alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
42514.

#### MILLER, Guardian v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

In a previous appearance before this court, the judgment of the superior court affirming the award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, was reversed with direction that the case be remanded to the board for further findings. See *Miller v. Travelers Ins. Co.,*Ill Ga. App. 245 (141 SE2d 223). In accordance with the direction (p. 249) *719the board referred the case to the Medical Board for investigation and report with respect to all medical questions at issue. The Medical Board reported that claimant’s disability was not the result of an alleged occupational disease. Pursuant to *Code Ann.*§ 114-823 (3) claimant appealed from the report and propounded to the Medical Board interrogatories pertaining to medical evidence. In its final decision on appeal the Medical Board made the same conclusion reached in its report on the original examination, but failed to make claimant’s interrogatories a part of the final decision. The Workmen’s Compensation Board rendered an award denying compensation, based on the decision of the Medical Board. Claimant took this appeal from the judgment of the superior court affirming the board’s award. *Held:*

The Workmen’s Compensation Act *(Code Ann.*§ 114-823 (3)), provides: “Said aggrieved party in said appeal may further propound to the members of said Medical Board or any of them . . . questions pertaining to medical evidence, and the said Medical Board shall see that the said interrogatories so propounded are answered under oath and made a part of the final decision on said appeal.” The purpose of the requirement that the Medical Board incorporate the interrogatories into its final decision is “to enable the losing party to intelligently prepare an appeal and to enable the court to intelligently review such appeal.” See *Atlanta Transit System v. Harcourt,*94 Ga. App. 503 (95 SE2d 41); *Dudley v. Sears Roebuck & Co.,*111 Ga. App. 214, 215 (141 SE2d 179). In those cases and in others which could be cited the failure of the Workmen’s Compensation Board to make a sufficient statement of its findings in connection with the award required recommittal of the cases to the board for further findings. In a decision of the Medical Board involving medical questions, which are difficult of comprehension to lay persons, it is all the more urgent that the board comply fully with the requirements of the Act in stating its findings and conclusions. In this case the failure of the Medical Board to comply with *Code Ann.*§ 114-823 (3) by including in its final decision the interrogatories propounded by claimant vitiates the subsequent award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The judgment affirming the award will be reversed with direction that the case be remanded to the *720Workmen’s Compensation Board for re-reference to the Medical Board.

*Jordan and Pannell, JJ., concur.*

Argued January 6, 1967

Decided May 9, 1967.

*Durden &. Durden, A. N. Durden,*for appellant.

*Perry, Walters, Langstaff & Lippitt, Jesse W. Walters,*for appellees.

*Judgment reversed with direction.*
36–886 

110TH CONGRESS REPT. 110–240 " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session Part 2 

COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE, AND RELATED AGENCIES 

APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2008 

JULY 25, 2007.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 

the Union and ordered to be printed 

Mr. OBEY, from the Committee on Appropriations, 

submitted the following 

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT 

[To accompany H.R. 3093] 

The Committee on Appropriations submits the following supplemental report to clarify the wording of the statement related to 

compliance with clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 

Representatives. 

In place of the paragraph appearing on pages 170 and 171 of the 

report to accompany H.R. 3093 under the heading ‘‘COMPLIANCE

WITH RULE XXI, CL. 9 (EARMARKS)’’, the Committee substitutes the 

following paragraph: 

Pursuant to clause 9 rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives, this bill, as reported, contains the following congressional earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as 

defined in clause 9(d), 9(e), or 9(f) of rule XXI. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
Presidential Documents

52383 

Federal Register 

Vol. 74, No. 196 

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8434 of October 6, 2009 

German-American Day, 2009 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Comprising the Nation’s largest ancestry group, German Americans have 

contributed to our collective identity since the first settlements were founded 

in the 17th century. Essential to the growth of America, these farmers, 

soldiers, entrepreneurs, and patriots gave their strength, determination, and 

in some circumstances, their lives, so we all may experience a brighter 

tomorrow. It is in this spirit that German Americans continue to enrich 

our national character, sharing their proud heritage with new generations 

from every background. Today, we celebrate German Americans for their 

remarkable role in our Nation’s development. 

Our citizens of German descent excel in every discipline and open our 

minds to the expanses of human possibility. When we drive across a suspension bridge, listen to music played on a Steinway piano, or send a child 

to kindergarten, their unique traditions and customs surround us. German 

Americans have influenced our Nation in myriad ways with their industry, 

culture, and engagement in public life. 

Germany and its people have also been active participants in our Nation’s 

history. This year, we celebrate the 60th anniversary of the Federal Republic 

of Germany, and the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. These 

milestones reinforce the German people’s dedication to democratic ideals, 

and we honor the bonds that tie our two nations together. 

America is a stronger Nation because of those families who have established 

longstanding roots in our country, as well as by those who have recently 

emigrated from abroad. German immigrants, inhabiting every major city, 

have given much of themselves throughout our history, selflessly expanding 

the reach of the American Dream. On this day, we celebrate and honor 

the past, present, and future contributions of German Americans to the 

rich and textured story of America. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 6, 2009, 

as German-American Day. I encourage all Americans to learn more about 

the history of German Americans and to commemorate the many contributions they have made to our Nation. 


CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES6
52384 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 13, 2009 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixth day of 

October, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth. 

[FR Doc. E9–24675 

Filed 10–9–09; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–W9–P 


CPrice-Sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES6OB#1.EPS</GPH>
#### § 303.80 Scope.

This subpart implements the provisions of the Change in Bank Control Act of 1978, section 7(j) of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) (CBCA), and sets forth the filing requirements and processing procedures for a notice of change in control with respect to the acquisition of control of a State nonmember bank, a State savings association, or certain parent companies of either a State nonmember bank or a State savings association.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-0673 Directorate ID: 2014-SW-034-AD

Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Model AS350B, AS350BA, AS350B1, AS350B2, 

AS350B3, AS350C, AS350D, AS350D1, AS355E, AS355F, AS355F1, AS355F2, AS355N, 

AS355NP, EC130B4, and EC130T2 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 1,132 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to detect a crack in the rotating star and prevent 

failure of the rotating star and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $8,354 for the rotating star replacement

Labor per Helicopter

(0.25 work-hour x $85/workhour for the visual

inspection)

(1 work-hour x $85/workhour for the dye-penetrant 

inspection)

(16 work-hour x $85/workhour for the rotating star 

replacement)

$21

$85

$1,360

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $21 for the visual inspection

$85 for the dye-penetrant inspection

$9,714 for the rotating star replacement

Total US Fleet Cost $23,772 for the visual inspection

$96,220 for the dye-penetrant inspection

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Robert Grant
#### § 308.146 Powers of person conducting investigation.

The person designated to conduct the investigation shall have the power, among other things, to administer oaths and affirmations, to take and preserve testimony under oath, to issue subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum and to apply for their enforcement to the United States District Court for the judicial district or the United States court in any territory in which the main office of the bank, institution, or affiliate is located or in which the witness resides or conducts business. The person conducting the investigation may obtain the assistance of counsel or others from both within and outside the FDIC. The persons who issue the order of investigation may limit, quash, or modify any subpoena or subpoena duces tecum, upon application and for good cause shown. The person conducting an investigation may report to the Board of Directors any instance where any attorney has engaged in contemptuous, dilatory, obstructionist, or contumacious conduct or has otherwise violated any provision of this part during the course of an investigation. The Board of Directors, upon motion of the person conducting the investigation, or on its own motion, may make a finding of contempt and may then summarily suspend, without a hearing, any attorney representing a witness from further participation in the investigation.

[80 FR 5013, Jan. 30, 2015]
# C_2020023EN.01000601.xml

| 23.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/6

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

(2020/C 23/06)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 18 November 2019 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 84261 |
| Decision No | 078/19/COL |
| EFTA State | Norway |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | FriDA |
| Form of aid | No aid |

Date of adoption of the decision

18 November 2019

Case No

84261

Decision No

078/19/COL

EFTA State

Norway

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

FriDA

Form of aid

No aid

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
II 

Calendar No. 502

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2771

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 6, 2004

Received; read the first time 

MAY 7, 2004

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to reauthorize the 

New York City Watershed Protection Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2771 PCS 

1 SECTION 1. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED PROTECTION 

2 PROGRAM. 

3 Section 1443(d)(4) of the Safe Drinking Water Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 300j–2(d)(4)) is amended by striking ‘‘1997 

5 through 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘2003 through 2010’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 5, 2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk. 

Calendar No. 502

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2771

AN ACT

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to reauProgram. thorize the New York City Watershed Protection 

MAY 7, 2004

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report on theNotification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of2002**
 
SuDoc Number:OP 1.1/4:

Item Number:0834-W-10 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000613257
 
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
 
March 4, 2020
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 194 (Thursday, October 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51862-51863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24369]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Tuesday, October 13, 2009.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

[[Page 51863]]


MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave 
Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-
2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 6, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-24369 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### § 263.110 Recommended decision.

The administrative law judge shall file with the Board a recommended decision on the fee application not later than 30 days after the submission of all pleadings and evidentiary material concerning the application. The recommended decision shall include written proposed findings and conclusions on the applicant's eligibility and its status as a prevailing party and, if applicable, an explanation of the reasons for any difference between the amount requested and the amount of the recommended award. The recommended decision shall also include, if at issue, proposed findings as to whether the Board's position was substantially justified, whether the applicant unduly protracted the proceedings, or whether special circumstances make an award unjust. The administrative law judge shall file the record of the proceeding on the fee application upon the filing of the recommended decision and, at the same time, serve upon each party a copy of the recommended decision, findings, conclusions, and proposed order.
200,000 Shares
                          Solid Management Corporation

                            Share Purchase Agreement

To _______________:

Please issue shares of your common stock in the amounts and name(s) shown below.
My signature  acknowledges  that I have read the Prospectus  dated  ___________,
2000,  and am aware of the risk factors  contained  therein.  I represent that I
have relied  solely upon the contents of the  Prospectus in making an investment
decision with regard to the shares offered thereby, and I have not relied on any
other  statements  made by or with regard to the Company in connection  with its
anticipated operations or financial performance.

The undersigned hereby  acknowledges that City National Bank is acting solely as
Escrow  Holder in  connection  with the  offering  of the  Securities  described
herein, and makes no recommendation with respect thereto. City National Bank has
made no investigation  regarding the offering, the issuer or any other person or
entity involved in the offering.


 _____________________________    _____________________________
(Signature)                                   (Date)

 _____________________________   ______________________________
(Signature)                                   (Date)

Enclosed is payment for ________ shares at $________;
Total: $________

Register the shares in the following name(s) and amount(s):
(Please Print)
Name(s):_________________________________________________________

Number of share(s): ________________

As (check one) [ ] Individual [ ] Joint  Tenancy [ ] Husband & Wife as community
property[ ] Tenants in Common [ ] Corporation [ ] Trust [ ] Other:

For the person(s) who will be registered shareowners:
Mailing Address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone:
Social Security or Taxpayer ID Number(s):

Note:  Please attach any instructions for mailing the certificates or shareowner
communications other than to the registered shareowner at this address.
<PAGE>

No Subscription Is Effective Until Acceptance.
Subscription Accepted by  _______________:


_________________________
Devinder Randhawa, President

Date _____________________
# C_2013132EN.01001201.xml

| 9.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/12

---

Amendments to the rules of procedure of the EFTA Court

adopted by the Court on 16 May 2012

(Only the English text is authentic)

2013/C 132/07

THE EFTA COURT,

Having regard to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and Court of Justice, signed in Oporto on 2 May 1992, and in particular Article 43(2) thereof;

Having regard to Protocol 5 to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice, on the Statute of the Court, and in particular Article 43 thereof;

Whereas it is necessary for the Court, in the light of experience, to have a clear legal basis for the enactment of practice directions with a view to improving the conduct of the proceedings, in particular with regard to the lodging of written pleadings and the conduct of hearings before it,

ADOPTS THE FOLLOWING DECISION AMENDING ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE:

Article 1

The following text shall be inserted after Article 97a:

‘Article 97b

The Court may issue practice directions relating in particular to the preparation and conduct of the hearings before it and to the lodging of written statements of case or written observations.’

Article 2

1.   This Decision, which is authentic in English, shall be published in the EEA Section of, and the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union, and shall enter into force on the day following its publication.

Official Journal of the European Union

2.   This Decision shall be officially translated by the Court into German, Icelandic and Norwegian.

Luxembourg, 16 May 2012.

Páll HREINSSON

Judge

Carl BAUDENBACHER

President

Per CHRISTIANSEN

Judge

---
§ 390.422 Public disclosure and confidential treatment. ( a ) Any offering circular, amendment, exhibit, notice, or report filed pursuant to this subpart will be publicly available. Any other related documents will be treated in accordance with the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), and parts 309 and 310 of this chapter.
( b ) Any requests for confidential treatment of information in a document required to be filed under this subpart shall be made as required under Commission Rule 24b-2 (17 CFR 240.24b-2) under the Exchange Act.
From:

To:

Subject:

Date:

Duncan, Jeff

EAS COST)

Great Lakes Airlines

Thursday, August 22, 2013 5:59:41 PM

I am writing this email in support of Great Lakes Airlines' proposal for three (3) daily

roundtrip flights between Vernal and Denver.

Regards,

Jeff Duncan

Anadarko Midstream

Production Superintendent

PO 970 (1176 East, 1500 South)

Vernal, Utah 84078

C 435.828,6402

0435,781,7030

Click here for Anadarko's Electronic Mail Disclaimer

~....,..'

'->'~
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                             BELL MICROPRODUCTS INC.
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Numbers 333-39916, 333-45554 and 333-62842) and in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Numbers 333-51724, 33-8398, 33-66580,
33-9568, 333-10837, 333-41179, 333-58053 and 333-72642) of Bell Microproducts
Inc. of our report dated February 13, 2002, except as to Note 13 which is as of
March 29, 2002 relating to the financial statements and financial schedule,
which appear in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California

March 29, 2002