alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 199 (Friday, October 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-24820]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Lost River Subwatershed of the Potomac River Watershed, Hardy 
County, WV

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of availability of a record of decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Louis Aspey, responsible Federal official for projects 
administered under the provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1944, 
Public Law 78-534, in the State of West Virginia, is hereby providing 
notification that a Record of Decision to proceed with the installation 
of the Lost River Site 16 project on Lower Cove Run is available. 
Single copies of this Record of Decision may be obtained from Louis 
Aspey at the address shown below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louis Aspey, Acting State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1550 Earl Core 
Road, Suite 200, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, telephone (304) 284-
7540.

    Dated: October 7, 2009.
Louis E. Aspey II,
Acting State Conservationist.

``(This activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance under No. 10-904--Watershed Protection and Flood 
Prevention--and is subject to the provisions of Executive Order 
12372 which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and 
local officials.)''

[FR Doc. E9-24820 Filed 10-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.16

                      CANADIAN RAINFOREST RESTAURANTS, INC.

                   Abstract of Canadian Niagara Sub-Franchise


PARTIES TO AGREEMENT Canadian Rainforest Restaurants, Inc. ("CRRI")
                     Rainforest Cafe, Inc.("RCI") Jungle Restaurants Niagara
                     ("JRN")

GRANT OF FRANCHISE   RCI and CRRI grant a franchise for the development of one
                     Rainforest Cafe in Niagara Falls, Ontario

INITIAL TERM         Ten years

RENEWALS             Three terms of 5 years each

LICENCE FEE          CDN $900,000 payable on execution

OPENING FEE          CDN $100,000 payable on opening of restaurant

ROYALTIES            Seven % of Gross Sales

ADVERTISING          Three % of Gross Sales


ELEPHANT & CASTLE INTERNATIONAL, INC.                    5 GTM/LEH/JAW 042199
ALAMO GRILL  FRANCHISE AGREEMENT                                     475250.5
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 183 (Monday, September 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 56616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22490]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8873]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Wartime Artifacts From the State Museum of 
Auschwitz (Poland)'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Wartime Artifacts from the State 
Museum of Auschwitz (Poland),'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign 
owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of 
the exhibit objects at the Los Angeles Museum of the Holocaust, Los 
Angeles, CA, from on or about October 1, 2014, until on or about 
September 30, 2018, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including 
lists of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 16, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-22490 Filed 9-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 45
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 45 appear at 80 FR 74898, 74910, Nov. 30, 2015.

§ 45.10 Documentation of margin matters. A covered swap entity shall execute trading documentation with each counterparty that is either a swap entity or financial end user regarding credit support arrangements that: ( a ) Provides the covered swap entity and its counterparty with the contractual right to collect and post initial margin and variation margin in such amounts, in such form, and under such circumstances as are required by this subpart, and at such time as initial margin or variation margin is required to be collected or posted under § 45.3 or § 45.4, as applicable; and
( b ) Specifies: ( 1 ) The methods, procedures, rules, and inputs for determining the value of each non-cleared swap or non-cleared security-based swap for purposes of calculating variation margin requirements; and
( 2 ) The procedures by which any disputes concerning the valuation of non-cleared swaps or non-cleared security-based swaps, or the valuation of assets collected or posted as initial margin or variation margin, may be resolved; and
( c ) Describes the methods, procedures, rules, and inputs used to calculate initial margin for non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security based swaps entered into between the covered swap entity and the counterparty.
[80 FR 74898, Nov. 30, 2015, as amended at 85 FR 39772, July 1, 2020]
#### § 308.114 Burden of proof.

The ultimate burden of proof shall be upon the person proposing to acquire a depository institution. The burden of going forward with a *prima facie* case shall be upon the FDIC.
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 21

- 60169

Mansfield Industrial, Incorporated,

Petitioner

,

versus

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission;

Martin Walsh, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor

,

Respondents

.

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

OSHRC No. 17

- 1214

Before Jo lly , Willett, and Engelhardt

, Circuit Judges

.

Per Curiam : *

The petition for review is DENIED

.

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED

November 16, 2021

Lyle W . Cayce

Clerk Case: 21-60169 Document: 00516095045 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/16/2021
#### TOWN OF EUTAW V. MORGAN.

(Decided June 16, 1913.)

Appeal from Greene Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Bernard Harwood.

McKinley, McQueen, Hawkins & S-now, for appellant. Evins & Jack, for appellee.

Per curiam.

Appeal dismissed.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3151

To amend part B of title III of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to 

expand the eligibility requirement to include Predominantly Black Institutions of higher education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2003

Mr. OWENS (for himself, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. RUSH, Mr. 

FATTAH, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. NORTON, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mrs. 

JONES of Ohio, Mr. WYNN, Mr. PAYNE, and Mr. MEEKS of New York) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend part B of title III of the Higher Education Act 

of 1965 to expand the eligibility requirement to include 

Predominantly Black Institutions of higher education.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘HBCU Expansion Act 

5 of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds the following: 
2

•HR 3151 IH 

1 (1) Over the last several years post-secondary 

2 institutions have faced a dramatic increase in the 

3 number of non-traditional students. Predominantly 

4 Black Institutions, following the pattern of histori5 cally Black colleges and universities (referred to as 

6 ‘‘HBCU’s’’), have helped ease the influx by offering 

7 an affordable quality education. 

8 (2) Currently, more than 100,000 students at9 tend Predominantly Black Institutions. Similar to 

10 HBCU’s the majority of these students depend heav11 ily on Federal financial aid to graduate from college. 

12 (3) Predominantly Black Institutions, like 

13 HBCU’s, provide opportunities for minority students 

14 to pursue post-secondary degrees. 

15 (4) Predominantly Black Institutions, like 

16 HBCU’s, have produced a cadre of leaders who 

17 make up a significant number of the Nation’s minor18 ity doctors, lawyers and other professionals. 

19 (5) Predominantly Black Institutions, like 

20 HBCU’s, provide students from under-served com21 munities with academic and emotional support which 

22 translates to high retention and graduation rates. 
3

•HR 3151 IH 

1 SEC. 3. QUALIFYING PREDOMINANTLY BLACK INSTITU2 TIONS. 

3 Section 322 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

4 U.S.C. 1061) is amended—

5 (1) in paragraph (2)—

6 (A) by striking ‘‘means any’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘means (A) any’’; and 

8 (B) by inserting before the period at the 

9 end the following: ‘‘or (B) any Predominantly 

10 Black Institution’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(6) The term ‘Predominantly Black Institu14 tion’ means any institution of higher education 

15 that—

16 ‘‘(A) is an eligible institution under section 

17 312(b) that complies with paragraph (1)(C)(i) 

18 of such section; and 

19 ‘‘(B) at the time of application, has a stu20 dent enrollment of at least 500 full-time stu21 dents, at least 51 percent of whom are African 

22 Americans.’’.

Æ
Water Quality Standards Regulatory Revisions Rulemaking

MEMORANDUM TO RECORD SUBJECT: Meeting with State-EPA Roundtable DATE: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 TIME: Noon – 1:30 PM
Participants: EPA – Grace Robiou, Manjali Vlcan, Janita Aguirre, Heather Goss, Gary Russo, Ruth Chemerys, Peter Ford, James Curtin, Glynis Hill, Ellen Weitzler, Wayne Jackson, Cheryl Atkinson, Lauren Petter, David Pfeifer, Russell Nelson, Ann Lavaty, George Parrish, Terrence Fleming, Phillip Woods, William Beckwith ACWA/States –Gerry Szal (Massachusetts), Scott Stoner (New York), Alex Barron (Virginia) Connie Brower (North Carolina), Tom Stiles (Kansas), Sarah Johnson (Colorado), Lindsay Patterson (Wyoming), Nancy Sonafrank (Alaska), Susan Braley (Washington) Summary of Meeting: Participants discussed options derived from public comments received for Compliance Schedule Authorizing Provision, Administrator’s Determination, and Triennial Review. Agenda TOPIC TIME LEAD__________ 1. Roll Call 10 min Aguirre 2. Compliance Schedule Authorizing Provision 20 min Goss 3. Administrator’s Determination 20 min Aguirre 4. Triennial Review 20 min Aguirre 5. Questions & Answers 15 min Roundtable 6. Reminders for next Roundtable meeting 5 min Aguirre
Case:17-03283-LTS Doc#:19975-1 

Env
§ 308.525 Form, filing, and service of papers. ( a ) *Form.* ( 1 ) Documents filed with the ALJ must include an original and two copies.
( 2 ) Every pleading and paper filed in the proceeding must contain a caption setting forth the title of the action, the case number assigned by the ALJ, and a designation of the paper (e.g., motion to quash subpoena).
( 3 ) Every pleading and paper must be signed by, and must contain the address and telephone number of the party or the person on whose behalf the paper was filed, or his or her representative.
( 4 ) Papers are considered filed when they are mailed by certified or registered mail. Date of mailing may be established by a certificate from the party or its representative or by proof that the document was sent by certified or registered mail.
( b ) *Service.* A party filing a document with the ALJ must, at the time of filing, serve a copy of such document on every other party. Service upon any party of any document other than those required to be served as prescribed in § 308.507 of this subpart must be made by delivering a copy or by placing a copy of the document in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to the party's last known address. When a party is represented by a representative, service must be made upon such representative in lieu of the actual party. The ALJ may authorize facsimile transmission as an acceptable form of service.
( c ) *Proof of service.* A certificate by the individual serving the document by personal delivery or by mail, setting forth the manner of service, will be proof of service.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Transnational Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jonathan A. Shaw, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Jonathan A. Shaw
--------------------
Jonathan A. Shaw
President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: June 14, 2003

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
§ 252.1 Authority and purpose. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Board) under sections 162, 165, 167, and 168 of Title I of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) (Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376, 1423-1432, 12 U.S.C. 5362, 5365, 5367, and 5368); section 9 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 321-338a); section 5(b) of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1844(b)); sections 8 and 39 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1818(b) and 1831p-1); the International Banking Act (12 U.S.C. 3101 *et seq.*); the Foreign Bank Supervision Enhancement Act (12 U.S.C. 3101 note); and 12 U.S.C. 3904, 3906-3909, and 4808.
( b ) *Purpose.* This part implements certain provisions of section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Act (12 U.S.C. 5365), which require the Board to establish enhanced prudential standards for certain bank holding companies, foreign banking organizations, nonbank financial companies supervised by the Board, and certain other companies.
[84 FR 59096, Nov. 1, 2019]
```

[110th Congress Public Law 40]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ040.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 232]]

Public Law 110-40
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 1936, pertaining to the 
          Virgin Islands. <<NOTE: June 29, 2007 -  [H.R. 57]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN LAWS PERTAINING TO THE VIRGIN 
                              ISLANDS.

    (a) Repeal.--Sections 1 through 6 of the Act of May 26, 1936 
(Chapter 450; 49 Stat. 1372-1373; 48 U.S.C. 1401-1401e) are repealed.
    (b) Effective <<NOTE: 48 USC 1401 note.>> Date.--This section shall 
be deemed to have taken effect on July 22, 1954.

    Approved June 29, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 57:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 110-19 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Jan. 17, considered and passed House.
            June 12, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1410

MICHAEL ANTONIO GOMEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: November 30, 2011 Decided: December 21, 2011

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William J. Kovatch, Jr., Alexandria, Virginia, for Petitioner. 

Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, William C. Peachey, 

Assistant Director, Eric W. Marsteller, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF JUSTICE, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., 

for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Antonio Gomez, a native and citizen of 

Nicaragua, has petitioned for review of an order of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals dismissing Gomez’s appeal of the Immigration 

Judge’s order declining to continue his case and ordering him 

removed from the United States. The Attorney General has moved 

to dismiss the petition for review because Gomez has been 

convicted of a larceny offense that qualifies as an aggravated 

felony and two controlled substance offenses, which subject his 

appeal to the jurisdictional bar set forth in 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(a)(2)(C) (2006). We retain jurisdiction, however, to 

address any constitutional claims or questions of law. See 8 

U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D) (2006).

We have considered Gomez’s claims, including his 

contention that he should have been permitted to collaterally 

attack his convictions under Padilla v. Kentucky, __ U.S. __, 

130 S. Ct. 1473 (2010), in immigration court, and find them to 

be without merit. See Waugh v. Holder, 642 F.3d 1279, 1283-84 

(10th Cir. 2011); In re Madrigal, 21 I. & N. Dec. 323, 327 (BIA 

1996).

Accordingly, we grant the Attorney General’s motion to 

dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Gomez’s motion to 

expedite as moot and dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4-7

                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF
                          ENERGY EAST CAPITAL TRUST I

                  THIS Certificate of Trust of Energy East Capital Trust I (the
"Trust") is being duly executed and filed on behalf of the Trust by the
undersigned, as trustee, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business
Trust Act (12 DEL. C.ss.3801 ET SEQ.) (the "Act").

                  1. NAME. The name of the business trust formed by this
Certificate of Trust is Energy East Capital Trust I.

                  2. DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the
trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware are Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, 1201 Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attn:
Institutional Trust Services.

                  3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust shall be
effective upon filing.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.

                                      CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                                      NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, not in its
                                      individual capacity but solely as
                                      trustee of the Trust


                                      By: /s/ DENIS KELLY
                                          ----------------------------------
                                      Name: Denis Kelly
                                      Title: Assistant Vice President
#### Morris JUSTICE *v.*Lloyd RINGGOLD, Administrator

5-6078

491 S.W. 2d 382

Opinion delivered March 12, 1973

*Williamson ir Mattingly,*for appellant.

*Haley, Young, Bogará & Gitchell,*P. A. and *Thomas Glaze,*for appellee.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The appellee is the estate of Julian Justice, who died on August 29, 1969. The appellant, Morris Justice, is the decedent’s son. The elder Justice, using his own money, opened a checking account in the First Jacksonville Bank, the account being entitled “Julian Justice or Morris Justice.” At Julian’s death there was $1,373.84 in the account. Julian also purchased from the bank a $6,-300 certificate of deposit, payable to Julian Justice or Morris Justice. Julian did not in either instance sign a card or other document referring to survivorship or otherwise clarifying the ownership of the checking account or of the certificate of deposit.

After Julian’s death the bank paid the amount of the checking account and the amount of the certificate to Morris Justice. Ringgold, as administrator, brought this action to recover both amounts for the estate. Morris Justice appeals from a judgment sustaining the administrator’s claim to both sums.

The judgment is correct. In *Cook*v. *Bevill,*246 Ark. 805, 440 S.W. 2d 570 (1969), upon facts that cannot be distinguished from those in the case at bar, we dis*11cussed the controlling statutes at length and concluded that no survivorship interest was created where the decedent did not affix his signature to any instrument complying with the statutory requirement that the survivorship interest be designated in writing. That case governs this one.

Affirmed.