alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4.73 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: *Bank holding company* means any company that controls a bank (as provided in section 2 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 *et seq.*)).
*Consultant.* For purposes of this subpart, a consultant for a national bank, savings association, bank holding company, savings and loan holding company, or other company shall include only an individual who works directly on matters for, or on behalf of, such bank, savings association, bank holding company, savings and loan holding company, or other company.
*Control* has the meaning given in section 2 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1841(a)) or in section 10 of the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1467a), as applicable under the circumstances. For purposes of this subpart, a foreign bank shall be deemed to control any branch or agency of the foreign bank.
*Depository institution* has the meaning given in section 3 of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(c)). For purposes of this subpart, a depository institution includes an uninsured branch or agency of a foreign bank, if such branch or agency is located in any State.
*Federal Reserve* means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Reserve Banks.
*Foreign bank* means any foreign bank or company described in section 8(a) of the International Banking Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3106(a)).
*Insured depository institution* has the meaning given in section 3 of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(c)(2)).
*National bank* means a national banking association or a Federal branch or agency of a foreign bank.
*Savings association* has the meaning given in section 3 of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(b)(1)).
*Savings and loan holding company* means any company that controls a savings association or any other company that is a savings and loan holding company (as provided in section 10 of the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1467a)).
*Senior examiner.* For purposes of this subpart, an officer or employee of the OCC is considered to be the “senior examiner” for a particular national bank or savings association if— ( 1 ) The officer or employee has been authorized by the OCC to conduct examinations on behalf of the OCC;
( 2 ) The officer or employee has been assigned continuing, broad, and lead responsibility for examining the national bank or savings association; and
( 3 ) The officer's or employee's responsibilities for examining the national bank or savings association— ( i ) Represent a substantial portion of the officer's or employee's assigned responsibilities; and
( ii ) Require the officer or employee to interact routinely with officers or employees of the national bank or savings association, or its affiliates.”
[70 FR 69637, Nov. 17, 2005, as amended at 76 FR 43563, July 21, 2011]
Placeholder: C onfidential Business I nformation item

Coolgas Inc. CBI Comment on 3 - 1 3 - 1 2 For more information please contact David Don aldson by phone at 202 - 343 - 9086 or by email at donaldson.david@epa.gov .
§ 41.91 Duties of card issuers regarding changes of address. ( a ) *Scope.* This section applies to an issuer of a debit or credit card (card issuer) that is a national bank; a Federal savings association; a Federal branch or agency of a foreign bank; or an operating subsidiary of any of these institutions that is not a functionally regulated subsidiary within the meaning of section 5(c)(5) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1844(c)(5)).
( b ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section: ( 1 ) *Cardholder* means a consumer who has been issued a credit or debit card.
( 2 ) *Clear and conspicuous* means reasonably understandable and designed to call attention to the nature and significance of the information presented.
( 3 ) *Consumer* means an individual.
( c ) *Address validation requirements.* A card issuer must establish and implement reasonable policies and procedures to assess the validity of a change of address if it receives notification of a change of address for a consumer's debit or credit card account and, within a short period of time afterwards (during at least the first 30 days after it receives such notification), the card issuer receives a request for an additional or replacement card for the same account. Under these circumstances, the card issuer may not issue an additional or replacement card, until, in accordance with its reasonable policies and procedures and for the purpose of assessing the validity of the change of address, the card issuer: ( 1 ) ( i ) Notifies the cardholder of the request: ( A ) At the cardholder's former address; or
( B ) By any other means of communication that the card issuer and the cardholder have previously agreed to use; and
( ii ) Provides to the cardholder a reasonable means of promptly reporting incorrect address changes; or
( 2 ) Otherwise assesses the validity of the change of address in accordance with the policies and procedures the card issuer has established pursuant to § 41.90 of this part.
( d ) *Alternative timing of address validation.* A card issuer may satisfy the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section if it validates an address pursuant to the methods in paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this section when it receives an address change notification, before it receives a request for an additional or replacement card.
( e ) *Form of notice.* Any written or electronic notice that the card issuer provides under this paragraph must be clear and conspicuous and provided separately from its regular correspondence with the cardholder.
[72 FR 63753, Nov. 9, 2007, as amended at 79 FR 28401, May 16, 2014]
# • AOC

CAL

CAMU CEI CFR. CME· 

### CMI CMS EARL ACRONYM 

### KEy Area ofContamination. Ecology policydesigned to wave federal and/or State requirements for cleanup sites. Current Authorization Level. Budget need for next biennium to fund current Program (current staff, promotions, raises, etc.) Corrective Action Management Units. Compliance Evaluation Inspection. Code ofFederal Regulations Comprehensive GroundwaterMonitoring Evaluation. Corrective Measures Implementation Corrective Measures Study Essential Authorization Request Level. Additions to the CALrequired by federal or state legislation, etc. 

# e· EMT EPA-WOO EPT FOIA IPA LDF MTCA O&M

PCHB RCW RFA Executive Management Team. Program levelmanagers. Environmental Protection Agency- Washington Operations Office. Executive PolicyTeam. Uppermanagement team. Freedom of Information Act Inter-Program Agreement (EPA pays for staff to be working at Ecology) Land Disposal Facility Model Toxies Cleanup Action. Health based standards for cleanup. Operation and Maintenance; Refers to checking groundwater monitoring wells for proper operation. Pollution Control Hearing Board Revised Code ofWashington RCRA Facility Assessments.

### RFI RIP SEA 1'50 1'5F 

### TU USC WAC RCRA Facility Investigations. RCRA Implementation Plan. Guidelines from federal EPA on SEA. State/EPAAgreement. Treatment/Storage/Disposal Facility Treatment/Storage Facility Temporary Unit United States Code Washington Administrative Code
# C_2016320EN.01000801.xml

| 1.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/8

---

EFTA Surveillance Authority notice on State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as from 1 January 2016

Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of the Authority’s Decision No 195/04/COL of 14 July 2004 (OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and EEA Supplement No 26/2006, 25.5.2006, p. 1)

(2016/C 320/09)

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of the Authority’s State Aid Guidelines as amended by the Authority’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To obtain the applicable reference rates, appropriate margins shall be added to the base rate in accordance with the State Aid Guidelines.

Base rates have been determined as follows:

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.1.2016 – | 6,77 | - 0,63 | 1,16 |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

1.1.2016 –

6,77

- 0,63

1,16

---
§ 261a.5 Request for access to records. ( a ) *Procedures for making request.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) or (f) of this section, if you (or your guardian) want to learn of the existence of, or to gain access to, your record in a system of records, you may submit a request in writing to the Secretary of the Board, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20551.
( 2 ) If you request information contained in a system of records maintained by the Board's OIG, you may submit the request in writing to the Inspector General, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20551.
( b ) *Contents of request.* Except for requests made under paragraph (f) of this section, your written request must include- ( 1 ) A statement that the request is made pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974;
( 2 ) The name of the system of records you believe contains the record you request, or a concise description of that system of records;
( 3 ) Information necessary to verify your identity pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section; and
( 4 ) Any other information that might assist us in identifying the record you seek (*e.g.,* maiden name, dates of employment, *etc.*).
( c ) *Verification of identity.* We will require proof of your identity, and we reserve the right to determine whether the proof you submit is adequate. In general, we will consider the following to be adequate proof of identity: ( 1 ) If you are a current or former Board employee, your Board identification card; or
( 2 ) If you are not a current or former Board employee, either ( i ) Two forms of identification, including one photo identification, or
( ii ) A notarized statement attesting to your identity.
( d ) *Verification of identity not required.* We will not require verification of identity when the records you seek are available to any person under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552).
( e ) *Request for accounting of previous disclosures.* You may request an accounting of previous disclosures of records pertaining to you in a system of records as provided in 5 U.S.C. 552a(c).
( f ) *Requests Made by Board Employees.* Unless the Secretary provides and you are notified otherwise, if you are a current or former Board employee, you also may request access to your record in a system of records by appearing in person before or writing directly to the Board office that maintains the record.
42405.

#### COHRAN v. HARPER.

Pannell, Judge.

Plaintiff sued the defendant, a physician, charging him with malpractice arising out of an alleged “staph” infection she received on a hypodermic needle used by the physician’s nurse in giving plaintiff an injection of penicillin at the physician’s direction and in his presence, which injection resulted in osteomyelitis. The grounds of negligence were “(a) the defendant knowing that your plaintiff was allergic to penicillin failed to make an allergy test; (b) that the defendant failed to properly sterilize the hypodermic needle which was used to inject in and administered to your plaintiff a certain dose of penicillin.” On motion for summary judgment the uncontradicted evidence of the plaintiff herself showed she suffered no allergic reactions to the penicillin. The evidence also showed without dispute that a prepackaged sterilized needle and syringe were used which was in accordance with proper and accepted medical practice *(Mull v. Emory Univ.,*114 Ga. App. 63 (4) (150 SE2d 276)) and that the nurse’s hands never touched the needle. Assuming, but not deciding, that there was evidence that the needle was contaminated and the plaintiff’s ailment was *278caused thereby, there is no evidence that either the physician or his nurse or anyone in his office knew or by the exercise of ordinary care could have discovered that the prepackaged needle and syringe were so contaminated; or that, if the needle and syringe were contaminated, either the physician, his nurse, or someone in his employ through negligence or otherwise caused the contamination. The trial judge upon failure of the proof to make an issue as to either ground of negligence or that such negligence caused the injury and damage to the plaintiff, did not err in granting summary judgment for the defendant, there being no material issue arising out of the proof to be submitted to a jury. Ga. L. 1959, p. 234, et seq. *(Code Ann.*'§ 110-1201, et seq.).

*Felton, C. J., and Frankum, P. J., concur.*

Argued November 8, 1966

Decided February 7, 1967

Rehearing denied February 21, 1967

*Larry Cohran,*for appellant.

*Troutman, Sams, Schroder & Lockerman, T. M. Smith, Jr., Robert L. Pennington,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*
§ 192.505 Restrictions on the trading of shares by directors, officers, and associates. ( a ) *Sales restriction.* Directors and officers who purchase conversion shares may not sell the shares for one year after the date of purchase, except that in the event of the death of the officer or director, the successor in interest may sell the shares.
( b ) *Notice of sales restriction on stock certificate.* The savings association must include notice of the restriction described in paragraph (a) of this section on each certificate of stock that a director or officer purchases during the conversion or receives in connection with a stock dividend, stock split, or otherwise with respect to such restricted shares.
( c ) *Stock purchase restrictions.* For three years after the conversion, the savings association's officers, directors, and their associates may purchase the savings association's stock only from a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. However, the savings association's officers, directors, and their associates may engage in a negotiated transaction involving more than one percent of the savings association's outstanding stock, and may purchase stock through any of the savings association's management or employee stock benefit plans.
( d ) *Communication of restrictions with transfer agent.* The savings association must instruct its stock transfer agent about the transfer restrictions in this section.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to my knowledge, the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of ANTs software inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), for the quarter ended September 30, 2005:

     1. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2005                By: /s/ Kenneth Ruotolo
      -----------------                    -------------------------------------
                                           Kenneth Ruotolo
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be
retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request.
# C_2017026EN.01000701.xml

| 26.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/7

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

(2017/C 26/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 24 October 2016 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 79525 |
| Decision No | : | 193/16/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : | Sale of electricity to Norðurál |
| Legal basis | : | The Third Amendment to the power contract concluded in 1997 between Landsvirkjun and Norðurál Grundartangi ehf. |
| Type of measure | : | No State aid |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

24 October 2016

Case No

Case No

:

79525

Decision No

Decision No

:

193/16/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Sale of electricity to Norðurál

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

The Third Amendment to the power contract concluded in 1997 between Landsvirkjun and Norðurál Grundartangi ehf.

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

No State aid

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
§ 352.2 Application. ( a ) This part applies to all programs, activities, and electronic and information technology developed, procured, maintained, used or conducted by the FDIC. The following programs and activities involve the direct provision of benefits and services to, or participation by, members of the public: ( 1 ) Attending Board of Directors meetings open to the public and all other public meetings;
( 2 ) Making inquiries or filing complaints at the FDIC Office of Legislative Affairs and Office of Public Affairs;
( 3 ) Using the FDIC library in Washington, DC;
( 4 ) Using the FDIC Web site on the Internet;
( 5 ) Visiting an insured bank at which they conducted business (or an alternative liquidation site selected by the FDIC) and which has become insolvent, or been purchased by another bank under FDIC supervision, for the purpose of: ( i ) Collecting FDIC checks for the insured amount of their deposits previously held in such bank; and/or
( ii ) Discussing with FDIC representatives matters related to the repayment of debts which they previously owed to such bank, prior to its failure or purchase by another bank under FDIC supervision;
( 6 ) Seeking employment with the FDIC;
( b ) This regulation governs the conduct of FDIC personnel in their interaction with employees of insured banks and employees of other state or federal agencies while discharging the FDIC's statutory obligations as insurer and/or receiver of financial institutions. It does not apply to financial institutions insured by the FDIC.
( c ) Although application for employment and employment with the FDIC are programs and activities of the FDIC for purposes of this regulation, they shall be governed only by the standards set forth in § 352.6 of this part.
§ 229.51 General provisions governing substitute checks. ( a ) *Legal equivalence.* A substitute check for which a bank has provided the warranties described in § 229.52 is the legal equivalent of an original check for all persons and all purposes, including any provision of federal or state law, if the substitute check— ( 1 ) Accurately represents all of the information on the front and back of the original check as of the time the original check was truncated; and
( 2 ) Bears the legend, “This is a legal copy of your check. You can use it the same way you would use the original check.”
( b ) *Reconverting bank duties.* A bank shall ensure that a substitute check for which it is the reconverting bank— ( 1 ) Bears all indorsements applied by parties that previously handled the check in any form (including the original check, a substitute check, or another paper or electronic representation of such original check or substitute check) for forward collection or return;
( 2 ) Identifies the reconverting bank in a manner that preserves any previous reconverting-bank identifications, in accordance with ANS X9.100-140; and
( 3 ) Identifies the bank that truncated the original check, in accordance with ANS X9.100-140.
( c ) *Applicable law.* A substitute check that is the legal equivalent of an original check under paragraph (a) of this section shall be subject to any provision, including any provision relating to the protection of customers, of this part, the U.C.C., and any other applicable federal or state law as if such substitute check were the original check, to the extent such provision of law is not inconsistent with the Check 21 Act or this subpart.
[69 FR 47311, Aug. 4, 2004, as amended at 82 FR 27584, June 15, 2017]
Editorial Note on Part 225
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 225 appear at 69 FR 77618, Dec. 28, 2004.

§ 225.126 Activities not closely related to banking. Pursuant to section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company Act and § 225.4(a) of Regulation Y, the Board of Governors has determined that the following activities are not so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto: ( a ) Insurance premium funding—that is, the combined sale of mutual funds and insurance.
( b ) Underwriting life insurance that is not sold in connection with a credit transaction by a bank holding company, or a subsidiary thereof.
( c ) Real estate brokerage (see 1972 Fed. Res. Bulletin 428).
( d ) Land development (see 1972 Fed. Res. Bulletin 429).
( e ) Real estate syndication.
( f ) Management consulting (see 1972 Fed. Res. Bulletin 571).
( g ) Property management (see 1972 Fed. Res. Bulletin 652).
[Reg. Y, 37 FR 20329, Sept. 29, 1972; 37 FR 21938, Oct. 17, 1972, as amended at 54 FR 37302, Sept. 8, 1989]
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
     We have issued our report dated June 7, 2004 (except for Note 16, as towhich the date is June 18, 2004), accompanying the consolidated financialstatements and schedule included in the Annual Report of MTI TechnologyCorporation and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended April 3, 2004. Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in theRegistration Statements of MTI Technology Corporation on Forms S-8 (Nos.333-109060, 333-103065, 333-85410, 333-76972, 333-69030, 333-66716, 333-95915,333-92623, 333-85579, 333-61957, 333-46363, 333-50377, 333-18501, 33-75180 and33-80438) and Form S-3 (No. 333-85410).
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Irvine, California
#### Louis F. Dommerich, Respondent, *v.*Morris Garfunkel et al., Appellants.

Appeal from a determination of the General Term of the City Oourt of the city of Few York, affirming a judgment of the Trial Term, rendered on the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff.

H. L. Franklin, for appellants.

M. D. Steuer (Abraham S. Levy, of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The defendants’ witnesses testified on the trial that the goods sold in September, were the same goods as those sold in July, while the warranty set up in the defense and counter*744claim was that the goods .were *“*good merchantable cloths, fit to be manufactured into cloaks fit for ordinary use and wear.”

The defendants sought to show on the trial what kind of goods certain July goods were, but this evidence was excluded. There was no error in this ruling. To show that the goods delivered in September, were not the same goods as those delivered in July, did not tend to establish the defendants’ defense.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Tbuax, P. J., Soott and Dugeo, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.