybe you can't think right on this issue because the toxics have already gotten to you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Geer Comm enter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5328 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need the power plants to grea tly control the water pollution to make our water ways a safe place to fish. We get great pleasure and enjoyment from these waters and wouldn’t it be wonderful if our great - great grandchildren could enjoy them also. Comment Response: See response to DCN E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Abilheira Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5329 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Inco rporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: With the recent rush of dolphin deaths along the east coast, I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams and lakes from the toxic power plant and other run - off waste water. Power plants and other polluters should be required to use the best available technology to reduce as much water pollution as possible.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 878 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Yarger Commenter Affil iation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5330 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The EPA needs to set a solid rule in order to protect our waters from power plant wastewater. The EPA needs to enforce lesser or almost no pollution from the power plants. I'm concerned for the fish I consume from the Jersey shores. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, E xcerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Anastasi Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5331 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am very concerned and appalled that the EPA does not regulate power plant pollution. The public blinding trusts our tax dollars to be used to protect us and our environment. I have seen the bay go from an abundant recreation and food s ource to a dividing suffering waterway. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: (name illegible) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5332 - A1 Comm ent Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 879 The water is being polluted and I urge that we protect our drinking water. In reference to Docket ID: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819, we need to stop pollution immediately via all efforts necessary. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Desrouleaux Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 20 09 - 0819 - 5333 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I write to encourage the EPA to strengthen measures to protect our estuaries and bodies of water from toxi c waste. Alternatives to current plant methods should be worked on and made available. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Kramer Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control N umber: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5335 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please consider the amplifications of regulations for coal ash and its methods of disp osal. We as a community are deeply concerned of its effects on the environment and the Bay. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Makell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5336 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 880 I agree that we should have some type of federal regulations to protect the w ater and air that we breathe. EPA should want cleaner air and water to protect our lives. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Hempell Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Contr ol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5338 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We support Clean Water Action and care about our waterways. I want water pollution to stop and strong standards in place to accomplish that. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: (name illegible) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 5339 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support the most protective option to update discharge guidelines and standards for coal - fired power plan ts. Let's reduce our risk of exposure to toxic heavy metals in the drinking water we all consume. Let us protect ourselves and our environment with intelligent and thoughtful fixes and guidelines. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. R. Diprofio Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5340 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Res ponse: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 881 We need much stronger laws to protect our children and all people from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants need to use their technology to reduce pollution like arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium into surface waters. W e need to improve the health of our people, through healthy river and stream to make safer drinking water and fish. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. McPherson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5341 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I worked for Aldolph Coors Company in Process & Envi ronment control for 22 years. We were winners of several awards from EPA. We have been responsible to keep the quality of the water from the wastewater discharge of both the Brewery and Golden city to the best quality. When we were with the EPA for the Cl ean Water Act, it was basically diluted down to a shadow of the form it was in 1980's. They should update and use the best practice to keep the water from Colorado the best in the world. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Exce rpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Whitsel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5342 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We urge you to adopt the strongest rule and standards to protect our rivers and lakes, streams, and our drinking water sources from industrial water polluters. Please enact long over due Clean Water Act standards to limit the amount of t oxic metals & chemicals that can be dumped into our water system. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Ruberg Commenter Affiliation: Private CitizenEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 882 Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 200 9 - 0819 - 5344 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would strongly urge the EPA to finalize an extremely necessary strong rule to protect all our rivers, lak es and streams from toxic power plant waste waters produced by energy - generation be it coal fired, nuclear or whatever. All power plants including what may be outdated and substandard coal and oil fired utilities that have been exempted unless a sufficient percentage of change was proposed should now be compelled to use the most underrun and effective technologies. Reducing the reckless introduction of heavy metals and poisons such as arsenic, lead, mercury, selenium and cadmium and God know what else into our water supply should be your goal. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. J. Freeman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5345 - A1 Comment E xcerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: My family and I live in Boulder CO and I am concerned with the amount of heavy metals being discharged from Excel's coal fired plan t. The discharge is going into Boulder creek, a key watershed in our town and an area I like to take my 2 year old daughter to enjoy. I believe that the current discharge guidelines must be updated in order to keep this area safe, beautiful and healthy for generations to come. The proposed rule should provide the most protection available. If this means our electricity rates go up, we are more than willing to pay to protect our regions water. Thank you for all that you do to keep our environment safe. Comme nt Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Peluso Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5346 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 883 External Review Flag: No Exte rnal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need assurance that the water we consume does not contain any contaminants caused by dumping of chemicals in our water supply. Power plants have to be held responsible for the ir harmful practices. We all need clean water to survive. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Grant Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 53 47 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would like the EPA to create better laws to protect our lakes, streams and rivers from the horrible toxic wastewat er. I should be able to swim in our waterways but I can’t due to the health problems I would h have if I did. Please make better laws to help our water ways. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Haider Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5348 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I believe it is necessary to determine a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. Since these plants dump harmful substances into surface water, they should be required to reduce amount of pollution through technologic al advancements. Stronger standards will improve the water we drink and fish we eat by making them much safer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 884 Commenter Name: P. Peters Commenter Affiliation: Private Ci tizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5349 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Immediate request to put in place strict rules and protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste and profit greedy owners of these plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Parizeau Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Docum ent Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5352 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I write to ask that a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and stream s be finalized to protect from toxic plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Fitch Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5356 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly encourage the EPA to finalize the guidelines to regulate coal ash pollution. This needs to be a law! It is a bsolutely ridiculous that power plants aren't being held accountable for destroying America's waterways. It is crazy, I mean what is government for? Please do the right thing. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 885 Commenter Name: S. Berns Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5358 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am joining Clean Water Action in their advocacy for requiring power plants to clean up all of their pollution, not just some of it. Our clean drinking water has served to reduce sickness and improve the health of our citizens. In instances where the EP A has relaxed its standards, serious illness and death has resulted. Please ensure that our rivers and streams are free from arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium and other chemicals and toxins. Please keep us safe. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Tran Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5359 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. These are highly toxic and known to be carcinogens. It is time to end this practice. It has also been found that by adopting more green practices not only do you decrease harmful emissions but it ends up cutting costs and saving money for the company in the long run. Not only are the general public affected by this but the children and you are also be ing harmed. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. W. Foster Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5360 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 886 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am concerned about the future of our planet. I have watched the world change in many ways which, if not controlled, will change the world substantially for my children and grandchildren, not to mention future generations. We must do what we can NOW to stem these changes. It is time to end this reckless practice and to fine all plants that continue to dump these pollutants. It is imperative that such standard s be set and that they be enforced. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. R. Cubley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5361 - A1 Comment Exce rpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please help establish statutes and regulations to protect our rivers, lakes and streams and oceans from all non - biodegradable waste su ch as toxic power plant waste and plastic products. With new technology and research, pollution should be reduced or eliminated to protect our environment for the health and future of the earth's ecosystem. If we destroy water supply, the life that is depe ndent on it will not survive. Our way of life starts with the people on top. Lead us to a healthy future. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. R. Allen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citi zen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5362 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 887 I insist that the EPA finalize a power plant wastewater toxicit y rule that would protect our lakes, rivers, streams, deltas, oceans, etc. GET IT!! We don't want toxic, dirty sources. PERIOD! It may be easier and cheaper for power companies, but it's killing us, and the planet we live on. I'm not OK with billions of po unds of arsenic, lead, mercury, selenium, etc. into surface waters. This reckless practice has got to stop. Come to your senses on a human level or we will become extinct. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Fannily Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5364 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Already, over 23,000 miles of streams and rivers across the country are contaminated with power plant wastewater. Without stricter limits, your agency has estimated the amount of toxics discharged by these plants are going to increase by 28 percent over th e next 15 years. Protecting our water is tantamount to preserving the beauty of my home in the Great Lakes State and protecting the health of American everywhere. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers, lakes, and streams, keeping us safe and ensuring the beauty of our environment will be preserved for generations to come. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. A. Nickels Commenter Affiliat ion: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5365 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support the EPA and urge them to finalize a strong rule to protect our lakes and rivers from toxic power plant wastewater. The plants should use the most current, modern technology toEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 888 purify the water that leaves the plant. Make it so the utility compani es can't use loopholes and continue to pollute because the law says they can use some old 1960's standard or the like. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Bailey Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5366 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly urge the EPA to finalize a ruling protect ing our rivers, lakes and streams from power plant pollution. Rather than poisoning our waters and changing the habitat of nature around these areas, power plants need to be held accountable for the damage done to our environment. We need them held liable to strong standards rather than saving money. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Rose (surname illegible) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 081 9 - 5367 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: EPA has just projected long overdue plant pollution standards to limit the amount of toxic metals and other chem icals that can be dumped into our waters. Unfortunately, the coal industry is already trying to block them. Tell EPA to require power plants to clean up all their pollution, not just some of it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2 265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: V. Soriano Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5368 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 889 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response : No Comment Excerpt: I would like to see the power plants be required to reduce or eliminate the pollutants they discharge into our lakes, rivers, and streams. A strong standard on pollutants would insure that our waterways continue to remain clean for current and future generations. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Rodriquez Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5369 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please EPA, help protect our lakes, rivers and streams from toxic waste, by setting new laws to help prevent polluting our waters. Each ti me a power plant discharges waste, we wind up drinking or eating its waste. Please set stronger standards for all plants to reduce the amount of pollution they make. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commen ter Name: W. King Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5370 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongl y encourage the EPA to complete and enforce a ruling to protect all streams lakes, rivers, and waterways from any and all toxic power plant wastewater and runoff. It should be a law/requirement that the best available technology be used and maintained if p ossible; to reduce any and all harmful contaminants, chemicals, metals and other hazardousEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 890 byproducts into any and all surrounding waters. It should only be considered safe after approved monitoring and responsible filtration and plant urgency. This should have never been allowed to get this far without laws and prevention in place. There are far too many unsavory practices that go on; for the benefit of profit that do not respect nature or the earth we are all part of. There should be NO reasonable limit t o the responsibility that the power plants should take to prevent the runoff and contamination of public water and surrounding area. The irresponsible practices must be stopped immediately! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Saliss Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5374 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support higher standards on the types and amounts of heavy metals and other toxic chemicals currently allowed to be discharged by power plants into our streams and rivers. The water we drink has been processed to remove most toxins, bu t not all are removed. Fish and other wildlife don't have processed water! The levels allowable for human consumption should be as low as technology permits. Adding toxic chemicals to anything (other than poisons) can't be a good thing Comment Response: S ee response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Mckibbin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5375 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review E xternal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Don't let the corporations dictate what should or should not be done. Keep them accountable for their waste and good stewards of our earth! Don't let them win this one!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 891 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Sheckler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5376 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Ext ernal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water is vitally important. Please don't mess about, fix this NOW. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Long Commenter A ffiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5377 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I need your "agency" to stand up to pow er plant mega pollution. Where are the federal regulations to protect our air and water from toxins? The coal industry is dumping chemical waste and toxic metals into the environment in increasing amounts. This citizen wants to know what EPA is getting don e. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Ryder Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5379 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is time that the EPA set higher standards by creating a deal to protect our bodies of water, fish, and ourselves from toxic power plant wastewater.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 892 It is time to update the rule and regulations set forth for power plant industrial pollution. This pollution will only worsen, along with our health. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: (name illegible) Commente r Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5380 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We support the cause and concerns specified in the Docket ID No. EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Carson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5381 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to stop dumping of toxins into our environments water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Carson Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5381 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Resp onse: No Comment Excerpt: I recently learned that there are very few restrictions on the amount of chemicals and waste that are being dumped into our waters from local power plants. With the technology we have available to us in this day and age, there s hould be a better way to lessen this waste.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 893 Please, I urge you, for the sake of our children's future, to enforce stricter rules and regulations on limiting power plant pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Num ber 1. Commenter Name: P. Wentz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5382 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excer pt: I recently learned that there are very few restrictions on the amount of chemicals and waste that are being dumped into our waters from local power plants. With the technology we have available to us in this day and age, there should be a better way to lessen this waste. Please, I urge you, for the sake of our children's future, to enforce stricter rules and regulations on limiting power plant pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name : S. Balser Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5383 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge you to f

inalize strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution to make all water we drink and all fish we eat safer. My family grew up eating the bounty from the Chesapeake Bay and they rely on the bay for their lively hoods. It's getting harder and ha rder for families to make their living this way. Please help! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Grijial Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0 819 - 5388 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 894 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a health care provider who sees people with several medical conditions it is of outmost concern that we protect our community from noxious metals dump into air & community. It is time to end this reckless practice. It is time to ensure strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of rivers & streams, making the water we d rink safer. It is time for us to be responsible and take action NOW. Thank you. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Laykasek Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number : EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5390 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: While I understand the competing priorities between clean water and low cost electricity, we cannot sacrifice our rivers and lakes in the process. We must have strong rules that require power plants to the best available technology to keep pollution and heavy metals from our water. I urge the EPA to make clean water a priority. Comment Response : See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Laykasek Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5391 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Revi ew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: EPA must protect our water. No H2O = No Life.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 895 Coal power plants poison water

– your job is to fix it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. C ommenter Name: R. Rosencrante Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5392 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to you about the coal plant water pollution standards. Because the majority of the water for drinking in Colorado comes from surface water the degree of toxins in the water is something that impacts human and animal life beyond any environm ental concerns. Current wastewater guidelines allow toxic metals to be discharged into rivers lakes and streams which presents real health risks. These standards need to be strengthened to limit the amount of toxic heavy metals in the water. I ask that you should adopt the proposed rule that uses the best available technology and that which is the most protective option available. Protecting health and the environment are essential issues. Although on the face of it they may appear to be a financial burden it reflects the true cost and through creating requirements often solutions that both save money & the environment can be found. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Young Commenter Affili ation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5393 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge EPA to finalize a strong rule to prot ect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. Strict rules and regulations should already be in place protecting our vital water resources. Current technologies should be utilized by power plants to comply with required actions for d rastic pollution reductions - especially from heavy metals. All power plant water pollution must be eradicated in an urgent and most expeditious manner - time is not on our side. Make the water we drink and the fish we eat safer for everyone.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 896 Comment Respons e: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Szanto Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5394 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Revie w External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Waste is a huge problem as a human being. We produce and produce and life is grand, but the cost? The waste we leave behind is not justifiable by ease of living. Now we have to slow down and think that maybe polluting our water ways is not the best way to live easy. The ends don't really justify the means. Now is the time to step up and and lay down some law. These things take time and diligence, respect and understanding, and if there is no respect and understanding in those who need it most, it must be forced upon them! The technology is out there. People get stuck in their ways, it's easier to plan for a future that looks like the past, except, while the practices may remain unchang ed the effects compound and worsen. Look at the whole image, respect the environment. We don't have long in this world, why must we rush toward ruining it? Set some standards! LIMIT ALL POWER PLANT WATER POLLUTION! Water is one of the more fundamental b uilding blocks of life, we should respect it and take care of our water ways

... One less thing to get cancer from, right? Cancer is not much fun. Anything we can do to have clean water, a healthy ecosystem, and less cancer is worth fighting for. Please , get the lead out!... of our waterways ... also, take action. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Loudin Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5395 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 897 I urge you to replace your out - dated guidelines with strong standards limiting discharge from factories and power plants into our precious creeks and rivers. Hold Excel Energy, among others accountable, and require them to meet these higher standards. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name : D. Davis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5396 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please protect o ur rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater. I would like my children and grandchildren to enjoy the clean water we have left them. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. R ogers Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5397 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please keep coal dust from being dumped in our waterways. Who needs to drink heavy metals and other contaminants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Halley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Cont rol Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5401 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 898 I urge the EPA to stop putting toxins in the water. Comment Response: See respon se to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Yuknas Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5402 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Rev iew Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to do the job the American people have entrusted them with

– to protect our environment

– especially our rivers, lakes and streams. Listen to the people

– not the lobbyists

– stop industr ial power plants from dumping toxins into our water, poisoning the food we eat and contaminating our sources of fresh drinking water. Please support a stronger Clean Water Act, with stricter standards that limit what and how much can be dumped into our wat er. Most importantly, have stricter sanctions in place when toxins are dumped and make it mandatory, not optional, to clean up their mess. Thank you for time and consideration. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Numbe r 1. Commenter Name: C. Sison Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5403 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Protecting our rivers, lakes, and streams from toxic power plant wastewater should be top priority. Our health and our children's future will definitely suffer if this reckless practice of polluting our waters is not stopped or at least drastica lly reduced. It would greatly benefit everybody if stricter rules are implemented and those who do not abide by such rules are held accountable. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 899 Commenter Name: S. Lott Co mmenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5404 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a parent and grandparent I am concerned about the water my family is drinking. Since the time I moved here, I felt the need to have a purification system installed in my home so that I know the water I'm drinking does not contain heavy toxic metals. I believe that new standards need to be adopted to reduce our exposure to toxic heavy metals. Please consider updating guidelines so that the best technology available is being used Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Nas ky Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5405 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I would like the EPA to p ut pressure on polluting power plants. That is ALL OF THEM! Do not jeopardize our water supply because it is all we will ever have. If people get sick than we are only to blame ourselves. The earth truly deserves our protection for the rest of our days and that means no more thoughtlessness. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Paul Ling Commenter Affiliation: Kansas City Power & Light Company Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5406 - A2 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 900 KCP&L recognizes the importance of this new look at the steam electric ELG since EPA and states have required plants t o add air emission control technology that may produce new waste streams warranting such evaluation under the CWA. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Kinchy Commenter Affiliation: Privat e Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5409 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Current discharge guidelines and standards for power plant s are over 30 years old and place no limits on toxic metals discharged into our waterways. These guideline are overdue for an update and new rules must require strong standards for limiting these toxic discharges in to our surface water. Please fight for n ew regulations that use the best available technology and be the most protective of our desperately needed water resources. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Colvin Commenter Affiliation : Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5412 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I was very dismayed and disappointed to learn today that the EPA has been allowing power plants to dump their extremely toxic wastewater into our rivers, lakes, and streams. This is yet another case where the EPA has not been fulfilling their duty to prote ct our national resources. They have been putting our citizens health and that of the environment at risk by allowing this very reckless practice. I therefore, urge the EPA to promptly finalize the strongest rules possible, requiring power plants utilize t he best available technology to reduce as much water pollution as possible. The future of our people and wildlife depends on it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 901 Commenter Name: M. Mannas Commenter Affili ation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5415 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need you to finalize the strongest standa rd possible to keep power plant pollution out of our water sources. As a student that studied the Chesapeake Bay for a semester, I would love for this to be implemented. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Co mmenter Name: G. Ellen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5420 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need to protect our drinking water sources from power plant pollution. You need to finalize a strong standard to keep heavy metals out of our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. Nog ay Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5421 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Thirteen waterways are no longer useable due to the high mercury content in Texas. The Mercury is from coal - fired power plants. The cleaner technology is available for power plants; we should make sure all power plants are protecting our environment to the best of their ability. S trong standards to limit all power plant pollution is crucial and I can't believe we haven't updated power plant waterway emissions since 1982. Get your act together.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 902 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Comme nter Name: P. Yeamen Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5423 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: EPA

– do your job! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Ingram Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5424 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Re view Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Texas rivers, lakes and streams should have strong rules for protection from any power plants in the state of Texas to stop dumping any type of pollution that w ill affect humans and animals with health problems pertaining to our safety for our water consumption. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Deleon Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5425 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a needed rule to protect our rivers, lake s and power plants wastewater. We need to hold power plants accountable for the pollution they produce and require they do what is necessary to reduce pollution.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 903 The government has a responsibility to ensure that our water is safe. Comment Response: See r esponse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Anonymous Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5426 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Externa l Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our world is surrounded by nearly 2/3 water. Our country is bordered by oceans, seas, and lakes. We have major rivers, thousands of streams and all are in danger caused by pollution. I urge the EPA to make tougher laws to protect our oceans, rivers, and streams, from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Holeler Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5428 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Water is a critical resource for everyone. Please take every measure to protect this valuable resource, particularly by limiting discharge of toxins and heavy metals into streams and rivers from coal - fired power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Hawke Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5429 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 904 Comment Excerpt: Please protect our riv ers, lakes and streams from all toxic waste water. All factories and power plants should use the latest technology to eliminate pollution. There needs to be rules and standards that everyone uses including big factories and power plants to protect and save our planets water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Milner Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5431 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Exte rnal Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please make it law for power plants to have their wastewater meet a safe level of pollution. The waste in the water will find its way up the food chain w hether you're a herbivore, carnivore, omnivore, or something in between. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Dix Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5433 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am pleased hear that on April 19 th the EPA submitted a proposed rule to update discharge sta ndards and guidelines. I support the most protective options to reduce or eliminate toxic compounds discharged into our surface water & air. I encourage, and am in favor of enterprises passing on the increased costs of such pollution mitigation measures to the end user, and legislation required to ensure these protective measures are followed. The power generation sector is among the largest of polluters and the cost of energy is simply too cheap, not paying for the full social cost of its generation.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 905 Comm ent Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: V. Mahalingam Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5434 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize an effective, efficient, and restrictive rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams and other bodies of water from toxic power plant waste wate r. Please require power plants to use the best available technology to reduce water pollution. It’s time to end this reckless practice by: a. Changing practices and consumption b. Mandating the use of less toxic chemicals in manufacturing. c. Mand ating manufacturers to find alternative deposits for harmful waste. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Grant H. (no surname provided) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5435 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am afraid for a future not too far from a science fiction movie, where the rivers are devoid of life and the air is poisonous. The EPA MUST prevent this. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Eizker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5436 - A1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 906 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I’m encouraging the EPA to take all necessary measures to safeguard waters from the toxins produced b y wastewater from power plants. I expect the EPA to require power plants to use the highest level of technology to reduce toxins that are released into our rivers, lakes and streams so that we can ensure quality of life for future generations. Comment Resp onse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Newmann Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5438 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External R eview External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing with regards to clean water; specifically our rivers, streams, lakes and oceans. It is my understanding that power companies are not maximizing available technology to red uce pollutants such as: heavy metals (mercury, lead cadmium) and poisons such as: arsenic, selenium, in high concentrations. The results of pollution and human poisoning via drinking water and food such as fish, plants irrigation water, and animals used fo r food (eating and drinking polluted water). Please do not let the peoples of this great republic down. Please stop the reckless polluting of out water. We need to use less energy by far, but the sources still need to be responsibly producing what is neces sary. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: F. Deelongh Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5439 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 907 Comment Excerpt: I write to you with hope that you actually take time to read this letter and with even more hope that you act upon it. A young gentleman from the Clean Water Action came to my home (actually found time out of his life to do this) and informed me that power plants currently have a legal right to dump their wastewater into the rivers and lakes of our beautiful state of Colorado, and all over the United States. I am not yet a citizen of the United States, however I am working to become a member of this society. However, I wish to be in the United States of America, not the United wasteland where the nation poisons its own people by allowing waste to be dumped in our water . I doubt you would like to be a citizen of that nation either. This is why I urge you to do the following: * I urge the EPA to perform its service to the people to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. * I urge petition s to re - read the constitution and the Federalist papers in order to remind themselves who they represent and to stop this atrocity. * Require power plants to develop more efficient technology. To filter out the crap in water and to reduce water pollution. * Strong standards ought to put in place to limit all power plant water pollution in order to improve the health of rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer. Don’t do this just because we ask you to

– do it because you want t o show that you have respect for our nation, our people, and posterity. Perform your civil duty and enforce the above contentions. I thank you in advance and remember

– you hold our future in your hands. Do something to preserve it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. Millison Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5442 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review Exte rnal Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean fresh drinking water is already scarce around the world. Living in the United States we are often unaware of how privileged we are to have the many available commodities, such as water, so available.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 908 The large amounts of ash or residue that are ignorantly disposed of in our lakes, rivers, and streams threatens the quality of life that is present in this region of the world. Protecting the environment from our own waste is a very important m ove to protect future generations. Countries that continue to neglect their environment and economy will suffer sever consequences! I, along with many others, propose that the current wastewater discharge guidelines be renewed. “Clean Water Action” suggest strong standards to limit the amounts of Toxic heavy metals that are currently being discharged into Colorado Waters. I agree strongly with this suggestion! “One person can make a difference and every person should try.”

– John F. Kennedy There is an abun dance of renowned people who are quoted as believers in the power each individual has to make a difference. I also believe this is true and hope that each letter supports a positive change in current business ethics. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: (name illegible) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5443 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing because of my deep concern about the water we drink, cook with and shower with etc., I urge the EPA to please finalize a strong rule to protect our water from toxic power plant waste water. I worry that my children or rest of my family could become deathly ill from the water that these power plants dump every year. I feel the power plants should be responsible for what is being dumped. We as a community are asked not to dump poisons or old medi cations down the toilet as it can be harmful to our water. If we as a community can monitor what we dump to keep our water safe, why can’t these power plants be responsible to do it too. So many toxins are dumped by these power plants every year and they don’t think twice about it. The power plants should be responsible for what they do and stop contaminating our water. I know I am only one person but I am sure the rest of the community would agree with me. I am tired of being scared to take a drink of wat er from the sink and for the my family to drink water from the sink in fear that we may get cancer or something other horrible disease from drinking the waterEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 909 I beg you to please set a strong standard to limit all power plants from dumping their polluted w aste water into our rivers, lakes and streams. Please require there to be responsible for a safe way to dispose of these toxins. I thank you for your time. Please make our water better so we can go to sleep at night and not worry that we will wake up sick with some horrid disease from it Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Iuppa Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5444 - A1 Comment Excerpt Num ber: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: After spending 2 years with my family in China I have seen the impact of soft regulations on competitive industries, competitive free enterpr ise cannot self regulate, not when it involves a cost. And the health of a country is taking permanent damage. We have our own dark history even though we have raised the bar. Technology changes, and we need to ensure we don’t wait for disaster to regulate . We need to keep safety first. The spend will still come in industry as long as the field is level and there is a Profit. We as Americans have given trust in you to be over the interests of the industries profit in any case. Raise the bar for our health. They will adopt and move forward and their industry will benefit from new technologies. Without leadership for the people from the government, we will be exposed. See China cancer rates..... Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Ex cerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. L. Pecora Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5445 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I strongly suggest the EPA work to set stricter guidelines and use them to protect our state’s Fresh water from any further damage.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 910 If the EPA fails the state will lose it greatest resource

– Tourist Dollars! Michigan as a state can bare ly handle the “Detroit issue”; the nation will then be forced to handle the resulting “Michigan issue” Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Eberbach Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5446 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our potable fresh water is a precious resource which much of the world would kill for! It is an issue of Worldwide Public Health, international Politics, life and death, and more. Change can start right here in Michigan! As the steward of the Great Lakes, a signicant portion of the Earth's fresh potable water, Michigan needs to lead the development of strong standards for limiting pollution which devalues our water resources. The Power Plants are a good place to start, since the present waste disposal rules need updating and the energy industry is amenable to win - win pio neering regulations for the public benefit as well as their own reputation . Given what we have !earned during the past several decades in biotechnology, and the worth of the clean water we still have, we can implement stricter and better conceived standar ds for protecting that worth. We can do it first here in Michigan, and perhaps following our lead, for the rest of the planet, to make fresh water natural resources which we drink, with which we irrigate our farms, and in which the fish we eat gather our n utrition.. . or poison ..SAFER for us all. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. M. Dunn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5448 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I request for the state of Michigan’s benefit that the EPA finalize a stronger rule towards our rivers, lakes and streams.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 911 To upd ate rules on power plants, disposal and storage of toxic waste is a necessary indicative. Power plants release of levels of arsenic, lead mercury and selenium damages both human environments, natural ecosystems of Michigan’s fish as wildlife as well as the integrity of the lakes and water bodies. I hold it valuable that the present regulations be modified to limit all power plant water pollution standards in a better light. For the preservation of the natural beauty, health and economy of Michigan. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. M. Varis Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5449 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Exter nal Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This letter is to advocate to the EPA to settle for the strong ruling to protect our environment - our rivers, lakes, streams and ponds from toxic power plant wastewater. It prote cts us as humans as well as the eco - life that is needed for our planet to survive. My late father George A. Varis was a Senior Engineer for Ensearch (Ebasco) in Manhattan, NY, now TXU (Texas). He designed nuclear power plants and also did consulting work f or Shoream at Indian Point, Long Island, NY, as well as Con Edison in NYC. He also worked at Hauk in CT. My father, always said that Nuclear Power Plants in the United States took years of careful designing and precautions. They could not fail, unlike the foreign counterparts, such as Russia which leaked. American - made nuclear power plants have the ability to use the latest technology. Then, there were economic downsizing decisions and changes made by companies. The companies transferred the American educat ed engineers to other states to force retirement or leave. These actions were taken in order to bring in newly arrived foreign educated engineers for low cost salaries. They had to be trained by American engineers but did not study in our schools or unders tand the process over the years. If my father were alive today, with the care and excellence that he brought to his work, he would strongly urge, as I am now, for companies to use the best available technology to reduce as much water pollution as possible . He believed and always took interest in the upcoming technology, as I am interested. Quality in design, safety, technology and excellence in process is part of American work ethic. We as human beings need clean water to survive. We cannot exhaust the res ources we are given to live on. Strong standards to limit all power plant water pollution will improve the health of the rivers and streams, making the water we drink and the fish we eat safer.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 912 Again, I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes, streams and ponds from toxic power plant wastewater for human beings and our eco - life to survive on this planet . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: H. L. Gauntt Commenter Af

filiation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5452 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am a strong believer in the developmen t and utilization of a variety of power sources for our region and for our nation, but I also believe that any and all sources of power should be required to use the best technology available to ensure that a proper balance is maintained between satisfying our nation's need for power and the protection of vital resources such as our Great Lakes . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. D. Piehl and M. MacCleery Commenter Affiliation: Private C itizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5453 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We must stop our current misuse of land, water and air by jus t piling up the fly ash and letting it sit there forever: letting the sulfur and metals leach into our ground and surface waters, and permanently removing that land from its former use - around here, probably forest or farming. Forest and farming provides be nefits for all of us, forever. Turning it into a pile of fly ash destroys that use forever. Which if we allow it to happen, our grandchild(ren) will be fully justified in blaming us. Again, please enact rules to process power plant wastewater, and protect our land, water and air. Doing anything else is just wrong. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 913 Commenter Name: E. D. Piehl and M. MacCleery Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5453 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We urge you to finalize strong rules to protect our streams and Great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Power plants greatly impact our homeland, particularly coal - fired plants. Wet scrubbers are great - they are much better than baghouses, electrostatic precipitators, which in turn are all much better than nothing. But we must process the ou tput of those scrubbers, baghouses and electrostatic precipitators:

 Remove the sulfur, and sell it.  If practical, remove the lead, mercury, arsenic and selenium, and sell those.  Remove the fly ash, an? sell as much as we can to cinderblock and concrete man ufacturers. If we can't sell all of it, take the remainder, dry it, and send it back to Wyoming/Appalachia in the same rail cars that brought the coal, where the mines will return it to the mine site before restoring the topsoil layer.  And if the plant's o peration removes the ash dry (I am thinking here of baghouses and precipitators), don't let the plant operator let it get wet. If they do, the operator will always complain about the cost of moving or drying it! Please enact rules to accomplish the above w ithout delay. As parents of three, and grandparents of one (so far), we care about the legacy we leave our decedents. As Stewards of our precious finite land, water and air, we must - as long as coal - fired power plants exist - implement the plan above. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: L. Roper Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5456 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Externa l Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 914 I am concerned about the state of our environment and all of the pollution such as arsenic, lead, mercury, and more that are being recklessly dumped into our waterways and Great Lak es. I urge the EPA to finalize ruling to protect our water from power plant in particular who are responsible in part for the pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Cappleman Comme nter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5457 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a citizen of these United Stat es and the Earth, I call for the EPA to set strong standards and regulations that require power plants to use the latest and most effective technologies to keep the toxins they produce from polluting the rivers, lakes and oceans in and around our country. We need action now to insure that our planet is safe for future generations. Water is a precious resource that is required for almost all life on our planet. It is our duty to protect this precious resource! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Nagel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5458 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated int o Response: No Comment Excerpt: As a citizen of these United States and the Earth, I call for the EPA to set strong standards and regulations that require power plants to use the latest and most effective technologies to keep the toxins they produce from polluting the rivers, lakes and oceans in and around our country. We need action now to insure our planet is safe for future generations. Water is a precious resource that is required for almost all life on our planet. It is our duty to protect this preci ous resource!Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 915 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Kavulia Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5459 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Cheap electricity and higher corporate profits do not trump the health and well - being of the current and future citizens of this country. I was shocked to lea rn that wastewater containing heavy metals from the scrubbing process is routinely dumped directly into rivers, the same rivers that supply drinking water for cities and towns all across the country. This is a reckless, unhealthy and potentially lethal pra ctice that must be stopped and the technology exists to stop it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Luttermoser Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5460 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I'm writing because I'm concerned about toxic power plant wastewater. It's ludicrous, and it's time to stop turning a blind eye and actually do something about it. I implore the EPA to place strong standards to limit ALL power plant water pollution. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. Wagne r Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5461 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 916 Comment Excerpt: Power plants are the bigge st industrial water polluters, yet the standards to protect our drinking water sources and our rivers, lakes, streams and bays from their toxic discharges have not been updated since 1982. Wastewater from coal - fired power plants is especially nasty. It con tains high levels of arsenic, lead, mercury and other pollutants. These toxins are known to cause cancer, lower children's IQ and cause other health problems. Over 23,000 miles of streams and rivers are already contaminated with power plant wastewater. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency predicts that without strict limits, power plant toxic discharges will increase by 28% over the next 15 years. The EPA has proposed long overdue Clean Water Act standards to limit the amount of toxic metals and other c hemicals that can be dumped in our water. Unfortunately the coal industry is already trying to block them. Tell EPA to require power plants to clean up all of their pollution, not just some of it! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Concord Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5462 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Respons e: No Comment Excerpt: EPA action is needed to prevent power plant wastewater from harming the environment. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: T. Black Commenter Affiliation: Private Citi zen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5463 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 917 New standards need to be implemented to prevent further pollutio n from power plants. The effects of the chemicals that are dumped are far reaching and costly to all of our health and welfare. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. OConnor Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5464 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In 1948, the governments of the world came together to affirm that "Everyone has the right to clean and accessible water, adequate for the health and well - being of the individual and family, and no one shall be deprived of such access or quality of water due to individual economic circumstance ." Then in 2010, we strengthened the commitment by stating "it is now time to consider access to safe drinking water and sanitation as a human right, defined as the right to equal and non discriminatory access to a sufficient amount of safe drinking water for personal and domestic uses - drinking, personal sanitation, washing of clothes, food preparation and personal and household hygiene - to sustain life and health. States should prioritize these personal and domestic uses over other water uses and should tak e steps to ensure that this sufficient amount is of good quality, affordable for all and can be collected within a reasonable distance from a person's home." (emphasis mine) In support of this most worthy goal, I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to p rotect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant wastewater with the cost being borne by polluters (so as to remain "affordable for all"). It is the only reasonable and considered action to address this most basic of human rights. Comment Respon se: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: M. Harthorn Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5466 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 918 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: You’d think with all the modern technology and intelligent people in the world that we could find a way to dispose of waste in a non - harmful way to the environment, But i t appears that big corporations only care about themselves and want to use the cheapest and easy way out to dispose of their filth. It’s disgusts me to know that they are slowly killing off creatures and animals, this needs to come to a stop. Comment Respo nse: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. F. Schlegel Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5467 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No Externa l Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to raise standards to protect our drinking water sources and the Great Lakes. Specifically, I support limiting power plant pollution through revision of the effluent limitations guidelines and standards for steam electric power plants under proposed rule for 40 CFR Part 423. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: N. Berkley Commenter Affiliation: Private Ci tizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5468 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We need to eliminate the people that are running our way of li fe. For the animals as well as the people are suffering. They are just looking to line their pockets. They are not looking at the big picture.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 919 Our opinion does matter for something. They are not listening to the little people that are suffering in silence, but not anymore. I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, streams and great Lakes from toxic power plant wastewater. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Chateau Com menter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5470 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We are in world of ever - improvi ng technology, I understand that there are now better ways to protect ourselves from the harmful pollution of power plants. I understand that it is expensive to implement these changes, but if we don't then we'll pay an even greater price. Please use your influence to convince people that we need to protect ourselves from the toxic waste spewing from our fdctories. if we all do our part to safeguard fresh air and fresh water we can make this a safer and happier place for generations to come, Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: A. H. Holmes Commenter Affiliation: Kiwanis Club of Dearborn Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5472 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Re view Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to strengthen the rules used to protect all the rivers streams and lakes in the Unite d States from unnecessary pollution caused by power plants, mining and the burning of fossil feels. Protecting our environment for future generations is far more important than short term profits for uncaring corporations.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 920 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Haley - Stark Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5473 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: We ha ve not updated the standards to ensure our drinking water and lakes, streams and bays since 1982. This is long overdue and I urge the EPA to address this now. We must stop any pollutants that are being allowed to contaminate our environment, especially fro m power plants. Any industry that endangers clean water for our future generations must be addressed and restricted accordingly. We must address this now before it is too late. It will be harder to rectify the problem once it is beyond safe rather than to try to prevent it now. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. C. Carley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5474 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As the mother of five children, I am very concerned about the quality of our drinking water. Please do not allow power plants to poison our future generations by contaminating our drinking water and the fish we eat. Protect our rivers and streams and the animals living there from these toxins. We are counting on you to protect our environment and our children! Comment Response: See response to DCN E PA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Tinsley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5475 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 921 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorp orated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is a fact that power plant wastewater has been polluting our rivers, lakes, and streams for years. The EPA was created to monitor such disregard of this country's natural resources. Comment Response: See resp onse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Handley Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5476 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Our lives depend on clean drinking water. It is time to stop the water polluters . . .please see that the power plant pollution standards are passed and enforced . Texas is depending on you . Thank y ou for the courage it takes to pass this. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Longoria Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5477 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: As someone with a small child, I would urge the EPA to do more to limit power plant pollution into our water. This is a continuin g concern to those of us that feel our voices are not being heard over the stronghold of special interest groups. My son would appreciate your attention to this matter. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 922 Commenter Name: R. W.Becker Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5478 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It would be prudent of the EPA to adopt waste water discharge standards for power plants. The fact that scrubbers can be rinsed with discharged water into our water systems may improve air quality, but transfers those pollutants to our water supply. Don't let them do it. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Chesbro Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5479 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please protect our water and finalize strong regulations to prevent toxic materials from entering our lakes streams and rivers. Put the health of you r constituents and wildlife ahead of corporate profits. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Hopkins Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 54 80 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: If the power plants used the technology that we have today they wouldn’t pour that waste into our waters. With the w aste our environment starts to die. Plants wither away, animal populations seem to disappear and even our species can become ill. Why poison our planet and each other with arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium? I would like to be able to drink water, eat fis h, and swim safely.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 923 I want to see the power plants of this age grow with the technology and not to continue killing our planet. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: David (surname illegible) C ommenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5481 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I want to urge the EPA to fin alize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. I have lived in New Jersey my whole life and have seen first hand the effects that these pollutants bring. Please act responsibly. Comment Response: See respo nse to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Nobleman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5482 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Please, please EPA finalize a rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power plant waste water. Ugh! Ugh! Why aren’t power plants using the best available technology to reduce this po llution? Billions of pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium are dumped into our (ie., your) water. Why? Strong standards to limit ALL water pollutions will make our precious water clean and the fish we eat delicious and pure! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 924 Commenter Name: J. Hoopengarder Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5483 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: This issue is dear to my heart since my nephew contracted cancer because of CIBA power plant polluting the waters of Toms River. Something needs to be done with these power plants polluting the waters. They should be made to clean up all of their waste. No t just some of it. Too many children are getting sick from the pollution from these power plants being careless and not being forced to clean up their mess. The standards need to be updated and be more strict against these power plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: (name illegible) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5484 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I encourage the EPA to create a concrete institution where people in our country feel secure in drinking our water, while also feeling no guilt for the earth. This can be achieved by our power plants, and other ecological using companies to use the best technology to reduce toxic chemicals from polluting our water and air. Your the voice of the people who cannot speak for itself. Promote the cleanest and smart technologies to keep our earth a safe place to breathe and live. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: R. Sleater Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5485 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 925 Comment Excerpt: On both state and national platforms, power plants should be required to use the best available technology to reduce as much water pollution as possible. The public trust is at stake. The conservative posture is to conserve the purity of our water resources. Very expensive to restore. Cost effective to clean their discharge of recoverable toxins in the form of billion of p ounds of arsenic, lead, mercury, and selenium into surface water. Michigan needs strong standards to limit all power plant air and water pollution. These stricter standards will improve the health of our rivers and lakes. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Z. Friedman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5487 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Current wastewater discharge guidelines need to be updated and must require strong standards for limiting the amount of toxic heavy metals that can be discharged into surface water. Mandatory testing and r egulatory standards must be met and enforced. Typically commercial businesses are the more prominent polluters. Dumping toxic waste water into active streams and lakes is repugnant and immoral. It is of the utmost importance to protect our surface water fr om toxin’s that cause detrimental illness to humans, destroy the natural ecosystem and destroy the ability to use these waters for recreation. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: P. Beckert C ommenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5491 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 926 I am writing you as a citizen of Central Texas concerned by the never ending, overbuilding and over expansion of the Austin and greater Austin Area by freeways and over ambitious home constriction that has encroached, already, over the very fragile Edwards Aquafier. It is time to acce ss the usage of power plants that help created this mess. Power has never been cheap. So, what is the cost of being redundant? Right now, over 23,000 miles of streams and rivers are already polluted, contaminated with Power Plant Wastewater. And, without s trict limits, EPA predicts that the amount of toxins discharged by these plants is going to increase by 28% over the next 15 years. Why would any of us choose to develop children with lower IQ’s, give our neighbors more cancer or contribute to the decline of our own health, as individuals, by pretending to be content with everything “just as it is”? Please send my hope to the EPA and stand behind their efforts to keep our drinking water clean, our fish swimming and hold the Power Plants “in check” by findin g forward thinking ideas to reduce wastewater and our dependance on coal. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: (name illegible) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5492 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Clean water is the defining resource needing protection by government at this time. The EPA has a change to choose a strong position of protection for our public resources. Prevention is much cheaper than clean - up. Please vote to enforce the strongest rules possible for our water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, E xcerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Blake Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5493 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 927 Comment Excerpt: This letter is to express my deep concern for improving air and water quality in Colorado. To that end, I implort that EPA create, maintain, and uphold strong standards to protect our water resources from toxins emitted from power plants . Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Levy Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5494 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I support the most protective option available for EPA cool plant water pollution standards. Water is a limited resource and it is imperative that we protect it to the fulle st extent in the dry west. The best available technology should be used. Discharge guidelines need to be stronger and updated, limiting the amount of heavy metals allowed to be discharged. When it come to the public health, the most protective option is th e only option. When setting these standards, we should set them as if we were setting them for family members and loved ones. If it was your child or mother impacted, how would you set them? Yes, there are costs, but let’s share them and protect each othe r. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. H. Garby Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5496 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Fla g: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am very concerned about pollutants in our lakes, rivers, and streams. I believe that current wastewater guidelines should be updated to require strong standards for l imiting the amount of toxic heavy metals that can be discharged into surface water. We need to reduce or risk of exposure to toxic heavy metals in our drinking water. I support the most protective option available to update the current wastewater guideline s.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 928 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Muller Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5497 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am writing to express my support of the EPA’s proposed rule to update discharge guidelines and standards. The best solutions to keeping our drinking water and surface w aters free of toxic heavy metals should be solved with tight regulations calling for sound use of modern, sustainable technologies. Coal - fired power plants being a major source of toxic heavy metals in our streams, rivers, and lakes, need to be regulated t o reduce the impacts of their ash and should be dis commissioned/converted to natural gas or alternative energy plants. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Dorsey Commenter Affiliation: P rivate Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5498 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Current wastewater discharge guidelines need to be up dated. We need stronger guidelines. The majority of our drinking water comes from surface water, and updating these standards will reduce our risk of exposure to toxic heavy metals. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt N umber 1. Commenter Name: R. Irons Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5499 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: NoEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 929 Comment Excerpt: I am writing to express my concerns about the heavy metals that are being discharged into surface water from our coal - fired power plants, which contribute to more than 5 percent of toxic pollution to our lakes, rivers, and streams. In Colorado, most of our drinking water comes from surface water and we need the best technology available, along with higher standards of wastewater discharge guidelines to ensure that we are not being exposed to toxic heavy metals. As U.S. citizens, it is our right t o have access to clean drinking water without having to worry about the detrimental effects it could be having on our health. I urge you to consider upgrading the regulations in place to ensure the health of this community. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: J. Walsh Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5500 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am concerned with the pollution caused by coal - fired power plants and the contamination it is causing to our lakes, rivers and streams. It is important to review and update the current standards regarding the level of toxic metals discharged into our waters. The current standards are toxic to our environment and is endangering our drinking water along with all living things residing in the waters. We must use the best technology and most protective option to ensure future generations clean drinking water. This proposed rule will move as forward to cleaner, non - toxic water. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Echchawk Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5502 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt:Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 930 Scientific proof has made it clear we cannot separa te the connection of water, air and land to our human health. Dumping toxins into our water has damaged our environment many times beyond repair. Self interest and shortsighted efforts of Colorado industries damages our future and future generations to com e. If we don't stopdumping toxins we will not be able to restore balance, health, and sustainability to Colorado's natural resources. Please stop the pollution while we still have a choice. There are now waters that are beyond saving -- it's just too late for large portions of Colorado's natural resources! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: G. Dowd Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5504 - A1 C omment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: These rivers, lakes, and streams are not there for power plants to hide and dilute the pollution and sludge they give off. I grew up swimming in these rivers. Baptized in these lakes and cooled off on a hot day by these streams. Not only is clean water essential for maintaining a healthy lifestyle for me, I’d like my kids to swim in those lakes one day without worrying what ex actly their fragile bodies and immune systems are being exposed to. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: C. McAndrews Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - O W - 2009 - 0819 - 5506 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our rivers, lakes and streams from toxic power pla nt waste water. As a medical professional, I am aware of the impact that chemicals such as lead, mercury and arsenic can have on our health. Power plants should be required to use the best technology to reduce pollution as possible.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 931 Do you want to eat “Fra nkenfish”? I don’t! Do you want to lower the IQ of children by having them drink dirty water? I don’t! Strong standards are required to limit power plant pollution to improve not only the health of the rivers and streams, but our own health. Comment Respon se: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: E. Mihalek Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5507 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Rev iew External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: It is your job to protect us from the unlawful practices of power plants dumping toxic waste. Please do your job. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. W. Bodnovich Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5508 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Co mment Excerpt: From all the literature that I have read, it is quite obvious that power plants are responsible for significant amounts of pollution in the environment. I and my family are begging you, the EPA to adopt strong rules in order to protect the water we drink and the fish we consume. Anyone responsible for polluting our environment should be required to use the best technology to reduce such pollution. Please help end this abuse and provide all of us with clean rivers and healthy drinking water.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 932 Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Creal Commenter Affiliation: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5510 - A2 Comment Excerpt Number : 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: First, Michigan endorses the USEPA’s efforts in revising existing ELGs and setting national numeric technology - based effluent limitations. The Steam Electric Category has undergone considerable changes since the ELGs were last revised in 1982. The proposed rules identify four preferred alternatives that include a number of new requirements for wastewaters associated with existing facilities. Whil e Michigan endorses the establishment of the proposed standards for most of the evaluated wastewaters, we have concerns whether there is a sufficient basis to warrant the standards established for two of the wastewater categories. Overall, Michigan strongl y supports the USEPA’s work in reevaluating existing ELGs instead of focusing solely on new industries. Like the Steam Electric Category, there are a number of industries that have seen significant improvements in treatment technology and changes in wastew ater characterization since their ELGs were promulgated in the 1970s and 1980s. State water programs lack the personnel and resources to effectively research and develop proper Best Professional Judgment (BPJ) standards; relying on those state - specific BP J standards for significant industrial categories can create inconsistencies between states and across regions. Implementing the proposed rules will set Best Available Technology Economically Achievable (BAT) standards and revise the existing ELGs that hav e not adequately addressed process changes in the industry over the last 30 years. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Creal Commenter Affiliation: Michigan Department of Environmental Qu ality Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5510 - A2 Comment Excerpt Number: 2 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: The proposed rules include four preferred alternatives for reg ulating existing discharges. For most of the wastestreams, these four alternatives propose uniform requirements. In general, if the USEPA’s analysis of the wastestreams and treatment technologies clearly supports theEffluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 933 establishment of a particular standar d, Michigan advocates setting the standard in rule. In reviewing the uniform requirements of the rules, it appears that the establishment of dry handling standards for both fly ash residuals and flue gas mercury controls and numeric limits for both the ga sification process and nonchemical metal cleaning wastewaters are clearly warranted. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: W. Creal Commenter Affiliation: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5510 - A2 Comment Excerpt Number: 7 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Michigan appreciates the USEPA’s efforts in reevaluating the ELGs for the Steam Electric Category. The recent changes in processes and the development of new technologies are clearly not adequately addressed by the existing regulations. Once the USEPA implements the proposed rules, the revised ELGs will strengthen the controls on these wastestreams by establishing BAT standards that will preclude individual states from each having to establish BPJ standards. If the USEPA’s analysis supports the establishment of a particular treatment technology as BAT, then Michig an supports its inclusion in the final rule. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: K. Staedter Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5511 - A1 Comm ent Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I believe that current wastewater discharge guidelines should be updated & made more stringent, especially to further limit th e amount of toxic heavy metals that can be discharged into surface water. Now is the time to ensure that the proposed rules specify that the best available technology & the most protective options are used to ensure the health & safety for generations to c ome. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 934 Commenter Name: J. Vreeland Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5512 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I’ve lived in Flint Michigan 76 years, we must protect our water, lakes, rivers etc. from the pollution being dumped in them. Please help Mich get and keep our water clean and safe. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: D. Yanusz Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5514 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 Externa l Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I am strongly concerned with the condition and quality of our natural resources such as rivers, lakes and streams. In this day and age of technology, refine ries and power plants should be held to the highest standard to make sure all that can possibly be done is in fact done for the well being of the communities and neighborhoods in which they reside. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Maldonado Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5515 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Resp onse: No Comment Excerpt: Finalize a regulation to prohibit coal fired power plants from dumping their waste water into NJ’s lakes, rivers and streams. In the US, 80% of coal plants have NO limits on the amount of toxic metals and water pollutants they c an dump into our water.Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 935 5.5 billion pounds of water pollutants are dumped per year. This is a SHAME. Shame on the greedy power plants for choosing to save money at the expense of human lives and health (not to mention the ecological effects EPA). EPA, prot ect the environment from toxic coal ash! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: B. Rose Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5516 - A1 Comment Exce rpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I therefore urge the EPA to finalize a strong rule to protect our water. There is available technology to reduce wastewater dumping

– let’s implement this technology! I think we all want safer water for drinking and fishing, and overall health of rivers and lakes

– let’s move forward with stricter standards to make this happen! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2 265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Sherry (last name illegible) Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5518 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorpor ated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I want our lakes, rivers and streams to be free from toxic powder plant wastewater. I’m very upset about these plants dumping these harmful pounds of arsenic, lead, mercury etc. It must stop or our children will suffer. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: S. Cappleman Commenter Affiliation: Private Citizen Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5520 - A1 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 936 External Revi ew Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: I call for the EPA to set strong standards and regulations that require power plants to use the latest and most effective technologies to keep the toxins they pro duce from polluting the rivers, lakes and oceans in and around our country. We need action now to insure that our planet is safe for future generations. Water is a precious resource that is required for almost all life on our planet. it is our duty to prot ect this precious resource! Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: David Y. Chung Commenter Affiliation: Homer City Generation, L.P Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5552 - A2 Comment Excerpt Number: 1 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: Homer City acknowledges the need for EPA to update the existing ELGs in light of technological advances and supports EPA’s goal o f protecting the environment and public health. Nonetheless, certain of the proposed revisions are flawed, as discussed below. Compliance with those proposed revisions will require burdensome changes that will not result in commensurate benefits to water q uality. Comment Response: EPA disagrees that some of the proposed revisions of the steam electric ELG are flawed. EPA also disagrees that compliance “will require burdensome changes that will not result in commensurate benefits to water quality.” EPA ha s determined that the pollution control requirements in the final rule are technologically available and economically achievable. See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1. Commenter Name: Thomas W. Easterly Commenter Affiliation: Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) Document Control Number: EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 5553 - A2 Comment Excerpt Number: 1Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Sour ce Category:

EPA’s Response to Public Comments

2 - 937 External Review Flag: No External Review External Review Incorporated into Response: No Comment Excerpt: In general, w e favor updating the Steam Electric ELGs to account for technology improvements in the steam electric power industry. It has been over 30 years since the last ELG was established, therefore we believe it is important to address changes in wastewater compos ition from the widespread installation of air pollution emission controls. Comment Response: See response to DCN EPA - HQ - OW - 2009 - 0819 - 2265, Excerpt Number 1.