alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 FW: Question Regarding your 2013 P aper in Atmospheric Environment Subject:

Attachments: table 2.docx

From: 孟夏 [ mailto:mengxxia@gmail.com ]

Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 9:45 PM

To: Sacks, Jason < Sacks.Jason@epa.gov >

Cc: ??? < haidongkan@gmail.com >

Subject: RE: Question Regarding your 2013 Paper in Atmospheric Environment



### Dear Jason

Thanks for your interest in our article. I am Xia Meng, the fir st author of this

article. Sorry for my late reply because of the Spring Festival holiday in China.

I checked “table 2”in this article. I believe it was one press mistake and I didn’t

recognize it in the last editable version. I’m so sorry for my carelessness.

The attachment is the original version of “table 2”. They shoul d be “adjusted for

PM10”in the columns titled “adjusted for SO2”for SO2 and “adjus ted for NO2”for NO2.

Best regards,

Xia Meng1 Subject: FW: Question Regarding your 2013 P aper in Atmospheric Environment

From: Haidong Kan [ mailto:haidongkan@gmail.com ]

Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 8:55 PM

To: Sacks, Jason < Sacks.Jason@epa.gov >

Cc: '??' < mengxxia@gmail.com >

Subject: RE: Question Regarding your 2013 Paper in Atmospheric Environment



### Dear Jason

Thanks for your interest in our article. The first author of th e article will reply to

your questions soon.

Best,

Haidong Kan

From: Sacks, Jason [ mailto:Sacks.Jason@epa.gov ]

Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 11:11 PM

To: haidongkan@gmail.com

Subject: Question Regarding your 2013 Paper in Atmospheric Environment

Dear Dr. Kan,

My name is Jason Sacks, I’m an epidemiologist at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. I have a question regarding

your 2013 paper in Atmospheric Environment titled: “Short

‐ term effect of ambient air pollution on COPD mortality in

four Chinese cities.” I’ve noticed a discrepancy in the table 2. For eac h of the pollutants it states “single

‐ pollutant model,

Adjusted for SO2, and Adjusted for NO2”, but the pollutant the model is adjusted for should change for SO2 and NO2.

Can you provide me with the correct column headings for the SO2 and NO2 results presented in table 2? Is it corre ct

that the column under SO2 titled “Adjusted for SO2” should instead read “Adjusted for PM10”? While for NO2 the

column titled “Adjusted for NO2” should read “Adjusted for PM10”?

Thanks in advance for your help.

Best regards,

Jason Sacks

Jason D. Sacks, M.P.H.

Senior Epidemiologist

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

National Center for Environmental Assessment

Phone: 919-541-9729

Fax: 919-541-1818
11.1n1tCd ,^tatCs ^Cflatc `

WASHINGTON, DC 20510 

.lanuary 22, 2014 

The Honorable Gina McCarthy 

EPA Administrator 

U.S. Environinental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Adininistrator McCarthy: 

We are writing to share serious concerns regarding the EPA's proposal for the 2014 Renewable 

Volume Obligations (RVOs) under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS.) Congress passed the 

RFS to increase the amount of renewable fuel utilized in our nation's fuel supply. The 

Administration's proposal is a significant step backward — undermining the goal of increasing 

biofuels production as a domestic alternative to foreign oil consumption. Further, the proposed 

waiver places at risk both the environmental benefits from ongoing development of advanced 

biofuels and rural America's economic future. We urge you to modify your proposal. 

The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) provides the EPA with significant authority to adjust to 

shifting conditions over the 15-year life of the policy. In any given year, EPA can adjust the 

advanced biofuel and total biofuel volumes based on anticipated production. While EI'A has 

used the authority to adjust biofuels levels in the past based on anticipated production levels, 

your proposal, for the first time, adjusts the 2014 overall volumes based on criteria not clearly 

identified in the law below anticipated production levels of biofuels and even below previous 

years' RFS levels. 

Further, defining the "blend wall" as blends of E10 and then waiving RFS requirements beyond 

the blend wall creates significant barriers to future biofuels growth. Lack of infrastructure 

remains one of the key hurdles to further deployment of biofuels into the market. Limiting RFS 

to levels that can be met with existing infrastructure eliminates incentives to invest in the 

teclinologies and infrastructure necessary to meet our domestic policy goal of increasing biofuels 

production and use. 

If the rule as proposed were adopted, it will: 

• Replace domestic biofuel production with fossil fuels, contributing to a greater 

dependence on foreign sources of oil and reduce our energy security. 

• Increase unemployment as renewable fuel producers cut back production. 

• Halt investments in cellulosic, biodiesel and other advanced renewable fuels. Rolling 

back the RFS will, potentially strand billions of dollars of private capital; 

• Undermine the deployment of renewable fuels infrastructure throughout the country; 

• 'Threaten the viability of the RFS, thereby solidifying an oil-based transportation sector 

and lowering consumer choice at the pump.
With these concerns in mind, we request that EPA revise the proposed 2014 RVOs in a manner 

that promotes investments in the next generation of biofuels and the infrastructure necessary to 

deploy those fuels into the market. Without a revised proposal, the EPA's rule will bring severe 

economic consequences, and prevent the growth of the renewable fuel sector. 

Thank you in advance for your consideration.

Sincerely, 

^

0 ._^ ^_:., 

^. --^--

-	+	^ 

1	j^	^`l 

1^^^: ^,^OOMNW&
Gl^lA1_,^a_/>^^ 

^ ^ n 

^= ^0.^
#### § 346.8 Release of information under FOIA.

The FDIC will make covered agreements and annual reports available to the public in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552 *et seq.*) and the FDIC's rules regarding Disclosure of Information (12 CFR part 309). A party to a covered agreement may request confidential treatment of proprietary and confidential information in a covered agreement or an annual report under those procedures.
### Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

**Directions for Running the Model for Manufacturers**  EPA has provided the public with the following excel files as documentation of the cost and economic impact analyses. These excel files provide a usable example of the model used by EPA, with all CBI data removed. In order to run the models, users will have to enter relevant data for facilities and firms. Below are a list of directions for using the model. Note, random data and information has been entered for MN1 (the first row of each file) in order to provide an example of how the model works. In order to run the model of the Manufacturers analysis, please refer to the information listed in Table 1 (all of these files must be saved to a singel folder) and follow the directions listed: 1. Download the files listed in the table and save them all in a single folder. 2. Open the files with file types marked as “Supplementary,” “Baseline for Analyses” and “Costsfor Analyses.” Ensure that data is updating correctly between files. a. These files must be open in order to run each set of analysis files. 3. To run Analysis 1, which includes analyses discussed in Chapters 3, 5, 9, and 10 and Appendix N, open all files labeled “Analysis 1” in addition to those files listed in Step 2. 4. To run Analysis 2, which includes analyses discussed in Chapters 7, 8, and 11, open all files labeled “Analysis 2” in addition to those files listed in Step 2. 5. For files that require user input, tabs that require data will be highlighted in blue. Open these tabs and fill in data in the cells that are shaded in blue for at least one facility in order to run the models. a. All cost and financial information should be entered in 2011 dollars. b. The earliest complianceyear users may enter is 2017,to ensure proper running of the model. c. In some cases, comments have been added to tabs in order to clarify what is being asked for.

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3520 ReadMe 1

### Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

**DCN File Nam** **e File Type**  **Requires User Input** 12-3001 MD1_TaxRts.xlsx Supplementary no 12-3002 MD1_Man_Facility_Base_v.3.xlsm Baseline for Analyses yes 12-3003 MD1_Man_CostControl_v.7.xlsxa Costs for Analyses yes 12-3004 MD1_Man_PermitCosts_v.10.xlsx Costs for Analyses no 12-3005 MD1_Man_DT_UnitCosts_v.6.xlsx Costs for Analyses yes 12-3006 MD1_Man_PrivCosts_v.7.xlsma Analysis 1 no 12-3007 MD1_Man_PrivCosts_Gvt.xlsma Analysis 1 no 12-3008 MD1_Man_Facility_RuleImpact_v.5.xlsm Analysis 1 no 12-3009 MD1_Man_Firm_Impact_RFA_v.3.xlsm Analysis 1 no 12-3010 MD1_Man_Parent_Info_Size_v2.xlsx Analysis 1 yes 12-3011 MD1_OtherReg_Impacts_v1.xlsx Analysis 1 yes 12-3012 MD1_Man_SocCosts_v6.xlsxa Analysis 2 no 12-3013 MD1_Man_SocCostCarbon_v.2.xlsx Analysis 2 no 12-3014 MD1_Man_UMRA_v.2xlsxa Analysis 2 no 

### Table 1: List of Manufacturers Analysis Files

a. CCI index has been removed as it is based on proprietary data.



### EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3520 ReadMe 2
# C_2011336EN.01001901.xml

| 17.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/19

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 28 June 2011

in Case E-18/10

EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway

(Non-compliance with a judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations — Article 33 SCA — Measures necessary to comply with a judgment of the Court)

2011/C 336/13

In Case E-18/10, EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway — APPLICATION for a declaration that, by failing to take the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of the EFTA Court in Case E-2/07 — EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 33 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Thorgeir Örlygsson and Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 28 June 2011, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | declares that, by failing to take the measures necessary to comply with the judgment in Case E-2/07 — EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 33 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declares that, by failing to take the measures necessary to comply with the judgment in Case E-2/07 — EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 33 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice;

| 2. | orders the Kingdom of Norway to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Kingdom of Norway to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,William E. Franklin, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A(Amendment No. 1) of Copart, Inc.; and

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 
|   | Date:  December 29, 2009                      |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                               |
|   | /s/  William E. Franklin                           |
|   | William  E. Franklin                               |
|   | Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EPOLIN,
INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED AUGUST 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-END>                    AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                          1,192,995
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   415,736
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     463,007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,094,491
<PP&E>                          1,122,281
<DEPRECIATION>                  662,204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,796,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           203,563
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        2,229,658
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,796,051
<SALES>                         1,154,597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,154,597
<CGS>                           374,933
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   374,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                331,444
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 478,840
<INCOME-TAX>                    194,207
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             284,633
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    284,633
<EPS-BASIC>                   .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .02




</TABLE>
#### § 308.541 Judicial review.

Section 3805 of title 31, United States Code, authorizes judicial review by an appropriate United States District Court of a final decision of the Board imposing penalties or assessments under this subpart and specifies the procedures for such review.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3045 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3045

 To amend section 105 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 
1974 to permanently extend the public service cap exemption for certain 
     grantees under the community development block grant program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2003

Mr. Dreier (for himself and Ms. Waters) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 105 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 
1974 to permanently extend the public service cap exemption for certain 
     grantees under the community development block grant program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Services Flexibility Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. PUBLIC SERVICES CAP EXEMPTION.

    Section 105(a)(8) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 
1974 (42 U.S.C. 5305(a)(8)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``each of fiscal years 1993 through 2003'' 
        and inserting ``any fiscal year''; and
            (2) by striking ``each'' before ``such fiscal year''.
                                 <all>
```
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Return to Election Negotiations

# 									Return to Election Negotiations							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

April 28, 2021

The United States notes President Farmaajo’s April 28 commitment to return to the September 17 election agreement and resume talks immediately with Federal Member State leaders. We call on the President and Parliament to act swiftly to annul the April 12 mandate extension bill.

We commend Prime Minister Roble and the Federal Member State leaders for rejecting a mandate extension. We urge Somalia’s national and Federal Member State leaders to meet immediately to finalize a consensus-based electoral model and hold parliamentary and presidential elections as soon as possible on the basis of the September 17 agreement. All leaders must set aside their political aspirations and differences for the good of the Somali people and negotiate in good faith without preconditions and with a willingness to compromise.

We also call on Somalia’s security forces and all armed groups to stand down and allow political dialogue to resume in an atmosphere free from violence and intimidation. Continuing conflict will only serve to worsen conditions for the people of Somalia.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborElectionsOffice of the SpokespersonSomalia

Back to Top
Exhibit 4.1


SPECIMEN COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE- FRONT

                Not Valid Unless Countersigned By Transfer Agent

              Incorporated Under The Laws Of The State Of Delaware

                          Consolidated Pictures Corp.
Number  (     )                                                  Shares (      )

              Authorized Stock 50,000,000 Shares $.0001 par value
                   See Reverse for certain Definitions. CUSIP

 This Certifies that _________ is the Registered holder of ___________ shares of
                          Consolidated Pictures Corp.

Transferable only on the books of the corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.

In Witness Whereof, the said corporation has caused this certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and its corporate seal to be hereunto
affixed.

Dated:

______________________                              ____________________________
Secretary                        Corporate Seal                        President

Transfer Agent and registrar:                       Countersigned and registered
Atlas Stock Transfer Corporation
5899 South State Street                             By _________________________
Salt Lake City, Utah 84107                                Authorized Signature

<PAGE>

SPECIMEN STOCK CERTIFICATE-REVERSE

The Following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM - as tenants in common         UNIF GIFT MIN ACT-------Custodian--------
TEN ENT- as tenants by the entireties                   (Cust)           (Minor)
JT TEN - as joint tenants with                under Uniforms Gifts to Minors Act
right of survivorship and not as                ___________________________
tenants in common                                        (State)


Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.

For Value Received, ______________ hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto_________________ (Please insert social security or other identifying
number) assignee _____________________________________________________________
(Please print or typewrite name and address, including zip code, of assignee)

Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint _____________ Attorney to transfer the said
stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises.

Dated ___________________         Signature _________________________________

Notice: The signature in this assignment must correspond with the name written
upon the face of the certificate, in every particular, without alteration or
enlargement, or any change whatever.

Signature Guaranteed By:

(Please have signature guaranteed by a National Bank through its officer or by a
member firm of a major stock exchange.)
# C_2021141EN.01001001.xml

| 22.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/10

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2021/C 141/10)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 18 December 2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 85979 |
| Decision No | 168/20/COL |
| EFTA State | Iceland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Harpa tónlistar- og ráðstefnuhús ohf. |
| Legal basis | As for the State, the State budget act for 2020 and budget bill for 2021. As for the City of Reykjavík, the revised city budget and approved budget for 2021. |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Compensation for damage suffered as a direct consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the response measures adopted by the Icelandic Government as a result thereof. |
| Form of aid | Grant |
| Budget | ISK 400 million |
| Intensity | 85,8 % (estimated) |
| Economic sectors | L68 – Real estate activities;
  R93 – Sports activities and amusement and recreation activities;
  N82.3 – Organisation of conventions and trade shows |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs |
| Arnarhvoli |
| 101 Reykjavík |
| The City of Reykjavík |
| Ráðhúsið, Tjarnargötu 11 |
| 101 Reykjavík |
| ICELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

18 December 2020

Case No

85979

Decision No

168/20/COL

EFTA State

Iceland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Harpa tónlistar- og ráðstefnuhús ohf.

Legal basis

As for the State, the State budget act for 2020 and budget bill for 2021. As for the City of Reykjavík, the revised city budget and approved budget for 2021.

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Compensation for damage suffered as a direct consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the response measures adopted by the Icelandic Government as a result thereof.

Form of aid

Grant

Budget

ISK 400 million

Intensity

85,8 % (estimated)

Economic sectors

L68 – Real estate activities;

R93 – Sports activities and amusement and recreation activities;

N82.3 – Organisation of conventions and trade shows

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs

Arnarhvoli

101 Reykjavík

The City of Reykjavík

Ráðhúsið, Tjarnargötu 11

101 Reykjavík

ICELAND

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---