alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### KAHN & FELDMAN, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. UNITED PIECE DYE WORKS, APPELLANT.

Argued October 19, 1939

Decided April 18, 1940.

For the appellant, *Eugene F. Frey.*

For the respondents, Evans, *Smith & Evans*and *Davies & Davies.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*—Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Hague, JJ. 8.

*For reversal—Heher,*Perskie, Rafferty, JJ. 3.
§ 303.244 Golden parachute and severance plan payments. ( a ) *Scope.* Pursuant to section 18(k) of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1828(k)) and part 359 of this chapter, an insured depository institution or depository institution holding company may not make golden parachute payments or excess nondiscriminatory severance plan payments unless the depository institution or holding company obtains permission to make such payments in accordance with the rules contained in part 359 of this chapter. This section contains the procedures to file for the FDIC's consent when such consent is necessary under part 359 of this chapter. ( 1 ) *Golden parachute payments.* A troubled insured depository institution or a troubled depository institution holding company is prohibited from making golden parachute payments (as defined in § 359.1(f)(1) of this chapter) unless it obtains the consent of the appropriate federal banking agency and the written concurrence of the FDIC. Therefore, in the case of golden parachute payments, the procedures in this section apply to all troubled insured depository institutions and troubled depository institution holding companies.
( 2 ) *Excess nondiscriminatory severance plan payments.* In the case of excess nondiscriminatory severance plan payments as provided by § 359.1(f)(2)(v) of this chapter, the FDIC's consent is necessary for state nonmember banks that meet the criteria set forth in § 359.1(f)(1)(ii) of this chapter. In addition, the FDIC's consent is required for all insured depository institutions or depository institution holding companies that meet the same criteria and seek to make payments in excess of the 12-month amount specified in § 359.1(f)(2)(v).
( b ) *Where to file.* Applicants shall submit a letter application to the appropriate FDIC regional director.
( c ) *Content of filing.* The application shall contain the following: ( 1 ) The reasons why the applicant seeks to make the payment;
( 2 ) An identification of the institution-affiliated party who will receive the payment;
( 3 ) A copy of any contract or agreement regarding the subject matter of the filing;
( 4 ) The cost of the proposed payment and its impact on the institution's capital and earnings;
( 5 ) The reasons why the consent to the payment should be granted; and
( 6 ) Certification and documentation as to each of the points cited in § 359.4(a)(4).
( d ) *Additional information.* The FDIC may request additional information at any time during processing of the filing.
( e ) *Processing.* The FDIC will provide the applicant with a subsequent written notification of the final action taken as soon as the decision is rendered.
[67 FR 79247, Dec. 27, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 50461, Aug. 21, 2003]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,538
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,629
<PP&E>                                           7,348
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,964
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,022
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,275)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,850
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,916
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,402)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,423
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,825)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.92)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.12

                       Amendment to Employment Agreement

Reference is hereby made to the Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
January 5, 1998 by and between Perry A. Sook, an individual resident of Texas,
and Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc. (formerly known as Nexstar Group, Inc.), a
Delaware corporation (the "Agreement").  The Agreement is amended as follows:

Paragraph 2, Term:  The term of the Agreement is hereby extended through
December 31, 2004 (unless earlier terminated as provided in the Agreement).

Paragraph 4(a), Compensation/Salary:  During the extended term of the Agreement,
Sook shall be entitled to receive an annual Base Salary (as defined in the
Agreement) at the rate specified below:

                                 Period                          Base Salary
                                 ------                          -----------

From July 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001                        $150,000
From January 1,2002 through December 31, 2002                      $400,000
From January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003                     $415,000
After January 1, 2004                                              $430,000

Paragraph 4(b), Compensation/Bonus:  The following maximum Bonus amounts will be
added to the table set forth in Paragraph 4(b) of the Agreement:

After the 2001 fiscal year                                         $ 75,000
After the 2002 fiscal year                                         $100,000
After the 2003 fiscal year                                         $103,750
After the 2004 fiscal year and each subsequent fiscal year         $107,500


All other terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.

Agreed, as of May 10, 2001.





                                         /s/ Perry A. Sook
                                         ------------------------------
                                         Perry A. Sook


                                         NEXSTAR BROADCASTING
                                         GROUP, INC.

                                             /s/ Jay M. Grossman
                                         By:___________________________

                                             Vice President
                                         Its:__________________________
§ 303.142 Processing. ( a ) *Expedited processing.* A notice filed by an insured state savings association seeking to commence or continue an activity under § 362.11(b)(2)(ii) of this chapter will be acknowledged in writing by the FDIC and will receive expedited processing, unless the applicant is notified in writing to the contrary and provided a basis for that decision. The FDIC may remove the notice from expedited processing for any of the reasons set forth in § 303.11(c)(2). Absent such removal, a notice processed under expedited processing is deemed approved 30 days after receipt of a complete notice by the FDIC (subject to extension for an additional 15 days upon written notice to the bank) or on such earlier date authorized by the FDIC in writing.
( b ) *Standard processing for applications and notices that have been removed from expedited processing.* For an application filed by an insured state savings association seeking to commence or continue an activity under § 362.11(a)(2)(ii), § 362.11(b)(2)(i), § 362.12(b)(1) of this chapter or for notices which are not processed pursuant to the expedited processing procedures, the FDIC will provide the insured state savings association with written notification of the final action as soon as the decision is rendered. The FDIC will normally review and act in such cases within 60 days after receipt of a completed application or notice (subject to extension for an additional 30 days upon written notice to the bank), but failure of the FDIC to act prior to the expiration of these periods does not constitute approval.
( c ) *Notices of activities in excess of an amount permissible for a federal savings association; subsidiary notices.* Receipt of a notice filed by an insured state savings association as required by § 362.11(b)(3) or § 362.15 of this chapter will be acknowledged in writing by the FDIC. The notice will be reviewed at the appropriate FDIC office, which will take such action as it deems necessary and appropriate.
|  |
|--|
|  |  |  | Home  |  Help  |  Sign In |
|  |

| Find a ZIP Code  /  Locate a Post Office  /  Track & Confirm  /  Calculate Postage  /  Change Address  /  Find a Form |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|

|  |  |  |
|--|--|--|
#### Antonio Altieri, Respondent, *v.*Jacob Monaco, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiff upon a trial had before the court, without a jury.

Achille J. Oishei, for appellant.

John Palmieri, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The defendant admitted upon the trial that he received the draft in question; that he cashed the same, and that he failed to pay the proceeds thereof to the plaintiff, but claimed that the latter had purchased goods from him to the amount of sixty dollars, which he had not paid, and for which the defendant set up a counterclaim.

The plaintiff denied that he purchased any goods from the *764defendant and the justice resolved the conflict of testimony in his favor.

We do not think the finding is against the weight of evidence, nor do we perceive any reason for reversing the judgment, since no exception was taken by the appellant upon the trial.

Present: Beeicmah, P. J., Giegebich- and O’Gobmah, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3217

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

AN ACT

To provide for the conveyance of several small parcels of 

National Forest System land in the Apalachicola National Forest, Florida, to resolve boundary discrepancies 

involving the Mt. Trial Primitive Baptist Church of 

Wakulla County, Florida, and for other purposes.
2

HR 3217 RFS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, APALACHICOLA NA4 TIONAL FOREST, FLORIDA. 

5 (a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of 

6 Agriculture may convey, without consideration, to the Mt. 

7 Trial Primitive Baptist Church of Wakulla County, Flor8 ida, all right, title, and interest of the United States in 

9 and to four parcels of real property in the Apalachicola 

10 National Forest, Florida, located in section 5 of township 

11 5 south, range 2 west, Tallahassee meridian, and con12 sisting of approximately 9.95 acres, 0.09 acres, 0.09 acres, 

13 and 0.096 acres, respectively, as depicted on a map, plat 

14 number 5–118, prepared as part of a 1983 Forest Service 

15 survey. 

16 (b) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage 

17 and legal description of the real property to be conveyed 

18 under subsection (a) shall be determined by the Secretary. 

19 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

20 The Secretary may require such additional terms and 

21 conditions in connection with the conveyance under sub-
3

HR 3217 RFS 

1 section (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to pro2 tect the interests of the United States.

Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
#### § 390.315 United States Treasury Time Deposit Open Account.

The term *United States Treasury Time Deposit Open Account* means a non-interest-bearing account maintained in the name of the United States Treasury which may not be withdrawn prior to the expiration of 30 days' written notice from the United States Treasury, or such other period of notice as the Treasury may require. Such accounts are not savings accounts or savings deposits.
# C_2020243EN.01001001.xml

| 23.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/10

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2020/C 243/04)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 20 April 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85036 |
| Decision No | 040/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Iceland |
| Region | Whole territory of Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19 Temporary guarantee scheme |
| Legal basis | Act No 25/2020 amending Act No 121/1997 on State Guarantees. |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Ensure access to liquidity for undertakings facing a sudden shortage of liquidity due to the COVID-19 outbreak |
| Form of aid | Public guarantees |
| Budget | ISK 50 billion |
| Duration | 20 April 2020–31 December 2020 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | The Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs
  Arnarhvoli við Lindargötu, 101 Reykjavík
  ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

20 April 2020

Case No

85036

Decision No

040/20/COL

EFTA State

Iceland

Region

Whole territory of Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19 Temporary guarantee scheme

Legal basis

Act No 25/2020 amending Act No 121/1997 on State Guarantees.

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Ensure access to liquidity for undertakings facing a sudden shortage of liquidity due to the COVID-19 outbreak

Form of aid

Public guarantees

Budget

ISK 50 billion

Duration

20 April 2020–31 December 2020

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

The Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs

Arnarhvoli við Lindargötu, 101 Reykjavík

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
§ 4.34 Where to submit a request. ( a ) *A request for non-public OCC information.* A person requesting information under this subpart, requesting authentication of a record under § 4.39(d), or submitting a notification of the issuance of a subpoena or compulsory process under § 4.37, shall send the request or notification to: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219, Attention: Director, Litigation Division.
( b ) *Combined requests for non-public and other OCC information.* A person requesting public OCC information and non-public OCC information under this subpart may submit a combined request for both to the address in paragraph (a) of this section. If a requester decides to submit a combined request under this section, the OCC will process the combined request under this subpart and not under subpart B of this part (FOIA).
( c ) *Request by government agencies.* A request made pursuant to § 4.37(c) must be submitted: ( 1 ) In a civil action, to the Director of the OCC's Litigation Division at the Washington office; or
( 2 ) In a criminal action, to the appropriate district counsel or the Director of the OCC's Enforcement Division at the Washington office.
[60 FR 57322, Nov. 15, 1995, as amended at 64 FR 29216, June 1, 1999; 79 FR 15641, Mar. 21, 2014; 85 FR 42640, July 14, 2020]
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

From: 

· , "Sent: 

To: 

Subject: .i 

I am sending you an email to strongly recommend you pick SkyWest as the air service provider for Brainerd Mn. I have 

flown out of Brainerd MN on average about every two or three weeks for the last 2 years and I have seen how the 50 

passenger planes currently being used by Delta to service Brainerd have been much more convenient even than the old 

33 seat planes Delta used to use. In addition, the number of passengers using these 50 seat planes has increased 

significantly and I don't see how 19 seat planes from Great Lakes would be able to come anywhere near handling the 

demand. 

Quite frankly, if Great Lakes and their 19 seat planes would be flying out of Brainerd, I would no longer use the Brainerd 

airport. If SkyWest and their 50 seat planes are awarded the service, I see the number of travelers using Brainerd 

increasing in the future. If the 19 seat planes are using, I see the number of travels using Brainerd dropping dramatically 

to the point that the Brainerd airport will ultimately close in the future because of lack of travelers. 

Thanks you 

Mike Yapuncich 

VP of Product Management 

224-698-5563 (Schaumburg) 

320-253-8314 (St. Cloud) 

320-260-2919 (Cell) 

1
# C_2010174EN.01001401.xml

| 1.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/14

---

The EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for three EFTA States applicable as from 1 January 2010

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL 14 July 2004 (OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and in the EEA Supplement No 26/2006, 25.5.2006, p. 1))

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL 14 July 2004 (OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and in the EEA Supplement No 26/2006, 25.5.2006, p. 1))

2010/C 174/06

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of the Authority’s State aid Guidelines as amended by the Authority’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To get the applicable reference rate, appropriate margins have to be added in accordance with the State aid Guidelines. For the discount rate this means that the appropriate margin of 100 basis points has to be added to the base rate. The recovery rate will also normally be calculated by adding 100 basis points to the base rate as foreseen in the Authority’s Decision No 789/08/COL of 17 December 2008 amending the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (published in OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and in the EEA Supplement No 26/2006, 25.5.2006, p. 1).

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.1.2010- | 6,79 | 0,69 | 3,04 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.1.2010-

6,79

0,69

3,04

---
|   | (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Buckeye. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated this 30th day of April 2010                 |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                              |   |
|                                              |   |
| /s/ Steven G. Dean                                |   |
| Steven G. Dean                                    |   |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the period ended September 30, 2010:





1. Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor is it to be deemed to be "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.





Date:  November 15, 2010





/s/ Joseph KozakJoseph Kozak, Chairman, Chief Executive Officerand President





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
Executive Order 13497

# Revocation of Certain Executive Orders Concerning Regulatory Planning and Review

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered that:

**Section 1.**Executive Order 13258 of February 26, 2002, and Executive Order 13422 of January 18, 2007, concerning regulatory planning and review, which amended Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993, are revoked.                

**Sec. 2.**                     The Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the heads of executive departments and agencies shall promptly rescind any orders, rules, regulations, guidelines, or policies implementing or enforcing Executive Order 13258 or Executive Order 13422, to the extent consistent with law.                

**Sec. 3.**                     This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.                

[FR Doc. E9-2486

Billing code 3195-W9-P