CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District

Rule No(s): 102 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended January 13, 2011

Rule Title(s): Definitions

Date Submitted to ARB: February 17, 2011

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Last Amended March, 11, 2010

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Jeremiah Cravens Phone Number: (661) 862-5250 E-mail Address: Cravensj@co.kern.ca.us

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Amended Rule 102, Definitions defines a number of terms t hat are used in other District rules. Reasons for

amending the Rule include: updating the name of the District; adding ten ( 10) definitions; revising language in

three (3) definitions; and adding one compound to the Exempt Compounds list. Minor formatting issues were also

corrected.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):ethylene, lead, asbestos,

beryllium, mercury, vinyl chloride, fluor ides, sulfuric acid mist, hydrogen sulfi de, total reduced sulfur, and reduced sulfur

compounds

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, w ill result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach referenc e(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showi ng how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category:

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: Area Affected:

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure:

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure:

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any):

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed):

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 T PY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 270

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 90 %

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 5 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : Eastern Kern County - Edwards Air Force Base, US Bora x - Boron, Cal-Portland Cement - Mojave, National

Cement - Lebec, and Lehigh Southwest Cement - Tehachapi.

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achievi ng Emission Reductions are:

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practice Standar ds in Section(s): N/A

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): N/A Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: