alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      31.2




**CERTIFICATION**







I,
      Peter Frugone, certify that:




1.
      I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arrow Resources
      Development, Inc.;




2.
      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
      a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
      in
      Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
      have:




a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
      quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
      our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)
      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




(b)
      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial
      reporting.




Date: November
      17, 2008.




/s/
      Peter Frugone


Principal
      Accounting Officer
§ 303.249 Management official interlocks. ( a ) *Scope.* This section contains the procedures to be followed by an insured State nonmember bank or an insured State savings association to seek the approval of FDIC to establish an interlock pursuant to the Depository Institutions Management Interlocks Act (12 U.S.C. 3207), section 13 of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1823(k)), and part 348 of this chapter.
( b ) *Where to file.* Applicants shall submit a letter application to the appropriate FDIC office.
( c ) *Content of filing.* The application shall contain the following: ( 1 ) A description of the proposed interlock;
( 2 ) A statement of reason as to why the interlock will not result in a monopoly or a substantial lessening of competition; and
( 3 ) If the applicant is seeking an exemption set forth in § 348.6 of this chapter, a description of the particular exemption which is being requested and a statement of reasons as to why the exemption is applicable.
( d ) *Additional information.* The FDIC may request additional information at any time during processing of the filing.
( e ) *Processing.* The FDIC will provide the applicant with written notification of the final action when the decision is rendered.
[67 FR 79247, Dec. 27, 2002. Redesignated at 71 FR 20526, Apr. 21, 2006; 84 FR 2706, Feb. 8, 2019; 86 FR 8097, Feb. 3, 2021]
§ 313.89 Date of decision. The hearing official shall issue a written opinion stating his or her decision as soon as practicable, but not later than sixty (60) days after the date on which the request for such hearing was received by the FDIC. If the FDIC is unable to provide the debtor with a hearing and decision within sixty (60) days after the receipt of the request for such hearing: ( a ) The FDIC may not issue a withholding order until the hearing is held and a decision rendered; or
( b ) If the FDIC had previously issued a withholding order to the debtor's employer, the withholding order will be suspended beginning on the 61st day after the date the FDIC received the hearing request and continuing until a hearing is held and a decision is rendered.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2951

To prohibit the operation of nuclear power plants unless there exists a 

State and county certified radiological emergency response plan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2003

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself, Mr. HINCHEY, and Mr. ENGEL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To prohibit the operation of nuclear power plants unless 

there exists a State and county certified radiological 

emergency response plan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear Accountability 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT. 

7 No nuclear utilization facility (within the meaning of 

8 the Atomic Energy Act of 1954) may operate unless the 

9 Nuclear Regulatory Commission finds with respect to the 

10 facility that the State in which the facility is located, and 
2

•HR 2951 IH 

1 each affected county or county equivalent located within 

2 a 10-mile radius of the facility, has certified within the 

3 last year a radiological emergency response plan which 

4 provides reasonable assurance that public health and safe5 ty is not endangered by the operation of the facility.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3118 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 110
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3118

                          [Report No. 108-317]

To designate the Orville Wright Federal Building and the Wilbur Wright 
         Federal Building in Washington, District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2003

 Mr. Hayes (for himself, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Burr, Mr. Turner of Ohio, 
Mr. Coble, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. Taylor of North Carolina, Mr. 
    McIntyre, Mr. Ballance, Mr. Hobson, Mr. Holden, Mr. Pearce, Mr. 
  Beauprez, and Mrs. Myrick) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                            October 15, 2003

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Orville Wright Federal Building and the Wilbur Wright 
         Federal Building in Washington, District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ORVILLE WRIGHT FEDERAL BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building located at 800 Independence 
Avenue, Southwest, in Washington, District of Columbia, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Orville Wright Federal Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Orville Wright Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. WILBUR WRIGHT FEDERAL BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building located at 600 Independence 
Avenue, Southwest, in Washington, District of Columbia, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Wilbur Wright Federal Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Wilbur Wright Federal Building''.

                                                 House Calendar No. 110

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3118

                          [Report No. 108-317]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the Orville Wright Federal Building and the Wilbur Wright 
         Federal Building in Washington, District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 15, 2003

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit 32.1

BERNARD CHAUS, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bernard Chaus, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |   |                                                                                                                      
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |   |                                                                                                                                                     
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | • | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 05, 2008

/s/ Josephine Chaus
Josephine Chaus
Chairwoman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer


---
NEGLIGENCE.

[Lucas Circuit Court,

January Term, 1894.]

Bentley, Haynes and Scribner, JJ.

#### Findlay Brewing Co. v. Delos W. Bellman.

Unguarded Tank in Sidewalk.

A brewery company having placed a tank in the street at the side of the brewery, for hot mash, and leaving same uncovered or unguarded, is liable for injuries to a boy six years of age, who slipped into the tank and was badly scalded.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas county.

*Waite & Snyder,*for plaintiff in error.

*Beard &*Beard, for defendant in error.

Haynes, J.

In this case Bellman sued the Brewing Company for costs and expenses in the care of and attention to his infant son, who, as he alleges, received injuries through the negligence of the Brewing Company.

The alleged negligence consisted in the Brewing Company placing in the street and at the side of the brewery building a tank sixteen feet in length, three feet, ten inches high, and some four feet wide, into which it was accustomed to convey by a spout the hot “mash” from its brewing tubs, from whence it was taken, when cool, by a party to whom the company had sold the same, who, in turn, sold and delivered the same to his customers.

Plaintiff’s son, six years of age, went with a boy ten years of age who went to receive “mash.” The “mash” not being cool when they arrived, the boys got upon the edge of the box to see the “mash” run into the box. While sitting there, by some means unexplained, the boys slipped into the hot “mash,” and the plaintiff's son was badly scalded. There was no covering to the box, nor was any one appointed to watch or care for it. The lad was then six" years of age, and was absent from home without knowledge of his parents, and without any apparent negligence on their part. Verdict and judgment was for plaintiff, Bellman.

' The plaintiff in error contended in argument that there was no actionable negligence on its part, and no cause of action shown against it. *Held,*under authority of *Harriman*v. *Railway Co.,*45 O. S., 11, and like cases, that the Brewing Company was properly held liable.

Judgment affirmed.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
  

	
	 Confidential Materials omitted and filed
separately with the
 Securities and Exchange Commission. Double asterisks denote omissions.


 LICENSE AGREEMENT- AMENDMENT TWO 

This second Amendment (hereinafter “Amendment Two”) serves as a modification to the License Agreement, having an effective date of October 14,
2013, and having a first amendment with an effective date of December 27, 2013, made by and between the University of Iowa Research Foundation, an Iowa Corporation having its principal office at 6 Gilmore Hall, 112 North Capitol Street, Iowa
City, Iowa 52242 (hereinafter “UIRF”), and Spark Therapeutics, Inc., formerly known as AAVenue Therapeutics, LLC (hereinafter “Licensee”), having offices at 3737 Market Street, Suite 1300, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (hereinafter
“Agreement”). 
 WHEREAS, UIRF and Licensee desire that the Agreement be amended in order to add patents and patent applications described and
disclosed as part of: 
 [**]. 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, UIRF and Licensee, intending to be bound, hereby mutually agree to the following: 
  

	1.	Appendix A “Patent Rights” shall be amended to add the following patents and patent applications: 

  

																	
	 UIRF
 Invention

No.
	  	Title of Patent
Application	 	Application
No.	 	 Patent /

IP No.
	  	Application
Filing Date	 	 Issue

Date of
 Patent
	  	Status	 	 Country

of Filing
	 	 UIRF

Patent No.

		  		 		 		  		 		  		 		 	
	[**]	  	[**]	 	[**]	 		  	[**]	 		  	[**]	 	[**]	 	[**]
		  		 		 		  		 		  		 		 	
	[**]	  	[**]	 	[**]	 		  	[**]	 		  	[**]	 	[**]	 	[**]
		  		 		 		  		 		  		 		 	
	[**]	  	[**]	 	[**]	 		  	[**]	 		  	[**]	 	[**]	 	[**]

  

	2.	In accordance with Section 6.1 of the License, which states that “LICENSEE shall reimburse UIRF for all reasonable expenses UIRF incurs for the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of PATENT
RIGHTS”, Licensee agrees to pay UIRF for all unreimbursed out-of-pocket patent expenses relating to the PATENT RIGHTS, which includes new patent families specified in Article 1 of this Amendment Two. 


	3.	As partial consideration for the addition of patents and patent applications to Appendix A “Patent Rights,” as described in Article I above, LICENSEE will pay to the UIRF a non-refundable amount of [**] U.S.
Dollars ($[**]). 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment Two in duplicate originals by their duly authorized
officer or representative. The effective date of this Amendment is March 12, 2015. 








									
	University of Iowa Research Foundation				Spark Therapeutics, Inc.
					
	By:		 /s/ Zev Sunleaf
				By:		 /s/ Jeffrey D. Marrazzo

	Name:		Zev Sunleaf				Name:		Jeffrey D. Marrazzo
	Title:		Executive Director				Title:		President and CEO
					
	Date:		March 23, 2015				Date:		March 23, 2015
§ 335.111 Forms and schedules. The Exchange Act regulations of the SEC, which are cross referenced under this part, require the filing of forms and schedules as applicable. Reference is made to SEC Exchange Act regulation 17 CFR part 249 regarding the availability of all applicable SEC Exchange Act forms. Required schedules are codified and are found within the context of the SEC's regulations. All forms and schedules shall be titled with the name of the FDIC in substitution for the name of the SEC. The filing of forms and schedules shall be made with the FDIC at the address in § 335.701 or may be filed electronically at FDIC*connect* at *https://www2.fdicconnect.gov/index.asp .* However, electronic filing of Beneficial Ownership Forms 3, 4 and 5 is required. Copies of Forms 3 (§ 335.611), 4 (§ 335.612) and 5 (§ 335.613) and the instructions thereto may be printed and downloaded from *https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/forms .* [75 FR 73949, Nov. 30, 2010]
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.3(b)

Easement, License and Attachment Agreement (Morgantown) between Potomac Electric
Power Company, Southern Energy Mid-Atlantic, LLC and Southern Energy Piney
Point, LLC dated as of December 19, 2000

Easement, License and Attachment Agreement (Chalk Point) between Potomac
Electric Power Company, Southern Energy Chalk Point, LLC and Southern Energy
Piney Point, LLC dated as of December 19, 2000
fbec8kex101050515.htm


 



FBEC Worldwide Inc.


 





 

 

















RESOLUTION FROM THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS







The undersigned, being members of the Board of Directors of FBEC Worldwide Inc., a Wyoming Corporation, do hereby declare and state that they consent to and hereby adopt the following resolutions and/or the following actions:







RESOLVED:  According to the Board of Director meeting on May 1, 2015, the Board unanimously agreed to do the following:







In accordance with the Amendment NO. 1 to the Employment Agreement for Robert Sand, Chairman and CEO, the Company is obligated to issue 150,000,000 of common stock. Therefore, the Company authorizes Securities Transfer Corporation to issue 150,000,000 Restricted Common Shares in the name of Robert Sand. 







Pursuant to the request of S&L Capital, LLC, the Board has authorized the conversion of 8,999 Preferred Series-A Stock to Restricted Common Stock pursuant the conversion features as stated in the Articles of Incorporation. There will be a 12 month maturity date of the restricted common stock effective May 1, 2016. S&L Capital, LLC agrees to allow the company the right of first refusal to prepay the common stock and retire the restricted common shares back to the treasury on or before the maturity date. According to the Articles of Incorporation, the shares of Preferred Stock created hereby shall be designated the "Series A Convertible Preferred Stock" (the "Series A Preferred Stock") and the authorized number of shares constituting such series shall be 10,000, par value $.001, with a stated value of $100 per preferred share. The Series A Preferred Stock shall rank senior to the all other classes of Preferred Stock as to dividends, distributions or as to distributions of assets upon liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary. Subject to and upon compliance with the provisions with the holders of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled, at their option, at any time to convert all or any such shares of Series A Preferred Stock into a number of fully paid and non-assessable shares (calculated as to each conversion to the nearest 1/100,000th of a share) of Common Stock. The number of shares of Common Stock to which a holder of Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled upon conversion shall be determined by dividing (x) $100 by (y) the average of the closing bid price for the 10 days prior to the conversion request or requirement of the  Company’s Common Stock.  This formula is referred to as the “Conversion Formula”. Therefore, the company authorizes Securities Transfer Corporation to convert 8,999 shares of Preferred Series-A shares to  53,406,528 restricted Common shares in the name of S&L Capital, LLC.







I certify that the Corporation is duly organized and existing and has the power to take action called for by the above Resolution dated May 1, 2015.






















Acknowledged by:







 


 




 



	 		 
	 	 	 
	Robert S. Sand, CEO 	 
Michael Wilcox, Director

	 





 


 


 



● 1621 Central Avenue  ●  Cheyenne, WY 82001  (714) 330-3798
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Saint Kitts and Nevis National Day

# 									Saint Kitts and Nevis National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 19, 2022

On behalf of the United States of America, I congratulate the people and government of Saint Kitts and Nevis on the 39th anniversary of your independence.

The people of Saint Kitts and Nevis have exhibited an impressive resiliency over the past few difficult years of the COVID-19 pandemic, while standing firm in their commitment to democratic values. We value Saint Kitts and Nevis’s significant contributions as a respected member of numerous international organizations, as well as your ongoing cooperation with the United States in promoting regional security through the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative. We will continue to work together through the U.S.-Caribbean Partnership to Address the Climate Crisis (PACC 2030) and other initiatives to promote energy security, combat climate change, bolster food security, and encourage economic prosperity in the region.

I reaffirm the U.S. commitment to fortifying the ties between our two countries and to addressing global challenges together in the years ahead.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonSaint Kitts and NevisThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 237
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart A of part 237 appear at 80 FR 74898, 74910, Nov. 30, 2015.

§ 237.10 Documentation of margin matters. A covered swap entity shall execute trading documentation with each counterparty that is either a swap entity or financial end user regarding credit support arrangements that: ( a ) Provides the covered swap entity and its counterparty with the contractual right to collect and post initial margin and variation margin in such amounts, in such form, and under such circumstances as are required by this subpart, and at such time as initial margin or variation margin is required to be collected or posted under § 237.3 or § 237.4, as applicable; and
( b ) Specifies: ( 1 ) The methods, procedures, rules, and inputs for determining the value of each non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based swap for purposes of calculating variation margin requirements; and
( 2 ) The procedures by which any disputes concerning the valuation of non-cleared swaps or non-cleared security-based swaps, or the valuation of assets collected or posted as initial margin or variation margin, may be resolved; and
( c ) Describes the methods, procedures, rules, and inputs used to calculate initial margin for non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security based swaps entered into between the covered swap entity and the counterparty.
[80 FR 74898, 74911, Nov. 30, 2015, as amended at 85 FR 39774, July 1, 2020]
#### THOMAS M. SHAY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF DELAWARE ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Submitted October 27, 1939

Decided January 25, 1940.

For the appellants, *Patrick H. Harding.*

For the respondents, *Ralph W. Wescott, Edwin S. Dickerson, Jr.,*and *Gene R. Mariano.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.

*For reversa*l—None.