alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1
 
 Year Ended December 31,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Fixed Charges:Interest expense on
indebtedness
(including
amortization of debt
expense and discount)
    
    $
    29,492
    
    
    $
    17,849
    
    
    $
    22,868
    
    
    $
    23,723
    
    
    $
    23,746Interest expense on
portion of rent
expense
representative
of interest
    
    
    19,899
    
    
    
    14,614
    
    
    
    9,089
    
    
    
    7,604
    
    
    
    7,206Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    49,391
    
    
    $
    32,463
    
    
    $
    31,957
    
    
    $
    31,327
    
    
    $
    30,952Earnings (Loss):Net loss before
provision for income
taxes and cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
    
    $
    (251,173
    )
    
    $
    (239,439
    )
    
    $
    (242,898
    )
    
    $
    (185,324
    )
    
    $
    (219,716
    )Fixed Charges per above
    
    
    49,391
    
    
    
    32,463
    
    
    
    31,957
    
    
    
    31,327
    
    
    
    30,952Total Earnings (Loss)
    
    $
    (201,782
    )
    
    $
    (206,976
    )
    
    $
    (210,941
    )
    
    $
    (153,997
    )
    
    $
    (188,764
    )Ratio of Earnings to
Fixed Charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Coverage deficiency(1)(2)(3)
    
    $
    (251,173
    )
    
    $
    (239,439
    )
    
    $
    (242,898
    )
    
    $
    (185,324
    )
    
    $
    (219,716
    )
 
 (1)
    
    The Companys Coverage deficiency for 2006 includes charges for lease termination and
restructuring of $29,510 partially offset by a gain on the sale of an equity investment of
$14,759.(2)
    
    The Companys Coverage deficiency for 2004 includes net charges of $12,975, relating to a
$15,408 charge for restructuring partially offset by a gain recognized on the extinguishment
of debt of $2,433.(3)
    
    The Companys Coverage deficiency for 2002 includes charges aggregating $46,396 arising from
the Companys impairment charge relating to its investment in CAT and a charge for
construction design changes of $32,158 and $14,238, respectively.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         832,184
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,798,597
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,630,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          696,660
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,934,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,630,781
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,391,026
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,026,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,364,936
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,364,936
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2011182EN.01001001.xml

| 23.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/10

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61 of the EEA Agreement

2011/C 182/07

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 16 March 2011 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case number | : | 68330 |
| Decision number | : | 68/11/2011 |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Name of the beneficiary | : | Troms Kraft Produksjon AS |
| Type of measure | : | Individual aid under the Energy Fund Scheme, subject to a detailed assessment under the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection |
| Scheme | : | The Energy Fund scheme approved by the EFTA Surveillance Authority with Decision No 125/06/COL on 3 May 2006, prolonged with Decision No 486/10/COL of 15 December 2010 |
| Objective | : | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | : | Grant |
| Aid amount | : | NOK 346,4 million |
| Economic sectors | : | Electricity production |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : | Enova SF |
| Professor Borchsgt. 2 |
| 7030 Trondheim |
| NORWAY |

Date of adoption of the decision

:

16 March 2011

Case number

:

68330

Decision number

:

68/11/2011

EFTA State

:

Norway

Name of the beneficiary

:

Troms Kraft Produksjon AS

Type of measure

:

Individual aid under the Energy Fund Scheme, subject to a detailed assessment under the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection

Scheme

:

The Energy Fund scheme approved by the EFTA Surveillance Authority with Decision No 125/06/COL on 3 May 2006, prolonged with Decision No 486/10/COL of 15 December 2010

Objective

:

Environmental protection

Form of aid

:

Grant

Aid amount

:

NOK 346,4 million

Economic sectors

:

Electricity production

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Enova SF

Professor Borchsgt. 2

7030 Trondheim

NORWAY

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
### NUMBER 13

- 13

- 00 425

- CR


## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

JOASH SOLIS , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

.

On appeal from the 329 th District Court of Wharton County, Texas

.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Joash Solis , attempts to appeal his conviction for assault. The trial

court has certified that this “ is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of
appeal. ” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2).2 On August 13, 2013 , we ordered appellant's counsel to, within thirty days, review
the record and advise this Court as to whether appellant has a right to appeal. See T EX

.
R. A PP

. P . 44.3, 44.4. Counsel did not respond and the case was abated and remanded
to the trial court on August 30, 2013. On September 24, 2013
, the trial court issued
findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellant has waived his right to appeal. This
appeal is hereby REINSTATED.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be

dismissed if the trial court ’ s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of
appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 3 7.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this
appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are d ismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the 7th day of November , 2013

.
§ 238.77 Waiver of prior notice requirement. ( a ) *Waiver request.* An individual may serve as a director or senior executive officer before filing a notice under this subpart if the Board or Reserve Bank finds that: ( 1 ) Delay would threaten the safety or soundness of the savings and loan holding company;
( 2 ) Delay would not be in the public interest; or
( 3 ) Other extraordinary circumstances exist that justify waiver of prior notice.
( b ) *Automatic waiver.* An individual may serve as a director upon election to the board of directors before filing a notice under this subpart, if the individual: ( 1 ) Is not proposed by the management of the savings and loan holding company;
( 2 ) Is elected as a new member of the board of directors at a meeting of the savings and loan holding company; and
( 3 ) Provides to the appropriate Reserve Bank all the information required in § 238.74 within two (2) business days after the individual's election.
( c ) *Subsequent Board or Reserve Bank action.* The Board or Reserve Bank may disapprove a notice within 30 days after the Board or Reserve Bank issues a waiver under paragraph (a) of this section or within 30 days after the election of an individual who has filed a notice and is serving pursuant to an automatic waiver under paragraph (b) of this section.
#### The Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association, Appellant, *v.*Porfirio Cordero, Impleaded, Etc., Respondent.

(City Court of New York, General Term,

December, 1900.)

Action for rent — Dispossession order an estoppel as to tenancy and occupation.

In an action to recover rent, proof of an order dispossessing the defendant for non-payment of rent, concludes him as to tenancy and occupation, even though the order was taken by default and upon substituted service. The only question open is the amount of rent due.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of the defendant, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

George Burnham, Jr. (Sewell T. Tvng, of counsel), for appellant.

William Sulzer, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The record in the dispossession proceedings was conclusive against the defendant Cordero as regards his tenancy and occupancy of the premises, and the court erred in admitting testimony tending to prove nonoccupancy. In an action to recover rent, proof of the summary proceedings dispossessing the defendant from the premises in question for nonpayment of the rent sued for is conclusive against the defendant as to his tenancy and occupation of such premises. Grafton v. Brigham, 70 Hun, 131; McCotter v. Flinn, 30 Misc. Rep. 119; Reich v. Cochran, 151 N. Y. 122. This is so even though the order in the summary proceedings is by default (Brown v. Mayor, 66 N. Y. 385); and it is immaterial whether the order by default is rendered upon, personal or substituted service of the precept. McCotter v. Flinn, 30 Misc. Rep. 119. The only question open is as to the amount of rent due. Jarvis v. Driggs, 69 N. Y. 147.

Judgment and order appealed from reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event.

Present: McCarthy, O’Dwyer and Scotchman, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

# SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Theragenics Corporation®, (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, M. Christine Jacobs, President and Chief
Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

By:/s/ M. Christine
Jacobs

M.
Christine Jacobs     Chief Executive Officer     September
14, 2003
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David Lieberman, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of DATASCENSION INC.





2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Dated: June 2, 2010/s/ David P. Lieberman_______________________

David Lieberman

Principal Accounting Officer
# C_2017198EN.01000501.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/5

---

No State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement

(2017/C 198/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:

| Date of adoption of the decision | : | 29 March 2017 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Case No | : | 79248 |
| Decision No | : | 064/17/COL |
| EFTA State | : | Norway |
| Region | : |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | : |
| Legal basis | : | Decision of the Norwegian Parliament of 14 December 2015 and Section 3-22 of Regulation No 1451 from 11 December 2001 on excise duties |
| Type of measure | : |
| Objective | : |
| Form of aid | : | No aid |
| Budget | : |
| Intensity | : |
| Duration | : |
| Economic sectors | : |
| Name and address of the granting authority | : |
| Other information | : |

Date of adoption of the decision

Date of adoption of the decision

:

29 March 2017

Case No

Case No

:

79248

Decision No

Decision No

:

064/17/COL

EFTA State

EFTA State

:

Norway

Region

Region

:

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

:

Legal basis

Legal basis

:

Decision of the Norwegian Parliament of 14 December 2015 and Section 3-22 of Regulation No 1451 from 11 December 2001 on excise duties

Type of measure

Type of measure

:

Objective

Objective

:

Form of aid

Form of aid

:

No aid

Budget

Budget

:

Intensity

Intensity

:

Duration

Duration

:

Economic sectors

Economic sectors

:

Name and address of the granting authority

Name and address of the granting authority

:

Other information

Other information

:

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/

---
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Access to EducationCompliance (Legal)DisabilitiesDisadvantaged YouthEducational ImprovementEducational PolicyExceptional PersonsFederal State RelationshipJob TrainingPolicy FormationPostsecondary EducationProgram EffectivenessProgram ImplementationProgram ImprovementResource AllocationSchool DistrictsSecondary Education

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
# Child Health Day, 2009

Our Nation has an obligation to provide access to affordable, high-quality health care for all our children. No child should be forced to go without medical attention because the cost of a doctor visit is too high. Healthy children are better equipped to combat illness and to perform well in school, impacting their development well into adulthood. On Child Health Day, we recognize the fundamental importance of health care for our Nation's children, and dedicate our collective energies to support their needs and those of their families.

The responsibility for our children's health rests with every American. Parents and guardians should lead by example. We must teach our children the importance of healthy eating and a physically active lifestyle. We can support community programs across America that provide our young people with healthy choices, and ensure that families have the resources necessary to champion the health of their children. From outdoor activities to community athletic teams, we can seize opportunities to increase physical activity in the lives of our children, and promote healthy habits at an early age.

When our children make smart, healthy decisions, they are set on the path towards success. A balanced diet, coupled with proper exercise, has proven effective in combating childhood obesity and other chronic illnesses among our Nation's young people. More recently, the lure of indoor distractions has drawn our children away from the athletic fields and outdoor activities that can be part of a healthy lifestyle. We must engage our Nation's children in behaviors that support their physical fitness, ensure they have access to healthy, affordable food, and empower their families with the information essential for healthy living.

As a Nation, we cannot allow our children to fail in reaching their full potential because we fail to meet their basic needs. My Administration has made children's health a priority, and I was proud to sign the reauthorization of the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), extending health care to millions of young Americans who were previously uninsured. Today, we celebrate the health of our children and rededicate ourselves to providing a bright, healthy future for our Nation's youth.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Monday, October 5, 2009, as Child Health Day.

I call upon families, child health professionals, faith-based and community organizations, and governments to help ensure that America's children stay safe and healthy.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this second day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth.

[FR Doc. E9-24446

Billing code 3195-W9-P
#### § 390.291 Director.

The term *director* means any director, trustee, or other person performing similar functions with respect to any organization whether incorporated or unincorporated. Such term does not include an advisory director, honorary director, director emeritus, or similar person, unless the person is otherwise performing functions similar to those of a director.
#### ROSE TANZMAN, PETITIONER-DEFENDANT, v. SHELTON DRESS SHOP, INC., RESPONDENT-PROSECUTOR.

Submitted January 16, 1940

Decided February 23, 1940.

Before Justices Bodine and Perskie.

For the prosecutor, *Jacob Ratner*and *Julius Kass.*

For the defendant, *Henry M. Grosman*and *Isidor Kalisch.*

Bodine, J.

The writ brings up for review an award of compensation affirmed in the Middlesex County Court of Common Pleas. The employe admittedly suffered a fifty per cent, injury by reason of a cerebral hemorrhage on the evening of December 10th, 1938. The accident occurred while she was working in the defendant’s shop lifting a box of merchandise from the floor for the purpose of unpacking it.

The prosecutor of this writ predicates its argument for reversal on the theory that the cerebral hemorrhage was not caused by an accident but by disease. This question has been presented to us in many forms and in many phases for a number of years. We can see no difference between an accidental strain of the blood vessels in the brain resulting in leakage and an accidental strain of the blood vessels leading to and from the heart. *Hentz*v. *Janssen Dairy Co.,*122 *N. J. L.*494. The employe is entitled to compensation for an accident arising out of and in the course of the employment.

A strain in the work, however slight, which causes an injury to the employe may be due to accident, and so the proofs here show.

The writ will be dismissed, with costs.