alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[110th Congress Public Law 43]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ043.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 237]]

Public Law 110-43
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   127 East Locust Street in Fairbury, Illinois, as the ``Dr. Francis 
  Townsend Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 3, 2007 -  [S. 1352]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DR. FRANCIS TOWNSEND POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 127 East Locust Street in Fairbury, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Dr. Francis Townsend Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Francis 
Townsend Post Office Building''.

    Approved July 3, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1352:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            May 23, considered and passed Senate.
            June 18, 19, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Joint servicechemical and biological defense program [electronic resource]**
 
SuDoc:D 1.117:
ItemNumber:0306-A-45(online)
CGPsystem Number:000603941
 
2000-2001
2000-2002
2002-2003
2006-2007
2008-2009
```

EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eldorado Artesian Springs,  Inc.
     (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
     with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
     "Report") I, Cathleen  Shoenfeld,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,
     certify, pursuant to 18 USC SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Cathleen Shoenfeld
----------------------
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 16, 2004
```
DATE:1-3D-15

CHRISTOPHER A. PINE,CLERK 14TH COURT OF APPEALS 301 FANNIN St., Rm:245 HOUSTON,TX 77002 LEON HARRISON #815719 POLUNSKY UNIT 3872 FM 350 So. LIVINGSTON, TX 77351



### RE: LEON HARRISON V. STATE, No .14-13-00239-CR; TC:N 230TH DISTRICT COURT HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 2TT—E0URT #

Dear Mr.Pine: 

### Iuouldlike the status ofmy motion dated:11/17/14 for "Appellant's Request Court En Banc To Reconsider Court's Denial Of Appellant's Motion under Rule 60(b)(5). At this time I have not received a white card on the out come of this 

### motion or it's filing date. Please sendme adocket text of the filing in this action. Thank you for your time. 

### Sincerely, . / Appellant-pro se

CC: FILE
```

Exhibit 99.2

                             CERTIFICATION OF 10QSB

I,  Cathleen  Shoenfeld of Eldorado  Artesian  Springs,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
     ended   September  30,  2002  (the   "Report")   fully  complies  with  the
     requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                          /s/ Cathleen Shoenfeld
Dated: November 14, 2002
```
# Jurnalul Oficial C 402I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 402I |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 645 octombrie 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 402I

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 645 octombrie 2021

---

| Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informări |
| | INFORMĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE |
| | Curtea de Conturi |
| 2021/C 402 I/01 | Avizul nr. 2/2021 referitor la propunerea Comisiei de regulament al Consiliului de modificare a Regulamentului (UE, Euratom) nr. 609/2014 pentru a spori previzibilitatea pentru statele membre și pentru a clarifica procedurile de soluționare a litigiilor legate de punerea la dispoziție a resurselor proprii tradiționale și a resurselor proprii bazate pe TVA și pe VNB [COM(2021) 327 final din 25 iunie 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE)] | 1 |

Cuprins

Pagina

IV   Informări

INFORMĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE

Curtea de Conturi

2021/C 402 I/01

Avizul nr. 2/2021 referitor la propunerea Comisiei de regulament al Consiliului de modificare a Regulamentului (UE, Euratom) nr. 609/2014 pentru a spori previzibilitatea pentru statele membre și pentru a clarifica procedurile de soluționare a litigiilor legate de punerea la dispoziție a resurselor proprii tradiționale și a resurselor proprii bazate pe TVA și pe VNB [COM(2021) 327 final din 25 iunie 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE)]

1

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

IV Informări

INFORMĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE

Curtea de Conturi

| 5.10.2021 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | CI 402/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2021

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

CI 402/1

---

Avizul nr. 2/2021

referitor la propunerea Comisiei de regulament al Consiliului de modificare a Regulamentului (UE, Euratom) nr. 609/2014 pentru a spori previzibilitatea pentru statele membre și pentru a clarifica procedurile de soluționare a litigiilor legate de punerea la dispoziție a resurselor proprii tradiționale și a resurselor proprii bazate pe TVA și pe VNB [COM(2021) 327 final din 25 iunie 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE)]

(2021/C 402 I/01)

Curtea de Conturi Europeană vă informează cu privire la publicarea, în data de 5 octombrie 2021, a Avizului nr. 2/2021 referitor la propunerea Comisiei de regulament al Consiliului de modificare a Regulamentului (UE, Euratom) nr. 609/2014 pentru a spori previzibilitatea pentru statele membre și pentru a clarifica procedurile de soluționare a litigiilor legate de punerea la dispoziție a resurselor proprii tradiționale și a resurselor proprii bazate pe TVA și pe VNB [COM(2021) 327 final din 25 iunie 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE)].

Avizul poate fi consultat sau descărcat de pe site-ul Curții de Conturi Europene începând cu data de 5 octombrie 2021, ora 17:00:

https://www.eca.europa.eu/ro/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=59435

---
# C_2016357EN.01003202.xml

| 29.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/32

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

of 20 March 2015

in Case E-19/13

Konkurrenten.no AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority

(Action for annulment of a decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority — State aid — Local bus transport services — Decision not to open the formal investigation procedure — Decision following the formal investigation procedure — Admissibility — Measures of organization of procedure)

(2016/C 357/13)

In Case E-19/13: Konkurrenten.no AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority — Application for annulment of EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 519/12/COL of 19 December 2012, closing a formal investigation concerning aid granted by Oslo Municipality to AS Oslo Sporveier, and of EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 181/13/COL of 8 May 2013, refusing to open a formal investigation into aid measures not covered by Decision No 519/12/COL, the Court, composed of: Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Per Christiansen and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave order of 20 March 2015, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The application is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | Konkurrenten.no AS is to bear its own costs and the costs incurred by the EFTA Surveillance Authority; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Konkurrenten.no AS is to bear its own costs and the costs incurred by the EFTA Surveillance Authority;

| 3. | Sporveien Oslo AS is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Sporveien Oslo AS is to bear its own costs.

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 27

To amend the United States Housing Act of 1937 to exempt small public 

housing agencies from the requirement of preparing an annual public 

housing agency plan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. BEREUTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To amend the United States Housing Act of 1937 to exempt 

small public housing agencies from the requirement of 

preparing an annual public housing agency plan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Public Housing 

5 Authority Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY PLANS FOR SMALL PUB7 LIC HOUSING AGENCIES. 

8 Section 5A of the United States Housing Act of 1937 

9 (42 U.S.C. 1437c–1) is amended—
2

•HR 27 IH 

1 (1) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the 

2 following new paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(3) EXEMPTION FOR SMALL PHAS.—

4 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding para5 graph (1) or any other provision of this Act—

6 ‘‘(i) the requirement under paragraph 

7 (1) shall not apply to any small public 

8 housing agency; and 

9 ‘‘(ii) any reference in this section or 

10 any other provision of law to a ‘public 

11 housing agency’ shall not be considered to 

12 refer to any small public housing agency, 

13 to the extent such reference applies to the 

14 requirement to submit a public housing 

15 agency plan under subsection (b). 

16 ‘‘(B) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this 

17 paragraph, the term ‘small public housing agen18 cy’ means a public housing agency that—

19 ‘‘(i) administers 100 or less public 

20 housing dwelling units; and 

21 ‘‘(ii) is not designated pursuant to 

22 section 6(j)(2) as a troubled public housing 

23 agency.’’; and 

24 (2) in subsection (k)—
3

•HR 27 IH 

1 (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting 

2 ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon; 

3 (B) by striking subparagraph (B); and 

4 (C) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) 

5 and (C) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively, 

6 and by realigning such paragraphs (as so redes7 ignated) so as to be indented 2 ems from the 

8 left margin.

Æ
It doesn’t have to be that way

Alcohol and Drug Abuse Hurts

Everyone in the Family... 

For more information, call 

 SAMHSA’s National Helpline

1-800-662-HELP

www.findtreatment.samhsa.gov

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

www.samhsa.gov
FORM 10-Q--QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the period ended 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2002

or

[ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from __________ to _______________

Commission File Number: 33-5785-A

NASHVILLE LAND FUND, LTD.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
#### TOWN OF EUTAW V. HARRIS.

(Decided June 17, 1913.)

Appeal from Greene Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Bernard Harwood.

McKinley, McQueen, Hawkins & Snow, for appellant. Evins & Jack, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 10.15

                                  FEE AGREEMENT
This FEE AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") made as of April 23, 2001 is by and
between GourmetMarket.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with its principal
place of business at 7000 W. Palmetto Park Road, Suite 501, Boca Raton, Florida
33433, and Jonathan Shepard, with his principal place of business at 5355 Town
Center Road, Suite 801, Boca Raton, Florida 33486, ("Shepard").

                                R E C I T A L S:
                                - - - - - - - -

The Company is a public company with a class of equity securities publicly
traded, and Shepard, as general counsel, has provided certain corporate legal
services in the past.

The Company has not had sufficient funds to pay Shepard in cash for services
provided and desires to issue shares of common stock as payment for such
services in accordance with the terms and conditions contained hereinafter.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the
parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

         1.       LEGAL SERVICES. Shepard has provided corporate legal services
                  over the two years to the Company and affiliated companies and
                  has not had been paid in full for such services.

         2.       COMPENSATION. In consideration for the performance of services
                  by Shepard, the Company hereby agrees to issue Shepard an
                  aggregate of 800,000 shares of the Company's common stock as
                  full payment for legal services provided to the Company and
                  affiliated companies through May 31, 2001. If additional
                  services are provided, after such date, the Company and
                  Shepard shall negotiate the compensation for such services,
                  which may be cash, stock or a combination thereof.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written.


SHEPARD:                                          COMPANY:


 /s/ Jonathan Shepard                             By: /s/ C. Lawrence Rutstein
 ----------------------------------------              ------------------------
 Jonathan Shepard                                 C. Lawrence Rutstein, Chairman
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 23, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01014-CV 

ADA RENEE LAWRENCE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ADA RENEE 

LAWRENCE, AS NEXT FRIEND OF M.W., A MINOR, C.C., A MINOR, 

J.C., A MINOR AND Z.C., A MINOR, Appellants 

V. 

STEWART CREEK VILLAS LP, CAPSTONE REAL ESTATE SERVICES, 

INC., RESTOPROS, INC., SONGHAI DEVELOPEMENT COMPANY, 

L.L.C. AND CHERNO NJIE, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 199-04308-2016 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Schenck, Smith, and Garcia 

Opinion by Justice Smith 

We reinstate this appeal. Before the Court is the parties’ August 11, 2022 

agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 

191014F.P05 

 

/Craig Smith/

CRAIG SMITH 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

ADA RENEE LAWRENCE, 

INDIVIDUALLY, AND ADA 

RENEE LAWRENCE, AS NEXT 

FRIEND OF M.W., A MINOR, C.C., 

A MINOR, J.C., A MINOR AND 

Z.C., A MINOR, Appellants 

No. 05-19-01014-CV V. 

STEWART CREEK VILLAS LP, 

CAPSTONE REAL ESTATE 

SERVICES, INC., RESTOPROS, 

INC., SONGHAI 

DEVELOPEMENT COMPANY, 

L.L.C. AND CHERNO NJIE, 

Appellees 

 On Appeal from the 199th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 199-04308-

2016. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. 

Justices Schenck and Garcia 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that each party bear their own costs of this appeal. 

Judgment entered this 23rd day of August 2022.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE TRANSFER INHERITANCE TAXES IN THE ESTATE OF ELIZABETH RODMAN VOORHEES, DECEASED. UNION COUNTY TRUST COMPANY, SUCCESSOR EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ELIZABETH RODMAN VOORHEES, DECEASED, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. J. H. THAYER MARTIN, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Submitted October 27, 1939

Decided January 25, 1940.

For the prosecutor-appellant, *Whittemore & McLean*and *Sigurd A. Emerson.*

For the defendant-respondent, *David T. Wilentz*and *William A. Moore.*

For New Jersey College for Women, *Russell E. Watson.*

Pee Cueiam.

The appeal in this case is from an affirmance in the Supreme Court of a decree of Vice-Ordinary Buchanan affirming a transfer tax assessment, *In re Voorhees,*123 *N. J. Eq.*142. After a careful examination of the record and the briefs of counsel, we conclude that the determinations of the learned vice-ordinary as applied to the facts in this case are in accordance with the law of this state.

The judgment under review will be affirmed.

*For affirmance*—The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 10.

*For reversal*—None.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT  10.1.1

                      AMENDMENT 1 TO THE TRANSFER AGREEMENT
                        BETWEEN UCAR CARBON COMPANY INC.
                            AND UCAR GRAPH-TECH INC.

The Transfer Agreement is hereby amended, in accordance with the following.

1. The second paragraph of Section 4.1 of Article 4 is hereby amended to read in
   its entirety as follows:

             "Transferee and its participating subsidiaries hereby agree to be,
   and from and after the Closing shall continue to be, (i) jointly and
   severally liable with Transferor and its other participating subsidiaries and
   affiliates for all benefits owed to participants under the Program and the
   Plan and (2) except as otherwise expressly provided in the Services
   Agreement, solely liable and responsible for all benefits owed to its
   employees and retirees, and their beneficiaries, under such plans. The
   parties agree that all employees of Transferor who retired from the Business
   after February 25, 1991 (approximately 20 employees), and employees of
   Transferee and its subsidiaries (including the Employees) who retire after
   the Closing, shall be considered retirees of Transferee for all purposes
   (including, but not limited to, funding obligations and administration of
   benefits) under the Program, the Plan and such plans."

Date: July 14, 2000
#### John W. Aitken et al., Appellants, *v.*Simon E. Bernheimer et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, tenth district, borough of Manhattan.

J. Lehmann, for appellants.

A. P. Fitch, for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

This judgment must be reversed. The presence of the defendants’ name on the wagon that caused the injury to the plaintiffs was *prima facie*evidence that it was owned by the defendants and was in their service, at the time of the accident.

*746The evidence shows that the accident happened through the negligence of the defendants and without any negligence on the part of the plaintiffs.

Present: Trttax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.
#### Michael Brady, Respondent, *v.*The Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new'trial.

Henry A. Bobinson (John T. Little, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Logan, Demond & Harby (M. E. Harby and Arthur Wopp, of counsel), for respondent.

*794Schuchman, J.

The only point urged by appellant to effect a reversal of the judgment is, that the court erred in charging “ That if, while the passenger is getting off the car, the jury find that the car is started suddenly so as to produce a jerking motion, it is in itself an act of carelessness and negligence.”

This was not error. Bennett v. Third Ave. R. R. *Co.,*40 App. Div. 626; Roberts v. Johnson, 58 N. Y. 613; Schalscha v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 19 Misc. Rep. 141.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

McCarthy, J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
# C_2021103EN.01000801.xml

| 25.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/8

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 103/07)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 15 December 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85961 |
| Decision No | 162/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Region | Whole territory of Norway |
| Legal basis | Parliamentary resolution (‘Stortingsvedtak’) on an amendment to the National Budget 2020: ‘Prop. 1 S Tillegg 1 (2020-2021) Endring av Prop. 1 S (2020-2021) Statsbudsjettet 2021’ (yet to be adopted), based on ‘Innst. 8 S (2020-2021)’ (yet to be adopted) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Ensure a functioning trade credit insurance market in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic |
| Form of aid | Guarantees |
| Budget | NOK 18 200 million in guarantees |
| Duration | Until 30 June 2021 |
| Economic sectors | Trade credit insurance |
| Name and address of the granting authority | GIEK |
| Postboks 1763 Vika |
| N-0122 |
| Oslo |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

15 December 2020

Case No

85961

Decision No

162/20/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Region

Whole territory of Norway

Legal basis

Parliamentary resolution (‘Stortingsvedtak’) on an amendment to the National Budget 2020: ‘Prop. 1 S Tillegg 1 (2020-2021) Endring av Prop. 1 S (2020-2021) Statsbudsjettet 2021’ (yet to be adopted), based on ‘Innst. 8 S (2020-2021)’ (yet to be adopted)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Ensure a functioning trade credit insurance market in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic

Form of aid

Guarantees

Budget

NOK 18 200 million in guarantees

Duration

Until 30 June 2021

Economic sectors

Trade credit insurance

Name and address of the granting authority

GIEK

Postboks 1763 Vika

N-0122

Oslo

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---